Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-138.-1-2.1 THIS MINOR SUBDIVISION IS FOR 3 LOTS ON 1 O -RES LOCATED�@Nat- i1, en a1' iNonse II LAn IN SCTM# 1000- 138- MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) Complete application received Application reviewed at work session rAW'Q a Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised submission received W 07K Sketch plan approval -with conditions Lead Agency Coordination � SEQRA determination LZJJ q i_,� 44 , 3 IvQz. �Bw� K „ Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewell location Notification to applicant to include on final map Sent to County Planning Commission AW oK Receipt of County Report Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received oK Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed taro. oK Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval . Final Public Hearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions Endorsement of subdivision �- MARIE ONGIONI ATTORNEY AT LAW 2/S FRONT STREET. GREENIORT. NEW YORK 1)S44 15161477-20" FAX(6101 477-OP 19 January 15, 1991 Valarie Scopaz, Town Planner Town of Southold A - a 53095 Main Road C Southold, New York 11971 Re Annlication of Thomas Monsell to Subdivide Thrace Acres in Cutchoaue. New York SCTM # 1000/13$/1/2. 1, 9. 1. 13. 1 and 14 Lots 1-6 6 49-54 in Mao of Norwold in #1275 Dear Ms. Scopaz : I enclose the following in connection with the above: 1. Owners Affidavit 2 . Questionnaire 3. Letter re: roads 4. Six surveys 5. Description of property 6. Deeds to property 7. Suffolk County Tax Map e For your information, these were originally many small lots in the filed Map known as Norwold. Many of the lots have merged and my client wishes to create three one acre lots. I also enclose my clients check in the sum of $2,500. 00 as follows: 1. $1, 000.00 inspection fee 2. $500. 00 per lot JAN 2 2 10 Please review the papers. If you require anything further please advise. Otherwise, my client respectfully requests prompt sketch approval. Very truly yours, MARIE ONGIONI MO/jb Enclosures APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentafive) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Lav and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... . .. .. .... .. ........... . .. . .. .'. .. . . .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .... ...... ............. . ... . .. .. .. .. .... ...... ............. . ... . . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber . ..�� �'UU�... .... . . .. . Page ....1 ffp . .. . . . . . . .. . On . ..�.:J..:�1...... ... . ; Liber . 1/6P14..f ........... ... Page . . . 3P.('.. .. . . .. ..... On . . . ... . . . . . . . . ; Liber .. .. .. ...... .. . Page . .. Liber ..J4 q.l. ...... .. .... . Page . ..30G.... . . .. .. .. . On ..�.. ; Liber ..nr 3 .7. ............. Page . . .sa.7. . . .. .. .. ... On . .S— =�3 as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . .. . . .... .... .. .. .. .... . ... .. .. . . . . .. . . oras distributee . ........ ...........:.. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . ... .. .. ... ......... . . . . ... . . . .. . . .. .. .. ...... .. .... ....................... . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . ..... .. ................ .. . 5. The area of the land is . .. ..3.. .. . . .. ... acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the (late hereof have been paid eKeept ..... .. .... . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .... ......... . . .... ........ . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. ... .......... ... 7. The ]ancliNencumbered 4r. .. .. ...... .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. . . .... .. ..... .......... . .. . mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mor recorded in Liber . .. .... . . .. .. . Page . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. .. . in original amount of $. . . . . .. .. . . . . . unp ' nount $ ... .. . . . . . . :. . . . . . .. . held by . . . .. .. .. address . .. .. .. ...... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . .. ........ . .. . . . (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .... . . . . Pal-e . .. .. . . . .. .. ... in original amount of . .. .. . . .. . . . . . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . held b . .. .. .... .. . . . address JAN I a (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .. .... . . ..... Page ... .. . ... .. ..... in original amount of . .... .. ...... . unpaid amount . .. ... . . . .. . held by ............ ... ... .... ........ ....... address .. .... .. .. ........ ..... ..... .... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land exeel* , .......... .. ............ ........ . 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts . ............ . ..... .. .. ... ....2.:" . . . . .. ...I....... 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept .f?�. .!�7.l�.(.��T�Q.... �h /yl1.!?P. �..f4l�l�1!) Mj09W /pi�icrep 6y /�aoue� U Tuy ..�..c..� 1� 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (mss.), (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. ... .. .... .. .. . . .. . 13. Water mains will be laid by .. .. .. .. .. .. .. and (a) (no) charge will be !Wade for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . .. .. . . .... .. .... .... .... .. . . .. .. .... . ... lines. • • and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said 15. Gas mains will be installed by . , , and (a) (no) charge lulll be m•, , ,ade for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County IIighway system, annex Schedule "L"' hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing Public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing' buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19• Where the plat shows Proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining division neaps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said Existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. snb- 20. In the course of these proccecliugs, the apPlicall[ 335 of the heal Property Law. will oiler proof of title as required by Sec. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showin; all Schedule "D".' restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $•.•.•.... . as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at ... .. ...... . ... years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE .. a..: ........... .. .. ...... 19....G .. I ... .. .. (Name of Applicant) By . .. .. ...... .... .... . ... ...... .. .. .... . ....:: ' (Signature and Title) . .. .... .. .. .............. .................. . ... . (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF .SKF I??.N,K ...... .. • , ss: On the . ..3 Fd. . .. .... .. . day of. .. .• • •, • • , 19• • •1)0 before me personally came "' I Q �S•• •••��1�l S!' • ... . . to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . .... .. .. ... executed the same. MAFF ONGIONI NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No. 14.4715191 . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .... .. Quo Mod in K;nga County Notary Public CommWion Etpk"R;j_ r 194?2, - STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . .... .. . ... . . . . . . .... .. .... . ss: On the . .. .... . . .. ... . . day . .. .. .. .. .. . of . . . . . .. .. . .. . ., 19... .. ., before me personally came . .. . . . .. . to me known. who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that . .. .. .. .. .. . resides at No. . .. .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . . ... . .. . . .. .. .... . .......... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. ..... . . . . .. . . . .. . that . .. .. . . is the .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. . . . .. . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . of . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .... .. . . .. .. .. .. .. ... .. ..... . . .. . . . the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that . .. .. . . . . .. . knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. :uod that . . . . . . . .. . . . signed . . . . . . . .. . . .. . name thereto by like order. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. .. .. . . .... . . . . ...... . .. . . Notary Public 516-725-1708 MOW HTOMMUR HE The Environmental Research, Construction & Development Co. P. O. Box 1640 Southampton, New York 11968 Philip Anderson, Pres. January 18 , 1991 Cover Page For Monsell Minor Subdivision EAF Part I 3 Lot : 40 , 000 sq . ft . min . per lot Total area is 3 acres , on Mud Creek , Cutchogue R-40 Zone Tax Map No : 1000-138-1 -2 . 1 , 9 . 1 , 13 . 1 and 14 EAF Part I attached . Client ' s Attorney : Ms . Ongioni 218 Front Street Greenport , New York 516/477-2048 Environmental Consultant : Anderson Environmental , Inc . P . 0 . Box 1640 Southampton , NY 11968 Philip Anderson , President Surveyor-Planner : Roderick VanTuyl Front Street Greenport , New York JAN 2 21991 Construction Management — Subdivision Concept Planning — Real Estate Development Analyses Environmental Impact Statements — Environmental Permit Applicatons — Approval to Construct Applications Field Inspections and Buildability Studies T Town Hall, 53095 Main Road v' `•''• P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: All applicants to the Planning Board FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman RE: Correspondence to Planning Board Office DATE: August 15, 1988 The Planning Board office processes a large volume of correspondence every day. You can help us process this mail (and ultimately your application! ) in a more efficient manner by doing the following: 1. Submiting cover letters with all materials. The cover letter should state: A) the name of the project and b) the Suffolk County Tax Map number of the property. c) the reason for the submission of the material. d) a telephone number where you can be reached during normal office hours. 2 . Submitting only complete applications Keeping track of items submitted under separate cover takes up a disproportionate amount of staff time and space. Keep in mind that complete applications are given immediate attention. Incomplete applications are likely to be returned. Thank you for your cooperation. jd 1416-2 (2187)-7c 617.21 SEQ Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review C FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The, full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a proje. or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequen ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determin significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environment: analysis. In addition,many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectin the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatio process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec • data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provide guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not th. impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: Ill Part 7 C ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions THOMAS MONSELL MINOR SUBDIVISION Name of Action SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD 765-1938 Name of Lead Agency _Bennett Orlowski Jr Chairman Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency i/'y � Title of Responsible Officer =lignalure Officer in Lead Agency 4tanatureof Prepof Preparer(If different from res ponsible officer) D PC PI11t1ii!r QQn Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is des' t*Moist in deterrrtftring whether the action proposed may have a significan on the envirorirnerit. Please corr~ft a ttbe font, Pacts A throf`ugh E. Answers to these questions wilUbe;e as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review.Proves arty information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of:the frill EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not irwob, new studies,research or Investigation. If Information t"WrInasuch additional,work Is un"iWsolndlcateand specii each instance. NAME 00 ACTION fOQR'frnN Cf� it ,ArMMR ._' - IUMF13W17Z.I, i '13T, ins 14. _ MonsIll Lane Cutcho ue N. Y. Suffolk Co , Lots1-6 & 49-54inlbpof , filed NAME OF AFPLICAMISPONSOR an V173ADDRESS Thomas Monsell i First Street -_ STATE P 000E cmlPo Green ort N.Y. 11-9.4k- NAME 2t4k _ NAME OF MMrER pr dIii;;;nnt) -- BUBINESS YUEPHONE. ( i ADDRESS - CITYIPO - _. T STATE LP:CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION - ---- - _-- Subdivide parcel into three 40, 000 sq . foot lots . Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Sitei 0406011tert Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential(suburban) „7Rurai(non-fare, Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 3 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTE COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 3 acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) _•al acres •T acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres �I acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres • rs� acres Other (indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil types)on project site? Z�aaA im"amp AM,ualgsrzar r.: a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained AM % of site ❑Moderately well drained LQ % of site ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY Land Classification System? ` acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Dyes ®No Y a. What is depth to bedrock? 1000+ (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percP.ntage of proposed projec t�e with slopes: ❑o-1006 ° 010-15% 015% or greater % 6. Is'project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes CXNo •. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ONO 8. What is the depth of the water table? 4+ (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes CXNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? CbYes ONO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes CXNo According to P . R .ANDERSON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT Identify each species 12. Are therye,, any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) 61Yes ONO Describe .. Wetlands 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes C7INo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes (ANO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Mud Creek to Cutchoaue Harbor a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Mud Creek to Cutcho ue Harbor 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Meadow unnamed 09 ac �Cb. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ❑Yes hNO a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ❑Yes ONO NA b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes ONO NA 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes X]No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Articlo 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? )Yes ONO Tidal Wetlands 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes INNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor R b. Project acreage to be developed: 3 acres initially; 3 acres. P c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped O acres. acres ultimately. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed NA %; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 _ ; proposed $ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour A (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housingunits: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 3 CUltimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 30 ,_ height: 1 .5(1 ' width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ..42.01_. ft. length. . 3 2. How muctt"natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tonslcubiF yards, 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? MYes ONO ❑NIA a. If yes, for what intendcc purpose is the site being reclaimed? Scenic .yards b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? MYes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? §IYes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Oyes ONo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction in months, (including demolition). 7. If mufti-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated NA (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent,,phases? Dyes ONO 8. Will blast 11Q8 occur during construction? Dyes PNo 9. Number o(Ijobs generated: during construction 30 after project is complete 5 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes (INO If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes 05No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? QYes ONO Type Sewaae - Household 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes X7No - Explain 14. Is projector any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ®Yes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Rlyes ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month 1 tons b. if yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Oyes ONO Landfill c. if yes;( give name Town Landfill ; location d. Will ady wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Oyes Plo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Mes ONO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 1 tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 200+ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes INNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes X7No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes BIND 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? PYes ONO If yes , indicate type(s) Flectric , heat-oil or gas 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 30 gallonsiminute, r 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or federal funding? Oyes bNO If Yes, explain 4 e srrr 2s. Approvals Required: _ Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes MNo City, Town, Village Planning Board LAYes ❑No Subdivision Approval Concurrent City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes INNo City, County Health Department Wes ❑No Other Local Agencies ❑Yes qNo Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes qNo State Agencies 13OYes ❑No _ NYS DF(. 9 Federal Agencies ❑Yes WNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? MYes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit Klsubdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other _ 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum Potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 3 1 -acre lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? R-40 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 3 1 -acre lots C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? QYes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? 1 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? IllYes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? _ Z a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 40 , 000 s q . f t . 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes K1No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? NYes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? gYes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes PNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them, E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. LApplicant/Sponsor Name Phi I i p Anderson Pres Anderson Env Inc Date 1 -17-1991 Signature Tide Environmental Consultant-Planner If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you erre stale agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 k�t 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND -n-IEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and.determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts;''bf each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each:question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by changes) in the project to a small to?moderate impact, also cheek the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 { Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Chance. 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? %INO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Constructiononland where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. D ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C1 No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 2. Will there be an effect V. ...ty un.que or unusual land forms found on the site?0,e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)EXNO DYES • Specific land forms: Tidal Wetlands ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact B 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Cham (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) Examples that would apply to column 2 QSINO OYES • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑N� • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ Dyes ON, protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. El ❑ ❑Yes ❑N • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N- 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ®NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ®NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ 1-1 Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ supply system. El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently El 13 ❑Yes F-1 No Dyes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ day. ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ existing body of waver to the extent that there will be an obvious visual ❑Yes ❑No contrast to naturai conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ and/or sewer services. ❑ �TJYes E3 No • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ �� require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage ❑Yes ❑No facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No 6. Willp pro osed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? UNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact tae Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Proms thanie • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ Yes El No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes DNo IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? IKINO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ D DYes []No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ D []Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a D D Dyes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ D Dyes QNo development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ Q Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS d. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered C species? RINO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal D ❑ []Yes No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. D D ❑Yes DNo Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ D -DYes DNo than for agricultural purposes. ' Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes DNo Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? KINO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or Q Cl 11 Yes []No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ Q of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important []Yes QNo vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO DYES The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ C3 Yes El No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 • 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact B- Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Chang- • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ agricultural land. No • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ C3land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, Dyes ❑No strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ®NO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether ❑ []Yes ❑No man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ []Yes. ONo aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their Cenjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. El Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? QONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially j] ❑ contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register Dyes El No of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ project site. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ' ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13, Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 UNO OYES The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. 11 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes QNo ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 13 No 9 IMPACT ON TRANVORTATION "OCOYes .3 an tmpact•Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Mitigatted.By Examples that would apply to column 2 QNO OYESroject Chatlpe • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. Yes ❑No• Other impacts: Oyes ONO ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERQY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? PNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ any form of energy in the municipality. ❑Yes ONO [ • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ E Oyes ONO E transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? (ANO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ facility. ❑Yes ONO • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ El Yes ONO • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ noise screen. ❑ Dyes ❑No ' Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Examples that would apply to column 2 JPNO DYES ' Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of ❑ ❑Yes ONO accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. ;Gr L Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, ❑ ❑Yes ❑No infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ gas or other flammable liquids. ❑ ❑Yes ONO Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ « ' ❑ within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous Dyes ❑NO waste. r Other impacts: ❑ t� ❑ ❑Yes ONO 10 ........_.....-.,. .,, • ,,. f 7771. ! ,�,qua i" , 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? impact Impact Project Change CANO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services 13 El ❑Yes �No will increase by more than'5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ Dyes []No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ` • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ClE3 ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? CINO OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be'potentially large, even if the impact(s) may b= mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s) 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. C (Continue on attachments) 11 t 14.14.11 (2:37)-9c 617.21 SEAR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource * (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0.1/4 1/4.1/2 1/2.3 3.5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation - of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ Cl as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ -scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(i.e., screeried by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes ❑No �s 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ❑No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within * Essentially undeveloped *'/+ mile 1 mile❑ El ❑ ❑ Agricultural El Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial El Urban ❑ ElRiver, Lake, Pond El ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks El E]Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat Hilly ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Mountainous El El El El add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *'/z mile 1:1 Yes ❑No *1 miles El Yes No *2 miles ❑Yes No *3 miles ❑Yes ❑No ' Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Activity Holidays/ Dy Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work EJ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ . ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 P� Ta ,I d 50u QLD SU Fare mY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer- to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence: 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes No (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? Yes No 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes No 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency? (Town , State, County, etc. ) Yes No 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? Yes No 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? Yes No 7. Does this property have a valid certificate of occupancy, if yes please submit .a copy of same Yes No I certify that the above statements are true and will be relied on by the Planning Board in considering this application. blgn�o property own uthorize —� IRQ �4�'•Rtjyy dat Attachment to questionnaire for::the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, CO TY OF SUFFOLK, ss: ' On the day of 19 G before me personally came to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that execu the s ^ tary Public MARIE ONGiONI NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No. 24-47,SIyi Quofified in'y(n9N�/,J/[/_County 9 COMMiYion Zpirsy V 1 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: srlO01✓. O/. T�lorri aS /YJ0%st _ Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. �/ (2) No new roads are propoossedAand no changes wi1T be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, T H-d M H• 5 M o n S-eL C_, JAN 22Ma 1 s- � 1 ' 0- »' , i7 Y .... -. .. . ��I� . '�,`� .: 1��� Y, e, d.... ., r• i fry' .4h wl 7 IVie' S JAN 2 2 I €,I I� i At 1 ,� s. y Pn - _-...._____-----�_. r l t RODERICK VAN TUYL (L.S.) COLIN VAN TUYL RODERICK VAN TUYL, P. C. Licenced Lend SurveYon 218 FRONT STREET GREENPORT,NEW YORK 11944 (518)477-0170 January 16, 1991 Description : Property of Thomas Monsell at "Norwold" Beginning at a point on the easterly line Of Monsell Lane at the southwesterly corner of the "Landing" , shown on "Map of Norwold" , filed in Suffolk County Clerk' s Office as map no. 1275 ; running thence along the southerly line of said "Landing" S. 78°00"E.-90 feet, more or less, to the ordinary high water mark of the northerly branch of Baldwin' s Creek; thence southerly along said high water mark 530 feet, more or less, to land of Dunhuber; thence along said land of Dunhuber N. 89014 ' 30"W.-272 feet more or less; thence continuing along said land ' and along land of Tangney N.0119 ' 30"W.-563 .11 feet to the southwesterly corner of lot no. 10 shown on said map of "Norwold" ; thence along said lot no. 10 N.89°40' 30"E.- 100. 61 feet to the westerly line of Monsell Lane; thence easterly across Monsell Lane 25 feet to the "Landing" ; thence southerly along the westerly line of the "Landing" 30 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Containing 3.0 Acres . Roderick Van Tuyl To : Marie Ongioni, Esq. " 22 Seandaed N'Y R,].U,e,.,,n 40n;.9.]P- p .ga.n � S Ir Pend, wrth Covenmr a reran P mr , ,', An recti d al or Corporawn 1,'mgle sheer) 11 CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE S .PIING T/I1S INSTRUMENT—THIS INSTRUMENT OULD BE USED BY LAWYERS 0M LIDER 7030 rAcE 384 lob THIS INDENIVRE, made the day of October nineteen hundred and severity-one ETWFEN GEORGE MONSELL, residing at 2008 E. 52nd Street, Brooklyn, i w York, party of the first part, and THOMAS O. MONSELL, residing at 525 First Street, Village of Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, U party of the second part, } WITNESSETH,that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs` or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, I lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, 1 bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwest corner of the subdivision "NORWOLD" 00 filed as Map Number 1275 in the Office of the Clerk of Suffolk County, being � the southwest corner of Lot No, 1 thereon; thence N t N. 890 14' 30" W. - 375. 00 feet; thence Southeasterly 125. 00 feet, more or less; thence S. 890 141 30" E., 380 feet, more or less; thence N. 00 191 30" W. , 115 feet to the point or place of beginning. Being the parcel of land shown on said map entitled "Jessie Baldwin to George Monsell", and being one acre, more or less. AEAI ESTATE Sil��'1'f ,r .�� TRANSFER TAX 'NEW '" _ &F ►r'loos * r TOGETIIER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenance) and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. i AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the rt, in nce the first partrtrw ill f tile first receive he consideration afor this conveyance andion 13 of he Lien Law covenants willhold he night to receive such consid- eration the as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN FAMENCtS or: l V i O - E' Geor e,Monsell k m- see STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY ortld�g 703[ rAv �' ''1� STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF Kings r IX!11'. , On the /Y� day of October, 1971 before me On the day of 19 personally came personally came GEORGE MON SE LL, to me known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual de;crit,ed In and who executed the foregoing instrument, and njwledged that executed Cuter the ages instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. �/ t NOT RY PUBLIC MEMA w MIX mon M• S °SK}a,i+ o f Mtw York Nhey OHt 54 SIG%Or IMr; Yc-• No♦try �W a 1 i H& 244200'n,5 Wo. a4-q 00771111" CwwrY COWAI;MT , e:-a,: h'CTA YA 1f)✓ fLoNMfS�Io tAmitts MAS eff j0, I'1M STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF sss STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF Ras 19 before me On the day of 19 before me On the day of personally came to the personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and whom subscribing mperson.personally acquainted,whogbeing bymme duly say that he resides at No. sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. i that he is the that he knows of , the corporation described to be the individual in and which execute the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and w to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, saixecute hersame;tandsth t� prehe5tnt said witness, affixed by-order of the board of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto, pargain stub orale. ;Beeb SECTION WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS BLOCK TITLE NO. LOT COUNTY OR TOWN GEORGE MONSELL TO THOMAS O. MONSE LL Recorded At Request of '1'hs Tidy Gusnnree CDNpMF ' - RETURN BY NAEL TO: STANDARD tORAE Of NEW YORK BOARD of vnu uRDtRwkntu Dbrr"red by Irving L. Price, Jr. 711E TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Attorney at Law Gr Main Street Greenport, New Yor$ Zip " w u o z - so Be u e�► moo y rra _j bc o v G `Cr WJ gD 47 O ._ to W toiY W - t J W � 1 W CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT—THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD R[USED BY LAWYlRS ONL' I i THIS INDENTURE, made the day of nineteen hundred and BETWEEN BERNARD GELMAN, residing at 83-1 116th St . , Keweighty-six Gardens, ; NY �g i party of the first part, and THOMAS 0. MONSELL, residing at 525 First St . , villFl o (3reenport , Town of Southold, NY 11944 , party of the second parr, WITNESSETH, that the party of rite fast part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or aaccessI. and assigns of the party of the second part forever, all his undivided one–half tehrest . in lying anJtl certain Plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and imProvements thereon erected, situate, y g r tcal>R at Cutchogue , Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known as Lot 6 on map entitled, "Map of ` Norwold" , surveyed by Otto Van Tuyl, C. E. , which said map was f filed in the Suffolk County Clerk' s Office, Riverhead, NY on 3/13/39 as Map No . 1275 . DISTRICT SECTION BLOCK LOT K. TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and mads abutting the above described premises to the center linea thereof; TOGETHER with the apputteruntry and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; ,TO HAVE premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or O HOLD the sucteasors:utd aasigA AND Tof the party of the - second part forever. AND doe pari), of the first part covenants that the patty of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first Part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first Part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration as is trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "Party" shall be construed as if it read "Parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the written. first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRFseNce OF: BE RD GEL N 3290 iyMntd N.T.0 .1.U, rma,9002, ""Im end Say an W, with Ce..rnn91 Atnlgt nnntoi,Acy jndl.Idoot 2,Cetprngtipq, sirATtOf mw YORK,COUNTY Of QUEENS a: STAT!Of NEW YORK,COUNTY Of pt On the day of 19 8 6 ,before me On the day of 19 before me personally came BERNARD GELMAN personally arae to we known to be the individual described in End who to me known to be the inditAdttal described in sad who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the l6regoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. executed the same• Notary Public STATS Of N1IW YilliIt,'COUNTY Of pt STit'1'li OF taw Tow OOUom of nt On the day of 19 before me On the day of 19 before me personally came Petseaalty nate to me known, who, be utg by me duly sworn, did depose and the atrbac' ' wrineas to the fore ittactmgent,with say that he teitklea at Nu. f rapt ae�sitteed;Mbi; j ir ttatr, " dePeW a m may that he Beads at' fht sbl that he is the ; the corporation described that he knows in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he to be the individind knows the seal of said corpnretim that the seal affixed to said described in and who executed the ftugoahtg insnnmeti *an instrument is such corporate seal; that it wag so affixed by order be.ski subscribing witaas,was Peertet and saw of the boardofdirectors of said corporation, and that he execute the ssax; and that he, said witness, at the acme signed It nime therein by like order. time subscribed h name as witness thereto. BARGAIN AND SALE DEED SECTION WITH CovitNANT AGAINST GRANTOR$ ACTS BLOCK , _ LOT COUNTY OR TOWN . BERNARD GELMAN TO Recorded at Request of COMMONWEALTH LAND ' ' TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY THOMAS 0. MONSELL asmuaN BY MAL TO: sntawaAS#W OF New VW MA*b of Teats a+etWMM"w WICKHAM, WICKHAM £t BRESSLER. PC ; Oxnaw.rs. Main Road - P.O. Box 1424 a, Ttyh�tttuRlawetnrrr Matti tuck, NY zip Na.1195 2 �c!"or+lt+dM W V E 0 O z A rn a: y�. v W N vW 6< N N C] N� IoW �+f Stand n i t tl. ,� 8102 4V gain anA Sale Deal,wirh r menanu aFiimt fnanmrl Am,—InAtvirlml or forpu,alua (dng4,Feer( CON se t1vouR LAWYER BEFORE Sle"'Ho THIS INSTRUMINT•THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD IS USED ET LAWYERS ONLY THIS INI)EN'rURE, made thr 14+11 day of April nineteen hundred and el ht g y-si- i0 NYS TRANc BETWEEN THOMAS O. MONSELL, residing at 525 First Street, Village` 'ER STAMPS o Greenport , Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY 11944, 10_ CONSIDE TION party of the first part,and THOMAS 0. MONSELL, residing at 525 First Street , Village of Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY 11944 and BERNARD GELMAN, residin4 at 83-10 116th Street, Kew Gar ens , NY .1418, J� I party of the second part, WITNL•$SET'ff, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable consideration! paid ty the partv of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs;' I or succi ss ns and assigns of the party of the second part forever, } ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate,t lying and heing in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows : DISTRICT BEGINNING at the southwest corner of the subdivision "NORWOLD" filet 790— as Map Number 1275 in the Office of the Clerk of Suffolk County, SECTION being the southwest corner of Lot No. 1 thereon; , 11KZT RUNNING THENCE North 89° 14 ' 30" West 375 . 00 feet; BLS OCCK� RUNNING THENCE Southeasterly 125. 00 feet, more or less ; LOT. RUNNING THENCE South 89° 14 ' 30" East, 380 feet, more or less ; 014 .001x` RUNNING THENCE North 0" 19 ' 30" West , 115 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. BEING the parcel of land shown on said map entitled "Jessie Baldwin // to George Monsell" , and being one acre, more or less. r BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises conveyed to THOMAS 0. MONSELL by Deed dated 10/12/71 and recorded 10/15/71 in the Suffolk ,- County Clerk' s Office in Liber, 7030, page 384._ '— REr IVED ' REAL ESTATE i 4 f. JUN 10 9881 t : TRANSFER TAX i COUNTY (J TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if an of the e party of the firstpart in and to any slrr. an 1 roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtr.l r.., and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE A]'I(: ';'I) \ HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigrs of \� the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid+.' enation as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apQ1y the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for, any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indempre so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and yel first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: �o omas 0. Moose �'— 1"54 9-38-7 F STATE Or MEW YORK COUNTY Or SUFFOLK Ste STAT! OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF EEt On the /11Zday of April , 19 86, before me On the day of 19 before me personally came THOMAS 0. MONSELL, personally came to me known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who f executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. executed the same. £LNGF ,•.OGLUCCI Notary Pu C , Plutary publir„ State of:New York tJ-,. 4791477 Qu-dilird In SuNnik County 6, umds;cln❑ f,,+os Mau•h 40, i , STATI Or MEW YORK, COUNTY Or IS: STATS OF NEW TORR. COUNTY Or '3'• On the day of 19 before me On the day of 19 beIol : we personally came personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, .lid depose and the subscribing witness to the' forevoing- instrument; with say that he resides at No. whomI am personally a*j*nfed who, being by line daily sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. ' that he is the % of that he'knows the corporation described to be the individual in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed described in and who executed the foregoing instttmxftt; to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so ildit� he, saidpubs;gibm witness, was present Rod saw affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- a utll the mine; and that he, mid witttt#a, tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. WITIi COVENANT ACAINST GRANTORS ALTs SECTION TITLE NO.. BLOCK. .LOT THOMAS 0 MONSELL COUNTY OR TOWN ` TO 'HOMAS 0. MONSELL and BERNARD GELMAN xemfde! at Revivivit of CHICAGO Tnia INSURANCE COMPANY $T*JM&flb FO*OF*10TOM Ml1Ra OF TITLE UaDEPARITER3 r p6wbuted by ,WICKHAH, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P,Cj:, MAIN ROAD - P.O. BOX 1424 HATTITUCKF NEW ,YORK 1]: .„ V O r` N z p 0 0 p ,t.LN110" �..I�Il3(1S 30 ?131J _ � V'1'1;'�`II`i � 7.1.1311t1r Lt N _ I1-lf4n0*1 w � , i tiundaul N Y.P I. Finn N1n2 4u1 ain uul 5 I Ord, v.,h C..rnanla again I(;,an.....,{,u 1 dm „,. CONSULT YOUR LAWYER EIFORI SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT•THIS INSTRUMINT SHOULD BE USED�BY LAWYERS ONLY THIS INDENTURE, made tirenineteen hundred and �I�� da of a�� Sever y ' , eighty—a" BETWEEN .JAMES 1. MONSELL, residing at 509 First Street, Greenport, New York; THOMAS 0. MONSELL, residing at 525 First Street, Greenport, New York;. and GEORGE MONSELL, residing at 518 Beach 139th Street, Rockaway, New York 11694 party of the first part, and THOMAS 0. MONSELL, residing at 525 First Street, Greenport, New York party of the sec"nd part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate^ lying and being instba Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State cr New York, known as Lots 1 to 6 inclusive, on a certain mapentitled "Map of b Norwold", and filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on DISTRICT 3/13/39 as Map No. 1275. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE part of the same premises conveyed to the grantors herein by deeds described in Liber 2194, cp. 36 and Liber 4582, cp 80 recorded SECTION in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office. SUBJECT TO Covenants and Restrictions recorded in Liber 3009, cp. 298. BLOCK SUBJECT TO Right of Way recorded in Liber 1961, cp 575. SUBJECT TO Telephone Agreement recorded in Liber 2058, cp. 463. I.0'r , 210 TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO, HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns(of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anythittg whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first pant wilf'receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid• ` oration as a bust' Rand to,be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the imbT6vement and will apply the sae first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part off the total of the same (o mr any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indentitre so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the fir;phas duty executed this deed the day and year first awritten. IN PRESENCEOF; I. MONSELL / (I THOMAS 0. MONSELL UtURGa NONSELL t; STATS OF NRW YORK. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK SSi STATE OF NSW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 11t On the '>f� day of 9ess:,ber r 19 86 , before me On the '� � day of Osvus � 19N6 before me personally came personally came JAMES 1. MONSELL personally 0. MONSELL to me known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. he executed the same. Notary Public Notary Public CHNOSNe Tit =' CHA &Ikyollk.1,11 (410ee.t*5 STATIN OF NOW YORK. COMM OF 111 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF 6t1PPftK .; i')4 � On the day of 19 before me On the l4 day of 8eteber, I98h, before me personally came personally came GEORGE MONSELL, to me known the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument. with' to be the individual described in and who whom I am personale aaytla rated, Who b"to. ' by tk d�IIX sworn, did depose and say that he resides at N t cr executed the foregoing instrument, and acknow- ledged that he execut¢d the samethat he'knows to in the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; Notary Public that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw execute the same; and that he, said witness, KATHLEEN A. GORµLEy at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. NOTARY PVBLtr,State of Now York No. 11,4688735 QuaUfied in Queens County %n Commission Ermitee Morch 30, 19-k/ amm TX *Mir Detb WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS SECTION TITLE NO. BLOCK MONSELL LOT COUNTY OR TOWN TO ti lY MONSELL Recorded at Request of ctttCAGO TtTLK URAttGL fXaMlAN1t err y • srANCARSFINIusFarw1614KesAaOOfTITLE UAO[aWNtirEAs Rearm by NMI to Distr mleg by it IRVING L. PRICEII JR.t •ESQ. b 828 Front St"Ot 1 ;� P.O. Box E Greenport, New York " 11944 atp. Zip Na tc W t , U W 0 Z_ Q 0 2 G' 0 Q W N 0 O k W tN 6 N H H W WV M1 W AC Sondard N Y it l.l1. jS ., R(MY-20M —Bargain and Sale Ihrd.•-ith Covenants against Grantor'a A,1,—)roti,ld.al or cot po"lion. bingle shr,,) CONSULT YOUR LAWYER 11PORt SIGNINS YNIS INSTRUMENT•TNI!INSTRUMENT SNOULC It USED BY LAWYtRE ONLY THIS INDENTURE, made the Ztit day of April, nineteen hundred and eighty-six BETWEEN BERNARD GELMAN, residing at 83-1 116th St. , Kew Gardens , NY , party of the first part,and THOMAS 0. MONSELL, residing at 525 First St. , Village of I Greenport , Town of Southold, NY 11944 ; party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable considerations paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part,the heirs ar successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, all hi { in erest in s undivided one-half ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows : DISTRICT BEGINNING at the southwest corner of the subdivision "NORWOLD" filed 1000as Map Number 1275 in the Office of the Clerk of Suffolk County, SECTION being the southwest corner of Lot No. 1 thereon; Twp RUNNING THENCE North 89' 14 ' 30" West 375 . 00 feet ; BLOCK RUNNING THENCE Southeasterly 125. 00 feet , more or less; 01 . 00 LOT RUNNING THENCE South 89° 14 ' 30" East, 380 feet , more or less ; 014 . 000 RUNNING 'THENCE North 00 19 ' 30" West , 115 feet to the point or place Of BEGINNING. BEING the parcel of land shown on said map entitled "Jessie Baldwin to George Monsell", and being one acre, more or less . g;} r TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the firstppaart in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; T06ETHER'with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns Of the party of the second part forever. 'it, 4 AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will appl the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the satrn o any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indentpre so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed This deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: - ;, l rTt BE ARD GELMAN 1 a STATE Of NEW YORK, COUNTY Ot' QVQ� � EEt STATS 00 NEW YORK. COUNTY Or SEI On the �Lq ill day of April , 19 $6 , before me On the day of 19 , before me personally came BERNARD GELMAN personally came to nu• known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who... executed the foregoing instrltment, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. executed the same. STATE OF NEW ireps . COUNTY op" sat STATE OF NEW YORE, COUNTY OP SSt On theday of s%% t_ 19,fj�, before me On the day of 19 before me personally 4nie personally came rM, to me known, who, being by. me duly sworn, diddepose and the subscribing witness to the forelsoittg -instrumedt, rith t . say that he resides at No. whom I am personally btkd, who, by '`ddfy sworn,did depose and Say that he resideaat o. that he is the of that he'knows the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he to be the Individual knows the seal of said ,corporation; that the seal affixed described in and who executed the foregoing instturtent; to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw affixed by order of the board of directorsof said corpora- execute the same;and that he,said winless, tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. WrrH COvaNAieT ACAINET CIRANt ass Acts STICTION i TITLE NO. Rt.UCK BERNARD GELMAN Lor COUNTY OR TOWN TO Recorded at Request of THOMAS 0. MONSELL CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY r■i.+r.Riw�wir.eN..w VAOOARO FORM OF SEO YARN 00M40 OF it FIE UNOEaBRITER4 Distributed by WICKHAM, WICKHAM fi BRESSLER, i' . tom. ftfIPMM' ' 4741110tri' Will, MAIN ROAD �.O BOX 1424 MATTITUCX, NY > 140-11452 t i ,.i . U O Z O K U W K 0 W N K s U s N N_ y 7 K W K t �� A-ntond.rd N,r.n T.P. Foran Pn01• If-P --n.".ln.n n.lo nrrd Ith Co..... t• .Inrt"r� r AM—Indl.Idod or Cnrporaloo. (doN. IlCONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIONIMO THIS INSTRUMENT—THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BI USED BY LAWYERS O._ U3c J489PAA49 THIS INDF21TUM made the 30th day of November , nineteen hundred 1. and eighty-three BETWEEN TAMES_ I , MONSELL, residing at 5U9 First Street, Greenpor: New York, TIIOMAS O. MONSELL, residing at 525 First Street, Greenpor: New York, and GEORGE MONSELL, residing at 518 'Beach 139th Street, Rockaway Park, New York 11694 , as next of kin of AMY P. MONSELL, deceased, who died on November 18, 1978 (Suffolk County 917 A 1978) party of the first part, and THOMAS O. MONSELL, residing at 525 First Street, Greenport, New York, - party of the second part, VMWE83ETH,that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece orppaarcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in tkocx Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known as Lots 49 to 54 inclusive, on a certain map entitled, "Map of NOrwold" , and filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on 3/13/39 as Map No. 1275. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE part of the same premises conveyed to the grantors herein by deeds described in Liber 2194, cp. 36 and Liber 4582, cp. 80 recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk' s Office. SUBJECT TO Covenants and Restrictions recorded in Liber 3009, cp. 298 . SUBJECT TO Right of Way recorded in Liber 1961, cp. 575. SUBJECT TO Telephone Agreement recorded in Liber 2058 , cp. 463. RECEIVED ELL.A*RAWER AL ESTAjEE N 5, / 9fy TAkj X UFFOLKOUNTY TAX MAP t DESIGNATION Dm, 1000 TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and See. 138.00 and lall ltile restate and the vrights described Ile premises of theefirst tpart in and oer lines f saiTOGETHER emises; TOhthe appurtenances HAVE AND TO HOLD the pile second herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigus of Illi 01.00 the party of the second part forever. 1_.t(0:13.001 S i AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything .• g0, whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. 7� y. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right o receive su�considof - eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the r the same first to the payment of the cost of the Im P� of paying the cost of the improvement and will a any other purpose, improvement before using any part of the total of the same for Ifl0/0 The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture to requires, IN W]TNFSS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first shore written, IN PRESENCE oP: ' 7494 , `I y cquNTr qs Suffolk aa. STATE Of NEW roue,couNrr oa Suffolk On the 0 day of Diovc:mbe� 83 9 before me On the 9d day of November 19 83, beforr rite 3personally came personally came THOMAS O. MONSELL James I . Mo nsell to me known to be the individual described in and who to Me,kno" to be the individual described in and " k'R 4xecuted the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing Instrument, and acknoaledgrd t1t R tte executed the same. a executed the same• Uf • 1 2 Notary Public N tftry Public MARY JANE INNWO _; . Notary lob g New York Notiry Phu . 1grr. Bl`. No. Guls"ad M igt+ GuallN.d ht `�p Commieaioh EttrFrea FAdtrdt " r.mmisslen 7WA.y aTATE of New YORK, COUNTY OF sat STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF - ••r 19 before me On the day of 19 , before Tie On she day of personally came personally came to me known, who. being by me duly sworn, did depose and the subscribing witness to thuainted triiho bei ingint by ik Wy say that he resides at No. whom I am persgnxlf scq sworn, did depose andysiy that he resides at No. that he is the that he knows ' of the corporation described to be the individual in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he ted { foregoing insttuesent; . knows the Beal of said corporation; that the seal affixed described in and who Oucu to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subscribin* wltness, was present and sari :!fixed by order of the board of directors of said ra- execute the saltae; End Sial he, said witness, tion, and that he signed h name thereto by likea order. at the same time subscribed fi name.ts witness thereto." STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF , ,SUFFOLK ' On the 3 0 day of November, 1983, before me personally came George_Monsell, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. g N Gu A otary Publi ^nmmissien g 8y 0* *dist vab SECTION WtIH COVENANT AGAINST GRAN IOR'S ACTS BLOCK TITLE b is LOT COUNTY.OR TOWN MONSRLL TAX aILUNC AOOSRat TO NON88LL nscoNM At 11aQWM of TM Title Guarantee camp". turuta BY MAIL TO: Irving L.arcaaaasreawerwar .a�brmuuwwawu*nu F law/ Jrreet ew York 11944 Zip Na AIWMCDMPMY W it 0 h� �L 10 y 110A 4 K CONSULT YOUR LAWYSR BEFORE SHO HO THIS INSTRUMENT—THIS INSTRUMENT`U1.0 B USED BY LAWYERS ONL Ian Ij LIBER 6099 PAGE 306 et —• � ! THIS INDENTURE, made the G day of January , nineteen hundred and sixty-sev,:n <;• BETWEEN HARRY M. MONSELL, residing at Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, party of the first part, and THOMAS O. MONSELL, residing at 47 Orchard Street, Lindenhurst, Town of Babylon, Suffolk County, New York, party of the second part, WITNESSETH,that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land with the buildings and-improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being hcxhet near the Ham1ef of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, known and designated as lots nos. 7, 8, 9 and 48 as shown on map entitled "Map of Norwold" surveyed by Otto W. Van Tuyl, on January 25th, 1939 and filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's office on March 13, 1939 as map No. 1275. SUBJECT to covenants, easements and restrictions of record. SUBJECT to zoning regulations and ordinances of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. f.. yI TOGETIIER with All right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and N roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO' t I o+ HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of,the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of , the party of the second part forever. BP AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered aqj hi y; whereby the said prMnises have leen encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the Ix}tty of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the pari;; If the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid. eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the sameto the payment of b. any otherr purpose. a cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for pu The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: LI(<tR UIJf�Y 'k'A6E t�!'/ STATE of Naw YORK. COUNTY of Suffolk su !TAT! Of NEW YORK, COUNTY Of On the i et 19 before me day of January, 1967 , before me On the day of personally came personally came HARRY M. MONSELL, to me known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described l and who . executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledges that ` he executed the same, executed the same. i. P '.r .. �o.G.7 !TATE Of NNW-YOM COUNTY Of sRt STATE of NEW YORK. COUNTY Of sRl On the day of 19 before me On the day of 19 be lore me personally came personally came to me known,wits, being by nie duly sworn, did depose and the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrumrnr h say that he tes#des atNo• whom I am,personau, acquainted, ,who being by In sworn,did dost Envoy that he rend;-at No. that he is the that he knows Of the corporation described to be the individual in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that thy: sear affixed described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that •he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw afted by order of the board of directors of said corpora- execute the same; and that he, said witness, tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed h name as witness thetetw• }ftENAntt�.'ftit Hurt) SECTION WITH COVNT AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS BLOCK I ITLS No. t LOT HARRY M. MONSELL COUNTY OR TOWN TO THOMAS O. MONSELL Recorded At Request TM Guarantee CapuT 7 RETURN BY MAIL TOi srRRa.m IoaA Of:Nl!R 1DaB lolNro op rnu ItRwRmb M+►r. iVleMann.& �oti�tttt THE TmE " ME MAMMA": Attorneys ati Law 288 Main Street Zip Na ONA RrRRiO4 iM New YORK Green ty . Y. 6 z. W 0 JAN 18 W7 SUN NOWN E. KLIPP NVr 1961 N W 1 rl 1•Y S4(6/65)St.nderr v,v,n.T.U.Poem 8 .ra.la and 9ele Deed,alG Coreoul,yala.t Craator' —ladhldul a ttCsrp�e ellei(81y�i aRw CONSULT YOUR LAWYER REFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT— _ t�t- THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD 1E USED 1Y LAWYERS ONLY. THIS INDENTURE, made the / 7 day of October , nineteen hundred and sixty-five 19MEEN J01111 htOrISELL, rosiding at 514 First Street, Village of Greenport, '.Gown of Southold , County of Suffolk and State of New York t party of the first part, and THOMAS 0. MONSELL, residing at 47 Orchard Street, Lindenhurst , Town of Bnbylon, County of Suffolk and State of New York, t party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable con- sideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of Ih second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, ppiece or parcel of land fla"�; gu� situate, lying and being ltttttR[ near the Village of Cuteho ' T �Fi7 County of Suffolk and State of New York, known as Lot No. 47 on a certain Afap entitled "NORWOLD" filed in the Office' of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on March 13, 1939, as Map No. 1275. BEING AND INTENDED to be the same premises conveyed to the Party of the first part by Deed from HARRY MONSELL, dated the 18th day of February, 1959 and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on the 20th day of February, 1959 in Liber 4590 of Conveyances page 359. � I I i �! TOGETHER with an right, tide and interest, if any, of the party of the first part Its and to an streets ' and roads abutting the above described premises to the anter lines thereof; TOGETHER with the44 appurtmances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; v` TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heir or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered any. this[ whereby the said ppremises have been encumbered in any way whatever, AN the party of thea fint part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Uen except as aforesaid. of the first part will rewire the consideration for this conveyance and will hold'the�h to receive conslderatfar as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the oat of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose, The requires word "Party" shall he construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so 1`1 1-rW above written.WITNESS abtriWHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first Iso f sEn rca or: JOIAMOEillSELL t L1EfRJ PAGl146 STATE OF.NEW YORK, COVNMOF Suffolk sm STATE OF NEW YORK: ODUWY OF sst On the 14_day of Oc tober 1965 before we On the day of 19 ,before so personally came 'paraonaAy came John Monsell Ito we knoe►Rt o4v! the:Individual a * ,, � . ! U fa tlte. 1 0011141. tees" : G'T"«.n F>a...nwrdao,trfi7 r • r STATE Of fes".MM COUWYOF ss 8VAwor N VN W f tt the day of 19 ,before an Onrsonallycame the day of 19 ,be"slpe' mpr =khaynveybeingbY me duly sworn,diddepose and the subs&r*g wimps to dw 1 he' at n. whom I swamp did�ay that he resider that he is the that he knows Of the corporation described to be the In sod Web executed the fore0og instrument i that he ka mo the ses! of old corporation; that the seal affixed described in and who executed tM foll a imilkii0*1f t, to mdd;Wr#mvft is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said sube ti�tt ; of0mv6& order of dre board orporsComm- ex caNl>s�h nano a hrea Ni tk+n, that ba signed h mmne theerrew order. at the same ttram sn Vft Covortset Agabut 'Grantor's Acts cruor Aoe. - T.G. LOT 'fs,'ffa. � � txtutert�oa io"of Southold JOHN MONSELL TO TFC O. .MONSELL >asntMlAtlNpw.E kat-mm rmstvmmmv aw Writs"Cases," ets;t+mtet Dtt tram to sraarsussOwo► ioaserrmsamrirxfau GYMPANTY A9a+Ft1 met Mai xla, "d10-1MUGS6COMPANY 21lfl matmc Stmei60 (iries11pC7dts Lll. s-,N.Y. cNauttetp aty etNEW YM'. zk fie. M RECORDED JAN12 1 9Bl Suffolk Ka P r N 12 , C+andvd N Y N r t co. i,xnpr.Le,.. It ,pvn, d�Je Ueal,ud,Govmmu a n ,Gramm ,A R �ividu J m Corpoonun(Single Sheer) .r CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT—THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS OWT ^,I LIBER60W FA61306 -•-e�. THIS INDEN7URF, made the day of January nineteen hundred and sixty-seven *; BETWEEN """RY 1VI. MONSELL, residing at Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, i party of the first part, and THOMAS O. MONSELL, residing at 47 Orchard Street, Linderilutrst. Town of Babylon, Suffolk County, New York, party of the second part, WITNESSETH,that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the l+aTty of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heir- or successors and assigns of the patty of the second part forever, AL1, that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected sit; lying and being int% near the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, known and designated as lots nos. 7, 8, 9 and 48 as sho5v1) on map entitled "Map of Norwold" surveyed by Otto W. Van Tuyl, on ,January 25th, 1939 and filed in b:-ie Suffolk County Clerk's office on March 13, 1939 as map No. 12.75. SUIMP](:'T to covenants, easements and restrictions of record. SUBJECT to zoning regulations and ordinances of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. k j I' *rl) TOGETUER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the nl,rrve described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenagtts ! ! s a' and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO tp. HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs'or successors and assigns of "r ' the party of the second part forever. AND the party, of the first part covenants that the party of the first Whereby the said gm•mi.ses have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesairt has not done d. AND anything AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien law, covenants that the party o the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such considf- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires, IN WrrNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above J f written. IN PRESENCtF. OF: 3 , t.l x + i'. 1, LIBERM wtW71, STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF Rn rrol.k as: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF $at `Cr On the `' day of Jarma.ry, 196i before me On the day of 19 before me fI personally came personally came AI:71Y NL NIONSP:LL, to me known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same, executed the tame. n STATE OF N11W YORK, COUNTY OF se: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF est On the day of 19 before me On the day of 19 before me personalty came personally came to me known, who, being by me duty sworn, did depose and the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrumenti with say that he resides at No. whom I am personally acquainted, who, *ng by mit-duly, sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No, 1 that he is.the of that he knows the corporation described to be the individual in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seat, of said corporation; that the seal affixed described in and who executed the foregoing instrument=i f to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subscribing 'witness, was present and saws affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- execute the same; and that he, said witness,. tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto, ,i" '4 jwp to glob *alt Dctb SECTION WI IIJ COVENANT A(;Ali ISI I IILt A('Is ' BLOCK TITLE No. LOT HARRY M. MONSELL COUNTY OF. TOWN 1'O THOMAS O. MONSELL I! � ry 1 e} (� I J '- Recorded At Request of The 'Title Guarantee Company {'.!J J;,,i / 6,/ ,t RETURN 3Y MAIL TO: 75�IalI kMFI�l+�e.eaw arurosao rostra ar eRw"M some or mei'.blab'"wwIltsDkw*Wa by nl THE TITLE ;CUARANTFE COMPANY t• nn Attoorr neys at ;Law c N.s wrrReDiul;(rGr Mai# Stt'eef I ' Zi N ' IN NeWYORK _[• Y. � �y®A Greenport, ry P o._tel I, .R y LL � ' o tP ,. o RECORDED J JAN 12 1967 o I E. KUPP CYdI d'Suffolk Qmq 1961 S r w • W iA� ....�•�7 .2 rfftt !f! fPPif i!p�{ � �°6i•i� : 0 i 'iii !PPfi ° . ••um ° „e • f •p u,..ov •pn ,,,r .' Y �� uo• • F V°- Tn m X30 2 � ♦ L� F +e a K f9 �i D ; 9 N n T O Q m n 0 I 'c 1 Z O p I - ••w S •.n.. T i � ((i 3 d ,I. I � i '� ' Rp►mR�i �iYr�3C tR fc C,l�lte is,{� �fF�i TM t 'FF et MA 7C III11 l pp ". sa -z ii I II ° �•; E T F M S t• d O . F ° 7 ¢ uS \ d" C6 ��• S' t' s I', _ I I i ' ,n p s •� �w, ppyy � P F i 4 � • ' '£, a � r.• t ,r F. nT' O d `pa �• � = 9 , , p O � ♦.�'. ud91 .w" ^ 4� X apes= t ' ` • III 1.+° `•''a ' - t.. " i' p • ° p sA " ro e c ,r a 3 - � f- •5 - O e.0 Z v Sep i {4 5 p { � $ ••y • ' 6• x c: iLLL h <,Sr n - +p fFa .. :.. ^AMY e IMu p �' •-' Op _ -o �•• ,• Su�rjc.. _• MS 363 5 CTF No. X.a� CERTIFICATE OF AB NnnNnrauT THOMAS 0. MONSELL, residing at 525 First Street, Greenport, New York 11944, JAMES I . MONSELL, residing at 509 First Street, Greenport, New York 11944, GEORGE MONSELL, residing at 518 Beach 139th Street, Rockaway, New York 11694, and BERNARD GELMAN, residing at 83-19 116th Street, Kew Gardens, New York 11418, for the purpose of abandoning and cancelling that portion of Monsell Lane, a private road, and Lots 1 to 9 inclusive and Lots 47 to 54 inclusive, on the subdivision of a certain tract of land owned by them and hereinafter described, pursuant to Subdivision 3 of Section 335 of the Real Pl:oPe ty Law of the State of New York, do hereby certify: 1 . That a certain map subdividing such tract of land in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, into lots, plots, blocks or sites, entitled "Map of Norwold" was filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on March 13 , 1939 as Map Number 1275 . 2 . That more than twenty years have elapsed since the filing of said map. 3 . That the tract of land owned by the undersigned, identified as Lots 1 to 9 inclusive, and Lots 47 to 54 inclusive,, and Monsell Lane '(a private road) in front of said lots, a portion of the subdivision, which is to be abandoned 12 7 8 2 #ABS. Nos FILED �. L-t 13 1995 D FILED JUL 0 / IN5 JUL 7 19955 SOUXOLD TOWN Li) //:040 ,r PLANNING BOARD EWM P FOIAW __ CM OF>RATf>LK OOUlRY and cancelled, is situate in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated as part of Monsell Lane, Lots 1 to 9 inclusive, and Lots 47 to 54 inclusive on a certain map entitled "Map of Norwold" and filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on March 13 , 1939 as Map Number 1275. 4 . That the said mentioned portion of the street is neither open, nor a public highway, nor used by the public, nor necessary for the use of the owners, occupants or any other persons having an interest in any part of the said subdivision of lands shown on said map. That the said THOMAS O. MONSELL, JAMES I . MONSELL, GEORGE MONSELL and BERNARD GELMAN, are the owners of the said tract of land described in paragraph 3 hereof; the portion of the subdivision of the tract and the said portion of the street ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AND CANCELLED, and, effective with the due approval and recording hereof, shall no longer exist . 5 . Endorsed hereon is the approval by the Assessor of the said Town of Southold. 6. Submitted herewith is an abstract of the title of the said tract of land, the subdivision of which is to be abandoned covering at least twenty years last past, and a certificate to the effect that there are no unpaid tax liens against the said lands, and to be approved by the County Clerk of Suffolk County at the .time of recording hereof. -2- 7 . Attached herewith is a portion of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicated by hatched lines the portion of Monsell Lane to be abandoned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate is made and executed in Suffolk County, New York this day of 1993 . THOMAS O. MONSELL ES I . MO SELL GEORGE M SELL AERNARD GELMAN STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss . : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) On this day of 1995, before me personally came THOMAS O. MONSELL, to me known and known to me, to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Certificate, and he duly acknowledged to me that he executed the same. N ary Public of maw Yb* No.4831:"S, ufk* Oonwnhtkn Expim t 31.1 -3- 0 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss . : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) On this day of 199., before me personally came JAMES I . MONSELL, to me known and known to me, to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Certificate, and he duly acknowledged to me that he executed the same. ary Public STATE OF NEW YORK ) JANET E.STAPLES Notary Public,State of Now Ytoyrk ) ss . : Commialonf�6; aJuN 81,1 765 COUNTY OF QUEENS ) On this day of 1995 before me personally came GEORGE MONSELL, to me known and known to me, to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Certificate, and he duly acknowledged to me that he executed the same. N a r y Public No.�191 0 SSufoMcIn "4%vVblk STATE OF NEW YORK ) Clara w Ju 31. ) ss . : COUNTY OF QUEENS ) On this day of 114` 1995" before me personally came BERNARD GEL , to me known and known to me, to be the person described in and who executed -4- the foregoing Certificate, and he duly ackowledged to that he executed the same. IRA P LISOrOOSKY � Notary Public, Sraie of Naw York No. 30-4529414 Qualified m rc N-�•szu Couy V Commission Expire- r Z. I-. .� Notary Pu lic ENDORSEMENT OF APprtnvar I, the undersigned, the Assessor of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, do hereby approve the foregoing Certificate of Abandonment . Dated: to 199 IPA P.LISOrr'P�KV ? Notary Public, Stir,or�N?w vn•rt No.30-4(;23414 Qualified in N.,sau County Commission ExpireslIbi 1, ll.-4(;;6 _ -5- • SW6Jr10Es- 106 °•`"°�` CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT � New Suffolk Rodd, PO Box 930, Cutohogue, NY 11935 Telephone (616) 734-6907 • Fax (616) 734-7079 February 14, 1993 Mr- Richard G. Ward Chairman Southold Town Planning Rd. Town Hall Southold, M.Y. 11971 Ref; Thaaas Mousell Dear Mr. Ward, Reference the above properties, it is the opinion of this board that a new fire well be placed as marked by an R on the enclosed drawings, The Fire Well is to conform to our specifications and be equipped as follows; 1, 20 H.P., 3 Phase, Submersible pump capable to deliver 400 GPM at 10 PSI discharge at center of tee at top of well. pump shall be of submersible turbine type, equipped with grease packed beat*002 in bowl assemblies. The bowls shall be of a smooth finish design to guide the water from one stage to the next with a minimus of turbulence. Is, A standard shallow well will be permitted if feet to water is 1S feet or less and can yeild 400 GPM. 2. Top of the well is to be finished off with an ON z 4" well seal. 4" galvanised tee and plug, and 4" x 4-1/2" solid brass ferrule and cap. The hose threads and hydrant wrench nut shall conform to the standards of the Cutchogue Fire District. 3• Resonant rights granted to the Cutchogue Fire District. If you have any questions, Please advise. Very truly yours, 914 A141-4 Mathew J. Martin Secretary sum/enol. D a � ,W":, j NNING BOA11 , .j acv `'�^•yC. !�^.+• I � .. _ 70 , cri 75 4~` _ ^ Ir . 7 I i �� JJft Off, --- --" 140, o o o 5.�. — --- `f r i 1 , ON --- 40;000 ` IOt t d t, I_ f s�TBA c 4 X to - j . . ..._.. . COO, PLANNING PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS °p Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman p SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. t Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 P.O. Box Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards 179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 19 Y3 Mathew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Martin: Enclosed please find (2) surveys y� —S LTM /000 — ! 38' — / --? . le y'. / � l3 . / . Please notify this office as to whether any fire wells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by / O ,1993. Thank cooperation. you for your Very truly yours, RECE�im Richard G. Ward `ty, Chairman enc. .lNj 2 9 I Cute02us Fire � FO(,�c ti�� OGS C= PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS w Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS O George Ritchie Latham, Jr. y'�JD `: �O� Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516)765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516).765-1823 19 Y3 Mathew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Lane Cutchogue, New York 119.35 Dear Mr. Martin: Enclosed please find ( 2) surveys S C–T- /L/ /oo o - / 3 7 / .� I F. 2. l . /? , / Please notify this office as to whether any fire wells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by cooperation. / O ,1993. Thank you for your Very truly yours, �r L.4',e A 1� Richard G. Ward Chairman enc. � 1 TO: File FROM: Melissa Spiro, Planner RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision Thomas Monsell SCTM# 1000-138-1-2.1, 9.1 & 1000-138-1-13.1 & 14 DATE: January 27, 1993 At the request of Mr. Monsell, a copy of the proposed subdivision map was forwarded to the Cutchogue Fire District for a recommendation as to whether a fire well was needed. Usually the Planning Board refers the proposed map to the Fire District upon receipt of sketch approval. However, Mr. Monsell would like to know the total expense required to subdivide the property. Therefore he would like to know whether or not the Planning Board will be requiring a fire well. h�o��gUFFO(,�COG y o= t PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman " (+g SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kennethh L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 �_ 19 Mathew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Martin: Enclosed please find ( 2) surveys S T M Please notify this office as to whether any fire wells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by / O ,1993, Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, . OR A 11410 ? Richard G. Ward Chairman enc. �gUFFO�,� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o y. H 2 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 5 SCOTT Supervisor eHARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward a0 Town Hall, 53095 P.O. Box Main Road Mark S. McDonald r Kenneth L. Edwards 179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Marie Ongioni March 17, 1992 218 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision Thomas Monsell SCTM# 1000-138-1-2.1,9.1 & 1000-138-1-13.1 &14 Dear Ms. Ongioni: The following resolution was .adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on March 16, 1992: WHEREAS the Planning Board has reviewed the Environmental Assessment Form and the reports received in response to the lead agency coordination; and WHEREAS additional information has been requested to assist the Planning Board in their review of the significance of this action; BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning request the information as listed in the March 2, 1992 report from Charles J. Voorhis and the February 6, 1992 report from the Zoning Board of Appeals. In regard to Number 7 of the report from Mr. Voorhis, the Board will be requiring that final maps contain a valid stamp of Health Department approval. Upon submission of the above mentioned information, the Board will proceed with the SEgR review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Ver trulyyo Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Encl. cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals ,Q CRAMER, V Hl, OCIATES pryell ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS u\ Mr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. March 2, 1992 Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road D - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 f Re: Thomas Monsell SCTM# 1000-138-1-2.1, 9.1, 13.1 & 14 — Dear Benny: PtNN6110 RD As per the your request,we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with our correspondence of October 11, 1990. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. Overall, this parcel is moderately sensitive due to the presence of wetlands associated with Mud Creek on the east side of the proposed lots. The environmental attributes of the site are further discussed as follows: The site contains three soil types including: tidal marsh (Tm) in the are of wetlands; Plymouth loamy sand (8-15%slopes) on the east side of the site adjacent wetlands; and, Haven loam (2-6%slopes) on the west side of the site. The tidal marsh soils are constrained and will be avoided under the proposed subdivision. The Plymouth loamy sand (8-15% slopes) is primarily in the area within 75' of the wetlands, and development must be properly designed and controlled in order to avoid disturbance of erodible soils in these slope areas which could cause impact to adjacent wetlands. The Haven loam is in the less steep portions of the site and is not expected to cause significant constraints. The topography of the site decreases from west to east, and there are several undulations with moderate slope. There are no intermittent streams identified on site in the soil survey; however, site features could be described as very subtle swales which decrease in elevation toward the wetlands. The topographic information presented on the survey is from the Suffolk County Topo maps and provides 5' contour intervals with insufficient accuracy to allow for effective review. On site topographic contours in a 2'interval would assist in detennining the existinggrades and location of swales. In addition, a covenanted natural buffer (with the excepfien of wood Pagel of 3 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 110mas Monsell f.00g EAF Review chipped foot trails) of at least 50 feet should be provided between the edge of lot clearireconstruction and the wetlands A 75 foot buffer would be preferable and would remove the development from the area o jurisdiction of the Town Trustees If any activity is contemplated within 75 feet of wetlands, a Trustees permit is required It is also advisable to establish a line of hay bales at the downslope limit of clearing during construction in order to avoid sedimentation to the wit=buffer area This can be ensured through building inspector review of site construction. The upland portions of the site are established in dry oak forest habitat with a fairly thick canopy which reduces light penetration and therefore limits understory except along a trail through the site and on the western site boundary. The uplands offer habitat to small mammals and birds. Expected avian species include: swallow-like birds, tree-clinlin birds (woodpeckers, nuthatches, etc.); and, perching birds (warblers, cardinals, sparrows, etc.). None of the species expected in this habitat would be threatened or endangered. The wetlands comprises a small percentage of the east side of the site, and would be considered a High Marsh, dominated by Spartina patens. The edge of wetlands identified on the map should be labeled 'edge of wetlands as delineated by the Town TiusteesApril 28, 1991"if this is the wetland location determined by the Trustees Additional shorebirds including Ion*-legged waders, duck- like birds andDdl-like birds may have association with the site in this area. The osprey(NYS')`hreatened Species) may be associated with the surface water areas of the Creek for feeding and roosting purposes; however, to significant contact with the subject site is expected. The site is located in Groundwater Management Zone VI and based upon the Suffolk County Topo maps, the 10' contour bisects the building envelop of Lots 1 and 2. A more accurate topographic map would allow for an evaluation of the impact of siting of sanitary systems. It is recommended that sanitary systems be located above the 10' contour. The proposed 40,000 square foot lot size is adequate for compliance with Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, in order to reduce potential groundwater contamination. In terms of water supply, the site is in an area not serviced by public water, therefore, private wells must be installed. The area is downgradient of agricultural land, and is identified as a area impacted by Nitrate and Aldicarb contamination in the North Fork Water Supply Plan. Adequate potable water supply must be obtained or treatment provided In addition, the applicant should demonstrate that wells and sanitary systems can be situated on the site in a manner which provides adequate leaching depth as well as a 150 foot separation between well and sanitary system and the NYSDECrequired 100'setback from wetlands for sanitary leaching pools. The proposed project is compatible with surrounding land use and zoning. One issue of note has to do with access to the property. Monsell Road is the only means of accessing the site. Monsell Road is a dirt road within a 25' right-of-way. Consideration should be given to the future of Monsell Road if additional subdivision of land which requires this access is authorized. The road transects the headwaters of Mud Creek by means of an earthen berm at a point just west of Skunk Lane. If Monsell Road is further improved in the future, additional fill and runoff may impact wetlands. The entity responsible for improvement of the road should be determined If improvement is contemplated at this time or in the future, wetland permits shmmm M be CRAMER, VOO\I\S, t£//�1ISOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND'p G CONSULTANTS Page 2 of 3 Thomas Monsell Long EAF Review obtained: and the environmental consequences should be determined and minimized The status of Monsell Road and potential for future improvements of the existing access to the subject parcel should be considered In conclusion, the following recommendations are provided in order to assist the Planning Board in review of this application: 1) On site topographic contours in a 2'interval would assist in determining the existing grades and location of swales. 2) A covenanted natural buffer (with the exception of wood chipped foot trails) of at least 50 feet should be provided between the edge of lot clearing/construction and the wetlands. The covenanted buffer should be reflected on the map. 3) Any activity contemplated within 75 feet of wetlands will require a permit from the Town Trustees. This should be stated on the subdivision map. 4) The subdivision map should state that "a line of hay bales will be established at the downslope limit of clearing during construction of each individual lot ". 5) The edge of wetlands identified on the map should be labeled "edge of wetlands as delineated by the Town Trustees April 28, 1991"if this is the wetland location determined by the Trustees. 6) It is recommended that sanitary systems be located above the 10' contour. the applicant should demonstrate that wells and sanitary systems can be situated on the site in a manner which provides adequate leaching depth as well as a 150 foot separation between well and sanitary system and the NYSDEC required 100' setback from wetlands for sanitary leaching pools. 7) Adequate potable water supply must be obtained or treatment provided. 8 The status of Monsell Road and potential for future improvements of the existing access to the subject parcel should be considered. I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to continue review of this project. If a revised map addressing the above recommendations is submitted,we would be pleased to review same at your request. If the above points are addressed to the satisfaction of the Board, I believe that a negative declaration could be issued,utilizing the revisions and points discussed in this review as a basis for the determination. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very tru :orhis, s, — arles J. CEP,AtCp enc: Part I/II LEAF \\\\ /7 . CRAMER, VOORHt$ 8'.44 SOCIATES ENVIRONMENTALL:AND;7h }NG CONSULTANTS page 3 o[3 � ,(\ T 11f oil. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS pip >d HA S < SCOTT L. yl> I Gerard P.Goehringer,Chairman Supervisor Charles Grigonis,Jr. y Z Sere Doyen,Jr. g y Town Hall,53095 Main Road James Dinizio,Jr. 4''+r a �� P.O.Boz 1179 Robert A. Villa �1 '; ��� Southold,New York 11971 Telephone(516)765-1809 Fax(516)765-1823 Telephone(516)765-1800 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Southold Town Planning Board (Attn: Melissa Spiro) FROM: Board of Appeals D [ 6 [ p d L DATE: February 6, 1992 SUBJECT: Thomas Monsell Minor Subdivision at Cutchogue SOUTHOLD TOWN pLC.NNING B0AR0 This letter is in response to your coordination letter of February 4, 1992 and to confirm that we have no objection to your assuming lead agency status. At this time, however, we feel it is important to furnish the following as part of the record for your information and consideration in evaluating this project: SOIL: Slopes 8-15 percent. Due to rapid permeability of the soil, a possible pollution hazard exists to Mud Creek from septic system leachate. A sediment and erosion control plan should be developed and approved to address potential soil erosion problems which could occur during development of the site. WETLANDS: There is a moderate limitation of the site for lawns and landscaping due to the sandy surface layer of Plymouth soils. There should be buffer strips established on the steep slopes and parallel to the wetland. Practices should be installed to control any increase of storm water surface runoff due to development. TOPOGRAPHY: The site has short steep slopes along the eastern side adjoining Mud Creek and the wetlands. In addition, there are two natural drainageways across the site which slope from west to east. Consideration should be given by the owner and the lead agency to limit the amount of disturbance which could occur on the site and maintain as much of the existing woodland as possible. • �1 Ci�fPn CRAMER, Y IATES P(? 3 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Mr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. March 2, 1992 Chairman Southold Pannin Board Town Hall, 5309 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 D Re: Thomas Monsell SCl'M#E 1000-138-1-2.1, 9.1, 13.1 & 14 Dear Benny: I As per the your request,we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with our correspondence of October 11, 1990. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part 11 LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. Overall,this parcel is moderately sensitive due to the presence of wetlands associated with Mud Creek on the east side of the proposed lots. The environmental attributes of the site are further discussed as follows: The site contains three soil types including: tidal marsh (Tm) in the are of wetlands; Plymouth loamy sand(8-15%slope:) on the east side of the site adient wetlands; and,iVained nloam(2-6%slopes)on the west side of the site. The tial marsh soils are conssad will be avoidethe proposed subdivision The Plymouth loam (8-15%slopes)is pin the area within 75'of the wetlandsanddeventmustbepr rly designed and controlled in order to avoid disturbance oersoils inthese slopeeaswhich could causewetlands.The loam is in the less steep portions of thesito cause siconstraints. The topography of the site decreases from west to east, and there are several undulations wrath moderate slope. There are intermittent streams identified on site in the soil survey; however, site features could be described as very subtle swales which decrease in elevation toward the wetlands The topographic information presented on the survey is Ecom the Suffolk County Togo maps and provides 5' contour intervals with insufficient acxvracy to allow for effective renew. On site topographic contours in a 2'interval would assist in determining the exietirtg and location of swales In addition, a covenmtted natural bu(jer(with the exceptwn of wood Paso 1 of 3 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 loom"Mansell Lmg EAF Review SEE= ot trials)of at least SO feet should be provided between the edge lotion and the wetlands A 75 foot buffer would be and would e development from the area�f lwisdicflort of the Town � If mrywithin n feet%w� 8 a Tncste+es m&is>rquirif It is also to est aline lhuanyy bales at the doslopptt limitn le Eder to avoiEsedonentation to the wetltatds buf�er aha Third a be rough buildrrtg inspector review of site constnuxiEs. The upland portions of the site are established in dry oak forest habitat with a fairly thick which reduces light penetration and therefore limits understory except along a tr�through the site and on the western site b�ndar�. The uplands offer habitat to small mammals a birds. F�peected avian species include: swallow-like birds, tree-c ' birds(woodpeckers,mithatches, etc); and,perchu�q birds (warblers, sparrows, etc.). None of the species expected in this habitat would be threatened or endangered. The wetlands comprises a small percentage of the east side of the site, and would be considered a High Marsh, dominated b�+ Spartina patens. The eulgoe of wetlands ident#led on the map should be labeled edge o wetlands as delineated by the Town Trustees April 28, 1991 if this is the wetland locatiofn determined by the Trustees. Additional shorebirds including lon*-le ed waders, duck- like birds and gull-like birds may have association with the site m this area. The osprey (NYS'threatened Species)may be associated with the surface water areas of the Creek for feeding and roosting purposes; however, to significant contact with the subject site is expected. The site is located in Groundwater Management Zone VI and based upon the Suffolk County Topo maps, the 10' contour bisects the building envelop of Lots 1 and 2. A more accurate topographic map would allow for an evaluation of the impact of siting of sanitary systems. It u recommended that sanitary systerus be located above the 10' contour. The proposed 40,000 square foot lot size is adequate for compliance with Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, in order to reduce potential groundwater contamination. In terms of water supply,the site is in an area not serviced by public water, therefore, private wells must be installed. The area is downgradient of agricultural land, and is identified as a area impacted by Nitrate and Aldicarb contamination in the North Fork Water Su ly Plan. AdNuate potable natersupply must be obtained or treatment provided Ina wn, the applicant should demonstrate that wells and sara my systems can be situated on the site in a manner which provides adequate lead de well as a ISO foot separation between well and sanitary system and the NYSDE required 100'setback from wetlands for sanitary leaching pools. The proposed pproject is compatible with surrounding land use and zoning. One issue of note has to do with access to the property. Monsell Road is the only means of accessing the site. Monsell Road is a dirt road within a 25'right-of-way. Consideration should be given to the future of Monsell Road-if additional subdivision of land which requires this access is authorized. The road transects the headwaters of Mud Creek by means of an earthen berm at a point just west of Skunk Lane. If Monsell Road is further improved in the future, additional fill and runoff may impact wetlands. The entity responsiblefor improvement o the road should be determined If improvement is contemplated at this time or in the figure, wetland permits should be CRAMER, V OCIATES Page 2 ot3 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS I%*="Monett L006 BAF RevIew obtaiW and the environmental conte9uarces should be determined and minimized: Die status of Mansell Road and potential for fuswe onprovemaets of the cau tq access to the subject pard should be considered • • ,e In condusion, the following recommendations are provided in order to assist the Planning Board is review of this application: 1) On site contours in a 2' interval would assist in determining the existing location of swales. 2) A covenanted natural buffer(with the exception of wood Bopped foot trails) of at least 50 feet should be provided between the edge of lot deanng/construction and the wetlands. The covenanted buffer should be reflected on the map. 3) Arty activity coatennplated within 75 feet of wetlands wr71 requue a permit from the Town Trustees Thu should be stated on the subdivision map 4) The subdivision map should state that"a line of hay bales wiIl be established at the downside limit of Bearing during construction of each individual lot". 5) The edge of wetlands identified oa the map should be labeled"edge of wetlands as delineated by Bre Ta�va Trustees Aprr7 28, 1991"if this is the wetland location determined by the Trustees. 6) It is recommended that sanitary systems be located above the 10' contour. the applicant should demonstrate that wells and sanitarysystems can be situated on the site in a manner which provides adequate leachinapth as well as a 150 foot separation between well and sanitary system and the NYYSDEC required 100' setback from wetlands for sanitary leaching pools. 7 Adequate potable water supply must be obtained or treatment provided. 8 The status of Monsell Road and potential for future improvements of the existing access to the subject parcel should be considered. I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to continue review Of this pproject. If a revised map addressing the above recommendations is submitted,we would be pleased to review same at your request. If the above points are addressed to the satisfaction of the Board, I believe that a negative declaration could be issued,utilizing the revisions and points discussed in this review as a basis for the determination. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very tr yo , es J. rhis,CMEP, I;CP enc: Part I/II LEAF CRAMER, VCOATES Paae3or3 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS 1416-2 (2/87)-7c 4 66 617.21 SEQ r Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a proje• or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequen ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determir significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environment- analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectii the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatio process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or actio, Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic proje. data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provid_ guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentialh, large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not th impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 13 Part 1 C ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the infomation, and considering ser ng both the agitudeand importance of each ation recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and impaif ctr�Psreason reasonably detelrmined bysupporting lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions THOMAS MONSELL MINOR SUBDIVISION Name of Action SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD 765-1938 Name of Lead Agency —.Bennett Orlowski Jr Chairman Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer i 5ignature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency ig nature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) nr+r amhr+r 4 1 g1W .. Date 1 %ART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consi• as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addit information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not in- new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and sp each instance. NAME OF ACTION ~ R MI LOCATION OF ACTION(...elude Street Aooress,Municipality and County) - Monsell Lane Cutcho ue , N. Y. Suffolk Co . Lots 1-6 & 49-5% in Yap of Nordd fil NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR as _ Thomas MORsell BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS ( ) First Street CITYIPO Green ort , STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF OWNER(If different) N. Y. 11944 BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS ( ) CITYIPO STA7E 21P CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivide parcel into three 40, 000 sq , foot lots . l Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ;_]Rural (non-fa Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 3 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER MPLETIO! Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) - — acres _ acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) _ •OQ acres acres Water Surface Area --r acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) �— acres --- —_ acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces �— acres acres Other (Indicate type) �— acres T--�__ acres ---�_ acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on ? -- a project site. acres T.v�e /yj9J z� / yirL• � ,� .. a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained —SL % of site ❑Moderately well drained A2 o. ❑Poorly drained % of site - - % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified Aft soil of 1 thf the N`IV " o Land Classification System? �_ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Dyes ONO a. What is depth to bedrock? "7 199'0+ _(in feet) 2 5. approximate percentane of pll glosed {( .rte with <lupc<: f70-111"6 ❑to 15Y6 _ L71596 or greater % 6. Iseproject substantially continuous to, or contain rr huilding, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑yes [�No •. Is projoct substantially l Uo ii;llUll< 10 ,l sit, lilted un the Renister of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes ONO 8. What is the depth of the water table? 4+ (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? XXes 4M 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ENYes ONO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes CXNo According to P . R .ANDERSON , ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) byes ONO Describe Wetlands 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes 1XNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes (ENO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Mud Creek to CutChoque Harbor a. Name of Stream and name ul River to which it is tributary Mud Creek to CutChoque Harbor 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Meadow unnamed b. Size (In acres) • 09 ac 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Dyes tlNO Ca) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Dyes ONO NA b) If Yes, will improvements he necessary to allow connection? Dyes ONO NA 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes X.1No 19. Is the site located in or suhstantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Artich 11 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? PYes ONO Tidal Wetlands 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes qNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor -1 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 3 acres initially; 3 e. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. acres ultimately. d. Length of project, in miles: NA '(If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed NA %. L Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 proposed 8 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour A (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 3 Ultimately 14 I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 3-0_' height; -1—'LQ-L- width; 100 ' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 420 ft, 3 r_ ' 4 2. How much natural mate] l (i.e., roffiarth, etc.) will be remove(] from the site? 0 tons/cubic,yards, 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? MYes ONO ❑N/A a. If yes, for what inten&c: purpose is the site being reclaimed? Scenic yards b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I%IYes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? PYes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? S acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes KNO 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 10 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated NA (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). C. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONO 6. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes PNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 30 after project is complete 5 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Oyes CXNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Oyes TNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged _ 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? LRYes ONO Type Sewage - Hou h01 d 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes 1(7No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? HIYes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? X]Yes ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month 1 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Oyes ONO Landfill c. If yes; give name Town landfill ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes PiNO e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Ayes �N0 NO 504040 a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? A _ tons/month. ( /! // IW/f37ilf'Q/t,ay6,= b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? Mp"t years. r 0/Y C#Ar 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes INNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per clay)? Dyes KlNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes CONo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Pyes ONo If yes , indicate type(s) __ Flectric heat-oil or gas 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 30 gallons minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallons/clay. 24. Does project involve Local, State or I ederal funding? Dyes bNo If Yes, explain 4 X5. Approvals Required: 4 Submittal ` Type Dale City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes NNo !� City, Town, Village Planninr, Board [) Yes ❑No Subdivision Approval Concurrent City, Town-Zoning Board ❑Yes ®No City, County Health Department UYes ❑No " " o Other Local Agencies Dyes [�No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes qNo State Agencies IXYes ❑No —NYS DEC ? Federal Agencies ❑Yes WNo C. Zoning and Planning Information - 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? IX1Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: []zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit 93subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other _ 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 3 1 -acre lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? R-40 S. What is the maximum potential develooment of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 3 1 -acre lots C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ( Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/. mile radius of proposed action? Residential 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/. mile? IIYes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimurn lot size proposed? 40 , 000 s q . f t . 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes KINo 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? NYes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? gYes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes PNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. LApplicant/Sponsor Name Philip Anderson Pres Anderson Env . Inc Date 1 -17-1991 Signature Title Environmental Consultant-Planner If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 h � 2—PROWT IMPACTS AND T1( .R MAG&UDE Responsihilily of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form thereviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts an() wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 'I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 'i. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impd(:t as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. if a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the prof4,j tj+te? Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 001\10pQY 0 ES • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise p�err 100 ❑ foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed ❑ Dyes ❑No 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ 3 feet. El Yes ❑No • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. [) • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑Yes DNo 3 feet of existing ground surface. [� ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more 0 [] than one phase or stage. Oyes ❑No • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove move than 1,000 [1 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. ❑ Dyes ❑No • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ • Construction in a designated floodway. D Dyes DNo • Other impacts e!�ISS>l UeGJIaW AI1/ � . �2� El Ll ❑1'es ❑No r / It D XIS ❑No 2. Will there be an effect tr. ,.,,y un,que or unusual land forms found on _ the site?O,e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc 0 OYES • Specific land forms: Tidal t•IPtlarld$ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No It 6 ' 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact B 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate targe Mitigated By (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conner t' n Law, ECL) Impact Impact Project Cham �!O OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ 1-1 Yes ON, • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [3 N, protected stream. : \ • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes 1:1 N, • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 13 N. 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existtq&/or new body of water? NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON- or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Ne • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? groundwater quality OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ 13 Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0N supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 13 No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to naturai conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ,Cl Yes 0N and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage ❑No facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or s r' ce water runoff? X3NOYES Examples that would apply to column 2 / • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 7 Small to Potential Can Impact 'Be Moderate Large Mitigated By _ Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. K • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ OYes ONO • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ El Yes ONO ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO ` IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 KNO OYES • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips any given hour. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ONO refuse per hour. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 ills. ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.hour or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. ❑ ❑ • Other impacts: ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS S. Will Proposed Action affect any threaitened or end species? g red Examples that would apply to column 2 NO OYES ' Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list,,using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ❑ C3' Removal of an C3 Yes ONO Y portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ' Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twi ❑ ❑Yes ONO ce a year, other ❑ than for agricultural purposes. ❑ ❑ Other impacts: 13 Yes ONO ❑ ❑ E3 Yes ONO Will Proposed Action substantially affect non•threat n d or non-endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 O OYES I Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish'or wildlife species. ❑ ❑ Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑Yes ❑No Of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important ❑ ❑ vegetation. ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land r so rtes? Examples that would apply to column 2 ✓ � O OYES The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural 0I Land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) ❑ Oyes ❑No l_ 8 i "0 - 3l Can Impact BeMitigated ByProject Change• Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile ofagricultural land. ❑Yes ❑No• The Proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acresof agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more ❑Yes ❑Nothan 2.5 acres of agricultural land.• The proposed action_would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, ❑Yes ❑No strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause i farm field to drain Poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURC )et 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? O OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum inion 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether 13 11 ❑Yes ONO man-made or natural. Proposed land ect • aesthetic resources ewh ch will leliminate por srignificantly reducer rtheir ts visible to uses of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes. CNO enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure f istoric, pre- historic or paleontological importance? Examples that would apply to column 2 NO AYES • Proposed Action occurring contiguous partiallyor substantially guou to any fac lity or site li ted on theSta e1 or National Register ❑ of historic places. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ' ONO e IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to columnP2 • The Permanent foreclosure of a future recreational 0 OYES • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. LO ❑ ❑ • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑Yes ONO 9 IMPACT f N TRANSPORTATION 1 2 •3 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation sy, t ms? Moderate l to Potential Can Impact.Be Examples that wo6ld apply LargeMitigated nBy g PP Y to column 2 O DYES Impact Impact Project Change • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [[:]No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's souscas of fuel or energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 O DYES • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. - ❑ ❑ • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑Yes - ONO transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family ❑ residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibe io of the Proposed Action? Examples that would apply to column 2 ) as a result NO DYES • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. ❑ ❑ ' Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑Yes ONO noise screen. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO ' Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and saf yr Examples that would apply to column 2Actionion or NO ❑YES e Proposed se a risk of sub to ce(i.e. oill,pest pesticides, chemicals, radiation,on, etc.s In the of hazardous accident or upset conditions, or there may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO discharge or emission. Y be a chronic low level Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ Form ^-= (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating ❑ r infectious, etc.) ❑Yes ONO I Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. ❑ ❑ Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ s ❑Yes ONO within 2.000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ❑ waste. Oyes ONO Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ONO I 10 .. . . .. .. .. .._. IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 1 2 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact B 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the ext.s�n community? Moderate Large Mitigated By /ANO DYES Impact Impact Project Chant' Examples that would apply to column 2 ; \ • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%, C1 ❑Yes ❑N • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. ❑ ❑Yes ON, • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. El ❑Yes ❑Nc • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ C1 ❑Yes ❑Nc or areas of historic importance to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc • Development will create a demand for additional community services El(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. C1 ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ Dyes No ❑ C1 []No❑ ❑Yes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controverw related to potential adverse environmental impacts? 10 DYES If ct o If YOU Cannot Determineithe Magntude of Impact, Proceed oaPartr3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be mitigated. potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to.a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O� - ,< ` '^ Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. � �if � :� ��N-; Richard G. Ward 1 "� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 25, 1992 Marie Ongioni 218 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Minor Subdivision Thomas Monsell SCTM#1000-128-1-2. 1, 9. 1, 13. 1 & 14 Dear Ms. Ongioni: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 24, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this Type 1 action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, aw ' ,'"5 Bennett Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, Board of Trustees Southold Town Board Robert DeLuca, SC Dept. of Health Services Roger Evans, NYS-DEC - Stony Brook Thomas Jorling, NYSDEC - Albany X- • o��gUFFO(,�co PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS resin Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman p 47SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward 'd�( Mark S. McDonald F'- � a Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUT 4OLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 19, 1992 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Thomas Monsell SCTM#1000-138-1-2. 1,13.1 &14 Dear Messrs. Cramer and Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on February 3, 1992. The $400.00 review fee was submiBoardtted willbbethe assumingcant on Lead Agencyuary status, 192.at9The Planning the February 24th public meeting. If all is in order, the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the March 16th public meeting. Please submit your report no later than March 9th in order for the Board to review your report before the meeting date. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Ver truly yo rs, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman �I^S Encls. TRUSTEES ,,• w� John M.Bredemeyer,II1,President c - d'+ < SUPERVISOR Henry P. Smith Vice President "' SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J.Krupski,Jr. A John L.Bednoski,Jr. �fll `J� Town Hall John B.Tuthill 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Planning Board - FROM: Board of Trustees ` �d RE: Thomas Monsell uj SCTM #1000-138-1-2.1, 9.1,13.1,14 DATE: December 6, 1991 Enclosed please find the report of Bruce Anderson Consultant dated as revised November 12, 1991. The Board reviewed and approved this report on December 5, 1991. enc. JMB:jmt DEC - 9 1991 �y. Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant To: John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees From: Bruce Anderson TOWN OF SOUTr7OLD Environmental Consultant Date: April 30, 1991 Revised: November , 12 , 1991 Re: Environmental Review - Subdivision Thomas Monsell Situate Monsell Lane w/o Skunk Lane Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-138-1-2.1,9.1,13. 1 ,14 Subject parcel contains three acres and is located in an R-40 Zoning District. The applicant proposes to subdivide the three acre parcel into three lots. The parcel overlooks Mud Creek which is a contains extensive tidal wetlands. The mud creek wetland systems is comprised of a narrow creek which begins at is northern extent close to the juncture of Monsell Lane and Skunk Lane. The wetland is dominated by the low marsh cordgrass , Spartina alterniflora. The high marsh areas are dominated by spartina patens , marsh elder, and groundsel bush. There are scattered patches of phragmites within the high marsh area. The high marsh at the northern extent of the creek is dominated by phragmites. Wetlands contained on subject property were flagged during the April 28, 1991 field inspection. The marsh area within the southern extent of the parcel has been littered with a variety of construction and debris material. Some old tires and have been discarded in this area of the wetlands. A large portion of Mud Creek is evidently managed by the Nature Conservancy. The Conservancy has erected two osprey platforms but no ospreys were observed perched upon either of the platforms. However, a nest appeared to have been constructed on one of the nesting platforms. The osprey has been designated a threatened species by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 The remainder of the parcel is generally characterized as oak woods. The predominant trees found on site are red oak, scarlet oak and white oak. Lands adjacent to and west of the parcel have been cleared and developed. Most of the uplands portion of the site ranges between ten and fifteen feet above sea level. Steep slopes are found immediately adjacent to the high marsh area. The remainder of the upland portion of the site is relatively flat. A barn and a small shed (out-house) are found on the southern extent of the parcel. Various construction demolition debris (most notably, concrete blocks and iron pipe) are found within close proximity to the existing barn. A small open pit with an old inlet pipe leading to it is found roughly sixty five feet east of the barn. The pit , walled with brick, appears to have been at one time a functioning cesspool. It appears that the cesspool has not been used in many years . The following species were identified in the wetlands portion of the site: Low marsh cordgrass Spartina alterniflora Salt meadow grass Spartina patens Marsh elder Iva frutescens Groundsel bush Baccharis halimnifolia Phragmites Phragmites communis Beach grass Ammophila breviligulata The following species were identified in the upland portion of the site: Red oak Quercus rubra Scarlet oak Quercus coccinea White Oak Quercus alba American Beech Fagus grandifolia Gray birch Betula populifolia Red cedar Juniperus virginiana White cedar Thuja occidentalis Flowering dogwood Cornus florida Lowbush blueberry Vaccinium angustifolia Common privet Ligustrum vulgare Greenbrier Smilax rotundifolia Cat brier Smilax glauca Rose Rosa spp. Black berry Rhubus allegheniensis Red raspberry Rhubus idaeus Poison Ivy Rhus radicans Shadbush Amelanchier arborea 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Smooth sumac Rhus glabra Cross vine Bigonia capreolata Squashberry Viburnum edule Recommendations 1-The wetlands as flagged on the property on April 28 , 1991 should be placed upon the subdivision survey. Building envelops should likewise be located on the survey not closer than 75 feet from the edge of wetlands . This should not pose an unreasonable or impractical hardship upon the future homeowners since the property ranges in width between 175 and 280 feet exclusive of the road. In addition the recommended 75 foot buffer is expected to provide for buffering of overland runoff to the wetland after the parcels are developed as well as to mitigate impacts to nesting osprey. 2-The placement of the road along the western property boundary is regarded as a positive environmental design feature. No culverts to the wetlands should be utilized for road drainage. 3-A general cleanup of the area is badly needed. All foreign materials particularly the construction and demolition material deposited in the wetlands should be removed and properly disposed as condition of subdivision approval. 4-The pit located east of the existing barn should be filled with clean sand and the inlet pipe blocked off. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPEC*AC E 1 V E D '9 v 3,9A^1 APPEAL NO. 617 JAN Qf, 1.i ? i9' DATE ...11/1 (9.1..... TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 1, IV ...........THM.AS. MQNS.lb ...................SouthoaLa..v Clerk ..Of ..... zs.t..S.tz.sa.t................................ Name of Appellant Street and Number ..........................Greenport New York HEREBY APPEAL TO ........ . ....... .ipc......................................... ..........Sta . Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO. DATED November 4 , 1991 .................................... . . ................................... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO THOMAS MONSELL ................................................................................. Name of Applicant for permit of 525 First Street Green ort ...................................................P.. New York . ............................................................ Street and Number Municipality State ( ) PERMIT TO USE ( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ( X) Sub—divide property because of insufficient total area on lots 2 and 3 and insufficient width on Lot 3. 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ........Mansell Lane, Cutchogue . .................. .......................................................... Street /Hamlet / Use District on Zoning Mop District 1000 Section 138 Bl ock Ol Lot 21-9.1-13.1-14 THOMAS MONSELL ..................Current Owner Map No. Lot No. Prior Owner THOMAS MONSF'LL 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article IV Section 100. 43 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (please check appropriate box) (X ) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) _ A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has) (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for o special permit ( ) request for a variance andwas mode in Appeal No. ................................Doted ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 (X ) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested for the reason that sub—division application previously filed and pending with Planning Board will not be approved because roadway footage for lots 2 and 3 has been included in total area and each lot has 40,000 sq. ft. and lot lot 3 does not have sufficient width (145 foot vs. 150 foot). Form zB1 (Continue on other side) Ali SWThOLO MAIN 2"(HitlO BOAFO REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION-OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because the total acerage of the 3 lots, and upon which applicant is taxed is 3.10 acres (1.03; 1.07 and 1) but placement of wetland markers by Planning Board consultant has resulted in insufficient total area because road- way footage has been included to achieve 40,000 sq ft. per lot. 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by oil properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because the shortage of total area re- quirements has resulted not from available property which exceeds the required square footage but rather from placement of wetlands markers set by Planning Board consultant. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because each lot would have the required 40,000 sq. foot meeting current code requirements and will in fact be larger than original lots which merged which were significantly smaller (see Map of Norwold, 1/25/39). Property in adjoining sections and blocks are equivalent or smaller in size. STATE OF NEW YORK ) 5s ..r- '""-.� . :..:.= .-c' ................. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) THOMAS ?fONSELLSignature Swor to this .......... '........................... day of.............. November......................... 1991 ................................ ... Y . . ... ............ No ar lic MANN ONGIONI NOTARY Pusuc, state of New York Na. 24•4765191 Ouoffied in nKing$ County Q eomatis$ion Eaptre„ , 5rJ 14-16-2 (2/87)-7c 4 r 617.21 Appendix A SEt State Environmental quality Review �. FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a proj.: or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Freque, ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determi significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environment analysis. In addition,many who have knowledge in one particular ar the question of significance. ea may not be aware of the broader concerns affecti The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinate, process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or actio Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic proje• data, it assists a reviewer in the analysisthat takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provid_ guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentiall• large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not th impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 121 Part 1 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if a ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 te), and any oer information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, is reasonablyopridetermined bysupporting lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.` ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions THOMAS MONSELL MINOR SUBDIVISION Name of Action SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD 755- 1938 Name of Lead Agency —Ren-nett Orlowski Jr Chairman Print or Tyl)e Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer i Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency r�ib_rte_ nature of Prepare. (If different from responsible officer) Date 1 w � ART 1— PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consi as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addi information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not if-, new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and s. each instance. NAME OF ACTION S EL LOCATION OF ACTION(include Street Address,Municipality and County) IMT I NAME OF APPLICANT/ Monsell Lane Cutcho ue , N. Y. Suffolk Co . Lots 17&!Z- =,54 ADDRESS SPONSOR Thomas Monsell BU41NE55 TELEPHONE f ) First Street CITWPO Green ort , STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF OWNER(If tllflerent) )44 BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS ( ) CITY/PO DESCRIPTION OF ACTION STATE ZIP CODE Subdivide parcel into three 40, 000 sq . foot lots . Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other -]Rural (non-fai 2. Total acreage of project area: 3 APPROXIMATE ACREAGE acres. Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Forested - ---3 acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) �— acres '------� acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres� �p - —_ acres acres Water Surface Area � acres �Q Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) �-� acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces �-=-� acres �---=-r--_�� acres acres Other (Indicate type) ��_ acres 3. What is predominant soil t acres �T---��--- acres vpe(s) on project site? T At /+) 7 "------- acres a. Soil drainage: OWell drained � o/e � _� of site ❑Moderately well drained ❑Poorly drained % of site --t-1Z e.•e of site b. If any agricultural land is involved. Ilow many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NN Land Classification System? 4. Are there bedrock outcro Q - acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). ppings on project site? ❑Yes AND a. What is depth to bedrock? 1000+ (in feet) 2 s. Approximate percentan,•of pn pu9rd I ne will) C (7u-ut ❑lot,cf, _%U 15% or greater �� 6. IS'Project of Hissubstantially Registers rnntiGuous to, or contain i building. site, or district, listed on the State or the National toric Places? Dyes C)�No •. Is project substantially 4 onlu:uuus In a site tided on 0141 Rvl:inter of National Natural Landmarks? 8. What is the depth of tile (in feet) e water table? 4+ l_lYcs ONO 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes C�No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? 11. Does C$Yes ONO project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes CXNo According to P. R .ANDERSON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological for 61Yes ONO Describe Wetlands 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes CXNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes WNo 15. Streams within or rontiguous to project area: Mud Creek to Cutcho ue Harbor a. Nance of Stream and name ul River low it is tributary Mud Creek to Cutcho ue Harbor 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas ,vithin or contiguous to project area: a. Name Meadow unnamed 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Oyes 611rrb. Size (In acres) • 09 ac No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ❑Yes ONO NA b) If Yes, will improvernents be necessary to allow Connection? Oyes ONO NA 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes X3No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Arti.:lo !t of lite ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ]Yes ONO Tidal Wetlands 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Oyes QNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: _3_ — -- acres. acres initially; 3 C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres ultimately. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (If aacres. appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed NA I. Number of off-street parking proPosed spaces existing 0 Iosed 8 ''" g. Maxin,unl vehicular trips jwnerated )ler hour _8 •' % h. If residential: Number and lype of housinj, units: (upon completion of project)? Une familyy Multiple Family Two Famil Initially 3 1 Y Condominium Ultimately I. Uimens'uns (in feet) of largest Proposed structure 3� height; -1-9-Q—' -- j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occu width; 1. length. OCCUPY is?. a�n (t. 3 2. How much natural matel,,,I (i.e., rock,'earth, etc.) will be removerltirom the site 0 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ❑No tonsla,bic.yards ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intend(:(: purpose is the site being reclaimed? Scenic yards b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I%lyes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? (lyes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes ❑No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of constnrrtion in months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated NA b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 (number). mond) year, (including demolition). C. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ONO year. d. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes PNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 30 : after project Is COmpIL'[C 5 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes CXNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes a. If yes, indicate t (sewage, c.) a type of waste sews e, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged _ 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [Ryes ONO Type -S 14. Will surface area of an existing water bol ePlaOQ - HOU eh01 d y increase or decrease by prupusal? OYcs Explain XJNo 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 Year flood plain? Ayes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ) )yes ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month I tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ayes ONO Landfi 11 c. If yes, give name .Town landfill ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary Iandiill7 C1 Yes e. If Yes, explain PiN0 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Xjyes ONO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 1 b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 900+ tons/111011th.years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ayes INNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Oyes ((1No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ayes f$INo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ,pyes ONo If yes , indicate type(s) F UCtric� heat-oil r gas 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity _ 30� g.rll( ns , ,inute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallons/day, 24. Does project involve Local, State or federal funding? Oyes If Yes, explain ANO 4 25. Approvals Required: submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board Oyes fXNo CCity, Town, Village Planning Iloard Lyes ❑No Subdivision Approval Concurrent City, Town Zoning Board Dyes ®No City, County Health Department QYes ❑No Other Local Agencies ❑Yes LNo Other Regional Agencies Oyes qNo State Agencies IXYes ❑No —11Y4 fl F(? Federal Agencies ❑Yes QNo C. Zoning and Planning Information _ 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? MYes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit 93subdivision Osite plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-40 3. What is the ma.ximurn potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 3 1 -acre lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? R-40 5. What is the maximum potential develoument of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 3 1 -acre lots C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ( Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land uses) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? 1 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, h4ow many lots are proposed? CbYes ❑No a. What is the mininwrn lot size proposed? 40 , 000 sq . ft. 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services recreation, education, %]No fire protection)? 1�Yes ❑No ( police, a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle Projected demand? qYes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes PNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. cAPPlicant/Sponsor Name Ph i l i D Anderson Pres . Anderson Env . , Inc . Signature �� Dale 1 -17-1991 Title Environmental Consultant-Planner If the action is in the Coastal Arca, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 la '_—PRCI#T IMPACTS AND Tlr .R MAG*UDE Responsil,ilily of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided hY the question: I lave my responses and determinations been reasonablef The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. AnY large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part a. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) - - a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (Column '1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2 It impact will occur but threshold is (ower than example, check column '1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can he mitigated 6y change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be l IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Impact P Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 MNO OYES Any construction on es of 15-L or • foot of length), orwhere ptile general slopes aii tilt' project 15 foot rarea ise per �] Dyes ❑No 10%. • Construction on (and where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. ❑ 0 Dyes ❑No • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within (1 ❑ ❑Yas ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. 0 (] Dyes ❑No • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. ❑ 0 Dyes ❑No • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. I.] ❑Yes ❑No • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. • Construction in a designated floodsvay, F] ❑ ❑Yes ONo • Other impacts 1.7 U 01'es ❑No L] ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect t.,. ...ry ur„que or unusual land forms found on the site?(i,e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc )LXNO • Specific land forms: Tidal WatIandS ❑YES L 0 0 Dyes ❑No 6 60. 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated IE j (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) Impact Impact Project Char y Examples that would apply to column 2 QONO OYES • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material fromchannel of a ❑ ❑Yes ❑� protected stream. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑t. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ` • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑Yes ❑F • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? • Examples that would apply to column 2 ®NO OYES • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. ❑ ❑Yes ON, • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N• ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nr 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ®NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO have approval to serve proposed (project) action. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO do not exist or have inadequate capacity. ❑ 13 Yes ❑No • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ day. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of waver to the extent that there will be an obvious visual ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical Products greater than 1,100 gallons. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. ❑ ❑ MYes ONO • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage iJ ❑Yes ONO facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ Cl CYes 0 N 6. Willro p posed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? Examples that would apply to column 2 )GNO OYES • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 ❑ 1 ❑ ❑Yes ONO 12 Small 3 to Potential Can Impact 'Be Moderate Impact Large Mitigated n • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Impact Project Change • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ON o ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO 1 IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 ®NO DYES • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. ❑ - • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑Yes ONO refuse per hour. ❑ • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 Ills. ❑ ❑Yes ONO heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour or ❑ • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ 13 Yes ONO to industrial use. ❑ • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑Yes ONO development within existing industrial areas. ❑ • Other impacts: ❑ Dyes ❑,yo ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS B. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 QNO DYES �. • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ❑ Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ Oyes ONO ' Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ than for agricultural purposes. ❑ ❑Yes ONO ' Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ONO Will Pro ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO posed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 ®NO DYES i Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish'or wildlife species. ❑ Proposed Action requires the removal ❑ Oyes ONO of mature forest (over 100 of more than 10 ❑ vegetation. Years of a �e acres ; tetation. 6 ) or other locally important ❑ OVes ONO k IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES lyill the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? Examples that would apply to column 2 ®NO DYES the proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural I_ `and (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO L 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be rf Moderate Large Mitigated By �1 Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ction • The of agriculturalal land or, ifdlocatedsinl anoAgncurt ltutalore than District,amore than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. ❑ ❑ Yes ONO • The proposed action_would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ®NO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 posed land or • or in sharp contrast rto current componentsect nt surrroundingland usse patterns, whether ❑ El ❑No man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their ❑ ❑ ❑Yes. ONO enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. C3 E3 ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? Examples that would apply to column 2 ®NO OYES • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO of historic places. ' Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. ❑ ❑ • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for Dyes ONO archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. ❑ ❑ • Other impacts: ❑Yes ❑No ❑ Cl ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ANO OYES ' A major reduction of an open space important to the community. LEI ❑ • Other impacts: Oyes ONO ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ I ❑Yes ONO 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 14. Will there be an effect to existing2 3 transportation systems? Moderate Potential Can Impact Be Examples that would a NO Large Mitigated By pply to column 2 OYES Impact Im act Project Change • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ Oyes ONO ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 qNO OYES • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. ❑ • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑Yes ONO transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family ❑ residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO OYES • Blastfacility. within 11500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. • Odors will occur routine) ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will producerope operating hour per dayn ambient noise levels for noise outside ogstructuresceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON o ' Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑Yes ONO noise screen. ' Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Examples that would apply to column 2 k7NO ❑YES Proposed may se a risk of ion or releasof hazardous ion sub to co(i.te. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation,on, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO discharge or emission. maY be a chronic low level Proposed Action may result in the burial of 'h wastes" in any form (i.c. toxic, poisonous, ❑ highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, ❑ infectious, etc.) ❑Yes ONO Storage facilities for one million ori has or other flammable liquids. more gallons of liquified natural Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No I wast n 2.000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. ❑ � ' ❑ Other impacts: ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER TO 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD tial Can Impact 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? e Mitigated B (ANO ❑yESct Project Chan Examples that would apply to colufnn 2• The permanent population of the city, town or village in which theproject is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. ❑Yes ❑r • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating serviceswill increase by more than-5% per year as a result of this ❑Yes �tv• Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plansporlgoals.• Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑Yes ❑N Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑Yes ❑N or areas of historic importance to the community. ❑Yes ON • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON. • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑Yes ❑N. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N. ❑ ❑ Dyes ON. 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? (gN0 ❑YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—`VALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE- OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be'Potentially large, even if the impacts) may b mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to ' small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRON MENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check hose which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within Essentially undeveloped *'/< mile *1 mile Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed ❑ ❑ 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *'/2 mile 13 Yes ❑No *1 miles E3 Yes No 02 miles 11 Yes No *3 miles '❑Yes ❑No ' Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is ? NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. ` CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged g ged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Activity Holidays Travel to and from work DAY Weekly Weekends Seasonally Involved in recreational activities', ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Y At a residence ❑ ❑ G• vAt worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ 's Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I 2 `.. Z. Flo` PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS n Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, 1r. _ '•, � .yi - �� Supervisor Richard G. Ward -_ �� ' 'i ';��;afVi' Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa, Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 4, 1992 - Marie Ongioni 218 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Minor Subdivision of Thomas Monsell SCTM#1000-138-1-2.1, 9. 1 138-1-13 .1 & 14 Dear Ms. Ongioni: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 3 , 1992. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, start the lead agency coordination process on this Type 1 action. The action has been classified as a Type 1 action as it is located next to a Critical Environmental Area. The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $400.00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of Long Environmental Assessment Forms. The above mentioned sum must be paid in full by your client before we can authorize our consultant to proceed with the review. The check should be made payable to the Town of Southold. When the consultants complete their review, the Planning Board will consider their findings in making a determination of whether the project will have a significant environmental impact. page 2 Thomas Monsell Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, S, J,I71 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. '"rS Chairman - cc: Zoning Board of Appeals P�3 MARIE ONGIONI ATTORNEY AT LAW 218 FRONT STREET, GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 15161 4772048 FAX(516) 477.8919 February 3, 19911 2 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman v Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New Yorx 11971 Re: Subdivision - Thomas Monsell SCTM #1000-338-1-2 . 1.9. 3 , 13 . 1 6 14 Dear Mr. Orlowski and Members of the Board: It is my understanding that the Planning Board has some questions with regard to the configuration of the proposed subdivision. Please be advised as follows: 1. Monsell Lane as it has been reconfigured (turning westward at the end of Lot #10 in the Norwold Subdivision) , is part of this subdivision. 2. The original subdivider, George P. Hummel, filed covenants and restrictions with regard to the Norwold subdivision, a copy of which is enclosed. The C&R's did not retain ownership of Monsell Lane but merely the "right" to make improvements. The road therefore is owned to the mid-point by the land owners on either side which in this case means that Mr. Monsell owns the entire road. According to RPL Sec. 335, such an owner may abandon the roadway and it is our intention to file a certificate of abandonment as part of this subdivision process. A title company has reviewed this matter since receipt of your memo of January 22nd to the Zoning Board of Appeals and has set forth its position in the letter attached hereto. They have found no recorded rights of way over Monsell Lane by any of the original Norwold subdivision owners nor by any other owners. Since the road proceeded to a dead end at the lots now included in this subdivision, and owned by Mr. Monsell, the only portion being abandoned is that portion which would have previously been required by Mr. Monsell to access the most southerly lot. There is no impact on owners at the northerly end of Monsell Lane. ' i I SOLITHOLD T&:^4 PLP.N 4LIG Fir o ,_ I hope the above answers your questions regarding this matter. Please do not hesitate to call me if there is any further data you require. IZMARI:EONGIONA ly yours, i MO/jb enc. cc: Zoning Board of Appeals - ' 1' rl. .,I 14. . r b 1l• rl r .li:l . . . , .. .I i.. ... February 3, 1992 Marie Ongioni,Esq. Re: Title No. S-1062116-SS Front Street P.O. Box 562 Thomas Monsell - Norwold Map P.O Greenport, New York 11944 ATTN: Carmela L. Borrelli, Esq. Dear Carmela: Our investigation of the records of the Clerk of Suffolk discloses that the developer of Map of Norwold, George F. Hummell conveyed premises subject to the following covenants and restrictions as set forth in Liber 2114 Cp 263. These covenants and restrictions are general covenants and restrictions covering the Map of Norwold and are the same as those for other deeds from the developer. In the covenants and restrictions and deeds George H. Hummell did not reserve the fee to the streets. He reserved only the right to make improvements and maintain any streets, etc. as shown on the filed map. Fee title to the streets passed from George F. Hummell to the grantee's set forth on the record. The half street interest to Monsell Lane lies with the present owners of abutting said road as shown on the filed map of "Norwold", filed March 13, 1939 as map number 1275. This certificate is made and accepted with the understanding that the Company's liability hereunder is limited to the period covered above and in no event is the liability to exceed the sum of One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dollars. Very truly yours, Dou4 as Staib Vice President -- ��11 DS:map Enclosure SOUTH1ILu TOWN .. ; pLq;IMI�VG BOARD j !Ir ru•I lv`I In�•/ Jqq• ^,r•.Illltpr 11 llff a ltib ul ' qvgrrY Irl •,nl' ;1llr •• •• r :l.•Ir `n PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ver Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman d ;;i' SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, 1r. Supervisor a` a Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald -_ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman DATE: February 11, 1992 RE: Minor Subdivision Thomas Monsell Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-128-1-2. 1, 9.1, 13 . 1 & 14 Attached is a copy of the map dated July 29, 1991 for the above mentioned subdivision proposal. The Planning Board asked the applicant to show the wetlands as flagged on the property by Bruce Anderson (see Anderson' s report dated November 12, 1991) . Please verify that the wetland line indicated on the survey reflects the location of the flags. S FEB 1 2 1992 TOWND SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: l;a(rnZl�oi �lfQ I�r SUBJECT:' SCTM# : 138 COMMENTS: s�,e-E LAW OFFIcEs MS OF MARIE ONGIONI 218 FRONT STREET P.O. BOX 582 GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 MARK:ONOM" GWMW A L 80RNEW TEL(5 10)477.20" FAX (516)477-li19 vq C.� fM kk&, }t /L. February 10, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Subdivision - Thomas Monsell SCTM #1000-138-1-2. 1. a i 13. 1 & 14 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Please refer to your letter of February 4, 1991. Enclosed herewith please find this Office's client's check in the sum of $400.00 payable to the Town Of Southold to cover the cost of a review of his proposed subdivision by the Board's environmental consultant. I assume that the Board will keep this office apprised of developments and will inform the consultant of our involvement in the event additional data, that we can supply, is required to complete the evaluation. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, MARIE ONQIONI By: � e enc. Carmela L. Borrelli f C/ LS F8 1 2 1992 SOUTHOLD TORN T I PLANNING BOAR. � =�O�OguPFO(�cQGy� 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y Z SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman �i �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �Il Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New Yorrkk 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. W�%S Chairman DATE: February 11, 1992 RE: Minor Subdivision Thomas Monsell Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-128-1-2.1, 9.1, 13 .1 & 14 Attached is a copy of the map dated July 29, 1991 for the above mentioned subdivision proposal. The Planning Board asked the applicant to show the wetlands as flagged on the property by Bruce Anderson (see Anderson's report dated November 12, 1991) . Please verify that the wetland line indicated on the survey reflects the location of the flags. g11FF0(,�c �jS ,/ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS � SCOTT L.HAITRIS Gerard P.Charles Gr gg ni Chairman Supervisor Charles Grigonis,Jr. : Serge Doyen,Jr. p Town Hall,53095 Main Road ames Dinizio,Jr. P.O.Box 1179 JRobert A. Villa ♦�O� * �.�a Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 Telephone(516)765-1809 Telephone(516)765-1800 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Southold Town Planning Board (Attn: Melissa Spiro) R M FROM: Board of Appeals 0 15 V DATE: February 6, 1992 _ F® T SUBJECT: Thomas Monsell Minor Subdivision at Cutchogue S007NOLDTOWN PLANNING BOARD This letter is in response to your coordination letter of February 4, 1992 and to confirm that we have no objection to your assuming lead agency status. At this time, however, we feel it is important to furnish the following as part of the record for your information and consideration in evaluating this project: SOIL: Slopes 8-15 percent. Due to rapid permeability of the soil, a possible pollution hazard exists to Mud Creek from septic system leachate. A sediment and erosion control plan should be developed and approved to address potential soil erosion problems which could occur during development of the site. WETLANDS: There is a moderate limitation of the site for lawns and landscaping due to the sandy surface layer of Plymouth soils. There should be buffer strips established on the steep slopes and parallel to the wetland. Practices should be installed to control any increase of storm water surface runoff due to development. TOPOGRAPHY: The site has short steep slopes along the eastern side adjoining Mud Creek and the wetlands. In addition, there are two natural drainageways across the site which slope from west to east. Consideration should be given by the owner and the lead agency to limit the amount of disturbance which could occur on the site and maintain as much of the existing woodland as possible. MARIE ONGIONI ATTORNEYAT&AW 3/S FRONT STREET.*REENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 ISM 477.0040 PAX t0191477.0919 February 3, 191 L Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. 0. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Subdivision - Thomas Monsell SCTM #1000-138-1-2.1.9. 1, 13 . 1 & 14 Dear Mr. Orlowski and Members of the Board: It is my understanding that the Planning Board has some questions with regard to the configuration of the proposed subdivision. Please be advised as follows: 1. Monsell Lane as it has been reconfigured (turning westward at the and of Lot #10 in the Norwold Subdivision) , is part of this subdivision. 2. The original subdivider, George P. Hummel, filed covenants and restrictions with regard to the Norwold subdivision, a copy of which is enclosed. The C&R's did not retain ownership of Monsell Lane but merely the "right" to make improvements. The road therefore is owned to the mid-point by the land owners on either side which in this case means that Mr. Monsell owns the entire road. According to RPL Sec. 335, such an owner may abandon the roadway and it is our intention to fila a certificate of abandonment as part of this subdivision process. A title company has reviewed this matter since receipt of your memo of January 22nd to the Zoning Board of Appeals and has set forth its position in the letter attached hereto. They have found no recorded rights of way over Monsell Lane by any of the original Norwold subdivision owners nor by any other owners. Since the road proceeded to a dead end at the lots now included in this subdivision, and owned by Mr. Monsell, the only portion being abandoned is that portion which would have previously been required by Mr. Monsell to access the most southerly lot. There is no impact on owners at the northerly end of Monsell Lane. FEB U5 5 1992 SOUTHOLD TOVgN PLANNING BOARD I hope the above answers your questions regarding this matter. Please do not hesitate to call me if there is any further data you require. Ve truly yours, i MARIE ONGION MO/jb enc. cc: Zoning Board of Appeals �� •`=••,.nrifv 'I'ill,� nnrl ( :1 �:n :,F,lc � '„Inf,:rrr ' .y IF (Ld a•n u• A'.r4 un�I'!1 Ih1.. Ip n{/I'Icr•r llr a.l ... nr February 3, 1992 Marie Ongioni,Esq. Re: Title No. S-1062116-SS 218 Front Street Thomas Monsell - Norwold Map P.O. Box 562 Greenport, New York 11944 ATTN: Carmela L. Borrelli, Esq. Dear Carmela: Our investigation of the records of the Clerk of Suffolk discloses that the developer of Map of Norwold, George F. Hummell conveyed premises subject to the following covenants and restrictions as set forth in Liber 2114 Cp 263. These covenants and restrictions are general covenants and restrictions covering the Map of Norwold and are the same as those for other deeds from the developer. In the covenants and restrictions and deeds George H. Rummell did not reserve the fee to the streets. He reserved only the right to make improvements and maintain any streets, etc. as shown on the filed map. Fee title to the streets passed from George F. Hummell to the grantee's set forth on the record. The half street interest to Monsell Lane lies with the present owners of abutting said road as shown on the filed map of "Norwold", filed March 13, 1939 as map number 1275. This certificate is made and accepted with the understanding that the Company's liability hereunder is limited to the period covered above and in no event is the liability to exceed the sum of One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dollars. Very truly yours, tack Dou as Staib Vice President DS:map D Enclosure FEB ' 5 f992 SOUTNOLD TOWN --.,_� PLANNING BOARD ,y Mf 41Fl1 I!(Iill V1'inlll<9INfINlF1Fill C A, °:�v'1.AIu)II ^111. N.ff 1q.- III n,l 11` 11II1r nIII' 1! PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. -`.'?'� -. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald 1(' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road ����%=` Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 4, 1992 Marie Ongioni 218 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Minor Subdivision of Thomas Monsell SCTM#1000-138-1-2. 1, 9.1 138-1-13. 1 & 14 Dear Ms. Ongioni: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 3, 1992. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, start the lead agency coordination process on this Type 1 action. The action has been classified as a Type 1 action as it is located next to a Critical Environmental Area. The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $400.00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of Long Environmental Assessment Forms. The above mentioned sum must be paid in full by your client before we can authorize our consultant to proceed with the review. The check should be made payable to the Town of Southold. When the consultants complete their review, the Planning Board will consider their findings in making a determination of whether the project will have a significant environmental impact. page 2 Thomas Monsell Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, fllS Chairman cc: Zoning Board of Appeals PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O a� .F SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward nl Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 1912 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3 . Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: errlac merxao ll • _SC•TM� 100p -13$- 1- � It q�� 131 61�{ Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: ( X ) Type I 00ceW, Zoo Ce,4> ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: M2112t5jA- 0l20 (516) 765-19 8 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( X ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below) . Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, ��11 mS Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: "Board of Appeals "°Board: of Trustees Southold Town Board °(Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services "NYSDEC - Stony Brook "NYSDEC - Albany LT * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies 14-162 (2)87)-7c 617.21 SEAR ° Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a projeci or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not alwayseasy to answer. Frequent- IV, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition,many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate orohether it is a potentially= large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 13 Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 CUpon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. 'A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions THOMAS MONSELL MINOR SUBDIVISION Name of Action SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD 765-1938 Name of Lead Agency Bennett Orlowski Jr Chairman Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency l Title of Responsible Officer ( Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different From responsible officer) Dpcpmhpr 3 . 1gg0 ` Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION ftepamd by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document Is designed to assist in dettk Mirfrrg whether the action proposed may have a sigrrlficaht-e; on the environrr}ent. pleawt LAtf yrs fa+ettr{ through hswers to these Questions wf}}nom eortsii in part of the ap believe for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Providealtry addW information you believe will be needed to Complete Part 2-and 3. It is expected that completion of theJW1 fAF will be dependent on i0WmatiOn currently 40800k and,wifl not Inv now st6ifies,rm4arch or invest}igticp. If Inf*nRNdion regalrfhg such additional work is una so" e8t:#t>ttstance. ea�andsr = y itxNte.�` btd naa= ra Mons 11 Lane Cutcho ue N. Y. Suffolk ro. Lots 1-6 & 49-54 it p fide NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSORas Thomas Monsell First Street OrTywo Green ort _. STATE MIX CODE NAV*41FOwNEROrarMreml' N. Y. 111944 auatfa�e�r.EPNc - A-DRESS I _- CITYIPO STATE 21P CODE: DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivide parcel into three 40, 000 sq . foot lots . Please Complete Each Question—;IgOkAte N.A. if not applicable A. SHW 4fsSWiptimn Physical setting of overall project, both developed and,undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: OUrban 01ndustrial OCommercial OResidential(suburban) L)Rural (non-fa; MForest OAgriculture 00ther 2. Total,acreage of project area: 3 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland }Mon-agricultural) 3 acres $• 3 ..acres Forested — acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) ---�_ acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 34,25 of ECL) •t1f acres .Q Water Surface Area --� acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) _ acres acres acres — acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces — C� acres aW acres- Other (Indicate type) acres --.--_._ acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Fl@at/bt a. Soil drainage: OWell drained -890)— % of site OModerately well drained / Zp ^o of siteOPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved;how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N' Land Classification System? Q _ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? OYes 0No a. What is depth to bedrock? 1000+ (in feet) 2 T+'� .:�.$.. _R:NeM•ifia.R§r L*].d.,�.0.� &.•re° w.. 5. Approximate percentage of pwpowd I16(tde with slopes: ❑0-10% 010-15% __% UJ 15% or greater % 6. Is'project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building,`site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Oyes CANo � '. Is Project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ONo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 4+ (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes CANo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? 12yes ONo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes LXNo According to P . R .ANDERSON , ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) byes ONo Describe Wetlands 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes CXNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes INNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Mud Creek to Cutchogue Harbor a. Name of Stream and narne of River to which it is tributary Mud Creek to Cutchogue Harbor 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: , a. Name Meadow unnamed b. Size (In acres) , 09 ac 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Oyes 13N0 l a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Oyes ❑No NA b) If Yes, will improvements he necessary to allow connection? Oyes ONo NA 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Oyes KINo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article II of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? PYes ONO Tidal Wetlands 20. Flas the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Oyes QNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 3 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 3 acres initially; 3 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed NA %; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 8 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour R (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One r amily Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 3 -- -- -- Ultimately _ 3 f. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure _ 0' height; 15 0 r width; 100 r length. i. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 420 It. 3 2. How much natural matel,,A'I (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed I`ro'ns the site? _ 0 tons/cubic,yards ,- 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? IAYes ONO ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intendcc' purpose is the site being reclaimed? Scenic yards b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 1111Yes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? IX]Yes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes ONO b. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction in months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated NA (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ❑No S. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes §7No 9. Number of Jobs generated: during construction 30 after project is complete 5 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 -- 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes EXNo If Yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes TNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount. b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? NYes ❑No Type SgWegg_ Hail ql d 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Oyes X]No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? MYes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? VYes ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month 1 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ONO Landfi 11 c. If yesi, give name _Town landfill ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes Flo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? X7Yes ONO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 1 tons/nsonth. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 200+ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ' Dyes [VINO 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per clay)? Dyes l(1No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the Incal ambient noise levels? Dyes IANo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? j(7yes ONO It yes , indicate type(s) Flartric heat-oil or, gas 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 30 gallons/rninute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallons/clay. 24. Does protect-involve Local, State or federal funding? Dyes bNo If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: .� Submittal • Type Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes lXlNo (� City, Town, Village Planning Board NYes 0No Subdivision Approval Concurrent City, Town-Zoning Board Dyes ®No City, County Health Department [;(Yes ❑No " ° ? Other Local Agencies Dyes IMNo Other Regional Agencies Dyes 1�N0 State Agencies IXYes ❑No NYS 11FC ? Federal Agencies Dyes WNo C. Zoning and Planning Information ,y, 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? MYes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: KI ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit KIsubdivislon ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other _ 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 3 1 -acre lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? R-40 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 3 1 -acre lots C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? QYes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a •/4 mile radius of proposed action? Residential 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/ mile? 121yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 3 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 40 , 000 sq . ft . 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes &]No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? CoYes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? gYes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes WNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ( Applicant/Sponsor Name Philip Anderson , Pres . Anderson Env . Inc - Date 1 -17-1991 Signature Title Environmental Consultant-Planner If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 (-'Y—PROJECT IMPACTS AND TI R MAGNITU,4DE Responsibili(y of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been masonablel The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst: Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in:column $:simply asks that it be Looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throt4how the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 'I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact.If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. It impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and.proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 carr be mitigated by changes) in ti,e project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such areduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 { Small to , Potenttal : Can Impact Be ` IMPACT ON LAND Moderate targe Mitigated By 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to tile project site? Impact Impact Project Change MNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No foot of lentift or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑NO 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. Cl ❑ Oyes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within (] [] 3 feet of existing ground surface. Dyes ❑No • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more El than one phase or stage. ❑Yes ❑No • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1000 ❑ ❑ tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. ❑Yes OtVo • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. 1.7 E] []Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there bean effect it. ...ry un,que or unusual land forms found on the site?(i,e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations,etc.)LXNO DYES • Specific land forms: T i da 1 wpt 1 a as 0 ❑ ' Yes ONo 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By (Under Articles 15,24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) Impact Impact Project Chang IMNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ E-1 Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ®NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ C1 Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ®NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not Cl ❑ ❑Yes []No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation czusing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 1:1 No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ 11 Yes [:]No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to naturai conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ []Yes []No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ .17-Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ Cl El Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? XINO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 7 Y y 2 Small to Potential Can impact -Be Metd&Ate Large Mitigated By Impact ItitOW �f Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage ❑ ❑ 0Yes ONO • Proposed Action will allow development in a designateg patterns. ❑ ❑ ©yea ONO • Other impacts: d floodway. ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO O O OYes ONO IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 ®NO AYES • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. O Dyes ONo • Proposed Action will result in the incineration Of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. ❑ O Dyes ONO • Emission rate Of total contaminants will exceed 5 tbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. O O Dyes ONO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial:use. 0 O Dyes ONO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. ❑ O Dyes ONO • Other impacts: O 0 Oyes ONO IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8• Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? / Examples that would apply to column 1N� C OYES i l ' Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ❑ ❑Yes ONO Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ' Application Of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a O ❑ Dyes ONO than for agricultural purposes. year, other O O ' Other impacts: Oyes ONO O O Dyes ONO Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 �1N0 OYES Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. O OYes ONo Proposed ires the of mature foresstn(overu100 years oremoval age) orfo her locally importmore than 10 ant ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? Examples that would apply to column 2 INNO OYES The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural 'and (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Ud0Jye5ONo 8 ' 1 2 3-1 Small to Potential Can Impact Be i Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action_would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm • field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ®NO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes. nNo aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ANO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? - Examples that would apply to column 2 I�NO DYES r The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes QNo • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 r� n IMPACT`01 TRp WORTATION 2 14. Will there 6e an effect to exfstin Small to Petentfat Gan 1 3 g transportation systems? Moderate Lar Pact Be Examples that would a By PPIy to column 2 qNO OYES Impact Imps t Project ha# • Alteration of present patterns of movement of People and/or.goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ Oyes • Other impacts: ❑ ONO Oyes ONO 0 0 Oyes ONO IMPACT ON EMERrxy 15. Will proposed action affect the communitys sources of fuel or energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 11NO OYES • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 596 increase in the use of any forth of energy in the municipality. ❑ ❑ • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ 1 es ONO transmissiortor supply system to serve more than 50 single or twafamily 0 residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. ❑yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will therebe objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result Of the Proposed Action? Examples that would apply to column 2 ANO OYES • ??lasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. ❑ ❑ DYes ONO I • Odors will occur routinely (more than bne hour per day). • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO Ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. ❑Yes ONO Other impacts: ❑ 0 Oyes ONO IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? iL Examples that would apply to column 2 JPNO OYES Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of ❑ ❑ accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level ❑Yes ONO discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" in any 0 �r form 0-e. toxic, Poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, eyes ONO infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑Yes ONO gas or other flammable liquids. ❑ ❑ I Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ y within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous I waste. DYes ONO Other impacts: 10 ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO ' IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 1 2 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Chang= qNO DYES _ Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C3 No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes )]No will increase by more than'5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes F-1 No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ Dyes 1:1 No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? 3NO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or >� If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be'potentially large, even if the impact(s) may b- mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s) 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 • 14.14.11 (2:97)-9c 617.21 SEQR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAl~ Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-1/4 1/4.1/2 1/2.3 9.5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ 4 County road? ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(Le., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes ❑No I - 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ❑No 1 (r N DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *1/4 mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *ih mile Cl Yes ❑No *1 miles 11 Yes ❑No *2 miles El Yes ❑No *3 miles 'n Yes ❑No ' Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ • ❑ ej At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L.HARRIS Supervisor Gerard P.Goehringer,Chairman Charles Grigonis,Jr. ,* Town Hall,53095 Main Road Serge Doyen,Jr. Oy P.O.Box 1179 James Dinizio,Jr. .�r�l ��OSouthold,New York 11971 Robert A.Villa Fax(516)765-1823 Telephone(516)765-1809 Telephone(516)765-1800 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OFSOUT4OLD INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Planning Board Chairman FROM: Jerry Goehringer, ZBA Chairman DATE: January 23 , 1992 SUBJECT: PB Memorandum - Thomas Monsell Minor Subdivision 1000-138-1-2.1, 9.1 & 1000-138-1-13.1 and 14 With referene to the above hearing (advertised for tonight' s ZBA hearing) , we would like to let you know that upon receiving your memorandum today (in which you have indicated that the Planning Board has questions to ask of the applicant/owner in the above pending minor subdivision) , we contacted Marie Ongioni, as attorney/agent, since she was planning to attend the ZBA hearing tonight and did not, as yet, receive a copy of the above PB' s memorandum. Mrs. Ongioni has requested a postponement of the ZBA hearing since additional time is now needed to return to the Planning Board and obtain the necessary documentation to answer questions on the Monsell Lane issues. We are asking that you provide us with documentation concerning the easements at the end of Monsell Lane, the issue of whether an abandonment is proposed by applicant, and any other relevant communications for our file update and permanent recordkeeping (when received from the applicant) . Thank you for your assistance. KTJAN 2 3 192 MNT NG BDOAm PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS h SCOTTL. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. w�/ S , Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald — P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman � � S RE: Appeal No. 4077 Thomas Monsell S/s Monsell Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-138-1-2.1,9.1 & 1000-138-1-13.1 &14 DATE: January 22, 1992 This is in response to your memorandum of coordination which was received on January 13, 1992. We understand that this appeal is scheduled to be heard on January 23, 1992. After reviewing the file and your request for comments, the Planning Board would appreciate it if the hearing was held open pending the conclusion of the Planning Board' s coordinated environmental review. Our comments will follow pursuant to completion of the environmental review, which is slated to begin at our next meeting on February 3, 1992. : We are asking for this because we have several concerns about this property. First, this proposal is a Type I action due to its location next to a Critical Envirionmental Area as designated by the Town Trustees. Second, there are outstanding questions about the elimination and reconfiguration of Monsell Lane which need to be resolved before proceeding further. If there are any questions about this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. cc: Marie Ongioni, Esq. o5001,� M5 ✓ Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. James Dinizio; Jr. Robert A. Villa TO: Planning Board FROM: Board of Appeals DATE: January 6, 1992 SUBJECT: Subdivision Coordination - Thomas Monsell 13 Our File # 4077 Our office has received the above-noted application which is or will be pending before the Planning Board. A request is made at this time under the Subdivision regulations in order that you may be provided with notice to respond within the next sixty (60) days as required by Chapter A106, Sections 106-22 and 106-30. Please communicate those areas which you feel may significantly affect those site plan elements applicable in the new project. Your comments, of course, may be noted by you as "Preliminary" at this early time. Should additional information be necessary, please feel free to stop by our office to review the file or make copies as you deem will be necessary for this preliminary review. Thank you Attachment em � D 13 BARD , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK oK fa G�l��Fes' as ,va�... ... . ._ k CEIVED APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPEC" APPEAL NO. 9 '3oArl 6161 JAN 0 u 1992 DATE ...1 i.�.i...191......... TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. THOMA$ TiSouthl clk ........................ ... ..QNS.F:bL�.....................of ..... .2�a0zser.t..Siz.sst................................ Name of Appeilont Street and Number Greenport New York HEREBY APPEAL TO ...............................................I ... ................................... Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO. November 4 , 1991 DATED ...................................................... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO THOMAS MONSELL ................................................................................. Name of Applicant for permit of 525 First Street Green ort New York .......................................................P.......p...y.................................................. Street and Number Municipality State ( ) PERMIT TO USE ( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ( X) Sub-divide property because of insufficient total area on lots 2 and 3 and insufficient width on Lot 3. Mansell Lane , Cutch08ue 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY .................. ..................................................ict"an'*.......n'*g. ....... Street /Hamlet / Use District on Zoning Mop District 1000 Section 138 Block 01 Lot 2.1-9.1-13.1-14 THOMAS MONSELL ......................................................................Current Owner Map No. Lot No. Prior Owner THOMAS MONSELL 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article 1V Section 100. 43 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (please check appropriate box) (X ) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Low Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has) (hos not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance andwas mode in Appeal No. ................................Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 (X ) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested for the reason that sub-division application previously filed and pending with Planning Board will not be approved because roadway footage for lots 2 and 3 has been included in total area and each lot has 40,000 sq. ft. and lot lot 3 does not have sufficient width (145 foot vs. 150 .foot). Form zst (Continue on other side) Y r JAN 1 3 M ! PIANNING P REASON FOR APPEAL ' Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because the total acerage of the 3 lots, and upon which applicant is taxed is 3.10 acres (1.03; 1.07 and 1) but placement of wetland markers by Planning Board consultant has resulted in insufficient total area because road- way footage has been included to achieve 40,000 sq ft. per lot. 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shored by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because the shortage of total area re- quirements has resulted not from available property which exceeds the required square footage but rather from placement of wetlands markers set by Planning Board consultant. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because each lot would have the required 40,000 sq. foot meeting current code requirements and will in fact be larger than original lots which merged which were significantly smaller (see Map of Norwold, 1/25/39). Property in adjoining sections and blocks are equivalent or smaller in size. STATE OF NEW YORK ) y— ss .. .............. .. ................................. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) THOMAS IONSELLSignature M is ............:................................. day of...............................November...................... 1991 No ary lic MArIr ONGIONI NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Now York No. 24.4765191 Queiiliod in Kinoa County /t Commiuien 6pir //Sp t /qG(•� w mwuJ�mD � � L m p b / ' d a 000"?* P� l es p doo of, 1 J it (` a . a. it M � a 3 _ of !9'001 '3GfiOf68N m � . to r 1S1=N ., � ,- MAP QF EpeOPErZTY t "i SU2VE�'EL_ Fn` �j"t_ � Vf 1 / .V� 1 iV'�\\� ��� r t i{�•� t µ � � ` : r� s f1 AT � g a ♦ X 1! p SCALE `:•�• ' � ' TfIEE,AD.' AR . ACES. ' -�A:dO R _ �:.7b ABOVE iNBTLAND3}-� Y•WIMANO-PLASS AMENDED OCT 25 1990 � ' s NOTES; t cT 1Y S MF 7e't-rpv op 1vORy pt ty." ILEO �'. . , 2." .CO.'T�,X.t�?1A. D�1 asra��r •i -z 1` r i3 r --��____. W-1ZWtC01l1a"zoNp 4Q 4 GQtJTOVit6. F�QM .couaTY Toea MAP. 4E OF Npw � z .. -. • - �`�y odd 7l6M1�� .'.T.r]/K{.}:�}/c V AJJ..���ss�� [AN05V� ..'�TTEQ�4 j{� it .� yy i...fY C Am I Vel`----.--..._.__,_� `lI r ..�. �• DECK loin, C,.wW ln,u�rie.ra•uGa•Yrn� � 4 v o��gUFFD(�co:,� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �, a r? 0 SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. '+ C3 , Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Marie Ongioni December 13 , 1991 218 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Thomas Monsell SCTM# 1000-138-1-2. 1,9.1 & 1000-138-1-13 .1 &14 Dear Ms. Ongioni: Enclosed please find a copy of the report from Bruce Anderson that was revised on November 12, 1991, and approved by the Board of Trustees on December 6, 1991. It is the Planning Board's understanding that you have made an application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for the necessary lot area variances. Therefore, the Planning Board has processed your client' s application fee. The Board awaits a determination from the Zoning Board of Appeals before proceeding with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, , , -otic la , rns Bennett Orlowski, J Chairman encl. 40 PB FiG� TRUSTEES John M.Bredemeyer,III,President SUPERVISOR Henry P. Smith,Vice President SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J.Kropski,Jr. 4WF John L.Bednoski,Jr. Q1 a Town Hall John B.Tuthill 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New Yotk 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Planning Board FROM: Board of Trustees RE: Thomas Monsell SCTM #1000-138-1-2.1,9.1,13.1,14 DATE: December 6, 1991 Enclosed please find the report of Bruce Anderson Consultant dated as revised November 12, 1991. The Board reviewed and approved this report on December 5, 1991. enc. .JMB:jmt � - 91991 Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant To: John Bredemeyer, President DEUTH Southold Board of Trustees From: Bruce Anderson WN OF Environmental Consultant Date: April 30, 1991 Revised: November , 12 , 1991 Re: Environmental Review - Subdivision Thomas Monsell Situate Monsell Lane w/o Skunk Lane Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-138-1-2.1,9. 1, 13. 1, 14 Subject parcel contains three acres and is located in an R-40 Zoning District. The applicant proposes to subdivide the three acre parcel into three lots. The parcel overlooks Mud Creek which is a contains extensive tidal wetlands . The mud creek wetland systems is comprised of a narrow creek which begins at is northern extent close to the juncture of Monsell Lane and Skunk Lane. The wetland is dominated by the low marsh cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora. The high marsh areas are dominated by spartina patens , marsh elder, and groundsel bush. There are scattered patches of phragmites within the high marsh area. The high marsh at the northern extent of the creek is dominated by phragmites. Wetlands contained on subject property were flagged during the April 28 , 1991 field inspection. The marsh area within the southern extent of the parcel has been littered with a variety of construction and debris material. Some old tires and have been discarded in this area of the wetlands. A large portion of Mud Creek is evidently managed by the Nature Conservancy. The Conservancy has erected two osprey platforms but no ospreys were observed perched upon either of the platforms. However, a nest appeared to have been constructed on one of the nesting platforms. The osprey has been designated a threatened species by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 0& The remainder of the parcel is generally characterized as oak woods. The predominant trees found on site are red oak, scarlet oak and white oak. Lands adjacent to and west of the. parcel have been cleared and developed. Most of the uplands portion of the site ranges between ten and fifteen feet above sea level. Steep slopes are found immediately adjacent to the high marsh area. The remainder of the upland portion of the site is relatively flat. A barn and a small shed (out-house) are found on the southern extent of the parcel. Various construction demolition debris (most notably, concrete blocks and iron pipe) are found within close proximity to the existing barn. A small open pit with an old inlet pipe leading to it is found roughly sixty five feet east of the barn. The pit , walled with brick, appears to have been at one time a functioning cesspool. It appears that the cesspool has not been used in many years . The following species were identified in the wetlands portion of the site: Low marsh cordgrass Spartina alterniflora Salt meadow grass Spartina patens Marsh elder Iva frutescens Groundsel bush Baccharis halimnifolia Phragmites Phragmites communis Beach grass Ammophila breviligulata The following species were identified in the upland portion of the site: Red oak Quercus rubra Scarlet oak Quercus coccinea White Oak Quercus alba American Beech Fagus grandifolia Gray birch Betula populifolia Red cedar Juniperus virginiana White cedar Thuja occidentalis Flowering dogwood Cornus florida Lowbush blueberry Vaccinium angustifolia Common privet Ligustrum vulgare Greenbrier Smilax rotundifolia Cat brier Smilax glauca Rose Rosa spp. Black berry Rhubus allegheniensis Red raspberry Rhubus idaeus Poison Ivy Rhus radicans Shadbush Amelanchier arborea 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Smooth sumac Rhus glabra Cross vine Bigonia capreolata Squashberry Viburnum edule Recommendations 1-The wetlands as flagged on the property on April 28, 1991 should be placed upon the subdivision survey. Building envelops should likewise be located on the survey not closer than 75 feet from the edge of wetlands . This should not pose an unreasonable or impractical hardship upon the future homeowners since the property ranges in width between 175 and 280 feet exclusive of the road. In addition the recommended 75 foot buffer is expected to provide for buffering of overland runoff to the wetland after the parcels are developed as well as to mitigate impacts to nesting osprey. 2-The placement of the road along the western property boundary is regarded as a positive environmental design feature. No culverts to the wetlands should be utilized for road drainage. 3-A general cleanup of the area is badly needed. All foreign materials particularly the construction and demolition material deposited in the wetlands should be removed and properly disposed as condition of subdivision approval. 4-The pit located east of the existing barn should be filled with clean sand and the inlet pipe blocked off. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 MARIE ONGIONI �8 ATTORNEY AT LAW 218 FRONT STREET. GREENPORT. NEW YORK 11944 16161 477.2048 FAX 13161 477.8919 August 13, 1991 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road :, _ F •. -' Southold, New York 11791 Re: Thomas Monsell SCTM #1000-138-1-2. 1, 9. 1 and SCTM #1000-138-1-13 . 1 & 14 Dear Mr. Orlowski: In response to your letter of May 10, 1991, I enclose amended maps dated July a9 , 1991 delineating the wetlands and the yield calculations for each lot in the above proposed subdivision. I also enclose a New application fee for these lots in the sum of $2 , 500. 00. Please expedite the processing of this application. Very ly yours /mo /MARIE ONGIONI encs. 5/27l91 Acresslu«y rrnuS4 be -"C(Ujec �fOM to areM , RFs ��sc�sse� 1 Z ppw;il 1.01( C. Cck �o1z a -Few boas un4A -:I- }tem net . 5`'C ,1S Paear1043 MPrC(J"gn -pert DISC, Q10'jaQ 2(R"1 ak I. 4 ` v W - C MARIE ONGIONI5 > ATTORNEY AT LAW 210 FRONT STREET.ORRENPORT. NEW YORK 11944 f9M 477-20" PAX 461{1 4"-"19 August 13, 1991 Southold Town Planning Board ,.��+ k „ Main Road C '"'�-O Southold, New York 11791 a Re: Thomas Monsell SCTM #1000-138-1-2.1,9. 1 and SCTM #1000-138-1-13.1 & 14 Dear Mr. Orlowski: In response to your letter of May 10, 1991, I enclose amended maps dated July a,9 , 1991 delineating the wetlands and the yield calculations for each lot in the above proposed subdivision. I also enclose a New application fee for these lots in the sum of $2,500.00. Please expedite the processing of this application. Very ly yours /mo MARIE ONGIONI encs. AUG 1 3 1991 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS z � �^ SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman e; �,�,'o - Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �� Richard G. Ward 1 - Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 10, 1991 Marie Ongioni 218 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Thomas Monsell SCTM# 1000-138-1-2. 1,9.1 & 1000-138-1-13 .1 &14 Dear Ms. Ongioni: The Planning Board has received a copy of the Board of Trustees' environmental consultant' s report. As indicated in the report, there are wetlands located on the subject property which have not been delineated on the subdivision map. A copy of the report is enclosed for your convenience. It should be noted that the Planning Board has not yet received a formal resolution from the Board of Trustees accepting this report. This letter is in reference only to recommendation Number 1 of the inspection report. The wetland areas have been flagged in the field. They must also be delineated on the map by your surveyor. In addition, the upland and wetland area for each lot must be calculated and indicated on the map. All lots must have an area of 40,000 square feet excluding the wetland area. The subdivision map submitted to the Board shows 3 lots, each exactly 40,000 square feet in area. Because the wetland area was not excluded from the lot area, it is unclear as to if three lots can be designed on this parcel. The application fee for a minor subdivision is determined by the number of lots. As described above, the number of potential lots in this subdivision has not been determined. Thus, the $2,500 application fee submitted for this subdivision was not processed and your client's check is being returned. If your client wishes to proceed with this subdivision, maps delineating the wetland areas and a new application fee must be submitted. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr.AvS Chairman enc. $2,500 check Inspection Report Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant ' To : John Bredemeyer , President Southold Board of Trustees TOWN OF SOUTHOLD From: Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant 0*4 Date: April 30, 1991 Re: Environmental Review - Subdivision Thomas Monsell Situate Monsell Lane w/o Skunk Lane Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-138-1-2. 1 ,9. 1 , 13. 1 , 14 Subject parcel contains three acres and is located in an R-40 Zoning District. The applicant proposes to subdivide the three acre parcel into three lots . The parcel overlooks Mud Creek which is a contains extensive tidal wetlands . The mud creek wetland systems is comprised of a narrow creek which begins at is northern extent close to the juncture of Monsell Lane and Skunk Lane. The wetland is dominated by the low marsh cordgrass , Spartina alterniflora. The high marsh areas are dominated by spartina patens , marsh elder, and groundsel bush. There are scattered patches of phragmites within the high marsh area. The high marsh at the northern extent of the creek is dominated by phragmites . Wetlands contained on subject property were flagged during the April 28 , 1991 field inspection. The creek opens up south of subject property. The shoreline in this area has been largely bulkhead and the creek appears to have been dredged thereby providing for navigation for the boats docked along the shoreline. The marsh area within the southern extent of the parcel has been littered with a variety of construction and debris material. Some old tires and have been discarded in this area of the wetlands . A large portion of Mud Creek is evidently managed by the Nature Conservancy. The Conservancy has erected two osprey platforms but no ospreys were observed perched upon either of the platforms . However , a nest appeared to have been constructed on one of the nesting platforms. The osprey has been designated a threatened species by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 The remainder of the parcel is generally characterized as oak woods . The predominant trees found on site are red oak, scarlet oak and white oak'. Lands adjacent to and west of the parcel have been cleared and developed. Most of the uplands portion of the site ranges between ten and fifteen feet above sea level. Steep slopes are found immediately adjacent to the high marsh area. The remainder of the upland portion of the site is relatively flat. A barn and a small shed (out-house) are found on the southern extent of the parcel . Various construction demolition debris (most notably , concrete blocks and iron pipe) are found within close proximity to the existing barn . A small open pit with an old inlet pipe leading to it is found roughly sixty five feet east of the barn. The pit , walled with brick, appears to have been at one time a functioning cesspool. It appears •that the cesspool has not been used in many years . The following species were identified in the wetlands portion of the site: Low marsh cordgrass Spartina alterniflora Salt meadow grass Spartina patens Marsh elder Iva frutescens Groundsel bush Baccharis halimnifolia Phragmites Phragmites communis Beach grass Ammophila breviligulata The following species were identified in the upland portion of the site: Red oak Quercus rubra Scarlet oak Quercus coccinea White Oak Quercus alba American Beech Fagus grandifolia Gray birch Betula populifolia Red cedar Juniperus virginiana White cedar Thuja occidentalis Flowering dogwood Cornus florida Lowbus'n blueberry Vaccinium angustifolia Common privet Ligustrum vulgare Greenbrier Smilax rotundifolia Cat brier Smilax glauca Rose Rosa spp. Black berry Rhubus allegheniensis Red raspberry Rhubus idaeus Poison Ivy Rhus radicans Shadbush Amelanchier arborea 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Smooth sumac Rhus glabra Cross vine Bigonia capreolata Squashberry Viburnum edule Recommendations 1-The wetlands as flagged on the property on April 28 , 1991 should be placed upon the subdivision survey. Building envelops should likewise be located on the survey not closer than 75 feet from the edge of wetlands . This should not pose an unreasonable or impractical hardship upon the future homeowners since the property ranges in width between 175 and 280 feet exclusive of the road. In addition the recommended 75 foot buffer is expected to provide for , buffering of overland runoff to the wetland after the parcels are developed as well as to mitigate impacts to nesting osprey. 2-The placement of the road along the western property boundary is regarded as a positive environmental design feature. No culverts to the wetlands should be utilized for road drainage. 3-A general cleanup of the area is badly needed. All foreign materials particularly the construction and demolition material deposited in the wetlands should be removed and properly disposed as condition of subdivision approval. 4-The pit located east of the existing barn should be filled with clean sand and the inlet pipe blocked off . 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 THOMAS MONSELL � ' 3 7 1 525 1ST STREET '�/ 19�� GREENPORT, NV 11944-1301 Pay to "Zi 1 orderoF x $ Dollars savimp i � B=k �mla 7:: S .d. N. Wait _ o 625 rndrSu3Jld � 1: 22L4712271:P0 26aat04056 0110 037L Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant X91 To: John Bredemeyer , President A Southold Board of Trustees TOWN OFSOUTHOLD From: Bruce Anderson 1564 Environmental Consultant Date: April 30, 1991 Re: Environmental Review - Subdivision Thomas Monsell Situate Monsell Lane w/o Skunk Lane Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-138-1-2. 1 ,9. 1 , 13. 1 , 14 Subject parcel contains three acres and is located in an R-40 Zoning District. The applicant proposes to subdivide the three acre parcel into three lots . The parcel overlooks Mud Creek which is a contains extensive tidal wetlands . The mud creek wetland systems is comprised of a narrow creek which begins at is northern extent close to the juncture of Mansell Lane and Skunk Lane . The wetland is dominated by the low marsh cordgrass , Spartina alterniflora. The high marsh areas are dominated by spartina patens , marsh elder, and groundsel bush. There are scattered patches of phragmites within the high marsh area. The high marsh at the northern extent of the creek is dominated by phragmites. Wetlands contained on subject property were flagged during the April 28 , 1991 field inspection. The creek opens up south of subject property. The shoreline in this area has been largely bulkhead and the creek appears to have been dredged thereby providing for navigation for the boats docked along the shoreline. The marsh area within the southern extent of the parcel has been littered with a variety of construction and debris material. Some old tires and have been discarded in this area of the wetlands . A large portion of Mud Creek is evidently managed by the Nature Conservancy. The Conservancy has erected two osprey platforms but no ospreys were observed perched upon either of the platforms. However , a nest appeared to have been constructed on one of the nesting platforms. The osprey has been designated a threatened species by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. MN `91991 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 1 The remainder of the parcel is generally characterized as oak woods . The predominant trees found on site are red oak, scarlet oak and white oak. Lands adjacent to and west of the parcel have been cleared and developed. Most of the uplands portion of the site ranges between ten and fifteen feet above sea level. Steep slopes are found immediately adjacent to the high marsh area. The remainder of the upland portion of the site is relatively flat . A barn and a small shed (out-house) are found on the southern extent of the parcel. Various construction demolition debris (most notably , concrete blocks and iron pipe) are found within close proximity to the existing barn. A small open pit with an old inlet pipe leading to it is found roughly sixty five feet east of the barn. The pit , walled with brick, appears to have been at one time a functioning cesspool. It appears that the cesspool has not been used in many years . The following species were identified in the wetlands portion of the site: Low marsh cordgrass Spartina alterniflora Salt meadow grass Spartina patens Marsh elder Iva frutescens Groundsel bush Baccharis halimnifolia Phragmites Phragmites communis Beach grass Ammophila breviligulata The following species were identified in the upland portion of the site: Red oak Quercus rubra Scarlet oak Quercus coccinea White Oak Quercus alba American Beech Fagus grandifolia Gray birch Betula populifolia Red cedar Juniperus virginiana White cedar Thuja occidentalis Flowering dogwood Cornus florida Lowbush blueberry Vaccinium angustifolia Common privet Ligustrum vulgare Greenbrier Smilax rotundifolia Cat brier Smilax glauca Rose Rosa spp. Black berry Rhubus allegheniensis Red raspberry Rhubus idaeus Poison Ivy Rhus radicans Shadbush Amelanchier arborea 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Smooth sumac Rhus glabra Cross vine Bigonia capreolata Squashberry Viburnum edule Recommendations 1-The wetlands as flagged on the property on April 28 , 1991 should be placed upon the subdivision survey. Building envelops should likewise be located on the survey not closer than 75 feet from the edge of wetlands . This should not pose an unreasonable or impractical hardship upon the future homeowners since the property ranges in width between 175 and 280 feet exclusive of the road. In addition the recommended 75 foot buffer is expected to provide for buffering of overland runoff to the wetland after the parcels are developed as well as to mitigate impacts to nesting osprey. 2-The placement of the road along the western property boundary is regarded as a positive environmental design feature. No culverts to the wetlands should be utilized for road drainage. 3-A general cleanup of the area is badly needed. All foreign materials particularly the construction and demolition material deposited in the wetlands should be removed and properly disposed as condition of subdivision approval. 4-The pit located east of the existing barn should be filled with clean sand and the inlet pipe blocked off . 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Bruce Anderson �Gi� Environmental Consultant April 28 , 1991 John Bredemeyer , President R Southold Board of Trustees 6 Q 6 D Town Hall D P. 0. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 C, x`'91 Re: Minor Subdivision - Monsell SCTM# 1000-1-2. 119. 1913. 12 14 TOWN OF SOUTIiOLD Dear Mr. Bredemeyer, Please be advised that tidal wetlands found on the above referenced property have been flagged. I recommend that the wetlands boundary be placed on the survey. Roderick Van Tuyl is the surveyor for this subdivision. You may wish to contact Van Tuyl directly or through the Planning Board to have said line placed upon the survey. The natural resources report on the proposed subdivision will be completed and forwarded to your office shortly. Sincerer 0. Bruce Anderson APR 3 01991 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 gUFFO(,r �ui3GiC.� TRUSTEES John M.Brederneyer,III,President o SUPERVISOR Henry P. Smith,Vice President SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert J.Krupski,Jr. • yr John L.Bednosld,Jr. Town Hall John B.Tuthill �Ol �a0 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 18, 1991 Bruce Anderson 475 Rambler Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Thomas Monsell SCTM #1000-138-1-2.1,9. 1,13 .1, &14 Dear Mr. Anderson: Please note that this office has received the $175.00 fee for proposed consulting work. Please continue your review in this matter and submit same as soon as possible. Thank you. Sincerely, +' John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jmt CC: Planning Board Applicant y Bruce Anderson n Environmental Consultant o U M.AR �1 OLD March 24, 1991 John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall P. 0 . Box 1179 Southold , NY 11971 Re. Thomas Monsell Subdivision SCTM# 1000-138-1-2. 1 , 9. 1 , 13. 1 , & 14 Dear Mr. Bredemeyer, Total expense for environmental services in connection with the above referenced project is estimated at $175.00. This includes field inspection for wetland boundary determination and natural resources inventory and report including impact analysis and recommendations Sincerely, Bruce Anderson 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Su,,cgFiLGS' y.. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Telephone ��, r� y, P.O. Boa 1179 (516) 765-1801 '�� `"` �Jc�. Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Trustees From: Southold Town CAC Dated: March 4, 1991 Re: Planning Board Subdivision of Thomas Monsell SCTM #1000-138-1-2.1, 9.1, 13, 1, E 14 This is a CEA and should be looked at by the Trustees. The wetlands are not defined on the survey but seem to follow the meadow line. The contour lines as shown on the survey may be in question. It also appears that lots 2 and 3 are taking wetland area to make up the square footage required for R40 zoning. cc: Planning Board MAR — 7 1991 1�%I NCIt SUL'St�IV rtC7N �t'fA :� F 2T Y j i �S s ?�'�> .�tw K 'edFw r •., .. h ;: ; .S r.��„�.� -. •yT��' • �J''�J ;j��`tJjjG t S �c ��/�`" }} ����!!„ ?.°3.'xVi7tiTts+v ili'' e < .1..' i��.t �. „i�+• a ' Aft�p ,, � a t: Maw A� l �i.Y (�i1�^.' y _ .� �- v* a'3 1 ( t 'Q++�, a.✓ .. h 4 tip; a� �f , �' aY fr.r svryvlt-Mi- 3°`" '�f:` ,•Mbu r ' '.. T� t �43..h ��' 4,y '. a �' y/ •Ll ( l r > N Y "A S { f.y ,>e�fN'a°-T1•°'S•''> <^ Sa,4i 'sR. Rr `Ya+�£:� > �:: sr .fit ,5 rt.� 1F'xi.. ^i i�* 'f . F '#+Fa,%� s�Y�M1� '. >p�. �. •� . t _T it7. } f v�S # t x e -.. *.,•cN : X'�.' (ak("^ �`r •�. - ":•4' � �A t 3yt ♦ ,y�y �f."�' 'A ^A.F t �, a 'v y.�' y'$s jg t> � :.. � »(�7� ''Sy���`3 j �t r >im L� �u, f .. f t° >"�• •." o .Y 'it � ..3i: r'�-!i T� tW. a y..�r,-�Y�^ •f» '+ s tom+. �<'� ��'�p� R'�6`n' � ;. v'�" 'p y +. ,n Y ,,' '- _:ry MIa •Pf',v- f `�9+.F�i=�v'ai+4lw t" s $ r ♦ 1 'o- fy �t -•tt--.+ .yam: r x ".t�'1" ,i.'.w �)�f �' ♦ `.� n MM r<i.A�"�" v Y t -.T ,i + L' i ,+, •` < k t`.Y•Z.T'"c C I v +..e(pz Y a.. t +• v _ ^"' �' )J"rw'.a f` 4- ' '>F~ ' ; ♦ y>t�� '�' "� d �"4^.t ri. tom.. 1 i t �'C 5s e c y pe e f ." a.#. ,y r-. _ ••> r: a . r ' x iii 4X " r S ,a: -...�.:. � n ... T '� �"" �,..- ice, F mt hw ( '.y ,r '� Y `"A>� ;�,'� �- C` 't;r ••'�, � .e � 'f F1l. tom= � >� 2. "�4^'v _1�•�C s,� q e1 - 2,�i Nw :. r ,ya��.kjt„SF,P��, -f ' ` z :+�.'�• KY F - . .,, , ._''•� F �[� �,"(>2�n: �"h.� e :z"ll11 • ` U \j � ' t �+�yVy >a s: .yam ' .' TTT 0.R' R•Mt,,,.,�. - ro a t y.F'T'..i1w. •a ,li P�� .+ , :;c�'t• . � f4�� � a4�d;'s;��lst�gC � s ..gyp.;. Bruce Anderson su �i Environmental Consultant MS February 8 , 1991 John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hail P. 0. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Thomas Monsell Subdivision SCTM#E 1000-138-1-2.1 ,9. 1 , 13. 1 & 14 Dear Mr. Bredemeyer, As you may be aware, I received a copy of Mr. OrlowskiTs memo to you of January 31 , 1991. In order to provide an estimate for environmental services to your Board including wetlands permit and natural resources report , I require a submitted survey. Upon receipt of the survey, I will furnish your Board with an estimate. Sincerely, :nnderson cc. Melissa Spiro F® 1 31991 k 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 OSV�'F01KCVG PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o I rZn _ tJ+ �;. SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman "O egg Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. !1� Richard G. Ward 1 = �b Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 ' Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: John Bredemeyer, III, President, Board of Trustees FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman.boQ,i,/ U� DATE: January 31, 1991 !J RE: Subdivision Application for Thomas Monsell SCTM# 1000-138-1-2.1, 9. 1, 13. 1 & 14 Attached is a copy of the map dated September 28, 1990, for the above mentioned subdivision proposal. The Planning Board refers this to your Board for review. If wetlands are located on this parcel, please have your consultant contact the surveyor in order that the wetlands be delineated on the map in the most expeditious manner. This is a new application before the Planning Board. It currently has no status since no action other than this referral has occurred. Please contact Melissa Spiro if any additional information is required. cc: John Holzapfel �oc�U�FI�l�L�G� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �Yv �R► Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �o Richard G. Ward � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 31, 1991 Marie Ongioni 218 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Thomas Monsell SCTM$ 1000-138-1-2.1,9.1 & 1000-138-1-13 .1 &14 Dear Ms. Ongioni: The Planning Board has received the application for the above mentioned subdivision proposal. The proposed maps were forwarded to the Board of Trustees for their review. You will be notified when the Planning Board receives their report. Very truly yours, Benn=�lowski�, Chairman (/ M1NPQ S_UgpfV151 :JN - 1 111 L o r" � 9L03 5 0E, i Cap . _ 10 1 70 rn I. 1 ( i 1 !I i �N I at I 3, UL J oil -- - -- - — 1 s j and m I ^ I I Q l' ZO2 '1 �tn I SCALE, 501 111 I ! If/ " f Z j IPfi INE r.EE.2P. 11 j A21:A: 3.0 AcrzEs (Z-76 ABOVE WETLANO'5) I I I C1 I VO.ETLAN______ p_1sLA 65 • � '�� ` , _A_M7=ND_ED OCT. ZS 1490 JULY tT r99t. JULY 29 t99t ? �I o \ .— JAN. 16, 1942 - z6a j y pr I Ji ILrTC.rlOS. QEFE2To "jolo OF ' ;Q?SxIO!r �ILEG��pj, � � .� _n pnrn Pr"3 T?HE SUF,. rara.' _LE2`G G- 1 No.t27 t �P. _ ! D1 I - minm. i —r, —.:� — - — — - ! s, P. ---r* r ' .,� , . .O.Tr�>< r�T` �J,=�_ �= �.,•_x — — F,F GATA CG,� 1�8- I � , 3_PiZEMI5E5 AR IN $a13LG1NG ZQNH 2-40. ur _m „ 4 GONTOUFLS rtZOtvl couNYY -r0 MAPr _ . f' PP W D a P' j SBTSACV..SJ. Q bpi I, r-- Z,tQ,� _ .. } a s1 z � Eta JAN 2 91993 : Y_ NJ , C%Cdtrr; r i - � �.I�• ! � r��� Yr�- u'1e ('li'G. Cr i��� G I . r'41�jKU�C2 �. - - 256�m 1%r - M�/', t_��'�✓ �Jr�•J'EYa•.(ZS .- _ �,.,TEE(`��P��27' ':�."t;� n R (� R ry1 (� � ' FEB 12 1992 D • � - � - ' � � PLANNING HOARD i ll I V 1C 0 s ,;`rr/h.l OF 30 I''' .'w:_.�J P,;•,r. t-4.894030E. IO0,5i 0 f 70 3 _.719 4 1 I ! o I N ! I 40,-000 S.F. � f,m LEY MINP 01 LL o, t h I t J ! AR:E_ A: 3,O All �6 ABOVE w6TLANUW 46,000 s -'. -- .---_-- .E. '� ----------- ii WUTLAXD. JsLAGS. A(v1ENPEP 0CT. 2B f, . G ----- I 1 i z - f--�JULY' 177t9.91.. JAN. 16, 1992 t >a60 1 ra nr:-'t zr-^o _ _ � I10YEJ - f— t M hgmmmymq o M t --SO'--� i- �� n u�rev rniMwaeeaFa L,=T N0S REP,ER Yo PN.RP, 1.YF ' 0r, (G! !. PLED 1 r.- d el ehell t.aRhe mneWern'7 -'�—^�-- o hdttuecePY. N THE SuF"R' WL C-fZl � I E f N L275 a I t'uammmselnalcefed hmeonehrllmi9 L•Y n•', m pare feewh mtSut ry d entl on Ne U.] ,� . } u N f?R.CrY.'1 Ga't,J.NTI 4 U6'Cil, _ ,� � �.�t Ir,.11utmn>or aup., 6.:u e S 75= : f ., V�' ' ZO i ri' * ' VAN -4N �. r � ¢ f O Ml�` Rti tS 25 LANDS. _ ! " ±EB1. 2`1992. l.. r,,,., - .!',i ;,,.' ., „�: d �rwF'-"""'-''---`--''r-6.w--,:'.-.•.;-«w-, , r.—�-T-n,T-`-`t-"T'',-"^--`- �a r,,..-;.v. ., ,. ,. PLANNING flfl T r' JAN 2 21991 1 TH.Qrfi cz ` yrow a 4F 'SOU7 LID Ws- 40 I LL I , Div 1, 11 m f i y q I qq [� - i r } a bi �I>t v1 Ij �. �� , .,1 � - +'•�I�IZ�.F R/.-1Q+T� Sin � !i ` aid k + � � r2, .�'�"" :i- ;.4' 1 tl9� � � _ � � - : . .- . • _ �i•-, � r r' M .� li �; N��Jr,� r�1�%�3" iii' 1 l •F I .A. Ott i k - -� x 1 YI 5 qn v � li I I h oily mi { I Naw SPIS �L, �s - nr d r- i ' ' W fi� _' „ sI o i ' i( Y 'yV•O C�7��ry 1 va 1 n +' ir'Mt r'v.hem th 4rvT t t' „'.I 3, phBhb Y tw h.� 1 I j �', Inn 1 �.. „ ' �. w'},,..- t4 .,� ',' ? {`!_, i,��: r � � '-J�..j . s,.. ..�.. r ,•,Wr . ': .''„ ?..�+ nv va,iy;qP,Q^V'1=Amoh,al�Y n�wW,Oa� ! � ?- - .'�..: ,i,. �, I r, F. -}'r, s � ixe i'. Juni In tit IloN a('eudawhi 3 .^, _ l U Y c, ' Ih �> ',''. / ) ,�-,-„{ �}.i '1`s" A. � '[. ,. •} 3. :k?rs J �a� ;,".I ��i -: ; 1 �s ,' t .r I' .:I fY, .A e,' A 'r �2 �. . �ryr le fw gal ar • "5 S! 1'. tl {.. I ar ,y >I ,r• d:,i4 ..w; - '� 4 .'� i% +- ,5+ ',i , ,,y 7 . x,ry '.aa:. r OJ