Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-63.-3-18.1PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Ms. Betty Neville/Town Clerk From: The Planning Board Date: February 10, 2004 Re~ Peconic Design and Construction Application Fee Refund Request SCTM# 1000-63-3-18.1 On January 23, 2004 the applicant submitted a letter to the Planning Board requesting the full refund of the paid application fee in the amount of $3000.00. The Planning Board reviewed the request at the Feb?uary 9, 2004 worksession. The application was receive(~/on April 30, 2002, and subject to the Local Law No 3. 2002 which prohibited the Planning Board from taking any "action" upon the application. The application was withdrawn on January 23, 2003. Consequently, no action was taken on the application and the Planning Board recommends that the $3000.00 application fee be refunded in full. GREGORY F. YAKABOSKI TOWN ATTORNEY greg.yakaboski@town.southold.ny.us PATRICIA A. FINNEGAN ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY patricia.finnegan@town.southold.ny.us JOSHUA Y. I{ORTON Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1939 Facsimile (631) 765-1823 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To' From: Date: Re: Supervisor Horton Town Board Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq. Assistant Town Attorney February 14, 2003 Change of Zone Applications FEB 14 ~ S0uth01d Town Plato Board The following is a monthly status on the pending change of zone applications: Amerada Hess -Val Scopaz prepared a 1/21/03 memo to Elizabeth Neville containing numerous comments on the second draft SEQRA report prepared by John J.' Raynor, the consultant performing the SEQRA revie~ for the Town. On January 29, 2003, I forwarded the memo to Raynor, asking him to consider Val's comments and prepare a final report. I have received several calls from the attorney representing Hess inquiring as to the status, as well as from Jospeh Finora, a neighbor of the gas station. Both have been advised that the SEQRA process is moving along. I expect to receive a report from Raynor within the next few weeks. Once the report is received, it will be forwarded to' Val for review and subsequently scheduled for hearing. Mattituck Housing/Factory Avenue (AHD)-- You have recently received a copy of my 2/10/03 letter to George Weiser outlining the next steps of the process, as it relates to the change of zone. This letter was sent in response to his inquiry both by phone and letter about the process and when he could expect a public hearing. No request for moratorium waiver has been filed by the applicant, nor have they provided all the requested information to complete SEQRA. Quad Enterprises - no activity - see attached 10/21/02 memo. DBM Co. - Please see attached memo for information on this application. To date, nothing has been done with this application. Richard Israel was in the Clerk's office last week requesting information on the status of the application. At this time, the Board can decide if correspondence should go out to the applicant regarding the moratorium, if the application should be accepted and SEQRA should begin, or if the application should be returned. Please advise how the Board wished to handle this matter as Mr. Israel has been callin~_g_U3e Tcwn AJ.torney'_s office for advice on the application. ,,~' ....... ~ ............._ ...........his is a George Weiser subdivision proposed in S~~ On December 3, 2,002, an incomplete application for waiver from the moratorium was received in the Clerk s office. I returned the application to Ms. Mesiano on December 9th with a copy of the moratorium law and advised her that more information was required. On January 22, 2003, a letter was received in the Clerk's office asking that the waiver aPplication be withdrawn and the fee refunded. No further offered. ~ Estate of Grace Edson- no activity - see attached memo. Windham Resources LLC- This is a new application, which has just been determined to be acceptable by Planning and the Town Attorney's Office. Accordingly, the SEQRA process will begin shortly. The applicant seeks to change the zone on a property located at Athol Crescent, Fishers Island, from R-80 to HB. The request is made because the "residential zone is out of character with the surrounding land uses and the proposed use of the property next door". It is hoped that the SEQRA and Planning process can move along such that the public hearing can be scheduled for the August Town Board meeting on Fishers Island. If you have any questions or comments on any of these matters, please contact me. Pat PAF/md cc: Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk w/attachment Valede Scopaz, Town Planner w/attachment T, OWN ATTORNEY IC~'i'flI,EEN MURRAY AS.qlS~ANT TOWN ATTORNEY ....... P_ATR~_C_~ _A A:?I~N NE GAN ~SS~ST^NT TOW~ ^TTOR~E¥ JOSHUA Y. HORTON Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Rou~:e 25 P.O. Box 1179 ' Southoldl New York 1197t-0959 ~olephone (63i) 755-1939 e-mall: gr eg:yakab~sk~@t~wn:southold:ny:~ katlfleen,murray~town ~outhold.ny.us l>ahi¢ia, finnegan~town.southold.ny~us OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Supervisor Horton Southold Town Board From: Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq. Assistant Town Attorney Date: October 21,2002 Re: Change of Zone Applications (Non-AHD) The following is a list of all of the pending change of zone applications presently before the Town Board. Amerada Hess - I forwarded a status memo on this on October 15th -- Val Scopaz's memo was forwarded to Raynor on October 10, 2002, for review in conjunction with SEQRA · Skrezic- hearing to be held 10/22/02 Quad Enterprises - R~80 to HD. Application to construct 126 senior townhouse units on a 31.4 acre parcel between Young Avenue (Railroad Avenue) and Boisseau Avenue, south of Rte 48 in Southold. SEQRA has been commenced and file has been forwarded to Suffolk County Planning for review. They will not perform their review until they have the recommendations of the Planning Board,. and additional items mentioned in the SEQRA report (SCWA availability letter, density computation, and Archaeological Survey). The Planning Board will not prepare recommendations until after the moratorium has concluded. The Board can consider whether they want the Town Attorney to correspond with the applicant re: the moratorium, to advise the applicant that no further action will be taken on this application until after the moratorium has concluded, and to advise them of the further information needed to complete SEQRA per the report of NPV. DBM Co. - Two applications have been submitted by Richard Israel on behalf of DBM Co., for developments known as Highpoint Pines and Highpoint Landing. Highpoint Pines is designed as an affordable subdivision under the AHD and Highpoint Landing is a senior condominium development under the HD zone. The property is currently zoned R-80. No action has been taken on these applications to date, and they are waiting to be reviewed by the Planning Board and the Town Attorney's Office for completeness. Again, the Board can decide if correspondence sh__o_u/d go outto th_e_ a_Dp_!i_c_a_nt regarding ~he ~g_r_a_t(~?iu_rn~nd dec!de if_~h_ey want to begin the SEQRA process now or wait until the moratorium has concluded. It makes no sense to refer the matter to the Planning Board at this time. Peconic Design and Construction - Petition submitted by George Wieser for rezoning from HB and R-80 to HB to allow for the development of an 18-unit retirement community, consisting of 9 semi-detached units. The property is on the north side of the Main Road, east of Boisseau Ave in Southold. Application was filed on October 30, 2001. SEQRA has not been started. It is my understanding there have been discussions about altering the plan as submitted with regard to landscaping, etc. I have left a message with applicant's agent, Cathy Mesiano, to contact me with a status update. Estate of Grace Edson - On the Main Road in Cutchogue, change from R-80 to HB. Per the applicant, SEQRA has not been started. The applicant was considering altering the application to change the zone to B- General Business. Greg spoke with Gall Wickham, applicant's attorney in May 2000 and asked if the rezoning application was ready for submittal to the Town Board. She said it was not, she was still considering changes and would be meeting with the Planning Board. Ms. Wickham indicated that she would send a letter when the application was ready to be submitted, and the Town Attorney's office has not heard from her on this matter since then. At this time, the Town Board could either do nothing, consider denying the application for inactivity, or I could correspond with applicant to determine what applicant intends to do. Accordingly, the only two active applications not held up by the moratorium are Skrezic and Hess. Skrezic will have the hearing on Tuesday, and SEQRA is still being conducted on Hess. A question has been raised as to whether the Board is required to consider the applications that have been submitted, or whether, particularly in the case of DBM where no action has taken place, the Board can simply refuse to entertain the petition at this time. The Code reads, "The Town Board, upon its own motion or by petition, may, from time to time, amend, supplement, change, modify, or repeal..." the Zoning Code. The question is whether the word "may' gives the Board the right to refuse to entertain the petition. There is no state law requirement that the Board hear the petition. However, since the Code provides the opportunity to change the zone by filing a petition, the Board may run into some problems if it simply decides to refuse the petition. I spoke with an attorney at the Department of State, who agreed that basic due process would require the Board make some decision on the application. Based on the moratorium, it may be reasonable for the Board to pass a resolution rejecting the application of DBM, indicating it would be appropriate to refile it after the moratorium. Otherwise, SEQRA could be started with the understanding that no action will be taken by the Planning Board until after the moratorium. As such, the Board can decide how it wishes to proceed with these matters, either to correspond with the applicants, take no action at all, or return the applications. THISt~40R SU13DIVI$ION IS FOR______ ON __ ACRES LOCAT:-D ON SCTM= 1000- -- IN [ MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) Complete application received Application reviewed at. work session Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised sub mission received Sketch plan approval -with conditions Lead Ageno/Coordination SEQRA determination Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewe'll location Notification to applicant to include on final map Sent to County Planning Commission Recei{x of County Report Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval . Final Public ~earing Approval'of subdivision -with conditions WILLIAM J CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RlrrCH1E LATHAM, JR. Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York ! 1971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Subdivision Application Form Name of Subdivision: PECONIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION Suffolk County Tax Map # 63-3-18.1 1000- Type of Subdivision: Major Minor Set-Off Lot-Line Cluster Subdivision: Yes No SOUTHOLD Hamlet: Street Location: 56995 MAIN ROAD Acreage: 5.5802 Number of Lots: 4 Zoning District: R-80 & HB Date: April 16, 2002 Please list name, mailing address, and phone number for the people below: Applicant: Agem: Owner: Surveyor: Engineer: Attorney: PECONIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION, INC. GEORGE WIESER, SECRETARY P.O. BOX 1251 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 CATHERINE MESIANO, INC. 12 MILL POND LANE EAST MORICHES, NY 11940 631-878-8951 PECONIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION, INC. P.O. BOX 1251 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 PECONIC SURVEYOR, P.C. JOHN METZGER, L.S. P.O. BOX 909 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 765-5020 JOSEPH FISCHETTI, P.E. P.O. BOX 616 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 765-2954 ROBERT BRAUN, ESQ. 350 VETERAN'S HIGHWAY COMMACK, NY 11725 Other Agent(S): NONE Has this property had a previous application to the Planning Board? Yes No Has this property previously received a SEQRA review? Yes No Have you had any pre-submission conferences with the Planning Board? Yes No Does this application have variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes N._~o Appl. No Date Is this property adjacent to any bodies of water? Yes No Are there any wetlands on the property? Yes No Are there public water mains in an adjacent street? Yes No Is public water proposed for the subdivision? Yes No Is the majority of the property forested? Yes No Is any part of the property in active agricultural use? Yes No Is there an existing or proposed sale of development rights on the property? Yes No Is there a mortgage on the property? Yes No Does the owner own any adjacent properties? Yes No Are there any building permits currently pending on this property? Yes No SignatureofPrelaarer~/]/~4[//~'~ /////~f~or~,. /J¢d Date l- CATHERINE MESIANO, INC. 12 MILL POND LANE E. MORICHES, NY 11940-1222 FROM ~C MESIANO INC. FAX NO. ;631-878-8951 Apr. ~9 2002 01:55PM Pl CONSENT I, George Wieser, Secretary, Peconic Design & Construction, Inc., residing at P.O. Box 1251, Cutchogue, NY, the owner of the above referenced property, consent to my representative, Catherine Mesiano, Inc. to make applications necessary for a subdivision including but not limited to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, and all matters relating thereto. Dated April 29, 2002 Peconic Design & Construction, Inc. Sworn_tp before me this~,?_.~ay of~/"ZzL, 2002. By/G~ 'ge Wieser, Secretary \. GERARD M. LANG ~nterest on %be part of sown officers and emoloyees. The purpose ~ %his form i~ to provide information which can alert ~he town of possible conflicts of i~terest and allow Taz grievance Variance ;aren$, or child) have a relabiunship ¥1bh anF officer or If you ansvered "YES," COmplete bhe balance of bhi8 form and date and sign where iudicate~. D~scribe %.:e rela:ionship between yourself [the applicant' PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effec~ on the enviro'~ment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considerec as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the fuU EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involv, new studies, research or investigation If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate andspecif' each instance. NA~ ACTION ~ ~C. or\l~ LOCATION OF ACTION (include Snee, Add,~s~Munlclpallty and County) NAME OF APPLIC~ TISPONSOR ~ HAME OF OWNER 0f different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ) · I BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ADDRESS OESC.I.IOH OF AOT,O. STATE I ZIP COOE Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A, if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall proiecL both developed gnd undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [~Orban f-llndustrial I-ICommercial C]Residential (suburban) ORural (non-far, nForest OAgriculture OOther 2. Total acreage of pro{ect area: ~, ~ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or 8rushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested ~ '~ acres Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc,) ~__.5 .__ acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres Water Surface Area .- acret Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) f acres -- Roads, buildings and other naved surfaces . I acres ~ ' acre! Other (Indicate type) Io-~Jsc~_~{ ~ C~V~V~-u')~.ff ' ~ acres .~.~*~. ~. ~ acre'. 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site;' a. Soil drainage: OWell drained __l o° % of site E]Moderately well drained % of site i'-IPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land Is Involved. how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the r Land Classification Systemi' acres. (See 1 NYCRR~0). 4. Are there bedrock outcropph:lgs on project site? OYes ~No a, What Is depth to bedrock! .... (in feet) 2 5 Approximate percentage of proposed p[oject site with slopes: D0-10% [:]15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? OYes ONo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ~]Yes ~r~Ho 8~ What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9~ Is site located over a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? OYes E]No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? OYes I~]No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ~}Yes [~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual [and forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) OYes []No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? EYes (~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [:3Yes ~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: v\ L c.- a, Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name R/(~ ~ b. Size (in acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? []Yes [:]No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow ~onnection~' f-lyes [:]No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? OYes l-lNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304~' I-lYes ~]No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617~' C]Yes ~No ' 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? r'lYes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor ~, 5 ~ ' b. Project acreage to be developed: ~. 5 ~ acre's initially; ~. S ~ c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped -~ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ~/~ (if appropriate) e. 'If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed t~ t ~ %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour , (upon' completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially I /~ '/ Ultimately 1/ / / L Dimensions (in feet) o~ largest proposed structure height; width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is[' ~ 0 7- ~' ft. 3 acres. acres ultimately. Condominium length. 2 How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc) will be removed from the site~ I/\ '~v~ ~_. tons/cubic yards 3 Will disturbed areas be rec[aimed~ E~Yes (:]No 4/^ , a If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed~ b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes [}No c Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes 4 How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed-from site? . acres. S Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other Iocallydmportant vegetation be removed by this project? [:}Yes ~No 6. I[ single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition) 7 If multi-phased: a Total number of pbases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase "i month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? E3Yes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [:]Yes [~!o ENo year, (including demolition) year. ~ 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project '~- 11, Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? E)Yes E3No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [3Yes E~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount -- b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged '~ 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ["RYes ~lNo Type -~--~'~F°--I ~i 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposaff [~Yes Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? I--lYes IL"INo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ILrlYes [:]No a. If yes, wl~at is the amount per month tons b. if yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~]Yes C]No c. If yes, give name ~c~-~oc-t~ bh,~fi'-I~-~* ; location ~o~-~ d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~Yes ~]No e. If Yes, explain ~ ~&~f c_/~,.~;/e6 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid was?et a. if yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [:]Yes OYes I~No tons/month: years. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? E]Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in ene. rgy use? (~Yes I-INo If yes , indicate type(s) c~/~ 6~rs ~ ~'~'~\( oc~b i~ 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? C3Yes if Yes, explain J~No RE: PECONIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION, INC. 56995 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD LONG FAF D. Please note that since the ultimate use of the proposed commercial lots is not known at this time, we are unable to provide responses to all items. 2S. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board [~Yes ;~)No City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes City, Town Zoning Board []Yes ~No City, County Health Department ~Yes ~]No Other Local Agencies []3Yes Other Regional Agencies ,:~Yes ~No State Agencies ~Yes DNo Federal Agencies [~]Yes ~)No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? OYes if Yes, indicate decision required: E]zoning amendment []zoning variance []special use permit ~subdivision Dsite plan E]new/revision of master plan Dresource management plan E]other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? ~- '~ 0 (~,r~¢~ 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4.-What is the proposed zoning of the site? ~'~ 5. 'What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~]Yes [~]No 7. What are thee opredomina.nt land use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? E~Yes nNo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land; how many lots are proposed~ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 20,00 ~ 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? D-lyes 'l~]No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, edu~:.ation, police, fire protection)? I-lYes I~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? D-lYes I-INo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? I-lyes' C]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? E]Yes I-INo D. Informational Details ^ttach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant]Spo~or Name '-~ c ~ ~c_-~ ~ ~ ~c~,~ ~ ~ ~5~ ~ ~ ~ ~/____.,~ Date Signature ~~' /~ Title ~ I~ the action I~ in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before p~oceeding with this msessment. 5 D. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS AND WATER SUPPLY NARRATIVE REQUEST Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project, If there are or may be an,/ adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. 1. Provide explanation of existing site use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use; compare to proposed use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use. 2. Indicate the source of water supply, nearest public water main, nearest public well field, and adjacent private wells (if known). If public water supply is proposed, indicate the ability of the water utility to provide water supply to the project. Provide letter of water availability or detailed explanation of status of review by water utility. If private water supply is proposed, indicate the well specifications, water quality based on on-site water quality data. Provide Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval or detailed explanation of status of review by agency. Indicate proposed water conservation measures that will mitigate for unavoidable adverse impacts (If any). Conservation measures should include, but not be limited to: a. The use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping. b. The preservation of existing native vegetative buffers. c. The conservation of existing open space areas. d. The implementation of "natural" stormwater management practices (grass swales, filter strips, created wetlands, etc...). E. VERIFICATION I certify that the information provided above is mae to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Date Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 6 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 08/09/02 Transaction(s): 1 Application Fees Receipt#: 0 Subtotal $3,000.00 Total Paid: $3,000.00 Southoid Town Plannim3 Board Name: Peconic, Design & Construction Po Box 1251 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Clerk ID: JOYCEW InternallD: 61315 District LB HB B Limited Hamlet General M-I M-II Business Business Business Marine I Marine I1 Minimum requirements for business, office, industrial or other nonresidential usel Lot size (square feet) 80,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 80,000 Lot width (feet) 175 60 150 150 150 Lot depth (feet) 250 100 150 150 150 Front yard (feet) variable2 15 varlable2 35 35 Side yard (feet) 20 10 25 20 25 Both side yards (feet) 45 25 50 45 50 Rear yard (feet) 75 25 35 25 25 Landscape area (percent) 35 25 35 25 20 LIO Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park 120,000 200 300 variable2 30 60 75 35 LI Light Industrial 40,000 100 150 varlable2 20 40 70 25 ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 163 OF 2004 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON FEBRUARY 24, 2004: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby grants a refund of $3~000.00 to Peconie Design and Construction as the application has been withdrawn from the Planning Board. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk FEB 2 7 2004 IL. J / Southotd Town %uthold Town Cirri CATHERINE MESIANO, INC. 12 MILL POND LANE EAST MORICHES, NY 11940 631-878-8951 January 22 2003 Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk Town Hall 53905 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 By F~: 63l:765.61~5 Re: Peconic Design & Construction, Inc. Minor Subdivision Application Main Road Southold Dear Mrs, Neville: On behalf of George Wieser of Peconic Design & Construction, Inc., 1 respectfully request that the request for waiver of the provisions of the Moratorium on Minor Subdivision applications regarding the above referenced application be withdrawn and the application fee be refunded. Should you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Catherine Mesiano, President Enclosures Cc: Georse Wieser PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLLAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN II. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 14, 2003 Ms. Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11952 Re: Peconic Design and Construction SCTM# 1000-63-3-18.1 Dear Ms. Moore; The Planning Board has reviewed your letter dated October 31,2003 requesting thai the above referenced project proceed in the planning application process. The Planning Board has determined that the project is subject to the provision of Local Law No 3 of 2002, Local Law No 3 of 2003 and Local Law No 13 of 2003 and therefore cannot be placed upon a worksession as requested. Please contact this office with any further questions. Sincerely, Cc~ Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Patricia Finnegan, Assistant Town Attomey PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 October 31, 2003 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 (BY FAX) Re: ECEIVE Seuthold Town Peconic Design & Construction SCTM# 1000-63 -3 - 18.1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: An application for a four lot minor subdivision was filed, two commercial lots and two residential lots, on the above referenced property April 16, 2002, however, due to the moratorium no action has been taken on the application. The owner wishes to discuss amending the application for the minor subdivision of the two commercial parcels (zoned B) which is permitted to proceed during the moratorium. I respectfully request that I be placed on your next work session agenda to discuss this amended application before it is submitted in order to address any questions or issues the Board may have. Thank you for your anticipated courtesies. V~'fh)ly yours, ....... Patricia C. Moore cc: Peconic Design & Construction Z FE ~ 80 SURVEY IS A V~.ULATIEIN gTATE EDUCATIDN LA~/ zlSZL3N £. ALL CERTIFiCATIf]NS CDPIES THEREDF DNL Y IF SSED SEAL DF THE SURVEYDR AREA=5.5802 A (63i GREGORY F. YAKABOSKI TOWN ATTORNEY KATHLEEN MURRAY ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY PATRICIA A. FINNEGAN ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY JOSHUA Y. HORTON Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 1 ~.971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1939 e-mail: greg.yakaboski@t own.southold.ny.us kathleen.murray@town.southold.ny.us patricia, finnegan@town.southold.ny.us OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 9, 2002 Catherine Mesiano Catherine Mesiano, Inc. 12 Mill Pond Lane East Moriches, NY 11940 Re: Peconic Design and Construction, Inc. Dear Ms. Mesiano: Please be advised that your application to waive the provisions of the moratorium is incomplete. Please refer to Section 6. of Local Law No. 3 of 2002, (a copy is enclosed as a courtesy) and provide the relevant information. The application will not be referred to the Planning Board or considered by the Town Board until the application is complete. Thank you for your attention given to this matter. V/~ruly yours, PAF/md cc: Town Board Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Valede Scopaz, Town Planner PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR, JR. P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 August 20, 2002 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Catherine Mesiano 12 Mill Pond Lane East Moriches, NY 11940 Town of Southold Moratorium Major and Minor Subdivisions Minor Subdivision of BCB Realty Group SCTM# 1000-88-2-15 Minor Subdivision of Baxter at G-rifting Street SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Minor Subdivision of Ralph Caselnova SCTM# 1000-18-3-9.8 &9.9 Minor Subdivision of Nickart Realty SCTM# 1000-52-2-13 Minor Subdivision of Peconic Design and Construction SCTM# 1000-63-3-18.1 Major Subdivision Bayvicw Overlook. SCTM# 1000-79-5-20.6 & 20.7 Dear Ms. Mesiano: As you are the agent for the above applications please be advised that a Local Law was adopted at the regular meeting of the Southold Town Board on August 13, 2002 entitled "Local Law to a Temporary Moratorium on Processing, Review of, and making decisions on applications for Major Subdivisions, Minor Subdivisions and Special Use Permits containing Dwelling Units in the Town of Southold". The Local Law Number 3.2002 is attached. The Local Law states that the Planning Board Office "shall not accept for review, continue review, hold a hearing or make any decision upon any application for a subdivision, whether that subdivision application was submitted prior to or after the effective date of this law" for a duration of six months beginning August 13, 2002. The above applications are subject to the Local Law. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact my office at 631,765- 1938. Sincerely, Chairman Eric. Cc: Joshua Y Horton, Supervisor Town Board Planning Board Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney Kathleen Murphy, Assistant Town Attorney Submission Withou! a Cover Subject: Co,#me#ts: Southold Town Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR~ Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE I~_THAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Valerie Scopaz, AICP, Town Planner /~ May 2, 2002 Minor Subdivision Application of Peconic Design & Construction, Inc. - SCTM#1000-63 -3 -18.1 For your information, Peconic Design & Construction, Inc. has filed a Minor Subdivision Application for the same property for which they are requesting a Change-of-Zone Application. VS:ck SttbntLs'sion Withou! a Cover LeHer Date: OCATHERINE MESlANO, Licensed Real Estate Broker Real Estate Consultant April 16, 2002 Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: Minor Subdivision Application - Peconic Design & Construction, Inc. 56995 Main Road, Southold, NY SCTM # 1000-63-3-18.1 Dear Sir or Madam: I am the agent for the above referenced applicant. Enclosed herewith please find the following: · Subdivision application · Authorization Deed · EAF- Long Form · Transactional Disclosure · Application fee in the amount of $3000 · Sketch Plan prepared by Peconic Surveyors (8 copies) This request is for approval of a 4-lot minor subdivision. The subject property is a 5.58- acre parcel located on the north side of Main Road, 1214.37' east of Boisseau Avenue, Southold, also know as Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000-63-3-18.1. The southerly 200' of the property is located within the Hamlet Business (HB) District and the remainder of the property is within the Low Density Residential R-80 District. The proposed subdivision will result in the creation of two conforming HB zoned lots having frontage on the Main Road and two 2+-acre flag-lots accessed by a common driveway. We respectfully request that this matter be placed on the Planniag Board's agenda for sketch approval at your earliest opportunity. Should you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Than/k~ou fo~ou r cons~le/~/ion.. · 3uthold Town Planning Board 12 Mill Pond Lane · East Moriches, New York 11940 · 631.878.8951 SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK 1000-63-03-18.1 SCAI,E: 1"=100' MARC}I 28, 2001 Southold Town Pla n' rd R 80 ~o,~ (s.~- 36) AREA=5.5802 AC] F7 N ~ 1197J Ot-t3// / LOT I Lift .4REA LOT # l : 10§,549 $.F. AREA LOT ~ 2 = 92w665 S,F. :.~ .Lo~- ~.~' , ~REA' .LOT ~ 4 = ~4,861 S.~. KEY MAP $CALEI ]'=600' I I~INOR SUBDIVISION FOR PECONIC DESIGN &: CONSTRUCTION AT SOUTHOLD TOEN OF SOUTHOLD OF ~ECTIGN ~09 DF THE NE~ YDRK STATE (S.~' ZDNINGI R 80 & ~h FIRE, ~DUTHDL.~ APPLICANT~ PECDNZC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTIBN P~. ,~t~x ~5~ CUTCHDGUE~ N.Y, 11~35 'TDPDGRAPH~C MAP FIVE EASTERN TDVN$' CDNTDUR LINES FR~N SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEE YORK 1000-63-03-18.1 SC.Ai',~: 1"=100' ' ~AY 1, ~00I APRIL I~, 2002 APR 3 0 2gui ~OIItbold Town Planning Board (631) 76~ P. D, BDX 909 ,i~30 TRAVELER SDUTHOLD~ N,Y, S AREA LOT # I = 105,549 $,F, AREA L 0 T # 2 = 9'2,665 $,F', AREA LOT # $ = 20,008 AREA LO7' ';¢ 4 24,86/ S.F. TOTAL AREA = 5.5802 ACRES II LOT MINOR SUBDIVISION Soai~o~dTow~ FOR Planning Board PECONIC DESIGN ~ CONSTRUCTION AT souTHoLo TO ~N' OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEF YORK 1000-63-03-18.1 SCALE: 1"=100' MAY 1, 2001 APRIL I~ BOOZ (S.B. ZDNING' R 80 & D $CHQU£' SDUTHULD FIRE~ SDUTNDLD ~PPLICAND PECDNIC DESIGN & CUNSTRUCTIDN CUTCHUGUE, ~ 11935 (63~ P D lc~30 SDUTHDL ND. 49618 ~(631,~ 765-I797 J0'/-'/$.¢