The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-112.-1-183. 4. 5. 6. 7. e 11. 12. MINOR SUBDIVISION 6 copies sketch plan received spot elevations ~ sent to Planning Board Meet with Planning Board Required changes sent in writing New submission received Approval of sketch plan Sent letter with resolution approving Application and fee If corporation, affidavit of ownership 6 copies of final map Covenants and restrictions ~ Description of property N~te on plat that sanitation ans Water facilities meet County Board of Health specifications Developer attend meeting (official~ submission) Public Hearing within 45 days) Advertised Affidavits of publication received Action by Planning Board (within 45 days) Sent to County Planning Commission Received County's recommendations Filed covenants and restrictions received Authorization and signing of map TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York 516 - 765-1801 · ~' " 18783 Southold, N. Y. 11971J~ / ~/~ '~> ~7 Dollars $ ~-~ ~ Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk C~sh [] Cheek Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I.. N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3523 Application 'Dated June 6, 1986 TO: Mr. Christopher Hehn Benro Survey Ltd. as Agent for STEVE KALAIJIAN 25-56 222nd Street Bayside, NY 11361 [Appellant(s)] At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on August 14, 1986 the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [ ~ Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule [ ] Request for Application of STEVE KALAIJIAN for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk and Parking Schedule, for approval of insufficient lot area of proposed Parcel No. 2 in this two-lot division/set off located on the north side of a private right-of-way extending off the north side of Bergen Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-112-01-18. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held ahd concluded on July 17, 1986 in the Matter of the Application of STEVE KALAIJIAN hnder Appeal No.~3523; and WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning and the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard, and their testimony was recorded; and WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and documenta- tion submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is a described parcel of land containing an acreage of 3.9486 and average lot width of 170 feet, and is more particularly described on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 112, Block 01, Lot 018. 2. The subject premises is unimproved and is at the present time subject to a pending conditional 280-a decision rendered by this Board concerning this private right-of-way under Appeal No. 3218 dated November 15, 1984 (J. Wanat). 3. By this application, appellant requests approval of the proposed insufficient area of Parcel #2 in this two-lot division/set-off of land of 62,070'sq. ft. Proposed Parcel #t would be 109,932.92 sq. ft. The depth of both proposed lots are 396.72 and 658.28 feet, respectively. ~CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) DATED: August 20, 1986. Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD · OF APPEALS Page 2 - Appeal No. 3523 Matter of STEVE KALAIJIAN Decision Rendered August 14, 1986 4. The topographical contours of the premises varies as shown on plat prepared by Bernhard H. Henn January 24, 1986 from 210 feet along the right-of-way to 255 and 260 feet within the building areas to the top of bluff. The area of unbu~ldable land below the bluff area has not been furnished, although when scaled on the January 24, 1986 plat, it appears to be an area of approximately 54,000 sq. ft. 5. It is the opinion of the board that the variance requested is 23,850± sq. ft., or 30% of a variance from the requirements, which is not the minimal which can be obtained under the circumstances. In considering this appeal, the board also finds and determines: (a) that the practical difficulties claimed are not sufficient to warrant a grant- ing of the relief, as requested; (b) the circumstances are not unique; (c) the relief requested is not the minimal necessary; (d) there is another method for appellant to pursue; (e) that in view of the manner in which the difficulty arose and in consideration of all the above factors, the interests of justice will best be served by denying the variance, without prejudice. Accordingly, on motion by Member Douglass, seconded by Member Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that the relief requested under Appeal No. 3523 in the Matter of the Application of STEVE KALAIJIAN BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AS APPLIED. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was duly adopted. lk Page 2 - Appeal No. 3523 Matter of STEVE KALAIJIAN Decision Rendered August 14, 1986 4. The topographical contours of the premises varies as shown on plat prepared by Bernhard H. Henn January 24, 1986 from 210 feet along the right-of-way to 255 and 260 feet within the building areas to the top of bluff. The area of unbuildable land below the bluff area has not been furnished, although when scaled on the January 24, 1986 plat, it appears to be an area of approximately 54,000 sq. ft. 5. It is the opinion of the board that the variance requested is 23,850± sq. ft., or 30% of a variance from the requirements, which is not the minimal which can be obtained under the circumstances. In considering this appeal, the board also finds and determines: (a) that the practical difficulties claimed are not sufficient to warrant a grant- ing of the relief, as requested; (b) the circumstances are not unique; (c) the relief requested is not the minimal necessary; (d) there is another method for appellant to pursue; (e) that in view of the manner in which the difficulty arose and in consideration of all the above factors, the interests of justice will best be served by denying the variance, without prejudice. Accordingly, on motion by Member Douglass, seconded by Member Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that the relief requested under Appeal No. 3523 in the Matter of the Application of STEVE KALAIJIAN BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AS APPLIED. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was duly adopted. lk Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11g71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3523 Application Dated 3une 6, 1986 TO: Mr. Christopher Hehn Benro Survey Ltd. as A§ent for STEVE KALAIJIAN 25-56 222nd Street Bayside, NY 11361 [Appellant(s)] At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on August 14, 1986 the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section IX] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule [ ] Request for Application of STEVE KALAIJIAN for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk and Parking Schedule, for approval of insufficient lot area of proposed Parcel No. 2 in this two-lot division/set off located on the north side of a private right-of-way extending off the north side of Bergen Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-112-01-18. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on July 17, 1986 in the Matter of the Application of STEVE KALAIJIAN under Appeal No.~3523; and WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning and the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard, and their testimony was recorded; and WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and documenta- tion submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is a described parcel of land containing an acreage of 3.9486 and average lot width of 170 feet, and is more particularly described on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 112, Block 01, Lot 018. 2~ The subject premises is unimproved and is at the present time subject pending conditional 280-a decision rendered by this Board concerning this pr~vate right-of-way under Appeal No. 3218 dated November 15, 1984 (J. Wanat). 3 By this application, appellant requests approval of the proposed £nsuff2cient area of Parcel #2 in this two-lot division/set-off of land of 62,070 sq. ft. Proposed Parcel #1 would be 109,932.92 sq. ft. The depth ol both proposed lots are 396.72 and 658.28 feet, respectively. !CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) 20, :086. CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN OF APPEALS ZONING BOARD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK pETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DATE: We are in receipt of your letter dated above referenced project. concerning the 1. This Department has no objection to your designation of lead agency status. 2. Insuffic£ent information is available for technical comments. 3. There is no record of an application to this Department. [] A more accurate project location is needed. (Suffolk County Tax Map No.) This Department has received an application and it is: [] Complete r~ Incomplete [] Other: It appears that the project can be served by: Sewage Disposal System [] [] [] Sewer System and Treatment Works Subsurface Sewage Disposal System(s) Other: WWM-067 (OVER) (516) 548-331~ o (cont'd) Water Supply System A Public Water Supply System Individual Water Supply System(s) Other: Comments: The Health Department's primary environmental concern pertaining to development is that the applicant comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code especially Articles V and VI, and relevant construction standards for water supply and sanitary sewage disposal. These considerations are to be reviewed completely at the time of application. Full considera- tion in placement of water supply wells and disposal systems is given to State and Town wetland requirements. The Health Depart- ment maintains jurisdiction over final location of disposal and well systems and the applicant should not undertake to construct any water supply or disposal system without Health Department approval. Other portions of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code also apply to commercial development such as Articles VII and XII. The Lead Agency is requested to forward a copy of this form to the applicant with its findings. Further comment may be provided upon completion of the application review. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Southold Town Board of Appeals NAIN ROAD- ~iTATE ROAD 25 SDIJTHDLD, L.I., N.Y. 11¢J?1 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 June 12, 1986 Mr. Christopher Henn, Vice Benro Survey Ltd. 661 Old Country Road Dix Hills, NY 11746 President Re: Appeal No. 3523 Steve Kalaijian (Variance) Dear Mr. Henri: This letter will acknowledge receipt of your recent appli- cation. The members of the Board of Appeals will be conducting field inspections and environmental reviews as may be required by State and local laws prior to scheduling your application for a public hearing. It is requested in the interim that you ~roceed with the [X ] Planning Board [X ] N.Y.S.D.E.C. in order that they may submit their written comments or recom- mendations as early as possible. Upon receipt of their input, your application will be scheduled for the next available hea~ ing date. If the above document(s) are submitted by early July, it is expected that the public hearing would be held about the middle part of August. A copy of the notice of hearings as published in the Long Island.Traveler-Watchman and the Suffolk Times will be sent to you as confirmation. Please feel.free to call at any time if you have any questions. Yours very truly, Enclosure v/~ cc: Planning Board GERARD P. GOEHRINGER Kowal ski D T, LD y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 25, 1986 Mr. Christopher Henn c/o Bernard Henn 121 Eddy Drive Dix Hills, NY 11746 RE: Steve Kalaijian Dear Mr. Henn: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday,June 23, 1986. 7 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the following comments to the Board of Appeals regarding the applicationof Steve Kalaijian located at Mattituck to set-off 62,070 square feet from 3.9486 acres: 1. The Planning Board can not endorse the insufficient area of Lot No. 2 and notes that although proposed Lot No. 1 is 109,932.92 square feet, much of the land is beach or underwater and would not be buildable. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc: Board of Appeals Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 5, 1986 Environmental Analysis Unit DEC, Building 40, Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 Gentlemen: Enclosed find a completed Short Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the map of the subdivision of Steve Kalaijian located at Mattituck, Tax Map No. 1000-112-1-18. This project is unlisted and an initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. We wish to coordinate this action to confirm our initial determination. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until June 19, 1986. We shall interpret lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and our agency will assume the status of lead agency. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. eric. cc: Department of Health Services Schultze, Secretary BERNHARD H. H£NN N.Y. State Licensed Land Surveyor 121 Eddy Dr. DIX HILL. S, NY 11746 (516) 271-1141 May 28, 1986 Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, NY 11971 Re: Tax Map Desig. #1000-112-01-018 Gentlemen~ We request that you consider the attached for a Set-Off. Very Iruly yours, Christopher Henn CH:tm att Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 REQUIRED DOCUMENTS SET-OFF 1. Survey map- 12 copies with contours, key map, and a scale of 1" = 100' indicated on the survey which lot is to be set-off with square footages and metes and bounds of each proposed lot. 2. Name of owner and adjoining owners 3. Covering letter requesting that the Board consider this a set-off 4. County tax map numbers 5. Filing fee of $50 6. Form letter regarding drainage, grading and road construction, see enclosed 7.Part I of Short Environmental Assessment Form, enclosed 8. Legal Description of Property, can be deed 9. Notation on existing restrictions applying to the property 10. Application, see enclosed PROCEDURE Submit above information and the Board schedules the set-off on the next available agenda. Field inspection is conducted At the next regular meeting the Board may either take action or make recommendations regarding the set-off Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) NO grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final)approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Laxv and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be ....... .~.~.~...~/..Z[....~.[...fi/...,:~:', .... .~. j;..~...l.'~. ............ 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) The land is held by the applicant und, e4- deeds recorded in Suffolk Count)' Clerk's office as follows: Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; Liber ........................ Page ...................... On Liber ........................ Page ...................... On as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ....................................... or as distributee 5. The area of the land is ~..-.~. k.~-9.. ~-] .... acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except .. -- ..... mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page .................. in original amount of $ .............. unpaid amount $ ..................... held by ...................... .............. address ................................................................. (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page ....................... in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... .............. address (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... ...................... address ......................................................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ........................ 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts ....~..-.. ~..;.q .~ .... .V. j~. :_?.t.!~?. ,.2.z.~. ! j..l?. ~-- 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) ~..~oes n~t~ lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is .............................................................. 13. Water mains will be laid by .d-.: .~q. . .,~.~. ?. ~..7~-..~ V~'-A.'T~-_~2 ......... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ..... ~'.~_.q:.x:./.._.~.....~5..~.~..; .~....~. ............. -. ~. ........ ..... ::.: ................. and( ) ('~) charge will be made for installing' said lines. - - 15. Gas mains will be installed by ..... /~/ 'g~ ' ....(..A/..¥:...c.'x~.~..'.3.' .t~(~/.~...,.k_.~).. :) and l~ (no) charge will be ma'd'e' };;'i~;(a'lii'~'~ 'ia'id mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highxvay system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Toxvn of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjnnctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $ .......... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at .............. years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE ............... ........ (Signature and Title) ........ .a.,(. .......... :.. &. ' - (Address) STATE OF' NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ....~..U..~..~..o..t-..ff~.. ................ ss: :'.~..~. 5.~..'~.x ~?...~....~=._......~....~...~. ..... to me knoxvn to be the individual described in and who $ executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . .~4..~. .... executed the sa .......... Notary Pupil/ ' JOAN M. PACE / ./ Notary Public, Stat_.e,~N~ew York ~,/ No. 52-~66-~, r= ~ Qualified in Suffolk Co~o,.~1 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF Commission Expires ~ - ,. ............................ ss: .,3 u g ~= On the ................ day ............ of .............. , 19 ...... , before me personally came ...................... to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No ..................................................... ................................. that .......................... is the .......... .................. Of the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that ............ knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. and that ............ signed .............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public PARTI NEW YORK ° I PROJECT I,D. STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIV S ON OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS St,~te Environmental Qu,qlty Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED AOTION$ Only Project Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) NUMBER 4, Is proposed action: ~lew [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration S. Describe project briefly: 6. Precise location (road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc. or provide map) 7. Amount of land ff t : ~ 8. WiU proposed action comply with existing zoning or other existing land use restrictionsf [] Yes J~ No If No, describe briefly 9. What is present land use in vicinity of project? //~Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial Describe: [] Agriculture [] Park/and/open space [] Other 10 Does action invo ye a permit/approval, or funding, now or ultimately, from any other governmenta agency (Federal, state or Iocal)f [] Yes [] No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals .... Does any aspect of the action have a currently valid permit or approvalf [] Yes ,~Ho If yes, iist agency name and permit/approval type 12. As result of proposed action will existin8 permit/approval require modification~ I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER PART II Environmental Assessment [To be completed by Agency) A. Does action exceed any Type I threshold in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.'~27 If yes. coordinate the review process and use the FULL/LONG FORM E^F ]'"-[Yes r~ No B. Will action receive coordinated review as provided for Unlisted Actions in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.77 If No, a negative declaration may be superceded by anothel involved action. C. Could action result in ANY adverse effects on, to, or arising from the following: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible] Cl. Existing air qua[it'/, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, movement of fish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly CS, Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Secondary, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C14.'67 Explain briefly. C7. A change in use of either quantity or type of energy? Explain briefly. PART I1! Determination of Significance (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL/LONG FORM EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide here, and on attachments as necessary, the reasons supportng this determination: DISTRIC¶ 1000 SECTION 112.00 BLOCK 01.00 LOT 018.000 C*OIGULT YOUB LAWYIA BE~OBE SIf, NIN4, T#IS INSTllUMINT · THIS INSTIUMENT SHOULD BE USID BY LAWYIIS ONL*V TH~INDF. NTU~ 30th ~¥o! December ,ahw, teeahuadmim~d eighty-five PATRICK CARRIG, residing at (No%) Richmond Road, New York 11971 and MARK S. McDONALD, residing at Avenue, Southold, New York 11971 Southold, (Noi) Soundview STEPHAN KALAIJIAN, residing at 35-56 222nd Street, Bayside, New York 11361 WITNF..SS--i~, th~ thc pant of the f=st ~, ~ coa~krad~ of .................. TEN and 00/100 ($10.00) ............... d~, ~wful ~ of ~ U~d Su~, ~id by the party of ~ ~ ~, ~ ~y ~ ~ ~ ~to t~ ~y of ~ ~d ~, ~e h~r~ or su~ ~ ~ of ~ ~ of ~ ~d ~ f~gr, ~ ~t ~ ~. pi~ or ~r~ of ~, ~ ~ bu~,~ ~d ~mv~ ~ e~t~. si~tc.. ty~~h~ a~ Ma~uck~ ~n ~he Town o~ Sou~ho~d~ Coun~ Suffolk and S~a~e of New York~ bounded and described as BEGINNING at a point on ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound where the same is intersected by the westerly side of land now or formerly of William Baxter; THENCE along said land now or formerly of William Baxter through a concrete monument near the top of the sound bank, South 22 degrees 31 minutes 10 seconds East 1055 feet to a concrete / monument and the northerly side of land now or formerly of Joseph Wterbicke; THENCE along said land now or formerly of Joseph Wierbick, South 84 degrees 10 minutes 30 seconds West 174.35 feet to a concrete monument and the easterly side of land now or formerly of Robert C. Kerr; THENCE along said land of Robert C. Kerr North 22 degrees 31 minutes 10 seconds West 1004.92 feet to said ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound; THENCE along said ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound South 67 degrees 28 minutes 50 seconds East 167.0 feet to the point of BEGINNING. TOGETHER with a right of way one rod in width over land of said Joseph Wierbieke and running along the easterly boundary of said land of Joseph Wierbicke from the southerly boundary of the premises herein described southerly to the northerly line of Bergen Avenue. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises conveyed to the grantor herein by Deed dated July 9, 1984 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on July 17, 1984 in Liber 9601, page 290. ~ with all r~ht. ti~ and interest, if any. of the ~ of the first rcods ahut~ng t~ above d~uibed premi~ to ~e ~ter lines TOG~ ~ the &ppm'tmances and ali the es~te and rights of the party of the first I~1 in and to TO HAV~ AND TO HOLD the premises be~in stunted unto the party of the 8ccond pa~'t, the be~rs m°cus~ and nmi~ns of the pa~ty of the sccond part for~ve~. whereby'.the mid prem~es have ~ incumbered 'th~m party of the first pail ha~ not done or su~cred any way whatever. "~_~_~t a~ a~orenid. AND the pm~y of the first part. in compliance with Section.13 of the Lien Law. covenants that the party of · e first ~ will receive the consider-d4iOa for this conveyance and w~ll hold the right to receive such consid- eration a~ a trust fuad to be applied first for the purpose of paying thc cost of the improvcmcot and will apply the some first to the payment of the co~t of the imProven~nt before using any part of the total of the same for ~The~"party'. ~ be coam-ued a~ ~f at read "parti~" whenever the sense of tl~ indenture so requh-es. F.~q~ WItEItF..OF, the pm'e/of the first ~ h~s duly executed this deed the d~y and year first wri~t~. PATRICK CARRIG ~- · ' The N~S, Environmental Qualityal~iL.,view Act requires sub- "~'.,<~: mission this form, and an envtrolntal review will be ','..- ~ made by this board before any action ~s taken, '".: . ..'~ .bil .~. ,~ - (a) In order to answer the question~ fn this ~hor~ EAr ~s is ~ed that ~h~ ·" :.. '-'er." . .'~' ~;'~[,-t~'~;~ ~. (b) 2~ any question baa been an~ered Yes the proJoc~ ' ' ' " .f .,cc=plated Envtrc~entaL Asaes=~un: ro~ ~= nece==ar/. · ..' (c) If all quasclono have been ans~ere~ No l: ~= likely t~t iht= project t~ ":' '<:': ':' ' '"~ .... ' ....' ... ','' ' -'- ~'' ?.," .' : '-' ' ' ..":'.~,.,. ";:~'. ','...':, .., '(d) ~virom=ental A~se~s~ent ...':'..31":.' "':: r. · , ':, < ~ .'r .... ~ ...... .~., W~1 project re~ In · large phy~ea~ change '"' . :...:... to the project s~te or PhTm~c~lZ7 alter more ......... . ........ · 2. W~I :here be a ~Jor chansa to any ~que or -" - .... ,., L.. ":" ' .', ' , ~e~ No ' ~. W~ projec: havo a poton:lall7 large ~ on '.',.. on adjacen~ sites? ., , , , , · · , · · · · ...: .... _ ~ 6, Will project affect any t~ea:ened or endangered plan: or a~LT~I 3pecles? , . . , , , · * * * * ~es ~ NO 7. W~I pro3ect reset in a major adverse effect on ~x 8. W~l project have ~ =~jor effect on visual c~ ' .... 9. ~ project adver=ely ~pact anF a~to or ~t~c~ · .~ env:ro~en~l area by a local e&oncTT · · · . ~ea ~ No .',' ~0. ~ project have a e~Jor e6~ec~ an ex~ot~& or - '.' 11. Will project result in ~Jor ~rafftc problems or cause a ma~or effect to existi~g transportation ' "~ 12. Will project reg~arly cause objectionable odor:, '" ance an a rest: of the project's operation? , Yes ~ No 13, Will project have any impact on public health or ' ' .... ' ' · · · , Ye~ ~ t;o iL, ~1~1 project gf~ct :he exsotln~ co~unlty by LAND NON OR .FOR ~LLY OF 0 i GSS. ~ ~ ~ '~ ~6 .72 ] RIGHT~OF-NAY~ ~ ONE/ROD( I~ NIDTH l I " ~ / ~ / / LAND NOW OR FORAMLLY OF RDBERT C. KEF ~ ' ~ KALAIdIAN PLAT MATTITUCK I ~Y C~TZFY THAT THZ8 PLAT Z8 NADE FROH AN ACTUAL BURVEY co.~. '..v. .-.~..~...~.~ ~.v~.~ ~*T~.~*~ , " -~- ' · ' -~ OWNER: STEVE KALAIdlAN ,~ 25-56 222nd STREET , BAYSIDE N.Y SCHOOL DISTRICT: ~ DATE OF ORIGINAL SUBMISSION: FIRE DISTRICT: ~ So DATE OF REVISED SUBMISSION: "'"~" ; BERNHARD H. HENN No. OF LOTS: o"-~" Top~ SECTZON ~ EDDY DRIVE 900 GALLON CAPACITY m DZX HILLS NEH YORK TYPICAL GESSPOOL DATE: 1/~4/B6 TAX HAP DESIGNATION t000-~2-0~-0~8 ! NILL,ZAM ~(TER 0 LAND ~/~ Z , ,, KALAZJZAN PLAT ~ " HATTITUCK Z H~Y CSTZFY l~l THIS PLAT Z8 NADE FRON AN ACTUAL SURVEY CO~ET~ BY,HE, B~D H, ~NN. N.Y.S. LZCENSE No. 49175 4. (reigned) ~ ~ , ~ ~a.~ ~ow~ SCHOOL DZSTRZCT: ~ DATE OF ORZGZNAL SUBMISSION: TOTAL ACREAOE: 5. q4 8~ ~ ,.-4.. ,=,b. NO. REVISION DATE _ ~E~T ~OLE ~A~A; , No, OF LOTS: : tE~ 'EDDY DR~VE 0,,_ ~,, Top~t~ SECTION f~ 2 ADDED WELL 7/~2t87 DOARSE SXND ' ~RAVEL ; 5 CHANGE LOT LINES 7/27/89 D~XHZLLS, NEW YORK TYPZCAL GESSP00L ,