The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-128.-4-9 0, E. 14.\2'\ tJ. ~' \O~ ~ U\ COo ~ ~o '3:. 0 '" '" ~ 'f -'? ~ -.0 ~ :::: -;- (3 - CO . ~ m \ -\ 0 -\ ... '> \ , 0 ~ CD o 'A) ~ r' fl\ '-~ , ~. ~ ~.., ~ A>. \ [t,>o" ~ O~..j. Q)'t r;?, 0,,0' f CJO q,~ . ~. &;~~ OQ~ ~~~ f< ~. , ~~~'t '~~o \ ' ~~~ S&J. ~.?" N/O/fSllSER \ 0, \ 15.0 'Z - o - -n ~ \, c} "~\''''"'''' c; 1,,11- I ~. . K- ~.(.,OV~ .s , .s f . ~ \:: ~~ <c ~'> ~ ~. 'to ~ r. rt-~ ~\O~ ,~~ ~. . o ," , 0" . , ,,0 ,,OJ OJ'" ~. . ~ ", ~ ~;J,; .. tl} ... o'~ . '::<. ....~ -z1/ I;! ,10-;.:'",. '0 _~ sf ~~. '> ~, '4. I~ '4' t<<_~~ 'Z -=4 ~. ~ "Z. N D~~ I.Q. (f "'. " ')> ~ 141Z'\ 46 sq. . . ~ ~ s. I O'~61 sq.lI. ')<.15,'- \ \. " ' lE& m \ ~R tJ~lE -,:\ RXRIAN t..4 ^A.~ 16 128~ ,V"'" 1000-- 2 ~ -;1: ~ OWNER HENRIETTA A. MORMILE \\6.98' 31 BREVOORT PLACE ROCKV1LLE CENTRE, N. Y. & J. . . S. 14'\2'10 \ . N/O~R:SSI , WApI) " ZONING DISTRICT R 40' \. N/Otf S~S'" \ ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS- 21.' ARE REFERENCED \ TO MSL. - 'N/Off .---- ---.- \ \ \ -,:\ ~ '{l -\ ~ 0 ... -n -& ~~ ~ '> . ~ - ltt \ ....00. \ ~1' J. Rt<A~ .IV { N , '\ SITE ~ r ;J ,~ ! 1(1 f8 II J..\ II II ~'t'q't IJ G SURVEY OF PROPERTY FOR LOT LINE CHANGE' A T1AUREL . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. y: 7000 - 128 - CU - 09,75 &16 $cale: 1~' = 40' No v, 9,1992 . APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD TO't.'U OF SOUTHOLD DATE . , .5. UC. NO. 496/8 , 1/97/ . . . Richard O. Ward, Chalnnan George RJtchte Latham. Jr. Bennett Orlowskf. Jr. Mark 5. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards , -" ," \rr!!{,( ," ::';V.", h"J l..' -.'>?:'" . i {\.":'f~ \.!--" ,~....~ ' ,-".1' __...._ - :', /- ,_ _,~i - ," ~ "-'~';'t :;- ,<"~~ :-'1}, 1 --',,\> f, . J .':' SCOTr L. HARRIS Supervisor PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ,-a::t.::J.-' Town Hall. 53095 Main Road p. o. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTH OLD Fax (516) 765 - 1823 September 14, 1993 Rudolph Bruer Edson & Bruer P.O. Box 1466 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed lot line change for Henrietta Mormile and Arthur and Marion Mormile SCTM# 1000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Bruer: The following took place at the September 13, 1993 Planning Board public meeting: The final public hearing for the lot line change of Henrietta Mormile and Arthur and Marion Mormile was closed. WHEREAS, Henrietta Mormile and Arthur and Marion Mormile are the owners of the property known and designated as SCTM# 1000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 located on peconic Bay Blvd.; and WHEREAS, this lot line change, to be known as lot line change for Henrietta Mormile and Arthur and Marion Mormile is for a lot line change is to subtract 2,322 square feet from a 6,935 square foot parcel and add it to a 7,500 square foot parcel; and to subtract 4,613 square feet from the same 6,935 square foot parcel and add it to a 10,648 square foot parcel, thus creating two parcels from three existing parcels. . . Page 2 Lot line change for Mormile September 14, 1993 WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on March 22, 1993; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said lot line change application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on September 13, 1993; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated November 9, 1992 and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys Subject to fulfillment of the following condition. This condition must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution. 1. The filing of new deeds pertaining to the merger of the 2,322 square feet from the 6,935 square foot parcel SCTMi 1000-128-4-15 with the 7,500 square foot parcel SCTMi 1000- 128-4-9 and the merger of the 4,613 square foot parcel from the 6,935 square foot parcel SCTMi 1000-128-4-15 with the 10,648 square foot parcel SCTMi 1000-128-4-16 A copy of the recorded deed must be presented to the Planning Board prior to endorsement of the final survey. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Q" ie7)Y' "i~;J;:1;;/1 fflf/dozp/ ^- J.chard G. Ward Chairman . AI ~' WEEN11~~' - AND IS LOCATED ON ~15 . scr 1000-/ - . 1:2'i'- ",.- 9,.11; "" /6 IN LOT LINE CHANGE \ Complete application received ~- Application reviewed at work session ... I=~I~ I~~ J2 -fo- 7';'" Applicl}nt a.dvi. sed .0f.l)ecess..ary revisions l.!:J.-,c-9...) j.i#fcd4'ZtfJ~ Revised submission received 7~(]~ 73 ~ ~ 1:lilinIr.::1 ~~ L dA C d' , t s6r1f"r~"'It(K."'('. ea gency oar matlOn f ~f _:;. _ f3 (..l. Ui/,tw SEQRA determination 3 " , '-If::> -5MT ~'12M Sent to County Planning Commission 0 ot-A (jf.c;,viO VA/trlltGf t<f9l!/~~ JI:fI? b~V 3 - ,. Review of SCPC report (!l""" t.- ;..~.:T:; -i'" ~T7) ~q~ f'J~_~. I:lilinIIQKl ~~ I:lilinIIQKl ~~ Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received I=~I~ 1:lilinIr.::1 ~~ Final Public Hearing :set f,;L 0/:. [ce::. '7 -/]-77 j-f?- T' ] Approval of Lot Line 6f-wiih OOlldit;nn& Endorsement of Lot Line ms 1/1/90 " - - ~ . PART 1-PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE; This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action I1roposcd may have a ~1J.,:nlflc.lnt cffl'ct on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any add.tlonal . information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies. research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address. Municipality and County) Off Peconic Bay Blvd., Laurel, New York NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR I BUSINESS TELEPHONE Mormile Arthur and Marian ( ) AODRESS - 31 Brevoort Place CITY/PO I STATE I ZIP CODE Rockville Centre NY 11570 NAME OF OWNER (If different) I BUSINESS TELEPHONE same ( ) ADDRESS CITY/PO I STATE I ZIP CODE . DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Merge SCrM ~J.OOO- '128-04-015 with SCrM 1000-128-04-16 with lot line change - Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use; DUrban Dlndustrial DCommercial KlResidential (suburban) DForest DAgriculture DOther DRural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area; .75:!: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTl Y AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or [Jrushland (Non-agricultural) n/a acres n/a acres Forested n I~ acres n/;l acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) n/a acres n/a acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECl) n/a acres n/a acres Water Surface Area n/a acres n/a acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) n/a acres n/a acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces n/a acres n/a acres Other (Indicate type) n/a acres n/a acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage; DlWell drained 100 % of ,ite DModeratcly well drained % of site DPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Arc there bedrock outcropplngs on project site? DYes lONo a. What is depth to bedrock? (in' feet) 2 . 14-16-2 (2/87)-7c . I 617_21 Appendix A :! Ii "'''1 State Environmental Quality Review i......; c,~.,N.- FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ;)J~!,::( ,;) I ~ ;-';":"~".._ ,.:____J Purpose: The full E,\F is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. in an 'orderly mahner. whether a proiec or action m<1y he slgndicant. "The questiun of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent Iy. there Me aspects at it pro/cct that arc subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determin, slgnlilcancc may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically e.xpert in environmenta analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectin! the question of significance. The full EAF is Intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatior process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action , tI j J ---. . SEQ! '--\. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may OCcur from a project or action. It provide: gurdance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentiallv large impact. The form a/so identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or notth, impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 0 Part 2 oPart 3 Upon review of the information ;ecorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magi tude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: >i-A. The project will not result in any. large and important ir:npact(s) and, therefore. is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. o B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative dec/aration will be prepared.' o C. The project may result ;n one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. . * A Conditioned Negative De laration is only valid for Unlisted Actions , cf- (?ICH/!;{O 6, fuffr(U Print o/rype Name of Re<ponsible Officer in Lead Agency Name of Action I p ~ 6l~ Nanle of ead Agency c t-I- ~/,.t ~#/j Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency n..ole Officer iiferent from responsible officer) Date 1 ~ r .. . 2. How much natural materidl (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be remov~d from the ~Ite' J. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes DNo ltJN/A a. If yes, for what intend--..~ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNa 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? nl a acres. S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes KlNo ., :',n'. , 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated n/a (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 n /" month c. Approximate completion date of final phase nf a month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? DYes 8. Will blasting Occur during construction? DYes mNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction nl a 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project nl a 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? n 1;:1 months, (including demolition). n/a nfa lONo year, (including demolition). year. ; after project is complete DYes lONo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes :tJNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) <lnd amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes WNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? DYes :tJNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes KlNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes UNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes DNa c. If yes, give name location d. Will any wastes nol go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes XoNo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes KlNo a. If yes. what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes UNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes IKlNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes lONo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity DYes lONo n/a gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day n/a gallons/day. 24. DOes project involve local, State or Federal funding? DYes lONo If Yes, explain 4 ~ .~. Approximate percentage of ~sed project site with slopes: mO'1t1t-lo 9{' 010-1S% % D15~.'O or:;rC'ater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or di<ilrict, listed on the State or rtw N.ItH)/l Registers of Historic Placesl DYes aNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of Nation<J1 Natural landmarks? OYl.... f.:;-..., 8. What IS the depth of the w.lter tabl,.1 cOt (in feet) 9. Is SHe IOC.HCU over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes }[]No 10. Do hunting. fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DYes JONo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered' DYes IKlNo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations DYes IiONo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area! DYes IXINo If yes, explain 14. Docs the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes G(JNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area~ n/ a a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name n/a 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities?lOYes DNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? b. Size (In acres) lUYes DYes DNo lONo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25.AA, Section 303 and 304? DYes lONo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6171 DYes JONo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes KJNo B. Project Description .--'') 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0 b. Project acreage to be developed: n/ a acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped n/ a acres. d. Length of project, in miles: n/a (If appropriate) c. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/ a f. Number of oft-street parking spaces existing n/ a ; proposed n/ a g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour n/ a (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family One acres. acres ultimately. %;. Initially Ultimately One i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure n/a height; n/a j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? Multiple FiI'lT1i1y Condominium width; n /a n/a ft. length. 3 ~ . Part 2.ROJECT IMPACTS AND THElaAGNITUDE Responsibility 01 lead A~ency General Inlormation (Read Carefully) . In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. o Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily signilicant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identilying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. o The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicabl~ throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examples andlor lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. . The impacts of each project, on each site, in cach locality. will vary. Therefore. the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. . The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question: o In identifying impacts. consider long term. short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided. check column 2. If impact wdl occur but threshold is lower than example. check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then conSider the Impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by changers) in the project to a small to moderate impact. also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change fo" 0 DYes DNa r 0 DYes DNa [] 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project sitel DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater. (15 loot rise per 100 foot of length). or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. o Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. o Construction of paved parking area for 1.000 or more vehicles. . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. . Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. . Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e.. rock or sod) per year. . Construction or expansion of a sanitary Jdndfjll. . Construction in a designated floodway. o Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t,. ...IY u:..que or unusual land for s found on . the Site? (i.e.. cliffs. dunes. geological formations. etc.) NO DVCS o Specific land forms: 2S. Approvals Required: , City. Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town Zoning Board City. County Health Department Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies . . Submittal Date' Type DYes DlNo DYes GINo DYes KJNo "- DYes lONo DYes JPNo DYes flNo DYes XJNo DYes .:DNo c. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? aVes DNo. If Ves, indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment Dzoning variance Dspecial use permit Dsubdivision Osite plan Oncw/revision of master plan Dresource management plan 'lK]other Lot line change 2. What is the zoning c1assification(s)of the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? N/A 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? S" What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as N/A Residential permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? K1Ves Di' 7. What are- the predominant land use(s) and zoning .c1assifications within a 1J. mile radius of proposed action? Residential 8" Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V. mile? IXIVes 01'; 9" If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/ A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sew"er or water districts? DVes lJI'; 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, pori" fire protection)? DYes XJNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes DNa 12" Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? DVes IXIN, a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DVes DNo. D. Informational Details Attach any additianal information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any advers impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate ( avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the informiltion provided ilbove is true to the best of my knowledge. APPlicant/Spoyar Name Arthur Mormile Date 12/.30 /92 Signature --f1~<<-Z- ~ ~~ Title Aoolicant/Soonsor If the actian is in the Caastal Area, and yau are a state al:ency, complete the Caastal Assessment Form before proceedin with this assessment. . " 5 =- . . . Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. . Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. . Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will induce 1.000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. . Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. . Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed Sibs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site, over or near site or found on the site. o Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. o Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. o Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. . Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. ' IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect .,gricultural land resources? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to a~ricultur~ll land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard. etc.) 8 1 " -- . -----., <- Smail to PotentIal I C~ln I~r-:l:":t :1.. Moderate Large Mltlqatecl Uy Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o .;. o DYes DNo o DYes DNo o DYes DNo o DYes DNo o DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DYes DNo DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo u' , IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15. 24. 25 of the EnVironmental Conservation law, ECl) DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Developable area of site contains J protected water body. . Dred~:rng mort:' than 100 cubiC yards of material from channel of a protecteu stre.lm. . Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. . Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. . Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. . Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. . Other impacts: 5, Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will Jequire a discharge permit.. . Proposed Action requires use. of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. . Proposed Action reql!ires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. . Construction or operation czusing any contamination of a water supply system. . Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. . liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. . Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. . Proposed Action will like!v CZlu-.;e siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to tr;e extent that there will be an obvious visuaL contrast to natural conditions. . Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. . Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water andlor sewer services. . Proposed Action locates comrr.ercial and/or industrial usp;;; which may require new or expansion of existing waste trealmt'llt ilnd/ar storage facilities. . Other impacts: 6, Will proposed action alter drainilge ilow or patterns, or surface water runoff? DNa DYES Ex.mples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 1 Small to Moderato Impact o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o :;.. 2 Potential Large Impact o o o o o o o o o o o o o D o o o o o o o 3 Can Impact B Mitigated By Project Chang DYes DYes DYe,s DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes. DYes DYes DYes DYes DNc ONe DNc DNc DNc DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNO DNO - .. . 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? DNO DYES 1 2 3 , Small to Potential Can Impact [Je Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 D- OVes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 oVes DNa D D oVes DNa D 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 D oVes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 oVes DNa 0 0 DVes . DNa 0 0 oVes DNa 0 0 oVes DNa 0 0 oVes oNO 0 0 DVes DNa IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? DNa DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. . Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? DNa DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. . Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. . Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? DNa DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other senSitive facility. . Odors will Occur routinely (more than one hour per day). . Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. . Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would clet as a noise screen. '. Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH Examples that would apply to column 2 . Propo.'ied Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (Le. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. . Proposed Action may result in the burial of "h~'lardOllS wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, hIghly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) . Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natur.;1 . gas or other flammable liquids. . Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 teet of a site used tor the di;posal of solid or hazardous wa!.lc. . Oth"'r impacts: 10 "- .J ~ : . Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. . The proposed action would irreversibly convert morc than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. . The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? DNa DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-mJde or natural. . Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. . Project components that will result in the elimination Qr significant screening' of scenic views known to be important to the area. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre. historic or paleontological importance? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. . Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. . Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 DNa DYES . The-permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. . ^ major reduction of an open space important to the community. . Other impacts; 9 , 1 2 3 ! Small to Potential Can Impact Be i Moderate Large Mitigated By i Impact Impact Project Change I D D DYes DNo ; D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo - -- I I I , i D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNn D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo ~ 617.21 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum '. -. 14.1-1.11 (2.B7)-9c . ::. This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: . A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man.made scenic qualities? . An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? . . A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? . State Parks? . The State Forest Preserve? . National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? . National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? . National Park ServiCe lands? . Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? . Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? . A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter.county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? . A site. area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? . Municipal park, or designated open space? . County road? . State? . Local road? Distance Between Project and Resource (in Miles) 0.'1. ';"'12 '12.3 3.5 5+ o 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0-. 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage. but visible during other seasons) DYes ONo 3. Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? DYes ONo '1 . .. I IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . The permanent population of the city. town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. . The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. . Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. . Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. . Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities. structures or areas of historic importance to the community. . Development will create a demand for additionarcommunity services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) . Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. . Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. . Other impacts: .. 1 2 3 i Small to Potential Can Impact Be I Large I Moderate Mitigated By I Impact Impact Project Change I D D DYes DNa I D D DYes DNa D D DYes DNa D D DYes DNa D D DYes DNa D n D DYes DNa D . 0 DYes DNa D D DYes DNa D D DYes DNa 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? DNO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of lead Agency ,Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. !lased on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: . The probability of the impact occurring . The duration of the impact . Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value . Whether the impact can or will be controlled . The regional consequence of the impact . Its potential divergence from local needs and goals . Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 '" . . DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question I, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within "'/. mile "1 mile Essentially undeveloped Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial Commercial Urban River, Lake, Pond Clirrs,. Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed o o o o o o o o D- O o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 5. Are there visually similar projects within: "'Iz mile DYes ONo "I miles DYes ONo "2 miles DYes ONo . .3 miles DYes ONo " Distance rrom project site are provided ror assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number or viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. Activity Travel to and rrom work Involved in recreational activities Routine travel by residents At a residence At worksite CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the p,oposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays! Weekends o o o o o o Daily o o o o o o Weekly o o o o o o Seasonally o o o o o o Other 2 . . Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: SCTM 1000 - 128 - 04 - 16 Gentlemen: Please be advised that I am the owner of the subject premises and I approve of the within application for Lot-line change. I am under contract to purchase part of_ premises known as SC'I'M 1000-128-04- 015 and same will be merged with my property. Very truly yours, Sworn to before me this 2nd day of December, 1992 a::;;;;~~ cf~~~ ......=.~~ .... 4841nl. ~C:U-. I o 1 .I._"~ .....l!IIplnIa DEe - 8 i , , ! f" "--'--....- L__..__ -~ / , ) ... . ., . . ~ S~ff~L(.~;'S PLA:J"'~ING?B~. O:A,RD M ,""" ,.~". I. ". '. 'l~.,. _, \:\ ;:t '- . ".~' l.~~;..,,,-..~. _ l'" TO:€N '.'k., '1'~,~if! ~Ot!' LD \:l',.>-::: ~"'r""'"'''''''' '\:\.:.-?_...._--.-._.......~.., 'I SUFF~O..LIC=.,-COI] 1 TY , ',,/ .~ '\0 ' ....." :"-:.J. I 'C 81Y' or. - '=i'-L Southold. N.Y, 11971 (516) 765-1938 ~~-----Q-' ~ ,., "". 1 p1L;';t'd'!\-L_..~l_-..~___ QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE CONPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORNS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Offi.ce of the 'Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer to any of the following questions is ~, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or subm~t other appropriate evidence, 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? ~ No (Attached is a list. o.f the wetland grasses defined by the !?wn Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? Yes ~ 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? ~ No 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department.o.r agency? (Town. ,. State, County, etc.) ID@tX., No 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parCel? ~ No 6. Was this property the subject of any prior. application to the Planning Board? l1'<!i~ No 7. Does this property have a valid certificat6 of occupancy, if yes pl~a~e submit a copy of same lICMXX No . . I certify that the above statements are true on by the Planning Board in Considering ~his . . a1:V~J ~#~t?L'e.- - . S~gnat:ure or p operty O\>'ner or author~;:ed agent and will be relied application. ". ". date .... " " .... . , . . " -" -, Attachment to questionnaire for...the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: On the 2nd day of December , 19~~ before me personally to me known to be the came Arthur Mormile individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrume and acknowledged that he exe ed~a~e. ~'-----h1. Notary Public .. LINDA.... TOHves Notary PublIc, St8te of New Vork _ .- No. 4942668. 'Suffolk Ceu Term E'YOl/"es Octoh"'r 3, : :', ~ ",~.-"'" ' (,'j :--~i ..~ (" . . . . ...... 14-16-4 (2187)- Text 12 I PROJECT 1.0. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C ..' . State Environmental Quality: niI~ieW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASS~~lVIENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS R~)'. DtC- e SEQR PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) L__... .--1 \ 1. APPLICANT ISPONSOR I 2. PROJECT NAME c' ,:~i.iu.b I pi i ,,.: Arthur Mormile and Marian 'l~ 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Laurel County Southold 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) SCTM #1000 - 128 - 04 - 015 Off Peconic Bay Blvd. , Laurel, New York 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: o New o Expansion fi Modification/alteration Lot Line Change 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Merge SCTM 1000-128-04-015 with SCTM 1000-128-04-16 with lot line change 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? !f] Ye. ONo If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? gJ Residential o Industrial o Commercial o Agriculture o Park/Forest/Open space o Other Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? DYe. UNo If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTlot~ HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? DYe. libuo If ye~, list agency name and permit/approval .' 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ---.... DYe. IXI No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Arthur Mormile Date: J~-a-q~ Stgnat\Jre: 11~. ,_I,. } . fiJ1_/1 AAd-IJ/ . . If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. OVER 1 . PART II-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) . ... .' A. DOES ACTION ~cj-ED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12? OVes ~NO B. WilL ACTION Redl:ECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR. PART 617.61 may be supersed by another Involved agency. OVes C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY AOVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (AnSwers may be handwritten, If legible) Cl. existing air Quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential tor erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. If No, . negative declaration Jib C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: 1'/6 C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: lib C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? explain briefly fY D C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be Induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. rlu C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C5? Explain briefly. rib C7. Other Impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. /"/6 D. IS THERE. OR IS THERE L1KELV TO BE, CONTROVERSV RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? o Yes ~ No If Yes, explain briefly . PART III-DETERMINATION OFSIGNIF.ICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For e"ach adverse effect identified above, determine whether It Is substantial, large, Important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with Its (a) seffing (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) Irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. o Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occu!. T-hen proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. o Check this box if you have determined, based on the Information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOr result in any. significant adverse environmental impacts .., ,ro."" pEOlI::.::"'"' , "" '''~;~''O" ., ;'e~le.~.encY ~/T~ ~~1;.:!.on,d.!:::164/6( ]-{S""-J3 Date Signature of Preparer (if different from responsible officer} 2 . ,. . . . '. . Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall SouthOld, New York 11971 Re: Gentlemen: The fOllowing statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads ~re proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of eXisting structures are proposed. Yours truly, tJui;~~- ). ... Pre f' . .., -,' . . . . . APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold TOWIL. Planning Board. and represents and states as follows: r' 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land nnder application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the snbdivision is to be .................................................... . . . . . r:-/~. . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. . .. .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested. ) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Snffolk Connty Clerk's office as follows: Liber ..~?~~................. Page .... .n.9.............. On .. .QI.~~J.e:4...........; Liber ..87.51................. Page.... ~5a............. On .. .12./.2Aj'J.9.........; Liber ..~?q?................. Page .... .~~.6.............. On .. .4/.Hl.?P...........; Liher ........................ Page On ........................ Liber ........................ Page On ........................ ~~llUliIMl(\X~@U{~KMX\HK)clrll@C:~mf ....................................... XUDllJ[~IlC'........................................................................ S. The area of the land is .... 7.':1 . .:!; . . . . . . . . acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the rlate hereof have been paid except ............ .................... Ai........................................................................ 7. The land is encumbered by . ..no.. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . ... ... . . . . .. . .. . . . mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page... .. . . . . . . .. . . '" in original amount of $. . . .. " .. . . '" unpaid amount $ ..................... held by ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. address ................................................................. (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page ....................... in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. held by ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. address ................. .............................................. . . . . . (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $...... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. held by ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. address ......................................................... 8. There arc no other encumbrances OT liens ag-ainst the land except ........................ .......~9.1')~........................... 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts residential 10. !\o part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex~ cept .. none. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (do~ (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis. trict, if \vithin a District, is ............................................................. U. Water mains will be laid by ... .I:lii..................................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. l-l. Electric lines and standards will be installed by na ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. na IS. Gas mains will be installed by ............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "E" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public strects in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "e" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing- buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. \Vhere the plat shows proposed streets \,"' hich are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing' maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will "ffer proof of title as reqnired by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions. covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". . . 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $..q: .0.9... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at.. .0...00...... years. The Performance Bono will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F", ~1J /JJt~~ ............................................... DATE... .I?~.c.:~!l!1?!'!.~..~ 1..........., 19.9.? (Name of Applicant) Arthur Mormile By . .................. ................... ...... (Signature and Title) .. .pO. .13.QJ:C. .69.!l ,. .~P.tt..i.t.qCK.. .Wi... J..l~.!i2 (Address) ST:\ TE OF XEW YORK. COUNTY OF '" SUF.EOLK.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., ss: On the 2nd day of..... P.E7C;:.E7I!l~€!!'............., 19. .9.?.. before me personally came . Ar.thUr. .Mo.rm:i.le. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. to me known to be the individual described in and who ~'xccuted the foregoing instrument, and ackno\vledged that.... he..... executed the same. ~~~~ic,s;aI8 N ~~ No. 4942668. Suff 1)ff , Term Expiret October 3. 18:J.:;t. ST,\TE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF .. ?~~.~,?~.k................ ss: On the................ day............ of .............., 19......, before me personally came . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No. .................................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . that .......................... is the .......... of .......................................................................... the corporation described in and which executed the fort'going- instrument; that............ knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. and that. . . . . . . . . . .. signeo .............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public --- NO CXlNSIDERA tion Dist: 1000 Sec: 128.00 Blk: 04.00 I.J::>t: 009.00 ~"~:">. ~ ~{t'. ~~'l.~~ {g~" -t.~{Q~;~'~L I \.\;~':'';f '., . "" ".' ',...-,,"..;' 'ii' .::~. ~~,\~ oW:':!"...'I...... 3~ (? K ~ \,. ,) . L18ER 9582 rACE 139 SI.Il"I~IJ N.\',U.r.u. }U'U1 1IOlJ~'.~UM . -U~r,;oin ;011<1 S;ok Uc"J, ,,'ilb CtlH'lIi1l1h .....i'bl CnIllUl"~ ..\co-lmli\iuu.ll.>l c...1....lilLjull. (.illllll: .1i<<1) CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUlolENT. THIS INSTaUlolENT SHOULD IE USED IV LAWYERS ONLY THIS INDENTURE, made the ~;; -< day of May BElWEEN , nineteen hundred and eighty-four 3G4'i't3 EUGENE MJRMILE & HENRIE'ITA A. MJRMILE, his wife, both residing at 32 Brevoort Place, Rockville Centre, New York party of the first part, and ,.~. 8 "'-:,,- HENRIE'ITA A. MJRMILE, 'residing at 32 Brevoort Place, Rockville Centre, New York ;-- party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece Or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being~ a part of the land formerly owned by John Hallock, situate, lying and being at Laure;!.,in the 'l'Own of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: , BEGINNING at a point on the westerly line of land of the parties of the first part 171 feet southerly along said line fran the southerly line of Peconic Bay Boulevard and adjoining land of Bacchus; RUNNING 'llID'lCE easterly on a line at right angles to the last described line, 75 feet; THENCE along the westerly line of a strip of land reserved for a right of way and parallel to the first described line 100 feet; 'lHENCE westerly on a line at right angles to the last described line 75 teet to said land of Bacchus; THENCE along the last described land north west 100 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Being and intended to be the same premises as was described in deed recorded December 24, 1979 in Liter 8751, page 156 Said Premises also known as (No Street Number) Peconic Blvd., Laurel, N.Y. 364',t; ~I""" $ " .J REii ii':" <i JUN 151984 TRANSFE;-\X SUrro! ,- COUNTY' 1 l~~ TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the Center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and tQ said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premis,'s herein granted unto the party of the second part, th,- heirs Or SUCCesSOrs and assigns of the party of the s~cond part forever. .f AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not donc or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as afortsaid. AND the party of the first pari, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust .fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improv,-ment and will apply thl.: same first to th~ payment of the cost of the improvement bdore using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word Ilparty" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indentllre 'So requires. IN, WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly ex.cut~ee<hh..~ay and year first above wntten, ( t....~ / 1 N PkESEN CE OF: ' ~ -,-, ,;:?'l-, ''Y-.-..-d.., Eugene Ibrmile - //-i.'-t.-V~,_~/t{A.._ C. 7~LJ'~.)..j..-~.r......'_L->- Henrietta A. M:lrmile . /Jt)~ PAGE 14U ... O. NEWYU. COUNTY O' ,'the ...l.).:. day of May ,asonatry -came EUGENE MJRMILE & HENRIElTA A. MJRMILE, his wife k b h ' '" 1 "d' to Illl' .nown to t' t e m< IVI{Iua s c1t'scnbed tn an who cxccuh..'U the (oregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they executed the same. NASSAU 1984 ,before me ~amos ...., s_ of _York "8li4O a..nlt:i n Na...u County ~ eommlulon EllIllr... M.roh 30 19atjO STATE O' NEW YOR., COUNTY O' On the day of 19 , before me J>l'rsonally came to me known, who, being- by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he is the of . tht. corporation described in and which executed thr foregoing instrument: that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate s('al; that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. infuniu nub g,nlr irrb WiTH COVENANT AGAINST CRANTOR~S ACTS TtTLE NO. EUGENE MJRMILE & HENRIETrA A. MJRMILE, his wife TO HENRIETrA A. MJRMILE STANDARD FORM OF NEW YORK BOARD OF TITLE UNDERWRITERS Distributed by CO.CAGO T.TLE .Nsvn....NCE COMP....NY . IS, STATE O' NIW YOU, COUNTY O' IS, On the day of personally came 19 , before me to me known to be the individual executed the foregoing instrument, executed the same. described in and who and acknowledged that IS: STATI O' NEW TORM, COUNTY O' 55: On the day of 19 , before me personally came the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he 'knows to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw execute the same; and that he, said witness, at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. SECTION 128.00 BLOCK 04.00 LOT 009.000 COUNTY ~ Suffolk Town of Southold Rec.t)rdcd at RequClt of CHICACO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Return by Mail to Dean G. Skelos, Esq. Hayt, Hayt & Landau 600 Northern Blvd. Great Neck, N. Y. 11021 Zip No. w U u: ~ o ll> "" c '" o u w '" ~ o w ~ ::> '" o ~ w U -< ~ ~ ~ I ~ w ,. '" w ~ w .'" 20[jJ \ lHnnn ;nO~~I\S A ~O ;\'.\310 ""-\""1 "; l1.13\lnf '11"1;.: " 1"0. WJ \lil m ~\ un, a3(11JO::l3~ ;,)1"' ~ T8s' I. ~ \~.i~ v (.J::; c: C\! '..\..1 i...; 10DD 5~c /)o,()D 61/\ [)l-f.o /) l01 o 1.5 ,ooD ('>V\0 ~ \>, " 1"0 ~ ) ~J '" ., , ~ " ~ . . ,,,,,,.., KY. .t. ,If,.. ","- ...,... '"' "', D~'. .n"", eo".... .,...n C.."",', ."'-,.."..,..,,, eo,,,,,,..,,. (...",,~ CONSULT YjOUPLAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT.THISINSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED IY LAWYERS ONLY 'J'.'"R7[jj;! I',\er 158 THIS 1,~DIJNTURE,madethe 7th day of De~ember ,nineteen hundred and s;,venty-nine BETWEl::N EUGENE G..BELZ and EDNA M. BELZ, his wife, both residing at 9509 243rd Str~ t, Bellerose, Nassau, New York. party of the first part, and .....!~'.. HENRIETTA A. MORMILE, residing at 32 Brevoort Pla~e, Rockville Centre, New York. party of the second part, W,ITNESSETH, that th( party of the first part', in consideration of ten dollars and othc.-r valuable considl.:ralioll paid by the party of the second part, does hereby ~rant and release unto the party of tile second part, the heirs or successors and ass'gns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, IYlllg and belng'IIKlbx at Laurel, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the North~~st ~orner of the land of the parties of the second part, whirh point i8 South 15 degrees 47 minutes 50 se~onds East 171.0 feet from a point formed by the intersection of the southeasterly line of peconic Bay Boulevard with the easterly line of the land this day conveyed by the party of the first part to Connelly, and RUNNING THENCE !:rom said point 0 I' beginning SouthE degrees 47 minu tes 50 seconds East along the land of the parties of the se~ond part 100.00 feet to the southwest rorner of the land of the parties of the se~ond part; RUNNING THENCE South 71 degrees l~ minutes 10 se~onds West along the land of the party of the first part 119.65 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE North 17 degrees 29 minutes 50 seronds West along land now or formerly of C.F. Lampe 15.54 feet to the southwest ~orner of land thi~ day conveyed by the party of the first part to McGowan; RUNNING THENCE North 39 degrees 05 minutes 10 seconds East along land this day conveyed by the party of the first part to McGowan 146.84 feet to ,the point or place of.BEGINNING. .../--r.. ~{!Je,,{t.. '1'1.-'-' ~ (U.l .t:1u- ,~/.lU4r""a....- .t~ kll>> I~~.<J t. DISTRICT 1000..&-.~ 33E.a /' ';<0' 128.00 SECTION BLOCK 04.00 015.000 Lot TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part, in and to any streets and roads abutting the above-described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AN 1) TO HOLD the premises herdn granted unto the J}arty of the' second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to rl.:ccivc such consid- eration as a trU:.it fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of Lhe improvement and will o\pply the same first to tilt: payment of the cost of the improvem(nt before using any part of the total of the same for any otl1t:r purpose, The word Uparty" shall be construed as jf it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: ~~1J1. !3p)y f17dh16-/f Z-ry . l'Bfk-&751 1','Gf 158 STATE O' NEW YORK, COUNTY o' J0l~et~ SS: On the 7thlayof December 1979,beforeme personally came EUGENE G. BELZ and EDNA M. BELZ to me known to be the individual s d~scribed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowlc:dged that the y executed the same. c>Lft:J~/ lHo.~l f J. UEBEIl I'iotory Public Sl~le yf N<:w Yotic No. 41.~35677J 0.-.0' C<lUnly TtW'T'r'l 1~;(PI(f'''I M'lrcn 30, lergl STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 19 . before me personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he is the of , the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that h(." knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed 10 said instrument is such corporate seal: that it was so anixed by order of the board of director; of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. iargain ann {$1nlf IDun WITHOUT COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'S Acrs TITLE NO. 77-0~-.::ls(}';3!) - .?()_'3{,.:Lti-S EUGENE G. BELZ and EDNA M. BELZ TO HENRI E T'rA A. MORMI LE SIAJjDARD fDRM Df NEll YDRK IDUD Df TIll[ UNDElWRITUS ""'.-;''''./''' ." .~ COUNTY ABSTRACT CO., INL ONE OLD COUNTRY ROAD CARLE PLACE, NEW YORK 11514 PHONE 516.248.1IBO & 212-895.3266 -:<. . STATE O' NEW YORK. COUNTY OF On the day of personally came 55: 19 , before me 10 me known to be the individual executed the foregoing instrument, exc:cuted the same:. described in and who and acknowledged that STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 19 . before me personally came the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he knows to be the individual described in and who executed the forcgoillg instrument; that he, s:..t.id subscribing wi~ncss. was pTl'scnt and saw execute the same; and that h<.', said witness, at the same time subscribed h name as witnt:ss thereto. SECTION 128:00 04.00 015.000 ULOCK LOT COUNTY OR TOWN Southo1d, .Suffo1k Jt.ccordtd . at Requat of CHICAGO TtTLE INSURANCE COMPANY Return by Mail to 1-/ /I '( r I ;-//J'II r( 6-:::'- Alv 12-77I-t::?_.J C;; t2.nr--r /\/e:?/<, A ;V bA-d. {:-.s :. 13.L- yJ:> AJ.Y 1. /J7T:' Jft CIf-7H::.l.- Zip No. '/HI' A I .J lid':; I t"? - ... U .. ~ 0 <!l z 0 '" 0 . U ... '" ~ ~. : 0 ... '-' '" :> '" 2 ... u 0( ~ '" '" ::: ~ ... > '" ~ ~ '" -, v! ,. , .,\ ''OJ C'J .,.. C::J C\l c~~. ...--:- ("-' 'I':: '- , '.'1 ".:" '-' ,".1 c:\ . , . . ... I 1.....,1"98 " \.~... ~.ED $,... . ..:5" R~AL ESTA"ri1:'. DEe 2 4 1979 TR'ANSFPR TAX 5~KP0l.1( COUNTY . . ~ / / f-:- 6~O L-=] Ss CJ S ~ ~ f7i. /P 7d9Pr5 '- - " S \'t ~ v i p.rt)' Qf the 6r" plrt, UMl ^.~I IoRMJR HJIfIW:: , 1WUNl1O!lllE. IUa wU.. -. ~ - 31 .. _J~'"t w.. CBn..... - Yod<. . . SIC. " ~. ()O I IIU<. ().4 . oOl!':!1.f 1M 0<<0<>l pan. ~-W~ tNl 1M p&ny of &he 6nt pan. U. ~oI 1Pi/01l. oc<.:.L___________. _ . 00/ 100 / -"1'- / (_~_.~WfW 1hOQr)" uf lM l'nitrd Sl.&k', ,______..k r.,.. by the party of \he k>.......l pt.rt, JIA" hrnby If&AI u.4 ,.'k.... WIlli) the .......}~, UW............. ....';:_. ; _........"~~".,~-~~.," ". --../ ALL Ilwt cmain p&oe. l'i<<c (Ie 1..feltl ~f L.nd. ..i\.h &hi ~ aM .,.~ --...... .....;1 ..I"J ~. l,incaodw"",1lIdIIc a< 1.>",..1. nw> OI_UloId. s..tfolk~. - -. - ;)~ '1 1 'I. -"icularly lxJuI>Jud 4nJ ..._ibud ... r<>I~1 vl -.J '>. ~ W:lJl1i:UlJ:; .~l. UIl' ::,o'IUUIO"H,t.- <JJOa:C c.t l~b.~ lc...ora:d'J ClJllWjUi u,' ilie itArry loia'. lu L''*'P"Il.: ~. h..,,'h '-'111.1 1:.J.t.... H; la:l.L. hl~ ....11..., \IIu.cIl 1J'.l_u~t ill s. l~. 41' W &. 271.0 twt fran. a [..Oint Cornu.! kit U\r.' 1l\tttt'....'"\.1on ot t.iw ~\aCly u.. of Pucooic li.;a'... boulu"~\fll '."'t.H th:t uQ.l.owrl~' l1nC 0: c.r. 1..-..:1 tonarly ~ lrt w. Hart)' r..1..:;IW( to J~'1.(1 H. Cl:Q:lIl.;lly .>>)J 1.A.w1rt.t.A A. Q:Innolly, hJ.a ~ runni.Jl~ tJ:"W.:Ik:C S. 11)0 .&71 ~O" L. ~.O i......:t; ~J tlwlQt S. 10&- U' 10.... 116.98 1",,< .w,.j oU>"r 1..-<1 0/ w. IW-lj' u.....r '"'" "" lorarlV of c. r. ...... n:vlllll t:h<n:e N. 17' 29' ~. w. "\"'''1 l4nJ..... or _IV of c.r. __.... , Iw< to <he ....uU1olUlltAU"ly comor <>/ l4nJ 10000000IV ~ by W. lIony u.- 'to Il<><jonu G. Bolz 4nJ Wno M. Ilulz. ~. wile, ~ _ II. .;.. U' \0" l- i allDllonll tOlllUtIV ocn""l"l'l by w. lIi&ny We_ to ~ G. 11011 lIAiI ... ~ : Pull;, ~a wHo, 119.6~ 'wt. to tho ~Lnt or ~ of~" '- -, "i', Sl.W= 'f(). I, 100< ri.Jh<-ur_V OWl U. ............IV I~ t_ of tllu ~ .. isl~fCti8 ,;uk..! UioJrcl:ib t n"l\ l>u...'UllI.c I.w.j' ~ulo\V\l to ar-c. JWIa&,c ~.. ' 'ca..nl&ll wiU, ...<1 .s ........_ to u" "'-_ .......~~. . f'''' ~ lIII;f for lnoJr.... and U<pW8 traa """ to ~ IIoy 1Ilal1-..l to ~ ~ .. ". ,"",,',. 1$ twt U> wiolth, to tho _u.-ly 11... of ~V *-&v _~ lID .1S><aiL1.to and M....o" "'",111_. 4l>l 10 r....< in wWth t... .... lID' '1\ to Qna\ ., 'l'U.t, Along thtI WNlto,.ly UNI of pnllol'r\'J ~~_~rh...' 11\ 4 QW\ilUn "'*-' tna..u.v . ,/: It. 'l'Wnlll T4~jU w W. lkarry l.un,4i&l, J.at~ It.r~-toq". n. I'". w I" I . 1.. !~~ u.. 81111,,1. WIlI.ly Cluck'. all."" ill Llioor J21111 of o..llI. .... n. ua - . l.A "".' .19$1. to bll I.-l il. WIIllflI' by u.. .......... <>1 tllu ........w p.v\ lIAiI. _ ... _ ....; fun pan. IUa IAI<lAI h\'I'_~l1\..... ....Ira """ ........ . . . .0lZ11IIIIl WIUI tho nljlt to ..... """" .....Uun of ..Ill 10 '-' f"'~~ .. u.:', ._th of tllu .....<""1 _ ..wJ tlw '....\.I....ly ._. l\1\li> ~l.tlJ U... 01 _d. j ......,...., Iloy tor lAo\.lW"J ..wJ blloot.Ill _ ..w I.... ......""" UII ~ ..; ~Il>>o"', ~;-. 1lI::L1C tho ..... pr....._ ,"",wy.I by W. IlMry We.... .... .......let.. ~ .... _lu by u...J <low.! Jl4ly U, I'U ..wJ ,.......t.Iln \Ill IWI\alA ~ cwa'. oUios OIl Jl4ly..P,~ )1lI0 " _ 0\ _... _- u . \ , ~ "ii,.~ : \ ,.... ".,,,... \ ,.- "')' ,~ .':,1<\\900 ...... .lb. TlV<"l.':n<.D. y...x .~ ~\J"~"-; " ~ 3/' lj>, ~ ~ . . " . . . I 'Sc..'ft~ ~ n7 Iti ~,1j~lt~.);J TQG.ITHEJt ,jlb.u nrbt. titk anJ Lnlt'rat, II In.)'. uf ti.t """t' '..I Lhe 6u. ..." ia......,., ~~~, road. a1.IolUUJ.' lhe .t..o\'t' Je~n~ prmll"l I.. the ,mlU :a... Ih..,~,1. TQG.ITHEJt ".ith the :t.W~rtC'lWl':f't and &II the ..Ia!C .ui<J n,bu of 1.bc ~7 (i' dM ". .... ill .. . ~ -; . ...id ptCIDiaca, 1'0 HAVE AND TO HOLD the prc-mi". hc:rtm r.,.:r.j N~t6 the p6I1} ...t 1M ~ ,.,c. ..... t .- WCChf.<IH .w.J "hi~, lIf the parly uf Ihc WNDlI pirt fOfI' o\ND .... 1""1 .f Ill< if.. l"" __ ... 1M ...., 04 ... .... .... 11M ... - .. _..... wlWrcb:Y 11M W4 ~, NYC I... ....... ...) .~ .....nct................. AND" pili, 8'''' ".....,... -""y'r-'-._:i..-. II.... L.... t.... _____...........' " 1M 6f'1II: plrt wdI r"u'in: Ihr ,.....srt~ ,.. tat, ~...h~.......... .Ai.I........................... ..r.lilJP.Jf Ilrual 'lU"! lu t.- ...1'......'..... I", t"" l'W~ ",.............."..~....... ............ L1w.: 1WlI'"' tlrol l,.lt~ ~""I~.'''' ..j UK _wi..., &W .....~L T I'Ql __...... ~"h "'........ 1M _.. &NY wllwr ""'..... , TIIo -.I "l""" ... w __ ..1111 ... .......... - .. - oj ... ........ ....... ;,; ;1"'WlllllllWU"'~'u.. "'It) ~ u.....t ~II,.. 'i.....l.....,~..."~~ oi................... .rl~..... 1_ ......." Uf I I,. . !f. I" .... I. ......""U""llliioll. -~~;'~k AN,....lea ~ . w..'t:;~:~~l~:'" ""~'l:"""'" ~ll..':" .. """......Ii\ii:-- If.. I "', " . . . ...., ~~~. tB Rr-; ., -"'~."""'''.f/~~'~.'~''''''''''. . I" . - t ~ '\ .I!o.~. "..~ WILLIAM H. PRICE, JR. ATTORNEY AT LAW PO BOX 2065 GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (516) 477-1016 FAX: (516) 477-0130 November 29, 1993 Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 main Rod P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: LOT LINE CHANGE FOR HENRIETTA A. MORMILE AND ARTHUR AND MARIAN MORMILE SCTM 1000-128-4-9, 15 AND 16 Gentlemen: I am in the process of preparing the paperWork to satisfy the condition relative to the granting of final approval of the subject lot line change as outlined in your letter dated September 14, 1993. With reference to the filing of a new deed merging the 2,322 square foot parcel (plo lot 15) with lot 9: Henrietta A. Mormile is currently in title to both of these parcels. Please advise the undersigned if you will require a deed conveying plo lot 15 from the Estate of Henrietta A. Mormile to the Estate of Henrietta A. Mormile. It seems to me that the title is already merged and a deed from the estate to the estate would merely confuse matters. I await your reply. /2 ~1-13 //~ / ~4 ?~~A ~~__. ~.L 4 .N".,.( ~. Very truly yours, ~ William H. Price, Jr. WHP/lmt enclosure cc: Mr. and Mrs. Arthur Mormile DEe 11993 828 Front Street, Greenport, New York 11944 . . S uthold Town Planning Board 6 September 13, 1993 Ayes: Mr. McDonalc, Mr. ------------~ Edwar~~ws"C Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Oppose? Ion carried. ******************** Mr. Ward: 7:40 p.m. Henrietta Mormile and Arthur ann Marion Mormile -- This lot line change is to subtract 2,322 square feet from a 6,935 square foot parcel and add it to a 7,500 square foot parcel; and to subtract 4,613 square feet from the same 6,935 square foot parcel and add it to a 10,648 square foot parcel, thus creating two parcels from three existing parcels in Laurel. SCTM# 1000--128-4--9, 15 & 16.Is the applicant here this evening? Rudolph Bruer: Rudolp'1 Bruer on behalf of the applicant. Gentlemen, ladies, I believe all the arguments have been set forth before the Board and I thin~ you're all a',are of them. If you have any questions I'd be happy to answer them rat'1er than waste the Board's time. I thin~ it's all there. We've dis-- cussed it. We've been to the 'Zoning Board of Appeals. I thin', everyUling meets your conditions and respectfully request that you grant the application. Mr. Ward: OK, anybody else li~e to be heard on this application? If not, the Board? Mr. Orlm,s'd? Mr. Orlowsld: No questions. Mr. Ward: Mr. Latham? Mr. Latham: No. Mr. Ward: Mr. McDonaliJ? Mr. McDonald: None. Mr. Ward: Mr. Edwards? Mr. Edwards: None. Mr. Ward: OK, all is in order then to close the hearing. Mr. Orlowski: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Ward: Seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Orlows'cl. Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. McDonald: Mr. Chairman, 1'0 like to ma1re a motion t!1at WHEREAS, Henrietta Mormile ann Arthur and Marion Mormile are the owners of the property.lmmm and designated as SC1M# 1000--128--4-9 1'5, & 16 locateo on Peconic Bay Blvd; and . . Southold Town Planning Board 7 September 13, 1993 WHEREAS, this lot line change, to be known as lot line change for Henrietta Mormile and Arthur and Marion Mormile is for a lot line change to su':>tract 2,322 square feet from a 6,935 square foot parcel and add it to a 7,500 square foot parcel; and to su1:>tract 4,61.3 square feet from the same 6,935 square foot parcel and add it to a 1.0,648 square foot parcel, thus creating two parcels from three existing parcels. WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 61.7, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on March 22,. 1993; and WHEREAS, a final pu1:>lic hearing was closed on said lot line change application at the Town Hall, Southold, New Yor1<: on Septem1:>er 13, 1993; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Su1:>division Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and be it therefore, RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final appro-- val on the surveys dated November 9, 1.992 and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys su':>ject to fulfillment of the follOl.ing condition. This con-- dition must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution. 1. . The filing of ne'" deeds pertaining to the merger of the 7,377 square feet from the 6,935 square foot parcel sCTMff: 1000--128--4-1.5 with the 7,500 square foot parcel SCI'MfF 1.000--128--4-9 and the merger of the 4,613 square foot par-- eel from the 6,935 square foot parcel sCTMff: 1.000--128--4--1.5 with the 10,648 square foot parcel SCTMff: 1000-1.28--4--16. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McD:mald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Orlows'd, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. ******************** He ngs Held Over From Previous Meetings: Mr. Ward: Friemann & Others -- T'1is minor su1:>division is 19.596 acres locaL n the north side of Main Rd.; 1658.7 Lane in Cutchogue. The 'ect parcel is located i h the Agricultural Conservation (A--C) District an he General . ess (B) District. SCTMfF 1000--102--2--24. We had been i<ai ting a sponse between t'1e applicant's att-- orney and the Town attorney, hut I ~ th licant is here. Would you liKe to address the Board at all? Applicant: No, Mr. Ward: to hold o Based on this that they haven't gotten together, we 1. proceed hearing open until such time. Is there a motion to that effect? Mr. Edwards: So moved. . . RIchard G. Ward. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. BeMett Orlowski. Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOIT L. HARRIS Supervisor PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~ Town Hall. 53095 Main Road p. O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTH OLD Fax (516) 765 - 1823 August 10, 1993 RUdolph Bruer Edson & Bruer P.O. Box 1466 Southo1d, NY 11971 Re: Proposed lot line change for Henrietta Mormile and Arthur & Marion Mormile SCTM# 1000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Bruer: The fOllowing resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 9, 1993: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, September 13, 1993 at 7:40 P.M. for a final public ,.".., hearing on the maps dated November 9, 1992. . . IJCCZiA jj/~ U~/Ward Chairman LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Sec- tion 276 of the Town Law, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Towd Planning Board, at the Thwn Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 13th day of September, 1993 on the ques- lIon of the following: 7:30 P.M. Final approval of the lot line change for Jack & Margaret Stern, at Orient, in the Town of Southold, Coun- ty of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County lax Map Number 1000-17-2-1.3 The property is bordered on the north by land now or formerly of Chierchie and by land now or formerly of Stern; on the south by land now or formerly of Mahaffey; on the east by The Old Burying Ground, by land now or formerly of Dow, by land now or formerly of Stern Estate; on the west by land now or formerly of Lomas and by land now or formerly of Hahn. 7:35 P.M. Final approval of the lot line change for Lieb Vineyard, at Cutchogue, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number looo-73-I-p/o 3.1, looo-84-I-p/o 4, looo-84-I-p/o 2. The property is bordered on the northwest by Oregon Road; on the north by land now or formerly of the Socie- ty for the Propagation of the Faith; on the 110rtheast by land now or formerly of Asip; on the east by land now or formerly of McGuinnigle and by land now or formerly of Shalvey; on the south by land now or formerly of Julius Skire!. 7:40 P.M. Final approval of the set off for Henrietta Mor- mile and Arthur and Marion Mormile, at Laurel in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-128-4-9, 15 &16. The property is bordered on the north by land now or formerly of B. J. Silber, by land now or formerly of Margaret McGowan, by land now or formerly of A. Ralph and Valerie A. Bartolacci; on the west by land now or formerly Eric H. and Mary Ann Alexander; on the south by land now or formerly of Howard Brush, by land now or formerly of A. and J. Grassi, by land now or formerly Robert J. Kar; on the east by a sixteen (16) foot right of way owned by Joseph S. Connelly and wife. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the time and place specified. Dated: August 31, 1993. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Richard G. Ward Chairman I X-912/93 (9) CCUNTY OF SUFI JLK STAT[ OF NEW YORK 55: )atricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN " rublic newspapcr rrinted at Southold, in Suffolk County'; ,lnt! th;lt the nollce of which the annexed is ;1 printed cory hd~, heen Jluhlishcd in said Long Island Tr;lvL'lcr-W(llChrn<lr~ on:.:c each week for, . . , / . , . . . . . . . . . "",. , . ., weeks successively, commencing on the. , , , . . ~ .~..... ~4/F. /~ . ., C~~~~. 19.23. cJ av 01 o bA ~ ... ..~--:".. ")\'J(llil t () l) l~ll)ll' 111l' 1 i1:\ . c:l""/ d"y III ~~ --- -... ':"". , 1<) . 9..3 ~.Cl.-4~. , ..~~ r,~.)[MY f)ublic BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER NOTARY PUBLIC, S\;e!e of !:3W York No. liSOG:j~G QUalified in SuHcik County CommiSSion E,plles e/31/Q'( .1 '."."..-",,- ~ . Edson and Bruer ATIORNEYSAT LAW MAIN ROAD-P.O. BOX 1466 SOUTIlOLD, NEW YORK 11971 LEFFERTS P. EDSON (1912-1989) RUDOLPHH BRUER (516) 7Ci5-1111 (516) 7Ci5 2!iOO FAX: (516) 765-27!i2 July 12, 1993 HAND DELIVERED Planning Board Office Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd PO BOX 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 ATT: Richard G. Ward Re: Lot Line Change Mormille SCTM#I000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Ward: In reference to your letter dated July 9, 1993, enclosed please find five copies of the map showing the house on parcel SCTM#I000-128-4-16 that you requested. If you need any more information, please let me know. !5:ety., /II C:;(!Jt/1 ~ 1)lJ/tLU1- / udol~ H. Bruer RB/fg Ene. '''''''-1' li t.-:', r,~; 11 ;':,! ' . 'l"~"! 12 ! n . ,..-:~..",}.::,.~,'-:_", I ' !li'!1 (n:' !,' 1')1 3100'3 IU' vlL Iv~, i L. , . t~__'4'.'_" ., . SU BFI L.F:: .<?(../ . f s U BFI L.E: R.C v' Edson and Bruer ATIORNEYS AT LAW MAIN ROAD-P.O. BOX 1466 SOUTHOW, NEW YORK 11971 LEFFERTS P. EDSON (1912-1989) RUDOLPH lL BRUER (516) 765-1122 (516) 765 %500 FAX: (516) 765-%751 July 12, 1993 HAND DELIVERED Planning Board Office Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd PO BOX 1179 Southold, N. Y. 11971 ATT: Richard G. Ward Re: Lot Line Change Mormille SCTM#IOOO-128-4-9, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Ward: In reference to your letter dated July 9, 1993, enclosed please find five copies of the map showing the house on parcel SCTM#IOOO-128-4-16 that you requested. If you need any more information, please let me know. ........~. Sincerely . .' /1 /. /'.1,,, ..i! " II 1 / [I 1,.. '7' ,!. ).< K.i I I. , r.. ~" I\:..{,I' /. ,\' .', >'"I,e,. '.' '- ,'....'~... vr I.. i ~. , '\- , I udolph H. Bruer RB/fg Enc. -",,,,,,~,,,,,,,,,,,,,-,-,'~'.. .1 ,',,:,1 t_~, . . Gerard P. Goohringer, Chainnan Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Richard C. Wilton Telephone (516)765-1809 SCOT!' L. HARRIS Supervisor '5utf,Lh fl/ flL! , , . . ~- ~. \~( ~ '\ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS BOARD OF APPEALS , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 25, 1993 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 " ~1 I) i - ~' ~ Rudolph H. ,Bruer, Esq. Main Road ~ Box 1466 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Appl. No. 4174 - Mormile Readjustment of Substandard Lots Dear Rudy: Enclosed please find a copy of the findings and determination rendered by the Board of Appeals at our June 22, 1993 Regular Meeting. Please be sure to return to the Town Planning Board, Building Department and any other agency which may have jurisdiction in this project for issuance of other necessary approvals. We have furnished copies of this approval to the Building Department and Planning Board offices for their update and permanent recordkeeping concerning the issuance of the May 7, 1993 Notice of Disapproval. Also, since this project is located within 500 feet of the Great peconic Bay, a copy of this file has been referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning. Very truly yours, Linda Kowalski Enclosure Copy of Decision to: Building Department Planning Board ~ Suffolk County Department of Planning _ . --n-"';~~M'-"'-~'-"r...';;::'- ll) ~ II \'1 ~ 1 ill ~ ~) I, t. .L...~.:c"'"", :'., ~-'"._..,._--- , 1 ; i I ~ ~UN 2 8 1993 . ;.\ p; . > . . ';~-':-:,:;;,-, APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ,,'J~:;' '-'~. ;::- j~:>_~'_ /J~ ~ ~jjl rLl.1 ."J ~~~ -::-,' ,~..~""# va ">, )..~) /C.- ~ 7~ ~'} '" '" L:': ~ \, . :::> . ',,> ,"","'. Q' -',;". ~, ,'" ,~,_ f'.-" ~ 01 \-i "" ,S' L. tp, Pi \\ ",G '-l \~<;:>'.."'~..."" ~,\r \,-~....~., ~~j ~\"'" C Yc'lo./ ,ot. ..:;,.'S, <:r'f '~P'Y SCO'IT L. HARRIS Supervisor Gerard P. GoehJjnger, Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Richard C. Wilton Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O, Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Appl. No. 4174. ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Upon Application of HENRIETTA AND ARTHUR MORMILE. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IlIA, 100-30A.3, Bulk Schedule, for approval of nonconforming lot area of two parcels in the pending application for re-division of land. Location of Property: 270 Private Road *6, Laurel, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-128-4-9, 15, 16. Total area combined is approximately 23,000 sq. ft. WHEREAS, on May 7, 1993 a Notice of Disapproval was issued, by the Building Inspector concerning an application to re-separate and place a new division line for two parcels improved, each with a single-family dwelling; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 1993, an application for variances concerning lot area and width for each of the two parcels was filed; and WHEREAS, after due notice, a public hearing were held by the Board of Appeals on June 22, 1993, at which time all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following Findings of Fact: 1. This is an application concerning two parcels of land, all as shown on the November 9, 1992 survey map prepared by peconic Surveyors, P.C. submitted with this application: a) Parcell consists of a combined lot area of 12,113 sq. ft. - also referred to as Tax Map Nos. 9 and 15, Block 04, which is in the name of Henrietta Mormile. This lot area was combined inadvertently due to lack of continuous single-and-separate ownership. Page 2 - Appl. No. ~4 Matter of HENRIETTA & ARTHUR MORMILE Decision Rendered June 22, 1993 . b) Parcel 2 consists of a lot area of 15,261 sq. ft. - also referred to as County Tax Map No. 16 - which is owned by Arthur and Marian Mormile. 2. By this variance application, appellants are requesting permission to re-divide this 25,083 sq. ft. of land (to continue two lots) without an increase in lot density, by establishing a new lot line (shown as running South 15 degrees 47 minutes 50 seconds East 82.07 feet). The placement of this new lot line will alter the combined Tax Map Lot Nos. 9 and 15 from 12,113 sq. ft. to the proposed 9,822 sq. ft., and Tax Map Lot No. 16 will increase from its present size of 10,648 sq. ft. to 15,261 square feet. 3. This property is located in the R-40 Low-Density Residential Zone District which requires 40,000 sq. ft. of lot area per lot (Article III, Section 100-30A.3, Bulk Schedule applicable to the R-40 Zone District). Since the two lots are substandard in size as exists (before this proposed change in the lot division line), an area variance is required to reduce the lot area of one. Information has been submitted to show that these two lots (rather than three) were existing in single and separate ownership prior to zoning. Each of the two lots is improved with a single-family dwelling structure. 4. The percentage of relief sought by this application is applicable to Parcel 1 at 18 percent for a reduction in size from 12,113 sq. ft. to 9,822 sq. ft. -- or 2,291 sq. ft. less than the present lot size. Since this proposal is for an adjustment to increase Parcel 2 by the same difference, there is no increase in density or affect on the total area of the lots (combined total). 5. In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: (a) the relief as granted is not substantial in relation to lots established in the close vicinity of this property; (b) the circumstances are uniquely related to the property and there is no method feasible for appellant to pursue other than a variance; (c) the relief requested will not cause a substantial effect on available governmental facilities; (d) the variance will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience, or order of the town, or be adverse to neighboring properties .... ' frJ 'l,~ i Ij"!s; I ' . . rrn; I; . ~ 'f' , . ~ r f \l if I [Uff rl,l! I i I!!I rllli fiU; HIH;- i! t 11-; ."" "- IIII1 i i i ii ! 11 tJ i''' ?v I " ; Ii ~~@li !! ~ld[!! tl'ii ; !j, I . i ~ ~ ; ~ it, . '" t@ 'l'n 10 go . . c ;.....~z iJ:~ ....-< ~ 0 .-:;' tn "'" z ~ 1II tn . ~ ~ ~ ~ ii""" ~ It 0 ... ~~ . , o ~ 1<' r i , ! ' i A i . ~ I i 0 5 c 0 ... 0 ~ 0 r <> I' ..--..,.----rr- il,:I; ,!,I 'k,,"'Z':':'~i'~' - "7~~i"';;"'.--~ ~~,~,":""~'~:.l"~l:'.#~..,c;~:;'.. ~9.r" . ... t~t.::!t~:~2~Hi';~ ~~ I / , : '. ~ ~ ~ ........1: Ii .1.(.0:.......1. ~ I Ii I' i 'Ufew z !i 'J !~ ?'" , ! N' ii '011 _U~fIO HE IIC 1oO'1S .1>4.0" , .. .- .~ v <, II " " Ii r! il "" ....r II ,IO~t:'o ""C' " mm .:::: It ~Jl ~ :;: -" iiiril 8..;- II I I ; ! !" '~, , Ii I iii " urn :jij~ !iii! ~P:~! ...!.~ f: l!U; U;;f'- l'lll! U;il -r ..u.'~ '; '- 7T 't 0.. ~" :0: . :. . . ...... ~ ,.~CO~/C ,. -~ ~4- .. ~, . r . ,.. .-, z ~ ., " . !. I' P c c c I lL-=- I : ~ . , > . ~. ; ..,- . N i , (l) , ~ ..-..... ... a.. Page 3 - Appl. No. ,.,'4 Matter of HENRIETTA & ARTHUR MORMILE Decision Rendered June 22, 1993 . (e) the relief sought by applicant cannot be achieved by a method other than an area variance; (f) the proposed variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in this neighborhood or zone district - the new location of the division line is for record purposes and is not visible to the lands; (g) the difficulty is related to the uniqueness of the property and is not self-created; (h) the relief requested will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. (i) that in view of the manner in which the difficulties arose, and in considering all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the variance, as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Member Wilton, seconded by Member Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief as requested under Appeal No. 4174 in the Matter of ARTHUR & HENRIETTA MORMILE, for the re-adjustment of lot lines for two substandard parcels, shown as Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 on the survey map prepared by Peconic Surveyors, Inc. (dated November 9, 1992) plus amendment to show both existing dwellings. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Dinizio, Wilton and Villa. (Member Doyen was absent.) This resolution was duly adopted. * * * lk .//// / .'////,? /GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN ,. Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: SCTM 1000 - 128 - 04 - 009 and 015 Gentlemen: Please be advised that we are the co-executors of the Estate of Henrietta A. Mormile, fee owner of the subject premises. The estate is currently under contract to sell part of lot 15 to Arthur and Marian Mormile. Part of lot 15 will be merged with SCTM 1000 - 128 - 04 - 016 and the remaining property will be merged with SCTM 1000 - 128 - 04 - 009. We approve of said change. Very truly yours Ch~~~ Co-executrix of the Estate of Henrietta A. Mormile Sworn to before me this It{Ct;&;r~ 1992 Notary Public f(QB8l:f" H-AurN~ 1/ (,,.~ 10 "37"l- O).- 64-n- &-<""",<"1 ~ P MTA:'-'- c..t.uJf( ctp,Uf /I /30(7'{ tk/{4/ )~~~(L- Charles Mormile Co-executor of the Estate of Henrietta A. Mormile Sworn to before me this ,!,/{J. $Jh~ 1'1: - day,! of O{C., ,,~, 1992 <l~~ ~ Notary Public /Lo f~cJ..1 HAU N~ J./(PJt..311- 01.. l-IJ<\ ~v.AL(f(H~ }lJ!r.t....... L-aLoI"7'-( t";l(lfAel' u{!D/?i r -~j'~-~~:-~;'l-'-':>' iOO-..fLf:L ~ II I' ---". I aj ~lW - . s,o.:rn ;;::w rr-.~:~.~.~-' _. r. )':(,"1.\'3 f,C_' '.'n --r -"'; I - '. I i ! , , ."","",,,,,,"~:;~- " SUl'bnc...e- ;(/<. - ;v<{(,~~ EDSON & BRUER, ESQs. MAIN ROAD P.O. BOX 1466 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 [5163 765-1222/2500 '''.l~'..",,,U'\.' DATE 12/30/92 TO Southo1d Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 i Dear Bob: Pursuant to your request~ SUB..JECT Mormille, Arthur & Marian SCTMI000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 enclosed herewith please find Full Environmental Assessment FOrm. Also enclosed please find original letter of of adjacent property owner in support of the subject lot-line change. Please keep us advised as to the status 1 I i 1 m~~}-; rtlJ' "'i'-m-r.~ jJ _ ,J LS I, ". I I -.-, ,. . , In' tJu~ SUUTflo D "-'1- --, LANt'!i" ~ I" SIGNED i , ! ~ ! ~ .. _ ;~., aU'lL tOU'OUIlON . '00 S. SCHHIE~ ~o'o . l<HCOUSHI~I. IlliNOIS ~1IO" _._--"~.__. .~--~ - . . . . . ~ 1'''''''' \1 -=--71. I -1~'" . . (Xl . I N ~ t . ~ I I o ::::t-- \ Q= ~ 31It03.;", I o J o X 0 ... 0 5 Q, Ih l!I j ! . ; ~ , I ~ i J > u o . ~~ 2.~ : ~ ~ ii: V) CII;; Z u.. CI)~_: o ~...... >-1- ;;~. I- >- ~ : z t:V~ ::>. . o g ci U.t @1 '" ~ ~ :1:.. I ; ~ ; ! ~.~ ~"'~"'8 . 1 , L J 1 ;r;]: i 1;1 a.d'G i,';l -!-II ~Ini- ~iwa , ., i:li' 'j'.I !iih " a!;: b 5'~ , 'j r , 1 . , !I,J II "I"".X "I'"'' li~m . I." ;!~gi , HI J !Jlq IIIl> ii 7i@A& I ~ ~ 11 I '16441 I ~ ; , U.U 1f J ~ j IIII t ~ I I I I I iHJ !~ ""UjH 11 ~iJ !I'! Iii I I i . , !dJJ !! Ill, I tin d. 'J' ': "' WII ! """ ~/", 0.,.",0" ""~ "s !ll :r ~ ;~\ ~ ~ -J...J~ ,: I ,JO-IoO" n. 011 '~u UI ONlI)MH 110. .Jfji,....----...-.. .-l-----;li;;J....- UI"ON".nl ~ 'f , 0'1' . .'-1 i.H. j"j ..... ~ . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 July 9, 1993 Rudolph H. Bruer Edson & Bruer P.O. Box 1466 ~~ Southold, NY 11971 ~ iffi- RE: Lot Line Change for Henrietta Mormile and Arthur ~ Mormile SCTM#1000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 ,.,-' Dear Mr. Bruer: The Planning Board has received your letter of June 23, 1993, requesting final approval of the above referenced project. The Planning Board will require five copies of the map showing the house on parcel SCTM# 1000-128-4-16 before the Board can give any possible final approval. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. uz. ~d Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Thomas Fisher, Building Inspector . r Edson and Bruer ATIORNEYS AT LAW MAIN ROAD-P.O. BOX 1466 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 LEFFERTS P. EDSON (1912-1989) RUDOLPHH BRUER June 23, 1993 Planning Board Office Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd POBOX 1179 Southold, NY. 11971 Re: Proposed Lot Line Change for Henrietta Mormile SCTM# 1000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Ward: . (516) 765-1222 (516) 7651500 FAX: (516) 765-2752 Pursuant to your letter of February 17, 1993, a copy of which is enclosed, an area variance as described in your letter was applied for. The variance was granted by the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals on June 22, 1993. Please proceed to give final approval on this lot line change. If you need anything else, please let me know. Sincerely, 9~~ Rudolph H. Bruer RB4[) Enc cc: Bill Price Su~. K~ frO'" rrnj~ttIJLrn'" ' .IUJ '. II ri i L'!HF ') . i' , I. Ii' '," {" \"""",' , ~ t L",_ ! . . . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennell Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards scon L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 F~bruary 17, 1993 Rudolph H. Bruer Edson & Bruer P.O. Box 1466 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Lot Line Change for Henrietta Mormile and Arthur & Marian Mormile SCTM* 1000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Bruer: The deeds for lots number nine (9) and fifteen (15) for the above project are both in the name of Henrietta Mormile. As both lots are undersized for this Low Density Residential R-40 District, and are owned by the same person, the lots are considered merged by the Building Department and the Zoning Board of Appeals. Consequently, in order for this Board to give final approval on this lot line change, an area variance must be received from the Zoning Board of Appeals to further reduce the area of the nonconforming merged lot from 14,435 square feet to 9,822 square feet. A Notice of Disapproval from the Building Department will be needed to apply to the Board of Appeals for the variance. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact the Building Department at 765-1802. Very truly your~,/, .~~4jt/~ Richard G .~ard ~ Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector .. . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOlT L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Richard G. Ward, Chairman VI. FROM: RE: Proposed Lot Line Change for Henrietta Mormile SCTM# 1000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 DATE: June 18, 1993 Thank you for bringing to the Board's attention the fact that the map sent to you on the above referenced project does not show the second house. The Board is in favor of this lot line change which will make the non-conforming lots that have houses on them larger and eliminate the non-conforming vacant parcel. . . ~I!:FiU ff> .e./::... SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Richard C. Wilton Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Richard G. Ward, PB Chairman Valerie Scopaz, Sr. Planner FROM: ZB~ DATE: June 14, 1993 SUBJECT: Your File - Arthur & Marian Mormile 1000-128-4-9, 15, 16 We thought you would be interested to know that the map before you in the above matter attached to your March 23, 1993 SEQRA transmittal letter does not show the second house. On Friday, we requested and received the attached sketch prepared by the owner (c/o William Price, Jr., Esq.). A copy is furnished for your records and information/update. The public hearing advertising this matter will be held by the Board of Appeals on Tuesday, June 22, 1993, and we will accept written comments on or before that day. GG:lk . Ir ') S,\{J.y'p ~V\ [f . . '\ , o rn:~~:rnl~ c' [t '. :/.'1 '- t j._/ /' '/ jLf (-"U.Ll cC , j1..6W\ iP. i3 tL" 1 '~ 'y , TELEPHONE NUMBER: (516) 477-1016 FAX: (516) 477-0130 WILLIAM H. PRICE, JR;--" ATTORNEY AT LAW PO BOX 2065 GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 June 4, 1993 JUN 0 8 1993 ----------..... .........------....':'- Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. Edson & Bruer Main Road P.O. Box 1466 Southold, New York 11971 RE: MORMILE LOT LINE CHANGE Dear Rudy: Enclosed herewith please find copy of survey onto which Mr. Mormile has sketched the location of the dwelling on lot Lot 2. Mr. Mormile has advised me that the sketch is fairly accurate to scale. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. WHP/lmt enclosure q ,/,-:--~ " ..) '/:J ..-:' i:: . - .- . o ......' <;.. .'. Office Location: 828 Front Street, Greenport, New York 11944 ((,<<',' ~~~ \ ,->( o~ ,-.. - ~"'o......~ 4,Q' i t~'- ~VSv ~-B. 8< J. - ~ .l' ~ L,,-!Y~~ ~-?' 1'l/0/F~~ ;:. l.l4 O~ ~' ~. \. 1~'12'IO' e;. /()' .;?, ~O' ~ ~t c} " \ 1;;; ~. (j ~. / tV "'~. ~~ ~. ;~.\ .. "~~L,,O\,l l' %0 t, Vo ';;~ ~ ~t>.t~ ,~\o ~~ ~ % l.~ 0.:.... '" v "!t~,.o.o 'Z. ~ \V ,-." ,--'- ~ '" l( , t't' ,....(2) ~ ~ \~ ,k ~O ~ 0'- ~\O\-:St" .". t ~ _ ,~~ ~ co ~:o ~ .~. ~ ~ ~- 1:. ~ f.~r .". . t, 2"t. -::0-<. . ~"", ,. ,_ fl/ r~" ',e ~ _ aN J",I "e I'" ")> ~, OJ~ I~ tf:"'~ ~-=;;,~. ~..,.~~ ~ ,5,()l' , ... II .". 0 -..... 5 14.tlO 48 sq. . r' /,.;' 6 II . ~ ~ '0;' 10'261 sq. . .". ~ 6 \ \ ~rJllE 3- ~ \ FrrHtJ~ t.4l0Rt.4llE 'fI.~RlAl'I ~ ~ \- 1ooo-128~ 04~ 16 \ '4. &---- ~ ~ <p... ...~ 116.98' , . '/I: A 3- J. , S' 1~'1210 \ WOlF ASS1 ARO, G~ ZONING DISTRICT R 40' \. IF HO~ '\ \1'110 aRU:7" nCVA TIONS TO IISL. SHOWN THUS"f,.'ARe RCFCRCNCCO . . .', 119.05' 'tJ/O/F '" o '0 q -- .---.. . \ \ OWNm HENRICTT A A, MORMILC 31 BRCVOORT PLACC ROCKV1LLe CeNTRC, N. Y. . . -:n ~ \" ~ ~ .". -<. - .N ~ ~ ~ : ,// SURVEY OF PROPERTY FOR LOT L1tfE CHANGE' . A T LAUREL . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . SUFFOLK COUNTY. NY. o ~ 1000-128-04-09,15&16" ~ 1J:::;',~;9/D~.J-- ~{f ~,.J. ~t<A~ ~rn @rn O\Ylrg ~ JJt - 911I wftI. , .5. LIC. ~. ' P.C. . ,. . . , . 3.leJ:",lE'""" Posr 2,322 sf from a 6,935sf parcel & add to 7,500sf & from 6,935sf & add to 10 IMPOR.TANT >> File Nl..1mbe:r: N1-473800-00864 Use the above number in all cot~r'espondence about this actiOtl! To the Lead Agency: The above information confirms that filings on the described Negative Declaration were officiallY received by. and entered in the SEaR Repository on the daters) shown in the box headed DATE RECEIVED above. The date and time in the second line show when this document was printed. Please check the information above carefully. For corrections or questions contact Charles Lockrow, (518)457-2224, or write to: SEQR Repository NYSDEC Division of Regulatory Affairs 50 Wolf Road, Room 514 Albany, NY 12233 nl . I , Town of SOUTH OLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road-P.O. Southold, NY 11971 Box 1179 ~ro) i ~ @ m 0 W,J I r; ~ j li;'j' A"." 1901 LJ U I1I"ft .". ".1 SOUTHOLD TOI PLANNING BOAI;l'.. . 4~ )~~'V .~.'.. "I. ...._. - ~ '" /,..- ~ . => ' ;..: Q I.':. , ... r.n ': -,,': J ' :z: """.. ~ C=''''..' ~ ,~ ~ 110./ zjr i-'S ~ . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards scon L. HARRIS Supervisor Town HaiL 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 23, 1993 Rudolph H. Bruer Edson & Bruer P.O. Box 1466 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Lot Line change for Henrietta Mormile and Arthur & Marian Mormile SCTM~ 1000-128-4-9,15 & 16 Dear Mr. Bruer: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 22, 1993. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determine of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration on this Type I action. Enclosed find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours Richard G. Ward Chairman Encl. " . . . , . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 'State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance March 22, 1993 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementiRg regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed Lot Line Change for Henrietta Mormile and Arthur & Marian Mormile SCTM~: 1000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 Location: peconic Bay Blvd., Laurel SEQR Status: Type I Unlisted x ) ( ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes No ) X) Description of Action: This lot line change is to subtract 2,322 square feet from a 6,935 square foot parcel and add it to a 7,500 square foot parcel, and to subtract 4,613 square feet from the same 6,935 square foot parcel and add it to a 10,648 square foot parcel, thus creating two parcels from three existing parcels in Laurel. -~-,...- - '. . . .. ., I! Page 2 Henrietta Mormile and Arthur & Marian Mormile SEQR Negative Declaration Con't. Reasons Supporting This Determination: This project involves a lot line change that will result in two lots both with existing houses being created from three existing parcels; thus the change will not be a more intensive use of the land. All three lots are non-conforming in area. The applicant has applied to the Board of Appeals for an area variance. This change will increase the size of the two surviving lots in this R-40 zone in keeping with zoning in this area. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and site details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) and the required obtainment of the relevant permits. An Environmental Assessment has been submitted and reviewed. It was determined that no significant effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services commissioner, NYSDEC, Albany Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Zoning Board of Appeals Applicant - L._ -- . . S01o~ . Fib R"" WILLIAM H. PRICE, JR. ATIORNEY AT LAW 828 Front Street PO Box 2065 Greenport, New York 11944 Telephone Number (516) 477-1016 Fax Number (516) 477-0130 February 26, 1993 Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. Edson & Bruer P.O. Box 1466 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mormile Lot Line Chan~e Dear Rudy: Richard Ward VS in his letter of February 17, 1993 is absolutely correct. Tax Map lots 15 & 16 are owned by the same person. It is as clear as mud to me why it is required that where you have two (2) non-complying lots (A. Mormile and H. Mormile) and a lot line change is requested which, if granted, will result in two (2) non-complying lots of the same composite area, that a variance is needed because one of the non-complying lots, by the laws of physics, must be, thereafter be smaller and the other lot larger. I am merely surprised that the fact that the one lot that is being expanded does not also need a separate variance because its size and configuration make it more in conformity with the zoning code. It is even clearer to me why the Planning Board does not consider this an unnecessary hardship and grant a vari- ance from the strict compliance with the regulations under Article V of Chapter 106. It is perfectly clear to me why a lot line change should require three or four trips to the Town Hall or appearances before various boards and six or seven months to change two lots into two lots with a different boundary line. I truly appreciate your efforts in this matter. I will contact Mr. A. Mormile and let him know of the status. I am sure he will be ecstatic. ~ William H. Price, II. cc. G. Goehringer R. Ward V. Lessard MORMILBIILE"rrEKSII993 .\~tr~' . 'j '(103 l\l\l tAAR - ,) bJ SV PI;" w :J-Jt-i]~1 ~ fi~~ 1t:' . ~ tN ,~ ~ '/fck; 1 jJ~ --'r! J. ~-"~ . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Richard G. Ward, Chairman K~K1/vS Pending Lot-Line Changes that require action by the Board of Appeals February 26, 1993 From: FE: Date: As requested, following pending at the Planning of Appeals. is a list of Lot-Line applications Board that requires action by the Board SCTMlI 1000-6-2-5 & 6 Name John S. McGeeney & Edward F. Rodenbach, Trus. 1000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 Henrietta A. Mormile & Arthur & Marian Mormile PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards -. ",;p;a=c>>" ,o1~~\>:.,.'.,jfFO, iI(, tl ~ .,~. 'Y'-"v .' a /"~"J ' , ~ il ~ /, " :;A ,) 5/0'"-.. ="" . en . i" 1" ::oe . ~\',.1} ~ ,!~.l:r:, i-~ -c<~.- . SCOlT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 17, 1993 Rudolph H. Bruer Edson & Bruer P.O. Box 1466 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Lot Line Change for Henrietta Mormile and Arthur & Marian Mormile SCTMi 1000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Bruer: The deeds for lots number nine (9) and fifteen (15) for the above project are both in the name of Henrietta Mormile. As both lots are undersized for this Low Density Residential R-40 District, and are owned by the same person, the lots are considered merged by the Building Department and the Zoning Board of Appeals. Consequently, in order for this Board to give final approval on this lot line change, an area variance must be received from the Zoning Board of Appeals to further reduce the area of the nonconforming merged lot from 14,435 square feet to 9,822 square feet. A Notice of Disapproval from the Building Department will be needed to apply to the Board of Appeals for the variance. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact the Building Department at 765-1802. Very truly your~, /' ~~4#~ Richard G /~ard ~ Chairman cc: ,Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector 't r,r;:7~':C- . p;;'~\lfFDl.t ~~ fff'.% \; ;~i,~. .. ..~~ ~I?./ .{lr i' ~ SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 F~bruary 17, 1993 Rudolph H. Bruer Edson & Bruer P.O. Box 1466 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Lot Line Change for Henrietta Mormile and Arthur & Marian Mormile SCTM* 1000-128-4-9, 15 & 10 Dear Mr. Bruer: The deeds for lots number nine (9) and fifteen (15) for the above project are both in the name of Henrietta Mormile. As both lots are undersized for this Low Density Residential R-40 District, and are owned by the same person, the lots are considered merged by the Building Department and the Zoning Board of Appeals. Consequently, in order for this Board to give final approval on this lot line change, an area variance must be received from the Zoning Board of Appeals to further reduce the area of the nonconforming merged lot from 14,435 square feet to 9,822 square feet. A Notice of Disapproval from the Building Department will be needed to apply to the Board of Appeals for the variance. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact the Building Department at 765-1802. Very truly your~,~ ~~ 4. Jt/~ Richard G.~ard ~ Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector . -. c '\JrFCl" ,-, f (":.~ "'I-'l C/"-'\,;){I" ~a:,_ c, N" ~, 'iY~,',,'_:, ',',_ '-:;:',"',' V. .::)_~;.r }t. ,- _ - --::.t\ 10 ; _ .:,..- - ') \cn ":~" =e fI ~ \~. h~ t:!! ::; V"..',."- _ ~:Y ~,'<' ....0' .' "'--" " .:.." <, . ~~r-'J . '.'O./ ,'L ....'0,-'1 ,_~ .':'J' "{if <'b--~-. I . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards . SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 F~bruary 9, 1993 Rudolph H. Bruer Edson & Bruer Main Road P.O. Box 1466 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Lot Line Change for Henrietta A. Mormile and Arthur & Marian Mormile SCTM~1000-128-4-9,15 & 16 Dear Mr. Bruer: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 8, 1993. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, established itself as lead agency. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, 1(r'c4w1 ~ 1r/~ Richard G. Ward ~ Chairman cc: victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals ....r . . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK $U~l I- RK Pb ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HIBBERD. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER January 11, 1993 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Town Hall - 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New Yor!< 11971 RE: Lot-Line Mormile SCTM #: 1000-128-04-015 '. \ ~ n ; i:\ i.J) i lULL JAN I_~__,--l ; C'O"e"CIID""" I u "". I Pl'\'''''' )l:~~ ._-_.~- Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Deparunent of Health Services (SCDHS) bas received your letter dated December 16, 1992, concerning the above-referenced application, and bas no objection to the Town's designation as lead agency. 1his correspondence is intended primarily to expedite tbe procedural requirements of SBQRA pertaining to the establishment of lead agency. The comments provided below are, therefore, general in nature, representing several of our most common concerns regarding Suffolk County projects. The department wishes, however, to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s) establisbed for this action. I. Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) 1. The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems, pursuant to the authority and requirements of Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the SCSC. Applications must comply with all relevant density and construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Applicants should not undertake the construction of, or connection to, either system without Health Deparunent approval. 2. Where applicable, the department regulates the storage, handling and discharge of restricted toxic and hazardous materials pursuant to the requirements of Articles 7 & 12 of the SCSC. 3. If an application has not yet been submitted to the SCDHS, one should be filed at the earliest date to allow for the technical review of the proposed action. Project designs submitted to the deparunent should be fully consistent with any action currently nnder review through the SBQRA process. 4. Design and flow specifications, information regarding subsurface soil conditions, water supply information, and complete design details are essential to the review of this project, and are evaluated fully at the time of application review. Should the town require additional environmental information (such as a DBIS), discussion of the compliance requirements of the SCDHS should be required. 5. Of particular concern to the deparunent are those areas which because of elevated groundwater conditions, or soils which are not conducive to the proper functioning of conventional subsurface sanitary sewage disposal systems. Your agency should be aware that such conditions frequently require the use of fill or the excavation of subsurface soils to accommodate subsurface sanitary disposal systems constructed in conformance with the requirements of tbe SCSe. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-3397 852-2100 . . Letter to Bennett Orlowski, Jf. January 11, 1993 Page 2 . 6. The department is also significantly concerned with areas where access to potable water may be constrained by unacceptable groundwater quality and the lack of an available public water supply. All private water supply systems must be constructed in conformance with requirements of the sesC. II. NATURAL RESOURCES: 1. The SCDHS fully supports all efforts to maximize protection of natural resources which may be impacted upon by construction and development activities. It is the position of the department that the SEQRA review process provides the greatest opportunity for comprehensive consideration of these resources, and that all practicable planning measures should be employed to help ensure their protection. Of particular concern to department is the adequate protection of wetlands, surface waters, natural communities, contiguous natural habitats, and rare, threatened and endangered species. In addition, efforts to protect sensitive physical resources such groundwaters, dunes, bluffS, shorelines, natural drainage channels, groundwater recharge areas, and steep slopes are fully supported and encouraged by the SCDHS. In general, the department encourages the following land use measures be considered (where appropriate) to actions being reviewed pursuant to SEQRA. 1. Maximum practicable setbacks from all wetlands, surface waters, dunes, and bluffs. 2. Non-disturbance buffers between wetland limits and required structural setbacks. 3. Clustering of subdivision lots to provide for maximum preservation of large contiguous areas of dedicated open space. 4. Stringent clearing limitations which can reduce potential impacts to wildlife habitats, vegetative communities, and unconsolidated soils. 5. Maximum practicable confinement of development to areas with slopes of less than 10%. 6. Maximum use of native species for land~caping purposes. 7. Construction of recharge areas, so as to minimize the amount of disturbance and structural modification to the site. 8. Maximum use of land-banked parldng on commercial sites. 9. Minimal use of fertilizer-dependant turf and landscaping. 10. Employment of stormwater runoff control measures necessary to maintain runoff on-site. The department appreciates the opportunity to participate in the SEQRA review of this proposal. Additional information may be provided prior to the close of the established comment period. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078. ;;;;:;~~ Mark J. Reuschle Environmental Planner Office of Ecology MJR{amf cc: Vito Minei, P.E. Stephen Costa, P .E. ~ . . ....,. . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards scon L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 i'lEMORANDUM FROM: James Richter, Road Inspector Richard G. Ward, Chairman (CtAtl(,;S TO: RE: Review of Short Environmental Assessment Form Proposed Lot Line change for Henrietta Mormile & Arthur & Marian Mormile peconic Bay Blvd. Laurel SCTM~ 1000-128-4-15 DATE: January 5, 1993 Please complete part two of the attached SEAF. If you have any questions, please contact Robert Kassner of this office. Ene. cc: Raymond Jacobs, Highway Superintendent SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: CO!1MENTS : . .. SUBMISSION WITHOU~ COVER LETTER .- IIP~ ~HUL~ /.J...;--'--I-7, I~--I-/b 0~ . .' 3A-eFiiE RIC- .J peH.v~ ""f .~..~ .--' ., , 'DSON & BRUER, ESQ. MAIN ROAD P.O, BOX 1466 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 [516J 765-1222/2500 , StUOnc..€ / tel<- -!"'(6.r . " "f",' ..~'''..-_,''.._.._.~....."....{ >;......"..,,,~~......,.,,_. ~"''''''-,,--,,'''. :"/-,..._.,."--,,*,,,,-,..,......,:,,,. -,." ..". '" ~.,.,' .;"~.,...-,-_.,,. DATE 12/30/92 10 Southold Town Planning Board ~;UB JECT Mormille, Arthur & Marian SCTMI000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 Main Road Southold, ~ 11971 1_ Dear Bob: Pursuant to your request, enclosed herewith please find Full Environmental Assessment FOrm. Also enclosed please find original letter of of adjacent property owner in support of the subject lot-line change. Please keep us advised as to the status wt~=: II w ~ f. SOUTfio D~ LAN II ''::;0 700-45331 OOSTRIBUltv@'GUlllCORPOUIlON. 100 S. SCHHI(~ ROAO . lINCOlNSHI~E, IlliNOIS 600~9 . . Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: SCTM 1000 - 128 - 04 - 009 and 015 Gentlemen: Please be advised that we are the co-executors of the Estate of Henrietta A. Mormile, fee owner of the subject premises. The estate is currently under contract to sell part of lot 15 to Arthur and Marian Mormile. Part of lot 15 will be merged with SCTM 1000 - 128 - 04 - 016 and the remaining property will be merged with SCTM 1000 - 128 - 04 - 009. We approve of said change. Very truly yours Ch~~~ Co-executrix of the Estate of Henrietta A. Mormile Sworn to before me this '1Cl;&,r~ 1992 Notary Public 1(QBBif H-Aur~ 4(,,"3 (., ~ 7"1- 0).- M-n- &<-<"1..,,,,<1 ~ ,J/~rA:'-'- ~r.y ~Pltcr 1/ 3ol7'f ~~ Charles Mormile Co-executor of the Estate of Henrietta A. Mormile Sworn to before me this /t(fU <i~~2 Notary Public 1-o~l.T HAt.lN~ J./(p3f.,312-- 02- HI<\ ~'--'AL"(H~ p./jr.tA.... Loc....rTY t"jlfl/Aer U('$o(?<( rDl m fe! ~Jf~ =~ r~~.:n,l,I,>:~:~~\ " " " , --__N,...I ',14-16-2 (2/87)-7c . . '"'a " n 1,< U,if' SEQR 617.21 Appendix A 'lr;~ ,--4' r State Environmental Quality Review is' Uli FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT F R f:~'c;;';-'" c j The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an -anner, whet1-;er a project Purpose: or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 0 Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magi tude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: o A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. o B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared. * o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions I/- r~u V Ho Y' tYll lie. Name of Action Name of lead Agency Print or Type Name of Re<ponsible Officer in lead Agency Title of ResponSible Olticer Signature of Responsible Officer in lead Agency Signature of Pre parer (If different from responsible officer) Date 1 . · PART 1-PROJECT INFORMATION ... Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: ThiSdocument is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Off Peconic Bav Blvd., Laurel, New York NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR T BUSINESS TELEPHONE Mormile. Arthur and Marian ( ) ADDRESS 31 Brevoort Place CITY/PO I STATE I ZIP CODE Rockville Centre NY 11570 NAME OF OWNER (If different) T BUSINESS TELEPHONE same ( ) ADDRESS CITY/PO I STATE T ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Merge SCTM :[000-128-04-015 with SCTM 1000-128-04-16 with lot line change - - Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: DUrban Dlndustrial DCommercial KlResidential (suburban) DForest DAgriculture DOther DRural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards. cropland. pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECl) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: otwell drained 100 % of site DPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? DYes lONo a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) .75+ acres. PRESENTL Y n/a acres AFTER COMPLETION n/a acres n /~ n/a acres n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a acres acres acres n /R n/a n/a n/a n/a acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres DModerately well drained % of site 2 ,5. Approximate percentage of!posed project site with slopes: 1Kl0-1. 0-10 % 010-15% % % 9. 10. 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, Registers of Historic Places? DYes aNo 7, Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 8, What is the depth of the water table? 20:!: (in feet) Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes lONo Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes IKJNo According to Identify each species Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) DYes IXINo Describe 015% or greater site, or district, listed on the State or the National DYes KlNo DYes lONo 11. 12. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes IXINo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes GlINo ' 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: nf a a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name nfa b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? XJYes DNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? J[]Yes DNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection' DYes lONo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? DYes XJNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECl, and 6 NYCRR 617? DYes lONo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes KJNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0 b. Project acreage to be developed: nf a acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped n/ a acres. d. length of project, in miles: nf a (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion. indicate percent of expansion proposed nf a f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing nf a ; proposed nf a g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour nf a (upon completion of project)? h. I f residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family One acres. acres ultimately. %;. Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately One i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure nfa height; nfa j. linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? width; n/i nfa ft. length. 3 . 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes DNo l{JN/A a. If yes, for what intend,~ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes . n/a tons/cubic yards DNo 4. How many acres of vegetation [trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? nl a acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes KJNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction n I ~ 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated n/a (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 n I ~ month c. Approximate completion date of final phase nl a month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? DYes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes I1!INo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction nl a Number of jobs eliminated by this project nl a Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? months, (including demolition). n/a n/a lONo year, [including demolition). year. ; after project is complete 10. 11. DYes 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes !iCJNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? DYes ~No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes lDNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes UNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes DNo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes XONo e. If Yes, explain lONo If yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes KlNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes UNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes KlNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes lONo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity nl a gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day n/a gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? DYes l[]No If Yes, explain DYes UNo 4 c. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [JJYes DNo. If Yes, indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment Dzoning variance Dspecial use permit Dsubdivision Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan . .I[]other Lot line R-40 25. Approvals Required: . City, Town, Village Board City. Town, Village Planning Board City, Town Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies . Type 5ubmittal Date DYes DIINo DYes rnNo DYes lONo ~, DYes JPNo DYes JPNo DYes flNo DYes UNo DYes J(]No Dsite plan change 2. What is the zoning c1assification(s)of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? N/A 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Residential 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? roYes DNo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a V. mile radius of proposed action? Residential 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V. mile? IlOYes DNo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N / A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes UNo 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection]? DYes UNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes DNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? DYes IlONo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes DNo. D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certiiy that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Spolor Name Arthur Mormile Date 12/30 /92 Signature --tl~~;I/~ ~ Title Aoolicant/Soonsor If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2"OJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR !AGNITUDE Responsibility 01 Lead Agency General Inlormation (Read Carelully) . In completing the lorm the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. . Identilying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily signilicant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine signilicance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicabl~ throughout the State and for most situations. But, lor any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate lor a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. . The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therelore, the examples are illustrative and have been ollered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. . The number 01 examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question: . In identilying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative ellects. Instructions (Read carelully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes il there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. II answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size 01 the impact. II impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. II impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. II reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. II a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 loot rise per 100 loot ollengthl, or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. . Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. . Construction 01 paved parking area lor 1,000 or more vehicles. . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet 01 existing ground surface. . Construction that will continue lor more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. . Excavation lor mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons 01 natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. . Construction or expansion 01 a sanitary landlill. . Construction in a designated fJoodway. . Other impacts 2. Will there be an ellectt,- ...IY u";que or unusual land forms found on the SIte? (i.e., c1ifls. dunes, geologicallormations. etc.)DNO DYES . Specilic land forms: . IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation law, ECl) DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Developable area of site contains a protected water body. . Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. . Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. . Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. . Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. . Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. . Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action wi!l_require a discharge permit. . Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. . Proposed Action reql!ires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. . Construction or operation ci:using any contamination of a water supply system. . Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. . liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. . Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. . Proposed Action will like!v cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to If,e extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. . Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. . Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. . Proposed Action locates comrrlercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. . Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage ilow or patterns, or surface water runoff? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo .. 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo - 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo - 0 0 DYes. ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo . o Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. o Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. o Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. o Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. o Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. o Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 Ibs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. o Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. o Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. o Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. o Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. . Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. o Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. o Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 . 1 2 3' Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large MItigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 - DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo . . Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. o The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. o The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? DNO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. o Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. . Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. o Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. o Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. . Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. o Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 DNO DYES . The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. . A major reduction of an open space important to the community. o Other impacts: 9 . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo - D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo . . 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? DNa DYES 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 D- OVes DNo 0 - 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes .DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNO 0 0 DVes DNo IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? DNa DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. . Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supplv? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. . Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. . Other impacts; NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? DNa DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. . Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). . Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. . Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. . Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) . Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of Iiquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. . Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wa~le. . Othpr impacts: 10 . . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 - 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 .0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project. is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. . The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. . Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. . Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. . Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. . Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) . Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. . Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. . Other impacts: 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? DNa DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 musl be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered 10 be potentially large, even if Ihe impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance. consider: . The probability of the impact occurring . The duration of the impact . Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value . Whether the impact can or will be controlled . The regional consequence of the impact . Its potential divergence from local needs and goals . Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 14.14.11 (2187)-9<: . 617.21 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum . SEaR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: . A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? . An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? . A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? . State Parks? . The State Forest Preserve? . National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? . National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? . National Park Service lands? . Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? . Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? . A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter.county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? . A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? . Municipal park, or designated open space? . County road? . State? . Local road? Distance Between Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-'/. V..lh '12.3 3.5 5+ o 0 000 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0-- 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (Le., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) DYes ONo 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? DYes ONo 1 . . DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question I, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *'/. mile * 1 mile Essentially undeveloped Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial Commercial Urban River, Lake, Pond Cliffs, Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed o o o o o o o o D- O o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 5. Are there visually similar projects within: "'/2 mile DYes ONo "I miles DYes ONo "2 miles DYes ONo "3 miles DYes ONo " Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is Activity Travel to and from work Involved in recreational activities Routine travel by residents At a residence At worksite Other Daily o o o o o o Weekly o o o o o o FREQUENCY Holidaysl Weekends o o o o o o Seasonally . o o o o o o 2 . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK . $U8PiLlZ" (>6 RK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING December 22, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Plat Name: Henrietta A. Mormile Tax Map No.: 1000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 SCDP File No.: S-SD-92-08 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Pursuant to the requirements of Section AI4-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the above captioned proposed final plat which has been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination; however, this shall not be construed that the Commission has either approved or disapproved this particular plat. Comments: 1. All stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of this subdivision or any of its lots should be retained on the site by adequate drainage structures so that it will not flow into Great Peconic Bay. 2. The private road (RoO.W.) that serves as access for this property should be brought up to Town standards for safety purposes. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning Sls Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY ,,,___>=,,~".._'L".:."'-;::',"'_~:_.:-' 1'10::-\ p. ~ f~ II ii' I~ i I D I ,~~;o2-:,^"'...'", " :~.} ~ iln1; DEe 24 Igo? IIUi"~"- ! L._-. HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11786 . '(516)853-5192 \ FD:mb H. LEE DENNISON BUILDING . . . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 ~, (0 J 19 '1'1- RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a Environmental Assessment Fo / Project Name: Requested Action: ;J. .A:t SEQRA Classification: (;<) Type I ( ) UnUsted Contact Person: (e~(i~5~1fQ'1j6A. . . The lead agency will determine the impact statement (EIS) on this project. the date of this letter, please respond have an interest in being lead agency. need for an environmental Within thirty (30) days of in writing whether or not you Planning Board Position: l)\) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. l Other. l See comments below). Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. @U::;;;;;;~lA Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Boar4 of ~pp~QIs ~Board of Trustees Building" Department Southold Town Board 1rSuffolk County Dept. of Health Services tNYSDEC - Stony Brook W/",sDEC - Albany S- (' Dept. of FubJ.-i.c-Wor"*s- U. G. A.LUlY \...ULp of t;ngineers. N v a. ~gpt.~f-TransPcrrtation * Maps are enclosed for your_~eview Coordinating agencies r. ,..., "- . 617.21 Appendix C.""' .. State Environmental Quality Review, SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS ()?!y ,C', PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor)l i__._" ,.._-,,--J , 14.16-4 (2JSn- Text 12 PROJECT 1.0, NUMBER SEaR l.~_' 1. APPLICANT ISPONSOR I 2. PROJECT NAME ! "'..'~ ,;~:.: 1.;:~ :\~J pi r..', :; Arthur Mormile and Marian '1", 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Laurel County Southold 4. PRECISE lOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) SCTM #1000 - 128 - 04 - 015 Off Peconic Bay Blvd. , Laurel, New York 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: o New o Expansion XX Modificationfalteratlon Lot Line Change 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Merge SCTM 1000-128-04-015 with SCTM 1000-128-04-16 with lot line change 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initlally acres Ultimately acres 8, WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? g] Ve. DNo If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT is PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? gj Residential o Industrial o Commercial o Agriculture o Park/Forest/Open space OOthe, Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? OVe. fiNo If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTIOU HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ,DVe. liht.o If ye::, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITfAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? OVe. IXI No I CERTIFV THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MV KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Arthur Mormile Date; J~,a.qg., rt I /h1/Jl~t/tI!./ Signature: /J .:f/i1/1) , If the action Is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 .... PART II-ENVIRONMENTAL AS MENT (To be completed by Agency) ..' A. DOES ACTION ExceeD ANY TYPE I "l1ESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.121 If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. DVes DNa B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.61 "No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. DVes DNa C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY AOVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, If legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or grOUndwater quality or quantity, noise levels. existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal. potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl.CS? Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type ot energy)? Explain briefly. o. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? DYes 0 No If Yes, explain briefly , . PART III-DETERMINATION OFSIGNIF.ICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For e"ach adverse effect identified above determine whether it is substantial,large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (3) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of Occurring; (c) duration; (d) Irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain ,sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. o Check !hls box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. :rhen proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. o Check this box if you h"ve determined, based on the Information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental Impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary. the'reasons supporting this determination: Name oi lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible OHicer In lead Agency ,-J Title of ResponSIble Officer SIgnature of Responsible Officer in lead ^gency . Signature of Preparer (If different. from responsIble officer} Date 2 , / . /"-rJ/x,J;'.~.. ><-'-.... 'fJf'~ 'iyJ~",\\fFDl.t ~ ~ JiY$)'\; ~'\,. jU'~ ~ ~ ij" ::J ...:. " I- Q . ~ N ~'" . f "'" ,~ \Joo:: '. t',' r'r7 (1' '.~ '_;"_ ~ t . i:::>, .~~, , ",.~ '~'J~-0; ";'.;_ . ~'i><,'" ,0' '''?''-. ~. .'"... ~ .,r(;V' '<--~:::'):;;;;~I:-uJ0J)' . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOIT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765,1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD Fax (516) 765,1823 Tb~ ./ 1/ . , ,19 <J~ Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to ~e Suffolk Cgyn~y Pla~~ng COmmission:t. (~fi~l?l~Rji~~ -I Map of -~.J. ~~ ~4 Hamlet/Locality ~ S.C.D.P.W. Topo No.: ZOning~)J~: tfOH~-I (~4:) S.C. Tax Map No.: !O()O j-2! - # - 7, IJ-J-/6 ~T-~~~ . Major Sub. Minor Sub. ~ Site Plan Cluster MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Preliminary Plat (3 copies) ~d Profiles (1) Drainage Plans (1) ___Topogroaphical Map (1) Site Plan (1) ___ Grading Plan (1) ____ Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet ~ CONTINUED >~~~~ . . REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an (Unlisted) (Type I) (Type II)Action. 2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes) (No). 4. The proposed S.C. Dept of division has received approval :2 :s)~(:~ from the '... (--...,)<.Jf We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) (No) Referral received by Suffolk County and assigned File 19 Planning Commission NO. ~J:U J. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. X" Chairman . ~...., ~", -"'-~.' , . . . SouthOld Town Planning Board To\~n Hall SouthOld, New York 11971 Re: Gentlemen: The fOllowing statements are offered for your consiaeration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. .. (2) No new roads ~re proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. .."- Yours truly, Arthur Mormile ~dt14J $:CYVl!1;~-. ..v~. - , .. . ~; .. . .,t;:;:;L:Z:;:.:>:c:-'-.'",...., .~).~\ifFO{lr~i.~ ", ".-..., _:' ,"' <, :'..($ ,'"'" " ~>4 :~,.' ,'-::' ,- .' '- ~ \\ ;j' ,~r ,,'j ~ ~~ ; "';) r" tre: ~ '. ,. . '" ~"'~- l,' ~ '." ,:-. ~ .. ' "-.-,,,,(,1 ~ '.,'~... -,--'0....) '", /0./ ,'f.. ~~(>:ov ~cP' . PLANN[NG BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDona[d Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-[938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box [[79 Southo[d. New York [[971 Fax (516) 765-[823 December 15, 1992 Rudolph H. Bruer Edson & Bruer P.O. Box 1466 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Lot Line Change for Henrietta Mormile and Arthur & Marian Mormile SCTM#1000-128-4-9, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Bruer: The fOllowing resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 14, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, start the lead agency coordination process on this Type I action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, ~~'t2v:/~ ~~~ett Orlowski, -Jr. ,,'- Chairman . . f'b -~ I<K. V . /'15 SufJFttf ~ ~~ ~ fJ84<<<M' ....TTORNEYSATLAW MAIN ROAD. P.O. BOX 1466 SDUTHOLD. NEW YORK 11971 LEF'F'ERT5 P. EDSON 119 t 2.1989) RUDOLPH H. BRUER (S 16) 765-1222 (516) 765-2500 FAX: (516) 765-2752 December 7, 1992 Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Lot Line Change Mormile, Arthbr and Marian SCTM#1000 - 128 - 04 - 09, 15 and 16 che-R: t,....." C~"'^-4- Dear Sirs: Enclosed herewith please find: 1. Executed and notarized letter of Arthur Mormile stating reason for and approval of lot line change and statement that property will be merged upon approval; 2. Form letter regarding drainage, roads and grading; 3. Short Environmental Assessment Form, Part I; 4. Application for Approval of Plat, together with copies of deed to the subject parcels; 5. Questionnaire; 6. Eight copies of lot line change map prepared by Peconic Surveyors, and 7. My check in the sum of $50.00 payable to your order representing the filing fee. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. --"-1 V:J r-.......... ~ rn @ [2 n \lil ~ , ,0.' , , Ir, U \'J _:~.__" < - \ n c.. -..... . U lr-~"-"- \ \1\1 nEe - 8 \992 i lH.', , d i ~._..,.,_,......_~ -_....-.~..~..~ ':. - ., -.. ~"T'...,"'" ~L':<;":'! .;':'~:'<: <,._,-:) ~. 6~ ~i*-~ f< ~. ~~'t ~, . ,0 of5 , . ,,0 ,,:>C?l ~". ~. <<:~ I . l>~.. ...~ -tI-/ ..., -- 4. ,,.,.. , e<<"'~ ". 19J4----"", \ "~ D~,J' ~ 4~2'lo" 'II. 8 sq. It, 5.1 64 It ,0, 61 sq, ' 15,2 \ &~E' tA~JVI":':E ,AR1~N ~ t.AA ^A._16 128- U"" 10<>0-' @ .J- { ~. ~~/ ~ .J~ r ~ ,..,' ~ ~ ~ ~ .orb' b. .,0'1< 4 QJ c,', 'l,o' t uO q,~ 'Z. - o - "'" \ ';t. 9.0 \ -<. '> '? ' ~~ \I) 'u, ~ o. m~ ''')<. '> ~ ~ OWNeR HCNRleTT A A. MORMILe 31 BReVOORT PLACe ROCKVILLe CeNTRe, N. Y. ~\ 'tcJ} ..~ \~. ,./ ~ ~~o" ~ oJ ., '.; \~ ~tf <Ij ~'> ~ ~' 't. ~ O~<<-~~ ~~~ O. E, 14.12') N. Pb \ ~<6 \ V\V\ \ .o-,? i!l '770 ~ '.:::::.J -\ 0 -\ . \~ m ~~o \ ' -tib~~ J ~'}- NIO/fst~ . ~oU\ '" ii--- \\~ . . \"~ '~14&j2'O'-' -.,. S '~. 116.98' ,J. , s. 14'1~1: \ Nlo'Jp.tssl W/V'- ' ZONING DISTRICT R 40' \ NI0/f ~ \ ELEVA nONS SHOWN THUS'21,'ARE REFERENCED \ TO MSL. - NI0/f ------ \ \ \ l ~ ~ V\ -\ ~~ .... ~~ t'\ ~ . -<. - cfa , \ ~oO'\ ()8!ftl J. Rt(AR ------ IV ~ /V \ SITe ~, 7,1 ;1 7/ vi f '/1 ~ ~ /; ,$"<0" 1) ~ SURVEY OF PROPERTY FOR LOT LINE CHANGE' A T'LAUREL . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNT~ N. r: 1000 - 728 - (U - 09,15 iff 16 Scale: 1" = 40' Nov. 9,1992 I I ~ . ,~ 1 l ."; ..i~ IW ~. "I;F';~, '<:, o' ',n i L!; UD L~ ii .."~.i D ~.---'_.. n "'" 2 8 1993 , J , ~ i ! SOUTHOLD TOWN PlANNING BOARD , . l' t l' . Y.S. Lie. NO. 49618 (. P. . UA#/ ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 1/971 , -- ~. ~ .... ~ ,\~cj, ~ .Orb'!' b- ,,->0 'V .)- Q)' <,', ",0' f CJO q,~ ~. &;~~ oQ~ ~~i-~ f< ~. ~~'t 1500.\ ~~~\ . -~~-i>~ F S 8& J. ~? N/OI silBER ~ '., 14'IZ'10' E. / ,,~V(} '~J;'...;:~p:.:; , . K- ~~O I'D"k ~% \ ' q tS- ..; \f' U\ U\ ~~' ~ ~~ , ~.~'t' ~8 "4 ~ o~~~~ '> , ~~ \~ \"~ "' 'Z. - o - ~ ~ '0 ';I:. ~ ~ '> ~ ~.~s. r"o'2'O"'lV. I"d--' N/O/F .----- OWNER HENRIETTA A. MORMILE 31 BREVOORT PLACE ROCKVILLE CENTRE, N. Y. \ 116.98' '. 8& J. \ NIO~p.:SSI , o' VI. 14"Z'( \ s. ~WARD ZONING DISTRICT R 40 \ N/O/F ~StI \ ELEVA nONS SHOWN THUS'ZI,'ARE REFERENCED \ TO MSL. - '>> \ '!' ""'" ~~ ; q~ ''> t." -<. - .. ~ \ o _ o '0 q ~OO'\ ~1J. p.t<A~ ---- IV \ A , i /V \ '\ SITE \ If :/: /It r/ va <t.; /1 "-I. ' // II l<Q~ // (d 1'....---"-.,'".>.. ( r'~;, 'ii-'j UU DEG - 8 i , t \ I c",--_._) SURVEY OF PROPER FOR LOT LINE CHANGE A T LAUREL - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY 7000 - 728 - 04 - 09,75 & 76 Scale: 1" = 40' Nov. 9,1992 SOUT; ;iJ'L]' 'r- PlANn:;'~c r:~_' ~ J 1" /' I' ;:'I'-f' .-:- -r 1-. " ~ /..' >- '/?J"_"",'r;",:J>..,. ~. ,;l / "... (' . Y.S. Lie. NO. 49618 No Y. 1/971 .