Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-117.-5-29.1 .N/O/F MICHAEL J. , 87'55' ~ .~~.~ ~ ~, t '~ 40.00'o.~' ~~Z?<] .~ ~,~ ~',~ ~~ ~-, z~~ I~ I / 'I ~xx., , .~ -~~¢.. , LII· ·' ~ . 1~" ' ; ~.. ~ ',i 5 , .~ ~ ~ PARKING CALCULATORS . . . .~ 4. -~ ~ ~ ~ ~R~NA L., t - '-" X 58.SLIPS = = 58 SPACES I . %. .. , ..~ ) ~- _ ~: ~', .-,, ~- ~ ~ RETAILS, LES =Z 'l ~~~~7~1l ~_ ~11 ' .'.,, .~'', C ,/' ~ ~, ,~, ':~ STORAGE RACK t'B" = 5 ~. 3 TI[R = /5 BOA T~I , ~. ,- u '..i~'-. . ~. ~ ' .. ' ~ ~ ' = ~ ' ALONG EXISTING ~~ ~ o.~ , ~ 82"~,--~- " ' ~ ~. T£$T HOLE 12/Ig105 N. ORCHARD STREET BUILDINGS ~ CONCRETE PA VEMENT=I62~O sq. ft. 16260 ~O. IT~ I = 2'76~cu. ft. BLUESTONE AREA '-= ~/~ 700sq. f/. 4/700~0./7~'0.6= ~253cu.7t. ~0/7 cu. ft. :' .Q ' 7017 cu. ft./68.4 = 102 VF. AREA= 2287 Acres to tie line's ~ROV, DE ZONING DISTRICTS-MI &M~ ' ~.,~,~,~., . II~V ~ ~ = FLOOD LIGHT .- . ' ,~,e,~,~,,,~]~%~'~, . . V ~ I, ~F · = AREA LIGHT LOT COVERAGE ~~~- ~,'~,A~~, ,~ ' UC . ',. . ,, ~ROPOS[~ONSrR nON A T NEW S FOLK ' . =/3~ I ~VVIV~I~ 0~1 SUFFOL COUNT "''" " ~O~:~eappm~d~elo~l~~ ~og~p,w~TER~ '' . '8~ ~RAVEL COLLAR D~NER/APPLICANT, . 8~(~~~oo ~. fl. '"~'/'~ TYPICAL LEACHING ~7ZO NE~ SUFFOLK ROAD INSTALL LO~ER THAN EXISTING GRADE NE~ SUFFOLK, N.Y. : II ~, I BUILD UP DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TO DIVERT RUNOFF F6 ~, ~OOE .ANY ~TERA~N' ~ AD~TION TO THIS ~RVEY IS A VIOLATIQN 8 ~ (PARXIN~) ' 'OF ~CTION 7~09 OF THE N~ ~0~ STATE E~CATION LAW. ' a ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ' ' ~ // ~ EX,PT AS P~ SECTION 7~09 ~BDIVISION ;. ALL CERTIFICATIONS ~J~ . ~ ~. ~&2003 ~ " / / // /h~-- HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP A~ C PHS TH OF Y 11 MX~. ~t ~oo~,,,o, ~ I /.~ ///Y/~ M Y R I1~ M~ 4.qRIR ' 0 ERE ONL IF tl ~l .... ~ t¢~ t~ t ~ . . , ,~,~_ . , ~ ,~_ ,. _ , $~ MAP. OR COPIES B~R THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR ~)~ ~=~ - ~ ~ ~~o~ ~?~ . ~////~ W~ SI~A~JRE~PP~RS ~EO~ · 1 ~ J No~.:~ ~bOa'~) ~.,,~ ~, ,~ ,~OOITIO~,~LLY TO'CO~LY WITH $~ LAW THE T~M'ALTERED BY' ~ ~ ' ' [~'~ 765 - 50~0 ~Y ~ ~.sH 765 - 1797 I ~ST USED BY ANY AND ALL SURVEYORS U~[~IZlNG A C~PY - ' -~ " ' P.O. BOX' 909 ' ''A~TH~' ~Y~O~S ~P. T~SSUCHAS INSPECT~ AND ' ' E, AE ~/ ~ ' ' ' ' " . ~USHT~'TO-DA~' A~ ~T'W C~L~N~ WITH'THE LAW. ~D ~ d ' ~ . ' I630 T~ V~ER S~ET I .--', '.. -.,., . . ....- . - ~ - ! . ~ - ,,,_ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 February 10, 2004 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for New Suffolk Shipyard Boat Racks Located approximately 300' north of Orchard Street, on the east side of New Suffolk Road, in New Suffolk SCTM#1000-117-5-29.1 Zone: MI & Mil, Marine Districts Dear Ms. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, February 9, 2004: The final public hearing was closed. WHEREAS, the proposed site plan, to be known as New Suffolk Shipyard Boat Racks, is for two boat storage racks as follows: Rack A equals 14' x 76' and Rack B equals 14' x 50' and stores a total of 36 boats on a 2.287 acre parcel in the MI, Mil Zones; and WHEREAS, New Suffolk Properties, LLC is the owner of the property known and designated as New Suffolk Shipyard, located approximately 300' north of Orchard Street, on the east side of New Suffolk Road, in New Suffolk. SCTM#1000-117-5-29.1; and WHEREAS, on September 9, 2003, a formal application for approval of this site plan was submitted; and WHEREAS, on March 25, 2003, the Southold Town Trustees approved the proposed construction; and WHEREAS, on March 31, 2003, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation approved the proposed construction and issued a Permit #1-4738-00941/00007; and WHEREAS, on June 19, 2004, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals approved the proposed construction under Appeal #5149; and WHEREAS, on September 23, 2003, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the site plan and issued comments on changes and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval; and New Suffolk Shipyard ( Boat Racks) - Paqe Two - 2/10/0d WHEREAS, on September 23, 2003, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed the site plan and indicated there are no architectural characteristics that bear comment and the Planning Board has accepted the recommendation; and WHEREAS, on October 3, 2003, the Cutchogue Fire District indicated no fire well is needed and the Planning Board has accepted the recommendation; and WHEREAS, on December 9, 2003, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (6 NYCRR), Part 617.5, made a determination that the proposed action is a Type II and not subject to review; and WHEREAS, on December 29, 2004, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed and certified the site plan; and WHEREAS, on February 6, 2004, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed and approved the site plan and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold h~e been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the site plan prepared by Peconic Surveyors, PC and certified by John T. Metzger, Land Surveyor, dated December 13, 1999 and last revised February 2, 2004, subject to fulfillment of the following condition, and authorize the Chairperson to endorse the final site plans with the following condition and subject to a one year review from the date of the building permit: 1) All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not wsible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. The lighting must meet the Town Code requirements. Enclosed please find two copies of the approved site plan, one for your records, and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for your Building Permit. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, house Chairperson Encl. L SITE PLAN STATUS REPORT SITE PLAN TYPE: AMEN~V~, WITHDRAWN '~COMPLETE _PROJECT NAME: ~],~, ..~,ntZ~¢.J/ .2/, ,//,/~c~-~&d~ ¥o~E1: ,~ ZONE2:,~_Zr' zo~3: LOCATION: /, ~)_r ,K/~ ~b.'?~[o ]K If,4~a~ /'"~".~:/'%-,.o SCTM#1000- //9 . ~ - l..OwNERNAME: .,q.,~ ~'~,-C-¢-~,,~ ~',,~.~ LZ( TEL#( )_ [APPLICANTNAM~:. ?,~ ~N'o,,c ~' - ' TEL# ( ) [THIS SITE PLAN IS FOR.2 ,~' / ('/ /~ r-'l/ - ' ............ ~'~'~( ~ ~O~). P~-SUB~SSION ~N ~ST DATE P~-SUB~SSION CONVINCE ~ 30 DAYS OF ~EN~ ~UEST FOR ~SIONS: P~-WO~ SESSION: - --' - ~0 · FEE AMO - ~ ~CE~.$ ~~ 10 D~S OF ~CEIPT) R NCOORDINATED: ~ . . RECEIVED/REVIEW: [;)RAINAGE PLAN: LANDSCAPE PLAN: LIGHTING PLAN: REFERRED FOR APPROVALS: 7ONING BOARD OF APPEALS: APPEAL#: BOARD OF TRUSTEE'S: BUILDING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: < TOWN ENGINEER APPROVAL: ARCHITECTURAL ,~EVIEW COMMITTEE: :)EF%OF TRANSPORTATION: DOT__, DPW__, SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH: SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING: FIRE COMMISSIONERS: ~ BOARD APPROVALS PREPARED: ~MENT OF SITE PLAN: / FINAL SITE PLAN INSPECTION: / DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT / / TOWN ENG__/ / ?~[.A.~NING BOARD 1VIEMBE4~ BENNETT O i:[LOWSKI, Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATI4AM, RICtL&RD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR CONSIDEP~TION OF A SITE PLAN Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, New York 11971 Fmx (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Date Received Date Completed Filing Fee New Change of Use Re-use Extension X Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: SCTM#: Location: Address: New Suffolk Shipyard 1000- 117-05-29.1 New Suffolk Road New Suffolk FEB 1 0 20u . South01d Town Plannin~ Board Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: Telephone: Owner of Land: New Suffolk Shipyard by Michael Irving, Manager P.O.Box 276 New Suffolk NY 11956 734-6311 New Suffolk Properties~ LLC Patricia C. Moore Esq. Agent or Person responsible for application: Address: 51020 Main Road~ Southold Telephone: Site plans prepared by: 765-4330 fax 765-4643 Peconic Surveyors 49618 765-5020 License No. Address: Telephone: Site Plan Applications Public Hearings Under the current site plan application procedure, the process for reviewing a site plan application is: a public hearing is not scheduled and held by the Planning Board until after, among other things, the site plan has received a stamped Health Department approval. The applicant shall now have the following options: To follow the established procedure, or To have the Planning Board schedule and hold a public hearing on the site plan application and have the Planning Board vote on the proposed conditional site plan prior to the applicant receiving Health Departm, ent approval subject to the following conditions: The applicant hereby agrees and understands that if the site plan which receives stamped-Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change is material to any of the issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold a public hearing on this "revised" site plan application and review its conditional approval. The applicant agrees not to object to a new public hearing and Planning Board review of the revised application. Applicant Agreement on Site Plans. The applicant is aware of the terms of this approval and certifies to these terms by his/her signature below. ' /~pplicant ~ Date Page ~ Planning Board Site Plan Application APPUCAN1~ AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNIY OF SUFFOU( /,',( being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above property, or that he is the of the (Title) (Specify whether Pa~ne~shlp or Corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed In any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be Installed In strict accordance with the plans submitted. ~ Signed Signed (Partner Or Corporate Officer a~l~l'~le) Sworn to me this t/ day,of. g p/ ~Ota~ Public)/ PATRICIA C. MOORE Notary Public, State of Ne~v York Suffolk County - No. 4861668 Commission Ex~lre~ June 16, ~ Paoe 5 PlannlnO Board SEe Plan Application 2.287 Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) MII Zoning District Existing Use of Site Boat Yard & Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building -- --will have which use. if more than one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. temporary boat storage racks alon~ exist{ng Boat Re_p_air buildin~ and along North property line 10,000 sq ~rtosS Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) 1,800 sq.OF/c~s Floor Area of Proposed Structure(si open structure (racks) 11% Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) 2% Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by 5149 Board of Appeals- Case # & date June 2002 filed Board of Trustees - Case # & date 2/03 NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date NO Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision _Expiration Date Other Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk Counb/Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of issuing agency Number and date of permit issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. V/OUqTORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION. ~ .......................... 50' .................... ~d i lvlinuteman Boat. Handling Equipment Inc. Plymouth, MA ~'~: ~.O/'~.I/Oa t--..--v 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurabIe. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analYSis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to b~ considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the portions of EAF completed for thls project: r~Part1 F'~ Part 2 r~Part 3 upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* E~C. result in or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the The project may one environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether[he action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Pads A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to comptete Parts 2 and 3. it is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation, if information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) Name of Applicant/Sponsor Address Business Telephone ~[~ State ~ Zip Code //' ~,.~ Name of Owner (if different) Address City/PO Business Telephone State Zip Code Description of Action: Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban ~ Industria, [] Commercial [] Forest ~'l Agriculture [] Other N.A. if not applicable ]Residential (suburban) r~ Rural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: ~,-~O--acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non*agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, crop(and, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION C) acres ~) acres O acres O acres C) acres ~) acres O acres O acres ~o O(-acresTOd ~ ~ actives What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: []Well drained [OO% of site rI'~Poorly drained __% of site E] Moderately well drained __ % of site. [f any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [] Yes [] No a. What is depth to bedrock NI/~ (in feet) % contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Re~isters of No E]Yes ~]No 8. 9. 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ~]No 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: r~0-10% I00 % ["~10_ 15% __% ~ 15% or greater__ 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or Historic Places? [] Yes [] Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? What is the depth of the water table?(~'4~V"~ (in feet) Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? r~Yes r~ No E~] Yes Page 3 of 21 plant or animal life that is t ed as threatened or endangered7 Does project site contain any According to: identify each species: &~o N~:~ I 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? J~Yes ~No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? BYes ~g'No If yes, explain: 1 4. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? r~Yes .j~No 1 5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. ~s the site served by existing public utilities? ~ Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? []Yes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? E]No ~]Yes []No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? F"]Yes 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 E~Yes [~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. 1. Project Description Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). E]Yes ~]No a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: ~-~'/'~acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: ~,'~;~ acres initially; ~-..-~'~ acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: ~ ~> acres. d. Length of project, in miles: /~/~ (if appropriate} e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing t/¢ ~; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: ~d'/ ~ One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? Will disturbed areas be reclaimed DYes []No [~N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Condominium width; length. ft. tons/cubic yards. b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpifed for reclamation? []Yes [] No How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? C) acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 '~ []Yes r~No 6. or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: _ If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated __ (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month c. Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Will blasting occur during construction? F'"] Yes [] No Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ months, (including demolition) year, (including demolition) __ year. r~Yes ~""] No 9. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11 · Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [] Yes ; after project is complete r~No If yes, explain: 12.1s surface liquid waste disposal involved? ,lYes ~lNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? F'~ Yes r~ No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? r~Yes ~-]No ~0 ~l~¢- If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [] Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes [~ No F~No if yes, what is the amount per month?__tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? E~Yes [~No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? L_.JYes lLaNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? __ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? []Yes [~]No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? r"~Yes ~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [] Yes ~No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? r-"'l Yes [] No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity O gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day -/' gallons/day. ~l.f~ ~) ¢~l,'~ 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [] Yes r'~ No if yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25, Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board [~Yes r~ No City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Y~s F~ No City, Town Zoning Board City, County Health Department r~ Yes F~ No Other Local Agencies r~Yes [] No Other Regional Agencies r~Yes [] No State Agencies [] Yes [] No Federal Agencies [] Yes ~ No C. Zoning and Planning ]nformatlon 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~-'~Yes r~ No if Yes, indicate decision required: r~ zoning amendment [] Zoning variance [] New/revision of master plan ~ Site plan [] Special use permit [] Resource management plan ]Subdivision ]Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification{s) 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [] Yes [] No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~ mile radius of proposed action? 8. ~s the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a ~A mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? r~lYes [] No Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? FI Yes [] No 11. Wil~ the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? F~I Yes [] No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. F]Yes [] No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ~ate Il- 17- 03 Tit]e If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastar Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation ie Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider ~ong term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column I or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3~ If a potentially large impact checked in co!umn 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Par[ 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large · Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. [] [] []Yes IZ]No Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. Page 11of21 Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] E~]¥es F=~No [] [] r~Yes F'~No [] [] ~es ~o Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) ©No FI~ES Specific land forms: Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) []No []~ES Examples that would apply to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: [] [] O~es ONe [] [] OYes 0"o [] [] O~es 0"o [] [] O~es El.o Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: [] [] OYes ONe [] [] OYes [].o [] [] EO~es Page 12 of 21 Will Proposed Action affect surCace or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO r~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from well~ with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural Conditions, Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] F~ [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change [~Yes j~No OYes r~No ~Yes ~No E]~ea E].o ~Yes ~No ~Yes ~No E~Yes ONo E%s rq.e OYes [] No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other impacts: IMPACT ON AlE Will Proposed Action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour, Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: I [] []Yes [].o [] FIYes Fl.o [] []Yes E]No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? IZ]No Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. [] []Yes IZ]No Page 14 of 21 Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. C)tl~er impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can ~mpact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. Other impacts: IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? Examples that would apply to column 2 The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, iF located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 ef 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsur/ace drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes Other impacts: [] [] F1Yes IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (if necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) ONe OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: [] [] OYes E']No O [] OYes ONe IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. [] [] OYes Page 16 of 21 Other impacts: I 2 Smallto Potential Moderate Large Impact Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change []Yes E~No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACEAND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational oppodunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: I r~No ~No ~No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: [] Fi Ehes [] I'q r-l~es [] F'I []~es E;]No [] [] [Z]~os [] [] [~Yes E~No Page 17 of 21 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transporta on systems? [] No [] YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ]NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase Jn the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Qther impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? [~NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. ]Yes []No [~No []No E]Yes []No ~]res ~]No Odors will occur roufinely (more than one hour per day). Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. [] [] ] [] Yes [] OYes Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: I Page 18 of 21 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of acc[dent or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: [] IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? I--INo I--lyES ' Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the [] project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The ~nunicipal budget for capital expenditures or operating [] servmes wJ]l increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. [] [] Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community, Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) [~Yes ~No J'-'JYes [~No []Yes ["'~Yes [~No [~Yes J~]No E~Yes E~]No E]Yes [~No [~]Yes ~No Page 19 of 21 Proposed Action will set an impor[ant precedent for future projects. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact impact Project Change Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Othe'r impacts: 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential [] [] [] es adverse environment impacts? If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 ~ Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 09/11/03 Transaction(s): Application Fees Check#: 4313 Receipt#: Total Paid: 0 Subtotal $774.3O $774.30 Name: Clerk ID: New, Suffolk Shipyard Pob 276 New Suffolk Road New Suffolk, NY 11956 JOYCEW Internal iD: 81937 PATRICIA C. MOORE ARorncy at Law $1020 Main Road Sot]ti]old, New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 February 5, 2004 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Hearing: Proposed Site Plan for New Suffolk Shipyard Boat Racks Located at 5575 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117.00-05.00-029.001 Mon., February 9, 2004 at 6:05 pm Dear Ladies/Gentlemen: Enclosed please referenced matter. eisel 227 Pa~ Avenue Hoboken, NJ 07030 · Complete items 1, 2, item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Michael Raynor 160 Inlet View East Mattituck, NY 11952 find two D. la dll~ae/addmee dllfemat from Item 17 Return Receipt cards for the above A. Signature X <, y ( P~ted Name) D. Is deliver~ fifferent from item 1 ? If YES, enter delivery address below: [] Agent [] Addressee truly yours, cia C. Moore FEB - 9 2004 S0uth0td Town Planning g0ara 3. Service Type ~ Certified Mail [-[ Express Mail r~ [~fl~rn Receiot for Merchandise PATRICIA C. MOORE A~orney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 February 4, 2004 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for New Suffolk Shipyard Boat Racks Located at 5575 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, NY SCTM ~1000-117.00-05.00-029.001 Hearing: Mon., February 9, 2004 at 6:05 pm Dear Ladies/Gentlemen: Enclosed please find the Affidavit of Posting, Mailing with twelve Certified Mail Receipts, and Receipt cards for the above referenced matter. Affidavit of three Return Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore PCM/mr Encls. FEB - 5 2094 /~.~ Seuthold Town Planning Boar~ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING_ This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as 5775 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, New York "hsC'ree';'; 'be easily seen, and that I have checked to be line facing the sure the poster has remained in place for sev 'the date of the I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on January ~.~O~ 2004 Your Name (print) L~ ~ FEB - 5 2004 Sign~{ture ~ p~n~ ~g ~oar~ Address Date Notary Public PATRIClA C. MOORE Ne*aW Publi~,, State of New Yo~ Suffolk CeunW - No. 4861668 ~--~ Commission Expires June 16, i~ C~ ¢./~ PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 no__~on, Fri., 2/6/04 Re: Proposed Site Plan for New Suffolk Shipyard Boat Racks SCTM#s: 1000-117-5-29.1 Date of Hearing: Monday, February 9, 2004, 6:05 p.m. PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tek (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Melissa McGowan Secretaries January 29, 2004 BY CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED NEIGHBORS Re: Proposed Site Plan for New Suffolk Shipyard Boat Racks Located at 5575 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, New York SCTM~ 1000-117.00-05.00-029.001 Dear Neighbor: I represent New Suffolk Shipyard with regard to their property located at 5775 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, New York. An application has been submitted to the Southold Town Planning Board for a site plan approval. The final public hearing regarding the maps for the above-referenced site plan has been scheduled for Monday, February 9, 2004 at 6:05 pm. Enclosed is the Notice to Adjacent Property Owners. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact V e~r~y~u 1 y yours, ~ricia C. Moore PCM/mm Enclosure Southold Town Plannin.q Board Notice to Adiacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#sl000-117-5-29.1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the R-40 Zoning District; That the application is for two boat storage racks as follows: Rack A equals 14' x 76' and Rack B equals 14' x 50' and stores a total of 36 boats on a 2.287 acre parcel in the MI, Mil Zone(s). The property is located approximately 300' north of Orchard St., on the east side of New Suffolk Rd., in New Suffolk; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, February 9, 2004 at 6:05 p.m. in the Meetin.q Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the C.;;'.,;;. T~mc.., published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. TP--Ff V EL_ E-.P~- ~/~7'C-~ 1¢~/~ Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): New Suffolk Properties, LLC/New Suffolk Shipyard Date: 1/16~04 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as 5775 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, New York by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on Februar_.y._.9_t__9 2004 Date NotarY Publi~ MARGARET C. RUTKOW$~ Notary Public, State of N~v YO~ No. 498252~ Qualified in ~flofk Coul~ ~~~, -~'/ PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon, Fri., 2~6~04 Re: Proposed Site Plan for New Suffolk Shipyard Boat Racks SCTM#s: 1000-117-5-29.1 Date of Hearing: Monday, February 9, 2004, 6:05 p.m. NS Shipyard Gluek Nora Tuthill & Lawrence' Tuthill orPOeoxNo. 5 Timber Lane Fairport,'NY 14450 O' ["'] =1 ;I I I ;I I =1 ~] ~T~ r;~ I J~J ;t =[el =1 I',,j Postmark ~r Certified Fee ' Return Reclept Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivew Fee (Endorsement Required} Tota, Roe,age&Feee Shipyard SontTo Michael Raynor -.¢FE~F~:-f~b::, ............................ ~ ............................... [o~OSoxNo. 160 Inlet _V~_tew East '~' ~'°'%ztP+4Mattit~ ~IY 11952 :ard m Fudjinski ' r~_ '-~f~e~'~pt. No,; orPO~oxNo, 564 First Street C~ty, State, ZIP+4 Brookl NY 11215 Michael J. Withers [ Celia Withers P.O. Box 654 New Suffolk, NY 11956 3. Service Type [] Certified Mail [] Registered [] I~sured Mail ~ony C Meisel ~ddress~ ~': 227 Park Avenue ~m~Hoboken, NJ 07030 ........ [~ INS Sh{p~ard ~tN~.: P.O. Box 597 ~ ................................................................. Cutchogue, NY 11935 [] Express Mail ~ rqReturnReceiptf°rUerchandise Inns Collins an'd ~..S e, [] C.O.D. . ................................... ~--' ...... '-~-'-'--~-'*--'*~' ...... t. No.; · ' 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 7003 2260 0002 4870 2773 PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt DYes _~No. P.O. Box 134 - % ZIP+4 New Suffolk, NY 11956 : Ekster ................ -- ' ~tT~b:~ .................................. Mary Ekster P.O. Box 64 New Suffolk, NY / 11956 [] Oerb'fled M~ [] Insured Mall rl Re~um Receipt for Merchandise [] C.O.D. 2. Article Number ,xNo P.O. Box 64 e, ZIP+4 New Suffolk, NY 11956 .......... i,~ · t~j I NS Shi~Tard ,ael J. Withers a~d Celia Withers $t7 ~E.f .................................................................. ~No. P.O. Box 654 ~.~,.t..~,.~ 70B3 226~ 0002 4870 2827 New Suffol.__k, NY 11956 ' I ~.~ NS .~ipya~ Thomas Christianson and~ ~~ ~ence Tuthill ............... [[ ] ............ P.O. Box 65 Greenport~ ~Y 119~ ~ew Suffolk~ SY 11956 ~ Registered ~ Return R~eipt for Merchandise Postage a Fees I $ I ~S 4. Restricted Deliver? (~m Fee) ~ Yes ~de~[c ~. ~ndeman~ & ~a[so~-O Postage , $ N~S" Shi New Suffolk, i~m ["$~nt 'to , 'ard JRoberta Cropsey_ ' J ~fr~g ~y ~,: .................................. U7---777~ ....................... / [~rPOBoxNo. 376 Sanborn RoaJ j DT~; ~i~i~ ~f~¥ .................................................................... PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Via Hand Delivered February 6, 2004 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Proposed Site Plan for New Suffolk Shipyard Boat Racks located at 5575 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117.00-05.00-029.001 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: Enclosed is a letter I received by facsimile yesterday supporting the above referenced matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very t~li-{F' yours, Patri'cia C. Heere PCM/mm Enclosure Sou'toU To~'~ n Planning Board To: TOTAL P.O1 PATRICI~JJc. MOORE, ATTORNEY Alii[AW 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-4330 SUSdECT ,' ~ /~j South?d TOW. Via Hand Delivered PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 February 6, 2004 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Proposed Site Plan for New Suffolk Shipyard Boat Racks located at 5575 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117.00-05.00-029.001 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: Enclosed is a letter I received by facsimile yesterday supporting the above referenced matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me, PCM/mm Enclosure {.. Patricia C. Moore Sou~hold Town Pla~min~ Boar'~ Co., lDc TO JOSHUA Y. HORTON SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (516)-765-1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel (516)-765-1560 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 February 6, 2004 Re: New Suffolk Shipyard Site Plan SCTM #: 1000-117-05-29.1 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the revised site plan for the above referenced project. The Site Plan has a revision date of February 2, 2004 and was prepared by Mr. John Metzger from Peconic Surveyors. The revisions to this Site Plan have addressed all of the concerns listed in my 9/23/03 report in a satisfactory manner. This revised Site Plan meets the minimum requirements of the Town Code. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact my office. CC; / ,James A. Richter, R.A. Peter Harris / J (Superintendent of Highways),~,~' Iouthold PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODttOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 9th day of February, 2004 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed lot line change for Salvatore Petrolino and Richard & Cynthia Hilary. The parcels are located 1,375' e/o North Bayview Road and Cedar Avenue in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New YORK. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-78-8-16.4 & 17.2 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for New Suffolk Shipyard. ~'he property is located approximately 300' north of Orchard Street, on the east side of New Suffolk Road, in New Suffolk, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-117-5-29.1 Dated: 1/21/04 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 29, 2004 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Traveler/Watchman P.O. Box 1179 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 To: Traveler/Watchman From: Valerie Scopaz/Carol F.x: 765-1756 Pages: 2 Phone:. 765-3425 Date: 1/21/04 Re: Legal Ad for 1/29/04 Edition cc: Please print the following legal ad in the 1/29/04 edition. Thanks. 2/9/04 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Petrolino/Hilary Lot Line Change 6:05 p.m. New Suffolk Shipyard Site Plan Kindly acknowledge receipt by signing below. Received by: Date: I°~qNING BOARD MEMB~S JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR · P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 9th day of February, 2004 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed lot line change for Salvatore Petrolino and Richard & Cynthia Hilary. The parcels are located 1,375' e/o North Bayview Road and Cedar Avenue in Southold, Town of Southold,,. county of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-78-8..~16.4 & 17.2 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for New Suffolk Shipyard. The property is located approximately 300' north of Orchard Street, on the east side of New Suffolk Road, in New Suffolk, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-117-5-29.1 Dated: 1/21/04 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 21st day of January, 2004 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town HaUT 53095 Main RoadT Southold~ New York 2/9/04 Reoular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed lot line change for Salvatore Petrolino and Richard & Cynthia Hilary SCTM#1000-78-8.16.4 & 17.2 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for New Suffolk Shipyard SCTM#1000-117-5-29.1 Sworn to before me this Notary Public L_.._ (~-z'-e w_L./' ) c7~.c_.,.,..2 Carol Kalin Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board ,2004. BARBARA ANN RUDDER Not~r'f Public,~ ef New York No. C Qualified i~I Suffolk Coun~ ommllli0n Ex~re~ ~1 t4~ No--ring NOTICE IS HEREBY G!I/ N, that, pursuant s~0n 276of the Town to Law ifor the~ ~ for Avenu~ To~ of Sunthold, State of is located north o on the east side of New Suffolk Road, Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000- 117-5-29.1 Dated: 1/2i/04 BY ORDER OF THE SUTHOLD TOWN PLAN- NING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson 1X 1/29/0~ (201) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ss: Lise Marinace, being duly sworn, says that she is the Legal Advertising Coordinator, of the Traveler ~Vatchman, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Traveler Watchman once each week for ..... ./. ..... week(~) ~ successively, corn~m~ncing on the ..... ~.~.. ...... day of . · ~ '¢5/~ 14~ ,,/~c~ .,~ ./.~/ ........ ,200~. ~rn to before me thi .s~..~...day of (C'..~/.1,X~..,..~...., 2004. NotaD Public Emily Itamill NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No. 0 [ HA5059984 Qualified in Suffolk COIlllty Commission expires May 06, 2006 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765h3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Januaw 13,2004 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for New Suffolk Shipyard Boat Racks Located at approximately 300' north of Orchard Street, on the east side of New Suffolk Road, in New Suffolk SCTM#1000-117-5-29.1 Zone: MI & Mil, Marine Districts Dear Ms. Moore: The following re~olution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held oh Monday, January 12, 2004: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, February 9, 2004, at 6:05 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall for the final public hearing regarding the maps for the above-referenced site plan. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Hall. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, February 6th. The si~ln and the post need to be retu~'ned to the Plannin,! Board Office after the public hearin,q. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Chairperson Encl. ,Southold Town Plannin.q Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owner~ You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#s1000-117-5-29.1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the R-40 Zoning District; That the application is for two boat storage racks as follows: Rack A equals 14' x 76' and Rack B equals 14'x 50' and stores a total of 36 boats on a 2.287 acre parcel in the MI, Mil Zone(s). The property is located approximately 300' north of Orchard St., on the east side of New Suffolk Rd., in New Suffolk; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, February 9, 2004 at 6:05 p.m. in the Meetin,q Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Traveler/VVatchman, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. PetitionedOwner's Name(s): New Suffolk Properties, LLC/New Suffolk Shipyard Date: 1/16/04 Southold Town Plannin.q Board Notice to Adiacent Property Owner~ You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#s1000-117-5-29.1; That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the R-40 Zoning District; 4. That the application is for two boat storage racks as follows: Rack A equals 14' x 76' and Rack B equals 14'x 50' and stores a total of 36 boats on a 2.267 acre parcel in the MI, Mil Zone(s). The property is located approximately 300' north of Orchard St., on the east side of New Suffolk Rd., in New Suffolk; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1936; 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, .February 9, 2004 at 6:05 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such heari~~ublished at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in th~ published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have, the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. ~. ~ _ Petit oner/Owner's Name(s)' New Suffolk Pro erties LLC/Uew · P , Suffolk Shipyard · Date: 1/16/04 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTIN(~ This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon, Fri., 2/6/04 Re: .Proposed Site Plan for New Suffolk Shipyard Boat Rack.. SCTM#s: 1000-117-5-29.1 Date of Hearing: Monday, February 9, 2004, 6:05 p.m. '§~§8-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING · Chapter §8 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 58-1 § 58-1. Provtdtngnottce ofpublle hearings, [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 12-27-[995 as L.L. No. 25-1995; Amend~nents noted where applicable.] § Ii8-1. Providi.g notioo of publio hearing. , ,Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing, this section d~ali apply. Upon determining that an al~plicatton is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public heario4~ thereon, The board or commission reviewing an application shall provide for the giving of notice: A~ By'causing a notice giving the time, date, prate and nature of the hearing to be published in the oflioial newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. 'By requiring the applicant to erect the sign prevldod by the town, which shall bo prominently displayed on the premlaes facing each public Or private street which the property involved in the application abutz, giving notice of the application, the nature of the approval thereby and the time and pla~e of the' public hear~nff therce~ The sign zh_.ll bo ~ot back not more th_.v_ ton (10) foot from the' pro~t~ li~.e. The ~ shall be 'dis~la~d, for a period of ao~ 1o~ 'than ~van CO Immediately preoedinE the d~to .of'~ho publto .1'a~.~!!.~n~ _t 0r...hl~_.~.. _a~m~ ~ ..h~t!.~ ~e ah aflt&vit.that' O. By requirtug tl~e aPpHoaut to ~ond uotio~ to the of rocerd of every property whioh i~butz and property which is across from any public or private street 5801 ~-~-~ § 58-1 sOUTHOLD CODE from the property included in the application. Such notice shall be made by certified ms_il, retun~ receipt requested, posted at least seven (7) day~ prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll, The applicant or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision. 6802 NEW SUFFOLK PROPERTIES, LLC NEW SUFFOLK SHIPYARD SITE PLAN 1000-117-5-29.1 Proposal for two boat storage racks as follows: Rack A equals 14'x 76' and Rack B equals 14' x 50' and stores a total of 36 boats on a 2.287 acre parcel in the MI, Mil Zone. MON.- FEBRUARY 9, 2004- 6:05 P.M. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-9502 Telephone (631) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett Orlowski, Planning Board Chairman FROM: Michael J. Verity, Building Department DATE: December 29 2003 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: New Suffolk Shipyard Location: 6775 New Suffolk Road SCTM# 1000 - Section 117- Block 0~5 - Lot 29. I Date: December 13, 1999 Revised Date: November 5, 2003 1. ALL BUILDiNGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 45 AND 100 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITy OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE EXISTING MARINA AND BOATYARD WITH PROPOSED Boat Racks ARE PERMITTED USES IN THIS M I & M II DISTRICT AND ARE SO CERTIFIED. * See application No. 5149 from the Board of Appeals. Michael J. Verity Chief Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 9, 2003 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for New Suffolk Shipyard Boat Racks Located at approximately 300' north of Orchard Street, on the east side of New Suffolk Road, in New Suffolk SCTM#1000-117-5-29.1 Zone: MI & Mil, Marine Districts Dear Ms. Moore: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 8, 2003: WHEREAS, the proposed site plan, to be known as the site plan for the New Suffolk Shipyard, is for two boat storage racks as follows: Rack A equals 14'x 76' and Rack B equals 14'x 50' and stores a total of 36 boats on a 2.287 acre parcel in the MI, Mil Zones; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, makes a determination that the proposed action is a Type II and is not subject to review pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617.5. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~) Chairman 03 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Lax~ 51020 Main Road Southo[d, New York 1 ] 971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 6317654G~3 p.1 ~AC-~!Mii-E COVSR SklEE7 The pages comprJszng %his facsLmile transmzssion contain confidential Information from Patricza C. Moore. Thls information zs intende~ se!ely for use by the individual entity named as the recipient hereof. If you are non the inmended recipient, be aware that any disclcsure, copying, distribution, or use of mhe contenms of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this mransrrission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may ~rrange ~o retrieve this cransmissicn at no cost to yo~. TO_A~ },UTfBER OF PAGES i~$CLLrDING COV-.EP.. SHEET PLEASE ~' ? ~ ~ BACK AS SOON Nov 2I 03 !0:33a Moore Law O£?i. ce Peggy 6317~S4G43 §$09~ Ro~ 115 ,~Jlold, ~evz York 11~71-0959 Telepho~ ¢~1) p.1 ~001 BOARD OF TOWN TRUS~i'RE$ TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Mar~h 25, 2003 ?atricia C. Moore, Bsq. $10~0 Main Road South. old, NY 11971 RE; SC'I,'M#117-05-28.] ,¥~w Suffoi~ B oad ~¥ew Suffolk, New Yor~ D~.r Ms. ~,ioore: lh~ Board of Town Tnsstees took the £ollowiuB ~clion during a Regular M¢~dug, held on March 18e', 2003 regarding the above ma~te~. WHERI~A$, Patetd~ C. Moore, Esq.. cm behalf of.New Suffolk Sh/py~ applied to/he $outhold Town Tru~t~z Iora pem~i! u.,xier the provizions of the Wetland Ordinance ol'~he Town of Seuthold, ~pplicatiou dated Februezy 11, 2003 WHEREAS, s~d applkation was r~f~-r~ to lhe Sou~old Town Cons~r~elion AdvmOry CoUnCil for th¢i~ fl2~ngs s-d rct~v, menda~im~, and WH.BREAS, a Pubhc Hearing was ksld by the To~, r~te~ wi~h rc~t to {~d a~li~ou ~ M~h, 8 , ~003 ~ which ~c ~l mt~e~d ~t~n~ w~re ~ven ~ oppo~W ~ be h~ and, ~, ~5 B0~ Irt~n~rs havg persm~a~ ~cwcd ~d ~c f~ ~ ~e ~c~s in questmn ~d ~a ~o~ng ~ ~ WH~P~. A,., ~¢ Board h~ con{Jdered a I the :~{tm~orry aad docume~tatiou submittal '.:once,tang t~s application, and, ~ov ~1 0~ 1~1 0~:40 p.3 WIq. EREAS, g,.e ~c~u~e cmnpE~s ~th the ~tand~rd set forth i~. Chapter 9%1 g of tlxe $outhold ~owa Ccute W1TEILEAS, ~d~ Bom'cl. has detmnmed that the project as proposed will not affect the health, S~£ery and general 'amlfar¢ ofth~ p~oplc ofth~ town. NOW TI'IB.~.I~ OR~ BE IT, RESOLVED, flxat thc B~d of~t~s ~ov~ d:e ~c~on of ~W SU~OLK $~Y~, for a W~l~d P~t to ~ rack ~oragc of 15' to 2~' boa~, ~ ti~ ~ system ~rack stooge is prefe=~ s~cm ~ p~ stmp~ m~ dated pl~ 3/18/03 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that ~i~s detm'mination should not be considered a mad~ fm any other Department or A~ency, which may also have an application pmding for same r,r stmilar project. Fee mutq be paid~ if ~pl~ca'~te and permit issuod ~ithin six montl~ of the date oft.Ma notiticatior, I~m~ec,qcns ;~-¢ rcquixed at a ~se o! $5.00 per inspec5on. (See a.~tach~ FEES: Non* Albe, tt )'. lc. xap~i, Jr. Prc~ideut. B~ard of Trustees AJK/cjc cc DEC PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: November 19, 2003 To: From: Re: James A. Richter, R.A., Engineer Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plen Reviewer,//',~ Revised site plan for New Suffolk Shipyard (Boat Racks) 6775 New Suffolk Avenue New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-5-29.1 Zoned MI&MIl Status: Active Site Plan pro~0sed for Type II action SEQRA determination at the December 8, 2003 public meeting. Required Return Date: ASAP In reference to the above, attached you will find a revised site plan. The plan notes the items required per the ZBA appeal. Please add it to the site plan sent to you on 09/11/03. Please review for comments, concerns and approval. This site plan reflects the comments in your letter dated September 23, 2003. This site plan is for two boat storage racks as follows; rack A equals 14'x 76' and rack B equals 14'x 50' and stores a total of 36 boats on 2.287 acres parcel in the MI & Mil Zone(s) located at New Suffolk Rd., New Suffolk in New Suffolk. SCTM#(s) 1000-117-5-29.1 Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Peconic Surveyors, dated 12/13/99 and last revised 11/05/03, received by the Planning Board 11/17/03. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: November 19, 2003 To: From: I~e: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer,/~ Revised site plan for New Suffolk Shipyard (Boat Racks) 6775 New Suffolk Avenue New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-5-29.1 Zoned MI&MIl Status: Active Site Plan proposed for Type II action SEQRA determination at the December 8, 2003 public meeting. Required Return Date: ASAP In reference to the above, attached you will find a revised site plan. The plan notes the items required per the ZBA appeal. Please add it to the site plan sent to you on 09/11/03and 09/29/03. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. This site plan is for two boat storage racks as follows; rack A equals 14'x 76' and rack B equals 14'x 50' and stores a total of 36 boats on 2.287 acres parcel in the MI & Mil Zone(s) located at New Suffolk Rd., New Suffolk in New Suffolk. SCTM#(s) 1000-117-5-29.1 Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Eric.: 1 Site plan prepared by Peconic Surveyors, dated 12/13/99 and last revised 11/05/03, received by the Planning Board 11/17/03. November 17, 2003 Bruno Semon Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re~ PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 New Suffolk Shipyard SCTM# 1000-117-05 -29.1 Dear Bruno: In response to your September 29, 2003 letter enclosed please find Long EAF for the subject application. Also enclosed is the DEC permit and revised site plans dated November 5, 2003 which include the following: The site plan includes the existing buildings- only the boat storage racks are shown as proposed. The surveyor has shown the parking for the existing Marina with 58 boat slips, 5 employees and 2 spaces for the retail sales. The Storage buildings are existing and the parking for the boat slips more than Crovides for the use in the storage buildings. The storage buildings provide work space for the boats in the slips and the use is accessory to the Marina use. The new dry racks for 36 boats provides for an additional 18 spaces. A total of 83 spaces is required, however, the surveyor has provided for 82 spaces which could actually function. The board should consider further reducing the number of spaces given the use of the Marina as a community Marina. The parking must be surfaced with pervious blue stone therefore bumper guards will delineate the spaces. The Drainage calculations have been revised in accordance with the Town Engineer's comments. Four (4) Handicap parking spaces have been shown by the surveyor. If an additional space is required please advise. The Handicap spaces require paving, impervious surfaces are discouraged by the DEC. The lighting (flood lights and area lights) are shown on the site plan. These are existing conditions, no lighting is proposed for the Dry Racks. My client is anxious to complete the site plan review and construct the storage racks for this winter season. These racks are accessory structures preferred by Environmental Agencies, we would appreciate your cooperation in seeing that the site plan process does not become overwhelming. Very- IGl~yo _uts, (--~P~i~i~ia/C.~oore cc: New Suffolk Shipyard NEW YOR.w'~' DEC PERMIT NUMBER ~ 1~4738-00941/00007 FACILITY/PROGRAM NUMBER(S) ,TE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL COi~VATION OPERMIT EFFECTIVE DATE March 31, 2003 EXPIRATION DATE(S) March 31, 2008 TYPE OF PERMIT · New [] Renewal [] Modification [] Permit to Construct [] Permit to Operate [] Article 15, Title 5: Protection of Waters [] Adicle 15, Title 15: Water Supply [3 Article 15, Title 15: Water Transport [] Article 15, Title 15: Long Island Wells [] A~ticle 15, Title 27: Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers [] 6NYCRR 608: Water Quality Certifica- tion [] Article 17, Titles 7, 8: SPDES [] Article 19: Air Pollution Control [] Article 23, Title 27: Mined Land Reclamation [] Article 24: Freshwater Wetlands · Article 25: Tidal Wetlands [] Article 27, Title 7; 6NYCRR 360: Solid Waste Management [] Article 27, Title 9; 6NYCRR 373: Hazardous Waste Management [] Article 34: Coastal Erosion Management [] Article 36: Floodplain Management [] Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 27, 37; 6NYCRR 380: Radiation Control PERMIT ISSUED TO New Suffolk Properties, LLC ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE P.O. Box 276, New Suffolk, NY 11956 rTELEPHONE NUMBER (631)734-6311 CONTACT PERSON FOR PERMITTED WORK Patricia C. Moore, 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 TELEPHONE NUMBER (631)765-4330 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT/FACILITY New Suffolk Shipyard, New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk SCTM #1000-117-5-29.1 COUNTY TOWN WATERCOURSE I NYTM COORDINATES I Suffolk Southold School House Creek DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY: Install upland storage racks for 36 boats. Install fence. All work must be done in accordance with the attached plans stamped N¥SDEC approved. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compliance with the ECL, all applicable regulations, the General Conditions specified (see page 2 & 3) and any Special Conditions included as part of this permit. PERMIT Al )MINISTRATOR: ;land ion · #40, SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 DATE March 31, 2003 Page 1 of 4 NEW~ ENTOFENVIRONMENTALCONSER~N SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Any debris or excess material from construction of this project shall be completely removed from the adjacent area (upland) and removed to an approved upland area for disposal. No debris is permitted in tidal wetlands and or protected buffer areas, 2. The storage of construction equipment and materials shall be confined to existing parking area. DEC PERMITNUMBER r I PAGE 2 of 4 1-4738-00941/00007 ~ NE K STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL C__ONSE ON If future operations by the State of New York require an alteration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the people of the State, or cause loss or destrucfion of the natural resources of the State, the owner may be ordered by the Department to remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused thereby without expense to the State, and if, upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed, the owners, shall, without expense to the ~tate, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation, or for other purposes, and no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. 3. Granting of this permit does not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of obtaining any other permission, consent or approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast Guard, New York State Office of General Services or local government which may be required. 4. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the project. 5. Any material dredged in the conduct of the work herein permitted shall be removed evenly, without leaving large refuse piles, ridges across the bed of a waterway or floodplain or deep holes that may have a tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of a waterway. 6. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work herein authorized. 7. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the project hereby authorized has not been completed, the applicant shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. If granted under 6NYCRR Part 608, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation hereby certifies that the subject project will not contravene effluent limitations or other limitations or standards under Sections 301,302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217) provided that all of the conditions listed herein are met. 9. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the permittee and contractor shall sign and return the top portion of the enclosed notification form certifying that they are fully aware of and understand all terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 days of completion of project, the bottom portion of the form must also be signed and returned, along with photographs of the completed work and, if required, a survey. 10. All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or his agent as part of the permit application. Such approved survey was.prepared by John Metzqer last revised 3/8/03. DEC PERMIT NUMBER 1-4738-00941/00007 PAGE 3 OF 4 NEW Y K STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSER ION Item A: Permittee Accepts Legal Responsibility and Agrees to Indemnification The permittee expressly agrees to indemnity and hold harmless the Department of Environmental Conservation of the State of New York, its representatives, employees, and agents ("DEC") for all claims, suits, actions, and damages, to the extent attributable to the permittee's acts or omissions in connection with the permittee's undertaking of activities in connection with, or operation and maintenance of, the facility or facilities authorized by the permit whether in compliance or not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. This indemnification does not extend to any claims, suits, actions, or damages to the extent attributable to DEC's own negligent or intentional acts or omissions, or to any claims, suits, or actions naming the DEC and arising under article 78 of the New York Civil Practice Laws and Rules or any citizen suit or civil rights provision under federal or state laws. Item B: Permittee's Contractors to Comply with Permit The permittee is responsible for informing its independent contractors, employees, agents and assigns of their responsibility to comply with thfs permit, including all special conditions while acting as the permittee's agent with respect to the permitted activities, and such persons shall be subject to the same sanctions for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for the permittee. Item C: Permittee Responsible for Obtaining Other Required Permits The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals, lands, easements and rights-of-way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit. Item D: No Right to Trespass or Interfere with Riparian Rights This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights, flue, or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. GENERAL CONDITIONS General Condition 1: Facility Inspection by the Department The permitted site or facility, including relevant records, is subject to inspection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department) to determine whether the permittee is complying with this permit and the ECL. Such representative may order the work suspended pursuant to ECL 71-0301 and SAPA 401(3). The permittee shall provide a person to accompany the Department's representative during an inspection to the permit area when requested by the Department. A copy of this permit, including all referenced maps, drawings and special conditions, must be available for inspection by the Department at all times at the project site or facility. Failure to produce a copy of the permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit. General Condition 2: Relationship of this Permit to Other Department Orders and Determinations Unless expressly provided for by the Department, issuance of this permit does not modity, supersede or rescind any order or determination previously issued by the Department or any of the terms, conditions or requirements contained in such order or determination. General Condition 3: Applications for Pen'nit Renewals or Modifications The permittee must submit a separate written application to the Department for renewal, modification or transfer of this ~ermit. Such application must include any forms or supplemental information the Department requires. Any renewal, modification or transfer granted by the Department must be in writing. The permittee must submit a renewal application at least: a) 180 days before expiration of permits for State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES), Hazardous Waste Management Facilities (HWMF), major Air Pollution Control (APC) and Solid Waste Management Facilities (SWMF); and b) 30 days before expiration of all other permit types. Submission of applications for permit renewal or modification are to be submitted to: NYSDEC Regional Permit Administrator, Region 1, SUNY Bldg #40, Stony Brook NY 11790-2356 General Condition 4: Permit Modifications, Suspensions and RevocatiOns by the Department The Department reserves the right to modify, suspend or revoke this permit in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 621. The grounds for modification, suspension or revocation include: a) materially false or inaccurate statements in the permit application or supporting papers; b) failure by the permittee to comply with any terms or conditions of the permit; c) exceeding the scope of the project as described in the permit application; d) newly discovered material information or a material change in environmental conditions, relevant technology or applicable law or regulations since the issuance of the existing permit; e) noncompliance with previously issued permit conditions, orders of the commissioner, any provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law or regulations of the Department related to the permitted activity. DEC PERMIT NUMBER 1-4738-00941/00007 IPAGE 4 OF 4 CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT 260 New Suffolk Road, PO Box 930. Cutchogue, NY 11935 Telephone (631) 734-6907 o Fax (631) 734-7079 October 3, 2003 Planning Board Office Bruno Semon POBox 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Reft New Suffolk Shipyard Dear Semon, With reference to the above property, the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Cutchogue Fire District do not recommend a fire well is needed due to the properties location within range of an existing fire well or hydrant district and is adequately protected. Thank you ibr your request and please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Board of Fire Commissioners Matthew J. Martin District Secretary OCT 6 2003 Soulho!d To~vn PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: September 29, 2003 To: From: Re: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer/~,/.-- Addition Landscape Plan and elevation details for site plan certification for New Suffolk Shipyard (Boat Racks) 6775 New Suffolk Avenue New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-5-29.1 Zoned MI&MIl Status: Active Site Plan proposed for review and approval. Required Return Date: October 10, 2003 In reference to the above, attached you will find a landscape plan of the site plan and elevation details. The plan notes the items required per the ZBA appeal. Please add it to the site plan sent to you on 09/11/03. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. This site plan is for two boat storage racks as follows; rack A equals 14'x 76' and rack B equals 14'x 50' and stores a total of 36 boats on 2.287 acres parcel in the MI & Mil Zone(s) located at New Suffolk Rd., New Suffolk in New Suffolk. SCTM#(s) 1000-117-5-29.1 Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Araiys Design, dated 02/04/03 and received by the Planning Board 09/15/03 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Ch~rman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 September 29, 2003 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site plan for New Suffolk Ship Yard 6775 New Suffolk Avenue New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-5-29.1 Zone: MI &MII Dear Mr. Moore, This letter is to reiterate on our conversation the other day, we are still in need of the £ollowing. In reviewing the site plan application materials submitted to the office, the Planning Board found the following elements to be deficient. The site plan application will need to include the following to be processed further: 1. As required please submit an executed EAF part 2 (617.20) form. 2. Include a complete breakdown of preexisting uses in as built buildings with actual square foot area of each use, show the required parking per town code and actually parking provided on the as built site plan. In addition detail the required parking for the new boat racks and provided parking. 3. Change the parking spaces in accordance with Town requirements that actually function. 4. Detail how the parking spots will be noted and marked as shown on site plan. 5. The handicap access locations must meet NYS code requirements. 6. Detail all as built and new lighting on site plan if any. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (//R~,~/~,~urs, CC:file PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 29, 2003 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re~ Engineers letter on the site plan for New Suffolk Ship Yard 6775 New Suffolk Avenue New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-5-29.1 Zone: MI & Mil Dear Mr. Moore, Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated September 23, 2003 from the Southold Town Engineer. Please review the enclosed letter and comments. Please revise the site plan as required based on the comments of the Town Engineer. Submit the revised site plan to the Planning Board for review; we will need the revision to continue the site plan process. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Re~s~l)fu~ y yours, .,f Br~ Sc~fion Se~nior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETTORLOWSK/,JR. Ch~rman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Ha11,53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone(631) 765-1938 Fax(631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 29, 2003 Patricie Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re~ New Suffolk Ship Yard minutes of A.R.C. Meeting 6775 New Suffolk Avenue New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-5-29.1 Zone: MI &MII Dear Mr. Moore, This letter is to inform you that the above listed.site plan application was reviewed at the Architect Review Committee (ARC) meeting held on September 23, 2003. Attached you will find a copy of the minutes from the meeting. Please review the minutes and inform us if you are in agreement with the condition. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 ext. 229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviexver CC:file enc. ARC minutes SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE September 23, 2003 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30pm Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman. Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Herbert Adler, Jr.,Landmarks Preservation Committee Herbert Ernst, Southold Sanford Hanauer, Mattituck Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary SEP 2 6 Tow~ ;oard Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff, Nancy Steelman, Lisa Callaghan and Patrick Metres for North Fork Foods; Patricia Moore and Michael Irving for New Suffolk Shipyards; Joseph J. Frohnhoefer II, Joseph J. Frohnhoefer FI. Breft Kehl and Gall Wickham for Sea/ow Services; and Thomas McCarthy for Mattituck Self Storage. Moved by Herbert Adler and seconded by Sanford Hanauer, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meetings of August 5 and August 11,2003. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. NORTH FORK FOODS (North Road - Southold) It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Herbert Ernest to APPROVE the application as submitted. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. Applicants are r~!.~.~d that deviat OhS from approved plans without the review and approval af~e A~hitectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may h?gatively impact secur ng the Certificate of Occupancy. It was RESObVED by Robert Brown and seconded by Garrett Strang tqthank the Planning Board for the referral but to acknowledge that there are no architectural characteristics that bear comment. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. SEA TOW SERVICES (Boisseau Avenue - Southold) In aPRE-SUBMISSIONdiscussiontheownersdesc~ibeda proposed headquarters building and adjacent storage spaces, including a new steel building The Con-~rnittee found the plans agreeable ln concept, suggesting Hardie Plank rather than Vinyl as it was proposed fo~ the siding and asking for final plans a schedule of finishes and samples MATTITUCK SELF- STORAGE (Wickham Avenue) It was RESOLVED by Herbert Adler and seconded by Herbert Ernstto APPROVE the application with the CONDITIONS that a final schedule of colors be submitted alon9 with the design of the signage Vote of the Committee; Ayes all Applicant~ are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impace securing the Certificate of Occupancy. VAN DUZER GAS SERVICE COMPANY (North Road - Southold) It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Sanford Hanauer to APPROVE the schedule of finishe~das submitted. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy, CHRIS MOHR LAWN AND LANDSCAPE (North Road - Cutchogue) Itwas RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Herbert Adler that the application be APPROVED with the CONDITION that the barn be sided the same as the garage or with some alternative materialto be submitted, rather than T 111~ Vote of the Committee: Ayes All except Garrett Strang who had recused himself Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will, cause recision of the original approvat and may nega?vely impact securihg'th'e C~t~icate, off Occupancy. ; ,~ · ~,~:? ".,,' · ?;' ~ .. . SILVER NAILS WINERY' (l~lain Road - Southold) It was RESOLVED by Sanfo'rd Hanauer ~nd seconded by Hecbett Ernest to APPROVE the APPLICATION as resubmitted Vote of the Committee: Ayes All Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and appro,,/~:fl of the Alchitectural Review Committee will cause I(:c~s~on of the original apploval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy Robed W, Keith Secretacy SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE September 23, 2003 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m. Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman. Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Herbert Adler, dr,Landmarks Preservation Committee Herbert Ernst, Southold Sanford Hanauer, Mattituck Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary, Aisc present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff, Nancy Steelman, Lisa Callaghan and Patrick Metres for North Fork Foods: Patricia Moore and Michael Irving for New Suffolk Shipyards; Joseph J. Frohnhoefer II, Joseph J. Frohnhoefer Ill, Brett Kehl and Gall Wickham for Seatow Services: and Thomas McCarthy for Mattituck Self Storage. $0uth0ld Town Board Moved by Herbert Adler and seconded by Sanford Hanauer, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meetings of August 5 and August 11 2003 Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. ' NORTH FORK FOODS (North Road - Southold) It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Herbert Ernest to APPROVE the application as submitted. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. NEW SUFFOLK SHIPYARD (New Suffolk) It was RESOLVED by Robert Brown and seconded by Garrett Strang to thank the Planning Board for the referral but to acknowledge that there are no architectural characteristics that bear comment. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. SEA TOW SERVICES (Boisseau Avenue- Southold) in a PRE-SUBMISSION discussion the owners described a proposed headquarters building and adjacent storage spaces, including a new steel building The Committee found the plans agreeable in concept, suggestin9 Hardie Plank rather than Vinyl as it was proposed for the siding and asking for final plans, a schedule of finishes and samples. MATTITUCK SELF- STORAGE {Wickham Avenue) It was RESOLVED by Herbert Adler and seconded by Herbe¢ Ernstto APPROVE the application with the CONDITIONS that a final schedule of colom b~ '~.ibmltIod along with the design of the signage Vote of the Committee Ayes all Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impace securing the Certificate of Occupancy, VAN DUZER GAS SERVICE COMPANY (North Road - Southold) It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Sanford Hanauer to APPROVE the schedule of finisheC'as submitted Vote of the Committee: Ayes All, Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy, CHRIS MOHR LAWN AND LANDSCAPE (North Road - Cutchogue) It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Herbert Adler that the application be APPROVED with the CONDITION that the barn be sided the same as the garage or with some alternative material to be submitted, iather than T 1 11 Vote of the Committee: Ayes All except Garrett Strang who had recused himself Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy SILVER NAILS WINERY (Main Road - Southo!d) It was RESOLVED by Sanford Hanauer and seconded by i.-ielbert [L¢¢~<,::: ,~ APPROVE the APPLICATION as resubmitted Vote of the Committee: Ayes Applicants; a~e reminded that deviations from appioved plans \,/iti~oLit and app~o,ai ,~f the Arclfitectu~al Review Committee will cau~o r,,c, ;,or~ ~, ~',, o~lginai approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate, O c c u p a n c Y~ O3elt ~;OC dL] : PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary September 15, 2003 Bruno Semon Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 by fax Re: Dear Bruno: New Suffolk Shipyard SCTM#1000-117-05-29.1 In accordance with your request enclosed please find the following: 1) 6 prints of Planting Plan dated 2-4-03 prepared by Araiys Design, Landscape Architect 2) 6 prints of the cross sections of the Boat Rack (2 boat, 3 boat system and side panel) 3) We will bring to the ARC meeting sample materials The racks have no lighting. The existing building has security lighting which is not the subject of review. The history of this property is as follows: The Marina and Boat repair facilities predate zoning. In 1994 an existing storage building was replaced with a smaller metal building. In 1994 the Trustees and the DEC approved the location of the building with a boat storage rack at the location where a covered porch existed. The rack was never constructed and is now the subject of this application. The building department issued a building permit for the replacement building. The building department and Planning Board determined that no site plan was required in 1994. However, the Planning Board would have reviewed the existing structures and replacement structure and made a determination at a work session. The current site plan was prepared in 1994 by Peconic Surveyors (see attached plan). The same plan was used and revised for the current application, the surveyor has added the proposed racks and parking. We have submitted a site plan for the storage racks but respectfully request that you recognize the fact that the existing structures are not being changed. The building department issued building permits for the existing conditions, we are not revisiting the existing plan. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. Very./ruly~.ours, cc: New Suffolk Shipyard Gep 04 03 IOt23a Idill~&m H. Roof 407-855-8131 p.2 ROOF & iNC 1~0 NOITI'H DIXIE HII~iWAY . BOCA RATON, FL 3M3~ · (561) 398.4;~r. FAX (561) 3~4796 I (d~ \ I ~0 ~3~d ~3I'NMNII~ 9ELLSLSISL gS:PI SIp 04 03 1Q:23m ~11~&m H. RaoP 4Q~-855-~131 ROOF & P'~CK, iNC. 1890 NORTH DIXIE HIGHWA Y o BOCA RA TON, FI. 3,.,1,t12 · (~ I ) ,,I~34 7~ ? * FAX (561) 393~ 7~6 2-3/4"xl-3 A325 BOLTS AND NUTS PER CONNECTION TIGHTEN X-SEC?T0 SQUARE RACK Z GROUND LATERAL STRUCTRAL BRACING H BEAM X-BRC. LATERAL STRUCTRAL BRACING H BEAM Z TO BE LEVEL AND COMPACTED JOSHUA Y. HORTON SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (516)-765- 1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel.(516)-765 -1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Re; September 23, 2003 New Suffolk Shipyard Site Plan SCTM #: 1000 - 117 - 05 - 29.1 As per your request, I have reviewed the site plan for the above referenced project. I do realize that this site review is primarily that of an existing condition but I will attempt to evaluate the plan as if it were a newly proposed facility. Some of the items may be deemed too excessive when you consider the scope of proposed new work but I offer the following for your review. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Drainage calculations indicate that the area for buildings & concrete pavement areas are approximately 12,747 Sq. Ft. Preliminary calculations appear to suggest that this number is approximately 20% shy of the actual area. Calculations should be adjusted accordingly. Drainage calculations indicate a runoff coefficient of 0.3 for stone blend parking areas. This should be 0.6. Calculations should be adjusted accordingly. Details and/or Sections of the proposed leaching pools should be shown or indicated on the plan. Leaching pools should be numbered and test hole information should be provided to indicate soil type and ground water elevations. Leaching pool invert & top of grate elevations should be provided and pavement contours or surface flow direction indicators should be shown to maintain a positive pitch of all parking areas away from all tidal waters. A trench drain should be constructed at the landward edge of any proposed boat ramp. This drain should be directly connected to one or more leaching pools. Leaching pools should be located at each entrance to the proposed facility immediately adjacent to New Suffolk Avenue. The southerly most entrance to this site has an existing drainage problem. This problem should be addressed by the project Engineer and the engineered drainage design should be shown or indicated on the site plan. The parking layout does not appear to function properly. Spaces do not appear to have adequate clearances for access and some spaces seem to block entry into others. If you have any questions regarding this review or if you would like to discuss this site plan in more detail, please contact my office. CC: Peter Hards (Superintendent of Highways) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: September 11, 2003 To: From: Re: James A. Richter, R.A., Engineer Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer(/~ Bruno Site Plan Approval for New Suffolk Shipyard (Boat Racks) 6775 New Suffolk Avenue New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-5-29.1 Zoned MI&MIl Status: Active Site Plan proposed for review and approval. Required Return Date: October 10, 2003 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments and concerns. This site plan is for two boat storage racks as follows; rack A equals 14'x 76' and rack B equals 14'x 50' and stores a total of 36 boats on 2.287 acres parcel in the MI & Mil Zone(s) located at New Suffolk Rd., New Suffolk in New Suffolk. SCTM#(s) 1000-117-5-29.1 Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Peconic Surveyors, dated 9/6/03 and received by the Planning Board 09/02/03 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 1197 ~.-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765~3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: September 11,2003 To: From: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector ~. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewe~ Site Plan Certification for New Suffolk Shipyard (Boat Racks) 6775 New Suffolk Avenue New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-5-29.1 Zoned MI&MIl Status: Active Site Plan proposed for review and approval. Required Return Date: October 10, 2003 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. This site plan is for two boat storage racks as follows; rack A equals 14'x 76' and rack B equals 14'x 50' and stores a total of 36 boats on 2.287 acres parcel in the MI & Mil Zone(s) located at New Suffolk Rd., New Suffolk in New Suffolk. SCTM#(s) 1000-117-5-29.1 Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Eric.: 1 Site plan prepared by Peconic Surveyors, dated 9/6/03 and received by the Planning Board 09/02/03 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Matthew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Martin: Enclosed please find one (1) site plan/survey, dated March 8, 2003, for the Site Plan/Subdivision for New Suffolk Shipyard, New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-117-05-29,1 The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fire- wells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. 0 The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recommendation at to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc. 4.1 CUT CHOGU E HARBOR BAY p£CONI¢ GREAT ~_-,~-~I,~,.~.~ ~_~:~] ~,,~,,~'" ,2'""%~,0,~ ~ ~~ CO~TY OF SUFF~~ S~THOLD .~. ~ ~ ~'~ J ~~_ I~Red ~rty Tax Service A~y I ~ I~~, -/.~,~"~1~· ?"~' I¢~ ~.~. ~ooo SECTION NO .PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chs~rman RICHARD CAGGL~NO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 10, 2003 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re~ New Suffolk Ship Yard scheduled A.R.C. Meeting 6775 New Suffolk Avenue New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-5-29.1 Zone: MI &MII Dear Mr. Moore, This letter is to inform you that the above listed site plan application is set for the Architect Review Committee (ARC) meeting on September 23, 2003 at 4:30 pm in the Town Hall in Southold. Attached is an ARC check list which you should refer in preparation for the meeting. Please submit all materials that need to be presented to the ARC before the meeting date or bring the materials with you to the meeting. Please inform us in advance if you will not be ready for the meeting date. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file The following information is to be submitted to the Architectural Rex4ew Committee after the Planning Board notifies you tn wnti g that the application is acceptable. The Planning Board office will attach a copy ora site plan to the following material: Notations as to the type of building construction, proposed occupancy or use and the location of fire separation walls (if it projects beyond the building envelope). Floor plans drawn to scale (1/4" = 1' preferred) Elevation drawings to scale of all sides of each building (1/4" = 1' preferred). The following information shall be shown on the drawings: Type and color of roofing - include sample Type and color of siding - include sample Type of windows and doors to be.used;.material and color of all windows and door frames - include sample Type and color of trim material - include sample · Rendering of building if possible *~ Notation of the type of heating/cooling equipment to be used. Show or indicate exterior locations of all equipment i.e., heat pumps, ak conditioning compressors, etc. on plans and/or elevations. · Type and locations of all roof-mounted mechanical equipment · Type and locations of all mechanical equipment, plumbing and/or atti~ venting through roof or building sidewall. · Type, color and style of proposed masomy material for chimneys or a4cent walls - include samples or photos. . · Details, color, type and style of any proposed ornamentation, awnings, canopies or tents. · · Photos of existing buildings and/or neigtiboring properties from four directions of project site, jf possible. o Type, color and design of all exterior signage, both building-mounted and free standing. Please use this list as a checklist: RegretfUlly, we cannot accept incomplete submissions. Place all materials in a large ma/ilia envelope with your application name printed on the outside. Large samples should be labeled. If you want samples returned, please note same on the label. THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE WOULD BE HAPPY TO MEET WITH YOU AT A PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE PRIOR TO YOUR ACTUAL SUBMISSION PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-4616 Tel: (63 l) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 September 2, 2003 BY HAND Town of Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: New Suffolk Shipyard Dear Planning Board: Enclosed please find my client's check no. 4313 in the sum of $774.30 payable to "Town of Southold" for payment of your site plan fee for the above referenced matter. I do acknowledge that you have returned my client's check no. 4197 in the sum of $300.00 that was previously forwarded to you. Very ['~'~f yours, Patkic~a C. Moore PCM/mr Enc. SEP - 2003 Subject: SCTM#: 1000- Comments: Subnttssion Without a Cover Letter 117- ~5~- ~' I SEP - 2 2O03 § 100-256. Application requirements; fees. A. Submission of a complete site plan application shall consist of: (1) A completed site plan application form. (2) The site plan review fee, as specified in Subsection B below. (3) A completed environmental assessment form. (4) Nine copies oft. he site plan. (5) Four copies o£a property survey, certified by a licensed land surveyor. B. Fees. [Amended 3-27-2001 by L.L. No. 7-2001] (1) Thc application fec for a new site plan shall be $300 per acre or any fraction of an acre thereof, plus $0.05 per square foot of building area. (2) The application fec for a revised site plan shall be $300, plus $0.05 per square foot of building area. 473889 SOUTHOLD NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY O SCHOOL NEW SUFFOLK SC~O PRCLS 570 MARINA 117.-5-29.1 6775 NEW SUFFOLKRD = OWNER & MAILING INFO === NEW SUFFOLK PROPS LLC & NEW SUFFOLK MARINA LLC 6775 NEW SUFFOLK ROAD NEW SUFFOLK NY 11956 =MISC 1 BANK DATE : 09/02/2003 ROLL SEC TAXABLE TOTAL RES SITE TOTAL COM SITE ACCT NO 23 I ASSESSMENT DATA ........... I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT ILAND 11,600 **TAXABLE** ITOTAL 24,700 COUNTY 24,700 **PRIOR** TOWN 24,700 ILAND 11,600 SCHOOL 24,700 ITOTAL 24,700 ==DIMENSIONS ===1 .... -== SALES INFORMATION -= ................................ ACRES 2.25 IBOOK 12010 SALE DATE 12/20/99 SALE PRICE 950,000 IPAGE 929 PR OWNER INTERREAL NEW YORK LAND == ----TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 ............. I== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 4 ..... CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE I FD029 IPK090 IEW020 ISW011 Fi=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=GO TO INVENTORY F9=GO TO XREF F10=GO TO MENU ~,~. APPEALS BOARD MEMBER~ · Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 19, 2003 Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net Appl. No. 5149 - New Suffolk Shipyard Property Location: 5775 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk; 1000-117-5-29.1. SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the properly under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's parcel is 2.287 acres in size with 264.07 feet along the east side of New Suffolk Road in New Suffolk. The properly is managed as a boat yard and marina in a waterfront, boating community. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's March 27, 2002 Notice of Disapproval, citing Section 100- 121C1, in its denial of a building permit to construct accessory open storage racks within the area zoned M-II, proposed at a height over the code's 18 ft. limitation and in an area other than a rear yard. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 20, 2003 and May 1, 2003 with written extended to May 15, 2003, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant's original request is shown on the Peconic Surveyors, P.C. map dated December 13, 1999, revised January 9, 2002, for two open storage racks, noted as follows: (1) rack 'A' at 14' wide x 76' long x 26' high with a location five (5) feet from the closest northerly property line, in between the existing metal/frame building to the west and the shed to the east; and (2) rack 'B' of a size 14' x 50', and proposed to be at a maximum height of 26 feet and will be located inside an open notch immediately abutting the existing 86.2' metal storage building, as shown on the plan prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. dated December 13, 1999, revised January 9, 2002. Rack "A" will have two storage tiers,, and rack "B" will have three storage tiers. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: An an alternative, the applicants submitted a revised plan dated April 30, 2003, by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. The alternative plan shows an increased setback for storage rack "A" from 5 feet to 10 feet from the northerly property line; and includes a plan for a landscape buffer of screening between rack "A" and the northerly property line, as described below. The applicants also confirmed that they wish to withdraw their initial request for a height variance with respect to storage rack "A." REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1Page 2 - June 19, 2003 AppI. No. 5149 - New Suffolk Shipyard 117-5-29.1 at New Suffolk 1. A) Grant of alternative relief with respect to rack "A" will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby propedies. Proposed storage rack "A" will not exceed the code's height limitation of 18 feet and will be ten (10) feet from the closest northerly property line. A landscape buffer will be provided and maintained in the northerly yard adjacent to the northerly house near rack "A". The buffer will consist of 12-14 ft. Eastern Cedar Trees and 6' high slated privacy chain-link fence. B) Grant of alternative relief with respect to rack "B" will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The maximum height of rack "B" will be 26 feet, and will be shielded in tile requested location, within an open notch immediately adjacent and close to the existing 86.2' metal storage building. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance The waterway and wetlands exist along the shorelir]es, and tile applican~ testified that the environmental agencies governing these sensitive enwronmental areas prefer a location tha~ will not impact the waterways. Storage racks are common to all boat yards/shipyards and marinas in the Town of Southold. The only alternative to store the boats is on this type of open rack. 3. The relief granted is substantial relative to open storage rack "A" because it is a 50% reduction in the 20 ft minimum setback requirement of the code The relief granted is substantial relative to storage rock "B" because it is an 8 ft increase in the 18 ft maximum heigh{limitation of the code pedaining to accessory structures. 4. The difficulty was self-created when applicant planned to locate the open storage racks 5. Claims of excessive noise, air pollution, excessive traffic and have been submitted relative to the storage of boats on the proposed open racks. The Board finds no substantial evidence to suggest that the proposed two accessory storage racks will have an adverse impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood, The storage racks will be placed away from traffic areas and traffic circulation and will be placed where large boats have been stored. 6. Grant of alternative relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable applicants to enjoy the benefit of locating accessory storage racks, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. BOARD RESOLUTION: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, on motion by Member Orlando, seconded by Member Oliva, it was RESOLVED, to DENY the variances as applied, and to GRANT ALTERNATIVE RELIEF as follows: Rack 'A' is limited to 18 feet in height to meet the code requirement and shall be a minimum distance of ten (10) feet from the northerly property line, as shown on the revised plan prepared April 30, 2003, by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. 2. Rack '13' is limited to 26 feet height and shall be positioned in the area as requested and shown on the revised plan prepared April 30, 2003, by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. Rage 3 -June 19. 2003 Appl. No. 5149 - New Suffolk Shipyard 117-5-29.1 at New Suffolk 3. A screened, landscape buffer shall be planted and maintained between the northerly property line and proposed rack 'A', and a slatted privacy, chain-link fence in good condition north of the landscape buffer. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Tortora (Chairwoman), Horning, Oliva, and Orlando. Goehringer. This Resolution was duly adopted (4~ Lydi~,~/Tortora, C~airwoman 8/27/03 Approved for Filing Nay: Member PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H, SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To~ From: Re: Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman, Zoning Board of Appeals Bennet Orlowski Jr., Chairman, Planning Bo~ New Suffolk Shipyard Application # 5149 SCTM: 1000-I 17-05-29.1 Date: March 11,2003 The Planning Board reviewed this matter at its Work Session on March 10,2003, and offers the following comments: The applicant proposes two boat storage racks, 26 ft in height, and located in the side yard at less than the required 20' setback. The storage rack on the southerly side of the property is located in close proximity to the existing building, and will not be intrusive. The second storage rack, along the northerly property line, and setback 5 feet, will be landscaped by the applicant. This appears adequate, in light of the actual uses occurring on the abutting property. The Planning Board further reviewed the proposed site plan, the landscaping plan, and the applicant's description of the proposed operation with the applicant and his Attorney. The Planning Board reviewed the availability of adequate parking (83 spaces) for both the current marina operation, and the additional boat storage racks, and feels that because of the seasonal usage of the boat racks, and the local nature of this marina where many customers walk to the facility, sufficient parking can be accommodated on site. Note was made of the area wide shortage of boat slips, and that storage racks of this type help alleviate this overall shortage. Such uses are now common to marinas in the area. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer George Homing Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando TOWN MEMO BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning Board Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman, Zoning Board of Ap~"~______~ March 6, 2003 / ~_ ~'~ Request for Comments - New Suffolk Shipyard/'117-5-29.1// Variance/Site Plan Application Reviews The above variance application (#5149) was submitted to our department, for which a March 20, 2003 public hearing has been scheduled. Your comments are requested concerning the site plan/zoning elements related to the proposed two boat rack structures. For your convenience, we attach a copy of the application. We understand that the applicant's attorney has submitted a site plan amended January 8, 2002 and landscape plan dated February 4, 2003 under the review process. By way of a copy of this letter, we are asking the applicant's attorney to contact your Department (765-1938) directly to determine whether or not other documentation or information has been submitted or may be necessary. The ZBA file is available for review at any time that is convenient for your department. Thank you. cc: Patr~cia C. Moore, Esq. ZBA Members FoP 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILD1NG DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Patricia Moore A/C New Suffolk Properties 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 DATE: March 27, 2002 Please take notice that your application dated March 11, 2002 For permit for construction of two sets pf accessory boat racks at Location of property: 5775 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 117 Block_5 Lot 29.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on a 99,672 square foot lot in the M-II District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XII, Section 100-121C(1), which states, "Accessory uses as set forth in and regulated by 100-31C(1) through (7) of the Agricultural- Conservation District, and subject to the conditions of 100-33 thereof," which states, "In the Agricultural-Conservation District and Low-Density Residential R-80, R-120, R-200, and R- 400 Districts, accessory buildings and structures or other accessory uses shall be located in the required rear yard, subject to the following requirements: "A. Such buildings ~hall not exceed (18) feet in height," and B(4), which states, "On lots containing, in excess of seventy-nine thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine (79,999) square feet, such buildings shall be set back no less than twenty (20) feet from any lot line." {~The first set of proposed boat racks, located on the northern side of the property, are noted as being located in the side yard, five feet from the side lot line and measure +/- 26 feet in height. The second set of proposed boat racks, located on the southern portion of the property, are noted as being located in the side yard and measure +/- 26 feet in height. Total lot coverage, following the proposed addition, would be approxiga-,t~¥ thil:teen~3) percent. , Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: File, ZBA TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF B.U, ILDING INSPECTOR /~/)O~rC~ ~!...~.~).©, ...~...~... ..... DATE OF BU LDING INSPECTOR S DECISION APPEALED: ...... JJ[ .......... r ..... New Suffolk Shipyard TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: I (We) .............................................................. (Appellant) of ....................................................................................... (Tel # 734- 6311 HEREBY APPEAL THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED ,,,~7. Z~/,0~ ......... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED...3./..1-.1-/..0.2. .......... FOR: (x) Permit to Build ( ) Permit for Occupancy ( ) Permit to Use ( ) Permit for As-Built ( ) Other: · 5775 New Suffolk Road New Suffolk M-II 1. Locahon of Property .........................................'. ...................................... Z~on~9 .'w'".,'" e ~ies 117 5 29.1 New burro±K ~rop r~ District 1000 Section, ......... Block ...... Lot(s} ........................ Current Owner ......................... 2. Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, S ~ectlon, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordnance by numbers. D° not quote the law.) XII 121 ( ~ C (1) Article ........ Sect on 100-. ......... SUb-Section .............. , 3. Type of Appeal. Appeal is made herewith for: (X) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( RECEIVED ) A Variance due to lack of access as required by New YorkTown La'AY Chap. 62, Cons. Laws Art. 16, Section 280-A. ) Interpretation of Article .......... Section 100-. ................. ) Reversal or Other: .................................................................. rJ[ .... 4. Previous Appeal. A previous appeal (has) (has not) been made with respect to this properly or wlfh respect fo fhls decision of the Building Inspector (Appeal # ...... Year ....... ). REASONS FOR APPEAL ('Additional sheets may be used with applicant's sl~lnafure): AREA VARIANCE REASONS: (1) An undesirable change will not be produced In the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment fo nearby properties, if granted, because: see attached reasons (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant fo pursue, other than an area variance, because: (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or Impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? ( ) Yes, or ( ) No. This is the MINIMUM that Is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. ( )Check this box ,, USE VARIANCE STANDAR~e~and a~ache~d. Sworj~4~15~-t~ ,_~ (~ppellanfj>r~Co~hodj~ed Agent) ~~ 20~)2~-. (Agent must submit ~from (~wner) ...... ZBA App 0a/00 PAI~ICIA ~. N~ ~1~, ~e ~ N~ Y~ ~mm~ ~Ju~ Reason for Appeal Continued Zoning Board of Appeals re: New Suffolk Properties Pursuant to Town Law section 267b-3 the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals is to analyze and assess the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant against the potentially deleterious effects that a grant of the relief requested would have on the health~ safety and welfare of the effected neighborhood or community. In performing this balancing test, the Zoning Board is charged with the responsibility to consider the five factors enumerated in Town Law Section 267b-3(b). The variance should be granted for the following reasons: 1. No undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if the variance is granted. The subject property is a marina with the accessory storage of boats on the property. Additional boat storage is requested with unenclosed ~Racks". The location of the boat storage racks must be placed out of the way of vehicle and traffic circulation. The rack on the north side is to be located between two existing buildings and in the location where boats are presently stored. The second rack is to be located behind the metal storage building. The adjacent property (n/f Michael Withers) is a private marina and seasonal residence. The rack system will be located where large boats have been historically stored, the rack could be screened with fence or planters, as the Planning Board or Zoning Board may direct. 2. The benefit achieved by some pursue, other than an area enable the Marina to operate boats in a neat and orderly operation relies on Boat consequential boat repairs customers. Rack and meet their demand for boat Shipyard has a storage enables the Marina customer's expectations. In dockage exceeds the supply, 75 person waiting list for sought by the applicant can not be method, feasible for the applicant to variance. Boat storage racks efficiently by locating the manner. A Marina's business storage to maintain the and service for their to function addition the New Suffolk dock space, the dry storage provides alternative dockage to the community. The Boats are stored on the racks and placed in the water when requested. The system is beneficial to the environment, reduces the need for a marina's expansions of docks. 3. The area variance is not substantial The application of the balancing test weighs in favor of the grant of the variance. The open rack is 28' in height which will adequately and safely support the boats. 4. The variance will have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The storage rack will relocate boats presently stored and docked in the Marina. The adjacent property rents their boat slips and therefore maintains a commercial use. 5. The alleged difficulty was not self-created. The Marina is M-II District which at a Marine boat storage is a customary and accessory use. The storage racks were proposed in the location where they will be least visible from New Suffolk Road and from the waterfront properties. The variance requested is the minimum variance practicable given the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant. We respectfully request that the appeal together with any further relief that necessary and reasonable. be granted, is deemed · APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer George Homing Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando TOWN MEMO BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning Board Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman, Zoning Board of Apl~eef~"% ~'¢'~/~ ~. March 6, 2003 ~ ~ ''-¢ ~ Request for Comments - New Suffolk Shipyard ,(117-5-29.1] Variance/Site Plan Application Reviews % j The above variance application (#5149) was submitted to our department, for which a March 20, 2003 public hearing has been scheduled. Your comments are requested concerning the site plan/zoning elements related to the proposed two boat rack structures. For your convenience, we attach a copy of the application. We understand that the applicant's attorney has submitted a site plan amended January 8, 2002 and landscape plan dated February 4, 2003 under the review process. By way of a copy of this letter, we are asking the applicant's attorney to contact your Department (765-1938) directly to determine whether or not other documentation or information has been submitted or may be necessary. The ZBA file is available for review at any time that is convenient for your department. Thank you. cc: Patncia C. Moore, Esq. ZBA Members FoPOa NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Patricia Moore A/C New Suffolk Properties 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 DATE: March 27, 2002 Please take notice that your application dated March 11, 2002 For permit for construction of two sets pf accessory boat racks at Location of property: 5775 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 117 Block5 Lot 29.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grotmds: The proposed construction, on a 99,672 square foot lot in the M-Il District, ~s not permitted pursuant to Article XII, Section 100-121C(1), which states, "Accessory uses as set forth in and regulated by 100-31 C(1) through (7) of the Agricultural- Conservation District, and subject to the conditions of 100-33 thereof," which states, "In the Agricultural-Conservation District and Low-Density Residential R~80, R-120, R-200, and R 400 Districts, accessory buildings and structures or other accessory uses shall be located in required rear yard, subject to the following requirements: "A. Such buildings shall not exceed (18) feet in height," and B(4), which states, "O, lots conta/ning in excess of seventy-nine thousand nine hundred and ninety-hint, (79,999) square feet, such buildings shall be set back no less than twenty (20) feet from any lot line." {~The first set of proposed boat racks, located on the northern side of the property, are noted as being. located in the side yard, five feet fi~om the side lot line and measure +/- 26 feet in height. The second set of proposed boat racks, located on the southern portion of the property, are noted a:; being located in the side yard and measure +/- 26 feet in height. Total lot coverage, following the proposed addition, would be approxi~r~v thixl~m';'~ 3) percent. ~1~"~;~ Signature ..... Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Sonthold Town Building Department. Cc: File, ZBA [ For~Office Use Only: I:ee~CgO, 7~' ~ ~ , , ¥'ASslgned No. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR , DATE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR S DECISION APPEALED: ...... ~.!( ............ t' .............. ~ ....... New Suffolk Shipyard TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: I (We) .............................................................. (Appellant) of ....................................................................................... (Tel # 734- 6311 ) HEREBY APPEAL THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED ,,,~Z2J/,02 ......... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED...3./..1..1./..0.2. .......... FOR: (x) Permit to Build ( ) Permit for Occupancy ( ) Permit to Use ( ) Permit for As-Built ( ) Other: 1. Location of Pronertv 5775 New Suffolk Road, New SUffolk ......... r -' ......................................... ~ ..................................... IoHe M-II c 117 5 29.1 District 1000 Se t on~ ......... Block ...... Lot(s) ........................ Current" New Suffolk Propertie vwner ......................... 2. Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, S.,ecflon, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordnagce~by numbers. Do not quote the law.) Article .~..z.z.... Section 100- .1_21. (~ S~b-Sectlon .... .c...!.1.!.. , 3. Type of Appeal. Appeal is made herewith for: RECEIVED (×) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A Variance due to lack of access as required by New YorkTown LaJtA¥ ! 0 2002 Chap. 62, Cons. Laws Art. 16, Section 280-A. ( ) Interpretation of Article .......... Section 100-. ................. ( ) Reversal or Other: .................................................................. .... 4, Previous Appeal. A previous appeal (has) (has not) been made with respect to this property or with respect fo this decision of the Building Inspector (Appeal # ...... Year ....... ). _REASONS FOR APPEAL (Additional sheets may be used wlfh applicant's sl.clnafure): .AREA VARIANCE REASON.~: - (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, it granted, because: see attached reasons (2) The benefit sought by the appllcant CANNOT be achleved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or Impact on the physical or environmental conditions In the neighborhood or district because: (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? ( ) Yes, or ( ) No. This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and af the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safely, and welfare of the community. STANDAR ar m t and a ache~d. /~da ........ 20/~2-- ( gnafure of AppellQ~o~ed Agent) ~ _] ~. (Agent must submit ~~om ~wn~r) ~ Notary Public ZBA App 08/00 ~IC~ C. M~E Reason for Appeal Continued Zoning Board of Appeals re: New Suffolk Properties Pursuant to Town Law section 267b-3 the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals is to analyze and assess the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant against the potentially deleterious effects that a grant of the relief requested would have on the health, safety and welfare of the effected neighborhood or community. In performing this balancing test, the Zoning Board is charged with the responsibility to consider the five factors enumerated in Town Law Section 267b-3(b). The variance should be granted for the following reasons: 1. No undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if the variance is granted. The subject property is a marina with the accessory storage of boats on the property. Additional boat storage is requested with unenclosed "Racks". The location of the boat storage racks must be placed out of the way of vehicle and traffic circulation. The rack on the north side is to be located between two existing buildings and in the location where boats are presently stored. The second rack is to be located behind the metal storage building. The adjacent property (n/f Michael Withers) is a private marina and seasonal residence. The rack system will be located where large boats have been historically stored, the rack could be screened with fence or planters, as the Planning Board or Zoning Board may direct. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant can not be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Boat storage racks enable the Marina to operate efficiently by locating the boats in a neat and orderly manner. A Marina's business operation relies on Boat storage to maintain the consequential boat repairs and service for their customers. Rack storage enables the Marina to function and meet their customer's expectations. In addition the demand for boat dockage exceeds the supply, New Suffolk Shipyard has a 75 person waiting list for dock space, the dry storage provides alternative dockage to the community. The Boats are stored on the racks and placed in the water when requested. The system is beneficial to the environment, reduces the need for a marina's expansions of docks. 3. The area variance is not substantial The application of the balancing test weighs in favor of the grant of the variance. The open rack is 28~ in height which will adequately and safely support the boats. 4. The variance will have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The storage rack will relocate boats presently stored and docked in the Marina. The adjacent property rents their boat slips and therefore maintains a commercial use. 5. The alleged difficulty was not self-created. The Marina is M-II District which at a Marine boat storage is a customary and accessory use. The storage racks were proposed in the location where they will be least visible from New Suffolk Road and from the waterfront properties. 6. The variance requested is the minimum variance practicable given the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant. We respectfully request that the appeal together with any further relief that necessary and reasonable. be granted, is deemed PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARI) OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 12,2003 Ms. Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Re: New Suffolk Shipyard SCTM: # 1000-117-05-29.1 Dear Ms. Moore: The Planning Depar[ment has received your site plan application. After review, the application was considered incomplete. Please provide the following changes and additions: 1) Additional fees are required for the area (footprint) of both storage racks, since these are considered" structures" for site plan purposes. The calculation for this additional fee should be .05 cents per sq. foot of building area. The sq. footage should also be shown on the Site Plan. 2) A separate Site Plan drawing is required, at a scale of 1 inch equals 20 feet, showing the Zone, all parking and drainage calculations, the names of adjoining properly owners, and a Key map of all land within 500 feet. 3) Landscaping areas and percentages should be indicated on the Site Plan. 4) Clarify if the storage racks will have any lighting, operational or security, 5) Please provide an elevation showing the actual height and dimensions of both storage racks. When this information is received, we will continue processing your application. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very Truly, Senior Planner PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary February 6, 2003 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 (BY HAND) Re: Dear Victor: New Suffolk Shipyard SCTM#1000-117-05-29.1 ~ou~told TowR Plaflflin8 Boa~d Enclosed please find amended site plan application and check for the above referenced property. The Zoning Board has this matter before them for a height variance. Please review the enclosed site plan and landscape plan and please advise me when this matter will be discussed with the Planning Board. so that I can be present. The entire system (both racks) will accommodate only 36 boats, the boats are only 15' to 25' in size. The rack system is, at most, a three tier open racks considered to be "Temporary Structures". Rack A: The rack along the north property line (shown as Rack "A") will be only 2-tier and can accommodate 21 boats. The first tier having a 12' clearance and the second tier a 10' clearance. The total height of Rack "A" is 25'4" (allowing for ground clearance and bar spacing). The location was chosen because it will not be visible from the road and will not be visible to the waterfront property owners or block the waterfront. The landscape plan shows suitable screening. Rack B: The rack along the existing building (shown as Rack "B") will be three-tier for 15 boats. The plan shows the required parking. The parking lot is crushed stone and prevents marked painted parking stalls. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. cc: New Suffolk Shipyard PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chsirman RICHARD CAGGIANO WiLLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: August 21, 2002 To: Gerry Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals From: Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairman, Planning Boar~_~ Re: New Suffolk Shipyard 5557 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-5-29.1 With regard to Application Number 5149, referenced above, the Planning Board offers the following comments: The proposed boat racks on the northerly property line, approximately 76 feet long, are too close to residential uses on the adjacent property. There is virtually no buffer between the properties, and the wire fence affords no screening. Additionally the proposed height of the storage racks would present a sheer wall of boat storage to the neighbors and be very visible from many pelspectives. The Planning Board suggests a maximum height of eighteeu feet at this location, heavily screened, and set back ten feet. We note that no parking is shown or designated on the proposed plan. The Planning Board recommends one space for every two boats stored in the racks, and they should be indicated on the plan. This applies to both storage racks, if they are approved. · Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Lydia A. Tortora George Homing Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando TOWN MEMO BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net TO: FROM: DATE: SUB J: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr.1 Chairman, Planning Board Jerry Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Appeals Board July 24, 2002 Request for Planning Board Coordination Reply The following map reviews are pending before the Zoning Board of Appeals, and calendared for a public hearing and possible decision on August 22, 2002: A. Referral(s) u~der Site Plan Provisions.~.~, ,,.,--~p~l. N°' 51--~-~- 49- New Suffolk ship;ard~// Project Description: Two boat rack structures Location of Property: 5775 New~Suffol~ Road, New Suffolk 117-5-29.1 Appl. No. 5084 - 640 Church St. LLC/Chituk Pools Project Description: Pool Company with Indoor Storage Location of Property: 640 Church Lane, Cutchogue LIO Zone. Would you please forward comments or suggestions on the building layout or site issues that may be of concern to the Planning Board under the site plan or subdivision jurisdiction reviews. By way of a copy of this letter, we are also asking the applicants to contact your Department (765-1938) to determine if original maps, an application, or other documentation may be necessary for your department to commence this preliminary review. Please feel free to review the official ZBA file at any time that is convenient for your staff. Thank you. cc: New Suffolk Shipyard c/o Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 640 Church St. LLC c/o McCarthy Management, Inc. ~" $. 87'55' 40.00' & 8~'03'30' W SCHOOL /fOUs£ ]PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATYLMVI, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 21, 2001 Michael Irving New Suffolk Shipyard New Suffolk Road New Suffolk, NY 11956 Proposed construction of boat racks New Suffolk Shipyard New Suffolk Road SCTM# 1000-117-5-29.1 Dear Mr. Irving, The Planning Board has received your letter of August 15, 2001 regarding the above project. A site plan will be required for this project. A site plan application is enclosed for your convenience. A notice of disapproval and a set back variance will be required for the boat racks which are proposed at ten feet from the property line. If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact this office, k,~ll~-e~r~ ~. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer Encl. Cc: Michael Verity, Building Department BOAT STORAGE SYSTEM NEW SUFFOLK SHIPYARD New Suffolk, N.Y. Submitted 8-15-01 " SALES · SERVICE  FUEL · DOCKAGE STORAGE · SHIPS STORE ~w SUFFOLK SH~¥Am) New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, New York 11956 (631) 734-6311 FAX (631) 734-6246 MICHAEL IRVING newsaffolkship(~aol.com Submitted for review to: Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold 53095 State Road 25 Southold, NY. 11971-0959 Location: New Suffolk Shipyard. The Shipyard is bordered by the property of Michael J. Withers and S.G.&A. Alexander to the North. To the West is New Suffolk Road. To the South and East is School House Creek. Fanning Road is the nearest cross street. Project: To set up a three tier high & d~y storage rack system along the north property also to set the same along the North East wall of the boat storage building. The rack system to he a three tier (uncovered) and would allow the storage of an additional 21 boats (for boats up to 25') on the North property line. The first rack would he three across and the following two will he 2 across. Along the bffflding would he an add'aionat 3 tier 2 boat system allowing storage for an additional 15 boats. Purpose: New Suffolk is a boating community and the demand for slip spaces is strong. The Shipyard's dockage is at 100% with most slips being occupied by larger boats. This leaves little opportunity for local community to have access to dock spaces. The majority oftbe boats is in the 15' to 20' range and are either outboards or stern drives. The Shipyard's goal is to serve the eomniunity. The Shipyard has attempted to serve the community by updating the facility and providing a more attractive setting. This is an expense but can he offset by the demand for dockage. Relief: In order to complete the project the Shipyard would have to seek relief from the Town of Southold's normal 20' required set hack. The racks would be installed with a 10' set back so the boat bows will he in line with the back walls ofthe two existing buildings on the property line. This would allow us to accomplish three items that could he of concern. First the 10' set back would not allow enough room between the bows of the boats and the property line to store the usual accumulation of equipment found at marinas. Second, it would allow enough room to plant a buffer thus screening the racks from neighbors view. Third, it will provide the needed room for a fork track to safely make the swing in and out of the racks. The height of the present storage building will limit the visibility of the racks from the street side of the Shipyard. The rack system will be well hidden and completed in a manner to reduce their visib'dity to the public. Goal: Is to update the Shipyard to support recreational boating in New Suffolk both now and in the future. A financially secure marina is key to a neat and environmentally aware facility. Marinas today need to use every profit point available in order to he secure. The Shipyard needs to serve the small boater and provide access to reasonably price dockage for the community. Respectively Submitted New Suffolk Shipyard Minuteman Boat Handling Equipment Inc. Piymouth, MA Roof& Rack - Of(ers lbtt Affordable, Superior Marine Storage RGIOO/RG200 Portable Yard Stands ~e ROl~ ~d R(]2ffi Y~ S~ off~ m~ior mulu~po~ use md ~abfli~. ~e~vely, the RGi00 a~ RG2~ ~rd Sm~ ~re ~ an ~onomi~l and ~ble m~ stm~ ~olution. Each ~¢ ~y to as~mble wh~¢ you n~ ~. grinds are mad: to ~ ~ a 1~ ~c~ ~ade and off~ ~elin~ pin,eot ofm~ine ~afl f~ ~sy drmn~a ~d ~ge. RGI$00;RG2000 Portable Maintenance Stand The RGIS00 and RG2000 Mamt~ance Slands are [he p,,'rfect addition forthe marine yard. Bailt to su;;purt aaymarlo¢craffup m 1~,0~ ~ 20,0001~. ~ey ofl~r saf~ elevat~ liR r~ ~ rail ~ing a~ling ~. ~ m a ~ ~y f~ romic m~enance ~ ~y ~1~ ~a{rs n[~, ~ ~rior ~ds me e~pl~ely pmtable ~d can ~ ~ for mulliple of~, RG100 Yard Stand RG200 Yard Smd 10,O00 # Capacity 15,006ff Calxacily RGI$00 RG/RW'20 - RG, rRP230 2 ~$h Portable Yard Racks rhe RG/RP220 2 wide 2 high and RG/RI/230 3 wide 2 high standing portable Yard Rackg ate laade of heav~ duty structural sr~l. Aw. il~ble ia your choice of her dipped galvaajz~d or prm~er coate, d mC. al they cee~e in 12' or 15' hcqght configurations. Each is e.~il.y expan~4, fo~ future needs and are designed to store maximum h.~t weight c, apadU~. All no~.'~smry h~dwarc alld 4 point banker bc4trd br.a'd~cCs to ~rec~ the RGffOr220 - 230 systems are inctud~tl. RGCRP 320 - RG330 3 High Portable Yard Racks D~ign~d to mnxlmiz~ your marine ~xorage yard fi'le RGlRY'320 ~d RG~P 330 yard ~ck can store up to 9 marine v~ls efficiently. These Oee slmd~g ~ble Var0 ~cks are ma~ oFC Oannel stmct~a[ stol ~d ~ a~ailable ~ yo~ cho;ce of h~ dip~ galv~i~ ~ pr~ ~[~ m~aL ~e R0~320 md RG/330 Yard ~cks can ~ p~ch~ m 12', ts', 22', 25' m' 27' height c~fig~ati~, Each ts fa~im~ rot ~y furore ra~ and ~e design~ to store m~mum ~at weight mpadti~. Ail R0~320 ~d RGiRP330 Yard ~k are inclad~ N~e: Pertaining law ~ r~ ~ ee~in ~ood lnotker bo~'ds ~r.~ n~' t~..lud~,d'.gth am. ~,,G/RP 3)~tems. lteeommended bunker boards to gve are rough cut non..traat~d Douglass Fir. No. 2 Yellow Pine or *imdar vax)d. For boats up to JO' uae ($"x12~I 4') and 8tgas up to SpeciaI baMght requtrements, sl~e$, coq/~&,urutlons, cuJtcm package.~ and voh~rne orders t~"t. eontact your Roof& Rack,roles repre,~entative fi~r more infiormatlon. Product/on schedules 4-6 ~*vek Thankyot~ ROOF & RACK Roof & Rack, Inc. is the World Leader and Authority in the Dry Storage Marine Construction Industry. Starting in the industry in the mid 1970% Dave & Bill Roof have comprised a team of highly trained personnel who understand the process of building high & dry boat storage systems commonly called Drystackers. We are supported by top manufacturer's representatives from around the world. Roof & Rack is here to assist you, from (oncept to completion, in the development of an appropriate storage fa~ ilily spe( ffically cle~if4,~ed to meet vr~r neerk. THE WORLD'S LARGEST OUR SERVICES Our services range from just drop-shipping mamria]s at your site to offering "On-Time" complete turn key development. Roof & Rack provides your organization with Consulting, Design, Engineering, Permitting, Fabrication and Construction services. We offer complete project manage- ment including contract execution, formal inspections and site plam~ing. XA'e are State Certified General Contractors. We manufacture and construct a wide variety of storage systems from portable free standing racks to fully enclosed rack supported buildings. Whether it is a personal watercraft (PWC) or a 50' high performance boat that you wish to store Roof and Rack can assist you. OUR COMMITMENT All Roo~ & Rack systems are designed utilizing the latest engineering and manufacturing technologies. Every aspect of a Roof & Rack system incorporate only tbe finest quality materials. Every Project is built to meet or exceed the applicable requirements of the American Institute of Steel Construction, (ASIC); the American Iron at~d Steel Institute, (AISI); the Metal Building Manufactures' Association, (MBMA) and the American Concrete Institute (ACI). PORTABLE FREE STANDING RACKS EGLIN AIR FORCE ~ASE~ FT. WALTON BCH, FLORIDA MANUFACTURERS INVENTORY RAC[S REGAL MARINE INDUSFRIES, ORLANDO, FLORIDA "Our commitment is to see that all of our customers are just as happy at the completion of the job as they are at the beg~nning."~ Bill & Dave Roof ROOF ONLY OUTDOOR RACKS WILLIAMS CAPRI, ISLE OF CAPRI/ FLORIDA PORTABLE PWC RACK 3 SIDED STORAGE FACILITY MARINA DEL SOL, CLEAR LAKE, TEXAS PORTABLE FREE ROOF ONLY 3 SIDED GABLED STANDING ]~ACK RACK STORAGE FACILITY STORAGE FACILITY ~ ~4. 07' 7'0~?0' E. 40.00' ' APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Lydia A. Tortora George Horning Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando TOWN MEMO BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net TO: FROM: DATE: SUB J: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning Board Jerry Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Appeals Boar~ July 24, 2002 Request for Planning Board Coordination Reply The following map reviews are pending before the Zoning Board of Appeals, and calendared for a public hearing and possible decision on August 22, 2002: A. Referral(s) under Site Plan Provisions: Appl. No. 5149 - ~ Suffolk S~yard, Project Description: Two boat rack structures Location of Property: 5775 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk 117-5-29.1 Appl. No. 5084 - 640 Church St. LLC/Chituk Pools Project Description: Pool Company with Indoor Storage Location of Property: 640 Church Lane, Cutchogue LIO Zone. Would you please forward comments or suggestions on the building layout or site issues that may be of concern to the Planning Board under the site plan or subdivision jurisdiction reviews. By way of a copy of this letter, we are also asking the applicants to contact your Department (765-1938) to determine if original maps, an application, or other documentation may be necessary for your department to commence this preliminary review. Please feel free to review the official ZBA file at any time that is convenient for your staff. Thank you. cc: New Suffolk Shipyard c/o Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 640 Church St. LLC c/o McCarthy Management, Inc. Soutflold Town Plannin BG rd ALEXANDER B7°55' E. 40,00' N/O/F MICHAEL I WITHERS ~.,, S. 87~55'00",E. . /57.56 8~'05'30. HOUSE ¥ ORCHARD StREEt N. 85'SS'40- W. PARKING CALCULAT/ONS MARINA I SPACE PER BOA T SLIP PARKING SPACES REOUIRED EXIS TING 58 SLIPS = = 58 SPACES 5 EMPLOYEES = 5 RETAIL SALES = 2 65 SPACES PROPOSED BOA T STORAGE RACKS STORAGE RACK "A"-= 2 TIFR .... = 21 BOA TS STORAGE RACK "B" = 5 x,3 TIER = 15 BOA?- ALONG EXISTING BLDG. = 36 BOA TS I SPACE FOR 2 BOATS = lB SPACES = BJ SPACES EXISTING SPACES = 83 AREA = 2.287 Acres to tie line's LOT COVERAGE EX~STING"Il, PROPOSE=5 ~ONS TRUC TION A T COMPLETION OF CONETR~ICTION ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION ,OF SECTION TEO~ OF THE NE~ YORK ~TATE EDUCATION LAW. EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7~OS - SUBDIVISION E. ALL CERTIFICATIONS HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IE SAD MAP OR COPIES SE~R THE~'~pRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR SUE VEY OF NEW SUFFOLK SHIPYARD A T NEW SUFFOLK TO WN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK C~OUNTY N K ~000- 117 .)5- 29.; Sca/e: I" =40' Dec. 13,1999 FEB, RE~ PO02 JAN. 8~ ZOOS (PARKINg) L/C, NO. 4961~ 'ES1.1 ¥ ( 631I 765 - 1797 P. O. BOX 909 12~0 TRAVELER STREET SOUTHOLD~ N.Y. 11971 94- 105 APPEALS' BOARD MEMBERS Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Gefird P. Goehringer George Hc,'cning ~ Ruth D. Oliva ....... Vinc~nt~?fiando BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 19, 2003 Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net Appl. No. 5149 - New Suffolk ~ Property Locatio~ ~ Suffolk Road, New Suffolk; 1000-117-5-29.1. SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's parcel is 2.287 acres in size with 264.07 feet along the east side of New Suffolk Road in New Suffolk. The property is managed as a boat yard and marina in a waterfront, boating community. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's March 27, 2002 Notice of Disapproval, citing Section 100- 121C1, in its denial of a building permit lo construct accessory open storage racks within the area zoned M-II, proposed at a height over the code's 18 ft. limitation and in an area other than a rear yard. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 20, 2003 and May 1, 2003 with written extended to May 15, 2003, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant's original request is shown on the Peconic Surveyors, P.C. map dated December 13, 1999, revised January 9, 2002, for two open storage racks, noted as follows: (1) rack 'A' at 14' wide x 76' long x 26' high with a location five (5) feet from the closest northerly property line, in between the existing metal/frame building lo the west and the shed to the east; and (2) rack B' of a s'ze 14' x 50', and proposed to be at a maximum height of 26 feet and will be located inside an open notch immediately abutting the existing 86.2' metal storage building, as shown on the plan prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. dated December 13, 1999, revised January 9, 2002. Rack "A" will have two storage tiers, and rack "B" will have three storage tiers. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: An an alternative, the applicants submitted a revised plan dated April 30, 2003, by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. The alternative plan shows an increased setback for storage rack "A" from 5 feet to 10 feet from the northerly property line; and includes a plan for a landscape buffer of screening between rack "A" and the northerly property line, as described below. The applicants also confirmed that they wish to withdraw their initial request for a height variance with respect to storage rack "A." REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: Page ~.- June 19, 2003 Appl. No. 5149 - New Suffolk Shipyard 117-5-29.1 at New Suffolk 1. A) Grant of alternative relief with respect to rack "A" will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Proposed storage rack "A" will not exceed the code's height limitation of 18 feet and will be ten (10) feet from the closest northerly property line. A landscape buffer will be provided and maintained in the northerly yard adjacent to the northerly house near rack "A". The buffer will consist of 12-14 ft. Eastern Cedar Trees and 6' high slated privacy chain-link fence. B) Grant of alternative relief with respect to rack "B" will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The maximum height of rack "B" will be 26 feet, and will be shielded in the requested location, within an open notch immediately adjacent and close to the existing 86.2' metal storage building. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The waterway and wetlands exist along the shorelines, and the applicant testified that the environmental agencies governing these sensitive environmental areas prefer a location that will not impact the waterways. Storage racks are common to all boat yards/shipyards and marinas in the Town of Southold. The only alternative to store the boats is on this type of open rack. 3. The relief granted is substantial relative to open storage rack "A" because it is a 50% reduction in the 20 ft. minimum setback requirement of the code. The relief granted is substantial relative to storage rack "B" because it is an 8 ft. increase in the 18 ft. maximum height limitation of the code pertaining to accessory structures. 4. The difficulty was self-created when applicant planned to locate the open storage racks. 5. Claims of excessive noise, air pollution, excessive traffic and have been submitted relative to the storage of boats on the proposed open racks. The Board finds no substantial evidence to suggest that the proposed two accessory storage racks will have an adverse impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The storage racks will be placed away from traffic areas and traffic circulation and will be placed where large boats have been stored. 6. Grant of alternative relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable applicants to enjoy the benefit of locating accessory storage racks, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. BOARD RESOLUTION: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, on motion by Member Orlando, seconded by Member Oliva, it was RESOLVED, to DENY the variances as applied, and to GRANT ALTERNATIVE RELIEF as follows: 1. Rack 'A' is limited to 18 feet in height to meet the code requirement and shall be a minimum distance of ten (10) feet from the northerly property line, as shown on the revised plan prepared April 30, 2003, by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. 2. Rack 'B' is limited to 26 feet height and shall be positioned in the area as requested and shown on the revised plan prepared April 30, 2003, by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. ?age 3 -June 19, 2003 ~pp'l. No. 5149 - New Suffolk Shipyard 117-5-29.1 at New Suffolk A screened, landscape buffer shall be planted and maintained between the northerly property line and proposed rack 'A', and a slatted privacy, chain-link fence in good condition north of the landscape buffer. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Tortora (Chairwoman), Horning, Oliva, and Orlando. Goehringer. This Resolution was duly adopted (4~ Lydi~Tortora, Ct~airwoman 8/27/03 Approved for Filing Nay: Member Sep 04 03 lO:~3a W~Z&am H. Raa? 40~.g~.O~~ P.~ RO0 & RACI , iNC. 1890 NORTH DIXIE HIGHWA y* BOCA RA TON. I~. 33432 * (~61) ~ ~7 · FAX (5E1) 89~-479E I I I TO ~'J'~d ~31-~I 1~ 9ELLBLBTBL 90:PT roGZ:/go/GB 2-3/4"xl-3 · 4325 BOLTS AND NUTS PER CONNECTION Z ~.. TIGHTEN X-BRC; lO SQUARE ~ RACK LATERAL STRUCI'RAL BRACII'~!G H BEAM X-BRC. LATERAL STRUCTRAL BRACING H BEAM, GROUND TO BE LEVEL AND COMPACTED 'Minuteman Boat. Handling Equipment Inc. Plymouth, MA S. 87'55' 40. 00' N/O/F MICHAEL J. WITHERS ~.,, So 8T'55'00' £. 157.56' $CHOoz AREA = 2287Acres to tie line's LOT COVERAGE EXIST~VG = 1174 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ~ T COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION ?209 OF THE HEW YORK STATE EDITION LAW. E. XC~PT AS PER SECTION 7909 - SUBOIVISION 2. ALL CERTIFICATIONS H~ON ARE VALIO FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF' ~ MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE ~MPRESSED SEAL 0~' THE SURVEYOR ~ S~C~.NATURE AI~PE. ARS HER~Oht A'[!~J'"RONA/LY TO CO%~PLY WITH SAID LAW THE TERM 'ALTERED BY" MUST BE USED BY ANY AND ALL SURVEYORS UTILIZING A COPY SURVEY OF t NEW SUFFOLK SHIPYARD A T /VEW SUFFOLK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y. 1000 - 117- 05- 29. I Sca/e, 1"=40' ., Dec. 13, 1999 '. FEB. 22, 2002 Semon, Bruno To: C¢: Subject: Standish, Lauren; Kowalski, Linda Eplattemer, V ctor Scopaz, Va erie New Suffolk Shipyard Hi Departments, In reference to the proposed work at: New Suffolk Shipyard 5775 New Suffolk Road New Suffolk, N.Y. SCTM: 1000-97-5-4.5 This email is for information only and is to keep all padies up to date. The following is scheduled: Trustee's Public Hearing for March 18, 2003 on or about 7:15pm Zoning Board Hearing for March 20, 2003 on or about 2:00 pm At the Planning Board Work session held on March 10, 2003 the project was discussed and a memo went out to Z.B.A., attached is a copy of the P.B. memo. Please forward this email to all department personnel, boards members, trustee's and etc as required. If you have any questions or concerns, I can be contacted at 631-765-1938 x229. Thank You Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer New S.Shipyard.doc Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson MAR - 6 Southold Town Planning Board BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 785-1366 RECEIVED MAR 5 2003 OF HEARINGS ON WETLAND APPLICATIO$~olhold Town Clerlt NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HELD BY THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AT THE SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL, MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ON Tuesday March 18th , 2003 ON OR ABOUT 7:15 PM. ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE WETLAND ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN. NEW SUFFOLK SHIPYARD request a Wetland Permit to dry rack storage of 15' to 25' boats, three tier open system dry rack storage is preferred system in that boat bottoms do not have to be painted (environmentally better).Located: New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, NY SCTM#117-05-29.1 2. MARC RUBENSTEIN request a Wetland Permit to construct an addition, deck and terrace onto an existing single family dwelling and to construct an addition and porch on to an existing cottage. Located Madeline Avenue No # Fisher's Island, NY ., SCTM#6-7-7 7/ ']~. ALAN SCHLESINGER requests a Waiver to place 6-1/2 foot stockade fence within one hundred feet of waterfront. Located: 125 Mesrobian Drive, Laurel, NY SCTM#145-4-7 PATRICIA GILCHRIST JOSEPH MENCINO request a Wetland Permit to create a drivexvay entrance - parking area - installation of retaining wall with Pennsylvania .Fieldstone - landscape. Located: 15 Fourth Street, New Suffblk, NY SCTM#117-19-15 ERNEST H. SCHNEIDER request an Amendment to Permit #5474 setback for proposed 8'x45' second story deck w/5'x24' stairway & platform which will be located a minimum of 93' lai~dward of the tidal wetland boundary. Located: 915 Lakeside Drive North, Southold, NY SCTM#90-4-5&6 GLENN BEHR request a Wetland Pemfit for "as built house, patio, pool and sanitary" Located: Cedar Beach Road, Southold, NY SCTM#79-8-15,2 JACQUELINE BITTNER request a Wetland Permit & Coastal Erosion Permit to reconstruct timber bulkhead in kind/in place 320 +/- linear feet new 29+/- ft. return at northwest comer displacement of rocks place rocks for armor along seaward side of new bulkhead install new 6"x6" follower and new bolts 44 +/- new 12" round piles 6- 8' on center in place install new 3/4" galvanized tie rods, new ,a~':~tl~ SYP CCA pressure treated to 1 5 lbs/c f. backfill with approx. 20l),¢u.~'.a~s dlean from an upland source all hardware to be hot dipped galvanized - restore landscaping - filter fabric behind new timber sheathing. Located: 4305 Soundview Avenue, Peconic, NY SCTM#68-1 - 17.2& 17.3 8. NICHOLAS PACE request a Wetland Permit to resheath landward side of approximately 63 linear feet of existing timber bulkhead and backfill with approximately 15 cubic yards of clean sand fill to be trucked in from an upland source. Remove and replace existing walk/deck and posts landward of bulkhead Located: 1760 Reydon Drive, Southold, NY SCTM#80-3-13 DOREEN & KEVIN BARR request a Wetland Permit to excavate +/- 10' wide area of existing bulkhead and install tie rods and deadmen -- backfill with additional 25 cubic yards of clean sand fill to be trucked in from an upland source construct 4' timber walkway landward of bulkhead - remove existing 4.5'x 10' deck - construct 10'xl0' deck and construct +/- 10 linear feet of timber retaining wall landward of new deck. Located: 200 Basin Road, Southold, NY SCTM#81-1-20 10. DENNIS HENCItY request a Wetland Permit for landscape activity landward of existing bulkhead. Located 1325 Kimberly Lane, Southold, NY SCTM#70-13-20.8 11. JOHN & BARBARA SEVERINI request a Amendment to an existing Permit for a 6'x8' one story portico addition to the existing single t'mnily dwelling. Located: 585 Gull Pond Lane, Greenport, NY SCTM#35-4-28&27 12. RICHARD HEFFERNAN request a Wetland Perufit for in kind/in place replacement of 65-foot wood bulkhead and replace of existing steps. Located: 730 West Shore Drive, Southold, NY SCTM#80-1-48. t WILI,IAiM LOIS & B1NA COMES rCqLICSt5 kt \Vetland & Coastal tgrosion l)crmit for installation of approximately 330 l.f. rock revctment along the shoreline also Wetland Permit ~br clean up of debris within 100 feet of HWM. Located 57875 & 58105 North Road, Greenport, NY SCTM#88-2-8&9 14. DONALD W. SUTER requests a Wetland Permit to add extension to existing framed garage existing concrete driveway to be removed and replaced with pervious stone proposed to build an addition to thc norlhern side of'existing single story house as well as enclosing existing screened porch - approx. 100 c.y. o1' till from an upland source will be utilized - proposed additions will still maintain lot coverage percentage under 20% Located: Dean Drive, Cutchogue, NY SCTM#116- 5-14.9 ALL PERSONS INTERESTED 1N SA/D MATTERS SHOULD APPEAR AT THE TIME AND PLACE ABOVE SPECIFIED AND WILL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD APPLICATIONS MAY BE REVIEWED AND COMMENTS MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING UP TO 24 HOURS PR/OR TO THE HEARING Dated: March 3, 2003 Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees By: Charlotte J. Cunningham, Clerk PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, THURSDAY, March 6th, 2003 AND FORWARD ONE AFFDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., PRESIDENT, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN HALL, MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NY 11971. Copies to: Suffolk Times Bulletin Board CAC Betty Neville - Town Clerk PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ChErman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To~ From: Re: Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman, Zoning Board of Appeals Bennet Orlowski Jr., Chairman, Planning Board New Suffolk Shipyard Application # 5149 SCTM: 1000-117-05-29.1 Date: March 11,2003 The Planning Board reviewed this matter at its Work Session on March 10,2003, and offers the following comments: The applicant proposes two boat storage racks, 26 ft in height, and located in the side yard at less than the required 20' setback. The storage rack on the southerly side of the property is located in close proximity to the existing building, and will not be intrusive. The second storage rack, along the northerly property line, and setback 5 feet, will be landscaped by the applicant. This appears adequate, in l{ght of the actual uses occurring on the abutting property. The Planning Board further reviewed the proposed site plan, the landscaping plan, and the applicant's description of the proposed operation with the applicant and his Attorney. The Planning Board reviewed the availability of adequate parking (83 spaces) for both the current marina operation, and the additional boat storage racks, and feels that because of the seasonal usage of the boat racks, and the local nature of this marina where many customers walk to the facility, sufficient parking can be accommodated on site. Note was made of the area wide shortage of boat slips, and that storage racks of this type help alleviate this overall shortage. Such uses are now common to marinas in the area. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer George Homing Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando T__OWN M__EM_Q_O BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road EO. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (63~) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 7654809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net TO: Mr. Bennett Odowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning Board FROM: Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman, Zoning Board of DATE: March 6, 2003 SUBJECT: Req. uest for Comments Nh...,- ..... - ~w ourro,~ ~hipyard~.~7-5~,~ Vanance/Site Plan Application Reviews The above variance application (#5149) was submitted to our department, for which a March 20, 2003 public hearing has been scheduled. Your comments are requested concerning the site plan/zoning elements related to the proposed two boat rack structures. For your convenience, we attach a copy of the application. We understand that the applicant's attorney has submitted a site plan amended January 8, 2002 and landscape plan dated February 4, 2003 under the review process. By way of a copy of this letter, we are asking the applicant's attorney to contact your Department (765-1938) d rectly to determine whether or documentation or nformation has been submitted or may be necessary, not other The ZBA file is available for review at any time that is convenient for your department. Thank you. cc: PatnCia C. Moore, Esq. ZBA Members the dry storage provides alternative dockage to the community. The Boats are stored on the racks and placed in the water when requested. The system is beneficial to the environment, reduces the need for a marina's expansions of docks~ 3. The area variance is not substantial The application of the balancing test weighs in favor of the grant of the variance. The open rack is 28' in height which will adequately and safely support the boats. 4. The variance will have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The storage rack will relocate boats presently stored and docked in the Marina. The adjacent property rents their boat slips and therefore maintains a commercial use. 5.The alleged difficulty was not self-created. The Marina is M-II District which at a Marine boat storage is a customary and accessory use. The storage racks were proposed in the location where they will be least visible from New Suffolk Road and from the waterfront properties. 6. The variance requested is the minimum variance practicable given the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant. We respectfully request that the appeal be together with any further relief that is necessary and reasonable. granted, deemed FoP- ¢40. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. TO: NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Patricia Moore A/C New Suffolk Properties 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 DATE: March 2~ 2007 Please take notice that your application dated March~ 2002 For permit for construction of two sets pf accessory boat rack_s at Location of property: _5.775 New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section .117 Block5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: Lot 29.1 The ro osed Construction on a 99 672 s uare foot lot in the M-Il District, is not '- - . Article XII Section 100-121C I which states ermmea ursuant to "Accesso uses as set forth in and re atedb 100-31C 1 throu 7 oftheA 'cultural- Conservation District and sub'ect to the conditions of 100-33 thereof." wi:rich states "In the ~nsi ResidentialR-80 R-120 R-200 andR- 400 ~istricts accesso buildin s and structures or other accesso uses shall be located in the re tared rear ard sub'ect to the followin re uirements: "A. Suchbuildin s shall not exceed 18 feetinhei t"andB4 which states "On lots contamm ~n excess of seven -rune thousand nme hundred and nine -nine 79 999 s narc feet such bnildin s shall be set back no less than twen 20 feet from (~The first set of ro osed boat racks located on the northern side of the roe are noted as bein located in the side ard five feet from the side lot line and measure +/- 26 feet in hei bt. The second set of ro osed boat racks located on the southem ortionofthe ro en arenotedas bein located in the side ard and measure +/- 26 feet 'm hei t. ~']~uthorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review' by the Southold Town Building Department.Cc: File, ZBA I Fo~Office Use Only: Fee~. _jo~O~); "-¥" i~,,,~ , . ~./Asslgned No. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE oF B.,LD,NG ,.SPECTOR'S D.C,S,ON APPEALED: TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: I (We) New Suffolk Shipyard (Appellant} of .... . .................... (Tel # 734- 6311 ) HEREBY APPEAL THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED ,..3/.2-.~/.02, ......... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 3/11/02 FOR: (x) Permit fo Build ....................... ( ) Permit for Occupancy ( ) Permit fo Use ( ) Permit for As-Built ( ) Other: 1. Location of Property; ..... .5,77..5 ~e~..S..u..E.E..o..l.~,...~.o.~4,...~..e.~.~.E.~?~~ ................. Zo"" H-Tm Disfr, cf 1000 Section, ~ .1.7..... Block.?.... Lot(s}...2,?.: .[. ............... Current Owner., ~.e, .~. ,S.u~?..o~"~'~-'op erc±. 2. Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, S~¢flon, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordna,nce~by numbers. Donor quote the law.) Article .~..z.z.... Section 100- ,.1..2.1.. (~ S~b-Secttnn C (1) 3. Type of Appeal. Appeal is made herewith for: RECEIVED (×) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance or Zonlng Map ( ) A Variance due to lack of access as required by New York Town La,AY 1 0 ~a0z~ Chap. 62, Cons. Laws Art. 16, Section 280-A. ( ) Interpretation of Article .......... Section 100-. ................. ( ) Reversal or Other: .................................................................. ,.S.e.?.t.iLo] .Tgw ,Cler .... 4. Previous Appeal. A previous appeal (has) (has not) been made wffh respect to this property or with respect to this declslon of the Building Inspector (Appea # ...... Year ....... REASONS FOR APPEAL Additional sheets m be used with a Iicanf's sl nature: A~ REA VARIANCE REA$ON,~: (1) An undesirable change will not be produced In the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment fo nearby properties, If granted, because: see attached reasons (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant fo pursue, other than an area variance, because: (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: (4) The Variance will NOT have an adverse effect or Impact on the physical or environmental conditions In the neighborhood or district because: (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? ( ) Yes, or ( ) No. This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and af the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safely, and welfare of the communily. Swom-to~-~'6~ mj~ this. ~ A e ,-,- .anr..~:~_ uthori~ed Agent) ~'o~., 20~ ~ ' (~~"ella"~ ~ ~'c ~arv ~ ic ( g nf must submit ~~om ~wn~r) ZBA App OS/O0 ~1~ C, ~RE ~Su~lk ~ ~ No. ~61668 mm~i~ ~Ju~ 16~ Reason for Appeal Continued Zoning Board of Appeals re: New Suffolk Properties Pursuant to Town Law section 267b-3 the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals is to analyze and assess the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant against the potentially deleterious effects that a grant of the relief requested would have on the health, safety and welfare of the effected neighborhood or Community. In performing this balancing test, the Zoning Board is charged with the responsibility to consider the five factors enumerated in Town Law Section 267b-3(b). The variance should be granted for the following reasons: 1. No undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if the variance isgranted.The subject property is a marina with the accessory Storage of boats on the property. Additional boat Storage is requested with unenclosed '~Racks". The location of the boat Storage racks must be placed out of the way of vehicle and traffic circulation. The rack on the north side is to be located between two existing buildings and in the location where boats are presently stored. The second rack is to be located behind the metal storage building. The adjacent property (n/f Michael Withers) is a private marina and seasonal residence. The rack system will be located where large boats have been historically stored, the rack could be Screened with fence or planters, as the Planning Board or Zoning Board may direct. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant can not be achieved by Some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Boat storage racks enable the Marina to operate efficiently by locating the boats in a neat and orderly manner. A Marina's business operation relies on Boat storage to maintain the consequential boat repairs and service for their customers. Rack Storage enables the Marina to function and meet their customer, s expectations. In addition the demand for boat dockage exceeds the supply, New Suffolk Shipyard has a 75 person waiting list for dock space, N/OIF MICHAEL J. WITHERS 40.00' ~ SCHooz ORCHARD PARKING CALCULATIONS MARINA I SPACE PER BOAT SLIP PARKING SPACES REOUIRED EXISTING 58 SLIPS = 58 SPACES 5 EMPLOYEES = 5 RETAIL SALES = 65 SPACES PROPOSED BOA T STORAGE RACKS STORAGE RACK "A'~--- = ~1 BOA TS STORAGE RACK "B' = 5 x $ TfER -- /5 BOATS AL~ONG EXISTING BLDG. -- 36 BOA TS / SPACE FOR 2 BOATS = lB SPACES = 83 SPACES EX/STING SPACES -- 83 AREA = 2287 Acres to tie//neb LOT COVERAGE EXISTING = I1~ PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION A T COMPLETION OF CONSTR~CTION ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7~09 OF TH~ NEY/ YORK STA'T£ EDUCATION LAW. EXCEPT AS PER SECTON 7~09 - SUBDIVISION E. ALL CERTIFICATIONS HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF SURVEY OF NEW SUFFOLK SHIPYARD A T NEW SUFFOLK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000 - 117- O5- 29. I Scale, 1"=40' Dec. 13,~999 FEB. E2, 2002 ~IAN, S~ 200E 1PARKINg) FEB ~ 0 ~03 765 P. O. BOX I~$0 TRAVELER STREET SOUTHOLD~ N.Y. 11971 NO. 49618 765 - 1797 94- 105 N/O/F S. G & A. ALEXANDER N/O/F MICHAEL J. WITHERS 87'55' zo,~.. ~, ~.~' '~ 40.00' Da' _. KEY CUTHOGUE HARBOR ,.,..-...--~ ~ ,.. ,~,-..__ _, ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PARKING CAL CULA T/ONE ~ ~~~ ~,,, / ~~. . ~mN~ / S~c~ P~ ~0~ ~L/P ~ ~ ~ P~mN~ S~C~S ~OU/~EO ~'~' ~ RETAIL SALES ~ ~ ' ' . ~5 SPA CEE ,. ,' ~.: :,~ . ~ ~'~' ~, : ~. , . PROPOSED BOA T STORAGE RACKS ~., .5,'"; ~- ~ ' ' ~ ', /'~ -- = 21 BOATS ..~ · ,. , , STORAGE RACK "B" = ~ ~.3 ~tER = 15 BOATS (. ~ ~ b/~.~ , - , EX/STING SPACES - ~ ~h~ i N.~'O33o-w 195. '"' ORCHARD STREET ~UILDI~GS f CONCRETE PA VEMENT=Ie, 7~Tsq. ft. 127~7 0.17 I = 21~Z cu. ft. ' BLUESTONE AREA "= ~1~ 700sq. fL line . 700~0.1 7~0.~= 429~ cu. ft./~2.~ = 102 VF. ' AREA =' 2.287 Acres to tie ~'~ ~- ~ ¢~ ~ ~,o~ ~..~ ZONING DISTraCTS- M/ MI/ sURvEY OF , O T cO ,s ' . . NEW SUFFOLK SHIPYARD PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION · . _ ~ ~ ~ COUP~nON OF COnSTRUCTiON _ T~ ' . SUFFOLKCOUNTEP Y , 1000 117 05 29. 1 ' NEW SUFFOLK MARINA LLC &ANOSCAPEO AREA = 6000 ~ ~0~'. ~'~' - DeC,Sca/e:13,.,.19991" = S S V Y S VI L ON ' FEB. ~% 2002 ' ,' .. ~~~] ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THI UR E I A 0 ATI OF ~EcTION 7~09 OF THE NEW fORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. ~lV, ~ ~ ~av~/ EXCEPT AS eE~ S~CT~O~ 7~09 SUa~V~S~O~ ~. ALL CErTiFiCATiONS Mar. ~.200~ HE~EON A~ VAUD FO~ T~S MA~ A~ ~PL~S TH~qE_~.LE.__ S~ MAP OR 'COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED ~EAL OF THE 5UKV~YOK ~.~. e, ~o~/~,~,~ WHOSE SIGNATURE APP~RS H~EO~, · ' :- _ RVEYORS~ P.C.' ADDITIONALLY TO CO~LY WITH SAD LAW THE TERM'ALTERED BY" ' MUST BE USED BY ANY AND ALL SURVEYORS U~[~IZING A C~PY .OF ANOTHER_ _SURVEYOR'S- MAP. T~MS SUCH AS INSPECTED AND ~oO ZO~ BROUGHT TO DATE ARE NOT IN CO~LIANCE WITH THE LAW. SOUTHOLD~ N. % 119TI 94- 105 CODE QTY' SCIENTIFIC NANIE COi'.,1NION NAME SIZE P-.EMA~..K.5 , .... i ,, . JV' ~ .Junipor'u5 Virgini~n<2 E~5~.¢rn ~¢d Ccdcr IO - 12' B,~ B/He-,::2v~ i , r, · ,(O'~,Sk,letffTL'r' Ae~OV'E) "l'O ,,'F.INIC.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'~D,e~C,O~:;A5 IJ; ,, ,,,,, ,,,. ,' ,. ;;:,, ,, ' ' ~ , .'. . ',-',' '','''r. '~.' ~- .... ~"'" ". '~' i ' ' ~ , [ DE~IPTION OF ~O~ · ~d~NISH ALL LABO~ PLANT ~ATE~IAL5 ANO ALL OTHE~ MATE~IAL5 NEOESCAR~ FO~ THE , P~OPE~ INSTALLATION AN~ EST LI~H~BNT OP PLANTINGS, IN AOOO~PANOE ~ITH PLAN~ , , , ' , ,,. , ,: .......... , . , . , , ,' , , AND A6 OlREOTEO DY THE LANOSOAPE A~OHITEGT , OUALI~ INSURANCE: HEALTHY' 5PEE.,iI'-IEN6 C. APAi~LE OF VI¢O~-OU5 ~O~NTH , PLANT MATERIAL5 5HALL BE AVAILABLE AT AN~ T~E FO~ INSPECTION ~ LAND~OAPE A~OHITEOT. PELIVE~Y, 5TOWAGE, AN~ HANDLINg, 5[TE ~ITH TA~Pg, SUITABLE GOVE~ AN~ ~A~ ~EMOVE ALL PLANT5 ~ITH ~OOT ~ALL5 PA~A~EO BM O~OPPIN~ O~ ROLLIN¢, AND INSTALL PLANT HATERtAL5 ONLY ~HEN ~EATHER CONDITION5 A~E FAVO~ABL~ OR ~HEN MATERIALD HAVE BEEN HAROBNE~ OFF. ~, ' ~,['" ' ' ~" PLANT fN ACCOrdANCE ~ITH PLANTIN~ PETAIL DHO~N ON PLAN. PLAC.,E ANO PLUNtE~ IN PiT Y'41THOUT OAb4A~IN~ F2-OOT BALL ',,. , , PLANTIN~ HIX~: ~ ~ATTE~ (IE. ~LA55, PLAOTIC,ETO,) O~ HATERIAL TOXIC TO PLANT ~RO~TH. ~., ', , , .... ", · COMPOST 5HALL HAVE THE FOLLO~IN~ ~NI~U~ ~E~UI~EHENT¢ O~ P~OPE~TIE5: ~ , : , , PARTICLE ~IZE: < .----~L PLANTIN~ O~ AT THE ENO OF A pLANTIN~ ,' " ' '/ ' ~ ~'~ ' ' ' SUBSTANTIAL ~EASON. AN INSPECTION 5H~L BB OONOUOTE~,BM THE LA~5OAPE A~OHITEOT. 'UPON A ~U~ E~UAL TO IO% O~ THE TO~AL OO~T OF THE PLANTtN~ 5H~L BE ~ETAINE~ ·,I'"IAINTAIN ALL I"4ATE~IAL TO 5t, J~TAIN ~000, VI~OI~.OLI~ ®~O!~ITH. ,i ' , '; , . , , ........ , ,, , . '~',, , ,, j ,[ · ~Ef'4OVE ALL ~EA~ PLANT NIATE~IAL F~Oh4 51TE It~f-4E~IATEL¥. ' , , ' , , ' ,,, , .... ,, ,,,,,~'" , . ' ' ' DAHADED AS A ~E~LT OF TH~ ~LANTIN~ P~OOE~U~D. *, :' ' ' '" PLANT L BT 'i ' · Fd~NIPH ~L LAbOr, PLANT ~ATE~]AL& AND ALL OTHE~ ~ATE~IAL¢ NEOES~A~ FO~ THE ,. , , ,, , ,% , ,, ' --.. ~-'? . . ,, ~ P~OPER INSTALLATION AND EPTADLI~H~EN% OF PLANTIN¢5, IN ACCORDANCE ~ITH PLANE ' ' ' AND A~ DIRECTED ~Y TH~ LAND'GAPE ARCHITECT " ~ J HEALTH~ ~P~OI~N~ CAPABLE OP V~O~OU~ ~O~TH~ ~IZE · PROTEOT ALL PLANT~ F~OM ~ ~[OATION ~U~IN~ T~AN~PO~TATION AND PTO~APE ' 61TE ~ITH TARP6 9dlTADLE CO/ER AN~ HATE~ . ,, , ,,. , . , INSTALL PLANT ~ATE~IAL~ ~EATHER :' $ I ~LANT IN ACCORDANCE ~ITH PLANTIN~ DETAIL ~HO~N ON PLAN. ] ' ,,, . }:,,/ , .... ~ ,. ~ ~ OOHPOST 5HALL CONTAIN O~ANIC ~ATTE~ O~ MATERIAL OF A PENE~ALL~ NATURE CAPABLE OF 5UDTAININ¢ THE ~O~TH OF VEPETATION, ~ITH NO FO~EI~N ...... O~MPL~TION O PLANTIN~ PL*NTtN~ ' ' ' , ¢ REPLAC. E ANY' PLANT i'4ATEIRtAL AS SOON AS WEATNER CON~ITION~ PE~.I'*41T, , OF TH[[ ' ' ": , .5 · E~LIA~AN'P~E 5HALL AL~..O COVEF~ ~'.EPAIR O~ AN"ff PART ' i='~EI~I~ ' ' ' ' "'; " ' '.i .... " '" ' ":~" ~ ~F ~UTHOLD ~ ~ . . , '. . ,-N.~, I1~1 ' .... ¢ 2002 (~A~KIN~ ~' :"' "~' ' ' ' TED JAN . ,,, , ,.= ,. , , ,~ , ~Ng ' .2~,' ' '" ,, ;,,, ,,;' ,, MUST BE USED BY ANY AND ALL SURVEYORS UTI.,L, IZING A COPY OF ANOTHER SURVEYOR'S MAP. TERMS SUCH AS INSPECTED' AND 'BROUGHT-TO-DATE' ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH 'THE LAW. ADDITIONALLY TO COMPLY WITH SAID LAW THE TERM "ALTERED BY" ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7209- SUBDIVISION 2. ALL CERTIFICATIONS HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF SAID MAP OR 'COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR WHOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREO~ ORCHA RD S I't?EE T O WNER/A PPL/CA N T' NEW SUFFOLK MARINA LLC 6775 NEW SUFFOLK ROAD NEW SUFFOLK, N.Y. NOTES' AREA TO REMAIN NATURAL I0~t00 sq. fl. LANDSCAPED AREA = 6000 ~. fl. AREA = 2.287 Acres to tie/ines ZONING DIS TRIC TS- MI & MIl NEW SUFFOLK SHIPYARD ~ r c%~[~o~ o~ co~sr~ucno~ A T'-NEW SUFFOLK TO WN OF SOUTHOLD 13~ SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y 1000 - 117 - 05 - 29.1 Scale: 1" =r~' Dec, 13, .,.~999 FEB. 22, 2002 dAN. E~ 2003 (PAR;~ING? Mar. 8.2003 MAR. 21~ ~005 ( reviion ) APRIL 30~ 20(?3 rrevesions) Nov,. 5~ 2003' (RE'VISIONS) SURVEY OF FLL~oD ZO/VE DtEA /NA GE BUILD?NGS Z 12747~0.17~ I = 21~ cu. fL BLUESTONE AREA '= 41 ?00~0.17xO.~= 2127cu.71. 4294 cu./l. 4294 cu. fl./42.2 = 102 VF. PRO VIDE 26- 8'¢~ 4 Deep, or LIGHTING (exish'ng) ~ = FLOOD LIGHT · = AREA LIGHT CFTI TERIA CONCRETE PA VEMENT=I2~ ?~ ?sg. fL 41,700sq. ft. equol ~RVEYORS~ P.C. (6312 765 -50~0 FAX ( 631) 765 - 1797 ,P. O. BOX 909 1230TRAVELER STREET SOUTHOLD~ N. Y. 11971 94- 105 ; ,~¢ d , '~ ~ ~',,,~ PARKING CALCULATIONS z~. ~ ,I~'-~' ~' -' ) ' MARINA I SPACE PER BOA T SLIP ' Y~ ~¢ ~ . ';", ~ ~ ~:' PARKING SPACES REQUIRED ::~ -~ ~ ,,~ O~ EX/STING'- ~ ~:,,:~/ ~ ~ :: ,,,~,,~ 585 EMPLSLIPSo YEES = == 585 SPACES RETA& SALES = 2 ~~ _ ~ ~ . .~ ,' ', ~0 ~-~ ,~ = ~1 BOATS _ ' ~ -r' - ' ~ '- f ' ' Y~ . - '' ' ' . '- ,- ~. . ~ ,' , ~ , .-. ~, , : ~:~1 ~ ~-~ ~ '~~ °~ ' v~ STORAGE ~ACK "B" = S x.~ -' ' ''' "' ' """ ' ::~ :~~:~ ~~~~~~ .. '. ~~, ALON~ EXISTING BLDg. ~~ .- ~/~ ' ' ' ' ~ '- '' ~'-'~ ', / ~ .... = 36 BOATS ~or~ ' ~.~ / ~ ' _= 8~ SPACES . NIO/F /N/O/FS, G,~-A. ALEXANDER 87'55' E, 40.00' MICHAEL J. WITHERS S. 87'55'00' E. SC/'/Ooz ttOUs£ AREA = 2287Acres to tie lines SURVEY OF NEW SUFFOLK SHIPYARD A T NEW SUFFOLK TO WN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. 1000 - 117 - 05 - 291 Scale: 1" =40' Feb. 14, 1994 April 26~199~t LOry Wells~ M.H.~Y.M.) Prepored in =ccord=nce wi/h /he minimum stond~rds for lille surveys us esto~lJshed by the L.I.A.L,S. ond upproved end udopfed for such use by The New York Slole Loud Title Associotion. (516i 765 - 5020 P. 0. BOX 909 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD~ N. Y. M Y.S. LIC. NO. 11971 94- 105