The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-112.-1-16.1f MtN LEACHING POOL SECTION LEACHING TYPICAL PLOT PLAN TEST HOLE SLAB COVER,, NOTE WHeReAS applicant has submitted test well information showinq acceptable and potable water supply at the minlmum ~epth of 300 feet thezefore wellB pn ~&ch Individual lot shall b~ installed at a minimum o~ 300 feet total depth unless such individual lot is demonstrated to contain potable water at a FIE No. 12159 #ABS._I , D E C 18199 FILED SEPTIC TANK DETAIL 900 GAL. PUMP C YtlNDER & STRAINER TYPICAL WELL L BERGEN AVE. NO TES /2 TOTAL AREA OF MAP = I0.00 ACRES. 2) · - MONUMENT 3.) SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP IO00~II~LI-P/O LOT, 4.) ZONING D/STRICT IS R-80 RESIDEN77.z~L 5.) SCHOOL D/STRICT IS THE MATT/TUCK-CUTCHOGUE 6.) FIRE DISTRICT: MATT/TUCK ?.) LOTS ~ 3, 8 4 WILL BE GRANTED E~SEM~NTS FOR INGRESS 8 EGRESS OVER PART OF ~OT ~. STANDPIPE 8, S~REEN FOR FIRE PROTECTION AS PER o MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT BERGEN I [HOLLOW ( KEY MAP SCALE ,' I" = 600~ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS MADE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY COMPLETED B Y US ON 4/~/'~/ANO THAT CONCRETE MQIVUMEN?S HA VE BEEN BONDED AND WILL BE SET AS SHdO.L4~N~. / ~'~ ~--./. (~,~ W/LLIA~ J. BARR~T~ N. Y.& L.S. L/C. No. 0~4384 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLAN~ BOAR~ ¢P-~O~THOUZ~Y RESOLU,~"~'lC~V DA TJED. ~Y.. /~~~~~/~ CH~IRMA~ PL~NN/N~ BO~D MINOR SUBDIVISION OF BERGEN HOLL 0 W ! SlTUA TED IN MA TTITUCK, TO WN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK /00 0 /00 200 300 SC~_E: I"=100' BARRETT, BONACC/, HYMAN & VAN. WEELE, P. C. Cons u/ting Engin · ers an d Lan d Survsyors 175~ COMMERCE DRIVE HAUPPAUGE, N. Y. 11788 May 3, 1991 K-4699 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 Novmmber 4~ 1992 RE: Minor Subdivision Bergen Hollows SCTM9 1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on November 2, 1992: Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated May 3, 1992, with the following condition to be affixed to the map: No building permits shall be issued for the proposed lots until the dry hydrant is installed. (The dry hydrant has been allowed in lieu of a submersible well.) Such hydrant shall meet the specifications and water volume requirements of the Mattituck Fire District. In addition, such hydrant shall be accessible to the fire department at all times. Enclosed please find a copy of the map which was endorsed by the Chairman. The mylar maps, which were also endorsed by the Chairman, must be picked up at this office and filed in the office of the County Clerk. Any plat not so filed or recorded within sixty (60) days of the date of final approval, shall become null and void. Please contact this office if you have any further questions. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Encl. cc: Building Department Board of Assessors 1154 Pi158 DeclaraTion of Covenants and Restrictions THIS INDENTURE made :his 29th da; of September, 1992, by JOSEPH A. WANAT, residing at Bergen Avenue, Mattituck, New York, hereinafter called the Declarant. WHEREAS, the Declarant is the owner in fee simple of a certain parcel of !and situate at Matti:~ck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, desi;nated on the~Suffolk County Tax Map as District I000, Section I1], Block I, kot 16.1, containing approximately Lan acres, being t~e same premises acquired by the Oeclanant by deed da~ed on Decem)er 15, i989 and recorded in :he Suffolk County Clerk's office on April 17, I991 in Liber 10986 of Deeds at page 536 and referred t) herein as the "premises" and WHEREAS, the Declarant intends t) subdivide said premises for residential purposes and desires to subject said premises to certain conditions, covenants, and restr£ctions in order to preserve the "maximum open space, natural scenic beauty and natural yegetation and to Drevent the overcrowding and to conserve the ground water :' ~" ' ets or parcels, ~ ~NOW THEREFORE the and every resc~rces of the Town o¢ Southold, and WMEREAS, the Declarant has applied to the Planning Board of of Southold for approval of the subdivision and devetopmen% premises a Minor subdivision: to contain not more than premises the Town of the four (4) Declaran% do(s hereby declare that the aforesaid portion thereof is hereby ~eld and shell be ..... !!OLD TO~, q . 11547 159 conveyed ~ubjec% to the conditions, covenants and restrictions hereinafter set forth and that ever~' purchaser of said premises or any portion thereof, by the acceptance of a deed thereto, covenants and a~rees that ~he premises so purchased shall be held subject to the covenants, c~_nditiens and restrictions hereinafter set forth. 1. No lot or plot a~ shown and designated on the minor subdivision map approved by and filed with ~he Southold Town Pla~in~i Board shall be further subdivided in ierpetuity. 2. There shall be no future distur]ance, clearing, construction or filling in the conservation easement areas shown on Bergen ~ol!ows, except those n~cessary for planting, erosion control purposes, date{ and approved by the Planning Board. 3. All four driveways shall have ¢9e common access point as pro- vided by the access easement as shown on the Map of Bergen HollowS, dated and approved by the Southold To~n Plannin~ Board. 4. That all of the covenants, conditions and restrictions contained herein shall be construed as~re~l covenants running with the land and shall continue and remiain in full force and effect ~t all times as against the owner of %he premises or any portion thereof in perpetuity. Said covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be bindin~ upon, ihure to the tene~it of and be ~nforceable by the Declarant, their heirs, su¢cessor~ and assigns; any owner of any portion of the aforementioned pr~mises, their heirs, successors and assigns, and th~ Town of Southold, and its successors and ~ssiGns, and th( failure of any of the fcre~oinG to enforce any of such covenants, conditions and restrictions the map of fe~:cing and Southold Town 11547P 161 shall in ho event be so thereafter. deemed a waiver of the rights to do The Declarant grants ~he contin~ing right in perpetuity to the Town of Southold or any of its ,lesignated representatives to inspect any areas designated as open similar nomenclature so as to i~sure space, common areas or any continued compliances with the covenants, terms and provis.ons designated herein in regard to same and to insure that such covenants, terms and-prov~sions have not been violated. Declarant grants the continuing right in perpetuity to the Town of Southold or any of its desig%ated representatives to enforce the conditions and restrictions of the covenants as they relate to the open space, common area ~r nomenclature and to take any legal ac%ion it deems necessary to enforce the conditions and restricbions of the covenants. These rights of inspection and enforcement shall be binding u~on declarant, their heirs, executor legal representatives, distribu~ees, successors~ assigns and transferees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, year first above written. STATE OF NEW YORK). ss.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) this irdentlre has been executed the day and WANAT On the~ day of ~'~ , 1999-, before me personally came JOSEPH A. WANAT, tO me .~ncwn ~o be ~he individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF NEW YOR~K Cour~.+y of Suffolk I, EDWARD P. ROMAtNE, Clerko~heCounlyofSuflo]kandClerkot~eSupremeCou~toftheStale of New York in and for said Courtly Isai,d C~,urt o,~3~,ing a_~Co, urt of Record} DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared ~e annexed copy o~ ~and that kl is a just And true copy of such o.~gmal ~ u arid o! the whole lhereot " IN TESTIMONY ~EREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and aflixe..d the seal of said County and Court this I day of ~'~ Form NO. 104 PHONE:852--2000 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE Edwar~ P. Romaine, COUNTY CLERI( ~Town of Southold Assessor o~n of Southold Planning Board Chief Deputy County'Treasurer To Whom Tiffs May Concern: The Subdivision Map Of: Was Filed, Filed Number, A}.stract Township , Number, Southold Very truly yours, Map Department Form No. 49 County Clerk PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Lathara, Jr. Richard G Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765- 1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOFF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 September 15, 1992 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision Bergen Hollows SCTM9 1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on September 14, 1992: The final public hearing which was held at 7:30 P.M. was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Joseph A. Wanat is the owner of the property known and designated as SCTM#1000-112-1-16.1, located on the north side of Bergen Avenue in Mattituck; and WHEREAS, this Minor Subdivision, to be known as Bergen Hollows, is for 4 lots on 10 acres; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on June 4, 1991; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on September 14, 1992; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and be it therefore, Page 2 Bergen Hollows RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated May 13, 1991 that were received by the Planning Board office on August 27, 1992, subject to fulfillment of the following conditions. All conditions must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution. The submission of five (5) paper maps and two (2) mylar maps all containing a valid stamp of approval from the Suffolk County Department of'Health Services and all revised as follows: The driveway for Lot 4 must continue along the common driveway shown for Lots 2 and 3 in order to access the building envelope shown for Lot 4. The interior boundary of the conservation easement shown for Lot 4 is to be removed, and the entire area within the outside boundary is to be shown as a conservation easement. A notation must be placed on the map stating that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been recorded for the subdivision. The Liber and Page number must also be indicated. e The August 15, 1992 correspondence from the Mattituck Fire District must be clarified as to whether or not a firewell is required for this subdivision. If a. firewell is required, the location of such must be indicated on the final map. e The draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be revised and must be re-submitted for review by the Planning Board and the Town Attorney. Once it is approved, it must be recorded in the office of the County Clerk. The $6,000.00 park and playground fee ($2,000.00 for each lot that does not contain an existing residential structure) must be submitted. Page 3 Bergen Hollows Please contact this office if you have any further questions. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, J~. ~ Chairman THIS MINOR SUBDIVISION IS FOR ~ LOTS ON SCTM# 1000- II~- I- ~a,I ACRES LOCATED ON MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) Complete application received Application reviewed at work session Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised submission received Sketch plan approval -with conditions Lead Agency Coordination ' SEQRA determination Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewe'll location Notification to applicant to include on final Sent to County Planning Commission Receipt of County Report Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval . Final Public Hearing Approval'of subdivision -with conditions Endorsement of subdivision 14-16-2 (2/87J-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. · Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this E^F (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The proiect will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions - l~ame of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date J eAR',i. --P~OJFCT )NFORMAT~(~'q Prepared by Proiect Sponsor NOTICE: This document ~s designed to assist in de~erminmng w~ther the action proposed may have a significant etfe on the environment. ~le~e c~,]he entire form, Pans A through E. Answers to ~hese questions w t be cons den as Dart o~ {ha a~l~a~on for aD~[~ fl~T~b~cL~ further var ~ cation and pubhc reWew Provide any add tion information you ~lieve will be n~ to com~lela.~3,~ ...... · It ~s expected that Completion of the full EAF will ~ de~t on infor~a~On currently available and wiil not invok new studies, research ar investigation. If inlormation requirin~ such additional work ,s unavailable, so indicate and spoor each instance. )l~nr? E. ADDRE~ 3ZO Love Lane CITYmO Mattituck HAM~ OF OWNER (1) diff~ .. Joseph A. Agent..for W'anat (51~ 298-8420 Ma~tituck, New York 11952 8U$1N6SS TELEPHONE ( ) Be,szen Avenue Matti~uck minor subdivision of I0 acre parcel O~ ~0, oo0 ~,W'e~' ~e=~=9': into four lots NY t. 1952 Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable, A. Site Description Physical setting of Overall project, bo[h developed and undeveloped areas, 1. Present land use: [~Urban rqlndustriat ~Commercial [~Forest ~AgricuJture ~Other ~ 2. Total acreage of project area: 10 acres, APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushlahd (Non-~grlcultural) Forested Agricuhural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland [Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL) , Water Surface Area Unvesetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, building~ and other paved ~udaces Other (Indicate type)_ 1, a~ns {~Residentia[ (suburbanJ I~Rurai (non.lam~ PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres ~ _ acres acres 4 acres _ acres __ 2 acres 4 3. What ~s predominant soil type{s) on project site? . t o p.~.9 i 1. a. Sod drainage: ~Well drained 9F, % o~ ~te ~Moderately well drain~ ~ ~Poorly drained ~ - % of site % o~ si~e~) ~ , · u~h 4 of the 4. A~e there bedrock outcroppmngS on project site? ~Yes ~No ' ~ What is depth to bedrockl ~ fin 2 ~' ' '~m budding. :~hc-. or dis~ct, hstea~.., ~he State or ~he - Re,islets ot Historic I;lace~~ ~(c-~ ~o ~ ' ~s P~O~ect ~ub~tant~aiIy conc,~uous ;o a ~ite Ib~ed on :he R~ister o( National N~tural L~ndmarks?~Yes 9 ~ ~ite located over ~ prima~y, prmsipaJ, or sole source aquder? ~es ~o 10. Do hunting, fishing or ~heH fishing opportunities pre~endy exist in the prolect areat GYes ~No 1], Does p~oject site contain any ~pecies of pJant or ammal Ji[e that b identified as threatened or endangered? Identify e~ch species ~ ~ ~/~.~ 6~. ~s ~ ~2. Are there any unique or unusu~i hind forms on ~he pro;eot site? (i,e,, chffs, dunes, other geological formations) ~Yes ~No Describe ~~ 13 Is *.he proiect site presendy used by the commumt, y or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? I'qYes '~No If yes, explain 14 Does the present site incJude scenic views kno'^,r, to be impcrtant to the commumty~ I-lYes ~No 15. Streams witMn ar contiguous to project area: ~ a. Name oJ S~ream and n~me of Rige~ ~o which ~ ~ t~buta~, '~6. Lckes. ponds, wet/and areas within or contiguous to pro;oct area: ~ ,l~8~,~.c~,-~.~'-~ a. Name ~n~ ~ ~ ~/~ _. b. Size (in acres) 17. I~ the site Served by exisdn~ pubhc utiJises? ~Yes ~No ~C f a) If Yes. does sufficient ca~ac~ty exist ~o allow connection? ~Yes ~ ' . · '~ o} ~t Yes, will imptovement~ be necess~ry to allow connectmn? ~'es ~No 18 b the site located in an asrc ,~ural district.coral[ed pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25'AA, Section 303 and 304? GYes 19 Is th~ site Io~at~,~ n ..... of the ECL. ;nd 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes ~ ~ a Ur,t,~al E~,ronmentai Are~ des,~nated pursuan~ticle 20. Has t~e s~te ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazm'daus wastes? ~Yes ~No ~ ' B. Project Desoriplion 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. To(al contiguous acreage owned or Controlled by project SpOnsor ~ ~9 b. Pro~ect acreage to be developed: [0 . acres initially; t0 _ acres. c. P~o~ct acreage to ~emam undeveloped. ~ acres. ~ _ acres uhimatel~. d Length o~ project, in miles: n/a {1~ appropriate) e. It the project b an expansion, indicate percent of e~pans~on proposed ~ n /,t %; L Number of off-st~eet par~m~spaces existing_ ~ , proposed ~, pe~ ~oNn code ~. Maximum vehicular trip~ generated per hour__ ~ (upon completion of h. It ~esldenlial Number and lype o~ housin8 units; ~ -' One Family ~wo F~mdy ~lulhple Family Condominium U]timalely ~ i Dimens,ons (m feet} ot largest proposed structure ~ height; w~dth, J, [meat fee~ ~ bondage alon~ a pubhc thoroughfare projec~ w~l occupy b~ ..... ft code 3 ' 3. Will disturbed areas be roe!aimed? · a. If yes, for what intenduC purpose is the site beinE rcclaimed~ b. will topsoil be stockp.led for teclamaJioni ~Yes ~No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamat~on~ ~es t-INo 'yards. 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, §round covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (o',er 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? [3Yes I~1o months, (including demolition}. , year. (including demolition). year. (~ 0 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 2 4 . 7, If multi-phased: /V~ a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I month .. c. Approximate completion date ot final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? i-lyes 8. Will blasting occur during constrdction? ~Yes ~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? E3Yes i~No If yes, explain 12, Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [3Yes [~o a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be d~scharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes ElNa Type 14. Will surface area of ;n existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located~in a 100 year flood plain? E}Yes C]¥es ~No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~Yes (3No " ~ a. If yes, what is the amount per month ~,~' -- I,~.~ tons 'T'OX'/¥~. ?O/T- ~ ~ b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used/ ~Yes ~No c. If yes, give name Southold To~n ; lOcation Cutcho~ue d. WHI any wastes no~ go into a sewage di~Dosa~ system or ~nto a sanitary [andfllff ~Yes ~o e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life?. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? E3Yes C]Yes GtNo tons/month. years. ~No 19, Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? C]Yes [~No 20. Will prolect produce operating noise exceeding the local .ambient noise levels? F'lYes 21. Will proiect result in an increase in energy use? [~Yes []]No If yes , indicate type(s) domestic electricity 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumpulg capacity 5 __ gallons/minute per 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 1000 &aJlons/day. /Z-~ ~ ~PZ) 24. Does project involve Local. State or Federal funding? ~Yes f"qNo If Yes, explain ...... ~No SCDOHS ~00 ~-;2 D. Approvals t~equlr ed: City, Town, Village Board E]Yes UNo City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes ,~No City, Town. Zoning 8oard F-lYes UNo C. ity, County Health Depa~ment ~Yes ~No ~ther Local Agencies ~Yes Other Regional Agencies ~Yes ~o State Agencies ~Yes Federal Agencies ~Yes Type subdivision Submit Date C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision~' EYes If Yes, indicate decision required: I-Izoning amendment E]zoning variance rE]special use permit D'lsubdwision E)s~te plan (]]new/revision of master plan E~resource management plan E~other 2. What is the zoning cl~,ssification(s~of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning.; --~ 4 d~'e lling$ 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? __ ~_~ 5. What is the maximum potential development oi the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning,) 4 d~el 1 [n~.~ . 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans~ ~Yes 7. What are the Predomfnan( land us~s) on, zoning classfflca[ions within a ~ mile radius of proposed -- A-C · 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoinin~surroundmg land uses w~hin a % mi[e~ ~Yes 9. I~ lhe PlOposed action is (he subdivision o~ land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a_ What is the minimum lot size proposed~ -- 2 agFe 10. Wdl proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or wa~er districts~ ~Yes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any fire pro(ectionJ~ ~Yes ~No COmmunity provided services (recreation, education, poli¢ a. If yes, is existing cap,~i[y sufficien~ to h~ndle projected demand~ ~Yes 12. Will the proposed action resuk in the generation of traffic Significandy above present [evels~ ~Yes ~. If Yes, is the existing road nelwork adequate to handle the add~honal traffic~ ~Yes ~No D. Informational Details AHach any additional information as may be needed to clAti~y your project. H ~here are or may be any advers, impacts associaled with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures ~vhicb you propose [o mitigate avoid them. E. Verification ~F/C~ ~: ~~ ~o~/ ~S~N~ ~ ~ cerhfy tha~ [he information provided above ~s true [o the be~[ of my Eno~edgc. AppJicant/SpOnsor Name: Hp~ry F , R~nr . · . ~ .) ~eqt ~_ea~tlonislnt~eConsta Area, and youa~easi-- wllh [his assessmenL aze agency, complete the Coastal Assessment ,Corm be/ore p~OCeedlng Plrt 2--1 )JECT IMPACTS AND THEIR kGNITUDE · In c~pletinI ~ f~m t~ ~v~et s~ld ~ lu~ ~ t~ ~st~: Ha~ my ~es~nses a~ ~terminat~s ~V brle ~mpact must ~ ~aluat~ in PART 3 ~o dete~mi~ ~lnili~e. ~lilyi,I an impact in column 2 ~al- · T~ Eumples a~ov~ are to assist ~ mvi~et by ~inI ~s ol ~ac~ a~ w~re~er ~ssible ~ ~s~d o f~ a Potential Lar~ Im~ct ~. ~us ~u~nl ~alua~ ~ Pa~ 3. ~ ~ offer~ ~ ~a~e. ~ ~ ~t c~stitme an ~us~ I~t ~ ~ a~ ~s m a~ each · T~ ~um~r of examples ~r q~sti~ ~s ~t indicate ~ im~e o~ ,ch · In ~ntifyini impaq, consider ~nl te~, s~ term a~ cumlative eff~u. Imtm~m [Read ~refully] a. ~e~ each of ~ 19 questi~s in PART 2. Answer Y, if ~e will ~ a~ b. Ma~ answe~ s~ld ~ co~ider~ as ~ answen. c. If anteing Y, to a question t~n c~ck t~ appropriate ~z [column 1 ~ 2) to i~icate ~ ~tential size of im~ Jf impa~ ~ld ~uals ~ exc~s any example pro~. c~ c~umn 2. Ii impact will ~cur but ~1, ~ ~ ~an example, c~c~ column 1. d. If ~v~er has ~bt a~t size of ~ impact ~en consider ~ im~ct as ~t~lly larle a~ p~ e. If a ~tentially ,lar~ im~ct c~ck~ in column 2 can ~ mi~t~ ~ c~nl~s~ ~ ~ ~o~ to a small ~ IMPACT ON LAND .... W~l] ~e i~Ol~C~K! action r~ult in ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~o~ si~ ~NO ~ES ~ ~t ~ app~ to ~lumn 2 ~y ~st~ction ~ slo~s of 15% ~ Ireater, (15 f~t ri~ ~ 1~ f~t of len~hL ~ w~re t~ ~eneral slo~ in t~ proj~ area ~c~ C~ion on la~ ~re ~ depth to ~ water ~ble i$ I~s ~n 3 C~cfion of ~v~ pa~in~ area for 1.~ ~ more ~hicl~. C~ on la~ w~ ~r~k is ex~ or le~rally 3 f~t of ~istinl lr~ ~ace. C~ction that will contin~ for more ~an 1 year or invol~ more ~n one phase ~ sM~e. Excavation for mining put.scs that would ~emove mo~e than to~ of natural material (Lc., ~k or soil) ~r yea~. Cons~uction or ~pansion of a sanita~ landfill. Const~ction in a designat~ flyway. O~r impac~ 2. Will tJ~re be an effect t,. _.,V un,que or unusual land forms found on the site? [i.e.. cliffs, dun.es, leolo~ical fo('rnatio~s, etc.)ON• 1 SmaJI to Moderate O 0 0 [] [] [] [] 0 2 Potential Large Impe~t [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] Can Impact Be Mitigated By ENo OYes ON• OYes ONo ~Yes ~No I'-~Yes ENo []Yes i-]No []Yes ONo []Yes IMPACT O~ATER Will ~'oposed action affect any water Ix~ c~silnated as ~otect~t ~f A~s 1S. 24. ~ ~ ~ [~vk~ntal C~?~ Law. ~YES ~el~able area ~ ~e c~ms a ~ot.t~ water O~linl ~e ~4n 1~ ~c yards of material f~ c~n~l of ~K~ s~eam. C~st~t~ ~ i ~il~t~ freshwi~r ~ t~il 4. Will proposed action affect any r~n-protected existinI or new body of waterf .~'NO OYES Eaample~ t~t w~ld a~ly to colu~ 2 * A 10~ increase ~ ~crea~ ~ ~ sumacs ~rea of z~y ~y of water ~ m~e ~an a 10 ac~ ~rea~ or * Conduction of a ~y of water ~at exce~s ~0 acres of su~ace area. e ~r ~pacu: Will Proposed Action affe~l surface o~ Iroundwater qua. lity or quanUty/ ~1~0 OYES Ezample~ that wonld apply t~ colum~ ~ · P~ Action will require a discharle perrniL · Proposed Action requires u~e of a source of water that does not have approval to ~erve peopose,~L Loroject} action. · Proposed Acticm requires water supply from wells wit~ Ireater ~an 45 lallo~s per ml~te ~mp~I e3pacity. · Coc~.~Jc~G~ ~' ope~ticm ca,sinI a~y contamination of a water sul:q~ system. · Proposed ActJo~ will advenely affect Itoundwate~. · Liquid effluent Wql be coe~wyt~ off the site to facilitms wh:~h pres~ndy do not exist o~ haw inadequate capacity. · Prcqx~,d Action would use water in excess of 2~,000 laIlons per day. · Pro~osed Action will Iikel.. ~3~.~, siltation o~ other discharle into an e-lstinl body of wate~ ~; cr, e. ~.,~cnt that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural ccmditions. · Proposed Action will require the sto~ale of petroleum o~ chemical products Ireater than 1,100 lallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existin{ waste treatment and/or storale facilities. · Other impacts: Will propo~ sctic~ alte~ drainag*e flow or patlerns, or suHace water ~ffl ~0 ~YES E~pl~ ~at ~ app~ ~ column 2 II. let 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [] Potential Iml~ct O O 0 O O O O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 O $ Can Im~e~t Idltlg.te4 Project OYes OY~ O~o OYes ONo OYes ONo OYes ONO OYes ONo OYes O~o OYes OYes OYes OYe~ OYes OYes OYes OYes ONo OYes O~o OYes OYes · Proposed Act~on may cause substantial erosion. · Proposal Action is incompatible with existinI drainale patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a desilnated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON NR 7. Will p~opo-,~,d action affect air qualit~l /~NO OYES Eumples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any liven hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ~efuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed $ lbs. per hour or a heat source producinl more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase i~ the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endan, lered species? /~O OYES Ezample~ that would apply to column 2 ' · Redu,.-t~n of one or more species listed on the New York ot Federal list, usinI the site, over or near site or found on ~e site, · Removal of any port. ion of a critical or significant wildlife habi~L · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than ~vice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened o¢ non-endangered species? x~NO OYES Ezamples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish. shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal ot more than '10 acres of mature forest (over 1OO years of age) or ot~er locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land r esi' Ezarnples that would apply to column 2 · T~e proposed action would sever, cro~s or limit access ~o a~TiCUltural land 0ncludes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vinrfard, orchard, etc.) Moderate Impact 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 O 0 [] 0 [] 2 P0tenllal Large Iml~ct 0 0 O O [] 0 [] 0 O [] 0 0 [] [] 0 [] Gert Im~t .-'t ~e Mltlgate~ Project OYes - OYes OYes : m~NO []Yes _- ~No OYes ::::)No OYes : '-]No OYes -- ::}No OYes _- EgNo OYes :::)No OYes ~No OYes '~ Nc~ OYes OYes '-']Nc OYes []Nc OYes •Nc · Coflstructio~ activ,ty would excavate oc compact ~ sod I~ofile of alricultural land. · The proposed act:on w~ld irreversibly conve~ more than 10 ac~es ~ alficultu~al la~ ~. if ~at~ in an AlHcultutal Ois~icL more ~n 2.5 acres ~ alrkulturil la~. · The pro~x~,d act~o~ would di~upt o~ I~event instaflat~e d a~ral la~ manalement swtems (e.I, subsu~ace drain li~. ~tfet ditch. s~p c~oppin~ a create a ~ f~ ~ch me~ur~ (e.I. ~u~ a fa~ f~ld to drain ~ly due to increa~ m~ff) · Ot~r impacu: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resourcesl/~O I-lYES (1! necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum iff'Se(~tion $17~21. Appendix B.) E~=mple$ that would apply to column 2 · Propo~d land uses, or project componen~ obviously different from o~ in sharp contrast to current surroundinI land use patterns, whet~r' man-made or natural. · Proposed land u~es, or project comp<:x~nts v+sible't~ use~ of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or sign~icantly reduce their · enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project compon~nL~ that will result in the elimination o~ silnificant s<:~eening of scenic views r~nown to be import~nt to the area. · Oth~ impact3: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic o~ paleontological importance~' /~O OYES Example~ that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within 0~ substantially contiguous to any facility ~ site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed ]o<ated within the project site. · Prolx~ed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impact~:.. IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ,~O )The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunRy '~' A major reduction of an o~en space imp•ri, ant to the come, unity 1 Small to Moderate Impact O [] Potentl&l Llfge Imp&ct O O 0 O O [] [] [] [] $ Can Impact Be Mitigated By ProJ t Oha e OYes OYes ON• OYes ONe []Yes []No []Yes •No OYes []No []Yes ON• OYes []No OYes CNo []Yes []No OYes []No []Yes []1~o IMPACT ON TRAN~). RTATIO# 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation Esample~ that would a~ly to c~u~ 2 · Alteralmn of present patterns of ~e~nt of ~ople · Pro~sed Action w~ll result m mal~ ~affK problems. smalll to Moderate OYES Impact 0 0 0 IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will Froposed action affect the community's souc~ of fuel or enerlY supply;~ ~I~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use o! any form of eneraY in the municipality. · Proposed Action ,~ill require the creatiort or extension of an enerly tsansmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single o~ two family residences or to ser~e a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there ,be objecUonable odors, noise, or vibra at:q, s result of the Proposed ActJonl ,~NO OYES' Eumples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1.500 fe~t of a hospi~l, s'chool or other sensitive facility. · Odor's will occur routinely (more than ~ hour per day}. · Prol>os~ Ac~m will produce ¢hoer'~tin( Ioise e~ceedin~ t~'~:~l- ambient noise levels for noise 0~Lfide o~ structmes. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacL~: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed ^ctio~ affect public heal~ and safe~/~dO OYES Example~ that would apply to colunm 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of substances (i.e. oil. p~sticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any fon~n (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritatin& infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million o~ mo~e gallons of )iquified natural las ot other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavat~n or other disturbance within 2.000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or ~zard~ Potential Can L~ge I Mitigated ~y Impact [Ptolect 0 OYes O OYes 0 OYes 0 OYes ON 0 OYes nN OYes OYe~ OYe~ OYe~ O; OYe~ 0 OYes [] O OYe~ [ [] []Yes [] OYes L will p~o~sed action 4fleet the characte~ of the tzntmI E~ampl~ that w~ld l~ly lo column 2 The ~rm~nent ~pGl~lion of the c~. town or vdlaie in which lhe Prol~l ~s I~at~ is liEely ~ Ir~ by ~re t~n T~ mun~i~l ~dlet la capiMI ex~itures ~ ~rabnl ~ices will increa~ ~ ~ ~n 5~ ~r ~a~ as a ~eult ~ ~i~ ~oiect p~ ac~ will c~flkl with off~ially a~l~ plans o~ Pro~ ac~ will cau~ a chanle in ~ ~nsi~ of la~ u~. Pro~ Acl~ will replace ~ eliminate existinl ~acilities. or areas o~ historic im~nance Io ~ communi~. Development will create a demand for additional c~muni~ se~ices le.I. ~h~ls. ~lice a~ fire, etc.) Pro~s~ Act~n will ~t an implant prec~enl f~ future project. Pro~s~ Acl~n will create ~ eliminate employ~nL Other impact: 1 2 3 Small fo Potential :Can Impact Moderate Large MItlgafed By Impac! Impact !Project C~ang~ 0 ~ CYes ~ ~o ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~No ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~o ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~o 19 Is there, or is there likely to be. public controv~?~y related to potential adverse enviro~m~nb~l impact, si' ,,,~NO DYES' If Any Action In Part 2 Ii'Identified aa a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS le~x)m, ibil]ty of Lead AaerK-y Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impacl(s) is cortsideced to be potentially Larle. even il the impact(s) may be mltilated. Instructiom Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitilated o~ reduced to a srnall to moderate impact by project change(s~ 3 Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude ',hat this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider. · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and loa}s · Whether known objections to the proiect relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) PAR'~-PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determimng whether the action proposed may have a significant effe on the environment. Please cc~np~R!e the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consider, as ~art Of ibC al~ll~d~iOn fo~ ~ ~c~urther verification and pubhc review Provide any addition information you ~lieve will ~ n~ t° com~jet~ It ~s expected that completion of the full ~AF will ~ de~t on inf0f~aflOn currently available and will not invok new studies, research or mvestigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and sgeci each instance. n~.g~ Av~n~. Mattituck. New York E. Raynor, Jr..- Ageot..f~r W~nat ] (51~ 298-8420 Henry ADORER 32,0 .Love Lane Cil'Ytpo Mattituck NAMI~ OF OWNER (If Jose~ A. Wanat .... ~[~en Avenue Ma[tiLuck D~SCR~ION O~ ACTION z,e coos jBUSINESS TELEPHONE ,, NYj 1 1.9 ~2 minor subdivision of 10 acre parcel into four lots Plcase Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A, if not applicable t A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: I~Urban rllndustrial ~Forest F~Agricuiture 2. Total acreage of project atea: [.0 APPROXIMATE ACRI~ACE Meadow or Brushlahd (Non-agriculturall Forested [~Commercial CIResidential [suburban] C]Other __ ~ . .... acres. ~Rural (non-farr~ PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres ..acres acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 9 Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) ...... Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces ]. Other (Indicate type}. La, wns ....... acres 4 acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres 2 acres acres 4 acres 3. What ~s predominant soll type(s) on project site~ . I;o_~soil, san~ a. Sod drainage: ~Well drained __o~ % of site D1Moderately well drained _ % of site ~Poorly drained % of site b If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of ~he Land Clads,fica[ion System~ ~ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370), 4. Are there bedrock outcroppmg~ on p~oject site~ ~Yes a. What is depth to bedrock~ _ n /n [in feet) 2 {ggl 2 budding, she, or dis(riot, the State or the National Registers of Historic Pla,es? E]Yes []No . [s pro!eot substantiaily coat ~uous to a site lit;ted on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? l-lyes ~.~No 2. What i~; t~e depth of the wate~ table? ~. 50(in ~eet) 9 [~ site located over a primary, principal, or sole source ~0 OD hunting, fishing or shell fishing] opporhmities presently exist in the proiect area~ ~Yes ~No tl. Doe~ project site contai~ any species of plant o~ animal life that is identihed as threatened or endan~ered~ Identify each species ~2 Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project s[te~ (l.e., chffs, dunes, other ~eoto~ical formations) ~Yes ~No Describe 13 Is the 14 project site presentiy used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation areal ~Yes [~No If yes, explain Does the present site include scenic views known to be impcrtant to the community? F-IYes [~No Streams within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name ol; Stream and name of Rive[ to which ~: is ;ributa~, 15. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name ,~/a , b. Size (In acres) 17 Ps the site served by existin~ public utilitiesf ~Yes I~No a) tf Yes, does sufficient capacKy exis~ to allow connection~ ~Yes ~No b} If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connect.on~ ~es ~No 18 ts the site located in an agricultura district cerbfied pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, ~e .[ion 303 arid ~047 ~Yes 19 ts the site located of the ECL ~nd 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes ~o 20. Has the sl~e ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes¢ ~Yes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a Total contiguous ~cre~8¢ owned or Controlled by project sponsor 10 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: ].0 __ acres inihall¥; acres ultimately. c. Pto~ct acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d Length of project, in mile~: .~. / a__ (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate pelcent of expansion proposed ~ %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existinA _ ; proposed _ pe g, Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ___ 3 (upon completion of projecU~ h. If residential Number and type of housing un,ts: One Family Two Family Multiple Famdy Initially 4 ..... Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of lart~cst proposed structure height; ...... j. linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy town code Condominium w~dth; ~ length, per ft. code 3 town 2. How much natural material (i,e, rock, ~1~% etc.)will be~[~es removed from the s~te~ 0 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~No ~N/A . a. If yes, for what intenduc purpose is the site being reclaimed? 1 ~ ~.n ~ b. will topsoil be stockpded for reclamation~ ~Yes c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~es ~No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground cove~) will be removed from site? 0 acres. S. Will any mature forest (over 1~ years old) or other Ioc~ily-impo~nt vegetation be removed by this project? ~Yes 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 2~ _ months, (including demolition). 7, If multi-phase: a. Total number of phases anticipated ., (number). b. Anticipat~ date of commencement phase 1 month ~ c. Approximate completion date of final phase month ..... d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~Yes 8. Will blasting ~cur during construction~ ~Yes ~No 0 g. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~0 ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any pfojec~ or facilities? ~Yes ~No If yes, explain .- 12. Is surface liquid waste dis~sal involved? ~Yes a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount ....... b. Name of water body into which effluent will be d~scharged , , -, 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes ~No TTpe ~m~ ~ 14. Will surJace area of ~n existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ~Yes ~NO Explain , ' 15. Is project of any portion of project located in a 1~ year flood plaint ~Yes ~o 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the amoun~ per month, * ~ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~Yes ~No c. If yes, give name SouCh~]~ ~o~n .... ; location d. will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system of into a sanitary landfill? ~Yes e. If Yes, explain .... tons/cubic yar~$. .. year, (including demolition). .... year, 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yeS, what is the anticipated site life? .. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? E3Yes C~Yes ~No tons/month. years. g~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? r-!yes [~No 20, Will prolect produce operating noise exceeding the local ,ambient noise levels? IqYes t~'lNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? RYes r'iNo If yes , indicate type(s) dom~.pti~ elec,,t, ricLty ....... 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity S gallons/minute pet SCD0~tS 23. Total anticipated water usage per day _ 1000 gallons/day. 24. Does proiect involve Local, State or Federal funding? [~Yes i~No If Yes, explain ........ Approvals Required: Type City, Town, Village Board CiYes ~No City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes I-lNg ,, ~_ubdivis ion City, Town'Zoning Board F'lyes ~No City, County Health Depa~ment ~Yes F-lNg ~:~r~r & ~o-a~.r ._ 'Other Local Agencies I-lyes Other Regional Agencies r'lYes State Agencies [:]Yes ["JNo Federal Agencies i-lYes EaNo ..... Submittal Date · C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed ~ction involve a planning or zoning decision? ~:~Yes If Yes. indicate decision required! [~zoning amendment f-lzoning variance I-lspecia~ use permit ~subdivision ~lsite plan i'-Inew/revlslon of master plan Fqresource management plan [~other _ 2. What is the zoning cl~.ssification(s]of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4 dwellings 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? A-C .... 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 4, ,dwellings ........... . C 6, Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted ~oca~ land use plans,) [~Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s] and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action~ A-C 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses w~thin a ¼ mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 2 acre 10. Will proposed action reciuire any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? t-lYes [~i 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, poli. fire protection? dYes [-1No a. If yes, is existing cap~:city sufficient to handle proiected demand? :~]Yes [:]No 12, Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present Ievels? l-lyes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic[ C'lyes ClNo O. Informational Details Attach any additional informahon as may be needed to clarify your project, if there are or may be any adve impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate avoid them E. Verification I certify that the information provided above ,s t~ue to the best of my knowledge. Annlicant/Sno,~sor Name , .on,,~, ~' R~v,,r_ Jr~ A~ent Date ,3/21/91 . . ...... C Signature ?~)'//~ T,tle . . If the action is in rife Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form bet'ore proceecll wilh this assessment. SERVIa;TAR, 320 Love Lane Ma%%ituck, NY March 21, 1991 11952 VIA FAX ~o~thold Town Planning Main Road 5outhold, NY 11971 Board RE: Minor subdivS~ion Dear Sirs: oo~vptl A, Wanat at l~at~.ituck As requastad, please find A~se~$ment Form for the above HER:ml Eric, enclosed the Long Environmental referenced. Sincerely, SERVI ITAR,? To: Southold Town Planning Board From: !{enrv P~ynor Re: Wanafi 1000-112-1-16.1 'Enclosed herewith are the required documentation for submission of t ' .his nroposed minor subdivision. Please review, meeting. and set ~or the earliest oossible Should you have any ~uestions, nleas., call me at Thank you. APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Plannin§ Board 0f the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentafive) (final) app?oval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 o{ the Town Law and the Rutes and Regulations of the $outhold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the oxvner of record of the la~%d under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2, The name oithe subdivision is to be . minor subdivision of Joseph Waaat '.' 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber ...,10986 Page 5.}6, On 12/19/89 . Libor Page On ' Page On ' Liber ' Libor Page On ' Libor Page On ' as devised under tile Last Will and Testament of ....................................... or as distributee .................... , .................................................... $. The area of the land is ...I. 0...Q .......... acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on tile land at thc date hereof have been paid except ............ 7. The land is encumbered by , ............................................................. mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page .................. in original amount of $ .............. unpaid amount $ ............ ' ......... held by ...................... .............. address ............................................................... (b) Mortgage recorded in Libor ......... Page ...................... in original amonnt of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ................... ... .............. address .......................................................... TO 29821~? ~.ffi ' - (c) Mortgage recorded in tiber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ........ ;': ............ held by ...................... ...................... address ......................................................... 8. There are no other eneumlmmees or liens against the land except ........................ 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts .... ~LC ............................... 10. NO part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pood water or otherwise, ex- 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. Thc land (l~ (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, ii within a District, is .............................................................. 13. Water mains xvill be laid by . .......................................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and ~tandards will bc installed by , L. I, L. C. 0, ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20, 21, Gas mains willbe installed by ............................................................ and (a) ,(no) charge will be made for installing said mains. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Ilighway system, annex Schedule ,,ri.,, hereto, to show same. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by. the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold {Iighway system, allllex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. There are no cxistin~ bnildiugs or structures on thc land which are ilot located and shown on the plat. Where the plat shows l)rOpo$cd street~ which are exten..ion$ .f streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said ~'xi~tln~ inapt at tlmlr conjunctions with the proposed streets. In the course of these proceedings, thc apl)licaut will ./for prooi of title as required by $cc. 335 of thc Real Property I.aw. .qabmit a copy of proposed deed for lots -41owing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schcdtllc "D". 22. '~he appllcanl estimates that tile cost of gradiug and required public improvements will be $ .......... as itemized in Schedule "E' hereto annexed and requests that the maturity et the performanca Bond be fixed az ............ '~[ years. The pedormance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company ~nless oZherwise shown on Schedule ........... 19q l, S~ ................ t, ~ I0 ., '" DAT~ &~ ....... (Name of (Address) .. On lhe .... J. ~. .......... day of... . .... ~x~¢ut~d th~ ioregolng instrument, and acknowledged thai .. ~ ..... e~CUled the same. NOTARY pU~I~ Stats ~ ~ Y~ . · .................... No. 6788330, Suffolk C~n~ T~ ~piT~ ~Y 31, 19~ .............. SS: sTATE OF NEW yORK, coUNTY OF ....... . ....... ot ............... 19 ....... by/ore me personally came On the ................ day ............ to me known, who being by me duly sworn did dc- at No resides ........ and say thai ............ is the .......... pose that .......................... · . ...... Of ....................... ~ ......... know; · , .... ~.t.,.oi~e~ iuS, ti-nmcntl ~l~at ............ tile c¢~rporation described in anti which ~XCcttte/l the it~ .~ ,. . the st'a; o[ said corporatkm; that tile seal ai£1xcd by order oi thc board el ilirectors of said ¢orpnr~,ucw name thereto by llke order. a~,l thal ............ signed .............. Notary Public Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: minor Sub4ivision Of Joseph Gentlemen= The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-men:ioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) NO new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, Henzy E. Raynor, Agent for Joseph Wanat Jr. IRIlo E~vilQIt~nt81 ~ly Review SHORT ~ViRONMENTAL A~SESSMENT FORM F~' UN~G~ED AGTIOH~ O~ly PART i--PROJECT INFQR~TION ~Q ~ ~omelet~ by Appl~nt or Project .... mi~or ~ubdivision ~oseph WanaC _ ~ n/W/c Bergen Avenue,Mat[ituck, Ne~ York f. is/,~OPO~D ACT~O~ minor sub, aviS[on o~t0 acres into ~ parcels STATE gO£~ AXV A~PtCT O~ THE A~T:ON HAVe, A GUI~TLY YAUD I~1' OR ApPflOVAk. -- DY., ~to ........ '-- - ........ . ,.:,. .... :_.-~: - ://.._ - , :.: ........ ~ ...... Il the aetion il in thc Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete OVER 1 12:15 5o~thold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-191~8 please complete, sign and return to the office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer- to any of the following questions is ye~, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or sub-mit other appropriate evidence, and arasSes on this parcel? yes 1. Are there any wetl~ L~ .~+~and orasses defined (Attached is a list or sa= - by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership '.~.~/ Yes abutting this pareel? 3. Are there any building permits pending on yes this parCel? 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town , State, county, etC.) Yes 5. Is there ,any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different yes project on this parcel? is oroperty the subject of any prior 6. .Was.~_ ~ the planning Board? yes applicatZon ~ this property have a valid certificat~ No 7. Does :v ,,eS olease submit.a Copy of same yes of occupancy, ~ s~-~ ~ tatementS are true and will ~e relied ' ...... the above ? - , '-- ~his aoolicat~on. , I certlZY ~== .-- =card in consl~¢rin~ - r= / /n / on by t~e planning ~. ~ / / Attachment to questionnaire for/the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUp? OF SUFFOLK, ss: On the // day of~~r~, ' 193 before me personally came ~%~ ~ ~z~ to me known %o be the individual Sescribed i~ and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ~execut~ the $~me~ No6a~ry Public TOWN CLER~ 4 4 9 0 8 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York Phone 516-765-1801 Southokl. New York 11971 ~~ ~ ~ ~ Oate~ REC~I~DOF~ ~~' Judith T. Te~, Town Clerk~ TOWN or SOeTnOnV N°. 3 9 2 2 3 Suffolk County, New York 516 - 765-1801 ~ $oulhold, N. Y. 1197~_.~a.~ 19 ~/ RECEIVED OF~~ ' J~dith T. Terry, Town Clerk ~sh ~ Check ~ ~~~~~~ TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk Counly, New York 516- 765-1801 N.0 3 9 0 8 S ~ Southold, N. Y. 11971 ~-- o~0 199/ PLANr',Ili~ RO~D DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS THIS INDENTURE made this ~ay of September, 1992, by ~' resid~ing a~ Bercen Avenue, Mattituck, Ne~ York, JOSEPH WANAT~ hereinafter called the Declarart. WHEREAS, the Declar~n= is the ~wner in fee simple of a certain parcel of land situate at Matt.tuck, Town of Southol~, COUnty of Suffolk, State of New York, de;ignated on the Suffolk County Tax Map As District 1000, Section approximately 10 acres, being by deed da~ed on County Clerk's office on .12, Block 1, Lot 16.1 containing ~h~ same premises acquired by the Declaran~ and recorded in the Suffolk in Liber of Deeds at page and refer:~d to herein as the ,'premises" and WHEREAS, the Declarant intend~ to subdivide said premises for residential purpose~ and desizes to subject said premises tO certain conditions, covenants, and re~trictions in order to preserve the maximum open space, natural s(enic beaut~ and natural vegetation and to prevent the overcrowding a~d to conserve the ground %;ater resources # Of the Town of Southold, and WHEREAS, the Declarant has apl,lied to the Planning Board qf the town of Southold for approval of the subdivision and de,~elopment of the premises as a Minor subdi;ision, to contain not more than four (4) lots or ~aroels, NOW THEREFORE, the Declarant ~oes hereby declare that the aforesaid premises and every protion th-~reof is hereby held and shall be conveyed subje~= to the condi~ions, covenants and restrictions . i HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, ~ND THAT EVERY PUI~CHASER OF sAID PREMISES OR ANY PORTION THEREOF, BY TME ACCEPTANCE OF A DEED THERETO~ COVENANTS AND ~GREES THAT THE PREMISES SO PURCHASED SHALL BE HELD SUBJECT I O THE COVENANTS, CONDITIO~S, AND RE~TRICTIONS HEREINAFTE~ SET FORTH. 1. NO LOT OR P~OT AS ~H(.WN AND DESIGNATED ON THE tdINOR SUBDIVISION MAP APP~OVEI BY AND FILED wITH THE SOL~HO~D TOWN PLANNIN~ BOARD SHALL BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED. ~. THERE SHALL B~ NO FUTURE DISTURBANCE, CLEARING, CONSTRUCTION, OR ~I~LING IN THE CONSERVATION EASEM~NT AREAS SHOWN ON THE MA~ OF B~fGEN HOLLOWS, EXCEPT THOSE NECESSARY FOR PLANTiNg, FENCING A~D EROSION CONTROL PURPOSES~ DATED , APPROVED BY T~E SOuTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FOUR DRIVEWAYS S ~ALL HAVE ONE COMMON ACCESS POINT AS PROVIDED BY THE ACCESS EASEMENT AS S~OWN ON THE MAP OF BERGEN HOLLOWS, DATES AND APP~[VED BY THE SDuTHOLD TOWN P~ANNING BOARD. 4. THAT ALL FO THE ~OVENANTB, CON~IT~ONS~ AND R~ST~ICT!ONS CONTAINED HEREIN SHALL ~ CONSTRUED AS REAL COVENANTS RUNNING W1TH TME LAND A~D S~AL[ CONTINUE AND REMAIN IN ~U~-L FORCE AND ~FFECT AT AL~ T~MEB AS AGAINST THE OWNER OF THE PREMISES OR ANY PORTION TME~EOF IN ~ERPETUITY. SAID COVENANTS , CONDITIONS AND RESTRICT ONS SHALL BE ~IN~ING UPON, INURE ~ TH~ BENEFIT OF AND BE ~ NFORCEABLE BY TH~ DECLARANt, THEIR HEISS, SUCCESSORS AND A~SIGNS; ANY OWN~R O~ ANY PORTION OF THE AFO~MENTIGNE~ PRE~ISEB~ THEIR HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS~ AND TH~ TOWN ~ S~UTHOLD, AND ITS ~UCC~SSORS AND ASSIGNS, AND ThE FAICUR~i OF ANY OF THE FO~GOING~ TO ENFORCE ANY OF SUCH CDVENANTS, CONdITiONS AND RESTRICTIONS SHALL IN NO ~V~NT BE D~SMED A W~IVE~ OF THE RIGHTS TO DO SO THErEAfTER. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr,. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 30, 1992 SCOWl' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Henry E. Raynor, Jr. 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision Bergen Hollows SCTMgl000-112-1-16.1 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Southold Town Planning Board approved and endorsed the above mentioned minor subdivision on November 2, 1992. The Planning Board did not require a performance bond for this subdivision. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, ~2~remtatnOrlowski, Jr. X"~r; TO BARREI'r, BONACC[, HYUAN & VANdlEEL£, P.C. Engineers Surveyors Plel~lrs 175A Commerce Drive HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788 Tel: (516) 435-1111 FAX: (516) 435-1022 WE ARE SENDING YOU [~Attached [] Under separate cover via J-~:-P ~ I ~ [] Shop drawings [] Prints [] Plans [] Samples [] Copy of letter [] Change order [] the following items: [] Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: FFor approval r your use [] As requested [] For review and comment [] Approved as submitted [] Approved as noted [] Returned for corrections [] REMARKS [] Resubmit [] Submit [] Return copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints [] FOR BIDS DUE 19__. [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM~: COMMENTS: SUBMISSION WITHOU~T COVER LETTER ~IL _ - I6. ~ Phone 298-g833 October 30, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold, N. Y. 11971 Re: Proposed Hinor Subdivision Joseph Wanat SCTH #1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Hr. Orlowski: The Board of Fire Commissioners has agreed that Hr. Wanat may install a "dry hydrant" in lieu of the submersible well mentioned in our letters of August 15, 1992 and April 11, 1991. This dry hydrant shall be located at the east side of the irriga- tion pond, approximately 1000' north of the subdivision. This dry hydrant shall meet the specifications and water volume requirements of the Mattituck Fire District. Mr. Wanat must also guarantee that it will be accessible to the the fire department at all times. cc: Henry Raynor Very truly yours, G. Thomas ~oodhull Chairman Board of Fire Commissioners · PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'I'F L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 October 5; 1992 Eenry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision Bergen Hollows SCTM~ 1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Mr. Rayn0r: On April 11, 1991, in response to the Planning Board's inquiry as to whether or not a firewell was needed for the above mentioned four lot subdivision, the Planning Board received a recommendation from the Mattituck Fire District for a firewell to be located at the southeast corner of proposed lot ~4. On April 15, 1991, the Planning Board notified you that such firewell would be required. It is understood that you then discussed the firewell situation with the Board of Fire Commissioners, resulting in the Commissioners' letter of August 15, 1992, which stated that it would be satisfactory to them if the firewell were moved 100' to the east of the original site. It is the Planning Board's opinion that the August 15, 1992 letter does not eliminate the need for a firewell for the four lot subdivision. Rather, it allows your client to locate the well 100' to the east of the original location (on his neighbor's property) if such is agreeable to the adjoining property owner. In light of the above, in addition to the conditions of final approval, prior to any endorsement of the Bergen Hollows minor subdivision, it will be required that one of the following take place: a. the firewell be installed; b. a bond for the firewell installation be submitted to the Town; c. a condition be placed on the map that prior to the issuance of any building permits for dwelling units for the proposed lots that the firewell be installed. Bergen Hollows October 5, 1992 Page 2 Please indicate, in writing, how you intend to proceed. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr./" Chairman cc: Mattituck Fire District SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM~: COMMENTS: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER Iooo - //x-- I-. £/c I~. / DECLARATIO~r OF COVENANTS AND RE~;TRICTIONS This INDENTURE made this d~y of JOSEPH A, NANAT, residing at ~.rgen hereinafter called the DECLARA~T. WHEREAS, the D~cI~ra~t ~s t~e ~wner parcel of land situate at Matt~tuck, September~ 1992, by Aventle, Mattituck, New York, in fee slmp].e of a certain Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of Ne~ York, de:ignated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as Distr~ct 1000~ Section ~12, Block approximately !0 acres, DECLARANT by deed dated County Clerk's office on in Liber of Deeds at page and referred to hereinafter as ~he "premises" and WHEREAS, the Declarant intend~ to subdivide said premises for residential purposes anO desi~s to subject said premises to certain condit~ons~ covenants ~nd restrictions in order to pre~ serve the maximum open space, ~atural scenic beauty and natural vegetation and to prevent the (vercrowdin~ and to conserve the ground water resources of the ~own of Southold, and WHEREAS, the Declarant has applied to the Planning Board of the To~¢n of Southold for approval (f the subdivision and development of the pre~ises as a Minor sub(ivision, to contain not more than four (4) lots or parcels, NOW THEREFORE, the Declarant (oes hereby declare ~hat the afore- said premises and every portio: thereof is hereby held and shall be conveyed subject to the con(itions, Covenants and restrictions !. Lot 16.1 containing being ~he same premises acquired by the and recorded in the Suffolk hereinafter set ferth, ~ =ne th~ every purchaser of said a..~ = ~+o~, ~ke~c., by ~he ~cc~pt~nce of a de~d thereto, covenants R~d agrees ~h~t the premises so purchased shall be held ~ =~b~_~ to hhe Cpvenants, conditions~ ~nd restrictions here~n~f~.e~ set ~ ~rth. 1. NO lot or plot as shoun e)n] desit~nated on the minor sub- division map approved b7 aud f[led >;~n the Town of Southold Planning Board shall be fu.rthe~ subdivided. 2. There shall b~ no future distrubance, clearing, or filling in the conmervation easement areas shown Berge~ Hollows, %xcept ~'~''=.xoSe'a = ..... ~. n~.un=m~ / for p!antin~, and erosion control purposes, ~ated , approved by the .~u~ho~.d Town ~lannin~ Board. 3. Ail four drive,Jays ~ha~l h~ve one common acces~ point provided by the access easemen~ as shown on the map of Bergen Ho!lows~ dated , ~nd approved by the Southeld Town Planning Board. 4. That all of the covenants, conditions and restrictions contained herein shall be construed as real covenants with the land and shall continue and remain in full force and effect at all times as against the o%~ner of the premises or any portion tn_r~of in pgrpetuity. Said covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be be enforceable by the assigns; any o~¢ner of construction on the map of fencing and their heirs, successors and as~igs, and the Town of Southold and its successors arid ~$signs, and the failure of any of the foregoing to enforce any of such covenants, conditions and restrictions sh~ll in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. bi~din.~ lpon, inure to the benefit of and Declarant, their heirs~ successors and any port[on of the aformenetioned premises, The declarant grants the conti :uing right in perpetuitl, to the To~n of $o,]tho!d or any of its designated representatives ~o inspect any ~reas d .... ~nat~. as open space, common areas or any similar noma~calure so as o ~n~ure continued compliance with the covenant~, ter~i~ and , rov,=~ons designated herein in re~ard to same and to lnst~r~ ~t S~¢~ covenants, terms and provisions have not been viola ed. Declarant ~rants the conti~uin~ right in prepetuity to the Town of Southe!~ or any of its designated to enforce the ~ond_uluns and 'estrictions of the cevensnts as they relate to fha ,~pe.. spa.~e common area or no~penclatu~e and to take any te.~al action i. deems necessary to enforce the conditions and ~ '~ ~ .~ of ~.est~.ct ~n~ the covenants. These rlqhts of irlspection and enforcementan=' ~ 1 be binding upon~ ~]e~]arant, their heirs, executors, legal 'epresentatives, distributees, successors, assigns and transf ~rees. Jo;eph A. Wanat STATE OF NEW YORE) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On this day of , .992, before me personally came Joseph A. Wanat, to me to be known as the individual described herein and who executed the foregoing instrument and ackDowledged that he executed same. Notary Public COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ss: STATE OF NEW YORK LEGALS NOTICE Notice of Public He.aring NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIV- EN that i~r~mm~ lo S~ton 276 of the Tmvq~ a public hear- ins wili I~ ~j the Southold .~Wn ~ ~l~umn'~r~ lk~ard[at the Tow n ~ ~:lig~"Main Road 'SOIlt?0~. 4t~t~ ~.k jn said T6/~n .oh th~ :'~'~'~4~h" day of September 1992, on the queStion of the 7'.30 P.M, ~F~,~proval for the ~inor'~V/~in for ~n H~f~ ,nt' ~ ,Mattliuck,~' Tow. o, onnty York. S~ ~ Map Thep thcnort~ ~red on or ~iy//t ~Wanat; on the sC~IF~ ~.j~venue, and ~,~ s~er~y of dimm,<~ ~] ~atm; o. t~e ~;~ ~ ~ow o~ r~r~ ~ ~d Ente~a~. 7:]~ P.M. ~ ~p~ for the set off f~ ~ Rou~ at Southold; C~ntY of Suffolk folk ~ ~ ~um~ The pm~'is ~md on the no~ ~ ~d 'now or formerly of ~thwohh on the ~t ~ ~ n~ or f~m~ly of ~I ~n Chlm~dn'~e~ on thc ~t~t ~li~ ~:~ P~r~maa~ ap- ~ r~'~ ~r su~i~sion fo~ ~ ;~ons chog~e, ~ ~e. T~n of ~uthold, C~ty of Suffolk ~d the Sm~ b[N~ York. Suf- folk ~un~ ~ Map Number 1~1~1-2~ the no~ formerly of Eugenia B. ~pust~, ~ land n~ or fo~ly of Ai~ ~tnski, ~ ~d n~ ~ folly of Ma~t M~aF~, ~ land n~ ~-~ly of M~affe~, ~ I~d ~ or for~ of ~1 M~affr~, and ~ ~ n~ or formerly of Agnes Kuh~ and L.~ Hor- ton; on the southeast by Main Road N.Y.S. Rt. 25; on the southwest by land now or ~foime~ly of H. Haur~; ~n!lhe south by land now o~fo~ly of Barbara M. Haurus and land now or form~;'ofStth~ey ~ and ~dward~.~iaff; southwest by land,.now) m' formerly of Anna Barlsk. by. land nowor formerly of Dickey; on ~he northwest by land now or formerly of Sophie Kaloski and by land now or formerly of Eugenia B. Kapu~tka. 7:45 P.M Preliminary ap- proval for themaj0t Subdivtdon for Southold Villas, Seciion 'I~o at S~Ut ,l~d-,.,4n ~..Ibwn of Sout~ld; Cbunty'of !~affolk and the Stat~ of New York. Suf- folk County Tax Map Number 1000-70-I-P/O, 6. The property is bordered on the north'by land now or formerly of Russell Mann & loan Mann; on the east by map of Southold Villas Suffolk County File No. 9237; on the south by land now or,formerly of Flower Hill Building Corp.; on the-west by la~d, now or formerlyofAnn Dlller Hemblo and Thomas E. Hemblo. Any' person detdring to be heard Oh the above matter !hould appear'at the time and place above s ~RD IX-9/3/92(26) Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been .published in said Long Island Traveler-Watchman once each week for .................... / ...... weeks · successively, commencing on the ....... ,~. ~ ......... Sworn to be'o'e me this ............ clay ....... ~-~ ..... ~ 9 .~..~. Notary Public BARB:~R/~ A. SCHNEIDER NOTAR'/PU!~LIC, St?lc of ~'~ew York No. 43g~.~46 HENRY E. RAYNOR 320 LOVE LANE MATTITUCK, N.Y 11952 AUG . 27, 1992 TO: SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD RE: BERGEN HOLLOWS 1000-112-1-P/0 16.1 ENCLOSED HEREWITH ARE FINAL COPIES OF THE ABOVE CAPTIONED SOBDIVISION PER REQUEST OF THE BOARD. THE C AND RS REQUESTED WILL BE FORTHCOMING. SHOULD ANY OTHER ITEMS BE NECESSARY FOR FINAL APPROVAL, PLEASE CONTACT ME AT 298-8420 THANK YOU. MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 666, 1000 PIKE STREET MA~rlTUCK, LONG iSLAND, N,Y. 11952 Phone 298-8833 August 15, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Southold Town Planning Board Southold, NY 11971 Re: Joseph Wanat Subdivision Dear Bennett, It has been Mattituck Fire District that the proposed subdivision would be satisfactorily moved the site indicated on map returned to you agreed by the Board of Fire Commissioners of the firewell for the above 100' + or - to the East of Cordially, in April of 1991. )ist. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-[938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 1'1971 Fax (516) 765-1823 August 1.8, 1992 Henry E. Raynor, Jr. 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision Bergen Hollows SCTM91000-112-1-16.1 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 17, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, September 14, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. for a final public hearing on the maps dated May 3, 1991. The maps must be revised in accordance with the Planning Board's August 13th letter. All. required information must be received prior to September 4, 1992 or the hearing will be rescheduled. Very truly yours, ennett Or-owsKi, or. Chairman HENRY E. RAYNOR 320 L£VE LANE MATTITUCB, N.Y 11952 AUG. 14, 1992 TOG SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BEARD RE: BERGEN HOLLOWS 1000-112-1-i6.1 DEAR MR ORLOWSKI: PURSUANT TO YOUR LETTER OF A~] 13, 1992: ITEM %. AS THE PRESENT MaPS ARE AT A ~CALE OF 1"~50, AND YOUR 1. ETTER REUQEST MAPS AT SCALE 1"=1~0'; lam ~EQUESTING THE FOLLOWING. WE WILL SUPPLY THE PLANNING B3ARD WITH 12 SETS OF 1"=5~' WITH THE OTHER REQUESTED INFORMATI]N IN YOUR LETTER. WE WILL SUPPLY THE PLANNING B]ARD WITH 12 SETS OF MAPS AT THIS MAP W~LL BE APPROXIMATEL! ONE QUARTE~ OF THE SIZE THAT EXISTS. THE INFORMATION OU~ ENGINEERS TELL US WILL BE ILLEGIBLE BECAUSE OF THE REDUCTION. IN ORDER TO FULLY COMPLY WITH YOUR REQUEST THE APPROXimATELY $1200. TO HAVE ~EMADE THIS MAP. THIS IS A MINOR SUBDIVISIO! WHICH WILL ONLY WOULD ASK THE ABOVE BE CONSiDEReD. COST IS ADD THREE LOTS THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONS!DERAT[ON. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARR1S Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Augush 13, 1992 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision Bergen Hollows SCTM# 1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board has reviewed the maps that were submitted on July 31, 1992. Please note the following: The scale of the map is 1" equals 50'. The Planning Board requires all maps to be at a scale of 1" equals 100'. Therefore, the map as presented is not acceptable. In a letter dated April 15, 1991, the Planning Board advised you that a firewell was required for the subdivision. The location of the firewell was not shown on the final map. The building envelope indicated for Lot 94 shows the typical building setbacks, which allows developement to occur within the conservation easement. The building envelope should be revised so that the entire envelope is located outside the conservation easement. Due to the ambiguity of the conservation easement on Lot 91, a building envelope should be indicated for this lot also. Again, the envelope should be located outside the conservation easement. Bergen Hollows August 13, 1992 Page 2 One common access point must be shown for all four driveways. Easements must be granted over the adjacent lot(s), where applicable, to allow for such common access. This must be noted in the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions in addition to being shown on the map. Be There shall be no future disturbance, clearing, construction, or filling in the conservation easement areas shown on the map. The terms for the conservation easement must be contained in the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must contain a restriction that there is to be no further subdivision of the lots in perpetuity. The final hearing will be scheduled for September 14, 1992. Revised maps and a draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions in accordance with the above, must be received by September 4th or the hearing will be rescheduled. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~ Chairman 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 July 31, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Wanat minor subdivision at Mattituck Bergen Hollow Dear Sirs; Please find enclosed mylar and paper maps of the above referenced which have been approved and stamped by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. ~S~ncerely~ ~ Henry ~. Ra~Lhor, Jr. HER:m1 Encs. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765- [ 938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O, Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 June 9, 1992 Henry R~ynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision Bergen Hollows SCTM9 1000-112-3-1 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 8, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from April 1, 1992 to October 1, 1992. Please note that this is the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, · · Chairman 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY May 19, 1992 11952 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Subdivision of Joseph Wanat at Mattituck 1000-112-1-p/o16 Dear Sirs: We hereby request an extension of time to obtain approvals from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Sincerely, HenryVE. . HER:mi CC: J. Wanat PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765q823 December 10, 1991 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision Bergen Hollows SCTM# 1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 10, 1991: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from October 1, 1991 to April 1, 1992. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. .// ~J Chairman 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 November 18, 1991 Southold Town Planning Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Board RE: Minor subdivision of Joseph Wanat 1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Sirs: We hereby request an extension on the sketch approval granted to the above referenced on March 7, 1991 so that we can continue pursuing Suffolk County Department of Health Service approvals. HER:ml PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 6, 1991 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold~ New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision Bergen Hollows SCTM~1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Tuesday, June 4, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative DeclaratiOn for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Ortowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance June 4, 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Bergen Hollows SCTM#: 1000-112-1-16.1 Location: North side of Bergen Avenue in Mattituck SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Description of Action: Residential subdivision of 10 4 lots. Yes ( ) No (X) acre parcel into Page 2 Bergen Hollows SEQR Negative Declaration Con't. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it has determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. Because there has been correspondence received from the Department of Health Services commenting that that agency has no objection to the Planning Board's designation as lead agency. The agency also recommended that the Planning Board protect the kettle depression in the vicinity of the proposed development. The Planning Board has required building envelopes and conservation easements for all applicable lots in order to protect the kettle depressions. Because there has been correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation commenting that the Department of Environmental Conservation does not have jurisdiction unless the subdivision crosses a regulated area. Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 CC: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission David Morrell, DEC Commissioner Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ' ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS May 14, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Review of EAF Bergen Hollows SCTM# 1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Benny: ' As per the your request of April 23, 199l we have completed a p/'eliminarv review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: Reviexv Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. o Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The site includes 10.00 acres of land, proposed to be subdivided into four (4) lots, all in excess of 80,000 square feet. The parcel was at one time part of a larger parcel which extends north to Long Island Sound, and includes several perched ponds and wetlands areas. The subject 10 acre land division will not affect these resources, and the surface water features are in excess of 900 feet away. The overall 10 acre site is presently occupied by a home, with associated barn structures, and a horse paddock. The home will remain on Lot 1, and the barns will remain on Lot 3. New structures are proposed to be constructed on Lots 2, 3 and 4, following approval of the land division. There are significant depressions, located on Lot 1, and between Lots 3 and 4. These features can be and should be avoided in locatin$ homes on these lots. The depressions are grassed, and are not characterist,c of natural geologic features, as the vegetation and grades have been modified. The balance of the site consists of meadow and grassed areas. There are large maple tress lining the driveway on Lot 1, and there is an area of maple trees and oroamental trees west of the eastern depression, on Lot 2 and 3. The site is located in Gronndwater Management Zone IV (outside of the water budget area), and will conform to SCDHS density requirements. The site is in a 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Page 1 of 2 Bergen Ilollmvs Long EAF Revie,w general area which has been impacted by nitrate and aldicarb contamination according to the North Fork Water Supply Plan. SCDHS Article 4 approval for a water source with possible treatment measures is necessary. The proposed intensi~ of land use is low (0.5 dwelling units per acre), and is consistent with area use and zoning. The configuration of lots provides suitable means of access, and adequate area for construction of dwellings without significantly impacting site resources. The Plarming Board may wish to consider aligning access for all four (4) lots with the bend in Bergen Avenue, in order to avoid a driveway closely offset from this turn which may cause traffic conflicts as the road becomes more heavily utilized in the future. This can be accomplished using a driveway easement for Lot 4, over Lots 2 and 3. The Part I and II Long EAF failed to reveal any significant impacts to site - environmental resources, which would warrant the preparation of a Draft EIS. Accordingly, the Board may wish to consider adopnng a Negative Declaration, based upon the reasons outlined herein. I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to complete review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon regluest. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any quesnons. Very t[uly y, ours, Cbarles J./~/o o this enc: Part I/II LEAF CRAMER, VOORHI~ &ASSOCIATES ENVlRONMENTAI~.%.A__N_EX PLA~ING CONSULTANTS ~ VIII~ ~,\ Page 2 of 2 FAX COVER SHEET TO: _.. ~,.~ ~ / CONPANY: ..... ~x ,UMbeR: 'TLm~-/gvl 3 ~U~,E. o, ,A~S (~.C~U~,. COW, S,~ET): // FROM: MESSAGE: IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL US AT (5!6) 924-3230. 1 ~31 M,Jdl¢ COuI'!Vy RoAd. R~d.3~:. NY 1!991 TEL {5~6)924 3230/ FAX ~516j924-3557 KEY MAP_ $'CALE : 1" = 600~ ~?_-,c'F[eY CERTIFY T~T ?HIS pL~T W~3 MADE F~L~'~'I ~N AC, ZEN 80NDEO ~NO WILL 8E sET ~S SHOW~ 2ENNETH ~ ~ ~'" ' ~ ~V~TE~ SUPPLY ANO SEWAGE ~ISPOS~L F~C/L/T/ES ~0,~ ~? 7G IN THIS ~EVEL op~ENT CO.MPL Y ~VITH THE S ?~N~~o'S E~/~EMENTS OE ?HE sUFFOLK COUNTY ~EP~'~N;7 ~'~ ~TEVEN ~ HYk1AN ~y.~...p.~i~~ ~'4/S IS 70 CErTIfY ?H~T THIS SUB, IV/SION PLAN ~S 8EEN ~pp?OVEO · ~i~ PL~NN/N~ 80~RO OF sOUTHOLO ~Y ~ESOLU~'ON oATE~. DA TE : CH~/RMA~ iPL ~N~//N~ ~-~'.~ LOT LINES O~ ~U~o/V/S/ON M~P3 ~ F/LEO. ~N~O? :.'I?HOU? PERM/SS/ON FROM 7HE pLANNING 80~RD, AND L , S s~N ON THE 3~D/V/S/ON , IINGR SUBDIVI$ O MA;= OF GEN $1TUA TED IN -~ltfA TTITUCK, TOWN OF $OUTHO£D SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK 50 O 50 I00 1,50 $C/~LE : I" = 50' Barrett, Lmnzlsera, Bscl{man & Hyman Consulf/ng Englneer~ and Lond Surveyors t~5 Church S freer I001 Middle Counf~y Malverne. N, Y. May $, 1991 Ridge. tX/. Y'. (516) 924-~30 w~L L CL A Y, OR PL, 25' DWeLl. ~" DIA, ?VC B $ TRA ? ~F'~CA L ~'EST HOL~ BORING McDONALD G~O$C/ENC~ MARCH/, 13~1 I.~' 17' ~ TEST HOLE FINISHED 4" REINF CONC. SLAB ~ f'L OW FRO~ SEPTt¢ TANK I/$" P£R FT. MIN. RTCN 3'-0" pR~cCAST CONC, LE~CHING POOL ~' MfN, ~ WA T~mR . ~' MtN INTO SAND $ 6~AVEL LEA CHINO POOL SECTION W~'L L 4" A¢/N DIA. PIPE CAST /RON, CLA~, BITUMINOUS FIBER, C'~MENT ~SBE$ rO$ OR PLA: PROP, 25' DWELL L£ACHIN~ ¢0' · I0' MIN. ~00 6AL. S~PTIC TANK TYPICAL PLOT PLAN TEST HOLE BORING BY McDON,4LD GEOSCI~NC~ MARCH I, 1991 F/N/SHED ORA DE ~ ~" D/A, lgROP Pi&m, -- 4" D/A, PVC CASING PUMP CYLINDER 8 S TRAINER TYPIC r_c~sr ¢ONC. tCHING POOL 8'-0' REINF, CONC, CovER SL,~B COVER, ORIENT OPENINGS OVER TEES ~OUTLET p~R ~' CON~ ~ GROUNOWA7'~R $' M/N, INTO SAND 8 GPUIV~L 'POOL SECTIO V. 4" MIN ~IA. PIPE' cASr lROll CLAY, OR PL~SnC ~ 10' MIA 900 GAL, L PLOT PLAN. SEPTIC TANK DE,TAIL_ - gOO,OAL_. FINISHED C~STING 8 ,~" DROP 4" D/~, PI,/¢ 3/4 H.P. :2 STAGE M/,~, 83 GAL, STORAGE rANK GROUNDWA T-eR PUMP CYLINDER 8 S TRAINER .9' M/~ TYPICAL WELL. 'L,. ,~MY~TION ou$~ 94° e$~ $.F'. /'EST 114, 656 /.) TOTAL AREA OF' MAP :. I0.00 AC/:?~S. 2.) B - MO/VUtVtE'NT ,.~.) SUF"FOI-K COU/VTY TAX/V/AP/O00-11,~.-I-P~'O LOT 4.) ZOf¥TNG D/STRICT IS R-80 RE~StDENT/AL 5J SCHOOL. DIST"F21CT IS THE MA TTITUCK-CUTC,~'GbE 6.,) FIRE[ J~VSTRICT : MA TTITUC,~ LOT: 'WI TT ~00.00' s ~.~o/~o'4_o_'.'_w I HERE~ COMP L SEEN £ LOTS/, ?H/S /-S THC P~ THE L' WI?HO AS SH~ HOLLOW KEY MAP SCALE: 1" = CERTIFY TI-I~T THIS PLAT WAS MADE FRC~.¢ AN AC7'UAL SURV,~Y ),'vlPLETED ~Y US ON 4/~6/91 AND THaT CONCRET~ A4ONO, v,,_~,t~ , ,~ -- wATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE D/$POS/~L ,F~CIU'F'ES FOR ~LL TS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT COMPLY W/TH THE S '.QU/REMENTS OF THE 3UF/~OLK COUNTY/?EP~R~/~fEN7 STEVEN d. HY~4~N hz. Y.S. P.E L/C, No. 059~81 -tl3 I$ TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLI~N HAS BEEN APPROVED BY YE PLANNING I90~RO OF SoUTHOLD 8Y RESOLUTION DA ?'ED. CHAIRMA/~ PLANNIN~ BOARD DA TE : ~E LOT LINES OF SUBDIVISION MAPS AS F/LED, C,~/VNQT BE ALTERED THOUT pERM/SS/ON FROM THE PL~N/VING BO~R/D. /SND L O T.9 /1..¢US T ~E SOLD ; SHOI4/N ON THE SUBDIVISION MAP, MINOR SUBDIVISION MAP OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVIQ HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H, COMMISSIONER May 29, 1991 Melissa Spiro, Planner Town of Southold Planning Department Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Bergen Hollows SCTM # 1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Ms. Spiro: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received your letter dated April 23, 1991, regarding the above-referenced proposal. * Lead Agency Designation Our agency has no objection to the Town's designation as lead agency. * Sanitary Code Compliance: Jurisdiction and Application Status: Under the authority of the Article 6, of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, the SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems. The applicant, therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system without Health Department approval. Our agency has no record of a current application for this proposal. We encourage the project sponsor to submit an application to the SCDHS at the earliest date so that a technical assessment of this action can be made. Letter to Melissa Spiro May 29, 1991 Page 2 Based on the limited information reviewed, it appears that the subject proposal can conform to the density and approval standards of the SCSC. * Natural Resources Protection Based on the site survey provided for review, it appears that the subject parcel contains two significant kettle depressions in the vicinity of the proposed developmem. In an effort to provide for the protection of these unusual geologic features, we recommend that the Town requhe the designation of these areas as open space and encourage their long-term protection through the establishment of appropriate scenic easements. We believe buffer restrictions should be imposed which provide for no future disturbance, clearing, construction, or filling in these areas. Furthermore, we encourage the establishment of building envelopes on those lots containing kettle depressions so that the extent of allowable future development is clearly indicated to the property owners. We appreciate the opportunity to review this application. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 548-3060. Sincerely, Robert S. DeLuca Biologist Office of Ecology cc: Vito Minei, P.E. Louise Harrison Stephen Costa, P.E. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: DATE: John Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~/.~ Chairman May 22, 1991 RE: Minor Subdivision Bergen Hollows SCTM~ 1000-112-1-16.1 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York ! 1971 Fax (516) 765-1823 The Planning Board is in receipt of your letter of May 30, 1991, in reference to the above mentioned subdivision. The ten (10) acre parcel on which this subdivision is located was created by a set-off from a 107 acre parcel. The set-off created one parcel 10 acres in area, and another parcel approximately 97 acres in area. There are several perched ponds and wetlands areas on the 97 acre parcel. However, in the Planning Board's Environmental Consultant's review of the Long Environmental Assessment for the minor subdivision, he notes that the subdivision of the 10 acre parcel will not affect these resources, and the surface water features are in excess of 900 feet away. A copy of his report is enclosed. The proposed major subdivision (Heather Hills) of the 97 acre parcel is inactive at this time. When the applicant decides to proceed, the Planning Board will coordinate with your office. enc. TRUSTEES lohn M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Ir. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Planning Board BOard of Trustee Bergen Hollows-SCTM ~1000-112-1-16.1 Norris Estates-SCTM ~1000-122-5-4 &123-6-2 May 30, 1991 At the regular meeting held on Thursday, May 2, the Board of Trustees reviewed the above referenced subdivisions. The Trustees do not wish to take lead agency, but would like the Trustees' consultant to flag the wetland line. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. JMB: j mt CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS May 14, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re.' Review of EAF Bergen Hollows SCTM# 1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Benny: As per the your request of April 23, 1991, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. o Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The site includes 10.00 acres of land, proposed to be subdivided into four (4) lots, all in excess of 80,000 square feet. The parcel was at one time part of a larger parcel which extends north to Long Island Sound, and includes several perched ponds and wetlands areas. The subject 10 acre land division will not affect these resources, and the surface water features are in excess of 900 feet away. The overall 10 acre site is presently occupied by a home, with associated barn structures, and a horse paddock. The home will remain on Lot 1 and the barns will remmn on Lot 3. New structures are proposed to be constructed on Lots 2, 3 and 4, following approval of the land division. There are significant depressions, located on Lot 1, and between Lots 3 and 4. These features can be and should be avoided in locatin~ homes on these lots. The depressions are grassed, and are not characteristic of natural geologic features, as the vegetation and grades have been modified. The balance of the site consists of meadow and grassed areas. There are large maple tress lining the driveway on Lot 1, and there is an area of maple trees and ornamental trees west of the eastern depression, on Lot 2 and 3. The site is located in Groundwater Management Zone IV (outside of the water budget area), and will conform to SCDHS density requiremen'ts. The site is in a 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Page 1 of 2 Bergen Hollows Long EAF Review general area which has been impacted by nitrate and aldicarb contamination according to the North Fork Water Supply Plan. SCDHS Article 4 approval for a water source withpossible treatment measures is necessary. The proposed intensity of 1.and use is low (0.5 dwelling units per acre), and is consistent with area use and zomng. The configuration of lots provides suitable means of access, and adequate area for construction of dwellings without significantly impacting site resources. The Planning Board may wish to consider aligning access for all four (4) lots with the bend in Bergen Avenue, in order to avoid a driveway closely offset from this turn which may cause traffic conflicts as the road becomes more heavily utilized in the future. This can be accomplished using a driveway easement for Lot 4, over Lots 2 and 3. The Part I and II Long EAF failed to reveal any significant impacts to site environmental resources, which would warrant the preparation of a Draft EIS. Accordingly, the Board may wish to consider adopttng a Negative Declaration, based upon the reasons outlined herein. I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to complete review of this project. We would he pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questtons. Very/tt~ly y. ours, Charles JffVoorhis enc: Part I/II LEAF RAMER, VOORHIS, &,;,,ASSOCIATES Page 2 of 2 CRAMER, ENVlR¢ May 14, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hail, 53095Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Review of EAF Bergen Hollows SCTM# 1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Benny: As per the your request of April 23, 1991, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. o Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. go Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The site includes 10.00 acres of land, proposed to be subdivided into four (4) lots, all in excess of 80,000 square feet. The parcel was at one time part of a larger parcel which extends north to Long Island Sound, and includes several perched ponds and wetlands areas. The subject 10 acre land division will not affect these resources, and the surface water features are in excess of 900 feet away. The overall 10 acre site is presently occupied by a home, with associated barn struct, ures, and a horse paddock. The home will remain on Lot 1, and the barns will remmn on Lot 3. New structures are proposed to be constructed on Lots 2, 3 and 4, following approval of the land division. There are significam depressions, located on Lot 1, and between Lots 3 and 4. These features can be and should be avoided in locating homes on these lots. The depressions are grassed, and are not characteristic of natural geologic features, as the vegetation and grades have been modified. The balance of the site consists of meadow and grassed areas. There are large maple tress lining the driveway on LOt 1, and there is an area of maple trees and ornamental trees west of the eastern depression, on Lot 2 and 3. The site is located in Groundwater Management Zone IV (outside of the water budget area), and will conform to SCDHS density requirements. The site is in a 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Page 1 of 2 Bergen Hollows Long EAF Review general area which has been impacted by nitrate and aldicarb contamination according to the North Fork Water Supply Plan. SCDHS Article 4 approval for a water source with possible treatment measures is necessary. The oroposed intensity of la. nd use is low (0.5 dwelling units per acre), and is conslstent w)th area use and ~ zomng. The configuration of .lots provides suitable means of access, and adequate area for construction of dwelhngs without significantly impacting site resources. The Planning Board may wish to consider aligning access for all four (4) lots with the bend in Bergen Avenue, in order to avoid a driveway closely offset .from this turn which may cause traffic conflicts as the road becomes more heavily utihzed in the future. This can be accomplished using a driveway easement for Lot 4, over Lots 2 and 3. The Part I and II Long EAF failed to reveal any significant impacts to site environmental resources, which would warrant the preparation of a Draft E. IS. Accordingly, the Board may wish to consider adopting a Negative Declaration, based upon the reasons outlined herein. I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to complete review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very tyu;lyy~urs, ~-~Charles J~qoorhis enc: Part I/II LEAF Page 2 of 2 TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TO: FROM: RE: Planning Board Board of Trustee Bergen Hollows-SCTM 91000-112-1-16.1 Norris Estates-SCTM 91000-122-5-4 &123-6-2 DATE: May 30, 1991 At the regular meeting held on Thursday, May 2, the Board of Trustees reviewed the above referenced subdivisions. The Trustees do not wish to take lead agency, but would like the Trustees' consultant to flag the wetland line. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. JMB:jmt CR,A,,MER, VQ~RHI,.$,, ~,A~SOOIATES E NV IRC N MENT~,~ AN~I~.,P~N~!;~NG CONSULTANTS May 14, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hail, 53095Main Road P.O. Box 1i79 $outhold, NY 11971 Re: Review of EAF Bergen Hollows SClM# 1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Benny: , " As per the your re.quest of April 23, 1991, we hav. e.¢.ompleted a ~,r. eliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by C. VA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended es necessary. A copy of same is attached. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Addi¢onal information concerning our findings is included below, Advise as Necessary ..... The parcel has been inspected anti environmental references concerning the stte anc~ area .h.ave b.een consulted. The S. lte includes 10.00 acres of land, proposed to be subdx~ded into four (4) lots, all m excess of 80,000 square feet. The parcel was at .one time part of a larger parcel which extends north to Long Island S~ound, and includes s?eral perched ponds and wetlands areas. The subject 1.0 acre land division will not affect these resources, and the surface water features are m excess of 900 feet away. The overall 10 acre site is presently occupied by a home, with associated barn struct, ures, and a horse paddock, The home will remain on Lot 1, and the hz. ms will remain on Lot 3. New structures are proposed to be constructed on Lots 2 3 and 4, following approval of the and division. There are significant depressions, located on Lot l, and between Lots 3 and 4. Tl~ese features, can-be and should be avoided in locatin$ homes on these lots. The depressions are grassed, and are not ch.aracterlstm of natnral geo. logic features, as th~ vegetation and grades have been modified. The balance of the she c.onsists of meadow a.nd grassed areas. There are large maple tress lining the driveway oa Lot 1, and the.re ~s an area of maple trees and ornamental trees west of the eastern depression, on Lot 2 and 3. The site is located in Groundwater Managemen. t Zone ,IV (outside of the wa.ter budget area), and will conform to SCDHSdens;ty reqmrements. The site is ~n a 64 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, M~LLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Page I of ! Bet-ge'- Hollows Long EAF Revlu~ general area which has been impacted by nitrate and aldicarb.contamination according to the North Fork Water Supply Plan, $CDHS Arttcle 4 approval for a. water source withpossible treatment measures is necessar7, The proposed intensny of land use is low (0.$ dwelling units per acre), and is consistent w~th area use and zoning. The configuration of.lots provides .sult, a..ble mc.aris of a, ccess, and adequate area for construction of dwelhn~s without $~gm£1cantly ~mpactmg site resources. 'rite Planning Board may wish t,o cons')der alig. ning access for allfour (4) lots with the bend. ia '~ Bergen Avenue, tn order to avoid a driveway closely qffset from !his turn which ma)' cause traffic conflicts as the road becomes more heavily utilized in the future. This can be accomplished using a driveway ea~sement for Lot 4, over Lots 2 and 3. Toe Part I and II Long E.~F failed to reveal any signlficam '.mpacts to site environmental resources which would warrant the preparation, of a Draft EIS. Accordingly, the Board may wish to consider adoptlng a Negam,e Declaration, based upon the reasons outlined herein. · I ho. pc this letterprovides the board w, ith the !nform.ation needed to complete review of this l~rqect. We·would be pleased to ?rowde additional input upon request. 'Please do not hesitate to call tf you have any questmns. Very tyu~lyy.~ u rs, "--~Charles J~/Voorhis enc: Part I/II LEAF Page 2 of 2 New York State Department of Envl~'onmental Conservation LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION RESPONSE This letter responds to your communication of , regarding lead agency coordination for the above-noted project, under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 6t7. The Department has the following interest in this project: DEC Permits (if ~.ny): ~O~le ppb$d DEC Contact Person: SEQR Classification: [ ] Type I [ ] Unlisted DEC Position: Based on the information provided: [ ] DEC has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. [ ] DEC needs additional information in order to respond (see comments). ~DEC cannot be lead agency because it has no jurisdiction in this action. : ~ see attached [ .] none Comments If you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above, please contact this office to resolve designation of lead agency within the time allowable under Part 617. Please feel free to contact this office for further information or ~liseussion. Si~}cerely, cc: (attach distribution list) · PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 23, 1991 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consu].tants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Bergen Hollows SCTM#1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Mr. Cramer and Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. The Planning Board has received the $400.00 review fee from the applicant. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Encls. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. *~~ Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTY L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (%) Unlisted Contact Person: ~l~,ll~4 501~0 (516)-765-1998 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (><~ This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below). Comments: Please feel free to contact this office cc: Board of Trustees Bui!ding'Departmcnt Southold Town Board Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services ~NYSDEC - Stony Brook S.C. Dcpt. of Public Wer-~s U.£. Army Cord of Enginccrs N.¥.E. Dopt. of Transportation * Maps are enclosed for your.~eview Coordinating agencies for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Prepared by Project Sponsor . ne~e c~,e~e ,ne enbre torm, ra~s A through E, Answers to these questions will be consider, It ~ expected (h~t ~ompiedoa of the ~ul) EA¢ will ~ de~nd~t on in(or~aU.~ currently availJble and will not invok new ~tudies. research or inveid~at~on. If in)orma(ion requirin8 such additional work (s unavailable, so indi~a(~ ~n~ specm each in~tance. n~rC~'n Av~nnp. M*~tituck, New York Henry E. ~aFnor, 320 Love Lane Mattituck . Joseph A. Wanat for W'anat Avenue 11952 8tJSINESS TELEPHONE NY !1,952 minor subdivision of I0 acre parcel into four lots Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. ff not applicable, A. SZte Description Physical setting of overall project, bmh developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ~Urban ¢'llndustrial OForest ~AgricuJture 2. Total acreage of project area: APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) ~Commercial ~Other acres. [~Residential (suburban) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Ankles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unveoetated (Rock, earth or (il() Roads, buildings nnd other paved mrfaces Other (indicate type)_ 1afros , PRESENTLy 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site~ [~Yes ~No a. What is depth to bedrocks ~ (in l~eet) (~Rurai (non-farr~' MAR 2 2 1991 . ,~ 3. What ,s predom,nant soil type{s) on project site? . 1;o.ps a. Sod drainage: [~Well drained ~ % of ~te ~Moderately well drained % of site ~Poorly drained % of site b tf any agricultural land is invo[vetJ, how many acres Of soil are classified withi, soil group 1 through 4 of the NY~ Land Classification System¢ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370} AFTER COMPLETION _ acres _ acres acres -- ~Cres acres .. Registers of Historic Iq~,:~s~ ~Y:~s ~No "~"''~. ~sp~i~ctsubstant~aih~nvg~ust~a~i~e~:[¢d~ntheRugister~fNat~on~Natura~Landmarks?~ ~Ycs ~No & Wh~t is t~e depth of the wa~er t~bl~ ~. 50(~n ieet) 0 ~ site located over: primary, pnncipfd, or sole source ~quffer? ~Yes ~No 10 Do hun(in~, fishin~ or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the prolect area? ~Yes ~No 1L Does p~oject site contain ~ny ~pecies of pi~nt a~ ammal life that is idenuhed ns threatened or end~n~ered~ Identify e~ch specie~ 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms o~ the pro;ect sitel (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other ~eote~ic~l form~uons) OYes ~No Describe 13. is *.he ptolect site presentiy used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ~Yes ~No If yes, expMin 14 Does the present site include scenic views known to be important ~o the commumty~ ~Yes ~No 15. Streams within or cont~uous ~o Otoiect area: :;;'A a. Name ot Stream ~nd n~me at River to which ~: is wibutan, 16. Lakes, ponds, wedand areas witkin or ¢OntL~uous to prolect. area: a. Name _ q/n b. Size (in acres) 17. Is the site served by exist, ir.~ pubhc u~ili:iesf ~Yes a} If Yes, does sutficient capacity ex~s~ :o allow connectioill ~Yes ~No b) ff Yes, ',viii m:provemen~s be necessary to allow connecuon~ ~'es ~No 18 I~ the site located in an agricultural distric¢ certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, ArtiCle 25-AA, ~ectton 303 and 304? ~Yes ~No 19 Is the site located in or substantially cont/~uous to a CUtJcal E~ironmental ,~fe~ designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~yes ~o 20. Has the s~[e ever been used for the disposal of sohd or hazardous wastes? ~Yes ~No C B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale rd project (fill in dtmensions as appropriate) a, Total conbguous acre,ge owned or Controlled by project sponsor , b. Project acreage to be developed: ~_ 10 acres inihally; 10 c. Project acreage to ;cream tu~deve~oped , ~ .... acres. d Length of project, in miles: n/~ -.. (1¢ appropriate) e, If the p~oject is an expansion, indicate percent of e~pans[on proposed ~ /a ~o. L Number o~ off-street parkina spaces exist:n~ _ ; proposed pa g. Maximum vehicular trips get,crated per hour ~ ~ (upon completion o~ project)? h. I[ residential Number and typeof housing One Family Two Family Imtially ~ . Ultimately ~ i Dimens,oas {m feet) ~1 largest proposed ~tructure j, tmeat feet of hOntage along a pubhc thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. code Muhlple Famdy Condom~mum height;_ w~dth,_______length, per to~n town code 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed L~fes ~i'4o a, If ye~,, for what i,~tenduC purpose is t~e site baJng reciaimed? ! b. will topsoil be stockp.led for leclamadon~ ~Yes ~No c. Will upper ~ubsoil be stockpiled tot reclamat~on~ ~es ~No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground cove~) will be removed from site~ . 0 acres. ~. Will any mature fores~ (o~er 1~ years old) or other local~y-impo~ant vegetation be removed by this project~ ~Yes &. If single phase project: Anticipated Defied of construction ~ ~ ,_ months, (inciudin~ demolition). 7. If multi-phase: a. To~al number of phases anticipated (nu~ber). b. Anticip~t~ date of commencement phase I month c. Approximate completion date et flnal phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependen~ on subsequent phases~ ~Yes 8. Will blasting ~cur during cons?friction? ~Yes ~No 9. Numbe~ of jobs ~enerated: during cons?rut?ion 60 ; alter project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any ptojecu or facilities? ~Yes ~No If yes. explain 12. Is surface liquid waste dls~sal involved? ~Yes a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent w,il be dlscha~[ed 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes ~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ~Ye~ ~No [xplain 1~. Is p~oject or ~ny porUon o~ Proiect ~ocated in a 1~ year flood pl~in~ 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the amoun't per month · 4 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~Yes ~No c. If yes, give name Sou .hold Toyn · location ~utcito~tte d. will any wastes ~o~ go mtn a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landhll? ~Yes ~o e. If Yes. explain year, (including demolition). year. 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? EYes GJNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? _ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides~' [:]Yes ~No 19, Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? eyes 20. Will project produce opera[in~ noise exceeding the local ambient noise love[st ~Yes ~No 21. Will prelect result in an increase in energy use~ ~Yes ~No If yes , indicate typ~s) domestfc 22. If water supply is ~rom wells, indica[e pumping c~pacity.5 ~allons/minu~e per SCDOBS 23. Total anticipated w~ter usage pet day 1000 ~allons/day. 24. Does Orojec~ involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~Yes ~No If Yes, ex~lain -. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board C1Yes I~No City, Town, Village Planmng Board []Yes City, Town'Zoning Boacd F3Yes C. ity, County Health Department ~lyes F'iNo 'Other Local Agencies f-lyes Other Regional Agencies ~Yes F~No State Agencies f-lyes f"INo Federal Agencies f'lYes C. Zoning and Planning Information Type subdLv~sion 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zomng decision? ~]Yes I~No If Yes, indicate decision required: [~zonlng amendment t-lzoning var~ance [~]specia( use permit ~'isubdwision [~slte plan ~new/cevision of master plan ~resource management plan ~other 2. What is the zoning cL:.ssification(sJof the Site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? ----- 4 dwellings 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ^_ $. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning,) a dwellln,s ' 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local {and use plans? I~yes 7. What are the predominant land use(si and ZOmng classifications within a % mdc radius of proposed action~ A-C · $ubmitt Date 8. Is the proposed act;on compatible with adjoinin~surroundin[ land uses w,thin a ¼ mile? ~Yes 9. If the p~oposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots ace proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed.;' _ 2 acre 10. Wdl proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ~Yes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, poli, fire protection)~ ~Yes ~No a. If yes, is existing cap~ity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Ye~ ONo 12. Will the Proposed action result in the generation of traffic significandy above pre~ent ievels? a. If yes. i$ the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes ~No O. Informational Details Attach any additional informahon as may be needed to clarify your project, l~ there are or may be any adver~ impact~ associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to m~tigate avoid them E. Verification I ret?dy that the information provided ~bove ,s t~ue to the best of my kno~{edge. Applicant/Sponsor N~me ~nry F Ravn¢~r, ~2en~ ' wHh Ih~s assessment. . g y, COmplete the Coastal Assessment Eorm before proceedin~ 5 q'NING BOARD MEMBERS iett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman eorge Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards elephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. H, Supervis~ Town Hall, 53095 P.O. Box 1 Southold, New Y Fax (516) 76~ RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environment Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of le~ agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evalua; Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your respons~ Project Name: Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (~) Unlisted Contact Person: (516)-765-1998 The lead agency will determine the need for an environments impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or no have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (>~ This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this ac ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead a status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below). Comments: Please feel free to contact this office cc: Board of Trustees Southold Town Board Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services ~NYSDEC - Stony Brook S.C. Pcpt. ef Public Wcrk~ u v.~ Dopt. of ~ ....... ~' ...... ~ ..... ~ ..... lon * Maps are enclosed for your_review Coordinating agencies for further informa~ Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr Chairman Prepared by Project Sponsor as Dart of{he admiration tor~ "'~'~?" ,re iorm ra~s A tnrough ~. Answers to these questions will be . , . ', ~ P~ h~T~b~cL~urther verificat on and pubhc rewew Provide an m~ormahon you ~,eve will b~ n~ to co~pleta-~3,~ ..... It ~s expected that completion of the full FAF will ~ de~t on infot~afi.~n curtendy available and will new studies, research ~ investigation. If intorm~tion requiring such additional work ~s unavailable, so indicate each instance. a~%~n A=~n~,,. MRttituck, New York Henr? E. Eayn~r, AODRE~ 320 Love Lane C~l~fiPo Mattituck NAMEOFOWNE~{II~ift~t) Joseph A. Wanat Bergen Avenue, ~att£~uck jr. - Agen~ for W'anat 8US;N[$$ TELEP~IONE ( 51~ 298-8/~2 f8U$1N£SS TELEPHONE NY minor subdivision of I0 acre parcel into four lots ~lease Complele Each Question-Indicate N,A. if not applicable, Site Description 'hysical setting of Overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas, · Present land use: [3Urban ~lndustria[ ~Commercial DResidential (suburban) [~Rural ~Forest rlAgriculture r'lOthet __ Total acreage of project area: l,O acres. APPROXIMATE ACREACE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLY- Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres Forested Agricultural [Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.] 9 _ acres ~ 4 Wetland (Freshwater Or tidal as pet A~lcJes 24, 25 o(ECL) _ acres Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or (ill) Roads, buildings ~d other paved ~urfaces l. acres 2 Other (indicate type}, l~wns -~- acres 4 What ~s predominant soil typ~s) on project site? . t o~ n o i l. s ~d a, Sod drainage: ~Well drained __o~, % of Yte ~ModerateJy well drained ~Poorly drained % of site b If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres o[ soil are classified within soil group 1 through land Class,fication System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? i'qYes xC]No a. What is depth to bedrockl -- n/= [in feet) 2 2 2 1991 P-.e~.lsters of Historic J:laces~ ~Yes Is project substantiaily con:,guous to a site li:;~¢d on the Register of NaUonal Natural Landmarks? ~Yes What is t~e depth of the w:~er tablet ,~, 50(~n feet) ~ site located over ~ pr~ma~y, prmcip~i, o~ sole source equaled ~Yes Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opporzuni~ies presently exist in ~he project area~ ~Yes ~No Does project site contaJF, any ~pecie~ ~f ~tant o~ ammal life that is identihed as threatened or endA Identify each species Are there any unique ~>t unusu;t land forms o~ the pro;oct si~e? (i.e., chffs, dunes, other geological fort, ~Yes ~No Oescribe Is the Prelect site presently used by the commumty or n,sighborhood as an open space or recreatio, ~iYes I~No If yes, explam Does the present site include scenic views knowr, to be imparta~}t to the commumt¥¢ r-lYes Streams within or contiguous [o pro~ect area: .. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name n./3 .... b. Size (In acres) __ Is the site ser;.ed by exisdn,~ pubhc utilities? ~'fes a} If Yes, does sufficient capacity e×is~ to allow conneciioi]; ~Yes ~No b) ;~ Yes, wilt m~provements be necessary to allow connecuom' ~'es ~No ls the site located m an ~[icuJtut~] d~stric~ certified pursuan~ ~o Agriculture and b4arkets Law, ArticJe SecUon 303 a~d ~047 ~Yes Is the ske located in et substantially cont~uous to ~ Critical E~ironmentaJ of the ECL ~nd 6 NYCRR 61~? ~Yes Has the sl~e ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes Project Description ?hysical dimens,ons and scale of project gill in &mensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or Control{ed by project sponsor ~,0 acres. b. Pro;ect acreage to be developed: __. ]LO 10 _ acres init,ally; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage io i'emain undeve!oped . O acres. d Length of projecL in miles; .~ / a (If appropdaEe) e. l~ the project is an expansion, indicate percent of e~pans~on proposed__ n /~ %; f. Number of off-s~ree~ parking spaces existmA ~; proposed per g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~ (upon compie~ion o~ prolecHt h. If re¢~den[ial Number and type of housing um~s: One Family Two Famd~, Muh~ple Famdy Condomm~um Ultimately ~ ~ i. D~mens~ons bn feet) et largest proposed ~truC~u~e height; width; length. De ~ j. lmeat feet o~ [rontage along a pubhc thoroughfare projectw~ll occupyist , ft. code ~own cod ::. Will disturbed areas be rec!aime~f L~fes ~i',~o E]N/A a. If yes, ~or what i~tend~d purpose is the site being reciaimed? .. 1 b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for leclamationl ~Yes c, Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation1 ~es ~No ~. How many acres of vegetation (t[ee~, s~fubs, ~ro~nd cove~) will be ~emoved ~. Will any mature fores~ (o~er t~ years old) or g[het IocalJy-impo~ant vegetation be removed by thi~ proj~ ~Yes ~o D. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction ~ ,. months, (includmt demolition). ). If multi-phase: a. Total number of phases ~nticipated ,, (number}. h. Antlcipat~ date of commencement phase 1 month .... year, (includini dem, c. Approximate completion dzte of final phas~ .... month, year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~Yes B. Will blasti~8 ~cur during construction~ ~Yes ~No 0 ~. Number o~ jobs ~ener~ted: during construction 40 ; a[~er project is complete ]0. Number of job~ eliminated by this project 0 ,, . il. Will project require relocation of any projec~ or fzcilities? ~Yes ~No If yes, explain ~2. Is surface liquid waste dis~sal involved? ~Yes a. If ~es, indicate type o! waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and ~mount b. Name o~ water body into which effluent will be d~scharged ~ 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposa~ involved? ~Yes ~No T~pe i4, Wil~ sudace area of an existin~ w~ter body increase or decrease by proposal? ~Yes ~No [xplain i$. Is project or any portion ot project located in a 100 year flood plain? i6. Will the project generate solid was:e? I'~tes E]No * a. If yes, what is the amoun't per month · ~' tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used;' 4E]yes f'lNo c. If yes, give name $outho[d T,o..wn ,,. ; location d. will any wastes riot go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill;' e. If Yes. explain E~Yes E3~o Cut cho E3Yes ~hWo i7. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is th~. anticipated rate of disposal? b. If ye~, what is the anticipated site life? .. i8. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? E]Yes ~Yes tons/month. years. ENo i9. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? C]Yes ~No '0, Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ,ambient noise levels? I-lYes · 1. Will project result in an increase in energy use? l~Yes ONe If yes , indicate type, s) dome._~tic elec.tricity '2. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity .,~,,. '3. Total anticipated w~ter usage per day 1000 gallons/day. '4. DOes project involve Local, State or Federal funding~ ~Yes ~No If Yes, explain __ gallonslminute per glNo SCDOHS 4 ')$. Approvals Reqaired: City, Town, Village I~oard nYes F3No City, Town, Village Planmng Board ~Yes f-lNo City, Town'Zoning Board []Yes []No · C. ity, County Health Department ~Yes 'Other Local Agencies E3Yes F1No Other Regional Agencies I~Yes f'qNo State Agencies I-1 Yes Federal Agencies f'lYes DNa C. Zoning and Planning Information Type subdivision 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision,7 ~]Yes If Yes, indicate decision required: C]zoning amendment f"laoning variance C]specia[ use permit gqsubdivision ~site p I~new/revlsion of master plan ~resource management plan [~other 2. What is the zoning cl~.ssification(s]of the site? __A-C 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zon 4 dwellings ~. What is the proposed zonin§ o~ the site? __ ~_~ $, What is the maximum potential development o~: the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zo 4 dwellings 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 7. What are the predominant Jaod use(s) and ZOning classifications within a ¼ mdc radius o~ proposed A-C 8. IS the proposed action compatible with adjoinin~surrounding land uses w,thin a ¼ mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~ ? ac~'~ 10. Will proposed action require an,/ authorization{s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ~y: 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services {recreation, educat fire protectionJ~ ~Yes [~No a. If yes, is existing cap;~ity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~]Yes f-iNa 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of trafi~jc significantly above present revels? a. If yes, is the existing road nelwork adequate to handle the add~honal traffic~ []Yes L"3N D. informational Details Attach any additional informabon as may be needed to clarify your project. If [here are or may be a, impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the rneasure~ which you propose to avoid them E. Verification I certify that the information provided above ,s true to the best at my kno',sledgc. Applicant/SPOnsor Name I~,n;-v F Pavn¢~r. Jr. A~,ent o · ~ ) ./~ - ..... Date 3 .1/9 If,the action is in th~ Coastal ~rea and you are a si-' ......... ,a . , wflh Ibis assessment. - . -.~ -~.cy, complete me Loastal Assessment Form be~ore p SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM~: COMMENTS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFIC[ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: ~oc ~o~',o~%t~ o~ :7~-~Sepk ~q~ coCW~ ~ooo-i~-~-t6,1 Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (~) Unlisted Contact Person: ~Sq~ %,~_~ (516)-765-I938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( X ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below). Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, cc: Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Building'Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook NYSDEC - Albany S.C. Dept. of Public Works U.S. Army Corp of Engin'eers N.Y.S. Dept. of Transportation * Maps are enclosed for your_review Coordinating agencies Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Jr. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 15, 1991 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Fire well location for Joseph Wanat Subdivision SCTM91000-112-1-16.1 Dear Mr. Raynor: Enclosed please find a copy of the map indicating the fire well location as requested by the Mattituck Fire Department. The location of the fire well must be shown on the final maps. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, cB~an~remtatnOrlowski, Jr. Encl. MA'FTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT P.O.. BOX 666, 1000 PIKE STREET MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND, N.Y. 11952 Phone 298-8833 April 11, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski, Re: SCTM ~1000-112-1-16.1 As per the above mentioned sub-division the Board of Fire Commis- sioners beleive that a submersible well located at the Southeast corner of lot %4 would be beneficial to the fire protection of this division. Enclosed print is marked accordingly. Very truly yours, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Dear Mr. Keogh: / /Enclosed p>ea~e find/~) surveys for Please y this office as to whether an fxrew needed. Please s~eci~-..~ ......... Y ells are will be needed. ~ ~ w,~cner shallow wells or electric wells Please reply by~//~ , 1991. Thank you for your cooperation. ' ~ ~ f~~ :~ ~ ~ :~ very truly ~o,rs,~ Y- / ~~~~ ~~'/ ~::~:nOrlowski· e~c. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 Town Hall, 53095 IVlain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Dear Mr. Keogh: Enc~losed .please find { 2) surveys,for __/ . Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply bY /-3-~° , 1990. Thank you for your cooperation. · ~ry tru enc. As per conversation with your office on January 8, 1991 there need for firewells at this time. ~ SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: COMMENTS: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER 188/t PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 2, 1991 SCO'IT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision of Joseph Wanat SCTM~1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 1, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated March 7, 1991 with the following conditions: The name of the subdivision is to be changed to be significantly different from that of the previous set-off. 2 The map is to be revised to show the four (4) lot subdivision only. 3. Building envelopes are to be shown for all lots. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. Five (5) paper prints and two (2) mylars of the final map, all containing a current stamp of Health Department approval, must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. Page 2 Joseph Wanat In addition, the owner of the property must submit authorization for you to act as his agent for the subdivision application. Please note also that in accordance with Section A106-38 E, of the Subdivision Regulations, the Planning Board will be requiring that a Park and Playground fee of $2,000.00 per each vacant lot in the subdivision be deposited with the Town Board. This fee will be required prior to any endorsement of the subdivision by the Chairman. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~3 Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S, McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 26, 1991 ScoTr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765~1823 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Minor Subdivision of Joseph Wanat SCTM# 1000-112-1-16.1 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $400.00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of Long Environmental Assessment Forms. The above mentioned sum must be paid in full by your client before we can authorize our consultant,to proceed with the review. The check should be made payable to the Town of Southold. When the consultants complete their review, the Planning Board will consider their findings in making a determination of whether the project will have a significant environmental impact. Very truly yours, ~ nnett Orlowski, Jr. ~ Chairman MAR 26 '91 08:19 ~-~ P.I ~.i',ICL. OSED HE.R~WI IH CoPY OF gELD SU~.DI V 1 SI ON. PLEASE CALL ME R'I ~9~-842~ 5110ULD THANK ~ZOLJ. yUU rIAVE ~N¥ QLJESI'ILJI',tS. A~enue v~ch Che Noccherl? Z~ne ot ~ergen Avenue; ~U~N~O T~NC~ a~on~ the Sa~d ~e~cer~¥ ~ina o~ ~ergen AVenue South 20 de,tees ~9 o~h~rs; RU~ING T~$~CE along said lands the foIloving five cour~e~ and distances: 1) ;ouch ~9 de~raes &9 minutes 30 seconds ~esC 200.00 2) ~orCh 20 de~ree~ 42 ~inucea 30 geGonds We~c &9.99 lo,marl7 ~f Heather ~ill~ on ~e Sound; 1) North 67 dagreeA 10 ~inu~es 40 se¢0nds Ease 70&.i& 2) South 22 de;rea# ~9 minutes 20 seconds £a~c 573.15 ~eec ~srien AvenueI EUI~NING THENCE along the Northerly line o~ Ser~en Avenue South 67 degrees l0 minutes 60 seconds ~esc 260.00 feet to the point or place ~£ SEClUdING. / Of 1 thl /~de¥ of December iii 89. before me to me know~ tO be the individual described tn ~n~ who executed the foregQIng tnltrument, end acknowledged that executed the same.as 8TALE OF NEW YORK, COUN~ OF On the day of Ill , befor~ me personally came I~, ,me known, who. being by me duly aworn, did depose end uy that he resides at No, that heiethe · the corporation described In and.which exe,~Jted the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of eetd corporation; that the seal affixed t o eefd instrument la such cbrpotete seal; that it wee so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation, end that he signed h narr~ thereto by like order, 0n the day of 19 , befor~ me ' personally came to me known to be the fndlvfduel described in end who executed the foregoing t.strument, end acknowledged that executed the came. STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF On the day of 16 r before me personally came the sub~¢rlblng witness to the foregoing It~atrument, with whore'{ em pe~eonall¥ ecqueimed, who, being bY me sworn, did depose end .,ay that he resides et No. ; that he knowl to be the Individual described In end who executed the foregoing Inetrumem; that he, said subscribing witness, wes p~saent end sew execute the acme; end that ha. said witness, at the same rime ~ubecrlbed h name es w}tness thereto. Wllh Coventot Agaimt Grentor'l Acts Title No. SECTION · BLOCK LOT , CITY OR TOWN COUNTY TO U-'LIFE TITLE INSURANCE Comps~ of New Ya~k U.,.'LIFI[ TITLE INSURANCE Co~npany Of New RETURN BY MAIL TO CON~IJLT YOUI~ L,AWYF3t BEFORL ~N~J. O ~k~ tNSTflVME NT~T14~S iNSTRUMENI Thle Indenture, made the day 0{ December nineteen hundred andeighty_nine Between Hm-ATNER HILLS ON Ttf~ SOUND LIHITED PARTNERSHIPs, with offices ~/o Richard T."~arr, 3,50 ~ifth Avenue, New YerA, N.y.- party o~ the t~rst part end JOSEPIt A. WANAT, ~esiding at 247 Sergen Avenue, Mattit~¢k, N.Y. 11.952 -: .... perry Of the eecond ;,art, Wltnealeth, that the party of the flrgt pert, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other velu~bl~ COn~ide;ation paid by the p~y of the ~acond pert, does hqre~y gr~nt end release unto the p~y of the ~9¢o~pa~, the heirs or succesSOrt arid listens Of ~he pp~y of ~e *econd Dart forever. All that certain plot. piece or I~arcal of tend, with the l;ulldlngs end tmDrovemer, ts thereon reacted..~itDete, lying end betng:t~t~K at Matti~u.ck, Town of Southhold, State of New York, more particularly describ..ed on Schedule A annexed. Together with ell right, title end Intf~rest, If any, of,the party of the first pert In and to any streets and reeds abutting the above described premises tO the center lines thereof; Together with the appurtenances end all the estate end rights of the party Of the flr~;t Dart In add to said premises: To Have And To Hold the premises herein granted unto the pe~y of the ~econd pert, the hells or ~ucces~ors and assigns of the pe~y of lhe second Dart forever. A~d the ge ~y o~ the fir st pert covenants that the polly o~ the ~irsl pe~ haa ~or done or ~uffered anything whereby the s~ld premise~ have been encumbered in any way where,?, excepl e~ eloresgid. And the party of the Ilrst pert. in compliance with Sectfo~, 3 of the Lien Law, ¢ovena~Is thai the pe~y of the first De~ will receive the consideration for this conveyance ~nd will hold the right to receive such consideration es · trust fund tO be applied first for the pu rpo~e of p eying the cost of th e Im~ rovement e~d will e~ply the eam~ first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other put~ose. ,' The ~rd "DaVy" ~hell be con~trued es If it teed '[perlles" whenever the ~ense of Ibis Indenture so require~. I~ ~ltne~l Whereof, the pe~ty et the fi~t p~tt baa duly exe~ute~ ~t~ ~eed the ~ay a~d year first ~bove written. HEATtI~.R HILLS 0N THe SOUND LIMXT~TNERS~XP f MtN LEACHING POOL SECTION LEACHING TYPICAL PLOT PLAN TEST HOLE SLAB COVER,, NOTE WHeReAS applicant has submitted test well information showinq acceptable and potable water supply at the minlmum ~epth of 300 feet thezefore wellB pn ~&ch Individual lot shall b~ installed at a minimum o~ 300 feet total depth unless such individual lot is demonstrated to contain potable water at a FIE No. 12159 #ABS._I , D E C 18199 FILED SEPTIC TANK DETAIL 900 GAL. PUMP C YtlNDER & STRAINER TYPICAL WELL L BERGEN AVE. NO TES /2 TOTAL AREA OF MAP = I0.00 ACRES. 2) · - MONUMENT 3.) SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP IO00~II~LI-P/O LOT, 4.) ZONING D/STRICT IS R-80 RESIDEN77.z~L 5.) SCHOOL D/STRICT IS THE MATT/TUCK-CUTCHOGUE 6.) FIRE DISTRICT: MATT/TUCK ?.) LOTS ~ 3, 8 4 WILL BE GRANTED E~SEM~NTS FOR INGRESS 8 EGRESS OVER PART OF ~OT ~. STANDPIPE 8, S~REEN FOR FIRE PROTECTION AS PER o MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT BERGEN I [HOLLOW ( KEY MAP SCALE ,' I" = 600~ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS MADE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY COMPLETED B Y US ON 4/~/'~/ANO THAT CONCRETE MQIVUMEN?S HA VE BEEN BONDED AND WILL BE SET AS SHdO.L4~N~. / ~'~ ~--./. (~,~ W/LLIA~ J. BARR~T~ N. Y.& L.S. L/C. No. 0~4384 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLAN~ BOAR~ ¢P-~O~THOUZ~Y RESOLU,~"~'lC~V DA TJED. ~Y.. /~~~~~/~ CH~IRMA~ PL~NN/N~ BO~D MINOR SUBDIVISION OF BERGEN HOLL 0 W ! SlTUA TED IN MA TTITUCK, TO WN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK /00 0 /00 200 300 SC~_E: I"=100' BARRETT, BONACC/, HYMAN & VAN. WEELE, P. C. Cons u/ting Engin · ers an d Lan d Survsyors 175~ COMMERCE DRIVE HAUPPAUGE, N. Y. 11788 May 3, 1991 K-4699 N/F JOSEPH 7: MACAR/ ~ LOUIS fl SIMEONE N/F JOSEPH L MACARI 8 LOUIS fl SIMEONE 50" w 7z~ 7~ -~ k ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ %J %' , / ; -- ~ ~ Q ~ / / ~__ ~ ~6 / x~( ~ X ~ ' ~-/ GREATER THANIS~I tlS, PLAN $CAL~.: f'-- I00' LEGEND PROJECT EXIS TING PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ........... CONTOUR LINE ............ LOT NUMBER .......... (~) LIMIT OF WETLAND .......... .'' .... ".-'" ,-/,,-'/s'~eo ~--.~AO~F ~ ~,%-' % IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE , .,o., r.~. " LOCATION MAP /~,~ , ~ .,~ -~4'~' REVISIONS TYPICAL ~ELL DETAIL LEACHING poOL DETAIL SEPTIC TANK DETAIL ' TEST HOLE BORING ~'~ ! GENERAL NOTES PROPERTY LINE ........... ' ASPHALT ROAD ............ ""~ z-~,~. I. THE APPLICANT FOR THIS PROJECT IS JOSEPH WANAT OF BERGE~ AVE., MAffTITUCK, N.Y. ~1952 2. ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES SHALL BE UNDERGROUND. DIRT ROAD ....... 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF IHE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. FENCE ............... WOODED AREA ............ '-'~-'~"~'~.~'~ 4. THE SURVEY DATA WAS TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY YOUNG AND YOUNG OF RIVERHEAD, N.Y., ~....~>~.~.~ AND WAS PREPARED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHODS USING AN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED FEBRUARY 7, 1988. 5. THIS SURVEY INFORMATION IS IN THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUIM AND THE 11952 NEW YORK STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM. 6.ALL PRECAUTIONS SHALL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT EROSION, FLOODING, OR ANY OTHER HAZARDOUS CONDITION. ~/o" ~ N\~.<~ / / / GI. GP' / / I f APR I 9 1991 BERGEN HOL L 0 MATT/TUCK. ~OWNOFSOUTHOLD~ NEW YORK M/NOR SUBDIVISION s.c. T.M #/00o-//P - / -/6./ JOSEPH A. WANA T N/F JOSEPH ~ MACAR! 8 LOUIS £ S/bI£ONE ~ 60 N/F JOSEPH ~ blACARI ~ LOUIS ~ S/~EONE LOT AREAS SHOW.N IN PARENTHESES INDICATE LOT AREA EXCLUSIVE OF AO~SSWAY TO FLAG LOTS. WETLANDS AND SLOPES EXCEEDING 15% . N/F JOSEPH ~ MAOAR/ 8 LOUIS F. SIMEONE (14,3~0~* SF( V m/'IP'50"W TOBE N ?1'; I ~ N O0,200J SF 17.. \ \ \ \ I, 80,069~ SF \ 7 PPO' , 4?8 / 80,100..* SF f _-- i 85, 000_+ SF ~ -- (80.$00z SF) 80, ?00_+ SF · 558 SHADED APJZA INDICATES S~OPES /GRE~C-TER THAN 15% / / , _ / /. 6,6o6 SF (8,:T.. 4002 SF) / / PO0' PLAN SCALE,, I" = I00' v PROPOSED ' BAS~V ..-- / / / / N~I' LEGEND SPOT ELEVATION ........... CONTOUR LINE ........... LOT NUMBER ............ LIMIT OF WETLAND ......... PROPERTY LINE .......... ASPHALT ROAD ........... DIRT ROAD ............ FENCE .............. WOODED AREA ........... SITE DATA TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS.o ....................................... . . · .......... . · . 46 MINIMUM LOT SIZE ....................................... .. .............. · · . · . . . 80,O00SF ZONING R-80 LENGTH OF PROPOSED ROAD ....................................................... 61B0 L! SCHOOL DISTRICT ........................................................... MATTITUCK-~TCHOGUE GENERAL NOTES 1. THE APPLICANT FOR THIS PROJECT IS THE SHAMROCK PROPERTIES CORPORATION OF 350 FISH AVE., RM 1B26, N.Y., N.Y. 1011B. 2. ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES SHALL BE UNDERGROUND. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. 4. THE SURVEY DATA WAS TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY YOUNG AND YOUNG OF RIVERHEAD, N.Y., AND WAS PREPARED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHODS USING AN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED FEBRUARY 7, 1988. 5. THIS SURVEY INFORMATION IS iN THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM AND THE NEW YORK STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTE~!. 6. THE STORMWATER RECHARGE BASIN SHALL BE DESIGNED~TO PROVIDE STORAGE FOR THE RUNOFF FROM A SIX INCH (6") RAINFALL ON THE TRIBUTARY AREA. 7. ALL RUNOFF FROM THE PAVED AREAS 5MALL BE DIRECTGD INTO THE RECHARGE BASIN. UNDE NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL ROAD RUNOFF FLC~ TO OR BE PIPED INTO THE EXISTING WETLAND 8. THE RECHARGE BASIN SHALL BE FENCED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 9. ALL PRECAUTIONS SHALL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT EROSION~ FLOODING, ANY OTHER HAZARDOUS CONDITION. 10. ALL LOTS IN THIS SUBDIVISION ARE 80,~00 sF AND GREATER, ATqD ARE IN CONFORMANCE THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 6 DF(THE 5UFFOLKCDUNTY SANITARY CODE. RE~, PROJECT I-OC~ ~JF OF Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors [] 125 Church Street Malverne, NY 11565 - TEL: (516)599-3663 FAX: (516)593-8160 · 1001 Middle Count~/Road Ridge, NY 11961 TEL: (516) 924-3230 FAX. (516)924-3557 9005 Iqtq I" = I00" AU~, 1990 YIELD MAP OF PROPERTY SITUATED AT MATT/TUCK TOWN OF SOUmO , SWFOLK YC K SI~:PuLK COLWD' TAX M4P. L~STIOCT, I000 SECTION llP OLOCK Ol LOT, 16 LEA CHING POOL SECTION POOL TYPICAL PLOT PLAN TEST HOLE INLET SEPTIC TANK DETAIL 900 GAL. FINISHED 4" DIA. PVC TYPIC4L WELL NOTE WHERSAS applicant has eubmitEed teet well information TE$T BERGEN AVE. SUF~OL~' COUNTY DT-PARTMENT OF HE L1H SERVICES r water ~uppiy 30SEPI4 H. ~j.R, '=q NO TES STANDPIPE S SCREEN FOR FIRE PROTECTION AS PER o MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT I HOLL OW ~ KEY MAP SCALE: I" = 600'-+ 2' HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THiS PLAT WAS MADE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY COMPLETED BY US ON 4/26/9/ AND THAT CON~.RETE MONUMENTS HAVE BEEN BONDED AND WILL BE SET AS SH_~.kI?V/_ / ~'~ W/LL/A~ J. BARR¢T~ J. Y.S. L.S, LIC. No, 034~84 THE ~VATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FAC/L/T/ES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT COMPLY W/TH THE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT O~ HEALT~ THIS IS TO TIFY THA~ ~ SUBDI~ ON PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY TH~ PLA BOARD ~ HOL RE$OLUTION DA T~D. THE LOT LINES OF 5UBDIVISIO~AP WITHOUT PERMISSION ~ROM THE PLANNING BOARD, AND LO I 5--~ , 9E SOLD AS SHOWN QN THE SUBDIVISION MAP. MINOR SUBDI VISION MA P OF BERGEN HOLL 0 W SITUA TED IN MA TTITUCK, TO t/IN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK /00 0 /00 ,iiiiI SCALE.. I"=100' 200 500 BARRETT, BONACC/, HYMAN & VAN. WEELE, P. C. Con.u/ting Engine.rs and Land *ur veyor. 175A COMMERCE DRIVE HAUPPAUGE, iV.. E/1788 May 3, 1991 K-4699 N/F JO$£PH T. MACAR/ 8 LOUIS F.. S/MEONE ./ N /F DOR/S t~, BROWN //i / f ( N \ / / / S22'49'20"E GROSS PLAN SCALE' I" = I00' LEGEND EXIS TING PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ........... CONTOUR LINE . . LOT NUMBER . . . LIMIT OF WETLAND PROPERTY LINE ASPHALT ROAD . . DIRT ROAD FENCE ..... WOODED AREA . . Z GENERAL NOTES 1. THE APPLICANT FOR THIS PROJECT IS JOSEPH WANAT OF BERGEN AVE., NATTITUCK, N.Y. 11952 "2. ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES SHALL BE UNDERGROUND. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. 4. THE SURVEY DATA WAS TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY YOUNG AND YOUNG OF RIVERHEAD, N.Y., 'AND WAS fREPARED BY PHOTOGRAMMETR1C METHODS USING AN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED FEBRUARY 7, 198B. THIS SURVEY INFORMATION IS IN THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DAT§M AND THE NEW YORK STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM. 11952 TEST HOLE BORING 6. ALL PRECAUTIONS SHALL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT EROSION, FLOODING, OR ANY 07HER HAZARDOUS CONDIT.ION. ?. T~E A~]~A OF ?HB ~ARCEL ~0 SE ~UBDIVID~ IS ~0.00 ACRES. IN CON~O~&~NCE WiTH THE RBQUIHE~RHT. S OE AR?TC~,E ~6 OF ?~E SUFFOLK COUNTY SANITARY CODE. 9. THIS PP. OPERTY IS IN THE ~ATTITUCK-CUTCHOGUE SCHOOL DISTIEICT. REVISIONS TJF BP TJF kAURE LOCATION MAP N. T.$. Imm Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors · 125 Church Street Malveme, NY 11565 TEL: (516)599-3663 FAX: (516) 599-6160 [] 1001 Middle Country Road Ridge, NY 11961 TEL: (516) 924-3230 FAX: (516) 924-3557 PROJECT NO. Sc.b.. c DATE JOSEPH A. WA Nil 7' MINOR SUBDIVISION ~C.. ~.114. #1000-112- I- 16.1 PITCH I/4 ~ LEVEL ~ER Fr~ "CONC SEPTIC TANK DETAIL 900 GAL. LEACHING POOL SECTION 4" MIN. DIA. PIPE CAST ~RON, CLAY, BITUMINOUS FIBER, CEMENT ASBESTOS DWELL 20' MIN I0' MIN. SEPTIC TAN) '~ LEACHING POOL- TYPICAL PLOT PLAN F/N/SHED O~?ADE - PUMP CYLINDER 9' MIN. 8 STRAINER TYPICAL WELL','~ SROUNDWA TER TEST HOLE BORING BY McDONALD GEOSCIENCE MARCH/, TEST HOLE NO?E WHEREAS applicant has submitted test well information mhowlnq acceptable and potable water supply at the minimum depth of $0@ 'feet therefore wells pn each individual lot shall b~ installed at a minimum of 300 feet total depth unless such individual lot is demonstrated to co,rain potable water at a different de~th by test well On said lot. N ~7'10'40" 160.00' APPROXIMA 7~ LOCATION OF T~ST ~LL z5, r 94,656 S.F. Lond NIP JOSEPH WANA T ~44.24' 104,~4 S.F. TEST BOLE ~RN 704,~4 ' ~00.00' /14. 6~6 S.F. BERGEN HOLLOW KEY MAP SCALE: I" = 600~ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS MADE FROM AN ACTUAL COMPLETED BY US ON 4/26/91 AND THA BEEN BONDED AND WILL BE SET 1 STEVEN N. Y.~ 12-~,117 S.F. S § 00' BY: DATE: CHAIRIV~N, PLANNING BOARD THE LOT LINES OF' SUBDIVISION MAPS AS F/LED, CANNOT BE ALTERED WITHOUT PERM/SS/ON FROM THE PLANNING BOARD, AND LOTS MUST BE SOLD AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION MAP, MINOR SUBDIVISION MAP OF BERGEN HOLL 0 W ZDO. O0' SITUA TED IN ~s ~?o'~o" w MA TTITUCK, TOWN OF $OUTHOLD ~,~, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YO~K ERG~ AVE. ~o~ ~o ,oo ,~o (50 WIDE) Barrett, Lanzisera, Beckman & Hymen NO TES S.C, DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES Consulf/ng Engineers ond Lond Surveyors~ Church Sfree! 1001 Middle Counfry Rd, Molverne, N.Y. 11565 Ridge, N. Y, 11961 May 3, 1991 K-4899 SUFFOLK CO, NFAL TH DEPt. REFERENCE iVUMB~,, tM~ 91,184 LEA CHING POOL SECTION PRO[~ 25' DWELL 20' TYPICAL PLOT PLAN TEST HOLE SEPTIC TANK DETAIL 900 GAL. F/N/SHED 4" DIA. PVC CASING GROUNDWATER TYPICAL WELL BERGEN A YE. ..... , ,-oART ~IENT OF HE~[ 1 H SERVICES · Water supply ~it ~fl~ with O~lsions of the public E eAith L..v and the NO TES /.) TOTAL ARE~ OF MAP = I0.00 ACRES. 2.) · - MONUMENT 3.) SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP /O00-1/2-1-P/O LOT 16.1 4.) ZONING D/STRICT 15 R-80 RES/DENT/AL STANDPIPE 8 SCREEN FOR FIRE PROTECTION AS PER o MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT KEY MAP SCALE: I" = 600'_+ ON 4/26/91 AND THAT CON ETEM NUMENTS HAVE BEEN BONDED AND WILL BE SET AS WILLIA~.~ARRET~ A~ Y.S. L.S. LIC. No. 034384 THE LOT LINES OF SUBDIVISION MAPS AS FILED, CANNOT BE ALTERED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING BOARD, AND LOTS MUST BE SOLD AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION MAP. MINOR SUBDI VISION MA P OF BERGEN HOLL 0 W SlTUA TED IN MA TTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK /00 0 /00 200 ,500 SCALE: I"=100' BARRETT, BONACC/, HYMAN & FAN. FYEELE, P. C. Consulting Engineers and Lend Surveyors 175~ COMMERCE DR/YE HAUPPAUGE, ~Y. 11788 May 3, 1991 K-4699 FINISHED GRADE k LEA CHING POOL SEC TION ;YELL TYPICAL PLOT PLAN TEST HOLE F/N/SHED GRADt - P/ICH I/8" PER FT. SEPTIC TANK DETAIL 900 GAL. F/N/SHED GROUNDt~ITER TYPICAL WELL BERGEN AVE. NO TES - _-- ,Ao.__e% ,,l 6,) FIRE DISTRICT: MATT/TUCK 7',) LOTS /, 3, ~ 4, WILL BE GRANTED EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS 8 EGRESS OVER PART OF LOT 2, STANDPIPE 8, SCREEN FOR FIRE PROTECTION AS PER o MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT KEY MAP SCALE .' I" = 600~ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS MADE FRO~f AN ACTUAL SURVEY COMPLETED BY US ON 4/26/91 AND THAT CON RTE M NUMENTS HAVE WILL/Alii d. BARReTt- N. Y.S. L.S. LIC. No. 034384 THE LOT LINES OF SUBDIVISION MAPS AS FILED, CANNOT BE ALTERED WITHOUT PERM/SS/ON FROM THE PLANNING BOARD, AND LOTS MUST BE 5OLD AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION MAP, MINOR SUBDI VISION MA P OF BERGEN HOLL 0 W SlTUA TED IN MA TTITUCK, TO tArN OF $OUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK I00 0 I00 200 300 SCALE; I"=100' BARRETT, BONACCI, RYMAN & YAN. FEELE, P. C. Conaulting Engineers and Land Survayorw 175A COMMERCE DRIVE HAUPPAUGE, N. Y. 11788 MaY 3, 1991 K-4699 sou f,,~'~%5,~~ SUFFOLK co, HEALTH DEPI~, REFERENCE NUMBER; WAN~r~?=;'8~ .............. 7.-¸ APR O~ '9i 14:05 I i / / AREA AREA 49' ~, \ PROPOS£D ROADWAY OF MAJOR SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS "HEATHER HILLS ESTATES'~ ./ ~ S22'49'20"E / * 47.8 ® - ~ ~ -~ .... GROSS NET AREA X x AREA AREA / / / 49' 5 Gi. G2' 49.9: / X, N¸