HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-120.-3-11.2t, t
d
q:
ToWN OF sOUTHOLD
- zO,~O. ;,I
PLANNINO BOARD MEMBERS
Richard G. Ward, Chairman
George Rltchle Latham, Jr.
Bennett Orlowsld, Jr.
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516} 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OIO'ICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARPdS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. ~ox 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516] 765 - 1823
October 5, 1993
Edward Harbes, Jr.
P.O. Box 247
Sound Ave.
Mattituck, NY 11952
Re:
Proposed lot line change
for Harbes Farm
s/s Sound Ave., Mattituck
SCTM~ 1000-120-3-11.2, 11.3,
11.4, 11.5 & 11.6
Dear Mr. Harbes:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town
Planning Board at a meeting held on October 4, 1993:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize
the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated May 21, 1993,
together with the set of maps dated February 12, 1993 showing
each stage of the individual lot line changes. Conditional final
approval was granted on May 24, 1993. All conditions of
approval have been fulfilled.
Enclosed please find a copy of the map which was endorsed by the
Chairman.
Please contact this office if you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
Richard G. Ward ~5
Chairman
enc.
cc:
Tax Assessors
Building Department
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
May 25, 1993
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P,O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Edward Harbes, Jr.
P.O. Box 247
Sound Ave.
Mattituck, NY 11952
Re:
Proposed Lot Line Change
for Harbes Farm
s/s Sound Ave., Mattituck
SCTM~ ~~120~3-I1,2~ ~t.3, 11.4,
11.5 & 11.6
Dear Mr. Harbes;
The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town
Planning Board on Monday, May 24, 1993:
The final public hearing which was held at 7:35 P.M. was closed.
The final resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Edward Harbes, Jr. is the owner of the property known
and designated as SCTM# 1000-120-3-11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5 &
11.6, located on the south side of Sound Ave. and the west side
of Aldrich Lane in Mattituck; and
WHEREAS, these lot line applications consist of 4 lot line
applications which are being processed concurrently and are to
be known as Harbes Farm; and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the
State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617,
declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on
May 3, 1993; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of
the Town of Southold have been met; and be it therefore,
Page 2
Harbes Farm
May 25, 1993
RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant
conditional final approval to the surveys dated May 21, 1993,
together with the set of maps dated February 12, 1993 showing
each stage of the individual lot line changes, and authorize the
Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to fulfillment of
the following Condition within six (6) months of the date of
this resolution:
1. Submission of the revised deed for each of the five parcels.
Please contact this office if you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
THIS LOT LINE CHAN~E BETWEEN AND
IS LOCATED ON
IN SCTM# 1000- ~o - ~~~.:~, )).~, ~L~, I~.£.
LOT LINE CHANGE
Complete application received
.
Applicatio~ reviewed at work session
Applicant advised of necessary revisions
Revised sub mission received
Lead Agency Coordination
SEQRA determination
Sent to County Planning dom mission
Review of SCPC report
Draft Covenants and Restrictions received
Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed
Filed Covenants and Restrictions received
Final Public Hearing
Approval of Lot Line -with conditions
Endorsement of Lot Line
ms 1/1/90
6-2 (2/8~)-- 7c
617.21
Appendix A
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
SEQR
~ Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent-
ly, there are aspects of a project Shat are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
· - Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified aspotentia y-arge, then Part3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: "~ Part 1 ~ Part 2 i-]Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 End 2 and 3 if appropr ate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
"~A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
[] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 ha~e been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
[] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared·
* A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of Lead Agency
Title of Re~)onsibJe Officer
esponsible Officer in Lead Agency
~5igna~iJ~re of Responsibl~ Agency
Date
1
Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer)
SOLh dOL3:
PART1--PROJECTINFOF qTION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe, ct
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additior~a!:
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. j
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such Additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance..
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County)
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR
ADDRESS
NAME OF OWNER (If different)
ADDRESS
BUSINESS TELEPHONB
STATE ZIP CODE
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
( )
CITY/PO
STATE ZIP CODB
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: F'IUrban Dlndustrial
r-]Forest ~lAgriculture
2. Total acreage of project area: ~'~" -~ acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural)
Forested
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.)
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL)
Water Surface Area
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill)
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces
Other (Indicate type)
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site?
a. Soil drainage: I-IWell drained ~'~" % of s. ite
~]Poorly drained . % of site
E3Commercial
E]Other
~Residential (suburban) E3Rural (non-farm)
PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
acres acres
acres _ acres
E3Moderately well drained --~ % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS[
Land Classification System? ~' -~ acres. (See I NYCRR 370). ~.
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~lYes [~No
a. What is depth to bedrock? /~' ~ (in feet)
2
-5. 'Approxunate percentage of propos.roject site with slopes: O0-10% O10-15%
%
O15',/* or greater . %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? OYes J~No
C7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of Nat nrta Natural Landmarks~ I'"lYes .~No
.
8. What is the depth of the water table? .~ (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [~Yes ONo
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? OYes ~No
11. Does project site contain any species qf plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
I~Yes l~No According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
E3Yes [~No Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the communit~ or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
OYes lC]No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views-known to be important to the community?
I~Yes [~No
15,. Streams within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name /}"o/Y'~_ b. Size (In acres)
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? []]'Yes 0-INn
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~Yes [-1No
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? I-lYes ,~No
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? OYes [~]No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 J~Yes I-1No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I~Yes ~No
B. Project Description
" 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimer~sions as appropriate}
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor _ ~'~"-~ acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: o acres initially; acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped ~"~,'~ acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: ~/~ appropriate)
e. If the project is .~n expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed .
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~' ,~, ; proposed
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour /~ ~, (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially /~/,
C Ultimately n4
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest propased structure /J/, 4, height; width; length.
i. Linear feet af frantage alonga public thoroughfare proiect will occupy is? ~/~, ft.
3
2. How much natural mat~' I{i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed m the site? O
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? E}Yes E:]No J~]N/A
a. If yes, for what intends,5 purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Wil} topsoil be stockpiled for rec amation? F-lYes r-lNo
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [:]Yes E]No
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? o acres:_
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this projecti
I~Yes ,~No '
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction ~/, ,~,
7. If multi-phased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated /~', .~' (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1
c. Approximate completion date of final phase
d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases?
8. Will blasting occur during construction? I--lYes ~'No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project- /~' /~. .
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
months, (including demolition).
tons/cubic',~ards
. month year, (including demolition).
month year.
[:3Yes [:]No
; after project is complete
E]Yes ~]No If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [:]Yes ~i'lNo
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? I-lYes ,~No Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? E]Yes
16. Will the project generate solid waste? [:}Yes ,~]No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I-lYes [:]No
c. If yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
e. If Yes, explain
I-3Yes I-1No
,l~No
[:]Yes
~No
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste?
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal?
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life?
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~Yes
[:]Yes I~No
tons/month.
years.
[qNo
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [:]Yes
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels?
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [:]Yes ,~No
If yes , indicate type(s)
~No
I'-lYes
~No
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ,~oO ~/~/}~gal.lons/minute
23. Total anticipated water usage per day -~'/,
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? I-IYes ~No
If Yes, explain
25. Approvals Required:
City, Town, Village Board ~]Yes I~No
City, Town, Village Planning Board ~lyes DNo
City, Town Zoning Board I-lYes ~]No
City, County Health Department l-lYes l~No
Other Local Agencies DYes
Other Regional Agencies I-lyes
State Agencies E]Yes ~]No
Federal Agencies I-lYes J~jNo
C. Zoning and Planning Information
Submittal
Date
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? I--lYes ~No
· If Yes, indicate decision required:
[~]zoning amendment l-lzoning variance I-lspeciaJ use permit J~]subdivision [~]site plan
~lnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan r-lother
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? J~'A~I~-O~'LI~tZ - /f?l~_~,,i~£~,'7~L,
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site?
S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
C
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~Yes r~No
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~/~ mile radius of proposed action?
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/~ mile? []Yes
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? /~/o /J/~'j/~/ LoT"~
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? /~" ~,
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I-lYes
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? r~Yes J~No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? r~Yes DNo
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? I-lYes ,~No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? E]Yes [qNo
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor, Name ~. ~,.~/~)i~,~/~',J~) /Z//~/~/~ .~, ~/¢/~. Date
If the action is Jn the Coastal Area, and you are a slate agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
wilh this assessment.
§
-" Part 2OR(.i--'CT ;MPACTS AND THEIF~AC -;TUDE
Responsibility o1' Lead Agency
General Information (Read Carefully)
· In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations be
reasonable? The rewewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
· Identifying that an ~mpact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significan
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simrr
asks that itbe looked at further.
· The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropria
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
· The impacts of each prolect, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative a~
have been offered as guidance, They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each questic
· The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
· In identifying impacts· consider long term, short t~rm' and cumlative effects.
Instruclions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers'.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but thresh•
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to modera
impact· also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. Th
must be explained in Part 3.
IMPACT ON LAND
1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change tq~th_~ project site?
Examples that would apply to column 2 /~O OYES
· Any construction on slopes of 1.5% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
· Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than
3 feet.
· Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles.
· Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within
3 feet of existing ground surface.
· Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more
than one phase or stage.
· Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000
tons of natural material (i.e. rock or soil) per year.
· Constructron or expansion of a sanitary landfill.
· Construction rna designated floodway.
· Other impact~
Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land ~Lo_r~.ms found on
the site? lie cliffs, dunes, geological formatons, etc.~'NO OYES
Specific land forms:
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [ I--lYes l-IN•
[] O []Yes I-)No
[] [] ['lYes •No
[] [] ['lYes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] l-lYes ON•
[] [] []Yes ON•
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
IMPACT ON WATER
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected?
(Under Articles 15, 24, 25 Of the Environmental Conser a~_ 'on Law, ECL
OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Developable area of site contains a protected water body.
: Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a
protected stream.
· Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body·
· Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland.
· Other impacts:
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing Or new body
of water? L-]NO I-lYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
· Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
· Other impacts:
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? '~NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will require a discharge permit.
· Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
· Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45
gallons per minute pumpin§ capacity.
· Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water
supply system.
· Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater.
, · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
· Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gal[ohs per
day.
· Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an
existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
· Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical
products greater than 1,100 ga[Eons.
· Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water
and/or sewer services.
· Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or stoiage
facilities.
· Other impacts:__
6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patt~c~r surface
· water runoff? F1YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would change flood water flows.
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] I~Yes F]No
[] [] OYes F~NO
[] [] OYes r-INo
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes F-INo
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes FINo
[] [] I--lyes []No -
[] [] E3¥es []No
[] [] FIYes []No
[] [] I-lyes []No
[] [] E]ves E]No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes EE]No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] : []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes
· Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
· Proposed Ac.tion is incompatible with existing drainage patterns.
· Proposed Action will allow developmen, t in a designated floodway.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? '~O i-lyES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given
hour.
· Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of
refuse per hour.
· Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed
to industrial use.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial
development within existing industrial areas.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON' PLAN=rS AND ANIMALS
8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or enda~
species? I-lyES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site'.
· Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat.
· Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other
than for agricultural purposes.
· Other impacts:
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? ~10 J-lYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
· Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres
of mature forest (over 1[)0 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation,
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land es?
Examples that wo'uld apply to column 2 ~(~ r-lYES
· The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
I 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] E]Yes [--INo
[] [] I-'] Yes
[] [] OYes ONo
[] [] E]Yes r-INo
[] O I--lYes I--INo
[] [] ~]Yes r-INo
[] [] I--lyes ~]No
[] I--I I--lyes I--INo
[] [] ~]Yes r-INo
[] [] E]Yes i-]No
[] [] I-lYes E]No
[] [] I-lYes [-]No
[] [] I--lYes I-]No
[] [] I--lYes i']No
[] [] E]Yes E]No
[] [] I--lYes E]No
[] [] E3Yes I-]No
· Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of
agricultural land.
· The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more
· than 2.5 acres of agricultural land.
· The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES,?
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? j~O I~YES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in ~ec~tion 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
· Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
· Project components that will result in the elimination or significant
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance.~ ~l~O I-lYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action occurrinl[ wholly or partially within or substantially
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
o~ historic places. ~
· Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the
project site.
· Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
· Other impacts:_
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality oi: existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities? ,, ,,
Examples that would apply to column 2 XNO r~yES
· The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity.
· A major reduction of an open space important to the community.
· Other impacts:
~F--; 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact B~
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact~ Project Ch'ang~
[] [] fi-lYes r-INo
[] [] I--lYes f-INo
[] [] I-'lYes ~]No
r~- [] I-lyes I--]No
[] [] nyes r-lNo
[] [] F"lYes i--INo
[] [] : I-lYes E]No
[] [] - I-lYes E]No
[] [] I-lyes E]No
[] [] I-lYes
[] [] E]Yes E3No
[] [] i-lYes E3No
[] [] E3Yes E3N0
[] [] E]Yes E3No
[] [] E3Yes nNo
9
" IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation s~m(~? tqYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods.
· Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply? ~NO ~IyES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase [n the use of
any form of energy in the municipality.
· Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
· Other impacts:
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibr ia~ as a result
of the Proposed Action? /L~NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility.
· Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day).
· Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
· Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe.~NO E3YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level
discharge or emission.
· Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
· Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural
gas or other flammable liquids.
· Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance
within'2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste,
· Other impacts:
~r 2 3
Small to Potentia Can Impact Be
Moderate Large , Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] !' I-lYes I'-I N o
[] [] [~]Yes J--J No
[] [] []Yes •No
[] [] E:]Yes J--lNo
[] [] []Yes [--INo
[] [] !: []Yes []No
[] [] I-lYes l--INo
[] [] [:]Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] I=]Yes [qNo
[] []' []Yes ['-JNo
[] [] J~]Yes J--INo
[] [] ['-JYes []No
[] [] [:]Yes []No
[] [] [--] Yes []NO
[] [] []Yes J~]No
10
" IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD
18 Will proposed action affect the character Of the existing community?
Examples that would apply to column 2 ~O []y~'~;
· The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the
project is located is Iii<ely to grow by more than .5%.
: The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project.
· Proposed action will conflict with offici~alJy adopted plans or goals.
· Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use.
· Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures
or areas of historic importance to the community.
· Development will create a demand for additional community services
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · '
· Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects.
· Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment.
· Other impacts:_
I 1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact
Moderate Large. Mitigated E
Impact Impact Project Char
[] [] E]Yes ["Ih
[] [] E~Yes
[] [] E]Yes L'-]N
[] [] I-] Yes
[] [] I-'lyes
[] [] I--lYes
[] [] E]Yes E]N,
[] [] r-lyes
[] [] ! E]Yes
19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts? ~NO ~IYES
If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large ImpaCt or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3'-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMpAcTs
Responsibility of Lead Agency ~.
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be
mitigated.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1. Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
· The probability of the impact occurring
· The duration of the impact
· Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
· Whether the ~mpact can or will be controlled
· The regional consequence of the impact
· Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
· Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact
(Continue on attachments)
11
14-;I 6-2 (2/g7)-- 7c
617.21 SEQR
Appendix A
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent-
ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part2 is identified aspotentia y-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 []Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I ~nd 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
r-1 A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
[] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
[] C, The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
* A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
4
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Title of Responsible Officer
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Date
Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer)
iU ~ I 8 1993
PART 1--PROJECT INFO, ,vlATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered.~
as part of the apphcat'on for approval and may be subject to further verfficat on and pub ¢ rev ew. Prov de any add/t/Dna ~.
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and wilt not involve
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such ~dditional work is unavailaiJle, so indicate and specify
each instance.
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County)
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
ADDRESS
STATE / ZIP CODE
NAME OF OWNER (If different) BUSIN EP O
ADDRESS
CITY/PO
STATE ZiP CODE
OESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description.
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: l-lUrban Fqlndustrial 1"3Commercial
F1Forest ~Agriculture [:]Other
2. lotal acreage of project area: ~" ~ acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) ~ acres acres
Forested O acres acres
Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) ~'~', acres acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) o acres acres
Water Surface Area O acres acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) D acres acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces O acres acres
Other (Indicate type) OffS. ~t.,l) t~a~h.'' ,.~ acres acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site?
a. Soil drainage: E3Well drained ~ro~' % of site
~lPoorly drained % of site
[:]Residential (suburban) rqRural (non-farm)
E3Moderately well drained ~ % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYSt
Land Classification System? ~', -~ acres. (See I NYCRR 370). ~-
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? r~Yes ~No
a. What is depth to bedrock? /q/' t~ ~ (in feet)
2
5. 'Approximate percentage of proposed p~l~ct site with slopes: F10-10% [10-15% %
[[]15% or greater . %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? E3Yes ]~'No
~7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of Nat onal Natural Landmarks? [Yes J~]No
8. What is the depth of the water table? ~ (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? {~Yes []No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? []Yes ~No
11. Does project site contain any species qf plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
I-lYes ~No According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
[-3Yes ~]No Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
[~]No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views-known to be important to the community?
I~Yes ~No
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name ~//o/~ b. Size (In acres)
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~Yes []No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~Yes ~lNo
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [Yes
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? [Yes [;~No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes ~lNo
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [~Yes ~No
C
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimer~sions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor ..
b. Project acreage to be developed: 0 acres initially;
c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped ~'~"-~ acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: ' ,~ appropnate)
e. If the project is a,n expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed ~/}'¢0/~o %;
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~' /~0 ; proposed
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour /~, /~, (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family
Initially /y, ,,~0
Ultimately ~
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure /J/, J. height; _ width;
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?
acres ultimately.
Condominium
length.
ft.
2. How much natural ma~ .al (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removeo ,rom the site? O tons/cubic yards
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? r-]Yes E]No JtqN/A
a. If yes, for what intend~J purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled [or reclamation? I-lYes I-1No
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes I~No
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? o acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
[]Yes ~qNo
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction ~ ~, months, {including demolition).
7. If multi-phased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated //}/, ./~' (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I month
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month
d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? []Yes [:]No
8. Will blasting occur during construction? [:]Yes I~No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 1///' ~- ; after project is complete
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project-
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [:]Yes 0(INo If yes, explain
year, (including demolition).
year.
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? []Yes J~No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? []Yes ,J~No Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [:]Yes
16. Will the project generate solid waste? [3Yes ~]No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? fqYes []No
c. If yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
e. If Yes, explain
[]Yes [~No
l~No
[]Yes
[-JNo
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste?
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal?
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life?
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~Yes
l-lYes I~No
tons/month.
years.
[]No
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? []Yes [~l'No
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? []Yes
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? []Yes ,~No
If yes , indicate type(s)
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ..~o~ ~/l~i/~gal.lons/minute'
23. Total anticipated water usage per day ,~9
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? []Yes ~No
If Yes, explain
[~No
4
25. Approvals Required:
City, Town, Village Board DYes ~No
City, Town, Village Planning Board ~lYes I-INo
City, Town Zoning Board DYes
City, County Health Department I-lYes I~No
Other Local Agencies J-lyes J~No
Other Regional Agencies f-lYes ~No
State Agencies I--lYes ~]No
Federal Agencies D-lYes [~No
C. Zoning and Planning Information
Submittal
Type Date
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? I~Yes ~No
· If Yes, indicate decision required:
I~zoning amendment I-Izoning variance [~special use permit I-Isubdivision E]site plan
l-lnew/revision of master plan I-Iresource management plan f-lother
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? ~,~ 1~/-'7'L/~
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site?
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
C
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~]Yes r~No
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action?
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? l~iIYes [:]No
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? ~/o N~../ LeT"'~
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed?
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? F'lYes ~No
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? E3Yes [~No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? I-lYes E3No
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~lYes ~]No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? r-lYes r~No
D. Informational Details
Attach any additionM information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
ApplicanttSponso~ Name L EDI~ RD --/.//JR/3£5, rJ¢~. Date
"~"~/ .~,,~/- ._ ~ Title
Signature ~. ~'~r
I[ lhe action is in the Coaslal Area, an~ you are a slate agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form ~efore proceedin~
wil~ t~is assessment.
5
CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT--THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD Ill USED BY LAWYERS ONLY.
day Ol ~/~-~t-t?~ (~neteen hundred aud SiXty-SiX
EDWAP.9 W. HARBE$, SR~ and MARY M. HARBES, his wife, both
£es~din$ a~' (No number) Half-Hollow Road, Huntington, New York,
~'~]~ ~ o! ~ ~ p~, md EDWARD W. HAP. BES, J~., residing at (No number)
~ ~Vanderbil~: Parkway, Hun~inston, New York,
oI the ~o~md l~,tt' , ~,
............. ' ' '
'''''''''-------'-------- do,ars,
~ood' and'val~ble 'consideration
~ ~d ~, d~ k~ ~t ~ rg~ ~ '~e ~ of ~e s~nd ~, ~e heirs or
~'~ti~ck/T~ of Sou~hold,' ~ty of Suffolk, and
of N~ Yo~k~.bo~8~d ahd desc~bed as foil.s:
at a e~creee'~me see on =he noreherly side of North
~:'a~~he SOue~ese comer of the p<~ises herein
"lafid of'~dsal Real~y Co~, on She wese; ~ing
said land of ~dsal ~lcy Co~., NotCh 21' 12~ 30" Wes=,
~.~o land of Herber~ H. Reeve; ~nain~ thence alon8 said
of Herb~r=. N; Reeve, ~o_ courses, and distances as roll.s
36'[ 30'.' ~s~ 292.~4 feet; (2)South 22' 20' 00"
:he[n~rthe=ly, aide of North ~ad (~d Argue);
the northerly aide of North ~ad (Sold Avenue) South
.West' 302.59 fee=l thence South 83~ ~5~,30' Wes~ 8.~
to:,~he pO}hr'Or place 0f beginninS.
;PARCEL III ._ _
bein8 at:~t~i~uck, Sou~hold Tm, and a portion in Rive~ead T~,
~ffolk ~y and State oi,N~ York bonded and desc~bed as foll~s:
on th~ wes~erly!side of Aldxich ~ne ac ~he nor~h~sc :
co.er of =he pr~i'ses h~ein describ~d adJoinin~ land of Wesson on
=he[north; fr~ said'point of be~l~{n~, mniug alon~ the westerly
Side' of Ald~ch hue =he foiling six (6) courses and distances:
(1) Sou~ 18~ 53~ 50' East 550J3 [ee~; (2) South 22°
:206,05 fee=I_(3) ~uth.21°, ~' 20" Eas~, 16.93 feet;
55~, 20P ~sC 61.81 feeCl (5):South 21° 55~ 20" ~sc 28~.39 fee~;
~ucb 18~..15~ 20" ~s~ 680.88 fee~ to a ~n~c and land of.
; mnin~ ~h~ce alons said land 'of ~ckowski.~he foll~in~
~9._(2) courses and dis~ances'l (1) Sou~h ~8' 28~ 40" West 282.t0
feet; (2) ~uth ~9~, 31~ 00".~es~ 2~9.81 feet co a mon~
th~ce ~loni ~ndS of ~c~s~ and NedosyCko South 19' t3'~sC 659.71
fee~ ~o a concrete ~n~c[and land of ~y ~eve; tuning Chics
alon8 said land of by ~eve ~he ioll~in~ three (3) courses and
di~=ances:. (1) sm~h 617 14t~,10" West 641.59 fee~ ~o a
(2):-~u~h 68' 49~ 50" West[165.55 fee~ co a concrete
(3) South 20' 04' 20" East 820.19 feet to a concrete monument and
land nOw or formerly of Aldrich; running thence along said land now
ot formerly of Aldrich, South 73° 04' West, 159.96 feet to a concrete
monument and land of Harriet Fanning Estate; running thence along said'
lOwtn two (2) courses end
d of Harriet FannY_mS._Es.taste the fol g to a concrete mon.ume~t;
2) South 74' 18' West.=~=~-~_'_'_~:~o ..id laud of Edward
dward Sydlowski; running ~ne~u~ - .... o
North 19° 45' West 965.60 feet to a concrete monUment; thence along
lands of Edward SydlOwski and`Frank Fox, North 73° 14' East 539.30 fm
to a concrete monument; ~q~nning thence along said land .of Frank
N~rth 19° 45' West 54.55 feet to a point; running thence along land
of KuJawski, North 73° 31' East 340.47 feet to a concrete monument;
· 1 alon land of Ku]awski, North 19° 46'
running thence stil g' . .... nt on the southerly'
oncrece monument to - ~.i
1543.12 feet through a c . _ . .... ~-- southerly side of Sold
side of Sound Avenue, runnxng t_ distances as follows:
Avenue the follow_ins th.r.ee~ !3.)~.~o_u..rs,.e_s..a~Increte ,,onument; (2)
i! w~rth 83° 45' 30" East ].~-~.~ ~a~ ~ ~ ...... t' ~3~ North 88
~° 38' 20" East 368.98 feet to a concrete monu~=- ,
13' 5~'' ~"'' ~v °7 feet to a concrete monument and land of
~ ~°~ ""'" Wesson, the following two (2) ::'",ii:
running thence along eai..d.la, nd_.of,., ~,, ~0" East 250.00 feet to
-~urse~ sad distances: ~) ~ou~n, .~., ~.I,, ~"-.~ ~,n 28 feet
concrete monument, %~/' --~ . , ;.~
monument and place of beginning. '~:
PARCEL III:
ALL that 'e'er:aim lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying an
being at Mattituck, Town of South01d, County of Suffolk and
New York, bounded and described &s foll .ow t es about to be
.~.,~,~m .~ she northeast corner of the pram a. .. .__=~
amid oint being .the ZO~?.OWIng .unz~=eu~_~_~~ .... ,,,w forme~ 'Of
P - - ~ .... .~erlv line o: ~auu= ,,~- -- -~ "
intersection Or ~:uu o,.,,,,-,,
W. Harbes with the westerl~ side of Aldrich Lane, said point als~
the northeasterly corner of land now or formerly of Backowski;
1. South 78' 2g' ,,0" west 2 2. ,o feet;
~ Rat,th 79° 341 00" west 279.81 feet; ·
' ~g~g~ 19e 43' 00" east 659.71 feet; ·
rom' said oint of place of beginning;
f rurnninPg now or
and
~thence south· 20" 02' ~0" east along land
formerly of William Nedosztko 9&0.6~ feet;
thence still along said lands south 77? 50' &O" west
176,78 feet;
thence south 76° 31' lO" West 297.80 feet; .
thence South 77° 3~' 20" west 130;34 feet; .
thence along land now or £o~erly of William NedoszYtk°
and Joseph Cain south ?3° 0~ Wear 206.22 feet to other lands now
or formerly o£ Edward Wo
thence along said land the £ollm~lng courses and diatancas:
North 20° 0~~ 20" Wear 820.19 feet to a point;
thence north 68° 49~ 50" East 165.55 feet;
thence North 67~ 14~ 10" east 641.59 feet to the · .
point or plash of beginning.
~s ~d ~ ~ ~e ~' o{ ~e ~ ~ forever.
Subjec~ to purchase money:mortgage intended to be recorded
St~ltaneously herewith,
AND the ~ of the first putt, in eorn~ll,-~ w/th Sec'don 13 o! the Lieu Law, co*enant~ that the part7 of
the first part wm tectqve the condderattoa for thh co~weyance and will hold the right to receive such cons{d-
eration ~ a trust fund to he applied first fo~ the purple of psych& the cost o! the hnprovement and will apply
the lame first to the payment o! the coat o! the Improvement before using any part of the total of the same
'~my other purpose, --- ,' ' - - ........... ~.~.. - ~' ~
The word "party" shell be construed I~ If It read "p~rt/es" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires,
IN ~ WHFJIEOF, the part7 of the first p~t ires duly executed this deed the day and year first above
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
On the r/~-' day. o~d''~-'~ ~'k~ 19 66-he[ore me
personally~.ame EDWARD W. IqARBES, SR.
HARY FI. HARBES)
to me known to be the ind[vidua! 8 described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument, ~,nd acknowledged t~.t
they executed the Same,
/
STATE OF NEW YORK° COUNTY OF
On thc day of 19 , he,ore me
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF u~
On the d~y o~ 19 , befor~ me
personally c~'ne
to me known to ~ the fndlvid~al described I~ nad who
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that
executed the same.
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF sJJ
On the (lay of 19 , ~{otc me
personally came personally c~me ,
to me Imown, who. being hy me duly sworn, did depose and the subscrlbmg witness to the foregoiug msttum~h with
say ti]at he resides at No. whom I am personally acquainted who being by me duly
; sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. ' ,
that he is the : ;
of , ~ - t ' lthat . h~Ws ' ~ :' '~ i ;~ ~
m an t wn ch execut~ t e [oregoing {nstrua ent; that he "" ':' , " ' ' to:~ t..e fnd.vtdua]
knows the seal of said co.ration that the s~l affxed ]re<rhed in and who executed the foregoing
to said instrument is such co.rate seal; that it was so ]that he, sad subscribing witness w~ present an~ saw
affixed by order of the Mard of directors of said corpora- 'execute the same and that he said
rio h and that he si~ed h nan e thereto by 1 ke order, at the s~e time subscr )ed h name aa witness thereto,
· - ,11,.~
RECORDED
DEc 2~ I96~;
NORMAN E. KLIPp
E~erk ~ Suffolk ~u~
1000 120 - 3 - 11.2
1000 - 120 - 3 - 11.3
1000 - 120 ~ 3 - 11.4
1000 - 120 3 - 11.5
1000 120 ~ $ 11.6
Pur--qEP_9~: To allow road access to five existing parcels that would
facilitate future estate dispersements.
Contact Edward Harbes IH at 298-4010 or 298-9773
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT
To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold:
The undersigoed applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final)approval of a subdivision plat in
accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and tbe Rnles and Regulations of the Southohl Town
Planoing Board, and represents and states as follows:
1. The applicant is the Owner of record of the laud under application. (If the applicant is not the
OWner of record of the land nnder application, the applicant shall state his interest in said
land under application.)
' 2. The name of the ~¢'~OM~C
3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed
suggested.)
4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office a~
follows:
~,~r ...... ~. · ......
......... o~ .~. /
s. ,~ a~ o* ~ ~n0 ~ ..... ~,~ .... · ....
...... acres.
6. Ail taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except .
........................................................ ,. .............................
mortgage (s) as follows: ·
(a) Mortg~d~ in L~ber .............. PaKe ............. . .
of $ .............. ~mo _ ~ m original amotmt
............. ~ ......... ~..~o.r... ~pp/~.e~ % ..............
$ ...................... held ........
.............. - .... v. ~ ........... held by ......................
................ address ............... ~ ...................
8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except . ~. 0/~'..~. ..........
10. X'o part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex-
l 1. The applicant shall at his expense install all required publlc improvements.
~2. The hnd (does)~ ne in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis-
trict, if within a District, is
13. Water mains will be lald by ....
and (a) (no) ~harge will be made for installing said mains.
Town of Southold Highxvay system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same.
18. There are no ex/sting buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown
19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensiois of streets on adjoinin
division maps heretofore filed, there are m sub-
ex~stm~ maps at the r con unc' ' reserve strips at the end of the tr g
J tmns xwth the proposed streets .~ n~/a[eefs~on said
20. In the COUrse of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec.
335 of the Real Property Law.
21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lo~s showing all restrictions, covenants,
etc. Annex
22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading' anti required public improvements will be
$ .......... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the
Performance Bond be fixed at .......
....... years. The Performance Bond will be written by
a licensed surety company nnless otherwise shown on Schedule "F".
(Name of Applicant)
...
(Address) ~V //e~
county OF ...... .......
On the .... )~.~... day o~..'... 2~ & , 19~ ,
................... ' own to be the iudividual described in and who
ex~cuted the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ...~. .... executed the same.
mary Publi~. ~)~'C~ ..............
N~a~ ~hc, St~ ~ N~ ~
No. ~79~
Qualifi~ in Surfak ~u~ ~
On the ................ day ...... of
.................... , 19 ...... , before me personally came
......................... to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de-
pose and say that ............ resides at No .....................................................
................................ that .......................... is the ..........
the corporatiou described in and ................
which executed the foregoing iostrnment; that ............ knoxvs
the seal t*f said corporation; that the seal affixed by orr er of the board of directors of said corporation.
and that ............ signed .............. name thereto by like order.
Notary Public ' .....................
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Gentlemen:
Re:
The followin~ statements are offered for your Consideration
in the review of the above_~entioned minor subdivision and its
referral Go the Suffolk County Planning Commission:
~) / No grading, othe~ than foundation excavation for a
residential building is proposed
No ne%~ roads'are proposed and no changes %~ill be made in
the grades of the e×isting roads.
No new drainage s~ruc~ures or alzeration of existing
structures are proposed.
Yours truly,
$outhold. N.Y. 11971
(516) 705-1938
~ - .... ~LANNING BOARD
Please COmplete, sign and return to the Office o . ·
Board with your Completed .. . f
to any of the fol~ .... apPllcatlons fo~o ~= the Planning
these on your ~ua;~ng~questions is yes -~2 ~.your answer
evidence~ ~ ~ee~ SUrvey or s,,~ ~ase indicate ..
~'"~u O~ner appropriate
1. Are ·there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes ~No ~/
(Attached is a list-o.f the wetland grasses defined
by the ~wn Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) ~/
2. Are there any other premises under your o~';nership
abutting this parcel?
Yes ~
3. Are there any building permits pending on
this parcel?
· Yes ~
4. Are. there any other applications pending
concerning this property before any other
department or agency?(Town State, County, etc.) Yes .
5. Is there any application pending before
any other agency with regard to a different
project on this parcel?
6. Was this property the subject of any prior Yes ~ N~
application to the Planning BOard?
7. Does this property have a valid ' Yes ~
of occupancy, if yes please submit a Certificat~
Copy of Same Yes' '. ~
~~-~//'4~ ~//~ A_ / , ., n. : ·
Xgnauure. of pko~ert~ ~ .....
· ..... ,~. -''~or~:ed ~g~n~ ------~--~
Attachment to questionnaire for/the Planning Board
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTy OF SUFFOLK, ss: '
~m~h~~~a~ ~ ~, 19~, before me personall
· --~S J/~ to me kno~n to be the
individual described in'and who executed the foregoing in'strun
and acknowledged that --~_exec~r~d ~he Same
Ou~l/fi~j in S~ffo~k Cou
14-16-4 (2/87)--Te~t 12
ROJECT LD. NUMSER
617.21
Appendix C
State Environmental Quality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
SEQR
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
PART I~PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor)
1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR
4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc. or provde map)
5. IS PROPOSED ACTION:
[]E.pa.sio. "o",'lca,,on,ai,er.,,on
6. DESCRiBEPROJECT~RiEFLY: T~
/~LLov~/ ~0~ ~~ ~0
7. AMOUNT OF AFFE~ED:
Initially ~ acres
U~tlmately acres
8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH ~ISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING ~ND USE RESTRICTIONS?
~ NO ~f No, describe briefly
9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT?
~ Residential [] Industria~
Describe:
[] Commercial ~ Agriculture
~lParklForest/Open space []Other
10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW O~ ULTIMATELY PROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL,
STATE OR LOCAL)?
[] Yes [~No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals
ll. DOES ANy ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL?
[] Yes ~ NO If yes, gst agency name and permit/approval
12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERM T/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODI
[] Yes ~ NO FICAT ON?
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ASOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
--~he action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete
Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment the
OVER
1
=ART II--ENVIR~ (To be completed by Agenc
A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY T~E I THRESHOLD iN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 If review process and use the FULL EAF.
[] Yes [] No
B. WiLL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If No, a m~gative declaration
may be superseded by another involved agency.
[] Yes [] NO
C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING; (Answers may be handwritten, if legible)
C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, so,id waste production or disposal,
potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly:
C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly:
C3/~/egetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wddlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly:
C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change In use or intensity of use of [and or other natural resources? Explain briefly
C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly.
C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or otber effects not identified in Cl-C57 Explai~ briefly.
C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly.
D. IS THERE. OR iS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS?
[] Yes [] No If Yes, explain briefly
PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF S!GNIF_!CANCE (To be completed by Agency)
INSTRUCTIONS: For e~ch adverse effect identified above, determine whether It is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant.
Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d)
irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that
explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed.
[] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY
occu~ ~'hen proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration.
,r~ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting
documentation, that the proposed act[on WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts
AND provide on attachments as necessary, the'reasons supporting this determination:
Name of Lead A~enc¥
Oate
TitJe of Responsible Officer
Signature of Preparer ill different from responsible officer}
SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
SENDER:
SU~EC~:
sc~#: IZO-~-11-2, Il.3, Il.q,
1~6~ ,z~f-~ d~oad
September 27, 1993
Planning Board Office
Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Post Office Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re:
Proposed Lot Line Change
for Harbes Farm
s/s Sound Avenue, Mattituck
SCTM # 1000-120-3-11.2,11.3,11.4,11.5, & 11.6
Dear Planning Board Members:
In accordance with the resolution adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board
on May 24, 1993, a revised deed for each of the five parcels was filed a the Office of the
Clerk of Suffolk County on September 24, 1993 at 3:44 pm. Lots A through E are
identified in the survey for the Harbes Property dated May 21, 1993. These lots were given
the following new tax lot numbers:
Lot
New Tax Lot Number
A 11.8
B 11.9
C 11.10
D 11.11
E 11.12
Please contact me if you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
Rayn~ond C. R~igan
RCR~hmb
cc: Mr. Edward W. Harbes, Jr.
l!il
ULii SEP281 33
.0 ~ N
District
1000
Section
120.00
Block
03.00
Lot
Oil. Cch
CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT - THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY
THIS INDENTURE, made tbe ~74~ day o! ~,-~C/
BEI3~EEN EDWARD W. HARBES, JR., residing
New York, 11952
,,i.~een hundred ,ud m'h~
at Sound Avenue, Mattituc
partyolthelirstpart, and Edward W. Harbes, Jr., residing at Sound Avenue,
Mattituck, New York, 11952
party of the second part,
WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, i,, co.sideratiou of Te. Dollars and other valuable consideratb
paid by the party of tile second part, does hereby grant and rele,~e unto the party of tile second part, the hei
or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever,
ALL that certain plot, uieee or parce of and with tim. buildi.~s and improvements thereon erected, sltuat
Beginning at a point on the southerly line of Sound Avenue at t
northwesterly corner of land of gens and the northeasterly corner
of the premises herein described; running thence along said land of
gens and'along Plot C S.19°59'10"E.-1389.36 feel to Plot D; thence
along Plot D S.71°31'30"W.-305.21 feet to Plot A~ thence along
Plot A N.19°53'50"W.-1472.52 feet to',Sound Avenue; thence along
Sound Avenue Two Co~rses:
1) N.85°38'20"E.-178.42 feet; thence
2) N.88°13'50"E.-137.97 feet to the point of beginning.
Containing 10,000 acres.
Being and intended to be a portion of Parcel II of the same
premises conveyed to the party of the first part by deed dated
March 7, 1966 and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of Suffolk
County on December 29, 1966 in liber 6092 of deeds at page 327.
The aforesaid parcel was created by virtue of a resolution
adopted by the Town of Southold Planning Board held on May 24, 1993
TOGETIIER with all right title aud interest, if ally. ol the part) o[ the first part in and to auy streets a
roads abutting the above described premises to tile Center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurteuam
and all the estate and rights of the party of tim first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO ttOi
the premises herein granted unto tbe party of the second part. tim heirs or successors and assigns of the party
the second part forever.
AND ttm party of the first part cove.auts that tile party of tile first part has not done or suffered auything where
the said premmes bare been encumbered m any way wbalever, except as afor~a d.
AND the party of the first part, in compliance wid~ Section 13 o{ Ihe Lieu Law, covenants that the party of Ibc fi
part will receive the couslderatim~ for Ibis conveya.ce and will bold Ibc rlgbt to receive such cousideraffon a~
trust luud to be ap died first {or Ibc pmlmse of payi.g rite eosl of the improvemc.,t ami will apply the san]e first
the payment of tbe cost of the improven~cut before u~i.g any part of tim total of tbe same for any other purpose.
The word 'party" ~1 nil be co strued ns if it re~d 'p~rties ' wi e ever ti e sense of ti is h de ~ture so requires.
IN WITN~S WHEREOF~ tim part)' of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first abc
written.
IN PRESENCE (IF:
SEP2U 1993
Edward W. ~arbes, Jd~.
STATE OK NEW YORK, COUNTY OF Suffolk ss:
On tbe okLk{ day or ~ 19~]~, be[ore mc
pr. so.ally ca/nc Edward W. tlarbes, Jr.
to ,ne know,, to be the individual described in and who
exeelflcd tbc foregoing i.slrument, and acknowledged that
PAME~ A. KING
N~ P~c, Stale o[ New v,
No. 4862015
~alified in Su,olk
Commission Expires Jun~ 16,/~ ~
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF sst
On the day of 19 , before me
personally came
to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and
say that be resides at No.
that he is the
o[
, the cor~ratlon described
i. and wblcb executed the toregoing instrument; that he
knows fl~e seal o[ said corporation; ~at the seal a~x~
to said instrument is such corporate ~al; that.it was so
a~xed b~ order ot the board of dlr~tors o~ sa~ co~ora-
tlon, and that he si~ed b' n~e ther~o, by hke order.
STATE OF HEW YORK. COUNTY OF ss'.
0,, tim day or 19 . before me
)crsonally came
to ,ne k,,ow,, ~o be the i.dividual described in aad who
executed the [oregoi,,g i.,st~'ument, and acknowledged that
STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OE ss:
On tbe dtty of 19 , before me
personally came
tbe subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with
whom I a~n personally acquainted, who, being by me duly
sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No.
;
that he knows
to be the individual
described [n and who executed the foregoing instrument;
that tie, said subscribing witness, was present and saw
execute the same; and tbat he, said witness,
at the same time subscribed b name as witness thereto.
'ITLE No.
Edward W. Harbes, Jr.
SECTION 120.0 0
BLOCK 0 3. 0 0
~OT 0
COUNTY OR TOWN Suffolk County - Southol.
Edward W.
TO
Harbes,
Jr.
RETURN BY MAIL TO:
Edward W. Harbes, Jr;
Box 247
Sound Avenue
Mattituck, NY
Zlp No. 11952
COlvll,4ONWEALTH LAND
TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
A Reflar~ce Group Holdings C:oml:~ oy
,istrict
1000
~ection
120.00
03.00
CoNsULT yoUR LAWYER IIErORE SIGIIIIIG nOS iN$1RUMEItl - fills UISIRUMEI'II sUoULD g~ USED BY LAWYERS oHLY
BETW~N EDWARD W. IIARIiES, dR. , ,s[di ~ at Sound Ave~e, Mattituc
New York, 11952 ~
party of lite [irs, l,nlt, sad
Edward W. Harbes, Jr., residing at
Mattituck, New York, 11952
So~nd Avenue,
patty vi the second I,art, '
WI'I'IqESSE'I'II, ti,al the I,ally ! thc I st r , n co.side alio. ol Te. Dollars aud other valuable coosltlern
paid by tile pnrly of the second pa,i, docs hereby giant am lc else u t I lo pa ty ut the second putt, tile
L tba~ ce,tam ~b)l, ~ecc t r parcel ol ~at d. with Ibc buildings a.d h.proveu, ents tberemi erected,'sltu
Begfnnfn~ at a point on t~e westerly l~neor ~or~cnt
souheasterly corner of land of ~oroleskit ~00.0 feet southerly ~long
Aldrfch ~ane from Sound Avenue, safd point of begfnnfn~ befn9 the
northeasterly corner of the premfses herefn descrfbed~ rUnnfng then~
alon~ Aldrfch Lane five courses:
1) S.18°~3'50"~--550-73 feet~ thence
2} S.22°55'20"E.-20G-05 feet~ thence
J 3) S,27°25'20"E.-46.93 feet~ thence
4) S.24°55'20"ET61-81 feet;.ehence . ' ..... D
5~ S.21o55t20"E.-135.0 feet to Plot D, thence a~ong FlOC
~71o31~30aW.-585.72 feet to ~ot B;tthence ~ng~Plot B
~ 1~o~1~°W.-1139 36 feet to land Jens; thence along salG ~anG
~along land of Koroleski N.85°16'30 E.-590.28 feet to the point or
beginning.
Containing 13.946 acres.
Being and intetLded to be a portion of Parcel II of the same
premises conveyed to the party of the first part by deed dated
March 7, 1966 and recorded in the office of the Clerk of Suffolk
County on December 29, 1966 in liber 6092 of deeds at page 327.
The aforesaid parcel was created by virtue of a resolution
adopted by the Town of Soutbold Planning Board held on May 24~ 199
TOGETHER with all right, t tl~ and interest il' ally. Ut the [)art)' ut the first part ill and to ahy streets a
roads abutting the above descr bed ~ve~nises to tile Ce.,er Ii.es thereof: TOGETHER with the appurtenam
and all the estate and rights of the parry'of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOI
the premises herein granted u,,to the party of tile second part. the heirs or successors and assigns of the party
the second part forever.
AND !he party of the first part coveannts that tile party of the first part has not done or suffered anything where
tile said premises have been encun,bered in any way whatever, exce[~l:, as aforesaid. . ......
AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of tile Lien Law, covenants that me part}, ut ute n
~art wil receive tile consideration for this conveyance and will bold. the right to rec,etve..such co.n, smeratto~n a.:
trust fund to be appbed first for the purpose of. ! y' g P , . .... ~,
tile payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of tile total ut the sa,me lor any omer purpo, e
The word "party" ~hall be construed as if it read "patties" wheuever the sense ol tills indenture so reqmres.
Ilq WITMF-~S WHEREOF, the part}' of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first ab,
written.
[N PRESENCE OF:
Edward W. Harbes, J~.
to me I.~.w. lo be tile i.dlvidual dcseHbcd i. aud
execulcd the stone.
PAME~ A. KING
N~ Pubffc, Slat0 01N~w
No. 4~15
Qualilied i~ S~ffolk
Commissio. Expim; Ju~ I~ J~ ~
STAI~ O~ NEW YORK, COUNTY OF sst
O. the ~a~ of t9 , before me
pe~ sm. rally came
to me k.ow., wbo, being by me duly sworu, did depose hud
say Ilmt he resides at Ho.
Ihnt he i~ the
of
, the co~poration described
in ~.tl wb~cb executed Ihe lo~egomg.mstiume~ t; that he
k.ows the scm of said cmporatton, dtat dm seal nl~xc.I
lo said inst.mmnt is such co~porate ~nl; tlmt it was so
n~xed bff order el t¥ boa~d el dlr~to~s ul sah~ coq,ora-
tmu, an~ tbat Im ssffned Ir nmne tber~o, by hke
19 , belo~e me
de.rtl)ed i. mid who
a.d ack.owledged dlat
On the dsy o! 19 , belore me
personally came , .
tim sul,scribing witness to tbe toreg~m~ ~nstr~ment, witlt
whom I am perso.ally acquainted, who, oeln~oy me duly
swot., did depose and say that he r~ides arno.
;
Ibnt Im k.ows
to be the individual
desetil,ed iu a.d who executed the foregoing instrument;
Ihal he, said subsctibl.g witness, was preseut hud saw
execate the sm.e; and tbat he, said wltne~,
at the same lime subscribed b nmne as wltne~ tbereto.
~at8ailt alW ~alt ~}ttb
'l'tT~g NO.
Edward w, ttarbes~ Jr,
SECTION 120.
I~LOCK 03.00
COUNTY ORTOWN Suffolk County -SOuthb]
Edward W.
TO
Harbes, Jr.
RETIJP. N BY MAlL TO:
Edward W. ltarbes, Jr,
Box 247
Sout]d Aveltue
Mattituck, NY
ZlpNo. 11952
COivlMONWEALTH LAND
TITLE iNSURANCE COMPANY
A Reliance group Holdings Coln~l~y
CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING Tills INSTRUMENT - Tills INSTRUMENT SttOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY
THIS INDENTURE, made the t~/'-"~t'~N day of ~5~f~'~0~/'' , nln~een bundred and ~,'~-~
BETW~N EDWARD W. tlARBES, JR.,~ residing at Sound AvenUe, MaE~ituc
New York, 11952
party o! the first part, and Edward W.
Mattituck,
Harbes, Jr., residing at Sound Avenue,
New York, 11952
District
1000
Sec%ion
120.00
Block
03.00
Lot
oil,OIL
of the second part,
WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and od,er valuable consideratl,
by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto lite party of the second part, the bet
or successors and assigns of the party of the seco.d part forever,
that certaiu plot, niece or na~cel of land. with tile huildi.gs and improvemenls tl~ereon erected, altus
lying Beginning at a point on the westerly line of AldrtL'fl Lane at the northeaste,
corner of land of Bakowski; running thence along said land two courses;
1) S.78°28'40"W.-282.40 fee~; thence
2) S.79°34'00"W.-279-81 feet; thence continuing along land of
Bakowski and along land of Nedoszytko S.19°43'00''E--659.71 feet; thence continui~
along land of Nedoszytko and along land of Lebkuecher S.20°02'40''E.-940.64 feet;
thence continuing along~land of Lebkuecher three courses;
1) S.77°50'40"W.-176.78 feet;:~hence
2) S.76°31'10"W.-297.80 feet; thence
3) S.77°34'20"W.-130.34 feet; thence continuing along land of Lebkuecher and alo,
land of Cain S.73°O4'OO"W.-366.18 feet to land now or formerly of Fanning Estate
thence along said land N.19°47'10''W.-I269.83 feet to~and of Big E; thence along
said land N.19°45'OO"W.-388-21 feet to Plot D; thence along Plot D
N.71°31'30"E.-1523.20 feet to Aldrich Lane; thence along Aldrich lane
S.18°25'20"Er200.0 feet to the point of beginning.
Containin~ 39.349 acres.
Being and intended to be a portion of Parcel II of the same
premises conveyed to the party of the first part by deed dated
March 7, 1966 and recorded in the office of the Clerk of Suffolk
County on December 29, 1966 in liber 6092 of deeds at page 327.
The aforesaid parcel was created by virtue of a resolution
adopted by the Town of Southold Planning Board held on May 24, 199
'FOGETtiER with all right, title a d inlerest, if any. ol the part} of the first part iu and to say streets
roads abutting the above described premises to the Center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtena;
and all th.e esi~te and rights of the party of the first part in and to Said premises; TO tiAVE AND TO tit
the pren,ses bereln gra ted unto the party of the second part. Ihe heirs or successors and assigus of lite part
the secoml part forever. '
AND the party of the first part covens.ts that the party of tile first part bas not done or suffered anything whe
lite said pre,nises bane been e,,cumbered in any way .wbatever, e.xcel?, as ,aforesaid. . ...... ,
AND the party of the first hart, n co npliance witl~ Sectmn 13 of the L~en it,aw, covenants that me party o~ me
...... L ---t-~--ation for this conve*,anee and will bold the right to receive such consideratl, on
trust fund to be a~nhed first for the purpose of uaying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same fir
the payment of tge',cost of the improvement be[ore using any part of tl~e total of the same for any other .purpos
The word "party ~hall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever tile sense of lhis indenthre So reqmres.
IN WITNF-~$ WHEREOF, tl~e part}' of tile first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first
written.
Edward W. Harbes, J~.
STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OE Suffolk ss:
On the ~t.~ day of ~ 19~3, be[ore me
pe~so,,ally came Edward W. [lathes, Jr.
to ,,e known to be the individual described in and who
executed the fore~olng instrument, and adumwledged that
~ executed the same.
PAMELA ,q.~A~-
Notary Public. Stale ol New.
No. 4862015
Qualified In Suffolk Counly .
Comm~lon Expires June 16, 19 _~r.~
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF Ss:
0,1 the day of 19 , before me
personally came
to ,,,e known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and
say fl, at he resides at No.
;
that he is the
ol
, the corporation described
in and which executed the foregoing ins,fume,t; that he
knows tho seal of said corporation; that the seal alllxed
to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so
alhxed by order of the board of directors of said oorpora-
,ion, and that he signed It name thereto, by llke order.
STATE 01: NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss:
O,, thc (lay of 19 , before me
to ,,,e k,,own to be the individual described in and who
~xccutcd the ~orel~oing instrument, and acknowledged that
executed the same.
rATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss:
On the day o! 19 , before me
personally came
the subscribing wi,hess to the foregoing instrument, with
whom I am personally acquainted, who, bein~by me duly
sworn, did depose and say that he resides arno.
;
that be knows
to be the individual
described in and who executed the foregoing instrument;
that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw
execute the same; and that he, said witness,
at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto.
WI?iR COVENANT ACAINST GRANTOI~S Ac-,s
No.
Edward W. Harbes, Jr.
SECTION 120. ~0
BLOCK 03.00
LoT oll,OtZ..
COUNTY OR TOWN Suffolk Couty - Southol
TO
Edward W. Harbes, Jr.
R~--TURN BY MAIL TO:
Edward W. Harbes,
Box 247
Sound Avenue
Mattikuck, NY
Jr.
Zip No. 11952
COI,4t4ONWEALTH LAND
TITLE INSURANCE COI'4PANY
A Reliance Group Holdings Cc~npeny
District
1000
Section
120.00
Block
03.00
Lot
CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT - THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY
Tills INDENTURE, made tbe 6'~"/~'~ day of J~,'~ , nineteen bundred and tq'%-~_.
BET~VEEN EDWARD W. HARBES, JR., residing at Sound Avenue, Mattituck
New York, 11952
party of the first part, and Edward W.
Mattituck,
Harbes, Jr., residing at Sound Avenue,
New York, 11952 ~
party of the second part,
WITNF_.SSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable conslder~iop
paid by the ~rty of the second part, does hereby grant and rele~e unto the party of the second part, the heir:
or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever,
ALL that certain plot,~e or parcel of land. with the buildings and im,r~v.e.m, enls thereon greeted, situate
lying drifT"being in the ~g,~l~4' O~Y ~C~. ~tffK./~. .l~n O~ ~. . l~ ,~"~. '~r~ ~ ~'~ '~C~;q t ;
Beginning at a poin: on :ne son~nerxy xzne o: ~ounu ayah
northeasterly corner of land of gujawski and the northwesterly cornc
of the premises herein described; running thence along Sound Avenue
two courses:
1) N.83°45'30"E.-l13.93 feet; thence
2) N.85°38'20"E.-190.56 feet to Plot B; thence along Plot B
S.19°53'50"E.-1472.52 feet to Plot D; thence along Plot D
S.71°31'30"W.-297.73 feet to land of Kujawski; thence along said
land N.19°46'30"W.-1543.12 feet to the point of beginning.
Containing 10.255 acres.
Being and intended to be a portion of Parcel II of the same
premises conveyed to the party of the first part by deed dated
March 7, 1966 and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of Suffolk
County on December 29, 1966 in liber 6092 of deeds at page 327.
The aforesaid parcel was created by virtue of a resolution
adopted by the Town of Southold Planning Board held on May 24, 1993
TOGETHER with all ri,.ht title and inlerest, if any ol the party of the first part in and to any streets an
roads abutting the above described premises to the center hues thereof; IOGETHER wtth the appurtenanc:
and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOL
the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part. Ihe heirs or successors and assigns of the party
the second part forever.
AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part bas not done or suffered anything whereb
the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid.
AND the party of the first part in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the partly of the fir:
part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such cons aerate, on as
trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first t
the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose.
The word "party" ~hall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of lhis indenture so requires.
IN WITNF-~$ WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first abo~
written.
IN PRESENCE OF:
~~/Edwa'rd W. Har~s, ~ f~/~Jr] ~
STATE OF HEW YORK, COUNTY OE Suffolk ss:
On tbe ~q day of ~ 1~(?~ , before me
personally came Edward W. ttarbes, Jr.
to .,e known to be the individual described in and wbo
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that
K~ executed the same.
PAMELA A.~G
Notmy Pu~ic. State of N~,, v
No. 4862015
Ouafified in Suffolk C~u,:
Commission Expires Ju:lc!/(~/'~q~
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss:
On the day of 19 , before me
personally came
to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose .nd
say Ibat be resides at No.
;
tbat be is the
ol
, the corporation described
in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he
knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed
to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so
affixed by order of the board, of directors of said corpora-
tion, and that he signed h name thereto, by like order.
iTATE OF HEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss:
On the day of 19 , belore me
personally came
to me know,, to be the in4ividual described in and who
executed fl~e foregoing instrument, and acknowledged flaat
executed the same.
STATE O~ NEW YORK, .COUNTY OE sa:
On the day of 19 , before me
personally came
the subscribing witness to the foresoing instrument, with
whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly
sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No.
;
that he knows
to be the individual
described in and who executed the foregoing instrument;
that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw
execute the same; and that he, said witness,
at the same time subscribed h name as witnese thereto.
~atllain anb ~bale ~eeb
TITLE NO.
Edward W. Harbes, Jr.
SECTION 120 · 00
BLOCK 03 · 00
LOT olLt~o~
COUNTY OR TOWN Suffolk County -Southold
TO
Edward W. Harbes, Jr.
RETURN BY MAIL TO:
Edward W. Harbes,
Box 247
Sound Avenue
Mattituck, NY
Jr.
Zip No. 11952
COI MC WEALTH LAND
TITLE INSURANCE COF4PANY
A Reliance Group Holdings Coml:e ny
1000
Section
120,00
Block
.03,00
Lot
coblsULl YOUR LAWYER I~ErORE SIGIIIIIG 11115 11,151RUMEIt! -tills IUSIRUMEH! sUOULD lie USED BY LAWYERS dilLY
Tii ns emn Ni, m,.,,,, tm,, C3x,.x.j {..k day
BETWEEN EDWARD W. I{ARBES, dR., residing at Sound Avenue, Maktikt
~New York, 11952
patty 01 the filst I,,tt. and Edward W. Harbes, Jr. , residing at Sound Avenue,
Mattituck, New York, 11952
imtt~,' dj the sccontl pall,
WITNESSETII, Ihai Ibc Imlty el the first part, In conshJetatiou el 'l'e,~ IJolln~s .nd oil,er v.luable ce.,idea
iMd by Ihe ,nrt[ el Ihe secoml pall, does hereby gtnnt nmi ~elen~e unt. Ihe pn~ty o[ the seeo.d part, ihe
, I n.. wl ~ Ihe uild ~5 at? IIIJ~OVC ranis tlsemeo~ erected,'slt
Beginning at the poin~ on Ehe wesCerly line of Aldrich Lane,
200.0 fegL norEherly from Lhe northeasLerly corner ofiladdodf
Bakowsk%, said poin~ of beginning being ehe norLheasEerly corner
Plot E and Ehe souEheasEerly corner of ~he premises herein describ:
running Ehence along Plot E ~.71°31'30"W.-1523-20 Ieee Ed land of
Big E; Ehence along said land and along land of Fox N.19°45'00"W.
642~0 Ieee Ed land of Kujawski; ~hence along said land
N.73°3tJE.-340i47 feel Lo Plot A; Ehence along PloEs A,B and C
N.71°31~30"~.-1188.66 feel Ed Aldrich Lane; thence along Aldrich
~wo courses; ~.
1) S,21°55~20"E.-149.39 feet; %hence ~
2) S~18°25'20"E.-480.88 .fee~ %o the point of beginning.
Containing 22.166 acres.
Being and inkended to be a portion of Parcel II of the same
premises conveyed to khe party of the first part by deed dated
March 7, 1966 and recorded in the office of the Clerk of Suffolk
County on December 29, 1966 in liber 6092 of deeds at page 327.
The aforesaid parcel was created by virtue of a resolution
adopted by %he Town of Southold Planning Board held on May 24, 19;
TOGETItER with a right title and i.lerest if any. el tbe party o{ the fir.s~t part iii and to a.y streets
roads abutting the above described premises to the ~e.ter lines tl~ereof; TOGETHER with the appurlenan
and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part i,, and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HO
the premises herein granted unto the pa~ty of the second part. the heirs or successors and assigns 0{ tile part~
the second parl Iorever.
AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of tile first part has not done or suffered anything whet
the said premises have been encumbered in m,y way whatever, excep~ as a.foresaid. . .... , ·
AND the party of the first part. in compliance with Section 13 o~ the Lsen Law, covenants mat the pa~t~ o~ me ~
part will receive the consaderatio, for this coaveyance a.d wdl hold ihe right to receive such cons~aerat[on ~
' ~ s [ ,am the cost of the nn ~ovcme,,t and w apldy the same firs
trust {undtobea~,mcd first for thepu:1o ed y' g ' · , ' I ' . '
the payme.t of the cost of t ~e im,,prvvcmcnt before using nay l,a~t of thc tolal o[ the sa e l( r any otl er purpos,
The word "parly" ~hall he coustrued as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of Ibis indenture so requires.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the part)' o{ Ihe first part has duly executed d~is deed the day and year first ab
written.
IN PRESENCE OF:
Edward W. Harbes, ~.
came Edward W. flarbe$,
cxec.tcd the h,rc~oi.§ i.strume.t, .t.I .ck..wlcd~cd thai
~ exec.te~l tile some.
PAUE~ A~NG
No~a~ P~lic, Stale of New York
No. 4862015
Qualified in Suffolk C~umy
STATE O; HEW YORK, COUNTY OF
to me know., who, bei. g by me duly swo.~, did depose .nd
say tlmt he resides nt
;
that he is the
o[
, lira corl..atio, dcscHl..I
i. n J w c~ ¢xecsted Ihe lmcgol.g i.strumcut; llmt . he
k.ows the seal ol said cmporntlo.; dmt fire ~enl alhxed
to said i.st.ime, t is such corporate ~.l; that . w.s so
alBx¢tl by order ol the hoard of dlt~to~s of said
rio., a.d that he siffned h ~ ll~ne therMo by like ord¢r.
O. Ih. ,I.y .I
lo Iil1! k.'W" t" hc the i.divid-.I
t9 , belore me
¢lc~:Hbc~l i. ~.1 who
..(I .ck.owlcJged that
STATE OF NEW YORK, COU~ITY OF ss:
On the dsy o[ 19 , before me
perso.ally came . .
the subscrlbi.~ wit.ess to the foregoing ?strument, with
whom J at. I~rSo.ally acqual.t~, wh~, being by me duly
swo~., did (lepose a.d say that he [~zdes at No.
Ihat he knows
to be the i.divldual
described i. a.d who executed the [oregoi.g ' '
that line, said subscrd/ug witness, was prese, t and saw
execut, the sa.m; a.d Ihat he, said wilne~,
at the same time subscribed h .ame as wltne~ thereto.
Edward W~ tlarbes, Jr.
SECTION 1 2 0 . 0 O
I~LOCK 0 3.0 0
COUNTY OR TOWN Suffolk County-Southold
TO
Edward W. Harbes, Jr.
RETURN BY MAiL TO:
Edward W. llarbes,
Box 247
So~nd Avenue
Mattituck, NY
Jr,
Zip No. 11952
COMMONWEALTH LAND
TITLE INSURANCE COHPANIY
· ed itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on
2, 1993; and
subdivisJ
May 24,
a final public hearing was closed on said
application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York
and
WHEREAS
Regulations of
therefore,
1 the requirements of the Subdivision
Town of Southold have been met; and
RESOLVED,
conditional final
subject to fulfil]
conditions must be met
resolution.
Southold Town Planning
on the surveys dated J~
the following condit
six (6) months o~
4, 1993,
Ail
date of this
Submission of i)
mylars of the final
stamp of Health
Declaration of
pertaining to the sub(
paper prir
all c
and two (2)
a valid
& a notation that a
~tions was filed
Submission of a
Covenants and Restric
by the Town Attorney
of both Declarations of
have been approved
Submission, and
the Performance
Town Board, of
amount of $13,800.
Execution of
dedicated t,
Town At'
deed in regard
Town and approval
the area to be
such by the
Mr. Latham: . Sec
Mr. Ward:
recreation
would stil[
favor?
Mr
we had talked about thc
We have not put that as a
to pursue that. Motion second~
and
!ondition but we
Ail those in
Ayes: Latham, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski,
Edwards, Mr. Ward.
Mr Opposed? Motion carried.
Mr. Ward: 7:35 p.m. Harbes Farm - This proposal is for four
lot line applications which are being processed concurrently.
Harbes Farm contains five single and separate parcels. The
proposed lot line changes are to reconfiqure the existing five
lots. Additional lots are not being created.
. SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANN~ BOARD 4 MAY 2~ 1993
SCTM #1000-120-3-11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, & 11.6. Is there
anybody here this evening that is opposed to these lots line
changes? Is there anybody here that would like to offer any
comments neither pro nor con but may have information regarding
the project? Is there anybody here in support of this
application? What is the pleasure of the Board.
Mr. Orlowski: I make a motion to close the hearing.
Mr. Latham: Second.
Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. Ail those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. Ward, Mr. Orlowski,
Mr. McDonald, Mr. Edwards.
Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Chairman, I would like to offer the following
resolution.
WHEREAS, Edward Harbes Jr., is the owner of the property
know and designated as SCTM #1000-120-3-11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5
& 11.6, located on the south side of Sound Avenue and west side
of Aldrich Lane in Mattituck; and
WHEREAS, these lot line applications consists of four lot
line applications which are being processed concurrently and are
to be known as Harbes Farm; and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the
State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617,
declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on
May 3, 1993; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision
Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and be it
· therefore,
RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant
conditional final approval to the surveys dated May 21, 1993
together with the set of maps dated February 12, 1993 showing
each stage of the individual lot line changes and authorize the
Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to fulfillment of
the following condition within six (6) months of the date of
this resolution:
Submission of the revised deed for each of the
five (5) parcels.
Mr. Latham:
Mr. Ward:
Ayes: Mr.
Second.
Seconded'. Ail those in favor?
Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. McDonald,
Tom 5 mY 1993
Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward.
Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried.
7:40 p.m. Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer - This
lot line change is to reconfigure two lots of 45,7
and 41,246 square feet, both of which have
on Road and Nassau Point Road into two lot
one 45,4 square feet in area having frontage only on
Wunneweta and the other 44,531 square feet in are
having only on Nassau Point Road. Both lot: and
will have, ~ing houses. SCTM #1000-111-8-5 & 6. there
anybody here would like to address the Board this
application?
Nobody present, is the pleasure of the
Mr. McDonald: Mr.
close this hearing.
I would like to
a motion to
Mr. Latham: Second.
Mr.'Ward: Motion seconded
those
Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. McDona lowski,
Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward.
Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carr.
Mr. McDonald: I Would like motion.
WHEREAS, the Estate of
the property known and des
located at Nassau Point
and
~ted as S,
Meyer is the owner of
#1000-11-8-5 & 6;
Cutchogue;
WHEREAS, this lc ne change, to be as proposed lot
line change for the ~te of Evangeline A. is to
reconfigure two lot ~ 45,746 square feet 246 square
feet, both which frontage on both Wunnewe and
Nassau Point .nto two lots, one 41,461 feet in area
having fronta¢ [y on Wunneweta Road, and the 44,531
square feet 'ea having frontage only on Nassau Road.
Both lots and will have, existing houses.
.State
declar~
May 3
the Southold Town Planning Board the
~nmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8) Par 7,
~self Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declar~ on
)3; and
S~
a final public hearing was closed on said
~ision application at Town Hall, Southold, New York on
~993; and
SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
SUBJECT: Hc~rb~ F~r~
SCTM#: [ ~-.0- ~k.- I 11-
COMMENTS: ~- p¢¢~ prints
~UTHO~ TOWN
~ ~NNING BOARD
SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
DATE: s~/~.~l~3
SENDER: ~0~ ~
st~ECT: ~rk5
SCTM#:
CO~ENTS: ~L
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
S'VAI'IEOF NEW YORK
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY
GIVEN that pursuant to Sec-
tion 276 of the Town Law, a
public hearing will be held by
the Southold Town Planning
Board, at the Town Hall, Main
Road, Southold, New York in
said Town on the 24th day of
May 1993 on the question of
the following:
7:30 p.m. Final approval of
the minor subdivision for
Hanauer/Bagley - Too Bee
Realty, at Southold, in the
Town of Southold, County of
Suffolk, State of New York.
Suffolk County Tax Map
Number 100-50-6-4 & 5.
The property is bordered on
the north by land now or
formerly of Hanauer &
Bagley; on the east by
Lighthouse Road; on the
south by land now or former-
ly of A. McGunnigle; on the
west by land now or formerly
of A. Stepnoski.
7:35 P.M. Final approval for
4 lot line changes being pro-
cessed concurrently for the
Harbes Farm at Mattituck,
Town of Southold, County of
Suffolk, State of New Yolk.
Suffolk County Tax Map
Number~ 1~1~!~3-11.2, 11.3,
11.4, IL5~ iL6]
The property is bordered on
the north by Sound Ave,; on
the west by land now or
formerly Kajawski, Big E~ and
easterly line of Riverhead
Town; on the east by land now
or formerly of Lebkuecker,
Nedoszytko, Bakowski, and
Aldrich Lane; on the south by
land now or formerly of Cain
and Lebkuecker.
7:40 P.M. Final approval for
the lot line change for the
Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer
at Cutchogue, Town of
Southold, County of Suffolk,
State of New York. Suffolk
County Tax Map Number.
100-111-8-5 & 6.
The property is bordered on
the west by Wunneweta Road;
on the east by Nassau Point
Road; on the south by land
now or formerly Edward A.
Meyer and wife; on the north
by land now or formerly of
Martin J. Vandyne and Phyllis
Vandyne.
7:45 P.M. Final approval for
the lot line change for Harold
Reese Sr., et al, and Otto Uhl
Jr., et al, at East Marion, Town
of Southold, County of Suf-
folk, State of New York. Suf-
folk County Tax Map
Number. 100-22-3-15.1, 18.1 &
18.3.
The property is bordered on
the north by Dam Pond and
Long Island Sound; on the
west by land now or formerly
of Otto Uhl Jr., et al, George
F. Russel, Otto Uhl Jr., Russell
V. and Catherine Broach and
Frank R. Russel; on the south
by land now or formerly of
Margaret Gruimaris~ Dorothy
E. Cook and John and Luz
Psaroudahis; on the east by
land now or formerly of
Myron B. Brown, Frank E.
Begora, Jr. and Iris R. Begom,
Ronald Edeen, Jr. and Bar-
bara Edeen, Frank R. Russel
and others, Andrew Lettieri,
Joseph Frederick Gazzo, Ber-
nice Lattieri, and Joseph
Frederick Gazza.
Any person desiring to be
heard on the above matter
should appear at the time and
place specified.
Dated: May 11, 1993
BY ORDER OF THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
1X-5/13/93(1)
Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that slle is the
Editor, of I-HE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN,
a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County;
;md th;Il Ibc notice ol which the ;mnexc(I is ;i prinlcd copy,
h,s hetm puiqishcd in said I_ong Iqand
successively, commencing on the ......... ......
Swo~n I(~ before nit Ibis .................... day ~i
Notary Public:
B^RB^RA ^. SCHNEIDER
NOTARY PUBLIO, State of NEW York
No. 480'6-346
Qualified in Suffolk County
Commission Expires ~/3t/9~
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latharn, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
May 4, 1993
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
sco'i'r L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Edward Harbes, Jr.
P.O. Box 247
Sound Ave.
Mattituck, NY 11952
Re:
Proposed Lot Line Change
for Harbes Farm
s/s Sound Ave., Mattituck
SCTM# Z~I~3~I;~'i~11,3~ 11..4, 11.5 & 11.6
Dear Mr. Harbes:
The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town
Planning Board at a meeting held on May 3, 1993.
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting
under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead
agency status on this Type 1 action, make a determination of
non- significance, and grant a Negative Declaration.
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday,
May 24, 1993 at 7:35 P.M. for a final public hearing on the maps
dated February 5, 1993.
Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your
records.
Sincerely,
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
enc.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OFSOUTHOLD
State Environmental Quality Review
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice of Determination Non-Significant
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
May 3, 1993
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the
implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State
Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law.
The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has
determined that the proposed action described below will not
have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Name of Action:
Lot Line Change
Harbes Farm
SCTM#: 1000-120-3-11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5 & 11.6
Location: South side of Sound Ave., Mattituck
SEQR Status:
Type I ( X )
Unlisted ( )
Conditioned Negative Declaration:
Yes ( )
No ( X )
Description of Action:
This proposal is for 4 lot line applications which are
being processed concurrently. Harbes Farm contains five
single and separate parcels. The proposed lot line changes
are to reconfigure the existing five lots. Additional
lots are not being created.
Page 2 - Harbes Farm
SEQR Negative Declaration continued
Reason Supporting This Determination:
An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and
reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse
effects to the environment were likely to occur should the
project be implemented as planned.
There has not been any correspondence received from the
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there
are no comments or objections from that agency.
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Melissa Spiro
Address: Planning Board
Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938
CC:
Thomas Jorling, DEC Albany
Roger Evans, DEC SUNY
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
ROBERT J. GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
ARTHUR H, KUNZ
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
March 30, 1993
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman
Town of Southold Planning Board
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Plat Name: Harbes Farm
Tax Map No.: 1000-120-3-11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5 & 11.6
SCDP File No.: S-SD-93-03
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
Pursuant to the requirements of Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk
County Administrative Code, the above captioned proposed final plat which has
been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a
matter for local determination; however, this shall not be construed that the
Commission has either approved or disapproved this particular plat.
Very truly yours,
Arthur H. Kunz
Director of Planning
FD:mb
S/s Frank Dowling, Senior Planner
Subdivision Review Division
HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788
APR - Igg3
SOUTHOLD
PtAMNING ,..,,~
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S, McDonald
Kenneth L, Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
1993
RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request
Dear Reviewer:
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8
(State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental
Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following:
1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below;
2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead
agency; and
3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.
Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed
Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response.
Project Name:
Requested Action: -f~;s
SEQ~ Classification:
( ) Unlisted
Contact Person: ~a~q
(516)-765-1938
The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental
impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of
the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you
have an interest in being lead agency.
Planning Board Position:
( ~ ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency
status for this action.
( ) Other. ( See comments below).
Comments:
Please feel free to contact this office for further information.
Sincerely,
cc: ~-- ~ cf Appeals .
~ui!ding'DcDartmen~
Southold Town Board
~ NYSDEC - Stony Brook
NYSDEC - Albany
S.C. n~-~ ~ ~"~b~c Works
U.S. ~ .... Cord ~ Engincurs
* Maps are enclosed for your°review
Coordinating agencies
Richard G. ward
chairman
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr,
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
~larch 23, 1993
Richard Hanley
Planning Department
Riverhead Town Hall
200 Howell Avenue
Riverhead, New York
11901
RE: Proposed Lot Line Changes
Harbes Farm
S/S Sound Avenue, Mattituck
$CTM9 1000-120-3-11.2, 11.3,
11.4, 11.5 and 11.6.
Dear Mr. Hanley:
The Southold Town Planning Board is reviewing 4 lot line
change applications for the above mentioned property. The
proposed applications are being processed concurrently. The
changes have been indicated on one map in addition to being
shown on individual maps for each stage.
I have enclosed the above mentioned maps for your review
since one of the involved parcels is located on the westerly
line of Southold Town adjacent to Riverhead Town.
The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination
process on March 22, 1993. I have also enclosed a copy of the
Lead Agency Coordination Request.
Please contact me at 765-1938 if you have any questions
regarding the above.
Sincerely,
Melissa Sp~ro
Planner
Encl.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
March 23:1993
Edward Harbes, Jr.
P.O. Box 247
Sol/nd Avenue
Mattituck. New York
11952
RE:
Proposed Lot Line Change
for Harbes Farm
S/S Sound Avenue, Mattituck
$CTM# 1000-120-3-11.2,
11.3, 11.4, 11.5 & 11.6.
Dear Mr. Harbes:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southoud Town
Planning Board on Monday, March 22, 1993:
Be it RESOLVED that the $outhold Town Planning Board start
the lead agency coordination process on this Type 1 action. The
proposed Lot Line change has been classified as a Type 1 action
under the State Environmental Quality Review Act because the
subject property is located within a Special Groundwater
Protection Area.
Please contact this office if you have any questions
regarding the above.
Sincerely,
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
COr~MENTS: ~
SENDER:
SUBJECT:
SCTM~:
COMMENTS:
SUBMISSION WITHOU~T COVER LETTER
RODERiCK VAN TUYL, P.C.
218 FRONT STREET
GR£ENPORT, NEW YORK 11944
(516) 477~I 170
Southold Town Planning Board DATE Feb. 18, 1993
Town Hall
Southold, NY 11971 SUBJECTHarbes line-changes
Dear Staff:
Enclosed are copies of the Harbes maps showing the
successive stages of proposed line-changes, as well as one copy
of the ultimate plan. These are for preliminary approval.
If so approved in essence, the final lines will be
calculated and shown on our 100-foot scale map to show the exact
outline of each of the five parcels.
Trusting that these will serve your immediate purpose,
I am
Very truly yours
R. Van Tuyl
N72 The D~wi.g Board, Dallas. Texas 75266-0429
~., 1982
FOLD AT (-) TO Fit DRAWING BOARD ENVELOPE # EWIOP
RODERICK VAN TUYL, P.C.
218 FRONT STREET
GRE£NPORT, New YORK 11944
(516) 477~) 170
TO
Southold Town Planning Board DATE Feb. 18, 1993
Town Hall
Southold, NY 11971 SUB°ECTHarbes line-changes
Dear Staff:
Enclosed are copies of the Harbes maps showing the
successive stages of proposed line-changes, as well as one copy
of the ultimate plan. These are for preliminary approval.
If so approved in essence, the final lines will be
calculated and shown on our lO0-foot scale map to show the exact
outline of each of the five parcels.
Trusting that these will serve your immediate purpose,
I am
Very truly yours
R. Van Tuyl
L
- ML5N72 The (~awing Board, Dallas, Texas 75266-0429
"'- I~C., 1982 FOLD AT (-) TO FIT DRAWING BOARD ENVELOPE # EW10P
SENDER:
SUBJECT:
SCTM~:
COMMENTS:
SUBMISSION WITHOU~T COVER LETTER
I 1993
$OUTHOL;
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P~r6PERTY RECORD CARD "~
OWNER STREET '~ -~ VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT
: .>/:,: - ,~ ,.
S W OODE / ~ d~ DATE OF OONSTRUOTION
~ND ~M~. TOTAL ~ATE ~KS
~oo o ~r r~ ~;/k, i .i., i,~ ,, ., ., ~'~ ,,
.~1,~" " " ~oo "
..... ~-'
W~land . FRONTAGE-ON-ROAD
M~ad~land DEPTH
Hou~ Plot ~U~D
TOtal
OWNER
FoRME OWNER
PROPERTY RECORD CARD -7:~ .~ ~'I
DISTt
VILLAGE
/n1~ 7'~ Tu cK
E
W
LOT
ACR. I '
TYPE OF BUILDING
SEAS.
IMP.
$3o0
AGE
NEW~b
FARM
Tilloble
Tillable 3
Woodland
Ac re
',,~.4. (.
DATE
COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value
Sw]mplond FRONTAGE ON WATER
Bru~hlend FRONTAGE ON ROAD
Ho6se Plot DEPTH
BULKHEAD
Totol
DOCK
/~..~ _/i,~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD -~., x_//
Swomplond FRONTAGE ON WATER
Brushlond FRONTAGE ON ROAD
House Plot * DEPTH
BULKH~D
Totol DOCK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RE(:ORD CARD-~2-x~-~/
FORMER OWNER N
R~ S~S. VL. '~ FAR~ /~C COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Volue
Woodland
Swampland FRONTAGE ON WATER
Brushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD
House Plot - DEPTH
BULKH~D
Total DOCK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD
FORMER OWNER
~~ ~/'~ ~"~/- S - m W ~ ': ~PE OF BUILDING
~ND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS
/ / /
N~n~ NORM*L
~ Acre Volue Per
F ~ ~ ~ ~/~ /~7 ~, " ' ~o~ '/' / /:-,,
Tillable 2
Tillable 3
Woodland
Swampland FRONTAGE ON WATER /
Brushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD
House Plot ' DEPTH
BULKH~D
Total DOCK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
PROPERTY RECORD CARD
OWNER
'FORMER OWNER
C ~ ,vi ~ ,.,q" ,A"
lq, .: ./.-,
ti "D "; :,Ir ~ ,t ......
LAND IMP. TOTAL
// oo
NEW
FARM
Tillable
Woodland
Meadowland
House Plot
Total
NORMAL
Acre
STREET
N
VILLAGE
//eo
DATE
Bff_ ILDING CONDITION
'ZT f,~ .% l.~,'l f? t
BELOW /ABdVE
Value Per
Acre
V~lue
-_/-oao
SUB. LOT
,:~.
ACR. ,-~' -
TYPE OF BUILDING
CB. MICS. Mkt. Value
REMARKS
~, ', ~19oo
FRONTAGE ON WATER
DEPTH
BULKH~D
~OCK
SUBJECT:
SCTM~:
COMMENTS:
SUBMISSION WITHOU~T COVER LETTER
//
' //
i , co
I,~ ~
_ ]~ IAA c)
I
· -I I.-t
°1°
ZZ
10. SA(c)
I
qlO
I I le4
I I I.,5 a(c)
I
Z
36.0A(c)
11(,5
11.6A(c)
-- Z
p~RCEL N' N~.~-
SEE SEC, NO. ~
120-O5-011.5 ~-
1.6
1.6A(c)
FOR PARCEL NO.
SEE SEC. NO.
120-03-011.6
SCH. D. 9
SCH. D.I
2,,r
28.5A(c)
5
I. IA(c)
6
1.3A(c)
11o3
:>4,1A(c)
12
7.0A (c) ~
6.OA (d)
,
~OUTHOLD TOWN
I~tANNING BOARD
lO,! ,¢1¢,
'i
d
?
T
~J
;,3 s~