The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-123.-1-1PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 May 12, 1993 John Duell 1960 Country Club Drive Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed site plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning District: Light Industrial (LI) and Low Density Residential (R-80) SCTM~ IO~0-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Duell: The Planning Board has reviewed your proposal for a phased development of the site plan for the above mentioned project. The Board is aware that the proposed hanger, as the Suffolk County Department of Health Services had indicated on the plan, does not require Health approval if the other buildings are removed from the plan or both projects are accomplished in phases. The Board does not approve of this proposal as the entire site must meet Health and fire District requirements. If you have any questions, or require further information. please contact this office. Sincerely, Chairman cc: Jay wickham, Airport Manager Curtis Horton, Senior Building Inspector ~M-006 (~. 6/89) H.D. Ref. No. T.M. D~signation Notice NO... Bureau of WastewaterManag~ment Suffolk County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 516-548-3312 · '' - ' ~ Article VI & Article VII Zone ~ ~./or Villa~ Zo. in~ ~%t~'~. ~ Completed Application.Fozm ~-004~~ ~ ] ~lic Water/~r Avail~ility ~tter ~~ ~te~ohL.- '.~ . . ,~ ] ~SD~ ~tl~ Pe~t or Wai~r ~PDES Fo~ ~ ~ D ' ,, ~.~~ PI~ ~ ]~ x t1" F ] Res~icti~ C~s: ~her ] ~trificatio~t ~l~on ~[or~ng/S~l~g Pl~ (8 1/2" x 11") ] R~ ~ ~te~~ ~~ ~ ~/~ ~z~ ~ ~ p~ ,. otb ~tes ~d ~ ~scri~ , , . ," [ j e~ ~ ~/~al~ '[ r ,P --~'~,/ ~/~t Size ; , ~J- '--- ~ Indus~ial Stat~nt/Si~t~--~ ~ss ~1~ ~ ~ ~-=~ .... ~, ~ ~ ~llo~/~y/Ac~ S~ge Dlsch~u ~1 S~face waters Wi~n 300' ~ ~ ] ~.u~s~sa~ ~s~ Calculatxons Private .......... / L ~ ~u=imc~ent ~trification ~ ~11 ~talls ~ ~aL{~n ~ . . ~ , ~ . , tails '~i-~--: ...... ~- -_~ ~__ -~- ~ t ~ ~ ~-~ ;,%L~z,'S~.~ Li~ ..... m-- - Wlt~ 150 of P~y 'S~i ~tor~g ~11 ~il ~d ~ation [ ] Capi~l Costs of S~i~ ~t~ or Capital Cost of ~nitrification ~titude ~ ~ngitude ~scription [ ] ~ration ~ ~te~e Info~tion Project does not conform to Department standards. See Notice of Non-Confon~ance. Co~nts: . -+ -, . /, . -~ / . : .... .., ~+., ,..</ ......... ..,.,., / .' ..... . '~-.. ,3 o, ,./.<~ , -:,- ~' .-.5 ~. :,.{ Plan ~vxew ~s being coordinated with the following. Approval cannot be granted without thei~ ~d pe~t issuance w~e _r~ a~licable. ?,:,,..= ', '.-'L._~. ,~ [ ] ~ology [ ] DPW £ ~ Oil Tanks ] Art. XII Wat.~e~r Quality~[ / SITE PLAN Presub mission conference (within 30 days of written request) Complete application received (within 4 months of presub, conference) Application reviewed at work session (within t 0 days of receipt) Applicant advised of necessary revisions' (within 30 days of review) Revised submission received Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination REFERRED TO: Zoning Board of Appeals (written comments within 60 days of request) Board of Trustees /A3'ffilding Department (certification) Suffolk County Department of Planning Department of Transportation -State Department of Transportation - County ~Fuffolk County Dept. of Health ire COmmissioners RECEIVED: Draft Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covenants and Restrictions Landscape plan Lighting plan Curb Cut approval t///Healtb, approval Drainage plan v/~eviewed by Engineer Sent: · Received: I°l I Approval of site plan -with conditions Endorsement of sire'plan Certificate of Occupancy in}pection One year review Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 ~D APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Application 6-02-92 Filing FeeDate Rec'd New Use Change of Use Re-Use Extension of Existing Use Revision of an Approved Site Plan (Date of Approval other Specify ****************** X Name of Business or site Mattituck Airport Location of Site Airway Drive~ Mattituck, NY Address of Site, if available Airway Drive~ Mattituck~ NY Name o£ Applicant Jay P. Nickham Address of Applicant Airway Drive, Mattituck, NY Telephone 516-298-8330 Person to be responsible for Construction Jay P. Wickham Telephone 516-298-8330 Applicant's interest in site-check one: Owner of Land Owner Under contract to purchasc Owner of-Fee Title to Land J.p. Wickham Telephone Address 65 25626 Site Plans Prepared by R. VanTuyl License No. Address Greenpor t, NY Telephonc 516-477-0170 Total Land Area of Site Existing Use of Site Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) Sq. Ft. Zone District L.;. Proposed Use of site--~ sqft. ~9~d s~ sqft. ~ s. ~8.~ DatUm(Specify)U.S.G-S- ~ other Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the suffolk ( Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APl OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOARD. 14-16-2 (2/87) -- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQ~ Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner/whether a projec or action may be significant· The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determin: significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmenta analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affect n! the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatio. process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introc[uction of information to fit a project or action Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3~ Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provide: guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is id;ntified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not thc impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information ~'ecorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead ag~y~t h a t: ~ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. r'l B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant · effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* -/" [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Na,rne of Action Name of Lead Agency : _. __ Print or~pe Name o.~efponsible Officer in Lead A~enc¥ Title of Respons,ble Officer ~ Si~t~e o~Re~nsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(It different from responsibJeofficer) Dale ! PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to thb~e questions will be conside~ as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additior information you belieYe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invot new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spec~ each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (Inctude Street Address, Municipality and County) NAME OF APPLICAN.T~SPONS,OR ADDRESS CITY/PO BUSINESS TELEPHONE I STATE ZIP CODE BUSINESS TELEPHONE I STATE ZIP CODE Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: i-lUrban ~lndustrial [~Commercial I-IForest f-lAgriculture [Z]Other 2. Total acreage of project area: I~. I ± acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY Meadow or Brushtand (Non-agricultural) Forested o Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland IFreshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of £CL) o acres Water Surface Area : Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces 4.o acres Other(Indicate type) ~1~.¢,~ ~ ~'¢_E~ ,C~c~-~. ~]Residentia[ (suburban) C]Rural (non-farn AFTER COMPLETION C) O O O -I."~ acres 3. What is predominant so_i~e(s) on prolect site? _~o~'otu. a'. Soil drainage: [3gNell drained /oo % of site ' ~Moderately well drained % of site E3Poorly drained % of site ~v/~' If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NY Land Classification System? _ acres. (See ~ NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~]Yes a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet} 2 S. Approximate percenta ,posed project site With slopes: r"]0'1°% ~" % E]10-15% O15% or greater . ~ - % 6. IS project substantially contiguous to, or coma' a building, Registers of Historic Places? f-lYes ~ site, or district, listed on the State or the Natio, 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? fi]Yes 8. What is the depth of the water table? _~J/~' {in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aqu fer? []Yes 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [Yes ~ . 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangere 0-)Yes ~o According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique .or-unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formation fi]Yes ~ Describe 13. Is the project site p_r?sently used by the Community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area I-lYes E~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site~lude scenic views known to be important to the community? C1Yes 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River t'o w~hi'ch it is tributary ~ 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name 17. Is the site served by~xisting public ut lities? [~es--' [No b. Size (In acres) a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow COnnect on? ~ b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? fi]Yes 18. ~No Is the site located in an agricultural~stfiCt certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2S-AA, Section 303 and 304? fi]Yes E~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous t ' ,~tic of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 Fiyes us tol~ al Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~]Yes B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project Sponsor ~_~..~. ~_ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: _ -- acres initially; O .~,~ acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped '-[o? acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ~V,,//~ (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~----~-; r - g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour- ~ , /,,,t_ P Oposea ~1o~_.._ h. If resident al' ~,~.m~, .... .~ , · L . ~ (Upon Comple on of project)~ One Family Two Family Initially Multiple Family Condominium Ultimately -, i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; ~ width; J. Linear feet of frontage along a pubfic thoroughfare project will OCcupy s.~ ~u/~)-- ft. 3 length. 2. How much natural ~,~aterialtLe., rock, earth, etc.) will be remo ed from the site? ,AD~,J~_~ ,tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be rec a med? I-]Yes I-1No [~N ~ a. If yes, for wt~at intend~,~ purpose is the site being recla ned? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes []No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] es []No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) wi I be removed from site? ~'~'~ 5. Will any mature fo~e~ ~over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? E]Yes E~b~o 6. If single phase proiect: Anticipated period of construction ,~ months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated / (numberl b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I I~'/~1 month 1~--/~2 year, [including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase ~-~/y'~ month ~/~ year. d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? []Yes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? []Yes 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this proiect 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? I-lyes E~o If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes [2~N0 a. If yes. indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? []Yes E3No Type 14. Will surface are)~ of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposa[? Explain E3Yes E3No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? []Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? []Yes E~r'No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? []Yes I~No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain l~Yes ~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. I~ yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~Y'~s []Yes [~No tons/month. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~Yes [~No' 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? []Yes 21. Will proiect result in an increase in energy use? I~Yes [~oNo If yes , indicate type(s) ! 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~%/),~r gallons/day 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~3Yes If Yes, explain gallons/minute. 4 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board I-lyes City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes I~No City, Town Zoning Board ~Yes ONo City, County Health Department f~Yes I--INo Other Local Agencies I'~Yes IiNo Other Regional Agencies IiYes ~-~No State Agencies fi'lyes Federal Agencies E~Yes IiNo Submittal Type Date C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~ r-INo If ~.'di/cate decision required: L~zoning amendment f-lzoning variance i-lspecial use permit Ii-]subdivision f-lsite plan- I-lnew/revision of master plan E]resource management plan [-'[other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted Focal land use plans? [~es 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a lA mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? ~es'~' 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? '/~/ ~J~ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I-lYes 11. Will the proposed action create a-de~mand for any community provided services (recreation, education, fire protection)? Ii-lYes a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to han.dle projected demand? I-lYes IiNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? I-lYes · a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Ii-lYes Ii-No. D. Informational Details " Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to miti avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true lo the best of my knowledge. / / Iftheact nn~slrr/he o,~astalArea, and you are a state agency, c':~leet--r~astalAssessment Form with this assessment, before pro~ 5 APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Jay P. Wickham being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at Airway Drive, Mattituck, NY in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above property, or that he is the President of the Mattituck Airbase, Inc. (Title) (Specify whether Partnership which is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. Sworn to before me this (Notary Public) ~OTARY PUBLIC, State o! New Yo~ No. 4718148 (~ualified in Suftolk County ~.~ ~ ~m~m~. ~u~pif~ Jura 30. ~ (Owner) Signed ( Pa r t n~r~o r p/r ~O~f ic e r and Title) 14-16-2 (2/871-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SE(, Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting. the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. L DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part2 []:]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORM,~ ON Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered.¢,.~ as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona!'~. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full FAF will be dependent on, information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ) ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF OWNER (If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ) ADDRESS CiTY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas, 1. Present land use: [-1Urban [53fndustrial I-]Forest F-IAgricuJture 2. Total acreage of project area: ~', 8 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area . acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other pave(J surfaces '~° ~' acres ~ ~ acres Other (Indicate type) ~'~ ~'$ ~, O acres /o ~] acres I-ICommercial I-IOther E3Residential (suburban) [~Rural (non-farm) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? v'¢~/'~,,/,t &.~,~,t.4,. a. Soil drainage: E~ell drained % of site []Moderately well drained % of site []Poorly drained % of site b, If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYSz_: Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~lYes [~No a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of propoOroject site with slopes: [~(~]10% []10-15% ~ _ % r~15% or greater ! 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? i-Wes (No ~'7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? E3Yes i~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? . (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [Yes (No 10. Do hunting, fishin~ or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [Yes []No 11. Does proiect site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered;~ [Yes (No According to ' Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) []Yes DNo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? []Yes DNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? f~Yes I~No · 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? DYes I~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? DYes I~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~]Yes (No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~]Yes []No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I~Yes DNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes (No B. Project Description 1, Physical dimensions and scale of project (fiji in dimensions as appropriate) a., Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor ~'.~.5' ~ b. Project acreage to be developed: __o. ~: acres initially; O. ~. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped ~. 6 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: , (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed '~ %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~" ~ ; proposed ~1'~1~ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially Ultimately __ i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 1~' height; ~ ·width; i. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 3 a'cres. acres ultimately. Condominium / ~'~' length. · ft. 2. How much natural material ( took, earth, etc) ~,~,ill be removed from 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? []Yes E~No ~N/A a If yes, for what intend .; purpose is the site being reclaimed? --- b. will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes L~No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ...... a(r(s ~i W any mature forest (over 100 years old/ or other locally-important vegetation be removed bv this ~roject? [2]Yes E~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month __ c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [~Yes E~No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? E]Yes ~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction -- ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this prolect __ -- 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [~Yes ~No 11 yes, explain year, (i ]din~ demolition) 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes [~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount __ b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes C]No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? !~:Yes [~N(~ Explain ~3No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [~Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~]Yes [~No c. If yes, give name __; location d. Will any wastes .ot go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ii,Yes ~No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? . b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? _ 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~Yes E3Yes [2~No tons/month years. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? E~Yes E3No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient 0oise levels?~Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~Yes E3'No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity _ 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day 24 Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? E~Yes If Yes, explain __ gailons/'minute 4 25. A'pprovals Required: City, Town, Village Board ~Y~es []No City, Town, Village Planning Board [~Yes City, Town Zoning Board []Yes City, County Health Department []Yes [~1~o Other Local Agencies [Yes ~No Other Regional Agencies E3Yes State Agencies []Yes ~No Federal Agencies []Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information × I. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? I~Yes ~No · If Yes, indicate decision required: []zoning amendment [zoning variance f~special use permit [-Isubdivision [~site plan [new/revision of master plan []resource management plan []other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Submittal Date 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use p ans~ [Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a lA mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 7¼ mi[e? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? [Yes 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? []-]Yes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ~lYes [No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [Yes I~No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present evels.~ ~Ye~, E~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [Yes [~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided abow~ is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Date Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a stale agency, complete lhe Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 General Information (Read Car flu i · In completing the form the r,vie'' dr:u d h( ~ · identifying that an impact vdll b{ I'~ertialyl le (hiLl ~r ; i3~S ~ it' asks that it be looked at furd~er for most situations. But. for any s ~e(ifi: prop: · The impacts of each pro~ect, on ea(h site, in , u:;, Io::alih,, ,,'ill wr' [h~ er:~ :, f( ~ ~ ~ples a~e ~lRistratwe and · In identifying impacts, consider ongterm, short term and cumlaN~e eHec I.il~udions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PAR1 2. An*,*er Yes if there ~il he any mm~(t b. Maybe answers should be considered is Yes answe~ c. If answermgYes to a question then check th~ appropriate ~ox((olumn 1 e,r 2) l(, indi(ate the potemlal size oi th~' impact If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example prowded, check column 2 If mH~ac~ wd1 occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1 d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact ti~en consider the impact e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3 A No response indicates that such a reduction m not possiblu This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND I Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? · E]NO E]YES £xamples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year · Construction or expansion of a sanitary lanclfil[ ·Construction in a designated floodway. ·Other impacts 2 Will there he an effect t~ . ,W u;;,que or unusual land forms found on the site? (ie, cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)L~NO ~YES · Specific land forms: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact [1 Gan Impact Be Mitigated By ! Project Change E]Yes t.,No ~Ye~ C IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL E2YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of ma.terial from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? I~NO [YES ExamCes that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? []NO [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge perm.it. · Proposed Action ~'equires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveye I off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likelv cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses i~' areas without water and/or sewer services, · Proposed Action locates comrnercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts:_ 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? [=]NO [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 W 2 3 Small to Potentia ,Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes I~INo [] [] []Yes dNo [] [] ~]Yes ~N~i [] [] []Yes [] [] []Yes [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~o ~ ~ ~Yes dNo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Y~, ~No ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7 will proposed action affect air quality? [~NO ~Y[S Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hoLir · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? E3NO [ZIYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes, · Other impacts:__ 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non threatened or non-endangered species? E~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wi[dhfe species · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ~]NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc) 8 Impact hni ~'ct Project Shange i J ,t! _JNo -:]Yes ~No EYes E]No JYes L~Yes ~No ~] Yes L~No i ~Yes ~'~Yes ~No Yes [~ No I~Yes · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. ' The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain hnes, outlet ditches strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farrr field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? [~NO J~YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which wdl eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological mportance;~ r~NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action wdJ occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ~]NO [3YES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: 9 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] E3Yes [] [] []Yes [~o [] UYe Q U ~ ~ ~Yes ~o ~ ~ ~Yes ~No Ves ~ ~ ~Yes ~'No ~ ~ ~Yes ~o ~ ~ ~Yes ~o IMPACT ON 1 ~ANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? [~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? E~NO E~Yii5 Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be obiectionable odors, no~se, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? l~NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day) · Proposed Action wil] produce operating noise exceeding the [oca[ ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts:_ IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? []NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (ie. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste · Other impacts: 10 Small to Moderate Impact E3 Potentiai C~n impact Be [_a~ ge Mitiqated By Impact P~oiect Change IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? E3NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · ]'be municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services {e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future proiects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: Small to Potentia, Moderate Large Impact Impact Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change [~Yes [~No [Yes [~No [~Yes [No [~]Yes [~No [~Yes I--)No [~]Yes ~]No []Yes [~No [~Yes [~]No I-lYes [~]No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental mpactsZ r~NO [~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s} may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Degcribe(if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is imporlanl. To answer the question Of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibiJity, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. {Continue on attachments) 11 DESCRIPTION OF EXI;.,,ING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question I, check those wh ch generally describe the -;mr~.~unding environment, Within Essentially undeveloped ~ ' Forested Agricultural r . Suburban residential industrial Commercial Urban River, Lake, Pond Cliffs, Overlooks Designated Open Space [_.~ · =Jar ~ountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *V~ mile [~Yes [~No *1 miles [~] Yes ~No *2 miles [~Yes ~No *3 miles [~Yes ~No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREGUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work Involved in recreational activities Routine travel by residents [] At a residence [] ~ ~-] At worksite [] Other [] TO D Under contract J.P. Wickham Telephone to purchase APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Application ll-28-90Filing Fee Date Rec'd New Use Change of Use Re-Use Extension of Existing Use Revision of an Approved Site Plan (Date of Approval Other Specify Name of Business or Site Mattituck A/rDort Location of Site A/rwav Drive. Mattituc~, NY Address of Site, if available A/rwav Drive. Mattituck. NY Name of Applicant Jay P. Wickham - Address of Applicant A/rwa~Mattituck~NY Telephone 516-298-8330 Person to be responsible for Construction Jay P. Wickham Telephone 516-298-8330 Applicant's interest in site-check one: Owner of Land Owner Owner of Fee Title to Land Address X Site Plans Prepared by Address Greenpor t, NY R. VanTuyl License No. Telephone 65 25626 516-477-0170 Total Land Area of Site 12.1± Sq. Ft. Zone Districtli~t industrial Existing Use of Site Airport Gross Floor Area of Existing Structur~r~pOsed Use of Sites~e Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structur~ sqft. 43,-~ sqft. Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) sqft.' 4,380 sqft. Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) Datllm(Specify)U.S.G.S ' ' ' Other Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOARD. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Jay P. Wickham being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at Airwav Drive. Mattit.~k in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above property, or that he is the President of the ~a~t~tuak Airnnrt (Title) (Specify whether Partnership which is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. Signed ~, ~__~' ~_~l ~ , ( Owner ) Sworn to before me this 28th ~ day of Nov. 19 90 ~TARY PUBLIC, ~te ol New Y~ . ~ k / . ~.~451~Su~u~ ~ S~gned ~~ · . ..... ~~~~ (Partne~r ~orpbf~te Officer.and 14-16-2 (2/87]-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A SEQR State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically ~xpert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introc[uction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3~ Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or actio'n. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE;-Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information ~ecorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead age. that: ~ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which wiil not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* / [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration wiU be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Print o~pe Name,~L~efponsib~e Officer in Lead Agency C'" Sign~atu~re o/Res~nsible Officer in Lead Agency Na?e of Action Name of Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer / Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date ! -- ART 1"-PROJECT INFORMATION '~. Prepared by Project Sponsor ~, NOTICE: This dOCUment is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant on the environment. Please Complete t entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to th~s'e questions will be consid as part of the application for approval anhc~ may be subject to further verification and pub,ic review· Provide any addi~i. information you believe w I be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that Completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available new studies, research or investigation· If information requiring such additional wore is unavailable, so indicate and spe each instance· and will not inv, NAME OF LOCATION OF ACTION {Include Street Address NAME OF APPLI ADDRESS CJTYIPO NAME OF OWNER (If different) ADDRESS STATE ZIP CODE BUSINESS TELEPHONE DESCRI.T~ON OF ACTION ~j STFx-~ C-~' I O~ STATE ZIP CODE Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [-IUrban I~lndustrial f-iCommerciaI ~Residential'(SUburban) [~]Rural (non-farm /"IF°rest i-/Agriculture [~Other ' · - , 2. Total acreage of project area: '-'---J-~--~-~-~ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREACE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION: Forested _ _ o~ - acres -- ~ acres __ o . acres 0 Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) ~ o acres ~-~ ~ acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) o-- ~ O :" ' acres Water Surface Area : -- -- - acres O Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) __ __ o ~ acres O Roads. buddings and other paved Surfaces' -- -- ~ acres O Other (Indicate type) G~:A~ s "~ .E~'. ~l~T~.. _ ~.O~ acres ~ acres .. ,4 ,~ acres 3. What is predominant soil t,,,,~r~ -- · ~ ~' ~ acres -[.~.~__~ - · . ---~-[~ un project Site? --~2_J~(I. LeAr,4 - acres en ~ % of xite ~]., - ~ C]Poorly drained MOaerately well drained · any agricultural la ~s ~ ed, how ma y ores of sod are classd{ed within soil group 1 ' Land Classd~cat~on S stem~ acresT(S~e 1 NYCRR 370) through 4 of the NY! 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~]Yes a. What is depth to bedrock? __ ~ ~ (in feet) S. Approximate percentage of prc project site with slopes: [0-10% ('~111~ % f-110-15%., ~ % I~15% or greater I _ % 6. IS project substantially contiguous to, or ~ a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? I-lYes ~'~o : , . 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of' National Natural Landmarks~ I-Iyes 8. What is the depth of the water table? ~k.)/t~ {in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, pr ncipal or sole source aquifer? I-lyes 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [Yes 11. Does project site contaiff any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered;~ [l-lYes ~o According to Identify each species 12· Are there any unique or-unusual land forms on the project site? Ci.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) E~o Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? [l-lYes E~N~ If yes, explain 14. Does the present site~.L~fude scenic views known to be important to the community? E~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to w/hich it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by'~xisting public utilities? e[~Y~s- ~INo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? e[~T~s b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow Connection? I~Yes ~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural~i~tfict certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? I-lyes I~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous t~ritical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 i-lYes 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fi(I in dimensions as appropriate) · a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project Sponsor __'~,~ _~ acres· · b. Project acreage to be developed: _ o.~. acres initially; .__0 .~ .2:- ,~ c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped __"1'.'~ acres acres ultimately. d. Length of project, in miles: n//~ (If a~pro~riate) ' e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed ~,~ %, f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ?-'~--- ' proposed lDO g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~LJ/r~ ~ (upon corn-le~-''- -~ '. b. If residential: Number and type of housing units: k.,~/ p bon or pro~ect)? One Family Two Family Initially Multiple Family Condominium -. Ultimately i. Dimensions ~in feet) of largest proposed structure .___Jl~ __ height; __'~o_.~__~ width; t"~O' length. j. Linear feet of fro.ntage along a public thoroughfare project will OCcupy is? .. ~v/i~ ft. 3 2. How much natural material ~'~ : 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed;~ earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? ~ tons/cubic a. If yes, for What intend~ ~__ O.Yes. ONo ~/A -- ~u~pose ~s the S~te being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpi ed for reda c. Will Upper suL . , marion? m,, .. usou De Stockpiled · ~res ~]No ~ 4. now man, ....... ,or reclamation? OYes ' OYes y .~-~e~ or Vegetation [trees, shrubs, ground COVers) will be re from Site? I~No years O/d) or other locally-important Vegetation be removed by this proiect? cres. 6. If Single phase project: Anticipated 7. If multi-phased: period of Construction ~ months, [including demolition). a. Total number of Phases anticipated ~ [.number). b. Anticipated date of COmmencement phase 1 ~ month c. ApProximate completion date of final phase ~ month ~ Year, ['including demolition). d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on SUbsequent phases?OYes~No ~ 8. Will blasting OCCur during Construct/on? OYes ~ Year· · 9. NUmber of jobs generated: during Construction ~1~o - 10. Number of jobs eliminated by th s ro /-'~'-"----~--; after pro ect s co , 11. Will project require relocation oj p ject ~. mple,e ~ ....... . or any prolects or facilities? OYes -- / 12. Is s~s0osa/ h~,,~ ..... '-~' ~ L_~l~o If yes, explain , ~pOsal involved? ~,, ~ ,~. u yes, indicate t"- - ~u' LJYes r~e or waste ['SeWage, Industrial, et~-.)' ~nd amount b Name of r body Is subsurface I'qu~d waste d Sposal involved? OYes 14. Will Surface ar,~// of an ex,st,ng Water body Increase or decrease~°~ EXplal.n . Y proposal? OYes 16. Will the project generate solid Waste? [~Yes a. If yes, what is the amount per month '. b. If yes, will an existing solid Waste facility be used? c. If yes, give name l~Yes ONo d. Will any wastes not go into a g isposa/system or into sew~; location e. If Yes, explain ~ a sanitary landf II;~ OYes ONo 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, What is the anticipated rate of disposal? ' OYes b. I{ yes, what is the anticipated Site fe~ ---'------------- tons/month. ~ years. _,. 18. Will proiect use herbicides or pesticides? Oy,(~s ~ 19. Will project routinely produce odors emote than One hour per day)? OYes 20 Will pro!ect produ e op Ir yes , Indicate type[s) =.ergy use? ~¥es ~ · OYes N~/o 22. If Water Supply s from wells i,~,~;~_. ~o . . 23. Total antici ~, indicate pumping Capacity ~ pared water usage per day r~/J~r "- gallons/minute. ~ gallons/day. 24. Does proiect involve Local, State or Federal funding~ OYes If Yes, explain ~ . 2S. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies C]Yes C]No E~Yes r-INo ~Yes E]No fqYes [No [:]Yes [-INo [:]Yes []No F'Wes [:]No [:Yes F'INo Type Submittal Date C. Zoning and Planning Information -- 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning dec sion? ~ [:No If ,~.~.'di/cate decision required: m'qzoning amendment I:]zoning variance ~'lspecial use permit i-lsubdivision [:]site plan- l'~new/revision of master plan [::]resource management plan I-lother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? L.'T t~OC~l ~ 3. What is the m~tent)al develop~ment of the s~te if developed as permitted by the nresent 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ._~ $. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning~ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [~es linc 7. What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? [~es C]Nc 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? ~L~/ ~ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? _ 10.~Will proposed action require any authorization{s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 11. Will the proposed action create?~ d&~nand for any Community provided services {recreation, education, police, fire protect on)? i-lYes ~]~/o a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? []-]Yes C]No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~o . a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes D. Informational Details .' Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your proiect. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures ~vhich you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification certify that the informatio~ provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Iflheact n~islrr/h, ~asta~ Area, and you are a stale agencY, c~m~e~e the C~as~a~ Assessment Form before proceeding wilb Ibis assessment. 5 STATE CF NE%V YORI~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IN ~ BIATTER OF TI-IE PETITION OF RECEIVED DEC;. 1_ ? 'Iggl Southol,'l 'r ..... PETITION FOR A Ci{A-NGE, AIODI/~ICATION OR ABIENDBIE~NT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDL~I- AINCE OF TI-IE TO%VN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLIf COUNTY, N~E%V YORK. TO TI{E TOWN BOARD OF TI{E TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: L Z, ........~l,..P.~..~ticJdaa~] ................................ , residin~ at .6.ir.~ay....D..~i.¥.~.,...~.~L~t.u¢.L~..y... (tr~sert name of petitioner) Suffolk County, Ne%v York, the undersigned, am the o'~vner of certhin real property situated at M attituck Airport ...................................................... and more particularly bounded and described as follows: Description: Proposed change of Zone, R-80 to II, Mattituck, A/rport Beginning at a point on the southerly line of Airway Drive, being;~the following two courses from New Suffolk Avenue: 1) S.4°09'10"W.-581.69 feet; thence 2) S.50o23'30"E.-358.38 feet to said point of beginning; running thence the following four courses: 1) S.11°31'30"W.-351.84 feet; thence 2) N. 70°40'50"W.-790.26 feet~ thence 3) N. 6°ll'10"E.-185.0 feet; thence 4) S.82°47'50"E.-802.45 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 4.865 acres. 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the To%vn of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including the Building Zone l%{aps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: TO extend the Southernmost boundary Jibe of light industrial further South to accomodate the structures (storage hangars). These structures need be built as shown so as not to preclude their original anticipated functional abilities. PLANNING' BO,~RD J /~. )Such request is made for the following reasons: To extend the Southernmost boundary line of light industrial further South to aeeomodate the structures (storage hangars). These structures need be buJJt as shown so as not ~o preclude their original anticipated functional abilities. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, 3. P. Wickham .............................................. , BEING DULl" S%VO]{N, deposes and says that he is the petitJoner in the within action; that be has read the foregoing Petition and knows the contents thereof; that the same is true to .his (her) own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged o~z Jn£ormatJcn and belief, and that as to those matters he believes it to be true, Sworn to before me this 'l'-.~.nl~ay of . October ,, g~ VERONICA C. TABOR~ ....... , ........ ~ NOTARY PUBUC, ~te 0f Ne~ Y~ ~ otary Pub~. No. ~5199~ Suffo~ ~un~ ~7~ ~ow~ c~ 4 4 6 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York Phone 516-765-1801 ~--// 19 Southold, New York 11971 ~ Date~ Judith~T. Te~, Town Clerk Cash ~ Check ~ ~ ~-~ iREQU!REMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION ~ i~iSECTION-BLOCK-LOT TAX ~IAP NUMBERS ~ :,[NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER OF RECORD ~ i'!NAME & ADDRESS OF PERSON PREPARING MAP ~,J:.[DATE, NORTH POINT AND WRITTEN & GRAPHIC SCALE "~. [DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY & INFORMATION TO DEFINE BOUNDARIES '~LOCATIONS, NAMES & EXISTING WIDTHS OF ADJACENT STREETS & CURBS ~'~iLOCATION & OWNERS OF ALL ADJOINING LANDS, AS SHOWN ON TAX RECORDS "~::LOCATION & PURPOSE OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS --'!COMPLETE OUTLINE OF EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS APPLYING TO PROPERTY '~'411EXISTING ZONING '~-~'AREAS SUBJECT TO FLOODING OR STORM WATER OVERFLOWS --~,WATER COURSES, ~RSHES, WOODED AREAS, TREES 8" IN DIAMETER OR MORE ANY BUILDING WITHIN 100' OF PROPERTY ""~PAVED AREAS, SIDEWALKS, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO PUBLIC STREETS "--'[EXISTING SEWERS, CULVERTS, WATERLINES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO PROPERTY [FENCING LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING x'd[PROPOSED BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS "~'iOFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING AREAS ',', '--' ~ OUTDOOR LIGHTING OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS OUTDOOR SIGNS' ' 239K SIDEWALKS LOCATIONS WIDTHS: SIZE OE WATER AND SEWER LINES ~LANNING BOARD MEMBE9 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Edward Forrester, Code Enforcement Officer FROM: RE: DATE: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Mattituck AirJ~ase SCTM# 1000-123-1-2 March 18, 1998 This is in response to your letter concerning a C.O. for the above business. In a letter dated may 12, 1993 to Mr. Duell, project manager, the Board stated that the entire site must meet health and Fire District standards, (copy attached). There was other work done on the main building that never reached closure on the site plan. I will return from vacation on March 30, 1998, please have him contact me after this date. pLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latharn, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE ToWN OF souTHOLD SCOq'q~ L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 South01d. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 MaY 12, 1993 John Duell 1960 Country club Drive CutchogUe, NY 11935 RE: Proposed site plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck zoning District: Light industrial (LI) and Low Density Residenti~~[~ ' Dear Mr. Duell: The planning Board has reviewed your proposal for a phased development of the site plan for the aboVe mentioned project- The Board is aware that the proposed hanger, as the Suffolk county Department of Health ServiceS had indicated on the plan, does not require Health approval if the other buildings are removed from the plan or both projeCtS are accomplished in site phaseS. ' The Board does not approve of this proposal as the entire must meet Health and fire ~istrict requirements- If you have any questions, or require further information' please contact this office. sincerely, - Richard G/ward chairman .... :c,-ham, Airport Manage~ inspector cc: oay ~x ~ -~on Senior Building curtis ~oiu , Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1802 OFFICE OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement.~/'- BP # 21439-Z - J. Parker Wickham, Mattituck Airbase Suff. Co Tax Map #1000-121-1-2 DATE: March 17, 1998 Mr. Wickham has applied to this department for the Certificate of Occupancy for the above building permit which was issued to Construct a hanger. Since Site Plan Approval is required by your office, we have not issued the CO. Please advise if the Site Plan has been approved so that we may issue the CO. Soutbold Tow~ Planning Board RAYMOND L. JACOBS SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS 765-3140 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JAMES A. RICIITER ENGINEERING INSPECTOR 765-3070. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Bennett OrlowpkD, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board James A. Richter Short Environmental Assessment Forms As per your request, enclosed please find the short environmental assessment forms for the above referenced projects. Please be advised that Part III of this form still requires your signature and related information. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. e%%c. 1~-16~ '(2/8~)--Text 12 PROJECTI.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE For UNLISTED ACTIONS i ~ SEQR ,evle~v 3sME~'0RM PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT ,SPONSOR~//..~j~b~.. ~. ~"'(-~/R_~' e 2' PROJECT NAME~ ~/f'~ ~"'~h 3. PRC~uEnCi:ipLaOlit¢;TiON:M~.,_~--~ ~ /~, County ~_~. ~ ~ 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) 5. IS PROPOSED ACT.IO~N: ~ ~'New ~Expansion [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately ~_?~:2 ~.,.~ acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHERVL~[STING LAND USE RESTRiCTiONS? [~ Yes [] No If No, describe briefly g. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential ~ Industrial [] Commercial Describe: [] Agriculture [] Park/Forest/Open space [] Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? [] Yes ~No If yes, list agency(s) and permitlapprovals 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [~ NO If yes, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMiT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? []Yes ~No Signature: ~ ~ ~_~ If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE ~IENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION F. XCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.727 [] Yes ~J~No If yes, coordinate the review pro(:ess and use the EULL EAF B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617 6? if NO, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency, [] Yes C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production o~ disposal potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or o her na u al resources~ Explain briefly.I C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefty C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C57 Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes ~ No If Yes, explain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For e~ch adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of Occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessarT, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ~ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the'reasons supporting this determination: Pt. ANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L Edwards Tclephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 , 191 John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Keogh: I Pk~7,i:~,~ .......... Enclosed please find (2) surveys for Please notify this office as to whether any fireweIls are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply bY "~l~"f~/7, 199~. Thank you for your cooperation. very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, J~. Chairman enc. PROPOSED $~BMERSIBLE WELL TO BE LOCATED AT THE SOUTH END OF AIRWAY DRIVE ON THE EAST SIDE. Board of Fire Commissioners Mattituck Fire District George T Woodhull, Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD November 4, 1992 SCOff L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 C~]tchogue, NY 11935 RE: Amendment to Site plan for Mattituck Airbase Airway Drive, Mattituck SCTM#1000-123-1-2 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on November 2, 1992. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, take lead agency and as such make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for you records. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr, Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 November 2, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Amendment to site plan for Mattituck Airbase SCTM~: 1000-123-1-2 & 2 Location: South end of Airway Drive, Mattituck SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: No (x) Description of Action: Yes ( ) Proposal includes the construction of several additions to existing buildings and a separate hangar to house airplanes. Page 2 Mattituck Airbase SEQR Negative Declaration Con't. Reasons Supporting This Determination: There has been no correspondence received from any of the other coordinating agencies in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from those agencies. The proposed action involves expanding storage facilities and adding an additional hangar for small plane storage in an airbase in the Light Industrial zoning district. An environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should~ the project be implemented as planned. For Further Information: Contact person: Valerie scopaz Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Roger Evans, DEC Commissioner Cramer Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Building Department Board of Trustees Applicant PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE ' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'UY L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: James Richter, Engineering Inspector Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Review of Short Environmental Assessment Form for Amendment to Site Plan for Mattituck Airbase Airway Drive, Mattituck SCTM$ 1000-123-1-1 & 2 DATE: October 26, 1992 Please review the attached Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF) in time for the Planning Board's next meeting on November 2, 1992. If you have any questions, please contact Valerie Scopaz of this office. Enc. 14-16-4 (2/87)--Text 12 IPROJECTI.D. NUMBER I s17.21 ~ln~ ~ SEQR Appendix C State Environmental Quality'j~evie~__~ SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS ~""~'~ - ~ .............. ' PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 3. PROJECT LOCATION: 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOU O LA : ~J _ ~ ~· B. W':::":YRoPOSED ACTION UBE RESTRICTIONS? [~ Yes [] No If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? Residential ]~ Industrial [] Commercial Describe: [] Agr[cu[ture [] Park/Forest/Open space [] Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? [] Yes [~No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals t I. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [~ NO If yes, list agency name and permitlapprova[ 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? []Yes [~No I C ~TIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE If the action is in the Coastal A?ea, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES.~ NT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION ~XCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD iN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12'~ [] Yes ~No . ~f yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 61767 If No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. [] Yes [~o C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or d!sposaL potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood charac er? Explain briefly; C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, slgnilicant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly; C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain brlefly~ C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be inauced by the proposed action? Explain Priefly. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C57 Explain briegy. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain brielly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [~ No If Yes, explain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be'completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly tO the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ~ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the 'reasons supporting this determination: Title of Responsible Officer Signature ot Respon~lb[e Officer in Lead Agency PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G, Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York I 1971 Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: James Richter, Engineering Inspector Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ~0~//5 Review of Short Environmental Assessment Form for Amendment to Mattituck Airbase Site Plan Airport Drive, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-123-1-1 & 2 DATE: October 13, 1992 Please review the attached ~ Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF). If you have any questions, please contact Valerie Scopaz of this office. Eno. cc: Raymond Jacobs, Highway Superintendent · "" 14-16-2 (2/87)--7c 617.21 SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full E^F is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner.~vhether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introc[uction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts :2 and 3-.' Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Pa~t 3: If any impact in Part 2 is id;ntified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ~ Part 1 C1 Part 2 [-1part 3 Upon review of the information ~ecorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead a_ge~tha t: [~' A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which Wiil not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlist6d Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, '" therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* /' [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Na.me of Action Name of Lead Agency /'/gi,~--~t~, .~/Re~'m'~nsible Officer in Lead Age y Signature of Preparer (It different from responsible officer) / ! Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared Dy Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant ef~ on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to thbs'e questions will be conside as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additio information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invo new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spe( each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) NAME OF APPLICA SPON OR NAME OF OWNER (n OiHere.~)j , ¢~,~/[ ~ ~~ DESCRIPTION OF ACTION BUSINESS TELEPHONE STATE ZIP COOE BUSINESS TELEPHONE Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: I-1Urban ~lndustrial r'lForest I-1Agriculture ~ 2. Total acreage of project area: l ~- APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested fqCommercial i-IOther acres. I-IResidential' (suburban) PRESENTLY acres acres Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL] Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces' Other (Indicate type) ~l~&~ : 'I-~ , ~-r~'~. acres acres acres acres acres acres I-IRural(non-far AFTER COMPLETION acres acres o - acres 0 acres acres 0 acres '~"~ acres '~'"[ acres 3l What is predominant s~(s) on project site? ~_o~;,ott~. LeA~..~k,at~ a: Soil drain'age: ~ell drained /Oo % of ~,ite ' ~Mo~JeratelY well drained % of site I-]Poorly drained % of site ~/~r' If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N Land Classification System? _ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? C]Yes o[~' a. What is depth to bedrock? __ (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: [~0-10% ~"' % [-'110-15%., '~r __ ~ [~]15% or greater ~ % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contai a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Nation. Registers of Historic Places? I-lyes ~ .. 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ["Iyes ~ 8. What is the depth of the water table? _~J~ (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I'-~yes ~ 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? I-lYes [~o 11. Does project site con, rain-any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered f-lyes [~o According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or-unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e~, cliffs, dunes, other geological formations i-lYes ~ Describe - 13. Is the project site p.r_esently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? r"tYes E~'No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site~clude scenic views known to be important to the community? E]Yes 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to w/hich it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (in acres) 17. Is the site served by"~xisting public utilities? [2tY~esf' a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? e[~s b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~]Yes ~..INo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural~sttiCt certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~lyes ~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous t-°'w'C~tical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 l-lyes [~o 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~]Yes B. Project Description 1, Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor __-'~,......._~ acres. b, Project acreage to be developed: 0.4 acres initially; ~0.4 .Z;. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped __ ~.? ~ acres, acres ultimately. d. Length of project, in miles: ~///3 (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~--'---; proposed oo o~. g. Maximum vehicular trios ~,enerated per hour A~ /~:~ ~_~ - --- ~ ° ~ ~upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family' Initially Multiple Family Condominium Ultimately Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure I/o' height; ~width; J~O' length. J. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare proiect ~vill Occupy is? ~'//~ ft. · How much natural mate'i'i'"Jl'~l.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be rec a med? 1"3Yes I-]No ~N/A tons/cubic yards a. If yes, for what intend,,J purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? i-lYes E]No : ' c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? i-lYes r-INo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? j,,,~,G,G ~ ~¢ --'acres. $. Will any mature fo,,e'£t~over 100 years 01d) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? I'-]Yes 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction '~ months, (inc[uding demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated _ / (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I., ¢. Approximate completion date of final phase ~-,'/~- d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Will blasting occur during construction? I-lyes month- I~'./'~j:'/ year, (including demolition). month '~/~i'- " year. - i-lYes I~lo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project . ~'~/',~- . 11. Will project require relocation of any proiects or facilities? ; after project is complete [Yes ~ If yes, explain , 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I-lYes [][]'N~ a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal nvo[ved;~ [Yes [~N~--'Type 14. Will surface arena of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain ~/.- _ _~p'- 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~-IYes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? I-lYes N[~o a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? []Yes I-INo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary andfilll e. If Yes, explain /l-lyes I'-INo [Yes /l-]No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? E]Yes NE~o a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/month. b. I~ yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? E]Y'~s I~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? I-lyes N[~o 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise evels? [~]Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? []Yes If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity __~/~,- gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~'/)~ - gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal fund ng? [Yes If Yes, explain 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board I--lYes City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes I'qNo City, Town Zoning Board ~Yes [No City, County Health Department [Yes Other Local Agencies E]Yes [No Other Regional Agencies [Yes ~]No State Agencies I--lYes f-'iNo Federal Agencies [l-lYes F-INo Type Submittal Date C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision,~ [~es [No If ,~.'dicate decision required: L'.4. zoning amendment []-]zoning variance []special use permit [subdivision [-Isite plan [new/revision of master plan []resource management plan I-Iother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? L.'T. ~00~"'~'/~ ~ 3. What is the m~tential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? '~ ~ ,5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? . 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [~es'~ 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? ~ i-IN 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 'A.,~/ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization{s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I-lYes 11. Will the proposed action create~ demand for any community provided services {recreation, education, police fire protect on)? [l-lYes ~No : a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to hah.die projected demand? r-lyes [No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present evels? [l-lyes . a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? E]Yes [:]No. D. Informational Details .' Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adversc impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. / If the ac/n~.n~is.~is in-/he/oas'"'~a, Area. and you area stale agency~-~ complete th-~V'/~:e ~o'~asta, A~sess.en, For~ belor"~ p]oceedin] with this assessment § Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Application 6-02-92 Filing Fee D~te Rec'd New Use Change of Use Re-Use Extension of Existing Use Revision of an Approved Site Plan (Date of Approval Other Specify. X Name of Business or Site Mattituck Airport Location of Site Airway Drive, Mattituck, NY Address of Site, if available Airway Drive~ Mattituck~ NY Name of Applicant Jay P. Wickham Address of Applicant Airway Drive, Mattituck, NY Telephone 516-298-8330 Person to be responsible for Construction Jay P. Wickham Telephone 516-298-8330 Applicant's interest in site-check one: Owner of Land Owner Under contracn to purchase Owner of Fee Title to Land J.P. Wickham Address Telephone Site Plans Prepared by R. VanTuyl License No. 65 25626 Address Greenport, NY Telephone 516-477-0170 Total Land Area of Site Existing Use of Site Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) Datum(Spccif¥)U.S.G.S. ~ Has applicant been granted a variance and/or Board of Appeals Sq. Ft. Zone District Proposed Use of Site sqft. 4~g3d sqft. sqft. ~F~d sqft. % Other special exception by Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTkKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOARD. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 ~FOL~( PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O, Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 O~tober 15~. 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck SCTM9 1000-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has reviewed the revised site plan dated October 1992, and comments as follows: The plans have been sent to the Engineering Inspector and the Building Inspector for review The site plan does not show the proposed lighting plan, nor does it show the extension of electrical service to the new hangar. Please confirm in writing that there are no plans to install electrical service in the new hangar. The Board also discussed your verbal statement to staff that there was no need for Health Department approval for the amended site plan based on your conversations with Health department personnel. Please send us either a copy of a site plan with the Health Department's exemption stamp affixed thereto or a copy of a letter from the Health Department stating that they have exempted the proposed additions from their review. We would also appreciate receiving a copy of the elevation plans for the new hangar. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett OrlowskL Jr., Chairman George Ritchi¢ Latham, .Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 7654938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 SCOWF L, HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 19 ~7_ Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find (2) surveys for Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply bY ~.~6,f3./7, 199~. Thank you for your cooperation. enc. very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, J~. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOWF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: FROM: RE: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman~JF5 Site Plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-123-1-1 & 2 DATE: October 13, 1992 Please review the attached site plan for certification. The attached correspondence explains the reasons for the revised site plans. At this point, we do not know if a fire well will be needed. The Mattituck Fire District's comments will be forwarded to you upon receipt. August 11, 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning: Light Industrial (LI) and Low Density Residential(R-80) SCTM9 1000-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has received your preliminary site plan dated July 27, 1992, and cormments as follows: The tarmac for the new hanger should be shown on the plan; and must be included in the drainage calculations. 2. Any proposed outdoor lighting must be shown. Construction plan should be provided as indicated in Mr. Wickham's letter of March 13, 1992. Parking calculations and location of the parking spaces for the new 5,850 square foot hanger must be shown. In addition to the above, an application form and fee of $255 must be submitted. Nine copies of the site plan should be submitted with the application. A Suffolk County Health Services Approval, (or exemption stamp), on the plan, will be required before final approval can be given. April 9, 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning: Light Industrial and R-80 SCTM#1000-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has received your site plan, dated March 17, 1992, for a proposed aircraft storage building at Mattituck Airport. In order to proceed with your application the Planning Board needs the following information/data: The plan you submitted shows an expansion to the office and shop in addition to the, "penciled in", proposed aircraft storage building. Is this the plan you wish the Board to review? If so the proposed aircraft storage building must be shown on the plan. Drainage calculations must be shown for the proposed aircraft storage building, proposed addition to the office, and the proposed addition to the shop. Parking calculations for all uses on the site must be shown. Both the zoning line and the property line must be shown. The application for the expansion of the office and shop, that was submitted on November 9, 1990, does not show the proposed aircraft storage building. A new application must be submitted showing all three buildings. A Long Environmental Assessment form must be submitted. The LEAF submitted with the zone change does not include all of the elements in the proposed site plan. A site plan fee was not included with the application submitted on November 9, 1990, and the change of zone fee was returned. A new fee for an amended site plan must be submitted. In conclusion, nine copies of the proposed site plan including the above mentioned data, together with an LEAF and the fee for an amended site plan must be submitted before the Board can proceed with their review. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: DATE: James Richter, Engineering Inspector Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman~O.?'/0% Site Plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck SCTM$ 1000-123-1-1 & 2 october 13, 1992 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York [197! Fax (5t6) 765-1823 Please review the revised drainage shown on the attached site plan. The attached correspondence explains the reasons for the revised site plans. August 11, 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning: Light Industrial (LI) and Low Density Residential(R-80) SCTM9 1000-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has received your preliminary site plan dated July 27, 1992, and comments as follows: The tarmac for the new hanger should be shown on the plan; and must be included in the drainage calculations. 2. Any proposed outdoor lighting must be shown. Construction plan should be provided as indicated in Mr. Wickham's letter of March 13, 1992. Parking calculations and location of the parking spaces for the new 5,850 square foot hanger must be shown. In addition to the above, an application form and fee of $255 must be submitted. Nine copies of the site plan should be submitted with the application. A Suffolk County Health Services Approval, (or exemption stamp), on the plan, will be required before final approval can be given. If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Jr. cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector April 9, 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning: Light Industrial and R-80 SCTM#1000-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has received your site plan, dated March 17, 1992, for a proposed aircraft storage building at Mattituck Airport. In order to proceed with your application the Planning Board needs the following information/data: The plan you submitted shows an expansion to the office and shop in addition to the, "penciled in", proposed aircraft storage building. Is this the plan you wish the Board to review? If so the proposed aircraft storage building must be shown on the plan. Drainage calculations must be shown for the proposed aircraft storage building, proposed addition to the office, and the proposed addition to the shop. Parking calculations for all uses on the site must be shown. Both the zoning line and the property line must be shown. The application for the expansion of the office and shop, that was submitted on November 9, 1990, does not show the proposed aircraft storage building. A new application must be submitted showing all three buildings. e A Long Environmental Assessment form must be submitted. The LEAF submitted with the zone change does not include all of the elements in the proposed site plan. A site plan fee was not included with the application submitted on November 9, 1990, and the change of zone fee was returned. A new fee for an amended site plan must be submitted. In conclusion, nine copies of the proposed site plan including the above mentioned data, together with an LEAF and the fee for an amended site plan must be submitted before the Board can proceed with their review. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Benpett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516~ 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOWl' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 John A. Keogh Mattituck Fire District P.o. Box 666 Mattituck, NY 11952~ Jan:uary 3, 1993 RE: Letter to Planning Board Regarding Fire Well' Policy Dear Mr. Keogh: The Planning Board has received your letter of January 27, 1993. This Board agrees with the conclusion of your Board that your responsibility is to make a recommendation as to the need and placement of a fire well. The Planning Board reviews your recommendation and advises the applicant if a well will be required. In the case of Mattituck Air Base, the Board informed the applicant that a well would be required. If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact this office. Sincerely, ~ Richard G. Ward Chairman (516) 298-8837 MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT P O BOX 666 MATTITUCK, NY 11952 FAX (516) 298-8841 January 27, 1993 Southold Town Planning Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 Board Dear Sirs, We were recently approached by the principals of the Mattituck Air Base in reference to our recommendation for the installation of a fire well in conjunction with the new construction on their property. As a board we would like clarification from you of our responsibility in this matter. We believe, that our input on these site plans is that of a recommendation to you as to need and placement of a fire well. We are not aware that we are responsible to the applicant as the party that can decide if the well is to be installed, it is our understanding that the enforcement of our suggestion is your responsibility. When site plans are received from your office we review them very carefully and make sure that our decisions are sound based on the type of change that is proposed and the now existing water supply. Although we have no trouble defending our decisions we question our ability to alter our original recommendation after it is submitted to your office. Please advise us of you opinion on this in writing at your earliest convenience. Thank you. Sincerely, SOUTHOL£, ~ t PLANNING I~C,:. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTY L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O, Box 1179 Southold. New York I t971 Fax (516) 765-1823 November 18.. 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning: Light Industrial (LI) and Low Density Residential(R-80) SCTM# 1000-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has received the enclosed letter and plan showing a recommended fire well location from John A. Keogh, Secretary of the Mattituck Fire District. The Planning Board will proceed with its review upon receipt of revised plans showing the location of the fire well and the items contained in the Board's letter to you of October 15, 1992, (copy enclosed). If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennetl Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Lalham. Jr. Richard G. Ward ~Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'UF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find surveys for Please notify this office as to whether any firewe£1s are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply .by ~.~./f 199~. Thank you for your cooperation. · very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Chairman enc. PROPOSED S~BMERSIBLE WELL TO BE LOCATED AT THE SOUTH END OF AIRWAY DRIVE ON THE EAST SIDE. Board of Fire Commissioners Mattituck Fire District George T Woodhull, Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. , Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'FF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Omtober 15, 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck SCTM9 1000-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has reviewed the revised site plan dated October 1992, and comments as follows: The plans have been sent to the Engineering Inspector and the Building Inspector for review The site plan does not show the proposed lighting plan, nor does it show the extension of electrical service to the new hangar. Please confirm in writing that there are no plans to install electrical service in the new hangar. The Board also discussed your verbal statement to staff that there was no need for Health Department approval for the amended site plan based on your conversations with Health department personnel. Please send us either a copy of a site plan with the Health Department's exemption stamp affixed thereto or a copy of a letter from the Health Department stating that they have exempted the proposed additions from their review. We would also appreciate receiving a copy of the elevation plans for the new hangar. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman RAYMOND L. JACOBS SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS 765-3140 JAMES A. RICHTER ENGINEERING LNSPECTOR OFFICE OF T]tE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 765-3070 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 NOVEMBER 13, 1992 RE: MATTITUCK AIRBASE SCTM # 1000 - 123 - 01 1 & 2 DEAR MR. ORLOWSKI: AS PER YOUR REQUEST, I HAVE REVIEWED THE SITE PLAN FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT. YOUR LETTER DATED AUGUST 11, 1992 INDICATED THAT THE TARMAC FOR THE NEW HANGER SHOULD BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND INCLUDED IN THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS. THE AREA CALCULATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WERE ONLY FOR BUILDING FOOT PRINTS. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN DOES MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THOSE AREAS BUT I COULD FIND ANY EVIDENCE OF NEW TARMAC BEING PROPOSED. IF NEW TARMAC AREAS ARE INCLUDED IN THE PROJECT THEY WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE DRAINAGE DESIGN. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS REVIEW, PLEASE CONTACT MY OFFICE. /AMES A. RICHTER, R.A. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: FROM: RE: James Richter, Engineering Inspector Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Review of FPa~r~ Environmental Assessment Form for Amendment to Mattituck Airbase Site Plan Airport Drive, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-123-1-1 & 2 DATE: October 13, 1992 Please review the attached ~-- ..... ~ Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF). If you have any questions, please contact Valerie Scopaz of this office. Enc. cc: Raymond Jacobs, Highway Superintendent · '"'"' 14-16-2 (2/87)--7c SEQR 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner.~vhether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance· The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introc[uction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full £AF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project ~nd its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes ptace in Parts 2 and 32' Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important· DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: i'q Part I [] Part 2 C]Part 3 Upon review of the information ~'ecorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead a_ge.~...t h a t: ~ A, The proiect will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which Will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the proiect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlist6d Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, "therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* /~' [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Na.me of Action Name of Lead Agency ,' Print o~ype Name o~e/~ponsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Oig~..atu~'re o/ReS~nsible Officer in Lead g Y Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant e on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to th~s'e questions will be consk as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addit information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3, It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not in~ new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and sp= each instance. LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) NAME OF APPLICA SPON OR ADDRESS DESCRIPTION OF ACTION O~~ DT~Q~ i O~ ' BUSINESS TELEPHONE BUSINESS TELEPHONE Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: rlUrban ~lndustrial r'lForest i-lAgriculture . 2. Total acreage of project area: I Z. [ ± acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, huUdings and other paved surfaces' Other (Indicate type) G~.~. I-]Commercial ClOther I-IResidential' (suburban) I-1Rural (non-fa PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETIOF acres acre o acres O acre o acres O ::' ' __ acre o acres O acre- ._ o acres 0 acre: 4.0 acres 4.~' acre: acres "[."i' acre- 3. Wt~at is predominant s~(s) on proiect site? -_~,D~'et~. ~eA~; a. Soil drainage: E~ell drained /~.o % of ~ite ' I-IModerately well drained % of site [-1Poorly drained % of site /v//~.' If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the h Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? i-lyes a. What is depth to bedrock? ~ (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: E]0-10% ~' % E310-1 []15% or greater J 0.6 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Natio, Registers of Historic Places? E3Yes ~ a 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the R~gister of National : ' 8. What is the depth of the water table~' _~/P/ {in feet) · Natural Landmarks? 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I--Iyes ~ ~Yes ~ 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? l-lYes 11. Does project site con. tair~' any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangere, []Yes [~o According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or-unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e], cliffs, dunes, other geological formation I-lYes ~ Describe 13. Is the project site p_r.esently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area []:]Yes E~lo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site..J,m:lude scenic views known to be important to the community? [l-lYes 1.5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: / a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary ~ 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by"~xisting pub/lc utilities? [:~es~- [-INo a) If Yes, does sufficient capa(~ity exist to allow connection? ~ b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? /-1Yes I'qNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural~st~ict certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? f-lYes [~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous t..c~C'~tical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 E3Yes 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? i--lYes B, Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project Sponsor '"/~o~' b. Project acreage to be developed: o.~i, -- - acres initially; O c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped "]"?~ acres d. Length of project, in miles: r~,~,~ -- ' ' (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed ~.~ %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~L._~; proposed OO g. Maximum vehicular tris ,enerated per hour ~ ~, .... - , ---- P g ~ ~,~Jvn completion of project)? h, If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially Multiple Family Condominium Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure __1/o' ~ height; ~ width; I'1 length. J. Linear feet of fro.ntage along a public thoroughfare project will Occupy is? ~/~ ft, 3 acres. acres ultimately. · How much natural teria ' i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? /~0,-,.~ ~ 3. Will disturbed areas be rec aimed? i-lyes [~No I~N/A _ tons/cubic yard a. If yes, for what intend~C purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [:]Yes ~No : ' c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? i-]Yes [:]No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? .~'~ 5. Will any mature foFe-£t~over 100 years Old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? f-lYes [~o -, 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction '~ months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated / (number). ' b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 , I~'/~/I C. Approximate completion date of final phase ~/~-- _ . d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? I-lYes month' /"z./'~-j year, (including demolition month '~//~r' " year. - I-lYes G~No' ~ 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete , 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project . ~,~/',~- . 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [:]Yes ~ If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal nvolved~ f-lYes a. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc.] and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? I~yes [~;~J~Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of proiect located in a 100 year flood plain? l-lYes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? r~Yes a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [:]Yes C]No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain I-lYes [:]No I-lYes [:]No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? C]Yes ~ a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/month. b. I~ yes, what is the anticipated site life? --- ~ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pest cides? E]Y'~s ~ 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? I-lYes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise eveJs,' 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? C]Yes [~No If yes , indicate type(s) I-lYes ~o~/ 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity .__~' , 23. Total anticipated water usage per day. ~ 1~ gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal fund ny? C]Yes If Yes, explain gallons/minute. 4 City, Town, Village Board I-lYes r-lNo City, Town, Village Planning Board J~Yes FqNo City, Town Zoning Board ~Yes E]No City, County Health Department r~Yes [No Other Local Agencies I-lyes I-1No Other Regional Agencies f-lYes E~No State Agencies DYes E]No Federal Agencies l-lYes r'qNo Type Submitta Date C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~ /-INo f ~.in'dicate decision required: L.dzoning amendment I-]zoning variance [:]special use permit D-]subdivision ~site plan F"lnew/revision of master plan ~lresource management plan []other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? k.~'. ~t")O~"C/-dl ~ 3. What is the m~tential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ~ 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [~es 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a Y~ mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? ~-J/ ~ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water d stricts~ I-lYes 11. Will the proposed action create..a, d~nand for any community provided services (recreation, education, polh fire protection)? I-lYes J~o a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to hah.die projected demand? I-lYes DNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [Yes · a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? r'lYes [~NO . D. Informational Details " Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your pro/ecL If there are or may be any adver~ impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to raffia, ate avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge / / Iw~i;~et~;;~=;~,~'oastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before p~--~-'~oceedln 5 Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Application 6-02-92 Filing Fee Dkte Rec'd New Use Change of Use Re-Use Extension of Existing Use Revision of an Approved Site Plan (Date of Approval Other .Specify X Name of Business or Site Mattituck Airport Location of Site Airway Driver Mattituck, NY Address of Site, if available Airway Drive~ Mattituck, NY Name o~ Applicant Jay P. Wickham Address of Applicant Airway Drive, Mattituck, NY Telephone 516-298-8330 Person to be responsible for Construction Jay P. Wickham Telephone 516-298-8330 Applicant's interest in site-check one: Owner of Land Owner Under contracn 'to purchase Owner of Fee Title to Land J.P. Wickham Address Telephone Site Plans Prepared by R. VanTuyl License No. 65 25626 Address Greenport, NY Telephone 516-477-0170 Total Land Area of Site Existing Use of Site Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) Datuan(Spccify)U.S.G.S. ~ Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals ZgM~ ~S Sq. Ft. Zone District ~?~{'~' Proposed Use o~ Site sqft. ~g3~ sqft. sqft. ~d .sqft. % Other Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDEET.~KEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOARD. PLANNI~NG BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G, Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 SCOq~F L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find (2) surveys for Please notify this office as to whether any firewei~ls are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply .by ~.~4~./f, 199~. Thank you for your cooperation. enc. very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, a~. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOT'F L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman./F5 Site Plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-123-1-1 & 2 october 13, 1992 Please review the attached site plan for certification. The attached correspondence explains the reasons for the revised site plans. At this point, we do not know if a fire well will be needed. The Mattituck Fire District's comments will be forwarded to you upon receipt. August 11, 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning: Light Industrial (LI) and Low Density Residential(R-80) SCTM~ 1000-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has received your preliminary site plan dated July 27, 1992, and comments as follows: The tarmac for the new hanger should be shown on the plan; and must be included in the drainage calculations. 2. Any proposed outdoor lighting must be shown. Construction plan should be provided as indicated in Mr. Wickham's letter of March 13, 1992. Parking calculations and location of the parking spaces for the new 5,850 square foot hanger must be shown. In addition to the above, an application form and fee of $255 must be submitted. Nine copies of the site plan should be submitted with the application. A Suffolk County Health Services Approval, (or exemption stamp), on the plan, will be required before final approval can be given. April 9, 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning: Light Industrial and R-80 SCTMg1000-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has received your site plan, dated March 17, 1992, for a proposed aircraft storage building at Mattituck Airport. In order to proceed with your application the Planning Board needs the following information/data: The plan you submitted shows an expansion to the office and shop in addition to the, "penciled in", proposed aircraft storage building. Is this the plan you wish the Board to review? If so the proposed aircraft storage building must be shown on the plan. Drainage calculations must be shown for the proposed aircraft storage building, proposed addition to the office, and the proposed addition to the shop. Parking calculations for all uses on the site must be shown. Both the zoning line and the property line must be shown. The application for the expansion of the office and shop, that was submitted on November 9, 1990, does not show the proposed aircraft storage building. A new application must be submitted showing all three buildings. A Long Environmental Assessment form must be submitted. The LEAF submitted with the zone change does not include all of the elements in the proposed site plan. A site plan fee was not included with the application submitted on November 9, 1990, and the change of zone fee was returned. A new fee for an amended site plan must be submitted. In conclusion, nine copies of the proposed site plan including the above mentioned data, together with an LEAF and the fee for an amended site plan must be submitted before the Board can proceed with their review. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: James Richter, Engineering Inspector Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Cha~rma . Site Plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck SCTM9 1000-123-1-1 & 2 DATE: October 13, 1992 SCO'I-F L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1[79 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Please review the revised drainage shown on the attached site plan. The attached correspondence explains the reasons for the revised site plans. August 11, 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning: Light Industrial (LI) and Low Density Residential(R-80) SCTM9 1000-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has received your preliminary site plan dated July 27, 1992, and comments as follows: The tarmac for the new hanger should be shown on the plan; and must be included in the drainage calculations. 2. Any proposed outdoor lighting must be shown. Construction plan should be provided as indicated in Mr. Wickham's letter of March 13, 1992. Parking calculations and location of the parking spaces for the new 5,850 square foot hanger must be shown. In addition to the above, an application form and fee of $255 must be submitted. Nine copies of the site plan should be submitted with the application. A Suffolk County Health Services Approval, (or exemption stamp), on the plan, will be required before final approval can be given. If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector April 9, 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning: Light Industrial and R-80 SCTM#1000-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has received your site plan, dated March 17, 1992, for a proposed aircraft storage building at Mattituck Airport. In order to proceed with your application the Planning Board needs the following information/data: The plan you submitted shows an expansion to the office and shop in addition to the, "penciled in", proposed aircraft storage building. Is this the plan you wish the Board to review? If so the proposed aircraft storage building must be shown on the plan. Drainage calculations must be shown for the proposed aircraft storage building, proposed addition to the office, and the proposed addition to the shop. Parking calculations for all uses on the site must be shown. Both the zoning line and the property line must be shown. The application for the expansion of the office and shop, that was submitted on November 9, 1990, does not show the proposed aircraft storage building. A new application must be submitted showing all three buildings. A Long Environmental Assessment form must be submitted. The LEAF submitted with the zone change does not include all of the elements in the proposed site plan. A site plan fee was not included with the application submitted on November 9, 1990, and the change of zone fee was returned. A new fee for an amende~ site plan must be submitted. In conclusion, nine copies of the proposed site plan including the above mentioned data, together with an LEAF and the fee for an amended site plan must be submitted before the Board can proceed with their review. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McD,,mald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Z SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 1992 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and .- 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: p~opoSE ~ ~ ~Z ~/;r Fo~ ~r~ ~/< ;~l~ ~o~ ~-" Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (~') Unlisted Contact Person: ~. ~. i~ S5/~. (516)-765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (~) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ~- ( ) Other. ( See comments below). ~ Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: ~Board of Trustees Building'Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Stony Dr~k NYSDEC - Albany ~J~S~ Army Ccrp * Maps are enclosed for your.~eview Coordinating agencies PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone ~516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 September 15, 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: Proposed Site plan for Mattituck Airport SCTM~1000-t23-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, September 14, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, start the coordination process on this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: COMMENTS: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTMg: COMMENTS: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM~: COMMENTS: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER i, AU6 2 ? 1992 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 August 11, 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning: Light Industrial (LI) and Low Density Residential(R-80) SCTM# 1000-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has received your preliminary site plan dated July 27, 1992, and comments as follows: The tarmac for the new hanger should be shown on the plan; and must be included in the drainage calculations. 2. Any proposed outdoor lighting must be shown. Construction plan should be provided as indicated in Mr. Wickham's letter of March 13, 1992. Parking calculations and location of the parking spaces for the new 5,850 square foot hanger must be shown. In addition to the above, an application form and fee of $255 must be submitted. Nine copies of the site plan should be submitted with the application. A Suffolk County Health Services Approval, (or exemption stamp), on the plan, will be required before final approval can be given. Page 2 Mattituck Airbase If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlows~i, Jr. Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone {516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P,O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 April 9, 1992 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning: Light Industrial and R-80 SCTMg1000-123-1-1 & 2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has received your site plan, dated March 17, 1992, for a proposed aircraft storage building at Mattituck Airport. In order to proceed with your application the Planning Board needs the following information/data: The plan you submitted shows an expansion to the office and shop in addition to the, "penciled in", proposed aircraft storage building. Is this the plan you wish the Board to review? If so the proposed aircraft storage building must be shown on the plan. Drainage calculations must be shown for the proposed aircraft storage building, proposed addition to the office, and the proposed addition to the shop. Parking calculations for all uses on the site must be shown. o Both the zoning line and the property line must be shown. The application for the expansion of the office and shop, that was submitted on November 9, 1990, does not show the proposed aircraft storage building. A new application must be submitted showing all three buildings. A Long Environmental Assessment form must be submitted. The LEAF submitted with the zone change does not include all of the elements in the proposed site plan. A site plan fee was not included with the application submitted on November 9, 1990, and the change of zone fee was returned. A new fee for an amended site plan must be submitted. In conclusion, nine copies of the proposed site plan including the above mentioned data, together with an LEAF and the fee for an amended site plan must be submitted before the Board can proceed with their review. If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector FOR DISCUSSION - POSSIBLE RESOLUTION RESOLUTION - MARCH 2~l, 1992 RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes the refund of $1,500.00 to Mattituck Airbase, Inc., which sum represents the $1,000.00 filing fee for their change of zone petition, which they have withdrawn, and the $500.00 SEQRA reimbursement fee for the environmental review to be conducted by Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, which was never initiated on the Town's behalf. Prior to preparing this proposed resolution I consulted with Planning Board staff to determine whether time had been expended on behalf of this petition, and was advised it has not. The only time expended has been on site plan review, for which Mattituck AB will be charged a fee by the Planning Board. They will also be paying a building permit fee. March 17, 1992 Judith Terry Southold Town Clerk Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RECEIVED MAR '~ 8 ~gg2 Dear Ms. Terry: We wish to stop the petition for change of zone and have these monies, $1,000 for this and the $500 environmental review fee, refunded. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. MAT! IRBA Wickham ident INC. JPW/fap Town of Southold Route 25 Southold, New York 11971 Attn: B uild~ng Dept. Planrdng Board RE: Mattituck A~base Hangar P.O. BOX 1432, 410 A~R~^Y DRIVE. N~ITITUCK, NY 11952 FAX 516-298,8412 · 516-298-8330 March 13, 1992 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: At this time, we elect to halt the proceedings with reference to the Plan "A" zonLng change, and exercise Plan "B" that would place one hangar 30 feet Wide X 195 feet Long X 16 feet High East to West within the industrial zone. We will provide amended site plans and construction plans, requesting waiver of site plan applications fees as these have already been completed and paid. Thank you for your understadding in this matter. Sincerely, MATTITUCK AIRBASE INC. 3ay P. Wickham President P.O. BOX 1432r 4 I0 AiR~/AY DRIVE, MA~rITUCK, NY 11952 FAX 516~298-8412 · 516~298 8330 March 13, 1992 Town of Southold Route 25 Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Building Dept. Planning Board RF: TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: At this time, we elect to halt the proceedings with reference to the Rlan "A" zoning change, and exercise Rlan "B" that would place one hangar 30 feet Wide X 195 feet Long X 16 feet High East to West within the industrial zone. We will provide amended site plans and construction plans, requesting waiver of site plan applications fees as these have already been completed and paid. Thank you for your understanding in this matter. Sincerely, MATTITUC~'~AIRBASE INC. ~, y.*. ~/'ckham -j ?/ ~o&~ CA~A~Z~ o~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516} 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOWl' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 January 15, 1992 Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Town Hall $outhold, New York 11971 RE: Petition for Change of Zone by J. P. Wickham for Mattituck Airbase, Inc. S/W/c New Suffolk Avenue & Airway Drive, Mattituck SCTM # 1000-123-1-2 Dear Mrs..Terry: In response to the Lead Agency Coordination Request for the above noted project, this is to inform you that the Planning Board wishes to be an involved and coordinating agency in the environmental review of this proposal to change the zone of 4.8 acres from "R-80" to "LI". Further, since our understanding is that this change of zone will result in an application for site plan approval, we request that the applicant be asked to provide a site plan showing all proposed construction and uses of the land that is included in this rezoning petition. In closing, it is noted that the Long Environmental Assessment form should be reviewed by the Town's environmental consultant. Secondly, the answers to the questions A.9. and 14. of the Long EAF are not correct as shown. In both cases the answer should be "yes". The Planning Board will submit its environmental review recommendations upon receipt of the information noted above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman (t~ANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 September 6, 1991 Arthur Junge 21855 Route 48 Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning: Light Industrial and R-80 SCTM $ 1000-123-1-2 Dear Mr. Junge: The Planning Board has discussed the issues that were brought up during'the August 9th meeting that was held at the Airbase with Ritchie Latham, Valerie Scopaz, Bob Kassner, Jay Wickham and Rachel Duell. As we understand the situation, the proposed hangars are being constructed by airbase customers who wish to store their planes indoors. Jay Wickham, one of the airbase owners, is aware of and supports this proposal. The proposal calls for adding two new hangars to the south of the two existing hangars. The existing hangars are oriented in such a way that the view of the runway from the hangars is unobstructed. The proposal preserved this view, so to speak, by placing the new hangars in the exact same configuration and orientation as the old, only 60 feet further to the south. However, so placing the new hangars will result in a significant intrusion into the R-80 portion of the property. Airplane hangars are not a permitted use in this zone. You have two options. One is to apply for a change of zone to change part of the R-80 property to Light Industrial. The other is to locate the hangars in such a way as to keep the buildings entirely within the existing LI zone. Attached is a brief comparison of the two options for your reference. The latter option, relocating the buildings, is that recommended by the Board. Also, it will be less expensive and time consuming. However, regardless of how you decide to proceed, the following information must be shown on revised site plans-. 1. The correct location of the zoning line; 2. The location of the boundaries of all the properties that belong to the Airbase; 3. if you elect to realign the buildings, please place them within the LI zoning district line. Also reserve 100 feet to the south of the buildings for access and buffer. If there are any questions, please contact Valerie Scopaz of this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. V$/vs cc: Jay Wickham, Owner and Manager Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Comparison of Options for Mattituck Airbase: A: Change of Zone. B: Relocation of Hangars; A. The change of zone option would require the project sponsors to petition the Town Board for a change of zone. The initial fee is $1000. Additional fees for the environmental review will be at least $400 and possibly as much as $1000 or more if a draft environmental impact statement is required. It is not uncommon for the Town Board to require a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for a change of zone petition. In addition, you will have to pay a qualified consultant to write the impact statment. Whether the change of zone is granted or not, you still have to go through the site plan process. B. The relocation option will result in the placement of the two buildings inside the zoning line between LI and R-80. This means that approximately 60 feet of the R-80 zoned land to the south of the buildings will be used to manuever the planes in and out of the hangars. This option will result in the partial or total obstruction of the view of the runway from the existing hangars. However, the new hangars will have a clear view from the south side of the buildings. This option also will require that the Planning Board allow the use of the R-80 zoned property for manuevering and plane "parking". At present, the airbase property is under two separate deeds. The larger piece, which is zoned R-80, is the piece that runs to the south of the base proper. The base itself is zoned LI. Jay Wickham said that he is willing to covenant that if the residentially zoned parcel is ever sold, it would be sold without the portion that would lie adjacent to the proposed hangars. (We discussed reserving a strip of 100' deep; which would account for 60 feet to the south of the hangar and an additional 40 feet for plane storage and buffer or screening, should such become necessary in the future.) This option will cost $255 in site plan application fees, plus $400 for the environmental review for a total of $655. It is anticipated that the application could be processed by this office within three months, assuming a complete site plan application were submitted and n~o unforseen problems arise. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: FILE Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Mattituck Airbase Airport Drive, Mattituck Zoning: Light Industrial and R-80 SCTM # 1000-123-1-2 DATE: August 22, 1991 On August 9th, Ritchie Latham, Bob Kassner and I met with Arthur Junge, Jay Wickham and Rachel Duell at the Mattituck Airbase. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss alternative locations for the proposed hangars. The proposed hangars are being constructed by airbase customers who wish to store their planes indoors. Jay Wickham, one of the airbase owners, is aware of and supports this proposal. Mr. Junge and Mrs. Duell represent the customers who were going to finance the construction of the hangars. The addition of two new hangars would provide storage for 12 more planes. The hangars must be assessible from both sides so that six planes with 40' wingspans can be parked side by side without their wings overlapping (three planes per side). As a consequence, each hangar must have a minimum of 60 feet of manuevering room adjacent to the sliding door entrances. The hangars will be one story high. They will be made of corrugated aluminum (Morton buildings). The proposed dimensions are 30' by 170'. The proposal calls for adding two new hangars to the south of the two existing hangars. The existing hangars are oriented in such a way that the view of the runway from the hangars is unobstructed. The project sponsors hoped to "preserve this view" so to speak, by placing the new hangars in the exact same configuration and orientation as the old, only 60 feet to the south. However, so placing the new hangars would result in a significant intrusion into the R-80 portion of the property. Plane hangars are not a permitted use in this zone. The project sponsors have two options. One is to apply for a change of zone to Light Industrial. The other is to locate the hangars in such a way as to keep the buildings entirely within the existing LI zone. On the following page is a listing of the pros and cons of each option. My recommendation is that the project sponsors relocate the hangars so that they remain within the LI zone. This option is not only less expensive and time consuming, but will serve to contain the airbase use to that area so specified by the Zoning Map. Comparison of Options: A: Relocation of Hangars; B: Change of Zone. A. The relocation option will result in the placement of the two buildings along the zoning line between LI and R-80. This means that approximately 60 feet of the R-80 zoned land to the south of the buildings will be used to manuever the planes in and out of the hangars. This option will result in the partial or total obstruction of the view of the runway from the existing hangars. However, the new hangars will have a clear view from the south side of the buildings. This option also will require that the Planning Board allow the use of the R-80 zoned property for manuevering and plane "parking". At present, the airbase property is under two separate deeds. The larger piece, which is zoned R-80, is the piece that runs to the south of the base proper. The base itself is zoned LI. Jay Wickham is willing to covenant that if the residentially zoned parcel is ever sold, it would be sold without the portion that would lie adjacent to the proposed hangars. (We discussed reserving a strip of 100' deep; which would account for 60 feet to the south of the hangar and an additional 40 feet for plane storage and buffer or screening, should such become necessary in the future.) This option will cost about $655 in site plan application fees, including $400 for the environmental review. (Each hangar will be 5100 square feet in area. The total site plan application fee will be $255.) It is anticipated that the application could be processed by this office within three months, assuming a complete site plan application were submitted and no unforseen problems arise. B. The change of zone option would require the project sponsors to petition the Town Board for a change of zone. The initial fee is $1000. Additional fees for the environmental review will be at least $400 and possibly as much as $1000 or more if a draft environmental impact statement is required. The Town Board has required a DEIS for every change of zone request that has been made since the 1989 rezonings. If the change of zone is granted, the applicant still has to go through the site plan process. If the change is not granted, the applicant would then have to apply for Option A, as noted above. .qNG BOARD MEMBERS t Orlowski, Jr., Chairman rge Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald ~.enneth L. Edwards :phone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD scoTr L. HAI~ Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 M P.O. Box 11/ Southold, New Yor] Fax (516) 765-1 October 19, 1990 Jay Wickham Airway Drive Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposed Sire plan for Mattituck Airport SCTM# 1000-123-1-2 Dear Mr. Wickham: The Planning Board has reviewed your proposal. The following changes must be made before the Board can proceed: The proposed addition to the storage building must be shown as a solid line, and the word "proposed" must be deleted because this building addition is now existing. The square footage of the two (2) proposed buildings must be shown. 3. If outdoor lighting is to be used it must be shown. e Parking spaces and calculations must be shown for the proposed and existing buildings. In addition to the above, an amended site plan application must be filed. A copy of the application is enclosed for your use. If you have any questions, or require further assistance please contact this offi~ (I.9[/.,~/~.~r'''g ~ ~ ~:~ /Bennett Orlowski Jr. ~I~ ~l ~ Chairman MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 666, 1000 PIKE STREET MAI-FI~UCK, LONG ISLAND, N.Y. 11952 Phone 298-8833 May 1, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Sputhold N.Y- 11971 Re: SCMT 1000-123-1-2 Dear Sir, In regards to the above mentioned Planning Board number please be advised that the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District recommended a fire well at your request. At this time a fire well would be an asset to both the Fire District and the airport facility, but, it is not the intent of the Fire District to impose any immediate action. It should be considered, for the not too distant future, to install a well in the vicinity- j' ,/ $ 73. ~r r r \, 4000 ,4' L7 [~ T ,,i I45.76 /-,,, / J '\ 'i ! ~UFFOLK COUNTY g)EPARTMENT OF HEA£TH H;D. Ref. No. ~ased ~e~ Ihe Informotlon submitted, it has been dIIdrmined that this project does not require a~l~l~ional sewage elJsposa_l or ,~ater supply faciliti~,~