Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-102.-5-9.3
THIS MINOR SUBD� IVISION IS FOR LOTS ON 7F ACRES LOCATED ON /IV no&al51' c:A a/ T, , }r!4 =A A,,- IN e0tncc��ve. — SCT1Itt 1000- io TMeeq 3 s1 e , Schcrl Ncos� Ka:3 MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) Complete application received �m� Application reviewed at work session =_ OK SOL OK n Applicant advised of necessary revisions wat Revised submission received Xro. OK SOL OK inro. Sketch plan approval — -with conditions 10 191 5 `tJ zuF s�l��9b cX+ Lead Agency Coordination _s-fuc�cG r198- SEQRA determination it a3 z .a, r Sent to Fire Commissioner io o Receipt of firewell location u z f P Notification to applicant to include on final map d Sent to County Planning Commission ,o a.D 9zAro.` 07K Receipt of County Report Z 2 ro.` OK Review of SCPC reportu �r Ic"a ctdaf�t b�1�-fepat 3/lf-I9b — b tujci� PZNq Draft Covenants and Restrictions received _t2j 07K Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed XJDOio. oK Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval . Final Public Hearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions Endorsement of subdivision a APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentafive) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be ............. ...... .. .. .. ................ . . . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .............. .. . .... ... . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: p / Liber . rJ3.9 4.. ...... . . . . . Page . . . . .. .. .. . On . . R (o..3. . . .. .. . . ; Liber . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .... Page On . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . ; Liber . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . . .. . Page . .. .. . . .. ... . . . . . .. .. . On . .. .:.. .. . . . . ..... .... . ; Liber . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .... . . . Page . .. .. . . .... . . . . . . .. .. . On . .. .. . . . . .. .. ... . .... . . ; Liber . ... . .... . . .. .... ...... . Page . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . On . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . ; as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .... oras distributee . .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .: .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. ....... . . ..... . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .................. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. . . ..... .. ... . . ... . ....... .. pp . 5. The area of the land is . . . .92•..5.f.. .. . acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid eeept . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . .... .. .. .. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . I . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . 7. The land is encumbered by . ..(`��. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . mortgage s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . .. .. . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . in original amount of $. . . . . . . .. . . . . . unpaid amount $ . . . . . . . . . . . :. . . . . . . . . held by . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . address . .. .. ... . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . in original amount of . . . .. . . . . . . . . . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . held 1) . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . � . .. . . . address . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . L — 1 f' �. . . . .. . . .... . . . .. . . . . . . �`' MAR 13 (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .. .. . . . . . . .. . Page . . . .. . . .... .... . in original amount Of . .. .... ...... . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . ..... .. .. .. . . . . . held by . .. .... .. .... ...... ... . .......... .. .. .... ... address 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. ... . . . ... .... ... . . .. .... .. . . .. ..... . . . .. . . .. . . . ... . . .. .. . . .. .. . . .. . . .. .... .. .. ......... .... . .. .. .14 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts .A M.Lr%k?:T. j.Aj.JF_- ....... .. .... .. .. ...... . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . ... . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . ...... .... ......... ...... .... 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex. cept ... .. .C1 P.n sr 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does-) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is 13. Water mains will be laid by . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. ... . .. . . .. . . .. .. . .... . . . . . . . . . .. . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . ... . . . .. .. . . .. . . .... .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat arc claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County IIi0lwaY system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are plaimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Ili-hwav system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. GKirri-j(. 5-rei#F Ili KiAIfJTA.1M0b My TOWN o* 5C)0T"0j_D . 18. There are no existing buildings or structures oil the land Which are not located and shown on the plat. ' 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoinin- sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said 9xistin", maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the :IPPlict"It will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 333 of the Real Property Law. 21. Stiblill't a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D".' 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $. .... .. .. . as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at . . . .. .. .. .. . . . years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE ... .... .... . l . .. .. .. . . .. 19� . W.144,1 A.M M . (Nameant) of Applicant) By . .. . . ... . .. .. ... . . . .. .... (Signature and Title . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. .... ...... . . .......... . ...... . .. . (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF �6 . .. .. . . .. .. .. ss: Ont .. . ./ day of. .. . .��%/.(. .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. 19 �. . ., before me personally came �•.:. . . .. . . to me known to/be a individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . . ; . . executed the same. MAN MWIC,�eof Now 1M1 ��l .tel . .�� No.52.4259000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Qualified to SuNolh Coup N tart' Public Commission Expires June 30.1995 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . ss: On the . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . day . .. .. . . .. . . . of . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19. .. .. ., before me personally came . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .. . to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that . . . .. .. .. .. . resides at No. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . that . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . is the . . . .. . . . . . of . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that . .. . . . . . . . . . knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. :u:,I that . . . . . . . . . . . . signed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . name thereto by like order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . Notary Public 14-16-2 (2107)-7c 617.21 SEAR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions M1i1LQR SORDIVISInN - 'Oe WI1IIRM T. &4XnE ,-T( D-} GRIFEW J1iZ6t:Tr lc.tEocruv Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 I Re: William J. Baxter, Jr. SCTm# 1000-102-5-9.3 Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no charges will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing --. structures are proposed. Yo/urs�ittruly, William J. &axter, Jr. 4#RT 1—PROJECT INFORMATICS 40 Prepared by Project Spoi�ilr JTICE This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a :,gnnlcant effect in the environment Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will notInvolve new studies, research Or Investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter Jr 1 LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Griffing. Street, Cutchohue Suffolk County NAME OFa�PPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE ;William)$axter, Jr. (203 1 637-4559 ADDRESS 11030 East Putnam Avenue I CITY/PO Greenwich STATE ZIP CODE CT 06830 NAME OF OWNER Ili different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE same ADDRESS CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Minor Subdivision of real property I Mei 13 Please C-O:n,.' ;e Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not ai,plicabie --- A. ejtO CeSCr;p,jon f'hr;sisal setting of overall project, both developed and undevelol,ed arca•: i present land use. Urban —Industrial -Commercial GResidential (subu(ban) �]Rural (non-farm) Cforest `Agri(ulture i::Othcr - 2 Total acreage of project area 2. 78 _ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 2_78 _ ages 2. 78 acres forested -------.___-- antis acres : A>;riC�itural (Includes orchards. cropland, pasture, etc ) aches acres res`.watcr or tidal as per Aoir '._s ;hl, 25 of FCL) - . _ —._ ar N _ Pans 1'�alel Sjrf,ice Area _ acres _ Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) --_-_—__-- acres _-_-- — acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres �iI1Di (I r1dlCate tspe)_ .71(,rf`( 3 1?i„tt Is ;rcJuruina,a soil tvpe(s) on project _itO °� of sale � A.tdcra���y � c„i1 ur ,acd "v of 51(e - s- _-- — .o . CPoorly drained % of site See Test Hole Data Sheet dated 8/21/91 b If a :y agricultural land is utvol.ed, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of (he NYS I-,.i d Classification System? NA acres (See 1 NYCRR 3;,,) 4 Are re b^ hock outs!; pings on project site? Yes RNo a `.'.fiat is depth to bedrock? NA (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of prod project site with slopes: 1-10-10% _GD--% 1110-15% % ❑15% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes ONo - 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes ANo 8. What is the depth of the water table? z 1 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes ONo u,nkr%o W N 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes KNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes ®No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes ONo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes WNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes YNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: C\n n e a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary AH 4 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Nix b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Dyes ®No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Dyes ONo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Dyes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Oyes iKNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes SdNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes 9l No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor Q. 39 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0 acres initially; 6 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 2.13 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NL (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N(1�' %; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 proposed o g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour G (upon completion of project)? h. If residential. Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. N I. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?j 00 ft. 3 w much natural materl+�l (i a rocrth, etc.) will be removed frr, he site n tons.cubic vards lilt disturbed areas be Aimed? Eyes No RNiA y a If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? NA b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Eyes ❑No NA .+' c Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes DNo NA 3. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. S will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? =Yes ENO 6 If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction NA months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: NA a Total number of phases anticipated (number). b Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month _ year, (including demolition). c Approximate completion date of final phase month _ year. d Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? CYes ❑No H. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes ®No 9 Number of jobs generatedi during construction NA after project is complete 0 10 Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11 Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Eyes XNo If yes, explain 12 Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes [NNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amoun, NA b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged NA 1 Y is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes 91No T•,pe NA l4. ill surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes hs'iN0 :Main -- I> fao;ert or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes DNo Do not know. i, Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes ONo 'f yes, what is the amount per month _`IA__. _ tons i. acs, v_;1 an ex,I.ting solid waste facility be used? ❑1'es CiNo .f yes, l;iv, name loeat en NA— -- d W.li any wastes not go into a sewage di<posal sy,tern or into a sanitary landfill? Eyes DNo NA c. .r yes, explain -------NA----------- ----- _._ rvj:ct involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑yes yNo s+':at is the anticipated rate of disposal? NA —._ tons%nonth. +•.;�:t i; the rnt;cipated site life? --.--_NA—__ years. U50 i:,•ri+ic ii e5 ur f„ticvr cs? L]Yes :$.NO +`. ill ;+rojzr_t routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? D•'es Ss No ^0 `^r'il' project produce operating noise exceed ig the local ambient noise levels? Eyes XNo -. .. .. ..i prcjeR result in an Incre.»e in encrg; use? ❑1'es e.wo N' 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pum; nog capacity NA gallons minute. 23. Toga ar.tici,,at•:rd water usage per day —CIA_ gallonsiday. 24. Does ;-rojcct. involve Local, State or f••d”" fwxl'ng? []Yes ®ado If Yes, explain NA ------- — 4 25. Approvals Required: • Submittal pe Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes ®No City, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes ❑No SvsbD%V.AIOM ket(o JAI. City, Town Zoning Board Dyes ®No A City, County Health Department IgYes ❑No AppeoaAc gi QeAUN t,hJiW,;ro.tJ [111-2.1,_I_ Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ONo n Other Regional Agencies ®Yes ❑No .SuFfo�rGwat:g I AMArl4b 01MM835001J State Agencies ❑Yes ®No Federal Agencies Dyes ❑'No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ®subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? - H 5 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? -froor 10.45 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? NIA 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? �4 1A5 as ptopo5ed). C6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 9Yes ❑No 7. Wheat are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/ mile radius of proposed action? t j�MmERC1AL . RE51DE1JT1ht_ &_600 r CH0R.GH 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoin ing/surrounding land uses within a 1/. mile? 18Yes ❑No 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 22, 0()6 Sa .tt• 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes 54No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Dyes RkNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes CgNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Spon or ame W lliam J. Baxter, Jr. Date January 27, 1995 Signature Title Owner If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 AOL • 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15,24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ Dyes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ F-1 Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveye.1 off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likelv cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 7 • 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ❑NO ❑YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 11 NO ❑YES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 • 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ [--]Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or f If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 1414.11 (2/87)-9c 617.21 SEAR Appendix B S t"te Environmental Quality Review Visual EAS' Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question I1 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-1/4 1/4-'/2 1/2-3 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? f • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes ❑No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes El No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISWNFG VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within r *'/a mile *1 mile l Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *1/2 mile ❑Yes ❑No *1 miles ❑Yes ❑No *2 miles ❑Yes ❑No r *3 miles ❑Yes El No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 PL Pr �FG�, VWAD TO._, 0 iSOU i-ROLD SU' F I LI�'-E?O,�,t, T ,,v Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms . If your answer- to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence: 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes No (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? Yes to 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes ©o 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other epar.TH ent r.r agency? (Town d , State, County, etc. ) Yes No S.C . 149p RUVAL Pen ,n,5 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? Yes No 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? Preb m,naryYes No n,pprooal eKpirc6. - -h;s 'is ee-"P1,*ca.4ibe 7. Does this property have a valid certificate of occupancy, if yes please submit .a copy of same Yes ( Nd V IL �J I certify that the above statements are true and will be relied on byt e annin Board in considering this application. January 27, 1995 Signature of prop ty owner or authorized agent date Attachment to questionnaire for: the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss : On the day of , 1W,�b efore me personally cam to me known to be the individual described in and who exec ed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that execute a WILLIAM WICKHAM Notary Public NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York CommNo.52-4259000 ray ission ExpirresJune 30,1995 i TOWN CLERK 42104 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD V ty,New York Phone 516-785-1801 uthold,New York 11971 Date JP I 19_�OF 3t.6 "w� -t � „�� . � �-- 3avy IIII ollars$ F�4J�,e aLael Judith T.Te ' rry,Town Clerk Cash ❑ Check �: (v�d By e 19-meya g E N CLERK F SOUTHOLD 44830 York Phone 516-765-1801 n ` New York 11971 19 T L Date IO — � �-- i cMars$��Judith T.Te Town Clerk ❑� 9 J.6 'v By. All c JUDITH T.TERRY,TOWN CLERK RECEIPT 54704 Town of Southold Southold,New York 11971 p Phone:516-)765-1801 DATE �� 1917, l'f . ECEIVED OF: (.tel- ff-C/tL �,( l LC�.�c.� ,d.at 11 CASH 9,,-'HECK IL U G BY: I-'LJ�. -'l.ti�_ • �pvgUFFO(,��, • MAE ING ADDRESS: ni,nw***�*+n nn nn nsr,nvnrnc .N P.0. Pp41174 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSEG 1 Southold, 141 11x 11 Chair y G OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J.CREMERS 54375 State Route 25 KENNETH L.EDWARDS O'� (cor.Main Rd.&Younger Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR Southold,NY GEORGE D. SOLOMON Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE February 15, 2005 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Ms. Catherine Mesiano 12 Mill Pond Lane East Moriches, NY 11940 Re: Proposed Subdivision Baxter at Griffing Street Located on the n/e side Griffing St. and the s/e side of School House Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-5-9.3 Zone: HB Dear Ms. Mesiano: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, February 14, 2005: WHEREAS, this subdivision is to divide 2.78 acres into 4 lots; and WHEREAS, August 24, 2004, the Town of Southold Town Board adopted Lo,:al Law No. 18, 2004 "A LoLaw in relation to a new Chapter Al 06— Subdivision of Land of the Code of the Town of Southold"; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that pursuant to Chapter Al 06, the Planning Board hereby classifies this application as a Standard Subdivision; and be it further RESOLVED, that the application must be revised and re-submitted to conform with Chapter Al 06—Subdivision of Land of the Code of the Town of Southold" and must be revised and resubmitted to conform with Chapter Al 06 —Subdivision of Land of the Code of the Town of Southold" in order for the Planning Board to process the application. Upon written request, the Planning Board may credit previously paid application fees towards the new application. The determination will be based upon the amount of work that has been accomplished to date on the application. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Jerilyn n B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney • gUtrw PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ��� Gy P.O. Box 1179 Chairman o= Town Hall,53095 State Route 25 d+ x Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO - 5 Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS • 'F KENNETH L. EDWARDS y?J�l �aO� Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN SIDOR,JR. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE August 20, 2002 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Catherine Mesiano 12 Mill Pond Lane East Moriches,NY 11940 Re: Town of Southold Moratorium Major and Minor Subdivisions Minor Subdivision of BCB Realty Croup SCTM# 1000-88-2-15 Minor Subdivision of Baxter at Griffing Street SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Minor Subdivision of Ralph Caselnova SCTM# 1000-18-3-9.8&9.9 Minor Subdivision of Nickart Realty SCTM# 1000-52-2-13 Minor Subdivision of Peconic Design and Construction SCTM# 1000-63-3-18.1 Major Subdivision Bayview Overlook. SCTM# 1000-79-5-20.6 &20.7 Dear Ms.Mesiano: As you are the agent for the above applications please be advised that a Local Law was adopted at the regular meeting of the Southold Town Board on August 13, 2002 entitled "Local Law to a Temporary Moratorium on Processing,Review of,and making decisions on applications for Major Subdivisions,Minor Subdivisions and Special Use Permits containing Dwelling Units in the Town of Southold". The Local Law Number 3. 2002 is attached. The Local Law states that the Planning Board Office "shall not accept for review,continue review,hold a hearing or make any decision upon any application for a subdivision, whether that subdivision application was submitted prior to or after the effective date of this law"for a duration of six months beginning August 13,2002. The above applications are subject to the Local Law. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact my office at 631-765- 1938. Sincerely, a Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman Enc. Cc: Joshua Y Horton, Supervisor Town Board Planning Board Greg Yakaboski,Town Attorney Kathleen Murphy,Assistant Town Attorney PLANNING BOARD MEMBE OSdFF01,fC • BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. 0� QG Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman /�� % P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS '2 Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS W Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. `F Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO yifJOl �aQ�' PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 14, 2000 Abigail Wickham Wickham, Wickham, & Bressler 10315 Main Road P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. on Griffing St. SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.4 (Cutchogue) Dear Ms. Wickham, I have reviewed the latest map submission regarding the above property with the Planning Board. The Board additional suggestions. They would like language put in the Covenants and Restrictions declaring that the parking for the lots will be in the rear of the property, and Will not be in the front. This should also be placed on the map. "No Parking In Front" should be written across the front of the lots and "Parking Only In Rear" should be written in the back of the lots. The purpose of this is to maintain the neighborhood character of the hamlet business district. Another related restriction that we discussed was the building location. The Board would like to see a requirement that the buildings be located as close to the street as possible (at the 15' front setback line). This would also be listed in the Covenants and Restrictions and shown on the map for each lot. Please also have the surveyor write the lot number(9.4) after the district, section, and block numbers on the map. After these requirements have been satisfied, the public hearing will be set. Let me know if you have any questions or problems with our requests. Sincerely, C�Turner Planner LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.c. 10315 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND ERIC J. BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 MELVILLE OFFICE 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM SUITE III LYNNE M.GORDON 631-298-8353 MELVILLE, NEW YORK II]4] JANET GEASA TELEFAX NO. 631-298-8565 631-249-9480 TELEFAX NO.631-249-9484 November 22, 2000 D � Att: Mr. Craig Turner Southold Town Planning Board NO 27 Post Office Box 1179 53095 Main Road SOIIftb Tomm Southold,New York 11971 Plarming awd Re: William J. Baxter,Jr.—GrifTng Street Property Dear Craig: Enclosed is the revised map showing ingress and egress limited to Lot 1 and the common boundary of Lots 3 &4. I will draw covenants in accordance with the Board's requirements and send them for your review. Very truly yours, Abigail A. Wickham AAW/dmc encl. 30/shdtnpb! cc. C Mesiano 0 Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: 41, I ' �kVap-Q, Subject: c) �r/C SCTMA 1000- r Date: ,-p - � , 0(D Comments: 0 t Pe LAW OFFICES / WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. (/ 10315 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND MELVILLE OFFICE ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM SUITE III LYNNE M.GORDON 516-298-8353 MELVILLE,NEW YORK 11747 JANET GEASA TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 516-249-9480 HUBERT F.SULLIVAN TELEFAX NO. 516-249-9484 May 13, 1999 Aft: Melissa Spiro, Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Post Office Box 1179 " MAY 15 1999 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Southold Town Re: William J. Baxter, Jr. Planning Board Griffing Street, Cutchogue, NY Dear Melissa: Enclosed for your review are the following items required for submission of this matter for final minor subdivision approval: 1. Five prints of the proposed final map, which have been reviewed and approved by J. Richter. 2. Copy of the proposed covenants and restrictions which have been revised in accordance with your request. They have been amended as follows: -Reference to common access points specified on the map has been deleted, since Mr. Richter suggested that exact access points not be determined until site plan review. -The owner's obligation to widen the street at the corner has been included. -The reference to the performance guarantee has been included. 3. Copy of the proposed performance guaranty, which was also submitted to you in November. If acceptable, the originals of items 2. And 3. will be delivered to your office prior to execution of the final maps. If the maps are acceptable to the Board and conditional Melissa Spiro Page — 2 - final approval is issued, I will obtain a final Health Department signature and submit the necessary prints and mylars to you for the Board's signature. Please advise if you require anything further or would like to meet with me to review this matter. Very truly yours, lay IKXL� Abigail A. Wickham AAW/baw Encl. 30n/shdtnpb DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS DECLARATION, made the day of 199 , by WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. , residing at 1030 E . Putnam Avenue, Greenwich, Connecticut, referred to as the Declarant . WHEREAS, the Declarant is the owner of certain real property situate at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, more particularly bounded and described as set forth in Schedule "A" annexed hereto, and WHEREAS, the Declarant has made application to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for approval to subdivide the said real property into four (4 ) parcels in a subdivision known as Minor Subdivision of Property surveyed for William J. Baxter, Jr . , and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of subdivision approval, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold has deemed it to be in the best interests of the Town of Southold and the owner and prospective owners of said parcels that the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on said parcels, and as a condition of said approval, said Planning Board has required that the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk' s Office, and WHEREAS, the Declarant has considered the foregoing and determined that the same will be for the best interest of the Declarant and subsequent owners of said parcels . J NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH : That the Declarant, for the purposes of carrying out the intentions above expressed, does hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said premises herein described shall hereafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers and holders of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to wit : 1 . DECLARANT agrees and consents that at the time of Site Plan review of proposed construction of improvements on each of 'the lots, the Planning Board may condition its Site Plan approval on an internal parking area layout and common curb cuts, whereby internal access between the parking areas of the adjoining lots in the subdivision shall be provided. 2 . DECLARANT further agrees that title to each of the lots in the subdivision shall be conveyed together with and subject to an easement over the relevant portion of the lot for such purposes . 3 . DECLARANT further agrees that curbs and sidewalks for the subdivision, and new pavement for widening at the corner between Griffing Street and School House Lane as shown on the map, will be installed and completed by DECLARANT, his successors or assigns, prior to the issuance of a building permit for any of the lots in the subdivision. y 9 . DECLARANT has posted a Performance Guarantee with the Town of Southold to insure completion of the above . 5 . In consideration of the Planning Board waiving the Park and Recreation fee permitted to be imposed under Section A106-38 (E) of the Town Code of the Town of Southold, the DECLARANT hereby covenants and agrees that the premises shall not be used for residential purposes without written resolution of the Planning Board approving such use, which resolution may include, without limitation, the requirement of the payment of a Park and Recreation fee in lieu of land for park and playground use under Section A106-38 (E) . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant above named has executed the foregoing Declaration the day and year first above written. William J. Baxter, Jr. STATE OF NEW YORK: : SS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: On the day of 199 , before me personally came WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed same . Notary Public re :C&Rprkg& PERFORMANCE GUARANTY This GUARANTY made this day of 199 , by WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. , residing at 1030 E . Putnam Avenue, Greenwich, CT 06830 hereinafter GUARANTOR) to the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, a New York municipality with offices at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, N. Y. 11971 (hereinafter TOWN) . WITNESSETH: That GUARANTOR has made application to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for approval of subdivide real property at E/S Griffing Street, Cutchogue, N .Y. into a 9-lot minor subdivision known as Minor Subdivision prepared for WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. , and That the Planning Board has conditioned approval upon the installation of curbing and sidewalks at the Property as shown on the filed map, and has required a performance guaranty to insure completion of same; THEREFORE, in consideration of the subdivision approval, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the GUARANTOR agrees as follows : 1 . GUARANTOR agrees to install and carry to completion all construction and other work necessary to complete the curbing and sidewalks shown on the filed map herein (the WORK) . 2 . GUARANTOR agrees that the WORK will be completed as to the entire subdivision prior to issuance of a building permit for any one lot . 3 . A. No amendment, modification, termination or waiver of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the GUARANTOR with the written approval of the Southold Town Planning Board, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which given . B. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the TOWN and Guarantor and their respective successors and assigns . 0 C. This Agreement and all documents related hereto shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GUARANTOR hereto has executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written . William J. Baxter, Jr. Guarantor STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) On the day of 1998, before me personally came WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. Notary Public 21n-perfguar • S�bj mS LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. 10315 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND WILLIAM WICKHAM NEW YORK 11952 ERIC BRESSLER ABIGAIL MELVILLE OFFICE L A.WICKHAM 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROADSUITE III LYNNE M.GORDON 516-298-8353 MELVILLE,NEW YORK 11747 JANET GEASA TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 HUBERT F.SULLIVAN 516-249-9480TELEFAX NO. 516-249-9484 April 2, 1999 Mr. James Richter Town of Southold Planning Board Post Office Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Re: William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffiing Street, Cutchogue,NY Dear Jim: Enclosed is a revised plan as per your previous correspondence. Please review and advise if it is satisfactory so I may make the final submission to the Planning Board Very y urs, i Abigail . Wickham AAW/baw Encl. Cc Ms. Melissa Spiro 30n/shdtnpb APR 0 6 1999 Southold Town Planning Board JEAN W. COCHRAN o � JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR p ^:+ ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD y TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax. (516)-765-3136 j `� Tel,(516)-765- 1802 /Ns OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 22, 1998 Gail Wickham Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, PC P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, New York 11952 Re: William J. Baxter, Jr. - Minor Subdivision Cutchogue,New York - SCTM #: 1000-102-5-9.4 Dear Gail: I have reviewed the above referenced subdivision with Ray Jacobs to verify his requirements concerning the construction requirements for this project. I have outlined his wishes on the enclosed photocopy for your reference. I will also be forwarding a copy of this to the Planning Board for their comments. If you have any questions concerning the enclosed, please do not hesitate to contact my office. erely; James A. Richter. R.A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs (superintendent of High s) To%4PIm ring Board, 1[iz1SY S�okL to C LO;ckbwm ra•.b�skus. J. 'ya�r5rn 5 IVA, wotk�N� on reused �, S� sa��. 51.e w�q v1ke a�otvrer� —� feu+e�J all o�tSFanc9 N� D ��S .A�PM `NaD ��N�T�•P C� , L DEC 22 NJU 1 � I SOUthad Town Punning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBER SQFFO(/ �0 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. 0.�0 Gy< P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Southold,New York 11971 WILLIAM J. CREMERS y Z Fax(516) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS �+' T GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Telephone(516) 765-1938 RICHARD G.WARD y'11p1 �•a0� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 15, 1998 Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, P.C. P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for William J. Baxter SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Wickham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 14, 1998: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an additional six month extension of sketch approval from November 16, 1998 to May 16, 1999. Conditional sketch approval was granted on May 18, 1995. This additional extension has been granted due to the death of Mr. Van Tuyl and the need to prepare a new survey. Please note that this is the final extension that the Planning Board will be granting for this subdivision. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. fS Chairman * JEAN W. COCHRAN JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR p • ENGINEER 3ueff= TOWN OF SOUTHOLD y `, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Pa Fax. (516)-765-3136 •� ��O Tel.(516)-765-1802 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 10, 1998 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board pae08 6uluuald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road unnol P101pog Southold, New York 11971 Re: William J. Baxter Subdivision a Griffing Street, Cutchogue, N.Y. SCTM #: 1000 - 102 - 05 - 9.3 t � } . . Dear Mr. Orlowski As per the Planning Board, this project requires the construction of curbs and sidewalks along the entire length of road frontage. It has also been suggested that the entrances should be evaluated when development of the individual lots are presented to the Board. At this time, it will be necessary for the applicant to propose the locations of curbs and sidewalks for review. This should be provided by the applicant even if the Board does not require construction at this time. The curb and 4' wide sidewalk should generally align with and follow the property lines. The existing pavement will need to be saw cut and grassed shoulder areas will need to be paved to meet Town standards where necessary. The alignment of new curbing will also be needed to establish the final location of the proposed drainage facilities. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. Si ly, mes A. Richter, R.A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS* 0�� CQ Town Hall,53095 Main Road BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. = Gy� P.O. Box 1179 rm Chaian cz Southold,New York 11971 WILLIAM J. CREMERS w 2 Fax(516) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS UW- GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y Telephone(516) 765-1938 RICHARD G.WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD No'j- 23 1sg8 James Richter Engineering Department Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: �ax��rz - Kiri +N4 S{feet Tax Map No.: 1000- loi-- 5 - 9.3 Street Location: f'9.;jfG���" School 1koote Lane Hamlet Location: e2mw'4'w Type of Application: x Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated 9 / 1-5 / 99 ) Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Comments Due come or Yeur T-f Cor re�of'cs i..r'Zl,ic SUbA.:u.c.aN. � -(� ;S f04++:rw�� 51(�P.Lt1C.Q1Zi AJC000 CLAU- or, 1 .mrxny a.u+nw�J+s.w`+tC� musk �e Sl+C.Sn eh Zh0 YMAQ�.t \`C. %-CcS-Vun 5+�h Contact person: N\0-t%& A- ;Ro CC: Ed Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement 0 RAYMOND L. JACOBS RS A. RICHTER, R.A. m I : SUPERINTENDENT "p ^' ENGINEER SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT �' `� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax. (516)-765-1750 Tel.(516)-765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APRIL 21 , 1997 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: William J. Baxter- Minor Subdivision Griffing Street, Cutchogue, New York SCTM #: 1000 - 102 - 05 - 9.3 Dear Mr. Orlowski : As per your request (dated 4/8/97), 1 have prepared a Bond Estimate for the above referenced subdivision. As you know, the latest map does not indicate all of the potential work necessary for the completion of this project. The applicant had suggested that the final design be performed when the future development requirements for the property is known. The bond estimate enclosed should be considered comprehensive and a complete listing all potential work that may be required. For instance; curbing, sidewalks and driveway aprons were provided in front of the adjacent southerly property to allow the existing sidewalks to be connected to the new construction. Also, four individual driveway aprons were included for each of the four lots within the subdivision. Combining two or more of these aprons would reduce the bond amount proposed. To align the new sidewalks to the existing and to allow for paved shoulder areas in front of the curbing, pavement consisting of a stone base and asphalt wearing surface has been included. The Superintendent of Highways has also requested that the entire road fronting the project be Micro-Surfaced to allow for a uniform transition between the new shoulder area and the existing pavement. The remaining items indicated on the proposed bond should be self explanatory. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. Si erely, James A. Richter, R.A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways) n , l APR 2 j L_, o�gr,1FF04co� . RAYMOND L. JACOBS• JAVES A. RICHTER, R.A. Go SUPERINTENDENT _ ENGINEER SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT y �� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 0 17 x. (516)-765-1750 Tel.(516)-765.3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOND ESTIMATE FOR WILLIAM J. BAXTER GRIFFING STREET, CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK SCTM # 1000-102-05-9.3 APRIL 21, 1997 ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE BOND AMOUNT 1. 50 L.F. SAW CUT ASPHALT PAVEMENT $ 3.00 $ 150.00 2. 400 C.Y. ROUGH GRADING/UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 5.00 2,000.00 3. 1 EACH CATCH BASIN 3,000.00 3,000.00 4. 60 L.F. 30"Diameter DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 1,800.00 5. 1 EACH CONCRETE HEADWALL 1,500.00 1,500.00 6. 2 C.Y. BLUE STONE RIP-RAP(8"- 10") 50.00 100.00 7. 800 L.F. CONCRETE CURBING 10.00 8,000.00 8. 500 S.Y. FINE GRADING 1.50 750.00 9. 2,800 S.F. CONCRETE SIDEWALK 3.50 9,800.00 10. 1,100 S.F. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRONS 4.50 4,950.00 11. 50 C.Y. 3/4"BLUE STONE BLEND BASE COURSE 40.00 2,000.00 12. 60 TONS ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE 50.00 3,000.00 13. 2,600 S.Y. MICRO-SURFACING 1.00 2,600.00 14. 20 EACH STREET TREES 200.00 4.000.00 15. 300 S.Y. TOPSOIL&SEED 5.00 1,500.00 16. 1 EACH STREET LIGHT 2,000.00 2.000.00 17. 4 EACH CONCRETE SURVEY MONUMENTS 100.00 400.00 18. 1 EACH FIRE WELL 15,000.00 15,000.00 19. JOB MAINTENANCE& PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 2,000.00 2,000.00 SUB TOTAL $ 64,550.00 +6%ADMINISTRATION FEE 3,673.00 TOTAL $ 68,423.00 APR 2 ( • PLANNING BOARD MEMBB: QSpFFOKC Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARD P.O.Box 1179 tiZ Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. • Fax(516)765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR O Telephone(516) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS KENNETH L.DWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 2, 1997 Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposed minor subdivision William J. Baxter -Griffing Street SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Wickham: The Planning Board has reviewed James Richter's report dated January 30, 1997, in regard to the above mentioned subdivision. The Planning Board has adopted' Mr. Richter's report. The Board is requiring that either the curbing and sidewalk be installed prior to any endorsement of the subdivision or that a performance guarantee for the curbing and sidewalk, in. addition to the other subdivision improvements, be submitted prior to any endorsement of the subdivision. If your client chooses to submit a performance guarantee, a condition will be placed on the subdivision that the curbing and sidewalk for the entire subdivision must be completed by your client prior to the issuance of a building permit for any of the individual lots. The curbing and sidewalk for the entire subdivision must be installed atone time, and may not be installed one lot at a time. In addition, if your client chooses to submit a performance guarantee, the Board will be requiring as a condition of any final approval, that the deed to each proposed lot must contain the aforementioned condition. The location of the curbing and sidewalk, along with all other subdivision improvements, must be indicated on the final map. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. sincerely, �^ ��/j Melissa a Splro �(, w Planner enc. FFo40 RAYMOND L. ]ACAS o� JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. �� SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEERING INSPECTOR SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT • PECONIC LANE, PECONIC, N.Y. �f Fax. (516)-765-1750 y�Ol ��OTel. (516)-765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. JANUARY 30, 1997 Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Re: WILLIAM J. BAXTER Minor Subdivision Southold, New York 11971 Griffing Street, Cutchogue, New York SCTM # : 1000 - 102 - 05 - 9.3 Dear Mr. Orlowski : As per your request, I have reviewed the latest submission concerning the above referenced subdivision. The records provided by the applicant indicate that the proposed widening of Griffing Street was recorded in 1968. Since this is the case, my report, dated 2/23/96, suggested that there might be difficulty in locating new sidewalks and curbing would not be accurate. The new map submitted by the applicant, dated 10/16/96, has indicated the installation of a catch basin and culvert pipe to be constructed at the corner of School House Road and Griffing Street. This culvert would divert road run off into a low drainage area that is owned by the Town and will provide adequate storage capacity to handle the drainage requirements for the adjacent roads. Additional drainage systems for potential development of the property can and should be designed when the individual lots come up for site plan review. The applicant has also suggested that new sidewalks and curbing should not be installed until the first site plan is approved. The avenues by which you decide when and how to ensure construction of these items 1 will leave in your hands. However, I would like to suggest that any curbing required at the corner of School House and Griffing adjacent to the proposed Catch Basin should be installed with the drainage. The entire curb radius should be designed and constructed such that it will meet uniformly with future curbing. The last four to five feet of each end of the new curb should also be sectioned off and turned downward to prevent snow plows and other vehicles from inadvertent contact. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. 4cerelA. Richter, R.A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways) rJAN 10d0RQRND , _ .! • • Vie', ?B� �5 LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. 10315 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND MELVILLE OFFICE ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM SUITE III LYNNE M.GORDON 516-298-8353 MELVILLE,NEW YORK 11747 JANET GEASA TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 516-249-9480 HUBERT F.SULLIVAN TELEFAX NO. 516-249-9484 November 10, 1998 Att : Melissa Spiro, Planner D D Town of Southold Planning Board Post Office Box 1179 NOY 1 `L 1998 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Southold Town Re : William J. Baxter, Jr .—Minor Subdivision Planning Board Griffing Street, Cutchogue - SCTM# 1000-102-5-9 . 3 Dear Melissa: Enclosed for your review are the following in connection with the final approval in this matter: 1 . Three prints of the proposed final map prepared by Joseph Ingegno, L. S . On reviewing the maps, I noted that the proposed sidewalks and curbs were not shown, and have sent a print to Mr. Richter at the request of the surveyor to confirm the desired placement and size of the sidewalks and curbs . As soon as we have a response from Mr . Richter, the maps will be amended to include this item as well as the two common driveway access points shown on the prior maps and referred to in the Covenants and Restrictions . The map will then be submitted to the Health Department for signature . 2 . Copy of proposed Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions, which addresses the following requirements : a . Internal parking and common curb cuts as a condition of site plan approval . b. Common access points onto Griffing Street . C. Installation of curbs and sidewalks prior to building permits . d. Waiver of park and playground fee. 3 . Copy of proposed deed restrictions as to sidewalks and curbs and common access easements . 9 . Proposed Performance Guarantee . I would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you, or with the Board at a work session, if further discussion is required with regard to the requirements . Given the additional material provided herein, we request that the November 16, 1998 deadline be deemed met or extended to accommodate the modification and signing of the maps as indicated above. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, -/)g A� Abigail A. Wickham AAW/dmc Encl . MYdXb1b 0 Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street Cutchogue, N.Y. The following Covenant and Restriction is to be included in all deeds from William J. Baxter, Jr. to purchasers of lots on the subdivision map: SUBJECT to the following Covenant and Restriction, which shall run with the land: The Town of Southold shall not be required to issue any building permit for construction of any structure on the premises unless the sidewalks and curbing required by the Town of Southold as a condition of thesubdivision approval have been installed and completed for all lots in the subdivision. The following Easement language is to be included in all such deeds: SUBJECT TO and TOGETHER WITH an easement over the area designated on the filed map as "Reserved for Possible Common Access" on Lots and (Insert appropriate lot numbers) for ingress and egress, installation of curb cuts and driveways and parking area access, drainage and appropriate and permitted direc- tional signage. The maintenance of such area shall be shared by all of the aforesaid lots which contain building improvements. i PERFORMANCE GUARANTY This GUARANTY made this day of 199 , by WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. , residing at 1030 E. Putnam Avenue, Greenwich, CT 06830 hereinafter GUARANTOR) to the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, a New York municipality with offices at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, N.Y. 11971 (hereinafter TOWN) . WITNESSETH: That GUARANTOR has made application to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for approval of subdivide real property at E/S Griffing Street, Cutchogue, N.Y. into a 9-lot minor subdivision known as Minor Subdivision prepared for WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. , and That the Planning Board has conditioned approval upon the installation of curbing and sidewalks at the Property as shown on the filed map, and has required a performance guaranty to insure completion of same; THEREFORE, in consideration of the subdivision approval, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the GUARANTOR agrees as follows : 1 . GUARANTOR agrees to install and carry to completion all construction and other work necessary to complete the curbing and sidewalks shown on the filed map herein (the WORK) . 2 . GUARANTOR agrees that the WORK will be completed as to the entire subdivision prior to issuance of a building permit for any one lot . 3 . A. No amendment, modification, termination or waiver of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the GUARANTOR with the written approval of the Southold Town Planning Board, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which given. B. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the TOWN and Guarantor and their respective successors and assigns . C. This Agreement and all documents related hereto shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GUARANTOR hereto has executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. William J. Baxter, Jr. Guarantor STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) On the day of 1998, before me personally came WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. Notary Public 21n-perfguar PLANNING BOARD MEMBER �o�,SIUFOL tC4OG 0 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box 1179 Chairman ? Southold, New York 11971 WILLIAM J. CREMERS H Fax(516) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS W Telephone(516) 765-1935 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. RICHARD G.WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 19, 1998 Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, P.C. P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for William J. Baxter SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Wickham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 18, 1998: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an additional six month extension of sketch approval from May 16, 1998 to November 16, 1998. Conditional sketch approval was granted on May 18, 1995. This additional extension has been granted due to the death of Mr. Van Tuyl and the need to prepare a new survey. Please note that this is the final extension that the Planning Board will be granting for this subdivision. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, &v� Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Xf Chairman LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. 10315 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND WILLIAM WICKHAM NEW YORK 11952 MELOFFICE ERIC J. BRESSLER 275 BROAADD LE HOLLOW ROAD ABIGAILA.WICKHAM SUITE III 516-298-0353 MELVILLE,NEW YORK 11747 LYNNE M.GORDON JANET GEASA TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 516-249-9400 HUBERT F. SULLIVAN TELEFAX NO. 516-249-9484 May 11, 1998 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re : Proposed minor subdivision for William J. Baxter Griffing Street, Cutchogue, N.Y. SCTM# 1000-102-5-9 . 3 Gentlemen: Regarding this subdivision, the applicant is still working on the resurvey of the property. We would appreciate your consent to a further six-month extension. Very truly yours, AjAgail A. Wickham AAW:jm 30-plbdofc VIA FACSIMILE & REGULAR MAIL 765-3136 MAY 11 1998 Southold Town Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS may. GGy'p o Town Hall,53095 Main Road BENNETT ORLOWSHI,JR. Chairman ti Z P.O. Box 1179 W �+ Southold,New York 11971 WILLIAM J.CREMERS y `� Fax(516) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS 'l1�1 �.a� Telephone(516) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. RICHARD G.WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 25, 1997 Abigail Wickham, Esq. Wickham, Wickham & Bressler P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for William J. Baxter SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Wickham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 24, 1997: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an additional six month extension of sketch approval from November 16, 1997 to May 16, 1998. This additional extension has been granted due to the death of Mr. Van Tuyl and the need to prepare a new survey. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. !�5 Chairman LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. 10315 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND WILLIAM WICKHAM NEW YORK 11952 MELVILLE OFFICE ERIC J. BRESSLER 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM SUITE III LYNNE M.GORDON 516-298-8353 MELVILLE, NEW YORK 11747 JANET GEASA TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 516-249-9480 JEFFREY STARR TELEFAX NO. 516-249-9484 HUBERT F.SULLIVAN November 13 , 1997 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re : Proposed minor subdivison for William J. Baxter Griffing Street, Cutchogue, N.Y. SCTM# 1000-102-5-9 .3 Gentlemen: Since we last corresponded with you on this matter, we have been attempting to obtain a new survey due to the death of Mr. Van Tuyl and our inability to proceed with his office on the map. Unfortunately, the new survey has not been forthcoming, and we have now asked Young & Young of Riverhead to proceed with the necessary map. We hope to have it to you shortly and ask your consideration of an extension of this subdivision. Very, truly yours, /Abigail A. Wickham AAW:mh encl . 30-plbdofc NOV 1 4 1997 ,'i • ;O��gOFFO �-�; PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Gym a Town Hall, 53095 Main Road BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. o j Chairman 2 ;1 P.O. Box 1179 ^T -i Southold, New York 11971 WILLIAM J. CREMERS Fax (516) 765-3136 KENNETCHIEDWARDSLATHAM =�'�� ��� '� Telephone(516) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. a� a '`�' RICHARD G.WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 13, 1997 Abigail Wickham, Esq. P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for William J. Baxter SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Wickham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 12, 1997: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an additional six month extension of sketch approval from May 16, 1997 to November 16, 1997. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. S Chairman LAW OFFICES M5 WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.c. 10315 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM MATTITUC K, LONG ISLAND MELVILLE OFFICE ERIC J. BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM SUITE III LYNNE M.GORDON 516-298-8353 MELVILLE,NEW YORK 11747 JANET GEASA TELEFAX NO, 516-298-8565 516-249-9480 JEFFREY STARR TELEFAX NO. 516-249-9464 HUBERT F.SULLIVAN May 5, 1997 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Melissa Soiro Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision William J. Baxter - Griffing Street SCTM# 1000-102-5-9 . 3 Dear Melissa: While you were on vacation I spoke to Valerie about the Board' s requirements for a performance guarantee . I believe she was going to ask the Town Engineer for an estimate. Please advise when that figure is available so we may discuss a performance bond with Mr. Baxter. Your letter of April 2nd, 1997, indicates that the location of the curb and sidewalks and other subdivision improvements must be indicated on the final map. As I expect we will be submitting a performance guarantee rather installing the improvements prior to filing the final map, I will have the surveyor show the proposed location of the sidewalk and curbing. Since we did not receive the Engineer' s report and the Planning Board' s response thereto until recently, and given the fact that we will have to perform additional survey work, probably starting over with another surveyor, I would appreciate an extension for submission of the final map. If you need additional information, please feel free to contact me . P A. Wickham AAW:mh _ CC : William J. Baxter, Jr. 30-plbofc : Ii I Li MAY 710 _ ;I 6 �o�gUFfO(,rc • Z RAYMOND L. JACOBS � JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. 00i SUPERINTENDENT SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 10- y TOWNOF SOUTHOLD Far. (516)-765-1750 �O'� # �' Tel.(516)-765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APRIL 21 , 1997 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: William J. Baxter- Minor Subdivision Griffing Street, Cutchogue, New York SCTM #: 1000 - 102 - 05 - 9.3 Dear Mr. Orlowski : As per your request (dated 4/8/97), 1 have prepared a Bond Estimate for the above referenced subdivision. As you know, the latest map does not indicate all of the potential work necessary for the completion of this project. The applicant had suggested that the final design be performed when the future development requirements for the property is known. The bond estimate enclosed should be considered comprehensive and a complete listing all potential work that may be required. For instance; curbing, sidewalks and driveway aprons were provided in front of the adjacent southerly property to allow the existing sidewalks to be connected to the new construction. Also, four individual driveway aprons were included for each of the four lots within the subdivision. Combining two or more of these aprons would reduce the bond amount proposed. To align the new sidewalks to the existing and to allow for paved shoulder areas in front of the curbing, pavement consisting of a stone base and asphalt wearing surface has been included. The Superintendent of Highways has also requested that the entire road fronting the project be Micro-Surfaced to allow for a uniform transition between the new shoulder area and the existing pavement. The remaining items indicated on the proposed bond should be self explanatory. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. Si erely, 9a James A. Richter, R.A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways) APR 2 RAYMOND L. JACOBS JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERINTENDENT p ENGINEER SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT y TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fac. (516)-765-1750 �O'� �' Tel.(516)-765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOND ESTIMATE FOR WILLIAM J. BAXTER GRIFFING STREET, CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK SCTM # 1000-102-05-9.3 APRIL 21, 1997 ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE BOND AMOUNT 1. 50 L.F. SAW CUT ASPHALT PAVEMENT $ 3.00 $ 150.00 2. 400 C.Y. ROUGH GRADING/UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 5.00 2,000.00 3. 1 EACH CATCH BASIN 3,000.00 3,000.00 4. 60 L.F. 30" Diameter DRAINAGE PIPE 30.00 1,800.00 5. 1 EACH CONCRETE HEADWALL 1,500.00 1,500.00 6. 2 C.Y. BLUE STONE RIP-RAP (8"- 10") 50.00 100.00 7. 800 L.F. CONCRETE CURBING 10.00 8,000.00 8. 500 S.Y. FINE GRADING 1.50 750.00 9. 2,800 S.F. CONCRETE SIDEWALK 3.50 9,800.00 10. 1,100 S.F. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRONS 4.50 4,950.00 11. 50 C.Y. 3/4" BLUE STONE BLEND BASE COURSE 40.00 2,000.00 12. 60 TONS ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE 50.00 3,000.00 13. 2,600 S.Y. MICRO-SURFACING 1.00 2,600.00 14. 20 EACH STREET TREES 200.00 4,000.00 15. 300 S.Y. TOPSOIL&SEED 5.00 1,500.00 16. 1 EACH STREET LIGHT 2,000.00 2,000.00 17. 4 EACH CONCRETE SURVEY MONUMENTS 100.00 400.00 18. 1 EACH FIRE WELL 15,000.00 15,000.00 19. JOB MAINTENANCE& PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 2,000.00 2,000.00 SUB TOTAL $ 64,550.00 +6%ADMINISTRATION FEE 3,873.00 TOTAL $ 68,423.00 APR 21 o��s�FFD(KcoG PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �Z` ':;A Town Hall, 53095 Main Road o P.O. Box 1179 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. y Southold,New York 11971 Chainnan O = Fax(516)765-3136 WILLIAM J.CREMERSpoi Telephone(516) 765-1938 dao KENNETH L.EDWARDS y GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. T RICHARD G.WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Apr-a 11991 James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: Will"" Tax Map No.: 1000 2--5-9.3 Street Location: �v f2-PfinQ S{ Scncol Hamlet Location: Eu Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Datedy—I Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated=--) Final Subdivision Map Road Profiles (Dated / Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated_�I Other (Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated ) Preliminary Site Plan (Dated! Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated(Dated/ _) Other Comments�lea� Contact person: • • LAW OFFICES S WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.c. yds MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND WILLIAM WICKHAM NEW YORK 11952 MELVILLE OFFICE ERIC J.BRE55LER ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM 516-844-1208 516-296-6353 TELEFAX NO. 516-694-0931 LYNNE M.GORDON TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 HUBERT F.SULLIVAN JANET GEASA JEFFREY STARR April 3 , 1997 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Melissa Spiro Re : Proposed Minor Subdivision William J. Baxter - Griffing Street SCTM# 1000-102-5-9 . 3 Dear Melissa: Regarding your letter of April 2nd, 1997, I would appreciate your advising as to the amount, if any, of the guarantee referred to in your letter, as well as the documentation required. In the event Mr. Baxter prefers to proceed with a performance guarantee, I would ask that the Board accept a performance bond, together with a covenant and map notation containing the condition set forth in your letter. Since the map work has been performed by Mr. Van Tuyl' s office, we are ascertaining whether or not that office will be able to continue with the map. In either event, I anticipate further delays in the map revisions . Very ly yours, j igail A. Wickham AAW:mh r CC : William Baxter 5" --- t 0 , 30-plbofc 4 PLANNING BOARD MEMBOS ��gUFF01,Y�O • RICHARD G.WARD ht.� Gy Town Hall, 53095 Main Road c t P.O. Box 1179 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. ti Southold,New York 11971 u- T Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSHI,JR. O WILLIAM J. CREMERS ?� �� Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 2, 1997 Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposed minor subdivision William J. Baxter -Griffing Street SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Wickham: The Planning Board has reviewed James Richter's report dated January 30, 1997, in regard to the above mentioned subdivision. The Planning Board has adopted' Mr. Richter's report. The Board is requiring that either the curbing and sidewalk be installed prior to any endorsement of the subdivision or that a performance guarantee for the curbing and sidewalk, in. addition to the other subdivision improvements, be submitted prior to any endorsement of the subdivision. If your client chooses to submit a performance guarantee, a condition will be placed on the subdivision that the curbing and sidewalk for the entire subdivision must be completed by your client prior to the issuance of a building permit for any of the individual lots. The curbing and sidewalk for the entire subdivision must be installed atone time, and may not be installed one lot at a time. In addition, if your client chooses to submit a performance guarantee, the Board will be requiring as a condition of any final approval, that the deed to each proposed lot must contain the aforementioned condition. The location of the curbing and sidewalk, along with all other subdivision improvements, must be indicated on the final map. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, ,///" Melissa Planner enc. LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.c. MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND ERIC BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 MELVILLE OFFICE ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM 516-8441208 516-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.516-694-0931 LYNNE RDON HUBERT.G SULLIVANTELEFAX NO, 516-298-8565 HUBERT F. ULLIV JANET GEASA JEFFREY STARR March 14 , 1997 Ms . Melissa Spiro Southold Town Planning Board P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re : Wm. J. Baxter Minor Subdivision Griffing Street, Cutchogue Dear Melissa: In November, 1996 we were granted a six month extension of time to May 16, 1997, in the above referenced matter, because of the Town Engineer having been injured and out of the office . Can you give us any information on the status of this matter? Veryxt lY yours, _ AhdBail A. Wickham 30-pingbd MAR 17 q9 RAYMOND L. ]A•BS ��oFFOL/rco� ]AWES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEERING INSPECTOR SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Dy • PECONIC LANE, PECONIC, N.Y. -`rl Fax. (516)-765-1750 �O1 � Tel. (516)-765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. JANUARY 30, 1997 Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Re: WILLIAM J. BAXTER Minor Subdivision Southold, New York 11971 Griffing Street, Cutchogue, New York SCTM # : 1000 - 102 - 05 - 9.3 Dear Mr. Orlowski : As per your request, I have reviewed the latest submission concerning the above referenced subdivision. The records provided by the applicant indicate that the proposed widening of Griffing Street was recorded in 1968. Since this is the case, my report, dated 2/23/96, suggested that there might be difficulty in locating new sidewalks and curbing would not be accurate. The new map submitted by the applicant, dated 10/16/96, has indicated the installation of a catch basin and culvert pipe to be constructed at the corner of School House Road and Griffing Street. This culvert would divert road run off into a low drainage area that is owned by the Town and will provide adequate storage capacity to handle the drainage requirements for the adjacent roads. Additional drainage systems for potential development of the property can and should be designed when the individual lots come up for site plan review. The applicant has also suggested that new sidewalks and curbing should not be installed until the first site plan is approved. The avenues by which you decide when and how to ensure construction of these items I will leave in your hands. However, I would like to suggest that any curbing required at the corner of School House and Griffing adjacent to the proposed Catch Basin should be installed with the drainage. The entire curb radius should be designed and constructed such that it will meet uniformly with future curbing. The last four to five feet of each end of the new curb should also be sectioned off and turned downward to prevent snow plows and other vehicles from inadvertent contact. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. i cerely, /1✓�/ James A/Richter, R.A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways) r7JAN3 ;te PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS QgOFF04C' O� OG Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARD P.O. Box 1179 Chairman COD Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. W ,* Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. O Telephone(516) 765-1938 WILLERS KENNETH L.EJ. DWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 26, 1996 Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. P.O. Box 424 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposed minor subdivision for William J. Baxter -Griffing Street SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Wickham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 25, 1996: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from November 16, 1996 to May 16, 1997. This additional extension has been granted to allow for review of the information received on November 6, 1996. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, 1 \df l� A Richard G. Ward ni f Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBF r^ SUfd({' • Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARimaWARDCha _J„�O Gy P.O. Box 1179 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. v c '4 Southold, New York 11971 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Fax(516) 765-3136 WILLIAM J. CREMERS Telephone (516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS �� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IVoven.be2 V 1996 James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: Lj'C'm T. Tax Map No.: 1000- io-).-S - 9.3 Street Location: 6r;4'&C sAfect Hamlet Location: Cvkcl oc„P Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated X Other l• 4e r + de (Dated 6 /4 ) Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Comments i Contact person: LAW OFFICES MS WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. 10315 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM MATTITLICK, LONG ISLAND MELVILLE OFFICE ERIC J. BRE55LER NEW YORK 11952 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM SUITE III LYNNE M.GORDON 516-298-8353 MELVILLE, NEW YORK 11747 JANET GEASA TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 516480 JEFFREY STARR TELEFAX NO.0. 516-516-249-9484 HUBERT F.SULLIVAN November 6, 1996 VIA FAX WITHOUT ENCLOSURES VIA MAIL WITH ENCLOSURES lr Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall WV 8 S% 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Sou��a1_ r;tii;� Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: William J. Baxter Minor Subdivision Griffing Street, Cutchogue, N.Y. Gentlemen: Approximately two weeks ago we furnished copies of the Proposed Final Subdivision Map to the Town Engineer and your office. Last week we furnished another copy of the map to your as your copy had also been sent to the Town Engineer. We also furnished the drainage calculations prepared by Mr. Van Tuyl. Please note that the map does indicate the actual location of Griffing Street pavement and sidewalks. Given the deeds of dedication which were recorded for the widening of Griffing Street, I do not believe that the pavement or sidewalk locations would be a problem. A copy of those deeds are enclosed. Given the large amount of site work that will be required in order to level, pave and otherwise develop the properties, we ask that the requirement of installation of sidewalks and curbing be deferred until the first site plan approval. This would avoid the need for extensive site work being done perhaps months or years prior to actual development of the property, or the posting of a bond in connection therewith. By requiring that the work for the entire frontage be done at the first site plan for any lot, rather than piecemeal at the time of the site plan for each lot, the Board could insure that all of the improvements would be installed at such time as any portion of the property is developed rather than lot by lot. Southold Town Planning Board Page Two I am advised that Mr. Richter is out of the office for several weeks. Accordingly, we request that the November 16th deadline be extended. Since the primary basis for our prior request for extension related to the actual location of Griffing Street paving and sidewalks, which now has been completed, we do not anticipate significant delays once the Engineer's review has been finalized. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Abigail A. Wickham WW:mh encl. 30-plbofc 6ma.r3i..r.>i.T.tl.Ywm ADe)1 CeLi0M—nrtNv�vA S,fe Ilwd wl,h no.mut,eJv,t C,�.. .A<tt-IvNridvJorCxponNw .. CONSULT T0U0.LAWY11i 11R0E1 SIGNING THIS INSTSUMINT•THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD IE USED IT LAWYERS ONLY 4z made the 16th dayot June ,niaetem hundred and sixty-two BETWEEN_ WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR.. and PATRICIA BAXTER, his wife, ( ing at Palmer Avenue, New Rochelle, New York, WILLIAM J. BAXTER, SR., residing at 10 Bayeau Road, New Roohelle, New York, ROBERT A. UOELL;+, \' JR.j �dnd'JANE P. GOELLER, his wife,.- residing at Biroh Lane, Greenwinh, �9 p Connecticut, W party of the first part and TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, a munio 1pal co rporation with Ir office at South Street, Greenport, Suffolk County, New York, party 61 the semnd part, -- WITNESSM t6t the party of the first part,to coadderuion of One and 00/100----------- -----------------------------------------------------($1.00)_•douars, '- - lawfut mosey of the United Sates, and other good and valuable considerationpaid `Lythe party of the Record part,does hereby grant Rod release unto the party of the second part,the heir Or suroessors and assigns of the party of the second past forever, PAROEL"I .ALL a�itath piof,pieee err parcel of(aed Iaiwte, { tytngandbeingimdhsatCdtchogues Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New Yorks bounded and described as followst BEGINNING at a monument at the westerly end of the northerly line of School House-Road - j Extension as dedicated July 21p .1960; running thence along the north- Orly line of the proposed extension of said School House Road - Exten-sion, S. 526 551 20" W6 170 feet) thence along other land of .Baxter two. oburseshas followst '(1) N,. 37°.041 40" W, 100,00.feetf thence (2) .N. 520 551 20" E. 170.00 feet to.land Of�Tyler; thence along said land of Tyler, S6 370 041 40" E. 100 feet to the point of beginning. ` IT.IS INTENDED that the above premises are granted and conveyed to the Town of Southold for highway drainage control purposes. PARCEL-TI . ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying Viand being at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the,.northerly end of the westerly line of Griffing Street as dedicated May 281 1958; running thence through land of Baxter three courses as follows: (1) N. 49° 341 )j0" W. 122.98 feeti thence (2) N. `38° 051 40" W- 635,81 635.81 feetf thence (3) N. 52° 551 20" E, 220100 feet to a monument I _ at the westerly end of the northerly line of°School House Road - Extension, dedicated July •21, 1960; thence across the westerly end of r IS x M i LM5189 FAa343 said School�House Road - Extension and along land of John Wickham, S, 370 041. 40^ E, 50 feetj �thenoe through land �of Baxter five courses as follows, (1) S; 52° 551 200 W, 144,10 feet; thence ,(2) on a curve to the left having s radius of 24.56 fast, a distance of 39.01 fee d thence (if S. 38° 051 401 E- 554.91.reet$ thenoe (4) S- 49° 341 40" E, 122.50 feet{ thence (5) S. 39° 091 200 E. 4,56 feet to the northwest- erly corner of,lana of Schneider, thence across the northerly end of said 4riffing Street, dedicated May 28, 195e,,_$, 50° 501. 401' W. 50.00 feet to the point of beginning, IT IS IHTEHDEDthat the above premisesare granted and conveyed to .the Toxn.of Southold for highway purposes, IT aund"d N.Y.a.t.U.Fo,m 1006.ifi/JM—Bnaan and SAe Deed.♦Loom Cwenm,,rdnn Cnma,i An,-Indbidwl m Cs,wnio�. CONSULT#OUR LAWTER 6ESORR SIONINO THIS tNSTRUMENT—THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD Re USED Ry LAWYERS ONLY. ✓;` N i�p�q 395 onE110 DENfUM made the 9th day of July nineteen hundred and sixty-ei Cat BN' WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. and PATRICIA BAXTER, his wife, residing at 31 Mohegan Road, Larchmont, New York, WILLIAM J. BA%TER,6A., residing at Nassau Point Road, CutchogueI New York, ROBERT A. GOELLER, JR. and JANE P. GOELLER, his wife, residing at Birch Lane, Greenwich, Connecticut, - party of the first part,and TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, a municipal corporation with office at South Street, Greenpertt Suffolk County, New York, party of the Second part, WTrNF3.SLM,that the party of the first part,in consideration of One and 00/100 ------------ ------------------------------------------------------------dollars, lawful money of the United Staten and other good and valuable considerationpaid by the party of the second part,does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part,the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the amend part forever, '%'-•''=i` - PARCEL ONE ALL(hat certain plot,piece or panel of land, situate, lying and being IrKaX at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING_at, a point on the southwesterly line of Griffing Street, 73.50 feet northwesterly along said southwesterly line from the Main Road, from said point of be- ginning running along land of the party of the first part, three coursest (1) •N. 42e 09' 00" W. - 358.97 feet; thence (2) N. 38° 32' 4011 W. - 640.91 feet; thence (3) N. 52° -55' 201: E. - 55.03 feet to land of the party of the second part; thence along said land S. 38e 05' 40" E. 5-0-feet to .the northwesterly line of School House Road; thence along said northwesterly line S. 52°. 55' 20" W. - 50.01 feet to the southwesterly line of Griffing Street; thence along said southwesterly-linea four courses: (1) S. 38° 05' 40" E. - 635.81 _ feet; thence. (2) S. 490 34' 40" E. - 122.98 feet; thence (3) S. 39° 09' 20" E,-50.17-feet; thence (4) S. 38" 04' 20" E. - 187.40 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL TWO . ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Cutchoguet Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, bounded and described as follows : BEGINNING at a`point on the '6395 PACE111 northeasterly line of GriffingStreet -294.93feet northwesterly along said northeasterly line from .the Main &Qad, !from.said point of be i:. V ginning running along eaid'northeasterly ;UP ,three courses (1) N..39° 091 20" W. - 4.56-feet; thence (2) N.'49° 340 4V W. - 122,50 e" .feet; thence (3) N, 380. 05' 40" W. - 554.91 feet; thence northeasterly r. ° ? on.a_curve to-the right.having a radius..'of'24,56.:rest a distance of 39.01 feet to the southeasterly line of School House Road; thence _ along.said southeasterly line N, 52° 55Y, 20" E...11+4,10. feet to land of John Wickham; thence along said land of Wickham, S. 37° 04' 40" E. -�- 5.0,feet; thence along lend. of the party of the;,first•part,-three it courses; (I)-S, 520 55' 20" W, 138,54.feet;.,thence`(2) Southwesterly on a curve to the left having a radius of 23,91 feet a distance of 38.62- feet; thence (3) 6.. 39° 39' 10" E. - 674,68. feet to the point of.beginning. ` IT IS INTENDED that the above two parcels are granted and con- 1- veyed to. the Town of-Southold for highway purposes,.. .p Y:5 Y' y` 6 0 0 s LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM 81 BRESSLER, P.C. 10315 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM MATTITUC K, LONG ISLAND MELVILLE OFFICE ERIC J. BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM SUITE III LYNNE M.GORDON 516-298-8353 MELVILLE,NEW YORK 11747 JANET GEASA TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 516-249-9480 JEFFREY STARR TELEFAX NO. 516-249-9484 HUBERT F.SULLIVAN October 29, 1996 Ms. Melissa Spiro Southold Town Planning Board P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Wm. J. Baxter Minor Subdivision Griffing Street, Cutchogue Dear Melissa: Enclosed is a copy of the survey in the above referenced matter showing the catch basin. Very ruly yours, Ufffgail A. Wickham 30-pingbd EL -T119LDT76N G 60AM) PLANNING BOARD MEMBA RICTown Hall, 53095 Main Road HARD G.WARD Q�' Off' Chairman 9 h� �Gy> P.O. Box 1179 o= < Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. 2 y Fax (516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. 4 WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone(516) 765-1938 9�IJO1 � �aO�,:-� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Or-t-o be.¢2.91 1996 James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: W;Na yw —Y. Tax Map No.: 1000- ioQ. - S- 9.3 Street Location: Gr;4k-;N�- S}r.et- Hamlet Location: C.*J"0auc Type of Application: X Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated 10/ 16 / 9g ) Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated / / ) Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Comments TL&e— resew nl re4tirc(TT ark Contact person: / rlL';ssA V o1 2n Submission Without a Cover Letter Seeder: GCI.i l WIC. Y M Sutrject: w ff) l�uXf �r SCTrr#: 1000- 102-- s- 9. 3 Date: 1*5-�q� Comments: I P 16t n i OCT25M SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD 0 Southold Town Planning Board 14 June 10, 1996 Review of Reports: Engineering: Mr. Ward: William Baxter - This minor subdivision is for 4 lots on 2.78 acres located on the northeast side of tariffin,gg St. and the southeast side of School House Rd. in Cutchogue. SCTM# 1oo6519.3. I see that the agent for the applicant is here. It's in regard to William Baxter and the engineering report. If you wish to address the Board, you may at this time. Abigail Wickham: My name is Abigail Wickham, on behalf of the applicant Mr. Baxter. The engineering report raised several types of questions, one of which revolved around the exact location of the Griffing St. improvements and the logistics of how the sidewalks and curbing should be laid out and should be properly shown on the map. We've asked the surveyor to research that further. I think the map is correct but we can add the detail that the Engineer requested, and that's under way. We'll also ask him to change the scale of the map so that it's a little more easily legible on a larger scale. The thing that I wanted to address the Board on however, was the drainage calculations. As you can see from the property, there is a lot of the property that's below the grade of the street, although there is an enbankment and a lot of work is going to have to be done on the drainage calculations within the site itself and any runoff or flow contained. What concerns me is the comment in the engineering report that the runoff from the adjacent street in front of the project also be addressed and I would like the opportunity to discuss that with the Town Engineer and the Town Highway Department because I think that that needs to be somewhat of a common effort. There's a very low spot over on the north side of Bergen St. - I think there's a sump there, I have to check with them on that - but I do think that's something that should not fall exclusively within the purview of the applicant. Mr. Ward: The purpose of tonight's resolution is basically to adopt the Engineering Inspector's report. It doesn't make it cast in stone but it at least sets the process, and those were your issues with it. So based on that is there a pleasure of the Board? Southold Town Planning Board 1s. June 10, 1996 Mr, Orlowski: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion to adopt the Engineering Inspector's report dated April 30, 1996. Mr. Cremers: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr, Edwards, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Those issues will be addressed to him from the minutes. Nancy Gilles: My husband is part owner of the abutting property and this is the first I ever heard anything about this and I don't know if the abutting owners would be notified of it or is it well along the way. I just happened to be here and hear it. Ms. Wickham: I'd be happy to show you the map and go over it with you. Ms. Gilles: Thank you. And the Town is not under any obligation to notify us? Mr. Ward: It will be in the process. There would be a sign put up on the site, yes. But the applicant's agent is here and also you could come into the Planning Board office and review the map. Ms. Gilles: My husband said he would. Mr. Ward: Is there anyone else on that project that would like to address the Board? If not, we'll go on to the next order of business. MAJOR INOR SUBDIVISIONS, LOT LINE CHANGES, SET OFF APPLICATIONS - E ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Lead Agency Coordination: Mr. Ward n & Patricia McCarvill This maj ubdivision is for 3 lots on 118,79 sq. ft. in Southold. SCTM# 1000-78-7-32. hat's the pleasure of the Board? PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARD Y `� Chairman V ti� Gym P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y Z Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS O �,� Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS CI 10 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 11 , 1996 Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. P.O. Box 424 Mattituck, NY 1 1952 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for William J. Baxter SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Wickham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town, Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 10, 1996: BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the Engineering Inspector's report dated April 30, 1996. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS* S � • RICHARD G.WARD � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Chairmanh� G'y� P.O. Box 1179 r° K Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. 2 W Fax(516)765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS x(%k- �, Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDSy�Q! PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 21, 1996 Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. P.O. Box 424 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Minor subdivision for William J. Baxter -Griffing Street SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Wickham: Enclosed please find a copy of the April 30, 1996 report from James Richter in regard to the above mentioned subdivision. The Planning Board will be formally adopting the report at the June 10, 1996 Planning Board meeting. Please feel free to call if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincer leyftMe , r� Planner 4 cc: James Richter, Engineering Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBE0 i RICHARD G.WARD �� CQ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Chairman P.O. Box 1179 o= < Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y2 4 Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS O �; Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 21, 1996 Abigail Wickham, Esq. P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for William J. Baxter SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Wickham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 20, 1996: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from May 16, 1996 to November 16, 1996. Please note that this is the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Wards Chairman oo RAYMOND L. ]AC S �� pry ]AW, S A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEERING INSPECTOR SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT • PECONIC LANE, PECONIC, N.Y. Fax. (516)-765-1750 'y4yo1 �ao�' Tel. (516)-765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER PB TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MIS APRIL 30, 1996 Richard G. Ward Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Wm. J. Baxter, Minor Subdivision Griffing Street, Cutchogue, N.Y. Dear Mr. Ward: As per your request, I have reviewed the letter from the Attorney's office representing the owners of the above referenced subdivision. The letter in question suggests that any road run-off from public streets must be handled by the Town of Southold. This has not been the case concerning recent subdivisions. Past practice will show that subdivision approval's have also required improvements to existing Town roads. Typical improvements would include additional asphalt pavement, curbing and the installation of drainage structures. I have discussed this matter with Mr. Jacobs and he has agreed that any required improvements that will be generated by the approval of a subdivision should be the responsibility of the developer. The second item mentioned in the letter concerns the location of property lines along Griffing Street. A site plan map large enough to indicate the proposed location of new curbs and sidewalks and their relationship to existing pavement lines and adjacent sidewalks fronting the Post Office will still be required. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. nc rely, James A. Ric ter, R.A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs - (Superintendent of Highways) MAY 1 6 1996 �u,Gf �s LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND WILLIAM WICKHAM MORTGAGE OFFICE NEW YORK 11952 ERIC J.BRESSLER 516-298-5300 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM 516-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.516-298-2012 LYNNE M.GORDON TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 HUBERT F.SULLIVAN JANET GEASA JEFFREY STARR May 15, 1996 VIA FACSIMILE AND MAIL Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 11971 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-102-5-9. 3 Dear Melissa: This is in reference to your letter of November 14, 1995 granting us an extension for sketch approval to May 16, 1996. We are now working on the letter of Mr. James A. Richter dated February 23, 1996. Unfortunately, we have not received the new survey which he requested with a minimum scale of 1"=301 . We would therefore, very much appreciate a further extension of six (6) months. Very c d'al y ours, i j ism c am WW:mh 30-plbdofc rMA % RD PLANNING BOARD MEMBER* gMFFO1k RICHARD G.WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Chairman /�� l/y�p P.O. Box 1179 -4 Southold, New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. BENNETT ORLOWSHI,JR. W Fax(516) 765-3136 WILLIAM J.CREMERS O Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Apr; Z 1996' James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: la,4eg 7, Tax Map No.: 1000- 102 -s-9.s Street Location: G..:r„� S4r Hamlet Location: (2 {-t aye Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated �C Other ZAz From A. / (Dated 3 / i8 /96 ) ✓ Comments �/[4.� /PLJiPG/ «,SPS YaiSF� .n �e{�er' 'nt raga r�9 Contact person: �p�,tstiSn, n • • MQP LAW OFFICES '`K WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.c. 106 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND WILLIAM WICKHAM NEW YORK 11952 MORTGAGE OFFICE ERIC J.BRESSLER 516-298-5300 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM 516-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.5 16-29 8-2012 LYNNE M.GORDON TELEFAX NO.516-298-8565 HUBERT F.SULLIVAN JANET GEASA JEFFREY STARR March 18, 1996 Southold Town Planning Board P. 0. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Wm. J. Baxter Minor Subdivision Griffing Street, Cutchogue Gentlemen: I would like to offer the following comments with respect to the Town Engineer's report to you dated February 23, 1996. As to the drainage calculations, those for handling of on-site drainage should be designed at the time of the site plan, as the volume will depend upon the actual development and parking layout. However, we would be agreeable to imposing a covenant or map notation at this time to make provision for same. Any road run-off from the public streets must be handled by the Town of Southold, and we would be glad to coordinate that with the Highway Department, again at the time of site plan. I believe the concerns expressed regarding the location of Griffing Street and the boundary lines have been largely addressed earlier in this file, and I would appreciate a short period in which to review those issues and provide the Board and the Town Engineer with the appropriate information. Very truly yours, Abigail A. Wickham 30-pingbd d! �4 J1, MAR 19Q% R SL'3i7HULG 101;liV PLANNING BOARD MEMBES StfFO(,t 0 RICHARD G.WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Chairman ti� Gy P.O. Box 1179 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. -� Southold, New York 11971 w 2 Fax (516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS Telephone (516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 19, 1996 Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. P.O. Box 424 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Minor subdivision for William J. Baxter SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Wickham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 18, 1996: BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the Engineering Inspector's report dated February 23, 1996. The Planning Board will be requiring curbing and sidewalks. Therefore, all information recommended in the report must be supplied in order to determine the best possible design for the proposed subdivision. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, 71 allelle Richard G. Ward of Chairman cc: James Richter, Engineering Inspector enc. o�gUfFOt�-co X15 RAYMOND L. ]A OBS �� rry ]&ES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERINTENDENT G ENGINEERING INSPECTOR SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT • ` PECONIC LANE, PECONIC, N.Y. Fax. (516)-765-1750 y�Ol # aV Tel. (516)-765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FEBRUARY 23, 1996 Richard G. Ward Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: William J. Baxter, Jr. - Minor Subdivision Griffing Street, Cutchogue, New York tOU FEB 2 7 1996 SCTM #: 1000 - 102 - 05 - 9.3 E. SOu„ FinFJD'•iiG EO9kD Dear Mr. Ward: As per your request, I have reviewed the latest submission for the above referenced project. Drainage calculations will be required. It will also be necessary to provide a drainage system of catch basins and leaching pools to handle the surface runoff from the site as well as the runoff from the adjacent streets fronting the project. A recent site inspection suggests that the location of this system should be at the intersection of Griffing Street and School House Road. If curbing and sidewalks are to be a requirement of the subdivision, the property lines of the adjacent parcel to the south east should be investigated. Some confusion exists as to whether or not Griffing Street was ever widened to sixty (60') feet. Evidence of the proposed dedication does exist, but I have not been able to determine if the required documentation was ever properly filed with Suffolk County. The deed description for the adjacent property to the south east of the project indicates that its north west property line extends out into the existing pavement area of Griffing Street. The plan submitted has a scale of(1"=100') and is too small to accurately indicate the relationship of the existing lines of pavement to property lines. A new plan should be provided with a minimum scale of (1"=30'). The site plan should also indicate the existing sidewalks and curbs in front of the Post Office to allow for a continuous alignment of any proposed new ones. Page 1 of 2 Richard G. Ward - Chairman - Planning Board FEBRUARY 23, 1996 William J. Baxter, Jr. - Minor Subdivision SCTM #: 1000 - 102 - 05 - 9.3 Page 2 of 2 If sidewalks are to be required, they will need to be placed within the existing street right-of-way. If actual property lines encroach on the existing pavement of the street, it will be necessary to reconstruct the road further to the south west side of the existing Griffing Street right-of-way. Since this will be the developer's responsibility, the dedication of additional property fronting on Griffing Street should also be considered as a more economical solution to moving the road. This will also require negotiating with the adjacent property owner. Mr. Terp is the owner of the adjacent property referenced above. He has contacted Mr. Jacobs on several occasions in the past to discuss the apparent encroachment of the road upon his property. The Cron property located to the south east of Mr. Terp's property is where the Post Office now stands. The existing sidewalks and curbing in front of the building apparently terminate on Mr. Terps property line. All of this information will need to be shown on the plan accurately to determine the best possible design for the proposed subdivision. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. Si erely, aures A. Richter, R.A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways) PLANNING BOARD MEMBER SUFFOt/k • �0 CO Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G.Chafinnan ARD h�O Gy P.O. Box 1179 c < Southold, New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATH",JR. CO2x Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. WILLIAM J.CREMERS O Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDSy�Ol �aO� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: Tax Map No.: 1000- toe - s 9.3 Street Location: Gr;Cc;N� s�Y«t Hamlet Location: Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated X Final Subdivision Map (Dated rz /As /9S ) Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other M p (Dated Comments rLO puJ 75 21rn� ca4(cavTf�� .�1 nu, incc a Q Contact person: • • ms LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND WILLIAM WICKHAM ERICJ.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 MORTGAGE OFFICE ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM 516-298-5300 516-298-8353 TELEFAX NO,516-298-2012 LYNNE M.GORDON TELEFAX NO.516-298-8565 HUBERT F.SULLIVAN JANET GEASA JEFFREY STARR January 25, 1996 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Melissa: Enclosed for your review are proposed covenants and restrictions pursuant to Planning Board approval, and a copy of the proposed final map. If they meet with your approval, we will submit the final maps and other items required for formal approval. -. Very truly trruly yoourrs, Abigail A. Wickham AAW:mh 30-plbdofc I ii mil 1 I' ` 1�? JAN 2 61196 1 ?�! I E_._._...___ Y S0i1TH JLD TOvItiV PLANNING B0,10 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS DECLARATION, made the day of January, 1996, by WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. , residing at 1030 E. Putnam Avenue, Greenwich, Connecticut, referred to as the Declarant. WHEREAS, the Declarant is the owner of certain real property situate at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, more particularly bounded and described as set forth in Schedule "A" annexed hereto, and WHEREAS, the Declarant has made application to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for approval to subdivide the said real property into four (4) parcels in a subdivision known as Minor Subdivision of Property surveyed for William J. Baxter, Jr. , and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of subdivision approval, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold has deemed it to be in the best interests of the Town of Southold and the owner and prospective owners of said parcels that the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on said parcels, and as a condition of said approval, said Planning Board has required that the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office, and WHEREAS, the Declarant has considered the foregoing and determined that the same will be for the best interest of the Declarant and subsequent owners of said parcels. I JAN 26 i SOilIHy_L TJ44iq F'l�SPu"-'dS ;)Al2D NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarant, for the purposes of carrying out the intentions above expressed, does hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said premises herein described shall hereafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers and holders of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to wit: 1. DECLARANT agrees and consents that at the time of Site Plan review of proposed construction of improvements on each of the lots, the Planning Board may condition its Site Plan approval on an internal parking area layout and common curb cuts, whereby internal access between the parking areas of the adjoining lots in the subdivision shall be provided. 2 . DECLARANT further agrees that the area on the filed map marked "Reserved for Possible Common Access", shall be available for and reserved for common driveway easements for access to each of the lots upon which the easement is located. Title to each of the lots in the subdivision shall be conveyed subject to an easement over the area shown for such purposes. 3 . In consideration of the Planning Board waiving the Park and Recreation fee permitted to be imposed under Section A106-38 (E) of the Town Code of the Town of Southold, the DECLARANT hereby covenants and agrees that the premises shall not be used for residential purposes without written resolution of the Planning Board approving such use, which resolution may include, without limitation, the requirement of the payment of a Park and Recreation fee in lieu of land for park and playground use under Section A106-38 (E) . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant above named has executed the foregoing Declaration the day and year first above written. William J. Baxter, Jr. STATE OF NEW YORK: :SS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: On the day of January, 1996, before me personally came WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed same. Notary Publ o re:C&Rsprkg ��S�FFO(K�O PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward, Chairman w x Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. T P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. y `may Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald ��,� ,1[. ����y Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards "�' Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 14, 1995 Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. P.O. Box 424 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Minor subdivision for William J. Baxter SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Wickham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 13, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from November 16, 1995 to May 16, 1996. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, &II'lliLl Richard G. Ward ms Chairman • • s 1106 LAW OFFICES /I C WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.c. / A� MAIN ROAD,P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND WILLIAM WICKHAM NEW YORK 11952 MORTGAGE OFFICE ERIC J.BRESSLER ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM 516-298-5300 516-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.516-298-2012 LYNNE M.GORDON TELEFAX NO.516-298-8565 JOSEPH C.SAVINO HUBERT F.SULLIVAN JANET GEASA JEFFREY STARR November 10, 1995 Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Mr. Ward: We are writing on behalf of the above applicant for an extension of sketch approval. Sketch plan approval in the above matter was granted on May 18, 1995 with certain conditions. Sketch plan approval was further conditioned upon submission of final maps within six months of the sketch plan approval, November 18, 1995. We are working on these items, and have devoted extensive time to consideration of the parking layout and cross easements. However, due to a delay in our survey work, we do not expect the maps to be finished by that date. Accordingly, an extension of time is hereby requested on behalf of the applicant for the submission of final maps. Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Ve atruly y ursW , A. is am AAW:mh 30-plbdofc �� i NOV 1 3 1995 Pd CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT 'F/ ,.esWsc,L i New Suffolk Road. PO Box 930. Cutchogue. NY 11935 r.e. Telephone (516) 734-6907• Fax (516) 734-7079 May 23, 1995 Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman - Southold Town Planning Bd. Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Ref: Wm J Baxter Dear Mr. Ward, Reference the above minor subdivision map. It is the opinion of the Board that a well is not required at this time. If there are any changes, please advise. Yours truly, Board of Fire Commissioners i Matthew J. Martin Secretary cc:R.M.Doroski LMAY 2 5 W' UPHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD o��SUFFO[�coG PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward, Chairman y x Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. y �\� Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald '�O( � Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Maw l R, 1995 Matthew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Mr. Martin: Enclosed please find two (2) surveysfor Wit JiQ,m S.�fkfk 'Ia. G�:1� NS SEr�ai SCTMw rom- roa- S - 9-3 Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by 1996. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, W w � Richard G. Ward '�� Chairman ��gOFFO(,I-�O PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS tk Richard G. Ward, Chairman y x Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. ^+ P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald y�Ol ���� Fax (516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 19, 1995 Abigail A. Wickham Wickham, Wickham S Bressler, P.C. Main Road, P.O. Box 424 Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Wickham: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Thursday, May 18, 1995: Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated March 16, 1994, with the following conditions: 1 . The location of existing paving on Griffing Street and School House Lane, in addition to all existing structures (i.e. utility poles, fire hydrants) must be shown on the final subdivision map. This information is requested because the Planning Board and Engineering Inspector will be viewing the site to determine the need for curbing, drainage, buffers and other typical subdivision improvements. 2. Prior to any final approval of the subdivision, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be filed stating that at the time of site plan review for each lot in the subdivision, the Planning Board may require an internal parking layout and common curb cuts. William J. Baxter May 19, 1995 Page 2 -Tnis proposed subdivision received conditional sketch approval on October 19, 1992. However, the final submission was not received within the required time frame and the application expired. Application materials were re-submitted on April 13, 1995. The Planning Board, by the resolution above, re-instated the conditional sketch approval. Since neither the proposed project nor the surrounding area have changed since the minor subdivision was originally proposed, the Planning Board is not conducting another review under SEQR. Thus, the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Board on November 23, 1992 is still in effect. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The final maps, six (6) paper prints and two (2) mylars must contain a current stamp of Health Department approval and must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. The maps required in condition number 1 of the conditional sketch approval must be submitted prior to the submission of the final maps for review by the Planning Board and Engineering Inspector. The original application was referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for review. The Commission determined that the subdivision was considered a matter for local determination. The Planning Board may require covenants and restrictions, in addition to the ones mentioned above, upon review of the revised map. You will be notified if any additional covenants and restrictions are required. The sketch plan has been referred to the Cutchogue Fire Department for their recommendation as to whether a firewell is necessary for fire protection. You will be notified if a firewell is required. The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that it is inadequate in size for a reservation of land for park and playground use. Therefore, a cash payment in lieu of land reservation will be required as per Section A106-38 (E) of the Town Code. The amount to be deposited with the Town Board shall be $8,000.00 (two thousand dollars per vacant lot in the subdivision). The park and playground fee will be waived if a covenant is placed on the subdivision stating that the lots will not be used for residential purposes. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, / �J /f� Richard G. Ward1 Chairman LAW OFFICE WICKHAM, WICKHAM & SLER, P. MAIN ROAD, P.O. MATTIT UC K, LON D ��I-q WILLIAM WICKHAM NEW YORK II 52 MORTGAGE OFFICE ERIC J.BRESS LER -5300 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM ��1 AX NO. 16-298 516-298-8 3 T'W.WM TELEFAX NO.516-298-2012 LYNNE M.GORDON TELEFAX NO. 516-29 - JOSEPH C.SAVINO HUBERT F.SULLIVAN JANET GEASA JEFFREY STARR April 13 , 1995 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Ms. Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM: #1000-102-5-9 . 3 Dear Melissa: Enclosed is our check to the order of Southold Town Clerk in the sum of $1,500. 00 as you requested, for re- submitting the application for plat approval in the above referenced matter. Very Aruly yours, Wickham�PigailA. AAW:mh 30-plbdofc r /; �,' \`!( LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.c. MAIN ROAD,P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK.LONG ISLAND WILLIAM WICKHAM MORTGAGE OFFICE NEW YORK 11952 ERIC J.BRE55LER 516-298-5300 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM 516-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.516-298-2012 LYNNE M.GORDON TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 JOSEPH G SAVINO HUBERT F.SULLIVAN JANET GEASA JEFFREY STARR 1995 Ms. Melissa Spiro ! Southold Town Planning Board �� i+I Town Hall ! P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLDTOVIIN PLANNING BOARD Re: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM # 1000-102-5-9. 3 Dear Ms. Spiro: The above referenced application received Sketch Plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board on October 20, 1992, which approval has expired. Pursuant to your instructions, an application is being re-submitted for your consideration. Enclosed please find the following: 1. 12 surveys of the proposed minor Subdivision. 2. Legal description of the subject property. 3 . Application for plat approval. 4. Form letter regarding drainage, grading and road construction. 5. Part I of the Full Environmental Assessment Form. 6. Copy of tax map. 7 . Planning Board Questionnaire. Also enclosed for your information, are copies of the Negative Declaration granted by the Town of Southold on November 23 , 1992 and the Suffolk County Department of Planning's November 30, 1993 letter declaring the application a matter of local determination. Upon submission of the original application, the filing and inspection fees in the amount of $3 , 000. 00 were paid. The application was seriously delayed due to proceedings with the Health Department and unfortunately the prior `1 Planning Board approval expired. However, since the current �Q• c'ev�e�ec� a�. 3�o,oI9S u�oe� cess inn . IJeu� a Qir-A n -�ee 'Is ce%Uvea . 1 Q. w"1\ ak s>w Mhz r� /115. LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. MAIN ROAD,P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND WILLIAM WICKHAM NEW YORK 11952 MORTGAGE OFFICE ERIC J.BRESSLER 516-298-5300 ABIGAILA.WICKHAM 516-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.516-298-2012 LYNNE M.GORDON TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 JOSEPH C.SAVINO HUBERT F.SULLIVAN JANET GEASA JEFFREY STARR IY\daJA 3 V Ms. Melissa Spiro Southold Town Planning Board rMM Town Hall � 13 M Ell P. 0. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Re: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM # 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Ms. Spiro: The above referenced application received Sketch Plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board on October 20, 1992, which approval has expired. Pursuant to your instructions, an application is being re-submitted for your consideration. Enclosed please find the following: 1. 12 surveys of the proposed minor Subdivision. 2 . Legal description of the subject property. 3 . Application for plat approval. 4 . Form letter regarding drainage, grading and road construction. 5. Part I of the Full Environmental Assessment Form. 6. Copy of tax map. 7. Planning Board Questionnaire. Also enclosed for your information, are copies of the Negative Declaration granted by the Town of Southold on November 23, 1992 and the Suffolk County Department of Planning's November 30, 1993 letter declaring the application a matter of local determination. Upon submission of the original application, the filing and inspection fees in the amount of $3,000.00 were paid. The application was seriously delayed due to proceedings with the Health Department and unfortunately the prior Planning Board approval expired. However, since the current Ms. Melissa Spiro Southold Town Planning Board Page Two application is the same as the prior, we ask that the Board consider granting relief from the payment of the filing and inspection fees with this re-submitted application. Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, Abigail A. Wickham AAW:mh encl. 30-Baxtgfng Nations Title It of New Yut,. SCHEDULE A (Description) All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northeasterly line of Griffing Street distant 403.98 feet northwesterly from the intersection of the northwesterly line of Main Road with the northeasterly line of Griffing Street, said point being where the northwesterly line of land now or formerly of Terp intersects the northeasterly line of Griffing Street; RUNNING TIONCE from said point of beginning along the northeasterly line of Griffing Street North 39 degrees 38 minutes 20 seconds West 567.54 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE along a curve bearing right having a radius of 23.91 feet a distance of 38.63 feet to a point on the southeasterly line of School }louse Road; RUNNING THENCE along the southeasterly line of School House Road North 52 degrees 55 minutes 20 seconds East 138.54 feet to a )pint; RUNNING THENCE along land now or formerly of Gemma the following two courses and distances: 1 . South 40 degrees 15 minutes 20 seconds East 492.43 feet; 2. North 52 degrees 53 minutes 50 seconds East 57.53feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE along land now or formerly of Case South 37 degrees 50 minutes 10 seconds East 100.00 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE along land now or formerly of Terp South 52 degrees 50 minutes 50 seconds West 223.24 feet to a point on the northeasterly line of Griffing Street, the point or place of BEGINNING. 67 1 N-ANNING BOARD MEMBERS 4 * SCOTI' L HAP Bennett O lowskt, Jr., Chairman Com. ?"� Supccvclor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. a( YY �uc.har(! G. Ward `?r;�,zI� Town Hall, 51095 t :-;; 13 Ic (:ii6) i5J 1938 1)aCtlei C. ROSS Wi.c!-,ham, Wickham 4 11.0. Box 1424 ..,3attitugk, CiY .ii`... J . Baxtcr, Jr. uslff '.. ._ . t ^et, Cutchogue SCT11;1-000-102-5-9 . 5 Dear Mr. Ross: The following resolution was adopted 'ay the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 23 , 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Qua] :t.ty Review Act, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. The project calls for moderate density land use, in a manner which is consistent with Town zoning. The project does not contain any unique natural or human environmental resources. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very trul'r yours, Bennett Orlowski, r. "15 Chairman Encl. y0 „' ��o�ogUFFO(,�coGy C1 y = PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS� � Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ��j `�� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, New Yorkk 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance November 23, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Arti ::le 8 (State EnvJ_ronmental Quality Review Act) of the Er.aixonmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Na,Ta of Action: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. SCTM# : 1000-102-5-9 .3 Location: Southeast of the intersection of. School House Road and Griffing Street, Cutchogue. S SSR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X ) Cc� .,,iIioncd Negative Deciaration: Yes ( } No iinor. Subdivision of 2 .78 acre paiccl ii: t .e i:a.mlet Business District into 4 lots. Page 2 William J. Baxter, Jr. SEQR Negative Declaration Con't. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment has been submitted and reviewed, it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The project callsfor moderate density land use, in a manner which is consistent with Town zoning. The project does not j contain any unique natural or human environmental resources. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: ( 516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Ser,rices Suffolk County Planning Commission Roger Evans, DEC Commissioner Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant COUNTY OF SUFYJLK 'I r I ROO[RT J.GAFPNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY MCUTIVIC DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR M. ANN DI�RCTOR O/FL�NNiht{ ." s ! November 30. 1992 t; ri Mr.. Bennett Orlowski. Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board Main Road Southold. NY 11971 F, Plat NAme: William J. Baxter, Jr. E` Tax Map Na. : 1000-101-5-M "? i { sCDP File No-2 S»SD--9:-07 S Dear Mr, Orlowski; Pursuant to the requirements of section A14-241 Article XIV of the Suffolk'`; .( County Administrative Code, the above captioned proposed final plat which has a''` been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a '4a matter for lnza_1 dizt ' ^' `;o"-: h0wa'Jer, this stall not be construed that the COAUT.1.n8i0n het8 f:i lc - -• C•'r '-�. nrj°fit 7V..s �.3 particu?_ez (I CVtments; .r•.rna; :,121 (;f;T'F.b:S 'i 3. t SEs Frank Dov in Senior Plan21er Sub divis!an Review Division ffD:u�b I 0NZ3S 335 v y e•., +•o � r r 'Q, ^ !ap) ,,•..,.(.•qua � f£ ..., i _ � _ ± O e z. car � ✓ E G .a ria O1 Pn Y S b d ! - ,. �/ �Ol 111 pWl• 'y -w+� \�' ~ V ko aArf � < jar., •a . >dti .3� i � r. 4ep) 'tr to✓ + w� c = �°FFO�.. Y � ' ter. rr .r . • 5� e � Q ' ` t rS' ✓ }i) , ryas' SY fr a yv ,a`,b•e• ,f • 'f 1 ♦ d� a •y�c�'+. i • i O •�°• , •,° ,� i 9yhaa r • ••+ . b� NMOtl� ,.: 1 1 6 � � ., <• a i ,'•.. III I zy. o w y I•,' - 00 I n t l • b♦;`400 + { ��. 8^ ', O tl; ijS I 4y0 r CA- THERINTE MBsrANO, IN* �a AssetManagement i�?S Real Esfate Consultant App 20 1994 Melissa Spiro Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 _ Re: Proposed Mmor Subdivision William J. Baxter, Jr. SCTM#.1000-102-05-9.3 Dear Ms. Spiro: It is respectfully requested that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an extension of sketch plan approval for the above referenced application. Your consideration is greoily appreciated Very truly Yours, Catherine A. Me sisno, President yo:vc` (2. MeaW o af)A. rA.It,:J' a y�ca «g0 fec�. APR 2 21994 D —WH—OLD TOWN rIAtININC BOARD P.O.Box 1951 • Riverhead.New York 119010964 516.727.1354 I SudFc� COUNTY OF SUFFOLK MS ROBERT J.GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING November 30, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Plat Name: William J. Baxter, Jr. Tax Map No. : 1000-102-5-9.3 SCDP File No. : S-SD-92-07 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Pursuant to the requirements of Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the above captioned proposed final plat which has been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination; however, this shall not be construed that the Commission has either approved or disapproved this particular plat. Comments: 1. Coordinated traffic circulation, parking, ingress and egress should be considered. 2. All stormwater runoff should be recharged on site by adequate drainage structures so that it will not flow out onto Main Road (S.R. 25) . 3. Appropriate vegetative buffers should be maintained. i Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz ;. DEC - 4 1992 Director of Planning SIB Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division FD:mb H.LEE DENNISON BUILDING ■ VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY • HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788 ■ (516) 853-5192 I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman y ® 0\� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �R' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November 24, 1992 Daniel C. Ross Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, P.C. P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-5-9. 5 Dear Mr. Ross: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 23 , 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. The project calls for moderate density land use, in a manner which is consistent with Town zoning. The project does not contain any unique natural or human environmental resources. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, r. 15 Chairman Encl. • �OSUfF O �COG cz r<' y� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y ' '' me �+- SCOTT eL.r HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman � �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance November 23, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. SCTM# : 1000-102-5-9.3 Location: Southeast of the intersection of School House Road and Griffing Street, Cutchogue. SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No ( X) Description of Action: Minor Subdivision of 2.78 acre parcel in the Hamlet Business District into 4 lots. • • Page 2 William J. Baxter, Jr. SEAR Negative Declaration Cont. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment has been submitted and reviewed, it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The project callsfor moderate density land use, in a manner which is consistent with Town zoning. The project does not contain any unique natural or human environmental resources. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board . Telephone Number: ( 516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Roger Evans, DEC Commissioner Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant CRAMER, VSOCIATES `�/v ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS t°6 r1S November 16, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road -- P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Review of EAF for Minor Subdivision Nov 18 1992 William J. Baxter,Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogguue SCTM No. 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per the your request,we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with your request. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part 77 LEAF The Part H LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Environmental and Planning Considerations The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The site consists of 2.39 acres and is located immediately southeast of the intersection of School House Road and Griffin& Street, Cutch2gue. The proposed subdivision involves dividing the 2.39 acre parcel into four lots. The minimum lot size is 22,000 square feet, and the remaining three (3) lots are 27,000 square feet. The site is zoned"HB"Hamlet/Business zoning, and all lots conform to zoning. The subject parcel is comprised of relatively flat topography and subsoils are characterized as sand with no impediment to leaching capability The depth to groundwater is approximately 26 feet, and there are no wetlands or unique flora or fauna associated with the site. The site is dominated by pioneer species and first growth woods associated with an overgrown field which was cleared some time in the past 20 years and is since revegetating. The site is within the North Fork Water Budget Area, and no community or public water supply is available. Therefore, the site will have to rely on private water supply. The area including the sub'ect site is sub'ect to shallow aquifer contamination from farming activities, and theorth Fork ater Supply Plan identifies the area groundwater as having nitrate concentrations in excess of 8 mg/1 and aldicazb concentrations in excess of 7 ug/1. The subject use should ensure that adequate water Page 1 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Baxter Subdivision Long EAF Review suppl can be provided. Application for a realty subdivision must be filed with Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) . The proposal calls for lots of less than 40,000 square feet, and an area where community water supply is not available, and therefore may require a variance from the SCDHS Board of Review. The project calls for a moderate density land use, in a manner which is consistent with Town zoning. The pro ect site does not contain an unique natural or human environmental resources. The project is an unlisted action involving creation of four (4) lot subdivision. In view of the foregoing facts, the proposed project is not expected to cause a significant environmental impact, and there does not appear to be a need to require the preparation of a Draft EIS. Therefore, the Planning Boazd could consider the issuance of a Negative Declazation for this project. Compliance with SCDHS requirements for use density for adequate groundwater protection, and the need to provide adequate water supply 0thsite should be ensured through coordination with SCDHS. If you have an questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter,please do not hesitate to call. Very trul you azles J. Voorhis,CEP,AICP CRAMER, VOCIATES Paget ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS 14% -2 (2 87'1-7c 617.21 ' � SEAR Appendix A j4 State Environmental Duality Review k' FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM=���g�i MV 1 8 1992 S.�icy Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderli/ m nner wh tbera project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not al ys easy 6dl answer. Frequent ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understo wJhe determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: X Part 1 �W Part 2 CPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: C A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. at Griffing Street, Cutchogue Name of Action Planning Board for the Town of Southold Name of Lead Agency l3e n 17G t� I'rlrr 1 Ow 5 k� , 52 . '��w►a-rte Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Re %i ,1 . Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency gnatureof Pr rer(ifdit tfrom responsible officer) �x Ib 1gC42 '• t Date SCUTHULDTGGN y P1 AMtiL":(',BCAP,D 1 ' VR7f —PROJECT INFORMATf9,[d C o Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION !Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter Jr. :JCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Griffing Street, Cutchohue, Suffolk Count NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE William Baxter, Jr. (2031 637-4559 ADDRESS 11030 East Putnam Avenue I CITY/PO STATE - ZIP CODE :Greenwich CT 06830 BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER Ilf different) same ADDRESS 1 CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE I i DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Minor Subdivision of real property - in TO 4 "L"JTS ,Vh CGI LU! k.itwol �S �Co� y4T 4 L ATS/2 -77/w.5= , Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ACommercial ,Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture &Other vacant- 2. acant2. Total acreage of project area: 2.78 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 2.78 acres 2.78 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated lRock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? AQ fie,F�• !�' Rd�3 a Soil drainage ❑Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site [J-Poorly drained % of site See Test Hole Data Sheet dated 8/21/91 b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? MA acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes 2No a. What is depth to bedrock? MA (in feet) 2 S.' Approximate percentage of prop%ce�( ce with slopes. CO-10% Ir 10-15% % :....15% or-g� % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? _Yes XX 'o 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes hx.No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 27' (in feet) VLCCof7 D tv%C 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? )(Yes ❑No -gg--Iggtppr, 10. Do hunting. fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist irrthe project area? =Yes LDINO 11. Does project site contain any species of p,1,4nt or animal lifethat is /yd'�entified as threatened or endangered? El KNo According to Lra mer,�'rx�Y1115 nt r� I n UeST1p2M(;iJ Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes ®No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes R'NO If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes YNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: none a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary NA 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name NA b. Size (In acres) NA 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ❑Yes NNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ❑Yes ❑No NA b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes ❑No NA 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes acNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes ZNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes 2No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 2.78 acres. ,)1F b. Project acreage to be developed: �?.7Q agrees initially; � o a acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 2�r � acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) NOT APPROPRIATE e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed NA %. f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing �0 �►- proposed 0 8 - g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and tvpe of housing units: ** . One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately ZZ/-)4-i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; — length.NA j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 700 ftapproximate See attached Plan h pothc-ncAl $rrvAnwi T�os�rbl� t vELoPrt+r/�r- li'f �UTui2� . Ta 86 PiF7—EUt.110ED 2. How much natural materialock, 'Cn, etc.) will be removed fres tet .i ton, cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? 9fYes ❑No ioN/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? NA LANDSC-AP tnS b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? PYes ONO NA c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? {<Yes ❑No NA To aE Lt7�7,e"//Ir2> 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 01- 2. acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes ENO 40 la q 5 /07–S 4tZC- 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction NA months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: NA a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes ®No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction NA after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes ONO If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ®No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount NA b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged NA 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? IK1'es 5c7No Type NA -'!ii4A9(7A2!J EFS/uEn�T 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ®No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes ,'KNo D.0 not know. 16. Will the project generate solid waste? %Yes ®No Ohe_n 5aBDIVI6IOt's IS DEA1CL4bPE'1") a. If yes, what is the amount per month NA L,;I& tons b. If yes, will an existing solid w-ste facility be used? 9Yes ONO NA ' � n c. If yes, give name NA location NA ��tC �IOALA e– d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Wes ❑No NA e. If Yes, explain NA M A%0Db,'(G p ZC5cG CcLbkif ►h0.T�¢ L S 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes ®No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? NA tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? NA years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes ®No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes ZNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes [RNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? '®Yes ®No W hr– V1 1DeJe Lope M If yes , indicate type(s) NA EJC_c_TiV_CG ;:70SZi k LS 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity NA gallons/minute. 1 BE DEC2ndlhed 23. Total anticipated water usage per day NA gallons/day. 300/,9 /Pa 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes ®No If Yes, explain NA 4 25.' Approvals Required: •� �� Submittal TYP Date City, Town, Village Boa;;! -'Yes 9:No faty, Town, Vikxgix Planning Board KlYes []No Subdivision Approval 12/18/91 City, Town Zoning Board Dyes ENo City, County Health Department Eyes ❑No Approval of Realty Subdivision 11/22/91 Other Local Agencies ❑Yes KNo Other Regional Agencies Eyes _No Suffolk County Planning Commission State Agencies Dyes 9)No Federal Agencies ❑Yes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? *-Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit %,subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑rescurce management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Tt HB (1u1+ k-e T- t V-\G S:Z, 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? four lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? NA 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zonin�4? - De end - See Town Bulk Schedule annexed hereto �S�o �oTCovE2-ac�Q -ofSRYZe� hIou--c- 3o i OTA iD ��3� �z�g/jA 35 o.Jra Jf 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted focal land�use plans? Eyes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/ mile radius of proposed action? Commercial, Residential, School Church 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoin ingisurrounding land uses within a Y. mile? Eyes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 24,391 a Q_,©pQ 10 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ❑t No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? .Yes F:No - a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? )<Yes ❑No NA 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes KNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No NA D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to t ee be Cy kn wlledge Wi•ckha Wickham & Bressler P. . on be�ialt of Applicant,/S ns r N i1lidM .1 Baxter, Jr Date I Lct� Signature �c21. Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Pari-VOLT IMPACTS AND TH'(-SAGNN. LIDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing type's of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO RYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ []Yes []No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.;<NO OYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 r 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) XNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes []No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existior new body of water? or DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water Cl ❑ ❑Yes []No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ANO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ E]Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns or surface water runoff? *0 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 7 ' T • `i � � �� Ito 3 SmPotential Can Impact Be ModLarge Mitigated By ImImpact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? )((NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ _ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ E-1 Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? )(NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ [1 Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? XNO ❑YES Examples !hat would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? )CNO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? .ANO ❑YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ,)ANO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 6NO ❑YES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑Yes ❑No 11 1:1 • Other impacts: ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 3 IMPACT O$ANSPORTATION (Imall tn' Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation sy; ems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ,NNO ❑YES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ 13 Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 1-1 Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? KINO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? P(NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ E]Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Cl ❑ 1:1 Yes []No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe �k1y7 O OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑NO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No 10 IMPACT ON GROH AND CHARACTER "103E]Yes 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD ial Can Impact Be 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the exist' community? e Mitigated By �NO OYESt Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%, 1:1 ❑Yes ❑No• The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating serviceswill increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. ❑Yes ❑No• Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals.• Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑Yes ❑No• Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures El ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. ❑ ❑Yes []No • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) :"❑ 11 Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. EJ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? NO OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS - Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impacts) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) SU�1=its J CRAMER, Vi` ; �� •CIATES • '1S ENVIRONMENAJG CONSULTANTS November 16, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Boz 1179 1ETR0k# Southold, Na 11971 Re: Review of BAP' for Minor Subdivision -'uV 1 William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogue SUUTHUTU'J!N I`: SUM No. 1000-102-5-9.3 rPLANNINGG BU RD Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per the your request,we have comple :ed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with your reqs est asks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part 1 LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by C VA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same 1 ; attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The fart lI LEAF checklist has been cot tpfeted and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is it eluded below. 3. Environmental and Planning Considerati(,u The parcel has been inspected and envir mniental references concernin the site and area :nave been consulted. The site cons sts of 2.39 acres and is located immediately southeast of the inters-Iction of School Fouse Road and Griffin Street, Cutcho ue. The proposed subdivision involves dividi ig the 2.39 acre parcel into four lots. The minirnum lot sire is 22,000 square feet, a id the remaining three (3) lots are 27,000 square feet. The site is zoned "HB" Han let/Business zoning, and all Iots conform to zoning. The subject parcel is comprised of relati ely flat topographand subsoils are characterized as sand with no impedime )t to leaching capability. The depth to grouridwater is approximately 26 feet, and there are no wetlands or unique flora or fauna. associated with the site. The site i i dominated by pioneer species and first growth woods associated with an overgrc wn field whit was cleared some time in the past 20 years and is since revegetating. The site is within the North Fork Water 3udget Area, and no community or public water supply is available. Therefore, the site wail have to rely on private water supply. The Berea including the subject site is sub,ect to shallow aquifer contamination from farming activities, and the North Fork %A ater Supply Plan identifies the area groundwater as having nitrate concentra ions in excess of 8 mg/1 and aldicarb concentrations in excess of 7 ug/1. The .object use should ensure that adequate water Page 1 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MIL .ER PLACE, NY 11764 (5166) 331.1455 � - • Baxter Subdivision Long EAF Review suppply can be provided. Application for a realty subdivision must be filed with SuffotN:County Department of Health Sei✓ices (SCDHS) , The proposal calls for lots of less than 40,000 square feet, and an are i where community water supply is not available, and therefore may require a vas lance from the SCDHS Board of Review. The project calls for a moderate density i, nd use, in a manner which is consistent with Town zoning. The project site does not con ain an unique natural or human environmental resources. The project is an uniis ed action involving creation of four (4) lo' subdivision. In view of the foregoing facts, the p:oposed project is not expected to cause a significant environmental impact, and there does not appear to be a need to require the preparation of a Draft EIS. Therefore, the Plain ing Board could consider the issuance of a Negative Declaration for this project. Complian �e with SCDHS requirements for use density for adequate groundwater protection, an 1 the need to provide adequate water supply to the site should be ensured through coordination with SCDHS. If you have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matt ar, please do not hesitate to call. Very trul your Arles J. Voorhis,CEP,AICP CRAMER, Ve; C SOCIATES Paget ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS .�^ fi J e n .—. — � ,.• .ems. C , 11 J fl .l h � J a ,,, Y. . � � .� • .� � .. .� , . r _ rJ T — h fl 4J �5 CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT * New Suffolk Road, PO Box 930, Cutchogue, NY 11935 r,o. Telephone (516) 734-6907 • Fax (516) 734-7079 November 1, 1992 Mr Bennet Orlowski, Jr. Southold Town Planning Bd. Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Ref. Wm. J. Baxter properties Dear Mr. Orlowski, Reference the above estate and map. It is the opinion of the Board that a well is not required at this time. If there are any changes, please advise. Yours truly, Board of Fire Commissioners Matthew J. Martin Secretary mjm/ PLry � d i u J:P �o�OSUFFO(�i'�O CD PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti Z ' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman J a� `�..e.- Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �l �a Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 ©orber ao. 199?. Mathew Martin, Secretary )� Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Lane 1 y; NOV! � _ 4 Cutchogue, New York 11935 u'•' __r.,.. 1 Dear Mr. Martin: Enclosed please find ( 2) surveys 15r� iNc \ �po� in Fri c o SC=rg*- 1000 X02 S 93 . Please notify this office as to whether any fire wells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. CZ beleve -ftleft 'is an �P4�5�� we.11 an -t1Ne siEe � Please reply by au 3 , 1992. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours Be ne t Orlo2 , Jr./ ,,, Chairman enc. =�;;EsVEG GCT 22199. • • SuBG� MS •` I-AW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.c. MAIN ROAD, P.O. ROX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 MORTGAGE OFFICE ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM 516-298-5300 516-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.516-298-2012 DANIEL C.ROSS TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 LYNNE M.GORDON JOSEPH C.SAVINO HUBERT F.SULLIVAN October 19, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attention: Ms. Holly Perrone .cct_.,.4, Re: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogue, New York SCTM No. 1000/102/5/9.3 Dear Holly: Enclosed is Mr. Baxter's check in the amount of $400. 00 for the environmental revision. V ry , V. Rossrs DCR:ic baxplan79 S ,I i 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, �m~ O�� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Oj , a 0�1 Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 21, 1992 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Minor Subdivision William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Messrs. Cramer and Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hearby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Also enclosed are: 1 . Sketch plan dated February 24, 1992; 2 . Planning Board resolution dated October 20, 1992. The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on October 19, 1992. The $400. 00 review fee has been submitted by the applicant. If all is in order, the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the November 23, 1992 public meeting. Please submit your report no later than November 16th in order for the Board to review it before the meeting date. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Verriy, truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. '4t5- Chairman Encls. 1 ,u�F01,f PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ' F SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman O ".• -i.>'` �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. , <.�� - ��J f' p Richard G. Ward e t _ %� Town Hall. 53095 Main ROaC Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 20, 1992 Daniel C. Ross Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, P.C. Main Road P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision of William J. Baxter -. Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-5-9 . 3 Dear Mr. Ross: The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 19, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated February 24, 1992, with the following conditions: 1. The location of paving on Griffing Street and School House Lane and any structures (i.e. utility poles, fire hydrants) shall be shown on the final map. 2. An internal parking layout and common curb cuts may be required as a condition of final approval for the proposed lots at the time of site plan review for each lot. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. Five ( 5) paper prints and two ( 2) mylars of the final map, all containing a current stamp of Health Department approval, must be submitted before a final Public hearing will be set. Page 2 William J. Baxter, Jr. Please rote that the Planning Board has referred this subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for their review. You will be notified should covenants and restrictions be required. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly //yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. pct Chairman r 13.16-2 (2.87)-7c 617.21 � � SEOR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be.significant is not always easy to answer Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. .. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 CPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Cl B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. at Griffing Street, Cutchogue Name of Action Planning Board for the Town of Southold Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Re 5 , Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signatureof Preparer(lfdit tfrom responsible office_r) t Date SOUIHo-D 10VIN PI AMti1;:6 _QA F�D 1 PAR —PROJECT INFORMATI0 • Prepared by Project Sponso NOTICE This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and maybe subject to further verification and public review Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION - IMinor Subdivision for William J. Baxter Jr. _'CATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Griffing Street, Cutchohue, Suffolk Count NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE William Baxter, Jr. 1203 637-4559 ADDRESS 1030 East Putnam Avenue i CITY/Po STATE ZIP CODE :Greenwich CT 06830 NAME OF OWNER lif diHerent) BUSINESS TELEPHONE same I r ADDRESS I CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE I i DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Minor Subdivision of real property Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture NOther vacant 2. Total acreage of project area: 2.78 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 2.78 acres 2.78 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland rFreshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated lRock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a Soil drainage Well drained 100 % of site CModerately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained % of site See Test Hole Data Sheet dated 8/21/91 b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? NA acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? []Yes 52No a. "'hat is depth to bedrock? MA (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of propos ,e�.te with slopes _0-1090 _ ' 10-15% % _.15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? --Yes xNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes 27No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 27' (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes GNo Do not know. 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist imthe project area? =Yes IRNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes KNo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes �9No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes GINo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes HNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: none a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary NA 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name NA b. Size (In acres) NA 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Dyes NNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Dyes ❑No NA b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes ONO NA 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes actio 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes Ig No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes IRN0 B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 2.78 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0 acres initially; 0 acres ultimately. C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 2.78 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) NOT APPROPRIATE e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed NA %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 proposed 0 - g Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 0 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: NA One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length.NA j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 700 ftapproximate 3 See attached Plan 2. How much natural material li eck, t( n, etc.) will be removed frci h tet _Cton;,cubic vards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaime r Dyes ❑No KN/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? NA b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑No NA c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑No NA 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes MNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction NA months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: NA a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ❑No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes EENo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction NA after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes LNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ®No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount NA b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged NA 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes KINo Type NA 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ®No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes ❑No Do not know. 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes ®No a. If yes, what is the amount per month NA tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No NA c. If yes, give name NA ; location NA d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑No NA e. If Yes, explain NA 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes (@No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? NA tons/month. b. if yes, what is the anticipated site life? NA years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes NNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes 9No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes NNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Dyes ®No If yes , indicate type(s) NA 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity NA gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day NA gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Oyes ®No If Yes, explain NA 4 25. Approvals Required: �^ Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village 5;.arJ '—Yes KNo f=, Town, VaxgmPlanning Board 9]Yes ONO Subdivision Approval 12/18/91 City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ENO City, County Health Department Eyes CNo Approval of Realty Subdivision 11/22/91 Other Local Agencies Dyes KNo Other Regional Agencies 5a Yes ZINo Suffolk County Planning Commission State Agencies Dyes ZIINO Federal Agencies Dyes ZINo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? 2Yes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit :Esubdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑rescurce management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? HB 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? four lots_ 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? NA 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Depends — See Town Bulk Schedule annexed hereto 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? FlYes ONO 7. What are the predominant land uses) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? Commercial, Residential, School, Church 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/, mile? ]Yes ONO 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 24,391 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes KNo 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? =Yes ENO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? =Yes ONO NA 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes KNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ONO NA D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my kn w1e ge Wickham Wickham & Bressler P.Con beRal of I a Applicant/Sp ns r N JilliaALJ Ba>Lr, Jr1Date Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Parve 0-i"CT IMPACTS AND TH:�'-' 1613N1, UDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing type's of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for'any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cure ative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to-a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ (--]Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO DYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) Impact Impact Project Change ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable atea of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of,a ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes C1 No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes []No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Cl ❑ El Yes []No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ []Yes El No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water' in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ Dyes C]No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 7 • ` 1 j�-2 -3 Small to Potential Can Impact. Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. - ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO OYES Examples !hat would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 r Small to Potential :Can Impact Be Moderate Large itigated By Impact Impact oject Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ agricultural land. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, El 13 Yes ❑No strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether 1:1 ❑Yes ❑No man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their ❑ ❑Yes ❑No enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant DY es of scenic views known to be important to the area. ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register El Dyes ❑No of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ project site. Dyes ❑No • Proposed Artion will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: Dyes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 IMPACT ON 1•JSPORTATION �' 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ❑NO ❑YES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? - ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N0 within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 10 IMPACT ON GRO*AND CHARACTER 1 2 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact Be 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Moderate Large Mitigated By ❑ Examples that would apply to column 2 NO DYES Impact Impact Project Change • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5% 11 ❑ []Yes ❑No • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. 13 El ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures 11 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. ❑ []Yes ❑No • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) :'❑ 1:3 Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ [:]Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [I Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude Of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 � PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P x SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman - `� d '�►,-_: '� ',) Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward ? Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald = P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold. New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 OcFabetz all 191 ", James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: 7. Ro ler . Sr. Tax Map No. : 1000-102 - S - 9.3 Street Location: (3r"-V-C ,r,gt— Hamlet Location: C0+C1104 1� Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated . Other (Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Comments 2, UX u 0 Contact Person: o��gUFF01�-�0 G c�r,f' y< PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS `. �? SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 1992 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Lo%t\%c m -Y Ao 7'4r .Sr . SC-TM 1 oro - 101- 's Requested Action: 1, �;"s,e o� 2.3q acre pckrc- l ;^'�o 4 ION, sti loc -Erb, µn le'* SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( x) Unlisted Contact Person: -MeJ k5SA a ( 516)-765-19 8 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (X) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below) . Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, /� Bennett Orlowski, Jr/ 4"S Chairman CC: n.. ...a of Ar. ,i .. DepartmentBen-rd- e-f Trustees Southold Town Board x Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services *NYSDEC - Stony Brook *NYSDEC - Albany u C Army Corp of C N z Y v Sr Dep t 6€ $$0-rcacyvn * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 - Re: William J. Baxter, Jr. SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Gentlemen: - The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: - (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing --- structures are proposed. - - Yours truly, William J. axter, Jr. SO' "OLD 1O\''N P1P.pSNING BOARD 14-16-2 (2;87)-7c • • 617.21 SEAR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Minor Subdivision for William J Baxter Jr. at Griffing Street Cutchogue Name of Action Planning Board for the Town of Southold Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Rer� M L' j p 3 Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if dit tfrom,responsible officer) JfV77 •- 1 f SDuTHDLD Tul'IN Date i p. IN1,iG BCARD 1 4 PARTE —PROJECT INFORMAifN " Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION 'Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter Jr. j LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Griffing Street, Cutchohue, Suffolk Count NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE William Baxter, Jr. (2031 637-4559 ADDRESS 1030 East Putnam Avenue CITY/PO STATE - ZIP CODE !Greenwich CT 106830 NAME OF OWNER tlf different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE same I ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE i DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Minor Subdivision of real property Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) El Forest ❑Agriculture FmOthef vacant 2. Total acreage of project area: 2.78 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 2.78 acres 2.78 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a Soil drainage ❑Well drained 100 % of site CModerately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained % of site See Test Hole Data Sheet dated 8/21/91 b. If any agricultural land is involved. how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? MA acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes Gallo a. What is depth to bedrock? MA (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposedoe�( to with slopes: C0-10% 0 • < 7:10-15% % X15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes zNo 7. Is project substantialh contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Oyes RNo 8, what is the depth of the water table? 27' (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes ONO Do not know. 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? -!Yes ERNO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes RNo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ❑Yes ®No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes 5ENo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes YNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: none a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary NA 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name NA b. Size (In acres) NA 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ❑Yes NNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ❑Yes ❑No NA b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? El Yes ONO NA 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes .xNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? '—Yes GNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes YNO B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 2.78 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0 acres initially; 0 acres ultimately. C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 2.78 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) NOT APPROPRIATE e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed NA %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 proposed 0 g Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 0 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: NA One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length.NA j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 700 ft approximate See attached Plan 3 ' 2. How much natural materiae , rock, i .n, etc.) will be removed frche site? f tons.cubic vards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ❑No ]EN/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? NA b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 01 Yes ❑No NA c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes ❑No NA 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes NNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction NA months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: NA a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ❑No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes RNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction NA after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes LNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ®No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount NA b. Name of wAter body into which effluent will be discharged NA 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ZNo Type NA 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ®No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes ❑No Do not know. 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes NNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month NA tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No NA c. If yes, give name NA ; location NA d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑No NA e. If Yes, explain _ NA 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ®No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? NA tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? NA years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes NNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes NNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes NNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Dyes ®No If yes , indicate type(s) NA 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity NA gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day NA gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes ®No If Yes, explain NA 4 25. Approvals Required: • • Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Boar.! :]Yes 9:No fury, Town, \i x4mPlanning Board Eyes ❑No Subdivision Approval 12/18/91 City, Town Zoning Board Dyes KNo City, County Health Department Eyes ❑No Approval of Realty Subdivision 11/22/91 Other Local Agencies ❑Yes KNo Other Regional Agencies FuYes Z1No Suffolk County Planning Commission State Agencies ❑Yes KNo Federal Agencies ❑Yes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit Esubdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑rescurce management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? HB 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Four tots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? NA 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Depends — See Town Bulk Schedule annexed hereto 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Eyes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/ mile radius of proposed action? Commercial Residential, School, Church 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoiningisurrounding iand uses within a 'A mile? ]yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 24,391 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes KNo 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? =Yes ENo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? _Yes ONo NA 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes 9:No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No NA D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification certify t-tIat the information provided above is true to the bes of my kn w edge Wickham Wickham & Bressler P.�. on be Ralf of A IicantlS ns r NWilliama l a PP ] gax�arY ,1r_ Date Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area,and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. - 5 Pari PRO,-(CT IMPACTS AND THO MAGNI, LIDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing type's of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for'any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No •Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO OYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 0 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable atea of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ []Yes [--]No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes []No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ E-)Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ El Yes []No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ 1 ❑Yes ❑No 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Cl ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ Dyes []No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes []No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO DYES Examples !hat would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ E]Yes []No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ I]Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ❑NO ❑YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NO ❑YES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ModerateLarge gated By ONO OYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ 13 Yes []No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No .noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 1 2 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact Be y 18. Will proposed Impac action affect the character of the existing community? te Large Mitigated By ONO ❑YES m act Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. ❑Yes (--]No • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [-]No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [--]No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ -❑ (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman - +,w "�' +'' '�C Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall. 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald "'� P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold. New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 20 , 1992 Daniel C. Ross Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, P.C. Main Road P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision of William J. Baxter Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-5-9. 3 Dear Mr. Ross: The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 19, 1992 . BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated February 24, 1992, with the following conditions: 1. The location of paving on Griffing Street and School House Lane and any structures (i.e. utility poles, fire hydrants) shall be shown on the final map. 2. An internal parking layout and common curb cuts may be required as a condition of final approval for the proposed lots at the time of site plan review for each lot. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. Five ( 5) paper prints and two ( 2) mylars of the final map, all containing a current stamp of Health Department approval, must be submitted before a final Public hearing will be set. Page 2 William J. Baxter, Jr. Please rote that the Planning Board has referred this subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning 'Commission for their review. You will be notified should covenants and restrictions be required. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, / Bennett Orlowski, Jr. � " ouc Chairman f 04 y�A3 .c 0 . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y Y SCOTT L. HARRIS ao srr Benne[[ Orlowski, Jr., Chairman b, ��� ' � � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. z�O Richard G. Ward _� ,:)fC Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald " P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 nC+o'627— '1992- Suffolk 1992Suffolk County Planning Commision " H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of - _ 1,)',1(', Q y\ 7-. BQ r T Hamlet/Locality O-Lj+c. ,que. S.C.D.P.W. Topo No. : Zoning Hl[% �!-(cvnle+ '13ustnesc� S.C. Tax Map No. : ( p - 101 - 5 - 9.3 Major Sub. Minor Sub. _Site Plan Cluster MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Skec"' \/21291q-2. Pre+ifft!7� Plat ( 3 copies) Road Profiles (1) Drainage Plans (1) _Topogroaphical Map (1) Site Plan (1) _ Grading Plan (1) O er materials /y�spe ecif and give, number of copies) dvt �o�o f1932 Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet CONTINUED REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an (Unlisted (Type I ) (Type II)Action. 2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes) 4. The proposed division has received approval from the S.C. Dept of Health. (Yes) `63 ,a of Qwipw $("'tel re%vtct 4c veri4Kt. Comments: Gr N Tf�2� q qY� Wyk co S We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) (No)) Referral received 19 by Suffolk County Planning Commission and assigned File NO. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman ���S�FFOC,�CO� • �4 Gy PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS C* T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. �( b ( �� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward ati' P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Vc � aloer a10� 199?. Mathew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Martin: Enclosed please find ( 2) surveys �r �C� ��ic . .j. --Rox4a.311. 0� A in C A (..r,aue SC=gng* I000— Please notify this office as to whether any fire wells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. (Z beaieve- -hjCa iS an 4i54in� 4>e.11 on tie Si6e ) Please reply by /1V6,, 3 , 1992. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Be ne t Orlo2 i, Jr.` Chairman enc. Y W' S 2 F PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS v ,�� SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 20, 1992 Daniel C. Ross Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, P.C. Main Road P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision of William J. Baxter Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-5-9. 3 Dear Mr. Ross: The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 19, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated February 24, 1992, with the following conditions: 1. The location of paving on Griffing Street and School House Lane and any structures ( i.e. utility poles, fire hydrants) shall be shown on the final map. 2. An internal parking layout and common curb cuts may be required as a condition of final approval for the proposed lots at the time of site plan review for each lot. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. Five ( 5) paper prints and two ( 2) mylars of the final map, all containing a current stamp of Health Department approval, must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. Page 2 William J. Baxter, Jr. Please rote that the Planning Board has referred this subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for their review. You will be notified should covenants and restrictions be required. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly/yours, v�ll�i Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Chairman :SZNaNNOD :ioarans . :xaaxaS xas„zaq HHAOO SROHZIM NOISSINgnS SW,� LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM MATTIT UC K, LONG ISLAND MORTGAGE OFFICE ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 516-296-5300 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM 516-296-8353 TELEFAX NO.516-296-2012 DANIEL C.ROSS TELEFAX NO. 516-296-6565 LYNNE M.GORDON JOSEPH C.SAVING HUBERT F.SULLIVAN KAREN J.HAGEN October 2, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attention: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Re: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogue, New York SCTM No. 1000/102/5/9.3 Dear Mr. Orlowski: We are proceeding to obtain Health Department approval with respect to the referenced sub-division. The Health Department has requested a SEQRA determination letter from the Town. A copy of the SCHD's Notice of Incomplete Application dated January 29, 1992 is enclosed. If the SEQRA determination has been made, ple se forward a copy and if not, we request a determinati0 made. V ry ur a R Is DCR:vm baxplan79 irM1 - 51,992 1U uV SUFFOLKC TY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVIC* WAS EWATER MANAGEMENT SECTION SUFFOLK COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11901 NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION - SUBDIVISION Your preliminary/final plan submission for the below referenced subdivision or development has been reviewed b this office. This office will re uire the followin for further review: T0: Qpep�KVAA/IuyL �C. DATE:�� �L H.S. REF. : /- j�3 / ZONE N0� TOWN IA/�CNMN _r )Y(7 JA A, �� �D Ce�� ori, Preliminary Submission Cd�h1-e- Signed Applications (enclosed) Paper Prints O Topographic Survey ❑WWM-023 (Application) ❑WWM-024 (EAF) C] F1 Test Holes Located and Witnessed By: O SCDHS inspector. Call 548-3312 for appt. ❑P.E./L.S. as per location instructions. ❑ Other Test Well a Located & sampled by representative of this office. Call 348-2895 for appointment. / (Test well does n t indicate a aiv r of,re it nt for conn ction o publ '� at r) r Other Q� Public water availability and cost letter from local water district. Public water contract or covenant for extension of public water. Public sewer availabilitv letter from local sewer district. Final Submission how on Fin1 Maps: Sewage disposal locations/details for �p@ e t horelocations/details it low a Test well )yo6�tiafn/details ❑Wate— r main locations/details [] Sewer line locations/ etas s , stamped A P E. 's/L.S. 's signature and seal and approved by local sewer district The following is required prior to conti 'on #ryiew: Non-compliance notice enclosed. ■ Board of Review determination letter. VFW ❑Wetlands permit or determination � SEQRA determination letter from ow []Filing fee check of S 60.-per to at time of submission, ?I structions enclosed ✓ .rim , &Lovenants: ,F,pr }I➢_Pr�alCo ✓ „amu or ed CvpY �S —qty 0 Other ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL. PLEASE RETURN A COPY OF THIS FORM WITH ANY RESUBMISSION. ��/ � &vz;4 Reviewer c c: Uv �"yc Lox 10�2�4,,- �II�� � 18-977:4186 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK M5 RK r^yr D vs ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HISSERD, M.D.. M.P.H. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY September 8, 1992 COMMISSIONER Mr. William J. Baxter,Jr. 1030 East Putnam Avenue Greenwich, Connecticut 06830 Dear Mr. Baxter: Subject: Board of Review Hearing- July 2, 1992 Proposed Subdivision of Baxter#91-303,Town of Southold (SCTM 1000-102-5-9.3) Enclosed is a copy of the Board of Review's findings,recommendations and determination concerning the subject application. Based on the information submitted,the Board granted the request for variance with the provisions indicated in the determination. The granting of this waiver does not imply that your application will be automatically approved. It is your responsibility to ensure that your application is complete; otherwise,your approval will be subject to unnecessary delay. Very truly yours, Qwwlw�la Dennis Moran,P.E. Chairman Board of Review DM/Ir Enclosure D A d cc: Mr. Walter G. Lindley Ms. Susan D. Windesheim 4 E Mr. Frank Dowling, Sr. Planner Daniel C. Ross, Esq. SOUTHOLD TORN Town of Southold Planning Board PLANNIW';POAi�D ADMINISTRATION OFFICE ■ 223 RABRO DRIVE EAST. HAUPPAUGE.NY 11788-4290 R TEL (318) 853-3079 FAX (SIB) 853-2927 1 r SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL:QtA'jVFb Article 2,Section 760-220,Sugt k County Sanitary Code a' SEP q PM 3 : 00 To: M E. Hibberd M.D.,M.P.H. 0171"E of THE CIIAFMi t�HE G Comm missioner FHEAL TH From: Dennis Moran,P.E. Chairman,Board of Review Subject: Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: Proposed Subdivision of Baxter#91-303,Town of Southold (SCIM 1000-102-5-9.3) **ssss�a**■s*rs***r*rr**sirs*sr•••t;ssss�•ss►ars�s��a•�s�s Applicant: William J. Baxter,Jr., 1030 East Putnam Avenue, Greenwich, Connecticut 06830 Notice of Hearing: June 4, 1992 - Hearing Date: July 2, 1992 Statement of Problem A community type water system is required when a realty subdivision is located in an area where groundwaters are non-potable or potentially hazardous in accordance with the requirements of Article 6,Section 706-606 (Ld)of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. Findings and Facts 1. Proposed development of a 111,391 sq. ft.parcel into four lots of 24,391 sq.ft. and three at 29,000 sq. ft. 2. Site is in Groundwater Managmement Zone IV. 3. Area is zoned HB-(Hamlet Business). 4. Public water is not available. The site is outside of the Greenport Water Supply franchise area. 5. Depth to groundwater is about 27 ft. 6. Soils are good sand materials 2 ft. below grade. l r Mary E. Hibberd,M.D.,M.P.H. Page Two Subject: Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: Proposed Subdivision of Baxter#91-303,Town of Southold (SCTM 1000-102-5-9.3) 7. Average lot size is 27,848 sq. ft. 8. Test wells indicate water quality exceeds subdivision criteria;nitrates -8.5 mg/1; aldicarb 3.6 ppb- 26 ppb. Applicant is proposing treatment to meet drinking water standards. 9. The record was held open to allow applicant to consider alternate proposal. Response submitted 8/5/92. Determination It was a 3 to 0 determination of the Board to grant the request for the variance provided the applicant covenants,in language acceptable to the County Attorney,that the subdivision will not be used for residential construction and further the allowable sanitary discharge will be limited to Article 6 density requirements. The 24,391 sq. ft.lot will covenant not to exceed 168 gpd of sanitary discharge and the three (3) 29,000 sq. ft.lots shall be covenanted not to exceed 200 gpd each of sanitary discharge. Date Dennis Moran,P.E., Chairman DM/Ir COPY COUNTY OF SUFFOLK g3�� �GC,ES�CcL 1 r�nJ ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HIBSERD, M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER June 4, 1992 Mr. William J. Baxter, Jr. 1030 East Putnam Avenue Greenwich, Connecticut 06830 RE: Proposed Subdivision of Baxter #91-303, (T) Southold (SCTM 1000-102-5-9. 3) Dear Mr. Baxter: Your request to appear before the Board of Review of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services has been received. The review of this case has been scheduled for July 2, 1992, at 10 : 30 a.m. , in the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Conference Room, County Center, Room S-238, Riverhead. You and interested parties are requested to appear, with or without counsel, and you may produce any information or evidence concerning the above referenced property. Should you have any questions, please call Walter G. Lindley at 516-852-2100 . Very truly yours, Dennis Moran, P.E. Chairman Board of Review R 15 , DM: cah D J cc: Mr. James L. Corbin JUN 8 Mr. Robert J. Farmer NQLUfOWN Mr. Walter G. Lindley pANN�NO�� Ms. Susan D. Windesheim " ` Mr. Frank Dowling, Sr. Planner Mr. Daniel C. Ross, Esq. Town of Southold Planning Board DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD. N.Y. 11901-3397 852-2100 I h�1���3�FFOl�C PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS CIO 2-C � SCOTT L. HARRIS S hi Supervisor Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr, 1 b Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward a f�y.- Mark S. McDonald urG- P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 /�qrc� 111 19 92 James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: 10, I1iam T. RcLrl eK Sr Tax Map No. : 1000-_101- 5 - 9.3 Street Location: SAree"t Hamlet Location: c„--61.9a„e Type of Application: X Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated I / al / 9z ) Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Comments: n (Dated + / /1 / ) Conents: T--L” Aft, l- ..t t7L ig nvLnrn ,t ca .i p .„" ? i c an Contact Person: &�issA SOtRO Sib. ms LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND MORTGAGE OFFICE WILLIAM WICKHAM NEW YORK 11952 ERIC J. BRESSLER 516-296-5300 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM 516-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.515-298-2012 DANIEL C. ROSS TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 LYNNE M.GORDON JOSEPH C.SAVINO HUBERT F SULLIVAN KAREN J. HAGEN March 5, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogue, New York SCTM # 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Enclosed herewith, in response to Mr. Richter's January 16, 1992 correspondence, are two copies of a revised proposed Sketch Plan on the referenced Minor Subdivision. V truly, , Daniel C. Ros DCR:hb Encs. .a- 3T $0uiv n�.0 pUd2edt!�t;BGr=. • ��cufFO(K�� � -� rvi5 RAYMOND L. JACOBS X JAMES A. RICHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEERING HIGHWAYS ��Ol ��0INSPECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JANUARY 16, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM # 1000-102-05-9.3 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, I have started a preliminary review of the Plans for the above referenced Minor Subdivision. At this time there seems to be some confusion about the locations of property lines along Griffing Street & School House Road. I have reviewed my files with Mr. Raymond L. Jacobs and have found a letter dated July 9, 1968 which indicates that both of the Roads in question were widened to sixty (60) feet at that -time. I have enclosed a copy of this letter for your reference. I have also found additional documentation that would appear to support the fact that the lot line changes had been recorded at the County Clerks Office. If the lot line change has been properly recorded, the Site Plan should be revised accordingly. The revisions to the survey should also include lines of existing pavement as well as indicating all utilities in the road that are adjacent to the proposed subdivision. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact my office. i erely, ;� ul � ✓ James A. RicENC.cc: Mr. Raymond L. Jacobsfile LAW OFFICES WILLIAM WICKHAM MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND NEW YORK 11952 516 MA 9-8353 July 9, 1968 Hon, Teeter M. Albertson, Supervisor Town of Southold Front Street Greenport, Now York Dear pets All deeds and releases have now been executed to con- vey to the Town of Southold the additional ten feet to Griffing Street, School House Road and North'Street at Cutahogus so that the some will -row be sixty feet in vidtb a. Griffing Street from the Post Office northward to School House Head, School Souse Road from the westGrly extressity east to Horth Street and North Street from the northerly extremity southerly to the Case erty. The instruments have been .forve►tded %Q .the Couaty Clerk's .Office far re— cording abil' whesi xeturned thoy will be torwarded to you, Unfortunately*.hZ ao 6t .have extra Copies of the survey map but they maybe `eaaly obtained from the Van Tuyl office. ' Very cordially yours, WILLIAM WICKHAsl Im'Wsbts William Wickham CCs Robert Tanker, Esq. 34eerintendsnt & Highways Fat o� 06 r�S RAYMOND L. JACOBS Ln T JAMES A. RICHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF Q ENGINEERING HIGHWAYS ��rol ��O!' INSPECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JANUARY 16, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogue SCTM # 1000-102-05-9.3 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, I have started a preliminary review of the Plans for the above referenced Minor Subdivision. At this time there seems to be some confusion about the locations of property lines along Griffing Street & School House Road. I have reviewed my files with Mr. Raymond L. Jacobs and have found a letter dated July 9, 1968 which indicates that both of the Roads in question were widened to sixty (60) feet at that time. I have enclosed a copy of this letter for your reference. I have also found additional documentation that would appear to support the fact that the lot line changes had been recorded at the County Clerks Office. If the lot line change has been properly recorded, the Site Plan should be revised accordingly. The revisions to the survey should also include lines of existing pavement as well as indicating all utilities in the road that are adjacent to the proposed subdivision. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact my office. i erely, James A. Richter, U -— ENC.� cc: Mr. Raymond L. Jacobs fy ( 6 file �•f� SOUTNDLO WN �o LAW OFFICES WILLIAM WICKHAM MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND NEW YORK 11952 516 MA 9-8353 July 91 1963 Hon. pester M. Albertson* Supervisor Town of Southold Front Street Greenport, New York Dear Let: All deeds and releases have now been executed to con— vey to the Torn of Southold the additional ten feet to Griffing Street, School House Road and North Street at Cutchogue so that the sane will now be sixty feet in widtb. Griffing Street from the Post Office northward. to School House Road, School House Road from tho westerly extremity east to North Street and North Street from the northerly extrema t'f southerly .to the Case property The instr=ants have been .forwarded to the County Clerk's Office for re— cording slid when returned they will be forwarded to you. Unfortunately,-'m do. aot .have extra copies of the survey nap but they may, 'be easily obtained from the Van Tuyl office. ' very cordially yours, WILLIAM WICKHAm lr'Wsbts viilliam Wickham CC: Robert Tasker, 5aq. Raymond C. Aeon Supersnterdent bf Highways LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND MORTGAGE OFFICE WILLIAM WICKHAM NEW YORK 11952 ERIC J.BRESSLER 516-298-5300 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM 516-296-8353 TELEFAX NO.516-298-2012 DANIEL C.R055 TELEFAX NO. 516-298-6565 LYNNE M.GORDON JOSEPH C.5AVINO HUBERT F.SULLIVAN KAREN J.HAGEN January 21, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Att: Ms. Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogue, New York SCTM # 1000-102-5-9 . 3 Dear Ms. Spiro: Enclosed is a full Environmental Assessment Form submitted with respect to the referenced application. rytruly s, Da el C. Ross DCR:hb Enc. 30-baxtplbd Frimmw 0INR 221992'HOLD TOWN NING BOARD 14-16-2 (2187)-7c 617.21 � SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter Jr. at Griffing Street, Cutchogue Name of Action Planning Board for the Town of Southold Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Res D LS li Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If di t frO2P1L K qp js"2ffi gr , Date SOUTHOLD TOWN PINING 80ARD 1 PAR*PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter Jr LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Griffing Street, Cutchohue, Suffolk Count BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR (203 637-4559 William Baxter, Jr. ADDRESS 1030 East Putnam Avenue STATE 21P CODE CITYIPO CT 06830 Greenwich BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER(if different) same ADDRESS STATE ZIP CODE CITY/PO DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Minor Subdivision of real property i Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting Of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: 'Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ;]Forest ❑Agriculture ®Other vacanl 2. Total acreage of project area: 2.78 acres. PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION APPROXIMATE ACREAGE 2.78 acres 2.78 acres Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres acres acres Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage 'Well drained 100 % of site 'Moderately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained % of site See Test Hole Data Sheet dated 8/21/91 b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? NA acres (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4 Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes 5dNo a. What is depth to bedrock? NA (in feet) 2 > 5. Approximate percentage of proposed projelfe with slopes: ❑0-10% 0 ❑10-15% % Ell 5% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? —'Yes XNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? El Yes ®No 8- What is the depth of the water table? 27' (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes -No Do not know. 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? -.Yes L3No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes ®No According to Identify each species - 12. Are there any unique or unusual land torms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Eyes [gNo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes XNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? -]Yes 3ENo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: none a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary NA 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name NA b. Size (In acres) NA 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? []Yes NNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? []Yes ❑No NA b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Dyes []NO NA 18 Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes adNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Eyes XNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes 2No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (till in dimensions as appropriate) a Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 2.78 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0 acres initially; 0 acres ultimately. c Project acreage to remain undeveloped 2.78 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) NOT APPROPRIATE e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed NA %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 proposed 0 g, Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 0 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: NA One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length.NA j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 700 ftapproximate See attached Plan 3 2 How much natural material (i.e , rock, 0, etc.) will be removed from the site? — tonsicubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ❑No ®NIA a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? NA b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑No NA c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ONO NA 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? []Yes 9PNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction NA months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: NA a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes [-]No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ®No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction NA after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes ®No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ®No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount NA b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged NA 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes K]No Type NA 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ®No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes ONO Do not know. 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes ENO a. If yes, what is the amount per month NA tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ONO NA c. If yes, give name NA ; location NA d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑No NA e. If Yes, explain NA 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ®No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? NA tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? NA years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes %No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes ENO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? []Yes ®No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑Yes ONO If yes , indicate type(s) NA 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity NA gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day NA gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or federal funding? ❑Yes ®No If Yes, explain NA 4 2S. Approvals Required: . . Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village '—Yes KNo f-dV, Town, Vaidag%Planning Board flYes ❑No Subdivision Approval 12/18/91 City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ®No City, County Health Department Eyes 0 N Approval of Realty Subdivision 11/22/91 Other Local Agencies ❑Yes 9]No Other Regional Agencies oYes ::!No Suffolk County Planning Commission State Agencies []Yes ®No Federal Agencies ❑Yes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ?'Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance []special use permit subdivision ❑site plan ❑newlrevision of master plan ❑rescurce management plan ❑other 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? HB 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? four lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? NA 5 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Depends — See Town Bulk Schedule annexed hereto 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Eyes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/, mile radius of proposed action? Commercial Residential, School, Church 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoin inglsurrounding iand uses within a Y. mile? Eyes ❑No 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 24,391 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ®No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? --Yes FNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? _Yes ❑No NA 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Eyes KNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No NA D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify t at the information provided above is true to the best of my knpwledge. Applicantl5 ns r N Wickha Wickham & Bressler P.C. on bbelllgalfr of Date AA a� Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part }2—PROOT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGADE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? LINO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO ❑YES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ [--]Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ F-1 Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? LINO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 7 • 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes []No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ El Yes []No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ❑NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • El I] El Yes ❑No Other impacts: 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ Dyes []No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres El 11 ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes 1:1 No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ❑NO ❑YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12, Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ E3 Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13, Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NO ❑YES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ E]Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 9 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ONO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ F-1 Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ El Yes []No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ []Yes []No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑NO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [-]Yes ❑No 10 �-s- IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 2 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact Be y 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ EJ Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 = f Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTSt Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2 Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS _ Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman G r;, SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 'y �� '�" _�i'„ Supervisor Richard G. Ward -.!� �.o �. Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 3anuarY 9, 1992 Raymond Jacobs Superintendent of Highways Peconic, New York 11958 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchogue Zoning District: Hamlet Business SCTM# 1000-102-5-9. 3 Dear Mr. Jacobs, The Planning Board is in receipt of a 4 lot minor subdivision application for the above mentioned parcel. A copy Of the map is enclosed for your review. Your assistance is requested in determining what improvements (sidewalks, curbing, drainage, re-surfacing of Griffing Street, etc. ) should be required prior to the granting of any subdivision approval. Individual site plans for each lot have not been submitted. However, the Board is considering restricting the number of curb cuts and requiring an interconnected internal parking design as part of the subdivision review. The Board awaits your comments before proceeding with their review. Please contact Melissa Spiro if you require any additional information or have any questions regarding the above. Veerr//yM truly �///yours, u Bennett Orlowski, JrJ S Chairman cc: James Richter SuBFI c,E ouatz LAW OFFICES I iC WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. LJ MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM MATTITUC K, LONG ISLAND MORTGAGE OFFICE ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 516-298-5300 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM 516-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.516-298-2012 DANIEL C. 8055 TELEFAX NO. 516-298-8565 LYNNE M.GORDON JOSEPH C.SAVINO HUBERT F.SULLIVAN KAREN J. HAGEN December 18, 1991 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Att: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Re: Minor Subdivision for William J. Baxter, Jr. Griffing Street, Cutchouge, New York SCTM # 1000-102-5-9.3 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Enclosed please find the following with respect to the referenced application: 1. Application for Approval of Plat, in duplicate; 2. Grading/Road letter; 3. Southold Town Short Environmental Assessment Form; 4. SEQRA Short Environmental Assessment form; 5. One copy of Sketch Plan of Minor Subdivision; 6. Description of Real Property; 7. William J. Baxter's check number 630, dated 12/6/91, in the amount of $3,000.00 to the order of Southold Town Clerk. paniel ouC. Ross DCR:hb Encs. O �( 230 .Icf NN`NGgopR 4 ?� • APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be W.I.WAR.J..Aute-A...J1'.. ......................... ............................................................?-...:3.."6 3..... `.,S.....y 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as - follows: Liber 5.199................... Page .M.6............. ... On .A4.5!6.3.............. : Liber ........................ Page ................. ..... On . Liber ........................ Page ...................... On . ...................... ; Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... .. Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ...................... as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ....................................... or as distributee ........................................................................ ................................................. ................ .... .......................... . S. The area of the land is .4,7A............ acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid. wwgt ....... ..... ... ............ .................................. .... .... .. .. ...... .... .... .................... 7. The land is encumbered by 19 ........... ...... ...... .. .. ...... .................... ..... mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber ..... ... ...... Pace . .. .. ...... . ...... in original amount of $. .... ......... unpaid amount $ ..... . .. .. . . .... .. .. . hell by .... ......... C� .............. address ...................... ...... .... �.Q ... 'i � r....... (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Pace . .... . e .. �. `j�bri 'ltsl mount of ....... ....... unpaid amount $...... . .. ...... .. . I .... ujNo`GBOAP ....... .............. address ................. ,,... Ns11 ............. (e) Mortgage recorded in Liber Page . . . .. . ..... .. ... in original amount of . .. .......... . unpaid amount$. .. ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . held by ... ...... ........ ..... ......... ............. address ... . . .... .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. .................. .... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ........................ ......................................... . . .... ........................................ 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts Hamlet, Business,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ................... ................ ........ .... .. .. .. .................................. . 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise,mc ®pt .................................... .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .............................. . 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is ....................... .......... ............................. 13. Water mains will be laid by ................... ...... .................................. . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ......................................... ........ and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by ............ .... .. ....... . ........................... ........ and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold IIighway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. Griffing Street is maintained by the town of Southold. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Wherc the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proccedim;s, the nppliawt will (-Her proof of title as required by See. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed decd for lots shovringy all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $•...... ... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at ....... .. .. . . . years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE ....� .............. �..� ..., 1991.. .William,); x , Bater1.jr...................... . . (Namo�plic nt) By .... .. ......... ...... (Signature and itle) c/q,P;O.,,Box, 1424 Main Road,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (Address) Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF .$Pf f q1 k...................... .. ss: On the ., 18th day of. ....... December,,,,,,,,,,,, 1991..., before me personally came Vjj.jiapi J t, .... ............... to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ....ate..... executed the same. 7�t is ! ........... Notary Public HELEN G SERDINKA Notary Public.51a.a-1 New Volk No 652HS,!O . Qualified in Suu,la County pO STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ........ . ...............CO"mpn Expires August 31.191�'Z On the . ...... .. ....... day . .. .. .. ..... of .... ... ...... .. 19. .. ..., before me personally came tome known, who being by me duly sworn did de- poseand say that ....... .. .. . resides at No. . .. .. .. .. .... .. ...... ...... .. ...................... . that . .. .. .. . . .. ... . .. .. .. .... . is the ... ....... ... .... ........ .. . of . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .... ........ .. ...... .. . . .... . . .. .. ...... .. . ............... . the corporation described in and which executed the ioregoutg instrument; that . .. .. .. ..... knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. :..I.I Ill:it signed . .. .... ....... name thereto by lilac order. . . . .. . . . . . . .... . . .. .. .. .... .................. Notary Public Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 - Re: William J. Baxter, Jr. SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: - (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing -- structures are proposed. --- -- - Yours truly, A William J. axter, Jr. � 2 31991 VS S001"ING BOR AD IVA CF SOUMCLD sHCM aMMM PAL ASSES90C FCR! II0.S`PIdlL`fICNS: (a) In order to answer the questions in this short FAF it is assured that the preparer will use currently available information concerning the project and the likely impacts of the action. It is not effected that additional studies, research or other investigations will be undertaken. be significant and a (b) If any question has been answered Yest the project may completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessary. (c) If all questions have been answered No, it is likely that this project is not significant. (d) Environmental Assessment: 1. will project result in a large physical change to the project site or physically alter more than to acres of land? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No 2. Will there be a major change to any unique or unusual lard form found on the site? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No 3. will project alter or have a large effect on an existing body of water? . . . No 4. Will project have a potentially large impact on groundwater quality? . . . . . No 5. Will project significantly effect drainage--flaw en adaoent sites? No 6. Will project affect any threatened or endangered plants or animal. species? No 7. Will project result in a major adverse effect on air quality? . . . . . . . . No S. will project have a major effect on visual character of the community or scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? . . . . . . . . No 9. will project adversely impact any site on structure of historic, pre- historic, or paleontological importance at any site designated as a critical environmental area by a local agency? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No 30. will project have a major effect an existing or future recreational opportunities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No 11. will project result in major traffic problems or cause a major affect to - adsting transportation systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ND 12. will project regularly cause objectionable odors. noise# glare, vibration, or electrical disturbanoe as a result of the project's operation? . . . . . . No 13. will project have any impact an public health or safety? . . . . . . . . . . . No 14. will project affect the existing eommmity by directly causing a growth in pehmnanern population of more than 5 percent over a one-year period or have a major negative effect an the character of the 000 wdty cc neighborhood? . . No 15. Is there public eontrw rsy concerning the project? . . . . . . . . . . No vo�nrwr_: DAMS -v 1416J rorev Cg % - I 11PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 1' ARK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I Project information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) OR 2 3 1991 U 1. Applicant/sponsor 2. Project NameWilliam J. Baxter. Jr. Min �` ]'�"-'Aaxte> .T,- 3. Project location: - Municipality Cutcho ue Town of Southold County Suffolk a. Is proposed action: ® New ❑ Expansion ❑ Modification/alteration 5. Describe project briefly. Minor Subdivision of 2.78 acres into four lots, three containing 29,000 square feet each and One containing 24,391 square feet. 6. Precise location(road interseclwns, prominent landmarks,etc or provide map) Southeast corner of Griffing Street and School House Road, Cutchogue, N.Y. 7. Amount of land affected: Initially —L.21— acres Ultimately ---2-.98acres e. Will proposed action comply with existing coning w other existing lard use msuictioro? ® Yes ❑ No If No,describe briefly 9. What is present land on in vicinity of project? ® Residential ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Agriculture ❑ Parklarsdlopen space ❑ Other Describe: Zoning of property is Hamlet business and to the north of the property is Hamlet Residential. 10. Does action involve a permitrapproval,or funding.now or ultimately.from any other governmental agency(FederaL state or loall? ® Yes ❑ No If yes,list agency(s)and permWapprovals Suffolk County Department of Health Services — Realty Subdivision. 11. Does any aspect of the action have a currently valid permit or approval? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, list agency name and permit/approval type 12. As result of proposed action will existing permitlapproval require modification? ❑ Yes ® No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE q APPlicanUsponsor name: William J Date: Signature: It the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER DESCRIPTION OF WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. SUBDIVISION BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Griffing Street at the southwest corner of the premises herein described and the northwest corner of land of Terp, said point of beginning; RUNNING THENCE along the easterly line of Griffing Street the following courses and distances: 1) North 49° 34' 40" West 17. 12 feet; 2) North 380 05' 40" West 554.91 feet to a point; THENCE in a curve to the right with an arc of 39.01 feet a distance of 24.56 feet to the southerly line of School House Road; RUNNING THENCE along said line North 520 55' 20" East 144.10 feet to land now or formerly of Gemma the following two courses and distances: 1) South 40° 10' 00" East 497.31 feet; 2) North 52° 53' 50" East 57.53 feet to land of Case; RUNNING THENCE along said land of Case South 370 50' 10" East 100 feet to land of Terp; RUNNING THENCE along said land South 52° 55' 40" West 240.74 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. L-------- - - __ SKETCH PLAN OF NORTH STREET' MINOR 5UBDI V! SION � ----.------__- __ _. �---- OF PROPERTY SUP-VEYED FOR { o W( LL , AM J. BAXTEf2, J2. CASE AT N/F GEMMA CUTCHOGUE 60'-i - TOWN OP SOUTNOLA NY. in 5Fcn37f 5p 10 E. ----- ' -- ! Lr) — w a 100.0 in 3 5.� 1520E. 492.43 Z + TEa9 \ a \ - — - - - ----- -1— - - S 165 165 ! 160uj uCZr j C 27000 S.C. ,n`#\ , 27, S.F. 271GW SF ✓ '3 i � `moi" / 22,000 SIC 1 iai •01 -rFST Hole Sfil. N _ r 160--- � 100—� _ _, Z N 38 20 W. 54 403.99 GRIl=F1NG STT2>reET ;VAR WIDTH) IV SCALE- 100'• 1 9 AREA• 2.3 AC, T 17 ::!4' .. vS TEST HOLE C - ^f ['. LOAM 1 i 4 �Y L. • v v.. yyyY n < 10 DEPS�7 . LOAMY, ^ LANE k F�aRw;Na Wffl [, SILTY ':axr r =Y c A : NOTES: F1A.E �I , � +'arra ca,c 4or I. SUFFOLK a'1.TiV( M�.P DE'SLt3NMON ; FINE ro , —_.. o15r. 1000-SgG7". 1> g C6hi29f o...._.. .a 1 2 PwPER7Y is 114 Z" tNES5) SAND Z 3• ANTIQuRS QEEE2 TO MEAN SQA LEVEL A5 Sua `t p AND 2.MSED 14AZ-1*J994 fZODEQICk VAN TUYL P.C. Gvmwl. ST. r / f `\ ;,lc,w14v smve,roas - GrieeNvoaT NY. H 12�22I�� W y OPFtLt; Of T06 SmnNOLD N/0/F NORTH STREET REALTY 14 492.4 S 40'15'20" E Wtoo, 162.43'• Z'' 183.00' 185.00' N `: n NE14 CulkihiW1 AND tMw n e PAYEMENT '17111'5 AREA lea IJac RtG1UtRtO AS PtR PAI 'Arrp, !�! . ♦ NEW SIOEWALL WILL. 6E a� ^ , REQU(Ato 6Y 4NE. PLAt4x(NC2 ..• �opRD AT1'NE TIME OF St'IF PLAN RE.V1tr1A1. o 3LOT I LOT 01 LOT Q 3Q o W I � O ♦ p Y N U) y I�EW CbNGRL�G CUR2�I1J?� TEST HOLE 1jEld SIL3LWAL1, WILL BE _ NtiW Cc1R�Wca AtyO SAW CLYr EX(9'rlrl(aR�Qulr3fn BY PLANNnIU O � W NE.IAI PAVP.M ENT 114IS ••+ ASPNAL4' AS RE.Qu(RED $PARD AT 'rcMe. OF 511E tel• / $ t9RE•A Is Not Rt✓q V1REn 9LAt4 Rf VIEW ro INSTALL ORAINA(a6 41 w_ �j0 Zpl I hlo CUP101UCs AS PER 8 AS PEA RAY JACZE'S p --a --- ------ �' RAY s1AGo95 G Imo, yb f �quY Xo.D 142.34• 185.00' 180.00' VIEW I{EADWAIL aQ 83'• N 39-38-29- W N JW�10 w as PER SURVEY of Y rl PG ENO PWiNIc SURVEYORS DATED 7/1/97, y,;v RIP pS�a[,?IoN P RIPp RAP. ° , , • ° i ° ♦ • Z}..1' ♦ ° ♦ 1'.5"1 25.9. d -EDGE OF PAVEIl7d 'O �AVEIO PE • a 7 Yl a .. . .N w y - EDGE OF PAVEMENT ` GRIFFING STREET RREAS NIGNU�H1>rD IK stED CRASS SPOULOE.R '(E RE,MAIIJ WILL RE.QuIRf. Nf.til PAVEMUf. uTot(,K -Y40'yro1JF. Mswo OR RCA EAS(s, Z'/,' A5PAAL? &tADbR I��Z° ()SPNQLf WEARI4Ca SURFACE ti �' I h Q S. 40^�s / �'�, SO ?'T • 'fir---_.....:: ..,..r..,3i. ; So3.%f:o.r 4 1�414 ft' ;D M °` U i� Q . ,y O Nr bF :PROPOSE£a Lt//DN1NG y� if L/cens dl.u.rd` rrc✓a-s }^451sc-`' ! r.-ra j`,� ,QND, • . . mix..ro rf /v.Y. , � 76W/•� oF.S©117 NaLO Ex>�tiny+ 7.,�cs x ' -- --- > .; k , 51M�w Yore r[- K SGol; - - - _ . a x j'a�` k: IM 'CEl} f' `� '- s """'°` r�Y+•�` ri a`-t. a ..cs�u", _r + _ _ r� ' __ - f _ a � N 2. 'q �N Q - - -. " � �VI' � �i�{j� �9� '� r �_Y �'yc ry ` � •k � � - 1(nn D ` �Ie� "1 � r k • m c3 A .)( '- e� �. _-. _���7 jj-1�'!�=d0 �e•\\l.. . -- -- _. . _ _ .S, 3 9 ro ro"�- • 674 69 ._. _ .__ 29 Two - ' y � ---- S 3A o� qr. � . '°` X98 •a9'�r•, � � 3Z >`OY': . _- D6 l"7 6A0.9/ OD'00•'W. 359.9% ` NOV 81996 ,t� Cl •LASER FICHE FORM • SUBDIVISIONS Proiect Type: Minor Status: Expired j SCTM # : 1000 - 102.-5-9.3 Proiect Name: Baxter at Griffing Street Location: This property is located at the N/E side Griffing Street and the s/e side of School House Road, Cutchogue, NY Hamlet: Cutchogue Applicant Name: William Baxter Jr. Owner Name: William Baxter Jr. Zone 1 : HB. Approval Date: No j ATTtiawgT) PLAT Signed Date: OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information Zone 2: Zone 3: Cand R's : Homeowners Association : R and M Agreement: Address: County Filing Date: SCANNL D Records \-facrrcment SCAN Date: KED' MAP NOIYI'll AINI;T"ILOCATION MAP TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM SCALE 1 "=600' aY� NBT TO SCALE) " ° i TYPICAL PLOT PLAN ��� MINOR SUBDIVISION SCALE 1 "= 100' EE mniromm"m'ioEv° es no "mrt° mu°A iRttsunc nmr uRA 4'e• 1 : (NOT TO SCALE) � 7' xx,ma H. howei, arp ! PREPARED FOR in 41 eff Pnl}IEp I/e•/I• 3r RFR rrnRr PROPERTY UN WILLIAM J . BAXTER JR . f ! � .aDE �nY - g DEPOT LANE Ly v�L WELL SITUATED AT MN WY SP TWNAN CUTCHOGUE SEPTIC TAN$ ITN" ' wwu ._cou, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD xRAU-E !WLIYYFAwA MHUUM OFEffi'hIII' NaP],°0a PM AT v N.KNORrH SIREEr j ^' i' ' /. ] AIL W LS. M eE A xwuux N Y.A T ]TlHO M rc e•ua A plvY mOF" or.•.I ' u<w�. .Y,�,aD.�� �Nq,�N°,o � � EaP W � •- SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK ..w1+gals sNa1 sE Sr9m m MR tHE LWN wtumm.DIE,711CWlui'm�RE.�PAIT LaM.ED lI aim iFA°�Q°0a NS WIN A wx I°Imurc OF 31/49rr,Y,ml,oe, f• V °6IHICE.E1wEFFl11 EEPna THIN NIO ,K,IIY 941.eE YNXfANm ; gWNa WAIAI � 2 SCALE 1 "=40' ] oewOY"i,ana ..ORIFFING srREET .. SEPTEMBER 15, 1 98 T 9 aa ,_, W, ,,,,,.-_ _, I wYry'�n•,•,•_ LEacHING POOL BUILDING MARCH 25, 1999 REVISED AS PER TOWN ENGINEER l�z�.., W N 1 Pmt: IT WEEP. r A., AREA DATA IEIfarM Pori NE 111 °a�1C1mxw o°ItF PROudo Rues. olxrwWm m1ruE W.McoNNo muW 4 N •C __:. ._ moi , n i •••--„`•' '_ .i. S N. CarEAS DF P... coacei E (m mWi). L _ TOTAL AREA = 104,091 .58 sq ft. �'I 27,168.56 sq. ft. a AN'i' M� OhicuaAu.n lira MMM aA RE won"... 2.390 uuxr wen. z o 2.390 aC. LOT 1 0.624 aa. a. w a' mn. ds E Y w II w ECNw wp s N° ssv c* N 9w eE wsrtu m SEPTIC TANK LOT 2 27.393.12 sq. ft. THIS SUBDIVISION WILL APPEAR IN m LEACHING 0.629 GC. DISTRICT 1000 SECTION 102 BLOCK 05 POOL c W LOT 3 , 27,048.43 sq. ft. z 0.621 ac. { THE EXISTANCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS ROAD LOT 4 22,441 .11 CO. ff. ANDANY, NOT SHOOR WN TAREFNOTRECORD, RANTEED. NORTH STREET 0.5,5 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY US FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED TOTAL 10 2.38922 sq. ft. OCTOBER S HOW AND THAT ALL CONCRETE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT N.Y.HEALTH SERVICES 2.389 ac. MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS: ■ HEREON HAUIRAUCE, . ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSRIONS ARE CORAND GEODETIC SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL MAR o AND GEODERC DETAILS ARE CORRECT. R 2 5 10 Date BUILDING ZONE DISTRICT: HB (HAMLET/BUSINESS)' BY FIRE DISTRICT::' , UTCHOGUE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THE SUBDIVISION PIAN HAS BEEN APPROVED ' - - C' - BY THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BY RESOLUTION �I F. 'j !, I I I' i OF APPROVAL DATED This le to Codify that Ne Whihn or Oenlopment t • LSaX'�yf I.lr In the Se�u14• - with C total of 4 lot was _ n appraysd on the bove dab. Water 5upplio nd Se age Disposal Fr ^ - Facill...we .. .anfarm W mnetrvcfian sWndoNPDI. effect at Ne Dms LB O 2bUlf "- f construction and an sublsd to se orals permib pursuant to those standaNs. Thle appnwl sFhall be valid only If the Wady u4dWlewn/ CHAIRMAN PLANNING BOARD dswlapment map le duly filed rile the County Clerk within ons year C of Nb date. Canes. Ie hereby given for the filing of this Tap on 341 LIJ�I GI I(i'PJ1N which this endorsement appears in Ne Offiae of tb County Clerk in ardance WIN the vlelons of the Public Health Law and the oca p F VL�TO i"Hfl E�3iW Suffolk County Sanbary Cads. NOTES I N/0/F 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS: `ARE REFERENCED TO AN ASSUMED DATUM, STANLEY G. CASE "y 2. IF SILTY SAND IS FOUND IN THE EXCAVATION FOR THE SANITARY & HELEN B. CASE 'y IT MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CLEAN SAND. �'ra A Mwli eo (S37r5o'10" E to .cl',• FOUN° 3. S.C.D.H.S. REFERENCE No. SIO-96-006 � g e�' Wrlc. um, whaselsh-Pe"show dncar• DIWslan of Environs I Duality AATREENORTH STREET REALTY InTVOWNER AND APPLICANT: EcrT°cau�°uwr6a492.43' ii WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. � S 41715'20" E 1e5.00• 185.00, 182.43' mu� 1030 E.PUTNAM AVE. �g GREENWICH, CT. 06836 n � aR01wQ1L���� . ` . � y F BUBJECTTO CONVFJUlf1b. FOUND WC. MON rO .• �� j \� � �pKmioatlBn z o g TEST HOLE DATA 0O w$ TEST HOLE DUG BY McOONUO GEOSCIENC 211 LOT c Q LOT Q LOT (a) / D' P ^ Q LOT.Rd O / i ssmY Ioul '.fir DIC 3�q a %. yE,O LAN S CURB F ° n nL �JI,.,TTESD HOLE in .YNI F11I Y N j 09 C t /.- ,W GR IX6llxp AmWLT AS 2 y, W W 117 '.A o Q flEWIE TO IILSrN1 DR4WDE p N 3 4 • • '4 9 NEW HFAaYUll aR On 4 PIPE END DOMINION HTH RIP HW Ja• P PE ' •s Y '{p' n . . . PROPOSE a x4 x w '• x'V W i ~ W 403.98' AS PER SURVEY By 0. G H'BASIN •' x x m& RODERICN VAN TY2. DATED 10/18/Be NEW N.Y.S. OC. No. 49688 too' f • - _ maT1 6N 94s"m'm a sxo°I.xousE Itwo 142.u' us.9o' te0.aa' 88.88' lI� �Ic°uW 402.36' . ••. AL =23.91 ••- .• '"' - "ac r v vw4C !.A �nll� PALE N eT F. L=3E.fi3'• Nv393E'20" W N CONIC 10• W As PER TE) 7/ 9 ""t�yy PRCwDem ace, saxim N pROPpem CONE cMB PECONC SURJEYORS DATE) J/I,,/9JNA'a� - -V rA�"3` A9 IEDNRED BY PUMPING mWp' 5G7.22' m CFY6E sW0 . EWTDRR °�R E GRASS AICN➢FA T) RFYNN "A AT SITE PUH gENEW ADLrr A NIEM'°HA 7 RODERICKSVAN P'�ILRv�y a , 7� DATED 10/18/98 —;2L3' •YS.d . 253 I 0XEOFIMMEMEHr '• • ' .s ed , • s • Joseph A. In a no 9 . . . Land Surveyor NEW PAVFMEHf la eE Amm ' • • • • ` •A Ep£ D.PAYEMWr�1. • • • • • .. . . i 4• N3,4 =m2E1 H�:� °� E"° m " GRIFFING STREET e v I-1/R•ASW WT BEAR. ."AcE MIIIY UL 4/ ggpFM W1R6 — , 1 n Title Surveys — Subdivisions — Site Plans — Construction Layout � PME PHONE (516)727-2090 Fax (516)722-5093 OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS One Union Square P.O. Box 1931 Aquebogue, New York 11931 Riverhead, New York 11901 I 9A—.510-1 li o KE Y MAP (A P NORTH STREET L'l' 1YIEl, LOCATION MAP TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TYPICAL PLOT PLAN SCALE 1 =600' Nal, Da m su4E) SCALE 1 "= 100' rIq.� n'� , �,a a,�,,,, 1�1 awl, (Nor ro SCALE) PROPERIYLINE MINOR SUBDIVISION _ PREPARED FOR x/M I'I Flow w W WELL WILLIAM J . BAXTER JR . W11E Mlpl 1 DEPOT IANE xo�nm.,R k ' SITUATED AT T, - `�� _ s - CUTCHOGUE 6es �0ar y x aawwe sru Nm^""" aEBwIx WaAW rAT..awa. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TY.N®BWLE A 1WMYff ./,IW1Me0131 W. AFnW TrJOFlSff 4•. 'b'. .pnou wA 1W RWL AplFaklr Te Emyr IN rwAm m.cl,W aW sore r.] ( 'Z 1.ML.qMi SWl E EMID E 11NT TE 1Wr 61Nawll.n. wK 1 NORO1 STREET wF EwIF TNN wWL E NSE1de E w w.aaspe porde A wE lafAWCE W A,/•, — SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW Y O R K g o - ,.entre ones ,AN 4 fe N W A WIIE r red, m W 0.MIC1 eVn m m elle. ,.sere 4i E i y e A Itl ,nh OeINA£EIEDI wPIL➢�Nl/M IYE aWL E W1nfMiD. tl ww €9 W yy$ Q If ' I+ U .�..:�.ILw.� «fin' �'^" BUILOINC SCALE 1 "=40' ?SI.IYt'iir'.. p' �. 98 _ .arc' d ) I ... ,-• -- -- LEACHING�xvnrrep, — SEPTEMBER 15, R TO — 41>� ---'=-- � — POOL MARCH ENGINEER cEmNc slnEEr ..._..Ik;�.�,m,� ` ` .w,•'- — 1.2 CTOB ER OS20 REV SED MA' �� �GRIT ING S�"�2 � _- j __.�_ �_ x — . p�anpla aw, T^" 0 TOTAL AREA 0— 104 091 .58 sq ft. '� �1�1ryryryry///w���""" 4.A 10' mhDS fY mlh pNTM1E E,EH n1 Iw.la FWI! D )/ 2.39D 4c. ,wxn S11K T.wl swL E RNIrA'AEp. tFACHINC 1 POOL ROAa SOV z// I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE I hereby certify that the water supply(s) and/or sewage disposal systems) for this project BY US FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED were designed by me or under my direction. Based upon a careful n d thorough study of SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES OCTOBER 15, 1998 AND THAT ALL CONCRETE the soil, site and groundwater conditions, all lots, qs proposed, conform to the Suffolk County HAIJPPAUGE, N.Y. Southold Town MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS:■ HEREON Department of Health Services construction standards in effect as of ,this date. THIS SUBDIVISION WILL APPEAR IN ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS ARE DISTRICT 1000 SECTION 102 BLOCK 05 rianning Board CORRECTLY SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS ARE CORRECT. NORTH STREET Dale THE EXISTANCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. IF BY ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THE SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BY RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL DATED Thio iff to cent, that the pnpewi Really SubdMision or O.v.loprnent for in the with a total of lot now approved on the above date. Water Supplies and Sewage Disposal FadllHles most codarnI to conshxAlon sW dan. in effect at the time of mnetmcRan and are ..bj.d W .."nets WrmRe Pulwont to Now development map approval lyPo.a Bb the �Couunty Clark awithinu an. y/ CHAIRMAN PLANNING BOARD of lhle date. Consent 10 hereby given for the filing of MI. map an which IN. endareemmtapp re In the Office of the County Clerk in accordance whh the pravielons of the public Health Law and the NOTES. Suffolk Cordy Sanitary Code. "9 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS: i+ ARE REFERENCED TO AN ASSUMED DATUM. 2. IF SILTY SAND IS FOUND IN THE EXCAVATION FOR THE SANITARY R IT MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CLEAN SAND. 3. S.C.D.H.S. REFERENCE No. SIO-96-006 Vito A Minei, P.E. N/O/F I Director, DWIhion of Environmadol ouollty AREA DATA STANLEY G. CASE d.' HELEN H CASE 10" S 3T50'10' E o, Fouls LOT 1 27,168.56 sq. fie '10 .00' coxa . 0.624 C. �n ,;y 27,393.12 s ft. LOT 2 0.629 ac. HW� � yy W \I/MI NFA N/O/F n `9 '� 27,048.43 sq. ft. NORTH STREET REALTY 11° „y �3 LOT 3 0.621 CO. Y D • ••e n a.o LOT 4 22,441.11 sq. ft. 492.43' z OWNER AND APPLICANT: 0.515 ac. Iso' 3 40.15'20' E 1f2.A3, m9.� WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. IES.aa' t�0° z 104,051.22 sq. ft. W R N� Tn 1030 E. PUTNAM AVE. TOTAL 2.389 CO. wePi4 W ALL eG �" Ayre _ a GREENWICH, CT. 06836 . . n I FOUND caw. uorA HO�H BUILDING ZONE DISTRICT: HB (HAMLET/BUSINESS) —Lt FIRE DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE < w o TEST HOLE DATA TEST HOLE DUG BY MCOONALO CEOSCIENCE a O B $g LOT 64 O I€ 4 LOT(2 LOT Q LOT ® � i pf x a. o pS o 'r�J1 uWIY SILTY Moen U • .:w^€ iM AI 3 nR V • GYt-�I.Q rFf F _ 8 to C/-) ..ill al, HOLE oai3 • foR rsV�H A• f�Q w PAWaRtape.ao .wouWx VST n R IH.our 1DRINS 00W Z a9El WIe.MYNW �� W m 'ryn3 p a' - x• W Itra`�. To rwc ao edenlaM EIfln,"`�`�`Krr " n n 403.gs' A5 PER SURVET' Hy CQ OQ an N.Y.S. Lic. No. 49668 G WDA'" ^' sIEEr eWl: i = n ROOEftICK V/JI TVL D1TFD to/18/g8 . foo• si m¢r A sagpl cool,lov 142.51' 1seAo' tE0.0a' _ u.we' & mxc IraIL 402.RAND 36' r23.91 P.,IE 111wx r.rz " L=38.63'. . ^. . N 39'38'20 N MN12'1o' w AS PER SURVEY BY "�� 567.22' pyEy By Ta muss sxu rllOfOE➢awa CONIC SURVEYORS DATED ]/1/R].Av- OwaE �Ta " .y", Aaa,r mW7 RO]DEERICN-iVMl�l�'I�IL M1FD 10/16/ge p r r . 2L3 as * . . 134 Joseph A. Ingegno W IeW PAWYfM m E ApaiD deal, FN9O1! � GRIFFING STREET - _ Land Surveyor a-I atAv Hounrw m wawa - _ _ I-1/9'MPIwLT wFMWJ iErME URm M 4� -'I _ _ agpVfp_MI65 — 17' PUS Title Surveys - Subdivisions - Site Plans - Construction Layout PHONE (516)727-2090 Fax (516)722-5093 OMCES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS One Union Square P.O. Box 1931 Aquebogue, New York 11931 Riverhead, New York 11901 98-51 OA I I I' I KEY MAP TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM SCALE 1 " =600• TYPICAL PLOT PLAN ("OT TO SITop OEM. N C� nXl4xE0 aWaE (NOT TO SCALE) TEST HOLE DATA ngEPwNTgexiCBT6]fCWEIECNEq 2, I. IDCNXO� w.,amaNl. IXBECr.naCF /—nN191aRI➢E MINOR SUBDIVISION Blnlm r CRP ml,i. r oFFP mm. GAgF I„ON Cplei m cgN]E TEST HOLE DUG BY M DOHA 0 - 0 1 N A vIII ".,pE I same min uix a e. PROP`"" UNE ' ' — H a — PREPARED FOR SWM LMM p Mar ;9 Ga.9 WILLIAM J . BAXTER , JR . L Ia,WY SILTY $VIM $ p1fFlE p„aM AM DEPOT UNE LI WELL i. - SITUATED AT On TO A gSEPTICI-"TANK (I) • -a CUTCHOGUE I YIMIMVM Y➢IM TAXX—M. IS 1 pA aW➢N9 _ NN, e• PoNT. ,._rAME... q._C 'p,P TOWN OF S0UTH0LD C NORTH SRtEEE ,P E f11III. 5Iw1 ='E uixlMUM coxNgt3wE sgplum of;Coo p.l AT xe bets. �n f? ]. W.W.TIICNH65 DRE A MINIMUM ap Y. A TCP 1MCANEAS OF C AND A W CK!CACNNL6 or 4' ALL wAL15, WROM INp 16P SW1L Cryl'VN gpNRNKyX6 m BE515F AN MPL1E6 FORCE OF O00 ytl SUFFOLK COU N T Y, 3; ,.ALL JpIN,S SxVL !E .Al.gp $o TMT„IE iA4N I$ UL BE"W.. NEW YORK O 2 . 5 TRE SEPTIC TA SK I= BE IHOF OAMR It o AN IN All EAECIIONE ('MM A LL4Y m,EPVILE aE x l/f) "•B•r� INI FINEW A min. ITS 1MCN NI OF COMPAl16) SWD On Pm OMYEL TO V OOMSE SWD e.A 16' ruin. DISIINCE BEMEEN $LpIIC TIgIN ANN HOUSE SHILL BE MVMVNPo SCALE 1 a y agOVNV WA1FA � •� S N 4O3.9B' •SNF}-� NUILDING ' p 6 =40 GRIFFING STREET \ — -- SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 LEACHING POOL _ • . AREA DATA I. MI RNA. I12'LEADEN0 S„8- N[a LS Sp6 .a M$IDEWALL ALV. — IEtTINC 12' DEI ME TO DE Wx51RJT1ED OF PRFIASI RENFORCW CONCRETE (OR EDUAL) TOTAL AREA ASEPTIC „ a" IFA'"No SI=A's, VIUD WINES AVD/oq SV85 104,091 .58 sq. ft. S ALL I. 51WL eE'V PREGSr ONToNo PoHCgErr (UP EDW1J TANK . 27,168.56 5 }}, 4.A A ,0' ruin 66FMCE pEFAEEEN' LF 1. POOLS MD MATER LINE SRVL or NANTARTO LOT 1 E1 5.M e' Mn. gSFMCE EPTEN AAL IEICKIN4 Po0 SIWL DE MNMNNEU 29 G a C 0.624 ac. n. ANI' Mn BUANCE OEI'MEEN ALL LEICNIxO POoIS AM SEPTIC TANK SIWL BE MUMuxEO. J m LEACHING i U. ,T. 27,393.12 s ft. LOT 2 IN 0.629 CO. DISTRICT IS 01100010SE SECTION APPEARLL 102 LOCK 05 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY US FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED ROAD LOT 3 27,048.43 Sq. ft. OCTOBER 15, 1998 AND THAT ALL CONCRETE 0.621 ac. MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS: ■ HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS ARE THE EXISTANCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS CORRECTLY SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL LOT 4 22,441 .11 sq. ft. AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. IF AND GEODETIC DETAILS ARE CORRECT NORTH STREET - 0.515 ac. ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. L -- TOTAL 104,051.22 sq. ft. 2.389 ac. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THE SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED HAUPPAUGE. N.Y. BY THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF RIVERHEAD BY RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL DATED out. BUILDING TONE DISTRICT: HB (HAMLET/BUSINESS) BY FIRE DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE CHAIRMAN PLANNING BOARD This is to certify that 'he proposed Realty SMbdiMbian or D.vel.pmTt NOTES: far m the with a total of lot Mae 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS: iPARE REFERENCED TO AN ASSUMED DATUM. approved an the abovrl data Water Suppllae and Sewage Disposal FodllRies must conform to construction do IAINE. in effect of the time 2. IF SILTY SAND IS FOUND IN THE EXCAVATION FOR THE SANITARY Of comWction and are subject to vepamte ordspermIn pfect at to those standards. This .ppmral shall be v lid my if the malty eubdivivion/ IT MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CLEAN SAND. d.v.I.IMAI map I. dIy filed MILK the County clerk within one year 3. DEWATER AS NECESSARY TO EXCAVATE. of this data consent Is hereby given for the flung of this map on which this endomem.ntapp..m in the Mae of the County Clark in 4. S.C.D.H.S. REFERENCE No. SIO-96-006 accord.... th the p .MIWtons of the Public Health Low and the IF Suffolk County Suntory Cods. STANLEY G, C 1 SE" � 60' & HELEN B. CASE 5 3750'I0" E ID0.00 FOUND CONC, MON OWNER AND APPLICANT: J...ph H. Baler, P.E. W ON n DlDlMldon of Envimn-.W-1 Ouolly, WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. �I UN �\ wNMG� cu vi 1030 E.PUTNAM AVE. I � N/0/F N �m �> NORTH STREET REALTY &a GREENWICH, CT. 06836 • IN IN A n aT 100' I " 5 4015'20' E 492.43' z �m WI 165.00' 165.00' 162.43' m, V 1 •' Eq • 4 . M In I AllU O ' FO G £ FOUN MON 1 a •. 4 0 LOT( LOT © LOT 4) LOT }w b Ya i3Y o II'I' IF V 1 hI TEST HOLE 3 m ' Nd o os� UV 121998 j b n x .301 PIPE • o o M,b> m ) �o o Southold Town IN 1� PROPOSED B'x4'x6' "� H " 9 Planning Board TDO' CATCH H451Nst UN 142.51' mp 40396' AS PER SURVEY BY N� R=23.91' 165.OD' 160.00' 99.56' . FOUND RODERICK VAN TYUL GATED 10/16/96 N 3938'2 W 402.36' L=38.63'- N 38'39'10 W AS PER SURVEY BY MIN`''I. �°� .I tout MON. N.Y,S, LIc. No. 49668 • PECONIC SURVEYORS OAT�F/W1/97 x '"}'A" RODER67. VAN TYUL 0 TEV 1BY 0 16/96 „y - e • , 2}..T' f 35,7 . • 253 EDGE or PAVEMiur , - T : . . : :A M : . , Joseph A. Ingegno GRIFFING STREET - _ _ _ o Land surveyor PpLL Title Surveys — Subdivisions — Site Plans — Construction Layout PHONE (516)727-2090 Fax (516)722-5093 OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS One Union Square P.O. Box 193E Aqueboque, New York 11931 Riverhead, New York 11901' ,