Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-13.-2-8.2 JUDITH T.TERRY,TOWN CLERK RECEIPT 050091 Town of Southold Southold,New York 11971 Phone:516-765-1801 DATE 19 1 RECEIVED ` - "-/ $ y C FOR: ' -ccs", -moi 11 CASH MtHECK 1-t it TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Ado 27680 Suffolk County. New York 516 - 765.1801 j Southold, N. Y. 11971- 9.� L!'EIVED OF � Foi Judith T. Terry, 'row Clerk 1 Cash p Check, # � 3kj-LAA, TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD t�� 1 4folk County, New York 516 - 765.1801 1�9 291,17 - Southold, 91117eSouthold, N. Y. 11971— 193A. RECEIVED OF�� � i Ban 8 Odi For. , _} a e i Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Cash p Check 9 By, /(1/, /�/f�n� v . BMW • corrrpa►eeln t WWAW 2 for additional••rule••. ° 1 also wish to receive the • COMMINNINm 2,.and s•s b. following services (for an extra • Pdot"W lm*OW aedmu on the revem of this form so that we eon fee): rearm twee a you. Anedr INN feeh to the from of the m•llpime,or m ams bock If space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address doft:ria tNhalt. "4VJkb!lt*NWR 41eRNMand"on the mollga ae'below the VOWS mm* 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery • TM.RetuM#et•MtFee WIN provide you the signmus of the person delivered to' en of Consult postmaster for fee. '-Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number P 628 586 863 #-8atold Reese, Jr. 4b. service Type Re, 'o,e BrOB.. InC. ❑ Registered ❑ Insured 85!e Stmrise Highway - ] Certified ❑ COD Lyl�bipok, NY 11563 ❑ Express Mail ❑ Retum Receipt for 7. Date I 5. 1 B. Add 's Address(Only if requested and fee is paid) 8. SignalitsefA PSFtirm ,Ntrvambsr t990 eu.soFO:,M1-2erros DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT r , _ Isism f uwrw 2 for adla lonM souk.•. 1 also wish to receive the ss+MMa 11611116 aPAM ,cad re a b. folbw reban tO. kv yW...rete on ars revere of this form w that w•em fss): ssmc4 ffor an extra • • AsapRt9pr krm to On from of Urs Irmo) os,or on are bwk if sped 1. ❑Addressee's Address .dues fiat pOraik. • Wme�YN!r1n,H•eelpt tM m&bl o won mmbw • ttrlilNprh Foe wglproof tM p•r•on 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery to and;;a of dip Consuk master for fee. J. Article Addressedto: 4e. Article Number P 8 586 862 1 122 111 4b. Servk62a Type + -r1 a et) ❑ Reber}-., ❑ Insured i ❑ COD ❑ . all ❑ Return Receipt for / lzK/ - 11W 7. 0 1 X82 — ap re 111ddressee JI 8, 's Address(Only if raqueeted / -Is paid) gMl *VFloro maw Dilly gc RrmN RECEIPT 1 - 94 M O N 1 i : 1 9 B E N K I N Z L. E R A T T Y P . 0 i . Sue jF PE5 .11'11 41 F'I'1' •:] L, K' In l' 1l11<•4I ItIFU '.t9 1'1 :'•1• l]Itb:' r ^PAU hl N'11)HN IIV'I P..... i]' ,1 .n liana VAX hit' WI! :!742 uKsanwK VileTH KAHN December 12, 1994 Richard G. Ward, Chairm+)n Town of Southold Planni) q Board O 0 Town Hall D 53095 Main Road Southold New York 1197 W 13 W( Re: Hillcres' Estates Seca:i.on Two SOUTHOLD TOWN East Marson, New York SOUTHPLANNLD OWN RD $SIN #10 '•4-.1:1.-2-E�.•_ _...... _... _....._ ..,. Dear Chairman Ward: I spoke with Mel i;F-a :;Pi r() ci r your of f ice last week who informed me that the above matter had been placed onto the calendar of the Planning Board fc ;- t:hi>; evening, Monday, December 12, 1994. At that time, I advised 'is. Spire) that. I would not be available to attend the meeting on behalf of my client and accordingly, requested that the matter be adjourned. I wish to advise ttla Board that my clients are still actively pursuing the subdivisior appiic:at.ion. At great expense, wells were drilled on each of the propo.-:ed lotra and water samples taken from each lot were then testel. rest results, indicated that most of the lots met Department clf 1{ralth standards for approval. We understand the Department of Health is agreeable to approving the application, upon condition that those lots which have not met minimum drinking water srandards, he covenanted against improvement until such time as water tost resu.lto do meet minimum standards. We are presently finali;A nn such covenants and are seeking final approvals from the Depa tment of. Health. We are also present ;.y engaged in pursuing all other open items for our application bc'foro ti-it, Planning Board, including the preparation and submiss' on of n r:•ultural resources assessment. My clients have engaged the firm of. Freudenthal & Elkowitz, Consulting Group, Inc. who are pre:lsntly proceeding on our client's behalf on those matters. It is my belief th•'t cur applif;at.ian can be concluded within the next thirty days. ilt.houyh my clients have endured numerous difficulties and delays to this prajer:t, they, nevertheless, remain committed to pursuing this application and to completing same as Deo - 12 - S4 M O N 16 : 20 B E N K I N Z L E R A T T Y Page 2 Richard G. Ward, Chairmtn December 120 1994 expeditiously as possib:` e. we therefore respectfully request that the Board not close the application, but rather, grant an adjournment so as to afford us time to complete this application. Thanking you in advance for your courtesies in this matter. very truly Yours, Reese Bros. Dodge I ams .�PicE P/3 ,�1 S June 8, 1994 Mr. Richard G.Ward, Chairman Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Rd. Southold, New York Dear Mr. Ward: We refer to a letter dated April 29, 1994 written by Cramer, Voorhis & Associates and addressed to you where they stated on paragraph 4, line b7 And roads were prematurely constructed by the owner in 1988 While these roads might have been "Prematurely constructed" , they were certainly not constructed without the necessary approvals of the required authorities. Very truly yours , Harold Reese, Sr. HR:GM CC :Harold Reese , Jr. JUN 10 11994 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD (516) 593-5200 855 Sunrise Highway, Lynbrook, N.Y. 11563 p��(,P110N ,yiS� b New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau NEW VOW STATE $ Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188.0189 518-237-8643 Orin Lohman Commlaaloner June 10, 1994 Mr. Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICD Cramer, Voorhis & Associates 54 North Country Road Suite 2 Miller Pla4a, New York 11764 Dear Mr. Voorhis: Re: SEQRA Hillcrest Estates II Southold, Suffolk County 94PRI316 The office of Parke, Recreation and Hietoric Preservation (OPRHP) has received tha documentation you provided on your project. As the state agency respDneible for the coordination of the State's historic preservation programs, including the encouragement and assistance of local preservation efforts, we offer the following comments. Due to the project's proximity to known sites and the sensitive environmental characteristics of the project locale, it is our recommendation that unless substantial ground disturbance can be documented, an archeological survey is warranted. Attached is a list of qualified archeologists. Documentation of ground disturbance should include a description, illustration and photographs keyed to the project map. If you have any questions or comments on this matter, please contact our Bureau archeologist, Robert Ruhn, at (518) 237-8643, ext. 280. sin erely/, ,� �t.Gh w`v�r'l James Warren Program Analyst Field Services Bureau JPW:gc D LS lh IS ll IS W10516/060894 n 9 Attachments "A Word About Archeological Surveys" JW 17 1994 SOUTHOLD TOWN An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agoncy PLANNING BOARD `�'orinu.o on recvOnd P�oa, JI , PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. -, Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald t Fax(516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 24, 1994 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8.2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 23, 1994: WHEREAS, preliminary approval was granted to the major subdivision of Hillcrest Estates (Section One and Section Two) on June 15, 1982; and WHEREAS, the final plat for Hillcrest Estates Section One was approved on March 7, 1983; and WHEREAS, since 1986, miscellaneous information pertaining to the application for Section Two was submitted, reviewed and processed by the Planning Board, however, the final submission was never completed; and WHEREAS, the road improvements for both Sections were constructed at the same time, although a performance guarantee was not submitted for Section Two; and WHEREAS, since the applicant notified the Planning Board that he intended to aggressively pursue the pending subdivision application, a final hearing for Hillcrest Estates Section Two was set for October 19, 1992; and WHEREAS, the final hearing was held on October 19, 1992, and was held open to allow the applicant to obtain Health Department approval and to complete other outstanding requirements for final subdivision approval; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board agreed to numerous extensions requested by the applicant to allow the final hearing to remain open; and Page 2 Hillcrest Estates - Section 2 May 24, 1994 WHEREAS, the Planning Board, on March 28, 1994, closed the final hearing thereby establishing a final time frame of sixty-two (62) days to make a final determination on the final subdivision and notified the applicant that the final determination was scheduled for the Planning Board's May 23, 1994 meeting, and that all outstanding items must be completed by that date; and WHEREAS, the applicant was unable to submit all of the outstanding items needed by the Planning Board to grant final approval to the subdivision within the established time frame; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deny without prejudice the final application for Hillcrest Estates Section Two. The Planning Board's denial of the final application has caused the proposed subdivision to regress to the preliminary stage of subdivision review. If final approval is not reapplied for within six (6) months of the date of this resolution, the Planning Board shall revoke the preliminary plat approval, and the file shall be closed. The following items are required to reapply for final approval of Hillcrest Section Two: 1. As per the Planning Board's policy, a new application fee equal to one-half the major subdivision application fee must be submitted. The fee is to be calculated as follows: $500. plus $50. per acre or part thereof in the proposed subdivision, 2. Final maps (5 paper prints and 2 mylars) containing a stamp of Health Department approval must be submitted, 3. Verification from the Orient Fire District must be submitted stating that the water storage tanks that were installed in lieu of fire wells have been installed in a satisfactory manner. The location of the storage tanks must be indicated on the final subdivision map, 4. A Homeowners Association must be prepared for all areas of common ownership within the subdivision, A draft of the document must be submitted to the Town for review. Once the document is approved by the Town, it must be recorded prior to any endorsement of the final subdivision. S. A draft bond estimate of the work remaining to be completed must be submitted for review by the Planning Board and the Engineering Inspector. Once the bond estimate is approved by the Town, a performance guarantee will be required prior to any final approval of the subdivision. An inspection fee will also be required. The inspection fee will be calculated on the amount of the overall improvements for Section Two, not for the work included in the above mentioned bond estimate. j Page 3 Hillcrest Estates - Section 2 May 23, 1994 6. As noted in the Planning Board's letter dated May 10, 1994, the Planning Board determined that additional environmental documentation, as detailed in the report dated April 29, 1994, from the Board's consultant, was necessary in order to provide a means to assess the significance of the impacts outlined in the report. Once the additional documentation is submitted, the Planning Board will continue the SEQRA review. The SEQRA review may necessitate changes to the final map, the recording of a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions and the submission of additional information. You will be notified if any of these are required as the SEQRA review progresses. The information required by the Planning Board in the May 10th letter must be submitted within three (3) months from the date of this resolution to allow the SEQRA review, and any additional information and changes to the map required as a result of the review, to be completed within the six (6) month time frame. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, /J/ �1r "" �Y/ ,, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Harold Reese, Jr. Southold Town PlanninItard 6 Itay 23, 1994 Mr, Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I move that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Mr. Latham: Second the motion. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. McDonald: I abstain. Mr. Ward: One abstention, Mr. McDonald, note for the minutes. Approval of the Planning Board Minutes: Mr. Ward: Board to approve the March 28, 1994 minutes. Mr. McDonald: Moved. Mr. Edwards: I second it. Mr. Ward: Seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Paul Grosser: President of P.W. Grosser Consulting. I'd just like to update you as best I can on the water issues in regard to Hillcrest Estates. The Health Department samples have all been taken. We are awaiting the results. We've had some preliminary results that indicate about 8 of the lots do not meet drinking water standards. We'll be looking at the covenants as well as reviewing the lot layout, based on finalization of those results. We still haven't gotten the pesticide results back yet. Other than that I'd be willing to answer any questions at this point. Mr. Ward: At this point, what the Board is going to do, because we have to act tonight on the basis of subdivision, is that we're going to have a motion that's going to come up now that is going to actually bring you back to prelim. We'll Southold Town Planninvd 7 oy 23, 1994 still pursue expeditiously with you, from our end, all the reviews and that, but we are at a point where we just can't extend this any longer. By code and by law we have to, at this point, take an action. It doesn't mean that we are going to drop dead on this project, but it will mean that we will have to go back to the prelim and then move ahead with you through this process. So that's where we're at. I'd like to have the Board, at this point, present a resolution. Mr. McDonald: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to make a motion that WHEREAS, preliminary approval was granted to the major subdivision of Hillcrest Estates (Section One and Section Two) on June 15, 1982; and WHEREAS, the final plat for Hillcrest Estates Section One was approved on March 7, 1983; and WHEREAS, since 1986, miscellaneous information pertaining to the application for Section Two was submitted, reviewed and processed by the Planning Board, however, the final submission was never completed; and r WHEREAS, the road improvements for both Sections were constructed at the same time, although a performance guarantee was not submitted for Section Two; and WHEREAS, since the applicant notified the Planning Board that he intended to aggressively pursue the pending subdivision application, a final hearing for Hillcrest Estates Section Two was set for October 19, 1992; and WHEREAS, the final hearing was held on October 19, 1992, and was held open to allow the applicant to obtain Health Department approval and to complete other outstanding requirements for final subdivision approval; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board agreed to numerous extensions requested by the applicant to allow the final hearing to remain open; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board, on March 28, 1994, closed the final hearing thereby establishing a final time frame of sixty-two (62) days to make a final determination on the final subdivision and notified the applicant that the final determination was scheduled for the Planning Board's May 23, 1994 meeting, and that all outstanding items must be completed by that date; and WHEREAS, the applicant was unable to submit all of the outstanding items needed by the Planning Board to grant final approval to the subdivision within the established time frame; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deny without prejudice the final application for Hillcrest Estates Section Two. Southold Town Planninleard 8 Wy 23, 1994 The Planning Board's denial of the final application has caused the proposed subdivision to regress to the preliminary stage of subdivision review. If final approval is not reapplied for within six (6) months of the date of this resolution, the Planning Board shall revoke the preliminary plat approval, and the file shall be closed. The following items are required to reapply for final approval of Hillcrest Section Two: 1. As per the Planning Board's policy, a new application fee equal to one-half the major subdivision application fee must be submitted. The fee is to be calculated as follows: $500. plus $50. per acre or part thereof in the proposed subdivision. 2. Final maps (5 paper prints and 2 mylars) containing a stamp of Health Department approval must be submitted. 3. Verification from the Orient Fire District must be submitted stating that the water storage tanks that were installed in lieu of fire wells have been installed in a satisfactory manner. The location of the storage tanks must be indicated on the final subdivision map. 4. A Homeowners Association must be prepared for all areas of common ownership within the subdivision. A draft of the document must be submitted to the Town for review. Once the document is approved by the Town, it must be recorded prior to any endorsement of the final subdivision. 5. A draft bond estimate of the work remaining to be completed must be submitted for review by the Planning Board and the Engineering Inspector. Once the bond estimate is approved by the Town, a performance guarantee will be required prior to any final approval of the subdivision. An inspection fee will also be required. The inspection fee will be calculated on the amount of the overall improvements for Section Two, not for the work included in the above mentioned bond estimate. 6. As noted in the Planning Board's letter dated May 10, 1994, the Planning Board determined that additional environmental documentation, as detailed in the report dated April 29, 1994, from the Board's consultant, was necessary in order to provide a means to assess the significance of the impacts outlined in the report. Once the additional documentation is submitted, the Planning Board will continue the SEQRA review. The SEQRA review may necessitate changes to the final map, the recording of a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions and the submission of additional information. You will be notified if any of these are required as the SEQRA review progresses. The information Southold Town Plannit�ard 9 IVay 23, 1994 required by the Planning Board in the May 10th letter must be submitted within three (3) months from the date of this resolution to allow the SEQRA review, and any additional information and changes to the map required as a result of the review, to be completed within the six (6) month time frame. Mr. Ward: Is there a second? Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. We'll give you a copy of that and make it a little easier. Mr. Grosser: Thank you. Mr. Ward: Keep at it. OK, is there any other business for the formal meeting? Mr. McDonald: I move we close. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Martha A. Jones Secretary Richard G. Ward, Chairman �s Pa- BEN KINZLER ATTORNEY AT LAW 40 GUTTERMILL ROAD SUITE 200 GREAT NECK. NEW YORK 11021-5306 15161 482-8300 FAX 516-482-2749 DEBORAH BETH KAHN May 20, 1994 Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTN #1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Chairman: As the Board is undoubtedly aware, we are actively pursuing the above application. I look forward to meeting with the Board on Monday evening, May 23 , 1994 in order to report our progress. We are enclosing a copy of the proposed Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions which I trust will be satisfactory the Board. Should you require any changes, we will be most pleased to consider same. I wish to thank the Board for its courtesies and cooperation in this application. Very truly yours, BK:df BEN KINZLE pE EBOAAPn DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR HILLCREST ESTATES This declaration made the day of 19 by HAROLD REESE, SR. having his office at 855 Sunrise Highway, Lynbrook, New York (hereinafter referred to as "Reese") W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Reese is the owner in fee simple of certain premises in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated on a certain map entitled, "Hillcrest Estates Section II" a subdivision situate at East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, filed in the Office of the Clerk of Suffolk County on Map Number on the day of 19 and WHEREAS, said Reese is improving the aforedescribed premises as a planned residential community and contemplates that lots in said residential community are to be conveyed to individual purchasers; and WHEREAS, Reese is desirous of placing certain restrictions upon said premises which shall be binding upon all purchasers and mortgagees of individual lots, their heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, or others successors in interest; NOW, THEREFORE, Reese declares that the aforesaid land is held and shall be conveyed subject to the following covenants and restrictions which shall run with the land and shall continue in perpetuity. HOME OWNERS AGREEMENT 1. Construction Requirements a) Type of Building No building shall be erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain other than one detached single family dwelling not to exceed two and one-half (2 1/2) stories in height and a private garage for not more than three (3) cars, or two (2) cars and a boat and boat trailer. b) Accessory Building No carport or other accessory building of any kind may be erected except: 1) a detached garage and 2) an accessory building used in conjunction with a swimming pool. c) Swimming Pool A private in-ground swimming pool may be constructed on any lot provided it is situate in the rear yard only and provided further that no portion of any such pool or its appurtenances shall be closer to the rear or side lot lines than thirty (30) feet. In no instance shall the rear yard be considered the area between the street and building lines. d) Dwelling Square Footage Requirements No dwelling shall be permitted on any lot unless the ground floor area of the main structure, exclusive of one-story open porches and garages, shall be not less than 1500 square feet. If the living area is on more than one floor, the total living area shall be not less than 1800 square feet. e) Approval of Construction Plans All plans for the construction of any building and/or structure and the siting and facing upon the plot must be presented to and approved in writing by Reese, its successors or assigns, prior to the start of any construction. Such approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, shall be based on the judgment of Reese as to whether the proposed structure will be consistent with, and will not detract from the esthetic character of the Reese community. All exterior construction, painting and grading shall be completed within one (1) year after commencement of construction. f) Building Modifications All permitted accessory buildings and additions or other modifications thereto, and any modification of the initial residential building, including any breezeway or other structure connecting an addition to the main building, shall conform in architecture, material and color to such dwelling. Any attached addition to the initial residential dwelling shall not project more than five (5) feet beyond the front wall of the dwelling or structure as originally approved. 2. Restriction on Division and Use of Lots No lot shall be divided and conveyed as two or more separate parcels. Nor shall more than one (1) dwelling house be located on any lot. 3 . Residential Use of Lots No lot shall be used except for residential purposes. 4 . Signs No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot except the name of the resident owner without the written consent of Reese, its successors or assigns. 5. Animals No animals, livestock or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on any lot, except that of dogs, cats or other household pets may be kept provided that they are not kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purpose. 6. Trailers, Tents and Shacks No trailer, tent, shack or other such structure shall be located, erected or used on any lot temporarily or permanently. 7 . Annoying Activities No noxious or offensive activities shall be carried on upon any lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or may become an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. S. Trash Garbage or rubbish shall not be dumped or allowed to remain on any lot. All garbage to be collected must be contained in a closed receptacle, placed inconspicuously outside the dwelling for collection. 9 . Clothesline Clotheslines and laundry poles must be located in the rear yard and so placed and so screened so as not to be visible from the street upon which the premises front or from other adjoining property. 10. Fences Fences, whether fabricated or growing, shall not exceed four (4) feet in height; cyclone and chain link fences are not permitted, except insofar as same may be required in the installation of a swimming pool. 11. Boats and Boat Trailers No boat or boat trailers shall be placed on any lot unless in a garage or authorized accessory building. 12 . Road Drainage and Park Facilities (a) Construction of Road and Drainage Facilities Reese shall install road and drainage improvements pursuant to specifications approved by the Town of Southold. No title to drainage facilities or land in any such road opened or laid out by Reese is intended to be conveyed to purchasers of any lots and Reese reserves to itself the fee to drainage areas and of all land lying in the bed of any and all such roads. (b) Park Area Reese has set aside, as indicated on the subdivision map, a park area for the use of the owners of lots and their guests and invitees. No fires or fire pits shall be permitted in the Park Area unless approved by Reese , its successors and assigns. (c) Road Easements; Use of Park All owners of lots, their guests and invitees, are hereby granted an easement for the purpose of ingress and egress in common with others, at their own risk, over the roads of Reese, shown on said map. All owners of lots are hereby granted the right to use, in common with others, at their own risk, the park area. The use of the roads and park ares shall be subject to reasonable regulations from time to time promulgated by Reese or by an association of property owners succeeding to the rights of Reese. (d) Upkeep of Roads Drainage and Park Area Each lot owner shall be responsible for one-fifty fourth (1/54) of the real estate taxes attributable to the road, drainage and park areas. All decisions as to the snowplowing, upkeep, and maintenance of the roads, drainage and park areas, including decisions as to the extent and cost of any repairs therefor, shall be in the exclusive discretion of Reese, or its successors in interest, or an association of property owners as hereinafter provided. (e) Surface Water Drainage System Reese intends to utilize natural drainage areas within the subdivision. In order to insure that such drainage areas shall function properly, the following covenants and restrictions are hereby imposed. 1. No trees, shrubs, planting or other vegetation shall be planted or maintained in or about the drainage areas without the written consent of Reese, or its successors or assigns, and the Planning Board of the Town of Southold. 2 . No sand, gravel, loam or other material shall be deposited in the drainage areas, nor shall any material be removed therefrom without the written consent of Reese, or it successors or assigns, and the Planning Board of the Town of Southold. 3 . No fences or other structures shall be placed or maintained in or about the drainage areas without the consent of Reese or its successors or assigns, and the Planning Board of the Town of Southold. 4 . Reese, or its successors and assign, shall have the right to enter upon the drainage areas in order to insure that such areas are properly functioning for surface water drainage purposes. (f) Payment of Contributions by lot Owners While Reese holds title to the road, drainage and park areas, it will pay the taxes and expenses mentioned in paragraph (d) above, and will submit bills to the individual lot owners for their respective contributions. Such bills will be paid in full to Reese by the then present low owners within thirty (30) days after said bills have been mailed. In the event that said bill is not paid when due, the same shall become and remain a lien upon the premises of said owner (s) until paid, and Reese, its successors or assigns, shall have the right to collect same and to enforce the lien thereof by any means authorized by law. (g) Property Owner' s Association 1. After one-third (1/3) of the lots have been conveyed by Reese, said Reese, at its cost and expense, shall form, organize and transfer title to the road, drainage and park areas to the property owners' association, to be known as the Hillcrest Estates-II Property Owners' Association. 2 . After conveyance is made to the Property Owners' Association pursuant to subdivision 1 above, then: (a) All costs and expenses associated with the road, drainage and park areas shall thereafter be borne entirely by the Property Owner' s Association; (b) The owners of all lots purchased in Hillcrest Estates shall be members of the Property Owners' Association; (c) Each member of the Property owners' Association shall be liable, on a per lot basis, for a share of the cost and expenses of the Property Owners ' Association; (d) Each member agrees to comply with the regulations for the use of the park, drainage and road facilities enacted by the Property Owner' s Association. A two-thirds (2/3) vote shall be required for the enactment of each such regulation; (e) Title to the road, drainage and park areas shall be held in perpetuity by the Property Owner' s Association; (f) Each lot owner shall have one vote for each lot owned, whether improved or unimproved; (g) Reese, its successors or assign, including a property owners' association, covenants and agrees that the Town of Southold, it subdivisions and agencies, shall be held harmless from any and all liability in connection with the construction and maintenance of the park, drainage and road areas. A liability insurance policy shall be secured by Reese, it successors or assigns, including a property owner' s association, in the sum of one million ($1, 000, 000. 00) dollars in which the owner of the park, drainage and road areas and the Town of Southold, its subdivisions and agencies, shall be named insureds. (i) Utility Easements An easement over, along, or under the roads on said map and over any other area necessary is hereby expressly reserved for the erection and maintenance of poles and wires and conduits and of all proper and necessary attachments for electric power and telephone service, and for the construction of maintenance of any utility easements; provided, however, that the said easements shall be over areas designated by municipal or public utility authorities. 13 . Invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. 14 . Enforcement shall be by proceedings at law or in equity brought by Reese, it successors and assigns, or by the owner of any lot against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant or restriction, either to restrain violation or to recover damages or both. 15. Failure by Reese, it successors and assigns, or of any owner to enforce all of the provisions herein shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. 16. All of the foregoing restrictions are intended to cover only the plots shown on the map of Hillcrest Estates-II and are not extended to any other property now or to be owned by Reese. 17 . These covenants and restrictions shall run with the land and continue in perpetuity. By: Harold Reese, Sr. STATE OF NEW YORK) ) ss. . COUNTY OF NASSAU ) Harold Reese, Sr. , being duly sworn, states as follows: I am the herein, and have read the foregoing instrument and know the contents thereof to be true to my own knowledge, with the exception of those matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and as to those matter, I believe them to be true. Harold Reese, Sr. Sworn to before me this day of 1994 *COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING STEPHEN M. JONES, A.I.C.P. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING May 5, 1994 Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Subdivision Map of Hill Crest Estates - Section 2 N/s/o Main Road, (N.Y.S. Rte. 25), 590.86 feet e/o Browns Hill Road, Orient, New York. Dear Mr. Ward: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on May 4, 1994, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Subdivision Map of Hill Crest Estates, Section 2" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. Very truly yours, Stephen M. Jones Director of Planning byt^ rank Dowling rincipal Planner Subdivision R iew Division File: S-SD-83-04.1 FD:mb D N � N 0 Attachment cc: Edward Romaine, County Clerk MAY 10 1994 P�IANNING BOARD H. LEE DENNISON BUILDING ■ VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY ■ HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11789 ■ 1516) 853-5192 FAX (516) 653-4044 File No. S-SD-83-04.1 Resolution No. ZSR-94-43 of Suffolk County Planning Commission Pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on April 1, 1994, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Subdivision Map of Hill Crest Estates - Section 2" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting premises located on the n/s/o Main Road, (N.Y.S. Rte. 25) , 590.86 feet e/o Browns Hill Road, Orient, in the Town of Southold, New York, and WHEREAS, said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its meeting on May 4, 1994, and WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to disapprove said referral, Be It Therefore RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby accepts the report of its staff, Be It Further RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is disapproved for the following reasons: In accordance with Commission policy on a subdivision with a lot or lots whose area does not meet the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning ordinance the recommendation is for DISAPPROVAL for the following reasons: Creation of a subdivision with substandard lots, that is, lots whose areas are less than the minimum required by the zoning classification of the property, constitutes an overintensification of land use. Such action could establish a precedent for future subdivision of this kind which would essentially be a circumvention of the Town Board's action taken over the past years to upzone the area in order to bring it more into conformity with modern lot area and planning standards and to limit density. Motion by: Commissioner Larsen Seconded by: Commissioner Shepard Commission Vote: 13 Present - Yeas 12 Nays 0 Abstentions 1 Commissioner Cichanowicz Dated May 4, 1994 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission Southold Town Plannin*ard 4 May 094 BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from May 15, 1994 to November 15, 1994. Conditional sketch approval was granted on November 15, 1993. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. *#####1ff*#**###ff#««««**1111111#«* Mr. Ward: Peconic Homes - This minor subdivision is for 2 lots on 45.9741 acres located on the south side of Sound Ave.; 1917 feet east of Farmveu Road in Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-121-3-7.1. What's the pleasure of the Board? Mr. McDonald: I'd like to make a motion that BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from April 4, 1994 to October 4, 1994. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. *#***###***«***#*#««««««*111111**** MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS, LOT LINE CHANGES, SET OFF APPLICATIONS - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Determinations: Mr. Ward: Hillcrest Estates - Section 2 - This major subdivision is for 20 lots on 22.9 acres located in Orient. SCTM# 1000-13-2-8.5. What's the pleasure of the Board? Mr. McDonald: Would you like to address the Board? Ben Kinzler: It's my understanding that there are some environmental issues that the Board wishes to address and we'd be certainly interested in hearing from the Board initially. Mr. Ward: We're looking to take lead agency tonight. We have a determination with Southold Town Planning&rd 5 May *94 the Suffolk County Planning Commissions report. Why don't we go through that and if you have any questions at the end, you could address it. Mr. McDonald: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to make a motion that BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this unlisted action. Mr. Orlowski: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. McDonald: I make a second motion that WHEREAS, the Planning Board and the Planning Board's environmental consultant have reviewed the proposed subdivision in accordance with the State Environmental Quality Review Act; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the site contains unique and valuable environmental features including escarpments and steep slope topography, wooded slopes adjacent to Long Island Sound, visual resources, a diversity of soil types with some constraints, and a high cultural resource sensitivity; and WHEREAS, the above mentioned features require careful consideration by the Planning Board as lead agency in review of the proposed project; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board require that additional environmental documentation, as detailed in the report dated April 29, 1994 from Charles J. Voorhis, be prepared in order to provide a means to assess the significance of these impacts. The Planning Board, by closing the final hearing on March 28, 1994, established a time frame of sixty-two (62) days to make a final determination on the final subdivision. The final determination has been scheduled for the Planning Board's May 23, 1994 public meeting. Therefore, the outstanding items as listed in the Board's February 3, 1994 correspondence, must be completed by that date. Mr. Orlowski: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Southold Town Planninlard 6 May *94 Mr. McDonald: I'd like to make a third resolution BE IT RESOLVED to override the May 5, 1994 Suffolk County Planning Commission report, as per Section 100-32 B, (2) of the Zoning Code, the bulk and parking requirements set forth for the R-40 district apply to all lots shown on the major subdivision maps upon which the Planning Board held a hearing for preliminary map approval prior to May 20, 1983. Preliminary approval was granted to Hillcrest Estates Section Two prior to May 20, 1983. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. So we're looking for a further review of the items that Cramer and Voorhis have identified as potential issues, if you could address those and get those back to us. Mr. Kinzler: Could we get a copy of that? Mr. Ward: Yes. Mr. Kinzler: I wanted to let the Board know, if it's of interest, a couple of things. Number one, I know that the firewells have been an ongoing issue. I don't want you to feel that they've been ignored. Casola had initiated the wells and ran into some problems with the fine soil and I understand that they have just about completed, or have completed the installation of the wells. I hope to be able to report to you very quickly that has been completed. I know it's been a concern. All the wells have been installed on each lot and samples have been taken by the Board of Health. I understand on one lot they couldn't draw a sufficient quantity of water to take a test, but they have taken all the other lots and they're supposed to have been due a couple of days ago, we haven't yet gotten it. We expect it momentarily. Hopefully everything will be completed and finalized by your May 23rd date. Mr. Latham: You mentioned wells. Did you mean tanks or wells? Mr. Kinzler: We've drilled wells on each... Mr. Latham: I meant firewells. Mr. Kinzler: As I understood it, and I'm not sure if you were here at the last meeting, when Casola had dug the wells, he couldn't draw sufficient water, and so they got special permission from the fire district to install the wells. Mr. Latham: Yeah, I was confused about that. Southold Town Planning&rd 7 May 0 94 Mr. Ward: While you're up here, on another subject on Grandview, you're also involved in that particular subdivision? Mr. Kinzler: I'm not personally involved in Grandview, but if there is an issue with Grandview I'd be more than happy to address it with the client. Mr. Ward: We had a question. We hear that there are going to be tanks placed in for that for fire protection as well, instead of wells. The Planning Board has no idea, the Town hasn't been advised, as to where they're proposed to go. We haven't had any communication from the applicant or the fire district. Harold Reese: This was arranged with the Fire Commissioner and if he's neglected to advise the Board, I'll make sure you have it. Mr. Ward: OK Mr. Reese: Casola did meet with the Fire Commissioner, both sides Grandview and Hillcrest, to arrange for the tanks. Mr. Ward: Well the Town doesn't know anything about it. Mr. McDonald: Keep in mind that the fire commissioner's advise us. We decide about the firewells and the tanks. We have no reason to doubt anything that they've ever done, but the decision... Mr. Kinzler: We were not aware of that and if what you're saying is that Casola and the Fire Commissioner have preempted your authority, it was not intentional. Mr. McDonald: No, there' s no real reason to disagree with them. They know what they're doing. Mr. Kinzler: No, but our ignoring you was not intentional. Mr. Latham: Are they putting tanks down at Grandview, not wells? Mr. Reese: Tanks. Mr. Ward: Do they have make-up water for these tanks? Mr. Reese: I don't understand the question. Mr. Ward: Are they putting in a small well that would make up water for these tanks or is it something... Mr. Reese: My understanding, and I could be wrong about this, that the fire department is responsible for filling the tanks if it is used. That was my understanding and I could be wrong in that regard. Southold Town Planning&rd 8 May 994 Mr. Kinzler: I know that Casola had the same problem with the other wells as well, they didn't draw sufficient water. Mr. Ward: OK, we appreciate it. We're trying to reach the district also. wwwwwwwwwww+wwwwwwrrr«««««rr«wwwwww APPROVAL OF PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Mr. Wa : Board to approve the November 15, 1993 minutes. Mr. Orlows So moved. Mr. McDonald: Second. Mr. Ward: Movednd seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? tion carried. r««www«www�rrrr««wwwwwwwwwwwww�w««r Mr. Ward: Also tonight we hav before us a proposed legislation in relation to Accessory Buildings and Structur s. I think it's in order that we have a resolution to pass on our report to the Town Board- Mr. McDonald: I make a motion tha4 we send this report to the Town Board. Mr. Orlowski: Second. Mr. Ward: All in favor? ; Mr. Ward: Opposed? Moon carried. Any furth�r business to come before the Board? Ms. Scopaz? Ms. Scopaz: No. Mr. Ward: Member of the Board? Anybody in the pubtic, while we're in the official public meeting, as e're going to be going into a worksess(ion following this, if you have anything th you'd like to discuss, you're welcome to`�tay for that. If not... Mr. Latham: 1 ove we adjourn. Mr. Orlows : So moved. Mr. Ward: Is there a second? PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS > Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald 3 Fax (516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 10, 1994 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE : Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 9, 1994 : Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this unlisted action. WHEREAS, the Planning Board and the Planning Board' s environmental consultant have reviewed the proposed subdivision in accordance with the State Environmental Quality Review Act; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the site contains unique and valuable environmental features including escarpments and steep slope topography, wooded slopes adjacent to Long Island Sound, visual resources, a diversity of soil, types with some constraints, and a high cultural resource sensitivity; and WHEREAS, the above mentioned features require careful consideration by the Planning Board as lead agency in review of the proposed project; Hillcrest Estates, Section Two May 10, 1994 Page 2 be it therefore, RESOLVED that the Planning Board require that additional environmental documentation, as detailed in the report dated April 29 , 1994 from Charles J. Voorhis, be prepared in order to provide a means to assess the significance of these impacts . Be it further RESOLVED to override the May 5, 1994 Suffolk County Planning Commission report. As per Section 100-32 B. (2) of the Zoning Code, the bulk and parking requirements set forth for the R-40 District apply to all lots shown on major subdivision maps upon which the Planning Board held a hearing for preliminary map approval prior to May 20, 1983 . Preliminary approval was granted to Hillcrest Estates, Section Two prior to May 20, 1983 . The Planning Board, by closing the final hearing on March 28, 1994, established a time frame of sixty-two ( 62 ) days to make a final determination on the final subdivision. The final determination has been scheduled for the Planning Board' s May 23, 1994 public meeting. Therefore, the outstanding items, as listed in the Board' s February 3, 1994 correspondence, must be completed by that date. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, VaWj Richard G. Ward -InS Chairman enc . cc: Harold Reese, Jr. Suffolk County Planning Commission Frank Cichanowicz CRAMER, V RH 1ATES ENVIRONMEN / \�!G CONSULTANTS 5 April 29, 1994 Mr. Richard Is.Ward, Chairman Southold Plattnt'ng Board Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N-1' 1191 D Re: Review of EAF Hillcrest Estates . Section 2 SCTM No. 1000.13-2-8.2 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOAS Dear Mr. pWeard: ary referenced e your reuest,we have completed a prefimbL review of protj'hect. Tasks and completed activities are identified as followsthe above 1. Revi&,,Plat I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2 Prepmr Part II LEAF The Part lI LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Envk nnserttal and Plar Lng Conrideiadons The site consists of 22.90 acres of land, located on each side of Heath Drive,north of Hillcrest Drive,with 533 feet of frontage on Lonj$Island Sound. The project has a lengthy history, wbereby, Section 1 of the subdivision was reviewed and approved pnor ro 1988. The subject Section 2 received preliminary approval at that time. Subsequent to approval, Section 1 was built, and without proper approvals, the developper constructed the roads for Section 2. Review of the Town files fnd5 no prior 3MRA Determination of Significance for Section 2. Pence, the Town is obligated to consider the environmental implications of the approval of Hillcrest Estatcs, Section 2 at this time. The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area leave been consulted. The following summarizes the significant environmental considerations regarding the site. Over2ll, the northern part of the site is wooded in first growth woods including primarily black locust, black cherry and maple species. The canopy is sparse m many areas, and this in connection with clearing for roads and and improvements has allowed segnt�,cant light penetration giving rise to a thick understory of briars and rola rugosa. I hes'Duthernpart of the site, primarily south of Sound View Drive, consists of overgrown field with herbaceous groundcover and pioneer species. The northern pan of the site includes steep slope areas associated with the harbor Hills Iermittal moraine. Vere are three lots prm.,oscd along the Sound front area 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 T .3 - .� _ ._ _ _ .... ,3 , .a 1 o ._. ;A _. .� .,, r , 0 T r 0 T N L, 1.1 t - Hillcrest Estates,orient Long FAF Review (Lots 47, 48 and 49). The proposed subdivision map depicts the "Approximate Top of Bluff', as wells as the 'limit of Coastal Erosion Hazard Area". The three lots extend from Hill Crest Drive to the northroperty line and include bluff as well as Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas within their pboundanes. Part of the building envelopes for Lots 41 and 48 are within Coastal Erosion Hazard Area boundaries. Along the Sound, the toe of the slope has been undermined causing destabilization of the lower part of the bluff The slope rises at a rate of 40.60 percent on the west side of the slope, to 60-80 percent on the east side of the slope. The slope in these areas is relatively stable as a result of vegetation and subsoils. The slope rises to a ridge with a high elevation of 107.1 feet on the west side of the Sound front land, that decreases 9n a evation to approximate)y 70 feet to the east With the exception of a signifi t -- ~ mound in the vicinity of the high elevation on the west side of this area, the slopes are less severe in this area, in the range of 5.15 percent with localised slopes of 20-30 percent. Additional areas with slopes in the range of 20-30 percent are present in several of the lots proposed south of Hill Crest Drive. Slopes pose a sig�_"cant constraint to site 6eevelopment Use of Lots 47, 48 and 49 must be carefully regulated in ord.r to avoid significant erosion of the bluff. Slopes on Lots 45 and 46 must also be corsidered in order to avoid erosion and sedimentation within the subdivision during,construction and site use. The site consists ofsix soil types noted as follows: Sal;include Beach and Ewarpmew on the northern 20 perceat of site, Moutauk F'mc Sandy Loa=and Plymouth Loamy Sand oa the north central 40 percent of the site. Scio S;k I,cam on the south central 25 percent of the site. Haven loam oa the south 15 peroczt of the aitc. Montzxik Fine Sandy Loam and Scio Silt Loam have poor drainage qualities and may pose a constraint to the site. The Escarpment soils are subject to erosion and aLo pose a constraint to site use. Aerial photography from prior to 1975 and included in the so:1 survey, indicates that the southern 30 percent of the site was used for agricultural purposes. As noted previously, the site lies at a high elevation of approximately 70 to 107 feet, with average central elevations of 30 to 40 feet. The depth to groundwater beneath the site is 1 to 2 feet, therefore, the depth groundwater beneath the north part of the site is 69 to 106 feet, and beneath the southart of the site is 68 to 105 feet. The site is within Groundwater Management Zone lV (unique water regime with special problems), and is north of the northern border of the Water Budget Area as depicted on the SCDHS Article 7 Map, and Figure 7-1 of the North Fork Water Supply Study. Nitrate and thepesticide aldicarb are the primary groundwater contaminants of concern on the North fork. The area including tie subject site was identified as having positive samples for aldicarb in the range of 3-5 to 13.9 in Figure 3-3 of the "Report on the Occurrence and Movement of Agricultural Chemicals in Groundwater: North Fork of Suffolk County' (SCDHS, 1982). This repot made reference to nitrate contamination mapping✓ contained in an earlier water supply study, that identified the area beneath the south part of the subject site as bamig nitram 8 mgJl. The "North Fork Water Supply PL•,n" (SCDHS, 1983),showed similar areas of elevated nitrate but did not indicate elevated aldicarb bbeneath the subject site. There are no public water maim in the arta of the site. P.ascd on Meld CRAMER, VCN RHt $YK, SOCIATES Page tof6 ENVIRONMENT All:YpiANN��lG CONSULTANTS Hillcrest EaAWA,orient Long PAP Review inspection, test wells are being installed on site to determine underlying groundwater qualit7r and suitability for on site water supply. Water and sanitary dish systems must tie approved by Suffolk County Department of Health Semces. The site is zoned for one acre_residential development, and the proposed developmentplaoprovides square 20 lots with sizes of 40,M feet or more consistent with z ming The surrounding lands are similarly zoned and Hillcrest Estates,Section 1 (south and west) is an approved plan that is in the beginning stases of development. Single family residences are present on lands east of the site. Tne proposed project will generate traffic commensurate with 20 sin4le family units, averaging appratimately 200 trips per day, with 20 peak hour trips. This trip generation is not expected to cause a significant burden on local. transportation systems though delays in cxo;aing through lanes may occur due to lack of gaps during summer months with periods or high ferry traffic volume. The site is a significant visual resource with exceptional views particularly during winter months. From Long Island Sound, the site appears fairly unique with a low bluff and wooded slope rising from the shorefront. Retention of vegetation and preservation of slope areas will minimize the visual alteration of the landscape. The Notch Fork has abundant cultural resources with historic structures and numerous documented arcbaeolocal sites. The Suffolk County Archaeological Association identified the North ?ork generally as "Areas of Intensive Aborzgwal Habitation" in their 1979 report on the County s cultural resource& Additional research was conducted regarding the cultural sensitivity of the site. The New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (N`YS/OPRHP) identaaes the site as a "Zone of Multiple Site Listings", indicating more than one documented archaeological site within the area 'A-he Suffolk County site listing includes site #747 (Orient Flaking Station/Hallmk Site) within approximately one male south of the site, and site ,71749 Beaches Sound/Heath Farm) within approa,imately one mile west of the site. In addition, site 4744 (Five Acre Indian Village/Oyster Pond) lies within approximately 1.5 miles southwest of the site. Zas,^d on these documented sites, archaeological sensitivity'policy of NYS/OPRHP would indicate the need for a Stage I Cultural Resources assessment. It is noted that,in terms of site sensitivity due to environmental resources, the site is highlff sensive . The location of the site proximate to Long Island Sound with tidal we ands and small freshwater ponds throughout the area ru«hiu a mile of the site would have provided an abundance of water and food resources to abori cultures. In additi an, published literature suggests that areas xitliln proximity to eroded steep morainal slopes have increased sensitivity due to the availability of quartz pebbles for toolmaking and arrow points. in summary, the fc:llo Ning site features indicatc a high cultural resource sensitivity: a. The North Fork 3n geccral is considered as ,ta of intensive abor2}nO habitation. b. There are two (2)documcrted pre-Wacric sitas+:-ithin one mile of the saibjcct Rite. c Tharc arc both freshwater and tidal wctlanw in preacic:i y to t`uf'f subjca site. d There is an abunda ncr of raw material for flaking ing material. As a result, the subject site is e,•cyected to have a taitth cinniral rrsouree sensitivity. Therefore, in accordance with State cultural resoura;s policy, eovironsiental factor•,,, and cite respousibiiiry or review agencies to icientuy r,reversible and in.ctri evable CRAMER, VOORHIS &rgSSOCIATES ?RW 3016 ENViRONMEN7AL_AND`PIANNc`JG CONSutTANTS \''. liilkreat Eatatea,orient Long E"Review cultural resources in accord with review guidelines of the State Environmental Qualify Review Act, additional research concerning the archaeological resources of the site is warranted. 4. Reconunendations • The site contains unique and valuable environmental features in the form of escarlirments and steep slope topography,Et•ooded slopes adjacent Lastg island Sound, a diversity of soil types with some consnamu,visual resources and a high cultural resow tx sensitivity. These features require careful consideration by the Planning Board as lead agency in review of the project. The subject site has pre 3itninary Rp val, and roads were prematurely constructed by e owner in 1988. Heealalth rtment approvals are proceeding on individual lots consistent with the inary layout, and the applicant has been required to complete additional requirements. At this time, in order tove appropriate consideration to the environmental resotn.ces of the site, adstional information concerning steep slopes, site disturbannce and cultural resources is recommended prior to final approval. Ibis ;;consistent with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEO A) which rewur es detenni.amg the environmental significance of an action dor to final decision and projed:t implementation. Consideration of mitigation and sensitivity of resources at this stage of review will allow the Planning Board to reach an appropriate detennrnation of sipificance through issuance of a SEQRA Declaration Towards this end, the following requirements are suggested: 1) An area on the north side of the subject property should be established,where no disturbance to soils and vegetation• +illbe permitted. This is r~ecessary in order to avoid destabilization of steep slope areas above unstable bluff areas, which could result in slumping and erosion on the face of the slope. It is recommended that the non-disturbance area be easily mapped and marked in the field, and that it be landward of the majority of areas with slopes in excess of 50 percent at the crest of the ridge. The following language is suggested. "There shall bean area establi&"a on", 47, 48 and 49(northern three lads,map of Young&Yoaq revised Mar.21, DsA) of the l lillueat Eetara,Section 2 3ubZ,4sio4 whereby there w H be no di:Awbacce of the soils or vegetation,Kith tae excep°aoa of minor foot trails and limited clearing for well plaeement(if aomsm.,y). For Etch 47 and 4J3 this area shall be uorth of a line 130 nonN of and parallel to the south property line. For Lot 49, this area shall be north of.i,Rue lro cortb of anti parallel to the south property Rine.' It is recommended that this requirement be placed directly cn the subdivision map, and f.Jed as a covenant on the overwIl subdivision as lvell as each individual building lot. 2) It is recommended that yadingsite plans b,� r�,-quired for lots with steep siopesprior to avprovai of the anal sutxiivis.on. The grading, sits; piani or Lois 47, 48 and ,O should show coaformactce with the above. nn.ed covenant CRAMER, VQ;M—tS, 8"S'SOCIATES Page 4ot6 ENVIRONMENT t� 41 ![a' kANNiNC CGNSULTANTS Hillcrest Pstatea,Orient Long EAP Review and should depict cut and fall areas,retaining walls, driveway and sanitary system adtn�, slopes of l3 or less, g�rnq south from the ridge, and site stabilizattion through landscaping AIl runoff from roofs and driveways should be directed to dry wells on site in order to minimize erosion potential. Due to the diminished building envelops for Lots 47 and 48, a front yard variance may be contemplated for these lots. If the Planning Board is in agreement with this measure to achieve a greater setback from steep slope areas, the matter could be referred to the Board of Appeals with Planning Board support. It is recommended that grading site plans beprepared for Lots 4S and 46 in order to establish a means of development of these two sites in a manner that will prevent erosion. Building permits should be consistent with the grading and landscaping concept, and will be required in appropriate detail at the time of Building Permit review. 3) An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be prepared for development of Lots 4$ through 49. The plan should provide a step by step account of development of these sites in a manner that will prevent erosion. Sequence of clearing, pmbbing, stripping and stockpile of topsoil, topsoil stabilization and location, excavations and subsoil stockpile areas, site construction and re-stabilization should be detailed. Site construction must adhere to erosion control standards to be given final consideration at the time of Building Permit review. 4) A Stage I Cultural Resources Assessment (CRA) should be prepared for the site. The study should employ standard archaeological methods. Site sensitivity has been documented, however,background literature should be cited to identify archaeologic potential. Systematic subsurface testiu&should be conducted on the subject site. 'Be following minimum standards for subsurface testing are recommended: a. A minimum 20x40 meter grid should be used for the 22.9 acre site. b. A stratigrapl is tog should be prepared for A test holm d. Recovered cultural materW should be saved acrd property dowmeated. A list of qualified arcbaeolo is can be provided if necessary, or the applicant may call the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic c-reservation for additional information if necessary. The Stage I report sbould be submitted to the Town prior to Final approval in order to assess the potential impact of the project on irreplaceable and irretrievable cultural resources, and/or devise mitigation measures to minimize impacts if necessary. The Iiillcrest Estates project as proposed may bave a potential significant impact on topographic and cultural resources. As a result it is recommended that additional environmental documentation be prepared in order to provide a mexis to a&sess the significance of these impacts. recommendations voted rbove will provide this information, and allow the lead agency to reach an approariate detenrunadon of sigmifimmm CRAMER. V PRFZ� „ ��yy%ASSOCIATES Per 5016 ENVIRONMENTA4At1" A%'' UMG CONSULTANTS Macat EcucA, Oric= " Long FAP Rcvbcw If you have as questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter,please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, L� Charles 3. Jaorhis,cam,AIC? enc: Lang D. F Part I, U CRAMER, V( SOCIATES 7s 6016 ENVIRONMENT tVG CONSULTANTS o��gUFFO(k�0� 4",cm y� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rn _ SCOTT L. HARRIS O © r Richard G.Ward,Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham,Jr, y�0,( �,��� Town Hall.53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold.New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone IS 16) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 3, 1994 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, January 31, 1994: Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board continue to hold the final hearing open for an additional time period to expire at the Planning Board' s March 28, 1994 meeting. This is the final extension that the Planning Board will be granting for this subdivision. All outstanding items, as listed below, must be completed within the specified time frame: 1 . Health Department approval must be obtained; 2 . The required firewells must be installed, or a bond for such installation must be submitted to, and accepted by, the Town; 3 . All items listed in the Board' s December 21, 1992 correspondence must be both complied with, and finalized. 4 . Issues pertaining to road ownership, final road and drainage plans, and any outstanding inspection fees must be addressed and resolved within the time period. If the above mentioned time frame is not met, the final hearing will not be continued. If the hearing is not continued and your client wishes to proceed with the proposed subdivision, the submission of a new application will be required. I it Hillcrest Estates Section Two February 3 , 1994 Page 2 Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Sincerely,^^ Richard G. Ward IMS Chairman enc. cc : Harold Reese , Jr. fto r � 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 1 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS�+ r. "'�;""O.cr Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. R gyp+ Richard G. Ward a��. `-�J�QI� Town Hall, 53095 Main Ro; Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 21; 1992 - Ren Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM#1000-13-2-8.2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: On November 18 , 1992, Ken Abruzzo met with Melissa Spiro of this office to review the status of the above mentioned subdivision. He told Ms. Spiro that he is preparing revised maps to be submitted to the Suffolk County Health Department. Two or three lots will be eliminated in order to provide additional acreage for a water facility for the subdivision. Mr. Abruzzo asked if the Planning Board would notify him of any additional information that must be shown on the map. The following information is required: 1. The topography must be shown at 2 ' intervals. 2. The bluff line and the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area must be indicated on the map. 3 . Building envelopes must be shown for all sound front lots. 4 . The Planning Board will be proceeding with the SEQRA review for Section Two upon submission of the revised maps. However, the Long Environmental Assessment Form must be revised to reflect the changes that will be made to the subdivision map. Page 2 Hillcrest Estates, Section Two In addition, the Planning Board will be referring the Long Environmental Assessment Form to their Environmental Consultant for review. Your client will be responsible for submitting the $400. 00 review fee before the Planning Board will authorize its consultant to proceed with the review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ' Chairman cc: Joseph J. Lizewski, Chair, Groundwater Resource Committee Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Harold Reese, Jr. , Applicant Ken Abruzzo, Young and Young COUNTY OF SUFFOLK *: e ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING STEPHEN M. JONES, A.I.C.P_ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING May 5, 1994 Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Subdivision Map of Hill Crest Estates - Section 2 N/s/o Main Road, (N.Y.S. Rte. 25) , 590.86 feet e/o Browne Hill Road, Orient, New York. Dear Mr. Ward: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on May 4, 1994, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Subdivision Map of Hill Crest Estates, Section 2" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. Very truly yours, Stephen M. Tones Director of Planning by ti`0Su k Dowling, YJncipal Planner F: bdivision R iew Division File: S-SD-83-04.1 FD:mb Attachment cc: Edward Romaine, County Clerk H LEE DGN MSON BWLGING ■ VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHNAV ■ HAUHRAUGP. NEW •ORR 11 788 • 1516, 8595193 PAY 161611153-JO64 � S ee. 54: File No ' ° 3 -94-43 of Suffolk County Planning Cor ; 4, Article SIV of Suffolk County A,.,, r , f�1J AS, p rrscant. r ions A14-24, Article STV of the Sufic Aode, a referral was received by the :. P _aaning ion on April 1 , 1994, with respect r. e tcii Zed vision ,*fan of Hill Crest Estates -• 5, s:ba tteE. i Town of Southold Planning Board affe: located on t . /s/o Main Road, (N.Y.S. Rte. 25) , 59C, B:•oars HiJ' ; , Orient, in the Town of Southold, Ne., I:'=.1i:Ss, saLii referrer s considered by the Suffolk County P1,: Cc anissiCn a . ! meeting on May 4, 1994, and ;:i�I? 4S, tie COxmisei; as voted to disapprove said referral, i R SCL✓ED, Tla : the Sr f: County planning Commission hereby ac; r 01 '.ts stair :i. It Further It ECL']PD, Tl--:: said rr- o: ed plat is disapproved for the followic, In r.ccordnnc_ wr i.h Commission policy on a subdivision ai , lcta, whose ac - a: ;lues not meet the minimum lot area regc; , .. ,cn:.cg ordin: : "I the reco=endation is for DISAPPROVa7_ :cl:,oaing Crez.tion :)f i ;i :)division with substandard lots, that 1:: arets are 12 ; tnan the minimum required by the zoning of the proper,, , constitutes an overintensification of Su--' action : A establish a precedent for future suhd�'_" chis kind wh '. i .rould essentially be a circumvention of t Bnstd's actin tzken over the past years to upzone the ar 1!0 bring it I' : -E into conformity with modern lot area and a, standards ani! :c limit density. 1 :Lon by:: Co=issioner . men Seconded by: Commissioner Eli, rnicsion Vote: 1.3 1' :s nt - Yeas V' 12 NAys 0 Abstentions 1 Commissioner Cit ,, cd `lay 4, 19 )4 Hauppauge, New Yoil Suffolk G)unty Plat 1. , Commrission CRAMER, VSOCIATES ENVIRONMENCG CONSULTANTS April 29, 1994 Mr.Richard G.Ward, Chairman Southold Pannmg Board Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Review of EAF MAY 41994 Hillcrest Estates- Section 2 SCTM No. 1000-13-2-8.2 SOL11 TO'NN PLANNING BOARD Dear Mr. Ward: As r the your request,we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA,and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2 Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Environmental and Phmnirg Considerations The site consists of 22.90 acres of land, located on each side of Heath Drive,north of Hillcrest Drive,with 533 feet of frontage on Lon,$Island Sound The project has a lengthy history,whereby, Section 1 of the subdivision was reviewed and approved pnor to 1988. The subject Section 2 received preliminary approval at that time. Subsequent to approval, Section 1 was built, and withoutproper approvals,the developper constructed the roads for Section 2. Review of the Town files finds no prior SF.QRA Determination of Significance for Section 2. Hence,the Town is obligated to consider the environmental implications of the approval of Hillcrest Estates, Szction 2 at this time. The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The following summarizes the significant environmental considerations regarding the site. Overall,the northern part of the site is wooded in first growth woods including primarily black locust,black cherry and maple species. The canopy is sparse m many areas, and this in connection with clearing for roads and improvements has allowed significant light penetration giving rise to a thick understory of briars and rosa rugosa. The southern part of the site,primarily south of Sound View Drive, consists of overgrown field with herbaceous groundcover and pioneer species. The northern part of the site includes steep slope areas associated with the Harbor Hills terminal moraine. There are three lots proposed along the Sound front area 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 0 Hillaest Estates,orient Lang EAF Review (Lots 47,48 and 49).The proposed subdivision map depicts the "Approximate Top of Bluff',as wells as the'limit of Coastal Erosion Hazard Area". The three lots extend from Hill Crest Drive to the northrop perty line and include bluff as well as Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas within their boundaries. Part of the building envelopes for Lots 47 and 48 are within Coastal Erosion Hazard Area boundaries. Along the Sound,the toe of the slope has been undermined causing destabilization of the lower part of the bluff. The slope rises at a rate of 40-60 percent on the west side of the slope, to 60-80 percent on the east side of the slope. The slope in these areas is relatively stable as a result of vegetation and subsoils. The slope rises to a ridge with a high elevation of 107.1 feet on the west side of the Sound front land,that decreases in elevation to approximately 70 feet to the east With the exception of a significant mound in the vicinity of the high elevation on the west side of this area, the slopes are less severe in this area,in the range of 5-15 percent with localized slopes of 20-30 percent Additional areas with slopes in the range of 20-30 percent are present in several of the lots pproposed south of Hill Crest Drive. Slopes pose a si�mficant constraint to site deve of pment Use of Lots 47, 48 and 49 must be carefully regulated ;:Or n order to avoid significant erosion of the bluff Slopes on Lots 45 and 46 must also be considered in order to avoid erosion and sedimentation within the subdivision during construction and site use. The site consists of six soil types noted as follows: Salk include Beach and Escarpment on the northern 20 percent of site. Montauk Fine Sandy Loam acct Plymouth loamy Sand on the north central 40 percent of the site. Sclo Silt Loam a the mouth central 25 percent of the site. Haven Loam on the south 15 percent of the mite. Montauk Fine Sandy Loam and Scio Silt Loam have poor drainage qualities and may pose a constraint to the site. The Escarpment soils are subject to erosion and also pose a constraint to site use. Aerial photography from prior to 1975 and included in the soil survey, indicates that the southern 30 percent of the site was used for agricultural purposes. As noted previously, the site lies at a high elevation of tel 70 to 107 feet, with average central elevations of 30 to 40 feet The de�groundw�r beneath the site is I to 2 feet, therefore,the depth groundwater th part of site is 69 to 106 feet, and beneath the south part of the site is 68 to 105 feet. The site is within Groundwater Management Zone IV(unique water regime with special problems), and is north of the northern border of the Water Budget Area as depicted on the SCDHS Article 7 Map, and Figure 7-1 of the North Fork Water Supply Study. Nitrate and the ppeesstiucide aldicarb are the primary groundwater contaminants of concern on the North Fork. The area including the subject site was identified as having positive samples for aldicarb in the range of 3S to 13.9 in F�'gure 3 of the "Report on the Occurrence and Movement of Agricultural Chemicals in GroundLmtr orth Fork of Suffolk County" (SCDHS, "U)- This report made referencate contaminatiomappingcontainasearlier water supply sdy, fied the area beneath the southppaaofthesubject site as having tratehe"North Fork Water SupplyP]an" (SCDHS, ,showareas of ate but did not indicate elevated aldicarb be the subject site. There are no public water mains in the area of the site. Based on field CRAMER, VR OCIATES Pap2ef6 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Hillcrest Estates Orient Loog EAF Review inspection, test wells are beim installed on site to determine underling groundwater quality and suitability for on site water supply. Water and sanitary disposal systems must be appra�ed by Suffolk County Department of Health Sernc es. The site is zoned for one acre residential development,and the proposed development plan provides 20 lots with sizes of 40,000 square feet or more consistent with zoning. The surrounding lands are similarly zoned and Hillcrest Estates,Section 1 (south and west)is an approved plan that is in the begi'nn�ng stages of development. Sing family residences are present on lands east of the at'te. The proposed project will generate traffic commensurate with 20 single family units, averaging approximately'200 trips per day,with 20 peak hour trips. This trip generation is not expected to cause a significant burden on local transportation systems,though delays m crossing through lanes may occur due to lack of$aps during summer months with periods of hi4h ferry traffic volume. The site is a significant visual resource with exceptional views particularly during winter months. From Long Island Sound, the site appears fairly unique with a low bluff and wooded slope rising from the shorefront. Retention of vegetation and preservation of slope areas will minimize the visual alteration of the landscape. The North Fork has abundant cultural resources with historic structures and numerous documented archaeological sites. The Suffolk County Archaeological Association identified the North Fork generally as"Areas of Intensive Aboriginal Habitation"in their 1979 report on the Countys cultural resources. Additional research was conducted regarding the cultural sensitivity of the site. The New York State Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation(NYS/OPRHP) identifies the site as a"Zone of Multiple Site Listings", indicating more than one documented archaeological site within the area The Suffolk County site fisting includes site #1747(Orient Flaking Station ock Site)within approximately one mile south of the site, and site #1749 (Beaches Sound/Heath Farm)within approximately one mile west of the site. In addition,site #t744 (Five Acre Indian Village/Oyster Pond)lies within aapppproximately 1S miles southwest of the site. Based on these documented sites, archaeological sensitivity policy of NYS/OPRHP would indicate the need for a Stage I Cultural Resources Assessment. It is noted that in terms of site sensitivity due to environmental resources, the site is highly sensitive. The location of the site proximate to Long Island Sound,with tidal wetlands and small freshwater ponds throughout the area within a mile of the site would have provided an abundance of water and food resources to aboriginal cultures. In addition,published literature suggests that areas within proximity to eroded steep morainal slopes have increased sensitivity due to the availability of quartz pebbles for toolmaking and arrow points. In summary,the following site features indicate a high cultural resource sensitivity: a. The Noah Fork is genual is considered an area of intensive aboriginal babitstiao. b. Thee are two(2)documented pre-historic sites within one anile of the subject site. C. There are both freshwater and tidal wtdaads in proximity to the a pot site. d. There is as abundance of raw material for flaking outeriaL As a result,the subject site is expected to have a high cultural resource sensitivity. Therefore,in accordance with State cultural resources policy, environmental factors, and the responsibility of review agencies to identify irreversible and irretrievable CRAMER, VR SOCIATES Fage3of6 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Merest Eocaces,orient Long EAF Review cultural resources in accord with review guidelines of the State Environmental Quality Review Act,additional research concerning the archaeological resources of the site is warranted 4. Recommesdadons The site contains unique and valuable environmental features in the form of escarpments and steep slope topography,wooded slopes adjacent Long Island Sound, a diversity of soil types with some constraints,visual resources, and a high cultural resource sensitivity. These features require careful consideration by the Planning Board as lead agency in review of the project. The subject site has preliminary approval,and roads were prematurely constructed by the owner in 1988. Health pre=approvals are pr�ediny�on individual lots consistent with the and the applicant been required to complete additional requirements. At this time,in order to , give appropriate consideration to the environmental resources of the site, additional information concerning steep slopes,site disturbance and cultural resources is recommended,prior to final apppproval. Ibis is consistent with the State Environmental Qualt Review Act(SEQRA)which requires determining the environmental i i canoe of an action prior to final decision and prof implementation. Consideration of mitigation and sensitivity of resources at this stage of review will allow the Planning Board to reach anappropriate determination of significance through issuance of a SEQRA Declaration. Towards this end,the following requirements are suggested: 1) An area on tyre north side of the subject property should be established,where no disturbance to soils and vegetation will be permitted Ibis is necessary in order to avoid destabilization of steep slope areas above unstable bluff areas, which tx»ild result is slumping and erosion on the face of the slope. It is recommended that the non-disturbance area be easily mapped and marked in the field,and that it be landward of the majority of areas with slopes in excess of 50 percent at the crest of the ridge. The following language is suggested "there shall be an area established on Lots 47,48 and 49(northern three lots,map of Young k Young revised Mar.21,1M)of the Hillcrest F Mates,Section 2 subdivision whereby that will be no disturbance of the soih or vegetation,with the exception of tumor foot bwk and limited clearing for well placement(if necessary). For Lots 47 and 48,this area shall be north of a line 1311 north of and parahW to the south property Fine. For Lot 49,this area shall be north of a Fine 180 north of and psrahW to the south Property line" It is recommended that this requirement be placed directly on the subdivision man. and filed as a covenant on the overall subdivision as well as each ind victual building lot. 2) It is recommended that grading site plans be required for lots with steep slopes,prior to approve of f the final subdivision. The site plans for Lot7,48 and 49 should show conformance with the above noted covenant CRAMER, V5 SOCIATES Paae4or6 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Hillcrest Estates,Orient Long EAF Review and should depict cut and fill areas,retaining walls, driveway and sanitary systems of 13 or less, grading south from the ridge, and site stabilt7xtion- t�uough landscapingAll runoff from roofs and driveways should be directed to dry wells on site is order to minimize erosion potential. Due to the diminished building envelops for Lots 47 and 48, a front yard variance may be contemplated for these lots. If the Planning Board is in agreement with this measure to acltieve a greater setback from steep slope areas,the matter could be referred to the Board of Appeals with Planning Board surt. It is recommended that grading site plans be prepared for Lots 45 and 46 in order to establish a means of development of these two sites in a manner that will prevent erosion. Building permits should be consistent with the grading and landscaping concept, will be required in appropriate detail at the time of Building Permit review. 3) An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be prepared for development of Lots 45 through 49. The plan should provide a step by step account of development of these sites in a manner that will prevent erosion. Sequence of clearing,grubbing, stripping and stockpile of topsoil, topsoil stabilization and location, excavations and subsoil stockpile areas, site construction and re-stabilization should be detailed. Site construction must adhere to erosion control standards to be given final consideration at the time of Building Permit review. 4) A Stage I Cultural Resources Assessment (CRA)should be prepared for the site. The study should employ standard archaeological methods. Site sensitivity has been documented, however,background literature should be cited to identify archaeologic potential. Systematic subsurface testing should be conducted on the subject site. The following minimum standards for subsurface testing are recommended: IL A minimum 20x40 meter grid should be cued for the 229 age site. b. A stra*aphic log should be prepared for all test holes. d. Recovered cakwal materiel should be saved and properly documented. A list of qualified archaeologists can be provided if necessary,or the applicant ma call the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation for additional information if necessary. The Stage I report should be submitted to the Town prior to Final approval in order to assess the potential impact of the project on irreplaceable and irretrievable cultural resources, and/or devise mitigation measures to minimize impacts if necessary. The Hillcrest Estates project as proposed may have a potential significant impact on topographic and cultural resources. As a result it is recommended that additional environmental documentation be prepared in order to provide a means to assess the significance of these impacts. Recommendations noted above will provide this information, and allow the lead agency to reach an appropriate determination of significance. CRAMER, VR SOCIATES Yarsot6 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS HiRcrest Estates,orient Long EAF Review If you have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter,please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, 2Charlesoorhis,GBP,AICD enc: Long EAF Part 1,II CRAMER, VR OCIATES Paae6or6 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS C APR 29 194 13:02 TuWN OF SGUTHOLD F•2'-" 14.16-3 (2191}-7c � 617.21 � SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full CAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant, The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. Tile. full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assurud that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 7: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. 'The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: X Part 1 X Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (farts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: L3 A. 'TPre project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. O B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioner) Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions crzFs i "S JK TiOAf Name of Action Name of Lead Agency l Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer ccp° ifzcP. Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency rgnature reparer(If different f re o ib fi r)6 r,1 ,eGcl/JEL ,f-q DY . U i I tS—'2=9� CRAMS VOORHIS k ASSOCIA Date 54 North Country Roa C MAR 2 8 ,yy .17 I 1 . WFWLDTOIN 1 APR 29 '94 13:03 TOWN IAF SCUTH"LD P /5 PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION ' Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional " information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. it is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Hill Crest Estates , Section 2 LOCATION OF AC110N (Include Slual Addtass. Municipality and County) Heath Drive, Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York NAME OF APP4rC'ANTISPONSOF1 awsmasS TELEPHONE Young and Young, land Surveyors t 516, 727-2303 AOURESS 400 Ostrander Avenue CITYIPa STATE ZIP CODE Riverhead N.Y. 11901 NAME OF OWNER(Ir dillaram) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Harold Reese, Jr. , and others ( 5161 593-5200 AoonESS ' 855 Sunrise Highway Cli Tlf•0 STATE ZIP CODE Lynbrook N.Y. 11563 OESCnIPT1ON OF ACTION ' Residential Subdivision - 20 Lots Map of Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 Prepared by Young and Young, last dated March 21, 1994 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable r A: Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. T. Present land use: OUrban ❑industrial ❑commercial ❑Residential (suburban) 611ural [non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 22'9 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFT R�'6 COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 12.9 acres acres Forested Woodland ------j„a — acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 acres 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0 acres acres Water Surface Area n _ acres --- acres Unvegetated (Rack, earth or fill) Cliff & BeaCh 2.0 .teres 2.0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces D acres 3.3 acres Other (indicate type) Lawns & Landscape �— acres I I � acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? HaB HaA RdA MfB & MfC T,,v,r.�Scotkl'MeMLre5 M a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained 70 % of site fBlModerately well drained 3 a/�Suo S� OPoorly drained 0 - a/o of site b. If any agricultural land is involve Fl how many acres of soil are classified within soil qhfouah 4 of the NYS Land Classification System, 11FTA acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). n. Are..there bedrock outcroppings on Project site, Xes (nNo a. What is depth to bedrock, / —6W - (in feet) LU f= APR 29 94 1-:04 TOWN OF �UTHO P.4:5 Appro�;mate percentage of proposer. ,.r t site with slopes: U•IU'%u _ �. o IU I i'%„ 20 or j. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, Site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? OlYes WNO Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Yes Xtio ;. What is the depth of the water table? n-� p ��in feet! 68 —/©S /ya'2r'?'tiC' /i1! C;Erir7YL/7- S/R= 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? )+)Yes ONo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes 6No ii. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endan ered? Oyes LINO According to Young and Young Identify each species nv< !lr- /qq4/ 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site?//(i.e., clif,f//s, dunes, other geological formations) !Ayes ONO Describe f l iffc apn Rash /7[4"�a& tti< /yp��,AM eaC—A.Pei MV7- 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreatio ? Dyes nNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present,site include scenic views known to be important to the community? QIYes ONO - Vis OF L¢ur, -T-sc4vn SoL,&Aa rv" /to/ r2 C cy �p� Of s/rr 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Long Island Sound b. Size (In acres) N/A 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? 63Yes ONO NYSOE: y�znC� a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ( Yes ONo wr-rrA�ro s 'S X5 7LW S b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? (Ayes ONo 0�7/ O-$ /000 Fr. r:rr}ar OF 5'/7r- 18, Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25•AA, Section 303 and 3041 Oyes SINO 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 i of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes (]No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Oyes QNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 27 9 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 22.9 acres initially; 22.9 acres ultimately_ c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 proposed 40 C. maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. it residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 20 Ultimately � 20 1. Dimensions tin feet) of largest proposed structure �_ height; _40 width; T80 length. j Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N/A It. 3 - - -- - - --------------------------------------------------------------- RPR 29 '94 13:04 TOWN OF c-OUTHOLD � P•5/5 2 Now much natural motorial (i.t•. .,ck, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be recleinsed? 1J1Ye5 LINO ❑NIA a. If yes, for what intend ... purpose is the site being reclaimed? Residential Development I). Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Myes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? gYes ONO a. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 10.1 acres. S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Oyes 5N0 G. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 35 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi phased: N.A. a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year,.(including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent 'on subsequent phases? ©Yes ONO U. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes MNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 50 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Oyes fillNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Oyes bNO a. If yes, indicate type of waste•(sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Ides ONO Type Sanitary 1.1. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ONO Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? bYes ONO A1&zr#r)zn/ 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ' MYes ONO SOUAa4/�Z"7T a. If yes, what is the amount per month 3.6 tons S&C,77aAj b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? MYes ONO c. If yes, give name Southold Landfill ; location Cutchocdue d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes Q0No e. if Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Oyes ONO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tonsimonth, b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project Use herbicides or pesticides? Byes ONO Lawn Care 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes fnNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Oyes ONO 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? K)yes ONO If yes , indicate type(s) Electric 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23 Total anticipated water usage per day fi000 gallons?day. 2.1. Does project involve local. State or Federal funding? Dyes CONo If Yes, explain TO-)WtV OF SOUTHOLD • It Cll4.'•:�: Sub111111a1 Type Data ryV =hrlrr l'Ianninp Ucw:"i x_iYcs ONo Suhdlyi Sion 1986 -onir:1! Unar4 '_Ycs QINO I-14allh ovparunent ;CYes ONO Sanitary Disposal & Water Supply 1986 Agencies Dyes (AN0 :a1 Agencies S.C. Plan . 01Yes ONO Suhdivicion ei NYSDEC COlnlll. Qlyei ONo Snheliyicinn (Ti(tal Wcatlands) rcics Oyes CANO 1 and Planning Information posed action involve a planning or zoning decision? &Yes ONO indicate decision required: ting amendment Oaoning variance ❑spacial use permit c(subdivision Owe plan .vlreviilon of master plan ❑resource management plan Oother the zursing classification(s)of the site? "A" Residential - Agricultural the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by (he present xoning? lots Zp Go- the proposed zoning of the site? N/A the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? A AlA .+ roposed action consistent tvith lite fecommcnded uses in adopted local land use plansf MCI ONO re the predominant land uses) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? Siaential - "A" Resit]ential - Agricultural proposed action compatiLle with adjoiniul)suffouridior land uses within a 'A mile? .f7Yes ONO proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposedl 20 . what is the minimum lot size proposed? 40 000 ,(oposed action require ally autholization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes QNO :Ike ploposed action cteatc a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education. police. rnleCtinll)t ciyvs ONO 1. 11 yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? 6Yes ONO the proposed action result in the generation of traflic significantly above present levels?, Dyes nNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to liandle the additional tralfic? Dyes ONO, CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. rmalionad Detail 54 North Country Road ^h any additional information as may be needed to clarify your proiect. If there are Ml &A%V eyWK 11764 'ssociated with yuur proposal, please discuss such impacts and line measures which you propose to nnitigatc or rn. n 13 L/L42[6s l�. 002/�tSf�- i4SCi� • . Iication CAak1sU4,f_AL#-7 rG /L y Alj" Za" 5-Z-9/ rify that tha information nrnvided above•is true to the best of my knowlcdue. s!SPons r Name Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Date 03/22/94 Title Professional Engineer 1i611 is in the Coastal nn•a, and you arc a slate agency, cumplele lila Coastal Assessment form before proceeding .. . aitctsrucnl. 5 Part 2—P69JECT IMPACTS AND THEIR&GNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and Aeterminations beev masonablei The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simpl asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold c magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State an for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriat for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The Impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative an have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each questior • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of ti impact If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but thresho is lower than example, check column 1. _ d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to modera impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. Ts must be explained in Part 3. 1 1 2 3 Small to Potentlal Can Impact B= Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND --- - _. K Impact Project Chang 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the pro tet - - Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO / YES • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ex OYes ONS foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ OYes ❑N� 3 feet • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. O ❑ Oyes ON, • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ OYes ONS 3 feet of existing ground surface. •_Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more O OYes ❑N than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ OYes ON. tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ O OYes ❑N • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ OYes ON • Other impacts O ❑ OYes ❑N 2. Will there be an effect v. _.3y unique or unusual land forms found�on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ONO S • Specific land forms: — 25ZEDe SGyPr 01o srs ❑ Oyes ON �YLDd.iv'G BLUFF sZ , ��o Potentlal Can Impact Be Largo Mltlgated By ImpactImpact Project Changs • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ Oyes ONO • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage pattems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: O ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON 4MR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? XNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO. hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? %..ANO DYES Exampks that Mould apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal 13 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or O ❑ ❑Yes ONO migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ED ❑Yes ONO of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCFES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land ', andr Qso,u, rces? X10 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 / • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural El Dyes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 2 3 II to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Chang (Under Articles 15,24,2S of the Environmental ConseryationLa O ES Examples that would apply to column 2 �l``�``�tO ❑ ❑ OYes ONo • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ OYes ONo protected stream. i Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. O O OYes ONo • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. O O OYes ONc • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ OYes 0 N 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected exist X g new body of water? NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ OYes ON. or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ OYes ❑N. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ OYes ❑N. 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater 0 OYES quality or quantity? . Examples that would apply tq column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. O ❑ OYes N ON • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ' ❑ OYes D have approval to;serve proposed.(proiect) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ OYes ON gallons per minute pumping Capacity. • Construction of operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ Oyes ON supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ OYes ❑� ntly O ❑ 13 Yes Cl` • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities wh::h prese do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per ❑ O OYes ❑► day. • Proposed Action will likel- c3,13r siltation or other discharge into an ❑ D Dyes Gr existing body of water tv t'tc->Nicnt that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical El O OYes [31 products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas'without water ❑ O ❑Yes 0., and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ OYes ❑i require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. ❑ ❑ OYes ❑ • Other impacts: . Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patt n or surface 1J water runoff? NO OYES Exz:nples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. C OYes El Small to Potential Can Impact Be • MoilSts Large Mltigated By Imprct Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping}; or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO ES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617. , Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ _ ❑Yes ONO or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. X ❑ ❑Yes No • Cr�Fser impacts: ZszT r i i I• rnA:,u i r picivA)F VAm -1W /°fLiVAIL-UCcc— 7W7-rZ6n/ &I/VIAM77 pb7zmr77r4� evl3UL ENJI7yM6K/7' OF IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO *IES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facilityor site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑Yes ONO archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: D ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO ES ( )The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportun ❑ ❑Yes ONO ,C A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes; ONO 2 3 IMPACT ON T411SPORTATION *all to Potential Can Impod e 14 . Will there be an effect to existing transportation s ste sh Moderate Large Mitigated By O OYES Impact Impact Project Chung Examples that would apply to column 2 / • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N, • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. O ❑ Oyes ❑Ns • Other impacts: ❑ O ❑Yes ON, IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sourcey of fuel or energy supply? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ D ❑Yes ON. any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ O ❑Yes ON transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: D ❑ Oyes ❑N NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? p'11 0 OYES" Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑P facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day/ ❑ ❑ Oyes Oh • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local 0 _ ❑ OYes Oh ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ E3 Dyes ❑h noise screen. • Other impacts: D ❑ Oyes ❑h IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safryl NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 /`` • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑•. substances(i.e. oil, pesticides,chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ Dyes 1:1 form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural D ❑ ❑Yes ❑ gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ El ❑Yes l_ within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes (- �n 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 16. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing communily? Impact Impact Project Change ONO AYES Examples that would apply to column 2 //I • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the O ❑ ❑Yes . ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than S%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than S% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ O Oyes DNo • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of (and use. X ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes DNo • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes DNo 19. is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO OYES If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or if You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(:) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may b mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(- 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HISGERO, M.D.. M.P.H. COMMI1i5K/NER April 28, 1994 Richard G. Ward, Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Hillcrest Estates, Section Two SCTM#: 1000-13-2-8.2 Dear Mr. Ward: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS; "Department")has received your letter dated March 30, 1994, concembhg the above-referenced project. Tile Department has no objection to your designation as lead agency. Based on a review of the subject coordination, the Department offers the follow big comments. However, the Department wishes to reserve its right to provide more detailed infoltnation within the comment period(s) established for this action. Also, these corrunents should not be construed as an implicit SCDHS approval or rejection of the project, All applications are reviewed thoroughly with respect to Suffolk County Sanitary Code concerns by appropriate departmental porsonncl when SCDHS applications are completed. At the present time the applicant has been notified that test wells, and associatcCl water analysis, for all lots are required. Recent test well analysis (12/22/93) indicate parameters exceeding water quality standards for nitrate (10.1 mg/1) and Dactlzal 108 ppb. test well #3. Additionally, all three wells were shallow (<40' of water above wellscreen). Additional information will be provided when the water quality .malysis froln twenty (20) new lest wells is completed. ONJIOR 01 Cm'lllOrv4fVT14 DUALITY MAY 21994 D COUNTY CCNTCR RWCnNCAD, NY. 11901.9!97 e�zsloo SOUTHOLD TOWN PUNNING BOARD N f9 '.' - - 4 r1 ri N : : ❑ r r =: i_-L H :E: - W W r•1 -- -r Letter to Richard G. War April 28, 1994 Page 2 The applicant must comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitar1 Code and relevant construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details are essential to the review of this project. These considerations Lire reviewed completely at the time of:'CDHS application. SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems. The applicant, therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system without Health Department approval. Thank you for opportunity to review this application, If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078. Sincerely, 7'k cajr, 44,�e'(c Mark J. Reuschle Environmental Planner Office of Ecology MJR/antf cc: Vito Minei, P.E. Stephen Costa, P.E. Frank Dowling, SC Planning ms Alberti. Krupski, President Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President �� y` 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Garrell r0 .tc Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel y?JOl �.a0` Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Melissa Spiro, Planner Planning Board FROM: Southold Trustees RE: Proposed major subdivision for Hillcrest Estates, Section II SCTM #13-2-8. 2 DATE: April 13 , 1994 The Southold Town Board of Trustees will naturally rather see the building envelope placed at and behind the Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas. This would eliminate any involvement with the Town regulating the property in relation to house construction, and remove the burden from the property owner in complying with State and Town Laws. Thank you. APR 1 3 1994 $pUTHOLD TONIN PLANNING BOARD Southold Town Planning Board 3 March 28, 1994 • 0 Mr. Ward: Hillcrest Estates - Section 2 - This major subdivision is for 20 lots on 22 . 9 acres located in Orient. SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 5 . Harold Reese: Good evening Mr. Chairman. I hope you 've had a chance to review a letter that was delivered to you this morning here from counsel, concerning just our progress certainly on this particular project. I have to say that in the many years here that our efforts as a family have been devoted to a project better known as Cove Beach. As you, of course, are aware, this is not a priority anymore. It' s no longer our responsibility and that now full effort, certainly on behalf of the Reese' s, is now devoted to Hillcrest Section 2 . There' s been some concern certainly, about firewells on this project. I 've been in touch with the Orient Fire Commissioner, Mr. Rudy, who is supposed to have faxed or delivered a letter reiterating our position of what we plan to do if the firewells don' t have the draw that is necessary and we have to go to plan B, which they have approved in installing 10, 000 gallon tanks . This was done with our contractor here, Casola Wells, and we're proceeding accordingly. The Health Department issue, we were back up there today drilling I believe, one of the last wells for testing. The weather for the last three months has certainly been a factor, with snow, ice, and of course today with mud. I have Paul Grosser here to give you an update on just where we're at with the Health Department. Frankly, we are just looking for more time. The roads are in. The utilities are in. We have Young and Young at this point addressing what open items might be there, as far as the roads and any of the utilities, but maybe Mr. Grosser can fill you in on just the time frame that we ' re going to need with the Health Department. Mr. Grosser? Paul Grosser: Thank you Harold. Paul Grosser, President, P.W. Grosser Consulting. We should have the last wells finished probably within the next two days . They've got about 1-1/2 wells to go yet. After that we ' ll be in contact with the Health Department, they' ll be ready to schedule the sampling after we develop the wells . We ' re probably talking about a month before we get the lab results back from the Health Department. Whatever covenants may be necessary on lots that don't have adequate water quality will have to be submitted to the Suffolk County Attorney' s Office and we expect -that will probably take another month. So we 're talking a minimum of two more months before we have a final write-off from the Health Department. We do have forty feet of water in the well, so we don' t have to go back to the Board of Review with the Health Department, so it should be a normal approval situation. Any question? Harold Reese: At this point, Mr. Chairman, we are just seeking some more time to get this .final approval and get back to you with the Board of Health. We seek your indulgence in granting us that extension. Southold Town Planning Board 4 March 28, 1994 Mr. Ward: What is the time frame? Are you looking for the two month time frame at this point? Mr. Reese: Well, unless the Board comes up with any other problems at this point, it' s just the Health Department issue that I 'm aware of with these related covenants, that certainly, yes, it would be from what Mr. Grosser says, approximately two months to get the Health Department approval . Mr. Ward: OK, because we did say at the last meeting we would take some action tonight, trying to move this project. Mr. Reese: I realize that. I believe we've shown pretty good diligence here trying to get this thing moved inasmuch as the other project is not our responsibility. Thank you. Mr. Ward: OK. What' s the pleasure of the Board? Mr. McDonald: Mr. Chairman I make a motion to close the hearing. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes : Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. McDonald: I 'd like to make a further motion. BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Mr. Ward: Is there a second? Mr. Orlowski : Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes : Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. So tonight, then, we did close the hearing, which will put us into a time frame of approximately 60 days, a couple of months, so we expect you to stay very diligent on this project and finish it up. Mr. Reese: Thank you. MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS, LOT LINE CHANGES AND SET OFF APPLICATIONS Southold Town Arming Board 21 • March 7, 1994 Mr. ard: I would just like to personally, as Chairman and so on beh f of the members of the Board, we have two missin tonight t they will definitely be reading this transc pt, I really wou like to thank you all for coming and spe fically the fact tha we held a, as we do in Southold, a ve�civil meeting and th we all have exchanges to make ar)xr points of view and directi s where we're coming from. have heard everything you've aid tonight. We as the P nning Board have certain restriction on us as to what we c do. The change in the code, obviously, u heard where tha s going to have to go. That 's going to be 'n the direct i n of the Town Board. But here again, on behalf of he Board c�� thank you all for coming and your comments are duly oted j' Mr. McDonald: I make a motio hat we close the hearing. Mr. Ward: Is there a se nd? Mr. Orlowski : Secon . Mr. Ward: All i favor? \ Ayes : Mr. M onald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward\ Mr. Ward• Opposed? Motion carried. Subdivisions Hearings Held Over From Previous Meetings Mr. Ward: Hillcrest Estates - Section 2 - This major subdivision is for 20 lots on 22 . 9 acres located in Orient. SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 .5 . What 's the pleasure of the Board? Mr. McDonald: I 'd like to make a motion that BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board continue to hold open the final hearing for an additional time period to expire at the Planning Board's March 28, 1994 meeting. This is the final extension that the Planning Board will be granting for this subdivision. Ben Kinzler: Mr. Chairman, the Board, I believe had previously held it open, to schedule the final hearing for March 28th. When the resolution was initially adopted by the Board, we had set out with the greatest of speed and deliberation to proceed to get the final approval done. As you know, the ongoing problem has been one of water quality. And we 've been back and forth in terms of negotiations and if fact in efforts in drilling the new test wells at the site and negotiations with the Board of Health to obtain necessary approvals . In fact, we Southold Town Anning Board 22 4� March 7, 1994 had come to them with a plan to install a public water system at the site, which was ultimately disproved by them. The last meeting, I had reported to you that we were going to go ahead and drill individual wells on each of the 20 lots . We had already had 3 test wells drilled. We then proceeded to drill an additional 7 wells . We've been hampered by every. . .we 've been a victim I guess by Murphy's Law; if it could go wrong, it has . There have been 3 major snowfalls . Each site had been individually marked so that we could identify the sites, the snow then covered the markings and we couldn't identify the individual sites . We have Paul Grosser here, our hydrogeologist. In addition to that, we went from Casola to another well company for the purpose of expediting it and directed them to move ahead with all deliberate speed. They've had nothing but problems on the site, in the course of drilling. (CHANGE TAPE) . They encountered nothing but delays and frankly the additional cost to us - it appears that the sand is of such fine quality, the augers are incapable of not being clogged, and so that they had to now go to a different set of augers which is supposed to be arriving at the site very shortly. To date, we have a total of 7 wells drilled. The cost to do that, to evidence our commitment to proceed, has been approximately $25,000, with respect to just the 7 additional wells . I understand from Mr. Grosser that the March 28th date is just not a realistic one and in order to proceed the additional financial commitment is probably going to be another 30 to $40 , 000 - just with respect to the wells . I know there are a few items open in addition to the wells . As to those items, very frankly, we can move ahead very expeditiously on those. We're just beyond any ability to comply with a March 28th date, given the present set of circumstances . I 've brought Mr. Grosser here. If you have any particular questions, he' ll be more than happy to answer them. We would ask that you consider your determination of March 28th; that you give us a period of 90 days . Mr. Grosser assures me that within the 90 day period there can be compliance with the County, Board of Health. Mr. Ward: How about the other items in our February 3rd letter? Mr. Kinzler: Alright, with respect to firewells, we could start with that. When I appeared here last time I told you that one of the problems that we had in moving forward, was that we had employed Casola Well Drillers . In fact, back in October of 1993 we had employed Casola with for the purpose of having them install the 4 firewells and paid them a substantial sum of money. To date, they have not completed the first one. When the urgency of moving ahead with the water wells on each of the individual 20 lots became apparent, we engaged another well drilling company - Land Air Water - and we 've gone to another source to have the work done. Again, it being our intention to move expeditiously. Clearly, Casola was either not willing or Southold Town Anning Board 23 • March 7, ' 1994 able to move as expeditiously as the schedule here required. Casola is in the process of completing the first well . With respect to the wells on this site, what I would propose to do is provide the Board with a bond for the installation of the wells, subsequent of course to a final approval on the subdivision. And we ' ll do that expeditiously. With respect to item number 3 of your February 3, 1994 letter and the items of December 21 letter, I 've spoken to Tom Wolpert from Young & Young, in fact I finally reached him today, and he sent me over some correspondence which leads me to believe that there had been some efforts to comply with that. Apparently they have not done so. I was unable to determine specifically what items are open, but I can tell you that within 30 days from this date, we will certainly attempt to comply with every single one of them. I can arrange a conversation tomorrow by telephone with Mr. Wolpert and your office in an effort to determine the specific nature of the items that are open, which are essentially plan items, and address those. There was one item that was unclear and perhaps the Board could clarify. In your December letter I think you talk about certain issues with respect to the roads . Oh, I 'm sorry, I think it was an earlier letter. But I think there may have still been an open issue with respect to the roads - oh, I 'm sorry, it ' s in your February 3rd letter - the issues is pertaining to road ownership and I assume that what you are referring to is the transfer of title to the roads to the Town, is that correct Mr. Chairman? Mr. Ward: Well, I guess it' s a question of whether it' s going to be a dedicated road or whether it' s going to be a homeowners association in terms of ownership of roads . Mr. Kinzler: What would the preference of the Board be, as a matter of course? We really have no problem either way. We would be willing to go, really at the discretion of the Board; whatever the Board' s preference. Mr. Ward: Well, there seem to be many issues here. It may not seem like alot to you, but in a sense these items keep staying outstanding and other than the Health Dept. and wells that you need on each site, which maybe you've had some weather impediment, these other items should clearly have been done by now. I don't believe there' s any excuse for that. The Board' s in a position of constantly putting off and extending beyond reasonableness, in our opinion, the final on this. And as far as I 'm concerned, is that if you can' t get everything else in - if there ' s something missing on the 28th - if there' s one item missing and it happens to be. . . if we had the bond for the firewell and there ' s a couple of wells that are missing, we may consider it. But with this outstanding laundry list, believe me, the 28th is (inaudible) , and I know a couple of members that aren' t here, are ready to just say go back and start again. So I 'm just telling you that right now and be up front with you. Let ' s get this thing going. It ' s been drag, drag, drag. Southold Town Poning Board 24 • March 7,1994 Mr. Kinzler: With that admonition, then we will proceed. The singular concern we have is the expenditure of additional money to drill wells . If the Board would allow us to complete all the other items on or before the 28th, and to defer the expenditure of the funds to install the additional 10 wells, which, if you can appreciate, is substantial, would the Board consider doing that? Mr. Ward: Well, the problem is, if you need that for Health Dept. approval, that ' s part and parcel of the approval of the subdivision. I mean if there ' s no Health Dept. approval, there' s no subdivision. Mr. Kinzler: I could expend $25,000, $30,000, $40,000 to finish the additional wells . I just don' t have the ability to come before you with that completed. My purpose in coming here today was to tell you, I ' ll do the other items and if you want to condition an extension upon our completing or making substantial compliance by the 28th, we will then proceed forthwith with the wells . But to go ahead and put in another $40, 000 and then hope on the 28th when we come back here that the Board may or may not consider an application to extend it, is really. . . Mr. Ward: Truthfully, what' s the consequences of us not extending it? It means you go back to ground zero, you re-file the plans . That ' s certainly minimal in comparison to $40, 000 for wells . Mr. Kinzler: We've been through an awful lot of time and expense. Some of it having to do with issues of the Board, alot of it not having to do with the Board. There have been issues with Cove Beach which have been very problematic, other issues relating to financing with North Fork, some of which you may be aware of. Other issues regarding some partnership problems in the Reese organization. We resolved all those issues, I believe. Some of them favorably, some of them at enormous expense. We' re now at a point where we put all of those other issues aside and we' re in a position to try and focus on this one issue, which is of some importance to my client. My client has demonstrated during the past approximate 2 months a willingness to proceed expeditiously on it and if you will, put our money where our mouth is, and we proceeded that way. Mr. Ward: Well, it would be real helpful to come on the 28th with everything done but the one item you can' t do, which is a couple of wells, and let us consider it. But, let ' s have everything else done. Mr. Kinzler: Thank you Mr. Chairman. Members of the Board, thank you. Mr. Ward: Motion? . Mr. Orlowski : Second. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ` "' P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. r Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald �� Fax (516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 1, 1994 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 North Country Road Miller Place, NY 11764 Re: Review of EAF Hillcrest Estates - Section 2 SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 .2 Dear Messrs . Cramer and Voorhis : The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Also enclosed are: 1 . Copy of the map dated March 21, 1994 . 2 . Planning Board resolution dated February 3, 1994 . 3 . Planning Board correspondence dated December 21, 1992 . The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on March 28, 1994 . The $400 . 00 review fee has been submitted by the applicant. If all is in order, the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the May 9, 1994 public meeting. Please submit your report no later than May 2, 1994 in order for the Board to review it before the meeting date. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. This subdivision has an involved history. Please call me when you receive this letter and I will discuss the history with you. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Sincerely, Melissa Spiro/ Planner encs. pS4FFOCk�o = o��� - Gym PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS co P"': rT SCOTT L. HARRIS �® Richard G. Ward,Chafrnn Supervisor George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. ,( Town Hall, 53095 n Road .S Mark h L. Edwards P. O. Box Main 179 Kenneth McDonald Southold,New York 11971 Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 3 , 1994 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, January 31, 1994: Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board continue to hold the final hearing open for an additional time period to expire at the Planning Board' s March 28, 1994 meeting. This is the final extension that the Planning Board will be granting for this subdivision. All outstanding items, as listed below, must be completed within the specified time frame: 1. Health Department approval must be obtained; 2 . The required firewells must be installed, or a bond for such installation must be submitted to, and accepted by, the Town; 3 . All items listed in the Board' s December 21, 1992 correspondence must be both complied with, and finalized. 4 . Issues pertaining to road ownership, final road and drainage plans, and any outstanding inspection fees must be addressed and resolved within the time period. If the above mentioned time frame is not met, the final hearing will not be continued. If the hearing is not continued and your client wishes to proceed with the proposed subdivision, the submission of a new application will be required. s 0 Hillcrest Estates Section Two February 3 , 1994 Page 2 Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward IM5 Chairman enc. cc: Harold Reese, Jr. �;rrec, ice. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS t 1' ,. SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman .cr Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. "%'�r .;, Richard G. Ward d f� Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 21, 1992 Tlen Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: H.illcres,: Estates Section 'dao East Marion, New York SCTM#1000-13-2-8.2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: On November 18 , 1992, Ken Abruzzo met with Melissa Spiro of this office to review the status of the above mentioned subdivision. He tDld Ms. Spiro that he is preparing revised maps to be submitted to the Suffolk County Health Department. Two or three lots (iill be eliminated in order to provide additional acreage for a water facility for the subdivision. Mr. Abruzzo a3ked if the Planning Board would notify him of any additional information that must be shown on the map. The following informatLon is required: 1. The topojraphy must be shown at 2' intervals. 2. The bluf : line and the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area must be indicated on the map, 3 . Building envelopes must be shown for all sound front lots. 4 . The Planning Board will be proceeding with the SEQRA review for Section Two upon submission of the revised maps. However, the Long Environmental Assessment Form must be revised to reflect the changes that will be made to the subdivision map. Page 2 Hillcrest Estates 2ction Two In addition, Planning Board will be erring the Long Environmental Asscz :vent Form to their Envirt ntal Consultant for review. Your Lent will be responsible submitting the $400 . 00 review fee - -,fore the Planning Board 1 authorize its consultant to proceed with the review. Please contact this office if you have questions regarding the above Very truly yc ; s, Bennett Orlows i, Jr. � t fr<. Chairman cc: Joseph J. Lizewski, Chair, Groundwater Rc ; urce Committee Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Harold Reese, Jr. , Applicant Ken Abruzzo, Young and Young r�� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. X :y Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax (516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mc1Rc H 30, 1994 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1 . Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3 . Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: 14;krest Ef; a s Sec+; , — w-o SCCmlI t000- t3 •1,. 9.)- Requested 1Requested Action: `iZeskleTl a� SubOtJ $',o - :ZO Io+s nro 21.9 acaS kxa�e& �(QI.MinN Gfy QTfI Y41 J IAG 15 t1{.� � � TWO S 'tF.Crt !`C 9ramc�-tct .ertZi �rtlev SeoTl olaTawn 'ode nc 'F-NO-D*'%* Ct. SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( X ) Unlisted Contact Person: 1'CiI55A SP,2o ( 516) -765-1938 r The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (X ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) other. ( See comments below) . Comments: �ack�roon� '�rrX'�r��r<ac.l ap�roJcJC grarS�e� -FOr ���crrs�' ES�� ' Ealita eco red : SQc!'\on1U 32 loi-S • Sec�< 5 �w.Cane arcl S¢elie-n�� e.,` BI�SIp1. . seckko -"(wa was C",4c�e� Ato CeA; ,., ae ��4Nh:Nq Dc4QC� C4y>rn�2\�, Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, 'V Richard G. Ward Chairman �ppeu-ts *Board of Trustees gt3i-ld ' • n � Southold Town Board xSuffolk County Dept. of Health Services *-NYSDEC - Stony Brook y-NYSDEC - Albany c 9 Dasa* of n t_ FsF * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies 14-16 (2191)-7c 617.21 S EQ R Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAI is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. Fhe full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible, impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Tide of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different f �p re o ib fi r) U iJDate MAR 2 8 i99� 1 SOUTHOLDTOWN _- PLANNING BOARD PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional " information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Sltanl Addict,, Municipality and County( Heath Drive, Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York NAME OF APPttCAnT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Young and Young, Land Surveyors t 5161 727-2303 ADDRESS 400 Ostrander Avenue CITYIPO STATE ZIP COBE Riverhead N.Y. 11901 NAME OF OWNER(ll dRlawnt) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Harold Reese, Jr. , and others t 5161 593-5200 ADDRESS 855 Sunrise Highway CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Lynbrook N.Y. 1.1563 DEScnIPTION OF ACTION Residential Subdivision - 20 Lots Map of Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 Prepared by Young and Young, last dated March 21, 1994 Please Complete Each Queslion—Indicale N.A. if not applicable A: Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) f ]Rural (non-farm) ❑forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 22'9 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFT RCOMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 12.9 acres 6 acres Forested Woodland $ 0 acres 4 ? acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 acres 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0 acres 0 acres Water Surface Area n acres IT acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) C1 if & Beach 2.0 acres 2.0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 acres3.3 acres Other (Indicate type) Lawns & Landscape —b acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? HaB, HaA, RdA, MfB & MfC a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained 70 % of site ®Moderately well drained 0 —./. Of site ®Poorly drained 0 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involN 1A how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? / acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are.there bedrock outcroppings onproject site? ❑Yes INNo a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet) 2. i Approx,mate percentage of propose,. ,.r!pit site with slopes: _'O IU",a _74_k _ Io 15 20 _ % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the N,lnOnal Registers of Historic Places? OYes I INo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? =,Yes XNo a. What is the depth of the water table? 0_1001 in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? J(7Yes ONO 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes LANO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes KINo According to Young and Young Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ®Yes ONO Describe _111 iffc and Rpar•h 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes )ONO If yes, explain 14. Does the present.site include scenic views known to be important to the community? WYes ONO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Long Island Sound b. Size (In acres) N/A 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? 6Yes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? CXYes ONO b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Dyes ONO 19. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and. 304? ❑Yes g1NO 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article a of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes ®No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes QNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 97_q acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 22.9 acres initially; 22.9 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 proposed 40 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 6 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 20 Ultimately - 70 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure — 15 height; 40 width: _80 length. j Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N/A ft, 3 2. How much natural material (i.o. -.1ck, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas he reclaimed? Oyes [:]No ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intend ... purpose is the site being reclaimed? Residential Development b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Myes ONO C. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? QYes ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 10.1 acres. S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes ON G. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 36 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N.A. a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes PNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 50 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes ONO If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes t)No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposa) involved? Mes ONO Type Sanitary 1.1. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes MNo Explain - 1S. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ]Yes ONo 16. Will lite project generate solid waste? ' Ayes ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month 3.6 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? (Ayes ONO c. If yes, give name Southold Landfill ; location Cutchogue d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes MNo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes LANo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project bse herbicides or pesticides? 09Yes ONO Lawn Care 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Oyes InNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes ONO 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑Yes ONO If yes , indicate type(s) Electric 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day b000 gallons/day. 2.1. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes MNo If Yes, explain 4 'S. Apprssat> Reyu. .!d: Submittal Type Date ns, Town. iii.,.••;s• Gunn: _.1'es AN, �h- Tosvrs. 'Hi Ihre Planuing 00..rd Lyet ONO Subdi vi Sion 1906 ity. Town honing floafd Yes [INo -4. County Health Department Eyes ONO Sanitary Disposal & Water Supply 1986 Wier Local Agencies ❑Yes (�Nci ]tile( Regional Agencies S.C. Plan. ❑Yes ONO Subdivision IateAgencies NYSDEC C0111111. Byes ONO Suhdjvis)nn ITid ]I W( tl Inds) .•doral Agencies Dyes DINo =. Zoning and Planning Information Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision( byes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit [(subdivision ❑sire plan Oilesv/revision ul master plays ❑resource management plan ❑other What is the zoning clauification(s)of the site( "A" Residential - Agricultural %Vital is the maximuns potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 20 lots What is the proposed zoning of the sites N/A What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? _ N/A .{ Is the proposed action consistent With the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans] 1myes ONO What are like predominant land uses) and zoning classifications within a '/. mile radius of proposed action? Residential - "A" Residential - Agricultural Is dse proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/. milet ,Qyes ONO 11 the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 20 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? X0,000 Will proposed action require any authorizations) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes l-y,)No 1 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire proteclion)t k;Yes ONO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? UX Yes ONO t. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels?, Dyes ONO a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional Iraffict Dyes ONO ]. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse ]pacts associated will) your proposal, please discuss such impacts and life measures which you propose to (litigate or Void them, Verification 1 certify that the information Prnvided abuve'is true to the best of my knowledge. ;Tifirarrt.'SponDate s r N.trlle Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. 03/22/94 �+ L, goalule 1 .�/��72`Z`I 4!0� Z164 �t'c' Title Professional Engineer I11 Ibis assessment.1.action is in else Coastal Area, and iib you are a stale agency, eonsplete the Coastal Assessnlenl ferns before proceeding 5 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward,chairman ' George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Bennett Grlowsk4 Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road _ _ P.1. Box Mai Mark S.McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516) 765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Marc 30 1191Li Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of - A llcrea-t Hamlet/Localit Y S.C.D.P.W. Topo No. ; Zoning S. C. Tax Map No. : DOD - 13 Major Sub. X_ Minor Sub. Site Plan Cluster MATERIAL SUBMITTED: fj')d` mp cL4tA 3I11I99 r'r � ' Y Plat ( 3 copies) x Road Profiles ( 1) Drainage Plans (1) _Topogroaphical Map ( 1) Site Plan ( 1) Grading Plan ( 1) Other materials (specify, and i e number o copies) Lll_C. r�vy �rrtcrl k'nNv 1 rlay(KG 483 u✓c( �3o wn 3 y a Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet CONTINUED REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an Unlisted (Type I) (Type II)Action. 2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3 . E.I .S. statement enclosed. (Yes) (No) . 4. The proposed division has re c ived approval from the S.C. Dept of Health. (Yes) (No . Comments: / ' , Fw IJ ( ' 4or • ?id nPP oJaX afrjftiec for 'WckIbNs 1. Div S 3 83. H SiNo2 12.18g,o w r I o (.' 2 0 10 111(12- of "Co rorr.Pl. ov4 d. nn -h'mG445A,'on Q I' k: s�bm�-FF ` o•F 'fte ;•}pc,�/ 'C� SF R �'in1wQ '^+�5 wiR��n1 a 61 b.a / 'rw_ •Wam(,�oow.'"�t o1os2 4--ML -Cwiok 4.ew;111 (,srL s'eo(Sy rrs,01'bn� . We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) (No) Referral received 19 by Suffolk County Planning Commission and assigned File NO. Very truly yours, �1'C/MJ �- vai Richard G. Ward �S Chairman r '1 G'Jr r R,L 1 PUANNING-BOWRD 1 ti IL T6Vri OFS6b OLD StiFFOLN Southold, N.Y. 11971 HENRY E. RAYNOR. Jr., Chairman TELEPHONE 765-1938 JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI. Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr. William F. Mullen, Jr. June 24 , 1982 Mr. Harold Reese, Sr. 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, New York 11563 Re: Hill Crest Estates Dear Mr, Reese: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Tuesday, June 15 , 1982 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the prelim- inary map of the major subdivision known as Hill Crest Estates , located at Orient, subject to the maps being revised to reflect the Orient Fire Commissioner' s request for firewells and the Suffolk County Planning recommendations . If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours , HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Susan E. Long, Secretary f P LAN NINGOARD TOWN O SOUT _O ) Southold, N.Y. 11971 HENRY E.RAYNOR,Jr.,Chairman TELEPHONE JAMES WALL 765-1938 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,Jr. WILLIAM F.MULLEN,Jr. June 9, 1983 Mr. Harold Reese , Sr. Reese Bros . , Inc . 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, New York 11563 Re: Hill Crest Estates , Section I Dear Mr. Reese : The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Wednesday, June 1 , 1983 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board over- ride Suffolk County Planning Commission' s recommendations dated May 5 , 1983 with regard to the final map of Hill Crest Estates , Section I , located at Orient. Our file indicates that the performance bond has not been posted with the Town Clerk, nor the inspection fee paid, which is 4% of the amount of the performance bond. Very truly yours , HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Susan E . Long, Secretary Enc . County recommendations i� C UNTY OF SUFFOLK X1„^1�Q11p� 'J �,���n z✓ /✓L/1� PETER F. COHALAN IC` ,UFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING LEE E. KOPPELMAN DIRFCTOR OF PLANNING Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Sr. , Chzi.rman Mav 5, 1983 Town of Southold Planning Bo. rd Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Subdivision Man of Hill Crest Estates, Section 1 Northerly side of Main Road, New York State Route 25, 590.86 feet easterly from Brown's Hill Road, Orient, New York. Dear Mr. Raynor: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on Mav 4, 1983, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat entitled, "Subdivision Map of Hill. Crest Estates, Section 1", rezerred to it purs�uant to Section 1333 of the Suffolk County Charter. After due study and deliberation it resolved to disapprove said map for the following four reasons : 1. Cross intersections are being created within this subdivision with one of these intersections located within this section. Such inter- sections within a residential subdivision are to be avoided as they are considered to be less safe than the T-type intersection accord- ing to the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2. The change in direction of the road at Lot 27 is considered unsatis- factory because of the sharp bend that is created by the use of a 100 foot centerline radius. Not only does this alignment present potential traffic problems it is aesthetically unpleasing. Use o� a minimum radius of 150 feet for residential streets in new subdivisions is recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers . Con- sidering the change of direction that the road makes at this location a larger radius would be more suitable to avoid the appearance of an unaesthetically pleasing kink in the road. 3. The amount of building area between the front setback line and the ' 100 foot setback from the bluff on some of the shorefrontlots ap- pears insufficient to site a house. 4. No information was provided to show that there will not be any access to the beach from the shorefront lots nor has any other information been provided to show what measures will be taken to preserve the shoreline. t15YN o� VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY ( III, _J HAUPPAUGE,L.L.NEW YORK 11788 151 61 360-5192 Mr. Henry E. Raylo, Jr. • - 2 - i May 5, 1983 Re: Subdivison Map of Hill Crest Estates, Section 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission also offers the following comment on the map for your use and consideration: The subdivision should be redesigned to eliminate the cross intersections, smooth out the change in direction in Hill Crest Drive, and provide greater depth for the shoreline lots. Clearing out undergrowth should be carefully controlled " to minimize erosion of the soil by wind and water. i ■ Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning by � l �, �fJ7d/ Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section File: S-SD-83-04 CCL :jk Encl. : Map cc: A. J. Felice, County Clerk PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax(516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards _T y Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 30, 1994 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 .2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, March 28, 1994 : BE IT RESOLVED to close the final hearing which was opened on October 19 , 1992 . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. The Planning Board, by closing the final hearing, has established a time frame of sixty-two ( 62 ) days to make a final determination on the final subdivision. The final determination has been scheduled for the Planning Board' s May 23, 1994 public meeting. Therefore, all outstanding items must be completed by that date. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, 1)rC Richard G. Wards Chairman cc: Harold Reese, Jr. y . IA PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y Richard G.Ward, Chairman g Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. b ®�� Southold,New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald 'AN Fax(516)7653136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees FROM: Melissa Spiro Planner RE: Proposed Major Subdivision for Hillcrest Estates, Section Two SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 .2 DATE: March 30, 1994 Enclosed is a copy of the map dated March 21, 1994 for the above mentioned subdivision. Please review the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area shown on the map and the limits of the adjacent building envelopes . The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on March 28, 1994, and it is expected that a SEQR determination will be made at the Board' s May 9, 1994 public meeting. If possible, please submit your comments prior to the May 9th meeting. Please let me know if need any additional information. enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward, Chairman » n- w' Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. '�,� P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. e. ti Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald �7 +4 w�' Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards h T, Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 30, 1994 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE : Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 .2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, March 28, 1994 : BE IT RESOLVED to close the final hearing which was opened on October 19, 1992 . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. The Planning Board, by closing the final hearing, has established a time frame of sixty-two ( 62 ) days to make a final determination on the final subdivision. The final determination has been scheduled for the Planning Board' s May 23, 1994 public meeting. Therefore, all outstanding items must be completed by that date. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Harold Reese, Jr. BEN KINZLER Q ATTORNEY AT LAW 40 GUTTERMILL ROAD / N SUITE 200 GREAT NEGK. NEW YORK 11021-5306 15161482-8300 FAX 516-482-2749 DEBORAH BETH HAHN March 25, 1994 Mr. Richard G. Ward 0 W D Chairman Southold Town Planning Board MAR 2 8 1994 Town Hall 53095 Main Road SOUTNOLDTOWN Southold, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD Re: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Ward: On behalf of my clients, I wish to express my appreciation for the Board' s graciousness in allowing us to appear before you on March 7 , 1994 . In furtherance of our client' s application in this matter, I wish to enclose the following items: 1. Twelve (12) prints - Subdivision Map, last dated March 21, 1994 , amended to indicate approximate top of bluff line, limit of coastal erosion hazard area, building envelopes for sound front lots, new tax map number, contours, typical plot plan and well detail. 2 . One (1) original and one (1) copy of Long Environmental Assessment form dated March 22 , 1994 . (The requisite review fee in the sum of $400. 00 has already been mailed to you by our client. ) With regard to approvals from the Suffolk County Health Department, I am pleased to report that wells have been drilled and completed on eighteen (18) of the twenty (20) lots. As I indicated to you at the March 7, meeting, my clients suffered substantial delays in the installation of the wells as the result of the recent snowstorms and wintry weather conditions all of which halted work on the site. Additionally, the drills were repeatedly disabled by the presence of very fine subsurface sand and soil on the site. Wells on the two remaining lots are scheduled to be completed early next week and upon completion will be developed and water samples taken by the Board of Health for evaluation. I understand that an appointment has been scheduled for the Board of Health to take the requisite samples for testing and that test results should then be reported back within approximately thirty (30) days thereafter. On October 14 , 1993 my clients contracted with Casola Well Drilling Inc. to install fire wells on the site. After drilling to a depth of 207 feet, Casola remained unable to achieve the requisite water capacity. Accordingly, we have obtained permission for the Orient Board of Fire Commissioners to install 10, 000 gallon storage tanks in lieu of fire wells. Installation of the tanks is scheduled and should be completed by April 15, 1994 . I understand that a letter from Casola Well Drillers Inc. confirming the foregoing has previously been forwarded to the Board. With respect to the roads, a final road and drainage map prepared by Van Tuyl Surveyors was previously submitted in conjunction with the approvals for Hillcrest Estates - Section One. We would request that the Board utilize those maps on this application. We believe that the road and drainage work on Section Two has been substantially completed. Additionally, electric and telephone lines have been installed. We have made arrangements for a letter of credit to be furnished to the Planning Board to assure the completion of the remaining work, if any, for roads, drainage and/or utilities. We have requested that our engineers, Young & Young, examine the site and provide an estimate of the completion costs of the requisite site work for purposes of establishing the amount of the bond. Their report should be completed within ten (10) days. Furthermore, we are preparing a draft agreement of the Homeowners Association which will be submitted for approval of the Board. We propose to deed to the Homeowners Association all roads, parks and recreation areas. As the Board may readily conclude, we have to date expended substantial monies in conjunction with the completion of this application. We remain committed to proceeding with the remaining open items as expeditiously as possible. We therefore beg this Board' s indulgence by granting a further adjournment of the subject application. We wish to thank you for your anticipated courtesies. r truly yours, BK:df BEN KI LER enc. 1'4-16-2 (X2191)-7c 617.21 SEOR Appendix A State Environmental Ouality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full LAI is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible, impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Par( 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if differo r *iJeWfi r) 111[11 Date MAR 2 81994 1 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional " information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Streal Address,Municipality and County) Heath Drive, Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Young and Young, Land Surveyors ) 5161 727-2303 ADDRESS 400 Ostrander Avenue CI T YIPO STATE ZIP CODE Riverhead N. 1 11901 NAME OF OWNER III dlllerant) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Harold Reese, Jr. , and others ( 5161 593-5200 ADDRESS 855 Sunrise Highway CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Lynbrook N.Y. 11563 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Residential Subdivision - 20 Lots Map of Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 Prepared by Young and Young, last dated March 21, 1994 Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A: Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) r611ural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 22.9 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFT R COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 12.9 acres �.6 acres Forested Woodland A n acres 4 2 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 acres 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0 acres 0 acres Water Surface Area n acres n acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Cl iff & Beach 2.0 acres 2.0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0acres 3.3 acres Other (Indicate type) Lawns & Landscape T acres — — acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? HaB, HaA, RdA, MfB & MfC a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained 70 % of site ®Moderately well drained 0 % of site ®Poorly drained _0— % of site b. If any agricultural land is invol NdA how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? / acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4 Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Dyes NNo a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet) 2. 5 Appfos:mate percentage of proposer.9ecl site with slopes: _`0•I-0%, _ 74.• ?o .10 15,° 20 _9� Or grealcf 6 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Dyes PNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? =,Yes XNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0_10n' in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? K]Yes ❑No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes 6No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes K]No According to Young and Young Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ®Yes ❑No Describe (1 if{c and Rparh 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes X3No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? WYes ❑No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Long Island Sound b. Size (In acres) N/A 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? byes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? QtYes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? []Yes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes K3No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes 1XNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes QNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 92-9 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 22.9 acres initially; 22.9 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %: I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 40 C. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 6 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 20 Ultimately 20 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure —5_ height; 40 width: —80— length. j Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N/A ft. 3 2 How much natural material (i.t• -ack, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? dyes ONO ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intend .,. purpose is the site being reclaimed? Residential Development b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? (Ayes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ( Yes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 10.1 acres. S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes [IN0 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 36 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N.A. a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONO ti. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes 60No 9. Number of As generated: during construction 50 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes ONO If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes bNO a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Mes ONO Type Sanitary 1.1. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes CONo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? byes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? IK)Yes ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month 3.6 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? INYes ONO c. If yes, give name Southold Landfill ; location Cutchogue d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Oyes ❑No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes ONO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? (NYes ONO Lawn Care 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes NO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Oyes )ONO 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? KJYes ONO If yes , indicate type(s) Electric 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 6000 gallons/day. 2.1. Does project involve Local, Slate or Federal funding? Dyes WNo If Yes, explain 4 2S. Appussa:> Requ. eJ: submittal Type Dale Cas. Town. \ ii;..ge board ...Yes :�No Eitl- lowu. 'Hfarc Planning uoard ).jyes LINO Subdivision 1986 City. Town Zoning float'! �- Yes QINO -C+W. Count% lieallh Department Eyes ONO Sanitary Disposal & Water Supply 1986 Other Local Agencies LYes ONO Other Regional Agencies S.C. Plan. ❑Yes ONO Subdivision State Agencies NYSDEC C011111l. Byes ONO Subdivision� virion (Tidal Wetlands) federal Agencies ❑Yes O1No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? L]Yes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: !,zoning amendnsent ❑coning variance ❑special use permit [))subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of tile. site( "A" Residential._-.. Agricultural 1. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zonings 20 lots •I. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A y 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans) IMYes ONO 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a /, mile radius of proposed action? Residential - "A" Residential - Agricultural U Is the proposed action compatible wills adjoininglsurrounding land uses within a '/. mile? .Qyes ONO 9 11 the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 20 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 40,000 10 Will proposed action require any authorizations) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes WNo Tl . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, lire protection)? ([lyes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? NYes ONO 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels?, Dyes CdNo A. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffict Dyes ONO D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal• please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. f E. Verification I certify that the information provided above'is true to the best of my knowledge. Anphrrrn!Sponsr�Namee Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Date 03/22/94 signature & "'-`=J /mac P�,t Title Professional Engineer If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a slate agency, complete the Coastal Assessmenl Form before proceeding nigh this assessment. 5 Part 2—PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. Out, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO DYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyer)off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ' ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ [--]Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 6. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ El Yes 1-1 No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix 0.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes EJ No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes E]No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13, Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO OYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 9 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation Systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ONO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17, Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the.event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No form 0.etoxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or o(her disturbance. ❑ ❑ El Yes El NO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid.or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 10 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 10. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 19. Is there., or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ❑NO ❑YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 Orient Fire District WS ORIENT, LONG ISLAND r NEW YORK "957 /99l o e � 0&/V,7� Yi L--e.- .Z4 D 0 MAR 2 5 1994 $DUTNOLDTOWN PLANNING DOARD V 1234567896123456 ADCDEFGHIJKL31NOP • PO1 CASO[A WELL [TILLERS, INC . 1408 M4?NTAUK HIGHWAY - MASnC. l.I.. N.Y.. 11950 Telephone: IS454 (keo Code S16) Fax- 5 6-291-0349 ATE: March 24 , 1994 ^.). Melissa Spiro FAX: 765 -3136 ME:ccAGE= Here is the letter, to Confirm the telephone conver14 _-- you had w.i�h NIS MESSAGE WILL CONSIST OF two PAGES. ( INCLUDING CHIS COVER PAGE) PLEASE CONTACT THIS OFFI('i IMMEDIATELY IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE: ALA, THE PAGES! ! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION IN THIS MATTER. FRS: Danielle -:ASOLA WELL DRILLERS_ MAR 2 4 1994 SOUTHOLDTOWN PLANNING DOARD CASOI A WELL DRILLERS, INC. Ms 1408 MONTAUK HIGHWAY • MASTIC,LL, N,Y, 11950 Tebphom:281-64U(Area Code 516) March 24 , 1994 Town Planning Board Fax: 765-31 :16 Att: Melissa Spiro RE: Firewells in the Harold Reese 11illcrest Subdivision Dear Ms . Spiro: This is to confirm our telephone conversation. Mr. Reese had employed us approximately two months ago to install two 8" farewells in the Hillt;re6L Subdivision. Normally this job would be completed in several weeks, but at this site we chose to drive test wells to be sure the 385 gallon per minute capacity Would be attainable. This proved to be a wise declsiun, since we ran a test hole down to 207 ' , and found no strata that would produce the required capacity. We explained the situation to Mr. Andy Ruroede, one of the Fire Commissioners, who at a subsequent meeting, got the approval of the Board of Commissioners to have Mr. Reese install 10,000 qallon storage tanks in place of firewells. He also explained to me that a letter confirming this would be sent to Mr. Reese and the Planning Board. We are now under contract to install these tanks, and we think that we will be able to have the units in the ground about April 7th, and be completed Within a week or so thereafter. We hope this note helps you to see that Mr. Reese, as well as ourselves , are doing all we can to complete these jobs as soon as possible. Sincerely, � �� Robert 1''. Casola President CASOLA WELL DR.IT.T,1£RS, INC. D R R M D f RC/dd MAR 2 4 1994 --- ------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Etter i1ros. fnr. 855 SUNRISE HIGHWAY LYNBROOK,N.Y. 1 1 563 516-583-5200 March 18 , 1994 Mr. Richard Ward Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 RE : Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM # 1000-13-2-8 . 2 v� Dear Mr. Ward; Enclosed is our check # 1203 for $400 .00, your review fee for the environmental consultant on the above captioned application. I Submit your immediate attention to this matter and seek your cooperation in expediting his process . Any questions can be directed to my office at 593-5200. Very truly ours , Harold Reese Jr . President HR :cc 0 cc: Ben Kinzler attorney MM 2 21994 Ken Abruzzo, Young & Young certified mail RRR PQW P 848 936 843 March 17, 1994 Ms. Melissa Spiro SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Town Hall Southold NY 11971 Dear Melissa, I am writing to inform you of what could be a significant Indian artifact find. On March 16th, 1994, parts of what appear to be a large stone mortar, at least 3 feet in circumference, was found at Hillcrest Estates by amateur archaeologist, Steve Voegelin. It was unearthed by one of the bulldozers clearing away the woods. Several smaller tools were also found in the same pile of dirt. Since they are excavating and drilling wells at this time, I thought it most urgent that I inform you of this find. It has been established that there was a settlement on the site of what is now Brown's Hills, which is adjacent to Hillcrest. I do not believe it is too much of a stretch to assume that the settlement was large enough) to include Hillcrest. I hope that an archaeological investigation can be made before more valuable artifacts are lost. Sincerely, Mary Mul by _-- ".,., POB 545 Greenport NY 11944 477-9413 (member of the Southold Indian Museum) � 0 erg. MR18 1D i SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD E tJ k. :C FI L E i-. ty r T' BEN k{XN21.[ilt Ats nil-ORNEY Al1 AW NH K I')It.14N leovLVV,141) Ku1TF :no ON IT Ngxk• Nk:n Y<)IkK IIII_1 0,400 muu aHu N:u k) PAX h10.402-_740 DEBORAH Bern AAHN March 7 , 1994 Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold New York 11971 D D Re: Hillcrest Estates Section Two 81 East Marion, New York 994 SCTN #1000 O_Aw I RD Dear Chairman Ward: As the Board is aware-, our clients have actively pursued the subject application for some time. In particular, we have regularly reported to the Board our efforts to secure approvals from the Suffolk County HEalth Department. Numerous initial wator samples failed to meet with Board of Health approval . As a re!:ult, my clients have met with the Board of Health and have agreed to drill wells on each of the twenty lots in the proposed subdivision and to then test water samples from each lot. The Board of Hoalth has agreed to approve any ]lot upon which the test results meet their drinking water standards. Their agreement would be conditioned upon a reciprocal agreement by our clients to covenant not to develop any lot upon which drinking water standards fail at this time to comply with their minimum requirements. Such a covenant would remain in effect as to each failed lot until such time as test results establish that drinking water on the lot Complies with the minimum standards. In furtherance of that agreement, we have undertaken to drill wells on each of the twenty lots and have to date completed seven additional wells. Thus, in addition to the three initial test wells, there are now ten wells drilled on the site. The seven new wells were installed at a cost in excess of $25, 000. 00. New drilling, however, has been severely hampered and delayed as a result of a number of factors, most significant of which has been the recent significant snow storms . It is now apparent that delays in the installation of these wells will preclude compliance with the Planning Board' s deadline of March 28 , 1994 . There remains to be drilled, ten additional - 91i MGN 1 6 1 1 BEN K I NcLER i Page 2 Richard G. Ward, Chairman March 7 , 1994 wells after which water samples must be tested by the Board of edincluding, but not limited to, Health and then approvals securwhich fail to meet drinking water approval of covenants ort lots standards. In light of the foregoing , and given the enormous in of time and money which our clients have already made on the grantctaddiitionalontime andel that a f final request hearing abetr�further adjourned. I understand from our hydrogeologist, Mr. Paul C9ro£ the ser, that completion of the wells e testing gofa Health nd cwillnre:quire a application and covenants by minimum of an additional ,ixtY to ninety days. It is my further understanding that there remains a few ps-eted on the subject application additional items to be comthe installation of fire wells including, but not limitedt� installation as Well Pthe and/or the posting of a band for sucf nal road and drainage aplans issues pertaining to road ownership, ed and any outstanding inspection feescwhich also bel believe be that with the Board. In respect to those items, I can complete them within the next thirty days. I very much appreciate Your past courtesies and I loo , willabe to attending your meeting of March 7 , 1994 at which UrmYeC;uestfor pleased to provide the Soard with details regarding an adjournment. Very truly yours, BE KINZ BK:df PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS I - � Richard G.Ward, Chairman i x Town Hall,53095 Main Road r. P. O. Box 1179 George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. , Mark S. McDonald �( (y, Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards tic Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 8, 1994 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 .2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, March 7, 1994 : BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board continue to hold the final hearing open for an additional time period to expire at the Planning Board' s March 28, 1994 meeting. This is the final extension that the Planning Board will be granting for this subdivision. Please refer to the Planning Board' s letter of February 3, 1994 for outstanding items yet to be completed. Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Sincerely, / Richard G. Ward 4#5 Chairman cc : Harold Reese, Jr. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS z Richard G.Ward, Chairman 7 V Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. j ) ' y P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. ,N Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards V' u �"� Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ,•abruary 15, 1994 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, February 14, 1994 : Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board continue to hold the final hearing open for an additional time period to expire at the Planning Board' s March 28 , 1994 meeting. This is the final extension that the Planning Board will be granting for this subdivision. Please refer to the Planning Board' s letter of February 3 , 1994 for outstanding items yet to be completed. Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Since//rely, / V G�� a vj Richard G. Ward S Chairman cc: Harold Reese, Jr. B1'.N KIN'l.Lb]K P� A'P'I,lIt NI'.V AS I.AW 41 n.1,M111.I2UAO r J 41141:Al NY.r'd(. NFW YC)RK I1oL1'11:11 301 VAX 414'4" 0749 Ill,41W 63(Xi January 28, 1994 ULLIUIW:tlKTN MMN - Planning Board Office Town of Southold `Town Hall, 53095 Main Ro.nd F P. 0. Box 1179 -� 7 Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Richard G. W.+rd, Chairman : . Re: Hillcrest Estates Section Two tl East Marion, New York f SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Ward: Confirming my conversation today with Melissa Spiro of your office and to further my client' s application with the Board on January 17 , 1994 , I wish to advise the Board that we continue to actively pursue our application for approval of the above subdivision. Two new test wells have been drilled at the subject premises. The two new wells together with one of the prior wells were then retested under the supervision of Paul Grossman. Mr. Grossman has just reported that the two new wells meet all requirements of the Board of Health. The third well however, revealed nitrate levels of 1 . 1 or 1% over the Health Department limits of 1. 0. Additionally, the test on that well revealed the presence of a new pesticide doctal in excess of the Health Department Limits. We expect to meet with representatives of th.e Health Department within the next two weeks in order that we may seek a determination as to their position in this matter on the application. .JAN 2 8 In the interim, we would respectfully request your continued courtesy and cooperation in granting a further adjournment of our application in order that we may complete the matter pending with the Board of Health. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. Very truly yours, BK:tml Ben Kinzler r xrg r £�g M -55F F _u o�osOFFOCK�oGy h� 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y = SCOTT L. HARRIS Richard G.Wald, Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham,Jr. �t7,( Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski.Jr. P. O.Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold,New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax IS 16)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 3, 1994 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, January 31, 1994 : Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board continue to hold the final hearing open for an additional time period to expire at the Planning Board' s March 28, 1994 meeting. This is the final extension that the Planning Board will be granting for this subdivision. All outstanding items, as listed below, must be completed within the specified time frame: 1. Health Department approval must be obtained; 2 . The required firewells must be installed, or a bond for such installation must be submitted to, and accepted by, the Town; 3 . All items listed in the Board' s December 21, 1992 correspondence must be both complied with, and finalized. 4 . Issues pertaining to road ownership, final road and drainage plans, and any outstanding inspection fees must be addressed and resolved within the time period. If the above mentioned time frame is not met, the final hearing will not be continued. If the hearing is not continued and your client wishes to proceed with the proposed subdivision, the submission of a new application will be required. Hillcrest Estates Section Two February 3 , 1994 Page 2 Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Sincerely, � Richard G. Ward 4115 Chairman enc. cc: Harold Reese, Jr. a t: -c , PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �t, r,'7- ") "`9�C Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward `ftp j Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa, Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 21, 1992 - 'Ren Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM$1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: On November 18 , 1992, Ken Abruzzo met with Melissa Spiro of this office to review the status of the above mentioned subdivision. He told Ms. Spiro that he is preparing revised maps to be submitted to the Suffolk County Health Department. Two or three lots will be eliminated in order to provide additional acreage for a water facility for the subdivision. Mr. Abruzzo asked if the Planning Board would notify him of any additional information that must be shown on the map. The following information is required: 1. The topography must be shown at 2' intervals. 2. The bluff line and the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area must be indicated on the map. 3 . Building envelopes must be shown for all sound front lots. 4 . The Planning Board will be proceeding with the SEQRA review for Section Two upon submission of the revised maps. However, the Long Environmental Assessment Form must be revised to reflect the changes that will be made to the subdivision map. Page 2 ' Hillcrest Estates, Section Two In addition, the Planning Board will be referring the Long Environmental Assessment Form to their Environmental Consultant for review. Your client will be responsible for submitting the $400. 00 review fee before the Planning Board will authorize its consultant to proceed with the review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr.� ; Chairman cc: Joseph J. Lizewski, Chair, Groundwater Resource Committee Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Harold Reese, Jr. , Applicant Ken Abruzzo, Young and Young rS. geese +?tiros. fnr. Ins 055 SUNRISE HIGHWAY LYNBROOK.N.Y. 11563 516-593-5200 January 17 , 1994 Mr . Richard G. Ward Chairman Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold , N.Y. 11971 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section II East Marion, New York SCTM # 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Ward; Over the past several months we have been aggressively pursuing the Health Department ' s approval on the above captioned property. I have sent you during this time correspondence relating to this effort. As I indicated in my last memo. I 'm trying to get a meeting together with Mr. Trent of the Health Department to resolve and get approval on the issues . In as much as I 'm not certain as to exactly when this meeting will take place , I respectively seek your patience and understanding to hold the hearing open on this project . I will inform the board as to my progress once the meeting with the Health Department is completed. Very ruly y urs , h Harold Reese Jr . President cc: Ben Kinzler Paul Grosser HR:cc lHeese igros. fur. 855 SUNRISE HIGHWAY LYNBROOK.N.Y. 1 1 563 515-583-5200 January 13 , 1994 Mr. Marty Trent Suffolk County Health Services 255 Rabro Drive Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section II Dear Mr. Trent; Enclosed please find a check for $1 , 500.00 your fees for the testing of three wells on the above captioned development . Mr . Paul Grosser will be contacting you direct to set up a meeting for discussion and approval of this project . I 'm looking forward to our meeting before the end of January. Any questions please call me at my office . Ve truly our Harold Reese Jr . President HR:cc cc: BEN KINZLER PAUL GROSSER RICHARD WARD IAN1g 1 ' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Richard G. Wand, Chairman 7 A George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Town Hall, 53095 P.O. Box Main n Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Mark S. McDonald Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax Is 16)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 11, 1994 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13=2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, January 10, 1994: Be it RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. As requested in the Board' s October 26 correspondence, please notify the Board, in writing, prior to the Board' s January 31, 1994 meeting, as to the status of the application before the Health Department in order for the Board to determine whether or not to continue holding the hearing open. Your written response must be received no later than noon of the Friday prior to the meeting date. Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Sincerely, / &4G/tiJ'-/-Yl/ e�xovy Richard G. Ward 1n5 Chairman cc: Harold Reese, Jr. ,WNW 511gLE 14tst NCOS. frit. p MS M4-2K Mr �l 955 SUNRISE HIGHWAY LYNBROOK,N.Y. 11593 516-593-5200 December 20, 1993 Mr. Richard Ward Chairman Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Ward; Enclosed is a copy of a letter sent to Suffolk County Board of Health concerning our progress on Hillcrest Estates sec II . As indicated we are awaiting their confirmation of acceptable drinking water . I 'm cautiously optimistic that this can be completed before your January meeting. I ' ll keep you and your board advised. Have a nice Holiday . Ver truly our , Harold Reese Jr . President cc: Ben Kinzler Esq. HR:cc DEC 2 7 i: 3 ` �.iUA LITY • PROFESSIONALISM • SERVICE' P.W. GROSSER CONSULTING ENGINEER & HYDROGEOLOGIST, P.C. P.O. BOX 39 SAYVILLE. N.Y. 11782 0039 (516) 5896353 FAX (516) 5695705 December 16, 1993 Mr. Peter Akras, P.E. Suffolk County Department of Health Services Bureau of Wastewater Management Suffolk County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Hill Crest Estates, Sect. 2 T/O Southold, New York H. S. Ref. No. : 823 Dear Mr. Akras: As you may remember, Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 is a proposed subdivision of 20 lots on a parcel of 22 . 9 acres in total area. The average lot size is 42, 800 sq. ft. and a one half acre park area has been set aside on the Sound. The subdivision is located in Orient, north of Main Rd. on the extension of Heath drive with three lots fronting on L. I. Sound. The site is primarily wooded with up to a 100 foot high bluff on the Sound dropping to the beach. This subdivision is an extension of Hill Crest Estates Section 1 which is adjacent to this site on both the south and west and also has lots fronting on L. I . Sound. Hill Crest Estates Section 1 is an approved subdivision and several homes have been built on its lots. In a letter dated April 24, 1991 we provided a description of the subdivision, an evaluation of the water resources and the water quality results from test wells. Test wells 1 and 2 only had 25 feet of fresh water in them and test wells 2 and 3 had concentrations of aldicarb in excess of standards in 1988 . Due to poor water bearing strata no attempt had been made to advance wells 1 and 2 more than 25 feet into water. After discussions with Dennis Moran, P. E. it was decided to resample these wells, since the data was old, and reevaluate the results. These three wells were resampled on May 4 , 1993 . The laboratory analyses for these wells are attached as exhibits 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Wells 2 and 3 at this time met drinking , water standards, while well 1 was above the standards for only aldicarb. In order to improve upon the water quality and try to obtain forty feet of water in all the wells, two new test wells were P.W. GROSSER CONSULTING • drilled. New test well no. 1 is located in the southwest corner of lot 35 and new test well no. 2 is located in the southern portion of lot 43 . It has been reported to us from Casola Well Drillers that each new test well is 80 feet deep with 20 feet of screen. This provides approximately forty feet of water in each of these wells. Water quality samples were obtained from these wells on September 14 , 1993 . The water quality data for well no. 1 (Exhibit 4) showed that the water met drinking water standards except for iron and zinc, aldicarb was not detected. The water quality data for well no. 2 (Exhibit 5) showed that the water met drinking water standards for all compounds tested and aldicarb was not detected. Our opinion was that the iron and zinc found in test well no. 1 may have come from the galvanized well casing used and this well was resampled for iron and zinc. Upon resampling, the iron and zinc concentrations (see Exhibit 6) met the drinking water standards. We request that the Suffolk County Department of Health Services schedule to sample these test wells with Casola Well Drillers as soon as possible. If your water quality samples are consistent with ours, we request that the subdivision be approved with on site wells and septic systems. Please call if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further. V y truly ours, Paul W. Grosser, Ph.D. ,P. E. President cc: Mr. Harold Reese Benjamin Kinzler, Esq. Mr. Robert Casola Mr. Dennis Moran, P.E. EMMST LABORATORIES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 377 SHEFFIELD AVE. • N. BABYLON, N.Y. 11703 • (516) 422-5777• FAX (516) 422-5770 EXHIBIT I LAB NO. C931825/1 05/17/93 P. W. Grosser Consulting P. O. Box. 39 Sayville, NY 11782 ATTN: Paul Grosser SOURCE OF SAMPLE: HAR9301 COLLECTED BY : Client DATE COL'D:Q)5/09/93 RECEIVEI):05/04/9,.7 SAMPLE: Water sample, TWO1, groundwater ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS T. Coliform, 100 mL Absent Aldicarb ug/L <0. 5 Chloride as Cl mg/L 26 Aldicarb sultane ug/L 10 Iron as Fe mg/L 2. 0 Aldicarto sultoxide ug/L 8. 3 Nitrate as N mg/L 8. 3 PH units 6. 0 MBAS as LAS mg/L <0. 1 Manganese as Mn mg/L <0. 02 ce. REMARKS: DIREC:TOR______ rn= 7852 NYSDOH IDM 10320 GCO■EST LABORATORIES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING EXHIBIT 2 377 SHEFFIELD AVE. • N. BABYLON, N.Y. 11703 (516) 422.5777• FAX (516) 422-5770 LAB HO. C931825/2 05/17/93 P. W. Grosser Consulting P. O. Box. 39 Sayville, NY 11782 ATTN: Paul Grosser SOURCE OF SAMPLE: HAR9301 C:OLLECTEI> BY : Client DATE COL'D:05/04/93 RECEIVED:05/04/93 SAMPLE: Water sample, TW82, groundwater ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS T. Coliform, 100 mL Absent Aldicart, ug/L <0. 5 Chloride as C1 mg/L 29 Aldicarb sulfone ug/L <0. 8 Iron as Fe mg/L 0. 06 Aldicarh sulfoxide ug/L <0. 5 Nitrate as N mg/L 13 pH units 6. 8 MBAS as LAS mg/L <0. 1 Manganese as Mn mg/L <0. 02 cc: REMARKS: 1-4--- DI REC;TOR___ rn= 7853 NYSDOH IDA 10320 ff CCO■EST LABORATORIES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 377 SHEFFIELD AVE. • N. BABYLON, N.Y. 11703 • (516) 422-5777• FAX (516) 422-5770 EXHIBIT 3 LAB NO. C931825/3 05/17/93 P. W. Grosser Consulting P. O. Box 39 Sayville, NY 11782 ATTN: Paul Grosser SOURCE OF SAMPLE: HAR9301 COLLECTED BY : Client DATE COL'D:05/04/93 RECEIVED:05/04/93 SAMPLE: Water sample, TW*3, groundwater ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS T. Coliform, 100 mL Absent Aldicart, ug/L <0. 5 Chloride as Cl mg/L 30 Aldicart, sulfone ug/L 2. 0 Iron as Fe mg/L 0. 12 Aldicarb sulfoxide ug/L 1. 8 Nitrate as N mg/L 9. 6 PH units 6. 4 MBAS as LAS mg/L <0. 1 Manganese as Mn mg/L <0. 02 CC: REMARKS: UIRECTOk__ _ _ _ ___________ rn= 7854 NYSDOH ID# 10320 L281 LABS 575 Broad lblloa Read. Melville. N.Y. 11717 � INS� (516)69/-7040 FA%:(516)6944122 LAB NO: 9328995 • EXHIBIT 4 Is HARRY GOLDMAN WATER ANALYSIS TYPE. . . . . . POTABLE WATER MAIN RD - ROUTINE MATTITUCK, NY 11952 ORIGIN. . . . WELL WELL TYPE. DATE COLLECTED. 09/14/93 POINT NO: DATE RECEIVED. . 09/15/93 LOCATION: P.W. GROSSER CONSULTING COLLECTED BY. . . D99 SOUNDVIEW & HEATH DR. ,ORIENT PROJECT NO. . . . . 11 REMARKS: SOURCE:TW#I/FLOW:10 GPM/WR:15 MIN PARAMETER (S) RESULTS UNITS LIMIT TOTAL COLIFORM BACT. negative ----- negative E. COLI. absent ----- absent CHLORIDE 25 mg/l 250 SPECIFIC CONDUCTIVITY 211 umhos COPPER 0.07 mg/l [1.3] * IRON *1.7 mg/l 0.30 DETERGENTS (MBAS) <0.04 mg/l MANGANESE 0.05 mg/1 0. 30 AMMONIA (NH3) <0.02 mg/1 NITRATE (AS N) 5. 3 mg/l 10.0 LEAD <1.0 ug/1 (15.0 ] PH 7.9 units • ZINC *5.8 mg/1 5.0 2 - Result(s) marked * exceed(s) NEW YORK STATE limits for potable water. - Result(s) Reported meet(s) (USEPA action level] for potable water. COPIES TO: DATE ISSUED 09/17/93 ABORATORY DIRECTOR ORIGINAL - ��u�• as aroaa 040 �maa,ANetrine, N.Y.-11747 maa (sis)cv4- FAX:(516)694-4E22 LAB NO: 9329031 HARRY GOLDMAN WATER ANALYSIS• TYPE. . . . . . ALE WATER MAIN RD ROUTINE MATTITUCK, NT 11952 ORIGIN. . . . WELL WELL TYPE. DATE COLLECTED. 09/14/93 POINT NO: DATE RECEIVEI). . 09/15/93 LOCATION: P.W. GROSSER CONSULTING COLLECTED BY.. . . CUST SOUNDVIEW 6 HEATH DR. ,ORIENT PROJECT NO. . . . . 33 REMARKS: SOURCE:TW#1/FLOW:10 GPM/WR:15 MIN TOTAL ALDICARB - ( uq/l ) PARAMETER (S) RESULT LIMIT PARAMETER (S) RESULT LIMIT ALDICARB SULFONE <1 ALDICARB SULFOKIDE <1 ALDICARB <1 - TOTAL ALDICARBS <3 - Result(s) Reported meet(s) NEW YORK STATE 1.imits for potable water. COPIES TO: DATE ISSUED 09/24/93 'DATE RUN. . . . . . . 09/23/93 DATE REPORTED. . 09/24/93 ` R ECTOR ORI(iINAt IH2M LA WC 5 5 04„a , �, ; , � � (516)694700 Fax:(ste) LAB N0: 9328996 EXHIBIT 5 HARRY GOLDMAN WATER ANALYSIS TYPE. . . . . . POTABLE WATER MAIN RD ROUTINE MATTITUCK, NY 11952 ORIGIN. . . . WELL WELL TYPE. DATE COLLECTED. 09/14/93 POINT NO: DATE RECEIVED. . 09/15/93 LOCATION: P.W. GROSSER CONSULTING COLLECTED BY. . . D99 SOUNDVIEW DR. ,ORIENT PROJECT NO. . . . . 12 REMARKS: SOURCE:TW#2/FLOW:10 GPM/WR:15 MIN PARAMETER (S) RESULTS UNITS LIMIT TOTAL COLIFORM BACT. negative ----- negative E. COLI. absent ----- absent CHLORIDE 57 mg/l 250 SPECIFIC CONDUCTIVITY 538 umhos COPPER <0.02 mg/l [1.3] IRON 0.08 mg/l 0.30 DETERGENTS (MBAS) <0.04 mg/l MANGANESE 0.02 mg/l 0.30 AMMONIA (NH3) <0.02 mg/1 NITRATE (AS N) 8. 4 mg/l 10.0 LEAD <1.0 ug/L [15.0] PH 7.6 units ZINC 0.26 mg/l 5.0 - Result(s) Reported meet(s) NEW YORK STATE limits for potable water. - Result(s) Reported meet(s) [USEPA action level] for potable water . COPIES TO: DATE ISSUED 09/17/93 ABORATORY DIRECTOR ORIGINAL UUU U if e� LAU� 6%co 575 Brood 040 Road, X:15111 11747 � , IL/�, ' (516)694-7040 FAI:(516) 122 LAB NO: 9329032 HARRY GOLDMAN WATER ANALYSIS TYPE. . . . . . POTABLE WATER MAIN RD ROUTINE MATTITUCK, NY 11952 ORIGIN. . . . WELL WELL TYPE. DATE COLLECTED. 09/14/93 POINT NO: DATE RECEIVED. . 09/15/93 LOCATION: P.W. GROSSER CONSULTING COLLECTED BY. . . CUST SOUNDVIEW DR. ,ORIENT PROJECT NO. . . . . 34 REMARKS: SOURCE:TW#2/FLOW:10 GPM/WR:15 MIN TOTAL ALDICARB - ( ug/1 ) PARAMETER (S) RESULT LIMIT PARAMETER (S) RESULT LIMIT ALDICARB SULFONE <1 ALDICARB SULFOXIDE <1 ALDICARB <1 TOTAL ALDICARBS <3 Result(s) Reported meet(s) NEW YORK STAT£ limits for potable water. COPIES TO: DATE ISSUED 09/24/93 .DATE-RUN. . . . . . . 09/23/93 DATE REPORTED. . 09/24/93 ,l ECTOR ORIGINAL Nel. 575 Brod Pnd111eN.Y. 11747IH2M LAUS, 6%co (516)694-7G40 AX:(516)69�22 LAB NO: 9336445 EXHIBIT 6 HARRY GOLDMAN WATER ANALYSIS TYPE. . . . . . POTABLE WATER MAIN RD ROUTINE MATTITUCK, NY 11952 ORIGIN. . . . WELL WELL TYPE. RAW DATE COLLECTED. 11/24/93 POINT NO: DATE RECEIVED. . 11/24/93 LOCATION: CASOLA WELL DRILLERS COLLECTED BY. . . CUST HILLCREST EST. , ORIENT PROJECT NO. . . . . 36 REMARKS: SOURCE (TW#4) FLOW-10GPM WR1 HR. (REF. REESE)LOT 35 PARAMETER (S) RESULTS UNITS LIMIT IRON U.02 mg/l 0.30 ZINC 0.26 mg/l 5.0 Result(s) Reported meet(s) NEW YORK STATE limits for potable water. DATE ISSUED 11.26/9 COPIES TO: (^� ECTO ORIGINAL PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS a Richard G. Wald, Chairman ��„ ` ,`�� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Main Town Hall, 53095 Mn Road _ Mark S. McDonald "`""' P. O. Box 1179 Mai Kenneth L. Edwards Southold,New York 11971 Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Pax(516) 765 - 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 14, 1993 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM4 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 14, 1993 : Be it RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. As requested in the Board' s October 26 correspondence, please notify the Board, in writing, prior to the Board' s January 31, 1994 meeting, as to the status of the application before the Health Department in order for the Board to determine whether or not to continue holding the hearing open. Your written response must be received no later than noon of the Friday prior to the meeting date. Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Sincerely Richard G. War rill Chairman cc: Harold Reese, Jr. � 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Richard G.Ward, Chairman7; Supervisor syr George Ben Ritchie Lathamwsid,Jr.Jr. "71 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,J � � :1 Mark S. McDonald _"` P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516) 765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 16, 1993 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, November 15, 1993 : Be it RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. As requested in the Board' s October 26 correspondence, please notify the Board, in writing, prior to the Board' s January 31, 1994 meeting, as to the status of the application before the Health Department in order for the Board to determine whether or not to continue holding the hearing open. Your written response must be received no later than noon of the Friday prior to the meeting date. Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Siflcerely, iahard G. and Chairman cc: Harold Reese, Jr. t fill MAIN ONCE: CASOLA WELL DRILLERS, INC. 1706 Noorrtth Highwayy 1408 Montauk Highway WELLS—PUMPS—TANKS— FMTERS SOUTHAMPTON,NY 1968 MASTIC, NEW YORK 11950 INSTALLATION— SERVICE— REPi MS Phone 283-5553 Phone 281-5454 EAST HAMPTON Phone 329-0808 PROPOSAL $OBMItTED TO PHONE DATE -- STREET Harold Reese 593-5200 October 14 , 1993 JOB NAME -- _ 855 Sunrise Highway Hillcrest Estates CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE lDa LOCPTION -- Lynbrook, NY 11563 Soundview Drive Orient SUBMITTED BY: DATF OF PLAM1'S _ JOB PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for - .. 1 8" Fire Well; up to 901 deep. 1C( 2 61 1 - 8" x 30 , stainless steel wirewound well screen. Capacity to be 350 gallons per minute and shall be sand free. 1 - 15 HP submersible pump. Discharge tee and fire well fittings to conform to specifications. MATERIAL AND LABOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,885 .00 Well depth, ± $38 .00 per foot. NOTE: Please keep in mind that the DEC permit to install the pump will take at least two months to receive, so schedule the work accordingly. IF ACCEPTED, PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN TOP COPY! ! UP1'II}TpSP hereby to furnish material and labor — Complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: TEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTY FIVE. . . . . . . " . . . . ,'=dollars($ 10 �88 Payment to be mads;as fellows' —' 5 •00 I 1/z down upon signing of contract. Balance upon completion of job. All m rlal 19 W rmnt99d to by ills flPy.g991M1Allation MM.All Y k N by complgtW in, ,ommanllkq mmwAMnIMq W sb MPrpotkwN Any wwftlan or d""r horn allow gpp9ifNdtions InwNlno extra crab will ba esebpMtl only V w wHbn proem..no will becdnc an pxtrR pmrgp dror and above mq 9gtima[9.Al l darEIIrnmM poMingpnl vppn aMkaa.ppddRril9 p1.d.lays beyond our 90.Im1.Owner fa mny fA,tornado qnd olntt m.Cengry Mvraige.Our wIXltglp pTlVy cwcrM py WpkmLn 6 CompemrtiOn Irlgvranon TM`Pa^'99,yyM1m!nat Md i'Hu19 o11imMSIOn51dr II11eg4ew pn rola WnRicf 9ngll rp On0(1)yNr INETALMTbJN DATA'PVmpinP IIampment mutt b9IOEIIlfk In an 9wP lNM 2 dry,prolmtAd ggpinal aurtacc OwiMaaIIM llw¢inq,g,y epnrenMmy apq,aiblE br MNntmpnq Ark"Wlr. AUthOEl3ed TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO THE PUMP MOTOR Arv01pR ELECTRIC CONTROL3,in case ofaxrlou919,kin Signature _ Sly prpdypt 11161a1ky,q inp r9liaf yalxpupma IO rB19pollkoosHw Ipnk Plwy9yra bVli up,q c{III,r tlrairRr,Sump pump ar o1Mr PrpP9i beinapc System MygT be imbllRd. ' we N^I'gr W ggge�WI ANY ITEM OF VALUEIs Capt Myn,bayd am possiOW lVlvn flooMm. Note'Thi GSOLw WELL, eRatERg gNALL NOT eE uABLC FOR ANY CONSEOUEMIPL,INCIDENTAL oR S prop0881 may be CONTINGL'M CwmwGE3 WNp150EVER, withdrawn t)y us if n accepted within days. FaA�ILINOTOtCfOMPLY WITHTHEPBOVE RECOMMENDED INSiwtuTltlN DATA VOICa CUR WARRANTY. .LlrrpTYFlt(.Cp � �T��iq�Al—The above prices. speCillcabons and Conditions are satisfactory and are hereby aoeepted. You are authorized signature td do the work as spat I P `�• — _ nt wi{I be made a qutllove. — Date of Aceeptance: (1 (-f) signature Southold Town Planning So* 11 • October 25, 1993 Mr. Latham: Mr. Kinzler is here for Hillcrest Estates. Mr. Ward: OK, let's go to the hearing that was set for tonight, Hillcrest Estates - Section 2 - This major subdivision is for 20 lots on 22.9 acres located in Orient. SCTM# 1000-13-2-8.5. Ben Kinzler: Mr. Chairman, members of the Board, as we had reported at the last meeting that we attended at which this matter appeared before the Board, we had some difficulty with respect to an application before the Board of Health. Further to their denial of a variance application, we met with the Board and did agree to perform certain additional and further testing on the property. In order to perform the additional well testing, we have now, I believe copies may have been provided to the Board, we have performed certain additional testing. Paul Grosser, an engineer, directed testing through 1-12M labs. Two additional wells were dropped at the site and the results of the two wells have come back extremely well. The only problem being that one of the two wells tested for zinc, which is now a new and additional problem one that didn't apparently exist before. We've spoken with representatives of 1-12M and it is their belief, given the fact that no other well, including the prior wells at the site, have shown any evidence of zinc, that it's just a fluke, if you will, and they're in the process of retesting the well. It is our hope and certainly our belief that the well will come back favorably on a second test and this will allow us to return back to the Board of Health at which point we can secure a favorable approval from them. We would ask, given that fact, that this matter be adjourned. I'd also like to address a matter that Mr. Latham had requested at the last hearing. I'd like the Board to know that, of concern to the Board, and also of concern to us has been the installation of a firewell at the site. We've been chasing Mr. Casola for some time and Mr. Casola unfortunately is a very busy person, he has finally delivered to us a contract. We had executed a contract with him about a month ago for the installation of a firewell and we have asked him to proceed with the Installation of the firewell as expeditiously with all due and deliberate speed and it's our hope that he will do that. I have a copy of the contract. Mr. Ward: We'd appreciate having a copy for the file. Mr. Kinzler: I have a faxed copy, if the Board would like. Mr. Latham: Great news, great news. Mr. Kinzler: I knew that that would be of great interest and certainly a welcome... Mr. Ward: How many wells? Mr. Kinzler: Whatever the requisite wells were. Mr. Latham: There were two on that whole thing. Southold Town Planning Bo* 12 • October 25, 1993 Mr. Kinzler: Two? Mr. Ward: This gets one of them. Mr. Kinzler: OK, I was under the impression there was... Mr. Latham: Well, originally there were two on there and I don't think that's changed. Mr. Kinzler: Well I was under the impression there was one. We'll see that it's... Mr. Latham: Well it was old but it hasn't gone away. But this is the right stuff. Mr. Kinzler: I told Harold that if he didn't get it done I would be embarrassed to come out here. Mr. Latham: Is this Harold Jr.? Mr. Kinzler: Junior. Harold Sr. hasn't been all that well. Mr. Ward: What's the pleasure of the Board in terms of extension? Mr. Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to entertain a motion to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while the applicant continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Health Department. Mr. Ward: Is there a time that you're asking for at this point? Mr. Kinzler: I would think that certainly anything less than 90 days would probably be (inaudible) given the time that it's going to take to complete the testing, time to go back to the Board of Health. Mr. Ward: Alright, so can we amend the motion to that extent, 90 days? Mr. Edwards: So amended to 90 days. Mr. Latham: Second. (CHANGE TAPE) Mr. Kinzler: I had some difficulty in putting together, there had been some Issues that I didn't really want to air that were personal to ...we had apparently had resolved some issues and are in the process of completing the Board of Health issues with Cove Beach, and I thought that I had indicated last time, I didn't want to file the deeds unless and until the final applications were approved. Ms. Spiro: I was addressing the lot line change which had conditional approval subject to submission of the deeds. Mr. Kinzler: I was under the impression that we were not going to file the final deeds unless and until we had gotten a final approval on the subdivision. If that's not the pleasure of the Board, we will file them. Southold Town Planning Bo� 13 0 October 25, 1993 Mr. Ward: We assumed you were pursuing that. Mr. Kinzler: Would the Board object terribly if we filed it simultaneously with a final approval? Mr. Ward: The question Melissa's bringing up is the fact that the time table here just keeps dragging and dragging and we keep extending things, so if that's something that can just come to a head and do it, let's do it and not have it drag along. Mr. Kinzler: I'll take care of it. Thank you Mr. Chairman. Mr. Latham: One more thing as long as we're going back and forth to other...there's a subdivision of Mr. Reese's - Grand View Estates - you don't know about it? Mr. Kinzler: I don't have the pleasure of representing him on that. Mr. Latham: You might tell Mr. Reese, Jr. that there were two firewells supposedly put in down there - that was some years ago - we haven't seen any yet. Just as long as we're doing so well tonight. Mr. Kinzler: Mr. Reese, Sr. has not been well and taking care of his affairs in addition to taking care of the regular business has been very difficult. I beg the Board's indulgence. I can tell you on behalf of Mr. Reese, Sr., certainly on behalf of Mr. Reese, Jr. there's not been intentional... Mr. Latham: Just mention it anyway. Mr. Kinzler: I'll take care of it tomorrow. I was not aware of it. Mr. Latham: Thank you. Mr. Ward: Back to the motion that was on the table for the 90 day extension for Hillcrest Estates. There was a second to that, motion. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. any further business to come before the Board tonight, Mr. Latham? Mr. Latham: No, I have no further business. Mr. Ward: Mr. Orlowski? Mr. Orlowski: No. Mr. Ward: Mr. Edwards? Mr. Edwards: None. �i PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ° SCOTT L. HARRIS ✓' A' Richard G. Ward, Chairman %.i ,r.. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham,Jr. - Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski.Jr. - P. O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 26, 1993 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 .2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 25, 1993 : Be it RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Please notify the Board, in writing, prior to the Board's January 31, 1994 meeting, as to the status of the application before the Health Department in order for the Board to determine whether or not to continue holding the hearing open. Your written response must be received no later than noon of the Friday prior to the meeting date. At the meeting, you gave the Planning Board a copy of a contract your client has with Casola Well Drillers, Inc. , to install the firewells. Please note that two ( 2) firewells are required. Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Sincerely, I & W Ward Richard G. Chairman arf cc: Harold Reese, Jr. «vs - 1��1►tp ....,._. — .ac ., '4a'.;v.,...ins. • OUALITV • PROFESSIONALISM • SERVICE '<Z6F1cE P.W. GROSSER CONSULTING Al S A- I ENGINEER & HYDROGEOLOGIST, P.C. P.O. BOX 39 SAYVILLE, N.Y. 11762-0039 (516) 589-6353 FAX (516) 599-6705 October 20, 1993 Mr. Richard Ward Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Hillcrest Estates Section 2 Dear Mr. Ward: Please be informed that after consultation with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services two new test wells have been constructed at Hillcrest Estates Section 2 . Test Well If 1 is located on lot 35 at the southeast corner of Heath Drive and Sound View Drive. Test Well #2 is located on lot 43 on the north side of Sound View drive. Both wells were forty feet into water and met drinking water standards with the exception of Test Well #1 for iron and zinc (see attached lab sheets) . Due to the unusually high level of zinc in this water we are recommending that the well be resampled for iron and zinc. We are currently awaiting these results. Once these results are obtained we will be requesting final approval from the Department of Health Services. Please call if you have any questions. rau ul yours, 1 W. Grosser, Ph. . , . E. President PWG:cmc encl. cc: Mr. Harold Reese P OCT 2 ;egg (516)694-3040 ra:(sille.WLAB NO: 9328995 HARRY GOLDMAN WATER ANALYSIS TYPE. . . . . . POTABLE WATER MAIN RD ROUTINE MATTITUCK, NY 11952 ORIGIN. . . . WELL WELL TYPE. DATE COLLECTED. 09/14/93 POINT NO: DATE RECEIVED. . 09/15/93 LOCATION: P.W. GROSSER CONSULTING COLLECTED BY. . . D99 SOUNDVIEW b HEATH DR. ,ORIENT PROJECT NO. . . . . 11 REMARKS: SOURCE:TW$1/FLOW:10 GPM/WR:15 MIN RESULTS UNITS LIMIT TOTAL COLIFORM BACT. negative ----- negative E. COLI. absent ----- absent CHLORIDE 25 mg/l 250 SPECIFIC CONDUCTIVITY 211 umhos COPPER 0.07 mg/1 [1.3] * IRON *1.7 mg/l 0.30 DETERGENTS (MEAS) <0.04 mg ", MANGANESE 0.05 mq 0. 30 AMMONIA (NH3) <0.02 mg/ NITRATE. (AS N) 5. 3 mg/1 10 .0 LEAD <1 .0 ug/! ( 15.0) PH 7.9 units * ZINC *5.6 mg/l 5.0 2 - Result(s) markl3 • exceed(s) NEW YORK STATE limits : r potable water . - Result(s) Reported meet(s) [USEPA acc .nn level ] fur p,, abl ? COPIES TO: DATr ISSr'''Lj 09/17/93 -�AY .AGORA"'ORY DIRECTOR ORIGiNAi °� M L�I3S, 555 Broad Hallow �,St„ 1741SCe (516)694-3G40G10 Fll:(516)rYn1 LAB NO: 9328996 HARRY GOLDMAN WATER ANALYSIS TYPE. . . . . . POTABLE WATER MAIN RD ROUTINE MATPITUCK, NY 11952 ORIGIN. . . . WELL WELL TYPE. DATE COLLECTED. 09/14/93 POINT NO: DATE RECEIVED. . 09/15/93 LOCATION: P.W. GROSSER CONSULTING COLLECTED BY. . . D99 SOUNDVIEW DR. ,ORIENT PROJECT NO. . . . . 12 REMARKS: SOURCE:TW#2/FLOW:10 GPM/WR:15 MIN PARAMETER (S) RESULTS UNITS LIMIT TOTAL COLIFORM BACT. neqative ----- negative E. COLI. absent ----- absent CHLORIDE 57 mg/1 250 SPECIFIC CONDUCTIVITY 538 umhos COPPER <0.02 mg/1 (1.3] IRON 0.08 mg/l 0.30 DETERGENTS (MBAS) <0.04 mg/1 MANGANESE 0.02 mg/1 0.30 AMMONIA (NH3) <0.02 mg/l NITRATE (AS N) 8. 4 mg/l 10.0 . , LEAD <1.0 ug/1 _ (15.OJ PH - - 7.6 units ZINC 0.26 mg/l 5.0 - Result(s) Reported meet(s) NEW YORK STATE limits t- c puta! l a water . - Result(s.) Reported meet(s) (USEPA action level ( h c potable water . COPIES TO: -)ATE: IS5UEID J9; 17 J3 ABPORA=REI ^UP I��M � 578 Broad lbllw Paad. Melva Y. 11717 a (516a'" H/o Fu:(ri Ilex LAB NO: 9729031 "Y GOLDMAN WATER ANALYSIS TYPE. . . . . . POTABLE WATER MAIN RD ROUTINE MATTITUCK, NY 11952 ORIGIN. . . . WELL WELL TYPE. DATE COLLECTED. 09/14/93 POINT NO: DATE RECEIVED. . 09/15/93 .LOCATION: P.W. GROSSER CONSULTING COLLECTED BY. . . CUST SOUNDVIEW & HEATH DR. ,ORIENT PROJECT NO. . . . . 33 REMARKS: SOURCE:TW#1/FLOW:10 GPM/WR:15 MIN TOTAL ALDI6 `-'- ( uq/1 ) PARAMETER (S) RESULT LIMIT PARAMETER (S) RESULT LIMIT ALDICARB SULFONE <1 ALDICARB SULFOXIDE <1 ALDICARB <1 TOTAL ALDICARBS <3 - Result(s) Reported meet(s) NEW YORK STATE � M( ,ts for potable water. COPIES TO: DATE ISSUED 09/24/93 „DATE'. RUN. . . . .. . 09/23/93 Q DATE REPORTED. . 09/24/93 OfjIR ECTOR GINAI_ Rmd. �Y (SI l ,.„11747 ((S16)694-3W(S16)694-3We)ss�-� FAX:xc(sle)w"` LAB N0: 9329032 HAt2RY GOLDMAN WATER ANALYSIS TYPE. . . . . . POTABLE WATER MAIN RD ROUTINE MATTITUCR, NY 11952 ORIGIN. . . . WELL WELL TYPE. DATE COLLECTED. 09/14/93 POINT NO: DATE RECEIVED. . 09/15/93 LOCATION: P.W. GROSSER CONSULTING COLLECTED BY. . . CUST SOUNDVIEW DR. ,ORIENT PROJECT NO. . . . . 34 REMARKS: SOURCE:TW#2/FLOW:10 GPM/WR:15 MIN TOTAL ALDICARB - ( ug/1 ) PARAMETER (S) .RESULT LIMIT PARAMETER (S) RESULT LIMIT ALDICARB SULFONE <1 ALDICARB SULFOXIDE <1 ALDICARB <1 TOTAL ALDICARBS <3 - Result(s) Repotted meet(s) NEW YORK STATE limits for potable water. DATE ISSUED 09/24/93 COPIES TO: DATE:RUN. . . . . . . 09/23/93 ECTOR DATE REPORTED. . 09/24/93 ORIGINAL ; ., PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS r'y j SCOTT L. HARRIS ;J Supervisor Richard O. Wahl,Chairman George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald - Southold, New York 11971 Kemeth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 5 , 1993 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 4, 1993 : Be it RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. As stated in the Board' s July 13 , 1993 resolution, please notify the Board, in writing, prior to the Board' s October 25, 1993 meeting, as to the status of the application before the Health Department in order for the Board to determine whether or not to continue holding the hearing open. Your written response must be received no later than noon of the Friday prior to the meeting date. Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Sincerely, � cwt(/ Richard d G, Chairman X75 cc: Harold Reese, Jr. r PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ,' SCOTT L. HARRIS Richard G. Ward, Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham,Jr. { Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. - _ P. O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold,New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 14 , 1993 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, September 13 , 1993 : Be it RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. As stated in the Board' s July 13, 1993 resolution, please notify the Board, in writing, prior to the Board's October 25, 1993 meeting, as to the status of the application before the Health . Department in order for the Board to determine whether or not to continue holding the hearing open. Your written response must be received no later than noon of the Friday prior to the meeting date. Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Shar G. irdVZ Chairman Cc: Harold Reese, Jr. 'p����iri (,ync'�G ., Cz W @ U PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS "' ks SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Richard 0. Ward,Chairman George Ritchie Latham,Jr. '-'•'� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald '" Southold,New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 10 , 1993 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 9 , 1993 : Be it RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. As stated in the Board's July 13, 1993 resolution, please notify the Board, in writing, prior to the Board' s October 25, 1993 meeting, as to the status of the application before the Health Department in order for the Board to determine whether or not to continue holding the hearing open. Your written response must be received no later than moon of the Friday prior to the meeting date. Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward� W IM-S Chairman cc: Harold Reese, Jr. Southold Town P1anno Board 36 ely 12, 1993 Mr. Orlowski: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Kinzler: I think we already submitted copies of the executed deed? We did not intend to file it until the final subdivision was approved. Is that acceptable to the Board? Mr. Ward: Say that again? Mr. Kinzler: We did not intend to actually swap property until the final sub-- division approval is granted. Mr. Ward: Do it with the final map? Mr. Kinzler: Yes. (inaudible) Thank you. Mr. Ward: Hillcrest Estates -- Section 2 -- This major subdivision is for 20 lots on 2.2.9 acres located in Orient. SCTM# 1000--13--2--8.5. I guess the question is, where are you at? Mr. Kinzler: We had a meeting a number of months ago with members of the Suffolk County Dept. of Health. The issue is obviously water quality. And very frankly, while we applied for a variance from the Board and were denied, we believed and still believe that we would have an appropriate redress in the courts. What we've done in an effort to avoid that is to meet with the Board and representatives of the Health Dept. in an effort to achieve a compromise and to try to work out some solution. At their suggestion we had gone back and had retested the existing wells and had found that with some of the wells there had been changes in water quality, that there's been a dissipation from the water table of some of the contaminants that previously existed but that in other locations they still exist. As a result of the initial retesting we've decided to drop new wells and to see what water quality is in other parts of the proposed parcel. We're hopeful, and unfortunately the driller is unable to move with the same speed (inaudible) , with respect to the testing, and not only the testing but also with respect to the dropping of a well for the water for the pumps for the fire department. We hope to get that accomplished real quickly. Unfortunately he's not moving as quickly as we would like and unfortunately we have no control over it. And we hope to get that done shortly to go back to the Board of Health and to hopefully accomplish some kind of a reasonable compromise in terms of the subdivision. What we contemplate the possibility of doing is combining in some cases, lots. In four or five cases we may take two lots and combine them into one lot for purposes of complying and perhaps averaging out, if you will, the respective water quality. Southold Town Planniward 37 Oy 12., 1993 Mr. McDonald: You've been denied at the Board of Review. What's your time frame remaining in an Article 78. Do you have much time left, alotted time? Mr. Kinzler: My feeling is that the time I think is one that by reason of the implicit agreement to try to work it out is stayed. Mr. McDonald: But you're anticipating strongly a potential reconfiguration of the lots? Mr. Kinzler: We are hopeful that given the lapse of time -- the original tests were, I think 10 or 12 years old, that given the lapse of time there would have been some dissipation of the contaminants in the water. Mr. McDonald: Realistically, I know this is an impossible thing to answer but I'm going to ask it anyhow. How long do you think it is going to take to get to a point where you're going to know whether you're going to be denied or you're going to make a reasonable compromise with them. Mr. Kinzler: I'm certainly not unwilling to keep you posted. We have the further results coming in I guess within 30 days and at that point we're going to go back to the Board and meet with them again with a view to say look, this is the situation, what can we do, what can you live with, what's reasonable. And they've indicated a desire to be reasonable, as we have. I thins; certainly within 90 days we would have a better idea of where we're going with the Board. I recognize the fact that you've kept it open for some time, I really am. 0n the other hand, litigation is not something that serves anyone's aim and something we've really tried to avoid. Mr. Ward: If you're going to reconfigure, what's the consequences of you losing this application? Mr. Kinzler: The way I can see, dealing with the issue is to come before you in terms of leaving the existing subdivision intact, but putting in either Covenants or Restrictions which, if you will, preclude the development of designated lots, and leaving them as open area or something of that nature. Rather than having to resubmit a new application, but certainly if the Board had a difference preference, we would certainly address it. Mr. McDonald: It wouldn't make any difference in the final hearing. Those kinds of changes, if you want to simply add them to the lots or rename them wouldn't make any difference at the final. If you were going to have more lots it would be a problem, but taking them away is nothing. Mr. Latham: You mentioned firewells, which is good you mentioned it. You could buy my vote by a firewell, and if you showed me a firewell. . . Mr. Kinzler: We've directed Mr. Casola to install it. Mr. Latham: This is for Section 2; Section 1 you're not going ahead with the firewell at this time? Ms. Spiro: There's one in each. (everyone talking) Southold Town Planninooard 38 *y 12, 1993 Mr. Latham: Well, I think we need it. And you are going to build it? Mr. Kinzler: Yes. Mr. Orlowski: The fire districts are bothering both of us about this and it's. . . Mr. Kinzler: We understand. We're not insensitive. Mr. Ward: What's the pleasure of the Board? Mr. McDonald: I make a motion we hold this hearing open. Mr. Tatham: Second. Mr. Ward: All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlows'ci, Mr. Tatham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Edwards: I'd like to make one comment Mr. Chairman. On item number 8 on our agenda tonight was on Fishers Island, Mrs. Annette Zabohons'ci. She's had a two lot subdivision that's been going on for a long time and her problem seems to be with the Health Dept. and Judge Edwards just asked me what the hold up was. I don't know if it was with the attorney or who, but T told him that we couldn't forsee to have the final hearing until we have Health approval, and that's the case not only with this application but with every application. Judge Edwards(?) : I'm going to call up Steve Ham and see what's going on because I see (inaudible) often and she's quite upset. Mr. Edwards: Well, that's the reason I brought it up because I know that you're familiar with it and I just wanted you to know that it's not just this particular piece, it's every piece. Mr. McDonald: Is it on public water? Judge Edwards: No. Mr. McDonald: It's not on public water. Mr. Edwards: Well, there's public water available and she's had (inaudible) tested, sewage system, there's no city sewers. Mr. McDonald: But I mean if there's public water, what's left? Mr. Ward: Ken, was that the archeological study that, held it up? Mr. Edwards: That's been done a long time ago. We're waiting for the Health Dept. Mr. McDonald: Ts she Board of Review or something? Southold Town Plannin*ard 39 12, 1993 Mr. Edwards: I don't know where it is. Judge Edwards: I'll find out from Steve Ham. Mr. Edwards: It's not with this Board. Ms. Spiro: I think that he's almost completed it. In the letter that he sent to us he had to do some Covenants and Restrictions and I think he said they're just about to be filed. Mr. Edwards: Do they have the Health? Ms. Spiro: I think they do. Mr. Edwards: We can't set the final hearing until we have it. Judge Edwards: Did Melissa say that they have been filed? Mr. Edwards: Well, she seems to think. . .she just had a letter (everyone talking) . The process you know, as I do, has been going on for a couple of years. (everyone talking) That was my only comment. Mr. Ward: What's the pleasure of the Board? Mr. McDonald: I make a motion to adjourn. Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Opposed? Motion carried. There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Martha A. Jones Secretary 1WJJ Richard G. Ward, Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �i €'- T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �' � '' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. `�1 :�y . 'Ov' Richard G. Ward 1 �}i%- Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 July 13 , 1993 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 12, 1993 : Be it RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. You indicated at the meeting that within ninety ( 90 ) days you would have a better idea of the status of the application before the Health Department. Therefore, please notify the Board, in writing, prior to the Board' s October 25, 1993 meeting, as to the status of the application before the Health Department in order for the Board to determine whether or not to continue holding the hearing open. Your written response must be received no later than noon of the Friday prior to the meeting date. Also, as discussed at the meeting, it is the Board' s understanding that your client intends to install the required firewells in both sections of Hillcrest without delay. Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Harold Reese, Jr. s J -44 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS r } SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman >✓- ,. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. j = y Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road �>.�-�rccrf�'' Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 June 15, 1993 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Road Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 .2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 14 , 1993 : Be it RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. As requested in our last letter, please notify the Board, in writing, prior to each regularly scheduled meeting, as to the status of the application before the Suffolk County Department of Health Services in order for the Board to determine whether or not to continue holding the hearing open. Your written response must be received no later than noon of the Friday prior to the meeting date. Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Siinc/erel (� Sincerely, /J1 �`J K/ Richard G. Ward 'Ins Chairman cc: Harold Reese, Jr. • p�a�yr��31;�v�;4 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS t SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman %, �' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. { Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road ,zarr Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 25, 1993 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Rd. Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 Re: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8.2I Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 24, 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. As requested in our last letter, please notify the Board, in writing, prior to each regularly scheduled meeting, as to the status of the application before the Suffolk County Department of Health Services in order for the Board to determine whether or not to continue holding the hearing open. Your written response must be received no later than noon of the Friday prior to the meeting date. Please contact this office if you have any further questions regarding the above. Since/rely,, �/ /t164t O' t/ /wows Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Harold Reese, Jr. t�rst +bras. Inc. ! ms aaa SUNRISE HIGHWAY LYNBROOK,N.Y. 1 1568 3/6yY3.6250 May 21 , 1993 Mr. Richard G. Ward Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold , N.Y. 11971 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Sent : By Fax To ( 516) 765-1823 Dear Mr. Richard Ward; please he advised that on the above application Casola Wells has taken samples of well water on this subdivision. As of this date Paul Grosser our engineer and hydrogeologist has not received the test results . We request that this application be held open until such time as we get the water sample results . Thank you for your patience and understanding. Very trully(� urs , Harold Reese Jr. President n �p Lei MAY 2 11993 HR:cc A4F k , . TOT" • " • ��SUFFO�kC O o�O Gym PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman - ifi `� O�� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 4, 1993 Ben Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck, New York 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM#, 1000-13-2-8.2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 3 , 1993 : Be it RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Please notify the Board, in writing, prior to each regularly scheduled meeting, as to the status of the application before the Suffolk County Department of Health Services in order for the Board to determine whether or not to continue holding the hearing open. I have enclosed a copy of the Planning Board meeting dates. Your written response must be received no later than noon of the Friday prior to the meeting date. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Since/rely',`6114 n/ OJ Richard G. Ward 14"5 Chairman Encl. cc: Harold Reese Jr. eY SU8RLE- lKttst +Nr08. fnr. � 855 SUNRISE HIGHWAY LYNBROOK.N.Y. 11563 616-683-6200 April 16 , 1993 Mr. Richard Ward Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 RE: ites Section II Dear Mr . Ward; This is to inform you that Mr . Paul Grosser, a hydrologist, Mr. Ben Kinzler counsel , and I met with the Suffolk County Health Department on April 13 , 1993 , concerning the water quality on the above captioned development . Several proposals are being actively pursued to obtain Health Department approval . I appreciate your understanding on this application and will keep you informed as to our progress . Ve ++,, truly` urs, Harold Reese Jr. HR:cc SOUTNDLD TGWN PLANNING BOARD ` SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNT& BOARD 5APR ,'1993 Mr. War Would anybody else like t dress this Board on this? If n what is the pleasu f the Board? Mr. McDonald: I that w eep this hearing open. Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. McDonald: Se ded. All t e in favor? Ayes: Mr. E rds, Mr. Latham, Mr. M nald, Mr rlowski, Mr. Ward. Mr. onald: Opposed? Motion carried. Hearings Held Over From Previous Meetings: Mr. Ward: Hillcrest Estates, Section 2 - This major subdivision is for twenty lots on 22.9 acres located in Orient. SCTM #1000=13-2-8. 5. Mr. Harold Reese Jr. - I was not aware that this was on the calendar this evening but in light of that Young and Young has addressed a letter to the Board trying to determine what the bluff line is on this particular subdivision. I wrote a follow-up letter to the Board which you should have received last week wondering what the outcome of this meeting was to determine this bluff line and we do have a meeting with the Health Department concerning the water problem of this parcel tomorrow. Mr. Ward: As of today, we have nothing in writing back from you. Mr. Reese: There was something from Young and Young and I didn' t bring in the file because I didn' t know it was on the calendar but there was a letter from Young and Young to the Board to try and determine the Bluff line. Mr. McDonald: Would you drop us a note and let us know about how long you think the time frame is on that? Mr. Reese: No problem. Thank you. Mr. Ward: What is the pleasure of the Board? Mr. McDonald: I move we keep this hearing open. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Seconded. All those in favor? SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANN# BOARD 6 APR*12, 1993 • Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward, Mr. McDonald. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. War . EleR Sievernich - This minor subdivision is fitit two lots n 3. acres located on the east side of Cox ck Road in Ma titSCTM #1000-113-8-5. Is there anybo here that would 'kaddress the Board regarding this pr erty? If not, what ' pleasure of the Board? Mr. McDonald: ould like to make a motion. BE IT RESto take the final public heaving off the Planning Boardnda. Your client will be ;even the right to restore the apat on upon notification by u in writing, that the necesap ovals have been obtai d from the Zoning Board of Appea Mr. Orlowski: ond. ` Mr. Ward: Motseconded. 11 those n favor? Ayes: Mr. McD , Mr. Edwar , Mr Orlowski, Mr. LatMr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? So carried. MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS, OT LIN CHANGES AND SET OFF APPLICATIONS Final Determinations: Mr. Ward: Francis Green r er - This majo subdivision is for four lots on 15. 581 Cres located on th north side of Eugene' s Road; 381. 541 eet west of Bay Aven in Cutchogue. SCTM #1000-97-3-18. 1>>r Mr. Orlowski: I woy(ld like to make a motion. Be it RESOL . D' that the Southold Town Planni g Board authorize the C firman to endorse the final surve dated January 27, 19 This su ivision received conditional final 'app val on January 11 1993 . All conditions of approval have be met. Mr. Lath Second. Mr. d: Seconded. All those in favor o ' rOJ f`a PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS � T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr— Chairman ��^ � ; C1`� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 13 , 1993 Ben Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 31.0 Great Neck, New York 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM#1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, April 12, 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates, Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Please respond to the Board' s March 23 , 1993 inquiry as to the status of the application before the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G, Ward Chairman cc: Harold Reese Jr. SOUTHOLD TOWN PLVNG BOARD 7 MARC*2, 1993 Mr. Latham: I move that we close the hearing. Mr. Orlowski: Second. Mr. Ward: All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Latham, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. McDonald: Mr. Chairman, I would like to offer a motion. WHEREAS, Janet T. Swanson and Marion D. Fitzsimmons are the owners of the property known and designated as SCTM #1000-15-3-1 and SCTM #1000-15-2-17 . 5, located at Route 25, Orient; and Whereas this lot line change, to be known as Proposed Lot Line Change for Janet T. Swanson and Marion D. Fitzsimmons, is for a lot line change subtracting 4, 600 square feet from a 1, 440,301 square foot parcel and adding it to a 72,131 square foot parcel; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8) Part 617, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on March 1, 1993; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at Town Hall, Southold, New York on March 22, 1993; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of the Town of Southold have been met; and now therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final survey dated January 5, 1993 . Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Hearings Held Over From Previous Meetings: - SOUTHOLD TOWN PLA1*NG BOARD 8 MARCEW, 1993 Mr. Ward: HillcrestEstates Section 2 - This major subdivision is for twenty lots on 22 . 9 acres located in Orient. SCTM #1000-1±3--&-5-. Mr. McDonald: I would ask that we hold this hearing open. Mr. Latham: I would like to put a cap on this if possible, the last time we hold it open. Is there any reason why we should keep holding it open. Mr. Ward: It' s because of the Suffolk County Health Department. Mr. McDonald: The last meeting I asked that we send out a letter to the applicant because they came before us and said that they would have it done in X amount of time and we are quite a bit past that time. Did that letter go out? Melissa Spiro: Indirectly, it went out. Ken Abruzzowho I believe is here was working on some part of it, the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line, I think which is in the works. Mr. Abruzzo: I have written a letter to the Trustees of the Town of Southold. Mr. Ward: I would appreciate it if you could just get it on the tape here. Mr. Abruzzo: I don' t want to say that I am representing the applicant although we are doing work for them. I certainly don' t mind telling you our end of what we have been up to. We have received the comments of the Planning Board and we have superimposed two foot contours on the subdivision and we have indicated the proposed wells to do a public water company there. The problem was we went out and located a top of the bluff and one of the conditions was that we show some setbacks from the actual top of the bluff using the coastal erosion hazard line, that is really just aereal super imposed photo prepared by the NYSDEC. We, as surveyors have a very hard time distinguishing in this particular piece of property what somebody would consider a top of the bluff because of the vegetation and because of the repose of it, it is very easy if we work out with some bluffs that just drops off and it is sand and it is a very easy thing to pick out. This area is not a very easy thing to pick out. We have picked an area that is quite a bit seaward of where the area of coastal erosion hazard map shows the bluff and so that we don' t run into problems down the road with saying we have a 'much bigger envelope than somebody might interpret down the road, I have written a letter to the Trustees and asked them to have somebody come out to the site at their convenience and we would meet them out there and ask them to flag or determine what they believe the top of the bluff would be since I believe that is their jurisdiction to determine that top of the bluff. I guess that letter is a month old at least, to this date I have not heard back from them. I SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANWG BOARD 9 MARCH*, 1993 guess I am doing this just so everybody is in agreement of what line we are going to use for a top of the bluff. Young and Young would certainly be happy to pick it and we have picked one and located one. I don' t think it would necessarily be the one that they would pick. Mr. Ward: Has there been any movement with the County on the water system? Mr. Abruzzo: That is into the County for their review and to this date I have not heard any negative response although there is an engineer, Mr. Paul Grosser who is sort of an expert in the water field who is doing that application separately from Young and Young. Although, we did do the map and he is doing the application. As far as getting back in here I think that one of the hold ups is hearing from the Trustees. Mr. Latham: Well, I will withdraw, I didn' t know about that. I ' ll withdraw my motion. Mr. Abruzzo: The attorney hasn' t told me to say anything to you to keep it open but I believe they would want to until they resolve this. Mr. McDonald: I still would ask that we send a letter to the applicant and ask them to please bring us up to date and how much longer are we going to hold this open. Their consultant is here and they were saying it was going to take maybe three months. We are getting down the road apiece, I am sure there is a reason but they should bring us up to date. Mr. Latham: I think that is a good idea and I will second Mark' s request. I would also add that the applicant promised two firewells some years ago and stood before us here and said they would take care of it. The last time I think young Mr. Reesewas here, a year or two ago and I would like to put that in the letter too. Mr. Abruzzo: As long as I am up here is there any way we could ask for the support of the Planning Board to get the Trustees to write them another letter. Mr. McDonald: First contact them, call or stop to see what the status is and then if it is not worth coming just send them a letter asking if they can help us. Mr. Latham: Would you talk to Mr. Reese Jr. , about the firewell? Mr. Abruzzo: His attorney, Ben Kinsler and I happen to like him and he is a good attorney but we don' t get carbon copy on a lot of these things either so we are really poorly informed about who is doing what and it might be a great idea what you are asking to do to sort of correspond to find out where this SOUTHOLD TOWN PLA$NG BOARD 10 MARCO22, 1993 project is on the other end. I know I have been waiting for the Trustees, I have been trying to be very patient because I don' t want to make anyone mad and say this is not the time of year to go out there but it might just be the very time of year to go out there without a lot of vegetation out there to locate things. I mean on the trees, we can see through a lot of things to locate them. Mr. Ward: O.K. , regarding Hillcrest Estates Section II what is the pleasure of the Board? Mr. Ward: I think I have already made a motion to hold it open. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Edwards, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. **************************************** Mr. Ward: Eleanor Sievernich - This minor subdivision is for two lots on 3 .743 acres located on the east side of Cox Neck Road in Mattituck. SCTM #1000-113-8-5. Mr. Orlowski: I would like to make a motion to keep the hearing open. Is there anyone here representing Eleanor Sievernich because this has been quite a while. Mr. Ward: Isn' t this one that is at the ZBA? Mr. Orlowski: It has been there for about two and one half years now, this is October 1990. Mr. Ward: Maybe we should address a letter to both the applicant and the ZBA to see where we are at on this. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Seconded. All those in favor? Ayes : Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS, LOT LINE CHANGES AND SET OFF APPLICATIONS hrp��,UFFOC�-C®G,R A `1 C3 ?, r PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS O Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 'i� °" - ���• Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward J` Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 23, 1993 Ben Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck, New York 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM#1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, March 22 , 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates, Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Please indicate, in writing, prior to April 12, 1993, the status of the application before the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, 964t4/ Richard G. Ward ms Chairman ♦ i r PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS r '� SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman _ Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. . Y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward - --"— P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 2, 1993 Ben Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck, New York 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM#1000-13-2-8.2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, March 1, 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates, Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, (/�/ ��/ /1 r�/�QAW 14 f'Va-� Richard G. Ward Chairman YOUNG & YOUNG pd PLANNING, ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING r 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11801 -. Telephone 818-727-2909 Facsimile 818-727-0144 February 19, 1993 Mr. Jay Bredemeyer, III, President Town of Southld Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 " . RE: HILL CREST ESTATES, SECTION 2 2- 2 ' at Orient, T/O Southold, New York "'Y Dear Mr. Bredemeyer: Pursuant to the Town of Southold Planning Board letter of December 21, 1992 (copy enclosed) , the owner of the above captioned subdivision asked us to address Items 1, 2 , and 3 . We have subsequently located what we feel would be the top of bluff (Item 2) , and transposed the "Limit Of Coastal Erosion Hazard Area As Shown On N.Y.S.D.E.C. Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Map Dated 8/29/88" . As you can see on the enclosed map, there is quite a discrepancy between the two (2) lines. In order for us to indicate the building envelopes on Lots 45, 46, and 47, we would ask for your Board's assistance in determining the actual top of bluff. We can make our firm available to meet with you, or a representative of your Board, on site at your convenience. Please do not hesitate to contact this office with any comments or questions regarding this matter. Very truly yours, K-El-v_ -yup Kenneth F. Abruzzo KFA/ -t— Encl. cc: Ms. Melissa Spiro + 1 Print + Encl. Mr. Harold Reese, Jr. + 1 Print + Encl. Ben Kinzler, Esq. + 1 Print + Encl. ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG THOMAS C.WOLPERT KENNETH F.ABRUZZO Professional Engineer Land Surveyor Professional Engineer land Surveyor &Land Surveyor o w PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ,+� -... � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 21, 1992 _ Ben Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck. NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM#1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: On November 18, 1992, Ken Abruzzo met with Melissa Spiro of this office to review the status of the above mentioned subdivision. He told Ms. Spiro that he is preparing revised maps to be submitted to the Suffolk County Health Department. Two or three lots will be eliminated in order to provide additional acreage for a water facility for the subdivision. Mr. Abruzzo asked if the Planning Board would notify him of any additional information that must be shown on the map. The following information is required: 1. The topography must be shown at 2 ' intervals. 2. The bluff line and the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area must be indicated on the map. 3 . Building envelopes must be shown for all sound front lots. 4. The Planning Board will be proceeding with the SEQRA review for Section Two upon submission of the revised maps. However, the Long Environmental Assessment Form must be revised to reflect the changes that will be made to the subdivision map. Page 2 ' Hillcrest Estates, Section Two In addition, the Planning Board will be referring the Long Environmental Assessment Form to their Environmental Consultant for review. Your client will be responsible for submitting the $400. 00 review fee before the Planning Board will authorize its consultant to proceed with the review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr.� ; Chairman cc: Joseph J. Lizewski, Chair, Groundwater Resource Committee Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Harold Reese, Jr. , Applicant Ken Abruzzo, Young and Young 7 7 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �> '� ` Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward t Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 9, 1993 Ben Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck, New York 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM#1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, February 8, 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates, Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Z,LN*J4 w Richard G. Ward Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ` �_ '"" •e. lY Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ` Richard G. Ward �y1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 12, 1993 Ben Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck, New York 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM#1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, January 11, 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates, Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, p� Richard G. Ward ry'tS Chairman 4`��prJJfFD(��y Q . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 0 ^ SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman di, ,- ' �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. b� Richard G. Ward " Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 21 . 1992 . Ben Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck, NY 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM#1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: On November 18, 1992 , Ken Abruzzo met with Melissa Spiro of this office to review the status of the above mentioned subdivision. He told Ms. Spiro that he is preparing revised maps to be submitted to the Suffolk County Health Department. Two or three lots will be eliminated in order to provide additional acreage for a water facility for the subdivision. Mr. Abruzzo asked if the Planning Board would notify him of any additional information that must be shown on the map. The following information is required: 1. The topography must be shown at 2' intervals. 2. The bluff line and the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area must be indicated on the map. 3 . Building envelopes must be shown for all sound front lots. 4 . The Planning Board will be proceeding with the SEQRA review for Section Two upon submission of the revised maps. However, the Long Environmental Assessment Form must be revised to reflect the changes that will be made to the subdivision map. Page 2 Hillcrest Estates, Section Two In addition, the Planning Board will be referring the Long Environmental Assessment Form to their Environmental Consultant for review. Your client will be responsible for submitting the $400. 00 review fee before the Planning Board will authorize its consultant to proceed with the review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr.i .` 9 ,�yf Chairman cc: Joseph J. Lizewski, Chair, Groundwater Resource Committee Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Harold Reese, Jr. , Applicant Ken Abruzzo, Young and Young Y (� i1 7 , �Ir• PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS " !n' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ` :1� y ,t Richard G. Ward _a,^ „ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 16, 1992 Harold Reese Jr. Reese' s Dodge City 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, New York 11563 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Reese: I am in receipt of your letter dated November 30, 1992, in reference to the exact location for the firewells. There are two firewells required; to be located within the right-of-way as follows: 1 . The south west corner of Sound View Drive and Hill Crest Drive. (Lot No. 12 on the subdivision map of Hill Crest Estates, Section 1. ) 2. The south west corner of Hill Crest Drive and Heath Drive. (The Park area on the subdivision map of Hill Crest Estates, Section 1. ) I have enclosed another copy of the map indicating the locations mentioned above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr: Chairman "tom Encl. cc: Ben Kinzler Z " + Ll 5 \ Cu �23 V 0 0 4 0 42,485 S.F. O o i e,` °. (8.25) + /q9 0i0 2 y / W 27Y.e/' d N a 11 y (/\ cor24 � o y°- 0 40,00/SF. _ F ° (8.26) of \ . 6 L�p4y TE57 NOLEN0.2 124.7 L• OO.Se, N r.00' y Sv D DRIVE/(EW U s•)e•Swo'v 0p y m I 2.00' �t W I U t- T.07•Ir•/O'W. A•L)J 00, r /Y1.7/• L'•°J JP ti � f9p �f� 930 1 d lr mp o `s.>39' o. P 94 o'" J rlQEof 115.40' rb Z3 , - D w m t q y ° 6 �8e �1 ` 9Js 34Cb O F ° LOT 26 o yot, o c 40,236 S.F- nl� �� 4 f0 (8.28) 0 m ° °°o�yti y S.1702?'/O'M o 'k ° � • ` HBe C 0\ °y oeO• 9OF ti 26700• 4 30 c • yti °Sti 41.4 ,'70 DOO s, 'y y - � ti .a " • " o �oC 0 4'4 \ + (00'60 Cb o i� ra• .� 6b yl ti Be _ oo, 3y_ 90". { 4 0 n ` \ 6° , ti4 .0\ Ob oo. 11 iso o o. U 9``aW. � ..� 0 160 10 oy" 3� 6y oo, 1 � 1 \ d� �• dbo° o; POGO ra., Vcv 26 l u' 1 �J PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor . ,•.' .moi George Richie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 15 , 1992 Ben Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck, New York 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on December 14, 1992 : Be it RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, &,� 0ti. - Bennett Orlowski, Jr.)4".v Chairman scc6�t( Reese Bros. Dodge pB tam s M November 30, 1992 Bennett Orlowski Jr . Chairman Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold , N.Y. 11971 RE: Fire well location for Hillcrest Estates SCTM #1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Orlowski ; I am in receipt of your letter dated November 23 , 1992 concerning the location of fire wells on the Hillcrest property in Orient . I appreciate your help in this regard . So that there is no misunderstanding on their exact location would you please indicate in writing the specific location; for example, S. E. corner Hillcrest Drive and Heath Drive. I look forward to your prompt response to this request . Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy and Healthy New Year . Ver trull ou Harold Reese Jr . President cc: Ben Kinzler 1 HR:cc i li ,LT 19T SOGIMIl)En nTL ) The Top Guns in Dodge for 46 yec n. 855 Sunrise Highway, Lynbrook, N.Y. 11563 C4 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 6 SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ��� mss` Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. i�.( Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November 24, 1992 Ben Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck, New York 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on November 23, 1992: Be it RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. /lIns Chairman slaf 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS H r- %s- SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman C:P � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November 23, 1992 Harold Reese, Jr. Reese' s Dodge City 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, New York 11563 RE: Fire well location for Hillcrest Estates SCTM #1000-13-2-8.2 Dear Mr. Reese: As per the discussion that took place on October 19, 1992 at the public hearing for Hillcrest Estates, Section Two, the Planning Board asked the Orient Fire District to verify the location for the firewells. Enclosed please find a copy of the map indicating the fire well locations as requested by the Orient Fire Department. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ' Chairman / Encl. .. N % y r ' N y w ow4c 4 , BS S.F. � s'wo • O �+p (B.25) I 72.61' ti yo a LOT 24 � ^�- o y • 0 40,00/SF. F ° (6.26) L1p4b TESTNOL£N012 J6' � �t.00' _ N.47•t t'/O"E. 'y`22J 00 0 DRIVE s.7e•54'4o r w t.00. 5.47.11'/0"W. q.17J0p, N /24.71' L•yJ Sy 90F � p — 2/5.46' rb j. t O 54 m : 2Z- 0 6 Sao cb � C C %% A3 3 J F ° ,'•, L0726 o Lr ppo Cl c 40,2J6 S.F. N ,o (8.28) do m 0 OtiI y S.47^22'10"Y 4I1 4 195.96' ? ! y F O iso JI9- 4 00I Iwo o g\ Oy ti 26700' \6 \\O y0 3 44b 4`b 'ao 000 I, m °ll ° \04 ti 0 p4 v � :5 - eti 6 \ 'oe�e„ orb �\ '\'� p 4�'° ' b° c ° \�w 4ti0 QOb .i' � l ✓.• ''to � 6 b y�Be oo. \ "d 90. �4 \ yo 00 �y isoob SiTieoo �oo• o0�oJ6Os�O \y40 ^pO00, cb t\ mocv'4;� "O 10... 60 y0 doh- 3b`bb a p. id0' i' r°• �0" r,.. w .tia s Ob'o< �9 \aa /_4% �, Suri=rte h�o�OSpFFO(,�coGy Iia, 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS OT SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �f� O�� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 20, 1992 Harrison M. Demarest, Jr. Secretary NOV 19 Orient Fire District .s • i Orient, New York 11957 RE: Hillcrest Estates SOLTHO D PLA�I^1R'C r , SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. — Dear 000-13-2-5.Dear Mr. Demarest: As you know, on October 19, 1992, the Planning Board held a hearing on the proposed subdivision for Hillcrest Estates Section Two. It was decided that the Planning Board would hold the hearing open while the applicant, Harold Reese, Jr. , continued to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The matter of the outstanding firewells was also brought to the attention of Harold Reese, Jr. He said that he had taken the subdivision over from his father, and did not have the correspondence noting where firewells were to be located. He said that he would install the wells upon notification of the exact location. It is the Planning Board' s understanding that two firewells were required for the whole subdivision (Section One and Section Two) . Our files indicate that the Fire District requested that fire wells be placed on, Lot #24 and Lot #29• This determination was based on the numbering shown on the preliminary map, which indicated both sections. The lot numbers for Section Two where changed when the subdivision was divided into sections. Lot # 24 is located in Section One. Lot #29 is located in Section Two and is now shown as Lot #44. I have enclosed a copy of a map for each Section. Please verify that the above mentioned lots are the correct locations for the firewells. 11 fr/, Very truly yours, v 14' en�O�w� Chairman /���Q Encl. gyp( � ' Z / _ G'&L,,eZ� SrM '' 15 tV-etf S PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS a tin SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman h �, ` O�'� ` Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward f Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November 4, 1992 Ben Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck, New York 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board on November 2, 1992: Be it RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Exp' , Bennett Orlowski, J) A" Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti }�' "'r •� .Z SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ,ji Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �(�,( Lf ''�� Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 21 , 1992 Ben Kinzler 1010 Northern Boulevard Suite 310 Great Neck, New York 11021-5306 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section Two East Marion, New York SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following took place at the October 19, 1992 Planning Board public meeting: It was RESOLVED to hold the hearing open for the proposed subdivision of Hillcrest Estates Section Two while your client continues to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Please be advised that as noted in previous correspondence from this office, Health Department approval is not the only outstanding item for final approval of this subdivision. (Please refer to your records for such correspondence. ) Please keep us informed of your progress before the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. In light of the discussion which took place at the meeting, whereby your client agreed to install the firewells upon receipt of where they are to be located, the Planning Board has requested that the Orient Fire District confirm such location. You will be notified upon receipt of the Fire District' s report. Please contact this office if you have any questions concerning the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Harold Reese, Jr. ,r o��SUFFO(�-coG c yr. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS l SCOTT L. HARRIS cp Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman � .F. `� `� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 20, 1992 Harrison M. Demarest, Jr. Secretary Orient Fire District Orient, New York 11957 RE: Hillcrest Estates SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Demarest: As you know, on October 19, 1992, the Planning Board held a hearing on the proposed subdivision for Hillcrest Estates Section Two. It was decided that the Planning Board would hold the hearing open while the applicant, Harold Reese, Jr. , continued to pursue approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The matter of the outstanding firewells was also brought to the attention of Harold Reese, Jr. He said that he had taken the subdivision over from his father, and did not have the correspondence noting where firewells were to be located. He said that he would install the wells upon notification of the exact location. It is the Planning Board' s understanding that two firewells were required for the whole subdivision (Section One and Section Two) . Our files indicate that the Fire District requested that fire wells be placed on Lot #24 and Lot #29. This determination was based on the numbering shown on the preliminary map, which indicated both sections. The lot numbers for Section Two where changed when the subdivision was divided into sections. Lot # 24 is located in Section One. Lot #29 is located in Section Two and is now shown as Lot #44. I have enclosed a copy of a map for each Section. Please verify that the above mentioned lots are the correct locations for the firewells. Very truly yours, 2�inettrw� Zntf Chairman Encl. • � SUSFiL� �B Orient Fire District �1S - ORIENT, LONG ISLAND NEW YORK 11957 October 15, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, LI, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski : The Legal Notice published in The Suffolk Times dated October 8, 1992, on page 28, states pursuant to Section 276 of t e Town Law, a public hearing is to be held on the 19th day of October 1992 at 7:30 P.M. in reference to Hillcrest Estates. Therefore, at a special meeting of the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Orient Fire District held on Wednesday, October 14th, the decision was made to request the Planning Board to delay the final approval of the Hillcrest Estates until the fire wells are placed, installed and in work- ing order as requested by the Commissioners on previously marked maps which were provided to the District by the Town. Thank you for taking this matter into consideration. Sincerely, �cr�uarsn 172��� HARRISON M. DEMAREST, JR. Secretary Orient Fire District cc: -� Scott L. Harris, Supervisor Members of the Town Board OCT 16 1992 so11TF(I PLANNING Y _LEGAUNOTrCI -- tion 1.Sts ty File No.7218; Notice or Public Hearing on the weriMpgound View Drive- STATE OF ORK) JOUCE IS HEREBY GIVEN that 7:35 P.M.Final approval for the lot ) SS. pursuant to Section 276 of the Town line change for Spectacle Ridge,Inc. Law,a public hearing will be held by at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, COUNTY OF SUFFOLIi� the Southold Town Planning Board,at County of Suffolk and the State of the Town Hall,Main Road,Southold, New York.Suffolk County Tax Map �A2A C DNu _ Of Mattitnck, in New York in said Town on the 19th Number.1000-84-1-2 and 84-14. said County, being duly BWOlA, Saye that he/She day of October 1992 on the question The property is bordered on the of the following: northwest by Oregon Road; on the is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIKES, a 7:30 P.M. Final determination for north by land now of formerly of the Weekly NuiII the major subdivision for Hillcrest Society for the Propagation of the yEws Newspaper,p pe ' pblished at MattitnCk' Estates, Section 2 at Orient, in the Faith; on the northeast by Bridge the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and Town of Southold,County of Suffolk Lane and by land now or formerly of and the State of New York. Suffolk Lally; on the southeast by land now State of New York, and that the Notice of which County Tax Map Number. 1000-13-2- or formerly of Syloret Estates,Map the annexed is a printed copy, has been regular- 8.2. No. 6390; on the south by land now The property is bordered on the or formerly of McGinnigle and by ly published in said Newspaper once each week north by Hillcrest Estates,Section 1, land now or formerly of Shalvey; on for weeks BIICCe88tYCly, commencing OII Suffolk County File No.7218,by the southwest by land now or for- per{. land now or formerly of Jane Selvar merly of Julius SMreI. the �YF day of Vc- Ora=219 '7J/ and by the Long Island Sound;on the 7:37 P.M.Final approval for the lot east land now or formed of Otto by y line change for Spectacle Ridge Inc. and Rosalie Zapf;on the east by land at Cutchogue, in the Town of now or formerly of Harrison A De- Southold, County of Suffolk and the merest,Jr.,and by Robert Demarest State of New York. Suffolk County and another; on the south by Heath Tax Map Number. 1000-73-1-3.1 and Drive and by Hillcrest Estates, Sec- 84-1-2 Principal Clerk The property is bordered on the northwest by Oregon Road; on the northeast by Bridge Lane; on the _ southeast by land now or formerly of �to before me this_ Asip, by land now or formerly of McGurwgle,and by land now or for- day of OC7013£0- 19 9 ly of Shalvey; on the southwest by ` Z W liE by land now or formerly of Julius / LEN G.BEPDINKA Skirel. Notery Public,State of New York 7:40 P.M. Final approval for the No.4528520 major subdivision for Southold Villas, Qualified in Suffolk Coruiry l Section Two at Southold,in the Town Commission Expires August 31,19_.1 of Southold, County of Suffolk,and .s.-c.,..s v.,.,vnh SnfWk Cnunty BEN KINZLER MS ATTORNEYAT LAW 1010 NORTHERN BOULEVARD SUITE 310 GREAT NEGK. NEW YORK 11021-6306 16161482-8300 FAX 616-482-2749 DEBORAH BETH KAHN August 17, 1992 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Planning Board, Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Major Subdivision, Hillcrest Estates Section II SCTM 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Pursuant to my telephone conversations with Holly Perrone and Melissa Spiro of your office, we are confirming the hearing date in the above matter on October 19, 1992 at 7 : 30 P.M. This letter will serve to advise you that the reasons the hearing is taking place in October are that Mr. Kinzler has several trials pending and Mr. Harold Reese will be out of the country for the month of September, 1992 . We greatly appreciate not only your decision to hear this matter, but also for the extraordinary courtesy extended to us by yourself via Ms. Perrone and Ms. Spiro. Should you require any additional information relative to the above-captioned matter, please feel free to contact this office. Ve truly yours, ia Liebe Office Manager R ff�a RR fI M f2 cc: Harold Reese D I5 l7 L5 IJ U AUG 1 91992 1 m SDUTNDLD TOWN Pll KING BOARD PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Oy � �;,�' �1y SCOTT L. HARRISSu Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �'� t,~,: p Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 18, 1992 Ben Kinzler Attorney At Law 147 Willis Avenue Mineola, New York 11501 RE: Major Subdivision Hillcrest Estates, Sect. 2 SCTM#1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 17, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, October 19, 1992 at 7 :30 P.M. for a final hearing on the major subdivision Hillcrest Estates, Section 2. The hearing has been set for the October meeting rather than the September meeting at the request of the applicant, Harold Reese, Jr. , as he is unable to attend the September meeting. Very truly �yours, / Benn�tOr-Owski, Jr. Chairman S cc: Harold Reese, Jr. g�FFOI/(uA O G 'GFF`•�, ` O ,n l:' :titA( ;4 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS _ " '4 ` '1401 SCOTT�rvH�ARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �,( �,�� 92 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward P.O. B Mark S. McDonald ox 11 Southold, New Yorkk 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 June 11, 1992 Steven Costa Office of Wastewater Management Riverhead County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 E• ajor Subdivision Hillcrest Estates Section II - -2-8.2 Subdivision #823 Dear Mr. Costa: A request for a variance for the above mentioned subdivision was denied by the Board of Review after a hearing that was held on April 25, 1991. The Planning Board has been informed by Paul W. Grosser, consultant for the applicant, that his firm is engaged in negotiations with your office for an acceptable water supply system for the subdivision. It would be appreciated if you would update the Planning Board on the status of the application before you. Thank you in advance for your assistance. t , Very truly yours, a �4,�� 1 3 1992 Bennett Orlowski, J f Chairman T6 iovtN 2 ® S-A/ PFTfR R. 1'AKRAS, P,f. ASS'T. r,1pi,jlPJJ1i,T,H,FFItitCdui'g U h-, - -- _ - = Pt i i � ! 1 -� : k°, .. E: 4= ! � Y:. I :-t �_ t: N .-�-Y i' i • '� �tBFic.E -_ SEN KINZLER :aonotl7iuttN noU4v..t+a D � � l�_—' i,��� aura:a,a (I CHEAT NRC i� k,Nsmvoa><trast,3ot ,1J."�I $ 0 1992 plaa)4ws WWOewn,i Ptli KAHN ""°.,".' W�.ANNIOL BOARD CR xxxx cowEx sx U [� C [� O d � _:..! 2 9 1992 lJ DATE: SOUTNOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD TO: tIC�hDc,stlSc1-Er'X>/,jq ,�-If /dO¢LLL7ShD�GiUrT r�c, /c�triniv�thatd` 07VI0 FROM: FACSIMILE NUMBER: 'e5 7A NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS SHEET) : RE: Mee11'i"-:Q .� Lirn COmrYiUrier��yyj� GJr'�-I '�h�: �pG�'!"d CJ/�1 r,.�' e,67Gt/� C.?yC Who G�rir7 �'ar2 {'Y ,' /S Or) -ffTe r��ll �-O r �act�ry c7rd i.'> rf» 6�r -,�1 ia?� Mr. ,��:-i�J 'r /S i/✓ A �'✓�'/I e:4iv.'SzFd '/4742-�- /�lr, Ktrt�-iGr YVG!srbrd 7 ' a V�1c,� pn �r�c�r ��aSidnS) Avra/ems' lb *3cla ..=r, IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE TIDE ENTIRE TRANSMISSION, PLEASE TELEPHONE OUR OFFICE AT (516) 482,$200, REPLY FACSIMILE (516) 482-2749. Cr'rcUrv�sfrt rlce5� �'{- i'..S /✓rios 1- r, -7�1- fh/S rf-rQtfY- !, rd 'JUrrd y5) 44-1 /1EX ` S [J/e '_7J fn���' -7' zJe r� 17tj4?vziC 0( fir O r^ T • r MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph Lizewski, Chairman Groundwater Resources Committee FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner 6- RE: Ongoing Status of Hillcrest Estates, Section 2: Town Water Management Policy. DATE: June 26, 1992 As per your standing request to be kept informed of any application before the Planning Board that needs public water, please review the attached copies of correspondence. We have been notified that the sponsors of the subject subidivision are seeking access to an existing community water supply that is in private ownership. As you are well aware, the Planning Board has been instructed by the Town Board not to approve subdivisions whose water supply is in private ownership. CC: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman, Planning Board Mark McDonald, Chairman, Water Advisory Committee 17 : 37 FF,C0(Q*5242 PAGE . 9i32 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY E%FCUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARR18, M.D., M.P.H. July 29, 1991 COMMI88KN1ER MT. Harold Reese 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook,N.Y. 11563 D 6 Q d t Dear Mr. Reese: t r 11 Subject: Board of Review Hearing -April 25, 1991 SOUTHOLD Tov Hillcrest Estates,Section 2,Subdivision#823 PLANNING gca o At the hearing on April 25, 1991,you had an opportunity to present your appeal of the department's ruing on the subject application. Based on the following information and in accordance with the provisions of Article 2, Section 760-220,of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code,the determination of the Board of Review is as follows: Statcmlent of Pro„ le u A community-type water supply is required when a realty subdivision is located in an area where groundwaters are non-potable or potentially hazardous in accordance with the requiternnts of Article 6,Section 706-606 (1d)., dings and 7 cts I. Proposed development of a 22.9 acre parcel into twenty lots of 40,0(10 square feet or more. 2. Site is in Groundwater Management Zone 41V. 3. Public water is not available. On-site test wells results (11/88 and 11/89) reveal poor quality water with the levels of the pesticide aldicarb at 9-10 ppb; nitrates 5.0-9.4 mg/l; and carbofuran at 2 ppb; and chloride 27-60 mg/l. The wells were shallow with 20-22 feet of water in well casing. Y25 RARRQ DRIVE EAST NAIJ pA�W,N.Y. 11788 IS,0)348.29pp 92 17 : 32 FRO 35248 � PAGE . 003 Mr. Harold Reese Page Two Subject: Hillcrest Estates,Section 2,Subdivision#823 Findings and Facts tcont'd) 4..Applicant's engineer tested that water use for the subdivision will be approximately 2,200 gpd. Based upon the site size it was pr-ijected that recharge will be 7,900 gpd. 5. Hillcrest Section 1 with 32 lots on 32 acres was approved with private well.Approval was granted 8/83 which predates Department's more restrictive requirements. 6. Applicant is willing to provide covenants for each lot that does not meet drinking water standards and provide point of use individual treatment(reverse osmosis and/or granular activated carbon). 7. Depth to groundwater is about 35-45 feet. 8. Soils are marginal with 3 feet to sand and clay down to 13 feet. 9. Distance to nearest public water supply wells(Browns Hills Estates)is 1200 feet south, south west; groundwater flow is to north. This pulic water supply does not have the capability to provide water service to additional homes. 10. Average lot size is 40,000(+)square feet. 11. Other subdivisions and proposals in the area have been rejected by the department due to the unavailability of an adequate potable water supply. A termination The Board denied the request for the variance. Article 6 is intended to assure that subdivisions have an acceptable water supply, In the judgment of the Board the requested variance would not be in harmony with the general intent of Article 6. Very truly yours, �YY\.r.e. Dennis Moran,P.E. Chairman,Board of Review DM/Ir cc: Mr.Walter 0. Lindley Ms. Susan D. Windesheim Mr. Frank Dowling, Sr. Planner Mr. Thomas C.Wolpert, P.E. Town of Southold Planning Board BEN KIN%LER ,. A'ITO II N F.Y A T I.A W 1010\O NT I I E It N'D 0C 1.I:VA R D _) S U IT F.310 C It EATN'I:C A,N F.W 1108K 11021.5306 (516)4X2.8900 DEDORAU DETII KAIIN May 15, 1992 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman l�1 Planning Board } -�2 f Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road +fit SOUTHOLOTOWN Southold, New York 11971 PLINNINGBOARD Re: Major Subdivision, Hillcrest Estates Section II SCTM 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Orlowski: I am pleased to respond to your letter of April 30, 1992 regarding the above matter, and pursuant to my telephoneconversation today with Melissa Spiro of your office, I wish to summarize the conversation had with her. Incidental to the above-referenced Subdivision Application presently pending before the Planning Board, the applicant made application to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for a variance in respect to water supply requirements. That Application was denied by decision, dated July 29, 1991, a copy of which is enclosed for your review. We have been advised, informally, that the Board of Health would favorably consider our Application upon inclusion of our proposed subdivision into an existing public water supply system. Accordingly, we are actively exploring the possibilites of incorporating our client's proposed subdivision into a nearby existing public water system. We expect to reach some conclusion on this matter in the near future. In the interim, I would repectfully request that the Board continue this pending Application in an active status for a reasonable additional period. We will continue to pursue an approval of an acceptable plan from the Board of Health, or, in the alternative, revise the subdivision application to conform to their /Re: Hillcrest Estates 2 requirements. I would ask that the Planning Board take no action on the Application at this time. Please be assured of our desire and intention to aggressively pursue the pending subdivision Application. Accordingly, we oppose any action by the Board to close their file on this matter. Thank you for your anticipated courtesy. Very truly yours, n Kinzlet� BK:cl Enclosure VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS OI IAUTY F"w o:t'ar.IS;SCYt c-r-,r�tac,�'r IPG OGi¢T. p r: (rnwi kAA^�7O rax !+.rel apv U�UC June 8 , 1992 ((11 11 - .,mal •. J ;9Si2 Town or suutliholl TwW11 Beard SOUTHOLD , TDSJD M.s i n Ik41d PUNNING BDARD :";nuthold, Now York 11971 RQt Hillcrest Est,tca: • Section 2 / 3 - Z - Z �Ctlt 1 CC7Ct1 i The purpose of, r.his Ilett+,r is to inforrl you that. P.W. tosser consulting hat< 1>aen tetdir,Ncl by the develope!re of H111crrp5t Estates yrr;'l. is,n ".o prepare apptxcatiom; t.0 the surtoil< county uepar'tlrent or Hr'aitlt Ses'vic:e5 i.or approv;il o1' the subdivision . We are currently actively ellgaged in neyutiations with the SCDHS for an 44:1:R>,table water supply systei-1 at, the silbdivision, This .1nclud.>s Investigatinq various altornotives for water supply includinrj consolidation with the ne,c..lhborinq Brown's Hill Estates wdtrr t:Olt'Pi)ny , In light of our activity we re* ecttully request that the board continua to hlDld this application open until therct (:An be a ti-solution of the iSZUe£. Please feel free U-, call is you have arty question's or, wish tr., ,llsouss this matter turttiwr. very trulyjyours, paul W. Gro_ser, Pt-ncident 1-WGS ``-�i1� Post•R'pfd,Itilex !rah•.IfUll.':I!n[•hlolbi7.rvorpat;nn> _/ Co. P. ui•vi" ' nl,,,l,c �x« t,trr PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS W �::; : SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �` ' '� �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward ` Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 June 11, 1992 Steven Costa Office of Wastewater Management Riverhead County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Major Subdivision Hillcrest Estates Section II SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Subdivision #823 Dear Mr. Costa: A request for a variance for the above mentioned subdivision was denied by the Board of Review after a hearing that was held on April 25, 1991. The Planning Board has been informed by Paul W. Grosser, consultant for the applicant, that his firm is engaged in negotiations with your office for an acceptable water supply system for the subdivision. It would be appreciated if you would update the Planning Board on the status of the application before you. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Very truly yours, �O/ws Bennett Orlowski, Jr � Chairmans OI IAl1YY r nrJMJL I INC; 1'.171 c7Gl.^.T. M ff Lt u •v p. ni l!MO np0� r.a> 1+.1 e1 r1Hv U�06 June 8 , 1992 `1•own of :;uut.11hultl 'I'i,Wll Board - SOUTHOLD7oW M.1 1 n 1<Ga i PUNNING BOARD :.;niithoId, flew York 11971 tu: Hiilcrest Estate., section 2 / 3 - z - Z Gent letmeen t `Phe purpose of r.his 1 !3ttr. t' is to inform yo;, ttl.II. P.W. r,rosser Consulting nn r; Iref r1 tt•tairnrd Ly the deVcloprars of Hillcrest Estates Ser,LIOn t.o prepare applicat.iom; t.0 the Su 1,t'olk County uepart:setJt of Hiialttt 5ervic:ti�v for apprc,v,11 of the subdivision. We are currently actively elitlaged in neyutiattions with 'the SCDHS for an aCC: ptable water Supply systcr;i at the silt division. This lncludt%s rove--tigat_iny various dl 'ornatiVOS for water supply including Consolidatlorr with the ne,cl)iboring $rpwn' s Hil.t Estates wAte•r t:c'>ml:acrny . In light of our activity we re.areCt.PullY request that the board continue to hald this application Open until 4herr: c:nn be a 11'r,<,lution of the issues. Meese feel free t.c; c-..all if you have arty questlom,r or wish t <. .11r;cuss this matter turthvr' . Very truly /your6, paul W. Grosser, Pref. i dent 1-'WCo: 0704 Post-It'ordnfllay !r{yl1111r1lo !brI -of o,unf• e'_./ WraM o. ae taxr !. o�OgUFFO(�-c 0 S� Gyp C= PLANN4NG BOARD MEMBERS W SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 91• �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 20, 1992 Ben Kinzler 147 Willis Avenue Mineola, New York 11501 RE: Major Subdivision Hillcrest Estates Section II SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The Board received your letter dated May 15, 1992 on May 18, 1992, the same day that the above mentioned file was scheduled to be closed. Due to the late submission, the Board members did not have appropriate time to review the letter before the public meeting. The Board will notify you prior to the next regularly scheduled meeting (June 8th) whether or not the file will be closed on that date. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, T1t/ '75 Chairman BEN KINZLER ATTORNEYATLAW 1010 NORTHERN BOULEVARD Z,Z SUITE 310 GREAT NECK,NEW YORK 11021-5306 (516)482-8300 DEBORAH BETH KAHN May 15, 1992 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Planning Board MA7:MW] Town of Southold Town Hall53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Major Subdivision, Hillcrest Estates Section II, SCTM 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Orlowski: I am pleased to respond to your letter of April 30, 1992 regarding the above matter, and pursuant to my telephone conversation today with Melissa Spiro of your office, I wish to summarize the conversation had with her. Incidental to the above-referenced Subdivision Application presently pending before the Planning Board, the applicant made application to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for a variance in respect to water supply requirements. That Application was denied by decision, dated July 29, 1991, a copy of which is enclosed for your review. We have been advised, informally, that the Board of Health would favorably consider our Application upon inclusion of our proposed subdivision into an existing public water supply system. Accordingly, we are actively exploring the possibilites of incorporating our client's proposed subdivision into a nearby existing public water system. We expect to reach some conclusion on this matter in the near future. In the interim, I would repectfully request that the Board continue this pending Application in an active status for a reasonable additional period. We will continue to pursue an approval of an acceptable plan from the Board of Health, or, in the alternative, revise the subdivision application to conform to their Re: Hillcrest Estates Page 2 requirements. I would ask that the Planning Board take no action on the Application at this time. Please be assured of our desire and intention to aggressively pursue the pending subdivision Application. Accordingly, we oppose any action by the Board to close their file on this matter. Thank you for your anticipated courtesy. Very truly yours, � / I /� C� n Kinzle BK:cl Enclosure VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS MAY ,15• ' 92 17 : 37 FR 935248 • PAGE . 002 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK a PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EIIECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OFF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIM M.D„ M.P.H. July 29, 1991 CoMMIsompA Mr. Harold Reese 855 Sumise Highway Lynbrook,N. Y. 11563 Dear Mr. Reese. 8 1992 MAY I Subject: Board of Review Hearing-April 25, 1991 souTHOLD 10wN Hillcrest Estates,Section 2,Subdivision#823 PLANNING BOARD At the hearing on April 25, 1991,you had an opportunity to present your appeal of the department's ruling on the subject application. Based on the following information and in accordance with the provisions of Article 2, Section 760-220,of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code,the detemtination of the Board of Review is as follows: &Mmgnt of Problem A community-type water supply is required when a realty subdivision is looted in an area where groundwaters are non-potable or potentially hazardous in accordance with the requitenmts of Article 6,Section 706-606(1d). Wings and Facts 1. Proposed development of a 22.9 acre parcel into twenty lots of 40;900 square feet or more. 2. Site is in Groundwater A4anagement Zone#IV, 3. Public water is not available. On-site test wells results (11/88 and 11/89)reveal poor quality water with the levels of the pesticide aldicarb at 9-10 ppb; nitrates 5,0-9.4 mg/l; and carbofuran at 2 ppb; and chloride 27-60 mg/1. The wells were shallow with 20-22 feet of water in well casing, 225 RABRo ORIVE 6 NAUW AVBE,N.V. 11788 (E1 W 3! 900 =MAY 15' ' 92 17 : 38 FRO 9352490 PAGE . 003 Mr. Harold Reese Page Two Subject: Hillcrest Estates, Section 2, Subdivision#823 Findings and Facts tco t'd) 4. Applicant's engineer tested that water use for the subdivision will be approximately 2,200 gpd. Based upon the site size it was projected that recharge will be 7,900 gpd. 5. Hillcrest Section 1 with 32 lots on 32 acres was approved with private well. Approval was granted 8/83 which predates Department's more restrictive requirements. 6. Applicant is willing to provide covenants for each lot that does not meet drinking water standards and provide point of use individual treatment(reverse osmosis and/or granular activated carbon). 7. Depth to groundwater is about 35-45 feet. 8. Soils are marginal with 3 feet to sand and clay down to 13 feet. 9. Distance to nearest public water supply wells(Browns Hills Estates)is 1200 feet south, south west; groundwater flow is to north. This pulic water supply does not have the capability to provide water service to additional homes. 10. Average lot size is 40;000(+)square feet. 11. Other subdivisions and proposals in the area have been rejected by the department due to the unavailability of an adequate potable water supply. A termination The Board denied the request for the variance. Article 6 is intended to,assure that subdivisions have an acceptable water supply. In the judgment of the Board the requested variance would not be in harmony with the general intent of Article 6. Very truly yours, Dennis Moran,P.E. Chairman, Board of Review DM/!r cc: Mr.Walter G. Lindley Ms. Susan D. Windesheim Mr. Frank Dowling,Sr. Planner Mr.Thomas C. Wolpert,P.E. Town of Southold Planning Board A 6111 1 .7A f r. , l PACKAGE r TRACKING,NUMBER OUESTIONS7 CALL 800-238-5335 T LL FREE. 3935498 ~ :'3' 1 Date RECIPIENT'S COPY Ali s — — — — TT mel Please Print for Phone Curti(v, lmpurit To(Recipient s Name) Please Print be.Mery i3 .SIE''-o't G' X05-F1i IZ:�r Jr 1 z 1Il j I' ` Department/FloorNo. Company 1e1t/I Exact Street Addrese(We Cannot Deliver to P D.Bares w A.2P Corse) s ± . �.Ir 3"9r, Mai Stale LP Re"'Ad City State jlPuequ rzd 1L BILLING REFERENCE INFORMATION roptiialal/(First 24 cha taG will appear on invoice.) IF HOLO FOR PICK-UP Pont FEOIX AdAess Nae Street Adaasa Rillsontler z❑and Reopienl'9 FedEx ACd No 3❑am 3m Pro,I'sil Accl No 4❑Bill QeanCard City State ➢P ReNwrea SERVICES DELIVERY AND SPECIAL HANDLING neuea WEIGHT .,A.. Emp.No. Date r �e1 E.Prr, ;heck only one box) (Check services required) u+r ❑Cash Received I h:¢les SlerrOerUOvem gM ❑Rawrn Sn pmenl mw.erurz wureo+n. .r� 1 ❑ HOLD GOR PICK UP ea n; �TprU Parry ❑Ch,ToPel. ❑CNg.To nod Ill 1' ^dVelue 51 ❑ aIT PACKAGING 2 DELIVER WEEKDAY Street Address GING Ty�D� ❑ LETTER56 LJ FEDEXLETTER' 3 DELI VER SATURDAY mva h,,get 11A Moi moat—'.—rro l PAK' 52❑FEDEX FAK' 4❑ DANGEROUS GOODS mva mame� City Slate ZAP TI�e 2 53 FEDEX BOX 5 Total Total Total 'BOX ❑ ❑ Received By 'r a1 i:nantes 'TUBE 54❑FEOEXTUBE 6 DRYXE m: _ rvo-NY oGasha l rnlght � DIM SHIPMENT IOl..ahie.1 It x ❑ PACKAGEur , T OTHER SPECIAL SERVICE. Date/Time Received FedEx Employee Number REVISION DATE 61 I'll i 1.099 Nr 'MY 46❑L�Eq 0❑ i �� _. ltzti FORMAT p099 GOVT SATURDAY PICKUP 099 41 9❑ ., x x Fegbr saill 10 111, AN Release ' 981.91 FEG Ic�a1 yr 1 P.opO Signature: — FN DIN eP❑FREIGHTlan, l t1 ❑ E, DELIVERY i mioiooi E mE" D.te;lime� n 4_ as Fed HOLIDAY DELIVERY No y Ubi�V 1601 12❑ 2L1U Le StI 7 _�_ t. ItOUNTY OF SUFFOLK CC 0 C,k-, PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER January 28 , 1991 Mr. Harold Reese 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, New York 11563 RE: Proposed Subdivision of Hillcrest Estates , Section 2 , #823 , (T) Southold (SCTM 1000-13-2 ) Dear Mr. Reese: Your request to appear before the Board of Review of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services has been received. The review of this case has been scheduled for February 7 , 1991 , at 2 : 30 p.m. , in the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Conference Room, County Center, Room N-204 , Riverhead. You and interested parties are requested to appear, with or without counsel , and you may produce any information or evidence concerning the above referenced property. Should you have any questions, please call Walter G. Lindley at 516-548-3312 . Very truly yours , Dennis Moran, P .E . Chairman Board of Review DM:cah cc : Mr. James L. Corbin Mr. Martin Trent Ms . Susan Windesheim Mr . Walter G. Lindley Mr. Frank Dowlinq, Sr. Planner Town of Southold !,Planning Board 1 '! ( 4 ' COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD, N.V. 11801 Page 2 Hillcrest Estates Section II Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Ve(r�y" truly yours, n Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman encl. c -PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti ,,.� ,rj ;` SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 28 , 1991 CERTIFIED MAIL Harold Reese Jr. 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, New York 11563 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Hillcrest Estates, Section 2 SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Reese: The Planning Board has received a copy of the Department of Health Services ' denial of your request for a variance in regard to Article 6 for the above mentioned subdivision. Please indicate, in writing, if you intend to pursue an alternate means of providing an acceptable water supply. Also, the Planning Board has not received information requested in their letter of December 29 , 1988 , a copy of which is enclosed for your convenience. If the Planning Board does not receive a written response to this letter by September 30 , 1991 , we will assume that you are not proceeding with this application, and the file will be closed at the next scheduled public meeting after that date. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski , it -A Chairman enc. C IL U Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1 179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (5 16)765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 29 , 1988 Harold Reese, Sr. 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, NY 11563 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision for Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 SCTM# .1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Reese; The Planning Board received the application fee, Long Environmental Form and maps submitted on December 22 , 1988. Please refer 'to the Planning Board' s letter of August 25, 1988 which requests additional information. A copy of this letter is enclosed for your review. The latest submission complies only with number 5 of the letter. As stated in that letter, the Board asked for revisions to be made to Hill Crest Drive North and for the tap road to be relocated. The Board is not in favor of creating a four way intersection and would like the tap road to be designed between lots 34 and 35. Upon submission of revised maps showing the additional information, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, IIENNETT ORLO%gSK;,._JR:- •!� ✓ .�_�, `CIIAIRf9AN !/� enc. • I �o��SpFFO(,�coG ZZ y� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS W SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman y ® .. �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 30, 1992 CERTIFIED MAIL Ben Kinzler 147 Willis Avenue Mineola, New York 11501 RE: Major Subdivision Hillcrest Estates Section II SCTM# 1000-13-2-8.2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: As of this date the Planning Board has not received any response to its letter of October 21, 1991. An additional copy of the letter is enclosed for your convenience. Accordingly, the file will be closed at the Planning Board' s May 18, 1992 public meeting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Benn�rlowski, Jr/. Chairman Encl. cc: Harold Reese Jr. (Certified Mail) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 4t N w "�g SCOTT L. HARRIS ,j "' ��, �,• ,j Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman P ervisor t' � � � ��'•' � Su George Ritchie Latham, Jr. . '� Richard G. Ward 'A Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 ortober 21, 1991 Ben Kinzler 147 Willis Avenue Mineola, New York 11501 RE: Major Subdivision Hillcrest Estates Section II SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The Planning Board has reviewed your response to their August 28, 1991 correspondence. Please be advised that Health Department approval is not the only outstanding item for final approval of this subdivision. As stated in the Board' s August 28th letter, other information that had been requested in previous Planning Board correspondence has yet to be submitted. Copies of the Planning Board' s correspondence dated August 28, 1991, December 29 , 1988, and August 25, 1988 are enclosed for your convenience. The State Environmental Quality Review Act must be completed for Section II . Upon submission of maps that have been revised in accordance with the Planning Board' s enclosed correspondence, the Board will make a final SEQRA determination. In addition, the Planning Board will be referring the Long Environmental Assessment Form to their Environmental Consultant for review. Your client will be responsible for submitting the $400 . 00 review fee. The fee must be received before the Planning Board will authorize its consultant to proceed with the review. The Board will allow you an additional 6 months from the date of this letter to submit the outstanding items for this subdivision. If all items are not submitted within this time frame, we will assume that your client does not wish to proceed with this application, and the file will be scheduled to be closed. COUNTY OF SUFFOR a. PATRICK G. H SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS. M.D.• M.P.H. COMMISSIONER April 9, 1991 Mr. Harold Reese 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, New York 11563 RE: Proposed Subdivision of Hillcrest Estates, Section 2, #823, (T) Southold (SCTM 1000-13-2) Dear Mr. Reese: Your request to appear before the Board of Review of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services has been received. The review of this case has been scheduled for April 25, 1991, at 2: 00 p.m. , in the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Conference Room, County Center, Room S-238, Riverhead. You and interested parties are requested to appear, with or without counsel, and you may produce any information or evidence concerning the above referenced property. Should you have any questions, please call Walter G. Lindley at 516-548-3312. Very truly yours, Dennis Moran, P.E. Chairman Board of Review DM:cah cc: Mr. James L. Corbin Mr. Steven Cary, P.E. Mr. Walter G. Lindley Ms. Susan D. Windesheim '; Mr. Frank Dowling, Sr. Planner Mr. Thomas C. Wo'lpert, P.E. Town of Southold Planning Board COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD, N.V. 11901 J Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 ��;Q/� '.,�^,,Y Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 25 , 1988 Harold Reese 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, NY 11563 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision for Hill Crest Estates , Section 2 SCTM #1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Reese Enclosed please find a marked copy of the above mentioned subdivision. As stated on the map the following in formation is required before the Board can proceed with their review. 1 . A topography map, at 21 intervals . 2 . The bluff line must be shown on the map. 3 . Building envelopes .must be shown on all lots. 4. All lot widths must be 150 ' minimum. 5. a completed long environmental assessment form; copy enclosed. Please see map for additional revisions pertaining to extending Hill Crest Drive North and relocating the tap road. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours , G-li f BENNETT ORLOWSKI ,JR. CHAIRMAN cc: Michael Hall enc: Gy<zzd 4 C4 r._ ,z `' SCOTT L. HARRIS PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS � rr� Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor�,;<,` � -� .�•, George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward , i Town Hall, 53095 Main Road >r _ '` P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 nrtober 21 , 1991 Ben Kinzler 147 Willis Avenue Mineola, New York 11501 RE: Major Subdivision Hillcrest Estates Section II sCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The Planning Board has reviewed your response to their August 28 , 1991 correspondence. Please be advised that Health Department approval is not the only outstanding item for final approval of this subdivision. As stated in the Board' s August 28th letter, other information that had been requested in previous Planning Board correspondence has yet to be submitted. Copies of the Planning Board' s correspondence dated August 28 , 1991, December 29 , 1988 , and August 25, 1988 are enclosed for your convenience. The State Environmental Quality Review Act must be completed for Section II . Upon submission of maps that have been revised in accordance with the Planning Board' s enclosed correspondence, the Board will make a final SEQRA determination. In addition, the Planning Board will be referring the Long Environmental Assessment Form to their Environmental Consultant for review. Your client will be responsible for submitting the $400. 00 review fee. The fee must be received before the Planning Board will authorize its consultant to proceed with the review. The Board will allow you an additional 6 months from the date of this letter to submit the outstanding items for this subdivision. If all items are not submitted within this time frame, we will assume that your client does not wish to proceed with this application, and the file will be scheduled to be closed. Page 2 Hillcrest Estates Section II Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. �^S Chairman • encl. D , , t 1 N" Fr ,O SCOTT L. HARRIS PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. `? Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 28, 1991 CERTIFIED MAIL Harold Reese Jr. 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, New York 11563 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Hillcrest Estates, Section 2 SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Reese: The Planning "Board has received a copy of the Department of Health Services' denial of your request for a variance in regard to Article 6 for the above mentioned subdivision. Please indicate, in writing, if you intend to pursue an alternate means of providing an acceptable water supply. Also, the Planning Board has not received information requested in their letter of December 29 , 1988 , a copy of which is enclosed for your convenience. If the Planning Board does not receive a written response to this letter by September 30, 1991 , we will assume that you are not proceeding with this application, and the file will be closed at the next scheduled public meeting after that date. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, ,,,�ati �. Bennett Orlowski , Jr Chairman enc. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road a�1 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (5 16)765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 29 , 1988 Harold Reese, Sr. 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, NY 11563 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision for Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Reese; The Planning Board received the application fee, Long Environmental Form and maps submitted on December 22 , 1988 . Please refer 'to the Planning Board' s letter of August 25, 1988 which requests additional information. A copy of this letter is enclosed for your review. The latest submission complies only with number 5 of the letter. As stated in that letter, the Board asked for revisions to be made to Hill Crest Drive North and for the tap road to be relocated. The Board is not in favor of creating a four way intersection and would like the tap road to be designed between lots 34 and 35. Upon submission of revised maps showing the additional information, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKS,. .JR: j � •.�_.. \.CHAIRMAN lit enc. J. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road 5y a #Il ys -,ry P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE x✓'j' (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 25 , 1988 Harold Reese 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, NY 11563 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision for Hill Crest Estates , Section 2 SCTM 41000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Reese Enclosed please find a marked copy of the above mentioned subdivision. As stated on the map the following in formation is required before the Board can proceed with their review. 1 . A topography map, at 21 intervals. 2 . The bluff line must be shown on the map. 3 . Building envelopes .must be shown on all lots. 4 . All lot widths must be 150 ' minimum. 5, a completed long environmental assessment form; copy enclosed. Please see map for additional revisions pertaining to extending Hill Crest Drive North and relocating the tap road. If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours , -Ertl%t/✓'5 ��i�.�GL BENNETT ORLOWSKI ,JR. CHAIRMAN cc: Michael Hall enc: BEN KINZLER ATTORNEY AT LAW � 147 WILLIS AVENUE MINEOLA, NEW YORK 11601 (616)046-7788 DEBORAH BETH KAHN FAX(516) 746-0328 September 17, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision application of Hillcrest Estates SCTM# 1000-13-2-8 . 2 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Our client, Harold Reese, has received your letter of August 28 , 1991 inquiring as to the status of their application in the above matter and has forwarded same to us for a reply. Please be advised that our client has every intention of proceeding with this application before the Town of Southold and it is therefore requested that such application remain open and active. We are presently reviewing the determination of the Suffolk County, Department of Health in this matter and will evaluate same along with other alternative methods of compliance. In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully requested that this matter remain active and open and that you mark your files accordingly. ery t my yours, BK:df BEN IN ER �► 2 51961 %g�yFF04e'4 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 'x SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman � George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Q s>�` �' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward 'ren�c a= P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 28, 1991 CERTIFIED MAIL Harold Reese Jr. 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, New York 11563 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Hillcrest Estates, Section 2 SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Reese: The Planning 'Board has received a copy of the Department of Health Services' denial of your request for a variance in regard to Article 6 for the above mentioned subdivision. Please indicate, in writing, if you intend to pursue an alternate means of providing an acceptable water supply. Also, the Planning Board has not received information requested in their letter of December 29, 1988, a copy of which is enclosed for your convenience. If the Planning Board does not receive a written response to this letter by September 30, 1991, we will assume that you are not proceeding with this application, and the file will be closed at the next scheduled public meeting after that date. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr 05 Chairman enc. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 29 , 1988 Harold Reese, Sr. 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, NY 11563 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision for Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Reese; The Planning Board received the application fee, Long Environmental Form and maps submitted on December 22 , 1988 . Please refer 'to the Planning Board' s letter of August 25, 1988 which requests additional information. A copy of this letter is enclosed for your review. The latest submission complies only with number 5 of the letter. As stated in that letter, the Board asked for revisions to be made to Hill Crest Drive North and for the tap road to be relocated. The Board is not in favor of creating a four way intersection and would like the tap road to be designed between lots 34 and 35. Upon submission of revised maps showing the additional information, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSK:,..-JR-i- r`CHAIRMAN i enc. WUNTY OF SUFFOLK StiCr3�c� PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER July 29, 1991 Mr. Harold Reese 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook,N. Y. 11563 Dear Mr. Reese: Subject: Board of Review Hearing-April 25, 1991 Hillcrest Estates, Section 2, Subdivision#823 At the heating on April 25, 1991, you had an opportunity to present your appeal of the department's ruling on the subject application. Based on the following information and in accordance with the provisions of Article 2, Section 760-220, of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, the determination of the Board of Review is as follows: Statement of Problem A community-type water supply is required when a realty subdivision is located in an area where groundwaters are non-potable or potentially hazardous in accordance with the requiremnts of Article 6,Section 706-606 (ld). Findings and Facts I. Proposed development of a 22.9 acre parcel into twenty lots of 40,000 square feet or more. 2. Site is in Groundwater Management Zone#IV. 3. Public water is not available. On-site test wells results (11/88 and 11/89)reveal poor quality water with the levels of the pesticide aldicarb at 9-10 ppb; nitrates 5.0-9.4 mg/l; and carbofuran at 2 ppb; and chloride 27-60 mg/1.The wells were shallow with 20-22 feet of water in well casing. _ 8 225 RASRO DRIVE EAST HAUPPAUOE. N.Y. 11 769 (51613 -2D Mr. Harold Reese Page Two Subject: Hillcrest Estates, Section 2, Subdivision#823 Findings and Facts (cont'd) 4. Applicant's engineer testified that water use for the subdivision will be approximately 2,200 gpd. Based upon the site size it was projected that recharge will be 7,900 gpd. 5. Hillcrest Section I with 32 lots on 32 acres was approved with private well. Approval was granted 8/83 which predates Department's more restrictive requirements. 6. Applicant is willing to provide covenants for each lot that does not meet drinking water standards and provide point of use individual treatment(reverse osmosis and/or granular activated carbon). 7. Depth to groundwater is about 35-45 feet. 8. Soils are marginal with 3 feet to sand and clay down to 13 feet. 9. Distance to nearest public water supply wells (Browns Hills Estates)is 1200 feet south, south west; groundwater flow is to north.This pulic water supply does not have the capability to provide water service to additional homes. 10. Average lot size is 40,000 (+) square feet. 11. Other subdivisions and proposals in the area have been rejected by the department due to the unavailability of an adequate potable water supply. Determination The Board denied the request for the variance. Article 6 is intended to assure that subdivisions have an acceptable water supply. In the judgment of the Board the requested variance would not be in harmony with the general intent of Article 6. Very truly yours, y�/ Dennis Moran, P.E. Chairman,Board of Review DM/Ir cc: Mr. Walter G. Lindley Ms. Susan D. Windesheim Mr. Frank Dowling, Sr. Planner Mr.Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. Town of Southold Planning Board � < rc 74. Ni' �t Town Hall, 53095 Main Road T P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 y °14 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 25, 1988 Harold Reese 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, NY 11563 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision for Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 SCTM #1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Reese Enclosed please find a marked copy of the above mentioned subdivision. As stated on the map the following in formation is required before the Board can proceed with their review. 1 . A topography map, at 2 ' intervals. 2 . The bluff line must be shown on the map. 3 . Building envelopes -must be shown on all lots. 4. All lot widths must be 150 ' minimum. 5. a completed long environmental assessment form; copy enclosed. Please see map for additional revisions pertaining to extending Hill Crest Drive North and relocating the tap road. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, G'r BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. cc: Michael Hall CHAIRMAN enc: ��o5�FF0(X��Gy O r T Town Hall, 53095 Main Road in 4 P.O. Box 1179 Q Southold, New York 11971 ! TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 29, 1988 Harold Reese, Sr. 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, NY 11563 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision for Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 SCTM# 1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Reese; The Planning Board received the application fee, Long Environmental Form and maps submitted on December 22 , 1988. Please refer to the Planning Board' s letter of August 25, 1988 which requests additional information. A copy of this letter is enclosed for your review. The latest submission complies only with number 5 of the letter. As stated in that letter, the Board asked for revisions to be made to Hill Crest Drive North and for the tap road to be relocated. The Board is not in favor of creating a four way intersection and would like the tap road to be designed between lots 34 and 35. Upon submission of revised maps showing the additional information, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, 3 ii BENNETT ORLOWSK;, ..JR. '- CHAIRMAN enc. YOUNG T, YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK uyol 616-7$T-2989 ALDEN W.YOUNG 4 HOWARD W.YOUNG Pw6eeeional Engineer 4F Land SuNeyor 2 ,J ._.._.._..._....__,._._..-..... December 13, 1988 2 Z ,.' Mr. Harold Reese 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, New York 11563 RE: Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 Main Road Orient, Town of Southold, New York Dear Mr. Reese: Enclosed herewith please find completed State Environmental Quality Review Full Environmental Assessment Form, for the above captioned, for your use. Very truly yours, / llaa�JlC �2�1 Howard W. Young HW /kak \ EncT. iteese ilros. fur. 855 SUNRISE HIGHWAY LYNBROOK.N.Y. 11563 516-593.5200 �� � I.ININC, � o � R7 fv4K p r �oui Hv�-7 Sew-t 140 1 P j We it-7 6 hr H R To R 'V u% 7) 1 q[S r o,4 C �}�t_L� REs,�T ES llt-to-Es Sic Lei Q P,? 1) k1C flow M ►? TamIs rvn, CG Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 �� ZF Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 25, 1988 Harold Reese 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, NY 11563 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision for Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 SCTM *1000-13-2-8. 2 Dear Mr. Reese Enclosed please find a marked copy of the above mentioned subdivision. As stated on the map the following in formation is required before the Board can proceed with their review. 1 . A topography map, at 2 ' intervals. 2 . The bluff line must be shown on the map. 3 . Building envelopes .must be shown on all lots. 4. All lot widths must be 150 ' minimum. 5. a completed long environmental assessment form; copy enclosed. Please see map for additional revisions pertaining to extending Hill Crest Drive North and relocating the tap road. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, -Gi-tom+t kTORIOWS2,lJetR^� BENNE . CHAIRMAN cc: Michael Hall enc: i � Qm � n APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OP AT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: "— T The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 11�I 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . . .n .2 . .... .. .... .. ... . . .... . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. .. . . .... . .. . . . . .. . . . . . 1 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) - 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk Countv Clerk's office as follows: Liber . .. . . ..0.3.07 . . . . .. . . . . . Page . . Liber . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . . ... Page . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. On Liber . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . Page Liber . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . On Liber . .. . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . .. . Page . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . or as distributee . .. .. .. . . . . . . . ... .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . ... .. . ... ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . 5. The area of the land is . .. .. .Y4.9.1 , , , , , acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . I . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 7. The land is encumbered by mortgage (s) as follows: . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .. . . .. . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . in original amount of $. . . . . . . . . . . . . . unpaid amount $ . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . held by . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber Page in original amount of . . . .. . . .. . . . . . unpaid amount S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . held by . . . . . . . .. .. . . . address .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . w (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Page . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . in original amount of . .. .... .. .. .. . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . held by . .. .. .. . . .. . . .. .. . . . .. . .. .. .. . . .. .... .. .. . . . address . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except . 7777. . . .. . . . . . . .. ... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .... .. . . ..... . ..... .. . . . .. . 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts IW�4, . ... . . . A v. .. .(.�.�7777 . . . . . . . ........ . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. ... .. . . . . .. . .. .. . 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex. cept . .. .. . . .. ... . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) floes not) lie in a Nater District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . 13. Water mains will be laid by . . . . . . . . and (a) (no) charge twill be made for installing said Imains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by 7777! r. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . ... . . . �'CD . .. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . • . . . . . . and (a) (no charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by . . . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County IIightcay system, annex Schedule "LB" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on'the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets it, the, Town of Southold Iti1 h I s%'stent, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existin- buildings or structures on the land whictl are not located and shown on the plat- l9. Where the plat shutes proposed streets 1% hich are extensions of streets oil adioininq sub- division neaps heretofore filed, there are no I—ert'e strips at the end of the streets nit said existing maps at their conjunctions %lith cite proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proccedin gs, the spPlietnt will offer proof of title as required b% Sec. 335 of the Kcal Property Law.."� 21. Submit a cop%• of proposed deed for lots showing all rrstrictiuns, cotenants, etc. _Aniiex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $. IN aQ P!lt itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at . .. .j . .. . . . . . years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE . ... .�.4u+=.. .d�.. b Yprioo. QoH�9 �ctRI I (�Ir2 �Fe F 151 . S _ $ . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . (Name of Applicant) By . .. .D9.src?el (Signature and Title) S4 . . . . .. (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF .��Q Q cLGL/' ss On the . . . .'??5. .. .. .. .. . day of. A?Zc,. , . . , , , , before me personally came lxi�� to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . . . . . executed the saine. L�- :'otary Public JEAN M. McOERMUTT NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . . . . . . No.01MC4848629 1"Itfled In Nassau Cqunty Commission Expires Feb. 17, 19& On the . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . day . . . . . . . . . . . . of 19. .. . . ., before me personally came • . • . • . • . • • . . . . . to me known, who being by me duly sworn (lid de- pose and say that . . . . . . . . . . . . resides at No. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . that is the . . . . . of the corporation described in and which executed the fureoinz; instrument; that . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . I:now, th(• ,cal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. ,u:�l ;list . . . . . . . . . . . . .<igned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . name thereto bw like order. Notary Public SCHEDULE E $45,000 LILCO 7,500 TELEPHONE 7,500 T.V. 40,000 CURBS 5,000 TREES 25,000 GRADING 80,000 ASPHALT DRAINAGE MISC,and 40,000 $250,000 P IL I FOLIr TO E' 1S() F D S y 231 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 15, 1988 Harold Reese,Sr. Reese Bros. Inc. 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, NY 11563 RE: Hillcrest Estates, Sect. 2 SCTM #1000-13-2-8. 39 #1000-13-2-1,3, 8 Dear Mr. Reese: The following is the status of the above mentioned subdivision. Section 2 of Hillcrest Estates does not have final approval. There is no record of fee being paid for the final application. There is no recgrd of Health Department approval. This must be pursued by the applicant. Upon responses to the above comments the Planning Board will proceed with their review of the application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, CHAIRMAN jt MEMORANDUM TO: ..FILE FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: 14at &zE. FA-#- � ScT6+2 �-' DATE: 'Z-) /1,97, 4 /tA- /, PLO d /off P I . TO . D S Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 11, 1988 Robert W. Brown Sidney B. Bowne and Son 45 Manor Road Smithtown, NY 11787 RE: Hillcrest Estates Section 2 SCTM #►1000-13-2-8.39 Dear Mr. Brown: Please notify your staff that engineering review of road construction should be confined to Section 1 of Hillcrest Estates. Section 2 has not received any final approvals. Further, there is no performance bond or liability insurance posted for Section 2. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, 7/J Valerie Scop z Town Planner cc: Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Judith Terry, Town Clerk James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney jt WD W SIDNEY B. BOWNE S SON A G U 198} Sidneyoders B.Bowne,P.E..L.S. C�__,,,/�„-,. -- 311A1.I-- "Cocc """..`..�.- I p Roger�.Cocchi (192&1959) l� 'a(6 . 3 8 Chester C Kelsey, P.E.,L.S. '�/ Francis J.Lynch 45 Manor Road ) •& Philip5chlotegman Alexandre to Mer,P P.E. Joseph F. vena n Robert A.Stanton, P.E. Snu1h10Wn, N.Y. 11787 Paul F.Stevens Robert W. Brown,L.S. (516) 724-0611 W them T.Styne Zabdiel A. Blackman, P.E., L.S. Richard B.Weber George A.Style,P.E. Jerry D.Almon,P.E. George L.Fagan,Jr„Ph.D.,P.E. August 3, 1987 Frank Capobianco,C.E. 9 Thomas R. Pynchon, L.S. Mr. Bennet Orlowski , Jr., Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: "Hill Crest Estates, Section 2," Main Road , Orient, Town of Southold, New York. (SBB NO. 87112) Gentlemen: We are in receipt of the revised road profile prepared for a portion of Heath Drive by Young & Young, L.S. and find no objection to this layout. We hereby recommend approval to the plan dated June 22, 1987 (revised July 28, 1987) with copies enclosed for your files. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING*PHM. ENGINEERS BE : SMH:cl g Encl . MINEOLA a SMITHTOWN a NEW YORK CITY a CLEARWATER An Equal OpMoluolty Employer M/FM YOUNG aoo OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK ugof 516727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG PM6.i0na1 Surveyor Cara Suaveyor July 29, 1987 Sidney B. Bowne & Son, L.S. 45 Manor Road Smithtown, New York 11787 ATT: Stephen M. Hrbek Bob Brown RE: Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 Main Road Orient, New York Gentlemen: Enclosed herewith please find four (4) prints of the Road profile prepared for a portion of Heath Drive, which we have amended to show proposed grade at each station. Very truly yours, � I Howard W. Young` " 1 HW1(�ak Encs. cc: Mr. Harold Reese + 1 print map;c,elved in 451(2 'UNG � YOUNG 400 06TRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK uyor 616.727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG i IOWARD W.YOUNG Po f6svional Eng4 r%} Land 8=c ym La A Suwyor July 21 , 1987 Sidney B. Bowne & Son, L.S. 45 Manor Road Smithtown, New York 11787 ATTN: Mr. Bob Brown RE: Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 Main Road, Orient, New York Dear Bob, Enclosed herewith please find three (3) prints of the road profile of a portion of Heath Drive (Hill Crest) which has been amended July 21 , 1987, as discussed. Please let us know if this meets with your approval and that of the Town. Very truly yours, Zf Howard W. Young- HW Lip Encl . P NSC �Y T < i OLD S , sy9���Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 25 , 1987 Mrs. G. McLean Blue Marlin Drive Southold, NY 11971 Re: Hill Crest Estates Section II Dear Mrs . McLean; Enclosed are the surveys and Article 6 application which you left with our office on the above mentioned subdivision. As per our conversation, the Planning Board does not directly deal with the Health Department in the application for Article 6 , the applicant must directly obtain the approval. I am mailing this to you since you must be busy and have not had an opportunity to come to the office. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD 7'1 Q kt-1 By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. YOUNG 4r YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK tipot 516727.4903 ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG Pcofessw,wl.Eagiawe 9F Land Sawaym Cand. &.fty. September 9, 1986 Mr. Harold Reese, Jr. 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, New York, 11563 Dear Mr. Reese, Enclosed herewith please find Application for Approval of Realty Subdivisions & Development and Realty Subdivision & Development Environmental Assessment Questionnaire and Pour (4) prints of SUBDIVISION MAP OF HILL CREST ESTATES, SECTION 2 at Orient, Town of Southold, New York, for your use. Very truly yours, v Howard W. Young HWYX'et Encs. SUFFOLK COLIN , f DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES „ WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SECTION a } COUNTY CENTER �i+ ,- RIVERHEAD NEW YORK 11901 x ryt ,r ',� '* m , 'Mzi.{ I kr; ,h:;, + 6 ., '' lay z `d ,e�G�}, ✓ �^ '1a�,f1`>r ''. ' I Xj.# REALTY SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT QUESTNNAIRE a } " (Please type or print the followinginformation) *' IOr, ii' NAME OFV SUBDIVISION OR DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY TAX MAP NUMBER g Xlr N' 1 ;yf r + ' �$ I- �? a W1 Y a�+�g J`TA7"GSI� ntU��C.T/Onl 2 a :. as'��4�,a 1 PROPERTY, LOCATION V466tGE-AND/OR TOWN) ., ty=k"r ''QM�'� �1+V 4'�tA/ �a :',1q 'f." . .;. .: e.,, � -'i 3�' +k Y ft• OWNERS NAME (INDIVIDUALS CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP OWNING PROPERTY) 42"1,'° 120 ceO �C7�S� i✓IP ' " �V�9L0 ��Ec3� - "�•h`/2/STiivts . � ka MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NUMBER f' 1i rr.Ag ? .,.y.:+'•Y /56.3 §Please answer all of the following questions by marking the appropriate box „ p k�Al YES NO y 9P q K, ;;I ,Are ankl of the followin ermits re cared? .....-.. .. . FT ✓ " a. Wiid Scenic and Recreation Rivers Permit- NYSDEC �y sY b. Long (sland Well/Water Supply Permit- NYSDEC ............................................."" '..... ----.. c, Protection,of We Permit- NYSDEC ..:...................... -....---. -... � d. Tidal Wetlands Permit- NYSDEC . . . ....... .........:_.--:- ...:--- --...::..` ............................... r e. Fresh Water Wetlands Permit- NYS�,(;>---- --- f. SEORA Determination -SCDHS/T(owrr..................................................... 2. Will project result In large physical change to the project site,physically alter more than 10 acres of land or alter any unique or unusual land form? ----------------_.................................................................. . 3. . .---. --_....-....-- 3. Will project alter or have any effect on an existing body of water? i 4. Will project have a potentially large impact on groundwater quality "Q' . y 5. Will project significantly affect drainage flow on adjacent sites? ......................................... 4 „ 6. Will project affect-any threatened or endangered plant or animal species 777 7. Will project result In a'major adverse effect on air quality? ...... "— 8. Will project have a majoreffect on visual characterof thecommunity,scenicviews orvistas known to be important to the community? .............. .. . ...••• • ------- 9. Will project adversely'impact any site or structure of historic, pre historic, or paleontological ` > importance or any site designated as a critical environmental area by local agency? 10. Will project have a major effect on existing or future recreational opportunities? 11. Will project result in major traffic problems or cause a major effect to existing transportation systems? ........................................., j} v rf. 12. Will project regularly cause objectionable odors, noise, glare,vibration or electrical disturbance as a result of the project's operation? ..............................................-------.....-.-........----------------....-...-------- 13. Will project have any impact on public health or safety? ........................._ - ---_--. .......... 14. Will project affect the existing community by directly causing a growth in permanent population of more than 5 percent over a one-year period? ..................... .:. ............................ 15. Is there public controversy concerning the project? ..:..::...... OWNER'S SIGNATURE �O.—A� �}t r� DATE_ a W ,f WWM-024(6/85) fvi�p,yl p SY� �� Yu ,�d f �•�: �h � � jd) // .. �. r `'c � lCI . ; � � � ��` n ,T i_ � �_; r ..,r rj p y ,-�:^ ,, L ., ��� rbc_ �� l� . ��, ,_.. . ,r r� �, I 'JUL, i�uti To: Raymond L. Jacobs, Superintendent Report No. 522 Southold Town Highway Department From: John W. Davis Date: June 30, 1986 Re: Hillcrest Estates - Sections I and II Comments: For the past three months intermittant grading and drainage installations have been continued on the above two sections. All drainage structures and pipe lines for both sections have been placed as shown on the plans with exception of the installations on the connection of Soundview Drive to Brown's Hill Road. This road section was deleted as agreed to by the Superintendent in 1985. Rough grading is 70±7 complete in both sections except for the extension of Heath Drive from Soundview Drive to the end (approximately Sta 14 to Sta 22) where no clearing and grading has been done. Recharge basin excavation and forming berms and slopes about 657 complete. A considerable amount of road sloping behind curbs throughout remains to be done. The stockpile of clay on Hill Creek Drive (interference to curb construction) has been moved enough to place curbs. I have had time to make brief inspections of work on this project. Drainage and grading operations have been acceptable to date. Note: There is no bond estimate for Section II. The upper section of Heath Drive in Section II shows a right angle turn on a 107 grade which was probably overlooked when the plans were reviewed. Provided the 107 grade cannot be reduced the curb grades should be banked properly to overcome a bad situation. Young and Young began curb stakeouts today starting at the State Highway and Heath Drive. John W. Davis cc: Southold Town Planning Board Highway Committee L. M. Tuthill, P.E. JUL 2 *86 To: Raymond L. Jacobs, Superintendent Report No. 529 Southold Town Highway Department From: John W. Davis Date: July 21, 1986 Re: Hillcrest Estates at Orient - Section I and II Comments: The following inspections and dates of same regrading and curb installations as follows: July 1/86: Two Young & Young survey parties staking curb on Heath Drive and Hillcrest Drive. Grading operation (dozer only) continued on Hillcrest Drive North. July 3/86: Young & Young survey party continue curb staking on Hillcrest Drive. Found error in curb line at intersection with Heath Drive and Hillcrest Drive. C.B. No. 14 had been located on the property line radius instead of curb line radius. The C.B. was relocated and pipe line realigned properly. July 5/86: Completed work on correct location of C.B. No. 14. Continue grading operation behind curbs. July 7/86: Curb contractor (Mellos) began curb installation today on Heath Drive starting at State Highway with a 10 man crew. Grading operation 2 man crew same as 7/5/86. July 8/9/10/ 11/14/15/16/86: Curb was installed and inspected on these dates. On 7/16/86 all curb had been placed where staked out. Curb contractor will not return until additional reference stakes are placed. Grading continued on roads, behind curbs, etc. on same dates in Section I and II. The curb on Section I is 957± in place to date. The workmanship by Mellos has been acceptable. Road grading as done prior to curb installation now shows a considerable amount of corrective work. Dozer grading with no additional help (ground man) is not too accurate with only center line grade stakes. Road material prior to curbs had been blended for the application of pulvermix oil. When corrective work is done - (some places show the grades to the top of curbs and over) , blending of the base course will have to be repeated. The owner's grading contractor is aware of this situation. In discussions with Mr. Reese, he intends to complete all road work for Sections I and II this year. There are steep grades on this project and without pavement in place curbs can be damaged by erosion and washouts from heavy rainfall. To date Lilco and telephone cables have not been installed_. / J John W. Davis cc: Southold Town Planning Board Highway Committee L. M. Tuthill, P.E. JUL 3 1986 To: Raymond L. Jacobs , Superintendent Report No. 522 Southold Town Highway Department From: John W. Davis Date: June 30, 1986 Re: Hillcrest Estates - Sections I and 11 Comments : For the past three months intermi.ttant grading and drainage installations have been continued onthe abovetwo sections . All drainage structures and pipe lines for both sections have been placed as shown on the plans with exception of the installations on the connection of Soundview Drive to Brown 's Hill Road. This road section was deleted as agreed to by the Superintendent in 1985. Rough grading is 70±7 complete in both sections except for the extension of Heath Drive from Soundview Drive to the end (approximately Sta 14 to Sta 22) where no clearing and grading has been done. Recharge basin excavation and forming berms and slopes about 657 complete . A considerable amount of road sloping behind curbs throughout remains to be done. The stockpile of clay on Hill Creek Drive (interference to curb construction) has been moved enough to place curbs . 1 have had time to make brief inspections of work on this project . Drainage and grading operations have been acceptable to date. Note: There is no bond estimate for Section 11 . The upper section of Heath Drive in Section 11 shows a right angle turn on a 107 grade which was probably overlooked when the plans were reviewed. Provided the 107 grade cannot be reduced the curb grades should be banked properly to overcome a bad situation. Young and Young began curb stakeouts today starting at the. State Highway and Heath Drive. � 2tZJ John W. Davis cc: Southold Town Planning Board Highway Committee L. M. Tuthill, P.E. To: Raymond L. Jacobs , Superintendent Report No. 522 Southold Town Highway Department From: John W. Davis Date: June 30, 1986 Re: Hillcrest Estates - Sections I and 1I Comments: For the past three months intermittant grading and drainage installations have been continued on the above two sections . All drainage structures and pipe lines for both sections have been placed as shown on the plans with exception of the installations on the connection of Soundview Drive to Brown's Hill Road. This road section was deleted as agreed to by the Superintendent in 1985. Rough grading is 70±% complete in both sections except for the extension of Heath Drive from Soundview Drive to the end (approximately Sta 14 to Sta 22) where no clearing and grading has been done. Recharge basin excavation and forming berms and slopes about 657 complete. A considerable amount of road sloping behind curbs throughout remains to be done . The stockpile of clay on Hill Creek Drive (interference to curb construction) has been moved enough to place curbs . 1 have had time to make brief inspections of work on this projec' . Drainage and grading operations have been acceptable to date . Note: There is no bond estimate for Section 11 . The upper section of Heath Drive in Section 11 shows a right angle turn on a 107 grade which was probably overlooked when the plans were reviewed. Provided the 107 grade cannot be reduced the curb grades should be banked properly to overcome a bad situation. Young and Young began curb stakeouts today starting at the State Highway and Heath Drive. '. i John W. Davis cc: Southold Town Planning Board Highway Committee L. M. Tuthill, P.E. May 27, 1986 Description of parcel of land as shown on a map entitled "Subdivision Map of Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 at Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York". Beginning at a point on the westerly line of Heath Drive; which point is •N. 100 21 ' 10" W. 76.03 feet as measured along the westerly line of Heath Drive from the northeasterly terminus of an arc of a curve connecting the northerly line of Hill Crest Drive with the westerly line of Heath Drive, and running thence from said point of beginning, generally westerly, northerl; and easterly along the boundary lines of a certain realty subdivision as shown on a map entitled "Hill Crest Estates, Section 111, filed in the office of the Clerk of Suffolk County under file number 7218 the following courses and distances: (1) N. 100 21 ' 10" W. 85.00 feet, (2) S. 780 34' 40" W. 218.47 feet, (3) N. 110 255 20" W. 89.00 feet, (4) S. 780 34' 40" W. 300.00 feet, (5) S. - 110 25' 20" E. 40.00 feet, (6) S. 780 34' 40" W. 64.36 feet, (7) N. 360 59' 10" W. 198.46 feet, (8) N. 140 02' 30" W. 136.11 feet, (9) S. 780 34' 40" W. 44.70 feet, (10) N. 340 31 ' 29" W. 326.82 feet, (11 ) N. 740 28' 10" E. 149.02 feet to the land now or formerly of Jane Selvar; thence southerly, easterly and northerly along the land now or formerly of Jane Selvar the following courses and distances: (1) S. 230 02' 50" E. 93.00 feet, (2) 'd. 720 57' 20" E. 340.00 feet, (3) 14. 230 28' 50" W. 54.00 feet, (4) N. 15° 36' 00" W. 332.48 feet, (5) N. 170 37' 30" W. 362.00 feet to Long Island Sound; i i thence easterly along Long Island Sound to the land now or formerly of Otto and Rosalie Zapf, a "tie line" along Long Island Sound having the following courses and distances: (1) S. 850 58' 30" E. 224.03 feet, (2) N. 730 38' 00" E. 308.87 feet; thence southerly and easterly along the land now or formerly of Otto and Rosalie Zapf the following courses and distances: (1) S. 150 46' 30" E. 665.00 feet, (2) N. 720 -57' 20" E. 175.00 feet to the land now or formerly of Harrison M. Demarest, Jr. , Robert Demarest and another; thence southerly along the land now or formerly of Harrison M. Demarest,' Jr. , -Robert Demarest and another, the following courses and distances: (1) S. 80 04' 52" E. 50.09 feet, (2) S. 100 21 ' 10" E. 723.83 feet to a point in a boundary line of aforesaid realty subdivision entitled "Hill Crest Estates, Section 111; thence S. 790 38' 50" W. along a boundary line of aforesaid realty subdivision entitled "Hill Crest -Estates, Section 11. 317.00 feet to. the point or place of beginning. YOUNG %; YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK rigor 516727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG Poofnsionot Engi umv 96 UmA Summ7cr Land s Play 28, 1986 Mr. Larold Neese 855 Sunrise llighway Lynbrook, Now Fork 11563 Deas Mr. Reese: it the direction of Gerry McLean we have prepared a " )Pscription of pastel of land as shown on a map entitled "Subdivision Map of bill Crest Estates, ,Section 2 at Orient, `Poen of Southold, Suf- folk County, New York" and are transmitting same to you. Very trulJJy7 yours, 'L0"1.- rrL Aden ';!,. ng g enc. May 27, 1986 Description of parcel of land as shown on a map entitled "Subdivision Map of Hill Crest Estates, Section 2 at Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York". Beginning at a point on the westerly line of Heath Drive; which point is N. 10° 21 ' 10" W. 76.03 feet as measured along the westerly line of Heath Drive from the northeasterly terminus of an arc of a curve connecting the northerly line of Hill Crest Drive with the westerly line of Heath Drive, and running thence from said point of beginning, generally westerly, northerly and easterly along the boundary lines of a certain realty subdivision as shown on a map entitled "Hill Crest Estates, Section I ", filed in the office of the Clerk of Suffolk County under file number 7218 the following courses and distances: (1 ) N. 100 21 ' 10" W. 85.00 feet, (2) S. 780 34' 40" W. 218.47 feet, (3) N. 110 25' 20" W. 89.00 feet, (4) S. 78° 34' 40" W. 300.00 feet, (5) S. 110 25' 20" E. 40.00 feet, (6) S. 780 34' 40" W. 64.36 feet, (7) N. 36° 59' 10" W. 198.46 feet, (8) N. 14° 02' 30" W. 136. 11 feet, (9) S. 780 34' 40" W. 44.70 feet, (10) N. 340 31 ' 29" W. 326.82 feet, ( I1 ) N. 74° 28' 10" E. 149.02 feet to the land now or formerly of Jane Selvar; thence southerly, easterly and northerly along the land now or formerly of Jane Selvar the following courses and distances : (1 ) S. 230 02' 50" E. 93.00 feet, (2) N. 72° 57' 20" E. 340.00 feet, (3) N. 23° 28' 50" W. 54.00 feet, (4) N. 150 36' 00" W. 332.48 feet, (5) N. 17° 37' 30" W. 362.00 feet to Long Island Sound; thence easterly along Long Island Sound to the land now or formerly of Otto and Rosalie Zapf, a "tie line" along Long Island Sound having the followinc courses and distances: (1) S. 850 58' 30" E. 224.03 feet, (2) N. 73° 38' 00" E. 308.87 feet; thence southerly and easterly along the land now or formerly of Otto and Rosalie Zapf the following courses and distances: (1 ) S. 15° 46' 30" E. 665.00 feet, (2) N. 72° 57' 20" E. 175.00 feet to the land now or forrr of Harrison M. Demarest, Jr. , Robert Demarest and anot thence southerly along the land now or formerly of Harrison M. Demar= Jr. , Robert Demarest and another, the following courses and distances: (1 ) S. 8° 04' 52" E. 50.09 feet, (2) S. 10° 21 ' 10" E. 723.83 feet to a point in a boundar. line of aforesaid realty subdivision entitled "Hill Crest Estates, Section 1" ; thence S. 790 38' 50" W. along a boundary line of aforesaid realty subdivision entitled "Hill Crest Estates, Section 1" 317.00 feet to the point place of beginning. r� cc,�, FFo�,, • PLIr , TO . �$ D xr �` B „ 4 NO Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 May 13, 1986 Mr. Harold Reese Cfo.G. McLean P.O. Box 387 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Hill Crest Estates Section II Dear Mr. Reese: As per the corresondence from the Town Attorney, upon receipt of a complete submission for final approval, the above mentioned subdivision may be set for a final hearing. Would you please submit the following information to complete the file so we may schedule a public hearing: 1. Six surveys of the final road and drai(�jrge plan, dated March 24, 1983 as amended. 2 . Six additional surveys of the final map dated as amended October 11, 1985. Qk- 3 . Metes and bounds description for Section II C�4-- 4. Three surveys endorsed by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services in accordance with Article 6. Upon receipt of the above, we can make the necessary referrals and then schedule a public hearing on the next available agenda. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, n„,-zt or("kk ,(>-oL,� BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRD SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARS By Diane M. Schultze, Secretar; �PPSP pros. enc. BSS SUNRISE HIGHWAY LYNBROOK. N. Y. 11563 616-593.520 A P R April 15,1986 We would like to make the following suggestions : Harbor Lights Estates Section 5 1 . Because of the high cost of bonding and the need to keep men working on an even basis all year round, we would like to develop section 5 with 5 sections over a 3-5 year period . 2 . Elimination of Windjammer Dr. So. to No . Bayview Road. 3 . Extend Clipper Drive thru to Windward and thru to No. Bayview Rd as indicated by the red lines . 4. Possible elimination of Clipper Drive going straight thru to No . Bayview because we already have two entrances-- or, one being Anchor Lane and the other- - Brigantine Drive . Seawood Acres No suggested changes with the exception of making it ' nto 2 sections spread over a 2-3 year period. illcreat Estates We already have preliminary approval and we have no Suggested changes . . Harold A . Reese GCM TT-IE>" 14 -\ -1 -&P MAR 12 1986 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . . . IL L Cut 6s E SSI✓1 l6S SEC . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . . . ....... . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber . . . .t 0m. . . .. .. . . .. . Page . . . �. . . . . . . . . .. . On . . .�f•t✓ ./. . . . . . Liber . . . .. .. . . . . .. .... ....... Page . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . On . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . ; Liber . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . On . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ; Liber . .. . . .. .. . . . . . .. . .... .. . Page . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . ... On . . . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . ; Liber . .... .. .. .. .. .... ...... . Page On . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . . . . . .... . . . . .... . . .... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . oras distributee . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .... .... . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .... . . ... . . . . . . : . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .... . . . ... .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . S. The area of the land is . . . . aa' �. . . . . . . acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except . . . .—.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 7. The land is encumbered by .10~I� . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortga_5e recorded in Liber . . / 7 . . . Page . . /. . . . . . .. . in original amount D of $. / . . .). unpaid amount $ . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . held by . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . address . .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . in original amount of . . . . . . . . . . . .. . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . held by . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . address . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . in original amount of . .. .. .. . . . . .. . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . held by . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . .. address . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except . . .NQ tot„• ,• • • , • • • •, . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. . .... . 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts . .�. . .!' !A)" . . .�.GO.tO4 t'-T. RP Q-I. ... . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . .... . ...... . . . . . 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept . . . .. .. ..o.fit . . .. . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . ... . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land ((does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 13. Water mains will be laid by . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . .. . . �. ' ' .Co • • •• • • • • • . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . and (--I (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "P" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures oil the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots shoving all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". e 22. Thea applicant estimates that the cost of radia and required PP grading q public improvements will be $• . . . . . . .. , as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at . .. .. .. .. . . . . . years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F".nn DATE . ... . .x^.49-t.u. 19 6/U-.. .. . . . . ., � I,RD�D P�r6$F . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . .... . .. .. ... . . . . . (Name of Applicant) M (A6 &N—i By . .. .. . . .. .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . .... . (Signature and Title) �4 y SurIRis - Nw.'� 1'.. . . .� y".lg700k (Address) f-1• //,r63 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF l� ss: On the p. . . /.rJ . .. . . . . . da of. , , , , , , . •, 19. ,/., before me personally came • . •• • ..�S . . . to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . . . executed the same. MARMERY D. BURNS No9Yry Public, Stale of New York Ouohflml in Suffolk Could? . . . . . ' . . . ' . No. 52-05o93ou Notary Public bion E*Mt March 30, STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . ss: On the . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . day . . . .. . . .. . . . of . . . . . . . . . .. . . ., 19. .. . . ., before me personally came . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that . . . . . . . . . .. . resides at No. . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . that . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . is the . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that . .. . . . . . . . . . knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. and that . . . . . . . . . . . . signed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . name thereto by like order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '.Votary Public Southold Town PlannilV� Board Town Hall ' Southold, New York 11971 Re: Gentlemen: \� The following statements are ffered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentione minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planni Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation ex vation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes w 1 be made in the grades of the existing roads . (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of exis 'ng structures are proposed. Yours truly, 1a164(9184) . • PROJECT I.D.NUMBER r NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORNMAR 19 1 r For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I Project Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. Applicant/sponsor2. Project Name 1414Rpg_D REESS FIIL) cl�ESi EL i• $ sC J J. Project location: q '- Municipality 6 R t E fl j County 1.1r[.1 4. Is proposed action: ❑ New LDS Expansion ❑ Modification/alteration S. Describe project briefly: Y —( F4E S'L&010rltCrork 0 I7vTp /1 3Lat�1,A,� �0lS 6. Precise location(road intersections,prominent landmarks,etc.or p vide map) pr A� 0 g0%'0µ MILLS 1�(7 �oR=rr H of d 7. Amount of land affected`: p Q Initially acres Ultimately as - / acres 8. Will proposed action Ccomply with existing zoning or other existing land use restrictions? Yes ❑ No If No,describe briefly 9. What is present land use in vicinity of project _ Residential ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Agriculture ❑ Parkland/open space ❑ Other escribe: 10. Does action involve ra�permit/approval, or funding, now or ultimately, from any other governmental agency(Federal,state or local)? El Yes V No If yes, list agency(s)and permit/approvals 11. Dooels any aspect of the action have a currently valid permit or approval? ff r� tpoeYes ❑ No If yes,list agency name and permitlapproval type S FF �O 1�"I 0 F- E %6'2 'd-Y 7owH 12. As result of proposed action will existing permit/approval require modification? po ❑ Yes �No _ I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE , Applicant/,ponsor nam /- e: Dale: r""C 0 'U-qJ-1 Signature: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER PART II Environmental Assessment (To be completed by Agencyi A. Does action exceed any Type I threshold in 6 NYCRR, Par[617.127 If yes, coordmate the review process and use the FULL/LONG FORM EAF. ❑ Yes ❑ No B. Will action receive coordinated review as provided for Unlisted Actions in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.77 If No, a negative declaration may be superreded by anot involved action. ❑ Yes ❑ No C. Could action result in ANY adverse effects on, to, or arising from the following:(Answers may be handwritten, if legible) Cl. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic patterns,solid waste production or disposal,potential for eros,, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Historic,archeological,visual or aesthetic,or other natural or cultural resources;agricultural districts;or community or neighborhood charactart Explain or C3. Vegetation or fauna, movement of fish or wildlife species,significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural rescurcest Fxpl.vn hrietly. C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Secondary, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C7{67 Explain briefly. C7. A change in use of either quantity or type of energyr Explain briefly. PART III Determination of Significance (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a) setting(i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring (c)duration; (d) irreversibility;(e)geographic scope; and(f)magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supportinf materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identifier, and adequately addressed. ❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Ther proceed directly to the FULL/LONG FORM EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide here, and ui attachments as necessary, the reasons supportng this determination: Agency Name Agency Preparers Name Preoarrrs signatureR rtle Mite � ,lig •R .� �; i�� OFFIC M,TQ s? ORNEY ROBERT W.TASKER 1N 'QB D TELEPHONE Town Attorney � (516) 477-1400 425 MAIN STREET P.O.BOX 697 GREENPORT,U.,NEW YORK 11944 February 5, 1986 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Town Nall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Hillcrest Estates, Section II at Orient Dear Mr. Orlowski: By letter dated January 30, 1986, you submitted to me copies of all relevant documents in the Planning Board's file relative to actions taken by the Planning Board with respect to Sections 1 and 11 of the above subdivision. You have requested that 1 advise the Planning Board as to the procedure it should follow in considering final plat approval of Section 11 of the subdivision. In reviewing the documents sent to me, it appears that by Application dated June 22, 1981, the applicant applied for preliminary plat approval t for 70 acres of land, being all of applicant's land. A hearing for preliminary plat approval was thereafter held and preliminary plat approval was granted by resolution adopted on June 15, 1982. On February 7, 1983, the Planning Board held a hearing on the final approval of Section I of said subdivision (comprising the westerly 44.751 acres of the subdivision) , and by resolution adopted on March 7, 1983, final plat approval was granted for Section 1 of the subdivision. You have advised me that the land owner now wishes "to proceed with filing for final approval for Section 11". As previously noted, preliminary plat approval of both Sections I and 11 was granted by the Planning Board by resolution adopted on June 15, 1982. Section 100-31 B(2) of the Zoning Code provides that the bulk requirements of Column A-40 of the Bulk Schedule (40,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) shall apply to "(2) all lots on major subdivision maps 10 -2- upon which the Planning Board has held a hearing for preliminary map approval prior to May 20, 1983". Since a hearing for preliminary map approval was held with respect to both Sections I and II prior to May 20, 1983, both Sections I and II may be developed with lots having a minimum area of 40,000 sq. ft. , in accordance with Column A-40 of the Bulk Schedule. You are undoubtedly aware of Sections 106-23 E(4) [Preliminary plat for major subdivision`], and 106-24 A( 1) [Final plat for major subdivisions] of the Subdivision Regulations. Section 106-23 E(4) provides, in essence, that within six (6) months after granting preliminary approval, "the owner must submit the plat for final approval. If such plat is not so submitted, approval of the preliminary plat may be revoked by the Planning Board." On the other hand, Section 106-24 A( 1) provides, in part, that: "The subdivider shall within six (6) months after approval of the preliminary plat, file with the Town Clerk an application in duplicate for final plat approval of all or a art of the ro ogcl subdivision. . .Thus, the subdivider may eve op the su I sion in progressive stages Instead o in its entirety." One might conclude that the two above quoted sections of the Subdivision Regulations are in conflict. However, when read together it is clear that Section 106-23 E(4) applies when the subdivision is not to be developed in sections, and Section 106-24 A( 1) applies when the subdivision is to be developed in sections, in which latter case, an application for final approval of a section only must be filed within six months of preliminary approval of the plat. It is, therefore, my opinion that the developer has complied with the Subdivision Regulations since he has applied for final approval of Section I within six months of the preliminary approval of the plat, and therefore, all that is needed is an application for final approval of Section II and the final approval of Section II by the Planning Board after a public hearing thereon. Respectfully submitted, �l ROBERT W. TASKER RWT:aa �FFO[k OFFIC ORNEY -)BERT W.TASKER D TELEPHC To" Attorney � _1�® (516) 477- 425 MAIN STREET • P.O.BOX 697 GREENPORT,L.I.,NEW YORK 11944 February 5, 1986 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Hillcrest Estates, Section II at Orient Dear Mr. Orlowski : By letter dated January 30, 1986, you submitted to me copies of all relevant documents in the Planning Board's file relative to actions taken by the Planning Board with respect to Sections I and II of the above subdivision. You have requested that I advise the Planning Board as to the procedure it should follow in considering final plat approval of Section II of the subdivision. In reviewing the documents sent to me, it appears that by Application dated June 22, 1981, the applicant applied for preliminary plat approval for 70 acres of land, being all of applicant's land. A hearing for preliminary plat approval was thereafter held and preliminary plat approval was granted by resolution adopted on June 15, 1982. On February 7, 1983, the Planning Board held a hearing on the final approval of Section I of said subdivision (comprising the westerly 44. 751 acres of the subdivision) , and by resolution adopted on March 7, 1983, final plat approval was granted for Section 1 of the subdivision. You have advised me that the land owner now wishes "to proceed with filing for final approval for Section II". As previously noted, preliminary plat approval of both Sections I and II was granted by the Planning Board by resolution adopted on June 15, 1982. Section 100-31 B(2) of the Zoning Code provides that the bulk requirements of Column A-40 of the Bulk Schedule (40,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) shall apply to 11(2) all lots on major subdivision maps 't3(v 1 101 -2- upon which the Planning Board has held a hearing for preliminary map approval prior to May 20, 1983". Since a hearing for preliminary map approval was held with respect to both Sections I and II prior to May 20, 1983, both Sections I and II may be developed with lots having a minimum area of 40,000 sq. ft. , in accordance with Column A-40 of the Bulk Schedule. You are undoubtedly aware of Sections 106-23 E(4) [Preliminary plat for major subdivisiong , and 106-24 A( 1) [Final plat for major subdivisions] of the Subdivision Regulations. Section 106-23 E(4) provides, in essence, that within six (6) months after granting preliminary approval, "the owner must submit the plat for final approval. If such plat is not so submitted, approval of the preliminary plat may be revoked by the Planning Board. " On the other hand, Section 106-24 A( 1) provides, in part, that: "The subdivider shall within six (6) months after approval of the preliminary plat, file with the Town Clerk an application in duplicate for final plat approval of all or a art of the ro osed subdivision. . .Thus, the subdivider may evelop the sub ivision in progressive stages instead of in its entirety." One might conclude that the two above quoted sections of the Subdivision Regulations are in conflict. However, when read together it is clear that Section 106-23 E(4) applies when the subdivision is not to be developed in sections, and Section 106-24 A(1) applies when the subdivision is to be developed in sections, in which latter case, an application for final approval of a section only must be filed within six months of preliminary approval of the plat. It is, therefore, my opinion that the developer has complied with the Subdivision Regulations since he has applied for final approval of Section I within six months of the preliminary approval of the plat, and therefore, all that is needed is an application for final approval of Section II and the final approval of Section II by the Planning Board after a public hearing thereon. Respectfully submitted, ROBERT W. TASKER RWT :aa PI ,-N NI G^�►y-BOARyyD T O;W_N O SOU -HOLD S LF Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 January 30 , 1986 Mr. Robert W. Tasker Town Attorney 425 Main Street Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Hillcrest Estates Section II located at Orient Dear Mr. Tasker: Enclosed, please find the following: 1. Copy of application for plat approval for Hillcrest Estates, containing 66 acres. 2 . Copy of a legal notice advertising preliminary hearing for Hillcrest, Sections I and II, metes and bounds describes entire parcel. 3. Copy of minutes from the preliminary hearing held on April 12 , 1982. 4 . Copy of Planning Board resolution granting preliminary approval to Hillcrest Estates , June 15 , 1982. 5. Copy of legal notice advertising final hearing on Hillcrest Estates, Section I, containing 44 acres . 6. Copies of minutes from final hearing for Section I of Hillcrest Estates, February 7 , 1983 . 7. Copy of Planning Board resolution granting final approval to Section I of Hillcrest Estates , March 7 , 1983 . 8 . Copy of subdivision map for entire premises . 9 . Copy of subdivision map for Section I only. To date there has been no filing for final approval for Hillcrest Estates, Section II . Mr. Tasker Page 2 January 30 , 1986 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Reese has indicated that he would like to proceed with filing for final approval for Section II . Would you please advise the Planning Board as to the procedure for finalizing this subdivision. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, or require any additional information please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR, CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. DEC 3 1J8� P.O. Boz 10,Victoria Falls,Zimbabwe.Telephone: 203, 204, 205. Telex: 3324. Telegrams: "Fallsotel" L.... 0 . kL G US a zirrnbabwe sun hotel WII � IEEIpp,)pAi V19Wf10ry�gflL `` 1511CW 16N 4�n1t W RCIR 9I%IE E K ' '9VI:K ft InH EURbY (R�JMc 'IS pPO%IMP E (1 �Nl'V au I•,'n!1: MMG^TL f1.1 P �1 k%.ano.I rt.r rl Lm!I{IptE?5 SOUND rT,m'N rwL.MN LCF., ChW'R,V'pE A1Ctiyp IDT Nw.p1�"`BENp V .TNIyAy MKRN{nG;v maM:!�Ngp� /� / 3°.� C LONG 151-AND _ 162.6 8 9 TOP OF BLUFF R=26.47' L=39.53 'MN'✓nA yAmsq.WH aK.�yA aRT / _4__�� � APPROXIMATE Y0UNG6Y0UNG N. 0°2110"W. 76.03' IO AG°A'MA?L K15'Nlcur.y WiRL � � 4 T DRIVE N' AN LOCA -3 81993. 4 � / EBRUARY pgES `Lb VIEY' p � Dq+VE ,M pgIVE tINISHED SHALE \ 1 A/ �8 8 ' LIMIT OFCOASTA ON NYS TOR 10 }' m AREA A9 SHOWN sDT E e2..A� \ _ __ EROSION HAZARD AREA s1UHAGL --59 y S y / MAPS DATEDRD De .1 8/29/138. fII 1� DEIVE Y GnUNC n-r EN _ • ! It; 9 / ! T5 + ENdELOq P.1 bm NO,aa E. V AD xx 1 9 � • � 0 MMN 110 SGPM • f E � � 5U°MEHSISIE PUMP TYPICAL WELL DETAIL B��i Is £ 1 so r I � o PROPERTY LINE F1°N WELL 9 10 E�\? LOCATION MAP WELL /—� Sod NousE /o 0 SF 6'MI e jp SEPTIC TANK - s TIC TAN% :\\ _._ �/ N1 2p` �0 OOQO II 1 1 4�S.F./wy w le 6 3 5 LEACHING PULLLLACn ING PoOL 2 80.00 br�,2p/Fr //q Ig.671 N5 / j1 1 1 0 GO 4 c_ ROAD �� �'/ / / r /43 / Yn_�, �21i�` �. 1��+•p7 1 1111 TYPICAL PLOT PLAN_ . ^' - y..� - N N x,491 0 114 YB_u 78"�"'"` SEs 1 X11 -IA ./ �'1B1 19.WW , 2'�•:��.:-'Loos 1 11 1 p n. FINISHED GRACE TEST HOLE N0.3 _ \� ~c�" 4 5 S' •�� n�'0 ' R%25'Sj�' S 111 I'YIn I MIN TOP p ad pIV �Qj{. i 2'MA% 9DIL QI• pd, 1 1 . _ _ /a" I• In",r SAj- ? f3 /� V1E`N ��ppAp L�3 74 uL .. 40 2 S.F.,L LOAM II 1111 :T Cur 10 _ EMIN 10096 FT I / 43, 9x 3 N? 0 1 1 1 7 Ia -- SIDE WDLL AXED SAND, 77� - 267p I I 1 O LEACHING TOOL CLAY, 11 1 1 900 GAL BG RAVEL q N I[)� LE 4 1 9FPTILTAMK 1 q O \ „ 1 j 39 .4R1 VEST 3 -{— FIME 11.D' 12• 9 7 A iT\ _ Al. 1 _ 2�_S YNO, ,\ ,� O ENT ST N• 7 G o 50 �. 11 1 1 GROYNG nAi EP L41GM '1 6 4 /% N ',,BEY ,AAI I 221. p 11 1 l cur Ia.D' .�_ Q 412` mlI TYPICALSEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 90Ja _ ' �E 4pp06 S'F. $, 461 37 m N7�, 15dE 1 1 1 . — —_ _. _ 6 p 2 7.00 11 ( 1 N 40p71 s'F s 33 It 1111 6 SUBDIVISION MAP OF THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT 1� 1� 0 1••4D, p, •QQ50 S'F' �1�11 HILL CREST ESTATES SECTION 2 COMPLY WITH THE STAN DAO O S AND REDU I R EME N TS OF TH E SO F FOLK COUN TY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,\ / 150 Y p 1111 ' (r STD w• °oN 218471 B (9.391 AT ORIENT 6J3g4 C) 267.00 HOWARD W. YO G,N.Y. Lg79'3B5dw S LIC N045893 �S �q•'SG , +� � � N 11 I11 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ,yggow 9 a. p IIII1 SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK 0 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MAGE BY US FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETEDII l 1 SIG}" 419R 5AND THATALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS • HEREONACTUALLY l fTl IIII I EXISTAND THEIR POSITIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC E1{ 1 (,' I 11 1 1 DETAILS ARE CORRECT. / SO 0 _ 2 99 Estut9 F• N .Wj 1 32 HOWARD W.YOUN N.Y.S. L w. LIC. NO. 45893 H111 C ('i00niv 1p/(Q J }1 III 1 1 l5 o Yl THIS ISCERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING - M18, 'g• 8 \\ MAR 2 8 1994 BOARD OFF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BY RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL DATED —� SOUTHOLD TOWN BY DATE _ PLANNING BOARD CHAIRMAN, PLANNING BOARD OWNER; NOTE HAROLD REESE, JR., RONALD REESE, a CHRISTINE REESE I. AREAS SHOWN THUS: RES. ARE RESERVED ^c N� THIS SUBDIVISION WILL APPEAR IN DISTRICT 1000 ON SECTION 13 855 SUNRISE HIGHWAY FOR POSSIBLE FUTURE HIGHWAY DEDICATION FEB 21 993 Q W BLOCK 2 OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP THE LOT LINES OF SUBDIVISION MAPS AS FILED, CANNOT BE ALTERED WITHOUT PERMISSION 2 . =MONUMENT Y LYNBROOK, N.Y. 11563 DEC 9, 1992 �p FROM THE PLANNING BOARD, AND LOTS MUST BE SOLD AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION MAP. 3. TOPOGRAPHICAL DATA SHOWN HEREON AUG.11,1989 AUG. 11, 1989 to 4. —20— INDICATES EXISTING CONTOUR SEPT B, 1986 * p 5. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.VD 1929. OCT. 22, 1985 .T TOTAL AREA- 22.90 ACRES OCT 11, 1966 DATE! JUNE 19, 1985 50 C 50 100 SCALES I° = 100 40 , RIM ERHEAD, NY. ALD .Y.S.P.L.8 L.S LIC. NO.12845 HOWARD W. YOUNG,N. IS. .S.LIC. NO.45893 I