The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-121.-3-7 (2)I'.'.'",'N OF SOUTHOLD ]~I~Y 5 19.88 ENVIRO;~HENTAL ASS£SSNENT :'PART Project Information NOTICE: This Uocumant ~ desk?ned tO assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant as part of the a~olication for approval and may be subject to further verification and ~ublic review. Provide any additional informatipn you believe will be needed to cumulate PARTS Z and 3. It is ex~ecteo that cc~oietion of the FAF will be deoendent on information currently available and wilt not invoiye new studies, research or investiqation. If tnfor~ation requirinp such additional work is unavai~b)e, so Indicate and specify each instance. ~(A)tE OF P~OJECT: major subdivisiOn. ADD~ESS AND NA~tE OF APPLICANT: NAME ANO ADDRESS OF OWNER (If ~ifferent) (StreetJ Peocnic Homes Corporation Sound Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 (P.O.) (Sta:e) (State) PHONE: DESC~IPTIO~OF P~OJECT: (Brie¢ly describe typeof ~mJect uraction) m~joK of 45 acres at Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York (1000-121-3-7) (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate M.A. if not applicable) SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall project, both develoned and undeveloped areas) . I. General character of the land: Generally uniform slope x Generally uneven and rollinq or irreoular Present land use: UrOan , Industrial.~ , Con~nercial , Suburban ., Rure] X ., Forest , Agriculture , Other Total acreage of oroject area: 45 acres. Aooroximate acreage: Meadow or Brushland Aoricu)tural 'l,tiand (Freshwater or Tidal as nar Articles ..... nr r.C.L. ) '~rat ~t ~-edomieant soil type(s) on nroiect site? topsoil, I. ~,at ~s Ca,tn to bedrock? h/a 'n ~eet) Presently After Completion Presently ATtar Completion 35. ~acres 35_... ~cres t'later Surface Area acres ___ac-es 7... 0 acres 7.0 acres Unvegetated (rock, earth or fill) ___acres ~_acres acres acres Roads, buildings and other bayed surfaces ___acres acres 2.8 acres 2.8 acres Other (indicate tyne) acres acres loaI~l, sand 6. Aporoxirmte percentage of proposed crojeot site with slopes: O-lOS 90 ~' lA-)5~ lO ~; )5: or greater .. %. '~' 7. Is project contiguous to, or contain a buildinn or site listed on the National Register of Historic 8. What is the depth to the water table? __+30 feet g. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes x No 10. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endanoered - .Yes X ~lo, according to - I~ent.ify each species 11. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes~other geological formations - Yes ~ No. (Describe lg. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area - Yes X NO. 13. Does the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the coramunity? Yes , X NO 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary 15. Lakes, Ponds, ~etland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. flame Laur(=l Lake : b. Size (in acres) + 40 16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential, R-g} and the scale of development (e.g. g story). AR80 B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor b. Project acreage developed: 4~ acres initially; 4~ c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped ~ d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) 45 acres. · . acres ultimately. f. g. h. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: age ; developed acreage t~un~ber of off-stre~t barking spaces existing Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 10 If residential: Number and type of housing units: · One Family Two Family Initial 19 Ultimate 19 If: Orientation C!eignbornood-Ci ty-Regional Cor~nercia) InPustr~a) Total height of tallest nronosed structure building square foot- ; proposed _. pec code (upon completion of project) Multiple Family Condominium Estimated Employment feet· per code -2- 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site - 0 tons cubic yards. 3. How many acres of veqetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) ~ill be re~oved from site ~ 0 acres. 4. Will any mature forest (over lO0 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by thtS project? Yes ~ NO Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? __Yes × t~o 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction SO months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased nroject: a. Total number of phases anticipated No. b. Anticipated date of co,,nencement phase I __ year (incluOing den~lition) c. Approximate completion date final phase year. d. __Yes NO month month . Is phase 1 financially dependent on subseouent phases? yes, explain: Will blasting occur during construction? 8, Yes 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 15; after project is complete 0 Id. N~er of jobs eliminated by this project 0 ll. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? __Yes × No. 1Z. a. is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? x Yes b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) doraestic seweraoe c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged 15. Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? Yes ~ No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the lO0 year flood plain? __Yes x No 15. a. Does broject involve disposal of solid waste? Yes ~ No b. If yes. will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? __Yes c. If yes, give name: : location d. tlill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system~r into a sanitary landfill? __Yes Will ornject use herbicides or pesticides? Yes x No Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour Der day)? Yes x NO Will project produce o~erating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? 16. 17. 18. lO. Will droject result in an increase in energy use? X Yes electricity 20. If water supply is from wells indicate oumD4ng capacity 5 gals/minute. 21. Total anticipated water usage per day ~7-~ dais/day' 22. Zoning: a. Hhat is dominant zoning classification of site? ~80__ b. Current specific zjnino classification of site ~80 c. !s proposed use co~s~$tenc ,vith nresent ZOnlnd? yes d. ~ no, indicate desired zom~no ........ Yes x No No. If yes, indicate type(s) __ No 26. Is any Federal permit required? Yes ~ No Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required (Yes, No) (Type) Submittal (Date) _ No Approval (Date) City, Town, Village Board no City, Town, Village Planning Board ves subOivis±on City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other local agencies Tcostee$ Other regional agencies SCPC --~e~ State Agencies NYSDEC Federal Agencies INFORI4ATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoi em. TITLE: Aaent REPRESENTZNG: Pecon~c ~omes DATE: Mo, y 5, 1988 -4- APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT ty 5 1988 To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) appyoval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Toxvn Laxv and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owne? of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be ......................... J .......................... 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" here'to annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liher ... ?..~?. ............... Page ...~..~.~. ............... On .. ~./7./..8~ ............ Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; Lib O ' er ........................ Page ........... .... .... ... n .. ...................... as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ....................................... · °r as distributee ........................................................................ 5. The area of the land is .................. acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid ~91t ............ 7. The land is encumbered by .............................................................. mortgage (s) as follows: i ......... (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber l.~z~.~.~.~.' .... Page in original amount of ,$c~.10~.,. .... unpaid amount $ ./.~.~ .[..,~-.Q., ~ ..... held by 4-..~.ce.-~.~..C.~. address ..~.XO~..~.~)r.~'C~ ........................................... (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page ....................... in original amount of .............. nnpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... .............. address ............................................................... (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... ...................... address ................................ . ......................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land g>i~lRX ........................ 9. The land lies in the follo~ving zoning use districts ARS0 ........................ 10. No part of the land lies under water xvhether tide xvater, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept ............................................................................ 11. The applicant shall at his expense install ail required public improvements. 12. The land (xt~ (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Snpply District. Name oi Dis- trier, if within a District, is ............................................................... 13. Water mains xvill be laid by ....... Igf.~. ................................................ and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ....... h. :.I. :.L.: .C....O.. ..................... ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains xvill be installed by N/A .............................. and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Toxvn of Sonthold }tlghway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shoxwa on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjnnctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceediugs, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 3; 3. of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a COl)>' of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $ .......... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at .............. years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule,"F". D^TE .... ~'f...~...d...~.~: ............ ~9..~/.....?.~.C.~?~.X~:~..~.~: ........... (Name of Applicant) (Si~ature andOTit le) (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . ~ ................... ss: On the /~) day of ~ .., 19. ~.., before me personally came · .~..L.=.~. ~.~...~.q~ ~.C~..~. ................... to me known to be the individual described in and ,,'ho executed the foregoing instrument, and acknoxvledged that .... . .~.~.~.... executed the same. KAIHLEEN D. KOTZKY NOTARY PUBLIC, ~ate of New York No. 4842181 ~u~llfled In ~ffolk r~ otary rublic ..... : .... '~'~' ....... STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ~~: ............... ss: On the ..../.~. .......... day ............ of . .~....~...~. .... 19...~.'~i~' before me personally came ~]~,ff ¢ ./.Cd. ~ .F-.~..A/. ....... to me known, ,,'ho being b; me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ..... ~.~..~... resides at No.. ~./. ~. ~... ~......~. ~/...~...&.~./../P~Yff/~. -/~./.~./.. - -~-;~.'~i · ./-/...~../.~.~.:~ ............... ~ha~ ...... ~.~ ............... is the ~..~..-... ,;..~/~>..., ...... of ~.:.:~..~z~.~.:~: .... ~..~.~. .................................... the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that ./~.~.~. ...... knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. and that ... ~..e.~.. signed .~.r.~ name thereto by like order . ~NoTKARAyI'Hpu[~cN, sDt:JoOfTNZK~¥York ~li~... ~..~. g.':.~.Z¢ ............. No. 4~42181 Quelifled In ~uffOl# Count/ Camml#lon l~l~el ~uly ~b [~ SOUTHOLD PLANNING B~D'"~ it ..... FEBRUARY 1993 O.K. sure. I guess you are also aware .that this~ication is $1000.00 dollars to s~a~with and it i? som_eth~n~ ~e~ously thought about anco want to go through with it an~didn't know if~L~n~eded an attorney to do ~icat~n~at I p~bably needed one bu~t~nl~ ~ can s~ings up, I ~ interested. But, then once again to go ~p~a lot of mo~n all kinds of p~ns j. u~ ~ ~~h~~ Mr~n of w~ ~eaning to Mr. Ward: Also on our agenda tonight we have Mr. Razor to discuss Peconic Hemes. Mr. Raynor: It is interesting to sit here and listen to Mr. Blum expound about why he needs some form of light business. Not that this has anything to do with Peconic Homes but it reminds me about twelve years ago when the Board stood up and said we recommend some form of light business in the exact location that Mr. Blum is indicating. Meanwhile Peconic Homes at present is seeking some guidance from the Board and you are aware that there are two brothers and principals involved with this forty five acre tract of property. It has been on off, on off, for nine or ten years and I think finally we are heading in some direction. Not that I have been involved with it for that length of time, it probably would have been longer if I was involved in it. But, the brothers have finally reached a decision pending the disposition of this Board that they would take the forty five acres on which one of them presently has residence, develop four lots in a minor subdivision mode given a variance with regard to road construction, they would intend to have the existing right of way which meanders through their property and down to the lake to others in Laurel. A gravel road in keeping, actually an improvement of what is there today if you are familiar with the Laurel Lake right of way. The greenhouse operation on the northwesterly section of the property they would like to section off to utilize as just that. A greenhouse operation to compromise approximately twelve acres at its maximum disposal. The remainder of the property they would be willing to covenant and restrict, be put into a form of development rights acquisition be it either Town, County or any other agency. If the Board does not feel that this is the proper way to go, that it does not fit with the plans that are ongoing in the area, that they foresee to be ongoing in the area, then obviously they would be willing to withdraw this plan and go on a major subdivision approach which would yield somewhere in the neighborhood of twenty homes. I understand that there has been some questions and confusion that has been with the principals themselves in trying to decide which way SOUTHOLD PLANNING BO~ 12 FEBRUARY 1993 they want to go with this. I am here tonight to see what direction the Board might want to give this particular subdivision. Mr. Ward: I would guess that what is the driving equation here is what is this quote "open space" what condition are they looking for on that? What open end is there going to be on that? Mr. Raynor: The open end is they get a fair market value for their development rights. I don't want to be placed in a situation where the Town or the County said well, you have bargained away X, Y, and Z by doing a minor subdivision, therefore we are going to give you fifty percent of your development right value. Mr. Ward: Come back on that one again, I missed that. Mr. Raynor: I see such extremes foreinstance last week in the paper as far as thirty thousand dollars an acre being proposed for certain parcels in the town for development rights and these people are business men and they looked at it and said, what is going on here? A, we would like to have our ongoing business which is our greenhouse business. B, we all want to live here. Four lots, take care of the brothers and some key employees that are on the parcel. C, we don't want to give up the remaining density for nothing. We want to be in a position where we can enter into either ~--development right plan by the Town or by the County where we can recoup some of the capital expenditure which we put into the forty five acres. Mr. McDonald: The twelve acres have been reserved for the greenhouse area. Now, I am not sure I understand. There is greenhouse operation there now? a Mr. Raynor: That is correct. Mr. McDonald: Is there anything else operating on the site? Mr. Raynor: Not to my knowledge. Everyone talking. Mr. McDonald: How many houses are presently serviced by the right of way that is there now, do you know? Mr. Raynor: Lee, Jacoby and if you take the east perimeter of that property you will find you tie into the Macari subdivision. Again, that is why I am coming back to the Board because I don't know what, if anything you have envisioned for, I think McCarey has 'sixty some odd acres to the east of this property. I don't know what the game plan is there or the disposition of roadway. SOUTHOLD PLANNING 13 FEBRUARY 1993 Mr. McDonald: Is it a house or two houses past the end of their property in this right of way? Mr. Raynor: I would say that there are at least two down there. There may be more, there may be as many as three or four down there. Years ago, there was a camp at the end of it which burned down about ten years ago. That would be to the left of the right of way. Mr. McDonald: I was down there a couple of years ago and I don't remember. There are no houses presently on any of the lots they propose in their subdivision? Mr. Raynor: They have an out parcel, they have several out parcels, this was developed years and years ago. Lot #2 has an existing. Mr. McDonald: The out parcel has a house? Mr. Raynor: Yes, was down there when the Kerups owned this. Mr. McDonald: Lot three and four? Mr. Raynor: I don't believe either of those at the time. Mr. McDonald: served. So, we are looking at least four houses being Turned tape, everyone talking. Mr. McDonald: So there are least four serviced by this presently and you are talking about adding two more to that number. Mr. Ward: Maybe to clarify things Henry, this remaining open space or large lot or whatever we are going to call it for now, if you could commit something to writing to what the deal is on that, in other words what are they really saying. Mr. Raynor: W"nat they are saying is, should they be provided with (A) a four lot minor (B) the operation of the greenhouse, there will be no more residential density on the remainder of the property. Mr. Ward: Yes, but they are saying other than the twelve acres, the rest they could develop at a future date if they don't get the development rights. Mr. Raynor: No, not at all. Mr. McDonald: What happens if no one will pop up the money? SOUTHOLD PLANNING 14 FEBRUARY 1993 Mr. Raynor: I don't know. You are telling me that the programs are about to stop, then obviously there won't be any · more development rights purchased. Mr. Ward: We don't know that that's there to drive the equation that is what I am saying. Mr. Raynor: I can't answer the Board's question as to what type of capital budget is coming up. Mr. Ward: What I am saying is, look at it the other way. What if? In other words, we are asking the applicant now. Let's say, that we would agree that that is a good idea and we went ahead with it but what happens if it doesn't happen? Mr. Raynor: Well, then I would suggest that the gentlemen standing over everybody's shoulder up there come up with a mechanism for stopping that. Mr. Kiernan: Maybe the way to do it is to approach the Town and the County with development rights program right now and get at least appraisal's done on what the current market value is today and come back with those numbers and maybe you and your client's will see where you are and maybe you will get an indication of where the Town and where the County is in their programs and that might eliminate that question from the equation. Mr. McDonald: The only thing I can give you on that is that we tried that a couple of years ago and now we are a couple of years down the road and we are not any closer because no one is prepared to move on this at this point and that is what we are worried about but there is no money. Is there a time frame that they are prepared to, this isn't going to happen instantaneously, they want to move ahead with the subdivision. Is there some time frame that they would set for the remaining acres for the TDR to be taken care of. Mr. Raynor: Let me bounce it back to you. Come back with a reasonable time frame and I don't think there is a problem. The driving force here seems to be for the client's privacy. Any structure whether it be involved with years or dollars or mechanisms, somewhere down the line we may see TDR's. Mr. McDonald: Well that's it, the question is if we get enough years together to get to that point. Mr. Raynor: They can sell it at an average market price. And again, I am presenting to you gentlemen what I have been told by the client. If they can get an average market price based on development rights sales, they would be more than willing to put it into that program. They just do not want to be locked into a position where an agency comes and says, well you bargained away your rights, now we are going to give you a unreasonable market value for the remainder of your property. SOUTHOLD PLANNING 15 FEBRUARY 1993 Mr. Orlowski: What type of road do they plan on building in here. Mr. Raynor: This was predicated on a gravel road. Mr. Orlowski: Just what is there right now basically? Mr. Raynor: No, it would be an improved gravel road, certainly more than what is there right now. Everyone talking. Mr. Ward: We have to worry about the open space right now. Mr. Latham: How large is the greenhouse area? Mr. Raynor: The maximum that they have indicated they wanted to go was twelve acres and I think that should be site restrictive. There are large densities concerned as far as lot coverage is concerned. Mr. Ward: Maybe what we could do in the interim while we are trying to come up with some mechanism to bounce back to you would be to give us a survey updated with the greenhouses on it and what ever else is there and what line they would like to see at the time being as this twelve acre area so we could consider the overall. That is kind of missing on this one. Mr. Raynor: Sorry. If you would address some of that in correspondence, I would be happy to respond. Mr. McDonald: Is there some way we can keep down the price so they can just give us .... . There isn't even an application before us for this if I'm not mistaken. Maybe they can just sketch it in. I understand we want to have a relatively accurate representation but by the same extent, we don't want to drive the cost of this, considering that we are now really only chitchatting. Mr. Raynor: That is exactly right because I don't want it to go forward or find we are headed down the wrong path. Mr. McDonald: I like the idea of being able to see it a little bit better but by the same extent I don't want them to go out and have to shell out a lot of money in order to get to that point. Mr. Raynor: We Can give you an arbitrary line, twelve acres as far as the greenhouses are concerned. Mr. Orlowski: This is 1985, this map. Is there anything newer than this? SOUTHOLD PLANNING 16 FEBRU~RY 1993 Mr. Raynor: Not a thing because they have, since it was rejected originally, they went back and said, we will in this case just optimize our investment, put the management density on and go forward with the major subdivision and quite honestly they have had about thoughts about it. Mr. Kiernan: Henry, have your client's approached the land preservation committee with this? Mr. Raynor: No, not with this. It will be a tax driven consideration certainly if there is something there. (Inaudible). Right now, they are very meanable for suggestions. Mr. Kiernan: Mark, isn't this in the special groundwater protection zone? Mr. McDonald: These lots are pretty large lots. Was there any particular reason for making them that large? Is it because of the slopes that are on them? Mr. Raynor: Entirely for privacy. There is secondary wood growth on it at this point and some of it has primary on it. Mr. McDonald: There is a large hunk of this in the, I guess would be the southern section or the southern most of the southwestern section that is wetlands? it Mr. Raynor: There is some marshland in the lowest part of the southwest corner. Mr. McDonald: Is that part of this parcel being counted into the acreage? The way it is drawn here is a little bit confusing. Mr. Raynor: It is very confusing. When I looked at it, I interpreted both ways. Mr. McDonald: O.K., maybe you can try to find out if that parcel, when you are talking about the twelve acres, the amount of land left over for the development right, if this part of that is being included in the number over there, some of which this land is, of course you wouldn't know (inaudible). Everyone talking. Mr. McDonald: Why don't you find out if that is part of the acreage. Everyone talking. Mr. Raynor: I don't anticipate that being a problem. It is unbuildable. Everyone talking. SOUTHOLD PLANNING B~ 17 FEBRUARY 1993 Mr. Ward: In your recollection is there an approved yield map on this property? Mr. Raynor: Oh yeah. Mr. Ward: That is what drives the twenty-two lots? Everyone talking. Mr. McDonald: I think this lot is the same as this one. These lots are one in the same. They are contiguous. They are the same lot the way it is proposed and the right of way lies entirely within this line. Mr. Raynor: The right of way would be in lot one as indicated. Mr. McDonald: And that wetlands section is also part of lot #1. That is the way I am interpreting it. Everyone talking. Mr. Raynor: I would interpret it as part of Lot #4 but it doesn't show the square footage. Mr. McDonald: See, the lines aren't crossing over. Mr. Raynor: But, it goes around the perimeter to the south and then to the west and swings back again to the north but it doesn't have closure on the northwest corner of 94. Mr. McDonald: Can you make a guess on the area of that? Mr. Raynor: The lower tail? I would say it's four acres. Everyone talking. Mr. Raynor: seen it. Mr. McDonald: You made Everyone talking. Mr. Mr. I made this arbitrary line and they haven't even some major changes to the end of this. Ward: O.K. so you will get back to us with whatever we need. Raynor- Yes ~9, 1~2 minutes. / ~ / ~./ ~/ Mr~McDona ld :~moved. ~ _~ , q HENRY E. RAYNOR 320 LOVE LANE MATT][TUCK, N.Y 11952 516-298-8420 FAX 516-~98-2127 -~ ~rO: VALERIE BCOPAZ ~OUTHOLD ~OWN PLANNING BOARD REI. PECONIC HOMES JAN. ~0~ PURSUANT TO OUR CONVERSATION LAST WEEK, 1 HAVE MET WITH DAVID HORTON; AND THE FOLLOWING IS PROPOSED. 1. ]~HE APPLICANT WILL PROCESS THE MINOR SUBDIVISION (MAP IN YOU'R OF~CE)'WITH THE CONSTRUCITON OF GRAVEL ROADS. 2. 'THE APPLICANT REQUIRES A TOTAL OF 12 ACRES FOR THE LOCATION AND OPERA¥IONS OF THE GREENHOUSE SITE. ~. THE APPLICANT WILL OFFER THE REMAINING PROPERTY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PROGRAMS, AT FAIR MARKET VALUE, TO ANY MUNICIPAL AGENCY. ~4'~ YHE APPLICANT IS W~LLING TO COVENANT AND RESTRICT, IN RECORDABL~ FORM, THE ABOVE UPON APPROVAL OF THE MINOR SU~ AS DESCRIBED. ii¥~H~K YOU~ AND THE BOARD, FOR THIS CONSIDERATION. ~NHING BOARB HENRY E. RAYNOR 320 LOVE LANE MATTITUCK, N.Y 11952 516-298-8420 FAX 516-298-2127 JAN. 11, 1993 TO: SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD RE: PECONIC HOMES SUB. 1000-121-3-7 ENCLOSED ARE THREE MAPS FOR MINOR SUBDIVISON AS REOUESTED IN YOUR LETTER OF JAN. 5. PLEASE REVIEW THE ENCLOSED. THANK YOU. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 5, 1993 SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Peconic Homes SCTM# 1000-121-3-7 1000-125-1-p/o 5 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board has received your letter of December 18, 1992, in regard to a proposed minor subdivision for the above mentioned property. If you send a sketch of the proposed minor subdivision referenced in the letter we will review the proposal. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. V~. truly.yours Richard G. Ward Chairman P.I HENRY E. [~AYNOR '~[~ LOVE LANE f~IATTITLJCK, N.Y 11~5~ 516 -298-,~420 FAX 516-2~-21~7 TO: SOuTHQLD TOWN PLANNING BOAR£~ RE: P~CONI£ HOMES, LAUREL. DEC. 18, 199~ THE APPLICANTS HAVE APPROA£HED ~E TO EXPLORE THE STATUS THE ABOVE SUBDIVISION pROPOSAL ~EFORE YOUR BOARD. THEY WOUuD BE ~NTERESTE~ IN C~ATING A MINO~ SHOULD THE PLANNING BOARD BE WI~.LING TO ALLOW THEM GRAVEL ROADS FOR ACCESS. IF THIS IS NO~ ~HE CASE~ ~HEY AR~ INT~RF~STE~ IN GOING WITH A MAJOR SUBDIVISION ON THIS PARCEL. PLEASE ADVISE. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 10, 1991 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Kevin Law, Director Suffolk County Department of Real Estate 395 Oser Avenue Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: AT Holding Corporation SCTM#1000-121-5-5.1, 1.3, 1.4 Peconic Homes (Horton Bros) SCTM#1000-121-3-7 1000-125-1- P/O 5 Dear Kevin: It would seem that the years of work previous to this point are about to bear fruit. With AT Holding and Peconic Homes before you for possible purchase under the 1/4% program. Southold can take a major step in its plan for future water supply and protection. I would appreciate a chance to meet with you at your convenience to discuss these two possible acquisitions. Your help in these matters has always been outstanding and I look forward to working with you in the future. ~k ~McDonald / cc: Scott L. Harris, Supervisor Town Board Open Space Committee Planning Board Horton Brothers Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, Poe. RAYMOND L. JACOBS SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS PB J~S A o ~IC~ER E~INE~RIN~ TNSPEC~O~ 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AUGUST 20, 1991 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 RE: PECONIC HOMES, INC. SCTM # 1000-121-3-7 1000-t25-1-p/o 5 Dear Mr. Orlowski: I have been asked by your office to review the existing conditions in the above referenced subdivision with reguards to the road construction. The existing road on this site is dry and stable. It consists of a mixture of sand & loam that has been turned, graded & compacted. This surface, after a minor regrading, could be considered an accuptable substitute for the 4" stone subbase that is required by the Town's Specifications. At this point in time approximately 30% of the proposed road does not exist. If this section is prepaired in the same manner as the remaining drive it will also be considered an acceptable substitute for a~ 4" stone subbase. The reason for this inspection, as I understand it, is that a request has been made to reduce the Highway Specifications. Due to the length of the proposed road as compaired to the number of lots proposed, I can totally appreciate why the request was made. However, I can not recommend what items may or may not be deleted from the Highway Specifications. Ail of the Specifications were written for a reason & any deletions would reduce quality or longevity of the road. Any deletions or reductions to the required Specifications would require either Planning Board or Town Board approval. Please keep in mind that a surface water runnoff problem allready exists on Sound Avenue at the entrance to this subdivision. Even if construction specifications are reduced on a major portion of the road the first 600'~ of new road that will intersect with Sound Avenue should meet all of the Specification requirements. The drainage design at the intersection will need careful consideration so as not to make a bad situation worse. cc: Scott L. Harris Raymond L. Jacobs file If you have any questions concerning this matter or if you require any additional information, Please contact my office. lames ri~Z,~R, m SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER i~y ~oI JUL $ I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTY L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 June 27, 1991 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Peconic Homes SCTM# 1000-121-3-7 1000-125-1-p/o 5 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board has reviewed your letter dated June 11, 1991, which was received on June 26, 1991, and your letter dated June 20, 1991, which was received on June 24, 1991. The Board will be retaining their Environmental Consultant to review the prior scoping outline for the above mentioned subdivision application, and to make a recommendation to the Planning Board as to what information must be included in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. The Planning Board is requiring a fee of $250.00 for the above mentioned review. Payment must be received before the Planning Board will authorize the work. This fee is not an additional fee. At such time that your client submits the DEIS, the fee of $750 for review of the scope and adequacy of the document will be reduced by $250. In addition, at such time that the DEIS is accepted as complete, your client will also be required to submit a payment of $1500 for the critical review of the document. In response to your June llth letter requesting a preliminary hearing, please be advised that State law prohibits the Planning Board from granting approvals until the SEQR process is completed (6 NYCRR Part 617.9). The Planning Board can not set the preliminary hearing until such time that the DEIS has been deemed complete. As mentioned above, the Planning Board will be referring your letter of June 20th to. their Consultant. However, until we receive payment of the review fee, there will be no further environmental review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, J~. ~ Chairman 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY June 11, 1991 11952 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: ?econic Homes Corporation 1000-121-3-7 & 1000-125-1-p/o5 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Please be advised that the principals of Peconic Homes Corporation now wish to proceed with the above referenced subdivision. We hereby request a preliminary hearing be held and await your scheduling for a specific date. Should you require any additional information prior to setting a preliminary hearing date, please contact me. Sincerely, HER:ml CC: Horton JUN 2 6 199I 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY June 20, 1991 11952 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Peconic Homes Corporation major subdivision at Laurel Dear Sirs: After meeting with Melissa Spiro, it's our understanding that sketch plan approval is the current status of the above referenced subdivision. We hereby request from Kramer & Voorhees the specific areas of review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act that are covered in the scoping sessions for referral to our environmental planner. Sincerely, HER:ml CC: David Horton PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 7, 1991 ScoTr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Peconic Homes SCTM# 1000-121-3-7 1000-125-1-p/o 5 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board has reviewed your letter of January 15, 1991, in reference to the above mentioned subdivision proposal. The status of the Peconic Homes proposal remains as it was prior to your client's inquiries pertaining to proceeding with a minor subdivision. The Board is still waiting for a draft generic environmental impact statement to be submitted pursuant to the scoping session that was held on July 13, 1989. With the exception of the A. T. Holding proposal, the subdivision applications mentioned in your letter are active still. The status of these proposals are listed below: There are two applications on file for the Jacoby proposal. The Planning Board has requested clarification from the applicant as to which proposal he wishes the Board to proceed with. The Guildi and Miller court decision is being appealed by the Town. This application was denied several years ago. Therefore, it is not an active application in the usual sense. The environmental review has not been completed for the Macari proposal. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement was deemed incomplete on November 16, 1990. The Board is waiting for the submission of an amended DEIS. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. enc. cc: Dave Horton Gerry L. Horton Very truly yours, B Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 19, 1990 SCO~I'F L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Peter S. Danowski, Jr. 616 Roanoke Avenue P.O. Box 779 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Macari at Laurel SCTM~1000-121-4-9 Dear Mr. Danowski: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a special meeting held on Friday, November 16, 1990. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deem the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) dated'September 1990, and received by the Planning Board on September 27, 1990, incomplete in regard to scope, content and adequacy as per the November 8, 1990, report from Cramer, Voorhis and Associates. The DEIS is to be amended to address or include the items noted in the report. The thirty (30) day public comment period to consider the accuracy and validity of the document will not be started until the Planning Board has deemed the DEIS complete. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman encl. cc: Charles J. Voorhis, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 January 15, 1991 Southold Town Main Road Southold, NY Planning Board 11971 RE: Proposed major subdivision of Peconic Homes 1000-121- Corporation Dear Mr. Orlowski: Pursuant to your letter of December 20, Mr. Horton has been notified that the above captioned subdivision proposal principals are desirous of proceeding with a major subdivision on this property. Whereas the County of Suffolk has not proceeded in a diligent pursuit of acquisition, we wish to resume processing before your Board. It has come to our attention that A & T Holding is no longer processing their properties, nor is Mr. Jacoby going forward with his subdivision. It appears Mr. Miller and Mr. Guldi are in litigation concerning their subdivision and to date I have seen no activity with regards to submission of the adjoining property of Mr. Joseph Macari. In light of these observations, I would ask the Board to consider only this active parcel in its processing under SEQRA. The original resolution of a DEIS, we would trust, is no longer binding on this parcel. Please advise as to the status of this application before your Board Bo that we may proceed as rapidly as possible as well as the status of this application with regard to the SEQRA review. Sincerely, HER:MI CC: Horton PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 December 20, 1990 Dave Horton Gerry L. Horton Peconic Homes Corporation Kirkup Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Messieurs Horton: This is in response to your inquiries about the status of your Peconic Homes subdivision application. As stated in a letter dated May 22, 1990, your proposal (to sell some of your property to the County and to plat the remainder as a minor subdivision), is supported by the Planning Board. On October 23rd, the County notified the Town that your property will be appraised by the Park Trustees. This is the first step in the County's acquisition process. If you wish to proceed with your application at this time, you can do so. The maps should be revised to indicate that the property you wish to sell to the County will be designated as open space, and not a building lot. And, the application will have to be amended from a major to a minor subdivision. Enclosed you will find a new application form. Resubmit these forms to this office along with twelve minor subdivision maps. On the minor subdivision maps, the land to be sold to the County should be labeled "Open Space". Also, place a statement on the map that the lot with the greenhouse shall not be further subdivided. With regard to the modified road specifications, the Town Board just adopted them. A copy of the new specifications is enclosed for your information. I hope this answers your questions. If there are further questions, please do not hesitate to bring them to our attention. Very Truly Yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Arthur Kunz, Director, Suffolk County Department of Planning JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTIC~ MARRIAGE OFFICER Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK ..... TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER :27. 1990: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby approves and adopts the following amendments to Chapter Al08, Highway Specifications, from the Code of the Town of Southold, as recommended by the Superintendent of Highways, Town Board HighwaY Committee, and Planning Board: I. Chapter A108 (Highway Specifications) of the Code of the Town of Southold is hereby amended as follows: 1. Section A108-15(A) is hereby added to read as follows: The specifications set forth in the following chart shall apply to all constructed roadways after December 1, 1990: Finished Number of Lots Pavement Width Serviced by Road Density (1)' * 12 Ft., I All R Zones * 16 Ft. 2-4 All R Zones * 16 Ft. 5 & Over R-200+, R-400+ 20 Ft. 5 & Over R-120+, AHD+, HD+ 24 Ft. 5 & Over R-80, R-40, AHD & HD 28 Ft. All Industrial II. Designates road pavement without curbs, utilizing drainage in swales; .vs. roads with curbing and drainage basins within the pavement area. + On site parking as required by the Planning Board. (I) Zone District designation or land developed at density of Zone District, i.e., R-80 Zone, but developed at R-120 density, road width would be reduced from 24 to 20 ft. Planning Board may require wider roads when necessary. 2. The attached drawings, numbered SD-854M-I and SD-854M-2 shall be added in numerical order to the current drawings at the end of Chapter A108. This resolution shall take effect immediately. November 29,. 1990 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STANDARD ASPHALT ROADWAY FOR MINOR SUBDIVISIONS R.O.W. UNE R.O.W. UNE TYPIOAL SEOTION RECOU~DED BY: APPRO~D BY: CONSUL~NO ENGINEERS ~-- ~--~g 3D-854M-] TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STANDARD ASPHALT ROADWAY FOR MINOR SUBDIVISIONS ' 25'-0° R.O.W. .TYP CAL SECTION RECOMM~DED BY: APPRO~O CONSUL~NG ENGINEERS ~_~_~4 gD-854M-2 -- RA~OND JACOB~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latharn, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 May 22, 1990 Gerry L. Horton Peconic Homes Corp. P.O. Box 21 New Suffolk, New York 11958 Proposed subdivision for Peconic Homes, Inc. SCTM9 1000-121-3-7 1000-125-1-p/o 5 Dear Mr. Horton: The Planning Board reviewed the marked map which was received by the Planning Board on May 2, 1990. The Board is in favor of you pursuing the sale of the marked area to Suffolk County. The Board is currently working on Code modifications which would enable the Planning Board to modify the road specifications. In light of the fact that such a large percentage of the parcel is to remain forever in open space, the Board would be in favor of waiving the current road specifications subject to the following: A covenant and restriction be placed on Lot Number 1, the lot with the existing greenhouse, stating that there is to be no further subdivision of this lot in perpetuity. The Planning Board is anxious to work with you on the above mentioned subdivision proposal. You will be kept informed as to the status of modifications to the road specifications. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chariman SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SCOTT L. HARRIS ~_ SUPERVISOR OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, L.]., N.Y. 11971 April 5, 1990 Enclosed is your map. I have forwarded this information to Mark Mc Donald in Planning. Scott TELEPHONE (516) 765-1800 (516) 765-1939 Southold 1-own Hall Supervisor's O'f:f.i. ce Southold, NY 11971 Dear- Scott ~ As per our telephone conversation of March 26, 1990 we are sending yeu a map of our minor subdiwLsion. We would l~.ke te explore the possibility of doing a m.~nor subdivision as J~ndzcaLed Ol'l the map with a gravel road. I9 the saL.Ibd.i, visioF1 lS approved and we are able to ob[ain a fair price from Su'ffolk County we would sell approximately 28 [o 5(' acres to SMffolk COL~rlt~y 90r a core watershed area. This is ir'~c:l.i, cat:ed by shading on map. We would be willing te meet with yeu or the planning boar'd and or any county offi'cials a'.. your convenience. 199(),I9 we rece~.ve no response fr'om this letter before May 1, we will assume you are not ' = ..~....=.. 'for a major subd.i, vision. ].nt~.~.~...e.J and proc:eed with our pla~Js Thank you for your .interest. Si.l~cerely, cc: ~rl..l~Lr I<UFiZ SC P]annJ. ng (]omm.i. s s i on Gerry L. Hot-ton PEi. l:::[)lqI L: HOMES CI'IRP. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 27, 1990 SCO'IT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Henry E. Raynor, Jr. P.O.Drawer A Jamesport, New York 11947 Re: Major Subdivision of Peconic Homes Corp. SCTM # 1000-121-3-7 # 1000-125-1-5 Dear Mr. Raynor, In response to your request to schedule a public hearing on the preliminary subdivision map for the above-named application, please be advised that State law prohibits the Planning Board from granting approvals until the SEQR process is completed (6 NYCRR Part 617.9). Inasmuch as this Board is still waiting for a draft generic environmental impact statement to be submitted pursuant to the scoping session that was held on July 13, 1989, it is unable to proceed with the review process. Very Truly Yours, Chairman P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY October 17, OCT I 9 1959 11947 1989 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Peconic Homes Corporation 1000-121-3-7 & 1000-125-1-p/o5 Dear Mr. Orlowski: My client has reviewed your letter of October 6, 1989, subsequent to Mr. Bressler's letter of the same date. Please be advised we wish to prepare a DEIS and will begin as soon as possible. Concurrent with that, we would again request a preliminary hearing on this subdivision so that the environmental concerns and the subdivision regulations can go forward on a parallel track. HER:ml CC: David Horton Eric Bressler Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York i 1971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OCtober 6, 1989 Eric J. Bressler, Esq. Wickham, Wickham & Bressler P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, New York 11952 Re: Application of Peconic Homes Corporation SCTM # 1000-121-3-7 -125-1-p/o5 Dear Mr. Bressler The Planning Board has reviewed your letter of August 9, 1989 in which you requested that the Planning Board reverse its positive declaration and issue a negative declaration with regard to the above-referenced application. The Board has not changed its position, which is that a draft environmental impact statement should be prepared. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Truly YourA~D /7 ,-~ ,~ .... //>//5/ //// Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~ Chairman ' cc: James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney Toxvn Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 6, 1989 Henry Raynor P.O.Drawer A Jamesport, New York 11947 Re: Application for Peconic Homes SCTM # 1000-121-3-7 -125-1-p/o5 Dear Mr. Raynor, The Planning Board has reviewed your letter of September 14, 1989. It is unable to respond to your request because the applicant has been advised that a draft environmental impact statement should be prepared. In this regard, the enclosed letter to Eric Bressler, attorney for Peconic Homes, may be of interest to you. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very Truly Yours .. _ . . ,, ,. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Enc. cc: James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 September 14, 1989 Southold Town Main Road Southold, NY Planning Board 11971 RE: Peconic Homes Corp. 1000-121- Dear Sirs: Pursuant to Section 106-42 under the Southold Town Code please find enclosed twelve prints of the preliminary subdivision plan for the above referenced. Please set this application on the next available agenda for preliminary approval. HER:ml Encs. CC: Peconic Homes Corp. Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1989 Henry Ralrnor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Peconic Homes SCTM ~1000-121-5-5ot Dear Mr. Raynor: The fee for the environmental review of application will total two theusand dollars. However, the Planning Board has been billed for the review to date, which is two hundred and fifty dollars. Please pay the two hundred and fifty dollars upon receipt of this letter. Thank you for. your coorporation. the above mentioned y your s, BENNETT ORLOWSKI ,JR. CHAIRMAN CC: Cramer, Voorhis & Associates CERTIFIED MAIL To: FROM: RE: All Involved Applicants Mr~ Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Scoping Outline for the DEIS on Peconic Homes SCTM 91000-121-5-5.1 Douglas Miller SCTM #1000-121-4-10.1 DanielJacoby SCTM 91000-125-1-5 Joseph Macari SCTM 91000-121-4-9 A.T. Holding SCTM 91000-121-5-8 DATE: August 18, 1989 Enclosed please find the scoping outline for the above referenced projects. The attached document constituts the outline of what must be addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact for the above referenced actions. All actions must be addressed in one comprehensive document, as outlined herein, due to the potential for cumulative impacts. As this DEI$ is to address five projects in a cumulative manner, it is imperative that we receive an indication as to your intentions of completing this document. Accordingly, we are requesting verification of your intent, in the form of a certified letter, indicating whether or not you intend to pursue the individual application referenced above and if you are going to participate inthe preparation of the comprehensive DEI$. Please forward your responses by certified mail, in order to ensure the most efficient handling of the correspondence. We must receive your response by September 1, 1989t or we wil~-- assume that you do not wish to exercise the option of preparing the DEIS and this agency shall terminate review of your project in conformance with 6 NYCRR Part 617.8(a). Please contact the office if there is any questions with the above. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SCOPING OUTLINE for the Laurel Lake Study Area Southold, New York INTRODUCTION: This document was compiled using the Scoping Checklist contained within 6 NYCRR Part 617.21 Appendix D, and as a result of a scoping meeting held July 13, 1989 at the Town of Southold Town Hall for the following actions: Peconic Homes Douglas Miller Daniel Jacoby Joseph Macari A.T. Holding Co. SCTM #1000-121-5-5.1 SCTM #1000-121-4-10.1 SCTM #1000-125-1-5 SCTM #1000-121-4-9 SCTM #1000-121-5-5.1 The purpose of this document is to identify the basic topic areas which must be addressed in the DEIS. Topics which require detailed discussion are so noted. This document will be used, in conjunction with Part 617.14, to review the proposed DEIS with regard to scope and adequacy at the time if submission to the lead agency, in addition, as the action includes five projects, with potential cumulative effects, relevant sections of Part 617.15 will also be utilized in the review. For the purposes of this scoping document the area containing the five above actions will be referred to as "the project site" and the five actions will be referred as "the project". It is recognized that a significant amount of information may have already been compiled, in connection with one or more of the actions. It is advisable utilize this information and expand on it, where appropriate, to adequately address the potential impacts. The information must be presented in a single comprehensive document for the purposes of fulfilling the rules and regulations of SEQR in conjunction with this positive declaration. CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 1 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area SCOPING OUTLINE: I. Cover Sheet The EIS shall begin with a cover sheet that includes: A. That this is a draft statement B. Name or other descriptive titles of the project C. Location (county and town) of the project D. Name and address of the lead agency which required preparation of the statement and the name and telephone number of a person at the agency to be contacted for further information E. Name and address of the preparers of any portion of the statement and a contact name and telephone number F. Date of acceptance of the Draft EIS G. In the case of a Draft EIS, the deadline date by which comments are due should be indicated II. Table of Contents and Summary A table of contents and a brief summary are required for Draft EIS and Final EIS's. The summary should include: A. Brief d~scription of the actions and project as a whole. B. Significant, beneficial and adverse impacts, (issues of controversy must be specified) C. Mitigation measures proposed D. Alternative(s) considered E. Matters to be decided (permits, approvals, funding) Ill. Description of the Proposed Action PROJECT PURPOSE, NEED AND BENEFITS 1. Background and history 2. Public need for the project, and municipality objectives based on adopted community developments plans 3. Objectives of the project sponsors 4. Benefits of the proposed action a) social b) economic LOCATION 1. Establish geographic (use of regional and boundaries of the project local scale maps is CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 2 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area recommended) Description of access to site Description of existing zoning of site DESIGN AND LAYOUT 1. Composite map of pending actions a} proposed layouts b) Suffolk Cty. Tax Map No's. 2. Estimated site data a) proposed impervious surface area parking lots, roads) b) amount of land to be cleared c) open space 3. Structures, proposed number and layout 4. Proposed drainage systems 5. Sewage Disposal 6. Water Supply (roofs, CONSTRUCTION 1· Construction a) total construction period anticipated b) schedule of construction c) future potential development, on site(s) or on adjoining properties d). Suggested protection methods APPROVALS 1. Required changes or variances to regulations 2. Other permit approval or funding including but not limited to: - Town - County - State the zoning requirements IV. Environmental Setting Natural Resource A. GEOLOGY 1, Surface a) List of soil types b) discussion of soil characteristics examples: - physical properties (indication of soils capabilities and or limitations) c) agricultural soil properties - list soils by name, slope and soil CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 3 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area Be group ranking within NYS Land (1NYCRR 370) - number of acres within each group d) distribution of soil types at project site - location of soils on map e) suitability for use examples: - agriculture - recreation - construction f) subsoil discussion Topography a) description of topography at project site examples: slopes prominent or unique features b) slope analysis (example; 0-10%, 10-20%, >20%) c) description of existing drainage areas, patterns and channels WATER RESOURCES 1, Groundwater (detailed discussion) a) location and description of aquifers and recharge areas examples: depth of water table - seasonal variation - quality - quantity - direction & velocity of flow b) identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater examples: - location of existing wells - public/private water supply - industrial uses - agricultural uses c) studies and reports - Special Groundwater Protection Area (LIRPB) Water Advisory Committee of the Town of Southold - North Fork Water Supply Study 2. Surface water b) identification of uses and level of use of all surface waters d) discussion of potential for flooding, siltation, erosion and eutrophication of CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 4 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area water supply TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1. Vegetation (detailed discussion) a) list vegetation types on the project site and within the surrounding area b) discussion of site vegetation characteristics examples: - species presence and abundance - age - size - distribution - dominance - community types - unique, rare and endangered species - value as habitat for wildlife - productivity 2. Wildlife (detailed discussion) a) list of wildlife species on the project site and within surrounding area, including migratory and resident species b) discussion of wildlife population characteristics examples: - species presence and abundance - distribution - dominance - unique, rare and endangered species - productivity 3. Wetlands (detailed discussion) a) list and map wetland areas within or contiguous to the project site b} discuss wetland characteristics examples: acreage vegetative cover classification benefits of wetland such as flood and erosion control, recreation c) location and description of surface waters located on project site or those that may be influenced by the project examples: - seasonal variation - quantity - classification according to New York State Department of Health (if appropriate) CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 5 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area d) discussion of potential for flooding, siltation, erosion and eutrophication TRANSPORTATION 1. Transporting services (detailed discussion by a professional traffic engineer} a) description of the size, capacity and condition of services examples: roads intersections traffic control access/egress from site b) description of current level of and use of services examples: a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic flow vehicle mix source of existing traffic accident history capacity analysis LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Exlsting land use and zoning a) description of the existing land use of the project site and the surrounding area within a quarter of a mile of the site examples: commercial residential - agricultural - business - retail - industrial - vacant b) description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area 2. Land use plans (detailed discussion) a) description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area b) discussion of future development trends or pressures c) plans to be discussed, but not limited to: - Town Master Plan - 208 Study CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 6 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area NURPS North Fork Water Supply Suffolk County Water Authority COMMUNITY SERVICE (for this section include a list of existing facilities and a discussion of existing levels of usage and projected future needs) 2. 3. 4 5 6 7 8 9 Educational facilities Police protection Fire protection Health care facilities Social services Recreational facilities Utilities Public water supply Solid waste disposal DEMOGRAPHY 1. Population characteristics a) discussion of existing population parameters examples: distribution density household size and composition b) discussion of projections for population growth CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual resources a} description of the physical character of the community b) description of natural areas/land use patterns of local visual importance. 2. Historic and archaeological resources a) location and description of historic areas or structures listed on State or National Register or designated by the community, or included on Statewide Inventory b) identification of sites having potential significant archaeological value include results of cultural resource survey; to be conducted by qualified archaeologist. SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Identify those aspects of the environmental setting in CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 7 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area Section IV that may be adversely or beneficially affected by the proposed action and require discussion. The following is a summary of some impacts which maybe potentially large. This list is not meant to be all inclusive, nor is it true that all of these impacts may occur with the proposed project: PHYSICAL CHANGE TO THE PROJECT SITE. 1. impact on soils and topography AFFECT ON GROUNDWATER 1. adverse affect to groundwater a) water quality b) water quantity/availability c) conformance to plans and regulations THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES 1. reduction of species found on State or Federal list (if applicable) 2. loss of habitat and resultant impact on specie NON-THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES 1. interference with residence or migratory 2. loss of habitat TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS 1. level of service 2. capacity analysis 3. physical factors - curvature - site distance 4. access and safety COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. availability of services 2. projected demand LAND USE PLANS 1. compatibility/conformance 2. existing land use patterns CULTURAL 1. historic 2. pre-historic 3. visual and open space VI. MITIGATION MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 8 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area Describe measures to reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts identified in Section V. The following is a brief listing of typical measures used for some of the major areas of impact. Natural Resource A. GEOLOGY 1. Surface a) use topsoil stockpiled during construction for restoration and landscaping b) minimize disturbance of non-construction sites c) design and implement soil erosion control plan 2. Topography a) avoid construction on areas of steep slope b) design adequate soil erosion devices to protect areas of steep slope c) minimize disturbance of non-construction sites WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater a) locations of sanitary discharge b) maintain permeable areas on the site c} landscaping and landscape management plans d} stormwater controls 2. Surface water a) ensure use of soil erosion control techniques during construction and operation to avoid siltation examples: - hay bales - temporary restoration of vegetation to disturbed areas - landscaping b) design adequate stormwater control system c) restrict use of salt or sand for road and parking area snow removal d) avoid direct discharges to surface water resources TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1. Vegetation a) restrict clearing to only those areas necessary CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASsoCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 9 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area b) preserve part of site as a natural area c) after construction, landscape site with naturally occurring vegetation d) purchase open space at another location and dedicate to local government or conservation organization Wildlife a) provide adequate habitat (shelter and food) for remaining wildlife species b) schedule construction to avoid sensitive periods of wildlife cycles c) wildlife plantings to restore and/or create habitats Human Resources TRANSPORTATION 1. Transportation a) design adequate and safe access to project site to handle projected traffic flow b) install adequate traffic control devices or roadway configurations LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Existing land use and zoning a) design project to comply with existing land use plans and studies b) design functional and visually appealing facility to set standard and precedent for future surrounding land use COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. Police protection a) provide equipment, funds, or services directly to the community 2. Fire protection a} provide equipment, funds or services directly to the community 3. Utilities a) install utility services underground b) incorporate water saving fixtures into facility design c) incorporate energy-saving measures into facility design CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual resources ,CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 10 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area a) minimize visual impact through thoughtful. and innovative design b) design landscaping to be visually pleasing and to serve as a buffer between surrounding land uses c) preservation of existing vegetation Historic and archaeological resources a) Prepare a plan, including measures to mitigate impacts to historic/ archaeological resources through data recovery, avoidance and/or restriction of project activities b) develop measures to convey cultural information to the community (e.g. through scientific/popular reports, displays) c) preserve architecturally significant structures and make an adequate permanent photographic and statistical record of those that must be destroyed VII. ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF TIIE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED Identify tho~e adverse environmental effects is Section that can be expected to occur regardless of the mitigation ~neasures considered in Section VI. VII. ALTERNATIVES This section contains categories of alternatives with examples. Discussion of each alternative should be at a level sufficient to permit a comparative assessment of costs, benefits and environmental risks for each alternative. It is not acceptable to make simple assertions that a particular alternative is or is not feasible. Identify those categories of alternatives which should be included in the EIS by placing a check in the box located to the left of the topic. ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGIES (detailed discussion, can be combined with VII-B below) 1. Site layout a) density and location of structures b) location of access routes, parking and utility routes 2. Orientation a) compatibility with slope and drainage CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND ~LA~INiNG CONSULTANTS Page 11 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area patterns b) site size and set back requirements Technology a) pollution control equipment b) innovative vs. proven technologies Mix of activities a) townhouses b) large lots ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT(S) (discussions and maps; maps can be conceptual in nature but should provide sufficient detail in order to assess potential impacts and/or desirability of alternative layouts) 1. Limiting factors a) availability of land b) suitability of alternative layout to accommodate design requirements c) suitable market area d) compatibility with local zoning and master plan e) compatibility with regional objectives ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION/OPERATION SCHEDULING 1. Commence construction at a different time 2. Phase construction/operation 3. Restrict construction/operation work schedule NO ACTION 1. Impacts of no action a) effect on public need b) effect on private developers' need c) beneficial or adverse environmental impacts Public acquisition of portion and/or total area. a) public need b) public benefit/impact c) environmental need/benefit/impact IX. IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES Identify those natural and human resources listed in Section IV that will be consumed, converted or made unavailable for future use. X. GROWTH INDUCING ASPECTS CRAMER, voOR-~'i~ '':;~ a ~SSOCIATES ENVlRONMI=NTAI~.4~D, ~I~]~NING CONSULTANTS Page 12 of 13 Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area Describe in this section the potential growth aspects : the proposed project may have. Listed below are examples of topics that are typically affected by the growth induced by a project. POPULATION 1. Increases in resident population due construction of housing to the SUPPORT FACILITIES 1. Business and community service demand created to serve the increased population DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 1. Introduction or improvement of infrastructure (roads, waste disposal, sewers, water) to service proposed project 2. Creation of further growth potential by construction of improved infrastructure XI. APPENDICES Following is a list of materials typically used in support of the EIS. A. List of underlying studies, reports and information considered and relied on in preparing the statement agencies, consulted List all federal, state, regional, or local organizations, consultants and private persons in preparing the statement C. Technical exhibits (if any) at a legible scale D. Relevant correspondence regarding the projects may be included (required in the Final EIS) CRAMER, VOORHIS, &: ''''~ SOCIATES ENVIRONMENTA~.~.~_~N_O, PLANNING CONSULTANTS '~ 9.,~,'/ ,,\% Page 13 of 13 WILLIAM WICKHAM ABIGAIL A. WICKHAM DANiel C ROSS KAREN ~J HAGEN HUBERT F. SULLIVAN LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, P.C. mAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX ~424 MATTItUCK, LONG ISLAND NEW YOrK I)952 516-298-8353 TELEFAX NO, 516-298-8565 4 1939 August 9, 1989 Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Peconic Homes Corporation Gentlemen: On behalf of Peconic Homes Corporation we are enclosing form of proposed resolution with respect to the environmental issues affecting this application. We are submitting this action as a result of the Scoping Session held on July 13, 1989, at which time it became apparent that the proposal for a Generic Environmental Impact Statement would not be possible. The resolution reflects the current status of the various applications and recognizes that in the absence of A.T. Holding Corporation there is no logical reason to proceed with the SEQRA process as originally proposed. We would appreciate your prompt attention to these resolutions and your advice as to whether the same are satisfactory. Very truly yours, Eric J~ EJB/jtz Enc. WHEREAS, Peconic Homes Corporation applied to this Board on May 5, 1988, for approval of a subdivision plot for a major subdivision of 45 acres located at Sound Avenue, Mattituck, NY (project); and WHEREAS, such application was made after a prior minor subdivision application for the same property was not approved; and WHEREAS, Peconic Homes Corporation submitted a completed Environmental Assessment - Part 1 in conjunction with its application; and WHEREAS, this Board granted sketch plan approval for the project on July 11, 1988 subject to the relocation of two lots on the sketch plan map; and WHEREAS, this Board assumed lead agency status with respect to the SEQRA review for the project on June 5, 1989; and WHEREAS, this Board issued a positive declaration under SEQRA on June 5, 1989, based upon the assertion that although the project was an unlisted action, the cumulative effect of the project together with pending applications by A.T. Holding Co., Joseph Macari, Daniel Jacoby, and Douglas Miller, all in the area of Laurel Lake would be equivalent to a Type I action (Laurel Lake Development); and WHEREAS, the proposed A.T. Holding Co., application involves approximately 91 acres, which comprises approximately 41% of the acreage in the Laurel Lake development; and WHEREAS, a scoping session was held on July 13, 1989, at which time a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) was requested with respect to the Laurel Lake Development; and WHEREAS, Thomas Kramer, acting on behalf of the Planning Board, recommended the filing of individual Draft Environmental Impact Statements (DEIS) as alternatives to the filing of a GEIS in order to expedite the approval process; and WHEREAS, A.T. Holding Co. has failed to respond to written notices from this Board regarding participation in a scoping session and failed to appear at the scoping session held on July 13, 1989; and WHEREAS, the application of Daniel Jacoby involves the subdivision of a 10.58 acre parcel into only two lots; and WHEREAS, Douglas Miller has commenced an action against the Planning Board seeking approval of his subdivision and has indicated his unwillingness to participate in a GEIS; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is impractical to require a GEIS with respect to the Laurel Lake development due to the non-participation of A.T. Holding Co., the pending action by Douglas Miller, and the insignificant nature of the Jacoby application; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that in the absence of A. T. Holding Co., and Douglas Miller and the insignificant nature of the Jacoby application that there is no longer a cumulative impact of such nautre as to justify a positive declaration pursuant to SEQRA; now THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Peconic Homes Corporation SEQRA application be declared a completed draft environmental impact statement; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the positive declaration rendered July 5, 1989 pursuant to SEQRA be and the same hereby is rescinded and a negative declaration is hereby made under SEQRA. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 CERTIFIED MAIL PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: All Involved Applicants Southold Town Planning Board DATE: July 6, 1989 Scoping Session for: Peconic Homes SCTM 91000-121-5-5.1 Douglas Miller SCTM $1000-121-4-10.1 Daniel Jacoby SCTM ~1000-125-1-5 Joseph Macari SCTM ~1000-121-4-9. A.T. Holding Co. SCTM ~1000-121-5-5.1 This is to confirm the Scoping Session date of Thursday, 13, 1989 at 2 p.m. for the above mentioned subdivision applications. July The Scoping Session will be held in the Meeting Hall of the Town Hall which is located on the Main Road in Southold. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Board office at 765-1938. jt Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Henry Raynor George Guldi Peter Danowski James Fitzgerald James A. Schondebare. Town Attorney Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 CERTIFIED MAIL PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: Ail Involved Agencies Southold Town Planning Board Scoping Session for: Peconic Homes SCTM 91000-121-5-5.1 Douglas Miller SCTM ~1000-121-4-10.1 Daniel Jacoby SCTM ~1000-125-1-5 Joseph Macari SCTM ~1000-121-4-9. A.T. Holding Co. SCTM ~1000-121-5-5.1 DATE: July 6, 1989 A Scoping Session has been set for Thursday, July 13, 1989 at 2 p.m. for the above mentioned subdivision applications. The Scoping Session will be held in the Meeting Hall of the Town Hall which is located on the Main Road in Southold. A copy of the Positive Declaration was sent to you under separate cover. If you are unable to attend the Scoping Session, please send any comments you may have as to items you wish be addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, to the Planning Board office. For your assistance, the Board's fax number is 765-1823. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Board office at 765-1938. CC: jt Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of.Environmental Conservation Suffolk County Department of Planning James Schondebare, Town Attorney Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Zoning Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 IELEPHONE (516) 76~-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD J~Sy 24, 1989 Henry Raynor 320 Loue Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Peconic Homes SCTM ~1000-121-5-5.1 Dear Mr. Raynor: The fee for the environmental review of application will total two thousand dollars. However, the Planning Board has been billed for the review to date, which'is two hundred and fifty dollars. Please pay the two hundred and fifty dollars upon receipt of this letter. Thank you for your coorporation. the above mentioned y yours, CHAIRMAN cc: Cramer, Voorhis & Associates Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 3une 24, 1989 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Peconic Homes SCTM 91000-121-5-5.1 Dear Mr. Raynor: The fee for the environmental review of the above mentioned application will total two thousand dollars. However, the Planning Board has been billed for the review to date, which is two hundred and fifty dollars. Please pay the two hundred and fifty dollars upon receipt of this letter. Thank you for your coorporation. Verily yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. /~ CHAI~ cc: Cramer, Voorhis & Associates WlLUAN WlCKHAN !.~,W OFFICES WICKHANI, WlCKHANI 8~ BRE$$LER, June 19, 1989 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Horton Subdivision Application-Laurel Gentlemen: We have been retained in connection with the Horton's subdivision application and the positive SEQRA declaration with respect to this project. We have been advised that a tentative date of July 6th, 1989 at 2 p.m. has been set for the ecoping session. We ask that you keep us advised of any further dates regarding this matter. EJB/jtz ll3-Horton Eri~. Bressler Toxvn Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box I 179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD June 12, 1989 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Applications in Laurel Lake Area which received a Positive Declaration on June.5, 1989 Dear Mr. Raynor: Enclosed please find the Town Board resolution Qf June 6, 1989, which may be of significance to your client. Noted below are three tentative dates for the scoping session which the Planning Board will be conducting. Please notify the Planning Board office by June 16th as to which date is most convenient for you. You will be notified of the confirmed date and time. July 6, 1989 - no specified time July 7, 1989 - no specified time July 12, 1989 -no specified time Please contact the office if you have any questions pertaining to the above. enc. V truly your CHAIRMAN ms Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNRqG BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 7, 1989 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Peconic Homes SCTM #1000-121-3-7 1000-125-1-p/o 5. Dear Mr. Raynor: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 5, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board issue a Positive Declaration under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The Planning Board, as lead agent, determined that the proposed action described in the enclosed positive declaration may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statment will be prepared. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly y. ours, .. ~ ' / enc. Toxvn Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 7, 1989 POSITIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT to Part 617 of Article 8 of the Environmental Conser- vation Law, the Southold Town Planning Board assumes lead agency, and, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed actions described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement shall be prepared. NAME OF ACTION: A.T. Holding Co. Joseph Macari Peconic Homes Daniel Jacoby Douglas Miller SCTM$ 1000-121-5-5.1 1000-122-2-25 34 lots on 91.53 acres. SCTM# 1000-121-4-9 - 27 lots on 63.57 acres. SCTM# 1000-121-3-7 1000-121-1- p/o 5 19 lots on 45.28 acres. SCTM# 1000-125-1-5 2 lots on 10.58 acres. SCTM 9 1000-121-4-10.1 3 lots on 8.2 acres. SEQRA STATUS: Each of the individual actions around~the Lake is, in effect, an unlisted action, but the cumulative effect is akin to a Type I action. **CONTINUED** REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: There are three major and two minor subdivision proposals which together encompass approximately 219 acres and 85 lots in the vicinity of Laurel Lake; and There should be consideration of the potential cumulative effect of the proposed development on the ecology of the area with regard to the overall impacts on groundwater quality, s~rface water quality, wildlife habitat, and public lands; and The Laurel Lake area has been under study as a special groundwater protection area by the Long Island Regional Planning Board's Special Groundwater Protection Area A~visory Council; and The stretch of Sound Avenue between Bergen Avenue to t~ewest and Cox Neck Road to the east is the sole point of iP~xes$ a~d egress, and none of these subdivisions has additional access to other public roads. This stretch of road is a heavily travelled east-west corridor and also a curving road on hilly~xraino Its capacity to handle safely the additional volume o~ ~xaffic from the projected development should be examined. CONTACT PERSON: Further information can be obtained by contacti~Jill Thorp, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board, Main Southold, NY 11971. CC: jt suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Depamtment of Environmental Cons~tiom, SB Suffolk County Depaztment of Planning Judith Terr~, Town Clerk Build/ng Department Zoning Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Planning Board Applicant ' P.O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY March 6, 1989 11947 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: ....... $0UTF OLD T ?~.~ I have been ~equested by Melissa Spiro ~f yuu~ office to temporarily hold the preliminary maps on Peconic Homes. As we have already waited in excess of thirty days to accomodate your Board, I would appreciate an expeditious and favorable determination, i.e. negative declaration under SEQRA, and continue to process same. Best regards, HER:ml CC: Horton Howard Young Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY March 18, 1989 11947 RE: Peconic Homes major subdivision at Laurel, New York Dear Mc. Orlowski: With regard to the above referenced, we are still awaiting your Board's determination with respect to the negative declaration under SEQRA. We would like to proceed with preliminary maps immediately and await your response. Sincerely, HER:ml CC: Horton DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. CO&IMI$$1ONER February 6, 1989 Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Laurel Lake Subdivisions - SEQRA Evaluation (Daniel Jacoby: SCTM # 1000-125-1-5) (Joseph Marcafi: SCTM # 1000-121-4-9) (A.T. Holding Corp.: SCTM # 1000-121-5-1 & 1000-122-2-25) (Peconic Homes: SCTM # 1000-121-3-7 & 1000-125-1 & p/o 2) Dear Ms. Scopaz: The Suffolk County Department of Health Service (SCDHS) has reviewed the above-referenced proposals. We have no objection to Town's designation as lead agency. Based on our preliminary review, we strongly believe that the potential for project- specific and cumulative negative environmental impacts is significant. Specifically, we believe that independently, the proposed actions pose potential significant impacts on groundwater, surface water, freshwater wetlands, wildlife habitat, and public lands resources within a similar geographical area. In addition, the close proximity of these proposals and their collective location within a designated Special Groundwater Protection Area (SGPA), supports a COUNTY C£NTE[~ RIVERHEAD, N,Y. I 19OI Letter to Valerie Scopaz February 6, 1989 Page 2 comprehensive assessment of short- and long-term cumulative impacts on the Laurel Lake area. As a result, we recommend that the above-mentioned proposals (and others which may be proposed in their vicinity) be reviewed collectively through a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GELS). We believe the need for a Laurel Lake GElS is well supported by the implementing rules and regulations for the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) which state in pertinent part that: "A Generic ElS may be used to assess the environmental effects of: (1) a number of separate actions in a given geographic area which, if considered singly may have only minor effects, but if considered together may have significant effects; or .... (3) separate actions having generic or common impacts..." [NYCRR: Part 617.15 (a)] The GElS can provide government agencies and the general public with an accurate impact assessment of the overall development of this area, and identify mitigation measures necessary to minimize potential impacts to the entire affected area (not simply individual site specific measures). Also, we are confident that a GElS for the entire 211-acre (approximate) development area will reduce duplication of efforts by the applicants and involved agencies, which may well occur in the event of independent, segmented reviews of each application. Finally, we believe the most valuable function of a GElS for the Laurel Lake area would be its identification and discussion of design altematives. Responsibly undertaken, this part of the document would provide a detailed assessment of altematives and project designs and comprehensive planning strategies [i.e., transfer of Letter to Valerie Scopaz February 6, 1989 Page 3 development rights (TDR), clustering, partial/total acquisition, etc.] intended to minimize potential negative impacts on the overall study area. We appreciate the opportunity to review these proposals and have enclosed a separate scoping outline which identifies content areas we would like to see addressed in a Laurel Lake GELS. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 548-3060. Sincerely, Robed S. DoLuca Biologist Office of Ecology CC: Vito Minei, P.E. Louise Harrison Stephen Costa, P.E Charles Lind, S.C. Planning Dept. Frank Panek, NYSDEC Enc. RECOMMENDED SCOPING OUTLINE FOR A LAUREL LAKE GElS I. DescriDtion of the ProDosed Actions; A. Location The document should contain detailed design drawings and include Suffolk County Tax Map numbers for the overall project sites. B. Sanitary Code Compliance The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of water supply and sanitary sewage disposal systems. We recommend, therefore, that the document provide a detailed discussion of the regulations and compliance requirements of our agency as they apply to the proposed development and the potential alternatives to the proposed actions. In addition, the document should outline the Article VI application status of the proposed projects, and explain proposed methods of compliance with the appropriate requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC). General statements regarding the applicants' intentions to comply with all appropriate SCDHS standards should not be considered sufficient detail for this portion of the document. If the applicants have not yet submitted applications for realty subdivision approval to our agency, applications should be submitted at the earliest possible date so our staff may provide technical comments. C. Water Supply The document should discuss in detail sufficient for technical assessment, the water supply requirements for the proposed actions and should demonstrate water supply availability. D. Wetlands Delineation Wetlands and water bodies must be represented accurately on property surveys and site plans submitted to our agency for review. Proposals with inaccurate information regarding wetlands and surface waters cannot be evaluated for yield, equivalent density, or proper locations of sewage disposal systems or water supply facilities. I1. Environmental Setting A. Groundwater Quality 1. We are concerned about potential groundwater quality impacts associated with the overall development of the study area, especially with respect to potential impacts on wetlands and surface waters. We recommend that the GElS evaluate potential groundwater impacts in the study area with specific attention to the potential impacts on Laurel Lake and its associated freshwater wetlands. The entire GElS study area is located within one of the Special Groundwater Protection Areas (SGPA) designated by the Long Island Regional Planning Board (LIRPB). The LIRPB has made substantive general recommendations regarding zoning and land use, aimed at protecting these area's groundwater resources. We encourage the Town to require discussion of the LIRPB's recommendations for these designated areas relative to the proposed actions and alternatives being evaluated in the GELS. B. Wildlife Habitat Identification and Protection 1. The document should provide a detailed assessment of the study area's terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. This section of the study should provide a detailed cover map of the study area and include the results of an on-site species inventory. (The document should not contain merely a predetermined list of probable species found in habitats similar to the subject study area.) In addition, the dates of all field studies and qualifications of the individual(s) conducting the investigations should be included in the document for review. The document should identify potential short- and long-term impacts to wildlife species and habitat as a result of the proposed actions. Information pertaining to rere and endangered species, habitat fragmentation, area-sensitive species, and loss of indigenous natural communities is important to this discussion. The document should evaluate (in detail sufficient for comparative assessment) project design alternatives which maximize protection of contiguous natural areas and provide for the highest diversity of natural habitat types. We are especially concerned about the full protection of any areas providing habitat for rare and endangered species. 4. Sources of information pertaining to rare, threatened and endangered species should be stated in the GELS. We recommend the discussion be supplemented with information obtained from the regional office of NYSDEC and the New York State Natural Heritage Program. The Natural Heritage Program offers a Significant Habitat Information Service (518- 439-7486), and can be contacted at the following address: New York State Natural Heritage Program Wildlife Resources Center Delmar, New York 12054 C. New York State Regulations and Requirements 1. Development of parcels within the study area will be subject to regulation and review by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), pursuant to Article 24 Freshwater Wetlands Act of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law. The GElS should outline the regulatory requirements of the State pursuant to the above legislation and discuss how the proposed projects affected by this regulation will satisfy State permitting standards and policies. The document should provide a detailed base map of the study area which includes NYSDEC-approved wetland delineations, and regulatory limits. Imoacts on Public Lands and Historic Resources The GElS study area should include discussion of public lands of the NYDSEC and Camp Malloy. We are especially concerned about potential development impacts to the NYSDEC preserve property, and fishing opportunities on Laurel Lake. Also, we are concerned about any potential impacts on historic resources as a result of proposed development projects. We recommend, therefore, that the GElS include historic resources data for this area and a historical and archeological impact analysis for any of the proposed projects which may be necessary. E. Alternatives The GElS should provide appropriate design altematives with site plans which are suitable for comparative assessment. We recommend that alternative designs seek to maximize protection of the study area's natural habitats, freshwater wetlands, and water resources comprehensively, and be presented in an objective manner. Alternatives which unquestionably have greater impacts than the desired actions are inappropriate. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($16) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Mr. Raynor: January 12, 1989 RE: Peconic Homes SCTM 91000-121-3-7 SCTM #1000-125-1-p/o The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, January 9, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold Town P~anning Board start the coordination process to determine Lead Agency and Environmental Significance on the following: Peconic Homes- SCTM #1000-121-3-7/1000-125-1-p/o 5 Joseph Macari- SCTM 91000-121-4-9 A.T. Holding Co.- SCTM 91000-121-5-8/1000-122-2-25 Daniel Jacoby- SCTM 91000-125-1-5 PLEASE NOTE THE FURTHER EXPLANATION ENCLOSED. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. ~truly y~ur~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAI~ enc. WHEREAS, the stretch of Sound Avenue between Bergen Avenue to the west and Cox Neck Road to the east is the sole point of access and exit for four major and one minor subdivision proposal which in total encompass 210.96 acres and 84 Lots; and WHEREAS, none of these subdivisions have ready access to other public roads for additional access; and WHEREAS, this stretch of road is a winding, and curving road on hilly terrain, its capacity to handle safely the additional volume of traffic from the projected development is in question; and WHEREAS, this stretch of road is a heavily travelled east-west corridor; and WHEREAS, these particular applications are in the vicinity of Laurel Lake, there should be consideration of the potential cumulative impact of the proposed development on the area with regard to potential stormwater runoff, septic system leaching, groundwater quality and loss of habitat; and WHEREAS, the applications lie adjacent.to or within, whether ~wholly or in part, the Core Watershed Protection Area which has been designated by the Town Board (January 19, 1988) as a study area; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Water Advisory Committee has been reviewing land use management practices in this area, and the Core Watershed Protection Area has also been included as a special groundwater protection area by the LIRPB'S Special Groundwater Protection Area Advisory Council; and WHEREAS, these individual actions around the Lake are in effect, unlisted actions, the cumulative effect is akin to a Type I action, and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that The Southold Planning Board hereby assumes lead agency status in the review of the following applications: A.T. Holding Co,. SCTM# 121-5-18 and 122-2-25 (34 lots, 91.53A) Joseph Macari SCTM# 121-4-9 (27 lots 63.57A) ~ Peconic Homes SCTM# 121-3-7 and 121-1 p/o 5 (19 lots, 45.28A) Daniel Jacoby SCTM#125-1-5 (4 lots 10.58 acres) and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that The Planning Board hereby determines that the cumulative impact of-the above noted applications, for the above mentioned reasons, is likely to have an adverse environmental impact. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 7654935 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 12, 1989 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. your interest in assUming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Peconic Homes, Inc. SCTM #1000-121-3-7/125-]-p/o5 Requested Action: Applicant proposes to subdivide a 45.2763 ac:re parcel into 19 clustered lots ranqinq in size from 40,000 s.f. to 46,000. s.f. located at Laurel. SEQRA Classification: [XX~ Type I [ ] Unlisted Contact Person: Jill M. Thorp 516-765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you ~Rve an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ~XX] This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. [ ] This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [ x~ Other. (See comments below) Comments: See attached resolution. Please feel free to contact this office for further information. cc: _~oard of Appeals ~Board of Trustees ~Building Department ~Southold Town Board *~Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services *~,NYSDEC- Stony Brook v_NYSDEC- Albany ~S.C. Dept. of Public Works ~L~p ~f En~inc~rs ~N.Y.S. Dept. of Transportation BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ~'~ CHAIRM~_N * Maps are enclosed for your review ~,' Coordinating agencies P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY August 4, 1988 1194 AUG - 4 Igl)8 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Copies of the revised sketch plan for Peconic Homes major subdivision at Laurel, New York have been delivered to your office under separate cover. These sketches meet the requirements put forward by your Board and Town Planner, Valerie Scopaz. We are initiating preliminary maps to be forwarded to your Board as rapidly as possible. Please forward any requirements pertaining to SEQRA as soon as possible on this subdivision. Best r~gards, ~ Henry E. Raynor, J~. HER:M1 CC: Peconic Homes, Howard Young Inc. Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 G~r~y Horton Kirkup Lane Mattitud~w~NY 11952 July 13, 1988 RE: Peconic Homes SCTM #1000-121-3-7 Dear Mr. Horton: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 11, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch plan approval for this major subdivision, subject to moving Lot #9 north of Lot~and moving Lot #3 away from the transmission lines. This parcel'is on 34.3 acres located at Mattituck. Upon receipt of revised maps the Planning Board will begin the SEQRA process. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. uly yours, _ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ~ - CHAIRMAN jt P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY May 5, 1988 11947 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Under separate cover I have hand delivered the complete package for major subdivision requirements for Peconic Homes, Inc. situated at Laurel, New York. I would appreciate this major subdivision being placed for sketch plan action at the Board's earliest agenda. sincerely, HER:ml CC: Peconic Homes, Inc. or formerly Eugene ~ Dav/$on MINOR SUBDIVISION PREPARED FOR PECONIC HOMES, INC. AT MATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. ~ /`9 °54 'oo '~ Or JOSeph 48,0 4~ 49.0 35 5 or fOrmerly NOTE~ OWNER PECONIC He, lES CORP, PO. BOX 21 NEW SUFFOLK, N.Y. 11956 MOtor~ Kalhryn now or formerly James ~ Mulv/hdl ' i 43.5 220' M John KU/~wsk/ 8 KEY MAP A":::'EA,, I0o,ooo + q.~. ~§- formqrly ~ G \~ \0 or fOrmerly Eugene f~ Dawson 20°02 STANDARD SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN PREPARED FOR PECONIC HOMES, INC. AT MATT~TUCK TOWN OFSOUTHOLD SUFFOLKCOUNTY, N.Y. OWNER PECONIC HOMES CORP PO BOX 21 NEW SIIFFOLK+N¥ 11958 now NOTE: now 54 Or dOSeph // 200' or fOrmer/y CONTOURS, ELEVATIONS, MARSHES~AND LiNE Of WOODS, SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM "TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP- FIVE EASTERN TOWNS," PREPARED FOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 81000 185' domes ~ Mu/v/h/// ~25°10 '50 'E ' 291.08 '- "--"> 240' LILO0 ON6 SITE; DATA: TC¢I'AL AREA = 45.2743 ACRES ZC'NIN6 USE DISTRICT: "A" RESiDENTIAL-AGRICULTURE TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS = [9 TCCI'AL LENGTH OF ROADS = 401;5 L.E ASsocz~tes J RIGHT OF WAY FOR LOT OWNERS now Or formef/y / Cure~ PrOperties 50196 or formerly Eugene /~ Dawson CLUSTER SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN PREPARED FOR PECONIC HOMES, INC. AT. MATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. OWNER YOUNG ~ YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVE., RIVERHEAD~N.Y. ALDEN W. YOUNG, NY.S. PE. ~ L.~,LIC* N0,12845 HOWARD W YOUNS~ N~S L,S. LIC NO 45893 Or MaCar/ ROW or fOrmer/y NOTE' I, CONTOURS~ELEVATIONS, MARSHES~AND LINE OF WOODS~SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM "TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP- FIVE EASTERN TOWNS," PREPARED FOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 2. GUFF. CO. TAX MAP. DIST IOOO SECT ~21 BL o3 LOT ? DIST IQO0 SECT 125 SL SITE DATA- I, TOTAL AREA = 45 2?63 ACRES 2. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS -'19 3. ZONING USE DIS~RICT ~ "A" RESIDENT[AL -AGRICULTURE now or formerly James V Muir~h/Il FRESHWATER WETLANDS . 50 E 291 08 4OO00t S.F \ PROPOSED ~ ROAD C(3.¢R~TE ~ LONG ISLAND LIGHT[NS OOMPANy now Formveu CLUSTER CALCULATION-SECTION 2 AREA = I1.0 ACRES o LOTS ELECTRIC LOTS ~ESERVED FOR LOT OWNERS 4200~8.E formerly PrOperh~$ 50[96 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP PREPARE D FOR PECONIC HOMES, INC ... AT MATTITUCK '"T'Q..WN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y 2 0 Dso DATE SEP, 6 ~ 1989 SCALE t`'= I00 NO 88 - 0272 now Eugene 30, 489 × 468" 4~xo 741 56' now '51 "E ./ 40000*~F or former~ Joseph / / 4t F )PEN or formerly Dovison 376 X X or PRAINIAGE CAL~IJLAT ON.5 x :;ITL DATA I TOTAL AR~A- ,45 3 t ACRE5 2 TOfAL NUMBLR uF LUTS=I9 %ZONING UbE DIS"RICT · AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION 4 fOTA[ L.LNGTH OF ROAD =~600':~ 5. AREA OF OPEN SPACE = 21.6 '~ACRES OWNER: PECONIC HOMES CORP ~0, BOX El NEW SUFFOLK, N~ 11958 now or formertY V. Mutvihill LINES 0 X K /" 7 now or formerly / Aldo Jahler ...~. OpEN 21 K 555' SPACE 23.0C N 33°00 LAUREL LAKE o~ NOTES I CONTOURS~ELFVATI~N.S MARSHES~ANOLINE OF WOODS~SHOWNHEREON / ARE FROM TOPOGRAPHI~L MAP PREPARES BY LOCKWOOD,KESSLER ,/ ~?,/ L~>~TION MAP / / 676.62 // / o.~oo~. iJ~l (Z) :oUoll~ ~.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ ~ o ~ ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 0 0 ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ o o o ~-o o o o o ~ 0~o ~ + ~ o u0 ~ o PROFILE ROAD SCALE VERT : I"=10: 4- o o~ PROFILE ROAD SCALI~ HORIZ,, I"= 50' VERT= I" = I0' 0 a3 0 0 O o o PROFILE ROAD SCALE HORIZ. '~= 50' VERT :1"=10' ~.1¢,. kJo. I~. I.~=9Z5 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 LO PRELIIVIlNARY SUBDIVISION MAP PREPARED FOR PECONIC HOMES, INC. AT MA-I-TITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. gATE: SEPT 6, 1969 NO, 88 - 027Z