Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-123.-4-4 Sk SkET(ZH ! I,_ RaPc M%,P P )P PPOP05ED L11WE CHANGE PQEPA2E PQEPAR-ED FJ2 i AT wF /~1V.Sa's~ V C~gNa M? MA,T r li _ N i W A0 6th n m x sNk N W O - zZ0 N . ( ) ADD2E5=E5~ W I m 2 `aN~c CO vwno i V CD a I ' - __-TFirh1 AS T'i<--MAS A.P_hLME2 m l7 e 1f9 sly COL o0+~ 0 } Faeox i8 gppROVED BY s0 FQQOx i CUTCHOC CJTCH4GUE N,Y_,_I_L93_S -3 0# "EL,298 s275 PLANNING BOARD W N v. ~ %4l X98 J Qp p MP 3 ` !J TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - O _S3~E.N 'Q I / A~LY CURBED,`~O JOAN r. 1_,1 'ex ST C2or.7gJ 2 v° WESTp u°i h E OCT 3 1994 P_ SUNhiVSlDE LANE a 'WEST PO R T-, CT. 06880 ' O O t~! Y d 2 I N Q j I ~ 0 15TQ(L'! FR HO g 59 ' U x I 3 ru I' .t w 217 j I N/FTORREY I ~I I pp NEy ,1~ K Vary 6~ * ~ 1 ~ G Nu tbEm+^iC FO vp.~rfl.n caLE I'% unaumoncse euemnen n. ersmumu b Ale survaY Is a vlc!9mn al Seglpn )p0901 Aa Neel Yotl~ $lye Eeueapan bw. AaPane eam~soi^ sY map rIN baaeny embwsee oeai shealL~~ Uu y°yneldered bbaa velle hua copy, ' o ,~q ~ i O~°~ qL Gu92nleen Intllca;hf r,omon:h.;l vn only to the parson br vrnum Aa %-y b PrePamtl. autl on hla bshall to Aa 01a eomPanY. 5wwnmen;al aCaneY anp n (2 (l R ~ ryt R ~ b~plnp lnsllWUCn;sstl hrean aiM , In1 L5 ll9 6 Il 6 ICI to Ae esslgnua o~n,~o....,.__._.. ZE'llontil Lis4WJp~v'gll6Ybp~ 4 MAR 2 51994 U ONir~°es°eo o r FF^.Z3, \ VEY MP.F into-123•µ_A - - 6CYi-I % l 2. f ROPE2TY 15 _ICJ ESW D;1 G Z~ SE =t" ? - Cph!' =,2 SHOWtS RcFfEEc= To SUFI, ~ CP`.v..AFtrIAL.~URUEY•GigTUNi=MEA~:SEALE'vE'~ i I - PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS" Richard G. Wand, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr.; . Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE October 4, 1994 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Thomas A. Palmer P.O. Box 218 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed lot line change for Thomas A. Palmer & Joan C. Gibbs SCTM# 1000-123-4-4 & 5 Dear Mr. Palmer: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 3, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated February 23, 1994. Conditional final approval was granted on June 13, 1994. Al conditions have been fulfilled. Enclosed please find a copy of the map which was endorsed by the Chairman. The mylar maps, which were also endorsed by the Chairman, must be picked up at this office and filed in the office of the County Clerk. Any plat not so filed or recorded within sixty (60) days of the date of final approval, shall become null and void. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely; Richard G. Ward Chairman enc. cc: Tax Assessors Building Dept. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 'Y y _4 Richard G. Ward, Chairman 7-z ? Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. " y P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald "f Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 14, 1994 Thomas A. Palmer P.O. Box 218 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed lot line change for Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs SCTM# 1000-123-4-4 & 5 Dear Mr. Palmer: The following took place at the June 13, 1994 Planning Board public meeting: The final public hearing for the lot line change of Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs was closed. WHEREAS, Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs are the owners of the property known and designated as SCTM# 1000-123-4-4 & 5 located on Deep Hole Drive in Mattituck; and, WHEREAS, this lot line change, to be known as lot line change for Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs is for a lot line change to subtract 9,300 square feet from a 21,500 square foot parcel and add it to a 11,900 square foot parcel. WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on May 23, 1994; and, WHEREAS, a variance was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on May 4, 1994; and Page 2 Palmer/Gibbs Lot Line Change June 14, 1994 WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said lot line change application at Town Hall, Southold, New York on June 13, 1994; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and be it therefore, RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated February 23, 1994 and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to fulfillment of the following condition. This condition must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution. 1. The filing of new deeds pertaining to the merger of the 9,300 square feet from the 21,600 square foot parcel SCTM# 1000-123-4-4 with the 11,900 square foot parcel SCTM# 1000-123-4-5. A copy of the recorded deed must be presented to the Planning Board prior to endorsement of final survey. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, / / I rG~2~/ ~ 5 Richard G. Ward Chairman THIS LOT LINE CHANGE BETWEEN AND IS LOCATED ON IN SCTM# 1000- LOT LINE CHANGE Complete application received rAVOLI Application reviewed at work session n oK AM inro. OK Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised submission received inro. OK AA_ oK inro. Lead Agency Coordination SEQRRA determination `n f~ ~~~~t6w~ S~z3 NQ hc_ AWR OK Sent to County Planning Commission 5 inro. P(~YYK:00WL/A G Review of SCPC report rAM ro.` oK Draft Covenants and Restrictions received in A00 •t Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed s- oK Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Final Public Hearing 13 .4 Approval of Lot Line -with conditions iv 1311!i Endorsement of Lot Line 10 J: Ijq 4 T msI/1/90 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: 4 p) 1T Liber A9g0 Page .W..1................. On .01-.~.3.-.8~ ; Liber Page On Liber Page On Liber Page On Liber . J.~.OG. J Page ...a9............... On .I.O .-.0. ~..-.75... ; as devised under the Last Will and Testament of or as distributee . 5. The area of the land is /0 acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except . 7. The land is encumbered by ti,IA mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Li Page in original amount of $ unpaid amount $ held by address (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber Page in original amount of unpaid amount field address 0 D MAR 2 51994 $pLIT140LD 10WN PLANNING BOARD (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber Page in original amount of unpaid amount held by address 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except .....'I~{ 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts ...1 4() 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept No 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (Thins) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is .....IYIA 13. Water mains will be laid by A/h and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. .14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by /V//q and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. n 15. Gas mains will be installed by Nl1........................................ and (a) (no) charge will be made for ins lling said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "L'"' hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the coarse of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The app icant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be VIA. . as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule("F". DATE 19.... . . ...Y)~ ...~.I ~1 ~ (Name of plicant) (Si nature an Poo.8 0.X. a la .C.u.-C P1.4 - i c.Ay 1113S- (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF .......It/ . ss: On theme . S........... day-5 f..."..L.L ~ .............1 19....~ before me personally came . . to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. JOYCE M. WILKINS Notary Public, State of New York No. 4952246, Suffolk Cou Notary Public Term Expires June 12, 19. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss: On the day of 19......, before me personally came ..........................to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that resides at No . ................................that is the of the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. and that signed name thereto by like order. Notary Public Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, a~~ PLA~N'NINGGY3OARD TOWN O i'SOU Ii'OLD SL•FFOL~TY A JI .~1 ~~v Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765.1933 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUIIPIITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FO N TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the office of the-Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence: 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes No (Attached is a list-of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your ownersh' abutting this parcel? Yes No 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes No 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town.,- State, County, etc.) Yes No 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? Yes No 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? • Yes No 7. Does this property have a valid certificate of occupancy, if yes please submit a copy of same Yes No I certify that,the above statements are true and o:ill be relied on by th Planning Bgar in considering this application. Signature' of property owner or authorized agent date Attachment to questionnaire for.-the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: On the day of QJ2~ u~. 19, before me Personally came_ ( 0iP..S A 'HaLr,-)Q to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrum and ackno ledgedarexecuted the same. Notary u is YCE M. No' Publ c, State ofiN wYork N074952246, Suffolk Coup Term Expires June 12, 19 f /L-) % //d / G191V I/ rc% 30191cb u?/Ij or` Sew % ~~~Q RhU~f1,P/ 7-111Z Ow/!I'2S v T fr'w iY~ oYc'D P6/?cc/- C7" Th~~ T WC i / ~4/r L1J ci 7 /.T 71-k, JOYCE M. WILKINS Notary Public, Stete of New York No. 4952246, Suffolk Cou Term Expires June 12, 19~ %3 i1/~ IQ1191~11,1in)3 lioorl'b %w1>r Tr/vG 5131 W,6 Tt/e ~ ww~k ~t Gct:f~7 f fix/ 2) 05 a ,P Lit, 17W-17! Tie 12 G~ % / IWO AIDAC if /'T /'Rep e 7-1142 CGS inch ( l D.~~ss ~s 1111A 9 if/erv f~US~ i fJ C~ ~,5 ~`,vG IS U~G~G Ti7i' TiY/e /yl(3he / rolz JOYCE M.WILKINS Notary Public, State of New York No. 4952246, Suffolk Cour~y Term Expires June 12, 7 f 8 SUNNYSIDE LANE WESTPORT, CONNECTICUT 06880-1710 March 15, 1994 Southold Town Board Southold, New York 11971 To Whom It May Concern: I am the owner of the property located at 2140 Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck, New York 11952. This property is in the process of being sold to Thomas Palmer. I have no objection to Mr. Palmer applying for a lot line permit. Cordially Yours, Joan C. /s Notarized: 14 No?d~ P't ~ I • .b'YG~k ida F;f~3'.. "'-JV Quahiied in Wu Jtciva:er county - Commisswri Expires 1D" ,-7 / 19J-1 r 14-16-2 (2;87)-7c • • 617.21 MAR J 11"Al A Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR u,_I Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ? Part 1 ? Part 2 ?Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ? A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ? B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ? C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If differentfrom responsible officer) Date 1 'ART 1-PROJECT INFORMAT. N Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may hive ,i signlfleanE on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will he as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review Provl(l< in i 'Ud information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable. so indicate and 'per !s-. each instance. NAME OF ACTION - LOCATION OF ACTION Q clutlg Sir; ee( Address, Municipality antl Canty) " C Z~ 03 ' /N ;R d NAME OF APPLICANTISPO NSOR RUSIN ESS TELEPHONg ADD SS n- CITYIPO . STATE I Z!P CODE NAME OF OWNER pt different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS ------T'-----__...__._ CITY/PO STATE ZIP COLE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ?Urban ?Industrial ?Commercial Residential (suburban) FiRural (non-farm; ?Forest ?Agriculture ?Other 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested ?V / acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) -acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECI_) acres acres Water Surface Area H acres acre; Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres _ acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres Other (Indicate type) _ acres licr 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: aWell drained _ff © % of site Moderately well drained of site ?Poorly drained of site b. If any agricultural land is involved how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through -1 of tho 'Ys Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ?Yes 46N0 a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 2. How much natural material (i.•ock, earth, etc.) will be removed from site? /YJiLIC11 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ?Yes []No AA a. If yes, for what intend_.: purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ?Yes ?No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ?Yes ?No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ?Yes Klo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ?Yes ?No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ?Yes AO 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ?Yes No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ?Yes /0N0 a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ?Yes (,>r.~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ?Yes A-0 Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ?Yes ?No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ?Yes XNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ?Yes A0 c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ?Yes o e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ?Yes P6 No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? ~y>eaarrs. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ?Yes L. o 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ?Yeso 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ?Yes ~rNo 21. Will Project result in an increase in energy use? ?Yes PNo If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. L 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ?Yes 6~o If Yes, explain 4 5, Approximate percentage of prop( project site with slopes ?o IoY'(, - ?IS°'o or gloater _ 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or c-o tain a building, site, or district, listed on the ite ,i t4~ V,3?on:r, Registers of Historic Places? ?Yes WNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks' "I o ">&'o 8. What is the depth of the water tablet (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ?Yes XNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? XYes -.No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ?Yes >No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? p-e., cliffs. dunes other rotogic 1 t<:rmetions' ?Yes XJ o Describe 13. Is the project sit resently used by the community or neighborhood as an open ;pact, or ~ r ri aeon area? ?YesN0 If yes, explain 14. Does the presen1111 i e include scenic views known to be important to the community% ?Yes No r~ 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: :A lI a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area. a. Name DtEp HbicCyCo< b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? XYes ?No / a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? fyuyes ?No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ?Yes ANo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-A,1, Section 303 and 304? ?Yes JANo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ?Yes 4KNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ?Yes kN0 B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor `5 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed- _~acres initially; acres ultimately - e. Project acreage to remain undevelo ped 17 acres. d. Length of project, in miles- (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed - g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h_ If residential- Number and type of housing units One family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; _ width; length j. Linear feet of frontage along a public th roughfare project will occupy is? _ Yt 3 Part 2-~OJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR OGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact,, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ? ? ?Yes ?No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ? ? ?Yes ?No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ? ? ?Yes ?No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ? ? ?Yes ?No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ? ? ?Yes ?No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Construction in a designated floodway. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts ? ? ?Yes ?No 2. Will there be an effect t=....Iy ur:,que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)?NO ?YES L • Specific land forms: ? ? ?Yes ?No 6 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board Eyes DNo City, Town, Village Planning Board &(Is es DNo City, Town Zoning Board ?No City, County Health Department DYes dNo _ Other Local Agencies DYes -VSNO Other Regional Agencies Dyes MNo State Agencies ?Yes DNo Federal Agencies Dyes Oi!No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? I(Yes DNo If Yes, indicate decision req'~yrred: ?zoning amendment Voning variance Especial use permit ?subdivision j-i;'w plan ?new/revision of master plan ?resource management plan Dother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R 10 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning) 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? R60 5. Whatis the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zonina? C 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land n,e pl ur,7 KYc No 7. What are the predominant land us'eb;) and zoning classifications within a mile radius uA proposed at hor;i sli 8_ Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within Ayr„ No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? I;An) 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water distncW Wiles No 11 Will the proposed action create ~ a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police_ fire protection)? ?Yes tnNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes GNo 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? EYcs No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ?Yes DN'o D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the rneasures which you propose to n;itil;ate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above ttrrye to the best of my knowledge. ApplicantlSpon ame TI ~G/yj _ Date Signature t/r})1/ Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ENO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ? ? ?Yes ?No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ? ? ?Yes ?No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ? ? ?Yes ?No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ? ? ?Yes ?No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ? ? ?Yes ?No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 0 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ENO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ? ? ?Yes ?No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ? ? ?Yes ?No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ENO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ? ? ?Yes ?No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ? ? ?Yes ?No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ENO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 - • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ? ? ?Yes ?No C land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 Small to Potential ; Can 1 r HC IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate j Lary Miter ca [3 Impact Impact I prof change I (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ~ LINO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. r1 • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland- • Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? LINO OYES - Examples that would apply to column 2 j • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ? es _,,,c, • Other impacts: No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater ' i quality or quantity? ENO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Yes -IN a j C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ? ,Yeti - ti„ I have approval to serve proposed (project) action. ! i " • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 Yes ]No gallons per minute pumping capacity. - • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ] Ye+ 'v supply system, • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ? Yes No 11 • Liquid effluent will be conveye _I off the site to facilities which presently ? _ryc s No { do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ? - L ! I1'es !F 'No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ? ? ~ t]yts ~]No , existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ? !__]No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ? _'y(.s -`)No ~ anti/or sewer services - • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ? a ~s No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities - • Other impacts ? I -;s , ~No r G Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? LINO EYES • Examples that would apply to column 2 1 Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ? .JYes o 7 - 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By LINO ?YES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ? ? ?Yes ?No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ? ? ?Yes ?No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? - LINO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ? ? ?Yes ?No i facility. t • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ? ? ?Yes ?No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ? ? ?Yes ?No noise screen. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ? ? ?Yes ?No substances (i.e. Oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ? ? ?Yes ?No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ? ? ?Yes ?No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ? ? ?Yes LINO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous t- waste. L • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 10 1 6rnali to °oterrtial j can hnpaci Moderate Large Mrt!gateri Impact Impact project clean, qe~ • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of j agricultural land. , • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more lv~ than 2.5 acres of agricultural land • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural [ land mana6gements stems (e Y'" _ t o y .g-, subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (eg_ cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: -_!1'cs 1 No , I j IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? CNO CYES t (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617 21, Appendix B Examples that would apply to column 2 _ • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from C - or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether t Ye, L.No man-made or natural • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of - - aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their --)'es LJ VO enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant F] screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. t --Yes ?No j • Other impacts: --Yes ?No i IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES t 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance) LINO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 3 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ? r"' - j contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of LiNo I of historic places - • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ? ~ I ~ i= yes project site. ?No • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ? r~ t archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. L1 Yes JNo • Other impacts: - ~ I_a Yes ~~No C I IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13- Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 LINO ?Y[S • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. J ' }"r s Yes Yes D NNo • Other impacts: 1 i (]o 11'ec IJ iV> 9 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ? ? ?Yes ?No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ? ? ?Yes ?No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ? ? ?Yes ?No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ? ? ?Yes ?No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ?NO ?YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 i a. 14 1 t (2'e7)-9c 617.21 S EQ R Appendix B S t ,te Environmental Quality Review Visual EAR' Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-3 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ? ? ? ? ? to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ? ? ? ? ? observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ? ? ? ? ? Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ? ? ? ? ? • The State Forest Preserve? ? ? ? ? ? • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ? ? ? ? ? • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ? ? ? ? ? natural features? • National Park Service lands? ? ? ? ? ? • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ? ? ? ? ? or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ? ? ? ? ? as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ? ? ? ? ? or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ? ? ? ? ? scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ? ? ? ? ? • County road? ? ? ? ? ? • State? ? ? ? ? ? • Local road? ? ? ? ? ? 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) i ?Yes ?No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ?Yes ?No i1 i 1 i _ I3~ ~ _ts wi~hin: I.___ No ?'NO -ct e provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate., r ikely to observe the proposed project is ur AE or unknown, use best estimate. v i h the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally ? ? ~l tiv ? ? ? ? t-1 ? ? i - 2 11r~"13Pe3'76 •JUI.IV~ BIUM•CB O. INC.. r.l1 M' BLI.NN VUBL,f NIN` T 691 Nt.mAnul 6.1 N.AF 11 n Hlllll' yr fnq~l1'rvin I beer xllh rile innill xrn 1n1 lor'v nr} n F CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT - THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY THIS INDENTURE, made the 3 n day of June nineteen hundred and ninety-one BETWEEN Thomas A. Palmer residing at 2050 Deep Hole Dr., Mattituck, New York 11952 party of the first part, and Thomas A. Palmer and Karen Palmer, his wife, residing at 2050 Deep Hole Dr., Mattituck, New York 11952 party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable considerati paid by the party of the, second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the he or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, pi"-c or parcel of land. with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situa lying and being iFfOic at Mattituck in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the southwesterly side of Deep Hole Drive, distant 576.00 feet southeasterly from the southeasterly side of Richard Street, as same is prolonged: THENCE southeasterly along the southwesterly side of Deep Hole Drive along the arc of a curve having a radius of 330.00 feet, a distance of 41.0 feet; THENCE south 29 degrees 37 minutes 30 seconds west 200.00 feet to the wood retaining wall (220 feet, more or less, to the High Water. Line); THENCE northwesterly along the High Water Line 75 feet, more or less. THENCE north 38 degrees 53 minutes east 205 feet from the retaining wall (225 feet, more or less, from the High Water Line) to the southwesterly side of Deep Hole Drive, the oin or place of BEGINNING. FRMFS1 TAX ,MAP DESIGNAT ION DIST. 1000 fOGETHEll with all right, title and interest, if any. of the party of the first part in and to any streets SEC. 123' roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurienanr and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO 1101 BLK. 04. 0 the premises herein granted Onto the party of the second part. the heirs or successors and nssigns of the party the second part forever. LOT: 005 AND the party of the first pnrt covcnmlls that the party of Ihr. first part has not done or suffered anything wherl the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the fi part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, [lie part} of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first niv written. IN PRESENCE 11F: 4i//~sci"~ (///J~ gyp//nw/~~/~ i Thomas A. Palmer n273N377 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF 4'LU L--' ss: STATE OF NEW YOW OUNTY OF On the day of June 1991 , before me. On the day of fI before me personally came. Thomas A. Palmer personally canm I 4, nn: known to be the individual described in and who to we known to be the individual described in and who e ecnled the foregoing instrument, and acknuwled~ed Thal executed 111C foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that e_ executed the same. executed the same. nrrrl.4CFf LE RICH NCIq p 0t r' '.w YorH p:,_., - 1036 m u~r 31. T9 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF as: On the day of 19 before ine Oa like day of 19 , before me personally came personally came to ute known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and the subscribing witness to t11e foregoing instrument, with say Ihat he resides at No. whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he is the ' of that he knows the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he to be the individual knows the Seal of said corporation; t11at the seal a0ixul described in Mid who cxccuted the foregoing instrument; to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subx:ribing witness, was present and saw affixed by order of the baud of directors of said corpa-a- execute, the same; and that he, said wilnesv, tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed II name as witness thereto. 35argain anD Omit 3DccD secrtON WITU COVENANT AGAINST CRANTONs ACTS 11LOCK Le No. l,o'r COUNTY Olt'IOWN Thomas A. Palmer TO RETURN BY MAIL TO: Thomas A. Palmer and Karen Palmer, his wife 'Fibulas A. Palmer P. o. Iiox 218 Cutchogne, New York Zip No. 11935 u xtwv do > i:13ti !dlti3 u 3i1VA0N .4 16619 Nnr { 0 4 a~a~o~~d M 1 >4 4 A a RECEIPT 050182 Town of Southold FrvF:n H T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK uthold, New York 11971 DATE Phone: 516-765-1801 , ~ FOR: CASH RV---rJ ~IAECK ~7 7'11RU 9 MUST U1:'l'YP1:U UR l'R lV7'L"U IN U A , IPfIC ONLY Ply 'IO RE CORDING Olt VILING.' ,FOLK COUNTY CLIKIM 2 ~,t5 11 191P'561 ~ 3257 j $EO AUG 29 52 ml '34 ft ,E - ~bcrolpngca s i A1,.. A'i l'!rl _ I Ilti i1.N5 - AUG 29 1994 SUM Ct'UIdIY 9ai n TEIAN$fuRTAY. rill [Cate n COVJFFO UNTY log. 7 Decd / Morlgnge L~rlwmcnl Uced I I1lmignge Tax Slmup Recording / Filing S(angls 1 I i 11 Li' Page! Filing Fec Mortgage Amt. j i Handling _ 6 1. Basic Tax ' T'P-584 _/W 2. SUNYMA Notation Sub Tutal _ EA-5217 (County) S Sub Total ~Z! 3. Slice./Add. _ TOT. MTG. TAX 6A 5217 (Stale) Dwil R. P.T.S.. llual Tonn _Uual County held for Apporlioumeul Comm. of Kd. Transfer Tax it '1lHdarfl I Mansion Tax ertlffeJ Cepy The properly covered by this murlgagc Is or will be Improved by a one or two :eg copy _ Bub Told family dwelgng only. ' Y69_ or NU !der _ CRANB TOTAL.. U NU, see °ppropriate tax clause ' on page M of this Instrument. Red Properly Tax Service Agency Verification 'Pule Company Information -Section rrg - ` i lfucir ._.Lai_ i 1 -99-^ 1 GJ` T V.7~;~ a <t°'` NONE Ii U { l4J7 Company Name .14 1 - Hato CiVEW NONE Its 11iRliPAWBYt Title Number " xCnd Check x_7tCh°rge HOMA5 A. PALMER I as PO BOX 218 Payer same uRdcR_ r `,r ylp ;CbTCH000E, NY ! 11935 i 4~,{n Ti~. aid to'1 ~~1y)4 .I fl IEC01W ~c "TURN TO ; . I .f , q re 1. gyp,.. Suffolk County Reeordifig~, Endorsetneut P ge.S. I 2 5 TWs pogo forms punt Of the uttuctted bEED ! M v+, 1 11 lualte by: \ 14 a y.1 r ~ e < t1J7t3 ~ 1 ~ I,~G _:1 F t t' 1 L~ ¢ 1 Peed, MO1tgRgUr etc.) i~ '-THOMAS A PALMER ` ''I,:'?~tl premises herein Is Situated III SUI+FOLK COUNTY, NEW Y01 MW3 i l~, TO 1n llletOWN of SOUTH LD SOUTHOLDTO t THOMAS A PALMER' & t .t Lt, <r: KAREN PALMERI UXj1 the VILLAGE OC HAMLET of MATTITUCK I II .J Standard N.Y.B.T.U. Form 8002 • Bargain and sole Daddrdth covenant against Grantors A&dividual or corporation (Single Shat) CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT-THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY. THIS INDENTURE, made the d l~ day of August nineteen hundred and 94 BETWEEN THOMAS A. PALMER P.O. BOX 218, CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 2050 DEEP HOLE DRIVE, MATTITUCK, NY 11952 party ofthe first part, and THOMAS A. PALMER & KAREN PALMER, his wife P.O. BOX 218, CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 2050 DEEP HOLE DRIVE, MATTITUCK, NY 11952 I I party of the second part, WITI4ESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the building and improvements thereon erected, . situate, lying and being in the at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and ' described as follows: BEGINNING at a point set in the southwesterly side of Deep Hole Drive distant 2155.38 feet as'measured along Deep Hole Drive from the intersection of the westerly side of Deep is Do Hole Drive and the southerly side of New Suffolk Avenue, and from said point or place of beginning; it DO RUNNING THENCE along the southwesterly aide of Deep Hole Drive southeasterly along the arc of a curve having a i radius of 330.0 feet, a length of 41.0 feet; rlf 066 THENCE South 38 degrees 53 minutes W Hole Creek; eat 201.74 feet to Deep THENCE westerly along Deep.HCle Creek 46.0 feet to a j I Point; RUNNING THENCE North 39. *Yt l,, a 5,degreee~03'minutes East 119 feet)' Y THENCE North 30 degrees l3 m1nutes19ast 27,49 feet;,, RUNNING THENCE North '47~deljreea 21 minutes East 59.41 feet . i to`the-southwesterly aide of Deep Hole Drive,: the point or yy place of. BEGINNING, tA:~ , Nrp •1 I 1 r t:Af 10~1 1 1 10r. r ' 'T'OGETHER With all right, title and'intetesf,'if any, of the party of the IIrst part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described remises td the center lines thereof,, TOGETHER with the, f appurtenances and all the estate and' roIS'of did'Parly of the IIAVB AND TO HOLD the premises herein' Unto the first part irtland to said premises; TO ; t 1 successors and alai granted party of the second part, the heirs or i t tars of the party of the second art forever, . STATE OF NEW YORK dr l County of Suffolk `i {S LNii~f',"~4Y °,k t ,r,`. vitf, tY •nl,t, .4 1 { id'ii,1EDWARD P ROMAINE, Clerk of die Comity of Suffolk and Clerk of file Supreme Court of tine state' t of New'York In and for said County (Said Court being a Court of Record) DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the annexed w of ` ri V ' ' Vt Deed liber`_%/ 1.~ at Page / Recorded a/wand that it is it f usl and Ime copy of such otiguml ' t Deed ~T u of die Wholethere oL 1N TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set y hand and affixed the sea of said County }F and Court this day of VY; ¢Form No.104 4 ra ria>f'!Y Clerk ' - - ago faJ(,i•>. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman a~ a- pp Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. q ' P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. r : Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald ` ? a r(j Fax (516) 765.3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Thomas A. Palmer P. 0. Box 218 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Mr. Palmer: This letter will correct the Board's letter to you of October 4, 1994, in which the Board incorrectly mentions that mylar maps are to be filed in the office of the County Clerk. There were no mylar maps required for your Lot Line Change. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. rely, r7 Ward (Phairman 0 uzs PUBLISHER'S CERTIFICATE LEGAL 516 Town of Southold Notice Public Hearing State of Connecticut NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that f to Section 276 of me Town own Law, a Public public hearing ss. New London will be held by the Southold County of New London, Town Planning Board, Me Town own Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in n said Town on on the 13th lion of June, 1"4 on the suees- non of the following: 7:30 P Final public hearing y : On this t C r h day Jun e for the Proposed! minor sUbdIvI- Sian for Frances B. Rauch and antl Fish- ers Stewart Rauch, wn Jr., f Southold, County of Suf folk, State of New York, Suffolk County Tax Map A.D. 1994, personally appeared before the undersigned, Number 1000-9-9-22. The property is bordered on the north by land now or for- eastlYbyfHaylmHadrbor; on the a Notary Public, within and for said County and State, southeast by land now or for- merly of Galls; on the south by land now or formerly of Done- . Hex bylana owo ffoormerly ~ J. L. Zielinski. Leaa1 Advertising Clerk of Faulkner, by land now or tor- . merly of Evans, and by land now or formerly of Miller; on the west by land now or formerly of 7 Wood, by land now or formerly of THE T7~r L DAY, a dall~- of Litch, and by land now or formerly of May; and an the northwest by land now or for- merly of May, by land now or formerly of Hickey and by land now or formerly of Wilmerding. newspaper published at New London, County of New 7:35 P.M. Final public hearing for the proposed lot line change for Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State New London State. of Connecticut who being duly sworn of New York, Suffolk County O Tax Map Number 1000-1234A &5. The Property is bordered on the northeast by Deep Hole Drive; on the east by y land now states on oathr that the Order of Notice in the case of or formerly of Torrey; on Me southwest thwest by Deep Hole Creek; and on the west . land now or formerly M. Final oPublic hearing Legal Advertising Jb 5 1r,, for me minor subdivision for Pecunlc Homes, In Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suf- Suf- folk folk County Tax Map Number olk Co 3-7.1 a true copy of wlhich The Property Is bordered on the north by Sound Ave., by land now or formerly of Fein- berg and by land now or for- 'mady of Davison; on the nor,b_ ~I is hereunto annexed, was published in said newspaper in east by land now or formerly of Macarl 6 Alhadef; on the east by land now or formerly of Gulldl 6 Miller, on the southeast by Laurel Lake and by land its issues of the 9th now or formerly of Jahler; on the south by land now or for- merly of Horton; by land now or formerly of Jacoby; and by land now or formerly of San Andres days of June A.D. 1994. and Saland; and on the west by the open space for the Farmveu Associates Subdivision. Any Person desiring to be heard on the above matter ` L should appear at the time and place e 1, - Dated: Jun June 1, Order o By Of the Southold Town of Planning Board Richard G. Ward, Chairman Subscribed and sworn to befo me this 16 t n r=PLAUNNi3G',XD dayof June A.D.1994. y Public. Notar • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK • 9 ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HIBBERD, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER May 10, 1994 R RR M D t5 LS U Y R.G. Kassner Town of Southold Town Hall - 53095 Main Road G r P.O. Box 1179 ( 2 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN RE: Lot Line Change for Palmer and Gibbs PUNNING BOARD SCTM 1000-123-4-4 & 5 Dear Mr. Kassner: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received your letter dated April 18, 1994, concerning the above-referenced application, and has no objection to the Town's designation as lead agency. This correspondence is intended primarily to expedite the procedural requirements of SEQRA pertaining to the establishment of lead agency. The comments provided below are, therefore, general in nature, representing several of our most common concerns regarding Suffolk County projects. The department wishes, however, to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s) established for this action. 1. Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) 1. The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems, pursuant to the authority and requirements of Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the SCSC. Applications must comply with all relevant density and construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Applicants should not undertake the construction of, or connection to, either system without Health Department approval. 2. Where applicable, the department regulates the storage, handling and discharge of restricted toxic and hazardous materials pursuant to the requirements of Articles 7 & 12 of the SCSC. 3. If an application has not yet been submitted to the SCDHS, one should be filed at the earliest date to allow for the technical review of the proposed action. Project designs submitted to the department should be fully consistent with any action currently under review through the SEQRA process. 4. Design and flow specifications, information regarding subsurface soil conditions, water supply information, and complete design details are essential to the review of this project, and are evaluated fully at the time of application review. Should the town require additional environmental information (such as a DEIS), discussion of the compliance requirements of the SCDHS should be required. 5. Of particular concern to the department are those areas which because of elevated groundwater conditions, or soils which are not conducive to the proper functioning of conventional subsurface sanitary sewage disposal systems. Your agency should be aware that such conditions frequently require the use of fill or the excavation of subsurface soils to accommodate subsurface sanitary disposal systems constructed in conformance with the requirements of the SCSC. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD. N.Y. 11901-3397 852-2100 Letter to R.G. Kassner May 10, 1994 Page 2 6. The department is also significantly concerned with areas where access to potable water may be constrained by unacceptable groundwater quality and the lack of an available public water supply. All private water supply systems must be constructed in conformance with requirements of the SCSC. H. NATURAL RESOURCES: 1. The SCDHS fully supports all efforts to maximize protection of natural resources which may be impacted upon by construction and development activities. It is the position of the department that the SEQRA review process provides the greatest opportunity for comprehensive consideration of these resources, and that all practicable planning measures should be employed to help ensure their protection. Of particular concern to department is the adequate protection of wetlands, surface waters, natural communities, contiguous natural habitats, and rare, threatened and endangered species. In addition, efforts to protect sensitive physical resources such groundwaters, dunes, bluffs, shorelines, natural drainage channels, groundwater recharge areas, and steep slopes are fully supported and encouraged by the SCDHS. In general, the department encourages the following land use measures be considered (where appropriate) to actions being reviewed pursuant to SEQRA. 1. Maximum practicable setbacks from all wetlands, surface waters, dunes, and bluffs. 2. Non-disturbance buffers between wetland limits and required structural setbacks. 3. Clustering of subdivision lots to provide for maximum preservation of large contiguous areas of dedicated open space. 4. Stringent clearing limitations which can reduce potential impacts to wildlife habitats, vegetative communities, and unconsolidated soils. 5. Maximum practicable confinement of development to areas with slopes of less than 10%. 6. Maximum use of native species for landscaping purposes. 7. Construction of recharge areas, so as to minimize the amount of disturbance and structural modification to the site. 8. Maximum use of land-banked parking on commercial sites. 9. Minimal use of fertilizer-dependant turf and landscaping. 10. Employment of stormwater runoff control measures necessary to maintain runoff on-site. The department appreciates the opportunity to participate in the SEQRA review of this proposal. Additional information may be provided prior to the close of the established comment period. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078. Sincerely, n Kimberly Shaw Sr. Environmental Analyst Office of Ecology KS/amf cc: Vito Minei, P.E. Stephen Costa, P.E. SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: ~hIW4 SENDER: Va,& TTuy I SUBJECT: Pa~fY1~l I ~IIG~S L L SCTM#: t~ COMMENTS: ULI SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD f F PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS t "wa Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr.~ lei .:y3 ~~jaY Richard G. Ward =y "Y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 7 ~,u 2~ ,199 Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: 1 o T / //7' c 41le FO < Map of - %/4o1405 (q! ~(3TA/ )eQS Hamlet/ Lo/cality__ L /t z?" S.C.D.P.W. Topo No.: Zoning Lewlr~ 5/i>lFS/G'EYT/h~ ~?~-z/ S.C. Tax Map No.: voc _ 3 ,~S Ma Sub. Lo-FZ//V Crib ]or Minor Sub.t Site Plan Cluster MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Preliminary Plat (3 copies) : Road Profiles (1) Drainage Plans (1) _Topogroaphical Map (1) Site Plan (1) _ Grading Plan (1) Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet CONTINUED REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an (Unlisted) ~(~Type (Type II)ACtion. 2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes) (No). 4. The proposed division has received approval from the S.C. Dept of Health. (Yes) (NO). Comments : We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) (NO) Referral received 19 by Suffolk County Planning Commission and assigned File NO. ~~ry tr/ yours, Richard G. Ward Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ? P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. w Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE May 24, 1994 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Thomas A. Palmer P.O. Box 218 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Lot line change for Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs SCTM# 1000-123-4-4 & 5 Dear Mr. Palmer: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 23, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, established itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration on this Type I action. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, June 13, 1994 at 7:35 P.M. for a final public hearing on the maps dated February 23, 1994. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Sincerely, i hard G. and Chairman enc. 0 «T~ ~u.4gF"iiE 'ti S°fFOC r r°6 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS OG$ ~I< Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman CZ x Serge Doyen, Jr.•~ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road James Dinizio, Jr.~{)1 P.O. Box 1179 Robert A. Villa Southold, New York 11971 Richard C. Wilton Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS Telephone (516) 765-1800 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 23, 1994 Mr. and Mrs. Thomas A. Palmer P.O. Box 218 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Appl. No. 4232 - Variance for Lot Area Adjustments Owners: Thomas Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs Dear Mr. and Mrs. Palmer: Enclosed please find a copy of the Board's Findings and Determina- tion rendered at our May 4, 1994 Regular Meeting. Please be sure to return to the Planning Board for further processing of the final approval. For your convenience, we have furnished the Building Department and Planning Board with copies of this determination for their permanent recordkeeping and update. Also, we have transmitted a copy of this file to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with the Suffolk County Administrative Code rules and regulations pertaining to projects located within 500 feet of a waterway. Once we have received their written response, we will forward a copy to you as agent for the owner. Very truly yours, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN Enclosure cc: (With copies of this determination to:) Town Building Inspectors' Office Suffolk County Department of Planning Southold Town Planning Board d r7,1EMAY 3 P<;. SOU DK LD P l,-ru PLA„fllkf APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS o y Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr. L , Town Hall, 53095 Main Road James Dinizio, Jr.~~1 P.O. Box 1179 Robert A. Villa Southold, New York 11971 Richard C. Wilton Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (616) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS Telephone (516) 765-1800 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Appl. No. 4232. ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Upon Application of THOMAS PALMER and JOAN GIBBS. This is a request for a variance under Article IIIA, Section 100-30A.3, based upon the March 2, 1994 Notice of Disapproval for a lot-line change of two substandard parcels, having insufficient area and width as exist and as proposed. Location of Property: 2140 and 2200 Deep Hole- Drive, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Parcels 1000-123-4-4 and 5. WHEREAS, on March 2, 1994 a Notice of Disapproval was issued by the Building Inspector concerning an application to relocate center property line between two existing parcels, each improved with a single-family dwelling; and WHEREAS, on April 6, 1994, this area application concerning lot area and width for each of the two parcels was filed together with a single-and-separate search; and WHEREAS, after due notice, a public hearing was held by the Board of Appeals on May 4, 1994, at which time all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded (and no opposition was submitted); WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following Findings of Fact: 1. This is an application concerning two parcels of land, each as more particularly shown on the February 23, 1994 survey map prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. from which the following information was obtained: a) Parcel 1 consists of a total lot area of 21,500 sq. ft. and is referred to as Tax Map Number 1000-123-4-4 as conveyed 6/10/90 to Joan C. Gibbs. Page 2 - Appl. No. 40 0 Application of THOMAS PALMER and JOAN CIBBS Decision Rendered May 4, 1994 b) Parcel 2 consists of a lot area of 11,900 sq. ft. presently referred to as County Tax Map No. 5 as conveyed to Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Palmer 6/3/91. 2. By this variance application, appellants are requesting permission to re-draw the center division line as shown on the Sketch Map preared February 23, 1994 by Roderick VanTuyl with the following: a) Parcel 1 will change from 21,500 sq. ft. to 12,200 sq. ft. and from 82.0 feet to 41.0 feet in lot width; b) Parcel 2 will change from 11,900 sq. ft. to 21,200 sq. ft. in area and from 41.0 feet to 82.0 feet in lot width; 3. This property is located in the R-40 Low-Density Residential Zone District which requires 40,000 sq. ft. of lot area per new lot to be created (Article III, Section 100-30A.3, Bulk Schedule applicable to the R-40 Zone District). Since the two lots are substandard in size as exist (before this proposed change in the lot division line), an area variance is required to reduce the lot area of one - while at the same time increasing the lot area of the other. A single-and-separate search was submitted to show that these two lots were existing in single and separate ownership. since prior to enactment of one-acre zoning in 1971. Each of the two lots is improved with a single-family, one-story dwelling structure. 4. The percentage of relief sought by this application is zero for the reason that there is merely an exchange in lot size between Lot 1 and Lot 2 - without any other conveyance or split, and there is no increase in density or affect on the total area of the lots (combined total). 5. In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: (a) the relief as granted is not substantial in relation to lots established in the close vicinity of this, property and does not create increased lot density; (b) the circumstances are uniquely related to the property and there is no method feasible for appellant to pursue other than a variance; (c) the relief requested will not cause a substantial effect on available governmental facilities; z Page 3 - Appl. No. 42_ Application of THOMAS PALMER and JOAN GIBBS Decision Rendered May 4, 1994 (d) the variance will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience, or order of the town, or be adverse to neighboring properties; (e) the relief sought by applicant cannot be achieved by a method other than an area variance; (f) the proposed variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in this neighborhood or zone district - the new location of the division line is for record purposes and is not visible to the lands; (g) the difficulty is related to the uniqueness of the property and is not self-created; (h) the relief requested will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. (i) in view of the manner- in which the difficulties arose, and in considering all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the variance, as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Member Wilton, seconded by Member Villa, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief as requested under Appeal No. 4174 in the Matter of THOMAS PALMER and JOAN C. GIBBS in this re-adjustment of lot lines for two substandard parcels, shown as Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 on the survey map prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. dated February 23, 1994. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Doyen, Goehringer, Dinizio, Wilton and Villa. This resolution was duly adopted. Ik / GERARD P. GO HRING'ER / CHAIRMAN I~rirn STATE OF NE% )RK) I)O JMM ) SS: ~MI~MIgt9MYaWs~ti! '#w OF SUFFOLK) Law, apublic hearing will be held by M TY the Southold Town Planning Board. Of Mattituck, in at the Town Hall. Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she the 13th day of June, 1994 on the question of the following: is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a 7:30 P.M. Final public hearing for Weekly Newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the proposed minor subdivision for Frances B. Rauch and R. Stewart the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and Rauch, on Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of State of New York, and that the Notice of which New York. Suffolk County Tax Map the annezed is a printed copy, has been regular- Number 1000-9-9-22. The. property is bordered on the ly published in said Newspaper once each week north by land now or formerly - for weeks s essirnely, r pmmencing on north d ; on the east by. Hay Harn- Qrs. bor; on the southeast by land now or the day of 19 formerly of Gads; on the south by land now or. formerly of Doherty, by land now or formerly of Haase, by CHRISTINA VOLINSKI land now or formerly of Faulkner. by UMM Pu~ St~~Now Ybfk -i land now or formerly of Evans, s, and wafid& 14 k6o by land now formerly of Miller, on MOYS111Nf1 9V Principal Clerk food the west by land now or Formerly of Y Wood, by land now or formerly of ~I . I:itch, and by land now or formerly of May; and on the northwest by land 14 now or formerly of May, by land now or formerly of Hickey and by land Sworn O re me 11 new or formerly of Wilmerding. day O 19 7:35 P.M. Final public hearing for the proposed lot line change for Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs, in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. State of. New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000.123-4-4 & 5. The property is bordered on the northeast by Deep Hole Drive; on the east by land now or formerly of Tor- my; onthe southwest by Deep Hole Creek; and on the west by land now or formerly of Villano. 7:40 P.M. Final public hearing for the minor subdivision for Peconic Homes, in Mattituck, Town of Sou Ik, Sute._of an *Up WNe T Nu d art the wtirAr Jirat/Me. ! lttnwor ~Il -sorwaandrow a er y oT iJaWine; on the north- east by land now or formerly of Macari & Alhadeff; on the east by land now or formerly of Guildi & Miller; on the southeast by Laurel puce and by land. now or. formerly of )alder; on the south by land now or formerly of Horton; by land now or ' formerly of Jacoby; and by land now a formerly o San Andres and Salad; and on the west by the open apace for the Fwmveu Associates Subdivision. Any Person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the time and place specified. Dated: June 1, 1994 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD - Richard G. Ward Chairman 7950-ITJu9 LEGAL NOTICE T: operty is bordered on Notice of Public Bearing the noo by Snood Avenue, by land how of 'for erly of NI4~ d8 E6131#EBY Fetnbbrg'aiui ify'lanld now of COUNTY OF SUFFOLK GIls1'thatcsuarn Sec fornnerly'of Davison; tfit the STATE OF NEW YORK ss : tion pf a~ft Town [ avr a northeast by land' now or Pu1te h4!t!fal4 be loeld by formerly' of M'tcari .t the Southold (bxvo P~aztrufig Aihadaff; on the ei* by land 13oerd,fttthc7i ail A4ain now ot'formerlyofduiidi,& Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, Road,Stgttbold Now Ygrkin Miller' on thelouiihetist by, says that she is the Editor, of the said, n oil the 13th day. of you Juttgj994,ofithequestIoaof orTedrap 'ofy~tfer;aaRha TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public the fpilowing• sotttflfnylandno*tffora newspaper printed at Southold, in '113oP.M.Final public hear- lyof fiotton;by`landaow'or Suffolk County; and that the notice ins"r the proposed minor form" pf Jacoby; and by of which the annexed is a printed subdivision for Frances -B, land ntor formerly of San copy, has been published in said Rapch.and R. Stpwar'Rauch , Andres and Sabtnd; and on Traveler-Watchman once each week 7r, ogFiyhers rat lbwn of the wesi by the open spa a for for South6ld,CouniyofSuffolk, the Parmveu Associates /........weeks State of of New York. Suffolk Subdivision. Any person desiring to be succes i y, commencing on the County' 'kx Map Nutlic.°.._, ~el 1000 * 22 heard on the above matter i on shoultf apps at the time anti the or place above specified. to tYt Dated: June i, 1994. on lam' QRUEI$ OF TFIE day Of .C . t on S61UTHOLD TOWN i g yi!~ 0 PLANNHVG 90ARD r r - Richard ~i. Ward, r fMmeC+. Chairman ly ltd porn or IX-6/9/94(3) fortdd3 I (IJ i4nd nwtEb~" ~y Qt ufkner; by # oa fotaierly of Ei°[ I*ad now, or ot Sworn to before me on this y ...day of w1w or former- ly 1i and by. land now or, of May; And on 19 the i rtl?tJesY by land now or • • • • ^ k...... • , / font Wy of141ay, by land.how of "stly 8 4ickey pnd by ?tow 'or formerly of ~kt Float public hear- ing of ill _ X ~ ~r . I~foi, Notary Public trill t n , authol8, BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER Gbq of`§ttffolk, State of NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New Ywk Nedi~btk"= County No.4806846 Taieta~? 14umber Qualified in Suffolk Cot" 10 4 44 )k Commission Expires E13 t/95< is bordered oil the 'f Defy- Dole etrt theku 9t bylaltd pow 'Or,f r* df' bi~vn on the southiiikst by tee p ko' le Creek attd qi, rite west.by and D [5 f p R noa+ ~l° fbrnti~tly of Vlliapo. ~ l5 R `iSM:'ii(ualplibnc'hear- ~ Ur,' ing *4ofor dte`mfnbr subdivision 13 for F~bjfi i homes, In Mat- 9 tituck, 004rt or' Snothold, t county of ,Suffolk, State of SOUFf1{ji D 1G" Wii^-~ NeWork."5uffolk County PLANN6G BOARD Tax' 1(1'3'p Number 1000-121-3-7.1. 46OUNTY OF SUFFOLK • PD RK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING STEPHEN M. JONES. A.I.C.P. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING June 3, 1994 Richard Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Plat Name: Minor Subdivision - Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs Tax Map No.: 1000-123-4-4 & 5 SCDP File No.: S-SD-94-05 Dear Mr. Ward: Pursuant to the requirements of Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the above captioned proposed final plat which has been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination; however, this shall not be construed that the Commission has either approved or disapproved this particular plat. Very truly yours, Stephen M. Jones Director of Planning S/s Frank Dowling, Principal Planner Subdivision Review Division FD:mb jUN 6.1994 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD H. LEE DENNISON BUILDING ¦ VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY ¦ HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788 ¦ 15161 853-5192 FAX (516) 853-4044 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant May 23, 1994 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed lot line change for Thomas A. Palmer & Joan C. Gibbs SCTM#: 1000-123-4-4&5 Location: Mattituck SEQR Status: Type 1 ( ) Unlisted ( X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No ( X) Description of Action: The proposed lot line change is to subtract 9,300 square feet from a 21,500 square foot parcel and add it to an 1,900 square foot parcel. Page 2 Negative Declaration - Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs Reasons Supporting This Determination: This project involves a lot line change which will result in two lots both with existing houses; thus the change will not be a more intensive use of the land. The area is zoned for residential use, thus the project conforms to existing zoning. An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions, and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required relevant permits. For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Langdon Marsh , DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. of Health Building Dept. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant Southold Town Planning Board 3 June 13, 1994 Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Ward: The next public hearing, 7:35 p.m., Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs - This lot line change is to subtract 9,300 square feet from a 21,500 square foot parcel and add it to an 11,900 square foot parcel. SCTM# 1000- 123-4-4 & 5. Is the applicant here, or an agent of the applicant that would like to address the Board? If not, an order to close the hearing? Mr. McDonald: I make a motion to close. Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. McDonald: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to make a further motion that WHEREAS, Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs are the owners of the property known and designated as SCTM# 1000-123-4-4 & 5 located on Deep Hole Drive in Mattituck; and, WHEREAS, this lot line change, to be known as lot line change for Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs is for a lot line change to subtract 9,300 square feet from a 21,500 square foot parcel and add it to a 11,900 square foot parcel. WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on May 23, 1994; and, WHEREAS, a variance was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on May 4, 1994; and Southold Town Planning Board 4 June 13, 1994 WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said lot line change application at Town Hall, Southold, New York on June 13, 1994; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and be it therefore, RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated February 23, 1994 and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to fulfillment of the following condition. This condition must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution. 1. The filing of new deeds pertaining to the merger of the 9,300 square feet from the 21,500 square foot parcel SCTM# 1000-123-4-4 with the 11,900 square foot parcel SCTM# 1000-123-4-5. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Mr. Ward: All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Ward: The, next order of business, 7:40 p.m. for Peconic Homes - This minor subdivisio ' for 2 lots on 45.9741 acres located on the south side of Sound Ave.; 1917 fe east of Farmveu Road in"ttituck. SCTM# 1000-121- 3-7.1. Is the owner her or the agent who ~Id like to address the Board? At this point, is anybody he that woul Ke to address the Board on this application. Would you please your name for the record? Barbara Sayer: I'm a neigh r. I live Laurel Lake Road (inaudible). What I want to give you now is etter that the La el Lake Property Owners Association wrote tox'r. Gaffney, the County ecutive, and it mentions Southold Town B rd and six parcels and the qu r percent sales tax, and so forth, and I ju wanted to submit this for your record this matter. Mr. War Alright, thank you very much. Is there anybody else that would like to ad ess the Board on this particular application? If not, I think we're all in ord r to close the hearing? rl J v ) h PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS v _JI Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 1 r P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Berard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Richard G. Ward, Chairman RE: Planning Board comments on actions before the Board of Appeals DATE: May 4, 1994 Following are the Boards comments on actions before your Board: Appl. No. 4232 - Thomas Palmer and Joan Gibbs The Board has no objections to this lot line change as no new lots will be created. Appl. No. 4231 & 4230SE - Alex and Afrodite Boukas The Board has no objection to this proposed site plan as it is the intention of the code to permit this use in this zone by Special Exception. Appl. No. 4203SE - Robert E. Bidwell The Board is in general agreement with the proposed site plan subject to the applicant's satisfaction of details. Appl. No. 4237 Robert Pelligrini The Board has no objection to the proposed kitchen for private use. An amended floor plan should be submitted to this Board for the record file. Appl. No 4227 - William Gasser Since the security fence will partly obscure the sign from public view, the Board has no objections to the variance request. The Board recommends that the sign not be lighted. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS = Richard G. Ward, chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Rond Bennett Orlowski, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Pax (516) 765 -1823 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SO=OLD l$ 19 /Lf RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Lal°L/~~Cf/ANG~ Fo T/~ahgs /34~ Q ira~9~/ C C;/-73&s VZ " D/r;,d_m.9T~7T7cK rRequested Action: 7" :5 L vC.C/lf,05 ~fl/1N Is T Su/StRroa! 9, 3 ~o 3y~lA~ FEG/ Fri, A 2~ v ,era h~u r-np SEQRA Classification: (X) Type I C ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: z (516)38 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below). Comments : Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sin rely, Richard G. Ward Chairman CC: Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Building'Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services NYSDEC - Albany • ers ion * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald _ Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 19, 1994 Thomas A. Palmer P.O. Box 218 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Lot Line Change for Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs SCTM#•1000-123-4-4&5 Dear Mr. Palmer: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 18, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, start the coordination process on this Type 1 action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Si ere , R 6chard G. Ward Chairman 9 a ,rr ~ ~,FFi PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS' Richard G. Ward, Chairman 2 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ;y tq P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. t Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards r Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ^O: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals From: Richard G. Ward, Chairman klpf' RE: Proposed Lot Line Change for Thomas A. Palmer and Joan C. Gibbs Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-123-4-4 & 5 DATE: April 12, 1994 This is in reference to your request for Planning Board comments on the above referenced Lot Line Change. ordinarily the Board would not be in favor of a lot line change that will result in the creation of two unequal lots. However, due to the unique circumstances, ie. the location of the garage, the Board is in favor of this application. cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector In Charge Sl~r;rlLe SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: 312-519 p SENDER: T hQYY1ClS IQ~YYP~ SUBJECT: L - L - CJia/Kosk, SCTM#: X23 L -~+S COMMENTS: ~PP~• J (2e 0 ~~I~t~ c,hecAc i rl cQ ra w e,L i f ~~•ir1 f[ eI x ~ •••p •rum c c ii i•[ Y.t z f [ •o cif r .•.[u arz f ~>ti Yt•1 ~f • x a 10 ' 1. W~ i• II1 • ~Ypa a SS a [~N.~• a n .r Y[ Yc M L .it x .'•or.wu ~ t p., x I- • ' a V W 12 o pP \ V W \ sa s¢ w w •a.m T Y yi F • \ l•\ t / .o \i~t NI. Y^Odla I .W 1w\ u na{ n UAb w? nt4 Oit" pU~ ~ 9 w.u .tee"p"~f vEDpM ' sp A T ewa ep[ i I•p•.d © rR..« SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK _ u<rw•ro .Po _ Real Properly Tax Service Agency 1 23 - O Co.x r 6.1 moro 1000 u R'rvh•ad, L 1, N.. Y.,l -A0 17