Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-115.-3-9 (2) ~ I SITE PUN Presub mission conference (within 30 days of written request) Complete application received (within 4 months of presub. conference) Application reviewed at work session (within 10 days of receipt) 1-:2"$-7;.. 1'WTlr.:=l ~.~ 1~~l:L~ 2: o Applicant advised of necessary revisions (within 30 days of reviclv) ~ I "J J ~ ,,' Revised submission received 1'WTlr.:=l ~~ 1'WTlfQi{l ~~ Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination s!/\ t CrrT{ ~ -'1.:.1..... ~p.,.. /-;,/-If92 I <:) <:) <:) REFERRED TO: " - "" zl- o~ Cl UJ I- ~ U o ,...J I- --::UJ '-" l>::u., 12UJ .~ ~--x: z;::J <cO ....lVl ll. l<.l i- Zoning Board of Appeals (written comments within 60 days of request) Board of Trustees ~&i f'ZO'Llr;;;:-J ~~ 11", II") - :r:: % i- _ 0uilding Department (certification) . Suffolk County Department of Planning Department of Transportation -State Department of Transportation - County Suffolk County Dept. of Health ..........-Fire Commissioners ~ fWUr;:;;:;-]r:::::J ~~eJ 1'WTlr;;;:-J ~~ r;amfOKl ~~ f'OO'llfQi{l ~~ Sent: NO Received' RECEIVED: Draft Covenants and Restrictions ~~ "ro. OK Filed Covenants and Restrictions Landscape plan ~~ "ro. OK Lighting plan ~~ "ro. OK Curb Cut apprOval ~@ "ro. OK Health approval ~~ _ Him. OK I Drainage plan ~~ / '!ro. OK Reviewed by Engineer ~@' '!ro. OK Approval of site plan' -with conditions Endorsement of site plan .. " ... '.,'- .r.. Certificate of Occupancy inspection ~EJ "ro. OK .., .1., /~... One year review 1=1/ r;;;;-} \1" .; - .:5tl.eFic.e 1f!K./ ~ MOORE & MOORE Attorneys at Law 315 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 William D. Moore Patricia C. Moore Tel: (516) 298-5674 Fax: (516) 298-5664 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary Thomas F. Moore Of Counsel July 22, 1992 BY HAND Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Tartan oil site plan / Mattituck SCTM # 1000-115-3-9 Dear Members of the Board: Enclosed please find five prints of the above referenced site plan. WDM/mr Encls. rn rn@~OW~ 00 JUL 2 3 1992 SOUTHOlD TOWN PlANNING BOARD -. 6-ID-73 f"II,,_Lot{ j)"Rltrl OE OF fG-il?.aL:.I<I"I /I sSoC. CAueo 1!-r1TfO TO t<'rid"- l/z, PRAlrl.fl.,s € ,!/1t> ~ (JL r"tI... ~t1rtl?J! !;;re--- r IIYf"".~~ nt j( - 00 (.ff/iP~ r#~1 rpc &I'ITf~E (SIT-If r17 u s r t1 II (rt~J-'1 OFf) //"1' Trf~ C~LC'" "-#r/~'YS. t?<. . . SubFiu.f 18 t2tL I MOORE & MOORE Attorneys at Law 315 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 William D. Moore Patricia C. Moore Tel: (516) 298-5674 Fax: (516) 298-5664 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary Thomas F. Moore Of Counsel June 29, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Bob Kassner Re: Tartan oil / Mattituck Dear Bob: Enclosed please find the Long Environmental Assessment Form for the Tartan oil / Mattituck site plan application before your Board. The review fee, as you are aware, has been paid previously. Please advise if there is any additional information you require to proceed with the site plan review. yours, WDM/mr Enc. cc: Tartan Oil Corp. 00 rE&rnOwrn m 1I.-219Q2 ! S0umoLO TOWN ... ROARD , STATE WJI~ I'IY RE\lID\' - FULL ') , \1,1 i'; \1) I_'J Purpose: 'I11e full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies det manner, whether a project or action rray be significant. 'lbe question 0 rray be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there project that are subjective or imreasurable. It is also understood tha mine significance rray have little or no formal Jcnowledge of the enviro nically expert in enviromental analysis. In addition, rrany woo have "led AJi)aN()f!ilA ticular area rray not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the ques wn of signifi- cance . 'I11e full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, canprehensivE' in nature, yet flexiblE' to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Catponents: The full EAF is canprisro of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in thE' analysis that takes place in Parts II and III. Part II: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that rray occur fran a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered snall to rroderate or whether it is a potentially large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part III: If any impact in Part II is identified as potf>J1tially large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DE'I'E>>ITNATICN OF SIGITFIC1IN:E - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify portions of EAF canpleted for this project: CJ Part I D Part II CJ Part III Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropri- ate) and any other supp:>rting information, and considering both the Magnitude and im- portance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lE'ad agency that: c::J A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, there- fore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a negative declaration will be prepared. c:J 13. Although the project could have a significant effect on the enviroment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required; therefore, a ccmITIamJ negative declaration will be prepared. * c:::J C. The project rray result in one or Il'Ore large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the enviroment; therefore, a positive dec- laration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions. Name of Action: Name of LE'ad Agency: Print/Type Name of Officer in Lead Agency: Date: Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer aARr 1 - PJnm:'T INFO~IOO . Prepared by Project S[.onsor NC1l'ICE: 'nlis docm'ent is designed to assist in determining whether the action pr0- posed may have a significant eff€'Ct on the environment. Please ccrnplete the entire fOIIll, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the awlica- tion for approval and may be subject to further verification and p.lblic review. Provide any additional infoII!lation you believe will be needed to ccrnplete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that ccrnpletian of the full EAF will be dependent on information cur- rently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If informa- tion requiring such additional work is unavailable, 50 indicate and specify each instance. KINDLY ANSWER ALL QUESTIrn5; IF 00 ror APPLY, RESPCND 'N/A' NAME OF ACTIOO: Mobil Service Station ~OO OF ACTIQN: Rt. 25 & Marratooka Lane. Mattituck. NY NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT/SPCNSOR: Tartan Oil Corp. BUS. PHONE: 516-420-8080 SUFFOLK axJNTY 'I2'J( IDEm'IFICATIrn NlJoffiER: Sec: 115, B: 3, Lot: 9 DESCRIPl'Irn OF ACTIrn: Proposed hwy curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks ---------------- ---- PLEASE CCMPLE'I'E EACH QUESTION - INDICATE N/A IF NOT APPLICABLE: A. SITE DESCRIPTION: Physical setting of overall project, both developed and unceveloped areas. 1. Present land use: LJ Urban / -] Industrial It; Carrrercial / J Residential SUburban I / Rural (non-farm) I ~Forest / J Agriculture r-y Other (Specify) 2. Total acreage of project area: o acres 0.260acres AF'!'ER <XWLETIOO o acres ~O _acres APPOOXIMATE ACREAGE: Meadow or Old Field (Non-agriculture) Forested Agricultural {Includes orchards, pasture Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of EX:L) Water Surface Area PRESENrLY etc. ) o acres o acres o a=es o o o 0.520 acres o acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) 3. What is predaninant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: Well drained % of site M:>derately well drained 100 % of site Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil within soil group I through 4 of the NYS land Classification N/A acres. (See I NYCRR 370) (1). - 1 Il-acres acres o .52 c1_ a=es acres are classified Systffil? (1) 5. Are there bedrock ArowingS on project site? a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~ 0-10\ 10-15\ 15\ or greater Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a roilding, site or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? [ ~J YES ~ YES CD N:) 4. 6. 7. r XI N:) Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Landrrarks? C I YES {Sj NO What is the depth of the water table? 25+ (in feet) Is site located over a prilllary, principal, or sole source aquifer CX]YES I l~ jNO 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently e~ist in the project area? r 7 YES r xl NO 8. 9. 11. a. IDes project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identi- fied as threatened or endangered? I] YFS ! YJ NO Identi:y each species: b. What wildlife species have been confinned or \;Quld be expected to occur on site? None c. Do any rare, protected or species of special concern use tl1is site? None d. Are tl1ere any rare or protected plants or Ul"'ique plant crn1l1UI1ites present on site? None 12. Are there any unique or unusual land dunes, other geological formations) fonns on the project site? (Le. cliffs, ~ YES C:jJ NO DESCRIBE: D. Is tl1e project site presently used by tl1e crn1l1UI1ity or neighborhocd as an open space or recreation area? I 7 YES I --xl NO If YES, EXPIAIN 14. Does tl1e present site include scenic views known to be important to the ccmnu nity? C-I YES QI NO 15. Streams witl1in or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and narre of River to which it is trililtary: 16. Name of any Creek, Embayment or Harbor witl1in or contiguous to project area: a. Name: NIA b. Size (In Acres) c. Widtl1 at project site: d. Waterbody to which it is tributary: 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? L]7 YES ~1 NO a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow cormection? Ix j YES f~J NO b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow comection? r-f YES I x:j NO (2) Is the site located. or substantially =ntiguous Jl Critical Envirormental Area designated r;m-suant to Article B of the EO.,and 6 NYCPR 617? c:JYES .!KJ fol) Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? CJYES .G:J fol) CJ ~ 13. PRO:1D:T DESCRIPTIOO: IS. 19. 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 0 b. Project acreage to be developed: N/A acres initially; N/A acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to ranain undeveloped 0.260 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed !iilL%; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 8 proposed 8 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~ (upon CCIllpletion of project)? h. If residential: Nunber and type of housing units: One Family ThD Family Multiple Family Condaninium Initially: ffitiroately: i. Dimensions (ft) of largest proposed structure ~ _width; Lgth j. Lin Ft of frontage along public thorough::are project will occupy is? 544 2. Haw much natural material (Le. rock, f'arth, etc.) will be rerroved fran the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbPd areas be reclaimed? r-J YES 1-.7 fol) Ix 7 N/A a. If YES, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamaticn? ~ YES r_7 NO N/A c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? L=.7 YES !~ fol) N/A 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be reroved fran site? o acres 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-irrp::Jrtant vegeta- tion be raroved by this project? CJ YES !XJ fol) c:J N/A 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 1 IlOnths, (in- cluding demolition) . 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (mnnber) . b. Expected date of ccmnencerrent phase 1 (incl. demolition) 9/92 c. Approximate CCIllpletion date of final phase N/A IlOnth year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? CJ YES L~ NO N/A 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ~ YES !KJ fol) r=J N/A 9. No. of jobs generated: during construction 3 ; after project canpleted 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project n (3) 12. , Will project requ~location of any projects or Wlities? LJ YES If YES, explain Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? c:J YES ex; 00 a. If YES, indicate type of waste (sewage, industria 1, etc.) and arrol.D1t CIl 00 , fl. b. Name of water body intD which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? CJ YES en 00 Type 14. will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? CJ YES c:J 00 N!A Explain: 15. 16. Is project or any thereof located in a 100 year flood plain? 0 YFB m NO Will the project generate solid waste? CJ YES {EJ NO a. If YES, what is the arrount per mJnth? tons b. If YES, will an existing solid waste facility be used? r~ YES l.-J 00 c. If YES, give name ;Location: d. Will any wastes not go intD a sewage disposal system or intD a sanitary land- fill? CJ YES CJ NO; If yes, please explain: will the project involve the dispo!<al of solid waste? CJ YES a. If YES, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If YES, what is the anticipated site life? years. will project use herbicides or pesticides? CJ YES. LX] NO will project routinely produce odors (mJre than 1 hour/day)? c:J YES [~NO Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? CJ YES tp NO Will project result in an increase in energy use? Cl YES ill NO If YES, indicate Types: If water supply is fran wells, indicate pumping capacity: N!A gallons/minute. Total anticipated water u!<age per day: N!A gallons/day. Does project involve Local, State or Federal 5.mding? 0 YES If YES, please EXPLAIN: Approvals Required: L3 NO 17. tons /mJnth 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. . [KJ NO 25. Type SuI:rni tta 1 Date Town, Village Board Town, Village Planning Board Town Zoning Board County Health Department Local Agencies Regional Agencies Federal Agencies Other Agencies c:JYES CiJYES c::lYES CJYES c:JYES !XJYE..c, CJYES CJYES G;1NO c:JOO [yJOO liJOO a:JOO c::JOO [DOO lIJOO ~T'T'F. PTaN 12/110 NYSDOT Hwy Permit to be submittE (4) S;. ,.ZGiffii; AND PLANNING ~ .' 1. Does proposed actiJll"'involve a planning or If YES, indicate decision required: CJ ZOning J\rrendrrent L:J ZOning Variance CJ Special Use Pennit o Subdivision CE Site plan CJ New/Revision of Land Use Plan CJ Resource Management Plan CJ Other What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? What is the maximum potential developnent of the site if developed as pennitted by the present zoning? As existing What is the proPOSED zoning of the site? S"mp What is the maximum potential developnent of the site if developed as pennitted by the proposed zoning? As existin9 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recarrnended uses in adopted or recan- mended local land use plans? lD YES CJ NO 7. What are the predOl'inant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/4 mile . zoning decision? !KJ YES r:J 00 2. 3. Business 4. 5. radius of proposed action? Residential 8. Is the proposed action carpatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/4 mile? en YES CJ 00 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. ..'hat is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(sl for the formation of sewer or water districts? CJ YES L3 NO 11. Wi 11 the proposed action create a significant demand for any carmuni ty provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? L:J YES lEJ NO a. If YES,is existing capacity adequate to handle projected demand? DYES 000 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? L:J YES rII NO; If YES, are existinq roads adequate to handle the additional traffic? L:J YES CJ 00 D. INFORMATICNAL DE:I'AIIB Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. VERIFICATION: I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my mowl- edge. Louis DeRonde Name of Zt/Spons~ Signature ~ tl wi. ~ - -- If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a State agency, Coastal Assessrrent FODll before proceeding with this assessrnPJlt. Date: 6/16/92 Title Agent 4~-/ ~ canplete the (5) - William D. Moore Patricia C. Moore Thomas F. Moore Of Counsel Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 4 J/LI;Fil-G" itG MOORE & MOORE Attorneys at Law 315 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 Tel: (516) 298-5674 Fax: (516) 298-5664 Attention: Mr. Bob Kassner Dear Mr. Kassner: Re: Tartan oil As per our telephone conversation, oil Corp. check no. 2281 in the environmental form. jmr Ene. Margaret Rutkowski Secretary June 8, 1992 ch-J: ;:.. ~ enclosed please find Tartan sum of $400.00 for the Very truly yours, ~c8.ter~~ ~~ Moore & Moore By: Margaret Rutkowski l,;.. Wmlt8W J~r~~ ~---' ~ \ _ _ .....wIYG, BDAIID .. 46 PLAN~ING BOARD MEMBERS Bennet,t Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards scon L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box I 179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 May 19, 1992 William D. Moore Attorneys at Law 315 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: TARTAN Oil Site Plan Southwest corner of State Rte. 25 and Sunset Avenue, Mattituck Zoning District: Limited Business SCTMti 1000-115-3-9 Dear Mr. Moore: The Planning Board has received the enclosed traffic evaluation analysis from their environmental consultants. The Board accepts the recommendations of two curb cuts on State Route 25, and one each on Sunset Avenue and Marratooka Avenue. The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $400.00 from their environmental consultant for review of Part I and Part II of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. This fee must be paid in full by your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee and the Long Environmental Form, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. , . If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ;;3:/1-1/ n&-ct &tbr~.: ,:::l/ /-_ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. /j7v, v~ Chairman . CRAMER, V~ A:OCIATES ENVIRONMEN~G CONSULTANTS I . ,:XtLrILIf May 6, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 rn rn@rnolYlrn m MAY I I . rw TOWN NING BOARD Re: Review of Traffic Evaluation Tartan Oil, NYS Route 25, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-115-3-9 Dear Benny: As per your authorization, we have completed a review of the Traffic evaluation prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates for the above captioned application. The project review was conducted with particular focus on the applicant's request to provide two curb cuts along its frontage on Main Road (NYS Route 25). The followlng comments pertain to the site, and the information submitted, followed by a conclusion as to the appropriateness of the proposed access and circulation scheme. Existing access to the site is presently uncontrolled along the entire frontage of Main Road with the exception of removable signage which sometimes restricts access directly north of the pump Island. Main Road serves as the principal access to the site; however, the site may also be accessed by Sunset Avenue and Marratooka Lane. These secondary access points are also not channehzed with formal curb cuts. As noted in the Dunn Engineering report, the sight distance at all access points is excellent, exceeding the minimum stopping sight distances recommended by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (A Policy on Geometric Design on Highways and Streets, AASHTO, 1990). It should be noted that some foliage pruning is required on Sunset Avenue in order to meet and exceed the AASHTO recommended rrnnimum stopping sight distance. An examination of the accident history at the intersections of Main Road/Sunset Avenue and Main Road/Marratooka Lane revealed a low incidence of traffic accidents. The accident frequency for the three year period from 1987 to 1989 consisted of two reportable accidents and one nonreportable accident. Although the accident rate was not expressed in the customary terms of the number of accidents per million vehicle-miles of travel, three accidents over a three year period is well below the number of accidents that would warrant a "High Accident Location" status for an intersection on the New York State Department of Transportation highway system. Observations of the site as presently configured revealed no operational problems and internal and external circulation functioned well. The addition of a canopy over the pump dispenser island is not expected to adversely affect operations or internal circulation. A canopy would serve to provide a better focus to the site in addition to the usual benefits a canopy provides to patrons using the gas pumps (i.e. weather protection). Page 1 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 . . Tartan Oil Traffic Review In addition to the canopy, the applicant proposes to create two curb cuts along Main Road and one formal curb cut each on Sunset Avenue (30 feet south of Main Road), and on Marratooka Lane (50 feet south of Main Road). Clearly, the curb cuts on the side streets would benefit operations by more orderly control of the flow of traffic ingressing and egressing the site from the side streets. Curb cuts on the side roads would also reduce the number of conflict points with pedestrian and motor vehicle traffic along Sunset Avenue and Marratooka Lane. The question regarding the number of curb cuts on Main Road is one that requires assessment of the specific site conditions and circulation operations. Consideration should be given to the geometrics, observation of current operations, adjacent and nearby land uses, site layout and traffic circulation. The site appears to function well in its present condition. The excellent sight distances are a contributIng factor and the low accident frequency is a confirmation of good operation in the vicinity of the NYS Route 25/Marratooka Lane intersection. The relatively close proximity of the pump island to Main Road lends itself to a "flow-through" operation which would be facilitated by two curb cuts. The proximity of the pump island to Main Road also reduces the queuinll area for inllress and egress creating conflicts that could degrade circulation. Such conflIcts could spIll out onto Main Road creating delays and hazardous conditions. The presence of a convenience store on site in addition to the ,gas pumps will generate additional internal circulation patterns within the site. The Internal traffic flow permitted by two curb cuts on Main Road would become more significant in consideration of these additional internal circulation needs. The curb cuts on the two side streets will complement the Main Road curb cuts to help separate the internal flows and will serve local traffic from Sunset Avenue and Marratooka Lane thereby eliminating additional movements onto NYS Route 25 in order for trips originating from these two streets. If the presently uncontrolled site access were reduced to only one curb cut on Main Road, this would result in a number of vehicles diverted to the secondary accesses on the side streets (Marratooka and Sunset Lane). Traffic so diverted to the side streets could increase the number of potential conflicts. This could in turn increase accident potential with pedestrians and local traffic as well as add to the overall delay of traffic tryIng to gain access to Main Road from Sunset Avenue and Marratooka Lane. We are in agreement that the alternate flow through traffic scenario utilizing one curb cut to Route 25, and one curb cut to Marratooka, could result in a dangerous queuing situation as vehicles await gaps along Route 25 from the Marratooka Lane side street. In summary, the traffic access scenario proposed by the applicant appears to be sound with respect to traffic operations with no negative impact. Proposed improvements to the site will enhance operations and improve safety due to the presently uncontrolled site access scheme. It is recommended that two curb cuts on Main Road be allowed in this particular case due to the site specific conditions of existing site layout and operations, specifically internal/external circulation, separate traffic flows for the on-site convenience store, and the desire to minimize side street conflicts. CRAMER,V ENVIRONMENT SOCIATES G CONSULTANTS Page 2 , . . Tartan Oil Traffic Review Thank you for the opportunity to provide the Board with this input. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questIons. SOCIATES G CONSULTANTS Page 3 .. , Dunn Engineering Asl:iates Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 516-288-2480 ,,' . December 5, 1991 Mr. Allan Leon Tartan Oil Company 532 Broadhollow Road P.O. Box 1017 Melville, New York 11747 RE: Traffic Engineering Examination Mobil Gas Station Route 25 Mattituck Town of Southold, New York Dear Mr. Leon: In accordance with the requests by Mr. Bill Moore, Esq. and you, Dunn Engineering Associates has completed a professional traffic engineering examination of the Mobil Gas Station and convenience food store on the south side of Route 25 between Sunset Avenue and Marratooka Lane in Mattituck, Town of Southold, New York. The major aspects of our examination included: a) a review of the existing access in relation to the internal and external traffic flows as well as sight distances and accident records, b) the improved access to the site as proposed by Tartan Oil Corporation in relation to expected internal and external traffic flows, c) the access to the site as suggested by the Town of South old Planning Department in relation to expected internal and external traffic flows, and d) necessary improvements to enhance the traffic flow. These aspects are discussed in the following paragraphs of this letter report. Review of Existinl1 Access. Sil1ht Distance. and Accident Records With the exception of a short section of curb located on the southwest corner radius of Marratooka Lane and Route 25 (Main Road), the site is uncurbed along the entire frontage on the south side of Route 25. Therefore, access can be obtained to the site at any point along Route 25. Entering and exiting traffic presently use the entire frontage to access the site. In addition, no curbs exist along the site frontage on the west side of Marratooka Lane, and access is obtained by entering and exiting the site at any point along the site frontage on Marratooka Lane. The site frontage along the east side of Sunset Avenue is uncurbed between the south side of Route 25 and a tree line which covers a portion of the site frontage along the east side of Sunset Avenue. Thus, access to the site is obtained at any point along the east side of Sunset Avenue between Route 25 and the existing tree line. . , . . Mr. Allan Leon December 5, 1991 Page 2 Our review of sight distances indicated that available sight distance is good at all points along the site frontage on Route 25. This available sight distance along Route 25 ranges from 900 feet to the east and over 1000 feet to the west at the easterly end of the site on Route 25. At the westerly end of the site on Route 25, the sight distance available to the east is 800 feet and 750 feet to the west. Sight distances range between these values at other points along the uncurbed site frontage on Route 25. At the intersection of Marratooka Lane and Route 25 good sight distance exists to both the east and the west with a sight distance of 900 feet to the east and 1000 feet to the west along Route 25. Sight distance is also good along Marratooka Lane to the south from the easterly side of the site where available sight distance is 600 feet. Furthermore at the intersection of Sunset Avenue and Route 25 good sight distance also exists to both the east and west with a sight distance of 800 feet to the east and 750 feet to the west along Route 25. Sight distance to the south on Sunset Avenue from the west side of the site is somewhat restricted by brush and tree branches growing out over the edge of pavement to the south. However, this sight distance would be improved to 500 feet or more by minor pruning. Based on accepted sight distance standards, the stopping sight distance required at Route 25 based on a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour is 400 feet. Furthermore, the stopping sight distance required on Marratooka Lane and Sunset Avenue is 350 feet based on a posted area speed limit of 35 miles per hour. Therefore, the existing available sight distances at Route 25 and Marratooka Lane, Route 25 and Sunset Avenue and across the Route 25 site frontage are excellent based upon minimum stopping sight distances. Also, sight distances on Marratooka Lane to the south from the easterly site frontage is excellent based on minimum stopping sight distances. The improvable sight distance to the south on Sunset Avenue would exceed minimum stopping sight distance values after some pruning was accomplished. Accident data was obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation on all the accidents that have occurred in the vicinity of the site over the three year period of 1987 through 1989. This accident information revealed that over the three year period, one reportable accident occurred in 1987 at Route 25 and Sunset Avenue. At the intersection of Route 25 and Marratooka Lane, over the three year period, one reportable accident occurred in 1987 and one classified as a non reportable accident occurred in 1988. No accidents were reported on Route 25 along the site frontage between Marratooka Lane and Sunset Avenue during the three year period. Non reportable accidents are those accidents that are not required to be reported to the Department of Motor Vehicles. A review of this data revealed that these intersections are not considered as high accident locations. Furthermore, this data revealed there is no serious traffic safety problems in the vicinity of the site. This accident information is particularly significant in view of the fact that in times of heavy uninterrupted traffic flow on Route 25, it becomes difficult to make turns out of Marratooka Lane and Sunset Avenue, particularly in the summer. . . Mr. Allan Leon December 5, 1991 Page 3 Our observations of existing conditions revealed that there are no major problems with the internal or external traffic flows at the site. However some recommended modifications regarding access to the site are contained in a following section of this letter. These modifications are intended to enhance both the internal site circulation and minimize potential external traffic flow problems. Review of Access As Proposed bv Tartan Oil Company The access configuration as proposed by Tartan Oil Corporation in their revised site plan of November 20, 1991 would alter the site frontage along the south side of Route 25 to provide raised continuous curbing with two separate driveway openings for access to and from the site on Route 25. The westerly access point would be 30 feet wide and would be located approximately 25 feet east of Sunset Avenue. This access drive would allow left and right turns into the site and left and right turns out of the site onto Route 25. Another 30 foot wide easterly access drive would be located on Route 25 approximately 35 feet west of Marratooka Lane. This access drive would allow left and right turns into the site and left and right turns out of the site onto Route 25. This access plan, on the easterly side of the site would provide a raised curb extending 125 feet south of Route 25. Site access would be provided by a 25 foot wide drive on the west side of Marratooka Lane and would be located 50 feet south of Route 25. This access drive would permit right and left turns out of the site and left and right turns into the site. Along the westerly side of the site, on the east side of Sunset Avenue a raised curb extending 70 feet south of Route 25 would be provided. Site access on Sunset Avenue would be by a 25 foot drive located 30 feet south of Route 25. The curb and access drive have been located to afford the least adverse impact on an established tree line on the east side of Sunset Avenue. The location of the drive also is suited to reduce potential internal traffic conflicts between entering and exiting traffic and patrons stopped at the kerosene/diesel pump area in the vicinity of the drive. Left and right turns would be permitted both in and out of the drive. As previously discussed good sight distance will exist at both of the proposed access points at Route 25 and also along the west side of Marratooka Lane. Sight distance, although restricted along Sunset Avenue, can be improved to 500 feet by pruning overhanging tree branches on the east side of Sunset Avenue to the south. It is usual for most of the traffic accessing a facility such as this to be generated from the highway lane adjacent to the facility. Thus, it can be expected that most of the traffic entering this site from Route 25 would originate from the west. The predominant traffic flow therefore would be for most vehicles to enter the site by using the westerly driveway and leave by the easterly driveway on the south side of Route 25. The location of these two driveways provide for an efficient traffic flow both into the site from Route 25 and out of the site onto Route 25. . . Mr. Allan Leon December 5, 1991 Page 4 The formal access drives on Marratooka Lane and Sunset Avenue provided in this access plan will allow for an orderly traffic flow pattern both within the site and on these adjacent roadways. Review of Access SUIll!ested by Southold Town Planning Department The access configuration as suggested by the Southold Town Planning Board would alter the site frontage along the south side of Route 25 to provide raised continuous curbing with only one driveway opening for access to and from the site on Route 25. This single access point on the south side of Route 25 would be located to the west near Sunset Avenue and would allow left and right turns into the site from Route 25 and left and right turns out of the site onto Route 25. The suggested plan also proposes that curbing be installed along the east side of Sunset Avenue with one driveway opening at a point approximately one hundred feet south of Route 25. The driveway will allow left and right turns into the site from Sunset Avenue and left and right turns out of the site onto Sunset Avenue. The access proposed along Marratooka Lane would provide for curbing along the west side of Marratooka Lane with two access driveways. The northerly access driveway would be located approximately fifty feet south of Route 25 and would allow for left and right turns into the site from Marratooka Lane and left and right turn out of the site onto Marratooka Lane. Because of its location, this driveway was intended to service gas customers utilizing the pumps in the front of the facility and also walk. in customers to the convenience food store. The southerly site access driveway as proposed at approximately one hundred feet south of Route 25 on the west side of Marratooka Lane would provide access to a proposed convenience food store drive up window at the rear of the gas station. Since the proposal to provide the convenience food store drive up window at the rear of the gas station has been dropped however, this southerly driveway on Marratooka Lane would be unnecessary. Since this plan provides for only one combined entrance/exit on the Route 25 site frontage, most of the patron traffic will utilize this driveway to enter the site from Route 25 and will exit the site onto Marratooka Lane through the proposed northerly site access driveway on the west side of Marratooka Lane. In order to return to Route 25 from the site, traffic will make a left turn onto Marratooka Lane and will proceed a short distance to the north and then enter Route 25 by either making a right turn or a left turn. The approximate distance between Route 25 and the location of the proposed driveway on Marratooka Lane is 50 feet. Considering a vehicle length at 20 feet, enough storage room will be provided between Route 25 and the northerly site driveway for two and one half cars. During times of uninterrupted traffic flows on Route 25, such as that which occurs during the summer months, few gaps may occur in Route 25 traffic flow that would enable side road traffic to enter the mainstream of Route 25. For this reason, an accumulation of traffic generated from the site at times could queue up from Route 25, across Marratooka Lane and back onto the site, thereby blocking Marratooka Lane to vehicles entering from Route 25. Considering . . Mr. Allan Leon December 5, 1991 Page 5 again the minimal storage area between Route 25 and the northerly site driveway, it would not require too many vehicles to saturate the intersection area and create an all stopped situation. Thus, the provision of only one access point on Route 25 will result in additional traffic on Marratooka Lane which could increase the delays to local traffic on Marratooka Lane desiring to turn onto Route 25. Proposed Improvements As a result of the conduct of our traffic engineering examination, it is recommended that the two driveways on the south side of Route 25 (Main Road) as proposed by the Tartan Oil Corporation plan be installed and maintained as the principal access to the combination gas station and convenience food store. The two driveways will serve both on site and off site traffic needs and will offer the most efficient traffic flow patterns for traffic entering and leaving the site on Route 25. This configuration will allow exiting vehicles to store within the site instead of on Marratooka Lane during times of high uninterrupted traffic flows on Route 25. Providing the two access points on the site frontage on Route 25 will eliminate the potential for a traffic problem on Marratooka Lane. A single access point on Route 25 would result in, a) additional turns for vehicles to access the site, b) internal traffic circulation problems, c) additional traffic volumes on Marratooka Lane and d) additional delays to vehicles accessing Route 25 from Marratooka Lane. Thus, two access points on Route 25 are recommended. Left and right turns into the site and left and right turns out of the site onto Route 25 will be permitted at each of the two site access points on Route 25. It is also recommended that access to the site on Sunset Avenue and Marratooka Lane be channelized through formal driveways instead of the free access which now exists along both of these roadways. Therefore, one access point is recommended on the west side of Marratooka Lane and one access point is recommended on the east side of Sunset Avenue. These access drives would allow left and right turns into the site and left and right turns out of the site from and onto the adjacent roadways. The single access point recommended on the west side of the site on Sunset Avenue would be located a short distance south of Route 25 and would primarily serve the local area residents from the south desiring to access the gas station and convenience food store. The location of this drive would not require removal of major trees located in the tree line along the east side of Sunset Avenue. The location is also compatible with good internal traffic patterns in the area of the kerosene/diesel pump located on the west side of the site. , : . . . Mr. Allan Leon December 5, 1991 Page 6 The proposed parking plan within the site is designed to minimize conflicts between parking and unparking patrons of the convenience food store and drive through vehicles using the gas pumps. It is further recommended the overhanging branches be pruned on the east side of Sunset Avenue to maintain good sight distance to vehicles exiting the site onto Sunset Avenue. I trust this information meets your needs. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please call me. Sincerely, tJ~1 J~. ~~--)f WALTER M. DUNN, JR., P.E. Principal WMD/bf P910057 L910498 \0;.. ~ .' .' CIA TES , G CONSULTANTS \~\ , . Po X'" tiS ~ May 6, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 SouthoJd, NY 11971 Re: Review of Traffic E'/aluation Tartan Oil, NYS Route 25, Mattit\lCk SCTM # 1000.115.3.9 rn ~(Cl~OW~ rn " -y 7 '992 i,A - I SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Dear Benny: As per your authorization we have comoletcd a review of the Traifie evaluation prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates fer tbe abov,e captioned application: The pro~;;ct review was conducted with particular focus on the 3yyhca,nt's r~qu~st. Ie provide two c~r cuts ~long i~s fro~lage on,Main RO,ad (NYS Ro~.t~ LS), Th: f?llowwg comm~nts p~r.taH1.to the SIte, ana the mforrnallon submItted, followeo oy a conClUSion as to the appropn",ene.s of the proposed access and circulation scheme. Existing access to the site is presently uncontrolled along the entire fiont~~<! of Main Road with the exception of removable signage which sometimes restricts access dlrect]y north of the pump tsland. Main Road serves a~ the pr.incipaI access to the site; however, the site may also be acces~cd by Sunset AVefilJe and Marratooka L-me. These secondary access points are also not channelIzed with formal curb cuts. As noted in the Dunn Engineering report, the sight distance at all access points is excellent, excecding the minimum stopping sight distan<;es reco,l1:n:ended ~~ tbe American ,Assocjation ~f ,State Higbw,;'y and Transportation OfflclalS (A Poncy on Geometnc DeSIgn on Highways and :itreelS, AASHTO, 1990), It should be noted that some foliage pruning is recuired on Sunset Avenue in order to mcet and exceed the A<\SHTO recommendl~d rnt"imum stopping sight distance, An examination of the accident history Z.t the intersections of Main Road/Sunset Avenue,and Main Road/Marratooka Lane revealed a.low incidence of traffic accidents, The aCCldem frequency for the three year period from 1987 to 1989 consisted of two reportable a:cidents and one nonreportable accident, AlthO\lgh the accident rate wus l10t expressed in the customary terms of the number of accidents per million vehide'miles of travel, three accidents over a three year period is well below the number of accidents that would warrarJt a "High Accident Location" stat\:s for an btersection on the New York State Department of Transportation highway system, , Observations of the site as presentlv configured rev,~a!ed no operational nroblems and Jnt<.:rnal and. external circul,.tion functloned. welL The addition oi a canopy 'ov,~r the plJmp dlsp,:nser Island is not expected to adversely affect operations or internal circulation, A canopy would serve to provide a better focus to the site in addition to the usual benefits a canopy provides to patrons using the gas pumps (Le. weather protection), I'''[:C I S4.2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MilLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 ?:n-.--4 .. ''--..-. . ~ . -. ....~ .- . . Turtan 011 Trilfflc Review II In addition to the canopy, the applicant proposes to create two curb cuts along Main Road and or,e formal ,:urb cut eaeh on .Sunset Avenue po [.~et s~uth of Main Rpad;, and on Marratooka Lane (sq teet south of MaIn Road)" Clear,y. the curo c'!ts. on the, sIde streets would benefit operatIOns by,u1ore orderly control of tbe fl?w of traffIc mgressmg ~nd egressin" the site from the sIde streets. Curb c~ts 011 the slde roads would also rcauce the number 'Of conflict points with pedestrian and motor vehicle trame along Sunset Avenue and Marratooka Lane, The question re~arding the number of curb cuts on 1hin Road is one that requires assessment "f the specit!c site condi~ions and circulation ?pcrati~ns. Consideration should be given to the geometncs, observatiOn of OJrrent operatlQn5. adjacent and nearby land uses, zite layout and traffic circtdation. The site appears to function well in its present condition. The excelle[,t sight distances are a con:ributlllg factor and the low accident frequency is a confirmation of good operation in the vicinity cf the NYS Route 25/Marratoota Lane intersection. The relatIvely close proximity of the pump island to Main Roa::! lends itself to a "flow-through" operation which would be faciliD.t~d by two curb cuts, The proximllY \Jf the pump island to Main Road also reduces the queum$ area for m~ress and e,eress creatmg conflicts that could degrade cir.::uJation. Such canthers could spill out ont01,,1a1n Road creating delays and hazardous conditions, The presence of a convenience store on site in addition to the ;sas pumps will generate additional internal circulation pat:erns within the sile. The mternai traffic flow pcrmittild by twO curb ctlts on Main Road would become more signif:c::mt in consideration of these additional internal circulation needs. Th3 curb cuts on the (wo side streets will comJ'lement the Main Road curb cuts to help s~parate the iuternal flows and will serve local traflle from Sunset Avenue and Mal'ratooka l-<1ne thereby eliminating additional movements onto NYS Route 25 in order for trips originating from these \',','0 streets, If the presently l!ncon~roJled site access were reduced to only one curb cut on Main Road, this would result in a number of vehicles diverted to the sec(~ndarv acc,:.sscs on the side streets (Marratooka and Sunset Lane). Traffic so diverted to the side streets could in.crease th; ,number of potenti'~1 conflicts. This couid in turn increase accident potential with pedesLn:ans and local traffIC as well as add to the overall delay of traffk trym2 to gain access to Malll Road from Sunset Avenue and MarralOob Lane, We are in ,,"rcement that the alternat,~ flow through traffi~ scenario utilizing one CLlrb cut to Route 25, a~d one curb cut to Marratooka, could result In a danf;emus queuing siwatio:l as vehicles await gaps along Route 25 fmm the Mamltooka Lane side street. . In sumrnary~,the traffk access scenario proposed by tbe applicant appears to be sOHnd v:lth r~spcct to trafLle ol?erations .with no nc"ative impact. Proposed improvements to the site wIll en~ance operatiOns and lmprove sarety due to the prcsentl~ ullcontrolkd site access scheme. It I~; rcc?mmenp~d that two curb cuts 'on Main Road be a!lOv:ed in ,his particular ~ase due to the site. SpCCl\IC conditIon:; of existing site layout and operatiol1s, specificaIlv mtc:rnal/ex!crn~I Clr~lJ!atlcn, separate tr2lffic fk,l.\'s for the on-site convenieilce. store a~d the' d,~slre to rllllllmJZ(~ SIde street conflicts. ' '. CRAMER, v~, J.4S0CIATES ENV:RONMENT~~pf'J>~~G CONSULTANTS ::::: Ct ~ .~ Page 2 ::.....~. 0::' s.::,:: ':::I ." "5! '-I..... co ,=. ..... .. _"'-=- ",1 -c.....:=l ~~- Lv:ot nH..L ZtS-,L ~""""~ -......!:::fl.., . . .- ;. Tartan Ol! Trnmc Review Thank you for the opportunity to provid~ the Beard with this input. PI~a:.e do Dot hesitate to call jf you have any questions. Very II v , ~7-V/ , <<'"<:,.(-4-rT' '-:1 ;> - . ....-....._~.. -~-. -.. ~-== ~ .. . - . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 April 17, 1992 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. country Road Miller Place, NY 11764 RE: Tartan Oil Site Plan Southwest corner of State Rte. 25 and Sunset Avenue, Mattituck Zoning District: Limited Business SCTM# 1000-115-3-9 Dear Mr. Cramer and Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the traffic study for Tartan Oil, previously sent to your office, for review. The Planning Board has received the $500.00 review fee from the applicant. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very truly yours, ~ 6J~~~-/0; Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman . . .Ydt)f!Lt: aV MOORE & MOORE Attorneys at Law 315 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 William D. Moore Patricia C. Moore Tel: (516) 298-5674 Fax: (516) 298-5664 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary Thomas F. Moore Of Counsel April 13, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Tartan oil site plan / Mattituck SCTM# 1000-115-3-9 ~.K~C~ Dear Members of the Board: Enclosed please find a check in the sum of $500.00 for review of the traffic study with respect to the above referenced site plan. Kindly proceed with the necessary review. WDM/mr Enc. ill " m @ rn U Wi rn 1D1\ i'lli ! ,. APR I 5 1992 ..,~.".~ '~n';"'ur . . 1 . PLANNING BOARD MEMBf:RS Bcnncll Orlowski, Jr., Ch,,,rman George Rit,hie LJrhJIn. Jr. Richard G. Ward M.rk S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edw3rd, Scon L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OHICE TOWN OF SQUTHOLD Town Hali. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 S,'uthold. New York J 1971 F~~ (516) 765,1823 Bennett Orlowski:, Jr., Chairman Southold '1'own Planning Board P.O.Box 1179 Southald, New York 11971 00 ~@~OW~ 00 . '~a2 - i 1-' I ,--:.... SOUTHOlD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Re: TI:rznt-N OIL ~/n.:P~ SCTM No. M.+rn rU(,./e.; N. Y. Dear Hr. OrlowSki, Jr., . It is estimated that the cost of reviewing the above-noted application as per your let;:er of Fe-s. ZS" , 19 should not exceed $ 900 4 F()1t. 13071-1 fW:QY/6'WS. '* No work in excess of that amount will be undertaken by this office unless so authorized by the Planning Board in l,dUng_ Please notify this office in writing if you wish us to undert.ake the review. ours, Voorhis Southold TOWn Planning Board Facsimile Number: 765-1823 * .# 4'00. (h' :II S'()O. DO S17rll/OA'RD F'6Ti' iO ~e:.y/~ (.(;;.'7fF /=&-o:" 71) ,eGY/A.v 7R,#'"F.lC. Re:;ooR"r M8"&..O INS~cr $/Tt;:" MIJ> />k()Y/,{)(F~ .Dt.:<1>>It.SO ~ OF F~NI>!N~S A-;VD ~t!F(.()/V/Y6'N/JI'1'i"'ON4. ZA~.-f ____.-..-.~_=....... -= I . I J.--. ,-,... , .~ ""'" 11....-. ~.-.. '"-... _ ~. ....,.. = ___ T _"'"-<I -'..... . . CRAMER, Vt4iq\ JAs~CIATES ENVIRONMEN~~p~IA.~~JG CONSULTANTS . ~'( VS Date: --5/=1 q '2. UD]I1@l1aWI1 FAX TRANSMITTAL WI _ "1, I Fax Number (516) 331-8046 ,-92 II SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARO To: l/rJu ...; From:: Clht: Re: ~-r>W _a, Number of Pages (including cover): 2 If the total transmittal is not rccch'.d call (516) 331,.1455 I Comments: ~lti / /;hs ftGV/r;N I~ A/or tSOtN\J lj)/lfl'tG~ It-~ ""J't:r Mc-- S7)U /!W/h n~ ~ 6- 0 - ;'frfpM l:YV i7lr ~/'f(;-O I'ft.. 0'<:0 sm... . We WI tf.- A.ICls--o /Uour 2- ~.1 71> UN'4/ltC77!::" ~ OA-n;- OF- riv~/Z--+r1(HI , hM I~ A./I:;>.,--- IJ.IJ ~121t.. [;0/...$ VVKc;, O'l'rk-"'d1:-f a 6"" Ph< f.::O (J t fi2.11J tf"'y .AI &c A.h ft.(,. Nlt(.. "t ~3 -.-I -~ _ --.".....""...=0-0 ~ 0=. I IJ ....-...-......"' _...=::0.....-...-., ""'......-. S4-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD. MILLEP PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 ...,.. "'-: ~ T __ ""-' -I...... " . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennet( Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOIT L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (51~) 765-193R PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Soulhold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 April 7, 1992 William D. Moore Suite 3 Clause Corrunons Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Tartan Oil Site Plan Southwest corner of State Rte. 25 and Sunset Avenue, Mattituck Zoning District: Limited Business SCTMi 1000-115-3-9 Dear Mr. Moore: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $500.00 from their environmental consultant for review of the traffic study. This fee must be paid in full by your client prior to our consultants starting their review. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. Very truly yours, ~~/<A-~. C;Z.~1 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. , . . PLANNING DOARO ME~18ERS B<.:nnclt Orlowski. Jr.. Ch:.tirman George Riti,:hic LJth~lm. Jr. Rj,hard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kennclh L. Edward, seo',;;' ~. :1ARRIS Supervisor Telephone (5 i 6) 765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OfFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town H"Ii. 53095 Main R,.ad P.O. Box J 179 S"uthold. New Yo'k 11971 Fax (516) 765.1823 Bennett Orlowski:, Jr., Chairman Southold ']'Own Planning Board F.O.Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 00 ~@~OW~ 00 - .~C,? - , ,..-......- SOUTHOLO TOWN PLANNING BOARD Re: T4?z 17r-;v 0, to. ~ / I (.~ PWhy SCJ:ll No. M/i7'n ru(,./<:; N. Y. Dear Hr. OrIol",ski, Jr., . It is estimated that the cost cf rc:vic;;wing the above-noted application as per your let;:er of Fel!!.. ZS- , 19 should not exceed $ 900 J FOI'e. 13071-1 Rt;:'//6"ws. "* No I",ork in excess of that amount will be undertaken by this office ~nless so authorized by the Planning,Board in writing. --" Please notify this offic~ in writing if you wish us to uncart.ake the review. v/7?ottrs. ~hi' Southold Tovm Planning Board Facsimile l1umber: 765-1823 * .:# ~CO. Oi) ST:'t7VO"tnD F-e--r..- ";'0 iZc:Y/C1v u..:::;f-F f/ 5'00. DO F=&C;:- 71) I?GY/:?I''/ m.t-FF'(. Rf3PO/?:'r ...;:;;&~O I/'/SF'<7CJ S/J7;.. ,,17/t> 'p-€(I~"/)tr ,/)t.:n'ltSO ~ DF F"ND!N~$. /f-'VD ;C?rSC.()/'1/V(S""NI)/n70~. ;:::,~ -.-t "':;:. _ ........... -=- -=-....... "'=' , '. .I....... r. ... ~ .4 _... ..... -... .. --, .- - --- - ."." .-- - '-1-'_ . yjP;:;za;;;>:r-_ ~i;Y~UfFOlr'1~, ,,"v~ t'a\\ (fSV . ,. ~~)' ;;, ' ~ Q ,I .. I- en ( :p: \010': \ _ !:!! , i:::',,;,:'I'~ _' ~ (- '~it~ ~~l ~-<c_':77;::Xj:ffJJ . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Harch 5, 1992 William D. Moore Suite 3 Clause Commons Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Tartan Oil Site Plan Southwest corner of State Rte. 25 and Sunset Avenue, Mattituck Zoning District: Limited Business SCTM~ 1000-115-3-9 Dear Mr. Moore: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $500.00 from their environmental consultant for review of Part I and Part II of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. This fee must be paid in full by your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. Very truly yours, ~~~~AT ~<-A--'/tJ-/ci- Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. . . .,5tf4130 u;:- f'~ ItK I lis MOORE & MOORE ! Attorneys at Law / 315 WestphaIia Road ~ P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 William D. Moore Patricia C. Moore Tel: (516) 298-5674 Fax: (516) 298-5664 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary Thomas F. Moore Of Counsel February 24, 1992 Southold Town Southold Town Main Road Southold, NY Planning Board Hall 11971 Re: Tartan oil site plan / Mattituck SCTM # 1000-115-3-9 Dear Members of the Board: I am in receipt of your letter dated February 20, 1992, and have spoken with your office staff regarding the Mattituck Mobil site. Our client had hoped that before incurring the expense of drawing up the full blown site plan, that the Board would review the traffic study and advise if it agreed with the traffic engineer's conclusions regarding two curb cuts for state Route 25, and the curb cuts as proposed by the applicant on Sunset Ave. and Marratooka Road. The site plan which was provided was done primarily to provide a base of information for the traffic study. Please advise if this proposed method of proceeding is acceptable. cc: Tartan oil ill ore ~ @ ~ 0 \Yl ~ ~~il I'TI , , ~ FIB 2 6 · ~J WDM/mr ''It=-=tF - ----- _ - 'c-~ :.:: r'l I~I t ! 1 5 : .. C' r-- .:-> ,',', 0;;0- r-- .. ..... .:::. ..::. r-- t-, i ~~~= P. 10 1 F~1('h~~!"d Cr. V".'Jj SU6RU: /'6 ;f'K ,/ ~ SCOTT L. HARRIS Supavi:-ior PL!\!\l.T'\G F":):'.:<:.: >:r:.",:ii!", B,;t;,h,:i~ Cd;, ""', .1,., t.-" ,.' ',". G;.:\.':~<-, R:!..-i'iic L:i(,;:;.:;" J, 'T1,');:.r'hu,r,c- {51f.} ~'!DS"i(;},:, PLAr\NlNG BOARD OFFICE TOW", CF SOUTHOLD '[':>wlIlI:II:, 53095 r,bin R(lild P.O. Box 1179 ',outhuid. New yo,k I J 971 M.,r~. S ;\LD.~f::":U }.:;-~'!~n':lh L. F..i\'Jrj. Fax (516) 765-1823 E0n:l~tt O~~o~2klf Jr~1 Chairlnan Scuth;)l.d ~~~~ Fla~~ing Board PfO.Dc\:.: :179 SOlltho-1~t Ne~,: York 11972. R",: '/ ..hz r:7r/ 01<.. ~l71F'P<-1-", SCTIl No. 14mn rJC-K J N. Y: Deal ~_-'! '.r C,r lO.....1~3~..i f -r.,._ ,~:-:' f~5.,":~i;;-;.':1t:?"3 t - - )$+~ 0:: ~'(;'./le'v/.1.n'3' t:.he abovt~~noted f ,f='E;;~._. ::~ S- I 19 eho'lld net ,- ,~.".- ',. ;,.... "'-'..~ '.. ". ,'. -~ ?' . '-' '- ,~~ '--- '~i: i? {\ ...~ l- ~/'-i;_ ,~- , .'",.;i.., i<~";-4i'''/L.:r'W~ 'iO '* }.;,- .. eY<::~?:s'.s ;-", ~'<'" ....','~ '" ;ncunt will. be undertaken by this .h~ PJ~ll!l~~g Board in wri~ing. ::':~.. l,_:' ::;-~: o'.;'(hr:::'-" ::(:;:::.:: "t')l ?le022 notify tl1iB cfiice ..n wriLing if you wish us to UndC;l:'t2~ke th~:..;' review. V/Ji!!O""g, ~lc~ Vooi~is Sout~ole T~\Vl~ Pl~~:lins Board Fae oS ur;i 18 ~{~lr:1b:~ 1': ~ ? 6,) -18 2:3 ~: . </;/ f _J....'!,....--. <.-: .') "'1'/ 7 ,v..,...J "- ~ ': "')i.-' ,,', _hc- I\. -..~. """'" -- I., , ..-, ...~.,,,'. ..'..'......... r-::: t..~ 1\.1 ,.~ c.. ' ~. ; C"'>~ lc.,.,,"-~ t-f/C:-' ;,'V' u......-/Tr .fj c'''' ~ ~r ., F..::c;."... p' 'c_ "'r->-.n...., .,."" ~'''''''''/'_ ;'.:>'=}''''~i'.r:-- ~;;;........." "'- A~C.-.t't,.lf'" '......"'77":.1-'...... ..'.....,f.....f'~.r ,,~.c;.~~ :';,I"u,:: ~-;:/~'I..:;:: /t'1Y.P :[::~::. /~"-..'/~F [)(/',:f.;;: ~'. r~'!."} P':.!<:'OI//.:::"~ .t.>!..--rrt;LG~ ~ ./:,,-:-( 0,"",016"/11 b~rJ'() ,VS;. ;.....-1# . . PL/\~:!':jt\c; ~:.:::..'".J~.D ;~t.E>;~;t:r:::; B..:riih:!;: Ork,',. :.~. , .L,., C:ru.! ",n Gi,;\.':~"" R:!_,,;hic. L:::;h;l~f', 11 Ei':-::~:',i G. \V;~rd SCOTT L. HARRiS Sup~rvl:-;or :-:';:,'r~n":lh L. F,kJr:J; PL..L~Nt~J1N(~ BOAn.n ()l~"FICE TOWN CF SOUTHOLD Town !bJ:. 53095 !\hin ROil' 1'.0. Box 1119 ~)o!.Jtno)d. N~\v Y Oir.: If Y71 \Lr.:". S. M..:D\~n;~]j 1I,'kph,_;.'1'Z (516} ~10S" ;().~,,;, Fux (516) 765.IH23 Eenrl~tt Or!o~i2ki, Jr., SCLI1:hr)}.d Fla~~in; CL-::::li.rman Pi (). Do,::-: }, 1 7 9 - . ~~~)2..!"::l SOL~thol<: t N(~~) Y(xrk 11972. Re: ," ,,};.u::t1'/ 01<.. :) n (;- PiAl, SCTIl No, M~17'TJ rJc.K. N. ':I. " De7l.t' ~~,.. . . . -'7' I ~ Ul.l..'. w~...:......, , r -' - ~ .- -r_ - ':' .'~::-~"'~.J...:-;-.3'':'~~-~ "', . ~ ~~~....;.., ....~<-- ....., '.~ .~... :0-- ~. h _.~ ;. (;-::.::::<:.:;-:_ 2 ,'3..':~ ;-::-~;." ___.9' i? Ll ~{j~ ~'--::.; ,_;_.t: '-:=-- .'.' - )5:. of ::"G'./.i"e'~'/in\J the abovt~~noted . f 'F .::;~"- < :~: $"- 19 ;;;h;;:;'lld net r';:;!;;'~i/I t:,'"W::'. "* !'"-O.J-l:_ w'ff i,_::t:: ~:-;::"(:2~:':::-:o ~-:_:) at;"(hc.'_: ti0 ~~:rk ir1 ex~css ,.....,..... '--. ;~ou~t will. b~ unde~take~ ~y this '<<nc: Pl::;.nn1.~:g BO,;~l'd l.n Wl:~ l:l.ng. Z ;;3<i by Ple02G notify tllis uIldcrtake th~ review. ,...,C.::.;: ....,'3 _-,,"...A-~_ ..n \,."t":!.1_inq if ~l',)U wish us to '-. v/JJ!!om, L/ . eii,Hl"s Vc:'orh,is S;:,,:~~ L,.::I-':: ::_','i,~ Pl.3.!1nin:-:; BOd..rd Fac~-: irt.ilt;: }!~lt:1b2r _~ 76.5=1823 '1_." -.";'--. "-,-. 1/ "':?' .~:J{j:>.. 0 () <' ._,- <'. <~- A, -'..,. """'- ~ 1....-1 ~-,,;/: ./;:-...... r::: '-'~ 'v R '.r--,' ~. L~,f/_~... ,/ (-<--/i-F. ""~ ~ ~ - ~ s .< ~ ,--" -"'- ':-. -'"- "r T~ -1 ;:'-.t::-,_> T7_- :>,-....... . - ,- -......,.'" - -. ">....--) ~.."J" ~ '1- . ...., <-- ,;I,:v,.,~ 7-"<-1-cr"_ "', ~,",n..;< <:,. .""7 C:~ /.../$/-.,'(;-; .c;../Tl.:;::..+tV/.' .P:~(.W/.:)tr ,t;<'.-~rtILG".:J ~ C'~ r-/ND!/'r'cl:: A?II.b RC-'-(O,^,WC/VIJ/h-}'C,VS:. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards ~~rI~\lfFot~~, '-':.> , . 'ie-. ""., ~ c,--' .- .:-c:. Vol " . > "" . ...., ,,' ,." 0...... '';-~,l. . " '-~, '''1f. ~. ,~\- ( .'0./ ,_ ~~.Ij ~,,(-- ..' ~ '.,--oP ~0qDY;DflJ~ 1 . . SCOIT L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box I 179 Soulhold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 February 25, 1992 Cramer & Voorhis & associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, NY 11764 RE: Tartan Oil Site Plan Southwest corner of State Rte. 25 and Sunset Avenue, Mattituck Zoning District: Dear Mr. Cramer & Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the traffic study for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. A Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) will be sent to you as soon as it is received from the applicant. Please develop an estimate of what it would cost to undertake both reviews. Enter the cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send it by facsimile to this office. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the reviews, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order ....authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact the Planning staff. Sincerely, /f? l / . <..-'"'7 1f:-n/)-I[/-/ L-tC-OJ--v\J4'c-<----, /" /c/r Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~ Chairman /. .0.<;L CJ. . /,..," / r. .:>, , < , " . "". ~ t "./ ,:';;'/lr /.~// ! . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOlT L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 , Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board P.O.Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: SCTM No. Dear Mr. Orlowski, Jr., It is estimated that the cost application as per your letter of exceed $ of reviewing the above-noted ,19 should not No work in excess of that amount will be undertaken by this office unless so authorized by the Planning Board in writing. Please notify this office in writing if you wish us to undertake the review. - , Very Truly Yours, Charles Voorhis Southold Town Planning Board Facsimile Number: 765-1823 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards . ~r..' .' ~\ ~~",~ iJ <%?zrrrfiJj;fr , SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February (><,t. v >. ( 21, 1992 Fax (516) 765-1823 william D. Moore Suite 3 Clause Commons Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Tartan oil site Plan Southwest corner of State Rte. 25 and Sunset Avenue, Mattituck Zoning District: Limited Business SCTM~ 1000-115-3-9 Dear Mr. Moore: The Planning Board has received your letter of January 31, 1992, containing a traffic study and one copy of a site plan. The Board will get an estimate from its consultant to review the study and you will be informed of the charge. This fee must be paid before the Board can continue with its review. The site plan is incomplete, a copy of the Board's letter to you of June 8, 1990, is enclosed for your guidance. A Long Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the deed to the property is required to complete your application. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Very truly yours, 'i3;fi'I~~~~~r (L. his Bennett Orlowsk1, Jr. ?1' Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector i r-~ . _,\NNI0~G IOARD MEMBERS :~crnelt Or!: wski. Jr.. Chainnan rieorgf: F tchic Latham. Jr. Rich .rd G. Ward M, ck i. McDonald Kerlnt::ll L. Edwards sCali L. HARRIS Supervisor "elephor, (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTH OLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 June 8, 1990 WU liam D. Moore SIL. te 3 Cli1c.lse Commons MOL:1 Road Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Tartan Oil Site Plan Southwest corner of State Rte. 25 and Sunset Avenue, Mattituck SCTM#1000-115-3-9 Dec. ~ Mr. Moore: The Planing Board has reviewed the revised map dated April 18, 1990. The following changes must be made before the Board can prcl:eed with its review. 1. Drainage plan and calculations must be shown. 2. Parking calculations must be shown, including handicapped parking. 3. An enlarged diagram of the floor plan showing all uses must be provided. 4. Curbing must be installed around the entire property. 5. One curb cut must b~ provided on Route 25 and one cut on Marratooka Road. There is to be no curb cut on Sunset Lane. The curb cut on Marratooka Road should be located away from the intersection. 6. A landscaping plan must be provided. Street trees must be provided on Route 25, Marratooka Lane and Sunset Avenue. .. ". . . . -- l'c,ge 2 ~J:'crton oil 7. The free standing sign must be twenty-five (25) feet from the front and/or rear property line. The maximum height of such sign shall be fifteen (15) feet. 8. Percent (%) lot coverage and landscaping must be shown. 9. The total area of the property must be shown. 10. A lighting plan must be shown. All lighting must be shielded from adjoining properties. A copy of your letter to the Plan~ing Board dated January 11, 1989 confirming many of the above items is enclosed for your reference. In addition to the above, consideration should be given to relocating the parking in front of the underground storage tanks to facilitate the delivery of fuel. If you have any questions or require further assistance plEase contact this office. Very truly yours, ~~rYS~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~t/~ Chairman Encl. .. ". ... ... . . 6u(jFIU:: ;26 . v:5 J %-- MOORE & MOORE Attorneys at Law 315 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 Tel: (516) 298-5674 Fax: (516) 298-5664 William D. Moore Patricia C. Moore Margaret Rutkowski Secretary Thomas F. Moore Of Counsel January 31, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Tartan Oil / Mattituck Mobil Station SCTM # 1000-115-3-9 Dear Members of the Board: Enclosed please find the traffic engineering report prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates dated December 5, 1991 which addresses the Mobil Gas Station on Route 25 in Mattituck. We requested this study to address, in particular, the number of curb cuts to provide ingress and egress to the site. Also enclosed is a copy of the site plan upon which this traffic study was made. Please advise if you find the site plan with the conclusions of the traffic study acceptable, and we will furnish additional prints of the site plan and continue with the review process with you. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. cc: Tartan Oil Co. ..., '" -") U ft ~ \~JJL~ ~~ fEB -, roL l~ SllI.!!~. WDM/mr Encls. . Dunn Engineering Asslates Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 1197B 516-2B8-2480 .. , . , Mr. Allan Leon Tartan Oil Company 532 Broadhollow Road P.O. Box 1017 Melville, New York 11747 December 5, 1991 RE: Traffic Engineering Examination Mobil Gas Station Route 25 Mattituck Town of Southold, New York Dear Mr. Leon: In accordance with the requests by Mr. Bill Moore, Esq. and you, Dunn Engineering Associates has completed a professional traffic engineering examination of the Mobil Gas Station and convenience food store on the south side of Route 25 between Sunset Avenue and Marratooka Lane in Mattituck, Town of Southold, New York. The major aspects of our examination included: a) a review of the existing access in relation to the internal and external traffic flows as well as sight distances and accident records, b) the improved access to the site as proposed by Tartan Oil Corporation in relation to expected internal and external traffic flows, c) the access to the site as suggested by the Town of Southold Planning Department in relation to expected internal and external traffic flows, and d) necessary improvements to enhance the traffic flow. These aspects are discussed in the following paragraphs of this letter report. Review of Existinl1 Access. Sii1ht Distance. and Accident Records With the exception of a short section of curb located on the southwest corner radius of Marratooka Lane and Route 25 (Main Road), the site is uncurbed along the entire frontage on the south side of Route 25. Therefore, access can be obtained to the site at any point along Route 25. Entering and exiting traffic presently use the entire frontage to access the site. In addition, no curbs exist along the site frontage on the west side of Marratooka Lane, and access is obtained by entering and exiting the site at any point along the site frontage on Marratooka Lane. The site frontage along the east side of Sunset Avenue is uncurbed between the south side of Route 25 and a tree line which covers a portion of the site frontage along the east side of Sunset Avenue. Thus, access to the site is obtained at any point along the east side of Sunset Avenue between Route 25 and the existing tree line. . . ~ . .' Mr. Allan Leon December 5, 1991 Page 2 Our review of sight distances indicated that available sight distance is good at all points along the site frontage on Route 25. This available sight distance along Route 25 ranges from 900 feet to the east and over 1000 feet to the west at the easterly end of the site on Route 25. At the westerly end of the site on Route 25, the sight distance available to the east is 800 feet and 750 feet to the west. Sight distances range between these values at other points along the uncurbed site frontage on Route 25. At the intersection of Marratooka Lane and Route 25 good sight distance exists to both the east and the west with a sight distance of 900 feet to the east and 1000 feet to the west along Route 25. Sight distance is also good along Marratooka Lane to the south from the easterly side of the site where available sight distance is 600 feet. Furthermore at the intersection of Sunset Avenue and Route 25 good sight distance also exists to both the east and west with a sight distance of 800 feet to the east and 750 feet to the west along Route 25. Sight distance to the south on Sunset Avenue from the west side of the site is somewhat restricted by brush and tree branches growing out over the edge of pavement to the south. However, this sight distance would be improved to 500 feet or more by minor pruning. Based on accepted sight distance standards, the stopping sight distance required at Route 25 based on a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour is 400 feet. Furthermore, the stopping sight distance required on Marratooka Lane and Sunset Avenue is 350 feet based on a posted area speed limit of 35 miles per hour. Therefore, the existing available sight distances at Route 25 and Marratooka Lane, Route 25 and Sunset Avenue and across the Route 25 site frontage are excellent based upon minimum stopping sight distances. Also, sight distances on Marratooka Lane to the south from the easterly site frontage is excellent based on minimum stopping sight distances. The improvable sight distance to the south on Sunset Avenue would exceed minimum stopping sight distance values after some pruning was accomplished. Accident data was obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation on all the accidents that have occurred in the vicinity of the site over the three year period of 1987 through 1989. This accident information revealed that over the three year period, one reportable accident occurred in 1987 at Route 25 and Sunset Avenue. At the intersection of Route 25 and Marratooka Lane, over the three year period, one reportable accident occurred in 1987 and one classified as a non reportable accident occurred in 1988. No accidents were reported on Route 25 along the site frontage between Marratooka Lane and Sunset Avenue during the three year period. Non reportable accidents are those accidents that are not required to be reported to the Department of Motor Vehicles. A review of this data revealed that these intersections are not considered as high accident locations. Furthermore, this data revealed there is no serious traffic safety problems in the vicinity of the site. This accident information is particularly significant in view of the fact that in times of heavy uninterrupted traffic flow on Route 25, it becomes difficult to make turns out of Marratooka Lane and Sunset Avenue, particularly in the summer. fI' . . . Mr. Allan Leon December 5, 1991 Page 3 Our observations of existing conditions revealed that there are no major problems with the internal or external traffic flows at the site. However some recommended modifications regarding access to the site are contained in a following section of this letter. These modifications are intended to enhance both the internal site circulation and minimize potential external traffic flow problems. Review of Access As Proposed by Tartan Oil Complll\Y The access configuration as proposed by Tartan Oil Corporation in their revised site plan of November 20, 1991 would alter the site frontage along the south side of Route 25 to provide raised continuous curbing with two separate driveway openings for access to and from the site on Route 25. The westerly access point would be 30 feet wide and would be located approximately 25 feet east of Sunset Avenue. This access drive would allow left and right turns into the site and left and right turns out of the site onto Route 25. Another 30 foot wide easterly access drive would be located on Route 25 approximately 35 feet west of Marratooka Lane. This access drive would allow left and right turns into the site and left and right turns out of the site onto Route 25. This access plan, on the easterly side of the site would provide a raised curb extending 125 feet south of Route 25. Site access would be provided by a 25 foot wide drive on the west side of Marratooka Lane and would be located 50 feet south of Route 25. This access drive would permit right and left turns out of the site and left and right turns into the site. Along the westerly side of the site, on the east side of Sunset Avenue a raised curb extending 70 feet south of Route 25 would be provided. Site access on Sunset Avenue would be by a 25 foot drive located 30 feet south of Route 25. The curb and access drive have been located to afford the least adverse impact on an established tree line on the east side of Sunset Avenue. The location of the drive also is suited to reduce potential internal traffic conflicts between entering and exiting traffic and patrons stopped at the kerosene/diesel pump area in the vicinity of the drive. Left and right turns would be permitted both in and out of the drive. As previously discussed good sight distance will exist at both of the proposed access points at Route 25 and also along the west side of Marratooka Lane. Sight distance, although restricted along Sunset Avenue, can be improved to 500 feet by pruning overhanging tree branches on the east side of Sunset Avenue to the south. It is usual for most of the traffic accessing a facility such as this to be generated from the highway lane adjacent to the facility. Thus, it can be expected that most of the traffic entering this site from Route 25 would originate from the west. The predominant traffic flow therefore would be for most vehicles to enter the site by using the westerly driveway and leave by the easterly driveway on the south side of Route 25. The location of these two driveways provide for an efficient traffic flow both into the site from Route 25 and out of the site onto Route 25. . . Mr. Allan Leon December 5, 1991 Page 4 The formal access drives on Marratooka Lane and Sunset Avenue provided in this access plan will allow for an orderly traffic flow pattern both within the site and on these adjacent roadways. Review of Access SUi:l1ested by Southold Town PlanniT\11 Department The access configuration as suggested by the Southold Town Planning Board would alter the site frontage along the south side of Route 25 to provide raised continuous curbing with only one driveway opening for access to and from the site on Route 25. This single access point on the south side of Route 25 would be located to the west near Sunset Avenue and would allow left and right turns into the site from Route 25 and left and right turns out of the site onto Route 25. The suggested plan also proposes that curbing be installed along the east side of Sunset Avenue with one driveway opening at a point approximately one hundred feet south of Route 25. The driveway will allow left and right turns into the site from Sunset Avenue and left and right turns out of the site onto Sunset Avenue. The access proposed along Marratooka Lane would provide for curbing along the west side of Marratooka Lane with two access driveways. The northerly access driveway would be located approximately fifty feet south of Route 25 and would allow for left and right turns into the site from Marratooka Lane and left and right turn out of the site onto Marratooka Lane. Because of its location, this driveway was intended to service gas customers utilizing the pumps in the front of the facility and also walk-in customers to the convenience food store. The southerly site access driveway as proposed at approximately one hundred feet south of Route 25 on the west side of Marratooka Lane would provide access to a proposed convenience food store drive up window at the rear of the gas station. Since the proposal to provide the convenience food store drive up window at the rear of the gas station has been dropped however, this southerly driveway on Marratooka Lane would be unnecessary. Since this plan provides for only one combined entrance/exit on the Route 25 site frontage, most of the patron traffic will utilize this driveway to enter the site from Route 25 and will exit the site onto Marratooka Lane through the proposed northerly site access driveway on the west side of Marratooka Lane. In order to return to Route 25 from the site, traffic will make a left turn onto Marratooka Lane and will proceed a short distance to the north and then enter Route 25 by either making a right turn or a left turn. The approximate distance between Route 25 and the location of the proposed driveway on Marratooka Lane is 50 feet. Considering a vehicle length at 20 feet, enough storage room will be provided between Route 25 and the northerly site driveway for two and one half cars. During times of uninterrupted traffic flows on Route 25, such as that which occurs during the summer months, few gaps may occur in Route 25 traffic flow that would enable side road traffic to enter the mainstream of Route 25. For this reason, an accumulation of traffic generated from the site at times could queue up from Route 25, across Marratooka Lane and back onto the site, thereby blocking Marratooka Lane to vehicles entering from Route 25. Considering . . Mr. Allan Leon December 5, 1991 Page 5 again the minimal storage area between Route 25 and the northerly site driveway, it would not require too many vehicles to saturate the intersection area and create an all stopped situation. Thus, the provision of only one access point on Route 25 will result in additional traffic on Marratooka Lane which could increase the delays to local traffic on Marratooka Lane desiring to turn onto Route 25. Pro'posed Improvements & a result of the conduct of our traffic engineering examination, it is recommended that the two driveways on the south side of Route 25 (Main Road) as proposed by the Tartan Oil Corporation plan be installed and maintained as the principal access to the combination gas station and convenience food store. The two driveways will serve both on site and off site traffic needs and will offer the most efficient traffic flow patterns for traffic entering and leaving the site on Route 25. This configuration will allow exiting vehicles to store within the site instead of on Marratooka Lane during times of high uninterrupted traffic flows on Route 25. Providing the two access points on the site frontage on Route 25 will eliminate the potential for a traffic problem on Marratooka Lane. A single access point on Route 25 would result in, a) additional turns for vehicles to access the site, b) internal traffic circulation problems, c) additional traffic volumes on Marratooka Lane and d) additional delays to vehicles accessing Route 25 from Marratooka Lane. Thus, two access points on Route 25 are recommended. Left and right turns into the site and left and right turns out of the site onto Route 25 will be permitted at each of the two site access points on Route 25. It is also recommended that access to the site on Sunset Avenue and Marratooka Lane be channelized through formal driveways instead of the free access which now exists along both of these roadways. Therefore, one access point is recommended on the west side of Marratooka Lane and one access point is recommended on the east side of Sunset Avenue. These access drives would allow left and right turns into the site and left and right turns out of the site from and onto the adjacent roadways. The single access point recommended on the west side of the site on Sunset Avenue would be located a short distance south of Route 25 and would primarily serve the local area residents from the south desiring to access the gas station and convenience food store. The location of this drive would not require removal of major trees located in the tree line along the east side of Sunset Avenue. The location is also compatible with good internal traffic patterns in the area of the kerosene/diesel pump located on the west side of the site. .. # (, . Mr. Allan Leon December 5, 1991 Page 6 The proposed parking plan within the site is designed to minimize conflicts between parking and unparking patrons of the convenience food store and drive through vehicles using the gas pumps. It is further recommended the overhanging branches be pruned on the east side of Sunset Avenue to maintain good sight distance to vehicles exiting the site onto Sunset Avenue. I trust this information meets your needs. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please call me. Sincerely, bJ~ ff,. ~); WALTER M. DUNN, JR, P.E. Principal WMD/bf P910057 L910498 \r Jr>,\>\ '2 . . /15"- 3-............. MOORE & MOORE Attorneys at Law Clause Commons Suite 3 Main Road P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 su~ P6 If.:; ../ Ix "'"y ( Tel: (516) 298-5674 Fax: (516) 298-5664 William D. Moore Patricia C. Moore Margaret Rutkowski Secretary July 2, 1991 Francis J. Yakaboski, Esq. Smith, Finkelstein, Lundberg, Isler & Yakaboski 456 Griffing Avenue P.O. Box 389 Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Town of Southold / Mattituck Mobil Dear Frank: This letter is written at the request of our client Tartan Oil Corp. to explain why the site plan application for the Mattituck Mobil has not been pursued before the Southold Town Planning Board. This is a case in which our office must accept the responsibility. A few months ago, I spoke with our client and we left the conversation each thinking that the other was going to do something with respect to the site plan. I was waiting for information from my client and my client was waiting for information from me, as a result nothing was accomplished. We have straightened that problem out and a revised site plan which will attempt to address the concerns raised by the planning board in our last conference with them will be submitted as soon as it is ready. Please convey my apologies to the planning board for this confusion. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, :fd M=' WDM/rnr cc: Tartan Oil Corp. Ken Robinson, Esq. JUL 24 /99/ ~ . . ~ .. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G, Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 17, 1991 william D. Moore suite 3 Clause Commons Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Tartan Oil Site Plan Southwest corner of State Rte. 25 and Sunset Avenue, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-115-3-9 Dear Mr. Moore: The Planning Board has reviewed the revised map dated April 18, 1990, that you had given to the Board at its public meeting on November 5, 1990. The Board would like you to provide a traffic study which addresses the following concerns: 1. Justification for providing two curb cuts on State Route 25, instead of one, which we had requested. 2. Estimated impact of site changes and proposed uses on the traffic flow and traffic safety on State Route 25, Marratooka Lane, and Sunset Lane. Our records show that while the fee was paid, the application was not completed. Please submit a completed site plan application form and an environmental assessment form and nine copies of the revised site plan. A new site plan application and assessment form are enclosed. Upon receipt of the traffic study and the environmental form, the Board will submit the reports to its environmental consultants for review. The fee for the review will be determined at that time, and you will be informed of the charges. upon receipt of the fee, revised site plan, and completion of the review by the consultants, the Planning Board will beqin the environmental review. . . Page 2 Tarton Oil The enclosed sketch is a suggested layout for the site. If you have any questions or wish to meet with the Planning Board Staff, please contact this office. Very truly yours, 13~ ~./ 0-~-I- Bennett Orlowski, Jr ;r/,~~ Chairman Encls. cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector . '''- PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOlT L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 FROM: Matthew Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Board of Appeals Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman $.o.1"-/IIS December 24, 1990 TO: DATE: RE: Tartan oil Corporation SCTM# 1000-115-3-9 The Tartan Oil Company plans to install a microwave oven in its store in Mattituck. It proposes to offer soup, canned and frozen food, pasta and other types of groceries. The site plan shows a drive up window for the store. The Planning Board would like your opinion, in writing, as to whether this business is a drive in restaurant, fast food restaurant or retail food shop. . ~.- ., ,- '7 ~.' .".."" "'!'-:~-~"':r:.",.< :~-J':.. --, _~- _ ... :'""'-.'.:.:":"::"~l.C'~'''~~'''IO:., '.-- - - ----''>ffW,,,.c,,...', ':.'\>~' . --":i> -"."'~""~"'-' Lr__'~_."""'''''__'c~ " ,,,-' ~~;;'~..' ;!"" ~ , . ( ~. - 9d;/1LC Ib ,e/C ...s January 2, 1991 I1r. Louis DeRonde 16 Victoria Drive Am1tyville, NY 11701 Dear :1r. DeRonde: Our ease # 90-425 TartlUl Oil Co. Mobil Service Station Route, 25, Mattituck Your December 4, 1990 Submission This is in reference to the site plans for the above noted project which were submitted to this office for review. Prior to the issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. Install 5 foot wide sidewalk offaet 5 feet from face of curb full frontage of site. Install sod between curb and sidewalk. 2. Existing curbed radius at Maratooks Lane &lust be replaced. A 25 foot curbed radius must be installed at Sunset Avenue and Maratooka Lane. Dimension radius on plans. Install handicap ramps at radii. 3. The utility pole shown at Maratooka Lane may not be located properly on your plan. New curb installation will impact this pole and may req ui re its reloca tion. 4. The concrete apron for the curb cuts must be 8 inches thick, including one sidewalk panel on each side of the curb cut. This is necesssry to accommodate delivery vehicles entering the site. Show this detail on the plans. 5. Proposed curb cuts IIlUst be installed perpendicular to Route 25. The westerly curb cut must be offset a minimum of 20 feet from the radius at Sunset Avenue. Provide the same offset for the curb cut on Sunset Avenue. , .-41991 {.'~ #r.---'.;"~~'er-.'"'40~',r:..'" ""':-'~':'.-~- ;'r~~,::--""",,,:;---~;tllll.....,;~ ~,,"-'-"'~,.'-"'-~ , .' - . ~ '.1 Mr. Louis De Ronde Page 2 January 2, 1991 6. Relocate or replace the R1-1 "Yield" sign on Sunset Lane. All signs must be reflectorized and a note stating sam shown on the plans. 7. Install interior curbing between the two proposed curb cuts. Attached for your use is a marked set of plans. Resubmission of revised plans must be identified as revisions and must refer to our case number. Failureto provide this information will delay the processing of your permit. Prior to issuance of a Highway Work Permit you must submit four sets of the revised plans, permit fee, surety bond (sample enclosed) and a completed protective liabili ty insurance fo rm (PERM 17 enclosed). You must comply with Option A of this form. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"): Not applicable at this time. Bond Amount: Not applicable at this time. Any questions pertaining to the review of this site plan may be directed to James Lentini at (516) 360-6020. The permit fee and bond questions should be dire ct ed to me. Sincerely, VITO F. LENA Regional Permit Engineer cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz\l' VFL:JL:BT At tachment . . 9dJ[1LE' If; r:J ,eK-- U January 2, 1991 Mr. Louis DeRande 16 Victoria Drive Amityville, NY 11701 Dear Mr. DeRonde: Our Case H 90-425 Tartan Oil Co. Hobil Service Station Route 25, Hattituck Your December 4, 1990 Submission This is in reference to the site plans for the above noted project which were submitted to this office for review. Prior to the issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. Install 5 foot wide 18IIIIIUt offset 5 feet from face of curb full frontage of site. Install ~between curb and sidewalk. 2. Existing curbed radius at Uaratooka Lane LlUSt be replaced. '1t"'n'~ <l@1I., .. "JIIilIII~ '1lt!"'''tfti!l!M'fMi'''Wt-. Sunset Avenue and Usratooka Lane. Dimension radius on plans. 'li,",u 'lI.lIUI~Ji'rMI~I;lIl1'~lI.V' 3. ::e y~~~lip%n~le shown at.:l:.~atooka ~a~im;;_~~~~;;~',Pll~fi~~. ~-"... ' 4. The concrete apron for the curb ClltS "lUst be 8 inches thick, ,intI j'. Ji~,.,.a i ....lJ&ik",',if"!lret "'lYlf !g~l\ .... "'8_",~.,~~Ji.h,,4~. This is necessa ry to acca>oodate delivery vehicles entering the site. Show this detail on the plans. 5. Propo8ecLl;'~,~,_&4W'. '-'-"'JoTT i.n~t..1Qrf-~d'}V~iI9~A1rL't~111l~M~-r,n Lall". The westerly curb cut must be offset A~_r:'l"n.r~u.- "'1.;~.:''''448JJ,t::J..~'~>''''ftltl~ "'o$-8m~...",W'ij=~m. Provide the same offset for the curb cut on Sunset Avenue. , ',.. - lN1II :.S,C"~! . . 11r. Loui s DeRonde Page 2 January 2, 1991 6. ,1lll!t~1!'l!!'_' 1I1lIl!@'\C'.'tiW.It.....,.~'iMd.. sign on Sunset Lane. All 3i"n3 must be reflectorized and a note stating same ShO~l on the plans. 7. __1If'!'J!lIIi!eMiiW'l'!ih''M~'':be~"..tm!' t:we' /'I'!'~S~'~ "ctllPs. Attached for your use is a marked set of plans. ~i(.:~l~~;';~ "be identified '" ' , case number. Failure to provide this the processing of your permi t. as revisions and Dust information will delay Prior to issuance of a Highway \/ork Pemit you must submit four sets of the revised plans, permit fee, surety bond (sample enclosed) and a completed protective liability insurance form (PERi'l 17 enclosed). You must comply ,lith Option A of this form. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"): Not applicable at this time. Bond Anount: Not applicable at this time. Any questions pertaining to the review of this site plan may be directed to James Lentini at (516) 360-6020. The permit fee and bond questions should be directed to me. Sincerely, VI TO F. LElIA Regional Permit Engineer cc: Hs. Valerie scopaz-/ VFL:JL:BT At tachment . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennell Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Matthew Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Board of Appeals Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman ;($.0.1"-Itl5 December 24, 1990 FROM: DATE: RE: Tartan Oil Corporation SCTM# 1000-115-3-9 The Tartan Oil Company plans to install a microwave oven in its store in Mattituck. It proposes to offer soup, canned and frozen food, pasta and other types of groceries. The site plan shows a drive up window for the store. The Planning Board would like your opinion, in writing, as to whether this business is a drive in restaurant, fast food restaurant or retail food shop. ( ( L , PLANNING BOARD . 11 DECEM. 3, 1990 Ayes: Mr. Edwards, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Ward. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. **************************************** APPROVAL OF PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Board to approve the November 16, 1990 minutes from a special meeting. Mr. Edwards: So moved. Mr. Ward: r,econd. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. **************************************** OTHER: Mr. Orlowski: Tartan Oil in Mattituck. You scheduled an appointment with us to discuss your site plan. Mr. William Moore: We would like to listen to what you have to tell us. Mr. Orlowski: I think we wrote it all out. Mr. Moore: Well, we've got some problems with how to comply with it and we would like to talk about it. You're letter of June the 8th. The first three items obviously we can respond to that. The fourth one, I would like to clarify that. On the curbing around the property, I assume you are referring to the improved area not back along the ---_. Mr. Orlowski: The improved area? Mr. Moore: Well, the paved area. I know it is a stupid question but I just wanted to make sure. The real problem that I see is the curb cut and I told Bob and I know similar situations faced the board, the Sunoco station and I think they ended up kind of conceding to your desire to have a single curb cut on 25. We are still asking for two and I brought Lou to try and explain why this site and the way the tanks and everything else would justify two on 25. ( ( c PLANNING BOARD . 12 DECEme 3, 1990 Lou DeRonde: I would just like to say that I'm not a traffic expert, I'm a Civil engineer but I'm not an expertise in traffic. However, I made a phone call today to the State of New York over in Happaugue and just discussed this. They have not seen this plan because each plan stands on its own merit but generally speaking the state would approve with this frontage of 201 feet, they would approve possibly two 35 foot curb cuts or two 30 foot curb cuts. A certain distance in from the corners because of the curb radius and they felt that this was something that is practical for a location like this. It is accepted as a industry standard and the State preliminarily does not have a problem with it. I know the town is aSking for a single curb cut here but that in itself has some complications in as much as after riding by the site tonight I found that as we proceed East on Route 25 there is a right hand curb as you are going towards the sp.rvice station. That is further complicated by the fact that there is a down grade right in front of the service station. So ingress and egress out of the service station becomes difficult.as you approach the easterly side of the service station so it is to the benefit to have the ramp in towards the westerly end of the curb cut for ingress, not only for customers but also for the tractor trailer that must deliver fuel to these tanks that were just recently installed towards the rear of the property. The fills on these tanks are at the northerly end and the tank wagon must come in and he has to swing in and he has to park because all these tanks have a right hand delivery so all the apparatus for deliveries are on the right side of the truck which is limiting in itself but then the truck would exit presently, correct me Barry, the truck exits behind the service station on to Maratooka where he will make a left hand turn and proceed west back to his terminal. We would prefer to have the two curb cuts because it lends itself much better to traffic flow on the service station not withstanding what I just said about visibility on 25 to the west leaving the service station. It is rather difficult. It would be more beneficial to have the curb cut placed at the westerly end of the curb cut, at the property, excuse me for egressing for someone who was going to continue west just for visibility sake and of course those who would continue east would exit on the easterly curb cut but normally speaking in situations like this and it has been a industry practice to put in two curb cuts. If you were dealing with a hundred foot frontage here we would be limited to single curb cuts but with this type of frontage it seems practical to ask for two curb cuts. Mr. Orlowski: Does the board have any questions? Mr. McDonald: You haven't shown the curb continuing down either Maratooka Lane or Central Avenue so are you planning to do away with those curb cuts in those roads as well? Lou DeRonde: I think that Tartan oil would like to have a single curb cut on Sunset and a single curb cut on Maratooka. PLANNING BOARD . 13 DECEM~ 3, 1990 r Mr. McDonald: So you are going to have four potential entrances and exits onto this property. Lou DeRonde: That is correct. Mr. McDonald: It is still you intention (inaudible) Lou DeRonde: Number four curbing. I think the intent was to extend the curbing down to where the unimproved area begins. The wooded area runs from the easterly side approximately 70 feet back and approximately 50 feet back on Sunset and the curbing will be brought up to that point. Mr. Ward: What were the width of the curb cuts proposed for the two side streets? Mr'. Moore: I think thirty feet would be sufficient. The distinction, or one of them, with this Sunoco station is they are on a two corners, of Main Road and Factory. You get problems and difficulties with three roads surrounding properties. ( Mr. McDonald: I think that was part of what we were thinking about, because there were two existing roads on each side of that, rather than create more confusion by having multiple entrances and exits on Route 25, that we would utilize the roads that are existing already to make sure that we had fewer access points to that state road. I'm a little uncertain about what you are talking about the visibility there cause it is not bad. Bill Moore: If you come off the site and is surprising because the curb is there. the site you can see it. you want to go west it If you go and visit Mr. McDonald: The curb is what, about three hundred feet down the road? Bill Moore: Probably. c Lou DeRonde: You know the growth comes right out to the edge of the shoulder of the road. Actually, the growth comes out within the state right-of-way because there is some vacant property to the west of the service station. As I can see tonight, and as you come around there it is approximately perhaps two or three hundred yards before you can see the service station which you don't see, you see the brand sign where it is on the corner. If the brand sign were not in the position that it was in you wouldn't be able to see the service' station going east until you were actually going past it and that with the combination with the down grading presents this Visibility problem. We have found that if you have good on- site traffic patterns it lends itself not only to safety on the egress and ingressing but it presents a much better traffic flow and since this is in the local community most people will PLANNING BOARD . . 14 DECE~ 3, 1990 ( distinguish that and after a while the whole thing w~ll kind of blend itself and people become knowledgeable how to lngress ~nd egress here but of course the main traffic flow for the serVlce station is going to be not coming off Sunset or Maratooka, his main business is coming off of 25 so that is where you have to put your play. Mr. Ward: Well, if we considered the two on State 25, my . feeling is that I would want to see any curb cuts o~ the slde. roads to be as far south as possible. I don't partlcularly llke this cut as close as it is, it is just not good the way it is now. Lou DeRonde: Well, the state indicated what they, perhaps you know this also, but they also have jurisdiction as far as entering State roads off of town roads S0 the State is not going to' permit a curb cut that is too close to the corner. Mr. Orlowski: Do you have a letter from the State on any of this? Lou DeRonde: No, just some phone conversations today. They suggested that what we do is submit the plan to them and they will send a field inspector out and they will look at the property and then make a recommendation to Tartan Oil what the State feels will be adequate. ( Mr. Orlowski: Does the board have any other questions on this? Mr. Latham: What is your plan for the natural woodland area? Mr. Moore: Leave it the way it is in its natural state. This will bring us to the number six point in the letter. The landscaping plan, in strictly meeting the code, has the landscaping across the front of the property. Inthis zone it would be 25 foot deep and five feet across the front. We're running into problems with this site. It happens all the time when you get the existing site now trying to comply with the new rule book and sometimes you physically can't do it. If you look at the code, and if I'm reading the code correctly, a 25 foot deep buffer across the front yard and then scale out the property you are into and beyond the first existing pump island so if you are coming up with a landscape plan, I think that is partly why we are also here tonight to discuss that because we have a large wooded area in the back. To what extent you want or will require landscaping to the front of the property I think we will have to discuss. Mr. Ward: I think our feeling is that whatever you don't need as pavement gets planted. c Mr. MCDonald: I don't have the background I guess everybody else does. What I'm seeing in front of me, is this proposed or PLANNING BOARD . 15 DECEM~ 3, 1990 ( is that pretty much there? This aren't that close to the road presently are they? Mr. Moore: Those pumps are where they are. Mr. McDonald: That is eXisting as is. Mr. Moore: We got yelled at at one point blacktopping, in fact we got yelled at a few times. In fact that has always been a massive asphalt or blacktop in one fashion good, bad or broken up otherwise and when it came in and it was all blacktopped it looked like we had come in and somehow schewed allover everything which just wasn't the case. That's how it was and nothing was being changed at that point. Mr. McDonald: I think I would agree with Dick that by asking for this and where you can't comply with the code it can't be done. We're aSking to see your plan and what you want to do. Keeping in mind the variables in the code that you think you can comply with. I don't think we would necessarily hold you strictly to it if it can't be held to. ( Mr. Ward: For instance, if you get a line out here between the curb cuts, you can have a big island in here landscaped and a big island on the corner. I don't know why this is set up here, why it isn't pushed back further or more on site. I don't know, you could do a lot to dress this site plan up besides street trees. You could get some low bed plantings in here. You know the whole front here other than whatever curb cuts we finally agree on could be all planted. It will be ten foot deep instead of twentY-five. Mr. Latham: Is that telephone gone now? Mr. Moore: No, that pole is still there. About the sign, I don't know if we need to go to the Zoning Board? Mr. Ward: In the spirit of what we are looking for, where we can, do corners. You know you've got your sign and other things in there and here is where we've asked for the one curb cut. We would like to take advantage of places like this where we can get some low plantings in and plant some street trees. Lou DeRonde: I would just like to point out to you, you see that their layout is a bit different, it is more condusive to one layout. They have islands that are not parallel to the street. They have what they call the classic drive in islands and this is more conducive to a single curb cut than we have parallel lines that are already in existence. c Mr. Ward: If we are going to consider the two curb cuts on 25 and if the state will approve it and you want us to consider it then we would definitely want to see these curb cuts as far south as possible. . PLANNING BOARD . 16 DECE43, 1990 ( Mr. Moore: The ones on the side roads. Mr. Ward: And large planted islands in the corners and planting across the front, street trees. Lou DeRonde: If I can make a suggestion perhaps we can present this in the State of New York now within the next few days. I don't know how they are going to be about coming out and inspecting it might take several weeks or something but they will send out their recommendations and/or they will issue a permit on this and then we can come back with that information at some point and time and present it back to the board. Then we can resolve that at least. Mr. Orlowski: Before you go the State has Well, that would be a good place to start. on it would be good to come back to us with what given to you in writing. Mr. McDonald: Under the assumption that if they grant you a permit it doesn't necessarily mean that we are going to agree. Mr. Moore: From a layman's standpoint, I had real concerns about a single curb cut on 25. Whether you put it to the east or to the west, whichever way you want to go back out of the property doing a very sharp U-turn either to go east or to go west depending on where you put it. ( Mr. Ward: The only thing is, I thought that the side streets were usable. Mr. McDonald: The other problem is for people who don't know how to get in who are coming from the east going west. If you don't know it and you are going to pull into this gas station you wouldn't know enough to go into Maratooka, you would be by it. Ken Edwards: That is exactly what he said, most of the traffic is going to be coming off of 25. Mr. McDonald: The westward traffic doesn't have a problem, if they are going to entrance, they are going to enter here. It's fine, it is from the other direction. Mr. Orlowski: We had Sunoco do a traffic study. Have you done anything like that? Lou DeRonde: No, I don't think there has been a traffic study done. Mr. MCDonald: Do you see Sunset being used very much? Do you envision your tanker coming in through there to come in? ~ Lou DeRonde: I believe they do, yes. PLANNING BOARD . 17 DECE~ 3, 1990 ( Mr. Orlowski: You won't be able to get behind that building anymore will you? Mr. McDonald: Is this the plan that we have in our files right now? Mr. Moore: Yes. Mr. McDonald: You're going to come down with other modifications as well. The canopy mayor may not be there? Mr. Moore: We would like to have the canopy there, the goal is we are trying to sell a gallon of milk, bread, etc.. A drive-in window. Mr. McDonald: Does he have to go to the ZBA for this? Mr. Moore: I would like to keep my list to a minimum. Mr. McDonald: I'm only thinking what's -- this is now a fast food establishment. ( Mr. Moore: I will go back and review the zoning code and make recommendations to my client as to the feasibility or wisdom of that idea. The question I guess I have got for ourselves is, if you move those curb cuts back along the property would that tanker still use them. Then he is doing a right hand turn up Sunset and back along the property. Lou DeRonde: Obviously, its going to put you back into the wooded area. Mr. Moore: There is a minimum distance that you want to be. Mr. Orlowski: This tanker is going to fill up and go behind this station to get out then. Lou DeRonde: I brought along a standard, you can lay this over your site plan. You see the truck will come in. This is the same scale as the site plan and it is a right hand drop so it is actually like this. The wagon comes in, I believe as Barry was saying, it comes in over here and it will lay in here something like this. Presently, because the fills are in the front here, there's four tanks here, he probably lays pretty much parallel because these hose's are afixedand he probably parks something maybe in this fashion so he doesn't have to move the truck when he makes a delivery which is becoming a no, no these days. Mr. Orlowski: Are you figuring on taking him out this way then? L PLANNING BOARD . . 18 DECE13, 1990 ( Lou DeRonde: I believe what he does now is he just continues out here and he comes out on Maratooka and then continues back to the terminal. Mr. Orlowski: It suppose to be a very high canopy. Lou DeRonde: Well, this canopy appears to be the same as your standard bridge clearance at least 14 feet if it were approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Orlowski: The sign says "Under New Management". Is that affecting this in any way? Mr. Moore: No, because that is a tenant of Barry's. Mr. Orlowski: Oh, O.K, J: noticed it was closed then if opened again. Mr. McDonald: Do ,au ~o~e q~ro3s this way then? \ Lou DeRonde: The edge is behind the service station now and if you can envision.... Mr. Ward: How does he come in? ( Lou DeRonde: He comes in off of Sunset. He comes in across the corner here and pulls in parallel. If there is a curb cut of sufficient size a 25 a 35 foot curb cut, that size truck can negotiate that turn. Mr. Ward: So you may be able to eliminate the one on this size. Mr. Latham: You mentioned 35 a couple of times rather than 30. Lou DeRonde: Well again, it is up to the state. The state has been giving out some 30's. They will not give out two forty foot curb cuts in any instance. In most instances they have been giving 30 to 35 depending on the site. Allan was just saying with Mobile, this is an 85 hundred gallon truck, but the brand of the station is Mobile and he neglected to say is that Mobile has gone to larger tank wagons and you have probably seen them. They are 12,000 gallons which are some seven feet longer so we do need more room to negotiate turns. The quicker you get the truck off the road the less hazardous it is. They always come to a stop before they enter and the laws the way they are Changing today you know these fellows are not allowed to back up and you know it is a whole different ballgame then it was just a few years ago because of environmental problems. Mr. Latham: The trucks get larger and larger all the time. L PLANNING BOARD . . 19 DECE13, 1990 ( Lou: We can remember not fills right on the street into the filling station. that long ago they used to put the so the truck didn't even have to come You don't see that today. Mr. Moore: Any other comments or suggestions? Mr. Orlowski: Valerie, do you want to make a comment? Ms. Scopaz: I would just like to make a suggestion that in the traffic study that you itemize and look at the whole situation of two curb cuts. The reason is that on two other gas stations on 25, the board has asked the gas station to go down to reduce the two existing curb cuts down to one. Mr. Moore: Which was the other one, I'm just cu~ious? Ms'. Scopaz: Hess gas station. They are coming in with a similar type canopy proposal and we have asked for the same thing. Landscaping and going down to one curb cut, the same as on the Sunoco site plan. So if we are asking for a traffic study that you detail the projected traffic flow taking into account Sunset Lane, Maratooka Lane and two curb cuts from the traffic sector point of view. Mr. McDonald: We haven't actually asked for that. ( Ms. Scopaz: I'm making the suggestion that if you do that, I think that should be taken into consideration. Lou DeRonde: The Sunoco station. When the islands are perpendicular to the street the turning radius of getting out, these minimum turning radius for vehicles would probably in most instances, I don't know which came first the chicken or the egg here, was there a different layout first that they had two curb cuts that the islands were parallel to 25 or did they come in initially with these perpendicular islands for 25. Mr. Moore: The Sunoco is presently parallel. Melissa: Right. Lou DeRonde: Now they are but on the proposed site plan they are perpendicular because they wouldn't have an option to getting back on to 25 even if there were another curb cut. They would have no choice but to exit onto Factory Avenue. I don't think that is a controlled intersection. In fact, I know there isn't a light there. Lou DeRonde: You can imagine some of these service stations in Manhattan, they have trucks that are just dedicated to one service station. l Mr. Moore: I think if I can just make one clarification for ourselves on the landscaping plan. The street trees provide , . PLANNING BOARD . . 20 DECEM. 3, 1990 ( problems for us and I understand the ideas of the corners and curb cuts and the low growth ideas make sense that we start creating visibility problems for intersections and street trees because I'm not sure where we are headed. Mr. McDonald: We'll go down there and take a look at it. We are gOing to want some street trees, certainly there are some places where the street trees can go in here. Just for your own information, we want the lighting contained on the site, we don't want another Mobile station like on the North Road where we have to fight and fight over the lighting on that. It is not because anybody is right or wrong its just that's the way it was. In the middle of the night I don't want light glaring. Mr. Moore: ThanV you for your time. Mr. Lou DeRonde: Just a conclusion, I just spoke to Barry and he would be agreeable about your concern about lighting. Perhaps as we landscape these corners, assuming that they did get two curb cuts and the board would approve two, low level lighting could be employed at the entrances that wouldn't be offensive to any neighbors or anyone else and it could be done very, very effectively with the correct landscaping. It could be quite handsome. Mr. McDonald: We would appreciate anything you would like to do. ~ Mr. Orlowski: I'll entertain a motion to adjourn. Mr. Ward: Second. Mr. Orlowski: All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Orlowski: So ordered. Being there was no further business to come before the board the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m.. l Respectfully submitted, r7~' IZ~ Jane Rousseau, ~ . 0L{ tIi c..e:- i(k.. 16 MOORE & MOORE Attorneys at Law Clause Commons Suite 3 Main Road P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 Tel: (516) 298-5674 Fax: (516) 298-5664 William D. Moore Patricia C. Moore Margaret Rutkowski Secretary November 12, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Tartan Oil / Mattituck Dear Chairman Orlowski and Members of the Board: This is to confirm our meeting on December 3, 1990 at 7:30 pm to discuss the proposed site plan for the Mattituck Mobil station. I will have an engineer from Tartan Oil with me to discuss various elements of the proposed layout to see if some agreement can be reached with the Board. WDM/mr cc: Tartan Oil Corp. _ \ Ii ~ ~ Stlffiif ~~ J tv,:), ,7 ~<; . MOORE & MOORE Attorneys at Law Clause Commons Suite 3 Main Road P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 Tel: (516) 298.5674 Fax: (516) 298.5664 William D. Moore Patricia C. Moore Margaret Rutkowski Secretary November 5, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Tartan Oil / Mattituck Dear Chairman Orlowski and Members of the Board: Please accept this letter as a request made on behalf of Tartan Oil for an informal meeting for discussion with the Planning Board regarding the proposed site plan for the Mattituck Mobil station. I intend to have an engineer from Tartan Oil with me to discuss various elements of the proposed layout to see if some agreement can be reached with the Board. Please advise if you have time for such a discussion at your meeting of November 13th. Very truly yours, N~LJ.M~ William D. Moore WDM/mr cc: Tartan Oil Corp. tIJ\I (l re .ANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G . Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 June 8, 1990 William D. Moore Suite 3 Clause Conunons Main Road Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Tartan Oil Site Plan Southwest corner of State Rte. 25 and Sunset Avenue, Mattituck SCTM*1000-115-3-9 Dear Mr. Moore: The Planing Board has reviewed the revised map dated April 18, 1990. The following changes must be made before the Board can proceed with its review. 1. Drainage plan and calculations must be shown. 2. Parking calculations must be shown, including handicapped parking. 3. An enlarged diagram of the floor plan showing all uses must be provided. 4. Curbing must be installed around the entire property. If One curb cut must be provided on Marratooka Road. T re is Sunset Lane. The curb cu arratooka be ~oca~ed away from the intersection. Jf 6. A landscaping plan must be provided. Street trees must be provided on Route 25, Marratooka Lane and Sunset Avenue. ., . . . MOORE & MOORE Attorneys at Law Clause Commons Suite 3 Main Road P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 Tel: (516) 298-5674 Fax: (516) 298-5664 William D. Moore Patricia C. Moore Margaret Rutkowski Secretary May 15, 1990 Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Tartan Oil / Mattituck Dear Members of the Board: Enclosed please find one (1) print of the proposed site plan for the Mattituck Mobil station. Also enclosed is a copy of the stipulation of settlement of the legal proceedings between Tartan Oil Corp. and the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Please advise if you would like me to meet with one of your staff members before appearing before the Board. r:!trulYYO~ Ji~lD..oo" WDM/mr Encls. - "~~-~, (~'\ '\ \J '1 ,-, \\ ',; "',', , ~ ,- ~J~ ffi 1i''' ~,.I ' . . Page 2 Tarton Oil 7. The free standing sign must be twentY-five (25) feet from the front and/or rear property line. The maximum height of such sign shall be fifteen (15) feet. 9. The total area of the property must be shown. 8. Percent (%) lot coverage and landscaping must be shown. 10. A lighting plan must be shown. All lighting must be shielded from adjoining properties. A copy of your letter to the Planring Board dated January 11, 1989 confirming many of the above items is enclosed for your reference. In addition to the above, consideration should be given to relocating the parking in front of the underground storage tanks to facilitate the delivery of fuel. If you have any questions or require further assistance please contact this office. Very truly yours, ~~/p~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~ Chairman Encl. '. . . .() .r ........... ..... ""''''TTITUCIIt. .....Ir"" VO.... I '''~~ ., . -. Facsimile: (516) 298-5664 '.:5, 6J 29B-5674 "- Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road SouthOld, New York 11971 Attention: Melissa January 11, 1989 Dear Melissa: Re: Tartan Oil / Mattituck In confirmation of our conversation in respect to the Mobil gas station in Mattituck, it is my understanding that the Planning board Wants Tartan Oil, Corp. to have a site plan indicating curbing to be installed around the property With one CUrb cut on Marratooka Road and one curb cut on State Route 25. There is to be no curb cut on Sunset Lane. In addition the site plan should show proposed landscaping and a drainage plan which should include the calculations required by the Town Ordinance. Lastly, they would like an enlarged diagram of the floor plan together with the parking calcUlations to insure th~t there ~s a proper amount of parking Spaces provided based upon the use to which the property is being put. "Very truly yours, ww'~\b WDM\kts cc: Barry Tallering, President M,.. ::'I"" ..._... . .. WILLIAM O. MOORE PATRICIA C. MOORE KAREN SZCZOTKA, SeCRETARY MOORE Be MOORE :'1, ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 3 CLAUSe COMMONS MAIN ROAD P.O. Box 23 MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952 (516) 298-5674 FACSIMILE (516) 298-5664 )1\1 I 9 /989 June 16, 1989 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Melissa , Re: Tartan Oil/Peconic Mobil Tartan Oil/Mattituck Mobil Dear Melissa: Please have an inspection of the Tartan Oil/Peconic Mobil property. The light shields requested by the Planning Board have all been installed. I understand that this was the final item required by the Planning Board before a Certificate of Occupancy would be issued. Please advise me of the status of the review of the site plan submitted for the Mattituck station. Also, please advise if you would like the applicant's engineer to discuss the developments of the site plan design as he has proposed it. Thank you for your attention to these matters. Very truly C1QQ yours, Moore WDM\kts cc: Tartan Oil Corporation . . 1 -~>,- , \ '", ... ROAD MAIN z.QI,a'Z. &3".o\-O'OO'E., N, ;; In '" In OJ N '" III W 00 :) In Z W > <r w 2 <C ..J ,I ?: o N N N . - I/) w , 0 N , N N . - . z <( ~ o o I- <C ri. r1. <! 2 f- w V) z :> t/) N.sa"37'40"W. - Z.OO.O CE:OIi:.IC H.' WICKHAM ~~,s' "US' MAP OF PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR MARRATOOKA CORPORATION " , SITUATE AT r-' />..4 r ( ,f" -, f) ) ~v I ofr/ MATTITUCK SUFFOLK CO., N. Y. ~- 6UA2ANTEEO TO TITLE GUARANTEE If. -ro:UST' CO.. AS SUR....e:VEO JUNE: 8,19S, ";S- . OTTO W. VAN TUYL 'ct SON 2.. V~ '1~ LICENSEO L^,.Jo SU2.VEYORS GRe:e:OlP02.T. N. '(. SCALE: 60' = /" o = l~ON PIPE iJ = GRAN, 0"- CONC.. MON. .411 '" 0 ([)\1 -4r. TITLE No. '~J~~~) , ' .' .'----..-----. ";,:.:~----"---"- ~io:'~,~-" '0' :- ;)1.,\"", 'I .. " ' \- C," f " .-> , / 1.1 ~jJQ\+ f'j ~ .~ ' ;~ '- " I C1:r'l ~~\'- d~ ~ -- -,;;; ')\ , ~ ."~' ..,. / ----- ().u ~ ~ o. r,.7--0 ~ 11.4'"\ ~ :Ji ,1 '10ALJ5 - ~: ~~!u f~~ ~~ rlUrl ' ~~~q.' 1\5 -3-1 (' I QS1)'s - (d)~~ '7();~ 'g() ~ J J -)~) """'" Y'l(l ,~ ..,J',,"._ ~;; --- ..-- 'o:y-_ ._ ~ - ,--- ~ --- . ~ -- ATTORNEYS AT LAW . w ~~ ~7n~ ~i@i jL;i , I SOUTHOLD TOWN PlANNING BOARD WILLIAM D. MOORE PATRICIA C. MOORE '" MOORE Be MOORE SUITE 3 CLAUSE COMMONS MAIN ROAD P.O. Box 23 MATTITUCK. NEW YORK 11952 (516) 298-5674 Facsimile: (516) 298-5664 February 16, 1989 Southold Town Southold Town Main Road Southold, New Planning Board Hall York 11971 Re: Tartan Oil/Mattituck Mobil Dear Mr. Orlowski and Members of the Board: Enclosed please find six (6) copies of the proposed site plan for Tartan Oil Corporation/Matti tuck Mobil operation. Site plan as amended January 30, 1989. Please advise of a time that I may meet with the Board or its staff members to explain the proposed site plan. Thank you for your cooperation. ours, WDM\kts enclosures cc: Tartan Oil Corporation (w/o enclosures) Joel Joesph, Esq. (w/o enclosures) c .- Ve.ICe:.. 01 :uJ ).,. .J '<11-11 _' I ~ - ~l , - Go" ~I o , 'Of c.: tZA (.:;. E" J " _I.J?',':;.=7;;~~~-_:~~~T==_~. r.r;>, ~ Fl/.ICE fr,;.,J ELI!;......""....) '/4""-0' --~..=::;-=..--:':==-- '/4'0 ,'.",. . . // r/'7:.'.~r..?~N~--CC.--.70N'-V.S.~~:o.r. R.... id~-:';' L/J-. M,l/Ad /otj:,;V~'Af.o~e;;;~;rj-e.C!...-;;;; .:.,:.,;;Cy;,:..j--.-....- iZ. ~. '9 ""4~ O(;d ..e64'A' CaM1.....y <5 ~.4 CO/UlECT/.:JOa. ~ .r6".tA.V(;~ 7. -M2 ~ ~~ C.C, CJA/ $/(JE ~ . ~ 3/:Yfr. ~~ ~ e $k'i!:C ~. .5 t -f;. 4f>N9l-o......,j oj. P""ViC (It' ............... 4. I.~. A~-c....,~,C..ui6~.,i. .''''s-,-o.i~o.-' 3 11.10-.' ~:::.z,~~~u-., ~"II..t"':.-CHt.~""~~f~.!"'n. ":._ :.<.I:: ~~~. M~6 Mq/.) w!lA -\- L,d L.t> .L~ ~.IJ . ~rf ..'-..,. ~. ....,.u"..~6 r-.')o -,_,?~.p~-..'f ~c""H1I.O .1 . ~" "!l0. 4FfI4~' ':i i B'I'.. ;'P'VD. 2 7'~f'8"" C~ ~LTlIJ. AQ'~9.'lZ6I.Pw...TOw'" e'dA&O l.12'81 12..1..o<.A..... ~ .".""..... flu....,. . . "1 NO DAlE REVISIONS TAX MAP Sic 1000 ~C,IIS 13t....:::. '3 I..oT'" %oq€, e.'l\v~. ~ -.'.... p, ,h." 1~1'1) T;.Q.TA......) Ol~.. (ClC.POQ.A'T"IO~ "7 Po. ~"><' 101, (Iso ~-..Ik....DW e..) TITLE ~ " - , . ~, Ml!i:Lv.......'r J.J.'f"'",1...~.;t p",,,, paS 5.0 c...,,~ I.., rIA...1.. 4 T'/"...)' 12T'E.. 2 s- 5, TS-. . KAJ &;r. "1A2lZAT"'''~ LA. ~ SWlli'T" A~E.. ',' ". . ",~~,,-,_.~. .' '" . "':'-'>"":.'-" . ;,<-.,:~;::,:,;:'F,<'r:- .';; .. - '., -;",,*,.:~ M4TT'lT\.l'~,..'~y,,/ y . '. "~ /f~:;;:[::~';~~St,';1 GF'SCHAE~F-Nai ~.;-' 2 0 RO - ~ . <', .... 11 H WA AVE.' - ,. ..~ ~'" MIDOLESEXN.J. 08846' 20(356-5188 . '.' ,"..... ..t ,.:~~;:' ...~~ '"-',,-.,, lD)~rn~owrn~ 11i11 FEH 1002 1[lIJ SOUTHOLO TOWN PlANNING BOARD PETROLEUM ASSOCIATES M.H. oeUTZMAN PE. 58 CHERRY LANE SMITHTOWN N.Y. 11787 516-265-2256 c;; .~~c..~!~~1~&,k-' OWN BV ~. F. S. CHK'D BV M. .t'. <- SCALE 4 $ .... T"e l:> . Q,t,TE 1.2.ale ORAWING NO ",....... :0;. ..,...-_~,.,:..- / _.. ._.,~.. !~ I .~ J" f\;; I V)/! ;,; I ':-;V,Q 4t II r.,'CU~ ~ I , '-- r -----1- . , - II \ ">~"\.;#'~) ,n::;, A-?.4. :) I /~I .c("./:".Lr' ",:,:,~.(l.E "'..~, ~1h,i~ :, ',:,';~lr"H"V$"\ I"'''' ". c ~A, .___1 /'-- ~=-C::...L~1C12 it; I... '__,. . ~, I I ~ -/ ~.! ~ ':\ , \)j ,,* L!.! / f~ ~I // I - I I ^ "c / I!I~'I J='~'~~~_L__'/~ , \' ~ . ;y '1t(} ;' .v '\, , ~ ''I'? E L Oc;,.t'J T.:: -1 /.? /_ /,/ ~ , ,,/' ~ A'G.r~€C7VR/ZL".() "y/ \! ~ I ' S/G/V. . -"/.fc,R4M,P _~!..:~ , TF:/ '72l""......j C>"..i :~ i: ~~ ;.,j;+ lo~. ~'" // I S'o 1>,''''4':> ~,: I II !bilt / Mew'l,-",- L'f ' I' ,/ rJf,.v C:><JC/\ ~.G' 42. '.30.30 i 'l' S'O/.J 'f i4~f', ,.or. '..-~ . , '''''04+'-:- /S-''''-~~'.'~ ~ 0G.J .'.~ - ......... '''-:'10. ''''0 ~~'. ("".:.r:;:~/''''Q_'",_:_ r;;i.;'\-)[J +< 4' Sn. t""'"! Pl....)!) r; t, 'o2.ls" Fi:"1t j7jyPotIw....J PaLl! khrtJ fyST"f''''I .>Je',<- I:"",,;' "--.:: - ;Uj~.." 1V)T'1'.. oj P.~.. "";};2'M'4:"''''-1 V4P~...... ~lo2. 3~ -- - '35-. 0- ..1:rrrAc:r<:., L,o.J"~ C'-<>o-e.) {,../ ~.y .~, - -" ~ . /DI.41. . " Re//V,.L"". Cove . /T' "-. , J. d' .' .~ . - ......' .., "-. ~. '; ", '; ~' - :;,- " ~ '" . . ~> .~;~,'f " ,',' ;':'_:~ti/~~'~:i..'~"'__' ".,' ".::';.~.;; ''''''''''''/ .< .~ v?1/0>"Lil~~~~z~~' " -- WILLIAM D. MOORE PATRICIA C. MOORE ~ .1 ATTORNIEYS AT LAW D ,---@ ~ a Wi ~.~~ ( .,;1, u1Ji' , I 3 /989 r I L L.,_~,l~:i,'~:!:,~~~U~::;~::?i~~<~-) MOORE & MOORE SUITE 3 CLAuse COMMONS MAIN ROAD P.O. Box 23 MATTITUCK, New YORK 11952 (516) 298-5674 Facsimile: (516) 298-5664 January 11, 1989 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Melissa Re: Tartan Oil / Mattituck Dear Melissa: In confirmation of our conversation in respect to the Mobil gas station in Mattituck, it is my understanding that the Planning board wants Tartan Oil, Corp. to have a site plan indicating curbing to be installed aro~nd the property with one curb cut on Marratooka Road and one curb cut on State Route 25. There is to be no curb cut on Sunset Lane. In addition the site plan should show proposed landscaping and a drainage plan which should include the calculations required by the Town Ordinance. Lastly, they would like an enlarged diagram of the floor plan together with the parking calculations to insure that there is a proper amount of parking spaces provided based upon the use to which the property is being put. Very truly yours, W~()~ WDM\kts cc: Barry Tallering, President . ~ MEMORANDml TO: Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Is RE: Appeals for Tartan Oil, Marratooka Lane, Mattituck DATE: February 18, 1988 With regard to the above-named appeals, I would like to make a few observations. First, the landowner currently enjoys a substantial bene- fit from being the only business-zoned property in the immediate neighborhoo<l. The proposed Master Plan zoning respects this business zone, even though the preservation of this business zone outside of the hamlet business district essentially contradicts one of the aims of the Master Plan, which is to prevent strip devel- opment on State Route 25. Second, the proposed intensification of use by the addition of an accessory retail use which bears no clear relationship to the gas station use raises other questions. For example, should a Special Exception use such as a gas station be allowed to have non-automotive retail accessory uses? Should the Town encourage the mixing of these two somewhat dis- parate uses on one site? One of the major reasons why many zoning codes have placed such specific restrictions on gasoline stations is the potentially hazardous nature of the use. If the proposed accessory use is allowed, where does one dwaw the line with regard to the nature of permitted retail uses? For instance, would a florist shop be an acceptable retail use? Or perhaps a fast food take-out shop? Will allowing the proposed retail use open the door to expanding that retail use beyond that specific use that is being requested tonight? If the newspaper- fast food-cigarette business doesn't do well, but the video ren- tal business does, how does one control the change from this type of retail to the other? Finally, it may be useful to reverse the question. If a retail shopping center, whether large or small, asked for per- mission to open a gas station as an access6ryuse, would you consider the request for the second use_as a strictly accessory use? Lack of time prohibits a more detailed analysis. If the Board so wishes, -however, I am willing to address these questions in greater depth. . . WILLIAM D. MOORE ATTORNEY AT LAW SUITE 3, CLAUSE COMMONS MAIN ROAD MATTITUCK. NEW YORK 1 1952 (516) 298-5674 January 6, 1988 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Valerie Scopaz Re: Tartan Oil Corp./ Mattituck Our File Number 161-87 Dear Valerie: Please advise on the status of the amended site plan submitted for the Mattituck Mobil Station on behalf of Tartan Oil Corporation. As I have offered before, I am prepared to meet with you at any time to discuss the nature of site improvements on this location. We would like to have this matter resolved promptly so that we may proceed with an application to the Zoning Board for partial self service at this site. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Wi~~~ Moore WDM:er cc: Barry Tallering Victor Lessard DocId:010688.3 ", RECEIVED E,y (, .", ,',. 'I ~.-. _I ,.,L 'Jj"" '" ',', "" .........1.", ,"._ .' , A ,..", J~ '';..1 ~ i- N 8}B88 . ~ 1~}4161 c:0rI--o WILLIAM D. MOORE ATTORNEY AT LAw SUITE 3. CLAUSE COMMONS MAIN ROAD MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952 (516) 298.5674 December 3, 1987 southo1d Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Valerie Scopaz Re: Tartan Oil/Mattituck Mobil Our File # 161-87 Dear Valerie: Enclosed please find four (4) prints of a site plan including the drainage calculations and the lot area as requested by you. AcCording to the engineers of Petroleum Associates 80% of the run off will be contained on the property. Approximately 20% of the run off would run into Marratooka Lane. The englneer proposes construction of a gully or swa1e along Marratooka inside the property line directing the water to the lower area of the property thereby retaining all runoff on the subject piece. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, ~ William D. Moore WDM:er cc:Tartan Oil Corp. DocId:120387.5 ... William D. Moore Attorney at Law Suite 3 Clause Connnons Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear . a,kt Mr. l'f&;re: ./ . Southold. N. Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 November 30, 1987 Re: Tartan Oil Co. S/w/c of State Route 25 and Marratooka Lane, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-115-3-9 After reviewing your letter of November 16th and the Ilrevised" site plan, 1 find the following information still missing: 1) Lot area 2) Drainage calculations Could you arrange to have this data sent to my office by Friday, December 4th in the morning? Sincerely, ih.L'1.-<--e'_~4'2e'~ Valerie Scopaz t7 t'./ Town Planner . . WILLIAM D. MOORE ATTORNEY AT LAW SUITE 3. CLAUSE COMMONS MAIN ROAD MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 1 1952 (516) 298-5674 November 16, 1987 Southo1d Town Planning Board Southo1d Town Hall Main Road Southo1d, New York 11971 Attn: Valerie scopaz " Re: Tartan Oi1/Mattituck Mobil SCTM # 1000-115-3-9 Dear Valerie: On behalf of Tartan Oil I am hereby resubmitting an application for site plan approval for the Mattituck Mobil Station located at the intersection of State Route 25 and Sunset Avenue. The original application dated August 4, 1987 was returned September 15, 1987 on the basis that it was incomplete. Enclosed please find four (4) copies of the amended site plan providing the information requested in your letter of September 15th, together with my check payable to the Southold Town Clerk in the sum of $100.00. Your letter of the 15th also included a checklist of items requesting additional information on the site plan being submitted. Among the information requested is the location and arrangement of the proposed means of access and egress including proposed curb cuts. It is not the intention of the owners to engage in a complete renovation of the site. Nor is it necesssary under the Southold Town Code for the applicant the to take a pre existing business and bring it into complete compliance with the ordinance. In light of the paving which was done on the property, the applicant is prepared to provide the necessary drainage to retain water on the site. In addition, there is a gap in the screening to the rear of the property which the applicant is also prepared to remedy with some plantings. The sole reason the applicant must submit a site plan lies in the fact that it has submitted an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals to permit partial self service of gasoline at the station. Such a use requires site plan approval. Simply because site plan approval is required by the code does not necessitate the full range of site improvements contemplated ntCEIVED BY S~,. i ,. TJ/','ij WiNNING BOARD t'ji,1j 17 19B7 'r: . . William D. Moore November 16, 1987 in the checklist provided in your letter of the 15th. I am prepared, at any time, to discuss the site improvements required with you, members of the Planning Board and members of the Building Department so that the specific site improvements required can be addressed and made properly by the applicant. Also enclosed is a check payable to Southold Town Clerk for $100.00 for the filing fee. Please place this matter on the Planning Board's next agenda. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, ~~ William D. Moore WDM:er encls cc: Tartan oil Corp. victor Lessard Docld 111687.2 . Q/J. Y!!Jyerd:J(\ 17, 1'1!!l7 (!/) OfpLi C2tw-n /Lf eJ'.~u * cLfLO ~ T D Southold, N, Y, 11971 (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman'; Board of Appeals ~~ Planning Board~'~ TO: Gerard Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning RE: Tartan Oil, SCTM# 1000-115-3-9 DATE: October 9, 1987 In response to your request the Planning Board reviewed the plans that were submitted in support of the application before your Board. The applicant does not have a site plan application before the Planning Board. The plan before the Zoning Board as stated in the enclosed letter, we have requested that the applicant submit a site plan showing the following items: 1. Designated curb cuts and curbing along S.R. 25 and Marratooka Lane. 2. Drainage calculations for on-site stormwater retention. 3. Landscaping along S.R. 25, Marratooka Lane and Sunset Avenue as well as on-site. 4. Designated parking spaces for the "proposed" convenience store, along with calculated parking needs based on the square footage of proposed retail use. . . D LD y Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 September 15, 1987 william D. Moore Suite 3 Clause Commons Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Tartan Oil Site Plan S/w/c/ State Rte 25 and Sunset Avenue Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-115-3-9 Dear Mr. Moore: The enclosed application for the above named site is being returned because it is incomplete. Attached to this application form is a listing of the missing items of information. Since the Planning Board has been asked to respond to the Zoning Board of Appeal's request for a recommendation on the two separate variance applications before them, please include the following information .with the application when it is resubmitted: 1. Floor plans showing location and area of proposed convenience store. 2. Parking requirements for proposed convenience store. 3. Proposed location of required parking. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact this office. Si5'cerely tI~~/.u? Valerie s~~ Town Planner -- cc: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Gerald Goehringher . Victor Lessard . T Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM TO: Gerard Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals ~~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman'; Planning Board?-f'W FROM: RE: Tartan Oil, SCTM# 1000-115-3-9 DATE: October 9, 1987 In response to your request the Planning Board reviewed the plans that were submitted in support of the application before your Board. The applicant does not have a site plan application before the Planning Board. The plan before the Zoning Board as stated in the enclosed letter, we have requested that the applicant submit a site plan showing the following items: ~ 1. Designated curb cuts and curbing along S.R. 25 and Marratooka Lane. 2. Drainage calculations for on-site stormwater retention. 3. Landscaping along S.R. 25, Marratooka Lane and Sunset Avenue as well as on-site. 4. Designated parking spaces for the "proposed" convenience store, along with calculated parking needs based on the square footage of proposed retail use. . . Soulhold. N,Y, 11971 (516) 765-1938 September 15, 1987 William D. Moore Suite 3 Clause Commons Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Tartan Oil Site Plan S/w/c/ State Rte 25 and Sunset Avenue Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-115-3-9 ------------- Dear Mr. Moore: The enclosed application for the above named site is being returned because it is incomplete. Attached to this application form is a listing of the missing items of information. Since the Planning Board has been asked to respond to the Zoning Board of Appeal's request for a recommendation on'the two separate variance applications before them, please include the following information with the application when it is resubmitted: 1. Floor plans showing location and area of proposed convenience store. 2. Parking requirements for proposed convenience store. 3. Proposed location of required parking. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact this office. SZ;~::~~ Valerie sc~.iJ Town Planner cc: Bennett Or lowski, Chairman' Gerald Goehringher Victor Lessard . . FILE COpy T LD Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Linda Kowalski, Secretary, ZBA FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner DATE: August 27, 1981 , , " ,)"" If " RE; Tartan Oil Site Plan at Mattituck )n 'J(], .. "I Please let this confirm that the Southold Town Planning Board is reviewing the above mentioned site plan, however, we will need more time to adequately review this and respond with our comments. We anticipate that we will have completed our review within the next 2 - 3 weeks, and will then'forward our comments to you. Thank you. . '. ". . . ALL SITE PLAN ELEMENTS ARE TO BE ON A SURVEY AT A SCALE OF a" = 20' AND STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, OR ARCHITECT. x-~~ SITE PLAN ELEMENTS 100-134 Town Code () Lot, block, and section number, if any, or the property taken from tax records ( ) Name and address of the owner of record ( ) Name and address of the person preparing the map ( ) Date, North arrow and written and graphic scale () Sufficient description or information to precisely define the boundaries of the property. All distances shall be in feet and tenths of a foot. All angles shall be given to the nearest ten seconds or closer. The error of closure shall not exceed on in ten thousand. ( ) The locations, name, and existing width of adjacent streets and curblines ( ) The location and owners of all adjoining lands, as shown on the latest tax records () Location, width and purpose of all existing and proposed easements, setback reservations, and areas dedicated to public use within or adjoining property. ( ) A complete outline of existing deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property ( ) ()If (x) ~ (x{ (X) C)<f Existing Zoning ~.~ Existing contoursAJft intervals of five or less, referred to a datum satisfactory to the Board Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater Location of existing watercourses, marshes, wooded areas, rock outcrops isolated trees with a diameter of eight inches or measured three feet above the base of the trunk and other significant existing features. Location of uses and outlines of structures, drawn to scale on and within one hundred (100) feet of the lots. Paved areas, sidewalks, and vehicular access between the site and public streets. Locations, dimensions, grades and flow direction of existing sewers, culve~nd waterlines as well as other underground and above ground utilities within and adjacent to the property. . . . . ~ . . Site plan elements cont. (100-134) ()() Other existing development, including fences, landscaping and screening ( ) The location of proposed buildings or structural improvement ~ The location and design of all uses not requiring structures such as off street parking and loading areas. ( ) The location, direction, power and time of use of any proposed outdoor lighting or public address systems. ( ) (x) (x) The location of, and plans for, any outdoor signs ~ The location and arrangement of proposed means of access and egres~~ including sidewalks, driveways or other paved areas; profiles indicating grading and cross sections showing width of roadway, location and width of sidewalks and location and size of water and sewer lines. Any proposed grading, screening and other landscaping including types and locations of proposed street trees. ()() The location of all proposed waterlines, valves and hydrants and of all sewer lines or alternate means of water supply and sewage disposal ." and treatment. ( ) (x) (0 ()O An outline of any proposed deed restriction and/or covenants. Any contemplated public improvements on or adjoining the property. If the site development plan indictes only a first stage, a supplementary plan shall indicate ultimate development. Any other information deemed by the Planning Board necessary to determine conformity of the site plan with the intent and regulations of this chapter. ~-~.f+. . 1-0000ccrrt..tr4.tff- - fZ>r lo~'=l/l~s) :s-h-u.c::n.u.e.s, lantdS!Pp'5 (," ft-. * ~ 'Sethd:. of CAr..oPY ~ "pn::periy" II~ 1<>/\ :s.R. ~s-: ?- ""b\"di......j- ca.lu..{.u-.:1>">lS fer- attrh:--:;;;rte... ~'1 {VvU -- "'-!:tIt....... -:::;; -- j . WILLIAM D. MOORE . ATTORNEY AT LAW SUITE 3, CLAUSE COMMONS MAIN ROAD MATTITUCK, New YORK 1 1952 (516) 298.5674 August 4, 1987 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Tartan Oil / Mattituck Mobil Gentlemen: Enclosed please located at Main with a check in find six (6) prints of a site plan for property Road and Marratooka Lane in Mattituck together the sum of $100.00 for filing. Please place this matter on the Board's next agenda. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, WLU~ William D. Moore RECEIVED BY S~T~~ T~W~ p~m BOARD DATE WDM:er enclosures cc: Zoning Board of Appeals Building Department Tartan oil Corp. DocId 080487.3 WILLIAM D. MOORE ATTORNEY AND COUNSELLOR AT LAW SUITE 3, CLAUSE COMMONS MAIN ROAD - P,O. BOX 23 MATTITUCK, N.Y. 11952 ADVICE 50-791/214 . 1005 PAY ON!; !/r/tvPttEP Ih/o C:O/n>> - DOLLARS EXPLANATION HECKAMC (X) :l F.I.C.A. FED. WITH ATE 8 c o NORTH FORK BANK SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 JfL(). ~ lI'OO~OOSIl' I:02~l,07CH21: lI'03~"'7781,S ~II' . . . 1'!1/1'1 ') 6 'Jtn t Southold Town'IBoarll of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD. L.I.. N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765.1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS fA'!";;..,>,?J ,;f;fr ~ """ .-;. ~(." GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN. JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI TO: FROM: Southold Town Planning Board and Town Planner Jerry Goehringer, ZBA Chairman DATE: SUBJECT: May 28, 1987 Planning Board Jurisdiction Matter of Tartan Oil Co. Locat1on of Property: Corner of Marratooka Lane and Main Road, Mattituck Zoning District: B-1 We presently have two applications pending concerning the above premises which is located in the "B-1" General Business Zoning District and more particularly shown on the attached survey. The applications involve both a Special Exception for partial self-service of gasoline and a Variance for a Convenience Store in conjunction with present gasoline services on less than one acre of land (Section 100-62). Since it is our policy to coordinate reviews when an application falls under both our jurisdictions, we would like to request your position at this time. As you know, the building is exist- i ng (except .:linr recent renovat ions, canopy addi t i on, new pumps, etc.), and a copy of the Certificate of Nonconforming Premises #Z14455 dated May 30, 1986 is attached for your consideration. We are in a position to schedule this matter for a public hearing and will need your input at this time, prior to the public hearingL if you feel Planning Board jurisdiction is appropriate. . It is our understanding that in the Matter of. Sukru Ilgin, a resolution was adopted by the Planning Board waiving jurisdiction for a similar(Variance)project. Thank you for your review in this matter. 1 k ~'(I\ ... u 'J\~ftJ \ --&--------- ( ~-- --- -- --- - I .. 1 :] t il .) ) ~ i I , i I -+ , , I ;1 I I ! ! i , I 1 I I I I t j ( (Y1 A i t-I r. -; RO,,-' ?/""';'. ,:1;:' ",. ~ -..... " Q '".;"0 .:<~~I..-- ...~- ----.{-:.! .---{~,,:.;.,... \J ~ ~ )- <l: ~ ~ .... ~ , " " -1 \.:r~r"'V','~ \~".;I""l"" t r- 40'! ~~ ~ ,I r.J . ~~ "' h 4J ~ 'I) ~ ;:) I !r) ! _: ~!J..:J~ N.e8W31'~o" N. zoo..:)o GUl+( f:e... evco\cs /v1,c,P Q,=- PkOP;;::P,'r~ .sURVE.yEC rC~ -" I LY :' ..-1.... P r--r-R rl --I 1",,1 = I V_t::..<.Jf 1'( CORP. Ai /"/1 A 7, / TUCt-<, SUF",c'Ct...K Ce.;, N. y, -- . <il"' I., 01 \,) ~ ..... ~ :z: <t ~ j\,'~ ~ ~ .;) ,"t ", ~t " tI)' '{ ~ ~ ~ f( ~ I I . . ~'::J,~--- i ; , I I I I: II , . I: Vi , J.lNAUTHORIZtD ALnJ^TJ~N OR AOOlTlO,.. TO TI-!l5 su;:vzy 15 A VICLATJON OF 51C7ICN 7LC9 OF ni~ NEW veRI; STAn EDUCATION LAW. cems OF n:iS SURVEY MAP NOT al:AR1N' THE lAl\C f:":..i:'{C:::'~ ;~~:~~o SEAL OR EMECSS::C SeAL ~~;A~l. .'::;1 &~ CONS10Eil.E' TO H A VA~jO i::l;~ C::?f. Cl!AIlAM::S ;~~::;:M:O ;':~r.:CN SHALL I1.U OMY jO r;.:: r..:::;,. ,;:;;: 'NI-:C.\\ 7tH SU IS ,;:E;.A,(t;, A..;; "::':l tj;5 ;';;IAlF TO THE TjTL~ c=..,\~^i.;Y, ui;Y~~;i.\!N(""l AetHey U:......j!.;G ',;$j;Tl:Tj':';~ l:Sr;;O 1~.Ii~OH, AN,- TO THi AS~:'JNCCS Cf Ti:E LEh01NG INSTI- TLTiCiL GUAIV'HJE~S A;:E NOT TllANSffll.: 1::1 .A.OOITIONAL r'-STfTUTlOh$ 01 $UUUJ ::W"'H!S. S'::~'i,-~: 6/1'- //1 0= ircr: pli=~ t :::: ;:::;"'-.;Jrl, O,...::.3rjc:.r.m:Jt'1. l._'/:'1t:;.J;':'i-/~::76C7 Gc..IC1r.;:Jr,r~~.:/ f-o T/t/c CLf.,ror)~::. CCr,'P'J''Y ;;1ssvl"v",/~d <.J't.II1~ JS;i:J70 VAN Thy/-.1;, SCN ,. ': -/.-'L.-. 1", A. '-4 /' u."r.7 Ir. ;'-:z. L \:'" ,Jj"<. . , L/~::rl.s;::.d L..r>.1 .eurv.:-"o,-.s ,. Cr~c<>rt, .N, ~ . _______.__________..___. I ''=C_ :( . FonM NO.3 ( . TOWN OF SOUTIIOL.D DUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CL.ERK'S OfFICE SOUTIIOL.D, N.Y. NOTICE OF D1SAPI'ROV AL. File No. ............................... Date. . ~. . .'. . . . . . .. . . . .. 19 . ~.1. To .W~...m~.X.y.~..~.~. ~~.~....d.l~.~..... ">:v.1,~.p,....,. ^':~". .l.J.~.~..~....... ~'l ~- ~-/"74 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your applicalion dated. .. Yr.].Q..A0. .!.7... . .. . .., 19.8]. . forpcnnit to construct .."'t. ~~.~... .l?1~.(.. .~..,t....,....................... al Location of Properly ....,...... .Irl.~ .-f.~.-I;...... ~.1~ !?~... .h1.~cA- 'House No. Strcot lI.Jm/tJ( Count;, Tax Map No, 1000 Section .....J /.:;;:. . . . . Dlock ..... <;'::l . ;3, . . . . Lol . 5? ~. . . . . . . . . I Subdivision. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '.' Filed Map No. ................ Lot No. ........ ... . . . . . . , is retllrned herewith Jnd disapproved on the followin!: grounds .~<;4'lJr ,~,~.'.~ ~ 7.D(~ ,S- ) r~~ '~h ~.~ .~~. .~F~ .4,~'1:~,~ '~'~'~'" ,~~A.l.ifI! 7 f9,;l.13 ~]-~. ~'l>!'\ .I).~~~,~. ~h' .\)l..~~.:.;u-~...................., ............................~...............:.......................... y;.~.cP~~........... Duilding Inspector nv Ileo J.EalVED ( TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ( '//}/J /"' . {P ;.lAY 13 iS87 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION Appl ication No. -..3 6..3 3 Date Filed: Town Clark SautI1nld TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK: I (We), of150 Broad Hollow Rd. (Residence, House No. and Street) Melville, NY c/o william D. Moore, Esq. Suite 3 ClaBBe Commons Mattituc (Hamlet, state, Zlp Code, Telephone Number) 298-5674 hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE VII , SECTION 100-70 , SUBSECTION b5 TARTAN OIL CORP. for the below-described property for the following uses and purposes (and as shown on the attached plan drawn to scale): partial self-service gasoline station "at Mobil station at Marratooka Lane and Main Road in Mattituck, NY A. Statement of Ownership and Interest. Tartan Oil Corp. property known and referred to as is(are) the owner(s) of M~rHO~~~nNkO~, TStn~et~Ha~f~t) Wn~r1 M::l..........i+-nt""'lr identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section ll~, Block :3 Lot(s) 9 , which is not (is) on a subdivision Map (Filed "Map of H Filed Map No. and has been approved by the Southold Town Planning Board on as a [Minor] [Major] Subdivision). The above-descri bed property was acqui red by the owner on 1 1 I, n /1 q 7? B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therefor in said ordinance and would not be d~tri~ental to prop.erty or persons in the neighborhood for the following reasons: S~te ~s presently improved by retail gasoline service station. The self-service aspect of such use will have no impact upon the surrounding neighborhood. Such a use is reflective of the demands of the public and the costs of gasoline and petroleum products. Self-service now accounts for more than 80 percent of petroleum sales. The proposed use will comply in all ways with the requirements of sections 100-70 b4 and 5 (see add'l pg.) The property which is the subject of this appl ication is zoned B-1 and C. L xJ L ] 15 consistent. wll.h Li:.::: 1J5E:(S} ~cs.::.r-~~(."': :i, the CCft~f~c~tc ',j7 0:c:.:;;ar'.:~~ tC~"':2 furnished herewith. is not cons is tent with the Cert i fi cate of Occupancy bei ng furni shed herewith for the following reason(s): sworn~to b for.e me this /IJfrjay /'~&-7 ~ (Nota' u l~) ZB2 (rev. 2/6/86) . iJJJ?iw-- of 1!1et; , 19!7. [ ] is vacant land. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) sS.: PATRICIA C. MOOItE NOTARY PUBLIC, 51.'e 01 New York No\ .01861668, s.uUa.....nty COlllm'U1<1n bPir.,.hI. 1988 . . . ....... , , . TARTAN OIL CORP. SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION PAGE 2 B. cont'd. to insure the safe and orderly use of the pro~erty. The proposed use will not adversely affect the health, safety, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town. The character of the use and development of uses in this zoning district will not be affected by the approval of partial self-service on this ~:::.:~~~t.~~w ~1,::":" ._~~ll ~~,.... ;7.....'"':''::',...-:).,.1 ,,~o "::'In'U"""r<:,,n1:" :;:d=-f"o("'t- :,rrq:')Art-,v VM.lll~~ ~ Partial self-service will not unduly increase vehicular traffic con- gestion. Nor will such a use have effect on the availability and adequacy of water and sewer resources. No additional parking demands will be created by the proposed use and there will be no additional noxious gases, odors, dust,light, vibration or noise by approval of partial self service facilities. The fire suppression system will reduce risk of injury and property damage. The propo sed use will not produce overcrowding or undue concentration of people on the property. Petitioner proposes that southerly side of southern island provide full service operation with balance of southern island and northern island to provide self-service. In addition kerosene and diesel pumps are proposed to be self-service. Diesel and kerosene are standard petroleum products offered for sale at gasoline serv~ce stations. Motorists using diesel and keresene are penalized with higher prices if such products must be provided only on a full-service basis. In addition, many operators, particularly truck operators, prefer to pump their own fuel. Such preference is still penalized with higher fuel prices if full-service must be offered at that pump. \'. >~',i f = T"'lcf>"'l [=--:-:'~~"j~~:::,~.)- eJ- ,J:cY- ~-jY e.:m; BAy~ L'Lc,eD -, 1 .- ~Py '''IE'''- !:SLAJD5 ... {\ .' N tit ~ \ VE.a.Jr eISE~C.; -''\ SrOI2~E IT .-:JFf'C.==- .f +-,,.!is .tL 'j j , w ~ IJ -I- "'.S5 "',..pt Co.... i', . '11"'" - . ;,,- . " '; EVST4.rs.........9 . 24'0' CA<.J<>Pf - CAoJ~p'y~' It-l..e>I' . + '00,'5 \. ..~~J/ (lV O~./ ..;0 ~. I I ,.",-, 'I1voP'( To E'ire: v~ (N_~ E\t':TG. r ~~. i 1 I I I I ~ ~ ) ~ . \l o. C\ Ii) ~. :+1; ~. , .' . .A'~\.' -- ----- -"';':" 3 , . , .:' . . ;.~- ",. ,-'. ;0. .',~'. <,' .;:,..... ", : ....-.'.::'- ).' ).'" . . . ';:~(( { ~;i/..J'ro"'.J - <".' ': :':~~~r"'~ ~ :..' ;', :'.-,-., 4.. " "\ ' II " ~ - ....-.'~."- ~\ (""'lto'_~ '.,\ 'I I I- N " I) .. "3 t ...."" + 00' ,OV' .<;;:G'ti ~Q""""s:r. -"'J!l/,O ~.J~('l'.? .O',G:; X .O',VZ /' _ O'3~O/"; , '\ . - " 'C' ~ , .. . ,l / ~~V\l?JllI3 ,(;1 ( . --- ,. 4....:t ,..,~J::J ';'/~ 55'(,(,-1- , "o',SL I I I I I I /- I '\ t ..,00,,1 ;\;lJ I "- -- / c. .<;-L" ~.B?Jtt '~.J.-;){~,) ~ ""',51 '.l~')(l'V< .o..~1 ....?I~ .3,"'3 '?f";> :, (""?'S ''''r'~S!'3 , ' ('SO'?) <;3....., ?,?\tQ.l"'$ ..O'.S~ :.l""'c:::l .L' 1>' t'''' "y .-l,^~d ;lo ar'3 += ..O_,Oj:;-- ~"'O'~:7 "'''1 sL'Lb ~i J [11: " , ..0:5 f-- I I ~I'L" t L"'''6+ IrjI L . 0 '" I\) f\J o <: ()) lf1 \.! 11] , .. " (. " I I I ~, ~ ;; '^ \Po ~ T D LD Y Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM TO: Jerry Goehringer, ZBA Chairman FROM: Planning Board DATE: June 11, 1987 RE: Tartan Oil Co. located at Mattituck This is in response to your memorandum of May 28, 1987. Since the Planning Board does not have a site plan application before it-at this time, we cannot give input, however, we do feel that some site plan approval is needed and we request that any approval by your Board be subject to site plan approval. . , '. Southold T owniJj~ard of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 2S SOUTHOLD. L.t., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE 15161765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Southold Town Planning Board and Town Planner Jerry Goehringer, ZBA Chairman May 28, 1987 Planning Board Jurisdiction Matter of Tartan Oil Co. Location of Property: Corner of Marratooka Lane and Main Road, Mattituck Zoning District: B-1 We presently have two applications pending concerning the above premises which is located in the "B-1" General Business Zoning District and more particularly shown on the attached survey. The applications involve both a Special Exception for partial self-service of gasoline and a Variance for a Convenience Store in conjunction with present gasoline services on less than one acre of land (Section 100-62). Since it is our policy to coordinate reviews when an application falls under both our jurisdictions, we would like to request your position at this time. As you know, the building is exist- ing (except .LDr recent renovations, canopy addition, new pumps, etc.), and a copy of the Certificate of Nonconforming Premises #Z14455 dated May 30, 1986 is attached for your consideration. We are in a position to schedule this matter for a public hearing and will need your input at this time, prior to the public hearinga if you feel Planning Board jurisdiction is appropriate. It is our understanding that in the Matter of Sukru Ilgin, a resolution was adopted by the Planning Board waiving jurisdiction for a similar(Variance)project. Thank you for your review in this matter, 1 k "'" 0~\'V~~\ ''0_ I' " ( Gc..IC1r.;:lr,f"e~.:i 1-0 ,'-tl,,: c",aror!~:; CC;'',P'I''Y ;;l.sSJ,lrv<:/~d .../w)~ lS;j'!)70 VAg'77.;YL~' !!:!CN . ..~ 'h. '-I /' " '/.;:1."'1/" r. '':/'''' ....-r7". L\."". , L/c.-::r is:=.a La('" ..5..I"".,'C'.a-',$" r Cr~...n=,.t, .N, Yo . _______...____. ___.____... I _ '. '---(-:----------- --' --- -------- -- --...- \ .- i i ] l .., F<.OA.-- 1 [Y1 r-1 i t-I .~:. 2~"'-' ' ---,-;:; cr:_,,:G.~ ". " J ) , \!) '0 " .:1 ....~ .::i''::f~:--- ....~-- I \~ 'I,) ~ " ~ 1 , II) \;1 ~ .... i :::J I ~ ~~ I ! ). ~ , I <l: ,I III - t , ~~ h. ... 4} ( 'I) ~ :J !I) I , ---t!J.~- ~ ;,; J. \.:r.:",.......,.,.~ \,:!';,;J"',',~ " . ~ .. I 4<>. N.e~~3r.~o"W. Z':;C,()c; 6u\t( ~eY Eve-oks I I I I I ! ! i i : ; 1,-,1'::,,0' 0,::::- P.c.OPE:.P,{'~ SURVE.y'E::; rt...~1<. -""LY :' ......1.... P r--r-R 1""./ --I I,' 1 = / V_t=.i,Jf i' CORP. Ai /Vl...;;-;-,I TUCK.. SUFFOI-K cc.~ N. Y. . . I I ! I ..:5'::JGiL.-:=: ,,:,.)' ~ I/J a -Jr",,; -I-~ - ~'rr ...:.. ::':;"-.;ll'l, t.::Jr::~ric:.r.,"n~t7. '~""""-- _,1_ .....'.. -,./'7/ rl . ! -' ' t;_I_ !..:,,:;_,_J.-:::.~-:..E. c -,- qr---"" I. ~ z ~ '-l ~,A ,,)'i ~ ~ ~ ,"l. \\~ ~\ " !r)' '{ ~ ~ ~ t'( ~ I I . . ':----f::J.;- --9'i- i i 1\ 1\ ! \ , . 1 : !} r' ).lNAI.!THORrrtO AtTE:l:ATJ'.)N Oil: "DomOt TO TI-!15 su~vzy 15 A VI::LAT:ON OF SECTIC:-l ;..:9 OF ni~ t'>::W YORK STAff EDUCATICN LAW. cems Cf 11-:15 su^v~y MAP NOT afAm ThE t..,:,l'-~ ~:":,.":':~:;:: ;:~:~~o SEAt Oil EMECS~:C ScAL ~~:.....~t ~;:;T R~ CCNSIDEU TO ~:: A VA~j;;J i:".W:: C::?f. CiVAll.A1\.r::s :~:::':Af:::> :.:~~:C~ SHALL '" C",~Y iO n:: ,_.:::;.. .'~OI. Wl-:C\\ m! !l IS ,i:E:A'(:':. A:;' ':;:') ~:;S ;:';:IAtF TO iH~ TiTL~ C':.-,\,~i"Y, v,;'1~hj:,:\;:J'HAl AC;LNC', U:":'i:,,G 1..S,jll.;T;;j;~ 1,;51':0 I:.~~ON, ....Iol TO THi ASS:::;:"US Cf n:e tEhO:;-IG INST! TLTiOij. GUA~UH~S ";'E NOT UAtlSffll. iO "O;)IJ/ON~L Ih5TITUTlO,,"" 01 SUUEc =....,~f!"_5. '1 r.C"''' 11='" _'. __.1;;.;.1 ( TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ( -'/I.yJ'75 )n (/Z1 ',~~ ~ :.lAY 13::37 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION T cwn C:;!rk ~C"',.:ttffl:fI Appl ication No. --3 /'...3 3 Date Filed: TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK: of150 Broad Hollow Rd. (Residence, House No. and Street) Melville, NY c/o William D. Moore, Esq. suite 3 ClaBBe Commons Mattit (Hamlet, State, Zlp Code, Telephone Number) 298-5674 hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE VII , SECTION 100-70 , SUBSECTION b5 I (We), TARTAN OIL CORP. for the below-described property for the following uses and purposes (and as shown on the attached plan drawn to scale): partial self-service gasoline station 'at Mobil station at Marratooka Lane and Main Road in Mattituck, NY A. Statement of Ownership and Interest. Tartan Oil Corp. property known and referred to as is(are) the owner(s) of M"fHo~~~1fo~, T'str~et~'ka~f~t) 10,,,,,, M::.+-+-i+-nr-'k- identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section ll~, Block j Lot(s) 9 " which is not (is) on a subdivision Map (Filed - "Map of " Fil ed Map No. and has been approved by the Southold Town Planning Board on as a [Minor] [Major] Subdivision). The above-described property was acquired by the owner on ,,/in!, q7? B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with th2 intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therefor in said ordinance and would not be detrimental to prop.erty or persons in ,the neighqorhood for the foll.owing reasons: Site ~s presentl ~mproved by reta~l gasol~ne serv~ce stat~on. The self-serV~ce aspect such use will have no impact upon the surrounding neighborhood. Such a use is reflective of the demands of the public and the costs of gasoline and petroleum products. Self-service now accounts for more than 80 percent of petroleum sales. The proposed use will comply in a ways with the requirements of sections 100-70 b4 and 5 (see add'l pg.) C. The property which is the subject of this application is zoned B-1 ar [x] is consistent with th2 use(s) described in the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished herewith. L ] is not consist2nt with the Certificate of Or.cupancy being furnished herewith for the following reason(s): ZB2 (rev: 2/6/86) . i/li)ibv-- of /11,,; , 19J7. ---=;\ PATRICI... C. MOORE J NOT "RY PUBliC, SI"le 01 .Hew York No\4861668, Sullolk COllnty Com"""'''" bPi~S June 16, 1988 _ [ ] is vacant land. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) sS.: .. -.. , ~ TARTAN OIL CORP. SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION PAGE 2 B. cont'd. to insure the safe and orderly use of the pro~erty. The proposed use will not adversely affect the health, safety, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town. The character of the use and development of uses in this zqning distric, will not be affected by the approval of partial self-service on this property. Nor will the proposed use adversely affect property values. Partial self-service will not unduly increase vehicular traffic con- gestion. Nor will such a use have effect on the availability and adequacy of water and sewer resources. No additional parking demands will be created by the proposed use and there will be no additional noxious gases, odors, dust,light, vibration or noise by approval of partial self service facilities. The fire suppression system will reduce risk of injury and property damage. The propo sed use will not produce overcrowding or undue concentration of people on the property. Petitioner proposes that southerly side of southern island provide full service operation with balance of southern island and northern island to provide self-service. In addition kerosene and diesel pumps are proposed to be self-service. Diesel and kerosene are standarc petroleum products offered for sale at gasoline servjce stations. Motorists using diesel and keresene are penalized with higher prices if such products must be provided only on a full-service basis. In addition, many operators, particularly truck operators, prefer to pump their own fuel. Such preference is still penalized with higher fuel prices if full-service must be offered at that pump. . I " I I) i~ ,; V\ VI ~ \j 'm i~ 15 ~ . '" '< :J s o IV '" '" o -i ifil .... ~"."l f .,7.12- I I s:c. 1 " I [ . VI 1\ 1Il <u '[J I ! I I I 400.o'':t;, f EoJO of PAV'r "7 AH'HALr PAVf. 35:"0" SE.rOA~ LI.JE~ (c..os.) E;(S~,.r.". s,G..) i ('".,c. €":E' $"1G.o.> 1"'0' I-fA)l.lli, I'S'.".. ~ L &;~~r';;. Ar>sJ!A t...T~. "','5 jtz.~ Ct.O!.A"~ -) -'" I ( CEY 1"00'- ) \ ' , / -- I 1\ I ~- Tv/' r.'.~...' !"..... . I 1 I 'i " (t' " &1/~r~ e""y' / ,~ '_l../'l::'E;Q - I ....".5:5' I i I 24"0")( 5':0' CI."Df'Y 01/;<'''- 1:s<.A"O~ I I 7;;.'.0" .J8~'..40"OO" E: -t-"".e'Z.. ... II N -\ I J . .. " .\' , ~ _.~~~ \, r Ii :1 .. .. - 1\ II 7-~;I~..J I.. .~ !l b \ , \ " , c..uof"o/ .('... .,' ',d,( ::-. . E " ',~ . 'ES '. . " +-".!'i!:' Tw~' r,,4y r,,'"",(~, TAT'O.) -==--1=-"",-=----1- ":;';";.-, -;-=:.-:..:.:=.; ~ ----'!':.' - --.=:'=.=:_- - J~f-'rJ.. ~V ; tr e.:sr~ BAys / I L-l..L:)~ED '==~,-r -- ~- 'S J"p'f Ol/itl~ !:)I..AJO:; Q ... II '" -, I , , , .. '''.'is c."opY Co... -.... I MP::> I ~f I ,- M Ek'ST';'. t'S"A'" 9 ^ , 24'0' .cAu~Pi ~ CA.Jdf"( c.~ . ~sn:_r"i.A'" ? ~ /1 . <;.~5J/ I r:-/ i - / , '0/ i' ~./ . v/ ,," {"Po.,JorJY To E'i'Tt:. u'} """r:.l- E\l':r("~ ,. , . '. I I I I I I I ~ ~ 1 ~ . 11 /. r f".,J1fI '" ~ " a\ I/) ------ ----- ..- - I I I I --1- --".ll.c.------. ." , .' '.' + '0"'. ')5 ~ I ) . ~,~~ti .1' Edv nc ~. . ~;..V~ , ~-- -1 ( ,~ ~ 18--- -.,. - L.,...., ',..-, I~L.~.vO. (c<J.we,-,- ~,~ ~ '::"-=/'/1;;""'- PuNtf-' Lr~ "-- ~ I D I c I I I I ;-) ..... --------------- \' I ____ I ) i f '-, I: '-- ,.' ~ '__ 35', o. .,rErt.AC"~ L, oJ~...-,;,. ('::";ooc...) + 10 I o~. '"- /' I I -, J I I , I I lIJl ,,91 -,,:,1 (" 0' , ! , I C1i fI'i . ./ L?/ -, I I I ! ! 10Z_,-? I I 1 , I I +lol.S2. +!GlGl. ss ______ + 101.40 I 1+10'3.1; . . I / , \- :..'i , t. " \-, \J' ! i ",I: 1..:1 ~I ~/ ...., , 0' " I I I ! t ~, ; I ..J 11 d <'- ...' ") \:J ~ .) V), I , ! I I I " ,I L, -" OWdf!;~2- ~._~- RI4~:" '.' et;r~:"E..Jf'\- l~a ~rz~4",) f.ku.l..C1 M"'"Vll'-~ J.J.y. :( FonM NO.3 ( TOWN 01' SOUTIIOLD llUILDlNG DEI'ARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF D1SAI'I'IWV AL Date ..~...I............,19.~.1. To .W~"''mD;d:\J... X .Y~. .ri:!..!=.o. ~~.~....c:Q~,~"... >>'1.~oA-., !'?:':1.'. .I.}.~.~-.},........ ~'l ~- ~-I."'l'j PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated... '>>:j.Q..?\-~. .!.7... . .. . ..,19.8 J . forl'cnnit to construct . ."1. ~~.~... J:>1~.(.. :~:r4:-...................... at Location of Property ........... .lrl.~ .-f.~.'i;...... !1.1~ f,.9... .M.~.Jc- . .lfousa No. Streot lI.Jm/(!( County Tax Map No. 1000 Section .....! /.:;;::. . . . . 1lI0ck .....9. i3. . . . . Lot . .9. ~. . . . . . . . . File No. ......,........................ . I SlIuJivi,ion. . . ., . . . . . . . . . '" Filed Map No. ................ Lot No. ........,..'....... is retllrlled herewith and disapproved all the following grollnds Q;4<.4)J]r. ~ .~.i.~ -:7.D\~.!:>) r~'c,.I! '~b ~.~ .fZo;1-!';~~' .~F~ .~~'f:~.~ .1,...r.>.,~.'. .~;)'.o,A.I.<!'Q -: (g.;J.P" ~]-~. .2..~.", ,I).ON,~~ .~.U;-<,-. ~n'~' ~.:sX~"""""""""'" ............................~..~.'............. . .....~ . ............................. :C.~.d?~~........... lluilding Inspector nv 1'CO " , . < '\ '\/~ ~~ \) .. Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD. L.I.. N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (5161 765.1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN. JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI May 30, 1987 William D. Moore, Esq. Clause Commons, Suite 3 P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Applications No. 3636V and 3633SE - Tartan Oil Corp. Property Location: Corners of Main Road, Marratooka and Sunset Lanes, Mattituck Dear Bill: This letter will acknowledge receipt of the above applications, which are under review by the Board members, field inspections, etc. prior to scheduling these matters for public hearings. The Board has requested the following information: (1) Four prints showing all pole and building lights, canopy lights, permanent egress/ingress areas [rear incl.]. Please clarify the types of lighting used in these areas, which may all be sketched on the prepared site plans. (2) Sketch showing the previous location of the pumps and island [recently removed]. (3) Copies of permits authorizing recent renovation, construction, and occupancy for the convenience store and self-service gasoline operations. [If no permits are available, please explain.] We have asked the Planning Board to consider jurisdiction in this matter. and vou will be advised as to whether or not a formal request is ~et~ssaryfor a waiver from the site-plan review requirement for this B-1 Business Zoning District [Art. VII, Section 100-70]. '. ._~...... .page 2 - May 30, 1987 Re: Appls. No. 3636V and 3633SE Tartan Oil Corp. (Mattituck) To: William D. Moore, Esq. .-.::,. Upon receipt of all of the above, the Board will be in a position to calendar these matters for public hearings. Yours very truly, A.../~4 (~ , ~-~.<--j, / ~~~r GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN 1 k cc: Planning Board .Buildin9 Department .' " .. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF l3U1LDlNG INspeCTOR TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NEW YOnK 'J . " CERTIFICi\'I'E OF OCCUPANCY NONCONFORi\lING PI: El\lISES TIllS IS TO CERTIFY that the IX I Land r I l3uilding( s) I-I Use(s) Pre C.O. #- Z14455 Date- May 30, 1986 Street shown on County tax map as District 1000, Section 90 llifJ~O Marratool<a Lane Main Rd. Mattituck Hamlet 115 ,l31ock 3 located at Lot 9, does(not)conform to the present l3uilding Zone Code of the Town of Southold for the following reasons: " On the basis of information presented to the l3uilding Inspector's Office, it has been determined that the above nonconforming I XI Land r:J l3uilding(s) I-:JUse(s) existed on the effective date the present l3uilding Zone Code of the Town of Southold, and may be continued pursuant to and subject to the appli- d' cable provisions of said Code. IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED that, based upon information presented to the l3uilding Inspector's Office, the occupancy and use for which this Certifi- cate is issued is as follows: Property contains a one-story wood-framed buildin~ with gas pumps in front. Property is situated in the B-1 General Business Zone with access to Main Rd.; a state maintained road and Marratooka Rd.; a town highway. The Certificate is issued to TARTAN OIL CORP. (owner, HH~HHtH~~W of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N/A l'IOTICE IS HEREl3Y GIVEN that the owner of the above premises ILI\S NOT COl'lSENTED TO AN Il'ISPECTION of the premises by the l3uilding Inspec- tor to determine if the premises comply with u11 upplicable codes and ordin- ances, other than the l3uilding Zone Code, und therefore, no such inspection has been conducted. This Certificate, therefore, does not, and is not intended to certify that the premises comply with all other applicable codes and regula- tions. C-k~~L- 3uildirJg ins?ector -l ~~\ bJ\u Southold Town Board of Appeals \ MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SDUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P_ GDEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGDNIS, JR_ SERGE DOYEN, JR_ ROBERT J_ DOUGLASS JOSEPH H_ SAWICKI May 30, 1987 Dear Bi 11 : This letter will acknowledge receipt of the above applications, ,which are under review by the Board members, field inspections, etc. prior to scheduling these matters for public hearings. The Board has requested the following information: (1) Four prints showing all poie and building lights, canopy lights, permanent egress/ingress areas [rear incl.J. Please clarify the types of lighting used in these areas, which may all be sketched on the prepared site plans. (2) Sketch showing the previous location of the pumps and island [recently removedJ. (3) Copies of permits authorizing recent renovation, construction, and occupancy for the convenience store and self-service gasoline operations. [If no permits are available, please explain.J We have asked the Planning Board to consider jurisdiction in this matter. and yOU will be advised as to whether or not a formal reque~t is ~ec~ssaryfor a waiver from the site-plan review requirement for this B-1 Business Zoning District [Art. VII, Section 100-70J. -. .page 2 - May 30, 1987 Re: Appls. No. 3636V and 3633SE Tartan Oil Corp. (Mattituck) To: William D. Moore, Esq. Upon receipt of all.of the above, the Board will be in a position to calendar these matters for public hearings. Yours very truly, . A.. .A~';.?~ .~ / ~~1J+..~v ./~i4< (7" GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN 1 k cc: Planning Board .Building Department . . . . J APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAO - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I.. N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (5161765.1809 GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Southold Town Planning Board and Town Planner Jerry Goehringer, ZBA Chairma~ May 28, 1987 Planning Board Jurisdiction Matter of Tartan Oil Co. Location of Property: Corner of Marratooka Lane and Main Road, Mattituck Zoning District: B-1 We presently have two applications pending concerning the above premises which is located in the "B-1" General Business Zoning District and more particularly shown on the attached survey. The applications involve both a Special Exception for partial self-service of gasoline and a Variance for a Convenience Store in conjunction with present gasoline services on less than one acre of land (Section 100-62). Since it is our policy to coordinate reviews when an application falls under both our jurisdictions, we would like to request your position at this time. As you know, the building is exist- ing (except for recent renovations, canopy addition, new pumps, etc.), and a copy of the Certificate of Nonconforming Premises #Z14455 dated May 30, 1986 is attached for your consideration. We are in a position to schedule this matter for a public hearing and will need your input at this time, prior to the public hearing, if you feel Planning Board jurisdiction is appropriate. It is our understanding that in the Matter of Sukru Ilgin, a resolution was adopted by the Planning Board waiving jurisdiction for a similar(Variance)project, Thank you for your review in this matter. lk ( GUC1r"r,r~t:'.i 1-0 nOt/:: c",c:mr}~:; Ccr,',Fd"Y ;;rssw'v<:/::d ../U'11:: IS;J.:J70 VAN'77.IYI- ~ SCN /':.I.~r,.l '-/ J '-"""r",r fl. /.'%<!-\:''''7 '. . , L,'c..:".s::.d L.,r'.1 J5.HV~/<::>>'$ ';;;r~CC,.t, .N, Yo ______.____~,_______,._ I _ \ i , , 1\ ./ .- 1 , ! , J '1 \J) \g ( --'~--- ~---- -- -- -~ F<.Op''? [Y! M i r-! Z~J.5,-:' ........(-:.: 9;~.:.,^ ~ " a....... ..,~;;J A-<1 ~-. i I I , i ! f 1;1 :':) ~ ). Q:: Il\l ~ -- " , o " -1 \~lrrv,.~ \.5';01""'" '" ~lJJ ~ ,I r-) , ~~ -- r- 40' t I I h. It! ~ '1) ~ :J i !J) r ' '----t t!I..:J- ~ Gv\+(~eY Evcoks N.88"3'!'JtO" vV. zoo..;)" I I I I ! ! i ! ; M,c,,o OF P;::;:OF.EKT'r" SURVe.yee F"Ct<. -" I LY :' "-11.- PG:.-rR CLEU/v! CORP. ! 1 1 ! I ,c, -r /v1,A,7"TI TUCK.. SUFi~'O(...r::' ce.) N, y, I l ..5.'::"i~~: 6 /}' _ IIJ o:=: ir c-r: pl"r:~ :::: ;:r:;r';1f'1, C)r~:uic.r.m.:;t1. , II nc: N',::;, 1~.~7607 . _.. _. ..-------.--. ~ I., III 1JJ "I' \,) .,J' ~ Z " q: ~ ~ ~ ,:) ,"l. "I ~l . " ~ " ~ ~ ~ 1'( ~ I I . ' '--'f'=', ~- ...... i I I: , I ! . I: I' fA ),INAUTHORlno AlTE:lATl::JN OR Aoomol'< TO THIS SUJ:.V2f IS A VIClAr:ON OF SECTION 7::<''::9 OF ni~ NEW YCRK STATE EDUCATICN LAW. cems CF Ti:iS StJ:;.v~Y ""AP NOT !!.fARING THE LAt"D ~'.;.-y':':C:\': ;~!:;~O 5tAl OR EMECSS:C SeAL ~~,A~L .'::~T ~ CONSIOEiED TO !~ A VA~j::J L.Li~ C-:;Pf. GL'ARA)'.;T::S :~~::::Ar:O ":~r.:CN SHALL RUN Cr-:~f i~ ii';: .-_.::~., i:;;"~ w::C.\\ THE !u:t" 15 ,i$Af[:':. ;....;; '::;:1 til5 C;:;jALf TO THa Tin:: C:;,,;....,~y, v(;'I~;:i:;.\ENTAL ACitNCY ,. U:-.:;'l:~G j,SiiTLiTi':;,.. L;SHO I;_I<~ON, AHD TO THo AS!:;~N~.S Cf THe Ilt.-DING 'JoISTI- TUiC,1. GUAlLIt.'HE~S AtoE ,",OT nlAN5ffiAe TO AODITIONAL IhSTlTUTlOhS Oil suaSE(J') ::W!'<f!l.S, .. 1"'''''''''1\:''' _....~.'1l>.U ( TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ( "'/lYJ?" )n CM / },iAY 13 ":~87 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION Town Clerk Sout1lnIfI Appl i cati on No. --.3 /, 03 Date Filed: TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK: I (We), TARTAN OIL CORP. of150 Broad Hollow Rd. (Residence, House No. and Street) Melville, NY c/o William D. Moore, Esq. suite 3 Claaae Commons Mattitu' (Hamlet, State, Zlp Code, Telephone Number) 298-5674 hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE VII , SECTION 100-70 , SUBSECTION b5 for the below-described property for the following uses and purposes (and as shown on the attached plan drawn to scale): partial self-service gasoline station 'at Mobil station at Marratooka Lane and Main Road in Mattituck, NY A. Statement of Ownership and Interest. Tartan Oil Corp. property known and referred to as is(are) the Mr:I[Jr.:=at-(){)k.::i T.;:anPo ;:ann Mpin Wf""l.:::ln House No., Street, Hamlet) identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section ll~, Block J Lot(s) 9 , which is not (is) on a subdivision Map (Filed ---- "Map of " Filed Map No. and has been approved by the Southold Town Planning Board on as a [Minor] [Major] Subdivision). The above-descri bed property was acqui red by the owner on 1 1 /1 n /1 q 72 , B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therefor in said ordinance and would not be detrimental to prop.erty or persons in the nei ghborhood for the fo 11 owi ng reasons: Si te is present ly improved by retail gasoline service station. The self-serVice aspect 0; such use will have no impact upon the surrounding neighborhood. Such a use is reflective of the demands of the public and the costs of gasoline and petroleum products. Self-service now accounts for more than 80 percent of petroleum sales. The proposed use will comply in al ways with the requirements of sections 100-70 b4 and 5 (see add'l pg.) C. The property which is the subject of this appl ication is zoned B-1 and [x] is consistent with the use(s) described in the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished herewith. L ] is not consistent with the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished herewith for the following reason(s): owner(s) of M;:a+-+-itll(""k. [ ] is vacant land. ~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK~ JiJ((2 STATE OF NEW YORK) sS.: ( 1 sworn~t/~ b fore me this l.l.tlctay of /t1"'1 ' 19J]. , ~~r~ /~bh ~ (Nota u lC PATRICIA C. MOORE NOTARY PUBUC. SIal. of ~~ Yon: ZB2 (rev. 2/6/86) No, "'''68, ""0" C..." Commi.l$ion b'piJ8s June 16. 1988 ---------.-"'., ~ 1 -.,,"" TARTAN OIL CORP. SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION PAGE 2 B. cont'd. to insure the safe and orderly use of the property. The proposed use will not adversely affect the health, safety, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town. The character of the use and development of uses in this zoning district will not be affected by the approval of partial self-service on this property. Nor will the proposed use adversely affect property values. Partial self-service will not unduly increase vehicular traffic con- gestion. Nor will such a use have effect on the availability and adequacy of water and sewer resources. No additional parking demands will be created by the proposed use and there will be no additional noxious gases, odors, dust,light, vibration or noise by approval of partial self service facilities. The fire suppression system will reduce risk of injury and property damage. The propo sed use will not produce overcrowding or undue concentration of people on the property. Petitioner proposes that southerly side of southern island provide full service operation with balance of southern island and northern island to provide self-service. In addition kerosene and diesel pumps are proposed to be self-service. Diesel and kerosene are standard petroleum products offered for sale at gasoline service stations. Motorists using diesel and keresene are penalized with higher prices if such products must be provided only on a full-service basis. In addition, many operators, particularly truck operators, prefer to pump their own fuel. Such preference is still penalized with higher fuel prices if full-service must be offered at that pump. ~ , " :( FORM NO.3 ( TOWN Of SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OffICE SOUTHOLI). N.Y. NOTICE OF D1SAPI'ROV A L FileNo. ............... .......... .,. ... Date..~..J.. ....... .... 19 .$.1. To .WM1...m~.:x. .y.~. .i:.P..~' ~~.~....cj>~.~..... ')y).~cA-:. (I.?:':!.'. ,1).~.~."),.. .. .... ~~ ~- ...-/" 7</ PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated ... }Y.j.Q-?l,~. . ! .7. . . . . . . . .. 19 .8 J. . forpcnnit toconstruct.."I.. ~~.~... .l?1~.l.. .~*-...................... at Location of Property ........... .1r1. ~ ~:';d.~';'-; .t.~.-I: . . . . . . !,>.1 ~ f.:.~. . . .M. ~.cA- Nouse! No. Strcor II.:Jln/(!( County Tax Map No. 1000 Section. ....//.:;:..... llIock .....~."i3..... Lot . .9.~......... Suudivision. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. FiledMap No. ................ Lot No. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds Qi:4i;4)DI.:;l,p ~.I.~ ~7.o\'S,.S-) I 1~q..\l'~b~~ .12":1"\':'!~~" .~F~ .~~'f:<-M .~.~.~.~.'. .CM.:4<;.4A.1.1(l\7 (.>..;l.I3 ~]-~. f,l!>R .I)P!\-I.~~ .r'~'h' ~ .~~.................... ............................~....'....,.............. . .....~ ....................... :C.ck.cP~~........ .,. Building Inspector nv l/CO " , >,c" 'i1::rJ ~~,j " : .' )':'. ,.'. """\. ';~#....":? "ZQ'Il' + ".3 .,00' ,OV. .~@tI '~ I- I':'. I) .. " - , I I I i I ,Ci"""U c.JlI,D j,el.I"''f'? ."','" X .O"VZ ".0'=--7" -, / . C, '3 ,on', ~ ~ifJ:?_H"=' 1 9j o ~ L ~! ." ,l) ~ i \ v - \ "' .. ,l \11.i......~ ',~ j ,'~'~.j ";',~ - ss-(,{,-t I , / --\ t "e>Od;SO()) '- 'c::_ c .....'O"~7 ...~ .L'L4 "] -<;.1."1 ~J!TtJlt '~..LH5;; ~ . ,,-,.;1 'J."')l'f~ .o',~1 ('1"71$ .35\'9 '.>1"''',) ~ f'?'$ 'o'I'%SJt3 , , 0'52 ., , ('SO"?) ~:lf' II -;>':)\1'0.1"'5 ..o',S~ :l""'~ J.'l>'t'!c1,y .J.,^'0 . '" C1('3 :;:.,0 -.op.- -, ..o~S' I I ~I'LC. t L"'''' -t IIj\ 1- , '" N I\J 0 ~ (' c lb It '" III .- j \t ~'i V) , I &~I . " ~I I ~ ~ Ii { '^ I \II I ~i;'V:-~" .",._...4.11 i",.). , 'J , , ,'. -i.. ~l I \11 \j) ,- 1\ . ~ t 1\ 1\ ?.l.'1\3"7:J!!J~" ['P3.!1<3 oJ. /...,JO""';_/ I , I I I I /? //0" .~O /, ~O ,/f,>' / ' $' '(>01 + . "".. t_:> o"'''''"!~'.;tt5G" . .,,:.' ..1 ,'.- '~~r'fl) ..f j...,JPPV.7 .0, l'Z. , 6",,,,,:1 ''J?.I.S~3 - lit . N i:> .. ..,.? J.,..."V l:iS'"'' T --;.~.I1Z: M 3~ZiO..LS ~ s!>"'-+ " ';2:33,,2' J.C'7J1' :~'- i I~O('tr15:I. '",./,0 j,';q(' s; I I i ~-'- f' -"- _:~.:=-./ -- ~~:--: >~.,.g ;;:jl"=l __ 0::3'50"1.-"/ II ~ 01 .~ ,.., ,/'6' -(I _."~, '~"'-r-' "-""'O;'T-----t=~ \,C711~-!. -.)~Jr-;"l~( f'tJI<'d (rf^-L ~- .' F==- ------~ ,_V '-'~I+ -------. ..... ..-_._.__._-_._-_.__.,-----------~.- " 3"1<tJr"O / "0 101+ .. .ZI;'/""2: ! es '001 + -- i , r T ,,:3-:: 101 I ( '3"'''?) -;. a""l ?i:>.-;lJ3j .0 '.S~ ~ ~' :...J../I'O"d .J. , "rod,p-' ;i"'t"'1>:I: '''''' dwnd .'B'/\Mr>l)' 1...L: (l"tr "f'''t . ~ .""jl:~ . ~..J. ;;X3. "7:J~,..CJ (j (l a.J.'x'3 . n .~ J,"1l (1 " " .; /--- ----. '- -'-- ---_.~--.-- - "-.-.-...-. - '~---'-----'-- .:, -;:..;p ~'" 1. --"'d'3^<? .i';;;;--: '7(~ " -'"",1"/1 ~'/.:J li\.7l(l"'\ "3'....f'O~ ..,......, , :..::~-z -' oooo'.'~ 'tr~2JV'"?1(';~ ;-- "'---'----- I /~ , , 'I .0'1 iVl 1'- j 0, ,11 ,m ~ , , 'kr. ""3,11",,,,1.-1 a"'Oft .:".J....~ZJ~ C'~d ....,., ;ll""".l"'d e, 1" T7i'j -.-.-,......-- c..~J.i3PMO "G1 .'C .'0 'e. J::; (/'1 I. I~ ' ~ 1 'I IV 1/ , 1 ~l.'iOI-tf ; ! I~") i ~) I .~ /~ J~ i1 :.\. , I !r\ i ~ " !- i,: ..\ , J ! i 01>"101+ / , L !P it!! I . , ! , I / I , I , <L., 'ZOI - I 0 ; , <') 1':"- i 0" 1f11 I i i I I ! ! I I i 2S'lo\~ c. I I :is '001-+ ~o tOl + (:iaC?) '7.3r'1 -;:"?l>"Jl.3S .0 '.Sf: -......" C_ ~ -----, "-- ,.;wnd ""''''910/,,::? .(j""'.7"~:r: lA~"-'-:I u..::; :P'). tr-- ("l "..eA,^,(liJ i QAf /Jl , ,cr ". , ^" I ri~-- ---- .--.----..---- '--1.~::; do v ! , / I I I I i i I I ! l~ f' 'y VI ,'- TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING u.:SI'ECTOR TOWN BALL SOUTIIOLD, NEW YOnK j . ~ I , CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NONCONFORi\1ING PR El\lISES TIIIS IS TO CERTIFY that the IX I Land ,-, Building(s) CJ Use(s) Pre C.O. #- Z14455 Date- May 30, 1986 located at 90 lfiASO Marratooka Lane Main Ro. Mattituck Hamlet 115 . Block 3 Street shown on County tax map as District 1000. Section Lot 9. doestnot)conform to the present Building Zone Code of the Town of Southold for the following reasons: " On the basis of information presented to the Building Inspector's Office, it has been determined that the above nonconforming I!:.I Land C-' Building(s) 1-:.JUse(s) existed on the effective date the present Building Zone Code of the Town of Southold. and may be continued pursuant to and subject to the appli- II' cable provisions of said Code. IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED that. based upon information presented to , I . the Building Inspector's Office. the occupancy and use for which this Certifi- cate is issued is as follows: Property contains a one-story wood-framed building with gas pumps in front. Property is situated in the B-1 General Business Zone with access to Main Rd.; a state maintained road and Marratooka Rd.; a town highway. The Certificate is issued to TARTAN OIL CORP. (owner. H~~HtH~~W of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N/A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the owner of the above premises ILI\S NOT CONSENTED TO AN INSPECTION of the premises by the Building Inspec- tor to determine if the premises comply with all applicable codes and ordin- ances, other than the Building Zone Code. and therefore, no such inspection has been conducted. This Certificate. therefore, does not, and is not intended to certify that the premises comply with all other applicable codes and regula- tions. . C~~~L ~~uHdhlg ins;)cctor . Southold Town:'iB~ard of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAO 25 SOUTHOLD. L.I" N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (5161765.1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Southold Town Planning Board and Town Planner Jerry Goehringer, ZBA Chairman May 28, 1987 Planning Board Ju~isdiction Matter of Tartan Oil Co. Location of Property: Corner of Marratooka Lane and Main Road, Mattituck Zoning District: B-1 We presently have two applications pending concerning the above premises which is located in the "B-1" General Business Zoning District and more particularly shown on the attached survey. The=nr~'~Ol"_ !~ '~- ;;..!; 'T;~~ _ ? . _ ", ~._~>.-- " H -.- Since it is our policy to coordinate reviews when an application falls under both our jurisdictions, we would like to request your position at this time. As you know, the building is exist- ing (except :fiDr recent renovations, canopy addition, new pumps, etc.), and a copy of the Certificate of Nonconforming Premises #Z14455 dated May 30, 1986 is attached for your consideration. Thank you for your review in this matter. 1 k '1'\ (....-~\'),-~<b\ \ " -- ( Guarar,-r~",d 1-0 -rtf/c Cl.fan71J~'::; CCr,,?".,v ;;l'.ss"'Y'v~./~d './UII<: IS;J':;70 VAt-.f"/!.;'I"'L~, SC,"; i ,:../.-'L.-. r-, -'. '-I -r <....vr';'TI{. ,r:z..LV-<.''I'''., L/~::r ;S.=.,-I Lar>.1 .t:itrV~';""'-..:r ; C;r~"'o,.t, N, ~ --~--_._-___.___~___. I s-- , -- ; ----- )~,' .- ; I : 1 , J l' R.eA -;. -' \D 'D ~ I ~ :OJ ~ "- ~ ~ ~~ ), ~ <l: ,l ~l . h. ~< "- 4l ~ 'I) < :J !r) I ~!J.~-~ (Y1hi8 - ZI:J /.,:1,~ ~/-;:.! C?:~d:~'" " Q '..~ .;::/::r~'-'- """'''''0' -' ~ , -0 ~ \.:1~"",,,,'~ \~+.:I1",'j" r-40t N. 88~3'f'~O" iIV. Z~<7Ii;)a GUlWt:-e... evccks i '1 I I ! ! i i ! f/J,c.,O Q,= PkOPE:P:,'r~ SUR.veYEe FeN. Tr-~LL Y PE;/RCLEU/v! CORP. Ai I I i j /,V!,~-;-T/ TUCK.. SUFp.Ct....1(' Ceo" N. y, s.::,,;~.=~ a,"J' - II' 0= Ir.:;r; ,::;'rc ::: :: ':;'-:;Jf"l, ar- ::':Jric:.r;, J?7 ~,-, . ..,,-- -' '> .! _!,~c: 1"-;';" 1..,..~76c7 . ----------- -- tp- -..-- I., Il\ I.) q '- \J :z: Cl: " ,J\t ~ , , .:) ,"t ". :1 " tI)' 't ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ! '--'f'::J. ~--- . , I I I; i! , . i ~ I' Vi "VNAllTHORrZto ALU:<ATi:)N all. AOO/TlOI'< TO T~J5 SU;;:V::V IS A VI::-LATiON OF ISECTIC:-l nC9 OF THE l'O.;W YORK: STATE EDUCATION LAW. cems CF n:iS su;;.v~y .'/lAP NOT a.EARING THE LAI\O !'J..y':':.~::.': ;~~;~~D SfAL OR EMECS!:C S:Al ~":A,L .':.;1 B~ CCN510UEO TO ~~ A VA~I::l j:J.;~ C:?f, Gl'ARA!\.T::S :~~:;;::M:::l :':~r::C:-l SHALL Rl,;N C/<.:LY TO T;.:: c..'::::" .'~it wec,\, fue !U.1.~ IS i"':E;'A~(~. A.;:: .:;.,: ~j,S ;::;IALF TO rH~ TiH~ c:"';^;~Y, u'-"~'1i:;;j;,:,rNfAL ACi(NCY . If:..:'i:,,G I.Sji11.'Ti':;,~ L;S1.;O 1:.Ii.~ON, "'J.l0 TO THi A~S:C;:-'::S Cf THE LU,D:~IG IN5TI. TLTiCiL GUA~NrEi:S A::E I"OT TaA,jSffRA~ .0 .O:J!JlO......L ',..STftUTlOld O. SUiII$E,",'-' :-W~l!lS. ).EC:l"}E) ( TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ( ,-,;J;YJ? 5. ),-, {/JJ :.lAY 13 '::37 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION Appl icati on No. --3 {, -33 Date Filed: Town C:zrk ~C"uitmid TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK: I (We), TARTAN OIL CORP. of150 Broad Hollow Rd. (Residence, House No. and Street) Melville, NY c/o william D. Moore, Esq. suite 3 Claaae Commons Mattit (Hamlet, state, Zlp Code, Telephone Number) 298-5674 hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE VII , SECTION 100-70 , SUBSECTION b5 for the below-described property for the following uses and purposes (and as shown on the attached plan drawn to scale): partial self-service gasoline station 'at Mobil station at Marratooka Lane and Main Road in Mattituck, NY A. Statement of Ownership and Interest. Tartan oil Corp. property known and referred to as is(are) the owner(s) of M.:=!r~.:=!t-(')(')k.:=! T..:=!T'lP ~l1r1 Mfi n Wf'l.:ln ouse No., Street, Ham et) M.:lt-i-i+-llrk identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section ll~, Block 3 Lot(s) 9 " which is not (is) on a subdivision Map (Filed - "Map of " Filed Map No. and has been approved by the Southold Town Planning Board on as a [Minor] [Major] Subdivision). The above-descri bed property was acqui red by the owner on 1 1 Il n! 1 q 77 B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therefor in said ordinance and would not be detrimental to property or persons in the nei ghborhood for the fo 11 owi ng reasons: Si te is present 1 improved by retail gasoline service station. The self-serVice aspect such use will have no impact upon the surrounding neighborhood. Such a use is reflective of the demands of the pUblic and the costs of gasoline and petroleum products. Self-service now accounts for more than 80 percent of petroleum sales. The proposed use will comply in a ways with the requirements of sections 100-70 b4 and 5 (see add'l pg.) C. The property which is the subject of this appl ication is zoned B-1 ai [xl is consistent with the use(s) described in the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished herewith. L ] is not consistent with the Certificate ()f Or.cupancy being furnished herewith for the following reason(s): ~OU~TY i ~F v~~~nLWd. ~~r[f2 ~ STATE OF NEW YORK) sS.: ( 1 sworn~o b fore me this l.ltlciay of .It1"'j , 19J). /., 7 "'-;"J- /~Y-z~ (Nota u lC PATRICIA.. C. MOORI: rioT ARY PUe.llC, Slil'eQ.1 .Ncw York ZB2 (rev. 2/6/86) Ncl\.4S61668,SuflolkCounty CommlU.lon bplre5 JlInel6. 1981 , - <::..:..;;.:.,~~~ -------"- - --- , TARTAN OIL CORP. SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION PAGE 2 B. cont'd. to insure the safe and orderly use of the pro~erty. The proposed use will not adversely affect the health, safety, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town. The character of the use and development of uses in this zoning district will not be affected by the approval of partial self-service on this property. Nor will the proposed use adversely affect property values. Partial self-service will not unduly increase vehicular traffic con- gestion. Nor will such a use have effect on the availability and adequacy of water and sewer resources. No additional parking demands will be created by the proposed use and there will be no additional noxious gases, odors, dust,light, vibration or noise by approval of partial self service facilities. The fire suppression system will reduce risk of injury and property damage. The propo sed use will not produce overcrowding or undue concentration of people on the property. Petitioner proposes that southerly side of southern island provide full service operation with balance of southern island and northern island to provide self-service. In addition kerosene and diesel pumps are proposed to be self-service. Diesel and kerosene are standard petroleum products offered for sale at gasoline servjce stations. Motorists using diesel and keresene are penalized with higher prices if such products must be provided only on a full-service basis. In addition, many operators, particularly truck operators, prefer to pump their own fuel. Such preference is still penalized with higher fuel prices if full-service must be offered at that pump. '":- ~'-'-~-~ :( FonM NO.3 ( TOWN OF SOUTHOLl) llUILDlNG DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF D1SAI'PIWV ^ L Date ..~..J............, 19.$.1. To .w"..,...m~.X.'r.~..~..~. ~~.~,...c:R~.~..... >>'l~<A-.. t\?:':1.'. .l.J.h.),........ ~~ 11- ~-1.7</ File No. ..,..,......................... . PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application duted .,. }Y,j.Q.?\-~. . !.7. . . . . . . . .. 19.87. . forl'cnllit to construct ..""1.. ~"7:J.~.,. .l?1~.t., .~~...................... at Location ofl'roperty ........... .fr1.~ .-I.~."i:...... !'J.1~ f?:.~... .M~.cA- 'House No. Streot II.:}fnlfJt County Tax Map No. 1000 Section . .'. . ! /.~. . . . ,l3Ioek .....9. ~ . . . . Lot . .C? ~. . . . . . . . . Suuuivision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '" Filed Map No. ............,... Lot No. ..........'....... is relurne,1 herewith Jnu disapproved 011 the following grounds Q.,:4m)J][. ~ ~.I.o:o. -:7.D\~.~) r~~ '~b ~.~ .~~. .~f~~ .4<~'1:~.~ .';,.~.~... I ..... ..... ... ..... lluild illg Inspector nv tleo " ~~- . I j ~.~'. . ! Vl , I V\ ~ 'J . \j I I ! II i~ ? m ~ v 1:1 1\ l/l q) 40'. O":t '. v ., < I ! s o IV E.LlO of PA.......r? N <\J o -j Vl, A5 p~ALr f"AVr: + 9".'n ~ '7.12- I I "3!;"O" $ETOAG14 L..JG~ (c..O&) 5:0' E:iSli.J'.o. S,~.J i C...K. eME' ~'G.u 12"0' ,...,A...~i. r"':'" r Y-o (G;J(5T..i;. AWE" L..T~. ---) ""1~ :7~ Cr.l..,a.'$.~ -" / ( CE\~ PooL- ) \ j -- I I .. I I ~ Tv." r._',',.' (! . EoIir~ e"'f / .,d",~- :- ~ , .' '_ L/t~F..,;',.;;J -- I +'}';l.S:S' ! i 24"0' >( 5~:o' CAoJ~f''i "'1"'<:" !:SLAoJ05 I I 7S"0" fJ83'.40' -00 +,.....2.. E --"-------- .~ - ... ... .~I -I I , "', \. ~~.,..--. >I I; .. 7-":';- 11'*'.) I; ~ .. .\: rr b ~ " , -'.cc-+~ (;,.",oP'i,. ('OL .' .~. '. ',".( '. C C~J~f ,'''.-' ~ . E.. .1._, ",' ~!!'!i'l TvJ~) ~,4y \"-f:-L..,..i(~~~ TATloJ ; --==1=.-....;..~--J...-,:::c~_'--,= :'_-~-' ...---.-.--...- - J~~~ ~V , tr J~ r"! C1/Er~ !:$LAJ D:': ~ ... a '" -I I .,; {;.".pt Col., VE..aJj (2ISEQ<:; -."\ l ,'rOf2~E IT I ~ ")[fIC.~_ -;;,. /~ / ! /1 ." / I .-( v I J / . <?~/ r,r(/ ,0/'/' / ~.'I-/ /' // +-".>~ .!:L; :; yJ f r ~) '. (~,.JOf"( To E'K'TC,J,.J t:J"fi;:~ 'E.'J,(':TC'. -l- .".S!; , , f I I I I I. I M I i ~ a 1 , ~ /.r~..u.;.. ~ . '. ~ -' ctI Ii) .74"0' CA.JcPf CAJ4Py ~ . , -.' EKs",.Z::si.""" 0;:> J- i I I J-- + 'oo.?S ,,--_... "~I : ~. f.. ~--~ -....- .-.---. -!f!t: ~-';1~S;"'. ... ,:_..l;, ~- . ~ )i'"fi..<Jl: , -,.~_~'t- .;:J' "" . " I ________I '1 -. -- -'., ~~ ~ .--. - 'i" i, J} ~.y t: f:.Jr-- 0:": ./ ~~./:.- V"'" - c /' I: '- .' ,';.tI_/ {;i"'</-'.'J"";.' CC'c. r~ ",', I,c"..JO. LU"1"',..._, d-\'.~7'..- K:"=j'/I<;;"',_ PU"1i' Lr~' ~ ~ , u i I / I I I i /-- ~ I ) "'__ 35', D~ ~("E:rt;AC"':':' LluE"'-_ ..- (.-::"OOL) + 10 ~ 0 !'_' I / I ) ~ i I f i wi 01 r\., ;;,1 (" 0' I I 102. G.? "'.~': I 1 I I , +101.52 i-la~. So!;: ~+IOI.4Q ~... -........ ~ _ 0...--. i r;,j tr'/ / (?! -' I ! , , J 1 i !-t-[O"!1.I: , I i ; " IJj ."i J.-.,j ", ~/ .... ~ I I I / \.' 'I u/ , .' .' I. i l .J li I ~'j .;: I I '0 J [0; i / O\.v'df!f~2... ----.-.- R~~:.'" l~r~:"E'-'l'\ ,~;':? F;.rz~""r-,.I .JoLl..c> Me::~';llLE. '.}.r- WILLIAM D. MOORE PATRICIA C. MOORE KAREN SZCZOTKA. SECRETARY MOORE Be MOORE I " ),.1 ~ i! ' I i.'{ I 1 p l ~ I"I! .', 8 " WI... t .,....- '- j...,.....,:J L -~~-,:--'''''''':~'~~_i snUTHULD ~.I:':,':'~ "Lli,,;,'JI\)("\ ,-'-"','no 1-,.1'.'1"')2:l~_ I ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 3 CLAUSE COMMONS MAIN ROAD P.O. BOX 23 MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 1 1952 (51 6) 298~5674 FACSIMILE (516) 298-5664 July 26,1989 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Melissa Re: Tartan Oil/Peconic Mobil Tartan Oil/Mattituck Mobil Dear Melissa:, Please have an inspection of the Tartan Oil/Peconic Mobil property. The light shields requested by the Planning Board have all been installed.' I understand that this was the final item required by the Planning Board before a Certificate of Occupancy would be issued. Please advise me of the status of the review of the site plan submitted for the Mattituck station. Also, please advise if you would like the applicant's engineer to discuss the developments of the site plan design as he has proposed it. Thank you for your attention to these matters. uly YOill~' "\ '~ . am~. 00 WDM\kts cc: Tartan Oil Corporation SiLtlJFi~ !?Ie., MOORE & MOORE Attorneys at Law 315 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 William D. Moore Patricia C. Moore Tel: (516) 298-5674 Fax: (516) 298-5664 Thomas F. Moore Of Counsel Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 uUJ: ~~ Attention: Mr. Bob Kassner Re: Tartan oil Dear Mr. Kassner: As per our telephone conversation, oil Corp. check no. 2281 in the environmental form. enclosed please find Tartan sum of $400.00 for the Very truly yours, ~'8,uer~.r~~~ Moore & Moore By: Margaret Rutkowski /mr Ene. J SOUlHOLO J~~o~ -..1 ~~G"""""". J - - ---~------- --- --------- ----------....---.... f ...--- ..,-p /-U. Jv 2811 ;. SfJ 67 .~ jJ~J-~cr~~~~~"" '. . ~~~~~~~~) ~;J;;;;;:; ~ ~-fi~~ ~.rv/ ~ 'l ~.fi<~ r /02/";7 /,L>'a~ ~ ..VJ-4M1~:icdd.~ ~~f' ~JK.e_ ~L.,:~ ./~/ r~~ /t7l:)~.~. -1-~ ~ . ~'l.ff=,~, 9~ ~~~-A.L.-~ pu,~~/~~~ I~t~? .~ ,,,,,,--:<047;> _ ~ ~~=- f~~~~~ ~e ~.~ , , ./ .,.. ." '3'tf,~~~/O P<~ ~~~ ~~ . /Jf.-v~r.c-v- ~r-~ (>~~~ ~....d"~1 ~~~ ~v ?-~) ~ ,/ " . ~ .~) . . ~. ~/vr;14 /~~j/j_~-Q.~~~ 4 02~~, /75< -6/ ,/ ) ~ .~~-I~~~~~~~, ft~~ ~zrv~ s.e.e. /{.7D-I!2-. Ie. ~~ ~~~?V~ ;W--Jo.-<.~ cVLe.#_ 'T /h'~~~ s-~~ ft~~.L/.J- ~~~.~, ;cr JI~{J-t.e ~~ ~/v-c-e~ ~7~ .t!ed.if- ' ~ . ~ " ~.~ ~~5'~ ~?U'~'~ &, ~ ~~-<-.-",-,-_~ ~A':,~ . /]V~~ /1/-/4~_ d~~~/~ ~ ~ ~ /~~ r~~c.d..-- ~~~~ I vd- ~~ //-~. k~'}/L6. --z..,/ - ~~ N d!eU<./ ~ "~ ,~ - ---- """!'lI'" ...- ~ . ~~ ,'/~~~ /~t? ~~~/&~~~~~~f-L :.i ~d~ ~ 4L/U ~/ ::d~~~H!'~~ 0/ ~ ~~a:r- ~ ~~~c-IbG~~ /--e~~ 6 ~ ,.1 , , .'i ::i ~~p ~~ /ft~~~ ;! 1 .vr ~~~. / ~~ , ~~ t(:{; ii ':1 i:1 II II b-( ~~ ~ a<2- a.-.~~~ ~. ~~~./b--~~~~ F~r/" ~A~ L"~.lk' t!LRe~' .,,?~~ A . A <l.e ~ '1 '~r- f, ~r IV "a~~~'~T1ii ~~;a ~- ~~ !I ~~~r:,2~~ V t7U--~ 1,1 ~~~<<-- - ~~~J-/ Iii ~r-:f.~o/cZ~~r Iii Ii ~M~~/~~.?-~' 1,1 ~~'_ ~~-r-/~~~~ I![ .~ ~ ~~/~~ 7~ ~~ Iii f~ ~~ 4--~/~~ Iii ~.~~ iil /"""". :,1 i', '11 ill "I 1111 I, : II ,I Ii " .1 II I : :1 " - Q S E A M I h' F 13 F �r r -'-- � SITE �+ ^--�"'� .._ i, MA„� cz-la. t'7i T•f^, ,25+ , _ I 'I"'�. lacaTlea MAP 011 SCALD - II', 20, ill 5GALE I - -m NATU2AL WOOD LA IJ ✓ I. L�ss.1a P`� Ca Ls EttsrL', 9LVG.�^_ I' :tl ' 31or. ELEVATr�oc.,J-�aF C,aJaW �M 24'-0 ENljf OF �n op PAv +9%.v3 ul EYsrG KLOG CUI + oo. rl' +♦99.7.4 i� 1+xowr4eTAI. 94U,JIAz,c,ALts. sL.R1 14'- 0* T^`�'C. A¢LSA._ - A"ALT. 9A4-10s uA4-41x,.1 1 I`, rl ij = III�IiI ` �.�.� { 2• G U� l'AL. pavn,LE WALL : k- J. 1 MPo rrr - _ t ) r �sIn it ! ��41 X40•- G+1c.,MAT .oV., 'Tis4J 9 f 7 Fite01 EI.E✓nrlw.� OF GA:�avy 'G 1 r IV _ .. ! ' 75.11 �+%a.b@ 9%.-)w•4' - +9%'�� +%9.9 � 1. _ , . r 3 u , Ltc.+r IY U4E METAL IJA LI tJE a¢. '�,I Uf NErca¢y At tMA,tL 1 N - g ^ e �� VLA.J) ' A N OR ^; Ur '^r- v 2 a JmrbMex. �1 - II .. Q N u P 'tz 1k�. jl. _ .w _ EksrG, I - �' �7' =' 7 'µ S 12d ° ' �.11 •,SA....cs l+ste .(WM U _., . �L,��aG wN,r& mr, 1 .• i4 _ vilI C i E ,a R x t - '}`-^' " CNJop� rn EYTe U'i Mre Fk. F'Ji:T6,Il . � +1 �ypill PuM ; vts: ,,f.. <TL. RuMv�Ti�ll 4A14J Q <j 42- -r6, rtr ao.}� IGecNJrG 161. PumpIVj� t/ ' .. c tIA1.T ppJT. `� 4•r r.M1 ti 4'A4ST4.}Trkm PCL.aJgif/r.Q *91.61 _.� � .y�r • .,r a 1 ' +9T.SS CLIA (VATeM.I _ � . f _ did 'tlA2mki �evl MsEcve>� VAPAz Ae_eA sitar 7r 1o2a5 �2e Q 1 � - • E.Y411L ._k . r, �.. wl i R.so) ',I �'m,c��aa,�.es;,et Pole TO A- W7-,--4/ p - vY MAr wlr�ysren pia. zrlra. � � - ,.. � - •� L �, � � r t ..�. 10 -4oc+ ,n/ mTAI. Ttw-cam mry n .t C`+l"•�5P- �.GPGr�E � , ". 1 24'0-X 5%b-CA.,aP ' nb62 TS LA t05 ' la Y,l PeLG 1, �• - 1 .�� . ,• '`v,. �IKTVV.9FS� it Ur1VafC Sa Jo py+ ,j V• \ I it a 1,B5 �7"fr�r�2� VA Pok. ul 'AEE>, (-, 'r" 1d�41 TF-MAvsIJ 1 Ij-O' fL„E G2AbE Z`'-o" ¢' Z-0 ' 4 4LA'-5 Lel' IS 11" / 3s:e, Se P'Atk: .,A" AC'�A U .1T 5,0,GE Puce ll.rJ FSLEkATa1-��: ?7' s wEs 0-0-IL tan 4t;f 1A 1.57-,,;I1_ 2' 4 X _ -Y` n�� �/ GJAp+f eQA,J a(..� ku Ajrs-. ''✓ r�""� ,5 z ri'-i,pi '" ". '. a 9N ' Al_G _ ISAtlAJ' : �"�' Llye'-.. LGao-e. ._. `;' ✓� �tyy I ///LO E 6 Ao'IL>,ECNd_UDP�.S. .y Gni I Q T i"P6' AyM -s- Cc TO NWLFOIL �C-�'"A0.,-- O _�F4P , /� J " J, / St"iaLr FIA VT S' lit /- / 9 4`i8Y add .P6'O.P CartIaPY /, .N. IV, E7%o ,/ �� 3}e `fyi Ri N f lY I CCIRREGT �OII' /�Y' ,�. !o/ ✓d.'� r _ �/ a�neMe Lia �:, r if t 3 taG•? oA J7AE � Arr/J� ' "� r ' .', - _ .�f. -- "dr wr ,.a.:....._.._ .•-.......:,. ...__.,�..�..___.1-_._. .. . .- -----_..__._ _�'IG^-- -.,-�....-______._. 'iii w I eJe. Ih E ,,rF`,1�1'1! p,+.�'rt F } , ,L 9G}t�Ee,2`-h'15T' h., - 1 - L.-1e9 au L'xN,ray ,F"r P✓A" y .'' {,}[¢ Z!in -. r . I ' �-�L�A_-.1$05TdS SrreA./LS'•6FWN.T.�1 Pea G, <:a"F4"�•W I� k � 4 #! Ty A160! 415/JEVSE/7 1-0517/oyS !,/ -��2.�- 1yI1_.'N'1�I o=•=17^FAcAwAo�+taiibs.''Fa'$4+Le <^oacc s.dA, Will.ill,.P 0 METAL LI6 AeFALT5. 7G� TE/S /1R�£T arS,n7 S1wt llws.,_� •,r '•r- a. _OAP/ �,!'x LYu�"GZE_4 YI �`M'� �1�* ELD No. oA]� t, ' rievtsls pnl ', 8Yp «. ;M'v'p'• , . 'r _ T�XMAv, S[I 11 000 5s4'c IlT:'.1 �Y..IG. "S'' '1" rff "wdtt�l4. '•f> ,;. " . &xs ',i Aar J _ _ - _ "-' CGN/G C!/„k',A - 201:192 II'�I,' /./I ,R?O~ _ - , I ill _. F� 4,3" '40' - qo" _... ,. �^ r .. - Ta1�Tns._) �1 :_ c:tu.0 �•^• ..e:. . , .,. .., MAO,_� rf � G - - '11� _ '7`3 - /I'��o¢.Dc.' . � ��"' /' .- � IA2'("A'•:} 1�/!'4. 4+P�•rpQEX'+A1 T't4M� ' al e,4,rLs5OW •✓ „ _.. .__ G '• .F`�'. `�..,..". ,.._�.__ ___ G 11 /0/.42 Ce, C, �'. ,Y__. 5- MCMILLf.704401 •sk'?.+. `f.a.A.�t 1al'l� F'a.gaX isl I• b t bti k rf» GCMG . 1/A t 15 9404 O{. "mw ,O�_): wf + v .2i1/st7 Cr/Ied 'C✓✓� __.- UK �U/ lull'..._- -_. .. �y Irk .. \ 4'Zj 3.3. TITLE: _ ..,-._..__._..«�_-._ .""""., '......_ - ._ - ICV „ ip Atst:c 577/f ' :, S,04 gyp _ ', _ �� tZer• o91en. ';LP�n'r wl fi aMt . TL'p ., ' , . - r , ,-.�_. �-.,..-�..-..;,._-�.r� .._ _ •�., � ,r .; _ - mow" - ........, __._.__.._ .�-..+�.-.---....--,•''l�a•c'........_ �rsz'k>�Yra ' 1 T>ln SII, G''`�haP4s' 1 /l/Ef'V GCJIL/� GU/1 +100.07 .,3O-f7", 111 i+10^l.tY4 /� /pr . �.�� rR;ror.+ , Ifs I �T•� ✓fir ® a• . I (zr�.Esr Mr�02A1»a '6A d tJ' -- _ �' tts o tz.n-•wt Illp, i -lo , q JUL 231992 • . . MH 'Q iEt3TYMAryP@_ GBCNAEFF4p ` I ! �11 _ s9 CHEe;aY LANE r�a� w F#QAVE SOuiHOLD�Ju�„ -'� $MITMTOwN M Y-1YZa7 �SX N J B PLAN46 iOAfIDI fill"5:�266 1 - • - I'll SCALE. W 1w��f ;Il 1 Z - ' - l',I� �' /ff�ll �!/1 yL�J�a�J � �C rl.Al' a.✓�TN ,Kiarl^/+� � �W�'.Ji ` ' , 1 I� , I ,. 1