Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-118.-6-1 (2)
SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES SUBJECT TO COVENANTS& RESTRICTIONS USER II HAUFPAUGE. NET YQTY SEP 05 1991 PAGE n�Q__ IRIS IS TO CERTIFY INIT TME PROPOSED ARRAMSID41W Fpi - / WATER 6LPPLYAM 6E14ADARK SANDY G£DISPOSAL FOR TOPSOIL 1 HARRY G . & JANET HOHN SANDY m /� ARORNI LANE IN „�. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 11 S. CLAY m YfIH A TOTAL � 3 LOTS PERE APPROVED ON THE ABOVE DATE. )NESE SANG w �o O FACILITIES MUST CQN Af TO CONSTRUCTION STAM)ARDS IN EFFECT AT THE & TIRE OF CONSTRUCTION. lHI6 APPROVAL SHALL BE ✓ALTO ONLY IN TFE SOME g EVENT SAID SURDIVISION/OEVELCPM:WT PLAN 15 DULY FILED WITH THE i4v GRAVEL COUNTY CLETY WITHIN 5 MINIMS OF THIS DATE. ^ GROUND WATER t2. QO CONSENT 15 M=REHY GIVEN FOR THE FILING OFsI],�NAP ON WHIGH THIS EM)ORSETIENT APPEARS IN THE OFFICE OF ORff COUNTY CLERK IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE PUBLIC REAGIN LAY AM »� TEST HOLE DATA N sGFFOLN COUNTY SANITARY CODE. 4 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION NAP OF SECTION S. NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. FILE NO. 745 FILED: OCTOBER 4. 1919 = KEY MAP SUBDIVISION HAP OF AMENDED MAP A" OF NASSAU POINT FILE NO. 156 FILED: AUGUST 16, 1922 ALDO ANOREOLI. P.E. errand SCALE: 1 " = 600' AMroaed in arcardmice%it I UI a dol Rk1 '' - surface _ �eI LINE OF ORANGE RIBBONS DELINEATING JUL 1 4 19 —_ UPLAND EDGE OF TIDAL WETLANDS PLACED dv1$ntinatlopdn:xd Pump t° be F BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THIS OFFICE 5 G.P.M. placed in o MN/FAU CHARLES\ ON JANUARY 23, 1990. -- (min.) frost-proof 8 1 MAUOE B. HAMMER I t pump at rue tura. j PART OF LOT 93 I MI ci 2 T PLAN 50 nox s.T� 54.42'0 'E �2' O min. to 42 gal. Qf�v�v 143.03 fmfn,l tank W 3 1 LOT 96 Nunlmm a CONSERVATION �7 ground tmaN ipN EASEMENT AREA 1' min, _ground _eater V w outlet 2 q ax toter be N LOT 97 LOT 9B H LOT 99 LOT /0/ 819 R4'3"- F- inlet: 1/4"/ft. 40' 'c r` - •WELL EXISTING NOTES: pitchI/8"/ } 6" _ J _ _ z DRIVEWAY 1/B"/ft. g"�; ll uid level BUILDING {, aring M si EXISTING .WELL "ENVELOPE" 1 . THE BUILDING "ENVELOPES" SHOWN HEREON --� sand pnd gravel POND CLEARING pipe: min. 4" dao, w YAJER Er. = J7, INCLUDE ALL PORTIONS OF EXISTING BUILDINGS AME; aloes 2400 z o+' N 54° 42' DO" E 730.M_ QBQRN LANE an. STRUCTURES. { f25' WIDE PRIVATE ROAD] Lrnxrxs SECTION On 1 BUILDING 502°46'//"W iraelicw 271 363.63 LLL 366.32 43. 6 I e' a o a 50.00 15z - LIT i LIL i NyT 2. LOTS 1 & 2 SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO NASSAU 4 ip� 'ENVELOPE" - oFsut PORCH 1 rE�Ou.. D lsz ",TYPICAL SEPTIC TANK o r EncE Pow or� Z w o c e A 1\ 15B NON - DISTURBANCE POINT ROAD BY MEANS OF A MAXIMUM 16' WIDE { TYPICAL WELL INSTALLATION V w 2 DECERBER /5, 19B9� / Y� h 22' AREA DRIVEWAY WHICH SHALL MEANDER TO AVOID LARGE �sraRr//0ii/ /�Y/////S.F. mb CONSERVATIONi (2D' WIDE) TREES. 51.429 F. � � EASEMENT �5, p ryh O� PLIRCH B _ AREA `� \ °, m�Aer/ �'� 2 i5' 6Oh ryh AP 3. THE PORTION OF LOT 2 LYING NORTHWESTERLY i AwvI 1NrT 53 OF THE EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF ABORN I _ , I w 3 �; /y7 r' v=9D•Co'00" oas,rw. ca /sa �� LANE TO THE SHORE LINE OF GREAT PECONIC BAY STREET LINE VI o 2 LEACHING L < o - 1 1/z 159. 972 5 . F. `'�? cA'AGF n R=30.00 c.,.• v. 5' ,MIN. POOLS - ground surface I: w SY, srcvY Lw.L' a L 4T 12 J .It1 COMPRISES PART OF LOT 93 ON PROPOSED -JI 5' MiN. ��l/sE �/ IN ��� o I7' N 5P 42'00"E 132. 15 51 "7 �• 0 Imo " min.-2' mpz. a° n "1_ IN S 54.42'00'V 200,00 I � SUBDIVISION MAP OF SECTION B, NASSAU POINT CLUB pips. 2400 i cal 15' J a.n, �, i J PROPERTIES, INC., FILE NO. 745, FILED: OCTOBER 4, '5'MIN: pipe. 4" min. dta. o r I�I ��L v, N5/^42•p0"E 530.50 16' WIDE EASEMENT ..so v' 1919 & SUBDIVISION MAP OF AMENDED MAP "A" OF v 'IT pltph:l/B"/ft. 2' max. z N W `_ -: `J « nr AREA, TO CONTAIN t3 N/FRICHARD 6 • �,� NASSAU POINT, FILE NO. 156, FILED: AUGUST 16, 1822. 75•�F C� CHRISTOPHER B' MIN. _ 20" w ,� HOLE COMMON DRIVEWAY 92 �.� HURLEY O THIS PORTION OF LOT 93 ON AFORESAID MAPS IS TO BE Vis, 900 GAL. m /// F SEPTIC TANK �-� FOR LOTS 1 & Z. g � c.n. a� o OP ABANDONED. 2'-9" 155,° � A E;t °.n.' ,: -- 06, 200.00 Nrr z584 S .F. a>n .. 5� lOz9• ��`� CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA 100.56 fire a, " O 10' MIN. z min. -�I ?n W 9 / �T �ie.ao 3' iIp ., / TEST WELL t2 MEFI 5 IP22'10"E . min. M -� 15' Atl.' / .y4e Nrr 100EO HOUSE 11'-9n ,^_, Z LMIam Lf( /55-5 RIE LINE ONLY] / " S 54°43'00'V 714.68 / min. a I 6 TOP OF eu.�Ap nw, ser ms i� erz rvg no L Ta-` Q Ya se u< o pe e. '\ NON - DISTURBANCE By BLUFF vV,E, L ° 5 1� Lfe (20AREA ' WIDE) pPPR `'ED VELLI Ica 0 a LINE EXISTING N F MARIO d ILSE TROMBONE A /� OV I 5' MIN., I CLEARING EXISTING i�0 IE--5' MIN. MIN I a o v DRIVEWAY / no pl,p,NNINCi BOA - - - 5 �MIN. ° `m 2' in. BUILDING T01N N OFSOUTHOLO -� LOT LINE clean and ground eater "ENVELOPE" � D SEP D TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT TYPICAL LEACHING POOL COMMON DRIVEWAY FOR LOTS 1 & 2 TO CONTINUE TO NASSAU POINT ROAD THROUGH THIS AREA (ACTUAL COURSE OF SAID SBI 3 01991 DRIVEWAY TO MEANDER TO AVOID LARGE TREES). A . PUNNING TO i THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLAT PREPARED: JANUARY 31, 1991 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK' S OFFICE FILING DATE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE " SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD BY RESOLUTION DATED NO. DA IS REVISION 7-17-91 Added T W.I2 FINAL PLAT DATE OF SIGNING: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD 2 7-2A-91 R Added.lot layout & leeching pool ❑alai/. 3 8-30-91 Building Envelopes 1991 CHAIRMAN 4 9-05-91 Common Drive for lots t & 2 5 9-16-91 Note r 3, Delete MINOR SUBDIVISION MAP OF Pond easement THE SUBDIVIDER MAKES NO OFFER OF DEDICATION TO THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WITH RESPECT TO THE LANDS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. ENGINEER 6 SURVEYOR HARRY G . AND THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL LOTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING CODE. JOHN J. RAYNDR. P.E. d L.S. . F.C. DEERFIGREEN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE By ME FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS MONTAUKH HIGHWAY COMPLETED JANUARY 23, 1990 AND THAT ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN EXIST AND THAT THEIR POSITIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN. - NATER MILL, NEN YORK 11976 OWNERS JANET H 0 H N ty( HARRY G. d JANET HORN F 200 EAST 657H STREET A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS & RESTRICTIONS, WHICH THIS SUBDIVISION WILL APPEAR IN DISTRICT 1000 I SEP 18 NEW YORK. NEW YORK 100,7 AFFECTS LOTS IN THIS SUBDIVISION, HAS BEEN FILED IN THE ON SECTION SHEET 118.DD IN BLOCK 05.00 OF THE SITUATE �I "I I�91 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE AT LIBER 113f3 OF SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP. PARCEL NUMBERS ARE SHOWN CONVEYANCES, PAGE n PLAT PREPARED BY e -- SUBDIVISION DATA 13_x. THUS: NASSAU ', PO.I NT JOHN J. RAYNDR, P.E. d L S. F.0. ' I BfFi. DF SPIE Dc NEVy yG TOTAL AREA: 7.358 ACRES THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL AVICES 6 2 RAyNOgA SYSTEMS FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT :<a OF "Ew REAL PROPERTY TAX SERVICE AGENCY ,I. NUMBER OF LOTS: SUM OF LOT AREAS: 7.368 ACRES COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENT e 0`1 > RAy OPS- TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - �•- OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 106,983 S.F. HEALTH SERVICES. it FIRE DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE INN J. RAYNOR, LAND SURVEYOR NO. 49318 ` OF•,• �" L14�-IS �° POSTAL DISTRICT: v MILL, NET/ YDRK \�eF %l"E CUTCHOGUE SCHOOL DISTRICT: MATTI TUCK - \ •�` _/_;�/ SCALE: 1 " = 100' - - - CU70HOGUE JOHN J. RAYNDR, P.E. NO. 53385 �° �1 TDO --= ZONING DISTRICT: R-40 WATER MILL, NEW YORK 0 m0 200 300 THIS MINOR SUBPTV15iON IS FOR Aga LOTS ON 7S ACRS LL•CAf ED ON 'n+soii �wtsi ro�ne� o� A`aOer% L rMi/�e�ssa�f�tR41rI _t7orGv'o ;-C SCTM# 1000- 11'9-(v— 1j- 3 MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) _ Complete application received Application reviewed at work session PUL' OK �[ INro. Applicant advised of necessary revisions `� qa _ Revised submission received -emi oK AW OK INro. Sketch plan approval -with conditions .ilf�iLqL farjj: . �Ffod Lead Agency Coordination Safi ! SEQRA determination N � , 4e-e , ��lilgl Sent to Fire Commissioner — Receipt of firewell location Notification to applicant to include on final map 2114,11 /Jo r�1U ✓<J Sent to County Planning Commission i IS 2 07K Receipt of County Report a ^ I oK Review of SCPC report IlyI_ /+* � ram lDraft Covenants and Restrictions received h191 e2i OK IJ Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed i2�i – I m. 911-Zit,i T1,46 ��igAJfi Filed Covenants and Restrictions received r Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval . Final Public Hearing X11 ooc*j Approval of subdivision -with conditions Endorsement of subdivision •11S l�tl/`rU PART 1—PROJECT INFOIATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NO ICL: This der Littent is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment }'lease complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Minor Subdivision of Harry G. & Janet Hohn LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Munlclpellty and County) Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, Suffolk County, New York NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Harry G. & Janet Hohn (212 ) 576 - 5077 ADDRESS New York Life Insurance Co., 51 Madison Avenue CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE New York I NY 10010 NAME OF OONER(Il ddlerent) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Eda McKnight Kolbe ( ) ADDRESS 631 Bentley Drive CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Naples FL 33963 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivision of a 7.368 acre parcel into four (4) single-family residential lots. Two of the three proposed waterfront lots contain existing dwellings. There is a bulkhead along the unimproved waterfront parcel's frontage on Great Pecenic Bay. The fourth lot is upland. Individual wells and sanitary systems are proposed. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. L Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ■Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 7.368 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested 4.66 acres 3.69 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 1 acres • 1 acres Water Surface Area •87 acres •87 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) earth drives/beach .86 acres •86 acres Roads,'buildings and other paved surfaces • 72 acres • 72 acres Other (Indicate type) landscaped areas .76 acres 1 .13 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Plymouth loamysand Riverhead sandy loam & beach a. Soil drainage: ■Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained _ % of site b If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes ONO a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 14-1 :-2 (2187)-7c `►' P 617.21 �......,.� . SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review it,3 �c FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT M Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in [n orderl tk� rrfer, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant iasy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.` ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions MINOR SUBDIVISION OF HARRY G. S JANET HOHN Name of Action Planning Board, Town of Southold Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 • i.'A,pproximate percentage or proposed profit site with slopes: ■0-10% 75 ■10-15% 15 % 015% or greater 10 % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? '—Yes ■No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ONO 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-31 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ■Yes ❑No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Eyes ONO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? []Yes ONO According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the proiect site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Eyes ❑No Describe A bluff and beach exist along portions of the property's frontage on Great Peconic Bay 13. ;s the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? :]Yes ENO If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? 7—Yes ONO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Unnamed tidal pond & creek a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Great Peconic Bay 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Great Peconic Bay b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ■Yes ONO a) If Yes, does.sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ■Yes []No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ■Yes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes NINo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Eyes ONO 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? []Yes ENO B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 7.368 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 7.368 acres initially; 7.368 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped none acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 12 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 4 Ultimately 4 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 35 height; unknow width; unknown length. I. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 330 ft. 3 2. flow much natural materMIT 0 e . rock, earth, etc.) will be removed fnn'6 the site?indeterminate:❑;/cubic yards I Will disinrbed areas be reclaimed? NYes .: L]No ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intend _ purpose is the site being reclaimed? Landscaped areas around dwellings b. Will topsoil he stockpiled for reclamation? Eyes ❑No C. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ■Yes ❑No 4. I low many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? •97 acres. 5 Will any mature forest (over 100 years olM or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes, ■No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 12 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N/A "t a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. t. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ■No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction _ None after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project None '3 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes •No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ■No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Eyes t ❑No Type Household sanitary wastes 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ■No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Eyes ❑No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ■Yes ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month 1 .4 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Eyes ❑No c. If yes, give name Southold Municipal Landfill ; location Cutehogue d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ■No P. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ■No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes ■No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Oyes ■No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes ■No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ■Yes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) E1ectr1c11) ,•_fossi1 fuels 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 1200 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or rederal funding? Dyes ■No If Yes, explain _ -- 4 25.,Approvals Required: . Submittal Type Date City. Town, ''village 3oard --Yes :]No Gov, Town, 'e Planning Board Eyes ❑No subdivision 2/6/90 City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes []No Cita, County Health Department Eyes []No wells S sanitary Other Local Agencies (Suffolk Cntx ■Yes ❑No subdivision Planning Commission) Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑No State Agencies (NYSDEC) Eyes ❑N o Tidal Wetlands Permit Federal Agencies Eyes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 , Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Eyes []No If Yes, indicate decision required: 7-zoning amendment []zoning variance ❑special use permit ■subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan []resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(slof the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? It may be possible to create an add'l lot given present zoning restrictions. (However, thea licas is not interested in pursuing that alternative. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site. N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ■Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/ mile radius of proposed action? R-40; single-family residential 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/. mile? Eyes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 1 .127 acres 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes ■No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ■Yes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ■Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? []Yes WNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Harry G. Hohn by William W. Esseks Date August 10. _1930 Signature WW, W - `' gf '(— &J�ft Title Contract Vendee If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 F t 2---PROJECT IMPACTS AND 1 ^ c.IR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Reid Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? rhe reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples, and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) r a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Moot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ [!]Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Other impacts _ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No 2. Will there be an effect t: ...ry unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ONO ❑YES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) "0 NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ []Yes []No • Other impacts: _ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [--]Yes []No 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ []Yes [--]No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyer' off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No existing body of water to _e extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast :o natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ Eyes [:]No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ []Yes []No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ Eyes []No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Propos-d Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ E]Yes- ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7 Will proposed action affect air quality? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No to industrial use. _ • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0 N IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non endangered species? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nu of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • the proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land (in( cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ El Yes -:]No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain fines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm _ .field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Eyes []No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ❑NO ❑YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes []No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes []No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ❑NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ res [--]No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION i 13. Will Proposed Action affect the p quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? i Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NO OYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By LINO ❑YES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No .IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • ['reposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • 011ier impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ 1-1 Yes El No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infe(tious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑NO within 20)0 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: _...._.—_— ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No -- 10 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change ONO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 617.21 is SEAR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) I Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-'/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-3 3.5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ natural features? • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑' ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(i.e., screened by summer,foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes 11 No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ❑No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *V4 mile 'i mile Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: •1/2 mile Dyes ❑No •1 miles Dyes ❑No •2 miles ❑Yes ❑No •3 miles Dyes ❑No Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by, residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 f. APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: for accordance lundersigned with JAr tele 16ofthe Town Laws and theRules)andnRegailationsl of a subdivision plat in of the Southold To vn Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: L The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) Applicant is contract vendee 2. Tile name of the subdivision is to beMjnor •$Ub (ivis,ion.of Harr A • .Y. .G:E_Janet Hohn 3. The entire land undgr applica ion is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) copies of eeds enclosed 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: as to 001 .000 Liber . . . . 3160 I——.. .... . Pave . . 424 . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. On Liber . ...3.1.63.. .. ........... page . . . .. .. 2.1.1.. .... . . .. . On . . 12/.13/50. ... .. . . . . . ; as to 003.001 Liber . . . . 3.160...,., ,• • Paye 424. . . . . . .. ... On . . .12'106150. ... . ...... ; Liber . .. . 3528.. .. ...... .... . Pave . .. .. . . 529. . . . . . .... On . .fi/.10153.. ... : Liber . .. . 5.161. ... .......... . Page . . . .. .. . . .. .... 492.. .. .. .. ... On . . S./.2162. . . .. . . .. .... : as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . .nqt• app•IiCable .. . . . . or as distributee . .. .. .. .. .. . .... . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .... .. . . .. . .. . ... . ... . . . . 5. The area of the land is . ..2.368 . . . . . ..., acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date he half of reof have been paid except 99 . secortd.. . . . . . . 0 (not yet due) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. The land is encumbered by . .. .qn e. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . mortgage (s) as follows: . .. . , . . , _ • • . • •_• . • • . .• (a) il'[ortI qc recorded in Liber . . .4033. . . . . . . Pa,�c of $. .3000...Q0. .. . unpaid amount $ n . • .. 788 " • in original amount . .unk.nown. . . . . . . held by . Southold. Savings. . . . Bank . . . . . address . .. . Southold... .. . . :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) \tortga gc recorded in Liber . . . . . . ' . . . Parc • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . m on�mal amount of unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . . IB3' It 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . address . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .. .... . . . Page . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . in original amount °{ unpaid amount $ . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . Held by . .. .. ........ .. .... : .. address 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except . . None.. . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . . ......... . .. . . . .. 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts . . . .R-.4.O..Residential.. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . i0. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex. cept . ,,the pond area shown on the maps . .... . . .. .. .. .. .. . ... .. .. ... .. .. . . .. .. 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land N1Xo`4 C(does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. IATame of Dis. trict, if within a District, is • •• •• •. .. .noi.:apRlicable. . . .. ., 13. Water mains will be laid by . , , .op:( spplical�iQ, , and a . .. . . . . . . .. . ... . . . . I . . . . . .. .. .. ... . (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . ..k4ie.eXlsting, if, possible) . . . .. . . . . . . ... ...... .. . . .. .... . . .. .. . . . .. . . .. . . . and a lines. O (no) charge will be made for installing said 15. Gas mains will be installed by . .."t, applicable. • . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installinn . . - . . .. : . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 16. If streets shown oilIi the plat are claimed by the applicant to existing public streets in the Suffolk County IIighway system, annex Schedule "P" hereto, x show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be cto show � Town of Southold Highway system, annex Sell ppl "C" hereto to show same. w Public streets in the IS. There are no existing buildings or structures on the laud which arc not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which division maps heretofore filed• there are no resc��'c striare ps �� Streets trcets on adjoining sub- Fxisting maps at their conjunctions with the proposed stlrects. the end of the streets on said 'Q In the course of these proceedings, the ;ipplic;int will uiicr pr •��5 of the Real Property I_aw. JA rc�uircd 6v Sec. 21. Subrut a cola• of proposed deed for lots shoving � , I )t�)� Schedule "p" all iosteY4(p�'is• covenants. etc. Annex FEB - 7 1990 t 1, Nf �r nCd LIC .•Err I1CLc:cr 1 .OJ.a. . . . . a <., o elan;j :r; •ln;�s6 other vise shq' vn Sellr.du�c ..r.... .�� . ._.. . . . . ., Igh .Harry G. Hohn. (Name p :icanL;' - a°° �tiy G iooz� �!: coi rNTY90 car W N .HUNN - .. - . . _ . . . to Me kr:cl�•n `� f;e tn� t ,i r. .., and l t.:,.ackno`.vled er h_- S : . . hr CAROL A TERMINELLO Notary Public, Stale of New YqkNo. 41-48342:3 Qualified in .;tueens Geunty Somrossion Expim A/ *20. Jp!j ,,,, Nu f, r... NI - . •< .� ,n :,121 t �l f L;"77 .- is e .. .-. . .. . Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - Harry G. S Janet Hohn Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads . (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. ou tru , a ry n - 7 ITT 14-16-4(2/871—Text 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 SEQk Appendix C State Environmental-Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME HARRY G. HOHN inor Subdivision of Harr G.& Janet Hohn 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Southold County Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road Intersections, prominent landmarks,etc.,or provide map) Southwest corner of Nassau Point Road & Aborn Lane, Nassau Point (see attached maps) SCTM No. 1000-118.00-06.00-00.1 .000 & 003.001 (copy :enclosed) 5, IS PROPOSED ACTION: El New ®Expansion ❑Modification/alteration 6. DES RI E, JECT BRIEFL u�ilPRec� proper�y has two dwellings and two detached garages on it at present. Proposed subdivision will create 4 lots, thereby creating only 2 new building lots. Property is zoned for 40,000 sq.ft.lots. Proposed lots range from 1 .127 acres (49,092 sq.ft. ) to 2.545 acres ( 110,860 sq.ft. ), thereby exceeding minimum lot area re uirements. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: _ Initially 7.368 acres Ultimately 7.368 acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? fey Yes ❑No If No,describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? Ity Residential ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Agriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open space ❑Other Describe: Single family residences on individual lots 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL, STAT�EE OR LOCAL)? int Yes ❑No If yes, list agency(s)and permit/approvafs Southold Town Planning Board (for subdivision approval); Suffolk County Planning Commission (for subdivision approval); S. C. Health Dept. (water supply and sewage disposal) 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACT:JN HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑Yes XNo If yes, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes )(No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION;PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: _ H ohn Date: ->Z Signature: It the actio is n the Coastal Area, and you are a state 0.g�'r(�p�a oAl Ire the Coast ssessment Form before proceeding with this!a53essment OVER 1 PART II—ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. ❑Yes ❑No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.67 If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. ❑Yes ❑No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural, archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly. C5. Growth,subsequent development, or related activities likely to be Induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term,cumulative,or other effects not Identified In Cl-05?Explain briefly. C7. Other Impacts(Including changes In use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes,explain briefly PART Ill—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect Identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,Important orotherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) Irreversibility; (e)geographic scope; and(f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments oe reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been Identified and adequately addressed. ❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental Impants AND provide on a3tachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Name of lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible O iter Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature o Preparer(I Brent rom responsi e o icert \ .. . . Date 2 1 1 � meq. a. /_: /� - �� .Yrs • - =y -�� G W ,r Vi CD N T a Q �• O ,•� a" io• Q F - v a PO"Dl 5" N. X. 1W?J1)-Oovonn.d ARnlnet'7rnntor-Ita Corenenl 147 TUIOLANX nrww,..ro u.. .,orrice I L.w-'e1 1811. CA.V. M, Btatetorr porn 0. C1 Lewe el ]0ff1 7Lrr/e fewP uD/.aMrtr,hL//enN,N. --�' , 1RER5161 rx r Made the 23rd day Of April Nineteen Hundred and Sixty-Two ."°Jal`$sevl°flflB DORIS B. MACKINTOSH of 60 Hubbard Road, Weston 93, MBss.achusetts, r �I FEB - 7 1990 _ part y of the flrst part, and r EDA L. McKNIGHT residing at 16 Saddle Ridge Road, Ho-Ho-Kus, New Jersey, (I r� party of the second part, /n,,� �i.UftO,,' dlp.,that the party of the first part, in consideration of TEN - - - - - - - - - - - -- — - - - - - - and 00/100 .Dollar (IP 10.00 1 lawful, money of the United States, and other good and valuable considerations paid by the party of 1Me second part, do ea hereby grant and release unto the part y of the second part, _ her heirs and assigns forever, WX an undivided one-half interest in and to that tract, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Nassau Point , or Little Hog Neck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and desoribed as follows : BEGINNING at ancrste monument set at the interseotion of the curved westerly line of Nassau Point Road with the south— easterly line of Aborn Lane, as shown on a map entitled "Amended Map A of Nassau Point", filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's office as Map No. 156; and running southerly along said curved westerly line of Nassau Point Road about 445 feet to a point which is S. 10 561 w--438.68 feet from the point of beginning, being the northeasterly corner of land of Aborn; thence along said land of Aborn, S- 540 431 W.-about 740 feet to the ordinary high water mark of Peconic Bay; thence northwesterly along said ordinary high water mark of Peconic Bay about 420 feet to land oon veyed by the party of the first part to McKnight by deed dated Nov . 27, 1950 and recorded in Liber 3160 page 424; thence along said land of McKnight , N- 540 421 E.-about 260 feet to the south westerly line of a certain 15 ' foot right of way, as shown on said map; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line of .said right of way about 75 feet to land conveyed by the party of the first parto said said McKnight by deed dated June 30, 1937 and recorded in Liber 1929 page 452; thence along said land, of McKnight S. 54°421 W.-about 10 feet to the shore of a pond; ; thence southerly along said shore about 40 feet to land con- veyed by the party of the first part to said McKnight by deed datedtNov . 279 1950 and recorded in Liber 3160 page 424; thence along said land of McKnight, 3 courses as follows : ( 1) S. 800.,'18' E.-about 170 feet; thence (2) N-54°421 E.-250.G feet ; thence ( 3) N. 350 181 W.-150.0 feet to said southeasterly line of Aborn Lane; thence along said southeasterly line of t Y A161 A i Aborn Lane, N.. 54° 421 E. -400.0 feet to the point of beginning. The aforesaid parcel being and intended to be the same premises conveyed by Mnble L. Bainbridge to Doris B. ' Mackintosh by deed dated May 25, 19530 recorded in the office of the County Clerk of Suffolk County on June 100 1953, in Liber 3528 at page 526. - FSB 7 a ; i F a Yrs. Y ti f i hi k , s� ueEs51Ei1 APAGF494. (10 00 fl with the appurtenances and all the estate and r!Afhts of the part y of the ftrst part in and to said premises, �rll' l�dQ�� tl1B� �>� Upll�lllia the premises herein granted unto the part y Of the second part, her heirs and ae8gns forever. t, 1 FEB - 71990 a-r.loa-e.et.rtenr 4 u7l�e C90uintnmul#Il lit Majoulluafto ` IQarb 6333 Secretary of the Commonwealth Boston, .... ,. ..19.ro. t done In :n any II llrrrbg trrrifg, That at the date, of the attestation hereto annexed, ; Will s , e auoTa ;oat of r: whose name is signed to the attached certificate of acknowledgement, proof or affidavitof the, was at the time of taking the same, a NOTARY PUBLIC for the said Commonwealth lose• duly commissioned and constituted; that to acts and attestations, as such, full f faith and credit are and ought to be given in and out of Court; that as'such Notary Publi-was by law authorized to take depositions, to administer oaths and take acknowledgements of deeds or conveyances of lands, tenements or hereditaments and i other instruments thr//o��''g�h� out the Commonwealth to be recorded according to law; and that I verily believe����signature to �ia annexed attestation to be genuine. l h 4 g %F495 ;. lit Itntiauntg of tuilitll, 1 have hereunto affixed the %rest Otal of tilt UI,fulatnnmraltil mitten. `+ the date above written. - i � �.�) It tx� ESI • Xnt� l ti` Secretary of the Commonwealth t ;., llepulr eeretary hy..= r"" "•""^� •......, 11„11 n1,u,ui �� 1110 4v vtl 4tltl tlgtlltl Iltlt'B Ult described in ,@@n '•who executed the within Instrument and she ecknowledp�tad"•to.:me?that. she executed the same. Notary Public 4i - ) f My Cotmnission expires January 2h , 1968 ., s= : s,tfi r 4 : , l, i mpA eJ FAII 7 THIS INDENTURE, made the , f` day of 4 May, 1953, between MAYBELLE L. BAINBRIDGE, te$ difr at7 W i 57 Union Street, Montclair, New}Jersey, party of the first part, and EDA L. McKNIGHT, residing at Saddle Ridge Road, j IHo-HorKus, New Jersey, party of the second part: - ! WITNESSETH, that the party of the first ' part in consideration of love and affection and as a gift, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second . part, her heirs end assigns forever, an undivided one-half Interest in and to that tract,' piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Nassau Point, or Little Hog Neck, ':in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of Hew'.York,�bounded and described as follows:- I , i BEGINNING at a concrete monument set at the intersection of the curved westerly line of Nassau Point Road with the southeasterly line of Aborn Lane, as shown on a map entitled °Amended Map A of Nassau Point", filed in the Suffolk County Clerk' s office as Map No- '156; and running southerly along said curved westerly line of Nassau PoiOt Road about 445 feet to e point which is S. 1 561W.-438,.60 feet from the point of beginning; being the northeasterly � corner of land gf Aborn; thence along said land 3 of Aborn, S. 54 41W•-about 740 feet to the ordinary high water mark of Peconic Bay; thence northwesterly along said ordinary .high water mark of Peconi Bay about 420 feet to land conveyed by I the partylof the first part to McKnight by deed dated Nov. 2791950 end recorded in Liber 3160 page 424; thence along said land of McKnight, N. G 54 421Er-about 260 feet to the southwesterly line of a certain 15 foot right of way, 'as shown on said mop; thence southeasterly along said feet south- westerly line of said right of way about 75 to land conveyed by the party of the first part to said McKnight by deethence along dated June 30,1937 and re- ' � �'�corded in Liber 1929 Pae 452; g said land of P1cKnif*,ht, S. 54 421W•-about 10"feWto '•' I:-. uc the shore of a pond; thence southerly alone said . shore about 40 feet to land conveyed by the party of the first part to said McKnight by deed dated I ''! Nov. 27,1950 and recorded in Liber 3160 page 424; thence along said land of McKnight, 3 courses, as y. J. . _ u:•.e..,. ,a". _'.•;e. � era• - ^^'"iR1'�� .L.p' 'F s. at; s an follows:o( 1) S.80°181E. -about 170 feet; th e FEB — 7 ( 2) N.54 42'E.-250.0 feet; thence 18,W.-150.0 feet to said southeasterly line f of •' Aborn Lane; thence along said southeasterly line of Aborn Lane, N. 54042'E.•-400.0 feet to the point of beginning. The aforesaid parcel being part of the lands conveyed by Lawrence M. Bainbridge to the party of the first part, by deed dated July 25, 1931, and recorded r- t in the office of the Clerk of Suffolk County on July 27, EF" , 1931, ", Liber 1419 of Deeds, at page 179. , TOGETHER with the qppurtenences and all "s. j the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said:premises. ; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, her heirs and X "'o M' I �M:fir. assignsforever, subject, however, to covenanta, •restrietions , ns liens and encumbrances of record, if any. ' k AND the party of the first part covenants ) 1, to and with the party of the second part, her heirs and 1 �Y h• assigns, that she has not done. or suffered eiything whereby .,1•�,; the said premises h$ve been enounibered in any way whatever. { ) r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the + ?' first part has hereunto set her hand and seal the day and year first above written. In Presence Of: ,Y i a Se N�•' v +yep. k�k� 5 -2- X74 Y :. ):: o .� HARVEY A. ARNOFF �,':� � L. HARRIS Town Attorney =` s Supervisor MATTHEW G. KIERNAN < y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Assistant Town Attorney 0� �� P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 26, 1990 Mr. S Mrs. George A. Burrell 550 Aborn Lane Nassau Point Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Burrell: Your letter of July 14, 1990, to the Planning Board has been referred to me for purposes of response. It is felt that the best way to respond to the question at the end of your letter is that consolidation by the Tax Assessors of one or more parcels in no way effects the Planning and Zoning aspects of those parcels. That is to say, that if a lot is buildable or not or subdividable has no bearing whatsoever on what the Tax Assessors did or will do in the future. I trust the forgoing answers your query. Should you wish to discuss this matter further please contact this office. Very truly yours, �avey A. rnoff Town At orney ' HAA:mis cc: Planning Board - SUBF,L.E' ` ?b fS 550 Aborn Lane, Nassau Point Cutchogue, N. Y. 11935 ( 516 ) 734-5678 July 14, 1990 Planning Board, Town of Southold ¢ � Town Hall /" tvI � Hain Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 Dear Hembers of the Planning Board: We are owners of lots 94 95 96 97 98 10/0 part of 93, as set for on the amended subdivision map of Nassau Point Club Properties, Inc. , as well as various parcels included in our title. Enclosed is a photocopy of a portion of a map furnished by the County of Suffolk Real Property Tax Service Agency showing all of the lots set forth as well as the parcels referred to in conveyances to us and guaranteed by the Title Guarantee Company. As such owners, we and our predecessor in title were taxed by the Town of Southold on individual lots and parcels at the time of our acquisition and thereafter. To assure contiguity of all of the lots and parcels acquired, we had requested a perimeter deed from the prior owner' s estate, and had issued to us a policy of title insurance based on a survey which encompassed all of those lots and parcels. That deed set forth the outer perimeters of the lots described in deeds to the prior owner from whom we acquired title. We also obtained a policy of title insurance insuring those perimeters. In 1982-83 the tax assessors, evidently to minimize their bookkeeping, or the complexity of individual tax bills, consolidated all of the bookkeeping involved into one tax bill covering all of the lots and parcels. Upon inquiry made by us at the assessor' s office at Southold Town Hall we were informed that we were not prejudiced by combining all of the lots in one bill and our rights as owners of the individual lots and parcels were not affected. A written note made on our tax bill file confirms the information given by the assessor at that time that "combining of lots does not result in prejudice insofar as separate lots will remain separate in accordance with the filed map of Nassau Point. " Recently, we have called upon the Town Assessor and upon the Planning Board and have been advised to have this statement reduced to writing and have the same verified by the Planning Board. This reiteration of our rights and interests bec4me_s important by reason of recent developments. i Stl,lJlsi' .6L 1 7 ... .. It is a matter of common knowledge that the water supply on Nassau Point is precarious at best. Much has been written and lectured on that score. The same is true of the waste problem. Any subdivision which further burdens these problems seriously affects the rights and interests of vested owners going back to the original development of Nassau Point. Any such subdivision immediately adjacent to our property could and would affect the availability of those resources. Such a subdivision has been applied for and granting this application would presently affect all of the environmental and health aspects, water and sewage among other, and could foreclose any interests which run with our premises, both presently and in the future. Will you please confirm and verify in writing that the mere consolidation of the individual tax bills does not in any way affect our rights and interests as owners of the individual lots as same existed prior to such consolidation. V r truly yo , i GEORG ELL qIONE. BURRELL Encl. -E SEC III ` Y ' (' 5 C MATCH 7 LINE sour of u,o 15.1 �O O� o ° o ShC/rah( Nee -- - - P ° \ Wunn ewe IO �. 11 rn„ 1.5A(c)- 'o ° ». u.•` ,io' 3 •O ,y'OIJc- Pone — _ I1 � 19.5A(c) rro, °'O /JO.' 1 O 4J `•v, IUVDEa HniE. Uav Dl A •'°' ,,,` _ //yy�� /� p 10 ., A(c) 0., 5 ss c `\\m —Iv /(1t 7140L \"rroi\orr l i ' 0 �? 5 °a � B•\ .e'% `P -o \oy �p t'u N C (.rr p ' 'i. • d``I p4(c) ••„ 6 _ ° fPprt \\y �/ l C-(Qt� ( rYC. IOCC, a n.0 24Alcl ,p• e,°. 1$ Y .. O `eo `� o i.• ,v -°. \ L C �h \\ . 9 � ' J.Z. lcl /3B % Mc .° '- 9 ., o a >iLO 4• * ,, ` '•g ��;� / � 'c°' .. . - SP1°� 6• �` - � � Q /�/2 _°' �. n',�• ° '•• \ o. �EQRGE Ji' YDNG' \ a ;' a 54(c) L0900n ,° 5 5 a \2 "' ° `�V RR LL t °• +,, r'Oh• '� � r.� ® r ag 4/O/ • ^ -Q _ \y .,°• nr' o ,\ P frfu � U 1�(i "1 Q � SJr �j�.I'� � :� j ,`°.�� /1 •� � a \�P,°` \\ �pTS r�QLJDE�1 cRb?(--P,T`( 1Akmnr 4(c) J r°SPf\ r� \�� 'O CEN �� too AND ( n4TBE \ R3 ` ir.,,'�. •� SEE SEC. NO. 133 M4 TOV-71 'N OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT 94 " FORMER OWNER N E ACREAGE ' . r II a u S W TYPE OF BUILDING RES. SEAS. VL FARM COMM. IND. CB. I MISC. LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS Zi`l�j 201 / v d Ji- � r--a.cors 9S;94'-7,P iaa 4 79LJ - f y U AGES L7 B. ILDING CO I RMAL B OW ABOVE Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value ?_ a Tillable 1 Tillable 2 Tillable 3 - — Wcodland - Swampland : , Brushland i z House Plot . Alp, Total -. _`��:r 4 �5 • �� l� �r `) Ste} � + � . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD ;s t23 OWNER STREET VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT 41 �y _ tpR1s�G R `L t w ' JalG POli, r O a CU /-c /A FORMER OWNER N E ACREAGE 34e- S W TYPE OF BUILDING ArA RES. �/U SEAS. VL. FARM comm. IND. CB. I MISC. " ~ LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKSy 0 0 00 a o S, e o X-3 ° 0 9 a o8 1 1S ' I C• 74 At.pr 99 33 26 2yd d A lLr7e ` / to L- 6: ptl Ii,* 60 Bjb� 6�5tj'y�i: e. YN NEW NORMAL BEL W ABOVE Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value Tillable 1 Tillable 2 Tillable, 3 ' Woodland Swampland Brushlond F House PIA-* :ry �p 3K Total �. LA 2 / TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD _3 OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST SUB. LOT 'Co �� U = y� IN CoCU /C'/ FORMER OWNERN E ACR. A iPC E s J3 - D S W TYPE OF BUILDING O S RES. /L SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS M of �+ LOSS 9.3j 1 7 5 g .� CU 0 Sola isr,ro�. 9y 4°"'98riioo a 75 Cn KrC .—�rJ asCR —ion/ To A S -P6KsR. - AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE , FARM Acre Value Per Vclue Acre a Tillable FRONTAGE ON WATER Woodland FRONTAGE ON ROAD Meadowland DEPTH House Plot BULKHEAD Total DOCK :J U P�FIC.,E EssEKS, HEFTER & /ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 106 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS IS 16) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R. ANGEL TELEx-EHCA 6852318 UW P. O. Box 570 TELECOPIER NUMBER(516) 369-2065 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 JANE ANN R. KRATZ JOHN M. WAGNER (516) 726-6633 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY ALAN D. OSHRIN THOMAS F. WHELAN October 18, 1990 OF COUNSEL Planning Board of the Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision Application of Harry C. and Janet Hohn, situate at Nassau Point Dear Members of the Board: I am the attorney for the applicants for the above-referenced minor subdivision, Harry C. Hohn and Janet Hohn. This letter is in response to comments raised by George A. Burrell , a neighbor of the proposed subdivision, both at the public hearing on the sketch plan held in mid-August, 1990, and in a subsequent "memorandum in opposition" dated August 25, 1990. In his memorandum, Mr. Burrell complains of several alleged prior subdivisions of the "Aborn" property shown on filed map nos. 745 and 156, dated, respectively, October, 1919 and August 16, 1922. With the exception of the creation of the parcel now owned by Richard Hurley and Christopher Hurley (Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-118-6-2 ) , these alleged subdivisions all occurred prior to creation of the Southold Town Planning Board by resolution of the Southold Town Board dated April 25, 1955, effective May 1, 1955. (A copy of the April 25, 1955 Town Board Resolution is annexed hereto as Exhibit A) The pre-Planning Board divisions were entirely legal. As to the Hurley parcel, the applicants respectfully request that the Planning Board waive subdivision requirements for that parcel pursuant to SSA106-50 and A106-51 of the Board' s subdivision regulations. The Hurley parcel was created by conveyances from Eda L. McKnight to Charles R. Alexander, Jr. on January 10, 1966 and February 23, 1966. The second such conveyance was a correction deed. (Copies of these conveyances, which are recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk ' s Office at Liber 5898, Page 496 and Liber 5919 , Page 332, are annexed hereto as Exhibit B) EssEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW Planning Board of the Town of Southold October 18, 1990 Page Two When the Hurley parcel was created in 1966, the Town zoning classified the property in an "A" Residential and Agricultural District. The zoning code then in force provided for a minimum lot area of 12, 500 square feet and minimum lot frontage of 100 feet. According to the Town Assessor's records, the Hurley parcel consists of 0. 552 acres. In addition, the deeds creating the Hurley property indicate the frontage of the property along Nassau Point Road to be 120 feet. The Hurley parcel thus exceeded the minimum dimensional requirements of the Town zoning code at the time of its creation. The parcel 's only irregularity was that no formal application was made to subdivide it from the bulk of the McKnight property. Nevertheless, from shortly after the time of the Hurley parcel 's creation, the Town has repeatedly ratified its existence and given at least de facto approval to the subdivision that created it. By a letter to then Building Inspector Howard Terry dated January 15 , 1966, Mr. Alexander, the original owner of the Hurley parcel, announced his purchase of the parcel and inquired as to what "building restrictions" might apply to the property. The Building Inspector responded by letter dated January 17, 1966. Mr. Alexander wrote another letter to the Building Inspector dated February 10, 1966 , announcing his proposed construction plans for the property for the Spring of 1967. By letter dated February 11, 1966, the Building Inspector approved Mr. Alexander ' s proposal to have professional contractors build some of the house and to finish it off himself. The Building Inspector advised that the Town would issue a temporary certificate of occupancy until the building was complete to allow Mr. Alexander to live there and to finish the building himself. (Copies of the foregoing letters are annexed hereto as Exhibit C) Thereafter, over the years, the Town issued several building permits for the Hurley parcel. On September 7, 1967, building permit no. 36062 issued for construction of a new one-family dwelling on the parcel. On August 23, 1968, building permit no. 40032 issued for construction of a new tool shed as an accessory building. On October 6, 1988, building permit no. 0175052 issued to permit a renovation and addition to the existing one-family dwelling. (Copies of the foregoing building permits are annexed hereto as Exhibit D) Certificates of Occupancy were issued by the Town upon completion of each of the foregoing building permits. (Copies of these certificates of occupancy are annexed hereto as Exhibit E) ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW Planning Board of the Town of Southold October 18, 1990 Page Three In addition to the Building Department's consistent treatment of the Hurley parcel as a legal building lot, the Town Assessor' s records reflect that the Town has consistently taxed the parcel , since its creation, as a separate lot. For all the foregoing reasons , I submit that the Planning Board may properly waive its subdivision and public improvement requirements with respect to the Hurley parcel and continue its review of the pending application for subdivision of the balance of the McKnight property under current zoning and subdivision standards. It would be an extraordinary hardship at this late date to require the Hurley parcel, after years of substantial construction on the parcel, to comply strictly with subdivision regulations . Any variation of the subdivision regulations to accommodate the Hurley parcel is not, moreover, adverse to the Town ' s zoning ordinance, since, as stated above, the Hurley parcel exceeded the minimum lot requirements of the zoning code at the time of its creation. Mr. Burrell also objects to a certain course of "143 . 03" feet shown on the subdivision map submitted to the Board. The deed of Eda L. McKnight, the applicant' s contract vendor and the record owner of the subdivision property, includes title to the "ordinary high water mark" of Peconic Bay. (See description to "Parcel One" in deed recorded at Liber 3160 of Conveyances, Page 424 in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office, a copy of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit F) The complained of 143. 03-foot distance was determined by the surveyor from actual fieldwork. The measurement was taken from landward reference points. The high water mark has apparently moved by accretion over time. It is settled law that a waterfront landowner has title to additional lands formed by accretion. See, e.g. , Matter of City of Buffalo, 206 N.Y. 319 , 325 (1912 ) ; and Trustees of the Freeholders and Commonalty of the Town of Southampton v. Heilner, 84 Misc. 2d 318, 329 , 375 N.Y. S. 2d 761, 771-772 (Sup. Ct. , Suffolk Co. 1975 ) . Thus, the 143. 03-foot course shown on the survey is appropriate. There is no attempt to include any lands of Mr. Burrell in the subdivision. The course in question does not affect any of the remaining boundaries of the subject property. With respect to Mr. Burrell 's comments on Aborn Lane, the outer bounds of the subject road are shown on the subdivision plat as straight because the record title discloses the Lane to be of that ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELOR5 AT LAW Planning Board of the Town of Southold October 18, 1990 Page Four form and extent. Moreover, the lands of the proposed subdivision are benefitted by a granted right of way over Aborn Lane for "access and egress" purposes, pursuant to a deed recorded at Liber 978, Page 313. (See copy of deed annexed hereto as Exhibit G) It is well settled that the owner of a right of way for access may improve it in any way suitable for passage. Missionary Society of Salesian Congre! ation v Evrotas, 256 N.Y. 86, 90 (1931 ) ; and Herman v. Roberts, 119 N.Y. 37, 42 (1890 ) . Thus, it is irrelevant to the merits of the subdivision what the current state of improvement of Aborn Lane is. A fee owner of the subdivision property is entitled to make any improvements to Aborn Lane that the Planning Board deems necessary for access purposes. It should also be noted that it is irrelevant if other individuals or families possess rights of passage, in common with the subdivision owner, over Aborn Lane. Owners of a non-exclusive easement cannot exclude another easement holder from use of the easement. In any event, how could others with access rights in Aborn Lane reasonably complain if the owner of the proposed subdivision were to improve the road for better access? This improvement would benefit all concerned. Lastly, Mr. Burrell criticizes the layout and design of the proposed subdivision plan, as well as the effect of supposed additional density created by the subdivision on "natural elements, " such as the Nassau Point water source. In this regard, it should only be observed that the proposed subdivision is to be developed in accordance with Town subdivision design standards, the zoning requirements of the Town's "R-40" zoning district, which encompasses Nassau Point, the standards and requirements of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services regarding water supply and waste disposal , and the regulations of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation regarding wetlands protection and preservation. These various standards and regulations take into full account the special features and limitations of Nassau Point for development. It should also be noted that the increase in density to result from the subdivision is de minimus. There are currently two existing houses, together with accessory garages , on the subdivision property. The subdivision, which will place the existing houses on separate parcels , thus bringing the existing conditions into greater conformity with zoning, will, at most, ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW Planning Board of the Town of Southold October 18, 1990 Page Five result in creation of only two additional residences . I trust that the foregoing satisfies any questions the Board may have after reviewing Mr. Burrell 's oral and written comments on the subdivision. I also enclose, at the request of Melissa Spiro, copies of the following deeds for the properties abutting the subject property (annexed hereto as Exhibit H) : 1. Liber 10174 cp. 506 (rec. 11/21/86 ) ; 2. Liber 9992 cp. 591 (rec. 3/7/86 ) ; 3. Liber 11051 cp. 423 (rec. 4/13/90 ) ; and 4. Liber 7697 cp. 286 (rec. 8/16/74 ) . If the Board requires any further information or submissions, I shall be pleased to supply them. I ask the Board to restore the subdivision application to its calendar for sketch plan approval as soon as possible. Very truly yours, William W. Esseks WWE:pi Encs. ?3� ,E:,T1::G A special and executive meeting of the Southold Town Board was held at the office of Supervisor Norman E. Klipp at Greenport, on Monday, April 25, 1955. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. with the following present: Supervisor Klipp; Justices Tuthill, Albertson, Clark and Demarest; Town Attorney Terry and Town Clerk Booth. The purpose of this meeting was to study the bids submitted for the operation of the Southold Town Beach and the concession stand thereon. After a careful study and a lengthy discussion on the size and type and amount of equipment that will be furnished, numbers of personnel that will be in attendance and what services they will render for the convenience of the public for the operation or the Town Beach arr the concession stand thereon, the following resolution was offered by Justice Tuthill; seconded by Justice Clark: RESOLVED: That Jack Levin be and he hereby is awarded the bid for the operation of the Southold Town Beach and the concession stand thereon. The Town Board feels that his bid is to the best interests of the Town of Southold and the inhabitants thereof. Vote of Town Board: Ayes-Supervisor Klipp; Justices Tuthill, Albertson and Clark. Justice Demarest not voting. RESOLVED: That Chief of Police Otto L. Anrig be instructed to make an inventory of uniforms in the Police Department and ascertain what uniforms the constables are in need of and see that they have adequate uniforms to wear at all times. Vote of Town Board: Ayes-Supervisor Klipp; Ju%tices Tuthill, Albertson, Clark and Demarest. Moved by Justice Clark; seconded by Justice Tuthill: RESOLVED: That, effective May 1, 1955, pursuant to Section 271 of the Town Law of the State of New York, the following citizens and resident taxpayers of the Town of Southold, be and they here- by are appointed a Planning Board of said Town, in the name and style of Planning Board, Town of Southold, with all the powers granted by said Town Law of the State of New York, to hold office for the term stated to wit: Charles F. VanDuzer, for a term of one yeqr expiring April 30, 1956. Serge J. Doyen, Jr. , for a term of two years expiring April 30, 1957. John Wickham, for a term of three years expiring April 30, 1958. Harold R. Reeve , Sr. , for a term of four years , expiring April 30, 1959. Robert W. Gillispie, Jr. , for a term of five years expiring Apr. 30, 1960. RESOLVED: that no action be taken by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, with respect to the appoint- ment of a chairman of said Planning Board, but that the matter of the selection of a chairman thereof be left for the members of the Planning Board. Vote of Town Board: Ayes-Supervisor Klipp; Justices Tuthill, Albertson, Clark and Demarest. AdJournment was at 9:30 P.M. Ralph P. Booth Town clerk S,rdrd N.Y.a.T.U.Fa,m$007•8.61-10M-amp,.and Sao Deed,rA Covemm S.mo G,..,. Am-1.dnid..1 o,Cmpmub.. C0jmMr VOUM LAWN Soon fIONINO TMIs,NfMtAjW—TMH Imt1tummi smouLD el AMID tit LAW"M ewe'. >e �pnp LIBER 5898 PA 466 m a t,K a _ 77I1>!MDENIUM made thelOth day of January nineteen hundred and sixty-aix BBIWMM EDA L. McHI1IGHT, residing at 16 Saddle Ridge Road, Ho-Ho-Kus1 New Jersey, party of the first part, and CHARLES R. ALEXANDER, JR., residing at 257 Aspen Street, Floral Park, Long Island, New York, t ; party of the second part, O 1 YVI ESSEM that the party of the first part, in consideration of One and OOAOO-- rrr.a� ��t + ----------------------------------------------------($1.00) dollars, lawful money of the United States, and other good and valuable conaiderationpald : ..a by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs of CJ !� n successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, 1a A 1� m ALL that certain plot, pine or parcel of land,ihtk)bvttdhhKgm=mt iDCpt7omx=xlbmx7rngu* situate, lying and being$mlme at Nassau Point, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows! BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Nassau Point Road distant 100.37 feet on a course of North 121 22t 10" West from a point thereon where it is intersected by the northerly aide of land now or formorly of Aborn3 running thence South 54° 421 00n West 200 feet; thence North 90 481 00" East 120 feet] thenoe Noijth 541) 421 00" East 200 feet to the easterly side of Nassau Point Road and thence southerly along the easterly side of Nassau Point Road on an irregular curve having a tie line of South 90 48t 0011 West and a length I of 120 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. i i wait A nigh.title and invest, if any,of the patty of the first part m and to any streets and rods shumn the above described premiums to the center lues dsveof, •Qr0CeM with the appurtenaum and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to nm TO "AVY- ASM TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto,the,plutX Qf the second part, the heirs or succe" n and astfgw of the party of the second part forever. 1� r y:- f the of the first party part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything Wbgrby tflR said premises have been incwnbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. # NW the party cf the first part, in c<„nptianu with Section IJ of the Lirn Law, covenants that the party of *4 AM put Will receive the consideration for this Conveyance and will hold the r fight to receive such co, nsid- Potion as a trust fund to be applicrl F.rst or th,-pat prose of paying tire rite i.mprovenent and will apply tftq SUM first is the yxiymnu of the cost of the improvement before using any para of the total of the same for qaj uthet Wrp°fe• t' TW Word t'Pvty` shall! be coustmed as if it rc'+d "'roes, whcnevrr iltr, w:nse of thin indtrdure wcegnires. ixt RMUNWYMERFAW,the paray cf the first part baa duly executed this deed the day and year first above Tia =xra;vtc, os. a.a L, b:c}:nicnt 's 7 �j�F�X JA STATS OP 7t NTT op Co%Lficr su fTATR OP NRW TORR.COUNTY OP Ib On the f p day of V—A M. 19 6(:l before me On the day of 19 , before me � personally came EDA L. MchZIIGriT personally came w to.iUj**a to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the Individual described !H ad *ho eakir"'ifie [ olng instrument, and acknowledged that executed the fo oing instrument, and acknowledged that oho came executedthe ams s Sd1s + ,Notary Publio 1 Of'j�(anaiuoa El w[�».Ia11it` y' p STATt OP NRW TORR,COUNTT OP sr fYATR OP NEW TOM COUNTS b1 .... _. _.—_.__.[alt-. .:. f9nnGw OF IIaTRaT cam,$MM C. C. Ire M...f N d."N,NN bi Th,N.a W.a. I.,b.,n11N, N,Ih. Matt of stattbak < f6, Collier ,_Q(pufttpr ..--_. . Ife.r aret T.Sco * ± .._ ...Clerk of the circuit Court, the same Wag a Mild of Reeord•in and for said dolptfs;do,Nereby certify than ....Tb.QiGJR[.;.Y........P.O�:bEt:.__._...._.-....._..., it and arai at the titniof n'�+!1!iR.t �foregoins.,l..._..AL2sikW.�A.I'e...._ ...------.....:: .........._....-...-._.._...._... • t .: _.. .a..:y:....Jn�As! for, Mid. Ctoami;7S duty dothorked to take ackftdtld• edgmensf and 4flialev 4 sQ,.;a SIM4 dust quetified, anV'�hdt ail Ab olfictal sett N o the are eatftisd to frtf'faitk.•5nd Cr al thg.•sa' iru{rurltent U ea`(cuted bud, dcknaWfedged according ed the laws a� tkt State of "PF�lorida, aMl'1k t I n ature tkewto pufporryts to be is it genuine. IJIIN WItNESS fr . i2CP,ll have h/r'u'to set nU! RBn� and tta! of said Court, tkG_.1Qh. ttf�near ; A D}� ffiatlga re !T-, S cgtte_------------- Clerk Circuit Court: •,ice, i ,� Natgatit anb Pilate IBetb SECTION WIIIIUMNANT AGAINST GRANIOR'S ACTS BLOCK No. S- 5-3�� a JT IAT a COUNTY op. TOWN of Southold IDA L. MatiNIGHT TO CHARLES R. ALEXANDER, SR. „dea llal tBtt1RN aT=AIL sruenss agar tl"bTl1RT'ansIdti1'1d�7�t twwu.�/�s lfa'tLtS�jICX7�7{�i Tf A /nE 1tA7GTEE COMPANY Lefferts Paine Edson, &aqb —y► Southoldt Nev York CM (O ,eel IM He�' f0/R rT ���7/ s s L tI ,T5919 rA'.i.332 - Suny,d . yaT 1, Fmn YY_- M 16,u-6mm,N Uk lkeJ,.nn Goanan,a aa,nu Ganlnr 0 AN—IM IIWd l m Cpmulaa Venal,,la,t) 4�. CONSULT YOUR LAVrTER ERPORE SIONINO THIS INSTRUMENT•THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD II USIO„LAtt/TIt1"Ll THIS INDENTURE, made the day of February nineteen hundred and sixty-Six BETWEEN EDA T.. MCKNIgFT, residing at 16 Saddle Ridge Road, Ho-Ho-Kus, New Jersey, party of the first part,and ., CHARTER R. ATEXANDER, JR. , residing at 257 Aspen Rtreet4 nFloral park, Tone Island , New York. party of the second part, WITNESSETH,that the party of the first part, in consideration of len d-1lars and other valuable eonsidet}tion, paid by the party of the xcond part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part,the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and Improvements thereon erected, Miuste, lying and beingb"be at Nassau point, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as followst- BEOTNNTNG at a point on the westerly side of Nassau point Road distant 100.37 feet northerly on a course of North 12 degrees 22 minutes 10 seconds west from a point thereon where it is inter- sected by the northerly side of land now or formerly of Abornt running thence South 54 degrees 42 minutes 00 seconds West 200 feet; thence North 9 degrees 48 minutes 00 seconds East 120 feett thence North 54 degrees 42 minutes 00 seconds East 200 feet to the westerly side of Nassau point Road; and thence southerly along the westerly side cf Nassau point Road on an irregular curve having a tie line of South 9 degrees 48 minutes 00 seconds West and a length of 120 feet to the point or place of beginning. THIG is a Correction Deed given to correct the description in at , ' deed from the party of the first part hereto to the party of �he second part hereto, dated January 10, 1966 and rec6tdbd in th ., Suffolk County Clerk' s Office in Tiber 5898 cp 496 on danuaily, 21 , 1966. TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and In any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurienanees and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part In and to said premises; TO HAV$ AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns bt the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything' whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such eonsid- cration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same rr any other purpose. The word "party” shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of (his indenture so re.,alres. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN ParSENCE OF: h ' 1*16Z �LS Eda L. McKnight `VgM 1-5319 � 333 'R�11 IIII�NM. tOrMTY 0]• LG.1 !E A •f1 "Ari OF NEW YOWL Coals" OF u1 On'be 10 day of February 1966 ,before me On the day of 19 , before me 1Y� personally came Sda L* McKnight gala e lie ; jOfidual described in and who to me known to be theindividual described in and who grt�� nd cknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that - executed the same. as , i' llMR b ��i19, Ism 1968'•., :r 1 ��talFaiF lgiat Dec. .1966968 I � 1, r•�ur.�e.a�,Rwa t ItCaA.W NOTART MW'a roar C C 3111 Yam fvovnd aN Ir wN by yFa M.a W. a.u.. 4wpa.y aa' Matt of J1001311, Coal ier �outltp,� Not � ' I J• aret_T-e_SCOtt Clerk of the Circuit Court, the same being a Court aJ Ruarit iw aad for said County, do hereby certify that . -ThaIRaP.. V,_..Portet• v _ ........... -- 111 �,t at tke pqe of ngmng the /orcgoing.. ...8C11IlOYr1$ a -}1�u9 Public �t�Tkt:.c3s.�8,tx iflc�te..._. _ ------ ---.in and for raid County, Outy.'authalued io tdkdttiwknowl- /411INIAk acid aj/idaoitr, and commissioned and qualified, and that aU his,•'of(ieW acft',a tub)T'V4Yontitled It ho Jacµ Waif i'rsdit, that the said indrument it executed and acknoryh461d ayypidirig 10 Merkawi of the 'W# o/ F'Orida, and that the signature thereto purporting to be hu q gcnpir{q.', . s.,, - c., 1, I... JN WJjNFJ$ WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto ret my band ok of }n� Cogrt, fho ._�Z4rd IMA. . ... M Coy-i'Niircuit Court. - wX , Deputy Clark. q std! Bute Verb W1Tf1 AR7 IfjGA1NtT G NTOR 5 ALTA SECTION , 4Tl4 1�iY ' BLOCK LOT 4ee TO COUNTYOR 1'ON'N"'i - Recorded at Rn Hone Tinx Dnlnov - CHICAGO 'IIILE INSURANCE COMPANY 116N fM41 flf i1TLE 6NIfl671Tpf Return by Mail to AkNibttied by l ! memo T#T w,AJC' 0103 i LEffERTS P. EDSON, ESQ. R! ! 0�6Wlttip T6T�e16 Main Road IA�Lt>f1+�11tP■ fRA7gAA111Y Southold, New York r /it, Na. I ' RECORDED ' GUAR 3 1996 TORMAN E. KLIPP "1 Clerk of Suffolk County 1 2 ,9? t7'/0-w)..- let; 9 C'S L-Q-- 740 .E;LAUDER J' -57 Aspen 311tot !total Park, R.Y.11901 FORM NO. 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N9 3606 Z Date ...........................8aptalalber..J.., 19... 3 Permission is hereby granted to: ......................o .®. ..Mara..A/......Chas Alen... ............... ..............WAIMICUO............................................ ................................................................................ to .................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................ at premises located at ... ,AAAdl.....(PT...140,Kagh4 ).................................. ..........................................4utohoBulaa..F...X.................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................ pursuant to application dated .....................0911t...........I................ 19-67., and approved by the Building Inspector. Fee $..10.0.00......... . . . .............. Building Inspector FORM NO. 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N4003 Z Date ................... ugust.... 3............ 19.68.. Permission is hereby granted to: Charles :slexander ................................................................................ Ilassau Pt Road ................................................................................ ...............4.L1tchRBade........................................... ed to buil ..re......tool sh..... accessorY..rl..Z.................................................................... .......s ................................................................................................................................................................ at premises located at .......Lot..... .............I�a;ssau Pt„Prop ............ ... .......................................................... ........................ i/S Nassau roint, Road Cutcho�ue P.._. ............................ ............................... ................................... ................................................................................................................................................................ Pursuant to application dated ........................i�ug..........23............... 19.6$..., and approved by the Building Inspector. Fee $5.•.J�............. Building Inspector FORM NO. 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTH-OLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N° 6486 Z Date ........................AD U.......1.6......... 19.23. Permission is hereby granted to: Richa.F.d.. QY........................... .......................................................... Nass....Pt....1U1.....Gutelwgue................. Build an addition on existing dwelling ................................................................................................................................................................ at premises located ot ..W�S P�assAu Pt ;toad ��D11t.,fTon„Mc},'night)„ lair©,,, .. D.4 raQI...M....................Nassau Point .Road. .............Cutcho. ?e � ...................................... . .... .... .......... .. ................................................................................................................................................................. pursuant to application dated April 1.6 , 197 , and approved by the Building Inspector. Fee $.15.n9P........... ...........1..V ....:?................................ ....... Building Inspector \ \ 1 FORM NO. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N2 U 17 5 0 5 Z Date ...�`?.c -.........fie............... �.B Permission is hereby granted to: .0.-m ..... ................... Lt.c. ......c.k). .Z-��, la........... pn .............. ta--�...- ..aGXQC.. l ?.....Q q-CI'+. .... •„ ,.J ,,n ` U .W�o1lY�.r, ....`e�.�r.?4r.�..4-M........................................................................................................T......'.......... ct premises located at .....O... ,io...... /.�1.A .o,a . . ....!W.............��h . ....... ` .. R -....N.. .. ............... .................................................................................. County Tax Map No. 1000 Section .........LN....... Block �D....... Lot No. 4r pursuant to application dated ...... .9 !^�4 ,•, ,••............... 19R..p, and approved by the Building Inspector. Fee $. ..I�.. Building Inspector Rev. 6/30/80 FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No. z. .-GC4. . . . Date . . . . . . Yarjq 3. . .1$. . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19�$. . THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at )�/3, has^att . . .. ... .. •Road• , , Street Map No.1.a57PVV 1. Pse.. . . . . . . Lot No.XRB. . . . . Cut.ahogue,. .2+...X.. . . . . . . conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated . . . . . . . . . . .uept . .E, • • • •, 19.b.7 pursuant to which Building Permit No. .3!QO. Z dated . . . . . hent. . j'. . . . . . . . . ., 19.(,'%., was issued, and conforms to all of the require- ments of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is Private une i .. 1ij. a;t a'-•i? r; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The certificate is issued to =E�� Ale2�.ander • . . . , . , , . • • . . . • • • •�4'I.Ql'. . . . . . . . . . . (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval .�-'Ltra. ..s.y , j�.i . . . ,: .i'... .V311a. . . . , Building Inspector House 7'PP8o tir,.9sau Aoir t lioaki FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No. ..Z,...3r7.p............ Date ..........5®ptembAi...lL................ 19.68.. THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at ...Uj6aaU-•V4DJzt••Road......................... Street Mop No. ...................... Block No. ...................... Lot No. ..Cutchogua.,...Naw...Yoxk...................... conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated ••.........• .Fuqua•t..2.37...••••....•.......... 19..68, pursuant to which Building Permit No. ..A:Q03...Z dated ..........,August...23.6................••••. 19.6$.... was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ........ ......tool..&..e-tor.ag.e...sh®d...(acc®ssory. bu.Llding).......................................................... The certificate is issued to ...Char les..R.....P_lexandP.Y..................................... ............................ (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. Building Inspector FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-17809 Date_ MARCH 1, 1989 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ADDITION & RENOVATION Location of Property 8880 NASSAU POINT ROAD CUTCHOGUE N.Y. House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 118 Block 6 Lot 2 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated OCTOBER 5 1988 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 17505-Z dated OCTOBER 6, 1988 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is RENOVATION & ADDITION TO EXISTING ONE FAMILY DWELLING The certificate is issued to RICHARD & CHRIS HURLEY (owners) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N 060055 -FEBRUARY 27 1989 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED MARCH 1, 1989 - EDWARD SCHILLER Building Inspector Rev. 1/81 ;ACE424 made the .27 day of November, ( . 1p THIS WINTURN ; #{ t x 'z xh G t R.s s..: },etween yAYBBLLE .� • BAINBRID(R<f residing at {�5T Union 3 x ) ' ig5o� tree 'Montclair, Naw �tersey� party of the first part, and t1r.. r� at 412 BtMaburn Road] Ho-Ho-%ve, {F t LA' vbKX1GRT„ roe ng ;)law 14rsey, party of t}►e second pard WiTNESRTHa that the Party of the first part in cneieration of the sum of One Dollar (l1.e0) i lawful mon? dor t United 8teta 6laid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party at the second part her heirs and aeeigns forevers ALL those tko oertain lots# pieces or par of i # ft w Z' Pointy r o Little Hog r Sandi situate t lying and being at NaYaau + I County of Suffolk and Btats ate sold, in the Town of jSoutholdi ip lt, sew Torko bounded and described atl follower r 1 I1� PARCEL ONS t gsCi MING it a point where the ordinary high t i mater mark of Pot say int pseettoo �hoenN �hb7 y r� €€ i line of land aoliveye0, or abbu to f� the party of thY1 first part tb. IkUda g. ffiupmeri said point being 100, feet eosthei' all line of 15-foot I high water Mary¢; from Section' B° est Point Club ' I way shown on pa etc.# filed iri the adfolk County t`, y : + j Propertieet 1nd. l Clerk' s office( running !hones along avid land oon- Ott . reyed or about to be conveyed to ftaudtl s6 eScUt, >` B voN. b400r 1.-1d0 feed more br less to the eouther- ' i ' 1 line of eailt 15-foot 8ay1 thehoe tlaMtAlly along the curved sonthe rly line o sale 15'ropt way 180 P° ) feet, more orless{ thence abtotle a pot►d and along land of the party of the fitit part on a rine rg` parallel with 'the northers line of the yypreslieee Grein described 8. 54e42 �{ef�arY of Peconio t # k € lese, to said ordinary high Bayt thence northerly along said ordinary high water mark 100 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL TYPO a tr line of BEGINNING at a point on the southerly Aborn Lane as shown on a certain sap entitled 61hp i of section B Nassau Point Club Properties, Inc.* ` t etc . , filed in the Suffolk County Clerk' s Officer � r �tr� said point being the northeasterly corner of land �.n m e , s i � x D r r # z 1 t 3r r � o ,-_ r) conveyed by the Party of, the firer Part =� ^r!orge C. McKnight by Deed dated Juna 1937; running thence 41 ng said sjutner : line of Aborn Lane , N40 42 3.-80 . ri K feet; thence along Otho}' land of the party wag >+'r, of the first part, A 00 react as follolin � ! , i (1) at Tight anglea +tp aid southerly line ..=t ji.� of Aborn lane , S. 35Q 1;� 5.-150 .0 feet{ y $f f: thence (2) on a line .parallel witn said s S,� southerly line of Abo,rn`.Lane , 3. 5a a W.- S 250.0 feet; thence (3) ilectin� to the right 450 00' , and runarng N. 80 18' a'. - 170 feet, more or less,` to the shore of a pond; thence northerly {long the shore Of X; $, , ; said pond, 14 feet, Jeor oraless , f the f�rstld land conveyed by the ty part to George C, U2 ht by Deed dated June 30, 1937; thence along said conveyed land 3 courses, as: followsl (1) on a ling _' parallel with the Boutl}Feeterly line of the promisee berain doodri>�ad, S. e0° i8' 5.-150 xp on a line _� . feet, more or 10561 thgnae (2) rallel with the southerly line of the T promises berein deacri�edp N. 540 42' 3. - 17580 feet{ thence (3) jon a line parallel Witt-, the easterly line of the premises herein >, desoTibed, Kv 350 18t N, _ 125.0 feet to the point of beginning, 5 The said two parpels being portions of tt ids t t o the party of tte at ;+ " conveyed by Lawrence X, Ba1Abridge fV' � ' 2 fi,kl part by Dead dated Jaly 5R 1931, and recnried in th f ^y of the clerk of Suffolk'. County on July 27 , L931 , in Liber 1419 of at pagQ 179 "lee ( I ft" TOQIRTBSA with titsappurtenances and all the estate + ' � . and Tights of the party �of; the first part in and to sa.a a &, Ij, r premiseev a . TO UV2 AND TO 'HOLD the premises herein granted '�� unto the party of the second part, her heirs and assigns foTe70T, subject, hoFe'vprf to covenants, restrictions , liens and encumbrances of records if any. i "D the party Qf the first part covenants tc and with the party of the second part , her heirs and sssiq"e , uj t e pt k , t r r f y A Al,, }t I�. i that she has not done or suffered anything thereby the said premises have been encumbered in any May whatever. IN MITNE88 WHIRRHOPil the patty of the first part has hereunto not her hand and seal tie day and year first above written. { i In the Presence of 1 �-t 9TAT8 OF NBT YOMj 1 89.1 s COUNTY OF NNW YORK# ) On the 2 9 day of VIl illte 1950 before As came IRYBSLIS Lis BAINBRIDcak to M klibtu to to the individua, described in and who executed the fdtsgditig ibetrWOntk and acknowledged that she executed the �fjd" ` � a �trr t Caw L x' FIORENCF E ROSS Not." No.60-3364400 0w14i.4 in Wutcb.alw Count' Cert,fiW N.Y.Co.Clk.&Rea.Of(. Term enplwt Motel,W, 1931 State a, Nna York, N 8397 M' Cosmty of Nem York, fs•' I, ARCHIBALD R. AT$ON�Wry SCI�erk of the`SuQttaaggee�, - of Record having by Lw a 0 HEREBY C t'IyT New York Cwmty, t r.. whore name 1s subscribed to the annexedff6davlt, depodtioq certlgrate of wkm.t y.... ��CORDED or proof, was at lythe time ofd nq the tame a NOTed to PUBLIC aa h andhro (h the t..` I. New York, dull commissioned and sworn and commission, or to act ic enof his official 1,., of New is York; that pursuant to law a comm$nlon, or a certificate of h oRrld d.•. � (— and his autograph signature, have been filed in my office; that u each Noor/ was duly authorised by the laws of the State of New York to administer mt}u atd sg,r.,. to receive and certify the acknowledgment or proof of deeds, mortgages,power of tu,,r.. .. DIG other written instmments for lands, tenements and hereditament! to M real la recorded in this $tate, to protest nota and to take and certify af6do band deport...., lJ D It's M that 1 am well acquainted with the handwriting of such No of lout rnm:+r.d fiD FAIL.HES signature on the annexed instrument with his autograph signature Fi FL believe that the signature is germine t fJrK�p-.U`lt��K(aiONTY IN WITNESS W13,�1t_COF, I have hereunto set my hand W aLm a this �� v `'� , f`I'.E PAID ZSf Cl a a rid C! �� Couay n rrk o h Supr1w Cowl,NM js .. ?yew Yeir k;v?nr'.y of :ie Plrst part, �i'nct.AldiF:2'!� C. 11���SI u ��37 Old Slip, Manhattan •o �%h, Cit;,, County and State of Mew York, and LAWRENCE M.AAINBRIDGZ of/45 Erwin ,l -� id, Montclair, New Jersey, parties of the second part, WITW!SSET11 that the party ofd n first part in consideration of One (01.00) dollars,lawful money of the United Sta�, I other good and valuable considerations, paid by the parties of the seeadd part, a� reby g. ant and release unto the parties of the second part, their heirs and usslgns raver. ALL that certaln• piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Nass int, or Little Hog Neck in the town of Southold, Suffolk County, He w'Yark, bounded/)•" scribed as follows;- BRCINNING at'w stone. monumerlt,whiE.�h_is situated at th• corner rmed by the intersection of the westerly side of Nassau Road with the southerly sicW Aborn Lane, as said road and lane are laid out on a survey of said premises made llace R. Halsey, Civil Engineer and Surveyor, May 1919; running thence south 54° e at seven hundred and thirty (730) feet to a point in saidlane, thence still along; t utherly side of said lane as it winds and turns to high water murk in Peconic Bay Lence in a southerly direction and along high water mark of Peconic Bay eight hundr� ,d twenty-one and eight ono-hundredths (821.06) feat, thence n.,rtherly 54° 43' Haut u•ough a stone monument to another stone monument in the westerly side of Nassau rad, said course running a distance of six hundred and forty-five and ninety-eight . indredths (645.981 feet; thence in a northeasterly direction, along the westerly s'. ,^ Haosau Road, to the point or place of beginning. TOGETHER with an easement over issau Road and Aborn Lane for access and egress to and from said premises. TOGETHER Ith all the right , title and interest of the party of the first part in and to the and under water in Peconic Bay, abutting said promisee. Said 4ract of land contain pout eleven acres more or less. SUBJECT, however, to an easement over a strip of and extending flft,en feet in width along and above high .4ater mark, which shall fo art of a common roadway for the benefit 'of all persons owning lands on said Nassau oint, including the grantee herein. AND the parties of the second parti for them elves, their heirs and Assigns, do hereby covenant to and with the party of the fl, art_, its su.:cessors and assigns, that the parti.-e of the second part, their heirs u .saigns, will not at any time erect any houses on said premises costing lees than 'wo Thousand Dollars (92,000.00) each, except the ordinary outhouses. 'he foregoing covenants, restrictions and reservations may be altered or annulled at my time by agreement between the party of the first part and the owner for the time )eing of the premises hereby conveyed, and such agreement shall be effectdal to alts rr annul said covenants, restrictions or reservations without the consent of the owr )f any other or adjacent premises.. TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the est ind rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises. .TO HAVE ANO TO the premises herein granted unto the parties of the second part their heirs and as: forever, subject as aforesaid. AND the party of Lha first pant covenants as follow: WIRST: That the party ot�the first part is seized of the said premises 1n fee simple and has good right to convey the same. SECOND; •That the parties of the second part shall quietly enjoy the said premises. THIRD: That the said ;rromises are free froi Incumbrances. - ROURTH: That the pasty of the first part will execute or procure any f I . ' further necessary assurance of the title to said premises.' FIFTH: that the party of the first part will forever.warrant the title to the said premises. IN W(gNESS WHEREOF the party of the first part has caused tte corporate seal 'to be hereunto affixed and these prasents to be signed by its duly authorizes ufficeru the day and yea; first above written. (L. S.) NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. By WALTER S. JOHNSON, President. City & State of Now York, County of Kings, as; 0n the twenty seventh day jOf May nineteen hundred and nineteen before me came Wqlter 1;. Johnson to me (known who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides 1n the (Borough of Brooklyn, City and State of New' York, that he is the President of Nassau Point Club Properties Inc„ the corporation described in, and whial executed the foregoing instrument; that he knoaa the seal of said corporatil iIthat tl!a seal affixed t,, said instrument is such corporate seal; that it wal so affixed b;, Order of the board of directors of said corporation; and that the signed Lis name thereto by like order. Louie Sherman, Commissioner of dl IClty of New York. Y'!'wTY OV NYW YONY,COUNTY 4Y CINOY.rl—L W1114r Y.1406.C4✓Y Y ly Gw.y W Yw.y W Irwp pyY y{p.YYYr.r j Lwrl 4,rw rYY{Y. Irw cwl.t WPM.r Yrl r Y.Y.O.dY I,.m. :le.t YLoula Sherman {L,nYUN lmwum.Y',YrW Itl4yoY vlWn,vu YI llu Ilnn of lu\iuu�u[.LL ruN rIYN b IM 41tloYb u(pryV,w MY.uwMY. 1 N r OV Car.1 N.. Yw\. Yu.INYo : CwuuW WYw N .waw AW(un4uq 4Lut 1 • 11 u. YwyJ wIW qV 4 u.rl1 wmniyWUW\uy d d I tIn11 eWY lu "( ;^Y.f w Y[\YUYlxynuYYt Y YYY4Y: YYd,41V uY ul;u.:4liun.n Y.Wwur dY.ILL WIIYYY 41 { 4{4Y.un Y u YasuW Yud Wyuvl.JnN .e[wdiuY4b b.44w bY1 {y 1000 lu1 lw i\.IIYYyy.Wlurw. 14.r. Wr.uub..{(YY yad YYd.Iu.N W w.l Y(IW yw fYuuy tL tld_ W GwY,tCi. G, J.v W May Wit. Y. r .YCLLY.CWk. ikucorded 31 May 1919 0 9 A. M. I j � Y (36.00 U. S. I. R. S. CAM. ) 'THIS INDENTURE, made the twenty seventh dayof Uay nineteen hundred and ninet ' BET 4=1 NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPaTIES, INC., a corporation or„aAizcd under th laws of the state Qf New Q��� party of the, firet :.'°' Part and DAISY M..DEL VANSTO: residing utY#14 Glen Side C-6uth'Oru e, 1n the state or New Jersey, ! party of-the second part WITNLSSETH that the party of the first part, in co. islderation of One ('01,00) dollar, lawful money of the'Unitad Statue and othw ; good and valuable considerations, paid by the party of the second part, does - Thereby grunt and release unto °the party of the part her heirs . and use jforever. ALt, that certain piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being ut Nassau Point, Or Little Hog Neck, in the town of Southold, Suffolk County New York. bounded and described as follows; BEGINNING at a point at high we .. u.,oax,nu.Iw,,,s•.a..,...wn..,.,..aut>..a.,.•-.... �.-.s..�,a,,,.w.�sW-r�-.w. . . �.. y.Z� k k' ROraMn rows YatTa1 M0W atarm0 Asa saHelwwr RNeNa as news ow YOIOR W" } IG 19EM 7697 to 286 „ {4 TILL91Nov2r1vM1E,•n.aed 16tn by,.t August ,ai11ewsra hwws4ar a.vplty-four r,,*,'` orrwm BARBARA A1:JRN PECK] `.M. residing at Ino i) Putnam Seigllts z Putnam, Connecticut 06260, pang of the fit pan,and Mf `IO TROMBONE and I1;SE TROMBONE, his wife, residipp et 0 Sutton P acc Sout , ireh�rpQ York, NowYork 1002rn REAL GTAiE "7•' STATE Of it L u^ TRAHSTIRIAX, ,` NEW.YORK a•rt of e n lan.t:.s awtna � 130.70 Irryn!the wcond pan. -. NIITLnSSLTK that the par' oi the first 1-n.to consideration of ONE and 00/100--------------------------------- a ar sr• yM I.w1a1 mnuy•d the t'mtea stag., and other good and valuable consideration, by the pan) of the waotd .n. d:ea he,ehr ,.:X 1 pant std rekax u:.;o the Ary of tie 2,2.11.1 part,lh&.edea a►"',",{5`�/� suemswrs and assiR•is td the Iaaiv of the wcnttd pan for-stew, • ALL that certain plr.t. plea,,r l.amcl of 12111, with the Ivildings-nd hnpro .trm rlenm•rs'ba4+kas44 e E� Nine+to' FsinesICON at cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk.Countya f1eR1i7O¢Rfj'; 5 bounded and described as f�llowst BEGINNING at f monument on the curved westerly line of man am Road ,at the northeas.erly corner of lett 192, as shown on •Amended M4rjF ` of Nassau Point," tiled in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office la Napi'lle- and from said point of beginning running &long sold Lot 992, Booth $4.1 ; _x"' 43' 00" West, 635.00 feet, to the ordinary high water nark of PeOonia )iY, Sayt thence northwesterly along said high water stark 200.02 feet, to'' 1;7— y land now or formerly of McRnightt running thence along said lead OL�`•� •� McKnight North 54. 43' 00" East, 732.16 feat to the westerly line of�`y Nassau Point Road; thence southerly along the westerly line Of Sar.Msltr an Point Road, the tie line of which is South 8. 42' 40" East, 2s3 t2fNfr to the point or place of beginning. ;{ ,: .. jy • • TOGETHER KITH a right-of-way for purposes of ingress and sgrassy,'if, ` . t over th ! southerly portion of the premises immediately adioiniag on tMs► a— ram { � North of premises herein conveyed as shown on survey of Roderick VaA `. art�t p'cs: ?,^ Tuyl, P.C., dated August 9, 1974. SUBJECT to a right-of-way for purposes of .ingress and grass ,} northerly port-ions of the premises conveyed herein In favor bt prasie" yy w =.! i A b � 1 � y r 'r, - 4-4 I TIP � j yYW r r 4 :S is16 y� � i x : r 1771 k I 4 !!07697 ►ct288 `' r 'I!OGCIIM n th+df ngl,•, .,Ir and he to.It try,of itw party of fh ht pan to ad to aq snob awl* rand,.ahuta tt ile airw(Jewrifed literatures to the tenter lines therad. '1 'r th the alTurlen:uces and an the ese,te and rights of thparty of the grrt pan Y and Is t: F said Paramus, '•. ae. TO 14AVC NO Tts W)LD the trend" !ruin g:•aeed aura data patty d the resnd pas4 the htb are^t", ...oaacsson and 'Osiris u the Jeri:? of the seem pari forever. ur M r t It,Sl, a A;' , Y oil M AICD the patty.4 the r,," peri mvea.ntr the he Pony of the first pan him not char a wRnd :5,� wl.erehy the said I:remise hate hre:h itct:mhered In any way whatever, eaotpt as Polo eWK r{{ c AND the party I the firn Jac, in tonf4ianee with Straiten IJ of the lien Law, eoreray thr th!paa.c- Yf tho firn Pon will"A"the eorvideratian for this t eyanee and wrL IIgj the ri&b sonde ood deUidw,�A1 errlian ea a teat h noI to he applied lir+t for the purpose of pa>inr t':e tort of the isnpruvebad - and tsflf the.acme Ent►.t r p',yment d hnot of the impr ann other ovenrent Irlore using ashy pun d th bW d We stay htI"','�� �ZrL— puepov. Thr, word"Port!' ohall he xmx•uedl are if it,tad"panni'whenever the rinsed this i,tdetane w rt'NMaa rPz' w, Dd RTiNfy TAI E EOF.tis Iran.,f the LM Pon lam duly eattvtn{this deed the day and yav pant ahsaa +4i ,onn Minn. "t:'. •. 4�Y TX kAiEAIe LII FECen�:- t7.e•� �� O �fi q w ' it w d' " 'Fi t MORK STAi.o—inew Yoom covenor s uFPoc.K .4 srAn a taw reed wn*a .�+?� '`'r.�. SO fi Oe the 16th day e. August, 19 71, hefm sae On the �. Ply resew BARBARA 11BORN PECKHAM 1�aasf ewes d 19 .Ie1an�.,. 1 b sae 6lafad'fo bathe 6dniLlwl daeribed in and w" b nw km b to use isdisidrl deanl.d Y W tagr�'k r.— ¢feted Ilr.-'re[pnR»m.rm.r n. ami aknewkdsca thu eamund the fo ml inamweat, W sh! ex"Ahed Ilat aM,lee, cawed the rr. "p+ NiP C r f 1 a.onaxe f. -0 K C e0Tat1Y teslas,. ",MMM YM -- Mae-YaRSa Mme 44 10 tf tlaefftff arsosr flr.a as la� Seale OF■ew MM oaypyt as an nae a rete seat,CosmT as aw On the day of 19 . before on, On tl.e day w 19 to w k ly n.la persoally fame ^T� sa mr t he who. 6rir�s by me duly sworn.i d h,foae aid .,me known,who.bring by me d*swag did depend ase - aY flat he reside a n. fay that he asides a No. that he is the that he is the Of Of ttw eewpoetien described «• in and which exeell d the fat, inn imrrument; that k in and Which nes-wed the ( the e lora... the seri of said corporation. Iti: dw teal affixed knows the fel of acid a K duf®eae tell tb i- an aw inatrrmt.fit is rich mrrylntl regi: that it wasp tarpaa Was due Mtn d was 46 j„ '. afxrd by Order of the hoard of dire In-s of aid r aid y rder v' is f.kfi Geste W: dist was May"f�'�•�'— tim. sod that be c a'R° affixed by order t` :he Goad of dhaeon d cid earpss.. •-41 gad 4 name thereto b. idle ertdtr. tion, and that he siped h least t3enb by Me artier K;'u P ,f 4r H y f I� �in sais onto mirN }fir N'ua enae.evr Acuwu Gs nn t.nia M n t feCnon ri° �' nnalfu LS a` BARBARA ARORN PECKHAM MANCrY m low" •,x TO ee�r MARIO TROMBONE i ILSE TROMBONE, sAUG 16 his wife afa.o Mrr.rr atwwwe taftssfs -?serum By was.to, R— r--- r rgCpplar err wr w w rsr sate w ern naawsnws 14'forts P. Edson, n"sie� I Mein Road - a TMA GUAPANT011. !f Southol7, NOW York 11971 altaott alanesr 4w `-��- >y 4YcERTL— .�d�� 1- L ♦1'ie �K1i s l g11•+ — t I d r � Ay)♦ 4 mlmcvli ` A 5 I ^�� I ! / f ♦F t AIA a i r tt r. � ., $ 7 { �'t # no f t, f gt ks fW . a IN v Fs ♦ e+�VY P 7A F F arrv"Itzill (K�o 11:1, 1 UTE. residing at 3!1 3i+ / Si '' r� arit11 s {'ArCit i 6 3 �f d!yy -154 ,h Y{,�"��� .o •v t AiI r ,f ry t'-tai - 1 % 4: I U ♦ y A� ♦ 1.$Y YY � 1"I ond other lawful c(mideratiou. P114 ;,ioi on.Par,Ikit W the wcomol pan Innevot, " r, 4 t. a „ t, HERETO A10M)CPART WIWI;, � ... t M Rk RM rsraq R@ r+ 5�r� F a I CAD Fc f . It 4"r nC! 01 Y 1 4 44 b t � 4 �. >D i t f1t �� t�l 4/ G r ♦ p. r /1 Yi at �i. 1 11 rpr pia,' arm r[rl al la w',ekM Mir%.Ad,,,i was jo4"a Vtaaars Ikrriaa nrnsd, rkrwr, so..tha ld, Suffolk iii"Ity, Naw York, at _ ❑ a, F;11at o Ly. ; c 1!ory Nock, and klnrn and designated an I c': I Lkb:r 101 I ui.'I ont Lr,led •Aoendol slap A of Nassau F° I It 'nl '1vlcf by ,sn..i 1131„!: Club Protc•..:.os, Ir tr T)v7 of „cl I Id, lI[1n' 1 Inc., situate lc w d 1122, 1 Island 111u York• surveyed Ile .• 7 rk and 1 \r• I 71y 1, C.t. • Sur,•. }'or of Cruunport, d - 1 thu of LLN :: County Clark of NU ft; lnty, i�.ki 1 irk, hulust 14, 1" :•, as map Ili6. hn t: I�krtles. ! th a socald lie Its i�n, .,sstc: r. hereC;r part, !'or themselves, their P1 r•• I.f ':he [i r. I,, covenant. t,. and with the FI t, her heirs and :'s signs, that the P.1tl r .[ the c0-11 Part, their belt■ end assigns, will nu' a. ar9 time re I: any bW1s0 on fair, t'rosllssi ns,twil th, t ..tr Pic retia r01 ,I ch" eccaPt the es:9ttng houses, and - ,'� er, i I en I.ses. such dwellings ■P.111 be erected on Thi fI 'eq ui nq c in,, o , 1'eatrIctiehs or •�eservatlons may be PC"fannus !<I at 'Iu[, I sr.y time by agrea,sent between Rassaw Prop. :le' :[nc.. and the olnlvr for the time the r.-- mI co"s'"d hereby„ and sucn agreement y ■Ba.l t alter iul all sk4d covenants,, .'restrictions or vire 4t ",l lag vi . Imt I ner conannt of the n.iner of any adjacent ')Ire till I. ' t V h� , Y 1 +y _ �i ''"b r.l .�'.0 � A,q•.�(y A• ryry txf. kir 17 n )a i � � �v � .� ✓ � ', yY �� S ,.y � .,, y Yi �pW x � y` r a.. -. �� .y'�! ''4 i 1 � �� � b r�Ib � ' t� i yyL�i� d 11.�y^ � Y•� � i I�y' '�10.tf f�.�7 iii, 5e! y KK (F H �'CF'f � y �. °r; '� � �, 4.1� ,� • � t � • •3? G1 � .. b i i �� q 1 � 3 j Y r r f l 1 r fie. 77 y f ifYyl 4 ))1 t ��• i � 1 #: a r d"1 t}.•:3� R i e T It. F It 1, k� i filo„ r •�" , � { 21 l; r1 t l i.tri < • )' i • .J ° fejt ,� 5i r S 14 jF FT >, 7 0. jt b b ! �� �. i 14 day �tv t March 19 90.M.w nR h do yT of DORO7NEA B. CHUTE Ivway cum h !iutnaa m 4 We iedel l dsaetihed is ana who to tax lawn, r be theiiriAttd file a the f d tlmar,, aa•1 adlwlk igW that emm" ttm Ion aft C - deaai6ea r ad aha e+sated the aaa"a�I aad selasa4,daea Ilial HELEN R. MUDLFR •'"`.•' NOTARY PUBLIC CLHt tat•t/ro L. - 101T' COt.;l11SS:UN Tran a aa►swa,Cwttn a .: aT�n a teTtr vea,.cetae"a On thr .Za I+,.xullr day dk !!, ;�i' hrrme mr Ort th, day of t7 brl,re ,. t••mr 4rxvn.alar l0 1, nr ul �r ar _ Irrtr,ally eam t'R Y 1 Ir . rn,Ai•(. an.l M .uhvrilnrtp aitmn M ihr rmr �. that f Ir n.xh at Nq i„ .� /•ti 7 r •Ivnn 1 un lirvmally &, ,u of d. �lw,.g by rith �OHdN-k,' •'% c5 .xrn,dad nR by Jul ttit h. i. tM^ • dryoye anJ ay tht k mile.at No, y I• , SF"' 4'('S•:•t,N F that he tmotca in arxf,loch ra,wM thtr 1 •thr evr•Pnratinn d.u ribrd 4n•,.v. the .al of myl a,rrr r irm:rthatunl,w, that he —. Itw .e4 aRsed d."bed in and vrlat ettetttted the m be the ittdnidt'i M aai.l imlrurmnl i. .tx-h rnry..ra:r val; thin ,1 -rat r, 1h, l,rea,itta itINNInem; attiar.l by ,.nhr w if, I.ur.l .I dirrvtora sal .aid he, said subNTihitta lif,etl, era present and as ton, and Na hl' "I'll h rumr tberno by i1e�. at the ta,a eaacma the aM4;aaJ am be.said erkm k time wbucibed h treats u shwa Ittaeta, — T M�' Ir. District 1000 Irapa awl Mit #teb K ew r,.vixwr Ar.ar..i ,a•hr. ,A, ,, ,chum IIB Tin a No Rmic 5 S? _. wt 5 G DOROTHEA B. CHUTE COUNTY ea TMN SUFFOLK fAX Oil LING AnBRF%5 10 ROY A. 5rH11Dl Ia.wrAttnNrrts tra,....fwaaN laOY R YAL 1!a _ tx-••�-�. i Gary=Esq.P. 0TfC� CoiclGUARANTEE e -tr~ a ti A Uvl Y.7 ea 6 tl 'rti s r h e°'wa VOWLAWN@waw.rwn nv enm,rw arwu as aem w tae. LBLr rilu 591 PLWE DO NOT PUBUSH 6 115 T O y" .rade as 27th dry d February Y .eleow badred rad EIgI1L six t •; ' .' ,al't� KT1-= CH1.4LES GRAHAM KISKADDON and REV. JEAN L. e1SKAD00N, lits wl fe, � € . 350 Aborn Lane, Nassau Pant, New York 1!935. ,i ffi yrry wt tL Pct rad CMEACE C, GRIMES, residing at IIa Har+pton Road, y WE iy # y l Gave" Clty- Ntr York .153f " I A L L'STA TE' MAN y 1W a` xr Isla '' 1% 1 PWY of 6e Irv/Ire. 1711ANSi'ER TAIL . "MMUK drat .V Arty of the Ant Pm.4 mrrideraYaa d �. C[rUNTj z TEN dollrti mo.ey 0 "Vi6id Smm and other lawful consideration - Few ,a`' by rk prty of a a uvM wt.don bmby pr,t and nice vm 6e pry d Ike Noma Ian.de Mn w fF a "Om""and as"d the pry d diereeed Pen forever, _ f t Ali.t6a cmLi p1m Pit n pmol at bm4.b6 d.ba7dbrar eed ' . t vPearera 16reea aretarL rinser 1 `a �•bft k0r at Nassau Point, or Little Suf•olk County, Ne York known as Lot 99 on Aronace Neck, npthe Tarn of Southold i" owned Or Da;' r Point Cn,b prop^rites Inc. g D Of Nassau Point s Loan Island, Y. sacroVan situate In the Torii of SOuth0ld. �, _ "'Y' On Jun 'S' 1922 encafDiMtln the OfftuelMCthe CountyE. and rClerk�in SuffPO olk — Y. on August 16, 192_ file No. 156, I All that part of Nassav Vont (fOrowrl �- fi mmW i , b�trrl .n in' t-,wo u( Y Little Hog Neck) situate, lying and desc Ww,1 ,ontnnin, County of S,.ffelk, Sate of Y n9 and j `s /ol Net cork, bounded _ xMAP BEGINNING at a point :in the high wa,er line of Lot 112 as sham on a Clfteln r owwroDertles�tncdatedMJ me Of Nassau Point owned Dy Nassau Point Club ENEWL Office August 16, 1922 in File 1922 and flied to tM Suffolk County Clerk's - — 118,w 'Do as Shorn to said mg); ile Np, 156 es the sa cheasterly corner of lot No. rd, 5.00 r nning through said la;onn two courses as follows: [.")6.000 1 Orth 25. 30' East 85 '"t; 21 Thence 252 zc' East 90 feet to the and 101; high water eyrk between Lots Nos. at the dtvltl,e Ilse 99 1 Thence westerly along said nigh water mark and nd along No. 99 to the point of Subject to mo-tgage dared September 1, 1978 recorded September 8, 1978 _ ^, between David J. R:cent . and Delia 1, Ricerete e T end kl;eyrre G. Goggin, hl; if. of mortgagees1. 1mortgagors and Rldvan r. wrant mortgage has a remtl'Afig Principal Dance of ,S�Llber Go9e 9 ees hereby agree •"o ass Page 113 atJ nay together wolf IntereBWv"ich the •t from February 5. The orantorr herein are the sate kerscns as the grantees In � 1. 1rrt recorded Jao..arr 2J, I )5/ rr. Liber yl 9g Pe Oreo dated Janr•ry r t^t"' The ritnln doscrine' real 'm 205 "t !ncvnb"ed hY a credit lin. a0rtnag.. ,„ �tc999r na592 i I wea a VOL it*said iarn4 1f aq,d tae party d ttit iwt Nee i eV tr w/rats aN y •„' tri Am"a.Am&WA-4 rresi.r n at NEW Sosse a"nc �! 3 ` T Gcnma with at aprwtm ani awe all tht mate and rapes of M Very d 4 Am Nat is lead as a TO XAVR AM TO HOW tam r : Aawir maria drnl d rife tae pry d ae no wd jaw t4 belles r = r .& atcmn 's'7 amus d 'hr pvy d the"Cowl pass*- .C' f r ail r = t< aur a� e G {,1 l t AND d .my Of as fim prut. :m wnpwne with SCt a 17 of t`w I iso Law,minima gat the prry d {If1 r1 1 +r Cw firr pan wig tartare the caoick�adoe for if,::cor:.cyance nil will hold the rl - tht to reMve.ucn corriA� trop Ionil to 4 applied firs;for the rtrpme Of pay*the amt Of the iuQrarenea;and will apply } Y }, the carne Rap to the lwyewM d the rop�I rye import.meat More:u'i any part of the total of III, w.,w for f ..14 1 ! s%othv purpo"p"" +e- �. [ Y r• The ward 1. p�1' +� he a,ruvd as it it rM " run" wlt�erer the C-te of this itdennve w rcirca. eq ON gRHf 'S NpHPREOr, the party of the nr•t van !aa ddy eaecatel this Ceae 1e day and ,,ar firm r Z akar.waiKa * ' Te mfmw"or. n St �,d ,:A-1TIl,�✓>��/��' ,_� CHARLES AN KISKADDDN ` REYel EAN L. KISKAODON 1 i SAP 11C^ (;. " 1T 7�7- R - ..�".+JL '!A✓y. .,: At''kA .� ..ssxW, r+yA`F'; ' ✓ ..A* rTY T"P'�rPr Jri°Y�l j �"-^ ,.tam,.as3iu•c�5�itiw�•rti i°F+Ea i 'y( :WFIrr,6lk, ,-s ir�t-t ➢ l6 tJ 192 .t.,E •J tlAw O Ar MMR l'OORT M .J : JLY Oi,CAter'Y M r k 4t t> 1 On fha 27!1! drd moor pl•v 19!a, .-ve vie Oo the ?i 14 da d t ..` n b It. pnSo" cone 1 1 3��r 19:i5 wore w �.. FF permaUx amr te ' CHndL Lh GHA.F'gN, KI iKpUUl1Y b ;! 1h IiK':�UUN cu i c. .Il Ives i}4ari b w dewt is be th• nShcxidrsl rSmIM o a-.! xhn to nr 1nnwre d oe fir indlwtdyl dtaviMd nand who '✓. .l ! taavted that Iagoiq i101r+mrnt, n-1 a<Lro I. u Jut um'ed Nr fnnytdrt b,.•Yruet tt !M kfsed { ?li+ taaeuted Iie sture d tilted that "+t 5 r.easvte the ono I I fe��"; �1Rtrwrn N.vtwle I- Npt; Ohl I::-- •� �K PIMItt "IfF 'Y In 'Tn,! - t...� 1 tW.. t. �mtm 30,1 �tl iron, tt•M*ro n1q d P Pe sw_ w Ise I., n lq ^a:f7 ."rl a NI ✓ "AM M OaM�CtuV1 M r $TAM Iss MMS,TOM ,.� On slut Personally owase on.he @,y Of 19 . bd.w 4A'4 t Pte. - m me keowa•-bo,1-."l by w dntr 1, -w,did dq ..� .nil 1 pe•ram+tlY ome ' 04. �ye.7 Int he naidem a1 N'. the hal I amd1.R rntnesa b fM MM'{eg UOtlm+en4 x+W Vit. 1 c w Pell MU7 arq,nShtsd, wlw, 6eirR Ir me dull r ; Ont he is the S.M.did drouS: and o7 Iw' be r yi ky at of f that he Im ss, tion the 1 io and rhidS esamed the bRo-9 6 •am•rt th E• ' . �tht OW d nal rop.Sntion 11 i that ✓tl .tA I dewnbed in and vbo Bean rA the ;'n he that tedividai .: w IaSvtmtnr it tush oorpo V11; ,at R ,.V w that he, old I-h twta,sg vr�nna; w 1W used b� ard, d the NmH d dt n: . d .tea e.a_ - beet w tate, •mg -. MISS.and that be tgeed b all 1. r_rve the o.ve;+ed tlat he�Its, wjtme". .'ho hr IiL �'-r. I at the uex nme u3bacribe�t ' Pi"EASE01 VUTPUBUSH waW■ ala *ale meta """ ¢rt MIRr* •.e„ Tread NO n�l r —��.". '7 un ' I,I:KFCOfIN sTa11�t!ills 1.,(A1111.1. .a l•naY• Tr) l,♦tiNES .n .,aelnn ...11n.lm inn,.n..r. +m.n g ateltltt sty Wit'1ST. Tnu*mLwLuCE ',AMP, J. Nm [ha, Es(l. Ole•.•wit.Aa 25 Lldor Cit) :lace •6 (42nd !itrlret At Unittd Nations) �! taSaat t —•--�_. _ Nrw I crk, N• , - _•�. 11017' 4 +ts1, a = aE 10 r Y , t ,I '•4 ,rf r, � �� �� �r � �t C -.a: Y ;y sl' t• i„�,Ya air • t+i try { S,ar IUa•.r :l 1 ` e` 't; *a 1 l eYr '� ,,. .I � Ct �: 1�_a �•��4p. G �)TAI �'l' R ' �_. -. taeie♦�etla uart�tmrre�taewN LIG �••n r,xir ••• .w..w._.tr.s.r t+.� � w w, w aalT�lsle—�sV'Isl1�. ��IMi��MNV�7 WILY k i 10174 i:506 15 BIOf1rIL" wale the ^. it dyst Ncve.tber .alaeeets>•arM ad eighty-six �, }�• h&?VMEN George A. Burrell and Ione E. Burrell, his wife, os r tenants in eoRMOn and not as tv"ants by the entirety, residing ,J at 9960 So. Highway AIA, Jensen Beach, rlorida 33457 u - r i 5 1 Pa"f°f d"'Winn Pet rl Galaul-epi Aasociatee, a partne 'i kborn Lane, Nassau Point, Cutchogue, Ny 11935 rship, of 550 . PWY of the Nod Pam %VM ZS7731y thw the Pmy of dw 6.-et Pen,ht taseidnation of _ Ten jSIr.0n) ell h.1d man"of the Usilal Stam = Peal by the Pan?of the sawal pan,don hereby tm+he,rdmw ted qukdaim awn the play d Ike ensld Pa+t. d.F a me heir,o,asuuw,n est z"_u al the WI pv7 at ds wtasd ALL th.t, •pis Plat.Viae sr Wal of hM.wits the lm3d^P ass aprsemesn law As eeenad, littwte, at' And y5dta of qew Nas-au roint, Town of Sout old, County of Snf fclk lnr&, shown and designated on Map of Proposed j . Subdivision, Section p, ?!assau Print Club rr;;•erties, Inc., filed in :he office of the Clerk of .. 'e County of F•affolk on October 4, 1919 ' as Map NO, 715; Amended Ma Properties, Inc., tiled it pthoofflceSc,tiof thaRassau Point Club e t Suffolk on October 21, 1920 as Map No, 753; �naed flaphA of YNessau Point, filed in the office of the Clerk o[ August 15, 1922 as Mt e County of Suffolk on ao NO 156 and /upended Map B of Sectl�n B, NessaY °�`,, ,•r-r Point Cluh Properties, Inc., file in the Of..eice of the Clerk of the (County of Suffolk on Ser described as foil�ws: �� r i6, 1921 as Map No. 789, bounded .nnd BEGINNING ata point o„ the northwesterly side of Aborn Lane, distant 422 neer southwesterly, when measured sling the northwerterly -ide of Aborn Lane, frorr the corner formed by the intersection of the north- _ ,p tresterly side Of Aborn Lane with the westerly side Of Nassau Point .� RoarOtd; saiu point o� 1 =ginning also helny where the southwesterly side •� we ter 99, ae shown on the awve me rtiorxd saes, intersects the north- - sterly side of Ahorn Lane? RU7MTNG THENCE South ;4 degrees 42 minutes 00 seco.,de West, along the emithweater7.y aide JrAt:,rn Lane, 31:.00 feet t0 the southwesterly extremity of Aborn Lane; H7]7CP. south 35 degrees is minutes 00 s _ southwesterly extremity of Morn Lane, 25.0022featt, along the .t..i� fo.merly of Mr,Bnight; ped now or t 23 T _ i 4 TRANSFER TAX x, SuuF..OL c ,tlnued.... t,.{, YAA`S. .� ........ . �t 0, �� i' IRV4 �X107 y ,r -rlu�r,t THENCE along said last mentioned Ian#, the fo}1[ .jnq brae (3) courses and distances; ! v , .( rU_Y South 54 degrees 42 minutes o0 Seconds West, 7.00 feet to a . ` - - point; (2) Westerly along the ecrved northerly line of land now or " +a. formerly if Ncrnight as shown on the abovementione• mals, a t1A liar course and distance of Nortl. 01 degrees 23 minutes 00 accords w at, 247.30 feet to a point; e (3) South 54 de^rees 42 minutes 00 rsaonds West, 130.00 feet to the high water mark of Peconic Bay• TB.7NCE along the highwater mark of Peconic say, the following two - (2) tie courses: and distances: C (1) ?. rth 48 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds west, 251,16 feet to a point; 12) North 60 degrees 23 minutes 40 secom .• hest, 30.00 feet to the northwesterly bulkhead of a canal; - `) t :;ENCE North 29 degrees 36 minutes 20 seconds East, ale ng the nortirvsterly bulkhead of said canal, and pard!• along Lot 108, es sl vwt c1 the abov ssentioned maps, 177 feet to . Point on the chore line a toe lagoon, as shown ort the abeLementioned map., _ THENCE in a nen- y ion the abrl direction a_s, the shore line of tie + • r. -. lagoon, as ll,showi1 on the abovementioned ceps, :u;d along Lots 100, s )09, 110, 111, .L12 and 11J, as shown on V'-s abovesentioned maps to `* the southerly sale of the bridge which crosses the lagoon at Bridge Lane; - ,R adE2)C% Nurtheast.erly, along the southerly side of said bridge to "apoint on the northerly side of the lagoon at the southwesterly Y corn^c of Flot :' as shown on Map No. 7", Abrvementioned: i I A : T;ENCE Easterly along the shore L}ae of :he lagwn and along Plot C as shown on said Yap 6o. 789 and continuing along the shore line < - q• lj o:r the lagoon in a genera. southerly direction and along Lots 121, ,. 1:!0, 119, 118, 111, and 107, 10E, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101 and 99 on the abovcmentioned mats, to a point where the d'vlsion line botwcen I<'cs 19 and 100 intersects the lagoon as s) ovn on the abwementioned �C TICNCE South 44 degrees 42 minutes 00 seconds Wnst, mentioned divlsiu.r lire, 100 feet to a point; along said Last rfi ENCF, South 35 degrees 18 minutes 00 set:or•ls East, along the scutywesterly si(le of said Lot 99 on the AbOvemertioned maps, 240,00 l feet to the northwesterly side Of Abo;n Of BEGINNING" Lane, at the point or pi co It being _nttnded, that this conveyance includes all cf the premises W4 Owned by the ESTATE OF CHARLES NAIMEB on Nassau Point and the grtntors ,,!rein. z b C. �. i r ..�, :dire � .. _ _ ,_C �.; ,.. _ #.'.. . _ _ �.x; :. 'as.._ �'_ .. _. . '"<'�•�,�,��'�'�� �yy f 4 ' � {r r by s r s rr �• ttif„£ kyr �,� Y FILE W a'h zr V t 4 • .. ra i f µf r � ' n a qq y a . h , • ' w•P'7' ,r f t"Wf ♦:$`' �', t,' a it 3 +Tl� w 0,0, f� P , . /�%\6 � | \ � � � . . . � . . . . . . • \e + . . . . . . . . . . . . w > «. . •» ) w y>}a. dfl �J ) tilt �«af . f > w / . � . 4 - « , . . � . « • : � : � , ell : ,/ TO: File FROM: Melissa Spiro, Planning Staff RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision Harry and Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1, 3 . 1 DATE: August 29, 1991 At the request of John Wagner and Mr. Hohn, a meeting was held on August 23, 1991, with members of the Planning Board. Present at the meeting were: Richard Ward, Planning Board Member Mark McDonald, Planning Board Member Melissa Spiro, Planning Staff Matt Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney John Wagner, Attorney for Applicant Harry Hohn, Applicant The Planning Board had requested that Lot #1 be restricted to use either the adjacent existing driveway on the Trombone property, or to create a common driveway with Lot #2 with access to Aborn Lane. Mr. Hohn voiced his concerns in regard to the • restrictions for the driveway for Lot #1. He felt that neighborly disputes could restrict any improvements he wished to make to the existing driveway, in particular, the clearing of noxious vines. In addition, Mr. Trombone had already expressed in a letter that he would not allow any trucks to access Mr. Hohns property via the existing driveway. The members of the Planning Board suggested that Mr. Hohn submit a plan showing a driveway for Lot #1, with direct access onto Nassau Point Road, and to allow Lot #2 to have access over this driveway. In this manner, only one new driveway will be constructed. Mr. Hohn also requested clarification of the building envelope areas and restrictions for the conservation easement. The Planning Board members explained how they wished to limit areas of development by using building envelopes, and that the intent was not just to show the setbacks allowed by the code. Mr. Hohn will submit, for the Board' s review, revised maps showing the driveway for Lot #1 and restricted building envelopes for all lots. In addition, he will submit the wording he suggested for the conservation easement. • cf) ---- • 4a � r 146 • etr- T ✓K / • • • ' deog000 4-f r ze- i i Il • ems. �l • '� �-. 8'��S 9i ..�� Gileri�e 004 S • � i • F1 U G— 1 4 - 9 1 W E D 1 1 �y 3 � 11 LAWRENCE N WEISS$ Il (�> . ..• A7TIjRNEY A7.4AW ( } l it c,,i �1J� I� Cct 964 THIRD AVENUE J us� 7 3 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 1bQ22 °� 1 ` s (2 12) 69137 11.49 (V FAX (111)751=4994 - Auqust' 14 1941 Mr. Harry G, Hohn, Chairman and CE6 New York Life Insurance 'Co 51 Madison Avenue '+ VXA `J'AX - ' 576-6794 (xt 5077) New York, New York , PERSONAI! AND C6NFIDENIPIAL Dear :Mr. Hohn. z . Mr. Trombone; ha> refe> red to me' your fak letter of today's date: �. I am pleased to800mplj► with yquX icquest for a copy of r Mr. Trombohels let9outbrOold P� nq �oard, which fo11o1Js. My clients sJoul�l prefer to iir`raiI 66. for a landscaper of th61.r own. choice to res o're tt}eir piopOkty:. Naturally, as the i'efolia " be ubmitted ou ill J I I not _ of it lib a know his s s?l,tiafactory to out *, ; Masi I also plaage hay.4 .your .A6sbtitwe that trucks and other large Vehicldk of;..tha g rt0 desgxibed in paragraph desig- nated "2", of my.• letter .4f. AugOst 13.';wili. not cross my clients' P;pperty._ z. z 1 Vek ruly/yours, laW> r?pce N. Weiss LNW:ms �; 4 Oct .Mr. :and Mrs Mario Trombone . it t. 8_ LAWRENCE N. WEISS, P.C. ATTORNEY AT LAW .' 964 THIRD AVENUE �7nn NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022 (212) 686-1148 FAX (212) 7S1-4984 AUG 1 1991 _ August 13, 1991 L`s,. pFF10E CF t.9'1.'V�i;.S�rti h�nt7 Mr. Harry G.Hohn, Chariman and CEO VIA FAX -- 576-8355 New York Life Insurance Co. 51 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10010 PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL Dear Mr. Hohn: I represent Mr. and Mrs . Mario Trombone, who have asked me to get in touch with you to arrange for the restoration of the status quo ante your construction on the property abutting the Trombones ' property in Cutchogue . There are two issues which must be resolved urgently: 1 . The foliage which you contractor uprooted from my clients ' land must be replaced with equivalent plants and shrubs well before the end of the growing season. 2 . Perhaps even more pressing is the need for you to make altert}-."� ------psganta for access n �s^"��par� for the ten--aaad-1 :w1ie, ou told the rombones will traverse their popery-. The Basemen -esery--e,, your property for access over my clients ' and does not extend to such vehicles , which I under- tand have wheel bases wider than the reserved easement. y clients ' land would be seriously traumatized every ime one of these industrial vehicles crosses it. Would you please get in touch with me as soon as possible to discuss the arrangements you will make to correct these problems . The Trombones try tobe non-con ei hbors , and I Know you have had amicable discussions with them a ou these matters . This letter does not signal a less friendly attitude on my clients ' part, only the recognition of a need for more urgent action. • Mr.' Harry G. Hohn -2- August 13 , 1991 . Please bear in mind that the Trombones have already lost the enjoyment of their summer home for this season. Please do not ask them to suffer any further damages or inconvenience. Ver truly yours , l: Lawrence N. Weiss LNW:ms cc : Mr. and Mrs . Mario Trombone • • New York Life Insurance Company • 51 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010 212 576-5077 Fax: 212 576-4545 Harry G.Hohn Chairman of the Board SENT VIA FAX # - 212-684-6383 fi� August 14 , 1991 Mr. Mario Trombone President Trombone Associates, Inc. 450 Park Avenue South New York, New York 10016 Dear Mario: I understand that you sent some type of a communication to the Southold Planning Board concerning our respective properties. I would greatly appreciate receiving today a FAX copy of any such communication. As you and I have discussed several times over the last few months, you have my word on the basic principle that I would respect your perspective as to the properties, and if • anything was disturbed, I would take full responsibility for improving both of our properties, particularly to your standards. This includes the installation of a row of evergreens of your choice around your rose garden plus the replacement of rose bushes that may have been inadvertently disturbed. I communicated this again personally to Ilse on Sunday afternoon, August 4, at your place and suggested to her that you and I continue that conversation later that day when you returned. The same message was communicated to Ilse last Saturday, August 10, by Ed Dieffenbach and I discussed the matter again with Ilse by phone on Monday evenng, August 12 . Sc ly, • ` M vv1S C- 550 Aborn Lane Nassau Point Cutchogue, N. Y. 11935 (516 ) 734-5678 August 26. 1991 Re: Proposed subdivision SCTH 1000-118-6-1, 3. 1 by Harry G. and Janet Hohn Nr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board AU` Main Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 Dear Hr. Orlowski: As a result of my discussion with Hs. Melissa Spiro of your office concerning my letter of August 16, 1991, I am reiterating my concerns expressed therein for the record. A major concern is that on the evening of September 9, 1991, the date set for a "final" hearing, I will be met by documentation and approvals by various agencies without having an opportunity to examine and perhaps even object to such "final" approvals. Certainly letters written to this Board seem to indicate a "fait accompli" subject only to the ability of the applicant to get his papers before the Board up to the hearing date of September 9, 1991. In the event the applicant fails to do so, the applicant will graciously extend the Board' s time to act. No consideration is given to the prospect that there may be objections. It would appear that there has been D.E.C. approval. To what extent is not known or reflected in any file that I have seen. The final Health Department approval was evidently obtained from the Board of Review of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services despite inadequacy of minimum requirements after I was informed that the review process was being transferred either to the Planning Board or to the Trustees. I referred to that both in my letter to Hr. Lindley of June 10, 1991 and my letter to the Planning Board of August 16, 1991. I hasten to add that I may have misinterpreted the information supplied to me since I am not and do not intend to attribute bad faith to any person in any agency that I have been in contact with concerning this subdivision. Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman August Town of Southold Planning Board Another difficulty is with the sketches or site plans submitted thus far. As I noted in my letter to the Planning Board dated January 21 , 1991 , there are lines drawn which are distinctly on my property with designations and characterizations which are seemingly within the resubdivision with the possible inference that approval by the Planning Board will lend authenticity to such portions which are outside the subdivision. For example : Aborn Lane is shown as a private road, but certain lines drawn intrude on my property. There are other inconsistencies such as a vast difference between the recorded deeds and the proposed "Description of Property" which is marked as Schedule "A" . Any new sketch plan or final map certainly should be studied before final approval, and corrections made if need be . I fail to see why any portion of my property is included on the subdivision map. If there is any dispute, it should be resolved legally in Court rather than determined by the Southold Planning Board. I have serious objection to the proposed "Declaration of Restrictions" . In the first place , the applicant should be made a party. There should be delineation and defined restriction on grading and clearing. (Already neighbors on both sides have objected to applicant ' s random destruction of trees and plants without any authority for such actions . ) I have not noted any area designated as a "Conservation Easement" . There is evidently a restriction regarding water pumping capacity, but that does not appear in the Declaration of Restrictions, although that is a very important element in the matter; so important that I believe that there should be certification by the supplier of compliance with such restrictions. All of the above and more are concerns which I and my neighbors adjoining this subdivision would like to address in a reasonable period of time following the complete and final submission by the applicant. We ask the Board for such an opportunity. gOR tfully itted, ELL 4i -'S-TYPE. R SONS TEL : 516-29IV 79 Aug 14 ,91 �37 No .002 P .02 A S S 0 C I A T E S. I N C. A D V E R 71 S I N G P U B L I C R E L A T I O N S K E 7 1 N G August 12, 1991 a`' l NYSD1rC Regulatory Affairs Surly Building 40 Stony Brook, NY 11794 Rl;: Destruction of trees, plants an other wetland area to the property of `Trombone, 91$0 Nassau Poln Road, Cutcitofiuc, NX 11935 Gentlemen: • I understand the owner or occupant of remises immediately to the north of my property has been and is now and growth and otherwise destroying the contour of the beautiful and en.Area,Tn doing so,he has come upon my land and has already destroyed all foliage and plantings which had been to my benefit. Incidentally, he itas demolished portions of my garden which have taken me over 15 years to cultivate, I have brought all of this to his attention and he has ignored my request to close this practice. Instead,I am now faced with 10 wheel necks on pathways used by me for many years, taking with It and destroyigg the dirt sides and trees as it comes down the path on My proporty. There seems to be the attitude that my neighbor can do as he wishes since ire is AID disregarding previous letters asking him to stop this activity. It is now apparent that he has misled me in all his Intentions. &1omhone cc: Board of Town Trustees Planning Board f SNL9FlLE' �S 550 Aborn Lane Nassau Point Cutchogue, N. Y. 11935 ( 516) 734-5678 August 16. 1991 Re: Proposed subdivision SCTM 1000-118-6-1, 3. 1 by Harry G. and Janet Hohn Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: I have obtained a copy of your letter of August 15, 1991 addressed to Mr. John M. Wagner of the firm of Esseks, Hefter & Angel. In your letter you indicate that the matter was being set for Monday, September 9, 1991 for a final public hearing, and that evidently new maps with revisions "must be received by the hearing date" . Since it is anticipated that such final maps will be filed, probably at a time leaving little or no opportunity to review the newly filed documents prior to the final hearing date, I wish to make my position clear as to that which has been previously filed, more particularly the last revised map dated January 7, 1991. Such map or sketch plan is inaccurate in depicting the location of Aborn Lane, and indicates a driveway which is completely on my property and is not part of Aborn Lane, nor is any other designation on such sketch plan which relates to and is on my property valid or correct. Frankly, it appears that one must be extra cautious since no notification whatsoever is given to any adjoining property owners. I an specifically referring to an application made for a variance to the Suffolk County of Department of Health Services. I appeared at the Health Services Office to examine the file to determine whether there was any opposition to the developers' application. Evidently the developers sought to review the finding by the Department of Health Services that the minimum requirements could not be met. A review was being sought from the Board of Review of the Department of Health Services, because on the face there was clearly insufficient depth to warrant approval. The depth was wholly inadequate, being approximately 23i s Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman August 15, 1991 Town of Southold Planning Board one quarter of the requirement. I was told at that time that there would be no action taken by the Board of Review of the Department of Health Services since the lead agency was the Planning Board, and that any review would be submitted to the Planning Board. Your letter of August 15, 1991 would indicate that the Health Department has given its approval, but does not state the basis for such approval and how the very evident inadequacy is being met. I made reference to just that in my letter of June 10, 1991 to Hr. Lindley of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, with a copy to you. I would ask, at the very least, that whatever revisions and papers are to be filed for this final public hearing scheduled for September 9th be required to be submitted and filed at some date prior to September 9th so that some of us who are interested in what is finally being submitted for determination would have some opportunity to voice our concerns. YEO ctful A. RRELL New York Life Insurance Coy 51 Madison Avenue, New York,*Q,010 212 576-5077 r'. Harry G.Hohn Chairman of the Board YL� August 16, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. AUG 2 1 Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision Harry G. and Janet Hohn Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-118-6-1, 3 . 1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: I was totally unaware of the need not to do clearing of noxious vines and weeds to assist in the preparation of a building site for Lot #1, prior to final approval of the proposed Subdivision. Please be fully assured that all activity stopped on August 11 and that there will be no further activity on the premises. I am sorry for this inadvertent, premature, misstep on my part. We are now working with Mr. Wagner and others to be sure that all of the conditions and requirements set forth in your letter of August 15 are fully met prior to the September 9 Hearing. Sincerely, I OHO Cd a CM CM W, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS r Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 5', ' t"►�l , " Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward ....r_ -.'' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald"- "� P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 15, 1991 John M. Wagner Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision Harry C. and Janet Hohn Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-118-6-1, 3 . 1 Dear Mr. Wagner: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 12, 1991: Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, September 9, 1991 at 7: 30 P.M. for a final public hearing. Maps containing the Health Department' s stamp of approval, and the revisions noted below, must be received by the hearing date, or the hearing will be canceled. 1. The map must be presented at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet. 2. The dotted line shown across the pond must be eliminated. 3 . The potential driveway area for Lots #2 and #3 must be indicated. It must be noted that the actual clearing for the driveways is not to exceed 16 feet in width. 4. Building envelopes are to be indicated for all lots. page 2 Harry C. and Janet Hohn 5. The dotted line indicating the conservation easement by the land now or formerly of Richard and Christopher Hurley and Nassau Point Road, is to be removed. 6. Note on the map that all land located between the building envelopes and Nassau Point Road, other than that indicated as a building envelope, driveway, or existing structure, is within the Conservation Easement. Maintenance of natural vegetation (e.g. removal of dead or diseased plants) shall be the only activity allowed in the areas within the Conservation Easements. In addition, all vegetation on the bluff is to be maintained to prevent erosion. In addition to the revisions mentioned above, an easement may be granted to Lot #3 over Lot #2 to provide Lot #3 with access to Peconic Bay. This easement could be included in either the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions, or the deeds for the particular lots. The Planning Board was notified on August 12, 1991 by Mario Trombone, that some clearing has taken place on your property and his. Although it appears that the clearing is within the potential building envelope for Lot #1, the Board requests that all further clearing be postponed until a final determination has been made on your client' s subdivision. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman S t Su6FxE- ;. P.g mkone Af s A S S O C I A T E S, I N C. A D V E R T I S I N G P U B L I C R E L A T I O N S E V E N T S M A R K E T I N G August 12, 1991 NYSDEC Regulatory Affairs Suny Building 40 Stony Brook, NY 11794 RE: Destruction of trees, plants and other wetland area to the property of Trombone, 9180 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Gentlemen: I understand the owner or occupant of premises immediately to the north of my property has been and is now cutting down trees and growth and otherwise destroying the contour of the beautiful and adjacent area. In doing so,he has come upon my land and has already destroyed all foliage and plantings which had been to my benefit. Incidentally, he has demolished portions of my garden which have taken me over 15 years to cultivate. I have brought all of this to his attention and he has ignored my request to close this practice. Instead, I am now faced with 10 wheel trucks on pathways used by me for many years, taking with it and destroying the dirt sides and trees as it comes down the path on my property. There seems to be the attitude that my neighbor can do as he wishes since he is disregarding previous letters asking him to stop this activity. It is now apparent that he has misled me in all his intentions. Sincerely, f E� rr 5 � 1 3 F' Mario mbone cc: Board of Town Trustees Planning Board 4 5 0 PARK AVENUE S O U T H , N E W Y O R K N Y 1 0 0 1 6 T E L ( 2 1 2 ) 6 8 4 - 2 0 1 0 F A X, : ( 2 1 2 ) 6 8 4 - 6 3 8 3 Su�3s`Gc ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. 0. BOX 279 Rw ERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS 15161 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER (5516) 369-2065 P. O. BOX 570 WATER MILL. N.Y. 11976 JANE ANN R. KRATZ f JOHN M.WAGNER 516) 726-6633 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY THOMAS F. WHELAN August 5, 1991 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Ms. Melissa Spiro, Planner Re: Application of Harry G. and Janet Hohn for Subdivision of Property at Nassau Point Dear Ms. Spiro: In accordance with our recent telephone conversation, I request that the Planning Board, at its August 12, 1991 meeting, schedule the above-referenced subdivision application for a public hearing and final approval at the Board's September 9, 1991 meeting. As you know, the application has been reviewed by the Board of Review of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and has been granted a variance by that Board. A copy of the Board' s decision is enclosed. I am currently working with the Health Department and the County Attorney's office to expedite the Health Department ' s final approval of the subdivision. The only remaining issues involve approval of the form of Health Department covenants, filing of the covenants, and stamping/signature of the final plats . I enclose herewith, for your review and approval, a draft Declaration of Restrictions. I am sending a separate copy of this letter and the enclosed Declaration to Deputy Town Attorney Matthew Kiernan for his review. If the Board has any concern that scheduling of the above-referenced application for public hearing and final approval _ 7 AIbUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER July 12, 1991 Mr. John J. Raynor, P.E., L.S. P.O. Box 720 Water Mill, N. Y. 11976 Dear Mr. Raynor: Subject: Board of Review Hearing -April 25, 1991 Proposed Subdivision of Hohn#90-349,Town of Southold (SCTM 1000-118-6-1 and 3.1) At the hearing on April 25, 1991,you had an opportunity to present your appeal of the department's ruling on the subject application. Based on the following information and in accordance with the provisions of Article 2,Section 760-220, of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code,the determination of the Board of Review is as follows: Statement of Problem Installation of private water supply wells should be screened a minimum of 40 feet into groundwater to comply with the intent of Article 760-606(l.d)and Section 3 of the Department's Standards and Procedures for Private Water Systems. The applicant is requesting approval of shallow wells. Findings and Facts 1. Proposed development of a 7.4 acre parcel into three lots of 54,429 square feet with an existing dwelling; 159,972 square feet with an existing dwelling and a 106,584 square foot parcel to be developed. 2. Site is in Groundwater Management Zone#IV. 3. Area is zoned R40. AJG _ 7 225 RASRO DRIVE EAST HA UPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 151813682900 Mr. John J. Raynor, P.E., L.S. Page Two Subject: Proposed Subdivision of Holm#90-349,Town of Southold (SC-fM 1000-118-G 1 and 3.1) Findings and Facts (cont'd) 4. Public water is not available. 5. Depth to groundwater is about 11.5 feet. 6. Soils are good with sand material 3 feet below grade. 7. Average lot size is 106,983 square feet. 8. Proposal exceeds density requirements. 9. A test well with only 8 feet of water in casing indicated a nitrate level of 1.8 mg/1 and chlorides of 34 mg/l. Y 10. Separation distances between sanitary systems and wells at the two existing homes are 25-30 z feet. Existing wells are in the basement of the homes. 11. Letter dated 6/10/91 received from Mr. George Burrell objecting to granting variance. Determination The Board granted the request for the variance provided the applicant covenants,in language acceptable to the County Attorney, that the parcels will not be further subdivided and that pump capacity will be limited to 10 gpm. Approval of this project tinder the conditions specified will not have any substantial adverse effect. The granting of this waiver does not imply that your application will be automatically approved. It is your responsibility to ensure that your application is complete; otherwise,your approval will be subject to unnecessary delay. Ve/,�truly yo-urys, Dennis Mor E� Chairman,Board of Review DM/lr cc: Walter G. Lindley Susan Windesheim Mr. Frank Dowling, Sr. Planner Mr. and Mrs. Harry G. Hohn- 200 E. 66th St., N.Y.C. 10021 William W. Esseks, Esq.-P.O. Box 279-Riverhead 11901 Mr. John Slattery-Nassau Point Property Owners Assoc., P.O. Box 346,Cutchogue 11935 Town of Southold Planning Board DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION, made as of this day of August, 1991, by EDA L. McKNIGHT KOLBE, residing at 631 Bentley Drive, Naples, Florida 33963, hereinafter referred to as the "Declarant" ; WHEREAS, the Declarant is the owner of property at Nassau Point, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, and State of New York, shown on "Minor Subdivision Map of Harry G. and Janet Hohn, " made by John J. Raynor, P.E. & L.S. , P.C. , dated January 31 , 1991 , and last revised August _, 1991 , and particularly described in "Schedule A" annexed hereto; and WHEREAS, as a condition of granting approval to said "Minor Subdivision Map of Harry G. and Janet Hohn, " the Planning Board of the Town of Southold has required that the subdivision property be subjected to certain restrictions; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby declared as follows: 1. There shall be no further subdivision in perpetuity of any lots shown on said subdivision map. In addition, no lot line shall be changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board, or its successor body. 2. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house and its accessory uses , structures , and facilities, with the intent of — 7 i r� 0 preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 3 . No new sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of the existing bulkhead. No new residential structure shall be constructed within 75 feet of the existing bulkhead. 4 . No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be discharged into the adjoining bodies of water. 5. Erosion and sediment control measures shall be required during and immediately after construction on Lot No. 1 to ensure that stormwater runoff will not carry eroded and other deleterious materials into the tidal wetlands bordering Great Peconic Bay and the adjoining pond. 6. The area on Lot No. 2 of the subdivision map that is designated "Conservation Easement" shall remain in its natural state. Maintenance of natural vegetation shall be the only use allowed in the "Conservation Easement" area. 7. Lot No. 1 of the subdivision map shall not have access directly onto Nassau Point Road within the boundaries of Lot No. 1 . Access to Lot No. 1 shall be over the existing driveway, which is shown on the subdivision map and is located partly on Lot No. 1 and partly on land adjoining the southerly side of Lot No. 1 and owned now and formerly by Mario and Ilse Trombone . If the foregoing means of access to Lot No. 1 is or hereafter becomes infeasible or impossible, access to Lot No. 1 shall be by means of a common driveway, traversing across Lot No. 2, to Aborn Lane. 8. Lot Nos. 2 and 3 shall have access over Aborn Lane. 9. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, or its successor body, after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing, but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 10 . Declarant, her successors or assigns, shall not be liable for a violation of the covenants or restrictions herein contained unless she or they shall be the owner or owners of the land upon which, and at the time when, the violation occurs. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has caused this instrument to be executed as of the day and year first above written. EDA L. McKNIGHT KOLBE STATE OF ) ss . . COUNTY OF ) On the day of August, 1991 , before me personally came EDA L. McKNIGHT KOLBE, to me known and known to me to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she executed the same. NOTARY PUBLIC SCHEDULE "A" DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY DECLARANT: EDA L. MC KNIGHT KOLBE ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being at Nassau Point, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, m and described as follows: ore particularly bounded BEGINNING at the point formed by the intersection of the southeasterly line of Aborn Lane'and the westerly line of Nassau Point Road, and RUNNING THENCE southerly along the westerly line or side of Nassau Point Road, as the same winds and turns, a distance of 226.25 feet, more or less (tie line bears South 040 05' 16" West, 222.71 feet), to lands now or formerly of Richard & Christopher Hurley; thence along said last mentioned lands, the following three (3) courses and distances: (1) South 540 42' 00" West, 200.00 feet; (2) South 090 48' 00" West, 120.00 feet, and (3) North 54° 42' 00" East, 200.00 feet to the westerly line or side of Nassau Point Road; thence southerly along the westerly line or side of Nassau Point Road, as the same winds and turns, a distance of 100.56 feet, more or less (tie line bears South 120 22' 10" East, 100.37 feet), to lands now or formerly of Mario & Ilse Trombone; thence South 540 43' 00" West, along last mentioned lands, 714.68 feet more or less to the shoreline of Great Peconic Bay; thence along the shoreline of Great Peconic Bay, as the same winds and turns, the following four (4) tie-line courses and distances: (1) North 370 19' 15"'West, 67.74 feet; (2) North 400 59' 50" West, 205.42 feet; (3) North 45° 02' 09" West, 127.84 feet, and (4) North 470 54' 38" West, 121.21 feet to lands now or formerly of Charles & Maude B. Hammer; thence North 540 42' 00" East, along last mentioned lands, 143.03 feet more or less to the southerly line of a 15 foot wide right-of-way; thence southeasterly along the southerly and southwesterly line or side of said 15 foot wide right-of -way, as the same winds and turns, a distance of 255 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly line of Aborn_Lane; thence North 540 42' 00" East, along the southeasterly line of Aborn Lane, 730.00 feet to the point or place of beginning, and comprising an area of 7.368 acres, be the same, more or less, a portion of which being and intended to be the southerly part of Lot 93 as shown on the Proposed Subdivision Map of Section "B", Nassau Point Club Properties, Inc., Map No. 745, as filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on October 1, 1919, and on the Subdivision Map of Amended Map "A" of Nassau Point, Map No. 156, as filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on August 16, 1922. 4:OUNTY OF SUFFOLK �-f PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER July 12, 1991 Mr. John J. Raynor, P.E., L.S. P.O. Box 720 Water Mill, N. Y. 11976 Dear Mr. Raynor: Subject: Board of Review Hearing - April 25, 1991 Proposed Subdivision of Hohn#90-349,Town of Southold (SCTM 1000-118-6-1 and 3.1) At the hearing on April 25, 1991,you had an opportunity to present your appeal of the department's ruling on the subject application. Based on the following information and in accordance with the provisions of Article 2,Section 760-220, of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code,the determination of the Board of Review is as follows: Statement of Problem Installation of private water supply wells should be screened a minimum of 40 feet into groundwater to comply with the intent of Article 760-606(l.d) and Section 3 of the Department's Standards and Procedures for Private Water Systems. The applicant is requesting approval of shallow wells. Findings and Facts 1. Proposed development of a 7.4 acre parcel into three lots of 54,429 square feet with an existing dwelling; 159,972 square feet with an existing dwelling and a 106,584 square foot parcel to be developed. 2. Site is in Groundwater Management Zone#IV. 3. Area is zoned R-40. 225 RAGRO DRIVE EAST HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 15161348-2900 Y • 4 • Mr. John J. Raynor, P.E., L.S. Page Two Subject. Proposed Subdivision of Hohn#90-349,Town of Southold (SCTM 1000-118-6-1 and 3.1) Findings and Facts (cont'd) 4. Public water is not available. 5. Depth to groundwater is about 11.5 feet. 6. Soils are good with sand material 3 feet below grade. 7. Average lot size is 106,983 square feet. 8. Proposal exceeds density requirements. 9. A test well with only 8 feet of water in casing indicated a nitrate level of 1.8 mg/l and chlorides of 34 mg/l. 10. Separation distances between sanitary systems and wells at the two existing homes are 25-30 feet. Existing wells are in the basement of the homes. 11. Letter dated 6/10/91 received from Mr. George Burrell objecting to granting variance. Determination The Board granted the request for the variance provided the applicant covenants, in language acceptable to the County Attorney,that the parcels will not be further subdivided and that pump capacity will be limited to 10 gpm. Approval of this project under the conditions specified will not have any substantial adverse effect. The granting of this waiver does not imply that your application will be automatically approved. It is your responsibility to ensure that your application is complete; otherwise,your approval will be subject to unnecessary delay. Ve ly yours, Dennis Mora Chairman,Board of Review DM/Ir cc: Walter G. Lindley Susan Windesheim Mr. Frank Dowling, Sr. Planner Mr. and Mrs. Hang G. Hohn-200 E. 66th St.,N.Y.C. 10021 ! b William W. Esseks, Esq.-P.O. Box 279-Riverhead 11901 Mr. John Slattery-Nassau Point Property Owners Assoc., P.O. Box 346,Cutchogue 11935 Town of Southold Planning Board PP 550 Aborn Lane - Nassau Points Cutchogue, N. Y. 11935 ( 516 ) 734-5678 June 10, 1991 JUN 1 1 1991 Mr. Walter Lindley Senior Environmentsl Planner Suffolk County Department of Health Services Wastewater Management Section Suffolk County Center Riverhead, N. Y. 11901 Re: Harry & Janet Hohn SCTM• 1000-118-6-1-3. 1 SCDHS Ref. No. 90-349 Dear Mr. Lindley: I wish to thank you for your courtesy and the opportunity afforded me to review the records on file at your office in the above matter. My delay in responding has been due to my inability to contact Dr. Grimes who, as has been previously noted is also an immediate adjacent owner to this proposed subdivision. This letter is more by way of concern that Dr. Grimes and I both have to the advisability of having an additional well or wells in fairly close proximity to our present well locations. We believe that it is truly a matter of concern when just about one quarter of the minimum requirements are met; particularly when there is merely eleven inches of depth to the water, when the requirement is that there be 40 inches. The disparity is too great to overcome our concern or to be treated lightly I have already had wells which have been replaced and relocated. Additionally there are a number of established lots which may make demands upon the water table in the future, and which may become prejudiced by reason of the subdivision and the proposal for an additional well or wells. At the present time there is another lot adjacent to this proposed subdivision, and this too may present additional problems with the water table which is reputed to be precarious. While this letter is being written to you as a Senior Environment Planner of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, it may be that final determinations are either with the Southold Board of Trustees or the Southold Planning Board. Hr. Walter Lindley Suffolk Co. Dept. of Health Services June 10, 1991 - 2 - Since I an not certain what is procedurally correct, I as forwarding copies of this letter both to the Southold Board of Trustees, and to the Southold Planning Board. eg truly,Y rs, GEORG A. �BURRELL cc: Royal Reynolds, Senior Public Health Eingineer John Bredemeyer, President, Southold Board of Trustees Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman, Southold Planning Board Dennis Horan, P.E, Suffolk Co. Dept. of Health Services SueGr c.0 rvt 5 ESsEKS, HEFTER 6 ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. BOX 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (516) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R. ANGEL TELEX EHCA 6852318 UW P. Q, Box 570 TELECOMER N1M6ER(516) 369-2065 JANE ANN R. KRATZ WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 JOHN M. WAGNER (516) 726-6633 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY May 20 , 1991 TMOMAS F. WHELAN Mr. George A. Burrell 9960 South Ocean Drive Apartment 1404 Jensen Beach, Florida 34957 Re: Notice of Petition of Harry and Janet Hohn to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Dear Mr. Burrell: By letter dated April 16, 1991, you requested information from me with respect to the above-referenced Notice. I apologize for not having had the opportunity to respond- to your inquiry before now. The Notice you received concerned an application made by my firm' s clients, Harry and Janet Hohn, to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals for relief pursuant to 5280-a of the New York State Town Law. As you know, Mr. and Mrs. Hohn have received "sketch plan" approval for a subdivision of certain property located south of Aborn Lane at Nassau Point, Town of Southold. The approved subdivision sketch plan provides for division of the property into three parcels. The application to the Zoning Board of Appeals, to which the above-referenced Notice pertained, was made in connection with the Planning Board's requirements for access to the three proposed subdivision lots. As you may know, the Planning Board is requiring that Lots 2 and 3 of the subdivision have access over Aborn Lane. The Planning Board is also requiring that Lot 1 of the subdivision have access either to Nassau Point Road over an existing driveway on property south of the proposed subdivision owned by Mario and Ilse Trombone or, alternatively, to Aborn Lane by means of a common driveway with Lot 2. Since you received the above-referenced Notice, the Zoning Board of Appeals, in consultation with the Planning Board, has determined that it will not consider an application regarding the MAY 2 1 i991 ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW Mr. George A. Burrell May 20, 1991 Page Two proposed access to the subdivision lots and that the Planning Board should more properly resolve any access question. Accordingly, the questions of access will be addressed by the Planning Board in connection with its review of the final application for the proposed subdivision. No application will proceed before the Zoning Board of Appeals. I trust that the foregoing answers any concerns you may have. If you have any other questions or comments, please feel free to contact the Planning Board, which is continuing its review of the proposed subdivision. Very truly yours, ,V72ni John M. Wagner JMW:pi cc: Harry and Janet Hohn Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Planning Board o � , PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ', y„ ' ' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman V� ""A` .0 Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �'t1� - Richard G. Ward 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 6, 1991 John M. Wagner Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P:O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Subdivision Application for Harry C. and Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1, 3 .1 Dear Mr. Esseks: The Planning Board has reviewed the Zoning Board of Appeals April 12 , 1990, letter which was sent to you. The Planning Board is requiring that the following be included in the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions, in reference to access to Lot #1: 1 . Lot #1 shall not have access directly on to Nassau Point Road within the boundaries of Lot #1. Access shall be over one of the following: A. The existing driveway, which is partly located on land owned now or formerly by Mario and Ilse Trombone. Such driveway is located on SCTM# 1000-118-6-5. 1 and is shown on the map of the Subdivision for Harry G. and Janet Hohn. B. If access in accordance with "A" above, is not feasible, Lots 1 and 2 are to share a common driveway which traverses across Lot 2, to Aborn Lane. The final maps must contain a notation of the above mentioned restrictions. 1 Upon submission of a draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions, including the above and all the previously requested restrictions, the Planning Board will forward the document to the Town Attorney for review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, /"h15 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS `� u T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ; ♦Y � - Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. •;�_'�� ,� Richard G. Ward ! ' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 22, 1991 Robert N. Thurber SUNY Campus, Building 40, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 RE: Notices for Wetlands Permits Proposed Subdivision for Harry and Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1 & 3.1 DEC# 1-4738-00203/00001-0 Dear Mr. Thurber: The Planning Board has received a notice of complete application for permission to subdivide land within tidal wetlands. In the future, notices for wetland permits involving subdivisions should be sent to the Planning Board and the Board of Trustees. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. '~s Chairman cc: John Bredemeyer, President, Board of Trustees LWRP Advisory Committee NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION APPLICANT Dale: 04/01/91 HARRY G & JANET HOHN 200 EAST 66TH ST. NEW YORK, NY 10021 APPLICATION to 1-4738-00203/00001-0 11 PERMITS APPLIED FOR 1 ARTICLE 25: TIDAL WETLANDS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN SOUTHOLD IN SUFFOLK COUNTY. PROJECT DESCRIPTION. the applicant proposes to subdivide a 7.37 acre parcel into three residential lots, each to be in excess of one acre. Project site is located on Great Peconic Bay, west of Nassau Pt. Rd., south of Aborn Lane, Nassau Point, NY. SCTMno. 1000-118-6-1&3.1 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW(SEOR)DETERMINATION: SEOR - 2 Project is a Type I action and will not have a significant effect on the environment. A coordinated review with other agencies was performed and a Negative Declaration is on file. SEOR LEAD AGENCY SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT(SHPA)DETERMINATION SHPA - 2 A Structural-Archaeological Assessment Form has been completed. The proposed activity will not have any impact on registered, eligible or inventoried archaeological sites or historic structures. No further review in accordance with SHPA is required. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN A COASTAL MANAGEMENT AREA AND IS SUBJECT TO THE WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION AND COASTAL RESOURCES ACT. AVAILABILITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. CONTACT PERSON Comments on this project must be ROBERT N THURBER submitted in writing to the Contact SUNY CAMPUS, BLDG 40, ROOM 219 Person no later than 05/03/91 STONY BROOK, NY 11790-2356 TO THE APPLICANT. I. THIS IS NOT A PERMIT 2. This is to advise you that your applicalion is complete and a review has wrnrrxmwd Adihlinnal nlorniation may to naluostod from you at a future dale,it deemed necessary,in order to reach a decision on your apphcaWn. 3. Your project is dassired MAJOR. Accordingly,a decision will be node within 90 days of the dale of this Nouco II a pudic heanrg is necessary,you will h:notdied wdhur 60 days and the hearing will wmnience wilhin 90 rays of the dale of this ounce. II a hearing is had, the final decision will be made within 60 days alter Ila hearing is completed! -- 4. Publcalnn of this Nulice in a newspalrefr is fetfuired Consull the accompanying Inslruclmns for Newspaper Publication. SEND TO. SUPERVISOR, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CC anal Exelive Officer Erivuurimentai Nutce Bdlolm.{Aim 509,50 Will Riad Allany,N Y 122334500 File SUPERVISOR,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD G STADNIK MS APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS j SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Gerard P.Goehringer,Chairman Charles Grigonis,Jr. Town Hall,53095 Main Road Serge Doyen,Jr. P.O.Box 1179 James Dinizio, Jr. Southold,New York 11971 Robert A. Villa BOARD OF APPEALS Fax(516)765-1823 Telephone(516)765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone(516)765-1800 April 12 , 1991 John M. Wagner, Esq. 108 East Main Street APR 16 139'! P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Pending Subdivision/Re-Division of Land Applicants: Harry and Janet Hohn CTM #1000-118-6-1 and 3 . 1 at Nassau Point Dear Mr. Wagner: In reviewing the above application for filing with our office, it was noted that this is a request for an interpreta- tion as to the need for 280-a access approval in this pending re-division of land for three (conforming) lots. Since all three of these lots will have direct frontage along a town street shown on a previously filed subdivision map, it is our position that it would be more feasible for the Planning Board to retain its jurisdiction under the 280-a review as part of the subdivision process. The Board of Appeals would normally take jurisdiction if, at the time of considering a building permit application, " . . .a street or highway giving access to such proposed structure" were not on "a street on a plat duly filed and recorded in the office of the county clerk or register prior to the appointment of such planning board. . . . " ( Subdivision 2, Article 16, Section 280a) . This is not the case in this re-division project since there is direct frontage on both Nassau Point Road and Aborn Lane. We have no objection to the Planning Board' s retaining its 280-a jurisdiction as part of the subdivision process. As an alternative to a curb cut along Nassau Point Road for Lot #1, perhaps a written agreement would be acceptable to the Planning Board to continue use of the Trombone driveway access for Lot #1, as proposed. In the event of a change of ownership or use over that driveway in the future, the applicant/owner, at the time of filing a building permit application, would return to the Town for appropriate approval of access under Section opt Page 2 - April 12, 1991 To: John M. Wagner, Esq. Re: Re-Division of Land Harry and Janet Hohn 280-a of the Town Law for Lot #1 (and if preferred, at the time of an application for a building permit, to the Board of Appeals) . It is our understanding that the applicant is not planning to build a home on Lot #1 at this time. In any event, jurisdiction under 280-a for this re-division of land, in our opinion, may continue solely before the Planning Board. Should you have any questions or other concerns, please feel free to contact our office. Very tru you , GERARD P. GOEHR GER CHAIRMAN lk Cc: Planning Board Enclosures : Hohn check #393 and three prints of the map . PLANNING BOARD . 20 APRI19, 1991 CMr. Orlowski: We sent you a letter on that on March 6th. Mr. Salvatore: Is that the date that you made the decision? Mr. Orlowski: Yes. Mr. Salvatore: O.K. , thank you. Mr. Orlowski: O.K. , any other questions or comments for the Board? Mr. John Wagner: I 'd like to recommend you adopt the Harry Hohn subdivision on Nassau Point. This Board has considered the recommendations and requirements of the Suffolk County Planning Commission and I have an additional request of the Board tonight with respect to condition number two of those conditions. That condition provides that grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible and to minimize storm water runoff and erosion. We have a concern about the restriction the condition has to a house. In other words, we are concerned that the liberal interpretation of this condition might be that we don' t have any right to clear for replacement C of accessory structures or facilities such as a driveway or a pool or a deck or anything that might be accessory to the house. I think that it is a reasonable request that we be allowed to add any permitted uses. I would just like to suggest a modification to that condition that we just insert after the word house the following words" and its accessory uses, structures and facilities" . I think it would cover all the concerns that we have. I don' t think it was ever the Planning Board' s intent to say that only houses can be built on the property but if you get an unreasonable person who wants to interpret the covenants that we placed on the property pursuant to a subdivision approval, it might become a problem in the future so we would like to avoid it now if we can. Mr. Orlowski: I don' t think that is a problem. Do you want to put that in writing? Mr. Wagner: I have it here for you tonight, I have marked up a copy if you would like to review it? Mr. Ward: We will just amend it. Mr. Chairman, I would like to offer the following resolution as an amendment to the resolution of approval for the Harry and Janet Hohn subdivision regarding Item two, clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and construction of a house and its accessory uses, structures and facilities with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation of the site as Possible and to minimize storm water runoff and erosion. The PLANNING BOARD 21 APRI�, 1991 C inclusion of and its accessory uses, structures and facilities as the amendment. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. Ward, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Orlowski. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. Mr. Orlowski: Any other comments or questions for the Board? Mr. Paul Dinizio: President of Flint Street Corp. , resident of Southold Town and Greenport. I was sent an envelope certified mail from the Planning Board. I assume it is an application for a site plan on a piece of property which has a Certificate of Occupancy for a business office and retail sales. Number one, I would like to know what the purpose of this is when I already have a C.O. and I am using the building as stated in the Certificate of Occupancy. Mr. Orlowski: Well, we noticed there was a change of use. When that was granted the Building Inspector told us that was for a plumbing shop. Mr. Dinizio: What is the difference between, I am selling retail items out of there. Mr. Orlowski: We feel the use is more intense than a plumber' s shop. Mr. Dinizio: Have you ever been to any local plumber' s shops during the day in Town? Mr. Orlowski: Should we have gotten a site plan for that too? Mr. Dinizio: I would assume, I mean, if I have to. That was another question I have. If I have to, how come Mr. Celic didn' t? Also, how come every store in Southold Town that changes its use, why don' t they need a site Plan? Such as, Feather Hills or Mattituck Shopping Plaza or any of your stores, vacant stores downtown, that would be vacated and a new tenant or owner move in? Mr. Orlowski: Well, in most instances, if there is a significant change of use to a greater intensity, and we feel this one was, we will require a site plan. Otherwise, the site plan would be waived if it was going to be a less intense use. Shopping centers that have approved site plans have the square footage usually laid out and mapped out with the parking and 41 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK � OD?A: Ar '1016 PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS. M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER April 9, 1991 Mr. John J. Raynor, P.E. , L. S. P. O. Box 720 Water Mill, New York 11976 RE: Proposed Subdivision of Hohn #90-349, (T) Southold (SCTM 1000-118-6-1 and 3. 1) Dear Mr. Raynor: Your request to appear before the Board of Review of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services has been received. The review of this case has been scheduled for April 25, 1991, at 10: 30 a.m. , in the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Conference Room, County Center, Room S-238, Riverhead. You and interested parties are requested to appear, with or without counsel, and you may produce any information or evidence concerning the above referenced property. Should you have any questions, please call Walter G. Lindley at 516-548-3312 . Very truly yours, Dennis Moran, P.E. Chairman Board of Review DM:cah cc: Mr. James L. Corbin Mr. Steven Cary, P.E. Mr. Walter G. Lindley Ms. Susan D. Windesheim Mr. Frank Dowling, Sr. Planner Mr. & Mrs. Harry G. Hohn Mr. William W. Esseks, Esq. Mr. John Slattery Town of Southold Planning Board COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD. N.Y. I ISO PLANNING BOARD • 20 APRIL 1, 91 '. > Mr. Orlowski: We sent you a letter on that on March 6th. CMr. Salvatore: Is that the date that you made the decision? Mr. Orlowski: Yes. Mr. Salvatore: O.K. , thank you. Mr. Orlowski: O.K. , any other questions or comments for the Board? xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mr. John Wagner: I 'd like to recommend you adopt the Harry Hohn subdivision on Nassau Point. This Board has considered the recommendations and requirements of the Suffolk County Planning Commission and I have an additional request of the Board tonight with respect to condition number two of those conditions. That condition provides that grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible and to minimize storm water runoff and erosion. We have a concern about the restriction the condition has to a house. In other words, we are concerned that the liberal interpretation of this condition might be that we don' t have any right to clear for replacement C of accessory structures or facilities such as a driveway or a pool or a deck or anything that might be accessory to the house. I think that it is a reasonable request that we be allowed to add any permitted uses. I would just like to suggest a modification to that condition that we just insert after the word house the following words" and its accessory uses, structures and facilities" . I think it would cover all the concerns that we have. I don' t think it was ever the Planning Board' s intent to say that only houses can be built on the property but if you get an unreasonable person who wants to interpret the covenants that we placed on the property pursuant to a subdivision approval, it might become a problem in the future so we would like to avoid it now if we can. Mr. Orlowski: I don' t think that is a problem. Do you want to put that in writing? Mr. Wagner: I have it here for you tonight, I have marked up a copy if you would like to review it? Mr. Ward: We will just amend it. Mr. Chairman, I would like to offer the following resolution as an amendment to the resolution of approval for the Harry and Janet Hohn subdivision regarding Item two, clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and construction of a house and its accessory uses, structures and facilities with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation of the site as possible and to minimize storm water runoff and erosion. The PLANNING BOARD . 21 APRIL 1, 91 C inclusion of and its accessory uses, structures and facilities as the amendment. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. Ward, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Orlowski. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. Mr. Orlowski: Any other comments or questions for the Board? Mr. Paul Dinizio: President of Flint Street Corp. , resident of Southold Town and Greenport. I was sent an envelope certified mail from the Planning Board. I assume it is an application for a site plan on a piece of property which has a Certificate of Occupancy for a business office and retail sales. Number one, I would like to know what the purpose of this is when I already have a C.O. and I am using the building as stated in the Certificate of Occupancy. Mr. Orlowski: Well, we noticed there was a change of use. C When that was granted the Building Inspector told us that was for a plumbing shop. Mr. Dinizio: What is the difference between, I am selling retail items out of there. Mr. Orlowski: We feel the use is more intense than a plumber' s shop. Mr. Dinizio: Have you ever been to any local plumber' s shops during the day in Town? Mr. Orlowski: Should we have gotten a site plan for that too? Mr. Dinizio: I would assume, I mean, if I have to. That was another question I have. If I have to, how come Mr. Celic didn' t? Also, how come every store in Southold Town that changes its use, why don' t they need a site Plan? Such as, Feather Hills or Mattituck Shopping Plaza or any of your stores, vacant stores downtown, that would be vacated and a new tenant or owner move in? Mr. Orlowski: Well, in most instances, if there is a significant change of use to a greater intensity, and we feel this one was, we will require a site plan. Otherwise, the site plan would be waived if it was going to be a less intense use. Shopping centers that have approved site plans have the square footage usually laid out and mapped out with the parking and PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS c` T y SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman w �� .Q' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward 1 x ✓ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 2, 1991 John M. Wagner Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 E. Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Harry & Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1-3 .1 Dear Mr. Wagner: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 1, 1991: Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board amend their March 11, 1991, resolution in reference to Number 2 of the February 7, 1991, Suffolk County Planning Commission report as follows: Number 2 of the Suffolk County Planning Commission report is to be revised to read: Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house and its accessory uses, structures and facilities with, the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 1+tjr Chairman Encl. cc: Suffolk County Planning Commission a PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS `` o w-"w` i--� SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ✓,� -- '�• .r _ Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 12, 1991 John M. Wagner Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 E. Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Harry & Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1-3 .1 Dear Mr. Wagner: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 11, 1991. Be it RESOLVED to adopt the February 7, 1991 , Suffolk County Planning Commission report with the following amendments (numbers correspond to numbers in report) : 1. To be amended to read: No Lot line shall be changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2. Is to remain as written. 3 . To be amended to read: Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots 1, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision in perpetuity. 4. To be amended to read: No new sanitary disposal facility shall be cgnstructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of existing bulkhead. 4a. To be added: No new residential structure shall be constructed within 75 feet of existing bulkhead. 5 & 6. Are to remain as written. F; i Page 2 Harry & Janet Hohn 7 . To be amended to read: These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 8 . To remain as written. This must include the Liber and page number. The following items are also required: A. The non-use area is to be re-labeled as a conservation easement. B. The conservation easement shall remain in its natural state. Maintenance of this natural vegetation shall be the only use allowed. Items 1,2 , 3 ,4, 4a,5, 6, 7 and B from above, must be presented in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions in proper legal form. A copy of the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be submitted for review by the Planning Board and the Town Attorney. Once approved, the document must be filed in the Office of the County Clerk. Items 8 and A from above, must be shown on the final map. Upon receipt of the Zoning Board of Appeal's decision in regard to the 280a access applications, the Planning Board may request additional covenants and restrictions. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr! Chairman /lrls Encl. cc: Suffolk County Planning Commission > zr.wx y mow, x a� K •'r'+" tlr"Ss ' i COUNTY OF SUFFOLK -. PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR N. - NZ DIRECTOR OF PLA,NtNG February 7, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - Harry & Janet Hohn Southeasterly corner of Nassau Point Road and Aborn Lane, Nassau Point, Town of Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on February 6, 1991, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Harry & Janet Hohn" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. After due study and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following conditions deemed necessary for good planning and land use. 1. No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 3. Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots 1, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision. 4. No new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of existing bulkhead. 5. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be' discharged into the adjoining bodies of water. , t +"Tt5 t�k A VETERANS HIGHWAY N GE,LI..NEW YORK 11788 15161360S1G2 � T - �n ' Page —2- ------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ 6. Erosion and sediment control measures shall be required during and immediately after construction on Lot No. 1 to insure that stormwater runoff will not carry eroded and other deleterious materials into the tidal wetlands bordering Great Peconic Bay and the adjoining pond. 7. Conditions 3 and 4, shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval to this subdivision. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 8. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's office which affects lots in this subdivision. The Commission also offers the following comments on the map for your use and consideration: 1. The map of this minor subdivision should be filed in the office of the County Clerk. This is to insure the validity of the subdivision map and that the subdivision map will be available to the general public in a central office of official records. 2. According to a map that was received from the State of New York this property appears to be located within an area that is considered to be archaeologically sensitive. Many sites contain material and/or buildings that are of prehistoric or historic value. These sites should be preserved or developed with a sensitivity for historic or cultural values that can be available for the appreciation of future generations. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning bygnk LCF;,Frling{ r. Planner Suon Review Division File: S-SD-91-01 „ FD:mb �.s cc: J. Baier, C.E., SCDHS "`ra New York Life Insurance Compar., 51 Madison Avenue,New York,NY 1410 212 576-5077 Harry G.Hohn Chairman of the Board March 28, 1991 Mr. Walter Lindley Senior Environmental Planner Suffolk County Department of Health Services Wastewater Management Section Suffolk County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Harry & Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1-3.1 Dear Mr. Lindley: SCDHS Ref. No. 90-349 The Hearing now scheduled by your Department for April 11, 1991 on the above is very important to me and my family. Therefore, I had clearly planned to attend along with my experts, but now find because of the date this is not possible. On April 11, 1991 I will be running the Annual Meeting of the Foundation for Independent Higher Education. (I serve as Chairman of the Board of that charitable organization [pro bono] to help meet the financial needs of the 660 member private colleges through coordinated corporate giving. ) For the record, let me state what I have been attempting to accomplish over the last fifteen months with various governmental agencies. I wish to build a year-round home on Nassau Point to which I will retire full time in a few years. In order to be in that position I had to purchase the entire seven plus acre parcel of land now being subdivided. Each of the three Lots is substantially over the minimum land acre requirements. The vacant Lot (Lot #1) is the Lot on which we would like to build our home (the test well site) . The contiguous Lot with the Beach House on it would be retained by me and would be used only for my four married daughters and their families, including our four wonderful grandchildren. By having this facility available, Janet and I will get to see our grandchildren on a regular basis. This alone is worth the fifteen month process. APR - x991 r J - 2 1 The third Lot (Lot #3) on Aborn Lane may very well also be retained within my immediate family if that is at all economically feasible. Thus, I am probably the most concerned party about the careful and prudent use of the land and all of its natural attributes and beauty. Many of the conditions imposed upon my simple use of the seven plus acre parcel are all very well intentioned but they do tend to restrict the application of good environmental judgment by me for decades in the future. Clearly what I am NOT is a developer or land speculator. This is to be my home and all I am asking for is an opportunity to be a responsible citizen in a community in which we have lived for almost ten years. For your further background I have enclosed a copy of the 1990 Annual Report of New York Life of which I am Chairman of the Board. I am not tooting my own horn but merely explaining my priorities. I don't have time for land speculation but want to spend all of my spare time building better relationships with my family and the Nassau Point community. I y, cc: Royal Reynolds, Senior Public Health Engineer John Bredemeyer, President, Southold Board of Trustees Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman, Southold Planning Board Attachment r t ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW ( 108 EAST MAIN STREET J P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 WILLIAM W. E55EK5 (5 16) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R. ANGEL TELEx-EHCA 6852318 UW P. 0. Box 570 TELECOPIER NUMBER(516) 369-2065 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 JANE ANN R. KRATz (5 16) 726-6633 JOHN M.WAGNER _ WILLIAM POWER MALONEY THOMAS F.WHELAN March 26, 1991 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application of Harry and Janet Hohn for Minor Subdivision S.C.T.M. # 1000-118-6-1, 3.1 Dear Members of the Board: I understand that you are holding a meeting on Monday, April 1, 1991. Please be advised that I wish to attend the aforesaid meeting to discuss a suggested modification to Condition "2" of the conditions of approval of the Suffolk County Planning Commission for the above-referenced subdivision, as set forth in the letter of Arthur H. Kunz dated February 7, 1991. The proposed modification is with respect to accessory uses or structures upon the subdivision parcels. I look forward to seeing you on the evening of April 1, 1991. Very truly yours, John M. Wagner JMW:pi r•3,�F(ILYr PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS a �`-, rn SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman a, Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. '� Richard G. Ward �� Y t� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards pLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 12, 1991 John M. Wagner Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 E. Main Street: P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Harry & Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1-3 . 1 Dear Mr. Wagner: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 11, 1991. Be it RESOLVED to adopt the February 7, 1991, Suffolk County Planning Commission report with the following amendments (numbers correspond to numbers in report) : 1 . To be amended to read: No Lot line shall be changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2. Is to remain as written. 3 . To be amended to read: Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots 1, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision in perpetuity. 4. To be amended to read: No new sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of existing bulkhead. 4a. To be added: No new residential structure shall be constructed within 75 feet of existing bulkhead. 5 & 6 . Are to remain as written. Page 2 Harry & Janet Hohn 7 . To be amended to read: These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 8. To remain as written. This must include the Liber and page number. The following items are also required: A. The non-use area is to be re-labeled as a conservation easement. B. The conservation easement shall remain in its natural state. Maintenance of this natural vegetation shall be the only use allowed. Items 1, 2, 3 ,4, 4a,5,6, 7 and B from above, must be presented in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions in proper legal form. A copy of the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be submitted for review by the Planning Board and the Town Attorney. Once approved, the document must be filed in the Office of the County Clerk. Items 8 and A from above, must be shown on the final map. Upon receipt of the Zoning Board of Appeal' s decision in regard to the 280a access applications, the Planning Board may request additional covenants and restrictions. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, / /� �72U.CI�r�- IGC' Bennett Orlowski, Jr1 /� Chairman /✓IS Encl. cc: Suffolk County Planning Commission COUNTY OF SUFFOLK r, p rn� PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING February 7, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - Harry & Janet Hohn Southeasterly corner of Nassau Point Road and Aborn Lane, Nassau Point, Town of Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on February 6, 1991, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Harry & Janet Hohn" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. After due study and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following conditions deemed necessary for good planning and land use. 1. No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any•manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 3. Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots 1, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision. 4. No new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of existing bulkhead. 5. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be discharged into the adjoining bodies of water. VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE. L.L. NEW YORK 11788 (316)360-8192 Page -2- ------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. Erosion and sediment control measures shall be required during and immediately after construction on Lot No. 1 to insure that stormwater runoff will not carry eroded and other deleterious materials into " the tidal wetlands bordering Great Peconic Bay and the adjoining pond. 7. Conditions 3 and 4, shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval to this subdivision. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 8. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's office which affects lots in this subdivision. The Commission also offers the following comments on the map for your use and consideration: 1. The map of this minor subdivision should be filed in the office of the County Clerk. This is to insure the validity of the subdivision map and that the subdivision map will be available to the general public in a central office of official records. 2. According to a map that was received from the State of New York this property appears to be located within an area that is considered to be archaeologically sensitive. Many sites contain material and/or buildings that are of prehistoric or historic value. These sites should be preserved or developed with a sensitivity for historic or cultural values that can be available for the appreciation of future generations. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning byOnkowl Ci Fring,( r. Planner Subdivision R&ftew Division File: S-SD-91-01 FD:mb cc: J. Baier, C.E. , SCDHS ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (516) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELEX-EHCA 6852318 UW P. 0. BOX 570 TELECOPIER NUM6ER(516) 369-2065 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 JANE ANN R. KRATZ (516) 726-6633 JOHN M. WAGNER WILLIAM POWER MALONEY March 1 1 , 1991 THOMAS F. WHELAN Planning Board of the Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re : Minor Subdivision Application of Harry and Janet Hohn Dear Members of the Board : Your Board is currently reviewing the conditions of the Suffolk County Planning Commission's approval of the above- referenced subdivision, as set forth in a letter from Director of Planning Arthur H. Kunz, dated February 7, 1991 . I appeared at your Board' s February 25, 1991 meeting to discuss Mr . Kunz' s letter. Your Board did not have sufficient memebers present that evening to act upon the conditions of Mr . Kunz' s letter . Nevertheless , I voiced my concern to you that night , and I repeat my concern here, about the 100-foot setback imposed by Condition "4" of Mr. Kunz's letter. I respectfully request, on behalf of my clients , that the required setback from the existing bulkhead on the property for any residential construction be no greater than 75 feet . A 75-foot setback is consistent with Section 100-239. 4B of the Southold Town Code . My clients are also concerned about the scope of Condition "2" of Mr . Kunz' s letter. My clients advise me that, unlike other properties on Nassau Point, the subject property has MAR 121991 Ir ESsEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW Planning Board of the Town of Southold March 11 , 1991 Page 2 been neglected for some years . As a result, the property contains a noxious undergrowth of poisonous plants and brambles ( including , but not limited to poison ivy) , an extensive overgrowth of vines, which are killing otherwise healthy trees , and several dead or dying trees , which are potentially dangerous . At the time my clients commence construction of their proposed residence, they wish to cut back the overgrowth of vines , remove the noxious undergrowth, and remove dead or dying trees from the property. By so doing, my clients hope to improve the appearance of the property and provide for its safe use . I respectfully request that the Board modify Condition "2" of Mr . Kunz' s letter to allow for the limited removal of vegetation set forth above. Thank you for your cooperation . Very truly yours , John M. Wagner /do � s PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSrn SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �Yo ci"� �* O� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �t' L Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 15, 1991 John M. Wagner Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Harry & Janet Hohn SCTM#1000-118-6-1-3 . 1 Dear Mr. Wagner: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 11, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, lneU1 I Bennett Orlowski, Jr. As Chairman Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS r�r SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �+O '"'�� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward , i Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: March 11, 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) otthe Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Minor Subdivision Harry G. & Janet Hohn SEQR Status: Type I Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves the Subdivision of a 7.368 acre parcel into three (3) single family residential lots. Two of the three lots contain existing dwellings. There is a bulkhead along the unimproved lot on Great Peconic Bay. Individual wells and sanitary systems are proposed. SCTM Number: District 1000 - Section 118 - Block 06 -Lots 1 & 3.1 Location: The site is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Aborn Lane (Private Road), and Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, New York. Page I ort Minor Subdivision-Hohn SEQR Determination Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: 1) The subject property is zoned R-40, allowing lots of 40,000 square feet or greater. The use involves 3 lots on 7.368 acres, and an average lot size of 2.456 acres, or 0.41 units per acre. 2) The proposed project conforms to the density standards for single family residential development established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services,in order to protect groundwater. The project is consistent with groundwater management guidelines as outlined in the 208 Study, SC Sanitary Code Article 6, and considered by the Town of Southold in revie,v of the project. 3) The site contains important resources including a freshwater pond, shoreline along Great Peconic Bay, and areas with slopes in excess of 30 percent. Two of the lots already contain dwellings, and therefore the intensity of use will not be increased. One site will be developed in the future. There is a sufficient building envelop on this site to permit environmentally sound development. A building envelop will be established through the subdivision review process in order to ensure that site use occures in the least sensitive areas. 4) Additional conditions which are aspects of the project and/or are reflected on the map in order to minimize environmental impacts include: a. There is to be no further subdivision of any lot in perpetuity. b. The designated non-use area is to be left in its natural state. C. If additional access should be necessary, Lots 1 and 2 shall share a common driveway which traverses across Lot 2, to Aborn Lane. d. Lot 3 shall continue to have access over Aborn Lane For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board Address: Town Hall, Main Road, Southold Phone No.: (516) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Applicant-Harry G. & Janet Hohn Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Trustees Southold Town Building Department Page 2 of 2 • :�2 i i ,iit',t CRAMER, VR OCIATES ��� ENVIRONMENT yqN[ ; G CONSULTANTS �d March 8, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ' Re: Harry C. and Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1 & 3.1 Dear Benny: Asper the your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with your correspondence of January 16, 1991. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The project represents a low intensity use of land. We are in full agreement with the conditions of sketch plan approval and recommend that these be conditions of final approval and covenants filed to run with the land. Several issues which the Board may wish to consider are as follows: additional driveways should be limited due to the undulating topography and significant vegetation on the site. It appears as though Aborn Lane is a recognized and designated private road, and will continue to be used by Lot 3. The south driveway however appears to simply be placed between the Hohn and Trombone sites. Accordingly, as an alternate routhe, you may wish to consider specifying, that if an additional driveway must be constructed for Lots 1 and 2, that 1t be a shared driveway / traversing the minimum distance accross Lot to gain access to Aborn Lane. This could a common driveway to serve both Lots 1 and 2. The Board may wish to include additional conditions of subdivision approval as a means of minimizing potential environmental impacts. The placement and design of the structure and driveway on Lot 1 could disrupt site resources, cause visual impacts, impact steep slope areas, and/or cause potential erosion. These impacts cannot be determined until the lot design is established; however, the definition of a specific building envelop would ensure that site use occurs in the least sensitive area. Further, it may be appropriate to restrict use of natural areas of lots Page 1 of 2 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Hohn Minor Subdivision Long EAF Review beyond the "non-use area", through the imposition of covenants and vegetated setbacks. I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to continue review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very t ly urs, arles J. oorhis enc: Part I/II LEAF CRAMER, V OCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Page 2of2 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: March 11, 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Minor Subdivision Harry G. & Janet Hohn SEQR Status: Type I Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves the subdivision of a 7.368 acre parcel into three (3) single family residential lots. Two of the three lots contain existing dwellings. There is a bulkhead along the unimproved lot on Great Peconic Bay. Individual wells and sanitary systems are proposed. SCTM Number: District 1000 - Section 118 - Block 06 -Lots 1 & 3.1 Location: The site is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Aborn Lane (Private Road), and Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, New York. Page 1 of 2 Minor Subdivision-Hohn SEQR Determination Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: 1) The subject property is zoned R-40, allowing lots of 40,000 square feet or greater. The use involves 3 lots on 7.368 acres, and an average lot size of 2.456 acres, or 0.41 units per acre. 2) The proposed project conforms to the density standards for single family residential development established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, in order to protect groundwater. The project is consistent with groundwater management guidelines as outlined to the 208 Study, SC Sanitary Code Article 6, and considered by the Town of Southold in review of the project. 3) The site contains important resources including a freshwater pond, shoreline along Great Peconic Bay, and areas with slopes in excess of 30 percent. Two of the lots already contain dwellings, and therefore the intensity of use will not be increased. One site will be developed in the future. There is a sufficient building envelop on this site to permit environmentally sound development. A building envelop will be established through the subdivision review process in order to ensure that site use occures in the least sensitive areas. 4) Additional conditions which are aspects of the project and/or are reflected on the map in order to minimize environmental impacts include: a. There is to be no further subdivision of any lot in perpetuity. b. The designated non-use area is to be left in its natural state. C. If additional access should be necessary, Lots 1 and 2 shall share a common driveway which traverses across Lot 2, to Aborn Lane. d. Lot 3 shall continue to have access over Aborn Lane For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board Address: Town Hall, Main Road, Southold Phone No.: (516) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Applicant-Harry G. & Janet Hohn Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Trustees Southold Town Building Department Page 2 of 2 r � PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ^ . SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman v®`°�+1� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �l ', Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 26, 1991 John M. Wagner Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 E. Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Harry & Janet Hohn SCTM#1000-118-6-1-3 . 1 Dear Mr. Wagner: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 25, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this Type 1 action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very �, truly yours � bkil (/-( Q 1-t Bennett Orlowski, Chairman cc: Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Southold Town Board Suffolk County Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook CRAMER, V R OCIATES 'S ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS February 15, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road FEB 1 9 1991 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Harry C. and Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1 & 3.1 Dear Benny: As per the your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with your correspondence of January 16, 1991. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The project represents a low intensity use of land. We are in full agreement with the conditions of sketch plan approval and recommend that these be conditions of final approval and covenants filed to run with the land. Several issues which the Board may wish to consider are as follows: It is imperative that no additional access roads or driveways be created to access lots. Undulating topography and significant vegetation on the site would experience significant adverse environmental impacts if this were to occur. It appears as though Aborn Lane is a recognized and designated private road. The south driveway however appears to simply be placed between the Hone and Trombone sites. Accordingly,you may wish to consult the Town Attorney as to the legality of requiring that the applicant for a subdivision utilize an adjacent lot for access. At a minimum, it seems as though a deeded right-of-way or limited use agreement should be presented to the Board to demonstrate a means of alternate access for both Aborn Lane and the Hohn/Trombone driveway. The Board may wish to include additional conditions of subdivision approval as a means of minimizing potential environmental impacts. The placement and design of the structure and driveway on Lot 1 could disrupt site resources, cause visual impacts, impact steep slope areas, and/or cause potential erosion. These impacts cannot be determined until the lot design is established. It would seem see Ltd Page I of 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516)`331-1455 Hohn Minor Subdivision Long EAF Review E to require that a Grading Site Plan be submitted in connection with the Building Permit, for further review by the Planning Board prior to issuance of said building permit. Further, it may be appropriate to restrict use of natural areas of lots beyond the "non-use area", through the imposition of covenants. I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to continue review of thisproject. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Veurs, harles . oorhis enc: Part I/II LEAF Determination of Significance CRAMER, VSOCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Page 2 of 2 SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Nan-Significance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board- of oard of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: February 25, 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Minor Subdivision Harry G. & Janet Hohn SEQR Status: Type I Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves the subdivision of a 7.368 acre parcel into three (3) single family residential lots. Two of the three lots contain existing dwellings. There is a bulkhead along the unimproved lot on Great Peconic Bay. Individual wells and sanitary systems are proposed. SCTM Number: District 1000 - Section 118 - Block 06 -Lots 1 & 3.1 Location: The site is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Aborn Lane (Private Road), and Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, New York. Pagel of 2 Minor Subdivision-Hohn SEQR Determination Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: 1) The subject property is zoned R-40, allowing lots of 40,000 square feet or greater. The use involves 3 lots on 7.368 acres, and an average lot size of 2.456 acres, or 0.41 units per acre. 2) The proposed pro'ect conforms to the density standards for single family residential development established by the Suffolk County Department ioundwat Health Servicesin order toprotectgroundwater. Te projectsconsistent withermanagement guidelines as outlied in the 208 Study, SC Sanry Code Article 6, and considered by the Town of Southold in review of the project. 3) The site contains important resources including a freshwater pond, shoreline along Great Peconic Bay, and areas with slopes in excess of 30 percent. Two of the lots already contain dwellings, and therefore the intensity of use will not be increased. One site will be developed in the future. There is a sufficient building envelop on this site to permit environmentally sound development; however, a Grading Site Plan is required to be submitted in connection with the Building Permit in order to ensure proper site utilization. 4) Additional conditions which are aspects of the project and/or are reflected on the map in order to minimize environmental impacts include: a. There is to be no further subdivision of any lot in pe etuity. b. The designated non-use area is to be left in its natural state. C. Lot 1 is to have access over the existing driveway which is partly located on land owned now or formerly by Mario and Ilse Trombone. d. Lots 2 and 3 are to have access over Aborn Lane. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board Address: Town Hall, Main Road, Southold Phone No.: (516) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Applicant-Harry G. &Janet Hohn Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Trustees Southold Town Building Department Page 2 of 2 1� 617.21 ? _... SEAR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ' Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderlu-;�Hanner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant isnot always-easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formai knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions` Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: �1 Part 1 X Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and`2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.` ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions MINOR SUBDIVISION OF HARRY G. 8 JANET HOHN Name of Action Planning Board, Town of Southold Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATIUN Prepared by Project Sponsor NO ICF This docunient is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Minor Subdivision of Harry G. & Janet Hohn LOCATION OF ACTION(include Street Address,Municipality and County) Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, Suffolk County, New York NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Harry G. & Janet Hohn (212 ) 576 - 5077 ADDRESS New York Life Insurance Co. , 51 Madison Avenue CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE New York I NY 10010 NAME OF OhNER(if different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE da McKnight Kolbe ( ) ADDRESS 631 Bentley Drive CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Naples 3 FL 33963 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivision of a 7.368 acre parcel into #mar- single-family residential lots. Two of the three proposed -wfil Fre It lots contain existing dwellings. There is a bulkhead along the unimproved waterfront parcel's frontage on Great Pecanic Bay. Individual wells and sanitary systems are proposed. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ■Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 7.368 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested 4.66 acres 3.69 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) • 1 acres • 1 acres Water Surface Area .87 acres •87 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) earth drives/beach .86 acres •86 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces . 12 acres • 72 acres Other (Indi(ate type)_ landscaped areas .76 — acres 1 •13 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Plymouth loamy sand: Riverhead sandy loam & beach a. Soil drainage: ■Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site []Poorly drained _ % of site h. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS I:and Classification System? NIA acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes ONO a. What is depth to bedrock? 7 "L (in feet) 2 1 • . i� Approximate percentage of proposed projectsite with slopes: 60-10% 9 °o ■10-15% 15 ■15% or greater 10 % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ::Yes ENO 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ONO 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-31 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Eyes [:]No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes ENO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatenVj4-'cr )endangered? ❑Yes ONO According to T`lr-_�A ZA1y46_Z-7_11VAJ R/ lL"sQ Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Eyes ❑No Describe A bluff and beach exist along portions of the property's frontage on Creat Peconic Bay 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? :]Yes ENO If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes ONO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Unnamed tidal pond S creek a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Creat Peconic Bay 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Creat Peconic Bay b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Eyes ❑No a) If Yes, does.sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Eyes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Eyes ONO 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 3047 []Yes =No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6172 Eyes ONO 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes ENO B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 7.368 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 7.368 acres initially; 7.368 acres ultimately. C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped none acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 12 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 4 Ultimately 4 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure _M height; unknow width;unknown length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 330 ft. 3 2. I low much natural material (i e . rock, earth, etc.) will be removed frdm the site?indeterminate.,,;/cubic yards 3. Will dislurbed areas be reclaimed? AYes -- f]No ❑N/A a. If yrs, for what intend , purpose is the site being reclaimed? Landscaped areas around dwellings b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes ❑No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ■Yes ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? •97 acres 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years olt?) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes. MNo & If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 12 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N/A .� a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. L, d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ❑No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes MNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction _ None ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project None . '1 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes /No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ■No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ■Yes t,❑No Type Household sanitary wastes 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ■No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Eyes ❑No 16 Will the project generate solid waste? Eyes ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month 1 .4 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ■Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name Southold Municipal Landfill ; location Cutehogue d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes MNo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes ■No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tors/month. K If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes MNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes MNo 20 Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes MNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Eyes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) Electricite: fossil fuels 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23 Total anticipated water usage per day 1200 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes MNo If Yes, explain . 4 25.•Approvais Required: • 09 • 4 Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village 3oard CYes --No City. Town, Y+Hw-,e Planning Board Eyes �❑No subdivision 2/6/90 City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ONO CitT, County Health Department Eyes ONO wells E sanitary Other Local Agencies (Suffolk Cnty ■Yes "No subdivision Planning Commission L❑ Other Regional Agencies Yes ONO State Agencies (NYSDEC) Eyes ❑No Tidal Wetlands Permit Federal Agencies ❑Yes ONO C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ■Yes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ■subdivision ❑site plan ❑newjrevision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? It may be possible to create an add'l lot given present tonin restrictions. (However, thea lican is not interested in pursuin that alternative. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site. N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Oyes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/. mile radius of proposed action? R-40• single-family residential 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoiningisurrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? Eyes ONO 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 1 . 127 acres 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ■No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ■Yes ONO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ■Yes ONO 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes RNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ONO D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Harry C. Hohn by William W. Esseks Date A11a�5t 10, 199 Signature -I- — Title Contract Vendee If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 t. f 2 PROJECT IMPACTS AND t , ZIR oiAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In cornpleting the form the reviewer should be guided by the question. [lave my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be. an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) (foes not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. - • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples, and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) r a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. h. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1 d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3 A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to,,th ,project site? RANO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Moot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for ruining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ E-1 Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ LJ Yes El No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2 Will there he ;in effect t:. -..ry unique or unusual land��foJviis found on the situ? (i e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, et OYES • Sperifir land forme �// �� ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 7 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER LModerate all to Potential Can Impact Be 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Large Mitigated By (Under Articles 15, 24, 2 pac 5 of the Environmental ConserU n Law. ECL) Impact Project Change O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 / \\ • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existi g r new body of water? O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ []Yes []No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ El Yes []No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ C1 Yes 11 No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ []Yes No existing body of water to '.',e extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ C ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or pattgmy or surface water runoff? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • ['reposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0 N • Other impacts: _ ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0 N hour. • Proposed .Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat sourre. producing more than 10 million BFU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: - ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non endangered species? LINO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nu of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO DYES Examples that world apply to column 2 • [lie proposer) action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 - • i • 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ El Yes El No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No of agricultural land or, If located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm .field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCE 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? O .AYES pf necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Sec ion 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ :]Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Pr000sed land uses, or project components visible to users of " ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure 0istoric, pre- historic or paleontological importance? O EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ _'fes [I No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No I IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or j future open spaces or recreational opportunities? ��' i Examples that would apply to column 2 NO EYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational ppor unity. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ []Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes []No 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportations�st�'u? Moderate Large Mitigated By ANO ❑YES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ONO • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's sou�rc�s of fuel or energy supply? KN(0 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • ['reposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ El Yes ONO transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • 011ier impacts: ❑ ❑ EJ Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibrati_ op as a result of the Proposed Action? 3�NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and saf>ty �fNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 / \ • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No substances(i e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "ha7ardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No form If e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed artion may result in the excavation or other disturhance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El NO within 1,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • nlher impacts: _ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El NO 10 • 0 1 2 1 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the exis n ommunity? Impact Impact Project Change NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services Cl ❑ El Yes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ 7—Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ []Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 19 Is there, or is there likely to be. public controrsJ' related to potential adverse environmental impacts? IIOYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 40 '5U'er1LE- CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT Hs Cutchogue, N.Y. Telephone 11935 (516)734-6907 February 8, 1991 Mr Bennet Orlowski, Jr. Southold Town Planning Bd. Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Ref. Harry & Janet Hohn Dear Mr. Orlowski, Reference the above estate and map. It is the opinion of the Board that a well is not required at this time. If there are any changes, please advise. Yours truly, Board of Fire Commissioners Matthew J. Martin Secretary mjm/ FEB ! 3 I99t FRAMER, VO�Hf �� / IATES • �G/� iNVI"NMENTAL A Ft 4 5ULTANTS IK• FAX TRANSMITTAL �j— Fax �NumOcr (510) 901-0045 To: s c,4 From: �thl7s ' FEB 15 1991 Number of Pages (including cover): If tho total transmittal is not rcccived cull number below. CommenlMMs: /lict.issA/ errs ��� � Yvcr2 vsF�" .QA�irs � ��` wicc. �6- M•9-�� . 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MIbLER PLACE. NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 T 9 d s r =+ os stf M s ! 4 CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PtANtJI(VG CONSULTANTS wi i February 15, 1991 Mr, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 FB 1 - 1991 Re: Harry C. and Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1 & 3.1 Dear Benny: As per the your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with your correspondence of January 16, 1991. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. Theproject represents a low intensity use of land. We are in full agreement with the conditions of sketch plan approval and recommend that these be conditions of final approval and covenants filed to run with the land: Several issues which the Board mayy wish to consider are as follows: It is imperative that no additional access roads or drivewa s be created to access lots. Undulating topography and significant vegetation on the site would experience significant adverse environmental impacts if this were to occur. It appears as though Aborn Lane is a recognized and designated private road. The south driveway however appears to simply be placed between the Hone and Trombone sites, Accordingly, you may wish to consult the Town Attorney as to the legality of requiring that the applicant for a subdivision utilize an adjacent lot for access. At a minimum, it seems as though a deeded rigbt-of-way or limited use agreement should be presented to the Board to demonstrate a means of alternate access for both .Aborn Lane and the Hohn/Trombone driveway, The Board may wish to include additional conditions of subdivision approval as a means of minimizing potential environmental impacts. The placement and design of the structure and driveway on Lot 1 could disrupt site resources, cause visual impacts, impact steep slope areas, and/or cause potentia] erosion. These impacts cannot be determined until the lot design is established. It would seem ACS upkis:&d fepj.t Page 1 ort 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 Hohn Minor Subdivision Tong EAF Review prudent to require that a Grading Site Plan be submitted in connection with the Building Permit, for further review by the Planning Board prior to issuance of said building permit. Further, it may be appropriate to restrict use of natural areas of lots beyond the "non-use area", through the imposition of covenants. I hope this letterrovides the board with the information needed to continue review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Ve urs, Com, o� harles oorhis enc: Part I/II LEAF Determination of Significance CRAMER, V —� OCIATES Page zotZ ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: February 25, 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Minor Subdivision Harry G. & Janet Hohn SEQR Status: Type I Action Project Description: Theroject which is the subject of this Determination, involves the subdivision of a 7.368 acre parcel into three (3) single family residential lots. Two of the three lots contain existing dwellings. There is a bulkhead along the unimproved lot on Great Peconic Bay. Individual wells and sanitary systems are proposed. SCTM Number: District 1000 - Section 118 - Block 06 -Lots 1 & 3.1 Location: The site is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Aborn Lane (Private Road), and Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, New York. Page I of t b G7 - J C �. ..'. e 6 u au t , U ! .". rJ s4 • J .0 W it J ^l `f C - i - T � � T C C T � Q �J -1 Minor Subdivision • Hohn SEQR Determinutlon Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: 1) The subject property is zoned R-40, allowing lots of 40,000 square feet or greater. The use involves 3 lots on 7.368 acres, and an average lot size of 2.456 acres, or 0.41 units per acre. 2) The proposed pro ect conforms to the density standards for single family residential development established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, in order to protect groundwater. The project is consistent with groundwater management guidelines as outlined in the 208 Study, SC Sanitary Code Article 6, and considered by the Town of Southold in review of the project, 3) The site contains important resources including a freshwater pond, shoreline along Great Peconic Bay, and areas with slopes in excess of 30 percent. Two of the lots already contain dwellings, and therefore the intensity of use will not be increased. One site will be developed in the future. There is a sufficient building envelop on this site to permit environmentally sound development; however, a Grading Site Plan is required to be submitted in connection with the Building Permit in order to ensure proper site utilization. 4) Additional conditions which are aspects of the project and/or are reflected on the map in order to minimize environmental impacts include: a. There is to be no further subdivision of any lot in perpetuity. b. The designated non-use area is to be left in its natural state. C. Lot 1 is to have access over the existing driveway which is partly located on land owned now or formerly by Mario and Ilse Trombone. d. Lots 2 and 3 are to have access over Aborn Lane. For Further Information: Contact person: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board Address: Town Hall, Main Road, Southold Phone No.: (516) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Applicant-Harry G. & Janet Hohn Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Trustees Southold Town Building Department Page 2 or 2 .. .ra' P - .-1 E .. %� .� � c u .ro...••_E , U J O O h r J i W C. J "'1 l C a T T V J T C �. C.t a A '-A J r. � z PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ; F: ^' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman y��: O� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 14, 1991 John M. Wagner Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Harry & Janet Hohn SCTM#1000-118-6-1-3 .1 Dear Mr. Wagner: The enclosed report dated February 7, 1991, from the Suffolk County Planning Commission will be reviewed at the Planning Board' s February 25, 1991 public meeting. You are not required to attend this meeting. Please note that this report is for your information only. It has not been adopted by the Planning Board. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 111Wf Chairman Encl. EOUNTY OF SUFFOLK SGfGF 46 r�-tS PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING February 7, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board - Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - Harry & Janet Hohn Southeasterly corner of Nassau Point Road and Aborn Lane, Nassau Point, Town of Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on February 6, 1991, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Harry & Janet Hohn" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. After due study and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following conditions deemed necessary for good planning and land use. 1. No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 3. Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots 1, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision. 4. No new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of existing bulkhead. 5. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be discharged into the adjoining bodies of water. VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE LI..NEW YORK 11788 131 81 360-5192 Page -2- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. Erosion and sediment control measures shall be required during and immediately after construction on Lot No. 1 to insure that stormwater runoff will not carry eroded and other deleterious materials into the tidal wetlands bordering Great Peconic Bay and the adjoining pond. 7. Conditions 3 and 4, shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval to this subdivision. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 8. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's office which affects lots in this subdivision. The Commission also offers the following comments on the map for your use and consideration: 1. The map of this minor subdivision should be filed in the office of the County Clerk. This is to insure the validity of the subdivision map and that the subdivision map will be available to the general public in a central office of official records. 2. According to a map that was received from the State of New York this property appears to be located within an area that is considered to be archaeologically sensitive. Many sites contain material and/or buildings that are of prehistoric or historic value. These sites should be preserved or developed with a sensitivity for historic or cultural values that can be available for the appreciation of future generations. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of/P,Planning by CCE , ._ Fr nk Dowling 81 . Planner Subdivision Re4iew Division File: S-SD-91-01 FD:mb cc: J. Baier, C.E., SCDHS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK SuGF q PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING February 7, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board - 8 1991 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - Harry & Janet Hohn Southeasterly corner of Nassau Point Road and Aborn Lane, Nassau Point, Town of Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on February 6, 1991, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Harry & Janet Hohn" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. After due study and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following conditions deemed necessary for good planning and land use. 1. No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 3. Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots 1, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision. 4. No new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of existing bulkhead. 5. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be discharged into the adjoining bodies of water. VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, L.L. NEW YORK 1 1 baa (316)360-3192 Page -2- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. Erosion and sediment control measures shall be required during and immediately after construction on Lot No. 1 to insure that stormwater runoff will not carry eroded and other deleterious materials into the tidal wetlands bordering Great Peconic Bay and the adjoining pond. 7. Conditions 3 and 4, shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval to this subdivision. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 8. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's office which affects lots in this subdivision. The Commission also offers the following comments on the map for your use and consideration: 1. The map of this minor subdivision should be filed in the office of the County Clerk. This is to insure the validity of the subdivision map and that the subdivision map will be available to the general public in a central office of official records. 2. According to a map that was received from the State of New York this property appears to be located within an area that is considered to be archaeologically sensitive. Many sites contain material and/or buildings that are of prehistoric or historic value. These sites should be preserved or developed with a sensitivity for historic or cultural values that can be available for the appreciation of future generations. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning by Fr nk owling r. Planner Subdivision R iew Division File: S-SD-91-01 FD:mb cc: J. Baier, C.E. , SCDHS New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 (516) 751-7900 X346 January 24, 1991 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner E3G/(C Mr. Richard Van de Kieft PL's John J. Raynor, P.C. P.O. Box 720 Water Mill , NY 11976 RE: NYSDEC Application No. 1-4738-00203/00001-0 H. G. and J. Hohn Nassau Point Dear Mr. Van de Kieft : Please be advised that the Southold Town Planning Board has requested to be lead agency on this matter and this request has been granted by NYSDEC. Therefore, processing of the application before the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation cannot be completed until the lead agency has either issued a negative determination or until a draft environmental impact statement has been accepted by the lead agency and filed with this office pursuant to Section 617.3(e) of the SEQR Regulations (6 NYCRR, Part 617) . Please submit the information that the lead agency may require to comply with the provisions of SEQR. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours , Robert N. Thurber Sr. Environmental Analyst RNT cc: v' f�Rq � '� i991 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Tuti uk�,r �v�lssi 5uBFc.. MS 93095 Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATIONRESPONSE paV (j i 61h-, i9SCT- Aio (ODZJ" ��!lSf-(o �/ Dear Wig�pi'ro 2e Se J,eH�Cz Su.vr.�� v �� 9.. j(1 GSC I K1U 3(6(4- This a{rThis 99letter responds to your communication �y/ regarding lead agency coordination for the above-noted project, under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. The Department has the following interest in this project: DEC Permits (if any) : TcQ4 ( (��{(� c0_z //��` y.y N\1S7tC, N'o / -q_73�-fSUV-03/ooaoi - U PI1 QlOQ YU wu y � 1 A {M.(nC', {1U W� iN [I Cpy �w1UH/C4 Lt J (✓/ NYJQZ� DEC Contact Person: t�064, r �J . ;kAltV 10,P / SEQR Classification: [K] Type I 4-4—o„ii w , Ct /1 DEC Position: Based on the information provided: [N DEC has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ] DEC needs additional information in order to respond (see comments) . ] DEC cannot be lead agency because it has no jurisdiction in this action. Comments: [ ] see attached QC] none If you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above, please contact this office to resolve designation of lead agency within the time allowable under Part 617 . Please feel free to contact this office for further information or discussion. ,Sincerely, cc; (attach distribution list) .MN 2 8 1991 9960 South Ocean Drive Aparment #1404 Jensen Beach, F1 . 34957 (407) 229-3194 January 21 . 1991 Re: Proposed subdivision SCTM 1000-118-6-1 , 3 .1 by Harry G. and Janet Hohn Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 Dear Planning Board Members: We are appreciative of the attention and efforts of the Planning Board in connection with the proposed Hohn subdivision. I understand that there has been some action taken by the Board on the basis of a revised site sketch dated January 9, 1991 submitted by the applicants Hohn. We wish to note our objections to lines drawn and designations made thereon which intrude on our property. Our inability to attend at any calendar involving this proposed subdivision is not to be interpreted as acquiescence in or approval of the boundaries and designations drawn on that site sketch of January 9, 1991 . We anticipate that any intrusion on our property should and will be a matter for legal determination by our courts. Any position or silence at this time should not prejudice such legal rights. � n Re�p�ctfully y"rs, 4 GE A/ BUR.. l� JAN 2 5 1991 o � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 Supervisor Southold, New York ✓; � '� ,� Fax (516) 765-1823 119710! Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 6f)�- �S 1994 Mathew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Martin: _ Enclosed please find ( 2) surveys go N// Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by 6 ,199f. Thank you for your cooperation. �ery trul D your14 � , Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. hp Mir PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 'Z SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman V� ,�► '� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ��� Richard G. Ward �O! =� Town Hall. 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 16 , 1991 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Harry G. & Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1 & 3 .1 Dear Mr. Cramer and Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. The Planning Board has received the $400. 00 review fee from the applicant. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very tyours�V"' Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman �1S enc. 7&% , m one ���" ASSOCIATES, I N C. j A D V E R T I S I N G � P U BLIC RELATIONS E V E N T S M A R K E T I N G January 8, 1991 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11917 Re: Hohn Subdivision To whom it may concern: This is to certify that Mr. and Mrs. Harry Hohn have been neighbors of the undersigned at 9840 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, for approximately one year. During this period, the Hohns have been exemplary in their careful treatment of our adjoining property lines as in similar matters involving the land. I understand that Mr. Hohn has requested a subdivision of his property and from my understanding of his plans, I have no hesitation in endorsing his ran , e .AN j 4 5 0 PARK AVENUE S O U T H , NEW Y O R K , NY 1 0 0 1 6 T E L ( 2 1 2 ) 6 8 4 - 2 0 1 0 F A X ( 2 1 2 ) 6 8 4 - 6 3 8 3 �+�lS r SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM# : COMMENTS: JAN 199/ �s SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: �02� ✓��' �`�� . SCTM# : COMMENTS:/ pp JAN 1 5 FA ; r PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS -7m i � SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman a/�q "� �.`'.;'J Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. •. Richard G. Ward �f ;,°�' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 15, 1991 John M. Wagner Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision of Harry C. and Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-6-1=51 Dear Mr. Wagner: -/ 3 ' The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 14, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the Lead Agency coordination process on this Type I action. This action is classified as a Type I action because the property is located within a Critical Environmental Area. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated January 7, 1991, with the following conditions: 1. There is to be no further subdivision of any lot in perpetuity. 2. The non-use area is to be left in its natural state. 3 . Lot 1 is to have access over the existing driveway which is partly located on land owned now or formerly by Mario and Ilse Trombone. 4. Lot 2 and 3 are to have access over Aborn Lane. Page 2 Harry C. and Janet Hohn Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. Five ( 5) paper prints and two ( 2) mylars of the final map, containing a current stamp of Health Department approval, must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. The Planning Board is requiring that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions be filed including the above mentioned conditions of sketch approval. This subdivision has been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for their review. You will be notified should additional covenants and restrictions be required. For that reason, a draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions should be submitted after the Planning Board has reviewed the Suffolk County Planning Commission report. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, 34W U Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 3 ?{ Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward a3 ' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUT TOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Ugnuar%1 IS 191L RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: ttArry A s Tend IAQ'M„ S(=r/n It IDoo- 119 - r - I ♦ 3 1 Requested Action: 1�es"A6aM-i %AL ( SiorJ o•� le{ S on 7.3(,5? aerec TZ go zorxQ SEQRA Classification: ( X ) Type I Cw Y1„nt Cr;�:crQ Er vera„rnarC�+�Q FFrv� ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: NQk-'sa S taa ( 516) -765-1938 • i The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (�( ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below) . Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman S CC: Board of Appeals *Board of Trustees Southold Town Board '%Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services 'KNYSDEC - Stony Brook •.a v max- T U-9, TC Ar-my r C f E Dept Transport atiok4 * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies 14-16 (2187)-7c 617.21 , ! - SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review ! r FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM I` 3 Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an order) "? PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NO 1111 F: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will he considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Minor Subdivision of Harry G. & Janet Hohn LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Nassau Point Road, Cutc__hogue, Suffolk County, New York NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Harry G. & Janet Hohn (212 ) 576 - 5077 ADDRESS New York Life Insurance Co., 51 Madison Avenue CITY/PO r STATE ZIP CODE New York NY 10010 NAME OF OJJNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Eda McKnight Kolbe ( ) ADDRESS 631 Bentley Drive CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Naples FL 33963 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivision of a 7.368 acre parcel into four (4) single-family residential lots. Two of the three proposed waterfront lots contain existing dwellings. There is a bulkhead along the unimproved waterfront parcel's frontage on Great Peconic Bay. The fourth lot is upland. Individual wells and sanitary systems are proposed. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ■Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 7.368 acres. APPROXIMAIE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested 4.66 acres 3.69 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) . 1 acres • 1 acres Water Surface Area •87 acres •87 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) earth drives/beach 86 acres .86 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces . 12 acres �72 acres Other (Indicate type) landscaped areas . 76 acres 1 .13 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Plymouth loamy sand: Riverhead sandy loam & beach a. Soil drainage: ■Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained _ % of site h. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS I and Classification System? h[_A_ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Dyes ONO a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage or proposedoject site with slopes: ■0-104% 75 C. ■10-15% 15 % ■15% or greater 10 % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers or Historic Places? ❑Yes ENO 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ",Yes ■No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0'31 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Eyes ONO 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes ENO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? :]Yes ENO According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Eyes r'No Describe A bluff and beach exist along portions of the property's frontage on Creat Peconic Bay 13. ;s the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? :]Yes ENO If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? 7—Yes ENO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Unnamed tidal pond S creek a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Creat Peconic Bay 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Qreat Peconic Bay b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? oyes ONO a) If Yes, does.sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Eyes ONO b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Eyes ONO 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes ENO 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Eyes ONO 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes ENO B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 7.368 acres. b. Proiect acreage to be developed: 7.368 acres initially; 7.368 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped none acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing _ N/A proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 12 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: Initially One 4 Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Ultimately 4 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure _35 height; unknown width; unknown length. I. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 330 ft. 3 2. flow much natural material (i e , rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site?in_determinate,-3/cubic yards 3. Will dishuhed areas be reclaimed? AYes _' ❑No ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intend , purpose is the site being reclaimed? Landscaped areas around dwellings b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Eyes ❑No ' c. Will upper subsoil he stockpiled for reclamation? Eyes ONo 4. Ilow many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? •97 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years olti) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes. ■No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 12 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. c d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ❑No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes ■No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ----None-; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project None 3 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes MNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ■No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ■Yes i []No Type Household sanitary wastes 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ■No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? MYes ❑No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Eyes ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month 1 .4 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Eyes ❑No c. If yes, give name Southold Municipal Landfill ; location Cutchogue d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ®No P. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ■No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes ■No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes ®No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? OYes ■No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Eyes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) Electricity__fossil fuels 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23 Total anticipated water usage per day 1200 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Oyes ■No If Yes, explain - 4 25. AQprovais Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, bi!lage 3oard =Yes �:No E4+v, Town. 'e4Hage Planning Board ■Yes --No subdivision 2/6/90 City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ONO C-i", County Health Department Eyes ONO wells & sanitary Other Local Agencies (Suffolk Cnty Eyes ONO subdivision Planning Commission) Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ONO State Agencies (NYSDEC) Eyes ❑No Tidal Wetlands Permit Federal Agencies ❑Yes ONO C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Eyes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: —zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ■subdivision ❑site plan ❑newlrevision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? It may be possible to create an add'l lot given present zonin restrictions. (However, thea lican is not interested in pursuing! that alternative. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site. N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plarts? oyes ONO 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/. mile radius of proposed action? R-40; single-family residential 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/. mile? Eyes ONO 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 1 .127 acres 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ENO 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Eyes ONO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Eyes ONO 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes /No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ONO D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Harry G. Hohn by William W. Esseks Date August 10. 199.0 Signature Wxw• W I&Wvf I Title Contract Vendee If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 f< t 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND 4. cIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert enviromnental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must he evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. _ • [lie Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples, and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. h. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3 e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? LINO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 'I5% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No "foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ C1 Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2 Will there be rni effect t . -..ry unique or unusual land forms found on the sit(,?(I.C, cliffs, duties, geological formations, etc.)❑NO OYES • Specific land forms - ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 4 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) CNO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ []Yes L7-No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ Eyes []No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes 07 No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ F-1 Yes []No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ENO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ Dyes No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No have approval to serve proposed (project) action.. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ []Yes []No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes F-1 No • Liquid effluent will be conveye?off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0N do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ 1-1 Yes (-]No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ C]Yes ❑No existing body of wale; to .i,e extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast :o natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ Dyes []No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ 11 Eyes ❑No ( 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ El yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ El Yes- ❑No • Other impacts _ ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ El Yes []No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered Species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non endangered species? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • the proposer) action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0N land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of Cl ❑ Eyes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ Cl ❑Yes []No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm _ .field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ Dyes C1 No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially Cl ❑ 11 Yes []No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. _ • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ —res ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or i future open spaces or recreational opportunities? i Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Cl ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ F-1 Yes ❑No 9 c I 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ❑NO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No .IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (snore than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ EJ Yes ❑No substances(i.e, oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of arrident or upset conditions, or there may he a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No form (ie. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑NO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No — 10 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact ImpaCT Project Change ❑NO "YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ Eyes 11 No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than S% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ Eyes []No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [-]No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 71 No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? []NO ❑YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 14.14-1 i I.a7,-9c ' 617.21 SEAR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) i Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-1/4 1/4-'/2 1/2-3 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available Cl ❑ Cl Cl ❑ jto the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cl Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ Cl • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ Cl Cl ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such Cl ❑ Cl Cl Cl as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ Cl Cl or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑l Cl 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(i.e., screened by summer,foliage, but visible during other seasons) Dyes ❑No i 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ❑No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question I, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within #1/* mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *Yz mile ❑Yes 1-1 No *1 miles ❑Yes ❑No *2 miles El Yes 1-1 No *3 miles ❑Yes ❑No • Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by, residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ — 2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS uy T q SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. l'�� Richard G. Ward 'i I�t7 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 10, 1991 John M. Wagner Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Harry G. & Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1 & 3 .1 Dear Mr. Wagner: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $400. 00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of Long Environmental Assessment Forms. The above mentioned sum must be paid in full by your client before we can authorize our consultant to proceed with the review. The check should be made payable to the Town of Southold. When the consultants complete their review, the Planning Board will consider their findings in making a determination of whether the project will have a significant environmental impact. Very t'rnuly yours, '& lyC��i /1 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Ans Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o t} '�T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Richie Latham, Jr. `sem it - -- , Richard G. Ward ' 1 ' , r+ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 8, 1991 John M. Wagner Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Subdivision Application for Harry C. and Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1, 3 . 1 Dear Mr. Esseks: On December 28, 1990, Melissa Spiro met with Mr. and Mrs.Hohn to discuss their proposed subdivision. Mr. Hohn presented a "sketch" map that he had prepared. He had revised the map to show, among other amendments, three ( 3 ) lots rather than four ( 4 ) , and a conservation easement adjacent to the Hurley lot. The Planning Board reviewed the above mentioned map at their last work session. It is in favor of restricting the use of the land to the north of the Hurley parcel (approximately 23 , 645 square feet) , by placing a conservation easement on this area. Although the actual Hurley lot will not be one acre in size, the land area equivalent to making this lot one acre, will be restricted from development. Also discussed at the meeting with Melissa was a proposal to change the configuration of Lot 3 , so that this lot would also contain part of the pond. The Board is not in favor of splitting the ownership of the pond. An easement over Lot 2 should be granted to Lot 3 for access to the beach. In addition, the Board is not in favor of any additional curb cuts on Nassau Point Road. Lot 1 is to have access over the existing driveway which is partly located on land owned now or formerly by Mario and Ilse Trombone. The Zoning Board of Appeal' s approval will be necessary to legalize this access. Their approval will be required also for access to Lots 2 and 3 . As stated in previous correspondence, the Board will be requiring that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions be filed stating that Lot 1 is not to be further subdivided in perpetuity. It should be noted, also, that the final maps must be prepared at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet. Upon submission of revised maps, the Board will continue with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Chairman cc: William W. Esseks, Attorney for Applicant Gerard P. Goehringer, Zoning Board of Appeals v MS SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: film e �[K�s ' SUBJECT: SCTM# : O _ COMMENTS: AA J JAN - 9 1991 •.S�fBFiGE" its SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: / SCTM# : COMMENTS: 71991 A 5u8FiC� A4 ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 106 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Boz 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (516) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELE%-EHCA 6652316 UW P. 0. BOX 570 TELECOPIER NUMBER (516) 369-2065 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 JANE ANN R. KRAT2 (516) 726-6633 JOHN M. WAGNER WILLIAM POWER MALONEY ALAN D. OSHRIN THOMAS F.WHELAN OF COUNSEL December 19 , 1990 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Ms. Melissa Spiro, Planner Re: Subdivision Application for Harry C. and Janet Hohn Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-118-6-1 and 3.1 Dear Melissa: Enclosed herewith please find a copy of a "Sketch of Revised Lot Layout" for the subject subdivision. I understand that you will discuss the enclosed with the Planning Board at their scheduled work session on December 27, 1990, and will further discuss the Board's thoughts with me following such meeting. If we do not speak in the interim, please enjoy the happiest of holidays. Very truly yours , A/lv/%� John M. Wagner JMW:pi Encs . �SUFFAL,YCOG` PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o ":~ m SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Vit >.+^�► " Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 10, 1990 William W. Esseks Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Subdivision Application for Harry C. and Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1, 3 .1 Dear Mr. Esseks: The Planning Board has reviewed the information submitted in reference to the above mentioned subdivision proposal. The Board will proceed with their review of the proposal when it receives revised maps showing the following: 1. The Hurley lot is to be incorporated into the subdivision layout. This lot is to conform to the minimum lot requirements of the district. The procedure to incorporate the Hurley lot is to be as follows: A revised subdivision map showing all proposed lots, including the Hurley lot, is to be submitted for review by the Planning Board. Upon acceptance of the map, a lot line change application is to be submitted to change the boundary of the Hurley lot. The Board will then proceed with their review of the subdivision proposal for the remainder of the property. 2. Lots 2 and 3 do not meet all minimum requv�ements of the bulk schedule for the R-40 District. `The layout must be revised so that all lots meet the minimum requirements. In addition, all flag lots must be 40,000 square feet in area excluding the area of the accessway. 3 . Approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals will be required for access to all proposed lots, with the exception of the Hurley lot. The Planning Board is not in favor of creating any additional curb cuts on Nassau Point Road. All lots must have access over either Aborn Lane or the existing driveway (provided the property owner(s) of the existing driveway allow the continued use of this driveway) . If the existing driveway, which is partly located on the adjacent property (owned now or formerly by Mario and Ilse Trombone) will be used for access to any of the proposed lots, 280A approval will be necessary to legalize this access. As stated above, the Board is not in favor of creating additional curb cuts, and would support the continued use of the existing driveway, provided the property owner(s) are in agreement. 4. The final maps must be prepared at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet, and must be filed in the office of the County Clerk. The Planning Board will proceed with their review upon receipt of revised maps. Upon submission of acceptable maps, the Environmental Assessment Form will be forwarded to the Town' s Environmental Consultant for review. An estimate for the cost of review will be obtained, and payment must be submitted by your client prior to the Consultant proceeding with the review. In addition, as per Section A106-38 (E) of the Subdivision Regulations, the Planning Board will be requiring a park and playground fee of two thousand dollars ( 2,000. 00 ) per lot for each vacant lot in the subdivision. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. � s Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Zoning Board of Appeals �s 9960 South Ocean Drive-Apt. *1404 Jensen Beach, F1. 34957 (407 ) 229-3194 November 17 , 1990 W)V2 0 Re: Proposed subdivision SCTH 1000-118-6-1 and 3. 1 by Harry G. and Janet Hohn Town of Southold Planning Board Hain Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 Dear Planning Board Members: Thank you for supplying a copy of the letter of William W. Esseks, attorney for the applicants, dated October 18, 1990 which I received on November 6, 1990. There is a time lapse of more than ten weeks for a response to my letter and objections of August 25, 1990 . I have been in court involved in trial of a case of great importance to a client since November 7th. The case still has not proceeded past jury selection and probably will not be concluded before the end of November. However my request for a few weeks delay to research and submit further objections was met with expressed doubts about granting any delay, although Hr. Esseks delay of a substantial number of weeks was acceptable. My inability to conduct such research is a handicap which I request be given consideration along with the following comments which are based on the letter which did not contain exhibits referred to. The long explanations in the Esseks letter of October 18, 1990 establish conclusively that the sketch plan submitted is clearly false, inaccurate and improper in that the boundaries and areas of what has been submitted admittedly have nothing to do with Filed Haps 745 and 156 which are the official maps of Nassau Point Club properties. Those are the maps which are before the Planning Board for consideration in approving subdivisions, and they are, indeed, relied upon and referred to on the Hohn sketch plan. In determining the extent of the subdivision of the original parcel the Hohn sketch clearly is misleading, improper, and not in conformity with the filed maps. The Hohn sketch shows only part of a single lot, which has already been broken up on at least three occasions. Hr. Esseks seeks to circumvent that fact by referring to what the Building Department has or has not done in the past and to ask the Planning Board, after the fact, to pretend that the Building Southold Planning Board November 17, 1990 -2- Department requirements supersede Planning Board functions. His argument seems to be that the Planning Board is bound by Building Department approval of various building plans submitted to that department over the years. To argue also that their acts can prevail over the original filed maps is improper and erroneous. Hr. Esseks has submitted nothing by way of fact to overcome the legitimacy of those maps which he would have the Planning Board ignore or vary for the sake of an improper sketch. The original subdivision map has not changed, but the prior subdivisions of the lot are not shown on the sketch. Despite the lengthy Esseks dissertation on Building Department decisions which deal with construction requirements, there is no justification for not setting forth the lot as shown on the maps and indicating prior unapproved subdivisions. He argues that Building Department decisions alter and supersede the official maps . He argues that past Building Department decisions should control present Planning Board decisions and requests that the Planning Board act to approve a sketch which does not show official filed map lot lines. The Building Department is not a Planning Board, and the Esseks argument that the defective sketch submitted should be accepted because of past Building Department decisions which relate to building requirements is hardly logical. The Planning Board should not waive or set aside its functions and guidelines for subdivision requirements to consider the sketch before it at the present time as a true representation of the facts. To reiterate, that sketch is improper in that it has not set forth lot lines which are in accordance with the official maps, 745 and 156 . The lengthy discussion of Building Department actions set forth in Hr. Esseks letter cannot overcome the fact that the sketch plan is defective . He is asking the Planning Board to ignore such defects, to ignore the boundaries laid out on the official maps, and to approve a subdivision based on an improper sketch. There are additional objections which can be submitted but due to the constraints of time, I am submitting this objection at this time to the sketch plan to avoid the possibility of construing my silence as assent to the sketch plan. For example, density, which Hr. Esseks discounts as minimal, is a consideration which is of maximal importance. The precedent which may be established here could legally foreclose that element in the future. I point to the fact that I own seven ( 7 ) lots, as set forth on the official and filed maps 745 and 156 of Nassau Point. The official maps are being contorted by the Hohn application and sketch plan. Southold Planning Board November 17, 1990 -3- Approval of this site plan would be contrary to the regulations of the Zoning Code, which provides for maximum protection of residential areas, the adequacy of traffic access, the preservation of natural and scenic quality of open lands, the comfort and convenience of the immediate neighborhood in particular, and the provision that the site plan must be in character with that generally prevailing in the area. We point out that the approval of this site plan would be the first cluster of housing in the immediate neighborhood and would seriously affect the value of all premises in the general and immediate areas. Vey my you Ge rge . Burrell P. S. Please use my Florida address or telephone number for a response if necessary. In the event an immediate contact cannot be made please use the following New York City number for contact: ( 212 ) 808-7694 Hessages will be relayed by my secretary with whom I am in touch when not available at my Florida residence. �e s 270 Jerusalem Road Cohasset , MA 02025 November 16 , 1990 Planning Board of the Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road C; P.O. Box 1179 Southold , New York 11971 REFERENCE : Minor Subdivision Application of Harry C. and Janet Hohn, situated at Nassau Point Dear Members of the Board : I have read the Planning Board 's file on the Hohn 's application up through Attorney Esseks' letter of October 18 , 1990 . I urge the Board to approve the Hohn 's application in whatever form the Board deems appropriate . As a member of the Cohasset , Massachusetts ' Planning Board , I am fully aware that the opinion of an abutter of an abutter is of no consequence in the deliberations of your Board . However , I would like the record to show that not all of Nassau Point - neighbors and "Association" - is lined up in opposition to the Hohn 's application and their right to the reasonable and peaceful enjoyment and use of their property. I obviously also support the correction of the oversight that occurred with the subdivision of the Alexander/Hurley property. My house is the next to last house on the right hand side of Nassau Point Road before Aborn Lane . It has been in the family since the 1920 ' s, when my grandfather purchased the property and built the house . I have spent all or part of the year there since 1930. Our family has never belonged to the "Nassau Point Property Owner 's Association" . As an engineer , I enjoyed reading the reports on the source of fresh water on Nassau Point as this issue is a concern to all residents there . I do not agree with the recommended moratorium on building . Non-household use of water should be curtailed and lawn sprinklers should be banned entirely. Virtually all household water returns to the water table . I find it ironic that the neighbor writing in defense of the water supply has an automatic sprinkler system that waters his lawn every summer morning . There is no mystery as to why the "Aborn" property was not subdivided in the "Nassau Point Club Properties" subdivision - the Aborn 's had already purchased it . After WWII , the developer of Nassau Point sold deeds to roads, rights of way, lands below the high water mark (owned by the State ) , etc . These deeds were recorded although most, if not all , are worthless . Specifically, I claim the right to use Aborn Lane and the right of way that continues from the end of Aborn Lane alongside the Hohn property to Peconic Bay. I have used both since 1940 . I have walked Aborn Lane many times with my children and now grandchildren and believe it to be quite safe with adequate sight lines . The increase in traffic from an additional lot or two is not significant. If there are any questions the Board wishes to ask me , please call me at ( 617) 740-4190 days or ( 617 ) 383-0689 evenings . I would appreciate a copy of the Board 's decision . Respectfully Submitted , Robert HySturdy RHS:pmc New York Life Insurance Comp♦y f 51 Madison Avenue,New York, NY%J010 212 576-5077 <'I p,rt`r Harry G.Hohn Chairman of the Board P6 ® September 25, 1990 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Melissa Spiro, Planner Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision on Dear Ms. Spiro: Nassau Point I will continue to use my good friend and personal lawyer, Bill Esseks, to handle all of the legal aspects of the above matter. I must, however, correct several misstatements of fact as set forth in George A. Burrell's submission of August 25, 1990 to the Board. I am not a speculator in any sense. My family has been a resident and homeowner on the North Fork for over ten years and I currently own a residence on Peconic Bay Blvd. , Mattituck. While we are requesting a four part subdivision, we do not have any current plans to get into the "real estate market" . Currently there are two houses on the property and my family, including my four daughters, enjoy using both houses. The four lot subdivision is proposed with the wonderful expectation `-hcLL they will join Janet and me in -uhe use of all four lots for decades in the future. This is part of a grand plot to get closer to our wonderful grandchildren. About that "open house" item. Nancy, my daughter, was married on September 8, 1990. Her husband's family lives in Maine and we had not had the opportunity to meet them. So we planned a three day visit with them on Nassau Point prior to the wedding. Ta - pp ' NASSAU POINT PROPERTY Q�i;R` S ASSOCIATION P. ❑. Box 346 CUTCHOGUE, L. I., N. Y. 11935 September 14 , 1990 Hon. Scott L. Harris Supervisor, Southold Town Town Hall Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Harris: I am writing to you on behalf of the membership of the Nassau Point Property Owners Association. Our membership is extremely concerned about the quality and supply of ground water for Nassau Point. We are concerned that, in the ,past, our local officials have not acted decisively to protect our interestsin this area. In 1971-1972 the Suffolk County Health Department produced the attached report entitled "Investigation of Ground Water Quality of the Nassau Point Peninsula". This report recommended that the town "establish low density zoning in this area". I hesitate to speculate as to why this recommendation has not been followed but I will tell you that we now have a very serious water problem on our hands. As the bottled water trucks and well drilling rigs parade on to Nassau Point our membership is becoming more enraged by the apparent apathy of our town government towards this issue Clearly,we now have a situation where many of the wells along the outer edge of the peninsula are pumping brackish water. Over the past years many wells have been relocated, further inland, at considerable expense to our members. In effect the 1971-1972 Health Department report has proven to be most accurate. Over the years our association has taken a most active role in opposition to the subdivision of property on Nassau Point. Regrettably, our track record has not been very good in that most submissions have ultimately been approved by the Planning Board. At the present time we are opposing Hohn SCTM 1000-118-6-1 and 3.1. Frankly, our fear is that there are many more potential subdivisions waiting in the wings and that eventually every existing home will be pumping brackish water. I remind you that all of this is happening in an area where the Suffolk County Health Department has recommended low density zoning. As a partial solution, we request that our new town administration act to change the Zoning Ordinances which pertain to Nassau Point in the following manner: Any subdivision of property, (parcel of land) , must create building lots of two (2 ) or more acres. Any existing property, (parcel of land) , which is presently a legal building lot but is less than two (2) acres may have only one dwelling placed on the lot. We believe that this change will have a very positive long term impact on our water supply and our property values. By our estimates, this change will preclude the possibility of more than twenty five additional wells on Nassau Point and thereby protect the existing supply of potable water. For your information, we are in the process of gathering the attached petition from our membership. Within the next sixty days I will forward these completed documents to your attention. We ask that you act now to support this proposed zoning change and the recommendations of the Suffolk County Health Department. We ask that you seize this opportunity to correct a situation which has somehow been allowed to slip between the cracks. Sincerely, /oh J. Slatt y President attachments /1 Cc:i.s vT•,• 5 �� I INVESTIGATION OF GROUND WATER QUALITY OF THE NASSAU POINT PENINSULA ------------ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY C SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH fierbert W. Davids , Director Division of Environmental Health Services C Location: Nassau Point , also known as Little Hog Neck , is. a peninsula located on the south shore of the North Fork in the Town of Southold , Suffolk County (Fig. I )- The peninsula has an approximate land arta of 0. 75 sq . mi . and is surrounded by salt water bodies . Great Peconic Bay borders the peninsula on the west and the Little Peconic Bay on the east. Haywaters and Broadwaters separate the peninsula from the mainland on the north . A causeway, approximately 1500 feet in length by 150 feet in width, connects the peninsula to the mainland . CGeology : Underlying soil conditions of Nassau Point consist of primarily glacial outwash deposits . These deposits are chiefly sands and gravels of Upper Pliestocene age . An area , near Wunneweta Pond , consists of ground moraine deposits which are a mixture of clay , sand and pebbles to boulder sized gravel . Shoreline deposits of -recent geologic age comprise the east toast of the Point. This formation is well sorted sand and gravel deposited by currect and wave action . The topography elevations range from sea level to over 50 feet . Climate : The predominate climate for the area is temperate marine. Temperatures are moderate and precipitation is abundant during the fall , winter and spring . Summer usually is dry . The mean annual precipitation is 44 . 5 inches . The April -September mean precipitation is 20 . 5 inches . CGround Water : A small body of fresh water underlies Nassau Point ( Fig . 2) . Precipitation provides the only source of replenishment of the ground water reservior. A part of the precipitation flows overland to the surrounding salt water bodies and fresh water ponds . A part is returned to the atmosphere by evaporation and by trans- piration of plants. The remainder of the precipitation seeps into the ground . Some of the seepage into the ground eventually reaches the ground water reservior and becomes available for withdrawal by wells ( Fig. 3 ) . At the present time , all the homes on the peninsula use private wells . Information supplied by individual homeowners indicate that well depths vary 10 to 100 feet . It is estimated that approximately 5 inches of the annual precipitation enters the surface waters as direct runoff and 11 inches is lost throug the combined effects of evaporation and transpiration (evapotranspir- ation) . Recharge to the ground water reservior is the difference between the amount of precipitation and the sum of direct runoff and evapotrans - piration. The annual recharge for the Nassau Point area is 160 million gallons . A 10% reduction is included to allow for local clay soil conditions , Paving , and residential homes . All the fresh ground water available for use on the peninsula is contained under water table conditions in upper Pliestocene deposits . Since the Point is virtually surrounded by salt water , the area is -3- treated as an island of ground water or a discrete fresh water lens . The specific gravity of the fresh water is less than that of the underlying salt water , therefore , the fresh water tends to float on the salt water within the boundaries of the island generally according to the Ghyben-Herzberg principle (Fig . 4 ) . This principle states that equilibriun , the depth of fresh water below sea level at any point on the island , is proportional to the fresh water head above sea level and dependent on the relation of the specific gravities of fresh and salt water . Generally , the relationship shows that fresh water would extend 40 feet below sea level for each foot it extends above sea level . This theory does not take into account Cthe zone of mixed water around the fresh water lens . Little Hog Neck , based on 1963 report, contains a fresh water mound with a crest altitude of slightly more than 1 foot. A report by the Geological Survey of water table elevations as of March 1970 was not of sufficient detail to include Nassau Point since the contour map developed had elevations shown at 5 ' intervals . The movement of the ground water moves toward the surrounding salt water bodies along flow lines whose direction is normal or perpendicular to the water table contour . It is estimated by the USGS that there is 600 million cubic feet of deposits satuated with fresh water . This water is not totally available The specific yield of the aquifer is assumed to be about 22% based on studies performed in the Town . This would leave the peninsula with an estimated volume of fresh water in storage as 1 ,000 million gallons . f -5- detergents , chlorides , iron and pH. Additional samples were taken on March 2 , 1971 . One home was sampled on both occasions to determine seasonal variations . No variation was found . Nitrates find there way into water supplies from the decomposition of organic nitrogen and ammonia , both of which are present in household sewage . Lawn and garden fertilizers are also a source of nitrates . Maximum permissible levels of 10 mg/l nitrate nitrogen has been set due to serious and occasionally fatal poisioning of infants ingesting waters containing nitrates . Detergents have their orgin specifically from the household waste disposal system and therefore a good indicator that sewage wastes are Centering an individual water supply . The recommended limit for deter- gents is 0 . 5 mg or MBAS . Chlorides are a dual indicator. High concentrations can be used to indicate salt water intrusion while lower values show either domestic sewage pollution and/or salt water intrusion. The Drinking Water Standard, for chlorides is 250 mg/1 . Iron concentrations in excess of the recommended Drinking Water Standards is an esthetic problem causing discoloration , taste , and clothes and fixture staining . pH is 14 point range indicating the acidity or alkalinity of the water with a value of 7 being neutral . 0-7 indicates a acidic condition . -7- fluctuation and the samll percentage of land receiving fertilizers . The iron concentrations in excess of standards were probably caused by well inactivity , plumbing or the well casings . Conclusions 1 . Nassau Point has a limited quantity of fresh water in under- ground storage due to the salt water of the Bay ' s existing below the peninsula . 2 . The only source of replenishment of the fresh ground water is by natural precipitation of which only about one half finds it way into the water table by the inflitration process . 3 . Chemical analyses (chlorides) indicated that salt water C intrusion is evident in 50% of the wells surveyed while an additional 301% had chloride levels in which differentiation between salt intrusion and cesspool pollution could not be actually determined . Eighty percent of the homes are thus experiencing chloride levels in their water supply greater than normal accepted ground water concentrations although none exceeded drinking water standards . 4 . The rate of salt water intrusion cannot be accurately es- tablished but the rate will be a function of development, population growth , ground water withdrawal and the amount of natural precipitation . Another drought with the resultant lowering of the ground water table will further aggrevate the fresh salt water balance and increase the rate of ground water ( deterioration. PETITION TO REZONE NASSAU POINT In 1981 the Suffolk County Department of Health conducted an investigation of ground water quality for the peninsula of Nassau Point. This report outlined specific recommendations for the future and indicated that we would have sufficient water to support up to 350 homes. The report also reminds us that Nassau Point is a peninsula surrounded by salt water and that 100% of our ground water comes from the precipitation which falls on the Paint. Our ground water reservoir is totally isolated from the mainland and when overdrawn causes salt water to displace fresh water at those sites closest to the beach. This is why many property owners have had to relocate their wells further from the shore as additional homes have been built on the Point. We have reached the 350 home target outlined in the 1981 report and yet there are a number of potentially large lot subdivisions which could negatively impact our water supply. Several of these subdivisions are pending as I write this petition. One of the primary recommendations of the 1981 report was the establishment of low density Zoning for Nassau Point. When the Southold Planning Board recently developed their new master plan with two(2) acre Zoning they inadvertently left Nassau Point Zoned at one(1) acre. Your Board of Directors would like to petition the Town of Southold to change the Zoning Ordinances which pertain to Nassau Point in the following manners Any subdivision of property, (parcel of land) , must create new building lots of two(2) or more acres. Any existing property, (parcel of land) , which is presently a legal building lvt but is less than two(Z) acres may have only one dwelling placed on the lot. We ask that you support this petition to protect our water supply by returning the attached postcard to us by return mail. Thank you for your immediate response and support. Charles E. Fraser Chairman, Property and Planning PETITION TO REZONE NASSAU POINT I request that the Nassau Point Property Owners Association petition the Town of Southold to change the Zoning Ordinances which govern the peninsula of Nassau Point as follows: Any subdivision of property, (parcel of land) , must create new building lots of two (2) or more acres. Any existing property, (parcel of land) , which is presently a legal building lot but less than two(2) acres may have only one dwelling placed on the lot. Name of Owner Signature of Owner (Please print your name) Cutchogue, New York, 11935 Date (Nassau Point address) Nassau Point Property Owners Assn. P.O. Box 346 ` Cutchoque, L. I. New York 11935 • 9UNTY OF SUFFOLK StlBF►LE SrR�G Copy PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER September 7, 1990 Arnold M. Behrer,Jr.,M.D., Chairman Conservation Committee SEP 4 X90 P.O. Box 523 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Dr. Behrer: Thank you for your letter of August 29, 1990 regarding residential development on Nassau Point, Town of Southold. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has always been con- cemed with the health impacts of development on the peninsula's groundwater supply, and over the years a number of related reports and recommendations have been prepared. The first Department report was prepared in 1971-2 and was entitled Investigation of Ground Water Quality of the Nassau Point Peninsula," a copy of which you enclosed with your letter. This report was followed by a more detailed and exhaustive study in 1982, entitled "Development of Nassau Point: Impacts on Groundwater Quantity (copy attached). The 1982 study concluded that the potential impacts of development alone on the overall quantity of fresh groundwater lenses below Nassau Point are small compared to those of drought, and that the difference between the impacts of 485 and 585 (or 350)dwelling units is insignificant. The 1982 study differed from the original report in that it is based on consumptive use rates (20 gallons per capita per day) rather than total pumpage rates (100 gallons per capita per day), since most pumped groundwater is returned to the aquifer through cesspools. Groundwater and water supply management recommendations for Nassau Point and other similar areas were presented by the Department in the 1987 report entitled "Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. Chapter 10 of that report (copy enclosed) recommends the establishment of water quality treatment districts to handle isolated water quality problems in private wells; a moratorium on development was not recommended. BUREAU OF DRINKING WATER 228 RABRO DRIVE EAST HAUPPAUGE. NEW YORK 11788 (816)348-2776 M Dr. Arnold M. Behrer,Jr. September 7, 1990 page 2 I hope you will find the enclosed materials helpful. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or my staff. Very truly yours, ,:::� 4--A 4-- David Hams,M.D., M.P.H. Commissioner DH/sfr Enclosures (2) cc: Town of Southold Trustees,John M. Bredemeyer,III Town of Southold Building Department,Victor Lessard Town of Sou*mld Planning Beard,Bennett Orlowski,J?. John Slattery, President,Nassau Point Property Owners' Association DEVELOPMENT OF NASSAU POINT: IMPACTS ON GROUNDWATER QUANTITY SEP TM Y� SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, M.D. , M.P.H. COMMISSIONER H. W. DAVIDS, P.E. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PREPARED BY: BUREAU OF WATER RESOURCES JOSEPH H. BAIER, P.E. , CHIEF SY F. ROBBINS, HYDROGEOLOGIST DECEMBER 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Il. Introduction. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .2 III. Existing Freshwater Resources. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 IV. Impacts of Drought. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 V. Impacts of Full Development. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 VI. Impacts of Drought and Full Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 Bibliography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 Appendix A: Calculations for Region I. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .A-1 Appendix B: Calculations for Region II. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B-1 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Location Map: Nassau Point. . .. . .. . . . .. .. ...... . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . .3 2. Regions Used for Groundwater Calculations. .. . . ... . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. .5 3. Freshwater Lenses in Cross Section: Nassau Point.. .. . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . .9 LIST OF TABLES 1. Summary of Results: Analysis of Nassau Point. . . .. . .. . .. . ... . . . .. . . . . .6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS gpd - gallons per day gpd/cap - gallons per day per capita mgd - million gallons per day mil gal - million gallons m.s.l. - mean sea level USGS - United States Geological Survey ii I. SUMMARY The residents of Long Island' s Nassau Point rely soley on the small water. The existing number of single family houses (312) is expected to increase to between 485 and 585 units at full development, thus raising con- cerns about the potential depletion of the resource, particularly if the maximum number of units are constructed and drought conditions are exper- ienced. Such depletion of the resource could cause private wells to become contaminated by salt as the freshwater/saltwater interface that delimits the freshwater lenses.moves upward. This study utilized an analytical model of Nassau Point's groundwater system to determine the potential impacts of development and drought on the size and shape of the freshwater lenses below the peninsula. Based on con- servative, "worst case" estimates, the study found that: 1) The volume of fresh water normally available below the peninsula as a whole is 609 million gallons; under drought conditions, this volume could be reduced by about 30% to 431 million gallons. 2) The rate of recharge to the lenses under normal rainfall conditions is 0.6 mgd; in comparison, the upper limit of consumptive use at full de- velopment (485-585 dwelling units) is only 0.029-0.035 mgd (or 4.8%- 5.8% of recharge) , which would reduce the volume of available water in storage within the lenses by only 2.5%-3.0% (15-18 million gallons) . 3) The maximum upward movement of the interface due to consumptive use at full development would be only 1.3 feet and would occur at the center of the peninsula, where the lens is normally over 41 feet thick; there would be no appreciable changes near the shoreline, where the lens is thinnest and private wells are most vulnerable. 4) The effects of drought on lens thickness would overshadow those caused by development; maximum reductions could reach 14 feet near the center of the peninsula, of which only about 2 feet would be due to consump- tive use. Thus, the potential impacts of development alone on the overall quanti- ty of fresh water available below Nassau Point are small compared to those of drought, and the difference between 485 and 585 units is insignificant. These findings, however, do not imply that adequate water will be available on every building lot, or that future development will not affect water quantity below isolated spits of land; the problem of groundwater quality is also not addressed. Further study and planning are required. II. INTRODUCTION Nassau Point (also known as Little Hog Neck) is a small peninsula that extends soutt:wara ircm Long island' s ilotLk: ur.: into Lr ule =eco aic Key aL Cutchogue, Town of Southold (Figure 1) . The subsurface materials consist of highly permeable sands and gravels of glacial origin (primarily outwash, with some till) . Fresh water below the peninsula is stored within a lens that floats above denser, salty groundwater that has infiltrated the aqui- fer from surrounding tidal waters. The freshwater lens is recharged from above by precipitation; about an equal amount of fresh water is discharged from the lens at the shoreline, thus maintaining an overall balance (dynam- ic equilibrium) . The lens of fresh water is the sole source of drinking water for the residents of the peninsula, where all 312 single family houses utilize pri- vate wells.I There are 173 vacant single family residential tax parcels on the peninsula, bringing the total number of residential tax parcels (both developed and undeveloped) to 485. About 15 of these tax parcels could be further subdivided into smaller plots that would conform to the 1 acre (40,000 square foot) area requirement of the Town zoning code, thus yielding another 37 building lots.2 In addition, about 48 other tax parcels con- tain two or more entire subdivision lots from the original "old file" maps for the area; if developed, an additional 63 units could be built.3 Thus, the maximum number of single family houses at full development would be 585, or about 21% more than the 485 units based on existing residential tax par- cels alone. 1 . Most of the existing houses are taxed as year-round residences; less than 10% are taxed as seasonal residences, although a much larger per- centage is probably used seasonally. 2. Many of the undeveloped parcels are "undersized" according to the Town zoning code and the Suffolk County health code (see footnote 3); both codes, however, provide for variances for undersized tax parcels that are in single-and-separate ownership. 3. The 48 tax parcels (some of which already have houses on them) contain 111 subdivision lots, only 25 of which meet the Town zoning code area requirement (40,000 square feet) and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services' area requirement for private wells (also 40,000 square feet) . The "old-file" subdivision maps, however, were exempted from Town zoning requirements; thus, all 111 lots would probably receive Town building permits. -2- CONNECTICUT NORTHH , :Cs ices �S� FORK-� ysy •� tSLpNO a LUNG a _ NEW ryi-� ~n r— JERSEY \ SUFFOLK T r ti tt[Uratt NASSAU UCCAN J° ATLANTIC v . 1 JX q r 4% 1Ai .. _._ ,s J ,r.a� ester tom!' �s uthoIf � manes-aw s.nr s a i � C< i 1 i wF. •� yi— — —•-� � RAWNASSAU POINT � -� .�'r•�e�\\ A a •-�. �r �. Nava Ilia�l tMd L i_p l e PecQhic Bay i - .wl.l tesla 7jat Great " +� _.Peconic Bay a6 tv h SMI SWAN -e V VIr � /:i�/� � � lT I } r'�_ ��outh ' �. - �A Iwiln un news S s� 1 y sw.wa and a / 1 W� AIt/IS/IM lecock Q Bay FIG. 1 LOCATION MAP: NASSAU POINT —3— The purpose of this report is to assess the impacts of residential de- velopment on the quantity of Nassau Point's overall groundwater resource. Potential changes in the size and shape of the major freshwater lenses below r titR i��.:1 taS LL13 .h uJ ..: Uf C.1 t- Uel.ill:e CV- houses are calculated, and the overall availability of fresh ground water on the peninsula is assessed. This report does not, however, attempt to deter- mine the availability of fresh water under individual building lots, or the impacts of development on groundwater quality, which may be significant. The only quality impacts discussed in this report are potential increases in chloride concentrations that may result from the upward movement of the freshwater/saltwater interface that delimits the freshwater lenses. III. EXISTING FRESHWATER RESOURCES The shape of the freshwater lenses below Nassau Point are influenced by the numerous tidal coves, ponds, and lagoons that border and cut into the peninsula. The freshwater resource, therefore, is made up of numerous, ir- regularly shaped lenses. In order to simplify the analyses made in this report, the two major lenses below the peninsula were represented (approxi- mated) by the two regions shown in Figure 2 -- one elliptically shaped (Re- gion I) , and one rectangularly shaped (Region II). The combined area of the two regions is 0.58 square miles (see Table 1), which is about 23% less than the total land area of the peninsula (0.75 square miles). Therefore, totals for these two regions of such parameters as the rate of precipitation re- charge to the aquifer, and the volume of available fresh water in storage within the aquifer, represent minimum (conservative) estimates for the pen- insula as a whole. The use of these conservative figures, however, allowed "worst case" impacts of development to be calculated. _ The volumes of water recharged by precipitation to the lenses under Regions I and II are shown in Table 1. The conservative estimate of total recharge under normal (average) rainfall conditions (44 inches/year or 0.01 feet/day) is 0.6 million gallons per day (mgd); this estimate is based on the assumption that 50% of the rainfall is lost to evapotranspiration, and 50% percolates to the aquifer.4 The volumes of water available for pumping from Regions I and II under natural conditions (normal rainfall, no consumptive use) are 475 and 134 million gallons, respectively; thus, a conservative estimate of the total available resource under the entire peninsula is 609 mil gal (Table 1) . 4. Calculations for Regions I and II are presented in Appendice A and B. -4- N y` �e oo C✓Icnavoe //or Gar Harsesnae ✓ /( Core \Y`• L _ 2900' O` I 4600' LPE dlL 'V 4900' II FIG. 2 REGIONS USED FOR GROUNDWATER CALCULATIONS —5— TARi.R 1 SUMMARY OF RESULTS: ANALYSIS OF NASSAU POINT Parameter Region I Region II Total 1. Area (sq miles) 0.376 0.202 0.578 2. Recharge Rate (mgd)") a. natural conditions(b) 0.392 (100%) 0.211 (100%) 0.603 (100%) b. drought conditions(`) 0.196 (50.0%) 0.105 (50.0X) 0.301 (50.0%) c. natural - develop d) - (1) . minimum (485)(`) 0.371 (94.6%) 0.203 (96.4%) 0.574 (95.2%) (2). maximum (585)(f) 0.367 (93.5%) 0.201 (95.47) 0.568 (94.2%) d. drought & develop ca) (1) . minimum (485)(`) 0.175 (44.5%) 0.098 (46.4%) 0.273 (45.3%) (2). maximum (585)") 0.171 (43.5%) 0.095 (45.2%) 0.266 (44.1%) 3. Avail. Water (mil gal)(h) a. natural conditions(f) 475 (100%) 134 (100%) 609 (100%) b. drought conditions") 336 (70.7%) 94.7 (70.7%) 431 (70.7%) c. full development'`) (1) . minimum (485)(`) 462 (97.3%) 132 (98.2%) 594 (97.5%) (2). maximum (585)(f) 460 (96.8%) 131 (97.7%) 591 (97.0%) d. drought S develop.1) (1) . minimum (485)(`) 317 (66.7%) 91.4 (68.2%) 408 (67.7%) (2). maximum (585)(') 313 (66.0%) 90.0 (67.2%) 403_ (66.2%) 4. Max. Lens Thick. (ft)(') a. natural conditions(f) 41.4 (100%) 18.4 (100%) --- b. drought conditionsV� 29.3 (70.7%) 13.0 (70.7%) --- c. full development (1). minimum (485)(`) 40.3 (97.3%) 18.1 (98.2%) --- (2). maximum (585)(f) 40.1 (96.8X) 18.0 (97.7%) --- d. drought & develop.u) (1) . minimum (485)(`) 27.6 (66.7%) 12.5 (68.2%) --- (2) . maximum (585)") 27.3 (66.0%) 12.4 (67.2%) --- -6- TABLE 1 continued Parameter Region I Region II Total 5. Consumptive Use Rate(") a. minimum (485 units) (1) . vol. rate (gpd) 2.14 x 104 7.68 x 103 2.91 x 104 (2) . % nat. recharge 5.5t 3.6% 4.8% b. maximum (585 units) (1) . vol. rate (gpd) 2.54 x 104 9.66 x 103 3.51 x 104 (2). % nat. recharge 6.5% 4.6% 5.8% (a) . Volume of water recharged to lens under each region (W x Area) . (b). Natural conditions -- periods of normal rainfall (44 inch/year). (c) . Drought conditions -- periods of reduced rainfall (22 inch/year) . (d). Natural recharge minus consumptive use (2.a - 5.a or 5.b). (e) . Based on tax parcels (Region I 357, Region II 128, Total 485) . (f). Tax parcels + subdivision lots (Region 1424, Region II 161, Total 585). (g). Drought recharge minus consumptive use (2.b - 5.a or 5.b). (h) . Vol. of water available for pumping (lens vol. x specific yield (0.22)). (i) . Periods of normal (average) rainfall and no consumptive use. (j). Periods of reduced rainfall and no consumptive use. (k). Full development -- natural rainfall conditions and consumptive use. (1). Drought & develop. -- drought rainfall conditions and consumptive use. (m). Region I at the center axis; Region II at the groundwater divide. (n). Upper limit est. based on 60 gpd/household; may be over 4 times too high. -7- The calculated shapes of the freshwater lenses below Regions land II under natural conditions are shown in cross section in Figure 3. The maxi- mum thickness of each lens occurs at its center (furthest inland); Region I ills X:iYIllullt UalcS :dJU 'JT_ -11 -4 LC_L hL LL5 .,LLLLICC ..n_ , w:il'_t' .1_b10L: LL :las a maximum thickness of 18.4 feet at the groundwater divide (Table 1) ., IV. IMPACTS OF DROUGHT The impacts of drought were determined by reducing the recharge rate by 50% (to 11 inches/year or 0.0025 feet/day). The result was to reduce the volume of available water in storage below the peninsula and the depth of the interface by about 30% (Table 1) .5 Under drought conditions, the to- tal volume of available water would be reduced by 178 mil gal, to 431 mil gal (Table 1) . Maximum reductions in aquifer thickness would occur-at the center axis of Region I (12.1 feet) and along the groundwater divide in Re- gion II (5.4 feet) . These changes are shown graphically in Figure 3. Such changes in the position of the freshwater/saltwater interface could cause a significant increase in chloride concentrations in private wells now screen- ed in the lower portions of the aquifer, especially those wells located fur- thest inland. V. IMPACTS OF FULL DEVELOPMENT The impacts of the consumptive use of water at full development on the sizes and shapes of the freshwater lenses were determined by reducing the re- charge rate to the aquifer (under natural conditions) by the rate at which water would, be lost to the system (consumed).6 The "upper limit esti- mates of consumptive use at minimum full development (485 units) and maximum full developoment (585 units) are 29,100 gpd and 35,100 gpd, respectively (Table 1). These upper limit values are based on a 60 gpd/household con- sumptive use rate, which may be more than four times the actual rate for the Nassau Point peninsula.7 Nevertheless, the use of these upper limit val- ues, along with the conservative a§timates of the size and shape of the freshwater resource, allowed "worst case" impacts to be assessed. 5. Lens volume and thickness are proportional to the square root of the recharge rate; (0.50)#=0.707, see Appendices A and B. 6. The rate of consumptive use is equal to the difference between the rate of groundwater withdrawal (pumping) and the rate at which used water is returned to the aquifer via cesspools or lawns (irrrigation). 7. This assumes a 100 gpd/cap water use rate, a 20% consumptive use per- centage, and an average, year-round household size of 3.0 people per household (see Appendix A, Section A.VI). -8- REGION I WATER TABLE NORMAL DROUGHT�\ — L 0" - 0 5 mal 5.0' CENTRAL AXIS 10.0' 15.0' 20.0' 25.0' INTERFACE 30.0' NORMAL 35.0' DEVELOPMENT _ DROUGHT 40.0' DROUGHT 8 DEVELOPMENT I I F I O 500' 1000' 1500' 2000' (6) REGION 1I WATER TABLE NORMAL DROUGHT 0.5' mal GROUNDWATER 2.5' DIVIDE. - s 0' 7.5' INTERFACE 10.0' NORMAL 12.5' DEVELOPMENT DROUGHT 15.0' DROUGHT 8 DEVELOPMENT 17.5' 20.0' i 1 1 I I O 250' Soo' 750' i000' (6) FIG. 3 FRESHWATER LENSES IN CROSS SECTION: NASSAU POINT lS —9— The upper limit consumptive use rates represent 4.8%-5.8% of the total natural recharge rate to the aquifer (Table 1) . Since the volume of avail- able nater in stora,,e is vroportional to the square root of the recharge rate, reducing the recharge rate by the consumptive use rates would reduce the total volume of available water by 15-18 million gallons (2.5%-3.0%). Aquifer thickness, which is also proportional to the square root of the re- charge rate, would be similarly affected. The maximum thickness of Region 1, which occurs at its center axis, would be reduced by 1.1-1.3 feet (2.7%- 3.2%); the maximum thickness of Region II, which occurs along the ground- water divide, would be reduced by 0.3-0.4 feet (1.8%-2.3%). The changes in interface position due to development are shown in cross section in Figure 3. Since aquifer thickness would be reduced by a percent- age, the largest changes would occur furthest inland; reductions would de- crease toward the shoreline, and would be smallest where the lens is thin- nest and private wells are most vulnerable. It is unlikely, therefore, that private wells would be impacted by the effects on groundwater quantity of development alone. VI. IMPACTS OF DROUGHT AND FULL DEVELOPMENT The impacts of the consumptive use of water at full development under drought conditions were determined by reducing the drought recharge rate by the consumptive use rate. The total volume of available water in storage would be reduced by 201-206 mil gal (32.3%-33.8%) when compared to natural conditions, and by 23-28 mil gal (5.3%-6.5%) when compared to drought condi- tions alone (Table 1) . Maximum aquifer thicknesses would be reduced by 1.7- 2.0 feet (5.8%-6.8%) in Region I, and by 0.5-0.6 feet (3.8%-4.6%) in Region II, when compared to drought conditions alone (Table I and Figure 3) . In terms of natural aquifer thickness, the largest decrease (14.1 feet) would occur at the center of Region I, of which 12.1 feet would be due to drought, and 2.0 feet would be due to development (585 units). Clearly, the impacts of drought on groundwater quantity would overshadow those of development, even if the maximum number of houses is built. -LO- BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Crandell, H.C. 1963. Geology and Ground-Water Resources of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. USGS Water-Supply Paper 1619=GG. 2. Fetter, C.W. Jr. 1972. Position of the Saline Water Interface beneath Oceanic Islands. Water Resources Research 8(5) :1307. Oct. 1972. 3. McClymonds, N.E. and O.L. Franke. 1972. Water-Transmitting Properties of Aquifers on Long Island, New York. USGS Prof. Paper 627-E. -11- APPENDIX A CALCULATIONS FOR REGION I 3.1 J.Ia.A Region I is elliptical (Figure 3) , with dimensions 2900 feet (east- west) and 4600 feet (north-south). The area of an ellipse is equal to 'iab, where a and b are the semi-axes.1 The area of Region I is therefore: Trab = ir(1450)(2300) = 1.05 x 107ft2 = 0.376 sq miles This area is equivalent to the area of a circle with a radius of about 1830 feet.2 A.II VOLUMETRIC RECHARGE RATES: NATURAL AND DROUGHT CONDITIONS The volume of water recharged daily by precipitation to the aquifer below Region I is equal to the area multiplied by the recharge rate per unit area. For Nassau Point, the estimated natural recharge rate per unit area is 50% of the 44 inch/year precipitation rate -- 22 inches/year (0.005 ft/day) . The volumetric recharge rate is thus: (1.05 x 107ft2)(0.005 ft/day) = 5.24 x 104ft3/day = 0.392 mgd Under drought conditions, when the recharge rate per unit area is assumed to be reduced by 50% to 0.0025 ft/day, the volumetric recharge rate would also be halved to 0.196 mgd. A.III VOLUME OF AVAILABLE WATER: NATURAL CONDITIONS The volume of the freshwater lens below a cicular oceanic island is given by: Volume of lens= 9.483 (W/K)IR3 where W = recharge rate per unit area (ft/day); K = hydraulic conductivity of aquifer (ft/day); and, R = radius of island (feet). 1. The area of a circle, which is a special form of an ellipse in which a = b = r, where r is the radius, is n r2. 2. See Section A.M. A-1 The volume of the lens contains both solid aquifer material and water. The amount of water available for withdrawal is equal to the specific yield t'-me, the volamc of the lent , thus: Volume of available water = S 9.483 (W/K)iR3 - For Nassau Point, Region I, the following input values were used: W = recharge rate = 22 inches/year = 0.005 ft/day K = hydraulic conductivity3 = 200 ft/day R = island radius = 1830 feet S = specific yield = 0.22 (Crandell, 1963) The volume of fresh water available from the lens under natural conditions is therefore: (0.22) 9.483 (0.005/200)f(1830)3 = 6.35 x 107ft3 = 475 mil gal A.IV THICKNESS OF THE AQUIFER: NATURAL CONDITIONS The height above mean sea level (m.s.l.) of the water table on a circu- lar oceanic island is given by: h(r) = f W (R2- r2)1'� 1LL 82 K J where W, K, and R are defined as in Section A.III, and h(r) = height of water table above m.s.l. at position r (feet); and, r = distance from center axis of island to position r (feet). According to the Ghyben/Herzberg theory, the depth of the freshwater/salt- water interface below m.s.l. at location r is 40h(r) , and the total thick- ness of the freshwater lens is 41h(r) - Using the above formula, and the input values listed in Section A.III, the following results were calculated: 3. Upper glacial aquifer, north central Suffolk (McClymonds and Franke, 1972, Table 6). A-2 dist. from dist. from height of depth of thick. of axis shoreline water table interface aquifer r R-r h 40h 41h 1 .al . _ . 830 1000 0.90 36.0 36.9 1330 500 0.69 27.8 28.5 1580 250 0.51 20.4 20.9 1780 50 0.23 9.4 9.6 1830 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 These values were plotted to give the curve shown in Figure 3(a). The cal- culations show that there is about 10 feet of aquifer thickness 50 feet from the shoreline, and a maximum thickness of 41.4 feet at the center of the island, where the water table elevation is at its maximum (1 foot)} these values are consistent with data from private wells on Nassau Point. A-VIMPACTS OF DROUGHT CONDITIONS The impacts of drought conditions on the size and shape of the lens were assessed by reducing the recharge rate by 50% to 11 inches/year (0.0025 ft/day) . Since both the volume of available water in storage and the thick- ness of the lens are proportional to the square root of the recharge rate, each would be reduced to (50%)z = 70.7% of the natural value, a reduction of about 29%, thus: (0.707) (475 mil gal) = 336 mil gal (0.707) (41.4 feet) = 29.3 feet _ A.VI CONSUMPTIVE USE RATES AT FULL DEVELOPMENT The ultimate number of houses within Region I is estimated to be be- tween 357 and 424. If the average number of people per household is as- sumed to be 3.0, and the consumptive use rate is assumed to be 20 gpd/cap (20% of 100 gpd/cap water usage) , then the per household consumption rate is 60 gpd. The consumptive use rates for Region I at full development are thus: (357) (60) = 2.14 x 104 gpd (424) (60) = 2.54 x 104 gpd A-3 which are 5.5% and 6.5% of the natural recharge rate to Region I, respec- tively. icC3l: ,16tiLed ft!tkuCI1L Uppcc 1L:11LL _S Alan t'cS JL CO LLS L lvt_ O3C. The average household size used in their computation (3.0) is somewhat larg- er than the average for the Cutchogue-New Suffolk area (2.6) , according to the 1980 Census. Many of the houses on the peninsula are seasonal, and would not draw on the resource year-round. The per capita usage rate (100 gpd) is a standard sewer design criteria that assumes mixed land use (com- mercial, industrial, residential) and is probably too large for an area like Nassau Point that has only single-family residential development; the Suf- folk County Water Authority estimates that the average usage rate in such residential areas of Suffolk County is about 60 gpd/cap. In addition, the 20% consumptive use percentage is also a general criteria and is probably too large for an area with small residential lawns, where watering require- ments and resultant evapotranspiration losses are small; a 10% figure is probably more accurate. Using the lower household size and per capita con- sumption rates, the per household consumption rate would be 15.6 gpd, or only 26% of the upper limit value, and would be even smaller if seasonal occupation of some of the houses is taken into account. In subsequent calculations, the upper limit estimates of consumptive use rates at full development are used to evaluate worst case impacts. It should be kept in mind that these values may be over four times as much as the actual ultimate consumptive use rates. A.VII IMPACTS OF CONSUMPTIVE USE AT FULL DEVELOPMENT: NATURAL CONDITIONS Since private wells are fairly evenly distributed over the area of Re- gion I, the effects of consumptive use at full development on the size and shape of the freshwater lens could be determined by reducing the recharge rate (under natural conditions) by the rate of consumptive use. For minimum full development (357 units) this gives: (3.92 x 105gpd) - (2.14 x 104gpd) = 3.71 x 105gpd = 0.371 mgd This rate is equal to 94.6% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 5.4% less than the natural recharge rate. Since both the volume of available water in 4. See Sections A.II and A.VI. Dividing the volumetric recharge rate by the area of Region I gives the recharge rate per unit area (W) . A-4 storage and the maximum thickness of the lens are proportional to the square root of the recharge rate, both would be reduced by 2.7%, thus:5 (0.973) (415 mil gal) = 462 mii gai (0.973) (41.4 feet) = 40.3 feet For maximum full development (424 units) , the reduced recharge rate is: (3.92 x 105gpd) - (2.54 x 104gpd) = 3.67 x 105gpd = 0.367 mgd This rate is equal to 93.6% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 6.4% less than the natural recharge rate. The volume of available water in storage and the maximum lens thickness, therefore, would be reduced by 3.2% to:6 (0.968) (475 mil gal) = 460 mil gal (0.968) (41.4 feet) = 40.1 feet A.VIII COMBINED IMPACTS OF DROUGHT AND FULL DEVELOPMENT The combined effects of drought conditions and consumptive use at full development on the size and shape of the freshwater lens were determined .by reducing the recharge rate (under drought conditions) by the rate of con- sumptive use.7 For minimum full development (357 units) , the reduced re- charge rate is: (1.96 x 105gpd) - (2.14 x 104gpd) = 1.75 x 105gpd = 0.175 mgd This rate is equal to 44.5% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 55.5% less than the natural rate. Since both the volume of available water in storage and the maximum thickness of the freshwater lens are proportional to the square root of the recharge rate, both would be reduced 33.3%, thus:8 (0.667) (475 mil gal) = 317 mil gal (0.667) (41.4 feet) = 27.6 feet 5. (0.946)1 = 0.973 6. (0.936)1 = 0.968 7. See Sections A.II and A.VI. 8. (0.445)1 = 0.667 A-5 For maximum full development (424 units) , the reduced recharge rate is: ( 1 .96 x 105gpd) - (2.54 x 104gpd) = 1.71 x 105gpd = 0. 171 mgd This rate is equal to 43.57 of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 56.5% less than the natural rate. The volume of available water in storage and the maximum lens thickness, therefore, would be reduced by 34.07, thus-.9 (0.660) (475 mil gal) = 313 mil gal (0.660) (41.4 feet) = 27.3 feet 9. (0.435)1 = 0.660 A-6 APPENDIX B CALCULATIONS FOR REGION II Region II is rectangular (Figure 3) , with dimensions 1150 feet (east- west) and 4900 feet (north-south). Its area, therefore, is equal to: (1150)(4900) = 5.64 x 106ft2 = 0.202 sq miles B.II VOLUMETRIC RECHARGE RATES: NATURAL AND DROUGHT CONDITIONS The volume of water recharged daily by precipitation to the aquifer below Region II is equal to the area multiplied by the recharge rate per unit area. For Nassau Point, the estimated natural recharge rate per unit area is 50% of the 44 inch/year precipitation rate -- 22 inches/year (0.005 ft/day) . The volumetric recharge rate is thus: (5.64 x 106ft2)(0.005 ft/day) = 2.82 x 104ft3/day = 0.211 mgd Under drought conditions, when the recharge rate per unit area is assumed to be reduced by 50% to 0.0025 ft/day, the volumetric recharge rate would also be halved to 0.105 mgd. B.III VOLUME OF AVAILABLE WATER: NATURAL CONDITIONS The volume of the freshwater lens below a rectangular oceanic island is given by: Volume of lens = 10.06 (W/K)f L a2 where W = recharge rate per unit area (ft/day); K = hydraulic conductivity of aquifer (ft/day); L = length of island (feet); and, a = distance from groundwater divide to shoreline (feet) . The volume of the lens contains both solid aquifer material and water. The amount of water available for withdrawal is equal to the specific yield (S) of the aquifer times the volume of the lens, thus: Volume of available water = S 10.06 (W/K) f L a2 B-1 For Nassau Point, Region II, the following input values were used: W = recbar�,>e rare = 22 inches/vear = 0.005 ft/day K = hydraulic coaductivityl = 200 ft/day L = island length = 4900 feet a = island half-width = 575 feet S = specific yield = 0.22 (Crandell, 1963) The volume of fresh water available from the lens under natural conditions is therefore: (0.22) 10.06 (0.005/200)1(4900)(575)2 = 1.79 x 107ft3 = 134 mil gal B.IV THICKNESS OF THE AQUIFER: NATURAL CONDITIONS The height above mean sea level (m.s.l.) of the water table on a rec- tangular oceanic island is given by: h(x) = rW (a2- x2)1 L 41 K J where W, K, and a are defined as in Section B.III, and h(x) = height of water table above m.s.l. at position x (feet); and, x = distance from groundwater divide (center line) to x (feet). According to the Ghyben/Herzberg theory, the depth of the freshwater/salt- water interface below m.s.l. at location x is 40h(x), and the total thick- ness of the freshwater lens is 41h(x). Using the above formula, and the input values listed in Section B.III, the following results were calculated: dist. from dist. from height of depth of thick. of divide shoreline water table interface aquifer x a-x h 40h 41h 0 575 0.45 18.0 18.4 275 300 0.39 15.6 16.0 375 200 0.34 13.6 13.9 475 100 0.25 10.0 10.2 525 50 0.18 7.2 7.4 575 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 B-2 These values were plotted to give the curve shown in Figure 3(b) . The cal- culations show that there is about 10 feet of aquifer thickness 100 feet from the shoreline, and a maximum thickness of 18.4 feet at the center Line of the island, where the water table elevation is at its maximum (0.45 feet); these values are consistent with data from private wells on Nassau Point. B.V IMPACTS OF DROUGHT CONDITIONS The impacts 'of drought conditions on the size and shape of the lens were assessed by reducing the recharge rate by 50% to 11 inches/year (0.0025 ft/day) . Since both the volume of available water in storage and the thick- ness of the lens are proportional to the square root of the recharge rate, each would be reduced to (50%)f = 70.7% of the natural value, a reduction of about 29%, thus: (0.707) (134 mil gal) = 94.7 mil gal (0.707) (18.4 feet) = 13.0 feet B.VI CONSUMPTIVE USE RATES AT FULL DEVELOPMENT The ultimate number of houses within Region II is estimated to be be- tween 128 and 161. If the average number of people per household is as- sumed to be 3.0, and the consumptive use rate is assumed to be 20 gpd/cap (i.e. , 20% of 100 gpd water usage) , then the per household consumption rate is 60 gpd. The consumptive use rates for Region II at full development are thus: (128) (60) = 7.68 x 103 gpd (161) (60) = 9.66 x 103 gpd which are 3.6% and 4.6% of the natural recharge rate to Region II, respec- tively. Again, these values are upper limit estimates, and may be over four times the actual ultimate consumptive use rates (see Section A.VI) . 1 . Upper glacial aquifer, north central Suffolk (McClymonds and Franke, 1972, Table 6). B-3 B.VII IMPACTS OF CONSUMPTIVE USE AT FULL DEVELOPMENT: NATURAL CONDITIONS $irpe private wells are fairly Pvenl.v di.stribnted over the area of Re- gion II, the effects of consumptive use at full development on the size and shape of the freshwater lens could be determined by reducing the recharge rate (under natural conditions) by the rate of consumptive use. For minimum full development (128 units) this gives: (2.11 x 105gpd) - (7.68 x 103gpd) = 2.03 x 105gpd = 0.203 mgd This rate is equal to 96.4% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 3.6% less than the natural recharge rate. Since both the volume of available water in storage and the maximum thickness of the lens are proportional to the square root of the recharge rate, both would be reduced by 1.8%, thus:2 (0.982) (134 mil gal) = 132 mil gal (0.982) (18.4 feet) = 18.1 feet For maximum full development (161 units) , the reduced recharge rate is: (2.11 x 105gpd) - (9.66 x 103gpd) = 2.01 x 105gpd = 0.201 mgd This rate is equal to 95.4% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 4.6% less than the natural recharge rate. The volume of available water in storage and the maximum lens thickness, therefore, would be reduced by 2.3% to:3 (0.977) (134 mil gal) = 131 mil gal (0.977) (18.4 feet) = 18.0 feet B.VIII COMBINED IMPACTS OF DROUGHT AND FULL DEVELOPMENT The combined effects of drought conditions and consumptive use at full development on the size and shape of the freshwater lens were determined by reducing the recharge rate (under drought conditions) by the rate of con- sumptive use. For minimum full development (128 units) , the reduced re- charge rate is: (1.05 x 105gpd) - (7.68 x 103gpd) = 9.78 x 104gpd = 0.098 mgd 2. (0.964)1 = 0.982 3. (0.954) = 0.977 4. See Sections B.II and B.VI. B-4 This rate is equal to 46.4% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 53.6% less than the natural rate. Since both the volume of available water in r.1 rant nn_d thr maaim�,m rhi -1cnPs- of the freshwarar lens are nro o or t ion al to the square root of the recharge rate, both would be reduced 31.8%, thus: (0.682) (134 mil gal) = 91.4 mil gal (0.682) (18.4 feet) = 12.5 feet For maximum full development (161 units), the reduced recharge rate is: (1.05 x 105gpd) — (9.66 x 103gpd) = 9.53 x 104gpd = 0.095 mgd This rate is equal to 45.2% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 54.8% less than the natural rate. The volume of available water in storage and the maximum lens thickness, therefore, would be reduced by 32.8%, thus:6 (0.672) (134 mil gal) = 90.0 mil gal (0.672) (18.4 feet) = 12.4 feet 5. (0.464)1 = 0.682 6. (0.452)1 = 0.672 B-5 SUFFOLK COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN N SUFFMI[COYMTY OEPMITYEM OF HEALTH$RHES MICHAEL A• LOGRANDE COUNTY EXECUTIVE SEP 1 4 1990 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, M•D• , M• P•H • COMMISSIONER ALDO ANDREOLI , P•E • DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY - PREPARED BY: DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, SCDHS DVIRKA 8 BARTILUCCI , CONSULTING ENGINEERS MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC• JANUARY 1987 10. 0 SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA RECOMMENDATIONS 10 . 1 Insular Areas and Shelter Island . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-1 10. 1. 1 General Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-9 10. 1 . 2 Area-Specific Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-11 10. 2 North Fork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-17 10. 2 . 1 General Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-21 10. 2. 2 Area-Specific Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-24 10 . 3 South Fork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-29 10. 0 SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA RECOMMENDATIONS This chapter presents groundwater and water supply manage- ment recommendations for the Water Management Areas identified in Figure 10-1. Section 10 . 1 covers recommendations for the insular areas and Shelter Island, which are characterized by freshwater lenses that are isolated from the main groundwater reservoir. Section 10. 2 presents recommendations for the Riverhead/Southold Management Area, while Section 10. 3 covers the South Fork - Main Body Management Area. Background data and projections are included in each section to aid in under- standing the basis for each recommendation. 10. 1 Insular Areas and Shelter Island Thirteen areas are covered in this section: North Shore Lloyd Neck Eatons Neck South Shore Gilgo-Oak Beach Fire Island Westhampton Beach North Fork Nassau Point Great Hog Neck Orient Plum Island South Fork North Haven Montauk Shelter Island Fishers Island Robins Island (which is not included) is projected to be used only for recreation and open space, and does not require sig- nificant water supply development. 10-1 { [ SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER MANAGEMENT AREAS FISHERS ISLAnD LLOYD EATONS - ORIENT /PLUM IS. NASSAU Pt NECK NECK LONG ISLAND SOUND. ROBINS IS, \ , GREAT HOG ,, \ N NECK, $ O ___--- FtHEAD .N i ; •• EHEL 5 NORTH I AVEN HUNTINGTON I I •, ,• I SOUTH D r^,+.. i- H \�' SMITHTOWN I S/Jl' I r I RIV EflN EAD � �i . .MONTauK BROOKHAVEN 7`-•_ �:: II EAST .�.. i HAMPTON , ISASYLON ♦✓ (SLIP SOUTHAMPTON , I •t .••i' I , ,L� .` .. •. 6O D ��K •: 1 •. •' 'O�jTH K-N,A�CI FOR ,, AI LES ! m yES '.O HIVf.�. .. r . / ,�•.. SCALE .O.,O o.� '••rl..✓:i..:r..r•l"". •• " I WESTHA PTON BEAC'� ♦�♦ .. ! J..y 1 ATLANTIC OCEAN IGILOO.OAK BEACH FIRE IS. .-INSULAR AREAS SUFFOLK COUNTY I { WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN I FIGURE 10 - 1 WRMP Table 10-1 INSULAR AREAS : POPULATION 198n 2000 202(1 Year- Sumner Year- Suimler Year- Sumr�er Insular Area round Increase round Increase round Increase Lloyd Neck 1,150 ND 1,250 ND 1,350 ND Eaton Neck 2,250 ND 2,550 ND 2,900 ND GilgoOak B. 400 1,350 500 1,300 0 0 Fire Island 700 20,000 1,050 19,400 1,350 18,850 Westhampton B. 200 7,000 250 7,100 250 7,200 Nassau Point* 350 250 400 200 450 100 Hog Neck* 1,050 800 1,250 500 1,400 350 Orient 850 2,800 1,050 2,400 1,400 2,500 North Haven* 750 1,300 1,000 1,000 1,300 750 Montauk 2,600 16,500 3,950 16,000 5,450 12,000 Shelter Is. 2,050 4,000 3,000 4,000 3,800 4,000 Fishers Is. 400 1,500 500 1,500 700 1,600 ND -- No data. *Summer increases extrapolated from Riverhead/ Southold and South Fork - Main Body Management Areas. Source: LIRPB. WRMP Table 10-2 INSULAR AREAS: LAND USE ACREAGES 1981 Insular Area Res Cortm Ind Inst Rec/OS Agrr Vac T/U/C 'Dotal Lloyd Neck 600 0 0 10 2,050 0 740 0 3,400 Eatons Neck 650 0 0 15 200 0 585 0 1,450 GilgoOak B. 135 5 0 0 4,325 0 400 0 4,865 Fire Island 1,025 35 0 100 6,120 0 230 0 7,510 WesthanQ. B. 770 110 0 0 820 0 210 0 1,910 Nassau Point 255 0 0 0 40 0 250 0 545 Hog Neck 300 20 0 5 100 125 1,060 0 1,610 Orient 100 20 0 25 650 950 1,545 25 3,315 Plum Island 0 0 0 800 0 0 0 0 800 North Haven 275 0 0 145 200 25 885 0 1,530 Montauk 1,225 310 75 400 3,825 35 4,765 775 11,410 Shelter Is. 1,600 100 25 550 3,575 250 2,400 200 8,700 Fishers Is. 375 45 0 100 350 0 1,900 325 3,095 10-4 Population estimates from the 1980 Census , and LIRPB pro- jections for the years 2000 and 2020, are presented in Table 10-1 . The North Shore areas will experience only modest ( 17%- 29% ) population growth; smaller household sizes are expected to partially offset the increases due to new residential develop- ment . South Shore areas will experience small population increases due to new development; Fire Island will also see an increase in year-round population as summer homes are converted for year-round use, while Gilgo-Oak Beach will probably cease to be used for residential purposes after town leases expire in 2001. On the North Fork, the year-round populations of Nassau Point and Hog Neck will increase about 30 percent, while that of Orient will increase almost 70 percent. Montauk' % year- round population is expected to more than double as a result of new construction and the conversion of many summer homes and motels to full-time residential units . North Haven, Shelter Island, and Fishers Island will experience somewhat smaller population increases of 75-85 percent. Land use acreage estimates made by the LIRPB for 1981, and LIRPB projections for the years 2000 and 2020, are presented in Table 10-2. Most development will consist of residential construction on presently vacant land; some agricultural and institutional lands will also be developed for residential use. Increases in commercial acreage will occur primarily in Mon- tauk, and on Shelter Island and Fishers Island. Orient will retain about three-quarters of its farmland, while Shelter Island and Hog Neck will lose most of their remaining agricul- tural acreage to development. The population and land use data were used to develop water use demand estimates for 1980 and projections for the years 2000 and 2020 (Table 10-3 ) . Residential water demand estimates (with the exception of those for Fishers Island) were based on population figures and the following per capita demand rates: year-round on public water (105 gpcd) , year-round on private wells (80 gpcd) , and summer residents (equivalent to 12 . 5 gpcd over entire year) . Fishers Island usage was based on 10-3 WRMP Table 10-2 (continued) 2000 ,nji 'd.�C' ./L/ i'✓lam: Lloyd Neck 850 0 0 10 2,050 0 490 0 3,400 Eatons Neck 850 0 0 15 200 0 385 0 1,450 Gilgo-Oak B. 135 5 0 0 4,325 0 400 0 4,865 Fire Island 1,100 35 0 100 6,120 0 155 0 7,510 Westhamp. B. 830 120 0 0 820 0 140 0 1,910 Nassau Point 275 0 0 0 40 0 230 0 545 Hog Neck 400 30 0 5 100 60 1,015 0 1,610 Orient 250 25 0 25 700 850 1,440 25 3,315 Plum Island 0 0 0 800 0 0 0 0 800 North Haven 475 0 0 100 200 0 755 0 1,530 Montauk 1,950 335 90 210 4,350 0 3,700 775 11,410 Shelter Is. 2,300 120 25 600 3,600 50 1,805 200 8,700 Fishers Is. 500 60 0 100 360 0 1,745 330 3,095 2020 Insular Area Res Coma Ind Inst Rec/OS Agr Vac T/U/C Total Lloyd Neck 950 0 0 10 2,050 0 390 0 3,400 Eatons Neck 875 0 0 15 200 0 360 0 1,450 Gilgo-Oak B. 0 0 0 0 4,865 0 0 0 4,865 Fire Island 1,175 35 0 100 6,120 0 80 0 7,510 Westhamp. B. 890 130 0 0 820 0 70 0 1,910 Nassau Point 275 0 0 0 40 0 90 0 545 Hog Neck 475 30 0 5 100 25 975 0 1,610 Orient 350 30 0 25 725 725 1,435 25 - 3,315 Plum Island 0 0 0 800 0 0 0 0 800 North Haven 725 0 0 0 200 0 605 0 1,530 Montauk 2,700 360 100 225 4,650 0 2,575 800 11,410 Shelter Is. 3,000 140 5 600 3,650 25 1,080 200 8,700 Fishers Is. 700 85 0 100 375 0 1,505 330 3,095 Res - Residential, Comm - Cannercial; Ind - Industrial; Inst - Institutional Rec/OS - Recreation/Open Space; Agr - Agricultural; Vac - Vacant T/U/C - Transportaticn/Utility/Camumcation Source: LIRPB. 10-5 WRMP Table 10-3 INSULAR AREAS: WATER DEMAND RATES (MGD) _ Residential _ Ccunm/Ind Institutional Insular Area 1980 2000 2020_ 1980 2000_ 2020 1980 2000 2020 Lloyd `deck .09 .10 .11 -- - -- -- -- Eatons Neck .23 .26 .29 -- -- -- -- -- -- Gilgo-Oak B. .06 .07 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Fire Island .32 .35 .38 .02 .02 .02 - -- - Westhamp. B. .11 .12 .12 -- -- -- -- -- -- Nassau Point .03 .03 .04 - -- -- -- - -- Hog Neck .09 .11 .12 -- -- -- -- -- -- Orient .10 .11 .14 -- - -- -- - _ - Plum Island - -- -- -- -- - .10 .10 .10 North Haven .08 .09 .11 -- - -- - - -- Montauk .48 .61 .72 .09 .11 .13 -- -- -- Shelter Is. .21 .28 .35 .03 .03 .04 - -- - Fishers Is. .19 .20 .23 .01 .01 .02 -- -- -- Agricultural Cemetery/Golf C. TOTAL Insular Area 1980 2000 2020 1980 2000 2020 1980 2000 2020 Lloyd Neck - - - - .09 .10 .11 Eatons Neck - -- -- - -- - .23 .26 .29 Gilgo-Oak B. - - -- -- - - .06 .07 -- Fire Island -- -- -- -- -- -- .34 .37 .40 WesthanP. B. - - - - - - .11 .12 _ .12 Nassau Point -- - -- - -- -- .03 .03 .04 Hog Neck .04 .02 .01 - - - .13 .13 .13 Orient .33 .29 .25 - -- - .43 .40 .39 Plizu Island - - - - - - .10 .10 .10 North Haven -- -- -- -- -- -- .08 .09 .11 Montauk - - - - - - .57 .72 .85 Shelter Is. .03 .01 - .01 .01 .01 .28 .33 .40 Fishers Is. - - - .01 .01 .01 .21 .22 .26 -- less than 0. 005 mgd Comm/Ind - Commercial/Industrial; Golf C. - Golf Course 10-6 water supply records . Commercial/industrial, institutional, and cemetery/golf course usage estimates were based on data supplied by the SCWA and the pumping records of motels and Woh� b,is c.l ou ��z1C2i1-. tage changes in acreage. Agricultural pumpages were calculated using the acreages and methodology described in Section 7 . 4. Consumptive use rates (Table 10-4) were calculated using the following percentages of water demands : residential (40%, except 10% for South Shore barrier beach areas) , comm. /ind. (5% ) , agricultural (1000 ) , and cemetery/golf course (100% ) . WRMP Table 10-4 INSULAR AREAS : CONSUMPTIVE USE RATES (MGD) AND WATER DEMANDS AS A PERCENTAGE OF RECHARGE 2020 Percent of Recharge Consumptive Use to Glacial Lens Supply** Insular Area 1980 2000 2020 Recharge* Demand Cons. Use Lloyd Neck .04 .04 .04 5.8 1.9% 0.7% Eatons Neck .09 .10 .12 2.5 2.0% 0.8% GilgoOak B. .01 .01 - 8.4 Magothy Supply Fire Island .28 .29 .29 12.9 Magothy Supply Westhatcp. B. .01 .01 .01 3.3 Magothy Supply Nassau Point .01 .01 .02 1.0 4.0% 2.0% Hog Neck .08 .06 .06 2.8 4.6% 2.1$ Orient .37 .33 .31 5.7 6.8% 5.7% Plum Island .10 .10 .10 1.4 7.1% 7.1% North Haven .03 .04 .04 2.6 4.2% 1.5% Montauk .20 .25 .29 19.6 4.1% 1.5% Shelter Is. .13 .16 .18 15.0 2.7% 1.2% Fishers Is. .11 .12 .13 5.3 Surface Supply * Recharge based on total area and 1.1 mgd/sq mile. ** Lloyd Neck may have fresh water dawn to bedrock. Eatons Neck figures based on 17% local pimpage and conswmptive use. Montauk 2020 demand does not include 0.05 mgd projected to be imported to Napeague from the main body of the South Fork. 10-7 The large residential percentage used for most areas reflects the relatively high ratio of lawn area to household size char- acteristic of low density areas ; the 40 percent value is sim- ilar to that found for the South Fork - Main Body Management Area. Areas on the barrier beach , in contrast, have limited lawn irrigation. The consumptive use rates determined with this methodology are somewhat lower than those presented in Section 7 . 6 , which were based on estimated lawn acreages and a county-wide unit consumptive use rate of 500 gpad, and which did not take into account local conditions that reduce lawn areas and irrigation rates. Sewage effluent discharges for Fire Island (Ocean Beach, which is susceptible to large amounts of infiltration) , Plum Island, Shelter Island, and Fishers Island were included in the consumptive use totals. These discharges ( in mgd for the years 1980, 2000, and 2020, respectively) were as folows: Fire Island ( . 25 , . 25, .25) ; Plum Island ( .10 , . 10 , . 10) ; Shelter Island ( .01 , .03, . 03) ; and, Fishers Island ( . 02, .03, . 03) . Table 10-4 also indicates long-term average recharge rates for the (upper glacial) freshwater lenses of each insular area. These recharge values were calculated by multiplying the entire land area of each insular area by the unit recharge rate (1. 1 mgd/sq mile) . The 2020 water demand and consumptive use rates indicated in Tables 10-3 and 10-4 were then compared to the recharge rates of each area where the upper glacial aquifer is used for water supply. This comparison facilitated the assess- ment of potential developmental impacts on the freshwater lenses of each area. The comparison of 2020 water demands, consumptive use rates, and recharge rates for each area indicated that future development (given present zoning patterns) will have relative- ly little impact on the lens resources, even if 100 percent of the water withdrawn were used consumptively. Projected 2020 water demands are all less than 10 percent of recharge, indica- ting that overall reductions in lens volumes and water table elevations would be less than 5 percent. This result does not 10-8 imply , however, that localized water quantity problems will not arise, or that the potential impacts of prolonged drought can be ignored ( see below) . 1_0. 1. 1_General Recommendations All of the insular areas have a more than adequate quanti- ty of water to meet projected water demands and consumptive use. Localized water supply problems , however, may still occur due to the proximity of the saltwater interface and/or the presence of groundwater pollution. These considerations are the focus of the recommendations discussed below. Other recom- mendations specific to individual insular areas are presented in Section 10 . 1. 2 , while county-wide recommendations (many of which are applicable to the insular areas) are presented in Chapters 11 and 12. The potential for saltwater upconing increases as well pumping rates increase and the depths to the saltwater inter- face decrease ( i. e. , as the shoreline is approached) . Wells, therefore, must be designed carefully using field determina- tions of aquifer thickness. However, as a preliminary planning step, water table elevations and the Ghyben-Herzberg relation- ship ( 40: 1 ratio) can be used to estimate screen intervals and maximum continuous pumping rates (see Section 5. 5) : Pumping Rate Water Table Elevation 50 gpm 2 feet 100 gpm 2. 5 feet 200 gpm 3 feet 500 gpm 4. 5 feet 1000 gpm 5 feet Well designs should be based on long-term water table eleva- tions (corrected for sea level rise) , with well screens instal- led 40 feet below the water table. Smaller homeowner wells (5-10 gpm) located near the shore- line may also be susceptible to saltwater upconing, particular- ly during periods of prolonged drought when pumping needs are 10-9 high and aquifer thicknesses are reduced. The potential for upconing can be significantly reduced, however, by installing weLl screens at least 10 feet above the interface ( 250 ppm chloride level ) . Prolonged ( continuous) pumping of shoreline homeowner wells for such purposes as filling swimming pools should be avoided; instead, alternating periods of pumping and resting should be used (e. g. , pumping every other day) . Voluntary conservation measures should be encouraged to reduce pumping needs and lessen the chances of inducing saltwater upconing in individual wells. Area-wide mandatory restrictions on pumpage and consumptive use, however, are not needed to protect overall volumes of lens resources. Water quality problems related to residential housing are most likely in coastal areas with limited aquifer thicknesses , particularly where private wells cannot be screened 40 feet below the water table as required by SCDHS standards. It is therefore recommended that water quality conditions in coastal areas be carefully monitored, and that municipalities begin planning for public water main extensions or the establishment of water quality treatment districts in areas with existing or potential housing densities greater than one dwelling unit per acre. In addition to limiting housing densities through zon- ing, resource protection measures such as lawn area limitations and fertilizer use restrictions should be considered to reduce irrigation needs and nitrogen loadings to groundwater. Indoor water use conservation measures (see Chapter 8 ) should also be considered to reduce pumping needs and improve the efficiency of on-site sanitary systems. Where water quality problems arise, a number of water supply management options are available: - centralized water distribution - bottled water - individual home (POU/POE) treatment - local pubic water supply development - water importation 10-10 Effective short-term ( interim) solutions include bottled water and centralized water distribution at public facilities such as firehouses ( from a tap or vendinq machine , see Chapter 8 ) . Individual home treatment units are available to correct most water quality problems ; this availability, however, should not diminish groundwater protection efforts. When a large number of houses in an area are affected, water quality treatment dis- tricts can be established to provide household treatment units , but the preferred remedial action from a public health perspec- tive is the provision of public water. Such public supplies can often be developed locally (with or without treatment) , and in a few cases can be imported from outside areas (see below) . 10. 1. 2 Area-Specific Recommendations Lloyd Neck Caumsett State Park and other publicly-owned open space cover about 60 percent of the area. Low-density residential development covers about 20 percent, and will increase to -30 percent by the year 2020 as half of the remaining 700 acres of vacant land are developed. No water quality problems have been experienced or are anticipated. Continued reliance on private wells is recommended. Eatons Neck An estimated 80-85 percent of the residents are served by a SCWA transmission main that extends from the mainland through Asharoken. Distribution mains run throughout the medium den- sity residential area located on the southwest portion of the neck. Some residential areas of Asharoken, however, are not presently served, and main extensions are recommended. Future development is expected to consist of a moderate amount of low-density residential construction. Sufficient public water to serve future development should be available utilizing the existing transmission main. Local supplies could 10-11 be developed, if necessary, to supplement or replace imported water. The SCWA presently owns a site ( for future tank con- struction) on Eatons Neck Road ; this site would have to he expanded to make it suitable for supply development. Gilgo_Oak Beach The small non-community public water systems that supply the area do not provide water during the winter months. As summer homes are converted to year-round residences , a number of homeowners have installed private wells that may be cross- connected with the public supplies through household plumbing systems, thus posing potential health problems. It is there- fore recommended that the present public systems be upgraded to provide reliable year-round service; this would involve hiring year-round plant operators, heating buildings , and replacing (deepening ) portions of service mains. In addition, the three non-community systems in Oak Beach should be interconnected. Fire Island The communities on Fire Island are expected to experience some conversions of seasonal houses to year-round residences , but no significant overall growth. Since Magothy water is available, no water quantity problems are anticipated. Overall water supply capabilities should be improved, however, by in- terconnecting major adjacent community and non-community sys- tems. This would provide greater management flexibility in case of well system failures or other problems. Westhampton Beach Almost no land use or population changes are projected for this insular area, which extends 15 miles from Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet. Most residences on the western two-thirds of the area are supplied by the SCWA, which has a Magothy well to its Dune Road South well field. A 12-inch main extends from Cupsogue Beach to Sedge Island (west of Tiana Beach) and is 10-12 interconnected with distribution systems on the mainland at Westhampton and Quogue. Many of the residences nark facilities , and commercial_ facilities located between Sedge Island and Shinnecock Inlet have experienced chloride problems. A 4-mile extension of the existing main eastward to Shinnecock Inlet is estimated to cost close to $1 million. It is recommended that a feasibility study of this project be conducted. Nassau Point Nassau Point is characterized by extensive medium-density residential development served by private wells. Freshwater lens thicknesses are very limited. Numerous wells have exper- ienced nitrate or chloride problems. Creation of local public supplies or importation of water from the mainland do not appear to be viable options. Establishment of a water quality treatment district is therefore recommended. Great Hog Neck The year-round population of this primarily residential area is expected to increase 30 percent by the year 2020. Increased residential pumpage, however, will be offset by reduced agricultural pumpage; total demand, therefore, will change little. Homeowner wells serve the entire area, and many have been impacted by agricultural chemicals (nitrate and pesticides) . It is recommended that detailed water supply management planning begin for Great Hog Neck, and that the following options be considered. Water ,quality treatment districts could be utilized if present arrangements with pesticide manufactur- ers for filter installation and replacement cannot be extended, or new types of pesticides become problems. A small community water system has been proposed to serve a new condominium project and subdivision; similar small-scale systems (using wells with capacities of about 30-50 gpm) might also be used 10-13 suB�LE NASSAU POINT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION PB V6 P. 0. Box 346 CUTCHoGUF, L. I., N. Y. 11935 September 10, 1990 51`4 1 4 199 Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ATTENTION: Bennett Orlowski RE: Proposed Subdivision Application - Hohn SCTM 1000-118-6-1 and 3 . 1 Gentlemen: I am writing to you on behalf of the members of the Nassau Point Property Owners Association. At our Board of Directors' meeting August 19, 1990, it was unanimously resolved that the position of the Association, with respect to the above application, be conveyed to you. We are unalterably opposed to the proposed subdivision for a number of reasons. The most important being as follows: 1. We have previously furnished your Board with a copy of the Suffolk County Department of Health 1981 Water Study of our area which stressed the need to limit further construction if our limited supply of potable water is to be maintained. Nassau Point's only supply of potable water is the rainfall which collects beneath our property and, as per said study, the saturation point has already been reached. 2 . This proposed subdivision is predicated upon a convoluted series of artificially created property lines dissecting the plot in contravention of the original plan for Nassau Point and disregarding the fact that "wetlands" and a "pond" are included rather than excluded in determining overall acreage. The future of our Town, and particularly Nassau Point, rests with you. Sound planning predicated upon serious environmental Southold Planning Board -2- September 10, 1990 concerns and orderly development would preclude the above mentioned application being given favorable consideration. Please bear in mind that the Town Fathers, in excepting lots on Nassau Point's filed map from the lot area and lot width requirements (two (2) acre zoning) , expressly and specifically stated that the lot area and lot width requirements of the lots on said map would prevail. We do not believe it was ever their intent that existing lots appearing on said map could be wantonly subdivided so as to fall within the "exception" afore- mentioned. V V?AL yours, hn terresi cc: Southold Town Board of Appeals, Gerard Goehringer Supervisor of the Town of Southold, Scott Harris Department of Environmental Conservation Suffolk County Department of Health Services, David Harris NYS co DEVELOPMENT OF NASSAU POINT: IMPACTS ON GROUNDWATER QUANTITY SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, K.D. , M.P.H. COMMISSIONER H. W. DAVIDS, P.E. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PREPARED BY: BUREAU OF WATER RESOURCES JOSEPH H. BALER, P.E. , CHIEF SY F. ROBBINS, HYDROGEOLOGIST DECEMBER 1982 Y TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Summary. ... ...... . ............... .......... . .... .. .... ........ ....... .1 II. Introduction. .. ............. .......... . ..... .. . ... ................ . ..2 III. Existing Freshwater Resources............ . ....... ...... .......... ... .4 IV. Impacts of Drought. .................. .......... ..... ........... .. ....8 V. Impacts of Full Development........... . ... . ....... .................. .8 VI. Impacts of Drought and Full Development. .. .. .... . . ............ ..... .10 Bibliography....... .......... .. ....... . .. ...... .. ... ...... .. ....... .11 Appendix A: Calculations for Region I.. . .. .... .. . ........ .... ... ...A-1 Appendix B: Calculations for Region II. .......... . . ... ..... ... ... ..B-1 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Location Map: Nassau Point.... .. . ..... .... .. .. .. . . ... .......... ... .. .3 2. Regions Used for Groundwater Calculations. ... . ..... .. ... .... ..... . .. .5 3. Freshwater Lenses in Cross Section: Nassau Point.. .. ... ... .. . ....... .9 LIST OF TABLES 1. Summary of Results: Analysis of Nassau Point... .. ....... ..... ... .... .6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS gpd - gallons per day gpd/cap - gallons per day per capita mgd - million gallons per day mil gal - million gallons m.s.l. - mean sea level USGS - United States Geological Survey ii I. SUMMARY The residents of Long Island's Nassau Point rely soley on the small lenses of fresh water below the peninsula for their source of drinking water. The existing number of single family houses (312) is expected to increase to between 485 and 585 units at full development, thus raising con- cerns about the potential depletion of the resource, particularly if the maximum number of units are constructed and drought conditions are exper- ienced. Such depletion of the resource could cause private wells to become contaminated by salt as the freshwater/saltwater interface that delimits the freshwater lenses moves upward. This study utilized an analytical model of Nassau Point's groundwater system to determine the potential impacts of development and drought on the size and shape of the freshwater lenses below the peninsula. Based on con- servative, "worst case" estimates, the study found that: 1) The volume of fresh water normally available below the peninsula as a whole is 609 million gallons; under drought conditions, this volume could be reduced by about 30% to 431 million gallons. 2) The rate of recharge to the lenses under normal rainfall conditions is 0.6 mgd; in comparison, the upper limit of consumptive use at full de- velopment (485-585 dwelling units) is only 0.029-0.035 mgd (or 4.8%- 5.8% of recharge) , which would reduce the volume of available water in storage within the lenses by only 2.5%-3.0% (15-18 million gallons) . 3) The maximum upward movement of the interface due to consumptive use at full development would be only 1.3 feet and would occur at the center of the peninsula, where the lens is normally over 41 feet thick; there would be no appreciable changes near the shoreline, where the lens is thinnest and private wells are most vulnerable. 4) The effects of drought on lens thickness would overshadow those caused by development; maximum reductions could reach 14 feet near the center of the peninsula, of which only about 2 feet would be due to consump- tive use. Thus, the potential impacts of development alone on the overall quanti- ty of fresh water available below Nassau Point are small compared to those of drought, and the difference between 485 and 585 units is insignificant. These findings, however, do not imply that adequate water will be available on every building lot, or that future development will not affect water quantity below isolated spits of land; the problem of groundwater quality is also not addressed. Further study and planning are required. U. INTRODUCTION Nassau Point (also known as Little Hog Neck) is a small peninsula that extends southward from Long Island's North Fork into Little Peconic Bay at Cutchogue, Town of Southold (Figure 0 . The subsurface materials consist of highly permeable sands and gravels of glacial origin (primarily outwash, with some till) . Fresh water below the peninsula is stored within a lens that floats above denser, salty groundwater that has infiltrated the aqui- fer from surrounding tidal waters. The freshwater lens is recharged from above by precipitation; about an equal amount of fresh water is discharged from the lens at the shoreline, thus maintaining an overall balance (dynam- ic equilibrium) . The lens of fresh water is the sole source of drinking water for the residents of the peninsula, where all 312 single family houses utilize pri- vate wells.1 There are 173 vacant single family residential tax parcels on the peninsula, bringing the total number of residential. tax parcels (both developed and undeveloped) to 485. About 15 of these tax parcels could be further subdivided into smaller plots that would conform to the 1 acre (40,000 square foot) area requirement of the Town zoning code, thus yielding another 37 building lots.2 In addition, about 48 other tax parcels con- tain two or more entire subdivision lots from the original "old file" maps for the area; if developed, an additional 63 units could be built.3 Thus, the maximum number of single family houses at full development would be 585, or about 21Z more than the 485 units based on existing residential tax par- cels alone. 1. Most of the existing houses are taxed as year-round residences; less than 10% are taxed as seasonal residences, although a much larger per- centage is probably used seasonally. 2. Many of the undeveloped parcels are "undersized" according to the Town zoning code and the Suffolk County health code (see footnote 3); both codes, however, provide for variances for undersized tax parcels that are in single-and-separate ownership. 3. The 48 tax parcels (some of which already have houses on them) contain 111 subdivision lots, only 25 of which meet the Town zoning code area requirement (40,000 square feet) and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services' area requirement for private wells (also- 40,000 square feet). The "old-file" subdivision maps, however, were exempted from Town zoning requirements; thus, all 111 lots would probably receive Town building permits. -2- T CONNECTICUT I NORTH NEW YORK -� FORK 50-N0 � q��:\[a��sw/ \•�- LONG 150110 3. `s� NEW JERSEY SUFFOLK Y ^ ti�RiYall (`rl jl NASSAU' ♦ ♦• 4ugM Nt // � �aU1e4 % % SIW a-iter old- Alf\ r ) / uubw-an&" amne NASSAU POINT �t nna 1111 l PecQhic Bay It I s1 aln Great Peconic Bay 'vi.� iia E s 7 tae SUN ,(.y✓ _ if + F -V�o M th � G 1>,N.F.a� 1 �' r■eai Mme.. �,. laaaa am F o.ee lig w ata+a 1 ! - ski mad aaVIM e Iecock o Bay FIG• 1 LOCATION MAP: NASSAU POINT -3- The purpose of this report is to assess the impacts of residential de- velopment on the quantity of Nassau Point's overall groundwater resource. . Potential changes in the size and shape of the major freshwater lenses below the peninsula caused by the ultimate development of 485-585 single family houses are calculated, and the overall availability of fresh ground water on the peninsula is assessed. This report does not, however, attempt to deter- mine the availability of fresh water under individual building lots, or the impacts of development on groundwater quality, which may be significant. The only quality impacts discussed in this report are potential increases in chloride concentrations that may result from the upward movement of the freshwater/saltwater interface that delimits the freshwater lenses. III. EXISTING FRESHWATER RESOURCES The shape of the freshwater lenses below Nassau Point are influenced by the numerous tidal coves, ponds, and lagoons that border and cut into the peninsula. The freshwater resource, therefore, is made up of numerous, ir- regularly shaped lenses. In order to simplify the analyses made in this report, the two major lenses below the peninsula were represented (approxi- mated) by the two regions shown in Figure 2 -- one elliptically shaped (Re- gion I) , and one rectangularly shaped (Region II). The combined area of the two regions is 0.58 square miles (see Table 1), which is about 23% less than the total land area of the peninsula (0.75 square miles). Therefore, totals for these two regions of, such parameters as the rate of precipitation re- charge to the aquifer, and the volume of available fresh water in storage within the aquifer, represent minimum (conservative) estimates for the pen- insula as a whole. The use of these conservative figures, however, allowed "worst case" impacts of development to be calculated. The volumes of water recharged by precipitation to the lenses under Regions I and II are shown in Table 1. The conservative estimate of total recharge under normal (average) rainfall conditions (44 inches/year or 0.01 feet/day) is 0.6 million gallons per day (mgd); this estimate is based on the assumption that 50% of the rainfall is lost to evapotranspiration, and 50% percolates to the aquifer.4 - The volumes of water available for pumping from Regions I and II under natural conditions (normal rainfall, no consumptive use) are 475 and 134 million gallons, respectively; thus, a- conservative estimate of the total available resource under the entire peninsula is 609 mil gal (Table 1) . 4. Calculations for Regions I and II are presented in Appendice A and B. -4- ••s NO/Ox l H•rler4oe 2900' 1 4600' ¢£-(,c, 4900' II S FIG. 2 REGIONS USED FOR GROUNDWATER CALCULATIONS r�K -5- TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF RESULTS: ANALYSIS OF NASSAU POINT Parameter Region I Region II Total 1. Area (sq miles) 0.376 0.202 - 0.578 2. Recharge Rate (mgd)"' a. natural conditions(") 0.392 (100%) 0.211 (100%) 0.603 (100%) b. drought conditions(`) 0.196 (50.0%) 0.105 (50.0%) 0.301 (50.0%) c. natural - develop.(') (1) . minimum (485Ya' 0.371 (94.6X) 0.203 (96.4%) 0.574 (95.22) (2). maximum (585)(f) 0.367 (93.5X) 0.201 (95.4X) 0.568 (94.2%) d. drought S develop cs) (1) . minimum (485)(0' 0.175 (44.5%) 0.098 (46.4X) 0.273 (45.3%) (2). maximum (585)(f) 0.171 (43.5%) 0.095 (45.2X) 0.266 (44.11) 3. Avail% Water (mil gal)0) a. natural conditions(') 475 (100%) 134 (1002) 609 (100%) b. drought coaditions(D 336 (70.7%) 94.7 (70.7%) 431 (70.7%) c. full development°`) (1) . minimum (485)(`) 462 (97.3%) 132 (98.2%) 594 (97.5%) (2). maximum (585)") 460 (96.8%) 131 (97.7%) 591 (97.0%) d. drought 6 develop") (1) . minimum (485)(`) 317 (66.7X) 91.4 (68.2%) 408 (67.7%) (2) . maximum (585)"' 313 (66.0%) 90.0 (67.27) 403 (66.21) 4. Max. Lens Thick. (ft)('' a. natural conditions(l) 41.4 (1002) 18.4 (100%) -- b. drought conditions(i) 29.3 (70.7X) 13.0 (70.7%) -- c. full developmenth) (1) . minimum (485)4) 40.3 (97.3%) 18.1 (98.2%) --- (2). maximum (585)") 40.1 (96.8X) 18.0 (97.7%) -- d. drought S developP (1) . minimum (485)(`) 27.6 (66.7%) 12.5 (68.2%) -- (2). maximum (585)(n 27.3 (66.0%) 12.4 (67.2%) -- -6- TABLE 1 continued Parameter Region I Region II Total 5. Consumptive Use Rate(" a. minimum (485 units) (1) . vol. rate (gpd) 2.14 x 104 7.68 x 103 2.91 x 104 (2). X nat. recharge 5.57. 3.67 4.87 b. maximum (585 units) (1) . vol. rate (gpd) 2.54 x 104 9.66 x 103 3.51 x 104 (2). 7 nat. recharge 6.5% 4.67 5.87 (a) . Volume of water recharged to lens under each region (W x Area) . (b) . Natural conditions — periods of normal rainfall (44 inch/year). W . Drought conditions -- periods of reduced rainfall (22 inch/year) . (d) . Natural recharge minus consumptive use (2.a - 5.a or 5.b). (e) . Based on tax parcels (Region I 357, Region II 128, Total 485) . (f) . Tax parcels + subdivision lots (Region 1424, Region II 161 , Total 585). (g). Drought recharge minus consumptive use (2.b - 5.a or 5.b). (h). Vol. of water available for pumping (lens vol. x specific yield (0.22)) . M . Periods of normal (average) rainfall and no consumptive use. (j). Periods of reduced rainfall and no consumptive use. (k). Full development — natural rainfall conditions and consumptive use. (1). Drought S develop. — drought rainfall conditions and consumptive use. (m). Region I at the center axis; Region II at the groundwater divide. (n). Upper limit est. based on 60 gpd/household; may be over 4 times too high. -7- The calculated shapes of the freshwater lenses below Regions I and II under natural conditions are shown in cross section in Figure 3. The maxi- mum thickness of each lens occurs at its center (furthest inland); Region I has a maximum thickness of 41.4 feet at its center axis, while Region II has a maximum thickness of 18.4 feet at the groundwater divide (Table 1) . IV. IMPACTS OF DROUGHT The impacts of drought were determined by reducing the recharge rate by 502 (to 11 inches/year or 0.0025 feet/day). The result was to reduce the volume of available water in storage below the peninsula and the depth of the interface by about 302 (Table 1) .5 Under drought conditions, the to- tal volume of available water would be reduced by 178 mil gal, to 431 mil gal (Table 1) . *Maximum reductions in aquifer thickness would occur at the center axis of Region I (12.1 feet) and along the groundwater divide in Re- gion II (5.4 feet) . These changes are shown graphically in Figure 3. Such changes in the position of the freshwater/saltwater interface could cause a significant increase in chloride concentrations in private wells now screen- ed in the lower portions of the aquifer, especially those wells located fur- thest inland. V. IMPACTS OF FULL DEVELOPMENT The impacts of the consumptive use of water at full development on the sizes and shapes of the freshwater lenses were determined by reducing the re- charge rate to the aquifer (under natural conditions) by the rate at which water would be lost to the system (consumed).6 The "upper limit" esti- mates of consumptive use at minimum full development (485 units) and maximum full developoment (585 units) are 29,100 gpd and 35,100 gpd, respectively (Table 1). These upper limit values are based on a 60 gpd/household con- sumptive use rate, which may be more than four times the actual rate for the Nassau Point peninsula.7 Nevertheless, the use of these upper limit val- ues, along with the conservative estimates of the size and shape of the freshwater resource, allowed "worst case" impacts to be assessed. 5. Lens volume and thickness are proportional to the square root of the recharge rate; (0.50)}=0.707, see Appendices A and B. 6. The rate of consumptive use is equal to the difference between the rate of groundwater withdrawal (pumpi.r.g) and the rate at which used water is . returned to the aquifer via cesspools or lawns (irrrigation). 7. This assumes a 100 gpd/cap water use rate, a 202 consumptive use per- centage, and an average, year-round household size of 3.0 people per household (see Appendix A, Section A.VI). -8- REGION I WATER TABLE NORMAL DROUGHT � I.a 0.3• mal 3.0• CENTRAL AXIS IO.O• 13A' 20.0' 25.0• INTERFACE 30.0• NORMAL DEVELOPMENT 33.01 DROUGHT DROUGHT Q DEVELOPMENT 40.01 O 300' 1000' 1300' 2000' (a) REGION II WATER TABLE NORMAL DROUGHT r O.3• mol GROUNDWATER 2.5' DIVIDE 5.01 7.5 INTERFACE 10.04 NORMAL DEVELOPMENT - 123' DROUGHT DROUGHT !1 DEVELOPMENT 15.01 17.3' ~ 20.0' 0 230• SOO' 750• 1o001 (6) FIG. 3 FRESHWATER LENSES IN CROSS SECTION: NASSAU POINT rrr -9- The upper limit consumptive use rates represent 4.8%-5.8% of the total natural recharge rate to the aquifer (Table 1). Since the volume of avail- able water in storage is proportional to the square root of the recharge rate, reducing the recharge rate by the consumptive use rates would reduce the total volume of available water by 15-18 million gallons (2.5X-3.0X). Aquifer thickness, which is also proportional to the square root of the re- charge rate, would be similarly affected. The maximum thickness of Region I, which occurs at its center axis, would be reduced by 1.1-1.3 feet (2.7%- 3.2%); the maximum thickness of Region II, which occurs along the ground- water divide, would be reduced by 0.3-0.4 feet (1.8X-2.3X) . The changes in interface position due to development are shown in cross section in Figure 3. Since aquifer thickness would be reduced by a percent- age, the largest changes would occur furthest inland; reductions would de- crease toward the shoreline, and would be smallest where the lens is thin- nest and private wells are most vulnerable. It is unlikely, therefore, that private wells would be impacted by the effects on groundwater quantity of development alone. VI. IMPACTS OF DROUGHT AND FULL DEVELOPMENT The impacts of the consumptive use of water it full development under drought conditions were determined by reducing the drought recharge rate by the consumptive use rate. The total volume of available water in storage would be reduced by 201-206 mil gal (32.3%-33.8%) when compared to natural conditions, and by 23-28 mil gal (5.3%-6.5%) when compared to drought condi- tions alone (Table 1) . Maximum aquifer thicknesses would be reduced by 1.7- 2.0 feet (5.8%-5.8X) in Region I, and by 0.5-0.6 feet (3.8%-4.6X) in Region II, when compared to drought conditions alone (Table 1 and Figure 3) . In terms of natural aquifer thickness, the largest decrease (14.1 feet) would occur at the center of Region I, of which 12.1 feet would be due to drought, and 2.0 feet would be due to development (585 units). Clearly, the impacts of drought on groundwater quantity would overshadow those of development, even if the maximum number of houses is built. -10- BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Crandell, H.C. 1963. Geology and Ground-Water Resources of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. USGS Water-Supply Paper 1619-GG. 2. Fetter, C.W. Jr. 1972. Position of the Saline Water Interface beneath Oceanic Islands. Water Resources Research 8(5):1307. Oct. 1972. 3. McClymonds, N.E. and O.L. Franke. 1972. Water-Transmitting Properties of Aquifers on Long Island, New York. USGS Prof. Paper 627-E. -11- APPENDIX A CALCULATIONS FOR REGION I A.I AREA Region I is elliptical (Figure 3) , with dimensions 2900 feet (east- west) and 4600 feet (north-south). The area of an ellipse is equal to Crab, where a and b are the semi-axes.1 The area of Region I is therefore: nab = Tr(1450)(2300) - 1.05 x 107ft2 - 0.376 sq miles This area is equivalent to the area of a circle with a radius of about 1830 feet.2 A.II VOLUMETRIC RECHARGE RATES: NATURAL AND DROUGHT CONDITIONS The volume of water recharged daily by precipitation to the aquifer below Region I is equal to the area multiplied by the recharge rate per unit area. For Nassau Point, the estimated natural recharge rate per unit area is 50% of the 44 inch/year precipitation rate -- 22 inches/year (0.005 ft/day). she volumetric recharge rate is -thus: (1.05 x 107ft2)(0.005 ft/day) = 5.24 x 104ft3/day = 0.392 mgd Under drought conditions, when the recharge rate per unit area is assumed to be reduced by 50% to 0.0025 ft/day, the volumetric recharge rate would also be halved to 0.196 mgd. A.III VOLUME OF AVAILABLE WATER: NATURAL CONDITIONS The volume of the freshwater lens below a cicular oceanic island is given by: Volume of lens - 9.483 (W/K)}R3 where W - recharge rate per unit area (ft/day); K - hydraulic conductivity of aquifer (ft/day); and, R - radius of island (feet). 1. The area of a circle, which is a special form of an ellipse in which a - b = r, where r is the radius, is �r2. 2. See Section A.III. A-1 The volume of the lens contains both solid aquifer material and water. The amount of water available for withdrawal is equal to the specific yield (S) of the aquifer times the volume of the lens, thus: Volume of available water - S 9.483 (W/K)fR3 For Nassau Point, Region I, the following input values were used: W - recharge rate - 22 inches/year - 0.005 ft/day K - hydraulic conductivity3 - 200 ft/day R - island radius 1830 feet S = specific yield = 0.22 (Crandell, 1963) The volume of fresh water available from the lens under natural conditions is therefore: (0.22) 9.483 (0.005/200)}(1830)3 = 6.35 x 107ft3 = 475 mil gal A.IV THICKNESS OF THE AQUIFER: NATURAL CONDITIONS The height above mean sea level (m.s.l.) of the water table on a circu- lar oceanic island is given by: r h(r) = I W (R2- r2)li I` 82 K J where W, K, and R are defined as in Section A.III, and h(r) - height of water table above m.s.l. at position r (feet); and, r = distance from center axis of island to position r (feet) . According to the Ghyben/Herzberg theory, the depth of the freshwater/salt- water interface below m.s.l. at location r is 40h(r) , and the total thick- ness of the freshwater lens is 41h(r) - Using the above formula, and the input values listed in Section A.III, the following results were calculated: 3. Upper glacial aquifer, north central Suffolk (McClymonds and Franke, 1972, Table 6) . A-2 dist. from dist. from height of depth of thick. of axis shoreline water table interface aquifer r R-r h 40h 41h 0 1830 1.01 40.4 41.4 830 1000 0.90 36.0 36.9 1330 500 0.69 27.8 28.5 1580 250 0.51 20.4 20.9 1780 50 0.23 9.4 9.6 1830 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 These values were plotted to give the curve shown in Figure 3(a). The cal- culations show that there is about 10 feet of aquifer thickness 50 feet from the shoreline, and a maximum thickness of 41.4 feet at the center of the island, where the water table elevation is at its maximum (1 foot); these values are consistent with data from private wells on Nassau Point. A-V IMPACTS OF DROUGHT CONDITIONS The impacts of drought conditions on the size and shape of the lens were assessed by reducing the recharge rate by 50% to 11 inches/year (0.0025 ft/day). Since both the volume of available water in storage and the thick- ness of the lens are proportional to the square root of the recharge rate, each would be reduced to (50%)f = 70.7% of the natural value, a reduction of about 29%, thus: (0.707) (475 mil gal) - 336 mil gal (0.707) (41.4 feet) = 29.3 feet A.VI CONSUMPTIVE USE RATES AT FULL DEVELOPMENT The ultimate number of houses within Region I is estimated to be be- tween 357 and 424. If the average number of people per household is as- sumed to be 3.0, and the consumptive use rate is assumed to be 20 gpd/cap (20% of 100 gpd/cap water usage) , then the per household consumption rate is 60 gpd. The consumptive use rates for Region I at full development are thus: (357) (60) = 2.14 x 104 gpd (424) (60) - 2.54 x 104 gpd A-3 which are 5.5% and 6.5% of the natural recharge rate to Region I, respec- tively. These figures represent "upper limit" estimates of consumptive use. The average household size used in their computation (3.0) is somewhat larg- er than the average for the Cutchogue-New Suffolk area (2.6) , according to the 1980 Census. Many of the houses on the peninsula are seasonal, and would not draw on the resource year-round. The per capita usage rate (100 gpd) is a standard sewer design criteria that assumes mixed land use (com- mercial, industrial, residential) and is probably too large for an area like Nassau Point that has only single-family residential development; the Suf- folk County Water Authority estimates that the average usage rate in such residential areas of Suffolk County is about 60 gpd/cap. In addition, the 20% consumptive use percentage is also a general criteria and is probably too large for an area with small residential lawns, where watering require- ments and resultant evapotranspiration losses are small; a 10% figure is probably more accurate. Using the lower household size and per capita con- sumption rates, the per household consumption rate would be 15.6 gpd, or only 26% of the upper limit value, and would be even smaller if seasonal occupation of some of the houses is taken into account. In subsequent calculations, the upper limit estimates of consumptive use rates at full development are used to evaluate worst case impacts. It should be kept in mind that these values may be over four times as much as the actual ultimate consumptive use rates. A.VII IMPACTS OF CONSUMPTIVE USE AT FULL DEVELOPMENT: NATURAL CONDITIONS Since private wells are fairly evenly distributed over the area of Re- gion I, the effects of consumptive use at full development on the size and shape of the freshwater lens could be determined by reducing the recharge rate (under natural conditions) by the rate of consumptive use. For minimum full development (357 units) this gives: (3.92 x 105gpd) - (2.14 x 104gpd) - 3.71 x 105gpd - 0.371 mgd This rate is equal to 94.6% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 5.4% less than the natural recharge rate. Since both the volume of available water in 4. See Sections A.II and A.VI. Dividing the volumetric recharge rate by the area of Region I gives the recharge rate per unit area (W) . A-4 storage and the maximum thickness of the lens are proportional to the square root of the recharge rate, both would be reduced by 2.7%, thus:5 (0.973) (475 mil gal) = 462 mil gal (0.973) (41.4 feet) = 40.3 feet For maximum full development (424 units), the reduced recharge rate is: (3.92 x 105gpd) - (2.54 x 104gpd) = 3.67 x 105gpd = 0.367 mgd This rate is equal to 93.6% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 6.4% less than the natural recharge rate. The volume of available water in storage and the maximum lens thickness, therefore, would be reduced by 3.2% to:6 (0.968) (475 mil gal) = 460 mil gal (0.968) (41.4 feet) = 40.1 feet A.VIII COMBINED IMPACTS OF DROUGHT AND FULL DEVELOPMENT The combined effects of drought conditions and consumptive use at full development on the size and shape of the freshwater lens were determined by reducing the recharge rate (under drought conditions) by the rate of._ con- sumptive use.7 For minimum full development (357 units) , the reduced re- charge rate is: (1 .96 x 105gpd) - (2.14 x 104gpd) = 1.75 x 105gpd 0.175 mgd This rate is equal to 44.5% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 55.5% less than the natural rate. Since both the volume of available :rater in storage and the maximum thickness of the freshwater lens are proportional to the square root of the recharge rate, both would be reduced 33.3%, thus:8 (0.667) (475 mil gal) = 317 mil gal (0.667) (41.4 feet) = 27.6 feet 5. (0.946)1 = 0.973 6. (0.936)1 = 0.968 7. See Sections A.II and A.VI. 8. (0.445)} = 0.667 A-5 For maximum full development (424 units) , the reduced recharge rate is: (1.96 x 105gpd) - (2.54 x 104gpd) = 1.71 x 103gpd - 0.171 mgd This rate is equal to 43.5% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 56.5% less than the natural rate. The volume of available water in storage and the maximum lens thickness, therefore, would be reduced by 34.0X, thus:9 (0.660) (475 mil gal) - 313 mil gal (0.660) (41.4 feet) - 27.3 feet r 9. (0.435)+ = 0.660 A-6 APPENDIX B CALCULATIONS FOR REGION II B.I AREA Region II is rectangular (Figure 3) , with dimensions 1150 feet (east- west) and 4900 feet (north-south). Its area, therefore, is equal to: (1150)(4900) = 5.64 x 106ft2 = 0.202 sq miles B.II VOLUMETRIC RECHARGE RATES: NATURAL AND DROUGHT CONDITIONS The volume of water recharged daily by precipitation to the aquifer below Region II is equal to the area multiplied by the recharge rate per unit area. For Nassau. Point, the estimated natural recharge rate per unit area is 50% of the 44 inch/year precipitation rate -- 22 inches/year (0.005 ft/day) . The volumetric recharge rate is thus: (5.64 x 106ft2)(0.005 ft/day) - 2.82 x 104ft3/day 0.211 mgd Under drought conditions, when the recharge rate per unit area is assumed to be reduced by 50% to 0.0025 ft/day, the volumetric recharge rate would also be halved to 0.105 mgd. B.III VOLUME OF AVAILABLE WATER: NATURAL CONDITIONS The volume of the freshwater lens below a rectangular oceanic island is given by: Volume of lens = 10.06 (W/K)f L a2 where W - recharge rate per unit area (ft/day); K = hydraulic conductivity of aquifer (ft/day); L = length of island (feet); and, a - distance from groundwater divide to shoreline (feet) . The volume of the lens contains both solid aquifer material and water. The amount of water available for withdrawal is equal to the specific yield (S) of the aquifer.times the volume of the lens, thus: Volume of available water - S 10.06 (W/K)} L a2 B-1 For Nassau Point, Region II, the following input values were used: W - recharge rate = 22 inches/year = 0.005 ft/day K = hydraulic conductivity' = 200 ft/day L = island length = 4900 feet a = island half-width = 575 feet S = specific yield = 0.22 (Crandell, 1963) The volume of fresh water available from the lens under natural conditions is therefore: (0.22) 10.06 (0.005/200)1(4900)(575)2 - 1.79 x 107ft3 = 134 mil gal B.IV THICKNESS OF THE AQUIFER: NATURAL CONDITIONS The height above mean sea level (m.s.l.) of the water table on a rec- tangular oceanic island is given by: h(x) W Cat- x2) - [ 41 K where W, K, and a are defined as in Section B.III, and h(x) - height of water table above m.s.l. at position x (feet); and, x = distance from groundwater divide (center line) to x (feet). According to the Ghyben/Herzberg theory, the depth of the freshwater/salmi water interface below m.s.l. at location x is 40h(x) , and the total thick- ness of the freshwater lens is 41h(x). Using the above formula, and the input values listed in Section B.III, the following results were calculated: dist. from dist. from height of depth of thick. of divide shoreline water table interface aquifer x a-x h 40h 41h 0 575 0.45 18.0 18.4 275 300 0.39 15.6 16.0 375 200 0.34 13.6 13.9 475 100 0.25 10.0 10.2 525 50 0.1E 7 .2 7.4 575 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 B-2 These values were plotted to give the curve shown in Figure 3(b) . The cal- culations show that there is about 10 feet of aquifer thickness 100 feet from the shoreline, and a maximum thickness of 18.4 feet at the center line of the island, where the water table elevation is at its maximum (0.45 feet); these values are consistent with data from private wells on Nassau Point. B.V IMPACTS OF DROUGHT CONDITIONS The impacts of drought conditions on the size and shape of the lens were assessed by reducing the recharge rate by 50% to 11 inches/year (0.0025 ft/day) . Since both the volume of available water in storage and the thick- ness of the lens are proportional to the square root of the recharge rate, each would be reduced to (50%)} - 70.77 of the natural value, a reduction of about 29%, thus: (0.707) (134 mil gal) - 94.7 mil gal (0.707) (18.4 feet) - 13.0 feet B.VI CONSUMPTIVE USE RATES AT- FULL DEVELOPMENT The ultimate number of houses within Region II is estimated to ,be be- tween 128 and 161. If the average number of people per household is as- sumed to be 3.0, and the consumptive use rate is assumed to be 20 gpd/cap (i.e. , 20% of 100 gpd water usage) , then the per household consumption rate is 60 gpd. The consumptive use rates for Region II at full development are thus: (128) (60) - 7.68 x 103 gpd (161) (60) = 9.66 x 103 gpd which are 3.6% and 4.6% of the natural recharge rate to Region II, respec- tively. Again, these values are upper limit estimates, and may be over four times the actual ultimate consumptive use rates (see Section A.VI). 1. Upper glacial aquifer, north central Suffolk (McClymonds and Franke, 1972, Table 6). B-3 B.VII IMPACTS OF CONSUMPTIVE USE AT FULL DEVELOPMENT: NATURAL CONDITIONS Since private wells are fairly evenly distributed over the area of Re- gion II, the effects of consumptive use at full development on the size and shape of the freshwater lens could be determined by reducing the recharge rate (under natural conditions) by the rate of consumptive use. For minimum full development (128 units) this gives: (2.11 x 105gpd) - (7.68 x 103gpd) = 2.03 x 105gpd - 0.203 mgd This rate is equal to 96.4% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 3.6% less than the natural recharge rate. Since both the volume of available water in storage and the maximum thickness of the lens are proportional to the square root of the recharge rate, both would be reduced by 1.8%, thus:2 (0.982) (134 mil gal) - 132 mil gal (0.982) (18.4 feet) - 18.1 feet For maximum full development (161 units) , the reduced recharge rate is: (2.11 x 10-"gpd) - (9.66 x 103gpd) - 2.01 x 105gpd = 0.201 mgd This rate is equal to 95.4% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 4.6%_less than the natural recharge rate. The volume of available water in storage and the maximum lens thickness, therefore, would be reduced by 2.3% to:3 (0.977) (134 mil gal) - 131 mil gal (0.977) (18.4 feet) = 18.0 feet B.VIII COMBINED IMPACTS OF DROUGHT AND FULL DEVELOPMENT The combined effects of drought conditions and consumptive use at full development on the size and shape of the freshwater lens were determined by reducing the recharge rate (under drought conditions) by the rate of con- sumptive use. For minimum full development (128 units) , the reduced re- charge rate is: (1.05 x 105gpd) - (7.68 x 103gpd) = 9.78 x 104gpd = 0.098 mgd 2. (0.964)1 - 0.982 3. (0.954)1 - 0.977 4. See Sections B.II and B.VI.- B-4 This rate is equal to 46.4% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 53.6% less than the natural rate. Since both the volume of available water in storage and the maximum thickness of the freshwater lens are proportional to the square root of the recharge rate, both would be reduced 31.8%, thus:5 (0.682) (134 mil gal) - 91.4 mil gal (0.682) (18.4 feet) - 12.5 feet For maximum full development (161 units) , the reduced recharge rate is: (1.05 x 105gpd) - (9.66 x 103gpd) - 9.53 x 104gpd - 0.095 mgd This rate is equal to 45.2% of the natural recharge rate, i.e. , is 54.8% less than the natural rate. The volume of available water in storage and the maximum lens thickness, therefore, would be reduced by 32.8%, thus:6 (0.672) (134 mil gal) - 90.0 mil gal (0.672) (18.4 feet) = 12.4 feet 5. (0.464)# = 0.682 6. (0.452)i - 0.672 B-5 pe> mqs d � 29 AUGUST l99S TC - JOHN M. BREDEMEYER , IlI . PRES , TOWK OF SOUT�OLP TUSTEE� OR LESSAP D, TOWN �F SOUTTH3LD BUlLDING DEPT . ){ BENNETT ORLOWSKI , TOWN OF SOUTHOL-D PLANNlNG BOARD �RDM - ARNOLD M. BEHRER , JR . , M. D . , CKR. CONSERVATION -9MMITTE-- , NASSA; � POINT P�CJPERTY OWNERS' AScOC |~/ S�GJEC� - TF.,HSM{TTAL OF COPIES OF D'CCUMPNTS ; | � � CCPYOF LETT ET� TO DR " DAVID HARRIC ` COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SIERVICES , SUFFOLK COUNT', � OF ' INVESTIGATION OF GROUND WATES QUALITY OF T�4E NASSAU POINT PENlMSULA . '` � ° `3 NASSAU POINT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION P. O. Box 346 CUTCHOGLJE, L. I., N. Y. 11935 29 August 1990 Dr. David Harris, Commissioner AUG' Health Services Department of Suffolk County County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 Dear Dr. Harries Your attention is called to the enclosed copy of the report of a study c. 1970-1971 by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Division of Environmental Health Services, entitled "Investigation of Ground Water Quality of the Nassau Point Peninsula, Town of Southold, Suffolk County." Nassau Point (Little Hog's Neck) , from the point of view of ground water, is actually an island. Its residents depend upon private wells in an aquifer replenished only by precipitation which falls upon this land mass. Drought and/or overpumping threaten salt water intrusion to some of the wells on the periphery. You will note that one of the recommendations of the study is the establishment of low density zoning area (350 homes) . It is estimated that this number has already been exceeded. Therefor, on behalf of the Nassau Point Property Owners' Association, I reslectfully request that your department declare a temporary moratorium on the building of additional homes until such time as it can document to the Association that there will be adequate quantities of potable drinking water available. Sincerely your*, ,( Arnold M. Behrer. Jr. , M.D. , Chairman. Conservation Committee P. 0. Box 523 Cutchogue, New York 11935 cc: Town of Southold Trustees, John M. Bredemeyer, III Town of Southdld Building Department, Victor Lessard Town of Southold Planning Board, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. John Slattery, President, Nassau Point Property Owners' Association 111 , ;� f N� Jte D-te filo 3 1 19`9`f J INVESTIGATION OF GROUND WATER QUALITY OF THE NASSAU POINT PENINSULA TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Herbert W. Davids , Director Division of Environmental Health Services �r Nassau Point ovN ) ! 5 ' , IK ,D v 1 J T-M 14 E p N 1O.Wo' o $CAlf 20,000' Fig. 1 - Nassau Point - Little Hog Neck - Town of Southold Location : Nassau Point, also known as Little Hog Neck , is. a peninsula located on the south shore of the North Fork in the Town of Southold , Suffolk County ( Fig. 1 ) . The peninsula has an approximate land area of 0 . 75 sq . mi . and is surrounded by salt water bodies . Great Peconic Bay borders the peninsula on the west and the Little Peconic Bay on the east. Haywaters and Broadwaters separate the peninsula from the mainland on the north . A causeway, approximately 1500 feet in length by 150 feet in width , connects the peninsula to the mainland . Geology : Underlying soil conditions of Nassau Point consist of primarily glacial outwash deposits . These deposits are chiefly sands and gravels of Upper Pliestocene age . An area , near Wunneweta Pond , consists of ground moraine deposits which are a mixture of clay , sand and pebbles to boulder sized gravel . Shoreline deposits of .recent geologic age comprise the east coast of the Point. This formation is well sorted sand and gravel deposited by currect and wave action . The topography elevations range .from sea level to over 50 feet. Climate : The predominate climate for the area is temperate marine . Temperatures are moderate and precipitation is abundant during the fall , winter and spring. Summer usually is dry . The mean annual precipitation is 44 . 5 inches . The April -September mean precipitation is 20. 5 inches . /v0 N M COo V v cc � z w J Sca Lt�c.. 1 I ` kMciw✓ — Scw Ccrc.� ? Su /00 C•.irrr Gt d�•?galr l Thq.J HO si+.aT 'rSo • 300 SALT WIaTEZ \ / C4aOd.0( CONT(IT / wlua 16,000 - 16,00. S S J Fig - 2 - Cross Section from L . I . Sound to Little Peconic Bay - C'acrn �TviahC' - .. . -• .. li7e-u o,r�nonl _ S✓w.Fw�F ��-)oef ,riw�.Lwrls�I A, �✓•r?'�L .... � � to Srti(ww3�ER• � « ygPo.t. Te�,wp CIR uvNJ OGCHJ, ♦yO Ww RR. ST°rt wvC pin, 3 � y �• ��n.ni( Cvr.l � - -2- Ground Water : A small body of fresh water underlies Nassau Point ( Fig . 2) . Precipitation provides the only source of replenishment of the ground water reservior. A part of the precipitation flows overland to the surrounding salt water bodies and fresh water ponds . A part is returned to the atmosphere by evaporation and by trans- piration of plants . The remainder of the precipitation seeps into the ground . Some of the seepage into the ground eventually reaches the ground water reservior and becomes available for withdrawal by wells ( Fig. 3) . At the present time , all the homes on the peninsula use private wells . Information supplied by individual homeowners indicate that well depths vary 10 to 100 feet . It is estimated that approximately 5 inches of the annual precipitation enters the surface waters as direct runoff and 17 inches is lost throu, the combined effects of evaporation and transpiration (evapotranspir- ation) . Recharge to the ground water reservior is the difference between the amount of precipitation and the sum of direct runoff and evapotrans- piration . The annual recharge for the Nassau Point area is 160 million gallons . A 10% reduction is included to allow for local clay soil conditions , paving , and residential homes . All the fresh ground water available for use on the peninsula is contained under water table conditions in upper Pliestocene deposits . Since the Point is virtually surrounded by salt water, the area is _ .— lnNo S�arAIC WArce rnotir . WAM \ WR2 / I t� SAI C oo f ae 4 wArfie 'l WArreL BE..ow SFA �FrEL. NC'CtNr of flLfS,I bJnr+C.e \ V A134ve !EA Lt3✓CL. 04 c4 2 SPC'CjfiG C14AVIr7 of Snlr WACf R, AJC,. VAwf e L Fig . 4 - Ghyben-Herzberg Principle I W�aL AE.�,4 P✓M7C7 �qwe Su•I fniQ , SC♦ LIJCL _�_ - –� \ v ' / .SAw* ANO Gda✓!a• C.u•J t*�N��71, Sn�r 4rnrFi6 Ccy4-4410f co,✓rr•+r �e�[ or Sn..rW,rl.�•r\ �/ 16,000 -ly� eoo Pp�t) —.C.+n..0 nw.l l..r.,,,cL Cu.r�..✓„u c. F2Cs'/ WArCR i ' C'it�•r eut CaN 7YNT At I Fig. 5 - Vertical Movement of Salty Ground Water. Toward a Pumping Well -3- treated as an island of ground water or a discrete fresh water lens . The specific gravity of the fresh water is less than that of the underlying salt water , therefore , the fresh water tends to float on the salt water within the boundaries of the island generally according to the Ghyben-Herzberg principle (Fig . 4) . This principle states that equilibriun , the depth of fresh water below sea level at any point on the island , is proportional to the fresh water head above sea level and dependent on the relation of the specific gravities of fresh and salt water. Generally , the relationship shows that fresh water would extend 40 feet below sea level for each foot it extends above sea level . This theory does not take into account the zone of mixed water around the fresh water lens . Little Hog Neck , based on 1963 report, contains a fresh water mound with a crest altitude of slightly more than 1 foot. A report by the Geological Survey of water table elevations as of March 1970 was not of sufficient detail to include Nassau Point since the contour map developed had elevations shown at 5 ' intervals . The movement of the ground water moves toward the surrounding salt water bodies along flow lines whose direction is normal or perpendicular to the water table contour. It is estimated by the USGS that there is 600 million cubic feet of deposits satuated with fresh water. This water is not totally available The specific yield of the aquifer is assumed to be about 22% based on studies performed in the Town. This would leave the peninsula with an estimated volume of fresh water in storage as 1 ,000 million gallons . -4- In an ideal hydrologic system, discharge equals recharge plus or minu changes in ground water storage . Pumpage could be allowed to approach the daily recharge from precipitation . However, withdrawal must be kept lower than this amount to minimize demand on storage . On the basis of conditions , withdrawal should not exceed 30% of annual recharge Annual recharge = 160 mg - 0.44 mg/day 30% Annual recharge a 0.132 mg/D = Allowable Withdrawal Assuming Use of 100 gal/capita/day 132000 GPMGD 1320 People 00 CD Assuming 3. 7 Persons Per Home 1320 = 356 Homes . Theroetically there is sufficient water available based on 1963 data to support 350 homes , however, several factors must be incorporated into any allowable density in this area . These include salt water intrusion and water quality. Salt Water Intrusion : Fresh water generally has a chloride concen- tration of less than 40 mg/1 . The concentration within the zone of diffusion varies from 40 to 1800 mg/l . The underlying body of salty ground water has a chloride concentration of 1600 to 18 ,000 ppm. Intrusion occurs when pumpage near the interface draws the salty water upward (Fig. 5) . High tides and wave action can inundate the fresh water lens by downward movement. Dredging also causes the inward move- ment of the interface. In a USGS report (1963) four shoreline wells had chloride concentration ranging from 103 to 1600 ppm . Drinking Water Standards states a recommended limit of 250 mg/1 . These wells were within 500 ' of the shoreline. Water Quality : On August 26, 1970, this Unit sampled sixteen wells for partial chemical analysis . The analysis included ammonia , nitrates , -5- detergents , chlorides , iron and pH. Additional samples were taken on March 2 , 1971 . One home was sampled on both occasions to determine seasonal variations . No variation was found . Nitrates find there way into water supplies from the decomposition of organic nitrogen and ammonia , both of which are present in household sewage . Lawn and garden fertilizers are also a source of nitrates . Maximum permissible levels of 10 mg/l nitrate nitrogen has been set due to serious and occasionally fatal poisioning of infants ingesting waters containing nitrates . Detergents have their orgin specifically from the household waste disposal system and therefore a good indicator that sewage wastes are entering an individual water supply . The recommended limit for deter- gents is 0 . 5 mg or MEAS . Chlorides are a dual indicator. High concentrations can be used to indicate salt water intrusion while lower values show either• domestic sewage pollution and/or salt water intrusion . The Drinking Water Standard for chlorides is 250 mg/1 . Iron concentrations in excess of the recommended Drinking Water Standards is an esthetic problem causing discoloration , taste , and clothes and fixture staining . PH is 14 point range indicating the acidity or alkalinity of the water with a value of 7 being neutral . 0-7 indicates a acidic condition -6- Samples - 20 Determination Chlorides 20 Nitrate 13 Iron 13 Detergent 13 Ammonia 13 pH 20 Constitutent Range % Of Samples Within Range MBAS * 0.1 mg/l 95 0.1 -0. 5 5 Chloride 0-20 20 .0 20-40 30 .0 40-250 50 .0 250 or greater 0 100.0 Nitrate 0-7 95 7-10 0 10 or greater 5 Iron 0-0. 3 77 0. 3 or greater 23 * indicates less than Only one shallow well appeared to be receiving deirect cesspool leach- ings . There was no evidence of detergent in the aquifer except in the aforementioned case. Fifty percent of the wells sampled showed varying degrees of salt water intrusion. The chloride concentrations indicating possible intrusion were not found in a specific geographical area although the higher concentrations were found in the areas closer to the salt water bodies except for the east bluff. It is obvious that there is a tenuous balance in the area between the salt and fresh water. Certainly any large withdrawals will have drastic effects . The one case of nitrate concentration exceeding standards was caused by cesspool leaching. The generally low concentrations can be attributed to seasonal population -7- fluctuation and the saml1 percentage of land receiving fertilizers . The iron concentrations in excess of standards were probably caused by well inactivity , plumbing or the well casings . Conclusions I . Nassau Point has a limited quantity of fresh water in under- ground storage due to the salt water of the Bay ' s existing below the peninsula . 2 . The only source of replenishment of the fresh ground water is by natural precipitation of which only about one half finds it way into the water table by the inflitration process . 3 . Chemical analyses (chlorides ) indicated that salt water intrusion is evident in 50% of the wells surveyed while an additional 30% had chloride levels in which differentiation between salt intrusion and cesspool pollution could not be actually determined . Eighty percent of the homes are thus experiencing chloride levels in their water supply greater than normal accepted ground water concentrations although none exceeded drinking water standards . 4 . The rate of salt water intrusion cannot be accurately es- tablished but the rate will be a function of development , Population growth , ground water withdrawal and the amount of natural precipitation . Another drought with the resultant lowering of the ground water table will further aggrevate the fresh salt water balance and increase the rate of ground water deterioration , -8• Recommendations 1 . Establish low density zoning in the area . 2 . Prevent any dredging of the shoreline 3. If the condition of the ground water shows deterioation , a central water supply for the peninsula should be established to provide management of the resource. Controlled move- ment of the salt water interface could thus be achieved . 4 . The feasibility of connecting to a central mainland public supply shoulc be studied . Prepared by : James Heil , P . E. Water Quality Section i MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED SUBDIVISION NASSAU POINT - CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. SCTM 1000-118-6-1 AND 3. 1 {^-fs I, George Burrell, together with my family, am the owner of Lots 94, 96, 97, 98 and part of 93, immediately to the north of the proposed subdivision. We oppose this proposed subdivision. In addition we are the owners of Lots 95 and 100 which are contiguous to the lots enumerated above. We submit that the sketch submitted for determination and approval is both inaccurate and incomplete. While the applicants refer to both the "Proposed Subdivision Sec. B, Nassau Point Club Properties Map No. 745 filed October 1919" and "Amended Map A of Nassau Point Map No. 156 filed Aug. 16, 1922 in the Suffolk County Clerk' s Office" as their basis and background for the proposed subdivision, reference to those sources shows that the parcel the applicants are attempting to subdivide is already the result of a subdivision--a fact which the applicants have failed to disclose on their sketch. For example, the source subdivision maps of 1919 and 1922 disclose one ( 1 ) plot, referred to as the "Aborn" property. There was a 200 foot section on the southern part of the "Aborn" plot that was divided into two lots and later consolidated by the purchase of both lots by Trombone. There was a further subdivision of the remainder by selling a lot to Alexander (now the Hurley property) and a sale of one half of Lot 93 in 1950 . There already exist four homes on the original plot as shown on Map No. 156, the amended subdivision map of 1922 which is still valid. In fact, this map is submitted by the Aquebogue Abstract Company, agent of tae applicants. Thera certainly are four tax lots. (Lots 1 , 2, 3. 1 and 5. 1 ) . Even the proposed subdivision sketch shows 6 different lots since one must necessarily include the Hurley house. The present proposal is thus not a "minor subdivision" but rather a fragmented subdivision with an implication that there may be more to come. There is a fundamental contradiction between the applicants' deed and their plan which would grant them land to which their deed does not give them title. The proposed subdivision map sets forth as one of its northern dimensions a line as "143. 03" feet. But the deed to the present owner sets forth that line as being "120" feet from the high water mark. No explanation is given for the applicants' assertion of a claim to land to which they have no deed or other conveyance. Regardless of the point from which the 120 feet is measured, the plan is inconsistent with the deed. AUG 2 9 1990 �f previous subdivision of the "Aborn" plot. The Planning Board' s attention is directed to this traffic situation, for which no provision has been made in the application submitted. Evidently the applicants also intend to further burden the existing facility at the expense of those who have vested rights. Even more serious is the abuse of natural elements by the applicants. It is an established and known fact that the water source on Nassau Point is precarious, and the ability of the shallow and limited subsurface to absorb and filter waste is being strained. In this regard, should other Nassau Point residents and owners of already subdivided lots wish to build homes for themselves or their children, their ability to do so would be jeopardized and impaired by the fact that those resources are at a breaking point. It is very likely that their current right to build, based on the existing configuration of their lots, could be defeated in the future if the Planning Board allows a greater burden to be imposed on existing resources by granting the applicants ' proposal for development of this area. The creation of additional lots, and the addition of more homes as contemplated by this application, could not have been foreseen by those who purchased previously in reliance on the Nassau Point Club Properties Subdivision Maps. The Nassau Point Property Owners Association has submitted to the Planning Board an official report indicating a limit to the number of houses which the Nassau Point environment can support. That number already has been exceeded. Moreover, no thought has been given to the potential erosion resulting from the massive clearing of trees and vegetation, nor to the effects on the wildlife dependent on these resources, particularly in view of Nassau Point' s designation as a bird sanctuary. We note from the Nassau Point Club Properties Subdivision Plan (Maps Nos. 745 and 156 ) that all the designated lots are divided by straight lines and natural lines. The sketch submitted with the application shows a tortured and convoluted dissection of the remainder of the original "Aborn" lot with the evident intention of defeating the intent and purpose of the original plan for Nassau Point. The applicants' proposed plan is a tortured maze or puzzle, which would make it impossible to delineate lines of ownership without fences which could despoil the natural beauty and contour of the area. For example, in an attempt to gain acreage, the plan sets forth at right angles a 25 foot passage more than 350 feet long as part of a proposed lot which includes wetlands and the pond. More significantly, to reach the minimum acreage, the applicants have allocated all the beach area to a single lot and have used the 143. 03 foot measurement to which their deed does not give them title ! In addition, as far -as this writer knows, if that proposed lot were not "grandfathered" it could not be built upon at all because it is within the wetlands -3- area, and if placed elsewhere in a logical configuration, probably could not meet the offsets required. We believe that these and other matters set forth are proper considerations for the Planning Board in making its decision. We believe the Planning Board also should consider that the Town of Southold (and Nassau Point is within the Town of Southold) has two acre zoning. If all that the Planning Board does is add and multiply the number of feet involved, place the resulting geometric or mathmatical grid over the Nassau Point Club Properties original Subdivision Plan, and then affix its rubber stamp, then we submit that their tasks could be done very efficiently by a secretary or other person who has no discretion to make decisions. It is our contention that the Planning Board has wide discretion to make decisions based upon the rights of all owners in the community, and not to enrich speculators whose intention evidently is to exploit the area, as shown by their immediate unauthorized spoliation without first obtaining permits or waivers, necessitating repeated warning by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold ordering them to cease and desist. Of course this spoliation evidently was to enable the applicants to display these as yet unapproved lots to potential buyers. In fact they have staged an "open house" , complete with balloons, within the past few weeks. We believe the Planning Board has a real responsibility to the present Nassau Point residents, whose participation as residents has been induced by the official, publicly filed and approved subdivision maps. Those maps indicated the desirability of making a home in this particular area, and it would be expected that any community planning board would explore, beyond meaningless hard and fast lines, their responsibility to ensure that those who have acquired vested rights--and done so after full investigation-- are protected, and to make certain that those vested rights are not infringed upon and overburdened. Dated: August 25, 1990 R ctfull u itted, EORGE B LL Further objection to the proposed subdivision is also made by Dr. and Mrs. Andrew Grimes who own Lot No. 99 on the Nassau Point Club Properties Subdivision Haps, and occupy the home located thereon. Their property is immediately north of the proposed subdivision, and is separated therefrom only by Aborn Lane. I have been requested to record their objection to the pro sed Hohn subdivision. -4- P. S. If the Planning Board can consider consider the impact of the development on the environmental aspects of this area it might be important for a board member or environmental representative to have a personal view of the resources present. The pond and stream feeding it are alive with shellfish and crabs. Together with the Lagoon into which they flow, they are a breeding ground for other fish and aquatic creatures who inhabit the surrounding marshes. It appears obvious that additional sewage and household discharges could adversely affect the ecology of the aquatic environment. Nassau Point is a bird sanctuary. Osprey have returned to the nests nearby after an absence of many years. Egrets and exotic species of heron are often seen feeding at the edge of the pond. The red foxes, formerly a part of the woodland population serving a useful purpose have disappeared, as have the occasional deer. Monarch butterflies, by the hundreds occasionally settle on the trees and foliage in their migrations, and the pond is a sanctuary for migratory ducks and geese. Swans and their cygnets can be seen parading and feeding in the pond, stream and Lagoon. It is a unique natural area which could change drastically with conversion to a typical suburban environment. If these facts cannot be considered by the Planning Board, they should be brought to the attention of the proper environmental officials for their input before a final decision is made in connection with the proposed development. There certainly will not be an incentive to continue to hold back from development the additional undeveloped adjoining lots which have been withheld from sale to preserve the unique character of the natural growth and vegetation. -5- OgUfMS TRUSTEES ria '1 = SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President . �a0 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John L. Bednoski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 John B. Tuthill BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 August 16, 1990 CERTIFIED MAILED Harry G. Hohn New York Life Insurance 51 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10010 RE: SCTM #1000-118-6-1, 3 . 1 Dear Mr. Hohn: As seen on inspections by a representative of the Trustee office on July 23, 1990 and other inquiries, some eye view vegetation clearing seems to have taken place with in 75' of the water on Lot #3; any further activity in the area without first obtaining a permit or waiver from this office may result in a violation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, ohn M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees AUG 17 1990 JMB: jmt Enc. CC: Planning Board Bay Constable William W. Esseks, Esq. C.A.C. i\ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman s! _ �� ✓ ., Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. '•n ,,/ .: 3 ii Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald ` P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938; TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 14, 1990 William W. Esseks Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision for Harry G. & Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1 & 3 . 1 Dear Mr. Esseks: Enclosed is a copy of the July 24, 1990 report from the Board of Trustees. Please advise your client of the contents of this report. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, /f Bennett Orlowski, Jr.✓✓/ ry"5 Chairman enc. TRUSTEES ) i ' SCOTT L. HARRIS e,y' John M. Bredemeyer, III, President ✓" y ' . Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President �J ,1 �, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski, Jr. tyyi -�� P.O. Box 1179 John L. Bednoski, Jr. - John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO: Planning Board FROM: Board of Trustees DATE: July 24, 1990 RE: Harry G. and Janet Hohn SCTM #1000-118-6-1, 3 .1 This office has reviewed the determination of the CAC and agrees that the wetland line as flagged by the surveyor on January 23, 1990 is acceptable. Since the proposed map shows a 15' right-of-way along the pond the applicant should be advised that any activity within 75' of the wetlands as delineated will require a permit from this office. As seen on inspection on July 23 , 1990, moderate slopes exist immediately adjacent to the wetland area. As a result of this it is likely that only a catwalk assembly would be acceptable as a means of access to the beach. Whereas some eye view vegetation clearing seems to have taken place within 751 of the water on Lot #3 ; the applicant should be advised in writing against any further activity in the area without first obtaining a permit or waiver from this office. Thank you for the opportunity to review this map. cc: CAC µr r o z Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Telephone P.O. Box 1179 � (516) 765-1801 001 L Ot' Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Planning Board From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council # Dated: July 5, 1990 �S <; I Re: Harry G. and Janet Hohn 10,, SCTM# 1000-118-6-1, 3. 1 The Conservation Advisory Council makes the following recommendation: The site appears to have no wetlands involved. The wetlands sited on the map appear to correct. Map dated 4-12-90 nX Wetland appear to be involved. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Southold Town Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary. The survey is not correct. Wetlands need to be staked by the Southold Town Trustees. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary Additional Comments: cc: Southold Town Board of Trustees aU FUIA,,. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road c r rn SCOTT L. HARRIS =i P.O. Box 1179 y rad Supervisor Southold, New York '���� ,��� Fax (516)765-1823 11971 41j1 `A Telephone(516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: John Bredemeyer, President, Board of Trustees �! APR 1. 21990 , FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. B��'�✓S Chairman "'�-- T01AIN Cr- en, DATE: April 11, 1990 RE: Minor Subdivision Proposal for Harry G. & Janet Hohn Nassau Point SCTM# 1000-118-6-1 & 3.1 Enclosed please find a Map for the above mentioned subdivision proposal The wetland. lines have been delineated bot on the map and in the field by the is surveyor. anning Board requests your Board' s comments as to the accuracy of the delineation. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Encl. M PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ?• SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman -��!� �� ✓" � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward i Town IIaII, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938_ TOWN OF SOUT 4OLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 14, 1990 William W. Esseks Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision for Harry G. & Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1 & 3 . 1 Dear Mr. Esseks: Enclosed is a copy of the July 24, 1990 report from the Board of Trustees. Please advise your client of the contents of this report. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski," Jr. 5 Chairman enc. TRUSTEES SCOTT L. HARRIS s +^ John M. Bredemeyer, III, President �J, "~ Supervisor Henry P.Albert J. Krupski, Jr.Smith, Vice President Albe �+ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road John L. Bednoski, Jr. P.O- Box 1179 John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 f BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax(516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone(516) 765-1800 TO: Planning Board FROM: Board of Trustees DATE: July 24, 1990 RE: Harry G. and Janet Hohn SCTM #1000-118-6-1, 3 .1 This office has reviewed the determination of the CAC and agrees that the wetland line as flagged by the surveyor on January 23, 1990 is acceptable. Since the proposed map shows a 15 ' right-of-way along the pond the applicant should be advised that any activity within 75 ' of the wetlands as delineated will require a permit from this office. As seen on inspection on July 23, 1990, moderate slopes exist immediately adjacent to the wetland area. As a result of this it is likely that only a catwalk assembly would be acceptable as a means of access to the beach. Whereas some eye view vegetation clearing seems to have taken Place within 75' of the water on Lot #3; the applicant should be advised in writing against any further activity in the area without first obtaining a permit or waiver from this office. Thank you for the opportunity to review this map. cc: CAC 1.-16-21"187)-7c - SEAR 617.21 Appendix A 13 I �� State Environmental Quality Review AM FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TOW Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in aw-ofderfy manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions MINOR SUBDIVISION OF HARRY G. & JANET HOHN Name of Action Planning Board, Town of Southold Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signatureof Preparer(If differentfrom responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Minor Subdivision of Harry G. S Janet Hohn LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address,Municipality and County) Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, Suffolk County, New York NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Harry G. E Janet Hohn (212) 576 - 5077 ADDRESS New York Life Insurance Co. , 51 Madison Avenue CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE New York I NY 10010 NAME OF OV4NER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Eda McKnight Kolbe t 1 ADDRESS _ 631 Bentley Drive CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Naples FL 33963 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivision of a 7.368 acre parcel into four (4) single-family residential lots. Two of the three proposed waterfront lots contain existing dwellings. There is a bulkhead along the unimproved waterfront parcel's frontage on Great PecOnic Bay. The fourth lot is upland. Individual wells and sanitary systems are proposed. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ■Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 7.368 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested 4.66 acres _3.69 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) •1 acres • 1 acres Water Surface Area •87 acres •87 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) earth drives/beach .86 acres .86 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces •12 acres .72 acres Other (Indicate type)_ landscaped areas .76 acres 1 . 13 acres 3 What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Plymouth loamy sand: Riverhead sandy loam & beach a. Soil drainage: ■Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained ____ % of site b If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS I:and Classification System? N/-A _ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes ■No a. What is depth to bedrock? ---,--(in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage or proposed projec e with slopes: 00-10% 75 % 010-15% 15 % 015% or greater 10 % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Eyes ENO 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listedon the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ENO 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-31 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Eyes ❑No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes ENO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes ONO According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ■Yes ❑No Describe A bluff and beach exist along portions of the property's frontage on Great Peconic Bay 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes ENO If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes ONO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Unnamed tidal pond E creek a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Great Peconic Bay 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Great Peconic Bay b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Eyes []No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Eyes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Eyes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes ENO 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Eyes ONO 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes ENO B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 7.368 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 7.368 acres initially; 7.368 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped none acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 12 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 4 Ultimately 4 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 35 height; unknownwidth;unknown length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 330 ft. 3 2. How much natural, material (ie.. rock, earth, Ctc.) will be removed from the site?indeterminatq-,,;/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ayes C I:]No []N/A a. If yes, for what intend purpose is the site being reclaimed? Landscaped areas around dwellings b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ■Yes DNo C. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ■Yes ONo 4. flow many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? •97 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years of") or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes/. ■No 6, If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 12 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N/A r a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 - month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year, d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ❑No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ■No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction - None ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project None_. .f 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes UNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ■No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ■Yes t.+❑No Type Household sanitary, wastes 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ■No Explain _ 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ■Yes ONo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ■Yes ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month 1 •4 _ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ■Yes 0 N c. If yes, give name Southold Municipal Landfill ; location Cutehogue d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes MNo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ■No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Oyes ■No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes ■No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Oyes MNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ■Yes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) _ Electricity_ fossil fuels 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23 Total anticipated water usage per day 1200 gallons/day. 24, foes project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes ■No If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: • Submittal Type Date City, Town, Vi'lage 3oard C'Yes ENo Eity, Town, e Planning Board Eyes =No subdivision 2/6/90 City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes []No Eitq, County Health Department Eyes ❑N o wells & sanitary Other Local Agencies (Suffolk Cnty ■Yes ❑No subdivision Planning Commission) Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑No State Agencies (NYSDEC) Eyes 7—No Tidal Wetlands Permit Federal Agencies Eyes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ■Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: —zoning amendment ❑zoning variance Especial use permit ■subdivision ❑site plan ❑mewlrevision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? It may be possible to create an add'l lot given present zonin restrictions. (However, thea lican is not interested in pursuin that alternative. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Eyes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/. mile radius of proposed action? R-40• single-family residential 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a Y. mile? ■Yes 0 N 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 1 .127 acres 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Eyes ■No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Eyes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Eyes []No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Eyes RNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Eyes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Harry G. Hohn by William W. Esseks Date August 10. 199 Signature WAL4, W 1;'2�- 'F" A4f Title Contract Vendee If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 art 2---PROJECT IMPACTS AND . HEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it he looked at further • 1 he Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples, and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects Instructions (Read carefully) 1 a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? LINO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No ,:)foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No 0 Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Fxcavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ EJ Yes El No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2 Will there be an effect tr ...ry unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO ❑YES • Specific land forms. _ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) :]NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: _ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ I]Yes ❑No 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ []Yes []No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveved off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No existing body of water to .:,e extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ [I Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ u [--]Yes []No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: _ ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ❑NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Propos=d Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 7 1 2 3 ' Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? LINO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: _ ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8, Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ [1 Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ❑NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action woufch substantially interfere with any resident or EJ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ []Yes 1:1 No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ []Yes El No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm _ ,field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [--]No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO EYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum In Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ []Yes []No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ENO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ _Yes []No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO EYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ Eyes []No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ Eyes Ll No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes F-1 No 9 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ❑NO f JYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • (;lasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day) ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No substances(i e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc ) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ EJ Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑NO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste • Other impacts: _-_- -- -_ -- --------...----.--___.-_— (7 ❑ ❑Yes El No 10 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change uNO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than S%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No will increase by more than S% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes []No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ Eyes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ❑NO []YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 617.21 SEAR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-'/4 1/4-1/2 1/2.3 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑, ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(i.e., screened by summer,foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes ❑No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes [:]No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *'/a mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *1/2 mile ❑Yes ❑No *1 miles El Yes ❑No *2 miles ❑Yes ❑No *3 miles ❑Yes ❑No " Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Deily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ VOL/( ��� M,5 TRUSTEES SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, I11, President �0 �Q� Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO: Planning Board FROM: Board of Trustees DATE: July 24, 1990 RE: Harry G. and Janet Hohn SCTM #1000-118-6-1, 3 . 1 This office has reviewed the determination of the CAC and agrees that the wetland line as flagged by the surveyor on January 23, 1990 is acceptable. Since the proposed map shows a 15' right-of-way along the pond the applicant should be advised that any activity within 75, of the wetlands as delineated will require a permit from this office. As seen on inspection on July 23, 1990, moderate slopes exist immediately adjacent to the wetland area. As a result of this it is likely that only a catwalk assembly would be acceptable as a means of access to the beach. Whereas some eye view vegetation clearing seems to have taken place within 75' of the water on Lot #3 ; the applicant should be advised in writing against any further activity in the area without first obtaining a permit or waiver from this office. Thank you for the opportunity to review this map. cc: CAC L � • c fF0(�-�pG Town Hall, 53095 Main Road N Telephone P.O. Box 1179 '?� '� � (516) 765-1801 OHO! �t Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Planning Board From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council �< Dated: July 5, 1990I� I 4 ' Re: Harry G. and Janet Hohn lift ;1 .. :1 SCTM# 1000-118-6-1, 3. 1 The Conservation Advisory Council makes the following recommendation: The site appears to have no wetlands involved. The wetlands sited on the map appear to correct. Map dated 4-12-90 Wetland appear to be involved. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Southold Town Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary. ElThe survey is not correct. Wetlands need to be staked by the Southold Town Trustees. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary Additional Comments: cc: Southold Town Board of Trustees �o UEF!)(l�,oGy t_ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 .Y -@! .-,. - � Supervisor Southold, New York O� .aZK- Fax (516)765-1823 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 77 TO: John Bredemeyer, President, Board of Trustees 7 APR i. 2 1990 FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman �7 U —'_—�---- - TOWN CFSOJe DATE: April 11, 1990 RE: Minor Subdivision Proposal for Harry G. & Janet Hohn Nassau Point SCTM# 1000-118-6-1 & 3.1 Enclosed please find ajMap for the above mentioned subdivision proposal he wetland. lines have been delineated bo on the map and in the field by the a ` s surveyor. anning Board reques s your Board' s comments as to the accuracy of the delineation. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Encl. L Og�FFfnII L' ef'uE E= 'r Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Telephone Ln� ® � P.O. Box 1179 (516) 765-1801 �A, Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Planning Board From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Dated: July 5, 1990 Re: Harry G. and Janet Hohn SCTM# 1000-118-6-1, 3. 1 The Conservation Advisory Council makes the following recommendation: The site appears to have no wetlands involved. The wetlands sited on the map appear to correct. Map dated 4-12-90 aWetland appear to be involved. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Southold Town Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary. The survey is not correct. Wetlands need to be staked by the Southold Town Trustees. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary Additional Comments: JUL _ 6 ic•r'J sal cc: Southold Town Board of Trustees �oS�EFOIK�OG� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road v r=t+ SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 y ' Supervisor Southold, New York Fax (516) 765-1823 11971 �� t Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD r TO: John Bredemeyer, President, Board of Trustees AR1. 2 1M FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. spry✓%5 Chairman ` --- TOWN Cf- SOUT DATE: April 11, 1990 RE: Minor Subdivision Proposal for Harry G. & Janet Hohn Nassau Point SCTM## 1000-118-6-1 & 3. 1 Enclosed please find for the above mentioned subdivision proposal The wetland. lines have been delineated bo on the map and in the field by the ' s surveyor. anning Board reques s your Board' s comments as to the accuracy of the delineation. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Encl. S�8Fi tE M5 550 Aborn Lane, Box 74B Nassau Point. Cutchogue, N . Y. 11935 (516) 723-5678 Hay 25, 1990 Re: Proposed subdivision - Nassau Point by Harry G. & Janet Hohn Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 Attention: Melissa A. Spiro, Assistant Planner Dear Planning Board Members: We protest and object to the application by Harry G. and Janet Hohn for the subdivision of lands conveyed or about to be conveyed to these applicants. That proposed subdivision contemplates the use by others of portions of land owned by the undersigned since 1974. The specific area is an alleged 15 foot path which was conveyed to ■y predecessor in interest in 1949, as shown by a copy of the enclosed deed (Exhibit 1 - Deed dated 2/25/49 from Nassau Club Properties Inc. to Charles Hamer recorded 8/19/49, Liber 2983 Page 57) . Beatrice Judge, a former Justice of the Supreme Court, affirmed by affidavit that the particular 15 foot path included in the conveyance to us was owned exclusively, and it was so insured by the Title Guarantee Company. (Copy of the Beatrice Judge affidavit is enclosed as Exhibit 2. ) At the time of the conveyance to us, and since, there was no visible evidence of any path in existence, and certainly there was no use by any person. This state has existed since at least 1951. We submit a copy of our survey which was guaranteed to us by the Title Guarantee Company. (Exhibit 3) As is evident there are various discrepancies between this survey and the survey submitted by Hr. and Mrs. Hohn. However, our survey is amply supported by the descriptions set forth in our deeds, and it is acknowledged that we are the record owners of the 15 foot wide strip designated previously as "Parcel D" on which we have paid taxes annually since our acquisition in 1974. There are other considerations for objections to this subdivision. At the present time, and for all the time set forth, there has not been any use, of this land as a "path" and indeed such use would be physically impossible since such parcel is Town of Southold Planning Board Nay 25, 1990 - 2 - completely overgrown with trees, poison ivy and other wild vegetation in common with, and indistinguishable from, the surrounding area. There is no bridge or device by which the intervening stream which intersects the area can be crossed. The property proposed for subdivision has its own path to over 500 feet of beachfront without the necessity of crossing the stream or building a bridge in a wetlands area. The burden engendered by opening the 15 foot strip for purposes of subdivision would be excessive. The applicants here are attempting to burden our property with the consequences of their own desires for subdivision and development in an environmentally sensitive, undeveloped natural and wetlands area. The physical aspects would also be dangerous and could without any fault on our part subject us to liability. The proposed subdivision imposes excessive and undue burdens on our property rights. For this, and other reasons, we anticipate instituting legal action to defend our title and protect the natural state and character of the property. We respectfully request, therefore, that the application for subdivision be denied. z7r ctfully itte E B LL and I jlg BURR&LL Encl. (3) Deed Affidavit Survey fr HADD. u ea.N l JYLIOt eLU INC..LAW BL.�NK PUBLISHER I 2r DI)NUOD. 71 BROA �•ND 1 REGION BT..NEW YORK Y LIM2933 w 57 t5 � n Made the 25th day of February , nineteen hundred and forty-nine ettveeit NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES INC. , a corporation organized under the laws of State of New York , having its_'principal place of business at 25 Monroe Place, Brooklyn, New York party of the first part, and CHARLES HAMMER, residing at 11 Brixton Road, Garden City, New York, part y of the second part, (tMjS!9 b, that the party of the first part,in consideatjozW--------------------- -----------------------Ten Dollars-------------------------------------- Dollars, lawful money of tha United Statess, and other good; and valuable consideration _ pald by the party of the second part, does hereby remise, release and quitclaim unto the party of the second part, his heirs and assigns forever ALL that plot of land situate , lying and being in Nassau Point (formerly Hog Neck) in the Town of Southhold, County of Suffolk Stat New York, bounded and described aspfollows : that strip of land 15 feet in width beginning at high water mark of Great Peconic Bay between lot number 94 and lot numbere93 as shown on a map entitled , "Amended Map A"etc. and extending in an irregular curved line in a general easterly direction along lots numbers 94, 96 and 97 on the north and lot 93 and a certain pond on the south, a total length of about 470 feet to the southerly line of Aborn I Lane. Saidi Map being more particularly described as follows : „ 'Amended Map A of Nassau Point owned by Nassau Point Club properties , Inc' date June 28th, 1924 and file in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office , August i 16th, 1922 in File No. 156. i I I I I ) { t 1}1 4'r STATE 01 tet' 7L�7 ) z n IC„S ._. JUDu „, beim duly sworn, deposes and says: T'lat she resi.'.cs at 460 51st Street, ,Brpgklyn,'. L TNew Yori_c and st; tes t''-:e following in conjunction, with the p ;,t right tile and interest of certain real property, owned by 4 ,y f CHARLES HUi ,ell, Decedent a.nd particularly described,'on a certain ri<:,P Prepared b• License(; Surveyor, O.C . VAIiTU] - on July 29th, 1-922 wherein a particular strip of lana 15 foot } wide, cor:�:ler.cin on .born Lane thence westerly between lots �• t• ryS 97, 96, 93 anC.S94 > earl n at Great Peconic Bay "rtes the SI property owned e...,lus9veijJ by the said Decedent, CI-tm,Z;S, H,A1^'"'TMI that th4.s land has revo-r been used by the general '• r purblic nor by any of 't1.e other property owners at Nassau Point. `1i,, the basis of the deponent 's knowledge is hex own personal o';servation and communications with the ',Beo@dent �. before he died cdnce=4 n-; the uses of the said property and: 'the enjoyment t1_orof. Deponent visited the property on many' different occasions, that she had been the general" 'sel for "the Decedent and can unequivocally state that ixa;onehas - ti used the narticular strip of property since the time that ,the 3 decedent and/or h; s spouse first purchased same, which was t'M 4 prior to 1951 unt-iT the t5.;::e of his death: That thereafter the said Docer,cr_t 's estate !,as not permitted the usd' of the ) said 15 foot strip to any other person. . Sworn to befog -.e this , Clair ofAr9 '' 3U V n-. ♦i � ��t I/.''__' t �! SUGGJ - Jr. ,UYLIC,Slab d Naw York cow :VO � I�(ti1oY KYr�YA 1',� c , Aa ,y, .v1F ,w, *rr_ ���yf;�.f i T �A�t n Fb''H"a.§.,:GG`tik 3 ,f��s.nr. ♦ :� .d!'�e .Y ut„kT'`'^'� 'VRAM Pw �8 �Ogetber with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises. TO babe anb tO b0lb the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, his heirs and assigns forever, I i ' I I 3n Mitnva; Wbered, the party of the first part has caused its corporate seal to be hereunto a&ixed,and these presents to be signed by its duly authorized officer the day and year first above written. NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES INC B ..............i!/�.,ll �H ti. v P r e i e tk LEM29M P,f 59 Otah of NEW YORK 1Countp of KINGS i On the 25th day of February , nineteen hundred and forty—nine before me came. WALTER L. JOHNSON I to me known, who, - ._„ 'ng by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides in 25 Monroe Place a Brooklyn, New York t_ -he fsthe President of Nassau Point Club Properties Inc ` e corporatiog described in, and which executed, the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of d corporation,that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by der of the board of— directors of said corporation;and that be signed his name ereto-by,like,order. _ asti fir. BEATRICE M. JUDGE NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF NEW YORK RESIDINGIN KINGSCOUNTY KINGS CO.CLKS.NO.70,REG.N0.33-J-0 COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 30,1950 Ir T. t d Reserve this apace for ase of Recording 08ica --- i - ,� y NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES „ INC. r ` 5 to C ; • 10 I P u , ,, n CHARLES HAMMER riijN Dated, _......_................................... 1 1 The land a$e ted by the within instru- ment lies in or4-ot"k Q 2; rn v Record and return to JUDGE & COLLINS i% 189 Montague Street Brooklyn, N. Y Ili I 'v��' John J. Raynor, P.E. & L.S., p.c. Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor Deerfield Green P.O. Box 720 Reports Montauk Highway Water Mill, New York 11976 Design Phone: (516) 726-7600 Environmental Planning May 9, 1990 Ms. Melissa Spiro Southold Town Planning Board P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Harry G. &Janet Hohn, Nassau Point Dear Ms. Spiro: I am enclosing a print of map of our survey of the property being acquired by Mr.& Mrs. Hohn on Nassau Point, and also a written description which we have prepared from our survey. It is my understanding that a question was raised by you or someone else in the Planning Board as to the relationship of our map to deeds which you either have or have seen. Our survey is the result of analysis of all of the deeds available in the area and field work to remeasure all of the lines and to locate the buildings and other features. The description that I enclose represents the assembly of each of those old deeds and is, in my opinion, a proper representation of the land that is being submitted for subdivision approval. I hope this is of sufficient assistance to answer your questions, and I encourage you to call either myself or Richard Van de Kieft of my office at your earliest convenience If there is something further that you think would be helpful. Very truly yourqq- s,,( U w John J. Raynor, P.E., L.S. JJR:sga Enclosures pc: Harry Hohn William W. Esseks, Esq. )i ''11 l f^ MAY 1 01990 C 3 Description of all that certain plot, piece, or parcel of land situate, lying, and being in the hamlet of Nassau Point, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, and State of New York more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of the parcel about to be described, said point being the point formed by the intersection of the southeasterly line of Aborn Lane and the southwesterly line of Nassau Point Road; running thence from said point of beginning southerly along the southwesterly side of Nassau Point Road, along the arc of an irregular curve to the right having a tie line of South 040 05' 15" West, 222.71 feet to a point and lands now or formerly of Richard and Christopher Hurley; thence along last mentioned lands the following three (3) courses and distances: 1) South 540 42' 00" West , 200.00 feet to a point; 2) South 090 48' 00" West, 120.00 feet to a point; 3) North 540 42' 00" East, 200.00 feet to a point on the southwesterly line of Nassau Point Road; thence southerly along the southwesterly line of Nassau Point Road on an irregular curve to the left having a tie line of South 120 22' 10" East, 100.37 feet to a point and lands now or formerly of Mario and Ilse Trombone; thence South 540 43' 00" West along last mentioned lands, 714.68 feet to the average high water of Great Peconic Bay as of December 13, 1989; thence along tie lines marking the average high water of said bay as it winds and turns the following four (4) courses and distances: 1) North 370 19' 15" West, 67.74 feet to a point; 2) North 400 59' 50" West, 205.42 feet to a point; 3) North 450 02' 09" West, 127.84 feet to a point; 4) North 470 54' 38" West, 121.21 feet to a point and landsInOw°or John J. Raynor, P.E. and L.S., P.C. formerly of Charles and Maude B. Hammer; said lands being a part of Lot 93 on subdivision map of Amended Map "A" of Nassau Point filed in the office of the Suffolk County Clerk as file number 156 on August 16, 1922 and on proposed subdivision map of Section B, Nassau Point Club Properties, Inc. filed in the office of the Suffolk county Clerk as file number 745 on October 1 , 1919; thence along last mentioned lands North 540 42' 00" East, 143.03 feet to the southwesterly line of a 15 foot Way as shown on said subdivision maps; thence southerly along the southwesterly line of a 15 foot Way as it winds and turns, 255 feet more or less to a point on the southeasterly line of Aborn Lane; thence easterly along the southeasterly line of Aborn Lane North 540 42' 00" East, 730.00 feet to a point on the southwesterly line of Nassau Point Road; said point being the point or place of beginning and comprising an area of 7.368 acres, be the same more or less. May 7, 1990 0 John J. Raynor, P.E. and L.S., P.C. o , M S Aquebogue Abstract Corp. Agent for First American Title Insurance Company of New York 123 Maple Avenue—Riverhead, New York 11901 (516)369-0200 May 1, 1990 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision for Harry G. & Janet Hohn SCTM#1000-118-6-1 & 3.1 Dear Planning Board Members: Aquebogue Abstract Corp. as agent for First American Title Insurance Company of New York, the last mentioned title insurance company being authorized to issue a title insurance policies by the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New york pursuant to Article 64 of the Insurance Law, states to you in response to your letter to John J. Raynor of April 10, 1990 as follows : 1 . We have examined the records of the County of Suffolk and more particularly as they pertain to the aforesaid parcels and, we have examined the subject minor subdivision map and we report to you that Eda McKnight Kolbe is the owner of all of the lands at Nassau Point described upon and map and she owns no other contiguous lands thereto and may pass title to said lands to Harry G. Hohn and Janet Hohn pursuant to their contracts to purchase. 2. All of said lands, are benefited with a right of way, together with others to and from Nassau Point Road over Aborn Lane. The current proposed subdivision provides for frontage of lots 2, 3 and 4 on Aborn Lane , lot 1, fronts on Nassau Point Road at this time but has the same right to use Aborn Lane as the other lots should lot lines change. The basis for said conclusion is found in deed liber 978 cp 313 and as shown on a minor subdivision sketch plan prepared for Harry G. & Janet Hohn, prepared 1/25/90 work completed 1/23/90, by John J. Raynor , PE. Lot no. 2 being an irregular shaped lot with a 25 foot frontage on Aborn Lane. Lot no. 3 having a 363.68 foot frontage on Aborn Lane. p 3 . The lands described upon said subdivision map a7 so benefitted with a separate right of way 15 feet 'in width in common with others, passing from the west end of Abgrn=-'Lade in a generally northwest direction to the highwater mark of ' Great Peconic Bay and said grant of right of way is specifically referred to in deed liber 3273 cp 273. 'yam Aquebogue Abstract Corp. Agent for First American Title Insurance Company of New York 123 Maple Avenue—Riverhead, New York 11901 (516)369-0200 4 . The deeds as recorded in liber 3166 cp 424 , 3163 cp 211, 3528 cp 529 and deed liber 5161 cp 492 are intended to cover premises as shown on survey prepared by John J. Raynor, prepared 1/25/90 work completed 1/23/90 known as Minor Subdivision Sketch Plan prepared for Harry G. 6 Janet Hohn. AQUEBOGUE ABSTRACT CORP BY: i9 ,� IL M 631 Bentley Drive Naples, FL 33963 April 30, 1990 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P 0 Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Melissa Spiro, Planner RE: Subdivision of property at Nassau Point Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-118-6-1- & 3 . 1 Dear Ms. Spiro: I am the record owner of adjoining parcels of property on Nassau Point in the Town of Southold described on the Suffolk County Tax Map as Parcel Nos . 1000- 1.18-6-1 & 3 . 1 (the "subject property" ) . Please be advised that i hereby authorize Harry G. Hohin and Janet Hohn, both residing at 200 East 66th Street, New York, New York 10021, to apply for :. subd -, ision of the subject property as my contract optionees. I further authorize the firm of John J. Raynor, P.E. & L. S. , P.C. , whose address is Deerfield Green, P O Box 720, Montauk Hi.ghwa, , Water Mill, New York 11976, and William W. Esseks, Esq. , or a member of his firm, whose address is 108 East Main Street, P O Box 279, Riverhead, New York 11901, to act as my agents on any and all application or other filings in connection with the aforesaid subdivision. Very truly yours, Eda McKnight Kolbe MAY 1 1990 HARRY G. HOHN Attorney At Law 200 East 66th Street New York, New York 10021 Office: (212) 576-5077 Home: (212) 758-255 ' April 27 , 1990 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Melissa Spiro, Planner Re: Subdivision Property At Nassau Point Suffolk County Tax Map Dear Ms. Spiro: Nos. 1000-118-6-1 & 3 . 1 We are contract optionees of Eda McKnight Kolbe for the above-referenced property. Ms. Kolbe is the record owner of the property. We are applying for a subdivision of the subject property from the Town of Southold Planning Board. Please be advised that we hereby authorize the firm of John J. Raynor, P.E. & L.S. , P.C. , whose address is Deerfield Green, P.O. Box 720, Montauk Highway, Water Mill, New York 11976, and William W. Esseks, Esq. , or a member of his firm, whose address is 108 East Main Street, P.O. Box 279, Riverhead, New York 11901, to act as our agents on any and all applications or other filings in connection with the aforesaid subdivision. Sin rely, arry ohn n L. hn MAY 1 1990 ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (516) .369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELEX-EHCA 6852318 UW P. O. BOX 570 TELECOPIER NUMBER(51 6) 369-2065 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 JANE ANN R. KRATZ (51 6) 726-6633 JOHN M. WAGNER WILLIAM POWER MALONEY ALAN D. OSHRIN April 10, 1990 OF COUNSEL The Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Melissa Re: The Application of Harry Hohn concerning the Kolbe Property Dear Sirs : In connection with the above matter, enclosed please find a copy of a letter from Aquebogue Abstract Corp. together with various enclosures. I believe that the letter and enclosures are self-explanatory. If we can be of any further help, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, William W. Esseks BCB:cab cc: John J. Raynor � 5 � .,iii L '�.•�.� .�. ::L Arninhnnvn Ahofror...f r„n.N, ,ori T 111:.,-,_,, x "h/ V0 yy ✓/IyJ".'ter}.. t i 7 V Aquebogue Abstract Corp. Agen[for First American Title Insurance Company of Nein York 123 Maple Avenue—Riverhead, New York 11901 (516) 36.9-0200 March 21 , 1990 APR 16 la William Esseks, esq. 108 E. Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: 632-S-2031 632-S-2032 Hohn Dear Mr. Esseks: The following is a more detailed itemization of the easements and roads in question regarding the above captioned property. 1. The 15 foot way running perpendicular to Aborn Lane. We have no rights over this. When George Burrell says you have no rights over a certain Right of Way he may be thinking of this one. 2 . Aborn Lane. Owners of subject premises as well as other property owners on Nassau Point have rights to use this road . Following is affirmative insurance: Policy affirmatively insures ingress and egress over the entire length of Aborn Lane to and from Nassau Point Road as shown in liber 978 cp 313 , together with others. 3. 15 foot way running in a northwesterly direction from the westerly end of Aborn Lane. Policy affirmatively insures ingress and egress in common with others over the 15 foot way as it winds in a northwesterly direction from Aborn Lane to the shore line of Great Peconic Bay. Owners of subject premises have rights over this as referred to in liber 3273 cp 273 , wherein Charles Hammer gives the owner of subject premises an easement over the 15 foot right of way which runs between lots 93 & 94 , 96 & 97 on Map of Nassau Point. (see copy and map) . continued. . . . . 3 , rM d Manhattan 113 P. f/7', Erwin moa gSsese er Yew York, and LAWRENCE M. 2I of 5 parties of the aecord part, WITNRSSETIE that the party of. K e ,r. ;,,�g. •. New JerseYr P n ,. r•r; in sonaideration of One ($1.00) dollar2,lawful money of the United St ? q r Cal and valuable considerations, paid by the, parties of the secadd part, o� r t;' acid release unto the parties of the aeound part, thalr heirs and usslgnn - ( '- _L shat certeip• piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Nass t�` o 1Itt: a Hog Neck in the town of Southold, Suffolk County, New'YoFk, bounded IW c follows;- BSJINNING at'a- etoae�ponumerlL,.N.h1C Ise ftumted at the corn+r It fP r. In ' a .rotersection of the westerly side of Nassau Road with the southerly sIcW P Ln Lane, as said road and lane are laid out on a survey of said pre)nlses made t� .• _ L ' Y, L I[alsey, Civil Engineer and Surveyor, May 1919; running thence south 54° 4 r I,, t• i ,IIn hunlred and thirty (730) feet to a point in saidlane, thence stili along t l t: L,r nide of said lane as it winds and turns to high water mark in Peconic Bay .1 h! Ir ^ "l m r ii a southerly direction and along high eater mark.of Peconic Huy eight hundre ,r, ,vi.rity une and eight one-hundredths (821.08) feat, thence nirtherly 540 43Past I( , r e^ 1:'A All a 'tore monumant to another stone monument in the westerly side of Naeeau 4� 0, 9eicl cotxse running a distance of six hundred and forty-five and ninety-eight r n of � i u.: ed.l.hs ((;'5.98) feet; thence in a northeasterly direction, along the westerly s: 4 _ _ I'.: c sr;.0 Itoad, to the Point or place of beginning;. TOGETHER with an easement overt ; n i Toad mild Aborn Lane for access and egress to and from said premiseb. TOGETIiER 9 t• a 6i g ].:. :%e right , title and Interest of the party of the first part in and to Lhe ^ .n.! i.nde;r wu'•;er in Peconic Bay, abutting said Premises. Said Bract of land contain C : . it ,ecen i.cras more or lase. SUBJECT, however, to an easement over • strip of it n: :ciehdSng fifte.an feet in width along and above high dater mark, which shall to (* . . rl r.r a cormnon roadway for the banefit 'of all persons Awning lands on said Nassatf ^ 9u: , Lneluding the grantee herein. AND the partle; of the second part, for them s. 1,191, L1•..e)r heirs and usslgna, do hereby covenant to and ,with the party of the f3; ..I i:,,, its successors and assigns, that the parts,-8 of the second part, their heirs o n! 13ss, mill not at any time erect any houses on said premises costing less than It Ihcudand Dollars ($2,000.00) each, except the ordinary outhouses. '[J#— u loregoin„ covenants, restrictions and reservations may be altered or annulled at sr L; ii.nLe L•y agreement between the party of the first part and the owner for the time "•"" e .14 if 'the premises hereby conveyed, and such agreement shall be effactdal to a1Lc r datul said covenants, restrictions or reservations without the consent of the owr "'� : !' cy/ other or adjacent promises. TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the set _ �• "'� :ii 'L!;hts o!' the party of the first part In and to said premises. .TO HAVE AND TO ` Shu )ramises herein granted unto the part Les of the second part their heirs and as.' e.:!ever, subject as aforesaid. AND the party of the as follow 1113r: That the party ofrthe first part 19 seined of the 041 0>eaisas in fee simple i M 4 � u.: hes E;ood right to convey the some. SECOND; ,That the �qJee, L p6 s, 6bad part � -0,13lquiel.ly enjoy the said premises. THIRD: That the 5WW ,-remises are free frm •iniacen. : trik ' AOURTH: That the party of the fifst part w1 1 e)tetute or procure any l I o , r i i i AV i -P + ; V O � � r O � P p r+ \ � ad 1• � ^, Mo J V H W N I w w 6 r C 9� I 10 to. I to. 1M 1 IN • IN 1. 11 IN 1 12 ' L f 1 �pIIn.il ltuic oiy wavy quo oc. r.�,,,.,,"�• .�...�. �incumbrances. - AOURTH: That the pasty of the first peat will execute or procure any TH D1 1 mt#e th 139+a day L; Ald at, 10511 f ixto BB li, b 4AN!'.-iR esiding aC 11 Road, Gal +{n Cityr�I e 1 !x! o " rqa of ! fir�lt par,t, nd I " Maybe a x1 I GBr 'r laing�et lxhqlik III Poir 0, � ' a i I � i GHf, res ding a N�s�a oint Peconic t�.i Y. L �partibs ot 'th + I + Peconic s IN.j Y.� second pirt, J � ' BITfihB or y of t P first Pjrtq opreoet a i' that he the -ow �mp�e o ri certlnin �plo land bolidded and a �! f61lows: ALL that.,'pio jqr ! R { i I r� parcel 'd .U2iQ oil a 9 a+hd bsi in Nssau Po t I w- 1 " + n sof old' County �1�Strf (forme! y. Hog No �. +� I }! . i! { i'� i rr is BLate dew `Yorkl 1� p � desc i d', as Mit {+ ALL Lha p trip of a Q+ l tt in wld itegi nini;at gh I t• water mellt of Gre t Pebo ay+ betwe lot bomber 9 ,i nd 1 t numberp as; aho ntitled Amended ]dap A Ali + 9 I i Nassau nt: owns } �IdaPdint Cl b Prbpertieq no, � I � ?� dated 28th ,9�$f fled' irk S folk "ountt k's officei �Ao�usC 16 � ��� �i�e Nd.' SG and ex endi in a l+• irregeaz1 curved Altfe �in � �noral lea terly €lirecii alo r + 93 i• � " lots ettialberr� 949 �y46 � � the no i and lot !num qty � ` `Main poiid' �t the ajt 1"length 'of. 6 I� an4 a oq ipu x 470 feet' to `the $dU,pie ne of Ab ! Lam , rthe , raps q uties a '{ p r k) ' ri i, I f • S F 1 4 I' r� �+ r � } 1' end wjrrant :that they a i owners n' fear simole Corti in ' } lots ll4pldcea or }�rele �nd.lyt ;on the soothe 'sid y� of Abori1 Lane q whXcPa c44i to en together: ,ar +cxd u I and deb ibed aa. fo to L that lot or`parcil f land situ& a lying and, Ue'i Ressao' P int (formerly aV 'Nr �r in the, 'Own of Southold unty" of 3 folkv' Btate of 'NzT !! ; . York bouhded andideacri %s follow !to wits HSGIFN�S3 q at a '06herets m n1duintI-aat.: the b„iereeoiion° of tlb south- 0 ou h— I � � r � r "• r , � � " � , I' , .I ! sl it 0 � ' I r 6. 1 " , . easterly line of Aborn Lane and the curved westerly line of "i Nassau Point Road, as shown on a map entitled "Amended I D t of g ssau Point oR�ed situate in Lown o. 80u t,,,j Nassau Poi Club Prope�'ties, Inc.% dated' June 28th 192 "R and file& In the Suffolk County Clerk's office August 1'',19: E Is, j4,2.e'°fro. '156 ; from' saidl point of beginning running Guth erly along said curved westerly line of Nassau Point Ro t . 440 feetq more or less to lam of Aborn; thence along a Ilaid Moor lands of Aborn, 8. 54e431 W."740 feet, more or less, to the + ordinary high water mark or Peoonio Bay; thence northws �erl along said ordinary high water mark of Peconio Bay, 520 at te ` «N + a concrete monument and lan4, ot Charles Hammer; thenceo ` ' land of Charles Hammer A. 5 p420a.- 120 feet, more or ls�s, N I' s� to the curved southwasterl� in4 of a 15 foot way, ae shown G on said map; thence southespltarly along said curved south+ r = 'westerly7,line of said .15 fopt;wsy 250,feet, more or lsssi, to said' southeasterly line of, born Lane; thence along sal son Ii easterly`.lins of Aborn Lanej',N* 54 4218,- 730 feet, no or v tp',.thwpoint of.beg WBBRM the ppsttes,of the second part desire — � ; to acquira ;from the party p thefirst.parte and the parte of i"' the.firet part,is willing grant to the parties ofthr .F ,' ' -second part a right of.waylpysr the said prlvatm.road or; i j -0. r� path 'of, the' party of the fIraV parte heretofore describe3 _ herein, aWl as hereinafter _;Sore particularly prov14eds Now, TfLERBFOR 'Xt,.to mutually agreed ass � tollowsf. I. That the p##allrty of the first part hereby giye ,ws . .w, T , • j + and grants to the parties o thesecondpart and to their ' l --:heirs and assigns, as an aurtenance to the land&. of the � h ; � 1 parties of the second part,jthe full and free right, ia ! ,f common, with the party of the first and the heirs and asaigas of the party of the first part, at all times hereafter , to enter +—no the agid'"private road or path from ny part Wt'- P ,rte g„ 1 W�q y S - ; f y, rit s;, , + . ''���fi 1' ,pEtrCEs ., dr ttte llaid'.{pre0lIbibs' of ,hA'�'IU I��'111k'i7 !I "f I e yr X13 % t IN E r 7CC! grid Piles Midi re1C� Over h n seR ! , #M,,�yy e. .j.e �,�, ,� .� . - . , � •� � � I �l�ibiuwl'f" } 'a • Ms , 1 r N h Ii r �e h � pg� f u � ° of thY exe ttl df tb s I anectby t do peri Lei oral r i av ;r w s I' eeodnd pe t aha l pa t htl Y art�re of �h�l;' 3'dt �a u aunt of-,lTen'�and 66ALM 10• `�bb:_lars nndl Iotbor' Tro°fan ; E t d 'C va1naD�e eoneddiralki n � It- , tero titKt yb� ��1 r s w Ye II in �f f15 t: 1 r, � ' � � r�y7 � r 1y, r. � i ('{,.ryM� � � ,Y 7 'gyp l`r Y t 4 F ! they �lttociheret nav R F r, f !!" Y m. f ± 1 hereu> ko aetAll id• art ealf l �t�Na wn�f 'Yeas;! „ u, .' abovelrritteh� a w t � 7 o1 �eI t In the Preaena ofd ;, %, s . ���- '.. • r ff $� y i r�;• F ' .�� +r�M � s ���i , f9 n Y , C .•i► µ� � I ( a - r s TT., { J� I �I�'-•,1 �y s�: � �"�� v' '� �'jyt 4p fryi I N' �� e p " k s�'>9t,[ '�•,, eM � �I '� t� r f � � �:r � I it Ka 1 ' t Nr o rIj 4s� J tE'9: 11r i A } i1 ;: r t ? t ( �� �atf ty �� �k`'•rra � � a F � Xnp � II � t 4 e' D }h f[' r n 1iF �t � r b !apt' � �" r � "� a � ruI F � a � f .5^`. � Y� r �� f sl �.. • , YlFt�AS x ,� ��, j:,� ! .Ii. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road u� T SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 y Supervisor Southold, New York O. 11971 4/fl �� Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: John Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 60?V-/V5 Chairman DATE: April 11, 1990 RE: Minor Subdivision Proposal for Harry G. & Janet Hohn Nassau Point SCTM# 1000-118-6-1 & 3. 1 Enclosed please find a map for the above mentioned subdivision proposal. The wetland. lines have been delineated both on the map and in the field by the applicant' s surveyor. The Planning Board requests your Board' s comments as to the accuracy of the delineation. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Encl. j,ec „. actual draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions should be submitted after the Planning Board has reviewed the Commission' s report. New York Life Insurance Company 51 Madison Avenue,New Yor 212 576-5077 k,NY 10010 Harry G.Hohn Chairman of the Boardy, March 28, 1991 Mr, Walter Lindley Senior Environmental Planner Suffolk County Department of Health Services Wastewater Management Section Suffolk County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 Dear Mr, Re: Harry & Janet Hohn Lindley; SCTM# 1000-118-6- SCDHS Ref. No, 90--349349 The Hearing now scheduled b 1991 on the above is ver Y your Department for Therefore, I had clearlyY Important to me and m April 11, experts, but now find becalanned to attend g family, Possible. of the along with my MeetingOn April 11, 1991 I date this is not of the Foundation for will be running the (I serve as Chairman Independent Higher Annual organization of the Board of that a Education. eeds of the 660 fpr--O bonO7 to hal the charitable member private collegesp meet financial giving, ) through coordinated ncorporate For the record, let me state what I have been accomplish over the last fifteen months governmental a attempting to Nassau Point agencies. I wish to build with various Years. to which I will retire a Year-round In order to be in that full time in a few on entire seven plus acre parcel position I had to Each of the three Lots of land now beingpurchase the acre requirements, Is substantially subdivided. which we would The vacant Lot Y over the minimum land The contiguous like to build our (Lot #1) is the Lot guous Lot with home (the test on retained by me and the Beach House well site) , would be on it would be daughters and their families including only for m grandchildren. r includin Y four married I will BY having this facility our four wonderful alone get to see our grandchildren on is worth the available, Janet and fifteen month process, regular basis. This w: s 2 - The third Lot (Lot #3) on Aborn Lane may very well also be retained within my immediate family if that is at all economically feasible. Thus, I am probably the most concerned party about the careful and prudent use of the land and all of its natural attributes and beauty. Many of the conditions imposed upon my simple use of the seven plus acre parcel are all very well intentioned but they do tend to restrict the application of good environmental judgment by me for decades in the future. Clearly what I am NOT is a developer or land speculator. This is to be my home and all I am asking for is an opportunity to be a responsible citizen in a community in which we have lived for almost ten years. For your further background I have enclosed a copy of the 1990 Annual Report of New York Life of which I am Chairman of the Board. I am not tooting my own horn but merely explaining my priorities. I don't have time for land speculation but want to spend all of my spare time building better relationships with my family and the Nassau Point community. Sincer y, cc: Royal Reynolds, Senior Public Health Engineer John Bredemeyer, President, Southold Board of Trustees Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman, Southold Planning Board Attachment Sum rHs John J. Raynor, P.E. & L.S., p.c. Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor Deerfield Green P.O. Box 720 Reports Montauk Highway Water Mill, New York 11976 Design Phone: (516) 726-7600 Environmental Planning February 6, 1990 Mellissa Spiro, Planner Southold Town Planning Department P. O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision- Nassau Point Harry G. &Janet Hohn (SCTM #1000-118.00-06.00-1 & 3.1) Dear Mellissa, Enclosed please find the following items which we are submitting in connection with the above captioned application: 1 . Application form, signed by the applicant (1 copy) 2. Check in the amount of $3,000.00 for the Filing and Inspection Fees 3. One copy of the EAF 4. Statement Letter(for the County Planning Commission Review) 5. Copies of the applicable deeds as listed on the application form 6. Ten prints of the Minor Subdivision Sketch Plan 7. Three copies of a Topographic Map (@1"=50') Sufficient copies have been included for referrals to the County and Town agencies. As you will note,we have shown two foot contour interval topographic information on the sketch plan as well as the location of the wetland ribbons which we have placed(for your confirmation). All buildings have been shown, along with utility locations, pavement and earth drives, existing bulkhead and a building setback line on Lot 1 (as per Section 100-239.4 B of the Town Code). We are submitting this for department review and subsequent review by the Planning Board as discussed in our pre-submission meeting. Please review this material at your earliest convenience. Should you have any questions, or require anything further, please call me. Very truly yours, JOHN J. RAYNOR, P.E.& L.S.,p.c. p Richard Van de Kieft R R O 15 encl. PC: H. Hohn &W. W. Esseks, Esq. Lim�_ mm _ 7 WO Pb \S 550 Aborn Lane, Nassau Point Cutchogue, N. Y. 11935 ( 516 ) 734-5678 July 14, 1990 Planning Board, Town of Southold Town Hall Hain Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 Dear Members of the Planning Board: We are owners of lots 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 100, part of 93, as set for on the amended subdivision map of Nassau Point Club Properties, Inc. , as well as various parcels included in our title. Enclosed is a photocopy of a portion of a map furnished by the County of Suffolk Real Property Tax Service Agency showing all of the lots set forth as well as the parcels referred to in conveyances to us and guaranteed by the Title Guarantee Company. As such owners, we and our predecessor in title were taxed by the Town of Southold on individual lots and parcels at the time of our acquisition and thereafter. To assure contiguity of all of the lots and parcels acquired, we had requested a perimeter deed from the prior owner' s estate, and had issued to us a policy of title insurance based on a survey which encompassed all of those lots and parcels. That deed set forth the outer perimeters of the lots described in deeds to the prior owner from who■ we acquired title. We also obtained a policy of title insurance insuring those perimeters. In 1982-83 the tax assessors, evidently to minimize their bookkeeping, or the complexity of individual tax bills, consolidated all of the bookkeeping involved into one tax bill covering all of the lots and parcels. Upon inquiry made by us at the assessor' s office at Southold Town Hall we were informed that we were not prejudiced by combining all of the lots in one bill and our rights as owners of the individual lots and parcels were not affected. A written note made on our tax bill file confirms the information given by the assessor at that time that "combining of lots does not result in prejudice insofar as separate lots will remain separate in accordance with the filed map of Nassau Point. " Recently, we have called upon the Town Assessor and upon the Planning Board and have been advised to have this statement reduced to writing and have the same verified by the Planning Board. This reiteration of our rights and interests becomes important by reason of recent developments. JUL 17 1990 It is a matter of common knowledge that the water supply on Nassau Point is precarious at best. Much has been written and lectured on that score. The same is true of the waste problem. Any subdivision which further burdens these problems seriously affects the rights and interests of vested owners going back to the original development of Nassau Point. Any such subdivision immediately adjacent to our property could and would affect the availability of those resources. Such a subdivision has been applied for and granting this application would presently affect all of the environmental and health aspects, water and sewage among other, and could foreclose any interests which run with our premises, both presently and in the future. Will you please confirm and verify in writing that the mere consolidation of the individual tax bills does not in any way affect our rights and interests as owners of the individual lots as same existed prior to such consolidation. V r truly yo , GEORG ELL qIONE. BURRELL Encl. iiJ� 17 1990 0 0 n � ~ r1h 'u a o M eA r O c'' 1 ht ,a W •[t,, r , m aq0 • c i D t U U � m � O f M ` 4 ;oo: •ooy 1 `�4 rr ri W; co / Cl M o, � o. � ° r� c• � A a ora ,.°. .o`` .roe J ° y`L i •c I d9 J' i 4 d U7JIe � 9 to; '•°. i ••'• q .o ro O r r° q J po D ° C o '�a� • d m. fJ i . Er o� N 9 ' \i • �a \. •4 Ob ab JUL 17 n o , R Ao m "1 -f A b _� lam! �,, 1 A p •� � � /� � � ti � i1 .J � � � ?� 110 rh ,v n a � ?3 A special and executive meeting of the Southold Town Board was held at the office of Supervisor Norman E. Klipp at Greenport, on Monday, April 25, 1955• The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. with the following present: Supervisor Klipp; Justices Tuthill , Albertson, Clark and Demarest; Town Attorney Terry and Town Clerk Booth. The purpose of this meeting was to study the bids submitted for the operation of the Southold Town Beach and the concession stand thereon. After a careful study and a lengthy discussion on the size and type and amount of equipment that will be furnished, numbers of personnel that will be in attendance and what services they will render for the convenience of the public for the operation or the Town Beach arr the concession stand thereon, the following resolution was offered by Justice Tuthill; seconded by Justice Clark: RESOLVED: That Jack Levin be and he hereby is awarded the bid for the operation of the Southold Town Beach and the concession stand thereon. The Town Board feels that his bid is to the best interests of the Town of Southold and the inhabitants thereof. Vote of Town Board: Ayes-Supervisor Klipp; Justices Tuthill, Albertson and Clark. Justice Demarest not voting. RESOLVED: That Chief of Police Otto L. Anrig be instructed to make an inventory of uniforms in the Police Department and ascertain what uniforms the constables are in need of and see that they have adequate uniforms to wear at all times. Vote of Town Board: Ayes-Supervisor Klipp; Ju:,tices Tuthill, Albertson, Clark and Demarest. Moved by Justice Clark; seconded by Justice Tuthill: RESOLVED: That, effective May 1, 1955, pursuant to Section 271 of the Town Law of the State of New York, the following citizens and resident taxpayers of the Town of Southold, be and they here- by are appointed a Planning Board of said Town, in the name and style of Planning Board, Town of Southold, with all the powers granted by said Town Law of the State of New York, to hold office for the term stated to wit: Charles F. VanDuzer, for a term of one year expiring April 30, 1956. Serge J. Doyen, Jr. , for a term of two years expiring April 30, 1957, John Wickham, for a term of three years expiring April 30, 1958. Harold R. Reeve , Sr. , for a term of four years , expiring April 30, 1959. Robert W. Gillispie, Jr. , for a term of five years expiring Apr. 30, 1960. RESOLVED: that no action be taken by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, with respect to the appoint- ment of a chairman of said Planning Board, but that the matter of the selection of a chairman thereof be left for the members of the Planning Board. Vote of Town Board: Ayes-Supervisor Klipp; Justices Tuthill, Albertson, Clark and Demarest. Adjournment was at 9:30 P.M. Ralph ,P. Booth Town clerk — { 4aJ,N N.Y.a 7.U.Faa 0000•WieN—sorsa sal ails Dssd sr1,h a CuP-rMr � i S O eo�a�at-votw uwrae BOOM$141110110 nns.rutstrMe�r-run»anuMw►sttoutb 0111110 N LAMItW Wltt.. ueee58�8' PncE.4�6= oA L x e o 3:= t t TRW WbElf[UREi'made the 10th . day of January- , nineteen hundred and sixty-isix RZT* W' FDA L, McKNIGHT. residing at 16, Saddle Ridge Roads Ho+Ho-KU#j ,, New:Jersey,.,. psrtY,'of the first Parti and CHARLES R'. ALEXANDER. JR. ran iding,at 257" Aspen Streit" Floral'.Parkr, Long' Island`,: New York` a } r. 1 party,of the,second part; { O WIfNESSE H,that the party of the first part, in consideration of. One arid: 00 00----iti-+3-aa € h ----------------------------------------------------($1,00) doikw lawful money:of the United States, and other good and valuable conaiderationttid w+ bythe party of the second part,dots hereby grant and release-unto the party of the second part;the hdrsaf'» o successors and assigns of the party�of the second,part forevert - �.»�i - ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel.of land, dtuitt, { lying and befng1milie-, at Nassau Point, Town of Southold, County of"Suffolk, 1 and-State of New York, ,bounded and described as followst BEGIN1111I0- at a point on the easterly side: of Nassau' Point Road, 1, distant. 100.37 feet on a. course of North 12°'`22' 100,'Weat, from a, point thereon whore: it is. intersected by the: northerly side of lead now y or formerlof Abornt, running thence. South 540 (y21. 00H Sfed4d 200 feet; , thence, North. 90481 0011' East 120, feet) thenoe;Ili * �4d is 422 OOn' East 200>feet to the esaterly' side'wof Naeeeu°Pbilit Rtlsd"� F thence southerly along the easterly side. of. Nassau,.Point`.Road�on ka x ... i irregular curve< having a. tie line of. South 90 481 0010 West Ind'a length of- 120 feat. ie. the point or place of_ BEGINNING& r , 3 �� .•• Li3iaJDa7t] �AM .: �IQGXWM INA 11111 aitit.tide and' it san al fte r 7 of the fust part in and to my srreeu and iron&Asubw the ahoae deathbed prenises to the'center finei thereof, . with-.thio appartetuxes and all the auto and,rights of the party of the first pan in and to . r:IIAYlCATfP:'!n ttOl.D the premises herein-granted,ynWl0 11 the second part, the Mgrs or aattxsOM ad assigns of the party of the second part foseter." " A �sM 11Ft s-ryatyaf.../� .r a R t' a� the party-of the first pan covenants:that,the party of the.firstpart has not-done or suffered anything Wbrlt'tS tW MA prpmiaes have been incumbered in any way whatever; except as aforesaid. thio"Of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law,covenants that the party of ,,$la.AM"0 will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- ¢�,� Ritipp sa;Mat fond to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of me improvement and will apply ft#to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the tow of the same for other f'Rlp!'° r�L'F:rq �1K1 W4t "pW'SW he corutrued as it it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. K Fi+�+ttt• R# WHPX rs the puty of the.fint part has duly executed this deed the da d t y and first above* QLt�.c rtiflNH4; •– � qi iu rnasaat or: ZeG Cu d7— T�^'1T�'.1-'.i ^NIPS:ry-_ �-...n. - •.' ... r - ' aTATt♦Ol NTT Og'C OlL/f ,its STATI OI.NNW TORR CCU""OI'. �•: ' On,the 0 de7'ot A'M. 1M 64 before,me On the:-: day:of 19 I Woto me t'peJapeallyC■fnC'Yl- ualet. personally EDAL. McKNICEIT` tb.be the indidduale described In and,who to me known.tot be the,Individual : deaetibed 1!1 AM 1M1t0 r _ ( 01141 instrument,,and acknowledged that executed;the.,to ng Instrument, and reknoaledrgl lMtl r sl{e� Qatar :; the eaecut pinac' J -t Slr�la of PiL1! "W60 60If aTATa OPNnrToiu..cook"O!" atlslun OF"DLn= ourrt see■e e,r,. ' w...(w.r.e.u.w.N.ni..� t w.L tM,tYeY1w r watt of lF1o>'tW Collier ,.n. F tpgttt�t ? 1(er ;aret Clerk o� eht Ciituit eokkt,the.relnT:�etng a Celgt! - - �.`��.s��>•�. of Record,In said lot Jiaid':Cbyq(lgr dilaNnebya cirtifyTTt�lta11C".��Tlyllafg%1 Ie In .....-• ..S.t�SR11 ;AiM'••+�.. ^"•'•'•'" .... G and eb■f ■t the Ul{Ii p/ (P. Q, y * in.-Af /or, said, 6 ;i duly, a1ltAokred to taki,tltkU�idt edRreent/olid 4flidev �lQ d'nd.�ed!(te(�1`ana ' hdl AG of/ttWl dcG`NtoYtA Idt6f"kiwiMI /o.(ai{'�aG Nwil eT� (N {ru�rulryene ft a,(euied. nd� dcknotLledaed aceording to lAe Iddr e� MI Stetelo(•�b,rind IM i I ddlajYrs eTtspred 41U lai`1�bi t+u Wlenuine: IMW[rArE'Shcl OP,il `hone hH'unta set m�.kegll,andsteal -o� raid Conk,'fkG !fSlrtr I °i + — Margalse�;_T•,� 3�9t�y_.._._.., Clerk Ct►cui! l;'dYtkk v .,»•.,,.: 'bepwty.,ClHk +- ny papin aft, SECTION... a .•+'�. 4y Wt IN COVENANT ACAINSf G0.ANI Oa 5 AC75 ,. P. ,• ItO• �'�5„3 �"a JT LOT �. a r court oa'Toww of Sotlthold- Mx : EDA L, ,Mo "IICHT ' e 5 r CHARLES R. ALEXANDER;, J *'c R ""Wilt MMU �o a ' e1.1� 0. W ■ a■aaa■raT'1NRwl+ allot{u -. aS r EE' COAfPANY Leefferta,v Paine Edlibtli Saq: Southoldi vh NeYOPW-- �� itW tt.�ta i w f Cal �'s 4 rCOtdEO x 1 ��,�d��1e�e EE�•G1W-r�r :i 1 a ; utiG�53Mw.-33211, >} s,orN.N.T.RT.V.Iua,ap�-NY.IOtl-4m1•,N YIe DM;whh raaeu,u.pioe.Guue1 M.-Isdl.tle.L�fwpw•,b:.Mh�.'�*5 CCNftttf,Touk RAYFTfR feFOtif-SIOMlMe THIS-INS"UMfNTtTHIf INft'gUMfNTfMOYIY 11 Oslo of LAWIMf.afitt THIS INDENWRE,made'the�Ol °day of February,' nineteen hundred and.sixty-tix BETWEEN;. r' EDA T„ McKNIGHT', residing; at, -16`,Saddle: Ridge Road°4, Ho-Ho-Kus. New Jersey, r:.. party of the first part,and, y CHARTES R. ALEXANDERY JR. .,;residing: at. 257 Aspen!- tst•,. Mi px Floral park. Tong{;Island.. New York. party of the second part, g WITNESSrM that the party of the first part in consideration of len•dAlars and other:valuable coital y�y paid by the party of the second part, does hereby'grant an&release unto the hht klitparty of the second path tf" " e or successors and assigns of the party of the-second part.foreverp,,; ALL thatcertainplot piece or parcel of land; with the buildings and improvements:thereon ekeked.;iitYitti r; lying and.beingb"t* at Nassau-Point. Town- of Southold: County of Suffolk" + ,' } . and�Rtate,, of' New,York,,, bounded :ani described,tas follDwst— g BEGTNNTNG'' at a Point on the, westerly side of,, Nassau PointtRoa& " ; distant I M 37 feet northerly on a -course of North• 12 'degrees:=.22 t minutes 10 seconds west from a Point thereon°where dt:>is intory " " sected:by the northerly side, of land nowor- formerly of"Aborni,. p' running thence South; 54 degrees 42minutes,00'�seconds -Wes t; 200> , feet;�,,thence�- North,9`degrees 48^minutes 00, seconds East 12W.-fes, thence,<North-,54 degrees•42 minutes, 00' seconds. East '20f ^eet tofahlk, r westerly side, of Nassau: Point'Road; and--thence; southerly alongvtt(IIF'. N westerly side of Nassau,point" Road= onx an: irregularM eurvei havint,a ,. . . tie', line of',South";9 degreesu48�minutes•'00' seconds^'West�'and asleflgtfY��� of'120' feet- to thea point�tor. Place of beginning,t. JI THIS: is a Corr ection>_Deed.,given4 tov correct^•the v.des oriptitnj ilf"k rer deed- fromr. the, party;,oft,thetrfirst party heretolito thAApk!!tp�dt ?tom t { second=part hereto;. dated Januarya:l 0i`,1966 anda 1+ecdfdbcttiai"tftt y Suffolk County Clerk',s 0ffidef in',tibarie5898't ep` 496rofft' jfAff*w`;', ;! 21 1966.. K TOGETHER with all right ltitle and interest, if,any;,of the.party-of the first.part in and to any affect(and" ' N ; 'roads abutting the above described premises to the centerlines thereof S TOGE tHER with the apptlrtetpnta and all,the.estate and;rights,of he party of•the first:partsln and to said'pmnises,,COiHAVANT1sTO HOLD the premises herem granted unto the-party-of of the,second,pgrt, the heirs or successots-i" b+Ignto 1tY -:the'party,of the secondpart forever. AND`the+party.of the firstipart,covenants that,thv partyof the first part has hot done or suffered_+aflyth •K whereby;the'said premises have:.been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid.- i AND'theparty of-the first part in compliance with-Section-13`of the-Lien Law, covenants that the"party of y. the first,partwill receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such'consld • { cntionas a twat fund to be applied fine for-the purposeof paying the cost of the improvement and will ceppp�Iy thersame first.to the payment of.the cost of the.improvement before using any part of the total of the same fct anyi other purpose.. - - e :TheNword.,"party',' shall be+mnstroedas if it read,,"parties', whenever the sense ofthis indenture so rer uiteszy, IN,WITNESS WHEREOF,the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OFE t i Eda: L.. McKnight,,, ie.,ag i d S 4 i i ,„ _ ' '� °,:•viers, 116111t+f W c� ajCAC• str- tats of NM.TOOL 009111" Of, =5�i9 i.+.:333 Uo day of February- 1966before an On the.. day,of 19 PST fRRsfa before the petaonallr came,, Rda;,Lr Hefttght, R JiAml-, cribed.in and who to nm known to be the individual, described in and who Rft °1 cknowledged-that, executed' the foregoing,instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. .tom w - -sr.f �r �•^"° - - - . .; .� � aw of1att - �„ f• ri Huta{pat.19.19h(1: �i�n6ll.-►twtl+..c.... ~aarars raW c-c. ,]f'- Yewauanna w/w w r'. . : Y M rM H.a W.B.a,w.CwMr.. "aft of$10911141 -ca"Ur r6OTet T- Clerk o/ the-CircuitR Court, rhe fame being a Court Afford at ad=ja-NW-'County,' do hrreby Certify that-11 9MAti-V-((-_)seh`£e}` r f jt �,�wy! of i{e°liasr of dgning the /oregomg_�1iG1Q1.p1flC �lspt:ary Public in,and for midt County," Italy.-aut(tt>jited-fo 1G1F' isFsorot e>y 'MW 40fid'sOSS, and•corrtmiuioned and qualified, and .that 'aN kar•9f/! Dolt,m�;ua /SNA NII d+Id frIsof (heR She raid inthumant,is executed and oclrno p �y;�"lkled llNi of FI d&.1', W lhat the »gnatute fheratm purporting to be v ' � g}d°f61ad�)a (Aar�ntx o/ohs �y�WRW'WffsaoP I iaurhnaunto.at m hand^ � gNN February' , A. D. t9 66 r a'n( f�,rf a�•t.l¢-Cositi; f5a _Z33 d �I ._. " : '8 + f �u.3f ri! Court. l 1C {f1•�sl1M�/��` :, - R,S SECTfONa, BLOCK,-'. LOT' COUNTY.OR: TOWN�GGG ' I '•`A 0.eoorded•aP.R Homz Titi.e DI mon CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE`:COMPANY^ apfts.(O�IF 1fl1 IM NM!f[(Int fMtltttlifti `F Return by Mall to ^�Vkren�r.u � :aith/{pd%fl]tl1y. • _. i� � ��4'�T�.#iP<=p�lilA#IT� �� '• ., LEFFERTS P. EDSDNr:ESQ:` i ez Ii�RAQA A'iTiall Main Road• 5M{� 1i��l�A>ATP»•"PAIyFtA1YY'' , W,York, Zip No " CttL,rr,,,y�, ,yLd+.+itt r�„ . . . • -. i.' J� � :. RECORDED, [ire r CMAR,319es) .y to r.. �.R,E. PP Clsrkl•ol Suffolk County- ��c-<-a-�u,✓ i lr+�,✓ � ti:�o-Wf,.. e� id'rr�G v�G�CU ��w w- 91 _/rf �✓,� �� c��/� � �Ld j�hc-a, / � Z v Ir v 7rri ZZ f5" aspen Srreel doral ?ark, 4,Y. 11901 FORM No. 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N° 3606 Z Date ...........................Saptamher...7..., 19...b? Permission is hereby granted to: .......... Qeor&e Ahlera. A/C Chae Alexander .. ........................... ................ li t.QIW L%a............................................. to wild netr,ono fam��X.dYT@ . ?8.................................................................................... .. . ........... . ................................................................................................................................................................ at premises located at ... ......UT..f.w azAt).................................. ..........................................GuLc11Q.6 e4...W.0.7.9.................................................................................. ......................................................................:......................................................................................... pursuant to application dated .....................e90-11't........... ................ 19-67., and approved by the Building Inspector. Fee $..I06.00......... .............. Building Inspector FOR' NO. 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N9 4003 Z Date .................... .... 23 G8.. Permission is hereby granted to: Charles .ilexander ................................................................................ IT Pt 11oad ................................................................................ ...............4.Lltcj}o eue . ............................................ to buil... ne}...,tool.....hod.... Accessory...t:iu.G�.................................. ................................. . ..................................................................................................................................................... at premises located at .......Lot.•;T ..............ra sauPt••Prop . ... ......................................................... '.� .....P:a s:.au Point Road Cutc..... .........i: r.:=. ............................... ..................................................... ......................................................................................................I............................ pursuant to application dated ........................!W9..........23..............., 19.0-., and approved by the Building Inspector. Fee $.Jr.t�%�............. Building Ins p ector ' FORM NO. 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTH'OLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N° 6486 Z Date ........................ARx;,3.......J.f1........, Permission is hereby granted to: lbx�leY........................... bot[.....7..5� .......................................................... I?t—RdA/....CIAO=gue................. to Build an addition on eXisting dwelling . .................................... . ...... . ................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... at premises located at ..W/S_. Massau Pt :?ond,,,.,•UAW.,fron.JI qeF nieht)., large . ....................... ....PAX f a...21t........................as.s....................... .....................Cutchoguo. au Point Road ..................................... ....... . ................................................................................................................................... pursuant to application dated ................. Ar)ril 1fi 19.7 ..., and approved by the Building Inspector. Fee ........... C � \ ........... lam... ....�... (. � Building Inspector .. i\ FORM No. a TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) No 017505 Z Date ...Q.�.Qjku....... ................ 19... .8 Permission is hereby granted to: ..... ....... ... o �.�.Q. �................... ... gra'. n"................................................................................................. . .......... ct premises located of ....0..�.A.Q......f11.A.lpro.ou ...."-tel ............( 1� . ....... .................................................................. ......................................................... . J 1W4A�....l ....... ................................................................... County Tax Map No. 1000 Section .........1-J3....... Block 0 �....... Lot No. pursuant to application dated ......(Z) ,,.... 19 p, and approved by the Building Inspector. Fee ... ..,r!.L;l.'..�''..... .. �J Building Inspector Rev. 6/30/80 FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No. `G � Date . . . . . . TIIIS CERTIFIES that the building located at la/.S, t�ascat: Poiiat„Xo3d• • . Street . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Map No,i; ti5�:1U. .?O�.Tito QcISIb. P.rop. . . . . . . Lot No.:)=. . . . . Cut.ahogu©,. .It...'X.. . . . . . . conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated . . . . . . . . . . . ;i8'�� . .E . . . ., 13.6.7 pursuant to which Building Permit No. .300. 4 dated . . . . . iaent . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13.Cj., was issued, and conforms to all of the require- ments of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is Yriva'. , uLb i .iL1i� •Ct1ic.'.'_.j2?r� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C'Zer' os xi as.AINT G4'i.4T. . . . . . . . . The certificate is issued to . . .•. . . .- . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval Vi_la. . . . . . Building Inspector House TIPP80 Nassau P.oipt loud FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No. ..2...327.0............ Date ........... eptmmbes...3L................ 19.ria.. THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at ...Nj6aau••BoSnt••Road......................... Street Map No. ...................... Block No. ...................... Lot No. ..Cutchzguc.,...N.ew...Yark...................... conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated Augus-t..2.3y.....................1 19..68. pursuant to which Building Permit No. AD03...7, dated ..........August•.•23-j••••••••••••••••...., 19.GS.... was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ........ ...... sh®d...(acc®ssor•y• bulldinga.......................................................... The certificate is issued to ...Charles..P. 111exandes.................... ............................................. (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. Building Inspector I FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-17809 Date MARCH 1, 1989 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ADDITION & RENOVATION Location of Property 8880 NASSAU POINT ROAD CUTCHOGUE N.Y. House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 118 Block 6 Lot 2 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated OCTOBER 5 1988 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 17505-Z dated OCTOBER 6 1988 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is RENOVATION & ADDITION TO EXISTING ONE FAMILY DWELLING The certificate is issued to RICHARD & CHRIS HURLEY (owners) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N 060055 -FEBRUARY 27 1989 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED MARCH 1, 1989 - EDWARD SCHILLER Y�a4. C4 Building Inspector Rev. 1/81 r ; 3!h0 XAG 42 '_ _ TRIS-. INDSATURS Mde<, the 27 day of Novembers 51950, between YAYBBLI.E�L•' BAnmRIDOE1 .reaiding at QST Union of the' firet part# ane Street. Yontalair;'• NeitxJeraey� Party. p gDA: L::.; 1�ffit2GAT�c,residing at.: #4l2 Braeburft Roads go�go-Kua�. ' u• Nm Jeraey�• party� ot� the second, partf wyR . r YfiTNEBFRTg/ that. ten: par ty of thtl Bret Part in P, lawful money i coneideration of:^ thtl trum:of Ontl baliat. (�1':00) I of the btloond- part t ; `r r of.theUnitedr8tdttrsi, paid�br. tiles party ' . doea�hereby? gran4 •an&rolsabebUn#b¢ the patty bt the second � . 1 part-i-herheite andgrbi�t►e° fortrW3l� -` AI,L thbwtlrb,dbrtaln .iatry pitltitlY or patbeL: of land, situatelyi'rig;,and being. at Na11YrU Poiritt at S.ittla Nog t " No Oki hin.,the�Town of Bouthold� County,' of Buttbik and state, at +m wed andrdtrboribedaarwtalititrt U Yer Ybrk�, bo PARC1Ii"ONB�k � , EgCZNNI&tl at h�'PoiBt whei!! tile- btdifil high s , '• Rater matki of 1+6bonid ZAVitit i'1katY tilt rbutheriy s ' line" of"1�►rid aan"ytrd' alKabbil ?tb, bd-.tlbM r�yraii >, tbsfipartra'of thU tirrt:<patt"#9 K ` point btl ing 10po!!1# b1Ub� 0;to ot`.• haUtm, 'albh mita.btliriary high�mate ifrma k ftogLthus YaUt .t1j► Y of a'ib=foot' f wash:shown, Mot bf '&fbtibfl9s�lfaYY1►iiw propertisei iridx't trtaa'��fillldxJtiAhCbuffbik:Cauaty I Clerk' e .Off ii t '2'urining,thtlhb�Y. aibgg^ rNid:iafld can- - t atiflatib�bro bk ld�+tto, tb644 *r�buther. H.. 54 4PO"M 1 line •ots. said,.i0=fobs*MMy1�'thbr=l�aY#611 Yibag. >, t outran,ront2e t1�rA 1iriY of# ra l ib4tbbt,tray. 190 feet mole-or"-lb srt- thet►o8 kettle, a pori!"aria along land of thees Party„ oi. tho�titit pat# ori a'11rie- perein�deeoribtrd�s B rt4�4g; INh260ttrtrtff dortrGaibbr leee,•to•;aaia ordinary, highawatYt-.mark bf Peaonia Bbyf thanoa °nartherly: along d ordinary high water mark 100; foot to ,thea point of beginning. ; P RCEL, TNf01 , � P�CINNINC'at a point on the-boutherly line of Aborn Lane= ae shown on a certain map entitled albp, of .Heotion B--Naeeau- point` Club•- Yroppettler� Ino.a etc. filed, in, the Buff olk .CountyClerksa0ffiotl? o said point:being the .nortYnaeterly a rne r of land H d y Z r x I ” 1 y { . �a int • t ,h Y N y conveyed by the party ofthe first part to ^.eorge C. McKnight by Deed dated June 30, 19371 running, thence &long said southerly line of Aborn Lanes No 540 42' $.-80 .0 teed thence along other land of the party. oft the first, part,- 3 soureea, as follower (1) at right angles= to said southerly line of, Aborn lane,p 8e 35Q 18t 8e-150.0 feet= ( ' thence , (2) on a lineparallel with said " southerly line of Aborn Lane, 3. 5to he tW.- k' 250.0; feet= thence (3) deflecting to the if right 450 001 , and running N. 80 18' W. - 170 'fest, more or lees, to the shore of a I Poul; thence- northerly along the shore of >' *&I& pond1, 14 feet, more or lees, to said land, conveysd by the- party of the first st1,- I part' to George C. JbKnight by Deed dated June, 30, 18371 thence along said conveyed land 3 coursee, an follows$ (1) on a line I parallel with the southwesterly line of the promisee herein dasorlbed, Be 800 18' S.-150 k feet, more, or leeal thence (2) on a line r parallel with the southerly line of the Dremiees herein. dasoribedl No 540 42' R. - 175q,0 feat{ thence (3) GAIL line parallel with the easterly line of the premises herein i I � described, No 350 180 ' t. - 125.0 feet to the point of beginning. Ths' aafd two parcels being portions of the lands oonveyed by •Iswrenoe x, Bainbridge to the party of the first f C part by Deed dated July 25, 1931, and recorded in the Office ofi the Clerk of Buffolk:County' on, July 27, 19319 in Liber 1419 'of; AsedA p;at page 479. TOUTH$A•with.the• appurtenances and all the estate ' ' ' and'gtBhts;, of 'the. party, of the .flrst part in and to said r ;y prey aoer- TO%HAVX.-AND'TO HOLD: the pre mi see herein granted Y ' unto. the party of` the , second part,. her hairs and assigns C>i �_�i I fo=nTer� sub,��et, bowel►&,, to covenants, restrictions , liens a»4 ena0branoss of r000rd, if anye :fir f4 b a AD the.! party-of the first part covenants to and "i the party of the second part, her heirs and assigns, ,�r .q` ..f4. TV) Wr426 that she has« not'.done or suf fated anything thereby the said premises have been encumbered in any gay thatstera IN VtMSSTNMR80rol the pittY of the first Part has hereunto loot, her ilatld and: flout t1s ,day and yeak first 4 above,- writtena In, the= Pro setloe„, of l d rU� :J t" 00UHTT, Or"RRw,YOREi on, they borers on ?` came: �YffiMA Lar BAMRiDatff td nod AIIO#AA fid' the individual described In, and;�athaoass duted^'ithsrf8 ftgdifit,Ito trrmsnto sold j.- aeknowledgetL this ,shcotooutad^ th#j.fI"1e 4• + .o FLORENCE E. DOSS- No. OSS Ne.60.3364400d,. tit OWW"in W.etth.st,Cauety rr,"• Cees.filed N.Y.Co.CII:B Dag.OFF.- „y";F Term.aphes Metch 30, 1951 Star-al Nen YorR t f �y QQ 1� Cowy al Nen Yor�, r rr.t Na 839/ I, ARCHIBALD: R. WATSON� t3 ud S of Record Irving 67hw a HRE �tit-QJw YorkCimino,a l.+r+ J wbose name L subseribed ta—the atmea af6dadl�e�osl t�ry&ata .. �Dr D-.. or proof, wits, at the-time of taking the enure a M8TU LY. PUBLIC ie�Far nl t New,York:duly eanwllssloned adl sworn ant jnaBBM to ac{ as Muth the N. `n,, of New York; that Pursuant to law a torn alis on, of fiesta of eaer.,r.. �. E"'O and his autograph.signature;-have been!.filed in my offitel that such Notary Pwa >r was'duly authorized by the laws of the State of New York to administer aUu and sftw.,,.. 6 1950 to rttdvt avd,certiy the acknowledgment or proof qI deeds, mortgages,powers of atterwt yr DEC other written instrument for lands, tenements and hereditaments to be read Is e.wee „ C recorded in this State;to protest notes and to take and certify aadavlt std detoli,a / ' 0 M that I am well acquainted with the handwriting of succhtt Notarr or have oam e,w D HUGHES signature on the annexed Instrument with his autograph sign d Iced b tap ud.q ...� R.FOR believe that the signature Is genuine. - "t.FliKGF SUFFOLKCOUNT'Y... IN WITNESS.WS�RFOF. I have hereunto set my I I this.........._.............. _.. of. FEE PAID PAID 254 - �n ((dd�;�/ �� -4W94. Canny CW a of 0 the Sgrnw C ;;; wa t,+.., Nen York,-?arf ty of t'11 lrst •purt,_iint) <Liit37 Old Slip, Haanhattan •off}h, Cit;, County and State of Mew York, and LAWRENCE )A. I3AINBRIDGE of�j('25 5rw1n,y • td, !Abet clniir, New Jersey, partiesof the second part, WITNrSSETII that the party ofd n i first par: in consideration of One ($1.00) dollars,lawful money of the United Stun I other good and valuable considerations, paid by the parties of the secadd part, a� reby g.- ant and release unto the parties of the second part, their heirs andusoigns raver. ALL that certain piece or parcel of land, situate, lying; and being at Hass r.� Int, or Little Hog Neck in tihe town of Southold, Suffolk County, Ne w'Yark, bounded/)" scribed as follows;- B°.0 INNING at'a stoue.monument, which_Sssituoted at the porn+r rmed by the Intersection Qf the westerly side of Nassau Road with the southerly sir.W Aborn Lane, as said road and lane are laid out on a survey of said premises made �1 llace H. Halsey, Civil Engineer and Surveyor, May 1919; running thence south 540 at seven hundred and thirty (730) feet to a point in saidlane, thence still along; t utherly side of said lane as it winds and turns to high water mark in Peconic Bay fence in a southerly direction and along: high Nater mark of Peconic Bay eight hundrt id twenty-one and eight one-hundredths (821.08) feet, thence n.+rtherly 54° 43' Nast u•oug;h a stone monument to another stone monument in the westerly side of Nassau jad, said course running a distance of six hundred and forty-five and ninety-eight . indradths (645.98) feet; thence in a northeasterly direction, along the westerly s: ,e Hassau Road, to the point or place of beginning. TOGETNER with un easement over issau Road and Aborn Lane for access and egress to and from said premises. TOGETHER ith all the r1,ghL , title and interest of the party of the first part in and to the and under water in Peconic Bay, abutting said promisee. Said bract of land contain oout eleven acres more or less. SUBJECT, however, to an easement over a strip of and extending fift,en feet in width along and above high eater mark, which shall fo art of a coi=on roadway for the benefit 'of all persons owning lands on said Nassau olnt, including the grantee herein. AND the partie sof the second part, for then elven, thnJ7 heirs and itesigns, do hereby covenant to and with the party of Lhe fl: art, its su,:cessors and assigns, that the parti.�e of the second part, their heirs a .ssigns, wllL not at any time erect any houses on said premises costing less than 'wo Thoudand Dollars ($2,000.00) each, except the ordinary outhouses. 'he foregoln.; covenants, restrictions and reservations may be altered or annulled at Lny time by agreement between the party of the first part and the owner for the time leing of the premises hereby conveyed, and such agreement shall be effectdal to alts gr annul said covenants, rOOLrictions or reservations without the consent of the owy )f any other or adjacent premises. TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the es, ind rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises. .TO HAVE ANO TO the premises herein granted unto the part-:es of the Second part their heirs and as: forever, •subject as aforesaid. AND the party of the first pact covenants as follow: FIRST: That the party oIt he first part is seized of the said premises in fee simple and has good right to convey the same. SECOND; •That the parties of the second part shall quietly enjoy the said premises. THIRD: That the said ;remises are free froi incumbrances. FOURTH: That the party of the first part will execute or procure any i ' further necessary assurance of the title to suld premises. FIFTH: that the party of the first part will forever.warrant the title to the Said premises . ' IN W11NESS WHEREOF the party of the first part hue cmJeed tLe corporate seal Ito be hereunto affixed and these presents to be signed by its duly authorises lufficeru the duy and yeap first above written. NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. By WALTER S. JOHNSON, President. City k State of New York, County of Kings, ae: On the twenty seventh day dot May nineteen hundred and nineteen before me come Wqlter I;. Johnson to me (known who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides in the (Borough of Brooklyn, City and State of New York, that he Is the President Of Nassau Point Club Properties Inc„ the corporation described in, and whiel executed the foregoing lnstrmment; that he knoae the seal of said eorporatil i! that t'.e soul affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it wac so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation; - and that the Signed ilia name Cher oto by like order. Louis Sherman, Commissioner of dt IC1ty of New York. I nrATK OM NKW YORK,COUNTY OF KIM".rl—L WII14r C K Ur.Cwl.f twCw•V.W KI ' f+rn Iw rIJ wunV. IrW Cw11 WK•6u.t •Y, nN•Lw Olr4 r{w M.P.r• W Krw•,,JY I�.r-\r r.{N,tW.Zonis Sherman ! 11y.nu..vJ IIr{rYP.n{,•M tY.ryuY vrlt4n.wu w tL.IYv Yf y\u.�o Vru.'1 wl� Y=M IIOuy of Vruul Y. YnerlWypw { Y/ ` • Le Cos.f Nur YurY,uw4yNJ.rlIlYr •ucY li uu.n w.Wn .uJ\ I..... CummW Wap ur Ur4 .. lw Y IlY WIWµll u{14..4 rWry W IlyµW aur 11 ll. f . I w v.YYur4Jpu.ut uu4r: .yJ 4yL 4u.w I Nur Yw\. • r. Y uruWl.rYl.0\Yur4y1W .purJuY W w 4r. W Mu yyy W I lu 1blWyy.Wl..r.,1. I4.o WnuYW w lav wIW wJ .IWy 40. IL K., •Ya CwN{e4 G' JYr Yr wl 4 Iw..w l.wYl, Nqy M. 9 Nocorded 31 May 1919 0 9 A. M. I I I (36.00 U. S. I. R. S. 'CAN. ) ( THIS INDENTURE, made the twenty seventh dayof Uay nineteen hundred and ninet IBET14LEII NASSAU YUINT CLUB PROYrJ2'1'I E'S, INC., a corporation oreunized under th luws or the state oP Hew qp arty of the..,.-_«3- part and DAISY U,,DEL VANSTO: ( residing-at"lt1Y Clen Slda Ruud, GuuLi Or—=�e, in the State of New Jersey, jpurty or-tha second part WIM'SSETH that the party of the first putt, in co. I ration of One (y1.00) dollar, lawful money of LheUnitad States and of ha'. good and valuable considerations, paid by the party or Lha second part, does hereby grunt and release unto 't the party or the second part her heirs. and use forever. AL1, that certain piece or parcel Of land, situate, lying and being but Nusuau Point, Or Little Hog Neck, in the town of Southold, Suffolk County New York- bounded and described us follows: BEGINNING at a point at high wa t�{ .v � w..a.,r,, n . ,• r-.wv•..., ..un..,.....1t.,.IrA w..,....... �...t..w•.•. .t.i." '.r.,.,,.. . : ._ _ eowwr YOUR LAWTO"nor 91100"wM setrrt w-"w sanlwwr rams MY ase or{uwssr eVW. - , :IEP 769 M6 2% t - ` " THIS[NDENTU Er made d 16th day..t August .tt,,,uma haeand and aeventy�four ..: dET~M BARBARA A:URN PECRt '.N, residing at Ino 9) Putnam 8alg6ta Putnam, Connecticut 062600 ■ -< "lam party of the first pan,and M! 110 TROMBONE and ILSE TROMBONE, his wife, reaidl.6�f���. at 50 Sutton Face At Bev York, New York 10020 i'' Zrl f" ohC REAL E;SAT[ t��}�" STATE OF tt PIA'`t a \ 't :Lr cc La tiNK4 TRAMFER1AX a EW YORK a t irin "4117, 13170 .*► ). r AA's panY Y!/the mnond part, - V the the aei .a the first rt.in eonaidention of ONE and 00/1.DO��r .*;, t �� wTIN'�SE[341 r t r ;y -(51.00)- IrS H� u.ml trromJ of the United SAN,,,, and other good and valuable consideration,paY by the part) al the rrtvred {an. d-r.h.rehy gran) and rehax n:.;o the parry of the In nal pan.Ifw ltdra meoaae,a and awig•t1 of the ra�,. nt Ih, s ,,nd pan fur-rer, ^ '` AIL that eenain ybrt. 1 ler..r parcel of Lint, wish the Ivildingt -ttd impfoYem mb rMravt 4e0ed,ruder bins■tn'bing ialtlblt at Cutehugue, Toon of Southold, Suffolk.COuntp, Rkt1;Y� ,e ct: bounded and described as fillowes BEGINNING at a mriument on the curved westerly line of Nassau PolYk. Road it the northeasterly corner of Lot 792, as shown on •Ammnded�1(so'l Of Nassau Point," tiled in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office V lYp;�{ly and from said point of beginning running .long said Lot 792, South 43' 00" west, 635.00 feet, to the ordinary hiyh water mark of PeOonip'rp • 3 Bayr thence northwesterly along said high voter mark 200.02 feet. W� �t • '= land now or formerly of McRnightt running thence along raid land Meknlgnt North 54. 43' 00" East, 732.16 feat to the westerly 1ine.0f',`.;•,b• Nassau Point load; thence southerly along the westerly line of�lfasrdalY `ls Point Road, the tie line of which is South 80 42' 400 East, W.62.:�fN�F to the point or place of beginning. -?,;-t ' TOGETHER WITH a right-of-way for ;urposes of Ingress and agressy� -f over th , southerlyan portion of the premises ltttatedlately adjotninq on �t11j- �. North of premises herein conveyed as shown on survey of Roderick,Vsn - Toy], P.C. , dated August 9, 1974. '• 'Tali+K x'L f$y SURJECT to a right-of-way for Y -surposes of Ingress and eyrHs OOq'd ,$ ks northerly Portions of the premises conveyed herein 1n favor bf premlrese�, Aacy 4 I t, N Y'a Y � ci "} .•Nr`V •.•`K+� ?,f l� fir i e` �IAr!•i •i :.i.. A .•k r� r�'y� 5 }f,� trlx��` r' ��'x i� i3.�' 4'� v �y}ir '1� �:ri � •r2 �y•�S' . a4� ;` t� f #� •.++x.-t i �, , t r••+6y.1 L;" v r �SVrof�� ( 5 .1' � , t h`�r5 �ap�.. is o t r�a 1 1 • � �4 e. • 1 • F Rr r y kc� aY �•�rl "f ;• -�x�Ye a , r.c Tr ♦ f t . .i; t I 1 J M • � Y � � • +�aa� Int x+x� J n��� ;l°�•V x' • F .a :.:T to y.:p « �'t1ty •`f 7, �, rgq�x'x Forib {F ++ py. �ft kri f 1. .-} 9� t+��; y,,,tit Y •,. t v, r•� x • i �� .wa ��;� ilt is f�•'� ,s r' i �_ � ^r � {�,; 1:•' It t ,at ,� ' �� �t.H��.j•q.p, iQ,� e jx r 4l.en I. • OO I y I" a [N 7697 pw 288 TQC. rl"with Al nIM , n•Ir and imernt,it any.•d-the ploy of the fn at, 0 ud to my rent"W!", t rndr abutting the ahr'r C.n[nl.d rxemws to the omter lion thereof, POCEMIM with th, ant all the eaottr and rights of the paq d the !rM pen 4 and to .it 1�iwk M HAVE AND Ytr IN"thr •tren'iiws Lenin♦:ranred w,,, the Perry e 1 t6, Inwwl Pen, the he4a pe `a 'aeewwor.ud asaians u th'ryn. of thr wnmd Pen flnrrrr. ('t^ c j� 1 $S v "M l ry a�1A�t �p e A_ W ry r S ! 'y rt �;,y F 5',iltl JYk �yYi•:II 4,it1 A.VD Ilw Peaty of the llrwl Alt mt••n.nn that tie party of the first Pen has nM tlor a pdkred Itlrythla( n'a!rrby the said ptemisn 111rr ter. Inn mbered In any y wa whit teeer, eaotpt u lubrndd '. 'j•[b•�^ :: fl PID The party of the first :,w;!, 1n �rmyillatrce with Se[rion IJ of the lien Law tawrstnb 91st 111! " 1 tiir fq i Pen ""receive tM c-'t hlr.atirm for Ihia trFl.eytnee and wt;HJ thl richt MI Motive.mrh Ltvss kt- cr:.Lim ss a Ir,st fund In he:Ippj,d t.r•t In.the put"of in'tr4 d nthe hnprrtetlalnt and wiU 4i Ivy 4 rt t.v me rirwt h.Ih S ,.t . plyment nt J.•cent of the fmpto"ement hrlorr win[any pan d to 11< hJ o1 IM ark SW!a► I '"& ar•r Daher puepene. T le word"prty" [hall le trinaned at if It read"panles"wllrmrvrr the unw o'UIhia i.tde Lute owas� trytr•tK S 1� v" R11LV MFIERE.OT.tRw pant ..f tM Litt Pen hu duly eaeMld Chit deer. he dy aw!yav PrR ahora'M� YM InMrL -I�:.Y.r. 4 . e' r I t reaaaMCt o1: f tV r � nI4� ,� at t'i bazna A o»�1i:F ups p 4 W1 to F 1 1 e'v•Y.w r 4,1. r. •naso a rni OM OW"ON SUFFOLK r , an nAn M stele ratty ttaaN/T b tat '�t.d 'Y 16thday.. August, 19 74,billions ase Os the P "�1y taste BARBARA BARBARA &BORN PECKHAM PBY d � •ielw r Y tar k sswiCts b?,Vw Indlridasl described in and wL: an loss mn lws to 1e the iedirldlW dmee0ad is ssd Is" - • is .4� Mted er�binKvn.lrnlr•+1, and adulowkdeed that eatevled the faeetsinS InMNNnus•Y N, ad ad ss {dse tilt execkwid 11�i MM1Iss66 eaawad the naso u. Y/"j + - r� �. & a1 Public �� yytttt� v NOVwaso I. Laps {jV -+ alr Y-1aYlw. e.Nta..l.s a.rl/w sr.a r.la :t'A,y 1 STAIN a NewN S } rl ToeR eorwn or ... mn Of Ner rou,tcoaNtT a On the day of 19 before out On the day w 19 .4elew Nr 3c� personalty came to mr Ylrown,who,6ri116 by sole duly .worn. 'd dr oow and .,me known,rho,heirls by mr d*awmn,did depme ssO x •� my soar Ie reside at No- say that he".ides at o. OfIe is the that he is the Of in and whits aaeerlyd the tht ervpntkln described Ile eorptwaties drq _..syL /or".iryt inalntmrnt: that he in and which eget-wed the foregohq inwelNtese tbd kmwt the Tal of mid corporation. tti: th, sea] affiatd knows the ad of said MF) was; that the seal ~iow—. eo said imtrmn�.at i. ..,h corp"t. oral: that it was an tr• mid hint U No is sachl mrporNe Kill; that it wr r 'a aEatd by nrtkr Of the hoard of dir..in,a o1 mid trgx,m. affixed by order t' :he board of direelon of Yid sYyms.' C d tim, and that he ird h ttanw thereto by file order. tion, and that he siSncd h Gar Z` ales thanso by Om i en11 a � n w �atpb M Mle Petb Wlbl(AI,INAN, A4AINH GL.Nlin% It is 1ECilON t h Ting No Title -..renuoci 2Q,�B � a; G• 1. t. SL BARBARA ARORN PECKHAM canvas na ?OWN 70 MARIO TRO1BONC & ILSE TROMBONE, f.UG 16 4xjs �� n..sero M llq.e d Il.Tim awrwM Galaalle t "7 his wife ateroaw ON Yaa Ne, wrr.sr w tw saa.w..w wu wwwwNlws I Lefferts P. EdsOn, y5< m'"aie ti Main Road • , • +7, s MEGl1ARl1NTF6- Southoll, Nae York 11971 !Y }l t NEW YORK .3 anmstnwnay Wells C. JIl r w'�,fla ro r s: TW r � r s 4�'iP >t,,+,Gr A Xfa �o��'XS •E � ! 4Yfbs �3� r�•�.y a 1 {i' a. '"� �°j ♦ A f� fi..ls R kv aV Y'kt�'F �.4�'"�1.'�S� ,>}'J"W} •YJ} �,S to Py,! yq� �!+'' f455s 4.a, Ldd�� R. t f4a y' �, tF Y V Zrts' M til ���yH� •S + T I�• �S r {., A-�R "�', W4 f�Pkr"*a'.` /3 'r "'l': �'# :Tfa�rYv�Y, r+ "�;� -i.hn.r .%!•x Y� t rs , N e wp � + l+srf# Id yip + sf r .' h;),p14 ems'"' 1yyf Y,` DOPOT111 t B. CHUTE. residing A fSt Flin� m PIC 27405 f 4 7{53• Y f- Bn ffri '� all•.• ; kUy A. VWICIT. Oats Circlil., s. North Cm fIjna 27438 q, i � y a�arerN !gyp wi_ Vq y'ii ) } if arr4� tl� y ,+aRtlTyxaM1ti} 3'.pF•H 21{4.y,J y, .{ .` i 6r .YM Lf }yY �rL1iX"s "'. ty4s'i .•" F #r .+ +..�rL ' l •*�tJ�Di'.'i �+rpi• r LT } 4, h' t t.., API? ISSO #'YG.yF.f4 iy 19�1fi v •ti 1 f {h Y a - r}, f 11 r.• } ll frT tb Xs ~ i1 ra ' r �r 5ri F Krt t' r,r i ♦. fY.h �i^c rj�a,a tr '�• s:� r,,, � ''fir ,ts� F..�v "^f.`F.,_.-..a: , .� ';�{� � 7 tf; y5,. t 'E . ,, kQ�: r",� � �:.• �}.ks � '''+ ni+;ri�>... R.A:44 Tq Z f�v xri 1k' s r-•;� iR eeYYsk. �.'Yu t > I w +.I`yi k 1!y f tiY.K t tALL ihls Und ry 11 Of !;Quthol'��' UffoIk Coulavo flow Y01 ii, ur I.,ttle 1"q Wick, and known and do j ill, ad lub Properties Inc., ni.,,ilts �. be Town of S1,1111-.1d, Li Island, N June ri, A,'d tile i-arties of 1922, at pi nd with ♦by1+'+ s 1 f �''LR�yZ: her ijt y "'I" 'it "fly t"i" hietile un said prom,t nosw- such d,oll,iii + tTh" �OreqoLnq cOvenAnt, restrictions or ar be fit; ter'd hb srPoint Cluo Pir,vii , 7,1 ,d the owner to, the tIni Lit iOf the premillallT'�1 WT ri r y ! "y f.- R> L yy{4N1aid covenant , � }� �' the c .y do l b T ons ¢�} r r h 4 i P jN 1 �t;Lit— }! lr -'r'� .t'lt !1 r'}!'"'La 4. �i � '� .'�v d 'iy. t�r ` � '4,, � � c'l'a� ,'.,�`y a �Y+5�.r n`1 ; '� � Y "'� 'r1�� a 1N,�•�'i' „* � '*1 a:►!• t �� r ��♦jlQj :.. k34+•i.ri x 'i.•C t �ayy tx, aj�* ► r i '. ►}v .a k � y�qq� i i '� fa 1) °k- 1 {cw Y `9 aµ. 9 t�' ♦t •� Ittt A.A R^ �M. ^ii� r�.f: y 'a;� $ $ t � J, e� J � �� Y C ?;�,5� � .N �+Y,;V 1� 1�1 S� ��I I;e {r►Y '^I� �.x f�. -n 1" • #L. w�-! �..� t�>L w .� k�q i fii` ':d Y >l.Ir3;• 4 {u. f �0 � �4 { 1•� �+� i f� 1 s c 1 t' nJyj}7, t F I rjj A!r : � F '' � 'ry � • Yt . r to 1 + t s r Y • d 4 tf t "�w8't J�• 5 � . "' x ri Y 9'r .,� h .� A i �• T i • ✓ � q j�� 711 z � xc 1�wl"8y 1 }� �f '.r •.�'� 6 T l P7 VJ�° � a �j. • "t Yr L < yp , f {d A,� •fix s Cr �jt^"Aif � �.. "� °r oe xr r r- S { ) 1 11'1 A I , • �„yea;.,�;. �t'��4�+ , x % x `�` '� �sy� rrxF �t ��� ,js• III r6d•(v,.. f¢. ri a w. II'1 kr s1.Ya j c F}pttpF�'rt;i� r „ i �tI I it ii 3 Ik 'I TI♦ �` } Y R� i 1 )e1 lvfi �•}� r C + 4t, � dNl ?1 � r 1 �. ' �fU � +•� yj f �5 w . ✓1■ i , l♦rY�] IS a ��• .[p•r � Yi�,F 11 >. C __l�.T ••l r a l�� ♦ •• +' .2.31111 1 I ..Ta � I,.li, i `� r , . � u / lw, a 1aA+'ji �A `xr ♦ e ti�>V14i•t'aIi u {ate T , t6• t,(♦ >`I i.%'a 10a w • ♦ yu tt i.. +� i s tal!i��__l? =i'. •�',. 4ar ex a , .. .♦-a ] ���.. �a ♦.t�ifl rN s � .�'ii• + � '>;;�•� -{.J.i_1'�jl.i .[.Y�ti•'•�r>"!�f.. t ,. «++rrr rw,r u>eY�tlmaaa etatmNr "`' ).1 - 'fie rt. y mix 591 PLEASE DO NOTP86USH a s r�"TIT mod,me 27th day of February ,aiaemm hm"ad Eight six , WnrM CH;_<LES GRAHAM KISKAODON and REV. JEAN L. rISKA000N, his rife, peY -0 MMM , r 350 Aborn Lane, Nassau Point, New York 11935. L_ • i nwb of the ant Pmt mW CANOACE GRIMES,, residing at 114 H l argton Road, - i Garden City, NEW York .153f qij (E j IT /(EyJAI�� gal.kS7A 1'E , 'r'lii•18 ` NAII y Panty of tie amad Pm, ' 1 nu NS * thw .y 1• SUF OL�( �7� AX I Wb d lir firm Pr.Iw mmclftae .1 CMINTY TEN 4: Jm 1 O1"d the Valrad4^11at4 _ Sft6* and other lawful consideration by the Pry Of L a ttesrd put,does be_b1[r-t ad retrace um the Pammy of an mmol part,dw hda W � �d awipn d the Pry of the taom part bma, as r that eats yam,al'R F`nvt Of hd,wkb the b.MbW Ped tmpetrwmtvta thtaara th"Dw. .. yu a•�to at Nassau Point, or Little Hog Npck, in the Town of Southold b: yt; _ r"+' Owned County, Ne,; York known as Lot 99 on Amendcd Hap A, of Nassau potnt Nov.ed or Na,. S Poinr Cn,b PICA^rues Inc, situate In the Town of Scuthon Island• Y, surreyed by Otto W. Wan Tuyl, C,E. and Svreeyor, 6reenpnrt, On June 8, 1922 znc filed In the Offr : Courn N,r, on August 16, 192- file N e hf the County Clerk in Suffolk o. 156. All that part of Nassau Pont (formerly Little Hog Neck) situate, lying and ' F - b•�Irvi .n tri, 1, ,rl of I a ,w [n,;rr., inuntY of Si,ffglk, atP c/ New Yo and descrl Md +s foil,' rk, Doundpd Y.ix FiAP BEGINNING ata x t `r".%Arom trap entitled- •�nt on 'he h14h wa er IIrIe of lot 112 as sh nate Map A of Nassau Point Owned by Nassau opoint Club �alnt �+ 1000 Properties. Inc.. dated J'inP 2R, 1922 and filed In th. 'I: Office August ih, 1922 to File No. 156 as the Suffolk County Clerk's 118.00100 as shorn cn said nap; s0' .heasterlY corner Of Lot No. i B405.00 r 10ing through said la;don two courses as follows: L.di6cdoI 6orth 250 30' East 85 rept. 2) Thence 253 "' East 90 fePt to the high water mark at the dlvlslnn line between Lots Nos. 99 and 101; ' Thence Westerly di Ong said11gh water mark and along Mo, 99 to the ` BEGINNING. point of ' . Subj between to mo-tgage daled)n�DtemberUelia 811978 recorded September a. 1978 DetrPen Dario J. ":cer.. _ and Llron age G. Gogen, hit wife mortgagees tcrecomort a ei ager. which a mortgage hes a • ay °'Orta 990 and Rldvan 6 grantees hereby agree tlg Drinclpal balance of 3� Jr. Liber 826o Page 443 1986 9 '.o assume at.J hay together w interest Which the 1 with Interest frgw February 5, ` the hrentor> herein are the yt es same rsons a; he grantees In 4. IBP[ recordeu Jai�.ar. he user 4e Paye es Dred dated Janr•ry 05 the within dntCrinP' roal o,it V Is not°rt .nbrah:.'P. n. f®r y. ..�I 1 by a credit It" mdrtga.., 5 M 7OCOffs 1 WI&r VOL dam mad isaar.Y mmy.d dw pry d tare Cd pan is tad w Aaw mamma w mammim abntiy t!♦rare draeI& Mme+to der carer Mos tlenmL MAMMA will d aplwatm seta rid all do max aid rwms of tla pry at +t firm pmt tL tad s amid pair, TO HAW!AND 70 HOLD the passe battle crated sea Mt pry d taro"mood pr. t4!made w 'aessas •a;rtaacrr d tw pry of the se®d part Ir-e.C. i .1 r e a. y rti M413 tf rorty d We brat part, to mnp;arre with 13 of toe I ien las,comenants tlam the party of tv Rrr rwrt will reetire the coft"r tion for tL::cor.tryitce and will hold the right to rrcein.urn tormid A„a ("iwAp i u eratirc u•trnp ford to he applied Rry for the p+rrpire of paying the mat of 11w hrtprwement and will apply tyyy + tt'} � x imprm.m.nt More m� .g any part d tM total of the v.ne bra b Fn � I.a�r cl 7 1 w same Rr t io the payment d the.aro„I.Y u* any alp purpose � 77w word"parry"shah he aratrard as if it rind "'Artier whmerer the w-r. of this indenntrt so rftll:ires. r tit t' 'Z Fd- .LY NTLM 7 "EftE.Mare party of the first tart ham dWy execvtrl this cetl k day and Ira tint � �y Ml eM"writt.a t I . IY' '9 ire ewrwca or s �I xm-:✓ , x✓ 1# 1 � t f.IIARLES A1AN KISKADDDM � {, A. � � Y r. / / ✓ [ r << RI Y,,' LAN L. KISKAODON {IF Qat 1< }.( . tktr�� •: EtE11Eq11 f ...•,:aid it ,. ':uu,....n«L.it�i�l - ._r:..""'¢t3E'•Iw 39Yt31.W�yr.6tsV is �• ,$ i� SY,/:�,, x £ • - .��.. 16.t:J•J:72 .ttE JJ� , rrw a OWW•CK tfolaVn« SHFrit K Ontis, 27th dq d f nhrll.sry 19 5Y, hdot` I horn a.tr..tort.chu.rr w So`folk r• i. pasomuy t>mt . rt ha (M the 27th dsy d February 1995 . beforeor 1y� (y. m�tx ,me y CHndLLb GRAHAM WAADD04 A REV. JF IN L.. '.I SK', 'DUN CAfDICE C. GRIMES M; b See klsrwa In be It• individtd dattibnl in a,d whn In +hr kehrrwtT b be the ihdixidval delltriMA is and who .. or�oi eaated�Igxsoiq irommle+tt. .nd u'L ro..lelted !hat "r`"Qa O the sve � Ind MllzvwledW Ih.t R flu y Dltc r WEIRPAMwN,TARR N art .: AD" PAMTY-TrsTr rn .nr rsI 8 J: u []� 111�COvw nate wstell �nar tlo wriwl0.li', :1 the 70�Chltlfl W it STATE W/EE1w TORR,CC Wrr W � [, Sr K9l,f I.T Ply caste d Iv On the I On.he day d 19 . before not Y �y c g . ,+,•i '1 nyme kstowq wbo,br'"11 by nee d11Y swnrn,Aid dry,ose uM the subrvibltt. nbas b the s that be n idn n h'o. fotgdo( 1hRnment. wieb {Ai3,*7y^+.`7:;, ! whpn t w rerwmiy .gnsinted, M. beirit by ct drily -r.. tM he a the [worn.did dr ox+W my that be raid,ore 01 Of that he know[ f yp4 rt ! h .the nwporatim d se,,," + t� kyy�M' io W >bxh t:aeyte7 the in g"se d.nonterrt: tht nr F r 18`7 know. the wort d Said I :n he the lydiTidod _ rvpantirm: tyt Stir rd rTyd described in and wbe ezawW tx tpgos� jro.��. �.Od`I��h hof di. Kd. .till it wpo, that he. fid anbe.lbn( ,:tsem� wea Qr,m( .pd Ow If)w.avd"lt4! he ebb d dr _has of taiA corpora ev c the nme;mW that he,aid wither, a, .'[^'d h 'alt:tflereto 1'y like order. I at the rrnr time subsc ib d b Astir, u wiener tb.,mm PLEASE DO T:UTPUBLISH e jr t a,. l Wrnrp:T G+vd�ry v.I"r Qaeeeyrat ACTI In nra - ;t ruI'nn nor nowt r t EGK ADDon snn-r rLt.Ilrs. 3 h Tlf.II Ills,IPUaYa x; 177) 5 4RillfS .m..ae al a.r,.hn rna r,an.,.•..,..r T 'tti y�Q( nsn y taTOU my WLL TP a, r� d wsr,rq. v Uxlm TrrLE*4SURA r (AMPS J. Murtha, ESq.�w�t mi 25 {udor CltY Place s u ld2nd Street At United Mathons) " ' SY Nnr York, h.Y. ten. 11017 4 p 1 �`?•.� iz tl ti 1 71va �TR7 F. "Y' .l ke Iwjf f'i i.t+'F' 'f r Y ��}jy",{`'. - - ...«.. . ..w uwrsenattsa tsarsaa LtG am7mMmn-7aY'g7� �ma�aa�sNN i� ���7 10174 ::506 , <, r 3=�7 QfDFJf1L'R[,tsde tine ^Ikl ypd Ncve.tber .elsaem bt'dond eighty-six c ' f t .� C! }/.• LCTWEEM George A. Burrell and Ione E. Burrell, his wife, os tenants in "ne"on and not as tenants by the entirety, residing at 9960 So. Highway AIA, Jessen Beach, Florida 31157 e 2 . e r 11' PftMofdRfrw W%rd Galacveni Associates, a partnershi !, 1 iborn Lane, Nassau Point, Cutchoguo, Ny 11935 p, of 550 ' n V4 I"of tee ammsd paR ';VM AZS"K this the party of tl-fix pan,in CAMidvadsn d 'en t$1x.001----------------------'._ n Lnrfd mme7 of the Uw%a1 Sate$ s C paid by the pant d the atewd pan,dM hereby etwilm.rataae c.ndr gttiwJ■:t mm,the pmry of the messed pmt, tln heirs v totteavxt ast to a!the .l p fary d the t®nd part f-tees•. Y iia \ AIL d6l a •-'ain pkr.Pince w pxrtel of LwW. site the buildings Mi4 impretenemt th, M erMw sitturc, �• 1014 and h'iee is•%e at Nas-au roint, Town of SOutttold, County of Sr! 1 and State of new fr,r,t, shown and designated on Map of Proposed fclk Subdivision, Section P, '!asar'u Pcinr Club :r;yerties, Inc., filed in Lae office 71 the Clerk of a .e County of Suffolk on October 1, 1919 5 au Map No. 'IS; Amended Map of Secticn B, Nassau Point Club O Prol,erties, Inc., filed it the office of the Clerk of the County of [Suffolk un October 21, 1920 as Map No. 753; Amegded Ifap A of Nassau +. Point, filed in the office of the Clerx of t e County of Suffolk on Pnintt16,Club Pro1922 ea Yao No. 156 and Amended Map B of Section B, Nasiau f p fes• Inc., filed in the Office of the Clerk of the ICcunty of Suffrlk 0 September i6, 1921 described as folijws; as Map No. 789, bounded end BEGINNING at a point o„ the northwesterly side of Aborn Lane, distant f evtt, d22 feet southwesterly, when measured along the northwesterly -id, of +4 . "V Aborn Lane, from tFe `01 nEr formed by the t _ •;esterly side of Ab+rn Lane with the westerlyesidetofnNOf a=sauePointnorth- Of ` ,. .- c1fRoad; saiu point or on tileinn also hefny %here the southwesterly side we ter 99. de shown on the ;+ O mettioned nape, intersects the north- westerly aide of Atx,cn Lane] y Si RUNNING THENCE south 541 degrees 42 minutes 00 e e g the: northwesterly aide of At ,rn Lane, 31J.00 {e o"ds Nest' alONg extremity of Aborn Line; to the southwesterly Z HTNCF. south 35 degrees le minutes 00 seconds Ba 't, along tate southwesterly extremity of Atr.,rn bane 25.00 ' fo.merly of MCFnlght; • feet to land now or _- t r.l 7 i t 6 e I NOY:13L SM TI'.ANF-FER TAX COUNTY SUF.OLIC cttlnucd.... ... ..... . ,� 1? J7e 'F v11M p k� '�j'!*) ���hJ4a� �� ,, i 1.1._ '". ryi47i ��]J.�"` r7�;.1. .Pj�•J ..�'. l�t�' .. 1 ,�>K 3�."t'1._ ryj'� 4 �>'"'�f e�.�,>{,i4�,2tk' �f: r ,v 'fl� 'i?.: r 'R.-_jj" T°7 f.W;'f. ✓� ,i4� + ..a4 Ate; ,r----- i TiE14f_E along said last mentioned laird, lthe. {o}1�!lr g (hree 3) ruzses and distances; v c� a South 54 degrees point/ 42 minutes 00 seconds Nest, 7.00 feet to a - -H U) Westerlyalong tl.e coved norths Y . ,., .,)Ind _ rl line of new or formerly of Mcrnight as shown on the abovementione' mala, a tie line course and distance Of Nortl. 81 degrees 23 minutes 00 accords a,at, 247.30 feet to :r points =` Y U) South 54 de^rees 42 minutes 00 seconds West, 120.00 feet to the high water mark of Peconic Bay. TH-XCE along the highwater mark of Peconic Bay, the following two +r (2) tie �:ourses and distances: (11 Korth 48 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds Wert, 251.16 feet to a Point; L Y (2Nor", 60 degrees 23 minutes 40 secont: Vest, 30.U0 feet to the 1 x northwest erly Wlkhead of a canal;' TJIVCE Ncrth 29 degrees 36 minutes 20 seconds East, alcng the uwYir-esterly bulkhead of said oanal, slid pard.• along Lot 108, f vwI GI the abov xrectioned maps, 177 feet to , point on the rhere line a :i,e lagoon, as shown 0:I the abovementioned maps; .k.. THENCE in a general northerly direction a_onq :he shore line of t!e r -t - lagoon, as shovr on the abovementioned ;naps, and alon , .. )09, 110, 111 n, 112 and 113, as shown o1"ze g Lots 108 maps to the southerly a.de of the bridge which crosses heelagooniondat Br}dge ' f Lare, { - - THE',C% Nv.rtheasterl d •'f' - alo,19 the rsoutherly a print on the northerlysideof is e lagoonat thesoutRrate[Iloy r yp ems, c u r^c of Flot , as shown on YaF: No. 7E'?, alrvementinned; } riENCE Ea!lterly alor.g the shore 1i�c of :he lag-on lot C an shown on said 9aP No. 789 and contimringa ongathend ashorelong pllne er o' Che 9, 11 in a genera, southerly direction and along Lota 121 a I'>0, 119, 118, 111, and 107,3the aRovrn,entiorrP10F, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101 and 99 on s 7 A map , to a point where the division line between TA-t!. )9 and lOn intersects the lagoon as sl own on the abOvementioned x1't { 7Tn CE South 44 el-grres 42 minutes 00 seconds West. awr. ntioned divisio, lire, 160 feet to a points along said Laat T PRE24CE So.rth 35 1egrees 18 minutes 00 arfCO➢da East, along the scut Sr^'eterly side of said Lot 99 on tho abovemertioned maps, :40.00 1 feet to the northwesterly side of Abo� Of BF)CINNING. n Lane, at the point or pi ca , It being _nG.ndrd that this conveyance Includes all cf the premises now owned iry the ESTATE OF CHARLES NAMMEP. on Nassau POJ`1t end the grrn'ors , :rein. g 2 } j a yr IiC~ 'i�N�} 6L'f(A Y qr�� f1�Y .+��. i•�, )'l`d' ' r{. �a .r.P+Y.i+ \Fh'.i,.i' l 4 -Jt9 '. # r.. "�, .,h �'� et1_'. '. t .•� ��1" r �' 9:., �4 .. !qr+ �a+�.* " a ter.;..' [p� ';�i1�r'• � .•..� ? a1.�w Fv,ei ,e t f r 4". r i2r r £+v�� Fes• 4��Yl:i la tY ti!r d h Ap yM� rye �jshi kiSiCr��,���"S tth iE �,,ifiT y�i tR aA r w R N k�v may- � � 'lyyy��Ta�.�•+.M r , '�ip�bte ip"y ^.k w, ' i r O�W Fr � •'! . t Y R� lfrrY/ •rM�ti fJ�\. ,R+ �� �fLK I�`1"�a�1 �r ff rr�'.^°t�$rSY' •F•"�. .. - � l.y�l} } ��d i�«'�� � 4♦�1`f' `T a� �I��//,, .a. w 5 'f✓.rY f�J I Y. r� f �, }y+ ✓#fkg � t � �•S� �f ��.�Y a /' }; � � for V ' � •� V4 �. '�!�~'"i Are! 3 R R hWr L ar•'� � .ry�4T'7 � tf- �Y�}" s/�� r� j�.f�j�,'�..r. � }. ti � 3 0 � I '0 !!9 ^ Ul p I tv CD i iA# y SQ PO - r ski ; Z rd - I ' PAi¢eEe F Ax qr- mp dws ou Z I ; 9.3� 1pA2 t SL c ) II t PAL2C04 N �C'o ! ti I va�ec�t .A ,5 ror An PA7RC6L 611 �- � i m o I S. S '4Z'wv. Aborn 5.5484L'kV.in 5.as"/s 'E. - sr.* # MAP OF PROPERry i Scale. 1001= /,$ I SV4AZYB'Y60 PDX j .. �'•/��y �}/y AP /.err AU R_�ALTERATION OR ADWIr NABS spa U. j�ii/I(r.J ' f To m6 su0.vEr B A VIOLATION OF ,. ND7C : �G7 lfLMb6r3 S�IOiVh f T4YVAl .OF aS0<J�"NQLD, h/.'a!� sEouONrms unoN LAW. NEw roaK$ rxE , un .4ed dfld f desl9aefad ea . A CONE$OT 11 S :7 MAP LT "ar6rer/�s /itis " ' rifer to trio is #avww%fsed A`0 rhe T/tJE 6wQnol%tt�r + +,x,,, , 1,,,,, cLAN.s `°"" f%�QQ. I!! s4 f0/�G GQ,tMlfr J O. as ;sar�rerysd,VtIt di 197 : a tt TOeEAYAtDTwE_awv.)ROT BE c �I ,e y� ! r` , t C/erk.V Of �Cs ✓��w 4CGy. �PO ti` ' • ^. DMYTOTIIE ' , Rodar cR : !'o3ri fi'u 1, P ARANras�SONFOR WNOM Twha 745, 7S.i, Nd' 7i9. 1 7 , s MEPAM,ASD QN NB/ENA:E J?iF'_ ` T'n-coMrANr.CAYEWVb¢A. "- t}CQ7t3!'d :Zl7l�d ij Y YJ , �4I(. +, T su nr r GA-Iit 1� IY•'Yt ' Mr1y7 ����\�• ,.;,�'=rtupT ,EM, „i,11 ,0/6,p --- -- -- i,_ {1177—I„L,q�`- - Tv':'. - �. .._. .�.A.. �'^?".Y::. ..^+ <.,�1�`�. :+�..��'•r :::�: r � 4' r° *.:f���t•�✓��.:_.�x�J_-:'.t _It" �T`� � __",i . s' y 1CNPROPOSED SUBDIVISION MAP OF +CCTIUN d. NASSAU PUIN7 CLJB PROPERTIES. rNP. FILE NU.745 FILED, OCTOBER 1. 19/9143.03 SUBDIVISION HAP O; AMENDED MAP 'A' JF NASSAU POINT FILE' NU. 156 Fka, AUGus7 16, 1922 4 IMII +LL411M IICY Y!i M1.8.' T. 11 .1 � •Y.- 6.0 � R p 1� LOT 97 LOT 98 LOT 99 Lor to/ �• T.Y.-10.5�� r O / Y'.6.Y.- 6.6 1 _ / / L / ` VOL L It HErER �� \ �/ O fs/ 1 - // / /// / PART OF LOT 9J REWA I i� Lu 22 / / ----- WA Ib2 / � T.Y. 10. WE L / O.Y.• P. \ _ \ \ i sl POND - VU rER EL.- J.7' mow _ _ - - _ _ _ -__ __ _ _ _ _ - _ _ p91 VC U a �IBORN�2 �c £ - - -_ - _ -� LANE- WA ---- PIVED Y/VE V enrtrH N 54.42'00"E .73 00 "^'•�-�-. __L___ a52 O / /L 2 ml OI LINO Ji / j l5 L 1 j/ It / L15d It ryN£ LFANIw / C LINE OF ORANGE RIBBONS DEL/NEAT/ NO o / 'J.4 � JNfH EI .• A4v,/IOEDGE OF WETLANDS PLACED BY A REPRESENT VE �> u ^ 26.Nd' IRS-i yr'IO< IH1S OFF/CE ON JANUARY 2J. /990i-121 m lQp EDGE OF POND OF DECEMBER IJ, 1999 F.FL.EL.• • -' ! ' � I/ T.1 bV / /� / 150 NE MAN. +n reR rJ H. xw \\\ - / 1r/ AL) �/ --: � 4 O Pru l l 1 � ,✓�/Nri / / f51 EI \ 24.40 9AFA6E 1 �SF ` b 'W �fi 116, wioFT � 46M ss w. 2 z •\ c.e. s ✓ER ,� / 4 AfLG55 ��1 \ _- _ '/ E -.^-033 ••1-). T�/ 777 '' z+ I APRLW X91 • V/F H;�11''nARI f 'Hnl'TJVNFh HIRLFY / be 1 20.2 21.3 ,4RFxw'b \ �\ (/ 12.64 u a:' \ �� p I! IV, \ \ /� O 6vrE. t N 54'42'00"E 2t .OE` Fro, 20.9 �� 21.2� O G6 , \ \ r I I" '{(Ap' NA m I � � / 94ry2XF ♦r(mrAli-) ' F1.1 I \ \ ` \ 12.6 0410m ,V/o SLOM 12 / l 'M W / , GNAHT3OE1 .• $ C T l: In 1• 22 ' $Y�A 44 20.z + �. . ✓Eu AfaA L A6GE 'S'f fl ;'Iq o•M SCJ // n \I 23.44 \ `\ _ _ / ` E 'ELL. )P CS 0 n ARIA O� 21.64 IOL9 \\ e x 20.94 �I 4 / Nrr 2. /x 1 \� / 155-50.048 Ac. / .\ _ _�- EARTN 7:ha .6 20.60 21.60 LJL 156 _L16 _ _ /20 LIL rile rro. - FEM.F /I • LIL ENC i - _ rvE Ew. CUr -Q _ _ _ _ '4VeL1,eE' =2V1 lA F e.le•L Y/RE / O AR/Ve E s L•w Ln 5 54•{3'00"V 719.68 6� LF6 _ _K = "'_`o_w_ n .r / La•5.ff LE 2p•alY. D 156 - �,A\ __ __ _ �_�`�..; -/ r 4•�r . . A�. .p � L "/ST!•/ V'.9rNILI£D AL R:4ArIPl.' AMJr/ail TOA SLBVEY RA^ I I I�,\ i ��� \ 2ss' ^ \ \ -22--f- 'IL S1AAIW A Lrab'N6Ea LAPID ♦WT ,L 'rr. T'rIL ISA VIS.IrION ` e\ / ,6 WC1 IO . 6rJOf VISION L. ]• RE W. YGL(STALE ✓ \ 1 /- I EA'.GAHT1QV >Pa9 LAY. Y \ X22✓ - ��21 - I / /// OXY"$ a =RLVr RE MIDI LL t MIS"wr MAM0 - VIM AN LLNIG. IL OF r 4" YMN! is�-,06iEa SCAL IR rN3D 614E 6Rk.. 6E aPrS/aEFm la lE InL fa MX L. ta. N/F nAR10 d ILSE rROHBONE ciIWASrLrNM T R fACCCWIW A WM rba!I r rIW MIS SUEYEY MA ,lEIARED /N AG"wror'E DOA .AB"PA./S AFIV CME CF /.VAI:TrCE Aaf LAW IM DLRP APO' :D L, T/L- ,M YaK STArt ti ri A S U RUNR'_•: 11 LVO rLRVEYLMr, SAID - 4RrIFlGAifa`NREV.L RW a. :E A~O NLW C IXLIVEr :S ARE•AYED. ANL L HIS IAlS r F aV TIRO L'PPAN. MaEmrd:RrAL AseL•r Aw LEw1A0 rlArrrrBr:av LrarLq/EAEay. 5 ErGI4 OF E'Jl5fr1� LOT LAYGUt� a-rtnFL"r rlPa ARE!nr 'RAMFEMd.E PV AaOrrraw: /Rsrr,✓ raa SHOV:W ON �... AN s✓A66w.ERr a r.6rr. � ' A6 xxr/F: ••,:'I /r nvr Ac ;G rrE Lrrrvxr ae TOPOGRAPHIC M A P M]i! rlrL�:c C/EAE16Vlr aI RI6Wr6`a'GQY AA'£Ci.AG 7nls PRa•El%/ !7E LLCfi�..Vl uF OlE/kNTs fe R!l/K`Lf'A. OF MCQw.m 4 Pkw AAD SFRYfFlm PLY /E "14r� LIE IMIRPEVrr ARE PMVIDEP TO rE"YEM. NOTES: PREPIRED FOR IJ LOT NUMBERS SHOWN HEREON REFER TO SUBDIVISION MAPS OF "R^OPOSED SUBDIVISION SECTION B. NASSAU POINT CLL:` 'PROPERTIES. INC. " FILE N0.745 FILED OCTOBER, I I9/ ' AND H A I'#*R Y C , 8 , JANET ►-J O H N "AMENDED MAP A OF NASSAU,POINT" FILE NO. 155 FILED AUGUST 16, 1922 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFI'E. A'1nL:PM:.:7 NL'AE" =:. 13.90 :ROM .:..TVrY WORK Lull/':C7cOr ✓ANUAL7Y 23. 1990 2J APPROXIMATE EDGE OF RICHT OF WAY SHOWN HEREON !S BALED AAJAICI pp V�1t pL I� I/�1 I FROM SAID FILED SUBDIVISION MAPS. JJ THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AS STATED IN 1 l 1 il- 111 111 IU NA. SSAU POINT A DEED MADE BY NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. 10 \'I ALBERT C. ABORN AND LAWRENCE M, BAI.NBRIDGE MADE MA ' 27. ' Q �J1 �Ly� q TOW OF SOUTK_ L.D 19/9 AND RECORDED MAY JI, 1919 IN THE SUFFOLK COUN'Y o� I ���`V I O I I �e-e' IrJ U� I� , CLERKS OFFICE. SAID EASEMENT EXTENDS OVER A STRIP OF 1 SUFFOLK CQJA � ' LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH ALONG AND ABOVE HIGH WATER Al IRK, .J n WHICH SHALL FORM A COMMON ROADWAY FOR THE BENEFIT .IF11 ALL PERSONS OWNING LANDS ON NASSAU POINT. SCALE : 1 " = 50' 47 ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NATIONAL GEOD.TIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1.929. A^=A = .' . 368 +!- AC-ES JOHN J. RAYNO'.. P.E. 6 '_.S. . P .C. n n / -- CIVIL 01:iNEM-C U �. palk I TO TIE LINES ALONG AYE^.AGE F!IGH WATER CF DEC. 13, 1989 PURVEY-AS SITE RLANNERB , a•� AND APPROXIMATE E^CE OF NASSAU PONT ROAD RIGHT OF WAY 1 DEEN'::L.. ONFEN P.O. e0z 720 JDNN J. RAYNOn T>% MAP NO.: IOCJ-i t6,00-06.07-001 .000 6 OC.3.001 WATER N,LL. R.Y. 11976 MICO 725-7600 LANO BURV=YCR N0. 49316 •PLOT• 1'OPOGR 4PHIC MAP - 9 ;0. 147 PF: 144. '1 5 I ?6-.Jon-90 I^•F' II z AB RN LILEJ OOP NF ARDwT L 9 1 I-ev��G 1-f 2P II I! w LUT 95 PROPOSE[ SUBDIVISION MAP OF SECTION B, NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES. INC. FILEN9.745 FILED( OCTOBER 1. 1919 N 5 -42-00-El 143.03 1 SUBDIVISION HAP OF AHENOED HAP "A" JF NA55Al/ POINT FrLE 4). 196 FILED, AUGUST 15, 1922 CO (D4L 1. ELLInI / c, IEweE1 nM.EEiI t � _ �� KEY MAP I 's. e. : 6:6 v .u.• fi.0 1 1' 1 " = 600' N q y-} NN p 11 LOT 9J LOT 9B LOT 99 LOT 101 lY f- R SCALE: mY1 N `N. T.V,=10.1 YI�IIW.- 6.fi ((( -S ``• YELLIL . -- / f •ice I\ . METER 22 �l G 158 S PART OF LOT 9J EREUAt IN �� 152 / � 22 F r W. 10.E 1 W.- B. Y / POND m` - - -- - - - --- - - - - 7 __ - -- -- - - - - - -- V R -A'OAD) _ uL � 6 PRI A - - __ -_ s (2 `'o DRIVE I� WATER EL J.l' N\ \ _ - _ _ ___ _ _ _ MVED ARIK NYr' N CUY _ - _ _ - _ _ _ '4+ � EARTH54-42-00-Ei �' . � N Q / - _ - O 1 32 O w 94 c.n.fw. 383,00 - 6.00 Zz-- 6 _ O .n 0PINiuo0, /-n //,,,ppp' y � 26.63' � I ' uIRF C215I0 G2 U �l - I''iY LL \ LIG / L rL CU Y DLIG.'D�xix s2 \ 52 MIRE LINE OF ORANGE RIBBONS DELINEATING UPLAND 27�4yPORCH EI e A EDGE OF PLACED BY A REPRESENTATIVE 00 O� THIS OFFICE ON JANUARY 23. 1990 + f ee.• % ' Wmz EDGE OF POND OF DECEMBER IJ l B9 0 N1 / / u ` / 'Y{ �F 6.815. • ISI V.I+ W / y `1 \p IY Rfi' 33.3. 0 ■ .�� V V y f.E. 26. A FENCE LH. av rca P,aI'Ila N � � W l I N7 R G.H. O 'il �' 1.127 ACRES irr W = / PO4Cy O l 1.249 2u'.731 J e f F ACRES N g 2.545 ACRES _ ag. L -- APRON ,SLAB E \� 3 C y > 1 rypy GARAGE 'I R2 N \ I \ O < \ 1.672 ACRES I. HAND ✓n TER (EXCLPOND) y 1 ID 1.1 PNf° p2.. 102.16 Y047FL b1, o.mF�. // 1.616 ACRES \ Yz_i ...... _ o.eo•v. / eQ SITE DATA: ND uER WL 5 54-42'00-W 200. Wr 25 TOTAL AREA: 7.368 x ACRES Yr Izf x_Is 156 �` a; � M1 � zz / 15i'/ y, /�°�a NUMBER OF LOTS: 4 m / O �� b ^ I _ 75 CHRISTOPHER HURLEY AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 1.842 o ACRES N Y �^� V GARAGE Y1 '*. \ III �y.rr„ // � WETLAND AREA: 0.929 xACRES 5 D2\ / x �1 -,4 21 a+ SLIL - 12.fi D:7 f° a 11'1154• 'GO-E 200.00 POND AREA: 0.873 xACRES m= 1� O\ 5 20.9 21.2+ 12.3. FIRE DISTRICT: C UTCHOGUE m 21.2+ 2.447 ACRES Yr tTLri BASIN It 4 12 3 GRATE EL.- POSTAL DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE w 1.4 12.e -+ IU 10.30 0 ti X 22 \ 13.0 % z3l zO.z 2,399 ACRES _ . I ', t SCHOOL DISTRICT. MATTITUCK-CUTCHOGUE H w 21.1 •4+ • \ / W EXCL. 30% SLOPE REA)-- F Ey m n 23.4+ 107.9' \N \� �J F / 1^tennREA OP �m21•e+ � %\ / ZONING DISTRICT: R-40 30% SLOPES` I / 2 20.9 \`> �_ _� ' .. _ - -_- _ �'�;1 155- / V 2 = 0.048 ACRE 1 -- - - o1i�•FxO. 14I1.4� EARN APPLICANT: 7 20.6S uL L ( raeEQ Lim S 5 .43'00- 74. Je G LTL n.rt Fill HARRYG.HOHN EAST 66TH S TREET166 z NEW YORK, NEWYORK 10021 - __- "p y 1 p i I N/F MARIO d ILSE TROMBONE FEB 7 1990 sL PLAPIr!,L- MINOR SUBDIVISION I SKETCH PLAN I NOTES. NOTES: ,I'I PREPARED FOR Il LOT NUMBERS SHOWN HEREON REFER TO SUBDIVISION MAPS OF "PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SECTION B. NASSAU POINT CLUB (1) ALL LOIj',;AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE PRHARRY G • d JANET HOHN PROPERTIES, INC. " FILE NO.745 FILED OCTOBER 1. 1919 AND "AMENDED MAP A OF NASSAU POINT" FILE NO. 155 FILED (2) UTILITII S AVAILABLE ALONG NASSAU POINT ROAD AND ABORN LANE. AUGUST 15. 1922 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. ; j SITUATE PREPARED, JANUARY 26, 1990 FROM SURVEY 27 APPROXIMATE EDGE OF RIGHT OF WAY SHOWN HEREON IS SCALED (3) WATEPSUPPLY TO BE FROM INDIVIDUAL WELLS tt� v--? °•' e5' NORI( COMPLETED, JANUARY 23, 1990 FROM SAID FILED SUBDIVISION MAPS. 'i YS� ' �t jqi� (4) INDIV14lALSEPTICSYSTEMSTOBEPROVIDED, SUBJECTTOSUFFOLKJI THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AS STATED IN COUNTY DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH SERVICES APPROVAL. . APR 12 1990 A DEED MADE BY NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. TO gg ALBERT C, ABORN AND LAWRENCE M, BAINBRIDGE MADE MAY 27, u 1919 AND RECORDED MAY 31, 1919 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I� W ' CLERKS OFFICE, SAID EASEMENT EXTENDS OVER A STRIP OF TO','JN f LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH ALONG AND ABOVE HIGH WATER MARK, SUFFOLK COUNTY , N . Y . J PSE OF NEI, PDr WHICH SHALL FORM A COMMON ROADWAY FOR THE BENEFIT OF ry� '� /pgyNO ALL PERSONS OWNING LANDS ON NASSAU POINT. SCALE : 1 " = FJO' 43 ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC ir- L^,-{l, •� `." n} VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929, Al JOHN J. RAYNOR, P.E. 6 L.S. , P.C. SURVEYORS CIVIL ENGINEERS BITE PLANNERS fL lu 9 • �. 4qd 7A% MAP NO.. 1000-118,00-06.00-001 .000 8 003.001 DEE6FIELD GREEN P.O. BOX 720 1p WATER MILL. N.Y. IIW6 15151 726-7000 LAND SURVEY NO. 49318 III; •PLOT• TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - 9[0.141 PF: 144501 531 26-Jon-90 12453 PM / 1445-1 i N/F CHARLES 6 I I MAUDE B. HAMMER 1 PART OF L07 93 ' .1. LOT 96 ,Y PROPOSED SUBDIVISION MAP OF SECTION B. NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES. INC. FILE NO. FILED, OCTOBER 1. 1919 N '42'GO'E 143.03 SUBDIVISION MAP OF AMENDED HAP "A" OF NASSAU POINT FlLE,NO. 156 FILED, AUGUST 16, 1922 4 .1LIMtM.M NONAET ry]N,.ET ALWIIIT 1 ,I11Ilyl /S''G1TE ccs LOT 9B LOT 99 LOT 101 R. �f LAWN LOT 97 0/' to / LTL r' ` •i "'/ ` lEit ELECT. I O 1521 fEIER lC-1i C-I Z PART OF LOT 93 REWATNtNC1l iS,�\\ IF2 ;� , O// y PALL "-X4:'.11 �� �II POND ISIS E, ---- - 1 --- - -_ORIF-- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - --ODRIVT II ABORN �r62E EARN- - - _-_ _-_ __ QI --- - LA7NEw_. L PAVED ORTVE N� Q -- _ _ N 54'42'40'E 11,30.00 � i sO / O 0 O� c �ltN�o'� / `� / n.rroLEI. LIL L4 LIL LLL GUY 0 ISE D 168 I6F E.32•V. LINE OF ORANGE RIBBONS DELINEATING UPLAND / -Lim 27 OU C 5 15P VIRE I EE y / / L� EDGE OF WETLANDS PLACED BY A REPRESENTATIVE PP q p OF THIS OFFICE ON JANUARY 23. 1990 w EDGE OF POND OF DECEMBER 13. 1989 'OHIM VAI£R PUDW Amum III lV�'• / lr6T / WE Y APRON ,.atuOy / / yl _If 4GARAGE /1 / VAITR a.IN.GHFNC SMI y� o.•e•v: S 54'42'GO'Y 200.00 uRESNY rop L7/ W 041 \�• 16!6% ^Sym roMp / � y g DOW. 9 APROY N/F RICHARD A CHRISTOPHER HURLEY GARAGE gg 9.76•E. I'�N 54'42'00'E 200.00 Pro. Ob \�� \\ WIRE6 L � SA // O GAYBASIN cv t\ 11 . YELL \- O•N W uELL,OO E° Ell n 107.9 3 \ Nyr \ 166-6 O Sv / n / 1.1 PIPE 0.19N. I Z LLIIIIINM __- •' EAR1H`\ � _ __ J 0 0LTL 1660 --_- - - -_-_ LUL ui¢ aro. FENCE �� f - - �� rlrE rl luY O __ _ LIFI\E __ /I'A (F LITE - --- / l Ibb fEN� !.L•E. VIRE LTL _ _ _ '`.p..t.'IA - - -- I 6LIW La 554'43'00'Y 714.68 Ibb _ pl.IpE1p CM. E J rlrE Fro. 166 6 _ 4.2'!.6 LI dNw✓✓lrr_`_...yyy"",,.111}//f �' /� /' pF�tK DLIL r - __ 0 16611 / WAUl]RHIZEO ALIER.ATIW m ADDITIW TO A SIRVEY MAP SSARIM A LICEV6ED LAM SLEVS)IN S 51 15 A VIO.ATIW 1 / OF SECTTW 7809, SIBOIVISIW 2. OF M AEW YDRR SrA IS fOLCATTW LAY. ON.Y Gri^IE6 FAm ME M191Y AL OF MIS SLRVEY MARAFO YTM AN MIOIML W ISE LAM SWVEN3P'S E16CSSED 6EAL m 11AID SEAL 6I M O IDSMD M M VALID ISLE CmlE6. N/F MARIO 6 ILSE TROMBONE LERrTFTGTIOV6 IMTCAT80/ERELIV STWIFY Mor MIS"WY WAS PREPARED IN ACCO0104M£YIN TIE EYI61IM LYRE OF PRACTICE Fm LAO Swwm ADOPTED EY TAE AEY VO&' BTAIE ASSDCIATIM OF PMiEbBlOVAL LAM surl•E12M5. SAID CRTTFICArTW6 ROLL A111 TO ME PS?tSCY Fm ~ TAE SI TS PREPARED. AM W HIS SSFOLF N TIE TITLE CLYMANY. SOVRMWML ASSWY AM LEMTM fMr1WrIW LISIFO AE.I 2lrrlFlG rrOVS ARE MT TRAAS•ETASLE ro ADDIrIWAL INSTINrIWs m SwSSOAB r WT,mrs. M( NrTFImTIW /6 MALE AS TO DE E.YISYSMS m MAP O F SURVEY I•YVI-EXTSTEME OF IDMIFlIr6 OR AI'TZ M MIS P.ro'ERTY. TIE LOCATIWS OF EASEfI m FIDYIIS'O"YAY OF RECORD AM SMYN AM CERTIFIED O Y IF COTES D' I)E IMIRL1ENro ARE PROVIDED M DE 5 ata PREPARED O NOTES: U L07 NUMBERS SHOWNHEREON REFER 70 SUBDIVISION MAPS OF HARRY G , a JANET HOHN "PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SECTION B. NASSAU POINT CLUB li PROPERTIES. INC. " FILE N0.745 FILED OCTOBER 1, 1919 AND "AMENDED MAP A OF NASSAU POINT" FILE NO. 156 FILED AUGUST 15, 1922 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. 9iTUATE 21 APPROXIMATE EDGE OF RIGHT OF WAY SHOWN HEREON IS SCALED SURVEYEDE JANUARY 23, 1989 REVISED( MAY 7, /990 (ADD 7/EL/NES, ONLY( FROM SAID FILED SUBDIVISION MAPS. NASSAU POINT 31 THIS PROPERTY 15 SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AS STATED IN --1.-••"�T�11�� `` A DEED MADE BY NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. TO �• u-u L� ALBERT C. ABORN AND LAWRENCE M. BAINBRIDGE MADE MAY 27, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Il�u�y 1919 AND RECORDED MAY 31, 1919 /N THE SUFFOLK COUNTY �p 19AV 10 1990 CLERKS OFFICE. SAID EASEMENT EXTENDS OVER A STRIP OF SUFFOLK COUNTY , N . Y . _ LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH ALONG AND ABOVE HIGH WATER MARK, SCALE: 1 = 50' LO", P��-"^" i�`''� WHICH SHALL FORM A COMMON ROADWAY FOR THE BENEFIT OF LO} :,^ ALL PERSONS OWNING LANDS ON NASSAU POINT. LAP 47 THIS PROPERTY 15 ALSO SUBJECT TO A RIGHT OF WAY FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AS STATED IN A DEED MADE BY BARBARA AREA = 7 . 368 +/- ACRES ABORN PECKHAM TO MARIO AND ILSE TROMBONE MADE AUGUST • JOHN J. RAYNOR, P .E. L L.S. • P.C. °I, "'� Y 15. 1974 AND RECORDED AUGUST 1B. 1974 IN THE SUFFOLK [ TO TIE LINES ALONG AVERAGE HIGH WATER OF RIGHT O WAY mvLL ENOINEEee ^� COUNTY CLERK'S OFF/CE /N LIBER 7597 A7 PAGE 286. SAID AND APPROXIMATE EDGE OF NASSAU POINT ROAD RIGHT OF WAY ] ' euRYEYane SITE PLAw Rs � RIGHT OF WAY EXTENDS OVER THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY IN FAVOR OF MARIO AND ILSE TROMBONE 115 SHOWN ON A TAX MAP NO. : 1000-118.00-06.00-001 .000 6 003.001 • DEEILFIELD GRESN P.O. BOX 720 do'Idi'°.1�.aASxIDR" SURVEY MADE BY RODERICK VAN TUYL. P.0. DATED AUGUST 9, 1974. VAIER MILL. N.Y. 11975 1618] 726-7600 LAND SURVEYOR N0. 49316 -PLOT- SURVEY MAP - 9 [0. 141 PF, 144501 fill 26-Jan-90 IE168 PM / 1446-1 1 FRL5 I I UD£ B. AR R \ 1 PAT L i9 BOT 96 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION MAP OF SECTION B. NASSAI/ POINT CLJB PROPERTIES, INC. FILE NOJ15 FILED, OCTOBER 1. 1919 N At •42'OO�E 143.03 SUBDIVISION HAP 01- AMENDED RAP "A" OF NASSAU PJINT FILE NO. 155 FILED: AUGUEr 16, 1922 AL 1. uulw f IYM NET �S. \ 5.6 .R.• 6.0 Q 7p 7 UN R F11 LOT 97 LOT 96 LOT 99 LOT TO/ U.•I2:8 IE1 - r - WELL ZIEPT. 2 / ,•/. ` i`` /_h TER O / I \ �JLU 1 V PART OF LOT 9J - RE AL It L IN �\ • 152 / \ -- - / r-I I ' ol III// _ 1 � POND - A NATER FL.- J.7' BORNE isc E /_ _ _ _ _ _ rv[ N� 11 ruv _� �__ �'��_�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Y N 54.42.00•E 73. oo _ -- LANE tir __L___ PAVED O.R/VE /N52O / ' - \ m n rro. / t%c - _ i O aol It as 15, W LINE OF ORANGE RIBBONS DEL INEATINC JPLANG o. i� , J% ) Y 152 b I 115 LIL CUY LiAxlxa l o /�? /.4 ARCH EI .• cu -- /5e Y/Rf 9.oz•e. O OCE OF WETLANDS PLACED BY A REPRESENTATIVE' / / JRCH,• \J1 1 //' VlRFi2fi B / / A bex•°• / P / Wia EHISDGE OFFICE ON JANUARY 23. /990 / /' / X24 ` 1ti /J E e ----------- EDGE � EDGE OF POND OF DECEMBER I3. /989 � 4E�1 °• / / �\ l pe I \ � / / / F.FL.EL.• dh.n6' �., C y A mw JArem P 2 � i d,H. C' WANTE A $�D U 1vI1�11\/ CCN rOY e\\`'�•1Lp / / `JyI1\ I f/N)T / I A\ O r/ APNuW /SI4. EI \ 1i ` �(•�/ / V' `A/KJAI ��n ,SF ( 92- r PJY w/o weT •.Y�•� L\ \�.. .. __ U2- a S n - O 5 54• • •00"Y 200. r F/ S fff / DO \ I 22- \ 154. 2 V/F &I. AHd d -HHISTJPHEh HUHLEY E Re6E 1 20.2 \ _ 12,6 o.m•L " \� o.re•E. \B N 54.42'00"E 2 .OD ;� n / h / AH/LL'Y oihlL'iL tq ♦a. *o as&OF 21.24 D rA \ '� 11.3 e f : / 21.24 \ \ e \� \ _ •6 \ \ 1 z .D cur 11.4 g2,2XP fl'�IWALP) �\ \`�YIRES 1Y 1 / \\ CAT&H BASIN F1f�.i�1. GRATE El .- W ID Y 22 , 4. 20.2 t . JELL AT1BA t Af4wA *ft? I ® re R.30 �I 20.4, 1 07.9 I ^ /19eoM! JELL �\ / Altsh Op xl IO L x2 W.9+ .1 \\ fr� / Nrr V, 0.048 Ac. n Atlnlxln _ EARm L'F. ):4 D.B21.fi -llE _ _ npE rro. FENCE / FlPE FID. COY - - 2Q L/L 2..'; VIRE - __ - _ - 22 / i5s FEN _ -� L O - aY)YE .15s 6eLll6 \ \ L i-' "- OL1E 1565--�T 3-00-V7I 4.5B e��'itb 2•S.OF Lf i- nVF rw. z.er•e. ACnMtAG1Ci35 7D LOT / GIN 8:' 8Y N.!y, er erisravy IARTy DRJYE fPY4UIMMf1FB ALTE.RATrX/01 AOIER,T EA A 5 A VI L r �� \ \ _ / - . ;J6 O w SEE A LIlEN�J LAN' 9EYEYM'B BELL !s A VluUJIS ` //�� \ \ v / tK'8ECt1a 1KI3. EC9DIY/d(S E. S I!E FEV YMR 5rA IS mrw rta GAY. WITH N •IEB=1 IIS aTICINLL OF MIS sfgYFr WITH AN M/Slx= A IIF LIED ECe", AD VA FD TRUED S(AL ar - !N(ED eEAt psc: eE cawrae5.-a ro Be vara rALe cB•/cs. VA- fF ATCV I IMfa•IRB /FRES IRS INAT mIs'EAFYEY N/F MARIO 6 /LSE TROMBONE VAS MEFATED AACCQMNRE Ylm IIF EXf6TlEW CSA S SIAM A FLM rlm OIEYEI'S AIXMIID LfirA I/E AtY Y S. sArE tm ry fiP OF FRa�m INS p LAM BUPVEYMS. B4ID mIrriSWfWFIa6 MEPAWlILL AND ro ITE FERNY O 7 C TI IC SLtlfVEY /B ME AA AM S HIS MIR I ro fIE T/N.E Ca'IAN. LL F /� �T GUVERAIENI:V. AffiMY Aid)LEMIA@ /ABrllUf/aV LISIEs /EREBV. S�I ETGI� O f�7 6VISVD LOT LQYV V J OR rlFfal r/u'w ARE,Mr )RAABFERABLE roAMtrfaWL /ABTfM?law SK S BIAA$iBENr 04.1 T'B. (YRr:FlC IEI r5 AY.S AS ro fIE EA'lBIFJ,CE M yWO � A9Y-ENf?` O„LAL=Wa a{R/sHrAAaVI-HAY RIGH I-O m!5 Ma'AAA °`LfA OUTF OF f]ISY IF a, a Ep,a�_Y"` TOPOGRAPHIC M A P O�Rc'-CBIB AAE gpYN A/U gIV ThEEB qY,r IF L1YlEB p� ME l:RTRLIEYro.::E ML'I.GED ib RF NAkFYa. NOTES: PREPARED FOR 1) LOT NUMBERS SHOWN HEREON REFER TO SUBDIVISION NAPS OF "PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SECTION B, NASSAU POINT CLUB 'PROPERTIES. INC. " FILE NO.745 FILED OCTOBER 1. 19/9 AND HARRY G I JANET HOHN "AMENDED MAP A OF NASSAU.POINT" FILE NO. 156 FILED AUGUST l5. 1922 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. PnEPMED, ✓X 2Y ':RY 26, 1990 FROM 3UR:EY NORM COHPLETE_'r ✓ANUARY 23, /990 RI APPROXIMATE EDGE OF RIGHT OF WAY SHOWN HEREON IS SEALED SITUATE FROM SAID FILED SUBDIVISION MAPS. JI THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AS STATED .'N NASSAU POINT A DEED MADE BY NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES. INC. ;D ALBERT C. ABORN AND LAWRENCE M, BAINBRIOGE MADE MAY 27, 1919 AND RECORDED MAY 3/, 19/9 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CLERKS OFFICE. SAID EASEMENT EXTENDS OVER A STRIP OF LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH ALONG AND ABOVE HIGH WATER NARK. SUFFOLK COUNTY , N . Y . / WHICH SHALL FORM A COMMON ROADWAY FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL PERSONS OWNING LANDS ON NASSAU POINT. 4) ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NATIONAL GEODE rIC SCALE: I " = 50e .: JOHN J. P.AY`L VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929. AREA = 7 . 368 +/- ACRES BUBYEYORB CIVIL L..::E:ERS BIT[PLnNNERE P.E. 6 L.S. , P.C. 0 I TO TIE LINES ALONG AVERAGE HIGH WATER OF DEC. 13. 1969 , ^ AND APPROXIMATE EDGE OF NASSAU POINT ROAD RIGHT OF WAY 1 V -a" "' 05ERPIELO GREEN P.D. BOX r20 JOUR J. RATAX MAP NO.: 1000-118,00-06.00-001 .000 6 003.001 WATER Fill ILL. N.Y. Ii97fi t.O. NO. 4=8 LAND 2URYEYOR N0. 4E -PLOT- TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - 9[0, 14IPF' 144501 631 26-Jan-90 12,53 PM / 1445-1 d I I a m Z *BR0Q' a ARDE B.PAT L I =P 6 LOT 96 /RUr'/.'SEL Sl/HCI✓1?/JN ,-rnF OF SECTION' c. Nn;SAF'UlNI CLUB PROPERT/ES. INP. FILE N0.145 F/LEO. OCTOBER 1, 19/9 N 54-42-00-El 143.03 1 9JBDIV15ION MAP OF AMENDED MAP 'A" JF NASCA!/ PJINT FILE NJ. IsF FILEL: AJOl/ST 1E. /J�c AL I" T I.LIMI 1 \ \ _ / MM SIGH.GEI KEY AP -T.TI b. 5.6 \ J.• F.0 4, °^ � 7 -'s yN� RR1` \ LOT 97 LOT 98 � 'i LOT 99 LOT 101 SCALE : 1 " = 600' 10.5 vEIL LlC N •• r` � z2 �` REM R LLL I IETER FETA rN S PART OF LJi 9J 4 WAL . 151 / 22 .U. 10.` F a 85.00 �\ u.- R. / rl OND \ \G •".'-`.i ' �' ---�2' '_J--I '2A \---- --- - - - -- _ + _ PRIVATE ROAD / \ ------- VA _ _ 1\ 11 vArER = J. \ \� Al\ ls� E ms_ "- -.__^' ,A- 1,- -- - ----' ---- - a- -- L/�/VE- -- - - - --- - --_PAWO N 71 PAVED 0.Pf VE as rurwlqr FARFH _ _ N 54-42-00•E Nrr.` / 363.68 t2366.32 zaLINE OF ORANGE klBBJNS UEL INERT/N. PLANG o t•N. i 6 LIL CUY27.4;, 2� PJRTH EI 2 GU✓ ee \ elurREEDCE OF UETLANOC PLACED BY A REPRES JlVE 6U r ` 26.bd' / JrRFiUE rNfs OFF/Cf ON JAN(/ARY 2J. /990 - / I \ /Wm Z d EDGE OF POND OF DECEMBER IJ, 1999 2E.9M33.], FENCE'A TER P p� , / ' o / NON' 4 OE S.F z3, OF 's Cr / 1.989 ACRES 2.393 ACRES - aa, _ nPRuv F�LA e Fl1.534 ACRES . - 7.975 ACRES `f'10• (EXCL. POND) OARACE (EXCL. \ / O� ( ) / \ 1.515 ACRES �/ \ c i 1B 1.1 \ nn p 'A TER 1.938 ACRESPOND 1\\ (UPLAND) '\ OP J (UPLAND) oma+ -17' \162.15 D�1• / / c.n.rw. /O��/ /�O m \ \ uoa9ED Yz-- .A:•..' \ o:mv: / / Q / c`v? SITE DATA i C.E. uLp WW �\ 25' yA o.w•v. S 54.42'00"Y 200. Guy - 25• tiq• v s / / P TOTAL AREA: 7.368± ACRES m m - NYr / �� / y�`' NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 Z-1 I[o r5e 630.60 91 i _- ` .,` 22 /5f. ^�{ / ,O g T / j °R \ -----� b'S �J \ ."° / �R6~ AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 2.456± ACRES 75 i- 1e Ate• 27'u - � ,9✓ pry. �] `-� / 'J WETLAND AREA: 0.056 + ACRES 2 ---- N/f R/ ARO d CHR/STOPNER HURLEY � 7 N � j 16540± S.F. / Y� ' c m -_ o .. 4TH POND AREA: 0.873± ACRES m a a cARME / y \ y/ / /~A/ Iw - m - °r / p `yo / FIRE DISTRICT: CUTC HOGUE Y Wim+" Z zi.0 / tIt \\ \- \/ 12.5* o:ii n IN 54• '00'E \ .00 / SII 34 rio. �j POSTAL DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE m 20.9 m 21.2+ EA %SE \ F 21.2* z � . �` \ N` \ l / 'TRES Vrr / SCHOOL DISTRICT: MATTITUCK-CUTCHOGUE 2.447 ACRES \-/ OO I'� / d CA TOR eAsm ' m 1.A imI `\\ \\ \\\ \ I1.d* 12,6 12a* I J // / / ORATEOEL.- ZONING DISTRICT R-40 �0 w 1.1 22 ze•** z0.2 * 1 , ✓ELL 2.399 ACRES 1° e* / ` / •M * 23.4 `� \ (E%CL. 30% SLOPE REA)\ /107. vLL• } / 1. yAAREA OF 21.5* \ \\ J \_�� _/ 2Q.9, I If 155-5 a \ = 3 .0 SLOPES= I�,"u' \\ - j / INC. 0.048 ACRE 1 \ ` -� // / .l.e w. / _ r�v.�.lI _ - EARTH lQ�l- _� � Y5/( / a:ii•N: 20.6®L/L 21.fi® LLL /56_ -11Qn VE Ao CUY -0 - _ _ 'd° rL � p1�•:O. ��22 FENCE . \y 156 F 2.1e•.. GORE _ _ _ I. APPLICANT: E E _ rt u¢ LrL 5 54.43'00'Y , 714.5�/e uL --`'r= _- __ _ - , 0 1,55 OF LIM PI.E rw. 156 HARRY G.HOHN or°ur°i ° 200 EAST 66TH STREET 156 0/1/ / NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021 N/F MARIO d ILCE TROMBONE MINOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN NOTES: NOTES: ' PREPARED FOR 1) LOT NUMBERS SHOWN HEREON REFER TO SUBDIVISION MAPS OF ' "PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SECTION B. NASSAU POINT CLUB (1) ALL L01TAREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. HARRY G . JANET HORN PROPERTIES. INC. " FILE NO.745 FILED OCTOBER 1, 1919 AND "AMENDED MAP A OF NASSAU POINT" FILE NO. 156 FILED (2) UTILffIES AVAILABLE ALONG NASSAU POINT ROAD AND ABORN LANE AUGUST 16, 1922 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. PREPARED, JANUARY 25. 1990 FROM SURVEY 2) APPROXIMATE EDGE OF RIGHT OF WAY SHOWN HEREON IS SCALED (3) WATER SUPPLY TO BE FROM INDIVIDUAL WELLS. SI TUATE IIORK COMPLETED, JANUARY 23, 1990 FROM SAID FILED SUBDIVISION HAPS. NASSAU POINT (4) INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC SYSTEMS TO BE PROVIDED, SUBJECT TO SUFFOLK REVISED: JANUARY 4, 1991 JI THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AS STATED IN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES APPROVAL. A DEED MADE BY NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. TO ALBERT C. ABORN AND LAWRENCE M, BAINBRIDGE MADE MAY 27, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1919 AND RECORDED MAY J1, 1919 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY 1 CLERKS OFFICE. SAID EASEMENT EXTENDS OVER A STRIP OF SUFFOLK COUNTY , N . Y . 1E of NE,v LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH ALONG AND ABOVE HIGH WATER MARK. � WHICH SHALL FORM A COMM �pON ROADWAY FOR THE BENEFIT OF .JI'11� - ,> NDS•.\�- ALL PERSONS OWNING LANDS ON NASSAU POINT. SCALE : 1 " = 50' 0 j 4) ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929, JOHN J. RAYNOR, P.E. 6 L.S. . P.C. ', � `"•� rti CIVIL ENO1NEfR6 SURVEYORS SITE PLANNERS ` • LA IVI �• -� • TA% MAP N0. 1 1000-118,00-06.00-001 .000 6 003.001 DEEI(TIELO MUM P.O. RQ% 72D oma J. RAYNm VAIN MILL. N.Y. 11976 MIS) 726-75M LAND SURVEYOR NO. ASOIe -PLOT- TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - 9 [0. 14] PF: 144501 531 26-Jon-90 12.53 PM / 1445-I I m I Z AB RN LA E o O OP I R U P a F C s 1 UDE B. MAM j I yP a I \ y 1 PAT L T � III I I I�I =P n l� LOT 96 FHll l-F llGLM-LIr.' ,'At JF =Ei T1✓// c. 114 '-A IJIVT OD19 PROPERTIP?. IN". FILE N4J4F EILEL, UCTUSFR I, l9ly N 54-42-00-E 143.03 1 sJRPI4I�IJN MAP of AMEVJFL MAP -n' /F NA-A I PJIVr F¢F NJ. I�f FILE,: A /a P'F II. IJ., KEY MAP b. s.5 a.- L .0 +1+6 m N I 1 J�}\\ uN P,P? \ yr v7 or y or vv or m! SCALE : 1 " = 600' T.4.-10.5\I \` MEI L - I I It 0 I5. 1 m - l F I hAHI OF L 91 A = ;5� S L HEAL / .- i __-2P -� _ U. 10.E IT1 POND (25' PRIVATE ROAD) _ UHrv- __ _ - - - -- - -- - - IIA TER EI .- J. , \ \,� N /Q(`. E - _ ,W++_w�w•E-`^-*^_- .w.;.L_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ L� E^ _ _ -PA_ uR/VE-\ \52 O -V ccA WIY -� EARTH - - ___ LAN _ N 54.42'00'E J _ � O NYTs 3 -� -_.- -- -_ - -- - -- 363.68 / / '.6 - _- , O Nn,O 366.32 __za--- / r.n.Fro. '� O\ .M F•N, tIL /It i t l[ L(L cur p m I I Op� o INn I �\ l \lc. / 15_ 'UNE / i:ez•u: / y. / ^' O LINE OE ORANGE RIBBONS DEL INEATIN' IPLANL p• )I"• 27.4 - �P]RCH {y I Ex�f JY' WETLANDS PLACEi BY A HEPRESENTArIVF 6 / / ( 21 �[_ f.' / .Y/' AHF -ab THI5 OFFICE ON IANUARY ,2. 1990 d / °p W Z � EOCE OF PUNG JF uECEMBER IJ, 19R9 -�� �� / � (+� '/ � I -•a� / � � / / / H / / �LE. 6 � aa.e� � � � � T/ � //�4'`• y - � _ l IFEN/E HAI. ArER t xw 1 w L-I J.H.v H __ / � �� (\NON-USE ARp7A ?, O �/ /pO pO \29 460 S.F/ 0 t /'��� PyrCN D X23 3� ANTE Nn/ '� / ��� r ✓1 !.ibT io I 1 l� _I ] v a- nPRUN b F - 1.249 ACRES ���� 0 1.247 ACRES 3672 ACRES �4.vow - \ @ y (EXCL. PONS) y 2.801 ACRES 2 - J N HATE w up A \ 1.239 ACRES / y f @ (EXCL. PONS) \ p c HAM +A TER 2.753 ACRES ..� (UPLAND) ♦R' 0( J UPLAND D2 -17' -- \ y1• / c.M.Fro. (UPLAND) SITE DATA i - \ \ 182.15 vOmEO ( / p.mv. W 3 i C.E. _vER % A 25' h S 54•42'DO'Y 200- 5' � - ` R9' Y{,eEs / / a,P�- TOTAL AREA: 7.368+ ACRES _ NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 630.60 154. ,�Y / �p g R z2 -/ \ v° / AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 2.456± ACRES __ - 4,g& 2 , J75 - Z � �_ 9 9 N/F RIOHARL' d �-HRISTOPHER HURLEY / / XWETLAND AREA. 0.056 i ACRES \ 16540± S.F.` 4� vPOND AREA: 0.873- ACRES m Ui "\4kt � iY y \, �-r / �'L� / y2\0 / FIRE DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE w 20.2 __ xa.GG . \ n. /m LT \ /� •.Y••z\ a IN 54• '00'E .00 �/ POSTAL DISTRICT: CUTCH OGUE 0156 r 20.9 m21.2/ CA \ ♦ \ II.Ot I D / m 2$.2 i . \ \ \ \ \ �� N _ \ RES LWvrr / SCHOOL DISTRICT: MATTITUCK-CUTCHOGUE i �I0 \ ao 1 ` \\ 14\ 2.447 ACRES rv0 1 / d CA rw BASIN ZONING DISTRICT R-40 \ 1- \ \ '\ // GRATE EI .- m 1.1 - A XV _J 12.6 12.3E 'I x 22 23�.+ \ zo.2 Y . dELL 2.399 ACRES la.e, l0 ^ w 2i.1 20,4+ 1107`8' \ \ `� \\ (EXCL. 30% SLOPE REAS AREA OF " rvwvvvr 21.5, g 20,9 30% SLOPES= 0.041 ACRE w IST EAR) 15_ \I nb ]•� .5 20.5® 21.fi® LLL l56 - .115 A ` - _ _ � rlrE Fro. FEM]E �/ \ / APPLICANT: L/L NLE - FlAE Fro. CUY _-0 \ 2D !/L C z.l!'L YLR£ O Mll !'!56 x.z• .ff 1 EB P rIFE Fro. ff urc isb B 54.43'00'Y . 714.65 14 L'6 -`_ `-" O_ '_A HARRY G. HORN 200 EAST 66TH STREET 22-trs� I N LIL p 1 / NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021 N7F MARIO d ILSE TRUMBONE MINOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN NOTES: NOTES+ PREPARED FOR 1) LOT NUMBERS SHOWN HEREON REFER TO SUBDIVISION MAPS OF "PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SECTION B, NASSAU POINT CLUB (1) ALL )T AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. HARRY G , b JANET HORN PROPERTIES, INC. " FILE N0.745 FILED OCTOBER 1, 1919 AND "AMENDED MAP A OF NASSAU POINT" FILE NO, 155 FILED (2) UTILIi'IES AVAILABLE ALONG NASSAU POINT ROAD AND ABORN LANE. AUGUST 15. 1922 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. PREPARED, JANUARY 26, 1990 FROM SURVEY 2) AFFROXIMA TE EDGE OF RIGHT OF WA SHOWN HEREON IS SCALED (3) WATI�R SUPPLY TO BE FROM INDIVIDUAL WELLS SITUATE NORI( COMPLETED, JANUARY 23. 1990 FROM SAID FILED SUBDIVISION MAPS. NASSAU P O INT(4) INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC SYSTEMS TO BE PROVIDED, SUBJECT TO SUFFOLK 1 I REVISED: JANUARY 4, 1991 JI THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AS STATED IN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES APPROVAL. JAN - J 1991 A DEED MADE BY NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. TO REVISED: JANUARY 7, 1991 ALBERT C. ABORN AND LAWRENCE M, SAINBRIDCE MADE MAY 27. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1919 AND RECORDED MAY 3I, 1919 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE. SAID EASEMENT EXTENDS OVER A STRIP OF i' SUFFOLK COUNTY , N . Y . Y LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH ALONG AND ABOVE HIGH WATER MARK. .(� O' Nc , WHICH SHALL FORM A COMMON ROADWAY FOR THE BENEFIT OF 5�A r I ALL PERSONS OWNING LANDS ON NASSAU POINT. A, SCALE: 1 " = 50' °a r4- - _� it ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929. 1 ]7 >♦ JOHN J. RAYNOR, P.E. 6 L.S. , P.C. � •-`/'''I CIVIL ENGINEERS - B011VEYOR6 SITE PLANNERS • TAX MAP NO.: 1000-118.00-06.00-001 .000 8 003.001 OEERFIELD DPEEN P.O. BOX 720 I,NRAY3& '1 4ATER MILL. N.Y. 1:9]fi (516] 726-]500 LAND Jr6LWVEYOMNO. 9ZII6 -PLOT- TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - 9I0. 147PF: 144501 531 25-Jon-90 12,53 PI', I i I, I, 6 > m i AS R LA E O I o OC l I� 1 Qo.= 1 F C ARLI65 i UDE B. AM R I \ ¢ J 1 PA T L T 9 \I m qyC =P 6 LOT 96I /RJA,/GEL S(/BD/VISION MAP OF SECTION tl. NA SSA!/ POINT CLUB PROPER7IE°rr' /NG FILE NO.115 FILED, OCTOBER 1. /9/9 N 5W-42-oo-rl 5W-42-o0-6l143.03I 1 SUBDIVIS/ON MAP OF AMENDED MAP "A" JF NASSAU POINT FILE INU. I5F FILEL', AUGUST 15. 1922 wN �T wwv� ` T�.�.I ' � KEY MAP mss. e. : \ ° 6 ° UN N6- SCALE : 1 " = 600' H I sem} UN p p P \ LOT 97 Lor 98 Lor 99 Lor lol mM1 N d \ T.V.=Ia.S 1 y`�R. m N r LL i20/ t/ WELL LIG Z •% "T p.\ lIETER _22 S ✓ I PART OF LOT 9JAREUAG LN �� • LIL 1F / - _ \ �!� J 22 / .W. 10.E r� _ __ m A1 WATER El .- J. /SII _ POND �--- - - - __ - - u tI\ "� N 54.42'00"E `• la II \ \ _ _ --(25' PRIVAT -ROACI pR1VE_ 1 \ r5e £-� - L.,NE- - PA1xn oRrvc rur cARrH LIL It q p� p IMO \\ I5J L IR l5L /52 YLRE LPANIw o LINE OF ORANGE RIBBONS DEL/NEAT/NC JPLAND p• �x• 27.4 JPJROH EI \I / 'Ll'.u✓ -- \ e 6 A LK•v / Q. / �N1 EDGE OF WETLANDS PLACED BY A REPRE^ENTArIVE 0 / j � 24=6.5X / ✓/RFi26 \ SII \ \ / / ` / O I OF THIS OFFICE ON JANUARY 23. 1990 R 6 Wm Z d EDGE OF POND OF DECEMBER 13, 1989 / / QE�� y ' � \ �r --xs � I � / ` �✓/ ,/ // F.FL.EL.- \ / 26.0.6' HAK' DATER P pIP N / I OI / •.'� A4 JJ•• ...J.N. I � N � �'�a� / O ',; 1.127 ACRES IO / 23 T3I ATOU NAS. ( Q cJNr. /f 1.249 ACRES ! I/\ 1 2.545 ACRES _ 30. -� APRav RLA EI W \ 1 yy (INCL.POND) 24.40' \ 92-�� < � a 1.672 ACRES / GARAG ` E \ 92- 2 7.1 g HAW WA IM (EXCL.POND) (\\ -__ \ L� �ti \ Of / /Q.0 1.616 ACRES t62.t6 (UPLAND) l-+ 'om - ✓rn 4W SITE DATA: 25' S 54.42'00"U 200. 25 m TOTAL AREA: 7.368 s ACRES �_�•,=- -y rsc \ ga0.60 �___ _� W `� 2 2 ,^ /�•,0� NUMBER OF LOTS: 4 y g 75 Z .Ci 0.r 27\ �\ �_ �91� R'o-A I `-�y2 / /•`��'i AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 1.842 x ACRES '_ \� N/F RI ARD d CHRISTOPHER HURLEY N N l N / •/V O a IW - m \16 GARAGE \\ � �� Y yy \ \ or // y� ~� WETLAND AREA: 0.929 ,ACRES N21 * LTL 7�\�\ �� 12'6 o�:in s N 54• '00"6 2 .00 0 tom; A/ / POND AREA: 0.873 xACRES 0156 5 �/ \\ 7Ci 0 20.9 21.2 Z/ 21.2+ \A I.0* \.\ 2.447 ACRES \ �oc,155� FIRE DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE '4'4 CA FEW BASIN h = 1.4 Im \ \\ 12,6 1z.0+ I 41 / / /01Rer30eL." POSTAL DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE W w 22 20.2+ \� , ✓ELL 2.399 ACRES 13.6+ Z� / 2B'4+ \\ \ / SCHOOL DISTRICT! MATTITUCK-CUTCHOGUE � w 23.4+ \ \\ (EXCL. 30% SLOPE AREA)\ YELL p} \ '�.�wvvv 107.9' \ _/// �� • 2 / z AREA OF r z1.6 z0 a /� . -`Is 6 / 1Nyr 56 ce /\ ZONING DISTRICT: R-40 30% SLOPES' 22 1 \ 155-5 / v INM 0.048 ACRE I �� `\ r,rF II W� - _ EARTH 16�t- - - _ \6/ o.ii•E. 1'. Tab O.E 20.6® 21.E® LIL 156 --116 _ _ -� APPLICANT: Ln c �T.T✓'%� - rva Fw. cu7. - `_ L tui �L o!LIM l-\22 FENCE x`.111 / 156 F[N x�lr WIRE LIL S 54.43'00'4 714.60 10, LIt - _-�_ �O'-..�I 6LIIE - -- / \ IN•2. ,ff E �o•E Fro. r56 HARRY G. HOHN uM 20 / of xe 20 /�"'- -ls - ---_22 `, / N 200 EAST 66TH STREET LIL °/, / NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021 N/F MARIO d ILSE TROMBONE �J FEB - 7 1990 SouTPIANA'L"b;r'. MINOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN NOTES: NOTES: PREPARED FOR IJ LOT NUMBERS SHORN HEREON REFER TO SUBDIVISION MAPS OF "PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SECTION B. NASSAU POINT CLUB (1) ALL Lf )AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. HARRY G ♦ JANET HORN PROPERTIES, INC. " FILE NO.745 FILED OCTOBER 1, 1919 AND "AMENDED MAP A OF NASSAU POINT" FILE NO. 155 FILED AUGUST 15, 1922 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. (2) UTILIT FS AVAILABLE ALONG NASSAU POINT ROAD AND ABORN LANE. PREPARED, JANUARY 25, 1990 FROM SURVEY 21 APPROXIMATE EDGE OF RIGHT OF NAY SHOWN HEREON IS SCALED (3) WATER SUPPLY TO BE FROM INDIVIDUAL WELLS. SITUATE WORK COMPLETED, JANUARY 23, 1990 FROM SAID FILED SUBDIVISION MAPS. I (4) INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC SYSTEMS TO BE PROVIDED, SUBJECT TO SUFFOLK NASSAU POINT 3J THIS PROPERTY 15 SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AS STATED IN COUN rY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES APPROVAL. A DEED MADE BY NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. TO - ALBERT C. ABORN AND LAWRENCE M, BAINBRIDGE MADE MAY 27, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1919 AND RECORDED MAY 31, 1919 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE, SAID EASEMENT EXTENDS OVER A STRIP OF SUFFOLK COUNTY , N . Y . LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH ALONG AND ABOVE HIGH MATER MARK. ,E °F NEI;:�., WHICH SHALL FORM A COMMON ROADWAY FOR THE BENEFIT OF 51p C\ ALL PERSONS OWNING LANDS ON NASSAU POINT. SCALE: 1 " _ `JO' f }) ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929, !' • JOHN J. RAYNOR, P.E. d L.S. , P.C. CIVIL ENBINEEAB CCC SURVEYORS SITE PLANNERB 4 93�'' I F 0 an.-\.. • OEERPIELO GREEN P.O. BOX 720 d RSF� py' TAX MAP N0.1 1000-118,00-06.00-001 .000 b 003.001 MATER MILL. N.Y. 11976 15151 )26-7600 LANG BUR -PLOT- TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - 910,14]PF: 144501 531 25-Jon-90 12,53 PM / 1445-1 y III, - �/ / m ZAB RN LA E O O OP v p w ti a N 1 f L1{IARL 5 UOEI9. p QO "Ilhvq 1 m "h PAT L \r a LOT 96 pHJF IPEL :r rBL IVI 71vN MAF OF 'ECTIrJI/ n. NA'.'A POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, /Nr'. FILE NU-4P FILEC, OCTOBER 1. 1919 N 54-42-00-El 143.03 I 1 sJ5OIVIsl9N MAP OF AMENDFb MAP ^A^ JF NA"Al1 PnmT FILENU. Isf FILE: A,JPLS'T IF. IJ- KEY MAP S. \ b. 5.6 J"-�- Lor 97 Lor 96 I � for vv Lar roI SCALE. IM' = 600' \B. WELL -ep 11A i ec£-r. LU rr£r£R � -\ \J / Ii ° S, 1 PART OF C JT 9J f META IN. LCL V 4 wL LF - � \ �`e� ��-2z -I� i t POND WA FER El J.Z' / \ \ �. �TY f1)L -` . (26 PRIVATE ROAD) -z --__ _-CRI vE__ -_- _ __ - a II \ � � ,P;s, E __ -`- w - - - -_ - - - --- --- -- DINE- - - - - - -PAPEo �R EARTH NYT N 54.42'00•E Z 00 _ OlSP o / 363.68 - i O a° 366.32 �Z2--G YfR �x - -- cru. - Lai, r u r u u15cL cur / LP-wlxo / m P O Ixn £ / o.]x•L '^ O LINE OF ORANGE R/BBUNS DEL fNEATfNC JPLANC O' I"• r 27.4 �PdN rH EI 6ru� Lez•u. {y EDGE OF WETLANDS PLACED BY A REPREFENTATI WE 6 �� ////pppPPP Or rH15 OFFICE ON JANUARY 2J, 1990 ' //� _ d \ ` = EDGE OF POND OF UFCEMBER IJ. 1989 (�� ' �/ \ 'i, -xe r.E.FtF1.R5� - FEWE U \ .H. Jn rER F lIaW `1 / / H _. NO AR to si / /NO OO 23.460 S.F. ♦� > I \ \ 9 /rr 1.249 ACRES w IN ,� " 3B nPRON c 7t7LAe FI . 1.247 ACRES 3.672 ACRES yy 24.aa• (EXCL. POND) wl 2.801 ACRES GARAGE _ L (EXCL. POND) \ \ 1_ .239 ACRES PO i ].I HAA IIJIA0 "TER 1 2.753 ACRES ( \ (UPLAND) Wry / 0(/ / /p r- l (UPLAND) CL -17 ----___ c.n.rro. �' O 1ez.16Z9: / p0� / .�`` SITE DATA Wa- W C.E. W 1 o.4e'V. i s VCR \ \ ze• y S 54.42'DO•Y 200- sur ? 25' `\ '� �`` � ' ,yA' � \ WOrEs F / �-P TOTAL AREA: 7.368+ ACRES w - _ \ NYT / �'+ / y�2 NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 ti Im[e I i `L uISEB \ `_ _630.60 _- - mol/ `\ ,` 2d- \ \ / 154. k�� /`,RO -. •� --� ---7 _�� Is caNc �\ _ VO AO \_�r2 AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 2.456± ACRES 7$ Z _ / APRON 27 \ �\_ 91/ ` Ory / _ _ -� / NiF Rl ARD a rHRLsrOPHER HURLEY / � WETLAND AREA: 0.056 ± ACRES 16,540± S.F. POND AREA: 0.873+ ACRES GARAGE /�/ Oy`6 / FIRE DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE Iz.64n. / h / J m zo.z LIL \\ - \\ oan•e, n iN 54• '00'E 200.00 m, �/ POSTAL DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE 21.24 °CAB \ \ II.]t / m 21.2. z \ \ r\ �_ fe£s Gw,56 / SCHOOL DISTRICT: )v1ATTITU CK•CUTCH OGUE mo \ \ 2447 ACRES ` o / d CA TCH BASIN K 4 / / ZONING DISTRICT R-40 h 1.4 17 \ ` \ \ 12.] / GRATE EL.-J 12.fit + tiW / IH.30 l0 w 21.1 22 z]Ib �\ jjjj .2 y \ \ . WELL 2.399 ACRES 1a.e4 ry En Y 2 * 2a.4 I \ \\ \\ (E%CL. 30% SLOPE AREA)\ ^ j JEtt p} n /fes 4 107.9' \ _ -/// AREA OF \ � 21.fit \ \ / `I4 � _-� �� Nrr cP 20.9, 30% SLOPES' t2 0.046 ACRE ��� \ - I � � � nrP Tro. EARTH I6..J� -_ _ _ \e o:ii•2: 1:40 o.e zo.6® 21.6® ut r5B _-pe _ _ -- _ ) rIIE Pro. FENCE / / APPLICANT: LIL c - - FlrE rro. GUY - _ 'LO SIL l o.ex•e. -��p2 / / 156 FE x.l e•R. VIRE �/e O LIL - __�fYE °l�A6 6 LIIE _ 1 IA z• ff £ me Pro. ff uxL ase 5 54.43'00•V 714.68 6 - HARRY G.HOHN lb / - - �'`- / 200 EAST 66TH STREET zx� ///��� \ �� / -22 156 ° / N / NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021 N/F MARIO d ILSE TROMBONE FEB 1 3 1991 MINOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN NOTES. NOTES: PREPARED FOR Il LOT NUMBERS SHORN HEREON REFER TO SUBDIVISION MAPS OF "PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SECTION B, NASSAU POINT CLUB (1) ALL LOT AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE HARRY G ♦ b JANET HORN PROPERTIES, INC• " FILE N0.745 FILED OCTOBER 1, 1919 AND "AMENDED MAP A OF NASSAU POINT" FILE NO. 155 FILED (2) UTILITIES AVAILABLE ALONG NASSAU POINT ROAD AND ARDEN LANE AUGUST 15, 1922 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. PREPARED, JANUARY 26, 1990 FROM SURVEY 21 APPROXIMATE EDGE OF RIGHT OF WAY SHOWN HEREON IS SCALED (3) WATE-RSUPPLY TO BE FROM INDIVIDUAL WELLS. SITUATE WORK COMPLETED, JANUARY 23. 1990 FROM SAID FILED SUBDIVISION MAPS. (4) INDIVI1RIUAL SEPTIC SYSTEMS TO BE PROVIDED, SUBJECT TO SUFFOLK NASSAU POINT REVISED: JANUARY 4, 1991 JJ THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AS STATED IN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES APPROVAL. A DEED MADE BY NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. TO REVISED: JANUARY 7, 1991 ALBERT C, ABORN AND LAWRENCE N, BAINBRIDGE MADE MAY 27. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1919 AND RECORDED MAY 31, 1.919 IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY F� CLERKS OFFICE. SAID EASEMENT EXTENDS OVER A STRIP OF RECEIVED 9 D SUFFOLK COUNTY , N . Y . 3AN 15 1991 LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH ALONG AND ABOVE HIGH WATER MARK, WHICH SHALL FORM A COMMON ROADWAY FOR THE BENEFIT OF JAN 2 3 1991 ALL PERSONS OWNING LANDS ON NASSAU POINT. _ SCALE : 1 " 50' 4/ ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC 2:IIIChDgU9 p;r., hIq)I,'ir' VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929, JOHN J, RAYNOR, P.E. 6 L.S. , P .C. '- • CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS SITE PLANNERS - - \ -L-� IPI • ."'' i,Lv Ny°R,.� TAX MAP NO. , 1000-118,00-06.00-001 .000 8 003.001 DEERFIELD ORM P.O. BOX Teo WATER MILL. N.Y. 1.976 ISIS) 726-760° L VEYQIQ491A0 -PLOT- TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - 9[0. 14]PF: 144501 531 26-Jo,,-90 12,53 PM / 1445-I I I SUFFOBK COUNTY DEPARTMENT �,� OF HEALTH SERVICES HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK THIS Is TO CERTIFY MAT NIS FRaPoseo ARRANGEMENTS FOR DARK SANDY WATER "PLY ANO SEWAGE DISI'I FOR TOPSOILs- HARRY G . & JANET HOHN SANDY ABORN u E 2' IN 7/4' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 5' CLAY w WITH A TOTAL OF 3 LOTS WERE APPROVED OW TAE ABOVE DATE. THESE SAND u FACILITIES Mr/5T CONFORM r0 CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN EFFECT Ar rr1E , TIME OF OOA597RUCr10N. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID MY IN ME SOME 9 EVENT SAID SIRIDIVISIM/DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS DULY PRO WIW THE GRAVEL ,24 COUNTY CLERK WITHIN 6 NONMS OF MIS DATE. GROUND Qo WATER 12' CamBSNr is AEFEBY GIVEN FOR T FILING OF THE HAP ON wraY THIS ENDORSEMENT APPEARS IN ME OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW ANO THE SUFFM.N COUNTY SANITARY CODE. TEST HOLE DATA 4 PROPOSED SOi IIIVISION HAP OF SECTION S. NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. FILE NO. 745 FILED: OCTOBER 4. 1919 KEY MAP 'SUSDIVISION MAP OF AMENDED MAP "A" OF NASSAU POINT FILE NO. 156 FILED: AUGUST 16. 1922 ALDO ANOREOI.11 P.E. SCALE : 1 n � 600e DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DUALITY ground surface LINE L'�I ORANGE RIBBONS DELINEATING LPLANDII EDGE OF TIDAL WETLANDS PLACED Pump to be F N/F CHARLES\ BY A A !PRESENTA TI VE OF THIS OFFICE 5 G.P.M. placed 1n a 1 MAUDE B. HAMMER ON JAAI /1 BY 23, 1990. [min.) frost-proof A4 III pump Structure. PART OF LOT 93 ALIm INW -�- O 60' nox ser♦ 54.42'0 'E ACCESS PROPOSED PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE I 2• PLAN min. to 42 gal. > > 143.mm.03 r LOT 96 TO BAY FOR LOT 2 FUTURE DRIVEWAY FOR 3. Cmin.] took mm m m / Irl LOT 2 nN b i ground 1• 0 1' min. _ground water v BIN o !II LOT 97 407 95 k) LOT 99 LOT /0/ 2 Max. STING itchoutleB'B_ A"3" F inlet; 1/4'1 m0 — — - m Z PART OF LOT SY r` r •Well DRIVEWAY BUILDING _ _ / / > EXISTING 5" liquid level / / POND /I j CLEARING •weu "ENVELOPE" 9 water and gravel \� 4' spoil sod gravel w WA NEB V. • J.7' 'I pSpe: min. 4" 400 m m / aloes 2400 W O m /_ NSA° 42' DO" E T3e.aD A80RN LANE 25' WIDE PRIVATE ROAD) o ai.xe. N �C 5 02'11"If-V C.M. FNo. 363.65 LIL I� 366.32 3. 6 I.ex• V. SECTION o oto BUILDING t ANINp z7.4- LIL uL — ry 6D '7D 0.51• N. PORCh 152 c > 152 /5P 152 NYr Ing 'ENVELOPE" �I ` / wLlxe7Area-rcx O y c '�'/JI a A �N 15z NON - DISTURBANCE itsTYPICAL SEPTIC TANK TYPICAL WELL INSTALLATION Lj ` `°`% P"� ° ° '22' AREA Z DECEMBER / CONSERVATION dt 2 7 (20' WIDE) �1 Dr „OUSE/ ��429 S ,F / / EASEMENT �i' �lp to LOQ _ �o� / rrai.�/ n AREA ,may 16 ry I, O u oa, �nwrse/ /� 0 R' now'. 72y NTT oAl Yes `;' 0=90°00'00" c.n. rro. Ox /5J _ STREET LINE U, 172 �j9° 972 S •F • `°a,? cAencE o R=30.00 os• u. C'�j �1 `V POOLS y W HO//SE / rN200.00 O NOTE: THE BUILDING "ENVELOPES" SHOWN HEREON 2 LEACHING ground surface � �Y. STORY / h'�{Y MIN. . ` �� -1LL75'�^ „ I 1$• ry�T7/1Zl-jZ7L711�21� INCLUDE ALL PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS 8 IE-- 5' MIN.----����IIII 1' min.-2' max. co •J °a:os•Fe NYT •J k-WMIN—� pipe, 2400 oN `. 1 pip., 4" min. dia. e o �I n �a:,l, 27. N 51'}2'00"E 630.60 APPROX. LOCATION -y N/F RICHARD 6 asp• u /5f•��QvP STRUCTURES. P1ts / 2' max, N =` .--E m OF E%ISTING A 0 Z N rJ / hA� CHRISTOPHER 3 A I W Io V DRIVEWAY 9 C��'6 c n. / O` OPO � >c 7`� �' HOLE 2' HURLEY ti B' MIN. 20" m uG 900 GAL. SEPTIC TANK 2'-9" L ? u / C.se• e. N 54.42.00"E 200.00 z EAII, ��� 106. 584 S .F . pJPE. 55' / ti ��p 100.$5 / / I.. Fl. • = o n 2 N07.9• a //� CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA le.aC ~ 3' m / TEST WELL♦2^ 7EuT_ �5 /2.22'!0"E J 10' IN. z N E - m_1n� /. 1/IT11111 AV.' T / NYr loO.37 O �L t m 3' 1S' I,I 155-5 RIE LINE ONLY] J min. Z \nwmNun ur. 'III ° S 54.43'00'W 714-68 10' 1 l °.le• N. NON - DISTURBANCE 11,—Ga ^ nox ier /� ' :1ea uL Lr� uL oae.Fw HOUSE euLlsAo n y•, 6' Q TOP OF coexTA I/ r9s res res en AREA min. I9 1 BLUFF W, N. L c 9 ^ 20' WIDE o 0 o W uxs E%ISTING N/F MARIO A IL5E TROMBONE //� Olti ( ) WELL Ica O 0 rr�1^� CLEARING EXISTING I 5' MIN. I� 1 DRIVEWAY Q — I 30' WIDE AREA M WHICH TO )E-5' MIN. I MI ,_; o I1 LOCATE MAX. 16' WIDE DRIVEWAY L _ _ — — 5' MIN ° rn B. 2' m1n. BUILDING .44 �'_ � � "ENVELOPE"! , (MEANDERING TO AVOID LARGE TREES) LOT LINE clean and ground water TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT TYPICAL LEACHING POOL it �P THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLAT PREPARED: JANUARY 31, 1991 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK' S OFFICE FILING DATE SUFFOLK'S COUNTY CLERK' S OFFICE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD BY RESOLUTION DATED NO. DATE REVISION FINAL PLAT 3�g9` 1 7-17-91 Added T.W,i2 DATE OF SIGNING: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD 2 7-2A-91 Rev,typ.lot layout a leaching Pool details 3 8.30-91 BUILDING ENVELOPES 1991 CHAIRMAN MINOR SUBDIVISION MAP OF THE SUBDIVIDER MAKES NO OFFER OF DEDICATION TO THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WITH RESPECT TO THE LANDS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. ENGINEER B SURVEYOR HARRY V A N D THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL LOTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT COMPLY WITH THE JOHN J. RAY/JOR. P.E. d L.s. . P.c. ! • REOUIREMENTS OF THE SOI TOWN ZONING CODE. DEERFIELD GREEN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY ME FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS MUNTAUK HIGHWAY JANET rr T COMPLETED JANUARY 23, 1990 AND THAT ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN EXIST AND THAT THEIR POSITIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN. WATER MILL, NEW YORK 1!976 V A N {� r H 0 H N OI✓NERS HARRY G. d JANET HOHN A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS 6 RESTRICTIONS, WHICH THIS SUSDIVISIQId WILL APPEAR IN DISTRICT 1000 � ^ 200 EAST 667H STREET AFFECTS LOTS IN THIS SUBDIVISION, HAS BEEN FILED IN THE ON SECTION SHEI�T 118.00 IN BLOCK 05.00 OF THE SITUATE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE AT LIBER OF SUFFOLK COUNTY AX MAP. PARCEL NUMBERS ARE SHOWN L SDI VISION DA TA CONVEYANCES, PAGE THUS: PLAT PREPARED BY SU NASSAU POINT JOHN J. RA YNOR, P.E. d L.S. , P.C. RP,te oP NEW YG TOTAL AREA: 7.359 ACRES THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL REAL PROPE/?TY TAX SERVICE AGENCY 5 `�1 nAYNO RTT NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 SYSTEMS FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT ysPtE °F fI 0 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 'r A SUM OF LOT AREAS: 7.368 ACRES COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND REOUIREMEN 0H g. RAY P� SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YORK 11 OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF >a �° 'k AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 105,983 S.F. y HEALTH SERVICES. - FIRE DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE JOHN J. RAYNOR, LAND SURVEYOR NO. 49318 h ' o� POSTAL DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE HATER HILL, NEW YORK o Dgg3l �y2y SCHOOL DISTRICT: MATTI TUCK - �' h SCALE: 1 " 100' FD SVS ° 533S5 Cs= 100 0 100 200 300 AND CUTCHOGUE ✓OPER J. LL, NR. P.E. NO. 53385 d HATER HILL, NEY YORK �OPESSIONPI-` ZONING DISTRICT: R-40 I -PLOT- FINAL PLAT - 1410, 141PF: 144502 502 31-Jon-91 10:57 AM / 1445-1 Ii SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES HAUPPAUCE, NEN YORK THIS 15 M CERTIFY THAT TE PROPOSED ARRAACpEMS FOR DARK SANDY 1, ^n\' WATER SBY%.YAND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FOR TOPSOIL m V ABORN HARRY G . 6 JANET HOHN SANDY NE 2' w IN TEE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD n s• CLAY ppr4 WITH A TOTAL OF 3 LOTS WERE APPROVED ON THE ABOVE DAIS. D,25527 SAND " FACILITIES HAST COAFORH TO CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT TE & SOME B 1 TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID ONLY IN THE �2 EVENT SAID SUBDIVISION/D£VE aPHENT PLAN IS DULY FILED WITH THE GRAVEL Qp COUNTY CLERK WITHIN MONTHS MONTHS OF THIS DATE. GROUND WATER 12' CONSENT IS HERESY GIVEN FOR THE FILING OF THE MAP ON WHICH THIS ENDORSEMENT APPEARS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK IN N ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW AND THE TEST HOLE DATA '\ KEY MAP SUFFOLK COUNTY SANITARY CODE. (i PROPOSED I' SUBDIVISION MAP OFAMENDEDMAPS"A" OF NASSAU POINTFILE NO. 156 AUGUST E9, OCTOBER 4. 1919 SCALE : 1 " = 600' ALDO AWREOLI, P.E. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ENVIRMNENTAL QUALITY Around surface �\ LINE IOF ORANGE RIBBONS DELINEATING UPLAND EDGE OF TIDAL WETLANDS PLACED Pump to be F N71 CHARLES 6 BY AIREPRESENTATIVE OF THIS OFFICE 5 G.P.M. planed in a ` MAUDE S. HANMER ON JANUARY 23. 1990. [min.) frost-proof pump etru.tur.. PART OF LOT 93 l ewmxux '" PROPOSED N.V. ..'� 54.42'0 "E 50' ACCESS EASEMENT Q \ 143.03 I'' PLAN ml d. to 42 gal.tan p J GO7 96 TO BAY FOR LOT 2 >, CONSERVATION I (min.) took m � o/ :'LLo°ueABE: �_% EASEMENT AREA N o Around Around water Tod o 3 LOT 97 LOT 98 h LOT 99 LOT 101 2' max. — '� — — — — +,` / „- WELL EXISTING m PART OF LO7 X33 DRIVEWAY outlet 9 w4"3"_ Finlet: 1/4"/ft. min Z �.7 BUILDING pitch 16'• _ _ _ _ ni si EXISTING ewzu "ENVELOPE'" I/6"/Pt. 7 8"�5 -Eliqutd level water bearing 3 / / POND / CLEARING sand and gravel m m t \\" .� / E N 54° 42' 00" E Ta0.0^ ABQRN LANE !25' WIDE PRIVATE ROADJ lsIkll m. NATER EL. 311 pipe: min. 4” din. E Yom - o.cB• s. NOTES: close 2400 �C N 5 O2tl4 0 11"W LE M. B1 } 363.68 LR LI( CIL 366.32 LII 3. 6 1 ee• V SECTION '� on BUILDING oExNlNc Nrr , o N \00.00 sr x. PORCH f I5z - 15E /5E l5P 15z NON - DISTURBANCE �P^ 'ENVELOPE" -�'� : or urs cSss"ax D N c e A 1 1 . THE BUILDING "ENVELOPES" SHOWN, HEREON o • EDGE OF POW OF I. o o a +�22' AREA INCLUDE ALL PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS & Z DECEEER 13. 1989rG1 _ CONSERVATION (20' WIDE) STRUCTURES.SEPTIC TANK TYPICAL WELL INSTALLATION /5EASEMEN HOOS 6 ry o 'rHn: / / 2 AREA N ph\ ry't �t� 2 . LOTS 1 & 2 SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO NASSAU O M m C �> '•C�7�j 15 A Nrr /fir POINT ROAD BY MEANS OF A MAXIMUM 16 FOOT WIDE Z /Lqy P° .Te, 0 15J p 6 p=90°00'00" c.n. ros. 1 »/ o.es• e 5 DRIVEWAY WHICH SHALL MEANDER TO AVOID LARGE STREET LINE m H �a cABACE R-47.12 A.• V 2 LEACHING _ 159. 972 S . F . ? G L-v. lz O•/ pw TREES. Around surface y �r sE /I��� /% / 3ryp lr N 5} }2 02"E 182. 15 2151 5 54°42.00"W 200.00 a war 5' MIN, POOLS AS N. c. Nrr J E-- 5' MIN, 1' mf n.-2' max. [ N. rxo. r f YSEPTIC " lose 2400 p I� • N/F RICHARD d6'MIN—� p p max ZN YJ L NSP}2'00^E 630.60 PROPOSED COMMON i e, 4" min. dla. 2' < i ''I k�yid re P7/ A0 CP CHRISTOPH`— • ' HURLEY75'—' RIVEWAY FOR LOTSnjA c.n. rro. r yA 106 . 584 S . F . 0JeB. 155 GARAG6' MIN. 20" 2._y.. _ME, /�A 1 & 2 c.m• e.�� L a z N 54°42'00'E 200-00 m / 1. 100.5e ' OMiE EL. n j lO>.s• CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA TEST �ie.Oc s o ti man. m� W � L11 // / TEST WELL I2 I Q4� NYT 5 /2°22'/0'E 10' MIN. T u01 E Fes. E� 15' 1 INE O 155-5 [TIE LINE ONLYJ min. / m \Awmxun ul. ° 5 54°43'00'Y 714.66 P1es F. Mr. BET Ise Ln 11.19• N NON - DISTURBANCE HOUSE aw 6• Q co". 1 s I� Ln ce c¢ o.ae• E. l� TOP OF cuuw.w L o Tse Ass /aa uL tee. AREA min. I c c I BLUFF +.E• 4 EXISTING ✓ 1 (20' WIDE) 0 !] O � j °v uNe NIF MARIO A ILSE TROMBONE // O� WELLI Ica CLEARING Ce EXISTING n 5' MIN. I n i 0 0 0 DRIVEWAY �6' MIN. MIN. IL / 6' MIN, I m 6'—� 2' m1n. ENVELOP �,_ I ENVELOPE" LOT LINE JJ Olean and Around water = li, / /��J TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT TYPICAL LEACHING POOL PROPOSED U;f POI N DRIVEWAY FOR LOTS 1 & 2 TO CONTINUE TO NASSAUPOINT ROAD THROUGH THIS AREA (ACTUAL (•,. ' COURSE OFISAID DRIVEWAY TO MEANDER TO AVOID LARGE `P 1 TREES) PLAT PREPARED: JANUARY 31, 1991 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK' S OFFICE FILING DATE SUFFOI�'X COUNTY CLERK' S OFFICE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE NO. DATE REVISION FINAL PLAT SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD BY RESOLUTION DATED 1 7-17-91 Added T.W.f2 DATE OF SIGNING: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD 2 7-2A-91 Re V.typ-lot layout & leeching pool details a e-30-91 Building Envelopes I MINOR SUBDIVISION MAP OF CHAIRMAN 4 9-5-91 Common Drive for Iota 1 A 2 THE SUBDIVIDER MAKES ND OFFER OF DEDICATION TO THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WITH RESPECT TO THE LANDS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. ENGINEER d SURVEYOR HARRY G . A N D THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL LOTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT COMPLY WITH THE JOHN J. RA YNOR, 1 .E. & L.S. P.C. REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING CODE. DEERFIELD GREEN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE MO WATER ME FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS K HIGHWAY JANET H 0 H N COMPLETED JANUARY 23, 1990 AND THAT ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN EXIST AND THAT WATER MILL, NEW YORK 11876 ' THEIR POSITIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN. OI✓NERS HARRY G. & JANET HOHN A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS & RESTRICTIONS, WHICH THIS SUBDIVISION WILL APPEAR IN DISTRICT 1000 200 EAST 66TH STREET AFFECTS LOTS IN THIS SUBDIVISION, HAS BEEN FILED IN THE ON SECTION 5'NEET II3.00 IN BLOCK 05.00 OF THE SITUATE D NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE AT LIBER OF SUFFOLK COU/y47 TAX MAP. PARCEL NUMBERS ARE SHOWN QQ ♦ f �$ CONVEYANCES, PAGE _ THUS: NASSAU POINT PLAT PREPARED BY OF NE SUBDIVISION DATA `��S JOHN J. RA YNOR, P.E. & L. S. , P.C. aPSL W to TOTAL AREA: 7.366 ACRES THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL REAL PRgPERTY TAX SERVICE AGENCY �I RAYry', SYSTEMS FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT {CZE of NEpy Y TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Rgry 1 TOWN g \ NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 y - -\ o,P NINC BOFlRD COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND REOUlREMENTS \�� J. Rqy ., } SUM OF LOT AREAS: 7. 366 ACRES OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF >S �C• qo SUFFOLK COUNTY . NEW YORK i' AVERAGE LOT SIZE. 1051963 S.F. HEALTH SERVICES. =• � FIRE DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE � M JOHN J. RA YNOR, LAND SURVEYOR NO. 49318 .e q'o, 9493i�/,o' POSTAL DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE ^, J1 r� ` SCALE: I " = 100' PATER MILL. NEI/ POR/( �se7 LAND S�p�` SCHOOL DISTRICT: MATTITUCK - `l:"o F1'o. c33�5 G m7 o roD zoo sol CUTCHOGUE JOHN J. RAYNOR. P.E. NO. 53385 pN Ee- WATER MILL. NEIL YORK °FESSIONA�" ZONING DISTRICT: R-40 -PLOT- FINAL PLAT - 1410. 14] PF: 144502 502 31-Jon-91 10:57 AM / 1445-1 ii SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES HAUPPAOG£, NEN YORK THIS IS r0 CER rIFY THAT THE PROPOSED ARRANGEMENTS FLIP Y X// DARK SANDY m ^� NATER SIPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FOR TOPSOIL 1 j v ABORN LANE / i HARRY G . & JANET HOHN SANDY w 2' d ,rvo IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD e' CLAY WITH A TOTAL OF--;i- LOTS WERE APPROVED ON TK ABOVE DATE. THESE SANG 6 FACILITIES Regr CONFORM TO CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID ONLY IN THE SOME 9 2 o` EVENT .SAID "DIVISION/DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS DULY FILED WITH THE GRAVEL + , COUNTY CLERK WITHIN 5 NONTHS OF THIS DATE. GROUND WATER 12' IIS c CONSENT IS HEREBY GIVEN FOR TME FILING OF THE MAP ON WHICH THIS ENDORSEMENT APPEARS IN IHE OFFICE OF THE COUNrr CLERK IN N KEY MAP ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW AND THE TEST HOLE DATAPROPOSED SUBDIVISION MAP OF SECTION S. NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. FILE NO. 745 FILED: OCTOBER 4, 1919 SUFFOLK COUNTY SANITARY CODE. '� SUBDIVISION HAP OF AMENDED MAP "A" OF NASSAU POINT FILE N0. 156 FILED: AUGUST 16. 1922 SCALE : 1 " = 600' ALDO ANOREOLI. P.E. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DUALITY ground surface __\ LINE 9F ORANGE RIBBONS DELINEATING UPLA7 'D EDGE OF TIDAL WETLANDS PLACED Pump to be F N/F CHARLES 6 BY A I'PEPRESENTAT/VE OF THIS OFFICE 5 G.P.M. planed in'a 8 ` MAUDE B. HAMMER ON JA's VARY 23, /990. [min.] fraet-Pro of Pump struoture. PARI OF LOT 93 mx nINm. 50' norv. eeT� 5143, 3 'E PLAN man. to 42 gal . ¢ ,> 143.03 1 Li >• 96 > CONSERVATION Wnle n/ T2' m EASEMENT AREA I � fair.) tan/( m nxx ET H LOT 99 LOT 10/ ground ground Water 0 VIN `�' LOT L EXISTING 9B ' min. — T- — — = m 1� � •i, r +w£LL NOTES: 2' max. 'I` m t DRIVEWAY outlet w inlet: 1/4"/ft. 40 Z q BUILDING I1 .N THE BUILDING "ENVELOPES" SHOWN HEREON 3_ min. I �� � EXISTING •weLL "ENVELOPE" INCLUDE ALL PORTIONS OF EXISTING BUILDINGS AND pooh 1B" �5„ — — �' — — POND CLEARING STRUCTURES. Pt. B" liquid level water bearing .� WATER EL. ^ J. n. Fw. sand and gravel _ m m w b I N 54" 42' 00" E -+30.00 ABORN LANE I25' WIPE PRIVATE ROAD) o i7 s. pipe: min. 4" din. w � 'O, 366.32 3. 6 I'°�' °' 2 . LOTS 1 & 2 SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO NASSAU aloes 2400 u N S On f6'11"N a.n. FND. 21 f. 353.68 - LIL L)L LIL Ln w on BUILDING TUI,UO LeAxixc 152 _ 158 lee 15z NU NON - DISTURBANCE POINT ROAD BY MEANS OF A MAXIMUM 16' WIDE SECTION ° N o.el• x PORCH ins 'ENVELOPE" -� ', 'Il. ,+ W= ° ° c B " i��21 AREA DRIVEWAY WHICH SHALL MEANDER TO AVOID LARGE �- EGGS DR POND a` 'i�' 1 a ° q TYPICAL SEPTIC TANK TYPICAL WELL INSTALLATION r\j °£DE"BER "• 'B°9 �1 ' // m " CONSERVATION ;,� 3 (20' WIDE) TREES. „ STORY//� / h EASEMENINYT (b2r 254 . 429 S .F . P AREAcH s� MRVn 1`� 3. THE PORTION OF LOT 2 LYING NORTHWESTERLY / �p ,// 2 2- ' r so OF THE EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF ABORN ' a-9D°00.00" Cn. END. a ��'� cnx"cF o R=30.Dois; � COMPRISES PART OF LOT 93 ON PROPOSED 6TREET LINE < 0 1 v8 i 1159 . 972 S .F . i3 mL=47. 1z 1 0 SUBDIVISION MAP OF SECTION B, NASSAU POINT CLUB L' 6 v N 5f°f2'00"E 102. 15 2 5 5 54°42'00'Y 200.02LEACHING ground surface y a �y5. N PROPERTIES, INC., FILE NO. 745, FILED: OCTOBER 4, 5' MIN. POOLS �0 85 'IV 15' ,J o "e rrva°' 1919 & SUBDIVISION MAP OF AMENDED MAP "A" OF / i' mfn.-2' max. z 'oN Cs0• x 154 , I NASSAU POINT, FILE NO. 156, FILED: AUGUST 16, 1922. 1 ° I� c I'el L N51^12'00•E 630.60 76' WIDE EASEMENT N/F RICHARD 5 aloes 2400 ������ '" ° °° 21' 3 8 CHRISTOPHER 4, THIS PORTION OF LOT 93 ON AFORESAID MAPS IS TO BE 11-5-MIN. - 1mox. N W 75,E " AREA, TO CONTAIN 2f HURLEY _� pip., 4" min. die. 2 w = I ftah:l/B"/TL. m k � 'HOLE COMMON DRIVEWAY 9 P m ° m I',(L / cARAc O` O ABANDONED. z m FOR LOTS 1 & 2. 909 ,MIN. <� ° /��a c.n. Fxo. N 51°42'00"E 200.00 900 GAL. SEPTIC TANK 2'-9" C a3 � /I�/ Z [p IDD 56 / alUTf EL 17 P^ m hO 107 9' �� CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA TEST �ie a0 rte. y 3• r•n W — 9 / _ TEST WELL i2 WELL ys' NYT 100.37 n i( / •p 5 N M mfn. H M'� -� 15, W- 1 4 155-5 (TIE LINE ONLY] 10' MIN. ?, _ 0 - AHOUSE En min. / �noxnlsEn ise Ln B 54°43'00"Y 714-68 .1% FN. NON - DISTURBANCE -9" 6' Q TOP OF coxxEn sul LIL nae E.euLxeno o !ss !ss :ns uL AREA a` R " 165 20' WIDEman. I BLUFF " eN/FMARIO 6 ILSE TROMBONE ( )a crLICEEARLC WELLIr^ CLEARINCIE%ISTI A 5' ' DRIVEWAV�5' MIN. MSN lei BUILDING 5' MIN. B'— 2' mfn. "ENVELOPE" ` LOT LINE clean and ground water — A COMMON D IVEWAY FOR LOTS 1 & 2 TO CONTINUE TO NASSAU J POINT ROA' THROUGH THIS AREA (ACTUAL COURSE OF SAID ((�� TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DRIVEWAY ** MEANDER TO AVOID LARGE TREES). J �P PLAT PREPARED: JANUARY 31, 1991 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK' S OFFICE FILING DATE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK' S OFFICE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE NO. DA 7E REVISION FINAL PLAT SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD BY RESOLUTION DATED-- 1 7-17-91 Added T.W.+2 DATE OF SIGNING: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD 2 7-2A-91 Rev,typ.lot layout & leaching pool details 3 8-30-91 Building Envelopes MINOR SUBDIVISION MAP OF 1gg) CHAIRMAN 5 s-105-91 6-91 Not 100 3 Drivefor plots Iond easement THE SUBDIVIDER MAKES NO OFFER OF DEDICATION TO THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I WITH RESPECT TO THE LANDS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. ENGINEER 6 SURVEYOR HARRY A N D THIS !S TO CERTIFY THAT ALL LOTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT COMPLY WITH THE JOHN J. RA)NOR, P.E. d L.S. , P.C. REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING CODE. DEERFIELD GREEN � I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY ME FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS MONTAUK HIGHWAY V A N T r HOHN COMPLETED JANUARY 23, 1990 AND THAT ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN EXIST AND THAT WATER MILL, NEW YORK 11976 THEIR POSITIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN. "' ` OWNERS i HARRY G. d JANET HOHN A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS & RESTRICTIONS, WHICH THIS SUSDIVI77•,ION WILL APPEAR IN DISTRICT 1000 Al SITUATE 200 EAST 66TH STREET AFFECTS LOTS IN THIS SUBDIVISION, HAS BEEN FILED IN THE ON SECTION 5'11EET 116.00 IN BLOCK 05.00 OF THE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE AT LIBER _ _ OF SUFFOLK COUA'IjY TAX MAP. PARCEL NUMBERS ARE SHOWNY`JI hQ CONVEYANCES, PAGE._, THUS: NASSAU POINT SU@DIVISION DATA PLAT PREPARED BY THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSALREAL PRO TY TAX SERVICE AGENCY ; D JOHN J. RAYNOR, F.E. d L.S. 1 .C. .�� oF NEV, TOTAL AREA: 7.368 ACRES D TOWN OF SOUTHOL SYSTEMS FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT of Ne W 0 FA 0 4'} NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND REOUIREMENT PjE Yp SUM . OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF OF LOT AREAS: 7.368 ACRES 6 , R4,. '��. SUFFOLK COUNTY , NEW YORK S24I� ��<J - "A AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 106,953 S.F. * �o HEAL 7H SERVICES. FIRE DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE TOWN SCALE: 100' PLANNINGG JOHN J. RA YNOR, LAND SURVEYOR NO. 49318 Cc � $ Q- POSTAL DISTRICT: CUTCHOGUE N o. m _ PLANNING BOARD o 100 0 100 = 200 300 NATER MILL, NEIL YORK F410493i Ey SCHOOL DISTRICT: MATT/TUCK - s SFOLgryp SO�J CUTCHOGUE JOHN J. RAYNOR, P.E. NO. 53385 Fo NO s3ay5 NATER MILL, NEIL YORK ZONING DISTRICT: R-40 pR'UFEssIONP`'� �i�, -PLOT- FINAL PLAT - 14 [0. 147 PF: 144502 502 31-Jon-91 10:57 AM / 1445-I 1 N/F CHARLES e MAUDE B. HAMMER N 54.42'00"E 143.03' LOT 96 1y ' PART OFI LOT 93 I it I q ♦�\� IT R-45.00 \ R+�'0 .S L-46.01 j 1 1 1 1.08 80 n-56.34'32' N �� ��_ R-100.52 ♦'. 'q �, L-34.06 'PROPOSED SUBDIVISION MAP OF SECTION B, NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. FILE NO. 745 FILED. OCTOBER 4, 1919" j of_ D-10.21 07" 'SUBDIVISION MAP OF AMENDED MAP "A" OF NASSAU POINT FILE NO. 156 FILED. AUGUST 16, 1922" A� m COT 97 LOT 9B LOT 99 LOT f0f I m � IN �♦ ' 1 \ � I p1 L✓/ LINE OF ORANGE flIBBONSDELINCA TING •\ F 1, \ _ ! UPLAND EDGE OF TIDAL WETLANDS PLACED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF \ 1 �$ ��5,22, m ` THIS OFFICE ON JANUARY 23 1990. h N 54•42'00'E 366.32' W 1 I1 II 1.e _ _ o I POND ABORN LANE - _EiflrM - - - „5z 1 i0 _ 0) _ l 25' WIDE PRIVATE RDA O I ,'� J LR 2 I LIL I52 / I 02.46'11'W vO1i ;� I " J 20 ' WIDE AREA v / 60.00' � �!F-NON-DISTURBANC 1 I % LOT 3 '-. / f AS SHOWN 0 ylEl� ti 41/ W i e ' I CONSERVA TION`EASEPT�'NT „REA , EDGE OF POND OF _ NfMW SI�IVfSILW NIP LP 1 >I yJJ�� w z I DECEMBER 1$ 1989\ �` _ / / HARRY G. G JANET HORN Z ---_-_ AS SHOWN ON F$$LEO MA INCLIL�/1SES p�YQ'U" / / APPAQXIMATE EL19E ALL of car,2)EXCEPT�,"'AREA L. // A, / OF gl9MT OF MAY WITHIN THE BUILDING UILOIN I ENVEL PE I� h m I -'-o -s.. of FWBTYPA h,'T 1 Ipl* `'•a} / R-30.00 A-90000,0012 -90.00'100 ..�. / IY WZ 1 - � "y 1 NveoPEl I _ _____ •� 'aa __.__ TRY aN g u PROPO, D M# �y/LANN __ _ / _ _ __ __ - _ I/Y _ "PKAT{OR WITH 9TEPSC z I A 0UNIT /" - _ 1-�-. - _ ------ 00.00' - S 54.42'00"W :� / 5 � _ NYT _M1 rl�R£T HALL 1 ___-ZTdtlE'OVEfl ASP_NALr Mif VE S 649-48-00"W 0 S 54-42'00"W630.6 .57' 4 27 N4 p/IDVIO£5 A 16 A IHE coNEAEEMEC N/F RICHARD C CHRISTOPHER HURLEY AREn rD rAIN covNav NFrvEMAr EM cars I ANO E LOT 1 MI XN SURGIVISIGY.WP!f HARRY G. O JANET ROHN i I THE ELEVATION DATUM FOR THE EXISTING J CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON IS THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL OA TUM OF 1929 l N.G. V.D. 1929 / . THE CONTOURS ARE THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED AS AN ACCOMMODATION TO THE RESULT OF AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY THE ccrENr FOR USE IN APPLYING TO THE BUILDINGCONDUCTED BY THIS OFFICE IN DECEMBER DEPARTMENT FOR A BUILOINO PERMIT OR A CERTIFICATE 1989 MAP OF SURVEY OF OCCUPANCY. THIS MAP IS NOT INTENDED FOR USE AS A TITLE SURVEY. ITEMS INDICA TING EVIDENCE BE OF POSSESSION IF ANY EXIST, WHICH MAY AFFECT TITLE MAY NOT BE SHOWN u 76LQT8H LOT 2 OCTMINOR SUBDIVISION MAP OF TOWN' OUNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION DB ADDITION TO A SURVEY MAP HARRY G . JANET H O I'°I N BEARING A LICENSED LAM SURVEYOM'S SEAL IS A VIOLATION i OF SECTION 7209 SUBDIVISION 2 OF THE NEN YORK STA HT FILE NO. 9172 FILED: NOVEMBER 26, 1991 SURVEYED.' FEBRUARY SB, 199@ EDUCATION LAN' MAP REVISED.' MARCH 10, 1998 /mK srzs ONLY) ONLY COPIES FROM THE HE LA AL OF THIS NAP EMBOSSED SITUATE APRIL 29, 199@ l NECK SfIE NOrEO I WITH AN ORIGINAL OF THE LAND SURVEYOR'S ID TRUED BEAT, OR. SEPTEMBER 30, 199@ l PROPOSED PLATFORM DHL r 1 SA9E6 BEAT, SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID TRUE COPIES. NASSAU POINT ON AP £D IMPROVEMENTS DEPICTED EV THIS NAP ARE BASED ON APPROXIMATE BIM£NSANNG THRIVED FROM THE CLIENT'S - DESIGN ANO/OV N AC PLAN THE TO THE LENT A M£NO TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SnSg OF NE{y Y ARE BROWN LJ AN ACCOMMODATION TO RHE CLIENT AND AD RESPOYSILIANCE IS ASSUMED BY INE WITH ZONING FOR OTHER SUFFOLK COUNTY, N . Y . THE COMPLIANCE Of THE PROPOSAL WITH ZONtN6 OR OTHER 9 � 1, RAY/1,0 D'P� RfGULATIOVs. SCALE: V = 60 ' JOHN J. RAYNOR. P.E. 6 L.S., P.C. ? m F' AG• CIVIL ENGINEERS AREA = 159j 972 S . F . j SURVEYORS SITE PLANNERS • D D 3l TO TIE LINES ) DEERFIELD GREEN P.O. BOX 720 SG• Ju,. WATER,MILL, N Y. 119]fi ( 516 1 ]26-)60O L `9GNIf .99316 ®3998 JOHN J RAVNOR P.E. 6 LS . P C TAX MAP NO.; 1000-118.00-06.00-P/0 003.001 WPM Survey Map - 2 [0, 14]PF: 144504 511 3P-Sep-9B 03: 01 PN f 1445-1