HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-70.-1-6
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR 010- VITAL STATISTICS
.
Su flFi <..B""
1'10
~.
.
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765-1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
May 31, 1990
Isaac Saidmehr
97 Crow's Nest Court
Manhasset, New York 11030
Dear Mr. Saidmehr:
The Southold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on May 22, 1990,
granted the change of zone from "A-C" to "AHD" on your property on the
westerly side of NYS Route 25, Southold. The change of zone is conditioned
upon certain covenants and restrictions which are to run with the land in
perpetuity.
I am enclosing a certified copy of the Town Board's resolution containing
the covenants and restrictions. Please have the covenants and restrictions
prepared and, prior to recording, submit them to Harvey A. Arnoff, Southold
Town Attorney, for his approval. The change of zone will not become
effective until after Mr. Arnoff is in receipt of the recorded document.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
.~,/~~
~J~
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Enclosure
cc: Merlon E. Wiggin, Peconic Associates'
Southold Town Attorney Arnoff ./
Southold Town Planning BoardV"
~"'-'-
'f'''\ -",-.
, I ("
,if n .'. ?
:' i ,,") ,""
,
"
) .<
i JlJN - I /990
"'--..,
41
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR Of VITAL STATISTICS
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
.
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765.1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 .
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MAY 22, 1990:
WHEREAS, Southold Villas, Inc., by petition dated December 29, 1987, petitioned
the Town Board of the Town of Southold for a change of zone on certain property
located on the westerly side of NYS Route 25, Southold, from "A-C" Agricultural-
Conservation District to "AHD" Affordable Housing District; and
WHEREAS, the said petition was referred to the Southold Town Planning Board and
Suffolk County Department of Planning for their recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board, pursuant to due notice, held a public hearing thereon
on the 27th day of March, 1990, at 8:00 P.M., at which time all interested persons
were given an opportunity to be heard; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED that Southold Villas, Inc. be and they hereby are granted the relief
demanded in said petition, subject to the following terms and conditions, which
terms and conditions shall be incorporated in covenants and restrictions by Southold
Villas, Inc. which covenants and restrictions shall run with the land in perpetuity:
1. That a one hundred foot buffer zone shall be created on the east side
of the property consisting of vegetative screening as specified by the
Planning Board of the Town of Southold.
2. That in the event a purchaser of a vacant parcel of real property chooses
to resell same prior to any improvements being erected thereupon then
said sale shall be subject to the following terms and conditions:
a. The sale price shall be determined in the following manner:
The purchase price paid by the purchaser increased by the
consumer price index from the date of purchase to the date of sale.
b. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, prior to being permitted
to sell said parcel the purchaser shall first offer same to the Town
of Southold at a price consistent with paragraph "a" above. Said
offering shall be in the form of a writing and shall be deemed to
not be exercised by the Town either upon their refusal to purchase
or alternatively the passage of 30 days from the date of receipt of
notification of intent to sell.
c. Any profit secured by the seller of a vacant parcel of real"property
over that set forth above and received by said pr~perty'-at time of
sale shijll be paid over to the Town of South~~<;ljf9r'..affordable
housing purposes. Y'.': _ .
'~ ~.."
',. ~' '
~outhold Villas
.)
.
\
3. Only qualified purchasers under the guidelines promulgated by the Town
under its Affordable Housing Ordinances shall be qualified to purchase
said parcel except as set forth above.
4. In the event of a resale of any dwelling units within ten years of
purchase the maximum resale price shall be determined in the manner
specified in Section 100-56 of the Code of the Town of Southold.
However, the portion of the resale price in excess of the maximum
allowable resale price shall be divided between the resale seller and the
Town in the following proportions:
Year of Resale Percentage Percentage
After Purchase to Owner to Town
1st 0% 100%
2nd 10% 90%
3rd 20% 80%
4th 30% 70%
5th 40% 60%
6ili 5" 5"
7th 60% 40%
8th 70% 30%
9th 80% 20%
10th 90% 10%
The property of Southold Villas, Inc., subject of this change of zone from "A-C"
to "AHD" consists of all that certain tract or parcel of land situate in the village
and Town of Southold, Colinty of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and
described as follows: BEGINNING at a granite monument on the westerly line of
Main Street and the southeasterly corner of land of Francis M. Gage; running
thence along said westerly line of Main Street, South 130 00' West 100.0 feet to a
concrete monument and land of Marguerite H. Young; thence along said land of
Marguerite H. Young, two courses, as follows: (1) North 770 00' West 120.0 feet
to a concrete monument; thence; (2) South 210 56' West 126.42 feet to a concrete
monument and land of Baker; thence along said land of Baker and land of George
H. Smith Estaste, North 810 12' 20" West 540.46 feet to a granite monument and
land of Frank Bly Estate; thence along said land of Frank Bly Estates, two
courses, as follows: (1) North 120 50' 10" East 28.0 feet to a granite monument;
thence (2) North 760 43' 10" West 895,92 feet to a stone and post and land of Diller
Brothers; thence along said land of Diller Brothers, North 310 I' 60" East 709.83
feet to a granite monument and land of Arthur B. Gordon; thence along said land
of Arthur B. Gordon, South 420 49' 50" East 384.77 feet to a concrete monument;
thence southeasterly and then easterly along other land of Jonathan H. Terry 774.6
feet more or less, to the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of Helen
Virginia Cleveland; thence along said land now or formerly of Helen Virginia
Cleveland, South 650 51' 20" East, 127.2 feet to a concrete monument on the
southwesterly corner of said land of Francis M. Gagen; thence along said land of
Francis M. Gagen, South 600 56' East 182.68 feet to the point or place of
beginning. Also, all that tract or parcel of land situate in the village and Town
of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as
follows: BEGINNING at. the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of Helen
Virginia Cleveland and running thence westerly and then northwesterly along other
land of Jonathan H. Terry above described 774.5 feet, more or less, to a concrete
monument and land of Arthur B. Gordon; thence along said land of Arthur B.
Gordon, three courses, as follows: (1) North 300 37' East 150.07 feet to a concrete
-,outhold Villas
,)
.
monument; thence (2) South 720 46' 10" East 474.11 feet to a concrete monument;
thence (3) South 730 12' East 238.03 feet to a concrete monument and land of Rose
M. Smith; thence along said land of Rose M. Smith and said land now or formerly
of Helen Virginia Cleveland, South 170 20' 40" West 260.2 feet to the point of
beginning.
~h;l';d~~
~. Terry If
Southold Town Clerk
May 29, 1990
\'
"/1 )
, I
J
,
.
Town HaIl, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York
11971
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
FROM:
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman~/JS
Members of the Planning Board
RE:
Petition for Change of Zone of Southold Villas for
change from "A-C" to "ARD" on property located north
of SR 25, approximately 1108' east of Ackerly Pond
Lane, Southo1d. SCTM * 1000-070-01-06.
March 27, 1990
Date:
The Planning Board wishes to go on record as opposing this
change of zone application. The following is the Planning
Board's resolution of March 26, 1990.
WHEREAS the Town Board is holding a public hearing on the change
of zone petition of Southold Villas, Inc., to change the zone of
18.021 acres from Agricultural-Conservation to Affordable
Housing District,
BE IT RESOLVED That the Planning Board feels that this
affordable housing project should not be approved at this time.
The reasons for this recommendation are as follows:
1. There are serious problems inherent in the affordable
housing legislation as represented by the Affordable
Housing District section of the Zoning Code, and the
current legislation grants a developer considerable
economic incentive to provide affordable housing, but
also puts the Town at the risk of losing these lots to
the real estate market seven years after they are
created. As a result, the Town will be forced to
continually downzone properties to half-acre density
throughout the Town in order to meet the affordable
housing need. The Planning Board feels that once
desireable, affordable housing is created, it should
be permanent.
\
.
This Board is concerned, also, by the precedent that
has been set by the DBM Affordable Housing Project,
otherwise known as Highpoint Meadows. At present, the
Town has no enforceable guarantee that the affordable
housing will be built on the affordable lots in this
subdivision. It is quite possible that some of the
buyers of these lots will sell them on the open market
after holding the land for seven years.
2. The Board is concerned about conce~trating too much
affordable housing in one hamlet. At present, thirty
nine lots are proposed to be created in Greenport, and
twenty eight lots have 'been created in Southold. It is
felt that affordable housing should be made available
throughout the entire Town.
However, the Town has not made any determinations as
to how many and what type of affordable housing units
are needed; nor how many units should be located
within each hamlet. A clear policy statement of goals
and objectives should be drafted to guide the Town
Board and the Planning Board in its efforts to provide
affordable housing fox Town residents.
"
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOTI L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (5\6) 765-\938
MEMORANDUM
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa
P.O. Box \179
Southold, New York 1\97\
Fax (516) 765-\823
TO:
Scott Louis Harris, Supervisor
Members of the Town Board
James McMahon, Community Development Director
FROM:
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ~?
RE:
Southold Villas Affordable Housing Project
Change of Zone Petition
70- I-G:,
DATE:
May 21, 1990
The Planning Board has reviewed its position on the Change
of zone petition for Southold Villas.
The Board feels that the change of zone, if approved,
should be subject to conditions that would require the housing
to remain affordable for a minimum of 30 years from its
construction, if not longer. The Planning Board also feels that
the price is to be covenanted as stated in the applicant's
proposal.
These conditions should be filed as covenants and
restrictions on the land.
.
PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INc.
St..ti~il_:,:-.
.
Pe:, /.
vS ~s)
Environmental Planners & Consultants
One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672
Greenport, New Yark 11944
(516) 477-0030
Fax (516) 477-0198
March 26, 1990
Southold Town Board
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, L. 1.
New York - 11971
Re:
Southold
To Amend
And Map.
Villas Proposal
Zoning Ordinance
(0 - 1- r,..
Dear Board Members:
In preparation of public hearing on subject project to be
held on March 27, 1990, and in response to comments received
at the Public Hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement, enclosed are six (6) copies of the revised Site
Plan.
The principal Change is the increase in buffer zones
requested by the public at the previous public hearing.
Sincerely,
PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
~~~M.E.
President
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Isaac Saidmehr ( )
MEW/i:outhold Town ~L~nn.i.~g B..oard) \J
_...~ -
............
,.,
,..-\. 1,\' ..
-.\\~)f-~~'--'
\\.":\'
,; h ~
:.Iil'.!
. ;...~,_. ".
./,
":-.."
'.-.....
7" .-
P8
Subr/~
(~1)
4
~
Public Hearing - Southold Villas
I _. ,I
. ,.
Von Kuhen. Representing New Century Corp. of New York.
(Affordable Home Developers - offices ln Riverhead)
Planning to
affordab I e
development.
work
slnqle
with Southold Villas. by buildinq the 18
fami ly homes which form 1/2 of the
New Century Corporation will prepare aa application to the
NYS Affordable Housing Corporation to obtaln mortaqe
subsidies of $25.000 for each local family who purchases one
of these houses. (Targeted to families with annual lncomes
of $34.000 to $42.0001.
Houses will be sold at an averaae prlce of $78.000
ranging from $68.500 to $87.500.
Expect to offer 3 home models stick built with full
basements. ranch. cape and salt box styles. ranging from
1040 to 1248 (average 1144) square feet. 3 bedrooms. 1 or 2
bathrooms. Designed to fit with the surrounding community.
Marketing
Southold.
houses.
to assure
for these units will be controlled by the Town of
to assure that Southold residents obtain these
Similarly. the town can control deed restrictions.
that the houses remain affordable in the future.
Concerns of Southold Planning Board:
1. 7 vear Re-sale Restriction
we will establish covenant
which maintains affordability for 30 years.
2. Affordable Lot sale doesn't guaranty affordable home sale
This project goes beyond Code requirements:
Income Max $46.762 ---------- $34.000 - $42.000
House Cost $89.928 ---------- $68.500 - $78.000 - $87.500
House Size (min.) 850 ------- 1040 - 1144 - 1248 sq ft
3. Concentration of Affordable Homes in Southold Area:
DBM's ProJect. Plus this 18 = 40+ affordable homes
in Southold Scnool District.
For the current Town-AHC program for 14 houses /
received 210 apDlications ! 161 qualified.
over 40 applicants were from the
Southold and Peconic area - i.e. no lmpact
on school distrlct.
~ ~ [~ fffj,
curren~ ~tFi-&TTtS" "or
il'!:.' MAR28199J
'!I' r ,.
'.,-:\-"
We can also provide top priority to
the school district.
&
~
In summary. we have created a development plan for this
affordable development which answers all of the potential
concerns. This is the most attractive affordable housing
package which the Town of Southold could ask for.
~, ~
.
C~~~/)f'M
..
SEQR
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NOlice of Determination of .Non.Significance
Lead Agency:
Town Board of the
Town of Southold
Addtess:
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Dale.'
March 5, 1990
This notice is i$sued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, and local law # Chapter 44, of
the imolememing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Envir<)nmental Quality Review)
of the t:nvironmental Conservation Law.
The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below willuot
nave a significant effect on the environment.
Tille o[ Actioll.'
Southold Villas, Inc.
Ackerly Pond Lane, Southold
Change of Zone Petition
SCTM #1000-070-01-006
SEQR S/alu.t.'
Ur.IiSlCd Action
Location:
Tile j)(!)jcct io ~ocated cn the "cst side of NYS Rc'ule 25. approximate I
1,500 feet north of Ackerly Pond Lane, in the Hamiel and
Town of Soctl:c'ld, Suffolk Coum)'. New York.
Ptoje....t D~e ; ci"@ t ~ "JJ It
n .-.-
r ~'" - 6 ~
L ".
The project involves lhe pro!,o,ed rezoning of an 18,021 acre parcel
of t.rld f;om tho current "AC" :!oning district (~sricullure'
conservation. SO,Coo ZqU:,(C foot 10(s),10 the "AHD" district
(,[fordable homes dbldct), for the purpose of conMructing
eighteen (18) "ff"rclable single family home<, and eighteen
(18) lownholl<~ unit,.
Pagd of3
5)
.
.
South old VIII"" Inc.
Ne&slhe n.c1arnllon
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
This determination is issued in full consideration oithe criteria for dete:mination of
significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11. In addition, to the Long Environmental
As~essment Form Parts I, II and III, which was prepared in conjunction with this project
review, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement was completed in com?liance with an
extensive scopin$ and review process. A Draft EIS was accepted by the fown Board of the
Town of Southold, and was circulated for public and interagen(:y comment in accordance
with 6 NYCRR Part 617.8 (dl. A public hearing on the Draft EIS was conducted by the
Town Board on February 6, f990. There were no substantive comments received or heard
by the Town Board as a result of the comment period or hearing. In addition, the Town
Board has fully considered the Draft EIS and cfocumentation pertaining to the
environmental review process for this project, and hereby finds that based upon this
documentation, the project will not result in sil;lnificant adverse environmental impact. Some
beneficial in~pacts will be derived as a result ot project implementation. This Negative
Declaration is thereio,~ issued in accordance With 6 NYCRR Part 617.8 (e)p), which states
as fol!ows: 'lVo final EIS need be prf!pared if' on rile basis of the draft EIS, ana comments made
thereon, the lead agency has detennined thar the action will nor hal:a a significant effect on the
em";'romnent. A negative declaration must rhcn bc prepared and filed in accordance with this
Part."
The following specific re:lsons are offered in support of this determination:
1)
The change of zoning WillllO: adversely effect groundwater quality as compared to
the present use and water quality levels.
2)
TIle change of zone will not aJverse1y effect areas with significant constraints
regarding soils or topography.
3)
Thue wer.~ no significant wildlife specks or habitats identified in conn.:ction with the
project site. The majority of the ,i:e contain, fruit orchard vegetation.
The proposed use is considered ti) be compatible with surrounding zonin$ as it
invo[ves single and attached residential housing, Site design will be conSIdered at the
time of site plan review by the Planning Bonrd, at which time open areas, buffering
and re-vegetation mJ.Y be finalized in accordance with mitigation proposed in the
Draft EIS.
4)
The proje.;t offers much needed alternate housing to residents of the Town of
S,?uthold, by rrovid,ing s,~',:"ral ~ot;sing types, inc!uJil1g constr~ction of eighteen (18)
attordab1e 1I0ltS. Tne project Will increase tax revenue, and w1l1 not create an undo
burdon on tiansport3tloll or communtlty seiVke resources.
Fur Fur:her I nform3tion:
Contacr Person:
Address:
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Sou!hold, New York 11971
(516) 765-1938
Phone No.:
Pagel (If 3
.
~
.
Soulhold Villas, Inc.
N.gatlve Declaratlon
Copies of this Notice Sent to:
Commissioner - New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233-0001.
Regional Director - N'YSDEC, Building 40, The Loop Road, SUNY at Stony Brook,
Stony Brook, New York 11794
SQut.hold Zanins. Board of Appeals, SOllthold, New York
Southold Town iioard & Clerk, . Southold, New York
Southold Planning Board, Southo!d, New York
Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Riverhead, New York
Sufiolk Countv Planning Commission, Hauppauge, New York
Applicant - Southold Villas, Inc.
Peconic Associates
NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of L.I., Hauppauge, NY
Village of Greenport
Southold Town Building Department
Pagd or 3
"
.
sue,Fi ~
() ~;) /I
~~ !:"274~
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSAL
TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP
Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the Code
of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, a public hearing will be
held by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, at the Southold Town Hall,
Main Road, Southold, New York, at 8:00 o'clock P.M., on the 27th day of
March, 1990, on the proposal of Southold Villas, Inc. to amend the Zoning
Code (including the Zoning Maps) of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,
New York, by changing from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to
"AHD" Affordable Housing District, all that certain tract or parcel of land
situate at Southold, Town of Southold, bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a granite monument on the westerly line of Main Street
(NYS Route 25) and the southeasterly corner of land of Francis M. Gagen;
running thence along said westerly line of Main Street, South 130 00' West
100.0 feet to a concrete monument and land of Marguerite H. Young; thence
along said land of Marguerite H. Young, two courses, as follows: (1) North
770 00' West 120.0 feet to a concrete monument; thence (2) South 210 56' West
126.42 feet to a concrete monument and land of Baker; thence along said land
of Baker and land of George H. Smith Estate, North 810 12' 20" West 540.46
feet to a granite monument and land of Frank Bly Estate; thence along said
land of Frank Bly Estate, two courses, as follows: (1) North 120 50' 10" East
28.0 feet to a granite monument; thence (2) North 760 43' 10" West 895.92
feet to a stone and post and land of Diller Brothers; thence along said land
of Diller Brothers, North 310 I' 60" East 709.83 feet to a granite monument
and land of Arthur b. Gordon; thence along said land of Arthur B. Gordon,
South 420 49' 50" East 384.77 feet to a concrete monument; thence south-
easterly and then easterly along other land of Jonathan H. Terry 774.6 feet,
more or less, to the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of Helen
Virginia Cleveland; thence along said land now or formerly of Helen Virginia
Cleveland, South 650 51' 20" East, 127.2 feet to a concrete monument on the
southwesterly corner of said land of Francis M. Gagen, South 600 56' East
182.68 feet to the point or place of beginning. Also, all that tract or parcel
of land situate in Southold, Town of Southold, bounded and described as
follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of
....,., . ,.,
Helen Virginia Cleveland and running thence westerl)l:,~v'd~t~>>nF,n6rthwesterIY
>. ("
along other land of Jonathan H. Terry above described::774'~f\~e~1lS ~e or
less, to a concrete monument and land of Arthur B. Cordon; thence along
.
Page 2 - Southold Villas, Inc.
.
said land of Arthur B. Gordon, three courses, as follows: (1) North 300 37"
East 150.07 feet to a concrete monument; thence (2) South 720 46' 10" East
474.11 feet to a concrete monument; then ce (3) South 730 12' East 238.03
feet to a concrete monument and land of Rose M. Smith; thence along said
land of Rose M. Smith and said land now or formerly of Helen Virginia
Cleveland, South 170 20' 40" West 260.2 feet to the point of beginning.
Containing 18.021 l'lcres.
Any person desiring to be heard on the proposed amendment should
appear at the time and place above so specified.
DATED: February 27, 1990.
JUDITH T. TERRY
SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
*
*
*
PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, MARCH 8, 1990, AND FORWARD ONE (2) AFFIDAVIT
OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK, TOWN HALL, MAIN
ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971.
Copies to the following:
The Long Island Traveler-Watchman
The Suffolk Times
Town Board Members
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
Merlon Wiggin, Peconic Associates, Inc.
Isaac Saidmehr, Southold Villas, Inc.
_.-~.<.~"i-2,
;- .~-;."'- \~ ~,\ \~:
\\ '0 ,,;;:,",",.<~
: \ '.-'.'\ ~ _ I) ,g9(\
,-"". ~~\<.
-,1,
, '-~'
-.--"
r.
.
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York
11971
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
February 26, 1990
J. Kevin McLaughlin
Attorney At Law
828 Front Street, P.O. Box 803
Greenport, NY 11944
Re: Request to be notified of all actions pertaining to
Southold Villas project.
Dear Mr. McLaughlin:
The Planning Board has reviewed your letter to the Town
Board dated February 8, 1990. In this letter you requested that
the Planning Board keep you apprised of any and all proceedings
related to the Southold Villas project.
While the Board understands your concerns, and that of your
client, it finds it cannot accept responsibility for notifying
you personally of any and all proceedings relating to this
project. It is not possible for us to honor such requests given
the volume of the daily workload.
When public hearings for preliminary and final approval are
scheduled, they will be advertised in the local papers in
advance of Planning Board meetings. In the meantime, please feel
free to review the file on regular basis and to call staff to
inquire as to the status of the application.
Very Truly Yours,
~~h
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. /' ~
Chairman
cc: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
~
~6 - r/l-
f?6 .
;&,. ;ihd~~/
/
"'\
CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES
ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS
February 12, 1990
Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Southold Villas, Inc.
SCTM No. 1000-070-01-06
?EGIVED
::.:? ~ ~S
':(;,~n
;~~,,'i_~.!~: -~
Dear Judy:
Thank you for forwarding a copy of the transcript from the public hearing on the
Draft EIS for the above referenced project. We understand the comment period on the
Draft EIS will end on February 16, 1990, in order to provide ten (10) days for additional
comments subsequent to a public hearing as per Part 617 8 (d)(3).
We have reviewed the accepted Draft EIS for the above referenced project. Please
be advised that our only comments pertain to the outstanding items expressed in our letters
of July 10, 1989 and December 8, 1989. Therefore, we have no additional comments to add
at this time.
Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to the Southold Town Board, and
please do not hesitate to contact this office if you haole any questions.
Very tr~!IIY ours,
~.....// ~/') /
/ /h' ,-
.-cc ~ ~-~.,..
harles J. VoorhIs
. .
54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455
RtC~lvm
j: .%v?n- AIo~s/!"mff~",
ATI'ORNEY AT77-----'v
828 FRONT STREET. P. O. BOX 803
GREEN PORT. NY 11944
sut<,/779.:;
--r~- r /l- - tPL}
b..~~~/;/dI'/t<l/
..,
.....
.
(516) 477.1016
FEB 1 3 \990
Sonthn1rl T~, ""1_~1,
February 8, 1990
Southold Town
Town'Hall
Main Road
Southold, NY
Board
11971
Re:
Southold Villas, Inc. - AHD Zone Change
Application
Dear Members of the Board:
As I stated on the record at the public hearing in the
above-referenced matter held on February 6, 1990, I represent
Flower Hill Building Corporation, the owner of the parcel adjoining
the Southold Villa, Inc. parcel to the south. My client's parcel
consists of approximately 27 acres.
Again, my client does not oppose the change of zone
application by Southold Villas. Our position is that if the AHD
zoning is granted to Southold Villas, my client will seek to change
the designation of its parcel to AHD.
I have enclosed a letter sent by my client to peconic
Associates, Inc. dated July 20, 1988, which clearly outlines its
position and the basis thereof. I hereby request that all town
boards, including the Southold Town Planning me apprised
of any and all proceedings related to the project.
JKM/lmt
enclosure
cc: Southold Town Planning Board
Flower Hill Building Corporation
""'__~_~_''''''''''''~~M''~_~'_'
I.I~~' r~ fOJ R Ii WI i~
! n "' l!D LS U 'u "
IUU!'~-'-'-'-'
L~,~.:.~
SOUT"jOtO TL'r.;',
~~_~__..._~lk~~!N!I-:': ,-.
......")
~ <.~;;
THOMAS E. UHL.
. ';Rli:;olCF~T
,
.
.
- -
TEL~Pt-lONe.
692'.4$4$/Ca
fll<o>well." Dillll BUllillJinag C<O>lI."f<O>lI."allli<o>na
6243 JERICHO TURNPIKE
WOODBURY, L. I., N. Y. 11797
July 20, 1988
..
..
'.
peconic Associates, Inc.
One Bootley Alley
P. O. Box 672
Greenport, NY 11944
ATT: Merlon E. Wiggin
Dear Sir:
This is in response to your letter dated June 24, 1988.
In light of your request for a change of zone for the
Southold Villas parcel, we have had to reevaluate our plans
for the adjacent piece which Flower Hill Building Corporation
holds. Based on a review of your application and taking into
account the nature of our property and the development trends
in the Town of Southold, we have decided to file for a similar
change of zone (ie, from agricultural to AHD) should the Town
approve the Southold Villas plan.
We believe a change of zone for our parcel is a benefit
to the Town for the following reasons:
(1) Flower Hill Building's parcel is significantly larger
than the Southold Villas project, thus allowing more opportunities
for low income. housing and effective land use (greenbelt, etc.).
(2) The Southold Villas parcel shares a long and physically
indistinguishable boundary with the Flower Hill Building piece.
Any project on the Flower Hill property, provided it is of .
a similar nature, could be easily integrated with the Southold
Villas property, providing the Town with an unbroken zone
district.
(3) We believe the Flower Hill Building parcel is ideally
suited for development under AHD rules. The terrain is rolling,
affording ample opportunities to take advantage of the parcel .
and minimize any appearance of excess density.
(4) The Flower Hill Building parcel has frontage on
both the Main Road (SR25) and on Ackerly Pond Lane. Any development
would be directed in a manner that would minimize congestion
from increased travel through effective planning and use of
multiple access routes.
,
,
"
.
.
-.
~..
Peconic Associates, Inc.
ATT: Merlon E. Wiggin
-2-
July 20, 1988
(5) The inclusion of the Flower Hill Building parcel
in an AHD district would provide the Town with a unifi~d,
clear and distinct affordable housing district of a convenient
size and shape, and it would also ensure that enough land
would remain available for future residents of the Town who
would otherwise be condemned to live outside of Southold.
Very truly yours,
FLOWER HILL BUILDING CORP.
TTU/cm
Thomas E. Uhl
'.
it
.
s L( 6ft c..C
Pb
ItS
/
,
"
,/
/I
<< (,/, II (/ L'lL'l
/ r-/' ...//~tN,4/~ _,/l1..v.2~.(?/iCt:n,
I A'l'TOHNEY AT LAW
I:l:.!~ FUONT STUEE1'. P. O. UOX tS03
GHEENPOll'l'. NY 11944
(5161 477-lOl6
February 8, 1990
Southold Town
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, NY
Board
11971
Re:
Southold Villas, Inc. - AHD Zone Change
Application
Dear Members of the Board:
As I stated on the record at the public hearing in the
above-referenced matter held on February 6, 1990, I represent
Flower Hill Building Corporation, the owner of the parcel adjoining
the Southold Villa, Inc. parcel to the south. My client's parcel
consists of approximately 27 acres.
Again, my client does not oppose the change of zone
application by Southold Villas. Our position is that if the AHD
zoning is granted to Southold Villas, my client will seek to change
the designation of its parcel to AHD.
I have enclosed a letter sent by my client to peconic
Associates, Inc. dated July 20, 1988, which clearly outlines its
position and the basis thereof. I hereby request that all tmm
boards, including the Southold Town Planning Board, ke me apprised
of any and all proceedings related to the uthold V' 1 project.
JKM/lmt
enclo9-Ure
cc: v'Southold Town Planning Boar
Flower Hill Building Corporation
j=te, 2. 0 \99(\
~-'-,.
\\n B \
ff--\ ~ (~ ~ ~.-J_.2-1""
:,njr--"-- .
\\ n\1 f::e,: 3 \990
\\wL~ \ -
. -,,- ,,-...,-'
\ ~SlR)\:~/;-. '0
I pOL~:'li'lli-,',~'~:_
, r"__'_~'
L ~
"
-~
.
.
~-
.../"
THO)AAS E. UHL.
/"AE;iIDE:HT
,
TELliPHONl;.
(>92-4545/&
flowell" Hill BUllildliImg C<Oll"lF<Oll"oDltli<OlIm
8243 ..JERICHO TURNPIKE
WOODBURY. L. I.. N. Y. 11797
July 20, 1988
'.
Peconic Associates, Inc.
One Bootley Alley
P. O. Box 672
Greenport, NY 11944
ATT: Merlon E. Wiggin
Dear Sir:
This is in response to your letter dated June 24, 1988.
In light of your request for a change of zone for the
Southold Villas parcel, we have had to reevaluate our plans
for the adjacent piece which Flower Hill Building Corporation
holds. Based on a review of your application and taking into
account the nature of our property and the development trends
in the Town of Southold, we have decided to file for a similar
change of zone (ie, from agricultural to AHD) should the Town
approve the Southold Villas plan.
We believe a change of zone for our parcel is a benefit
to the Town for the following reasons:
(1) Flower Hill Building's parcel is significantly larger
than the Southold Villas project, thus allowing more opportunities
for Jow income..housing and effective land use (greenbelt, etc.).
(2) The Scuthold Villas parcel shares a long and physically
indistinguishable boundary with the Flower Hill Building piece.
Any project on the Flower Hill property, provided it is of'
a similar nature, could be easily integrated with the Southold
Villas property, providing the Town with an unbroken zone
district.
(3) We believe the Flower Hill Building parcel is ideally
suited for development under AHD rules. The terrain is rollinq,
affording ample opportunities to take advantage of the parcel
and minimize any appearance of excess density.
(4) The Flower Hill Building parcel has frontage on
both the Main Road (SR25) and on Ackerly Pond Lane. Ani:~evelopment
would be directed in a manner that would minimi ze conge,st!ion.'.._...:.".._ ...".
from increased travel through effect:Ll/e planning and us,,i':of
!nul tiple access routes. :lU'l;, ":C: ? .~C:J
:; L" '-'--
Ib'L-----
SU~i.i;:~~:_J
P" 0:',::
..._--'-.
/
.
.
~
~ "...
peconic Associates, Inc.
ATT: Merlon E. Wiggin
-2-
July 20, 1988
(5) The inclusion of the Flower Hill Building parcel
in an AHD district would provide the Town with a unified,
clear and distinct affordable housing district of a convenient
size and shape, and it would also ensure that enough land
would remain available for future residents of the Town who
would otherwise be condemned to live outside of Southold.
Very truly yours,
FLOWER HILL BUILDING CORP.
TTU/cm
Thomas E. Uhl
i.~ e':.'~).'>--'>'"'''
~ ,
~ i il
.t':.,
, .~ ,
r:,-
----:-:---:--... ..
~ r~"'l \t~ 1!.:, ;:
;, \ D ~-~~-_.. ~_. .
'j .'
1 Ii -j , _~_ _',
\ .. .. ',' ~
\ uu \ ,', ..._ .
b"''''''''''
SCJII" - ;';' "
f12:~~~__:.:-_::-'
-
1
(
1118 - r;'9-
PCk/1,4hWL
'S'I&r;. <...EO
P6
RECEIVED
FE8 1 6 1990
February 14, 1990
~"!Jlhol~ T^"._ rl. .1,
Southo1d Town Board
Southo1d Town Hall
Hain Road
Southo1d, New York 11971
lll'-i-b
, C
Gentlemen:
I am opposed to low income housing at
property known as Southo1d Villas.
This proposed project will cause too
much density, increased traffic on the Hain Road
in this area where we now have more traffic than
we can handle. This project will also cause
po1ution of the water shed.
Please consider this a valid objection
to rezoning of the area in question.
Sincerely
.fL..v.~, ~ 1fl..vvxY.'i[:f-'
Anna L. Burnett
Main Road
Southo1d, New York 11971
"'^~~~{>'\:~:, '-::.:../.-.
f~~"\ \":1 \"cl ':,,....,.,-'
\ \ IC) -<_-...--
\' '(\ \-""--
" .~.; c.-a 7... ~ \ggJ
\,1,., rl;.\J
\" \,
'0,:.; . -
\ ~.~~.~:-
\ ~,:>,..,
r',,~,"
I ...--....'..
\.""...~-
_.~.., "
.
1-'"
.
.
Sl,f6f7tE
Pb
vS
Y' (L/ II ( / ';"If
c/- _/le.:vi-n, ./f1..c..,~?/Ubn,
ATTORNEY A'r LAW
M2B FnONT STREET, P. O. nox 803
GREENPOH'1', NY 11944
(5161477.1016
February 8, 1990
Southold Town
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, NY
Board
11971
Re:
Southold Villas, Inc. - AHD Zone Change
Application
Dear Members of the Board:
As I stated on the record at the public hearing in the
above-referenced matter held on February 6, 1990, I represent
Flower Hill Building Corporation, the owner of the parcel adjoining
the Southold Villa, Inc. parcel to the south. My client's parcel
consists of approximately 27 acres.
Again, my client does not oppose the change of zone
application by Southold Villas. Our position is that if the AHD
zoning is granted to Southold Villas, my client will seek to change
the designation of its parcel to AHD.
I have enclosed a letter sent by my client to Peconic
Associates, Inc. dated July 20, 1988, which clearly outlines its
position and the basis thereof. I hereby request that all tmm
boards, including the Southold Town Planning Board, ke me apprised
of any and all proceedings related to the uthold V' 1 project.
JKM/lmt
enclo9-'dre
cc: v'Southold Town Planning Boar
Flower Hill Building Corporation
~-\f1"i? '
~r-\ IS/,' fiO fiO \ \<;$ \ \II '"__c,c.
\ l ~___,-'''-
\\~~r"~
\ HI, \1 FEB \ 3 1900
\ '. ,; , ~
\LH-\ ~
~_~=I}gr:ii
"
,
I~
.
~-
,.
./
THO)AAS E. UHL
.f~"RE~.Df:hlT
TE:L.liPHON.E.
692'4545/6
rHower HDJH BllJID.HJD.IDlg CorporallD.OIDl
6243 .JERICHO TURNPIKE
WOODBURY. L. I.. N. Y. 11797
July 20, 1988
"
Peconic Associates, Inc.
One Bootley Alley
P. O. Box 672
Greenport, NY 11944
ATT; Merlon E. Wiggin
Dear Sir;
This is in response to your letter dated June 24, 1988.
In light of your request for a change of zone for the
Southold Villas parcel, we have had to reevaluate our plans
for the adjacent piece which Flower Hill Building Corporation
holds. Based on a review of your application and taking into
account the nature of our property and the development trends
in the Town of Southold, we have decided to file for a similar
change of zone (ie, from agricultural to AHD) should the Town
approve the Southold Villas plan.
We believe a change of zone for our parcel is a benefit
to the Town for the following reasons;
(1) Flower Hill Building's parcel is significantly larger
than the Southold Villas project, thus allowing more opportunities
for Jow income. housing and effective land use (greenbelt, etc.).
(2) The Southold Villas parcel shares a long and physically
indistinguishable boundary with the Flower Hill Building piece.
Any project on the Flower Hill property, provided it is of
a similar nature, could be easily integrated with the Southold
Villas property, providing the Town with an unbroken zone
district.
(3) We believe the Flower Hill Building parcel is ideally
suited for development under AHD rules. The terrain is rolling,
affording ample opportunities to take advantage of the parcel
and minimize any appearance of excess density.
(4) The Flower Hill Building parcel has frontage on
both the Main Road (SR25) and on Ackerly P~nd ~ane. Ar~~d~i~9pment
would be directed in a manner that w,?uld m1n1~1ze congt~'9f'Oh"" ..'
from increased travel through effect1ve plann1ng and Uf~I';6f
..1ei,1. .000.. '0.'.'. IU'i F,:;,'.3 '900
/
~
.
/
~
peconic Associates, Inc.
ATT: Merlon E. Wiggin
-2-
July 20, 1988
(5) The inclusion of the Flower Hill Building parcel
in an AHD district would provide the Town with a unifi~d,
clear and distinct affordable housing district of a convenient
size and shape, and it would also ensure that enough land
would remain available for future residents of the Town who
would otherwise be condemned to live outside of Southold.
Very truly yours,
FLOWER HILL BUILDING CORP.
TTU/cm
Thomas E. Uhl
F~'~.... fir"
\ UJ r~.-'-~'.-".
. '
,\ NY\
I !i FEB 3 b::lV
kl,
'I
~ti!:"'"
"t ..J ..:
"
.
-:v 6Pt ~
.Pb
tiS
7(3
fA-
'-
PIIIPtVl"}
SEQR
Title of Proposed Action:.
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF DRAFr EIS
AND
NOTICE OF HEARING fD) ~ @ rn (\\7 K .
Southold Villas, Inc. IJJ] Ji\N 2
-~ ,""'....., ",",bold E 1900
1000-070-01-06 SOUTHOlD TI){:, '..'
PLANNING 2!:)~~.~r)
S.c. Tax Map No:
Lead Agency:
Town Board
Town of Southold
Address:
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York
Date:
January 6,1990
This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 (and Local Law #3, of 1978,
implemented as Chapter 44 of the Town Code) of the implementing regulations pertaining
to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law.
A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been completed and accepted
for the proposed action described below. Comments on the Draft EIS are requested and
will be accepted by the contact person until Februa~ 9, 1990, or ten (10) days after the close
of the public heanng, whichever last occurs. A publtc hearing on the Draft EIS will be held
on February 6, 1990, at 8:00 p.m., at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,
New York. The purpose of the hearing is to solicit comments from the public on the Draft
EIS and particularly on the Environmental Impact issues identified below.
Description of Action:
The project involves the proposed rezoning of an 18.021 acre parcel of land from the
current "A-C" zoning district (allriculture-conservation, 80,000 sq. ft. lots), to the "AHD"
district (affordable homes distnct), for the purpose of constructing eighteen (18) affordable
single family homes, and eighteen (18) townhouse units.
Location:
The project is located on the west side of NYS Route 25, approximately 1,500 feet
north on Ackerly Pond Lane, Hamlet and Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York.
Page 1 or2
,..I
.
.
".
f
~
Notie or Complete DEIS and Hearing
South old Villas
Potential Environmental Impacts:
.
Increase in the intensity of land use above what is currently allowable under existing
zoning, with consideration of resulting impacts.
.
Impact of the proJ;>osed project upon existing land use and zoning in the project
viCinity, with consideration for land use compatibility.
Public need for the project and the ability of the proposed use to provide necessary
alternative housing In the community.
Potential impact upon groundwater resources due to alteration of recharge water
quality.
Loss of open space and alteration of existing wildlife habitat and ecological character
of the existing site.
Potential impact upon cultural resources of the community particularly visual, historic
and pre-historic resources.
.
.
.
.
Copies of the Draft EIS may be obtained from:
Contact Person:
Judith T. Terry
Town Clerk
Address:
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Pilone No.:
516 - 765 - 1801
Copies of this Notice and DEIS Sent to:
Commissioner - NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany,
New York 12233-0001.
Regional Director - NYSDEC, Building 40, The Loop Road, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony
Brook, New York 11794
Regional Permit Administrator - NYS Department of Transportation, Hauppauge, New
York
NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resources Needs of Long Island, Hauppauge, New
York
Southold Town Board and Town Clerk, Southold, New York
Southold Planning Board, Southold, New York
Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Riverhead, New York
Suffolk County Planning Commission, Hauppauge, New York.
Villa\le of Greenport
ApplIcant
Page 2 or2
"
""
.
.
(
contaminated from nitrates and temik (see
Appendix No.2 - Lab Water Tests>. The
development of the property is calculated to
not add to this contamination but allow the
levels to drop over that which have previously
occurred when it was actively farmed.
Nitrogen balance calculations (see Appredix
No.2> show that the recharge nitrogen
concentration rate would be 8.0 mg/L as
compared with the most recent test levels of
10.2 mg/L. The other possible impact to
ground~ater is from buried fuel oil tanks.
Proposed mitigation measures described in
Section VI are such that with the adoption of
them it is anticipated that potential
contamination of recharge groundwater will be
avoided or eliminated.
(
2. Surface Water - The installation of paved
9treets and the temporary loss of ground cover
during construction will adversely impact the
control of drainage. as well as its patterns
and present channels.
Specific mitigation
measures will be necessary to prevent erosion
and to collect and control run-off for
recharge into the aquifer.
l
56
Rev.
.
.
r
ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL NITROGEN CONTAMINATION
(
FROM THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
January 12, 1990
This assessment is based on an average of two (2) houses per
acre (population density of 5.4 persons per acre). From the
clustering of both the individual lots and the town houses
it is determined that 22% will be impervious (streets,
drives, and roof surfaces), 40% covered by turf, and }8% by
natural area. From simulated nitrogen data the overall
recharge concentrations on the developed area will average
8.0 mg/L in total leachate to ground water. Sources include
lawn fertilization, sewage, and others with reduced
concentrations possible with control of lawn fertilization
rates.
The expected immediate resultant nitrogen concentrations
would be from the mix of the leachate from the proposed
development 8.0 mg/L and that al~eady in existance in the
ground water from previous agricultural fertilization 10.2
mg/L. The resultant can be calculated as follows:
(
Nitrate Concentration
From Development
+
Existing Nitrate
Concentration
2
8.0 + 10.2
:; 19.1
2
or a 1.1 mg/L decrease as a result of development.
A lower value would be expected as a result of the proposed
fertilization monitoring program recommending an applicatio~
rate of one (1) pound of fertilizer per 1,000 Square Feet,
and also.from a gradual decrease in existing nitrate levels
over time as the area is no longer farmed. It is
reasonable, therefore, to expect the end resultant nitrate
concentration to approach the '8.0 mg/L level, or 2 mg/L le~!!.
than the present. ..
RF.FERENC~S
Hughes,. Henry B. F. and Keith Porter, Land Use and Ground
Water Qua Ii ty in the Pi ne-Barrons of Southampton., Corne 11
University, 198}.
\
~orth Fork Water Sup~ly Plan, Suffolk County.~~w YClr~, ERM-
Northeast/Camp, Dresser & McKee, 198}.
INSERT IN APPENDIX #2
, .-../
{
.,
.
--C?~~ _
h:~,
1/':'"
r" 'I '( i)
"
SEQR
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF DRAFT EIS
AND
NOTICE OF HEARING
Title of Proposed Action:
Southold Villas, Inc.
Ackerly Poud Laud, Southold
S.c. Tax Map No:
1000-070-01-06
Lead Agency:
Town Board
Town of Southold
Address:
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York
Date:
January 6, 1990
This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 (and Local Law #3, of 1978,
implemented as Chapter 44 of the Town Code) of the implementing regulations pertaining
to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law.
A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been completed and accepted
for the proposed action described below. Comments on the Draft EIS are requested and
will be accepted by the contact person until February 9, 1990, or ten (10) days after the close
of the public heanng, whichever last occurs. A publIc hearing on the Draft EIS will be held
on February 6, 1990, at 8:00 p.m., at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,
New York. The purpose of the hearing is to solicit comments from the public on the Draft
EIS and particularly on the Environmental Impact issues identified below.
Description of Action:
The project involves the proposed rezoning of an 18.021 acre parcel of land from the
current "A-C" zoning district (a~riculture-conservation, 80,000 sq. ft. lots), to the "AHD"
district (affordable homes distnct), for the purpose of constructing eighteen (18) affordable
single family homes, and eighteen (18) townhouse units.
Location:
The project is located on the west side of NYS Route 25, approximately 1,500 feet
north on Ackerly Pond Lane, Hamlet and Town of Southold, Suffolk Coun New Y .
ill ~~~::~F,'
Page I of2
SOlin-Irq ,.
PLAl~:~:"i.: ^
,,~ '"
.
.
~
.\
Nolie of Complete DEIS and Hearing
Southold Villas
Potential Environmental Impacts:
*
Increase in the intensity of land use above what is currently allowable under existing
zoning, with consideration of resulting impacts.
*
Impact of the prol?osed project upon existing land use and zoning in the project
viCinity, with consideratIOn for land use compatibility.
Public need for the project and the ability of the proposed use to provide necessary
alternative housing In the community.
Potential impact upon groundwater resources due to alteration of recharge water
quality.
*
*
*
Loss of open space and alteration of existing wildlife habitat and ecological character
of the existing site.
Potential impact upon cultural resources of the community particularly visual, historic
and pre-historic resources.
*
Copies of the Draft EIS may be obtained from:
Contact Persoll:
Judith T. Terry
Town Clerk
Address:
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Phone No.:
516 - 765 - 1801
Copies of this Notice and DEIS Sent to:
Commissioner - NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany,
New York 12233-0001.
Regional Director - NYSDEC, Building 40, The Loop Road, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony
Brook, New York 11794
Regional Permit Administrator - NYS Department of Transportation, Hauppauge, New
York
NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resources Needs of Long Island, Hauppauge, New
York
Southold Town Board and Town Clerk, Southold, New York
Southold Planning Board, Southold, New York
Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Riverhead, New York
Suffolk County Planning Commission, Hauppauge, New York
Village of Greenport
ApplIcant
Page 2 of2
.
.
. '
contaminated from nitrates and temik (see
.
Appendi~ No.2 - Lab Water Tests).
The
development of the property is calculated to
not add to this contamination but allow the
levels to drop over that which have previously
occurred when it was actively farmed.
Nitrogen balance calculations (see Appredl~
No.2) show that the recharge nitrogen
concentration rate would be 8.0 mg/L as
compared with the most recent test levels of
10.2 mg/L.
The other possible impact to
.
groundwater is from buried fuel 011 tanks.
Proposed mitigation measures described in
Section VI are such that with the adoption of
them it is anticipated that potential
contamination of recharge groundwater will be
avoided or eliminated.
2. Surface Water - The installation of paved
streets and ths temporary loss of ground cover
during construction will adversely impact the
control of drainage. as well as its patterns
and present channels.
Specific mitigation
measures will be necessary to prevent erosion
and to collect and control run-off for
recharge into the aquifer.
.
56
Rev.
-~
. '
.
.
.
___.LL.
.
.
ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL NITROGEN CONTAMINATION
FROM THE PROPOS EO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
January 12, 1990
This assessment is based on an average of two (2) houses per
acre (population density of 5.4 persons per acre). From the
clustering of both the individual lots and the town houses
it is determined that 22% will be impervious (streets,
drives, and roof surfaces), 40% covered by turf, and }8% by
natural area. From simulated nitrogen data the overall
recharge concentrations on the developed area will average
8.0 mg/L in total leachate to ground water. Sources include
lawn fertilization, sewage, and others with reduced
concentrations possible with control of lawn fertilization
rates.
The expected immediate resultant nitrogen concentrations
would be from the mix of the leachate from the proposed
development 8.0 mg/L and that al~eady in existance in the
ground water from previous agricultural fertilization 10.2
mg/L. The resultant can be calculated as follows:
Nitrate Concentration
From Development
Existing Nitrate
Concentration
+
2
8.0 + 10.2
= 19.1
2
or a 1.1 mg/L decrease as a result of development.
A lower value would be expected as a result of the proposed
fertilization monitoring program recommending an application
rate of one (1) pound of fertilizer per 1,000 Square Feet,
and also from a gradual decrease in existing nitrate levels
over time as the area is no longer farmed. It is
reasonable, therefore, to expect the end resultant nitrate
concentration to approach the '8.0 mg/L level, or 2 mg/L les!.
than the present. .
REFERENCES
Hughes,. Henry B. F. and Keith Porter, Land Dse and Ground
Water Qual ity in the Pine-Barrons of Southampton., Cornell
University, 198}.
~orth Fork Water Supply Plan, Suffolk County, New Yor~, ERM-
Northeast/Camp, Dresser & McKee, 198}.
INSERT IN APPENDIX #2
TRUSTEES
WILLIAM D. ALLEN
STEPHEN L. CLARKE
DAVID S. CORWIN
GAIL F. HORTON
L"'>" '"
/~ ............ 'l
~G~~
..... . ....- ":T
.. .. . ..-. ~
.. "'"-.a&;:.....,.. ....-1
236 THIRD STREET. P.O. BOX AH
GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944
.
SEPUt~ICE TEL.
~.16) 477-1748
I'OWEIlPLANT TEL.. .
(516) 477-0172
Officers
.
MLLage of Slreenport
INCORPORATED '838
NEW INCOFlPOAATION APAII.. 7, '868
flE.INCORPORATION UNDER GENERAL LAW MA'f 28. 1811.
MAYOR
GEORGE W. HUBBARD
FAX (516) 477-1877
SUPT. OF UTILITIES
JAMES L MONSELL
SUPT. OF WATER & SEWER
H. B. SHERMAN
September 18, 1989
Mr. Isaac Saidmehr
97 Crows Nest Court
Manhansett, N. Y. 11030
Re: Southold Villas
Dear Mr. Saidmehr:
This letter is in answer to our telephone conversation of September
14, 1989.
The Village of Greenport Water Department does not currently have
sufficient well pumping capacity to add additional customers to the water
system. However, the Village Board of Trustees has committed to upgrade
and improve the water system. The engineering annalysis has been completed
for the Village to acquire a $5 million bond issue to accomplish the
upgrade. The SEQRA process has been completed and applications to the DEe
have been submitted to construct new wells for an additional 2 million
gallons of water a day.
The Village is completing the engineering required to activate the new
wells which will supply sufficient water for your development.
At a point during this process when the Village can be assured that
the new wells will be on line and sufficient water available to meet your
needs prior to construction of the development in question, we will
negotiate a contract to supply water as requested.
The forgoing is, of course, subject to any other extenuating
circumstance that may arise.
Very truly yours,
cJ6!JL'N~
-Ita. Sherman
Superintendent of Water & Sewer
HBS:lkm
100 Years of Community Service
.
"
SOUTHOLD VILLAS-LAND
Sept. 9, 1972
ASSESSMENT $5400
18.02 acres @ $250 per acre
Taxes:
Sold Sept. 30, 1986
to Southold Villas
Cost per acre
Amortization (Full price)
Interest 10yrs @ 9 1/2%
Taxes 10 yrs (1919 X 11)
Improvements 2160 @ $120.
Total Max. cost
$5400.
1919.
285,000.
15,816.
450,302.
21,109.'
259,200.
730,611.
36 units - Average land cost. 20,295.
Sale price
Sept. 1986
5yrs 1991
.
30,147. X 18 = 542,646
60,000. X 18 = 1,080,000.
1,622,646.
note AHD 8 lots vis 36
"'" ~
.
/:' ~ LY;;u~A'/-;.,.
ATTORNi;~~---'v
828 FRONT STREET, P. O. BOX 803
GREENPORT, NY 11944
.
COpy FOR YOUR
mroRMATJOH
RECEIVED
(516)477.1016
SOI,th,.,f...f T....,v" Cbr-k
July 22, 1988
,WL 2 5 i988
Southold Town
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, NY
Board
11971
Re:
Southold Villas - AHD Zone Application
Dear Members of the Board:
I have enclosed a copy of my client's letter to peconic
Associates, Inc. in response to his request dated June 24, 1988.
'----' ~ / '.I. .... r" .
/ I. '<.-h-C LY' it}\...)
/' f, W"ln MCLaUg~in
/, ( i
! '
, '
i J
. ,_._,~/
JKM/lmt
Enclosure
.
.
,I ,..,
..., '-
%" ..
"'-tHO. ~AS E. UHL.
REtiIDE':HT
,. .
"
.
TELl:::PHONE
692-4545/6
fRoweJl" HiRR B1llliRJiIDlg COJl"pOJl"aftioIDl
8243 JERICHO TURNPIKE
WOODBURY, L. I.. N. Y. 11797
July 20, 1988
peconic Associates, Inc.
One Bootley Alley
P. O. Box 672
Greenport, NY 11944
ATT: Merlon E. Wiggin
Dear Sir:
This is in response to your letter dated June 24, 1988.
In light of your request for a change of zone for the
Southold Villas parcel, we have had to reevaluate our plans
for the adjacent piece which Flower Hill Building Corporation
holds. Based on a review of your application and taking into
account the nature of our property and the development trends
in the Town of Southold, we have decided to file for a similar
change of zone (ie, from agricultural to AHD) should the Town
approve the Southold Villas plan.
We believe a change of zone for our parcel is a benefit
to the Town for the following reasons:
(1) Flower Hill Building's parcel is significantly larger
than the Southold Villas project, thus allowing more opportunities
for jow income. housing and effective land use (greenbelt, etc.).
(2) The Southold Villas parcel shares a long and physically
indistinguishable boundary with the Flower Hill Building piece.
Any project on the Flower Hill property, provided it is of
a similar nature, could be easily integrated with the Southold
Villas property, providing the Town with an unbroken zone
district.
(3) We believe the Flower Hill Building parcel is ideally
suited for development under AHD rules. The terrain is rolling,
affording ample opportunities to take advantage of the parcel
and minimize any appearance of excess density.
(4) The Flower Hill Building parcel has frontage on
both the Main Road (SR25) and on Ackerly Pond Lane. Any development
would be directed in a manner that would minimize congestion
from increased travel through effective planning and use of
multiple access routes.
.~
.
.
~
"'" l1"y
Peconic Associates, Inc.
ATT: Merlon E. Wiggin
-2-
July 20, 1988
(5) The inclusion of the Flower Hill Building parcel
in an AHD district would provide the Town with a unified,
clear and distinct affordable housing district of a convenient
size and shape, and it would also ensure that enough land
would remain available for future residents of the Town who
would otherwise be condemned to live outside of Southold.
Very truly yours,
FLOWER HILL BUILDING CORP.
TTU/cm
Thomas E. Uhl
.
",. ,,-.,,,,
.. -~ ..,:,v
~:;fV-LF
UTILITY OFFICE TEL.
(516)477.1748
Officers
MAYOR
GEORGE W. HUBBARD
TRUSTEES
STEPHEN L. CLARKE
JEANNE M. COOPER
DAVID S. CORWIN
GAIL F. HORTON
0!Lage of .Yreenport
'NCORPORATED II~.
Hew INCORPORATlfJN APRIL 7. fl..
POWER PLANT TEL.
(516)477-0172
RJ-INCOlllPOIltATION UNDtR CENCRAL ""w MA' 2., "II'''
SUPT. OF UTILITIES
JAMES l. MONSElL
~ ~"'+~/. -
~. ....~:j.
, ~...._. ?r.J-J-J ~.
,':-"6N G. IS L'A"" O~.......
i\.' ... """ -::T
.~-~-"
........... ....
236 THIRD STREET
P.O. BOX AH
GREENPORT. SUFFOLK COUNTY
NEW YORK 11944
May 18, 1988
Mr. James McMahon
Community Development
Town of Southold
Mai n Road
Southold, N. Y. 11971
Dear Mr. McMahon,
The project known as Southold Villas, consisting of 36 units in the Southold
area; 18 affordable housing and 18 townhouses. The loadin9 would be 11,880 gallons
per day, with a peak of 29,700 gallons per day.
The Village Board of Trustees is agreeable to negotiate with you for your
participation in the construction of a second well at Plant No.7. The proposed
new well at Plant No.7 has a cost estimate of $350,000.00. This new well will
pump 500.GPM (720,000 GPD) but will only add 200 GPM (288,000 GPD) to the system.
The reason for the lower capability is that we can not run 7-1 and 7-2 at the
same time.
We hope you can schedule an early meeting with the Vi 11 age Board so that
this project can move ahead. Our schedule shows the engineers completion date
for well 7-2 is July 1988 and the construction completion <late for Well 7-2 is
May 1989.
If 1 can be of further service, please contact me.
JIM: lkm
cc: George Hubbard, Mayor
All Village Trustees
Utility Committee
David Emilits, Planner
Merlon Wiggin, Peconic Associates
Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold
Victor Lessard, Town of Southold
Ver~Ul?)r:mcrJ~
James I. Monsell
Superintendent of Public Utilities
100 Years of Community Service
.
~
'"'i,
/''-....-. - ,- 1.0
Officers
MAYOR
GEORGE W. HUBBARD
TRUSTEES
STEPHEN L. CLARKE
JEANNE M. COOPER
DAVIDS.CORWIN
GAIL F. HORTON
MILage of greenfJort
UTILITY OFFICE TEL.
(516) 477-1748
INCO""O"ATED ,...
,uw INC.OIlI'OIlIllT'ON ...."".1.1...
1U;-INCOJl,.OIlATION U"'OI:" GIENt.....L LAW MAY la, 1...
POWER PLANT TEL.
(516) 477-0172
SUPT. OF UTILITIES
lAMES I. MONSELL
A ~"'+.
~ ~, -
hi ., ...... ..... A;'l'",;;,
. I"_A,~' ."---...-?... ,. ' .
, .....11 ~n '<':........... ~_l ~.
.. ."-QN GIS LA tol 0 ./..
I {\..~ " :;~: . "'::T
-
........." ....A
236 THIRD STREET
P.O. BOX AH
GREENPORT, SUFFOLK COUNTY
NEW YORK 11944
May 18, 1988
Mr. James McMahon
Community Development
Town of Southold
Main Road
Southold, N. Y. 11971
Dear Mr. McMahon,
The project known as Southold Vil~~, consisting of 36 units in the Southold
area; 18 affordable housing and 18 townhouses. The loading would be 11,880 gallons
per day, with a peak of 29,700 gallons per day.
The Village Board of Trustees is agreeable to negotiate with you for your
participation in the construction of a second well at Plant No.7. The proposed
new well at Plant No.7 has a cost estimate' of $350,000.00. This new well will
pump 500. GPM (720,000 GPO) but will only add 200 GPM (288,000 GPO) to the system.
The reason for the lower capability is that we can not run 7-1 and 7-2 at the
same time.
"'-'.-
We hope you can schedule an early meeting with the Village Board so that
this project can move ahead. Our schedule shows the engineers completion date
for well 7-2 is July 1988 and the construction completiori*"date for Well' 7-2 is
May 1989.
If I can be of further service, please contact me.
4it
ver:uII/httrJ~~e
James I. Monsell
Superintendent of Public Utilities
JIM: Ikm
cc: George Hubbard, Mayor
All Village Trustees
Utility Committee
David Emilits, Planner
Merlon Wiggin, Peconic Associates
Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold
Victor Lessard, Town of Southold
..
""'
,=~J
100 Years of Community Service
._ ~'___ __._..._._.~__,"__.___.L.-_:.J_~..--..-,_..__~~.~~...
. -:J
S41 ~d
SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT
S41
MEMORANDUM
TO: James MacMahon, Southold Director of Community Development
.RE: Southold Villas
DATE: April 19, 1988
FROM: David J.S. Emilita, Szepatowski Associates, Inc.
SOUTHOLD VILLAS
CHANGE OF ZONE
Scoping Product - 19 April 88
1) Positive Declaration 2 Feb 88 Attached
2) Scoping Checklist - 21 Mar 88 Attached
3) No documentation received from the Village of Greenport
with reference to connection to the Village water supply
system. Thus it must be included in the EIS. (Not forth
coming as of 19 Apr 88 therefore it is assumed on-site water
will be necessary).
4) The EIS shall contain a section on how the development
will comply with the zoning ordinance affordable housing
provisions.
00 u ::~rnoo
,
'J
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PlANNING BOMiD.. . ~..J
cc: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner
Merlon Wiggin, peconic Engineering
LL'. \'~ . /
. ~ 1?-1J
23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown. RI 02835 (401) 423-0430
SCOPC/\.! q
'. SOlJT/10l-D
617.21
Appendix D
State Environmental Quality Review
Scoping Checklist
"
.
"
..
.
14, 1~,9 (2/87)-9<
3
'5S'6S~
v LL.L..A~"
'2C~
SEQR
)
The following checklist of topics is intended
as a starting point for developing a detailed scope
for a project-specific Draft Environmental Impact
Statement. Typically. no one project will require
a discussion of all the topic areas contained in this
document. Through the scoping process, the list
of topics should be refined to reflect issues unique'
to the proposed project. Topic areas may be de-
leted, added or elaborated upon, to arrive at the
final scoping document.
The purpose of the checklist format is to iden-
tify the basic topic areas of the Draft EIS. This is
accomplished by reviewing the list and placing a
check in the box located to the left of these topics
which should be discussed. The model scoping
checklist can also be used as a worksheet,
including comments, suggestions and identifica.
tion of the particular example(s) that are relevant
to a detailed discussion of the topic or issue that
has been checked. Conversely, those topics which
are not checked, are issues not associated with the
project and may be eliminated from discussion in
the Draft EIS.
The next step is to expand the list to include
or elaborate on those topics unique to the pro-
posed project. A blank sheet is included at the end
of the checklist for such additional information.
The scoping process involves several steps in
addition to compiling a list of topics. Scoping also
includes discussions on the quantity and quality
of informaton required and the methods of obtain-
ing that data.
NOTE: This check list was designed to be
used in conjunction with the section on scoping
contained in SEQR Guideline.Draft and Final
EIS's. It is also important to emphasize that this
checklist should serve only as a model to assist in
the scoping of a Draft EIS. It should not be used
as a substitute for actively scoping Draft EIS for
a specific project. ,.
)
CD Cover Sheet
All EIS's (Draft or Final) shall begin with a
cover sheet that includes:
A. Whether it is a draft or final statement
B. Name or other descriptive title of the
project
C. Location (county and town, village or city)
of the project
D. Name and address of the lead agency
which required preparation of the state.
ment and the name and telephone number
of a person at the agency to be contacted
for further information
E. Name and address of the preparers of any
portion of the statement and a contact
name and telephone number
F. Date of acceptance of the Draft EIS
G. In the case of a Draft EIS, the deadline
date by which comments are due should
be indicated
ri'i) Table of Contents and Summary
"A'table of contents and a brief summary are re-
quired for Draft and Final EIS's.
The summary should include:
A. Brief description of the action
B. Significant, beneficial and adverse im-
pacts, (issues of controversy must be
specified)
C. Mitigation measures proposed
D. Alternatives considered
E. Matters to be decided (permits, approvals,
funding)
@ Description of the Proposed Action
Place a check in the box to the left of those
topics to be included in the draft EIS.
Er A. PROJECT PURPOSE, NEED AND
BENEFITS
1 . Background and history
2. Public need for the project, and
municipality objectives based on ad.
opted community developments plans
3. Objectives of the project sponsor
4. Benefits of the proposed action
a.) social
b.) economic
1
..
.
, '
.
IQ/ B . LOCATION
1 . Establish geographic boundaries of
the project (use of regional and local
scale maps is recommended)
2. Description of access to site
3. Description of existing zoning of
proposed site
4. Other:
1!1-t. DESIGN AND LA YOm
1. Total site area
a.) proposed impervious surface area
(roofs. parking lots, roads)
b.) amount of land to be cleared
c.) open space
2. Structures
a.) gross leaseable area (GLA), if
applicable
b.) layout of buidings (attached,
enclosed, separate)
c.) site plans and profile view
d.) material storage
e.) drainage plans
f.) above/underground pipelines
g.) staging area for material handling
3 . Parking
a.) pavement area
b.) number of spaces and layout
4.0ther:
[B-"'D. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION
1 . Construction
a.) total construction period anticipated
b.) schedule of construction
c.) future potential development, on
site or on adjoining properties
d.) other:
2. Operation
a.) type of operation
b.) schedule of operation
c.) other:
DE. CLOSURE AND POST CLOSURE PLANS
(for projects of planned limited life such as
landfills)
9" F. APPROVALS
1 . Required changes or variances to the
zoning regulations
2. Other perplit approval or funding
reguirements
@ Environmental Setting
Place a check in the box to the left of those
topics to be included in the Draft EIS.
Natural Resource
o A. GEOLOGY
.
o 1. Subsurface
a.) composition and thickness of
subsurface material
examples:
-depth to, and nature of, bedrock
formations and impermeable layers
-occurrence of an extractive
mineral resource
-usefulness as construction
material
b.) earthquake potential
~ 2. Surface
a.) List of soil types
b.) discussion of soil characteristics
examples:
-physical properties (indication
of soils hydrological (infiltration)
capabilities)
-engineering properties (soil
bearing capacity)
-agricultural properties (soil
profile characteristics) when agri.
cultural land resources are involved
c.) distribution of soil types at project
site
d.) suitability for use
examples:
-agriculture
-recreation
-construction
-mining
e.) other:
[j;}o 3. Topography
a.) description of topography at project
site
examples:
-slopes
-prominent or unique features
b.) description of topography of sur.
rounding area
[B-" B. WATER RESOURCES
.....1 . Groundwater
a.) location and description of aquifers
and recharge areas
examples:
-depth of water table
-seasonal variation
-quality
-quantity
-flow
b.) identification of present uses and
level of use of groundwater
examples:
-location of existing wells
-public/private water supply
-industrial uses
-agricultural uses
(
(
t
2
",
(
(
l
,
, '
- ------.--.-------------- ."..----.
.
.
o
2, Surface water
a,) location and decription of surface
waters located on project site or
those that may be influenced by the
project
examples:
-seasonal variation
-quantity
-classification according to New
York State Department of Health
b.) identification of uses and level of
use of all surface waters
examples:
-public/private water supply
-industrial uses
-agricultural uses
-recreational
...... c.) description of existing drainage
areas, patterns and channels
V d. discussion of potential for flooding,
siltation. erosion and eutro.
phication of water supply
o C.
o
AIR RESOURCES
I.Climate
a,) discussion of seasonal variations
and extremes
examples:
-temperature
-humidity
-precipitation
-wind
o 2. Air quality
a.) description of existing air quality
levels
examples:
-list the National and State Air
Quality Standards for the project
area and the compliance status
for each standard
b.) identification of existing sources
or pollutants.fixed or mobile
c.) identification of any sensitive
recepters in project area
examples:
-hospitals, schools, nursing
homes, parks
d.) description of existing monitoring
program (if applicable)
o D. TERRESTRAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY
~. Vegetation
a.) list vegetation types on the project
site and within the surrounding area
b,) discussion of site vegetation
characteristics
examples:
-species presence and abundance
-age
-size
-distribution
-dominance
-community types
-unique, rare and endangered
species
-value as habitat for wildlife
-productivity
o 2. Fish, Shellfish and Wildlife
a.) list of fish, shellfish and wildlife
species on the project site and
within surrounding area, including
migatory and resident species
b.) discussion of fish, shellfish and
wildlife population characteristics
examples:
-species presence and abundance
-distribution
-dominance
-unique, rare and endangered
species
-productivity
o 3. Wetlands
a.) list wetland areas within or contiguous
to the project site
b.) discuss wetland characteristics
examples:
-acreage
-vegetative cover
-classification
-benefits of wetland such as flood
and erosion control, recreation
~ E . AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
.......1.Soils
a.) list soils by name, slope and soil
group ranking within NYS Land
Classification System
(1 NYCRR 370)
b.) number of acres within each group
c.) location of site on soil survey map
o 2. Agricultural land management
system(s)
a.) inventory of existing erosion
control and drainage systems
examples:
-subsurface drain lines
-outlet/diversion ditches
-strip cropping
-diversion terraces
b.) relationship of proposed action to
existing soil and water conservation
plans (if applicable)
3
.
'. .
.
.
o 3. Associated operations
a.) number and types of farm
operations on and adjacent to site
examples:
-dairy
-grain
-orchard
b.) type and proximity of farm
related facilities
examples:
-storage units/barns
-sorting/packing houses
-refrigeration units
-roadside markets
c.) access to cropland (including
detached fields)
d.) access for farm equipment to
public roads
Human Resources
[i;I- A . TRANSPORTATION
g."J . Transportation services
a.) description of the size, capacity
and condition of services
examples:
-roads, canals, railroads, bridges
-parking facilities
-traffic control
-access/egress from site
b.) description of current level of use
of services
examples:
-a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic
flow
-vehicle mix
-source of existing traffic
~. Public transportation
a.) description of the current avail.
ability of service
b.) description of present level of use
~. Pedestrian environment
o 4.0ther:
@'"B. LAND USE AND ZONING
[il- J . Existing land use and zoning
a.) description of the existing land
use of the project site and the
surrouading area
examples:
-commercial
-residential
-agricultural
-business
-retail
-industrial
-vacant
b.) description of existing zoning of
site and surrounding area
c.) description of any affected agri.
cultural district or other farmland
retention program boundary in and
surrounding the site
~ . Land use plans
a.) description of any land use plans
or master plans which include
project site and surrounding area
b.) discussion of future development
trends or pressures
o 3. Other;
fiJ....1:. COMMUNITY SERVICE (for this section
include a list of existing facilities and a
discussion of existing levels of usage and
projected future needs)
Q..J . Educational facilities
GJ.. 2. Police protection
[1)/3. Fire protection
~ 4. Health care facilities
1M- 5. Social services
Q/6. Recreational facilities
CiV 7 . Utilities
~ 8. Public water supply
W 9. Solid waste disposal
~O.Sewage treatment facilities
o JJ.Other:
G-- D. DEMOGRAPHY
Ul---J . Population characteristics
a.) discussion of existing population
parameters
examples:
-distribution
-density
-household size and composition
b.) discussion of projections for popu.
lation growth
o 2.0ther:
GJ.--E. CULTURAL RESOURCES
G-1 . Visual resources
a.) description of the physical char.
acter of the community
examples:
-urban vs. rural
b.) description of natural areas of
significant scenic value
c.) identification of structures of
significant architectural design
~. Historic and archaeological resources
a.) location and description of historic
areas or structures listed on State
or National Register or designated
by the community, or included on
Statewide Inventory
(
(
c
4
.
.
(
b.) identification of sites having
potential sin"ificant archaeological
value include results of cultural
resource survey. if conducted
D 3.Noise
a.) identification of existing level of
noise in the community
b.) identification of major sources of
noise
examples
-airports
-major highways
-industrial/commercial facilities
D 4. Other:
@ Significant Environmental impacts
Identify those aspects of the environmental
setting in Section IV that may be adversely or
beneficially affected by the proposed action and
require discussion.
~ Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environ-
mental Impact.
Describe measures to reduce or avoid poten.
tial adverse impacts identified in Section V. The
following is a brief listing of typical measures used
for some of the major areas of impact.
Natural Resource
D A. GEOLOGY
1 . Subsurface
a.) use excavated material for land
reclamation
b.) use facility wastes (ash. sludge) for
land reclamation
c.) other:
2. Surface
a.) use topsoil stockpiled during
construction for restoration and
landscaping
b.) minimize disturbance of non-
construction sites
c.) design and implement soil erosion
control plan
d.) other:
3. Topography
a.) avoid construction on areas of steep
slope
b.) design adequate soil erosion
devices to protect areas of steep
slope
c.) other:
D B. WATER RESOURCES
1 . Groundwater
a.) design/modify system of treatment
for stormwater runoff of wastewater
prior to recharge of groundwater
b.) maintain permeable areas on the
site
(th
re1llreJ
l
5
c.) institute a program lor monitoring
water quality in adjacent wells
d.) require secondary or tertiary con-
tainment of products/wastes
e.) contingency plans for accidental
spills
f.) other:
2 . Surface water
a.) ensure use of soil erosion control
techniques during construction and
operation to avoid siltation
examples:
-hay bales
-temporary restoration of vege-
tation to disturbed areas
-landscaping
b.) design adequate stormwater
control system
c.) construct/modify sewage treatment
facilities
d.) restrict use of salt or sand for road
and parking area snow removal
e.) avoid direct discharges to surface
water resources
f.) require secondary or tertiary
containment of products/wastes
g.) contingency plans for accidental
spills
h.) other:
DC. AIR RESOURCES
1 . Air quality
a.) assure proper construction
practices
examples:
-fugitive dust control
-proper operation and mainten-
ance of construction equipment
b.) design traffic improvements to re-
duce congestion and vehicle delay
c.) install and ensure the proper
operation of emission odor control
devices
d.) initiate a program for monitoring
of air quality
eo) other:
D D. TERRESTRAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY
1 . Vegetation
a.) restrict clearing to only those areas
necessary
b.) preserve part of site as a natural
area
c.) after construction. landscape site
with naturally occurring vegetation
d.) purchase open space at another
location and dedicate to local
government or conservation
organization
.
.
. .
2. Fish. Shellfish and Wildlife
a.) provide adequate habitat (shelter
and food) for remaining wildlife
species
b.) schedule construction to avoid
sensitive periods of fish, shellfish
and wildlife cycles
c.) other:
o E. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
1.Soils
a.) select/design project to avoid
viable agricultural land
b.) reclaim disturbed agricultural soil
profiles for agricultural purposes
c.) schedule activity when crops are off
fields and soil is firm
d.) other:
2. Agricultural land management systems
a.) re-establish access drives, fence-
lines and any disturbed land
management systems
b.) re-establish any disturbed erosion
control and drainage systems
c.) install soil and water management
practices to restore or enhance
soil drainage and stability
d.) preserve open space for agricultural
use
e.) develop lease back arrangements to
allow continued agricultural use on
all or portion of site
f.) other:
Human Resources
o A . TRANSPORTATION
1 . Transportation
a.) design adequate and safe access
to project site to handle projected
traffic flow
b.) install adequate traffic control
devices
c.) optimize use of parking areas
d.) encourage car pooling and oper.
ation of facility during non-peak
traffic times
e.) design special routing and
restricted hours for delivery truck
traffic ..
f.) other:
2. Public transportation
a.) adjust public transportation routes
and schedules to service the facility
b.) encourage use of public transpor.
tation by using incentive programs
for employees or by selling tickets
in facility
c.) other:
DB. LAND USE AND ZONING
1 . Existing land use and zoning
a.) design project to comply with
existing land use plans
b.) design functional and visually
appealing facility to set standard
and precedent for future surround-
ing land use
c.) other:
Dc. COMMUNITY SERVICES
1 . Police protection
a.) minimize local police protection
responsibilities by providing private
security force
b.) provide security systems, alarms
for facility
c.) provide equipment. funds or ser.
vices directly to the community
d.) other:
2. Fire protection
a.) use construction materials that
minimize fire hazards
b.) incorporate sprinkler and alarm
systems into building design
c.) provide equipment. funds or ser.
vices directly to the community
d.) other:
3.Utilities
a.) install utility services underground
b.) incorporate water saving fixtures
into facility design
c.) incorporate energy.saving
measures into facility design
d.) other:
o D . CULTURAL RESOURCES
1 . Visual resources
a.) design exterior of structure to
physically blend with existing
surroundings
b.) minimize visual impact through
thoughtful and innovative design
of lighting and signs (consider:
height. size. intensity. glare and
hours of lighting operation)
c.) design landscaping to be visually
pleasing and to serve as a buffer
between surrounding land uses. .
parking areas. operational equip-
ment and facilities
d.) other:
2. Historic and archaeological resources
a.) Prepare a plan. including measures
to mitigate impacts to historic/
archaeological resources through
data recovery. avoidance and/or
restriction of project activities
(
(
c
6
,.'
.
(
b,) develop measures to convey cui.
tural information to the community
(e.g, through scientific/popular
reports, displays)
c,) preserve architecturally signifi-
cant structures and make an
adequate permanent photographic
and statistical record of those that
must be destroyed
d.) other:
3. Noise
a.) schedule construction/operation
to occur during "normal business"
hours minimizing noise impact
during sensitive times (early morn.
ing, night)
b.) assure adherence to construction
noise standards
c.) design berms and landscaping to
block and absorb noise
d.) other:
@ Adverse Environmental Effects that Cannot
be A voided if the Project is Implemented
Identify those adverse environmental effects
in Section V that can be expected to occur regard.
less of the mitigation measures considered in
Section VI.
@ Alternatives
This section contains categories of alterna.
tives with examples. Discussion of each alternative
should be at a level sufficient to permit a compara-
tive assessment of costs, benefits and environmen-
tal risks for each alternative. It is not acceptable
to make simple assertions that a particular alter.
native is or is not feasible. Identify those categories
of alternatives which should be included in the EIS
by placing a check in the box located to the left
of the topic.
[ll.-oA, ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND
TECHNOLOGiES
v] . Site layout
e.) density and location of structures
b.) location of access routes, parking
and utility routes
v2. Orientation
a.) compatibility with slope and
drainage p...tterns
b.) site size and set back requirements
2 . Technology
a.) pollution control equipment
b.) innovative vs. proven technologies
4. Mix of activities
a) addition of businesses which would
affect the operational nature of the
facility
.
(
l
..---,,'--.-.------..
.
~ B _ ALTERNATIVE SITES
1 . Limiting factors
a.) availability of land
b.) suitability of alternative site to
accomodate design requirements
c.) availability of utilities
d.) suitable market area
e.) compatibility with local zoning and
master plan
f.) compatibility with certified agri.
cultural districts
g.) compatibility with regional
objectives
h.) accessibility of site to transporta.
tion routes and service population
~ C . ALTERNATIVE SIZE
1 . Increase or decrease project size to
minimize possible impacts
2. Increase or decrease project size to
correspond to market and community
needs
13-1:> . ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION/
OPERATION SCHEDULING
1 . Commence construction at a different
time
2. Phase construction/operation
3. Restrict construction/operation work
schedule
g.- E. ALTERNATIVE LAND USE
1 . Suitability of site for other uses
a.) other types of commercial uses
b.) other types of industry
c.) different types of housing
d.) agricultural use
e.) other:
~. NO ACTION
1 . Impacts of no action
a,) effect on public need
b.) effect on private developers' need
c.) beneficial or adverse environmental
impacts
o G. OTHER:
@Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of
Resources
Identify those natural and human resources
listed in Section IV that will be consumed, convert.
ed or made unavailable for future use.
~ Growth Inducing Aspects (if applicable)
Describe in this section the potential growth
aspects the proposed project may have. Listed on
the next page are examples of topics that are typi.
cally affected by the growth induced by a project.
7
"
.
.
[;;V A. POPULATION
1 . Increases in business and resident
population due to the creation or
relocation of business
2 . Increases in resident population due to
the construction of housing
!;} B. SUPPORT FACILITIES
1 . business created to serve the increased
population
2. Service industries created to supply
new facility
13-' C. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
1 . Introduction or improvement of infra.
structure (roads, waste disposal, sewers,
water) to service proposed project
2. Creation of further growth potential
by construction of improved infra-
structure
D D. OTHER:
~Effects on the Use and Conservation of
Energy Resources (if applicable)
Identify the energy sources to be used,
anticipated levels of consumption and ways to
reduce energy consumption. The examples listed
below are typical issues to be considered when ad.
dressing this topic.
D A. PROPOSED ENERGY SOURCES AND
ALTERNATIVES
D B.ANTICIPATED SHORT-TERM/lONG.
TERM lEVELS OF ENERGY
CONSUMPTION
ffi" C . INDIRECT EFFECTS ON ENERGY
CONSUMPTION
1 . Increased dependence on automobile
use
2 . Increased levels of traffic due to
proposed project
IY-D. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES
1 . Design methods to reduce fuel use for
heating, cooling and lighting
a.) conventional technology
examples:
-insulation
-thermopane windows
-use of low wattage lights
b.) innovative technology
examples:
-heat pumps
-solar panels
-wind energy
-use of waste heat from an
industrial plant
-use of recycled materials
c.) efficient layout
examples:
-orientation of structures in
relation to summer and winter
sunlight
-clustering of structures to
maximize common walls
-shortening of utility runs
-shared insulation and heating
2 . Indirect energy benefits
a.) location and design of facility to
accomodate mass transit
b.) use of shuttle buses
c.) location of facility to minimize
travel distance
(
D E.OTHER:
@ Assessment of Unavailable Information
In certain situations involving major develop.
ments (such as an oil supertanker port, a liquid
propane/natural gas storage facility, a resource
recovery facility or a hazarduous waste treatment,
storage or disposal facility), information regarding
reasonably foreseeable catastrophic impacts to the
environment may not be available. Such informa-
tion may be unavailable because the means to ob-
tain it are unknown or the cost of obtaining it is
exhorbitant, or because there is uncertainty about
its validity. If such information is essential to an
agency's SEQR finding, the EIS must:
A. Identify the nature and relevance of such
unavailable or uncertain information: and
B. Provide a summary of existing credible
scientific evidence, if available: and
C. Assess the likelihood of occurrence and
consequences of the potential impact,
even if the probability is low. using the-
oretical approaches or research methods
generally accepted in the scientific
community.
This assessment should be applied only where
reasonably foreseeable catastrophic impacts to the
environment are possible and it is not intended to
be applied in the review of such actions as shop.
ping malls, residential subdivisions and commer.
cial facilities even though the size and scale of
some such projects may be extensive.
(
XIII. Appendices
Following is a list of materials typically used
in support of the EIS.
A. List of underlyino;tudies, reports and
information considered and relied on in preparing
statement
B. List all federal, state, regional, or local
agencies, organizations, consultants and private
c
8
(
.
(
l
. .
.
.
persons consulted in preparing the statement
C. Technical exhibits (if any) at a legible scale
D. Relevent correspondence regarding the
projects may be included (required in the Final
EIS)
Additional Draft EIS Scoplng Topics
Indicate any additional topics for discussion
in the Draft EIS. Attach additional sheets if
necessary.
,
9
.
.. .
......
.....--.-.....
....
.-- - .
.. -"._.-
...'.- ----.
"
"
,.
- .-....--.. .-.
'''''2.' 1211'1-'c
SEQR
117.21
App.ndi. E
St.te Envlronm.nt.l Quality Review
POSITIVE DECLARATION
Notice 01 Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS
Determination 01 Significance
Date
2 Feb BB
Project Number
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing repulations pertaining to Article
8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conserv'ation Law.
The Southold Town Board . as lead agency,
has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the
environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Stalement will be prepared.
SEQR Status: Type I 0
Unlisted C!I
Description of Action:
Change-of-Zone from Agricultural- Residential to Affordable Housing
District to allow for creation of lB single family residential lots
and construction of lB multiple dwellings in e buildings.
,.
Location: (Include street address and the name 01 the municipallly/COunt) A locahon map 01 appropllate
scale is also recommended I
see attached map
i,
,
I
p_.
---..--..
"
...q
.-....-.
.-0' ..__.
.'
".
.
SEO" N'Il'IM Declarallon
"...ona Supporting Thla D.I.""In.llon:
esee 617.6(11) lor requlremenla of tbls delermln.llon; .ee 617.6(h) lor.Condllloned Neg.llve Decl.ra~lon)
Se~ EAr Parts II and II attached.
.
II CondlllOMd Negltlve Dlcllr.tlon, provide on aUachment the specific mitigation measures Imposed.
For Furth" Information:
Conlact Person: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
AddllU: southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY
,.,.phone Number: 516/765-1801
Fo! Type I Actions .nd Conditioned NIlllllve Dlcleretlons, . Copy 01 this Notice Sant to:
Con,mlss1e>"lfr, Departmenl of Environmental Conservation, 50 Woll Road, Albany, New York 12233-0001
APP,op,llte Regional Ollice 01 the Department of Environmental Conservation
Othee of Ihe Chiel Exec~live Ollicer of the polilical subdivision In which the action will be principally
lotlled.
Applicant (I' any)
Other In,.C'l.ed agencies (if any)
,'0"
_._~,._-------_.._--
, _.
.....
.-_.....
.
, . . .
.
'~\'6-2 12-ft7)-7c
..
,
'17.21
Appendlll A
Stete Envlronm.nt.1 Qu.llty Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOAM
IEQR
"
'..rpol~: Th~ full (AI i~ dp"anpd to h~lp applocanh and aapncies dplermin~, in an ordprly mann~r. wh~th~r a project
or acloon may bp s'an,f,(lnl Thp Qu~Ulon of wh~th~r an action may be Ilanificant is not always ..sy to answer. frequent.
Iy. th~rp arp "ppch of a prolecttha, are sublpct,vp or unme"ur..bl~. It is .110 und~"tood that those who determine
siani"cancp may have Ion Ie or no formal knowledap of the environment or may be technically eopprt in environmental
analy'" In addlt,on. m.ny who have knowledae in one particular ar.. m.y not be .ware of the broader concerns affectlna
the QUPstlon ef "'an,f,(lnce .
The full EAI illntpnded to provide a method whereby applicants and aaencies can be assured that the determination
proce.. has been orderly, comprehenSIVe ,n nature, yet f1eoible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
fulllAF Compon~nts: The fulllAF is comprised of three parts:
'arl ,: Provides objective data and information about a ,iven project .nd ill site. By identifyin, basic project
d.ta, it a"ish a reviewer in the .n.lysis that likes place in Parts 2 .nd 3.
'art 2: Focuses on identifyina the ranae of possible impacts that may occur from. project or action. It provides
auidanee as to wh~ther an impact is likely to be considered sm.llto moderate or whether it is a polenti.lly'
larae impact The form ..so identifies whelher an impact can be mitiaated or reduced
'art 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identlli~rl A' !,,=,~ent:=!!...I.'II'" then !'art 3 is used to evaluate whether or nol the
impact is actually imporllnt
DETERMINATION OF SICNIFlCANCE- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Identify Ih~ 'orlionl of IAF completed for this proied: 58 Part 1 lSi Part 2 GiPart 3
Upon review of the ,nformal,on recorded on th,s EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if .ppropriate). and any other supportina
informat.on, and conlldpnna both the maaitude .nd importance of ..ch impact. it is r"lonably determined by the
lead aaenc,' that
o A The prolect w,lI not result in any larae and important imp.clls) and. lherefor~ is one which willllOt
h.ve . Slan,f,,,nt Impact on the envoronment, therefore a Mlalive tleclaration will be 'prepared.
o B Althouah thp proJect could have. siani"cant effect on the environment. there will not be a siani"canl
effect for thil Unl,ued Action because the mitia.tion m..sures delcribed in PART 3 h.ve been required,
therpforp a CONDITIONID MI.live declar.tion will be prepared.'
I! C Th~ pro,"' I may re.ult ,n one or more larap .nd important impacts that may have a siani""nt impact
on tn" fn\'lronmf'nt tht>refoft' a pOiitt"f d~cluation .-iII b~ prt'p~f..d
. A Conrtl~Jnnf'd 'f"ta~l\f Df'c1aratlon I~ on 1\' ....alld tor llnh!ottt'd Action!.
,
Chanqe-of-Zone for Southnd Vi"~~
~d"h. 01 Ac lion
,
Southold Town Board
--.---
'.In,. I'~ I t'.'I~ "~,'nc\
1"11111',1\1' .....1'...
t ' ..: " ' "~, . I ." I' . I I' I ".,~: \... 'I.
__ _Sl.lpp.rv;~t"l,..
Francis J. Murphy.
~It:n.lh"" 01 WI'''' .."...t.lt' t'n:lc ." In I..'ad "~I'fi'"
--.-------.-.---
lJ~h
--~-_._-- ---"----
-.
.':' "
..
;:...
.lIr/..~~
"
.~
II
II
---. '~'_-' --J
--
.'7'!
= .J
'e. 2.5)
~,
. ~
~ PI
::; ~
.~
. .
~- ~
.AI"
IIOAD
,
..AI"
H'
~
o
o
~
..
~
.............
:z
"
-
.
'--;art ;~P~~~'~CT I~~__;S .~~.~. ~~EI~ ~AGNITU~E .-
Responsibility 01 lead Alency
. . ..-,.'
".
.
Ceneral Information (Read Carefullyl
. In complelinl the form the reviewer should be luided by the question: Have my responses and delerminations been
reasonablel The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst
. Ident,fyinlthat an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily silnificant.
Any larle impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine silnifiunce Identifying an impact In column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
. The hamples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applICable throughout the State and
lor most situations. But. lor any specific project or site other examples andlor lower thresholds may be appropriate
lor a Potenlial large Impact response, thus ,equirinl evaluation in Part 3.
. The impacts of each project. on each site, in each loutity. will vary. Therefore. the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
. The number of examples per question does not indicate the imporlance of each question.
. In identifyinl impacts. consider long term. short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read urefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indiute the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided. check column 2. II impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example. check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitilated by chanlels) in the project to a small to moderate
impact. also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible.. This
must be explained in Part 3.
IMPACT ON LAND
1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site!
DNO IiBYES
hamples that would apply to column 2
. Any construction on slopes of 15% or Ireater. (15 foot rise per 100
foot of lenlth). or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than
3 feet.
. Construction of paved parking area for 1.000 or more vehicles.
. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within
3 leet of existing ground surface
. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more
than one phase or stage.
. huvation lor mining purposes that would remove more than 1.000
tons of natural material (i.e. ro~k or soil) per year.
. Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill
. Construction in a designated f100dway
. Olher impacts
2. Will there be an effectt.. ...,y uh,que or unusual land forms found on
the site' (i.e., cliffs. dunes. leololical formations. elC.)~NO DYES
. Specific land forms:
6
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Laroe Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes oNo
0 0 DYes oNo
0 0 DYes oNo
0 li1J li1JYes oNo
0 0 DYes oNo
0 0 DYes oNo
0 0 DYes oNo
0 0 DYes oNo
0 0 DYes oNo
.'"_.._-_.._-----~-~--
.
".
IMPACT ON WATER
3 Will propost'd action afft'ct any walt'r body dt'signatt'd as prolt'ctt'dl
(Undt'r Artlclt's 15. 24. 25 of Iht' Enyironmt'ntal Const'ryat,on law. ECl)
GiNO DYES
bamplt's that would apply 10 column 2
. Dt'Yt'lopablt' area of silt' conlains a prolt'ctt'd watt'r body.
. Drt'dging mort' than 100 cubic yards of malt'rial from channt'1 of a
prOIt'ctt'd Slrt'am
. hlt'nsion of utility distribution faci,litlt's through a prolt'CIt'd watt'r body
. Conslruclion in a dt'signalt'd freshwaler Or lidal weIland
. Olher impaclS'
4. Will proposed aclion affecl any non-prolecled exisling or new body
of waler! GiNO DVES
bamples Ihal would apply 10 column 2
. A 10% increase or decrease in lhe surface area of any body of waler
pr more Ihan a 10 acre increase or decrease,
. Conslruction of a body of water Ihat exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
. Olher impaclS:
S. Will Proposed Action affecl surface or groundwaler
qua lily or quantity' DNO jEvES
hamples Ihat would apply 10 column 2
. Propost'd Actioll will requirt' a d.schargt' pt'rmil
. Propost'd Action rt'quires use of a source of waler Ihat does not
have approyal 10 serve pr<,posed (proiecll aclion
. Proposed Aclion requlrt's walt'r supply from wells with grealer than 45
.allons per mlnule pumpong capacily
. Construction or operation causinc any contamination of a water
supply syslem
. Proposed 'ction will adyerst''' affecl .roundwaler,
. liquid effluenl will be conye"..,! off the site to facililies which prest'ntly
do not exist or hayt' inadt'qu.te capacity
. Propo.ed AClion ..ould use walt'r in excess of 20.000 gallons per
day
. Propo~ftd .Achon Will 11"('1\. (.'.U~' siltation or other dl~charge into an
eXisting body of w,;Hef It II ~ P.k((..'.t that there Will br an ob\lou~ vl~ual
contrast .0 n~tura; conditIOns
. ProlJoseo Acl,on will rt'qu". Ihe S1ora~e of pt'troleum or cht'mical
products areatt'r Ihan 1.100 gallons
,.
. Proposed Action will allow re"dt'nual ust'S In alt'as withoul waler
and./of Sftwt>r services
. Propn~ftd Action lo(atE'~. (omm('f(I,d andlm industrial USE'S \\'hlch ma\'
require new 01 f'),panSIOIl ,.,f e-.lsttrlG wa~t.. trf'atmrnt and or storag!'
fa"I,t.es
. Otht'1 Impacts___
6 Will propost'daclion altt'r dralnagt' ,:,... or paUerm. or ,urfact'
I"alpr runoftl DNO ~HS
b_ ',ples ,Inal would app:,' 10 column 2
. p" '....K'd Aclion would chanlll' ':ood ..~:er flows
-
.
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderale Large Mitigaled By
Impacl Impacl Project Change
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVe. oNo
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVe. oNo
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVt'. oNo
-
IX! 0 DYes oNo
0 lXI IX!Ves oNo
0 ~ l1!lVes oNo
!Xl 0 lXIYes oNo
~ 0 lilVes oNo
1&1 0 oVes t>>No
0 0 oVes oNo
lXI 0 oVes ONo
rn 0 DYes DNa
0 51 IilYes oNo
0 0 oYt'~ DNo
.
[- 0 C:Yt" ONo
.
iX ,..., [i'Y.s DNo
-
,-
..---..-.....
......
..- -- ..-- .,.----.., ........:-.-..... ~:_..;
a Will Propo~ed Action affect any thrutened or endanaered
,pecies' DNO !XlYES
hample. that would apply to column 2
. Ileduction of one or more ~pecie~ listed on the New York or Federal
list. usina the site. over or nur ~ite or found on the ,ite,
. Ilemov.' of any portion of a critical or 'ianificant "'ildlife habitat.
. -,pplication of pe~ticide or herbicide more than twice a yur. other
than for hricultural purpo~e~
. Other impaclS' possible
,
1 2 3 ,
Small to Potenti.I Can Impac\ Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[3 0 OYe~ oNo
ClI 0 DYes oNo
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes oNo
,
0 0 DYes oNo
.
0 0 DYes oNo
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 bYes oNo
0 0 DYes DNa
Ii) 0 DYes DNa
~ 0 DYes DNa
Ii) 0 DYes oNo
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 OYe~ DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
~ 0 O"e~ DNa
..
. Propo~ed Action may. cau~e ~ub~tantial ero~ion
. Propo~ed Action i~ incompatible with e.i~tina drainaae pattern~
. Propo~ed Action will allow development in a de~ianated f1oodway.
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AIR
7, Will proposed action affect air qUalityl IlllNO DYES
hample. that would apply to column 2
. 'ropo~ed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trip~ in any liven
hour.
. 'ropo~ed Action will 'e~ult in the incineration of more than 1 ton of
refu~e per hour.
. Eminion rate of total contaminant~ will exceed 5 Ib~. per hour or a
hut .ouree producina more than 10 million BTU'~ per hour.
. 'ropo~ed action will allow an incrur.e in the amount of land committed
to indu~trial u~e.
. Propo~ed achon will allow an increase in the density of industrial
development within e.i~tina indu~trial area~.
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
9 W,II p'opo~ed -'<lIon ~ubstan\lalll' affect non.threatened or
non.endang"red ~p~C1e~' IZNO DYE S
hample. that would apply to column 2
. p'opo~ed Aclton would ~ubotantlally ,nterfere w'lh any re~ident or
m.gratory tl~h. ~hellh~h or w.ldl,fe specre~
. Proposed -'<I,on ,eQulles Ihe ,emo,'al of male than 10 acre~
of malur. fDr.sl (oVl'r 1(111 l'I'an of agel or other localll .mporlant
,..f"~"lat,on
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL lAND RESOURCES
10 W,llthl' P,op'''''c1 -" I.on afh." aG"culturalland ,esources'
CNO tin s
lumpl.. that ...ould apply to column 2
. Th. propo>l'd allron ...ould sevt.,. (IOU or Iom.t .cceu to ag"cultural
I,nd (rnclud.~ cropland. hal.held.. putu'.. vrn.ylld. orchard. ttcl
.
",
. Construction act,vity would e,cavate or compact the soal profile of
alricultural land
. The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
of alricultural land or. ,f located in an Alricultutal D,stroc!. more
than 2.5 acres 6f alricultura' land
. The proposed actoon would disrupt or prevent installatoon of agricultural
lart! management systems Ie I. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches.
strip croPpinll. or crute a need for such measures (e.1 cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetoc r"sourc"sl DNO IiiYE5
(If n"c"sury. uS" the Visual EAf Addendum in 5"ctoon 617.21,
ApP"nd IX B l
ham pi". that would apply to column 2
. Proposed land uses. or project components obviously differ"nt from
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use pall"rns. wh"th"r
man.made or natural
. Proposed land us"s. or prol"ct compon"nts visible to us"rs of
",sthetic r"sources whICh w,lI el,m,nate or significantly r"duce their
"njoyment of the aesthetIC quailt,es of that resoure".
. Proj"ct components that will result in the elimInation or silnificant
scr"enlnl of scenIC views known to be important to th" ar"a
. Oth"r impacts
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12 Will Proposed Actoon impact any site or slructur" of historic. pr".
historoc or paleontologIcal importance' DNO IiiYES
hample. thaI would apply to column 2
. Proposed ACllon OCC urrong wholly or partially within or substantoally
contlguOU!l to an". facillt" or ~ltE' listed on thE' State or National Register
of histor'c places
. Any ,mpact to an archaeological s,te or foss,l bed located within the
prolect s,te
. Proposed Acllon \\,,11 occur .11 an area deSl~nated as sens,tive for
alChaeolo~lcal Sltrs on the NYS Stte Inventory
. Other ,mpacts possible
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13 \\',11 Propo,rd AlI,on "lIect the quant.II' or quallt\, of e>lsting or
future open spMes or rpcreallonal opportunlt,es'
hamples that \\oulr1 allpl\' to ~olumn 2 CiNO DYES
. The permanent foreclosure of a future re(Julional opportunity
. A malor reduct,on of an open .pact' important to the community.
'.0
1
I
;
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
rn 0 DYes ONo
0 0 IIDY"s ONo
1XI 0 Oy"s ONo
0 0 OY"s ONo
liJ 0 OY"s ONo
1XI 0 Oy"s ONo
lil 0 Oy"s ONo
0 0 Oy"s ONo
0 0 Oy"s ONo
0 0 :"'-Yfl; ON"
0 0 DYes oNo
~ 0 OY"s oNo
0 0 oy"s oNo
0 0 oY"s oNo
0 0 oY"s oNo
1
I
.
.-----;
, .
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
14 Will there be an effect to eXlstinl transportallon svstemsl
DNa GiVES
hamplu that would apply to column 2
. Alteration of present pallerns of movement of people and/or loods
. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems,
. Other impacU'
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15, Will proposed action affect the communitv's sources of fuel or
enerev supply! GiNO DYES
hamples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action will cause a ereater than 5% increase in the use of
any form of enerey in the municipality,
. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an enerey
~ransmi5Sion or supply system to serve more than 50 sinele or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use,
. Other impacts:
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or .vibration as a result
of the Proposed Actionl I!9NO DVES
hamples that would apply to column 2
. Blasllne within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility
. Odors will occur routonely (more than one hour per day)
. Proposed Action will produce operatrnl noise exceeding the local
ambIent noise levels for nOISe outside of structures
. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen,
. Other impacts
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safetyl
IDNO DVES
hamples that ",ould apply to column 2
. Proposec ActIon may cause a ris~ of explosion or release of hazardous
substances (I e oil, pestICIdes. chemICals. radlatoon. etc) In the event of
aCCIdent or upset condltio..s. or there may be a chronIC low level
di.char@e or emiSSIon
. Proposed ActIon may result In the burial of "hazardous wastes" In any
form (I eo tOXIC. pOI~onou~. tuShl" r("active, radioactIve, irritating.
inf ec 1I0us. elC )
. Storage faCIlItIes for on" mIllion 01 more Gallons of IIquifled natural
las or other flammable liqUIds
. Proposed act.on may result In the elcavallon or other disturbance
within 2.000 feet of a SIte used for the disposal of solrd or hazardous
waste .
. Ot!lf-r impacts:
.
..'
.
1 2 3'
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
!Xl 0 oVes oNo
IX! 0 Ii1IVes oNo
0 0 oVes oNo
"J 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVes oNo
-
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVes oNO
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVes oNO
uo 0 oVes oNO
-
~~, .--;-~_._--~....
.
.
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD
18 Will propo~~d action aff~ct th~ charact~r of th~ ~xi~tong community!
DNO liiVES
bampl~~ that would apply to column 2
. The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the
project i~ located is likely to Irow by more than 5%.
. The municipal budget for capital expenditur~s or op~rating services
wilf iftcrease by mor~ than 5% per year as a re~ult of this project.
. Propo~ed action will conflict with officially adopt~d plan~ or goals.
. Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use.
. Proposed Action will r~place or eliminate existing facilities, structures
or areas of historic importance to the community.
. Development will create a demand for additional community services
(e.l. schools, polic~ and fire, etc.)
. Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects.
. p'opo~ed Action will create or eliminate employment.
. Other impacts:
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
0 0 oVes DNa
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes DNa
[>> 0 OVes DNa
0 0 OVes DNa
lID 0 DYes DNa
liU 0 DYes ONo
I!I 0 DYes oNo
0 0 DYes DNa
; .
19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environm~ntal impactsl DNO IXIVES
If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
aelponlibility of lead Aaency
'art 3 mUlt be pr~pa'ed if one or more impact(l) il conlid~red to be potentially larae, even if the impact(l) may be
mitiaated.
Ini'ructions
D,~cuss the following for each impact identolo..d in Column 2 of Part 2:
1 Broefly de~cribe th.. impact
2 Descrobe (if applicable) how the Impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change{sl
3 Ba~ed on the informatoon available, deCide if it is reasonable 10 conclude that this impact is important.
To aniwer the question of Importance. conSider.
. The probability of the Impact occurrong
. The durallon of the l'mpact
. It~ ",eversob,lIty, Including p..rmanentlv lost re~ource~ of valu..
. Whether the Impact can 0' Will be controlled
. The regional con~equ.nce of the Impact
. It~ potential d,vergl'nce ham local n('ed, and goall
. Whether known obWCllon, to the prolect ,('late 10 thl\ impact
(Continue on attachmenll)
11
.
.
PART III
1. IMPACT ON LAND
Construction will continue for more than one year and the
impact of construction should be controlled to reduce the
noise frQm adjoining homes which are located closed to the
site.
2. IMPACT ON GROUNDWATER
The village of Greenport has not granted a contract for water
to the proposal and has indicated that it would grant
approval for a contract agreement in return for a well site
or money in lieu of. To date this has not been resolved.
If a well site is to be on site, the impact within the zone
of concentration on the quality of the recharge to
groundwater is also to be considered. An off site well
should be found in an area that is agreeable to the village.
Approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health
Services for water supply and sewage disposal must also be
obtained.
3. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
It is possible that this proposal will have an impact on
plants and animals: therefore, an inventory prepared by a
competent authority should be made.
4. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
This proposal would effectively eliminate an agricultural
land greater than 10 acres. This site was formerly an
orchard and hasn't been used as such recently, yet it was a
productive one.
5. IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
This proposal will eliminate a current vista of open land and
will have an impact on aesthetic resources. The development
will create a sharp contrast to current surrounding land use
patterns of open land.
6. IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
"
This proposal may have an impact on archaeological resources
and an assessment of the site should be made by a competent
authority.
. .
.
-'
.
.
7 . I~ACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD
This project will create a density of four times the 2-acre
requirement currently allowed on the site. It is also
changing the character of the neighborhood since there will
be multiple dwellings in an area of otherwise single-family
dwellings. This project will create an important precedent
for future projects of this type particularly under the
Affordable Housing District. The impact and availability of
large amounts of surrounding land which is farmed or vacant
may influence the owners of those sites to apply for the same
density.
B. IMPACT ON TRAFFIC
This is a significant impact with only one ingress/one egress
to the site. with 36 dwelling units proposed and 72 cars (2
each) as a result of the action, based on standard trip
generation rates published by the Institute of Traffic
Engineers, the annual average number of vehicular trips
generated per day would be 360. This is far above the
projected 271 per week as stated in the Part I. It should
also be noted that the access is proposed for Main Road (SR
25) which is a very heavily traveled road, especially during
the summer months since there are only two major east/west
roads in the Town. Future connections are indicated for
roadways, however, it is not known when or if these
properties may come in for development.
"
1
,
#
Officers
0LLage 0/ !]reenport
UTILITY OFFICE TEL.
(516) 477-1748
MAYOR
GEORGE W. HUBBARD
TRUSTEES
STEPHEN L. CLARKE
JEANNE M. COOPER
DAVID S. CORWIN
GAll F. HORTON
INCORPORATED '.:11
New INCO''''OillATION .......IL 7. I...
At_INCORPORATION UNOtR CtHUt"L LAW MAY 2., 1...
POWER PLANT TEL.
(516) 477-0172
SUPT. OF UTILITIES
JAMES I. MONS ELL
Il ""<
~l ~
~ . ...... ..... ~',
.- ~~.'
~.~'O~
. ....ON G ISLA"" .
;.... .. ,,~, """ 7:T
':' .:..-.~ -"
........... ..-
236 THIRD STREET
P.O. BOX AH
GREENPORT. SUFFOLK COUNTY
NEW YORK 11944
March 3D, 1988
David Emilita
Szepatowski Associates, Inc.
23 Naragan5ett Avenue
Jamestown, R.I. 02835
Dear Mr. Emilita.
. We haVE! been requested to respond to you concerning our' capabi lity of supplying
public water to an affordable housing project of 36 units in the Southold hamlet
area. This project is called Southold Villas.
The Village of Greenport has a Policy Statement concerning on site and off site
wells. This poliCY was adopted February 21, 1986. We have tleen offered 2 times the
upfront money which would be (36 X 2570) = $92,520 x 2 - $185.040 instead of a well.
Both the Utility Committee and the Village Board of Trustees are studying the proposal
in hopes of coming to a speedy conclusion.
We have been presented with an average daily load of 11,880 gallons per day.
This may cause a peak of 29,700 gallons. We need a site plan so we can work on
water main size, hydrant locations, and point or points of connection.
We have attached a copy of the V i II ages - Water Department Po Ii cy for your
record. We can assure you we are working on this application as fast as reasonable
to determine our capability to serve.
If I can be of further service, please contact me.
Vocy t'"75~
JIM:lkm
Ene.
cc:
James I. Monsell
Superintendent of Public Utilities
Merlon Wiggin, Peconic Associates
GeorQe Hlubbard, Mayor
Al I V II age Truste~s
Utility Committee
VVictor Lessard, fown off Southojd
alerle Scopaz, own 0 Southo d
00
>;~ ..4.
00
100 Years of Community Service
'~ ~
. . A r'<'
, .
. .
~ ~--t'-
, ,
.
Village of Greenport
Board of Trustees
Regular Meeting
February 21, 1986
A motion was made by Trustee Horton, seconded by Trustee Kapell and car-
ried to acknowledge receipt of the letter from the County of Suffolk Department
of Health Service concernIng the results of the Meadow Farms test well.
~
'-"1
.
A dIscussion was held concerning the proposed Water Department policy
for water saving devices. Trustee Kapell said he thought that it was a good;
approach. He asked if the new type of fixtures would be more expensive, and
Mrs. Cooper said they would not be. She stressed that In the State of New
York devices that did not meet strict speCifications were not allowed. If other
than those devices are sold and installed, that would be done illegally. She
added that the DEC policed those regUlations. Also, the Village had a right to
refuse hook-ups inside or outside the Village if developers did not meet those
specifIcations, which would be Included in the Village Rules & Regulations.
Trustee Lieblein said a copy should be sent to the Southold Town.
A motion was made by Trustee Cooper, seconded by Trustee Liebleln and car- .
ried to adopt a ResolutIon enabling the Water Department policy concerning
water saving devices to be adopted as Rules and Regulations of the Water
Department.
. I RESOLUTION
.
WHEREAS the VIllage of Greenport Water Department should be desIrous
of fostering as much water conservation as Is pOSSible by Its present
and future customers, and
WHEREAS many new development projects and individual constructions
are projected In the Village and in our service area franchise in tile
future, and .
WHEREAS the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
has established a list of water-saving devices, such as toilets, shower
heads, etc., and that these new devices have been projected to reduce
the average household water use by up to one-half and will reduce the
amount of waste water flowing to the sewer plant, and
WHEREAS the installation of these devices in new constructi~n will
not be prohibitorily expensive, therefore
BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
A. The Department'of Environmental Conservation's list of
water-saving devices shall be accepted by the Village
Utility Committee and that that list will be updated from
time to time. .
B. That the Village Water Department be directed to refuse to
connect newly constructed buIldings unless the superintendent
is given specifications on the plumbing fixtures that indicate
that they conform to the Village Utility Department's specifi-
cations for water-saving devices, and that an employee of the
Utility Department may make a visual inspection of said devices
before service Is installed.
C. That the Village of Greenport Building Department be directed
to Inform builders at the time of their request for a building
permit that they must install these devices.
D. That the Southold Town Building Department be asked to direct
bUilders to conform to these standards and to check with the
Village Utility Superintendent if any Questions Come up, and
that the Southold Town Building Department be supplied with
a list of approved devices.
* * * * * * * * * * *
The next motion on the agenda was discussed, Trustee Lieblein
it had been reviewed by the Uti 11 ty Committee and endor~;ed
r
U"~llage of Greenport
/' ~~ard of Trustees
Regular Meeting
February 21, 1986
Trustee Lieblien, cont.: Policy Statement had been drawn up and Trustee
Llebleln proceeded to read as follows:
#
225
.
PROPOSED POLICY STATEMENT
RE': Applications for Inclusion In Village
of Greenport Water System
POLICY STATEMENT: To distinguish applicants requesting hook-up into the Green-
port Water System who lie outside Village boundaries, and who are not minor
.subdivislons (4 or less), into two categories.
Category A - System Sustained
Category 8 Self Sustained' (definitions to follow)
PURPOSE - To create incentives for applicants requesting hook-up into Greeen-
port Water System to provide water into that system that is equal or in excess
of their projected demand.
JUSTIFICATION - Governmental bodies have historically enticed private enter-
prises into co-operatively solving shared problems.
MECHANISMS & DEFINITIONS
'-
",
A) Category A - System Sustained - Any applicant not defined by'B(I) or
B(2) and who is dependent on the Greenport Water System
to provide their water. Any applicant who provides
water capacity equal or in excess of projected demand.
B) Category B - Self Sustained mechanisms by which an applicant may
fall into Self Sustained category.
Mechanism B(I) - Onsite Program -' Applicant is able to demonstrate to
satisfaction of Village Board, under criteria set by
Superintendent of Utilities, Village Board and consulting
Engineers, for quantity and quality, on onsite capacity
to provide water that equals or exceeds projected use
of the project.
Mechanism B(2) - Transfer of Water Resource Program - Any applicant who is
not able to provide onslte prOduction, may, under this
program, develop a well, off-site, or storage fa~ility
in accordance with criteria set by Village Board, Super-
intendent of Utiliti~s, Consulting Engineering Firms as
to quantity and qualIty, which is at a location within
reasonable inclusion into the Greenport Water System
which would provide a capacity for water production
qual to or in excess to projected demand. Under the
Transfer of Water Resource Program,'the applicant would
be considered equal to those providing onsite production.
Incentives for applicants to fall into Self Sustained Category.
A) Both B(I) and B(2) described applicants would have the cost of drill-
ing the welles) and appurtances deducted from upfront money, that
deduction not to exceed the total upfront money assessed by the
Village Board. However, the purchase price,of any offsite location
will not be deducted from the "upfront money".
B) It would be permissible under this TWR Program fllr two or more
applicants to provide a common offsite well, if that well was
determined by the Village Board to have sufficient quantity and
quality to cover projected water demand of the total of the parti-
cipating applicants.
C) Applicants that fall under the Self-Sustained category would be
considered for inclusion into the Greenport Water' System separate
and aside from those falling under the System-Sustained Category.
BENEFITS:
A) Village Benefits - Applicant participation in finding and acquiring
for the Greenport Water System, well sites which should assist
7::~ge:;~r~:~~rt-
/" Board of Trustees
, Regular Meeting
February 21, 19B6
Proposed Policy Statement, cont.:
-
. -
,.~, ...~ '- "..."w.
#
.
A) Greenport in obtaining quantIty and qualIty needed to serve its
present franchise.
B) Applicant (Self.Sustained) - Since an applicant falling into the
Self-Sustained Category will be considered separate and aside from
those described as System Sustained, this may expedite hookup into
the system.
C} Applicants (System Sustained) - The hope Is that there wIll be
provided through the Self-Sustained mechanism an overall excess
which, combined with Greenport Water System's ~fforts to seek
new wells, will facilitate faster inclusion of system sustained
described applicants into the Greenport Water System.
* * * * * * *
Mayor Hubbard asked if there were any questions about the Policy State-
ment. Atty. Munzel remarked that such a POlicy Statement would only be
effective if it were made part land parcel of the Rules and Regulations of
the Village of Greenport. After a discussion Atty. Munzel said they would
have to study the rules carefully, and adopt certain Rules and Regulations.
Trustee Lieblein asked if the wordIng of the Policy Statements was improper,
and it was agreed that the;Suffolk Co. Dept. of Health should be consulted
also. After discussion, Trustee Kapell said that the Draft Policy Statement
was the sort of thing that should be discussed with ~r. McLendon of H2M.
A motion was made by Trustee Lieblein, seconded by Trustee Cooper to
have the Vi llage Board of. Trustees:',aClopt the "Proposed Policy Statement" as
reviewed that evening.
Upon a Roll Call Vote
Trustee Jeanne Cooper.
Trustee Gail Horton
Trustee David Kapell
Trustee William Lieblein
Mayor George Hubbard
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
.
Roll Call Vote Carried
A motion was made by Trustee LIebleIn, seconded by Trustee Cooper to
authorize the Superintendent of UtilitIes James Monsell to draw up the proper
regulations as encompassed in the "Proposed Polley State'!lent".
Upon a Roll Call Vote
Trustee Jeanne Cooper
Trustee Gall Horton
Trustee David Kapell
Trustee WillIam LiebleIn
Mayor George Hubbard
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Roll Call Vote Carried
~...
A discussion was held concerning the wetlands applIcation of Gnpt.
Yacht & ShipbuildIng Co., and the Board members scheduled a PublIc HearIng
for March 12, 1986 at 7:00 p.m. Harbor Master Kruszeski saId he had talked
with Mr. Clark, a~d he felt there would not be too much of a problem with what
Mr. Clark wanted to de.
A motion was made by Trustee Kapell, seconded by Trustee lleblein and car-,
ried to acknowledge receipt of the report from the Planning Board concerning
the Wetlands ApplicatIon of Gnpt. Yacht & ShIpbuilding Co. to construct bulk-
heading on property located on Carpenter Street and to schedule a public hear-
ing for said application. '
It was agreed, on the next Item, to have Atty. Munzel refer the matter to
the Planning Board for theIr review. , '
/
.
"
.
.
/
PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineering, Marine & Energy Consultants
Environmental Planning
One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672
Greenporl, New York 11944
(SI6) 477.0030
February 24, 1988
Mr. James C. McMahon - Administrator
Southold Town Community Development Agency
53095 Main Road
Southol d, L. I.
New York - 11971
Dear Jim:
Re: Southold Villas (Affordable
Housing) - Water
Met with the Greenport Utility Committee on February 22 for
an update on the status of our letter of December 16th and
Mr. Saidmehr's letter of January 28th (copies enclosed).
Because of the reported need to have an indication from the
Village of Greenport as to the expectation of water being
available in a reasonable time period, and the need for an
indication of same so as to proceed with the Scoping
Session for the change of zone, it was decided by the
Utility Commity that James Monsell, the Utilities
Superintendent, would prepare a letter to Dave Emilita, and
indicate to him that there was a positive expectation that
water would be available in an estimated six (6) weeks, and
that Southold Villas would be either first or second on the
list based on the agreement to pay double the up-front money
in accordance with present Village of Greenport policy.
The Village of Greenport is to advise Mr. Saidmehr as to
when they will negotiate the contract for the above
referenced water.
Sincerely,
PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
g~.
Merlon E. Wiggin, Ph.D. ,M.E.
President
cc: Mayor George Hubbard
Ms. Valarie Scopez
James Monsell
Isaac Saidmehr
.
,
"
,
.
.
January 28, 1988
Chairman
Village of Greenport Utility Committee
Village Hall
236 Third Street
Greenport, L. I.
New York - 11944
Re: Sou~hold Villas.
Dear Chairman:
Reference is made to your meeting of January 25. 1988 with
Merlon Wiggin of Peconic Associates in regard to the water
needs for the subject project of thirty-six (36) units.
including eighteen (18) affordable housing units.
We also appreciate your quick response to our letter of
December 16. 1987 to Mr. James Monsell, same subject (copy
attached).. .
In accordance with the discussion with the Utility
Committee. we concur that the average daily requirement
would be 11.880 gallons per day, with a peak day estimated
at 32,400 gallons. Based on experience type data we would
expect the peak hour use to occur at seven o'clock in the
morning on a Monday.
It is further understood that you suggested that a
contribution type payment be made to the Village of
Greenport for upgrading an existing well, or to the
development of an additional well. This payment would be
Five Thousand Dollars ($5.000.00) per lot. or approximately
double the standard up-front money. for a total of One
Hundred Eighty-five Thousand Dollars ($185.000.00).
Please be advised that this is acceptable to us and it is
requested that you proceed with the appropriate action so
that approval of same could be obtained.
.
,
'.
.
.
Chairman - Village of Greenport Utility Committee
January 28, 1988
Page 2
Would you please advise of your requested schedule for
payment. We would be in the position to pay the entire
amount as soon as we receive Change of Zone approval from
the Southold Town Board and Conceptional Approval from the
Southold Planning Board on this particular project. Both
are expected in the very near future.
Sincerely,
Isaac Saidmehr
. .
,-'
.
.
PECONIC ASSOCIATES. INC.
Enllin~~rinll. Marine &. l!nerllY Consultanll
hnyironlll~nlal Planninll .
One IIoulle, Alley P.O. Bux 612
G*npull.NeJl/ Yurk 11944
(S 16' 477-G030
December 16. 1987
Mr. James Monsell
Superintendent of Utilities
Village of Greenport
236 Third Street
Greenport. l. I.
New York - 11944
Re: Southold Villas
Affordable Housing Project
Dear Jim:
During the meeting and discussions with the Southold To~n
80ard on the proposed zone change for subject project,lt
was suggested that we review with the Village of Greenport
the possibility of payment of monies towards a new well or
nitrate removal of an existing well. inste~d of supplying a
well site to the Village for the proposed thirty-six (36)
unit project.
The projected water requirement for the thirty-six (36)
units is 11,880 gallons per average day.
As the decision on water is critical to this Affordable
Housing Project. would you please indicate when we could
expect an IndicatiOn as to the acceptability of this
approach and the estimated cost.
Sincerely;
PECONIC ASSOCIATES. IRC.
.
... I
/~-
Merlon E. Wiggin. Ph.D..M.E.
President
cc: Isaac Saidmehr
Pat Moore
MEW/iw
t
, '.
.
-~;
'~"2.6 12/87.-9c
SEaR
617.21
Appendix E
State Environmental Quality Review
POSITIVE DECLARATION
Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS
Determination of Significance
Project Number
Date
2 Feb 88
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing repulations pertaining to Article
8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental ConserVation Law.
The Southold Town Board . as lead agency.
has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the
environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared.
Name of Action: Southold Villas
, ,
SEaR Status: Type I 0
Unlisted IZI
Description of Action:
Change-of-Zone from Agricultural- Residential to Affordable Housing
District to allow for creation of 18 single family residential lots
and construction of 18 multiple dwellings in 8 buildings.
.
~
Location: (Include street addre.ssand the name of the municipality/county A location map of appropriate
scale is also recommended',)
see attached map
~
" t
SEaR 'Negallve Declarallon
Aeasons Supporting ThIs Determln8t1on:
(See 617.6(g) for requirements of tbls determlnallon; see 617.6(h) for,Condllloned Negallve Declarallon)
see EAF Parts II and II attached.
, ,
If Condllloned Negative Declarallon, provide on aUachment the specific mlllgallon measures imposed;
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Judith T. Terry, Tmm Clerk
Address: Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY
Telephone Number: 516/765-1801
For Type I Acllons end Condilloned Negallve Declarallons, . Copy of thIs Notice Sent to:
Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233.0001
Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conse~atlon-Stony Brook, NY
Office of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision In which the action will be principally
located.
Applicant (if any)
I. Other involved agencies (if any),
Southold Town Building Department
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
Patricia C. Moore, Esq; for SQuthold.Villas, .I nc.
Suffolk County Department of Planning
Suffolk County Department of Health Services'
~:i
.
.
.
,
,
101,1&.2 (21\7)-7c
,.
117 .21
Appendix A
Stete Environmental auellty Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
SEaR
.'
Purpost: The full EM " de>tgned to help applicang and agencie, determme. in an orderly manner. whether a project
or action mal' be Significant The Question of whether an action may be Significant " not alway, easy to answer frequent.
Iv. the,e are a'pects of a prolect that are sub,ectIVe or unmeasureable. It is al,o understood that those who determine
signifICance may have little. or no formal kno\4.ledgr of the environment or may be technical Iv expert in environmental
analvslS In addition. manv who have knowledge in one parlicular area mal' not be aware of the broader concern' affecting
the question af .signlflcance
The full EAF i, intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
proce" ha, been orderly. comprehenSive m nature. yet fleXible to allow introduction of information to fit a prolect or actIon
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objectIVe data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data. it as,ists a reviewer in the analvSls that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action It provides
guidance as to whether an impact IS likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially.
large impact The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced
Part 3: If anI' impact in Part 2 is identlfipn .. !,"'!e~!:"::.,.loo"". then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact IS actually Important
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Identify tht Portions of EAF compltted for this projtct: IiO Part 1 51 Part 2 OlPart 3
Upon review of the mformatlon recorded on thiS EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and anI' other supportIng
information, and conSldeflng both the magitude and Importance of each Impact. it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that
o A The prolect Will IIOt result in any large and important impaclls) and. there(ort;. is one which will not
havt a Sign I' lcan~ Impact on the enVIronment, .therefore . nel.ti\'e declAration will be "prepared.
o B Although the proJect could have a SIgnificant effect on the environment. there will not be a significant
eftect for thIS Unlisted Action because the mitigat.on measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED ntsati.t dtelaration will bt prepared,-
!X C Tnt: pro!t'ct ma\o re~ult In onE' or morE' largE' and important impacts that may have a ~ignlflCant impact
on tht. f'nVlfonmf'nt. tht'r{>fo~t' ~ pos.ifi\le decl~r~tion "ill be prepireod.
. A (onrll:lonf'C '*"ga!I\t- DPe lMatlon Ie., only \alla lor lInll!-tf'd Action!>
Change-of-Zone for Southold Villas
'C1r.h 01 A( tlun
Southold Town Board
'.H~,' ,,' I C.I,I ,\';,'[1(\
I " III t I d 1 \:' ~,.,'.,
, . ~:.. '
I "1" . I I' I" .' . ~ \....
;}1ti t):~~j.~~1;I(i;7\ /jj: 1)
~.~n.ltllr(' 0' Pft'~lf.!.: III d,llt'rt'nt Iwm rt"~pnne.,lblt> oiflCfr.i
Francis J, Murphy
---- - .- ------- _..--
~.~nJtlll'. 01 10<."1 oIl'ltd,- I )::t( l'f In It'iln ~~,'1"- \
---*-- .._- --.
(J,,:,
1
.
.:
.
.
.
,
."", ~:
(;}
9\7' !
.<, _. . -''"'~'1-...-
~
~
:e.25)
~\
,-,,~........._,_........,.,.
II
II
I
\
,i:
i. ~
. ,
.. '"
~ rr1
:;; ~
N,I Ilt. 21)
~
"'AIN
H'
_AI"
" OAO
~
o
n
~
..-
~
z
"
-
.
---, .
,.......-
:~;':'s.-'-~
. .1:-'
..,.....~~~'__J-
-------.
~..-~J
.
Part 2-PROJ. IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNeDE
Responsibility of Lead Agency
.
General Information (Read Carefully)
. In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
reasonable! The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
. Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
. The hamples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large Impact response. thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
. The impacts of each project. on each site. in each locality. will vary. Therefore. the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
. In identifying impacts. consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change{s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This
must be explained in Part 3.
IMPACT ON LAND
1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?
DNa [jiIYES
hamples that would apply to column 2
. Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than
3 feet.
. Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles.
. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within
3 feet of existing ground surf ace.
. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more
than one phase or stage.
. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year.
. Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill.
. Construction in a designated floodway.
. Other impacts
2. Will there be an. effect t,. ...IY un,que or unusual land forms found on
the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations. etc.)IZiNO DYES
. Specific land forms:
6
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
0 0 DYes ONo
0 0 DYes ONo
[l 0 DYes ONo
0 0 DYes ONo
0 121 121 Yes ONo
0 0 DYes ONo
0 0 DYes ONo
0 0 DYes ONo
0 0 DYes ONo
'.
0 0 DYes ONo
.
",
IMPACT ON WATER
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected I
(Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
I3lNO DYES
hamples that would apply to column 2
. Developable area of site contains a protected water body,
. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a
protected stream,
. Extension of utility distribution faci,litiesthrough a protected water body
. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland.
. Other impacts:
4. Will proposed action affect any non, protected existing or new body
of water? 131 NO DYES
hamples that would apply to column 2
. A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water
pr more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
. Other impacts:
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity' DNa ~YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Actio" will require a discharge permit.
. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not
have approval to serve pr0posed (project) action.
. Proposed Action reqUlr.., water supply from wells with greater than 45
gallons per minute pumping capacity
. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water
supply system,
. Proposed ~ction will advetse" affect groundwater.
. Liquid effluent will be convev,'l! off the site to facilities which presently
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
. Propo,ed Action ....ould use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per
day,
. Proposed .A.ction will Iikf'lv C.U!", siltation or other discharge into an
existing body of watt'f tc. (l ~ pxlc-",( that there will be an ob'vious visual
contrast ~o ntlturai conditions.
. ProlJosed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water
and/or sewer services.
. Proposed Action locate~ conlmNr:lal and/or industnal uses \\.'hich may
require new or expansIon t)f existing waste treatment and. or storage
facilitIes
. Other Impacts'___
6 Will proposed action altt"r dramage 1:(IW or patterns, or <:,urface
water runoffl UNO StY[ S
[." "ples lnat would apply:to column !.
. pf( ~,r'jcd Action would changt' f:ood ~d:er tlows
7
.
.
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
I.
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
IX! 0 DYes DNo
0 [XI IXlYes DNo
0 0 [lg Yes DNo
!Zl 0 iZ]Yes DNo
~ 0 IXlYes DNo
!Zl 0 DYes WNo
0 0 DYes DNo
[XI 0 DYes DNo
rn 0 DYes DNa
0 ua IXl Yes DNo
0 0 DYes oNo
[= 0 "Ye, DNo
"
i
~ i n []i'Yes eNo
. .
.
. Proposed Action may" cause substantial erosion.
o Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns
o Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway.
. 0 Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality! (1gNO DYES
hamples that would apply to column 2
o Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given
hour.
o Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of
refuse per hour.
o Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed Sibs. per hour or a
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
o Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed
to industrial use.
o Proposed achon will allow an increase in the density of industrial
development within existing industrial areas.
o Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? DNO (j(JYES
hamples that would apply to column 2
o Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal
list. using the site. over or near site or found on the site.
o Remov.. of any portion of a critical or significant IYildlife habitat.
o Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other
than for ~gricultural purposes.
. Other impacts: Possible
9 Will Proposed Action substanllally affect non.threatened or
non'endangered species' (j(JNO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action would substantially Interfere with any resident or
mlcratory flsh, shell! Ish or wild Ide speCIes
. Proposed Action requlr(>s the removal of more than 10 acres
- of mature (.orest (over 100 Yl'ars of. agel or other locally Important
vegetation
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL lAND RESOURCES
B
.
1 2 3 '
Small to Potentii'1 Can Impac\ Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
Ql 0 DYes DNa
rn 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNa
,
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 -DYes DNo
lXI 0 DYes DNa
Il9 0 DYes DNa
lXI 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
[X: 0 DYes DNa
.
",
· Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of
agricultural land.
. The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres cif agricultural land.
. The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural
la"~ management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? DNa [jiVES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed land uses, or prolect components obviously different from
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetiC qualities of that resource.
. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area
. Other impacts
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12 Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
histOriC or paleontological importance? DNa [jiYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places
. Any Impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed -located within the
proJect Site.
. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory
. Other impacts possible
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
, 3 \\'111 Propo~l'd Action .lttect tne "quantl{V or Qua~lt\' of e).i~ting or
tuture open spdces or recreational opportunltles1
hamplcs that "auld apply to column 2 CXNO .oYES
. ThE' permanent toreclo')ure ot 'a future recreational opportunity
. A malor reductIon at ,an open space Important to the community.
. Other Impacts
9
.
,
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
0 0 DVes DNa
0 rn ~Ves DNa
[X] 0 DVes DNa
0 0 DVes DNa
.
5a 0 DVes DNa
.
[X] 0 DVes DNa
iii 0 DVes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
.
0 0 DVes DNa
0 0 :""':Yes DNCl
0 0 DVes DNa
[ZI 0 DVes DNa
. .
0 0 DVes DNa
0 0 DVes DNa
0 0 DVes DNa
"
.
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
14, Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems?
DNa GiVES
hamples that would apply to column 2
. Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods,
. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems.
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply? I5iNO DVES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of
any form of energy in the municipality.
. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy
~ransmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
. Other impacts:
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or ,vibration as a result
of the Proposed Action? 89NO DVES
hamples that would apply to column 2
. Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility.
. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day).
. Proposed Action will produce operating noISe exceeding the local
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
. Proposed Action will rerJ:love natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
~NO
DVES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action may cause a risk of explOSion or release of hazardous
substances (i e. oil, pestiCides, chemicals, radiatIOn, etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge or emission.
. Proposed Action may r€'sult in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any
form (ie. tOXIC, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc )
. Storage facilities for ont' mdl.lon or more gallons of liquified natural'
gas or other flammable liqUids
. Proposed actIOn may result in the excavation or other disturbance
within 2,000 feet of a \lte used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste
. OthPr impacts'
10
.
....
1 2 3'
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
@ 0 DVes DNa
fXJ 0 fXJVes DNa
0 0 DVes DNa
"] 0 DVes DNa
0 0 DVes DNa
0 0 DVes DNa
0 0 DVes DNa
0 0 DVes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DVes DNa
0 0 DVes DNa
0 0 DVes DNa
0 0 DVes DNa
0 0 DVes DNa
.. "
0 0 DVes DNO
0 0 DVes DNa
.
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD
18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community!
DNO 5i!YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
o The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
o The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services
wM increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project.
o Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals.
o Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use.
. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures
or areas of historic importance to the community.
o Development will create a demand for additional community services
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
o Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects.
o PJoposed Action will create or eliminate employment:
o Other impacts:
.
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
5a 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
1ZJ 0 DYes DNa
!Xl 0 DYes DNa
Il9 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts? DNO I]lYES
If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large. even if the impaet(s) may be
mitigated.
Instructions
DISCUSS the follOWing for each impact identilled in Column 2 of Part 2:
1 Briefly describe the impact
2 Deswbe (if applicable) how the Impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project changers).
3 Based on the information avarlable. deCide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance.' consider:
o The probabrllty of the Impact occurnng
. The duration of the Impact
. Its irreversibilIty, including permanently lost resources of value
o Whether the Impact can or wrll be controlled
. The regional consequence" of th~ Impact
o Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
. VVheth,er known objectIons to the (HOlect relate to this impact
(Continue on attachments)
11
. ,
.
.
PART III
1. IMPACT ON LAND
Construction will continue for more than one year and the
impact of construction should be controlled to reduce the
noise from adjoining homes which are located closed to the
site.
2. IMPACT ON GROUNDWATER
The Village of Greenport has not granted a contract for water
to the proposal and has indicated that it would grant
approval for a contract agreement in return for a well site
or money in lieu of. To date this has not been resolved.
If a well site is to be on site, the impact within the zone
of concentration on the quality of the recharge to
groundwater is also to be considered. An off site well
should be found in an area that is agreeable to the Village.
Approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health
Services for water supply and sewage disposal must also be
obtained.
3. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
It is possible that this proposal will have an impact on
plants and animals; therefore, an inventory prepared by a
competent authority should be made.
4. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
This proposal would effectively eliminate an agricultural
land greater than 10 acres. This site was formerly an
orchard and hasn't been used as such recently, yet it was a
productive one.
5. IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
This proposal will eliminate a current vista of open land and
will have an impact on aesthetic resources. The development
will create a sharp contrast to curr~nt 'surrounding land use
patterns of open land.
6.
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
This proposal may have an impact on archaeological resources
and an assessment of the site should be made by a competent
authority.
.
.
7. IM?ACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD
This project will create a density of four times the 2-acre
requirement currently allowed on the site. It is also
changing the character of the neighborhood since there will
be multiple dwellings in an area of otherwise single-family
dwellings. This project will create an important precedent
for future projects of this type particularly under the
Affordable Housing District. The impact and availability of
large amounts of surrounding land which is farmed or vacant
may influence the owners of those sites to apply for the same
density.
8. IMPACT ON TRAFFIC
This is a significant impact with only one ingress/one egress
to the site. With 36 dwelling units proposed and 72 cars (2
each) as a result of the action, based on standard trip
generation rates published by the Institute of Traffic
Engineers, the annual average number of vehicular trips
generated per day would be 360. This is far above the
projected 271 per week as stated in the Part I. It should
also be noted that the access is proposed for Main Road (SR
25) which is a very heavily traveled road, especially during
the summer months since there are only two major east/west
roads in the Town. Future connections are indicated for
roadways, however, it is not known when or if these
properties may come in for development.
.
.
.
p
D
Southold. N. Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
January 26, 1988
Mrs. Judith T. Terry
Town Clerk
Town Hall
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Southold Villas
SCTM # 1000-70-1-6
Dear Mrs. Terry:
The following :action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board,
Monday, January 25, 1988.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Baord recommend to the Town
Board that the change of zone petition for Southold Villas from "A"
Residential - Agricultural District to "ARD" Affordable Housing District
be approved. This proposal is located on the west side of State Route
25 in Southold.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office.
Very truly yours,
~R O>-.JJSUJ~lU\~
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.. CHAIRMAN ~ d YL::,
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR 01; VITAL STATISTICS
.
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
January 20, 1988
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Gent lemen:
Transmitted herewith is a new change of zone petition from Southold
Villas, Inc. for "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "AHD" Affordable
Housing District on their property on the west side of Main (Route 25) Road,
Southold. The applicant has withdrawn their prior two' petitions for change
from "A" to "M" and "A" to "AHD" on this same parcel.
Please prepare an official report defining the conditions described in
said petition and determine the area so affected by your recommendations,
and transmit the same to me. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Attachments
:~ECEl'j::D
.
.
,
"
Jr\P
.,~'q
-~ ':".::""
cff~ LMUi' gg~e","
....TTORNEYS....TLAW
2cotnolc4 "f,~W1"l ~.!,,'ik
MAIN ROAD - P.O. BOX 1466
SDUTHOLD, NEWYORK 11971
LEFFERTS P. EDSON
RUDOLPH H. BRUER
(516) 765-1222
(516) 765-2500
PATRICIA C. MOORE
January 6, 1988
Southold Town Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Re: Southold Villas, Inc.
Dear Sirs:
By way of clarification, and at the suggestion of Southold Town
Attorney, James A. Schondebare, Esq., we hereby amend our letter to
you of December 28, 1987, to reflect a withdrawal of our previous
petition for a change of zone to "M"-Multiple Residential District
(50% of property) and a change of zone to "AHD"-Affordable Housing
District (50% of property). Our client's revised formal withdrawal
~{ letter is enclosed as well.
The change of zone petition submitted with our letter of December 28,
1987 represents our client's request for a change of zone to "AHD" on
the entire property.
Very truly yours,
.---;
./ _/ . . .~' -;f/'
v,;>'~.'bk';:'-":'d C . //(/-,,7'-7../'--'
patricia C. Moore
PCM!df
Ene.
.
.
"
..
TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:
Southold Villas Inc., by their attorney patricia C. Moore, hereby
withdraws its 11/23/87 Petition for change of zone from
"A"-Residential to "M"-Multiple Residential District (50% of property)
and from "A"-Residential to "AHD"-Affordable Housing District (50% of
property) .
We respectfully request that the $500.00 fee be credited to Southold
Villas Inc. and applied toward SEQRA review.
,
.,;'T' , /' -;J..~J,,~
, ,:,,'.{/J~-,~<...<.. ,C{ "-- - //(,,'/t-,.
patricia C. Moore
.
cf~ ~ fJdJ<ael'
.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MAIN ROAD' P,O. BOX 1466
SDUTHOLO. NEW YORK 11971
LEFFERTS P. EOSQ N
RUDOLPH H. BRUER
(SID) 765-1222
(516)765-2500
PATRICIA C. MOORE
December 28, 1987
.l.ECEi\lED
Southold Town Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, N.Y. 11971
""t- -"\ .', '~ .,-:".....
...;::.t,; .~:";J .:;''jl
SOHth,.,I"& T nwn \ -!2rK
Re: Southold Villas, Inc.
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed please find change of zone application from "A "-Residential
to "AHD"-Affordable Housing District. In accordance with the AHD
legislation, 50% of the property designated as single family,
unimproved lots will be sold at the Southold Town "affordable" maximum
sales price and the remaining 50% consisting of the multiple units
will be sold at market value.
Also enclosed is our client's formal withdrawal of application for
change of zone to "M"-Multiple Residential District.
very/tr..l.lly yours,
. /
//./7:" /"'/''';,,:/'
. ..~ ///-:'0.-
/ /~>.i.?:--t/:: ~.;. /-
K_____. .
Patricia C. Moore
PC!1/df
Encs.
.
.
TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:
Southold Villas Inc., by their attorney Patricia C. Moore, hereby
withdraws its Petition for change of zone from "A"-Residential to
"M"-Multiple Residential District.
We respectfully request that the $500.00 fee be credited to Southold
Villas Inc. and applied toward SEQRA
review.
kiiZ //7b-
Patricia C./Moore
.
,
.
~~~ /J8~
.
ATTORNEYSATt..AW
MAIN ROAD. P.O. BOX 1466
SOUTHOLO,NEWYORK 1197'
LEf"F"ERTS P. EDSON
RUDOLPH H. BRUER
(516)765-1222
(5161765-2500
PATRICIA C. MOORE
December 28, 1987
.~
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Att: Diane Schultze, Administrative Asst.
Re: Southold Villas
Dear Diane:
In confirmation of my conversation with you on this date, you advised
me that Valerie Scopaz, Southold Town Planner, discussed Southold
Villas Inc. with the Planning Board on December 18, 1987, at the
Planning Board work session. Ms. Scopaz asked the Board whether they
recommend that Southold Villas Inc. submit a plan showing the multiple
units along the east of the property, rather than as is presently
submitted. I was advised that the Board wishes to wait until the
Southold Town Board approves the zone change before they consider any
further changes to the plan.
In light of the above, Southold Villas Inc. will submit an AHD zone
change petition with the previously proposed plan.
Very truly yours,
"Patricia C. Moore
Pcr1/df
cc: Southold Town Board./
Merle Higgins
Isaac Saidmehr
.
.
i.
. .?? K3
CASE NO. ......... ..............
STATE CF NEW YORK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
IN THE !IT ,\ TTSP OF 'rl.fl" PE'T'TTTnN ('\1"
FOR A CHANGE, MODIFICATION OR AJlIENmIEN1' OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDL"!-
ANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK.
RECEIVED
DEe 29 1987
.
Southold Town Cleric
PETITION
.............................................................................
..
TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD;
SOUTHOLD VILLAS, INC.
by:Patricfa C. Moore, Esq.
1. I,.... ................................................................
(insert name of petitioner)
Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the owner of certain real property situated at
Crow's Nest Court,
Manhasset, NY 11030
r residing at ................... ....................... ...............
............?:?:!.t!J..o..~.~.!....~.:..~:................ and more particularly bounded and described as follows;
See description marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto and sketch plan
2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Towll of South old to change, modify and
amend thE: Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York,
Including the Building Zone Maps heretofore made n part thereof, as follows;
Change of Zone of property from "A"-Residential / Agricultural to
"AHD" Affordable Housing District.
.
.
.
,
t
3. Such request is made for the following reasons:
To permit development of subject property to Affordable Housing
District.
This application is made with the intent to provide affordable living
for Southold residents.
,-
(L. S.) ........ !I/.. .. ............ "" '" .. , .
patricia C. Moore, Atty Lor
Petitioner
STATE OF NEW YORK, )
) SS:-
COUXTY OF SUFFOLK, )
PATRICIA C. MOORE
.... ~'tt~~;;~y" f~'~"""""':"""""'"
s he is ,.the petItIoner in the within action; that
, BEI:':G DULY SWOR"', deposes and says that
he has read the foregoing Petition and knows
the contents thereof; that the same is true to His (her) own knowledge, except as to the matters
therein stated to be alleged all informatic:1 and Le lief, and that as to those matters she believes it
to be true.
(L. S.) ....../,1'1..........................
Sworn to before me
this ;:-?~~ay of . ..I?\"~~!l\q\".r:........., 19. .~?
~/
...................':.../......................
Notary Pllblic.
MAllY DlAIM PlIIIII
IIDrARY PUBLIC, STATE Of NEW 1IIIIl
MI. 52-4655242 ~UFFOLK COUNIY
CIlIiMISS/ON 1 ;C" 'O'l<T 31,1989
'"
.:t:
~';
.':;,
.
,
.
-
, (
.
.
"
EXHIBIT "A"
Description of Property
ALL that certain tract Or parcel of land situate in the Village
and Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York,
bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a granite monument on the wes~ly line of Main
Street and the southeasterly corner of land of ,franc is M.
Gagen; running thence along said westerly line'of Main Street,
South 130 00' West 100.0 feet to a concrete monument and land
of Marguerite H. Young; thence along said land;pf Marguerite
H. Young, two courses, as follows: ' I,
1. North 770 00' West 120.0 feet to a concrete monument;
thence;'
2. South 210 56' West 126.42 feet to a concrete monument
and land of Baker; thence along said land of Baker and land
of George H. Smith Estate, North 810 12' 20" West 540.46
feet to a granite monument and land of Frank Bly Estate;
thence along said land of Frank Bly Estate, two courses,
as follows:
1. North 120 50' 10" East 28.0 feet to a granite monument;
thence
2. North 760 43' 10" West 895.92 feet to a stone and post
and land of Diller Brothers' thence along said land of Diller
Brothers, North 310 I' 60" East 709.83 feet to a granite
monument and land of Arthur B. Gordon; thence along said land
of Arthur B. Gordon, South 420 49' 50" East 384.77 feet to a
concrete monument; thence southeasterly and then easterly
along other land of Jonathan H. Terry 774.6 feet, more or
less, to the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of
Helen Virginia Cleveland; thence along said land now Or for-
merly of Helen Virginia Cleveland, South 650 51' 20" East,
127.2 feet to a concrete monument on the southwesterly corner
of said land of Francis M. Gagen; thence along said land of
Francis M. Gagen, South 600 56' East 182.68 feet to the point
or place of beginning.
Together with all right, title and interest of the party of
the first part in and to Main Street in front of and adjoining
said premises.
ALSO, ALL that tract or parcel of land situate in the Village
and Town of Southold, County of SUffolk and State of New York,
bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the south-
westerly corner of land now or formerly of Helen Virginia
Cleveland and running thence westerly and then northwesterly
~
.
~
.
.
, \
~
along other land of Jonathan H. Terry above described 774.5
feet, more or less, to a concrete monument and land of Arthur
B. Gordon; thence along said land of Arthur B. Gordon, three
courses, as follows:
1. North 300 37' East 150.07 feet to a concrete monument; thence
2. South 720 46' 10. East 474.11 feet to a concrete
monument; thence
3. South 730 12' East 238.03 feet to a con~ete monument
and land of Rose M. Smith; thence along said land of Rose
M. Smith and said land now or formerly of Helen,virginia
Cleveland, South 170 20' 40. West 260.2 feet to the point
of beginning.
-2-
,
.
.
/ .. '
Application for change of zone of 9.01 acres
from "A" Residential/Agricultural to
"AHD" Affordable Housing District
Date: December 28, 1987
Owner: Southold Villas Inc.
Isaac Saidmehr
97 Crow's Nest Court
Manhasset, N.Y. 11030
Agents:
Engineer: Merl Wiggins
peconic Associates
1 Bootleg Alley
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Attorney: patricia C. Moore, Esq.
Edson & Bruer, Esqs.
Main Road, P.O. Box 1466
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Location: W/s Main Road (S.R. #25), Southold, N.Y.
North by Mann;
South by Flower Hill Building Corp.;
West by Baitz;
East by Main Road & ors.
SCTM# 1000-070-01-006
NATURE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
Petitioners have proposed the creation of 18 quarter acre unimproved
lots on 9.01 acres which will be sold to qualified recipients of the
Affordable Housing Legislation. The calculations for the number of
Affordable Housing lots, as well as the multiple single family units,
were based on 1/2 acre yield, then clustered into quarter acre lots to
maximize the acreage of open space.
The Petitioner intends to sell all 18 lots for the maximum sales price
of twenty-five thousand ($25,000.00) dollars per lot. Each lot owner,
within this Affordable Housing subdivision, will be encouraged to
build a home that will accommodate individual needs while maintaining
the integrity of the community.
The remaining 9.01 acres will contain two and three bedroom multiple
single family units which will provide an alternative housing style to
those individuals who do not qualify for Affordable Housing or for
senior citizen complexes.
-
.
.
The Petitioner intends to maintain a separate and distinct boundary
between the single family lots to be sold pursuant to the Affordable
Housing schedule and the multiple dwelling units. In accordance with
the AHD legislation, Petitioner will sell no more than 50% of land at
market value.
How this Affordable Housing Project
will be designed to fulfill the
purposes of this Article:
The purpose of the Affordable Housing Legislation is to provide higher
density housing for families of moderate income, preferably families
employed or residing in the Town of Southold.
Town Master Plan:
The proposed petition is in conformity with the Southold Town Master
Plan. The Master Plan proposed the Hamlet Density Residential
District which would provide for a mix of housing types and level of
residential density found appropriate to areas in and around the major
hamlet centers. Similarly, the Affordable Housing District is
intended for land within 1/2 mile of the Hamlet of Southold.
Site Analysis:
The site of the proposed Affordable Housing project is ideal for the
intended project. The property is a total of 18.021 acres with
one-half of the property designated for Affordable Housing. The
layout of the project will include treed and landscaped streets, two
areas of open space, which can be improved and dedicated to the Town
or left in its natural state, and the design of the project is
intended to create a quiet setting for Southold residents. The
property will result in a minimum burden on governmental facilities
because the property is within walking distance to Southold schools,
churches, post office, local businesses and public transportation.
The likely candidates for affordable housing are young families or
retired persons on fixed incomes who are often dependent on
transportation. The Affordable Housing recipients will be
conveniently located within walking distance to the town, relying less
on their vehicles and, consequently, reducing traffic at the site.
Safety of Street System:
The street layout of the proposed project was created with input from
the Southold Town Planner. The design of the streets within the
proposed project have been carefully designed to maximize safety while
maintaining traffic flow. The streets within the proposed project
make use of cul-de-sacs and connecting streets. The proposed streets
will eventually connect to land now or formerly of Hemblo and land now
or formerly of Flower Hill Building Corp. The roads will be improved
to Town standards and dedicated to Southold Town.
..
.
.
.
Street drainage:
In order to maximize the open space, water runoff will be collected
and disposed of by underground leaching basins. Leaching basins will
make better use of the open space, as well as prevent an eyesore to
the community.
Character of area:
The proposed residential development will conform to the character of
established developments in Southold Town by the use of landscaping,
plantings and covenants and restrictions. The creation of single
family unimproved lots will give the owners the opportunity to build
their own homes of varying styles. Owners will take pride in owning
their own homes which will be built to meet their individual needs.
Covenants and restrictions can be imposed, if desired by the Town,
which can impose architectural controls on the design and aesthetic
quality of the community.
Utilities:
The proposed lots will be serviced by Greenport Utility Company and
individual septic systems. In order to meet the needs of Greenport
Utility Company, the Petitioner will donate a well of appropriate
quality and quantity to the Village of Greenport, or provide money in
lieu of a well which will allow the Village of Greenport to apply such
funds to the improvement of existing systems.
Conclusion:
In a concerted effort to keep the young families in Southold Town, the
Town Board instituted Affordable Housing legislation. The Petitioner
has responded to the need by sUbmitting this Affordable Housing
project. We respectfully request that the Southold Town Board and the
Southold Town Planning Board approve the proposed petition.
.
. . ..\011.1)
.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART I
PRo.n::CT INFORMATION
- "
)tQr:c~: ThIS 'lOewr.eac I, ."'9ae4 ~ ush~ ta au",,"al'g "".elI.r ~~. ICclon propoS" 'IIy ~I," ~ ,19"{flelac
.ff,e: ~a CIII .avirea....c. 'l.ul QIIIIIItI ;.~. ,aclA ~c.l S,,"c. .1ll_":O t.~.,. 'llllsctaa, .101 :ae e:)asla.red
IS ~Irt af ~" Illp.leu,aa far Iparovll 1lIe1 ..y ~. '''Joe: tG fIIrt/1l1' v.rtflClclan 1IIc1 _"c ,..,,1... 'ravl.
..y laal.'I1l!"1 l"..fa.....,Qft 1011 iNlll.v. ..HI lie __ :II _I.ea 'Mn a - ~. "" ,," .
:: is uaec:e4 l:IIl. =_I_claa of tII. EAP ..Ill lie elep....nc ~ lafo...lan curren.ly 1.11IIDI. la" ".lIt noC
'avo", .'" selIG'''' rlll.reo, or 'avllcl,nlan. It Im,..c,.. ~I"'", 1_ _1;10lIl1 _k 1,,_vI~I.
10 taellelCl lIlel slIKlfy ..en Inluae.. .... .
;af.1E .,)F "IIOJEC' ~
~ lItO .\QCAESS ~, OWHEA I [f D1"'.,..,,,:)
.'
SOUTHOLD VILLAS
SOUTHOLD. NEW YORK - 11971
ISAAC SAlPMEHR . .
c:-e. .
. ~~Vws NJ:,T rnllRT
,'. "00
.I001l[3i J.:.IO .'IAl~E nF ':lOU':,'"T:
PECDNIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
(;....:
MANHASSET "
(,J.~.;
NEW YORK
'Ulcel
11020
l~~p)
ONE BOOTLEG ALLEY
(~'n.c;
MIlWS PMG/li: .(516) 621-2088
GREENPORT. L. I.. NEW YORK
'~.~.i i~,","1
11944
'Io.p,
"~E~,~l.r!~~ ~F ..IJJC:~7: (Sri,f1y Qasertlle C~. of project Ir ac:lanl REZONING OF 18.02 ACRES FROM
RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING DISTRICT. SEE ATTACHED SITE PLAN.
(~S;; CllIlPI.m EACH Q!U,.o., . llICIlcaea Il.A. If lID. ...IICHI.)
.. 517, :ES~alPrIO~
(Physlcol ,.c:,a1 af av.nll project. lIoell ....IGlIe ..... .......1... lnasl
1. ......r.. c:.,.racur.f Co" l..eI: r.en.r.I1, IIIIlf.re II.,..L. ;.e",I1, ....v... 1M ...\11", ~r '"",,,llr
:. ~"'''nc 'and ...: UrIloa . la'''I<I'1..' \.'-rei.J1 'uS-.roln _, llurol"_, F'~1:
_, AgrlculCu" _' I]tlI.r VAl-ANI -rtlRl'IERLY AliRI1AJLT RAL. . .
J. raClI oenaq. .of ~roJIC1: ''''1:18.021_.
.\ptIro.ilOlCI oeMa,.: 1"""'CI, Artar ,-I.c,... i'reMncl, AfUr ,=-I.clan
."aelew or 1rula Ila. _teres -"...
~O"S ;.~ _,au _'e:"ts
~~C::.Ii~:.lrsl 18.02acrsl 1 ~'C~.I
-
~f.-;Ilnc {:~sn..u~ or
1"'ali Ii ;.r ~r'";1:;ts
:&, Z5 :r !.':.l.. ) _'erss '(:"11
-
111C.r Surf... .;.... _le:"'tI _,era
UIt.t9.t~Ctd {:"OC&.
.r:., or fill I _Iera; _tern
~.4S. )UIlOl01_
Iftll ,,:~":.r )1_10
au,"",elS _'c~, _lere,
" ,e.r (jnelcl:' ~",.j _terti _1'"1
O. ~hll: I, .r'~c..'a.a~ lali tY'.(I) ..~ro:lC: 1::.1 HAVEN LOAM AND" "SOME PLYMOUTH LOAMY SAND.
;. to .~" ,,~'''' >1Cr:C~ ~ut'=Qtaqs ;n ~r:)ilC: Ij tI! _!.. "A..:'11
). .h.c II ~IOL' :, :..~cx!
N/A
i!ll ~..cl
ULna
."
.
..' . . .:
. .' . ' "
. -. .....
,. Approair..t. pe".nUS. .f propo_ p~"t air. ..t11 aI_I 0010: ~I l0011S ---1>1 '11: .r
.....cer _'1.. .
'. . .
7. Is proJ.ct contigllOYI ClI. ., _tll. I INn.... or ..lI U.... till latl...1 1It..ce, ,"II.,w,.O
Pl.ca' _fa ..1-..... .
. ,,' I......... , :;',', "
.. ...t II U1. upUl ClI CIMI ..tIr IIlIl., t.;J2.1oot ' .,. .. ., . ..... ,', .;.~ . ....
. . . . ..' ..' '. j . . .. ; . "., .,. ~..
t. IIp.llunelnl.r f"hlnl .,port..tttll ".....1' ..t., t. _ ,.o.jlCt -, _f. 'LJl-'
10. Do.1 project lit. canUt'!.lIIllpoc:t.1 of ,1 lilt or 11I1..1 lIf. CIIa. c t. t...ctft.... II ",roIC.ned .r
OIldlncere. _ _'a ~. .....1.. ... w..,ttr - ~III . . .
.
, ..
.' .
~
-..,' ..\ '
. -.. ~:;.
,
. ,
., .
.
11. Ar. t.~ere In, Yftlqu. or _...1 1Inll ,.... .. CIlI ...-J..c II'" (I... ellffl. .......... ..l..leal
.....Clonl _ _,a -l.Jle. .(lIoecr1. 1
12. II Ula proJoct 11&1 prellllcl, .... " ... _.tr .. "Poll nad II .. ... .... .. ......,.. ;;..:
..... . _"S ,J,;...ItI. ...... " '. ". ..' ..' '"
. ..". . ,..... _ a......... .~. . .... '.1."
13. lID" ~:: p"l.n~l.t. .ffer.r IIlCI_ .-.e ri_ .r ri..... .... &I .. .t...~, .c..''.!'!.~ttr'..' :.'
- - .' . . ',"
14. Stro_ wlUlI. or ClIlItll_ co p~1lCt .....1
,
I. __ of Itn.. IlI4 _ ., rlwer II ..eIl It .. trtlNcorr
I . .. ...,
N/A'
1
11. Lallal. Ponds. IIotllllel I"" wi tilt. or _..... &I ,.o.jlCt...... HI A
.
I. .... I II. 1.11 U. ......)
16. lIloc Is tho do..inlnt IInd YI, Ind zoning clllltftuttall wlthl. I 1/4 .11. r....9' UII anJlC' (...~
11.,1. fl..I, nllc\lnU&I. I-I) ucI CIlIacal. ., ...1..... (.... z a..,,). SlNliLE~NULT
RESIDENTlAL(TWO SIDES) AND VACANT A6RICULTURAL (TWO SiDES).... .
.. PRO.IECT DESCRIPTION
..--......
I. Ph,IICII ell..nllonl 1IIe1 lcol. .f proJect (ft11 I. .._t... II ",roprtl")
&. Tot&1 Conti,uoul Icreol' __ ~, proJICt......r 18.02 ICAI.
~. ""Joet Icnlg' eI.v.I.....:l~_ t'".I11'~~''''' .It_celt. . .
c. 'roJ.ct IC"I,' Co ....1. .....1._ OPEN SPACE. FROM CLUSTERING AND WELL SITE' INCLUDED
IN PRI80SED OEVELOPMEIIT AREA..... . . .
.. L.n,tll of proJ.ct. 1ft .n..: NIA Uf WI.,"'''). . . "
.' ,
.. If 'I'!lJ.ecC " III uPlnslon at ,"IIlIJW. 1..eI" '* ... WI .....1. """,..... .11.1.......... ,..&-
... Nt A I ...1..... ........ N~. . . . . . .
f. lUD.r 0' off-atreet parll.ng _CIS ..taU.. 11' . . ~ ,...,..... 72 (TWO fER. UNlf.~. ..
I. 11I_1_ ..hIC&lhr trip. .....r.toc\ plr .-'Z.l..-.J... ..,1..1.. ., ,...,on) ..',
h. I' "IId.nchl: M....r 11I11 tno of hltII.lIt ..ta:
.. On. "11I111 TlID F.nt .1t~,1. ,.n, CIIMa..l.
Initial 18 1~
UltlNu 18 18
.'
I. If: Drl.ftCIUon
III tclhboMlOOcloC I t1"'" 1...1 11'1.. ..,10,-' .t,'
Cannarchl ~
Illdus tr t"
J. Total h.I,ht of ul1l1t proPOI" It~ ?4 fW..
. .~ ..
-2- :
2. ~ DUcll nlturll mlt.rill
.
(1... ,uck. IIrth. .tc.) .111
III JWaV~ f.... i site .
o
o
ton.
I
" ,
-
10.
cub 1 c ,ards.
3. IIow ..n1 Ie"'S of v.g.ution (t....l. .11...... gioDund covers) .111 III ..-avlll ,.... ,'te . -1L-lcra.
4. Will Iny ..ture for'lt (OVI.. 100 "11" old) or ot/ler locall,.I.,orunc vlg.tltion ~ r_ved b, CIlIl
proj.ct? _'IS .LNo .
5. Ar:' th.Ml Iny pll/1s for ....vl1.UC1on to repl". CIlIt JWaved during const",ctiont .:L-'u'_-
I. If 11ngl. ph... pMlj.ct: Anticipated p.rlod 0' construction .l!-_Chs. (Includlng d_llt10n).
7. If ..ltl-phu.d proj.ct: a. Totel n....r 0' jIhI'" OIICIClplted ,-:,,-No.
b. Anticlplted dlt. 0' : m't-t pili" 1 MAY _C111988 y.ar (Includf.,
~lltlOl1I
Co Appro.iute COlIIIIl.clon dlte 'fMl p/lue MAY _CIl mll1ur. . .'
II. I. plla.e 1 'fMACllll, ..p.-dent on lubllClUlllt pIlIs,s' -:--'" -.JIto
.. Will bluting occu" during conlC",cClonl .-JU J-Wo . ,
t. 1Iuab... of jobl g.n.raclII: dur1ng c:on.tniCClon ..1L; after ~lCt I. COIIPl.ce ..J....
NlII'b.r of jobl .1Inlnlted by this projKC L. "
11. Vlll project ...quire relocaclon 0' lilY proJecCI or ',,\1leful _'u -1..Jlo. 1'''', IIpllln:
. ,
. .
12. I. Is lurflce or lubsurflCl liquid Wllte lI"jllIl&l IlIvelY_t . L.'u ---ItA.
b. If yes. IndlC1t. type 0' .UC' (_91. In"'Cr1al. ,ce.) SEWAGE
C. If surflc, dlspoul n... of Icre.. Into .hlch effluenC .111111 dllchlrg.d
.
N/A
13. Will surface are! of ..lst1ng Ilk... pondl. ac....... IIIyI or ot/ler lurflCl ..-tINI1' III Incrll'" or
dlc......d by ~ropo..1? _'a ...J....No.
14. Is projlct or Iny portion of projlct located in t/II 100 ,..1' flood pl11nl _'" ..l.-Ilo
15. I. Dol' projlct tnval'l. disposal of 101Id Wlltel J-'u _No
b. If yes. wl11 1/1 IlllsUng lolld .uti dlspolll 'Icillty be unlit -L'u _No
Co If YII. giv. n_:SOUTHOLD TOWN LANDfIL~ locatfall CUTCHOGUE
.
d. Will I/IY W"UI not go Into Is_g. dlsposII lYSe:. or Into I sanitary l_,nll ~'u :2.-11<
II. Will proj.ct us. h.rblcides or p.ntclde" _'II -L'llI
17. Will proj.ct routln.ly produc. odors (m... thin 0" hOur "'1' day)l ,.. X No
- -
1.. Will proj.ct produc. op.rltlng noise "Clldln, t/Ie 10Cll ....IIIICI IIOIsI llVehl _'" 2-No
19. V11l proj.ct rl5ul~ in III Inc...... In "'rv ul.l 2.-'" _No. I',... IndlCAtI ~.(.)
OIL. GAS OR ELECTRIC FOR HEATING. ELECTRIC FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.
20. It wltlr supply II fl"lllll ..l1s Indtate p--.lng Clpaclty N/ A gall/.lnute.
21. Totll InticipIU~ witt I' ungl ~.r dly ..J 1.000 9Ih/elly.
22. Zontng: I. Whit Is deainlnt 'zoning CllsslflcAtlon of lite' RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL
b. Curnnt ,~.clftc zonIng .cllssiftclclon of ,'CI RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL'
c. Is propoSld uSI CgRI Utlnt wi th p",s,"t zoning' NO
d. If no. Inclclt. d..lred zoning
...
AFFORDABLE HOlJSING DISTRICT
.)0
.
. 'TtiOJ:.,l. .
a, (s 1111 fede,al ,.,.tt rtq~I""" --1- .J...JlI
II, IlaeI ,ra,llCt 1_1" Stice .r ,..., ,...tlll Ir ftMlIcl",l
c, Loc.' 1/141 "'10lIl1 l1li"'"'"' ,
.
Zi. "",ronls:
'.
C, I"FOaKATICI~ OETAILS
Appro...l bqul.....
('.' II) ,,(T_) ,
YES '~ ZONE,
,m:: "
",~;)~
, ,
,-
"
_V,!" ...L..II
" .'
.
,
" .
... \
-,
...
.
......
ltlbattul Approval
~"') (\lice)
,.
" ,
,
. ,
"
.
Cltl. Vtllig, laard
Cltl. Village 'laMtlll ......
Cltl.
Cltl, ount MIi tIllMM_
Oth...
Oth', r,gloni ..encl.,
Sc.t, AgencIes
"',al Alenct..
-
-,
-
" .
.
. ,
"
,
; . .~.' .'
. . .... ~ .
.:.
AttiCh 1.1 addl tlonil tn'a.....ttan II Nl be ~ ce cllrt~ lOuP proJect. I' elM... 'rI' or "1 lie IlIt ;,'
ad.,n, lll~.cts u,aclued with till' ,roPlUI. '1.... '-ICIIII ... ....U .. till ....u.... "'tell eM ·
"ken Co altlgat' or 'v
PUPAlER'S SIGlIo\TURE:
TITLE:
1lEJI'.ESUlTIIlG:
. DATE:
'--....
.
.
PRES10ENT - PECONIC CIATES
ISAAC SAIDMEHR - SOUTHOLP VI~LAS
~MRER. 24. 1987
.
.
,
.- ..
.'
-4-
.
,
,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
FILE
Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner
RE: Affordable Housing Proposal (Saidmeyer Property) SBL# 70-01-6.
DATE:
June 23, a987
I met with Robert} Brown of Fairweather Brown and with Merle Wiggin,
also of the same firm, to discuss the above proposal. We discussed the pre-
ferred layout for the roads, which they essentially did not have a problem with.
They will come in with a sketch based on my road layout suggestion after dis-
cussing it with Mr. Saidmeyer.
Evidently, Mr. Saidmeyer would prefer to develop half the property
as townhouses. The remainder of the property would be sold as single family
lots under the affordable housing guidelines. I have no problem with that.
I advised theln to submit a sketch, whereupon the Planning Board would propably
set up a meeting to discuss the proposal with them.
I made it clear that at this pjint in time, the largest obstacle is
the lack of potable water. Until that is resolved, there is no point in
moving ahead with a change of zone application. Merle said that the well
on the site had been tested about a month ago. He will send me a copy of
the test results when he gets them. Last year
centrations orbitrate. I asked if moving the
geous. Merl'said that that idea was already
the well had excessive con-
well upland would be advanta-
discussed, but that the current
test well site was the one recommended by the Health Department. (?).
.
KREIGER WELL & PUMP CORP.
P. O. Box 101 Main Road
MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952
..
TO
peconic Associates, Inc
Phone 298-4141
PO Box 672
. Gr~~npg:rt. NY 11944
477-0300 Merle Wigrins
I SHOPPED VIA I FAll........
DESCRIPTION
ALESPERSOH
QUANTITY
DAoTE.1HlPPEP
Ua"well to 70 feet
2)
NOTE
ORIGINAL
Ii j [<:.::.1 j
L.>~.... '"'.-1
\~\ "
'0'./
DATE
1/15/86
SHIP TO
Meadow Farms
Main Road
Southo1d
."'."..'4.,.>$."'.""'.....,......_..,."""'. l1iftII4I
.. -~".~~..~.....'"""'. ..-.-'''''''
Installation of our own pump (lOBP)..
Ill' X 20 I Johnson stainless steel!lcre~n
Test pump for volume
,',--',,, ii
ll_._J J I..
W
No
ORDER NO
Test pumped at 250 gpm for 48 hOllr?L?aD\pliJ1g~ ery
half hour until draw down is ?tapi:I,izedLa,nd 6
to 8 hour periods thereafter
21' well approximately 200 feet from. te?t .Wel.L...?..t.e.
to monitor draw down. Chemicalte?t? fOL chJo!;:i._ e?
iron, nitrates, PH and detergents.Sampling.foI:
pesticides and organics by. County
Material beyond 70 feet was uJ1!la,ti!lfact:ory
Removed pump and sealed well
Contract
Add'l time & MAterial to 12 feet
10 water tests instead of 0 e
Generator rental
.-,;'f
" ~ J ,
. !'\~t"""
c: '1;)..' J\Ut'
O.i..... . ~t;:..~
t".. "-\. .-\1/,1'
-~" Gc.J'
"P-':1 cP
? ,e: \,w
"v'"
IS
Total
peposit
Balance
CQP:w,fo cyOtli
W'~ !:"':
4786
.... ,'.,
w~ ......'..
.. ... .-- "---1
"---1
I
............_......_.__.H.!
!
I
'-1
709.
8758.
......--......--.............----.-
2400.
6358.
KREIGER WELL & PUMP CORP.
WElL ORILUNG - WATER SYSTEMS
BOX 101 . MAIN ROAD. MATTITUCK, NY 11952. PHONE 298-4141 . 727-2124
MEADOW FARMS
LOG FOR 8" WELL
LOCATED APPROX. 600' WEST OF TERRY COURT &
700' NORTH OF MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD
1) Started pumping 9:25 AM Jan 13,1986, pumped for 48 hours
at 260 gpm
2) Completed pumping at 9:30 AM Wed. Jan 15,1986
3) At no time during the 48 hour period did the chlorides
exceed 50 ppm
4) The draw down was stabilized within one hour of starting
5) Maximum draw down was 3 feet @ 260 gpm
6) There was no draw down on observation 2" well, located 200
feet west of main well
8" WELL 70 FEET DEEP
STATIC 33 FEET
FROM 70 FEET TO 100 FEET MATERIAL WAS UNSATISFACTORY ( MICA, SAND,
CLAY AND MUD) AT 104 FEET IT TURNED SALT
SAMPLES WERE TAKEN AS FOLLOWS:
1- 10:00 AM 1/13/86 8- i2:0LAM 1/14/86
2- 10:35 AM 1/13/86 9- 6:00 AM 1/14/86
3- 11:05 AM 1/13/86 10- 12:00 PM 1/14/86
4- 11:35 AM 1/13/86 11- 6:00 PM 1/14/86
5- 12:05 PM 1/13/86 12- 12:01 AM 1/15/86
6- 2:05 PM 1/13/86 13- 6:00 AM 1/15/86
7- 6:00 PM 1/13/86 14- 9:30 AM 1/15/86
~
MAY 2. () 1987
..
<.
PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineering, Marine & Energy Consultants
Environmental Planning
One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672
Greenporl, New York 11944
(516) 477-0030
HEHORANDUH FOR THE RECORD
TO: Southold Villas File
FROM: Merlon ~
SUBJECT: Meeting with Southold Town Planner - Valerie
Scopas.
DATE:
May 2/il, 1987
============================================================
Meeting with the new Southold Town Planner, Valerie Scopaz,
Rob Brown, Jim HcMahon, and Hr. Saidmehr.
After an informal discussion of the proposed developement
which would include eighteen (18) affordable house lots and
eighteen (18) town houses it was concluded that further
preliminary plans could not be proceeded with until the
following informal feed back was obtained from the Planning
Board:
1. Ingress and Egress:
In anticipation of the development to the properties
either to the West or the South, would a temporary cul-
de-see to be used as a future connection to a street(s)
to the adjacent properties be acceptable as far as the
Zoning Code requirements.
2. Where this proposed development would require a change
of zone, would the change of zone be only to Affordable
or would a combination "H" and Affordable be required?
3. Some input as to whether this proposed yield of two (2)
units per acre be an acceptable way to go on the
expectation that clustering would be used for both the
affordable house lots and the town houses.
The present plan would include the development of a well
including all the necessary treatment that might be
required, and the transfer of the well site to the Village
of Greenport in return for hook-up to Village water.
~~~~
1
"
.
Sanitary disposal would be on-site septic tanks and leaching
pools.
The above summary is my understanding of the meeting. If
any inconsistencies are noted, please contact the writer.
cc, Isaac Saidmehr
Rob Brown
James McMahon
Valerie Scopaz
2