The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-111.-8-5 & 6 ~I Q II a ~ 4 m ME Z I ~ I 9c SITE as -t5 I L,F,1 KEY MAP II T 00) vo 00• r y SCALE • 1-600' f t. LO 3eo. sq 5 461 N yy o 4 + ro N ! ~ v ~r1 \ - mfg ' 183.16' I ; . I .c, .•i 1 I d, °o~ C I 196.84' eP S s' 1 1 N. 78`3820 E mNa A O \ t b ° 1 -co. a: m n ~O De ryp? ` \ v 0 180 %d II \ 20.r LOT ~ w - e NW w ,z v u M ~5 ~aar I I 1 _ m~y r 70--__- O/ I 1 1 L Q N OT W. o- _uPar°.ufc 470.00 ° e w Y W \ _ I 2 he - 236.85 S X8.36-20` W' LOT 168 41,531 Sq ft. S 1 r - M RCAp IIII GARRIN ,,ON SURVEY FOR LOT L/NE C LINE CHANGE FOR NGttINE A. MEYER ES TA TE OF EVANGt'LI A T NASSAU Pi 'SAUPONT TOWN OF SOU7 F SOUTH'OLD AREA OF LOT 159= 45,746 sq ft SUFFOLK COUNT COUNTY MY AREA OF LOT 160= 41,246 sq. ft. VW- M-08 - 05 , 50, NOTE' - Scale: Y"= 5( ALL AREAS TO TIE LINES NOV. 17,199E 17,1992 FEB ? s ?sss Jan. 25,1993 25, 1993 (revisions) sournmoTOSmd f PUNNING BOARD APPROVED BY .~EpF NEW OWNERS yp9 ESTATE OF EVANGELINE A. MEYER PLANNING BOARD ~Q fit. MET2c 'f (i TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THOMAS MEYER . WUNNEWETA ROAD ZONING DISTRICT r - CUTCHOGUE, IV. Y. DISTRICT: R40 ATE Ma Z4,1993 r=.~n o Y LIC. ENO. 49618 p Prepared In accordance with the minlmum LOT NUMBERS ARE REFERENCED TO"AMENDED I PECONIC S ORS, P.C. standards for tllle surveys as established MAP A' OF NASSAU POINT" FILED IN THE OFFICE !5161 765 - 5020 by the L.I.A.L.S. and approved and ado led OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK AUG. /6, /922 P. 0. BOX 909 for such use by The New York Stale Land AS MAP NO, 156. CONTOUR LINES ARE REi INES ARE REFERENCED TO THE MAIN ROAD T!Ile Association. FIVE EASTERN TOWNS T :RN TOWNS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SOUTHOLD, N, Y. 11971 88-4008 j iia t g SCOTT L. HARRIS ! Supervisor PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS u~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ~ P.O. Box 1179 Richard G. Ward . Southold, New York 11971 Mark S McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax (516) 765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1938 May 25, 1993 James E. Fitzgerald Jr. Proper-T-Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, Ny 11935 RE: Proposed Lot Line Change for Estatelrpf Evangeline A. Meyer SCTM# 1000-8-5 & 6 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 24, 1993: The final public hearing, which was held at 7:40 P.M., was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer 100018-Sh& 6Wnlocated at property known and designated as SCTM#; and Nassau Point Road and Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue WHEREAS this lot line change, to be known as proposed lot line change for the Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer, is to reconfigure two lots of 45,746 square feet and 41,246 square feet, both of which have frontage on both Wunneweta Road and Nassau Point Road 61 into two lots, one oad, and d the square feet other 44 in 531 area square having frontage , only on Wunneweta Road, feet in area having frontage only on Nassau Point Road. Both lots have, and will have, existing houses. i ~ Page 2 Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer May 25, 1993 WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8) Part 617, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on May 3, 1993; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said sub4di isionand application at Town Hall, Southold, New York on May , WHEREAS, all of the requirements of the Town of Southold have been met; now therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final survey dated January 25, 1993. Enclosed please find a copy of the map which was endorsed by the Chairman. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, l \(~A~/ ~ G/law Richard G. Ward Chairman Enc. Inspector cc: Curtis Horton, Senior Building Scott Russell, Assessor's office l4O THIS LOT LINE CHANGE BETWEEN _ AND `a IS LOCATED ON v IN SCTM# 1000- il - A Lo LOT LINE CHANGE o Complete application received y t, p, o pplication reviewed at work session 2 ax 71 iNro. OK b iNrn.~ OK Y k~ 11J Applicant advised of necessary revisions - 3 - 3 ~5 ~Z v ` Revised submission received ,xONp.` oK U, N ~ ~ ~ ~ inro. OK 0 Lead Agency Coordination 2 2- 7-33 r n y r r w ~i~ ~wra~ SEQRA determination - 3-73 0 0 Q~Q\ Ass)mc@ L 1~-4 c20"tca Ne9 AL 51319' a ? ly Sent to County Planning Commission ,fin.` oK fl Am 't J o G. xro. Of ~j y w .X Review of SCPC report ~ o u V 3 E3 0 Draft Covenants and Restrictions received tro.` oK Q~A Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed v Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Final Public Hearing ~'a~~43 - Cbse~ o Approval of Lot Line S~2H~4~ 14rov~ ck v \ -with conditions I Ili Endorsement of Lot Line 1 3 - e rse ¢ r 5 7!~ ms 1/1/90 h ~ Z- 0 ATTORNEY AT LAW Suite 404 136-25 371h Avenue Flushing, N.Y. 11354-5468 (718) 539-5500 October 6, 1992 Chairman Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals Planning Board Town of Southold Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Sir: Please be advised that I am the executor under the Will of Evangeline A. Meyer, deceased. As such executor I hereby designate and authorize James E. Fitzgerald, Jr. of Proper-T Permit Services to act in my behalf as my agent in the submission and processing of application(s) for a lot line change involving two properties owned by the Estate, located on Nassau Point Road and Wunneweta Road, and designated by Suffolk County Tax Map Nos. 1000-111-8-5 and 1000-111-8-6, and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of the application(s). Yours truly, 7 O'fie- Anthor F. SeT ' , Exec/ U/W/O Evangeline A. Meyer, dec. AFB/paa i 91993 14-16-2 (2187)-7c • 617.21 ~ SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ? Part 1 ? Part 2 ?Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ? A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ? B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ? C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions PROPOSED LOT-LINE CHANGE: ESTATE OF EVANGELINE A. MEYER Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Resp ~i 9f Ie Offke~s ( Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If diff fro spor6ilffi r~%t Date p. 1 PART 1-PROJECT INFOR MON Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additionalc information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Proposed lot-line change: Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Properties front both Nassau Point Road and Wunneweta )toad, NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE James E. Fitzgerald, Jr.; Proper-T Permit Services (516)7'-4-5800 ADDRESS Post Office Box 617 CITY/PO STATE ZIP Cutchogue NY 1~. NAME OF OWNER (If different) BUSINESS T LEPHONE Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer; Anthony Bellucci Execu ort 7'N-539--tn,- ADDRESS 136-25 37th Ave. CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Flushing Tqy 117554 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION I Lot-line changg between two adjacent properties, both r?f whicr ?re owned by the Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer, deceased. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: []Urban []Industrial []Commercial AResidential (suburban) []Rural (non-tarm) []Forest []Agriculture []Other 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) _ acres acres Water Surface Area _ acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: %,,Well drained ADO % of site []Moderately well drained _ % of site []Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYSL- Land Classification System? 8A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? []Yes %No a. What is depth to bedrock? NA (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed bect site with slopes: *-10% % ?10-15% % ?15% or greater T % 6. Js project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ?Yes KNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a sit listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ?Yes KNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? SdL_ (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? (Yes ?No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ?Yes ANo 11. Does project site contain any species of pla t or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ?Yes KNo According to "AJ' KzYORJ[E/ E Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ?Yes J(No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ?Yes XNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ?Yes XNO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: AOA(E a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name NONE b. Size (In acres) IYA 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ?Yes KNO a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ?Yes ?No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ?Yes ?No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ?Yes >(No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? XYes ?No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ?Yes f$No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: NA acres initially; A_ acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped NA acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA N (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed ~ f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~~,{A proposed NA g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One~Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially o^4 -0- -0- -0- Ultimately ca -0- A/A -0 _ _0 - i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? *9 1, ft. 3 -jZ- cl 00ft-b7ps 0 cbo It &a0J((U 2. How much natural materi, e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed fr, the site? --4)~ tons/cubic yard, 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ?Yes ?No ZN/A a. If yes, for what intend- purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ?Yes ?No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ?Yes ?No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site' acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ?Yes ANo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction _ months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: X a. Total number of phases anticipated /1A (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ?Yes ?No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ?Yes KNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction NA after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ?Yes XNo If yes, explain _ 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ?Yes XN0 a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount _ b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ?Yes 9NO Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ?Yes P(No \ Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ?Yes ANo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ?Yes 01,40 a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ?Yes ONo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ?Yes ?No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ?Yes ;KNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes %No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ?Yes N~N 0 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ?Yes KNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ?Yes KNo If yes , indicate type(s) 22 If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity AA gallons/minute. C 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ?Yes KNo If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type• Date City, Town, Village Board ?Yes %No City, Town, Village Planning Board XYes ?No A&w* 4D1-limp City, Town Zoning Board ?Yes lKNo City, County Health Department ?Yes 1KNo Other Local Agencies ?Yes KNO Other Regional Agencies ?Yes KNo State Agencies ?Yes KNo Federal Agencies ?Yes KNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or. zoning decision? (Ayes ?No If Yes, indicate decision required: ?zoning amendment ?zoning variance ?special use permit ?subdivision ?sit plan ?new/revision of master plan ?resource mar}agement plan Kother ` 11 2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? /lU'~~/D_ 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? NA 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? NA C 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 'Yes ?No 7. What are a predominant Ian u (s) and zoning classifications within a mile radius of proposed action? A Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a mile? Kyes ?No 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ?Yes KNo 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ?Yes IANo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ?Yes ?No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ?Yes (LNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ?Yes ?No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certiWtha e inf rm n rovided abov true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sp -Fit ger 'd, Jr. Date March 5, 1993 Signature _ Title Agent of the owner If the an s in the Coastal r and you are a ate agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with thctjbi sessment. 5 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be i Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ? ?Yes JNo • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ? '..J ''.-Yes ?No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ? --Yes EINo • Other impacts: ? J JYes JNo IMPACT ON AIR 7_ Will proposed action affect air quality? ENO EYES i Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ? -J 'JYes ?No hour. 3 • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ? ? JYes ?No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ? ? ?Yes ?No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ? ? Yes ?No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ? ? ?Yes ?No 3 development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ? J JYes ?No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ENO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ? ? ?Yes ?No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ? ? ?Yes ?No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ENO EYES I Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ? ? []Yes ?No I) migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ) • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ? ? ?Yes ?No } of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important i vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES i 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ENO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ? ? ?Yes ?No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ? ? ?Yes ?No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ? ? ?Yes ?No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ? ? ?Yes ?No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? LINO ?YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ? ? ?Yes ?No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ? ? ?Yes ?No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ? ? ?Yes ?No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ? ? ?Yes ?No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ? ? ?Yes ?No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ? ? ?Yes ?No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO OYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ? ? ?Yes ?No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 9 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ENO EYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 ---"i • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ? 1-1 i ?Yes ENo • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ? ? III ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No I ~ IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ENO EYES i Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ? E 'Yes ?No any form of energy in the municipality I • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ? E ! '.JYes ?No I transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family IIII residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No I NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? - ENO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 I ` • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ? ? ?Yes ENo facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ? E iEYes ?No , ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a E E ?Yes ?No noise screen. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 1 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ENO EYES I Examples that would apply to column 2 i • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ? ? EYes ?No j substances (i e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ? ? ?Yes ?No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ? E ?Yes ?No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance E E []Yes ENO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous t waste. • Other impacts: E ? ?Yes ENo 10 i 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change ?NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ? ? ?Yes ?No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ? ? ?Yes ?No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ? ? ?Yes ?No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ? ? ?Yes ?No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ?NO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2- 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAl~ Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part ! the Full EAF. (To be comp eted by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-114 /4-1/2 1/2,-3 3-5 5 t • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available LJ ? to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ? ? ? _ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? - • A site or structure listed on the National or State ? ?-J C] -_1 Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ? ? ? ? ? • The State Forest Preserve? ? ? L1 - • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ? • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ? j..l Ll 1.. F_'. natural features? • National Park Service lands? ? ? ? 1 ? • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic El ? i..; f..-' r..1 or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ? ? ? LJ' LJ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ? ? !..j ? I. or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? - • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ? ? ? 1-1 ? scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ? ? ~~!--.1 ? ! • County road? El 1-1 P_ =I ? • State? ? ? L] I ? ? ? ? IJ • Local road? 1 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ?Yes ?No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? i ?Yes ?No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *'A mile * 1 mile Essentially undeveloped ? ? Forested ? ? Agricultural ? ? Suburban residential ? ? Industrial ? ? Commercial ? ? Urban ? ? River, Lake, Pond ? ? Cliffs, Overlooks ? ? Designated Open Space ? ? Flat ? ? Hilly ? ? Mountainous ? ? Other ? ? NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *'/2 mile ?Yes ?No *1 miles ?Yes ?No *2 miles ?Yes ?No *3 miles ?Yes ?No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ? ? ? ? Involved in recreational activities ? ? ? ? Routine travel by residents ? ? ? ? At a residence ? ? ? ? At worksite ? ? ? ? Other ? ? ? ? C L 2 14464(2/87)-Text 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 • SEQF Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review T SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM l For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT /SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME James E. Fitzgerald, Jr. Meyer Lot Line Change 3. PROJECT LOCATION: _ Municipality Cutchogue County Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION (street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) - 69 Nassau Point Road and 2456 Wunneweta Road 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: ® New ? Expansion ? Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Lot line change resulting in change of configuration of two properties, both of which are now owned by, and will be owned by the Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer, deceased. 7. AMOUNT OF LANQ .F5ECTED: Initially L acres Ultimately 2'0 acres e. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ® Yes ? No If No, describe briefly , C 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ® Residential ? Industrial ? Commercial ? Agriculture ? Park/Forest/Open space ? Other Describe: Medium-density residential. 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ? Yes IM No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTON HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ? Yes ® No If yes, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ?Yes No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponso name: Ja f 0 Agent Dale: Fah 1j, 1gg3 Signature- f the action is in a Coastal Area, and you are a state a9ency, complete the°- Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this at 'SS t - f OVER 1 A. DOES ACTION EtCEE7 /114Y Tl -.ID It` E tl"C9F F 0.=1 Lt > rdinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. UYes No - B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATE:C FlEYI 1h AE" PROVIDED FOR 0111 I5 TED AC'"ONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.6? If No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved aq,,) ?Yes ?No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOL! OWING: (Answers may be handwritten, If legible) Cl. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality cr quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste productioq or disposal potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain odefly: I C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: i C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: I i C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adapted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain brit ily.l I I i C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. t C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1 G5? Explain briefly. 1 i C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either or type quantity of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? , ? Yes ? No If Yes, explain briefly PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) ' irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. ? Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ? Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Name u, Lead Agencv Ynnt ur type Narne of Nesponsible UlLcer m lead Agrncy role of ke.ponsible Uibcer )iKna[ure O, Nespons,de Olbcer m Lead AKenry )ignalwe of I'mpa,rr 111 d,llPrenl Irom responsible otticeri Date 2 r APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: F 3 ~ FEB I A3 The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) app( a f a subdivision plat accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulati ns thold TM1Ai Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: P 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land tinder application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) Applicant is the agent of the owner. See qtt~iched letter of authorization. 2. The name of the subdivision is to be Not applicable 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) SCTM #1000-111-8-5&6 4. The land is hell by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber .....4134 Page On ...June 6, 1956 Liber .....47.94 Page 9............. On .November ~.6r.. 959 Liber Page On Liber Page On Liber Page On as devised under the Last Will and Testament of .....N/A or as distributee .....N/ A 5. The area of the land is ...?..00, acres, k4ttsal for two lots 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the (late hereof have been paid except No,exceptions 7. The land is encumbered by None mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber Page ..................in original amount of $ unpaid amount $ held by address (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber Page in original amount of unpaid amount held by address (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber Page in original amount of unpaid amount held by address S. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except No exceptions 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts R-40 10. No part of the land lies under water whc Cher tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept ......NO exceptions 11QX~3~~[~F~d~€a{I1~3~;~'&~'sxXti~~z~X}$iX~ixxz36~a67~dit~CdaXsY 12. The land (fit X) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is Not appl.icable 13. Water mains will be laid by . No.t.applicabl.e and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ....NOt..appllCable and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by Not Applicable and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "LB" hereto, to show same. N/A 17. if streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. N/A 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. N/A 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. N/A 20. Li the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". Standard "Bargain and Sale Deed with Covenants Against Grantor's Acts" will probably be used, probably without further restrictions or covenants. 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will he NSA , as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at NIA.... years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". Jamey E. Fitzgerald, Jr. for DATE ..February 17, 1993 Executor Ant y Bellucci ame of ii Agent (Si n ure and Title) per-T Pe Services ost Office ox 617 r°sj°e+ 11935 STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF Suffolk . ss: On the day of..... Fp-b!?.w$?-y before me personally came James E. Fitzgerald r Jr. , . , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ...e..... executed the same. P' Notary Yubtic STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss: On the day of 19......, before me personally came ..........................to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose an(] say that resides at No . .............................that is the of the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. and that signed name thereto by like order. Notary Public PcV 'LA;Nl ING'~3O f RD TONY Asqu HOLD SUFFOLIC-CO, TY Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1935 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBPIITTED YOUR APPLICATIONS FORiS TOT WITH E PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the-Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer to any of the following questions is es, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence. 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined No by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there.any other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? Yes No 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes No 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town.,, State, County, etc.) Yes No 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? Yes No 6. Was this property the subject of any prior. application to the Planning Board? Yes No 7. Does this property have a valid certificate of occupancy, if yes please submit a copy of same Yes No I rtify t he above sta ements are true and will be. relied p`n b the P y!Roared c' n idering this application. Signature oz grope y ota er Feb 17, 1993 James E. Fitzger d, Jr., Agent authorized agent date Attachment to questionnaire for.-the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: On the day of ~e2cfa tY 19'?-3, before me personally came_ James E. Fitzgerald, Jr. to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrum and acknowledged that Alf- executed the sa Notary u is TOWN CLERK 4 6 2 8 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York Phone 516-765-1801 Date 7~_---- - 19 - Southold, 5 Southold, New York 11971 p - CEMD OF Dollars For Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Cash Check J SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANIOG BOARD 5 MAY 1993 Mr. Edwards, r3.f Mr. Wa posed? Motion carried. Mr. Ward: 2:1M.1 . Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer - This proposed lot change is to reconfigure two lots of 45,746 square feet and 41,246 square feet, both of which have frontage on both Wunneweta Road and Nassau Point Road into two lots, one 45,461 square feet in area having frontage only on Wunneweta Road, and the other 44,531 square feet in area having frontage only on Nassau Point Road. Both lots have, and will have, existing houses. SCTM #1000-111-8-5 & 6. Is there anybody here that would like to address the Board regarding this application? Nobody present, what is the pleasure of the Board. Mr. McDonald: Mr. Chairman, I would like to make a motion to close this hearing. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. McDonald: I would like to make a further motion. WHEREAS, the Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer is the owner of the property known and designated as SCTM #1000-11-8-5 & 6; located at Nassau Point Roadand Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue; and WHEREAS, this lot line change, to be known as proposed lot line change for the Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer, is to reconfigure two lots of 45,746 square feet and 41,246 square feet, both which have frontage on both Wunneweta Road and Nassau Point Road; into two lots, one 41,461 square feet in area having frontage only on Wunneweta Road, and the other 44,531 square feet in area having frontage only on Nassau Point Road. Both lots have, and will have, existing houses. WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8) Part 627, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on May 3, 1993; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at Town Hall, Southold, New York on May 24, 1993; and SOUTHOLD TOWN PLAN*G BOARD 6 MAY 0 1993 WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Town of Southold have been met; now therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final survey dated January 25, 1993. Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Edwards, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Ward, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham . Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. (Chairman endorsed maps). Mr. Wa 7:45 P.M. Harold Reese Sr. et al & Otto U Jr. al. T lot line change between Harold Reese, Sr al and Otto Jr. et al is to convey 10,093 square et from Harold Ree Sr. to Otto Uhl, Jr. and to convey 58 square feet Otto Uhl, Jr. to Harold Reese After the lot line ge the Harold Reese, Sr. par will be 98.1563 acres a he Otto Uhl, Jr. parcel be 12.4051 acres. SCTM #1000-22-3-1 18.1 & 18.3. Mr. McDonald: I woul 'ke to make a ion to hold this hearing open. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. A ose in favor? Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. Ward, Or ki, Mr. Edwards, Mr. McD ld. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Mot' carried. Hearings Held Over, om Previous Meetings: Mr. Ward: Hill st Estates Section 2 - This subdivision i~ or twenty lots on 22.9 acres loc in orient. SCTM #1000-1 -8.5. Mr. McDon I make a motion to hold this hearing o Mr. L Second. Mr. rd: Motion seconded. All those in favor? COUNTY OF SUAK ss: SI ATE OF NEW YORK LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the PUBLIC HEARING State of New York. Suffolk Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, NOTICE IS HEREBY County Tex Map Number. a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; GIVEN that pursuant to Sec- rderedon and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, tion 276 of the Tbwn Law, a the west by WunnewetaRoad; has been published in said Long Island 'I ravclcr•Watchmen public hearing will be held by on the east by Nassau Point once each week for weeks the Southold Town Planning road; on the south by land -14 Board, at the Tbwn Hall, Main now or formerly Edward A. 3 Road, Southold, New York in Meyer and wife; on the north successively, commencing on the ..........el said Tbwn on the 24th day of by land now or formerly of May 1993 on the question of Martin J. Vandyne and Phyllis the following: Vandyne. clay of 19 j. . 7:30 p.m. Final approval of 7:45 P.M. Final approval for the minor subdivision for the lot line change for Harold - . . . . Hanauer/Bagley -Too Bee Reese Sr., et al, and Otto Uhl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Realty, at Southold, in the Jr., et at, at East Marion, Town ' Tbwn of Southold, County of of Southold, County of Suf- Suffolk, State of New York, folk, State of New York. Suf. Suffolk County Tax Map folk County Tax Map Sworn to before me this ............1J....... clay of Number 100-50-6-4 & 5. Number. 100-22-3-15.1, 18.1 & The property is bordered on 18.3. the north by land now or The property is bordered on "'971.-7 ,19..x:. formerly of Hanauer & the north by Dam Pond and Bagley; on the east by Long Island Sound; on the Lighthouse Road; on the west by land now or formerly south by land now or former- of Otto Uhl Jr., et al, George jy of A. McGunnigle; on the F. Russel, Otto Uhl Jr., Russell ~?-<-zli west by land now or formerly V. and Catherine Broach and Notary Public of A. Stepnoski. Frank R. Russel; on the south 7:35 P.M. Final approval for by land now or formerly of BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER 4 lot line changes being pro- Margaret Gruimaris; Dorothy NOTARY PUBLIC, State of l:m York cessed concurrently for the E. Cook and John and Luz No.4°0046 Harbes Farm at Mattituck, Psaroudahis; on the east by #e l u_Scflclk County Town of Southold, County of land now or formerly of Camn'iission Expires 8~•3~~9y Suffolk, State of New York. Myron B. Brown, Frank E. Suffolk County Thx Map Begora, Jr. and Iris R. Begom, Number. 1000-120-341.2,11.3, Ronald Edeen, Jr. and Bar- 11.4, 11.5, & 11.6. bara Edeen, Frank R. Russel The property is bordered on and others, Andrew Lettieri, the north by Sound Ave; on Joseph Frederick Gazzo, Ber- the west by land now or nice Lattieri, and Joseph formerly Kajawski, Big E, and Frederick Gazza. easterly line of Riverhead Any person desiring to be Town; on the east by land now heard on the above matter or formerly of Lebkuecker, should appear at the time and Nedoszytko, Bakowski, and place specified. Aldrich Lane; on the south by Dated: May 11, 1993 land now or formerly of Cain BY ORDER OF THE and Lebkuecker. SOUTHOLD TOWN 7:40 P.M. Final approval for PLANNING BOARD the lot line hart a for the Richard G. Ward Chairman a afthogue, wt" 1X-5/13/93(1) Southold, County of Suffolk; { r R turf MAY 171993 =~o~Og~FFOCKC G 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 0 T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Oj ~a Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 , Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 4, 1993 James E. Fitzgerald Jr. Proper-T-Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Lot Line Change for Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer SCTM# 1000-5-5 & 6 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 3, 1993. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, May 24, 1993 at 7:40 P.M. for a final public hearing on the maps dated January 25, 1993. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Si jre l ic ar G. Ward Chairman Encl: • ~~SUFFO(,~-c • O Gym c r: .c PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance May 3, 1993 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer SCTM#: 1000-111-8-5 & 6 Location: Nassau Point Rd. & Wunneweta Rd. Cutchogue SEQR Status: Type I ( X) Unlisted ( ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No ( X) Description of Action: This proposed Lot Line change is to reconfigure two lots of 45,746 square feet and 41,246 square feet, both of which have frontage on both Wunneweta Road and Nassau Point Road into two lots, one 41,461 square feet in area having frontage only on Wunneweta Road, and the other 44,531 square feet in area having frontage only on Nassau Point Road. Both lots have, and will have, existing houses. • 0 Page 2 Estate of Evangeline A Meyer - May 3, 1993 SEQR Negative Declaration Cont. Reasons Supporting This Determination: This project involves a lot line change that will result in two lots both with existing houses; thus the change will not be a more intensive use of the land. The applicant will have to comply with the require- ments of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems . Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and site details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not considered significant due to the an- ticipated project compliance with established require- ments of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) and and the required obtainment of the relevant permits. An Environmental Assessment has been submitted and reviewed. It was determined that no significant effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Commissioner, NYSDEC, Albany Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant COUNTY OF SUFFOLK G ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE HIBBERO. M.D• MARY . M.P•H• E• COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES April 12, 1993 Robert G. Kassner Yla rmag Board Ton of Southold Town Hall - 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Lot Line Change of Estate of Evangelhte A. Meyer SCTM 1000-111-8-5 & 6 Kassner: our letter dated March 23, 1993, Dear Mr. ent of Health Services (SCDHSon has received Town's designation as lead agency. The Suffolk County Department application, and has no obj to the concerning the above-referenced app requirements of SEQRA pemumng to expedite the Procedural resenting several of our the refore, general in nature, representing correspondence is intended primarily The department wishes, however, to reserve its right to establishment of lead agency. The comments provided below are, azding Suffolk County prOjbets established for this action. mos t common concerns reg provide more detailed information within the comment periods Code (SCSC) systems, pursuant to Suffolk County Sanitary sat and water supply hcaand must comply with all relevant 1. The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal ns should not undertake the the authority and requirements of Articles 4, 5, 6 ly and sewage disposal. density and construction standards for water supply ant approval' construction of, or connection to, either system without Health Departm licable, the department regulates the storage, handling and discharge of restricted toxic and hazardous 2• Where app uirements of Articles 7 & 12 of the SCSC* materials pursuant to the req consistent with an application has not yet been submitted to act the designs SCDHS, submitted to the departme. one should be filed at nt the should earliest be date to fully allow or the 3 If technical review of the proposed action project SEQRA Process. any action currently under review through t conditions, water supply information, and Trding subsurface soil location 4. Design and flow specifications, inforntano°reg complete design details are essential to the review of this Project, and are evaluated fully at the time o ap wire additional environmemal information (Such as a DEIS discussion of the compfiaz review. Should the town req requirements of the SCDHS should be required. sewage disposal systems. Y articul concern to the department r u~Honin areas which because of elevated groundwater conditions, or sot 5. Of p of conventional subsurface salutary s _ ar co uently require the use of fill or the etitrStq@pC~e s th which are not conducive to the P agency should be aware that such cuditions fres coostmcted in conformance F 1yR 1 R~ L9 accommodate subsurface sanitary disposal system ll f DIVISION Oi ENVIRONMENTAL DUALITY ? s COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD. N.Y. 11901.3399 gDOiHOLDIDy7~ 852-2100 +.~4i1^li, gDARDx.._ Letter to Robert G. KassnO April 12, 1993 Page 2 6. The department is also significantly concerned with areas where access to potable water may be constrained by unacceptable groundwater quality and the lack of an available public water supply. All private water supply systems must be constructed in conformance with requirements of the SCSC. H. NATURAL RESOURCES: 1. The SCDHS fully supports all efforts to maximize protection of natural resources which may be impacted upon by construction and development activities. It is the position of the department that the SEQRA review process provides the greatest opportunity for comprehensive consideration of these resources, and that all practicable planting measures should be employed to help ensure their protection. Of particular concern to department is the adequate protection of wetlands, surface waters, natural communities, contiguous natural habitats, and rare, threatened and endangered species. In addition, efforts to protect sensitive physical resources such groundwaters, dunes, bluffs, shorelines, natural drainage channels, groundwater recharge areas, and steep slopes are fully supported and encouraged by the SCDHS. In general, the department encourages the following land use measures be considered (where appropriate) to actions being reviewed pursuant to SEQRA. 1. Maximum practicable setbacks from all wetlands, surface waters, dunes, and bluffs. 2. Non-disturbance buffers between wetland limits and required structural setbacks. 3. Clustering of subdivision lots to provide for maximum preservation of large contiguous areas of dedicated open space. 4. Stringent clearing limitations which can reduce potential impacts to wildlife habitats, vegetative communities, and unconsolidated soils. 5. Maximum practicable confinement of development to areas with slopes of less than 10%. 6. Maximum use of native species for landscaping purposes. 7. Construction of recharge areas, so as to minimize the amount of disturbance and structural modification to the site. 8. Maximum use of land-banked parking on commercial sites. 9. Minirnal use of fertilizer-dependant turf and landscaping. 10. Employment of stormwater runoff control measures necessary to maintain runoff on-site. The department appreciates the opportunity to participate in the SEQRA review of this proposal. Additional information may be provided prior to the close of the established comment period. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078. Sincerely, uzl rn d'r®`'`^' Kimberly Shaw Sr. Environmental Analyst Office of Ecology KS/amf cc: Vito Minei, P.E. Stephen Costa, P.E. 3 ~A PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS COD 0 . SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Wardr Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 23, 1993 James E. Fitzgerald Jr. Proper-T Permit Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Lot Line Change for Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer SCTM# 1000-111-8-5 & 6 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 22, 19931 BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this Type 1 action. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward 45 Chairman o - PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS yi. 4t T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. rh~j ~~O Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P,O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 ~`~22v~/ a 3 19 q3 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assi you in your response.- Project Name: Q ' x,,a~F ao - '0 d-6 Requested Action: S 7y6 p a .2 6 y s SEQRA Classification: Typ (x )Unlisted Contact Person: ' • -r k A S S/-/ E„ (5 )-765-1938 Proper-T Permit Services POST OFFICE BOX 617, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (516)734-5800 March 5, 1993 Richard G. Ward, Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application for Lot Line Change - SCTM # 1000-111-8-5&6, Estate of Evangeline A Meyer Dear Mr. Ward: Enclosed is the Long Environmental Assessment Form requested in your letter of 2/23/93. If there are any questions, or if additional information is needed, please call me. ou tru J es E. Fitz ald, J . Enclosure: / Full Environmental Assessment Form MAR ' 8 1993 € a subsidiary of THE PECONIC EASTERN CORPORATION Uf Ffl(k G PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr.1{f~ Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 23, 1993 James E. Fitzgerald Proper-T Permit Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, NY 11971 RE: Proposed Lot-Line Change for Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer, Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue Zoning District: Low Density Residential (R-40) SCTM# 1000-111-8-5 & 6 Dear Mr. Fitzergrald: The Planning Board has received your letter of February 17, 1993, regarding a Lot-Line Change for the estate of Evangeline A. Meyer. The project is within five hundred feet of the Peconic Bay Estuary, which is a Critical Environmental Area (CEA). A Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) is required as part of the environmental review. Enclosed is a copy of a (LEAF) for your convience. As soon as the Board receives the completed (LEAF), it will proceed with its review. If you have any questions, or require further information please contact this office. Sincerely//, Richard G! Ward Chairman • ~ SG~3F-rG~ or.c,~ 108 Proper-T Permit Services Ac POST OFFICE BOX 617, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (516)734-5800 February 17, 1993 Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ~r Re: Application for Lot Line Change SCTM # 1000-111-8-5&6, Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer Dear Sir: Attached are documents prepared in support of application for approval of a lot line change between two properties, both owned by the Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer, deceased. Proper-T Permit Services represents the Estate in this matter, and a letter of authorization from the Executor is part of this submission. The nature of the requested change is such that an affidavit concerning the merger of the properties does not appear to be applicable. The change is requested in order that the holdings consist of two properties of more logical and practical configuration, and more in keeping with the present and anticipated land usage in the area. If there are any questions, or if additional information is needed, please call me. tru 4etj4 "James E. Fitz ald, Jr. Enclosures: r Letter of Authorization ~ Filing Fee ($50) Application for Approval of Plat Planning Board Questionnaire Letter, Re: Drainage, etc.FEB , 91 Survey Maps (8 copies) Short Environmental Assessment Form S THTHOLt7 , &L- ~ P! AN^i!N" a subsidiary of THE PECONIC EASTERN CORPORATION Proper-T Permit Services POST OFFICE BOX 617, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (516)734-5800 February 17, 1993 Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application for Lot Line Change SCTM #1000-111-8-5&6, Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer Dear Sir: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the requested lot line change and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. trul , / es E. Fitz ald, Jr r- ; t FEB 1 9 1993 a sCa;7t;r•.a a subsidiary of THE PECONIC EASTERN CORPORATION