Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-114.-7-14'Heupl~aui~e, New York ,FFR This is 1o c~ify that the ~s~ arrangements ~f water supply inthm /~]~ withatotalof --J lots · e~e ap~ed on the a~e date, 'rhese facilities must cens~clion s~ndards m ef[~ ~ ti~e time of construction. ~h~s app~ ~fl be valid ~ly i~ ti~e ~ent said subdivision/devel- opment plan.is duly filed t~h t~ Coun~ Cl~k ~thin 6 months of this d~e. ~nt is he,c. ,,' ~ ~r t~ filin~ of this map on which ~is ~t ~m' APPROVED BY ~CALE- SO', I" V,/E HEEE~'y C[R. TIFy TN~iT klO LOT ~r~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 3uly 17, 1990 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Sidney Olmsted 53-120 212th Street Bayside, New York 11364 RE: Minor Subdivision Sidney W. Olmsted, Jr. Robert W. Olmsted SCTM9 1000-114-7-14 Dear Mr. Olmsted: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 16, 1990. WHEREAS, Sidney W. Olmsted, Jr. and Robert W. Olmsted are the owners of the property known and designated as SCTM~1000-114-7-14, located on the north side of Westphalia Avenue; 123 feet west of County Road 48 in Mattituck; and WHEREAS, Olmsted, Jr. and this minor subdivision, to be known as Sidney W. and Robert W. Olmsted, is for 3 lots on 3.3 acres; WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on December 5, 1988; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on June 4, 1990; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and Page 2 Sidney Olmsted be it therefore, RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final survey dated April 16, 1990. Enclosed is a copy of the endorsed paper print. The mylar maps, which were also endorsed by the Chairman, must be picked up at this office and filed in the office of the County Clerk. Any plat not so filed or recorded within sixty (60) days of the date of final approval, shall become null and void. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ' Chairman Encl. cc: Charles Watts, Assessors Office Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector · PROJECT I.D. NUMBER NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION · DIVISION OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM //'~- '~-/'~' For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only J"~' PART I ProJect Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. Applican~s~ I 2. Project Name o~ ..... a .... I Same 3. Project location: Municipality Hamlet Mattituck,Town Southoldcou. W 4. Is proposed action: D New [] Expansio~ [] Modificationlalteration Suffolk Subdivision of lot with three (3} houses on it into three (3) lots 5. Descri~ project briefly: To devide a 3.3 acre lot with owned jointly into individual three (3) 'houses ownership.(s) 1220, 1240, 1300 Westphalia Rd. Mattituck, lO00'North Cty. Rt. 48 E/S ?. Amount of land affected: Initially 3 · 3 acres Ultimately 3.3 [] Yes [] No If No. describe briefly [] Re,ldenlial [] Industrial [] Commercial Marine ... [] Parkland/open space ~ Other Yes [] No If yes. list alency(s) and permit/approvals Bd. of Health,NYS EPA. I~ Yes [] NO If yes, list agency name and permlt~approval type T' .Entire lot has Pre. C.O. # Z-15197: Southold Town Bldg. Dept.1-13-87 ne Uouse at 1300 westphalia rd has Southold Town C of 0 #Z-7803 8-3-77, Underwriters Cert. #N164585 6-12-74~ S.C. Bd Health#3-50-80 6-3-74. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE A PPiicant~nA~: name: Signature: S~ny Olmste~and Robert Olmsted Date: 02-25-87 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER Complete application receiw:d Application reviewed at work session MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised submission received Sketch plan approval -with conditions Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewell location Notilication to applicant to include on final map Sent to County Planning Commission Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions revtewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval Final Public tlearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions Endorsement of subdivision 3. 4. 5. 6. 11. 12. MINOR SUBDIVISION 6 copies sketch plan received spot e lewttions sent to Planning Board Meet with Planning Board Required changes sent in writing New submission received Approval of sketch plan Se~t~ letter witlh resolution approving Application and fee If corporation, affidavit of ownership 6 copies of final map Covenants and restrictions Description of property Note on plat that sanitation ans ~ater facilities meet County Board of Health specifications Developer attend meeting (officia-1 submission) Public Hearing within""45 days) Advertised Affidavits of publication Action by Plannzng Board (~ithin 45 days) Sent to County Planning Commiss'i~n Received County's recommendations Filed covenants and restrictions received Authorization and signing of map received SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: COMMENTS: SUBMISsIoN WITHOUT COVER LETTER PLANNING BOARD 2 JUNE 4 )90 i~%terest to the board? Hearing none, any questions from the board? Mr. Ward: I guess we will have to keep this hearing open until we have a resolution from the Town Board to reduce the road specifications. We will petition them and then get back to the applicant. Mr. Latham: No Mr. McDonald: I was wondering if you know that the driveway cuts across your lot number, well they are not numbered, but the larger lot of the two. Is there a right-of-way, do they have a right-of-way, over that lot? Ms. Hagen: lot? Are you talking about the middle lot, the Galver Mr. McDonald: Yes. Ms. Hagen: Yes, there is a right-of-way agreement. Mr. McDonald: A right-of-way agreement on their present driveway or over what is shown on this map? Ms. Hagen: Over what is shown en the map. If there are any variations that should have been corrected that will be done. There is no problem. Mr. McDonald: Thank you. Ms. Scopaz: No. Mr. Orlowski: Being there are no further questions, I'll entertain a motion to keep this hearing open because of the right-of-way specifications. Mr. Ward: So moved. Mr. McDonald: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. Mr. Orlowski: Olmstead, Jr. is for three Next order of business at 7:35 p.m. Sidney & Robert W. Olmsted - This minor subdivision lots on 3.3 acres located on the north side of PLANNING BOARD 3 JUNE 4, ~90 Westphalia Avenue; 123 feet west of Mattituck. SC%~ ~1000-114-7-14. County Road 48 at Mr. Orlowski: We have proof of publication in both local papers and at this time everything is in order for a hearing. I'll ask if there are any objections to this subdivision? Hearing none, are there any endorsements of this subdivision? Mr. Olmstead: Good evening, I just want to say that we have everything in order. We have our Board of Health approval, we have our DEC approval and we've been through the Zoning Board of Appeals whether or not it is necessary at this point I don't know. I just think we are ready to go and I want to thank the board in educating me in the ways of the board's workings and I thank you very much ahead of time and I'm ready to go. Mr. Orlowski: O.K., any other endorsements of this subdivision? Hearing none, any questions from the board? Board: No questions. Mr. Orlowski: Being no further questions, I'll entertain a motion to close the hearing. Mr. Ward: I move we close the hearing. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? Ail those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr.. McDonald, Mr. Orlowskio Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. Mr. Orlowski: Next order of business at 7:40 p.m. is for Pauline W. Ketcham - This lot line change is located on the corner of Hamilton Avenue and Glenwood Road at Cutchogue. SCI~M ~1000-137-5-17. Mr. Orlowski: We have proof of publication is both local papers and at this time everything is in order for a final hearing. I'll ask if there are any objections to this lot line change? Hearing none, are there any endorsements of this lot line change? Hearing none, any questions from the board? Board: No questions. Mr. Orlowski: No further questions, I'll entertain a motion to close the hearing. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone ~516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 5, 1990 SCOWl' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Sidney Olmsted 53-20 212th Street Bayside, New York 11364 RE: Minor Subdivision for Sidney W. Olmsted, Jr. and Robert W. Olmsted SCTM~ 1000-114-7-14 Dear Mr. Olmsted: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 4, 1990. The final public hearing, which was held at 7:35 p.m., was closed. As requested previously, the Planning Board awaits the following: 2 additional paper maps with a current stamp of Suffolk County Health ]Department approval. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~5 Chairman LEGAL ~ Notice of Public Hearina NOTICE IS HI~EBy GrvI~N that pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law, a public hearing ~ be held by the Southold Town Plan- ning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town ~o the 4th day of Jtme, 1990 on the qucstiun of the following: 7:30 p.m. final approval of the minor subdivision of Baxter Sonnd Estates located at the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and the State of New York. Suffolk Cotmty Tax Map Number. 1000-72- 2-2,1 &3. The property is bordered ~m the north by the Long Island Smznd, and by lind now or formerly of Gal- lagher, on the mt by land now or formerly of Baxter PropoSes. inc,; on the south ~y land now 'or formerly of Sin~hick and by land now or fofrnerly~f Krupeki; and e~ the west by lknd now or fo:merly of Swiatocha. .7:35 p.m. Final approval of the mmor subdivision of Sidney W. Ohnsted, Jr. and Robert W. Olmsted located at the Town of Sonthold, County of Suffolk and the State of New York. Suffolk County Tax map Number. 1000-114-2-14, The property is ~o~d~ c~ th~ north by Mattituck Creek; on the east by Mattituck Creek; on the sm]th by Westphalia Avenue; and on the west by land now or ~o~rmedy of Guller. 7:40 p.m. Final approval of a lot line change for Pauline W. Ketcham located at the Town of. So~thold, County of Suffolk ~-'.d the State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number. 1000-137-5-17. The property is borde~d on the north by land now or formerly of Edward and Ano Krchs; on the e~st by land now or formerly of James McKJllop; on ~ Glen- wood Road; ao the west by Hamil- ton Ave~que, 7:45 p.m, Final approval of a lot line change for Sean M, Delehanty, located at the Town of Southold, Coonty of Suffolk and the State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number, 1000-107-01-13 & 14, The property is bordered on the north by land now or formerly of Hany bL Kmse, and by ]~nd now or formerly of Carol K. Ely; on the east by land now or formerly of Al- bert Monsell; o~ the south by land now or formerly of Sames Kllkenny, and by land now or formerly of Patrick C. mm~ns, and by land now or forraedy of Daniel Sullivan and Ma~a~t Havens, and by land now or formerly of Hans Rein, and by land now or formerly, of Ralph Nofi; on the west by Knoliwood Lane, Any person desitins to be heard at the time and place specified. Dated: May 16, BY ORDER OF 'Vr~ SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Benneu Orlowski, Jr, CHAIRMAN 6683-1TMv24 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Yvonne Lieblein of Mattituck, in said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly Newspaper, published at Mattituck, In the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published In said Newspaper once each week for 1 weeks successively, commencing on the 24 day of _May 19 qfl ,~, i -~ / ( ': PrincipaIClerk LEGALS NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV- EN that pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law, a public hear- ing will be .held by th~ Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, M'aii~ Road, Southold, New Y6~k in said Town on the 4th d~ of June, 1990 on the question of the following: 7:30 p.m. Final approval of the minor subdivision of Baxter Sound Estates located at the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and the State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-72-2-2.1 & 3. The property is bordered on the north I~ the Long Island Sound, and by land now or formerly of Gallagher; on the east by land now or formerly of Baxter Properti~:S, Inc.; on the south by land now or formerly of Simchick and by land now or formerly of Krupski; and on the west by land now or formerly of Swiatocha. 7:35 p.m. Final approval of the minor subdivison of Sidney W. Olmst~l, Jr. and Robert W. Olmsted located at the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and the State of New York. Suf- folk County Tax Map Number 1000-114-,%14. The property is bor~l~red on the north by Mattituck Creek; on the east by Mattituck Creek, on the south by Westphalia Avenue; and on the west by land now or formerly of Guiler. 7:40 p.m. Final approval of a lot line change for Pauline W. Kctcham located at the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and the State of New York. Suf- folk County Tax Map Number 1000-13%5-17. The property is bordered on the north by land now or formerly of Edward and Ano Krebs; on the east by land now or formerly of James McKillop; on the south by Glenwood Road; on the west by Hamilton Avenue. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ss: STATE OF NEW YORK Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watchman once each week for ...................... //.... weeks successively, commencing on the ........... ' .......... dayof . . ,,~ /' "~ " ........ / ...... , 19 .~."... Sworn to before me this :' day of 7:45 p.m Final approval of a Notary Public lot line change for Scan M. Delehanty, located at the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and the State of New York. Suf- folk County Tax Map Number lO00-10?-Ol-lJ :",~ ,t4. The property'it bordered on the north by land now or formerly of Harry M. Kruse, and by land now or formerly of Carol K. Ely; on the east by land now or formerly of Albert Monsell; on the south by land now or formerly of James J. Kilkenny, and by land now or formerly of Parick Commins, and by land now or formerly of Daniel Sullivan and Margaret Hawms, and by land now or formerly of Hans Rein, and by land now or formerly of Ralph Nofi; on the west by Knollwood Lane. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the time and place specified. Dated: May 16, 1990 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. CHAIRMAN IX-5/24/90(3) New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Recu!atorv ~ ~F Unit - _ _ ~airs Region I Bldg. ~0, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook, NY 11794 {516) 751-7900 AMENDMENT TO PERMIT Former Per'it # Henry G. Williams Commissioner Your recent request to extend the above permit has been reviewed pursuan~ to 6NYCRR, Part 621. It has been determined that there has not been a material ohJnge in environmental conditions, relevant technology or applica01e law or regulations since the issuance of the existing permit; therefore, the ex~i~ation da~e is extended to ~/21 /~ ~iL~ 'four recent reauest to modify the above permit has been reviewed pursuanu to 6NYCRR, Part 621. It has been determined that the proposed modifidations will not substantially change the scope of the permitted actions or the existing permit conditions. Therefore, the permit is amended to authorize: This !et~_ is an ~r amendment to posted at the job site. All other terms and conditions the original permit and as such, shall be remain as written in the original permit. Very truly yours, Deputy Regionak~Permit Administrator Sent PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 15, 1990 SCO'I'F L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Rom P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Sidney Olmsted 53-20 212 Street Bayside, NY 11364 RE: Minor Subdivision Sidney W. Olmsted, Jr. Robert W. Olmsted SCTM9 1000-114-7-14 Dear Mr. Olmsted: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 14, 1990. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, June 4, 1990 at 7:35 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated April 16, 1989. Please contact this office if you have any further questions. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM~: COPIMENTS: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Soothold, New York 11971 SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 5, 1990 Sidney Olmsted 53-20 212 Street Bayside, New York 11364 RE: Minor Subdivision for Sidney Olmsted, Jr. SCTM9 1000-114-7-14 Dear Mr. Olmsted: The Planning Board reviewed the maps dated March 20, 1990, which were submitted on March 26, 1990. Upon submission of five (5) paper prints and two (2) mylars, all containing a current stamp of Health Department approval, the Board will schedule the final public hearing. Please note that the Planning Board requires that all minor subdivisions be filed in the office of the County Clerk. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman ms SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: COMMENTS: SUBMISsIoN WITHOUT COVER LETTER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'I'r L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 March 20, 1990 Sidney Olmsted 53-20 212 Street Bayside, New York 11364 RE: Minor Subdivision for Sidney Olmsted, Jr. SCTM# 1000-114-7-14 Dear Mr. Olmsted: The Planning Board reviewed your submission of March 9, 1990, which included a modified plan for the above mentioned subdivision. The Planning Board is in favor of the general concept of the layout. However, all lots must be in conformance with the minimum requirements of the Town Code. If the lots do not Conform to the minimum requirements of the Town Code, it is possible that you may have to go before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Upon submission of revised maps, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman MI", Bennett Or']owskl~ Chairman Southold Town P]a~)nlng Board Southo]d, N.Y. 1197'1 Dear Mr. Orlow~;kJ: 53-20 212 St. Dayside, N.Y. 11364 March 9, 1990 11:00 AH I1¥-? -fy Thc enclosed ~,odificd plan of our minor subdlvl:~lon is being. ~ubmitted for your scrutiny. Please observe ti,St the ]lne betwee~ lots 1 and 2 and the lines between lots 2 and 3 can be ~oved e~ther way to get equal lot sizes. Note that the ]Jne~% 8re roughly drawn by mc without access to a ~,lanometer. Thank you for' your 8tter, tlon, YOLIPS truly, Sldny OlmsteO 2 990 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'I'r L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 March 6, 1990 Sidney Olmsted 53-20 212 Street Bayside, NY 11364 RE: Minor Subdivision for Sidney Olmsted, Jr. SCTM9 1000-114-7-14 Dear Mr. Olmsted: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 5, 1990. RESOLVED to put the Planning Board's review of the engineer's report dated February 7, 1990 on hold, subject to submission of comments pertaining to the report from the applicant. Please contact this office if you have any problems regarding the above. Very truly yours, ?. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman ~$ enc.: engineer's report Sidney B. Bowne, P.E.. L.S. (1922-1959) Chester C. Kelsey, P.E., L.S. Rober~ A. Stanton. P.E, · Robert W. Brown, [.,S. Zabdiel A. Blackman. P.E., tS, Frank J. Anletomaso. P.E. George A. Style. P.E. Jerry O. Almont. P.E, George L. Fagan. Jr., Ph.D., P.E. Frank Capobianco. C.E, Paul F. Stevens, P.E. Roger L. COCChi. P.E. 45 Manor Road Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 (516) 724-0611 .I Roland And~ Francis J. Ly Joseph F. St William T. St Richard B. ~, Thomas R. P'/nchon. kS. February 7, 1990 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Olmsted Subdivision Hamlet of Mattituck (SBB No. 87582) Dear Mr. Orlowski: We have reviewed the above refenced proposed subdivision that the ' 2. and recommend following items be considered prior to final review. Unless a waiver is granted for the private R.O.W the code requires that the typical road section consist of a 4" Stone Blend Base, 2-1/2" Asphalt Binder Course and a 20 ft. wide 1-1/2" Asphalt Wearing Course or double surface treatment. Leaching basins should be installed at the low point in the proposed road to handle storm water runoff. Since two of the existing driveways are not to be used for access, portions of the existing driveways should be removed and the areas topsoiled and seeded. This will prevent unauthorized use. The well for lot no. 3 will be under the right-of-way which could lead to problems in the future. Upon receipt of a revised plan addressing the above comments or your instructions otherwise, we shall hold the computation of t~e bond estimate in abeyance. If we may be of further assistance please give us a call. Very truly yours, ABC:ls cc: Ray Jacobs Ray Dean (SBB) MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY A. BARTON CASS, P']E. ~--"------'-~-- ........ ~ i......-.~.. ~-~ - - · CLEARWATER Sidney B. Bowne, P.E., ES. (1922-1959) Chester C, Kelsey, P.E., ES. Robert A Stanton, P.E. Robert W. Brown, L.S, Zabdiel A. Blackrnan, PE., L.S. Frank J. Antetomaso, PE. SIDN B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 (516) 724-0611 Roland Anders Francis J Lynch Phillip Schlotzhauer Joseph F Stegman William T Styne Richard B Weber George A. Style, P.E. Jerry D. Almont, P.E. George L Fagan. Jr., Ph.D., P.E, Frank Capobianco, C.E Paul F Stevens, PE Roger L. Cocchi, P.E. Thomas R. Pynchon, L.S February 7, 1990 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Olmsted Subdivision Hamlet of Mattituck (SBB No. 87582) Dear Mr. Orlowski: We have reviewed the above refenced proposed subdivision and recommend that the following items be considered prior to final review. Unless a waiver is granted for the private R.O.W the code requires that the typical road section consist of a 4" Stone Blend Base, 2-1/2" Asphalt Binder Course and a 20 ft. wide 1-1/2" Asphalt Wearing Course or double surface treatment. ' 2. Leaching basins should be installed at the low point in the proposed road to handle storm water runoff. 3. Since two of the existing driveways are not to be used for access, portions of the existing driveways should be removed and the areas topsoiled and seeded. This will prevent unauthorized use. 4. The well for lot no. 3 will be under the right-of-way which could lead to problems in the future. Upon receipt of a revised plan addressing the above comments or your instructions otherwise, we shall hold the computation of the bond estimate in abeyance. If we may be of further assistance please give us a call. Very truly yours, ABC:ls cc: Ray Jacobs Ray Dean (SBB) A. BARTON CASS, P.E. MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER ' An Equal Opportunity Em~)loy®r M/F/H Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Sou(hold. New York 1 i971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Robert W. Brown Sidney B. Bowne & Son 45 Manor Road Smithtown, New York. 11787 1989 Dear Mr. Brown The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application to your office for review. Application Name: ~1 2,/ Tax Map No.: Bowne File No.: Hamlet Location: Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated ~"~ Road Profiles (Dated / 89) / 89) lO / 89) :C /~.I 89) Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated / 89) Other (Dated / 89) Sketch Site Plan (Dated 89) Preliminary Site Plan (Dated 89) Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated / 89) Other (Dated / 89) Please develop an estimate of what it will cost to undertake th~ following review of the enclosed plan (s)- Enter the cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send its facsimile to this office. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very Truly Yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: John Cushman, Accounting Department Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 4, 1989 Mr. Sidney Olmsted 53-20 212 Street Bayside, New York 11364 RE: Proposed Subdivision for Sidney W. Olmsted SCTM# 1000-114-7-14 Dear Mr. Olmsted: As discussed at the Planning Board meeting, members of the Board re-inspected the above mentioned property. As a result of the inspection and further review of the proposal, the Planning Board reiterated their previous request which was stated in the July 27, 1989 correspondence. As requested previously, the Board requires that a road to the alternate specifications, terminating in a cul-de-sac, be constructed for access to the three lots. Please note that under the alternate specifications, the use of crushed blue stone aggregate is an option for construction of the wearing course. The Board has waived their previous requirement that the right-of-way be excluded from the lot areas. The area for the right-of-way should be included in the lot area so as to avoid the creation of lots with irregular shapes. Upon submission of final maps (2 mylars and 5 paper prints) in accordance with the above and containing Health Department approval, a final hearing date will be scheduled. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. // Very tr~ly/yo~ /// Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 ~kr. Sidny Olmsted 53-20 212 St. Bayside, N.Y. 11364 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suly 27, 1989 RE: Proposed Subdivision for Sidney W. O!msted SCTM~ 1000-114-7-14 Dear Mr. Olmsted: As discussed at a previous Planning Board meeting, the Planning Board reviewed your subdivision proposal at their work session. As requested previously, the Board requires that a road to tile alternate specifications, terminating in a cul-de-sac, be constructed for access to the three lots. A copy of Section Ai08-42 which describes the alternate specifications has been enclosed for your assistance. Please note that under these specifications the use of crushed blue stone aggregate is an option for construction of the wearing course. The Board has waived their previous requirement that the right-of-way be excluded from the lot areas. The area for the right-of-way should be included in the lot area so as to avoid the creation of lots with irregular shapes. Upon submission of final maps (2 mylars and 5 paper prints) in accordance with the above and containing Health Department approval, a final hearing date will be scheduled. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. BE~ET'r ORLO'dSKI, JR. CHAIR~ 53-20 212 st. Bayside, N.Y. 11364 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Sir(s); I would like to have the oppertunity to appear with or before you to discuss my attempt to subdivide my (with my brother) lot with three (3) existing houses. I have been working on this for three years, and I would like to resolve the problems and complete it. t4AY I 6 19i!6 ~ SUBMISSIONS WITHOUT COVER LETTERS PHONE NUMBER: Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 South01d. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING' BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 18, 1989 Charles Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Division Suffolk County Dept. of Planning Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11787 RE: Robert & Sidney Olmstead SCTM 01000-114-7-14 File: S-SD-89-02 Dear Mr. Lind: Enclosed please find correspondence addressed to Mr. Olmstead regarding your correspondence of March 3, 1989. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Verl~-~truly yours, ~.~ ~,~ 1'./ , / / .'~./ / /" ,'0 / .'" . .'.' / /' z,.~" , ;..,--,---.., .... ×, BENNETT OR%.OWSKI , JR. CHAIRMAN enc. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE' TOWN OFSOUTHOLD April 18, 1989 Sidney Olmstead 53-20 212 Street Bayside, NY 11364 R7~ Robe£t & Sidney Olmstead SC~,I ~1000-114-7-14 Dear Mr. Olmstead: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, April 17, 1989. It was RESOLVED that the three lots being created would be best serviced by a common road terminating in a cul-de-sac. The road is to be located in the right-of-way which is shown on the map. Access to the three lots will be over the common road, and the separate driveways which currently exist, must be eliminated. Road profiles must be submitted for review by the Town Engineer. Road specifications must be in accordance with the alternate road specification (Section A106-33C). The road must also terminate in a cul-de-sac. This cul-de-sac must have a minimum right-of-way radius of fifty (50) feet. The Planning Board also reviewed the Suffolk County Planning Commission report dated March 3, 1989. The following comments will be sent to the Planning Commission: In response to the County comment in reference to the creation of substandard lots: The Planning Board will submit a copy of the variance which was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals for insufficient area of Lots ~1,2, and 3; and insufficient width of Lot ~2. In response to the County comment that the proposed subdivision will result in the creation of parcels that do not have frontage on an existing or proposed public road: The Planning Board requested that all lots have access from a road which will be built to alternate Town Specifications (see resolution above). In response to the County comment that adequate restrictions be placed on the property to protect Mattituck Creek: A seventy-five (75) foot setback from wetlands is required by the Town Code. This setback will address any future development of the parcel. Upon submission of revised maps eliminating the existing driveways, and road profiles, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. cc: SCPC enc. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING CO~UNTY OF PATRICK {~. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE PL~MNING BO.~RD LEE E. KOPPELMAN DIRECTOR OF F~LANNING March 3, 1989 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - Sidny W. Olmsted, Jr., and Robert W. Olmsted Northerly side of Westphalia Avenue approximately 123 feet westerly from Middle Road, C.R. 48, Mattituck, New York Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Co~nission at its regular meeting on March 1, 1989, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Sidny W. Olmsted, Jr., and Robert W. Olmsted" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. After due study and deliberation it resolved to disapprove said map for the following reasons: Creation of a subdivision with substandard lots, that is, lots whose areas are less than the minimum require~ by the zoning classification of the property, constitutes an overintensification of land use in a groundwater sensitive area in what is meant to be a low density area. Such action could establish a precedent for future subdivision of this kind which would essentially be a circumvention of the Town Board's action taken over the past years to upzone these groundwater sensitive areas. The proposed subdivision will result in the creation of parcels that that do not have frontage on an existing or proposed public road. The creation of such lots is contrary to good subdivision layout principles and creates problems as far as access by emergency and service equipment is concerned. This lack of access could result in health, safety and welfare problems for the future residents of such lots, not to mention potential disputes over the use and maintenance of any right-of-way over an adjacent parcel that may be created for the purpose of access. VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE. L.I. NEW YORK 11788 Minor Subdivision - Sidny W. Olmsted Jr., and Robert W. Olmsted Page 2 3. No information was provided indicating that adequate restrictions would be placed upon this property to protect Mattituck Creek from any potential impacts resulting from the future development or improvement of this property. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Acting Director of Planning File: S-SD-89-02 CGL:mb Encl.: Map by ~-~ ~ ~>~J Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Division cc: R. Villa, P.E., SCDHS ,0 SUFFOLK CO~NTY T OF SERV Hauppaug~,' N e~-Y. ock This is to certify Lh'~t th s and sewage di~3(~al fo ~ _ inthe ~~ [ ,, .wtth 3totalc ~ ~-~rn~ed on t~e aoov~ date. T~ese faci~.ues m~s~for,~ ;¢~-standards in 4ffect at the time pt co~c~n...~h? approval lh~ll be valid onl~ in the event sa~d ~diw~e~- opment plan is duly fi ed w~h the County Cte~w~h~'~onths of this date./ Consent is hereby given for th~/fiting~f th s mad on ' o~ement a ears n the Offi~ of the County Clerk in which this en~ . . PP .... ' I k ~d~:~i;i~ ~r°v'~'°ns °f the Pubhc Health Law an~'~e Surf° ~e~or~Division!of Environmental Qua~ -- /AIN St S l DNY.,./\ TO',; v~L L ~. . ,SUBDIVISION- 07_L AI',,t b OL&ST~ D, J,r2. "~. 0 L&STiE D -T I T UC l/_.. ~ $0U~4 OLD, N.V, lz'. = I^Oklut,\F¢..MT ~ol'..)r.f~ldK VANTUYL, R C. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Suffolk County Planning Commission Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11787 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section 1333, Article XIII of the Suffolk County Charter, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed final plat to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Tax Parcel Identifier No. Material Submit.ted: Minor Subdivision - Class A(3 copies) ~ Class B (2 copies) Major Subdivision (3 Copies) Preliminary Map (1 copy) ; TopograFnic Map (1 copy) ; Darinage Plah (1 copy) ; Street Profiles (1 copy) ; Grading Plan (1 copy) ; Planning Board Res. (1 copy) ; Other material (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet C orrunents: 4~ '. ~r14~ ~ ? ~;~_ V~ry truly yours, , ~ennett Or]c,,.,,-t*-' .._ ' ~3 rODErICk VaN TUyL, P.C. 21S FRONT STREET GReEnPOrT, NEW YORK 11944 5 ~ 6.4779 ! 70 January 20, Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 1989 Re: Wild Oats subd. Gentlemen: Attached hereto are the separate plans for the Olmsted subdivision in Mattituck, and the road profile for "Wild Oats" in Peconic, for which please pursue the usual steps for approval. Thank you. Yours truly, R. Van Tuyl rtem # MLSN72 c; Wheeler Group Inc 1982 FOLD AT (--) TO FIT DRAWING BOARD ENVELOPE # EW10P COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ® PATRICK (~. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING (516) 360-5207 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11901 December 19, 1988 Preliminary.__ Final X__ Plat Name: Minor Subdivision - Sidny W. Olmsted, Jr. and Robert W. Olmsted Location: n/ely/s Westphalia Avenue, Mattituck, New York T.P.I.N. 1000-114-7-14 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Please be advised that pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the above referral will not be reviewed by the Suffolk County Planning Commission because of noncompliance with requirements for notice and maps as stipulated in Informational Bulletin #8 of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. The following material is required before referral will be reviewed: 1 copy of proposed grading plan 1 copy of proposed road profiles 1 copy of proposed drainage plan 1) 2) 3) Bearings on all lot lines Total area of subdivision }if requirements are being waived a }statement to that effect must be }submitted with referral Tie distance to nearest street Very truly yours, File: 1333-D-88-131 CGL:mb NOTE: Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning ¢ Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Division Please consult Suffolk County Department of Planning Informational Bulletin No. 8 for complete referral requirements. VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE. L.I.. NEW YORK 11788 (516) 360-5192 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1935 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD December 27, 1988 Sidney Olmsted 122- Westphalia Road P.O. Box 436 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposal for Sidney and Robert Olmsted SCTM9 1000-114-7-14 Dear Mr. Olmsted: Enclosed please find a copy of the Suffolk County Planning Commission review dated December 19, 1988. The Planning Board inadvertently did not send the Commission a copy of the waiver pertaining to the grading, drainage and road profiles. This will be sent to the Commission by the Planning ~Oard. Please submit numbers 1, 2, and 3 as asked for by the Commission. Upon submission of this information, the Planning Board will forward it to the Commission along with the waiver pertaining to the grading, drainage and road profile. Please contact this office if you have any questions.  Very ~ru~~ //~ / 7~? \ ,/,,; ~ t~ ../~V~'-~ //, CHAI~AN enc. CC: Roderick Van Tuyl Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 76S-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County Planning Commission Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11787 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section 1333, Article XIII of the Suffolk County Charter, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed final plat to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (Map of) (Minor Subdivision) ~ ~ Class B (2 copies) Hamlet Tax Parcel Identifier No. Material Submitted: Minor Subdivision - Class A(3 copies) Major Subdivision (3 Copies) Preliminary Map (1 copy) ; TopograLnic Map (1 copy) ; Darinage Plan (1 copy) ; Street Profiles (1 copy) ; Grading Plan (1 copy) ; Planning Board Res. (1 copy) ~ ; Other material (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements Comments: - See attached sheet Very truly yours, RODERICK VAN TUYL, P.C. 218 FRONT STREET GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 TO DATE i)C~ {: · SUBJECT 000-114-7-14, for ,~our review m~d~or .~ ._ , PC item # ML5N72 Wheeler Group Inc 1982 FOLD AT (--) TO FIT DRAWING BOARD ENVELOPE # EW10P Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 7, 1988 Mr. Sidney Olmsted 1220 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 436 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Sidney and Robert Olmsted SCTM ~1000-114-7-14 Dear Mr. Olmsted: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 5, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board make a determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act of non-significance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours. L BENN~T' ~ LOWS K I, J R. ~ ' CHA RMAN - eric. it Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD 12/05/88 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR part 617, Section 617, Section 617.10 and chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency for this unlisted action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The minor subdivision of Robert and Sidney Olmsted is two lots on 3+ acres located at Mattituck. SCTM 91000-114-7-14. The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. ,. Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Further information can be obtained by contacting Jill M. Thorp, Secretary $outhold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk county Planning Commission NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Thomas C. Jorling, DEC Commissioner Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Applicant Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: All involved agenceis From: The Planning Board office RE: Subdivision of Olmsted SCTM #1000-114-7-14 Date: October 25, 1988 Enclosed please find the Long Environmental Assessment Form for this minor subdivision located at Mattituck. The first request for your review was sent to you on September 14, 1988, inwhich the Long Environmental Assessment Form was inadvertently left out. Thank you Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($16) 76S -! 938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 25, 1988 Re: Lead Agenc~ Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. your interest in assUming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF)to assist you in your response. Project Name: Requested Action: Robert & Sidney Olmsted SCTM #1000-114-7-14 This proposed minor subdivision is on 3+ acres located at Mattituck. S__EQRA C_~lassification: Type z Unlisted Contact Person: Jill M. Thorp 516-765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days o~ the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [~] Other. (See comments below.) Comments cc: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, ~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR ~' CHAIRM3LN _4Beard of-Appoals ~oard of Trustees _~Building Department _Southold T~w~Ecard ~Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services _~IYSDEC- Stony Brook ~YSDEC- Albany _S.C. Dept. of Public Wcrk~ .U.£. Army Cok~ _N.Y.S. Dcpt. cf TransportaL-i~wn * Maps are enclosed for your review _ Coordinating agencies 14-1~-2 (2/87)-- 7c State Environmental Quality Review Purpose: The full CAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full CAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 ~]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonabJy determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant im.pact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may resiJ!f in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared· * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date PART 1--FROJECl ,NFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form PartsA through E. Answers to these quest~%ns will be considere~ as part of the appl cation for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review [ rovide any addition~ information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring snch additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. ' NAME OF ACTION Sidny and Robert Olmsted HinoP Subdiv~s:ion LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) 1220, 1240, 1300 Westphalia I:d. lqatt~i,/ack, S ur. hs r , ~ ~J f' ~' ~} I [~ [ ] O . NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR ADDRESS l~ox 436 CITY/PO STATE Z, IP CODE NAME OF OWNER (if different) H o rrl e ) ~1~ ~1 [~S~ TELEPHONE Division of single lot with three (3.' existi~g into three (3) single lots with seperate ownership. Each house bas existing utilities, wate~ supply~ sewage disposal. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: I~Urban E]lndustrial [~Commercial ~Residential (suburban) C]Rural (norl-farm! [~ Forest E]Agriculture ~Other 2 Total acreage of project area: 3 . 3 acres APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PR S~N'FI.Y AFEER COMPItNON Meadow or Brushland (Non agricultural) acres acres Agricultural (IDc[udes orchards, cropland, pasturb, etc.) ........ ~(~,~ ..... ~cres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) .... acres ........ acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) ..... ~(res ........ Other (Indicate typo)Typleal Buildin$ Lot Trees, Shrubs, Or'ass ~ame 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project sit(!? Sand a Soil drainage: E}Well drained ] SU % oi site {"lModerately well drained OPoorly drained . % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, bow many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYf~ Land Classification System? N,/~ acres (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~Yes ~No a What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed prolec._._ w~th slopes: ~Z]0-10% E]10-15% % ' ' []15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? EYes I~lNo ~". Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? I~Yes ~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 9"' +- (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? []Yes F'INo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [3Yes F~No , 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal Iife that is identified as threatened or endangered? [Yes ~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) I~Yes IV]No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes [~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? I~Yes II~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N'/~. a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name N/A b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~Yes [No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? []Yes [NoConnectings are Existin~ b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? []:]Yes E:]No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2S-AA, Section 303 and 304? E~Yes [~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 E3Yes E~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? filYes C2~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) 3.3 a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled b~ project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: ~/'~ acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing __ I ~ ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hourLess Then'l h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially 3 Existing Ultimately 3 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 2~' height; 30' width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 450~ acres ultimately. Ssme {upon completion of project)? Condominium 24' length. ft. 3 2. How much natt,,M material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? -0 - 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? [Yes E]No ~N/A a. If yes, for what intendeC purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [Yes EINo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [lYes [No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? _~__ iP--_ acres 5. Will any mature, forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by th s project~ [lYes [Z]No ' 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction N/A 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month months, (including demolitiont d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? []Yes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [lYes E}Nc¢~ .~ 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction N A ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [~YesN '~ E~No If yes, explain tons/cubic yards year, (including demolition), 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [~Yes E~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ;[]Yes CJNo Type Sepbtc ~ 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? 5SYes Explain And CesspooLs ~No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? []Yes ~JNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? L~Yes [}No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain [lYes ~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? __ 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides~ ~Yes [lYes ~No tons/month years. ~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [lYes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 21 Will project result in an increase in energy use? [~Yes If yes , indicate type(s) [IYes .~'No 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capactty 24 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 1 200 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~Yes If Yes, explain gallons/minute E~No { ~elis) Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies E3Yes []No [~Yes ~]No 02-87 ~Yes DNo ~oning Appeal '~Approved ~ 07-14-88 ~Yes ~No Site Approval ~ 87-181 Approved ~ 02-05-88 ~Yes ~No ~Yes ~No ~Yes ~No EPA ~ 10-87-0339 Approved ~09-25-87 ~Yes ~No C. Zoning and Planning Information I. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~Yes I~No If Yes, indicate decision required: I~zoning amendment [~zoning variance [~special use permit E]subdivision E]site plan E]new/revision of master plan ~]resource management plan E]other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 2 Acre Res. 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Existing 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 1 Acre 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Same 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? .~Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(sl and zoning classifications within a V~ mile radius of proposed action? I~No Res., Marine, Bus. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a Y~ mile? ~Yes [~No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 40,000 Sq. Ft. 10. Will proposed action require any authorization{s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [~Yes ~No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? [~Yes [~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle proiected demand? I~Yes E}No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~]Yes ~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [~Yes E]No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge Applicant/Spot.for Name /'~ 'S ,'g/'l,/ .~ .'~'~ ~/~.~ ~']'- ~?//'~ .t'~/~ rl, Date com I '/ //' ~' If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, p ere the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. § Part 2--PROJECTIMPACTSt DTHEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significanL Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generallv applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific proiect or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3 · The impacts of each proiect, on each site, in each locality, will vary Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cum[ative effects Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impa.ct, if impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e, If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the proiect to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3~ A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3 IMPACT ON LAND I Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? [ENO [lYES Examples that would apply to cblumn 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%, · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet, · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface, · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove morE, than 1,000 tons of natural material (ie., rock or soil) per year · Construction or expansion of a samtary landfill · Construction in a designated floodway · Other impacts 2 Will there beaneffect t: _.,y u;;.que or unusual land forms tound on the site? (i e, cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc )~NO [lYES · Specific land forms: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated By Impact Project Change LJNo , IJYes !~No z ._J~t S L.N J~ [ .J~es L ' NO , ~Yes No ~ Yes 6 J IMPAOT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) E3NO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? []NO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? [NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacit'~. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conve~,ed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the exte:~t that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? []NO E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Propelled Action would change flood water flows 7 1 ~ 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I~Yes I~INo [] [] I~Yes ~lNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes UNo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~tes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ,~Y~ ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodwav. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? []NO {~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more tl'~an I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas, · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? []NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of an,/ portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ~ Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. ' Other impacts: Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? []NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or m~gratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species, Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of agej or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources~ ~]NO L~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 the proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land {includes crop and hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change i:~Yes [~No ~Yes ~No ~Yes ~No [~¥es ~No ~Yes [~No [~Yes ~No ~Yes ~No ~Yes ~No ~Yes ~No [( ]~Yes ~No ~Yes ~No ~Yes ~No ~Yes ~No ~No ~No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.8. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~INO I~YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Act[on impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? I~NO E]Y[~S Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 E]NO E]YES · Tile permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: 9 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I-lYes I~No [] [] E]Yes [-1No [] [] r-lyes I-1No [] [] E]Yes [-JNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes F-INo [] [] E]Yes []No [] [] E]Yes []No [] [] [~]Yes E]No [] [] []Yes rE]No [] [] E]Yes E]No [] [] E]Yes ' []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [~Yes [] [] []Yes []No IMPAC1 ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Examples that would apply to column 2 E3NO E3YES ·Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the Community's sources of fuel or energy supply? E~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major Commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ~NO E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely {more than bne hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. ~ Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. ' Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? fi]NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pest c des, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly react ve radioactive, irritatng, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids Proposed action ma,/ result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: 10 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] E~ 2 Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change [~Yes []No []Yes []No ~]Yes []No ~Yes ~]No [~Yes L-~ Yes ~]Yes [7~NO ~.Yes L~No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD ~18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existin§ community? [~NO [Z]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to §row by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than'5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] J--lYes J'~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I~Yes []No [] [] []Yes I~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] i-lYes E]No [] [] r--lyes F-1No [] [] []Yes []No 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? FqNO []YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 _£ Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impactls) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 617.21 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual FAF Addendum SEQR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? · National Park SerVice lands? · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? Project and Resource (in Miles) O-~A ~A-V2 ]/2-3 3-5 5+ · Any transportation ?orridor of high exposure, such [] [] [] [] [] as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate [] [] [] [] [] or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as [] [] [] [] [] scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? [] [] [] [] [] · County road? [] [] [] [] [] · State? [] [] [] [] [] · Local road? [] [] [] [] [] 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screen'ed by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) []Yes []No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question ! used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? []Yes [~No DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within '1/4 mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] Forested ~] [] Agricultural [] Suburban residential Industrial [] [] Commercial [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] L~..] Cliffs, Overlooks [] Designated Open Space [] Fiat [] Hilly Mountainous Other [] NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *l/z mile []Yes []No *1 miles []Yes []No *2 miles [~] Yes [~]No *3 miles []Yes [~No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number Of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed ac~on ~: FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work Involved in recreational activities [] [] Routine travel by residents [] At a residence At worksite Other ~ ~ ?~ ] 14-16-2 [2/87)-- 7c Appendix A SEQR State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Purpose: The full FAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of {he broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full FAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project 0[' action. Full FAF Components: The full FAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site, By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be n~itigated or reduced, Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is id~;ntified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important, DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 ~]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this lEAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant im.pact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigal:ion measures described in PAR]' 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONlED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date PART 1--FROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a s~gn f cant eff~ on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consider, as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review Provide any additio~ information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spec each instance. NAME OF ACTION Sidny and Robert Olmsted Hinor Subdivision LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) 1220, 1240/ 1300 Westphalia Rd. Mattituck, Sout~old, Su~'folk NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Sidny and Robert Olmsted (21;3 584-34~b ADDRESS Box 436 CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Mattituck N.Y. ~ ] 9!52 NAME OF OWNER (If different) H O~ e I]~,J~li~l~{S~ TELEPHONE ADDRESS { 7 ] ~-63 I -/~;~5~ CITY/PO '! STATE [ ZIPCODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION £ ..... ~ ........ Division of single lot with three (3) existing houses into three (3) single lots with seperate ownership. Each house has existing utilities, water supply, and sewage disposal. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas, 1. Present land use: ii)Urban Ellndustrial ElCo~'~mercial [~Residential (suburbaa) C]Rura[ (non-farm [IForest ii)Agriculture ~Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 3 . 3 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) .... acres __ acre~ Forested acres ........ acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc) acres .......... ~cres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Art c es 24, 25 of ECL) ..... acres ............... acres Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) ....... ~res Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type)Typical Building Lot Trees, Shrubs, Grass acres Same ...... acres 3. What is p}edom~nant soil type(s) on project site~ _~and a. Soil drainage: [~WelJ drained 1 0U % of s. lte ~Moderat(flv well drained .... % el site F]Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I througtl ,1 of the NY Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [~Yes ~No a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet} 2 5. A~proximate percentage of proposed pOct site with slopes: 3Z]0-10% 1~10-15% I-I15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a buildin[~, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ~lyes ~No (~'. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [Yes 8. What is the depth of the water table;~ ~,t + · ~ {in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~]Yes []No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? []Yes I~No ' 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? i-lYes ,[~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [l-lYes [2]No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ~Yes [~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ~Yes [~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name N/A b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~qYes [No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [~Yes [NoC~nnectings are Existi~ b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? f~Yes [No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2S-AA, Section 303 and 304? [Yes E~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and'6 NYCRR 6177 []Yes E~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? []Yes C3~No C B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of proiect (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by. project sponsor 3.3 b. Proiect acreage to be developed: N/~/~ acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped acres. d. Length of proiect, in miles: (If appropriate) e If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion .proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing __~!_1~ ~; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hourLess Then '1 h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially 3 Existing Ultimately 3 "' i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure --25' height; .~0' width; i. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare prolect will occupy is? 450' 3 acres. acres ultimately, .%; Same (upon completion of project)? Condominium 24' length. ft. 2. How much naturd~ material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be rec a med? [Yes []No ~N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being rec aimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for rec amation? [Yes E]No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes []No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? -O- acres. 5. Will any matur~ forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? [Yes []No If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction N/A multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [Yes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [Yes []NON/~ 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction N A 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this proiect N / h 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? -0 -~ tons/( ubi~z yards months, (including demolition) year, (including demolition). year. Pleasure ~ zanr zng Board [No ~/'A ; after project is complete ~YesN/A [No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [Yes L~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etcJ and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ]E]Yes E~No Type _Septic 14 Will surface area of an existin~ water body increase or decrease by proposal? [~Yes Explain And Cesspools :2No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [Yes ~No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [~Yes {~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. if yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used?~ E]Yes I~No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes no[ go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain ~2Yes 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use I~erbicides or pesticides? CJYes [~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [Yes j~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise lew~ts? [-]Yes 21 Will project result in an increase in energy use? . ~]Yes ~]No If yes , indicate type(s) ,,~'N o 22. if water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 24 _ gallons/minute ( We] ls ) 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 1 200 gallons/day. 24. Does proiect involve Local, State or Federal funding? [Yes E~No If Yes, explain 25~ Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board []Yes ~]No v City, Town, Village Planning Board []Yes City, Town Zoning Board []Yes ONo City, County Health Department []Yes []No Other Local Agencies OYes Other Regional Agencies I~Yes [~No State Agencies I~Yes []No Federal Agencies []Yes I~No Submittal Type Date 02-87 .Zoning Appeal Approvea ~ 07-14-88 Site Approval # 87-181 Approved ~ 02-05-88 EPA # I0-87-.0339 Approved ~09-25-87 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~Yes [~No If Yes, indicate decision required: [~zoning amendment [~zoning variance E]special use permit [~]subdivision [~site plan I'-Inew/revision of master plan []resource management plan []other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 2 Acre Res, 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Existing 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 1 Acre 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Same 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~qYes []Nc 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/~ mile radius of proposed action? Res., Marine, Bus. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '¼ mi[e? [~Yes [~No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 3 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 40,000 Sq. Ft. 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? OYes ~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? OYes ~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? []Yes []]No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? []Yes ~No a. ]f yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~]Yes DNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such nnpact~ and (he measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my k ~owJedge If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. ~ 5 Part 2--PROJECT iMPACTS A, .,THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for an,/ specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3 · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impa.ct, lf impact threshold equals or exceeds any exampte prov ded checkcolumn2.1fimpactwilloccurbutthreshold is lower than example, check column 1. ' d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3 e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3 A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1 Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the proiect site? ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the proiect ar(a exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generaNy within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · ['xcavation for mining purposes that would ~emove mom than 1,OOO tons of natural material (ie., rock or soil) per year · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill · Construction~n a designated floodway · Other impacts 2. WiJlthere beaneffect t: ..,y ur,que or unusual land forms foundon the site? {ie., cliffs, dunes, geological tormat OhS, etc )[~NO ~YES · Specific land forms: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change [~Yes [~No ~Yes ~'~4o IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) []NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. '~ Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? I~NO [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? []NO E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation c~,using any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conve,,,ed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. ' Proposed Action will likelv cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the exte:~t that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities · Other impacts: 6 Will proposed action altb'r' drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Propb~ed Action would change flood water flows. 7 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Moderate Large Mitigated E Impact Impact Project Char [] [] F'3yes [] [] []Yes []~ [] [] []Yes []~ [] [] []Yes []i~ [] [] []Yes []~ [] [] E3Yes []~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~tes ~ ~ ~Yes ~N ~ ~ ~Yes ~N ~ ~ ~Yes ~N ~ ~ ~Yes ~N ~ ~ ~Yes ~N ~ ~ ~Yes ~N ~ ~ ~Yes ~N, ~ ~ ~Y~ ~N~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~N~ · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ' Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ' Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ~]NO [~YES £xamples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land Commi to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. ° Other impacts: __ IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS ~. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 ~NO E~YE$ · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ' Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts:_ Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ~NO IZ~ Y[~ $ Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ~f mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important 'egetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? fi3NO L]Y[SS EXamples that would apply to column 2 he proposed action would sever, cross or-.limit access to agricuJtural nd (includes cropland, haytields, pasture, v neyard orchard, etc./ 8 1 2 Small to Potential Moderate Large Impact Impact Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change ~Yes L~No .~ Yes [] No L~Yes []No l~Yes ~-~No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? []NO []YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21 Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or naturak · Proposed land u'ses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce thei enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of histdric, pre- historic or paleontological importance? [3NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. . · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts:_ IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 [:]NO [3YES ' The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A maior reduction o1: an open space important to the commt nity. · Other impacts: · 9 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potentia Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change ~]Yes [::]No ~Yes I'--INo [~Yes r-INo [:]Yes ['-]No [:]Yes, L":I N o I-lYes [:]No [:]Yes [:]No [~Yes ~]No [~Yes ~]No [:]Yes [~No E~]Yes ' [~No [:]Yes [~No [:]Yes [:]Yes ~]No IMPAc, ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Examples that would apply to column 2 E]NO ~]YES ·Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the COmmunity's Sources of fuel or energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 ~]NO E]YES · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major COmmercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16, Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Act on? Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hosptal school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than 6ne hour per day) · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures · Proposed Action will remove natural barners that would act as a noise screen. ' Other impacts:_ IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7 WJJJ Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Examples that would apply to column 2 []NO E]YES Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances {i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the buriai of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reacbve, radioactive, irritatirR infectious etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable hquids Proposed action may result in the excavahon or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for tile disposal of solid or hazardous Other impacts: 10 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change I~Yes r~No [~Yes EE]No ~Yes [-~No L~Yes E~No L3Yes ~No ~.f~ E3No ~JYes [~No .( L2~'es ~No dyes ~No [~ h'es ~No ~No ~No ?, ~Yes ~No ~Yes ~NO IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? ONO F~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than'5% per year as a result of this project. ' Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: I" I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By impact Impact Project Change [] [] I-'lYes [-']No [] [] []Yes E~]No [] [] []Yes [:]No [] [] [:]Yes I~No [] [] ~:]Yes [:]No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? E]NO E]YES If Any Action in Part 2 is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is conside~-~d to be potentially large, even if the impact{s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. [~riefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change{s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider; · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Ils irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The,regional consequence of tile impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known ob)ections to the proiect relate to this impact. IContinue on attachmentsJ 11 617.21 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum SEQR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? · National Park SerVice lands? · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation gorridor o[ high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated ir~terstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? Distance Between project and Resource (in Miles) 0-¼ I/~. ]/~ 1/2.3 3-5 5+ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] · Municipal park, or designated open space? · County road? · State? · Local road? [] [] .[2 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screen'ed by summer foliage, but visible during or, her ~Yes ~]Mo 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time ol~ year during which the project will be visible? ~Yes [~No DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMEh ~ 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *V4 mile '1 mile Essentially undeveloped ~ [] Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial ~r~ [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] Hilly Mountainous [] [] Other NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: 'V2 mile ~]Yes []No *1 miles []Yes []No '2 miles ~]Yes [~No *3 miles '[]Yes []No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number Of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknow, p, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed c~: FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] ~ ~-] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] Routine travel by residents [] At a residence At worksite [] L] Other [] Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (S16) 765q938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 14, 1988 Mr. Sidney Olmsted 1220 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 436 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposed Subdivision for Sidney and Robert Olmsted SCTM ~1000-114-7-14 Dear Mr. Olmsted: The following actions were taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, September 12, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the sketch map for this minor subdivision, survey dated and amended November 18, 1986, subject to 280-A access approval by the Planning Board. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the coordination process on this Unlisted action. The Board assumes lead agency status and in that capacity has made an initial determination of non-significance. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is granted by the Planning Board. {Four of the six maps must include Health Department Approval (Article 6).} If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. ~  /~u~y yours, _ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. &~" CHAIRMAN Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($16) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 14, 1988 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. your interest in assUming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Requested Action: Robert & Sidney Olmsted SCTM #1000-114-7-14 This proposed minor subdivision is on 3+ acres located at Mattituck. SEQRA Classification: Type I Unlisted Contact Person: Jill M. Thorp 516-765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EI$) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: assume lead agency status for this action. This agency wishes to This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [ ] Other. (See comments below,) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. cc: CHAIRMAN Board of Appeals ~,~BBoard of Trustees Uilding Department Southold Town Board ~_-Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services ,~NYSDEC- Stony Brook ~NYSDEC- Albany ZS.C. Dept. of Public Works _U.S. Army Corp of Engineers _N.Y.S. Dept. of Transportation * Maps are enclosed for your review _ Coordinating agencies APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHR~NGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN RnAD-STATE RFIAJ 25 c~OUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Upon application of ROBERT AND SIDNEY OLMSTED for Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Articl~ III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for approval of insufficient area of proposed Lots ~1, ~2 and #3, and insufficient width (frontage) of proposed Lot #2, each with an existing single-family dwelling, in this pending minor subdivision. Location of Property: Right-of-way off the east side of Westphalia Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-114-7-14. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on June 1988 in the Matter of the Application of ROBERT AND SIDNEY OLMSTED under Appeal No. 3725; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitte~ concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located in the "A" Residential and Agricultural Zoning District with frontage along the east side of Westphalia Road of 419.0 feet and total lot area of 133,000 sq. ft., or approximately three acres. 2. The subject premises is improved with three single-family dwellings as shown on the map amended April 14, 1987, prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. Page 2- Appeal No. 3725 Matter of SIDNEY AND ROBERT OLMSTED Decision Rendered July 14, 1988 3. By this application, appellants request approval of the insufficient: (a) lot area of proposed Lot #1 of 53,000 sq. ft., (b) lot area of 40,000 sq. ft. and lot width of 100 feet of proposed Lot ~2, (c) lot area of 40,000 sq. ft. of proposed Lot #3, all as shown on the "Minor Subdivision Map of Sidny W. Olmsted, Jr. and Robert W. Olmsted" prepared May 29, 1974 by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C., Licensed Land Surveyors. 4. Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule of the Zoning Code requires a minimum lot area of 80,000 sq. ft. and minimum lot width of 175 feet. The percentages of relief requested in relation to the area requirements is substantial, at 35% for Lot #1, 50% for each Lots #2 and ~3. 5. Article III, Section 100-31 excepted those lots having a lot area of less than 80,000 sq. ft. that were "held in single and separate ownership prior to November 1971, and there- after," or were approved by the Planning Board prior to May 20, 1983. The record shows that these parcels were not held in single and separate ownership, although the three single-family dwellings were in existence and occupied prior to the May 20, 1983 increase in lot area requirement. Pre-Certificate of Occupancy dated January 13, 1987 has been submitted for the record concerning these nonconformities. 6. In viewing the character of the immediate block area, the lots as proposed are consistent as to the general configuration and size of those presently established. 7. No prior appeals have been found of record concerning these premises. 8. It is noted that proposed Lots 92 and #3 will have access over a proposed right-of-way running within and along the northerly yard area, and is subject to New York Town Law, Section 280-a consideration and approval by the Planning Board since the right-of-way is located within the perimeter of the Minor Subdivision proposed herein. 9. In considering this appeal, the Board also finds and determines: (a) the practical difficulties claimed are sufficient to warrant a grant of this variance; (b) that the circumstances are unique to the property and are not shared by other properties in the neighborhood; (c) there will be no substantial change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to adjoining properties; (d) that there will not be any increase in dwelling density since each lot will contain a single-family dwelling and no additional dwelling(s) will be constructed; (e) the relief requested is substantial in relation to the current lot size requirement; (f) that the Page 3- Appeal No. 3725 Matter of SIDNEY AND ROBERT OLMSTED Decision Rendered July 14, 1988 difficulties cannot be obviated by some method feasible for appellants to pursue, other than a variance; (g) that the relief requested is the minimal necessary under the circumstances; (h) that in view of the manner in which the difficulties arose and in considering all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by the grant of this variance, as further noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the Variances requested under Appeal No. 3725 in the Matter of the Application of SIDNY AND ROBERT OLMSTED as applied and subject to New York Town L~w, Section 280-a access approval by the Planning Board, particularly to both Lots ~2 and 93. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki. (Member Doyen of Fishers Island was absent due to poor weather conditions.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN $~TY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 2, 1987 Mr. Sidney Olmsted 1220 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 436 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Subdivision for Sidney and Robert Olmsted Dear Mr. Olmsted: As per your request, and our conversation, enclosed is a list of proceedures for applications involving both the Planning Board and Board of Appeals, as well as, an application for a certificate of occupany from the Building Department. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, enc. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD ]Sy Diane M. Schultze, Secretary Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 27, 1987 Mr. Sidney Olmsted 1220 Westphalia Road, P.O. Mattituck,NY 11952 Box 436 Re: Subdivision for Sidney and Robert Olmsted located at Mattituck Dear Mr. Olmsted: The Planning Board is in receipt of your three-lot subdivision at Mattituck and this application has been reviewed. However, the Planning Board cannot take any action on this application until an area variance is received from the Board of Appeals since each lot proposed is less than the required two-acre zoning. Enclosed is an application for the Board of Appeals. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. cc: Board of Appeals Joan Olmstead * * * * * * N.Y.S. ~NSFER · STAMPS THIS INDENTURE, made the 7th day of .~une , nineteen hundred and eighty-five BETWEEN ' MARY W. MAC NISH, residing at Box 585, Mattituck, New York 11952 (no #) Westphalia Road asxx~xx~ Administr~tri~with will annexed of Ruth ~.W. Satterly Mattituck, New York partyofthefirstpart, and the last will and testament of , late of , deceased, gidny W. Olmstead, Jr. and Robert Olmstead, Box 436, Mattituck, New YOrk residing at p ty of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first pa~, b v rtue of the wer and ........ Y ~ authority given in and b ~id last ffwm ano testament, ano~~k an order of the Surrooa~'n County dated June n, 1970, and in consideration-;i-~n; rele~e unto tbe pa~y of tbe second rt. tbe heirs or u ....... ~ ---~ ....... g forever, ~ s ec~s .... ,~ ~s o~ me party o~ the s~ond ~rt ALL that ce.sin plot. p,ec~ or parcel of land. w,t~ the buildings =d improvements thereon er~. situate ~;~;;5~n~ :;t~ate. at "att~tuck, Town of ~outhold, County of ' ew xork, bounded and described as follows: :ion: .00 :k: )0 .000 BEGINNING at a point on the northeasterly line of Westphalia Road 810.0 feet southeasterly along said line from land of Wm. B. Reeve. Estate, and running thence N.27o 02' 50"E. 509.59·feet to Mattituck Creek; running thence along said Mattituck Creek first southeasterly and then southerly to said northeasterly line of Westphalia Road; running thence along said northeasterly line of Westphalia Road N. 70" 00' 00" W. 270 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. TO,GE.THER w. lth all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the firs.t part of, in and to any streets and roans anutting the above-described premises to the center lines thereof; TO?ETHER with the appurtenances, and also all the estate which the smd decedent had at the time of decedent s death in said premiSes, and also the estate ther. ein which, the party of the first part has or has power to convey or dispose of, wbether individ- ually, or by v~rtue of said will or otherwise; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party Of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first'part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anythlhg whereby the said premises have been incumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. ' . The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires· IN WITNF~$ WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. PRESENCE OF: MAR~W. MAC NISH,' as ~-~t' adm~nistratrix with the will annexed of the Last Will and Testament of Ruth L. W. Satterly On the 7th day of .June 19 85, before me personally came MARY.W. MAC NISH, as administ- ra~rlx wl~n will annexeo to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she executed the same. ' ' ~ta/y Public ~TATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS~ On the day of '" 19 . before me personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. ; that he is the of , the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that' the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. STATE OF N ORK, COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 19 , before me personally came to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS~ Oti the da)' of 19 , before me personally came ' the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly Sworn, did depose andsay that he resides at No. ; that he knows to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; that he, said' subScribing.wimessmwa~ present and saw ,execute the'~iia;.¢ and tha~ he, said witness, at the same time subscribed h i( name ~s witness thereto. .J 6'.~ .';... {?./~ ITLE NO. ARY W. MAC NISH, as ad~inistratrix with will TO annexed IDNY & ROBERT OLMSTEAD STANDARD FORM OF NEW YORK BOARD OF TITLE UNDERWRITERS Distributed by I~u~'ers ]]tle Insurance rporatton Homo Office ~ Richmond .Mrglnla ?50 THIRD AVENUE AT 48th STREET. NE! SECT,ON 114 BLOCK 7 LOT 14 COUNTY OR TOWN Suffolk RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF l wyers ]]Ile Insurance rporailon RETURN BY MAIL TO Schoer & $ileo, Esqs. 1100 Franklin Avenue Garden City, N.Y. 11530 Zip No. MAR ,3 i$87 Town of Southold Planing Board Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Sidny and Robert Olmsted 1220 Westphalia Rd. Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 February 25, 1987 Dear Sir or Madam; Inclosed is an application for a subdivision. While technically it is a subdivision, actually it is an effort to deride a parcel of land 3.3 acres with three (3) houses jointly owned by us.We plan no additions or alterations. Robert plans to own lot # 2 and Sidny plans to own lot # 3, lot # 1 remains as is. All three lots as seen on the enclosed survey, front on Mattituck Inlet. Each house has its own water supply and sewage disposal systems as shown on the survey. I thank you for your kind attention. dY°Urs t~hly APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold:"~gR_ ~ }' "~'~'~'~" The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (~ (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance ~vith Article 16 of the Town Laxv and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Towu Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under appl{catlon. (If the applicant {s not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The nameofthe subdivision istobe Sidny and/or Robert 01rested 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber .1..0.1..8.7 ................. Page ..3..5.0. ................ On 12-~0-86 Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... Liher ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ...R~.~.h...L.:...W.....S.a..t.t}..e.E .ly. ......... or as distributee 5. The area of the land is ..... .3...3. ......... acres. 6. Ali taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except ............ .......................... ?.?Y. 7?.-.-..-.7.-.7.".77'.?7'.'~V.".V?.'77'.-.7.-.'Y?.Ty.~7.~7 .................... 7. The land is encnmbered by .............................................................. mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page .................. in original amount of $ .............. unpaid amount $ ..................... held by ...................... address (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page ....................... in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... address (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber ~'.'~ .-.'~ 7. ~.~ .".~ 7' -P~,~' '~ 7'.-.~' ~'.~ 7'.~ 7'.'~ .- ~' Tn original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... ...................... address ......................................................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ........................ 9. The laud lies in the follo,ving zoning use districts .~.r¢.q~.~.~.,.. and Marine areas. I0. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, cept ................................................................................... 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land ~ (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is ............................................................. 13. Water mains will be laid by ...~..~ .................................................... and (a) (uo) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be iustalled by .... ~.g}.~[.~Og ......................... ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will he installed by ....i5...-¢....a. 0 .cl.. 9?...E. ¥ }.s. ~.~..rig ........................... and (a) (no) charge will he made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Itighxvay system, aunex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Toxvn of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the laud which are not located and showa on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which arc exteusious of streets on adjoiuing sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their coujunctions xvith the proposed streets. 20. Iu the course of these proceedings, the ai)plicant will offer proof of title as reqoired by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 2I. Suhmit a cop3, of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $...=.0.= ... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at .............. years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE ...~5..~b¥.U&ry ............. 19.~7. · 5.J. ¢.n y..and..Bo.her, l;..0 ~.r0 a.tm.c[ ........... (Name o~ A~plicant) fy ~ (Signature ani:l Title) ........ /'" 1300 Westphalia Rd. Mattituck (Address)BOx 436 New York 11952 Queens STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF ................................ , ss: , February ., 1987 On the ...... ~ .5 .......... day ot ................................... before me personally came ....... .S.i..al.n.y..0..1.m..s.t..e.d. .................. to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing' instrument, and acknowledged that . ........... he executed the same. Notary Public~/ STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ............................ ss: On the ................ day ............ of .............. , 19 ....... before me personally came .................... to me known, xvho being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No .................................................... ............................. that ........................... is the .......... the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that ............ knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed hy order of the board of directors of said corporation. and that ............ signed .............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Re: Minor Subdivision Sidny and Robert Olmsted 1000 114.00 07.00 014.000 The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. RO'2-~RT J. DOUCLA~ JOSEPH H. SAWlC~I Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD-STATE ROAD 25 SC UTHOLD, L.I., N,Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Upon application of ROBERT AND SIDNEY OLMSTED for Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Articl~ III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for approval of insufficient area of proposed Lots ~1, #2 and #3, and insufficient width (frontage) of proposed Lot 92, each with an existing single-family dwelling, in this pending minor subdivision. Location of Property: Right-of-way off the east side of Westphalia Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-114-7-14. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on June 9, 1988 in the Matter of the Application of ROBERT AND SIDNEY OLMSTED under Appeal No. 3725; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitte~ concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located in the "A" Residential and Agricultural Zoning District with frontage along the east side of Westphalia Road of 419.0 feet and total lot area of 133,000 sq. ft., or approximately three acres. 2. The subject premises is improved with three single-family dwellings as shown on the map amended April 14, 1987, prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. Page 2- Appeal No. 3725 Matter of SIDNEY AND ROBERT OLMSTED Decision Rendered July 14, 1988 3. By this application, appellants request approval of the insufficient: (a) lot area of proposed Lot #1 of 53,000 sq. ft., (b) lot area of 40,000 sq. ft. and lot width of 100 feet of proposed Lot 92, (c) lot area of 40,000 sq. ft. of proposed Lot 93, all as shown on the "Minor Subdivision Map of Sidny W. Olmsted, Jr. and Robert W. Olmsted" prepared May 29, 1974 by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C., Licensed Land Surveyors. 4. Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule of the Zoning Code requires a minimum lot area of 80,000 sq. ft. and minimum lot width of 175 feet. The percentages of relief requested in relation to the area requirements is substantial, at 35% for Lot #1, 50% for each Lots 92 and #3. 5. Article III, Section 100-31 excepted those lots having a lot area of less than 80,000 sq. ft. that were "held in single and separate ownership prior to November 1971, and there- after," or were approved by the Planning Board prior to May 20, 1983. The record shows that these parcels were not held in single and separate ownership, although the three single-family dwellings were in existence and occupied prior to the May 20, 1983 increase in lot area requirement. Pre-Certificate of Occupancy dated January 13, 1987 has been submitted for the record concerning these nonconformities. 6. In viewing the character of the immediate block area, the lots as proposed are consistent as to the general configuration and size of those presently established. 7. No prior appeals have been found of record concerning these premises. 8. It is noted that proposed Lots #2 and #3 will have access over a proposed right-of-way running within and along the northerly yard area, and is subject to New York Town Law, Section 280-a consideration and approval by the Planning Board since the right-of-way is located within the perimeter of the Minor Subdivision proposed herein. 9. In considering this appeal, the Board also finds and determines: (a) the practical difficulties claimed are sufficient to warrant a grant of this variance; (b) that the circumstances are unique to the property and are not shared by other properties in the neighborhood; (c) there will be no substantial change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to adjoining properties; (d) that there will not be any increase in dwelling density since each lot will contain a single-family dwelling and no additional dwelling(s) will be constructed; (e) the relief requested is substantial in relation to the current lot size requirement; (f) that the Page 3- Appeal No. 3725 Matter of SIDNEY AND ROBERT OLMSTED Decision Rendered July 14, 1988 difficulties cannot be obviated by some method feasible for appellants to pursue, other than a variance; (g) that the relief requested is the minimal necessary under the circumstances; (h) that in view of the manner in which the difficulties arose and in considering all the above factors, interests of justice will be served by the grant of this variance, as further noted below. the Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the Variances requested under Appeal No. 3725 in the Matter of the Application of SIDNY AND ROBERT OLMSTED as applied and subject to New York Town L~w, Section 280-a access approval by the Planning Board, particularly to both Lots #2 and ~3. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki. (Member Doyen of Fishers Island was absent due to poor weather conditions.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN standards in m~l be valid on is du;y filed N'T OF HEALTH SERV ~mentS n 3 tot~ re. ta at t~e t,me ot con )lql in the event said ~ County CI~ ~. riven for 2 .ce 55go°L- 40,800 ~_r. I _1 / h'", AT T ),TU O/. Cl jr) D SCALE ° 50'= I" g = /AOI,,IU/AEklT :~ - 5~,ri' -+ I + ¥ ?~0o ~4 LAND GEE~KIPOIZT , k~E\V YO~I~ Z..O° ;A ATT tTu tv... ~. 'T'. /',ND ~LJ I'D t:::14. i \'6 ~ L/i\ ~ I L: /A TTITUC TOWN u~-~"' SOU~I.4OLr),N,Y, -R DEC - 9 1988 ill o ! \ \ SU~VEYIED SL_D N_Y~. IV. __ OL~LS_.Z_~_ ~ . [2___. RI T ~,V. 0j IAqTF_ n 4,0~,aO0' fAAP ,'0~ L Alq D_ ¢jU~ZV~Yt~ D FOE. SID'NY t~. OL/A,STE_D,,, JE. BO, BEET X. OLIAST'E D · /AATTITUCV- TOWel OF sou'~obo N.Y. 12.-6 ti'fY Oj o SLDNY W. OL//xSTI;;;~, J2. AMD 120BE P__T \XL OLIAST'~ D SITU&TE IAATTITUCZ © VANTUYL, R" /At NOP_ ,SOl3 DtVt$ION- I'"')NY IV. Q ' I/,,STE F) SC&L[ A~ £,~PE,?,' .N GU~L~t N. 77' OZ' 50"I~. - 48,oo0 ' L 40 ooo 5 SCALE- o 50'= 1"