Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-121.-2-1T,r- ,/ ,~ DA M So ,V :om..¢,..~, ^~.~o. 22~ 30" I,%1150 00' · ,,-,,~ ,,,, ,,, /V'4- C,q- ,~P,4 ~ (509 NOTE: DO NOT SCALE DRAWiI~, CoNC 1"=30' ZSL,-AND ~.,~' ~ MEDIAN PLLdF CoNTRol. Foafl De-raiL BOP:lNG No. 'i ,o PATF- : k~. 19, IflP~P~ _FIFIN& 5CHBHAflc Pi,OF. Ad PHH P . I APPRO\ED BY PLANNING BOARD TOWN_OF SOUTHOLD RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the chairman to endorse the final maps dated as follows Page 1 of 2, dated November 22, 1988; Page 2 of 2, dated May L6, 1988, as numbered by Jill Thorp, Secretary to th~ ~lanning Bo~trd. This site plan was approved on April 11, 1988 subj(!ot to the following: changing the nam~ of the map and marking the Fire Well on the map. These requlrements have been met. 6-0 SANITARy LEACHING PO()L R~Y FlAP Fo~. EXI~'fN~ N~LL6 ,t \ ....... W~PL cav~F. P~INi~MN No 5c~p~ NOTES' It II PLAN SECTION A-A LEACHING BASIN DEI'A~L . ON SITE_ DOME!' SEPTIC , IJ 8' DIA. U TYP.STANDARDCONC.CURB & STREET REPAIR ~ N LEGEND KEY MAP PROPERTY INFORMATION ~UFFOLK GOUH'I'Y TAX HAP NblHIB~I~ 100o IZI 02. - 01 DISTRICT- 9[~.TION- ~bOCK- LOT ITEH AF-~A OF 5rrb; 60,070 SF 8NIL. PlN'~ A~.~; (J. 000 ~ F PAYf:HF. NT AP~.A ;. 3&j, oo s F ~ ND~cAPi~D AF, BA ' I 6.Z1o 5P Fgol'~r~6[:; ~lq~ L F PARKING CALCULATIONS RETAIl- 6,qoo ~F (,oo TO'TAp 6pAcF.-B TOTAL PRON'IPFD ~ G7 B. LI&HT BNBIU~:5~q RET,~ H. ;ENERAL NOTES L A~ gOIZ. KTO ¢oNF~H TO TIlE LMTI. 5'f 2, A~ ~kgvArl~ A~ ON U,6C, ~l ~ 2B DAy I-~I::~SAP£ DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS ASPHALT ~o~/F~ AfopHALT q-4-6,5 CF ~lq = IGG, % 1,8'12.,~ CF : Z_01.O C,F SANITARY CALCULATIONS cgll~lA LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE HAI~K ~orANIC~L- NAHE CoFIrlON NANg LIGHTING SCHEDULE-- I THE $1'IOppEs AT ~-IZE Z~k"- q5 ~,~_R, MIDDLE ROAD ~,dO ,AMLEi~K GREAT NECK, NEW ~RK' ii ' ARCHITECTS PLANNERS SMffHTOWN (516) 72. 71~] / PORT JEffERSON STA /5]5) 331.8555 l~'~ '~1 .,~.~,,. ,,,,,.,,~ /I,,='*1 - "/Idatel n'~ "'T.t. 4,4.8 4.4.. ~ EL ,¢.4. Z. ~ oo&'AL. T.C.4-4-. 3 · ,5'R , B-c- w. CONC. / / IDc...c,~. 4Z.& ~HoUl.:f~ ~ klHl'rE. 14~tE pAV~. TO &~A£ ~ HP_.DtAN /V£ cK -:(so') FEB ? ,4 IgS~' SOUIHOLD PLANNING BOAP Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($!6) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 13, 1989 Scott Accardo Miller Associates 931 Hallock Avenue Port Jefferson, NY 11776 RE: The Shoppes at Mattituck SCTM 01000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. Accardo: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Plannning Board on Monday, March 13, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final maps dated as follows: Page 1 of 2, dated November 22, 1988; Page 2 of 2, dated May 16, 1988, as numbered by Jill Thorp, Secretary to the Planning Board. This site plan was approved on April 11, 1988 subject to the following: changinq the name of the map and marking the Fire Well on the map. These requirements have been met. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. CHAIRMAN CC: Building Department Assessor's I> I - ) ' I ~'ra/~@~'a''~ TSUNIS, GASPARIS & DRAGOTTA, LLP JOHN C. TSUNIS MARIA GASPARIS ROY S. DRAGO1-FA EVANS. TANENBAUM* *Also admitted in D.C. OF COUNSEL SCOTT DE SIMONE OFFICE MANAGER DEBRA $ANGENITO PARALEGAL SHARON CAPOBIANCO May 10, ~00~g Southold Town Clerk's Office Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: SLA Application of Giacomo & Son Pizzaria, Inc. d/b/a The Sicilian 55 Rt. 48, Mattltuck, New York /~t' Dear Sir or Madam: Our office represents Giacomo & Son Pizzaria, Inc. d/b/a The Sicilian. Please accept this writing as notice, pursuant to Section 6{.¢(a) of the Alcohol Beverage Control Law, that, in not less than thirty days, our client will be submitting an application to the New York State Liquor Authority for an Eating Place Beer License. Shotdd you have any questions in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. RECEIVED Southold Town Clerk 5';outhold Towr~ CC: Town Board Town Attorney Police Dept Fire Marshal ZBA PB Code Enf. 801 MOTOR PARKVVAY, HAUPPAUGE, LONG ISLAND, NY 11788 * TEL: 631-582-4000 * FAX: 631-582-4081 · e-maihtsunis.gaspads@prodigy.net 7001 2510 0006 67~2 42~ TSUNIS, GASBARIS & DR~AGOTT. A, LLP 801 MOTOR PARKWAY, HAUPPAUGE, LONG ISLAND, NY 11788 ~x-f-tu~/x, ~,u/ ,//'tV/ ..... i ........ l'"il"'lll, h,l,,,h,,lll,h,t,l,,i,t,,t,l,,,t,i,,hl,,i,l,l PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer ~ Request for review for The Shoppes at Mattituck CR 48, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-121-2-1 September 28, 2001 The Planning Board has received your request for review of the above project. The site plan was approved on March 13, 1989, with 6,700 square feet of retail area. The parking was calculated at 100 square feet of retail area for each parking space. This calculation resulted in 67 spaces proved at the site, including three handicapped spaces. Present parking calculations for retail use are 200 square feet of retail area for each parking space. Thus the present parking is more than adequate for the new store. There will be no exterior changes to the fagade and a sign permit will be required. In light of the above, the Board requests that a decision be made by the Building Department whether a site plan is required. ¥o o~ ~ ~ p~/ . MEMORANDUM: TO: FROM: RE: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman~.0.?~/~ Cox Neck Shopping Plaza Route 48 & Cox Neck Road, Mattituck SCTM9 1000-121-2-1 The attached sign and site plan showing the location of the sign meets with the Board's approval. The sign should not have any more panels than the number of stores in the center. SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM~: COM~ENTS: $OUTHOLD TOWN ' · PLANNING BOARD j FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-20264 Date OCTOBER 4, 1991 THIS CERTIFIES that the building SHOPPING CENTER Location of Property 55 COUNTY RD. #48 & 120 COX NECK RD. MATTITUCK~NY House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 121 Block 2 Lot 1 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated JULY 31~ 1990 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 19284-Z dated JULY 31~ 1990 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is SHOPPING CENTER CONTAINING EIGHT STORES AS APPLIED FOR. * The certificate is issued to MIDDLE ROAD SHOPPING CENTER (owners) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL C10-87-016 - JAN. 18~ 1991 UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N170175 - JAN. 18~ 1991 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED FEB. 15~ 1991 - HENRY G. LANGE~ JR. *THIS CO IS ISSUED ON THE EXPLICIT REPRESENTATION MADE TO THE PLANNING BOARD BY AUGIE MALANDDRUCCOLO THAT THE LIGHTS ILLUMINATING THE FACADE SIGNS HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND WILL REMAIN SO. IN THE EVENT THAT THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BECOMES AWARE THAT THE LIGHTS HAVE BEEN REPLACED THIS CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY SHALL BE NULL AND VOID. ~, -~ /~ Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 · Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: FROM: RE: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman The Shoppes at Mattituck N/E/c CR 48 and Cox's Neck Road, Mattituck SCTM~ 1000-121-2-1 DATE: October 1, 1991 As of September 30, 1991, the Planning Board finds that it cannot recommend the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the above-named site. As stated in my last memorandum to you of August 22nd, no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until all the light fixtures are removed from the backlit signs and the owner has submitted a notarized letter stating that such fixtures have been removed. cc: Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney Matthew Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: File on Shoppes at Mattituck N/E/c CR 48 & Cox's Neck Road, SCTM # 1000-121-2-1 Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner August 27, 1991 Today I returned Eugene DeNicola's telephone call from Friday regarding site plan violations at the above-noted site. Mr. DeNicola is the owner's attorney. Mr. DeNicola mentioned that he will speaking with the owner about the interior or backlit signs. He asked if his client could apply to the Planning Board for a waiver. I indicated that the Planning Board was not likely to grant the request because they have held to this requirement for everything that has been before them since the code was changed in 1989. He also mentioned that he wants to resolve the curb cut problem. Evidently a misunderstanding has arisen about the curb cut. He was under the impression that the Planning Board was requiring the widening of the curb cut. I told him that the Planning Board is supporting Vic Lessard's observation that the curb cut, which has been installed to the County's specifications, poses a traffic hazard. I recommended that he arrange a field meeting with Paul Campagnola, the permitting engineer at the County's Department of Public Works, and Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector. The purpose of the meeting would be to agree on a revision of the angle of the easternmost edge of the curb cut entrance so as to eliminate the traffic hazard. The Town has no jurisdiction over County requirements, but is concerned about the hazard that now exists. He agreed to pursue this course of action. CC: Planning Board Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Gary Fish, Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Jr., Chairman ~ Bennett Orlowski, Shoppes at Mattituck N/E/c C.R.48 and Cox's Neck Road, Mattituck SCTM # 1000-121-2-1 DATE: August 22, 1991 This site is being operated in a manner that violates the Zoning Code and the'spirit of the site plan. Specifically, the use of interior lit signs has been introduced to the building facade. Also, the use of the parking spaces to the rear has been compromised by the placing of a dumpster outside of the designated dumpster location. Given that the there has been a problem in the past with the interior lit signs, the Board requests that you obtain from the property owner a notarized statement to the effect that the lighting fixtures within the signs have been removed. Chief NOflMAN A. REILLY, JR. GEORGE LESSARD, JR. Second Ass(stant Chief MARTIN L. GRIFFIN, SR. 298-4914 MATTITUCK FIRE DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 136 Phone 298-8833 Wickham Avenue and Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 JOHN A. KEOGH 298-8024 RAYMOND F. NINE CARL E. $TELZER April 10, 1991 Building Department Town of Southold Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Fire Wells - Mattituck Fire district Gentlemen: Enclosed please find reports on new wells recently installed in various locations within the boundries of the Mattituck Fire District. If there is any additional information needed on these wells, or any other wells in this District, please contact the undersigned. a~D15%~3zK Fi!r~ Dist APR I 21991 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM: PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'FI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 7=~O~./~ March 21t 1991 The Shoppes at Mattituck SCTM# 1000-121-2-1 The Planning Board has made an inspection of the above referenced property. With the exception of the curb cut on Route 48, it is in conformance with the approved site plan of March 3, 1989. The Planning Board recormmends a certif$cate of occupancy be issued contingent on the curb cut being modified as discussed between your self and Paul Campagnola of the Suffolk County Department of Public Works. RAYMOND L. JACOBS SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS 765-3140 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JfIMES A. RICtlTER ENGINEERING INSPECTOR 734-5211 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM BENNETT ORLOWSICI, JR. CHAIRMAN JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A.~/ SHOPS @ MATTITUCK SCTM ~ 1000-121-2-1 FEBRUARY 22, 1991 Enclosed please find, as per your request, a copy of my inspection report for the above referenced property. If you have any questions or require any additional information Please call my office. FEB 2 5 1991 RAYMOND L. JACOBS SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS JAMES A. RICHTER ENGINEERING INSPECTOR 765-3140 734-5211 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD INSPECTION REPORT DATE FEBRUARY 15, 1991 PROJECT: SHOPS @ MATTITUCK DAY MON [T~lb~ WED THU ~R~ SAT SU~ COUNTY 48 & COX NECK RD. WEATHER SUN CJ.R__A~R) OVERCAST RAIN SNOW REPORT SCTM # : 1000-121-2-1 TEMP 0-32~50 10-70 70-8~ 85+ CONTRACTOR: WEND Sj~L~- HIGH PROJECT FOREMAN: HUMIDITY~RY~Y~I~D HIGH 01 AVERAGE FIELD FORCE: ~AME OF CONTRACTOR NON-MANUAL MANUAL REMARKS VISITORS: IlME'INAME IREPRESENTING REMUS I iEQUIPMENT AT THE SITE: CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: 3:00 pm Final inspection of Parking Lot and Drainage installation. Ail Catch Basins and manholes, as indicated on the Plans, have been installed Satisfactorily. Ail Curbing is installed and is in Satisfactory Condition. Ail Pavement has been placed. Wearing Surface is in Satisfactory Condition. All Striping and Painted Deliniation of Parking Areas and Traffic Lanes has been completed. The Easterly Property Line has some Construction Debris and miscelaneous Tubing pushed back into the adjacent ve§itation. This area should be cleaned up. PAGE1 OF 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 January 17, 1991 Augie Malandruccolo Middle Road Shopping Center Inc. P.O. Box 635 Sayville, New York 11782 RE: The Shoppes at Mattituck SCTM # 1000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. Malandruccolo: An inspection was made of the above named premises on January 3, 1991. The following items must be completed before the Planning Board can recommend that a Certificate Of Occupancy be issued by the Principal Building Inspector: 1. The fire well must be installed. The dumpster should be moved to its designated location as shown on the site plan. The screened fencing around the dumpster needs to be installed. The landscaping near the well and the septic system needs to be planted. Roof drains have to be connected to the drywells in the rear parking lot. The lights on poles shall be focused downward. They also shall be shielded and the wattage reduced so that there is no spillage of light off the property. The on-site directional signs shall be installed. The hole in the sidewalk adjacent to the westernmost end of the building, next to the vent for the septic system, should be covered with a plate. 8. The screen landscaping along the rear property line shall be planted. When planted, the Canadian Hemlocks should be staggered relative to the existing cedars on the adjacent lot. 9. The site needs to be cleared of rubbish. In addition to the above, the internally lighted facade around the front and sides of the building is not allowed. The Planning Board will not recommend that a Certificate Of Occupancy be issued by the Principal Building Inspector until the building is brought into conformance with the approved site plan. If you have any questions or require further assistance please contact this office. Very truly yours, nett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Gary Fish, Building Inspector Staff notes on Field Inspection: January 3, 1990 The Shoppes at Mattit'uck Northeast corner of CR 48 and Cox's Neck Road Inspection conducted by: R. Kassner and V. Scopaz The site is substantially complete with the exception of the following outstanding items: 1. Fire well has not been installed. The dumpster is not within its designated location. The screened fencing around the dumster has not been installed. Some landscaping is missing, near the well and near the septic system. Roof drains have not been connected to the dr!rwells in the rear parking lot. The electrical wiring is in place, but the light poles have not been installed. 6. The on-site directional signs are not in place. There is a hole in the sidewalk adjacent to the westernmost end of the building, next to the vent for the septic system, which should be covered with a plate. The lighting on the facade indicates that the signs will be interior lit signs. The approval did not include this type of sign. The screen landscaping along the rear property line has not been installed. The canadian hemlocks should be staggered with the existing cedars on the adjacent property. Other Observations: The identity of two circular structures located within the easternmost planting area adjacent to the building is not known. Also, the angle of the curb relative to the road on County Route 48 appears to pose a traffic safety hazard. Since the County Public Works Department specified how the curb was to be installed, we should ask them to inspect to see if the work was done in accordance with their specifications. The site needs to be cleared of rubbish. EUGENE l. DENICOLA January 3, 1991 Department of Planning & Development Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Prem: n/e corner Middle Road (CR 48) and Cox Neck Lane, Mattituck Building Permit No. 17266 Z Dear Sirs: I enclose herewith photostatic copy of correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environ- mental Conservation. As you will note, Item 1 requires a letter from the fire department stating that the fire well is required. It is my understanding that your department required the installation of the fire well and I would request that you forward a letter to the undersigned stating that the fire well is required in connection with the construction of the shopping center on the said premises/ Thank you for your sourly an~atlo~hereln. ! Enclosure NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE ~PLICATION - THIS IS NOT A PERMIT APPLICANlr: MIDDLE ROAD SHOPPING CTR INC PO BOX 635 SAYVILLE, NY 11782 ^PpLCA~n~ D 1-4738-00223/00001-0 PERMITS APPLIED FOR ARTICLE 15, TITLE 15: LONG ISLAND WELL FACILITY/PROJECT MIDDLE RD. SHOPPING CTR. PROPERTY PROJECT IS LOCATED IN SOUTHOLD ~N SUFFOLK COUNW 32767 BATCH NUMBER: 82115 Your ~plicalion 1~ Permit is Incomplele, the Following Items are Required: Add~onal Info~'malJon: 1. A LETTER FROM THE FiRE DEPT. STATING THAT THIS WELL IS REQUIRED MUST BE SUBMITTED. 2. 3 SETS OF PLANS ARE REQUIRED, YOU MUST SUBMIT 2 MORE SETS. NO FURTHER ACTION ~ BE TN(EN UNTIL ALL OF THESE I~TE~J-S N:IE RECEIVED CONTACT PERSON MARK C CARRARA SIGNATUF~: .,.~//~' ~/ ..... · NYS DE~T OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVAllON DIVISION OF REC-ULATONy AFF AIRS DATE 12/13/90 EUGENE L. DENICOLA January 3, 1991 Ma~tituck ~ire Department Pi~ Avenue Mattituck, New York 11952 Premises: n/e corner Middle Road (C.R. 48) and Cbx Neck Road, Mattituck, New York Building Permit No. 17266 Z Dear Sirs: Pl~se be advised the undersigned is in the process of obtaining approval for the installation of a fire well at t~ne above location from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. I. enclose herewith photostatic copy of letter from the New York State DEC requesting a letter from the fire department stating that the fire well is required. I ~uld appreciate your transmitting same to this office as expeditiously as possible. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation herein. Very truly yours, Eugene L. DeNicola ELD:eb Enclosure cc: Department of Planning & Development Town of Southold cc: Department of Fire Prevention Town of Southold NOTE: Permit No. 48-57 ~/~_.. PERMIT UNDER SECTION 136 of ARTICLE VI of HIGHWAY LAW WHEREAS, a certain highway known as the Middle Rd. CR No. 48 has been improved and is on the Suffolk County Road System and ' / · ' ' f ~ The Shoppes @ Sou~t'~old, c/o Augie Malandruccolo WHEREAS, 298 Half Hollow Road, Dix Hills, NY 11746 rec[uests permission to remove an existing driveway, build concrete curb, asphalt pavement, topsoil & seed as per plans, Typical Sections & County Specs. On the n/s/o Middle Road, CR 48, e/cor, of as per sketch or map attached. Cox Neck Road, Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold. NOW, THEREFORE, permission is hereby granted to said Sprinkler systems will not be permitted to do said work upon the following conditions: on County R.O.W. CONDITIONSAND RESTRICTIONS 1. When concrete is removed, cut concrete with concrete saw two feet outside the limits of the proposed excavation and for the full panel width. When the cut is made in pavement within 10 feet of the panel joint, the pavement shall be removed for full pa riel width from the cut on the fa r side of the excavation to the pa riel join t. 2.Sack and thoroughly compact fill using POWER TAMPER, placing soils so that various types of soil are in same relative position as before excavating. Grade to grig na surface. 3.Replace pavement, sidewalk or surface same as existing; If concrete, replace using 1:1 3/4:3 1/2 mix stone mix concrete; if bituminous material, replace using same type as removed. 4.If concrete curb is removed, replace with similar curb 1:1 3/4:3 1/2 mix. 5.Edge of Jacking Pits or any other excavation shall be not less than 5 feet from Edge of Pavement. NO undercutting allowed in Pit. 6.Notify the Department at Yaphank 924-3451 when the work is to begin so that an inspection can be made °f the operation. This permit shall not be assigned or transferred without the written consent of the Commissioner of Public Works, The work authorized by this permit shall be performed under the supervision and to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Public Works or his representative, Particular attention is called to the necessity of thoroughly compacting the back fill, which will be required by the Commissioner of Public Works. The Commissioner of Pubiic Works shall be given one week's notice by said applicant of the date when it intends to begin the work authorized by this permit, and prompt notice of its completion, The said applicant hereby agrees to hold the State, County and Town harmless on account of damages of any kind which may arise during the progress of the work authorized by this permit or by reason thereof, Applicant certifies all persons concerned with actual work under this permit are duly covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance and the State, County and Town shall be held harmless on account thereoL The Commissioner of Public Works reserves the right to at any ti me revoke or annul this permit should the said applicant fail to comply with the terms and conditions upon which it is granted, The applicant agrees to pay all necessary expenses incident to supervision and inspection by reason of the granting of such permit as certified by the Commissioner of Public Works, such payment to be made within ten days from the rendering of the certified account, Work under this permit to be commenced within thirty days from the date of permit and continued m an expeditious manner, The applicant shall submit a detailed plan of structure to be built, with a description of proposed method of construction it is understood that should future changes in the alignment or grade of the highway require changes in the work covered by this application and permit, the applicant shall on reasonable notice from the Commissioner of Public Works make such necessary changes at his own expense within the time so specified in notice Traffic shall be maintained by the applicant on this section of the highway while the work is in progress and until its final completion, :M~tl:~a~k~ in the sum of $ i 2,, 000 · 00 payabte to the County Treasurer of Suffolk County is A Bond ~x'~ ..................................... on file as security that the highway will be restored to its original condition where disturbed at the expense of the applicant, as soon as deposited the work has been completed, and the said Commissioner of Public Works is hereby authorized to expend all or as much of such deposit as may be necessary for that purpose, should the said applicant neglect or refuse to perform the work, ........................ I considerationo grantingthispermitthe i~.nedacceptsitsubiecttoconditi~nsdescribe_.~ ~'/ ~// ;/~/~//~p (~a n t ~/Commissioner ~pPubhc Works, Suffolk County TO AVOID SERIOUS DAMAGE TO VITAL UNDERGROUND FACILITIES, PLEASE CALL LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY AT JUNIPER 2-9000 OR FOR TELEPHONE FACILITIES CALL N.Y. TEL CO. FLORAL PARK 2-OFFICIAL25 BEFORE STARTING THE WORK AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT. cc: Town of Southold ~/ Form P-136 hi i~* : 42-107:1/83 EUGENE L. DENICOLA 2~ RAILROAD AVENUE April 2, 1990 Mattituck Fire Department Pike Avenue Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Premises n/e/c Middle Road (C.R. and Cox Neck Lane, Mattituck Building Permit No. 17266Z 48) Dear Sirs: Please be advised the undersigned represents the owner and developer of the shopping center being constructed at the above location. A condition of the issuance of the building permit requires a fire well to be installed at the corner of the premises, designated on the copy of the survey enclosed. Kindly advise this office upon receipt hereof as to the required specifications for the installation of such fire well, and further, advise as to whether a separate electric system is required to be connected to the said fire well. My client is presently arranging for the installation of same, however, in an effort to avoid any difficulties in construction of same, your advices would be sincerely appreciated as to the aforementioned specifications. Very truly yours, Eugene L. DeNicola ELD:ro cc: Department of Planning & Development Town of Southold Department of Fire Prevention Town of Southold /V2J'° / // / ~//,' ~a / ~k/ /~f , ~ ~ /' %he Jollying: Cha~gi~ the ~ ' J/ ;~ ;~ / Well on the map These re~q ~-~. ,d~:-~ ./ RAYMOND L. JACOBS Superintendent Highway Department Town of Southold Peconic Lane Peconic, N.Y. 11958 Tel. 765-3140 734-5211 October 24, 1989 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Shoppes at Southold Bear Mr. Orlowski: I have reviewed the plan at the area of Cox Neck Road and find it to be satisfactory. Respectfully, sR~em°r~dnteL~e~°bo~ Highways Sidney B. Sowne, P.E.. L.S. (1922-1959) Chester C. Kelsey, P.E.. L.S. Robert A. Stanton, P.E. Robert W. Brown, L.S. Frank J. Antetomaso, P.E. George A. Style, P.E. Jerry D. Alrnont, P.E. George L. Fagan, Jr., Ph.D., P.E Frank Capobianco, C,E. Paul F. Stevens, P.E Roger L. Cocchi, P.E. Thomas R. Pynchon, LS SIDNL 7 B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 (516) 724-0611 August 3, 1989 Roland Anders Francis J. Lynch PhiJlip Schlotzhauer Joseph F. Stegman William T. Styne Richard B. Weber Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: The Shoppes at Mattituck (SBB No. (SBB No. 87272) Dear Sir: We have reviewed the drainage for the most recent submission on the above referenced project and find it to be acceptable. We also enclose a Bond Estimate for the public improvements indicated on Cox Neck Road and Main Road. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS VINCEN MARICONDA VM:rp MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER An Equal Oppodunity Employer M/F/H SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON August 3, 1989 BOND ESTIMATE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT THE SHOPPES AT MAI'TICUCK SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK ITEM 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. DESCRIPTION PRICE Unclassified Excavation 20 c.y. $ 10.00 Saw Cut 300 1.f. 3.00 Fine Grading 100 s.y. 3.00 Concrete Curb 280 1.f. 10.00 Asphalt Base Course - 4" Thick 16 Tons 100.00 Aspahlt Binder Course 1-1/2" Thick 8 Tons 100.00 Asphalt Wearing Coure 1-1/2" Thick 8 Tons 100.00 Maintenance & Protection of Traffic Job QUANTITY AMOUNT $ 200.00 900.00 300.00 2,800.0O 1,600.00 800.00 800.00 L.S. 1,000.00 SUB - TOTAL = $8,400.00 8% INSPECTION FEE = 672.00 TOTAL = $9,072.00 SBB NO. 87272 V.M. D/121 Sheet 1 of i Tmvn Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (5115) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 19, 1989 Anthony W. Lewandowski P.O. Box 448 Southold, NY 11971 RE: The Shoppes at Mattituck SCTM #1000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. Lewandowski: As discussed at the May 15, 1989 Planning Board meeting a plan showing the turning radius and parking layout for the above mentioned approved site plan will be submitted to the Planning Board for review. As noted at the meeting, the Planning Board is not in favor of making the change from the approved plan dated November 22, 1988. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. - Very truly yours, CHAIRMAN CC: Scott Acorde, Miller Assoc. jt Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 4, 1989 Anthony W. Lewandowski P.O. Box 448 Southold, N.Y. 11971 RE: The Shoppes at Mattituck SCTM%1000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. Lewandowski: The Planning Board reviewed your letter of May, 2, 1989 in regard to meeting with the Planning Board. You have been scheduled to meet at the next public Planning Board meeting on May 15, 1989. Please contact the office if you are unable to attend. cc: Scott Accardo ms P.O. Box 448 Southold, NY 2 May 1989 11971 Chester Orlowski Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, Soutnold, NY 1197] Dear Sir: I would appreciate the opportunity, at your earliest convenience, to speak to you and/or members of the Southold Planning Board in regard to the misplacement of the foundation for a shopping center on the northeast corner of Middle Road and Cox Neck Road in Mattituck, NY. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Land Surveyor AWL/mj ~~ ARCi4!~-E:STS ~. ~!TERtC) RS April 27, 1989 Southold Towu P Box 1179 Main Road Southo] d NY Planning Board ~-, Or-lowski I am writing to S~lopping Center In:; firm designed M[ddte Road in Matt[tuck. make 3ou aware of' a problem that arose ~ith the the Corne~ of (lox Neck & The surve3o[' ~4ho staked ouL the founda~ fon was old plan x, hich had Jif fetCh1 dimentions than the plan. The outcome has been Lhat the fc>undation to the tot ] ]ne which ia behind the building, working from an final appro~ ed is I 1 ' -0' Nolle of the! minimum yard scl,backs have been (2ncroa(;hed ilpoll, IIowever, thi~ parking scheme will have to be ad,~usted, i have ¢~rlc]ogeq~ a cop3 Of th~:- puoposed re', l. sion For >our review. No further ~cork will be (tOllfe uniil we reoeive your comments & S/l~gestiOflS- [~ poss[ble~ [)]ease pevJew Lhe enclosed plan as ~oon aa possible, as [ime i's of' thc esserioe. Thank )uu. >Ir. J DeNico La SA. Jd 931 HALLOCKAVENUE, PORT JEFFERSON STATION, NEW YORK 11776 516-33%8555 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 1, 1989 Scott Accardo Miller Associates 931 Hallock Avenue Port Jefferson Station, New York 11776 RE: The Shoppes at Mattituck $CTM~1000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. Accardo: The Planning Board reviewed your letter dated April 27, 1989 in reference to the location of the foundation. The Planning Board is not in favor of the r~vision to the site plan and requests that the building be buil~ as per the previously approved site plan. This site plan received conditional final approval on April 11, 1989, and was endorsed by the Chairman on March 13, 1989. BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. CHAIRMAN cc: Building Department ms Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 IELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Robert Brown Sidney Bowne & Son 45 Manor Road Smithtown, NY 11787 Dear Mr. Brown: Pursuant to your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following: Ap_~plication of (Major subdivision, minor subdivision, ~te pl~' bbXTERIAL SUBMITTED: File # Sketch plan Preliminary map Street Profiles Grading Plan Preliminary site plan Final Ymp Suffolk County Tax Map No. Other . G,f / c,~ m~Z~RIR~WS K I, ~R.-f, CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOA-RD February 23, 1989 Southold Town Planning Board Po Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Mr. B. Orlowski Jr., Enclosed please find four copies of the Shoppes at "Mattituck". I have given you four copies each of the site plan at 1"-30' and 1"-20' The fire wells have been located as per your request. I have not submitted mylar copies of the plans because Jill of your department, checked with someone and they said it was only required on new applications. If you would send me the final site plan approval as soon as possible, I would really appreciate itt As time is an issue. Sincerely, ~cott Acc~ardo Associate/Designer ce: J. Shavolian SA:dd 931 HALLOCKAVENUE, PORT JEFFERSON STATION, NEW YORK 11775 5t6-331--8555 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 11/10/88 Scott Accardo Miller Associates 931 Hallocki Avenue Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 RE: Firewell locations SCTM 91000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. Accardo: Enclosed please find a copy of the fire well location as requested by the Mattituck Board of Fire Commissioners. Please include this on your final mylar map. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN enc. MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND. N, ¥. 11952 Phone 298-8833 October 31, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, N.T. 11971 Dear Sir: The Roard of Fire Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District submit the Fire Well locations on the followinE subdivisions as requested. ~HE ~MOPPES AT MATTITUCK - 8CTM# 1000-121-2-1 Well to be loceted at the Northwest corner of the property FARMVEU ASSOC. - SCTM# 1000-121-3-2 3 Wells to be located at I - Lot ~21 2 - North~east corner of Pondiug area B 3 - South west corner of Ponding Area A ELIJAHS LANE ESTATES SECTION 3 - SCTM# lO00-108-04-P/O 7.1 ~ll to be located at the North end of Property Line between Lots #h and #5. Any further information will be ~ladly furnished upon request. are sorry at the delay. Cordially, Encl: Mattituck ?ire District .~ell Specs. ohn A. ~sttituck S~e t. Dist. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOT1' L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 April 6, 1990 Eugene L. De Nicola 24 Railroad Avenue P.O. Box 68 Sayville, NY 11782 RE: Shoppes at Mattituck SCTM~ 1000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. De Nicola: The Planning Board has reviewed your letter of April 2, 1990 requesting specifications for firewells. Enclosed is the requested firewell specifications for the Mattituck Fire District. If you have any questions or require further assistance please contact this office. Encl. cc: Mattituck Fire District Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman EUGENE L. DENICOLA 24~ RAILROAEI AVENUE April 2, 1990 Mattituck Fire Department Pike Avenue Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Premises - n/e/c Middle Road (C.R. 48) and Cox Neck Lane, Mattituck Building Permit No. 17266Z Dear Sirs: Please be advised the undersigned represents the owner and developer of the shopping center being constructed at the above location. A condition of the issuance of the building permit requires a fire well to be installed at the corner of the premises, designated on the copy of the survey enclosed. Kindly advise this office upon receipt hereof as to the required specifications for the installation of such fire well, and further, advise as to whether a separate electric system is required to be connected to the said fire well. My client is presently arranging for the installation of same, however, in an effort to avoid any difficulties in construction of same, your advices would be sincerely appreciated as to the aforementioned specifications. Very truly yours, Eugene L. DeNicola ELD:to CC: Department of Planning & Development Town of Southold Department of Fire Prevention Town of Southold Lol- MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT MATTITUCK. LONG ISLAND, N. ¥. 11952 Phone 298-8853 Fire Well Specifications for the Mattituck Fire District: Shallow Wel~: Gravel Filter Type by developing the natural formation surrounding the well screen - The casing shall be 8" inside diameter - full weight wrought steel drive pipe - the well screen shall be stainless steel and shall have an open slot length of not less than 20 feet. Upon completion of setting of screen this well is to be developed until uo further sand enters the screen and until gravel-filter wall surrouudlng the screen is stabilized at the ultimate pumping capacity of the well. Well is required to pump 300 GPM for one hour and 200 GPM thereafter. Top of well to have a 5" Cast Iron Fire Hydrant Adaptor Cap with Connecting Chain. Submersible Fire ~ell: Well casing and screen will be same as above. Well to be equipped with a 2 stage l0 H. P. 3 Phase, 3500 RPM electric motor with electric starter, Typer NEMA ~m capable of delivering 385 GPM At l0 PSI discharge at center of the tee at the top of the well - This pump shall be of the submersible turbine type~ equipped with grease-packed bearings in bowl assemblies. The bowl shall be of a smooth finish design to ~uide the water from one stage to the next with mtnimun turbulence. Top of well is to be finished off with a ~" check valve with a ~ x 5 increaser and a 5" fire hydrant adaptor cap with connecting chain. The hose threads and hydrant wrench nut shall conform to the standards of the Sattituck Fire District. The drop pipe is to be 4" black standard weight - the submersible pump wire is to be #8 rubber covered. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HAL. PIN SUFFOL,K COUNTY EXECUTIVE July 27, 1988 Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: C.R. 48, "The Shoppes at Southold", n/w/c of Cox's Neck Road Dear Ms. Scopaz: Enclosed please find a copy of a letter that was forwarded to you in March of this year with regards to the above referenced project. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours, C. ROGER MEEKER CHIEF ENGINEER Campagnol~ -~~ Junior Civil Engineer CRM/MPC/j fb Enc. cc: Robert Brown, Sidney Bowne DEPARTMENT OF PUBU¢ WORKS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY ExECUTiVE March 22, 1988 A. BARTON CASS, P.E. Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: ~ Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: C.R. 48, "The Shoppes at Southold", n/w/c of Cox's Neck Road Dear Ms. Scopaz: This Department's Traffic Division has reviewed the "Traffic Evaluation" Study by George Michos submitted to us by your office on March 9, 1988. We feel that the conclusions presented by Mr. Michos in his report has accurately described the impact of this development on the adjacent road system. This Department is prepared to issue a permit for ingress only as well as curbing and paving (on County Road 48). It would be beneficial to the Town to also require the developer to install similar roadway improvements along the frontage of the Town road, Cox's Neck Road. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours, C. ROGER MEEKER CHIEF ENGINEER By: ' Junior Civil ~nglneer CRM/MPC/jfb Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July 21, 1988 Mattituck Fire Department Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: T~e Shoppes at Mattituck SCTM# 1000-121-2-1 Dear Sirs: Enclosed please find the map for the above mentioned site plan. Please review to see if any firewells are needed. Your prompt review would be appreciated as this application is in the final stages. ,"'very_~rn~ly yours, jd 1988 Scott Accardo Miller Associates 931 Hallocki Avenue Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 RE: Shoppes at Southold SCTM #1000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. Accardo: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 11, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve this site plan subject to changing the name. This parcel is located on Cox Neck, Mattituck. Please note that two issues remain unresolved: one is whether a fire well. is required on the premises. The other is whether any improvements will be necessary on cox's Neck Road after the work has been completed on the County Road. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. ~uly y~urs, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.,.?~ CHAIMAN jt TO ,D S Southold, N,Y. 11971 (516) 765-19~8 Scott Accardo Miller Associates 931 Hallock Avenue Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 Re: Shoppes at Southold SCTM #1000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. Accardo: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 20, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board send this site plan to the Building Department for certification. This site plan is located on Cox Neck Road at Mattituck. (Note that this site plan is not to scale). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, jt Sidney B. Bowne, P.E., L.S. (1922-1959) Chester C Kelsey, P.E., LS. Alexandre W. Uercil, PE. Robert A. Stanton, P.E. Robert W, Brown, L.S. Zabdiel A, Blackman, P E, L.S. George A. Style, PE Jer~y {3 Almont, PE George L. Fagan, Jr, Ph.D,, PE. Thomas R. Pynchon, L.S SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 (516) 724-0611 RECEIVED BY' SOUTHi]LD lO¥~'tl PLAHI!I~G_~AR~ / JUN g 0 198 V' DATE June 16, 1988 Roland Anders Frank Capobianco Roger L Cocchi Francis J Lynch Philip Schiotzhauer Joseph F Stegman Paul F Stevens William T Styne Richard B Weber Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr; Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Shoppes at Southold Cox Neck Road, Mattituck. Dear Sir: The review of the above site concurs with the overall findings of the traffic report. The yield signs controlling the intersection of County Road 48 and Cox Neck Road have no effect on capacity and level of service (LOS) calculations. However, their presence influences the operation of the intersection. The proposed Shoppes at Southold will have minor traffic impacts on Cox Neck Road. These traffic impacts are addressed via the driveway design. Specific comments are not offered regarding the traffic impacts, of this proposal, to Middle Road and County Road 48 since the roadway is under the jurisdiction of the County of Suffolk. From a traffic engineering perspective, the proposed Southold will not have deleterious traffic impacts to the roadways. Shoppes at surrounding Very truly yours, SIDNEY ~4'l~I~E & SON _ ROBERT W. BROWN~-L.S. RWB:rp cc: Ray Dean Ray Jacobs. Suot,/Hwys MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER An Equal Ol)portunity Employe~ M/F/H ARCHITECTS Town Oi' Southold Plannina Department Po Box ~ i79 5outhokd, ~Y 11.~371 conxersation xit, h Xr. :~ard. The ,-onm'v't~: bumpe:~, imve roof oxe:rhan~ around t, hf building en<-1oses the sideuakk and Wa~d and is reflected in the encLoaed sil~ layout, f/heeking these d[melis~otls ::i t I C<,hl'i :n~ that btlt ~,]ilig 4h~J '331 HALLOCK AVENUE, PORT JEFFERSON STATION, NEW YORK 11776 (516) 331-8555 ,ax' 18, 1.<t88 Planning Board Town of Southold Southo]d, NY 11971 Dear Sirs; Enclosed are the revisions 1988. The revisions are as [) the pJanning board imd made on May 9, follows: The drawing was enlarged to 1" = 20' ]'he entire sheet could not, be accommodated on one sheet. The remainder of' the site information oan be found on sheet SI. The proposed first floor elevation is noted on the building foot print (sheet S1) while the building heights and elevations are denoted on the' construction documents. (note: building height at top of ridge = 31 The landscaping along the north propert) line has been revised to a Canadian Hemlock evergreen hedge. The curb at, the rear of' the building was placed 4' [rom the building. Plantings and concrete pads were instal.led ~.ithin this area. 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) I. ig[ting drawings were provided along with the site plan. The light poles are 1Z' in height. Location, direction, power anti time of use are all noted on the site plan. Street trees are 30'-to i0 O.C. as shown on site p ] an. The sidewalk along C.R. 48 and Cox Neck road was deleted. The locations, names, and existing x<idths of adjacent streets and curbllnes are shown on the :~ite plait, 3S is the end of pavement relative to proper't> lines. sting and proposed 2' contours were plox id~d. There are no existing sewers or there any underground utilities the property, within and aija{ t i to Town of' Southold Southold, NY 11971 12) 13) 14} 15} 16) 17) The front aisle between the building and ~,be islands remain at 24' to provide for two-way vehicle access. £andscaped The dumpster has been moved to the north*~asl corner of the building and has been enclosed with a sc. reened fence around ils perimeter. The landscaping islands in the parking Jot have been increased to 6' in width as requested. Existing trees are noted wherever they cart be saved on the site. Plantin.~s along side building cannot be accoinmodated diie to roof overhang which wraps around building s~des. The material at the rear' elevat:ion has been changed to cedar' clapboard as suggested. Note: Revised construct:Ion documents have been enclosed for ~-our review) 18) See }Ir. Lassard regarding loading zone r-equirmnent. Hopeful]y, the enclosed package will satisfx the Boacd's requirements and the final review will l)t'oc'eed s.~iftly and uncomplicated. Thank you very much for your patienoe arid eooper'ation. Sincerely, Pro,ject Manager cc: S. Accardo SPE IFICATION LANTERN -- LCK2 (as shown) HOUSING One piece unitized, durable, corrosion resistant cast aluminum construction. FITTER Cast aluminum fitter designed to coordinate with po~e, luminaire and lamp style selected. DIFFUSER Panels constructed of high impact plastic Specify -- Clear - C/ White - WT Amber Tint - AT OPTIONS: For controlled light distribution (Types Ill and V) specify refractor (IR) and desired distribution. Example (IR-V) BALLAST Specify lamp and voltage required from LurnlArm Section pages LIA %7. LAMPS By others For additional lumlnalres see LumlArm Section pages LIA 1-7 5" DIA. All aluminum construction. XZ2 XM2 (as shown) XS2 XD2 For additional arms see LumlArm Section pages LIA 842 CONFIGURATION CHART 7900 Clybourn Ave., Sun Valley, CA 91352 · 818-767-3031 W A L M O U N T fPI60-70HP~85' AWPt60 ADJUSTABLE WALLPACK MV LI~ FL INC · APPLICATIONS: · S.:.r~ Lighting · Building perimeters · Panking Areas · .on- · Undenm~se~ · Tut~nel$ For om~ertng Inforrnoflor~, see p(~;3e ~07 Southold, N,Y. 1197! (516) 765-1938 May 31, 1988 Rick Wertheim Miller Associates 931 Hallock Avenue Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 RE: The Shoppes at Southold SCTM# 1000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. Wertheim; Enclosed please find a marked copy of your recent submission for the above mentioned site plan. It seems that there is a discrepancy between the actual size of the building and the numbers written on the map. The Board also had some comments in reference to your letter. In answer to Number 10, regarding underground utilities, utility connections to stores should be underground (electric, telephone, cable). In answer to Number 16, it is not true that plantings along side building cannot be accommodated due to roof overhang which wraps around building sides. Upon compliance with all of the Board's comments, review of this site plan will continue. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. /'~ery truly 2fO~rs/~ /~ /~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ~ CHAIRMAN ~ & 8'--o" ~, ?.-7~, + 7.~.o ~.F/v.L..F. = 10.% V.~-.F .'. USE 17,,Ov.t-.F. ~ (.~.) 8'0 l-.p. ,t ,.-~. ,,,,,,,, LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE ~'.-: 1)~'1'..'-  5 ~N~E~I A~PU~ P~ ~F 4APA~ ~RY Z'-Z~(~~ ' i R STANDARD CONC. CURB ~ STREET REPAIR ' ~ ~'~""~ ~,.. J~,,o'~.~ ~.~ ~=~ ~ ..~ ~,,...l~.~,] ~ SMITHTOWN (516)724-7l 9l_'_ P2R-~ JE__Ff~E~ ~TA (5' 6) 331. / KEY MAP ~ ~ " ~ H ""t" Ii i ' iproj.~ 8150 ~2 ,qOAMSO TBCr 4.4.6 AKA,- 51T~ L-~6'HTiNO To ~H 1151.-p.~ p /RI)AM 5o6/ S&'/0"£ 44.8 8,mt t~t~ovt, p HP-DIAN COHC. May 18, 1988 Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, NY 11971 Dear Sirs; Enclosed are the revisions the planning board had made on May 9, 1988. The revisions are as follows: 1)¸ The drawing was enlarged to 1' = 20'. The entire sheet could not be accommodated on one sheet. The remainder of the site information can be found on sheet S1. 2) The proposed first floor elevation is noted on the building foot print (sheet SI) while the building heights and elevations are denoted on the construction documents. (note: building height at top of ridge = 24'-0") 3) The landscaping along the north property line [las been revised to a Canadian Hemlock evergreen [ledge. 4) The curb at the rear of the building was placed 4' from the building. Plantings and concrete pads were installed within this area. 5) Lighting drawings were provided along with the site plan. The light poles are 12' in height. direction, power and time of use are all noted site plan. revised Location, on the 6) Street trees are 30'-to 40' C.C. as shown 'on site plan. 7) The sidewalk along C.R. 48 and Cox Neck ~oad was deleted. 8) The locations, names, and existing~%idths of adjacent. streets and curblines are shown on the site plan, as ix the end of pavement relative to property ]ines. 9) 10) Existing and proposed 2' contours were provided. There are no existing sewers or waterlines, nor are--""~~ ~%j 19[ there any underground utilities within and adjaceat to the property. page 2 Town of Southold Southold, NY 11971 12) 13) 14) 151 16) The front aisle between the building and tbe landscaped islands remain at 24' to provide for two-way emergency vehicle access. The dumpster has been moved to the northeast corner of the building and has been enclosed with a screened fence around its perimeter. The landscaping islands in the parking lot have been increased to 6' in width as requested. Existing trees are noted wherever they can be saved on the site. Plantings along side building cannot be accommod~ed roof overhang which wraps arouad building The material at the rear elevation has been changed to cedar clapboard as suggested. Note: I~evised construct].on documents have been enclosed for your review) 18) See Mr. Lassard regarding loading zone requirement. Hopefully, the enclosed package will satisfy the Board's requirements and the final review will proceed swiftly and uncompl i ca ted. .~_ Thank you very much for your patience and cooperation. Sincerely, Project ~lanag e r 2 0 cc: S, Accardo SPEClFICATIOI DIA. LANTERN -- LCK2 (as shown) HOUSING One piece unitized, durable, corrosion resistant cast aluminum construction. FITTER Cast aluminum fitter designed to coordinate with pole, luminaim and lamp style selected. DIFFUSER Panels constructed of high impact plastic Specify -- Clear - CL White - WT Amber Tint - AT OPTIONS: For controlled light distribution (Types Ill and V) specify refractor (IR) and desired distribution. Example (IR-V) BALLAST Specify lamp and voltage required from LumlArm Section pages LIA 1-7. LAMPS By others For additional lumlnalree see I..umlArm Section pages UA 1.7 All aluminum construction. XZ2 XM2 (as shown) XXl XS2 XD2 For additional arms see LumlArm Section pages L/A 8-12 CONFIGURATION CHART 7900 Clybourn Ave., Sun Valley, CA 91352 · 818-767-303[ ~' W A L L 0 U N T As~E60~U~AB L E WALLPACK HP$ /' MH '~MV LP~ AWIN60 ~ FL INC · AI~LICA~ON$: · Set.fy Lighting · Building Perimeters · Parking Are~ · Ramp~ · Tur~gs Paridn8' Dimen.ion~ RECOMMENDE:D SAJM(.~ OF STALL WIDTHS WIDTH (h) 8 11 12 PARKIN__~G DIMI='N$1ON$ IN FEET AND INCHES 41'.e" · 57'-Z' 48'-0" M'-O" M'.O" 48'-0" ~6'.11" STABDABg' T D ~ou~old. N.Y. x a- STTS P~ Required documentsl 1. Six surveys with all site pl,n elements, see attached list 2. Filing fee of $100 .'* " 3. Long ~.nvironmental Assessment, Part I see attached Procedure: . - ]; 1. The above items are subn~tted to the Plan~lng Board The application is placed on the agenda for the Board's review. Field inspection'mede' Inspection report at ne~t meeting 5. Recommendations on revisions or Board can forward site plan to the Building Department for CertificatiOn 6. If certified, the Planning Board cal~ take £1nal action on the site plan 7. If approved, the Chairman endorses the surveys when an~ conditions have been met. T LD .. ~J~d, N.Y. 11971 Required documents ~ 1. ® S:Lx surveys wlth &il o:Lco p~m &iema-,te ac a ec&l.$ .of 1" - 200, see acCached lteC. Lom~ Env=LronmenC&i .eeamnt, Parc I see aCC~ch~d Procedure~ '-" 1. The above ~tm are aubalcced co Cha Plann~na Board 2'.' The applicaC'~on :Lo placed on the agenda Jar the 'aoard*8 gev:Le~, 3. Field 2.nspect~n mde" ~. InspecC:Lou ,'apoEt aC next matins ' 5. Recon~endaC'fonst o~1 rev:Lg:f.one or Board cin £oward elco pi-mi Co .che. au~.ldins Depa~tnsnc for Certt~Lcacion 6. II cerct£1ed,'the pls~ntng Board Can take final act/on on.the s/Ce plan 7. If approved, the Clmtrmn endogaee the surveys vhan ~ condlclon~ have been maC. *******NOTE, ALL SITE PLAN EI,EI4KNTS AS PER THE ATTACH~ CHECKLIST ARE TO BE ON A SURVEY AND STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR, ENGINEER OR ARCHXTECT. 8ourbokl, NoY, 11971 October 13, 1987 Scott Accardo, Project Manager Miller Associates 931 Hallock Avenue Port Jefferson Station, MY 11776 Sketch of proposed retail '.stores N/E/c of County Road 48 and Cox Neck Road, Mattituck Dear Mr. Accardos '... In response to your letter to Victor Lessard of the BUilding Department, the enclosed sketch was also reviewed by this office. On the sketch the yards are,~as marked. The sade yard in this instance is on the east side of the building. It is recommended that you move the building toward the back of the lot away from the road. I trust this answers your questions as posed in your September 17th .letter. Sincerely, Valerie Scopaz Town Planner cc: Victor Leseard 8omMM. N.Y. D,¢~mhar 8, X987 Mr. Scott Acardo Hiller Associates 931Hallock Avenus Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 RE: The Shoppes at $outhold Dear Hr. Acardo: The Plannin$'Roard has reviewed Cha &boys mnCioned pzopoea~?h~¢h your recently subn~ttCsd. A traffic impact study for tho proposal indic&tins the impact the commercial devolopnmnt will hays on Cox Neck Rood ami County Route 48. 2. A Justification of tho proposed park. inS. Elevation drav~nSs for ~ho b~lldins8. Upon receipt of tho above, tho Plaunin8 Board will procasd with ica If you have any questions, please don't hemitaCe Co contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. SOUT~OLD TO~ PLANNING BOARD PZ N.Y. 11071 January 29, 1988 Hr. Scott Accardo Hiller Associates 931 tiallockAvenue RE: The Shoppe8 at Southold ~, Dear Hr.'Accardo~ This letter is to reconfimHeliasa Spiro's phone conversation with Rick Wertheim on January 13, 1988 as to the Justifioatio~'~f the proposed parking. It is necessary that the revised plan show and explain the use of the "no~-rstail" area. to aid in the calculation of necessary parkin$ spaces. This can be bo~t accomplished by incledins a floor plan v/th tho slav&tieR driFlnSo, If you have any questione, please dontt hesitate to contact our office. Valeria Scopaz /anning Board Page 13 May 9, ~r. Orlowski: Next we have the Shoppes at Southold- Board to J~cu:s this application with the applicant. The Shoppes at Southold is lo~ated in Mattituck in case anybody doesn't know. Mr. A~cardo: Do you gentlemen have a copy of the letter dated April 18, 1{887 Mr. A~:cardo: This have been going on for a long time .... a lot of frustration. Another plan used the Shopping Center right off the road and I had no problem going with all your requirements. On this one, I un~e~;tand that Ms. Scopaz is starting her review through the mid point. That is when I received the change that would be added to the project after we began the project. What turn out to be an original, relat_vely simple, small plan has become quite complex. I understand the r~quirements of the traffic study and your ambition to make the Town ii better place. However, there is a lot of things that we just can't do on the site plan. I would like to talk to you about them now. ~ have addressed each of them in the letter. Let me go down the list ~nd make it simple. The first request is to make the eight foot buffer in the back and add a four foot sidewalk. If I do that, the minim~ requirement with parking is thirty five foot eleven inches. I have ~:hirty six feet there. If I add another seven feet, virtually eliminates that entire row of parking, which is sixteen spaces that would be eliminated. I understand the desire to have a four foot curb there, but it is a very tight spot, a very tight lot. It is a odd shape. There is really no way that I can accommodate that request. That ~ould be the first major problem we need to resolve. What is the Board's comments on that? Mr. W~rd: Just one question. With diagonal parking how do you propose to pu~ planting in a five foot strip? Mr. Accardo: The planting is in front of the diagonal parking. The plantkng is not incumbent upon the parking. Mr. W~rd: You are showing curb lawn. You are going to show a overhang of a ~ar. Mr. A~cardo: No. On diagonal parking there is a concrete bumper that is not shown on the plan. That prevents that. Mr. Ward: You got a concrete bu/r~er as well as a curb. Mr. Accardo: We will have a concrete bumper at a perpendicular angle to the space. Mr. Ward: That doesn't show that? Mr. Accardo: No that is not on here. But that is the way it is designed. Diagonal parking has that concrete bumper and the cars will not impose on that. 1988 Planning Board Page 14 May 9, 1988 Mr. Ward: In addition to the curb lawn. Mr. Accardo: Yes. It stick out in the space. You have seen it in shopping centers, I'm sure. Mr. Ward: That will keep you off your five foot planter. Mr. Accardo: That will keep us off the five foot. It was noted that the increase was asked for to screen the property next door. We don't have a problem with putting whatever kind of plantings you would suggest in that buffer area. I don't think the width is going to make the difference. I think it is the type of plant. You suggested we use the pine. That is fine. We can do that, but why couldn't that be acco~odated within that five feet. I don't think that the additional three feet is going to help the screening. It is the type of planting that goes in there. We are willing to do it with any type of plant you require for the screening. Imposing that four foot curb and the eight foot would virtually eliminate that back parking. Mr. Ward: You mention another one. What was that? The four foot? Mr. Accardo: The four foot sidewalk. Item number two. A curb should be placed along the rear of the building. At least four feet from the building to protect service users from the back doors in being hit by a car. I understand that but I really can't accommodate that. Mr. Ward: You have to do that one. Mr. Accardo: I have to do that one? Maybe I can move the front of the building up a little. The next one, another major issue. We would like to reduce the twenty four foot road. The drive way in front of the building that is right now being shown as a non- parking area to twenty feet. Twenty feet would make that a one way road. Anything less than twenty four feet is not acceptable as a two way road. And that would virtually cut off access to the entire lot from one entrance. You said that it is to stop people from wanting to park in front of the building. What we can do is put in ~right yellow strips the way it is always done in front of a shopping center. No parking fire zone. I can't reduce that. It would be a traffic hazard. Somebody coming out of the parking spaces trying make a left or a right and another car passing by in front of the shopping center there is no turning radius. I can't do that one. That is not acceptable. Mr. Ward: I don't know whether that is hard and fast. We will look at that one as our recommendation rather than hard and fast, alright? Mr. Accardo: O.K. The three foot tree island. That is a typical dimension for a tree island in many shopping centers. Requiring it to go to six is another one that is going to cause a reduction in parking. Mr. Ward: Is this another case where you are using bumpers as well as curbs? Are you using car stops? Planning Board Page 15 May 9, 1988 Mr. Accardo: No. Mr. Ward: We are going to have bumpers meeting. Correct? That is where are comments are coming from. Mr. Accardo: The comment was made that it won't sustain any tree life. So that is what I was... Mr. Ward: The bumpers meet, it won't sustain tree life. That is true. Or anything else that is in there. Mr. Accardo: Alright. I want to work with you and get this site through. I am not trying to be obstinate. Mr. Ward: So are we. Mr. Orlowski: That is why you are here. Mr. Accardo: There seems to be a failure of communication between both parties here, where things that should have been asked for, things that should have been asked for a long time ago would have made the project go a lot more smoothly. That is why I would like to get this settled tonight. O.K. we can try to increase that. Does it have to be six or can it be five feet. I can push the parking out on the ends into the planting area. Mr. Ward: You take a look on what your proposed planting is and if it is trees. You potentially have a two to two and half foot overhang on cars depending on what kind of car it is from your curb stop. You are kind of limited as to what you can put in a narrow planted area. Mr. Accardo: You want the sidewalk along County Road 48 to be deleted. Is there a reason. The last shopping center it was a requirement now you would like it deleted. I don't have a problem in deleting it, I just was curious. Mr. Ward: Where was it required? Mr. Accardo: Well, the shopping center right up the road. There was no negative comment. Let's say that. There was no negative comment in putting the sidewalk along the street. Mr. Ward: I don't know where we did it. Mr. Accardo: Right up the road. I forget the name of the street. The shopping center is right beyond the retirement village. Mr. Ward: There is a sidewalk there? Ms. Scopaz: The one across from the Bagel place. Ms. Spiro: Southold Square. Planning Board Page 16 May 9, 1988 Mr. Accardo: It was an issue in whether the County was going to maintain it or whether the Town was going to maintain the sidewalk. Mr. Lessard: Yes, he is right. Ms. Scopaz: I think the discussion was that the Town did not want the sidewalk. If you wanted to maintain the sidewalk you were entitled to put one in. I don't recall if there was any other debate there. You have to keep in mind that the shopping center up the block was very close to down town business district. The shopping center that you are proposing in Mattituck, no one lives near there. No one is going to walk there from one vacant lot to the shopping center. That happens also to be a rather dangerous curve. I highly doubt that people are going to cross the four lanes at that point to walk to the shopping center. They would drive there. So there is really no point in having a sidewalk. Mr. Accardo: O.K. We will delete it. Why do you request a sidewalk in front the parking strips. I am not sure whether you do or not. We have one place where it looks like it is crossed out. Over here and over here you have put it back in. I don't what good a sidewalk right here would do if there is no sidewalk here. Mr. Ward: On the ends of the parking lot. Mr. Accardo: Yes. Mr. Ward: No. We are taking it off the street. I don't see there is a problem. Ms. Scopaz: You want these here, so everybody that is parking in the back can walk up to the front. Mr. Accardo: There is one problem. I understand that you wanted away from the building so that we can put plantings there. Over here is the well that is already there. At this location there is already a test well that the sidewalk would go on top of. ~. Mr. Ward: Are you going to use it. Mr. Accardo: When a test well has been driven, it can be used for. Mr. Ward: Cap it. Mr. Accardo: Cap it and drill a well a two feet away. Mr. Ward: No, just put the cap in the sidewalk. Like you do with anything else. Mr. Mullen: It is not unusual. Mr. Accardo: O.K. Tree lighting and pole conflict. I can move the lighting, that is no problem. Planning Board Page 17 ~y 9, 1988 Mr. Ward: We would like to also see what you had in mind for lighting because to date we have not been too enthralled with what we have been seeing going up. Mr. Accardo: If you are looking at the one, I did not design the lighting. If you look at the original, it is totally different. The developer changed it. Mr. Ward: So, we would like to see the drawing and everything right on here. Mr. Accardo: It was on the last one and they didn't build it like that. Mr. Ward: I understand. They don't have there C.O. yet either. Mr. Accardo: Another question, you wanted the dumpsters moved. Is there any reason or do you just feel that site will flow better that way. Ms. Scopaz: You want a truck to be able to come in and pick up the load without having to back up into Cox Neck Lane. A lot of people take that turn fast. It has potential for a bad accident if you have a truck backing out. Mr. Ward: It is also out of the way. Mr. Accardo: Alright. I have no problems doing the curb returns here. Making this a radius. The main and serious question is back here because that is going to reduce, I would have to eliminate the parking. If I push the building forward... Mr. Ward: You can come forward four feet. Mr. Accardo: If I come forward ~y curbs along the front right here will get severely reduced. This side is very tight. I can come into the landscaping more. I will have to be done. Mr. Orlowski: You can make the building smaller. Mr. Accardo: Right now the proposed is fourteen point eight percent and we are allowed thirty. Mr. Latham: You said yourself, it is very tight. Mr. Accardo: I understand that, but right now all the plans were all designed and drawn and I think that would be little bit much to change. When I originally started the plan I have a letter of the Town requirements. The first statement was that I submit six site plans. It said nothing about scale. This scale here was originally agreed upon, then you changed the requirements. Actually, on the first thing listed a 1"=20' scale to be required. Planning Board Page 18 ~y 9, 1988 Mr. Ward: If you had shown all those concrete bumpers then we wouldn't be confused. Mr. Accardo: Can we leave the scale? Is that O.K.? Because to redraw this would be a lot of work to go up in scale. In the future I will gladly draw something at 1"=20'. However, this is a lot of work that went into this and to redraw it at a different scale is really a big expense. Mr. Ward: It seems to me that you have enough changes on there that you will be erasing most of it off anyway. Mr. Accardo: I don't see that we have nearly that many changes. I can submit to you, I can have it enlarged on the machine. It is not going to be exactly accurate. Mr. Ward: It won't be able to show some of these relationships with your bumpers. You say you are not having them out here. Mr. Accardo: I will increase this to twenty foot. I would like to resolve some of these things this evening because that twenty foot is going to cut out another five spaces. If I push the building forward and keep this twenty four feet. Ms. Scopaz: What is the rational with keeping twenty four feet? Mr. Accardo: A car that pulling out of any one of these areas, if another car were passing there is not enough of a turning radius for this car to make that turn while that car was passing. Twenty four feet minimum code usually. Ms. Scopaz: We are not talking about Smith Haven Mall here, we are talking about a small shopping center. Most people will probably come in off the County Road and go to it in a one way sweep through. Mr. Accardo: I don't see the rationale in reducing safety so that no one will park here. It is listed as no parking i~ is a fire zone. Ms. Scopaz: It's a fire zone? Mr. Accardo: Yes. It is a fire zone because you need fire access for the fire engines around the building. They wouldn't be able to get back here. It has to be kept clear. That is why it is down as a fire zone. Mr. Mullen: It takes up quite a bit of area too. Mr. Accardo: To reduce that to twenty just so no one parks there is really is creating a hazard on the site. Mr. Ward: I think that tonight the impact that we have ended up with is four foot in this stretch. Planning Board Page 19 May 9, 1988 Mr. Accardo: I am going to push it four foot forward to put the sidewalk back here. Mr. Ward: Once you do that I think you are going to find that the measure is drawn up to twenty scale. You have erased every line on the paper. Mr. Accardo: If I can do things with the dimension then I don't have to change the drawing. Just change the dimensions. The drawing is staying the same. All the erasing is right here. I can give you an enlargement of the print. It is not going to be a formal sheet like this. It would be an enlargement of just the site, if that is acceptable. That is no problem and I will make all the revisions on the enlargement. Mr. Ward: Well, whatever you can do. Whether it is an enlargement or redo. Whatever, we would want to see this. Make sure you get the curb stops and things in. Those are things we didn't realize you had. Mr. Accardo: That is no problem. Mr. Ward: The other option in doing that is since you are putting a curb in anyway would be to do this. (Marked on map) Mr. Accardo: That is a large e:fpense. People don't like. The curb stop is fine. It is actually very heavy. It is not going any where if you hit it. It has an angle on it. Mr. Ward: We had another question. What about the sketches and that you gave us on the building? What seems to be going on? Mr. Accardo: This is the original sketch I submitted. Here are the building elevations. They are actually quite similar. In fact I think they are nicer then the original sketch. We are using brick and vinyl. A nice asphalt roof that looks like a wood roof. We are putting planted boxes out along the sidewalk. They want to make the site look nice. They are not trying to cut any cgrners. I just like to get it through. It is making me look bad. I have done a lot of jobs. I just wish this could finish up soon pretty quickly. Ms. Scopaz: You have three different kinds of siding you have brick in the front, cedar siding on the sides, stucco in the back. Mr. Accardo: The back no one sees. Mr. Ward: Why do you have parking there. Mr. Accardo: F~mployee parking. Do you want cedar in the back. Mr. Ward: We would just like to see, if we have a shot at it, if we can continue the same material around the building and not break it up. Mr. Mullen: You never know what is going to come down the road. Planning Board Page 20 May 9, 1988 Mr. Ward: What is you front going 'to be? You had a brick? Mr. Accardo: Right. Mr. Latham: You mentioned vinyl, where is that. Mr. Accardo: I forgot we changed it to cedar. It is going to be an attractive center. We are trying to make it. Mr. Ward: Actually out here, this does not have to be a continuous sidewalk. Put the curb down. Mr. Accardo: Put the curb in front of the doors. Mr. Ward: No, put the curb all the way through. Give us the pad at the doors and then you can plant this. In other words, it does not have to be thick stuff. Just put something there. This will give us the safety of someone opening a door and not being into that traffic. Mr. Accardo: There were a couple of other things. Such as the traffic study. Could you tell me, you said if there was any road improvement required that you would let me know. I have not heard anything and it has been a while. Have we made any progress on that. Ms. Scopaz: We have traffic reports from Sidney Bowne's. Mr. Accardo: I spoke to Sidney Bowne and they are strictly handling the drainage and the site itself and they were not getting involved with the traffic. Ms. Scopaz: We asked them to review the traffic studies as well. The County had indicated to the Town that they have done an independent traffic analysis that the County recommended that the Town assess what the changes might be on the Town Road. That is why Sidney Bowne has asked for there review. I think the Board will discuss their comments now. Mr. Ward: How do you feel about the elevations? How would you like to see them done? Just to simplify it a little, so we stucco one way, brick another. Mr. Accardo: I don't have a problem with doing the final elevations. Keeping it the two materials, I just want to make the project go. Mr. Ward: Alright. And the point is that there is parking there, so we get the circulation there. Mr. Latham: Is there any trees along there. Mr. Accardo: Everything that is listed is staying there. They are all listed as existing, so they are staying there. I tried to work with any large caliper that was existing, to keep it there. So we increase the width of the island here and put the four sidewalk. Assume we can leave this. Planning Board Page 21 May 9, 1988 Mr. Ward: Yes, we just didn't see how it was worked with the curb line. Mr. Accardo: Do you object to curb in the front? Should I move it? Mr. Ward: No. Mr. Accardo: Fine. So just based on the comments made tonight, I will make those revisions. Do feel it is going to go through pretty soon, hopefully? Have you heard anything about the traffic? Mr. Orlowski: It is in Sidney Bowne's report. Do you have a copy of that? Mr. Accardo: No I do not. Mr. Mullen: April 24th. Mr. Accardo: Could you mail me a copy of this, so I can address it. Hopefully the next pass will be the final pass. Mr. Orlowski: It is not so bad. Mr. Mullen: It could be worse. Mr. Accardo: It could be worse, but my client is getting impatient. Mr. Orlowski: It is a sensitive site, so we have to make sure it is right. O.K. On this proposal are you going to keep the name, The Shoppes at Southold? Mr. Accardo: No, that is up in the air. Mr. Orlowski: I think it would be very confusing to everybody in Southold if you tried that. Mr. Accardo: That is really just a job name that we put in the office to do our book keeping. The final discission wili be the applicant's. Thank you. Mr. Orlowski: O.K. On this proposal everything is order for a negative declaration in regards to SEQRA. The time is up other then the traffic which they will be addressing. Timewise, we are over the limit. We could condition on the traffic. Mr. Ward: O.K. I'd go. So move, subject to a mitigating effect on the traffic. Mr. Orlowski: Just in case there is a environmental impact on the traffic study when it is complete. Can I have a motion on that? Mr. Ward: So moved. Mr. Latham: Second. Planning Board Page 22 May 9, 1988 Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion?' All those in favor? Vote of the Board; Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. Mr. Orlowski: Being as I have nothing left on my agenda, any questions from the Board. Mr. Mullen?, Mr. Latham?, Ward? Board Members: No questions. Mr. Mullen: Make a motion to adjourn. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Ms. Scopaz? Ms. Scopaz: No. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Ail those in favor? Vote of the Board; Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. Mr. Gustavson: May I have an opertunity to address the Board? Or is the meeting now over? Mr. Orlowski: The meeting is now over. Mr. Gustavson: I did not expect any action, I actually want some advice. Some guidance regarding the Suffolk Times building in Mattituck. We had hoped to be on the agenda tonight. I understand an inspection was made last week. There is a couple.of problems. One with the parking lot and another with a bank that was not landscaped. My question is, is there any possibility of provisional approval, site plan approval, based on a couple of small details on very large project. We are scheduled to move there in about ten days. If we can not move in May, we might as well not move till September. Because we have to put a paper out on Wednesday night and begin moving at six a.m. on a Thursday to next weeks paper out. Doing it in the middle of the summer really becomes a very difficult situation. I believe virtually everything else that you have asked for has been done. We acknowledge that there were puddles in the parking lot. Two small ones, I think. The contractor said that he will come back and reroll it. I am just wondering do we really have to wait two weeks, I guess we do now that the meeting is over. Two weeks to get you folks to pass it. Mr. Orlowski: The policy of this Board has always been any approval that we give, the final approval that we give. The project must be DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CO~JTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE March 22, 1988 A. BARTON CASS, P.E. COMMISSIONER Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: C.R. 48, "The Shoppes at Southold", n/w/c of Cox's Neck Road Dear Ms. Scopaz: This Department's Traffic Division has reviewed the "Traffic Evaluation" Study by George Michos submitted to us by your office on March 9, 1988. We feel that the conclusions presented by Mr. Michos in his report has accurately described the impact of this development on the adjacent road system. This Department is prepared to issue a permit for ingress only as well as curbing and paving (on County Road 48). It would be beneficial to the Town to also require the developer to install similar roadway improvements along the frontage of the Town road, Cox's Neck Road. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours, CRM/MPC/jfb C. ROGER MEEKER CHIEF ENGINEER ~ ?aul Campag~ol~ Jun±or Civil E'ng~neer DEPARTMENT OF' PUBLIC WORK~ C~I)uNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE March 22, 1988 A. BARTON CASS, P.E. Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: C.R. 48, "The Shoppes at Southold", n/w/c of Cox's Neck Road Dear Ms. Scopaz: This Department's Traffic Division has reviewed the "Traffic Evaluation" Study by George Michos submitted to us by your office on March 9, 1988. We feel that the conclusions presented by Mr. Michos in his report has accurately described the impact of this development on the adjacent road system. This Department is prepared to issue a permit for ingress only as well as curbing and paving (on County Road 48). It would be beneficial to the Town to also require the developer to install similar roadway improvements along the frontage of the Town road, Cox's Neck Road. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours, CRM/MPC/j fb C. ROGER MEEKER CHIEF ENGINEER M. Paul Campag~o~ Junior Civil E~ngfneer Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 To: Ray Jacobs, Highway Superintendent From: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: "The Shoppes", N/W/C C.R. 48 and Cox's Neck Road, Mattituck Date: April 7, 1988 The enclosed letter from Paul Campagnola suggests the installation of roadway improvements along Cox's Neck Road by the developer of "The Shoppes". Your input as to what improvements should be made on the Town road would be appreciated. cc: Robert W. Brown jt T~ .-c~ ,D $ Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 May 10, 1988 Scott Accardo 931 Hallock Avenue Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 RE: Shoppes at Southold (Matt.) SCTM %1000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. Accardo: The following action was taken by the Southold Town planning Board on Monday, May 9, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town planning Board make a determination under the State Environmental Quality Act of nonsignificance with conditions. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. enc: Very truly yours· BENNETT ORLOWSKI · JRC/ CHAIRMAN ~ TO~D S U~TY Southold, N,Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 05/10/88 CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR part 617, Section 617, Section 617.10 and chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the enVironment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The site plan for the Shoppes at Southold, located at Cox Neck Road, Mattituck is zoned B-light Business on 60,070. square feet. SCTM 91000-121-2-1. CONDITIONS OF DECLARATION This Conditional Negative Declaration is declared for this Unlisted Action with the provision that the potential traffic~ impacts be addressed to the Planning Board's satisfaction. Specifically, the Boards requests additional information as per the Engineer's report dated April 24, 1988. REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Because there has been no correspondence received from the NY State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold subdivision of Land Regulations. Further information can be obtained by contacting Jill M. Thorp, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. CoPies mailed to the following: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk county Planning Commission NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Supervisor Murphy Thomas C. Jorling, DEC Commissioner Judith Terry, Town Clerk Town Board Applicant April 18, 1988 Ms. Valerie Scopaz Town of Southold Planning Board Main Street Soul. hold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Scopaz; I have reviewed the comments of board listed in a letter dated April 7, 1988. In this letter numerous revisions are requested. I would like to address the following comments: 1 & 2 Please review item #1 enclosed. It is a copy of standard minimum roadway widths for various parking arrangements. This information was taken from Architectural Graphic Standards, a book that every Architect relies upon for basic information. If as you requested the plan was revised to include an eight foot landscape buffer along with a four foot sidewalk along the rear of the building, you can clearly see that the minimum dimension of thirty five feet for this parking arrangement would be encroached upon by seven feet. This proposed revision would virtually expunge sixteen required parking spaces. 3. A reduction in the front aisle depth from the minimum of twenty four feet for a two way roadway down to twenty feet would force this to be a one way road. I think you will agree that this would seriously impede the traffic flow on the site. 5. Why should I delete the sidewalk along c.r. 48 and Cox's Neck Road, and install a sidewalk along the front of the exterior parking aisles where nobody would ever use it? 6. If a three foot island is "too narrow" to sustain a tree with a maximum caliper of six inches, then how could a tree grate, such as the one yellowed out on item #2 enclosed be used in concrete side walks everywhere as a standard minimum size? The biggest problem I have with all of the requests you have made, is that the final site plan be drawn at 1" =20' scale. Town of Southold Planning Board blain Street Southold, N~ 11971 page -2- The plan submitted is "not" a preliminary plan. Thi. s plan was drawn in October of 1987, enclosed you will also find items 3 & 4, copies submissions. Please note Sca i e of Southold Towns requirements ['or site pJan There is no date on item 3 but this is the package when I originally began drawing the site plan. that the first requirement of this document does not minimum scale. Your requirements changed you can see on item ~4's requirement for' a 1" Site Plan. If you review items 5 & 6 enclosed, you will sec thai the issue of the drawing scale was never brought up before aow, therefore, I do not feel compelled to add the considerable expense of re- drawing the site plan at 1" = 20', to my clients fee. In closing, I would like to say that I understand Southold Town i s making an effort to become organized and provide it ' s residents with the proper protection a professional planning department can offer, however, I feel your department kas handled this project in a very unprofessional manor adding additional requirments in bits and pieces rather than studyin~ the plan "once" and making a list of "final" requirements to adhere to. >Iy client has been screaming and yelling at we because of your [nconsi stoncy. I would like a private review of this plan with yourself, Mr. Orlowski, Jr., myself and anyone else necessary to bring this site plan to all approval[. Your immediate attention to this matter is appreciated. Scoti Accardo Associate/Designer Mr. Frank Murphy Mr. Bennett Orlowski >lt. Victor Lassard >ir. J. Shavolian Jr Sidney B. Bowne, PE., L.S. (1922-1959) Chester C Kelsey, P.E,, L,S. Alexandre W. Mercil, PE. Robert A. Stanton, P,E, Robert W. Brown, L.S. Zabdiel A Blackman, P.E., L.S. George A. Style, P.E. Jerry D. Alrnont, P E George L. Fagan, Jr., Ph.D., PE, Thomas R. Pynchon, LS SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 (516) 724-0611 April 24, 1988 Roland Anders Frank Capobianco Roger L Cocchi Francis J Lynch Philip Schlotzhauer Joseph F Stegman PaulF Stevens Wiltiam T Styne Richard B Weber Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southod, N.Y. 11971 Re: The Shoppes at Southold Traffic Engineering Review SBB No. 87272 Dear Ben: The "Traffic Evaluation" as submitted by the applicant, requires additional data. Information is required concerning the southerly portion of the intersection. More specifically, the geometrics of the Sound Avenue northerly bound approach and southerly bound exiting lanes need to be addressed. The traffic impact on these lanes also need an evaluation. The relationship of the shopping center easterly access driveway, which abuts CR 48 and the northerly approach of Sound Avenue requires an evaluation from both a traffic impact and highway geometric sense. The channelized turning lanes of Coxes Neck Road at CR 48 are controlled by YIELD signs. This information is not stated in the report. The traffic volumes are based on traffic volume counts conducted February 5, 1988. While the traffic counts sheet includes a "seasonal correction factor", the level of service and capacity analysis did not incorporate this factor in the calculations. The Mattituck area has a recreational traffic pattern with summer traffic volumes much higher than February volumes. Historic traffic count data are available from the Suffolk County Department of Public Works for traffic on CR 48. This data should be incorporated into the traffic analysis in order to address the seasonal traffic variations. A full evaluation cannot be conducted until the above data is submitted. Very truly yours, SID~NE & S~ ~BERT W. B~,- L.S. RWB :dmd MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 7, 1988 Mr. Scott Accardo Miller Associates 931 Hallock Avenue Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 RE: The Shoppes at Southold SCTM # 1000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. Accardo: The Planning Board reviewed the enclosed comments on the traffic study. The Board has asked the Town Highway Superintendent and the Town Engineering consultant to determine what road improvements will be required for Cox's Neck Lane. Subsequently, the elevation drawings and site plan were reviewed and found to be lacking in some information. Attached you will find the checklist from the site plan application package with the incomplete items so marked. Also enclosed is a marked copy of the site plan showing revisions that should be made to the site. The list of road improvements, if any are needed, will be sent to you under separate cover when they are received. The following list is a synopsis of the requested changes: The proposed landscaping along the north property line abuts a residential district. In order to provide more effective screening, the landscaping area should be widened to eight feet in width, and the plantings should be changed to a mix of evergreen species, such as the existing native cedars, arborvitae and canadian hemlock. (The trees should be 5' to 6' high and planted 8' to 10' O.C.) 2o A curb should be placed along the rear of the building at least 4' from the building to protect service users of the back doors from being hit by cars or delivery vehicles. The front aisle between the building and the landscaped islands should be reduced to 20 feet to discourage parking in that area. Dumpster should be moved to the northeast corner of the building so that garbage truck does not block entry to Cox Neck Road, and does not have to back out into that road. 5. Delete sidewalk along C.R. 48 and Cox's Neck Road. Landscaping islands in parking lot are too narrow to sustain plantings. See notes on map. Note which trees will be saved and which are being replaced by other landscaping along public street right of ways. 8. Show type and wattage of lighting fixtures proposed. Plantings and sidewalk alongside building should be as noted on enclosed plan. The elevation sketch did not appear to match the site plan. Please provide facade drawings for the east, west, north and south sides of the buildings. Indicate type of construction, and type and height of roof line on the drawings. Upon receipt of the revised site plans at a scale of 1"=20~ the Planning Board will be able to proceed with its review. If there are any questions, please contact this office. cc: Robert Brown Sidney B. Bowne & Son Victor Lessard jt Sincerely, go~n Planner for Bennett Orlo~sk±,~r. Chairman Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 28, 1988 Mr. Scott Accardo Miller Associates 931 Hallock Avenu Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 RE: The Shoppes at Southold SCTM ~ 1000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. Accardo: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, March 21, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself Lead agent under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The Southold Town Planning Board discussed the trafic report and decided to have its engineer review the traffic study report. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. jt Very truly yours, BENNETTT ORLOWSKI , JR. ~ CHAIRMAN Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 03/22/88 Environmental Analysis Unit DEC, Building 40, Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find a completed Short Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the map of the site plan of The Shoppes at Southold. This project is unlisted and an initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. We wish to coordinate this action to confirm our initial determination. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until April 21, 1988. We shall interpret lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and our agency will assume the status of lead agency. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.,CHAIRMAN enc. cc: Department of Health Service Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 9, 1988 Roger Meeker Chief Engineer Suffolk County Department of Public Works Yaphank Avenue Yaphank, NY 11980 RE: Traffic Evaluation for north west corner of intersection of County Road 48 and Cox's Neck Road, Mattituck. SCTM9 1000-121-2-1 Dear Mr. Meeker: As per the phone conversation Melissa Spiro had with your office, I am enclosing the Traffic Evaluation for The Shoppes at Southold. Your assistance in reviewing this would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Town Planner GEORGE B. MICHOS, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER 101 Longfellow Lane Port Jefferson, NY 11777 (516) 928-8237 THE SHOPPE$ AT $OUTHOLD Traffio Evaluation Prepared For: Hiddle Road Aagoalatm9 ~/o Amlook Assoolata9 426 Northern Boulmvard, Room Great Neok, NY 11021 February 1988 C SUMMARY: This report presents an evaluation of the traffic impacts of a proposed 9,000 SF retail center in Mattituck, NY. The report considers the existing residential and commercial traffic and the impacts of the traffic generated by the proposed use on the adjacent roadway. The results of this analysis indicate that: o The traffic generated by the proposed use viii not reduce the level of service of the adjacent roadway o The key intersections providing access to the site can accomodate the added traffic with the existing geometry. o Widening of the pavement along Cox Neck Rd. adjacent to the site is shown on the site plan and ts recommended. INTHODUCTION The purpose of this report is to examine the traffic impacts associated with the proposed development of a 1.~8 acre site in Mattituck, NY into a 9,000 SF retail center. Vehicle access to the site is from Cox Neck Hd. on the west side of the site, and Middle Hd.(CH 48) on the south. Cox Neck Hd. is a Town of Southcld public highway, and CH 48 is a Suffolk County highway. The ma]or arterial roadways serving the area of the project are CH 48 on the south and SH 25 .86 mi. south of the site. Local Town roads provide access to the residential and commercial areas north and sooth of the site. This evaluation is based on the following considerations: * Existing traffic counts on the adjacent and area road network. * The effect of the traffic generated by the proposed development on the local street system. ~ The existing conditions at the key intersections providing access to the site. In performing this evaluation we obtained existing traffic data from field traffic counts. We also observed traffic activity at the key intersections along CH 48. Figure 1 is a location map showing the project site, and area road network. An Appendix is provided containing traffic engineering terms which are pertinent to this project, worksheets and calculations and traffic count data. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS: At the proposed project site, CR 48 is a two lane highway west of the site and a 4 lane divided highway east of the site. There are paved shoulders on both sides of the road. The pavement is generally 24 ft. wide and the shoulders are 8-10 ft. wide on both sides of the road. Parking is not prohibited along this road. :APTAIN I::STAT~:$ A~A LAUREL UC OREGON FIGURE l~ PROJECT LOCATION Traffic controls consist of stop signs on the roads intersecting Middle Rd. from the north and south. The alignment of CR A8 is slightly curved and level east and west of the project site. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES: To assess the impact of the proposed use on the adjacent roadway network, it is necessary to initially establish existing or baseline conditions. Traffic volumes on CR 48 and Cox Neck Rd. were calculated from on-site counts during the week of Feb. 1-5, 1988. From these sources the ~ollowing PM peak hour volumes were established as existing conditions: EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PM PEAK HOUR Highway Peak Hour Volume vph E Bd. W. Bd N. Bd. S. Rd CE 48 244 393 Cox Neck Rd. 99 89 GENERATED TRAFFIC: In order to estimate the traffic generated by the proposed site use and predict the routes this traffic would use, the following procedures were used: 1. Trip Generation: Generation rates were calculated using the "Trip Generation Report - Third Edition" of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The proposed use of the site ~s a shopping center less than SO, O00 and the ITE report indicates that the PM peak hour is the critical period for this use. The generation rates are 7.19 trips/lOOOSF inbound and 7.23 trips/lOOOSF outbound. -Zo7 Shopping Center with 9,000 SF PM peak hour trips 7.19 x 9.0 = 65 vph inbound 7.23 x 9.0 = 66 vph outbound Total PM peak hour trips = 131 vph The traffic assignment to the adjacent roads is shown on Figure ~. 2. Traffic Assignment: CR 48 and Cox Neck Rd. provide access to the project site and all traffic was assigned to these roads. Inbound and outbound splits were based on the ITE factors noted above. Traffic splits for the project entrances are based on access road directional splits and location of the parking area entrances. All figures are for the PM peak hour, 5-6 PM. CAPACITY ANALYSIS: Intersection capacity analyses were performed for the unsignalized intersections aleng Cox Neck Rd. at the project entrance and CR 48. The methodology employed in the analysis is that published in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) of the Transportation Research Board. 1. CR 48 & Entrance: This is an unsignalized 'T' intersection with stop sign control. Left and right turns share lanes. Unsignalized intersection capacity analysis of this location was made using turning movements estimated from the traffic generation data and counts on Cox Neck Rd. The results are shown in Table 1 below. 2. CR 48 Cox Neck Rd. This is an unsignalized four leg intersection with stop sign control on Cox Neck Rd. The southerly leg of the intersection is one-way southbound. Capacity analysos for this location woro done for the oxisting conditions and adding the project traffic. Tho results are given in Ff§ure 1 betow. From the data presented in Table proposed project will not reduce entrance, or at the intersection. 1 it is evident that tho the LOS at tho project TABLE 1: INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) EXISTING W/PROJECT Cox Neck Rd. & Entrance Lt from Entrance Rt from Entrance Lt from Cox Neck Rd CR 48 b Cox Neck Rd. Lt from Cox Neck Rd Rt from Cox Neck Rd Lt from CR 48 A A A B B A A A A CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the development of the proposed Shoppes ~ Southold will not reduce the level of service of the adjacent roadway. The unsignalized intersections at the project entrances and CR 48 will provide a satisfactory level of service for left turn movements. Since the existing roadways and intersections will provide Summer traffic in the area will increase the volumes by approximately 30%. This additional traffic will not significantly reduce the LOS at the project entrances or at the CR 48 intersection. APPENDIX: 1. Glosary of Traffic Engineering Terms 2. Traffic Counts 3. Intersection Diagrams and Worksheets APPENDIX A GLOSSARY OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TERMS Traffic Generation: The initial step in an impact study of this nature is the determination of how much traffic (number of vehicle trips) will be generated by the proposed facility. This generation estimate is the basis of all additional. estimation and calculation. Existinq Traffic Pattern: This concerns the present use of the highway network involved and it is upon this traffic volume that the new traffic generated by the proposed development is superimposed. Projected traffic volumes are a combination of these two factors: namely, existing traffic volumes and traffic generated by 'the proposed facility (surcharge traffic). Trip Distribution: The origin and destination of vel'~icile trips. The proposed development would be one trip end and the employees/visitors origin or destination would be the other trip end. Traffic Assiqnment~: After the traffic generation and distribution have been defined, it is necessary to decide which roadway links will be used by vehicles commuting to and from the site. This information is superimposed on existing traffic volumes to project future traffic on specific roadways. THAFFIC COUNTS February 5, 1988 Cox NB Neck Rd. SB EB WB 7-Oam 8-9 9-10 10-11 ll-12n 12-1pm 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 80 71 22! 78 69 i90 83 73 213 91 84 234 99 89 244 301 307 327 383 393 Seasonal correction factor 1.08 WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS LOCATION: ~,~, ;..~..,-~ ~ ~ ~-~-~'~'~r,;- NAME: '~,%'~-~ ~,-~,,~c.~ HOURLY VOLUMES Major Street: N Grade 0'3 -- V2 o_Q_% -26'_ v~ Date of Counts:. Tune Period: ~'- Average Running Speed: PHF: ~t~ Grade_ ~ V7 V9 I [] smo YIELD Minor | jtreet: VOLUMES IN PCPH ~ V5 I ,,;TE ......... l ANALYSIS :ox ~imc~: ~o. ~ ~,'Oi. (pcpn~ I' Confi!ct~n~ Flow ~5.5 4c~uai Ca~acl:'/ 1000 £onfilcting Flow Crit. Gay, Tz &Cv4 980 Tc:5.5 %Cp Useo & Impel. factor 0.92 ~ctual Capacity 980 Sonflictin~ Flow 19~.5 Crit. Gap, Tc &Cv7 7~ Ac;uai Capacity 7~ Tc=6.5 Share~ Lane Capacity Cs~ 75J Movement vtmmph) Cm(pcpfl) Csh(vc~b) ~R LOS 7 63 725 725 662 A 9 10 1000 1000 99~ A 4 10 ~80 ~80 970 A 57 63 ANALYSIS CF, 48, & Cox r~e.rk Rd. F:~ FeaK LT FROM MAJOR STREET V4 ~! Oanfhcsin9 Flows. Cz 228 J~S Critical Sap, Tc 5.5 5.5 ;otential Cap., Cp S50 700 ?ercenr o+ Cp Utilized 0,0 2.5 ~m=eOen:e Rac~or. ~ i .98 ~c=uai Cap.. Sa4. i ~50 700 Critical Sap, 7c ~.5 0.5 Fet%en~ cf CD U~ihzeo 0.0 2.~ ImDedence Fac=oP. R i .~8 LT FROM MINOR STREET ¢7 ¥!0 2onflIctin9 Flows. V: 684 5?5.5 Sritical Gap. T: 0.5 6.5 Foten~ial CAF.. C~ S75 425 Actual Cap.. Ca 7, 10 ~46 417 -'; N=~] V,V, V,~ I YIELD{Z] Grade, O, SHARED LANE C.FACI"f 2 ~vemen~s shape a lane 710 & Vll :/7 & V8 ERROR /lO, VIi. V!2 ¢7,VS,V? ~ROR MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7,8,9 Movemen~ v(pcpni Cm(pcpD) Csh(pcpn)Cr=Csh-v LOS 7 0 ~46 ;46 ~46 S 8 0 392 5~2 $~2 B MINOR STREET AFPROACH MOVEMENTS D, l112 I0 S1 417 417 588 ~ II 12 421 42! 409 A !2 55 750 ~0 695 A MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4 ! 18 700 682 A 4 0 850 850 A FOUR-LEG INTERSECTION ANALYSIS CE RT FROM ~2.iOR STRE ET Crltlcal Gao, T~ erc~ns of r~ Usslizeo :.1 ?.,.7 FROM MAJOR STREET ?4 :onfiic;Ing Ficws. /c 228 Cr~t:cal Sap, T~ 5,5 5.5 F'o~en~zal Cap, ~- S50 700 Fercen~ of C~ dtZlzzeo '>.C~ ;m~eOence Fa~or. ~ ; 4ctuai Cap., J,:~4. : ~50 ":, 7H ~R2M MINOR STREET ,.~ ,~ Crzt~caz Ga~. Tc ~.5 F'oten~al Cap., C~ 400 405 Percon~ of Cp Utilizeo 0.0 ~.0 lmpeoence Factor, P : .78 Actual Cap., C~8, i1 JS8 593 LT FROM MINOR STREET '/7 ViU Conflictinq Flows, Vc 739 ~ = Critical Gao, Tc ~.5 s.5 ~oten~at Ca~.. Cp 545 405 ;HARED LR4E CAPACITY ~,) & VII '/7 ~ V8 ERROR V10, Vii. YI2 V7, VS. V? ERROR MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7~8,9 Movement v(pcpn) Cm(pcpn~ CshiDcoD~Cr=Csh-v LOS 8 0 SSB 388 588 B 9 0 875 S~ 875 A MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS i0, ii12 lO 55 393 J~3 ~38 B 12 BB 750 750 662 A MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4 i 40 700 ~60 ~ 4 0 850 850 A PM Peai~ Grade % GEORGE B. MICHOS, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER 101 Longfellow Lane Port Jefferson, NY 11777 (516) 928-8237 THE SHOPPES AT SOUTHOLD Traffio Evaluation Prepared For: Middle Road Assoolatea c/o Amlock Assoolate~ 426 Northern Boulevard, Room Great Neck, NY 11021 February t988 SUMMARY: This report presents an evaluation of the traffic impacts of a proposed 9,000 SF retail center in Mattituck, NY. The report considers the existing residential and commercial traffic and the impacts of the traffic generated by the proposed use on the adjacent roadway. The results of this analysis indicate that: o The traffic &enerated by the proposed use will not reduce the level of service of the adjacent roadway o The key intersections providing access to the site can accomodate the added traffic with the existing geometry. o Widening of the pavement along Cox Neck Rd. adjacent to the site is shown on the site plan and is SOUTHO[O TOWN INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to examine the traffic impacts associated with the proposed development of a 1.38 acre site in Mattituok, NY into a 9,000 SF retail center. Vehicle access to the site is from Cox Neck Rd. on the west side of the site, and Middle Rd.(CE 48) on the south. Cox Neck Rd. is a Town of Southold public highway, and CR 48 is a Suffolk County highway. The major arterial roadways serving the area of the project are CR 48 on the south and SR 25 .66 mi. south of the site. Local Town roads provide access to the residential and commercial areas north and south of the site. This evaluation is based on the following considerations: * Existing traffic counts on the adjacent and area road network. ) The effect of the traffic generated by the proposed development on the local street system. ~ The existing conditions at the key intersections providing access to the site. In performing this evaluation we obtained existing traffic data from field traffic counts. We also observed traffic activity at the key intersections along CR 48. Figure I is a location map showing the project site, and area road network. An Appendix is provided containing traffic engineering terms which are pertinent to this project~ worksheets and calculations and traffic count data. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS~ At the proposed project site, CR 48 is a two lane highway west of the site and a 4 lane divided highway east of the site. There are paved shoulders on both sides of the road. The pavement is generally 24 ft. wide and the shoulders are 8-10 ft. wide on both sides of the road. Parking is not prohibited along this road. ~APTAIN ESTATES CON$KNVAYION AI~EA LAUREL UCK OREGON ~T EAST F'[GURE .1.-- PROJ'ECT L. OCAT[C]N Traffic controls consist of stop signs on the roads intersecting Middle Rd. from the north and south. The alignment of CR 48 is slightly curved and level east and west of the project site. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES: To assess the impact of the proposed use on the adjacent roadway network, it is necessary to initially establish existing or baseline conditions. Traffic volumes on CR 48 and Cox Neck Rd. were calculated from on-site counts durin8 the week of Feb. 1-5, 1988. From these sources the following PM peak hour volumes were established as existing conditions: EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES PM PEAK HOUR Highway Peak Hour Volume vph E Bd. W. Bd N. Bd. S. Bd CR 48 244 393 Cox Neck Rd. 99 89 GENERATED TRAFFIC: In order to estimate the traffic generated by the proposed site use and predict the routes this traffic would use, the following procedures were used: 1. Trip Generation: Generation rates were calculated using the "Trip Generation Report - Third Edition- of the Institute of Transportation Ensineer9 (ITE). The proposed use of the site is a shopping center les9 than 50,000 SF, and the ITE report indicates that the PM peak hour is the critical period for this use. The generation rates are 7.19 trips/lOOOSF inbound and 7.23 trips/iOOOSF outbound. · Zo7 Shopping Center with 9,000 SF PM peak hour trips : 7.19 x 9.0 = 65 vph inbound 7.23 x 9.0 : 66 vph outbound Total PM peak hour trips = 131 vph The traffic assignment to the adjacent roads is shown on Figure ~. 2. Traffic Assignment: CR 48 and Cox Neck Rd. provide access to the project site and all traffic was assigned to these roads. Inbound and outbound splits were based on the ITE factors noted above. Traffic splits for the project entrances are based on access road directional splits and location of the parking area entrances. All figures are for the PM peak hour, 5-6 PM. CAPACITY ANALYSIS: Intersection capacity analyses were performed unsignalized intersections along Cox Neck Rd. entrance and CR 48. The methodology employed analysis is that Manual for the at the project in the published in the 1985 Highway Capacity (HCM) of the Transportation Research Board. 1. CR 48 & Entrance: This is an unsignalized 'T' intersection with stop sign control. Left and right turns share lanes. Unsignalized intersection capacity analysis of this location was made using turning movements estimated from the traffic generation data and counts on Cox Neck Rd. The results are shown in Table 1 below. 2. CR 48 Cox Neck Rd. This is an unsignalized four leg intersection with stop sign control on Cox Neck Rd. The southerly leg of the intersection is one-way southbound. ~o7 Capacity analyses for this location were done for the existing conditions and adding the project traffic. The results are given in Figure I below. From the data presented in Table ! it is evident that the proposed project will not reduce the LOS at the project entrance, or at the intersection. TABLE 1: INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) EXISTING W/PROJECT Cox Neck Rd. & Entrance Lt from Entrance Rt from Entrance Lt from Cox Neck Rd CR 48 & Cox Neck Rd. Lt from Cox Neck Rd Rt from Cox Neck Rd Lt from CR 48 B B A A A A A A A CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the development of the proposed Shoppes ~ Southold will not reduce the level of service of the adjacent roadway. The unsignaiized intersections at the project entrances and CR 48 will provide a satisfactory level of service for left turn Since the existing roadways and intersections will provide satisfactory level of service, no improvements are necessary. The proposed site plan access is satisfactory and is recommended for approval as shown. Summer traffic in the area will increase the volumes by approximately 30%. This additional traffic will not significantly reduce the LOS at the project entrances or at the CR 48 intersection. APPENDIX: i. Glosary of Traffic Engineering Terms Traffic Counts 3. Intersection Diagrams and Worksheets APPENDIX A GLOSSARY OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TERMS Traffic Generation: The initial step in an impact study of this nature is the determination of how much traffic (number of vehicle trips) will be generated by the proposed facilit, y. This generation estimate is the basis of all additional estimation and calculation. ~¥istinq Traffic Pattern: This concerns the present use of the highway network involved and it is upon this traffic volume that the new traffic generated by the proposed development is superimposed. Projected traffic volumes are a combination of these two factors; namely, e~isting traffic volumes and traffic generated by the proposed facility (surcharge traffic). ~ip Distributi~on: The origin and destina~tion of vehicle trips. The proposed development would be one trip eno and the employees/visitors origin or destination would be the other trip end. ~.raffic Assiqnments: After the traffic generation and distribution have been defined, it is necessary to decide which roadway links will be used by vehicles commuting to and from the site. This information is superimposed on existing traffic volumes to project future traffic on specific roadways. TRAFFIC COUNTS February 5, 1988 Cox NB Neck Rd. SB CR 48 EB 7-Sam 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12n i2-1pm 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 80 7t 221 78 69 83 73 91 84 99 89 213 234 244 301 307 327 383 393 Seasonal correction factor 1.08 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS WORKSHizET FOR ANALYSIS OF LOCATION: 0.~ HOURLY VOLUMES Major Street:_ C~* N--Iq Grade ~3 -- V2 0__% -z~'_ vD Date of Counts: Thee Period: -~-t., Average Running Speed: ~. Grade O % ON ~V~ V~ t I J [] STOV '?g=j.~J [] YIELD Minor J Street: T-INTERSECTIONS NAME: '~,~ ,'~'-~- VOLUMES IN PCPH YTE ........ ~g ANALfSI2 Zox ~ec~ Ea, = - With Sro. jeer Volume Ao~uscments Voi.(pcpnJ I0 Confi!cting Flow ';~P~ 1000 ~c=5.5 from major s~rmet V4 Confllct~n~ Flow 108 Crit. Gap~ lz &~4 980 Tc=5.5 Useo & Im~e~. factor 0.~2 P4= Actual Capaczt¥ 980 Lt. fro~ m~nor street V7 Conflictln~ Flow 193.5 Crit. Ga~, Tz &Cp7 725 Actual £a~acitv 7~ Tc:6.5, ShareO Lane Capacity Csh 75~ Movement v(ncpN~ Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) CR L~ 7 ~3 725 725 662 A ? 10 1~)0 1000 990 A 4 I0 980 ~80 970 A 89 57 9 FOUR-LES ~"? ~ ' m ET FROM MINOR ~7RE ET J~ti~al Gap. F~ ~otent~al Cap., Fercent ~f C~ ~tiii:eo Acruai Cap.. C~9, 12 2!4 375 750 LT FROM MAJOR STREET Conflictin9 Flows. V: 228 795 Critical Gap, Tc 5.5 5.5 Fotential Cap., Cp 850 700 Fercenr of Cp Utii~zeO 0.0 2.3 ~mpe~ence Factor. ~ i .98 Critical Gap, 7c ~orentiai Ca~., :ercen~ of Cp Utilizea 0.0 2.~ [mpedence Factor, ~ I .98 Actual Cap., CmO. II 792 421 LT FROM MINOR STREET v7 Conflictin9 Flows, Vc 684 595.5 C¢itical Gap, Tz 0.5 6.5 Potential Cap., Cp 375 425 Actual Cap.. 5m 7, 10 546 417 Vii 7?9 V8 ERROR 710, ViI,V!2 556 ¢7, VB,V9 ~RDR MINOR STREET APPROA~ MOVEMENTS 7~8,9 Movemen~ v(pcp~) Cm(pcpn~ Csh(pcpniCr=Csh-v LOS 9 ~ 875 875 8~ A MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10,11i2 I0 ~1 417 417 ~$6 B !I 12 421 421 40~ A !2 55 750 750 895 A MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4 ! 18 700 682 A 4 ij 8~0 850 ~ PM F'ea~ v, '~i~ N=L4 major road FOUR-LEG IN~RSECTIO~ ANALYSIS VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS MOVEMENT ~OL. wn 76 RT FROM MINOR STRE ET O~nfliosinq Flows. vc Crmca! Gao, Tc Percen~ o+ Cp Utilized Actual Cap., ~ng, i£ LT FROM MAJOR STREET Confiic~ing Flows. Vc Critical Potential Cap.. ~ercen~ of Cp Jtilizeo ~mpedence Factor. Actual Cap.. ;H FR2M MINOR STRE~ 78 Son~ilotin~ Flows. Vo Crlt~cai Ga~. 7: Foten~ial Cap., C~ Rercen~ o+ Cp Utilizeo Impeoence Factor, P Actual Ca~., CaS, 11 LT FROM MINOR STREET 97 Conflic:in~ Flows, Vc Critical Gap, ~c Roten~ial Cap., Cp 4c~ual Cap., ~ ~, 10 CE 48 & Cox Nec~ Rd. ~it~ Pro.~ec~ V1 5.5 5.5 .~50 700 0.0 5. I i .97 ~50 -00 ~00 ~05 O. 0 4.0 7~9 615.5 ~.5 ~.5 545 405 ]15 J95 PM Pea~ N =~t-] V, V, V, ]YIELDO Grade __% N SHARED LPu~E CAPACITY VII V8 VIO, VlI.V12 VT,VB. V9 ERROR 552 ERROR MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7~,9 Movement v(pcpn) Cm(pcpn) Csh{pc~h~Cr=Csh~v LOS 7 0 315 315 315 B 8 0 388 388 588 B 9 0 B75 875 875 A MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS i0, I112 ii 18 39~ j~ S~ B i2 88 750 750 662 A MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4 i 40 7~) 660 A 4 0 850 ~ A Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 January 29, 1988 Mr. Scott Accardo Miller Associates 931Hallock Avenue Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 RE: The Shoppes at Southold Dear Mr. Accardo: This letter is to reconfirm Melissa Spiro's phone conversation with Rick Wertheim on January 13, 1988 as to the justification of the proposed parking. It is necessary that the revised plan show and explain the use of the "non-retail" area, to aid in the calculation of necessary parking spaces. This can be best accomplished by including a floor plan with the elevation drawings. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, Valerie Scopaz Town Planner Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 766-1938 December 17, 1987 Paul Campagnola Suffolk County Department of Public Works Yaphank Avenue Yaphank, NY 11980 Re: Southold Shoppes at Mattituck Site plan Dear Mr. Campagnola: The Town Planner reviewed the enclosed map for the Planning Board and needs some input as to whether the County would grant a curb cut permit to this property and if so, what conditions would be attached to it. Please refer to the enclosed tax map for additional information about the vacant piece of property to the east of the subject property. If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 December 8, 1987 Mr. Scott Acardo Miller Associates 931Hallock Avenue Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 RE: The Shoppes at Southold Dear Mr. Acardo: The Planning Board has reviewed the above mentioned proposal which yo,r r~c~nt~¥ s,bm~tt~d. Prior to further review the following information is requested: 1. A traffic impact study for the proposal indicating the impact the commercial development will have on Cox Neck Road and County Route 48. 3. Elevation drawings for the buildings. Upon receipt of the above, the Planning Board will proceed with its review. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD, Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 December 8, 1987 Mr. Scott Acardo Miller Associates 931Hallock Avenue Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 RE: The Shoppes at Southold Dear Mr. Acardo: The Planning Board has reviewed the above mentioned proposal which your recently submitted. Prior to further review the following information is requested: 1. A traffic impact study for the proposal indicating the impact the commercial development will have on Cox Neck Road and County Route 48. 2. A justification of the proposed parking. 3. Elevation drawings for the buildings. Upon receipt of. the above, the Planning Board will proceed with its review. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN~ SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 December 8, 1987 Mr. Scott Acardo Miller Associates 931Hallock Avenue Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 RE: The Shoppes at Southold Dear Mr. Acardo: The Planning Board has reviewed the above mentioned proposal which your recently submitted. Prior to further review the following information is requested: 1. A ~raffic impact study for the proposal indicating the impact the commercial development will have on Cox Neck Road and County Route 48. 2. A Justification of the proposed parking. 3. Elevation drawings for the buildings. Upon receipt of the above, the Planning Board will proceed with its review. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN- SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Commissioner of Public Works Suffolk County Yaphank Ave., Yaphank, N. Y. Dear Sir: In accordance with Section 239K of the General Municipal Law of the consolidated Laws of the State of New York, this is to notify the Commis- sioner of Public Works of the County of Suffolk that ..... 6~....~,..12..~...~......~..~.T'. t.~....~..~.~.~.~.v...c.~.....m.~....~.T.~...~,.~ ............ ~ ~..7ZZC~.~C,... ~...~ m, .ff...~....~..!.s...~ .... ,~ so ...... ~.2~..s.... o ................................................... has applied to the Town of Southold for a permit to construct a building on .~....9...~ ....... ...Tf.~.m...~...~..:.~:..-...?.~.~.~.L~..~...~,...~... as shown on the attached plot plan, submitted in triplicate, dated ................ ..... ./....'~.././..~..~.. .................... and titled ..Z~/..~'....~.~J~9~..~ ...........,gV' ..~..9..VZ/~.9/.~/ We shall withhold further action on this application for ten days or as otherwise provided in the aforementioned Section 239K. Very truly yours, 12/29/87 - Approved. to the Town of Southold /-% pursuant.. 'co Section. 239K of tt~ General ~ RECE~NZED BY M~nlclpal Law subject to the stated /. ~ ~ ~- - ~ , ~r~ 1 ' ::' ~ ?. ~ conditions: ~, i .., .... AS per revisions & cc~ents as shown~uilding Inspector ~,~-~?. ~' 1 pursuant 'co Sectio~ 13G o~ ~he I~z. ~T..~.wn of Southold, N. Y. Suffolk County Dept. of Public Works A. Barton Cass, Cc~missioner C. ~ b~KER CHIF~ ENG~R pp,~p.~p~xd NY DOT 7615 ICC MC 121454 BONDED & INSURED 4 THIRD STREET ° GARDEN CITY PARK, N/', 11040 (516) 746-4348 (718) ;~91-2220 DATE . RECEIVED, SUBJECT TO THE CLASSIFICATIONS AND TARIFFS IN EFFECT ON THE DATE OF THE ISSUE OF THiS BILL OF LADING. [] /PRI~ ~ IMMEDIATE [] SCHEDULED [] OVERNIGHT [~ MULTIPLE EXPRESS ~ PACKAGE I [] ENVELOPE [] CARTON OTHER VEIGHT UNLESS A DIFFERENT VALUE IS DECLARED, THE SHIPPER HEREBY RELEASES VALUE THE PROPERTY TO A VALUE NOT EXCEEDING ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS $100.00 PER SHIPMENT CHARGES FOR ADDITIONAL VALUE DECLARED SHALL ~E AT A RATE OF F FTY CENTS (50¢} PER ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100,00). IGNEO PICKUP DRIVER TiME OF DELIVERY AM. PM THIS IS YOUR FREIGHT I~ THIS BILL MUST BE PAID WITHIN 7 DAYS ACCORDING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND INTERSTATE COM~ NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATIONjjPROIECT · DIVISION OF R£GULATORY AFFAIRS State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONI~/1ENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I Project Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) Miller Associates, Architects The Shoppes at Southold 3. Proiect location: Munici;~aliiy Southold Town Co.nW Suffolk 9,000 s.f., 1 story masonry shopping center corner of Cox Neck Road and M~.~io ~oad ~C,~ 48) 7. Amount oi land a~fected: 1 · 38 g Ye, ~ NO N.A. Rick Wertheim 11-4-8 If tho action is in tho Coastal Area, and you aro a stato agoncy, comploto the Coastal Assossment Form boloro procooding with this assossmont OVER $ L~T Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 13, 1987 Scott Accardo, Project Manager Miller Associates 931 Hallock Avenue Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 Re: Sketch of proposed retail stores N/E/c of County Road 48 and Cox Neck Road, Mattituck Dear Mr. Accardo: In response to your letter to Victor Lessard of the BUilding Department, the enclosed sketch was also reviewed by this office. On the sketch the yards areas marked. The side yard in this instance is on the east side of the building. It is recommended that you move the building toward the back of the lot away from the road. I trust this answers your questions as posed in your September 17th letter. Sincerely, Town Planner cc: Victor Lessard ARCHITECTS PLANNERS September 17, 1987 BLDG. DEPT. TOWN OF souTHOLD .... Southold Town Building Department Main Street Southold NY 11978 Attn: Mr. Lessard Dear Vic, Enclosed is a proposed site plan for Retail Stores in Mattituck. The site plan itself is zoned B; light business district. Since it is a corner lot, I am unsure which are the sides and which is the rear. Please review this "sketch" plan and I'll call you on Monday to talk to you about it. Thank you. Very truly yours, Scott Accardo Project Manager SA:dd 931 HALLOOK AVENUE, PORT JEFFERSON STATION, NEW YORK 11776 (516) 331-8555 S FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION qCTION-BLOCK-LOT TAX MAP NUMBERS b WE & ADDRESS OF OWNER OF RECORD NA.~E & ADDRESS OF PERSON PREPARING MAP DATE, NORTH POINT AND WRITTEN & GRAPtlIC SCALE RECEIVED BY SO fl OLD IOW I PLAN I G ~^T~ DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY & INFORMATION TO DEFINE BOUNDARIES LOCATIONS, NAMES & EXISTING wIIJTHs OF ADJACENT STREETS & CURBS LOCATION..&.OWNERS OF ALL ADJ01NING LANDS, AS SHOWN ON TAX RECOkDS LOCATION.& PURPOSE OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS COMPLETE OUTLINE OF EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS APPLYING T© PROP EXISTING ZONING AREAS SUBJECT TO FLOODING OR STORM WATER OVERFLOW,~ WATER COURSES, MARSHES, WOODED AREAS, ANY BUILDING WITHIN 100' OF PROPERTY PAVED AREAS, SIDEWALK~, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO PUBI, IC STREETI~; EXISTING SEWERS, CULVERTS, WATERLINES WITIIIN OR AI)JACENT TO PRg] FENCING LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING PROPOSED BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING AREAS OUTDOOR LIGHTING OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS OUTDOOR SIGNS 239K SIDEWALKS LOCATIONS WIDTHS: SIZE OF WATER ANDC,~EWL.~,, "~' ~,~ NI,.~,'~' 0..~,.,~.~.-~,2,_~ ..l. 01 ~ ~' ~ ' -- REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN. ELEMENTS SECTION-BLOCK-LOT TAX MAP NUMBERS NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER OF RECORD NAME & ADDRESS OF PERSON PREPARING MAI' & CERTIFICATION DATE, NORTH POINT AND WRITTEN & GRAPHIC SCALE DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY & INFORMATION TO DEFINE EOUNDARII':; .LOCATIONS,. NAMES & EXISTING WIfJTHS OF ADJACENT STP. EETS & (:URBS LOCATION_.& . OWNERS OF ALL^D JOINING LANDS, AS SHOWN ON TAX LOCATION. & PURPOSE OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED L'ASEMEHTS COMPLETE OUTLINE OF EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS APPLYIHG 'FO Pf~OPEkTY EXISTING ZONING AREAS SUBJECT TO FLOODING OR STORM WATER OVERFLOW:] WATER COURSES, MARSHES, WOODED AREAS, TREES 8" ~N DIAt41:~Ei~ ©k HORE ANY BUILDING WITHIN 100' OF PROPERTY PAVED ARE ' ~e . AS, SIDEWALKS, VEHICULAR ACCEoS TO PUBLIC EXISTING SEWERS, CULVERTS, WATERLINES WITIIIN OR ADJACENT P . . . SCREENING ROPOSED BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING AREAS OUTDOOR LIGHTING OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS OUTDOOR SIGNS 1239K SIDEWALKS LOCATIONS WIDTHS: SIZE OF WATER AND SEWER I,IHES ...... 150.00' NOTE: DO NOT SCALE DRAWING., f' = 30' .?~rl P =tORING No. 1 20 PATE. '. kg& I~, 19~ I _PIPIH& '~CH~HATIc D~Q~.^~ 4 , -4,41 t/~ / ,,~ ~./ //~ / / ~.~. , ~ ; . .il /~: / / .,,. :o f'~,r coHl~- I,,baN NOTES, ~->~* o, .,o-0. ,o - ~o.- o. PROPERTY INFORMATION Z-~" s,future ~ to b, m~ to SUFFOLK LONH~ T~X H~F N~H~E~ ~, .,.,,.. ~.-s.~;~,,..,~, II II tooo - Iz, - cz - fu ~licoIionI B' LIGHT ~I~E P~A CONG~E~CwloN DWICPIN6 AR~A: q, 000 s F. PLAN ~go~g~; 31~ L F EETMb ~ ~.,o.,-~ .,...,.,. PARKING CALCULATIONS GENERAL NOTES O" · ~ ~ · · r L ~b ~O~g To CoNF0~H To TIlE bATI;~I .. ~ · ~ RETAIL ~EL~ ~gO 5P~i~r~T,ONO AMD ' ' z. A;~tL~vArr~ A~ oN U.5c. )~ SECTION A-A DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS, . LEACHING BASIN DETAIL ~vs~ A ~ ~,~T ~,~o.~.~..,.o - ~soo~,~ . ,n. %~0 c,~ ~ SEPTIC ~ANK :.,~.o · '" DOLE' LAHp~ ~P/SBEm 5,77o5-p x .1~ ~ 580 q . Cmq = I~G, % ~ ' -- ' cgI~IA i - I ~-w~ J.~8 AC~E5 x 300 ~AL./DAy = ~l~ ~AL,/~Ay LANDS~AmE S~HEDULE -,-.----%: ~. LIGHTING 5~HEDULE ~ Sl~ ~VING MARK ~ANUF, ~ATR~Oe NO. P~SGRI~ION ~AMP G~ANT. TYR STANDA~D CONC. CU~B ~ STREET ~EPAIH ~ :'~*'* :~",~ ~,,.o-~,~ ! ~'~ ,4~u.~:~ :~ ~.,~.,,,, % ~ LEGEND ~ THE SHOPPES AT SOUTHOLD ~c ~o~ o~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~R MIDGE ROAD ASSOCIATES ~, ~. oF c~z* ~. GtC rAML~K AS~CIATES ~OM 34 ~~l- - ~" ~" ,,~ GREAT NECK, ~W'YORK ' 11021 ..~ ,. ARCHITECTS PLANNERS I,""~ ~ , ~A~ . /~1j 4.1.8Bp~g 6c~,H,~. ~rawn ~ KEY MAP ~'~" ~"~"" ~ proj.n( 'f 'SITE-'PLAN'~ ~ -------~"~ ' --~C , \,"V -- . ............ ' _ ~<r-.,~ .. SITE-'PLAN'~ ' ~ ' % ~ ~ ----// ~' --, .- : . - ; ~ .......... ~ ' ' ~l % X ~X // b ~ ' -- ,,~m ~..~=~, ,, I ~ I ~ ' ' '- '?: .-- -;,.';: :: -' .. : · . ,, . , :" ":' .-: .' . . '. . ~ fll~ ~'.-'- ., ~,, ~*~,~-*,"=zn' drawn -- ,~ ~ JJ I. .. ~'-It ...... / , Jlproj.~ ~,~ FF..Q;H PLt6K U.I~WIJ.,. PAWN ,~ cA LF_ ' sheet ~ of '~ / 7 f / ,. '~,~I f,r .~ ,' / I I I ~ ~ / ~/ "-~'1 I~"~ ~ I Z~.,.'.,-.'~'t~'/, ,' / :: ~>-~,~,~.,,~, ~/ / ..~.,.~..~ .E ~ I~-'~'~' ~ II l . , I/: ' ~.L) ~ /~ ~ i~''~ ~/ / ~'~;~-~ :~ I ~ I . ' SANITARy LEACHING POOL~ ' / ~'* '~ ~'" ' '""" ~ " [502 A PLAN SECTION A-A I~OTE; DO NOT SCALE DRAWart, ~uqF CoHflZob Fo, aH ' 1 BO;dNG No, ~ 2O 35 8' PlA .t BUMPER CUrB TYP. STANDARD CONC. CURB KEY MAP PROPERTY INFORMATION PARKING CALCULATIONS ,~DccIJ FAN~ ¥ GENERAL' NOTES AbL~L~VA~ON5 A¢.~ C,N lj 5C i ~ 5 DATuH ( DRAINAGE cALCULATIONS A5 PH,~LT ~?HALT , ~ ' I'~)LI$ TRt AL STANDARD STREET REPAIR LEGEND TC LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE ._ COVlidON N,&NE ~IZ~- , QL[ AN q- 5 B'-q' H'T l io MANUF, LIGHTING SCHEDULE (~AN% ~4 CATAL0 6 HO THE SHOPPES AT MATTITUCK FOR MIDDLE ROAD ASSOCIATES CIO AMLOCK ASSOCIATES 426 NORTHERN BLVD., ROOM 34 GREAT NECK, 'NEW YORK 11021 S-1 sheet I of I ~ I 6 1990 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS SMITHTOWN(SI6j724 1191 P©RIJEFFERS©N 51A '_,1~ 331 9555 "~'~ ' "~ ..... '~ at I1'¢, 8~ ' e /V23° 56*/0"£ Z2° /:. 1'-30' 4 PERMIT REQUIh£D PURsuANT TO SECT. 136 OF THE HWy. LAW. FOR ANY IMPROVEMENT~ THIS DEPARTMENT DEEMs ALONG THE ~s~,~k,.,... ~CE~SARy .OTIS, PROPERTY INFORMATION ~ .-. iT~H AH~ PLAN FRee,GE: 3,~ L F RETAI~ ~OR~ PA~KING OALOULATIONS GENENAL NO, ES · , ]~ · , ~ I. A~ ~O~K TO CONFO~H To TH~ bAT~1 P~ANNI~ · · s '. -- ca~ll~B,,pipe ml~t~ ~I~= '~m 24"G~n~ DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SECTION A-A LEACHING BASIN BETA ~ ~r~ ~0~/~ %6~o,.~ · .m - ,,~,.~.- . n. z,~.~ ~,~ ~P~ ~D/SGE~ 5,77o~.F x,lq DOME' S' , -' ~TAC I:o~z Cp+ zeq.o C.F ' ~ ~- ~. ,, ~.~ SANITARY CALCULATIONS , ~ - C~l~l A .~. *U.dlnSuN~C~y ~00 GAL /Dhy ~ ' ~ TOTAL: 810,S6 GPp. ~ 8110p, p ..... , ~L~ ~ K-o"~ ~ <-~" .T. LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE ---'/~;-'""~ '~'X~ ', ~ ~ ~.~ co~.~.~.~ co~.n.~ ~ ~ z~" s" ~... ~,, :., ~:.' /' ~; -~-- ~ LIGHTING SCHEDULE BUMPER C~B I TYR STANDARD CONC. CURB LEGEND THE ~~ ~>~T~[ , s~v o~o~ 426 ~RTH~N BLVD., ~OM 34 ~z,~,~7 ~~~ ~~. ,"'~ ~ A~::~ GREAT NECK, NEW ~RK 11'021 sheet ~of I '" ~ KEY MAP 7 (2' ' 3 o~,~L-~, b/~t, IL,C` ,--cJ VL: N~l'd~7 pJ~LL c..dF.,~.l,d & L L ~r-I dT-_ 4" '-%TA. L -I 4) Jbl. I 5 Ige8 LOe~.?ZOW l.lvz D~ ~ 12. sheet i of .;~ t-, K&:~ ~- L I-VA, Fi 0 NJ '1 L~TT ~ IL.~b II sheet Z of ARCHITECTS PLANNERS dateI II~roj,~-,'~ X LL-6 Q I, / SITE PLAN 1" = 30' , .OTES, PROPERTY INFORMATION f~ ~,~. lOGO , - o~ - ~ B-LIgHT ~W51~ ~.~ ."~.,=~ ,.,,,. ~. ~ , ~ ~~ - ~' ~' PARKING CALCULATIONSjJ GENE~L NOTES '~: SECTION A-A ! DRAINAGE CALCULAT~NS I LEACHING BASIN DETAIL · ~ON SI~ II SANITARY CA ULATIONS  Cg~KIA TYR STA C. ,CURB 8 STREET REPAIR LEGEND L~C HING ~oL KEY MAP ~,ANITA&y FLON P~516N BZ~, %?.O, HAx. x .z mAY5 = LEACJH Naa 6-o"~ . ~;o" Hr. LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE HARK ~OT-ANICAL NAHE CO~HON NAN~ 5 Kbs' lANT C. I~A ~,~,p Pb ~, ~lZ£ OUAHT. LIGHTING SCHEDULE HANIIF. CATAL0 ~ NO. P EBC.RIPTI ON L-AHP QUANT. THE SH'OPPES AT SOUTMOLD sheet I of I :;/~ MIDDLE FIO.A~. AS~C)GIATE$ AMLO(~K A~SaeOIATES ,4~1 NOR~ BLVD,, ROOM 34 GREAI'INECK,'NEw YC~RK 11021 scale dateI liB', JJproj.naJ · ~s, / WATER , SANITARY LEACHING Z ~., 6ANI-r&J~' A/£ C/~ ,~oAD (sO') PlCfl? CoJ, ITIZo t i" -,30' BO;lING Ne. t lO T~H~ OF IN~TION, D, ~M~ THA~ ~IHA~IoN, · PW~T~ H~ ~HT HAG PUHP Fbb'f r',Pg / IT&R iOL' HA"F~ ~u?r~Y N~LL p~I'AI b TIGHT r NOTES~ PLAN PROPERTY INFORMATION ~UFFOI-K LOUMI'Y 'rAx H~P NIIHFSI~I~ DLS"rRtCT'- ~,.'/'ION- J~LOCK- L. OT ~;tCt PA'T'A I~eM b. LI6HT CONG'FR~IC.'T Io N ..~......,. ~., ~, ~ / "'_%~. PARKING CALCULATIONS , J L- 1 . RETAIL S~CTION A-A J DRAINAGE CALCULAT~NS LEACHING BASIN DETAIL ................. ON SI~ D~ME~ 8' DIA. TYE STAN;;~; ~t~lC. CURB I~ STREET,REPAIR LEGEND KEY MAP ~,Y6T~M e_ ?~V~HPNf A'5 PHAJ~' GENERAL NOTES WoP. KID C-ONFO~H To "rile bAT~.~I PLANNI~ 5p~ICI~T~ON~ A~D A~ ~VAfi~ A~ ON W.5.C, iq 5 D4TUH 2B DAY G~GN~H ~ AND TG~PHOMG ~RVlC¢5 ~0 CONTK~ HUST COH~Y Ni~fl ~PPROV~ £ RITEI(.I A 300 ~^g,/p~,¥ PEP- ~,E £ANITAJLY F~oN I~DSlGN 5tMI- Idtl' z-ToRE 5 :STOt~.A~E pRY ,4,11.0 &.P.D. MAX. L,9--ACH I N % %7tj, + Z6.O ~.F/v.t-.F. 10.96 V.L.E C~'~ ~PHAN~r ~PH ~'T SANITARY CALCULATIONS :~AW t'r/,KY KITe, HeN ToTAL Z,300~.¢- .04 G.P.D.,~ ~Z.O0 N.A. 72.00 5,0?.5 ~.F ~ ,03 G.RD. J~O '*/5 ~,A, [50,15 TOTAg : 410.36 { J~,Z ~Ab. .', USE (I} ~00 GAl-. ]~M[. ~tPl'l¢ "rANK 8'0'~ ~ 4:o" MT. .'. USt I,Z~OV.b.F. } (.Z) J~'¢ b.p. LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE 15o'r'A NIc ~,b NAHE j'IA~,, l. IG R~PIANT CoHNoN NANE Co~L4MNA~ R.~I> HAF~¢ ~lZ£ Hr. z'-Z ¥~'" 38 45 LIGHTING SCHEDULE !D P-.SCP.,I PTI ON L AM P AT $'1 MAY 20 1981 sheet I of : ARCHITECTS PLANNERS SMiTHTOWN (5161 724-7191 / PORT JEFFERSON STA (51~) 331-8S55 drawn K:,Lv. J , ~oa~. I ~"' ~0'/ date J II ~'. / llProj.~ ~ 5,77oS. F'x.l'l~ ~8o,q x JIq ' ToT,~. 1,8'/£, ~ c F ~ £01 .o NIP-DIAN / 2. sheet 2. of z oKt I , bJAy ' , r r CONC. I1'~ ,~:q '>..~ ~ :.-,, :,,PROPERTY,ii SECTION LEACHING ·SEPTIC ' ' ' ' ' '" nnur' 150/ ERA L_L- 3,~.,, .~, ~T~l L : ": '!?PARKING CALCULATION OTES 6T o,F--~/xE -kEY ~,, .: '. ' '~ ' ' ~ ~;' L ~ . LIGHTING SCHEDULE ' :, -', I , .: ~. .I ~ ~ HARK HANUF, CATA~06 N p~5~Z~lON LAMP ': , . BUMPER C~B . .. j LEGEF KEY MAP ,W~ - ,', . -- , NET 6TORE 5 ' ': LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE QHAN'I'. "10 ~4. H.ES. "THE,,~ SHOPPES AT $OUTHOLb" ~OR MIDDLE ROAD ASSOCIATES' ,' ,: ~/0 AMLOCK-: "ASSOCIATES'. : '-. ,.." -~26 NORTHERN BLVD.i ROOM 34- :' ~REAT NECK,'NEW YORK ' i10'21 ' -' . , sheet .1 of ARCHITECTS PLANNERS ' SMITHTOWN (5161 724-7191 / PORT JEFFERSON STA. {516) 331 B555 Ill · ~cA LF_ r sheet ~ of ; AROHIT~CT$ PkA~NER$ L. proj.n(