Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-141.-3-35 JI I PLANTING SCHEDULE KEN COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE OTY. i P.A. LONDON PLANET REE PLAT AN US ACERFOL IA /2-2CAL. 2 PI -P COLORADO SPRUCE PICEA PUNGENS 3- 4 FL I \ BE-L CUT LEAF BIRCH BETULA LACIN IATA 2 -21/2CAL \ JU-H BLUE JUNIPER JUNIPERUS HETZI GLAUCA 2-21/2'FT 5 ' JU-C COMPACT PFITZER JUNIPE JUNIPERUS COMPACTA 15-18" 3GAL 5 J JU-P GOLD TIP PFITZER JUNIPERUS PPITZERIANA 2 -21/2 FT 5 <o JUNIPER e e' 4' ao WEsi°NALIA AVE 'fie JO-P wE rptiq�iq ! ?. 3 ?Oa4¢ 00 F e°Q x e� 9 ro D .> Jp h l \ P4 P _` H°E JU ro° °Q LEA �S6 TS °ee e y p 0 4 e s co 0 EE EA /Q S S \ �\ � 9 p \ ex sT cG P�'P 9f- 1 LOCATION MAP c \ /"-o o m / c N 1 I "_ 2O0 l ' Oa44 00 W clo 16 p 2 �p C / \ �4 /S \ J♦y�♦ \\ /o T25 / G �2 00 -10 N' 40 \ 00, \ 6 Pop♦pF OSP♦♦ ti� \ �J\O ti / ea 2 R8o 0 �. \ �♦\fit 229,)• Qy QQ I ay `♦ o� Oh ♦♦p`\ FqY°� RPh e`\� No A OSP OJY / F+ c�c`gb•• s isT,roP < FSo a?` 00 'TO 00! O00 rid d0 G Yj 3 <y 20 6, 0J" \ L F \ i R a; I ?O 00 h- ^ / 0, F 01 P l O 00. SITE SITE PLAN PREPARED FOR p°o" �� �P� BRIDEN MACHINE CORP. y \� AT MATTITUCK /\ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD oF 0\ QyQo� SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK [JAN 3d �E �J /+61 �o h <o \ pppROVED BY SITE DATA pLANNING BOARD O SDISTC O.000 SECT, 14TAX MAP 1 BK 03 LOT 35 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD s`>`PpD`W Ew `p4 / 2. LOT AREA = 34450 SF. t 3 EXISTING BUILDING AREA = 1114 SF DATE �9� 2 I 4. PROPOSED BUILDING AREA - 11900 S.F. ' 5 TOTAL BUILDING AREA = 13014 S.F 41 6. NO OF PARKING STALLS = I6 iom o noowon a nus�,i�w viownuw of qC 45693 lANO 90XVfV00. �ilnn true JAN 241986 / "" I DATE JAN.2, 1986 YOUNG 8 YOUNG .n°ne SCALE+ I"= 20' 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE .nuu RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK L , , ,,, - NO.: 85-1564 ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. PE.B L.S. NO. 12845 HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. NO. 45893 _- 50031 f � � N D Tq LD S LFFP� Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 11, 1986 Mr. Alfred Bouffard Maple Lane P.O. Box 802 Mattituck, N Y 11952 Re: Site Plan for Briden Machine Shop Dear Mr. Bouffard: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, February 10, 1986 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site plan for "Briden Machine Shop" for construction of a 70 ' X 170 ' Industrial Building located at Mattituck, survey dated as :Last amended January 24, 1986; subject to: 1. A one-year review and field inspection prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. It was noted that this plan received certification from the Building Department, special exception and variances from the Board of Appeals and a waiver from the moratorium from the Town Board. When the Chairman has endorsed the surveys , we will forward one to you. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc : ZBA 0 Building Department 0 MEMORANDUM TO: FILE FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town planner RE: 6yI ?cQQ�wa c� DATE: MEMORANDUM TO: FILE FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: �LLLCtiR� j9xA1- , V7` �14�/ QEocla-C;' drat-7� 3r DATE: n .✓�J� �9�7 -046 4 g�7 SJo.1y PLANNING BOARD MEB h�O�OSOFFO(� COG BENNETTORLOWSKIJR. y Chairman C < Town Hall, 53095 WILLI Main Road AM Jti. CREMERS P.O. Box 1179 GEORGE RITC I EDWARD S _. ,y • . :: Southold, New York 11971 E RITCHIE LATHAIVI,JR. - .�� �� . Fax (516 RICHARD G.WARD 1 `\ ) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 6, 1997 Matthew E. Pachman, Esq. Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Hwy. Commack, NY 11725 Dear Mr. Pachman: With regard to your FOIL request of October 31, 1997, please be advised I this office does not maintain files on certificates of occupancy or completion. I reviewed our records however, and found site plana dvllow that Parcel SCTM# 1000-141-3-35 site of Briden Machine Corp. I enclosed herein. Please remit a check for $2.25 approval for the following Southold, to cover cost of copies. p A copy of same is , made out to the Town of ' Sir}cerely. Valerie Scopaz Town Planner enc. Su6mrhfeal �1eGrZ.ZS cc: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk NOV ! 7 iii.. ----------- --- • ,r Off'641� ' S PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS n' y. �G BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Chairman ,pZ` Town Hall, 53095 Main Road y P.O. Box 1179 > T Southold, New York 11971 WILLIAM J. CREMERS � Fax (516) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS v, "Ol -�Y Telephone (516) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. RICHARD G.WARD '-�- PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 6, 1997 Matthew E. Pachman, Esq. Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Hwy. Commack, NY 11725 Dear Mr. Pachman: With regard to your FOIL request of October 31, 1997, please be advised that this office does not maintain files on certificates of occupancy or completion. I reviewed our records however, and found site plan approval for the following parcel SCTM# 1000-141-3-35, site of Briden Machine Corp. A copy of same is enclosed herein. Please remit a check for $2.25, made out to the Town of Southold, to cover cost of copies. Sir}cerely' Valerie Scopaz Town Planner enc. cc: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk PAGHMAN, PAGHMAN & BROWN, P.G. ATTORNEYS 366 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY COMMACK, NEWYORK 11725 (516) 543-2200 TELEGOPIER (516) 543-2271 HOWARD E. PAGHMAN MATTHEW E. RACHMAN KAREN R. BROWN' COUNSEL uso..nmirreu m vew aennw HARVEY B. BESUNDER PATRICK A. SWEENEY MEL R. MASSA October 31, 1997 Planning Department Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE : FOIL Request Dear Sir/Madam: In accordance with the provisions of the New York Freedom of Information Law, New York Public Officers Law Article 6, the undersigned hereby requests copies of all agency records as set forth in Schedule A attached hereto. We agree to pay any appropriate statutory fees . If any documents responsive to this request are withheld on the grounds that they are exempt from public disclosure, please provide a list of the withheld documents stating the basis for the claims of exemption. Also, please identify the name and the address of the person or body to whom an appeal of the decision to withhold said records can be made . Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MATTFIEW E. PACHMAN MEP/blb attachment ...bam\mattituck\fail.lt4 - NOY 5 SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC RECORDS REQUESTED Copies of any certificates of occupancy, certificates of completion, or other permits or approvals with respect to the following parcels : Suffolk County Tax Map (SCTM) #1000-141-3-33 , #1000-141-3-35, and #1000-141-3-36 . PL`A'NING- O'ARD t V I TOAM OF SO QLD Y M tt�� SL F . LX- TY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 14 , 1986 Mr. Alfred Bouffard Maple Lane P.O. Box 802 Mattituck NY 11952 Re: Site Plan for Briden Machine Dear Mr. Bouffard: Enclosed is a signed survey for the above mentioned proposal which has been approved by the Planning Board. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours , &A',L Gr(Zw4tC .)(,,ot� BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. 0 10 TEL. 765-1802 5VFF0(��0//66 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR P.O. BOX 728 v' TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 January 27, 1986 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Subject: Briden Machine--Mattituck, N.Y. Dated 1/2/86 Gentlemen: With the Board of Appeals approvals under appeals #3328 and #3329 dated May 23 , 1985 this site plan qualifies for certification in meeting zoning reg- ulations. Yours truly, Edward Hindermann EH:dsm Building Inspector I I T 0 Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa, p P.O. Box 728 � 1 « � Southold, New York 11971 JUDITH T.TERRY TELEPHONE TOWN CLERIC - REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK (516)765-1801 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 19, 1985: WHEREAS, A. E. Bouffard, Briden Machine Corp. , has requested that this Board waive thg provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 with respect to his application presently pending before the Southold Town Building Inspector, and WHEREAS, this Board finds that the applicant proposes to construct a new build- ing on his property on Westphalia Road, Mattituck, and WHEREAS, this Board deems such sue consistent with the uses in a Light Industrial District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine & Weiner, Inc. 's Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant be and he hereby is granted a waiverof the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 to the extent of permitting such uses on said premises as set forth in his application presently pending before the Southold Town Building Inspector for a building permit, subject, how- ever, to the applicant obtaining any and all permits and approvals required by all Town and other governmental agencies having jurisdiction thereof. Cele/` Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk f 1OhJNG V YOUNG 400 C6'1 P %NDF.R AVENUE RWERHEAD, NEW YCRK 11 1 FIC-7P7-° 03 :M TiEN'W. YOUNG HO=D W.YOUNG ^: �, v�,.v�l 'L-_3u rsr 45 I—na WA c.,. >-yx J A N RE CT January 3, 1986 r MR. ALFRED E. BOUFFARD 881 Westphalia Avnnue Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Mr. Bouffard: Enclosed are six (6) prints of the site plan prepared for DRIDFN F.ACHINE CORP. (85--1564) at Mattituck, Town of Southold, N.Y. Please note that we have altered the parking layout because the site plan prepared by your architect showed the existing building to be out of scale. The accurate setbacks hereon allow you to have the 1/0 foot building you originally requested and still meet the Town's requirements. Very truly yours, HOWARD W. YOUNG HWY: bapj Encl . P UFF�(/r D T LD S Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 25 , 1985 Mr. Alfred Bouffard Maple Lane P.O. Box 802 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Site Plan for Briden Machine located at Mattituck Dear Mr. Bouffard: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, June 24 , 1985 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board forward the site plan of Briden Machine, for construction of industrial building for a machine shop, to the building department for certification subject to receipt of three surveys with the following information and revisions: 1. Minimum set-backs, as per Board of Appeals resolution, (23 ' from the Long Island Rail Road; 15 ' from property of Penny; 23 ' from property of Bouffard) 2 . Landscaping along Westphaila Avenue 3 . Roof drainage to drywells in parking area When we are in receipt of the surveys, we will forward them to the Building Department. If you have any questions , please don' t hesitate to contact our offfice . Very truly yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary i cc: Building Department Wl 055E01 A' �� G o Southold Town Board of Appeal �yi g MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 O�ry01 ��O TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD - MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI May 31 , 1 985 Mr . Alfred E. Boufford , President Briden Machine Corporation Westphalia Road , Box 881 Mattituck , NY 11952 Re : Appeal Nos . 3328 and 3329 Dear Sir or Madam: Attached herewith is a copy of the formal findings and deter- mination recently rendered and filed this date with the Office of the Town Clerk concerning your applications . In the event your application has been approved, please be sure to return to the Building Department for approval of any new construc- tion in writing, or for other documents as may be applicable. If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to call either our office (765-1809) or that of the building inspector (765-1802) . Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN Enclosure By Linda F. Kowalski Cop of Decisionsto Secretary /Building Department Planning Board Suffolk County Planning Commission o o ` Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3328 Application Dated January 29 , 1985 tO: Mr . Alfred E . Boufford , President Briden Machine Corporation Westphalia Road , Box 881 Mattituck , NY 11952 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on May 23 , 1985 , the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request .for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ X] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article VIII , Section 100-80 ( B ) [ 1 ] [ ] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [ ] Request for Application of BRIDEN MACHINE CORP . , Box 881 , Mattituck , NY for a Special Exception to the Zoning r inance , Article VIII , Section 100-80 for permission to establish and use industrial building as a machine shop in this "C-Light Industrial " Zoning District , parcel identified as County Tax Map District 1000 , Section 141 , Block 03 , Lot 35; 555 Westphalia Avenue , Mattituck , NY . WHEREAS , a public hearing was held and concluded in the Matter of the Application of BRIDEN MACHINE CORPORATION under Appeal No . 3328 on March 28 , 1985 , and WHEREAS , the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question as well as its surrounding area , and WHEREAS , the board has considered all testimony and documentation entered into the record in this matter , and WHEREAS , the board made the following findings of fact : 1 . The property in question is located in a "C-Light" Indus- trial Zoning District as adopted by resolution of the Town Board on November 15 , 1983 , and contains a total area of 34 , 450± sq . ft . with frontage of 156 . 75 feet along Westphalia Avenue ; 2 . The subject premises is identified as District 1000 , Section 141 , Block 3 , Lot 35 on the Suffolk County Tax Maps and is improved with one concrete block building set back 1 . 4± feet from its front property line along Westphalia Avenue and 28± feet at its nearest point from the easterly ( side ) property line . 3 . By this application , appellant requests relief from Article VIII , Sections 100-81 and 100-80 ( B) [1 ] for permission to construct an 80 ' by 180 ' building for industrial use with an insufficient setback : (a ) from the most south-easterly property ( CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO ) TED: May 30 , 1985 . CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS a ZB4 (rev. 12/81) ?age 2 - Appeal No . 3328 Matter of BRIDEN MACHINE CORP . ( Special Exception ) Decision Rendered May 2 , 1985 line at its nearest point eight feet ; ( b ) from the most south- westerly property line along land now of Penny , five feet ; (c ) from the property line along the southerly side of land now of Ruland , 10 feet . 4 . The subject premises is of unusual character being an " I_. " - shaped parcel , and simultaneously herewith an application for an area variance was conditionally granted under Appeal No . 3329 for insufficient setbacks . 5 . For the record it is noted that the Planning Board on April 1 , 1985 has reviewed the site plan in question pursuant to the requirements of Section 100-80 ( B ) [1 ] and submitted its recommendations as noted in its letter dated April 4 , 1985 ; In considering this application , the board determines : ( 1 ) the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts ; (2 ) the safety , health , welfare , comfort , convenience and order of the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location ; ( 3 ) the use is in harmony with and will promote the general purposes and intent of zoning . In passing upon this application , the board has also considered items ( a ) through (1 ) of Article XII , Section 100- 121 (C ) [2] of the Zoning Code . Accordingly , on motion by Mr . Douglass , seconded by Mr . Goehringer , it was RESOLVED, that a Special Exception be granted under No . 3328 in the Matter of the Application of BRIDEN MACHINE CORP . to establish and use the proposed one-story industrial building as a machine shop as shown on the proposed plot plan dated 12/21 /84 , received 1 /29/85 , and in accordance with the following CONDITIONS : 1 . Minimum 15 ' rearyard setback from the southerly property line (abutting land now of Penny ) ; 2 . Minimum 23 ' setback from the most easterly property line (abutting LIRR) ; 3 . Minimum 23 ' setback as proposed from the northwesterly side line (abutting land now of Boufford , 1000-141 -03-36 ) . Location of Property : 555 Westphalia Avenue , Mattituck , NY ; County Tax Map Parcel No . 1000- 141 -03-035 . Vote of the Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Grigonis , Doyen , Douglass and Sawicki . This resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of all the members . lk ,' GERARD P . UOEH INbLK, HAIRMAN May 30 , 1985 �/ Q��S�FFOIk�oy G� g Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I.. N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3329 Application Dated January 29 , 1985 Mr . Alfred E . Boufford , President [Appcllant (s) ] Briden Machine Corporation Westphalia Road , Box 881 Mattituck , NY 11952 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on May 23 , 1985 , the above appeal was considered , and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section - [X] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article VIII , Section 100-81 [ ] Request for Application of BRIDEN MACHINE CORP . , Box 881 , Mattituck , NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance , Article VIII , Section 100-81 , Bulk Schedule for permission to construct machine shop building with insufficient side and rear yard setbacks at 555 Westphalia Avenue , Mattituck , NY ; County Tax Map District 1000 , Section 141 , Block 03 , Lot 35 . WHEREAS , a public hearing was held and concluded in the Matter of the Application of BRIDEN MACHINE CORPORATION on March 28 , 1985 , and WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question as well as its surrounding area , and WHEREAS , the board has considered all testimony and documentation entered into the record in this matter , and WHEREAS , the board made the following findings of fact : 1 . The property in question is located in a "C-Light" Indus- trial Zoning District as adopted by resolution of the Town Board on November 15 , 1983, and contains a total area of 34 ,450± sq . ft . with frontage _of 156 . 75 feet along Westphalia Avenue ; 2 . The subject premises is identified as District 1000 , Section 141 , Block 3 , Lot 35 on the Suffolk County Tax Maps and is improved with one concrete block building set back 1 . 4± feet from its front property line along Westphalia Avenue and 28± feet at its nearest point from the easterly (side ) property line . 3. By this application , appellant requests relief from Article VIII , Sections 100-81 and 100-80 ( 8 ) [1 ] for permission to construct an 80 ' by 180 ' building for industrial use with an insufficient setback : (a ) from the most south-easterly property line at its nearest point eight feet; (b ) from the most south- westerly property line along land now of Penny , five feet ; (c ) from the property line along the southerly side of land now of Ruland , 10 feet . 4 . The subject premises is of a very unique character being an "L "-shaped parcel and therefore lends itself to the ( CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) �1 DATED: May 30 , 1985 . CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD (\ OF APPEALS Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) Page 2 Appeal No . 3329 - BRIDEN MACHINE CORP . Decision Rendered May 2 , 1985 practical difficulties warranted in the granting of this application . 5 . For the record it is noted that the Planning Board on April 1 , 1985 has reviewed the site plan in question and submitted its recommendations as noted in its letter dated April 4 , 1985; 6 . it is also noted that an application for a Special Exception has simultaneously been filed with this variance request under Application No . 3328 pursuant to the requirements of Article VIII , Section 100-80 (B ) [ ] ] . In considering this application , the board has determined that the relief as requested be granted since : (a ) the relief requested will not adversely affect adjoining properties ; (b ) the character and shape of the subject premises warrant the granting of the relief requested since a majority of the property would be practically unbuildable if required to meet all of the setbacks in this zoning district ; ( c ) the circumstances are unique ; (d ) in view of the manner in which the difficulties arose , the interests of justice will be served by allowing the relief as noted below. Accordingly , on motion by Mr . Douglass , seconded by Mr . Goehringer , it was RESOLVED, that a variance be granted under Appeal No. 3329 in the Matter of the Application of BRIDEN MACHINE CORP . , for permission to construct one-story building for industrial use (reduced in size to conform) SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1 . Minimum 15 ' rearyard setback from the southerly property line (abutting Penny ) ; 2 . Minimum 23 ' setback from the most easterly property line (abutting LIRR ) ; 3 . Minimum 23 ' setback as proposed from the northwesterly side line ( abutting land of Boufford (1000-141 -3-36 ) . Location of Property : 555 Westphalia Avenue , Mattituck , NY ; County Tax Map Parcel No . 1000-141 -03-035 . Vote of the Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Grigonis , Doyen , Douglass and Sawicki . This resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of all the members . lk -GERARD P . GOEHRINGER, �— AIRMAN May 30 , 1985 a, 0 �FFO(k T " .: pqS -LD S - Y 1 .31 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 4- 1985 Mr. Alfred E. Bouffard Maple Lane , P.O. Box 802 Mattitick, NY 11952 Re : Site Plan for Briden Machine located at Mattituck Dear Mr. Bouffard: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, April 1, 1985 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board is in favor of the layout of the site plan for Alfred Bouffard to be known as "Briden Machine" with the following recommendations : 1 . That the roof drainage be piped to dry wells in the parking area and 2 . That consideration be given to additional landscaping along Westphalia Avenue . If you have any questions , please don' t hesitate to contact our office . Very truly yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc : Zoning Board of Appeals , • ' I Y s • • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JpN 2g 1985 EAF ENYIROiIMENTAL ASSESSMENT -PART I Project Information rA NOTICE: This document des-lcned to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the envlrp•,ment. Please complete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide (v'1C\p any additional information you believe will be needed to complete PARTS 2 and 3. It is exoectea tnat completion of the EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF PROJECT: NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Different) Northville Industries Corp. Name 35 Pinelian Road ADDRESS AND MARE OF APPLICANT: (Street) _ Melville , N . Y. 11747 Alfred E. Bouffard �� State Zip/ d�e 516-293-4700 Maple Lane Box 802 BUStNCSS PHONE: _ (Street) 516-924-3600 Mat tituck N. Y. 11952 TFz.7 tate ( 1p DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT• (Briefly describe type of project or action) (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate N.A. if not applicable) A. SITE DESCRIPTION - - (Physical setting of overall project, both develoned and undeveloped areas) 1. General character of the land: Generally uniform slope X Generally uneven and rolling or irregular 2. Present land use: Urban Industrial .x , Commercial _, Suburban , Rural _ , Forest _, Agriculture 9ther Oil dpot 3. Total acreage of project area: -1 acres. Approximate acreage: Presently After Completion Presently After Completion Meadow or Brushland _acres _acres Water Surface Area _acres __-acres Forested acres acres Unvegetated (rock, -- -- earth or fill) _-_1_acres ---acres Aoricultural acres —acres Roads, buildings 'letland (Freshwater or and other paved Tidal as ner Articles surfaces __acres __acres ?a, 75 or F,C.L.) __acres _acres Other (indicate Lyne) _acres ._acres dpmlmant SOtl type(s) 0a mrd`,PCL site? Sdndy .— 5. E ',e :neve bedrotK outcr000inas on Irniect site' Yes X Nc t . ura: is death to bedrock? °eet) _ 6. Approxinate percentage of proposed project site with slooes: 0-107. X 1n-15E z; 15 or greater _%. �- 7. Is project contiguous to, or contain a building or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? _Yes X No 8. What is the depth to the water table? _feet 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? _Yes X No 10. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered - _Yes X :Io, according to - Identify each species 11. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? H.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations - _Yes X No. (Describe 12. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area - Yes X No. 13. Does thepresent site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? _Yes No 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N o a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary 15. Lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: N o a. Name b. Size (in acres) 16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential, R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). B1 Business & C Industria . B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage developed: _ acres initially; _ acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped d. Lengtl, of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot. age ; developed acreage f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed 9. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial Ultimate i. If: Orientation eighborhood-City-Regional Estimated Emoloyment Commercial Industrial j. Total height of tallest �r000sed structure feet. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site - tons cubic yards. 3. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site - _acres. 4. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? _Yes X_No 5. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? —Yes _No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 3 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased project: a. Total number of phases anticipated _No. b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I _month _year (including demolition) C. Approximate completion date final phase month wear. d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subseauent phases? _Yes _No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? _Yes X No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes X No. if yes,.explain: 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? _Yes X40. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial , etc.) c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? _Yes X No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? _Yes X No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? Yes X No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disoosal facility be used? _Yes X No c. If yes, give name: location d. !till any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? _Yes g_No 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? _Yes X No 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Yes X_N0 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the. local ambience noise levels? Yes X No 19. Will project result in an increase in energy use? X Yes _No. If yes, indicate types) Electric 20. If water supply is from wells indicate pumping capacity 15 gals/minute. 21. Total anticipated water usage per day _ ___gals/day. 22. Zoning: a. What is dominant Zoning classification of site? —B 1 &—C b. Current specific zoninq classification of site B 1 c. '.s or000sed use corsisten- with present zoninq? No d. If no, indicate desired zortnq 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? _Yes X No b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? __Yes _X No C. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required Submittal Approval (Yes, No) (Type) (Date) (Date) City, Town, Village Board _ City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Health Department ------ Other __Other local agencies Other regional agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies C. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid them. PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: TITLE: REPRESENTING: DATE: -a- ° EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART II Project Impacts and Their Magnitude General {Rear C!irefully) . - In completing tne form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an exoert environmental analyst. - Identifying that ar effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily sionificaot. any large effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. By identifying an e ect in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. - The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the thresh: of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally apolicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples have been offered as guidan, They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. ' INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be an effect. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a auestion then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. if impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact then consider the impact as notentially targe and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than large magnitude, place a Fes in column 3. A No response indicates- that such a reduction is not possible. 1. Z. _ 3. SMALL TO I POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE MODERATE LARr,E REDUCED BY IMPACT lNPACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON LAND NO YES 1, WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHANGE TO O O PROJECT SITE? Examples that. Would ADDly to Column 2 Any construction on elopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise ner 100 foot of lenotn), cr where the general slooes in the project area exceed 100. _ Construction on Land where the denth to the water table is less _ than 3 feet. ronstruction of paved narking area for 1 ,"n or more vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. _ Construction thal. will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than v,e Kase or stage. _ Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1 ,000 tons of natural material (i.e. rock or soil) per vear. Construction of any new sanitary landfill. _ -5- 1. 2. 3. TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE OERATE LARGE FALL REDUCED BY 'MDA T IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: 2. WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UNUSUAL LANG FORMS ES t FOUND ON THE SITE? (i.e. cliff;, dunes, geological forma- X tions, etc.) Specific land forms: IMPACT ON WATER 3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATER. BODY DESIGNATED AS .... NO YES PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Envir- onmental Conservation Law, E.C.L.) Examole5 that Would Anply to Col uhn 2 Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. _ Other impacts: 4. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY NON-PROTECTED EXISTING OR NEW �`�����N---OO+++++�, YES BODY OF HATER? ............................................V O Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body _ of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. —' Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other imnacts: �b -- S. WILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUNDWATER OIIALITY? YES O s { X Examoles that !Mould Apply to Column 2 Project will require a discharge pe unit. Project requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed project. Project requires water supply from wells with oreater _ than C5 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or coeration causing any contamination _ of a public water supply system. Project will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have — inadequate capacity. Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per day. _ Project will likely cause siltation or other discharge _ into an existing b-cy of water to the extent that there '— will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. 1. 2.. 3. MALL TC POTENTIAL CAP IMPACT BE 0DEP.ATE LARGE REDUCED OY IMPACT I"PACT PPOJEC- CwA'1GE Other Impacts 6. WILL PROJECT ALTER DRAINAGE FLOrr, PATTEP9S OR SURFACE !TATER NO YES RUNOFF? ...................................................00 Examnle that 'could Anply to Colurm 2 Project wnuld imnede flood water flows. Proiect is likely to cause substantial erosion. Project is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. hlLl PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALITY?........................... NO YES o O Fxamoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Project will Induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour, Project will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. Der hour or a heat source Producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Other Impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS ANO ANIMALS 8. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES? NO YES Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 o O Reduction of one or more species listed on the 'llew York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. _ Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wild- life habi tst. - Aonlication of Pesticide or herbicide over more than _ t0ce a vearother ttvn foragr:eaiturjl purposes. Ot'i?r impacts: 9. .1ILL PROJECT SUBSTANTIALLY AFFECT NON-THREATENED OR NO YES ENDANGERED SPECIES? .......................................0 O Examole that Would Apply to Column 2 rrglect would substantially interfere with an,, resident _ or migratory fish or wildlife species. Project reouires the removal of more than 1^ acres of _ mature forest (over 100 years in ane) or other locally important vegetation. _7_ I. 2, 3. PALL TO DCTENTIAL CAN ti'PACT of POERATE LARGE PEGUCEO of T"parr !"par' PROJECT C'IAIIOc T""r' Cj VIS"L prS�,.RrE 10. t.'ILL THE Ppn)FCT AFFECT VIEIK, °ISTAS OR TIIF 11TSO4L 9n YES CHARACTER CF THE NFIGHBORNMJO OR CO-""'IIT"? ......... . . ... �`'� X v Exam,les that Would Apply to Column 2 O An incompatible visual affect caused by the intro,'uction — of new materials, colors and/or farms in contrast to the surro undine landscape. A project easily visitle, not easily screened,t'iat is obviously different from others around it. _ Project will result in the elirination or major screeninq of scenic views or vistas known to be important to the area. 1 3 Other impacts: — IPPACT ON HISTORIC RESOURCES 6 11. WILL PROJECT 11'PACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC, NO YES PRE-kISTOPIC nP. PALEONTO6ICAL IPPOPTANCE? ................. Examples that 114ould Apply to Column 2 O _ Prciect occurinp wholly or oa rtiatly within Or contiguous — ! to any facility or site listed on the National Renister of l historic places. _ Any impact to an archeological site or fossil bed located — within the project site. II Other impacts: + I-PACT ON OPEN SPACE & RECREATION — �! 12. WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT THE QUANTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTING NO YF.S OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTU'IITIES?...... 00 tit Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. .� A major reduction of an open space important to the community. — Other impacts: IMPArT ON TRANSPORTATION 13. '.'ILL THERE EE AN EFFECT TO EXISTIIIC TRANSPORTATION NO YES SYSTE°S? .. .. .. . ...... ................. ................. G X e Examples that 'would Annly to Column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of neople I and/or goods. III C Prosect will result in severe traffic :roblems. -- ither iii-pacts: H SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT CE MODERATE LVGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO YES ENER,Y SUPPLY? .. .........................................�O Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Project causing greater than 5: increase in any form of _ energy used in municipality.. _ Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy _ ` transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences. Other impacts: IMPACT ON NOISE 15, WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, NOISE, GLARE, VIBRATION NO YES or ELECTRICAL 'DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? ....�O Examoles that Would Aooly to Column 2 Blasting within 1 ,500 feet of a hospital, school or other _ sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Project will nroduce ooerating noise exceedino the _ local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Project will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: IMPACT OM HEALTH A HAZARDS NO YFS 16. ':TILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY? .............O Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 V _ Project will cause a risk of exvlosion or release of hazardous _ substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or unset conditions, or there will he a chronic low level discharge or emission. Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc. , includinn wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid or contain gases.) Storaae facilities for one million or more gallons of liouified _ natural gas or other liquids. Other imoacts: LLL T POTENTIAL CAN [HPACT 8E OOERA.TE LARGE REDUCED BY R1P0.CT 111PACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NETGHROPWOCD 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHARACTER OF THE EXISTING NO YES COMMU4I17Y? .......................................... .... ..\J O t Example that Would Apply to Column 2 _ The population of the City, Town or Village in which the .— -- project is located is likely to grow by more than Se OF resident human population. The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or opera- --- --- ting services will increase by more than 5% per Year as a result of this project. _ Will involve any oe rmanent facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove nrime agricultural lands from cultivation. t _ The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities, — structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will induce an influx of a particular age group with special needs. 9E9 Project will set an important precedent for future projects. 1 Project will relocate 15 or more emnloyees in one ---- businesses. Other impacts: —_— 40 YES 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT? .......® O X t Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 Ii _ Either government or citizens of adjacent communities have expressed opposition or rejected the pmiect or have not been contacted. Objections to the nro.ject from within the community. L — IF ANY ACTION IN PART 2 IS IDENTIFIED A7TE;MINE POTENTIAL LARf,E IMPACT OR IF YOU CAN40T DE THE MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT, PROCEED TO PAR PORTIONS OF EAF COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT; DETERMINATION PART I X PART 11 X PART 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1, 2 and 3) and considering both the magnitude and imnortance of each impact, it is reasonably determined that: PREPARE A NErATIVE DECLARATION A. The project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, O is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case PREPARE A NErO?E DECLARATION because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been included as part of the proposed project. C. The project will result in one or more major adverse impacts PREPARE POSITIVE DECLARATION PROCEED WITH EIS that cannot be reduced and may cause significant damage to O the envA^i ro/Inm�ent. nate J Jk — -- Signature of�R�sDpnsi ole Off in Lead Agency Signa ure f Prenarer if diff r t fro . re.nor.s.ole officer) Print or t9oe naTe Cr responsiole o+frc'al in Lead Agenc, -1� EAF ` ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART III EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS INFORMATION - Part 3 is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially larae. - The amount of writing necessary to answer part 3 may be determined by answering the question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I placed in this record sufficient information to indicate the reasonableness of my decisions? INSTRUCTIONS Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 o` Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than larae impact by a pro- ject change. 3. Rased on the information available, decide if it is reasonahle to conclude that this impact is important to the minicipality (city, town or village) in which the project is located. To answer the question of importance, consider: - The probability of the impact or effect occurring - The duration of the impact or effect - Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources or values - Whether the impact or effect can be controlled - The regional consequence of the impact or effect - Its potential divergence from local needs and goals - Whether known objections to the project apply to this impact or effect. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE An action is considered to be significant if: One (or more) impact is determined to both larne and its (their) consequence, based on the review above, is important. PAPT III STATE4E4TS (Continue on Attachments, as needed) 11 RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ADOPTED ON NOVEMBER 15, 1983: WHEREAS, a petition was heretofore filed with the Town Board of the Town of Southold by ..Alfred„E..,.and..Clai.re Bouffard . ....... . . .. ............................ requesting a change, modification and amendment of the Building Zone Ordinance including the Building Zone Maps made a part thereof by chang- ing from °.B°...Light Business , District to "C” Light Industrial District the property described in said petition, and WHEREAS said petition was duly referred to the Planning Board for its investigation, recommendation and report, and its report having been filed with the Town Board, and thereafter, a public hearing in relation to said petition having been duly held by the Town Board on the .....!!t..........day of .............November .................................... 19.$3..., and due deliberation having been had thereon NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the relief demanded in said petition be, and it hereby is GRANTED. DATED: November 15, 1983 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD JUDITH T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK • i M�> Southold Town Board of Appeals 7 ✓ �� MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.L, N.Y. 11971 ?, TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI TO: Bennett Orlowski , Jr . , Planning Board Chairman FROM: Jerry Goehringer , Board of Appeals Chairman DATE : February 8 , 1985 SUBJECT: Applications Involving Planning Board We would like to bring you up-to-date and to request your comments or recommendations on each of the following matters recently filed with our office prior to the advertising deadline , if possible . (Once our hearing is concluded , no additional input legally can be accepted for consideration . ) Date Filed Matter of Tentative Deadline 2- 1 -85 /Doinick Varano (Subdivision ), 3-4-85 1 -28-85lia T. Pike (Subdivision ) 3-4-85 1 -29-85 den Machine (Site Plan , etc . ) 3-4-85 1 -28-85 Wm . & Helen Coster ( " " ) 3-4-85 1 -9-85 Joseph Lizewski (Hearing 3-7-85 ) 1 -9-85 Colgate Design ( 7- 11 , Cut ) (Hearing 3-7-85 ) 12-4-84 Cutchogue Free Library (Hearings 2- 14-85 ) 2-8-85 Saul Millman (Spec . Exc . & Var ) 3-4-85 12-31 -84 Bayview Development Corp . 3-4-85 The following matters have received your responses and have been arranged to be held for hearings in the immediate future : Thomas Perillo (Hearing 2-14-85 ) Robert and Aldona Norkus (Hearing 3-7-85* ) John and Frances DiVello (Hearing 3-7-85* ) Alice D. Currie (Hearing 3-7-85 ) Meehan and Leonardi (Hearing 3-7-85 ) Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI TO : Office of the Planning Board (Attn : Diane ) FROM: Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals (Attn : Linda ) DATE : March 18 , 1985 SUBJECT : Applications Pending with Z . B .A. and Planning Board To bring you up-to-date and to request your comments or recommenda- tions , the following matters have been filed since our last memorandum to you dated February 8 , 1985 , and will require action by the Planning Board : Matter of Tentative ZBA Hearing irmiden inick Varano , by R. Lark April 11th as req . Machine March 28th William and Helen Coster by R. Lark April 11th as req . Joseph Lizewski April 11th Colgate Design (7- 11 , Cutch . ) W. Esseks May 2 Saba/Kislow/Sujeski May 2 Howard L . Young & Wf . May 2 Sobering by P . Cardinale , Esq . May 2 or 23 Vitale May 23 P . Reinhart , R . Bruer , Esq . May 23 H . Conway , R. Bruer , Esq . May 23 or June 13 Perricone & Cimini , R . Bruer , Esq . June 13 Pindar Winery June 13 or 20 Peconic Vineyards June 13 or 20 Cliffside Assoc . /Tetaldi /Tide Mark June 13 or 20 TOWN �1, ., NO 14796 0 ! _, ,,. $ ' TOWN OF S York 16 765.1501 � p New York Southold, N 1197J—z�19 --� Suffolk County, $ i R IVSD O cv Judith T. Terr��pp Town Clerk PLANTING SCHEDULE I A KEY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE QTY. 'I iY1 PA. LONDON PLANETREE PLATANUS ACERFOLIA I 1/2-2'CAL. 2 PI -P COLORADO SPRUCE PICA PUNGENS 3'- 4' FL I \ BE-L CUT LEAF BIRCH BETULA LACINIATA 2_21/2'CAL I JU-H BLUE JUNIPER JUNIPERUS HETZI GLAUCA 2-Til FT 5 JU-C COMPACT PFITZER JUNIPE JUNIPERUS COMPACTA 15'-18. 3GAL 5 JU-P GOLD TIP PFITZER JUNIPERUS PFITZERIANA 2 -21/2 FT 5 JUNIPER o� E A N r p. i I �F IA,� p0� WESTPNALIA 41� �/'-•Li 7� AVE S7 0Og4 00„e p p a gr \O ? P4 JUTp SE Top /S6 PA x' N soi<e° 4 ?S• pro i d h sEFoep e 4ti ° 5 /0 / J° 0 l � x i Jo I 4 w ry e bICD,ING NG P/-P C / BF'C LOCATION MAP 1 ”, 200' 4v 4y °p W. 2 ? 13 �e.o.V / 3 \• Ct \ 16 /0?23 \ Ca bo �a +ys N 63°z 3000,, w \ o \ 0' °°, ap 0 O .o'o, SPa cO3 s + c0 vc o scar so. 110, CO po q� c02c/yi�y Q �. 3 9l OOL 01- 00, r.0 X04- \0 9 \� 2s QP oma, �1 \ a ^ / e+s ^XJP CPO^ ^+s H 9P / < A / V90ov ^° ��o Pip SITE PLAN PREPARED FOR P',y °% 9 �5� BRIDEN MACHINE CORP AT MATTITUCK � TOWN OF SOUTHOLD "41sTryP \Fo � �\\\ soh SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK a 1901, \ 5. oyP OI� SITE DATA / I, SUFF CO TAX MAP NO. DIST, 1000 SECT. 141 SK 03 LOT 35 / 2. LOT AREA = 34450 S F 3 EXISTING BUILDING AREA = 1114 SF 4. PROPOSED BUILDING AREA = 11900 ST ' 1 6. NOTAL OF PARIKINING AREA z G STALLS = 163014 S.F. JAN 6 RECO J Sl PIE OF NEp Q I °CPPD W ** - O DATE; JAN.2, 1986 YO NG SCALE: I"= 20' 40 OSTR ER AV NU NO.: 85-1564 AIPs,#F!/ R ON HO AY°1SOt%U Y.Y.S.F 845 L.S. NO. 45893 ►I I - .. .. C..xrr corn RI .k..d,L 1., N.n Y.rk ASYM O.1000 e.wo..n. ROIlRTY MAI +_�Ie❑SII -- '_ _.. I I I I ». wkE d Al i • � N u a ♦'� a ., S e � i IESTPHALy /a 4 x•', „�. �' I. j�'l . AYE�+.u•ri. � + a • V y • ry � a r � • 9 ti a n a a _ • / 9� des 10-4 y„wo J A go* O 9 e M " `• �� Y~ ^ � `y,Md 4 W,e�jp.rY H uv J/ s�yyrr of a 9 FJ " s _,p roa.um m su gc o L _ — •�.• ,zu -- -- ,rx..w-- -- m ROTA © COUNTY OF SUFF SECTUR ra E ,",,"' -- -- -- .....nW— -- n.mm..mn,yc.,m Real Property iax Service Agency c m.: SOUTNOLu _ D _: v" "� w s��= --- _-•- -.w---- °. ^° I«.,,y 1«„K w� yw- x. NI -- �— rtK Al6llr r vnn.asa. VYF x iHL ���. S P mm s '� PROPERTY IW wnt inrt� - v C J 5. 7 D /All" A LO V E 4,*56 S-r 1 N6 114440 SF 2e 0 V 117 PS V91, b 01D C) - w r RECEIVED BY V- IMB 4? 101985 DATE D F� 0 p 0 5 E-- I- OT P rc )1E C7 LAON ROSENTHAL PRC 41 in it AU 98.9 SUNFMVE HIGHWAY 0 A 8 y t4L%WK 1-3530 lA0ti Ig