HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/29/1996
.'
.
.
.
.
~ r +~le- )~{V-!cor
COVVlVV],'Hpc: -h Ie.
Fishers Island Harbor Committce
MINUTES
Friday, November 29, 1996
at l2:30pm at the Utility Offices
Prese n t:
Frank Bohlen, E1by Burr, Chippy duPont (via conference call), Tom
Doherty, Louisa Evans, Leslie Goss, Steve Malinowski, Harris
Parsons, Allie Raridon, Bill Ridgway, Scudder Sinclair.
Margie Purnell, Ken Edwards, Jr., Tom Johnson, Bobsie Macleod
and Bill Wall.
Absent:
Guest:
Steve RidIer, NYS DOS, Coastal Resources Division
NOTE:
Fax your comments on the revised Inspection Form and Tackle ~
to Elby (203) 226-0873 bv Monday. January 7th,
NEXT MEETING: Friday, EITHER April 19 or April 26 at 4:3Qpm at Utility offices
AGENDA:
Channel Configurations
Expiration/Appointment of one year terms
Committee reauthorization by the Town
The Committee reviewed the Suggested Duties of the Fishers Island Bay
Constables. An amendment was made so that patrols in East Harbor are on an "on
call" basis such as Hay Harbor, rather than a "regular" basis.
The Committed discussed candidates for the position of Assistant Bay
Constable in 1997. Leslie explained that she had received notes of interest from
Luis Horn on October 4th (through Louisa) and Dick Hale by November 22nd, She
mentioned that she had wanted to broaden the candidate pool and had reviewed
Committee files for other possible candidates who had applied last time. Former
candidates included Brian Patterson (who has since moved off Island), John Clavin (a
seasonal resident who is aware of the current vacancy and did not submit a letter of
interest), Bill Wall (who is resigning from the job now) and Mike Conroy. Leslie
called Mike Conroy to determine if he was interested in reactivating his candidacy, his
response was yes and that at this point, he had diving equipment and was certified to
dive.
Committee members noted that all three candidates are full time Island residents, have
boats and possess adequate knowledge of the Island's waters.
It was noted that Dick Hale's duties related to his employment at Pirate's Cove Marine
(PCM) keep him out on West Harbor a fair amount as well as provide familiarity with
boats, moorings, tackle, channel and instructional marks, etc....
Several Committee members queried whether or not a conflict of interest existed
between performing Bay Constable duties and the fact that Mr. Hale is the business
manager at PCM. One Committee member noted that on Fishers Island, there will
always be a conflict of interest with any Bay Constable candidate given that the
qualifications a Bay Constable should possess are found in individuals who somehow
make a living on the water in our small community. This Committeeman suggested
(j)
,
that as long as the potential for conl1ict was recognized, thoroughly examined by the
Committee, and the Committee was comfortable, there should be no problems.
Specific possibilities/perceptions of conl1ict discussed included whether or not Mr.
Hale would have time to perform Bay Constable duties due to work schedules at
Pirate's Cove. Leslie suggested that each candidate had applied for the position with a
full understanding of the time commitments and therefore this should not be a concern.
A Committeeman asked about conl1ict regarding transient moorings and permit
issuance to PCM for those moorings and how that is impacted by performance of Bay
Constable duties. It was determined that the transient mooring operation was
completely separate from the performance of Bay Constable duties (other than if
notified a vessel is illegally on a transient mooring, the Bay Constable can ask the
vessel to vacate the transient mooring).
A Committeewoman asked if there were a valid conl1ict between performance of Bay
Constable duties and PCM's annual bid to the Town to provide channel and
instructional marks. It was agreed that there is no relationship between the
performance of Assistant Bay Constable duties and soliciting bids for the Town for
channel and instructional marks. Open solicitation of these bids is performed by the
Head Bay Constable on Fishers Island.
A Committeeman asked if there might be a conl1ict in Bay Constables conducting
"random" inspections of mooring tackle given that Mr. Hale works at PCM which is in
the tackle business. After reviewing the text in the proposed Fishers Island Harbor
Management Plan on mooring inspection procedures, the Committee reiterated that it
should decide on an annual basis (if necessary) which moorings would be "randomly"
inspected and ask Bay Constables to perform those visual inspections or identify a
small amount of money and hire a diver as there are several on the Island The
Committee determined that random tackle inspections are a sound way to monitor the
integrity/credibility of the inspection forms returned by mooring permittees.
A Committeeman asked Louisa if the Town Board would have a problem with this
recommendation. Louisa expressed hope that the Board would honor the Committee's
thorough analysis of candidates and their recommendation which she would
communicate to the Town.
.
.
Luis Horn was recognized as a strong candidate given his life-long residence on and
familiarity with Fishers Island A Committeeman queried about his work schedule at
z&s and if it would interfere with performance of his duties. Leslie reiterated that each
candidate had applied for the position with a full understanding of the time
commitments and therefore this should not be a concern. There was a question about
whether Mr. Horn would need dockage for his boat Leslie mentioned that currently
the Town does not provide dockage for the Assistant Bay Constable, only a
maintenance stipend of $250 and reimbursement for fuel and oil while on the job. She
stated that the Head Bay Constable receives dockage and reimbursement for fuel and
oil but no stipend She expressed the hope that the Town would "equalize" benefits for
the Fishers Island Bay Constables.
Mike Conroy was mentioned as a strong candidate given his diligence. He was also
recognized as the longest standing candidate in the pool, although he waited until the
last minute to reactivate his candidacy. A Committeeman asked about his work
schedule at the Water Company, Leslie said it was not an issue for the same reasons as
stated above. A Committeewoman mentioned that Mike is a really involved community
.
It~:'
~ -"'~'-
\. i
ciJ
.
member thereby making him attractive as a responsible candidate, but she expressed
concern about possible over commitment Leslie stated that each candidate knew the
time commitment involved with the Assistant Bay Constable job.
The Committee recognized Dick Hale as the "obvious choice" given his daily exposure
to the water and familiarity with boats, moorings, tackle, marks, etc...., and no actual
conflict of interest was identified A motion was made and approved to recommend
Dick Hale to the Town Board to fill the position being vacated by Bill Wall as Assistant
Bay Constable on Fishers Island in 1997.
A Committeeman suggested ranking the other two candidates. Several members
complained that this would be difficult because both Mr. Conroy and Mr. Horn are
good candidates. Leslie then suggested ranking them by order in which their interest
was expressed in the job -- Mr. Conroy's candidacy began on I2ICJ7/93.
It was noted by a Committeeman that Town compensation/payments/reimbursements
for both Fishers Island Bay Constables have been sporadic and should be regularized.
Leslie told the Committee that she did not yet write to the Town Board asking them to
consider and approve the September 1996 draft of the Fishers Island Harbor
Management Plan because she identified revisions made by the Town attorney that she
wanted to raise with the Committee. Specifically, Ms. Dowd revised the Plan to say
that transient mooring fees would be set by the Town and be collected and
deposited in the Town's General Fund (ref. "Covering Costs" and "Transient
Moorings"). It is unclear whether Ms. Dowd meant just mooring permit fees or
mooring permit fees AND user fees. Leslie recalled previous Committee discussion
where members had been adamant about user fees staying on the Island to reimburse
the permittee of those moorings for associated costs.
For purposes of review, the Committee agreed that there should be provision for
transient moorings in West Harbor in the east mooring field. These moorings (the
number of which to be determined by the Committee) would be permitted on an annual
basis. Money from the permits would go to the Town. The Committee would approve
a user fee as suggested by the permittee. The Committee has the option not to issue
permits to the same applicant the following year if fees charged for the transient
moorings grow too high, the moorings are determined unsafe, are badly administered
or for any other reasonable cause. Both Louisa and Steve Ridler believed that the
revised text was being misinterpreted or Ms. Dowd had misunderstood a comment
from state technical staff and this would not be a problem.
The Committee discussed the frequency of tackle inspections. A motion was
made and approved that mooring tackle should be visually inspected (as "far down" as
one could go) annually and that inspection by a diver should happen every two years.
The Committee discussed when channel and instructional marks should be
placed in the water for each boating season. A motion was made and approved that
all marks should be in the water by Memorial Day weekend It was noted that the
Head Bay Constable should mention this in his annual solicitation of bids to place and
maintain marks. Also, the Committee agreed that instructional marks should have a
white background with black lettering (also to be included in bid solicitation).
The Committee very briefly discussed channel configuration in West Harbor and
agreed that the main channel should be made more obvious than it is. The Committee
agreed to discuss the specifics of channel configuration at a spring meeting.
.
.
CJ)
Leslie mentioned that Town Bay Constable Don Dzenkowski, responsible for budget
requests for Fishers Island harbor needs, would oppose the Committee's request to the
Town Board to remove the piling In the West Harbor turning basin based on
Town liability in removing a fixed mark that indicates a hazard to navigation. A motion
was made and approved that the Committee request that the Town allow the removal (at
no charge) of the piling as the piling itself is a hazard to navigation (difficult for larger
vessels to turn around) and the rock it marks is currently "flush" with the sandy bottom
which is accurately marked on navigational charts as 7 feet. Although Louisa
expressed some doubt about the approval, at the Committee's request, Leslie agreed to
officially put the issue back before Louisa and the Town Board, despite Dzenkowski's
objection.
.
The Committee discussed Elby's revised one page Mooring Taekle
Components and Minimum Mooring Speeifieatlons (see attached). Elby
mentioned that there would be a second page with inspection information to accompany
the tackle legend and recommended specs. Several Committee members suggested
adding more small boat categories to the recommended mooring tackle specs (see
attachment for other comments). Committee members agreed to fax additional
comments and concerns to Elby for further revision in time for the Head Bay
Constable, Tom Doherty, to send the full mooring application packages out in January.
Elby displayed the proposed mooring ball stieker to be sent to applicants with
approved mooring permits each year. He explained the cost of ordering 150 adhesive
stickers for the 1997 season would be approximately $296 ($1.64 per sticker plus a
$50 set up charge). The Committee determined that each year, stickers should be a
different color aiding Bay Constables in patrols. The color chosen for 1997 was
green. The Committee asked Leslie to ask the Town to cover the costs of stickers.
Elby said he would not place the order until he knew how they were to be paid for.
The Committee identified several individuals known to dive and perform
mooring inspections. The Committee agreed to provide a list of these individuals
with the mooring application package to aid permittees in having their tackle inspected.
Carl Robinson in Mystic, Bob Welsh in Mystic, Bill Wall on Fishers, Paul Skinner on
Fishers, Mike Conroy on Fishers and Brian Faulkner on Fishers. Leslie agreed to
check with the IOD skippers for any of their contacts. Frank Bohlen agreed to check
with one of his contacts.
.
Steve Ridler outlined problem areas in the proposed Fishers Island Harbor
Management Plan as identified by state technical staff. His message to the
Committee was that the Plan could not be approved as originally drafted by the
Committee, but that the Committee would still be able to accomplish what it hopes to
accomplish in the Plan as being revised by the state and Town attorneys. Specific
comments included:
. Town Board possesses all authorities, the Committee can only make
recommendations
. When appointing committee members, the Town should draw members "to the
extent reasonable" from user groups listed in appendix C
. All "should" in the Plan will be changed to "shall" (so they need to be
authorized and enforceable)
. The designated management agent can possess no enforcement authority, all
must be imposed on Bay Constables (who then could delegate coordination but not
enforcement)
.
/:::'\
G2J
.
. The designated management agent can possess no enforcement authority, all
must be imposed on Bay Constables (who then could delegate coordination but not
enforcement)
. Recommended standards on vessel noise and speed cannot conflict with state
standards
. Language on aesthetics and property owner considerations should be relegated
to a general purpose statement at the beginning of the Plan
. Proposed residency requirements and fee structures for mooring applications
are unconstitutional as outlined (so are the Town's similar requirements), therefore the
Committee needs to define specific standards for permit approval and focus on the
process for obtaining permits as a way to manage applications.
. Fees for transient moorings go where?
. The language on using a vessel as an abode, anchoring, and live-aboards in
the east mooring field should define a period of duration. The Committee agreed to a 3
night limit within a period of 14 days
. The language on special uses of a private mooring should indicate that
permittees register their guests with the Bay Constable (who can delegate
coordination), not to the designated management agent
. The sanitation provision is difficult to enforce even though it's currently in the
Town Code
. Language on amended permits under "More About Moorings" should be
revised. The Committee agreed that any change to an existing permit will mean that the
application will be considered by the Committee as a new permit rather than an
amended one
. It should be very clear that mooring tackle specifications are recommended and
not enforceable, they should remain an appendix to the Plan
. In language regarding unsafe conditions, the Committee agreed that the Bay
Constable should recommend to the Committee that unsafe tackle be removed, and the
Committee should then ask the Town for permission to lift and remove the tackle.
Steve Ridler then discussed draft policies as they affect Fishers Island which will be
incorporated into the Southold LocaJ Waterfront Revitalization Plan. Steve will
recommend that policies specific to Fishers Island be outlined in Southold's LWRP
including protecting the community character of Fishers Island, promoting efficient
harbor operation in the waters off Fishers Island, addressing aquaculture on Fishers
Island and possibly commercial fishing, protecting Fishers Island water quality and
possibly dredge disposal adjacent to Fishers Island.
The meeting adjourned at 3:50pm
.
.
truW\ k>~l\ C ~tl
7/1<
Mooring Tackle Components for Single Point Moorings
LEGEND
I. Mushroom Anchor
2. Shackles c' 10.:1\ I"i"(a
3. Thimble
4. Pennant Minimum 10 feet
5. Float Buoy Minimum 24" Dia.
6 . Pick up Buoy
7. Lanyard with Snap Clip
Dr S y II (..Ed.
Water Line
.
IS
8. Chafe Straps ~
9. Chain 3:-4l::.;"k Minimum . eet
10. Chail).~ Minimum &.feet r 207
11 Zincl-tc,i?). 17> <l .
12. Float buoy,g,,~et (not to be use uring vessels)
13. Mooring lcfe~tification No 5" letter height .1
Yearly mooring sticker is affixed here 4
@
@---
G)
"
Top
Chain
@
.
BOllom
Pennant
Nylon 3 strand
Pair of 3/4"
Pair of 3/4"
Pair of I"
Pair 1 1/4"
C,,'c f'6\"e'f> Isl",,,,6
~~,door Q,""'M.tJee .
No stlDdards or Inspection requirements. bowever, can ensure vessel security under all possible conditions,
particularly ~re storms conditions wltb associated wind and wave bazards. As a result, tbe tll1l'n of
Soutbold, tbe F.L Bay Constable and tbe F.L Barbo~ssume no responsibility for personal
iDjury or property damage tbat may resnlt from the use of antouring tackle that either meets or exceeds
. tbe miDlmum standards set forth here. . '.LL .
. ~~~~
)D @> Q)
Re.co eVld d
c-::r Minimum Standards for single point mooring
Boat length Boat Weight Mushroom Bottom
Overall US tons Size Chain
}.~ 5c.d"\ebA'Vl8 .fOr 10..' Ilseye', ?
18. 31' Up to 6 tons 300 Ibs 5/8 1/1
15 - 41 6 to 10 tons 400 Ib 5/8 1/1
35 to 51' Up to 15 tons 5~:p 3/4 5/8
41 to 80' Up to 15 tons 60 s I 3/4
· Note: Double peMants to be used whe@er possible.
r"Vldc WI
All mooring tackle is subject t~in.fpection "I JI." I " is by the'ft.-:.
~c(euJ IV\ I"v'IDO{lVlffS ~
.
Need
1-VlV pCl~
LV! \.NJpectvv)
i V'\V(vV\{..\ P.GV\