Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-121.-5-8 TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLI} .... Suffolk Counly, New York 516- 7654.0, N? 26!69' .Sot, thold, N. Y. 11971__~19 ~dilh T. Terry, Town Clerk ~.LDEN W. YOUNG YOUNG ~ YOUNG 400 OSTR~NDER ~,VENUE RIVERHE~,D, NEW YORK ~o~ HOWARD W. YOUNG Lem~ $~o= Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold,N.Y. 11971 Attn: Ms. Valerie Scopaz March 3, 1988 Re: A.T. Holding Corp. Sound Avenue Laurel, T/O Southold,N.Y. Dear Valerie: Enclosed herewith are 14 prints of the above captioned subdivision sketch plan, the Environmental Assessment - Part 1 and the Application for Approval of Plat. Mr. Irving Tepper or William Esseks,Esq. will forward the subdivision application fee in the amount of $ 10.200.00 ( ten thousand two hundred dollars ) in the near future. Please place this matter on the Planning Boards agenda at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, Howard W. Young HWYt~ cc: William Esseks, Esq. APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of tile Towu of Southold: The undersigued applicaut hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance xvith Article 16 of the Town I,aw and the Rules and Regulations of the $outln~hl Town Planuing Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land uuder application. (If tile applicant is not tile owner of record of the land under apl)licatioo, the applicaut shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be ....~.:T:..~.q!~t.i.n.~..Cg.r.~.: .......................... 3. The entire land under applicatiou is described in Schednle "A" hereto aunexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. Tile laud is held by tile applicant under deeds recorded in Suffollc Cotl~'~ty Clerk's office as folloxvs: Liber .... '[.Q0..2.7 ............... Page ...[9~. ............... Ou ...0.~./.0.'1.,(.8.6 ........... ; nil, er .... .fiSl ............... Page ................ ........... : Liber .....6.~1.6 ............... Page ...~JJ~. ............... On ...0..3[.0.~[~.9 ........... ; Liber ........................ Page ...................... Oil ....................... ; l,iber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; as devised under tile Last \Viii and Testament ~}[ ....................................... or as distributee ....................................................................... 5. The area of the land is .... 9J'...5~TJ ...... acres. 6. All taxes xvhich are lieus on the land at the date hereof have been paid except ............ 7. The land is encumbered by ............................................................. mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded ill l,iber .............. Page .................. in original amount of'$ .............. uupaid ammmt $ .................... hehl by.. ..................... .............. address ................................................................ (b) Mortgage recorded in l,iher ......... I'agc ....................... itl original anmunt of .............. unpaid alnmmt $.~.' ................... held by . ..................... .............. address ' (c) Mortgage recorded in Lil)er .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... ...................... address ......................................................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ........................ 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts ....................................... 10. No part of tile land lies trader water whether tide xvater, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept ................................................................................... I1. The applicant shall at his expe,,se install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Sul)ply District. Name o£ Dis. trict, if within a District, is .............................................................. 13. Water mains will be laid by ........................................................... and (a) (no) charge will be nlade for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ......................................... ..................................... al~d (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by .. ........................................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made lot installing said mains. 16. If streets shoxvn o~ tile plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County lIighxvay system, amlex Schedole "IV' hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing pnblic streets in the Town of Southold llighxvay system, annex F;chcdulc "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures ()il the land which are In)t located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows p;'oposcd streets which arc extensions ~,( streets on adjoining sub- division malls heretofore filed, there arc ~to reserve strips ;it the elld cfi the streets ollt said existing maps at their conjunctions with the propt~sed streets. 20. In the course ol these proceedings, the :lpl)llc;t~t will ~dfcr pr~tfl' of tith: :is required by Sec. 335 ~f the Real ?rol)erty l.aw. 21. Sllbmit a copy of proposed deed for lots showi:l:.., all restricti,ms, covenants, etc. Alltlcx .qchedule "D'. 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of gradiug and required lmblic improvements will be $ .......... as itemized in Scbedule "E" hereto anoexed and reqnests that the matnrity of the Performance Bond be fixed at .............. years. The Performance Bond will be xvritten by a licensed surety company unless otberxvise shown on Schednle "F". DATE ....~OF.qt}. 3 ............ ....... 19.8.~3. .. ~gEa. r. ~I. ~-.. ¥gP.q~. 7..k.a.n..cf..S.q Cy.ey.q r' ........ (Name of (Signature aud Title) · ·409..Q.s.tr.a. qd..er..6v..e...,.. ~. i y.e.r.h..e .a.d.,...U..y.... ! J 901 (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OV ................................ , ss: On the .................. day of ............................. , 19 ....... before me persoually came ............................................ to me known to he the individoal described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ............ executed tile same. Notary Public STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ............................ ss: Ou the ................ day ............ of .............. , 19 ...... , before me personally came ..................... to me Immvn, who heing by me doly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No .................................................... ............................... that .......................... is the .......... tile c~rpm:atiou described in and which executed tht' fm-eguing iustrument;~that ............ knows the seal of said corporatinn: that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. ~tml Ih:it ............ signed .............. nan~e thereto by like order. Notary Public TOI~N OF SOUTttOLD EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT :'PART I Project Infor~tion HOTICE: This dOCUment ~ desk,ned to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a signific effect on the eiiv(rc°,.~nt. Please como leto the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be cons as part of the a~olication for approval and may be subject to further verification and ~ublic review. Prov any additional ~nformation you believe will be needed to comolete PARTS 2 and 3. )t is exoecteo tn~t comoloticn of the EAR will be deoendent on information currentTy available and will not involve new studies, research or investiqation. If information requiring such additional wor~ is unavai~ble, so indicate and soeoify each instance. NAME OP PROJECT: A.T. Holding 'Corp. AND N~HE OF APPLICANT: A.T. Holding Corp. (Name) Sound Avenue '(Street) Laurel, New York 11948 (P.O.) -- ~ (State) (Zip) NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Diff_~rent) Mr. Michael Abramoff & Mr. Irving Tepper ~7o William Esseks, Es~' (Hame) 108 East Main~Street, PO Box 279 (S~reet) Riverhead, New York 11901 BUSiness PHONE: (516) 369-1700 DEscqIPTIDN OK PmOJECT~ (Briefly describe type of project or action) Realty Subdivision (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate M.A. if not applicable) SITE DESCRIPTION {Physical settin~ of overall project, both develoned and undevelooed areas) . C~eral character of the land: r~nerally uniform slope__ Generally uneven and rollin~ or trreg Present land use: Uroan, Industrial .I , Commercial __, Suburban ., Rural X ., For ., Agriculture __, Other 91 · 5acres. Total acreage of oroject area: __ Aooroximate acreage: Presently After Completion Presently After .rom Meadow or Brushland 22.5 acres 0 acres Ilater Surface Area 0 acres _0 Ft)~end Woodland 56acres 36.4acres Unveget~ced (rock, 5.0 0 earth or fi1)) acres pa, ~. ~r c.C.L.) 0 .acres ~ acres Roads, buildinns and other ~aved 8.0 7.0 surfaces 0 acres 11. acres acres Other (indicate ty~e) -- acres '37. Lawns & Landscap6d '~rat I~ ~edomin~nt soil tye~(S) on nfo!oct site? l~=~$4o.v~.~$ymou.tJa.~DcLs_ N/A 6. A;proxi~te percentaoe of proposed Project site with slooes: 0-10% 75 ,,; 1~-)~% 20 %; 15= or greater - 5 %. ' 7. Is project contiguous ~o oar contain a buildinn or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? Yes __ 8. What is the depth to the water table? 2-36 feet g. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes X NO lO. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or ?danoered . .Yes X ~lo, according to ~ Identify each species 11. Are there any unique or Vpusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes~other geological formations . - Yes ~A No. {Describe 12. Is the project sitexPresently used by the con~'~unity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area - Yes Ho. 13. Does the pre~ent site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the corrtnunity? Yes A NO 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A · a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary 15. bakes, Ponds, ~etland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Ilame Unnamed Wetlands : b. Size (in acres) ~.0 acr~ 16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project {e.g. single family residential, R-2) and the scale of deve)opment (e.g. 2 story). B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage deve)oped: 91.5 acres initially; 91-5 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remainundeveloped 43.4 d. Length of project, in miles: N%A (if appropriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate p~rcent of expansion proposed: age ; developed acreage - N/A f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed_~68 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~ (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial 34 Ultimate 34 building square foot- Estimated Emo)oyment Industrial J. Total height of tal)est nronosed structure -_~ _..feet. -2- 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site - 0 tons cubic yar 3. How many acres of veqetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)~ill be removed from site - 19-~crJs. Portion of cleared areas wil! be revegetated. 4. Will any mature forest {over lO0 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by th~s project? Yes X No 5. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? X ~es 6. If single Dbase project: Anticipated period of construction 60 months, (inCluding demolition). 7. If mu ti-phased project: a. Total number of phases anticipated No. b. Anticipated date of co~encement phase demolition) Approximate completion date final phase month ?ear (including month, year. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subseouent phases? Yes Will blasting occur during construction? Yes X No N~,~ber of jobs generated: during construction 30 ; after project is complete 0 Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 , Yes X No. 10. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? __ If yes, explain: 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes X No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) N/A C. )f surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13. Will surface area of existing lakes,, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? Yes A No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? Yes X No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? X Yes No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disoosal facility be used? X Yes No C. If yes, give name: T/O SOUthold : location Cutchoque d. :lill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal System~)r into a sanitary landfill? __Yes X 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? X Yes No (On Lawns) r' 17. Will project routinely produce odors {more than one hour per day}? Yes X NO 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes X No 19. Will project result in an increase in energy use? X Yes NO. If yes. indicate type(s) ~ Electric 20. If water supply is from wells indicate Pumping capacity 21. Total anticinated water usage per day ]~2.00 gals/day. 22. Zoning: gals/minute. llhat Is domlnant zoning classification of site? ~ Reqident .- Agriculture b, Current specific zoning classification of site A Resident - Agriculture d. If no, indicate desired Zor)nQ __~ ............ 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? Yes X No b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? C. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required (Yes, No) (Type) Submittal (Date) No Approval (Date) City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Heal th DeQartment Other local agencies CA~ . Other regional agencies~,C.Plannln§ State Agencies N.Y.S. DEC Federal Agencies C. INF0~UATIONAL DETAILS Yes ~ivision ~t.~nos'.' ~'~'- ::~UDalViSion Yes Wetlands Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be REPRESENTING: A.T. Holdinq Co p. DATE: September 3, 1987 -4- Z -%. E$$EK$, HEFTER ~. ANGEL IO8 EAST MAIN STREET October 14, 1987 WATER MILL OFFICE MONTAUK HIGHWAY Ms. Valerie Scopaz Town Planner Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: A.T. Holding Corp. Laurel, T/O Southold, New York Dear Ms. Scopaz: I met with you on September 10, 1987 concerning the above. My client has asked me for a status of their preliminary application. I would like to meet with you on October 29, 1987 to discuss this matter with you. Would you be so kind as to indicate your availability on October 29, 19877 Very truly yours, William W. Esseks WWE:cf TO: FROM: RE: DATE: i.FILE Vale~ie Scopaz, Town Planner MEMORANDUM Continued David T. Ross Deputy Executive Director SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 November 1, 1989 (516)589-5200 Fax No.: (516) 589-5268 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: In reply to your inquiry on the status of the Laurel Lake area, I am happy to report that approximately three weeks ago we issued purchase orders to two appraisers and the appraiser's efforts are now under way. Unfortunately, we wer~ delayed due to the problem of locating appraisers who didn't imv£ ~ ~ested interest in the vicinity. I have directed our personnel who work with the appraisers to determine their progress and I should have an estimated time of completion later this week. I am also happy to report that our activities to determine water quality and quantity at the Mill Lane site is moving forward. Our driller started boring activities on October 30, and within two weeks we should have a drilling log that would indicate formation characteristics. At that time, we will select various well depths for test pumping to determine quality and quantity. Representatives from our Watershed Oversight Protection area and I are meeting some of your technical people on Wednesday, November 8, 1989. At that time, I will provide an update on Laurel Lake area. If I can be of any other assistance, p/le~se call. S~ncer~ly[~ yo~ ,\ / avid T. Ross DTR:mk cc: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planne~ SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Michael A. LoGrande, Chairman Matthew B. Kondenar, Secretar~ Melvin M. Fritz, M.D., Member James T.B. Tripp, Member Eric J. Russo, Member Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 (516) 589-5200 Fax No.: (516) 589-0358 January l4, 1993 Town of Southold Board of Assessors 3095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Acquisition of Property from NFB Development Corp. located in Laurel, New York Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed is a Certificate of Exemption pertaining to property recently acquired by the Suffolk County Water Authority to be noted and filed with the records of your office. A copy of this letter, together with surveys, is being sent to the Planning Board with the request that it mark its records accordingly. Very truly yours, SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY L. Van Nostrand, Jr. Counsel GMB/KMA I'- ,% /b?,4 /P .S, T2 OPE,...¢ T'W ,lAN DEPARTMENT OF LAW DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE August 27, 1991 ~I~;OUNTY Of SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HalPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE KEVIN S. LAW DIRECTOR Sherry Johnson, Program Coordinator North Fork Environmental Council Route 25 at Love Lane P.O. Box 799 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Laurel Lake._~j~_ Thank you for your recent letter inquiring about the acquisition status of Laurel Lake in the Town of Southold. Please be aware that the Suffolk County Park Trustees voted on and approved for inclusion in the Water Protection Program the area designated as Laurel Lake. One of the parcels in that area is that of the A. T. Holding Co. We have ordered an appraisal on this parcel and, as soon as we are in receipt of a reviewed appraisal, we will be contacting the owners to discuss the possible sale of this property. Thanks again for your continued support and interest in County Executive Halpin's land preservation efforts. Very truly yours, ~Kevin S. Law Director of Real Estate / KSL:PMH:cs Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 6, 1989 James Geraghty Victorian Realty Corp. 110 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 Re: Letter of September 20, 1989 regarding A.T. Holding Co. property. SCTM ~ 1000-121-5-18 Dear Mr. Geraghty, The Planning Board has reviewed your letter, in which you request a meeting with a client to discuss the mining of the A.T. Holding Co. property, east of Laurel Lake, Mattituck. The Planning Board feels that mining and filling of land within the Town's groundwater recharge area would be an inappropriate land use. Consequently, it is not interested in ~further discussions with your client. Very Truly Yours, Chairman CC: Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor Members of the Town Board Arthur Kunz, Director, Suffolk County Planning Dept. Sarah Meyland, Suffolk County Water Authority REALTOR VICTORIAN REALTY com. Full Service Real Estate" September 20, 1989 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. c/o Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: I am contacting you regarding a 94 acre parcel located South of Rt. 48 in Matt/tuck. Recently my wife, Donna Geraghty, ~as inquired about filling in the sand pit with construction debris and you responded that the town was not interested in that project. I have a different client that would like to meet with the planning board to discuss a project to further mine the existing sand pits and fill it with clean fill approved by the D.E.C. My clients are very interested in working with the town in any way possible which could also include donating land back to the town. Before you make any decisions, we would like you to see samples of the materials and hear our entire proposal. This material is not construction debris and would not be hazardous to the ground water. I look forward to hearing from you in the near future. Very Truly Y~urs, Greenpor t Manager OG:kab 110 Front Street · Greenport, NY 11944 · (516) 477-2730 Mushroom Meadows · Main Road, P.O. Box 601 · Aquebogue, NY 11931 · (516) 722-3100 · Fax (516)722-3224 Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 6, 1989 William Esseks,Esq. Esseks, Hefter & Angel P.O. Box279 Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Application of A.T.Holding Company SCTM ~ 1000-121-5-5.1 Dear Mr. Esseks, There has been no response to the Planning Board's certified letters of June 6, 1989 and August 18, 1989, regarding the preparation of a draft environmental impact statement. Accordingly, the A.T. Holding Co. application file is considered to be closed. If at some point in the future, your client wishes to subdivide his property, he will have to reapply at that time. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very Truly Yours,. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney CERTIFIED MAIL To: FROM: RE: All Involved Applicants Mr~ Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Scoping Outline for the DEIS on Peconic Homes SCTM $1000-121-5-5.1 Douglas Miller SCTM ~1000-!21-4-10o! DanielJacoby SCTM $1000-125-1-5 Joseph Macari SCTM #1000-121-4-9 A.T. Holding SCTM ~1000-121-5-8 DATE: August 18, 1989 Enclosed please find the scoping outline for the above referenced projects. The attached document constituts the outline of what must be addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact for the above referenced actions. All actions must be addressed in one comprehensive document, as outlined herein, due to the potential for cumulative impacts. As this DEIS is to address five projects in a cumulative manner, it is imperative that we receive an indication as to your intentions of completing this document. Accordingly, we are requesting verification of your intent, in the form of a certified letter, indicating whether or not you intend to pursue the individual application referenced above and if you are going to participate inthe preparation of the comprehensive DEIS. Please forward your responses by certified mail, in order to ensure the most efficient handling of the correspondence. We must receive your response by September 1t 1989t or we wi]] assume that you do not wish to exercise the option of preparing the DEIS and this agency shall terminate review of your project in conformance with 6 NYCRR Part 617.8(a). Please contact the office if there is any questions with the above. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SCOPING OUTLINE for the Laurel Lake Study Area Southold, New York INTRODUCTION: This document was compiled using the Scoping Checklist contained within 6 WYCRR Part 617.21 Appendix D, and as a result of a scoping meeting held July 13, 1988 at the To~n of' Southold Town Hall for the following actions: Peconic Homes Douglas Miller Daniel Joseph Macari A.T. Holding' Co. SCTM #1000-121-5-5.i SCTM #1000-121-4-10.1 SCT3! #1000-125-1-5 SCTM #1000-121-4-9 SCT~¥ #1000-121-5-5.~ The purpose of this document is ~o idencif'y the basic' topic areas which must be addressed in the DEIS. Topics which require detaiied discussion are so note<]. Tbi~ document will be tlsed, in conjunction with Part d~7..~ review the proposed DEIS with regard to scope and ac'eqt~acy the time if submission to the lead agency, in ~ddi~_ion, the action includes five projects, with potential cumulative effects, relevant sections of Part 617.15 wiil aisc be utilized in the review. For the purposes of this scoping document che area containing the five above actions will be referred ~o as project site" and the five actions w~!i he referred as project". It is recognized that a significant amount information may have already been compiled, in counection with one or more of the actions. It is advisable utilize this information and expand on it, where appropriate, to adequately address the potential ~mpacts. The information must be presented in a single comprehensive documen~ For the purposes of fulfilling the rules and regulations of SEQR conjunction with this positive declaration. CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page I of !3 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area SCOPING OUTLINE: I. Cover Sheet The ElS shall begin with a cover sheet that A. B. C. D. includes:. That this is a draft statement Name or other descriptive titles of the project Location (county and town) of the project Name and address of the lead agency which required preparation of the statement and the name and telephone number of a person at the agency to be contacted for further information Name and address of the preparers of any portion of the statement and a contact name and telephone number Date of acceptance of the Draft EIS In the case of a Draft EIS, the deadline date by which comments are due should be indicated II. Table of Contents and Summary A table of contents and a brief summary are required for Draft EIS and Final EIS's. The summary should include: A. Brief d~scription of the actions and project as a whole. B. Significant, beneficial and adverse impacts, (issues of controversy must be specified) C. Mitigation measures proposed D. Alternative(s) considered E. Matters to be decided (permits, approvals, funding) III. Description of the Proposed Action Ao PROJECT PURPOSE, 1. 2. NEED AND BENEFITS Background and history Public need for the project, and municipality objectives based on adopted community developments plans Objectives of the project sponsors Benefits of the proposed action a) social b) economic LOCATION t. Establish geographic boundaries of the project (use of regional and local scale maps is CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page Z of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area D4 recommended) Description of access to site Description of existing zoning of site DESIGN AND LAYOUT 1. Composite map of pending actions a) proposed layouts b) Suffolk Cty. Tax Map No's. 2. Estimated site data a) proposed impervious surface area (roofs parking lots, roads) b) amount of land to be cleared c) open space Structures, proposed number and layout Proposed drainage systems Sewage Disposal Water Supply 4. 5. 6. CONSTRUCTION 1. Construction a) total construction period anticipated b) schedule of construction c) ftlture potential development, on site(~ or on adjoining properties d) Suggested protection methods APPROVALS 1. Required changes or variances to regulations Other permit approval or funding including but not limited to: Town - County State the zoning requirements IV. Environmental Setting Natural Resource A. GEOLOGY 1. Surface a) List of soil types b) discussion of soil characteristics examples: - physical properties (indication of soils capabilities and or limitations) c) agricultural soil properties - list soils by name, slope and so,ii CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 3 of Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area group ranking within NYS Land (1NYCRR 370) - number of acres within each group d) distribution of soil types at project site - location of soils on map e) suitability for use examples: - agriculture - recreation - construction f) subsoil discussion Topography a) description of topography at project site examples: - slopes - prominent or unique features b) slope analysis (example; 0-10%, 10-20%, >20%) c) description of existing drainage areas, patterns and channels WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater (detailed discussion) a) location and description of aquifers and recharge areas examples: - depth of water table - seasonal variation - quality - quantity - direction & velocity of flow b) identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater examples: location of existing wells public/private water supply industrial uses agricultural uses c) studies and reports Special Groundwater Protection Area (LIRPB) - Water Advisory Committee of the Town of Southold - North Fork Water Supply Study Surface water b) identification of uses and level of use of all surface waters d) discussion of potential for flooding, siltation, erosion and eutrophication of CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 4 of 13 S¢oF ing Outline Laurel Lake Study Acea water supply TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1. Vegetation (detailed discussion) a) list vegetation types on the pro,jec~ site and within the surrounding area b) discussion of site vegetation characteristics examples: - species presence and abundance - age - size - distribution dominance community types unique, rare and endangered species value as habitat for wildlife productivity 2. Wildlife (detailed discussion) a) list of wildlife species on the projecli site and within surrounding area, including migratory and resident species b) discussion of wildlife population characteristics examples: species presence and abundance - distribution - dominance - unique, rare and endangered species - productivity Wetlands (detailed discussion) a) list and map wetland areas within or contiguous to the project site b) discuss wetland characteristics examples: - acreage - vegetative cover - classification - benefits of wetland such as £]ood and erosion control, recreation c) location and description of surface waters located on project site or those that may be influenced by the proOect examples: seasonal variation quantity classification according to New State Department of Health (if appropriate) CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 5 of Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area d) discussion of potential for flooding, siltation, erosion and eutrophication Human Resources TRANSPORTATION 1. Transporting a professional traffic engineer) a) description of the size, capacity and condition of services examples: - roads - intersections - traffic control - access/egress from site b) and services (detailed discussion by use description of current level of of services examples: - a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic flow - vehicle mix - source of existing traffic - accident history - capacity analysis LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Ex~sting land use a) b) Land a) b) c) and zoning description of the existing land use of the project site and the surrounding area site within a quarter of a mile of the examples: - commercial - residential - agricultural - business - retail - industrial - vacant description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area use plans (detailed discussion) description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area discussion of future development trends or pressures plans to be discussed, but not limited to: Town Master Plan 208 Study CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 6 of 13 Scoping ()uti Laurel Lake Study Area NURPS North Fork Water Supply Suffolk County Water Authority COMMUNITY SERVICE (for this section include a l~st of existing facilities and a discussion of existing levels of usage and projected future needs) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Educational facilities Police protection Fire protection Health care facilities Social services Recreational facilities Utilities Public water supply Solid waste disposal DEMOGRAPHY 1. Population characteristics a) discussion of existing population parameters examples: -distribution - density - household size and composition b) discussion of projections for population growth CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual resources a) description of the physical character of the community b) description of natural areas/land use patterns of local visual importance. 2. Historic and archaeological resources a) location and description of historic areas or structures listed on State or National Register or designated by the community, or included on Statewide Inventory b) identification of sites having potentia~ significant archaeological value include results of cultural resource survey; te be conducted by qualified archaeologis! . SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Identify those aspects of the environmental setting irt CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 7 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area Section IV that may be adversely or beneficially affected by the proposed action and require discussion. The following is a summary of some impacts which maybe potentially large. This list is not meant to be all inclusive, nor is it true that all of these impacts may occur with the proposed project: PHYSICAL CHANGE TO THE PROJECT SITE. 1. impact on soils and topography AFFECT ON GROUNDWATER 1. adverse affect to groundwater a) water quality b) water quantity/availability c) conformance to plans and regulations THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES 1. reduction of species found on State or Federal list (if applicable) 2. loss of habitat and resultant impact on specie NON-THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES 1. interference with residence or migratory 2. loss of habitat E. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS 1. level of service 2. capacity analysis 3. physical factors - curvature - site distance 4. access and safety COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. availability of services 2. projected demand LAND USE PLANS 1. compatibility/conformance 2. existing land use patterns CULTURAL 1. historic 2. pre-historic 3. visual and open space VI. MITIGATION MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 8 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area Describe measures to reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts identified in Section V. The following is a brief listing of typical measures used for some of the major areas of impact. Natural Resource A. GEOLOGY 1. Surface a) use topsoil stockpiled during construction for restoration arid landscaping b) minimize disturbance of non-construction sites c) design and implement soil erosion control plan Topography a) avoid construction on areas of steep slope b) design adequate soil erosion devices to protect areas of steep slope c) minimize disturbance of non-construction sites WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater a) locations of sanitary discharge b) maintain permeable areas on the site c) landscaping and landscape managemen5 plans d) stormwater controls 2. Surface water a) ensure use of soil erosion control techniques during construction and operation to avoid siltation examples: - hay bales - temporary restoration of vegetation to disturbed areas landscaping b) design adequate stormwater control system c) restrict use of salt or sand for road and parking area snow removal d) avoid direct discharges to surface water· resources TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1. Vegetation a) restrict clearing to only those areas necessary CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 9 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area b) preserve part of site as a natural area c) after construction, landscape site.with naturally occurring vegetation d) purchase open space at another location and dedicate to local government or conservation organization Wildlife a) provide adequate habitat (shelter and food) for remaining wildlife species b) schedule construction to avoid sensitive periods of wildlife cycles c) wildlife plantings to restore and/or create habitats Human Resources TRANSPORTATION 1. Transportation a) design adequate and safe access to project site to handle projected traffic flow b) install adequate traffic control devices or roadway configurations Bo LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Existing land use and zoning a) design project to comply with existing land use plans and studies b) design functional and visually appealing facility to set standard and precedent for future surrounding land use COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. Police protection a) provide equipment, funds, or services directly to the community 2. Fire protection a) provide equipment, funds or services directly to the community 3. Utilities a) install utility services underground b) incorporate water saving fixtures into facility design c) incorporate energy-saving measures into facility design CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual resources .CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 10 of 13 Scoping ()utiJne Laurel Lake Study Area a) minimize visual impact through thoughtful and innovative design b) design landscaping to be vzsuaiiy pleasing and to serve as a buffer between surrounding land uses c) preservation of existing vegetation Historic and archaeological resources a) Prepare a plan, including measures mitigate impacts to historic/ archaeological resources through data recovery, avoidance and/or restrictio, of project activities b) develop measures to convey cultural information to the community through scientific/popular reports, displays) c) preserve architecturally significant structures and make an adequate permanent photographic and statistical record of those that ~nust be destroyed VII. ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF TIlE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED Identify those adverse environmental effects is Section " that can be expected to occur regardless of the mitigation !leasures considered in Section VI. VII. ALTERNATIVES This section contains categories of alternatives wlth examples. Discussion of each alternative should be at a level sufficient to permit a comparative assessment of costs, benefits and environmental risks for each alternative. It is not acceptable to make simple assertions that a particular alternative is or is not feasible. Identify those categories of alternatives which should be included in the EIS by placing a check in the box located to the left of the topic. ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGIES (detailed discussion, can be comtined with VII-B be]ow) 1. Site layout a) density and location of structures b) location of access routes, parking and utility routes 2 . Orientation a} compatibility with slope and drainage CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 11 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area patterns b) site size and set back requirements Technology a) pollution control equipment b) innovative vs. proven technologies Mix of activities a) townhouses b) large lots ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT(S) (discussions and maps; maps can be conceptual in nature but should provide sufficient detail in order to assess potential impacts and/or desirability of alternative layouts) 1. Limiting factors a) b) c) d) e) availability of land suitability of alternative layout to accommodate design requirements suitable market area compatibility with local zoning and master plan compatibility with regional objectives ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION/OPERATION SCHEDULING 1. Commence construction at a different time 2. Phase construction/operation 3. Restrict construction/operation work schedule NO ACTION 1. Impacts of no action a) effect on public need b) effect on private developers' need c) beneficial or adverse environmental impacts Public acquisition of portion and/or total area, a) public need b) public benefit/impact c) environmental need/benefit/impact IX. IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES Identify those natural and human resources listed in Section IV that will be consumed, converted or made unavailable for future use. X. GROWTH INDUCING ASPECTS ~ "',~% CRAMER, VOORHIS &' SOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAI.~,_AND, ~!.~'I~NiNG CONSULTANTS ---~--~ 'v;~'// ,,,,,,\ Page 12 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area Describe in this section the potential growth aspects the proposed project may have, Listed below are examples of topics that are typically affected by the growth induced by a project. POPULATION 1, Increases in resident population due to construction of housing the SUPPORT FACILITIES 1. Business and community service demand to serve the increased population crea~ed DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 1. Introduction or improvement of infrastructure (roads, waste disposal, sewers, water) to service proposed project 2. Creation of further growth potential by construction of improved infrastructure XI. APPENDICES Following is a list of materials typically used support of the EIS. A. List of underlying studies, reports and information considered and relied on in preparing the statement agencies, consulted List all federal, state, regional, or local organizations, consultants and private persons in preparing the statement Technical exhibits (if any) at a legible scale D. Relevant correspondence regarding the projects be included (required in the Final EIS) may CRAMER, vooRHIS &,,ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAl[AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 13 of 13 Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jl2ne 6 · 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL William Esseks Esseks, Hefter & Angel P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: A.T. Holding Co. SCTM ~1000-121-5-5.1 Dear Mr. Esseks: As per the phone conversation of July 6, 1989, between Jean of your office and Jill of the Planning Board office, it is understood that neither you nor a representative will be attending the Scoping Session which is set for Thursday· July 13, 1989 at 2 p.m. Further it is understood that you would not attend the Scoping Session regardless of which date was chosen. Inasmuch as the Planning Board has not received a response to their correspondence of April 13· 1989 (copy enclosed) and that the Planning Board has been notified verbally that there will be no one representing A.T. Holding Co. at the July 13, 1989 Scoping Session, the Planning Board will consider the application of A.T. Holding Co. withdrawn u~less otherwise notified by the date of the Scoping Session. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. enc. CC: James Schondebare V~ruly yours, ~ __ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 CERTIFIED MAIL TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Ail Involved Applicants Southold Town Planning Board Scoping Session for: Peconic Homes SCTM 91000-121-5-5.1 Douglas Miller SCTM ~1000-121-4-10.1 Daniel Jacoby SCTM 91000-125-1-5 Joseph Macari SCTM ~1000-121-4-9. A.T. Holding Co. SCTM ~1000-121-5-5.1 July 6, 1989 This is to confirm the 13, 1989 at 2 p.m. for applications. Scoping Session date of Thursday, July the above mentioned subdivision The Scoping Session will be held in the Meeting Hall of the Town Hall which is located on the Main Road in Southold. If you have any guestions, please contact the Planning Board office at 765-1938. CC: jt cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Henry Raynor George Guldi Peter Danowski James Fitzgerald James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 CERTIFIED MAIL PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: Ail Involved Agencies Southold Town Planning Board Scoping Session for: Peconic Homes SCTM 91000-121-5-5.1 Douglas Miller SCTM ~1000-121-4-10.1 Daniel Jacoby SCTM %1000-125-1-5 Joseph Macari SCTM ~1000-12!-4-9. A.T. Holding Co. SCTM 91000-121-5-5.1 DATE: July 6, 1989 A Scoping Session has been set for Thursday, July 13, 1989 at 2 p.m. for the above mentioned subdivision applications. The Scoping Session will be held in the Meeting Hall of the Town Hall which is located on the Main Road in Southold. A copy of the Positive Declaration was sent to you under separate cover. If you are unable to attend the Scoping Session, please send any comments you may have as to items you wish be addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, to the Planning Board office. For your assistance, the Board's fax number is 765-1823. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Board office at 765-1938. CC: jt Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Environmental Conservation Suffolk County Department of Planning James Schondebare, Town Attorney Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Zoning Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 12, 1989 William Esseks,Esq. P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Applications in Laurel Lake Area which received a Positive Declaration on June 5, 1989 Dear Mr. Esseks: Enclosed please find the Town Board resolution of June 6, 1989, which may be of significance to your client. Noted below are three tentative dates for the scoping session which the Planning Board will be conducting. Please notify the Planning Board office by June 16th as to which date is most convenient for you. You will be notified of the confirmed date and time. July 6, 1989 - no specified time July 7, 1989 - no specified time July 12, 1989 -no specified time Please contact the office if you have any questions pertaining to the above. enc. ms Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 7, 1989 William Esseks, Esq. P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: A.T. Holding SCTM ~1000-121-5-8 1000-122-2-25 Dear Mr. Esseks: The following action was taken by the $outhold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 5, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board issue a Positive Declaration under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The Planning Board, as lead agent, determined that the proposed action described in the enclosed positive declaration may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statment will be prepared. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. enc. Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 7, 1989 POSITIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT to Part 617 of Article 8 of the Environmental Conser- vation Law, the $outhold Town Planning Board assumes lead agency, and, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed actions described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement shall be prepared. NAME OF ACTION: A.T. Holding Co. Joseph Macari Peconic Homes Daniel Jacoby Douglas Miller SCTM$ 1000-121-5-5.1 1000-122-2-25 34 lots on 91.53 acres. SCTM$ 1000-121-4-9 27 lots on 63.57 acres. SCTM$ 1000-121-3-7 1000-121-1- p/o 5 19 lots on 45.28 acres. SCTM$ 1000-125-1-5 2 lots on 10.58 acres. SCTM 9 ].000-121-4-10.1 3 lots on 8.2 acres. SEQRA STATUS: Each of the individual actions around:the Lake is, in effect, an unlisted action, but the cumulative effect is akin to a Type I action. **CONTINUED** REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION- There are three major and two minor subdivision proposals which together encompass approximately 219 acres and 85 lots in the vicinity of Laurel Lake; and There should be consideration of the potential cumulative effect of the proposed development on the ecology of the area with regard to the overall impacts on groundwater quality, surface water quality, wildlife habitat, and public lands; and The Laurel Lake area has been under study as a special groundwater protection area by the Long Island Regional Planning Board's Special Groundwater Protection Area Advisory Council; and The stretch of Sound Avenue between Bergen Avenue to the west and Cox Neck Road to the east is the sole point of ingress and egress, and none of these subdivisions has additional access to other public roads. This stretch of road is a heavily travelled east-west corridor and also a curving road on hilly terrain. Its capacity to handle safely the additional volume of traffic from the projected development should be examined. CONTACT PERSON: Further information can be obtained by contacting Jill M. Thorp, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. CC: jt Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Environmental Conservation,SB Suffolk County Department of Planning Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Zoning ~oard of Appeals Board of Trustees Planning Board Applicant Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD William Essek$, Esq. 108 East main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York Dear Mr. Esseks: 11901 April 1.3, 1989 RE: A.T. Holding SCTM91000-121-5-8 SCTM~1000-122-2-25 At this time the Planning Board has not received a revised map showing a cluster layout as previously requested. Please notify the Board as to if you intend to pursue this application. The Planning Board will not look favorably at the application as submitted, as a cluster layout has been requested. BENNETT ORLOWS~I, JR. CHAIRMAN cc: Howard Young ms DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE FEB - T 1959 $OUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P,H. February 6, 1989 Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Laurel Lake Subdivisions - SEQRA Evaluation (Daniel Jacoby: SCTM # 1000-125-1 ~5) (Joseph Marcari: SCTM # 1000-121-4-9) (A.T. Holding Corp.: SCTM # 1000-121-5-1 & 1000-122-2-25) (Peconic Homes: SCTM # 1000-121-3-7 & 1000-125-1 & p/o 2) Dear Ms. Scopaz: The Suffolk County Department of Health Service (SCDHS) has reviewed the above-referenced proposals. We have no objection to Town's designation as lead agency. Based on our preliminary review, we strongly believe that the potential for project- specific and cumulative negative environmental impacts is significant. Specifically, we believe that independently, the proposed actions pose potential significant impacts on groundwater, surface water, freshwater wetlands, wildlife habitat, and public lands resources within a similar geographical area. In addition, the close proximity of these proposals and their collective location within a designated Special Groundwater Protection Area (SGPA), supports a Letter to Valerie Scopaz February 6, 1989 Page 2 comprehensive assessment of short- and long-term cumulative impacts on the Laurel Lake area. As a result, we recommend that the above-mentioned proposals (and others which may be proposed in their vicinity) be reviewed collectively through a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GELS). We believe the need for a Laurel Lake GElS is well supported by the implementing rules and regulations for the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) which state in pertinent part that: "A Generic ElS may be used to assess the environmental effects of: (1) a number of separate actions in a given geographic area which, if considered singly may have only minor effects, but if considered together may have significant effects; or .... (3) separate actions having generic or common impacts..." [NYCRR: Part 617.15 (a)] The GElS can provide government agencies and the general public with an accurate impact assessment of the overall development of this area, and identify mitigation measures necessary to minimize potential impacts to the entire affected area (not simply individual site specific measures). Also, we are confident that a GElS for the entire 211-acre (approximate) development area will reduce duplication of efforts by the applicants and involved agencies, which may well occur in the event of independent, segmented reviews of each application. Finally, we believe the most valuable function of a GElS for the Laurel Lake area would be its identification and discussion of design alternatives. Responsibly undertaken, this part of the document would provide a detailed assessment of alternatives and project designs and comprehensive planning strategies [i.e., transfer of Letter to Valerie Scopaz February 6, 1989 Page 3 development rights (TDR), clustering, partial/total acquisition, etc.] intended to minimize potential negative impacts on the overall study area. We appreciate the opportunity to review these proposals and have enclosed a separate scoping outline which identifies content areas we would like to see addressed in a Laurel Lake GELS. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 548-3060. Sincerely, Robert S. DeLuca Biologist Office of Ecology CC: Vito Minei, P.E. Louise Harrison Stephen Costa, P.E Charles Lind, S.C. Planning Dept. Frank Panel<, NYSDEC Enc. RECOMMENDED SCOPING OUTLINE FOR A LAUREL LAKE GElS I. Descdotion of the PrODosed A(;ti0ns: A. Location The document should contain detailed design drawings and include Suffolk County Tax Map numbers for the overall project sites. B. Sanitary Code Compliance The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of water supply and sanitary sewage disposal systems. We recommend, therefore, that the document provide a detailed discussion of the regulations and compliance requirements of our agency as they apply to the proposed development and the potential alternatives to the proposed actions. In addition, the document should outline the Article VI application status of the proposed projects, and explain proposed methods of compliance with the appropriate requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC). General statements regarding the applicants' intentions to comply with all appropriate SCDHS standards should not be considered sufficient detail for this portion of the document. If the applicants have not yet submitted applications for realty subdivision approval to our agency, applications should be submitted at the earliest possible date so our staff may provide technical comments. C. Water Supply The document should discuss in detail sufficient for technical assessment, the water supply requirements for the proposed actions and should demonstrate water supply availability. D. Wetlands Delineation Wetlands and water bodies must be represented accurately on property surveys and site plans submitted tO our agency for review. Proposals with inaccurate information regarding wetlands and surface waters cannot be evaluated for yield, equivalent density, or proper locations of sewage disposal systems or water supply facilities. II. Environmental Setting A. Groundwater Quality We are concerned about potential groundwater quality impacts associated with the overall development of the study area, especially with respect to potential impacts on wetlands and surface waters. We recommend that the GElS evaluate potential groundwater impacts in the study area with specific attention to the potential impacts on Laurel Lake and its associated freshwater wetlands. The entire GElS study area is located within one of the Special Groundwater Protection Areas (SGPA) designated by the Long Island Regional Planning Board (LIRPB). The LIRPB has made substantive general recommendations regarding zoning and land use, aimed at protecting these area's groundwater resources. We encourage the Town to require discussion of the LIRPB's recommendations for these designated areas relative to the proposed actions and alternatives being evaluated in the GELS. B. Wildlife Habitat Identification and Protection 1. The document should provide a detailed assessment of the study area's terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, This section of the study should provide a detailed cover map of the study area and include the results of an on-site species inventory. (The document should not contain merely a predetermined list of probable species found in habitats similar to the subject study area.) In addition, the dates of all field studies and qualifications of the individual(s) conducting the investigations should be included in the document for review. The document should identify potential short- and long-term impacts to wildlife species and habitat as a result of the proposed actions. Information pertaining to rare and endangered species, habitat fragmentation, area-sensitive species, and loss of indigenous natural communities is important to this discussion. The document should evaluate (in detail sufficient for comparative assessment) project design alternatives which maximize protection of contiguous natural areas and provide for the highest diversity of natural habitat types. We are especially concerned about the full protection of any areas providing habitat for rare and endangered species. Sources of information pertaining to rare, threatened and endangered species should be stated in the GELS. We recommend the discussion be supplemented with information obtained from the regional office of NYSDEC and the New York State Natural Heritage Program. The Natural Heritage Program offers a Significant Habitat Information Service (518- 439-7486), and can be contacted at the following address: New York State Natural Heritage Program Wildlife Resources Center Delmar, New York 12054 C. New York State Regulations and Rec!uirement,~ 1. Development of parcels within the study area will be subject to regulation and review by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), pursuant to Article 24 Freshwater Wetlands Act of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law. The GElS should outline the regulatory requirements of the State pursuant to the above legislation and discuss how the proposed projects affected by this regulation will satisfy State permitting standards and policies. 2. The document should provide a detailed base map of the study area which includes NYSDEC-approved wetland delineations, and regulatory limits. D. Imoacts on Public Lands and Histodc Resource,~ 1. The GElS study area should include discussion of public lands of the NYDSEC and Camp Malloy. We are especially concerned about potential development impacts to the NYSDEC preserve property, and fishing opportunities on Laurel Lake. Also, we are concerned about any potential impacts on historic resources as a result of proposed development projects. We recommend, therefore, that the GElS include historic resources data for this area and a historical and archeological impact analysis for any of the proposed projects which may be necessary. E. Alternatives The GElS should provide appropriate design altematives with site plans which are suitable for comparative assessment. We recommend that alternative designs seek to maximize protection of the study area's natural habitats, freshwater wetlands, and water resources comprehensively, and be presented in an objective manner. Alternatives which unquestionably have greater impacts than the desired actions are inappropriate. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($16) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 12, 1989 Howard Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: A.T. Holding SCTM ~1000-121-5-8 SCTM 91000-122-2-25 Dear Mr. Young: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, January 9, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold Town ~lanning Board start the coordination process to determine Lead Agency and Environmental Significance on the following: Peconic Homes- SCTM #1000-121-3-7/1000-125-1-p/o 5 Joseph Macari- SCTM 91000-121-4-9 A.T. Holding Co.- SCTM ~1000-121-5-8/1000-122-2-25 Daniel Jacoby- SCTM ~1000-125-1-5 PLEASE NOTE THE FURTHER EXPLANATION ENCLOSED. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. ~truly BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN enc. WHEREAS, the stretch of Sound Avenue between Bergen Avenue to the west and Cox Neck Road to the east is the sole point of access and exit for four major and one minor subdivision proposal which in total encompass 210.96 acres and 84 Lots; and WHEREAS, none of these subdivisions have ready access to other public roads for additional access; and WHEREAS, this stretch of road is a winding, and curving road on hilly terrain, its capacity to handle safely the additional volume of traffic from the projected development is in question; and WHEREAS, this stretch of road is a heavily travelled east-west corridor; and WHEREAS, these particular applications are in the vicinity of Laurel Lake, there should be consideration of the potential cumulative impact of the proposed development on the area with regard to potential stormwater runoff, septic system leaching, groundwater quality and loss of habitat; and WHEREAS, the applications lie adjacent.to or within, whether · nwholly or in part, the Core Watershed Protection Area which has been designated by the Town Board (January 19, 1988) as a study area; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Water Advisory Committee has been reviewing land use management practices in this area, and the Core Watershed Protection Area has also been included as a special groundwater protection area by the LIRPB'S Special Groundwater Protection Area Advisory Council; and WHEREAS, these individual actions around the Lake are in effect, unlisted actions, the cumulative effect is akin to a Type I action, and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that The Southold Planning Board hereby assumes lead agency status in the review of the following applications: A.T. Holding Co,. SCTM# 121-5-18 and 122-2-25 (34 lots, 91.53A) Joseph Macari SCTM# 121-4-9 (27 lots 63.57A) ~ Peconic Homes SCTM# 121-3-7 and 121-1 p/o 5 (19 lots, 45.28A) Daniel Jacoby SCTM#125-1-5 (4 lots 10.58 acres) and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that The Planning Board hereby determines that the cumulative impact of~the above noted applications, for the above mentioned reasons, is likely to have an adverse environmental impact. Town H~'II, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 12,1989 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. your interest in assUming the responsibilities of lead agency; an'd 3. issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: A.T. Holdinq SCTM #1000-121-5-1 & 5/122-2-25 Requested Action: Applicant proposes to subdivide a 91.5271 acre parcel into 34 lots ran~ing in size from 80,000 s.f. to 207,000 s.f. located at LaureL. SE___QRA Classification: Type I Unlisted Contact Person: Jill M. Thorp 516-765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or no~ yo~l have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ~X ] This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this [ ] Thfs agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [xx ] Other. (See comments below) Comments: See attached resolution. Please feel free to contact this office for further information. cc: /,_Board of Appeals ~Board of Trustees ~LBuilding Department , Southold Town Board *~mSuffolk County Dept. *, NYSDEC- Stony Brook Sincerely, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN of Health Services ~S.C. Dept. of Public Works ~U.S. Ar4nlx-G~p-~f--EngLnee~.s '~_N.Y.S. Dept. of Transportation * Maps are enclosed for your review _ Coordinating agencies ALDEN W. YOUNG P~*,tonol Em:jir~,~ YOUNG ~, YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK HOW~RDW. YOUNG April 14, 1988 Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ATTN: Ms. Valerie Scopaz Dear Valerie, RE: A.T. HOLDING CORP., (87-970), at Mattituck, T/O Southold, New York Enclosed herewith please find check from A.T. Holding Corp., in the amount of Ten Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($10,200.00),represent- ing the required fee for the above captioned project. Encl~----~ cc: Mr. Irving Tepper William W. Esseks, Esq. Very truly yours, Howard W. Young III ~ ~o~ ~ ~ ~ ~/~ I I [ I x, ',, ~ ~,,,~ ,,,' /,, ~ al ~?~7~ %~11;~>~ ., ~ ~ ~ o , ~. '. , , ,'~',~.~'~ ~':~:';-~::' . ',, ~ ~t SITE DATA~ _ . ,, X~.. t I I ~) ~~~'~ ~--- ~:.:~:::x~R: ~ RESIDENTIAL- AGRICULTURAL "A" .~ / ,~. ,.-' J]~---~~~~ ...... ~ 3. TOTAL NO. OF LOTS=34 .~ / -".. '~ -~ -- -' ~ ~- ~ ~5,~~" ~'~ 4 LENGTH Of ROAD = 6500'~ ~, ~ / Ii~il.,/ ,".; __ ,,- ..',-' ,~~./ ....' . / ~ ~E~t: ~: ~ -~ /~ x ,, ~xx,,~- x , ..~k,~) ,'- ~. ~' ,' ~ / t ~' L~~ ~ ~ ..- .~-'< ~ ~ ~:~~ ~ / '" "' ', ) ~ , ~ '~ -. .~ .- . ~ ~(d: /~/~ ...-'- ,~,~s.,... _ . I1:,,,, ,,, .. I I ~ ~A /, :~ ~". { ,~ .""'" //~/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,' ~ ~ O' 207000- S.F. ~ ~.. ' /~ ' ' ~ ~ ~- ~ " "-k ~ ,~ .' - ~z ~~ ~ '- - '- -...~.~o ,,--~, ~ ,, >~ .---- ,,ooo, s.~~ " ~'~' .. ..--~ 103000 z S,E ,' --"'' /" 96000 x SE ~ "--,, SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN AZ. HOLDING CORP (~) , PREPARED FOR 87000-+ S,E / ----'" ....... AT LAUREL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~. SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. MAP - COW?Y 8t007