The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-64.-5-12MINOE SUBDIVISIOi'q HAP OF PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR. ,~,LiDi~EL,,,./ R k'2UPSf41 SOUT NOLD 'row~ o~.so_u2k~oL D, 'TQWH NARBOf?. LANE SOUTHO L P.,_M. ,_Y_! tlg?l ISCALE' 100'= I~ SEE PETAIL IqOT ES: ~ LOT N05.~HO%k/N T~U$ ~ [A__~U~ TO HAP S~FR ~, CLERff~ OFFICE ~ HAP ~. t055, FACILITIE~ FO~ ALL [-OT~ O~ THI~ ~A¢ ~O~PLY ~IT~ THE STAfqOA~D~_.j~.~ ~EQ ~ E_~T5 OF MEW ~M ~Aq'E LICENSE M~RS626 5UFFOL~ CO, DSPARTH~NT OF HEALTH F' AP.P?R.~£1)~ ~ .~- ~.T.. .... .~....8.. / ~ ....... '~ .... _.___ ~" ' DI~ISt0}I Of ErlVIRONME?,~TAL Ii.L/. _ · ~. ~'T.'OF HEALTH SERVICES, SUFI:OL~ ~OUItT.¥ SOU'fHOLD TOWN P?,A.~_H~!iJ6 ¢OAi?.D APPROVED BY PLANNff~G BOARD TOWN OF 5OUTIIOL~ ........................... ~'T AT P0~TD SHOWN AREA,30,7995Q.FT. OBI 9m5 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 7,1995 Richard Lark, Esq. P.O. Box 975 Cutchogue, NY 11955 Re: Proposed minorsubdivislon for Andrew KrupsB SCTM# 1000-64-5-12 & 15. Dear Mr. Lark: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, February 6, 1995: The final public hearing, which was held at 7::55 p.m., was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Andrew P. Krupski is the owner of the property Imown and designated as SCTM# 1000-64-5-12 & 13, located on the west: side of Town Harbor Lane in Southold; and WHEREAS, this proposed minor subdivision, Lo be known as minor subdivision for Andrew Krupsld, Is for 2 lots on 30,799 square feeL; and WHEREAS, a variance to the Zoning Ordinance was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on, Apdl 27, 1983 subject to two conditions; and WHEREAS, the SouLhold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on October 3. 1994; and Page 2 Minor subdivision for Andrew Krupski February 7, 1995 WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on February 6, 1995; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning I~!oard approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surve~/s dated November 15, 1994. Enclosed please find a copy of the survey which was endorsed by the Chairman. The mylar maps which were also endorsed by the Chairman, must be picked up at this office and filed in the office of the County Clerk. Any plat not so filed or recorded within sixty (60) days of the date of final approval, shall become null and void. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard O. Ward Chairman enc. cc: Zoning Board of Appeals Building Dept. Tax Assessors THI5 MINOR SUBDIVISION 15 FOR ,., ~ LOTS ON ~ :Z~ ~..a~a~,L~ ~7;~-~ ;4-or~),r ~-,~..- IN SCTM# 1000- g'~ - 5- ~2~ L3- ACR%2 LOCATED ON MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) Complete application receiv,¢ V' ,~...a" ' . /.~. / ~o~ ~.. ,~ ~ ,K,~,.,,-,,.~ ' Application reviewed at work session Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised submission received Sketch plan approval -with conditions Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewe'll location Notification to applicant to include on final map Sent to County Planning Commission Receii~t of County Report Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval . Final Public Hearing Approval'of subdivision APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the To~vn of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for ~ltlK('J~l~ (final) app[oval of a subdivision plat in accordance xvlth Article 16 of the Town Laxv and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Toxvn Planning Board, and represents and states as folloxvs: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the o~vner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . ..M.~.rI9.r.. ~.l,l[o.d.:j..v.$~.J~p.I)..f.Q~ .~r~.~,w..~.~.. " Krup. ski 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy o[ deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as folloxvs: Liber .... ~.2..5.2. .............. Page ....... 5..5.5. ........... On . .J..u.n..e...1.5.:..1..9.7..7...; ~x~t~fq~l~ .................... , .................................................... 5. Tbe area of the land is .~.Q,.7.9..9...s.q:..f.t.x~,..~ 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid Kgrcl$11~ ............ Dot 7. The land is/%ncumbered by ally .......................................................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land ~.xoe~: ........................ I0. No part of the land lles uuder water whether tide water, stream, pond xvater or otherwise,:Xo'~ 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) (lt~:~;t lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is ... .V.i.1.].0..cJ~.. 0.f....G. 17.o.~.np. 9.r.t. ..................... No 13./SVater mains will be laid by . .a.P.D.i.J-..c~'3..~gj...e~..' .8.L.5:n.g..V..J:.i..1.ac~.e..o..f..G..r.o...e.~...r~....~..<~..i.e.o.t No , 14./Electric lines and standards will be installed by .~.P.l.i..C~3...~;...O)~-..'~.~.'.aff3$r...Lj:i..C9..8...%<.~..i?.e.: No 15./Gas mains w/Il be installed by .atoll..~..t. 16. If streets shown ou the plat are clabned by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Ilighway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. N/A 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Sonthold llighway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same· Town Harbor Lane shown on map of Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. dated July 29, 1983. 18. There are no existing btliklings or structures on tile land which are uot located and shoxv[i on the plat. 19. Where thc plat shmvs prnposcd streets which are exteusions of streets on ad.~oining snb- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said ~xisting mal)s at their conjtmctions xvith thc proposed streets· 20. In the course c)f these proceedings, thc alq)lica,t will .ffer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of thc Real Property Law. 2i. Submit a copy ~ff proposed deed for lots showing all restrictimls, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of gradiug and required public improvements ~vill he $..7.0.7 .... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity oi the Performance Bond be fixed at . ...'x 0.~ .... '.~: years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". Andrew P. Krupski (Narr~ of Applicant) · (Signature :l~lt~ ~ 7 Helme Avenue Extension Miller Place, New York 11764 (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ...$.U.F...F.O.L..K. .................... ss: On the .... .2.8.~.h. ........ day oi ........ .J.u. 1. y. ................ 19..9.4..., before me personally came ANDREW P. KRUPSKI to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing' instrument, and acknowledg'ed that . .13.{~ ....... executed the same. ~;~.~ ~,~.~!~ ........... Notary Public [lOlar~ p~a%~. $1~,~ ~i ~?~ ¥o~ STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ............................ ss: On the ................ day ............ of .............. , 19 ....... b.efore me personally came ....................... to me kuown, who being' by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No ..................................................... ............................... that .......................... is the .......... the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that ............ knows tile seakof said corporation; that thc seal affixed by order tlr thc board ofdlrectors of said corporation. aim that ............ signed .............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public N.Y.S. Transfer Stamps $9. 35 1000 64 5 Blk. 12 & 13 Lots CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT--THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED aY LAWYERS ONLY. t,.R825Z 555 THIS INDENTURE, made the 13th day of June , ninetee,, hundred a.d seventy-seven t~ET~/~£N LESTER LITTLE, residing at (no ~) Paradise Point Road, Southold, Suffolk County, New York, partyofthefirstpart, and ANDREW P. KRUPSKI, residing at (no #) Town Harbor Road, Southold, Suffolk County, New York, ~rty of t~ second part, Wi i NE~'H~ that the Party of the first Part, in conside~fio, of ten dolors and other v~lu~Me ~mt~mtiou paid by the Party of the second ~, d~s hereby g~nt and rel~se unto t~ Party of the second pmrt, the he~ or succes~rs and assigns of ~e Par~y of the second Pa~ forever, ALL ~at ce~aln plot. pi~e or Parcel of ~nd, ~ ~e b~ldlngs amd improvemen~ thereon erectS, sit,at% lyingand~ing~bex at Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated as lots 23, 24 and 25 on a certain map entitled, "Map of Subdivision Property of Jonathan T. Overton, situate at Southold, New York" surveyed by Otto W. Van Tuyl, licensed surveyor, Greenport, New York, which said map was duly filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on January 4, 1932 as Map #1103. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises conveyed to the party of the first part by deed dated September 17, 1976 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on September 28, 1976 in Liber 8112 Page 426. SUBJECT to a mortgage held by Riverhead Savings Bank dated September 17, 1976, which was recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on September 28, 1976 in Liber 7720 Page 350, and has an unpaid balance of $21,749.02. TOGETIIER with ~11 right, titl~ and interest if any. of the party of t!se first part in and to ally streets and roads abutting the alxave descrihed premises to the center )Joes thereof; FOGETHER w~h the appurtenances aud nil the estate aud rights of the party of the first part in and to sa d pre. scs; TO iIAVI~' AND TO HOLD the premises hereiu graoted unto the party of the seco.d part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part coveoants that the p~rty of the first part has not done or suffered aoything wherry the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the ~rty of il~e first part, i. compliance with Sedloo 13 of ll~e Lien Law, covenants that the ~rty ,the first part will receive the co,,sideratioo for this ~nveyance and will hohl the right to r~eive such consld- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for {he pur~e of paying the cost of the improv~ent and will apply the same first to the I~yment ~,f the cost of the improvenent before nsing aoy ~rt of the total of the s~e for any other put.se. The ~rd "~my" shall be cons~roed as if it read "parties" wheoever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN W~ WH~OF, the ~rty of the first ~rt has duly ex~uted this deed the day and year first written. - ' RECEIVED ..... REAL ESTATE JUN 1 5 l/~,,, :SFER SUFFOLK COUN'[¥ ,TATI O~ Nl~f YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK s*s On tbel3th day of June, 1977 . before me personally came LESTER LITTLE to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing iustrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. ~btary Publi~ ~R~Y pIIPI ~. St~ln nf N~ yerk ~lsslon Expires M~rch ~, lg.. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF On the day of 19 , before me personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he is the of , the corporatioo described in and whicb executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order ol the board of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. STATI OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF Bm On the day of 19 , before me personally came to me koown to be the individnal described in and who executed the foregoing iustrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY O1~ ss~ On the day of 19 , before me personally came .the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with whom I am personally acquaioted, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. ; that he knows to be the individual described in ami who executed the foregoing instrument; that he, said subscribing witness, was preseut and saw execute the same l and that he, said witness, at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. L~S~ER LITTLE ~D1RE~ P. KRHPSKI Dis~rlb#t#d by SECURITY TITLE ~VD GUARANTY COMP,41VY SECTION BLOCK LOT COUNTY ~ O~ Suffolk Town of Sou~hold RETURN BY MAlL TO: RICHARD F. LARK, ESQ. MAIN ROAD - BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 No. i( '; L' 6,. $outhold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence; 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) No 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership abutting this p~rcel? ~ No 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? No 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town , State, County, etc.) 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? No 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? Yes ~ 7. Does this property have a valid certificat~ of occupancy, if yes please submit a copy of same Yes ~ I certify that the above statements are true and will be relied ~y the Planning Board in considering this application. ~~~D-~ July 28, 1994 Signature of property owner or authorized agent date Andrew P. Krupski Attachment to questionnaire for/the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: On the 28th day of July , 19 9__4, before me personally came ANDREW P. KRUPSKI to me known to be the individual described in~and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. Notary Public TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD IIUILDING DEPAI~TM ENT Town Clerk's Office South.hi, N. Y. Certificate O~ Occupancy THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at . ~I/S. T9.~(~.~. I.l~.~b.p.r..L.a..n.c... Street Map No. J.~..0.v.~ r..tg.n' Block No...x..x.~. .... .. Lot No.. ?3. ~. ?.~.,...~ ~,....Sg.u.t?. 9.1.d... ~.i: y.. reauirements for one family dwelling & Housing code conforms substantially to certificate of occupancy builtdated .b..e.f?.~e...A.p.r...2.3 ..... ., 19 .... 57 pursuant to which ~#m~ No.z.7.~32- · · dated ......... .S~p..t...~.3 .... , 19.7..6., was issued, and conforms to all of the require- ments of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is .P..r.ixa. t. 9. p.n.e., f.a.m.~..ly..d.¥.e.l.l.$..rig .¥.i.~.h.. ap.q~. ~.o.r.y.g.a.r.a.g.e ............. The certificate is issued to .t~ .n~t.e.~..~p~.qtyP,e.~.pp. Corp,..(. Lester Little) owner of ........................ r~'cord (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval .pr.9.--. .~.2.s.t.J:..rig .................... UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE No...~VP.-..e.x~.,~.~.~,n.g ............................ HOUSE NUMBER ..... ] ~.6.O ....Street ... ~.Q¥o. ~a~b.o.r..L. Ol~.e .................... 'lding Inspecgor 14-16=2 (2/87)--7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable, it is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 E3Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaralion will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a signif'icant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Minor Subdivision for Andrew P. Krupski Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) July 28, 1994 Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMA',..~N Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered,, as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addJtiona!~L information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the futl EAF wilt be dependent on information currently available and wil~ not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such -']dditional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Minor Subdivision for Andrew P. Krupski LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, MunicipaUty and County) Town Harbor Lane, Southoldr New York NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Andrew P. Krupski (Suffolk County) BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516) 853-6903 ADDRESS 7 Helme Avenue Extension, Miller Place, New York 11764 CiTY/PO STATE ZiP CODE Miller Place NY 11764 NAME OF OWNER (If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE N/A ( ) N/A ADDRESS CiTY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION ~ubdivision of 30,799 sq. ft. into two lots, one of which contains an existing residence, on the westerly side of Town Harbor Lane, Southold, New York (Suffolk County Tax Map No. District 1000, Section 064.00, Block 05.00, Lot 012.000). Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Jand use: [Urban ['qlndustrial [Commercial I~Forest []Agriculture []Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 30.799 sq. ft.:m~,~. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0 acres Forested 0 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) O acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0 acres Water Surface Area 0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 acres Other (indicate type). 0 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on proiect site? topsoil [Residential (suburban) ~-]RuraJ (non-farm) AFTER COMPLETION 0 acres o 0 acres o a. Soil drainage: E3Well drained 100 % of site E3Moderatelywell drained % of site [~Pooriy drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYSe/ Land Classification System? acres, (See I NYCRR 370). N/A ~_ 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? []Yes [~No a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5-Approximate percentage of propel] project site with slopes: []0-10% []'10-15% ~]15% or greater . % 6. Is proiect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? []Yes [~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? I~Yes [~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 40 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? E3Yes I~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? E~Yes 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? [Yes [~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) E~Yes ~]No Describe 13. Is the project ,ite presently used by the commu.nity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? [Yes ~qNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E3Yes ~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: g]/~ a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16~ Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ;[~]Yes [No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~lYes E3No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [Yes 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? [Yes [~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 E]Yes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~lYes ~]No C 13. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled ~bt~.project sponsor 30~'799 b. Project acreage to be developed: 30~799 sq. ~:~1~; 30~799 c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped 0 acres. d. Length of proiect' in miles: g]/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/~. %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~//~ ; proposed ~/A . g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 2 (upon completion of proiect)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially 2 0 0 Ultimately 2 0 0 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ~35 height; ~0 width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 150 Condominium 0 60 length. ft. 2. How much natural material (i.c ock, earth, etc.) will be removed from t, site? 0 tons/cubic .yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? OYes {:]No ILrIN/A · a. If yes, for what intend~.~ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [:]Yes (:]No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [:]Yes ~]No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? [:]Yes ~No 6~ If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month months, (including demolition). N/A year, (including demolition). year. d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [:]Yes i-INn 8. Will blasting occur during construction? I-lYes [:]No N/A 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 1N/A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? I~Yes [~No [f yes, explain N/A 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes ~]No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain N/A 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [:]Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [:]Yes [~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? fqYes [:]No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain I-lyes I~No ~]No [:]Yes ONo 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is 'the anticipated site life? 18. Will proiect use herbicides or pesticides? OYes I~Yes [2~No tons/month. years. E3:No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? []Yes :~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? OYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [~Yes [:]No If yes , indicate type(s) T,~ 3 ~n 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 20 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 8fl gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes ]~]No If Yes, explain I~'lNo 4 :~5. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board E~Yes [~No City, Town, Village Planning Board dYes E~No City, Town Zoning Board OYes [~No City, County Health Department r~Yes ONo Other Local Agencies FqYes I~No Other Regional Agencies I~Yes [~No State Agencies ~lYes [~No Federal Agencies rqYes [~No C. Zoning and Planning Information Minor Subdivision Article 6 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~Yes ONo . If Yes, indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment [~zoning variance Ospecial use permit Rlsubdivision Osite plan I-Inew/revision of master plan E~resource management plan Dother 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Low DeD. sitv Resictenti&l (R-40) 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Two one-family dwellinqs 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A Submittal Date 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? IX'lyes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? Sinqle family residences; R-40 ONo 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? ~Yes DNo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? two a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 14r937 sq. ft. 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? l-lyes [~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? I~Yes E~]No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? []Yes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [~Yes ~[]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes J~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. C E. Verification I certify that the information provided abow~ is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/SAr Namt~. An~lrew P. Krupski Date July 2R 19~)4 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2--r'~OJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR '~'-~,GNITUDE Responsibilily of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ~]NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will c~ntinue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t(. --.W umque or Lmusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.][]NO []YES · Specific land forms: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] J~] Yes J~]No [] [] []Yes []No ~] [] []Yes [~No [] [] I--lYes []No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ~NO []]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities throu[~h a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ~NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? I~NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveye J off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likelv cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there wdl be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in' areas without water and/or sewer services · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: C. 6 Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ~NO E~YES £xamples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ? Wl 2 3 Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [~Yes E]No [] [] []Yes ~]No [] [] I~Yes []No [] [] []Yes ~'-] No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ~NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ~(o industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? r~NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? [~O E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ~]NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change: [] [] I~Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] E~Yes []No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2..5 acres of agricultural land · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures/e.g, cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ][[]NO [~YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views I.mown to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ~]NO F~yE$ Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 [~]NO [~YES C · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · ^ major reduction of an open space ilnportant to the COmmunity. · Other impacts: 9 Small to, Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E]No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ~INO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [~NO [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? - [~NO [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day) · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? [~NO [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids: · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of so[id or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: 10 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes [::]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] E~Yes []No [] [] [~]Yes []No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~NO ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? ~NO f~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [:]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? 'RqNO [:]YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 C Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the proiect relate to this impact. (Continue on attacbments) 11 617.21 SEQR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review V sual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be comp!eted by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An 9verlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? · National Park Service lands? · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-V4 1/4 - V2 V2-3 3-5 5+ · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? · County road? · State? · Local road? Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) [~Yes E~No Are any of the resources checked in question ! used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? [~] Yes []No DESCRIPTION OF EXIS'I lNG VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *1/~ mile '1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *V2 mile [~Yes [~No *1 miles []Yes []No *2 miles []Yes []No *3 miles E~] Yes []No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At worksite [] [] [] [] Other [] [] [] [] Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 July 28, 1994 Gentlemen: Re: Minor Subdivision for Andrew P. Krupski (SCqlM #1000-64-5-12) ~-- The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, Andrew P. Krupski PHON£:852--2000 SUFF'OLK 'COUNTY CL~'RK'$ OF'I=ICE~ Edwar~ P. ' Roma~ bm., COUNTY CLENK Town of Southold Assessor ~/Town of Southold Planning Board Chief Deputy County Treasurer To Whom This May Concern: The Subdivision Map Of: ~r]cJf,~.w )<rix~5~' Was Filed, . ~ L~, I~g Filed Number, q~5~ ALstract Number, IlG~O Township , Southold Very truly yours. Counly Clerk Map Deparlment CERTIFICATE OF ~_ ~"P"'~.2 ~_~_. ..... MAR ~,~ 1995 Real Property Law) ~ ) C~ 0~ ~t~FFO~K co~T¥ AHDREW P. KRUPSKI, residing at ? Helme Avenue Extension, Miller Place, Hew York 11764, for the purpose of abandoning and cancellinq the subdivision of the certain tract of land owned by him and hereinafter described, pursuant to Subdivision 3 of Section 335 of the Real Property Law of the State of ~ew York, does hereby certify-' 1. A certain map subdividing such tract of land and other land situate in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, into lots entitled and named as "Map of Subdivision Property of Jonathan T. Overton, situate at Southold, New York", surveyed and subdivided by Otto W. Van Tuyl, licensed surveyor, Greenport, New York, was filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on January 4, 1932 as Map No. 1103. 2. More than twenty (20) years have elapsed since the land owned by the undersigned, the is to be abandoned and cancelled, is situate in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, has an area equivalent to that of two or more contiguous lots and is known and described as Lots 23, 24 and 25 on the "Map of Subdivision Property of Jonathan T. Overton, situate at Southold, New York". 4. Andrew P. Krupski is the owner of the tract of land 12:689 # ABS. FILED MAR 2 41995 filing of the map. 3. The tract of subdivision of which described above in Paragraph 3; and the subdivision of the tract portions thereof ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AND CANCELLED; and, effective with the due approval and recording hereof, shall no longer exist. 5. Endorsed hereon is the approval by the Board of Assessors of the Town of Southold. 6. Submitted herewith is an abstract of title of the tract of land to be abandoned covering a period of at least twenty (20) years last past, and a report of a tax search by Ticor Title Guarantee Company to the effect that there are no unpaid tax liens against the land, to be approved by the Clerk of Suffolk County at the time of recording hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate is made and executed this ~ day of March, 1995. Andrew P. Krupski STATE OF NEW YORK: : ss. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: On the ~ day of March, 1995, before me personally came ANDREW P. KRUPSKI to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. APPROVAL BY ASSESSOR FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF MAPPED PROPERTY WITHIN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, STATE OF NEW YORK I, SCOTT RUSSELL, Chairman of the Board of Assessor's of the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, has examined and reviewed the Certificate of Abandonment attached herewith, and according to my best information and belief, the petitioner has met all requirements of the laws governing the abandonment of lots, if any, on said filed map. THEREFORE, I, the undersigned, Chairman of the Board of Assessor's of the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, do hereby consent and approve the attached Certificate of Abandonment, which is to be promptly filed in the Office of the Clerk of Suffolk County, at Riverhead, New York. Signed this 14th day of March, 1995, at Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, Suffolk County, New York. ~n of the Board of Assessor's of the Town of Southold n to before me this day of March, 1995. CLAIRE L. GLEW No. 4879505 Gem Qualified m Suffolk County ,~)'~ mi~on Exp,es December 8. IL.C. $outhold Town Pl~ ~ing Board 3 February 6, 1995 Six (6) final subdivision maps, two (2) mylar maps must be sub- mitted. All maps must contain the following: A. A valid stamp of approval from the Health Department; B. A notation that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions was filed pertaining to the subdivision. The notation must include the liber and page number of the filed document. 2. Three (3) copies of the final road and drainage plan dated March 9, 1993 must be submitted. The Performance Guarantee in the amount of $22,975.00 and the administration fee in the amount of $l,378.00 must be submitted in a form acceptable to the Town; or The improvements contained in the bond estimate dated Sept- ember 29, 1994, must be completed prior to endorsement of the final map. (Please refer to the Board's letter of December 7, 1994, in regard to the street sign included in the bond estimate.) The administration fee in the amount of $1,378.00 must be paid prior to the start of any construction. The Declaration Of Covenants and Restrictions required by the Planning Board must be recorded. A copy of the recorded document must be submitted. The Park and Playground fee in the amount of $4,000.00 ($2,000.00 per vacant lot) must be paid. Mr. Latham: Second the motion. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. Ail in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Ward: Andrew Krupski -- This minor subdivision is for 2 lots on 30,799 square feet located on the west side of T~wn Harbor Lane in Southold. SCTM~ 1000--64--]2 & ]3. Is the applicant or agent for the applicant here? Richard Lark: Richard Lark, Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, for the applicant. Also, Mr. Krups!fi is here to answer any questions that the Board might have. The application is pretty self explanatory and I just ask that if your Board has any questions, Mr. Krupski is here to answer and I just move for it's approval. Mr. Ward: OK, anybody else like to address the Board on this particular subdivision? If not, what's the pleasure of the Board? Mr. Orlowski: I make a motion to close the hearing. $outhold Town Pll ~ing Board February 6, 1995 Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Ail in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Orlowski: I also make a motion that WHEREAS, Andrew Krupski is the owner of the property known and designated as SCTM~ 1000-64-5-12 & 13, located on the west side Town Harbor Lane in Southold; and WHEREAS, this proposed minor subdivision, to be known as minor subdivision for Andrew Krupski, is for 2 lots on 30,799 square feet;and WHEREAS, a variance to the zoning ordinance was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on April 27, 1983; and of WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on October 3, 1994; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York, on February 6, 1995; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated Nobember 15, 199~. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Ail in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. (Chairman endorsed surveys) Mr. Wa~-Frederick and Bernardine Bauser -- This lot line change is to merge a~=~20 square foot parce ' na e --~% Park and Playground f~~onl~ Bay Cove, with an adjacent ~arcel located in Peconic. The park and play~g~ designation is~be removed and replaced with a Scen],e-~Easement designation. SCT~q'f~I_000--86--4--l.7 &~ 1 9 RICHARI~ F. LARK I~ARY LOU FOLTS RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAIN ROAD - F~ O. BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 February 3, 1995 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 $outhold, New York 11971 ATT: Richard G. Ward, Chairman RE: Minor Subdivision for Andrew P. Krupski SCTM #1000-064.00-05.00-012.000 Dear Mr. Ward: Pursuant to the resolution adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on August 22, 1994, I am enclosing Check No. 1268 of Andrew P. Krupski, payable to the Town of Southold, in the amount of $2,000.00 for the park and playground fee. RFL/bd Enclosure Very tr~u~y yours, R-lchard F. ~ U]]I FEB 6 ! 95 : ~ L, ........ Notice of Pubfic He,ring ~[ no~h, south, east and west by I~d~ L 7:35 P.~. ~i~ pubic ~m~ for~ ~of Mattituck, in said County, being duly sworn, ~ay~ that he/she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly Newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for ! weeks successively, commencing on the 2~ day of Sworn to before me this/~.[ L/ : PLANNING BOAJU) OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Sec- :-tlon 276 of the Town Law, a public hearing will be held by . the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in i~.Imid Town on the 6th day of iFebruary, 1995 on the question of the following: - 7:30 P.M. Final Public hear- ~ing for the proposed lot line chang6 f6r ~2onrad Bagenski, in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, 'County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-108-3 -9. ~,~! The property is bordered on the north by land now or for- merly of Cross; on the east by i J_an d now or formerly of Lowe; on southeast by land now or formerly of Krespach; on the south by Main Road, on the : west by land now or formerly · 9fAdel and by land now or for- ~:~erly of St~pnoski; and on the COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ss: n~ortl(, 'south, east and west by land now or formerly of Kaolin. 7:35 p.m. Final public hear- ing for the proposed minor sub- division for Andrew Krupski, in Southold, town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-64-5-12 & 13. The properly is bordered on the north by Town Harbor Lane; on the east by land now or formerly of William McCarthy and wife; on the southeast by land now or for- merly of Andrew Berger and John Sullivan; on the south by land now or formerly of John F .and Linda M. Martin; and on the west by land now or for- merly of Loveridge. 7:40 p.m. Final public hear- ing on the lot line change for Bauser, in Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-86-4-1.7 & 1.9. The property is bordered on the north by land now or for- Tim Kelly, being duly sworn, says that he is the Editor, of the TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suf folk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is 'a printed copy, has been published in said Traveler-Watchman once each week for / ........................................................................ weeks successively?~ommencing on the ....~..~.~... da,, '-~ , y ......... ~z-~--'~- __..~ ................... ,l~...'J.. Sworn to bef0;'e me this ........ .%.....7 .......... day of ................... ......................, ~ Notary Public Scheider; on the east by Indian [BARBARA A SCHNEI""" Neck Lane; on the south by / ~ . ur.n land n ..... / ~OTARY PU~UC, State of Now York Lawre uw o.r ~or.meny or~ No. 4806846 land now or formerly of: Koroleski; and on the north- west by land now or formerly of Monica Kneuer. I 7:45 p.m. Final public hear- lng on the lot line change for I John H. and James McNeil, in ' Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax I Map Number 1000-103-13-16, 18.1, 19,20,21,22. The property is bordered on the north by Pequash Ave., J (Fleets Neck Road); off the east by land now or formerly of J. Gadomski & A.E. Piccolo; on the southeast by land now or formerly of D.G. Walsh & J. I O Keefe on the south by West Creek Road; and on the west by Old Pasture Road. I BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANN' OBOARD i L Richard G. Ward, Chairman merly of Ralph and Elizabeth PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516 765-1938 Janua~ 10,1995 Richard Lark, Esq. P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Minor subdivision for Andrew Krupski SCTM# 1000-64-5-12 & 13 Dear Mr. Lark: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at meeting held on Monday, January 9, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, February 6, 1995 at 7:35 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated November I 5, 1994. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman RICHARD E LARK MARY LOU FOLTS RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAIN ROAD - R O. BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 TELEPHONE 516 734-6807 January 6, 1995 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Richard G. Ward, Chairman RE: Minor Subdivision for Andrew P. Krupski SCTM ~1000-064.00-05.00-012.000 Dear Mr. Ward: In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing two mylars and five paper prints of the Minor Subdivision Map for Andrew P. Krupski prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. dated Nov. 15, 1994. It is my understanding you will try to place this matter on the Planning Board agenda for January 9, 1995. RFL/bd Enclosures Very truly yours, SOUTHOLD TOWN P~NNING BOARD SOUTHOLD FIRE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 908, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 October 18, 1994 Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Office PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Andrew Krupski, 1000-64-05-12 Dear Mr. Ward: This is to notify you that the Southold Fire District Board of Commissioners has reviewed the survey for the above mentioned parcel. At this time, there is no need for fire- wells on this property. The Board of Commissioners feel that there is adequate fire protection for that area. Sincerely, Cynthia Caprise Secretary SOUTHOLD TOV,!N pL,~NI~!N (] ,r~ 0)~ ~,'D .I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 4, 1994 Richard F. Lark, Esq. P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Minor subdivision for Andrew Krupski SCTM# 1000-64-5-12 Dear Mr. Lark: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 3, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the StaLe Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency, and as lead agency make a determJnatJon of non-significance, and gmnL a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward ~ Chairman enc. cc: Zoning Board of Appeals PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mad~ S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant October 3, 1994 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed minor subdivision for Andrew Krupski SCTM#: 1000-64-5-12 & 13 Location: West side of Town Harbor Lane, Southold SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted ( X ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: Minor subdivision of 30,799 square foot parcel into 2 lots; 14,937 square feet and 15,862 square feet. Variance for approval of two lots having insufficient area and width was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on April 27, 1983, Appl No. 3106. Page 2 SEQRA Negative Declaration - Andrew Krupski October 3, 1994 Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. There has not been any correspondence from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516)765-1938 CC: Langdon Marsh, DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. of Health Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Applicant Jim Monsell, Greenport Public Utilities Richard Caggiano, Greenport Village Administrator PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett OIlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1994 Cynthia Caprise, Secretary Sou[hold Fire District P.O. Box 908 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Caprise: Enclosed please find two (2) surveys for Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by ' (~/~ ~'/a cooperation. 1994. Thank you for your Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman 14-16.2 (2]87)-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full FAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full FAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part3: If any impact in Part2 is ide;ntified as potentially-large, then Part3is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for lhis project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 ~lPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a signif'icant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONFD negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Minor Subdivision for Andrew P. Krupski Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer July Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) 28~ 1994 Date Prepared by Project Sponsor '~ NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may havea significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona['~ information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such -~dditional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Minor Subdivision for Andrew P. Krupski LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Town Harbor Lane, Southold~ New York NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Andrew P. Krupski (Suffolk County) BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516) 853--6903 ADDRESS 7 Helme Avenue Extension, Miller Place, New York 11764 CITY/PO Miller Place STATE ZIP CODE NY 11764 NAME OF OWNER (If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE N/A ( ) N/A ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZiP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivision of 30,799 sq. ft. into two lots, one of which contains an existing residence, on the westerly side of Town Harbor Lane, Southold, New York (Suffolk County Tax Map No. District 1000, Section 064.00, Block 05.00, Lot 012.000). Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: I~Urban []Industrial E~Commercial E~Forest [~Agriculture []Other 2. Total acreage of project area: APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0 _ acres 0 acres Forested 0 0 acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 ~ acres 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0 acres 0 acres Water Surface Area 0 acres 0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved sDrfaces 0 acres 0 acres Other (Indicate type). 0 acres 0 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? topsoil E~Residential (suburban) l~lRural (non-farm) a. Soil drainage: ]{JWeJl drained _ 100 % of site C3Moderatel¥ well drained % of site [~Poorh,' drained % o1' site b. If any agricultural ]and is involved, bow many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS~ Land Classification System? acres (See 1 NYCRR 370) N/k ~ 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~Yes ~No a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of project site with slopes: ]~]0-10% 1 % [10-15% % [~]15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? []Yes I~No fT. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? []Yes []No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 40 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I-lYes I~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [:]Yes []No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? I~Yes ~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusua] land forms on the proiect site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) E:]Yes ~:]No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? [3Yes i~]No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [3Yes ~]No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wet[and areas within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name b. Size (in acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ]~Yes [:]No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~]Yes [3No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? rqYes :~:]No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? [::]Yes 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 [3Yes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? rqYes C B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) ft. a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlledibt~ project sponsor 30,799 sq. ~ c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped O acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of ~'xpansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~N/A ; proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated [)er hour _ 2 (upon completion of proiect)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing tn]its: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially 2 0 0 Ultimately 2 0 0 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure __~_5 height; ~0 width: . j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 150 Condom,nium 0 6 0 _ length. ft. (i.~I~ ck, earth, etc.) will be removed from r~ ~,ite? 2. How much natural material 0 _ tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~lYes [No ~qN/A a. If yes, for what intend~ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~lYes [No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I~Yes [No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 _ acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? []Yes (~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase . month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I-lYes [qNo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? E]Yes [Z]No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete N/A 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this proiect N/~_ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [Z]Yes []~No If yes, explain months, (including demolition). year, (including demolition). year. 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [Z]Yes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [Yes ~]No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [~Yes [~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [Yes []No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes no! go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain []Yes [~No ~No [Z]Yes [No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [Z]Yes E~No J tons/month. E3~o 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [Yes ]~]No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [~Yes 21. Will proiect result in an increase in energy use? ~Yes [No If yes , indicate type(s) T,i 3 c!~ 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 20 gallons/minute 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gl) gallons/day. 24. Does prolect involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~Yes 2C]No If Yes, explain ~No 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village goard ~]Yes City, Town, Village Planning Board [~Yes I-1No City, Town Zoning Board [Yes City, County Health Department [~Yes [No Other Locai Agencies I~Yes [~No Other Regional Agencies []Yes ~]No State Agencies I-lYes [~No Federal Agencies [Yes [~No C. Zoning and Planning Information Minor Subdivision Article 6 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~Yes I~No · If Yes, indicate decision required: f~zoning amendment [~zoning variance []special use permit ~]subdivision I~site plan ~'lnew/revision of master plan []resource management plan [other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 3~OW Density Residential (R-40) 2,. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Two one-family dwellinqs 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Submittal Date C 6. IS the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? I~qYes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? Single family residences; R-40 C]No C 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/~ mile? ]~Yes [No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? two a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 14r937 sq. ft. 10. Will proposed action require any authorization{s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ~]Yes ~]No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services {recreation, education, police, fire protection)? [~Yes I-INo a. If yes, is existing capacity su[ficient to handle proiected demand? I~Yes [~No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [Yes lC]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [~Yes [No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that tile information provided abow~ is true to the best o~ my knowledr, e. APPJicant/SL~grtl~~-~-NamLa~' Andrew P. Krupski Date July 2R 1994 the action is in the Coaslal Area, and yo. are a slate agency, c~mplele the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding wilh Ihis assessment. 5 Part 2--~,~OJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR {~"-~.GNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) "In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. ' Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. ]3. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the proj~,~t,site? ~3NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, {1.5 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will c~ntinue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated flooclway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t~. -.,W umque or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)[]NO [~Y£S · Specific land forms: 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [~]Yes [~]No L~ [] [~Yes I~INo [] [] [~] Yes [-]No [] [] [~Yes [~No [] [] E]Yes [~No [] [] ~]Yes ~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [~ [~Yes [~]No [] [] {~Yes [~]No IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ~NO OYES £xamples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? I~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? [~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveye J off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likelv cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action wil] allow residential uses in' areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6 Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ]~]NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 '~ Ir~l 2 3 Small to Potentia ,Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact impact Project Change [] [] []Yes r-]No [] [] [:]Yes ~INo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] [~Yes ~lNo [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes Sma,. ,o Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [:]Yes [:]No [] [] [:]Yes [~No [] [] [~]Yes []No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~ves ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? F~NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ~o industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? [~NO i~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non threatened or non-endangered species? [2~40 E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species, · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest lover 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect asricuhuraJ hind resources? YdNO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or Jimit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, wneyard, orchard, etc) 8 · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.,5 acres of agricultural land · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of a~ricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~NO E3YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IIV1PACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ~]NO CIYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed A~tion affect the quant,ty or quality of exis(ing or Examples [hat would apply to ~olumn 2 [~NO ~YES · Oth~,r impacts: 9 Small to, Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] r-]Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I--INo [] [] []Yes ['-[No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes f-]No [] [] [~]Yes []No [] [] []Yes I'-] No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existin~ transportation systems? ~NO Examples that would apply to column 2 E3YES · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [~NO ~qYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ' [~NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? [~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or mom gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in ti~e excavatio~ or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: 10 -~' 2 3 Small to Potentia Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] i--]Yes []No [] [] [~Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I~Yes []No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~N0 L ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? ][]NO ~]YI~S Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future proiects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment, · Other impacts: '~-'~ 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [~Yes []No [] [] []Yes ['-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ~]NO E~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 C Part 3---EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even iL the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether tile impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential diw~rgence from local needs and ~:oals · Whether known ot)jections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue oil attachments) 11 C 617.21 SEQR Appendix B ',ate Environmental Quality Review V sual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 1 1 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-V4 1/4-V2 V2-3 3-5 5+ · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available [] [] [] [] [] to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An 9verlook or parcel of land dedicated to public [] [] [] [] [] observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State [] [] [] [] [] Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? [] [] [] [] [] · The State Forest Preserve? [] [] [] [] [] · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? [] [] [] [] [] · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding [] [] [] [] [] natural features? · National Park Service lands? [] [] [] [] [] · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic [] [] [] [] [] or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such [] [] [] [] [] as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate [] [] [] [] [] or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as [] [] [] [] [] scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? [] [] [] [] [] · County road? [] [] [] [] [] · State? [] [] [] [] [] · Local road? [] [] [] [] [] 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) []Yes []No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during wifich the project will be visible? [~Yes []No DESCRIPTION OF EXIS~h,.i VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the environment. surrounding Within · 1/,~ mile '1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *V2 mile []Yes []No '1 miles E~Yes []No *2 miles E~Yes []No *3 miles []Yes []No ' Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At worksite [] [] [] [] Other [] [] [] [] RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAIN ROAD - R O. BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 TELEPHONE 516 734-6807 August 31, 1994 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Richard G. Ward, Chairman RE: Minor Subdivision for Andrew P. Krupski SCTM #1000-064.00-05.00-012.000 Dear Mr. Ward: In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing the following: Two prints of the Minor Subdivision Map for Andrew P. Krupski, prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C., dated August 29, 1994. Authorization of Andrew P. Krupski to act on his behalf in the subdivision process. Be advised I am in the process of obtaining approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. RFL/bd Enclosures Very ~ly yours, Ri~Lar~ ::o:,= PL~NNINO BOARD August 25, 1994 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision for Andrew P. Krupski SCTM 91000-064.00-05.00-012.000 Gentlemen: I hereby authorize my attorney, Richard F. Lark, Esq., Main Road, P. O. Box 973, Cutchogue, New York 11935, to represent me during the subdivision process. Very truly yours, Andrew P. Krupski PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August23,1994 Richard F. Lark Attorney at Law P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Minor subdivision for Andrew P. Krupski SCTM# 1000-64-5-12 Dear Mr. Lark The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 22, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated July 29, 1983 with the following conditions: 1. The final map is to be prepared at a scale of I inch = 100 feet. 2. The final map must show building envelopes in conformance with the April 27, 1983 decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The final maps, (2 mylars and 5 paper prints) must contain a current stamp of Health Dept. approval and must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. Page 2 Minor subdivision for Andrew Knlpski August 22, 1994 The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that it is inadequate in size for a reservation of land for park and playground use. Therefore, a cash payment in lieu of land reservation will be required as per Section A106-38 (E) of the Town Code. The amount to be deposited with the Town Board shall be $2000.00 (two thousand dollars per lot for each vacant lot in the subdivision.) Payment is required prior to any final endorsement of the subdivision. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman CC; Zoning Board of Appeals Jim Monsell, Greenport Public Utilities Richard Caggiano, Village of Greenport PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G, Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (%) Unlisted Contact Person: (516) 765-1938 Page 2' Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ('~) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) · Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, , Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: '~ Board of Appeals Building Department Southold Town Board ~Suffolk County Department of Health Services '~NYSDEC - Stony Brook '¢NYSDEC - Albany Suffetk-Geu~y-[;;~paC, ment of Public Works U.S. Ar~my- Gort:~ef~E-~gi~e c r s · ~r?,--S~De~ar~ment of Transpo~tatiecp *Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAIN ROAD - F~ O BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 TELEPHONe 516 734 6807 July 29, 1994 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision for Andrew P. Krupski SCTM ~1000-064.00-05.00-012.000 Gentlemen: In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing the following: 1. Application for Approval of Plat. 2. Questionnaire. 3. Full Environmental Assessment Form. 4. Letter to the Planning Board concerning grading, drainage and new roads. Twelve (12) prints of Map of Minor Subdivision made for Andrew P. Krupski, prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C., dated July 29, 1983. Check No. 1213 of Andrew P. Krupski payable to Town of Southold in the amount of $2,000.00. For your information I am enclosing a copy of a decision from the Southold Town Board of Appeals dated May 6, 1983 which granted approval for two lots having insufficient area and width. Also enclosed is a copy of a prior applica- tion to the Planning Board of the Town of $outhold dated May 10, 1983 which was filed by William B. Smith, as Agent for Andrew P. Krupski. After Mr. Smith's death, no further action was taken on this matter. If all is in order, would you kindly place this matter on the next available Planning Board agenda for their consideration and notify me of the date and time. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. RFL/bd Enclosures :/ APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Toxvn of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance xvith Article 16 of the Toxvn Law aod the Rules and Regulatioos of the Sou(hold Town Planning Board, and represents antl states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land onder application. (If the applicant is not tbe owner of record of the land under application, (be applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be ....... y ........................................... 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) . 4. Tbe land is held hy the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: - Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... : Liber .................... Page as devised under the Last Will and Testament of or as distributee 5. The area of the land is .... .-7..7..q.~ ...... acres. 6. All taxes xvhich are liens on the land at the date hereof bare been paid except ......-'"'-~. ..... 7. The land is encumbered by -- mortgage ts) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page .................. in orlgina amount of $ .............. unpaid amount $ ..................... hehl by ...................... .............. address (b) Mortgage recorded in Liher Page ................................ in original amount of .............. nnpaid amouot $ ...................... bekl by ..... .............. address 20. 21. (c) Mortgage cecnrded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held hy ...................... address 8. There are no other encumbrances or lieus against the land except ..... '"'~ 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Nmne of Dis- trict, if within a District, is .~~'..?..~..~..t~... C4,] . ..~..~, .~.~.¢4~' 13. Water mains will be laid hy ..~~~0,~ .................................... and (a) (no) charge will he made for installiug said mains. 14. Electric lines and staudards ,viii be installed by .-7..~~d ..................................... aud (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will he installed hy ~.k~~~ ........................................ and (a) (no) charge will he made for installing said mains. 16. If streets sboxvn on the plat are claimed by the applicaut to he existing public streets in the Suffolk County Illghxvay system, aunex Schedtde "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets slmwn on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets itl the Towu of Southold l[ighway system, annex Schedule"C' hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the hind which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are exteusions of streets on adjoinlug sub- division ~naps heretofore filed, there are m) reserve sh-ips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjtmctions with the proposed streets. In the course of these proceediugs, the applicant will offer proof Of title as requlrcd hv Sec. 335 of the Real Property I.aw. - Suhmit a copy of proposed deed for lots showin~r all restrictions, covenauts, etc. Anuex Schedule "D". 22. The applicaot estimates that the cost of grading and reqnired public itnprovements will be $...'i .. as itemized in Schedule "E' hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of tbe Performance Bond be fixed at ........ years. The Performance Boml will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". (Nan, e o5 Applicant) {~ ~ / ~ (Signature and Title) (Address) STATE OF NE\V YORK, COUNTY OF....'.~. ~--------~../~. .............. ss: On the ....~..~. .... day of ....... '...'~....O-~/t ........... 19~..~..., before me personally came ...~..~q~. ~c:~..~~..,- '_- _ . /'~' //'] ~__4 to ~/e knoxvu tobe the individoal described in and ~vho executed the foregoing instrnment, and acknowledged that ~ ... executed the same. Notary ,~ublic EL~-~H ANN HElflLL~ STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ........................... ss: On the ................ day ............ of ............ , 19 ...... , before me personally came ....................... to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No. ............................... that .......................... is the .......... the corporation described io and ~vhich execnted the foregoing instrnmcnt: that ............ kno~vs the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. ami that ............ signed .............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public Southold Town vBoard of Appeals ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3106 Application Dated March 29, 1983 (Public Hearing held TO: Mr. William B. Smith as agent for MR. ANDREW KRUPSKI and another 220 MeChanic Street Southold, NY 11971 4/20/83) [Appellant(s)] At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on April 27, 1983 the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 100-31 [ ] Request for The public hearing concerning this application was held on April 20, 1983. Upon application for ANDREW KRUPSKI and another, by William B. Smith, 220 Mechanic Street, Southold, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for approval of two lots having insufficient area and width. Location of Property: Lots 23, 24 and 25 of Subdivision Map of Jonathan T. Overton; more particularly known as 1460 Town Harbor Lane, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-064-05-12 and 13. The board made the following findings and determination: By this appeal, appellant seeks approval to re-separate the premises in question into two substandard lots, to wit, Lot A having an area of 14,937 square feet with 75-foot road frontage, and Lot B having an area of 15,862 square feet with 75-foot road frontage. The total premises in question consists of three 50-foot wide subdivision lots as shown on Map of Jonathan T. Overton approved January 4, 1932. Existing on proposed Parcel A are a two-story, one-family frame dwelling located~four feet from the northerly side line, and an acces- sory garage ioca~ed two feet from the northerly side line at its nearest Point. '~Proposed Parcel B is vacant. Upon inspecting the vicinity of these premises and in researching town records, it is found that most of the lots in this neighborhood are of the size as that proposed by this application. In considering this appeal, the board determines that the variance request is not substantial in relation to the established neighboring lots; that the circumstances are unique; that by allowing the variance no substantial detriment to adjoining properties will be created; that the difficulty cannot be obviated by a method feasible for appellant other than a variance; that the relief requested will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes of zoning; and in view of the manner in which the difficulty arose and in consideration of all the above factors, the interests df justice will be served by allowing the variance as indicated below. (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) DATED: May 6, 1983. Form ZB4 (rev~ 12/81) CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN OF APPEALS ZONING BOARD Page 2 - Appeal No. 3106 Matter of ANDREW KRUPSKI Decision Rendered April 27, 1983 On motion by Mr. Doyen, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, that Appeal No. 3106, application for ANDREW KRUPSKI and another, for approval of two lots having insufficient area and width as applied, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOW- ING CONDITIONS: 1. That all future construction must comply with all sideyard setback restrictions; 2. That all future construction must comply with all other zoning requirements. Location of Property: 1460 Town Harbor Lane, Southold, NY; Map 6f Jonathan T. Overton, Subdivision Lots 23, 24 and 25; County Tax Map Parcels No. 1000-064-05-12 and 13. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. (Member Grigonis was absent.) This resolution was unanimously adopted. EC-EiVF, D AND FILED BY ~ 'Ibwn Clerk, Town c[ APPROVED Chairman Bnard of Appe§ls (~ COUNT! Real Property 5.$8'2~' SO'~. ~ETAIL _M~A__P 0 MINOR SUBDIVI$ON MAP OF PROPERTY SURV~ED FOR P, WF4UPSt I SOUTHOLD AREA, ~0,7c)9 ~q, SCALE- LgCATIOj, l~kP ES ~ LOT NOS., ¢~NQ~,VN THUS J2$J I~E'~. TO MAP sum ~, ~EENPO~T - 5UFFOL~ gib SOUTHOLD TOWN PL.AN~_I.~p 80.NAD APPROVED BY PLAI',ININ,G BOARD TOWN OF $OUTHOLD ~4,57 O~ _0 E - ' L58 28 50 E, _ i ,CZ, , 208,82 A~EA' 15,86,°- SQFT, 558, ~.8 h11rqoR SUBDIVISION FflAP OF- PROPEfTTY SUBVEYEP FOP._ 214.16 d 0 2!4 16 pC_Abt ';C~7' ~EE PEIAIL ! AREA-- _50,799 GQ PT. Low DEt,4$1T¥ AA. 4FHE k,u'ATEF~ SUPPt_y A]4_~,. ~.F,¢(&~ E .? q Po 5AL THE ~%~IFP OLt~ SEP 8 191~1 $OUTHOLO TOWN P[ANNINO BOARD V,/E NEFZEB_y CEF2TIFY '1'14,~,] MO LOT 01,! ~AL J ,~,57 O2 _0 E 25 AP.E^ 4,q3-/~FT, - ' 5 58 28 50 4 J8 28 5,.3 E. ZO8.82 ABE/, ',5,6'6~ SQFT. EMVELOFk 214 t6 4o':.!:' .I ,i)F PF~OPEt~TY SUBVEMED FOP.. AT ]O~W~ J ©F 9'J,{ Yil-ICI P~, k.I.y _' '!,~ _TQX,~N MAF4B,.,.,,~ LAklE F/'O~ JTHOLP, M.Y I rbL %5- .; iT APE.A, ~o,799 %Q FT / V I, LOT SOS 5HO~/KJ TFtL)S L2F~31,p_.~:E'~ TO HAP OF JONATHAN ~ OVE[~TOM ¢~ILED [M TNE -" '- - ..... '._~'.z'.< ['NI~!j! l?F qEALTH] - ~. - ,. . _ ._ ~l~_ _51 LOCA"IO M NI.~,P ¢0OO', I" SEP 81994 $OUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD WE HEP. EB¥ CEETIFY rNA] ,"JO LOT I~ Ai~EA ~'~P 'rU~AT TrlI']~ ~AP COMEr&FIE, ~Ob.!'.;~.r,,4r% ~IA'vF. ~EFr ] HST!~IJCT IO,lo. " --------~) 1~ order to answer the questions in %his short EAF ii Ls assum~ that the preparer ~ti!l use. currently available in[orr, alien concerning project and the ~i]:ely im:)ac'Ls oF the action. It is not expected additional ~tu~l~,,- c:;carch or other ~nvastigations ~';ilt be undertaken (b) ][ any question has been ans;~ered Yes the project may be ~zgnific~nt and o completed Environ~:ntal Assessment Form Ss necessary. (c) IF all questions have been answered ['lo it is likel'y %ha~ this project is not s~gnifican~. (d) Environmental Asset. amen% ' '' ~ ~i~l p:'ojec'L resuLt--in a large physical change to ibc projacl siLe or physically al~er more th~:n 10 acres of land? ..................... Yes No 2. %'1ill there bca major change 1o any unique -uhusuol land form found on ihe siLe? ..... Yes 3. %'/ill projcc'l ol~er or have a large' efPecl o~'" ' ~ N~ existing body of wa[er? ..................... 4. %'Jilt projeci have a polcntial!y larDc impact , on grounc]',r¢,~er quolily? ..................... Yes ~No 5. %'7ill projecl significantly cff'ee% drainage - flo~-, on adjacent sites? ...................... Yes, ~Nq 6. %'7ill projcc[ affect on)' %hreo~c,ncd or c,]dongercd plan% or animal :;pecics? ...... Yes ~No on air (tuali¢),? : ~es 8. %';ill project hc:vc a major elf ecl on visual cbc;racier off the con]munily or 5ccnic vievls or .,~o., knovm lo:be imporlon}. ~o ¢he communily?. 'Yes, ~. l'/ill projeci odversel), imj)ac[ any sz~e or .. 51ruclure of historic, prehistoric or paleonlo!ogicel imporlonce or any sile " dcsignc~Icd os a critical environmental area by s local ogenc),? ............ =:.....-~..v....:..~..~- Yes.. 10. %';ilt project have a major c~fcct on existing or fukurc rccreoliono] opportunilics? ......... Yes. 11. %,.zl~ projec% rcsuli in .major %roff~c problems or. coune o major elf ecl ia axis%lng ~/N tronsporlol~on sys%em~.? ....................... Ye~ o 12. %'Jill projecl .regularly cause objectionable o(~ors, noise, glare, vibration, or elcclricol disturbance os o resu!t o~ thc project's opcr o'liori? ......... ' ............................ Yes. ~o' lo. %'/ill projcc% hove on)' impocl on public heolEh or 5oFo'Ly? Yes ~No 14. %~1il! pfojec[ affcci fha exlsling community by- directly causing o gro'.~rth in permcncnt populolion of more than 5 pcrccn% over o one year period or hc~ve o major ncgolivc on the character o~ ih~ co:nmuni~y or nclghborJlood? ................................. %'es~ No 15. ]& there public con[rovcrsy coriccrnin9 the ' ' pi'ojcc[? ...................................... , Ycs ~ No APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold To~vn Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be r 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follo~vs: Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ....................................... or as distributee ........................................................................ 5. The area of the land is .... .~...7..q.~ .... acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except ......'-----~. ..... 7. The land is encumbered by -----'"- mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page .................. in original amount of $ .............. unpaid amount $ ..................... held by ...................... .............. address ................................................................. (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page ....................... in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... .............. address ............................................................... (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... ...................... address ......................................................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ........................ 9. The land lies in the following zouing use districts . ..~ ......... : ..................... i0. No part nf the land lies under water xvhetber tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is .~.?.~...~.....~.~.~ 13. Water mains will be laid by .'T..~ .................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by .--7. ....................................... ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by ~.~ ......................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicaut to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold FIighway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat sho~vs proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $...' ....... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at . .'Y. ..... ~.... years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". (Signature and Title) (Address) STATE OF NE\V YORK, COUNTY OF. ~./.~. .............. ss: On the ... f..~. .... day of~. ..... ...~....~-,'/ ........... 19 .~.._~..., before me personally came ...~.~.~. to ~eknowntobetheindividualdescribedlnandwho executed the foregoing instrmnent, and acknowledged that ~-6.~... executed the same. qOT~RY PUBLIC, State of flew rel3~ No 52.8125850, Suffolk Countou~n~)~ Term Expires March 30, 19.~--~ STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ............................ ss: On the ................ day ............ of .............. , 19 ...... , before me personally came ....................... to me koown, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No ..................................................... ............................... that .......................... is the .......... the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that ............ knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed hy order of the board of directors of said corporation. and that ............ signed .............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, I AY 11 REg'B Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN RDAD- STATE RI'lAD 25 SDUTHI3LD, L.I,, N.Y. 11c)TM TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3106 Application 'Dated March 29, 1983 (Public Hearing held 4/20/83) TO: Mr. William B. Smith as agent for [Appellant(s)] MR. ANDREW KRUPSKI and another 220 MeChanic Street Southold, NY 11971 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on April 27, 1983 the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 100-31 [ ] Request for The public hearing concerning this application was held on April 20, 1983. Upon application for ANDREW KRUPSKI and another, by William B. Smith, 220 Mechanic Street, Southold, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for approval of two lots having insufficient area and width. Location of Property: Lots 23, 24 and 25 of Subdivision Map of Jonathan T. Overton; more particularly known as 1460 Town Harbor Lane, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-064-05-12 and 13. The board made the following findings and determination: By this appeal, appellant seeks approval to re-separate the premises in question into two substandard lots, to wit, Lot A having an area of 14,937 square feet with 75-foot road frontage, amd Lot B having an area of 15,862 square feet with 75-foot road frontage. The total premises in question consists of three 50-foot wide subdivision lots as shown on Map of Jonathan T. Overton approved January 4, 1932. Existing on proposed Parcel A are a two-story, one-family frame dwelling located~four feet from the northerly side line, and an acces- sory garage located two feet from the northerly side line at its nearest point, i-.Proposed Parcel B is ~acant. Upon inspecting the vicinity of these premises and in researching town records, it is found that most of the lots in this neighborhood are of the size as that proposed by this application. In considering this appeal, the board determines that the variance request is not substantial in relation to the established neighboring lots; that the circumstances are unique; that by allowing the variance no substantial detriment to adjoining properties will be created; that the difficulty cannot be obviated by a method feasible for appellant other than a variance; that the relief requested will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes of zoning; and in view of the manner in which the difficulty arose and in consideration of all the above factors, the interests 6f justice will be served by allowing the variance as indicated below. (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) DATED: May 6, 1983. Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Page 2 - Appeal No. 3106 Matter of ANDREW KRUPSKI Decision Rendered April 27, 1983 On motion by Mr. Doyen, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, that Appeal No. 3106, application for ANDREW KRUPSKI and another, for approval of two lots having insufficient area and width as applied, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOW- ING CONDITIONS: 1. That all future construction must comply with all sideyard setback restrictions; That all future construction must comply with all other NY; County zoning requirements. Location of Property: 1460 Town Harbor Lane, Southold, Map ~f Jonathan T. Overton, Subdivision Lots 23, 24 and 25; Tax Map Parcels No. 1000-064-05-12 and 13. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. (Member Grigonis was absent.) This resolution was unanimously adopted. AND FILED BY ~OUTIif3LD TOWN CLERK DATE ~.g//D/*3 HOUR APPROVED .... /, Chairman Board of Appeals Y.So ansfer amps .35 O0 & 13 ts CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT--THIS INSTRUh~ENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY. 52 555 THIS INDENTURF~ made thc 13th t~ET~rF.F_N LESTER LITTLE, dayoI June ,nineteen hundred and seventy-seven residing at (no ~) Paradise Point Road, Southold, Suffolk County, New YorFk,.! -.Dr, L0? )arty or the first [)art. and AND~W P. KRUPSKI, residing at (no ~) Town Itarbor Road, Southold, Suffolk County, New York, >arty of the second part, Wfl"NE..~it.;l 1t~ that the party of the.first, pa~, in cons{de,al,on of ten dollars and other valuable consideratlo~ paid by the party of the second part, floes nere~y ~rant ana remase tmto the party of the second pan, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second pan forever, ALI. that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, slt'aat~, lyingandb~ng~X~ at Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated as lots 23, 24 and 25 on a certain map entitled, "Map of Subdivision Property of Jonathan T. Overton, situate at Southold, New York" surveyed by Otto W. Van Tuyl, licensed surveyor, Greenport, New York, which said map was duly filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on January 4, 1932 as Map BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises conveyed to the party of the first part by deed dated September 17, 1976 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on September 28, 1976 in Liber 8112 Page 426. SUBJECT September 17, Office on September 28, balance of $21,749,02. to a mortgage held by Riverhead Savings Bank dated 1976, which was recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's 1976 in Liber 7720 Page 350, and has an unpair TOGETHER with all right, tide and interest, if any, of the party of lhe first part in and to any stree*s and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER wkh the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO IIAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns o! the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of :the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyauce and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first {or Che purpose of paying the cost o{ the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement be{ore using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall he construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of. this indenture so requires. IN 'WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. 35536 RECORgED LESTER M. AL~[RTSONI Clerk of Suffolk Ccunh! '7