Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-117.-8-10
HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr., Chairman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr. WILLIAM F. MULLEN, Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 TELF~HONE 765-1938 April 18, 1983 Mr. Robert W. Tasker Town Attorney 425 Main Street Greenport, New York 11944 Re: Marine Associates, Inc. Site Plan Dear Mr. Tasker: Purusant to our telephone conversation regarding Marine Associates, Inc. we will not proceed with any action on the proposed site plan until a determination is made by the Town Board regarding the change of zone application presently be- fore them. Thank you for your opinion on this matter. Very truly yours, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Susan E. Long, Secretary JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAROI VITALS'I,\IISI'ICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT August 22, 1983 APPLICANT: Marine Associates, Inc. ADDRESS: New Suffolk, New York PERMIT APPLIED FOR AND APPLICATION NUMBER: Change of Zone from "C" Light Industrial District to "M-i" General Multiple Residence District, Petition No. 257. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant desires to redevelop the property to construct condominium units. PROJECT LOCATION: New Suffolk, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, New York, bounded north by Loria and Cutchogue Harbor, east by Cutchogue Harbor, south by MacKay and Cutchogue Harbor, and west by First Street. SEQR DETERMINATION: A draft environmental impact statement has been prepared on this project and is on file. SEQR LEAD AGENCY: Town of Southold AVAILABILITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT: The draft environmental impact statement may be reviewed at the address listed below. Comments on the project must be submitted to the Contact Person indicated below no later than October Is 1983. CONTACT PERSON: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold, Town Hall Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765-1801 PEEMISEF5 . I-Z 2,,-9 S.85'ZT'OO'E.-19S. 45 3-4 N.4~33'00" E 50.0 4-5 N,~5'ZT'QO'W- 192.g4 5-6 N 5008'OO"E. - 272.61 8-i N.84.°SZ'OO"V.Z - ZlS"i'- ~j ~E$~ [2E~NC E D.k,)- i 9L.)FF, C,i; fAS( MAP DATA.; 67- 5255'2I'10'E. 155'! ENGINEERING REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY For MARINE ASSOCIATES INC. 24-UNIT CONDOMINIUM NEW SUFFOLK, N.Y. APRIL 1983 Prepared By JOHN P. MAHONEY, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 117 EAST ISLIP, N.Y.11730 Engineering Report on Water Supply for Marine Associates Inc. 2d-Unit Condominium New Suffolk, N.Y. Scope of Project .A 24-unit condominium consisting of 2-bedroom units is proposed for a 3.~? acre parcel located between First Street and Peconic Bay at New Suffolk in the Town of ~outhold. (see location map, Addendum - page 1) Water Suool¥ Demand The water supply requireme~.ts on a daily demand basis is: 24 units x 225 gal/unit/da~ = 5400 gal. Total annual demand is: 5~00 gal/day x 30 days x 4 months = 6&8,000 gal. The project is conceived as a summer operation only with the season extending from the Memorial Day weekend through the end of September. Site Description Elevations on the site are relatively constant va~ing from El. 5.5 at First Avenue to &.5 at the bulkhead. Soils are from the Pleistocene series of the Ouaternary sy.stem (see Addendum - page 2) consisting of undifferentiated outwash deposits.. A test hole shows 2 feet of miscellaneous ~fill of s~nd ~nd shells, six feet of consolidated bog, and then clean saud and gravel. Ground water is at elevation 1.5. There is no vegetation on the site. The entire site has been used for industrial purposes for many years. Water Resources There is no public water supply available in the area. There is no liklihood of a public supply for many years. The project must depend on the ground water resources available at the site. Site Investigation · Test wells were constructed in four locations (see site plan Addendum, page 3). Test results are sho~,~ on Addendum pages d-A through A-E. Test wells #3 and #4 show good water strata between elevation -4.0 to -20.0. Well ~& results on page &-A of Addendum show results at elevation -20.0 after 1 hour of pumping at 30 gpm. An adequate supply of high quality water is available at %his depth. Two wells separated by 50 ft. will be placed at this ~pth in this area (as show~ on the site plan included in the Addendum). - 2- Consumptive Use of Water Since all water withdrawn for domestic purposes will be returned to ground water via cesspools, consumptive use of water is estimated at zero. The possibility of watering ground covers introduced in development is minimal. The q~antify~ng of a safe yield for the site is unnecessary in the absence of a significant cbnsumptive use of water. Water Supply Design Considerations Despite the absence of a consumptive use of water,~the design of the water supply system must recognize the delicacy of the fresh water reservoir. The average depth of 27 feet of the reservoir renders it ~~~tnerable to contamination from sewage introduced above and from the movement upwards of saline waters from below. The water supply system shall consist of two wells, each set 20 feet into the fresh water reservoir. At this depth, chlorides are expected to be 100-120 mg./1. Maximum capacity of each well shall be 15 gpm. Both wells will operate simul- taneously. The intent of thi arrangement is to prevent the establishment of a drawdo%m curve about each well. The absence of a drawdown will prevent the upconing of saline water into the well point. Sewage Disposal facilities will be placed seaward of the wells to prevent migration of sewage constituents to the wells. Horizontal movement shall be directly seaward from - 3- the cesspool effluents penetrating vertically to the saline interface below the sewage disposal area. A 2500 gal. tank shall be provided for a one half hour contact time for chlorine which will be introduced from chlorinators operating in tandem with the well pumps. From the contact tank, a duplex pump arrangement will pump into a 1000 gal. pneumatic tank. A 2½" dia. water line will deliver water to the condominium units as sho~n on the site plan. Future Development of New Suffolk The zoning map of the Town of Southold (Addendum, page 5) shows the potential for future development in the New Suffolk area. New Suffolk is a long established area of residential properties. These properties can be characterized a's year- round housing in the south and easterly portion of the community. This housing is on small plots with little potential building possible in the future. The remaining areas of ~ew Suffolk are summer residences on larger plots. There is little !iklihood of substantial ~dditional development in these areas. As a consequence, the present physical, chemical and quantity characteristics of the water resource at the subject site should remain unchanged into the forseeable future. Effects of the Proposed New Condominium~ Considerable improvemen~ to the water resources on the subject site will be realized upon construction of the condo- minium project. Sewage Disposal At present, an active boatyard with 12 employees ~nd many business patrons combine with an existing restaurant of 70-seat capacity to produce a sewage flow estimated at 4500 gal. daily. Sewage is presently disposed by septic tank and cesspool systems. The condominium project is estimated at 5400 gallons daily. However, in contrast with the restaurant which is a year-round operation, and the shipyard which is a 9-month operation, the condominium project is a 4-month activity. Denitrification of the sewage waste is required by the Dept. of Health. The condominium will therefore return to ground water an improved waste stream. The res61t will be a greatly reduced level of insult to the water resource. Water Demand At present, a single well of 15 gpm capacity located 75 feet west of the shipyard supplies a%l water used on the site. Consumptive use of water occurs .~s a consequence of the ship- yard activity. Boats are resupplied with water, but a large consumptive use occurs in the working and 'cleaning of boats. -5- Evaporation from their surfaces ~akes a fai~ portion of all water used on the. site. All this loss will cease upon construc- tion of the condominiums. The existing well ~11 be retained for ~se in the con- dominium~ project. It will be incorporated into the supply system represented by the proposed new w~lls. It will also operate in unison with these wells, further reducing the possibility of draw-down. ,P.E. Consulting Engineer -6- GOLDSMITH'S INLET PARK MATTITUCK CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS j Plocene("l TLR1- ARY~?) DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS ~TiLL DEPOSITS, UNDIFFERENTIATED MANNETTO GRAVEL SHORE, BEACH, AND SALT-MARSH DEPOSITS AND ARTI~!CIALFILL, UNDiFFERENTiATED HARBOR HILL GROUND MORAINE HARBOR HILL TERMINAL MORAINE RONKONKOMA GROUND MORAINE RONKONKOMATERMiNAL MORAINE OUTWASH DEPOSITS, UNDIFFEREN'i~iATED (; I $ I. () i 75 ft. west Lab No. Field No. Date: Time: Col. By: (Name not initials) Date Received in Lab Public Water Private Water Other Date Completed __ Examined By ~.~, _~ Point of Collection ~ ~6,--- ' SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORA~[ORY CHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER (1) Results Reported as Micrograms Per, Liter. M~n§anes? (mg,/I [,~n) J Cc~p~ (mg/I Cu) Zinc (mgll Zn} Sodium (mg/I Na) Fo, m I'~o. PHL-1 Complete T.Hardness {mgq C,'CO3) T. AlkaHnhy (mg/I C~CO3: Mg H;~ldness{mg ~ ,C,~C03) Sclcniu m (1) Cadre;urn Silver (1) Chromium (1) Mercury. (1) DIRECTOR 4-A Resample [-_~ E~r!um (mg/I Total Hyd P(mg/I) l ;b ,:o. 682537 Date 7- ~'~' -- Col. Public ~ater Priv~tu Water Other ---- ~ Date Con,p~eted ~-~_-~' £xam~ned By _~'~ ~f_ ~L SUFFOLK COb~TY DLPARTHLNT OF HEALTH CoERV]CES DIVI.q]ON GF F_ED]CAL 'LEGAL I~,%ZEST]GAT]ONS & FORENSIC SCIENCES ?UBLIC HEALTH I2=BO?~ATORY ~ofnt of Co~]ection co. . : ,'.;e thy ~er, e C,hl or:[ de ........... 250 cr,~,h ~ or e,me tkane ........... ~] 251 or cfo,~ ,~ .................... J~_ 1,1,1 ?rf cn]oroetkane ......... B~ cr~;- 2-Chi o: oetha ne ....... i~2 ~cb]c-c2: t?t ~ .......... 1,2 Tr~ch]~rceth]']ene ...... Chi ozod~br cmor. c thane ......... 2 D~ro=outhane ............. 2- Dr ex,D- l.-Ch~ or opt epa n e ...... Tctrach]oroethy] cn~. ~ ........ eon '113 ...~ ................ D~ br cmc::,e thane ............... 1,] Dlch]o[oethyl cr, e Co~ound ppb_ colu~r,e ......................... p-Xylc::e ....................... ),yx en~ ($) ...................... I .... Ch]o: o,~:enzcne .................. -~ ~ Et,,), ~ ~,C ...... e ................ Rzc. nDbenzcne ................... / ~ o-Ch3oro~o]uene ........... -- ~' {~ ' ~-Ch: o: et ol ut. ne ................. ~.{_..(~__ :-Chlo~ et ol uer;e ............... '-- Ch]oroto] uene (s) m-D~ ch]orot'er~ erie ............... _ o-Dich] orobenz er*e ............... ~ ~ p-Di chi orohcn2 erie ............... 1, 2,~ TriterNv]~-,cn~cr'e ....... '--- 2, 3 D4. ch]o:cp:o'P'-''ne ............. 1,1,2 ?[ichloroeth~ne ........... PEDNEAULT ASSOCIATES TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. (516) 589-1505 TO: Mahoney Engineering P.O. Box 117 East Islip, New York 11730 4040 SUNRISE HIGHWAY P,O, BOX 539 OAKDALE, NEW YORK 11769 July 12, 1982 Date: Collected ....7./?/..~.~. ....... Analyzed ...7./,~;!Q~. ......Report .....[/.1.2/.~? ...... Sampling Point 1. ~ .$~.f~.~ .~.z..~_..~..4 .~.~.~..,~,..~.4. fZ... ................................................. 2. N.o.r~,~. ?p.r~ .$1~g.~.~..d. W¢~..#. ~. ?~c.n.~..S~pi?~ ........................................ 3..~q~,~h..Fp.~. S. hZ.p.U.~..~. ~.p..-.~..3.0~.Z.. .................................................. 4..~q~b'.t .F.o.r.k.$~Z.p.U.~..d.W.e..l~..#..4.15..f~... ..................... . .... , .... ................ Parameters I 2 3 4 5 Chloride' mg/1 104.2 76.4 i 1419.4 25.8 pH 6.7 6.7 OrganZc Nitrogen rog/1 7.64 , 5.21 i Ammonia 'mq/l i 1.52 0.62 Nitrate rog/1 3.85 7.71 Nitrite .mg/1 0.012 0.025 Sulfa~e mg/1 , 29.5 32.0 Iron : mg/1 0.30 0.08 Manqanese re.q/1 0.09 0. I 0 JOHN PEDNEAUI'T Lab Number 23959 L~.C Lab Director PEDNEAULT ASSOCIATES TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. {516) 589.1505 TO: Mahoney Engineering P.O. Box 117 East Isllp, N~w York 11730 4040 SUNRISE HIGHWAY P.O. BOX 539 OAKDALE, NEW YORK 11769 June 7, 1982 Date: Collected ...'5/2~/~Z ....... Analyzed ....5,/27.-6/.4/.82 .... Report ....... 6,/~82 ..... Sampling Point 1..~rtJ~..Fork .Sk~. Y~d .N~J~ Suffolk .~etl. ~. 1.1.5.f~_ ..................................... Parameters I 2 3 4 5 Chloride mq/l 65.0 Man.qanese mg/l I < 0.01 I JOHN PEDNEAULT Lab Number 23759 Lab Director ~-D TO: PEDNEAULT ASSOCIATES TESTING LABORATORIES, INC, {516) 589.1505 Mahoney Engineering P.O. box 117 E~st Islip, New York 11730 4040 SUNRISE HIGHWAY P.O. BOX 539 OAKDALE, NEW YORK 11769 June 7, 1982 Date: Collected .....5,~ .27./.~2. ...... Analyzed .... .51¢TT4L4.1.8~... Report ...... 6./.71~¢.. ..... Sampling Point 1..~ .2¢..¢. ]../¢o.~..~.f.o.4.h. $h. 4'~ .Y.¢¢¢. ,~0. f~.~ .............................................. 2..w.e..l~..~..2.N. qr..th. ~.o.r.k. $t~4p. y¢¢¢. ~5..~.. ............................................. 3..~¢~ .~..1. $.ou.~fo.r~. $.h~:~ .Y?C.d. ~0. ~¢, ................................................ 4..W.e..~..~..2.N.,E...W... ~,~. ~, .......................................................... Parameters I 2 3 4 5 i ChlorZde mq/1 883.4 2581.0 80.4 116.1 JOHN PEDNEAULT Lab Director Lab Number 23759 : ! ! Cr~ TO ENGIneERING REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY (APRIL 1983) REVERSE OSMOSIS SEPTEMBER 1983 FOR MARINE ASSOCIATES INC. NEW SUFFOLK, N.Y. Prepared by John P. Mahoney, P.E.. Consulting Engineers P.O. Box 117 East Is!ip, N.Y. 11730 SUPPL~ENTARY ENGINEERING REPORT ON REVERSE OSMOSIS FOR MARINE ASSOCIATES INC. NEW SUFFOLK, N.Y. Status of Pro,eot The Dept. of Health Services has rejected the engineer- lng report on water supply dated April, 1985 (a copy of which accompanies this supplementary report). This rejection describes the water supply from the test well as "marginal" despite the chemical analysis of the water showing it to be within the potable water supply standards of the U.S.P.H.S. by reasonable amounts in all parameters tested. The acquifer from which this water was taken was subject to a pumping test beyond any stress it could expect in normal service. The Dept. of Health Services in its letter of rejection stated it wanted'"deeper wells which mitigate'my concern over sanitary quality, followed by advanced water treatment methodologies". In order to meet this demand for an absolute answer wherein neither quantity of the raw water source or quality of the treated water is in doubt, the water supply will be provided by means of a reverse osmosis treatment system. Reverse Osmosis The reverse osmosis system is an advanced water treatment methodology called for by the Dept. of Health Services. Reverse OsmoSis is a widely used, well proven method of water supply. It has demonstrated its reliability and feasibility in far larger and more diverse applications all over the world. Its use at this site represents hard- ship only in its relative expensive cost over the original proposal for water supply. On the accompanying plans, the location of the supply wells and the layout of the total water supply system is show~. Details of R.0. Water Supply System Two Culligan SWL 060 seawater reverse osmosis systems will be provided. Each will be equipt with its own 2" dia. well with the screen set at 70 f t. depth below grade. The normal feed rate is 11.9 gpm for each unit. The well capacity is 20 gpm. ~ominally rated at 6000 gpd, each system will pro- ducelapproximately 4500 gallons d3ily. This reduced output is a result of water temperature at 53° F and a stabilization point reached by the membranes of the unit after 15 months of operation. Nonetheless,~ sufficient redundancy is provided due to the nature of the ~o0. process° The major cause of failure is fo~uling of the membranes, i Since three cartri'dges comprise the uniX'each can be replaced with only a short ~shut down of the unit. The product water will meet U S P H S standards for drinking water. Environmental Considerations No detrimental effects to the environment can be anti- cipated as a result of the R.O. process. Seawater is taken at a depth of 70 ft. below grade. This is approximately 35 ft. below the bottom of the fresh water acquifer. Since only 5dO0 gallons a day are to be withdrawn, no distortion of the fresh water reservoir can be anticipated. Due to the denitrific~tion process required for the sewage disposal system, the net effect of the R.O. system is to increase the volume of fresh water in the acquifer. The denitrification process removes nitrogen from the waste stream. Since the tr~'ated sewage is discharged to the grotu~d water, the existing fresh water acquifer of New Suffolk is protected to some small degree by the desalinized water produced by the R.O~ system. -3- The proposed condominium project will replace an active boatyard and year-round restaurant. The R.O. ~ process provided for the condominium will result in the elimination of any demand upon the fresh water resources of New Suffolk. Sewage from both present activities on the~site will also be eliminated. On balance, the environmental impact of the proposed condominium project will be a substantial net gain through the elimination of any demand on the existing fresh water resourcem~n~ a tremendous reduction in the level of contaminsnts introduced into the ground water. Other components of the Water Supply System Two 3000 gal. storage tanks will be provided. Approximately one day's demand will be available in the event one of the R.O. units is dow~ for repairs. Standby chlorination is provided. Calculations on which the system sizing is based is included herewith. Technical details of the R.O. system are provided in the addendum. AugUst 16, 1983 -4- Page I la 2-2d 3-4 5 6 8-9 10-11 12 Insert Log of test well Chemical analysis of test well at 70 feet Calculations on performance and sizing of R.0. system Description of R.0. system Schematic of R.0. unit Layout of~ R.0. and water supply system Equipment ?erformance Specifications and Projections Diagrams of membrane and cartridge Technical Specifications Estimate of operational costs Site plan TO: PEDNEAULT ASSOCIATES TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. (516) 467-8477 M~Zn¢ A~soc~zte~, Inc. No4t~ Fo~k Shipy~d~ N~ $~ffo&, N~ Yo~k 11956 1615 NINTH AVENUE Date: Collected ....6/.~.4/.~. ....... Analyzed ...~./.~.4.-,~p,/~,~..'... Report .. ~1,~0/.~,~ ......... Sampling Point 1.. ~q~ .~. ~:P.~. $/~;~.y~. :. ~ .~ ...................................................... 2.. ~/q~..~. ~:.o.~, $/~p~. :. 4 ~ .~; ...................................................... 3..~o.~h./:p.~.$/~.: .~ .~ .................................................... 4../~q~h. ~p.~/~.$/~p~.: .~,.~.~. ................................................... ~.. ~/o.~. l~.$hip~. :. 7.~ .~.~. .................................................... Parameters I 2 3 4 5 Chloride mg/1 3375 15634 15485 15733 157~? Total Dissolved Solids mq/1 6268 37230 47376 42134 40144 Am~onid mq/£ 6.96 0.366 0.062 0.317 0.686 Nitrate mg/1 3.29 0.44 0.24 0.23 0.28 Nit, itc ~/£ 0.0~ 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.003~ Me~y~ne B~c Ac~vc Sub~nce mq/l ~0.05 ~0.05 ~0.05 <0.05 <0.05 JOHN PEDNEAULT Lab Director Lab Number 26058 WATER ANALYSIS* (Sample taken at 70 feet: after 2 hours pumping at 20 gpm) : Mg/1 as CaCO3 Calcium 720 Magnesium 3,700 Sodium t7,000 Potassium N/A Chloride 20,000 Sulfate 2,580 Nitrate None Bicarbonate 120 Silica 9.6Mg/1 as Si02 pH 7.4 *Analysis performed at Culligan Laboratories, North- brook, Ill. -la- -2a,~- -2b- -2C- AQUA-CLEER SWL SERIES R.O. SEWATER CONVERSION SYSTEM SYSTEM DESCRIPITON INTRODUCTION The Aqua-Cleer SWL Series is designed for conversion of seawater to drinking water using the Reverse Osmosis process. The unit ha~ been des'igned for use on a seawater well.' The natural filtration of the earth surrounding the well minimizes the need for pretreatment. The need for polymer feed for removal of iron from the feed water can be eliminated by use of plastics, fiberglass or lined c~rbon stee% pipe in the feed system. It is also recommended tha~ non-corrosive materials be' used in the seawater feed pumps as well. The system is designed for continuous operation or can be operat- ed from a tank level switch. Operator attention is required once daily to monitor system Performance. SYSTEM OPERATION (Refer to Aqua-Cleer SW-L Flow Diagram) A-20 antiscalant is injected into the raw seawater to prevent scale formation. The seawater is filtered through a 5 micron filter. The filter housing is all plastic construction and houses replaceable filter elements. The filtered seawater is pressurized to 800-1000 psi by the high pressure~pump. The high pressure pump and R.O. modules are protected from over-pressurization by a relief device at the pump discharge. 5.. The high pressure seawater passes through R.O. Modules. T~ R.O. module produces fresh water from seawater. The concentrated brine from the module flows through a needle valve which regulates the system pressure. Product water flows from the R.O. module to the unit storage tank which provides product water required to flush the R.O. system at shutdown. The forward flush syst%m allows product water to be drawn through the system by the high pressure pump. This rinses the salt from the system vhich prevents membrane dry out and corros'ion during normal shutdown. -3-- . SWL SERIES SYSTEM DESCRIPTION C. ELECTRICAL CONTROLS The Electrical Control System consists of two circuits, a high voltage circuit for the high pressure pump motor and a low voltage circuit for the electrical controls. Ail m~tor starters and electrical controls are housed in NEMA 12 enclosures. Other voltages are available. Pump operation will be interrupted by low pump suction press6re. The motor cannot be restarted until corrective action has been taken and the circuit reset. The low pressure shut-down may be locked out while the forward flush cycle is operated. 1. Safety Circuit The safety circuit is for: low pump suction pressure. This situation will result in shut-down of the high pressure pump, and when activated will close a set of auxiliary contacts. The auxiliary contacts are provided for connection of a remote alarm system. The contacts will remain closed until the circuit is reset. D. SEAWATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Seawater must be supplied to the system at the flow rates and pressures specified on the equipment Specifications Sheet. The seawater should be free from iron corrosion products. Therefore, the system including the feed pump, must be cpnstructed from non~corrosi~ve materials. Culligan recommends that the feed pump be made from non-corrosive materials and that 'the supply piping an~ well Rasing be of PVC, fiberglass or other non-corrosive construction. If 'the source of the seawater supply is from an ocean intake or corrosive materials are used for the seawater feed system, additional pretreatment may be required. Culligan can recomm:end and supply all pretreatment equipment necessary. -4- LEGENI) 9 l 0 Il 12 13 .I4 15 }"i ] tcr Ih-ctl'catcd l'hltcr-S;unple Valve 7 Fllter-l'ressure Gauge Two-llav Valve Ilit;l~ Pl'eSStll-O Pump/Hotor F il~cr-::an:ple Port Check Vhlvc R.O. ?lodul(,-lnlet Prcssul-e Gauge 16 R.O. Hodule-lligh Pressure llose 17 R.O. Nodule-lh'ine Reject llose 18 R.O. Nodule-l~rine Snmpl.e ~':'"'~ 19 Vent Valve .. II--I- 20 ]lever~e Osmosis Module 21 Product Out]et-Sample Valve 22 FI owback Tank 23 Product llater-Pressure Rel ief Valve 24 Product lqater-Outlet Pressure 25 Product lqater-Conductivity Ntmitor (Optional) 26 Product i'lator-Neter/Accumulator 27 Tcmperatut'e Indicator . . 21~ SologoJd Operated Va:lye (Optional) 29 Brine Rejeet-l~]o~o Control Valve 30 l/ejcct Iqater Flow }Ieter 31 Cleaning Pump (Optional) osNQs~5 UNiT ~,0o0 PI, tE.~ tCU~T im-- I I W-CLL ~-4OUSE. PLAN Z C~46-~K ',¢A.L",/E- NWNT~R ~U PI~Y ~¥~-FE.I~ MODEL: A. EQUIPMENT PERFOR~CE SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECTIONS SWL-060 DESIGN BASIS Feed Water Analysis Reference Total Dissolved Solids (ppm) Silt Density Index (SID) Design Temperature (°C) Minimum Pressure (bar-psi) Required Flow Rate (M3/hr-GPM) Product1 Nominal Flow Rate (M3~day-GPD) Minimal Quality (ppm TDS) STD Seawater 35,000 3.0 25 2.8 / 40 2.7 / 11.9 '22.7 / 6000 500 1.8 / 7.7 53,600 Waste Nominal Flow Rate (M3/hr-GPM) Nominal Concentration (ppm TDS) ELECTRIC POWER Power Supply Required Total Power Required - avg. R.O. Pump Motor 230 V/60 Hz/1 phase 5.7 KW I0.0 HP %EFC EncloSure -?a- Equipment Performance Specifications and Projections MODEL: SWL-060 PIPING Low Pressure ~ Piping ~ Type 1, Grade 1, sch 80 PVC Fittings Type 1, Grade 1, sch 80 PVC (threaded) (socket welded) High Pressure Piping 316 Stainless Steel, sch 80 Fittings 316 Stainless Steel, min 2000 psi COATING AND PAINTING R.O. Skid Entire System (after fabrication/testing) SYSTEM DIMENSIONS R.O. Skid Height (M/Ft) Width (M/Ft) Length (M/Ft) Weight, Dry (Kg/lbs) Conforming to ASTM D-1785 ASTM D-2464 ASTM D-2467 ANSI B 36.19 ANSI B 16.11 Zinc Primed ~Epoxy Painted 1.4 / 4.58 .84 / 2.75 1.47 / 4.83 680 / 1500 -?b- Technicallspecificatioms SWL Series INSTRUMENTATION (cont'd) Product Quantity A water meter is included in the product water line to indicate the total production of the system. Flow Indicators A rotometer mounted by the control panel allows constant readout of reject flow rate. Sampte Ports Sample ports allow the pressure and water quality of the feed, brine reject, and product water to be measured for each individual module. Ela?sed Time Monitor To help schedule routine maintenamce of the high pressure pump, an elapsed time meter is provided to record pump operation hours. Safety Devices To prevent damage to the unit, shut down will occur due to low pump suction pressure. This prevents pump damage due to pump starvation caused by restricted feed flow. High and low pressure relief valves assure protection of piping from pressure surges. If additional pretreatmen~ is required, additional interlocks will be included as needed to prevent system damage. G. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM Ail necessary electrical components and cabling are provided with the unit. Ail control components are located within NEMA 12 panel. Electrical installation requires only a single 230 volt, 60 Hertz, single phase connection. Conduit and Cable Conduit'runs shall be heav9 wall, rigid aluminum with aluminum fittings or flexible liquid-tight conduit. -?C- '~ No.. 276 Du Pont Company, Polymer Products Dept., Permasep* Products Wilmington, DE 19898 PERMASEP® PERMEATOR MODEL NO, 6840-063N 8" DIAMETER B-10 PERMEATORS PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS Membrane type B-10 aramid Membrane configuration Hollow fiber Shell dimensions 10-3/8" OD x 8-1/2" ID x 59" long · . (264 cm OD x 21 6 cm ID x 1499 cm Iong) Shell material FilamenI-wound fiberglass epoxy End plates and segmented rings Fiberglass epoxy Connections Feed, product and brine 3/4" femare. NPT Brine sample. 3/8" female, NPT Permeator weight, filled with water 225 pounds (102 kg) )perating position Horizontal or verlical Initial product water capacity' 6300 gpd (23.85 m~/day) nominal + 10% Salt passage' ~< 1 5% Rated operating pressure~n 800-1,000 psig (5,515-6895 kPa) Temperature range~ 32 '-95'F (0~-35 C) pH range3, Continuous exposure 4-9 Minimum brine rate 6,000 9pd (2271 m~/day) / 10,100 gpd (382 mVday) Maximum brine rate 40.000 gpd (151 4 mUday) Open Ends Brine Outlet Epoxy Tube Sheet ~of Fibers. 'O' Ring Seal / Flow Screen % ~c ~ / ~. ~-~ ~ ...... ~~~ ~~ Segmented Ring / ' P / ~Segmented -8- 8-INCH MODEL 6840 REPLACEMENT PARTS'LIST PART NO. DESCRIPTION MATERIAL REFERENCE · NO. REQ'D. 6840-1 SHELL FIBERGLASS PP-108192 1 6840-2 END PLATE-FEED FIBERGLASS PP-200292 1 ~013 END PLATE-PRODUCT ~:IBER(~L-~§S PP~'200290 1 6840-4 SUPPORT BLOCK (POROUS) ALUMINA 1 6840-5 FEED TUBE ~--VC PP-200145 1 6840-6 O-RING,END PLATES BUNA-N RUBBER NO. 2-266.8.26" O.D. x 7.98" I.D. x 0.139" THK. 3 & TUBE SHEET 6840~7 O-RING, FEED TUBE BUNA-N RUBBER NO.2-131,,1.88" O.D, x 1.67" I.D, x 0,103" THK. 2 6840-8 .... SEGMENTED RING FIBERGLASS PP-300084 ' 2 6840-9 CAP SCREW STAINLESS STEEL 318"16UNCxl"LG. SOCKET HEAD CAP SCREW 12 . 6840-10 SUPPORT SCREEN PLASTIC NETTING r~.~EA,O. ~E~ PERMASEP' PERMEATOR 8-INCH MODEL 6840 VIEW B-B VIEW A-A TECHNICAL SPEC%FICATION AQUA-CLEER SWL SERIES SEAWATER REVERSE OSMOSIS SYSTEMS REVERSE OSMOSIS POLISHING FILTER A 5 micron filter provides protection against ~article fouling of the modules. Five micron, filter elements are employed in the~ plastic filter housing. B. HIGH PRESSURE PUMPS The high pressure pump increases the filtered seawater to its operational pressure of 800-1000 psi. A high efficiency plunger type pump is utilized in the AQUA-CLEER System. No special tools or skills are required. Ail wetted parts are aluminum-bronze, ceramic or stainless steel to assure corrosion resistance. Flow through accumulators provide surge-free feed to the R.O. modules. REVERSE OSMOSIS MODULES DuPont B-10 aramid hollow fiber permeators are used in Culligan seawater converters. Since their commerical introduction in 1973, they have been econmically desalting highly brackish and seawaters worldwide. Ihe long term performance of these membranes has been proven, and ongoing research' at DuPon[ is continually expanding their applicability. , D. FLOWBACK TANK P~oduct wate~ flows directly to the flowback tank. This tank provides a- s~pply of fresh water required to flush the R.O. system at shut down. The forward flush system allows product water to be drawn through the system by the high pressure pump. This rinses the salt from the system thus preventing membrane dry out and corrosion due to stagnant seawater during normal shut down. If power to the unit is lost, natural osmosis will draw water from this tank back into the modules to prevent membrane dehydration. -lO- Technical Specification SWL Series E. PIPING AND VALVES All valves and piping are of high strength, corrosion resistant materials. High pressure components are constructed of 316 stainless steel. Piping is schedule 80 with 316 SS 2,000 lb. fittings or ~welded construction. Pressure.relief %alves p~otact piping from inadvertent over pressure. Ail valves were chosen for their reliability and simplicity of operation. Two way ball and needle valves 'of PVC and 316 'SS provide 'flow control in the system. Pipes and fittings conform to the following"specifica~i0ns: Low pressure pipe ASTM D-1785 Low pressure fittings (less than 1.5") ASTM D-2464 Low pressure fittings (1.5 and greater) ASTM D-2467 High pressure pipe ANSI B 36.19 High pressure pipe fittings ANSI B 16.11 F. INSTRUMENTATION All instrumentation is conveniently mounted to 'facilitate 'system monitoring. Pressure Gau~es Corrosion resistant glycerine filled gauges with Kemx isolaters are used to prolong service life. High pressure gauges are 0~1500 psi range and are installed on the feed manifold of the modules. Low pressure gauges are 0-20Q psi range. Ail gauges are mounted for reading ease. Temperature Seawater feed temperature is measured with a stainless steel bimetallic type thermometer. Filters1 (ea) ESTIMAIED OPERATING COSTS SWL 060 SERIES Units/1000 Gal. Unit Cost Produced $ 2.95 .125 $/1000 Gal. Produced .37 A-20 AntiscalantI (lb) Modules2 (ea) Poweri(KWH) Maintenance Supplies/Labor Module Cleaning3 1.86 .12 .22. 9,028.00 .00009 .84 .05 23.1 1.16 10.00 .05 .50 Actual operating costs are dependent on many variables. Energy consumption fluctuates with seawater salinity and unit operating pressure. Unit costs will vary with plant location. Above is typical of a system operating on standard seawater at 25°C. Labor costs are averaged across the series and based on part time attendance. This cost generally decreases as the system capacity increases. NOTES: Based on monthly, replacement Based on five year life Module cleaning costs depend on location of membrane treatment station. If optional cleaning equipment is included w~th system, the cost/1000 gallon produced is $.07. This is based on four cleaning per year. --G "Presetting Your Bit of History" The Peconic Bay Shopper June 7, 1983 THE "HOLLAND" Pride of New Suffolk .. By Sam Sander uffolk County's Tercentary Celebration now ~ls the air. No story h of her contribution to our country would be complete without ? mention of John P. Holland and his submarines. An important site of his activities was the waterfront around the foot of Main Street, New Suffolk where the Galley-Ho Restaurant is now situated. Here was the Goldsmith & Tuthill Shipyard and its basin. Around 1960 this was re- placed by the present North Fork Shipyard. The idea of a subn~ersible boat that could run unseen under the water has been in the mind of men of science for centuries. A Dutchman, Cornelius Van Drebbel, designed a craft for King James I of England which was rowed beneath the surface of the Thames in 1620. Twelve rowers propelled it at a depth of 12 to 15 feet for several hours. In 1776, David Bushnell of Saybrook designed the '~rurtle" which attempted to blow up the British battleship "Eagle" in New York Harbor. The plan was to fix a gunpowder charge with time fuse to the warship's bottom by a screw. Attempts to force the screw through the copper sheath failed, and the submarine rowed away, releasing the cha~ge without damage. This was the in-st submarine to be tried for war purposes. During the Civil War on the night of February 17th, 1864, the Confederate submarine, "Hunley" blew up the U. S. S. "Housatonic" as it was blockading Charleston Harbor. It was sunk by a spar torpedo fitted over the bow of the submarine. The sob then swamped through an open hatch, sank and was lost with her crew of nine men. The loss of the "Housatonic" is the first known instance of the sinking of a warship by a submarine. .And now for a few words about our hero, John Philip Holland, who was born in Ireland in 1840 and died in Newark, New Jersey August 12th, 1914. He is known as an inventor and pioneer in marine design and construction. As a youth he thought of building a submersible craft to be used against the British Navy for Irish independence. By 1870 he had plans for soch a boat but no financing. In 1872 he emigrated lo the United States and settled in Paterson, New Jemey. Shortly thereafter he started to work on submarine design and arranged to have the building of his craft contracted. On May 17th, 1897, his 53 foot "Holland" was launched at Lewis Nixon's Shipyard,Eliaabeth- port, New Jersey. It was the £~rst submarine with an internal combustion Subsequently, on February 24th, 1898, it was moved to Raritan Dry Dock at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. On St. Patrick's Day, 1898, the boat made its first successful run submerged. Lieutenant Nathan Sargent led the Naval Board in reviewing the trial runs at that time. Thereafter the steering and firing mechanisms were further tel'med. The boat was then shifted to the Erie Basin, Brooklyn, for a while. The busy waters of New York Harbor almost caused disaster several times to the submarine. On June 5th and 6th, 1899, the boat was towed via Long Island Sound and, Greenport to New Suffolk. Here at the Goldsmith & Tuthill Yard the two recently formed enterprises, the Holland Torpedo Boat Company and the Electric Boat Company,* estab- fished their base. A marked three-mile course in Little Peconic Bay east of Little Hog Neck (now Nassau Point) was completed in July,. 1899 and the perfecting of the "Holland" continued through the remainder of the summer. There was a well-pubficized submerged run with Clara Barton, Founder of the American Red Cross Society, aboard. She was the f'n'st woman to travel beneath the water's surface. On October 1 lth there was an exciting affair when crew and guests were overcome by exhaust fumes as "Holland" glided unmanned into the dock at Goldsmith and Tuthill basin. This incident was written up in Engineer Morris's diary. After the November, 1899 test before the Third Naval Board, the "Holland" left New Suffolk for the Washington Navy Yard on the Potomac, arriving in the middle of December. During this passage along the inland waterways spectators lined the shores. The submarine was accepted by the Navy and commissioned April 1 lth, 1900. The price was $150,000. Today's nuclear submarines cost in the millions. Six similar boats of which the "Holland" was the prototype were subsequently ordered by the Government. Holland also built submarines for Great Britain, Russia and Japan. Mattituck Laundromat General Laundrv &,~ Blankets * Bedspreads * Sleeping Bags Cumins * Drapes * Ru~ up to 25 Ib.~ I~/ ~ Commercial Sheet & Towel Se~ice k~/I The U.S.S. Hollond on test course durin~7 the summer of 1899, P. Holland is on Boor& (Photo Courtesy Dean Blaikie) In 1904 the inventor built a respirator, a device to'enable the ct, members to escape from a disabled submarine. This man devoted life to the development of submarines. It i~s said that his design for propulsion was vktua!ly unchanged fror~ his time until the advent of atomic submarine. As a fitting conclusion, let us quote from a historical marker pl;; at the intersection of Main and First Streets,. New Stfffolk by the C chogue-New Suffolk Historical Council: "This marks the site of the first sobmarine base in this cour where "U.S.S. Holland" tn'st submarine commissioned by the Un States Navy, was based for trials. In the period between 1899 and 1 six other submarines of the'Holland Torpedo Boat Company were b; at this site which was known as the Holland Torpedo Boat Stat Naval maneuvers between sobmarines and the U.S.S. Torpedo k, Destroyer "Windsor" of Spanish War fame were held in these wate *It should be mentioned that the Electric Boat Company surviving enterprise, later moved to Groton, Connecticut, and becam purveyor of nuclear submarines to the Navy. It is now a Division of Ge Dynamics. All thc Savings Ban} Services youql cvcrnccd Hish Y~ld ~avi ngs. Free Checking and Fasy Household SOUTHOLD. ~t4175 ~in Rd., (S 16) 76S-2~O0 PONT JEFFERSON STA., ~J20k:l Tovm Rd ~ Nesconset Hwy.. (S 16) 47t-7000 Mend~e F.D.I.(:. F. qtml Homing Lender Looking east from intersection of Main St. and First Stl Post Office and Marine Associates office in background. Looking east from First St. past storage building. Restaurant ~n background. Looking generally east from northwest corner First St. and Main St. Note height of old buildings which obstruct views Looking east from First St south of intersection with Main St. This area is filled with stored boats during the winter. Looking east from First St. near south end of property. Deteriorating maintenance and storage building is shown. Looking east near north end of property. Restaurant is red building in right background. Open area is taken up by boats during off season. Looking west from boat basin. Post Office/Marine Associates building is behind large white boat. Main St. is in back of travel lift. Looking northwest from boat basin. Post Office/Marine Associates building on left, restaurant on tight. Looking southwest from filled pier toward storage building near south side of property. Looking north from walk around basin. Tom~ of S~thold Suffolk County, New York LEAD ACENCY: Town of Southold To%~ Boa~tl Town Hall Southold, ~iY ]1971 LF2~0 AGF~CY COI~TACT PERSON: Judith T. Terl'y, Town Clerk PREPAI ,~U~ BY: Roy L. Haje~ President Eh-Consultants, !nc. 6l; North ~in Street Southampton, New York 11968 List of appendices ......................................... 1 gu/tonally .................................................... 2 Description of Action ...................................... 3 Description of Enviromaental Setting ....................... 5 Location .............................................. ~ Environmental features of site ............................. OeolodQr and soils .................................... Slopes sad Topography I~nd Poz~s ........................................... ~ineral Resources .................................... Erosion and se~entation potential ................... IIydro!osy ............................................ Surface Water ..................................... Ground Water ...................................... Ecology ............................................... Ve6et~tion ................................ ~ ....... ~{ild!ife ........................................... Land Use .............................. Historical Resources .1 .......... l[iiiillllllill ........ Visual Character ...................................... Exist~g envirorm~ental constraints affecting action ........ Statement of Enviro]~ental effects ......................... Identification of any adverse effects which cannot Le avoided .................................................... Description of mitigation measures to minimize adverse effects ................................................... Identification of any irreversible and irretrievable ~cc~m~itments of ~esOurces ........ ..... ................ . ..... Description of and growth-inducing aspects of 'the ac~ Lo~ ............ ....... .......... ..... . .............. ~a pact of the action on ~e use and conservation Of enerjy .... ...... ..o ...... · ....... . ...... . ......... .. .... 5 5 7 7 7 7 7 7 lO 13 14 19 19 2O 2O 21' DescripLion a~d evaluation of reasonable alternatives to achieve the same of similar objectives ................. 21 List o£ ^ppenRice$ 3. 4. 5. 6. l¥oposed site plan by St~phen Shilowitz, A.I.A. Map of North Fork Shipya~ by Roderick Van T~yl, P.C., Aug. 21, 1982. Sanitary se~ge system~ and w~ter bn~pply system by John P. Mahoney, P.E. Engineers report of ~.ater supply and sewage system. The "Holland" Pride of New Suffolk. '~ne Peconic Bay Shopper, June, 1983. ~p to accompany application for change of zone from "C" to "M-l" for Marine Associates~ Inc. by Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. Feb. 16, 1983. Photographs of site taken July, 1983 by J.A. Kenniff. -1- The applic~t ~rine Associates Inc, proposes a change of zone-of the present ~{or~b Fork Shlpya~i, zoned "C" Light Industrial to "M-i" General Multiple Residence. Such a zone change ~ould allow the applicants to pursue other approvals necessary to construct a 24 unit condn~f~ium cc~plex. The upland acreage is S.4~ acres. An additional .22 acres ~Ill be added with the abandor,ment of the dead-end First St. ~Iditional acreage is the subject of a NYS Land Grant and consists mainly of land underwater. The site presently contains several buildings, sc~e in advanced stages of deterioration~ ~ich were used in the operation of the shipyard. Due to a steeply econGnic decline~ the shipyard has virtu~ ~y ceased operation. A restaurant seating 85 people plus 12 at the bar continues to operate in ~ building bordering the bullcheaded marina. The New Suffolk Post Office operates out of leased quarters which it shar~s wit2~ the North Fork Shipyard - ~rine Associates offices. A sem~-enclosed, 24+_ boat capacity marina is presently less than half ~1~1 as the shipyard operations are phased out. The issues which have been identified with the proposed condominium project are: 1. Availability of potable water 2. Conversion of waterfront property to multiple use 3- "Overintensification" of resources 4. Comparability of project with neighborhood 5- El~mtuation of "historic site" The parcel is located in the hamlet of New Suffolk~ Town of Southold~ Suffolk County~ N.Y. The Southold Town Board has been designated as "lead agency" as provided for in the New York State Environmental %,ality P~view Act (SEQR) and has --2-- issued a "positive declaration" requiring the preparation of this document. It is responsible for determining whether a change of zone should be - approved. Site plau approval must be granted by the SouthQld Planning Board. Approval for the abandonment of Main Street from First Street eastward must be granted by the Town Board. ~e Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDH) must approve the sanitar~y system and water supply. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (~knfSDEC) clafm~ Jurisdiction over tidal Waters and adjacent areas within 300' of the landward edge of wetlands or waters, except where substant~-~ man-made improvements (bulkheads, roads~ etc. ) lie between the proposed project and the waterway. (See Part 661, Land Use Regulations, sect. 661.4(b)(2) for full definition. ) In this instance, DEC Jurisdiction is limited to the area south of Main Street. Descriotion of Action 'i~e applicant seeks all necessary approvals to construct a 24 unit con- dominium ccEplex. The units will be arranged in six 4-unit clusters. maximum height of the units will be 35'. To co~ply with flood plain ~the first floor elevation must be +8' above MSL. Approximately ?000 cu yards of fill must be trucked in to raise the present grades to the +8' elevation. · ~!l units will have 2 bedro~ns. ~he driveways and parking areas w111 have a crushed bluestone surface (subject to Town approval) to facilitate drainage. T~e reader is referred to the architect's site plan found in the appen- dices for an overall view of the project. SewaA, e disposal will be accGnplished on-site by a nitrifying-~enitrifying s~,,;tc:~ which wil] recharcc the 'treated e£flu~nt back into the 6r~nd. Potable ~ter wilt be supplied by t~ on-site ~lls. ~verse osmosis equipment ~ be installed to remove chlorides. For design details: ~e ~er is refer~d to the cons~ting eng~eer's dr~%~ngs and ~eport in the appendices. 'iSe p~cel has been o%med by the principals since 1960 ~d has been opened as a shipya~ ~til recent t~es ~en the operation h~s been phased ~t. ~e ships~ ~s purchased fr~ the '~thiH f~i~ ~o o~ed and opera- · ted it fr~l 1~2 to 19~0. In ~dltion to the ship,S, it ~s used as a s hiz~ping centcr~ c~ and l~er ~re two of the most ~port~t shipped. ~i~ the decline in ~:~po~ce of sm,.1]-sc~e shippi~, this aspect of the operation ~. Perhaps the most notable t~ in the ship~ histo~ ~ ~ 1899 ~en it ~s the h~e port ~d test site for the "Ho~d" the first sub~lne c~issioned by ~e U.S. Na~. T~ay, a~ that re,ins of that event is an hlstoric~ marker at First St~et ~ b~ Steer ~ich ~ks ~e site. An article ~ich apDea~ed in a loc~ paper is included in the appendices ~ich ~ives a ~ller accost of the ~ri~. ~is se~nt of the site~ histo~ is also discussed ~ a later section. It ~s during the prior o~ership that the present buttings were constz~dcted. Most were used for b~ sbo~e ~d/or ~te~ce. Several a~ in an advanced stage of deterioration. D~fic~ties in securing approvals to rehabilitate these build~gs ~d the v~g~ies of ope~ting a success~ boatya~ led ~e o~ers to at,don the ope~tion ~d seek approves for current project. ~e need for the project~ as ~rceived by its proponent, derives fr~ the continuing d~d for ~r~ont ho~g ~ its declin$~ ava~bility. -4- 'Ibc usual anemities of waterfront living plus thc unique asset of a private on-site boat basin will ~ake the units attractive to those who desire a luxury "second-ho~e" and o~m, or intend to own a boat as well. It is anticipated that work will be completed i year after issuance oF all necessary approvals. Description of Environmental Sett~n~ Location The site is located in the hamlet of New Suffolk, Town of Southold, Suffolk Comuty, Long Island, New York. It is bounded on east by Cutchogue Harbor, on the south by waterfront property zoned light industrial n.o.f. Southold Development Corp., on the west by First Street and on the north by a small, light industrial parcel n.o.f. Loria. A map showing the sur- rounding uses within 500' has been prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl, L.S.~ and is included in the appendices. Environmental features of site Oeolo.%y and soils As iudicated on sheet 17 of Soil Survey of SuffoM~ County~ ~w York (USDA 1975) ~he bulk of the parcel is "cut and fill land, gently eloping (cut". It is described as follows: "Cut and fill land is made up of areas that have been altered in grading operations for housing developments, shopping centers, and similar nonfarm uses. Generally the initial grading consists of cuts and fills for streets or parking lots. During this phase, excess soil material is stockpiled for final grading and topdressing arouud houses or other buildings. Areas of Cut and fill land contain deep cuts in or near the sandy substratum of the soil o~:~sandy fills of 28 inches or more. Generally, cuts are so deep or fills so thick that identification of soils by series is not possible. The soil material ma~ing up the upper hO inches of this unit cont~utns as much as 12 inches of sandy lo~m or silt loam in sc~e places. The 28 inches that re- main are loamy fine sand or coarser textured material. -5- gut and ~ill land is generally associated with ~a~'ver s~ud P3~q~outh soils. The soil material that ren~in~ attar grading oper- ations e~re. completed has low available moisture capa- city~ is dr~ghty~ and is low to vez~y low in natural £ertility. The areas of Cut and fill land have severe limi- tations to use in establishing and maintaining lawus and landscaping. ?ne areas are not suited to faz~ing operations because of the ~lteration of existing soil material and the presence of buildings and other works of man. Cut and fill land~ Ment~.y sloping (cLrB) - This unit is made up of level to gently sloping areas that have been cut and filled /'or nonfarm uses. Slopes range frc~ i to 8 percent; and because of final grading around houses and other buildings, slopes generally are cc~plex. The areas generally are large, but some areas are about 5 acres in size. A sm~l~ portion of the parcel on the southerly end is classified as "f~]~ ~and, sandy (Fs)~" whose description follows: "Fill land, s~z~dy (Fs)is made up of areas where saudy fill ~aterial has been placed on sc~ewhat pDorly drained, poorly drained, or very poorly drained soils to provide building sites. In places thin layers of loam or silt loam soil material are in the sandy fill. The thickness of the fill ranges frcm about l~z feet to 20 feet; however, thick- ness generally is about 4 to l0 feet. Slopes are mostly nearly level~ but range to 8 percent where areas are gra- ded around buildings. The sources of f~l] material used in this unit are variable; consequently~ the fills are a heterogeneous mix- ture of sand and gravel that contain varying amounts of finer soil material. In places portions of fills have been made by using nonsoil materia!s~... Fill ~.mn¢l~ ssz~ty is mostly along the ~terfront and is used as building sites. It is not suited to most other uses. Onsite investigation is needed to determine the suitability of individual az-eas for building sites..." A test hole dug by the consulting engineer is shown on sheet 1 of 2 of the w~ter supply and sanitary set,ge system drawings. It confirms the description given in the soil survey. Slopes and topography A benc~na~ located near the Post Office indicates an elevation of 5.6~'. As can be seen frc~ the other elevations shown on the survey~ grades vaz~ little throuchout and approximate el~vation +5 '. The flatness of the site wus necessary for the safe operation of shipyard. L~nd Forms No land forms of any geologic significance are located here. and fill operations created the land over 100 years ago. Cut Mineral Resort ces None known. Erosion and se~%~entat$on potential The fast water percolation rate through sand plus the flatness of the terrain c~bine to cause little erosion and/or sedimentation. ~ktrther protection frc~ both are afforded by the bulkheads which line the northerly half (+.) of the parcel. Shoreline erosion of the sandy beach on the southerly half (+) is controlled by several timber groins extending into C,utchogue IS~rbor. Hydrolo~ Surface Water The parcel faces Cutchogue Harbor, a part of ?econic Bay on the east. It is a tidal body of wnter whose range is approximately 2.5'. The ~tYSDEC has classified it as SA, 'the hi~ohest classification for tidal waters. These waters are "... suitable for shelfishing for ~arket purposes and ~l?imary and secondary contact recreation." 5he area is presently open to shellfishing (personal ccmmmnicationiS/15/83, Jan~s Re~an, NYSDEC at Stony Brook) Groundwater Au engineers report by John Mahoney:P;E. is attached and made part -7- of this statement. It addresses existing groundwater conditons and the proposed ~ter supply. The parcel lies within Zone IY. North Fork. and Eastern South Fork, as delineated in the "208 Study" (Nassau-Suffolk i~egional Planning Board~ 1978). "The aquifer underlying the North Fork is of locally marginal w~ter quality ma~y in areas underlying farms. Also~ there is the potential for saltwater intrusion if pumping patterns a~e not carefully managed..." %'~ithin zone ZV, "agricu~tu~l fertilizer nitrogen is the donmant gro~u~dwater pollutant..." therefore "...the benefits of sewering are not ~oroDortionally as greai~ as for other zones... Rechar~;e or stre~ augmen- tation ~ith tertia~y t~eahment would be ~e n~ost environmentally favorable. Washed,abet Treatment Plan option because of the l~osjtive effect on preser~ ring the present W~ter level of str~a~us ~nd wetlands..." (208 Study) %~ile there are no streams or wetlands to be effected, recharg~ of the ~astewater wi~_l be done to prevent saltwater encroac~nent. Ecolo~.~f Vef~etat ion During the rummy years of operation of the shipyard, the ~ surface which w~s not taken up by buildings and automobile parking was used for storage of boats. The presence of ~y substantial vegetation would have inhibited access to the stored craft for maintenanc% launching, etc. ~erefore, o~ly low grasses and weeds now vegetate the open areas. Wildlife Here again the long history of rather intense use has li~ted the types of wildlife to those able to survive close proxi~ity 'bo such activities. During several visits to the site, a list of an~als noted ~as kept. _8. Birds noted can be divided into two categories: upland and shorebirds/ waterfowl. Of the former~ mouzuuing doves, sparrows~ robins, grackles, swallows and starlings were noted. The latter was represented by $~] I s and tez~s. Several species of ducks use the nearby waterways for nesting, feeding, etc. These include or may include; mallard, merganser, canvasback, blackduck, redhead, scaup. Obscrvations of ms~al s during site visits indicated cottontail rabbit and mice (probably meadow voles). 8m~ll baitfish and Juveniles of larger species are expected to i~babit the shallows of the adjacent bay. The most cc~on of these are: the four spine sticl~leback~ Apeltes quadracus; striped killifish, Fu~d~us ma,ialis; common killifish, ~udulus Heteroclitus~ s~eeps~ead m~=now~ C.yprinodon varieMat~s; silversides, ~nidia menidia; eel, An~illa rostrata; *winter flounder~ Pseudo~euronectes sm~r~canus; northern searobin, Prion~t~$ carolinus~ ~oluefish, Pomatus saltatrix; weakfish~ C.ynoscion reh~al%s; *$~m~erflounder (better known as fluke) P&ralichth.ys dent~tus; (~Sc~e of the more pol~lar to anglers.) The nearby Peconic Bay waters also sustain ninny of the bivalve mollusks; e.g. softshell clsm~ Mya mre~aria; hardshell clam, ~cenaria merccnaria; scallo, Pccte~ i~-~-adians; and the gastropod mollusk~ Conch. Fot~ling organ~ma on the docks~ Jetties and rocks include mussels, Mytilus e~lulis; barnacles~ Ball,us balauqides; ship worm~ Teredo navalis$ and sponges. Other typical invertebrates may include mud snails, Nassa obso~eta; Deriw~wl~s, Litto~na ~ittorea;~~ oyster drills; isopods; segmented worms. It should be noted here that there is no l~ropos~l to fill the ~ater~y -9- to create fast land. The only threatened or endangered species which might be found i.n this vicinity are terns. The owners indicate that they have not noticed any nesting there but they occasionally feed in nearby w~ters. No unique ecosystems~ critical habitats~ food sources or nesting locations are found here. Land use As stated in previous sections, the property has been used as a ship- yard as recently as several months ago. Bo~t sales and sex~ice, docking, storage~ hauling~ repairs~, etc. were typical activities. The Ga]!ey Ho Restaurant" operates out of one of the buildings nearest the marina. The New Suffolk Post Office operates out of leased quarters which it shares ~lth the o~n~rs. The Van Tuyl map of adjacent uses within 500' fo~uud in the appendices should be referred to for information on surrounding zoning. Specifically, north of the subject parcel is a fishing station which rents roWboats and sma~_l outboards. Further north on the ~terfront is another shipyard and private residences with docking spaces for ~all cc~mnerctal and pleasure boats. On the west side of First Street are residences~ most of which are year round. Directly opposite the pr~m~ses is a "light business" zone which includes a bar/restaurant and curio shop. South of those businesses is a mix of year round and seasonal residences. The most southerly parcel is owued by the Town of Southold and used as a public beach and parking area. A Town bo~t laun¢~ln~ ramp is located at the easterly end of J~ckson Street. Directly south of the subject parcel lies land belonging to the Southold Development Corp. ~ich al ~o own Robins Island. It contains a vacant dilapidated building and a fire damaged bulkheaded bo~t basin.. At time it ~s the site of an oyster processing plant ~hich ~s destroyed by fire. Later the open area ~s used as a parkLug area for shooting parties a~ other visitors being brought to Robins I~la~ by la~uch. The parcel not been used in recent years. The Town of So~thold Cc~prehensive Development PIA~, Part II (Ra~, May, Parish ann Pine, 1967) envisioned First Street frc~ K~ Street to Jackson Street as a "neighborhood shopping area'! with an additional 45,000 square feet of cc~mercial development with additional off-street parking facilities. That these changes have not developed may be due all or in pe~t to the ~11 stable year-round population an~ New Suffolk's "off the beaten track" location for the tourist trade. Else~ere in the report, the impor~ce of rehabilitating certain areas of the Town, especially the ~terfront, is stressed. ~ile this proposal differs in usage from the c~rcial usage ~hich ~s sho~, the Pla~ further states "It must be clear that a long r~nEe Development is not a permanent or unalterable document. It is based upon the best availshle information, judgement and forecasts of future events. But the u~olding of new develop- ment will in o~e ~y or another vary frc~ current expectations. It is for this reason that the Planning Boe~d must periodically review the Plan and all new proposals." The plan should be vie~=d as & dynamic rather tha~ static doc,,m-nt adaptable to new tnn~v~tive proposal* a~d not tied to prior usage ~hich may no longer be viable. An updated master plan is lr~esent~ being worked on but will not be available until an as yet undetermined date. T~e proposed project does represent a demographic change in the character of the area. This will be the first multiple dwelling project in the area and the cost per unit probab]~v wi]_l exceed the cost of neighboring oue family residences. It also constitutes a rehabilitation and upgrading of a deteriorating facility. Historical Resources Two historical facets of this 'site are of interest. The Ho~land Torpedo Boat Compe~y came to New Suffolk in 18~ when John P. Holland towed the hu]_l of his submarine from New Jersey to New Suffolk. The hull (USS Hollaud) was outfitted and tested here in New Suffolk between 1897 and 1900 when the U.S. Navy bought the Ho]la~ and ordered five "0" class submarines from the now Electric Boat Company. During the years 1901 to 1906 the Navy had its First Sub Base on the property a~8 tested the "O" class boats in the waters of Peconic Bay Just off New Suffolk. Both the Navy and Electric Boat Co. moved to Connecticut in the year 1906. The present Post Office is housed in the North Fork Shipyard and Marin~ Associates office building. · The present building was built in 1872 after the first building burned in that year. The Post Office was located in this building until 1898 when a Democrat replaced Jeremiah Tuthill as postmaster. He moved the Post Office two blocks ~p Nain Street. In 1900 the Post Office rsturned to the Goldsmith & Tuthill b~lding with Howard Tuthill as postmaster. It has remained in the same b~llding from 1900 to date. ~e property is not listed as ~ historical la~ark nor is it listed on the ~ational Register of Eistorical Locations. Vis~al Character series of recent photographs is included in the appendices. At present~ most of the buildiugs are vacant and in various stages of decay. The exceptions are the restaurant and shipyard offfice/iPost Office. While these have been maintained better than the rest~ some rehabilitation and repair are needed. The tallest buildings are about 45 ' and occupy several thousand square feet. Existing buildings ~re shown on the site plan by dashed lines. In addition to the buildings themselves~ numerous bo~t cradles are scattered about upon which boats rested during much of the year while the shipyard was operating. These features blocked most view~ of water frCm First Street. The waterfront view looking eastward frcm ~in Street is bracketed by the boatyard structures. While the proposed development will alter the p~noram~, of the bay~ it is the applicants' contention that this is alweady limited by existing structures. The Town-owned property at the southerly end of First Street offers the public a more panoramic view of the bay and opposite shorelines. With the removal of the equipment associated with the operation of the boatyard, it i~ anti~i~ that noise levels will decrease upon completion of the project. Usual construction noises will be limited to daylight hours only. No increase in odor level is foreseen. Existin~ environmental constraints affecting action The site is shown on Flood Insurance Rate ~p (FIRM) ~S60813-0094C for the Town of Southold. It lies within anA~zone which requires a first floor elevation of any proposed buildings to be +8' above mean sea level. This will be attained by trucking in approxfmately 7000 cu ysaxis of clean sand and loam. -1S- Setbacks of the proposed units from both FirsI~ Street and the un- bullheaded shoreline will be greater than existing buildings. Statement of Environmental effects The ten~porary disturbances to the site during construction ~ay deter its usage by sc~e species of wildlife. This effect is expected to be transitory, ho%~ver~ and cease up(m c~npletlon of the work. The long history of use as a shipyard and the activity associated therewith have limited the land's usage to species able to function in close proximity to man. Therefore, while usage of the property will chance with the construction of the cor~cminl~ns, the types of activities and structures will encourage usage by most if not all of the former wild- life residents and transients. No long term shift is seen. A temporary increase in noise aud dust (air particle) levels wilt be generated during the filling and construction stages of the project. These will cease upon completion of the structures and landscaping. In the short term~ employment for trades people will be provided. Increased p~tronage of some local businesses can be e~pected. · In co~paring present to auticipated traffic~ ib is necessary to inciudc all uses. As the shipyard has been phased out, traffic associated thercwibh has been substantially reduced. Presently only 2-3 employees maize approximately lO trips* per day. *A tri~ is defined by the Institute of Transportation Engineers as a single or one direction vehicle movmment with either the origin or destination (exitin~ or entering) ~n~i~la the study site." ~ri~ ends are the total of a~l trips leaving a designated s~lte over a given period of time o During peak operatio~ of the shipyard, a greater ~ber of employees and customers of the marina and ships' store generated significantly. greater volt,me. The restaurant is the largest traffic generator. The chart for a "quality restaurant" (turnover rate one h~Ar or longer) given in the Trip Generation (3rd Edition) book (1982), lists trips per 1000 sq. ft. The subject restaurant is approximately 1824 sQ. ft. thereby requiring a multiplication factor of 1.8 for the figures given. The average weekday trip rate during pea3~ hours is 18.6; Saturday~ 19.6; and Sunday, 16.7 trips per hour. The U.S. Post Office also contributes to traffic. The limited sample listed in "Trip Generation" indicates an average we~q~day trip rabe during peak hours of 11.36; Saturday 9.47. (Again, figures given are per 1000 sq. ~t. An unknown adjustment factor wI~1 affect this number). Summing present uses, (omitting shipyard tr~fflc) the approximate average trip rates are as follows: peak weekday 30; Saturday~ 29; Sunday, 16.7. By contrast a residential condc~lnium generates .51 trips per peak weekday hour per unit; .4~ Saturday tri~s; .&l Sunday trips. If ~ mul- tiply these by 24, the number of un~ts proposed, the totals are as follows: 12.2 weekday~ 10.6 Saturday; 9.8 Sunday. As these units will probab~ly be more heavily used on weekends than those considered in the "Trip Generation" book, the actual weekend figures may be somewhat higher. Nevertheless, traffic wt~ be s~bst&nt~ally less than present. Traffic generated by co~dc~f~ums is roughly ~a!f that generated by single family detached housing. This is due to the different type of usage, occupants, etc. Present roads ~11 be adequate to service the ccmmunity following -15- this project. As stated in an earlier section road runoff will be minimized by using porous materials if permitted by the Town. Any runoff ~hich would not percolate directSj ~hrough the road and parking surfaces w~l be handled by leaching basins which will overflow into the water~ during extr~v heavy rainstorms. The leaching basins will contain the "first flush" known to contain a large percentage of pollutants. All roof runoff w~11 be contained in dry wells leaching directly to ground water to eliminate the possibility of erosion. As the parcel is Quite flat, part~ally bulkheaded anM wfll be extensively laudscaped~ overla~ runoff to surface waters will be absent or negligible. The distance of the units fr~m the water and P~ltYof the soils also minimizes runoff. Grading of this parcel will not be permitted to effect drainage conditions of adjacent roadways or parcels. The effect upon gr~,udwater resources is discussed in the engineers' report. The type of system, pumpage and on-site recharge will not adversely effect surrounding facilities or cause increased salt water intrusion. Former water usage by the ahipyard for boat w~shdown, filling tanks, on-site toilets; by the restaurant; and by the post office roughly approximates that anticipated for the condcmfn~um. The water supply has remained stable and reliable for decades. A unique aspect of this cond~mtnium complex is the presence of the boat basin. It is l~kely that potential purchasers will be boat owners, probably of large sailboats an~ powerboats similar in size ~o those berthed there now. Usage of the basin by boats will have a minimal effect upon waterway. Marine heads on boats must ccmply with al ? applicable standards which prohibit any overboard discharge of untreated material. Little petroleum residue is created by inboa~ds, and, as no l~Aeling faci- lities are to be located here~ contamination by gasoline or diesel fuel ks not anticipated. Bottcm paints (anti-fouling) leach very little and will not have any degrading influence upon the ~terw~y. Closure of the shipyard will result in the loss of 3 Jobs. (During peak operation, the shipyard employed 11 part-tfm~ and permanent e~ployees) The restaurant w11~ leave the site but present plans are to re-open in a larger facility in nearby Mattituck. Thus there wl~l be no loss of Jobs. The Post Office will also be relocated nearby causing no loss of empl6yment. Cu~,lative impacts are usually the most difficult to predict. The role %h ich this development will play in the future of Southold Town in general and New Suffolk in particular depends upon many diverse factors such as availability and suitability of other sites, state of the econcmy~ etc. Few other locations can offer the same attractions. Its w~terfront location and sheltered boat basin will attract a boating-oriented clientele not likely to be interested in ireland sites. In the vicinity of New S~ffolk, this site is unique due to its sizej ~waterfront location and history of usage. The shipyard occupies a ~oulge in the shoreline not present to the north or so~th. The narrowness of nearby parcels greatly restricts their development potential. }hrther north, mingle family detached residences occupy many parcels. Several would have to be accu~,~ated and zone changes secured in order to create a similar development. -17. Other waterfront condc~inium developments~ have been approved or are pending approval within the Town of S~A~h old and Village of Greenpor% sc~e on the sites of former shlpyards~ or oyster processing p~mnts. Marinas, shipyards, etc. ~ small to moderate size have found it increas- ingly difficult to survive due to ever-more stringent environmental regulations~ high taxes, high cost of fuel and modern equilmment, and boatowners demands for an array of ~a~dbound attractions (sW~m~g pools, tennis courts~ playgrounds, restro~ms~ etc. ) which require considerable area to install. If these cannot be provided~ they will patronize other f~cilities ~ich can. Zu most instances, additional adjacent laud for e:~pansion is not available at reasonable cost. The q~andry in which the marina or shipyard owner finds himself is receiving ~ limited return on a valuable piece of real estate. Faced with this di~mma, many operations on Long Island and elsewhere, have chosen to convert their properties to multi-unit use. The trend will decrease the number of rental slips available to the general public at a time when d~aud remains high. The solution to this situation is at best difficult and at worst, insoluble. Cooperation ~noung aL1 levels of government to facilitate marina operations would be reQuired~ an unlikely prospect. The instant project is a part of the o~erall phenomenon. Its approval ~ denial ~ay effect the thinking of owners of other operations but the deciding factor to seek conversion will be the individ~al financial status of that particular operation. Fire and police protection will be provided by existing dcDartments. Telephone service can be brought in fr~n existing lines. Electrical service will be supplied by LILC0. The additional load~ -18- 210,192 kilowatts per year (based on an average annual usage of 8,?58 kw) (Nassau-S~ffolk Regional Planning Board, 1977) can be supplied by existing genel~ting i~cilities. The project site lies within the New Euffolk School District ~15, whose school pol~lation in K-6 in 1981-82 ss 23 (High school students attend 1.~ttituck-Cutchogue). This type of project is not expected to att~wact residents with school age children ~no w~l~ attend ~ocal schools. Therefore no impact is foreseen upon the school system. Identification of an~ adverse effects which ~a~not b~ avoided As the parcel is already developed and privately owned, there will be no si&mificant loss of open space or access to the ~ter for the general public. DesQr~ptio~ o£ mitlmation ~eas~Fss to minimize s~verse effecSs The planned adherence to regulatory restrictions on al~ levels will mitigate the impact of the project. E~then and rock berms are proposed which will follow the bul~head and shore line. In addition to the aesthetic appeal, they will minimize overland runoff into the waterway. Planting of suitable vegetation will also minimize runoff. The overa~ landscape p~a~ wi..l,1 include indigenous as well as orna- mental st~cies. Bayberry, rugosa rose, black pine~ red cedar are some of the trees and shrubs which would do well in this type environment and not require the high level of attention needed by many other species. By using these and similar species, fertilizer usage and ~tering can be decreased. The usage of brackish w~ter for the domestic w~ter supply is an important mitigation measure. Since this will not draw Rpon the existing freshwater aquifer, that resource will r-m~in available to those now. dependent upon it. The high degree of treatment of sewage ~ud reinJection on-site will not cause pollution of the adjacent waterway and w~11 prevent saltwater intrusion in !~ud. Preservation of the' Post Office has been identified as an~ importaat issue, t~e applicants have stated their willingness to relocate the structure to another location on the site if approvals can be secured frc~ all involved regulatory agencies. Thus~ this portion of New Suffolk history c~,!d Identification of a~¥ Irrevsrsible aad ~rre rievab!e c~p~ ~t~ents of ~esourc~ The usage of fossil fuels to power construction equipment and workers vehicles is irreversible as is the consumption of electrical power by tools. Description of anM mrowth-induc~n~ asp~qts of the acti(~,, The population of New Suffolk is c~bined with that oF Cutchogue in the population survey by LILC0 and by the U.S. Census. In 1970, the census fig~r~ was 2788. The LILCO estimate of 1/1/81 population is 2791. Thus the population has essentially remained static for a long period of time. ~Assuming 2.25 persons per condcminium unit the population will increase by 2%~. if the pol~lation of New SuffolS~ alone were known and used, the proportionate increase w~Ald surely be greater as Cutcho&~e contains more residents. As stated in an earlier section~ condc~inium residents are expected to patronize local businesses. Since the number of potential patrons at any one time is ~.~-~ ~, no significant changes in local businesses is antldipated. .Impact of the action on the u~e end conservation of ene~ During the construction phase, energy in the form of fossil fuels and electricity ~rill be consumed. Upon ccrapletion~ s ~trj~C_ ~t~s w1.12 be heated by modern, efficient equipment. All proposed sturctures will be adequately in~lated to minimize energy consumption. Existing sources o£ electrical energy supplied by LILCO are adqQuate to service the proposed facilities. Descript~on ar~ ev~l.,-t~on of reasonable alternatives to achieve the of s~milar obJective.~ Since a~ operations at the shipyard ~.11 soon ceasa, the "no action" alternative would leave the parcel vacant and abandoned. The wooden buildings are a likely target for vaadalism said serious fires coruld result. "No action" wo~ld also deny any retuau2 on the applicants' investment in the property. A ~ unit development was designed for the site within the density requirements of the "M-l" zone. Based on 6.7 units per acr% ~4.6 units are allowable under the requested zoning. It was felt that ~4 units could fit comfortably on the site without overtaxing any resources or being "overintense". ~, As~wuming single fs~mi!y detached housin~ at one unit per 40,000 sq. three (pe~-haps four as the necessary square footage is slightly lacking) units could be built. This type of development would not afford a reasonable return ~m~ess each lot were to sell for an unrealistically high price. The difficulties fa~ed by a ~ma~l commercial marina ~re discussed previously. Reopening the operation under different ownership is likely to encounter the sam~ obstacles and not be Successful. Action at a different site is not feasible as the applice~xt does not own any other developable parcels. Action at a different time would finaucially burden the applicant wibh carrying costs on a non-inccme producing property. Studies. reoort~ and. l~tc~at~re' uSEd in p~eparat~~ of DEIS Austin, G.L. Jr. 19~1. ~'~ter and marsh birds of the world. Golden Press, New York. Burt, W~ 1 ] im~ H. et al. A field guide to the mammals, 1964. Houghton ~ifflin Cc~pany, Boston. Chmura, G.L. and N.W. Ross. 1~78. The environmental impacts of m-~nas and their boats. University of i~hode Island Marine ~ore~d%~n Miner, R.W. 1~50. Field book of seashore life. G.P. l%Atnam's so~s, New York. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 1977. Tidal Wetlands Laud Use Regulations, Part 661. RaYmond and May. 1967. Development p/an for the Town of Southold. U.S. Department of A~riculture. 1975. Soil survey of Suffolk County. Riverhead. Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1983. Trip Generation. 3rd edition. Washington, D.C. Long Island Lighting Cc~pany, 1981. and Suffolk Counties. Current population estimates for 2~ssau DIST. SEC If2 BLOCK LOT BETWF,.E/t TIlE NOWlql FORK SHIPYARD, iNC., a domestic corporation of-~J~e State of New York, having its office and principal place of business at Ma/da: Street {no number), New Suffolk, New York party o£ the lirst part, and MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC., a domestic corporation of State of New York, having its office and principal place of business at Main. Street (no numbor), New Suffolk, New York party of thc sec,md part, ~/JITI~IF_,.~.~.TH, that the party of the first part, in consideration o~ ONE and no/lO0 ($1.00) ............................................ Nwful re.ney of tb~ Unhed by the party (ff thc .et'ond parl, docs hereby glatll and i'clcii~e UIIIO lin, party .f th(' hl.gOlld parh ~1_1. that cg~ain plot. pi~e ur parcel o~ lnnd. with the buildings and iml)rOvelnunls thereon erected, lying and ~ing ~ ~t New Suffolk, Town of Southold, Count] or Suffolk an~ New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of First Street at the southwest cal~_n of the premises herein described where the d/vision line between said premise~, a,~ the land.,now or formerly of the Rads1 Oyster Company adjoining on the south , intersects the said easterly side of First Street; running thence North 6 54 minutes 30 seconds East along the easterly side of First Street, 211.02 the corner formed by the intersection of the easterly side of First Street w/th th~: southerly side of Main Street; thence South 83 degrees 45 minutes East along southerly side of Main Street 193.50 feet to the southeast corner of said Ma/ga Street; thence ~orth § degrees 15 minutes East along the easterly end o~,'~ Street, 49.50 feet to the northeast corner of Main Street;thence North'8~" 45 minutes West alon~ the northerly side of Main Street, 192.94 feet to the' formed by the intersection of the northerly side of Main Street with the side of First Street; thence alor~ the easterly side of First Street, Nort~ 54 minutes 30 second~ East 272.45 feet to the land formerly of David thence South 83 'degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East along said last to Peconic Bay; thence in a general southerly direction along Peconic northerly line oflmnd of Radel Oyster Company; thence alon~ said 1,and Oyster Company~ North 83 degrees 05 minutes 03 seconds We~ to the side of First Street at the point or place of beginning. , :,, TOGETIiER with all the right, title and interest of the parties of the in and to several grants of land under water dixectly In front of these conveyed, BEING and intended to be the same premises conveyed to The North Fo~k~i~ Shipyard° Inc., the parties of the first part herein, by deed dated February 1978 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on February 24, Liber 9393 Of deeds at page 62. 11467 [;UFFOLK COUNTY ' ( GE'iHER with all of the right title and interes{ of th(, part of, in and to the waters and lands under the waters of Peconie Bay adjacent to the above described premises. , This conveyance was authorized by th'e Board of Director,~ of th~, party of tho first part, and approved by thevote of the holders of two-tifirds of all of its outstanding shares entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholdcr,q duly held on'.l'~t, 23th r{a¥ ,,C May. 1,081. '{'hi,q ~:onv,,,yanc~, is subject to a certain morl{~a{7(, *'×~'c.{,,d {~,v Th,, North i,'~,rk Nl{i{)yar~. Inc., as mortgagor to the AdministraJ,)t. ~{' Ih. :-)re;l{{ Ihis~n~ss Adminislra{.ion of thc, United States of America. as morti~a~,, which mortgage is dated ['cbt'usry 15, 1978 and was recorded on /vcbm~ary 24. 1978 in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office in Liber 8117 of mortgages at pa~e 132. and the party of the second part herein assumes and Covenants to pay ~uch mortgage debt and intorost as part of the consideration of the conv~,yancc. TOGETHER wilh lILy ; l,i~ IJ'ltql;llt~'t',, all(I all till' estale alld r[gllt5 of the party of the lir~t 1)art in and to TO HAVE AND TO HOLD thc premise:~ herein granted unto the party ~ff file second part, tile heirs or .~.ND the party of tile first part covenants that tile party of the first F, art has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been incumbered ill any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using ally part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WFTNF..~ WI'IF..RF..OF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. PRESENCE OF: THE NOItTII FOJtK SHIPYARDs, INC. Of ~ YORK. COUNTY On the day of 19 personally came , before me to me known to be the individual de.scribed in and who executed the 'roreR'nanff instrument, and acknowledged that executed ~e STAT! OIs NIW YORK, C~,UNTY OF ~q[J I? F()L K 'i ss.' On tbe~..5'ff~ day nf~Z'J~.~n~/.~ 19 81 before me personally came 'J.hMF~ A~ ICENNIFF: ' ' to me known, who, l~mk~5-y ~ du'~ sworn, 2id dePOse and say that lie resides at No. , · u'~o ~umoer; Youngs . Avenue, $outhold0 New that he is the Pre~qideHt of THE NORTH F©RK SHJ~YARD_ , the corporation-described in and which executed the foregx~ing instrument; that he knows the seal of ~id corporation; that the seal a~ixed to said instrument is snch corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the I~ard of directors of said corpora- tion, and that h~ sim~ed It~ name thereto by like order. /', c.,-- / . ST*TI Of NIW YORK, COUNTY On the day of l~rsonally came 19 before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the ~ne. STATI.OF,NIW YORK, COUNTY OF t ss: On the day of 19 , before me personally came. to me known, who, being I,y ,nc drily sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. ; that he is the of , the corporation deKrihed in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the hoard of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. Till E NO. TIlE NOT{Tll I,'( )1.¢1< ~-;llJl'",/\ I? I ), tN('. MAH, IN E '~SS() ( ' lA '1 ' l,.S,' IN(?, TIlE TITLE GI/ARANTEE COAIi'JNY Robert W. Tasker, Esq. 425 lgain Str~t Oroenport, Nc, w ¥o:-k 11944 Zip No, Iff/, ',Loc,,( : t~'., . B~4 TH~ ~0RTH FORK SRIPYARD, INC., a do~estic State of New York, having its office and principal place of bus~eaa ' Street (no number), New Suffolk, New York party of the first part, and MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC., a domestic corporation ~ State of New York, having its office and principal place of business Street (no numbe~), New Suffolk, New York party of the second l)art, ~'r]'N~H, titat the pariy of the first i~rt, itl consideration of ONE and no/100 ($1.00)--' ........................................ Inwiul ,nol~¢y of thc United States, by thc party of lite ae~ond part, does Itcreby grant and release unl0 thc i~mrty of lilt. st~oll,{ I~rl, 11~ succesmrs and assig~s of the party of the seco.d part forever, ~l_l. that cc~ain plot, pi~e or parcel of land, witfi th~ buildings and m~provelncni~ th~rcon lying ~nd ~ing ~. at New S~folk, Town of Sou~old, County of Suffolk ~d New York, bounded ~d described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the easterly aide si First Street at the of the premises herein described where the ~sion line between the land~lnow or formerly of the Radel Oyster Company adjo~ing on the intersects the said easterly side of First S~eet~ ruing thence 54 minutes 30 seconds East alo~ the easterly aide of First Street, ~e corner formed by the ~tersection of the easterly aide of First southerly side si Main StreetI thence Sou~ 83,degrees 45 minutes E~t southerly side of Main Street 193.50 feet to ~e sou~e~st ~reet; thence No~ 8 ~gre~ 1~ m~u~s East ~o~ ~ e~s~ ~eet. 49, 50 ieet to ~e ~t co~ ~ M~ St~eetl 45 minutes West ~o~ ~e notedly side of M~ 8treat, 192. B4 formed by the ~tersecti~ of ~e no~rly ~i~ st Ma~ Street ~ i ai~ of First Streetl the~ee ~o~ the eaa~=ly side of 54 m~utes 30 secon~ East 272.45 feet to ~ ~d formerly, ~ ~d thence South 83 'degrees ~ m~utea 3~ aeg~da E~st ~1o~ a~ ] to Peconic BayI thence In a general ao4therly ~recti~ northerly line of land ~ Ra~l 0~ster Comply; ~ence Oyster Comply. No=th 83 ~grees 06 m!~u~s ~ aero,da I side of First Street at the po~t or place st 'PiX]ETHER with all the right, title and interest of the parties of t in and to several grants of land under water d/~ectly in fl'ont of these c on vcyt.' d. BEING and intended to be the e&me p~'emises conveyed to The Shipyard, Inc., the parties of the first pa~t herein, by deed dated 1978 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerkts Office on February Liber 9393 of deeds at. page/{2. 11467 TOGETHEI~ with all of the right title and interesl of the part of, in and to the waters and lands under the waters of Peconic Bay adjacent to the above described premises. This conveyance was authorized by thb Board of Directors of th(, party of th(, first part. and approved by thevote of the holders of two-thirds of all of its outstanding shares entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholder,~ duly held on ~ht. 23th tiny ,,f May. 1981. Thi,q c~mw,.yanep is .~ub.ject to a certain mnrtl~age ~x~,~,lll~,H h.¥ 'l'h{' North I,'ork Hhil~.yard. [ne., as mortRagor to the Administr. al.v ~)r Ih, /;mall Ihls~ness Adminislration of the United States of America, as mort~a~e~,, whieh mortRage is dat-d bobrua~y 15, 1978 and was recorded on February 24, 1978 in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office in Llber 8117 of mortgages at page 132, and the party of the second part herein asSUmes and Covenants to pay such moetgage debt and interest as part of the consideration of the conveyance. I'll;IJJ~ ;tl~tJllmg lhv al.l~c dcscril.,d i,rcmi~e~ I,, the ('~ll[('t ]JlIt'S lll~reof, TOGETH~ witl, thc itpj~tlrlvll;~nce~ ;ul<l all lilt' estate alJd rights of Ihe party ~f lhe first part in and to smd premises, TO HAVE ~D TO HO~ Iht~ premi~e~ herein grmited tmto the t~y ~f the ~ec~md pa~, Ihe heirs or AND the party of Ihe first part covenants that the party <ff the first part ha~, not done or snffered anything whereby the said premises have heen incumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the paxty of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid. eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this iodemure so requires, IN ~ Vsq'IF..RF..OF~ the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. ' '~AT~ ~ mw YO~K. COUNTY of On the d~y of 19 persorra~ly c~me , before me to me known to he the individual dezcribed in and who executed the foregoinff instn~ment, and acknowledged that executed the uam~ ST&TI Oil NEW YORK. C~UNTY OF ~U [~'J~()L,K "~ ss: On th~.~ff~ (lay of ~~ 19 81, before me personally c~me ~J~-Ma~ A~ K.ENNIF~. : ' to me known, who, b~,h-g-'tFy-,fi~ d'uT~'y sworn, *did dePOse and say that he resides at No. (No Number) Yo~ngs . Avenue, Southold, New'Yox' that he is the President of THE NORTH F()RK SHIPYARD,. INC.. tT~ corporatton de,tribal in ~md wh ch executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is soch corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order .f the board of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he ~it~ned h/~, name thereto by like order. /, // / STATI OII NIEW YOLK. COUNTY On the du~y of persor~lly came 19 , be[ore me to me known to he tl~ individual descril~'d in and who executed the [oregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. STATI.OF,NEW YOLK. GOUNTY OF : ss: On the day of 19 , before me personally came to me known, who, being hy nw duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. ; that he is the of , the corporation deKrthed in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the sepal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. TITLE NO. THP] NOI{Tll H'()Hig ~gllit'YAI{,I), IN('. MAR1Nb] /\SS( ( ]~'I'H~,iN(:. TIlE TI?LE GI/ARAJWII,;I,'. Ct)All'ANY Robert W. Tasker. Esq. 425 Main SL ",~,eL Groenport, ltc, w Y'~:'k 11944 LOT k CONSULT YOUR i.~WYER elEFORE~If41NG THIS INSTRUMENT--THIS INSTRUMIENI~JO~JLD BE{t THE NOETH FOEK ~HIPY~ED,~[~C., ~ domestic co~po~tio~ State of New York. ha~ng its office and principal place of bus.ess at Street (no number). New Suffolk. New York party of the first paR. and MARINE ASSOCIATES. INC.. a domestic corporation State of New York. having its office and principal place of business at Main Street (no number). New Suffolk. New York I party of the second part, ~'ITNF_,~q~'TI-J, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ....~,.,.. ONE and no/lO0 ($1.00)-- .......................................... doBar~, lawful money of thc United States, pa/d. by thc parly of the second part, docs hereby gram and rck'asc unto flit par~y oi Hw sec~md l~r!, file helr~ or ~ succes~rs and ass{gns of the pa~y of the second pa~t forever, ~LL that ce~aln plot, p{~e or ~a~el of land, with sfie buildings and improvements thercou erected, ~it~, ~ lying and ~ing~ at New Suffolk. Town of Sou~old, County of Suffolk and New York. bounded ~d described as follow~: ~'~ BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of First Street at the southwest ca~ of the premises herein described where the division line between said premise//,,~ the land,!now or formerly of the Radel Oyster Company adjoining on the south intersects the said easterly side of First Street; running thence North 6 de 54 minutes 30 seconds East along the easterly side of First Street. 211.02 the corner formed by the intersection of the easterly side of First Street southerly side of Main Street; thence South 83 degrees 45 minutes East southerly side of Main Street 195.50 feet to the southeast corner of said Street; thence North 8 degrees 15 minutes East alor~ the easterly Street, 49.50 feet to the northeast corner of Main Street; thence 45 minutes West alon~ the northerly side of Main Street, 192.94 feet to the formed by the intersection of the northerly side of Main Street with the side of First Street; thence alor~ the easterly side of First Street, North 54 minutes 30 seconds East 272.45 feet to the land formerly, of David H~.[ thence South 83 degrees ~7 minutes 30 seconds East along said .last to Peconic Bay; thence in a general s°~therly direction along Peconic northerly line ofl~nd of Rads1 0~ster Company; thence along said Oyster Company~ NOrth 8~:degrees 05 minutes 03 seconds w~r t0 side of First Street at the point or place of be~inni~[. TOGETHER with all the right, title and interest of the parties of the f~t in and to several grants of land under water d_t_~ecGy in front o/these conveyed. BEING and intended to he the s~me premises conveyed to The North] Shipyard. Inc.. the parties of the first part herein, by deed dated 1978 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk*s Office on February 24. Liber 9393 of deeds at, page 62. SUFFOLK;:<(: L. dS06 TOGETHER with all of the right title and interest of the part of, in and to the waters and lands under the waters of Peconic Bay adjacent to the above described premises. This conveyance was authorized by th~ Board of Directors of th(, party of the first part, and appro,red by the,rote of the holders of two-thirds of ali of its outstanding shares entitled to 'rote at a meetir~ of stockholders duly held oh'S,hr, 2~th dny ~t'May, 1981. · This (~nnw,yancr, is .~ubject to a certain mortgaff(, ('xvc~it,,d hy Tho North {,'ork Ship.yard, Inc., as mortgagor to the Administrator o{' {:h~, Small l~ua~ness Administration of the United States of America, as mortgage,., which mortgage is dat-d February 15, 1978 and was recorded on February 24, 1978 in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office tn Llber~ 8117 of mortgages at page 132, and the party of the second part herein azsumes and covenants to pay such mortgage debt and interest as part of the consideration of the conveyance. a ~.ic.l ttP..3~, with all right, lille ' tntercM, i£ any, of the party of the fir~ in ~nd to ~Ly ~treeta a~d roads shutting tilt. a~vc descri~,d premises to the center lines thereof, T~TH~ with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of tbe pa~y of the first ~rt in and to ; said premises, TO ~VE ~D TO HO~ the pr~nise~ herein gr~lted unto the ~y of tile ~cond ~, the ~ir$ or ~ucces~r$ and assigns of the ~rty of the second pa~ forever. .a~ND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything' whereby the said premises have been incumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in complial~.e with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the P~i'ty o! the first part will receive the ¢on$ideratiO~ for this conveymaee and will hold the right to receive stroh eration as a trust fund to be applied first .{or the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will appl~ the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same {or any other purpose. The word "party" shall be ,construed aa if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indemure so requir~ ~N ~l'l'lqF.~ WHF~I~O~'~ the party of the fi~st part ha~ duly executed this deed the day and year first ahoy,* written. PRESENCE OF: THE NORTtI FORK SHIPYARD; INC. to me knoum to be the individual descr/bed in and who executed the 'foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. Onthe dayo~ STAre10P NIW YOLK, C~,UNTY OF SUFFOLK say that ~ r~ides at No. (No Number) Y~s . Avenue, S~thold~ New~o~ that ~ is the President of TH~ N~RTH ~OR~ S~YARD. I~C.. , t~ ~auonoe~n~o in and w~ch ex~ut~ the for~i~ in~rument; t~t ~ws the stol of said colorlon; t~t the ~ to ~id instinet i~ such co.rate s~l; that it afftx~ by order of the ~ard of di~rs of ~id floe, ~d that h~ ~i~e~ h~ name thereto by like ~IARY ~BLIC, S~a~ o~ He* ~ork No 5Y.39337~5, ~.fl~k ~Ufllv Tefra Expres March 30, TgR~ 19 as; , before me to me Imo~m to be the individual described in and who ex'~ed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that execut~ed the .amc. ffATtOF, NIW YORIL, COUNTY OP On the day of 19 , before me pe~onally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. ; that he is the o! , the corporation described in and which executed the {oregoing instrument; that he Imows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order o{ the board of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. ~llatllain nab ~pale ~eeb TIT[ E No. THE NOT{TTT lV()RK STIll YARD, INC. IO SECTION BLOCK LOT COUNIY OR IOWN MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. THE TITLE GUARA.N'TI£E COMPA.ArY Robert w. Taaker. Esq. 425 Main Str,,vt-~ Croenport. Now York 11944 Zip No. 'B _L DESIGNED .... DESCRIPTION REVISIONS :APPR'D. DRAWN CHECKED JOHN P. MAHONEY, P.E CONSULi"ING EN ,GINEER JULY ~vi A.i N 'fo SCALE' MA~::~ ~NE. ASSOCIAT~.'S rIMC. NOT6D C, /-.T , 4" ¢'~' t~A'~ L- o.00' L,__. u '6 ,,3