The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-63.-7-34 ~ .~.. -...'-~-^ - . -'- . <:,.OIY....-~ ~;.~ ~~::-~~.l l'~ ,,~ ~'fJ " N \'''6 "- , N Sa.. 7" = BOO' ., -.~ -.: o ~ (j) (I) }. ~ ~ 1'0*1\1 SURVEY OF PROPERTY A T SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y. 1000 - 63 - 07 - 34 & 35 Scale 1" = 100' June 3, 1991 SEPT 4, 7997 (bldg. envelope) I E <- \ o " \ ,,'v " -f f .' <='00 -"",'-" 5 - APPROVED of . .fi~t:. ../td.:.f. ...$.-f.s...k.~f...:.:3..... ..... DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEAlTH . DEPT. Of HEAlTH SERVICES, SU~e~K!~UNTY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. I(- .1 tit i I BUILDING Z VE R-40 OWNER/APPLICANT: PHILIP P. BET Z & ETHEL H. BETZ YOUNGS A VENUE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11977 AREA of 10e -63-07-34 = 26,097 sq.ft. AREA of 10e -63-07-35 = 29,692 sq.ft. TOTAL AREA I ' 55,78"q. ft. (0,1.281 '",.s) ~ N YS LlC NO. 49618 PC Prepared in accordance with the minimum standards for title surveys as established by the L.l.A.L.S. and approved and adopted for such use by The New York State Land TitloJ Association. CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO FIVE EASTERN TOWNS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP. - - 11971 ---.".'-- '>'~'~'- . . 'fu'eU' -.. ..""',... . . ~ANNING BOARD MEMBERS /Jennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOlT L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 April 7, 1992 RUdolph H. Bruer Edson and Bruer P.O. Box 1466 Southo1d, New York 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision for Ethel H. Betz SCTM#1000-63-7-34 & 35 Dear Mr. Bruer: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, April 6, 1992: The final public hearing, which was held at 7:30 P.M. was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Ethel H. Betz, is the owner of the property known and designated as SCTM#1000-63-7-34 & 35, located at Calves Neck Road in Southold; and WHEREAS, this minor subdivision, to be known as Minor Subdivision for Ethel H. Betz, is for 2 lots on 1.281 acres; and WHEREAS, a variance was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on March 5, 1992; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on November 18, 1992; and . . page 2 Ethel H. Betz WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town hall, Southold, New York on April 7, 1991; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and be it therefore, RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final survey dated September 4, 1991. Enclosed please find a copy of the map which was endorsed by the Chairman. The mylar maps, which were also endorsed by the Chairman, must be picked up at this office and filed in the office of the County Clerk. Any plat not so filed or recorded within sixty (60) days of the date of final approval, shall become null and void. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very trulY yours, -g,/U/U/fT ~: 7/i<S 1re~~t~O~lowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Scott Russell, Assessors Office -~.--- ._._-,-~ -- .~.- ~ ~ s,' . '~~ . THI~;~:UB~;fN ~~ LOTS ~/~?:;:p~ ON SCTM# 1000- , I MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) I t..rc:~/, t) Complete application received~f/fi',) f-J.!/fl'f tl<> Application reviewed at work session Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised submission received . \ . b-Y).. DiP"".'" Sketch plan apprQval/l>...,p[ ,:,1{ 1- J -~s Lead Agency Coordination f ot(J1'L 5f d'r' ~ q r 1-/;;;-1/ SEQRA determination (i-~dF r~ Cd-V 10,.27/) Sent to Fire Commissioner (.",C" Fu<l 5"""rol< \ Receipt of firewe'l1 location Notification to applicant to include on final map 2.13,1/. Ptci!>/~d (p./6''1/'''r5) , Sent to County Planning Commission Receipt of County Report Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval ' Final Public Hearing Approvalof subdivision i~ -with conditions r:l{ '3 ~~ ~ PfllI.-K ~PLJ9 i G~d4fi{J fii -- Endorsement of subdivision /I\s l(t,l~.v I~LI~ r.anlr.::;;1 ~~ r.anlr.::;;1 ~~ r.anlr.::;;1 ~~ ~~. ~..~- rl 11- ((j. 'f' ,.. O~. 1-- J.i=~ ~ It> -1-7/ I=,LI ~ ~ ~-tlll~1(1 I=.LI~ I=.LI~ 311~~'- ~ - '., . . it , SEOR 14-1'6-2 (2/87]-7c (. Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aWare of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly. comprehensive in nature. yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Ouality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM . Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses en identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact, The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large. then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. ( DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project, 0 Part 1 0 Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2and 3 if appropriate]. and any other supporting information. and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact. it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: o A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. o B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared." o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. " A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions , e H.. ~I /Je..f?... Name of Action Name of lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date ~ '"", 1 . ,.."', ~r 1-PROJECT INF\'JMATI00 '"" , , " Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effec on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be c'onsidere. as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and pubiic review, Provide any addition! information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. . It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involv, new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specif\ each instance. NAME OF ACTION H. Betz LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Calves Neck Road, Southold, NY SCTM#1000-063.00-07.00-034.000/035.000 NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR T BUSINESS TELEPHONE Rudolnh H. Bruer, Agent (516) 765-1222 ADDRESS Main Road P.O. Box 1466 CITY/PO I STATE I ZIP CODE Southold NY 11971 ---- NAME OF OWNER (If different) r BUSINESS TELEPHONE Ethel H. Betz ( I ADDRESS Calves Neck Road CITY/PO I ~ATE I ZIP COOE ~o"thold 11971 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Separate two tax lots which have become one due to zoning merger. ( Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not appllcable A. Site Desoription Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: DUrban Dlndustrial DCommercial lOResidential (suburban) DForest DAgriculture DOther 2. Total acreage of project area: 1.281 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE SEE ATTACHED SURVEY Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Fresh;"ater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECl) Water Surface Area Un vegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: DWell drained % of site DPoorly drained % of site b, If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYL land Classification System! N/A acres, (See 1 NYCRR 370). "" 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site! DYes [JlINo a. What is depth to bedrock! (in feet) DRural (non-farm) PRESENTl Y N I A acres N/A N/A acres AFTER COMPLETION N/ A acres N/A N/A See Survey acres acres acres See survey See survey N/A acres acres acres See survey N.A. acres acres acres Se~ sruvev N/A acres See survey acres acres N/A acres Brown dirt il9Moderately well drained % of site 2 5. ~pproximate percentag.A"oposed J"., site with slopes: O. Yo L 0 'PLEASJ,: NOTE HIGH CO'PfOUR LI' rn~o o~ . 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? DYes JtJNo ( '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9. 10. 11. 010-15% % % DYes KINo Is site located over a primary. principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes lXINo Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes DNo According to Identify each species Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Il\1Yes DNo Describe Creek front flYes DNo 12. 13. Is the project site presently used'. by the communit( or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes KINo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes lONo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/ A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. ( Is the site served by existing public utilities? Il\1Yes DNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? flYes DNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DYes 'JNo Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Section 303 and 304? DYes ggNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6171 DYes I.JNo 18. Markets Law, Article 25-AA, 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes DiNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) ~E ATTACHED SURVEY a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped acres. d. length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion. indicate percent of expansion proposed %;. f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially C' Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; ;. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. length. 3 ." '" t..-. ." '''-. ~,. . (.. ((~ 2. How much natural r )rial (i.e.. rO earth, etc.) will be removJrom the U N/ A tons/cubic yar~s. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes DNo DlN/A a. If yes, for what intende': purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? N/ A acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes IONo 8. 9. 10. 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction _Unls.no..!ro..- months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Will blasting OCcur during construction? DYes IKlNo Number of jobs generated: during construction Number of jobs eliminated by this project Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? (number). month month DYes year. (including demolition). year. DNo ; after project is complete 11. DYes IKJNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes IXINo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid wa~te disposal involved? (jljYes DNo Type Cesspool 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? DYes DNo Explain N / A 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes (jljNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes IXINo a. If yes, what is the amoun't per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes OIINo c. If yes, give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes DNo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes DNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years, 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes KINo 19. Will project rQutinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes I!!INo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ,ambient noise levels? DYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? DYes UNo If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/ A gallons/minute, 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve local, State or Federal funding? DYes ltlNo If Yes, explain UNo L l 4 -",.-,---~':""";~~,,.,.-;--,,~-~-:-,::;, C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? lOYes DNo If Yes, indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment ~zoning variance Dspecial use permit Dsubdivision Onew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother What is the zoning c1a;sification(s)of the site? R- 40 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? ( . 2. 3. 4. 5. ( 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. is.' .Approvals Requiredj . . City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town'Zoning Board City, County Health Depaltment Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies " Typli Submittal Date . DYes DYes K]Yes K]Yes j[JNo flNo DNo DNo VaT; ::Ince 7/26/91 When App1icat Setoff DYes j[JNo DYes !lJYes DYes flNo DNo 19No ~artme~i of E~vironmental serva on - ar1ance 8/8/91 Dsite plan R- 40 What is the proposed zoning of the site? What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? KJYes DNo What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a Y. mile radius of proposed action? R-40 D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify th~e information provided above is true to the best of my knowiedge . APPlocant/~~~-:~ruer Date 8//'-1/91 Signalur'\#' ~ k /V/~ Title Air"nt If the action IS in the astal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coaslal Assessmenl Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 ,. . .-....;..... Is the proposed action compatible with adjOining/surrounding land uses within a Y. mile? KJYes DNo If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Will proposed action require any authorization(sJ for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes IKINo Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection]? eYes DlNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes DNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? DYes l[]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes DNo l (..;t 2-PR~CT IMPACTS AND(~IR MA( 'lITUDE Responsibility of Lead Ag<!Ttf:'y , General Information (Read Carefully) . In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonablel The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst, . Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance, Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further, . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshOld of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3, . The impacts of each project. on each site, in each locality, will vary, Therefore, the examples are iIIustTative and have been offered as guidance, They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question, . The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question, . In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects, Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2, Answer Ves if there will be any in'pact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Ves answers. c. If answering Ves to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occurbutthreshold is lo';'er than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by changers) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Ves box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? DNa DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. . Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feel. . Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. . Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. . Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. . Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. . Construction in a designated floodway. . Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t,. ....y un,que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i,e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)DNO DVES . Specific land forms: 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo Cl 0 OVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 OVes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo ( L \... . fi . { IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Developable area of site contains a protected water body. o Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. o Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. o Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. o Other impacts: . 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. o Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. o Other impacts: ( 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. . Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. o Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. . Construction or operation czusing any contamination of a water supply system. o Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. o Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. o Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. o Proposed Action will likely cau"" siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the exte~t that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natured conditions. o Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. . Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. o Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. o Other impacts: l 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or ~~ru~? D~ Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would change flood water flows. , surface DYES 7 1 2 3 Small. to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNa D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes' DNa D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D 0 DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo "',-. (:" 1 . Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. . Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. . Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? DNO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. . Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. . Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed Sibs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS a. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? DNO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Reduction of one or more species listed on the New Vork or Federal list, using the site, Over or near site or found on the site. . Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. , Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. 'Other imp~cts: Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? DNO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10. acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? DNO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 fhe proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural und (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, elc.) 8 r(~ . 12 3 S.....""II to Polential Can Impact Be Moderate . 'Large Miti'gated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes ONe 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONe 0 0 oVes ONo 0 0 oVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 oVes ONo 0 0 oVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo ( ( [ r I (( ~ J- i LC-- '. '. . 1# . 1 2 3 Small 'to Potential' , Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Cl'lange 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes' ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo ., ( . Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. . The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. . The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? DNa DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix 8.) Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. . Proposed land u.ses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. ( . Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places, . Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. . Proposed Action will Occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quanbty or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? hamples that would apply to column 2 DNa DYES _ l . The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. . A major reduction of an open space important to the community. . Other impacts: 9 IMPACT ON()NSPORT())N 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? DNa DYES hamples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low' level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous. highly reactive, radioactive. irritating, infectious. etc.) ')torclge facilities for one million or more gallons of liquifted natural ~as or other flammable liquids, Proposed olction may result in the excavation or other disturbance ''''thsn 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous '.\'41st('. OthN impacts: DYES {r .. . . '2 '3 .. ) Small to jJotential Can,lmpact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change, r I' 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo ,r 0 0 DYes DNo '-, 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNO I '-- 0 0 DYes oNo , , , '- ( Examples that would apply to column 2 . Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods, . Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems, . Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? DNa DYES hamples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any fOrm of energy in the municipality, . Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 Single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. . Other impacts: ,- . :\;,.," ~ " , . .~ :1 ~ -,' NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . OIasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility, . Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day), . Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. . Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise Screen. . Other impacts: (I IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7 Will Proposed Action affect public health and'safety? DNa ~ I ...- ~ L I '--I , 10 - ~, . "...~..,', ,'"1' . IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. . The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. o Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. o Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. . Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities. structures or areas of historic importance to the community. . Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) o Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. o Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. o Other impacts: '. . 2 Potential Large Impact . 1 Small to Moderate Impact (.18. o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? DNa DYES 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes ( If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS ONo ONo ONo ONo ONo ONo ONo ONo ONo Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated, Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. ' 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: o The probability of the impact occurring o The duration of the impact . Its irreversibility. including permanently lost reSOllrces of va.lue o Whether the impact can or will be controlled . The regional consequence of the impact . Its potential divergence from local needs and goals o Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) _ l 11 DESCRIPTION EXISA VISUAL ENVIRONMEN' .. . I.. 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the' surrounding environment. Within .,/. mile · 1 mile Essentially undeveloped Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial Commercial Urban River, Lake, Pond Cliffs, Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat liilly Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 5. Are there visually similar projects within: .'/2 mile OYes ONo .1 miles OYes ONo .2 miles OYes ONo .3 miles OYes ONo . Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. . EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unkno,wn, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is Activity Travel to and from work Involved in recreational activities Routine travel by residents At a residence At worksite Other Daily o o o o o o Weekly o o o o o o FREQUENCY Holidaysl Weekends o o o o o o Seasonally o o o o o o L Ie 2 : ( ~ ( .l 617.21 Appendix B \J Slate Environmental QQaUty Review Visual EAF Addendum . ' . 14-14-11 (~':"37)-9c r~, h " ,~ i " /: / "'\ SEQR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: . A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use. enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man. made scenic qualities? . An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to publi<; observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man.made scenic qualities? . A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? . State Parks? . The State Forest Preserve? . National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? . National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? . National Park Service lands? . Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? . Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? . A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter.county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? . A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? . Municipal park, or designated open space? . County road? . State? . Locai road? Distance Between Project and Resource (In Miles) 0"/4 '14.'12 '12.3 3.5 5 + o 0 ODD o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (Le., screen'ed by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) DYes ONo 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? DYes ONo 1 .>.,~-, ""Cf;:.,..:~ -i;;',~, '.',./. '. . . 14-1:6-2 (2/87)-7c (, Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable, It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action, 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR . Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3, Part 2: Focuses en identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact, The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE_ Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 0 Part i OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 .and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: o A, The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. o B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared,' o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared, . A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions ( Name of Action Name of lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date AUG I 5 1991 1 PC 1-PROJECT INFORMATIONC " Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consideref: as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review, Provide any addition!.. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. . It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so illdicateand specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION B tz LOCA1IONOf: ACTION (lncfude Street Addreaa, Municipality and COunty) Calves N.ck Road, Southold, NY SCTM#1000-063.00-07.00-034.000/035.000 NAME OF APPLlCANTISPONSOR SUSINESS TELEPHONE Rudol h H. Bruer, A ent (516) 765....1222 ADDAESS Main Road P.O. Box 1466 CITYIPO ZIP CODE u old NAME OF OWNER (It different) 1 H. Betz ADDRESS Cal es Neck Road CITY/PO 1 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Separate two tax lots which have become one due to zoning merger. ZIP CODE 11971 ( Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: DUrban Dlndustrial DCommercial lOResidential (suburban) o Forest DAgriculture DOther 2. Total acreage of project area: 1. 281 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE SEE ATTACHED SURVEY Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland. pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECl) See Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces Other (I ndicate type) 3. What is predominant soli type(s) on project site? a. 5011 drainage: DWell drained % of s.ite DPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soli are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYE land Classification System? N/ A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). ~ 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? DYes IJ!INo a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) DRural (non-farm) PRESENTLY N/ A acres N/ A acres N/ A acres survey acres AFTER COMPLETION N/ A acres N/A N/A See Survey See survey N.A. acres acres acres See survey N/A acres acres acres acres See survey N/A acres See sruvev N/A acres acres acres Brown dirt ~Moderately well drained %) of site 2 "I 2. How much natural .erial (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be remo! from the site? N/A 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes DNo DlN/A a. If yes, for what intendcC: purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? N/ A acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes KINo tons/cubic yards. 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction _Unl.scno.:i!!L- months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes IltJNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction (number). month month DYes year, (including demolition). year. DNo ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? DYes IltJNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes IXINo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? IJi!Yes DNo Type Cesspool 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? DYes DNo Explain N/ A 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes IJi!No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes IXINo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes !)DNo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes DNo e. If Yes, explain ( 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes DNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes KINo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes I!!iNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local .ambient noise levels? DYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? DYes UNo If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/ A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve local, State or Federal funding? DYes ltlNo If Yes, explain UNo L \.. 4 .", i--\ 5. Approximate percentage of proposed pro\.-A site with slopes: 'PLEASt NOTE HIGH CONTOUR LINES 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, Registers of Historic Places? DYes ltlNo ( '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes IXlNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes ONo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Il!IYes ONo Describe Creek front 00-10% ai15% or greater , site, or district. listed t) 010-15% % % , on the State or the National DYes lONo f]Yes ONo 13. Is the project site presently used'.by the communit~ or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes lONo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes lONo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/ A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. ( Is the site served by existing public utilities? Il!IYes ONo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? !DYes ONo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DYes "JNo Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Section 303 and 304? DYes Il!INo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECl, and 6 NYCRR 617? DYes l.JNo 18. Markets law. Article 25-AA, 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes atNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; c. Proj~ct acreage to remain undeveloped acres. d. length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family SEE ATTACHED SURVEY .- acres. acres ultimately. %;. Multiple Family Condominium Initially C' Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height: width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. length. 3 "~ et 2-PROJECT IMPACTS ANDeEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) . In completing the form the reviewer should be guided bv the question: Have mv responses and determinations been reasonable! The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analvst. ( . Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. ' Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simplv asks that it be looked at further. . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for anv specific project or site other examples andlor lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. . The impacts of each project. on each site. in each locality. will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. . The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. . In identifying impacts. consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Ves if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Ves answers. c. If answering Ves to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lo';'er than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Ves box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. . Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. . Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generallV within 3 feet of existing ground surface. . Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. . Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. . Construction or expansion of a sanitarv landfill. . Construction in a designated fJoodway. . Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t'. ...ov un,que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i,e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)DNO DVES . Specific land forms: 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DVes oNo [] 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 DVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo ( e 25.' Approvals Required: ( City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town'Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies (\ , ' DYes DYes K]Yes K]Yes DYes DYes K]Yes DYes ," Submittal Date Type XJNo fJNo DNo DNo XJNo fJNo DNo I9No Va.riance 7/26/91 When Applicab Setoff ~i'~iogf_E,X}.~ntal 8/8/91 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? lOYes DNo If Yes, indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment ~zoning variance Dspecial use permit Dsubdivision Dsite pian Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother 2. What is the zoning c1assification(s]of the site? R- 40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? What is the proposed zoning of the site? R- 40 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 4. 5. ( 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? K]Yes DNo What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a V. mile radius of proposed action? R- 40 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V. mile? If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, fire protection)? DYes CllNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes DNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes K]Yes DNo DYes IlONo education, police, DYes DNo ltJNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. l E. Verification I certify th Applicantl Signatur e information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. 1 H. Bruer Date 8//'-1/91 Title Aipnt' astal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding 5 ~. . . Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. . Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. . Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? DNa DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. . Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. . Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed Sibs. per hour or a heat SOurce producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. , Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS ;. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? DNa DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New Vork or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pestiCide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? DNa DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or nigra tory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ,f mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important 'egetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 he proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural 'nd (includes cropland. hayfields. pasture. vineyard, orchard. etc.) 8 ~1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate 'Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo ( ( -0 o. ~ iii.": f; ~:; cc J.....-.- /-- LC - (' " ( IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. . Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. . Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. . Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . A 10% increasp. or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. . Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ( . Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. . Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity, . Construction or operation cc:using any contamination of a water supply system. . Proposed Action will adversp.ly affect groundwater. . Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. . Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. . Proposed Action will likely cau,,, siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to naturai conditions. . Propos~d Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. . Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. . Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. . Other impacts: l 6, Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would change flood water flows. , 7 .""" 1 " 2 3 Small,to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large , Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 OVes DNo 0 0 Dves ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo " -------",---.-..,..,..,---;- - "":7''''=----'--'='''~_''_''--''''''-- -,:- IMPACT ONtANSPORTATION Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation. etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storc1J,:e facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ~as or other flammable liquids. Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous Waste. OlhN impacts: DYES ~1 \ ." 2 '3 .. Small to J;'otential Can:, Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change. Ir , 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo . 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes DNo . 0 0 DYes ONe;> 0 0 DYes oNo r 0 0 DYes DNo '-.. 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNO '-- 0 0 DYes oNo '.:..;. 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. . Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. . Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. . Other impacts: 1.- ~: c. << 1_-. ~.:1 ," NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16, Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. . Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). . Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. . Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise Screen. . Other impacts: ( IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7, Will Proposed Action affect public health and. safety? DNa L....- k= I I I l I - "-- 10 ("\ ( o Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. o The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. o The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) o Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? DNO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix S.) Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. o Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. ( 0 Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. o Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic. pre- historic or paleontological importance? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any faCility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. o Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. . Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. o Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13" Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 DNO DYES l . The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. . A major reduction of an open space important to the community. o Other impacts: 9 ro, , 1 2 3 Small 10 Potential"' Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes' DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo . 1 2 3, '. IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small~o Potential ; Can Impact'Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By (.18, Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change DNa DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the 0 0 OVes ONo project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. . The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services 0 0 OVes ONo will increase by more than" 5% per year as a result of this project. 0 0 OVes ONo . Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. . Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. 0 0 OVes ONo . Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures 0 0 OVes ONo or areas of historic importance to the community, . Development will create a demand for additional community services 0 0 OVes ONo (e,g. schools, police and fire, etc,) . Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. 0 0 OVes ONo . Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. 0 0 OVes ONo . Other impacts: 0 0 OVes ONo 19" Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? DNa DVES ( If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3, Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance. consider: . The probability of the impact occurring . The duration of the impact . Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value . Whether the impact can or will be controlled . The regional consequence of the impact . Its potential divergence from local needs and goals . Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) _ l 11 . 617.21 . Appendix B S'Iate Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum '. . 14.14.11 (2'87)-9c " ( SEQR This fDrm may be used tD provide additiDnal information relating tD Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) ~ Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: . A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjDyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? . An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation Df natural or man-made scenic qualities? . A site or structure listed Dn the National or State Registers of HistDric Places? . State Parks? . The State Forest Preserve? ( . National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? . National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? . National Park Service lands? . Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? . Any transportation <:Drridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? . A governmentally established Dr designated interstate or inter.county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? . A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? . Municipal park, or designated open space? . County road? . State? . Local rDad? Distance Between Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-1/4 \4.112 V,.3 3.5 5+ o 0 ODD o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screen'ed by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) DYes ONo -l 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? DYes ONo 1 '~ DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question I, check those which genen,lIy describe the' surrounding environment. r"""'. Essentially undeveloped Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial Commercial Urban River, Lake, Pond Cliffs, Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat l-li11y Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed I" Within .'/. mile · 1 mile ( o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 5. Are there visually similar projects within: oV2 mile DYes ONo 01 miles DYes ONo 02 miles DYes ONo 03 miles DYes ONo o Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. ( EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unkno,wn, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged wllile viewing the proposed action is Activity Travel to and from work Involved in recreational activities Routine travel by residents At a residence At worksite Other Daily o o o o o o FREQUENCY Holidaysl Weekends o o o o o o Weekly o o o o o o Seasonally o o o o o o , < 2 . . ~~~~- .:si.te>F;~ VS ATTORNEYS.tIT LAW MA.IN ROAO.P.O.1!I0X 1466 BDUTHOLO, NEWYORK 11971 LEF'FERTS P. EDSON 119IZ-19..) RUDOLPH H. BRUER 1516)765.'222 (516) 765-2500 FAX: (516) 765-2752 August 14, 1991 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 I ':J7u /"kc- j( h, ~ '-- (tJ/~y ~ ~ J Re: Betz, Ethel H. Minor Subdivision SCTM#1000-063.00-07. 00-034. 000/035. 000 Gentlemen: In connection with the above application, enclosed herewith please find the following: 1. Twelve surveys. 2. Legal description. 3. Filing fee in the sum of $2,000.00. 4. Application for plat approval. 5. Form letter regarding drainage, grading and road construction. 6. Part I of the Full Enviornmental Assess-ent Form. 7. Copy of tax map showing area. Please process the above application as soon as possible. If you should have any questions or problems, please do not hesitate to contact me at the above number. ~#~1~ Encs. AUG 15 . . . G'~ -/ rJ8-. ATTORNEYS AT LAW MAIN ROAO.P.O.1II0X 1466 SOUTHOLD, NEWYORK 1 197' LEF"F"ERTS P. EDSON 11.1Z.19.9) ItUDOLPH H. BRUER (S 1 6) 765-1222 (S 1 6) 765-2$00 "AX: (516)765-2752 August 14. 1991 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Betz, Ethel H. SCTM#1000-063. 00-07.00-034.000/035. 000 Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: 1. No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. 2. No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. 3. No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Sincerely, '1', I 5 ' .. 1i -.-...::;:,:- " , , . . APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of South old : The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) Rudolph H. Bruer. Agent 2 Th f h bd' .. . bEthel H. Betz '.' . e name 0 t e su IVlSlon IS to e.................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................................................................................ 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) . 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber ....... .~~??.. .. .... . .. . Page 230 On 6/9/51 ...................... ........................ Liber ....... A~9{>............ Page..... .~?............. On 7/28/56 ........................ Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ......................., Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ........................ Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ........................ as devised under the Last \ViII and Testament of ....................................... or as distributee ....................,.................................................... ............................................................................................... 5. The area of the land is ... .~,7.~~........ aeres. 6. All taxes whieh are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except ............ NONE ............................................................................................... 7. The land is encumbered by . N.QI!I?. ... .. .' . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . " .. .. .. . . . .. .. . ... . . . .. . mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Pagoe .................. in original amount of $. .. . . . . . .. . ... unpaid amount $ ..... . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . .. held by ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. address .................. ............................................... (b) r..rortgag-c recorded in Liber ......... Pug-c ....................... in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. held by ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. address ................. .............................................. AUG 15 . " . . (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $....... :::... .. .. . .... held by ...................... . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. ... address ................................ " .. . . .. .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . 8. There are no other encumbrances or Hens against the land except ........................ NONE , ........................................................................................ 9. The land lies in the following :zoning use districts ........................................ ..1!-7AQ.................................. ............................................... 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex.. cept ........ I>.e.<: . ;1~Mc;~!,.q . '??:r.v:~~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is . ~.Z:~"~P.~r:~. )'I~~,,:r. .~~'?~:r.~C:;~. ~~!,.I.~~!~.~). .. . . . . . . . .... . . ... ' 13. Water mains wiII be laid by " .I.lP.t. x'?!I1..rl,J;I'P..-: .q.).:r.e.qc;ly. .:1,11. ;1:r.e.q.. q:!c.J;~n!'.~).. . . . .. ' and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by (EXISTING) .~':'~. .Z:~'.I?i.z:~~.:-. .'!~:r~.~~~.~!l. .'~:r~!': .... lines. ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said 15. Gas mains will be installed by . . .l.'~!'.<\. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat arc claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show samc. 17. If streets shown on the plat arc claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule i'e" hereto to show same. 18. Thcre arc no cxistinR buildinRs or 5tructures on the land which arc not located nnd shown on the plat. None 19. \Vhcrc the plat shows proposed strcets \\' hich arc extensions of streets on adjoininR sub. division maps heretofore filed. there are 110 reserve strips at the end of the streets on said s:xisting- ll1;J.ps ;J.t their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the cOllrse of these proceedillgs, the applicallt will oiicr proof of title as reqllired by Sec. .135 of thc Real Property Law. 21. Submit ;J. cop}' of proposed deed for lots ~ho\\"i:lg- all r{'strictions, co\'cnants, etc. Annex Schedule "0". '.,1 ..... t' . . 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $. . . .,.P.-: . " as itemized in Scbedule "E" hereto annexed and requests tbat the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at . . :-P::. .... . '.': years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule <IF". DATE ..~\'!l~'!~...................... 19.~~. B ( ~y P.O. BOx 1466, Southold, NY 11971 ................................................ (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF..... .... ...$V.F.F:Q~\<............, ss: , <f1/ On the.......l tJ......... day of..... .~':'!l~.'~:................, 19.. ?1... before me personally came . .~':'~?l.p.q.. !I... .ll~!,.e.t:.... .. .. .. .... .. .... . '. to me known to be the individual described in and who ,mw"d <h, '""00'" ',"mmm' "d ",'OOW'" ~"'L 1 u u u:W':d~:,~ u u Notary pu~ DONNA M, CIflTUK NOTARY PUllLlC, $tate of New York . No, 4351459, Suffolk Coun11 Term Expires August 18, lii:92/ ST:\ TE OF NE\V YORK. COUNTY OF ..... .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... S5: On the ................ day .......,..,. of .....,......... 19....... before me personally came . .. ..................... to me known. who being by me duly Sworn did de~ pose and sa)" that. . . .. . . .. ... resides at No. .................................................... , , , , , , , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . ,that ...............,....,..... is the .....,.... of ........,.........,.....,."........................................,...., the corporation descrihed in and which executed the foreg-oing' instrument; that............ know~ the s("a~ of said curporation; that the scal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporgtioil. and that ............ sig-ncd .............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public ...................................... Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer- to any of the following questions is ~, please indicate these on your guaranteed surveyor submit other appropriate evidence. 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? ~ (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) SEE SURVEY ATTACHED 2. Are there any other premises under your ownersh~ abutting this parcel? , . (~ SEE DEEDS ATTACHED -SC-I-IE'1>UL-G \,' 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes ,'t ..',' l . . Southold. No Y 0 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other ~ department or agency? (Town , State, County, etc.) Yes Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Department of Envir ental 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? Yes 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? Yes 7. Does this property have a valid certificate of occupancy, if yes please submit.a copy of same Yes No No G> No of Conservation @ G> C0 statements are true and will be relied in considerOng this application. agent AtlG I ~ticr ( . ' ~"'" . . Attachment to questionnaire fOL-the Planning Board ,- STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: fi- On the Jc.f day of August , 19~1, before me personally , came Rudolph H. Bruer to me known to be the individual described in-and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. ~'''L-~' (~-UG No y Public DONNA M. CIlITUK NOTMY PUlLIC, IlItl of New YorII N@' 41fi!4it, lulfolk Co~~l1<h_ lmm ypift! Auplt 18, ......- . ,5 W'I SCHEDU1,.E~: ~ . . : ,-, ~ \, ,.f..t.;I~'" ..,~.""J ,';i,;l i' .,;i ,-~,..., IJl,nte,ln<.hvl - I I -I I. i I i .JULIUlJ llAuElta. IH~.. ~~Y/~L~NK't.fu..l;.,(I.';'; 7' ~AY AND 1 RI!:CTOA: ST" NEW YORK .'. . '-, ,I. .. ~..J .){ tltbt~ 3Jnbenture, r'r.( day 01 June, nineteen hundred Made the and filty -one, ;" r ;,/ I, ... I .etwttn L. BAldWN HILL and ADELAIDB H. 'HILL, his wife, resid1ng 1n the Tonn of SouthOld, County or Suffollc and State of New York, at Southold, ". part ies of the first part, and PHILIP F. BETZ and BTHBL H. BBTZ, his wife, both residing at 225 Sterling Flace,Brooklyn, Kings County, New York, as tenants by the entirety, part ies 01 the second part, _itnt~~etlJ, that the part iea 01 the first part, in consideration 01 ---------------------------TEN (tlO.)-------.----------___________~__________ Dolnrs, I I , lawlul money 01 the United States, and other good and valuable consideration, paid by the parties of the second part do hereby grant amI release unto the part ies 01 the second part, their heirs and assigns lorever, au that certain piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being at Southold, in the Town of southold, county of Suffolk end State of New York, DDre particularly bounded and: described as follows:- BEGINNING at a concrete monument set in the northeasterly Une of a right of' vfiy 16.5 feet wide at the southeasterly corner of the premises herein described, said point of beginning being f'1xed as follows: CUWSNCLNG at the intersectlon of the northeasterly line of said right of ~y with the southerly extranity 0(' Youngs Avenue at a point distant 40 feet northeasterly measured along the southerly extremity of said Avenue from a DDi'lument at the southwesterly ex- I trem1ty of sald Avenue; running thence along the northeasterly line of said right of vfiy the following seven courses and distances: (1) South 40 degrees Bast 96 feet, (2) South I 56 degrees Bast 266 feet, (3) South 16 degrees 11 m1nutes 20 seconds Bast 172.10 feet, I (4) South 74 degreee lil minutes eo secQlds Bast 500 feet, (5) South 69 degrees 1 minute 20 ssconds !last 161.4U feet;, (6) South 63 degrees 27 minutes 10 ssconds Bast 178.23 feet and (7) South 47 degrees 08 minutes 10 seconds Bast 96.47 feet to the pOlnt or plnce of beg1nn1ng: and from said point of beginning thence running North 47 degress 08 mlnutes , 10 see.onds Wes1: alon'; the northeasterly Une of sald right of way 96.47 feet: thence con- I tinuing along said nor theasterly Une of said right of VIJ.Y North 53 degrees 27 minutes 110 ,,"Goncl. We..t 211.01 1'.et to II oonOtoete monumentl thonoe l'UnnlllO: ..lon& other llllld "t' I.. Bo.l'ron lillI, North 31 '.\e~reell 03 mlnutes 40 Eleconds Bast 190 feet to e. pOlnt 1n the OI'd- , I inar'~ high water 11no of Town Oreekl thana" r'unnlng llouthe".ter'ly ...long the ordlne.I'y I h1gh v.e.tel' line of 1'o.ln Creek lfO feet, more or 1esEl, to a point which h intel'sected by ! 8. ill~ Utili lm.vi/1il; !l bc;wltlll Iilr liIouth blcleC&I'Clell lS& mlhul:lIl btl IllitlCll1dllllullil 1"0,1.11 tut: I from the tel'minl.ls or 1;he last mentioned coursejthence running alCl:1!\ other land of L. ., I Barron lIill, South 33 ciB/>rees 36 minutes 10 seconds l'lest 196 feet to the conrete DDnLl- 'I hHIl1t lI.t in tile 110I'LI1\!fH.t,rly Un, or 1lI1d 1'1lthil .r Wlllf at uh. tlOh,U gr Ill.... Ill' I.lI. ginning. I , '~'Q(ji.l1'11r.:ll Vitti., FlJ] ,'i!\llt, ~Hh l\nd lntllT'~t\t; 01' tilfl Plll'tlllo Or tl19 nl'll~ IlIlPg In lj!ill 1'1 .~ '4'QOli'rIll>j( w1th I,l J'jt;;ht or t 1n, over, al:::"~:b~pon '''1~1iht or way 113.D raet i . j wIde from ehs 60uc,.eusterly corner of the premises hers1nabove deICll'lb,c1. to th, I.\i~'r~ ' .lIlt or tOUIl(;;B AV"I"le. I I i I ii lliljiliRVUN, I",,,"v",', k. .1-\.. p...H.." "I' aile rl.f'U plr', 'lllll' dlI1l1'1Dllt... llIld ....lgnl the l'lght Ull<l !JI'l v U '-'be to IlliKe t'easonable changes end a1 terations 1n the course end 10cat10n of Bald 1'1f,ht of waV Gnr enol \lplln G~her ~Im" or .~ct 'I.ru.. ".. Ill" tint pllrt it bOll1t; IIlldtJrutoud ,:llll ogl'ood, hOWllVlll', thllt the fll1%'tll'l8 or the tint put shall not be re"jlonslL>lu 1\'" 1;1", 'HI.l1ntllllOllQe ..nd Uj>kClOP or eel" l'lent Gr Wl\y beyond tho oxttllt tOll.1; IIlu l'l[ht Ol' \illy ';['iI ttll \l[lOn property lying batween !lll1d !'le:hl: 01' v.e.y e.rtd the waters of the bay or cl'eek ~ihlch they cont1nue to own, each Owner of property .abutting therefrom inoluding tlle ~1'llmeOs her'e1n to be chargeable w1th me.1nta1n1ng a Bu1table, sare and har surface for the 0l'd1nary purposes of travel In the bed thereof insofar as the seme l1es In front of hls 01' ti,e1r pl'Oporty. EXCEPTING AND J\&>~RVrH(i to the part1es of the first part, their dlstributees,asslgns, 'llom1nees or l1censees, the r1ght and prlv1lege to enter upon the property herein des- cribed and lay, constl'uct, erect and ma1nta1n thereIn or thereon sewer pipes, water or gas ~1nB, telephonlO or electr1c l1ght poles, wires or conduits, with all ordinary appurtenancos and fHtlngsj provided, however, that sewars, pipes, ma1ns, poles or con- duits shall be laili, constructed or erected only within five (6) feet of the rIght of way l1ne of the salci pl'operty 1n each instance. i Al,D thls Conveyonce 1s made subject to the following covenants, restrictIons, agreements llnd reservations;_ 1. '!hat se!d pranises shall be used exclUSIvely for residentIal purposes only. 2. '!ha t the Constl\IC tlons and erectIon of bull dIngs on the premIses Ie 111111 ted to one 10ne.femlly resldenco only of conventIonal type to cost not l~ss than #4",oo~.j one private I garage wI th servants quarters constructed or erected In ConnectIon with the garege, one boat-hwse and one bath-house. . I 3. No bullding 01' any klnd or attachment thereto hedge or fence shall be constructed or el'ected on the premlses wIthin tlYllnty feet of the top of the slope of' the beach bank, lexcept that one boat house and one bath house may be constructed on the beach eIther of 'I which shall not exceed twelve (12) feet In heIght above mean high water mark. 4. All sewage ar1 sing from the use and occupancy Of the premises ShaH be d1spOBed of "Ill cesspools or 1n septlc tanks end no outside t01lets shall be erected or 1l81ntained. 6. No sev.age or I"eiuse of any kInd shall be permitted to elllpty Into the adjacent waterc and the grantees her'd" Hgr'ee to keep "'aid v,e.tcr.. end the ltllld bOl'del'lng on se!d v.e.ters jlri front ot' the above deE;crlbed premIses free and safe therefrom and free from other debrl i 6. No horses, cows, cattle, goats, hogs, poultry or ducks shall be kept or ra1sed on lsald premlses nol' Shb] I any use be made of sald premises, whiCh 1s offens1ve, unsightly, lunhealthy 01' tendlnw to dumage 1n any manner the adJolning proper-ty or to disturb the peace 01' the 1nhubltancs of' the naighborhood. I , i I A'll or any ot' Ch0 above covenants and restrIctions lIIfl3' be modified, altered or lannulled as to the pre"llses described here1n or as to any other ne1ghboring property now ,or formerly olmed by 1:he pal'tlea of the flrst part at any time by written agreement by and betv.een the gl'€,ntOl's, thelr dlstr1butees or aSSigns, end then olllier for the time be1ng of !the premlses upon wh1ch lt is agreed to amend, alter or annul such covenants and restrlct- i10ns !ind such ugreement shall be effectual to mOd1fy, altar or annul such restrictione as ito se! d premlses w1tIJout the consent of the owner or owners of any adjacent prem1ses or eny other nelghborlng pl'emlses, now or formerly owned by the parties of the first part, 01'1 10f any other pal'ty or- mortg,1l.gee holding any interest In the sa1d premIses. I i I I The foregolng covenants and restr1ctions shall be deemed real covenants running lI1 th I ~he land and be blndinl~ upon the successors, assigns, dlstributees, legal representatives, I "xecutors, or admlnlscra tors Of the respective part1es hereto unt1l the first day of . I ~enuery, 1980, when they shall cease and terminate. I I , PermissIon is hOl'8by granted by the parties of the first PBl't to ut1l1ze a portIon I ' . iof any reSiden"e cOnstl'Ucted on se!d prem1ses for the pract1ce of dentistry, prov1ded, ! IholVever, thl:it nOl;hlng hereln conte.1ned shall be construlICI as altering or modifying in any way tile pl'ovislons of' sald restrIctions l1mi ting the construction and eree-UOn of I bUildings to those decO}l'ibed In peragraph "2". of said restrictIons. t!J:ogetber with tho "ppllItenances and all the estate and rights of the part 1es of the first part in and to said premises, t!J:o babe l1ub to I)Olll the premises herein granted unto the part les of the second part, their he1rs and assigns forever. ,~ i ~ \ . .;.IIJLk.l~r.:ij 1:4[jE(~J/' '; lRnlJ. the said part iea of the first part covenant jfirst. -That the part iee 01 the first part 81'e as follows: seized 01 the said premises in fee simple, and Ila VB load right to convey the same, j;,ttonb. -That the parties 01 the second part shall quietly enjoy the said premises; ~birb. -That the said premises are Iree Irom incumbrances; jfourtb.-That the parties 01 the first part will execute or procure any further necessary assur. ance of the title to said premises; ". jfiftb. -That the part iesol the first part willloreve; warrant the title to said premises. 6ixtb. -That the grantor, in compliance with Section 13 01 the Lien Law, covenants that the grantor wilJ receive the consideration lor this conveyance and will hoJd the right to receive such consid. eration as a trust lund to be applied first lor the purpose 01 paying the cost 01 the improvement and that tbe grantor will appJy the same first to the payment 01 the cost 01 the improvement belore using any part of the totaJ of the same for 'lllY other purpose. In-Uttnt5'5' WlM~ereof, the part ies 01 thc lirst part ha ve hereunto ~et theil' bands and seaJ e the day and year first above written. In presence of: ~.;-- ~=.~..... ...... .................... .........~............ .:.LL. S. ....Cltld..(U,.~.....l.L...7~...........L. S. ........................................................................................L. S. ........................................... ........... .................... ..............L. S. iMate of t:ountp of NEW YORK, SUFFliLK. 'Ie.: f SS.: On tbe day 0/ June, nJnotODn hundr.d and IiltY-one. before me came L .BARj~UiJ H.!Jk. and ADllLAIDllll.......J.i.!!.b. hie wifa. to me known and known to me to be tbe individuaJs descdbed in, and who cxecl/tcd, the foregoing in- strument, Ind ackuowlcdg<'<i to llIC tlJ~t they exeel/ted the same. . . RECORDED ",,~b:.'~. A,yJ/~ fUN I'J '<.lB.l f'\ 'cl'~ (),p ,IJk" r,',J.J, \, . M . t1. I"tll1lj tIUtilII<<' 01.11'11< OF (,iF' 'II 1< CQUN'T\' IU'Irll'=^ ". ',1^LVI'I"t'!1 NII'n ~\,III'i ''''', " 1/,. y',k , "fltcrnr'f.~~t~'::.:,:.(' ;.,. n:" IIr '~.jl,'d' '~r" ,"':'" ; , 1:;1 6tatt of COli lit!.' of f ",1 On the belore me came day 01 -.----~,..,''''ii'"'''"'- "inot.,n Jwnrlr"d end nlty In tit" 1r''''WII nt." 1ft,,,,,,,,, ,.. mil ," 14,. ",,, ''',II~/'''',., f/"~_"'''"" (Ul '''HI W/llt PJtIJ..,u,,,,I, flu' '.'''..1''. ,,.. strument. and acklJowleclged to me that he e.yecutec/ the same. sa.lalt of ((olllllp of f 55.: On the day of before me came witness to the foregoing instrument, with whom sworn. did depose and say that' he resides in nineteen hundred and lifty the subscribing 1 am persona//y acquainted, who, being by me' duly that he knows to be the individual described in, and who executed the foregoing instrument; that . he, said subscribing witness, was present, and saw execute the same; and that he. said witness. at the same time subscribed h name aI witne.. tbereto. - \ , '\ '" '.' -'i ~. ;.. '" . "" "" .... ;.: "" :ij /:j >< tW ~ tW ~ J~~ .> ( \ '<I f>; ~ A ~ ~ l=t ::<l & .... I ~ "" ~ , \ ( , 5 ~ ~ ~ . Il<< ~ I t1/i I ..i gl ~l .,,; .. ~ III Q . .-1 :;i .... ~~ o'l ~ ~ ~ '\~ '~~~,~ ~ 0: ";,'- " , ::. ~ ' ,', ~ ,}~ ~ ~'~~ ~ \8 ~ ~ ~~ , , " .b TJ" lS ..... '~ 0 " .<:: :tl':i .t: 0 il CI) . .><: .. ~ '" '5 0 ~ .t'~~ "tJ ~ Z ~ Q) .. "'<:: ,., tt.J.J4J III 3 "tI .S 0 " .. '-' .!! ." ~ " ..:;: rl ~ 1! e a~ <- ..... ..~ J"..._ ...._, "- ',. ,- ) .... ~ '" ~ u iii o :t .~ 'l! a u ~ 0: ... a ~ . = ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ . :a w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0: . , ;'.) .. I " - l c. :':..: , i " II, ~ r. ':J '- '- " (' ) , , , I '"' ... ., ., ~ . . . . SCHEDULE "c" Calves Neck Road is an existing public street in the Town of Southold Highway system. (Per Southold Town Clerk's Office) ';,;~"":'li";'<<""\"'" SCHED "" . . ...... . . . Made the Fifty-six 18tthJttU y/d da,y of July Nineteen Hundred and HELEN WICKHAM, residing at Cutchogue, Suffolk County, New York, part y of the first part, lUul PHILIP F. BETZ and ETHEL H. BErZ, his wife, residing Youngs Avenue, Southold, Suffolk County, New York, B.S tenants by entirety, <mittttctl~ttl! ,that the part y parties of the second part, of the first part, in consideration of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - Dollaro I, "~ Ten and 00/100 - - - - '. ~ 1 (, 10.00 ) lawful money of the ,valuable consideration , United States, and other good and paid by the parties of the second part, do es hereby grant and release unto the part y of the second part, the Bur- distributees vivoI', his or herJand assilns forever, all that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, si tuate, lying and being at Southold, in the 'rown of Southo1d, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and des- cri bed a s fa llows : BEGINNIlTG at a point marked by a concrete IIxmument set on the northeasterly line of a right of way 16.5 feet in width at the southe 1'1 corner of the premises herein described (which ooint is the wester corner of other land of the parties of the second part); running then in a northwesterly direction along the said northeasterly line of sai right of way, N. 530 27' 10" W. a distance of 125.47 feet to a point 1ll11'ked by !l conorete monumen t and land 01' Max H. Haas; running thenc in a northonnterly direotion along sald land 01' Haas, N. 240 08' ~o" a distance 01' 188 feet, more or less, to ordinary high water line of Town CrElck; running thence in a Boutheaster~y dlrGotlon along "utel IIrIU.,I..,,7' I'd"h w..bel' Uno of Town Ol"oek, II dilltanoe of 150 1'eet, morA less, to other land of the parties of the second part; r1.Uming thEme in Il Oiuu"i''''~~"lII..;I,t; "'~"II!"Ml!ltl dtHIQ ., the'socond ; (\rt; S. :310 03' 40" w. .liltl l'l,bhtUI ll\Wh\ uf h1l6 pllJ.1tl f)~ or . a distance of 190 feet, more 01" I <'-----'-''''''''' . . l~fR4164 P;;;E !J '. " '''less, to the point or place ,of beginning. 'fOGE'i'IJER wi th the rie;ht to the use, (in common Vi i th 0 there), of a right of way for ingress and egress to and from the above described premises to Youngs Avenue over the aforesaid right of way l6~ feet in width, the easterly and northeasterly lines of which are described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeasterly corner of the premises above des- cri bed and rLIDning thence the fo llowing 'seven courses and ells tances to the southerly line of Youngs Avenue, viz: (1) N. 530 27' 10" w. 149.22 feet; (2) N. 69 c 01' 20" W. 161.40 feet; (3) N. 740 21' 20" W. 500.00 feet; (5) N. 160 11' 20" W. 172.10 feet; (6) N. 550 00' W. 255.0 feet; (7 ) N. 400 00' W. 96.0 'feet to the southerly line of Youngs Avenue. TOGETHER with all the right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to the waters and land under water below highwater mark of Town Creek in front of and abutting said premises to the centerline thereof. BEING AND INTE~rnED TO BE the same premises conveyed by L. Barron Hill and Adelaide H. Hill, his wife, to Helen WiCkham, by deed dated September 30, 1955 and reoorded in Suffolk County Clerk's Offioe on Ootober 19, 1955 in Libel' 3997 of Deeds, Page 172, and SUBJECT to the reservations affeoting said right of way, and SUBJECT to the covenants, restrictions, agreements, and reservations affeoting said premises. I, 'I " .'~.' . . Q[~~lltr with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the jirst part in and to said premises, mtl 1!;t).Jt mab ht 'l..1b the premises herein granted unto the parties of the second part, the survivor, his or her distributees and assigns forever. ~1~ the party of the first part covenant that s he has not done or suffered anything whereby the said prem'i8es have been incumbered in any way whatever. ~1'.b That, in Compliance with Sec. 13 of the Lien Law. the ~rantor will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the ritht to receive such consideration as (/ t ru.st fund to be applied first for the purpose of pallin~ the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cosl of the improvemen t lie/ore usinl! any part of the total of the same for any other purpose, ~tt ~ibl(~~ ~t"..c, the part;{ of the first part ha s hereunto set her hand . l/nflrt.\len(t of and seal the day and year first above written, _'/;/~4A/ /(J;'~u elen Wickham ~~~' wtl" ",.1:., ~ "~', . .. itntt llf~t\\v !cf'8~ I urlll1l1t~ 11r BIIF I'TJlJK \ ...... ,t" ~?t day of j4 On this Fifty-nix I , ll8fli' 4164 f".~". I . 'fi: ,I If I i I I I I I I , I ,before me, the subscriber, personally appeared Nineteen Hundred and .. HELEN WICKHAM to me personally known and known to me to be the slune person described in and wlw e;l!ecuted the within Instru.ment, and she duly acknowledged to me th.at B he executed the are. / ~/~~~~ William Wickham Note5y Public, state of New York No. 2-4259000-- Qualified in Suffolk County Te~ Expires March 30, 1957 .. 0 .p ~ ~j " . ~: ~ ::r.: Cl .p 0 :>1 III H ~l rr'''d''"''" , rC' al '1 '0 .O~ ~ P-<rr: al .. RECORDED Os:lS '0 H..-t H ffi~O 0 @ ~ (J AUG 2 () 195& III H ~ 0 ~t),I$(lM. 01 '-' <1 1'. WI LLJAM H. FRY al ClllII IIlWk C..., <D rl P-< ; , '" 1."1 1-" :;.(:.:: ..,., tt~ -. d.. :'.;.... ,.1\ .~ _. .::) ~ rl - C'l )OC.:: .' C::) La: :..:: r-- --:{\J.J -.I ., , I , _JC, 'i C'."'::~ ..... (.,) II. , '"-' J i.1.. " '-" -- .. - = ..- ", =: ~. -.0 '1.1\ ~ ~ I:t! l:'l . ~ ~, ~~ P=lG) .~ U Q JX.;' ~j H ;;: Ell S ~'E Jal t..:las ~ H :r: P-< I . () ~ \ \. .. co C\l I>> ..-l oS -' ..... <:< ::ll - .~ '1:',.: .~> , . --- ~ - ::'>- I ~j - . III I,$'t ['" 't ... ;j ~ ~ ~ '-.; CrJ .:::: ,~- 1"\ ' iii '" . :'\ ':: :t" '1 ~ ~ '""z i. ~ ~ '1; ~ ~ o ~" '\ Q.~ I. 1.1 .'- ..... :\ o I" n: I o U w 0::: ~. . . i ~I ~ '~ 3:J ~ t" ~~;;:!\J~ '- . '" " '" ....' ,....~ . ;""~;~"';'~;'~? --1-:-1~~0~":-'"':~"~:~'" . . o . . oJ 1li 51 /. '. / ,tr Ii Jl~ h : :=. 1\' ~ · 5l ;s II ~ <I( -= ~ 'u. ()". ,~ .... ~. iJ: u ~ qiHH !i:;'E.d -'1)-% V) tJ'): ~ 101- ... J( . o o.e-~ >t-~o t->OJ Z iV ~ ::>Q..~ o 0 .. Uct: ."" ~",.",." , ". :v 'J. ...... -'" . <"'.::<:,,,,v. "'h,,_:..'~ "\ . .i,...,;;,::.,J, . . ..' :1 i f a ~ i 5 :i 1 I': . I w ~ . ~ 'I ~ . . . , I> ,~ iltr , I i ~ II s. 3~~ H 4 1 J BIB '. i Vw. . , 1 J@ R & II I I 4 J I j lLd HIH I 1'1'; 1 i 1 U ~ il 'I !!! I i a I ... w ftil: -: J J J J! "' II .... ! iil." ."' "'1"'1"'11 i ~ : --i"; .. I . 511 ~ 11.',1 !n~l . \; iI= 1\lli I '11' J - i J d! i lun I I' 1\ .. ~ ~ :! . " - a. AUT H 0 R I Z A T ION RE: Subdivision for ETHEL H. BETZ Calves Neck Road, Southold, N.Y. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I, ETHEL H. BETZ, am the owner of certain real property at Southold, New York, deSignated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as: District 1000, Section 063.00, Block 07.00, Lots 034.000 & 035.000. I, hereby authorize my attorney, RUdolph H. Bruer, and/or his legal assistant, Mary Diana Foster, to proceed on my behalf with any and all applications to the Town of Southold, the Suffolk County Health Department and the N.Y.S. Dept. of EnVironmental Cpnservation for the purpose of obtaining the necessary approvals for a subdivision of the subject premises. , Dated: '1 /1'1/91 ~d'~CS ' P.O.A t)\ Ethel H. Betz "' ( / <;' ~ Form No, 49 .. ''';.f .' ,:SU..{:)F/ [,0' <./" FiLeD fl.1/11,;) FiLL PHONE, 852-2000 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE Edward P. Romai n';;., COUN'l'Y CLERK .'tIVl'!nflEJ/lI..., ril!:.W ....onK t, 90 I rown of Southold Assessor vlTown of Southold Planning Board Chief Deputy County'Treasurer To Whom This May Concern: The Subdivision Map Of: Was Filed, Filed Number, AI,stract Number, Township, Southold Owner: Map Department Z70 ~ 03-7- 1 J- 2-fj 1)....033 y~ Very truly yours, County Clerk (p /;o/r~ j'-f'l-jj- lID) ~ @ ~ 0 W ~ ~ I1JJ '. . J , 0 1992 IE) SOUTHOUl TOWN PlANNING BOARD 12-157:,1.. ,. SOUTHOLD PLANNING BO. 2 APRIL .1992 ( Mr. Orlowski: 7:30 p.m. Ethel Betz - This minor subdivision is for two lots on 1.281 acres located on calves Neck Road in Southold. SCTM 11000-63-7-34 & 35. We have proof of publication in both the local papers and everything is in order for a final hearing. I'll ask if there are any objections of this subdivision? Hearing none, I'll ask if there are any recommendations of this subdivision? Mr. Rudolph Bruer: Mr. Chairman and Members of the Board. On behalf of Mrs. Betz, I believe the arguments have been stated in favor of the application in previous hearings and I would just like to repeat them as if they were stated here again and ask that the Board please grant the application. Thank you very much. Mr. Orlowski: O.K., any other endorsements of this subdivision? Hearing none, is there anyone out there neither pro nor con but may have information pertaining to this subdivision that would be of interest to the Board? Hearing none, any questions from the Board? Board: No questions. Mr. Orlowski: Being there are no further questions, I'll entertain a motion to close this hearing. ~ Mr. Latham: So moved. Mr. Ward: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. Does the Board have any pleasure? Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, I would like to offer the following resolution. WHEREAS, Ethel H. Betz, is the owner of the property known and designated as SCTM 11000-63-7-34 & 35, located at Calves Neck Road in Southold; and WHEREAS, this minor subdivision, to be known as Minor Subdivision for Ethel H. Betz, is for two lots on 1.281 acres; and <.. WHEREAS, a variance was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on March 5, 1992; and ( ( L .~SOUTHOLD PLANNING BO~ 3 APRIL 7"992 WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on November 18, 1992; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on April 7, 1991; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and be it therefore, RESOLVED, that the Southo1d Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final survey dated September 4, 1991. Mr. McDonald: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made to approve and sign the surveys. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. (Chairman endorsed maps). **************************************** Hearings Held OVer From Previous Meetings: Mr. Orlowski: Angel Shores - This proposed subdivision is for forty-nine lots on 92.74 acres off Main Bayview in Southold. SCTM #1000-88-6-1, 4 & 5. It was held over because we had not received the Suffolk County Planning Commissions Report. It has come in today, but we have not yet had time to review it. I'll ask if anyone out there has any comments on this hearing while it is still open? Mr. William Moore: For the applicant. I just got a copy of that resolution this evening also. We do have a problem with one condition imposed. Condition number #8 prohibiting direct access to the water, to the owners of lots #42, #43 and #44. On behalf of the applicant, I think that is a very objectional condition. I don't know that docks or other structures may be a problem, I don't know the water depth there off hand, or if the docks are even feasible or likely to be requested by a property owner. Anyway, the Planning Commission should be imposing conditions on the dock. Certainly, prohibiting complete access to the water for the project is objectional. The only other -:.,; LEGAL NO'J'lCE Noll.. of ....k a_Ia. ~__ __.........~ ulat punuant to Section 1:16 of the Town Law, a public bearing will be bold by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Han. Main Road, Southold, New York. in said Town on the 6th day of April 1992 on the quealion of the followinB: 7:30 P.M. Final approval for the lubdiviJion for Philip P. Bcu and Blhel H. Bctz at Southold, in the Town of Soutbold, County of Suffolk and the State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number. 1~3-7- 34 It 35. The property i. bordered on the northeast by Town Creek: on the southeast by land now or formerly of Van Bourgondien; 011. the southwelt by Calve. Neck Road; on the north- west by land now or formerly of Jerk- nCI. Any penon deairing to be beard on the above ma1l.er shoold appear at the time and place specified. DaIod: March 18, 1992 BYauEllFnm SOUlIKlU)_ I'L/IJI_Jl"'" _ <ldoslUi, Jr. ~an ~- . . . I STATE OF NEW YORK) · )55: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ()IJ(I$t COY\J IU-I tJ of Mattltuck, In said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she Is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES; a Weekly Newspaper, published at Mattltuck, In the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Nolice of which the annexed Is a printed copy, has been regularly published In said Newspaper once each week for I weeks successively, commencing on the 2~ day of Principal Clerk 19...1k--Il11IlRfA F, JAKLEVIC rk "6\trv l'u.bllt, SIIlte of New Yo '~ NO. 4902138 Qualified if1 !?uftotk"'~ ? Commission Expires 7/W19.L."..; / " LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NaflCE IS HEREBY GIV- EN that pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law, a public hear- ing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold. New York in said Town on the 6th day of April 1992, on the question of the following: 7:30 P.M. Final approval for the subdivision for Philip P. Betz and Ethel H. Betz at Southold, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and the State of New York. Suf- folk County lax Map Number. 1000-63-7-34 & 35. The property is bordered on the northeast by Town Creek; on the southeast by land now or formerly of Van Bourgondien; on the southwest by Calves Neck Road; on the northwest by land now or formerly of Jerknes. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the time and place above specified. Dated: March 18, 1992 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD lOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman IX-3126/92(1) . COUNTY 01' SUrl'OLK STkll' 01' NEW YOI\K . ss: P,trici, Wood,' being cluly sworn, s,ys that she is the Eclitor, or TI-IE I_ONG ISLAND TRAVELER.WATCHMAN , a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; .lnd that the notice of which the ilnncxcd is a printed copy, ILlS Ill:!..'!) ,published III s;\icl Long ISI.111() TJ';\vl.'ln.W;\(cllm;lll once l.'ilch week for I weeks 1Dl~@~nL lUU MAR 3 0 1992 ---;~..-:-:.: O;_'~' 'THOt,)_'1 , \\.\\HC ,~. /7 f~"-/'n.--- (' r _" ~/( L."L.- <40.-,".:'__ .,......,......,.,.,...., . Notary Public 8^RB,~RA A, SCHNEIDER NOTI\nY PUBLIC, SI~le 01 New York No, ~GOGS46 QUJlilierl in Sullolk C~~nty!- Commission Expires 'i'JI (1..'(. . . SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: ;r~ 2. ~ SUBJECT: SCTM# : COMMENTS: ~L 2).000. ~.Fi(.,e ft/ uV.~/c. ~ ~ ~ 0"- fJ f-'-<- 3- ,.Le, IY BUill ." SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM# : COMMENTS: . . SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER ~~ i~~- .3 J.-' G)-7-3{.-r 3 ~. ill m I!l m U 'II m ,fr)1! MAR 2 5 1992 ----J SOUTHOl J reWi; PLANNING BOilRO ~A~ ~ i I .-1 I . \ . Sub. R~ cf'~ ~ /J8~ ATTORNEYS AT LAW MAIN ROAD - P.O. BOX 1466 SOUTHOLD, NEWVORK 11971 I,..EF',.ERTS P. EDSON (1912-19.9) RUDOLPH H. BRUER (51 &) 765-' 222 (516) 765.2500 ,....X: (516) 765-2752 March 13, 1992 Southold Town planning Board Town Hall Main Road southold, New York 11971 Re: Betz, Ethel H. SCTM#lOOO-63-07-34 & 35 Dear Sirs: In connection with the above matter, enclosed herewith please find three mylars and three prints executed by the Suffolk County Health Department. If you should need anything further, please do not hesitate to contact me. ~ \l ~ \l U W ~ fn\\ n It Ii \ MAR 11 \992 !~ . SQlllllOlD lOWN ~" f(M!NING BOARD . ( . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765- [938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box I 179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 March 17, 1992 Rudolf H. Bruer Edson and Bruer Main Road P.O. Box 1466 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision for Ethel H. Betz SCTM# 1000-63-7-34 & 35 Dear Mr. Bruer: The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 16, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional sketch approval on the map dated September 4, 1991. Sketch approval is conditional upon submission of final maps containing the provision of the Zoning Board of Appeals decision of March 5, 1992. The maps, which must contain a valid stamp of Health Department approval, must be submitted within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless a extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted/by the Planning Board. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, April 6, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. for a final public hearing on the maps dated September 4, 1992, subject to receipt of revised maps containing Suffolk County Health Department approval by such date. Please note that any final approval will be conditioned upon payment of the two thousand dollar ($2000) park and playground fee as per Section A 1Q6-38 E (3) of The Town Code. . . Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, B~f!w~71:>J.~s Chairman _.~ --. .. . . ~i .......vO . KK ii~' \ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, J r. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1809 ~ ~ ~- }~ SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor \ ._~~ '-, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 ~ rn~ ~ 1" ~ I ! [ BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Appl. No. 4047. ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLO TOWN PLANNING BOARO Upon Application of ETHEL H. BETZ. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IIIA.3, 100-31A.3, Bulk Schedule, for approval of insufficient lot area and width of two parcels, as conveyed by deeds in 1951 and in 1956. Location of Property: Northeast side of Calves Neck Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel Nos. 1000-63-7-34 and 35. WHEREAS, public hearings were held on December 16, 1991 and January 23, 1992, at which time all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the fOllowing Findings of Fact: 1. This is an application concerning a total lot area of 55,789 sq. ft. situated in the R-40 Residence District and located along the northeasterly side of Calves Neck Road, Hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, and more particularly identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 63, Block 7, Lots 34 and 35. 2. The most southerly half of the subject premises is improved with a one-story, single-family dwelling which is situated. approximately 48 feet from the front property line along Calves Neck Road, approximately 6.7 feet from the proposed division line to the west, and 24.9 feet to the easterly (side) property line. 3. By this variance application, appellant is requesting permission to reestablish separate parcels as shown on the County Tax Maps of Suffolk County, referred to as Lot *34 and Lot *35, and more particularly described in the deeds of conveyance to the applicant dated June 9, 1951 and July 28, 1956 and further noted as follows: 1?age 2 - Appl. 1 . 4047 Matter of ETHEL BETZ Decision Rendered March 5, 1992 (a) proposed westerly half, shown as Lot #34 on the County Maps, contains a proposed total lot area of 26,097 sq. ft. with 125.47 ft. frontage along Calves Neck Road; (b) proposed easterly half, shown as Lot #35 on the County ~aps, contains a proposed total lot area of 29,692 sq. f~. with)25.47 ft. frontage along Calves Neck Road. 4. Column iii of the Bulk Schedule, and Article IlIA, Section 100-31A.3 of the zoning code regulations (as amended January 10, 1989) requires a minimum lot area of 40,000 square feet per lot and minimum width of 150 feet. 5. The percentages of relief sought by this application are as follows: (a) proposed westerly lot {referred to as Lot #34} is 66% of the total lot area requirement of 40,000 sq. ft.; (b) proposed easterly lot {referred to as Lot #35} is 75% of the total lot area requirement of 40,000 sq. ft.; 6. In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: (a) the relief as granted is not substantial in relation to lots existing in this vicinity; (b) the practical difficulties claimed and dollars-and cents-proof are sufficient, as submitted in the record, to warrant a grant of this variance; (c) there will be no substantial change in the character of the neighborhood and a precedent would not be set for the following reasons: {1} immediately to the west and east are parcels of similar character and size comparable to this application; there have been no other mergers found in this vicinity, except that a parcel five lots to the west (1000-63-7-29.1) consisti of an area of 40,000 sq. ft. as combined and the character of this lot is not comparable when viewing the size, shape, contours, building setback requirements, etc. All other parcels in this area have been recognized as individual, separate parcels for at least 25 years, most of which have been improved with single-family dwellings. The circumstances under this application, and this approval, will not have a direct effect or set a precedent to any other lots in this neighborhood. {2} the parcels immediately south of Calves Neck Road in the vicinity of applicant's land do consist of a total lot areas from apprcximately 29,000 sq. ft. to 39,000 sq. ft. +- --,.-",,---"-'-~--""""'-- ~~ - ~--pa~e 3 - Appl. No. 404. Matter of ETHEL BETZ Decision Rendered March 5, 1992 . as shown by the county tax maps, as deeded for each parcel {these parcels are not dividable into substandard lots in this R-40 zone district under the circumstances under which they exist and have existed since prior to the enactment of one-acre zoning in November 1971, and prior thereto, based upon our review of the town and county records}; {3} the lots which exist in the immediate vicinity are lots which appear to have been single and separate since the 1960's and have not existed by creation of a zoning variance - the subject application is uniquely related to the land and is not personal in nature. (d) method feasible variance; the difficulties cannot be obviated by some for the appellant to pursue, other than a (e) that the grant of this variance will not created a substantial change in the area or substantial density increases, particularly since the practical difficulties are not shared by the surrounding area parcels; (f) that the applicant has received approvals from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services under Article 6 - Realty Development and Subdivision RegUlations; (g) that in view of the manner in which the difficulties arose, and in considering all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the variance, as conditionally noted below. (h) that it is the board's belief from personally viewing the land and buildings and from statements in the record that it was the appellant's intention not to abandon the separability of the lots, and that the lots were intended to be conveyed as a separate building parcel at some future date _ exactly as conveyed by deeds at Liber 3226 cp 230 dated 6/9/51 from L. Barron Hill and Adelaide H. Hill and at Liber 4164 cp 49 dated 7/28/56 from Helen Wickham to the current owner. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief as requested under Appeal No.4047 in the Matter of ETHEL BETZ, with the PROVISION THAT THE VACANT PARCEL IS SUBJECT TO THE BULK SCHEDULE REGULATIONS FOR THE R-40 ZONE DISTRICT concerning side yards at 15 and 20 feet, front yard at 40 feet, setback from wetlands at 75 feet, lot coverage at 20% limitation, etc. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. GOEhringer, Doyen, Page 4 - Appl. . . 4047 Matter of ETHEL BETZ Decision Rendered March 5, 1992 Grigonis and Dinizio. Nay: Member Villa (opposed in all respects). This resolution was duly adopted by a 4-1 margin. * * * lk .-")7 / -- .,.-" -!": - _~__, ", _u :'._ L~~~?~ GERARD P. GOEHRINGE~IRMAN -,~,~~~-~,-"-,,,,-""" - .. 6 . . APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1809 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor - ~~D::::.:~J'- -.' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 12, 1992 Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. Edson & Bruer P.O. Box 1422 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Appl. No. 4047 - Matter of Ethel H. Betz Dear Mr. Bruer: Please find attached a copy of the Board's Findings and Determination rendered concerning the above application. Please be sure to return to the Planning Board and Building Department offices for issuance of other necessary approvals and/or permits. Copies of this determination have also been furnished this date to the offices of the Planning Board and Building Department for their update and permanent records. Very truly yours, Linda Kowalski Enclosure Copies of Decision to: Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Planning . G 3 - 7- 17'. ~r:( r....& P1)$j' ,,~ =I1..E NUMBER'. ""1\114 7.3800..00825"'''''Town of SOUTHOL.D, County ... .::::::::::,....... ..................................;.;..::::::::::::::::::::::::..:................................:::::':::::::::..:... ..............,. ..........:::::::::::::::::::::::::! ;;':::F:A'b::: AGENCY ~ ::!!\;~::~~:'~,7'3,qOO:n::::::::: ............. yTo~~;r;.. of SOUTHOLD ~ 3UFFOI,~K Count y ! i.::::::::::::::::;; """""':::';':::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::'.:'" ............................::::::::::::::::::::::::.,.,.. ilff - ,. ........, .,-" ,. . ..' ,..""", "" ...............-., '.,. '.,. ,." ,. ,.""""" ..., ,., ..' ".," ::.~;~;;:~;;;~;~;:~.::':jj,:;i,:~j:j::~ 1I1~_I.:"1..:,..~.......,.,~,..'~.:..,.f< ~::'. ?:~...:.~:~~~:~R?,. '-':: .::~..:.-. '~.0:~::~:.:0:~:~:: 6.. ..'."'.'.....c.c...'..,..r...: .d..":..::::::........... ............., ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.- ,. I :':"CLASS' "T "tin 1 j c.t ed"""'''' ......... ;;:;;;::;:;:::;;:;;;;;;;;;;;", 1!1]lLE~Eth~.i H.. Betz .. :.:.:::::::......................Type 1/' ..........................<, 1~~~~I~~I(';t.!!~)~7;"~~~~:s~~~ii,i~~~~~~~ 0 2 1 ote o~ 26, OQ7sF ~J?9, 692sf loci I\I!.,.,.,....... .............................",.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, . ." .... 1..2.... .,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.....,..,.....,............,......:..:'.:...,.:,..,.:,:,.:,.:,......',:..',..'..'.........'...'.....................................'.... '''DA IE RECEIVED: i.".... .... """,.,"""""':"""'''''''''''' ~ I Negat i ve De<ol~~8f~,~,t~..:11)25/~I<iI ...',..;,...,..:,..:,...",.,:,..,....,...'..i.:i';;'.'i,'i"ii""'.'.iii'."..i'.:. '....'.'...:.,..:..........:.:.:..,.:.:.i.i.i.i."..i.ii.i.:.'..'..'.'.:.". """",,,,,,,,'i' ..... . . ... ................. . iii .,.,.,,'''''''''''' ............. ........... ........ ........................ "i:.:;...:...:.i"''''.''''i'',,! IT A TU~ N ...... ...........".".".,.,...."..""""".... . ...... ...... ............ .................................. .......................................... ... ..........,.:"",,".I!f " '.' ...; ~~~~~t tj,~~~~~T ...................... ... ..........:::::::. .................. .m ..... . . ...................... ....> .; .::, ........R~~CO '''2.,~'', .].::.[.::![11!!'[1[:~~:![1!;[[~.:1:::.;;:;~:!::~::ii..i~~':;~~':;"i::~~ !Pill:::::....."..... .......................,.....,......................,,,,.. Cut'"'t'"'e n t R eco t'" d :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::'.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::, ..:::.:::::::~ i,~,~: ~~~ :~~~.~~ ~~ ~:: ........ ............ : ....:.:.. '~"~.: '.::: :.:":: :.': '.: '.:'" :.": '.:~' .'. :.: ~." :.::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: :.~:; ~",. " ... . .., .. .n".. .,...................... .... .....................~"..... ..::~ :.: :.:: :.::.::.~.: :.:. :.:.~.~ :.:.~.:.:.:~.~~.: :.::: ~::::::: :.: :.~:.~:~:~.::.:.:.::.: :.:: :~:.:.: :.:.::::: :.:.::: .:.".:.~.:.~.:~.: ~.:~.: ~.~;.: :.: ~.:' :'.:.: ~.::: :.:::: :~ _.'~' i" TMPORTANT >> File N'L1mb e r : N:L-473800-00825 t).~,!", th,,,,, :'::"0"\/'''' ~~I,.lrr~::;,:",r i~... 0",\ ') ,1 correspondence abOL!t this action! TO the L~Ad Agency: The above information confirms that filings on the described Negative DecJ.sration were officially received by. and entered in the SEQR Repository on the date(s) shown in the box heeded DATE R~CEIVED i."3!bnve The date Cine1 time in the second line show when thi':;: document was printed_ Please check the information above carefully_ For corrections or qlJestions cont8ct Charles Lockrow) (518)457-2224, or write to: w ~ ~ _\ SEQR Repository NYSDEC Division of Regulatory Af~airs 50 Wolf Road, Room 514 Albany, NY 12233 \n)m l\JJ om-!- Tc\wn of SOUTi,..10LD Planning Board 53095 Mait' Road-p.D Box 1_179 Southold. NY 21q71 , ; i I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L.. Edwards , .... j/f/JL,'_, ..'c-;. ,vr~'b\lHDl.t~~;. . 'iY~'\!JI' . ~ ~" /r' ~...:~ " ,,~ \~ (( 5 .;~'-",,' :'... ~~; ~, "" c', ~. , ','.'.':,,*, -.;;; l,.<- . ,':" ,,":"'- ~ "..-:; \ '-~ ,,'." , ',' e:::::> : "_:"-_'~'" ... ~,' -,~ A... If.~'~"" ..." ,:- .... ' ,..~"' ~,.. ~". '0-1 .'1.. ~~ -'-~'::~:''>:':;~/J (: ,:i_' J SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Rudolph H. Bruer Edson and Bruer Main Road P.O. Box 1466 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Bruer: November 22, 1991 RE: Minor Subdivision of Ethel H. Betz Calves Neck Road, Southold Zoning District: Low-Density Residential (R-40) SCTM* 1000-63-7-34 & 35 You should be aware that if the Planning Board grants final approval, the Town will require a park and playground fee of $2000.00 per vacant lot as per Town Code, section A106-38 E (3). If you have any questions or require further information, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ~;,,~ ~'d/./... Bennett Orlowski, Jr. L /"/ K2l Chairman l' ( ~~UfFOt~~, !I"I".~~'.'JI."' ~ ".' C''=> t' ~\\ ('e- - -',' iI",~_. :"N ~ ". - c, ~ ~'- .. tr'1 I' c, C' \ ,. -. ~>' ., ~ ,,'" ,j- ''0 ""'0" ....'?>"'. ", jr .~...~~ I'jJY -G-- 3',,11- ?~> -':2?carJJP- " PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L Edwards SCOTI L HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 November 19, 1991 RUdolph H. Bruer Edson and Bruer Main Road P.O. Box 1466 Southo1d, Ny 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision of Ethel H. Betz SCTM# 1000-63-7-34 & 35 Dear Mr. Bruer: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 18, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclose please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, ~tJ~Lt\)(), 'Y1/111S Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chainnan George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards ~ ~ '.' ,- 7-' ,tJ-fj.-.z..,-_.---- ~>":--,._ /\) c;,\lfFDL,r ~~, ~,,~'..! . ~ \, 1..::,;" ~t,\ \'2Q;.' :",-' "" "> ...,\ ..c:::>,a \ 1;;~ "'"" ~'fO./ ," -'., .-;"f/ , , .' SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor '~;:':'r;c/,j" Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significance November 18, 1991 This notice of issued pursuant to part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Minor subdivision for Ethel H. Betz SCTM# : 1000-63-7-34 & 35 Location: North east side of Calves Neck Road, 1208 feet southeasterly of Young's Avenue. SEQR Status Type I (X) unlisted ( ) Negative Declaration: Yes (X) No ( ) Description of Action: Subdivision of a 55,789 square foot lot into two lots of 26,097 square feet and 29,692 square feet. . - )., ,) I I Page 2 Ethel H. Betz SEQR Negative Declaration Con't. Reason Supporting This Determination: An Environmental assessment has been submitted and reviewed. It was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. No correspondence has been received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time. Therefore it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. No correspondence has been received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. This property and the surrounding area are serviced by the Greenport Village Utility Company. There are no private wells downgradient of the site. The division of land would not set a precedent because of further subdivision or substandard lots in the area as most lots are already in the size range of 25,000 to 30,000 square feet. For these reasons it is not anticipated that there will be any adverse impacts from project density or groundwater impact. For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Roger Evans, DEC Stony Brook Comm. C. Jorling, DEC Albany Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Applicant I r;.' - PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards ,_.~./;;/.i?~'-<; .~~~UfFOLk>~ 6Y.,ss II" ~ G ,y~. . ,~\\ f'g r; " . :",,1:1: ~ c; :~; I. ~H ~,<::> ~,~~ '.., \" ~lJ ....., .....'1- ',' ." ~''''O >.,', .':-.;11 (', ~. '.f ~JI i-~,(' -"-<>... ,'-~ /;:~J"':::i. _,~ SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southo1d. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November 19, 1991 RUdolph H. Bruer Edson and Bruer Main Poad, P.O. Box 1466 Southo1d, NY 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision of Ethel H. Betz SCTM#1000-63-7-34 & 35 Dear Mr. Bruer: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 18, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED to override the October 3, 1991 Suffolk County Planning commission report for the following reason: The division of land would not set a precedent of further subdivision of substandard lots in the area as most of the lots within five hundred (500) foot radius are already in the size range of 25,000 to 30,000 square feet. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, ~,~tt ()-L~~I r' Bennett Orlowski, jr. ~~ Chairman enc. cc: Suffolk County Planning Commission ( J II t " ( COUNTY OF SUFFOLK (d~.";"~. ,'&?tii' ~~. " \1f1 ". .'i., t '. ~~ 11;.:\-. ..'i ~~ PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE AHTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING October 3, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - Ethel H. Betz Northeasterly side of Calves Neck Road, 1208 + feet southeast of Youngs Avenue, Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on October 2, 1991, reviewed the.proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Ethel H. Betz" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning by I" Frank owling, Sr. Planner Subdivisio~eview Division File: S-SD-91-09 FD:mb Attachment cc: J. Baier, C.E., SCDHS ;-; I~ \1' ~ ~ q \~ .. ~I 15 'J 5 " ",i '.'. ~ I 'I' illl .:: - ~l:;\ L SOUTHOLO TOwN PlAtlNING UOAll0 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, L.I.. NEW YORK 11788 ISICi1360-5192 () '0 II( File No. S-SD-91-09 Resolution No. ZSR-91-155 of Suffolk County Planning Commission Pursuant to Sections AI4-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections AI4-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on September 17, 1991, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Ethel H. Betz" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting premises located on the northeasterly side of Calves Neck Road, 1208 + feet southeast of Youngs Avenue in the Town of Southold, and r WHEREAS, said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its meeting on October 2, 1991 and WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to disapprove said referral, Be It Therefore RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Be It Further RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is disapproved for the following reason: Creation of a subdivision with substandard lots, that is, lots whose areas are less than the minimum required by the zoning classification of the property, constitutes an overintensification of land use. Such action could establish a precedent for future subdivision of this kind which would essentially be a circumvention of the Town Board's action taken over the past years to upzone the area in order to bring it more into conformity with modern lot area and planning standards and to limit density. Motion by: Commissioner Shepard Seconded by: Commissioner Lee Commission Vote: 11 Present Yeas Nays Abstentions 10 o 1 Commissioner McDonald Dated October 2, 1991 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission >>--- ! "COUNTY OF SUFFOLK . II t ~~~ }~#.,. 0: ,.~ . <- i, ID.~ ..~~,.'Y; ,,~ PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Oc tober 3, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - Ethel H. Betz Northeasterly side of Calves Neck Road, 1208 ~ feet southeast of Youngs Avenue, Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on October 2, 1991, reviewed the. proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Ethel H. Betz" referred to it pursuant to Section AI4-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. Very truly yours, . Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning Planner Division File: S-SD-91-09 FD:mb Attachment cc: J. Baier, C.E., SCDHS ~~ I"~ [i'> r:; n\>, \!) I~ .', n~ 5 "I IS, -, ' , , . ." 'I ~ji:;, n i " _,', , ,,\ I" >' ' lU ' ,.'",.' l-' l 'oO~lHOLO lawN $t MINING aOAHO VETERANS MEMORIA.L HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE. L.l.. NEW YORK 11788 (51 Gl 360-5192 ,e) e() II - <- File No. S-SD-91-09 ,esolution No. ZSR-91-155 of Suffolk County Planning Commission Pursuan: to Sections AI4-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on September 17, 1991, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Ethel H. Betz" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting premises located on the northeasterly side of Calves Neck Road, 1208 + feet southeast of Youngs Avenue in the Town of Southold, and WHEREAS, said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its meeting on October 2, 1991 and WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to disapprove said referral, Be It Therefore RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Be It Further RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is disapproved for the following reason: Creation of a subdivision with substandard lots, that is, lots whose areas are less than the minimum required by the zoning classification of the property, constitutes an overintensification of land use. Such action could establish a precedent for future subdivision of this kind which would essentially be a circumvention of the Town Board's action taken over the past years to up zone the area in order to bring it more into conformity with modern lot area and planning standards and to limit density. Motion by: Commissioner Shepard Seconded by: Commissioner Lee Commission Vote: 11 Present Yeas Nays Abstentions 10 o 1 Commissioner McDonald Dated October 2, 1991 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission ,~ ~ CRAMER, V~ AsOCIATES ENVIRONMENT~G CONSULTANTS . 5u13f/t.E^ 1'6 ,;(K / vS Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Ethel Betz Minor Subdivision SCTM# 1000-063.00-07.00-34.000 & 35.000 November 6, 1991 m ~ @ fI"rlfif',. Ii: NOV - 8 1991 S . J SOUTHOLD TOWN PlANNING BOARD Dear Benny: As per your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CV A, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The project is currently used for a single family residence (located on Lot 35) _ in addition, there is a well pit located on Lot 34. The site totals 1.281 acres in size. The proposal involves the division of property into one 0.68 acre lot for an existing residential home (Lot 35) and one 0.60 acre lot (Lot 34) for a future residential structure. The subject site is adjacent Town Creek and is in a Critical Environmental Area. This site is zoned R-40, requiring a lot yield based upon 40,000 square foot lots or greater. The proposed project is currently grandfathered from the Suffolk County Sanitary Code Article 6 due to the fact that the lots were established as single and separate tax parcels prior to January 1, 1981. Field inspection finds that the northern portion of the site adjacent to Town Creek has littoral zone tidal wetlands at the base of the slope below mean high water (mhw). The land in this area rises from the beach area to the top of the bank, approximately 10-40 feet landward of the beach. The existing home is located on flat upland terrain, approximately 50 feet away from the top of the bank. The remainder of Lot 35 includes a driveway and landscaped areas with accessory structures attached to the house. This lot contains extensive natural vegetation leading down to the waters edge and the slope is stable. Lot 34 is the 0.60 acre lot, that was merged with Lot 35 during the Town's upzoning to R-40 in this area. The center of the site contains a lawn area with ornamental species (such as rhododendrons) and specimen tree remaining throughout the site. The trees are predominantly situated near the waters edge and the western perimeter of the site. The specimen trees include white oak, sugar maple, pine and ornamental plant species. Page 1 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 -. . . Detz Minor Subdivision Long EAF Review In the terms of project impacts the use of Lot 34 for the purpose of a subdivision and the ultimate construction of a single family dwelling must be considered. Based upon a hypothetical house layout in conformance with zomng and wetland setbacks, extensive clearing may!1Q1 be necessary for the location of a house, due to the cleared areas in the location of the well and the eastern perimeter of the lot althouldI some mature trees will need to be removed. The house can be located in accordance with R-40 zonin~ setbacks, and can also be situated 100 feet or more from the high water mark. This hypothetical building envelope is relatively flat, therefore minimum or no topographic impacts will occur. An additional consideration is density. The Health Department normally requires minimum lot sizes of 40,000 square feet for groundwater protection purposes. This density is recommended in consideration of sanitary disposal from a sin21e family dwelling, as well as typical suburban lawn fertilization, the basis for which was established through the 208 study. U.S.-Census figures indicate that population density at the time of completion of the 208 study was 3.25 persons per dwelling unit. At present, the population density in Southold Town is 2.42 persons per unit. The proposed density for the Betz minor subdivision would result in a density of 1.6 units per acre, with a total population average of 5 persons. Based up-on this density, the Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (SCCWRMP, 1987) indicates that conservative concentration of nitrogen in recharge would be in the range of 8 mg/1. Empirical results and monitoring conducted for the SCCWRMP indicate more realistic nitrogen discharge concentrations of less than 5 mg/1. It is noted that there are no private wells downgradient of the site, and the division of land would not set a precedent for further subdivision of substandard lots in the area, as most lots are already in the size range of 25,000 to 30,000 square feet. For these reasons, we do not anticipate significant adverse impacts from project density or groundwater impact. Given the fact that the project does involve the creation of a substandard lot along Town Creek in a Critical Environmental Area, the Plannin~ Board may wish to consider the following additional safeguards to further reduce potential impact: . Further review by tbe Planning Board could be conducted at the time of the building permit application, in order to insure the stability of erodible soils in a slope area which is pitched toward the beach. A grading plan submitted in connection with the building permit would assist in this review. . We suggest that any future site use be in excess of 75 feet of the landward high water mark. It should be noted that any activity on Lots 34 and 35 within 75 feet of the wetlands will require a wetlands permit from the Town Trustees. The applicant is encouraged to situate the dwelling more than 75 feet from the wetlands. . Natural vegetation on the western perimeter of the site should be preserved in order to provide buffering, natural setting and minimize use of fertilizer. Based upon this review, and if the Board is in agreement, we feel that a Negative Declaration is appropriate for this project. I hope this letter provides the Board with the information needed to complete the review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to caU if you have any questions. enc: Part 1/11 LEAF SOCIA TES G CONSULTANTS Page 2 ).' .16-2 (2/87)-7c ( (. Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner. whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly. there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition. many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly. comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM . t . SEQR " 01 . Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses en identifying the range of possible impacts that may Occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE_ Type 1 and Unlisted Actions ( Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project, ;g. Part 1 .;it Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate). and any other supporting information. and conSidering both the magi tude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: o A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a signjficant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. o B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prep.ued. . A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions C -;-;;e I !3 e fi. Name of Action l;wn 0-9 5ou-tholct PICLnn InS Name of Lead Agency Boa..-rd Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date . - 1 " _.r i-PROJECT INFORMATIO'- Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action propo,ed may have a significant efff on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be c'onsider as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification ilnd public review. Provide any additior information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. . It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol new studies, research or investigation. If information reqUIring such additional work is unavailable, 50 indicate and speci each instance. NAME OF ACTION Rthel H. Betz LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Calves Neck Road, Southold, NY SCTM#1000-063.00-07.00-034.000/035.000 NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR I BUSINESS TELEPHONE Rudoloh H. Bruer, Agent (516) 765-1222 ADDRESS Main Road , P.O. Box 1466 CITY/PO I STATE I ZIP CODE Southold NY 11971 NAME OF OWNER (II dilferent) I BUSINESS TELEPHONE Ethel H. Betz ( I ,~~SS I Calves Neck Road CITY/PO r STATE I ZIP CODE Southold NY 11971 - DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Separate two tax lots which have become one due to zoning merger. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project. both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: DUrban Dlndustrial DCommercial lDResidential (suburban) DForest DAgriculture DOther 2. Total acreage of project area: 1.281 acres. APPROXIMA TE ACREAGE SEE ATTACHED SURVEY PRESENTL Y AFTER CO,'v\PLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) ccJ.;;lJ4N/A acres . N/A acres Forested ~ 13N/ A aCres N/ A acres Agricultural (Includes orchards. cropland. pasture. etc.) N/ A JCrt'S N/ A Jcres Wetland (Fresh;"'ater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL) See survey .(4 acres See Survey acres Water Surface Area See survey acres See survey acres Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) N/ A dcres N .A. acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces . 134 See sruvey Jcres See survey acres Other (Indicate type) # 2SJ4 N / A ,'cres N/ A acres 3. What is predom.inant soil type(s) on project site? Brown dirt RIYt::-R.he.acl. - PILfl110UM Serli a. Soil drainage: DWell drained % of ~ite . ~Mod".rilt<ili' well drJined 1m % of site DPoorly drained % of sile TyPes YIC, RdAi P-'-A b. If any agricultural land is involved. how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through ~ of the NYE Land Classification System? N/ A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). \. 4. Are there bedrock outcroppmgs on project site? DYes [l'JNo a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) DRural (non-farn- 2 s. ~~,pproximate percentage of proposed pr. ( site with slopes: 'PLEAS~ NOTE HIGH CONTOUR LINES [JO.l0'~;' ;1,0&" l]g15%Or~ := fO-15':~) go 0' o ," ,0 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places' DYes ltlNo ( '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural landmarks' DYes llJNo 8. What is the depth of the water table' (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes lXJNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? :[lYes DNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is ideptlfied as threatened or endangered? DYes ~No According to Flt:LP .:cn:::>~e.IICV"" ts'i L'/A Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (Le., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) QgYes DNo Describe Creek front 13, Is the project site presently used'.by the community' or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes llJNo If yes. explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes KlNo 1 S. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N / A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 18. Lakes. ponds, w~tland areas within or contjg.3ous to project area: a. Name 10 W r. eRe. c. IS.. b. Size (In acres) Is the site served by existing public utilities? QgYes DNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [lYes DNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DYes 'JNo Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2S-AA, Section 303 and 304? DYes QgNo Is the site located in or substant.ially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECl. and 6 NYCRR 617? )iiClYes I.jNo Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes [XNo 16. 17. ( 19. 20, c B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) 1!!.E ATTACHED SURVEY a, Total contiguous acreage owned or c~trolled by project sponsor I. '2$1 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: ,t>Q4 acres initially; ,59'1 acres u.ltimately. _\ c, Project acreage to remain undeveloped . (P<i acres. {E:x l?'-: 51I<vC-Tur~ ~ on 1013=-.} d. length of project, in miles: ;J/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed I\(/A %;, f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing AI/A ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour - (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially I 6XlbT." Ultimately ~ i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure Alj'A- height; width; length. ;. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. 3 -- - . (. .'2. How much natural ~dtenal (i.e.. r! earth, etc.) will be removed from the Slte' 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes DNo ffiN/A a. If yes, for what intendet: purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes N/A tons/cubi~ yar~s. DNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? N/ A acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes 0No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction _Unlpo~ months. (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a, Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d, Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes IKJNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction N/A Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~/A- (number). month month DYes year, (including demolition). year. DNo ; after project is complete A.I/A 10. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? IV/A Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes IZINo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [iJlYes DNo DYes IKJNo If yes, explain 12. N/A 13. Type Cesspool 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? DYes DNo Explain N / A 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes [iJlNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes IXINo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes UilNo c. If yes, give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes DNo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes ~o a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes KlNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes @No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ,ambient noise levels? DYes 21. \Vill project result in an increase in energy use? DYes IJNo If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/ A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? DYes lONo If Yes, explain UNo 4 H. .Approvals Required: ~ City, Town, Village Board DYes UNo ( City, Town, Village Planning Board )!-res flNo City, Town'Zoning Board IOYes DNo City, County Health Department IOYes DNa Other Local Agencies DYes UNo Other Regional Agencies DYes flNo State Agencies IOYes DNa Federal Agencies DYes ~No ~ Submittal Date Type .sUbd /1115/0/\/ Variance 7/26/Jtl Setoff -!!h1AJDrAr/fF-PeL> When Applic EeRartme~t of Environmental o serva Lon - varlance ~L91 c. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ){]Yes DNa If Yes, indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment rozoning variance Dspecial use permit ~ubdivision Onew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother What is the zoning c1assification(s)of the site? R- 40 What is the maximum notential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? .~ ~?, 6 ToliZ./Es . /orOG~O-UPA A./y Z-O,?,~ What is the proposed zoning of the site? R- 40 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Dsite plan 2. 3. 4. S. ( 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? KJYes ONe What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '14 mile radius of proposed action? R-40.,- -Sln:Jle- P"e?/J7ILV hOU.:5lnS Is the proposed action compatible with adjOining/surrounding land uses within a V. mile? K]Yes DNa If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? :;;L a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Lor.3 4- - , tot) a..c .ee.., ~ Lor d5 - , ~.?t{a!Je' / Will proposed action require any authorization(sj for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes I1QNo Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? DYes DlNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes DNa 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic Significantly above present levels? DYes JONo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to hondle the additional traffic? DYes DNa D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify y). ~e information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ' APpllcant/Spo~{-;jme t~tr; H. Bruer Date 8/;:j/91 Signalur! Q<(;~tJ:. ~ :.A--_ Title Agpnt II the act~~n the .stal Area, and you are. state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with Ihis assessment. ( 5 r( .t 2-PR~CT IMPACTS AND ( IEIR MAIITUDE Responsibility of lead ,.\gency General Information (Read Carefully) . In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations beer reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. . Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact. must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. . The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. . The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. . In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any in'pact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impa~t. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by changers) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo [l 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 tJ DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo L \. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ~O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per lOa foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. . Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. . Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. . Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. . Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 Ions of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. . Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. . Construction in a designated floodway. . Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t'. .."y un,que or unusual land forms found on the sote' (i,e., cliffs, dunes, geolog'cal formations, etc.)~NO DYES . Specific land forms: , IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24. 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) DNa 13vES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Developable area of site contains a protected water body. . Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. . Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. . Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. . Other impacts: ( 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? %No DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . A 10% increasp. or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. . Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. . Other impacts: 5" Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantityl ~O DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. . Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. . Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacit-y. . Construction or operation c.t:using any contamination of a water supply system. . Proposed Action will adver5~ly affect groundwater. . Liquid effluent will be conve\"Eu off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. . Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. . Proposed Action will likely ca",,, siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the exte:-:t that there will be an obvious visual contrast to naturc::i conditions. . Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. . Proposed Action will allow residential llses in areas without water and/or sewer services. . Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses whi-ch may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. . Other impacts: ( l 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or water runoff? DNa Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would change flood water flows. , sl.J.!/ace !j\V E 5 7 1 Small to Moderate Impact ~ o o ~ o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ." 2 Potential Large Impact o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DVes DVes DNo DNo DVes DVes DVes DNo DNo DNo DVes DNo DVes DVes DNo DNo DVes DVes DNo DNo DVes DNo DYes DNo DVes DVes DNo DNo DVes DNo DVes DNo DVes ONo DVes DNo DVes DNo DYes DNo DVes DNo <. . . Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. . Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. . Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? .K;1NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. . Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. . Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 Ibs. per hour or a heat Source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS J. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or enda~'7"red species? )l;JNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of One or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site, OVer or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other imp~cts: Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non.endangered species? DNO fj(YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident Or nigratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ;-}roposcd Action requires the removal of more than 10. acres ,f mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important 'l'gctation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? P(NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 he proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural nd (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) B ~,' '- 1 3 Small to Potential Can Impact 8e Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change ;gl' 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo ( (C i l- i_ Ll- '" . ( . Construction activity would excav~1te or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. . The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. . The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? )PNO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21. Appendix S.) Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. . Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic reSOurces which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic Qualities of that reSOurce. ( . Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? .B$NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. . Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. . Proposed Action will Occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future Open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 JiliNO DYES l . The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. . A major reduction ot an open space important to the community . Other impacts: 9 . 1 2 3 Small 10 Potential. ' Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Cliange 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo .. 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes' DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 14 ':~ACT ON ,; NANSPORT~N \ViII there be an effect to existing transportation Sysl9ms' KINO Examples that would apply to column 2 . Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. . Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. . Other impacts: DYES IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. . Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. . Other impacts: SOUf:JS of fuel or )VNO DYES NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. IVill there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibrat:3" as of the Proposed Action' 9\NO Examples that would apply to column 2 Olasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other f.1Crlity. . Odors \ViII Occur routinely (more than one hour per day). . PropOsed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ,lmbicnt noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise Screen. a result DYES sensitive Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safet!/ ~NO DYES Exomples that would apply to column 2 Pronoscd Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of JCcrdcnt or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low. level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes'" in any orm (Le. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritat;ing, nfCClious, etc.) itor,lJ.:C f acilitics for one million or more gallons of liquified ll<1tural cls Or other f1.1mmab/e liquids. lroposcd action may result in the exc.lvc1tion or other disturbance 'Ith,n 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous aSfc. lfhf'r irnp.lcts: 10 r 1 Smel" to Moderate Impact o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 2 Potential Large Impact o o o o o o o o o o 3 Can. Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change, o o o DYes DYes DYes o DYes o DYes o DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes ( DNa DNa DNa DNa I ! I DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa ( DNa I L- DNa DNa L DNa I , ! i i , , L I _ '--I , DNa DNO DNa , ~. . . , " 1 2 3 .. IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By (,18 Will proposed action afiect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the 0 0 DYes DNo project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%, . The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services 0 0 DYes DNo will increase by more than" 5% per year as a result of this project. 0 0 DYes DNo . Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals, . Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use, 0 0 DYes DNo . Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures 0 0 DYes DNo or areas of historic importance to the community. . Development will create a demand for additional community .services 0 0 DYes DNo (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) . Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. 0 0 DYes DNo . Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. 0 0 DYes DNo . Other impacts: 0 0 DYes DNo 19, Is there, or is there likely to be, public potential adverse environmental impacts? controversy related to Ji;lNO DYES ( If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s), 3. Oased on the information available. decid.e if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: . The probability of the impact occurring . The duration of the impact . Its irreversibility. including permanently lost reSources of value . Whether the impact can or will be controlled . The regional consequence of the imfhlct . Its potential divergence from local needs (lnd goals . Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) _ l 11 '. '. ( ~ ( .l 617 .21 Appendix B Slate Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum " ~ (To be completed by Lead Agency) . o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o SEOR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. 1 Distance Between Project and Resource (in Miles) 0.1/4 '.4.'12 112.3 3.5 5+ 00000 o o o o o o o o o o o 14.14.11/:' 37)-9c " Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: . A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use. enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man~made scenic qualities? . An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? . A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? . State Parks? . The State Forest Preserve? . National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? . National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? . National Park Service lands? . Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? . Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System. or Amtrak? . A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter.county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? . A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? . Municipal park, or designated open space? . County road? . State? . Local road? o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screen'ed by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) DYes ONo 3. Are any of the resources checked in question during which the project will be visible? DYes ONo 1 used by the public during the time of year . c . DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. Fram each item checked in questian I, check thase which generally describe the' surraunding environment. . . " Essentially undevelaped Farested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial Cammercial Urban River, Lake, Pand Cliffs, Overlaaks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed ,~ ". . I.. Within 0'/4 mile 01 mile o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *'12 mile DYes DNa '1 miles DYes DNa '2 miles DYes DNa '3 miles DYes DNa . Distance fram praject site are pravided for assistance. Substitute ather distances as apprapriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number bf viewers likely to, abserve the propased project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable ar unkno,wn, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation ar activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the prapased actian is Activity Travel to, and fram wark Involved in recreational activities Rautine travel by residents At a residence At warksite Other Daily o o o o o o Weekly o o o o o o FREQUENCY Holidays/ Weekends o o o o o o Seasonally o o o o o o 2 . . uti t!JFIt.-e-- tis ~~ ~ fJ8~ ATTORNEYS....TLAW MAIN ROAD ~ P.O. BOX 1466 SDUTHOLD. NEW YORk 1 1971 LEF"F"ERTS P. EDSON (1912-1989) RUDOLPH H. BRUER (516) 765-1222 (516) 765-2500 FAX: (5 16) 765-2752 October 25, 1991 Southold Town planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Betz Ethel H. SCTM/1000-63-7-34 & 35 Sirs: Dear Enclosed herewith please find a copy of the health department approved survey map. Sincerely, h1~~~~BI-f1Ywy~ U~~,lif: I Enc. ~ 8 W ~ ~ OCT 2 8 1991 W1... SOUTHOLD TOWN .,"1 PLANNING BOARD . T . o ~)(;6F/G-e tis (516) 765-1 222 (516) 765-2500 (i?" ~ /. FAX' (5 16176Ji-2752 __ O'/-Ir - /~/.Az - ~I?:fecz..fi4 -/7- r f~-'- 11ilr/;J7(~ - - j./lc'/._1Z-C: c.'A:e'; ~A-d~~ z/ A~ ---Lc:V~-%o-y../' /hd,!,(('" /<L&< ~/V.A' G'~ and fJ8/?<Ue?< ATTORNEYS AT LAW MAIN ROAD - P.O. BOX 1466 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Lt""ERTS P. EDSON (1912-1989) RUDOLPH H. BRUER October 25, 1991 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 /1. / - / / -'- 0;;,,---,,/ 1;t' ,/" ,r"j-J"--A:./~ ,r-'t:,1' ,/ / Re: Betz Ethel H. SCTM#lOOO-63-7-34 Sirs: & 35 Dear Enclosed herewith please find a copy of the health department approved survey map. Sincerely, ~ ~ "/2 ( - / (L ~ tlvk<-<- ~~t/~ Bruer ("""'- RHB/ earn' Ene. rnm @ ~ n w ~ 00 '. ~I :,,;:!..,. SQUTHOLD TOWN "'t.,....-' PLANNING BOMlO < i~r~,~~!:l~ SOU1FlOUllOW~ ,'P':', ..;.';,","r pU.NNING BOA INE R-40 '(}-63-07-34 = 26,097 sq.ft. '9-63-07-35 = 29,692 sq.ft. 1= 55.789 sq ft. (or 1.281 acres) I . 4~ Sc.. 1". BOO' J SURVEY OF PROPERTY A T SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000 - 63 - 07 - 34 & 35 Scale 1" = 100' June 3, 1991 SEPT 4, 1991 (bldg envelope) .. /) ~~ ~ . :~r.~f?f.~'-.~~~.Rl.~'2;.(.... DIVISION Of PUBLIC "EAlTH . , DEPT. Of HE~ltH SERV1CES.SUf~~Kt~UNIY . . HAUPPAtJj;E, N.Y. 7 {', .1891 . . ". - ~'/f- Y.s. LIe. NO. 496; YORS, P.e. NY 11971 . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK . (g Suiftlk: Pb RK \IS PATRICK G. HAL.PIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING October 3, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - Ethel H. Betz Northeasterly side of Calves Neck Road, 1208 + feet southeast of Youngs Avenue, Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on October 2, 1991, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Ethel H. Betz" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning Planner Division File: S-SD-91-09 FD:mb Attachment cc: J. Baier, C.E., SCDHS ~ ~ ~ n w ~ J i' I"~ OC1 -11991 ~)i ~ VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE. L.l.. NEW YORK 1 1 788 (!5 1 En 3SQ-!51 92 SiiUlI\OI,!l TOWIl PlN!!ill!!i 8OARO . . . File No. S-SD-91-09 Resolution No. ZSR-91-155 of Suffolk County Planning Commission Pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on September 17, 1991, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Ethel H. Betz" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting premises located on the northeasterly side of Calves Neck Road, 1208 + feet southeast of Youngs Avenue in the Town of Southold, and - WHEREAS , said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its meeting on October 2, 1991 and WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to disapprove said referral, Be It Therefore RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Be It Further RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is disapproved for the following reason: Creation of a subdivision with substandard lots, that is, lots whose areas are less than the minimum required by the zoning classification of the property, constitutes an overintensification of land use. Such action could establish a precedent for future subdivision of this kind which would essentially be a circumvention of the Town Board's action taken over the past years to upzone the area in order to bring it more into conformity with modern lot area and planning standards and to limit density. Motion by: Commissioner Shepard Seconded by: Commissioner Lee Commission Vote: 11 Present Yeas Nays Abstentions 10 o 1 Commissioner McDonald Dated October 2, 1991 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission I I II , I 'I 11'1 '111!'r'I"l'F"~ New Yolrk State De~artment of Environmental Conservation ~ ...... j>l.' ~', ~I:I\ ~P"' cC' , ,08 " ' L)V ' I, I /l-N- I Re:LEAW AGEN yi,d:ooRDlNATlmN R~SPONSE I E. ~<l.\ W IL-T-z. ~ cieef:V,,\ II 't' t 4-7381-~ :nl/oo 10'-0 I This letteI1 r~sp~nds to YO~t comm nica~ion ?f 1: II: ,! I. regarding leaq agencw "coordmat'1, on for the" 'above-d,oted' project unqer Artlcle 8 (State EnV1ironmeT!;tal Quality Review - SEQR) elf the Enviro mental Conservation Law and' 6 NYCRR Fart 617, The Departmen~ has the foI1lowing interest'ip this project: . . ... , ~c 'p'... (' \-C::,.', , ' \low", 'ot ~,O, 'o~'4 ~~~o\~ ~ ~ i , ~",s.sne r .sovtho\ d \\1'\ III ~71 Oc.~. I ~/ Dear N\" ~ q,SSf\er : j-l; DEC Permits' (if any): (; j<<\ WQ.i-\,,-V\~ s t~~l~Lil..\ IC>f\ I 7S - 13gj DEC Contact Person: fi\a..d\ C ~o.rrc..fa... E(\v~rclI\""eA<>..\ A",,\~s+ I SEQR Classification: t><l Type I DEC Position~ [ ] Unlisted , i'i Ii I I , I aSSUmijg ~e~d I agency status for ! Based on the information provided: M DEC haJ no objection to your agency this acHon, , , DEC wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. DEC needs additional information in order to respond (see comments). DEC cannot be lead agency because it has no jurisdiction in this action. Comments: ] see attached [ ] none 'If you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above. please contact this office to resolve designation of lead agep.cy within the time allowable under ' '. Part 617. Please feel free to con tact this office for further information or, I ,..,1 Sincerely. , ~I I E!f\VI I I o (1M e II At\..l y l. ,;1 , i I cc: I , '(attacH disthbution list) ! '1 Ii ili 'III )11 : .. , \. \~ r"..'_ .- ~";,~:~ . )- Li1~6-00. (he <:.. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chaimi.an George Ritchie Latham. Jf. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Scon L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 . hv.. /~ 19'71 RE: Lead Agency yoordination Req~est I Dear Revi,ewer: I II ' . , The pu~poseiof this request is to det!rmine under Article 8 (St9te Envi~onmental Quality Review Act-SE ~)! of the Environmental ConservatioQ Law land 6 NYCRR Part 617 the Ol'l~Wing: I I I 1. Your jurisdiction in the acti n tl scribed below; I I I 'I I I 2. Your: interest! in assuming the Irej>fonsibili ties of lead agenFY; and I: I . . I 3. Issu~s of concern which you belieVe should be evaluated. , )\1\99\ I. Enclosed please find a copy 'of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: !JJlrjo ~ ~~II~~I ~~~~~_d'~Jf}?'!.:;i.1',.?lff r 2- Requested Action: Stll5f)W/S/;'/)" C? 'F So,)'". 7~/.~~;: FooT J-oT //"1(0 T"'-"o .LC:>['r c>~,;(<-t 07>,:,,?4'P1A'~ ~;:::;b~ &- 'l It 'T,;1.., SA.'Atf..: ~t! , SEQRA Classif,ication: (X) Type I ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: Jff Bf"e. J G- flIlSSI'IE R (51 )-765-1938 II --- \ . .UNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HAL.PIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING . \5uCAL.€ Pb RK \IS ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PL.ANNING October 3, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - Ethel H. Betz Northeasterly side of Calves Neck Road, 1208 + feet southeast of Youngs Avenue, Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on October 2, 1991, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Ethel H. Betz" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning File: S-SD-91-09 FD:mb Attachment cc: J. Baier, C.E., SCDHS VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, L.I., NEW YORK 1 1788 (!5161360-l5192 Planner Division ill ~ @ ~ G Vl ~ ,:;' WI'. I" ~ l, - " "." - \ I ..Ie.). SOUTHOLO TOWN PlANNING BOARD / . ~ . . File No. S-SD-91-09 Resolution No. ZSR-91-155 of Suffolk County Planning Commission Pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code \ ~ WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on September 17, 1991, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Ethel H. Betz" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting premises located on the northeasterly side of Calves Neck Road, 1208 + feet southeast of Youngs Avenue in the Town of Southold, and WHEREAS, said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its meeting on October 2, 1991 and WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to disapprove said referral, Be It Therefore RESOLVED, That the Suffolk CountY,Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Be It Further RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is disapproved for the following reason: Creation of a subdivision with substandard lots, that is, lots whose areas are less than the minimum required by the zoning classification of the property, constitutes an overintensification of land use. Such action could establish a precedent for future subdivision of this kind which would essentially be a circumvention of the Town Board's action taken over the past years to upzone the area in order to bring it more into conformity with modern lot area and p1annin~ standards and to limit density. Motion by: Commissioner Shepard Seconded by: Commissioner Lee Commission Vote: II Present Yeas 10 Nays 0 Abstentions 1 Commissioner McDonald Dated October 2, 1991 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission , ."'d'Ol y ,", .~:) .~~ ..., ~l, '~~ ~{.~ [~: 't '.>:~ .":,,,:\ ":.~' ;~._r " "" ,~.,.,....., ' , ,\~/..;\,," '>;' ';"~' ,4 ~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards scon L HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 October 1, 1991 Rudolph H. Bruer Edson and Bruer Main Road P.O. Box 1466 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision of Ethel H. Betz SCTM#1000-63-7-34 & 35 Dear Mr. Bruer: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, September 30, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this Type I action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, ~(J&X~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals ~ - , . ~~ a-i (J8/NUA< ATTORNEVSATL"W MAIN ROAD- P.O. BOX 1466 SOUTHOLO, NEW YORK 11971 LEFFERTS P. EDSON (1.,2-1989) RUDOLPH H. BRUER september 18, 1991 Town of Southold Planning Board Office 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Re: proposed Minor Subdivision for Ethel H. Betz at Calves Neck ROad, Southold SCTM'1000-63-7-34 & 35 Dear Mr. Orlowski: . .::;u. en Ltc R~ liS (516) 765-1222 (516) 765-2500 F'....x: (516) 76S~2752 In response to your memorandum dated September 6, 1991 to Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals (copy enclosed), enclosed herewith please find a copy of a letter dated September 17, 1991 which I received from Gerald W. HiCkson, Ass't Superintendent of P~bl~tilities, which speaks for itself. sl.~rA / / / . cc: I;;' t ill rn@~~w~R SEll f\8 1991 G ~ . . Officers MA YOK WILLIAM R. PELL III 0!Lage 0/ greenport INCORPORATED 11138 NEW INCORPORATION APRIL 1. 1868 RE.1NCOAPOAATION UNDER GENERAL LAW MAY 28. 189. llTIUTY OIo'FICE (5Ih) 477-174K TRUSTEES WILLIAM D. ALLEN STEPHEN L CLARKE JOHN A. COSTELLO GAil. F. I..oRTON ~..., .,. M.................-\:. 'I. . .... .._'. .....J ~:~~~.~j~ _ .'&.""~ ...,,0# I'OWER PI-ANT (516) 477-0172 FAX (516) 477.IIH7 SUPT. 01-' UTll.ITlF.5 JAMES L MONSElL 236 THIRD STREET GREENPORT. NEW YORK 11944 ASST. SUPT. OF UTILITIES fjr.RALD W, IUCKSON September 17, 1991 Edson & Bruer, Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 1466 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Water Availability Tax Map No. 1000 - 63 - 7 - 34 To Whom it May Concern, In response to your request, this letter will serve as notice that the Village of Greenport Water Supply System does supply water to the above referenced property, located at Lot #34, Calves Neck Road, Southold, N.Y. The current owner, Ethel H. Betz, is capable of connecting to our system upon application. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me. , Very truly yours, .~ Lv j 1~'~/'V"Y'. Gerald W. Hickson Ass't. Superintendent of Public Utilities GWH:cr ,"'. -,.-~---_._.'-_.- 1 rn ---.--.."..-...'" .- SEP 1'1,2 1991 , I!-,.o i SOUTHfJlD TOWN PLANnl~G GOARD 1 .... " .. · ,'\\'ifO; f^ . . ~;;. ....ie.'., ,~'..; ,,'~. 0'/' ~ -:<"'~c f~ <~'lo. (~. t.' g ,:j~<U~I'J& "':?" .;; <'..~:~I. t '~\(t~~j,~ :-. " v-: '_"..t,. k.,,_':t.,~, ;~; '" 0 .C.....L-ti:i. ..~ . ., '. .,,," ' .-. '... . ..."---- ~" '<?l ....5" -i;.::s'~, . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S McDlmalJ Kenneth L. EdwarJs scon L. HARRiS Supervisor Town Hall. S3095 Main Road 1'_0_ Box 1179 SoutholJ. New York II inl TL'kphnJlI' {<;lhl 7f/;,- \,nX PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1-";1', (:"16) 7(/:,-IX2:1 DATE: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman,~~qr.IJS September 6, 1991 TO: From: RE: Pending Minor Subdivision for Ethel H" Betz SCTM# 1000-63-7-34 & 35 The following is in response to your request of August 26, 1991, for comments on Appeal No. 4047, Ethel H. Betz. The proposed subdivision will result in two undersized lots in the R-40 Residential Zone. This subdivision is in a critical Environmental Area. It must be considered a Type One action under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act. Also, Health approval should be obtained before a decision is rendered unless the house and lot are served or will be served by public water. cc: Rudolph H. Bruer, Attorney for Applicant / ill!, s~: ",-~: SOUTHOlD TDW~ PLANNiNG BOARD i , _.0 ) . StlUY~ ~K.-p cf'4.- ad Y8~ ATTOFfNEY$ATLAW MAIN ROAD. P.O. BOX 1466 SOUTHOLD,NEWYORK 11971 LEF"F"ERTS P. EDSON (1912-1989) RUDOLPH H. BRUER (S 1 6) 765.1 222 (S 16)765-2500 F"AX: (5 16) 765-2752 September 13, 1991 Clf'Cc- ;;:; (.-,. ~. Town of Southold planning Board Office 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., chairman Re: proposed Minor Subdivision for Ethel H. Betz at Calves Neck Road, Southold SCTMflOOO-63-7-34 & 35 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Thank you for your letter of September 9, 1991. Enclosed herewith please find two checks made payable to the Town of Southold, one in the amount of $630.00, which represents the balance of the application fee, and the other in the amount of $400.00, which represents the fee for the Environmental Consultant. ., -.r..,........... -~.-."" .,..-,c"_. _,:':, '''''~'' ,...- ('\_,-~~ )..., {"\ - 7.'~.:,\~' .',- - '"'% ("'~ ~~ITist:' ~ ""'~ , '.,..,.";,,.-, ;.' ~ ~r:..,\.~..~:'.i.;,. ~ '4..., . ')" "<:' ."'~.-"... . "'- :;?;,.-..'i:F ~". .1f]t ,"\0 --;;:....-.. it I ....1 ~~_ ~ '. rO' . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, J r.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards scon L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765.1938 PLANNING. BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1,4 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 1;2.. , 191/ / Frederick R. Weber, Secretary Southold Fire District Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Weber: Enclosed please find Please notify this of ice as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. ~. Please reply bY,Mo?'O , 1991. Thank you for your cooperation. truly Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. { . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chainnan George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 hit. I~ 19']' RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: fJJlrJO~ SlIl3j){v'IS/or/ at: E rtlEL ii, J?ET.2... .scri?7 #' loco-'6',3-'7-.3Lf..{- .-rS'" Requested Action: SClI5f)WIS/::'"f ~ F S~-, 7~7 S<fY-/#RE FooT ~oT /rJro Two .LoTS af,&:'.;2.~ 0''77.sfj'wP!/f~ ;:;I"':t:r<f- &- ~ h 1';L. Sf/:+.Mtf~ r~t!r.- ' . SEQRA Classification: ()<) Type I ( ) Unlisted Contact person:~f3f'RT-G-. k/;sslfeR (stt) -765-1938 J . The lead agency will determine the impact statement (EIS) on this project. the date of this letter, please respond have an interest in being lead agency. need for an environmental Within thirty (30) days of in writing whether or not you Planning Board position: ()C) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( Other. (See comments below). Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. d::;;udJ~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Board of Appeals * Board of Trustees ~ Building' Department Southold Town Board ~ Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services ~. NYSDEC - Stony Brook ..NYSDEC - l1.UPlJ.y C.C. Dept. of PubTIc-Wurk~ ,\J-.-C. Army Corp of ~s ,N.Y.!::. D<:.pL. u[ 'f.Ldu;,;port:at:iorr * Maps are enclosed for your,review Coordinating agencies , PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards .. SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor " Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOL Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Fax (516) 765-1823 I")., ,1971 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of -fl)IJ'ID~ Su60Iill'sJo1HJ/EI.. il13ei4'Hamlet/Locality So '-1'",/101- P S. C. D. P. W. Topo No.: Zoningjow J}E;j.s/~(f.tfSivt!tT/ML J<'.- ,,/0 S.C. Tax Map No.: Major Sub. Minor Sub. ~Site Plan Cluster_ MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Preliminary Plat (3 copies) ~d Profiles (1) Drainage Plans (1) ___Topogroaphical Map (1) Site Plan (1) Grading Plan (1) --- - Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet ~ CONTINUED , . REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an (Unlisted)~~(Type II)Action. 2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes) (No). 4. The proposed division has received approval from the S.C. Dept of Health. (Yes) (No). Comments: We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) (No) Referral received by Suffolk County and assigned File 19 Planning Commission NO. VO'v tmIv vo~ ) U?~:::ki' J" ; . ^ Chairman Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer- to any of the following questions is ~, please indicate these on your guaranteed surveyor submit other appropriate evidence. 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? ~/J (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) SEE SURVEY ATTACHED 2. Are there any other premises under your ownersh~ abutting this parcel?, (~e~) SEE DEEDS ATTACHED _SCf-iE1:>vL GO '1:," 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes -' ( '-' ,- . \. ~ '" ~~rrQL:( C~~ PL~\V~ING~O~J~p Ej t::; . .:;Jl:."... "i~!" ....:::" TO~.N 01'~'S,O.U'- ;HOLD Ii ".~,,:,;,. .-:- N '~~~"!~," ".,r , ~1\j SUFFOLK:-::eO.fr TY - "1//' "V .J. _::J. 1\ ",-{ 4 " Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TOTHE PLANNING BOARD 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other ~ department or agency? (Town , State, County, etc.) Yes Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, Department of Envir mental 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? Yes 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? Yes 7. Does this property have a valid certificate of occupancy, if yes please submit ,a copy of same Yes I ce~tify that the above statements are true on~ ~ Plaryn~.nnJA B~ard in con,side_~ng ~his /J(" c.(;~ '1 J\.!-f(->v-,- (-::;: {"__./ Slg-nature' f property owner or- authorized agent '- No No (N0 ~., No of ConservatiOI G 6:> c0 and will be reliea applicCltion. , / 55/-';; cr ( date . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards scon L. HARRIS Supervisor ..'~ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 September 9, 1991 RUdolph H. Bruer Edison and Bruer Attorneys At Law Main Road P.O Box 1466 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Ethel H. Betz at Calves Neck Road, Southold Zoning District: Low-Density Residential (R-40) SCTM* 1000-63-7-34 & 35 Dear Mr. Bruer: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $ 400.00 from their Environmental Consultant to review the Long Environmental Assessment Form. The above mentioned sum must be paid in full by your client before we can authorize our consultant to proceed with the review. The check should be made payable to the Town of Southold. When the consultants complete their review, the Planning Eoard will consider their findings in making a determination of whether the project will have a significant environmental impact. Also, to confirm Mr. Kassner's conversation of September 5th with a member of your staff, we have not received the payment of the entire application fee. Your letter of August 14th indicated that a check in the amount of $2,000 was enclosed. The amount on the check was $1370, as noted on the enclosed copy of the receipt. Please remit the outstanding balance of $630.00. -, . Page 2 Ethel Betz If there are any questions please contact this office. Very truly yours, ~~.q-/dc""?,,~lc-t. 4~ It/< Bennett orlowski, Jr. /-. (S Chairman Encl. . (' , . _ _ .,- """""il........., A_'_ ..._.--..._-...._-...__._.."...__._... I TOWN CLERK t TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD l.."~ e.-.,. N~ Yo.' "'~"'M' , 406~;~/1 RECElVED OE (''''(k,-' (/~~ E._ , -I "-j!(L;;-~'<~~//; ,,~v/ -,<,J.'/<~'--,~~j oC~J," I For ), c,), 'v 0>4<.""'-0# '1(Cs:!:-~.-V{4__P , i Cash 0 Check tf Jd ') '1/ By ( /~--L t +-- _I"llf ..I_I~T_I_I_I_'_J_ ...... -..... 1"1 _,_ .,. _1"!",-.,a'.1_1_ 'f _ _ _I___.~. -j :J ..... . f. ~-. "'- - ~ ~ ~ "UU__,'.' ;~ ~\\ffOl~;;~c, "~v "a'i' ,'~ '%:~, :::J -.::. :,0 . ~; en ;~ \>': <\ 0... 4,{~ '>'"", >" "/1t,:, . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 DATE: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman,~~qr,IJS September 6, 1991 TO: From: RE: Pending Minor Subdivision for Ethel H. Betz SCTM# 1000-63-7-34 & 35 The following is in response to your request of August 26, 1991, for comments on Appeal No. 4047, Ethel H. Betz. The proposed subdivision will result in two undersized lots in the R-40 Residential Zone. This subdivision is in a critical Environmental Area. It must be considered a Type One action under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act. Also, Health approval should be obtained before a decision is rendered unless the house and lot are served or will be served by public water. cc: Rudolph H. Bruer, Attorney for Applicant . ~ ') , ~ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1809 l SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 62A eF) u;- pe Js INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Ben Or: ..ski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board ATTN: Melissa Board of Appeals ~ August 26, 1991 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Pending Subdivision Review - Philip F. Betz Attached is a copy of the set-off proposal by Philip F. Betz concerning his premises at Calves Neck Road, Southold, which we understand is a new application currently being reviewed by the Planning Board. We have previously furnished copies of this file to you, but have attached additional copies for your convenience. You should provide recommendations or comments at this time concerning those elements which may affect your jurisdiction under the subdivision regulations. You should note the following: Zone District: Total Number of Lots Proposed: Existing Dwelling(s): R-40 Two One If we do not receive your comments within 30 days of this referral (to wit: September 25, 1991), we will assume that you have no comments or Objections to the general layout as submitted. The legal notice of publication will be prepared for distribution to the newspapers on Monday, September 9, 1991. Thank you for your cooperation in this coordination. 21 OCIATES G CONSULTANTS ,5[1/3f/[C Ie? /!; //2/.:: / !/S Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Ethel Betz Minor Subdivision SCTM# 1000-063.00-07.00-34.000 & 35.000 November 6, 1991 ill ~ ~ [-~7~-;-i- /:I, I , I' , l-' I SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Dear Benny: As per your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CV A, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The project is currently used for a single family residence (located on Lot 35) _ in addition, there is a well pit located on Lot 34. The site totals 1.281 acres in size. The proposal involves the division of property into one 0.68 acre lot for an existing residential home (Lot 35) and one 0.60 acre lot (Lot 34) for a future residential structure. The subject site is adjacent Town Creek and is in a Critical Environmental Area. This site is zoned R-40, requiring a lot yield based upon 40,000 square foot lots or greater. The proposed project is currently grandfathered from the Suffolk County Sanitary Code Article 6 due to the fact that the lots were established as single and separate tax parcels prior to January 1, 1981. Field inspection finds that the northern portion of the site adjacent to Town Creek has littoral zone tidal wetlands at the base of the slope below mean high water (mhw). The land in this area rises from the beach area to the top of the bank, approximately 10-40 feet landward of the beach. The existing home is located on flat upland terrain, approximately 50 feet away from the top of the bank. The remainder of Lot 35 includes a driveway and landscaped areas with accessory structures attached to the house. This lot contains extensive natural vegetation leading down to the waters edge and the slope is stable. Lot 34 is the 0.60 acre lot, that was merged with Lot 35 during the Town's upzoning to R-40 in this area. The center of the site contains a lawn area with ornamental species (such as rhododendrons) and specimen tree remaining throughout the site. The trees are predominantly situated near the waters edge and the western perimeter of the site. The specimen trees include white oak, sugar maple, pine and ornamental plant species. Page 1 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Retz Minor Subdivision Long EAF Review In the terms of project impacts the use of Lot 34 for the purpose of a subdivision and the ultimate construction of a single family dwelling must be considered. Based upon a hypothetical house layout in conformance with zorung and wetland setbacks, extensive clearing may rull be necessary for the location of a house, due to the cleared areas in the location of the well and the eastern perimeter of the lot although some mature trees will need to be removed. The house can be located in accordance with R-40 zonin~ setbacks, and can also be situated 100 feet or more from the high water mark. This hypothetical building envelope is relatively flat, therefore minimum or no topographic impacts will occur. An additional consideration is density. The Health Department normally requires minimum lot sizes of 40,000 square feet for groundwater protection purposes. This density is recommended in consideration of sanitary disposal from a single family dwelling, as well as typical suburban lawn fertilization, the basis for which was established through the 208 study. U.S. Census figures indicate that population density at the time of completion of the 208 study was 3.25 persons per dwelling unit. At present, the population density in Southold Town is 2.42 persons per unit. The proposed density for the Betz minor subdivision would result in a density of 1.6 units per acre, with a total population average of 5 persons. Based up-on this density, the Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (SCCWRMP, 1987) indicates that conservative concentration of nitrogen in recharge would be in the range of 8 mg/I. Empirical results and monitoring conducted for the SCCWRMP indicate more realistic nitrogen discharge concentrations of less than 5 mg/I. It is noted that there are no private wells downgradient of the site, and the division of land would not set a precedent for further subdivision of substandard lots in the area, as most lots are already in the size range of 25,000 to 30,000 square feet. For these reasons, we do not anticipate significant adverse impacts from project density or groundwater impact. Given the fact that the project does involve the creation of a substandard lot along Town Creek in a Critical Environmental Area, the Planninl! Board may wish to consider the following additional safeguards to further reduce potential impact: . Further review by the Planning Board could be conducled at the time of the building permit application, in order to insure Ihe stabilily of erodible soils in a slope area which is pitched loward Ihe beach. A grading plan submitled in conneclion with the building permit would assisl in this review. . We suggest that any future site use be in excess of 75 feet of the landward high water mark. It should be noted that any activily on Lots 34 and 35 within 75 feet of the wetlands will require a wetlands permit from the Town Trustees. The applicant is encouraged to situate the dwelling more than 75 feet from the wetlands. . Natural vegetation on the western perimeter of the site should be preserved in order to provide buffering, natural setling and minimize use of fertilizer. Based upon this review, and if the Board is in agreement, we feel that a Negative Declaration is appropriate for this project. I hope this letterJ'rovides the Board with the information needed to complete the review of this project. We woul be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. enc: Part 1/11 LEAF arles J. Voorhis, CEP, AlCP ~\ !I/If& CRAMER, VO~~~,A~SOCIATES ENVIRONMENT~~ ':~11iIENINGCONSUL TANTS ~ ~{~~ Page 2 -_.._-~_.~.._..-_..'--' __""-00 "IU-.. \~!0/J-/\.. \. '- " .:,1 " 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR (. Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be signific.1nt. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly. there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of th~ environment or may be technically expert in environmen.tal analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aWare of the broader concerns affectmg the question of significance. . The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly. comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. . Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses en identifying the range of possible impacts that may occUr from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potential/y. large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large. then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions ( Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project.: ~ Part 1 .kit Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magi tude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: o A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. o B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. , A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions c -k:e / !3 e fi. Name of Action lawn 0-9 SOU.tho /0{ P\CLn.., 1;"5 Name of Lead Agency B 0 a...rd Prinl or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Tille of RespollSlble Officer Signature of ResponSible Officer in lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If differenl from responsible officer) Dale . - 1 r ~ PA.. r 1-PROJcCT INFORMATION' Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action propo,ed may have a si~nlficant eft, on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be c'onsider as part of the applicc1tion for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiOi information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. . It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol new studies, research or investigation. If information reqUIring such additional work is unavailable. so indicate and spec each instance. NAME OF ACTION Ethel H. Betz LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and Counly) Calves Neck Road, Southold, NY SCTM#1000-063.00-07.00-034.0001035.000 NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR I BUSINESS TELEPHONE Rudoloh H. Bruer, Agent 1516 ) 765-1222 ADDRESS Main Road , P.O. Box 1466 CITY/PO I STATE I ZIP CODE Southold NY 11971 I -- NAME OF OWNER (If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Ethel H. Betz 1 ) ADDllESS 11~~'Calves Neck Road CITYfPO I STATE I ZIP CODE Southold NY 11971 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION . Separate two tax lots which have become one due to zoning merger. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: DUrban Dlndustrial DCommercial lGResidential (suburban) DForest DAgriculture DOther 2. Total acreage of project area: 1.281 acres. APPROXIMA TE ACREAGE SEE ATTACHED SURVEY PRESENTl Y Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) ..;J.;lI4-N I A acres Forested .44/3NI A acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) NI A aCrt'S Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECl) See survey "4 acres See Water Surface Area See survey "cres Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) NI A dcres d h d f . 134 Roads, buildings an ot er pave sur aces Other (Indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? J. Soil drain.1~e: DWell drained % of s.ite .__~N1od~.ratsll' well dr\'lined I(Y\ % of site DPoorly drained % of sile I YPe'-::' Y/C1 Rd.A, P~A b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil MC classified Within soil group 1 through .1 of the NY land Classification System! N I A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there hedrock outcropplngs on project site! DYes rnNo a. What is depth to bedrock! (in feet) DRural (non-fan AFTER CO,vlPlETION . N/A N/A N/A Survey acres acres acres acres See survey N.A. acres See sruvev acres See survey -2.2-4 N/A acres N/A dirt RI Ve..R.he.a.c( - PII.jl-1lou.th acres acres acres Brown Ser-i 2 ( . I f~O.1 O'~:I 6"U' ,_ 10-1 S '::) QV 0' 5. ~\pproxrm(lte perccnt<1ge of propost'd pro," l 'lIte WI l '1 SODe'S .0 'PLEASE: NOTE HIGH CO"TOUR LI"ES 12j15% or greater 2X:? % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or contain J, building, site, or district. listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places' DYes ltJNo c: " Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural landmarks' DYes KlNo 8, What is the depth of the water table' (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes lXlNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project arca? :[lYes DNa 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is ideptified as threatened or endangered? DYes ~No According to t-\6LP .rn~R;2..C'-(Cv"" ts...../ LVA Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (Le., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) 119 Yes DNo Describe Creek front 13. Is the project site presently used".by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? (JYes KlNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes KlNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/ A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 17. ( 16. lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. NamelO W....... eRe. c. K Is the site served by existing public utilities? 0Yes DNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant Section 303 and 304? DYes 0No b. Size (In acres) KJYes DYes DNo -~No to Agriculture and Markets law, Article 25-AA, 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617' )illYes (~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes' DYes DIN 0 l B. Project Description 1, Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) ~E ATTACHED SURVEY a. Total contiguous acreage owned or c~trolled by project sponsor i ~ 221 acres. b. PrOlect acreage to be developed: , oQ4 acres initially; _ g 59 ~ acres ultimately. _ \ c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped . f.D~ acres. (/::..)( .?r. s-r!'<vcrurc:> 0 n loT 3~.J d. length of project, in miles: rJ/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %;. f, Number of off.street parking spaces existing N / A ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially i c./(lbT" Ultimately b{ i. DimenSions (in feet) of largest proposed structure AI/4 height; Width; length. j. linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare prolect will occupy is? ft. 3 .2. 3. ( How much natural ~dterrtll (i.e.. rock, eJ.rth, etc.) will be rcmc0cd from the site? N/ A Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes DNa QlN/I\ a. If yes, for what intende<: purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNa c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNa 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) w"l be removed from site? N/ A 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this DYes 0No tons/cubk varas acres. project? 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction _Un~no~ months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes (1gNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction A//A AI/A (number). month year. (including demolition) month year. DYes DNa 10. 11. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ; after project is complete "vIA 12. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? A(/A Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes Q;JNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc,) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involvedl rnYes DNa DYes (1gNo If yes. explain N/A 13. Type Cesspool 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? DYes DNa Explain N/ A 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes rnNo 16, Will the project generate solid waste? DYes 11\1 No a. If yes, what is the amoun't permonth tons b. If yes, w"l an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes rnNo c. If yes, give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes DNa e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes KlNo Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ,ambient noise levelsl Will project result in an increase in energy usel DYes DNa If yes, indicate type(s) N/A If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. Does project involve local, State or Federal funding? DYes If Yes. explain DYes ~o tons/month. 18. 19. 20. 21. ~No DYes UNo 22. 23. 24. gallons/minute. ltlNo 4 "'~"~_"'e'____"''''-"",,' .<5. Approv<1ls Required: ( City, Town, Village Board DYes J[]No ( City, Town, Village Planning Board )(Yes j(JNo City, Town-Zoning Board KJYes DNa City, County Health Department KJYes DNa Other Local Agencies DYes J[]No Other Regional Agencies DVes KJNo State Agencies lOVes DNa Federal Agencies DVes 19No 2. 3. 4. 5. ( 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. ( ( Submittal Date Type .sUbd I VI=-IDN Variance 7/26/~1 Se taU - !!rANDrAr/lUeL> When Applic Eegartme~t of Environmental o serva lOTI - Varlance 8/8/91 c. Zoning and Planning Information ,. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? }(]Yes DNa If Yes, indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment ~zoning variance Dspecial use permit ,gubdivision Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Oother Dsite plan What is the zoning c1assification(s)of the site? R- 40 What is the maximum notential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? .~ t/O', 6TO~/cs. /OrOO;;..U'pA /Vy .z..o<;7~-, R- 40 What is the proposed zoning of the site? What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? KJVes ON, What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1f4 mile radius of proposed action? R-40..- ...$In~ije 1"""e1/)?/LV hol..~~/.nS Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '!. mile? KJVes ON, If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? :;;L a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Lor.3~ - ,0()a-c ,ee~ :' Lor 35 - . "'J'qcee / ~ Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DVes I1'JN, Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police fire protection)? DVes DlNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DVes DNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? DVes lONo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DVes DNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may he needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal. please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate 01 avoid them. E. Verific~ltion I certrf. y ~J.. t~e information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Spa .!-.J me . u 01 H. Bruer Date 8/;'-1191 Signaturf '" . , Title A~pnt If the action is in the astal Area, and you are a stale agency. complefe the (O.1st,]) Assessment form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 .-..... r r( .t 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND" IEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) . In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations beer. reasonablel The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. . Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact. must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. . The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. . The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. . In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any irr'pact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will OCcur but threshold is lo';'er than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by changers) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site! ~O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. . Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. . Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. . Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. . Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more thon 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. . Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. . Construction in a designated floodway. . Other impacts 2. \Vill there be an effect t:. ...IY un.que or unusual land forms found on the site! (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)!tlNO DYES . Specific land forms: 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo Ll 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 tJ DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo ( ." ( { IMPACT ON WATER 3, Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15 24 25 of the Environmental Conservation law, ECl) , , DNO 13YES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Developable area of site contains a protected water body. . Dredging mOre than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. . Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. . Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. . Other impacts: 4, Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? )i<1'NO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . A 10% increas~ or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. . Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. . Other impacts: ( S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantityl ~O DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. . Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. . Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. . Construction or operation c<:.using any contamination of a water supply system. . Proposed Action will advers~ly affect groundwater. . Liquid effluent will be conve\"eJ off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. . Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. . Proposed Action will likely cauJ~ siltation or other discharge into an e~jsting body of water to the exte:'1t that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natur~j conditions. . Proposc.d Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. .' Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. . Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses whh:h may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. . Other impacts: l 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or water runoff? DNO Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would change flood water flows. , Sl{rj,lcc ~VES 7 r 1 , 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Chang X1 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo )t::ll 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo ~ . 0 DVes DNo e ....... I " . Proposed Action may cause substa.ntial erosion. . Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. . Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodwoy. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? .K;JNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. . Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. . Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 Ibs. per hour or a heat SOurce producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. . Proposed action will aI/ow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS ". Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endan&"red species' )'YNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site Or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pestiCide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or r/., non-endan~ered species? DNO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 PrOposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident Or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. PrOposed Action requires the removal of more than 10. acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) Or other locally important .,Il'gct.1 tlon. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? flINO DYES Ex'mples that would apply to column 2 he prOPosed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural lnd ('ncludes cropland. hay fields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 ~ 2 I 3 >- , 5m3 II to Potential Can Impact 8e Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Imp3ct Project Change ;Rl 0 DVes 0"'0 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes 01'10 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes ONo ( I (( ~ '-' i Ll~ """".'~ ( . . ~ . Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. . The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. . The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~NO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix S.) Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed land uses, or prolect components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. . Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. ( . Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic. pre- historic or paleontological importance? ,2QNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. . Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. . Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 \Vill Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open sp,lces or recreJtional opportunities? Examples that would ,'pply to column 2 ~NO DYES l . The perm,1nent foreclosure of .1 future rccreJtional opportunity. . ^ mZlJor reduction ot an open space important to the community. . Other impacts: 9 ( 1 2 3 Small [0 Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes. DNa 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 1 IMPACT ON ) tlANSPORTATlON 14 \Vill there be ao effect to existing transportation syst,9ms? KlNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. . Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. . Other impacts: c 10 ~'- 1 2 3 .. Sm~11 to Potontlal Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Imp~ct Project Change. .r '- 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa lr 0 0 DYes DNa 1'- 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNO !'-- 0 0 DYes DNa ( IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. . Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single Or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. . Other impacts: sour:Js of fuel or }\I NO DYES NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS I I I 16 \Vill there be objectionable odors. noise, or vibrat~ as a result of the Proposed Action? lJ.,NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Olasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive f.1Cr!ity. . Odors will OCCUr routinely (more than one hour per day). Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local .lmbicnt noise levels for noise outside of structures. , Proposed Action wi/I remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: (I I I L IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safet;'/. I:){NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous Substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of Jcc1uent or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low" level dischJrge or emission. Proposed Action m.1Y result in the burial of "hazardous wastes'; in any form {i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, IrlfeC[jous, etc.} ~tor.l1;e f.1cilities for one million or more g.1llons of liquified natural ~:Js or other fJ.lmm.1ble liquids. PrOPosed Jction may result in the eXc,lv.1tion or other disturb.1nce .....lth," 2.000 feet of a site used for the diSPosal of solid Or hazardous '\-.1<;re. Jlbe'r IrnpJcts: L , L I .. "-/ , . ( '. IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD rr .18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Il. DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. . The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than- 5% per year as a result of this project. . Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. . Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. . Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities. structures or areas of historic importance to the community. . Development will create a de-mand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) . Proposed Action will set an important pr2cedent for future projects. . Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. . Other impacts: 19 Is there. or is there likely to be. public potential adverse environmental impacts? ( , 1 2 3 Small to Potential , Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo controversy related to ~NO DYES ( If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or l'l1;ore impact(s) is considered to be potcnti<llly I.uge, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s), 3. nased on the information aVililable. decide if it is reasonilblc to conclude that this impJct is important. To answer the question of importance. consider: . The probability of the impact occurring . The duration of the impact . Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value . Whether the impact can or will be controlled . The regional consequence of the imp.1ct . Its potential divergence from local needs and goals . Whether known objections to.the project rel,lte to this imp.lct. (Continue on att<lchmentsJ _ l 11 { .' ( _l 617 .21 Appendix B Slate Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum 14.14.11 (:' 37)-9c i " " ( Sf-OR. This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: . A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? . An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? . A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? . State Parks? . The State Forest Preserve? . National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? . National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? . National Park Service lands? . Rivers designated as National or State Wild. Scenic or Recreational? . Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? . A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter.county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? . A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? . Municipal park, or designated open space? . County road? . State? . Local road? Distance Between Project and Resource (in Miles) 0.'/. '/..';' ';'.3 3.5 5 + o 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o D D D D D D o o o o o o o o o o o o o D D o o o D D D D o o o o o o o o o D o D D o D D o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o D o D D 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e" screen'ed by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) DYes ONo 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? DYes ONo , -.<<.-.-........- --"'...-.......-. f ~ "- DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question I. check those which generally describe the' surrounding environment. Essentially undeveloped Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial Commercial Urban River, lake, Pond Cliffs, Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed .~ ---c-- . I Within *1/4 mile * 1 mile o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 5. Are there visually similar projects within: ";' mile DYes ONo '1 miles DYes ONo '2 miles DYes ONo '3 miles DYes ONo . Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number bf viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is Activity Travei to and from work Involved in recreational activities Routine travel by residents At a residence At worksite Other Daily o o o o o o Weekly o o o o o o FREQUENCY Holidaysl Weekends o o o o o o Seasonally o o o o o o 2 . , ~ ~ ,,"^ /.J.' TOWI'l OF SOUTH OLD. I'lEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO. DA TE ...J.p..~/1.!.......... TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTH OLD, N. Y. 1, (We) ....... ..!';J;h~)...H.... .1l1l.tZ.............................. .of .. .t;:.~.!, Y.\'.!'...J:l.~.".I.<.. .................................................. Nome of Appellant Street ond Number ............. ........... ~.~\\~.h~).!'\............ ...................... ....... ............ ...... ...EX. ..............HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO. .................................... DATED ............J!1.2:319.0............................ WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ...............P.r......P.h:f.).:f.ll..lllll:Z.................................... Nome of Applicant for permit of ........ ........t;:.'!-lY.~.!'...J:l.~.".\<......... ... ........ .......~~!-!!:;h~).!\. ...................NX.......................... Street and Number Municipolity State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ) ( ) ( X) Permit to construct one family dwelling 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ...........~~~!!?...~.~.~.':'.~.:'...~.7.~.\<...~'?H.~.I...~.'?.'!.F.\1.'?M.,...N~.\'!..X9.r.l\...... Street /Hamlet / Use District on Zoning Mop ?~.~.~:..~.c:...l???...~~.:.~.~.~.~.?.~:...~.~.~.:.~.~?...~~.~.~..~;.hr~e~P Owner Ethel H. Betz. as s"rvi"ing Mop No. Lot No. P' 0 rlor wner.Ethel Betz and Philip Rp." tenant 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article III Section 100-30 and 100-11(A) 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is mode herewith (or (please check appropriate box) Xl A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Mop ) A VARIANCE due to lock of access (State of New York Town Low Chop. 62 Cons. Lows Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous oppeal (EOlO (has not) been mode with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for 0 special permit ( ) request for 0 variance and was mode in Appeal No. ................................Doted ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 l)<J A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) is requested for the reason that zoning merged two separate lots purchased at separate times prior to the Southald Zoning Code. Form ZBl (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because applicant will be unable to build or otherwise dispose of the vacant land lot that was merged by inadvertence due to adoption of the zoning codes. Each lot was purchased separately, at different times, by applicant and her husband prior to the establishment of the Southold zoning ordinance, i.e., June 9, 1951 and July 28, 1956. Respectively, applicant and her husband built their residence on one lot relying on the fact that the other lot was a viable building lot (see attached deeds). Failure to separate the lots merged by law will create and has created financial hardship depriving the owner of the true value of her property. That applicant is presently in a nursing home receiving extensive and expensive health care (including round the clock nursing care). The lot must be sold to pay for this intense and costly care now and in the future. That applicant's husband Philip Betz died in 1967 leaving applicant the feeling of being cared for. by having a "nest egg" in the form of two pieces of property at calves 'Neck . That applicant has already believed her property was two separate parcels having continuously received separate tax bills for each property. 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by 011 properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because adjoining land owners have built on their single lots of the same size as each individual lot of the applicant. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because no additional lots would be created. The character of the district would remain the same. Only one additional house will be built. eit water is available. Sworn to th,'s .1 /- day of..................................,T.\\kf................ 1991 ,..................t:;?....................... STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) .........b~~'..:....u~ . Notary "F;~h";"i~'. DDNNA ~,~ CHl1l1K NOTAny rUBI.1C. State of N," York No. "351459. Suffolk CO""lyq-v- Term Exp\re~ August 18, 13_ ----- . 7Pfl "".S<nl ...., riP < .-:-:!':'~"r"'l/, l ," '. '! // ~ TOWN OF SOUTH OLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR f -. ,1--1 APPEAL NO. '-/,j 'T / DATE ....JI:>~I:/....... I TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. I, (We) .........P;,h~),..H.....)j~.tz................... '" ....... . of ...C:.il)..Y."'.?..~.~S.\<.................................................... Nome of Appellant Street and Number ........................~.?~~. t~~;I; ~......................................... ............ Municipality .........J.l:i'...............HEREBY APPEAL TO State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO. .................................... DATED .............8L2319.0............................ WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ...............P.;.:.....P.h;i,l;i.ll..Jle::z.................................... Nome of Applicant for permit of ................9.'!-)..y."'.?..Iil.~.9.\<............. ... .... ..... ..~~!! !;h~M... .................NX...... .................... Street and Number Municipality State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ( ( ) ( X) Permit to construct one family dwelling 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ...........~t~~!I!...~.~.~:~.7.:'...~.7.c.1.<..~'?'!-.~.1...~.'?~J.\\9.J..~.,...N\'ow.:.(9.;:!\...... Street /Hamlet / Use District on Zoning Mop ~.~.~.::..~.:~...:.~??..~~.:.:.:.~.~.?.?.?...~.:.~.:.~.~?...~.~.~.~..~:.hr~e~P Owner Ethel H. Betz. as s'md~ Mop No. Lot No. Pri or Owner Ethel Betz and Philip Rp". tenant 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article III Section 100-30 and lOO-1lIA) 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is mode herewith for (please check appropriate box) Xl A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Mop ) A VARIANCE due to lock of access (State of New York Town Low Chop. 62 Cons. Lows Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 ( 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal 00l0X) (has not) been mode with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( request for 0 special permit ) request for a variance and was mode in Appeal No. ................................Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 (::<) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) is requ~sted for.the reason that zoning merged two separate lots purchased at separate t~mes pr~ar to the Sautnold Zoning Code. Form ZB 1 (Continue on other side) "!(' ? ? ' ,. , ;' I I io.'lii .. " REASON FOR APPEAL Continued STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practicol difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP becouse applicant will be unable to build or otherwise dispose of the vacant land lot that was merged by inadvertence due to adoption of the zoning codes. Each lot was purchased separately, at different times, by applicant and her husband prior to the establishment of the Southold Zoning Ordinance, i.e., June 9, 1951 and July 28, 1956. Respectively, applicant and her husband built their residence on one lot relying on the fact that the other lot was a viable building lot (see attached deeds). Failure to separate the l~ts merged by law will create and has created financial hardship depriving the owner of the true value of her property. That applicant is presently in a nursing home receiving extensive and expensive health care (including round the clock nursing care). The lot must be sold to pay for this intense and costly care now and in the future. That applicant's husband Philip Betz died in 1967 leaving applicant the feeling of being cared for by having a "nest egg" in the form of two pieces of property at calves Neck. That applicant has already believed her property was two separate parcels having continuously received separate tax bills for each property. 2. The hordship creoted is UNIQUE and is not shared by all oroperties alike in the immedrate vicinity of this property and in this use district because adjoining land owners have built on their single lots of the same size as each individual lot of the applicant. 3. The Vanance would observe the Sp",t of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because no additional lots would be created. The character of the district would remain the same. Only one additional house will be built. Cit water is available. STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) /;:; ki}l Jljl ,,,- vf.l""~;;,ar~m.. ';<' Swam to this ...................b........................ day of .................................).\\;I..Y................ 1991 r'I') O' ~ ......_ .. ~~,~>~-...-:J.1<.: . Notary Public /' /""'-o'7(L ...-..'<.;............... <.'Iil: ~lf',T . l',l', It.:;,; : ~::~ r' ; I ,~"; !J~:(:h ':;_ ,\ ~"C! 1 "., 'il~, . {.i~'--' .- ~. $ubntI Pb 'if< ." G'~ ~ (J8/J<NM< ATTOl'\'NEYSAT l.....w MAIN ROAD- P.O. BOX 1466 SOUTH OLD. NEWYQRK 11971 LEFFERTS P. EDSON (, 9 12-1989) RUDOLPH H. BRUER November 26, 1990 (51 6) 7~S.1 222 (S 16) 765-2500 FAX: (S 1 Eo) 765.2752 Southold Town planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Betz property calves Neck Road, southold, NY SCTM #1000-063-07-034 & 035 Dear Sirs: We are the attorneys for Ethel H. Betz, surviving tenant by the entirety to property owned by she and her late husband, Philip F. Betz. The property is located as referenced above and as shown on the enclosed map. We intend, on our client's behalf, to apply for the reseparation of these lots, which have merged. In connection therewith, we respectfully request that you review the information set forth hereinbelow. It is our client's hope that, under the circumstances, you will determine this proposal to be a set-off, rather than a minor subdivision. Tax map Lot #35 was purchased by Mr. and Mrs. Betz on 6/9/51 from L. Barron Hill and Adelaide H. Hill, his wife. After constructing their home on this lot, Mr. and Mrs. Betz purchased the adjoining vacant lot (tax map Lot #34) on 7/28/56 from Helen wickham. These lots were single and separate at the time of purchase and remained so until they merged under title with the institution of one-acre zoning on 11/23/71. Our client, like so many other residents of Southold Town, continued to receive separate tax bills for these lots and felt secure that the lots were indeed separate. Advancing years and illness now confine Mrs. Betz to a nursing home, at considerable expense. The vacant lot was her "nest egg" in the event of such financial burdens. Now she and her family find that the property cannot be liquidated to cover her present needs. NOV 3 n u~o~k H. Bruer --------- HB/ff/ yo Enc. cc: Mr. Frederick J. Herr, Jr. . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards scon L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 December 11, 1990 RUdolph H. Bruer Edson and Bruer Attorneys At Law Main Road P.O. Box 1466 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Betz Property Calves Neck Road, Southold SCTMi 1000-63-7-34 & 35 Dear Mr. Bruer: The Planning Board has reviewed your letter of November 26, 1990, requesting the Board's determination regarding your client's proposal to divide a merged lot. The Board considers this division a Minor Subdivision. If divided, the lots would be undersized under present zoning, and would require review by the Board of Appeals. If you have any questions or require further information or assistance please contact this office. Very Truly yours, ~~~'7k Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals \ .'''; J ~/ / )- .. . :/1 ,;.,---- ...--"7 1-- , /; ATTORNEYS AT LAW $ufJPtL6 PI!; 11.f< ~~ ~ (!g4<Ue4< MAIN ROAD. P.O. SOX 1466 SOUTH OLD, NEW YORK 11971 LEF'F"ERTS P. , DSON 11912-198 Jl RUDOLPH H. I RUER November 26, 1990 (516)765.1222 (51 Eo) 765.2500 F"AX: (516) 765-2752 southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Eetz property Calves Neck Road, 3ithO~.ld . NY ECTM #1000-063-07- & ~ Dear Sirs: We are the attorneys for Ethel H. Betz, surviving tenant by the entirety to property owned by she and her late husband, Philip F. Betz. The property is located as referenced above and as shown on the enclcsed map. ." W~ ..iWl'"_/"~dlk~__I'~;"6ifi!i;'~6i,0.~I'I_~.w"t"r.t;t_/-J thE'!!3e l'Ots, which Pta",. ftt'9'e~ In connection therewith, we respectfully request that you review the information set forth hereinbelow. It is our client's hope that, under the circumstances, '~i~..t__"Il(.;;"__I)'I:O''''&lJ!%.;i .~.....' fill~_::""~[~,i~. ~:...rH'Oil1 Tax nap Lot #35 was purchased by Mr. and Mrs. Betz on 6/9/51 from L. Barren Hill and Adelaide H. Hill, his wife. After constructing their home on this lot, Mr. and Mrs. Betz purchased the adjoining vacant lot (tax map Lot #34) on 7/28/56 from Helen Wickham. These lots were single and separate at the time of purchase and remained so until they merged under title with the institution of one-acre zoning on 11/2: /71. Our client, like so many other residents of Southold Town, continued to receive separate tax bills for these lots and felt secure that the lots were indeed separate. Advancing years and illness now confine Mrs. Betz to a nursing home, at considerable expense. The vacant lot was ter "nest egg" in the event of such financial burdens. NoW she and her family find that the property cannot be liquidated to cover her present needs. Ple::~-1dvise us of your determination. /tl~~ ./!jc..JI-~'Y ~l~~udol~P H. Bruer RHB!j'!B - J Enc. roo"'. Mr t:'...Q~Qr;....1.-- T 0'0..... Tr IU .C_ NQ.OU K~1-/0 !S(f Sft. .0. ()t.O SlEf v.:c. NO. 064 . Afflfo'f.. J~ <>CO., 4 :"'-"'Ot . '" '". .. co, ~. # ~ .1''' r ,. rOltPAItCUNO. "-= SoU .c. ttO. 010-01-014 n. "A'CH ---~-- lUi. - - . . ...--IT C M z [r.r---- U.UI' ..... ."......1. .LL _.,..'IIS ..1 .",,,. '.C 'OLL_'" .11,.,t'l~ u_ 1 1t.C._~ "., .. .1'...., '-'..' 41 ..,.. ,... '1L.....__ ...... .ouc:c :..~~~. Dr ~~~'=.o. ~ I~ "",oo..caaon...._.._1t. ..,-..,_,...,,__01'''' .........clf'I." '''I ....ICI _.U '_et......LIow ,. "r._.OO.....L..._ H. - , --- .... 00.....' l.... --..-- .........!)o..octL_ __.1__.. 1.........LIow ---- l~D1.....l"" __.L._. .....Ne. @ -I". L_' ---- ~..o..o...tllow -_.~.- P.....Ne. n _ ,..__0......'-_ - "" '""- 00...... L_ ,. ~..._.'".Ita. all """"".I_L....... D-IO--.- ,.....,0.-._ ........ c............. ".. .. .., l1-'ltll 1)Atd ... .-.. SOUTHOLO legend In....,. - ~ . ... --.-.-'0 ~.. ...noel.... 1000 ... ... SiC"""""" .0. 0.....(.......;_ 5&, Oro3 . I . i:: : ! . ~ . . ~ i I I ~ . e I . . 'I ~ \'1'[1 ..<.~ { ~ ,; 11 .,.. ,.. 1-[ '; f ,... .. ! ... r f I I 1'1 ~ 11 "'\' I I . I I fHP 9f9f9 l.IL.. ..,.. ..,... ....,. ,....ClI I . r r . . . I I I I I Q.. I I I I I ~~~~~ II ! I ! nfH ! ., j ~ I I . 9 f ~ I j .. 'i . . I I g u @~ ~ ! ! pIn drB r I i ~ , --...- ~ ~ ~ "t X :lQ ~@ ~() N go :' ~ c ;..,,:.z . 0 '< .... ~~-t-< .....~ 00 ' )C :- " ." . . c.n Z~tDVt . ..., C t .. < -n -. -n ~ ~ 0 ;.. > r- lQ~ (, (t ~} ~ ~ I is i'! Gi.:a Ii III 0'1 .' g \}) 8 ~ ,... o --1- WAIN . -~ - . . . e . . ~nu :\ IUi~ n ~ ~ . .'i :.::1" . . c' 0 '" hE..= : I...: :;: I ,- IH' .. ., l'l.f . ., !i.il . ~ . - . n . p ~ II: . II: n ." . . ~ , . . . " ~, ~,. ~" :0::::: ti . ... -._.. I: ffff;! ~ a; 'l' ......" j ~:;;..: I [';:;~' ~ \ I ~ . Ii j;/ ~ . ~ n ~ o . . ."",.... I 8!~!W ial., : , ~!;U ~,- Hff!!! ~ 11;;il W1;, , d .!ili ;'i '~ ~ ~ : ! i :~ ;Ui '" p~i!';,' ~..i _C ~; "J/ ~;. ..>or ~ .1 2:. . 31 V4; 91 . ~ ~ " ~ ~ ji!;J;; > ; c=-- ..------" c' ,~ ~ , I i\ . ~ " ", " i,i , \ i , i j , I ~I' j~ _Ii I} I ,':," 'I" ij II; lllLt; , ! .....; I :' ., I ;4 :,J .; '!41:! '.. 'j ,. ! ., ~ i "-, ~ '" r0 lO o 'I~ " '0 ,: '. ,e ,. 0 ~ 1 0 0' x , 0' ~ ~, ~ 0 ii , ~ , , , . , ,. v e . ~ "'<< <5 C1> ~ ~ v ::;'~ ; : 'i)~:: z ~ v- a ~ ,,_ >- ~ ~~. ~ >- c.. 5 ~u~ a g .i Uo: @g ~ l ~I '~'~I ~ I ; i :: ~ ~ i . I ; i . ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ii,.!:; I, ! ~ ; j ~L d IUUj !!~!~ I ! , : Nal ~. ~..- ~j!lll! Jii11! ,:1 ;m:llill' I~: !~i~; I,! I ~ ", I. Iii ! ~ ~~ 'il' 0' illi~,~L!~1 f~ ~~1!,~1~1;j;J:~!~ tti ~I~~ :~,!~~f':l!:!:~t~t:~~~~il~l ~ t n ". n It f'i, d 'I " Il D" . .... 'l' " , . . ' I" -.--- I f I t N ,,-, w ""< o ~ "c;) CJ) ~ ~ 111 ~ ~ ,.o~4' ~ ~ \ o " \ ~<c; ~ f (i) I 'S '0" ,?O Zo'" E 5 , ~ ~ .. \~ ';J'~ ,0' 0 GOy. 6 ~\ ~~ '!l '00 . .. "Jib ~~ ,~, C, -.l ~o,~ '"9...... ~.\ - " '\.. 1;" o WNERIAPPLICANT : PHILIP P. BETZ & ETHEL H.' BETZ YOUNGS A VENUE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. "'71 Prepared in accordance with the minimum standards for title survey_ a8 tJ8tablished 1..11 .1.- J J A J C'J _J/la,.J -..........A u.."/ ...11 8,1",... ....,1 , CONTOUR LIES ARE REFERENCED TO FIVE EASTERN TOWNS ...~..-..,.. ..~..ft . '0' ~ . N 5 r--- , .- '" ----ro--. "-..... '- ""'- ~,."., ""c......... '-. "'-::~"""'. ----- 'l'i'i'.t" ' , f~1 , "", , ," .... ~ "- SIT. " N \ """6' Sc.. 1"" '00' i , -; ) SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000 - 63 - 07 - 34 & 35 Scale 1" = 100' June 3, 1991 -< 0 ~ t) ~ r 0 J1.-J\' (I) ). ~ ~ E I " . \ ~ ~Q\~~ . ,0 \ 0 ~Go ."~ ~ ~o\J . .,~.~ ~,~ ~ -PO~:~ - -~--- --- ,.,--, ,~-f\\ lI: ~. G_:,__~___<.. - . , LJ if \1 l(~\ JUL 2 6 \~9\ 'u' i \ i BUILDING ZONE R-40 OWNER/APPLICANT, PHILIP P. BETZ & ETHEL H. BETZ YOUNGS A VENUE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 17g77 AREA of 1000-63-01-34 = 26,091 sq. ft. AREA of 1000-63-01-35 = 29,692 sq. ft. TOTAL AREA = 55,189 sq. ft. (or 1.281 acres) ~~~~... ;;:;.2(c~ lAtoit: ~~. '/.' ..c:,\>-;-;;~~:.'~~.":'\ i',,:""" <\,~.'" .. .( ~.r_::'\.'/ " -""'fv '1:'"(., ;.r,.~ .; "J... "',_ (_, ,', '-. -' if';:':". ~\'"-: ", " ....J ,.:.-....;;.~.:.A.. 'Ie.', : "\ ;';';"-: , 'j ;l11;;:~:~!yd;). LIe. / I PECONI&~.:VEYORS, (516) 765 - 5020 P. 0. BOX 909 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.: 11977 ~repared in accordance with the minimum andarda for title aur"e is as ea tablished 'thel.1.A.L.S. and appro"ed and adopted Jr such un by The New York Stat. Land 'tIe Aaaociatlon. " CONTOUR L#IES ARE REFERENCED TO RVE EAS1FRN TOWNS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP. NO. 49618' ,~-~ P.C. ~ N i ~ I , . .~ '"'< C ~ (j) ~ rO~4' <n ~ ~ ~ ~ , V- E S " , , <I> ,to \~~Q,f-~ ,,0 \ 0 ~Ii>O .,6 + 'I10v ~~+ OWNER/APPLICANT: PHILIP P. BETZ & ETHEL H. BETZ YOUNGS A VENUE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11977 Prepared in accordanclI with the minimum standards for titlll suryey_ as eatablished by thll L.lA.L.S. and approYlld and adoptlld for such use by Thll New York Statll Land Title AssociatIon. CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO RVE EASTERN TOWNS TOPOGRAPHC MAP. . ! . r ~ ( ~1 ~ ~ U w m ~I \\1\1 OCT 2 8 I9lI lW . ~lOWlI ".0'.'7 ~ IilW!!! BUILDING Z NE R-40 AREA of 10 -63-07-34 = 26,097 sq.ft. AREA of 10 -63-07-35 = 29,692 s .n TOTAL AREA"= 55,789 sq. ft. (or 1.281 acras) . . , J 1 f . " SURVEY OF PROPERTY A T SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000 - 63 - 07 - 34 & 35 Scale 1" = 100' June 3, 1991 SEPT. 4, 1991 (bldg. envelope) ~ .~ ~ . .'2.r.tpif.~'.~~~.Rl;21...:.. DIVISION Of PUBlIC <<EAlllf.. . DfPT. Of HE~ltH SERVICES. SUflltKflUNTY HNllPAIJf,E, N.Y. (l .1991 . ,.,. - 'l~ Y.s. LIe. NO. 4961 YORS, P.e. N. Y. 11917 "'< <:) ~ (j) ~ ,.o~.." CI) :. ~ ~ E Pr.p#IT.d in accordanc. ""Ith the minimum .tMld#ITda for titl. aur".y. a. ..t.JJhh.d by the L.lA.L.S. MId IIppro".d and adopt.d for auch u.. b, Th. Ne"" York Stat. LMld Title A.aocietlon. J . N 5 \ --- ~____ ,.o~-- V" ~ ~ ",V ------. -~~____c..;';"" ~ l-- "" , . ~^ - "v-'- -~ ~ SI~ ...,,~ ~ ~ 1" It IlOO' SURVEY OF PROPERTY A T SOUTHOLD TOWN OF . SOU THOLD SUFFOLK'COUNT~ N ~ 1000 - 63 - 07 - 34 & 35 ScaltJ 1" = 100' Jun.. 3, 1991 , I 5 BUILDING ZONE R-40 OWNER/APPLICANT: PHILIP P. BETZ & ETHEL H. BETZ YOUNGS A VEMJE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. '1177 AREA of 1000-68-07-34 = 26,097 sq.ft. AREA of 1000-68-07-85 " 29,692 sq. ft. TOTAL AREA = 55,789 sq. ft. (or '.287 acr.s) / CONTOUR LIfE8 ARE RER!RENCI!D TO FIVE EASTfI1IN TOWNS TOP06i/IlAJIHIC *'. · N. Y.s. Lie. NO. 49678 VEYOR$, P.e. 020 P. O. X 909 , ~1Ii~IKJAD ~. If. r. ,." , ! I ~-~ """....- N THE WA TER SUPPL Y AND SEWA6E DISPOSAL FACL/TIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOf'ItCNT COMPL Y WITH THE STANDARDS II Rl!!CJUREMENTS OF THE: SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARnENT OF HEAL TH. ~LV;~ i.5. _rr L#IE . w E HOUSE . ~ II:: , !!:II ~.A7liII I 5' S serMCE' L#IE : ~ i17r i TA><< - ~1'OOl. 10f ROAD ..... o ~ CO) C/) :b. ~ ~ lii?i3h~ol ra.d.~l t'MIH. f'MIIJ: 2'.MA)/ \p 2' MA~ 8"/"1,>1 300 SO. FT. SIDEWALL AReA LEACHING POOL 1 T SI()O. GAL. ,. SEPTIC TAN/( -== .~ 2'M...,S (JRO(/~ ~ATER_ ----'. ,-......... ~, ""","'" -~ 70ttJ\, - ~, . ." '- '- ". >- "- "- .~..,,-~. . " N "'-6" " Sc_ 7". tIOO' / TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TYPICAL PLOT PLAN ~. "O~N . t C'~ ~ r r , t 5 . BY CHARMAH, PLANNING BOARD DATE:' OWNER/APPLICANT, PHILIP P. BETZ & ETHEL H. BETZ YOUNGS A VENUE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 71977 Pr"p.,,,d in accordance with th" min,imum .tlnd.,d. for titl" .urvey. .. ".t.bli.hed by th" L.l.ALS. Ind ."prov"d Ind .dopted for .uch u.. by Th" New York St.te bnd Title A..ocid/on. CONTOUR IMES ARE REFERENCED TO RVE EASTI!RN TOWNS TOPOORAPHIC MAP. BUILDING ZONE R-40 AREA of 7000-63-07-34 := 26,097 sq. ft. AREA of 7000-63-07-35 := 29,692 sq.ft. TOTAL AREA := 55,789 sq. ft. (or 7.287.cres) f HEREBY CEIITIFY THA T THS #.lAP WAS NADE BY us FROIi ACTUAL stHWE'YS COIII'LETDJ ':'/~ T/ltAT ALL CONCRETE: MOMMENT. 6HOIfH TMJ$t . HDlEON AC:: iU.f _T AN) THDf l'OSIT1DNS A/fC c~cn Y $HOWl AN) ALL ~L MiD .~~ALS A/fC ",*"T. J<JHN T. ME'~Y.s. L.8. uc. NO. ..... SURVEY OF PROPERTY A T SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000 - 63 - 07 - 34 & 35 Scale 1" = 100' June 3, 1991 SEPT. 4, 1991 (bldg. envelope) !!Jbr1, ~// ..--- . ~fI/- 2st - -_" _ "_'4 .. ". J ,., ' r; ':i ;~; l'S ~i ~: ~'_, .,' ~ ~ &~ APfiL'~: td;,"" 'v.(JJ "'.-l" I I , . # (f'fAP. 0 ~ 1~1.~) \n)~@lliO\YJ[ l\lli MAR 2 5 1992 ,1 ; ~"",-o'1 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARO M? I 71."lnn .~t 49678 P.C 77977 01 _ HUJ