HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-122.-6-30.1PART I
NEW i:K STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVA1 ION
DIVISION OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS
State Environmental Quality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
JUN
Project Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor)
ANDREW & WTT,T.TAN GOODAT,E Offic,~.
Projectlocation: 7655 Main Road, Route 25, New York
~ New ~ Expansion ~ModJficat~onfalteration
5. Describeprojectbriefly: Relief from disapproval of the Building Inspector,.Articl
III Section 100-31 of the Building Code, Town of Southold, in that
variance required by action of the Zoning Board of Appeals: Bulk &
Minimum habitable space is 850 square feet
6, Precise location (road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc. or provide map)
Hamlet of Laurel, north side of New York Route 25, about 400' east
of the intersection of Bray Avenue, frame and cinderblock structure
7, Amount of land affected:
Initially i . 12 acres Ultimately c* =.~.w).e acres
8. Will proposed action comply with existing zoning or other existing land use restrictions, E~Yes No If No, describe briefly
9. What is present land use in vicinity of prelect?
E~ Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial [] Agriculture [] Parkland/open space [] Other lIB_1" Zl~ne
Describe:
The vacant and existing land in the vicinity is zoned for commercial
and General Business use.
10 Does action invotve a permit/approvaL or funding, now or ultimately, from any other governmental agency (Federal, state or local]?
~ Yes [] No If yes, list agency(s) and permitJapprovals Variance from the Southold Town
Board of Zoning Appeals as indicated in question 5
11. Does any aspect oJ the action have a currently valid permit or approval?
~ Yes [] NO If yes, list agency name and permiL/approval type Certificate of Occupancy, resi-
dential structure
Applicant~sp ......... k Andrew & William Goodale, per Andrew Gooda~e:~ %~J~'~
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the
Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment
OVER
PART II Environmental Assessment (To be completed by Agency)
A. Does action exceed any Type I threshold in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.127 If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL/LONG FORM EAF
f~e,
C, Could action result in ANY adverse effects on, to, or arising from the following: (Answers may be handw itten, if legible)
C1. Existing air quabty, surface or groundwater qualiW or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal potenbai for e~os~cm
drainage or flooding problemsf Explain briefly:
C2. Historic, archeological visual or aesthetic or other natural or cultural resources; agricultural districts; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefi
C3. Vegetation or fauna, movement of fish or wildl fe species, sign f cant habitaLs or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly:
C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly
C7 A change in use of either quantity or ypeof energyl Explain briefly
PART [11 Determination of Significance (To be completed by Agency)
INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise
significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i,e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring;
(c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting
materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified
and adequately addressed.
[] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then
proceed directly to the FULL/LONG FORM EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration.
[] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting docurnel~tat on,
that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide here, dnd on
attachments as necessary, the reasons supportng this determination:
Preparer's Signature/Title
I
I
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
Chairman ~
WILLIAM J. CREMERS ~
KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR.
RICHARD G. WARD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement
Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer ~
Violations
January 13, 1999
The following violations have come to the attention of the Planning Board:
· Goodale used car lot
Main Road, Mattituck
SCTM# 1000-122-6-30· 1
Used cars being stored and sold on Jerome lot across the street.
· Lucas Ford
Hortons Lane, Southold
SCTM# 1000-59-3-32.1
Used cars for saie on front landscaped area
Please review for corrective action.
1050 YorOS A~., FO B~X 1210
S~utYold, New YO~< 11971
September 28, 1993
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
Mattituck Auto Center,
Rt. 25, Laurel, NY
SCTM~ 1000-122-6-30.1
Inc ·
Gentlemen:
I am in receipt of your letter to me dated September 3,
1993, wherein you indicate your intent to close my client's site
plan application file with your office.
Please be advised that there are two lawsuits pending in the
Suffolk County Supreme Court regarding the denial by the ZBA of
my client's Special Exception application and a declaratory
judgment action against the Town of Southold to have the
applicable section of the zoning ordinance ruled
unconstitutional. In addition, my client is in the process of
filing a new Special Exception application for the leasing of
vehicles at the subject premises.
As a result of the foregoing, please keep this file open, so
that we may return to you once the aforesaid issues have been
resolved.
· Ver
September 28, 1993
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Mattituck Auto Center, Inc.
Rt. 25, Laurel, NY
SCTM~ 1000-122-6-30.1
Gentlemen:
I am in receipt of your letter to me dated September 3,
1993, wherein you indicate your intent to close my client's site
plan application file with your office.
Please be advised that there are two lawsuits pending in the
Suffolk County Supreme Court regarding the denial by the ZBA of
my client's Special Exception application and a declaratory
judgment action against the Town of Southold to have the
applicable section of the zoning ordinance ruled
unconstitutional. In addition, my client is in the process of
filing a new Special Exception application for the leasing of
vehicles at the subject premises.
As a result of the foregoing, please keep this file open, so
that we may return to you once the aforesaid issues have been
resolved.
Very
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Richard C. Wilton
Telephone (516) 765-1809
Appl. No. 4120-v.
BOARD OF APPEALS
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Application in behalf of MATTITUCK AUTO CENTER, INC. and
'WILLIAM GOODALE. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXI,
Section 100-212B for relief from the front yard landscaping
provisions of the zoning code. Location of Property: 7655 NYS
Route 25 (Main Road), Laurel, near Mattituck, NY; County Tax
Map Parcel No. 1000-122-6-30.1 (previously 30).
WHEREAS, after due notice, a public hearing was held on
July 22, 1993, at which time all those who desired to be heard
were heard and their testimony recorded (see written transcript
of' verbatim discussions during public hearing); and
. WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentation concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, Board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding
areas; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board finds as follows:
1. This is an appeal of the June 23, 1992 Building
Inspector's Notice of Disapproval concerning the requirement for
a 25-ft. buffer zone in the front yard.,area as per Article XXI,
Section 100-212B of the zoning regulations.
2. This. provision reads as follows:
Section 100-212. Front landscaped area.
A front landscaped area shall be required for
all uses in all zoning districts. The required
landscaped area shall be covered with grass or
other ground cover and shall include appropriate
trees and shrubs. As a minimum, in all
non-residential districts...one (1) shade tree
having a caliper of two (2) inches shall be
planted within the front landscaped area for
each forty (40) feet or fraction thereof of lot
SEI I 5
Page 2 - Appl. No. 4 D
Application of Mattituck Auto Center,
Decision Rendered August 18, 1993
Inc.
Tenant)
frontage. The purpose of the landscaping is to
enhance the appearance of the use on the lot but
not to screen the use from view
... B. Nonresidential districts. In all
nonresidential districts, there shall be a
landscaped strip in the front yard area; in the
... General Business ...Districts, the strip
shall be twenty-five (25) feet .... There shall
also be a landscaped area five (5) feet wide
abutting the front of the building in all
nonresidential districts ....
2. The subject property is located in the "B" General
Business Zone District in the Hamlet of Mattituck, To,~n of
Southold, and more particularly identified on the Suffolk County
Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 122, Block 6, Lot 30.1
(previously 30).
3. The subject parcel contains a total area of 36,155 sq.
ft. (.83 acre) with frontage of 120.0 feet along the north side
of State Route 25 {Main Road}. The average depth of the parcel
is 402+- feet. This parcel is presently improved with two
buildings, each containing a nonconforming single-family
residential use and built prior to April 23, 1957. These
buildings are more particularly shown on the April 11, 1986
survey prepared by Anthony W. Lewandowski, L.S. to be 53+- feet
from the southerly front property line.
4. Reference is also made to other requirements of the
zoning code and other zoning information relative to this
project and premises:
(a) a Pre-1957 Certificate of Occupancy 9Z10885 dated
March 1, 1982 relates to two nonconforming one-family dwellings
with accessory storage;
(b) Certificate of Occupancy #Z12534 dated June 11,
1984 relates to an addition to the existing one-family dwelling
for residential/storage purposes. At the time of issuance of
this Certificate, no uses other than the existing two
single-family residences occupied the premises.
(c) Years later, in 1991,
was added, without town approvals,
leasing business uses.
a third new principal use
for used-car sales and
(d) On October 31, 1991, an application for a Special
Exception was applied for under Appl. No. 4066 requesting a
~ ' ~age'3 - Appl. No. ~0
Application of Mattituck Auto Center,
Decision Rendered August 18, 1993
Inc. (Tenant)
permit to sale, store, display and park used cars and used
vehicles. That Special Exception permit was denied on
December 16, 1991 by the Board of Appeals for several reasons
{please see specifics of determination filed with the Town Clerk
on January 9, 1992}. At this time, area variances were
necessary for this new use on this parcel. Also, it should be
noted that proposed used car sales and leasing establishments
are permitted only as an accessory use to a new car sales
establishment or dealership -- which proof was not substantiated
in the record.
{e) Also, under Appl. No. 4093-SE, another Special
Exception application was filed by Mattituck Auto Center and
William Goodale for the sales, storage, display, and office
related to new 'and used cars, which application was denied by
the Board of Appeals on May 18, 1992.
(f) On July 10, 1992, a subsequent Special Exception
application was filed under Appl. No. 4119-SE for catalog sales
of electric-car kits, and used cars, display, storage and office
use related thereto. An interim decision was rendered by the
Bdard of Appeals on October 15, 1992, remanding this matter for
a final hearing to be held in July 1993. A final hearing was
held on July 22, 1993, and the Board of Appeals denied the
Special Exception on August 18, 1993.
(g) At this point in time, a formal application has
not been filed and processed by the Southold Town Planning
Board, the Building Inspector's Office for an occupancy
~ertificate, County Health for septic and/or water approvals, or
N.Y.S. Department of Transportation (as may be deemed
appropriate by law).
(h)
Certificate"
by the N.Y.S.
12/31/92.
Also, it is noted that the "Official Business
issued under the Vehicle and Traffic Law on 6/8/92
Department of Motor Vehicles has expired as of
5. The practical difficulties claimed by the
applicant-tenant are noted as follows:
(a) displaying vehicles at more than 25 feet from the
front property line would, they claim, preclude the possibility
of a successful operation;
(b) displaying vehicles at more than 25 feet from the
front property line, they claim, would prevent necessary
exposure, and that the display of vehicles must be visible to
the public for viewing and inspection;
Tage 4 - Appl. No. 20
Application of Mattituck Auto Center,
Decision Rendered August 18, 1993
Inc. (Tenant)
(c) The property is already improved with buildings,
lending to the limited area for outside vehicl~ displays.
(d) Other businesses, they claim, do not rely too
heavily upon public visibility for a successful business.
6. It is the position of this Board that the difficulties
claimed are not sufficient to warrant the variance requested for
the following reasons:
(a) the front yard area {between the front of the
existing principal dwelling and the front property line} is
shown to be an open, cleared area of approximately 6413+- sq.
ft., 53 deep feet by 121 feet wide. The amount of area which
would be required for a landscape buffer along the front
property line, excluding the egress and ingress areas, amounts
to approximately 1950 sq. ft. (25 ft. deep by 78+- feet wide).
The percentage of relief requested from the requirement
requesting by applicant-tenant is 100 percent, or 1950+- sq.
ft., in order that they may display up to eight (8) cars closer
to the state highway.
(b) There are alternatives available for appellant to
pursue - particularly in light of the fact that there is land
area available for this required ground cover {landscape} buffer.
(c) The relief, as requested is not consistent with
the essential character of the neighborhood - and the grant of
this type will set a precedent for other new businesses to
follow for little or no ground cover buffer.
(d) the difficulties claimed are self-created and are
not only related to uniqueness of the property;
(e) the variance, if granted,
to the safety, health, welfare, comfort,
of the town and nearby properties;
will in turn be adverse
convenience and order
(f) the amount of relief requested in relation to the
requirements is substantial at 100 percent;
(g) the land area:required to be placed with ground
cover for a buffer does not entirely eliminate spaces for
vehicle storage, display and/or parking since there are other
areas, other than the front yard, on this site for this purpose;
and
(h) the code specifications for a 'buffer' is "ground
cover" to "...enhance the appearance of the use on the lot but
not to screen the use from view .... " (Emphasis added). A
~age'5 - Appl. No. 4120
Application of Mattituck Auto Center,
Decision Rendered August 18, 1993
Inc. (Tenant)
~n~ ~over. 25 feet.~deep along th~ front property line will
aln&y nou screen the use from view.
Accordingly,
Doyen,'~as on motion by MemberVilla, seconded by Member
REsoLVED, that the relief requeste~nder Appl. No~ 4120 be
and hereby is DENIED.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Mess~b. Villa, Doyen, Dinizio,
Wilton, and,.Goehringer.~.This resolution was duly adopted.
~-] APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard R Goehringer, Chairman
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Richard C. Wilton
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
August 19, 1993
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
J. Kevin McLaughlin,
1050 Youngs Avenue
P.O. Box 1210
Southold, NY 11971
Esq.
Re: Appl. No. 4119 (Special Exception) - Mattituck Auto Center
Dear Mr. McLaughlin:
With reference to the above project, please find enclosed a
copy of the Board's Findings and Determination rendered at our
August 18, 1993 Regular Meeting.
Copies of this determination have been transmitted to the
Building Department, Planning Board, and Suffolk County Planning
Commission (which governs projects within 500 feet of a State
Highway).
Very truly yours,
GE~ P.
CHAIRMAN
Copies of Decision to:
Building Department~
Planning Board u--~
Town Attorney's Office
Suffolk County Department of Planning
GOEHRINGER
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Geehringer, Chairman
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Richard C. Wilton
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
ACTION OF THE BOARD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
Appl. No. 4119-SE. FINAL DETERMINATION on the Application of
MATTITUCK AUTO CENTER, INC. (as tenant) and WILLIAM GOODALE (as
owner) in this request for approval of Special Exception under the
Zoning Ordinance, Article X, Section 100-10lB(12) for a permit
authorizing: (a) a new car sales-rental establishment as a
principal use ; (b) an establishment of an accessory use
incidental to the proposed new car sales establishment for the
sale and/or lease of used vehicles; (c) outside display of
vehicles for sale in conjunction with the new car sales-rental
establishment; (d) accessory office use incidental to the new
principal use as a new car sales establishment, and related
accessory uses. Location of Property: 7655 Main Road (N.Y.S.
Route 25), Laurel,
near Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-122-6-30.1.
WHEREAS, an interim decision was rendered by this Board under
this application, with fifteen (15) conditions, dated October 15,
1992; and
WHEREAS, in that October 15, 1992 resolution, the Board of
Appeals extended time (eight months minimum) for the applicant to
submit adequate proof that the applicant, Mattituck Auto Center,
Inc. is a new motor vehicle lot, intending to conduct, or actually
conducting, as a principal use the on-site display, sales and
rental of new cars, (even though only the sales and display of
used cars has been conducted between 1991 and the present time);
and
WHEREAS, the Board of Appeals required a further hearing for
a final determination to be rendered on or about July 1993, which
includes review of the requisite proof, and necessary Board
reviews as to whether this record, in its entirety, adequately
fulfills the requirements and standards of zoning for the
applicant, Mattituck Auto Center, Inc. and its proposed principal
use, proposed accessory uses, as well as the percentages of
business in relation to the new cars sales as well as the
accessory use for sales of used cars; (Ref: Conditions #1 and #2
of the Board's October 15, 1992 determination; and
WHEREAS, the applicant, Mattituck Auto Center, Inc. has been
conducting on-site sales and display of used, second-hand cars
since early 1991 to the present time (without proper zoning
Page 2 - Appl. No.~19 (SE)
Application of MATS~TUCK AUTO CENTER, INC.
Decision Rendered August 18, 1993
permits, certificates of occupancy and use, etc.), and during the
eight-month extension of time, applicant confirms that he has not
sold or displayed any electric-car assembly kits at this site; and
WHEREAS, after due notice, a final public hearing was held on
July 22, 1993 by the Southold Town Board of Appeals, and those who
desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded (see
separate transcript of verbatim discussions during public
hearing);
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board finds as follows:
1. The provision of the Southold Town Zoning Code under
which this application is made reads as follows:
Article X, Section
100-101B. Uses permitted by special
exception by the Board of Appeals. The
following uses are permitted by the Board of
Appeals, as hereinafter provided, subject to
site plan approval by the Planning Board:
(12) Public garages, gasoline service
stations, new and used motor vehicle lots,
vehicle sales and rental, including the sale
of recreation vehicles and trailers and boat
sales, with accessory repair facilities, all
subject to the following requirements:
(a) Entrance and exit driveways shall have
an unrestricted width of not less than
twelve (12) feet and not m~re than thirty
(30) feet and shall be located not less than
ten (10) feet from any property line and
shall be so laid out as to avoid the
necessity of any vehicle backing out across
any public right-of-way.
(b) Sale of used vehicles or boats shall be
conducted only as accessory to the sale of
new vehicles or boats.
(c) Vehicle lifts or pits, dismantled
autombiles, boats and vehicles and all parts
or supplies shall be located within a
building.
(d) Ail service or repair of motor
vehicles, other than such minor servicing as
change of tires or sale of gasoline or oil,
shall be conducted in a building.
,Page 3 - Appl. No. 19 (SE)
Application of MATTI~fUCK AUTO CENTER, INC.
Decision Rendered August 18, 1993
(e) The storage of gasoline or flammable
oils in bulk shall be located fully
underground and not be less than thirty-five
(35) feet from any property line other than
the street line.
(f) No gasoline or fuel pumps or tanks
shall be located less than fifteen (15) feet
from the street or property line.
(g) Outdoor area lighting shall be that
generally required for security purposes and
shall be restricted to the front one-third
(1/3) of the lot depth. All outdoor
lighting shall be located at a height of not
more than fourteen (14) feet above ground
level and so directed that illumination
should not extend beyond lot lines.
2. The premises in question is located in the "B" General Business
Zone District in the Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold, and is more
particularly identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000,
Section 122, Block 6, Lot 30.1 (previously 30).
3. The subject parcel contains a total area of 36,155 sq. ft. (.83
acre) with a frontage of 120.0 feet along the north side of State Route 25
(Main Road). The average depth of the parcel is 402+- feet. This parcel
is improved with two principal structures, each utilized as a noncon-
forming single-family residential use. The existing structures are shown
on the April 11, 1986 survey prepared by Anthony W. Lewandowski, L.S.
4. By this application, a review and determination is requested to
approve the on-site sales and display of used, second-hand cars as a
principal use rather than as an accessory use. Applicant proposes:
(a) outside, on-site sales, storage, parking and display of used
cars and other used vehicles;
(b) on-site sales, leasing, and business office use related to the
primary use for the sales of used cars, and catalog sales of electric car
kits. The square footage of the building area intended for office sales
and business uses is 662 sq. ft., and the use of the existing residence is
limited to approximately 640 sq. ft. (the second floor only of the front
building).
5. Subsection 12(b) of Section 100-101B provides by Special
Exception from the Board of Appeals for the "...sale of used vehicles or
boats shall be conducted only as accessory to the sale of new
vehicles .... " It is noted that applicant, Mattituck Auto Center, Inc. is
not displaying or advertising new vehicles at the premises. In fact, it
Page 4 - Appl. No.il9 (SE)
Application of MATT~TUCK AUTO CENTER,
Decision Rendered August 18, 1993
INC.
is admitted that only used cars are displayed or advertised at the
premises. Catalog sales is also apparently being offered for electric
car kits. It is noted further that there is no electric car displayed or
sold on site, either assembled, disassembled in kits, or otherwise. It is
the position of this Board that catalog sales of kit cars located at
another site does not meet the requirement of a new car sales dealership.
(See copy of one-year limited agreement dated 6/10/92 between Robert A.
Adams, Vice President of Solar Car Corporation of Melbourne, Florida, and
the applicant, Mattituck Auto Center, Inc.)
6. For the record, it is noted that this parcel is also nonconforming
as to the required lot size for the two or more principal residential
uses. The total lot area of this parcel is 36,155 sq. ft., and the total
lot area required under the current zoning code for each residential unit
under the zoning code is 30,000 sq. ft. in this "B" Zone District, for a
total requirement of 60,000 sq. ft. for two principal (primary) uses.
The requirement for a third principal use is an additional 30,000 sq. ft.,
total 90,000 sq. ft. of land area (ref. Article XXIV, Bulk and Minimum
Lot Size, Density Schedules, etc.).
7. Also noted, as shown in the record,
previous Special Exception applications of
rendered by the Board of Appeals:
are the following denials of
the applicant herein as
A) Denial of Application No. 4066 for a Special Exception to
establish new use for outside, on-premises new and/or used motor vehicles
sales and leasing rendered December 16, 1991;
B) Denial of Application No. 4093 for a Special Exception
requesting the sales of new and used motor vehicles.
8. In considering this application, the Board finds that sufficient
proof has not been demonstrated, nor sufficient documentation submitted,
to show fulfillment of the standards and conditions set forth in the
zoning code at Section 100-101B(12-b).
NOW, THEREFORE, on motion by Member Villa
Member Doyen , it was
· seconded by
RESOLVED, that it is hereby DETERMINED this Board is without
authority to grant the Special Exception use requested by applicant,
Mattituck Auto Center, Inc. for the sales and display of used, second-hand
vehicles as a primary use, or as an accessory use, based upon the specific
wording of the current zoning code provision (as enacted by the Town Board
on January 10, 1989).
VOTE OF THE BOARD:
Soehringer.
duly adopted.
lk
Ayes: Messrs. Doyen, Dinizio, Villa, Wilton and
This resolution was
/~' GER3YRD P. GOEHRINGER~ CHAI~
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehrmger, Chairman
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Richard C. Wilton
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
October 16, 1992
J. Kevin McLaughlin,
1050 Youngs Avenue
P.O. Box 1210
Southold, NY 11971
Esq.
Re: Appl. No. 4119 - William C. Goodale (Special Exception)
Dear Mr. McLaughlin:
Please find enclosed a copy of the board's action taken
last night concerning the above application. The application
has been remanded for a final hearing to be held on or about
June 30, 1993 for the reasons noted therein.
A copy has also been transmitted to the involved town
departments for their update and information.
Very truly yours,
cc:
GERARD P. GOEH~INGER
CHAIRMAN
Building Department (Attn: V. Lessard)
Planning Board (Attn: B. Orlowski)
Town Attorney's Office
I 9 992
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Richard C. Wilton
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
ACTION OF THE BOARD
SCOTFL. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
Appl. No. 4119 (SE):
Application in behalf of WILLIAM GOODALE, as owner, and
RICHARD GOODALE (Tenant) for a Special Exception to the Zoning
Ordinance, Article X, Section 100-10lB(12) for a permit
authorizing: (a) a new car sales establishment; (b) an
establishment of an accessory use incidental to the proposed new
car sales establishment for the sale and/or lease of used
vehicles, (c) outside display of vehicles, (d) accessory
office use incidental to the new principal use as a new car
sales establishment. Location of Property: 7655 Main Road,
Laurel (near Mattituck), NY; County Tax Map Parcel No.
1000-122-06-30.1 (previously referred to as Lot 30).
WHEREAS, after due notice, a public hearing was held on
July 29, 1992 and September 10, 1992, at which time all those
who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded;
and
WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentation concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, Board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding
areas; and
WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact and
determination:
1. The premises in question is located in the "B" General
Business Zone District in the Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of
Southold, and is more particularly identified on the Suffolk
County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 122, Block 6, Lot 30.1
(previously County Parcel Lot 30).
2. The subject parcel contains a total area of 36,155 sq.
ft. (.83 acre) with a frontage of 120.0 feet along the north
side of State Route 25 {Main Road}. The average depth of the
parcel is 402+- feet. This parcel is improved with two
principal structures, each containing a nonconforming
Page 2 - Appl. No.I [19SE
Decision Rendered October 15,
Matter of WILLIAM GOODALE
1992
single-family residential use--which structures were built prior
to April 23, 1957 and are more particularly designated on the
April 11, 1986 survey prepared by Anthony W. Lewandowski, L.S.
3. The provision under which this application is made is
Article X, Section 100-101B(12) which reads as follows:
.... 100-101B. Uses permitted by special exception by
the Board of Appeals. The following uses are
permitted by the Board of Appeals, as hereinafter
provided, subject to site plan approval by the
Planning Board: ...
(12) Public garages, gasoline service stations,
new and used motor vehicle lots, vehicle sales and
rental, including the sale of recreation vehicles and
trailers and boat sales, with accessory repair
facilities, all subject to the following requirements:
(a)
Entrance and exit driveways shall have an
unrestricted width of not less than twelve
(12) feet and not more than thirty (30) feet
and shall be located not less than ten (10)
feet from any property line and shall be so
laid out as to avoid the necessity of any
vehicle backing out across any public
right-of-way.
(b)
Sale of used vehicles or boats shall be
conducted only as accessory to the sale of new
vehicles or boats.
(c)
Vehicle lifts or pits, dismantled autombiles,
boats and vehicles and all parts or supplies
shall be located within a building.
(d)
Ail service or repair of motor vehicles, other
than such minor servicing as change of tires or
sale of gasoline or oil, shall be conducted in
a building.
(e)
The storage of gasoline or flammable oils in
bulk shall be located fully underground and not
less than thirty-five (35) feet from any
property line other than the street line.
(f)
No gasoline or fuel pumps or tanks shall be
located less than fifteen 15) feet from any
street or property line.
Page 3 - Appl. No.~19SE
Decision Rendered October 15,
Matter of WILLIAM GOODALE
1992
(g)
(h)
Outdoor area lighting shall be that generally
required for security purposes and shall be
restricted to the front one-third (1/3) of the
lot depth. All outdoor lighting shall be
located at a height of not more than fourteen
(14) feet above ground level and so directed
that illumination should not extend beyond lot
lines.
No gasoline service or repair shops or similar
businesses are to be located within three
hundred (300) feet of a church, public school,
library, hospital, orphanage or rest home...
4. With reference to Section 100-101B, supra, the
following are noted to show a breakdown in the type of use
requested in the above-noted Special Exception category:
(a) Public Garage use is not proposed;
(b) Gasoline Service Station use is not proposed;
(c) New motor vehicle lot is not proposed. (The
subject lot will not be displaying new motor vehicles.)
(d) Used motor vehicle lot accessory to the sale of
new vehicles or boats IS proposed and is being considered..
No repair facilities are proposed.
No servicing or major repairs of motor vehicles
(e)
(f)
are proposed.
(g)
is proposed.
(h)
(i)
No storage of gasoline or flammable oils in bulk
No gasoline or fuel pumps or tanks are proposed.
No gasoline service or repair shop or similar
business is proposed.
5. Reference is also made by the Board for informational
purposes to Section 100-10lC, subsections (1-4) of the General
"B" Business zoning regulations which provide for other specific
accessory uses also subject to site plan review. Used car sales
and leasing and principal sales office uses are addressed in the
Zoning Code as principal uses in this zone district. It should
also be noted that these uses are not specifically listed in the
zoning code as allowable accessory uses to any other principal
uses, and applications requesting same have not been made until
March 5, 1992 (see variance for multiple uses with insufficient
land area under File No. 4092).
Page 4 - Appl. No.~19SE
Decision Rendered October 15,
Matter of WILLI~ GOODALE
1992
6. By this Special Exception application, the applicant
requests approval for:
(a) proposed telephone or office sales, by catalog or
brochure sales, for the shipping of solar-conversion cars from
the Solar Car Corporation located in Melbourne, Florida to a
location specified by a proposed purchaser -- the applicant is
not proposing display of the solar cars on-site because of the
company's requirements for purchase first, and the applicant, he
says, would have to purchase the vehicle to display it on this
property;
(b) proposed on-site sales and display of
approximately 13 used vehicles, plus additional parking for its
customers and employee(s) related to said used-car sales;
(c) proposed office use for leasing and related
business office activities, conducted in the front building
first-floor area of 662 sq. ft., in addition to the existing
principal single-family residential use of this building, and
separate existing single-family principal residential use of the
rear cottage structure. The square footage of the building area
intended for office sales and business uses is 662 sq. ft., and
the use of the existing residence would be limited to
approximately 640 sq. ft. of the second floor only (main front
building).
7. Reference is made to the following requirements of the
zoning code and other zoning information relative to this
project and premises:
(a) a Pre-1957 Certificate of Occupancy #Z10885 dated
March 1, 1982 relates to the above-mentioend two nonconforming
one-family dwellings with accessory storage;
(b) Certificate of Occupancy #Z12534 dated
June 11, 1984 relates to an addition to the existing one-family
dwelling for residential/storage purposes. At the time of
issuance of this Certificate, no uses were established at the
premises except for two single-family residences;
(c) subsequently, on June 4, 1986, an application was
made to the Board of Appeals under the bulk schedule of the
zoning code {our File No. 3521} for permission to reduce living
area in one of the nonconforming dwelling units in order to add
an accessory home occupation, to wit: lawyer's office for
Andrew Goodale which in 1986 would be permitted only as an
accessory to the residence of the professional. The accessory
home occupation (lawyer's office) was proposed to be located
within the existing residential area of the front principal
Jags
5 - Appl. No.~19SE
Decision Rendered October 15, 1992
Matter of WILLIAM GOODALE
building, without physical enlargement of the principal
structure and without expansion of any nonconforming living
areas remaining at the premises. The Bulk Schedule of the
zoning code (Section 100-31) in 1986 required a minimum livable
area of 850 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. A variance was granted
to allow a reduction in the livable floor area of the dwelling
unit to 767 sq. ft., however, no occupancy was made by Andrew
Goodale, the owner/applicant in 1986. It is personal knowledge
of board members that the premises was used solely for
single-family residential occupancy, without change for an
accessory home occupation-lawyer's office, as the permit records
show over the years. Although there was some interest in 1986
to add the accessory lawyer's office, the interest was abandoned
by Andrew Goodale over the next year or so.
(d) Later, in 1991, a third new principal use was
added, without town approvals or town permits, for used-car
sales and leasing. The applicant has been since early 1991 to
date operating a used-car sales establishment in conjunction
with the two existing residences without substantiating
sufficient proof that the establishment is an accessory to a new
car sales establishment as required in the zoning code.
Approvals for this newly added use are also necessary from and
are pending before the Southold Town Planning Board under the
site pla.n regulations of the zoning code, as well as the Town
Building Department, and other County and State governing
agencies.
8. Article XXIV, Bulk and Minimum Lot Size, Density
Schedules, etc. require 30,000 sq. ft. of land area for each
residentialunit in this "B" Zone District, for a normal
requirement of 60,000 sq. ft. The requirement for a third
principal use is the same, i.e. 30,000 sq. ft. additional.
Combined, the total lot area requires 90,000 sq. ft. of land
area for (any) three principal uses. The applicant's request to
allow increased density on this 36,155 sq. ft. parcel was
denied; however, alternative relief for the total lot area to
accommodate two principal uses as a maximum was conditionally
granted under 4092 on April 2, 1992.
9. To come into conformance with the conditions of the
area variance under Appl. No. 4092, the applicant is to remove
one of the existing (residential) principal uses in exchange for
the proposed car sales establishment.
10. Certain adopted standards and criteria must be met
before a Special Exception permit may be granted in the Town of
Southold. Thus, proof must be submitted into the record to show
that the proposed use will meet all the standards imposed by the
zoning ordinance.
Page 6 - Appl. No.~19SE
Decision Rendered October
Matter of WILLIAM GOODALE
15, 1992
11. Compliance with the standards, intent and conditions of
the ordinance must be determined. It is the position of the
Board that the proof furnished thus far is not sufficient to
comply with these requirements. No proof has been submitted to
show the percentage of its business as a new car sales
establishment, as compared to the percentage of its business as
a used-car sales-leasing establishment. Additional proof must
be furnished, and the time is being extended for the applicant
to furnish that proof for an additional six (6) months from the
date of this decision.
12. Accordingly, before passing upon this application with
a final determination, the Board hereby extends the time for an
additional six (6) months for the applicant-property owner to
substantiate proof, testimony and/or other documentation as to
compliance with the requirements of the zoning code for a new
cars sales dealership, as well as proof as to the percentage of
its business for an accessory used-car sales-leasing
establishment. (The information furnished by the applicant is
not sufficient to satisfy the standards and considerations for
the grant of a Special Exception, including but not limited to
Section 100-264, subsections A through P.)
NOW, THEREFORE, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by
Mr. Doyen, it was
RESOLVED, to permit occupancy for new car sales at the
site, with used-car sales as an accessory thereto, for an
eight-month period, and that a FINAL PUBLIC HE~RING be and
hereby is scheduled to be held on or about JUNE 30, 1993,
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1) Reserving the right of the Zoning Board of Appeals to
conduct a final hearing under this application for the purposes
of reviewing proof that the applicant is a new car salesman and
allowing the Board consideration of further proof for the
purposes of adequately fulfilling the standards and criteria
necessary before a Special Exception; AND
2) Reserving the right to the Zoning Board of Appeals to
reconsider this eight-month (interim) authorization for the
purposes of determining several issues, including but not
limited to whether or not the additional proof to be submitted
will or will not adequately fulfill the requirements and
standards of the zoning laws for the proposed principal use as a
new car establishment, the percentages of business in relation
to the proposed new car establishment as well as the accessory
sales of used cars; AND
Page 7 - Appl. No. !19SE
Decision Rendered October 15,
Matter of WILLIAM GOODALE
1992
3) That there be not more than two principal uses, and the
following alternative is acceptable:
One residential use (existing on the second story of
the front house) may continue together with a first
floor office use incidental and related to a future new
dealership proposal; and
4) That the existing separate, detached residential
cottage structure in the rear yard be converted to accessory
(inactive) storage use, or be removed within three (3) years
from the date of the filing of the variance determination under
Appl. No. 4092; and
5) That the issuance of a Special Exception for a new car
sales dealership is contingent upon a final hearing and final
determination to be held on or about June 30, 1993 for the
purposes of requesting the applicant finally to submit all
up-to-date information and proof acquired during this
eight-month time period for selling of new cars from the site,
the percentage of its business in relation to both the accessory
used-car sales-leasing and the principal new car dealership,
and other standards and requirements necessary for the grant of
a final Special Exception, and other town, state, and county
regulations applicable for final approval (such as site plan
review, etc.).
6) That Covenants and Restrictions shall be:
(a) prepared in legal, recordable form executed by the
property owner, outlining an agreement between the owner and the
applicant-tenant, insuring compliance by the owner and tenant of
all conditions and requirements; and
(b) approved or modified as deemed necessary by the
Town;
(c) recorded by the owner in the Suffolk County
Clerk's Office within 30 days of the filing of this decision
with the Office of the Town Clerk, {before this approval may be
effectuated}, and the Town Board of Appeals shall be furnished
with proof of such county filing for the Town's permanent
records; and
7) That there shall be no parking of vehicles in need of
major repairs or servicing or those which are inoperable or
dismantled;
8) That the processing of the site plan before the Town
Planning Board may be held in abeyance by the applicant-property
Page 8 - Appl. No. ~19SE
Decision Rendered October 15, 1992
Matter of WILLIAM GOODALE
owner, with no substantially major or adverse alteration to the
site, its egress/ingress area and parking areas, buildings,
until such time as a final hearing on the Special Exception
standards has been held and a final determination rendered by
the Board of Appeals.
9) That the number of vehicles for sales display shall be
limited to not more than ten (10) vehicles at any one time; and
10) That the total number of vehicles on the site,
including vehicles for sales display, temporary transition
parking, employee parking, shall not exceed 18 cars or vehicles
at any one time, eight (8) of which must be parked in the rear
of the "converted storage building at the rear of the premises"
(now used as a cottage);
11) That all vehicles related to this Special Exception
must be located so as to permit adequate maneuverability, safety
at all times, proper and unobstructed ingress and egress; and
12) That all vehicles shall be placed and/or parked
on site and shall not be placed any closer than 12 feet from the
inside edge of the existing front sidewalk, or 10 feet from the
front property line, whichever is greater.
13) That there shall be no banners, flags or similar types
of cosmetic advertising; and all outdoor lighting must be for
security purposes only, without glare or disturbance to traffic
or neighboring properties; one ground or wall sign, if
proposed, must be in accordance with all sign regulations.
14) That a buffered emergency~shall be placed ten (10) feet
from the property line and twelve (12) feet from the front
sidewalk, whichever is the greater distance. This can be
accomplished by a single line of six (6) ft. "railroad ties" (or
better as may be substituted by the ZBA), and shall be situated
parallel with the property line along the Main Road. This
provision shall not be deemed an approval of any specific
setback and the Board reserves its right to make further
adjustments of setbacks at the time of the final hearing.
15) That in the event code violations exist or are found
which are contrary to other regulations of the Southold Town
Code, or which are contrary to the conditions herein, this
Page 9 - Appl. No.·19SE
Decision Rendered October 15, 1992
Matter of WILLIAM GOODALE
interim determination shall not preclude any proceeding taken by
the Town to enforce the same, now or in the future.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs.
(Abstained: Member Wilton, newly appointed 10/6/92).
lk
×:J.GERARD P. GOEHR:INGER, ~IRMAN
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
From:
RE:
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTt L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
Orlowski, Jr. Chairman i~tf~
Bennett
William Goodale and Mattituck Auto Center, Inc.
Route 25, Laurel
SCTM# 1000-122-6-30.1
ZBA Appl. No. 4120
Date: July 24, 1992
Fax (516) 765q823
This is in response to your memorandum of July 14, 1992,
requesting the Planning Board's comments on this appeal.
The Planning Board is opposed to the requested variance
from the zoning ordinance for relief from the twenty five (25)
foot front yard landscaping provision of the Code.
This site is in the entrance "corridor" of the Mattituck
Business District and the Town, It has been identified as an
area in need of visual improvement and upgrading. Both business
neighbors, th~ Suffolk Times to the east and the Shopping Plaza
to the west have front yard landscaped areas of 25' or more.
In addition to the above noted sites,the follOwing nearby
businesses have also followed or exceeded this standard:
North Fork Bankcorporation, 40'
Stype Insurance Company (proposed),
Silkworth and Brisotti, 40'
35'
· McDonalds (proposed), 140'
We are aware that this proposal involves adapting an existing
site to a new use. However, the nature of the new use should not
dictate site design in violation of the zoning code. The last
site plan for a new automobile dealership that was approved by
this Board was Lucas Ford where setbacks of 145' for the
building and 60' for front yard landscaping were observed. Here,
the lot is of sufficient size to permit outside storage and
display of cars without reducing the front yard setback of 25'
Finally, we note that the business certificate from the
State for the new and used car dealership expires in five
months, (December 1992). Further, the dealership agreement
between the Solar Car Corporation and the Mattituck Auto
Center leaves unanswered the main question, which is, "Does this
new car dealership constitute a primary use? The agreement does
not indicate the number of solar cars that must be displayed or
sold.
The Zoning Code says that there must be a primary use of a
new car dealership in order for there to be an accessory use of
used car sales. Presumably this means that the new car business
is the principal business relative to the used car business in
terms of dollars in sales and volume. The evidence in your file
as of this date does not show the new car dealership to be a
primary use.
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
May 29, 1992
J. Kevin McLaughlin,
1050 Youngs Avenue
P.O. Box 1210
Southold, NY 11971
Esq.
Re: Appl. No. 4093 - Special Exception (New and Used Cars)
Dear Mr. McLaughlin:
Please find attached a copy of the Board's determination
rendered in the above matter.
Copies of this determination have also been furnished this
date to Planning Board the Building Department for their
permanent records.
Very truly yours,
Linda Kowalski
Enclosure
Copies of Decision to:
Southold Town Building Departme~
Southold Town Planning Board~
Suffolk County Department of Planning
Town Attorney's Office
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, .Ir.
.lames Dinizio, .Ir.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
SCOTF L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
ACTION OF THE BOARD I~tl
Appl. No. 4093. S0UTHOLDf?,~
PLANNINGg~>t 3
Application in behalf of WILLIAM GOODALE, as owner, and
RICHARD GOODALE (Tenant) for a Special Exception to the Zoning
Ordinance, Article X, Section 100-101B(12) for a permit
authorizing: (a) a new car sales establishment; (b) an
establishment of an accessory use incidental to the proposed new
car sales establishment for the sale and/or lease of use
vehicles, (c) outside display of vehicles, (d) accessory
office use incidental to the new principal use as a new car
sales establishment. The subject premises is located in the "B"
General Business Zone District and a Pre-Certificate of
Occupancy indicates that the premises has been improved and
occupied with two principal buildings, each with one
single-family dwelling use. Location of Property: 7655 Main
Road, Laurel (near Mattituck), NY; County Tax Map Parcel No.
1000-122-06-30.1 (previously 30).
WHEREAS, after due notice, a public hearing was held on
March 25, 1992, and at said hearing all those who desired to be
heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and
WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentation concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, Board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding
areas; and
WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact and
determination:
1. The premises in question is located in the "B" General
Business Zone District in the Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of
Southold, and is more particularly identified on the Suffolk
County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 122, Block 6, Lot 30.1
(previously 30).
2. The subject parcel contains a total area of 36,155 sq.
ft. (.83 acre) with a frontage of 120.0 feet along the north
side of State Route 25 (Main Road). The average depth of the
Pa~e 2 - Appl. No. O93-SE (Goodale)
Decision Rendered May 18, 1992
side of State Route 25 (Main Road). The average depth of the
parcel is 402+- feet. This parcel is improved with two
principal structures, each containing a nonconforming
single-family residential use, which structures were built prior
to April 23, 1957 and are shown on the April 11, 1986 survey
prepared by Anthony W. Lewandowski, L.S.
3. This is a variance application appealing the MARCH 2,
1992 Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval concerning the
lot area requirement for a proposed third principal use. The
third use proposed will require a Special Exception from this
Board, which is pending at this time under Application Number
4093, for:
(a) proposed outside sales, storage, parking and
display of used cars and other used vehicles;
(b) proposed sales, leasing, and business office
uses, to be located as a secondary principal use in the front
building, in addition to the existing principal residential use
of this building and existing principal residential use of the
rear cottage structure. The square footage of the building area
intended for office sales and business uses is 662 sq. ft., and
the use of the existing residence would be limited to
approximately 640 sq. ft. (the second floor only of the front
building).
4. Reference is made to the following requirements of
the zoning code and other zoning information relative to this
project and premises:
(a) a Pre-1957 Certificate of Occupancy ~Z10885 dated
March 1, 1982 relates to two nonconforming one-family dwellings
with accessory storage;
(b) Certificate of Occupancy #Z12534 dated June 11,
1984 relates to an addition to the existing one-family dwelling
for residential/storage purposes. At the time of issuance of
this Certificate, no uses were established at the premises
except for two single-family residences;
(c) subsequently, on June 4, 1986, an application was
made to the Board of Appeals under the bulk schedule of the
zoning code {our File No. 3521} for permission to reduce living
area in one of the nonconforming dwelling units in order to add
an accessory home occupation, to wit: lawyer's office for
Andrew Goodale which in 1986 would be permitted only as an
accessory to the residence of the professional. The accessory
home occupation (lawyer's office) was proposed to be located
within the existing residential area of the front principal
P~ge 3 - Appl. No. 93-SE (Goodale)
Decision Rendered 18, 1992
building, without physical enlargement of the principal
structure and without expansion of any nonconforming living
areas remaining at the premises. The Bulk Schedule of the
zoning code (Section 100-31) in 1986 required a minimum livable
area of 850 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. A variance was granted
to allow a reduction in the livable floor area of the dwelling
unit to 767 sq. ft., however, no occupancy was made by Andrew
Goodale, the owner/applicant in 1986. It is personal knowledge
of board members that the premises was used solely for
single-family residential occupancy, without change for an
accessory home occupation-lawyer's office, as the permit records
show over the years. Although there was some interest in 1986
to add the accessory lawyer's office, the interest was abandoned
by Andrew Goodale over the next year or so.
(d) Later, in 1991, a third new principal use was
added, without town approvals, for used-car sales and leasing.
(e) On October 31, 1991, an application for a Special
Exception was applied for under Appl. No. 4066 requesting a
permit to sale, store, display and park used cars and used
vehicles. That Special Exception permit was denied on Decem-
ber 16, 1991 for several reasons (please see specifics of
determination filed with the Town Clerk on January 9, 1992}.
At this time, area variances were necessary for this new use on
this parcel. Also, it should be noted that proposed used car
sales and leasing establishments are permitted only as an
accessory use to a new car sales establishment or dealership --
which proof was not substantiated in the record.
(Approvals are also necessary by the Town Planning Board under
the site plan regulations of the zoning code, as well as the
Town Building Department, and other County and State governing
agencies.~
5. The provisions of the zoning code under which this
application has been made is Article X, Section 100-101B(12)
which reads as follows:
.... 100-101B. Uses permitted by special exception by
the Board of Appeals. The following uses are
permitted by the Board of Appeals, as hereinafter
provided, subject to site plan approval by the
Planning Board: ...
(12) Public garages, gasoline service stations,
new and used motor vehicle lots, vehicle sales and
Page 4 - Appl. No. a~y 3-SE (Goodale)
Decision Rendered M 18, 1992
trailers and boat sales, with accessory repair
facilities, all subject to the following requirements:
(a)
Entrance and exit driveways shall have an
unrestricted width of not less than twelve
(12) feet and not more than thirty (30) feet
and shall be located not less than ten (10)
feet from any property line and shall be so
laid out as to avoid the necessity of any
vehicle backing out across any public
right-of-way.
(b)
Sale of used vehicles or boats shall be
conducted only as accessory to the sale of
vehicles or boats.
new
(c)
Vehicle lifts or pits, dismantled autombiles,
boats and vehicles and all parts or supplies
shall be located within a building.
(d)
Ail service or repair of motor vehicles, other
than such minor servicing as change of tires or
sale of gasoline or oil, shall be conducted in
a building.
(e)
The storage of gasoline or flammable oils in
bulk shall be located fully underground and not
less than thirty-five (35) feet from any
property line other than the street line.
(f)
No gasoline or fuel pumps or tanks shall be
located less than fifteen (15) feet fro any
street or property line.
(g)
Outdoor area lighting shall be that generally
required for security purposes and shall be
restricted to the front one-third (1/3) of the
lot depth. All outdoor lighting shall be
located at a height of not more than fourteen
(14) feet above ground level and so directed
that illumination should not extend beyond lot
lines.
h)
No gasoline service or repair shops or similar
businesses are to be located within three
hundred (300) feet of a church, public school,
library, hospital, orphanage or rest home...
6. Section 100-101C, subsections (1-4) of the General "B"
Business zoning regulations provide for specific uses which are
Page 5 - Appl. No
Decision Rendered
~3-SE (Goodale)
18, 1992
also permitted -- only as accessory uses and subject to site
plan review. The used car sales and leasing and principal sales
office use are uses addressed in the Zoning Code as accessory
uses to a new car sales establishment or dealership. These uses
are not permitted, of course, as an accessory to any residence
or other principal uses.
7. At this point in time, the applicant/owner and/or
tenant has not obtained an amended license by the State of New
York or any other licensing or permit agencies to establish a
new car establishment or dealership under the facility name
"Mattituck Auto Center" or Richard W. Goodale. This
documentation is necessary. The only documentation submitted is
an (unreceipted) copy of an application to be filed for an
amendment to the "used car sales license."
Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by
Messrs. Villa and Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED, that the Special Exception be and hereby is
DENIED for the above-stated reasons, without prejudice (to
reapply by July 31, 1992).
In the event an application is being re-filed for a Special
Exception, the application must be filed by the owner and/or
authorized tenant, or a person or corporation having a direct
interest in the property. In order to comply with Condition
No. 4 of the area variance for alternative relief under Appl.
No. 4092, the application for a Special Exception permit must be
filed, together with appropriate licensing documentation, not
later than July 31, 1992 (which is "...120 days from the area
variance determination").
Vote of the Board:
Dinizio and Goehringer.
margin).
Ayes: Messrs. Villa, Doyen, Grigonis,
This resolution was duly adopted (5 0
1050 ¥oungs Ave.~ ~0 Box 1210
$outhold, ~ew York 11971
765-6085
May 15, 1992
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
RE:
GOODALE AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP
7655 Main Road, Laurel
Zoning District: General Business
SCTM~ 1000-122-6-30.1
(B)
Gentlemen:
I have been given a copy of your May 8, 1992 letter to
Garrett Strang. In the future, kindly send me a copy of all such
correspondence, as I am the attorney of record for the applicant.
It would seem appropriate at this time for the applicant and
his representatives to meet directly with the Planning Board to
discuss the proposed site plan and, in particular to attempt to
resolve the issue of the front yard landscaped area. I believe
that Section 100-254 of the Town Code provides for such a pre-
submission conference and, although request therefore was made to
you by my letter dated March 3, 1992, no such sit-down conference
has been held.
I would suggest that such a conference would be most
appropriate at one of the Planning Board's work sessions, at
which time all relevant issues could be explored in depth.
Please advise me of the date of the work session for ~ich this
matter will be scheduled.
Ve ~y//~t ~u
Garrett A. Strang
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
(~eorge Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 7654938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOWl' L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Mr. Garrett A. Strang, Architect
Main Road P.O. Box 1412
Southold NY 11971
May 8, 1992
RE:
Used Car Business
800' West of Factory Ave.
on Route 25, Laurel
Zoning District: General
Business (B)
SCTM~ 1000-122-6-30.1
Dear Mr. Strang:
This letter is in response to your request for Board review
of an alternative parking arrangement for the front yard car
display area.
The sketch that you submitted shows a five foot front yard
landscaped area. Town Code 100-212 B requires a twenty five foot
front yard landscaped area in this General Business zone.
This standard has been uniformly followed by the nearby
businesses in this business district.
1. North Fork Bancorporation
2. Stype Insurance Company
3. Silkworth and Brisotti
4. McDonald's Restaurant
5. Suffolk Times Building
6. Sterling Idea Ventures (Shopping Center)
In addition to the above, the Hobby House will landscape
their front yard if they add a new use to the site.
Enclosed for your~consideration is a sketch of an
alternative front yard parking arrangement that respects the
required setback and a tax map of the properties mentioned above.
If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please
contact this office.
Very truly yours,
nett Orlowski, Jr. ~'--
Chairman
cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
Enc.
4
/
/
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-I809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOnFI' L. HARRIS
Superwsor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516~ 765-1800
April 27, 1992
J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esq.
1050 Youngs Avenue
P.O. Box 1210
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Appl. No. 4092 (Area Variance) - William C. Goodale
Dear Mr. McLaughlin:
I am in receipt of your letter dated April 20, 1992
concerning Condition No. 2 of this Board's April 2, 1992
determination.
Condition No. 2 does not prevent the property owner or his
attorney-agent from filing applications in the future in the
event the rear building is to be converted from accessory
storage to another use. In the event no future applications are
made to all agencies (Planning, Zoning, Building, County and/or
State) involved for such conversion, then the building must be
limited to an accessory storage building as restricted by the
Code if it is not removed from the property.
As of this date, the Special Exception application under
Appl. No. 4093 has not been finalized, and we will keep you
advised of developments.
lk
cc:
Very truly yours,
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER
CHAIRMAN
Harvey A. Arnoff, _.Town Attorney
Planning Board~,-'~
Building Inspectors
~(~%~K~X~'X~J~XR°X 1050 Youngs Ave., PO Box
~a~j~~ Southold, New York 11971
765-6085
1210
April 20, 1992
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Attn. Gerard P. Goehringer,
Chairman
RE: APPL. NO. 4092 - WILLIAM C. GOODALE (AREA VARIANCE)
Dear Mr. Goehringer:
I am in receipt of the findings and determination of the
Board of Appeals in the above-referenced matter.
We have no problem with the condition contained in paragraph
numbered 2 on page 4, regarding the discontinuance of the
existin~ rear residential use within three (3) years. The
phrasing of the condition to only allow accessory storage or
removal of the building is of concern. We would like to be able
to use the rear building in conjunction with the motor vehicle
sales for any use allowable under the zoning ordinance, subject
to obtaining necessary approvals therefore. Restricting us
solely to accessory storage would seem to prohibit the use of any
portion of said building for additional office space in the
future for instance.
Please contact me
review this letter, so
cc: Richard Goodale
after you have had the opportunity to
that we may discuss this .issue~
Very ~1,~/~oq~r s,
, '/. , ,/,/' i ,
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
Appl. No. 4092.
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
ACTION OF THE BOARD
SCOT'FL. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (.516) 765-1823
Telephone (516} 765-1800
SOUTFIOLD TOWN
PLANNIN~
Application in behalf of WILLIAM GOODALE, as owner, and
RICHARD GOODALE (Tenant) for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance,
Article XXIV, Section 100-102, Bulk Area Schedule, for
permission to ~ocate-a third~rinciq~al use or~-this 36,155 sq.
ft. parcel. Third principal use is for the establishment of new
car sales and for the establishment of an accessory use
incidental to the new car sales establishment for the sale
and/or lease of used vehicles. Also, as an alternative, a
variance is necessary to substitute the proposed vehicle
sales/lease uses for one of the existing residential uses. The
subject premises is located in the "B" General Business Zone
District and a Pre-Certificate of Occupancy indicates that the
premises has been improved and occupied with two principal
buildings, each with one single-family dwelling use. Location
of Property: 7655 Main Road, Laurel (near Mattituck), NY;
County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-122-06-30.1 (previously 30).
WHEREAS, after due notice, a public hearing was held on
March 25, 1992, and at said hearing all those who desired to be
heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and
WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentation concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, Board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding
areas; and
WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact and
determination:
1. The premises in question is located in the "B" General
Business Zone District in the Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of
Southold, and is more particularly identified on the Suffolk
County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 122, Block 6 Lot 30 1
(previously 30). ' '
2. The subject parcel contains a total area of 36,155 sq.
ft. (.83 acre) with a frontage of 120.0 feet along the north
· Page 2 - Appl. No. 4092
Decision Rendered April 2,
Matter of WILLIAM GOODALE
1992
side of State Route 25 (Main Road). The average depth of the
parcel is 402+- feet. This parcel is improved with two
principal structures, each containing a nonconforming
single-family residential use, which structures were built prior
to April 23, 1957 and are shown on the April i1, 1986 survey
prepared by Anthony W. Lewandowski, L.S.
3. This is a variance application appealing the MARCH 2,
1992 Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval concerning the
lot area requirement for a proposed third principal use. The
third use proposed will require a Special Exception from this
Board, which is pending at this time under Applicanion Number
4093, for:
{a) proposed outside sales, storage, parking and
display of used cars and other used vehicles;
(b) -proposed s~esT, leasing7 and business o~fice
uses, to be tocaned as a secondary principal use in nne ~ront
building, in addition to the existing principal residential use
of this building and existing principal residential use of the
rear cottage structure. The square footage of the building area
intended for office sales and business uses is 662 sq. ft., and
the use of the existing residence would be limited to
approximately 640 sq. ft. (the second floor only of the front
building).
4. Reference is made to the following requirements
the zoning code and other zoning information relative to this
project and premises:
of
(a) a Pre-1957 Certificate of Occupancy 9Z10885 dated
March 1, 1982 relates to two nonconforming one-family dwellings
with accessory storage;
(b) Certificate of Occupancy %Z12534 dated June 11,
1984 relates to an addition to the existing one-family dwelling
for residential/storage purposes. At the time of issuance of
this Certificate, no uses were established at the premises
except for two single-family residences;
(c) subsequently, on June 4, 1986, an application was
made to the Board of Appeals under the bulk schedule of the
zoning code {our File No. 3521} for permission to reduce living
area in one of the nonconforming dwelling units in order to add
an accessory home occupation, to wit: lawyer's office for
Andrew Goodale which in 1986 would be permitted only as an
accessory to the residence of the professional. The accessory
home occupation (lawyer's office) was proposed to be located
within the existing residential area of the front principal
building, without physical enlargement of the principal
structure and without expansion of any nonconforming living
P~ge 3 - Appl. No. 4092
Decision Rendered April 2,
Matter of WILLI~,! GOODALE
1992
areas remaining at the premises. The Bulk Schedule of the
zoning code (Section 100-31) in 1986 required a minimum livable
area of 850 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. A variance was granted
to allow a reduction in the livable floor area of the dwelling
unit to 767 sq. ft., however, no occupancy was made by Andrew
Goodale, the owner/applicant in 1986. It is personal knowledge
of board members that the premises was used solely for
single-family residential occupancy, without change for an
accessory home occupation-lawyer,s office, as the permit records
show over the years. Although there was some interest in 1986
to add the accessory lawyer's office, the interest was abandoned
by Andrew Goodale over the next year or so.
{d) Later, in 1991, a third new principal use was
added, without town approvals, for used-car sales and leasing,
and for which a Special ExcepTion application has been requested
and is separately Dending~ {~pProV~ls-are al~o necessary by the
Tow~ Planning Bo~r~ under the site plan requlations of the
zoning code, as well as the Town Building ~epartment, and other
County and State governing agencies.}
5. Article XXIV, Bulk and Minimum Lot Size, Density
Schedules, etc. require 30,000 sq. ft. of land area for each
residential unit in this "B" Zone District, for a normal
requirement of 60,000 sq. ft. The requirement for a third
principal use is the same, i.e. 30,000 sq. ft. Combined, the
total lot area required for three principal uses is 90,000 sq.
ft. of land area -- for which this variance has been requested.
6. Alternatively, the applicant has agreed to substitute
one of the existing (residential) principal uses in exchange for
the proposed new car sales establishment with incidental
accessory uses. The lot area requirement will not be reduced
from that as exists with two principal uses on this 36,155 sq.
ft. nonconforming lot.
7. In considering the area variance standards for three
uses on this 36,155 sq. ft. parcel, the Board finds:
(a) that the practical difficulties claimed are not
sufficient to grant the entire relief requested, and the
practical difficulties claimed as a ground for this variance has
been created by the owner/tenant -~ not uniquely related to the
land as required by the standards set for such area variances;
(b) that there is an alternative available for
appellant to pursue, as noted below, to exchange one of the
existing principal uses for the proposed new car sales;
(c) that the grant of third use will essentially
change the character of the neighborhood and will be
incompatible with the overall plan and policy for development of
Page ~ - Appl. No. 4092
Decision Rendered April 2,
[4atter of WILLIAM GOODALE
1992
the town; conditions as such would be distinctly different from
Chose existing in the locality by adding problems incident to an
increase in density;
(d) that the difficulties for a third use are
self-created since the landowner is bound by the applicable
provisions of the ordinance and by the facts and circumstances
concerning the use of his property;
(e) that the amount of relief requested for a third
principal use is substantial in relation to the requirements --
increasing the nonconformance by approximately 80% over that
which exists.
(f) that the landowner is not deprived of a
reasonable return on his land and is not prevented from using
the land;
(g) that proof has not been submitted as to actual
dollars and cents which is necessary under the circumstances to
show the extent of practical difficulties claimed to be suffered;
(h) that in view of the manner in which the
difficulty arose and in consideration of all the above factors,
the interests of justice will be served by denying the entire
relief requested, but granting alternative relief as described
below.
NOW, THEREFORE, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by
Mr. Goehringer, it was
RESOLVED, to DENY the entire relief as requested for a
third principal use, and ALTERNATIVELY APPROVE relief to permit
a total of two principal uses instead of three principal uses,
as applies to the insufficient lot area of this parcel, SUBJECT
TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS:
1. That there be not more than two principal uses, and the
following alternative is acceptable:
One residential use (existing on the second story of
the front house) may continue together with a first
floor office use incidental and related to a future new
dealership proposal; and
2. That the existing rear residential cottage structure
shall be converted to accessory storage use or removed within
three (3) years from the date of the filing of this variance
determination; and
· Page 5 - Appl. No.
Decision Rendered April 2, 1992
Matter of WILLIAM GOODALE
3. That this area variance is contingent upon receiving
and meeting all other standards and requirements for a Special
Exception, site plan, and other state/county regulations.
4. That Covenants and Restrictions shall be prepared in
legal form, submitted to the Board of Appeals, for approval by
town counsel, within 120 days of this determination, and
recorded with the Suffolk County Clerk's Office before
effectuating this approval; and
5. That all requirements must be met and final site plan
approval be obtained in accordance with the site plan adopted by
the Southold Town Planning Board.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Dinizio, Doyen, Grigonis
and Goehringer. Nay: Member Villa. This resolution was duly
adopted. (4-t margin)~ _ .....
lk
GERARD p. GOEHRINGER, CHAIP2fAN
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski~ Jr.~ Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G, Ward
Mark S, McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCO'UF L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
.April 15, 1992
J. Kevin McLaughlin
Attorney at Law
1050 Youngs Ave.
P.O. Box 1210
Southold NY 11971
RE:
Goodale used car
dealership
7655 Main Road, Laurel
Zoning district: General
Business (B)
SCTM# 1000-122-6-30.1
Dear Mr. McLaughlin:
The Planning Board has received your letter dated March 3,
1992, requesting a pre-submission conference.
This letter will confirm your meeting of April 1, 1992,
with staff member Robert Kassner.
The following changes are recommended to the above
mentioned proposed site plan.
Landscaping must be installed along and contiguous
to the front lot line of the property, as per Town
Code 100-212 B. (See enclosed sketch for concept).
Suitable barriers must be placed between the parked
cars and the landscaped area.
3. Drainage and drainage calculations for the paved areas.
4. Dumpster location must be shown.
5. Any proposed outdoor lighting must be shown.
A sketch to scale, showing color, of any proposed out
door sign. Sign may not be internally lit.
In addition to the above, curb cut approval from the New
York State Department of Transportation, and approval from
Suffolk County Department of Health Services must be obtained.
The above should not be considered as a complete listing of
all elements of the site plan. Further comments may be
forthcoming when the Board receives and reviews the actual site
plan.
The Board would like to know if any work on the cars will
be conducted on the premises. If so, where will this work be
done?
If you require further information, or wish to meet with my
staff to further clarify any of the above items, please contact
this office.
Enc.
cc:
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~
Chairman
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Board of Appeals
Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney
~)~0~X~ 1050 Youngs Ave., PO Box
kg{~R~X~{~f~X Southold, new York 11971
765-6085
1210
March 31, 1992
Board Of Appeals
Town Of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Attn. Gerard P. Goehringer,
Chairman
RE: William Goodale Proposed Car Sales at Mattituck
Dear Mr. Goehringer:
I am in receipt of your letter to me dated March 30, 1992.
In order to clarify the record in this matter, I have
enclosed a copy of my letter to the Southold Town Planning Board
dated March 3, 1992, which was hand-delivered to said Board on
that date, along with a copy of the site plan. As you can see, I
requested a pre-submission conference with the Planning Board,
pursuant to Section 100-254 of the Town Code, prior to the formal
submission of a site plan application. To date, I have received
absolutely no response from the Planning Board to my request.
I have no problem with submitting a site plan application
this matter. However, I had hoped that the pre-submission
conference might clarify issues and, hopefully, expedite the
review of the subject site plan.
formal site plan
cc: Southold Town
At the request of the Board Of Appeals, I will now submit a
application.
./')/
Very/tr l~y~0u s /
Board
Planning
Southold Town Attorney
,:',PR- i
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PtANNING BOARD
X~IiK~Q~XI(~4(~K]~.A%gKI~A 1050 Youngs Ave. PO Box 1210
X~Ii~)[~XX~w Southold, NY 11971
765-1410
March 3, 1992
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
Goodale-new car dealership with accessory
used car sales at 7655 Main Road, Laurel
Gentlemen:
I have enclosed a copy of the site plan map, which has been
filed with the Board of Appeals regarding applications for a
special exception and a variance.
This site plan map is being filed with you pursuant to
Section 100-254 of the Town Code and at the request of the
Board of Appeals for a preliminary conference.
Please advise me of the
at your earliest convenience.
date of the preliminary conference,
Very tru rs ~
$OUTHOLD
1050 Youngs Ave., PO Box 1210
Southold, new York 11971
765-6085
March 31, 1992
Board Of Appeals
Town Of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Attn. Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
RE: William Goodale Proposed Car Sales at Mattituck
Dear Mr. Goehringer:
I am in receipt of your letter to me dated March 30, 1992.
In order to clarify the record in this matter, I have
enclosed a copy of my letter to the Southold Town Planning Board
dated March 3, 1992, which was hand-delivered to said Board on
that date, along with a copy of the site plan. As you can see, I
requested a pre-submission conference with the Planning Board,
pursuant to Section 100-254 of the Town Code, prior to the formal
submission of a site plan application. To date, I have received
absolutely no response from the Planning Board to my request.
I have no problem with submitting a site plan application in
this matter. However, I had hoped that the pre-submission
conference might clarify issues and, hopefully, expedite the
review of the subject site plan.
At the request of the Board Of Appeals,
formal
cc:
I will now submit
site plan application.
'e~y/
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Attorney
APR- i
iI~NNNHOLO TOWN
lNG BOARD
X~iO~X~]~XK]~.Ii~X~!!~ 1050 YounGs Ave. PO Box 1210
X~I[~XX~ Southold, NY 11971
{~la~ k~X'k°~X 765-1410
March 3, 1992
Southold Town PlanninG Board
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
Goodale-new car dealership with accessory
used car sales at 7655 Main Road, Laurel
Gentlemen:
I have enclosed a copy of the site plan map, which has been
filed with the Board of Appeals regarding applications for a
special exception and a variance.
This site plan map is beinG filed with you pursuant to
Section 100-254 of the Town Code and at the request of the
Board of Appeals for a preliminary conference.
Please advise me of the date of the preliminary conference,
at your earliest convenience.
?~ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
J. Kevin McLaughlin,
P.O. Box 1210
Southold, NY 11971
Esq.
March 30, 1992
~LANNING BOARD
Re: William Goodale Proposed Car Sales at Mattituck
Dear Mr. McLaughlin:
This letterxconfirm telephone communications from my office
that today the Planning Boar~ office has reported that it has
not received a completed application form for site plan
approval.
It is requested that the appropriate application forms
supplement your submission to the Planning Board since the
Planning Board office has not deemed the documents submitted by
you on March 5, 1992 as an formal application. It will also be
necessary for you to request a preliminary conference with the
Planning Board members to discuss the layout of the site plan
elements under their jurisdiction as well, before proceeding
further under the Special Exception application.
By way of a copy of this letter, we ask that the Planning/
Board please provide us with copies of all communications
concerning this project as the application process develops.
Very truly yours,
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER
CHAIRMAN
cc: Planning Board, Attn: V. Scopaz and R. Kassner
Building Department
1050 Youngs Ave. PO Box 1210
Southold, NY 11971
765-1410
March 3, 1992
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Goodale-new car dealership with accessory
used car sales at 7655 Main Road, Laurel
Gentlemen:
I have enclosed a copy of the site plan map, which has been
filed with the Board of Appeals regarding applications for a
special exception and a variance.
This site plan map is being filed with you pursuant to
Section 100-254 of the Town Code and at the request of the
Board of Appeals for a preliminary conference.
Please advise me of the date of the preliminary conference,
at your earliest convenience.
Very/tru~rS~
PLANN!NG
Southold Town Board o£ Ap eals
MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SrlUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS
GERARD P, GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.
SERGE DOYEN, JR.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Appl. No. 4066.
ACTION OF THE BOARD
Application in behalf of WILLIAM GOODALE for a Special
Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article X, Section
100-101B(12) for permission to establish new use for outside,
on-premises motor vehicle sales and leasing, and related
business office, in conjunction with pre-existing nonconforming
residential use. The subject premises is located in the "B"
General Business Zone District and a Pre-Certificate of
Occupancy indicates that the premises has been improved and
occupied with two principal buildings, each with one
single-family dwelling use. This parcel contains a lot area of
36,155 sq. ft. and lot width of 120 feet. Location of
Property: 7655 Main Road, Laurel, NY; County Tax Map Parcel
No. 1000-122-06-30.1 (or 30).
WHEREAS, after due notice, a public hearing was held on
November 21, 1991 and at said hearing all those who desired to
be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and
WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentation concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, Board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding
areas; and
WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact and
determination:
1. ~he premises in question is located in the "B" General
Business Zone District in the Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of
Southold, and is more particularly identified on the Suffolk
County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 122, Block 6, Lot 30.1
(previously 30).
2. The subject parcel contains a total area of 36,155 sq.
ft. (.83 acre) with a frontage of 120.0 feet along the north
side of State Route 25 (Main Road). The average depth of the
parcel is 402+- feet. This parcel is improved with two
principal structures, each containing a nonconforming
Page 2 - Appl. 'o. 66
Application foi WIL~£AM GOODALE
Decision Rendered December 16, 1991
single-family residential use, which structures were built prior
to April 23, 1957 and are shown on the April 1t, 1986 survey
prepared by Anthony W. Lewandowski, L.S.
3. By this application, a review and determination is
requested concerning the following proposed uses, requested to
be authorized by Special Exception:
(a) prQposed outside sales, storage, parking and
display of used cars and other used vehicles;
(b) proposed sales, leasing, and business office
uses, to be located as a secondary principal use in the front
building, in addition to the existing principal residential use
of this building and existing principal residential use of the
rear cottage structure. The square footage of the building area
intended for office sales and business uses is 662 sq. ft., and
the use of the existing residence would be limited to
approximately 640 sq. ft. (the second floor only of the front
building).
4. The provisions of the zoning code under which this
application has been made is Article X, Section 100-101B(12)
which reads as follows:
.... 100-101B. Uses permitted by special exception by
the Board of Appeals. The following uses are
permitted by the Board of Appeals, as hereinafter
provided, subject to site plan approval by the
Planning Board: ...
(12) Public garages, gasoline service stations,
new and used motor vehicle lots, vehicle sales and
rental, including the sale of recreation vehicles and
trailers and boat sales, with accessory repair
facilities, all subject to the following requirements:
Entrance and exit driveways shall have an
unrestricted width of not less than twelve
(12) feet and not more than thirty (30) feet
and shall be located not less than ten [10)
feet from any property line and shall be so
laid out as to avoid the necessity of any
vehicle backing out across any public
right-of-way.
(b)
Sale of used vehicles or boats shall be
conducted only as accessory to the sale
vehicles or boats.
of new
(c) Vehicle lifts or pits, dismantled autombiles,
?age 3 - Appl. NO~060%
Application for WI~SIAM GOODALE
Decision Rendered December %6, 1991
boats and vehicles and all parts or supplies
shall be located within a building.
(d)
Ail service or repair of motor vehicles, other
than such minor servicing as change of tires or
sale of gasoline or oil, shall be conducted in
a building.
(e)
The storage of gasoline or flammable oils in
bulk shall be located fully underground and not
less than thirty-five (35) feet from any
property line other than the street line.
(f)
No gasoline or fuel pumps or tanks shall be
located less than fifteen (15) feet fro any
street or property line.
(g)
Outdoor area lighting shall be that generally
required for security purposes and shall be
~estricted to the front one-third (1/3) of the
lot depth. All outdoor lighting shall be
located at a height of not more than fourteen
(14) feet above ground level and so directed
that illumination should not extend beyond lot
lines.
(h)
No gasoline service or repair shops or similar
businesses are to be located within three
hundred (300) feet of a church, public school,
library, hospital, orphanage or rest home...
5. Reference is also made to the following requirements of
the zoning code and other zoning information relative to this
project and premises:
(a) a Pre-1957 Certificate of Occupancy ~Z10885 dated
March 1, 1982 relates to two nonconforming one-family dwellings
with accessory storage;
(b) Certificate of Occupancy 9Z12534 dated June 11,
1984 relates to an addition to the existing one-family dwelling
for residential/storage purposes. At the time of issuance of
this Certificate, no uses were established at the premises
except for two single-family residences;
(c) subsequently, on June 4, 1986, an application was
made to the Board of Appeals under the bulk schedule of the
zoning code {our File No. 3521} for permission to reduce living
area in one of the nonconforming dwelling units in order to add
an accessory home occupation, to wit: lawyer's office for
Andrew Goodale which in 1986 would be permitted only as an
accessory to the residence of the professional. The accessory
Page 4 - App]. 7. 56
Application fo£ WILL±AM GOODALE
Decision Rendered December 16, 1991
home occupation (lawyer's office) was proposed to be located
within the existing residential area of the front principal
building, without physical enlargement of the principal
structure and without expansion of any nonconforming living
areas remaining at the premises. The Bulk Schedule of the
zoning code (Section 100-31) in 1986 required a minimum livable
area of 850 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. A variance was granted
to allow a reduction in the livable floor area of the dwelling
unit to 767 sq. ft., however, no occupancy was made by Andrew
Goodale, the owner/applicant in 1986. It is personal knowledge
of board members that the premises was used solely for
single-family residential occupancy, without change for an
accessory home occupation-lawyer's office, as the permit records
show over the years. Although there was some interest in 1986
to add the accessory lawyer's office, the interest was abandoned
by Andrew Goodale over the next year or so.
(d) Subsequently in 1991, a third new principal use
was added, without town approvals, for used-car sales and
leasing, and for which this Special Exception is now being
requested. {Approvals are also necessary by the Town Planning
Board under the site plan regulations of the zoning code, as
well as the Town Building Department, and other County and State
governing agencies.~
6. Section 100-101C, subsections (1-4) of the General
Business zoning regulations provide for specific uses which are
permitted as accessory uses and subject to site plan review.
Used car sales and leasing and principal sales office use are
uses addressed in the Zoning Code as principal office use, and
are clearly not permitted as an accessory to any principal
residence or other principal uses (with the exception of an
established, on-site, new-car dealership with an area of not
less than 30,000 sq. ft. applicable to each principal use).
7. For the record, it is noted that the parcel is
nonconforming as to total area for the two principal residential
uses. The total lot area of this parcel is 36,155 sq. ft., and
the total lot area required under the current zoning code for
each residential unit under the zoning code is 30,000 sq. ft. in
this "B" Zone District, for a total requirement of 60,000 sq.
ft. The requirement for a third principal use is the same,
30,000 sq. ft. Therefore, the total lot area required for
three principal uses is 90,000 sq. ft. of land area -- which
has not been made available in this application. Such a
substantial increase in the degree of land nonconformance over
the existing established residential nonconformities is not
permitted as a matter of right and variances necessary (ref.
Article XXIV, Bulk and Minimum Lot Size, Density Schedules,
etc.).
?age 5 - Appl. No.~6~
Application for WI~AM~OODALE
Decision Rendered December 16, 1991
8. In considering this application, the Board finds that
sufficient proof has not been demonstrated, nor documentation
submitted, to show full compliance with all those conditions and
standards set forth in the Southold Town Zoning Code for such a
Special Exception request. In fact, it is understood that the
applicant/owner has not obtained authorization and is not
licensed by the State of New York or any other licensing or
permit agencies to sell new cars. Additionally, the zoning code
requires a minimum of 30,000 sq. ft. per principal use in this
business zone district, and accordingly, a minimum lot size of
90,000 sq. ft. is required before a third principal use may
occupy the premises - whether it be by Special Exception or
otherwise.
NOW, THEREFORE, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by
Mr. Goehringer, it was
RESOLVED, that the Special Exception be and hereby is
DENIED, as noted above and additionally noted below:
1. There is insufficient square footage on the site to
support approval of a third primary or principal use;
2. The parking, service, repair and other activities
related to new-car sales and used-car sales has not been
provided on the plans and are areas of concern which normally
affect on-site circulation, traffic flow onto the Main Highway,
egress and ingress, noise levels, sanitation, pollution, and
o~her environmental considerations;
3. Mixed residential and commercial activities are not
permitted in this B General Business Zone District;
4. The lot area and premises are nonconforming as exist
since two single-family residences are not permitted on less
than 60,000 sq. ft. (30,000 sq. ft. per unit) of land area in
this B General Business Zone District;
5. The applicant has not complied with the requirements
and standards set forth in the Code for these proposed used-car
sales and related commercial operations.
Vote of the Board:
Grigonis, Dinizio and Villa.
(5 - 0 margin).
Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen,
This resolution was duly adopted
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, ~AIRMAN
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
October 31, 1991
SCOTF L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
Mr. Garrett A. Strang, R.A.
P.O. Box 1412
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Application Requesting a Special Exception
Premises of William Goodale at Main Road, Mattituck
Dear Garrett:
This letter will acknowledge receipt by our office of the
above application requesting a determination as to whether or
not this Special Exception request will meet all of the require-
ments under the zoning code for this 36,155 sq. ft. "B-General"
Business Zoned parcel for approval of a business office use,
on-premises sales/lease of motor vehicles with on-premises
display of vehicles, with pre-existing nonconforming residential
use. The Pre-Certificate of Occupancy submitted with the
~pplication indicates "two nonconforming one-family dwellings,"
ne single-family dwelling use in each of two separate building
structures).
Unless requested by you, the processing of this
application will continue, even though you have chosen not to
request a preliminary review by or file at this time with the
Planning Board for site plan approval under the site plan
regulations. Therefore, the intended business uses will be, as
you know, subject to a formal application to the Planning Board
and subject to those conditions determined by the Planning
Board.
We would like to confirm at this time that the filing and
processing of this application by the town does not waive any
other determinations or reviews necessary by the Board of
Appeals, and there is no acquiescence that the project would
meet all other regulations until a full review has beer~__ _ _
completed, tID}~ ~ ~]
/ SOUIHO[O TOWN
[[o: Garro"2t A. Si aI~7, R.A.
Re: Willi~m Goo0.ale A~plication
In the interim, please prepare and furnish to us a sketch
showing the floor layout of all uses, and the amount of square
footage to be used for the proposed business uses and
preexisting residential areas, as is to be modified and
different from that which preexisted zoning in 1957.
A public hearing has been scheduled for Thursday, Novem-
ber 2~, 1991, at approximately 7:45 p.m. and a copy of the Legal
Notice as published by our office will be forwarded to you
within the next few days. Please be aware that no postponements
will be permitted, and the owner(s) should also be present to
answer questions concerning the property and its uses.
Yours very truly,
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER
CHAIRMAN
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York I 1971
Fax (516) 765-1823
October 30, 1991
Mr. Richard Goodale
15 Fourth Street
New Suffolk, NY 11956
RE:
Used Car Business
800' West of Factory Ave.
on Route 25, Laurel
Zoning District: General
Business (B)
SCTM# 1000-122-6-30.1
Dear Mr. Goodale:
This letter is in response to your request for Board
approval of a lighting fixture attached to a utility pole.
The Board is not in favor of this type of lighting, as the
light cannot be shielded to your property. Accordingly the Board
will not grant your request.
If you have any questions, or require further information,
please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. /'-'"
Chairman
cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
SENDER:
SUBJECT:
SCTMg:
COM}4ENTS:
SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
INSPECTORS
Victor Lessard
Principal Building Inspector
Curtis Horton
Senior Building Inspector
Thomas Fisher
Building Inspector
Gary Fish
Building Inspector
Vincent R. Wieczorek
Ordinance Inspector
Robert Fisher
Assistant Fire Inspector
Telephone (516) 765-1802
OF~CE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
TO%VN OF SOUTHOLD
June 25, 1991
SCOTI' I.. HARRIS, Supervisor
Southold Town Hall '
P.O. Box 1179, 53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
Mr. Robert Goodale
665 Stillwater Avenue
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Dear Sir:
Your property on the Main Road in Laurel, Suffolk County
Tax Map #1000-122-06-33 has set up a used car business without
proper town approvals.
This enterprise requires an approved site plan from
Southold Town Planning Board. It also requires a Special
Exception from the Town Zoning Board of Appeals.
This is to be considered an Official Notice to immediately
take the proper steps to correct this condition or face legal
action.
Very truly yours,
SOUTHOLD TOWN BUILDING DEPT.
Victor Lessard,
Principal Building Inspector
VL:gar
cc to:
Southold Planning Board/
Southold Zoning Board of Appeals
SCOTT L. HARRIS
SUPERVISOR
FAX (516) 765 - 1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765 - 1800
OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISOR
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
June 24, 1991
To:
From:
Re:
Planning Department
Zoning Board of Appeals
Supervisor Scott L. Harris
Attached correspondence
I have forwarded to attached correspondence to you for your review and
comments. Once I hear from you, I will respond.
Thank you.
24¸
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
MEMORANDUM
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ~_O.~/J~
Used Car Business Route 25, Mattituck
SCTM#1000-122-6-33
DATE: June 18, 1991
During an inspection of the above referenced property on June
1991, planning staff found a used car/truck sales business in
operation.
A used car business is a use that is permitted only by Special
Exception from the Zoning Board of Appeals.
The property owner, Robert Goodale of 665 Stillwater Avenue,
Cutchogue, should be notified that he needs to apply for a
Special Exception for this use. If the Appeals Board grants the
Special Exception, the Planning Board will require that a site
plan application be filed.
cc: Vincent Wieczorek, Ordinance Inspector
Gerard Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Matthew Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney
SENDER:
SUBJECT:
SCTM~:
COMMENTS:
SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFOI~E SIGN. lNG THIS INSTRUMENT--THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY.
PT.F. ASE DO NOT PUBLISH
INDENTURE, ma& thc ~ . .day of Augu?t. , uinet~ hunted ~d eighty ~ree
BE~N
MATTITUCK AUTO BODY, a co-partnership having its principal place of business at
MAIN ROAD, (no n,,mber) P.O. BOX 270 MATTITUCK, N~ YORK 11952
party of the first part, and
ANDREW E. GOODALE, 4TH STREET, (no D.mher) NEW SUFFOLK, NEW YORK 11956 and
WILLIAM CU. GOODALE, 4TH STREET, (no number) NEW SUFFOLK, NEW YORK 11956 as
TENANTS IN COMMON AND NOT WITH THE RIGHT OF SURVIVORSHIP.
patty of the ~ond part,
WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration
paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto thc party of the second pa:t, the heirs or
successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever,
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate,
lying and being ilOMlat
at Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York,
bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Main Road distant 507.16 feet
westerly as measured along the same, from the point on the northerly side
of Main Road where the same is intersected by the westerly side of land now
or formerly of the State of New York, said point being also the westerly
side of land now or formerly of TMCK Associates;
UNNIN~ THENCE along the northerly side of Main Road, South 51 degrees
58 minutes 50 seconds West 120.00 feet to the easterly si~e of land now or
formerly of Sidney and Eleanor Packer;
~E along said lan~ the following two (2:) uourses and distances; 1. North 37 degrees 57 minutes 50 seconds West 100.00 feet, and
2. North 23 degrees 03 minutes 00 seconds West 316.82 feet;
THF~NCE North 58 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds East 39.12 feet to the westerly
side of land now or formerly of TMCK Associates; and
THENCE along said land South 37 degrees 54 minuted 20 seconds East ~
feet to the northerly side of Main Road to the point or place of BEGINNING.
BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same pre!see as those descr~ in Liber 9024
cp553 and recordnd in the Office of the Clerk, Suffolk County on J~ne 26, 1981.
TOGETHER with all right, tide and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and
roads abutting the above desedhed premires to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the ap~cee and
all the estate and rights of the ~ of th~ first lc~rt ie and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the
premises herein granted unto the party of the second ~t, the heirs or successors and assigns Of the party of the
second part forever.
AND the party of the first Part covenants that the patty of the first ~-bus not d~ne or suffered anything whereby
the said premises have beqn ~ in any w~y whatever, except as afoee~ifl.
AND the ~ty ~o~ the first i~rt, in c°mvlience with Section 13 of the Lien law, covenants ther the patty of the first
part w~l~e~V~t~_~= .i~_".~"'[his conveyance and will hold the risht to receive such consideration u a
trust fu~..t.g~ ap~fi~q~d~ of paying the cost o~ the ittlplx}ve.qlent a~l will apply the same first to
the pd~ii~ll~td~l~ e~l~ ~n~llSl, ltllla~ before u~ing any pert of the totsd of the ? for any other purpme.
The word "patty"~ll111 II~O~sttued as i~ it reed "patties" wheneves tile sense o~ thru indantm'e so eequires.
IN ~VITNE.q~ WHE~IvOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above
written.
MATTI~FJCK
AUTO
BCD]
~, a co-partnership by:
REAL ESTATE
AU~ 24Lq83
TRANSFER TAX
19 83, before
STATE OF NE~W YORK, COUNTY OF
On the day of August
pcrmnally came Harvey Bagshaw and Terr~
Woodhull
~o me known to be the individuals described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that
theyexecuted the ~me, on behalf of
MATTITUCK AUTO BODY, a co-partnership
with the principal place of business at
Notary_ Public
STATE OF NEW YORK, (~OUNTY OF 4:
On thc day of 19 , before ~
personally came
to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose lad
say that he resides at No.
that he is the
of
, the corporation de~rlbed
in and which executed the foregoing in*trument; tim he
knows the seal of said ¢orpotmtinn that the ~ affixt~:l to mid
instrument is suCh ?rpomte se~l; that it was so ~ by order
of the board of dtl'ect0r~ of ~id corpor~tina, md t~t he
signed h name thereto by like order.
~ATE OF NEW YORK, C~OUNTY OF
On the day of
personally came
19
, before me
to me known to he the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that
$TATI OF Nl~f YORK~ COUNTY OF #:
On the d~y of 19 , before me
~x:tso~lly c~me
t~ su~ibing wit~ to the fore~?g instm~nt, with who~
I ~ ~ly ~u~ ~, ~g ~ me d~y ~om, d~d
de~ and ~y t~t ~ r~id~ at ~o..
thet ~
to ~ tbe ~dividual
d~i~.in md w~ e~tM the fo~8 imtmment; t~t
~:~ t~t ~, ~d w~, at tbe ~e
ti~ ~b~ri~ h na~ as wit~
BARGAIN. AND SALE DEED
WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'$ ACT~
TITLE NO. R-959 558 S
MATTITUCK AUTO BODY
TO ANDREW E.
GOODALEL& WILLIAM C. GOOD.ALE
RCOt~EALTH LAND
TITLE INgHRANCE COMPANY
District 1000
S~CT~ON 122.00
atoc~ 06.00
u~ 030.001
COUNTY OR TOWN
Reco?ded at Request of COMMOlX0WEALTH LAND
TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Andrew E. Goodale
Main Road, BOx 15-A
Mattituck, New York
11952
Zip No.
~J
T LD
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
December 12, 1986
Mr. Andrew Goodale
Attorney at Law
7655 Main Raod
Laurel, NY 11948
Re: Site Plan Application
Andrew and William Goodale
Dear Mr. G@odale:
The Planning Board has made a review of your site plan
application. The following information must be on the survey
pursuant to Section 100-134 of the Code:
1. Drainage and calculations
2. Landscaping - including the type of street trees
3. existing utilities
4. type of paving for the driveway and parking area.
5. handicap access
6. Ingress and egress must be approved by the State
Department of Transportation. If two driveways are not
approved, the Board suggests one, with parking as noted
on the enclosure.
7. Sidewalks and curbs~
8. Outdoor lighting and outdoor signs
Upon receipt of an amended survey stamped by a licensed surveyor,
engineer, etc. we will schedule this matter on the next available
agenda.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
eno.
Southold, N.Y, 11971
(516) 765-1935
November 24, 1986
Mr. Andrew Goodale
Attorney at Law
7655 Main Road
Laurel, NY 11948
Re: Site Plan application
Andrew and William Goodale
Dear Mr. Goodale:
Please let this confirm that the Town Planner has made
a review of the site plan which you submitted.
It was requested that you incorporate the missing site
plan elements on a proper site. Please refer to Section 100-
134 of the Southold Town Code.
If you have any questions,
our office.
please d6n't hesitate to contact
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
~an~e ' M~, Secretary
Southold Town Board o£Appeals
MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 2.5 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11~'71
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS
GERARO P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.
SERGE OOYEN,~R.
ROBERT J. DOUGLASS
JOSEPH H. SAWICKI
June 12, 1986
Andrew Goodale, Esq.
Mr. William Goodale
15 Fourth Street, Box
New Suffolk, NY 11956
146
Re: Appeal No. 3521 (Variance)
Dear Messrs. Goodale:
This letter will acknowledge receipt of your recent appli-
cation. The members of the Board of Appeals will be conducting
field inspections and environmental reviews as may be required
by State and local laws prior to scheduling your application for
a public hearing.
It is requested in the interim that you ~roceed with the
[X ] Planning Board [ ] N.Y.S.D.E.C. [ ]
in order that they may submit their written comments or recom-
mendations as early as possible. Upon receipt of their input,
your application will be scheduled for the next available hear-
ing date.
If the above document(s) are submitted by late June,
it is expected that the public hearing would be held about the
middle part of July. A copy of the notice of hearings as
published in the Long Island Traveler-Watchman and the Suffolk
Times will be sent to you as confirmation.
Please feel.free to call at any time if you have any questions.
Yours very truly,
CC:
Planning BoardV/
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER
CHAIRMAN
V~.y Linda Kowalski
AUI 18 1986
Southold Town Board o£Appeals
I~AIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y, 11971
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Appeal No. 352]
Application Dated June 4, ]986
TO:
Andrew Goodale, Esq.
Mr. William Goodale
15 Fourth Street, Box 146
New Suffolk, NY 11956
[Appellant(s)]
At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on July 3], ]986,
the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken
on your [ ] Request for variance Due'to Lack. of Access to Property
New York Town Law, Section 28b-a~
[ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance
Article , Section
[×] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
Article III , Section 100-3l, Bulk Schedule
[ ] Request for
Application of ANDREW AND WILLIAM GOODALE for a Variance to the
Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for permission to reduce
living area in preexisting, nonconforming dwelling unit in th%~ "B-']"
General Business Zoning District, to less than 850 sq. ft. Location
of Property: 7655 Main Road, Laurel, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No.
1000-122-6-30.1 (or 30).
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on July 17, 1986
in the Matter of the Application of ANDREW AND WILLIAM GOODALE under
Appeal No. 3521; and
WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and
the surrounding areas; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard
were heard, and their testimony was recorded; and
WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentation submitted concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact:
1. By this application, appellant requests a Variance of
the provisions of Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedul~ of
the Zoning Code, as referred ir the Notice of Disappro~,ai dated
March 28, 1985 of the Building Inspector, for permission to reduce
the living area of this preexisting, nonconforming dwelling unit
to 767 sq. ft. (on the second level), in order to add office area
to the first floor for a total floor area for the business use
of 662 sq. ft.
2. The premises in question is located along the north
side of the Main Road (State Route 25) in the Hamlet of Matti-
tuck (near Laurel), and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax
Maps as District 1000, Section 122, Block 6, Lot 30.1 (30):'~
(CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
DATED: August 15, 1986.
Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81)
CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN
OF APPEALS
ZONING BOARD
?age 2 - Appeal No. 3521
Matter of ANDREW AND WILLIAM GOODALE
Decision Rendered July 31, 1986
.,~>. I'i~e subject premises contains a total lot area of 1.12±
acres~ with a frontage along the Main Road of 120 feet. Existing
upon the
as noted
and Certi
by sketch
and sketc
subject p
District.
involve t
time and
to expand
for a sep
subject premises are two single-family dwelling structures
by Certificate of Occupancy #Z10885 dated March 1, 1982,
ficate of Occupancy #Z12534, and more particularly shown
prepared by Anthony Lewandowski stamped April 11, 1986,
h prepared by Penny Lumber dated July 18, 1986. The
remises is located in the "B-I" General Business Zoning
It is the understanding that this application does not
he enlarging of either of the existing buildings at this
is an alteration of the first-floor to add office area
the present professional-business office use and not
arate business occupancy.
4. It is noted that one of the effects of the granting of
this variance is to reduce the nonconformity of the dwelling unit
in this structure, which is within the spirit of the zoning ordi-
nance.
iF~ considering this appeal, the board finds and determines:
(a) that the relief requested is not substantial in relation to
the zoning requirements for this business zoning district; (b)
~here will be no substantial change in the character of the
immediate area; (c) the circumstances are unique; (d) the
practical difficulties are sufficient to warrant the granting
of this variance; (e) there is no other method feasible for
appellant to pursue other than to enlarge the existing building
[which is not feasible for appellant at this time]; (f) in view
of the manner in which the difficulties arose and in considering
all the above factors~ the interests of justice will best be
served by allowing the variance, as noted below.
Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by
Mr. Sawicki~ it was
RESOLVED, that a Variance as requested under Appeal
No. ~3521 in the Matter of the Application of ANDREW AND WILLIAM
GOODALE for permission to reduce nonconforming livable floor
a~-o'--f preexisting dwelling unit to 767 sq. ft., BE AND HEREBY
iS APPROVED AS APPLIED.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen
and Sawicki. (Members Douglass and Grigonis were absent.)
This resolution was duly adopted.
lk
~I~RARI~ P-.-'I~OEI~R~'NGER, C~iRMAN
August 16, 1986
FORM NO. 3
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
SOUTHOLD, N.Y.
NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL
Date ..................... 19. .
File No ................................
To ...~.....~....~. ~.. ;...~.. ?. ~
· ./..~...~.....~........~..::? .........
.~.~. .~. j.b~.,. ~..~. ... . / / ?.~.~. .
for permit to construct...t~.~ ~.....-~.'... ~.A'~.~..~: ~...A~.~,'...~..~..~ ..... at
Location of Property . .3.~ ~.. ~ ~. ~ ........... ~ ~ ~.~. ~ ................
Hou~ No. St~t Ham/et
Co..tv ~ ~ap ~o. ]0oo s~ctio..../.~ ~ ..... moc~ .... O.G ....... ~t .~9.'. 9.qJ ....
Subdivision ................. Filed Map No ................. Lot No ..................
is returned herewith and disapproved on the following g~ounds.....~., i~...~.. ~. ~. ~ '
.....
· Building Inspector
RV 1/80
~ ( X )
';~:: ( X )
(x)
(x)
(x)
(v~ ( x )
X )
X)
x)
x)
x)
x)
x)
x)
x)
(x)
(x)
SITE PLAN ELEMENTS
§100-134 Town Code
Lot, block, and section number, if any, or the property taken from
tax records Suffolk County 1000-122-06-30.1
Name and address of the owner of record
~a~dre~ &,william ~oodale ~
e an~ anqre~ ot t~eper~on p~aring the ~ap
Surveyoy anthony ~ewanaows , Plot p±an w/office by Penny Lumbc
Date, North arrow and written and ~raphic scale 1" - 50'
April 11, 1986; North on Ke~ Map re~erence; Scale -
Sufficient description or information to precisely define the boundaries
of the property. All distances shall be in feet and tenths of a foot.
All angles shall be given to the nearest ten seconds or closer. The
error of closure shall not exceed one in ten thousand.
The locations, name, and existing wi~h of a4~ace~ s.trect~s, and curblines
See plot plan, Route 25, ~nclua~ng s~wa£K ~s ~u
The Iocation and owners of all adjoining lands, as shown on the latest
tax records
Location, width and purpose of all existing and proposed easements, setbacks,
reservations, and areas dedicated to public use withinor adjoining property.
None
A complete outline of existing deed restrictions or covenants applying to
theproperty None
Existing zoning "B-l" General Business District
Existing contours at intervals of five or less, referred to a datum
satisfactory to the Board Noted on Survey
Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflc
Not applicable
Location of existing watercourses, marshes, wooded areas, rock outcrops
isolated trees with a diameter of eight inches or measured three feet
above the base of the trunk and o£her siMnificant~existing features.
See plot plan, trees & wooGe~ ar~as no~e~. Other features N.A.
Location of uses and outlines of structures, drawn to scale on and
within one hundred (100) feet of the lots. N.A. vacant land adjoining
Paved areas, sidewalks, and wehicular access between the site and public
S~reets See plot plan, sidewalk and parking area noted
Locations, dimensions, grades and flow direction of existing sewers, culvert%
and waterlines as well as other underground and above ground utilities
within and adjacent to the property. Survey or plot plan so noted
Other existing development, including fences, landscaping a~d screening
~ee~plo~ plain, tree~, screening of shubbery as exmstmng
ine ±ocatlon oi proposee buildings or structural improvement
The location and design ofall uses not requiring structures
such as off street parking and loading areas.
~ee~plot pla~, so noted for sufficient off street parking
ine ±ocatlon, Glrection, power and time of use of any proposed outdoor
lighting or public address systems. N.A.
The location of, and plans for, any outdoor signs
~,No~e contemplated at present
ine location an~ arrangement of proposed means of access and egress,
including sidewalks, driveways or other paved areas; profiles indicating
grading and cross sections showing width of roadway, location and width
of sidewalks and lcoation and size of. water and sewer lines.
Circular access to & from premzses
OVER...
~ite plan elements cont.
(§100-134)
(X
(X
X
X
X
Any proposed grading, screening and other landscaping including types
and locations of proposed street trees. As existing on plot plan
The location of all proposed waterlines, valves and hydrants and of
all sewer lines or alternate mean~ of wager s~pply and sewage disposal
and treatment. NO proposed private aeve±opment
An outline of any proposed deed retrictions and/or covenants.
Previousl answered, N.A.
Any contemplted public improvements on or adjoining the property.
~e ~i~ntemp±ated
e developmenl plan indictes only a first stage, a supplementary
plan shall indicate ultimate develoment.N.A.
Any other information deemed by the Planning Board necessary to determine
conformity of the site plan with the intent and regulations of this chapter.
N.A. for the variance to office use
PENNY' LUMBER
MAIN ROAD -BOX 67
GREENPORT, N.Y. ! 1 ~,4
LO~ ~LO0~ T~L~H
( )
( )
( )
SITE PLAN ELEMENTS
§100-134 Town Code
Lot, block, and section number, if any, or the property taken from
tax records
Name and address of the owner of record ~
Name and address of the person preparing the ma~
Date, North arrow and written and graphic scale
Sufficient description or information to precisely define the boundarie~
of the property. Ail distances shall be in feet and tenths of a foot.
Ail angles shall be given to the nearest ten seconds or closer. The
error of closure shall not exceed one in ten thousand.
The locations, name, and existing width of adjacent streets and curblin:
The location and owners of all adjoining lands, as shown on the latest
tax records
Location, width and purpose of all existing and proposed easements, set~
reservations, and areas dedicated to public use withinor adjoining prop~
A complete outline of existing deed restrictions or covenants applying
theproperty
Existing zoning
Existing contours at intervals of five or less, referred to a datum~
satisfactory to the Board
Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater
Location of existing watercourses, marshes, wooded areas, rock outcrops
isolated trees with a diameter of eight inches or measured three feet
above the base of the trunk and other significant existing features.
Location of uses and outlines of structures, drawn to scale on and
within one hundred (100) feet of the lots.
Paved areas, sidewalks, and w~hicular access between the site and publi
streets
Locations, dimensions, grades and flow direction of existing sewers, cu
and waterlines as well as other underground and above ground utilities
within and adjacent to the property.
-Other existing development, i~cluding fences, landscaping and screening
The location of proposed buildings or structural improvement
The location and design ofall uses not requiring structures
such as off street parking and loading areas.
The location, direction, power and time of use of any proposed outdoor
lighting or public address systems.
The location of, and plans for, any outdoor signs
The location and arrangement of proposed means of access and egress,
including sidewalks, driveways or other paved areas~rofiles indicatin
grading and cross sections showing width of roadway,~location and width
of sidewalks and lcoation and size of water and sewer lines.
Site plan elements cont.
(§100-134)
Any proposed grading, screening and other landscaping including types
and locations of proposed street trees.
The location of all proposed waterlines, valves and hydrants and of
all sewer lines or alternate means of water supply and sewage disposal
and treatment.
An outline of any proposed deed retrictions and/or covenants.
Any contemplted public improvements on or adjoining the property.
If the site development plan indictes only a first stage, a supplementary
plan shall indicate ultimate develoment.
Any other information deemed by the Planning Board necessary to determine
conformity of the site plan With the intent and regulations of this chapter.