Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-122.-3-15,\ f BORING No. 1 BORING 'No. 2 ~0 ~ ~1 4 ,'~' t- O~ I b q'". A 51ff~ ~Afi"A C' ' do'TAU l~!.Jt Ls,~ ~G GLUECKE 300 WHEELER NAUPPAUGE ~EWYDRK PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southotd~ New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 November 19, 1991 David G. Young Village Marine P.O.Box 1045 Mattituck, New York 11952 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Village Marine E/s Bay Avenue, 140' S/o SR 25, Mattituck, N.Y. Dear Mr. Young: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 18, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration for this Type I action. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grants site plan approval with the condition that no building permits be issued until a copy of the Suffolk County Health Department's approval (waiver letter), and a copy of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation permit are on file in the Planning Board office. A copy of the Negative Declaration is enclosed, along with an endorsed copy of the site plan. If there are any questions, please contact this office for assistance. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. - Chairman Encls. VS: vs cc: Building Department Tax Assessor's Office TOWN CLERK TOW o so .o Suffolk County, New York Phone 516-765.1801 Southold, New York 11971 BEC IVEDOF ! I ~ ). ~ ~ J~h T. Terry, Town Clerk Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 ,D APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Application Filing Fee Date Rec'd New Use Change of Use Re-Use__Extension of Existing Use Revision of an Approved Site Plan (Date of Approval Other .Specify_ Name of Business or Site Villaqe Marine Location of Site e/s Bay Avenue~ 140' s/0 NYS Route 25 Address of Site, if available Mattituck Name of Applicant Mr. Dave Young Address of Applicant Vilaqe Marine, P.0. Box 1045 Mattituck, New York 1~952 Telephone (516) 298-5800 ~Person to be responsible for Construction David Younq Telephone (516) 298-5800 Applicant's interest in site-check one: Owner of Land ×Peter Kopke Under contract to purchase YOwner of Fee Title to Land Peter Kopke ~Address 3000 Marcus Ave Lake Success Telephone (516) 328-6800 ',Site Plans Prepared by Glueckert&Wieber License No. {Address 300 Wheeler Rd. Suite 303 Telephone_ (516) 234-4897 Hauppauge,N.Y. ********************* Total Land Area of Site 24,~02 Existing Use of Site Marina Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) ~502 sqft. Gross Floor Area of Proposed StructUre(s) 3522 sqft. Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) ~0.-~- Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) Datum(Specif¥)U.S.G.S. Other Has applicant been granted a variance a~d/or special exception by Board of Appeals Sq. Ft. Zone District Proposed Usc of Sitc---~%~n~ .... sqf~. .sqfk. % Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOARD. MAY BE ~DERT~EN UNTIL APPROVAL APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK David Young being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at in the State of New York, and t~at he is the owner of the above property or that he is the 0wner of the Village Marine (Title) (Specify whether Partnership which is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land whiCh are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. Sworn to before me this (Owner) day of ~2-- (Notary Public) ar net or Corp~officer and Title) I..~ROJEC. T,.D~NUMBER 6~7.2~ CT I 0 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Dave Young ~la.qe MarC. ne Municipality Mattituck 4.PR ECIS'-"~'~'~ ~ Co,my S~ffolk SEQi e/s Bay Avenue, 140' s/o Route 25 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: [] ModificaRon/alteratlon Adding to existing structure and building new boat racks acres Ultimately __0.55 acres 8. WI PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTtNG ZONING OR aYes [] No If No, describe briefly OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTR CTIONS? g. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial [] Agriculture Describe: Marina [] ParkJForestlOpen space [~ Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? [] Yes [] No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals 11 . DOES ANy ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLy VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [] Yes ~] No CERTIFY TH~E INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Coati As~n~o~ before p;oceedi~g ~;;~ this assessment OVER =.-~ 1 PART II--ENVIRONMFNTAL AS '~SSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCE ,NY TYPE ,RESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR. PART 6t7.127 If yes, co(~ ~ ~ rewew process and use the FULL EAF [] Yes [] NO B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If NO. a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. [] Yes [] No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WiTH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, If legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other nat.ural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as of ficially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C57 Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use ut either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. rS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO SE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS'~ [] Yes [] No if Yes, exptain briefly PART !II--DETERMiNATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or other, vise significant, Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adcquateiy addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr, Richard G. Ward Mark S, McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 MArch 6, 1992 Karen Munze, Sr. Environmental Analyst Division of Reegulatory Affairs New York State Department of Environmental Conservation State University of New York Building 40 Stony Brook, New York 11790 Re: Village Marine E/s Bay Ave., 140'S/o SR Mattituck, N.Y. SCTM # 1000-122-3-15 NYSDEC Permit # 1-4738-00341/00001-0 25 Dear Ms. Munze: This is in response to your telephone call last month regarding a discrepancy between the Planning Board's negative declaration and the accompanying site plan. The first page of the negative declaration states that the replacement building will be located 58' from the tie line of the existing bulkhead. This is a typographical error. The building is proposed to be located 28' from the tie line of the existing bulkhead. The 28' distance is noted on the approved site plan, the long environmental assessment form submitted by the applicant, and the Zoning Board's approval. I hope this information clears any confusion caused by our Negative Declaration statement. If you have further concerns, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Chairman o- % PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 January 16, 1992 John Reimers New York Telephone Co. 541 No. Ocean Avenue, Room 209 Patchogue, New York 11772 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Village Marine E/s Bay Avenue, 140' S/o SR 25, Mattituck, N.Y. SCTM # 1000-122-3-15 NYTel ~28 LILCO Pole 9101 EO 76364 Dear Mr. Reimers: On November 18, 1991, the Southold Town Planning Board granted conditional final approval to Village Marine for an amendment to their site. The proposed site plan involves relocation of the lighting and telephone pole from the entrance in order to improve vehicular traffic safety at this location. Accordingly, a copy of the proposed site plan is enclosed for your information. If your office anticipates any problems with relocating this pole, it would be greatly appreciated if you would notify Valerie Scopaz of this office as soon as possible, because construction at Village Marine is slated to begin this spring. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. VS:vs cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Arthur Apicello, Long Island Lighting Co. Dave Young, Village Marine PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 J~nuary 16, 1992 A~thur Apicello Customer Design Representative Long Island Lighting Company Doctor's Path Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Village Marine E/s Bay Avenue, 140' S/o SR 25, Mattituck, N.Y. SCTM # 1000-122-3-15 LILCO Pole ~101 EO 76364 NYTel #28 Dear Mr. Apicello: On November 18, 1991, the Southold Town Planning Board granted conditional final approval to Village Marine for an amendment to their site. The proposed site plan involves relocation of the lighting and telephone pole from the entrance in order to improve vehicular traffic safety at this location. Accordingly, a copy of the proposed site plan is enclosed for your information. If your office anticipates any problems with relocating this pole, it would be greatly appreciated if you would notify Valerie Scopaz of this office as soon as possible, because construction at Village Marine is slated to begin this spring. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. VS:vs cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector John Reimers, NY Telephone Co. Dave Young, Village Marine PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P,O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Fax (516) 765-1823 November 19, 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Village Marine SCTM#: 1000-122-3-15.1 Location: E/s Bay Avenue, 140' S/o State Route 25, Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 SEQR Status: Type I ( K ) Unlisted ( ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (K) Description of Action: To expand an enclosed working area by replacing an existing 36' by 26' metal building with a 40' by 60' metal building (an increase of 1464 square feet of floor area); to add landscaping throughout the property along with stormwater drainage and boat wash down facilities. The replacement building will be 58' from the tie line of the existing bulkhead. Planning Board SEQR Negative Declaration Con't. Reasons Supporting This Determination: There has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's Stony Brook office has stated that it has no objection to the Planning Board's initial determination of non-significance. The Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals conducted its own environmental review relative to the application for a variance for the placement of the accessory storage building which concluded that there would be no adverse effects. The $outhold Board of Town Trustees issued a permit for the proposed project on April 27, 1989, which is still valid. A condition of this permit is that all roof storm water be channeled to drywells to prevent runoff from discharging directly to James Creek. This mitigation measure has been incorporated into the proposed site plan (revised 11/14, 1991). The Planning Board finds that the proposed expansion (replacement of an existing building with a larger building) will result in an increase of 1464 square feet of floor area. However, it also finds that the following mitigation measures which are shown on the proposed site plan, will not only reduce the projected environmental impacts, but mitigate some existing impacts, as follows; 1. installation of permanent landscaping in the front yard and within the required rear/side yard buffer where none now exist; and the installation of planters along the entire length of the bulkhead; 2. the on-site containment of all surface storm water runoff for a 2 inch rainfall (to be achieved by connecting the roof runoff from the new building to drywells and by regrading the land so that it slopes (and drains) away from the bulkhead; 3. the installation of a portable pump-out facility to service the boats in the marina; 4. the addition of a boat wash-down area complete with a sediment catch basin which will be cleaned twice a year. Planning Board For Further Information: Contact Person: Valerie Scopaz Address: Southold Town Planning Board, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, N.Y. 11952 Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 CC: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Dave Morrell, DEC Commissioner Mohabir Perseud, Department of State Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Applicant TO GLUECKERT AND WIEBER ARCHITECTS 300 Wheeler Road-Suite 303 HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788 (516) 234-4897 WE ARE SENDING YOU ~ At~ached [] Under separate cover via :~]~(~ ~",/(~r~'~ the following items: [] Shop drawings I~/Prints [] Plans [] Samples [] Specifications E Copy of letter [] Change order [] COPIES DATE NO, DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ~For approval E] For your use L~As requested [] For review and comment El FOR BIDS DUE [] Approved as submitted [] Approved as noted [] Returned for corrections [] 19 [] Resubmit [] Submit [] Return copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints __ [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS SOUTHOLD TOWN PL~F?!!NG BOARD COPY TO PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham~ Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 November 13, 1991 David G..Young Village Marine P.O.Box 1045 Mattituck, New York 11952 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Village Marine E/s Bay Avenue, 140' S/o SR 25, Mattituck, N.Y. Dear Mr. Young: The Planning Board's environmental consultant has reviewed the Long Environmental Assessment form for the marina. A copy of this report is enclosed for your convenience. Page two of the report indicates that certain revisions should be made to the site plan before it is approved. First, the site grading should indicate that the property grades will slope away from the bulkhead towards the drainage basins. Second, the site plan should indicate the proposed maintenance schedule for the sediment catch basins. Third, the proposed existence and "resting" location of the portable pump out facility should be noted on the plan. Fourth, the plan should show the placement of ground cover within the 10 foot buffer area to prevent erosion of this buffer onto the adjoining right of way. Fifth, the plan should indicate how the location of the parking spaces will be marked in the field (e.g. on sides of the planters). Also, if known, the approximate height and design of the planters could be noted. Please include with the revised site plans, a copy of the permit from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the Health Department's approval. One of the revised site plans should be st~mped as approved (or waived) by the Health Department. If you could arrange for the submission of eight revised site plans in time for the November 18th meeting, it would be appreciated. ff there are any questions, please contact this office for assistance. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Enc. VS:vs cc: Tanya Lachenmeyer, The Land Use Company Gerald Anderus, Glueckert & Wieber Architects CRAMER, VOORHI~, ~,SOCIATES E NVI RO N M E NT~..~-4-1~__ ,':~ G CONSULTANTS SOUTHOLD TOWN Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Plarming Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 November 4, 1991 Re: Review of Long EAF Village Marine, SR 25, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-3-15.1 Dear Benny: As per the your request we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The project site is currently developed, and the proposed project calls for removal of an existing 940 square foot building, to be replaced with a 2,400 square foot building, with associated site improvements. Site improvements include resurfacing parking and storage areas, installation of stormwate.r, collection and leaching facilities, provision of a 10 foot landscaped buffer, and addttional landscaping. The fact that the site is currently utilized as a marina, decreases the significance of impacts of site plan amendment. Beneficial impacts are recognized due to the control of site runoff. Inspection of the existing facility finds that silt and runoff accumulation is occurring south of the existing 940 square foot shed, in an area where engine repair and boat washing is conducted. In addition, it is noted that boats are stored and displayed in areas set aside for future parking. The proposed site improvements, are anticipated to generally provide net environmental benefit for the reasons noted above. The following recommendations should also be considered by the Planning Board in deliberations on this project: 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Page 1 Village Marine, Mattituck Long EAF Review Runoff must be directed away from the surface water and toward sediment catch basins. The site plan seems to indicate that a planter will be used adjacent the bulkhead, to create a barrier to runoff. The elevation and intent of the barrier should be more clearly depicted on the plan in order to assist in assuring compliance during future inspections. Sediment catch basins must be maintained to be effective. The applicant should establish a maintenance schedule and indicate a proposed contractor who will be on call to conduct such maintenance. * Due to the need for a variance from required parking, the parking stalls which are proposed must be clearly marked and must remain accessible. The NYSDEC has a p. olicy of requiring a pump out facility for marina installation and mod~fication projects. The NYSDEC is an involved agency and will issue permits based upon their review. If a pump out facility is not proposed, the applicant should provide justification in terms of demand and facility use in order to assist the Town in determining the appropriateness of this potentially beneficial consideration. The 10 foot landscaped buffer may receive some runoff. Due to existine and proposed grades of the parking area and catch basin, runoff should not 'fie permitted to leave the site. Groundcover should be specified for this area, and a means of ensuring that runoff will not leave the site should be provided. The proposed project is in a Critical Environmental Area, in recognition area sensitivity. As indicated, with proper consideration, the proposed amendments could provide a net environmental benefit. We feel that a Negative Declaration could be appropriate for the subject application, in accordance with the Criteria for Determinin Sign. ificance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, provided specific measures noted ab~gve are incorporated into the proposed project. I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to complete review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. enc: Part I/II LEAF CRAMER, VOORHIS &ASSOC ATES ENVIRONMENTAE..~D E~I~,[NG CONSULTANTS Very t~op'~ours, ~.~ Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Page 2 617.21 Appandlx A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE$S~¢IENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full i. AF ~s designed to help applicants and agenciesdeterm,ne, .~ an orderl.,, manner, whether a proiect or achon may be s~gmhcar, t Th~ question o[ whether ~n achon may be ~igmficant ,s not always e~s~ to answer Frequent. fy, there are aspects of a p~oject tha~ ~re ~ubjecbve oF unmeasureab~e I~ ~s also understood that those w~o detem~ne ~ignificance may have tltde ot no fo~ma[ knowledge of tho environment r,r may be techmcalJy expert in envlronmenLM analysis Inadditio~,manywhohaveknowJedg~moaeparticularareamaynot bea~areof the broader concernsaJJectind the question oJ ssgmJ~cance The tull EAF ~s intended to provide a method whereby appJicant~ and aEenc~es can be assured that the determmat,on process has been orderly, comprehensive ~n nature, yet ilexlbJe to allow ~ttod~c[ion c~ infotmaho~ to iii a project or act,on Full fAF Componenl~: The ~ul] FAF is comprised ot three pails: Parl 1; Provides obiect~ve dat. ~nd Mformat~on about a g~ven ptolect and its s~te By identifying basic pro,eot data, ~t assists a ~ewe~er in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and J P~t 3: If any ~mpact in Part 2 is~dentifled aspoten a Jy-ar~e then Part 3 Is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually ~mportant DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identity the Po~'lions ot EAI: completed lot thi~ pro,ecl: ~ Part 1 ~ Pat[ 2 ~Part 3 Upon rewew of ~he mformat,~n recorded on th~s EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any o~her supportin~ information, and consider,rig both Ibc magi~ude and importance ol each impact, i~ is reasonably determined by the lead agency that A. The p[uject wdl no~ resuh m ~y large and ;mportan/ impact(s) and, therefo[e, ~ one which ~ill have a s*gmhcanl *n~pa~l on ~he enw~onment, therelore a negative de~laralion will be prepared. B, Although the project could h~ve a ~niflcant effect on the environment, lhere wdl not be a sl~nd~can[ effect fo~ th~ Un!i~led Action because the mdlgation me~su[e~ deathbed m PART 3 have been required, there[o[e a CONDITIONED nesative declaration will be p~epared.' C, The project may re~ull m one or more large ~nd impo[rant impacts thai may have a siandic4nt ~mpact on ~he enwronmen/. [herelore a po[ilive declara/io~ will be prepared. * A Condihoned Negative Decla~atlon ~s only, valid for Unbated Aclion~ ~ Village Ma~ne - Proposed Boat ~epair,/S~cra~el~j~flin~ Name of Lead A~ency Print or Type Name ol Re~¢onsible Officer in Lead Agency ~;~gnature of Responsible OtJic:~r in Lead ^aency SignatureotPre~er(lid,ffere 9/30/91 Date T~tle of Responsible Officer SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING B.O~RD ~R©JECT DESCRIPTION - VILLAGE MARINE Applicant proposes to construct a ~0'x 60' building iocat~on is requires a 46.4' variance to the Additionally, applicant proposes to pave, area landward o~ the existing bulkhead. remove ex!sting 2S'x 36' met~l bu!tding and boat repair and storage building. Proposed 28~6' landward of the existing bulkhead and regulated 7%' setback~ with asphalt, a 595 s.f. As mitigation, applicant will iastail drainage pools ~o cunta~n suormwaccr runoff. SOUIHOLD TOWN PLANNIRG BO~ R..~D PART 1--PROJF-.CT INFORMATION p~.epared by Proiect Sponsor NOTICE. Thisdocumen[~sdes~,ned toass~st mde[ermmmgwhether theact~on proposed [nay have as~gr"ficantetfect on the env,runment Please compiete the en~e term. Part~ A through E Answers to these ques~mns wilt be considered as part of ~he application fo~ approval and may be subject to further ve.hcation and pubhc review Provide any add,trane[ information you beheve ~,1t be needed to complete PArts 2 a~d 3. It i~ expected [hat completmn of the ~uH ~AF wdl be dependent on mfolmat~ofl currenHy ava*table and wdl not involve newst~dies, research°r mve~tlsation Ifm/ofmabO~requ~rmB~uchaddiU°nalw°rk~u~avaHable's°indicateandspe°fY NAME OF ACTION ~--a~r/~ora,qe But~din~ Pvooosed Mavine ,,=~ - ~- ._ ]75 Bay Avonue, Mattituc~, Suffolk Village Marine P.O. Box 1045 MattitucR, (516 ~- 298-5800 STATE . 11952 STATE [ ZIP CODE DE8CRIPTION OF ACTION ~ .... PROJECT DESCRIPTION PI, EASE SEE ATTnsH~D Pleale Complete E'-ch Queition- {ndicate N.A. il not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall proieCt, both developed an,~/undeveloped 1 Present land use ~Urban I~lndustrial ~Commercial F-)Forest ~A~ricu[tu~e ~Other .54 acres 2. Iota( acreaE~ of p;ol~ct af~ PR[S[NTLY APPROXIMAI[ ACR[AG~ 0 _ acres Meadow or ~ru~hland (Non-a~t~cuJturaJ) Forested - 0 acres A~r~cultural (Includes orchard~, cropland, pasture, etc.] ,.- Wedand (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 2~ of ECL) 0 acres Water Surface Area O ~ acres ~nw~eta~ed ~oc~, earth or fill] ~ acre~ , 1.1 _~ acr~ OResidential (suburban) Roads, buddings and o~her paved surfaces Other [Indicate type}Gr~v~1 [~oat Storaqe/Parkinq,,Area ,40 acres . 35 Riverhead Sand~ Loam 3. What ,S predominant so~I/type(S) on project s,[e? Rd - a Soil drainage ~Well drained ]00 % of ~te ~Mode~atelyweildrai~ed % of site ~Rura) (non-farm] [~PoorJy drained -- % of s,te b If any agricultural land ~s involved, how many acres et soil are classlhed w~th~r~ Land CJassdicauon System;~ -- acres (See I NYCRR 370) 4, Are there bedrock outctoppm8s on project site? ~Yes ~o a. What is depth to bedrock~ _ 600+ ' [in feet) 2 AFTER(~OMPLETION acres O acres 0 acres 0 acres ~5% or ~reater % Re~,sters et H~stooc Places/~,e.v ~ ~o ~Ye~ ~NO Accerd,ng to Field Inspection Identity each ~pec~e~ 12. Are there any umqu~ or unusd~J land ~, - ,~,m, on prelect ~Yes o Descr~b~ a) Jr Ye~, does sufficient . - ,..uw connectionf ~Yes 16 Is the ~;te located m Section 303 and 304? lg, Is the site located m o~ of t~e ECL and 6 NYCRR bI77 ~Yes ~No (Tributary to Peconic Bay) 20 Has the site ever been u~ed [o[ the disposal of sohd o~ hazardous wastes? ~Yes ~No B. Project Deacrlption 1. Phys,cal dimensions and scale a[ pro;eot (ii!! u, dimens,ons as appropna[e) a Total conbauous acreage owned o~ c~n[toll~d b~iprqject sponsor .0fi (ex~ns~ on) b Project acreage (o be developed ac~es c. Proiect acreage to rem.,,n u,~de;e)2ped 0 acres d, Length of project, in miles. {It appropriate) e H the proWct *s an e~pansion, indicate p~rcen~ o~ expansion p~oposed ~ g ~lrnurf~ vehicular tr~ps fletletaled aer hour ~ h I$ residential N,~mber and (ype et hou~m~ Ufil[S One famdy [we Famdy ImtiaJly UIDmaI~IV i Dimensions (in feet) of ]ar~est proposed st&~clure ~_ height; 60' width, I Linear feet et fro~ta~ aJon8 a public thoroLJ~hj~fe plol¢cI will occupy is? *less than 35' 3 .54 .05 it ; proposed (upon completion of pro;,'Cl A~uJDpln J~ a ri'lily ~. ~O[~J ~n!b~r of phases a,~n~.~ted {number] c Approxnw~ate completion date of final pha>e d I~ pha~e i lunchonaliy dependent an subsequent phases? B Wi:I bJ~ting occur during construCnOn~ ~Yu~ 5 ~' 0 ' - ', ~,.~ .~h~ch ~?tfiucr~ 5-~dl ho discharged 1]. Is suOsu~r.:ce hqu~a ~.~c d spc.~0, m,,o~ved? C".= No T}pe _. 14 Will surface area el an ~,,snna water body increase or decrease by p~oposal? [xpiain 16. W,II the p,oieci generate sohd wastu? ' Yes : o a {[ yes, what is the amount per modth ~ tons b I{ yes. wdl an ex~stmg sohd waste {aclli~y be used? c If yes. g,ve name ~uthold T"~ ua~d[il! .... ; Iocauon d. Will any wastes noi go into a sewage disposal system or ,mo a sanitary landfill/ ~Yes ~No L2No Southold, N.Y. ~Yes ~No e. Ii Yes, explain 17 wdl the prelect m~o,~, the d~sposai et sohd ¢,a~te? ~Yes o a. }[ ~es, what ~s the anticipated rate of d*sposa[? tons/month b It yes, what i~ the anhopated si~e {,fat _~,afs ltl Wdl prowct use herbicides or p~st<ides? ~Yes o 19 W,{I project routmeiV produce odors (more than one hour pe[ davh~ ~¥,'s o . soumou~ -- PtANNIN~ BOARD I0 W,ll prelect produce operahng no,se exceeding the {o~al ambient noise ]evels~ N ,lo(, ric~t.l, ?oatine'oll 22 !f water supply is hem weals, mdtcate pumpm.4 ¢o. pa,';ity 24 Does project mvol..e Local. S~ate or Fod~ra{ funding? ~Ye5 If ~es, __ gailonx,'mmu~e **(existtnn faoiltty - no increase needed) · ~S. Approv;,15 Requht~d: City, Town, Vdlat~e Board CmA Tossn, Vdlage Planmng ~oard ~-%e~. g..No City, Town Zoning Board ~e~ ~No City, County Heahh Department Other Local Agencies ~Ye~ ~N~ Other Reg~unal Ag~nc~e~ State Agenc*e~ Federal Agenc,e~ ~e~ C. Zoning and Planning Information If Yes, red,cate decision requ~red Fype 2 Plan Approval -SanJ. Lat y Syst.em 'Jz¢.ra N.Y.S.D.E.C. Act, 25 .-, dec~s~om' Xyes C]No 4 What ~ the pmpc, sed zomn.g oi [,he ~,ilel' :~-~ Narina 6 Is the propGs,~d action conMsJenl wgh ~.r~e :~commended uses in adopted Iocai land u~e 7 What ate the pr~.~mman~ ~ ~ist. ing co~rc~a! deVcQo~r~n~ ~orth, east & 'west, residant~al 9. If the proposed act~oa ~ the subdwision of land, how many lots are proposed? n/a a Wh~t is [he minimum lot s~ze p~oposed? 10. Wdl proposed act!oa reqmre any au[hor~zation(M for the formation of sewer or water dismcts? Will ~he proposed aclmn creat~a demand ~or any fi,e protectloq)? ~'fes ~No commtmitV ptoMded setvicus {tecre< 0% edu~atior poi,ce, a. I[ yes, ~ existm~ caRac:pz stdficient ' · ' ~ ~u h.r~ale projected dcrnandt f~tes 12 Wdj the proposed action resuh m !he gener.mon ot Waffic sigmficantJy above present a Il %es, ~ the exlshng road nels~ork adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes [-]No D. Informational avoid them ~l~ App~cant/Sp~l Name Ianya L,achen~ey~r/~r~ U=~ Co.any fOr Villa ~,Marine r ~ -~- ---' ' "' '- g D~,~ -J30/')l l[.l~e a~hon Is m the Coaslal A~ea, and ~ou ate a state'gent), complete the Coaslal Asleslment Form beiore Proceedinl 5 · In completing [he form the rewewer should be ~,u~ded by the question: ttave my · ~ ,:md deSOLISflBi;l~12~lbeen I re~on~blet The ~evi~wer is not e~pected to be ~n expert enviror~mental analyst. L PL~NIN~ BOARD I · Ident[i¥ing thzt ~n ,mp~c[ w;H be poterm,div ~ar~e (column 2J doe~ not mean that ~ ,s al~o necessarily Any large .~pac~ must b~ e'.,Mu~ted ~n PART 3 ~G de[ermm~ significance. IdentiiyM~ an .~p~c( m column 2 asks that it be took~d ~[ further · The Example~ pm,.~ded ~re to ass~s~ [he ,evle.~cr by showing types of m~pacts and wherever ~oss~ble tho :hFeshoid of mJgmtude(hatwouldtng~era responseinro)umn2 The example! are generdlly apphc;blethroughout~heS~ateand for most s,~uahon~ But, ~or arW ~pec~f~c p~oiect or site other examples and/or lower ~hre~olds ,P.~V b~ ~pprop~a/e fo~ a Potential Large Impact response, ~hu~ requmn~ evaluatmn m Part ] · The .npac[s et each project, On ~.ach ~e, m e~ch Icc~iiW. will v;w. ~herefcre, the ~x~mp~ a~e ,llu~Ua~ve and have been oHered a~ gu~d,mce They do not con~titu[e an ePhau~dve I=s[ of impacts and [hfu~ho]ds [o answer each question · ~he number of example~ pe~ question doe~ not indicate the importance of each queshon · In ,dentlfymg impact~, cons~de~ long term, short term and cumlatlve I.~llu~lion~ {Re~d carefully) b Maybe answers ~hou~d be considered as 7es answers. c, ~f answerm~ YeS to a question then ch~c~ tt',~ appropriate bo~.(co~mfl 1 or 2)[o md~ca~v the potenual size of the ~mpact. lfim~actthresholdequa!sore~ceed~anyexompleprovlded, check column 2 lf impact will occur but ~hre~hold Js lower than e~amp~e, check column 1 d If reviewer has doub~ abou~ s~ze el the impact then con~ider the m'~pact a~ potenbally large and proceed ~o PART e. If a po(enhaJ!y lar3e unpact ch~ck~d m column ~ c~n b~ n.~i~ated by chang~) in the prOJ~Ct to a small to ~mpacL al~o check ~he ~es aox in column J A NO response md,c.~es lh~t ~uch a ~educlion ~s no~ possible. This mus~ be e~plained in Part 3 IMPACT ON LAND Will :.he propo~ed act~cn result m a ph'¢s~cal char,~.e ia l?.~prolect ,I~,N 0 [xamples that would ~pply to column 2 Any construction on slopes et 1~% or greater, (1~ fern rise pe~ 1~ foot of length), or where ~he ~eneral slopes in ~he project area exceed 10%. Construcbon on land where the d~pth to the water ~ab~e is less than 3 t~et Con~trucbon of paved parkm~ area tot ~,~ or more vehicles. Consttuctinn on ~and where bedrock i~ expo~d or ~enetatly within 3 feet of e~istm~ ground Construcbon that will continue for mo~e than 1 year or revolve more than one phase or sta~e Excavation faf nunm~ p~po~es lha~ would ~emove mo~e than tons of natural mate~al 0 e,, roc~ or soil} per year Construchon or expansion of a ~4nttary landfill Will there be an effect to any unique or ,.musual land ~,~,ms found on the site? (i.e, cliffs, dunes, geological formations, e[~NO ~Y£$ · Specific land forms. 6 I 2 3 Sm~ll to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Largo Mi.tigaled Ry Impact Impact Project Change E) [] rqyes L~No [] ~ C]¥es ~No ~ ~ ~es ~No Q Wes IMPACT ON WATER Will proposed dctiOfl .~ftect any w~te~ body de;~Anated as p¢o~ec[ed~ (Unde~ Art;c[e~ 15, 24, 25 o~ ~he ~vlro~h~n[al C~q;ser~n Law, ~CL~ [xample~ that wo~ld ~ppiy io cMumn 2 ! Wdl proposed action ~dect any non-prote£ted e,,istmg or new body of water? ~0 []YLS £1tample~, that would ~pply to column Z Other ~mpacts: Will Proposed Act[on 8ifeti su;t,~ce et g;oundw-ater quahly Ol quantm,,? [*imp[~i that would appi'/ have approva! to serve propo~d (pro~ect] Proposed Acdon requue~ w~[~-r supply from ~ells ~*th greater than 45 gallons per minule pumping ~upply system P~oposed Actmn Uquid effluent wdl be conveyed of[ the ~ite to tacdRies which presently Proposed Achon would u~e water m exce5~ oJ 20J~ aallon~ per day Proposed Action wilt [equl~e the ~torage ot petrowum or chemtcal products g~eater ~han 1,103 ftcdJtie* Wdl proposed action aher drainage flow or patte~, or water runoH? ~hO [~amp{e~ [ha, womd ap;~tV to column 2 Proposed Acuon would chan~e Hood water flows surface 1 Small to Modorale 2 Largo ,, [Z LJ [! a Can impact Be Mitif~&ted Project Change t , ~,~s ~Yes L.JNo L~ ;'es L~ No ILJ ','es ; ' [xarnple~ rl,~ would appl~ ~o coiumn 2 hour ()~her ~mp~c~s 1..'~PACT ON ~'Li~.~T8 ANO A~iMALS Will Propc~cd ~ch~n , Removal of any 2oruon non.endangered speci~s1 ~NO ~YES E~mpl~* [hat woLdd epply to column 2 Proposed Acuon wotJd subsLand~lly in~ertere wRh arW resident or m~g*atory /l~h, she!lhsh or wddhfo :MPACf ON AGRIOULTU~AL ~ND Small tO Moderate Impact 2 P0lentlBI Large ImpAct 3 Can impact Be Mitigated By ¢~rojem Change --_-Ye; r~y~s I'-lNo ~L~, Y es r~No ~¥es ~No of agricultural land or, d located m an Adricuh~;~d [3~strmt, fno;e than 2 5 acres oi ~gr~cuku~al brad Other impacts 11 Wall proposed act,on a~[e~ [ aesthetic r,,~o~ce~? ~O (If necessary, use th~ v,:,~,d E,~,~ Add~r,d;m~ ml'~cC~on 617 Appendi~ ~ j IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ASCHAEOLOOJGAL NESOUBCES 12. Wdl Proposed Acboa impact any s*te or structure ?~h~stonc, pre- h~storic or paleontoiogica~ importance? ~NO E~amples ti~at w~uld apply to column 2 · Proposed Action o~cumng whoi]y or paH~ll¢ within or substantially cofltlguOu~ to any facih~y Or s~t~ I,~ed on the ~[a~e or NaU~nal of h,stout places project IMPACT ON OPEN ,SPACE AND 13 Wdl Propos.-d A~.bon ~iiect th~ qu~nuty [xample~ :hat w~uJd apply ~o Column 2 Other ,mpacts g 1 Small to Moderale Large Mitigated impact Pm~sCt Change ~,~ ~ es ~JNO ~JYes iMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD B Will proposed act[on atiect the char-',ctet of the exis[in~ commun:t¥? ,~0 [3Y~S [x~mpJeJ that would ~ppJy (o column 2 The permanent popuJaJto~ OJ ~he c,ty, rowe ot wHage Jn w'h~ch the The municipal budget for c~p~{~} ~xpe~d~tute~ o~ operating serVlCe~ wdl mcrea~e hy more than 5% pet yea~ as a result o[ this proiect .Proposed acbon wiJJ conflict with off~(~aHy adopted plans or goals. Proposed action will czu~ ~ change m the deathly nj J~nd u~e Proposed .Action wdl replace of ehmma[e ex~tJng facihties, s~¢uctures o~ aCeas of historic ~mport~nce ~o the commumty Development wdl create a demand Jot addibonal community serwces (e.~. schools, police and fire, etc) P~oposed Action will set an ~mpo~.n~ pr¢ceden~ for future prolec~s Olhet impacts 1 2 3 Small to PotenttaJ Can Iml~ac! Be Moderate Lurge Mltignted By Impact impact Proiect Change L] ~ ~w~ ~o ~ ~ ~Yes  ~ ~ves ~No 1 !9 Is ihere, or ~s there hkeJ¥ to be, pubhc controv.~rs~, related to po~ntidi ~dver~ en',ironm~ntal ~mpacts? ~lO ~YES i! You Cannot Dot~rmtno ih,~ ~4eg,~Itu~o of Impact, Procoed to Part 3 Part 3-,-E. VALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCD. OF ~MPACTS i Re~ponsibilily nj Lead Ajjency Part 3 must be prepared it one or more impact{s) is conddered to be pofenlially large, even il Ihe impact(~) may be mitigated. / Initructlonl. Discuss the followinI for each impact ide~,hfied in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 Briefly describe the 2 Describe (~f applicable) how Ihe m~pact cou',d be mJhgated or reduced to a ~mali :o modera:¢ impact by proiect chan&~s) 3 Based on the iniormahon available, decld~ d ~t ~ reasonable to conclude that th,~ impact ~s important. To answer the question of importarice. ~:on~tder. · The probablhtv of the impact ~)ccurrmg · The dur,~bon of lhe m',pacl · Its IrreversiblJlt¥'. including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the m~pact can or will be controlled · The f~lofl~lJ consequence of t~e impact · its potential divergence from J~cal needs and woals 11 lO ~J SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM~: COMMENTS: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER ENVIRONMENT~G CONSULTANTS $o;JTIIOLI~ TOWN Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 November 4, 1991 Re: Review of Long EAF Village Marine, SR 25, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-3-15.1 Dear Benny: As per the your request we have completed a prelimin, ary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as fi)llows: Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below· o Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The project site is currently developed and the proposed project calls for removal of an existing 940 square foot building, to be replaced'with a 2,400 square foot building, with assoclated site improvements."Site impr'ovements include resurfacing parking and storage areas, installation of slormwater collection and leaching facilities, provision of a 10 foot landscaped buffeh and additional landscaping. The fact that the site is currently utilized as a marina, decreases t e s~gnlficance of impacts of site plan amendment. Beneficial impacts are recoghzed due to the control of site runoff. Inspection of the existing facility finds that silt and runoff accumulation is occurring south of the existing 940 square foot shed, in an area where engine repair and boat washing is conducted. In addition, it is noted that boats are stored and displayed in areas set aside for future parking. The proposed site improvements, are anticipated to generally provide net environmental benefit for the reasons notedabove. The following recommendations should also be considered by the Planning Board in deliberations on this project: 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516~ 331-1455 Panel Village Marine, Mattltuck Long EAF Review Runoff must be directed away from the surface water and toward sediment catch basins. The site plan seems to indicate that a planter will be used adjacent the bulkhead, to create a barrier to runoff. The elevation and intent of the barrier should be more clearly depicted on the plan in order to assist in assuring compliance during future inspections. Sediment catch basins must be maintained to .be .effective. The applicant should establish a maintenance schedule and ~ndlcate a proposed contractor who will be on call to conduct such maintenance. * Due to the need for a variance from required parking, the parking stalls which are proposed must be clearly marked and must remain accessible. The NYSDEC has a policy of requiring a pump out facility for marina installation and modification projects. The NYSDEC is an involved agency and will issue permits based upon their review. If a pump out facility is not proposed, the applicant should provide justification in terms of demand and facility use in oroer to assist the Town in determining the appropriateness of this potentially beneficial consideration. The 10 foot landscaped buffer may receive some runoff. Due to existing and proposed grades of the parking area and catch basin, runoff should not be permitted to leave the site. Groundcover should be specified for this area, and a means of ensuring that runoff will not leave the site should be provided. The proposed project is in a Critical Environmental Area, in recognition area sensitivity. As indicated, with proper consideration, the proposed amendments could provide a net environmental benefit. We feel that a Negative Declaration could be appropriate for the subject application, in accordance w~th the Criteria for Determining Significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, provided specific measures noted above are incorporated into the proposed project. I hope this letter provides the board with the inform.ation needed to complete review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional ~nput upon request, l~lease do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. enc: Part I/II LEAF E NVI RO N M E NT~'~D~/,~G CONSULTANTS Very t~l~jour s, Charles J. Voorhis, c£P, AICP Page 2 ,14? b-2'(2/'OFJ -- 7c 617.21 Appendix A SEQR State Envlronmelllal Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full /AF ~ designed lo help apphcant~ and agencie~ determ.ne, m an orderly manner, whether a prelect or achon may be s~gn,iJcant ~he que~tjo~ o[ whether an achon may be ~igmficant ;s not always ea~v to an~wer Frequent. ly, there ate aspects of a project tha~ ~re subjective or unmeasuteabje Il is also uncle/stood that l`hose who de[ermine ~ignificance may have liltle or no to~maJ k~4owled~e of the environment Or may be technicaiJ~ expert i~ environmenLa~ analysis In add tmon, m~ny who have knowledge m one Parhcular area may not be awareof the broader concerns a~fectin~ the question of The full EAF Js intended to provide a method whereby applicants and ggencies can be assured/hat Fha determmahon process ha~ been otdeH¥, comprehensive m nature, yel ilex~bJe to allow introduction ct informahon to fit a project or acuon Full ~AF Common.rill: lhe tull ~AF is comprised el three patio: Parl 1; Provides objectwe da/~ and informahon abou[ a given project and it~ s*te By ~den~ying basic project data, ~t assists a rewewer m the analysis thai take~ place in Parts 2 and J Pail 2= Iocuses on ~den~fwnA the ~aflge el P~s~ble impact5 [hat may occur from a project o~achon It prowde~ ~u~dancu as [o wh['ther an impact is likely ~o be coat.dared ~mall to moderale or whe[hei Jt i~ a potentially- large *mp~[ Fha term al~o ~dunbjles wl~ether an impac~ can be mitigated o~ reduced. Pail ]: If a~ly ~mpact in ~a~ 2 IS .dentified as potentially.large, then Part ~ *s used to evaluate whether or not inipac~ is actually ~mporlan/ D[TERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Ider~tily /he Poflions of EAF completed for ibis project: /~ Part 1 [~ Part 2 ~Part 3 Upon review of the miormahon recorded o~ th~ ~AF (Part~ ~ and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any mher supporting information, and considering both the ma~[ud~ and importance el each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead a~ncy [hat A. The p[olect wd! not result m dny large and 'mportant impact[s) and, therefore, ~s one which will nol have a 5~gnihcan( m~pdC~ On the environment, therefore a negative de(la,alton will be pre~a~ed, B, Although the Pro/ecl could hdve a s~&nificant effect on the envitonmeflt, there will not be a s~gnil~canz effect for th~ Onlisled Action becduse the mmgation measures described ,n PART 3 have been requ red, therefore a CONDITIONED he,alive declaralio, will be p~epa~ed.' C. The project may result m one or more la,ge and important impdcts that may ha~e a signilicdnt m~pact on !he environment, therefore a pOiiiive declaration will be prepared, * A Condihoned Negative Oecla~ation ~S only valid for IJnhsled Achon~ Print or Type Name et Responsible Officer in Lead Agency T.tle of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Pre(l~r (Ii d~fferer 9/30/9! Date 1 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNIN~,B, OAR~D PROJECT DESCRIPTION - VILLAGE MARINE Applicant proposes to remove existing 2~'x 36' metal building and construct a 40'x 60' boat repair and storage building. Proposed building iocatlon is 28.6' landward of the existing bulkhead and requires a 46.4' variance to the regulated 75' setback. Additionally, applicant proposes to pave, with asphalt, a 595 area landward of the existing bulkhead. As mitigation, applicant will install drainage pools to contain stormwater runoff. SOUTHOLO TOWN 1 PLANNING BOARD .a~.. '' PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document ~s desk,ned to assist in determining, whether the action proposed may have a s~nificant effect on theenwronment Please compiete the ennre form. partsA through E Answers to these queshonswill be considered at part of the apphca[ion fo~ approval and may be sub,ecl to further v~,hcation and pubhc revmw Provide any addmonal reformation you behave w,II be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 It i~ expected that completion of ~he full fAF will be dependent on info~m~tiofl currenHy available and w~[I not involve ~ew studies, research or ~nve~t~at~on It mtotmabon ~equ~rin~ ~uch additional work ~s unavailable, so indicate and specify ~NAMI OF ACTION Pr~o£ed Marine Repair/Storage Btl~lding 175 Ba~; A¥onue, Hattit%~c}~, Suffolk ¥i ~1_1 age Marine ADDRESS P.O. Box 1045 MattituCk~ CiI'Y~PO OF ACTION PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PROJECT DESCRIPTION ~-~ BU~INE~,~ TELEPHONE (516 ~- 298:5800 N.Y. ] i1952 F:~S TELEPHONE ~ ~TATE ~ ZIP CODE Pleale Complete Each QuarrieD-Indicale N.A, if Dot applicable A. Site Description Physical settinli ~f overatl project, both developed an,~u~developed 1 Present land use ~Urban [::]Industrial /[~Commercial E3Forest ~]Aliriculture [~Other · 54 acres 2 Iotal acreage of p~oiect area APpROXiMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-alu(cultural1 Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.} Wetland [Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill] ~Residentiai Csuburban) [~Rurat [non.farm] PRESENTLY 0 ~ acres 0 acres 0 acres AFTERoCOMPLETION acres O acres 0 acres 0 acres Roads, bmldin~,s and other paved surfaces ...~~ acres Other [Indicate typeL~ravel Boat Storaqe/Parki~q Area .40 acres Rlverhead Sandy Loam 3. What i~ predom,nan[ ~o~1/type(s) on project s,te? Rd ~ a Soil drainage ~Well drained 100 % of site ~Modefatety well drained ~Foor[y d[ained % of site b If any a&ricultural land ~s involved, how many acres et soil ate classlf~ed w~thm Land C[as~ficanon System? acres (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are thu~e bedrock outCtopp~n&s on project site[ ~Yes ~o a. What is depth to bed~ock~ 600+ ' (in feet) 2 · 35 acres % of site NOV - 6 1991 ~HOLOT0WN i tqANNINO BOARD '5 Approximate percentage of proposed prolect >~tu with slopes; ~-10% ] GO % [~10-1 S% _ % Fq15% or ~reater 6. IS prolec~ substanl;atly comlguous to. or.~nlam a buildiflg. ~mt~. or dislricL listed on the Stale or the National Registers of H~torlc Placesf ~Yes ~No 7. Is project s~bgtantiailv contiguous to a s~te I~ted on the Register of Nat~onat Natural Landmark~f ~Yes ~No 8 What ~s the depth of the water table~ bn ieetj 9. Is 5~{e located over a primary, ptmopal, or 5ole source aquiferf ~Ye5 ~No 10 DO hunting, {~hin~ or shell fishing opportumt:e~ presently exist m the project are~? ~Yes r ~No 11 Does pro}ect stte conta,n any species of plant or animal Irfe that ~s ~dentdled as threatened Or endangered? Accord,rig to Field Inspection ' [der}tdy each ~pec:e~ 12. Are there any umque or unusual land lotms on the project s~te? {lc. cliffs, don~$, ~ther geological fotmahonsj Describe 13 Is the project sd~.,oresently used by the community or nmghborhood as an open space or recto,bun areal l]Ye, ~TNo I[ yes. e×plain 14 Does the present:,~.cte ~ncJude scenic WPWS ~Ow~ tO be important to the commumty? ~o 15 Streams w~thm or co,t~ous ~o proiect area 3ames Creek a Narne Gl Slream and name of R~ver to which it i{ tributary Great Peconic Bay 16. Lakes, poeds, wetlal~d are,~s w~thin or cont,guous to project area: a Name b. Size (in acre~) 17 Is the s~te served by ex,sting public otilit~esf ~1~f'es ~No a) it Yes. does sufficient capacit~ e~l~t to allow con~ection~ ~Yes ~No b) If Yes. will *mpro~ement¢ be necessary to allow connection? ~Yes ~No (~ansion of ~xis%ing use) 1~ Is the 5itc located m an agr~c¢ttur~l/distuct certified pursuant to'Agcicultu~e and Markets Law, Arucle Sectton 303 and 304f ~Yes ~o 19. h the site located m or substanhall~ont,auous to a Cutical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL, and6 NYCRR blT? ~Yes QNo (Tributary t,o Peconic ~y) 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste$t QYes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of pro;eot [fill in dimensions as appropriate). 54 a Total contmguous acreage owned ut controlled b'~ Drqject sponsor .05 (ex"pansl on ) b Project acreage to be developed: acres imtially; ,05 g, h Project acreage to remain undeveJoped 0 acres. n/a Length of prolect, in miles: (It appropriate) Ii the pro~ect r~ an e~.pansion, indicate percent of expans~0n proposed __ n/a _~ Number ut oif-:itreet porkmg spaces existin~i 5 Maximum vehicular tr~ps generated per hour 8 If residenhal: Number and type of housin,~ umt~ n/a One Famdy Two Family ,Multiple Famdy Imtially Ulhmately Dimensiont (in feet) of largest proposed 5tructute__* height; 60 ' width, 40 ' ~ lenlith. Linear feet ut frontage along a public thoroughiare prolect will occupy isf 50 tt *less than 35' ; proposed 1 0 (upon completion of pro;er 3. Wdt d~sturhed area~ be reclaimed? ~Yes ~No ~N/A ~ ii ~e~. fa~ wh~ m en~=d pu[po~u ~s [he ~[e being [eclaimed! b W~] ~ t be stockpded [o~ reclamahon? ~Ye~ ~No 4 How many ~cre~ of ~g~tat~on~tr~cs. :.hrub~ ~rour, d c.:,'.,ers) w,Ii b~ [emov~d from ~,te) acte~ ? Ii moiu phased c ^ppm×u'nat~ cornple~ion daD~ oi ~i~l ~hase d I~ pha~e i ~nchonaliy dep~ndem on subsequent phases? 5~ 0 10 Number oI ~b~ ~HrnJnated by ~MS project (number] tons/cubic yards mom. h __~ year. tmctudmg demolition) month .. year. ~¥es ~No 2 after prolect JS complelc ~ e~, o If yes, explain ~ ~ ~Yes ,~N 14 Wilt sudace area ot an e~*s[mg water body ,no,ease or decrease by proposaR Expiam 15 is project ot an~ pomon o[ p~ojecl lecated m a IC~ yea~ flood plain? a If yes, what is the amount per mo~th tons b I[ yes, will an exisnng solid waste {gc~l{ty be used? ~Yes c if yes, 8,ye name ~uthold T~ Lan~¢~l ~; Iocauon d. Will ,my wa~te~ not ~o rote ~ ~ewa~e disposM system e. It Yes, e~plam 17 wdl the project in~'ok, e the d,sposal o! sohd waste? ~Ye~ a. Ii yes, what ~s d~e anticipated r~te ~f dt~posall ,,. 18 ¥¥ilJ project use herbicides or pe~(icid~sI ~Yes *e×istinq sanitary system to ~ u~ ~ ~o'~0~---- ~No [~No tons/month 19 Wdl pro)~'c~ routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~Yes o project mvoNe Local Sta~e ot FederM fund*ns? ~Yes o Southo ld, N,Y. C]Yes E]No II JUl NOV- L _' ~OUTtlOI~ TOWN-'-~ gallcms,~m,nute. *'(existinq facility - no increase needed) · *;~$. Approval~ Required: City, Town, Vdlage Board C~ty, Town, V41at~e Planning Board ~e~ ~No CRy, Town Zonln~ Board e~ ~No City. County Health Department ~e~ ~No Other Local Agencies ~Ye~ State Agencies ~e~ ~No Federal Agenc,es ~Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed ac[ion mvoJve a planning or zoning decislont i[ Yes. indicate decision required Type Site Plat] Approval t SOLITH(;LD ] O/SS Sanitary System Upgrade Pen d ing 0/88 N.Y.S,D.E.C. Art. 25 ~ZOmng amendment ,~l~onin~l variance []special use perm,t [asubdiws,on ~0/site plan ~new/revi~o~ of m~ster plan ~}esource management plan ~other What ~s the ZODlflg cla~sihcat~on(s)sf the sire? H-1 What i~ th~ maxm~um po~emlaJ deveJOpmenJ of the st~e ff developed as permffted b~ the pre~ent zonmg~ ~rina What is the proposed zomng of What is the rna~m~um potential devetopmen~ of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed Zomng~ i"'~[ ina 6. Is the proposed action consistent wll[h the recommended uses ii', adopted Iocai land use plans? /~Ye$ ~No 7 What are the predominant !and us~) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius ot proposed ~isting co~rcial develo~nt north, eas~ & we~t; residential dleveig~nt south 8. Is the proposed action compatible w~th adloimn~urroundin~ land uses within a ~4 mHet es ~No 9. ff the proposed acllon ~ Jhe subdivision o~ land, how many lots are proposed1 n/a a What is the mm)mum lot sJze p~oposed? 10 WHI proposed action reqmre any au~horiza/ion(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ~Yes ~No 11 Will the p[opo~ed action crea~a demand ~or any community pro~ided services [recreation, education police, fi,e prolectio~)t ~Ye~ ~No ' a. If ye% is existm~ capac~ly sufficient ~o handle projected demand~ ~Ye~ ~No 12 Wdl the proposed act,on result in the generation ot traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes a. If ~es, ~s the ex~stmg road oelwork adequate to ~andle the additional traffic~ ~Yes ~No O. Intormallonai Detalia Attach any addmonal inlormatson as may be needed ~o clarify your project If ~here are or may be any adverse impacts assoc~atvd with ~our p[opo~a], please discuss ~uch ~mpacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate E. Verification ~u~ ~ ~w~ ~ ~Y&,~. I certify tha~ the mlorm~uon p~ovlded above ~ ~ue ~o ~he best of my knowied~ . Applican~/~t Name ~any~ La.he--year. nd Use ~o~ny ~o[ V~l~aqe"a~r'e 9/30/9] Si~n ~'~ T~tle Project ~na~er Il the aclion is in the C~aHal Area, and you ate a ~lale'agen¢), complete the Coailal Aileismonl Form beiore proCeedin~ with this asse~mem. " '. Part 2--PROJ h-~I:~ACTS AND THEIR · In compleun8 the ~orm the r~view~f should be guided by the question: Have my re~pons~ ~nd de~6~l been ~ PLANNING ~ J rea$onable~ The reviewer ~s not expected to be an expert environm~-.n[al analyst a Identifying that an ~mpact will be potentiativ large (column 2] does not mean that ~ ,s ah, o necessarily Any large ~mpact mu~t be e,,aJu~ted ~n PART 3 [o deJermine sig~iiicance, IdentiJyin~ an m*~,act ~n column 2 simply asks that i~ be looked a[ fudhe~ * The [~ample~ prc~wded are ~o assist the ~ev~e,~.r by ~howmg types of m~pacts and wherever Goss~ble the threshold of maimtudethat wouidtr~e~a response in column 2 The examples are ~ener~ily apphcabl~ throughout the gta[e and for most s,tu~t,on~ gut, io~ a.y s~ec~hc p¢olect or site other examples and~ot [ower thresholds m~t b~ ~pp¢op¢iate fo~ a Potential Large In]pact response, thus reqmrm~ evaluation m Pa[t 3 . The unpacts of each [)rGject, on each S~te. m each locality, will Vary, Therefore, the ex~mpJes are liJu~[[atlve and have been oHered as guidance They do not constitute an exhaustive hst of Impact~ and thresholds :o answer each question e The number of example~ per question doe~ not indicate the importance of each quest,on ~ In ~dentifymg ~mpact~, cofls~de~ long term, shorl term and cumlabve e[fect~ Inlt~u~li0ni {Read carefully) a. Answer each of ~he 19 (lUeSl~Ons m PART 2 Ar, swe~ ;'e~ if there wdJ be aoy impact b Maybe answers ~hou~d be considered as ~el an~wer~. c. If answerm~ Yes Io a quest,on then ch~ck ~he appropriate box(co!utah I or 2) to indicate, the potential size of impact Ifimpactth~eshoJdequa!sorezceed~anyexampjeprov~ded, checkco!umn2 Ifimpac[wiNoccurbut~hre~hold is lower tha~ e~AmpJe, check column 1 d I~ rewewer has doub~ abou~ ~*ze of ~he impact then consider the m'~pact a~ potenbaily la~e and proceed to PART 3 e. If a po~ennalJy large m~pact rh~cked m column 2 can b~ mitigated by chang~) in the p~olec~ to a small ~o moderate ~mpact, a~o check the ~es box m column J A NO response indic,res that ~uch a ~eduction ~s no~ possible. This must be e~pJamed m Part ~ IMPACT ON LAND Will t-he propo~ed acbon result in a physical chanlte to ~h.~ prelect sitar ,1~o []YES [~amples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 1~% or greater, (15 foot rise pe~ 1~ foot Of lenith), or where the ~eneral slopes ~n ~he projec~ area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to ~he water table is less than Const~ucbo~ of paved parkm~ area ~or I,~ or more vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock ~ exposed or generally witl~in 3 feet of existing ground surtace, Cons:rucbon that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes thai would r,~move mo~e than 1,~ tons et natural ma[eual 0 e., rock or sod) per year Construction or ~xpansion of a sanitary landfill Construction m a designated floodway Other ~mpac~s 2 Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land,~fo~,.ms found on the site? (i.e, cliffs, dunes, geoloRical iormat~ons, etc),~NO ~Y£S · Specific land forms Small to Potential Can Impact Eta Moderate Large Mitigated 8y Impact Impact Project Change [] ~ ~Yes [~No [] [] C]Yes ~No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON WATER Will proposed action ,Htect any w,~ter body designated as protected~ (Unde~ Articles 15. 24. 25 of lhe EnvironmentaJ Co,ser~n Law, ECL) ~0 ~amptes ~hat would apply io column 2 Developable a~a ot site centares a protected wa~er body Dredging more than 1~) cubic ~ds of ~ater~al from channel of a protected stream Extensmon of uldi~y d~stnbut~on tacditi,.s through a protecied water body Construction m ~ designated t~eshwater or i~d~l wedand Other Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing,_.,or new body of wated '~0 []Y£S £~amples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease m the surface area of any body of water Construction of a body ~1 wa[e~ that e~ceuds iO ~c;es o~ surface area Other impacl;: WAll Proposed Achon ~ffect surface o; grouodw,~ter quaiity or quantm,4 ,~O ~Y£S J~amples that 'would ~pply [O column 2 Proposed Action will require a d~scha~ge permit Proposed Action requires u~e of a ~o~ce ot wa~er that does not have apptov~J to serve propo,ud (project) act,on Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capa~m/ supply system, Proposed Action wdi adver~e!y a~ect groundwater Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities whmh presently do not ex*st or have inadequate capacity Proposed A~[ion would u~e wa[er m excess of 20,~ gallons per day. Proposed Action wdl hkeJy cause siltation or other d~char~e *~to an ex~stm~ body et water to the extent ~hat there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural cond;tions Proposed Action will require tho ~torase of petroleum or chemical products greater th~n 1,1~ gallons Proposed Action wilt a[Jow ~esidentiaJ u~e~ in areas w,thout waier facilitie~ Other impdc:~ Wd! proposed action alter drainage flow or part te~ or water runofU E,~amp]es thal would apply to coJumn 2 Proposed Acuon would chan~e flood water flows surface I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact @e Moderate Largo Mitigated ~y I Impact Impact Project Change ~ ~ ~Ves ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~ws ~ ~ ~Yes ;M~ACT ON AiR 7 Will p~opos~.d ¢c:~on s~:ect att c;uah~yf ~NO hour to industrial I~PACT ON PLANTS ANO Will Propc~d Ac',.sn ,~Hec: an', thleat~m.d ReducbOn of one or no¢e species hsted on *he New Vo~k or Federal Removal of en'r poruon o( i crmcaJ or s~mhcant wddhfe habitat. Appl~cahon of []es[:c~de of h~.rb,c~de more th.~r; lwic~ a year, other than fei ~gf~(ultutaJ purposes Oiher ~mpact): Wdl Proposed ACt!an subs~an'.~all¥ non-endangered species?~O Proposed .~ct~on wo.~d substantially interfere with ar~y resident m~glatory h~h, shel!J,~h or wddhfe spl;c:es IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL ~ND R~SOURCE8 W,II lhe Proposed Action al[ecL ~NO Jaqd (mclude~ c¢opland, ha'¢fie~d~, 8 1 2 Small to Polential Moderate Large ImpAct impact [] Can impact Be Mitigated By Project Change ©Yes E]No ~¥es ~r~o t~Yes ~¥es I--INo ~Yes ~No ~Yes ~¥es ~No [~Yes ~INo E3~es ff~No agrJcuRural land · The proposed action would i.'reverslbiy Convert more th.:n !0 acres of agricultural land or, d located in an A~ricuitural Dsstrict, mo,e than 2 5 acres of agricultural land * ?h~ p~opo.~ed action would d*stupt or prev~rd m~t~Ha;ion of a~rlcul/utal land management ~y~tems (e g. ~ubsutlace dr~m hnes, outJel ditches, held to drmn poorly due to increased runoJH ' Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed achon affect aesthetic resources? '~iO []¥[S {if necessary, use the V~.u~d E,&F Adder, dura m~e~:t~on 617 21, Appendix B Proposed land uses, g~' prowct component~ obviously ddterent from Other IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARiCHAEOLOGJCAL RESOURCES 12. Wdl Proposed Action impact any $~te or structure ?~hlstoric, pre- historic or paleontological ~mportance? ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Actton oc~urrm~ wholly or pariially within or substantially contiguous (o any facihW or s~te hsied on the Stat~ or National Register of h~seouc pl~ces · Any m~pact t~ an arch.uoloa~¢M site or fossd b~d located wghin the project sste · ProDos~d Achon wdl occur m an area de~nated as archaeological s~tes on the NYS S~te Inventory · Other impacts: .... IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECRF..ATION t3 Wdl Proposed Action Miect th= quantity or quality of extstmg or future open spaces or recreahonal Opportumties? Examples that would apply to column 2 ~O ~Y~S The pernianent foreclosure ota ~uture I~cr~ahoflaJ opportumty,~ ~ Other ~mpacts 0 1 2 Small to Potential Can Impact Bo Moderate Large Mitigatea By Impact impact Project Change -~ ~ ~Yes ~no ~ ~ '~ves []No [] ~ ~Ves gNo ~ ~ ~v~s Uno ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~ves ~no ~ ~ ~Ves ~No AND ODOR ,~MPAC, TS IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Wdl ~-=roposed ^l ~.ion aJfec~ pubJ~c he~Jth and ~xampl~s ~hat ~ould apply to column 2 e Proposed Acbon may cause a n~k o~ e~.pJosion o~ release of hazardou~ ~Li~s~ancus(;e olLpesh~de~,chemicais, rad~auo~Letc~mtheevent°f 10 I 2 Small to Potential Moderate Large Impac[ h~pac! ' ~---'~' ~ 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated Project Change ~No ~ No ~No r~No ~N,~ rq,' No J~]No Ilnl/ SOUTHOLD Town PLANNING B04RD ~MPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Will proposed action af;ec'~ the chnracter of the ex~stma commumty? ~0 ~YES [x~mples that wou~d apply to column 2 The petm~neot populahon of the c,h', town et v~lia~e in which th~ prelect ~s located i~ likely ~o grow by more ~ha~ 5% The mumc*p~l bud~e[ tot capita[ expenditures or operating serv,ces wd] increase by more [hah 5% Der year as a n~sult of this project Proposed action wdl c~u>e ~ ch~nie m the dens~ty of land use Development wdl create a demand for add,t,onai community ~ervtces (e.g schools, police and hre, etc} Proposed Action ~dl set an m~ort.n[ precedent for future Proposed Action wdl create or ehmmate employment Other ~mpacts I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Iml~s, ct Be Moderate L~rge Mitigated Dy Impact impact Project Change ~ ~ ~ves ~ U ~ves ~ ~Yes ~ U ~ves ~ ~ ~ves ~No !9 is there, or ,s there hkel¥ to be, pubhc controv.ersj related to pgtentidi adverse e~!ronment.~l ~ropacts~ "j~O [:]YES If Any Action in Part 2 t,~ Identified as a Polentlat Largo Impact or i! You Cannot Determine lha Ma~nltude of impact, Proceed to Part Part 3---EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS j Responsibility el Lead Aseney Pa~t 3 must be prepared it one or more'~mpaet{.s} is comiideted lo be potentially large, even Jf the impa, et(s) may be mitigated. I In~lructionS : Discuss thc tollowinji for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 Briefly descnbe the Impact 2 Describe {d applicable) how the m~pact could be mmgated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by proiect chan~s) 3 Based on the information avai!~ble, deoded ~t ts reasonable to conclude that th,s ~mpact is important. To answer the question of ~mporta~ce, con/drier, · lhe probablht¥ of the impact ~ccurrmg · The duration of the mtpact lis irreversb,lty, nc uding permanently ost resources o[ value Whether Ihe impact can or wil} be con:rol~ed The regional consequence OJ the impact * Its potential divergence ~rom JOcal needs and goals e Whether known objections to ihe p~oiect relate lo th,~ m~pacl 11 (515) 298-5800 PO Bo~ 3405 Re: Village MaYzne H.D. Ref. No. C10-91~003 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT ~F HEALTH SERVICES BUREAU OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT Suff~,lk County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 To Wh,)m It May Conce~nl ~e advised that tb~ prc,~c, sed m~al boat ~eDalr additl¢~n for the above-referenced D~o.j~,~t will ¢o~taln no toll~ ~ ' any e×i~tng toilets ~hali b~ for emoloye$ u~e Further, be a~vised that the pr,~Do~ed additl,~n will not result in an lncr~a~ in the number c,f emDl¢,y~ ~t the fa~lityo Further, bm advised that if the~e ¢~)ndittons ,~han~.~ in th~ fc~tu~e, the Suffolk County Depmrtment of Health Services shall notified immediately. David Young, bming dclly sworn, dep¢,ses and says that the signat~ of the above affidavit; that deponent ls signaler of the above affidavit! that d~ponet has read the f,~regoing affidavit and knc, ws th~ conte~t thmreof! that the ~ame is true to deponent's ~wn Tltlet Ilil I A ~'~ I'I II # A r,I i A i iI COMpLI'"i" MARINE SERVICES _1 August i, !991 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF .... ~L~H o~,ccS Suffolk County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 Attention of Mr. Bob Jewell Dear Bob: In reference to our phone call of 07,;31/9! nlfa~e a~e~,~-- ~'~ fidavlt f,o.,~ ~ Village Marine ' '~ shall be closed %o the public aed for om~l~v~. -~.~ Jse only. This Ietter ls also to conflrm that the:::~,~:¢~n.~,~ ~as~,~x~¢~5.~ ...-~"~C:- ~ ~¢e m!d- ~950's, which ailows less than a a total site flow, with private water, o~~": .... ~',~P~', whlcq ~s' ~a~e:m:n,' ~ for the existing frame building and the eniarmed ~et,~! &oat reN]r s~ed. Also be adv[sed that the en~ ~ ~ ~'~ ' ho~r ~ill not "¢~"~ ' ta~y system. Thank you for your a¢ i .... ~ cs stanc: in thisma~, . Slrcerely, ~rald Anderus GA:bmc CC: Pat Floria Emclosure ~IIE 1~I EIB R B THE ANIaRI:AN INSTITUT~ [:]t: ARCHITECT; New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40--SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 (516) 751-1389 Thomas C. Jorllng Commissioner October 10, 199i Land Use Company 2576 Sound Ave. Baiting Hollow~ NY 11933 Attn: Tanya Lachemmeyer Dear Ms. Lachenmeyer: RE: NYSDEC Permit Application ~1-4738-00341/00001-0 ~illage Marine The department has received alState Environmental Qual~ity Review qetter of coordination from the Southold Town Planning~ Board for the above referenced action. The department has accepted the Planning Board, as lead agency in the review. A Notice of Determination of Significance or Acceptance of a Final Environmental Impact Statement must be issued before the department can issue any permits to Vilqage Marine. The department is'in receipt of a Notice of Negative Determination of Significance from the Town of Southold Board of Appeals; however as it has become evident that a coordinated review was not done, the department has now agreed to participate in the required coordinated review. (The action is in a critical environmental area and has been classified a type I action, which requires coordination.) Please call me with any questions. Sincerely, Karen Munze Senior Environmental Analyst KAM/nw cc: Village Marine Towp oflSOuthold Planning Board Town of~S6uthold BOard of App~hls File SOUTHOLD:TOWN ~LANNING BOARD 8TONY BROOK, NE'~ YORK 11790.255~ New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Td~2.~,,~ j~)'-~c~Ct~d'/O/ Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION RESPONSE This letter responds to your communication of ~/~z~t/~/r z~7~c/~/, regarding lead agency coordination for the above-noted project, under Article/8 (State Environmental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. The Department has the fo]lowing interest in this project: DEC Permits (if any): DEC Contact Person: SEQR Classification: [X] Type I [ ] Unlisted DEC Position: Based on the information provided: DEC has no objection to your agency assuming lead agencv status for this action. ' [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. [ ] DEC needs additional information in order to respond (see comments). [ ] DEC cannot be lead agency because it has no jurisdiction in this action. Comments: [ ] see attached [ ] none If you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above, please contact this office to resolve designation of lead agency within the time allowable under Part 617. Please feel free to contact this office for further information or discussion. Sincerely, cc: (attach distribution list) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kennelh L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO~IT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 October 17, 1991 David G. Young Village Marine P.O.Box 1045 Mattituck, New York 11952 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Village Marine E/s Bay Avenue, 140' S/o SR 25, Mattituck, N.Y. Dear Mr. Young: The Planning Board's environmental consultant has quoted a price of $500 to review your Long Environmental Assessment Form. When we receive a check in this amount, made out to the Town of Southold, our consultant will be authorized to begin work. A copy of the estimate is enclosed for your information. If you have any questions, please contact this office for assistance. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Enc. VS:vs Bennett ©rlowski~ Jr., Chairman Southo!d Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: EAF Review Dear l~Ir. Orlowski, Jr., It is es%imated that the cost application as per your letter of not exceed $ _~O.e~ of reviewing the above-noted do ~ , 1991 should No work in excess of that amount %;ii1 be , M~-~ t-n~_~=ken by this office unless so authorized by the Planninc Bos. r~ in writing. Plegse notify this office in %4ritin9 if you ;~'ish us to undertake the review. Associates DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS I COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE October 15, 1991 JOSEPH P. HURLEY. P.E. COMMISSIONER Town of Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman ~E: Not On County Hoa~ VILLAGE NA~I#E Gentlemen: ~e have reviewed the above referenced SEOR^. Specifically note that: Since this proposed development is not adjacent to a County maintained road or a road proposed for improvements by the County, a permit wlll not be required from this Department. If yeu have any questions, kindly contact this office at 852-3099. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, [UL/MPC/3 fb 335 YApHANK AVENUE Richard J. LaValle Acting Chief Engineer ['l,i Paul Campagno~a,~' Permits Engineer SUFFOLK COUNTY iS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACT APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD scour L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 October 16, 1991 Ms. Karen Munze, Sr. Env. Analyst N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40 - SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Re: Your Communications of October 10, 1991 NYSDEC Permit ~1-4738-00341/00001-0 (village Marine) Dear Ms. Munze: We are in receipt of your October 10, 1991 communications in the above matter, and pursuant to our telephone conversation today, we would like to clear any misunderstanding or misinformation that may have been reflected in any of the permit files concerning a SEQRA declaration made by the Board of Appeals in the above matter. The Board of Appeals has declared the setback variance application to be a "Type II" action {similar to exempt actions relative to setbacks, which is the same rule applicable to the Suffolk County Critical Environmental Area, Section 4(2) thereof}, although the Town Trustees and NYS DEC were not Type II actions, having previously determined Negative Declarations under SEQRA in 1988-89 and notice in the Environmental Bulletin. (It was later, in April 1990, that a setback variance with the Board of Appeals was applied for and later processed.) In any event, our department is not an involved agency at this time but wish to be included as an interested agency. For your file and information, we are enclosing the following: a) copy of our Type II Declaration adopted by the Board of Appeals; b) copy of Town Trustees approval (and recent PLANNING BOARD c) copy of communications concerning the bulkhead proposed during 1986 from the NYS Department of State; d) copy of the Environmental Bulletin publication (1989) concerning a DEC Permit pending under 910-88-1869. e) copy of Section 37-7(A) of the Suffolk County Charter (CEA) effectuated in March 1989. Thank you for your courtesies. Very truly yours, Linda Kowalski Enclosures cc: Southold Town Trustees - Southold Town Planning Board/ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, .Ir. .Ioscph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, .Ir. Te|¢phone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOU~OLD May 15, 1990 S,~.O.~.A. . SCO'I']' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 . Fax (516) 765-1823 Teiephone (516) 765-1800 Appeal No. 3938 Project/Applicants: County Tax Map No. Location of Project: Village Marine 1000- 122-3-15.1 175 Bay Ave., Mattituck, NY Relief Requested/Jurisdiction Before This Board in this Project: Permission to enlarge marina building and install boat rack (outside) This Notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. An Envi~onmental. Ass~ssm~nt.(Sh~rt) Form has.been s~bmitted with the subject application lndlcatlng that no Significant adverse environmental effects are likely to occur should be project be implemented as planned. It is determined that this Board's area of jurisdiction concerning setback, area or lot-line variances determines this application to fall under the established list of Type II Actions. Pursuant to Section 617.2jj, this Department is :excluded as an involved agency. This determination shall not, however, affect any other agency,s interest as an involved agency under SEQRA 617.2jj. For further information, please contact the Office of the Board of Appeals, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 at (516) 765-1809. mc TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, HI, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. John L. Bednosld, Ir. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCO'IT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 June 11, 1991 Land Use 2576 Sound Avenue Baiting Hollow, N.Y. 11933 RE: Village Marine Permit #10-88-122-3-15.1 Dear Ms. Lachenmeyer: The following actions were taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on June 6, 1991: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees approve the request for an extension to permit #~0-88-122-3-15.1 to expire on April 28, 1992. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB: jmt STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALBANY. N.Y. 12231 April 25, 1986 Mr. Charles W. Bowman The Land Use Company P.O. Box 361 Wading River, NY 11792 Re: F-86-054 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/NY District Permit Application#86-250-L2 Village Marine, Town of Southold Dear Mr. Bowman: The Department of State has completed its evaluation of your Federal Consis- tency Assessment Form and certification that the above proposed permit activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management Program, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with this program. Pursuant to 15 CFR Section 930.63, and based upon the project information submitted, the Department of State concurs with your consistency certification subject to the following condition: The proposed bulkhead shall be placed above the line of spring high water (SHW) as indicated in the attached letter, dated April 17, 1986, to the Department of State. This concurrence is without prejudice to, and does not obviate the need to obtain all other applicable licenses, permits, and approvals required under existing State statutes. A copy of this decision has been sent to the Corps of Engineers with a copy of your April 17, 1986 letter and its attached site plan. Enclosures GRS:DEB:dlb CC: Sin~rely, ' Coastal Programs Administrator Alex Lechich, COE/NY (w/enclosures) Charles Hamilton, NYS DEC/Region I (w/enclosures) Henry P. Smith, Southold Board of Trustees (w/enclosures) HENRY P. S3i[TH, President JOHN M. BREDE3~EYER, Vice-Pres. PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 April 25, 1986 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Glenn E. Just Land Use Company Route 25 A Box 2521 Wading River, New Yo~k 11792 Dear Mr. Just: The regular No. 349 following action was taken by the Board of Trustees at their meeting held on April 24, 1986 regarding the Wetland Application on behalf of Village Marine. Moved by Trustee Smith seconded by Trustee Bredemever WHEREAS, the Land Use Company on behalf of Village-Marine applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated January 19, 1986 , and WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town' Trustees with respect to said application on April 24, 1986 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, the Board considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and it is noted for the record that there has been no public opposition; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety, and general welfare of the people of the Town, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Land Use Company on behalf of Village Marine be and ~ted permission to--construct aDprox~~lm~ ulkhead at or abovethe ~--~ ~e e ge ~-~-~r~'~ U~nU~m~~ from ~ ll- an upland site wzll De trucmea zn and place DeBind the DulKneao. -- Property is located on Bay Avenue, Mat~-uck. TBis permit is granteo under the provisions of the Wetland Ordl~c~ o~ the Town o~ Soutno±d. This permit will expire on April 24, 19--~7 if work has not commendeo by same. There are two inspections requ~ ~nd the Trustees are to be notified upon comoletion of the work--. -- -2- There is a $5.00 Wetland Inspection fee now due and payable. Upon remittance youre permit will be forwarded by mail. HPS:ip ~c: Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees ilene Pfifferling Clerk to Trustees Southold Town Building Dept. Commissioner Henry G. Williams, D.E.C., Charles Hamilton, D.E.C., Stony Brook Army Corps of Engineers Trustees file Albany Public Notice US Army of Engine~r~ New York D~strlct In repiylng refer to: Public Notice No.12545_86_250_L2 Publlshed?~ar 4 1986 Expires:Apr 2 1986 To Whom It May COncern: This District has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to J("-~ Section /_._~ section APPLICANT: Mattituck, New York 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403); 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Village Marine Bay Avenue 11952 ACTIVITY: Bulkhead construction and backfill WATERWAY: James Creek, Great Peconic Bay LOCATION: Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York A detailed description and plans of the applicant's activity are inclosed to assist in. your review. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the activity must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All. factors which may be relevant to the activity will be considered including the cumulative effects thereofl among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food production and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. ALL COM}tENTB REGARDING THE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST BE PREPARED IN WRITINC AND MAILED TO PEACH THIS OFFICE BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS NOTICE, otherwise it will be presumed that there are no objections to the activity. Any person may request, in writing to the district engineer, before this public notic._ expzres, tha~ a public hearing be held to collect information necessary to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons why a public hearing should be held. It should be noted that information submitted by mail is considered just as carefully in the permit decision process and. bears the same weight as that furnished at a public hearing. NANy FL-129 ~ay 83 Resulatory Branch Public Notice No.12545-86-250-L2 Pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531) and based upon a review of the latest published version of the threatened and endangered species listing, a preliminary determination is that the activity under consideration will not affect those species listed or their critical habitat. Based upon a review of the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places, there are no known sites eligible for or included in the Register within the permit area. Presently unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical or historical data may be lost by work accomplished under the required permit. Reviews of activities pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act will include application of the guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, under authority of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act and the applicant will obtain a water quality certificate or waiver from the appropriate state agency in accordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act prior to a permit decision. Pursuant to Section 307(c) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended (16 U.S.C. 1456(c)), for activities under consideration that are located within the coastal zone of a state which has a federally approved coastal zone management program, the applicant has certified in the permit application that =he activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved state coastal zone management program. By this public notice, we are requesting the state's concurrence with, objection to, or waiver of the applicant's certification. No permit decision will be made until one of these actions occur. For activities within the coastal zone of New York State, the applicant's certification and accompanying information is available from, and any comments on, should be addressed to the New York State Department of State, Division of Local Government and Community Services, Coastal Management Program, 162 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12231 Telephone (518) 474-5063. In addition =o any required water quality certificate and coastal zone management program concurrence, the applicant has obtained or requested the following governmental authorizations for the activity under consideration: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Tidal Wetlands Town of Southold Wetlands Permit It is requested that you communicate the foregoing information concerning the activity to any persons known by you =o be interested and who did not receive a copy of this notice. If you have any questions concerning this application, you may contact this office at t 'eph~ne (212) 264~913 and ask for Mr. Alex Lecbicb. Permit 2 Incls: 1. Description of Work 2. Drawing(s) F.H. Griffis Colonel, Corps of Engineers Distr£ct Engineer NAMY FL-129-1 b~y 83 2 PAGE 3 COMPLETED APPLICATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ENB-- REGION 1 REGION 1 REGION 1S REGION 1N NASSAU COUNTY 80 Waterfront Ltd. 4042 Austin Blvd. Island Park, NY 11558 Majestic Marina 217 Woodcleft Ave. Freeport, NY t1520 SUFFOLK COUNTY W. G. Rafferty 795 Prospect Ae. W. Hartford, CT 06105 Peter G. Peterson 237 Park Ave. New York, NY ~00t7 Village Marina by Land Use Company 2576 Sound Avenue Baiting Hollow,NY ~ t933 includes: Nassau & Suffolk Counties. For information regarding any application notice in Region 1, contact the following: DEC Bldg. 40, SUNY Campus, Stony Brook, NY 11794 Suffolk County Health Dept., County Center, Riverhead, NY 11901 Nassau Co. Health Dept., 240 Old Country Rd., Mineola, NY 11501 (516)751-7900 (516)548.3319 Ext. 568 (516)535-3313 Last Filing Date The applicant proposes to dredge a 220 ft. by 365 ff. marine facility to a depth of five feet at mean Iow water using a barge with crane and clamshell; 5,000 cu. yds. of spoil will be removed by barge and disposed ct in an upland area. Sediment analysis should be acne betore dredging takes place. The project is located on the southwesi corner of Waterfront Blvd. and Beach Ave.. Island Park, Town of Hempstead, Nassau County. NCTM 43-19-263 & 264. SHPA--2 Permit: Tidal Wetlands, Water Quality. and Protection of Waters UPA--t0-89-0437 CONTACT: Susan Ackerman The applicant proposes to construct above mean high water, 80 ft. of navy bulkhead and backfill with 25 cu. yds. clean upland fill. There is no dredging associated with this project. The praiect is located an Woadcleft Bay, Woodcleff Ave., Freeport, Town of Hempstead, Nassau County. Permit: Tidal Wetlands, Protection of Waters and Water Quality UPA--t0-89-0484 CONTACT: Marilyn E. Petersan The applicant proposes the renovation of an existing garage/apadment, and the construction of a 400 sq. ft. addition on sono tube piers. No excavation will be done except for piers and septic system. The addition will be 65 feet from Freshwater Wetlands, and the septic system will be approximately I00 feet from the wetland. The project is located on Fishers Island - Middle Farms Pond, Town of So_utl~old, Suffolk County. SCTM ~000-003-7-5. SHPA--2 Permit: Freshwater Wetlands UPA--10-89-0558 CONTACT: Susan Ackerman The applicant proposes the construction of a timber retaining wall and stairway in order to redesign lawn area and driveway. All improvements will occur in areas of existing lawn or existing driveway. All driveway and parking areas will be constructed of permeable materials. No naturally vegetated areas will be disturbed during construction. The project is located on Fowler Street, Phillips Pond, Town of Southampton, Suffolk County. SCTM 904-30-~-60.002 SHPA--2 Permit: Freshwater Wetlands UPA--10-89-0647 CONTACT: Susan Ackerman The applicant has revised plans previously noticed on 1/26/89. The applicant now proposes to remove existing 26 ft. by 36 ff, metal building and construct a 40 ft. by 60 ft. boat repair and storage building and an 8 ft. by 40 ff. equipmenl storage building at the Village Marine located at 175 Bay Avenue, Mattituck. The proposed building location is 27 ft. landward of an existing bulkhead and redui~es a 48 ft. variance fta the regulated 75 ft. setback, The pralect is located in the Town at Southold, Suffolk County. SHPA--2 Permit: Tidal Wetlands UPA--t0-88-1869 CONTACT: Katy Murphy 6/16/89 6/~6/89 6/16/89 Office '1 3B 3B R~$OLUTION NO. - ~988, ADO~INQ 5OCAL LAW NO. ~AR 1988, A CHARTER LA~ TO TH~ D~SIGNATION OF CRITICAL E ~ VIRO~ENTAL AR~A (~CONIC BA~) ' WHEREAS, ~ere wa~ duly p~esented and ~ntrodu~ed to thl~ ~ u~': wi~h. ~he nature of ~conic ~y an~ l~s ~dia~e surrounding area: Probation/ and 7.) tha~ It Na~rs or con,sine habitatl for endanqe~e Or ~stantially contiguoul to ~ch a~ea will be co'side,ed as ~e I attic under t~e N~ YO~ STATE ENV~E~ QUACXTy 22-1985, thereby lncrla~ing ~e l~kl~hood ~hat envtron~ntal l~act wX~l have to be prepaNed for ~ro]ects and/or actions c~nced 2.) Sec:ion Thre~. Expansion of Critical Enviro~m~ntal kr.~a. Section 37-7(A} of the SUFFOLK COUNTY CHARTER ls hereby amended by t~ addition of a new 9uDsection 9 to read as follows: 7-7 particularly described Oe~, are ~ere~y desiqna~ed a~ crit~c~ S~CC~on fo~. ~onl. 3.) ~ri~u ltu~a~ farm ~e~n~ pz'ac~%ce~ lnc ~udi 6.] installation of traffic control devices on existxng ~tree ~oads, and ~ghways; removal of trees o~ the application o~ herbicides or pastLcLde~; Land Use nctober 9, 1991 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Ms. Valerie Scopez Re: Application by Village Marine Mattituck, New York Dear Ms. Scopez: As promised in my 10/1/91 letter, enclosed please find (9) copies of the revised site plan for the project as referenced above. Should you have any questions or require additional information, kindly contact this office at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, Tanya LachenmeyerM TL/cf enclosure OCT II 1991 · ~OUTHOLD TOWN P,./~tNIK~i BOARD 2576 Sound Avenue · Baiting Hollow, New York · 11933 (516) 727-2400 · FAX (516) 727-2605 N~w York State Depa~ment of Environmental Con~ This letter responds to your communication of .l[~.,~'~r/~.- ~.~./, regarding lead agency eoo:'dination for the above-noted project, under Article'S (State Environmental Quslity Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. The Department has the fo]lowing interest in this project: DEC Contact Perso._n: ,~,~¢_,~, SEQR Classification; [Lq Type I [ 1 Unlisted DEC Position: Based on the information provided: DEC has no objection :o your agency a~suming lead agency status for this action, [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency stetus for this action. [ j DEC needs additional information tn order to respond (see comments). DEC cannot be lead agency because it has no jurisdiction in this action. Comments: [ ] see attached none if you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above, please contact this office to resolve designation of lead agency within the time allowable under Part 617. Please fee! free to contact this office for further information or discussion. Sincerely, ce: (attach distHbutiom list) Land Use October 1, 1991 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Ms. Valerie Scopez Re: Application by Village Marine Mattituck, N.Y. Dear Ms. Scopez: As per your request, enclosed please find a completed Full Environmental Assessment Form prepared for the project as referenced above. Upon their receipt, I will forward (9) copies of the revised site plan to your attention. Should you have any questions or require additional information, kindly contact this office at your convenience. very truly yours, Tanya Lachenmeyer V TL/cf Enc. 2576Sound Avenue · Baiting Hollow, NewYo~ · 11933 (516) 727-2400 · FAX (516) 727-2605 .. P · 14-16-2' (2/87)-- 7c ,. 617.21 SEQR Appendix A - State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The fuji FAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge Jn one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the d~termination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: X Part I [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a signif-icant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may ha~;e a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Village Marine - Proposed Boat Repair/Storage Building Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Pre(pa'~r {If different from responsibie ~i~ficer) 9/30/91 Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTt¢E: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance· NAME OF ACTION Proposed Marine Repair/Storage Building LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) 175 Bay Avenue, Mattituck, Suffolk NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Village Marine BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516 ~- 298-5800 ADDRESS C[TYIPO P.O. Box 1045 STATE I ZIP CODE Mattituck, N.Y. [ 11952 NAME OF OWNER (If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ) ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed an,~/undeveloped 1. Present land use: [2)Urban I-Ilndustrial /~Commercial I-IForest I-1Agriculture DOther 2. Total acreage of project area: .54 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or 8rushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type)Gravel Boat Storaqe/Parkinq Area areas. rqResidential (suburban) E3Rural (non-farm) 0 PRESENTLY AFTERoCOMPLETION · acres acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres O acres O acres O acres O acres · I 4 acres .19 acres · 40 acres .35 acres 3. What is predominant soil, type(s) on project site? Rc~ - Riverhead Sandy Loam a. Soil drainage: '~Well drained 100 % of site I-IModerately well drained % of site r-IPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres. (See I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? rqYes a. What is depth to bedrock? 600+ ' (in feet) 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION - VILLAGE MARINE construct a 40'x 60' building location is requires a 46.4' Applicant proposes to remove existing 26'x 36' metal building and boat repair and storage building. Proposed 28.6' landward of the existing bulkhead and variance to the regulated 75' setback. Additionally, applicant proposes to pave, with asphalt, a 595 s.f. area landward of the existing bulkhead. As mitigation, applicant will install drainage pools to contain stormwater runoff. '5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~-10% 100 % [10-15% % [15% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or,c~ntain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? []Yes ~i~JNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [Yes ~'No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0 '-8 ' {in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I~Yes /~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? E~Yes XNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? [~Yes ~No According to Field Inspection · Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [Yes ~No Describe 13. Is the project sit~/presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? r~Yes j~hNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present,~e include scenic views known to be important to the community? E3Yes D~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: James Creek a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Great Peconic Bay 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? XYes I~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? XYes I~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [l-lYes ~1~o (Expansion of existing use) 18. Is the site located in an agricultur~,~,district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? []Yes ~[~,No 19. Is the site located in or substantially,/ontiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes [qNo (Tributary to Peconic Bay) 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? F~Yes f-lNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled byprqject sponsor ' 5z] .05 t expansion) b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; .05 c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: n/a (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 5 ; proposed 10 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 8 (upon completion of project.)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: n/a One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure * height; 60 ' width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 50 · less than 35' 3 acres. acres ultimately. Condominium 40 ' length. ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? I-lYes E:]No ~N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [:]Yes [No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? fqYes []No 0 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature/forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? rqYes [~No 3 6. If single phaser project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). (number). 7. If multi-phased: n/a a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? fqYes ~JNo 5 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? month month [:]Yes I~No ; after project is complete tons/cubic yards I~Yes year, (including demolition). year. 2 If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes ]~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? I-lYes o Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain ~y 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? es 16. Will the project generate solid waste? /J~Ye§ 't~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I~Yes I-INo c. If yes, give name Southold Town Landfill ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain *existing sanitary system to be up~ £ ~d~d [Yes [3No ~No Southold, N.Y. [Yes I~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? []Yes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life?. .~, ~ars. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I-lYes ANo tons/month. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [Yes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the ~z~al ambient noise levels? 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? /l~Yes E~No If yes , indicate type(s) electricity, heating'oil I~Yes ~,~o 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? fqYes If Yes, explain gallons/minute. **(existing facility - no increase needed) · 25. APprovals Required: City, Town, Village Board [:]Yes ,,~No City, Town, Village Planning Board /~es City, Town Zoning Board F~Yes ~[No City, County Health Department ~"Yes [No Other Local Agencies [Yes ~]'No Other Regional Agencies F1Yes t.l~No State Agencies ~es I~No Federal Agencies []Yes ~No Type Site Plan Approval Sanitary System Upgrade N.Y.S.D.E.C. Art. 25 Submittal Date 10/88 Pending 10/88 C. Zoning and Planning Information I. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? //~/Yes ~JNo If Yes, indicate decision required: [zoning amendment ~]zoning variance I~special use permit I~subdivision ~/site plan ~-lnew/revision of master plan I~resource management plan r~other 2. What is the zoning classificatioe(s)of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning~ Marina . 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning~ Marina . 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? /~Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? Existing commercial development north, east & west, residential development south g. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? '~Yes l~No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? n/a a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization{s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [:]Yes '~No 11. Will the proposed action creat,,e, a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? [-1Yes ~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand~ [Yes []No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels~ I~Yes ~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additiona traffic? F~Yes I~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge Applicant/Spj~j2~er Name Tanya Lachenmeyer/Land Use Company for VillageHarine n/~ with this assessment, ncy, I o proceeding 5 Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonablet' The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant, Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change{s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By impact impact Project Change [] [] E]Yes [--I No [] [] I~Yes I~No [] [] E']Yes ~-INo [] [] I-lYes r-]No [] [] E]Yes I-~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No iMPACT ON LAND I. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the proiect site.~ E]NO nYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 1OO foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface.' · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material {i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. will there be an effect to any unique or unusual [and forms found on the site.~ (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ENO [:]YES · Specific land forms: IMPACT ON WATER 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, EEL) r~No [~YE$ Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? C1NO [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? [:]NO [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 §allons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in' excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ~INO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [-]Yes [-INo [] [] I--lyes []No [] [] ~lYes ~-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? [~NO E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? l-lNG r~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? E]NO ~IYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? fqNO [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes l--lNG [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [-~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] E]Yes []No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ENO [YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? []NO [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities.~ Examples that would apply to column 2 I~NO I~YES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes [-'[No [] [] []Yes I--)No [] [] I-lYes I~No [] [] ['-]Yes I-~No [] [] []Yes E~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [:3Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] F-lyes []No [] [] [:]Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ENO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuet or energy supply~ ~tNO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action~ [NO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? [3NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc. I in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may ~'esult in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: 10 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I--lYes I-]No [] [] []Yes I~No [] [] I-lyes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I--INo [] [] [-']Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [--]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [-]Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []NO [] [] l--lYes I--INo IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? E3NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I~No [] [] [~] Yes [-]No [] [] ['-]Yes r-lNo [] [] [-]Yes I--]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E~No [] [] []Yes E3No [] [] []Yes r-]No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts~ [:]NO I-lYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitisated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project chan§e(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goaJs · Whether known objections to the project re[ate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 Bennett Orlowskt, Jr., Chairman Southo!d Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski, Jr., It is es%imated that the cost of reviewing the above-noted application as per your letter of /O --~ 1991 should not exceed $ ~-~. ~ ' No work in excess of that amount will be undertaken by this office unless so authorized by th~ Planning Bosrd Pleas~ ~' ~ no~fy ~h~s office in writing if you wish us to undertake the review. -~y-nuts, ~L~ramcr, Voorh2$ & Associates PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOq'T L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review ACt-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: .Your jurisdiction in the action described below; ~. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead /agency; and Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: ~_.~~ ~/~ /~m~--/~-- ~ _/~U./ Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: (>~) Type I ( ) Unlisted (516)-765-f93F The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty.(30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (,~'~ This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( Comments: Please feel free to contact cc: /Board of Appeals ~ ~'Board of Trustees % ~/Building' Department this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman ~Southold Town Board v~Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services~ ~/NYSDEC - Stony Brook ~ v~I~YSDEC - Albany% S.C. Dept. of Public Works U.S. Army Corp of Engineers N.Y.S. Dept. of Transportation * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD:OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appl. NO. 3938: Matter of the Application of VILLAGE MARINE for Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-112, Article XII, Section 100-111C(1), Article XXIII, Section 239.4, and Article XIX, for permission to construct addition to existing principal building with insufficient setbacks from the bulkhead, the easterly (rear) property line, maintaining the nonconforming northerly (side) setback, and to locate boat storage structure (boat rack) with insufficient setbacks from the northerly (side), westerly, easterly property lines, and bulkhead. Also requested is relief, as may be deemed necessary concerning parking and/or landscaping under the current revisions of the site plan regulations. Zone District: Marine I (M-I). Property location: James Creek, east side of Bay Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 122 Block 3, Lot 15.1. ' At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on November 29, 1990 the following action was taken: 'WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted into ~he record concerning this application; and WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, its previous zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, this project has received conditional approval from the Southold Town Trustees and has received a Negative Declaration under the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) by the Town Trustees for this project; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, applicant requests variances to the zoning code as to area setbacks in the proposed: (a) removal of an existing 36' by 26' metal building presently 16cated at the rear {east} of the principal building and in Page 2 -Appl. No. 3938 Application of VILLAGE MARINE Decision Rendered November 29, 1990 place thereof a proposed 60 ft. by 40 ft. addition, and (b) proposed boat rack of a size ll ft. by 102 ft. {1122 sq. ft. ground area}. The outside area of the site, as well as the existing metal building, has been used for the service, maintenance and/or repair of boats docked at the owner's marina facility, and the addition would encompass the same activities. The boat rack is proposed to compactly store boats which are presently stored for service or repair about the site. The placement of both the addition and the boat rack storage structure will not meet the current requirements of the zoning code as provided under the landscaping or parking requirements and for which relief is also requested. 2. The premises in question is located on the easterly side of Bay Avenue in the Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold, contains a total upland area of approximately 23,645 square feet, and total area as shown on the Suffolk County Tax Maps and assessors records of 39,640+- square feet. 3. The subject premises is located in the Marine I Zone District and is and has since prior to the enactment of zoning in 1957 been used for outside boat storage, as well as marina uses, retail uses, engine and boat repairs, servicing, maintenance, sales to the general public, incidental office use, and other related marina uses, and uses accessory thereto. 4. The premises is bounded on the north by a gasoline service station: on the west by a town road (Bay Avenue) and opposite Bay Avenue, a bank; on the east by a real estate office located in the General Business (B) Zone District and partly by a right-of-way which is in the R-40 Residential Zone District; on the south by the existing marina at James Creek. The gasoline station abutting the premises on the north side is ..also located in the Marine I (M-I) Zone District as well as that area abutting to the south of the subject parcel. 5. The building addition and the storage rack, as proposed, are shown on the site plan prepared by Glueckert and Wieber, Architects, lastly dated October 18, 1990. The setbacks for the proposed addition are: (a) 28.6 feet at its closest point to the south along the tie line along wood bulkhead; (b) 48+- feet at its southeast corner to the tie line along the wood bulkhead; (c) at 3.0 feet, maintaining the same northerly side yard setback as the existing building(s); (d) 20+- feet to its closest easterly rear property line; (e) 63+- feet to the furthermost easterly property line, along land referred to as "R-O-W." Page 3 -Appl. No. 3938 Application of VILLAGE MARINE Decision Rendered November 29, 1990 6. The principal building and 36' by 26' metal building, are shown to be set back, as exist since prior to the enactment of zoning: ~. (a) from the southerly bulkhead 28+- feet at their closest points (both addition and metal building) and 42+- and 48+- feet at their furthest setback points, metal building and addition, respectively; (b) from the northerly side property line at 3+- feet at its closest point; (c) from the westerly front property line 32+- feet at its closest corner; (d) from the easterly property line at its closest point 80+- feet; 49+- feet to the existing metal building from the easterly property line. 7. The upland area of the site is unique in configuration, size, and character, and contains a smaller upland lot size and width than as provided in the current zoning code for total lot size and width. It is noted that although there have been seven parking spaces provided for the current uses and building area on this site, and the Master Plan regulations, as amended January 9, 1989 provides for different methods of calculating the number of parking spaces and the landscaping areas for newly established businesses or new uses. Any business, building or uses which have not been established prior to these amendments would apply under the new regulations, and those that have preexisted these regulations are bermitted to continue without a mandate to comply with the new regulations, provided there is no expansion or modified use. - ............ 8. It is the position of this Board that: (a) the addition to the existing principal building is not an expansion of the existing use, nor is it a newly created use, since the addition will be used by employees providing the same services and repair activities which have been conducted at the site in both the existing metal building and outside of the existing building areas and as each relates to the established marina and boat storage uses; (b) the addition to the existing principal building, as proposed, is an improvement that: 1. will provide a protected and heated area for the employees to service and make repairs; Page 4 -Appl. No. 3938 Application of VILLAGE MARINE Decision Rendered November 29, 1990 8 (b). ~ 2. will provide for the discontinuance of repairs in open areas at the site, and these open areas will now be made available for a reduction of congestion and provide better maneuverability and efficient and safe circulation for vehicles and pedestrians, and for parking which was not previously available to the same degree; 3. will make provision for a better parking : plan and for increased landscaping, which presently is not provided, and will encourage customers to park on-site rather than along Bay Avenue; 4. will provide all runoff or discharge into drywells or catch basins to prevent runoff into James Creek; (c) the uses and the property as now exists, and has~' existed in the past, do not violate zoning, have been legally established at the site, and are not prohibited under the zoning regulations from continuing; (d) although the Master Plan and Zoning Amendments were adopted subsequent to the establishment of this property and its uses, there is no question in this Board's view that the uses are conforming uses under the current zoning regulations. 9. In considering the application for the building addition to house existing activities without an expansion of use or boat storage area, the Board finds that: (a) the setbacks of the addition, as proposed, are not'excessive as compared to the existing established setback to the bulkhead at the southwesterly corner of the principal building; however, the relief in relation to the current zoning regulations, as amended, is substantial as to the total requirements; (b) the unique characteristics of the land and its limited buildable upland area lend to the hinderance of obtaining town approvals without Variances; (c) there will not be an increased intensity of use at the site; Page 5 -Appl. No. 3938 Application of VILLAGE MARINE Decision Rendered November 29, 1990 (d) if the variance for the addition were not granted, the same uses and services are allowed to continue and the effects of limited parking and landscaping or aesthetic effects on the surrounding area would not be enhanced except by voluntary abandonment by the property owner over which the town has no control; (e) the addition will not, in the board's view, be, harmful aesthetically or be substantially adverse to public health, welfare or safety of the community. (f) strict compliance with the zoning ordinance, as amended January 9, 1989 in the Master Plan Update, will cause practical difficulties since there is no other alternative to pursue, without a variance; [g) the relief, as alternatively granted, is not unreasonable and is the minimum necessary; (h) the relief, as alternatively granted, will not alter the essential character of this waterfront business and residential community; (i) attempts to improve the utilization of the premises are hindered due to the unique characteristics of the land; and sufficient proof has been demonstrated to show practical difficulties in the use and proposed improved development of his property necessitating the variance for the subject proposed addition; (j) the interests of justice will best be served by granting a variance, as alternatively noted below, for an addition to the proposed building. (k) the continued use, within the proposed building addition will not adversely affect the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience, and order of the town; (1) the addition and its use thereof are both in harmony with and will promote the general purposes and intent of zoning. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE, the relief requested for an unenclosed boat rack Storage structure of a size 11.0 by 102.0 feet, as applied; and Page 6 -Appl. No. 3938 Application of VILLAGE MARINE Decision Rendered November 29, 1990 RESOLVED, to alternatively APPROVE a 60 ft. by 40 ft. addition to the principal building, with reduction under the landscaping and parking regulations of the zoning code and as more particularly shown on the plan prepared by Glueckert & Wieber, Architects, lastly dated October 18, 1990, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Setbacks shall not be less than that applied for and shown on the October 18, 1990 plan; 2. Ten (10) on-site parking spaces shall be provided, which must remain Open and unobstructed at all times, and each stall must be painted or otherwise marked to be easily noticeable. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen and Dinizio. (Absent were Me,ruer Sawicki and Chairman Goehringer, who abstained in this matter.) This resolution was duly adopted. /~AMES DINIZYo,.ZjR' /~ -'CHAIRMAN PRO TEM .1 ,¥'t t,-:~'12/87]- 7c 617,21 Appendix A SEQR State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The fuji LAF ~ des~d to help apphcan[s and age,~ciet, determ,ne, m an orderly manner, who[her a P~Ol~Ct or achon may be s~gmhca~t Thequesdono~whe[heranactionmaybe~igmficant~snotalwaysea~vtoan~wer Frequent- ly, there are a~p~c[s o~ a pro~ect ~hat ~re ~ubject,ve or unmeasureab~e It is also unde;stood tha: ~hose who determine ~i~nificance may have Ii(tie or no /ormai knowledge of tho environment c,r may be techmcalJy exper~ m enwronmental analysis Inaddihon, m~nywho the question oJ slBmhcance ha~eknowled~u m one parJic~lar area may no~ be awareof the broader concerns atfectin~ The tull [AF ,s mntendcd to provide a method whereby appJicant~ and C~enc~es can be assured ~ha[ the d~te~mmahon gtocess ha~ been orderly, corj~pr6hen~jve ~n nature yet '~ ' FuLl [AF Componenls; The fuji EAF ,~ comprised ot th;ee pa~s: Parl 1; Provides oblectwe dat~ and informal,on abou[ a given project and its ~e By ~den[~ying basic prolec[ data, ,~ assls[s a rewewer m the analysis thai takes place in Par~s 2 and J Part 3: If a~)y *mpac~ in Part 2 ~s ,dentihed as potentially.large, then Part 3 ~s used to evaluate whether or no[ the impact ~ actually ~mportanI DI:T[RMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identity the Porlions of EAF completed I'or Ihi~ project: /~ Part 1 I~ Part 2 ~Part 3 Upon review of the miormat,~n recorded on th~ ~AF (Part~ 1 and 2 and 3 if appropr ate), and any mher supportm~ information, and considering both the ma~tudo and ~mportance el each impact, it ~S reasonably determined by the Jead a~uncy [hat A. The p~oject wdl not result ,n ~ny large *nd 'mportant impact(s) and, therefore, ~s one which will hal have a s~gn,hcan[ m~pdct off ~he env~roflment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a s~nlhcam effect on the env to)merit, there wdl not be a s~mf~can[ effec[ for [tn~ Unhsled Action because :he mmgation measures described ,n PART 3 have been required. therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' C The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may hav'e a signdicdnt mlpact on the env,ronment, theretore a pu~ilive declaration will be prepared. ' A Condihoned Negative Declaration Is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action ~~ ,Name Of Lead Agency -: ~._] Print or Type NameuJ ReH:onsibJeOfflcer in Lead Agency T~tle of Responsible Officer Sigtlature of t~esponslble Ofiic~r i~ ead Agency Signature oJ Pre~r (If different ~rom responsib~e~t,;e,~ 9/30/9] Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE· Thisdocumen[~de~ined toass~t ~ndeterm~ningwhether theact~on proposed may havea s~gnificant effect an the enwronment Please complete the er~hre form. Part~ A ~hrou~h [ Answers to these questions wdl be considered aspartof the appl~cation for app~o~al and may be subject t° ~urthef ve~'flcati°n and pubhc review Prov~deanyadd~t~onal mfom~aUon you bcheve w,ll be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 it is expected that completion of ~he fuji EAF w,II be dependent on reformation currentJy avadable and wdl not mvatve new ~tudies, research or investigation It ~nlormat~ofl teq~ifm~ ~uch addi[~on~l work ~s unavailable, so indicate and speedy each instance Prc~o~ed Ma~ine Re~air/Stora~e Bu~ldin~ ]75 Bay Avonue, Nattitl~ck~ Suffolk BU$1NE'~:] TELEPHONE (516 ~- 298-5800 Village Ma~ine ADOREG~ P.O. Box 1045 l C~tY~eO N. Y . 11952 t MattitucR, I DF_~CRIPTION OF ACTION PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Pleale Complete Each Question- ~ndicate N,A, if not applicable A. 811e Description Physicat setting of overall project, both developed an,~/undeveloped I Present land use. ~Urban ~]lndustrial )]~Commercial Fli~orest ~Aitriculture ~Other ~Residentia~ ~sub~rban) · 54 acres. 2. Total acreage of prolect area APPROXIMAI-E ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-aliriculturall Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) ~Rurai [non.farm Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Ar[ides 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface A~'ea Unvegetated [Rock, emth or fdl) Roads, buddings and other paved surfaces Other [Indicate typefGrav'~l Doat Storaqe/Parkin~ Area .40 ac[es ]. What ~s predom,nan[ sod, type[s) on prolect s,[e~ Rd - RJverhead Sandy Loam a. Soil drainage ~Well drained ]00 % of site ~Moderately well drained ~.~ % of site ~Foorly d~ained % of site b I( any a~ricultural land ~s involved, how many acres of soil a~e cias~ii,ed w~th,n ~o,I group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Clais~ficatmon SyHem~ acres (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. ~re thu~e bedrock outcroppings on pro[eot t~te[ ~Yes ~o a. What is depth to bedrock( . 600+' .. (in feet) 2 PRESENTLY AFTERc~OMPLETION 0 acres acres 0 acres Q acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres _ . Q acre~ O acres Q acres 0 acres · I 4 __ acre~ .... 19 acres · 35 acres ~ROJECT DESCRIPTION - VILLAGE MARINE Applicant construct building .~qu~~es proposes to remove existing 26'x 36' metal building and a 40'x 60' boat repai? and storage building. Proposed locatlon ~ 28,5' landward ol the existing bulkhead and a 46.4' variance to the regulated 75' setback. Additionally, applicant proposes to pave, with asphalt, a 595 s.f. area landward o~ the existing bulkhead. AS mitigation, applicant will install drainage pools to contain stormwater runoff. '~ ^ppro~mate percentage of propu~ed prelect .~,,~. vv~th si,:~pes. ~.i0% i 0~. % DiE1 S% % ~15% or gre~ter % 6. Is protect substam~ally cont~g~ous to or contain a budding, s~e, or district, Jisied on the State or thc National Reg,sters of Historic Places/ ~v ~ 7. Is project s ~b~.ant~d? co ~uc, us ,o a s~te i,:.ted on the Register of NaUonal Natural L~ndmarks? ~Yes ~No 8 Wh~tisthe depth olth~ ~te~tablet 0'-8' [inleet) ~N o 9. Is s~te located over ~ pr,mary, pnnopal, or ~ole source aquifer? ~Yes / 10. Do hunting, hshmg or shell fishing opportunmes prestently exist m the protect are~? ~Yas - ~No 11 Does pro~ect s~tu contain any spaOes Gl ~lant or animal Ide that ~s ~dentd~ed as threatened or endangeredl According ~o ~ield ~nspection · 12. Are there any umque or unusual land lo,ms on the project s,te? g.e, cliffs, dunes, o~het ~eoJogical formalsonsj Descrsb< 13 Is the projec! sd~presently used by the community or netghhorhood as an open space or recreahon area.' L~Ye~ ~-,'~No If ~eS, explain 14 Does the present~e include ~cemc wews ~'nown to be imporlant to ~he community? OVe~ ~o 15 Streams wmthm or cent,genus ~o prelect area James C~eek a Name al S~r~am and name of R,~r to which ~t is tributary Great Peconic Bay 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland .:rcus wmthm or conh~uou~ to prolect area: a Name b Size (In acres) a) It Yes. does sufficient capacm~ e~st to allow connection? ~Yes ~No b) I~ Yes, will ~mpro~ements be necessary 1o allow connection~ ~' ~No(~ansi°n of ~is¢lng use) 1~ Is d~e si~e located m an agncuhu~l/d~stnct cemhed pursuant lo'A~icul~ute and Markets Law, Amde 25.AA. Secbon 303 and 3041 ~Yes 19. Is the site located in at substant,all~onu~uous to a Critical [nvironmental Area of Ihe ECL'and 6 NYCRR b17~ ~Yes ~No (~[bu~ary to Peeon~¢ Bay) 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of sohd or hazardous wa~tes¢ ~Yes ~No B. ProJact Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of p/eject {fill in dimensions as appropcsate). 54 a ]',;,iai conthguOuS acreage owned o~'.cgnFolled b~prqject sponsor .Uh ~e×'pansl on) b Project ~creage to be developed: acres inmalJy; ,05 c. Project acreage to remain ut. developed 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: n/a (if appropriate) e If the project ~s an e~.panslon, indicate percent of expansmn proposed n/a %; f Number ot C, lf-stree[ parking spaces ex~stin~ 5 g. Maximum vehicular trips ~enerated per hour 8 h. If res~denhal: Nomber and type of housin~ um~s ~/a One Famdy Two Famdy Multiple Famdv . Imdally Ultimately I D~menslons (m feeH of la~ge~t proposed Structure * height; ] Liflear feet et ~rontage along a pubiiC thoroughfare prelect will occupy is~ . ~0 · les~ Chart 35~ 3 ; proposed 1 0 (upon completion of project)t Condom,mum 6.0 ' width, 40 ' . lenltth it 3. Will disturbed area~ m: reclaimed? ~Yes ~No .,~NIA b W,~i top,od he ~(ockp:ied for reclam..u~n? ~Ye~ 0 ? [i muk~ ph.~ed n/a Approx,matc completion dale oi final phase phase i iuncbonaity dependenl on subsequent phases;' 5' 0 0 month year, t ~ ¢tudm~ d,~molihon! month year. ~Ye5 r~No ~'r'e~, o if ;'es, e~plaln 12 13 l~ subsurface i~qud waste d;sp,:,sa[ mvoived? f-"r% ~No f~pe [xpiam 16, WitI :he prolecl generate sohd waste'? ~Yes ~No a. If yes, what is lhe amounl per month ~ _ Ions b I[ yes, will an exishn~ mhd wasle e. Il Yes. e~pJam *existing sanitary system to be ~No ~No Southold, N.Y. L3Yes E}No f 1Z Wdl ~he project m¢ol,~e the disposal of solid waste? ~Yes ,~No a. Ii yes, what i~ d~e anticipated rateof disposal? , ~onslmonth, b If yes, what i~ ~he anhc:pa~ed ~le hfe~ ~ _ ,ears. lg, Wdl project use herb:odes or pe~(icidest ~Yes o 19 WHI i'.,rojec! rouuneiy produce odors (more th.*n one hour per day]? ~Y:~s 20 Wdl project produc~: oper&hn~ no:~e exceeding the (o~] ambient noise lev~lsf ~Ye~ ,' x ~,le,-t r~c~ t v, heat in, 'o] 1 24 Does project mvol,.e Local. 5:ate or Federai fundm~ ~Yes ~t 1es. explain -- gailon~,;m~nu~e. **(existing facility - no inorease needed) ' ~15. Approvals Required: C~t¥, Town, 'Vdlage Board Cra/. Town, Vdlage Pianmng Board ~- 'es ~No City. fown Zonm~ Board ~'ei ~No City. County Heaith Department ~'¢~ ~NO Other Local Agencies Other Regional A~enc~e~ ~Yes State A~eec~es ~¥e~ ~No Federal A;enc~es ~Yes 0. Zoning nnd Planning Information Type Site Plat] Approval Sanitary System UFc3rade N.Y,S,D.E.C. Art, 25 Submittal Dale 0/88 Does proposed action revolve a planning or znn,nlil decision? (4~Ye$ ENo If Yes, indicate decision required [~:,on,ng amendment ~zonmg variance ~special use permit ~subdw~s,on ~site plan What ~$ the zonm~ clas~,hca~onCs)ot What i~ th~ max,mum po~enual developmen~ of the s~te ~f developed a~ petmg~ed by the pte~ent zonm~t Pending 10/88 4 What is the p~oposcd zomng of the sitet ,'.N! $. What is the maximum putennal developm~n~ oi [he site if developed as permitted by the proposed Narina b. Is the proposed action ,~onslstent w,th the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? es ~No 7 What are the predormnan[ land users) and zoning dassntcatlo~s within a % rode ~adlu~ of proposed actiont ~iSt. ing CC~c~al develo~nt north, east & west; residential develop~nt south 8. Is the proposed achun compauble with adloming/surroundinii land uses within a '4 toilet es ENo 9. It the proposed acnon is the subdwision of land, how many lots are proposed? n/a a What is [he m~nimum lot size proposed? 10, Wdl proposed action reqmre any au[horization(~l for tl~e formation of sewer or water dJ~tricts~ ~Yes ~No Will the proposed ach, on C~ea~a demand tot any fi,e protecho~jt ~Ye~ ~No community provided services {recreation, education, poiJce, a. If yes, ~s existm~ ca~aci v sufficient [o h~ndle projected demand~ ~Yes ~No 12 WHI the proposed acllon result in the generation of traffic significandy above present Jevelst ~Yes ~o a, If ~,es, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional [raffic~ ~Yes ~No O. informational Oelalls Attach any additional lain[matron as may be needed to clarify your project t[ there are or may be any adverse ~mpac~ associated with ~oa[ proposal, please discus5 such uqpacts and the measures which you propose to mmga/e or avoid them - E. Verification I cer~ifv that the mtOrrnahon provided above ~s true to the best of my knowledge' ApplicanttSpa~i~r Name Tanya Lac.;enmeyer/f_~nd U~e Co~n,, for Vii' Marin~ .... Il the action is in lhe Coaslal Asea, and -ou a~e ...... r .... -~ r a ,,.to agent), complete the Colslal Aiaessment Fo~m beiote Proceedin~ with thi~ a~sellmenl. - 5 " P~t 2--PROJECT ~;'IP~CTS AND THEI~ ~,~AGNITUDE ~espons~illty o~ Lead A~ency General Info~matio~ (Re~d C~re~ul[v) · In compleun~ ~he term the rev,ewer shuuld be~u~ded by the quesuan tJavemy response~ and determmahons been red,enabler The f~viewef IS ROt e~pected to be an exper~ enwronmental analyst. · Identifyin~ that an ~mpacJ w,H be potentially ~arge (column 2J doe~ not mean that ~[ ~s also necessarily tignHiclnt, Any I~rBe ur, pact mu~t be archi=led m PART 3 to de[ermine significance. Idantii?m~ an impact m column 2 smlply asks that it be looked ¢l iuHher · The Examples pro~ded ale ~o assist ~he ,e~e~svr by ~h~mg ~ypes of m~pacts and wherever ~osstble the threshold of ma[mtude that would tf~er a ~espoose in column 2 The examples are gen~r¢lly apphcable ~hroughout the Stale and fo~ most s,tuabons guL ?or any specify; p~olect of site other examples and/or lower !hres~olds m~y b~ appropriate foe a Potenual La[~e Impact ?espcnse, thus eequmn~ evaJuahon m Part 3 · The .npar[s of each [~rolecL on each ~(e. ,n each locality, will v4ry. fhetetare, the ex~mp~es are dlu~UatlVe and have been offered as crud;mca They do not con,illume an eehausu~e hst of imp¢ct$ and ~hr~sho~ds [o answer each question · The number of example~ per question does not mdi(a~e the importance of each queshon · In ~den[l~y,n~ ~mpacts, consider Ion~ term. shall term and cumla~lve e[fe¢ts Instructions {Re~d carefully) c. f¢ answenn~ Yes Io a quest,on then ch~ck the appropriate bo~ (column ! or 2) to ,ad,cctv the potential size of d~e impact. If impact lhreshold equals c~r e~ceed~ any e~amp!e prowded, check column 2 If m~pac[ will occur but threshold ts lower than e~ampJe, check column 1 d I~ reviewer has doub~ about ~ze o~ the impac[ ~hefl contidet the m~pact a~ potenttally torte and proceed to PART 3 e. If a potentially large m~pact ch~cked m ¢olumn Z can be n t sated by chans~s) in [he prelect to a small to moderate ~mpact, also check ~he ~es Oox in coiumn ~ A NO response md~cates that such a reduction ~s hal possible, fhis mu~t be explained in Part 3 hMPAC? ON LAND I ENO E~Y£S [xample~l that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per foot of length), or where the general slopes in Ihe project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land wh~re the depth to the water table is less than 3 Jeer · Construcbon of paved i;arkm~ area tar 1,~ or more vehicles. · Cocs:tuction on land where bedfoc~ is exposed at ~eneraily within 3 feet of existing ground sur/ace · Construchon that will condnue far more than 1 vear or involve more titan one pha~e o~ sta~e. ~ [~cavation [o[ mmm~ pu~pose~ lhal would remove mo~e lhan 1,C~ tons of nato[al ma[e~al (~ e., rock o~ sod] per · Conslruct[on in a des~nat~d floodway · Olh~r mlpact~ Will the propo~ed acbcn result m a physical chancre to the prelect slte~' I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigaled 8y Impact Impact Project Change ~3 ~ ©yes ~JNo 12 [] []]yes ~ ~ CYes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves 6 '~¥iJJ there be an effect to any umque or unusual land forms found on the stte? (i.e., clltfs, dunes, [¢eolosical formations, otc · Specihc land forms IMPACT ON WATER Will proposed .~cuon .~tfect any w,~ter body des,gnated as protected? ~NO Examples that would ~ppty ~o column 2 Developable a~ea of sde centares a protected water body Dredimg mo~e than 1~) cubic ~d~ of mater~] from channel of a protected stream Extension of utd~ty distribution t~ciii[ie~ through, protected water body Construction m ~ des~nat~d Other ~mpacts. Wdl proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease m the surface af~a of any body of water Construction of a body ol wa[e~ Ihat e~ceeds i0 ~c~es of ~urface area Other impacts: Wdl Proposed Action ~.ifect surface or groundwater quality or quantmtyt ~,NO ~.Y£S I:xamples that would apply t~ c~umn ~ Proposed Action will require a discharge perm,[ Proposed Action requires u~e of a source Oi water :h~t does not have approval to ~erve p~opo~ed (project) achon Proposed Action requlre~ water ~upplv ~tom weJJl wi~h ~rea~et than 45 gallons pe~ minute pumping capacity supply system Proposed Acl~on wdJ ad~erse!y a~fect groundwater Liquid effluent will be conveyed ofl Jhe site ~o facilities which presendy do not ex~st or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would u~e wa~et m e~cess o~ 20.(A~ gaJJont pet day, Proposed AcUon will hkeJ./ cause siJ~aJlon or other d~schat~e ~nto an ex,s~m~ body of wa~e~ to ~he extent ~ha~ there wlJJ be an obvious wsuaJ COnt~as~ to naJuraJ conditions Proposed A~tlon will require the ~tora~e of peltoleum or chemical product~ grealer than 1,1~ gallons Proposed Action wdl allow residential uses In areas w,~houl water facilities Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? Fl, NO EE]YE S E~amples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows 7 I 2 I 3 Small lo PotentialJ Can Impact Be Moderate Lar,;e I Mitigated By Impact Impact IProject Change m, O i ~Ye~ F-]No ~ L~! ~ y es ~ N o ~Yet ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ m ~ m ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~ves ~no ~ ~ m ~es ~ ~ ~Ves 0 0 ~Yes Oho Will proposed ¢ci~on .,?~ct a;r ,';uai*ty," I~NO ~'¥[S [~ample~ th_~ ~}uld aPPU io coiumn 2 hour refu~e per hour iMPACT ON PL~.'NTS AND ,~N~MALS Will Proposed ~,=-[~,.~', ,~tie~.t _ny th~uetun~d ~ en(!angeted ~pecle~ ~NO ~Y~S [xample~ ¢.at wa. id ~pply ~o cutumn 2 Reduction of ane or more sp~C~eS i~sted on 'he ~4ew York or Federal Removal of any per.on of .~ crmcai ur *~nmcant wdd]lfe habflat. Other ~mpact~ mm-endangered species? ~NO [xampl~ that ~ouid apply t~ column 2 Proposed Act.2n wou~d substantially IMPACt ON AGRiCULTUrAL ~ND n=souac~s land (mclude~ (toplan~, havhe~dx pa~ure, wnevard, orchard, e~c 1 Small to Moderate Impact r2 m [] 2 Polenlial Large impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Oroject Cl~ange i-~ Yes L~NO ?Yes ?lNg ~Yes ~No ~Ves ~o ~¥es ~No .?a~Yes E3¥es F2Yes ~No ~¥e~ ~¥es ~No ~Yes []No [Z]~es ~No ~Yes E]No alcricultural land. of agricultural land or, ff located m an:^~ricuhu,~,d D~stnct, more than 2 5 acres of dgricultural land ; ~ land ma~asement sy*tem~ (e ~. ~ub~urtace dram hnes, outlet ditches, held to dram poorly due [o increased runoit) Other impacts IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed achon aflect aesihetic resource~d ~NO ~,'~E$ {If necessary, use the V~u~d EAF Addendum m Secuon 61721. Appendix ~ ) * Other ~mpac~s: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND A~CHAEOLO(IlCAL RESOURCES 12. Wdl Proposed ^ction impact any s~te or s~ructure el~ h~storic, pre- historic or paleontological ~mportance~ ~NO ~YES E~ample~ that would apply ~o column 2 · Proposed Actron o~currmg wholly or part~all~ within or substan[,aily contiguous (o any facih~y Or s,t~ h~(ed on the SIa~e or National Re~,~ter of h~to~c places · Any m~pact to an archaeological site or fossd b~d located wi[biff the project · Proposed A~hon archaeological s;tes on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other 13 Wdl ?reposed Acbon ~tiect th~ quan(~ty ar quality of ex~sUn~ ar [~amples ~ha[ would apply to column 2 ~NO ~YES · Other ,mpacts g 1 2 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact tProject Change -- ',.-J ~ es ~NO ~ ~ ~Ves ~No D ves ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~MPAC" ON that would :,.ppi,, to co!utah 2 · Proposed Achon wall femoYe natural bamer~ thai would act a~ a · O~her impacts_ IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH Wall Proposed Action affect public ,healhh J, nd ~,alety? ENO [:Ampl~s lh~t would al}Ply ~o column 2 r~ Can Impact Be Praiect Change -..'~es ~,Yes []]No E]'.','es F'INo ~Yc, s ~No ~Yes []] ¥ al []]NO ~Yes ~No ~Yes F-1ye~ r'SNo 10 !MPACT ON GROWTH AND CHAGIACTER OF COMI~.UJ',tlTY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Wiii proposed action attec'.th~ character of the ex~st,n~j commumtv~ [ZNO [~amples tha~ wou~d apply to column 2 The permanent popu!abon of the c~ty, ~own ot viHa~ h~ which the projec[ ~s located The mumctpa~ budget ~or cap,iai expendm~te~ or operatm~ serwces wall ,ncrease by more ~han s% per year as a result of khis project Proposed actm:l ,~iJJ conflict with oific~aHy ~dop~ed p~ans or goals. Proposed action w)l[ c~u~¢ ack. an~e m the denfl~y 0t I)nd use or a~eas of historic ~mporL~nce to the commundy Development wdl create a dema,qd for additional community services (e.~. schools, police and hre, etc) Proposed Action w~Jl Proposed Action wdl create or M~mm~te employment. Other impac[~ 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can I,"nl~.~¢! Be Moderate Large Mliigatad By Impaci impact Projecl C~ange L~ ~ ~ves ~ E EYes ENo I is Ihe?e. or ~s there hkM¥ to be, pubhc controversy related to pz,~ent~¢l ad~,~r*.e em,~ronmer, tal m~pactsf ~NO !! You Cannot Determine the ;~ag,~ltud~ of impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALgATION OF THE IMPORTANCF.. OF fNIPACTS Responsibility el Lead A~ency Pa~I 3 must be p~epar~d il one or more impacl(s) is considered to be p~tentially large, even if Ihe impaci(s} may be miliBated. In~ttuction~ Di~c~s~ the following f~r each m3p~ct Me,tdied i~ Cotumn 2 of Part 2: 1 Briefly describe the ~mpac[ 2 Describe[d appH~able) how ~he m~pact could be mmgatod o~ reduced to a 3 Ba~ed on the infcrmat~cn avadable, duc~c ff ~[ ~ r~a~ondbJe to ~oncJude dlat t~e5 ,~pact is impo~tanL To answer the question of ~mporta~ce. consider. · The p~obab~l~t,v of the impact · The duratson of the ~ I~s Irt~v~Mbd~w. mcludm~ permanent y J~s~ resourCeS et value · Whether ~he ray, act can et will be cont~olJed · The r~t~naJ consequence of tSe impact · I~s potenuM di~er,~ence from ~bcal needs and · ~hcther k ,awn objections to :he f)~oiec[ r~,late to th~s .npac~ (Continue on atlachmen~s) 11 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 October 2, 1991 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of Long Environmental Assessment Form for Village Marine, E/S Bay Avenue, 140' S/O SR 25, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-122-3-15.1 Dear Mr. Cramer: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Long Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned site plan to your office for review. Please develop an estimate of what it Will cost to undertake the review. Enter the cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send its facsimile to this office. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Encls. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. / '' -~ Chairman Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: EAF Review SCTM9 1000- Dear Mr. Orlowski, Jr., It is estimated that the cost of reviewing the above-noted application as per your letter of 1991 should not exceed $ ' No work in excess of that amount will be undertaken by this office unless so authorized by the Planning Board in writing. Please notify this office in writing if you wish us to undertake the review. Very truly yours, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates 617.21 Appendix A SEQR Stale Environmental Quality Reviow FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full LAF ~s designed to help applicants and agencies deform,ne, m an orderly manner, wheH~er a or achon may be s~gmi~cant The ques[ion o~ whe[her an achan may be ~igAlfJcant rs not always ea~v to an~wer Frequent. ly, ~here are aspects, of a pt~;ect thai ~re subjectwe ot unmeasureab~e It is also unde~staod tha~ those who determine ~ignificance may have litde or no formai knowledge of the environment r;r may be technically expert j~ enwronmen[al analysis In addition, many who have k~ow[ed~e ,n o~e Pamcuiar area may not be awa~e of the broader concerns a~fecdn~ the que~hon ot The full EAF ~s re[ended to provide a method whereby appiican~ and cgencies can be assured that the determmahon process ha~ bee~ orderly, compreben~v,e m nature, yet ilex~bJe to allow introduction ct mformahon ~o fit ~ proiect er act,on Full EAF Components: The tull EAF ~s comprised oi three pa*~: PA~i 1; Provides objectwe dat~ a~d information about a g~ven project and it~ site, By ~dent~ying basic dale, ~t ass~s{s a rewewer m ~he analysis [ha~ takes place i~ Parts 2 and J Pall 3: If any ~mpac~ in Par{ 2 ~ ~den~if~ed as potentially-large, then Part ] ~s used to evaluate whethe~ or no~ DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlb;ted Actions Identify thePorlions ol EAF eompleled for ibis proiec/: 1~ Part 1 ~ Part 2 ~Part 3 Upon rewew of the ;nfom~a~,on recorded on th~s EAF [Part~ 1 and 2 and 3 if appropr ate), and any o~her supporting i~formaliofl, and considering both the mag~ude and importance ol each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency ~flat A The project wdl nut result m dfly large ~nd :mportant impact, s) and, therefore, ~s one which ~il! have a s*gnif~canl imp~c~ on the enw~oflment, therefore a negalJve declar~lion will be prepared. B. Although the Project could have a s,~mticant effect on the environment, there wdl not be a effect for th~ Unlisted Action becduse the mmgation measures described m PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declar~lion will be prepared.' C The project may resull m one or more large dnd important impacts that may have a signdicdnt on the environment, [hetelore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Condilloned Negative Declaration Is only valid for Unhsted Name of Action Name of Lead Agency ~ ~ Print or Type Name of Re'.gonsible Officer in Lead Agency T,tle of Responsible Officer S~gnature of Responsible Ofhc?r in Lead Agency Signature o[ Pre~ser (If-ddferent fr~ 9/30/9] Date _J PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE. Thi~ document ~ designed to assist ~n determming whether the action proposed may have a s~gr~ificant effect on the enwronment Please complete the enhre form. Parts A throuph [ Answers to ~hese questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subiect to iurther verification and pubhc review. Provide any additional [nfom~at~on you b~heve ~dl be n~eded to complete P~rts 2 and 3. h is expected that completion ot the tull ~AF wHi be dependent on info~mat~o~ currenHy available and w~H not revolve new s~die~, research or mve~[l~at[on It reformation tequirm~ ~uCh additional work ,s unavailable, so indicate and e~ch m~tance NAME OF ACTION Prcp_osed Marine Repair/Stora.ge Butldin~ 175 Bay Village Marine (516 ~ 298r5800 ADDR[6S P.O. Box 1045 STATE ! ZiP CODE c[tY~O Mattituck, N.Y. ~952 PLEASE SEE ~TTn~H~D PROJECT DESCRIPTION Please Complete Each Quettion- indicate N.A. if not appticable A. Site Description Physical setting o~ overatl project, both developed an,~/undeveloped areas 1 Present land use: [3Urban Fllndustrial ,fi~Commercial I~Residentiat (suburban) ~Forest ~Agriculture ~Other 2 Total acreage of prolect are,~ .54 acres APPROXIMATE A£REAG~ Meadow or Brushland (Non-apricuhural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, :25 o~ ECL) Water Surface Area - ' Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill] Roads, buddmg~ and other paved surfaces Other[Ind~ca~e type]o~av°l [~at Storaqe/~k[sq ~ea ~Rural (non-farm 3, What is predominant soft, type(s)on project s,te? Rd R lverhead Sandy Loam a Soil dra:nage ~Well drained 100 % ot; s~te [3Moderately well drained % of site ~?oorly drained % of site b If any agricultural land ~s involved, how many acres ot soil are classif,ed w~rh,n ~o,} group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Ciassdicanon SyHem~ acres (See I NYCRR 4. Are there bedrock outctoppin&s on project site~ ~Yes a. What is depth to bedrock~ _ 600+ ' (in feet] 2 0 PR£SENTLY AFTER~:OMPLETION O acres Q acres 0 acres 0 acres O acres Q acre~ O acre~ 0 acre~ · 14 ___ acre~ . 19 . acres .40 acres , 35 acres PROJECT DESCRIPTION - VILLAGE MARINE Applicant propoges to remove existing 25'x 36' metal building and construct a 40'x 60' boat repair and storage building. Proposed building location is 28.6' landward of the existing bulkhead and requires a 46.4' variance to the regulated 75' setback. Additionally, applicant proposes to pave, with asphalt, a 595 s.f. area landward of the existing bulkhead. As mitigation, applicant will install drainage pools to contain stormwater runoff. '5 Approximate percentage of proposed pro~eCt ~du with s~opes; r~.lO% ~] O0 % ~1615% -- % ~15% or ~rea~er ' 6, Is pro~ec~ subs[anhaHy com~guous [o, ~ building, ~, or dismct, Jis~ed on the State or th? National Re~,~ter~ of H~stonc Placesf ~Ye~ o 7. Is Proiec~ subs~anti~Hy con[i~uou~ to a s~t~ i~ted on the Re~ster of National Natural Landmarks~ ~Yes 8 What ~s the depth of ~h~ water table? 0'-8' (in feetj 9. Is site located ever a p~imary, pfmc~pal, or sole souice aquifer? ~Ye~ ~No 10 DO hunt,n~, flshm~ or shell ~i~hm; opportum[~es presendy ex,st mn Ihe proiec~ are~? ~Yes "~No 11 Does pro!eCl s~t~ contam any s?ecies of piant or ammal I~fe ~ha[ i~ ~denhfled as ~hreaten~ or endangeredl Ac~ord,n~ to ~te~d ~nspec[~on · 12. Are there any umque or unusual land Iorms on the project s~e? [~.e. cliffs, dunes, o~het ~eolo¢~cai Descr~b~ 13 Is the project sH~oresently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area.' L2Ye~ ~"No I[ yes, expi~m 14 Dee~ the present~e include ~cemc wews k~Own to be m]portant to ~he commumtyl ~o 15 Streams wmthm or conn~uous to proiect area 5ames Creek 16. Lakes, ponds, wetJ,~J~d ar,;.~s wRhm or conH~uous to project area: ¢ Name b Size {in acres) 17 I~ the slte served by exJ~un;~ public u~iiit~es? ~¢es ~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capac~t~ e~ 1o aiJow connection? ~Yes ~No b] If Yes, wdl ~mprovement¢ be necessary lo allow connection? ~Yes ~No (~anston o~ ~xistlng use) 18 Is the ~ite located m an agricdltur~l/dlStflC~ cetU¢led pursuant to 'As¢icuhufe and Markets Eaw, Article 25-AA. Section 303 and JO4? ~Yes ~No 19. Is ~he site located mo¢ substafRiall~ont~uobs ~o a Cridcal ~nvironmental Area des,~na~ed pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR b'17t ~Yes ~No (~r~bu~ary to Peeon~c Bay) 20. Has the site ev¢r been used for the disposal of sol~d or hazardous wastes? ~Yes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensmns and scale of project (fill m dimensions as appropriate) a Total con/,t~uous acreage owned or cnnt~oil~d b~ ~roiect sponsor .54 b Project acreage to be developed: 05 acres mltially; ,, · 05 c. Project acreage [o remora undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles; , n/a (If appr0pnate) e H the project I~ an e~pansmon, indicate percent of expansion proposed _~ 8. Maximum vehicular tnp~ ~enerated per hour ~ 8 On~ Famdy Two Family Multiple Family Imdally Ultimately ~ D~mens~ons (m feet) of la~est proposed structure * hu,~ht; 60' width, 40 ' . lenlth J Linear feet of frontase alon~ a pubh~ thorou~hfafe project will occupy is~ · [ess Chart 35' 3 ; proposed 1 0 (upon completion of project)? Condominium 3, ~/IJJ d~sturbed areas be reclaimed? L~¥es ~No ,~N/A ,~ Ii ~. for wh~ intended purposu is ~hL' ~Re beths redaimed~ L-]Ye~ __ tons!,,Jub~c yards __ jr:umber} mo,:ths {:ncludi,g demot!tiofl) month ~Yes [~No year, hrl¢ludsng d~-molibon] veal ~Yes o If yes, explain muJu ph;t~d n/a ApprOximate completion dale et JmaJ p~ase I~ phase i ~unchonally d~.p~ndem on subsequ~n~ phases? 0 ' - ' ¢ .... d, '-" ~ ' f~ 14 Will ~urface area oJ an ex,snng water body increase or decrease by proposal{ ~Yes ~No Explain 15 i~ prelect ~r ~n~ p;~mon oi proi~c~ icon,ed ~a ;i I(~ year flo~d plain? · 16. Wdl the prop<t generate solid waste? . ei, o a l[ yes, wh0~ is the amount per modth tons b I[ yes, w~tl an existml mhd wasle {~cdil~ be used? ~Yes ~No T ' ~ho~d, N,Y. c tf yes, g,ye name ~)uthold T~: ..andftll ; location e, Ii Yes. e~pJam 17 W41 the prc~wct throne the d,spos,:i oJ sohd waste? ~Yes o a. If ~es. what ~ tile anticipated rzte~of disposaU _. tons/month ltl ~qll project use hefb~odes or pe~tlcldes? ~Yes lq Wrll project touUnely produce odors (more th~n one hour per (Jay)? ~¥.s 20 21 W4I ¢,rolect p~odu;e oper?.::n$ nol.~e e,u. eedir,¢, t. he local ambient nol~,e levels? yeS, h;dlc4te t¥;a.tsi ,rlect;ricJtv, heaCin,~/o'~l 23 Tot,ii anz;clpated '.~ate[ usage pet day gallons/day Ii ~es, __ g,,HIc, ns/m,nu~e, ** (exist in9 fao/l it}, - no increase needed) ' '~S. Approvals Required: City, Town. Vdla~,e Board C~ty, Town. Vdlage Planning ~3oard ~,,~ies ~No City, Town Zonln~ Board City, County Health gepa~[ment O[he~ Local A~encms Other Regional A~encle~ ~Yes ~o State A~enctes ~¥e~ ~No Federal A~enc~es C. Zoning and Planning Information fype Site Platl Approval Sanitary System Upgrade N.Y.S.D.E.C. Art. 25 ~;ubmillal Dale Pending 1 Does proposed achon revolve a plannm~ or Zomng dec~siofl? ~{~/'Yes []]No i[ Yes, indicate decision cequ~ted ' ~ZOnmg amendment ~zo~li~ v~riance ~s~eciaJ u~e permit ~ubdiws~on ~site pla~ 2 What b the zomn~ c]a~i~cauon(~)ot the ~[e~ 3 What i~ th~ maxm~,;m po[enbat deveiopmen= of the st[e If developed ~s permKted by the present Zomng? ~rina lO/S8 4 What is the p~oposed zomni~ of S. What is the maxm~u~r~ potennaJ developm~.nt o[ the site ~f developed as permitted by the proposed Zomng? Na~ina 6, Is the proposed act,on consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? /6qYes [3No ? What ate the predommant land users) and zonmg ' , 'r ~ist, ing cC~rc~al deVelo~nt north, e~st & west; residential deve]o~nt south 8. Is the proposed achon compahbJe ;vJth adio~nin~sutfoundin~ land uses within a '~ mdc1 es ~No 9. I~ the proposed acnon ~ ~he s~bdwision o~ land, how many lots a~e propo~edl n/a a What is [he mmimum Jot size p~oposedt 10. Wdl p~oposed action requ~Fe a~y authouzation(sj for ~t~e formation of sewe~ 11 Will ~he p~oposed ac[i, on c~ea~a demand fi,e protectioq)? ~es ~No any community provided services (recreation, educat on police. a. If yes, is existm~ capacit,/sutfJcient to handle p~oiected demand? ~Yes 12. W~II the proposed act,on result in the generation oi traffic si~mficandy above p~esent Jevels1 ~Yes ~o a, If ~reS, I~ the ex~shng road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes ~No D. Informational Dotall~ Attach any additional in~ormabon as may J~e needed [o clarify your p~oject I~ there a~e or may be any adverse ~mpac[5 associated with ~our proposal, please d~scu55 such u~pacts and the measute~ which you p~opose to mmgate or avoid them E. Verlllcallon .ert~,¥ that th~ mtorrnahon p~o¥~ded abo,.,e ~s true to the be~t ot my knowledge.. Applicant/Si~;~r Name Tanya Lachen~yer~nd Use Co~ny for VillageMarine the action is in the C0~Hal Area, and you ale a ~tate~asenc), complete the CoasiaJ Aiieflmont Form be[ore proceedin~ wilh this ~--et~ment. - 5 " P-~t 2~-PROJ_I~T L~{pt~CTS AND THEIR MAGH~DE ~esponsibilily o~ Lead Agency General Information (Re~d Carefully) · In compleung the term the fewewer shuuld be guided by the ouest~on: Have my respon~c-~ and determinations been p . to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an ,mpac~ w,H he potermaliv ~ar~e (column 2J does not mean ~ha[ ,t ,s also necessarily signilicant. asks that it be looked d[ further · The E~ample~ pro~ded are to assist the ,evie~er b'y sho~m~ types of mmpaos and wherever possible the threshold of magmtudethat wouldtt!~geta responsemcolumn2 The examples, aregener~Jly apphcable:hroughout the State and e The mmpac[s of each prc~jecL ,')n each S,.e, m each iccatib', win v~ry, There are, the ex*inDies are dlu~Uat,ve and have been offered as ~¢Hdi~,qce They do not COnstitute an e[hausuve hst of Impacts arid thresholds to answer each question · The ~lumbef of examples pet ques:Jon does not red,cate the importance of each queshon · In identifying ~mpacts. constde~ long term. shotl term and cumlat~ve effects Instruclions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of ~he t9 qLIe~liOn~ in PART 2 Ar, swef ?e~ If there wdi be any impact b Maybe answers ~ho~;d be considered as ?ts answers. c. I~ answetm~ Yes to a quest,On then check the appropriate box(co!utah 1 or 2}to mdJc~t~, the potential size of the ~mpact If impact threshold equals o~ e~ceed~ ~ny example ~fov~ded, c'Eu~k column 2 If impact will ~ccur but :hre~ho~d is [owe~ than e~amp e, check cu!umn 1 d If reviewer h~s doubt oboe: ~;ze el the impact lhen con~det the smpact a~ poter~t~aJly iar~e and proceed (0 PART 3 e. If a po{entlaJiy large .'npact ch~-cke;] m column ] can be m:tigated by chang~) in the prelect to a small to moderate ~mpact, also check ~he Yes Pox in Column J A NO response indicates that such a ~eductiOn ~s not possible. This must be e~plamed m PArl ~ IMPACT ON LAND Will ;.he proposed act~en result m a l}hyslcal £~,anwe [o the prelect slier [xamples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot ri~e pet l~ foot of length), or where Ihe general ~topes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where Ihe depth to the wa~er table is less than 3 lret Construcbon of paved packing area Jot 1,~} or ~ote vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock ~s exposed or ~eneraily w~thin 3 feet of existing ~round surtace. Construcbon that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stare. Excavation Jot rmmng purposes Jhal would remove mo;e than 1,~ tons of natural ma[eual [~ e., rocL or sod) per year Construction or ~xpans;on of a s~mtary landfill ConHrucbon m a desm~nated floodway Other unpacts ~ 2 Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the sltet (i.e., cliffs, dune,., I~eOlo~ical iormahons, etc · Specific land forms 1 2 3 Small to PotontiaI Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated Impact Impact Pcoioct Change [] E3 Eiy'es ['~o [] 13 ~yes fiJNo ~] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ Wes ~No ~ ~ Wes ~ ~ ~ves ~No IMPACT ON WATER Will proposed action affect any w,~[er body des,gnated as protected/ [L, ndet .Art,des 15.24. 2~ ut the Envuonmenla~ Conservation Law. ECL) ~Y~S [~mples ~hal ~ould dpply ko column 2 Developable a~a oi site centam~ a pto~ected w~er Dredging mote than ~) cubic ~a~d~ of material ~n3m channel protected ~tream Cofl~uuc[Jon m ~ des~nated freshwater or tidal Other impacls: Will proposed action aifect any non-protected e~isting or new body of wateri' L~NO E3YES £xampies that would ,*pply to column 2 Construction of a body ~ wa[et ih,it e~ceeds ~0 ~ctes of ~urface area Other ~mpacts: Wdl Proposed Actmn affect ~utface ot groundwater quahty et quant~tyt E~NO ~2Y£S Examples that would appiy [~ Column 2 Proposed Action will r~qu~re a discha[ge petm,t Proposed Action require~ u~e of a ~outce ot water th4t does not have apptovM to ~erve proposed (project) acbo,~ gallons per minute pumping capacity supply system P~oposed Ac/IOft wdl adYersely affect groundwater Liquid effluent w~ll be conve~ed off the site to facdRies wh,ch presently do not ex~st or have inadequate capacity Proposed Action would u~e water m excess et 20.1~ aallon~ per day. Proposed Action wdl hkeJy cause siJtatto~ or other d,~chAt~e rote an ex,stm~ body o~ water to tho ex[e~ that there will be afl obvious v~sua] Proposed Action will tequ.e the ~[ota~e of petroleum or chemical produc/~ greater than 1,1~ gallons Proposed Action will allow residential u~e~ tn atea~ w*thout water facilities 6 Wdl proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? I-INO E3YES Examp!e~ that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows ? I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Moderato L3rge Mitigated 8y Impact Impact Project Chan~e ~ '~ { L~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~NO ~ ~ ~ves ~no ~ ~ ~Yes ~NO I..'-APACT ON PL/,NT8 /-,NO Ai'~MAL~ V¢ill P{opo~d ;~ch,.n ,~le~ ~r,y tb~e~t~-aed Ot e.~c!.~n~e~ed ~NO ~Y~S Removal ct any pon;on Application gl pesticide gl hurb,c~de more [han h, vice a year, other than for ~gncuhutaJ purposes Other ~mpacl~: non-endangered species? ~NO Example~ that would apply to column 2 m~g~alory h~h, sheJli~h or ~wldhfe or ma[ute fo~c.,t (o~,ur lr~J i,,~rs Of a~el or ,~the: !ccaliy important IMPAC~ ON AGRiCULTUrAL ~ND ~NO [~Y[ S land (include~ cropland, hayi~eid~, pa~!ufe, wneva[d, orchard, eJc ) 1 2 amall to Polanlial Modorale Largo Impact impact r'~] F2 3 Can Impact 30 Mitigated By Project Change , l~Yes ~:~o C2¥es L3NO r-INo {~Yes Lm~NO [] Ye:; ~Yes ~qNo [~Yes f~No [..~ Yes ling Con>truer,on actiw~y would e,cavate or compacI the soil profde ot a~ricultural land The. proposed action wou[d ilfevotJib[7 co~w~rt more lh~h I0 acres than 2 5 acres o[ a~ricultural land land mahagement ~ystems (e g. ~ubsudace dram hnes, oudet ditches, held to dr~m poorJy due to increased runof/~ Other impac(s: 11 Will proposed dchon affect aesthetic resources? F~NO (If necessary, u~e the V~)u,~l IA[ Addendum .n Secbon 617 21. Appendix 8 ] [=~mple~ lha: wuuld ~pply [o column 2 Proposed land uses. ~r pro]-~t ~omponen[~ u~.wousJy dfft~rent from Proposed land uses. or pro~ect componenls visible to enjoyment of :he aestlJe~c qu~h~i~ of thai Other IMPACT ON HIS'tOfllC 'AND ARCHAEOLOOdOAL RESOURCES 12. wdl Proposed Aclion impact any s,te of stcuctu:e ol~ h~$toric, pre- hisloric or paleontotosical ~mportance? L~NO E~ample~ thai would apply to column 2 * Proposed Action OC~urnng wholly or partially within or substafl[~aliy coflti~Qlous (o any facihW or 5it~ h~[ed on the State or National of h~stollc places ~ Any m~pact ~o ~n a~ch.eolog~cai site or fossd bed located within prolec/ site . Proposed Achon will occu~ in an area des,gnated as sen~;tive lot a~chaeolo~mcal sites on the NY5 Site Invelltory. - Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPE~ SPACE AND R[.CRE. ATION 13 Wdl Proposed Act,on ~[iect the quant~ly or quaii~y ot ex~sUn¢ ~r luture open spaces or recreabon~l OpportumHe~ cxamp es thai ~ould apply ~o column 2 ~NO ~YES The permanent foreclosure ola future lec[eational oppoHuniW, Other ~mpacts 1 2 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change I' ~ ~ ~Yes ~NO I ~ [ ~ OYes ~ ~ Wes ~o ~ ~ ~Yes ~No Proposed Achon w,il remove natural bamer~ .hat would act as a nai~e screen. O~her impacts_ IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Vvlll Fropo,~ed Action affect public health and QNO [~mpl~ th~/ would apply ~o coh~mn 2 · Proposed AcbO,~ may cause a r~sk of explosion o~ release of hazardou~ sa~stancns [ie o~1, peri,odes, chemicals, rad~atmn, etc ] Iff the event of 1 Small to Moderate h'np~ct ,,.-, Potential C~n Impact Be Largt) J Mitigated fay tm. p.,'nct j Project Change I ~ ~Ye~ ~No c~:~ ~Yes ~No 10 iMPAC? ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD WiiJ proposed action affect the character oi the ex~stin,,.,j community;' ~NO E~YES [xamplei that would apply to column 2 The permanent populal~oq of ~he cKv, ~own et vitiate [~ which the project ~ Ioc~ed i~ t~kelv [o crow by more th~ The mumc~p~! budget tar capital expenditure~ or operetta8 serwces Proposed act:on '~iJJ co~ilc[ with g~ficUlHy -~dopLed plans or ~oais. Proposed act;on wdJ c~u~ ~ ck, an~ m the den$;[y or a/oas of historic ~mporJ~nue to th~ commun.ly Development w~JJ cre3~e a demand for additional com~{~ity (e.8. schools, police and fife, Proposed Act,on wdl s~t an ~mportan( p[~ceden~ for future prolec~s Proposed Act:on w,Jl crea~e or chromate employment Other impacts 2 3 Small to Polential Can I~pac! Re Moderate Lsrge Mltigntad By Impact Impact Projecl Change r2 ~ NO ~ ~I ~Yes 1 is ~!;ere, or ~s the:e hkel¥ to be, pubhc controversy related to po~unbai adverse en',,ronm~.ntaJ impacts~ ,re. NO You Cannot Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE hMPORTANCE OF t PACT8 Relpon~ibilily oj Lead A~ency Pa~t 3 mull be prepared il one or more impact(~) is considered to be potentially large, e~en if the impact(s} may be millgated. I Instructions Discuss the following for each impact ide~tdiud in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 Briefly describe the ~mpacl ~ 2 Descnbe(d applicable) how Ihe m~pact could be mm~ated o~ ~educed ~o a ~mal[ tomoderate m~pact by project chana~s) 3 Based on the iniofm~hon available, deode ff ~[ ~ reasonable to conclude tllat th~5 ~mpact is important. ~o answer the question nj ~mporta~ce, consider, · The p[obabHit~ nj the impact ?ccurrma · The durabon of the impac[ · Irs Jtteve~sib,J~ty, incJ~din~ permanendy Jest resources nj value · Wh~-~he~ lhe m~pacl can o~ will be con~roJJed · the [e~lofl,ll consequence nj the impacl · hs potential d~e~enc~ hem J~cal needs and ~oaJs · Whether known objections to ~he pzoiecl relate to this Impact PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 1, 1991 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 David Young village Marine P.O. Box 1045 Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Amendment to Site Plan for Village Marine, E/S Bay Avenue, 140' S/O SR 25, Mattituck SCTM~1000-122-3-15.1 Dear Mr. Young: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, September 30, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Planning Board hereby starts the lead agency coordination process on this Type I action subject to receipt of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Be~t Orlowski, Jr. ' '~ chairman The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of ~he date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (~ This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. (~. Comments: Please feel free to contact this office cc:v/Board of Appeals~ ~'Board of Trustees~ v~Building'Department~. ~Southold Town Board ~Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services,., ~/NYSDEC - Stony Brook-- v~NYSDEC - Albany% S.C. Dept. of Public Works U.S. Army Corp of Engineers N.Y.S. Dept. of Transportation * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 ~ ,_,&J/ 19~/ RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: . Your in the action described below; jurisdiction Your interest in assumin~ the responsibilities of lead agency; and Issues of concern which believe should be evaluated. you Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: ~/P~ C~~ /~--/~-- ~ --/~7./ Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: (~) Type I ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: ~J~ (516)-765-f93F PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 1, 1991 SCOWl' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Halk 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 David Young village Marine P.O. Box 1045 Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Amendment to Site Plan for Village Marine, E/S Bay Avenue, 140' S/O SR 25, Mattituck sCTM#1000-122-3-15.1 Dear Mr. Young: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, September 30, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Planning Board hereby starts the lead agency coordination process on this Type I action subject to receipt of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Or±ows~ , / .~ Chairman Land Use DATE; October 1, 1991 FROM: Tanya Lachenmeyer TO: Town of Southold - Planning Department ATTENTION: 5~. Va!erie Scopez TOTAL PAGES: FOR APPROVAL: FOR YOUR USE: AS REQUESTED: FOR REVIEW: APPROVED: RETURNED~ REMARKS: ]3 ~i,,n¢luding this one) x 2576 Sound Avenue · I~ltlng Holiow, New York · 11933 (516) 727-2400 · FAX (516) 727-2605 · 14:1~-2'(2/1~7)-- 7c 617,21 Appendix A SEQR State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The fu;I LAF ~ des~grted to help apphcants and agent;es determ,ne, m an orderly manner whetber a pr~lect or act~on may be ~gmficam ~hequesdono~whether !~, t~rearea~pectsof a project that are~ubjectweanacti°nmaybe~igmficant~sn°talwaysea~ytoan~wer ~requent. or unmeasureable It is also understood tha~ those whodetermme ~gm.cance may have little or ~o formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis In addition, many who ha~.e knowledge m one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns aHecting the question ot ~gm~cance The tull fAF ~s mt~nded to provide a me/hod wheteb~ applicants and ~genc~es can be assured that the determma0on ~rocess ha~ been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexlble to allow mttodL~ctiofl o~ information to fit a prolect or action full ~AF Componenl~: The fuji ~F ~s comprised ot three Part 1; Provides object,ye datd and information about a given pro,eot and its site, ~y ~dentdying basic project data, ~t assists a rewewer m the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and J Pail 2~ lotuses on ~ent~fym& the range oi possible impact~ that may occu~ from a project or achon It ~rovide~ guidance a~ ~o wt~'t her an ~mpact is hkely to be considered small to moderale or whether it large ~mp.ct ~he ~orm aJ~o ~dentifle~ whether an m~pact can be mitigated o~ reduced impact ~ actually ~mpor:ant DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Porlions of fAF compleled tot tht~ project: /~ Part 1 ~ Part 2 L~Part 3 Upon rewew of the reformat,on recorded on tb~s fAF (Pa~t~ 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering bolh the magJtude and importance ol each impact, it i$ reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A The p~o~ect w~JI ~ot result m ~n¥ larg~ ~d :mpoftant impact(s) and, therefore, ~s one which wiU have a s~Kn,f~ca~ ~h~pdC~ O~ :he enw~onment, therefore a negative declatalion will be pre~ared. B. Although the project ~ould hdve a s~mhcam eHect on [he environment, there will not be a effect for thi~ Unlisted Action because the mmgation measures described ,n PA~T ] have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared,' C, The prolect may result m one or mo~e large and important impacts that ma~ ha~e a sism/ic.nt ~mpact on the environment. ~herelore a poihive declaration will be prepared, * A Condihoned Negative Declaration ~s only valid for Unhsted Acuons Name of Lead Agency ~)'rJr~i or Type Name ot Responsible Officer in Lead Agency T~tle of Responsible Officer 5,gnature of Rt'sponsibie Officer in ,~g.ncy $,gnature of Pre~t~er (it d,fferent from respons;b[e~t~/h~.~r 9/30/91 Date ! PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE; This document ~s designed to assist in determ~nmg whether the action proposed may have a s~gnificant effect on theenwronment Please compiete the entire form, Par(sA through E Answers to these quesnons will be considered as part of theapphcationforappr°"alandmaybesubjectt°furthers'erd~cati°nandpubhcreview Pfovideanyaddmonal inforrnauon you beheve wdl be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 It ss expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and wdl not involve hew studies, research or mvest,gation It mlormat~On requiring, such addilional work is unavailable, so indicate and speedy each instance NAME OF ACTION Propg~d Ma~i~.e Repa.ir/Storage Buildin9 175 Bay Avenue, Mattitt~cK, Suffolk NAME OF App~ICANTI~NSOR ADDRESS CITwPO Village Marine P.O. Box 10~5 [ BU$1NE$~ t~c ePHONE (516 ~- 298:5800 . Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 DEgCHI!aTION OF ACTION PLEASE sEE ATTACHED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Please Complele Each Question-indicate N.A, if not applicable A. Site Desoripflon Physical setting of overall project, both developed an,.~/undeveloped I Present land use. ~Urban fi31ndustrial /II, Commercial [~l'oresT f-]Agriculture C1Other 2 Total acreage of prelect area .54 acres. PRESENTLY APPROXIMATE ACREAGE 0 Meadow of Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres 0 acres Forested 0 Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.} acres Wetland (freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0 acres Water Surface Area __ 0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or {ill} __ O acres __ .14 acres i~Residential [suburban) C~Rural [non-farm) AFTERoCOMPLETION acres O acres 0 acres 0 acres , l 9 . acres · 35 acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces Other [Indscate type)Gravel E~oat Storaqe/Parki~qq A~'ea .40 3. What ~s predom~nan~ sC. mi, type(S) on project s,te? Rd ~ R iverhead Sandy Loam a Soil dramage ~WeU drained 100 % of 5~Te ~Moderately we]~ drained ~ % of sile ~F~orly drained % of s~te b If any agricultural land ~s involved, how many acres of soil are c-lassif~ed w~thln sod group 1 through 4 of the NY~ Land Classdicauon Sy~tem~ acres (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are the~e bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~Yes ~o a. What is depth to bedrock? 600+ ' (in feet) PROJECT DESCRIPTION - VILLAGE MARINE kpplicant proposes to remove existing 26'x 36' metal building and conztruct a 40'x 60' boat repair and storage building. Proposed building location is 28.6' landward of the existing bulkhead and requires a 46.4' variance to the regulated 75' setback. Additionally, applicant proposes to pave, with asphalt, a 595 area landward of the existing bulkhead. As mitigation, applicant will install drainage pools to contain stormwater runoff. Approx,mate percentai]e of proposed project ~tu with slopes. )~(~-t0% ] 00 .% ~1L~15% __ % E~15% or l~reater __ 6, Is project s~bstanhally cont~g~ous to. or ~ntam ~ buildi~g, s~te, or district, lis~ed on the State or the National Regtsters of H~stouc Placest ~Yes ~No Pr tS Proiect substantially conuguous ~o a s~t~ li~ted on the Reg,ster of Natsonal Natural Landmarks? ~Yes ~No 8 What is the depth of th~ wate~ tablet 0'-8' {in feet] 9. Is 5l~e located over a primary, pn~c,pal, or ~ole source aquder~ ~Yes 10 Do huntmg, fishmg or shell hsh,ng opportunmes presently exist ,n the prolecl area? ~Yes ' ~No 11 Does project s~te centare any s~ecles ~f plant or an,mai lite that is sdentd~ed as threatened or endangeredt ~Yes ~No Accord,rig ~o Fie~d inspection 12. Are there any umque or unusual land tOtm~ ~n the pto~ect s~te? {~e.. cliffs, dunes, other geological Descnbc 13 Is the project s,?~,./presentty u~ed by the contmumty or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area,~ LfYes ~xNO If yes. e~pldin ~ 14 Does the present~e ~nclude scemc vsews known to be important to the commumty~ ~es ~o 15 Streams w~thm or conhguous :o Prolec: area ~amen eFeek a Name al Stream and name of R;v.t to which il is tributary OFea~ Peeonte Bay 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland ,~ru~s withm et conhguous Io project area: a Name b, Size (In acres) 17 Is the s~te served by ex~tmg public ut!iihes¢ t,'~r'es ~No a) It V.s. do~s softie,eot capac,ty e,ist to ailo~ connec~ion~ ~Yes ~o (~ansion b] If Yes, will ~mpro~ements be necessary lo allow connection~ ~Yes of ezi~tlng use) 18 is d~e s~te located m an agncut~ur(I/d~stnct certdmd pursuant ta'A~icultu~e and Markets Law, ArUcle Section ~0~ and JO4< ~Yes 19. Is the site located in at substantiall~onu~uous to a Critical [nvironmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6'17~ ~Yes ~No (Tributary to Peconic ~y) 2Q Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes~ ~Yes ~No B. Project Description 1, Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill irt dimensions as appropriate). 54 a Total conbguous acreage owned or cnntrolled b~prqject sponsor, b Project acreage to be developed' .05 (ex'pension) .05 · acres mlbally; c. Project acreage to remora o~,deveJoped 0 _ acres. d. Length of project, in miles;, n/a (If appropriate) e It the prelect is an e:~panslon, indicate percen! of expansion proposed n/a %; f Number ot oJf-Hreet parkmg spaces existing .... 5 -~; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips iienerated per hour 8 h If residenhdl: NuFnber and type of housing u~ts n/a On~. Family Two Family Multiple Family Ultimately s D~mens~ons (m feet) of largest proposed structure __ * he,ght; 60 J Linear feet ot frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is~ , 50 tt · less than 35' 3 . __ acres ultJmately (upon con'tpletion of prolectJ? Condominium length ;L HOw much natu~a{ rna,'enal Oe. rock. earth, e~c ) ',viii be removed t~om the 5itu? 3. Will disturbed area~ b~ recla~m~d~ ~yes ~No ~N/A ~ I~ y~s, for wh~t m~end~d purpo~ ~s ~he ~e bein~ ~eclaimed~ b will topsml b~ stockpded for [edamabon~ ~Yes ~No c. Will upper subsoil ~e S oc~p led ~or reclama~ion~ ~Yes ~No 0 4. How many acres of v~ae[anon (trees, shrubs. ~roufld covers) will ~e removed from ~te~ acre~ 5. Will any matu~fo~es~ (over 1~ years oid) or other Ioc~dly-imponant vegetation be removed by th~s prolect~ ~ If single phase prolec~ Anticipated pe~od o~ ~on~tru~on _ momh% bnd~dm~ demolition) ~. It multi-phased: n/a a. To~ai number ot phases anticipated {number] b. Anticipated dare of commencement phase 1 c Approximate completion date oi final phase d ts phas~ i tunct~onaHy dependent on subsequent phases;t §. Will bJastinl~ occur dunng construction? [~Yes 5~o g. Number oi jobs ~eneraled: du[tn~ coflSttuc~lon 0 10 Number ot jobs eliminated by this p~oiect -. 11. W~tl prolect requ*re ~elocaUun ot any prol:cts ar facilities~ 0 tons/cubic yards month year, {includ~ni~ demolition]. month ,, year, ~Yes [qNo ahcr prelect ~S complete 2 []Yes ~o If yes, explain 12. Is surface hquid waste d~sposal mvolved.~ ~Yes a tl yes. red,cate type of waste [sewa.~e. industnaI, otc) and amount · ~ ' ~' d~char~e~ b. Name of waler body in~o which e,fluent w,h be ~N 13. Is subsurface t~qu~d waste d~spos~J mvoiwd~ ~Ye~, o 14 Will surface a~ea of an e~!s~in~ water body increase o~ declea~e by p~oposaltOYes~No Explain 15 I~ projec~ ~r any portion o~ project J~Cated m a 1~ ,year flood plain~ es 16. Wilt the prolecl iunera~e solid was[e~ e~ o a If yes, what is the amount per modth tons b It yes. will an ~xistm~ sohd waste {acH~ty be used~ ~Ye~ ~No c If ye~, 8.ye name ~utho[~ ~ ~fi~ .... ; location ~tho[d, N.~. d. Will any wastes no~ lo into ~ sew~ae disposal ~ystem Or into a sanitary landfilll ~Yes ~No e. If Yes. e~piam , 17. W~tl the prelect ~nvolve the d~sposa[ of sohd waste~ a. Ii yes. what is the antic,pated rate of d sposal? b It yes, what is the antiopated site!hfe~ lB. Will prelect use herbicides or pesticid~:s~ [:]Yes ~Yes tons/month 19. WHI project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per dav]l [3Yr~s [-]¥es ~o 20 Wi I project produce operatintl no,se ~xceedini;J ~he ~o~a] ambient noise lev~ls/ ~Yes ~Noj 21 Will project jesuit m an in~ease in e~e~y use~ , ,, ~lectricitv, heatina'oil 22 If water supply is ilom weJJ~, indicate pumpm~ capacity ** BaiJons/minute. **(existing facility - ~ no increase needed) 23 Total anhclpated water usage per day __ ~alJons/day ~ 24. Does p~olect mvobe Local Slate o~ Federal tundinll QYes o if Ye% expJ*in ' ~5~ Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Ydla~e Board [~Yes ~(No C~ty. To'*n, Vdla~te Planning Board ~'es ~No City, Town Zon;n~ Board '~yes ~No Cily, Count? Health Department ~e~ ~No Other Local A~encles ~Ye~ Other Re;ional A~enc,e~ ~Yes ~o State A~encles ~fe~ ~No Feder~t ~ellcles ~Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Do~s proposed action involve a planmn~ or I1 Yes, indicate decision required Ozomn[~ amendment ~ zor~mi~ Site Plan Approval Sanitary System Upgrade N.Y.S,D,E.C, Art. 25 ]0/88 Pending 10/88 decision? f~/Ye s [~No use permit ~subdiws,on ~'site plan ~special []flew/revision of mdster plan ~resource management plan ~other What ~s the zomng class~t~cahon(sjot the s~te~ What i~ th~ maxm~um potential deveiopment of the s~te ~f developed as permitted by the present zomnS~ ~rina 4 What i~ the p~oposed zon,n~, of the site~ ~-! 5. what is the rnaxm~um potennal developm~n~ of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoninl~ Marina 6. Is the proposed act,on consistent wffh the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans~ ,)~Yes E]No 7 What are. the predominant land u~e{s) end zonm~ classifications within a % rode radius of proposed action~ ~ist, ing CO~rc~al deVelo~nt ~orth, eas~ & west; residential develg~nt south 8. Is the proposed act,on compaNble with adloinin~utroundin[ land uses withi~ a % toilet e~ ~No 9. If the proposed acnon i~ lhe ~ubdlvisio~ o~ land, how many lots are p[opo~edl n/a a Whal is the minimum lot s~ze p~oposed~ 10 Wdl proposed action [equ,~e an? au~ho~lza/Jon(~) for the formation ot sewer ot water di~tricts~ ~Yes Will the proposed aclion c[ea~a demand [o[ an~ communiW provided services (~ec~eauon, education, ponce, fi,e prot~ctio~)~ ~Yes ~No a If ye% is exi~Nn~ capacity ~u[ficient ~o handle p~ojec~d demand~ ~Ye~ ~No Will propoie~ action result in lhe 8eneralion ot l[affic si~ndican[l~ above p[e~e~[ levelst ~Yes ~No a. If ~es, ~ the e~hn~ toad network adequate to handle t~e additional t~atfic~ ~es ~No D. Informational Detalia Attach any add,honal information as may be ne~_,ded [o clarify your project ff there are or may be any adverse impact~ associated with ~,our proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures wMch you propose to mitiltate or avoid thern E. Verification I certify th,~t the inlormat~on prowded above ~ true to the best of my kn°w[ed~e"ariP, s ^ppucantl~pja~er ...... rName .... Tanya Lachenmeyer/Land._ U~e~ Company for V~llage D~e 9/30/9~ Il the action ii in the Coattal Area, and you are a ltate¥~ten¢)~ complele Ihe Coaslal Aileilment Form before proceedinl with this aises~,ment. 5 Psrt 2--PROJ~ICT IMPtACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Respon~iFqllty of Lead A~ency Ganeral Info,motion (Read Carefully) · In compleun~ the [orm the reviewer should ~e ~u~d~d by the que~bon: Have my responses and determmabons been re~onable~ The ~ev~ewer ~s not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identitying that an ;mpacl w;H be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that ~t ;s also necessarily tiiniticint. Any large m~pact mu~t bu evaluated m PART 3 [o determine significance, Identilyin~ a~ impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at tu~ther e The Example~ pro,,~ded are ~o assist the ~evl~wer by showm~ types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would tr~gger a response in column 2 The examples are~enerailyappllcablethroughout the Sta[e and for most s,tu~t,on~ But. ~or an~ specific ~roiect or site other exan~ple~ and/or lower [hresholds m~y be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, ~hu~ requ~nn~ evaluation m Part 3 · The imDacls of each project, on each Stye, in each locality, will v~ry. Therefore, the examples are H~ustt~tlVe and have been oHered as ~mdance They do not constitute an exhaustive h~t of tmp~ts and th~usholds to answer each question · ~he number of examples per question does not indicate the smportance of each question · In ~denti~y,ng smpacts, cons~de~ Ion~ term. short term and cumlatlve effects Instru¢lions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 que~llons in PART 2 ~n~wef ~ If there w~ll be any impact b Maybe answers ~ho~Id be considered as ~es answers. c. ~f answerm~ Yes to a question then ch~ck [h~ appropriate box [column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the ~mpact If impac~ threshold equals or e~ceeds 2ny e~amp[e provided, check column 2 If impact wilt occur bu~ ~hreshold is tower than example, check culumn 1 d If reviewe~ h~ doub[ abou[ s~ze ot (he imp~cl then consider the impact a~ potentially large and proceed to PART 3 e. If a po~emlaJly large nnpact checked m column 2 can be m;[isated by chan~s) in the p~OleCt ~o a ~mall to moderate impact, also check the Yes Pox ~n column t A NO response indicates that such a reduclion ~s not possible, This must be explained Ul Part 3 iMPACT ON LAND Will the propo~d action re~uh m .~ phys~,~al chan~e to the prolect [3NO ~YES [xample~ that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 1S% or Ereater, (15 foot rise pe~ foot of length), or where ~he ~eneral s~opes m the project area exceed 10%. Construction on [and wh~re the d~pth to the water table is less than Construction of paved parkm8 area ~or ~,~ or more vehicle~. Con~tructio~ on land where bedrock ~ ezpo~ed ot 8eneraHy within 3 feet of existm~ ~round surtace.' Con~[ruction that will continu~ for more than I year or revolve more than one phase or sta~e Excawtion foe retain8 purposes ~h~t w~u~d remove more than 1,~ tons o~ natural material [~ e., rock or sod} per Construction o¢ ~xpan~on of a ~a~itary Construction m a designated floodway Other ~mpacts 2. WHI there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? ti.e, clitfs, dunes, geological formabons, etc · Specific land forms I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact 8e Moderate Large Mitigated By Impaot Impact Project Change [] [] [3Yes I~No [] [~ ~]Yes F~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 6 IMPACT ON WATER Wdl proposed acuon affect any wa[er body designated as ptotected~ (gndel Articles 15 24, 25 ot [he Enw~onrnentai Collser~,,atlon Law. ECL) gNO OYES lxamptes that would apply ~o column 2 Developable at~a of sile contains a ptotecied water body. Oredjmg mote than 1~) cubic ~(d~ of material from channel of a protected sueam Extension ot uld~ty d~str,but~on facilities through a protecIed water body Construction In 4 desk,naiad f~eshwater or ~;d~i ~,,edand Other ~mpacts. 4 Wdt proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water~ L-JNO ~YES £~,amp{es thai wou!d apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease m th~ suriace area o~ ~ny body of water - Construction of a body el wa[er [hat e~ceeds ~0 ~cres of suriace area · Other impacts: Will Proposed ^chon ~ffec[ surface ot groundwater quality ot quantity/ ~NO ~YES Examplei that wouJd ~ppiy [o ~o~umn 2 Proposed Action will r~qu~re a d~scharge permit Proposed Action requires use of a ~our(e oi wa~er that does not have approval lo ~e~ve pmpo*ud {project) Proposed Ac6on ~eqmres water ~uppJY from wells with ~rea~er ihan 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity supply system Proposed Action will adversely a~fect 8rouodwater Liquid effluent will be co~veyed oft ~he site [o tacdllies which presently do no~ ex~st or have inadequate Proposed Achon would ~e wa[er m excess of 20,~ ~atlon~ per day. Proposed Ac[ion will hkely cause sdtat~on or other d,~char~e into an existm8 body of wate~ to ~he ex[em [ha[ there will be an obvious visual P¢oposed Action will require [h~ ~tora~e of petroleum er chemical products greater than 1,1~ Proposed Action will allow ~esidential uSe~ In atea~ w,thout wafer Propos~,d Action locates commercial and/or indus~ua[ uses which may facilities Other impacb 6 Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ~!,NO ~YES E,~amp!es that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would chan~e flood water flows I ,2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change' [] ~ I'-~ Yes [-]No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ Oyes Oho ~ ~ ~es ~No ~ 0 ~Yes ONo ~ ~ OYes ~no ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~No ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~No ~ ~ ~Wes ~No · Proposed Act,on ;nay cau~,e subs;,~mial eros,ga · Proposed Action wdl a,,ow aevei~.pmen, ,n a d~s~gnated floodway. · griper impacts IMPACT ON AIR Will proposed ,~ct~on affect a~, quaht¥? []NO F~'TES F~arrlptel that would apply ~o coiumn 2 Proposed Achon wdl reduce I,~ o~ more vehicle trips In any ~lven hour Proposed Action ~]11 result m the mcmerat,on ct more than I ton of refuse per hour Emiss,on rat~ of tot~t cont~mm~nt~ w,i~ exceed 5 ibL per hour or a heat source pruducin8 more ~h,m 10 mdhon BTU's per hour. Proposed acuon will allow ~n mc;,:~e m the amoun~ of land comm,tted to industtia~ use Proposed ~ctian wdl ~Ho~ an mcrea~ m the d,msny o[ ~ndustrial Other impacts IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Actiun atlect any threatened o: endangered specms~ ~NO rqyE$ Example~[, ~hat wou~d ~pply tO column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the ~ew Yo~k or Federal list, ~sing the sKe, ove~ Or near s~te or found on the site. Removal of any poruon of a crittcal or s,gmhcant wddhfe habitat. Applicabon gl pesticide o~ he~b,c~de mo~e than twice a year, other than for agflcuhuta] purposes Other ~mpacts:_ 9 Will Proposed ACtion substantially atfect non-th(eatened or non.endangered species1 ONO FqYES t:xamples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed ^ct~on would ~ub~tantiail~ interfere with any resident or miglatory fish, shellfish or wddhfe ~pecle~ IMPAOT ON AGRtOULTURAL ~ND 10 Wdl the Proposed Action aJfect agr~cuhu~a~ ]and resources? ~NO Ex~mplel :h~t woaid apply to column 2 land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, wnevard, orchard. 8 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] F"I r~lyes [] [] []Yes ~NO ~ ~ ~Yes ~NO ~ ~ ~Yes ~ E] Wes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~es ~No ~ ~ Wes ~ ~ ~Ves ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ F2 Wes ~o ~ ~ ~Ves · Con~trucbon actiw(¥ would e~c~vdte or compact the soil profile of aljricuitural land · The proposed achon wou~d ' of agricultural land or, ~t Ioc;~ted m an A~ricu~tutal O~trict, mo~e than 2 5 acres ~t a~ricul~ural land ~ · The p~oposed ac~on would dl~ upi or prevent m~t~Hation ot a~ricultural land manasement system~ (e ~. subsurface d¢~m hnes, oudet diiches, str~p c~oppm~]; o~ c~ea~e a need for ~uch measures (e.~. cause a ~arm held to dram poorly due to increased runoii] · Other impacts IMPACT ON AESTHEI"JC 11 Will proposed achon affect aeslhe~ic resources? (if ~ecessa~y, use the V~;~*i EAF Adde~dum m Section 617 21, Appendix B] ~amples that ~ould ~pp]y [O column 2 or m ~h~rp c~nt~as~ to current s~rro~ndm~ i~gd u~e patterns, whether man,made or natural * Proposed land uses. or project compoflenls visible to aesthetic resources which wd~ eh~ma~e or s~mhc~r, tiy r~duce ~creenin8 of 5cemc wews known to be m~pottant to the area , Other impacts: iMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. will Proposed Action impact achy s~te or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? L~NO Example~ that would apply to column 2 e Proposed Action oc[ur~m~ wholly or partially w~thin or coflti~uous [o any facih~y or site J*~[ed on the S~a[e or National of historic places * Any impact to an arch.eoJo~(al site or fosse) b~d located within the project ~ Proposed A(hon will occur in an area de~n-~ted as sensitive archaeolo~,cal sites on the NYS Site Inventory e Other m~pacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND R~C~F,[ATION 13 Wdl Proposed Action afiec[ ,,he quantity or qualify gl exlstmV, or future open spaces or recreahOnal OpportunKles~ The permar~en[ foreclosure gl ~ ~ure lffc~e~ho~J oppottum[y. Other ,mpacts 9 1 2 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impac[ Project Change [] [~ I~lyes L""J NO ~ ~] '~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ONo ~ ~ ~Ves ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ Q ~ ~No SMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14 WiI~ there be an eifect to ex~.tmg transportation systems? [xample~ that would app!y [o column ~ Alteration of pre,raj pat[ems of movement ol people and/or goods. Other impacts IMPACT ON ENERGY t5 Wdl proposed 8ctlon affect the commumt¥'-~ ~ource~ oS fuel or energy supply? ~NO Example~ that wou!d appl~ to column 2 · P~oposed Action wdl cause a grea~e~ than 5% increase ~n 0~e use of any term of energy in the munioPahW. · Proposed ActiOn wdJ transm{ss~on or supply ~ys~em to serve mote Lhan 50 single or two ~amHy · Other impaCt~ NOISE AND ODOR *iMPACTS 10 '~/iiJ there be ob~ect*cnable odors, noise, or v~bradun os a result ot the Proposed Action,' ~NO I~yES £~amples that ~ou~d apply ~o column 2 · Blasting with*n 1,5b¥ teat el o ho~pit~l, schnoi o~ a~he~ sons,rive · Odors wdJ OCZCU[ routinely (mare than one hour pe~ day), · Pro~sed Acliofl will p~oduce operating noise exceeding the local · Proposed Ac~on wdl remove na~urat burners that would let as a noise screen. · Other impacts_ IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect pubiic health and saSety~ ~NO ~ample~ that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Acbon may cause a risk of explosion or release oS hazardou~ substances Oe od, pesticide~, chemicals, radiation, otc )m the event o~ acodent or upset condl[ion~, o~ there may be ~ chronic low level discharge or emJ~on · Proposed Action may result m the burial ~[ "ho~ardou* ,~,a~tes 'n any {nrta (i e toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, rotating, · Storage tacdme~ tot one m~maa or more gaHon~ o~ hquifled natural ga~ or other {lammable hqu~d~ within 2,~ ~eet et a ~ite used tar the d*spos~l o~ ~ohd ot hazardous · Other m~paCt5: 10 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change rqYes []:]No C3, o r'qNo ~Yes []]No ~Ye~ ~No [~¥es [::]No ~¥es []No []]Yes []]No ~Yes [~No []]Yes []]NO j C]Ye~ I-iNn iMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEiGH~IORHOOD Will proposed action atfec'~ the ch,~ractet nE the ~x~tin~ commumW? ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent paput~bon of the emi, town ot village in which the ~he mumopal bud~e¢ ~o~ capit~] expe~d~tute~ or operating services Proposed ac0on ~HI confi~c[ with o~hcial[y a~opted plans or Proposed Action will ~ep]ace of ehmmate e~sting facdmes, structure~ or az~as of his~oflc t~pof[4~ce [o the commumty Development will cre~e a demand for add~t~bnai com~umty services (e.g schools police and fire, etc) Proposed Action will s~t an m~portan~ precedent for f,~ture projects Proposed Action wdl c~eate or chromate employment Other ~mpacts I 2 3 Small to ~otential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Cl~ange E3 [] E3¥es [] [] E3~es [] FTM ~¥es ~No [] ~ DiYe~_ [] [] [~Ves [3No [] [] [~Yes ~]No [] [] DYes gNo ~ ~ ~¥es q--iNa ]9 ts the~e, or ~s there hkel¥ to be, pubhc controvetly related to po;ent~a; ad~'r~.e en,,ir~,nmental ~mpacts? ~NO ~YLS If Any Action tn Part 2 t~ Identified as a Potential Large Impact or It You Cannot Determine ~h~ ~4a~nltu~e ~f Impact, Proceed to Pall 3 Pa~ 3--EVALUATI~N OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility oJ Lead Agency Part 3 must be p~epared ii o~e or more impacl(~) is confidered to be potentially large, even iJ the impact(s} may be miliiated. J Discuss the loJmowind Jot each impac~ {de{~ldaed l~ CoJum~ 2 of P~l 2: 1 Briefly describe the {mpacl I 2 Describe {d apphcable) how {he m~pact could be ml{l~a~ed or reduced to a small ~o moderate m~pact by project chan~s) 3 Based on the inJormatlon available, de~,de d ,t ~¢ reasonable to conclude that th,s impact is To answer the question ot impo~taqce, consider. · The probablhty of the impact ~ccutrlng · The duration of [he impact J I~s itteve~slbJiity, incJudinj per~anendy lost resources nj value · Whether the impact can or wii~ be : The regional consequence of t~e impact Its potenhal divergence ffom I~cal needs and ~oal~ · Wheti~er known objec~iom~ ~o ~he pfolect relate to th~ {Continue on attachments) 11 TO GLUECKERT AND WIEBER ARCHITECTS 300 Wheeler Road - Suite 303 HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788 (516) 234-4897 WE ARE SENDING YOU ,.~Attached [~ Under separate cover via / [] Shop drawihgs [] Prints [~ Plans [] Copy of letter [] Change order [] Samples the following items: [] Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: [] For approval ~l~For your use As requested [] For review and comment [] FOR BIDS DUE L3 Approved as submitted [] Approved as noted [] Returned for corrections [] 19 [] Resubmit [] Submit__ [] Return copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO_ TO GLUECKERT AND WIEOER~ ARCHITECTS 300 Wheeler Road - Suite 303 HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788 (516) 234-4897 WE ARE SENDING YOU [~A~ached [] Under separate cover via [] Shop drawings (~Prints [] Plans [] Copy of letter [] Change order [] [] Samples the following items: [] Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ~For approval [] For your use [:~'~s requested [] For review and comment [] FOR BIDS DUE [] Approved as submitted [] Approved as noted [] Returned for corrections [] [] Resubmit [] Submit [] Return copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints 19 [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS__ 'a'--,,::..--. i SOUTHOLD TOWN COPY TO PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 August 30, 1991 David G. Young Village Marine P.O.Box 1045 Mattituck, New York 11952 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Village Marine E/s Bay Avenue, 140' S/o SR 25, Mattituck, N.Y. Dear Mr. Young: This is to confirm the main points of a conversation we had during the Plannihg Board's field inspection of this property on August 16, 1991. It was agreed that the proposed site plan will be changed as follows: Landscaping will be installed in the front yard. The LILCO/NYTel. pole will be moved. The fence in the front will be moved back to make room for two parking spaces in the front yard. Parking spaces will be allowed along the bulkhead. They will be placed behind a planter that will be continuous except where there are entrances/steps the dock. (Parallel parking spaces should be no smaller than 9' by 25'.) to The grade of the property shall slope away from the bulkhead and planters towards the north. The use of bluestone throughout the site, except for the landscaping areas will be acceptable. The 20' buffer will be reduced to 10' along the northeastern property line, next to the residential zone, provided it is heavily planted. The plan will show a boat storage area east of the new addition. For your convenience, I have enclosed the sketch that was used during our discussion. It has been revised to incorporate most of the changes noted in this letter. Also, as discussed at your July 29th meeting with Valerie Scopaz, please include the drainage calculations for the entire site, the location of the boat washdown pad, the location of the pump-out facility, a copy of the DEC permit and a copy of a completed long environmental assessment form. Upon receipt of eight (8) copies of the revised site plan, the Planning Board hopes to start the environmental review. If any questions or concerns should arise, please do not hesitate to contact Valerie Scopaz of this office for assistance. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, '~r. ~/~ Chairman Enc. VS:vs cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Gerald Anderus, Gluekert & Wieber, Architects Charles Bowman, Land Use Co. PoS. The enclosure is hard to read because it is a copy of a tracing paper sketch superinposed over the blueprint. Changes are noted in red to make it easier to read. 'r 1"\¥ MEMORANDUM TO FILE On July 29, 1991 I met with Dave Young, oneAQ~ the owners, and his consultants, Chuck Bowman and Gerry ?~ purpose of the meeting was to help the applicant bring the site plan into compliance with the Zoning Code and the conditions imposed by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Please refer to Planning Board letter of July 24, 1991 for details as to what is wrong with the site plan as proposed. This meeting had been in the works for several weeks. A revised site plan was sumbmitted on May 16, 1991. It was reviewed by the Planning Board on May 30th. Originally the Board decided to send a general letter notifying the applicant of the problems with the site. I made the decision to call a meeting of the applicant and his consultants for two reasons. First, it seemed that there was incomplete communication among the parties representing the applicant. Second, it was difficult to both describe the problems with the site and to propose alternative solutions in writing. It took more than two weeks to arrange a mutually convenient meeting date. At the meeting, I explained the technical and design insufficiencies with the proposed site plan. I also made some suggestions as to how the design problems might be resolved. Dave Young wanted to think about some of the suggestions before instructing his architect to make any changes. He felt that some of the suggested design changes might not work. The next day his architect faxed a sketch layout, which included some of the design changes that I had suggested, but which Mr. Young had said he did not want. I called Mr. Young to confirm whether the faxed material reflected a change of mind and was told that they had not seen the new sketch. I received a message from Mr. Young the next day or so asking if I would come down to the marina with the site plan. On August 7th I did so. I spoke with Mr. Young's partner, Pete. He indicated what changes they felt could be made to bring the site into compliance. After that meeting I drew another sketch layout to illustrate where they feel the parking could be located. Both sketches are on the same piece of tracing paper in the file. On August 8th I reviewed the applicants' suggestions with the Planning Board. The Board decided they should walk the property before coming to any final decisions. They set an inspection date for the 16th at 3:45 P.M. GI. UECKEET AND WIEi)IER~ ARCHITECTS '300 Wheeler Road - Suite 303 HAUPP~UGE, HFW YORK [[?88 (516) 234-4897 WE ARE SENDING YOU ~FAtt~ched ~ Copy of I~er THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked bemow: ~ For approval F1 For your use [] As requested E~or review and comment [] FOR BIDS DUE Fl Approved as submitted ~ Approved as noted I"l Returned for corrections E3 Resubmit cop)as /Dr ,. c'. r-i Submit copies ,',:,r dist,'.,: ~ F1 R~turn corrected Arinti , ,, ).9 ....... I:) PRINTS RETURNEO AFTER LOAN T,) ~:3 W W W W PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOnFF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 July 24, 1991 Carmine Grasso Gluekert and Wieber, Architects 300 Wheeler Road, Suite 303 Hauppauge, New York 11788 Re: Proposed Site Plan Village Marine Peconic Bay Boulevard, Mattituck SCTM ~ 1000-122-3-15 Dear Mr. Grasso: This is to confirm that a meeting has been set for 10 o'clock A.M. on Monday, July 29, 1991, at the Planning Board office. It is our understanding that a representative of your office will be present, along with Ms. Lachenmeyer of the Land Use Company, and the owner, Dave Young. The purposes of the meeting are first, to review problems with the proposed site plan that was submitted to the Planning Board, and second, to arrive at solutions. The following list illustrates the topics that will be discussed at the meeting. First, some elements of the site plan do not conform to the zoning code. For instance, the design of some of the parking spaces is not in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Zoning Code. Second, some of the required elements of the site plan are missing, such as the location and substance of the landscaped buffer areas and landscaping specified by the Zoning Code. Other missing elements include the locations of the curb cut, the boat wash down area, the dumpster and the pump-out facility. Third, the proposed location of the parking spaces is not acceptable. Fourth, the proposed drainage plan does not accomodate the runoff from the entire site, as required by the Zoning Board's approval. At your request I have enclosed a copy of the comments, questions and suggestions that were placed on the site plan by Planning Board and staff. This copy is enclosed for discussion purposes only. Incorporation of all the site plan elements mentioned above into the site plan will result in some changes to the proposed layout. Please bring with you a copy of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's permit; and a completed copy of the full Environmental Assessment form. A blank copy of the assessment form has been enclosed for your convenience. We will need a copy of the proposed floor plan, showing the square footage within the existing and proposed building that will be dedicated to each of the projected uses: office area, repair and servicing, storage. In closing I would like to repeat that the purpose of the meeting is to decide how to best bring the site plan into conformance with the Zoning Code and the conditions of approvals by the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Trustees. We look forward to meeting with you and your client on July 29th. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encls. cc: Dave Young, Village Marine Tanya Lachenmeyer, Land Use Company / / / New York State Department Znvironmental Conservation Building 40--SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 (516) 751-1389 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner June 20, 1991 Charles W. Bowman Land Use Company 2576 Sound Ave. Baiting Hollow, N.Y. 11933 RE: NYSDEC Permit Application #10-88-1869 Village Marine Dear Mr. Bowman: The Department has received the copy of the Town of Southold's action on the zoning board of appeals for the above referenced application. Please submit 3 copies of the final proposal, and a location map (coordinates must be entered into the Department's computer). Be sure that the plans are dated (with any revision dates notes) and the preparer's names is on the plans. For clarification, please submit a current project description. Sincerely, Karen A. Munze Sr. Environmental Analyst KAM/rw cc: Village Marine Town of Southold Planning Bd. file TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, llI, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krtlpski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 June 11, 1991 Land Use 2576 Sound Avenue Baiting Hollow, N.Y. 11933 RE: Village Marine Permit 910-88-122-3-15.1 Dear Ms. Lachenmeyer: The following actions were taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on June 6, 1991: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees approve the request for an extension to permit ~0-88-122-3-15.1 to expire on April 28, 1992. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB: jmt W,~M-O06 (Rev. 6/89) RECEIVED APR 2 5 199 Notice No. I Bureau of WastewaterManag~ent Suffolk Cofinty'cSnter Riverhead, New York 11901 516-548-3312 /~ ~ /~ [ ] Town and/or Village Zoning Letter [ ] Public Water/Sewer Availability Letter [ ] C~,~leted Application Form ~-004 (3 copies)[ ~NYSDEC Wetlands Permit or Waiver~ ] SEQRA Determination ] SPDES Form [ ] SPDES Site Plan 8 1/2" x 11" [ ] Restrictive Covenants: Art. 7 Other [ ~ Processing Fee ~3OO ~ ~-~.~ ~ [ ] SPDES Fee $50.00 $75.00 [ ] Denitrification Permit Application [ ] Monitoring/Sampling Plan (8 1/2" x 11") [ ~,~-Review Board Determination [ ] Tax Map Designation [ ] Metes and Bounds Description [ ] Lot Size [ ] Deed Location [ ]_Key Map [ ~]'Test Hole-- ~ ~'~ [ ~,~ Gross Floor Area of Building~ [ ] All Surface Waters Within 300' [ ~Private Well Details and Location [~/~ Neighboring Wells and Sewage Syst~s within 150' of Property [ ] Monitoring Well Detail and Location [ ] Latitude and Longitude Description [ ] Plans NOt Signed/Sealed [ ] Industrial Stat~nt/Signature [ ~.~ Sewage Syst~ Plan/Profile [ .)/'Gallons/Day/Acre Sewage Discharge [ ~,]~Sewage Disposal Design Calculations [ ] Insufficient Denitrification Details [ ] Public Water/Se~r Line [ ] Expansion Area for Sewage Systems [ ] Site Statistics [ ] Capital Costs of Sanitary Systemor Capital Cost of Denitrification ] Operation and Maintenance Information [ ~ Project does not conform to Depa~t~,ent standards. See Notice of Non-Conformance. Approval cannot be granted without ] Ecology [ ] DPW [ ] Oil Tanks TO GLUECKERT AND WIEBEI~ ARCHITECTS 300 Wheeler Road - Suite 303 HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788 (516) 234-4897 WE ARE SENDING YOU I~ Attached [] Under separate cover via [] Shop drawings [~Prints [] Plans [] Copy of letter [] Change order [] [] Samples the following items: [] Specifications COPIES DATE NO, DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRA~NSMITTED as checked below: ~ For approval [] Approved as submitted [] For your use ~s requested [] For review and comment E] FOR BIDS DUE 19 [] Approved as noted [] Returned for corrections [] [] Resubmit.__ [] Submit [] Return copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO_ SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latharn, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 December 11, 1990 Carmine Grasso Glueckert and Wieber Architects 300 Wheeler Road - Suite 303 Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Village Marine SCTM#1000-122-3-15 Dear Mr. Grasso: The Planning Board has received the Board of Appeal's determination rendered November 29, 1990, on your request for a variance. The following changes must be made before the Board can proceed with its review of your client's site plan: Parking for ten (10) cars must be shown, on~ of which must be a handicapped parking space. / The location and details of proposed fencing (type and location) must be shown. Grading, including existing and proposed topography with two-foot contours (on site and two hundred (200) feet beyond the property line), together with spot locations for buildings must be shown. A drainage plan must be submitted showing drainage -~ ~' calculations and details of drainage structures. 5. Show location of curbing and curb cut on Bay Avenue. Show the location and listing of landscaping, buffering and street trees, including type, material, size, quantity and location. Indicate building elevations for all facades and floor plans for the proposed use of floor area. Proof of review by the Health Department is also required. The Planning Board requests a copy of the application filed with the New York Department of Environmental Conservation. If you have any questions or require additional information please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Dave Young, Village Marine Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals John M. Bredemeyer III, President, Trustees APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD scott L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 December 3, 1990 Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. 180 Old Country Road P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Appl. No. 3938 - Village Marine (Variances) Dear Mr. Cuddy: Transmitted for your records is a copy of the determination rendered by the Board of Appeals at our November 29, 1990 Regular Meeting concerning the above application. Please be sure to return to the Building Department and any other agency which may have jurisdiction for appropriate permits or approval prior to commencing construction activities. A copy of this decision has simultaneously been transmitted to the Building Inspectors' and Planning Board Offices for their files and update. Yours very truly, JAMES DINIZIO, JR. Enclosure CHAIRMAN PRO TEM Copy of Decision to: Mr. Victor Lessard, Principal Inspector Jr., Planning Board Chairman Mr. Bennett Orlowski Suffolk County Planning Commission APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOFF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 ACTIONOF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appl. No. 3938: Matter of the Application of VILLAGE MARINE for Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-112, Article XII, Section 100-11lC(I), Article XXIII, Section 239.4, and Article XIX, for permission to construct addition to existing principal building with insufficient setbacks from the bulkhead, the easterly (rear) property line, maintaining the nonconforming northerly (side) setback, and to locate boat storage structure (boat rack) with insufficient setbacks from the northerly (side), westerly, easterly property lines, and bulkhead. Also requested is relief, as may be deemed necessary concerning parking and/or landscaping under the current revisions of the site plan regulations. Zone District: Marine I (M-I). Property location: James Creek, east side of Bay Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 122, Block 3, Lot 15.1. At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on November 29, 1990 the following action was taken: WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted into ~he record concerning this application; and WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, its previous zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, this project has received conditional approval from the Southold Town Trustees and has received a Negative Declaration under the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) by the Town Trustees for this project; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, applicant requests variances to the zoning code as to area setbacks in the proposed: (a) removal of an existinq 36' by 26' metal building presently l~cated at the rear {~ast} of the principal building and in Page 2 -Appl. No. 3938 Application of VILLAGE MARINE Decision Rendered November 29, 1990 place thereof a proposed 60 ft. by 40 ft. addition, and (b) proposed boat rack of a size 11 ft. by 102 ft. {1122 sq. ft. ground area}. The outside area of the site, as well as the existing metal building, has been used for the service, maintenance and/or repair of boats docked at the owner's marina facility, and the addition would encompass the same activities. The boat rack is proposed to compactly store boats which are presently stored for service or repair about the site. The placement of both the addition and the boat rack storage structure will not meet the current requirements of the zoning code as provided under the landscaping or parking requirements and for which relief is also requested. 2. The premises in question is located on the easterly side of Bay Avenue in the Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold, contains a total upland area of approximately 23,645 square feet, and total area as shown on the Suffolk County Tax Maps and assessors records of 39,640+- square feet. 3. The subject premises is located in the Marine I (M-I) Zone District and is and has since prior to the enactment of zoning in 1957 been used for outside boat storage, as well as marina uses, retail uses, engine and boat repairs, servicing, maintenance, sales to the general public, incidental office use, and other related marina uses, and uses accessory thereto. 4. The premises is bounded on the north by a gasoline service station: on the west by a town road (Bay Avenue) and opposite Bay Avenue, a bank; on the east by a real estate office located in the General Business (B) Zone District and partly by a right-of-way which is in the R-40 Residential Zone District; on the south by the existing marina at James Creek. The gasoline station abutting the premises on the north side is also located in the Marine I (M-I) Zone District as well as that area abutting to the south of the subject parcel. 5. The building addition and the storage rack, as proposed, are shown on the site plan prepared by Glueckert and Wieber, Architects, lastly dated October 18, 1990. The setbacks/ for the proposed addition are: (a) 28.6 feet at its closest point to the south along the tie line along wood bulkhead; (b) 48+- feet at its southeast corner to the tie line along the wood bulkhead; (c) at 3.0 feet, maintaining the same northerly side yard setback as the existing building(s); (d) 20+- feet to its closest easterly rear property line; (e) 63+- feet to the furthermost easterly property line, along land referred to as "R-O-W." Page 3 -Appl. No. 3938 Application of VILLAGE MARINE Decision Rendered November 29, 1990 6. The principal building and 36' by 26' metal building, are shown to be set back, as exist since prior to the enactment of zoning: (a) from the southerly bulkhead 28+- feet at their closest points (both addition and metal building) and 42+- and 48+- feet at their furthest setback points, metal building and addition, respectively; (b) from the northerly side property line at 3+- feet at its closest point; (c) from the westerly front property line 32+- feet at its closest oorner; (d) from the easterly property line at its closest point 80+- feet; 49+- feet to the existing metal building from the easterly property line. 7. The upland area of the site is unique in configuration, size, and character, and contains a smaller upland lot size and width than as provided in the current zoning code for total lot size and width. It is noted that although there have been seven parking spaces provided for the current uses and building area on this site; and the Master Plan regulations, as amended January 9, 1989 provides for different methods of calculating the number of parking spaces and the landscaping areas for newly established businesses or new uses. Any business, building or uses which have not been established prior to these amendments would apply under the new regulations, and those that have preexisted these regulations are ~ermitted to continue without a mandate to comply with the new regulations, provided there is no expansion or modified use. - ........ 8. It is the position of this Board that: (a) the addition to the existing principal building is not an expansion of the existing use, nor is it a newly created use, since the addition will be used by employees providing the same services and repair activities which have been conducted at the site in both the existing metal building and outside of the existing building areas and as each relates to the established marina and boat storage uses; (b) the addition to the existing principal building, as proposed, is an improvement that: 1. will provide a protected and heated area for the employees to service and make repairs; Page 4 -Appl. No. 3938 Application of VILLAGE MARINE Decision Rendered November 29, 1990 8 (b). 2. will provide for the discontinuance of repairs in open areas at the site, and these open areas will now be made available for a reduction of congestion and provide better maneuverability and efficient and safe circulation for vehicles and pedestrians, and for parking which was not previously available to the same degree; 3. will make provision for a better parking plan and for increased landscaping, which presently is not provided, and will encourage customers to park on-site rather than along Bay Avenue; 4. will provide all runoff or discharge into drywells or catch basins to prevent runoff into James Creek; (c) the uses and the property as now exists, and has~' existed in the past, do not violate zoning, have been legally established at the site, and are not prohibited under the zoning regulations from continuing; (d) although the Master Plan and Zoning Amendments were adopted subsequent to the establishment of this property and its uses, there is no question in this Board's view that the uses are conforming uses under the current zoning regulations. 9. In considering the application for the building addition to house existing activities without an expansion of use or boat storage area, the Board finds that: (a) the setbacks of the addition, as proposed, are not.excessive as compared to the eXisting established setback to the bulkhead at the southwesterly corner of the principal building; however, the relief in relation to the current zoning regulations, as amended, is substantial as to the total requirements; (b) the unique characteristics of the land and its limited buildable upland area lend to the hinderance of obtaining town approvals without variances; (c) there will not be an increased intensity of use at the site; Page 5 -Appl. No. 3938 Application of VILLAGE MARINE Decision Rendered November 29, 1990 (d) if the variance for the addition were not granted, the same uses and services are allowed to continue and the effects of limited parking and landscaping or aesthetic effects on the. surrounding area would not be enhanced except by voluntary abandonment by the property owner over which the town has no control; (e) the addition will not, in the board's view, be, harmful aesthetically or be substantially adverse to public health, welfare or safety of the community. (f) strict compliance with the zoning ordinance, as amended January 9, 1989 in the Master Plan Update, will cause ~.'~ practical difficulties since there is no other alternative to pursue, without a arlance; (g) the relief, as alternatively granted, is not unreasonable and is the minimum necessary; (h) the relief, as alternatively granted, will not alter the essential character of this waterfront business and residential community; (i) attempts to improve the utilization of the premises are hindered due to the unique characteristics of the land; and sufficient proof has been demonstrated to show practical difficulties in the use and proposed improved development of his property necessitating the variance for the subject proposed addition; (j) the interests of justice will best be served by granting a variance, as alternatively noted below, for an addition to the proposed building. (k) the continued use, within the proposed building addition will not adversely affect the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience, and order of the town; (1) the addition and its use thereof are both in harmony with and will promote the general purposes and intent of zoning. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE, the relief requested for an unenclosed boat rack storage structure of a size 11.0 by 102.0 feet, as applied; and Page 6 -Appl. No. 3938 Application of VILLAGE MARINE Decision Rendered November 29, 1990 RESOLVED, to alternatively APPROVE a 60 ft. by 40 ft. addition to the principal building, with reduction under the landscaping and parking regulations of the zoning code and as more particularly shown on the plan prepared by Glueckert & Wieber, Architects, lastly dated October 18, 1990 SUBJECT TO THE FDLLOWING CONDITIONS: · 1. Setbacks shall not be less than that applied for and shown on the October 18, 1990 plan; 2. Ten (10) On-site parking spaces shall be provided, which must remain open and unobstructed at all times/ and each stall must be painted or otherwise marked to be easily noticeable. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen and Dinizio. (Absent were Member Sawicki and Chairman Goehringer, who abstained in this matter.) This resolution was duly adopted. /CHAIRM3~N PRO TEM PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 TO: FROM: RE: PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD James Dinizio, Chairman Pro Tem Board of Appeals Pending Site Plan - Village Marine SCTM# 1000-122-3-15.1 DATE: November 1, 1990 SCO'I-r L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 The following is in response to your request of October 24, 1990, requesting the Board's review of the parking requirements for Village Marine. With the exception of space number three (3), the parking spaces indicated on the map do not conform to Code requirements. Specifically, spaces one (1), two (2) and four (4) through twenty (20) are in an area that the Code requires be set aside for landscaping for parking lot screening and buffering (Article XXI 100-210, 212, 213, 214 and 215). In addition, spaces five (5), six (6), and eight (8) do not have the required twenty-two foot (22) back up space. Essentially these spaces are not useable. Further, some of the spaces must be designed for handicapped access, but are not. The proposed boat rack is also located in an area required for the transition buffer between residental and marine business zones. Further, the site plan does not include the boat storage rack and the retail sales operation uses in the parking calculations. The Code requires one parking space for each boat in dry storage, and two (2) parking spaces for the retail accessory use. More spaces are required than the twenty-nine noted on the site plan. The applicant should be asked to submit corrected parking calculations on plans that include the handicapped spaces, the boat rack spaces and the iZspaces, all in conformance with the Code. In closing, the Board is not in favor of this variance request because the site should be brought into compliance first. Please review the attached copies of the Board's past correspondence to your Board (October 2, 1990) and to the applicant (September 21, 1990). PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD scoTr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals FROM: DATE Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairman~.o.~/~ October 2, 1990 RE: Village Marine SCTM# 1000-122-3-15 The following is in response to your request for comments on Application No. 3938, Village Marine. The Planning Board is not in favor of granting the requested variances for insufficient setbacks and relief from parking and landscaping requirements. The Boards reason's for not being in favor are as follows: The property is over developed now. The requested relief from the requirement for twenty nine (29) parking spaces cannot be met with the seven (7) spaces shown on the proposed site plan. In addition, the proposed boat storage racks have not been included in either the lot coverage or parking calculations. Finally there is no landscaping on site. And none is proposed on the site plan. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 September 21, 1990 Carmine Grasso Glueckert and Wieber Architects 300 Wheeler Road - Suite 303 Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Village Marine SCTM#1000-122-3-15 Dear Mr. Grasso: The Planning Board has received your revised site plan dated August 8, 1990. The following changes must be made before the Planning Board can proceed: Parking for 29 cars must be shown on site, including two (2) handicapped parking spaces. e The location and details of fencing (type and location)must be shown. Grading, including existing and proposed topography with two-foot contours (on site and two hundred (200) feet beyond the property line), together with spot locations for buildings must be shown. A drainage plan must be submitted showing drainage calculations and details of drainage structures. Accessory boat storage racks must be set back thirt~ five (35) feet from the front yard and twenty (20) feet from the side yard. In addition, the proposed building and boat storage racks must be seventy five (75) feet from the bulkhead on James Creek. Since this setback cannot be met on this property, an application for a variance must be made to the Board of Appeals. 6. Boat storage racks must be included in percent of lot coverage calculations. Page 2 Village Marine 7. Indicate height of boat storage racks. 8. Show location of curbing and curb cut on Bay Avenue. Show a concrete boat wash down pad with drainage in the center, including access for clean out. 10. Show the location and listing of landscaping, buffering and street trees, including type, material, size, quantity and location. I1. Indicate building elevations for all facades and floor plans for the proposed use of floor area. Proof of review by the Health Department is required. A permit from the Town Trustees is also required for this project. The Planning Board requests a copy of the application filed with the New York Department of Environmental Conservation. If you have any questions or wish to have a presubmission conference to resolve any issues before proceeding, please don't hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman RGK/hp cc: Dave Young Gerard P. Goehringer, Board of Appeals John M. Bredemeyer III, President, Trustees APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD £K SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town. Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Board Attention: Valerie Scopaz, Planner James Dinizio, Chairman Pro Tem Board of Appeals October 24, 1990 Planning Board Letters of 9/21/90 and 10/2/90 Pending Site Plan - Village Marine SCTM #1000-122-3-15.1 With reference to the above application, please find attached the latest print of site plan showing 20 proposed parking spaces. As you may know, the hearing on this application has been continued until Thursday, November 1, 1990, and we ask your review as to whether or not the parking layout as shown on this plan is conforming under the requirements for site plans -- with the exception, of course, that the plan is nine parking spaces short of the code requirements. Please provide our office with your comments as early as possible, or in the alternative, please feel free to have a representative from your department attend the hearing. The hearing has been continued for 9:10 p.m. on 11/1/90. PAGE 3 COMPLETED APPLICATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ENB-- REGION I REGION 1 REGION IS REGION 1N NASSAU COUNTY 80 Waterfront Ltd, 4042 Austin Blvd. Island Park, NY 11558 Majestic Marina 2 t 7 Woodcleft Ave. Freeport, NY 11520 SUFFOLK COUNTY W. G. Rafferty 795 Prospect Ae. W. Hartford, CT 06105 Peter G. Peterson 237 Park Ave. New York, NY 10017 Village Marina by Land Use Company 2576 Sound Avenue Baiting Hollow,NY 1t933 includes: Nassau & Suffolk Counties. For information regarding any application notice in Region 1, contact the following: DEC Bldg. 40, SUNY Campus, Stony Brook, NY 11794 Suffolk County Health Dept., County Center, Riverhead, NY 11901 Nassau Co. Health Dept., 240 Old Country Rd., Mineola, NY 11501 The applicant proposes to dredge a 220 ft. by 365 ft. marine facility taa depth of five feet at mean Iow water using a barge with crane and clamshell; 5,000 cu. yds. of spoil will be removed by barge and disposed of in an upland area. Sediment analysis should be done before dredging takes place. The project is located on the southwesl corner of Waterfront Bird, and Beach Ave., Island Park, Town of Hempstead, Nassau County. NCTM 43-19-263 & 264. SHPA--2 Permit: Tidal Wetlands, Water Quality, and Protection of Waters UPA--t0-89-0437 CONTACT: Susan Ackerman The applicant proposes to construct above mean high water, 80 fi. of navy bulkhead and backfill with 25 cu. yds, clean upland fill, There is no dredging associated with this project. The project is located an Woadcleft Bay, Woadcleft Ave,, Freeport, Town of Hempstead, Nassau County. Permit: Tidal Wetlands, Protectien of Waters and Water Quality UPA--t0-89-0484 CONTACT: Marilyn E. Peterson The applicant proposes the renovation of an existing garage/apartment, and the construction of a 400 sq, ft. addition on sono tube piers. No excavation will be done except for piers and septic system. The addition will be 65 feet from Freshwater Wetlands, and the septic system will be approximately I00 feet from the wetland. The project is located on Fishers Island - Middle Farms Pond, Town of So~ut,hold, Suffolk County. SCTM 1000-003-7-5. SHPA--2 Permit: Freshwater Wetlands UPA--t0-89-0558 CONTACT: Susan Ackerman The applicant proposes the construction of a timber retaining wall and stairway in order to redesign lawn area and driveway. All improvements will occur in areas of existing lawn or existing ariveway. All driveway and parking areas will be constructed of permeable materials. No naturally vegetated areas will be disturbed during construction. The project is located on Fowler Street, Phillips Pond, Town of Southampton, Suffolk County. SCTM 904-30-1-60.002 SHPA--2 Permit: Freshwater Wetlands UPA--t0-89-0647 CONTACT: Susan Ackerman The applicant has revised plans previously noticed on 1/26/89, The applicant now proposes to remove existing 26 ft. by 36 ft. metal building and construct a 40 fi. by 60 fl, boat repair and storage building and an 8 fi. by 40 fi. equipment storage building at the Village Marine located at t 75 Bay Avenue, Maftituck. The proposed building location is 27 fi. landward of an existing bulkhead and requires a 48 ft. variance fro the regulated 75 ft. setback. The project is located in the Town af Southold, Suffolk County, SHPA--2 Permit: Tidal Wetlands UPA--t0-88-1869 CONTACT: Katy Murphy (51~751-7900 (516)548-3319 Ext. 568 (516)535.3313 Last Filing Date Office SEQR 6/t6/89 I 3B 6/16/89 t 3B 6/16/89 I 3B FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 May 10, 1989 Land Use Co. 2576 Sound Ave. Baiting Hollow, N.Y. 11933 Re: Application No. 10-88-122-3-15.1 - Village Marine Dear Ms. Esper: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on April 27, 1989 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Land Use Company on behalf of Village Marine applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated October 12, 1988, and WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on April 27, 1989 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Land Use Company ON BEHALF OF Village Marine BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED PERMISSION UNDER THE WETLAND ORDINANCE TO: Construct a 40' X 60' accessory building to be used for boat storage and services. Conditions for approval include installation of gutters and dr!rwells to prevent runoff into wetlands. This permit will expire two years from the date it is signed if work has not commenced by said date. Fees must be paid and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Please take notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees: Inspection Fee .................... $10.00 FAK:jas CC: Bldg. Dept. Conservation Advisory Council file Very truly yours, ~t"- ~-- ' /V /~\ Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees Land Use May 2, 1990 Town of Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 728 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Jill Re: Village Marine Application No. 10-88-122-3-15.1 Dear Jill: As per our telephone conversation yesterday, enclosed please find a check in the amount of $35.00 for the above referenced project. Kindly forward a permit to our office at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, Tanya Lachenmeyer TL/dm Enc. 2576Sound Avenue · Baiting Hollow, NewYo~ · 11933 (516) 727-2400 * FAX (516) 727-2605 SOUTHOLD TRUSTEES Issued To~ Date~~L~,/~ Address lT.f' ~1)/,,,fJ/~..., )~t ~'f'/r//~'. ~. THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISPLAYED DURING CONSTRUCTION TOWN TRUSTEES OFFICE,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL.: 765-1801 Board Of $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 10-8~T12Z-3r15.1 DATE:Apyil 28, !989 ISSUED TO .......~!~L~GE ,~At~I~E ............... Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of the State of New York, 189:3; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the State of New York 1952; and the Soufhold Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on Apr~ 27~ Z98c) 19 , and in consideration of the sum of $ paid by of ............................... N. Y. and subiect to the Terms and Conditions llsfed on the reverse side hereof, of Soufhold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Construct accessory building , 40' X 60' to be used for boat storage and service. Propety is located at 175 Bay Ave., Mattituck, N.Y. Roof gutters and drywells are to be installed toprevent runo£f, into wetlands. all in accordance with the detailed specificahons as presented in the originating application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the Board as of this date. October 24, 1990 Mr. Scott Harris Supervisor Town of Southold Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Harris: Not more than a couple of weeks ago, hundreds of people gathered in Southold at a meeting, the theme of which was: "WHERE IS SOUTHOLD HEADED?" About a week following this meeting a special report appeared in Sunday's Newsday entitled: "SAVE THE PECONICS" In between the meeting and the special newspaper report, to be specific, on Wednesday September 26th, the Southold Town Board of Appeals met to hear request for variances. If anyone attended the meeting they would learn first hand, WHERE SOUTHOLD IS HEADED and in addition would learn how a variance if granted would serve no better purpose than to Ruin the Peconics. /~ ~ ~ As I understand it, according to Application No. 3938, Village Marine of Mattituck wishes to expand a building that already has: Insufficient Northerly Insufficient Southerly Insufficient Easterly And Insufficient Westerly setbacks. In short, they wish to compound an already existing nonconforming structure. In addition, they would also like to construct a high and dry boat storage structure (boat rack) in an area of their property which would also result in insufficient Northerly, Southerly, Easterl~ and Westerly setbacks. If this is not enough, they would also like to get relief from the present parking requirements since here too, they presently cannot conform with existing regulations, as they apply to their current operations, before any expansion. Have you ever visited their Bay Avenue location? First of all it is situated on one of the busiest intersections in Mattituck, (Bay Avenue and the main road). Try to exit from bay Avenue and proceed on to the main road. You can count on about a 15 minute wait at the intersection. Also, the marina location is opposite a busy bank drive thru window and parking lot, it is next to the busiest self-service gas station between Riverhead and Orient and very close to other busy establishments particularly a delicatessen that caters strictly to motorists. To make matters worse, they are on a heavily traveled beach road (Bay Avenue). As you realize, residents and environmental groups were outraged when a request for a change in the number of required automobile parking spaces for marinas was sought at a Town board hearing on April 24, 1990. In addition, the request for a variance was made at a time when the N.F.E.C. is suing the town to prevent overdevelopment of our creeks and they contend that Village Marina's request is an attempt to sneak in the back door, before the suit is resolved. It was further noted that the total space in which this marina wishes to accomplish this is one-half acre and their site plan failed to include square footage of existing office/showroom structure and proposed boat rack as part of total square footage utilized. It can only be imaginative rather than real, that this would ever be permitted in the town of Southold, particularly at an already overcrowded heavily congested area on a creek recently closed to shell fishing. Very truly yours, cc:~Town Planning Board Rob Goldman North Fork Environmental Council Lydia Tortora The Traveler - Watchman Jeff Miller The Suffolk Times APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Board Attention: Valerie Scopaz, Planner James Dinizio, Chairman Pro Tem Board of Appeals October 24, 1990 Planning Board Letters of 9/21/90 and 10/2/90 Pending Site Plan - Village Marine SCTM #1000-122-3-15.1 With reference to the above application, please find attached the latest print of site plan showing 20 proposed parking spaces. As you may know, the hearing on this application has been continued until Thursday, November 1, 1990, and we ask your review as to whether or not the parking layout as shown on this plan is conforming under the requirements for site plans -- with the exception, of course, that the plan is nine parking spaces short of the code requirements. Please provide our office with your comments as early as possible, or in the alternative, please feel free to have a representative from your department attend the hearing. The hearing has been continued for 9:10 p.m. on 11/1/90. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOFF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 September 21, 1990 Carmine Grasso Glueckert and Wieber Architects 300 Wheeler Road - Suite 303 Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Village Marine SCTM#1000-122-3-15 Dear Mr. Grasso: The Planning Board has received your revised site plan dated August 8, 1990. The following changes must be made before the Planning Board can proceed: Parking for 29 cars must be shown on site, including two (2) handicapped parking spaces. The location and details of fencing (type and location)must be shown. Grading, including existing and proposed topography with two-foot contours (on site and two hundred (200) feet beyond the property line), together with spot locations for buildings must be shown. A drainage plan must be submitted showing drainage calculations and details of drainage structures. Accessory boat storage racks must be set back thirty five (35) feet from the front yard and twenty (20) feet from the side yard. In addition, the proposed building and boat storage racks must be seventy five (75) feet from the bulkhead on James Creek. Since this setback cannot be met on this property, an application for a variance must be made to the Board of Appeals. 6. Boat storage racks must be included in percent of lot coverage calculations. Page 2 Village Marine 7. Indicate height of boat storage racks. 8. Show location of curbing and curb cut on Bay Avenue. Show a concrete boat wash down pad with drainage in the center, including access for clean out. 10. Show the location and listing of landscaping, buffering and street trees, including type, material, size, quantity and location. 11. Indicate building elevations for all facades and floor plans for the proposed use of floor area. Proof of review by the Health Department is required. A permit from the Town Trustees is also required for this project. The Planning Board requests a copy of the application filed with the New York Department of Environmental Conservation. If you have any questions or wish to have a presubmission conference to resolve any issues before proceeding, please don't hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, RGK/hp cc: Dave Young Gerard P. Goehringer, Board of Appeals John M. Bredemeyer III, President, Trustees Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO~l~f L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals FROM: DATE Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairman~.~.~.~/. October 2, 1990 RE: Village Marine SCTM# 1000-122-3-15 The following is in response to your request for comments on Application No. 3938, Village Marine. The Planning Board is not in favor of granting the requested variances for insufficient setbacks and relief from parking and landscaping requirements. The Boards reason's for not being in favor are as follows: The property is over developed now. The requested relief from the requirement for twenty nine (29) parking spaces cannot be met with the seven (7) spaces shown on the proposed site plan. In addition, the proposed boat storage racks have not been included in either the lot coverage or parking calculations. Finally there is no landscaping on site. And none is proposed on the site plan. 'i TO GLUECKERT AND WlEBER · ARCHITECTS 300 Wheeler Road-Suite 303 HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788 (516) 234-4897 I WE ARE SENDING YOU ~Attached [] Under separate cover via E~ Shop drawings [] Copy of letter [~'Prints [] Change order ~f~[ J~' the following items: [] Plans [] Samples [] Specifications [] THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: [] For approval ~For your use ~As requested [] For review and comment [] FOR BIDS DUE [] Approved as submitted [] Resubmit___ [] Approved as noted [] Submit__ [] Returned for corrections [] Return [] copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints 19 __ [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS__ COPY TO Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 14, 1989 Carmine Grasso Glueckert and Wieber Architects 300 Wheeler Road - Suite 303 Hauppauge, NY 11788 RE: Village Marine SCTM ~1000-122-3-15 Dear Mr. Grasso: The Planning Board has received your proposal. The following changes must be made before the Planning Board can proceed: Ail existing floating docks must be shown on the map. (The map submitted shows four, an inspection of the property showed twelve docks). The bulkheading on James Creek must be shown on the map. The existing macadam paving must be shown on the map together with the blue stone area. The Suffolk County Tax Map Nuraber (SCTM#) and the zoning must be shown on the map. A grading and drainage plan must be submitted showing drainage calculations and details of drainage structures. The map must show the name and address of the person, firm or organization preparing the map, sealed with the applicable New York State license seal and signature. 7. The location and details of curb cuts, fencing (type and location), grading, including existing and proposed topography with two-foot contours ( on site and two hundred (200) feet beyond the property line.) Spot locations roi buildings must be shown also. The location and listing of landscaping, buffering and street trees, including type, material, size, quantity and location must be shown. Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing the proposed use of floor area must be shown. 10. Parking calculations must be shown on the map in accordance with the Town Code, Article XIX 100-190, 191 & 192 (one space per four boats in dry storage may be used.) 11. The proposed building must be seventy five (75) feet from the bulkhead on James Creek. The Planning Board requests a copy of the application filed with the New York Department of Environmental Conservation. If you have any questions or wish to have a presubmission conference to resolve any issues before proceeding, please don't hesitate to contact this office. --.-Very truly yours, ~i'rman cc: Dave Young Board of Appeals Town Trustees RK/jt NOV ~ 8 Igsg TO GLUECKERTAND WIEBER ARCH~ECTS 300 Wheeler Road- Suite 303 H^UPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788 (516) 234-4897 WE ARE SENDING YOU ,y~ Attached [] Under separate cover vial"~-~q(- I~.k'P~_.~:~the following items: [] Shop drawings [] Prints [] Plans [] Samples [] Specifications [] Copy of letter [] Change order [] COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ~ For approval [] For your use Lg As requested El For review and comment [] FOR BIDS DUE [] Approved as submitted [] Approved as noted [] Returned for corrections [] 19 [] Resubmit [] Submit [] Return copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: ~ If enclosures are not es noted, kindly notify us at once. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (S16) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 11, 1989 Carmine Grasso Glueckert & Wieber Architects 300 Wheeler Road - Suite 303 Hauppauge, NY 11788 RE: Village Marine SCTM #1000-122-3-15 Dear Mr. Grasso: As per the phone conversation with Jill Thorp of the Planning Board, enclosed please find a check for $250.00 and a building permit application to be submitted to the Building Department upon receipt of site plan approval. Upon reciept of the correct fee the Planning Board will review the site plan application. The Site Plan fee is one hundred and fifty dollars (150.00) plus two point five cents (2.5) per square foot of proposed building area. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, (',... i.~.,~,BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR ,~ CHAIRM3%N enc. jt TO GLUECKERT AND WIEBER ARCHITECTS 300 Wheeler Road- Suite 303 HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788 (516) 2344897 OCT iii ? WE ARE SENDING YOU ~r Attached [] Under separate cover via~the following items: [] Shop drawings *~('Prints [] Plans [] Samples [] Specifications [] Copy of letter [] Change order [] COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ~ For approval [] For your use [] As requested [] For review and comment [] FOR BIDS DUE [] Approved as submitted [] Resubmit [] Approved as noted [] Submit [] Returned for corrections [] Return [] copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints 19 [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40--SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11794 (516) 751-7900 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner Mr. Charles Bowman Land Use Co. 2576 Sound Ave. Ba~cing Hollow, NY 11933 June 27, 1989 JUL - 6 1989 Re: Village Marine 10-88-1869 Dear Mr. Bowman: In response to Notice of Complete Application, the Town of Southold Planning Board has informed me they have not received a site plan application for this project, which is required for them to comment on the proposed building and variance. Submit all required plans to the Town Planning Board so we may proceed with our review. cc:~f. G. Kassner, Town of Southold F. Mushacke file Sincerely, Kathy Murphy Environmental Analyst Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) '/65-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 19, 1989 Katy Murphy Building 40, Room 219 State University of New York Stony Brook, New York 11794 RE: Village Marina Mattltuck, N.Y. SCTM ~ 1000-122-03-15.1 Dear Ms. Murphy, The Planning Board is unable to comment on the proposed building and variance because it has not received a site plan application for the above-referenced project. Site plan approval is required for the construction of a building within a marina, and for the proposed grading and drainage. Upon receipt of a complete application, the Planning Board will do a coordinated environmental review of the project, then forward its comments to your office. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact ~his office ....... Orlowski, Ben ett Chairman cc: Frank A. Kujawski, Jr., Board of Trustees James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney Victor Lessard, Building Department Village Marina FAX COVER SHEET TO: FROM: DATE: / / / Pages to follow: Additional Comments: IF ALL PACES ARE NOT RECEIVED. PLEASE CALL SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL at 765-1800 ,, Y;// ' i' : i R_E_QUIRE_~4~E__N._T_S.__.F~O~ SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION i'[SECTION-BLOCK-LOT TAX MAP NUMBERS ~'J. iNAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER OF RECORD '"-4 'NAME & ADDRESS OF PERSON PREIARINu~ ~ MAP ~'~/~.iDATE, NORTH POINT AND WRITTEN & GRAPHIC SCALE DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY & INFORMATION TO DEFINE BOUNDARIES 'i LOCATIONS, .! ~ iLOCATION & NAMES & EXISTING WIDTHS OF ADJACENT STREETS & CURBS OWNERS OF ALLAD3OINING LANDS, AS SHOWN ON TAX RECORDS PURPOSE OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS ~, LOCATION & ~COMPLETE OUTLINE OF EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS APPLYING TO PROPERTY i i EXISTING ZONING 'AREAS SUBJECT TO FLOODING OR STOPES4 WATER OVERFLOWS .WATER COURSES, MARSHES, WOODED AREAS, TREES 8" IN DIAMETER OR MORE ANY BUILDING WITHIN 100' OF PROPERTY PAVED AREAS, SIDEWALKS, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO PUBLIC STREETS iEXISTING SEWERS, CULVERTS, WATERLINES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO PROPERTY 'IFENCING LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING PROPOSED BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING AREAS NOV 5 ~ii~.AUT H 0 ~ NNIk~ OUTDOOR LIGHTING OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS OUTDOOR SIGNS- 239K SIDEWALKS LOCATIONS WIDTHS: SIZE OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ,, ~ '~ -~~ ,/, ~~ ~~ N/O/F LAND ~ ' ,,~,~ :,, :' ~. ( ',. *~*'' I .. , ff , e**' .. , ,, '. : , . ,. -, , , , ~ ~ ,;~,[,... ... ~,,.- ,".., .,-.,. , ... ~,~ , .:,, , . ., , - .., : ' :" - .. ~. .. · : .,, .',~ , . - .. ,,..' ~, ~ ~ ~,~.'~.,. ~ ~,:~, ~ r~ ~'' , ~ .... ~ -,~~' ,.~., " '"' ~ ~ ~N~-" : DAVID' $TRONG D LL&H ~ ' ;- ,' : . ',, ' · . -- DAVID S, STRONG , ¢: - - ..... $,"~ ' .- . 'T~v~a'r .-" : · " ' LOT NO,~.~-- OWNED BY' '" ~ ' '"" - '.'~ TOWN ~ S~T~ t I , ' ' DAV{D ~ S~O~ ~ JEFFERY ~T~N6~ N/O/:F WILLI~ d. TUFA.NO . ,~. ~ ~ ~' ~* ,~ .... , ~' , , ,~" , , ' ~ ~ - 475 // BORING No. 1 DATE~ 9/2I/I9 SURFACE ELEVA~'tON: 10 .......... ~ 3 BORING 'No. 2 i L ........ X llis .~,-! "z~*'~'~, ...I.I.K~.Y tdAF AUG 3 0 1990 I