HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-63.-3-18.1PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE
Chair
RICHARD CAGGIANO
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
MARTIN H. SIDOR
P.O. Box 1179
Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
Southold, New York 11971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1938
Fax (631) 765-3136
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
To: Ms. Betty Neville/Town Clerk
From: The Planning Board
Date: February 10, 2004
Re~
Peconic Design and Construction Application Fee Refund Request
SCTM# 1000-63-3-18.1
On January 23, 2004 the applicant submitted a letter to the Planning Board requesting the
full refund of the paid application fee in the amount of $3000.00. The Planning Board
reviewed the request at the Feb?uary 9, 2004 worksession.
The application was receive(~/on April 30, 2002, and subject to the Local Law No 3. 2002
which prohibited the Planning Board from taking any "action" upon the application. The
application was withdrawn on January 23, 2003. Consequently, no action was taken on
the application and the Planning Board recommends that the $3000.00 application fee be
refunded in full.
GREGORY F. YAKABOSKI
TOWN ATTORNEY
greg.yakaboski@town.southold.ny.us
PATRICIA A. FINNEGAN
ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY
patricia.finnegan@town.southold.ny.us
JOSHUA Y. I{ORTON
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Route 25
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1939
Facsimile (631) 765-1823
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
To'
From:
Date:
Re:
Supervisor Horton
Town Board
Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq.
Assistant Town Attorney
February 14, 2003
Change of Zone Applications
FEB 14 ~
S0uth01d Town
Plato Board
The following is a monthly status on the pending change of zone applications:
Amerada Hess -Val Scopaz prepared a 1/21/03 memo to Elizabeth Neville containing
numerous comments on the second draft SEQRA report prepared by John J.' Raynor, the
consultant performing the SEQRA revie~ for the Town. On January 29, 2003, I forwarded
the memo to Raynor, asking him to consider Val's comments and prepare a final report. I
have received several calls from the attorney representing Hess inquiring as to the status,
as well as from Jospeh Finora, a neighbor of the gas station. Both have been advised that
the SEQRA process is moving along. I expect to receive a report from Raynor within the
next few weeks. Once the report is received, it will be forwarded to' Val for review and
subsequently scheduled for hearing.
Mattituck Housing/Factory Avenue (AHD)-- You have recently received a copy of my
2/10/03 letter to George Weiser outlining the next steps of the process, as it relates to the
change of zone. This letter was sent in response to his inquiry both by phone and letter
about the process and when he could expect a public hearing.
No request for moratorium waiver has been filed by the applicant, nor have they provided
all the requested information to complete SEQRA.
Quad Enterprises - no activity - see attached 10/21/02 memo.
DBM Co. - Please see attached memo for information on this application. To date,
nothing has been done with this application. Richard Israel was in the Clerk's office last
week requesting information on the status of the application. At this time, the Board can
decide if correspondence should go out to the applicant regarding the moratorium, if the
application should be accepted and SEQRA should begin, or if the application should be
returned. Please advise how the Board wished to handle this matter as Mr. Israel has
been callin~_g_U3e Tcwn AJ.torney'_s office for advice on the application.
,,~' ....... ~ ............._ ...........his is a George Weiser subdivision proposed in
S~~ On December 3, 2,002, an incomplete application for
waiver from the moratorium was received in the Clerk s office. I returned the application to
Ms. Mesiano on December 9th with a copy of the moratorium law and advised her that
more information was required. On January 22, 2003, a letter was received in the Clerk's
office asking that the waiver aPplication be withdrawn and the fee refunded. No further
offered. ~
Estate of Grace Edson- no activity - see attached memo.
Windham Resources LLC- This is a new application, which has just been determined to
be acceptable by Planning and the Town Attorney's Office. Accordingly, the SEQRA
process will begin shortly. The applicant seeks to change the zone on a property located
at Athol Crescent, Fishers Island, from R-80 to HB. The request is made because the
"residential zone is out of character with the surrounding land uses and the proposed use
of the property next door".
It is hoped that the SEQRA and Planning process can move along such that the public
hearing can be scheduled for the August Town Board meeting on Fishers Island.
If you have any questions or comments on any of these matters, please contact me.
Pat
PAF/md
cc: Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk w/attachment
Valede Scopaz, Town Planner w/attachment
T, OWN ATTORNEY
IC~'i'flI,EEN MURRAY
AS.qlS~ANT TOWN ATTORNEY
....... P_ATR~_C_~ _A A:?I~N NE GAN
~SS~ST^NT TOW~ ^TTOR~E¥
JOSHUA Y. HORTON
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Rou~:e 25
P.O. Box 1179 '
Southoldl New York 1197t-0959
~olephone (63i) 755-1939
e-mall:
gr eg:yakab~sk~@t~wn:southold:ny:~
katlfleen,murray~town ~outhold.ny.us
l>ahi¢ia, finnegan~town.southold.ny~us
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
To:
Supervisor Horton
Southold Town Board
From:
Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq.
Assistant Town Attorney
Date: October 21,2002
Re:
Change of Zone Applications (Non-AHD)
The following is a list of all of the pending change of zone applications presently before
the Town Board.
Amerada Hess - I forwarded a status memo on this on October 15th -- Val
Scopaz's memo was forwarded to Raynor on October 10, 2002, for review in
conjunction with SEQRA
· Skrezic- hearing to be held 10/22/02
Quad Enterprises - R~80 to HD. Application to construct 126 senior townhouse
units on a 31.4 acre parcel between Young Avenue (Railroad Avenue) and
Boisseau Avenue, south of Rte 48 in Southold. SEQRA has been commenced and
file has been forwarded to Suffolk County Planning for review. They will not
perform their review until they have the recommendations of the Planning Board,.
and additional items mentioned in the SEQRA report (SCWA availability letter,
density computation, and Archaeological Survey). The Planning Board will not
prepare recommendations until after the moratorium has concluded. The Board
can consider whether they want the Town Attorney to correspond with the applicant
re: the moratorium, to advise the applicant that no further action will be taken on
this application until after the moratorium has concluded, and to advise them of the
further information needed to complete SEQRA per the report of NPV.
DBM Co. - Two applications have been submitted by Richard Israel on behalf of
DBM Co., for developments known as Highpoint Pines and Highpoint Landing.
Highpoint Pines is designed as an affordable subdivision under the AHD and
Highpoint Landing is a senior condominium development under the HD zone. The
property is currently zoned R-80. No action has been taken on these applications
to date, and they are waiting to be reviewed by the Planning Board and the Town
Attorney's Office for completeness. Again, the Board can decide if correspondence
sh__o_u/d go outto th_e_ a_Dp_!i_c_a_nt regarding ~he ~g_r_a_t(~?iu_rn~nd dec!de if_~h_ey want to
begin the SEQRA process now or wait until the moratorium has concluded. It
makes no sense to refer the matter to the Planning Board at this time.
Peconic Design and Construction - Petition submitted by George Wieser for
rezoning from HB and R-80 to HB to allow for the development of an 18-unit
retirement community, consisting of 9 semi-detached units. The property is on the
north side of the Main Road, east of Boisseau Ave in Southold. Application was
filed on October 30, 2001. SEQRA has not been started. It is my understanding
there have been discussions about altering the plan as submitted with regard to
landscaping, etc. I have left a message with applicant's agent, Cathy Mesiano, to
contact me with a status update.
Estate of Grace Edson - On the Main Road in Cutchogue, change from R-80 to
HB. Per the applicant, SEQRA has not been started. The applicant was
considering altering the application to change the zone to B- General Business.
Greg spoke with Gall Wickham, applicant's attorney in May 2000 and asked if the
rezoning application was ready for submittal to the Town Board. She said it was
not, she was still considering changes and would be meeting with the Planning
Board. Ms. Wickham indicated that she would send a letter when the application
was ready to be submitted, and the Town Attorney's office has not heard from her
on this matter since then. At this time, the Town Board could either do nothing,
consider denying the application for inactivity, or I could correspond with applicant
to determine what applicant intends to do.
Accordingly, the only two active applications not held up by the moratorium are Skrezic
and Hess. Skrezic will have the hearing on Tuesday, and SEQRA is still being conducted
on Hess. A question has been raised as to whether the Board is required to consider the
applications that have been submitted, or whether, particularly in the case of DBM where
no action has taken place, the Board can simply refuse to entertain the petition at this
time. The Code reads, "The Town Board, upon its own motion or by petition, may, from
time to time, amend, supplement, change, modify, or repeal..." the Zoning Code. The
question is whether the word "may' gives the Board the right to refuse to entertain the
petition. There is no state law requirement that the Board hear the petition. However,
since the Code provides the opportunity to change the zone by filing a petition, the Board
may run into some problems if it simply decides to refuse the petition. I spoke with an
attorney at the Department of State, who agreed that basic due process would require the
Board make some decision on the application. Based on the moratorium, it may be
reasonable for the Board to pass a resolution rejecting the application of DBM, indicating it
would be appropriate to refile it after the moratorium. Otherwise, SEQRA could be started
with the understanding that no action will be taken by the Planning Board until after the
moratorium. As such, the Board can decide how it wishes to proceed with these matters,
either to correspond with the applicants, take no action at all, or return the applications.
THISt~40R SU13DIVI$ION IS FOR______
ON __ ACRES LOCAT:-D ON
SCTM= 1000- -- IN
[ MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD)
Complete application received
Application reviewed at. work session
Applicant advised of necessary revisions
Revised sub mission received
Sketch plan approval -with conditions
Lead Ageno/Coordination
SEQRA determination
Sent to Fire Commissioner
Receipt of firewe'll location
Notification to applicant to include on final map
Sent to County Planning Commission
Recei{x of County Report
Review of SCPC report
Draft Covenants and Restrictions received
Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed
Filed Covenants and Restrictions received
Receipt of mylars and paper prints with
Health approval .
Final Public ~earing
Approval'of subdivision
-with conditions
WILLIAM J CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
GEORGE RlrrCH1E LATHAM, JR.
Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York ! 1971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1938
Fax (631) 765-3136
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Subdivision Application Form
Name of
Subdivision:
PECONIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
Suffolk County Tax Map # 63-3-18.1
1000-
Type of Subdivision:
Major
Minor
Set-Off
Lot-Line
Cluster Subdivision:
Yes
No
SOUTHOLD
Hamlet:
Street Location:
56995 MAIN ROAD
Acreage: 5.5802
Number of Lots: 4
Zoning District: R-80 & HB
Date: April 16, 2002
Please list name, mailing address, and phone number for the people below:
Applicant:
Agem:
Owner:
Surveyor:
Engineer:
Attorney:
PECONIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION, INC.
GEORGE WIESER, SECRETARY
P.O. BOX 1251
CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935
CATHERINE MESIANO, INC.
12 MILL POND LANE
EAST MORICHES, NY 11940
631-878-8951
PECONIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION, INC.
P.O. BOX 1251
CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935
PECONIC SURVEYOR, P.C.
JOHN METZGER, L.S.
P.O. BOX 909
SOUTHOLD, NY 11971
765-5020
JOSEPH FISCHETTI, P.E.
P.O. BOX 616
SOUTHOLD, NY 11971
765-2954
ROBERT BRAUN, ESQ.
350 VETERAN'S HIGHWAY
COMMACK, NY 11725
Other Agent(S): NONE
Has this property had a previous application to the Planning Board? Yes No
Has this property previously received a SEQRA review? Yes No
Have you had any pre-submission conferences with the Planning Board? Yes No
Does this application have variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes N._~o
Appl. No Date
Is this property adjacent to any bodies of water? Yes No
Are there any wetlands on the property? Yes No
Are there public water mains in an adjacent street? Yes No
Is public water proposed for the subdivision? Yes No
Is the majority of the property forested? Yes No
Is any part of the property in active agricultural use? Yes No
Is there an existing or proposed sale of development rights on the property? Yes No
Is there a mortgage on the property? Yes No
Does the owner own any adjacent properties? Yes No
Are there any building permits currently pending on this property? Yes No
SignatureofPrelaarer~/]/~4[//~'~ /////~f~or~,. /J¢d Date
l-
CATHERINE MESIANO, INC.
12 MILL POND LANE
E. MORICHES, NY 11940-1222
FROM ~C MESIANO INC. FAX NO. ;631-878-8951 Apr. ~9 2002 01:55PM Pl
CONSENT
I, George Wieser, Secretary, Peconic Design & Construction, Inc., residing at P.O. Box
1251, Cutchogue, NY, the owner of the above referenced property, consent to my
representative, Catherine Mesiano, Inc. to make applications necessary for a
subdivision including but not limited to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, and all
matters relating thereto.
Dated April 29, 2002
Peconic Design & Construction, Inc.
Sworn_tp before me
this~,?_.~ay of~/"ZzL, 2002.
By/G~ 'ge Wieser, Secretary
\.
GERARD M. LANG
~nterest on %be part of sown officers and emoloyees. The
purpose ~ %his form i~ to provide information which can
alert ~he town of possible conflicts of i~terest and allow
Taz grievance
Variance
;aren$, or child) have a relabiunship ¥1bh anF officer or
If you ansvered "YES," COmplete bhe balance of bhi8 form and
date and sign where iudicate~.
D~scribe %.:e rela:ionship between yourself [the applicant'
PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effec~
on the enviro'~ment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considerec
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the fuU EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involv,
new studies, research or investigation If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate andspecif'
each instance.
NA~ ACTION
~ ~C. or\l~
LOCATION OF ACTION (include Snee, Add,~s~Munlclpallty and County)
NAME OF APPLIC~ TISPONSOR ~
HAME OF OWNER 0f different)
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
)
· I BUSINESS TELEPHONE (
ADDRESS
OESC.I.IOH OF AOT,O.
STATE I ZIP COOE
Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A, if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall proiecL both developed gnd undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: [~Orban f-llndustrial I-ICommercial C]Residential (suburban) ORural (non-far,
nForest OAgriculture OOther
2. Total acreage of pro{ect area: ~, ~ acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or 8rushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres
Forested ~ '~ acres
Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc,) ~__.5 .__ acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres
Water Surface Area .- acret
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) f acres --
Roads, buildings and other naved surfaces . I acres ~ ' acre!
Other (Indicate type) Io-~Jsc~_~{ ~ C~V~V~-u')~.ff ' ~ acres .~.~*~. ~. ~ acre'.
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site;'
a. Soil drainage: OWell drained __l o° % of site E]Moderately well drained % of site
i'-IPoorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land Is Involved. how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the r
Land Classification Systemi' acres. (See 1 NYCRR~0).
4. Are there bedrock outcropph:lgs on project site? OYes ~No
a, What Is depth to bedrock! .... (in feet)
2
5 Approximate percentage of proposed p[oject site with slopes: D0-10%
[:]15% or greater %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? OYes ONo
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ~]Yes ~r~Ho
8~ What is the depth of the water table? (in feet)
9~ Is site located over a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? OYes E]No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? OYes I~]No
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
~}Yes [~No According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual [and forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
OYes []No Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
EYes (~No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
[:3Yes ~No
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: v\ L c.-
a, Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name R/(~ ~ b. Size (in acres)
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? []Yes [:]No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow ~onnection~' f-lyes [:]No
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? OYes l-lNo
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304~' I-lYes ~]No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617~' C]Yes ~No '
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? r'lYes ~No
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor ~, 5 ~ '
b. Project acreage to be developed: ~. 5 ~ acre's initially; ~. S ~
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped -~ acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: ~/~ (if appropriate)
e. 'If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed t~ t ~ %;
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour , (upon' completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family
Initially I /~ '/
Ultimately 1/ / /
L Dimensions (in feet) o~ largest proposed structure height; width;
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is[' ~ 0 7- ~' ft.
3
acres.
acres ultimately.
Condominium
length.
2 How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc) will be removed from the site~ I/\ '~v~ ~_. tons/cubic yards
3 Will disturbed areas be rec[aimed~ E~Yes (:]No 4/^ ,
a If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed~
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes [}No
c Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes
4 How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed-from site? . acres.
S Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other Iocallydmportant vegetation be removed by this project?
[:}Yes ~No
6. I[ single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition)
7 If multi-phased:
a Total number of pbases anticipated (number)
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase "i month
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month
d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? E3Yes
8. Will blasting occur during construction? [:]Yes [~!o
ENo
year, (including demolition)
year. ~
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project '~-
11, Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? E)Yes E3No If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [3Yes E~No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount --
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged '~
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ["RYes ~lNo Type -~--~'~F°--I ~i
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposaff [~Yes
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? I--lYes IL"INo
16. Will the project generate solid waste? ILrlYes [:]No
a. If yes, wl~at is the amount per month tons
b. if yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~]Yes C]No
c. If yes, give name ~c~-~oc-t~ bh,~fi'-I~-~* ; location ~o~-~
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~Yes ~]No
e. If Yes, explain ~ ~&~f c_/~,.~;/e6
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid was?et
a. if yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal?
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life?
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [:]Yes
OYes I~No
tons/month:
years.
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? E]Yes
21. Will project result in an increase in ene. rgy use? (~Yes I-INo
If yes , indicate type(s) c~/~ 6~rs ~ ~'~'~\( oc~b i~
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? C3Yes
if Yes, explain
J~No
RE:
PECONIC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION, INC.
56995 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD
LONG FAF D.
Please note that since the ultimate use of the proposed commercial lots is not
known at this time, we are unable to provide responses to all items.
2S. Approvals Required:
Type
Submittal
Date
City, Town, Village Board [~Yes ;~)No
City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes
City, Town Zoning Board []Yes ~No
City, County Health Department ~Yes ~]No
Other Local Agencies []3Yes
Other Regional Agencies ,:~Yes ~No
State Agencies ~Yes DNo
Federal Agencies [~]Yes ~)No
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? OYes
if Yes, indicate decision required:
E]zoning amendment []zoning variance []special use permit ~subdivision Dsite plan
E]new/revision of master plan Dresource management plan E]other
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? ~- '~ 0 (~,r~¢~
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
4.-What is the proposed zoning of the site? ~'~
5. 'What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~]Yes [~]No
7. What are thee opredomina.nt land use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action?
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? E~Yes nNo
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land; how many lots are proposed~
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 20,00 ~
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? D-lyes 'l~]No
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, edu~:.ation, police,
fire protection)? I-lYes I~No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? D-lYes I-INo
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? I-lyes' C]No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? E]Yes I-INo
D. Informational Details
^ttach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant]Spo~or Name '-~ c ~ ~c_-~ ~ ~ ~c~,~ ~ ~ ~5~ ~ ~ ~ ~/____.,~ Date
Signature ~~' /~ Title ~
I~ the action I~ in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before p~oceeding
with this msessment. 5
D. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS AND WATER SUPPLY NARRATIVE REQUEST
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project, If there are or may be an,/
adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which
you propose to mitigate or avoid them.
1. Provide explanation of existing site use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use; compare to
proposed use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use.
2. Indicate the source of water supply, nearest public water main, nearest public well field, and adjacent
private wells (if known).
If public water supply is proposed, indicate the ability of the water utility to provide water supply to
the project. Provide letter of water availability or detailed explanation of status of review by water
utility.
If private water supply is proposed, indicate the well specifications, water quality based on on-site
water quality data. Provide Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval or detailed
explanation of status of review by agency.
Indicate proposed water conservation measures that will mitigate for unavoidable adverse impacts (If
any). Conservation measures should include, but not be limited to:
a. The use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping.
b. The preservation of existing native vegetative buffers.
c. The conservation of existing open space areas.
d. The implementation of "natural" stormwater management practices (grass swales, filter
strips, created wetlands, etc...).
E. VERIFICATION
I certify that the information provided above is mae to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name Date
Signature Title
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment
Form before proceeding with this assessment.
6
Town Of Southold
P.O Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
* * * RECEIPT * * *
Date: 08/09/02
Transaction(s):
1 Application Fees
Receipt#:
0
Subtotal
$3,000.00
Total Paid: $3,000.00
Southoid Town
Plannim3 Board
Name:
Peconic, Design & Construction
Po Box 1251
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Clerk ID: JOYCEW InternallD: 61315
District
LB HB B
Limited Hamlet General M-I M-II
Business Business Business Marine I Marine I1
Minimum requirements for
business, office, industrial or
other nonresidential usel
Lot size (square feet) 80,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 80,000
Lot width (feet) 175 60 150 150 150
Lot depth (feet) 250 100 150 150 150
Front yard (feet) variable2 15 varlable2 35 35
Side yard (feet) 20 10 25 20 25
Both side yards (feet) 45 25 50 45 50
Rear yard (feet) 75 25 35 25 25
Landscape area (percent) 35 25 35 25 20
LIO
Light
Industrial
Park/Planned
Office Park
120,000
200
300
variable2
30
60
75
35
LI
Light
Industrial
40,000
100
150
varlable2
20
40
70
25
ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER
Town Hail, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (631) 765-6145
Telephone (631) 765-1800
southoldtown.northfork.net
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 163 OF 2004
WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD
ON FEBRUARY 24, 2004:
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby grants a refund of
$3~000.00 to Peconie Design and Construction as the application has been withdrawn from the
Planning Board.
Elizabeth A. Neville
Southold Town Clerk
FEB 2 7 2004 IL. J
/
Southotd Town
%uthold Town Cirri
CATHERINE MESIANO, INC.
12 MILL POND LANE
EAST MORICHES, NY 11940
631-878-8951
January 22 2003
Elizabeth A. Neville
Southold Town Clerk
Town Hall
53905 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
By F~: 63l:765.61~5
Re:
Peconic Design & Construction, Inc.
Minor Subdivision Application
Main Road Southold
Dear Mrs, Neville:
On behalf of George Wieser of Peconic Design & Construction, Inc., 1 respectfully
request that the request for waiver of the provisions of the Moratorium on Minor
Subdivision applications regarding the above referenced application be withdrawn and
the application fee be refunded.
Should you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you for your consideration.
Very truly yours,
Catherine Mesiano, President
Enclosures
Cc: Georse Wieser
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
Chairman
RICHARD CAGGIANO
WILLLAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
MARTIN II. SIDOR
P.O. Box 1179
Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
Southold, New York 11971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1938
Fax (631) 765-3136
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
November 14, 2003
Ms. Patricia Moore, Esq.
51020 Main Road
Southold, New York 11952
Re:
Peconic Design and Construction
SCTM# 1000-63-3-18.1
Dear Ms. Moore;
The Planning Board has reviewed your letter dated October 31,2003 requesting thai the
above referenced project proceed in the planning application process. The Planning
Board has determined that the project is subject to the provision of Local Law No 3 of
2002, Local Law No 3 of 2003 and Local Law No 13 of 2003 and therefore cannot be
placed upon a worksession as requested. Please contact this office with any further
questions.
Sincerely,
Cc~
Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner
Patricia Finnegan, Assistant Town Attomey
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attorney at Law
51020 Main Road
Southold, N.Y. 11952
Tel: (631) 765-4330
Fax: (631) 765-4643
October 31, 2003
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O.Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
(BY FAX)
Re:
ECEIVE
Seuthold Town
Peconic Design & Construction
SCTM# 1000-63 -3 - 18.1
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
An application for a four lot minor subdivision was filed, two commercial lots and two
residential lots, on the above referenced property April 16, 2002, however, due to the moratorium
no action has been taken on the application. The owner wishes to discuss amending the application
for the minor subdivision of the two commercial parcels (zoned B) which is permitted to proceed
during the moratorium.
I respectfully request that I be placed on your next work session agenda to discuss this
amended application before it is submitted in order to address any questions or issues the Board may
have.
Thank you for your anticipated courtesies.
V~'fh)ly yours,
....... Patricia C. Moore
cc: Peconic Design & Construction
Z
FE
~ 80
SURVEY IS A V~.ULATIEIN
gTATE EDUCATIDN LA~/
zlSZL3N £. ALL CERTIFiCATIf]NS
CDPIES THEREDF DNL Y IF
SSED SEAL DF THE SURVEYDR
AREA=5.5802 A
(63i
GREGORY F. YAKABOSKI
TOWN ATTORNEY
KATHLEEN MURRAY
ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY
PATRICIA A. FINNEGAN
ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY
JOSHUA Y. HORTON
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Route 25
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 1 ~.971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1939
e-mail:
greg.yakaboski@t own.southold.ny.us
kathleen.murray@town.southold.ny.us
patricia, finnegan@town.southold.ny.us
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
December 9, 2002
Catherine Mesiano
Catherine Mesiano, Inc.
12 Mill Pond Lane
East Moriches, NY 11940
Re: Peconic Design and Construction, Inc.
Dear Ms. Mesiano:
Please be advised that your application to waive the provisions of the
moratorium is incomplete. Please refer to Section 6. of Local Law No. 3 of 2002,
(a copy is enclosed as a courtesy) and provide the relevant information. The
application will not be referred to the Planning Board or considered by the Town
Board until the application is complete.
Thank you for your attention given to this matter.
V/~ruly yours,
PAF/md
cc: Town Board
Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk
Valede Scopaz, Town Planner
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
Chairman
RICHARD CAGGIANO
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
MARTIN SIDOR, JR.
P.O. Box 1179
Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
Southold, New York 11971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1938
Fax (631) 765-3136
August 20, 2002
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Catherine Mesiano
12 Mill Pond Lane
East Moriches, NY 11940
Town of Southold Moratorium Major and Minor Subdivisions
Minor Subdivision of BCB Realty Group SCTM# 1000-88-2-15
Minor Subdivision of Baxter at G-rifting Street SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3
Minor Subdivision of Ralph Caselnova SCTM# 1000-18-3-9.8 &9.9
Minor Subdivision of Nickart Realty SCTM# 1000-52-2-13
Minor Subdivision of Peconic Design and Construction SCTM# 1000-63-3-18.1
Major Subdivision Bayvicw Overlook. SCTM# 1000-79-5-20.6 & 20.7
Dear Ms. Mesiano:
As you are the agent for the above applications please be advised that a Local Law was adopted at
the regular meeting of the Southold Town Board on August 13, 2002 entitled "Local Law to a
Temporary Moratorium on Processing, Review of, and making decisions on applications for
Major Subdivisions, Minor Subdivisions and Special Use Permits containing Dwelling Units in
the Town of Southold". The Local Law Number 3.2002 is attached.
The Local Law states that the Planning Board Office "shall not accept for review, continue
review, hold a hearing or make any decision upon any application for a subdivision, whether that
subdivision application was submitted prior to or after the effective date of this law" for a
duration of six months beginning August 13, 2002. The above applications are subject to the
Local Law. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact my office at 631,765-
1938.
Sincerely,
Chairman
Eric.
Cc:
Joshua Y Horton, Supervisor
Town Board
Planning Board
Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney
Kathleen Murphy, Assistant Town Attorney
Submission Withou! a Cover
Subject:
Co,#me#ts:
Southold Town
Planning Board
PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR~
Chairman
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
GEORGE RITCHIE I~_THAM, JR.
RICHARD CAGGIANO
P.O. Box 1179
Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
Southold, New York 11971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1938
Fax (631) 765-3136
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk
Valerie Scopaz, AICP, Town Planner /~
May 2, 2002
Minor Subdivision Application of Peconic Design & Construction,
Inc. - SCTM#1000-63 -3 -18.1
For your information, Peconic Design & Construction, Inc. has filed a Minor Subdivision
Application for the same property for which they are requesting a Change-of-Zone
Application.
VS:ck
SttbntLs'sion Withou! a Cover LeHer
Date:
OCATHERINE MESlANO,
Licensed Real Estate Broker
Real Estate Consultant
April 16, 2002
Town of Southold
Planning Board
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971-0959
RE:
Minor Subdivision Application - Peconic Design & Construction, Inc.
56995 Main Road, Southold, NY
SCTM # 1000-63-3-18.1
Dear Sir or Madam:
I am the agent for the above referenced applicant. Enclosed herewith please find the
following:
· Subdivision application
· Authorization
Deed
· EAF- Long Form
· Transactional Disclosure
· Application fee in the amount of $3000
· Sketch Plan prepared by Peconic Surveyors (8 copies)
This request is for approval of a 4-lot minor subdivision. The subject property is a 5.58-
acre parcel located on the north side of Main Road, 1214.37' east of Boisseau Avenue,
Southold, also know as Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000-63-3-18.1. The southerly 200'
of the property is located within the Hamlet Business (HB) District and the remainder of
the property is within the Low Density Residential R-80 District. The proposed
subdivision will result in the creation of two conforming HB zoned lots having frontage
on the Main Road and two 2+-acre flag-lots accessed by a common driveway.
We respectfully request that this matter be placed on the Planniag Board's agenda for
sketch approval at your earliest opportunity. Should you require any additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Than/k~ou fo~ou r cons~le/~/ion..
· 3uthold Town
Planning Board
12 Mill Pond Lane · East Moriches, New York 11940 · 631.878.8951
SURVEY OF PROPERTY
AT SOUTHOLD
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK
1000-63-03-18.1
SCAI,E: 1"=100'
MARC}I 28, 2001
Southold Town
Pla n' rd
R 80
~o,~ (s.~- 36)
AREA=5.5802 AC]
F7
N ~ 1197J
Ot-t3//
/
LOT I
Lift
.4REA LOT # l : 10§,549 $.F.
AREA LOT ~ 2 = 92w665 S,F.
:.~ .Lo~- ~.~' ,
~REA' .LOT ~ 4 = ~4,861 S.~.
KEY MAP
$CALEI ]'=600'
I
I~INOR SUBDIVISION
FOR
PECONIC DESIGN &: CONSTRUCTION
AT SOUTHOLD
TOEN OF SOUTHOLD
OF ~ECTIGN ~09 DF THE NE~ YDRK STATE
(S.~'
ZDNINGI R 80 & ~h
FIRE, ~DUTHDL.~
APPLICANT~
PECDNZC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTIBN
P~. ,~t~x ~5~
CUTCHDGUE~ N.Y, 11~35
'TDPDGRAPH~C MAP FIVE EASTERN TDVN$'
CDNTDUR LINES FR~N
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEE YORK
1000-63-03-18.1
SC.Ai',~: 1"=100' '
~AY 1, ~00I
APRIL I~, 2002
APR 3 0 2gui
~OIItbold Town
Planning Board
(631) 76~
P. D, BDX 909
,i~30 TRAVELER
SDUTHOLD~ N,Y,
S
AREA LOT # I = 105,549 $,F,
AREA L 0 T # 2 = 9'2,665 $,F',
AREA LOT # $ = 20,008
AREA LO7' ';¢ 4 24,86/ S.F.
TOTAL AREA = 5.5802 ACRES
II
LOT
MINOR SUBDIVISION Soai~o~dTow~
FOR Planning Board
PECONIC DESIGN ~ CONSTRUCTION
AT souTHoLo
TO ~N' OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEF YORK
1000-63-03-18.1
SCALE: 1"=100'
MAY 1, 2001
APRIL I~ BOOZ
(S.B.
ZDNING' R 80 & D
$CHQU£' SDUTHULD
FIRE~ SDUTNDLD
~PPLICAND
PECDNIC DESIGN & CUNSTRUCTIDN
CUTCHUGUE, ~ 11935
(63~
P D
lc~30
SDUTHDL
ND. 49618
~(631,~ 765-I797
J0'/-'/$.¢