Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-109.-1-23 (2)
Irl�so� THJS h A16R`SUtB—DI Z`S�7I8 O�R�, Ls PjG �O la ON ACRES LOCATED ON IN SCTM# 1000- /o — / — Complete application received Application reviewed at work session INro. oK PN OK INro. Applicant advised of necessary revisions 0241 IV Revised submission received � Z V Iro.` CJ +0D 1 OK INro. Sketch plan approval _ -with conditions io�a91_(d,�'Q Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination Sent to Fire Commissioner /o- Receipt of firewall location I v _ Notification to applicant to include on final map ►'� �, Sent to County Planning Commission 2 5 9�- Iro.` oK Receipt of County Report Iro.` oK ; Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received INro. oK Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received i Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval . Final Public Hearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions Endorsement of subdivision 0 T FORM N0. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-22098 Date JANUARY 11, 1993 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ALTERATION Location of Property 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE NEW YORK Hamlet House No. Street County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 109 Block 1 Lot 23 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. _ conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated JULY 31 1987 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 16675-Z dated DECEMBER 15 1987 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ALTER & CONVERT SEASONAL ANTIQUE STORE TO ARCHITECTS OFFICE AS APPLIED FOR. The certificate is issued to PETROL STATIONS LTD. (owners) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N-104736 - NOVEMBER 27, 1989 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A Bu ing Inspector Rev. 1/61 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ICE OF BUILDING INSPECT TOWN: HALL SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NONCONFORMING PREMISES THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the Land Pre C.O. #- Z- 15156 _/ Building(s) Date- December 31 , 1986 / / Use(s) located at 25235 Main Road Cutchogue , N .Y . Street Hainlet shown or. County tax map as District 1000, Section 109 , Block 01 , Lot 23 does{not)conform to the present Building Zone Code of the Town of Southold for the following reasons: Insufficient front yard set-back ; shed has insufficient side yard set back . On the basis of information presented to the Building Inspector's Office, it has been determined that the above nonconforming C/ Land /'T{ Building(s) /_/Use(s) existed on the effective date the present Building Zone. Code of the Town of Southold, and may be continued pursuant to and subject to the appli- cable provisions of said Code. IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED that, based upon information presented to the Building Inspector's Office, the occupancy and use for which this Certifi- cate is issued is as follows: Property contains 2 story , one family, wood framed dwelling ; 2 story shop , wood framed garage ; 2 sheds , and all situated in the 'A' Residential Agricultural zone with access to Main Road ; a State Road The Certificate is issued to JANE MARIE MORRIS & AMY KING (ESTATE OF (owner, l*Mp1WXWx A)cJosephine Rowla of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICA'T'E NO. N/A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the owner of the above premises HAS NOT CONSENTED TO AN INSPECTION of the premises by the Building Inspec- tor to determine if the premises comply with all applicable codes and ordin- ances, other than the Building Zone Code, and therefore, no such inspection has been conducted. This Certificate, therefore, does not, and is not intended to certify that the premises comply with all other applicable codes and regula- tions. e 'tuiidin- inspector w 1046.e(21871—Text 12 PROJECT I.D.NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C SF State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATIONFor UNLISTED ACTIONS Only 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) J. Kevin McLaughlin 2. PROJECT NAME -. J. PROJECT LOCATION: Minor Subdivision-Petrol Stations Limited Municipality Cutchogue – 1. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address anuffolk d road intersections,prominent landmarks.etc.,or provide map) - Parcel is located along Main Road in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, 264.57 feet Aof Alvah's Lane - weet S. IS PROPOSED ACTION: UNew ❑Expansion ❑Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Minor Subdivision into three lots of the existing 5.836 acre parcel. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially 5.836 - ----�_ acres Ultimately 5.836 8. ,WV�IILLL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OT aLAND USE RESTRICTIONS? (! "9I Yes ❑No It No,describe briefly g. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ®Residential ❑Industrial Describe: ®Commercial ©Agriculture ❑ParWForest/Open space ❑Other mixed commercial and agricultural-residential area 10. 00ES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROygL 0R FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ®Yes ❑No If yes,list agency(s)and permit/a ovais Suffolk County Health DePp artment Article 6 approval It. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? _ ®Yes ❑No It yes, list agency name and permit/a pproval Site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board regarding the architects Office On Lot 3. 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes ®No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE DEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: I evi n 'n Date: 2/28/90 Signature: ------------ 1 action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this asslesament OVER PART II—ENV!!ONMlow ENTA - - - A. ODES ACTION EXCEED qI SESSMENT (To be completed by Agenc ❑Yes =I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, pA ❑No RT 617.12? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the F B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS pgpylDED F may De superseded h FULL EAF y another Involved agency, OR'UNLISTED IN 8 NYCRR,PART 617.6? ❑Yes ❑No 11 No,a C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN negative tleclar Cl. Ex Potequalityntial ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may De hantlwritten,If IeglDle) potential for erosion,dra,dae or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic 9e or flooding Problems?Explain briefly: patterns, solid waste production or dlsp- C2. Aesthetic,agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain bt CJ. Vegetation or fauna, fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly: Ca. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted.or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain bit Cs. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly. C6. Long term,short term,cumulative,or other effects not Identified in CI-Cs?Explain briefly. CT Other impacts(Including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED 70 POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? ❑Yes El NO If Yes,explain buefly ' PART III—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed b INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, y Agency) Each effect should be assessed in connection determine whether it is substantial,large,important irreversibility;(e)geographic scope; and ( with its (a) setting portant or explanations contain sufficient detail to show ghat al relevant nese adverse attan or rural); (b) Probabilityof Occurring; Otherwise(Tse siation; (d: ry, add attachments or reference Supporting occurring; (c) durationls. Ensure ; (d) Impacts have been identified and adequatelyaaddre addressed. that ❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/Or prepare a ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based On Potentially information r significant adverse impacts which MAY documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any declaration. AND provide on attachments as d acts ar , and analysis above and any al Y the reasons Supportingy significant adverse environmental impacts this determination: Pacts Nemc or Lced Agency Yn^r m lype Nem"of NesPun,,ble Ut icer m Lead Agrncy rN a or NeePons�ble Urticer bgnature Of NesPonable O(1¢er m Lea d Agency S�gn�yrrq L oil' t Jnlerent vom re+pomDle onmer Date 2 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for �A4astafdxr) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in Planning Board, and represents and states as follows:accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . . Minor Subdivision for Petrol Stations .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . .. . . ....... ... I. . . . . .. .LwinitpA. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. ..... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. .... ......... .... . . .. . . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber 10226. . .. .. .. ... . .. . . .. .. . . Page 289 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On January 21, 1987 Liber . .. .. .. .... .. ........... Page . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . .. .. .. Liber . . . .. .. .. .. .. ...... . . .. . Page Liber . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .... . . . Page . . . . . . .. . On Liber . ... . .. .... .. .... ...... . Page O , as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. oras distributee . .. . . .. .. .. .. .... .. ... .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ....... . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. .. . .... . . . . . ... . . . 5. The area of the land is . .. . 5.836 • •. . . .. .. . acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . I . . ... . . . . .. . . .. . . . 7. The land is encumbered by mortgage (s) as follows: (a) \InrtI ge recorded in Liber . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Page " ' • • • . . . . . • . . . .. . . in original amount Of $,175,000;00 , unpaid amount $ The . . . . . . held by . . . .. . . . .North.. . . . .Fork Bank. . . & Trust. C,q... . . . . address 2.45.Lpv.e.Lape,. Mat tltyGk,, New. York (b) 1lortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . in original amount Of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . unpaid amount $. . . . . held by . . . .. .. .. .. . . . address . . . . ...... . . . . . . .. 8 .1. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... .. .. .. APR 19 0 (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . .. . . . . . . .. . Page in original amount of unpaid amount $. . . ... . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . held by . .. .. .... .. . . .. ... . . .. . ...... .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . address . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land xomRk , . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .... ...... .. . . . ... 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts . .[i„Resident ial/AgriculLural.. . ... and B-1 General Business . . . .. . . . 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise�x xx XXAkx. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. ... . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (ttkRKX (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis. trict, if within a District, is . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . 13. Water mains will be laid by . , , and (a) . . .. .. . . . . . . (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14• Electric lines and standards will be installed by , ,,n/a . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. lines. and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said 15. Gas mains will be installed by , ,, , n a and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed Uv the appli Suffolk County IIicant to be existin ghway sy'stcnt, annex Schedule "L"' public streets in the hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing Town of Southold f"ghwav system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to shote same. Public streets in the 18. There arc no existinti buildings or structures otile la e ud Which are not located and shown Oil the plat. n 19. Where the plat shotas proposed streets which are extcnsious of streets on adjoinin <ln']sion maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said rststin1" maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. said 20. In the course of these proccediugs, tite applic;uiC 335 of the Real Proptrill oiler proof of title its required Uy Sec. 21. Sill),111t a copy of proposed deed for lots shotvin;�_all restrictions, cotenants, Schedule "D" . .-. 8 !.. etc. :\nnex 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $• •• •• .. .. . as itemized in Schedule "B" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at .. . .. .. .. .. . . . years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE February 28t 19 90 PETROL . . . STAT S I ITE . .. .. . . . .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. ... ... .. . ... . . . (Name of p ' nt y . . . ( na d Title) f, KEVIN M AUGHLIN, As At rney and Agent 828 F nt Streetr ) O Bo..x .8.. ..03 ...... . . . .. . + (Address) Greenport, New York 11944 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . .. . . . On the . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . day 119. .. .. .. .. . . .. . .... . .. . . . . .. . . . 19. . . . . .. before me personally came " ' • •• • • • • •• •• •• •• •• . . . . . to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . . . . . . . .. .. ., executed the same. Notary Public. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . . ..$Uffo.Zk. . . . .. . . .. .. .. . ss: On the . .. . .?4h• . . . .. . dayo{ Februar " "' • "" " " ' • � • •Y. • •. 19. •9 Q ., before me personally came J. Kevin McLaughlin. . . . . . • . . . , , .. . to me known, who being by me duly- sworn did de- pose and say that . . . .. .. .. .. . resides at No. . .¢80 .41 d .orchard. Lane�..>~ast. ktarxon,,NY• • .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . that . .. . . . . . .h?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . is the Attoxney. and ,Agent of . . . ..?etro]•$tat?pn� .��.mitcd . . . . . . . the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that. .. .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . knows the s"L of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors Of Said corporation. au;d that he. . . . . . , signed his .. . name thereto by like order. . iQotaryPubli . . . . . . . . 5:Lk,�� VA COM 3q A�1 P U- NI G BQ9 D TO�ttr q I O sou ;HOLD Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOURAPPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer- to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence. 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? XKAU No (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? U No 3 . Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? SRX No 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency? (Town , State, County, etc. ) XZW No 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? XTW No 6. Was this property the subject of an application to the Planning Board? Previously prior dYs sketch plan approval for this minor subdivision which has expired. VdCX 7. Does this property have a valid certificate Of occupancy, if yes please submit .a copy of same Yes I certify t s atements are true and on by e _ 1 i Bo r will be relied n considering this application. e 2/28/90 ign e p p wner or authorized agent date J. IN MCLAUGHLIN, A T EY AND AGENT i Attachment to questionnaire for, the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss : On the 28th day Of February 1990, before me personally came J. Kevin McLaughlin to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. -- ll Oar v n ICS -- M � `11 STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ss: J. Kevin McLaughlin, being duly sworn, deposes and says : That I am the attorney-agent for Petrol Stations, Ltd. regarding its application for a three lot minor sub-division concerning property bearing Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-109 . 00- 01. 00-023. 000 . That I am fully familiar with the books and records of said corporation and that based thereon the following are the only Persons with an ownership interest in said corporation. Thomas J. Gorman - Shareholder, President and Director Thomas J. Gorman, Jr. - Shareholder and Director That no other person or entity has any interest in Petrol Stations, Ltd. as a shareholder, officer or director. J n cL u i Sworn to before me this 5th day of March, 1990 otary Public LINO A M. Ywk TONV68 "r =aaNc Cou�pwr %mole' 001"309M. Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Petrol Stations Ltd. Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours tru iC J N McLA GH s Attorney a d Agent for/PH or P ROL TATIONS LIMITED i 8_ IIM.ndnrd.N'.Y.RTA% 1'unn aOI 531—};zecutor'a Dead—lnliv{duul or Corporation. • ll// ll CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT-THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYER ONLY. 1 1226 iTHIS INDEMIURE, made the 24th day of November nineteen hundred and Eighty-Six BETWEEN 2SJ4S JANE MARIE MORRIS, residing at R.D. 112, Box 29, Route 145, Middleburgh, New York 12122, and AMY KING, residing at 814 H Court Street, Keene, New Hampshire 03431, cq- as/executor s of the last will and testament of JOSEPHINE T. ROWLAND late of Suffolk County who died on the 3rd day of March nineteen hundred and eighty-six party of the first part, and PETROL STATIONS LIMITED, a New York Corporation with principal place of business at (No 11) Love Lane, Mattituck, New York 11952, party of the second part, WITNESSETH,that the party of the first part, to whom letters testamentary were issued by the Surrogate's Court, Suffolk County, New Yorl: \ t on December 18, 1986 and by virtue of the power and authority given in and by said last will l,• ! ti� and testament, and/or by Article 11 of the Estates, Powers and Trusts Law, and in consideration of TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100----------------($285,000.00)---------------dollars, paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and "j release unto the party of the second part, the distributees or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, `\ \. ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, ' lying and being:bxAw at Cutchogue, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Main Road (NYS Route 25) distant westerly 264.57 feet from the corner formed by the intersection of the northerly side of Main Road and the westerly side of Alvah's Lane; running THENCE along the northerly side of Main Road, South 560 00' 00" West 150.30 feet to land of John Haurus; THENCE along said land and along land now or formerly of Ruth Coyne, formerly Haff, North 440 48' 40" West 332.45 feet; THENCE still along land now or formerly of Ruth Coyne and along land of Sidney Beebe, formerly Edward Haff, South 56° 56' 30" West 321.31 feet to land of Milton Meltzer; TAX MAP THENCE along said land North 45° 17' 00" West 45.51 feet to land of DESIGNATION Middle Main Associates, formerly Andrew Dickey; Dt. 1000 THENCE along said land North 43° 08' 30" West 352.17 feet to land of Paul Kalowski; Seo 109.00 THENCE along said land North 50° 04' 00" East 360.89 feet to land of Eugenia Kapusta; BIL. 01.00 THENCE along said land North 47° 21' 50" East 117.06 feet to land of Alexander Zelinski; THENCE along said land and along land of Margaret McCaffery, Thomas L°'I'IJ23.000 McCaffery, Cyril McCaffery and Agnes Kuhlman, formerly L. B. Horton, South 430 03' 00" East 788.86 feet to the northerly side of Main Road, at the point or place ``911`s7 of BEGINNING. `_ BEING and intended to be the same premises of which Josephine T. Rowland / died seized and possessed, a resident of Suffolk County, New York on 3/3/86. 7 `,w� ;.� 4y REAL ESTATE JAN21' 1987 TRANSFER TAX SUFFOLK COUNTY • s 10226 K250 TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof, TOGETHER with the appurtenances, and also all the estate which the said decedent had at the time of decedent's death in said premises, and also the estate therein, which the party of the first part has or has power to convey or dispose of, whether individually, or by virtue of said will or otherwise, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the distributees or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been incumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part,in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN t'RF.SENCE OF: LL LL � JANE MARIE MORRIS �� 6 19K114 STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF SCHOHARIE NEW HAMPSHIRE as: STATE OPmNIlNI]�p� COSY OF as, On the- .Zmy day of NoJC'�ber 1986 , before me On the077 personally came "1 7 �y of co N 19��t-. before me personally came JFNE MARIE MORRIS AMY KING to me known to be the individual described in and who to me (mown to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and aclmowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, she executed the same. and acknowledged thatshe executed the same. Notary ub � 1 �� 't Notary Pu fhic WANDA J- KIND - Nptpry RJh!ic, Stpte 01 tdow Ynrk ^ rrh^h@rin GigUn STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF asF STATE OF NEW YO On the day of 19 RK, COUNTY of before me personally came perOn the day of 19 before me to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and he subscallyribing came �o the aubscribi witness to the foregoing instrument, with say that he resides at No. whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly that he is the sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. Of that he knows the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he to be the individual knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- execute the same; and that he, said witness, tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. RL�ecutor$ 3�leeD SECTION TrTLE No. 605-S-3021 BLOCK ------ -- Lor JANE MARIE MORRIS & AMY KING, as co- COUNTY OR TOWN Executrices under the LW&T of TAX Rr LLTNG ADDRESS JOSEPHINE R. ROW WD PI,(IT. STATIONS LIMITED Recorded At Reauest of The Title Guarantee Company RETURN BY MAIL'TO: STANDARD FORS OF MSW YORK BOARD OF mu UNDERWRITERS by WILLIAM H. PRICE, ESQ. TITLE GUARANTEE- 828 Front Street NEWYORK Greenport, New York 11944 ATICOR COMPANY Zip No. --------------- a4 ILI fit —L I fill p I �e ti VIII i!i'i i i � IaIeI:L•i bff{� "+ i i i i I I I ��Yv_ ti• _ _ a �=♦ !o ..iiia" it nl{YL laC � _ nQ snWaa .4•' '• ` W '�� 6y 1 li •� S ice, ��'� . �y � 4 O v Y•S n •,,, sx •'p ° a �. ' ,a' 0" �''�; boa a 4 n`OyNbW • •"b • O ♦• � ",4• y •b + b OMVI A .. •Z! etll• • F4WWYY tF ;• OF ri. L _C• •b- •! _ /+ '• L 4rp2 �?. nn0 • /.' "� 2 �: ��: �Fk .A t. ! et. If 1, y! } ~m^ d i ; cn I C4 's• � k ok yC• LP Qln. �•�rt. m in ee '6 iiQ ! LIN ` o S \$ i I 1 4 i III � 2 Iv ^ I $e r a J Snw GT ... y'•� x p ,Ota �� I I LIIE )Ili k• ���/// •o; 1 n • �• �\� ! / bi l� �I�I �P o �o�R •b«� d• _ I + _f •• 9 i t Oa ,. la _ �T �a X .ONVt •Rf ryX;: III i ^ N- O "• _ RIP W4 0 21 .�� _ J <.i3 f • �� • Iy P �Ei i ' _ Qj7 FgIflWdY ,p ' .. C15 '3 q. sE#T. #1 _ •SL �- � �P•�e '�- I •• �/' �� it •n o� ' n III n 111 I' I � \ \\ 5F n �t � ✓w pdd W I,I f \ O 9[S e[[.w.in Z• II, T—4 THI. MAJOR SUBo' 1SION IS FOR LOTS ON5_-_F36At IS LOCATED ON 4 _ IN C��^A' ' _ i SCT1%I# 1000- tog _ 1_�3 ?_ MAJOR SUBDI-c MON k 4 LOTS WITH ROAD) Complete application received ¢- 18" 1�ro Application reviewed at work session Irot oK +m t OK "ro. Applicant advised of necessary revisions _ Revised submission received A-7 OK Sketch plan approval -with conditions 101v 141 (&'6'j Skein Lead Agency Coordination zizu�g2- s7�"d �h c" ' y(bI«# SEQRA determination Ma (aL Road profiles/drainage submitted I 9z !R oK 1rS3 30 t -revisions "„• oK Road profiles/drainage reviewed be Engineer s a s qZ- t2i 07K "ro.� EO KE f Bond estimate submitted Bond adopted by PB Bond adopted by TB Payment of bond Payment of inspection fee WE Sent to County Planning Commission s 9 L n oK Receipt of County Report �z L Iro`. OK Review of SCPC report Sent to Fire Commissioner lo- zz- 91 Receipt of firewell location it - q - 11 Notification to applicant to include on final map No w.e.QQ Y-e rec /0D L OK Draft Covenants and Restrictions received 'n AW Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received jy? CtoSacO W�tR. (0 1 aINIl L r..JPfw- '77""w• AAS, Receipt tit myl�rs and paper prints with h I Health approval �11 � �„3fu Final Public Hearing tAV Approval of subdivision -with conditions Endorsement of subdivision BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter or the Petition of PETROL STATIONS LTD. NOTICE to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold TO ADJACENT TO: PROPERTY OWNER PAUL TONY KALOWSKI CUTCHOGUE FARMS, LTD. BARBARA HAURUS ANNA BARISIC JOHN HAURUS SIDNEY BEEBE AGNES KUHLMAN JONAS HIGBEE, JR. WADE DAVEY n ' YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: ALOEXRZELINSKI �T V` 6 lQrj 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of A q/ to request a (Variance) ($pfd{ytyg}fIeirpcleochoice � / 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows; Tax Map No 1000-109-01-23 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the fo artiall in the RO Zone Lot 4 and artiall in R40 Zlloneowingzoning district: Lots 1-3 4 lhat bN surh Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: an area variance for Lot 4 which lot does not contain the Minimilm 5. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signed are Article VII Section t nn-72. [ ] Section 280-A, New York Town Law for approval of access over rights)-of-way. 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 7d5-1809. 7. rhat before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hrvrinr in the Srtffnik Times anrt in the Lone kland Traveler-M.,ttitty$ %Vi!chr.,n, newcn�nerc n�ihli<h�a ;,, rhe Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that right to appear and be heard at such hearing. you or your representative have the Dated: . August 10 1990 rttaner 0 ners ' NameslP rol Stations, Ltd. Post ffice Address - J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esq. 828 Front Street, Po Box 803 eeTenpor 6 ,) 477-1016 - Z51 [Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal to be attached for convenience Purposes . ] • O a�a� N 1 annn y 10� Zn O •m n rrrr OOoO 'N O W 4z)ha L i i � O 4 (n� q i OJ U p p H .y y m SCO W � O L/NOfN lJ. AK d� Ny�co �d9 0 o ip oCo'w� A a ocp p OZN Pr* 0900 �' `6 �O T 20 AlloSg'4 0�9s`� �, pGI �\ f �d � v e'0 0'1. ee`'2 s o w 2 vp 92a d o �,31 d� oil' 5P }V. O O� 'O.46 0 . -Of�pti m. CO. Ir Of 70 _S ~TOS, T;artl �o Q p ` (0Q, m � n 1Tl 4 p C.) y � � SAT LA SIMMG)BOARD DATTORNEY AT LA828 FRONT STREET, P.O.BOX 803 GREENPORT,NY 11944 N (516)477.1016 September 19 , 1988 Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall Southold, NY i1971 Re: Application for Special Exception-Cutchogue Farms Ltd. SCTM #1000-109-1-13 Gentlemen: Please be advised that I represent Petrol Stations Limited which owns property (SCTM 1000-109-1-23) adjoining the applicant' s property. I have enclosed a copy of my client' s letter previously forwarded to you objecting to this application. Please keep me advised of any and all hearings or conferences scheduled in this matter. Very �ul s , J evin McLa hl n JKM/lmt Enclosure CC : Southold Town Planning Board " Thomas Gorman Coyne f11. $6 •_ 1 0 o E €< NOV 6 C'-5e a this survey Burp rmt boar;;3 40.0 s d.:.rens Surveyae*frr ed su{r% er7lio:-,W saai shaft rat be emaideru* m�e a vaiw VA CWI. 1 fi�a nbas haaered hereon Vas: r,i ! in i",va:ed,and an Me b5he"to: . tCl.c:::cCnrry,aa§mnm. r f r i .habon IiVod h;mca Y :the Q3:.; :-da Of:ha!.=dial i.. t ore n Qd.:i.:�i at tronas:, :ie L :4za trrriwtions or aLbsqwr. z <If lift* - s 'yj,> 5 vv MAG OF PP-OPERTY f r- U r a . hO' i SURVEYED FOP. 1 + ''ne JOHN H. 13AREARA M. HAUR.US O AT f `t IT, CUTCHOGUE ' �6F NEW l 3 vf � rY- VA Otir`, TOwN of 40IJTHOLD, N.Y. ci ry z 1S2bb -1 1 -v i b I Gudrontesd to Security TiTle btt4r4nt Rp +� Go. and t1a SOutkOW SOVinp bank 64.13 _ a5 surveyed May 17, f967. S.`S6. �Q•t7 ° 4rs t VAN ,TrUYL r SON 00 rV Alv°hs done MAIN Licerrsed La d Surveyors i DAD Greea�iofr{, N. Y. i I i 828 FRONT STREET,P.O.BOX 803 GREENPORT,NY 11944 (516)477-1016 Mal ch 5 , 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 re: Minor Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations, Ltd. Tax Map No. 1000-109 . 00-01. 00-023 . 000 Gentlemen: I have enclosed the necessary documentation in the above- referenced matter. This proposed minor sub-division previcusly received sketch plan approval, but for various reasons , the approval was allowed to lapse. I also believe that the property has been the subject of a site plan approval fol the architects office located on proposed Lot #3 . Ve r t ly y , i J/ q in JKM/b1 enclosure FxPR 18 tcfc FD(,(-C PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �f1�� �.. O�� Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 September 15, 1992 Michael E. Gorman Petrol Stations Ltd. Love Lane 6 i9gZ , Mattituck, NY 11952 M RE: Subdivision Application for'ry ` -4! Petrol Stations Ltd. North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, September 14, 1992: The preliminary public hearing, which was held at 7: 40 P.M. was closed. It was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant preliminary approval on the subdivision map dated January 16, 1992, and the Grading and Drainage plan dated July 12, 1992, with the following conditions of approval: 1• All structures located on proposed Lot Number 4 must be accurately located and labeled. 2. A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be submitted containing the following: A. Upon completion of the proposed road, the existing access to the buildings located on proposed Lot Number 4 is to be eliminated. Access to this lot is to be from the proposed road only. B. The vegetated buffer area shown on the subdivision map for Petrol Stations Ltd. , is to remain undisturbed. Maintenance of the natural vegetation (removal of dead or diseased plants) shall be the only activity allowed in the area. Petrol Stations Lt - ,September 15, 199 Page 2 Failure to submit the final submission within six ( 6) months of the date of conditional preliminary approval shall automatically cancel the conditional preliminary- approval, unless a request for an extension of time is requested, and granted by the Planning Board. The final submission must contain the following: 1. Final subdivision maps revised in accordance with the conditions of preliminary approval and containing a valid stamp of Health Department approval (Six ( 6) paper copies will be required as part' of the final submission. Two ( 2) mylars with a valid stamp of Health Department approval will be required prior to any endorsement of the subdivision. ) 2. A draft of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions upon review of the final maps. 3 . A Homeowner's Association must be filed for the road area. A draft of the document must be submitted to the Planning Board for reivew prior to filing. Documentation that the Homeowner' s Association has been recorded must be submitted prior to endorsement of the map by the Chairman. 4. A draft bond estimate for all subdivision improvements. The draft will be reviewed by the Planning Board and the Engineering Inspector. 5. Curb cut approval from the New York State Department of Transportation if such is required for the proposed improvements at the intersection with N.Y. S. Rte. 25. The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that the subject property does not contain adequate land to fulfill the park and recreation requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. Therefore, a payment of $2, 000. 00 per vacant lot will be required in lieu of land reservation. The final hearing will not be scheduled until items numbered 1 - 5 above are submitted and are accepted by the Planning Board. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - 001 ,r:.. N F 7� •r PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y F"" '. �.�- Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS O.� �Z.;x. �� George Ritchie Latham. Jr. - j .yam Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald a M �1 Town Hall, 53095 P.O. Box 1 Main Road `z 179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold. New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 18, 1992 Michael E. Gorman Petrol Stations Ltd. Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision Petrol Stations SCTM#1000-109-1-23 - Dear Mr. Gorman: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 17, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED the adopt the Engineering Inspector' s Report dated August 10, 1992. Please note that a firewell is not required for this. subdivision. Street trees will be required as per the specifications in the code. The exact location will be determined at the time of road construction in order to take into consideration any existing trees. It is not necessary to indicate the trees on the map as the number required by code will be included in the bond. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, September 14, 1992 at 7:40 P.M. for a preliminary public hearing on the maps dated January 16, 1992. Very truly yours, / Bennett b nevtt Orlowski, Jr: �s Chairman Q��S�fFOlkco� �\ mow -c m s RAYMOND L. JACOBS LnT SUPERINTENDENT OF 0 • A JAMES A. RICHTER HIGHWAYS ENGINEERING �rOl � !' INSPECTOR 765-3140 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER 765-3070 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AUGUST 10, 1992 BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK . 11971 RE: PETROL STATIONS LTD. (MINOR) MAIN ROAD - CUTCHOGUE SCTM N 1000 - 109 - O1 - 23 DEAR MR. ORLOWSKI : AS PER YOUR REQUEST, I HAVE REVIEWED THE PLAN AND PROFILE DATED 01/14/92 FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED MINOR SUBDIVISION. THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED ARE ADEQUATE AND THE TYPICAL ROAD CROSS SECTION MEETS THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT HIGHWAY SPECIFICATIONS. THE ENTRANCE PLAN AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING APPEARS TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARD STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW CURB CUTS. THIS DRAWING MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE STATE FOR ANY CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS THEY MAY WISH TO INCLUDE IN THIS PROJECT. IT IS ALSO NECESSARY TO OBTAIN A STATE CURB CUT PERMIT BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION STARTS. OTHER ITEMS, SUCH AS FIRE WELLS AND STREET TREES SHOULD BE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AS DIRECTED BY THE PLANNING BOARD. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS REVIEW, PLEASE CONTACT MY OFFICE. N ERELWIT �AMES A. .A. CC: RAYMOND L. JACOBS D (SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS ) FILE AUG 101992 SOUTHOLDTOWN PLANNING BOARD Ftcr /tj 5 GORMAN - PETROL Service Stations GROUP Love Lane, Mattituck,N.Y. 11952 5 16-298-8478 July 22, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM: 1000-109-1-23 Dear Chairman Orlowski, Enclosed are eight (8) copies of the Plan and Profile 25' Right of Way map for the above minor subdivision. We believe that this new map complies with your latest revision request, that is: 1. The Road Cross Section has been changed to reflect your requirements of a 4" compacted thickness Sub Base of Stone Blend or Crushed Concrete, 2111 thick Asphalt Binder and a 11" thick Asphalt Wearing Surface. 2. A more accurate topographic survey has been done to assist you in the review of the design and requirements for fill and grading of the access road, and especially the proposed cul-de-sac, due to the slope of the terrain in the area. 3. The Drainage Calculations have been recalculated using a runoff coefficient of. 1.0. Very truly yours, PETROL STATIONS LTD. Michael E. Gorman cc: J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esquire 23 '`92 � S i aoy�,U `f CSG PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS t G 3 SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Gcorce Ritchie Latham, Jr. P Supervisor Richard G. Ward 1�l ¢ Aad Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 7, 1992 Michael E. Gorman Petrol Stations Ltd. Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on April 6, 1992: Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, assumes lead agency, and as lead agency, flakes a determination of non-signifance, and grant a Negative Declaration. The site does not have significant environmental constraints, nor are any significant environmental impacts anticipated as a result of the proposed project. The Planning Board is requiring that a road, built to Town Specifications be constructed for this project. The Planning Board requests a more accurate topographic survey in order to assist in the review of the design and requirements for fill and grading of the road, and especially the proposed cul-de-sac, due to the slope of the terrain in the area. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Encl. Chairman o C:sAnu cm I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS W SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ?'_'�i.; - Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward r �W3 Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa. Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significante April 6, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning:Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Subdivision for Petrol Stations, Ltd. SCTM#: 1000-109-1-23 Location: North side Main Road, Cutchogue SEQR Status : Type I ( ) Unlisted ( X) Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X ) Description of Action: This major subdivision is for 4 lots on 5. 836 acres located on the north side of Main Road; 264 feet west of Alvah's Lane in Cutchogue. 41( Page 2 Petrol Stations, Ltd. SEQR Negative Declaration Con' t. Reason Supporting This Determination: An environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The proposed project conforms to existing zoning in terms of density, providing lots with an average sizeof well over one acre. A buffer area has been placed on Lot 4 to separate the commercial use area from residential uses to the north. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time; it is assumed that there are no' comments or objections from that agency. Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: ( 516) 765-1938 CC: Robert DeLuca, Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Thomas Jorling, DEC Albany ' Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant CRAMER, V �111 RHIt "r 'SOCIATES - ENVIRONMENT ,� \� �G CONSULTANTS April 2, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road (' � 1.4 P.O. Box 1179 a p i Southold, NY 11971 Re: Review of EAF Petrol Stations, Ltd. SouTHOUrTGN'N SCTM No. 1000-109-1-23 PLANNING BOARD Dear Benny: As per the your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with your correspondence of February 25, 1992. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Environmental and Planning Considerations The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The project involves the proposed subdivision of a 5.835 acre parcel of land into four (4) lots with areas of 1.965 acres, 1.792, 0.980, 1.098 acres. The site is located on the north side of Main Road, beginning 264.57 feet west of Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue, New York. The project is an unlisted action, and a Long EAF has been submitted for review and coordination purposes. The subject site is located in an area where the frontage of the property along Main Road is zoned "RO" (Residential/Office), to a depth of 200 feet. The balance of the site is zoned R-40, allowing residential dwellings based on a yield of 40,000 square foot lots. The areas north of the site are zoned "A-C" (Agricultural Conservation) district allowing use on 80,000+ square foot lots -- this land is primarily vacant and/or agricultural land. The adjoining lots to the east are homes fronting on Alvah's Lane, within the "R-40" zoning district. The site has existing improvements in the area identified as Lot 4 on the subdivision map. This portion of the site includes a 2-story frame house, currently used as a real estate appraisers office, and a barn building currently used as an architects office. There is a parking area for the office uses, and several small outbuildings in this Firstof the site. Lot 4 includes landscape vegetation in and around buildings, with first growth woods on the rear portion of the site. Lots 1, 2 and 3, are vegetated in Pagel ot3 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Petrol Stations,Ltd. Review of Long EAF first growth woods, and openings in the locust, maple and cherry canopy have permitted thick undergrowth of vines which makes access throughout the site difficult. The front portion of the site (Lot 4) is predominantly flat with no topographic swales, or depressions present. The topography drops in the rear of the parcel from southeast to northwest. In this area there is an elongated depression which is part of a subtle north-south running swale. There is no evidence that this swale receives a significant amount of area runoff, nor is there any indication of accumulation of water which would change soil character or cause wetlands indicator species to exist. The Suffolk County Soil Survey indicates three soil types on site including, Haven loam near the road, with Riverhead Sandy loam, in the center of the rear part of the site, and Plymouth loamy sand in the northwest portion of the parcel. Haven loam is considered to be prime farmland; however, none of these soils pose a significant constraint to residential use. There is an unclassified intermittent stream shown running through the area of the depression reflected on the survey. The depth to groundwater beneath the site is 8 feet beneath the depression and 18 feet in the area near Main Road. This depth is expected to provide adequate leaching depth for sanitary system installation; however further review will be necessary by the Health Department. There were no significant habitats or threatened, endangered or special concern species observed on site during field inspections. There are no wetlands within or bordering the subject site. The parcel is surrounded by residential and vacant land use to the north, and residential and neighborhood business to the south. The proposed project conforms to existing zoning in terms of density, providing lots with an average size of well over one acre. Although Lot 3 is less than 1 acre it is noted that it is greater than 40,000 square feet, and the remaining lots are substantially oversized. It is noted that access to lots 1, 2 and 3 is from a 25 foot right- of-way on the west side of the parcel. The area of this right-of-way is included in the individual lot areas; therefore, the access will be by easement over Lot 4 (and others). If access is provided as driveways within this right-of-way, which branch off a common drive, no significant environmental impact is expected. If an improved road is constructed including a cul-de-sac and drainage, additional consideration should be liven to design, fill, and limits of clearing due to the slope of the terrain in the area identified as cul-de-sac on the subdivision map. A more detailed indication of the type of driveway proposed is necessary for complete evaluation. The proposed project requires clarification regarding conformance to Suffolk County Department of Health Services density criteria for sanitary systems. Althou&h the overall density appears to conform to the minimum 40,000 square foot lots size reqired in this Groundwater Management Zone VI, there are two uses on proposed Lotu1. Lot 1 is 1.098 acres, providing an allowable flow of 358 gallons per day. The dwelling contributes 300 gallons per day, allowing only an additional 58 gallons per day for the real estate office and the architects office. The additional commercial flow would cause this lot to exceed the maximum allowable flow; however, the average density is well below the 300 gallons per acre per day limit. From an environmental standpoint, we do not believe that the proposed subdivision would cause excessive nitrogen loading, and we feel that the density is in general /112__�=\\\ AM CRAMER, VOORHIS, &'ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAfD,PhBNNI`JG CONSULTANTS Page 2of3 V// Petrol Stations,Ltd. Review of Long EAF conformance to the recommendations of the 208 Study and the intent of Article 6. From a regulatory standpoint, SCDHS will provide the final evaluation under County subdivision review procedures. The site is within the Water Budget area, however, excessive groundwater impacts are not expected. The project is not within an area served by public water therefore, private water supply wells will be used for on-site water supply. The area is not in an area identified as being affected by aldicarb contamination in the North Fork Water Supply Study; however, the area may be or may have been affected by nitrate contamination. Supply well sampling must be performed to the satisfaction of the SCDHS, and potable water supply must be provided in accord with Article IV of the Sanitary Code. Subdivision approval as well as individual lot approval from SCDHS will be required for water supply and sanitary disposal. 4. Conclusion and Recommendations Based upon the review of the Long EAF Parts I and II, site inspection and documentation noted above, we feel that the site does not have significant environmental constraints, nor is any significant environmental impact anticipated as a result of the proposed project. We do feel that if a subdivision road with a cul-de- sac is to be installed, additional information concerning the design, fill/grading, and limits of clearing should be considered as compared to a more accurate topographic survey prior to issuing a decision on the project. We are in agreement that the proposed buffer area on Lot 4 is benefical in separating the commercial use area from residential uses to the north. In addition, covenants or other appropriate method should be utilized to ensure that the building envelop on Lot 1 avoids the depression area as shown on the subdivision map. If the Planning Board is in agreement, we feel that the Planning Board could appropriately issue a Negative Declaration, not requiring the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement, based upon the reasons noted above. I hope this letter provides the Board with the information needed to continue review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. VeryC-dy arles J. Voorhis, CEP,AICP enc: Part 1/II LEAF \�\ A�'� CRAMER, VOORHIS &ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAt�AND 'RLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 3of3 �— VIA/ wM 1416-2 (2/87)-7c 617.21 SEOR Appendix A State Environmental Duality Review FULL ENVIPONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FO , (a Q iJ 17 Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an o manner, whether a.pro�j ct or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not ys'easy to answer. Frequ' nt- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also unde that those who det6mh ne significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be to nic Ily expert in enviro me al analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware f th gliggq ps a feet ng the question of significance. PLANNING BOARD The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can I3-e—assuretl that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: X Part 1 ;K Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important im I Pint t a a e si If t impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be p A " � � A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actio " 1I AI 1 .. .I =III N ✓ ,- ons L o(. so;,.- f Name of Action I'I '1j t o_A-CA Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer CSignature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 ' ART 1—PROJECT INF0k.IAT JN Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Subdivision for Petrol Stations LTD. LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Main Road, Cutchogue, Suffolk County, New York NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Petrol Stations LTD. (516 ) 298-8478 ADDRESS Love Lane, P.O. Box 1445 CITY/Po STATE ZIP CODE Mattituck NY 111952 NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ) ADDRESS CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The- rv0po,.eU 5"12el- i disioiv pr- ✓� �35acirs i•�ro on-S . SG t M No Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ■Commercial JOResldentlal (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest,. ❑Agriculture ■Other Vacant 2. Total acreage of project area: 5.835 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres ,forested acres 3 .05 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces �C �� acres —_Flo$ acres Other (Indicate type) Lawn acres Ili' 1 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? 1uPh kxtm {2(Ve�-�eaCtS4f.SDy IoOtm,+ PILI a. Soil drainage: ■Well drained 92 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site ■Poorly drained 8 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes •■No a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) I OQ m lq will 2 Lf S. Approximate percentage of prop pr((-t site with slopes: NO-10% 10 010-15% % 1115% or 6 ter °,5 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Dyes ONO 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes I*No 8. What is the depth of the water table?10f2E]F (in feet) 5 M4 8 f-0 /8 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes ®No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes ENO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes ■No According to 120ne' GLGG024p//Iq 2!p G PA -j /TE Identify each species //V VE9 r.1 C7.4 7714>IJ 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes !No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes =No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes ■No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: //fie a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name 1*7 D/7e- b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ■Yes ONO a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ■Yes ONO b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Eyes ONO 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes GNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes ■No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes NNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project,(fill in dimensions as appropriate !>�� a."Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor —!I,,,acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 5.6 acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0.2 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ----- (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed 0 %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ----- proposed ----- g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ----- (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: Residential/Office One Family Two Family Condominium Initially 1 Ultimately 3 1 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 150 It, 3 2. Kow much natural maX . (i.� k, earth, etc.) will be removed ( _m (4ite? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Ayes ONo ■N/A I 1 a. If yes, for what intend_ purpose is the site being reclaimed? _La haGce -f I n5 MGv-Teyicds b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? XYes ONo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ))Yes ONo 4. low many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? - ----- acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 1b0 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes ■No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 ----- month ----- year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase ----- month ---- year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes ■No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ----- ; after project is complete ----- 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ----- 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes RNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ANo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Eyes ONo Type Single Family Septic System , 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ®No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain?? OYes RNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? �6es ■No 3M )t a. If yes, what is the amount per month 019 tons b. If yes, will an existin solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ONo n / ' c. If yes, give name 2ANOG L:G/LL ; location A1OZ7WRd, lcAoo9uc d. Will any wastes not-go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Ayes ■No � e. If Yes, explain /LL /j"P9L<, 'Iy�t�? 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes ■No S. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? - Dyes 0No 19. Will projectroutinely produce odors (more. than one hour per day)? Dyes ■No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 'Oyes ■No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Eyes ONo If yes , indicate type(s) Electric, Fuel, Single Family Residence 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallons/day. r 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes ■No If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes I§No City, Town, Village Planning Board Eyes ❑No Subdivision Approval City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes MNo City, County Health Department MYes ❑No Sanitary & Drinking Water Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ■No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ■No State Agencies ❑Yes ■No Federal Agencies Dyes ■No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Eyes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit !subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? RO and R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?, One Residential Office and three Single Family Lots w Rrh Zo/ /oToccup, Z/z Sro'-'- 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ----- 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? ------------ C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Byes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classificationss,within a '/ mile radius of proposed action? Residential Offices 'f'colb t and Agricultural RO & A-C) 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? Eyes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 0.98 acre 4 2- 1 (y 99. 9 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes ■No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Dyes ■No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes ■No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification certify that the informs ' n provi -d above is true .to the best of my knowledg . Applicant/Sponso e C /LUC_ T-'� TI��S ` �_ Date Signature [ /Z- Title If the action is in the Coa to Area, and ou arc a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Par`'/ —PROJECT IMPACTS AND Tl� -9 ""IAGNITUDE �. Responsibility of Lead Agency \• General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1fEl 3 Small to Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND ModerateMitigated By 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ImpactProject Change Examples that would apply to column 2 � O DYES • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed Dyes ❑No 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑3 feet. ❑Yes ❑No • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. C7 • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ 13 Yes ❑No ❑ 3 feet of existing ground surface. Dyes []No • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ than one phase or stage. ❑Yes ❑No • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. ❑Yes ❑No • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ • Construction in a designated floodway. 1:1 Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No El• Other impacts ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect tr. _..,y ur:,que or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)YNO DYES • Specific land forms: ❑ Cl Oyes ❑No 6 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conserva on Law, ECL) Impact Impact Project Change 81N0 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ '❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes [:]No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? 39,N0 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ F-1 Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? RANO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not 11 ❑ []Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ E]Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyeJ off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likelv cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: y ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or Patten , or surface water runoff? NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 7 \ 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ Cl C1 Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? )<NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ [3 Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ EJ Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? XNO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? �NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land re,,s9urces? ®NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 /` • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No C land (includes cropland, hayfields; pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 i 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? N Appendix B.) O DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether 1:1 Dyes ❑No man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their ❑ ❑Yes ❑No enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? 10 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register Dyes ❑No of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ project site. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity.DYES ❑ • A major reduction of an open Space important to the community. El El ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 F IMPACT ONIANSPORT 1 2 3 TION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 1 14. Will there be an effect to existing transpofletlotlyystems? Moderate Large Mitigated By XNO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • • Alteration of present patterns of movement of ped()le and/or goods. ❑ ,❑ ❑Yes ❑No • • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problciO ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sour of fuel or energy supply? NO NO Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibraClop as a result of the Proposed Action? - ®NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ' • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe y Examples that would apply to column 2 NO DYES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of 13 Yes ❑No accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. •• Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ E)Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous Dyes ❑NO waste. [ L Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 2 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the exist iinVommunity? Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 XNO DYES • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services Cl ❑ ❑Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Cl ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? `ZNO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Des`cribe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) . it � FO(,��OG RAYMOND L. JACOBS N Z SUPERINTENDENT OF JAMES A. RICHTER HIGHWAYS ENGINEERING �1f'01 x ra�� INSPECTOR 765-3140 '! 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FEBRUARY 20, 1992 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Re: PETROL STATIONS LTD. (MINOR SUBDIVISION) RTE. 25 - CUTCHOGUE SCTM # 1000 - 109 - 01 - 23 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, I have reviewed the preliminary Plans that were submitted for the above referenced subdivision. The following is a list of my comments: 1. A State Curb Cut Permit is required. 2. The Town Specification gives a runoff coefficient for paved surfaces a value of 1.0. A value of 0.9 was used in the Drainage Calculations. However, sufficient areas were used in the calculations for potential runoff which make the Design of 3 - 10' dia. x 10' deep leaching pools adequate. 3. Road Cross Section: The typical section shown on the drawing does not meet Town Specifications for Minor Subdivisions. This section of the code was updated on 11/27/90 and it requires a 4" compacted thickness Sub Base of Stone Blend or Crushed Concrete 2V' thick Asphalt Binder and a 1Y" thick Asphalt Wearing Surface. The Wearing Surface can be substituted by a Double Course of Bituminous Surface Treatment ( Oil & Stone) . If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact my office. S ' erely, ames A. chter, A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs file TOWNMU R , MWD I OUt F u��( �' � r%y PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS c " n ttt ` Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS '�- ,y ��� �- George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ''�_j,� ��C Supervisor Richard G. Ward " 0\ �t Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa, Mark McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kennethh L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLDrr Fax (516) 765-1823 _rs6ruarV 5 , 199 .., Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of - 2 EA_ T _'Rbw L-t Hamlet/Locality /1 1 _ l IG)2,0qu0 S.C.D.P.W. Topo No. : Zoning $ 0 S.C. Tax Map No. : )Od0 _ I D 4 Major Sub. )< Minor Sub. Site Plan Cluster MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Y Preliminary Plat (3 copies) /\�4}Road1 Profiles ( 1) � r �1491 Drainage Plans (1) _Topogroaphical Map (1) Site Plan (1) _ Grading Plan (1) Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet CONTINUED ,!- - • 40C REFERRAL C REFERRAL CRITERIA: SE RA STATUS: I. The project is an C nlisted) (Type I) (Type II)Action. 2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3• E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes) 4. The proposed division has req 'ved approval from the S.C. Dept of Health. (Yes) No) Comments: --------------------------------- We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) No Referral received by Suffolk CountyPlannin Co 19_ and assigned File NO. g mmission Very trul'7y' yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman 1 GORMAN -PETROL GROUP Service Stations Love Lane,Mattituck,N.Y. 11952 516- 298-8478 January 23, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM: 1000-109-1-23 Dear Chairman Orlowski, Enclosed are eight (8) copies of the minor subdivision map for the above referenced matter. We believe that this new map complies with your latest revision request, that is: 1. The building envelope for Lot 2 has been revised so that it is at least 175, in width at the building line. 2. The following restrictive covenant has been added: The vegetated buffer area is to remain undisturbed. Maintenance of natural vegetation (e.g. removal of dead or diseased plants) shall be the only activity allowed in the area. 3. Road profiles and drainage plans have been added. Also enclosed is the Full Environmental Assessment Form (Part 1 completed) for the subdivision application. We submitted our $400.00 check to your board on September 26, 1991 to cover the estimated cost for your Environmental Consultant to review the Full Environmental Assessment Form. Please authorize your consultant to proceed with his review at once. Very truly yours, RR M RR PETROL STATIONS LTD. 6 Q U LS D -gin Michael E. Gorman SOUTUULD TiMN cc: J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esquire PLANNING BDARD PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman d ` v ,.' - ^� 4 SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �� Supervisor 4 ,d Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Roac_ Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 22, 1991 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Major Subdivision of Petrol Stations, Ltd. Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The following resolution was duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 22, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the maps dated June 28, 1991 with the following condition: 1. The building envelope for Lot 2 is to be revised so that it is at least 175 ' in width at the building line (see enclosed sketch for clarification) . Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of preliminary maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The preliminary submission must include road profiles and drainage plans. These maps will be forwarded by the Planning Board to the Engineer for review. The Planning Board is requiring that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions be filed stating that: Page 2 Petrol Stations Ltd. 1. The vegetated buffer area is to remain undisturbed. Maintenance of natural vegetation (e.g. removal of dead or diseased plants) shall be the only activity allowed in the area. This covenant is also to be noted on the map. Please note that upon submission of the preliminary maps, the Planning Board will refer this subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for their review. You will be notified should any additional covenants and restrictions be required. For that reason, a draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions should be submitted after the Planning Board has reviewed the preliminary maps. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly /rJyours, 6�Glil�v� �, Bennett Orlowski, Jr/.-ms Chairman v NNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS nett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. '�? '",��`X p Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road I. Mark S. McDonald _ ""''±� P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 June 12, 1991 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. Dear Mr. McLaughlin: SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 The Planning Board has reconsidered its previous requirement, that your client obtain a variance from the lot width requirement for Lot 4. The right-of-way, and associated road, are to be designed so that these areas are included in the applicable lots. They are not to be designed as a separate lot. If the map is so revised, a variance from the lot width requirement will not be required. Upon submission of revised maps in accordance with Numbers 2 and 4 of the Planning Board's February 19, 1991 correspondence (copy enclosed for your convenience) , the Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals ATTORNEY AT LAW i 828 FRONT STREET, P.O.BOX 803 GREENPORT, NY 11944 7 (516)477-1016 )"� d 2 March 27, 1991 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FOR PETROL STATIONS, LTD. SCTM 1000 - 109 - 1 - 23 ' Gentlemen: S I am in receipt of your letter dated February 19, 1991 . I have no problem with any of your comments, except item 1 . Lot 4 has a minimum width of 150 . 30 feet. The twenty five foot right of way is simply that - an easement for ingress and egress for lots 1 , 2 and 3 . The owner of Lot 4 owns the land over which there is said right of way. As a result, the lot width is in conformity with the require- ments in an RO District and no varience is require Vert ,,/u JKM/lmt "� cLath11n a PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS . Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman u SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ��`o �'.,cjC' Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall. 53095 Main Ro. Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 1197 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 19 , 1991 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. Dear Mr. McLaughlin: SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 The Planning Board reviewed the maps dated January 22, ' 1991, at their last work session. Below please find a list of their comments: 1 • Lot 4 does not meet the minimum lot width required in the RO District when the twenty-five foot right-of-way has been excluded. If a variance can be obtained from the Zoning Board of Appeals then the Planning Board could approve this subdivision. 2• The building envelope for Lot 1 must be shown. The envelope shall not include the sloped area. 3 • This application is considered a major, not a minor subdivision because a road must be built to provide access to the interior lots. The application fee submitted was for a minor subdivision, in the amount Of $2, 500. The application fee for this major subdivision is $1000 plus $100 per acre, or part thereof, which is a total of $1, 600. Accordingly, the Planning Board will request of the Town Board that it refund the difference; which is $900. 4• The zoning line between the RO and the R-40 districts shall be shown on Lot 4 . The map shall state that the part of Lot 4 that lies within the R-40 district shall be a vegetated buffer area. Upon submission of revised maps and a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. 0A Page 2 Petrol Stations Ltd. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ✓✓ Chairman CC: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals ATTO NE Lc<y\N/ � 828 FRONT STREET, P. O. BOX 803 /o"6 GREENPORT, NY 11944 (516)4771016 January 29, 1991 thold Town Planning Board n Hall, 53095 Main Road . Box 1179 thold, N.Y. 11971 Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations, Ltd. SCTM # 1000-109-1-23 entlemen: I have enclosed eight (8) copies of the revised proposed inor subdivision map in the above referenced matter pursuant o your letter dated November 27, 1990. Please accept this filing as an amended application for a four (4) lot minor subdivision. Regarding your require- mentithat Covenants and Restrictions be filed, we have no problem assuming that you are seeking to prevent any further development within lot four (4) on the proposed map. My client is willing to provide that the area of lot four (4) within the R-40 district will be left in its natural state to act as a buffer to the residential zone. Please advise me if you require anything further to process this application. Otherwise, please advise me of the date on which the Board will next consider this matter. Very/truly r ou �Ars� r C J. =Levin McLaughlin f 1 \\) JKM/dmd \ ;- enclosures anything, the Southold Code is more tainly devalue neighboring property • lax or permissive with resp ra ;oe area. Occupations than most 0W ordi- 5.And finally,a petition was subm. nances. I ted containing 75 names,which 100 p Essentially, the Southold Code de- cent of surrounding landowners voi t fines "Home Occupation" as pro- ed thew disapproval of project. fessional uses and certain limited handl- Note:This petition was lost from fil crgfts provided such occupations are so I'm submitting another copy. "located in a dwelling in which the In closing, the Southold Thwn Coc practitioner resides."Most such ordi- was promulgated to protect the Ian, nances confine such use to professional owner in just this type of situatio use conducted only within a specific Please obey Tbwn Code and deny th percentage of the first floor area. application. Tampering with the"Home Occupa- Thank you, tion" provision of the Southold Code Nancy Sawastynowicz by way of an amendment to permit the Southold, N.Y. conduct of business and industry in residential areas,let alone the construe- Suspicions tion of structures for these purposes; would destroy the integrity and intent of zoning. No one in Southold would be safe in the quiet enjoyment of their homes, for which the "Bundle of Rights"provides,were their neighbors permitted to conduct trade and com- merce next door. Were Councilman Penny to propose '.. such an-amendment, it would be yet j another "bad penny" amendment on behalf of special interests. Like the pro- verbial bad penny, such action would come back to haunt the residents of the town by marking one more step in the destruction of the character of the town. Can it also be that Councilman Pen- ny is opposed to citizens exercising their legal right to complain about the illegal Letters acts of neighbors? If this be the case, is this the proper person to chair the ' Continued from Page 8 town's Legislative Committee, or for that matter, to serve the town in any Carlson an Unfair advantage over his capacity? competitors whose overhead includes Very truly yours, investment in legally zoned property F. M. Flynn I and who are taxed accordingly. Would Southold, N.Y. it be cynical to raise the possibility that the enthusiastic support of the baymen for this operation arises,at least in part, Denied 1 from the benefits of dealing with a low Editor: i overhead operation? Open Letter Now it appears that Councilman Dear Members of the Planning Board: Penny has jumped into the fray with the In regard to the Subdivision Appli- presumed intent of garnering, at least, cation for Petrol Stations Ltd., SCTM - populist political support from special 111000-109-1-23,Appl.N.3972.I request interests in the town. He, reportedly, this application be denied for the 1 would completely abrogate in the pur- following reasons: pose and intent of zoning in the town 1. Thomas J. Gorman bought pro- by amending the provisions of"Home perty knowing access was limited. Occupations" as defined in the Thwn 2.Property width is only 125 feet on Coda Route 25. Proposed road would be Presumably the definition would be within five feet of house to the west. stretched unconscionably to include 3.Town Planner Valerie Scopaz in a such operations as Mr. Carlson's. Mr. memorandum dated June 5, 1987 voic- Carlson would be rewarded for flout- ed her disapproval of project. ing the law. 4.Project would include one existing Over the span of the last 25 years the home and barn, with two businesses writer has had occasion to examine operating from them. Three new literally,dozens of municipal codes. If homes,increased traffic and would cer- PLf�NNING BOARD MEMBERS t� s _ Be Inert Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ��' �� y� e ��!:f �C� Supervisor Richard G. Wardn, - i ,'3X Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-I823 November 27, 1990 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street Greenport, Ne w York 11944 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. ` Dear Mr. McLaughlin: SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 The Planning Board has re-reviewed the subdivision lotllocated infor thece (RO) eabove mentioneResidential/Offiain reference to the ( ) District. The Board is amending its prior request that the lot line follow ROeanduthery of the zoninR-40 Districtsgcannlie. The lot to be located be designed as a 40, 000 square foot lot. However, the Board will require that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions be filed stating that the area in the R-40 District is to be left in its natural state to act as a buffer to the residential zone. Should your client redesign the layout as noted above, an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals will not be necessary. However, variances may be required for those lots dep thathdo not meet the minimum requirements for lot width and or It should be noted that the map that was submitted to the Planning Board is for three ( 3 ) lots. The Board can not review the four (4) lot proposal that was submitted to the Zoning Board Of Appeals for the variance unless you revise your application before the Planning Board and submit revised maps. !1 �' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman — SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa,, Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board Of Appeals FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman RE: Petrol Stations Ltd. ��f SCTM# 1.000-109-1-23 Appl. No. 3972 DATE: October 5, 1990 The Planning Board has reviewed the above mentioned application in reference to the area variance which is before your Board. The proposed lot, which is located within the boundaries of the Residential/Office (RO) District is 25,603 square feet in. area, excluding the right-of-way. The minimum lot size in a RO District is 40,000 square feet in area. Thus, the proposed lot is 14, 397 square feet shy of the minimum requirements for this zone. The Planning Board has no objection to the granting of an area variance for Lot Number 4 in the above mentioned subdivision. This non-conforming lot was created by the arbitrary Residential/Office District line. It should be noted that the Planning Board will be requiring that all lots have access from the proposed road. Also, the map that was submitted to your office for purposes of the area variance is different from that which was submitted to the Planning Board office for the subdivision proposal. The- application before the Planning Board is for a three lot subdivision. This revision, as with the other amendments which were made to the map, will be reviewed by the Planning Board during the subdivision review should the area variance be granted by your Board. � S Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals i 3 J y PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS n Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �Y� '`� eS SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 10, 1990 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street x Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Petrol Stations, Ltd. SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The Planning Board reviewed the maps dated February 5, 1987 for the above mentioned subdivision. Lot #3 is located in the Residential/Office (RO) District. This district requires a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet. The lot as proposed is 35,406 square feet in area, approximately 4,710 square feet of that being in the residential zone. The lot does not meet the minimum requirements of the District. Therefore, a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals is required. In addition, the Board is not in favor of the RO lot encroaching on the residential district. The lot line must follow the boundary of the zoning line. The Planning Board can not proceed with the subdivision review until such time that a variance is granted by the Zoning Board of appeals. Therefore, it is recommended that you make an application to the Zoning Board of Appeals as soon as possible. Upon receipt of a positive determination from the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Planning Board will proceed with your application. Please note that the Planning Board will be requiring the following information on the revised subdivision plat: 1• The proposed road must terminate in a cul-de-sac ( see enclosed map for an illustration) ; 2• Access to all lots must be from the proposed road; 3 . The map must be drawn at a scale of 1,, = 100' than 1" = 601 . rather 4. The current zoning districts must be noted on the map. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ins Chairman enc. GORMAN - PETROL Service Stations H5 GROUP Love Lane, Mattituck,N.Y. 11952 516- 298-8478 August 31, 1994 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Richard G. Ward, Chairman Re: Subdivision appication for Petrol Stations Ltd. North side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM: 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Ward, We have withdrawn our application with the Zoning Board of Appeals for a lot area variance. Enclosed are eight (8) copies of our revised subdivision map. The number of lots has been reduced from four to three. The improved lot (designated as Lot 4 on previous map) is now designated as Lot 3 and it has an area of 137,232 square feet (123,554 square feet exclusive of right of way). Very truly yours, PETROL STATIONS LTD. �a r '�> e,'Z� Michael E. Gorman `t1a31C11 csrnvan rC. amus cc ?du- sJbd,ko�Z-03 ' 1 �4& CDL- ;6A "-Q-& e L q S 6 P4c;a� Pncce� 1r�t, -4 J.Sc � reu%CWQ,6 N.vea eYL { �/qs VTl. Y'O'VJ �0l'fi� \T RyygM n2U'V C/ ✓M f S w r-Q¢c��N� I-D+ Sinov � J�S.Sn re-U 4�/✓, x naso �iScvsFR I w JqR, w' Cl Ma. Gs2yro r�. Ike OKC S'0 �x L5 15 U 15 Me, �etm�vY cz�so c9:S c 1 zee ; r,� rop o sj 311994 -t° �� l c Es � Imo. Q M�Q mow SOUTH010IawN �^ow �eU 9ef9 ProCQeC9. pANN 80AR0 �S Pg � GORMAN - PETROL Service Stations M5 GROUP Love Lane, Mattituck,N.Y. 11952 August 31, 1994 516- 298-8478 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Richard G. Ward, Chairman Re: Subdivision appication for Petrol Stations Ltd. North side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM: 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Ward, We have withdrawn our application with the Zoning Board of Appeals for a lot area variance. Enclosed are eight (8) copies of our revised subdivision map. The number of lots has been reduced from four to three. The improved lot (designated as Lot 4 on previous map) is now designated as Lot 3 and it has an area of 137,232 square feet (123,554 square feet exclusive of right of way). Very truly yours, PETROL STATIONS LTD. Michael E. Gorman INS 31 X94 P Lown NI 80ARn SuB� Pg CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT T i New Suffolk Road, PO Box 930, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Flc Telephone (516) 734-6907 • Fax (516) 734-7079 July 31, 1994 Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Southold Town Planning Bd. Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Ref: Petrol Stations Ltd. Dear Mr. Ward, Reference the above agent and map. It is the opinion of the Board that a well is not required at this time. If there are any changes, please advise. Yours truly, Bogard of Fire Commissioners Matthew J. Martin Secretary cc:R.M.Doroski I I 2 � iUi °'" BOARD Y� �,f Mi y PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 9 �%w p Richard G.Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road n� Bennett Orlowski,Jr. , '► -� � -�. P. O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, New York 11971 �,' 7� �° , Kenneth L Edwards '=, ' _✓ Fax(516)765-3136 > Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 29, 1994 J. Kevin McLaughlin Attorney at Law P.O. Box 1210 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Subdivision for Petrol Stations SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 28, 1994 : BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of preliminary approval from March 14, 1994 to September 14 , 1994 . Conditional preliminary approval was granted on September 14, 1992 . Please note that this additional extension is the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, qq � Richard G. Ward Chairman � � Su8Gr4 ATTORNEY ALAW 1050 YaarJs Ate., FO Bmc 1210 Sautr old, New York 11971 15181](JMM 765-6085 March 3 , 1994 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Town Hall , 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Subdivision for Petrol Stations Ltd. Gentlemen: I have enclosed a copy of my letter to the Board of Appeals . As you can see, there is on-going negotiations regarding the nature of the relief required from the Board of Appeals and the best manner in which to accomplish same to the satisfaction of all parties . As a result, please provide the applicant with an extension of the preliminary approval , so that we can obtain all necessary relief and then return to the Planning Board to finalize this subdivision. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me . i Very tru o J n McLa cc: Petrol Stations Ltd . r.L;° � D 6 • s ,� Pb AK �s ATTORNEY AT LA 1050 Yourgs Ace., PO BzDc 1210 Suut2�old, Akw York 11971 151 765-6085 March 3 , 1994 SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS Town Hall , 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Pending Application - Petrol Stations Ltd . Dear Mr. Goeringer : Please be advised that the applicant and the next-door neighbor are still in the process of finalizing a plan acceptable to all, so that same can be submitted to the Southold Town Building Department for review and issuance of all necessary Notices of Disapproval . We would then be in a position to seek all necessary relief from your Board and to consolidate same with the pending application. Please hold the pending application in abeyance until all requests for relief can be consolidated. If you have any questions in this regard, please feel free to contact me. yo r�,i:'��, ,Very�tru in� Mc au hli cc : Petrol Stations , Ltd . Richard F. Lark, Esq . ° D MAR 7 1994 swTMD TOWN PLANNING BOARD e ,> � � LAW �fK 1 ATTORNEY AT 1g2Bic 1210 971 (516)10 M 765-6085 November 8, 1993 SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Appl . No. 4195 - Application of Petrol Stations, Ltd. Gentlemen: Please be advised that Richard Lark and myself met with Assistant Town Attorney, Matt Kiernan, and the Building Department on October 29 , 1993 . At that time the subject property was discussed in detail and the Building Department agreed to further review their file in this matter regarding the possibility of further Notices of Disapproval . To date, I have not received any further communication from the Building Department . As a result, request is hereby made to further adjourn this application until your December hearing. By that time, it is anticipated that any necessary further applications can be filed and joined with the present application. If you have any questions in this regard , please feel free to contact me . Very rul yo J. i al n Hand Delivered cc : Richard F . Lark, Esq. ell z V J4 I 0 :.. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ? ` Y : SCOTT L. HARRIS Richard G. Ward,Chairman ' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham,Jr. ^ � r ' Bennett Orlowski,Jr. ,I ,- Town Hall,53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald -s..- P. O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold,New York 11971 Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 14, 1993 Thomas J. Gorman Petrol Stations Ltd. Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Subdivision for Petrol Stations SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on September 13 , 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six ( 6) month extension of preliminary approval from September 14, 1993 to March 14, 1994. Conditional preliminary approval was granted on September 14, 1992. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, g� Richard G. Ward Atr Chairman CC: Zoning Board of Appeals • � su B�i� ATTORNEY AT LA � � 5 1050 Yapgs Axe., lid Bac 1210 XOMMMWONDOW Sazthald, M-W York 11971 16161 0 765-6085 August 31 , 1993 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold , New York 11971 Attn. Richard G. Ward, Chairman Re : Petrol Stations Ltd . SCTM # 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Ward : Request is hereby made for a six (6) month extension of the conditioinal preliminary approval of the subdivision map in the above-referenced matter, which is scheduled to expire on September 14 , 1993 . On behalf of my client, I am in the process of applying for an area variance to allow the existing uses to continue within Lot 4 of said proposed subdivision . I will keep your office apprised of the status of the variance0aa Ver , J. �cc : Petrol Stations Ltd .Matthew G. Kiernan, Assist t To SEP 11993 4 .rn r.rr_�z� Slfti�F�LC� �cllFFfil C` 17,G HARVEY A. ARNOFF c Town Attorney vG, SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor MATTHEW G. KIERNAN Assistant Town Attorney s " ,- Town Hal(, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY Telephone(516)765-1800 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 23, 1993 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Thomas J. Gorman Petrol Stations, Ltd. P.O. Box 1445 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 Re: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations, Ltd. Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: Pursuant to our conversation of today's date, this will confirm that you are proceeding with the construction of the curb-cut only at the above-referenced location. I am aware that this curb-cut has been permitted by the State of New York under permit number 10-93-0270. Furthermore, this will confirm that you do not intend to proceed with road and/or driveway construction on this site until you have received a subdivision approval from the Planning Board. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me. erAtryours,l� • f :. 60.4. Kiernan, ssistant Town Attorney MGK:cc - cc: Richard G. Ward, Chariman of the Planning Board Thomas Fisher, Building Inspector � 2 Q Gary Fish, Building Inspector �' AUG f M E M O R A N D U M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO14 LONG ISLAND. REGION 10 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & SAFET'r FAX: (516) 360-6024 DATE: g 3 T0: FROM: REMARKS; �d,I ✓� to '�, ` ea [�� t I o- _ S,sIie NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS ONE (r n �y P^ N�-)'� r_ lilll hlu IUI r . u_ r PERM 42n(12192) S E OF NEW YORK DEPARIMENI"OF IIIANS H IA11ON HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT Permit Fee: $ Permit No.: 10 - 93 - 0270 Insurance Fee: $ �. „f• Project Identigoatlon No- Total Received: $ ,.,., ,.� "Completion Dale: Check or M.O. No, 1 SH No Liability Insurance I''olicy No : grfpiring Deposit ROC for $ J(t Check or M.O. No.: !. Dated pfq r, v Permittee: Estimated Cost of Work Performed In the Slate Right-of,Way& 0 of Chargeable to Bond No.: I ;,Ilii i. r1tJlor Undertaking on File' ' } 'i) )(1) ' t ! tIC';' . Sitting Address: (cornpiatu d udrwant from Auu") Return of Deposit Made Payable,to icompiote,f ddforani from Perm,n< Under the provisions of the Highway Law or Vehicle&Traffic Law permission Is hereby granted to the permittee to; It, OIEI; rho 1,lcof, r _ 5 b,0 AtVAI;'S tAN[ r,!!cH%klf IOR. IHf ptik4,O5fOr 11,81AU.ING G ,-(," PI IV O."N11rf11 COPO "rif k't Alb )furl krA41Nv A IHr.! 1 I HONAkCI. AHA.ALI wokr f0 N rt 1fk NYS `(�i (I r.:. IfPfREG bV NYS i.t+ilN.ih.ha1P114GrN(' 11V, fFrO1Ei110h u Ir•.I11C -Hld.t 8E' 1hF Q%ON6SILlIY Of THr Hi,!Jllif rI Alt ?1M1;• uNlil COHrII,1.1011 Aft tf!INKF OF iij 9rlr pr N'ic- THE PERMl1-IEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC. IN ADDITION ANYBODY WORKING IN THE RIGHT OF WAY IS REQUIRED TO WEAR A HARD HAT AND A REFLECTIVE SAFETY VEST. AN'YOil WORKING.WITHIN T•f R.O.W. WILL WEAR HIGH VISIBILITY APPAREL(ORANGE(YELLOW)AND HARD HAT. County SDb I CJI H Municipality . nr;i i in 1, Route Of- as set forth and resposentod in the attached application at the particular location or area, or over the routes as stated therein, it required: an pursuant to the conditions and regulations whether, general or special, and methods of performing work, If anv; all of which are set forth in lh• application and form of this permit Dated at Dafo Signad: I `' Commissioner of Transportation By: „I ICY 1` . Lill,, IMPORTANT This permit,w)th application and drawing (or copies thereof)attached shall be placed in the hands of the contractor before any Work begins NOTICE: Before work Is started and Npon it? cg9plation,the permittee absolutely must not�fy,,t7e Res dint eppl1egr. 1 ( N. is�.,, )•.e I F U11 PHI N • Nf It, Y'JL'I t ).:` r11. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK AUTHORIZED, THE FOLLOWING WILL BE COMPLE'I"ED AND SIGNED BY THE PEPIMITTEE AN( DELIVERED TO THE RESIDENT ENGINEER. Work authorized by this Permit was completed on DALE Refund of desposit or return of bond or reduction of amount charged against band or deposit on file for this permit whichever isappropriate, i requested. DATE PERMITTEE ����— AUTHORIZEDAf)EN1 of Any) Upon acceptance of work performod As satisfactorily completed, the Resident Engineer will sign the following and forward to the RegionE Office. Work authorized by this Permit has boon satisfactorily completed and is accepted(Reverse aide of this form must be completed). I)AIL - RESIDENT ENGINEER 'rho ROgionalOffice will forward this form to the Main Office with the appropriate box checked. ( •� j w" ) ,w,::. lo: HIGHWAY PERMIT SECTION: Refuhd of DepoAft On this Permit is authorized. AUG 3 { U Return of Bond furnished for this Permit Is authorized. ) li, 1 U Amount charged against Blanks! Bond tot this permit may be cancelled. U Retain Bond for funure permits. S3 4v DAt'E HEG!O A TRAFFIC F,NGIN '! The Issuing authority reserves the right to suspend or revoke this permit, at Its discretion without a heating or the necessity of showing cause erthor before or during the Opwalions autnorizod. The Perniltlee will cause an approved copy of rho application to be and remain attached hereto until all Work under the permit Is salisfactoril completed, in accordance with th forms of the attached application. All damaged of distributed areas resulting from work performed.pursuant I.. Ihls pelmlt will be repaired to the sati031-don of the Depaltmenl of Transportation ".Upon completion of the work within the state highway right-of-way, authorized by the work permit, the person, firm, corporation municipality, or state department or agency, and his or Its successors In Interest,shall be responsible for the maintenance and rero s- 01 such work or portion of such work as set forth within the terms and conditions of the work permit. �o uUfFD(,�`l 49, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o COD 2 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman a SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. ward9�� �o Mark S. McDonald ?2� ��� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 5, 1993 Thomas J. Gorman Gorman - Petrol Group Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM## 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: As you know, the issue pertaining to the amount of land required per use for Lot Number 4 in the above mentioned proposed subdivision has been reviewed in depth by the Planning Board, Zoning Board and Town Attorney. 2 have enclosed a copy of a memorandum from Matthew Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney, addressed to both the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Planning Board, in regard to the above mentioned issue. As stated in the memorandum, one hundred twenty thousand (120,000) square feet of lot area is required for the three principal uses currently existing. Before the Planning Board can proceed with this application the map must be revised so that Lot Number 4 contains enough area for each use. As you know, your client has the right to follow the procedures to apply for an area variance from the Board of Appeals for proposed Lot Number 4. However, the Planning Board can not guarantee that such a variance will be approved. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. SZ ncerely, ardsj G. War Chairman enc. 1c: J. Kevin McLaughlin, Attorney for Applicant Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Matthew G. Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney ^n S HARVEY A. ARNOFT Town Allomey ? S('UTT L HARRIS V/ 's,l Via,✓ �� .superV %m MATTHEW G. KIERNAN 'Afih t Town Attomey 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1923 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY Telephone (516) 765-1900 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Gerard P. Coehringer, Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals Richard C. Ward, Chairman of the Planning Board FROM: Matthew C. Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney RE: Petrol Stations SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 As you recall, on July 8, 1993, we met with regard to the above-referenced application. After discussing the matter, it was agreed that the issue in dispute concerned the interpretation of § 100-71(B) of the Zoning Code and, more specifically, whether each use permitted by that Section required forty thousand (40,000) square feet of lot area. The wording of the Town Code seems provided that not more than use clear. The phrase 11thousone (1) shall be allowed for each forty and (40,000) square feet of lot area: . " Of statutory construction, each is unambiguous. As a matter pusepeited by under this section shall require ortyp thousand r(40t000) square feetcof tion l t area. With regard to the above-referenced application, it would appear that one hundred twenty thousand (120,000) square feet of lot area is required for the three principal uses currently existing (i.e., architect's office, residential use of a house and a real estate office) . I trust that the foregoing resolves the issue in dispute. Should You require anything further from me, please let me know. cc: Harvey A. Arnoff, Town Attorney �gUFFO(,� m s o�O� COGy HARVEY A. ARNOFF y Town Attornex SCOTT L. HARRIS y n� • �'� Supervisor MATTHEW G. KIERNAN y��( `)�� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Assistant Town Attorney P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY Telephone (516) 765-1800 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals Richard G. Ward, Chairman of the Planning Board FROM: Matthew G. Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney RE: Petrol Stations SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 As you recall, on July 8, 1993, we met with regard to the above-referenced application. After discussing the matter, it was agreed that the issue in dispute concerned the interpretation of 4 100-71 (B) of the Zoning Code and, more specifically, whether each use permitted by that Section required forty thousand (40,000) square feet of lot area. The wording of the Town Code seems clear. The phrase " provided that not more than one (1) use shall be allowed for each forty thousand (40,000) square feet of lot area: . . ." is unambiguous. As a matter of statutory construction, each principal use permitted by special exception under this section shall require forty thousand (40,000) square feet of lot area. With regard to the above-referenced application, it would appear that one hundred twenty thousand (120,000) square feet of lot area is required for the three principal uses currently existing (i.e., architect's office, residential use of a house and a real estate office) . trust that the foregoing resolves the issue in dispute. Should you require anything further from me, please let me know. cc: Harvey A. Arnoff, Town Attorney JUL. 2 1 1993 f'8 GORMAN - PETROL GROUP VIS Service Stations Love Lane,Mattituck,N.Y. 11952 June 14, 1993 516- 298-8478 Planning Board Office Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Richard G. Ward, Chairman U Re: Subdivision application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North side of Main Road, Cutchogue, New York ` 5 SCTM: 1000-109-1-23 l Gentlemen, SOUTHOLDTOWN PLANNING BOARD We are in receipt of your letters dated May 25, 1993 and June 4, 1993 in which you enclosed copies of correspondence between the Planning Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals. The stated reasons for this correspondence are the issues related to the use of the property. Thou uses arose igh not mentioned in the correspondence, the n the Planning Board's continuing discussion regarding our bond estimate which was originally reviewed at the Planning Board's meeting of February on o8,p1993. Right-of-Way History 1. The 25' right-of-way has been located in its present location as per the Planning Board's request ever since our original subdivision application (map dated January 12, 1987). 2. The Planning Board adopted the Engineering Inspector's report of August 10, 1992 on August 17, 1992. 3• Our bond estimate in the amount of $54,738.00 was submitted on December 31, 1992. to the Planning Board 4. Our bond estimate was revised downwards to $48,480.00 on January 11, 1993 by James Richter, Town Engineering Inspector and was to be reviewed at the Planning Board's meeting of February 8, 1993. 5. Your letter of January 19, 1993 requested that the proposed road be located as far to the east side of the right-of-way as possible due to its proximity to existing homes (the home of Barbara Haurus was built only 5' from our western property line). 6. The secretary of the Planning Board called our office On March 26, 1993 and asked if we would consider increasing the width of the right-of-way (our bond estimate had been put on hold by the Town Board at the behest of Councilman George Penny awaiting clarification of the right-of-way). Councilman Penny was seen making an unauthorized inspection (taking measurements) of our property during March. We wonder on whose authority and in what capacity he was making this inspection. This assuredly is not a job of a Councilman on the Town Board. resent his intrusion into this matter and his illegal trespass on our property. We 7. To address the concerns of the Planning Board and neighbors, we met with the board on the afternoon of April 5, 1993. In consideration of the interests of the Planning Board and neighbors, we agreed to locate the proposed road at the east side of the right-of-way and offered to erect a wood stockade fence to screen it from the neighbors' view. When the board asked us to consider increasing the width of the right of way from 25' to 40' (Councilman Penny's request), we declined. No questions were asked us regarding the use of the property at this time. 8. As of this date, we are still awaiting approval of our bond estimate. In consideration of our concessions, we hope that the Planning Board will timely approve our bond estimate and revised plans for this subdivision after so many delays. Approval was previously granted and we believe that the concerns of the Planning Board and our neighbors were addressed by our relocation of the proposed road and our offer to erect a wood stockade fence. Thus, we believe that the request to increase the width of the right-of-way was arbitrary and capricious. Your letter of April 14, 1993 requested clarification of the uses on the property. In our reply letter of April 14, 1993, we explained these different uses. If you had asked, we would have told you that all of these uses existed prior to the enactment of the new zoning code on February 23, 1989. Occupancy History I. Petrol Stations Limited acquired title to the property on December 30, 1986. At this time, building improvements consisted of a two story framed dwelling; a 1i story framed antique shop; a one story, wood framed garage; a shed; and a dilapidated outhouse (shed on certificate of occupancy). 2. The shareholders comprising Petrol Stations Limited are Michael E. Gorman, Thomas J. Gorman, and Thomas J. Gorman, Jr. The partners comprising Gorman & Associates are Michael E. Gorman, Thomas J. Gorman, and Thomas J. Gorman, Jr. Both businesses are exclusively family owned, real estate businesses which operate out of our Cutchogue office. 3. We began renovating the two story frame dwelling immediately after purchase and occupied the building while construction was in progress. Enclosed is a copy of the sign permit which we received from the Southold Building Department on January 30, 1987. In his letter of May 5, 1993, Mr. Goehringer mistakenly assumes that this building was occupied after the architect's office when in fact it was occupied before the architect's office. He also incorrectly assumes that the residential apartment is a rental apartment. Building occupants include Gorman & Associates (real estate office) and Michael E. Gorman (primary residence). Due to the layout of the building, the residential and office uses are inseparable and can only be utilized by the same occupant. 4. The 11 story frame antique shop (2 story shop on Certificate of Occupancy) was leased to Mr. Thomas Samuels for use as an architect's office on April 1, 1987. Enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Occupancy issued for this building on January 11, 1993 (application was filed July 31, 1987). In his letter of May 5, 1993, Mr. Goehringer confuses this building with the garage and states that it was "used for the storage of antique furniture and similar items by the resident of the house" (History - item 2). Mr. Goehringer fails to mention that this building was also used for the sale of antiques. Enclosed is a copy of the Property Record 2 - Card from the Southold Assessorfs Office which we acquired prior to purchasing the property which refers to this building as an "antique shop." Also enclosed is a copy of a picture taken of the antique shop in January, 1987. Please note the "ANTIQUES" sign on the front of the building. 5. Mr. Goehringer concludes his letter of May 5, 1993 by stating that "In any event a variance application will also be required for insufficient width for the rear lots as drawn, and reduced frontage along the Main Road for a new right-of-way from 150.30 feet to 124.85 feet." Enclosed is a copy of a letter dated June 12, 1991 from the Planning Board to our attorney, J. Kevin McLaughlin (the board also supplied a copy to Mr. Goehringer). This letter states that "The right-of-way, and associated road, are to be designed so that these areas are included in the applicable lots. They are not to be designed as a separate lot. If the map is so revised, a variance from the lot width requirement will not be required." These revisions (and others) were made to our subsequent map dated June 28, 1991. Regarding Mr. Goehringer's contention that a lot width variance is required for the rear lots, please note that the layout and dimensions of these lots has remained unchanged (except for building envelopes) since our map of January 22, 1991 (and subsequent revisions as requested by the Planning Board for maps of June 28, 1991, January 16, 1992, and December 1, 1992). Conditional sketch plan approval was granted October 22, 1991 and conditional preliminary approval granted September 14, 1992 with no mention of any lot width variance requirement. Inasmuch as this application has been pending since January 12, 1987, we hope for an expedient approval of our bond estimate as time is of the essence. In short, we have made every effort to work with the Planning Board and have made many revisions to our original plan with documented, numerous delays and additional expenses. Very truly ours, PETRO ONS LTD. C/ / Thomas Go man Encl. cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Scott L. Harris, Supervisor J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esq. Mars, Sloan & Conlon, Esqs. George Penny - 3 - 7033 No. a TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N" 15653 Z Dote .. ..*V%0.4-oAwL... ..Q......... ... 19. Permission is herby granted �t jp� 4TTA*w ..0%��. • + Gb "1Rnx.. -.... ° .. . to ............................................................................. .. ............ �'' .�`..`` . .... at Promises bcoted at :.2ZA.Ay:....... r ra..g.t/.......... ' c(Aa .............. .. .............. .. t ... ................................................ .............� . ............................ ...... County Tax Mop No. 1000 Section ................................................................ q .......................................... �O.•.1....... Block ....d,�.,,,,•,,,,, Lot No. ..�.�............. Pursuant to application doted ..(1r..3�w..... ... '$ Building Inspector. ....................... 19.A A, and approved by the Fee S•.c �T�... ,, ........t.. trz .................Bui........... np napector Rev. 6/30/80 SHO CARD • PLYWOOD • PLASTIC 5 META • ALUMINUM • OILCLOTH 0 • GOLD LEAF LETTERING ILLUMINATED SIGNS • GROUND SIGNS • RAISED LETTERS • STOREFRONTSIGNS INSTALLATION l7 V1'1'4, n • ELECTRIC SIGN MAINTENANCE AC 0 C' I "�'' Q • BOAT and TRUCK LETTERING Iva I • CRANE SERVICE / 19� 07 n N11 �1o, �1. Tax 335 9c� WQ1vL Cayy1 T .� 95- 54'19 Terms: A 1 R%Monthly Late Payment Charge will be added on unpaid balances over 30 days past due,an annual percentage rate of 18%simple interest. • FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-22098 Date JANUARY 11 1993 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ALTERATION Location of Property 25235 MAIN Street ROAD CStreetUE NEW YORK House No. Hamlet 23 County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 109 Block 1 Lot subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this Office dated JULY 31 1987 ursuant to which Building Permit No. 16675-Z .—. ,_dated DECEMBER 15 1987 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements Of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ALTER & CONVERT SEASONAL ANTI UE STORE TO ARCHITECTS OFFICE AS APPLIED FOR. The certificate is issued to PETROL STATIONS LTD. (owners) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL_ N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N-104736 - NOVEMBER 27 1989 PLUMBERS CERTIFTCATTON DATED N A Bu ing Inspector Rev. 1/81 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST! SUB. -" LOTzmc —— . pro-► � r FORMER OW ER l ^ d a I(/ 7 {r v N td }: fie SKI - a urf — a/d Kt AGR S �CSWLA W TYPE OF BUILDING ee 6e —/Mt,,; it'd, C o e - C� RE5X10 SEAS. VL FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE �-r- REMARKS 600 Y 700 ' 700 .f 2 , i r-f7T , 4 _ L ' yam " — I� AGE I S�PJ� T4 t ` 2y _ BUILDING CONDITION 3 !' �� �s_ �� 1 NEIN I NORMAL ! BELOW - �— ABOVE FARM i Acre Value per VGlue Acre Tilloble Woodlcnd FRONTAGE ON ROAD r� Mecdowland DEPTH '-2 /� � 7 a f u 7,r� '4T; v / Hous@•PlolI 1 - 00 BULKHEAD Total r` ^ I DOCK COLOR TRIM Uf I I I ' I i I — I rig /3 7 f 3za 9 ��xtensran I I . Extensi n i Extension I I i i 6oundotion J fo h 2 Bath r ZO /60 jo Dinette cement f �� Floors I P Breezeway /O x ,S - ISO S'6 7J'i e4- Walls �l r Interior Finish �` ,(C6C. I LR. '- Fire Place h Heat �/ j Garage i� Y X 18 = y3L✓ �� oW DR. e Roof Rcoms Ist Floor Patio GQ o 1' BR. O. B. Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor FIN. B •2 �D /�/o >' .tr;,�i-„ ,Do er Total Driveway ",ZeA i,r> ,C 6 ' - �h w , /NIN,41NC BOARD MEMBERSySCOTT L. HARRIS Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ✓ 1� / „ Supervisor ge Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard O. Ward t Town Hall, 53095 Main Roat Mark S, McDonald P.O. Box 1179 enneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 phone (516) 765.1938 TOWN OF SOUTMOLD Fait (516) 765-1823 June 12, 1991 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. Dear Mr. McLaughlin: SCTMM 1000-109-1-23 The Planning Board has reconsidered its previous requirement, that your client obtain a variance from the lot width requirement for Lot 4 . The right-of-way, and associated road, are to be designed so that these areas are included in the applicable lots. They are not to be designed as a separate lot. if the map is so revised, a variance from the lot width requirement will not be required. Upon submission of revised maps in accordance with Numbers 2 and 4 of the Planning Board' s February 19, 1991 correspondence (copy enclosed for your convenience) , the Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, �y Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. CC. Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals {�T ,'jVwV C°G� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y A w P ^2i SCOTT L. HARRIS cp Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman '` 4�� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. °l�,( ,�y �'S Richard G. Ward r Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Richard G. Ward, Chairman and � Members of the Planning Board DATE: June 4 , 1993 RE: Petrol Stations SCTM # 1000-109-1-23 I am returning the Planning Board' s memorandum of. May 25, 1993 for inclusion into your public files for this case. Our request was made in accordance with Article XXVII, Section 100-271 D. , which permits a board to ask the Zoning Board of Appeals for an interpretation to determine the meaning of any provision in the Zoning Code or of any condition or requirement specified or made under its provisions. The meanings of certain statements in your May 5th memorandum were not immediately clear to us; and rather than make assumptions about how to interpret those statements, the Board decided to request further clarification. I understand that there may not be answers to all of our questions at the instant moment, and that a public hearing may need to be held to obtain further information. However, our questions are legitimate. Consequently, please return our request for interpretation to the public record in the file. cc: Town Attorney' s Office Michael Gorman APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS '^ SCOTT L.HARRIS VS Supervisor MS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman n Serge Doyen,Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road James Dinizio, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 Robert A.Villa ' _ i Southold, New York 11971 Richard C.Wilton J Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS Telephone (516) 765-1800 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Richard G. Ward, Chairman, PB FROM: Board of Appeals Jerry Goehringer, Chairman" DATE: May 26 , 1993 SUBJECT: Your Memorandum with Board Questions Pertaining to a Pending Site Plan Project of Petrol Stations ( 1000-109-1-23 ) Our department has received your "memorandum" with several questions - we agree with you that it appears to be caused by one ' s confusion. We have no intention of answering the questions in this memorandum. It is suggested that if members of the board do not understand the use regulations of the code, or have questions pertaining to legal issues such as those in your May 25, 1993 memorandum, then discussions should be held by the Chairman of the Department with the legal department of the Town. As Chairman of the ZBA, I would be happy to sit with you and the Town Attorney. Our department also has an application pending -- which has not as yet been amended to reflect the plan before you. We. will have questions and hopefully all questions will be answered appropriately at a public hearing before the Board of Appeals in order that all parties involved may have a fair hearing. The Planning Board' s May 25 , 1993 original memorandum is attached and returned to you. Attachment CC: Town Attorneys 4 0 -,, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS va 2 0 3 SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 1�0� �y ��0 Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa, Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Richard G. Ward, Chairman and 'Rs W/ds Members of the Planning Board DATE: May 25, 1993 RE: Petrol Stations SCTM # 1000-109-1-23' Thank you for your response of May 5, 1993 regarding the above-named site. In our review of same, other questions came up. Your memo indicates that while the residence was not in use at the time the retail antiques shop was converted to a professional office, it was converted to a combination residence and real estate office at some later date. Has the Zoning Board d/ttitt-.<, been able to determine whether this conversion occurred before ,�eouor after the February 23, 1989 enactment of the new Zoning N'.�. Code? We are confused about the use of the barn. In the memo, the use of the barn is described as a storage site for antiques owned by the resident of the house. The property owner indicated to us in a letter that the barn was an antiques store. The Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building Inspector in 1993 notes that the building was used as. a "seasonal antiques store" . ' Is the qZoning Board saying that it has determined that there was no �2d commercial use of the barn prior to its conversion to an architect' s office? -`� When the current Zoning Code was drafted our understanding of the purpose of the Residential Office district was that it would Provide for limited non-residential uses along with existing / residential uses of existing homes. This seems to have been I� echoed by the Zoning Board in its September 5, 1985 memorandum, / copy attached, in which the ZBA elucidated its position that a real estate office should be allowed as either a principal or an accessory use in conjunction with the residential use. J Also in keeping with this, we understood that the 40,000 square foot requirement for each additional use applied only to additional uses beyond the existing residence with one accessory office use. This reasoning was based on the fact that many if not most RO lots are about one acre in size. If the intent was to allow these lots to accomodate both a principal residential use with an accessory office use then it would make sense to require the addition of 40, 000 sq. ft. of land only when the addition of a third use was contemplated. If, however, we are reading the memorandum correctly, the Zoning Board of Appeals has ruled that in the instant case of Petrol Stations, the residential use of a house along with a small real estate office constitutes two principal uses; and that the architect' s office constitutes the third principal use. And, consequently, 110,000 square feet of land is required. Our confusion about this point is due to the fact that the i%l" < property owner, in a letter dated April 14 , 1993 , a copy of b1fxd,fd which is attached for your convenience, identifies the residential use of the existing house as a residential apartment. It may be that the property owner or a member of his family resides here and that the real-estate office is a yy family-run business. However, the May 5th memorandum describes .6 4> the residence as a rental apartment, which seems to contradict ,J-1 ,, the owner ' s assertion. But, perhaps we misunderstood the memorandum? fin, Gtv �c � We also would appreciate clarification as to what the Zoning Board is saying here about residential use of a house in the RO district. We are not sure if you are making a distinction between a principal use of a residence as the owner' s dwelling with an accessory family owned real estate office and that of a residence which the owner rents while also continuing to run the f, real estate business? If the Zoning Board is making that 111 " distinction for all RO properties, then we would appreciate Q � c�c�,I' knowing, for future reference, what distinguishes an accessory z nc real estate office use from a principal real estate office use �(n,r 15 in the RO district? k6W. 1 Finally, in reference to a question posed in our previous memo, 1 if all or any of these uses existed before the enactment of the 1989 Zoning Code, how do you interpret their non-conforming status? The primary question in our minds is how to accomodate the three uses, density-wise, given what seems to be their non-conforming status. As stated in previous paragraphs of this memo, our understanding of their non-conforming status led us to 4� ,. the conclusion that a sum total of only 80, 000 square feet is 1f Lneeded for the three uses on the site. Your memorandum seems to �e�etNl�td indicate otherwise. Are we interpreting it accurately? P� MS GORMAN - PETROL Service Stations GROUP Love Lane,Mattituck,N.Y. 1.1952 516-298-8478 April 14, 1993 Planning Board Office Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Richard G. Ward, Chairman Re: Subdivision appication for Petrol Stations Ltd. North side of Main Road, Cutchogue, New York SCTM: 1000-109-1-23 Gentlemen, We are in receipt of your letter dated April 14, 1993 regarding the use of our property. Enclosed is a copy of the latest version (12/1/92) our subdivision map. This map is the seventh revision since we began the subdivision process in the Spring of 1987 and it labels all structures on proposed Lot 4 (this portion of the property is zoned Residential Office RO). The two story frame building is utilized as a real estate office and a residential apartment (this building previously had the same use). The frame building (former barn) is utilized as an architect's office (this building previously was used for the sale of antiques and the recharging of fire extinguishers). The frame shed is utilized for storage and the frame garage is utilized as a residential garage. Enclosed are copies of the Certificates of Occupancy for these buildings. The rear portion of the property (proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3) is vacant, wooded land. This portion of the property was rezoned on January 10, 1989 from "A" Residential- Agricultural (80,000 s.f. minimum lot size) to Low Density Residential R-40 (40,000 s.f. minimum lot size) when the Town adopted the Master Plan update as prepared by the planning board. Our understanding of .the Master Plan is that residential development is to be concentrated in the hamlets, and the Town's rezoning of our property confirms this theory. Please note that our proposed lots more than conform to all requirements of the R-40 district. Lot 1 has an area of 1.965 acres, Lot 2 has an area of 1.792 acres, and Lot 3 has an area of 1.098 acres. Very truly yours, PETROL STATIONS LTD. Michael E. Gorman 11 �S 17 � iJ U IS y .O� OGS w 4;Y Southold Town Board of Appeal Un MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD• L.I.• N.Y.- 11971 III If LEPi(1ONE 1�5(161 /f>51% APPEALS BOARD - MEMBERS r1 II 11 :ERARD P. COEHRINCER, CHAIRMAN !•C SEP - S 1965 CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE. DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI _„__.... TO : Southold Town Board and Moinl,ors of th' Coiim, iL1, of Zoning-Master Plan Proposals FROM Southold Town Board of Appeals DATE : September 5 , 1985 SI1I;JECT : Re-Zoning Recommendations - main Roan , `.ioui. huld At a Regular Meeting of the Board of Appeals held Au,u•; I 72 , 1985 , it via,, the unanimous agreement of the members that ' hc . ! rip aiung the wort side of the Main Road in Southllld between 7ucicnr . Lanr: and Ackerly Pond Lane , be re-zoned Residential -Offi c . ( R(J ) to ail „w professional or- real estate or inv^siment br,.rer, nific•-, il.hur an a principal use or- an accessory use , in roiijulction with an existing residential use , for the fol 1owiny reasons : 1 . There are businesses (used in conjunction with or without residential uses ) existing in this vicinity that have been exist- inq . ince prior to the enactment of zoning in 1957 ( and dnpth(er hovinq received a use variance after meeting criteria ;et by the Court` ) • 7 . The existing structures which are substantial in si ,:c dre more Lh,In likely suitable to accommodate an office use 1n con.lunclion with the existing single- family residential use . 3 . Allowing a professional or real estate or investment- t.ype ullice as an accessory use in cnn,junction with Lhe presonL residential use of these structures would cncourage ae ., t.hetical silrround inys . Page 2 - September 5 , 1985 Subject : Re-Zoning Recommendations 4 . The present zoning district already permits those uses listed in the "RO" district , excepting professional offices as a principal use and business offices , and restaurants . It is also noted that Home Occupations as an accessory use in all the proposed districts , except LIO and LI , includes professional offices , and amends the definition of professional office. to include real estate brokers and similar occupations . Precedents have been set by the Courts and prior Decisions of this board that a real estate broker is not deemed a "professional " , whether it is an accessory use or otherwise . Therefore , the Board of Appeals strongly recommends that a real estate , stockbroker , investment broker , office be limited to be / established in areas zoned "RO" , as a principal use or an accessory (J/ use in conjunction with the residential use ; and to re zone to " RO" in Southold , particularly the area between Ackerly Pond Lane and Tuckers Lane along the west side of the Main Road , rather than allowing such as an accessory use within the entire Town of Southold . Thank you for considering our communications in this matter . GERARD P . GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN 1 k. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS O��S�FFO(� cOG SCOTT L.HARRIS VS Supervisor MS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman y x Jarge y Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road mes Dini io,Jr. �'f' pts P.O. Box 1179 Robert A.Villa ��l # �a Southold, New York 11971 Richard C.Wilton Fax (516)765-1823 Telephone (516)765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS Telephone (516)765-1800 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Richard G. Ward, Chairman, PB FROM: Board of Appeals Jerry Goehringer, Clxirm _ DATE: May 26, 1993 SUBJECT: Your Memorandum with Board Questions Pertaining to a Pending Site Plan Project of Petrol Stations ( 1000-109-1-23 ) Our department has received your "memorandum" with several questions - we agree with you that it appears to be caused by one's confusion. We have no intention of answering the questions in this memorandum. It is suggested that if members of the board do not understand the use regulations of the code, or have questions pertaining to legal issues such as those in your May 25, 1993 memorandum, then discussions should be held by the Chairman of the Department with the legal department of the Town. As Chairman of the ZBA, I would be happy to sit with you and the Town Attorney. Our department also has an application pending -- which has not as yet been amended to reflect the plan before you. We will have questions and hopefully all questions will be answered appropriately at a public hearing before the Board of Appeals in order that all parties involved may have a fair hearing. The Planning Board's May 25, 1993 original memorandum is attached and returned to you. i Attachment CC: Town Attorneys rLMAY21111W gUFFOj1,fc r P opo °may` PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y • SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman .j. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Richard G. Ward, Chairman and Members of the Planning Board DATE: May 25, 1993 RE: Petrol Stations SCTM # 1000-109-1-23 Thank you for your response of May 5, 1993 regarding the above-named site. In our review of same, other questions came up. Your memo indicates that while the residence was not in use at the time the retail antiques shop was converted to a professional office, it was converted to a combination residence and real estate office at some later date. Has the Zoning Board rttc..r been able to determine whether this conversion occurred before r �4 or after the February 23 , 1989 enactment of the new Zoning ' `e \Code? We are confused about the use of the barn. In the memo, the use of the barn is described as a storage site for antiques owned by the resident of the house. The property owner indicated to us in a letter that the barn was an antiques store. The Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building Inspector in 1993 notes that the building was used as a "seasonal antiques store" . Is the Zoning Board saying that it has determined that there was no P/2 commercial use of the barn prior to its conversion to an I ` architect' s office? t rt r P", When the current Zoning Code was drafted, our understanding of the purpose of the Residential Office district was that it would provide for limited non-residential uses along with existing residential uses of existing homes. This seems to have been echoed by the Zoning Board in its September 5, 1985 memorandum, copy attached, in which the ZBA elucidated its position that a real estate office should be allowed as either a principal or an accessory use in conjunction with the residential use. Also in keeping with this, we understood that the 40,000 square foot requirement for each additional use applied only to additional uses beyond the existing residence with one accessory office use. This reasoning was based on the fact that many if not most RO lots are about one acre in size. If the intent was to allow these lots to accomodate both a principal residential use with an accessory office use then it would make sense to require the addition of 40,000 sq. ft. of land only when the addition of a third use was contemplated. If, however, we are reading the memorandum correctly, the Zoning Board of Appeals has ruled that in the instant case of Petrol Stations, the residential use of a house along with a small real estate office constitutes two principal uses; and that the architect' s office constitutes the third principal use. And, consequently, 120,000 square feet of land is required. Our confusion about this point is due to the fact that the /�°r property owner, in a letter dated April 14, 1993 , a copy of a(f�c%� which is attached for your convenience, identifies the residential use of the existing house as a residential apartment. It may be that the property owner or a member of his family resides here and that the real-estate office is a 111t -j family-run business. However, the May 5th memorandum describes e" es the residence as a rental apartment, which seems to contradict the owner' s assertion. But, perhaps we misunderstood the memorandum? We also would appreciate clarification as to what the Zoning Board is saying here about residential use of a house in the RO district. We are not sure if you are making a distinction between a principal use of a residence as the owner' s dwelling with an accessory family owned real estate office and that of a residence which the owner rents while also continuing to run the Ny, real estate business? If the Zoning Board is making that aJ1 ' distinction for all RO properties, then we would appreciate 'd<<, knowing, for future reference, what distinguishes an accessory pe real estate office use from a principal real estate office use itt in the RO district? Finally, in reference to a question posed in our previous memo, if all or any of these uses existed before the enactment of the 1989 Zoning Code, how do you interpret their non-conforming status? The primary question in our minds is how to accomodate the three uses, density-wise, given what seems to be their non-conforming status. As stated in previous paragraphs of this 7 memo, our understanding of their non-conforming status led us to the conclusion that a sum total of only 80,000 square feet is //6w _needed for the three uses on the site. Your memorandum seems to )e_!efYnd° indicate otherwise. Are we interpreting it accurately? FFO(� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y u- . " T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. J���d Richard G. Ward ) Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 June 4, 1993 Michael E. Gorman Petrol Stations Ltd. Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Subdivision application for Petrol Stations Ltd, N/s State Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM # 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: The enclosed correspondence is for your information. Si cerely, �d G. Ward Chairman FFO( �ps� o Fico► APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS O py SCOTT L.HARRIS Supervisor Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman w x Serge Doyen,Jr. 5 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road James Dinizio,Jr. P.O. Box 1179 Robert A.Villa � c �a Southold, New York 11971 Richard C. Wilton Fax (516)765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS Telephone (516)765-1800 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM TO: Richard G. Ward, PB Chairman FROM: Jerry Goehringer, ZBA Chairman DATE: June 8, 1993 SUBJECT: Your Memorandum of June 4, 1993 PB Questions Pertaining to Petrol Stations 1000-109-1-23 Your memo of June 4, 1993 with attached copies (and copy of the May 25, 1993 PB memo) concerning questions in the above-noted project have been reviewed. Submission of written questions which concern facts and history of any pending project such as those asked by you in the May 25th questionnaire is not the same as a request for a formal interpretation. We will, however, try to provide some assistance informally - although the questions you ask truly should be answered by the applicant-property owner (or perhaps predecessors in title) , and building department, which had authority to issue the ( 1986) pre-certificate of occupancy. One of the questions you ask is when was the property converted from a single residence to a dual use? The record before the Planning Board shows a pre-certificate of occupancy for a single-family use and accessory buildings issued by a building inspector to Jane Marie Morris and Amy King in 1986. Legal uses prior to the 1989 zoning code must either have had to be permitted in that "A" Zone District, or had to be legally preexisting of the enactment of that zone (a/k/a nonconforming use) . In the fourth paragraph of your May 25th questionnaire, you mention a 1985 memorandum to our previous Town Attorney. This memorandum was generalized, did not pertain to the new master plan revisions now in effect, and did not involve a review of Page�2 - June 8, 10 • Inter-Departmental orandum To: Mr. Richard G. Ward, PB Chairman Re: Petrol Stations 1000-109-1-23 at Cutchogue any particular parcel. Also, the ZBA did not elucidate that a real estate office was ever allowed as an accessory use. In fact, our files show that a real estate office has never been permitted as a principal use or accessory use in the "A" Zone District under the prior zoning code regulations. (Please let us know if you would like to see any of our files pertaining to this. ) Please note that the C.O. issued for a conversion of seasonal antique store to architects office on January 11, 1993 is shown to be based on the entire 5. 8 acre parcel as a single unit. The pending subdivision application before you is for an increase in use density and triggers an updated review under the current zoning regulations. With reference to the remaining paragraphs, there has been no ruling by the Board of Appeals as inferred by your comments. In fact, it is suggested that the owner follow the normal appeal process for the new proposal (now before the Planning Board) by submitting the maps to the Building Inspector for reviews - particularly when the the front lot is proposed to be substandard with less than 40,000 sq. ft. per principal use. ) If requested, the old appeal file could be amended (crediting the $150.00 fee paid previously towards the new amendment. ) It appears that someone does not agree with the uses listed on the Pre-C.O. of record. However, the difference in density from 1986 {a single-family unit vs. three to five office or residential uses on 5. 836 acres, and particularly two to three units on 40,000 sq. ft. } is a substantial increase. Isn't it true that this proposal is for two or more uses on 40,000 sq. ft. (the new lot size proposed) . In any event and at the very least, the new, converted architect offices in the rear barn building is a second principal use requiring 80,000 sq. ft. minimum {40,000 x 2 uses = 80,000 sq. ft. ) . You will also need to know whether or not the resident of the apartment is the same individual as the business office. Or are they are separate, non-incidental operations? For your assistance, I am attaching a copy of a recent area variance for a conversion of a residential use (previously an A-Zone) to office use in an RO zone. In this example, the main building was also preexisting of the 1957 zoning ordinance and used as a single-family residence. The new owner applied for a Special Exception and an area variance because the property size was nonconforming, in order to convert the residence for office use under the new Master Plan revisions adopted in 1989. The difference however is that the substandard lot size preexisted the 1957 zoning ordinance. We hope that this example might be helpful. Page �3 - June 8, 1 • Inter-Departmental orandum To: Mr. Richard G. Ward, PB Chairman Re: Petrol Stations 1000-109-1-23 at Cutchogue Please do inform the property owner in the Petrol Stations project of the procedures available to him if he should decide two principal uses on less than 80,000 sq. ft. , or three principal uses on less than 120,000 sq. ft. The building inspector should be given an opportunity to discuss his office file. The new plan before the Planning Board should be submitted to the Building Department. A copy of the procedural chart is attached for your convenience and transmittal for his use. Attachments ( 2) cc: Building Inspectors Town Attorney' s Office APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L.HARRIS Gerard P.Goehringer,Chairman / Supervisor Charles Grigonis,Jr. 1 Serge Doyen,Jr. Town Hall,53095 Main Road James Dinizio,Jr. - P.O.Box 1179 Robert A. Villa Southold,New York 11971 Telephone 516)765-1809 t ` Fax (516)765-1823 Tele P ( Telephone (516)765-1800 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN Off'SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appl. No. 4011 . Upon Application of JOSEPH AND LINDA FISCHETTI . Request for variance recognizing this vacant lot to establish professional and business office use on this 11,656 sq. ft. nonconforming parcel. Zone District: Residential-Office (RO) . Location of Property: 235 Oaklawn Avenue, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Designation 1000-61-3-3. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 7, 1991; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following Findings of Fact: 1. By this application, applicants seek a determination under the Zoning Code that the subject premises complies with the applicable lot area and width regulations of the zoning code as applies in this Residential-Office (RO) Zone District for conversion of the existing single-family dwelling to professional/business office use. 2. The premises in question is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as No. 1000-61-3-3 and is located along the easterly side of Oaklawn Avenue, Hamlet and Town of Southold. 3 . Research of town records shows that the premises has been held in single and ownership and has been used as a single-family residence to the present time. Also, the following nonconformities of the land and buildings have existed since the enactment of zoning in 1957 : ( a) nonconforming lot width of 80. 80 feet; age 2, - Appl. No. (0117V Matter of LINDA FISCHETTI Decision Rendered July 12, 1991 I' 3. (b) nonconforming lot area of 11,656 sq. ft. ; (c) nonconforming front yard setback of the principal structure at 15 feet; (d) nonconforming northerly side yard setback of the principal structure at 12 feet. 4 . For the record, it is noted that on January 10, 1989, new Master Plan revisions were adopted by the Southold Town Board which changed the previous "A" Residential and Agricultural Zoning of this parcel to "RO" Residential Office. Prior to January 1989, the property was nonconforming as to total lot area ( 11, 656 in an 80,000 zoning classification) , and the use as a single-family residence continued as a conforming use. 5 . It is the position of this Board that the intent of the master plan revisions is to permit one of those uses listed under Section 100-71A, or as may be authorized by Special Exception from the Board of Appeals under Section 100-72B. The Town, in effect, has sanctioned the nonconformities of the property in adopting new standards for uses in this new zone district. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Villa, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, that the parcel which is currently identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as No. 1000-61-3-3, is hereby RECOGNIZED as a valid parcel, with the nonconformities stated in Paragraph 3, supra, and APPROVED for the purposes of receiving a Special Exception, by separate action, which has been applied for simultaneously with this appeal, for conversion of the dwelling to professional/business office use as provided by Section 100-71B of the Zoning Code. ._Vo of the Board: A es: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, W and Villa. (Membe Grigonis was absent due to ''�' ' P AILD Fd-L tas duly adopted. THh SOUT1iGLD m .•'r'I, CLERK DATE '7/-'/3;/ lk ��i GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN own Cleric, Tocvn of Sc,&old � � F BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW PROCEDURE Request made to building inspector for building permit I Reviewed by building inspector for compliance with - zoning ordinance I - subdivision regulations building codes,etc. health dept.regulations Conditions not met Site plan approval or special use permit required Building permit •must be denied All conditions met meking.a nt can seek y: Applicant referred to appro- priate body(planning board, omplying with requirements board of appeals or legis- vising plans lative body)for review eking a zoning change variance requestng an interpretation Building permit issued of building inspector decision Satisfactory relief achieved Approval received Building permit issued Building permit issued Construction completed according to plan Certificate of occupancy issued " L v , 7 GORMAN - PETROL Service Stations) G R O U P Love Lane, Mattituck,N.Y. 11952 516- 298-8478 April 14, 1993 Planning Board Office Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Richard G. Ward, Chairman Re: Subdivision appication for Petrol Stations Ltd. North side of Main Road, Cutchogue, New York SCTM: 1000-109-1-23 Gentlemen, We are in receipt of your letter dated April 14, 1993 regarding the use of our property. Enclosed is a copy of the latest version (12/1/92) our subdivision map. This map is the seventh revision since we began the subdivision process in the Spring of 1987 and it labels all structures on proposed Lot 4 (this portion of the property is zoned Residential Office RO). The two story frame building is utilized as a real estate office and a residential apartment (this building previously had the same use). The frame building (former barn) is utilized as an architect's office (this building previously was used for the sale of antiques and the recharging of fire extinguishers). The frame shed is utilized for storage and the frame garage is utilized as a residential garage. Enclosed are copies of the Certificates of Occupancy for these buildings. The rear portion of the property (proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3) is vacant, wooded land. This portion of the property was rezoned on January 10, 1989 from "A" Residential- Agricultural (80,000 s.f. minimum lot size) to Low Density Residential R-40 (40,000 s.f. minimum lot size) when the Town adopted the Master Plan update as prepared by the planning board. Our understanding of the Master Plan is that residential development is to be concentrated in the hamlets, and the Town's rezoning of our property confirms this theory. Please note that our proposed lots more than conform to all requirements of the R-40 district. Lot 1 has an area of 1.965 acres, Lot 2 has an area of 1.792 acres, and Lot 3 has an area of 1.098 acres. Very truly yours, PETROL STATIONS LTD. Michael E. Gorman LS_;r 5 . ; , .opo �FFO(,YCO� � • Southold Town Board of appeal: MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 2S SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 =mourn _.�„ In_EhIlriniF 15161 Jsslso r. c� rr� }r 2r APPEALS BOARD y'. I r.� C�7 i �� MEMBERS •i """ �� IFRARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN !TI SEP — 61985 CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.SFRO E DOYEN, JR. .`i ROB ROBERT J. DOUGLASS '-- JOSEPH H. SAWICKI r In N.:iC , TO : Southold Town Board and Momk,rs of t: h- Cnnnoitteof Zoning-Master Plan Proposals FROM : Southold Town Board of Appeals' DATE : September 5 , 1985 / SOI�JECT : Re- Zoning Recommendations - Main Road , :,outhuld At a Regular Meeting of the Board of Appeals held Auqu; r. 72 , 1985 , it via ,, the unanimous agreement of the members that '.he � Irip along tho west side of the Main Road in Southold between Tllci;, r , Lallr, and Ack:erly Pond Lane , be re-zoned Residontia ] -Office ( RO ) to aIIow professional or real estate or investment brr,'r :, i . ic.; : ofIher an a principal use or an accessory use , in conjunction with un existing residential use , for the following re ,rsen : : 1 . There are businesses (used in conjunction with or without residential uses ) existing in this vicinity that have been exist- inri , irice prior to the enactment of zoning in 1957 ( and anVther h,Ivinq received a use variance after meeting criteria sot by t"he C4U rt5 ) . Z . Thi• existing structures which are ,ubstantial it si ,ro are more th,rn likely suitable to accommodate an office use in CGHJ unction with the existing single- family residential use . 3 . Allowing a professional or real estate or investment:- type office as an accessory use in conjunction with the present residential use of these structures would encourage au,, thoticaI surroundings . Page 2 - September 5 , 19£35 Subject : Re-Zoning Recommendations 4 . The present zoning district already permits those uses listed in the " RO" district , excepting professional offices as a principal use and business offices , and restaurants . It is also noted that Home Occupations as an accessory use in all the proposed districts , except LIO and LI , includes professional offices , and amends the definition of professional office. to include real estate brokers and similar occupations . Precedents have been set by the Courts and prior Decisions of this board that a real estate broker is not deemed a "professional " , whether it is an accessory use or otherwise . Therefore , the Board of Appeals strongly recommends that a real estate , stockbroker , investment broker , office be limited to be established in areas zoned "RO" , as a principal use or an accessory use in conjunction with the residential use ; and to re-zone to "RO" in Southold , particularly the area between Ackerly Pond Lane and Tuckers Lane along the west side of the Main Road , rather than allowing such as an accessory use within the entire Town of Southold . Thank you for considering our communications in this matter . GERARD P . GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN I • ` QFF81 a PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ` w Z SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ' O� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. '�Ql -_ �� Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 25, 1993 Michael E. Gorman Petrol Stations Ltd. Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Subdivision application for Petrol Stations Ltd, NIS State Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM # 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: The enclosed correspondence is for your information. Sincerely, / Richard G. Ward Chairman y/ SU<cz • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS va 2 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. WardOI Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Richard G. Ward, Chairman and Rs t+1�Js Members of the Planning Board DATE: May 25, 1993 RE: Petrol Stations SCTM # 1000-109-1-23 Thank you for your response of May 5, 1993 regarding the above-named Site. In our review of Same, other questions came up. Your memo indicates that while the residence was not in use at the time the retail antiques shop was converted to a professional office, it was converted to a combination residence and real estate office at some later date. Has the Zoning Board been able to determine whether this conversion occurred before or after the February 23 , 1989 enactment of the new Zoning Code? We are confused about the use of the barn. In the memo, the use of the barn is described as a storage site for antiques owned by the resident of the house. The property owner indicated to us in a letter that the barn was an antiques store. The Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building Inspector in 1993 notes that the building was used as a "seasonal antiques store" . Is the Zoning Board saying that it has determined that there was no commercial use of the barn prior to its conversion to an architect 's office? When the current Zoning Code was drafted, our understanding of the purpose of the Residential Office district was that it would provide for limited non-residential uses along with existing residential uses of existing homes. This seems to have been echoed by the Zoning Board in its September 5, 1985 memorandum, copy attached, in which the ZBA elucidated its position that a • 0 real estate office should be allowed as either a principal or an accessory use in conjunction with the residential use. Also in keeping with this, we understood that the 40, 000 square foot requirement for each additional use applied only to additional uses beyond the existing residence with one accessory Office use. This reasoning was based on the fact that many if not most RO lots are about one acre in size. If the intent was to allow these lots to accomodate both a principal residential use with an accessory office use then it would make sense to require the addition of 40, 000 sq. ft. of land only when the addition of a third use was contemplated. If, however, we are reading the memorandum correctly, the Zoning Board of Appeals has ruled that in the instant case of Petrol Stations, the residential use of a house along with a small real estate office constitutes two principal uses; and that the architect' s office constitutes the third principal use. And, consequently, 120, 000 square feet of land is required. Our confusion about this point is due to the fact that the property owner, in a letter dated April 14, 1993 , a copy of which is attached for your convenience, identifies the residential use of the existing house as a residential apartment. It may be that the property owner or a member of his family resides here and that the real-estate office is a family-run business. However, the May 5th memorandum describes the residence as a rental apartment, which seems to contradict the owner' s assertion. But, perhaps we misunderstood the memorandum? We also would appreciate clarification as to what the Zoning Board is saying here about residential use of a house in the RO district. We are not sure if you are making a distinction between a principal use of a residence as the owner' s dwelling with an accessory family owned real estate office and that of a residence which the owner rents while also continuing to run the real estate business? If the Zoning Board is making that distinction for all RO properties, then we would appreciate knowing, for future reference, what distinguishes an accessory real estate office use from a principal real estate office use in the RO district? Finally, in reference to a question posed in our previous memo, if all or any of these uses existed before the enactment of the 1989 Zoning Code, how do you interpret their non-conforming status? The primary question in our minds is how to accomodate the three uses, density-wise, given what seems to be their non-conforming status. As stated in previous paragraphs of this memo, our understanding of their non-conforming status led us to the conclusion that a sum total of only 80, 000 square feet is needed for the three uses on the site. Your memorandum seems to indicate otherwise. Are we interpreting it accurately? /nS APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS =�o�OSUFFO(,f 400Gy SCOTT L.HARRIS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman o Supervisor H 2 Serge Doyen,Jr. O .F Town Hall, 53095 Main Road James t A.Vil Jr ! P.O. Box 1179 Robert C. Villa y�01 # ��� Southold, New York 11971 Richard C.Wilton Telephone (516)765-1809 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF APPEALS Telephone (516) 765-1800 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Richard G. Ward, Chairman, PB rr k w6i y A'VA i U FROM: Jerry Goehringer, Chairman, ZBA y DATE: May 5, 1993 21 SUBJECT: Petrol Stations Ltd. CTM #1000-109-1-23 Our File No. 3972 Thank you for your memorandum requesting our review and response concerning the above property, its uses, and proposed subdivision proposal. You may recall that we also have an application, which has not been amended by the applicant or his attorney to show the new plan before you. (The building inspector initially issued a Notice of Disapproval in 1990. ) HISTORY OF USE AND PROPERTY SIZE: We would like to note for the record the following information about the buildings and property as existed prior to 1987, and apparently a Pre-C.O. was issued: 1) two-story frame house 2) accessory two-story wood-framed garage (or barn) building used for the storage of antique furniture and similar items by the resident of the house 3) two accessory sheds 4) property size in acres: 5. 836; 5) lot width: 150.30 feet - frontage along the Main Road. PRIOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL Subsequently, during 1986 or 1987, an application was made, we understand, to the Planning Board for site plan approval to convert the garage (barn building) , from antique storage to an architect 's office -- and maps confirmed that the front building was vacant. At the time of the issuance of the Building Permit on December 15, 1987, the front building was not occupied for mixed uses as a real estate appraiser's business and rental -Page' 2 - May 5, 199" . To: Richard G. Wa0, PB Chairman Re: Petrol Stations Ltd. 1000-109-1-23 residential unit. Some time later the front dwelling structure was then occupied for mixed use, not only by a rental apartment unit on the second floor but also for a real estate office. occupancy prior to 1986 on 5 8 acre parcel Principal use: one. A single-family dwelling use. Accessory buildings: three (3 ) which included an accessory use for antiques. No other principal use existed prior to 1986. Occupancies at this time on the 5.8 acre parcel Principal uses: three. 1. Rental residential unit in front building; 2. Separate Architect's Office in barn building; 3 . separate real estate office on first floor in front building. SUBDIVISION APPLICATION The application presently being reviewed by the Planning Board is for a four lot minor subdivision - different from the original filing for a three-lot minor with a different layout. The maps on file previously did not show the converted uses (now occupying the premises) , and the map was amended to show two principal uses: architect's office in rear building and real estate appraisers in front building. The residential rental unit in the front building is noted as the third use although it is not shown on the newest map revised 12/1/92. P.B. QUESTIONS: In answer to both Questions 1 and 2: 1. a variance will be required to consider allowing three principal uses on less than a 120, 000 sq. ft. parcel. Please note that 5.8 acre parcel is proposed with a substantial reduction - and lot area nonconformities will be created. Each principal use in the RO zone requires 40, 000 sq. ft. of land area whether it be nonresidential or residential. A new proposal showing 120,000 sq. ft. of land area for the three principal uses to be continued must reduce the number of lots in this minor subdivision. In any event a variance application will also be required for insufficient width for the rear lots as drawn, and reduced frontage along the Main Road for a new right-of-way from 150.30 feet to 124.85 feet. If we may be assistance in any way, please let us know. ti TOWN OF SO:;TI OLD a ICE OF BUILDING INSpE4 TOWN! IfALL SOUTHOLD, Pl1:11' ]'OI�Ii CERTIFICATE Or OCCUYl1t;CY NONC04NI-OIt11ING Pf2P:AlISES THIS IS TO CTi;Ti1:Y that the LandPre C.O�. Z- 1 5 1 56_ Building(a) Drat•u^ Der-umber 31 , 1966 located at m 23S Main Road Cutchogue , N ,y , Stredt Hamlet shows: on County tax map as District 1000, :auction 199 ;3lpclt 01 Lot 23 doea(not�oorform to the orasent Building ZoneCode of the , Town of Southold for the following reasons; Insufficient front yard sat-backl shod has insufficient side yard sat back. On the basis of information presented to the Building irspoetur,b officu, It has been determined that the above nonconforming r"/Land /Y-t I3ulldinS(y) Use(s) existed on the effective date the present Building Zone, Code of the Town of Southold, and may be continued pursuant to and subject to the appli- cable proviaione of said Code. IT IS FURTHER CXR'I`IF).1.D that, based upon information-presented to the Building Inspector';Office, the occupancy and use for which this Certifi- cate is issued is as follows; Property contaiva 2 story one family , wood framed dwelling ; 2 story shop, wood framed garage ; 2 abode , and ell situated in the 'A' Residdntial Agricultural zone with access to a n Mad ; T state Roa The Certificate is issued to JANE 11ARTS MORRIS 6 A14Y KING (ESTATE OF (stoner, 11531tlSdctdYxi4mtatat)t osoph tta of the aforesaid building, Rawl Suffolk County Department cf Health Approval N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO, N/A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the owner of the above premises It,\5 NOT CONSENTED TO AN INSPECTION of the premises by the Building Inspec- tor to determine if the premises comply with all applicable codes and ordin- ancec, other than the Duilding Zune Cod;:, and therefore, no such inspection has been conducted, This CertifiCLte, therefore, doea not, and les not i:,tended to certify that the promisee comply with all other applicable codus and r4:gula- tionrl. FLMAYij; T:ui:utnT m,pacu>r 4 �►rs Service Stations GOPMAN -PETROL O R O u P Lova Lane,Mgt tituck,N.Y. 11952 S 16- 298-8478 FAX 516-734-5346 DATE: May 3, 1993 TO: Southold Planninq Board FAX: 765-1823 ATTENTION: Melisa FROM: Michael F_. Gorman TOTAL PAGES SENT (INCLUDES THIS PAGE): 3 MESSAGE: Re: Subdivision for Petrol Stations Ltd. at Cutchoore SCTM: loon-1n9-1-23 AttdO'ied are additional oopieo of.the 'Cci:tifiehtes ,¢f Occupancy which were included iii uui letter to your office, dated April 14, 1993. These cupie:s are to replace the copies which your office misplaced. IF ANY PRDOLCM5t PLEASE CALL (516) 298-8478 ^ FOM NO" 4 i- 'DOWN OF SOUTHOLD bU1LDING DEPARTMRNT Office of the 94ildinq inspector . . Town Hail Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No,- Z 22098 Date JANIZARY 11 1993 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ALTERATION LOcation of Property 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUR NRW YORK - Houso No, Street Hamlet County Tax Map Hc;. 1000 Section 109 RtOrk 1 Loi 23 subdivision Filed :dap No. Lot Na. _ __ OOnfQLWA;1 r;ubatantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore fildd lU this Office dated JULY 31L1987 pursuant to which Uuilding permit No. 16675-2 dated D&CEMgLR 'S . +9R7 was iaaued, and conforms to all of the requiramanta of the applicable P"viaians Of the law. Tho occupancy for which this certifiratc. lu iasued is ALTER 5 CONVERT SEASONAL ANTI UE STORE Ito ARCHITECTS OFFICE AS APPLIED FOR. The certificate 19 israuad Lu_ PETROL, STATIONS LTD._ (owners) Of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL- N/A UNDERWiITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N-104736 - NOVEMDrR 27 1989 PLUNDERS CERTIFICATION DATED NJA Bu my A1cNuctor Rev. 1/81 NOT CONSENTED TO AN INSPECTION of the premises Dy the Ilualuing inspec- tor to determine if the premises comply with all applicable codes and ordin- ances, other than the Building Gunu Codu, 'slid therefore, no such inspection has been conducted. This Certificate, therefore, does not, and is r,ot il,tellded to certify that the prumiaes cvrnpiy with all other applicable codas uric! rugula- tions. - i1D1:U1:7f� 1rI5pdClOr .• . .-• 0 S�Ir�F PP; GORMAN -PETROL Ms R o u a Service Stations Love Lane,Mattituck,N.Y. 11952 April 14, 1993 516-298-8478 Planning Board Office Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Richard G. Ward, Chairman Re: Subdivision appication for Petrol Stations Ltd. North side of Main Road, Cutchogue, New York SCTM: 1000-109-1-23 Gentlemen, We are in receipt of your letter dated April 14, 1993 regarding the use of our property. Enclosed is a copy of the latest version (12/1/92) our subdivision map. This map is the seventh revision since we began the subdivision process in the Spring of 1987 and it labels all structures on proposed Lot 4 (this portion of the property is zoned Residential Office RO). The two story frame building is utilized as a real estate office and a residential apartment (this building previously had the same use). The frame building (former barn) is utilized as an architect's office (this building previously was used for the sale of antiques and the recharging of fire extinguishers). The frame shed is utilized for storage and the frame garage is utilized as a residential garage. Enclosed are copies of the Certificates of Occupancy for these buildings. The rear portion of the property (proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3) is vacant, wooded land. This portion of the property was rezoned on January 10, 1989 from "A" Residential- Agricultural 0 minimum size) minimum lot size) whenen lot size) to Low Density Residential R-40 (40,000 s.f. the Town planning board. Our understanding adopted the Master Plan update as prepared by the of the Master Plan is that residential development is this the to be concentrated in the hamlets, and the Town's rezoning of our property confirms ory. Please note that our proposed lots more than conform to all requirements of the R-40 district. Lot 1 has an area of 1.965 acres, Lot 2 has an area of 1.792 acres, and Lot 3 has an area of 1.098 acres. Very truly yours, PETROL STATIONS LTD. Michael E. Gorman f 4 ), 5u8F-i-C GORMAN -PETROL Service Stations) GROUP Love Lane,Mattituck,N.Y. 11952 5 April 14, 1993 16-298-8478 Planning Board Office Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Richard G. Ward, Chairman Re: Subdivision appication for Petrol Stations Ltd. North side of Main Road, Cutebogue, New York SCTM: 1000-109-1-23 Gentlemen, We are in receipt of your letter dated April 14, 1993 regarding the use of our property. Enclosed is a copy of the latest version (12/1/92) our subdivision map. This map is the seventh revision since we began the subdivision process in the Spring of 1987 and it labels all structures on proposed Lot 4 (this portion of the property is zoned Residential Office RO). The two story frame building is utilized as a real estate office and a residential apartment (this building previously had the same use). The frame building (former barn) is utilized as an architect's office (this building previously was used for the sale of antiques and the recharging of fire extinguishers). The frame shed is utilized for storage and the frame garage is utilized as a residential garage. Enclosed are copies of the Certificates of Occupancy for these buildings. The rear portion of the property (proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3) is vacant, wooded land. This portion of the property was rezoned on January 10, 1989 from "A" Residential- Agricultural (80,000 s.f. minimum lot size) to Low Density Residential R-40 (40,000 s.f. minimum lot size) when the Town adopted the Master Plan update as prepared by the planning board. Our understanding of the Master Plan is that residential development is to be concentrated in the hamlets, and the Town's rezoning of our property confirms this theory. Please note that our proposed lots more than conform to all requirements of the R-40 district. Lot 1 has an area of 1.965 acres, Lot 2 has an area of 1.792 acres, and Lot 3 has an area of 1.098 acres. Very truly yours, PETROL STATIONS LTD. Michael E. Gorman APR 16M h�Q�QsuFFo��.coG PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS w 2 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �JQl �QQ� Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (5 I6) 765-1823 TO: Gerard P.Goehringer, Chairman and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Richard G. Ward, Chairman C4/, , RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 DATE: April 29, 1993 The Planning Board is reviewing a subdivision application for the above mentioned property. The proposed subdivision is for four (4) lots on 5. 835 acres. The property is located in both the Residential Office (RO) District and the Low-Density Residential (R-40) District. Proposed Lot Number 4 is 1.098 acres and is located within both of the above mentioned zoning districts. (Approximately 30,000 square feet of the lot is within the RO district and 17,600 square feet of the lot is within the R-40 District. ) All the existing uses are located within the RO zoned portion of the proposed lot. A 1993 , the tfollowing huses texist onpacheproposedeLot of a rNumber 4: a t14, wo story frame building which contains a real estate office and residential apartment, and an accessory two story frame building which is occupied by an architectural firm. The architect' s office has site plan approval from December 14, 1987 when the use changed from a retail antiques store. The Planning Board is interested in your Board's review and response to the following questions: Petrol Stations Ltd. Page 2 April 29, 1993 1. Do the above mentioned possible pre-existing uses constitute multiple uses requiring a lot area greater than 40,000 square feet in area? 2. Can the part of a lot that is located in the R-40 District be included in the area calculations to determine how many uses are allowed on the part of the lot that is within the RO District? Further, since this is an unusual situation, if the applicant combines proposed lots 3 and 4 into one lot, or agrees not to develop Lot Number 3 for the duration that the existing uses remain, could the pre-existing uses be allowed to continue? Encl. • �%%a F0,t PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairmany p4� �0SCOT L.Supervisor ARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P-O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 14, 1993 Michael E. Gorman Petrol Stations Ltd. Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: In order to assure that the Planning Board is proceeding in accordance with the Zoning Code, we would appreciate your confirmation in writing of all the current uses of the property, whether residential or commercial. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman o L, -A PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS t' Z Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 0 SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward 'a1o1AA Mark S. McDonald Y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (5I6) 765-1823 TO: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk FROM: Richard G. Ward. Chairman `{!t/41 RE: Performance Bond Determination for Proposed Subdivision Petrol Stations Ltd. SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 DATE: April 6, 1993 Please schedule the bond estimate for the above mentioned subdivision for todays Town Board meeting. The bond estimate was adopted by the Planning Board on February 8, 1993 and wasrecoscheduledoforethewFebruaryo23th1993mandaMarche9bond 3 Town estimate Board meetings. However, the Board did not take action on the bond estimate at either meeting. The Planning Board has discussed the right-of-way situation With the applicant. The applicant will be constructing a sixteen foot road to Town Specifications along the easterly side of a twenty-five foot right-of-way to provide access to the three proposed interior lots. In addition to planting the row of evergreen trees required by the Planning Board, the applicant is now offering to install a stockade fence on his side of the Property line to screen the proposed road from the adjacent Property. • • lY1S March 3, 1993 Michael E. Gorman Gorman-Petrol Group Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 Gentlemen: Petrol Stations Ltd S,C.T.M, 1000-109-1-23 Route 25, Cutchoaue Case No. 93-5 This is in reference to the site plans for the above noted project which were submitted to this office for review. Prior to the issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. Showing existing utility pole, NYT 484, on plan. If this pole is not relocated, it must be a minimum of 5 '0" behind the face of the proposed curb on radius sections, 210" on tangent sections. Resubmission of revised plans must be identified as revisions and must refer to our case number. Failure to provide this information will delay the processing of your permit. Prior to issuance of a Highway Work Permit you must submit four sets of the revised plans, permit fee, surety bond (sample enclosed) and a completed protective liability insurance form (PERM 17 enclosed) . You must comply with Option A of this form. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York" ) : $550.00 Bond Amount: $5, 000.00 Insurance Fee: $175.00 D - 4 � Mrft Michael E. Gorman Gorman-Petrol Group March 3, 1993 Page 2 Any questions pertaining to the review of this site plan may be directed to Gary Hills at (516) 360-6020. The permit fee and bond questions should be directed to me. Sincerely, VITO F. LENA Regional Permit Engineer cc: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner<-- VFL:GH:JS ,a PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �n Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS-�,a � ��; George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 2, 1993 J. Kevin McLaughlin 1050 Youngs Avenue P.O. Box 1210 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Petrol Stations Ltd. SCTM#1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 1, 1993 . BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of conditional preliminary approval from March 14, 1993 to September 14, 1993 . Conditional preliminary approval was granted on September 14, 1992. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, r� 'e Z�� Richard G. Ward Chairman A PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS F' SCOTT L. HARRIS ti Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman .; ,,. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward - —'la Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk FROM: Melissa Spiro, Planner 01116- RE: Proposed Subdivision Petrol Stations Ltd. Cutchogue SCTM #1000-109-1-23 DATE: February 25, 1993 The following information is in response to the questions raised by the Town Board at the February 23, 1993 work session. The Planning Board is requiring that the proposed 16 foot wide road be located to the east side of the right-of-way in order to provide additional area between the actual road and Barbara Haurus' house. It is possible to construct the road along the easterly side of the right-of-way because the entire right-of-way is located within Lot 4 of the proposed subdivision and because there are no physical impediments to building the road on the east side of the right-of-way. When completed, there will be 14 feet between Barbara Haurus' house and the westerly side of the 16 foot road ( 5 feet on Haurus' property and 9 feet on Petrol Station's property) . A row of evergreen trees will be planted within the 9 feet on the Petrol Station' s property to screen the view of the road from the existing home. Please refer to the following attached material for further information: 1 . A copy of the proposed subdivision map containing miscellaneous notes of clarification; 2 . A copy of the Planning Board' s January 19, 1993 correspondence to J. Kevin McLaughlin in regard to the actual location of the proposed 16 foot wide road; 3. A copy of the Planning Board' s September 14, 1992 resolution granting preliminary approval to the proposed subdivision with certain conditions; 4. A copy of the survey of the property owned by Barbara Haurus. Encls. N 50. 04' 00" E N 47. 2r 50" E 360.89' 'J 11706' 2 10373' / 257.68' - - 2 N/O/F wALEXA NDER N101F ALEXA; S 46. 57' 00" W 165.80' N/0/F MARGA. y -� 4r N P_ `l, o N/O t o $ �\ /F MOMA. _ � u 2 2 L o so a r I m / - „ )Y 58'301, 26s3r \o I—m — Vin;.�. F CYR,2 6•' 1.y o 9 2 N/O/F NEr I rA 31ts1'/ s W 0 `'s $EDGY R BEER � 2 z x o' /Boor � `ARD HAAE O �' a �oEr�1346?, ioc'��,�mgr� „ rED = A o $ AREA !' zavF Ro n t 'E ver grectj a m � _� ni Screen,w� _Q , G y r so � w v o o x set-bQ,-k `�� --,t' 4 Z C- e z 21'�Je� 2 ,Z�j �:{ 11n i !�++ P � ' a V1 f1., awv n `� 2 w � QcceSr *'ER 5 X,s ,NS QCCers ~ Q- "K New gCc25S 1'0 6e- 12 4B6's 560 ° cl "A/N 00' �V" 1.y 284.5)' 15050, PET PDL S; n-TIO NS �QAQ (S R 25) 4� r, roxim r (� �.AL� : � =� �ocn;�ioN pT f � YROn1 �� Profx y �iNE\ hov52 5 1� 16` aogb toccJeA or\ eq5r+ side OT a5 r-o-W to-�qk �is�gn<2 12orv� _ -s _ `l�co5e is �4 �eet•� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �� '`:`y ���� Richard G. Ward , Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 19 , 1993 J. Kevin McLaughlin 1050 Youngs Avenue P.O. Box 1210 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The Planning Board has received the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions, the draft By-Laws for the Homeowners Association and the draft bond estimate for the above mentioned subdivision proposal. The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions and the By-Laws have been forwarded to the Town Attorney for review. You will be notified if the Declaration must be amended. The draft bond estimate has been reviewed and revised by James Richter, Town Engineering Inspector. I have enclosed a copy of the revised bond estimate, which will be reviewed by the Planning Board at our February 8, 1993 meeting. In light of the proximity of the proposed road to existing homes on its west border, the Planning Board wants the road to be located as far to the east side of the right-of-way as possible and in lieu of street trees please plant a row of evergreen trees ( 6' high - 10' center to center) on the west side of the right-of-way in order to screen the view of the road from the existing homes. It is not necessary to change the map to show the above because this screening requirement will be included as a condition of any final approval granted to the subdivision. A Page 2 Petrol Stations Ltd. Please submit evergreen species you would like to utilize for our consideration. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sii�nccerely, R1cha d G�Wardd M Chairman Encl. cc: Michael E. Gorman, Applicant James Richter, Engineering Inspector Barbara Haurus, Owner of adjacent property UFFd1;� o� co PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSZL y c, +- {` "t 1•` SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman i "<. C George Ritchie Latham, Jr. y i'r C Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road � a-�cc.P'r Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 September 15, 1992 Michael E. Gorman Petrol Stations Ltd. Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Subdivision Application for ``- Petrol Stations Ltd. North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, September 14, 1992: The preliminary public hearing, which was held at 7 : 40 P.M. was closed. It was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant preliminary approval on the subdivision map dated January 16, 1992, and the Grading and Drainage plan dated July 12, 1992, with the following conditions of approval: I. All structures located on proposed Lot Number 4 must be accurately located and labeled. 2. A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be submitted containing the following: A. Upon completion of the proposed road, the existing access to the buildings located on proposed Lot Number 4 is to be eliminated. Access to this lot is to be from the proposed road only. B. The vegetated buffer area shown on the subdivision map for Petrol Stations Ltd. , is to remain undisturbed. Maintenance of the natural vegetation (removal of dead or diseased plants) shall be the only activity allowed in the area. Petrol Stations Lt(,- September tySeptember 15, 1992 • Page 2 Failure to submit the final submission within six ( 6) months of the date of conditional preliminary approval shall automatically cancel the conditional preliminary' approval, unless a request for an extension of time is requested, and granted by the Planning Board. The final submission must contain the following: 1. Final subdivision maps revised in accordance with the conditions of preliminary approval and containing a valid stamp of Health Department approval ( Six (6) paper copies will be required as part of the final submission. Two (2) mylars with a valid stamp of Health Department approval will be required prior to any endorsement of the subdivision. ) 2• A draft of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions upon review of the final maps. 3 . A Homeowner's Association must be filed for the road area. A draft of the document must be submitted to the Planning Board for reivew prior to filing. Documentation that the Homeowner' s Association has been recorded must be submitted prior to endorsement of the map by the Chairman. 4. A draft bond estimate for all subdivision improvements. The draft will be reviewed by the Planning Board and the Engineering Inspector. 5. Curb cut approval from the New York State Department of Transportation if such is required for the proposed improvements at the intersection with N.Y. S. Rte. 25 . The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that the subject property does not contain adequate land to fulfill the park and recreation requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. Therefore, a payment of $2, 000. 00 per vacant lot will be required in lieu of land reservation. The final hearing will not be scheduled until items numbered 1 - 5 above are submitted and are accepted by the Planning Board. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, 4Is Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman f r CO Me! , r-1�G•�'�.'.:.^.LJnay Illy',f!Jr lV'�r�'? 4 Q•O � .-.rney°r'e 6ucer,iw1 w ant shalt rpt be cotmMesS copy. 0 GI ~, 3aTrtsis InSeate.!he s::::::rq i Ln / I':.Y r,;na person f°r whc.^11c his LcIsE,o I iamnL Jh n,.J wct trot uiW �' .m IN'utiln°:1i MaLLv;�&l: 1•.. 4"w y FqjehtY. MAP OF PROPERTY o a 1 SURVEYED FOP. { 3 } ";"e i 1 � JOkN H. BARBARA M. HAU�us i o ; o AT T CuTCHOGUE V, y�.\• TOWN OF SOUTHOLDr N.Y. IT 14— l\ r y ✓ ....Y/- U r. 09 „jr $ GALE i i 01 �I '� C 5 25 LnniO „ I f 1J I 'Q V Gueronteed to Security Tirle 6uaran4y 6413 Rn Co. and tc Southold 5avinp Sgnk as surveyed May 17, t961w S. S6. 0o �O.p ,r. . , .o VAN 7UYL SON 1 tiV. AI �7 rr V �� r Oct N (,Z� Licensed Load Surveyors 1 Green�aori , N. Y. i SZ($F"i c.E P P5 M S ✓ _ ArMRNEY AT� 1050 Yoxg. Aye., PO B3c 1210 Sauthold, New York 11971 (51w ' m 765-6085 February 17 , 1993 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Town Hall , 53095 Main Road P .O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd . North side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Gentlemen: I have been advised by my client that he is encountering significant delays in obtaining a curb-cut permit from NYS DOT. Despite the fact that the application was filed in early January, 1993 , no action has been taken to date. As a result, it is anticipated that final curb-cut approval will not be obtained in sufficient time to file for final subdivision approval prior to the expiration of the preliminary approval in mid-March, 1993 . Therefore , request is hereby made for an extension of the preliminary approval . Please advise me of your consent to this extension at your earliest convenience . Very 'tr J . in cLa g in cc : Michael E. Gorman � IBW3 � �i 1yx ��;rra3.�,f PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rj Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ;`�� '_" SCOTT L. HARRIS N Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ' >•� �y,)y Richard G. Ward 8 'ate Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 9, 1993 J. Kevin McLaughlin 1050 Youngs Avenue P.O. Box 1210 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Petrol Stations Ltd. SCTM#1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at the meeting held on Monday, February 8, 1993 . BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the bond estimate dated January 11, 1993, and to recommend same to the Town Board. The bond estimate is in the amount of $45,736 .00, with an inspection fee in the amount of $2,744. 00. As noted in the Planning Board' s correspondence of January 19, 1993, in light of the proximity of the proposed road to existing homes on its west border, the Planning Board wants the road to be located as far to the east side of the right-of-way as possible. Also, in lieu of street trees, please plant a row of evergreen trees ( 6' high -10' center to center) on the west side of the right-of-way in order to screen the view of the road from the existing homes. It is not necessary to change the map to show the above because this screening requirement will be included as a condition of any final approval granted to the .subdivision. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, jL4 d Chairman Ward HS Encl. : Bond estimate �SUtr(71,�o t�J RAYMOND L. JACOBS JA-H'S A. RIC=Za SUPERIN=-M NT OF ENGI`!E3RING EIGari,1Y5 9OI 0� INS7ECT0R 765-3140 763-3070 OF_ICE OF TFE EIG:NE---1 TCIvN OF SOUTEOL7 BOND ESTIMATE FOR PETROL STATIONS LTD. AT CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD _ e... SCTM # 1000-109-01-23 JANUARY 11 , 1993 ITE:"! QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT EXCAVATION & SUB-GRADE: 1 . . 44 ACRE CLEARING & GRUBBING $ 2, 900 . 00 $ 1 , 276 . 00 2 . 322 C. Y. ROUGH GRADING / CUT 6 . 00 1 , 932 . 00 3 . 50 C. Y. FILL - SAND & GRAVEL 2 . 00 100 . 00 4 . 1 , 400 S . Y. FINE GRADING 1 . 50 2 , 100 . 00 DRAINAGE INSTALLATIONS : 5 . 3 EACH LEACHING POOLS 3 , 000 . 00 9 , 000. 00 ( 10 ' Dia. x 12 ' Deep ) 6 . 1 EACH CAST IRON INLET GRATE 300 . 00 300. 00 7 . 20 L. F. 18" Dia. C. M. P. 30 . 00 600 . 00 . 8 . 116 L. F. CONCRETE CURBING 8 . 00 928. 00 SURFACING: 9 . 250 TONS 4- STONE BLEND BASE 25 . 00 6 , 250 . 00 10. 195 TONS ASPHALT BINDER COURSE 40 . 00 7 , 800 . 00 11 . 116 TONS ASPHALT WEARING COURSE 40 . 00 4 , 640 . 00 12. 711 S . Y. TOPSOIL & SEED 5 . 50 3 , 910. 00 13. 20 EACH STREET TREES 200 . 00 4 , 000. 00 14 . 3 EACH STREET SIGNS 200 . 00 600. 00 15 . 8 EACH CONCRETE SURVEY MONUMENTS 100 . 00 800. 00 16 . - MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC - 1 , 500. 00 SUB-TOTAL $ 45 , 736. 00 + 6% ADMINISTRATION FEE 2 , 744 . 00 TOTAL $ 48 , 480. 00 PAGE 1 OF 1 a PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS t �� Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �'j . "��' " ti � - SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 4� �` p Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonaldTown Hall, 53095 Main Road --��z:--" Kenneth L. Edwards - P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 9, 1993 Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Petrol Stations Ltd. SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mrs. Terry: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at the meeting held on Monday, February 8, 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the bond estimate dated January 11, 1993 , and to recommend same to the Town Board. The bond estimate is in the amount of $45,736. 00. with an administration fee in the amount of $2,744. 00. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly ourrs,,?� & 0j Richard a INS Chairman Encl. Bond Estimate �5Urr17(,�-G RAYYCND L. JACOBS curl J2_"zS A. RZCfiT_3 SUPERIN=NDETT OF "' ETGZTEE??VG HIGawAYS INS'ECTOR 763-3140 76-5-3070 OFFICE OF T ENGINEER TCWN OF SOUTdOLD -- BOND ESTIMATE FOR PETROL STATIONS LTD. AT CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCTM # 1000-109-01-23 JANUARY 11 , 1993 IT?:1 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT EXCAVATION & SUB-GRADE: 1 • . 44 ACRE CLEARING & GRUBBING $ 2, 900 . 00 $ 1 , 276 . 00 2 . 322 C. Y. ROUGH GRADING / CUT 6 . 00 1 , 932 . 00 3 • 50 C. Y. FILL - SAND & GRAVEL 2 . 00 100. 00 9 . 1 , 900 S . Y. FINE GRADING 1 . 50 2 , 100 . 00 DRAINAGE INSTALLATIONS • 5• 3 EACH LEACHING POOLS 3 , 000 . 00 ( 10 ' Dia. x 12 ' Deep ) 9= 000. 00 6 • 1 EACH CAST IRON INLET GRATE 300 . 00 7 • 20 L. F. 18 " Dia. C. M. P. 300 . 00 30 . 00 600 . 00 8 • 116 L. F. CONCRETE CURBING 8 . 00 928. 00 SURFACING: 9 • 250 TONS 4 " STONE BLEND BASE 25 . 00 6 , 250 . 00 10. 195 TONS ASPHALT BINDER COURSE 40 . 00 7 , 800. 00 11 . 116 TONS ASPHALT WEARING COURSE 40 . 00 9 , 640 . 00 12, 711 S . Y. TOPSOIL & SEED 13 . 20 EACH STREET TREES 5. 50 3 , 910. 00 14 6 3 EACH STREET SIGNS 200 . 00 4 , 00 . 00 200 . 00 600. 00 16 , 8 EACH CONCRETE SURVEY MONUMENTS 100 . 00 800. 00 MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC - 1 , 500. 00 SUB-TOTAL $ 45, 736. 00 + 6% ADMINISTRATION FEE 2 , 744 . 00 TOTAL $ 48 = 480. 00 PAGE 1 OF 1 oy PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS i} y F nom. SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �d� 4 Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 F.iltllary 1 , 1993 J. Kevin McLaughlin 1050 Youngs Avenue P.O. Box 1210 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The draft Declaration of . Covenants and Restrictions and the draft By- Laws for the Homeowners Association for the above mentioned subdivision have been reviewed by the Town Attorney. The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions is acceptable as drafted and must be filed with the County Clerk. Please submit a copy of the recorded document and note the Liber and Page number of the recorded document on the final subdivision map. In regard to the Homeowners Association, in Article III of the By-laws it is stated that the Association will own the road in addition to maintaining it. This statement contradicts the map which shows each lot owner owning a part of the road. The Board is in favor of each lot owner owning a part of the road. Therefore, the word "own" should be taken out of the By-Laws so that the Homeowners Association will be responsible only for operating and maintaining the road. Documentation that the Homeowners Association has been recorded must be submitted prior to any endorsement of the map by the Chairman. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, , /d.�j l,rG"SIM% f!/ Richard G. Ward Jyts Chairman � gUFF04 eon Gym PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 0 . SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. '0,( ys'b0 Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 19 , 1993 J. Kevin McLaughlin 1050 Youngs Avenue P.O. Box 1210 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The Planning Board has received the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions, the draft By-Laws for the Homeowners Association and the draft bond estimate for the above mentioned subdivision proposal. The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions and the By-Laws have been forwarded to the Town Attorney for review. You will be notified if the Declaration must be amended. The draft bond estimate has been reviewed and revised by James Richter, Town Engineering Inspector. I have enclosed a copy of the revised bond estimate, which will be reviewed by the Planning Board at our February S, 1993 meeting. In light of the proximity of the proposed road to existing homes on its west border, the Planning Board wants the road to be located as far to the east side of the right-of-way as possible and in lieu of street trees please plant a row of evergreen trees ( 6 ' high - 10' center to center) on the west side of the right-of-way in order to screen the view of the road from the existing homes. It is not necessary to change the map to show the above because this screening requirement will be included as a condition of any final approval granted to the subdivision. Page 2 Petrol Stations Ltd. Please submit evergreen species you would like to utilize for our consideration. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Ric�Gr. Wardj/� Chairman Encl. cc: Michael E. Gorman, Applicant James Richter, Engineering Inspector Barbara Haurus, Owner of adjacent property • S\xFFUnit - • SQ66L�E Pa RAYMOND L. JACOBS N Z SUPERINTENDENT OF n JAMES A. RICHTER HIGHWAYS ..j�Ol e. ENGINEERING INSPECTOR 765-3140 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER 765-3070 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD M E M O R A N D U M TO: RICHARD G. WARD - CHAIRMAN, PLANNING BOARD FROM: JAMES A. RICHTER SUBJECT: PETROL STATIONS LTD. - MINOR SUBDIVISION SCTM # 1000-109-01-23 CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. DATE: JANUARY 11, 1993 Enclosed please find a copy of the revised Bond Estimate for the above referenced project. If you have any questions concerning this estimate, please contact my office. ft 1 1 (, o�OSUFFD(,�-�oG RAYMOND L. JACOBS T SUPERINTENDENT OF {� � JA?IES A. RICETZR HIGHWAYS E`iGI`_IE'RLNG rIS?ECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 ' OFFICE OF THEE`IGLVEyR Tcw.N OF SOUTHOLD BOND ESTIMATE FOR PETROL STATIONS LTD. " - - - - •-- -•---- AT CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCTM # 1000-109-01-23 JANUARY 11 , 1993 ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 • 99 ACRE EXCAVATION & SUB-GRADE: CLEARING & GRUBBING $ 2 , 900 . 00 $ 1 , 276. 00 2 . 322 C. Y. ROUGH GRADING / CUT 3 . 50 C. Y. FILL - SAND & GRAVEL 6 . 00 1 , 932 . 00 9 • 1 , 400 S . Y. FINE GRADING 2 . 00 100. 00 1 . 50 2 , 100 . 00 DRAINAGE INSTALLATIONS ' 5 • 3 EACH LEACHING POOLS ( 10 ' Dia , x 12 ' Deep ) 3 , 000. 00 9 , 000 . 00 6 . 1 EACH CAST IRON INLET GRATE 7. 20 L. F. 18 " Dia. C. M. P. 300 . 00 300 . 00 30 . 00 600. 00 8 . 116 L. F. CONCRETE CURBING 8. 00 928. 00 9 • 250 TONS SURFACING:G " STONE BLEND BASE 10 . 195 TONS ASPHALT BINDER COURSE 25. 00 6 . 250. 00 40 . 00 11 , 116 TONS ASPHALT WEARING COURSE 40 . 00 7' 800. 00 9 , 640. 00 12. 711 S . Y. TOPSOIL & SEED 13 . 20 EACH STREET TREES 5. 50 3 , 910. 00 14 . 3 EACH STREET SIGNS 200 . 00 4 ,600. 00 200 . 00 6 15 . 8 EACH 00. 00 16 . CONCRETE SURVEY MONUMENTS 100 . 00 MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION 800 . 00 OF TRAFFIC - 1 , 500. 00 + 6% ADMINISTRATIIONOTALFEE $ 45' 736. 00 2 , 744 . 00 TOTAL $ 48 . 480. 00 PAGE 1 OF 1 w7ri+.F TJAMES A. RICHTER RAYMOND L. JACOBS • ENGINEERING SUPERINTENDENT OF O'�Ol r�O� INSPECTOR HIGHWAYS765-3070 765-3140 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD M E M O R A N D U M TO: RICHARD G. WARD - CHAIRMAN, PLANNING BOARD FROM: JAMES A. RICHTER SUBJECT: PETROL STATIONS LTD. - MINOR SUBDIVISION SCTM # 1000-109-01-23 CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. DATE: JANUARY 11, 1993 Enclosed please find a copy of the revised Bond Estimate for the above referenced project. If you have any questions concerning this estimate, please contact my office. '7T1 i �J(.: JAN 1 2 JAPES A. RICHTER RAYMOND L. JACOBS • ENGINEERING SUPERINTENDENT OF O' INSPECTOR HIGHWAYS 763-3070 763-3140 • OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD l,I BOND ESTIMATE JAN 1 2 FOR ,,r; _ .._._. _ . PETROL STATIONS LTD. AT CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -. -- - SCTM # 1000-109-01-23 JANUARY 11 , 1993 ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT EXCAVATION & SUB-GRADE: 1 . . 44 ACRE CLEARING & GRUBBING $ 2 , 900 . 00 $ 1 , 276. 00 2 . 322 C . Y. ROUGH GRADING / CUT 6 . 00 1 , 932 . 00 3 . 50 C. Y . FILL - SAND & GRAVEL 2 . 00 100. 00 1 . 50 2 , 100 . 00 4 . 1 , 400 S . Y. FINE GRADING DRAINAGE INSTALLATIONS: 5 . 3 EACH LEACHING POOLS 3 , 000 . 00 9 , 000 . 00 ( 10 ' Dia. x 12 ' Deep ) 6 . 1 EACH CAST IRON INLET GRATE 300 . 00 300. 00 7 . 20 L. F. 18" Dia. C.M. P. 30. 00 600 . 00 8 . 116 L. F . CONCRETE CURBING 8 . 00 928 . 00 SURFACING: 9 . 250 TONS 4" STONE BLEND BASE 25. 00 6 , 250 . 00 10 . 195 TONS ASPHALT BINDER COURSE 40 . 00 7 , 800 . 00 11 . 116 TONS ASPHALT WEARING COURSE 40 . 00 4 , 640 . 00 12 . 711 S . Y. TOPSOIL & SEED 5. 50 3 , 910 . 00 13 . 20 EACH STREET TREES 200 . 00 4 , 000 . 00 14 . 3 EACH STREET SIGNS 200 . 00 600 . 00 15 . 8 EACH CONCRETE SURVEY MONUMENTS 100 . 00 800 . 00 16 . - MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC - 1 , 500 . 00 SUB-TOTAL $ 45 , 736 . 00 + 6% ADMINISTRATION FEE 2 , 744 . 00 TOTAL $ 48 . 480 . 00 PAGE 1 OF 1 ot PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �y SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. �l .. ab .Y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward �gr /1�� P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 --�4nugrJ �1 1993 , James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: —Pe�'ro� <Z-:SioNs Tax Map No. : 1000- IoA - 1 - ;Z'3 Street Location: ma;r. 'IRoa & Hamlet Location: C -tc�.oaue. Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated X Other '3e,un Fs+irrw*e (Dated 11. / 9 /9.1 ) Sketch Site Plan I (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Comments- 0 Contact Person: SS A- �P t K o 1 BOND ESTIMATE - TOWN of SOUTHOLD SUBDIVISION MAP FOR PETROL STATIONS LTD. December 9, 1992 Excavation and Sub-grade Preparation: Clearing and Grubbing: .44 acres @ $2900.00 $1276.00 Cut: 322 c.y. @ $1 .25 $402.00 Grading: .44 acres @ $1100.00 $484.00 Re-Handling: 271 c.y. @ $3.00 $813.00 Fill: 51 c.y. @ $3.00 $153.00 Drainage: Leaching Pools: 36 v.f. @ $170.00 $6120.00 Grate: 1 @ $300.00 $300.00 Corrugated Pipe: 20 I.f. @ $15.00 $300.00 Curb ( concrete ): 116 Lf. @ $8.00 $928.00 Paving: 1400 s.y. @ $10.00 $14000.00 Topsoil & Seed Shoulders: 711 s.y. @ $2.00 $1422.00 Street Trees: 20 each @ $250.00 $5000.00 Street Signs: Leach @ $100.00 $100.00 Monuments: 8 @ $100.00 $800.00 SUB-TOTAL $32098.00 Engineering Review Fee ( 3% 1 $815.00 Utilities: Power: 500 I.f. @ $20.60 $10300.00 Transformer: 1 @ $1800 $1800.00 Cable TV: 500 I.f. @ $5.15 $2575.00 SUB-TOTAL $14675.00 ( Utilities ) * Should the applicant submit a written estimate from LILCO, that figure could be used. Inflation and Contingency @ 15% $7150.00 TOTAL $54738.00 Su 6F} LC A7TOORRNEY A y � } C6Xa( 1050 Youngs Ave. , PO Box 1210 7pg X3MV(9[K Southold , New York 11971 1516}(4('2'C11U 765-6085 December 31 , 1992 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold , NY 11971 Re : Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations , Ltd . - North side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Gentlemen: I have enclosed copies of the proposed Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions , proposed By-Laws for the Homeowners Association and draft bond estimate in the above-referenced matter . Please review these enclosures and advise me, at your earliest convenience, as to whether same are satisfactory. My client is in the process of obtaining Health Department and DOT approvals and having the final subdivision maps stamped with such approvals. Thereafter , the final maps will be submitted for your review. Very 1 , J . in M a Encs . cc : Petrol Stations , Ltd . JAN - 5 1 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIO 5 FOR PETROL STATIONS, LTD. This Declaration made the day of , 1993, by Petrol Stations, Ltd . , with offices at Love Lane, Mattituck, New York 11952 (hereinafter referred to as "Declarant" ) WITNESSETH WHEREAS , Declarant is the owner in fee simple of certain premises situate at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, described on the Suffolk County Tax Map as 1000-109 .00- 01 .00-023 .000 and as more fully destcribed in the attached "Schedule All and , WHEREAS , the Southold Town Planning Board, by resolution made on , 1993, granted final subdivision plat approval of the property described in Schedule A, as shown on map of Peconic Surveyors, P.C. dated December , 1992 , and WHEREAS, the final subdivision approval was conditioned upon the filing of certain covenants and restrictions, NOW, THEREFORE, in compliance with the resolution of said Southold Town Planning Board , Declarant herein declares that the land described in Schedule A is held and shall be conveyed subject to the following covenants and restrictions, which shall run with the land: 1 . Upon completion of the proposed road , the existing access to the buildings located on proposed Lot Number 4 is to be eliminated . Access to this lot is to be from the proposed road r • only. 2 . The vegetated buffer area shown on the subdivision map for Petrol Stations, Ltd . , is to remain undisturbed . Maintenance of the natural vegetation (removal of dead or diseased plants ) shall be the only activity allowed in the area. 3 . These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be eptitled' to notice of ,such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the foregoing Declaration has been executed by the Declarant on the day and year first above written. PETROL STATION, LTD. BY: STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On the day of , 1993, before me personally came , to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at , New York; that he is the of Petrol Stations, Ltd . , the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation, and that he signed his name thereto by like order. NOTARY PUBLIC BY-LAWS ` OF F JAN - 5 PETROL STATIONS ^-- HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. A New York Not-for-Profit Corporation ARTICLE I - NAME LOCATION AND PRINCIPAL OFFICE These are the By-Laws of Petrol Stations Homeowners Association, Inc. , hereinafter referred to as the "Association" . The principal office of the Association shall be in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. ARTICLE II - DEFINITIONS The following words when used in these By-Laws shall, unless the context prohibits, have the meanings set forth below: (a) Association" shall mean and refer to Petrol Stations Homeowners Association, Inc. , a New York Not-for-Profit Corporation. (b) "Developer" shall mean and refer to Petrol Stations, Ltd . and its successors and assigns if such successors and assigns should acquire an undeveloped or developed but unsold portion of "The Properties" from the Developer for the purpose of development. (c) "Declaration" shall mean and refer to the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions, applicable to "The Properties" and amendments thereto, if any, in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk, New York. (d) "The Properties" shall mean and refer to all those areas of land described in and subject to the Declaration, and as shown on the subdivision map of Petrol Stations, Ltd. (e) "Lot" shall mean and refer to any plot of land intended and subdivided for business or residential uses shown on the subdivision map of "The Properties" , but shall not include the road areas as set forth on said subdivision map of Petrol Stations, Ltd . (f ) "Member" shall mean and refer to each holder of a membership interest in the Association, as such interest is set forth in Article VI . (g) "Home" shall mean and refer to all units of residential housing situate upon lots on "The Properties" . (h) "Owner" shall mean and refer to the record owner of fee simple title to any lot, including the Developer with respect to an unsold lot. Every lot Owner shall be treated for all purposes as a single owner for each lot held, irrespective of whether such ownership is joint, in common or tenancy by the entirety. where such ownership is joint, in common or tenancy by the entirety, majority vote of such owners shall be necessary to cast any vote to which such owners are entitled. ( i ) "Road Areas" shall mean and refer to certain areas of land other than individual lots as shown on the filed subdivision map and intended for use as means of ingress and egress to the individual lots. (j ) "Development" shall mean the Map of Petrol Stations, Ltd . at Cutchogue, a 4 lot subdivision located along Rt . 25, Cutchogue, New York. ARTICLE III- PURPOSE This Association is formed to own, operate and maintain the Road Areas for the benefit of the Members of the Association and to otherwise act according to the provisions of the Declaration. ARTICLE IV - APPLICABILITY All present and future Members shall be subject to these By- Laws and to the rules and regulations issued by the Association to govern the conduct of its Members. ARTICLE V - USE OF FACILITIES The Road Areas shall be limited to the use of the Members or their families residing in their household, and the Members ' guests. In the event that a Member shall lease or permit another to occupy his Home, however, the lessee or occupant shall be permitted to use the Road Areas, subject to the same restrictions and limitations as said Member . ARTICLE VI - MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHTS Section 1 . Membership. The Association shall have one class of membership interest, as follows: The Owner of each Lot on the Properties shall be a Member whether such ownership is joint, in common or tenancy by the entirety. Each Member is entitled to one vote for each lot in which they hold a membership interest . when more than one person or entity holds such interest in any Lot, the one vote attributable to such Lot shall be exercised as such persons mutually determine but, with the exception of cumulative voting employed in the election of Directors, not more than one vote may be cast with respect to any such Lot . No Member shall split or divide its votes on any motion, resolution or ballot other than in the cumulative voting procedure employed in the election of Directors. ARTICLE VII - QUORUM PROXIES AND WAIVERS Section 1. Quorum. So many Members as shall represent as least 518 of the total authorized votes of all Members present in person or represented by written proxy shall be requisite to and shall constitute a quorum at all meetings of the Association for the transaction of business, except as otherwise provided by Statute, by the Declaration, the Certificate of Incorporation of the Association or by these By-Laws. If, however, such quorum shall not be present or represented at any meeting of the Association, the Members entitled to vote thereat, present in person or represented by written proxy, shall have the power to adjourn the meeting. At least five days' written notice of such adjourned meeting shall be given to all Members. At such adjourned meeting any business may be transacted which might have been transacted at the meeting originally called. At such adjourned meeting, so many members as shall represent at least 33-1/3 of the total authorized votes of all Members shall constitute a quorum. Section 2. Vote Required to Transact Business. When a quorum is pres.ent at any meeting, the vote of a majority of the Members present in person or represented by written proxy shall decide any question brought before such meeting and such vote shall be binding upon all Members, unless the question is on upon which by express provision of the Statue, Declaration, Certificate of Incorporation or of these By-Laws, a different vote is required, .in which case such express provisions shall govern and control the decision of such questions. Section 3. Right to Vote. Members shall be entitled to vote either in person or by proxy at any meeting of the Association. Any such proxy shall only be valid for such meeting or subsequent adjourned meetings thereof. Section 4. All proxies shall be in writing and shall be filed with the Secretary prior to the meeting at which the same are to be used. A notation of such proxies shall be made in the minutes of the meeting. Section 5. Waiver and Consent. Wherever the vote of the membership at a meeting is required or permitted by Statue or by any provision of the Declaration, Certificate of Incorporation or of these By-Laws to be taken in connection with any action of the Association, the meeting and vote of the membership may be dispensed with if all Members who would have been entitled to vote upon the action if such meeting were held, shall consent in writing to such action being taken. Section 6. Place of Meeting. Meetings shall be held at any suitable place convenient to the Members as may be designated by the Board of Directors and designated in the notices of such meetings. Section 7. Annual Meetings. The annual meeting of the membership of the Association shall be held on such date as is fixed by the Board of Directors. At such meetings there shall be elected by ballot of the membership a Board of Directors in accordance with the requirements of _ Article VIII of these By-Laws. The Members may also transact such other business an may properly come before the meeting. Section 8 . Special Meetings. It shall be the duty of the President to call a special meeting of the Association, if so directed by the Board of Directors, or upon the presentation to the Secretary of a petition signed by a majority of the Members. Section 9 . Notice of Meetings. It shall be the duty of the Secretary to mail a notice of each annual or special meeting, stating the purpose thereof as well as the time and place where it is to be held, to each Member at least ten, but not more than thirty, days prior to such meeting . The mailing of a notice in the manner provided in these By-Laws shall be considered notice served . Section 10. Order of Business. The order of business at all meetings shall be as follows : (a) Roll Call (b) Proof of notice of meeting or waiver of notice (c) Reading of minutes of previous meeting (d) Report of Officers (e) Report of COMMITTEES (f ) Appointment of inspectors of election ( in the event there is an election) (g) Election of Directors (in the event there is an election) (h) Unfinished business (i ) New business ARTICLE VIII - BOARD OF DIRECTORS Section 1 . Number and Term. The number of Directors which shall constitute the whole Board shall be three. An initial Board shall be designated by the Developer to serve until the meeting and at all subsequent annual meetings, the Members shall vote for and elect three Directors to serve one-year terms and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. All Directors, other than those the Developer shall have the right to designate, must be either Members of the Association or immediate family members residing in the Member ' s home. Each Director shall be at least nineteen years of age. Section 2 . Cumulative Voting and Right of Developer to Designate Certain Board Members. In an election of Directors, each Member shall be entitled to as many votes as shall equal the number of Directors to be elected and a Member may cast all of such votes for a single Director or may distribute them among two or more Directors as he sees fit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Developer shall have the right to designate two Directors until the second anniversary date of the recording of the Declaration or until 51% of the Lots in the Development are sold, whichever is later. Thereafter, the Developer shall have the right to designate one Director for sa long as it holds at least one membership. The Developer may not cast its vote to elect any Directors in addition to the designated Directors set forth above. 0 Section 3. Vacancy and replacement. If the office of any Director becomes vacant by reason of death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from office or otherwise, a special meeting of Directors duly called for this purpose, shall choose a successor, who shall hold office for the unexpired term in respect of which such vacancy occurred and until his successor is duly elected and qualified . In the event a Director appointed by the Developer resigns, the Developer shall have the right to appoint another Director in his place. Section 4. Removal . Directors may be removed for cause by an affirmative vote of a majority of the Members. No Director, other than a designee of the Developer, shall continue to serve on the Board if, during his term of office, he shall cease to be a Member. Section 5 . Powers. (a) The property and business of the Association shall be managed by its Board of Directors, which may exercise all such powers of the Association and do all such lawful acts and things as are not by statute, Declaration, Certificate of Incorporation or by these By-Laws, directed or required to be exercised or done by the members or Owners personally. These powers shall specifically include, but not be limited to, the following items : 1 . To determine and levy assessments provided for in the Declaration. The Board of Directors may increase the monthly assessments or vote a special assessment in excess of that amount, if required to meet any additional necessary expenses . 2 . To collect, use and expend the assessments. 3 . To maintain the Road Areas, as designated on the subdivision map of Petrol Stations, Ltd . 4. To open bank accounts and borrow money on behalf of the Association and to designate the signatories to such bank accounts . 5. To collect delinquent assessments by suit or otherwise, to abate nuisances and to enjoin or seek damages from Members for violations of the house rules or rules and regulations herein referred to. 6. To make reasonable rules and regulations and to amend same from time to time. Such rules and regulations and amendments thereto shall be binding upon the Members when the Board has approved them in writing and delivered a copy of such rules and all amendments to each Member. Such rules and regulations may, without limiting the foregoing, included reasonable limitations on the use of the Road Areas . 7. To employ workmen, contractors and supervisory personnel, to purchase supplies and equipment, to enter into contracts to provide maintenance and other services and generally to have the power of Directors in connection with the matters hereinabove set forth. 8. To bring and defend actions by or against one or more Members and pertinent to the operation of the Assocation and to assess special assessments to pay the cost of such litigation. 9. To hire a Managing Agent to perform and exercise the powers of the Board of Directors in the management of the Development. (b) The Board of Directors may, by resolution or resolutions, passed by a majority of the whole Board, designate one or more committees, each of such committees to consist of at least three Members, one of whom shall be a Director, which to the extent provided said resolution or resolutions shall have management of the business and affairs to the Associaton and may have power to sign all papers which shall specifically so provide. Such committee or committees shall have such name or names as may be determined from time to time by resolution adopted by the Board of Directors. Committees established by resolution of the Board of Directors shall keep regular minutes of their proceedings and shall report the same to the Board as required. Section 6. Compensation. Directors and officers, as such, shall receive no compensation for their services. Section 7. Meetings. (a) The first meeting of each Board newly elected by the Members shall be held immediately upon adjournment of the meeting at which they were elected, provided a quorum shall then be presnet, or as soon thereafter as may be practicable. The annual meeting of the Board of Director shall be held at the same place as the annual meeting of Association Members and immediately after the adjournment of same, at which time the dates, places and times of regularly scheduled meetings of the Board shall be set. (b) Regularly scheduled meetings of the Board may be held without special notice. (c) Special Meetings of the Board may by called by the President on two days' notice to each Director either personally or by mail or telegram. Special meetings shall be called by the President or Secretary in a like manner and on like notice on the written request of a least two Directors. W At all meetings of the Board, a majority of the Directors shall be necessary and sufficient to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, and an act of a two- thirds majority of the Directors present at any meeting at which there is a quorum shall be the act of the Board of Directors, except as may be otherwise specifically provided by statue or by the Declaration or by these By-Laws . If a quorum shall not be present at any meeting of Directors, the Directors present thereat may adjourn the meeting from time to time, without notice other than announcement at the meeting until a quorum shall be present. (e) Before or at any meeting of the Board of Directors, any Director may, in writing, waive notice of such meeting and such waiver shall be deemed equivalent to the giving of such notice. Attendance by a Director at any meeting of the Board shall be a waiver of notice by him of the time and place thereof. If all the Directors are present at any meeting of the Board, no notice shall be required and any business may be transacted at such meeting. Section 8 . Annual Statement. The Board of Directors shall furnish to all Members and shall present annually (at the annual meeting) and when called for by a vote of the Members at any special meeting of the Members, a full and clear statement of the business conditions and affairs of the Association, including a balance sheet and profit and loss statement regarding any taxable income attributable to the Members and a notice of the holding of the annual meeting of Association members. Section 9. Fidelty Bonds . The Board of Directors may dispense with the requirement that all officers and employees of the Association handling or responsible for Association funds shall furnish adequate fidelity bonds . ARTICLE IX - OFFICERS Section 1 . Elective Officers. The officers of the Association shall be chosen by the Board of Directors and shall be a President and a Secretary-Treasurer. All officers must be either members of the Board of Directors, Members of the Association, or lessees or occupants entitled to the use of the Properties . More than one office may not be held by the same person. Section 2 . Election. The Board of Directors, at its first meeting after each annual meeting of the Association Members, shall elect a President and a Secretary-Treasurer. Only the President must be a member of the Board. Section 3 . Appointive Officers. The Board may appoint such other officers and agents as it shall deem necessary who shall hold their offices for such terms and shall exercise such powers and perform such duties as shall be determined from time to time by the Board . Section 4 . Term. The officers shall serve for a period of one year or until their successors are chosen and qualify in their stead. An officer elected or appointed by the Board of Directors may be removed with or without cause, at any time, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors present at such meeting, provided prior notice was given to all Board members that this item was on the agenda for such meeting. If the office of any officer becomes vacant for any reason, the vacancy shall be filled by the Board of Directors. Section 5 . The President. The President shall be the chief executive officer of the Association; he shall preside at all meetings of the Association Members and the Board of Directors, shall be an ex-officio member of all standing committees, shall have general and active management of the business of the Association, shall see that all orders and resolutions of the Board are carried into effect and shall have such other powers and duties as are usually vested in the office of the President of a corporation organized under the Not-for-Profit Corporation Law of the State of New York. Section 6. The Secretary. The Secretary shall attend all sessions of the Board and all meetings of Association Members and record all votes and the minutes of all proceedings in a book to be kept for that purpose and shall perform like duties for the standing committees when required . He shall give, or cause to be given, notice of all meetings of Association Members and special meetings of the Board of Directors, and shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors or by the President, under whose supervision he shall serve. Section 7 . The Treasurer. The Treasurer shall have the custody of the Association funds and securities and shall keep full and accurate chronological accounts of receipts and disbursements in books belonging to the association including the vouchers for such disbursements, and shall deposit all monies , and other valuable effects in the name and to the credit of the Association in such depositories as may be designated by the Board of Directors. These duties may also be exercised by the Managing Agent , if any, However, such Managing Agent shall not replace the Treasurer. He shall disburse the funds of the Association as he may be ordered by the Board, making proper vouchers for such disbursements and shall render to the President and Directors, at the regular meeting of the Board or whenever they may require it, an account of all his transactions as Treasurer and of the financial condition of the Association. He shall keep detailed financial recors and books of account of the Association, including a separate account for each Member, which among other things, shall contain the amount of each assessment, the date when due, the amount paid thereon and the balance remaining unpaid. Section 9. Agreements, etc. All agreements and other instruments shall be executed by the President or such other person as may by designated by the Board of Directors. ARTICLE X - NOTICES Section 1. Definitions. Whenever under the provisions of the Declaration of of these By-Laws, notice is required to be given to the Board of Directors of to any Director or Association Member, it shall not be sonstrued to mean personal notice; but such notice may be given in writing, by mail, by depositing the same in a post office or letter box in a postpaid sealed wrapper addressed to the Board of Directors, such Director, or Member, such address as appears on the books of the Association. Section 2. Service of Notice - Waiver. Whenever any notice is required to be given under the provisions of the Declaration, or of these By-Laws, a waiver thereof, in writing, signed by the person or persons entitled to such notice, whether before or after the time stated therein, shall be deemed the equivalent thereof. ARTICLE XI - AMENDMENTS TheseBy-Laws may be altered, amended or added to at any duly called meeting of the Association Members provided: (1) that the notice of the meeting shall contain a full statement of the proposed amendment and (2) that the amendment shall be approved by vote of at least sixty-six and two thirds percent (66-2/38) of the Members. No amendment, however, shall affect or impair the validity or 'priority of the Members' interests and the interests of holders of a mortgage encumbering a Member' s Lot. Nor shall any amendment have the effect of infringing upon the Developer's right to make membership in or use of the Association available to purchasers or lessees of the Lots of The Properties. ARTICLE XII - SELLING, LEASING AND GIFTS OF LOTS Section 1. Selling and Leasing Lots. Any Lot may be conveyed or leased by a Member free of any restrictions except that no Member shall convey, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate, sell or lease his Lot unless and until all unpaid Association expenses assessed against .the Lot shall have been paid as directed by the Board of Directors. Such unpaid Association expenses, however may be paid out of the proceeds from the sale of a Lot, or by the Grantee. Any sale or lease of a Lot in violation of this section shall be voidable at the election of the Board of Directors. Upon the written request of a Member of his mortgagee, the Board of its designee shall furnish a written statement of the unpaid charges due from such Member which shall be conclusive evidence of the payment of amounts assessed prior to the date of the statement. A reasonable charge may be made by the Board for the issuance of such statements. The provisions of this section shall not apply to the acquisition of a lot by a mortgagee who shall acquired title to such Lot by fore- closure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure. In such event the unpaid assesseements against the Lot which were assessed and became due prior to the acquisition of title to such Lot by such mortgagee shall be deemed waived by the Association and shall be charged to all other members of the Association as a common expense. Such provisions shall, however, apply to any assessment which are assessed and become due after the acquisition of title to such Lot by the mortgagee and to any purchaser from such mortgagee. Whenever the term "Lot" is referred to in this section, it shall included the Lot, the Member's interest in the Association and the Member' s interest in any Lots acquired by the Association. Section 2. Gifts, etc. Any Member may convey or transfer his Lot by gift during his lifetime or devise his Lot by will or pass the same by intestacy without restriction. ARTICLE XIII - GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1. Fiscal Year. The fiscal year of the Association shall be fixed by resolution of the Board of Directors. Section 2. Seal. The Association seal shall have inscribed thereon the name of the Association and the year of its incorporation under the laws of the State of New York. The seal may be used by causing it or a facsimile thereof to be impressed or affixed or in any manner reproduced. Section 3. Examination fo Books and Records. Each Member, or their respective representatives and frist mortgagees, shall be entitled to a reasonable examination of the books and records of the Association at any time upon reasonable notice to ,its Board of Directors. The Declaration, Certificate of Incorporation and the By-Laws of the Associa- tion shall be available for inspeciton by any Member or first mortgagee at the principal office of the Association. Section 4. Construction. Whenever the masculine singular form of the pronoun is used in these By-Laws, it shall be construed to mean the masculine, feminine or neuter, singular or plural, whenever the context so required. In the case of any conflict between the Certificate of Incorporation and these By-Laws, the Certificate shall control; and in the case of any conflict between the Declaration and these By-Laws', the Declaration shall control. Section 5. Severability. Should any of the Covenants, terms of provisions herein imposed by or become unenforceable at law or in equity, teh remaining provisions of these By-Laws shall , nevertheless, be and remain in full force and effect. The undersigned Directors hereby certify that they have adopted the foregoing By-Laws as the first By-Laws of the Association in accordance with the requirements of the Not-for- Profit Corporation Law. Dated : STEVEN L. MARESCA CONSULTING ENGINEER 188-07 WEST MONTAUK HIGHWAY • HAMPTON BAYS, NY 11946 • (5161 728-9480 • FAX (516) 728-9484 December 17, 1992 J. Kevin McLaughlin 1050 Youngs Ave. P.O. Box 1210 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Petrol Stations Ltd. Dear Mr. McLaughlin: Enclosed please find the bond estimate that you requested for the Petrol Stations Ltd. subdivision. All estimate information was taken from the attached site plan prepared by Peconic Surveyors with the latest revision dated July 12, 1992. Please advise if any furthur information is required by the Town of Southold. Sinc r ly yours, t en L. Maresca P.E. BOND ESTIMATE - TOWN of SOUTHOLD SUBDIVISION MAP FOR PETROL STATIONS LTD. December 9, 1992 Excavation and Sub-grade Preparation: Clearing and Grubbing: .44 acres @ $2900.00 $1276.00 Cut: 322 c.y. @ $1 .25 $402.00 Grading: .44 acres @ $1100.00 $484.00 Re-Handling: 271 c.y. @ $3.00 $813.00 Fill: 51 c.y. @ $3.00 $153.00 Drainage: Leaching Pools: 36 v.f. @ $170.00 $6120.00 Grate: 1 @ $300.00 $300.00 Corrugated Pipe: 20 I.f. @ $15.00 $300.00 Curb ( concrete ): 116 I.f. @ $8.00 $928.00 Paving: 1400 s.y. @ $10.00 $14000.00 Topsoil & Seed Shoulders: 711 s.y. @ $2.00 $1422.00 Street Trees: 20 each @ $250.00 $5000.00 Street Signs: 1 each @ $100.00 $100.00 Monuments: 8 @ $100.00 $800.00 SUB-TOTAL $32098.00 Engineering Review Fee ( 3% ) $815.00 Utilities: Power: 500 I.f. @ $20.60 $10300.00 Transformer: 1 @ $1800 $1800.00 Cable TV: 500 I.f. @ $5.15 $2575,00 SUB-TOTAL $14675.00 ( Utilities ) * Should the applicant submit a written estimate from LILCO, that figure could be used. Inflation and Contingency @ 15% $7150.00 TOTAL $54738.00 � I Sut3�-r�G P8 MS ✓ Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 November 3, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall , 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman RE: Petrol Stations , Ltd. Dear Mr. Orlowski : My name is Barbara Haurus . I have lived at the above address for over 60 years . I have been made aware the Southold Town Planning Board has granted Petrol Stations Ltd. a preliminary approval for a minor subdivision (Suffolk County Tax Map #1000-109-01-23 ) on property which is adjacent to mine. I wish to notify the Planning Board, I strongly object to the proposed layout of the 4 lots. By allowing Petrol Stations, Ltd. to build a roadway adjacent to the easterly side of my property, my property will depreciate in value. I am enclosing a copy of a survey of my property. As you can see the bedroom of my house is only 5 feet from the proposed roadway. If you allow the installation of a roadway next to my house, I will have the nuisance of a roadway 5 feet from my bedroom window. This is not only unfair but will severly depre- ciate the value of my property. You should also be aware lot 4 is misrepresented on the sub- division map. The southerly building used to be a residence and is now occupied by Gorman & Associates as office space. The so called barn is in reality an office of an architectural firm of Samuels & Stellman. Besides the overcrowding of 2 businesses on this lot, you should be aware there is a large black top driveway which is near these 2 business buildings . MW - 6 1992 S��[TI• PLAi•8<; - To The Board of AL,-ears, Town of Southold: a esWe the undersigned do not want an area variance for Lot 4 which 01ot contain the minimum lot area required. Tax map No. 1000- 3 . Owners names : Petrol Stations , Ltd. at Cutchogue. The purpose of zoning is o protec our own from being over developed. to allow the minimum lot size requirment to be down zoned will set a precendent for other developers . To The quote from Southold Town Code , Residential Office (RO) District . a transitionuareaebetween business of the lareO five and loO)deDistrict ist o pro development along ial major roads which will provide nonresidential uses in essentially residentialareas. ? for limited f NaMA Address C IlQ - Joe 14 , , - 13, a , To The Board of AcTeais , Tc,,:n cf Southold : We the undersigned do not want an area variance for Lot 4 which does not contain the minimum lot area required . Tax map No. 1000- 109-01 -23 . Owners ' names : Petrol Stations , Ltd . at Gutchogue . The purpose of zoning is to protect Sur Town from being over developed . to allow the minimum lot size requirment to be down zoned will set a precendent for other developers. To quote from Southold Town Code , Residential Office (RO) District . " The purpose of the Residential Office (RO) District is to provide development a transition area between business areas and low-density residential nonresidential ousesainessentiallyalare rroads hresidewillntidasortunity for limited Name � Address —tel/ o 933 1 Cu. . h 163s' O 5� o -Q req 3 s' _Zd03- via ys L„� GUT iig3s To The 'Board of Ac,eals , icorn ci couthold: '9e the undersigned do not want an area variance for Lot 4 which does not contain the minimum lot area required. Tax map No. 10(;0_ 109-01 -23 . Owners , names : Petrol Stations, Ltd. at Cutchogue. The developed . tosoallow e Of zthe nminimum is to lottsizeotectorequirmentur Town otobben dowov ner zoned will set a precendent for other developers . To quote from Southold Town Code, Residential Office (PO) District . ". The purpose of the Residential Office (RO) District is to provide development a transition area between business areas and low-density residential nonresidential along usesainessentiallyresidential areas .roads ,,will for limited Name 1 Address 9-:K- ' o /3yp a oe D1e 0 To The Board o: A.1- 1 Town of 0outhold: We the undersigned do not want an area variance for Lot 4 which does01ot contain the minimum lot area required . Tax map No. 1000- The3purposers ' names:Of zoning isttolprotectnourLtd. Townafromg tbeineover developed, to allow the minimum lot size requirment to be down zoned will set a precendent for other developers . To quote from Southold Town Code , Residential Office (RO) District . ". The purpose of the Residential 'a transition area between business arewi as Office (RO) District is to provide develoand low-density residential nonresidential along dentialu� major which roads essentially res11 provide opportunity for limited Name Address ... L 700 ------------ b1 . e 1-vck To The Board of Ar eals , Town of Oouthold : We the undersigned do not want an area variance for Lot 4 which d0oesOtot contain the minimum lot area required . Tax map No. 1000- The 3 . Owners names : Petrol Stations, Ltd. at Cutchogue. developed . tosoall we Of zthe nminimum is to lottsize roect orequirmentotour Town frmbben dowov ner zoned will set a precendent for other developers. To quote from Southold Town Code , Residential Office (RO) District . "_ The purpose of the ResidentialOffice (RO) District is to provide a transition area bwill ry etween business areas and low-density residential nonresldentialmentousesainressentiallyroadshresidentialdaroasortunity for limited Name Address s L I re, df Al �/ To The Board of A,Teais , Town 0' )0uthold : We the undersigned do not want an area variance for Lot 4 which doesnot contain the minimum lot area required . Tax map No. 1000- lo9-OThe i -23 . Owners , names : Petrol Stations , Ltd . at Gutchogue. developed. tosallow e Of zthe nminimum is to lottsize roect orequirmentotour Town frmbben dowov ner zoned will set a precendent for other developers . To quote from Southold Town Code , Residential Office (PO) District . " The purpose of the Residential Office (RO) District is to provide development a transition area between business areas and low-density residential along roads which will idas.rtunity for limitednonresidentialuesinessentiallyresidentalare Name Address ------------ To The Board of Ac;eais , Tcrn cL aouthold : We the undersigned do not want an area variance for Lot 4 which does not contain the minimum lot area required . Tax map iLo. 4whi 109-01-23 . Owners ' names: Petrol Stations , Ltd . at Gutchogue . The purpose of zoning is to protect our Town from being over developed . to allow the minimum lot size requirment to be down zoned will set a precendent for other developers . To quote from Southold Town Code , Residential Office (PO) District . " The purpose of the Residential Office (RO) District is to provide development a transition area between business areas and low-density residential along roads which will idas�rtunity for limitednonresidentialuesinessentiallyresidentalare Name 1 Address PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rn Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman p `'; w SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 September 15, 1992 Michael E. Gorman Petrol Stations Ltd. Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, September 14, 1992: The preliminary public hearing, which was held at 7 :40 P.M. was closed. It was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant preliminary approval on the subdivision map dated January 16, 1992, and the Grading and Drainage plan dated July 12, 1992, with the following conditions of approval: 1. All structures located on proposed Lot Number 4 must be accurately located and labeled. 2• A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be submitted containing the following: A. Upon completion of the proposed road, the existing access to the buildings located on proposed Lot Number 4 is to be eliminated. Access to this lot is to be from the proposed road only. B. The vegetated buffer area shown on the subdivision map for Petrol Stations Ltd. , is to remain undisturbed. Maintenance of the natural vegetation (removal of dead or diseased plants) shall be the only activity allowed in the area. Petrol Stations Lt September 15, 19924WPage 2 Failure to submit the final submission within six months of the date of conditional preliminary ( 6) approval shall automatically cancel the conditional preliminary approval, unless a request for an extension of time is requested, and granted by the Planning Board. The final submission must contain the following: 1. Final subdivision maps revised in accordance with the conditions of preliminary approval and containing a valid stamp of Health Department approval (Six ( 6) paper copies will be required as part of the final submission. Two ( 2) mylars with a valid stamp of Health Department approval will be required prior to any endorsement of the subdivision. ) 2• A draft of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions upon review of the final maps. 3 . A Homeowner's Association must be filed for the road area. A draft of the document must be submitted to the Planning Board for reivew prior to filing. Documentation that the Homeowner' s Association has been recorded must be submitted prior to endorsement of the map by the Chairman. 4. A draft bond estimate for all subdivision improvements. The draft will be reviewed by the Planning Board and the Engineering Inspector. 5• Curb cut approval from the New York State Department of Transportation if such is required for the proposed improvements at the intersection with N.Y. S. Rte. 25 . The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that the subject property does not contain adequate land to fulfill the park and recreation requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. Therefore, a payment of $2, 000. 00 per vacant lot will be required in lieu of land reservation. The final hearing will not be scheduled until items numbered 1 - 5 above are submitted and are accepted by the Planning Board. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman LtUAL Notice of Public Hearing STATE OF NEW YORK) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN sMor formerly of Anna Barisk,by Ianc G pursuant to Section 276 of the Tow+now or formerly of Dickey; on the )SS; Law,a public hearing will be held bloomswest by land now or formerly of COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) r the Southold Town Planning Board,aSoPtue Kaloski and by land now or r the Town Hall,Main Road,Southoldformerly of Eugenia B.Kappro �/f yJ /` New York in said Town on the 14,1 7:45 P.M.Preliminary approval for Cil K/1.- (� j1 N L L l of Mattituek, In n day of September 1992 on the ques,the major subdivision for Southold v F—� m tion of the following: Villas,Section Two at Southold,in said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she Is Principal h 7:30P.M. Final approval,for thethe Town ofSouthold,County ofSuf- Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES; a Weekly Newspaper, C minor subdivision for Bergen 1101 folk,and the State of New York.Suf- t lows at Mattituek,Town of Southold folk County Tax Map Number. 1000- published at Mattituek, In the Town of Southold, County of 1 County of Suffolk and the State o 70-1-P/O 6. Suffolk and State of New York and that the Notice of which The property is bordered on the 7:35 P.M. Final approval tort the north by land now or formerly of the annexed is a printed copy,has been regularly published in set off for Edward Rouse at Green- Russell Mann&Joan Mann; on the TA // port,in the Town of Southold.Coun- cast by map of Southold Villas Suf- said Newspaper once each Week for week& ty of Suffolk and the State of New folk County File No.9237; on the Su eS51VBly, commencing on the 3 r� day of York.Suffolk County Tax Map Num- south by land now or formerly of ber.1000-34-3-28. Flower Hill Building Corp; on the The property is bordered on the I west by land now or formerly of Ann LANIE V.BRO'rt.RJ northeast by land now or formerly of Diller Hemblo and Thomas E. Hem- Notary Pul;Uc,Stala of Nes Yak Grathwohl; on the east by land now blo. No.490071E 4 •• ,.., or formerly of Coyle; on the south- Any person desiring to be heard on Olallfiod In Sutbil( cast by Champlin Pis=;on the south- the above matter should appear at the Commbafon Expires Oct.19,1 _ west by Sterling Placa time and place specified. ���/��(/J 7:40 P.M.preliminary approval for Dated:August 28,1992 Principal Clerk the major subdivision for Petrol Su- BY ORDER OF THE tions at Cutchogue,in the Town of SOUTHOLD TOWN . Southold,County of Suffolk and the PLANNING BOARD .State of New York.Suffolk County Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Tax Map Number.1000-109-1-23. Chairman Swom to before me this ; The property is bordered on the 7477-1TS3 northeast by land now or formerly of day of 1g Eugenia B.Kapustka,by land now or r____r.. ..r eL.and.r 7A7,..41 6.• i COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ss: SIAFF OF NEW YORK LEGALS NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV- a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk Comm EN that pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law,a public hear- and that the notice of which the annexed is a printers cop. , ing will be held by the Southold has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Walchm,m Town Planning Board, at the once each week for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .! . . . . . weeks Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 14th day of successively, commencing on the . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . September 1992,on the question of the following: / da of . . ,z E �':hJ . . . . ., 19 7:30 P.M. Final approval for Y—,. the minor subdivisoin for - i. � Bergen Hollows at Mattituck, -- ` Town of Southold, County of _------.__.. Suffolk, and the State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map ton; on the southeast by Main Number 1000-112-1-16.1 Road N.Y.S. RL 25; on the —, The property is bordered on southwest by land now or Sworn to before me this . .' the north and east by land now formerly of H. Haurus; on the or formerly of Joseph Wanat; south by land now or formerly on the south by Bergen Avenue, of Barbara M. Haurus and by `. 19 ���--- and by land now or formerly of land now or formerly of Sidney u William and Ano Entermann; Beebe and Edward Haff;on the on the west by land now or southwest by land now or formerly of William and Ano formerly of Anna Barisk, by Entermann. land now or formerly of Dickey; 7:35 P.M. Final a zt.•..•� �k .�c.' .�- ✓ roval for PP on the northwest by land now or the set off for Edward Rouse at formerly of Sophie Kaloski and Notary Pu b I i c Greenport, in the Town of by land now or formerly of E3AR8`t^;1 A. SCH,dEIDER Southold, County of Suffolk Eugenia B. Kapustka. NOTARY PU4LI%, stlie of f:evi York and the State of New York.Suf- 7:45 P.M. Preliminary p /io. a folk County Tax Map Number proval for the major subdivision Qualified i.. Cou0ty 1000-34-3-28. for Southold Villas,Section Two Coma!-s':jn L;:;Ji us 9/31/9 The property is bordered on at Southold, in the Town of the northeast by land now or Southold, County of Suffolk formerly of Grathwohl; on the and the State of New York.Suf- east by land now or formerly of folk County Tax Map Number Coyle; on the southeast by 1000.70-1-P/0 6. Champlin Place; on the The property is bordered on southwest by Sterling Place. the north by land now or 7:40 P.M. Preliminary ap- formerly of Russell Mann & proval for the major subdivision Joan Mann;on the east by map for. Petrol Stations at Cut- of Southold Villas Suffolk chogue, in the Town of County File No. 9237; on the Southold, County of Suffolk south by land now or formerly and the State of New York.Suf- of Flower Hill Building Corp.; folk County Tax Map Number on the west by land now or 1000-109-1-23. formerly of Ann Diller Hemblo The property is bordered on and Thomas E. Hemblo. the northeast by land now or Any person desiring to be formerly of Eugenia B. heard on the above matter Kapustka, by land now or should appear at the time and formerly of Alexander Zelinski, place above specified. by land now or formerly of Dated: August 28, 1992 Margaret McCaffery, by land BY ORDER OF THE now or formerly of Thomas SOUTHOLD TOWN McCaffery, by land now or PLANNING BOARD formerly of Cyril McCaffrey, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. and by land now or formerly of Chairman Aunes Kuhlman and L.B. Hor- IX-9/3/92(26) $pd COA✓,. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS as ;.,. N SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road <.z d Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 18, 1992 Michael E. Gorman Petrol Stations Ltd. Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision Petrol Stations SCTM#1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 17, 1992 . BE IT RESOLVED the adopt the Engineering Inspector' s Report dated August 10, 1992 . Please note that a firewell is not required for this. subdivision. Street trees will be required as per the specifications in the code. The exact location will be determined at the time of road construction in order to take into consideration any existing trees. It is not necessary to indicate the trees on the map as the number required by code will be included in the bond. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, September 14, 1992 at 7: 40 P.M. for a preliminary public hearing on the maps dated January 16, 1992. Very truly yours, / �t���Iry-a.�r� Bennett Orlowski, Jr: 4s Chairman • �cuFFO1�'�0� � p oFitC RAYMOND L. JACOBS tin T JAMES A. RICHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEERING HIGHWAYS ��rol ��0INSPECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AUGUST 10 , 1992 BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. CHAIRMAN — PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK . 11971 RE: PETROL STATIONS LTD. (MINOR ) MAIN ROAD — CUTCHOGUE SCTM # 1000 — 109 — 01 — 23 DEAR MR. ORLOWSKI : AS PER YOUR REQUEST, I HAVE REVIEWED THE PLAN AND PROFILE DATED 01/14/92 FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED MINOR SUBDIVISION. THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED ARE ADEQUATE AND THE TYPICAL ROAD CROSS SECTION MEETS THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT HIGHWAY SPECIFICATIONS. THE ENTRANCE PLAN AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING APPEARS TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARD STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW CURB CUTS. THIS DRAWING MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE STATE FOR ANY CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS THEY MAY WISH TO INCLUDE IN THIS PROJECT. IT IS ALSO NECESSARY TO OBTAIN A STATE CURB CUT PERMIT BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION STARTS. OTHER ITEMS, SUCH AS FIRE WELLS AND STREET TREES SHOULD BE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AS DIRECTED BY THE PLANNING BOARD. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS REVIEW, PLEASE CONTACT MY OFFICE. Sr N ERELWITER' JAMES A. R.A. cc: RAYMOND L. JACOBS D ( SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS ) FILE rriJu ' O SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD • FOI�-�,G 0 m 5 RAYMOND L. JACOBS Z SUPERINTENDENT OF JAMES A. RICHTER HIGHWAYS ENGINEERING 7 � INSPECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AUGUST 10, 1992 BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 RE: PETROL STATIONS LTD. (MINOR) MAIN ROAD - CUTCHOGUE SCTM N 1000 - 109 - O1 - 23 DEAR MR. ORLOWSKI : AS PER YOUR REQUEST, I HAVE REVIEWED THE PLAN AND PROFILE DATED 01/14/92 FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED MINOR SUBDIVISION. THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED ARE ADEQUATE AND THE TYPICAL ROAD CROSS SECTION MEETS THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT HIGHWAY SPECIFICATIONS. THE ENTRANCE PLAN AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING APPEARS TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARD STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW CURB CUTS. THIS DRAWING MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE STATE FOR ANY CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS THEY MAY WISH TO INCLUDE IN THIS PROJECT. IT IS ALSO NECESSARY TO OBTAIN A STATE CURB CUT PERMIT BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION STARTS. OTHER ITEMS, SUCH AS FIRE WELLS AND STREET TREES SHOULD BE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AS DIRECTED BY THE PLANNING BOARD. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS REVIEW, PLEASE CONTACT MY OFFICE. N RELWIT MHS A. R.A. cc: RAYMOND L. JACOBS 0 (SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS ) f O FILE SOUTHOLDTOWN PLANNING BOARD o�OgUFFF jJf o PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti z i SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman MA S �' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Ju\y Z� 1992 James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: �PLArat o7ei oasts Ltd Tax Map No. : 1000- 04- 1- 23 Street Location: Akka �ivar_ Hamlet Location: S ,-L hoa 4 Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Ma (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Ma (Dated ✓ Road Profiles (Dated 7 / 11, /atm Grading and Draina a Plans (Dated Other (Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated / ) Other (Dated Comments•'-'i 1'e '---ins e EeQr -)o -hkg T{ lckr'r N5 --?1 �ss req mac- caac�v.rt..-....v tNkor,rMtnw� i n e Also, Jn%egsd ro e oe e� Contact Person: 8 �Rp �U"fF9(;�i� �: &a 'ca 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS w t , 177` 2 SCOTT L. HARRIS i, Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman Supervisor Georgie Ritchie Latham. Jr. '%� `' Richard G. Ward j41 � Town Hall. 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone t516t 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 7, 1992 Michael E. Gorman Petrol Stations Ltd. Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on April 6 , 1992: Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, assumes lead agency, and as lead agency, 'makes a determination of non-signifance, and grant a Negative Declaration. The site does not have significant environmental constraints, nor are any significant environmental impacts anticipated as a result of the proposed project. The Planning Board is requiring that a road, built to Town Specifications be constructed for this project. The Planning Board requests a more accurate topographic survey in order to assist in the review of the design and requirements for fill and grading of the road, and especially the proposed cul-de-sac, due to the slope of the terrain in the area. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, J//. alt Encl. Chairman ,1SFFD(;(.co PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSCO Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS O i <- w George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa, Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1939 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-183 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE ATION Notice of Determination Noon-Significance April 6, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 Environmental Quality Review Ac (State t) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning- Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Subdivision for Petrol Stations, Ltd. SCTM#: 1000-109-1-23 Location: North side Main Road, Cutchogue SEQR Status ; Type I ( ) Unlisted ( g) Negative Declaration: Yes No (g ) Description of Action: This major subdivision is for 4 lots on 5. 836 acres located on the north side of Main Road; 264 feet west of Alvah's Lane in Cutchogue. R Page 2 Petrol Stations, Ltd. SEQR Negative Declaration Con't. Reason Supporting This Determination: An environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The proposed project conforms to existing zoning in terms of density, providing lots with an average sizeof well over one acre. A buffer area has been placed on Lot 4 to separate the commercial use area from residential uses to the north. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no' comments or objections from that agency. Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: ( 516) 765-1938 CC: Robert DeLuca, Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Thomas Jorling, DEC Albany ' Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant CRAMER, VO; RHI. &j OCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL_ \ ! NG CONSULTANTS April 2, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board _ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road t— o P.O. Box 1179 I ly �] I7 I Southold, NY 11971 ,{� lJ" – Re. Review of EAF ` Petrol Stations, Ltd. SCTM No. 1000-109-1-23 SOUTHOIA TOY'IN PLANNING BOARD Dear Benny: As per the your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with your correspondence of February 25, 1992. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Environmental and Planning Considerations The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The project involves the proposed subdivision of a 5.835 acre parcel of land into four (4) lots with areas of 1.965 acres, 1.792, 0.980, 1.098 acres. The site is located on the north side of Main Road, beginning 264.57 feet west of Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue, New York. The project is an unlisted action, and a Long EAF has been submitted for review and coordination purposes. The subject site is located in an area where the frontage of the property along Main Road is zoned "RO" (Residential/Office), to a depth of 200 feet. .The balance of the site is zoned R-40, allowing residential dwellings based on a yield of 40,000 square foot lots. The areas north of the site are zoned "A-C" (Agricultural Conservation) district allowing use on 80,000+ square foot lots -- this land is primarily vacant and/or agricultural land. The adjoining lots to the east are homes fronting on Alvah's Lane, within the "R-40" zoning district. The site has existing improvements in the area identified as Lot 4 on the subdivision map. This portion of the site includes a 2-story frame house, currently used as a real estate appraisers office, and a barn building currently used as an architects office. There is a parking area for the office uses, and several small outbuildings in this Firstof the site. Lot 4 includes landscape vegetation in and around buildings, with first growth woods on the rear portion of the site. Lots 1, 2 and 3, are vegetated in Page 1 of 3 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Petrol Stations,Ltd. Review of Long EAF first growth woods, and openings in the locust, maple and cherry canopy have permitted thick undergrowth of vines which makes access throughout the site difficult. The front portion of the site (Lot 4) is predominantly flat with no topographic swales, or depressions present. The topography drops in the rear of the parcel from southeast to northwest. In this area there is an elongated depression which is part of a subtle north-south running swale. There is no evidence that this swale receives a significant amount of area runoff, nor is there any indication of accumulation of water which would change soil character or cause wetlands indicator species to exist. The Suffolk County Soil Survey indicates three soil types on site including, Haven loam near the road,with Riverhead Sandy loam, in the center of the rear part of the site, and Plymouth loamy sand in the northwest portion of the parcel. Haven loam is considered to be prime farmland; however, none of these soils pose a significant constraint to residential use. There is an unclassified intermittent stream shown running through the area of the depression reflected on the survey. The depth to groundwater beneath the site is 8 feet beneath the depression and 18 feet in the area near Main Road. This depth is expected to provide adequate leaching depth for sanitary system installation; however further review will be necessary by the Health Department. There were no significant habitats or threatened, endangered or special concern species observed on site during field inspections. There are no wetlands within or bordering the subject site. The parcel is surrounded by residential and vacant land use to the north, and residential and neighborhood business to the south. The proposed project conforms to existing zoning in terms of density, providing lots with an average size of well over one acre. Although Lot 3 is less than 1 acre it is noted that it is greater than 40,000 square feet, and the remaining lots are substantially oversized. It is noted that access to lots 1, 2 and 3 is from a 25 foot right- of-way on the west side of the parcel. The area of this right-of-way is included the t individual lot areas; therefore, the access will be by easement over Lot 4 (and others). If access is provided as driveways within this right-of-way, which branch off a common drive, no significant environmental impact is expected. If an improved road is constructed including a cul-de-sac and drainage, additional consideration should be 'iven to design, fill, and limits of clearing due to the slope of the terrain in the area identified as cul-de-sac on the subdivision map. A more detailed indication of the type of driveway proposed is necessary for complete evaluation. The proposedproject requires clarification regarding conformance to Suffolk County Department of Health Services density criteria for sanitary systems. Although the overall density appears to conform to the minimum 40,000 square foot lots size required in this Groundwater Management Zone VI, there are two uses on proposed Lot 1. Lot 1 is 1.098 acres, providing an allowable flow of 358 gallons per day. The dwelling contributes 300 gallons per day, allowing only an additional 58 gallons per day for the real estate office and the architects office. The additional commercial flow would cause this lot to exceed the maximum allowable flow; however, the average density is well below the 300 gallons per acre per day limit. From an environmental standpoint, we do not believe that the proposed subdivision would cause excessive nitrogen loading, and we feel that the density is in general CRAMER, VOORHIS, &;ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAlPL1tR7Nll�G CONSULTANTS Page 2of3 �� A✓i77/!T�''�``�a\V Petrol Stations,Ltd. Review of Long EAF conformance to the recommendations of the 208 Study and the intent of Article 6. From a regulatory standpoint, SCDHS will provide the final evaluation under County subdivision review procedures. The site is within the Water Budget area, however, excessive groundwater impacts are not expected. The project is not within an area served by public water therefore, private water supply wells will be used for on-site water supply. The area is not in an area identified as being affected by aldicarb contamination in the North Fork Water Supply Study; however, the area may be or may have been affected by nitrate on of the SCDHS, and potable Supply terlsupplyimustt be prmust beovided n accord with erformed to the 1Article IV of the Sanitary Code. Subdivision approval as well as individual lot approval from SCDHS will be required for water supply and sanitary disposal. 4. Conclusion and Recommendations Based upon the review of the Long EAF Parts I and II, site inspection and documentation noted above, we feel that the site does not have significant environmental constraints, nor is any significant environmental impact anticipated as a result of the proposed project. We do feel that if a subdivision road with a cul-de- sac is to be installed, additional information concerning the design, fill/grading, and limits of clearing should be considered as compared to a more accurate topographic survey prior to issuing a decision on the project. We are in agreement that the proposed buffer area on Lot 4 is benefical in separating the commercial use area from residential uses to the north. In addition, covenants or other appropriate method should be utilized to ensure that the building envelop on Lot 1 avoids the depression area as shown on the subdivision map. If the Planning Board is in agreement, we feel that the Planning Board could appropriately issue a Negative Declaration, not requiring the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement, based upon the reasons noted above. I hope this letter provides the Board with the information needed to continue review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very y arles J. Voorhis, CEP,AICP enc: Part I/II LEAF CRAMER, VOORHIS &' �\SSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL p W,l G CONSULTANTS Page3of3 � All VVI ✓tj GORMAN -PETROL Service Stations GROUP Love Lane, Mattituck,N.Y. 11952 516-298-8478 July 22, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM: 1000-109-1-23 Dear Chairman Orlowski, Enclosed are eight (8) copies of the Plan and Profile 25' Right of Way map for the above minor subdivision. We believe that this new map complies with your latest revision request, that is: 1. The Road Cross Section has been changed to reflect your requirements of a 4" compacted thickness Sub Base of Stone Blend or Crushed Concrete, 2j" thick Asphalt Binder and a 11+1 thick Asphalt Wearing Surface. 2. A more accurate topographic survey has been done to assist you in the review of the design and requirements for fill and grading of the access road, and especially the proposed cul-de-sac, due to the slope of the terrain in the area. 3. The Drainage Calculations have been recalculated using a runoff coefficient of. 1.0. Very truly yours, PETROL STATIONS LTD. �-" / Michael E. Gorman R M cc: J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esquire 15 U JUL 2 3 1992 1 i �► ��gUFFO(� C= r PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS 0 t- n' Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman , f?► � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ��� Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 7 , 1992 Michael E. Gorman Petrol Stations Ltd. Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on April 6, 1992 : Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, assumes lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-signifance, and grant a Negative Declaration. The site does not have significant environmental constraints, nor are any significant environmental impacts anticipated as a result of the proposed project. The Planning Board is requiring that a road, built to Town Specifications be constructed for this project. The Planning Board requests a more accurate topographic survey in order to assist in the review of the design and requirements for fill and grading of the road, and especially the proposed cul-de-sac, due to the slope of the terrain in the area. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Encl. Chairman ��OrI'�y OGy PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS H Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward0'� �a Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 P O Box 1 Main Road 79 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1833 State Environmental Quality Review DECLARATIONNEGATIVE Notice of DeterminattionNonSignificance April 6, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 Environmental Quality Review Act) (State of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency,ill not has determined that the proposed action described below w have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Subdivision for Petrol Stations, Ltd. SCTM# : 1000-109-1-23 Location: North side Main Road, Cutchogue SEQR Status : Type I ( ) Unlisted ( g) Negative Declaration: Yes No (g ) Description of Action: This major subdivision is for 4 lots on 5. 836 acres located on the north side of Main Road; 264 feet west of Alvah's Lane in Cutchogue. Page 2 Petrol Stations, Ltd. SEQR Negative Declaration Con't. Reason Supporting This Determination: An environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The proposed project conforms to existing zoning in terms of density, providing lots with an average sizeof well over one acre. A buffer area has been placed on Lot 4 to separate the commercial use area from residential uses to the north. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: ( 516) 765-1938 cc: Robert DeLuca, Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Thomas Jorling, DEC Albany Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant CRAMER, VRH OCIATES F9 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS April 2, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board _ ry Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 - Southold, NY 11971 Re: Review of EAF APR - 3 1992 Petrol Stations, Ltd. SOUTNOLDTOWN SCTM No. 1000-109-1-23 PLANNING BOARD Dear Benny: As per the your request,we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with your correspondence of February 25, 1992. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Pan I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Environmental and Planning Considerations The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The project involves the proposed subdivision of a 5.835 acre parcel of land into four (4) lots with areas of 1.965 acres, 1.792, 0.980, 1.098 acres. The site is located on the north side of Main Road beginning 264.57 feet west of Alvah's Lane, Cutcho e, New York. The project is an unlisted action, and a Long EAF has been submitted for review and coordination purposes. The subject site is located in an area where the frontage of the property along Main Road is zoned "RO" (Residential/Office), to a depth of 200 feet. The balance of the site is zoned R-40, allowing residential dwellings based on a yield of 40,000 square foot lots. The areas north of the site are zoned "A-C" (Agricultural Conservation) district allowing use on 80,000+ square foot lots -- this land is primarily vacant and/or agricultural land. The adjoining lots to the east are homes fronting on Alvah's Lane,within the "R-40" zoning district. The site has existing improvements in the area identified as Lot 4 on the subdivision map. This portion of the site includes a 2-story frame house, currently used as a real estate appraisers office, and a barn building currently used as an architects office. There is a parking area for the office uses, and several small outbuildings in this portion of the site. Lot 4 includes landscape vegetation in and around buildings,with first growth woods on the rear portion of the site. Lots 1, 2 and 3, are vegetated in Page 1 of 3 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Petrol Stations,Ltd. Review of Long EAF first growth woods, and openings in the locust, maple and cherry canopy have permitted thick undergrowth of vines which makes access throughout the site difficult. The front portion of the site (Lot 4) is predominantly flat with no topographic swales, or depressions present. The topography drops in the rear of the parcel from southeast to northwest. In this area there is an elongated depression which is part of a subtle north-south running swale. There is no evidence that this swale receives a significant amount of area runoff, nor is there any indication of accumulation of water which would change soil character or cause wetlands indicator species to exist. The Suffolk County Soil Survey indicates three soil types on site including, Haven loam near the road, with Riverhead Sandy loam, in the center of the rear part of the site, and Plymouth loamy sand in the northwest portion of the parcel. Haven loam is considered to be prime farmland; however, none of these soils pose a significant constraint to residential use. There is an unclassified intermittent stream shown running through the area of the depression reflected on the survey. The depth to groundwater beneath the site is 8 feet beneath the depression and 18 feet in the area near Main Road. This depth is expected to provide adequate leaching depth for sanitary system installation; however further review will be necessary by the Health Department. There were no significant habitats or threatened, endangered or special concern species observed on site during field inspections. There are no wetlands within or bordering the subject site. The parcel is surrounded by residential and vacant land use to the north, and residential and neighborhood business to the south. The proposed project conforms to existing zoning in terms of density, providing lots with an average size of well over one acre. Although Lot 3 is less than 1 acre it is noted that it is greater than 40,000 square feet, and the remaining lots are substantially oversized. It is noted that access to lots 1, 2 and 3 is from a 25 foot right- of-way on the west side of the parcel. The area of this right-of-way is included in the individual lot areas; therefore, the access will be by easement over Lot 4 (and others). If access is provided as driveways within this right-of-way,which branch off a common drive, no significant environmental impact is expected. If an improved road is constructed including a cul-de-sac and drainage, additional consideration should be liven to design, fill, and limits of clearing due to the slope of the terrain in the area identified as cul-de-sac on the subdivision map. A more detailed indication of the type of driveway proposed is necessary for complete evaluation. The proposed project requires clarification regarding conformance to Suffolk County Department of Health Services density criteria for sanitary systems. Although the overall density appears to conform to the minimum 40,000 square foot lots size reqred in this Groundwater Management Zone VI, there are two uses on proposed Lot 1ui. Lot 1 is 1.098 acres, providing an allowable flow of 358 gallons per day. The dwelling contributes 300 gallons per day, allowing only an additional 58 gallons der day for the real estate office and the architects office. The additional commercial flow would cause this lot to exceed the maximum allowable flow; however, the average density is well below the 300 gallons per acre per day limit. From an environmental standpoint, we do not believe that the proposed subdivision would cause excessive nitrogen loading, and we feel that the density is in general CRAMER, VSOCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Page 2 of Petrol Stations,Ltd. Review of Long EAF conformance to the recommendations of the 208 Study and the intent of Article 6. From a regulatory standpoint, SCDHS will provide the final evaluation under County subdivision review procedures. The site is within the Water Budget area, however, excessive groundwater impacts are not expected. The project is not within an area served by public water therefore, private water supply wells will be used for on-site water supply. The area is not in an area identified as being affected by aldicarb contamination in the North Fork Water Supply Study; however, the area may be or may have been affected by nitrate contamination. Supply well sampling must be performed to the satisfaction of the SCDHS, and potable water supply must be provided in accord with Article IV of the Sanitary Code. Subdivision approval as well as individual lot approval from SCDHS will be required for water supply and sanitary disposal. 4. Conclusion and Recommendations Based upon the review of the Long EAF Parts I and 11, site inspection and documentation noted above, we feel that the site does not have significant environmental constraints, nor is any significant environmental impact anticipated as a result of the proposed project. We do feel that if a subdivision road with a cul-de- sac is to be installed, additional information concerning the design, fill/grading, and limits of clearing should be considered as compared to a more accurate topographic survey prior to issuing a decision on the project. We are in agreement that the proposed buffer area on Lot 4 is benefical in separating the commercial use area from residential uses to the north. In addition, covenants or other appropriate method should be utilized to ensure that the building envelop on Lot 1 avoids the depression area as shown on the subdivision map. If the Planning Board is in agreement, we feel that the Planning Board could appropriately issue a Negative Declaration, not requiring the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement, based upon the reasons noted above. I hope this letter provides the Board with the information needed to continue review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very y arles J. Voorhis, CEP,AICP enc: Part 1/II LEAF CRAMER, VSOCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Page 3of3 14-16-2 (2/87)-7c • 617.21 SEDR Appendix A State Environmental quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FO -� G [ gid] r_. .�M1 Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an o manner, whether atpfdj ct or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not s'� y to n;�y�5. Fri nt- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also uncle y tf41;f`t❑io Jolt�S de' ne significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be to nic Ily expert in enviro me al analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware f th the question of significance. OL@WWrns affect ng PLANNING BOARD The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: Part 1 Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: AA. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important imp t t a arta ewn sl,f—~t impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be p 8 0 * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actio " 11 ons _ Name of Action C> Som W,o L d P\,O� n tot ✓1 -P-)6cu-CA Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency 8 V Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) V� 2 09 2- Date Date 1 ART 1—PROJECT INFOK- ATN Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional( information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Subdivision for Petrol Stations LTD. LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Main Road, Cutchogue, Suffolk County, New York NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Petrol Stations LTD. (516 ) 298-8478 ADDRESS Love Lane, P.O. Box 1445 CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Mattituck NY 1192 NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( 1 ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION - Th� rvo �rd 5e�l�divisioiv Di= �✓ � 35ac�rs i•�ro SctM No . /000 Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ■Commercial ,JOResidential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ■Other Vacant 2. Total acreage of project area: 5.835 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres ,forested acres 3 r05 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) � acresacres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces --O / oC d� acres c10pp acres Other (Indicate type) Lawn ��it7 / .7/(p acres 7I 1. 1 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? V� IC.am 12(S/Cl'�CLtdSgtfDL1 loam-0+ , !1rhovti ' a. Soil drainage: ■Well drained 92 % of site. oM derately well drained % of site ■Poorly drained 8 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Dyes 7No a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) loan oild 2 2. Mow much natural matric , Ock, earth, etc.) will be removed ( :m *site? tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Ayes ❑No ■N/A 1� a. If yes, for what intend purpose is the site being reclaimed? UntJGCA f I n5 r-nCw.TLV(A �5 b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? XYes ❑No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? )QYes ONo 4. low many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? - ----- acres. S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes, ■No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 ----- month ----- year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase ----- monthY ----- ear. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ❑No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ■No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ----- ' ; after project is complete '---- 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ----- 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes I1KNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes NNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Eyes ❑No Type Single Family Septic System 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ®No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain?? Dyes *No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? )'es ■No 5A14 a. If yes, what is the amount per month _ 09_ tons b. If yes, will an existin solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No / ' c. If yes, give name 2/aN0/1Z1_ ; location &Q?/-XV QCL� (,n 4AA6yue d. Will any wastes not o into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes ■No e. If Yes, explain /L6�P l-l'1�/TGQ//-I G5 �� �jja ���l�ys�) aep- 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes MNo a If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes ■No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more. than one hour per day)? Dyes ■No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 'Oyes ■No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Eyes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) Electric, Fuel, Single Family Residence 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes ■No If Yes, explain 4 5. Approximate percentage of prop prc(•t site with slopes: ®0-10% 10 010-15% % 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Oyes ONO 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes l*No 8. What is the depth of the water table? KE (in feet) ,j N e 69 f-o/B " 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes ■No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes ONO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? OYes ■No According to Z2 One- QGGo2p/Nei 7`0 GA-A 5 /7—E Identify each species IA/V,<'yT/y.477/e>; '' 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ❑Yes ■No Describe _ 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes ONO If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes ONO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: 126wd a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name r1017G b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ■Yes ONO a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Eyes ONO b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Eyes ONO 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes ■No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes NNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes ONO B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions as appropriate a.- �Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 5.6 acres initially; dx`x acres ultimately. 51W c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0.2 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ----- (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed O %; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ----- ; proposed ----- g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ----- (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Residential/Office Initially Y Two Family 7cA'ik14pYdcltXX04 Condominium 1 Ultimately 3 1 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. i. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 150 it, 3 25. Approvals Required: • ! e c Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ANO City, Town, Village Planning Board Eyes ONO Subdivision Approval City, Town Zoning Board Dyes ENO City, County Health Department Eyes ONO Sanitary & Drinking Water Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ENO Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ENO State Agencies Dyes ENO Federal Agencies Dyes ENO C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Eyes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ■subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? RO and R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?, One Residential Office and three Single Family Lots w Irk zo/ (.Toecap, Z/z bTz' < 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ----- S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? ------------ C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? EYes ONO 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications /,within a ' mile radius of proposed action? Residential. Offices, and Agricultural Ib NO tR-40 RO & A—C) 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? Eyes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 0.98 acre 4 Z i (?Q'$• 9 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes ENO 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Dyes ENO a. If Yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes ONO 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ENO a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ONO D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the informa ' n provi ed above is true .to the best of my k owledg . Applicant/Sponso e C /Ll)C_ f — Date Signature CS' 7 Title � If the action is in the Coa to Area, and ou are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Pal 3ROJECT IMPACTS AND T 'ReGNITUDE ResponsibilityLead Agen r General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. qModerate 2 g ntial Can Impact Be i IMPACT ON LAND rge Mitigated By 1 . Willthe proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? act Project Change SNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed ❑Yes ❑No 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than El3 feet. ❑ Dyes ❑No • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ 1:13 fee( of existing ground surface. ❑Yes ❑No • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ than one phase or stage. ❑Yes ❑No • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. ❑Yes ❑No • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ • Construction in a designated floodway. Dyes ❑No ❑ • Other impacts 1:1 ❑Yes ❑No❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect tr. _.,,y u,:;que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)YNO DYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 � 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential :,Can Impact Be 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large tigated By (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conserv�ayon Law, ECL) Impact Impact ect Change 19N0 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ANO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? XNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not El ❑ Dyes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveye-)off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ El Yes require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage ❑No facilities. • Other impacts: y ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 6 Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patten , or surface water runoff? Examples DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ [Dyes ❑No 7 C • 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ El Yes []No ` • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. El ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? )INO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered _ species? XNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ than for agricultural purposes. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important ❑Yes ❑No vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land res urces? Examples that would apply to column 2 f O DYES • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) El E3 Yes ❑No 8 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes .❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? NO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? 1lsG`NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register ❑No of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the El El ❑Yes project site. ❑No • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 )(NO DYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. � ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ • Other impacts: ❑Yes ❑No � ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 1 2 IMPACT ONgNSPORT 3 ATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportatloll ?y¢t_ems? Moderate Large Mitigated By NO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of ped(3Ie and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic probleffA ❑ ❑ F-1 Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sour of fuel or energy supply? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family 1:1 Yes []No residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibraQiop as a result of the Proposed Action? - ®NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive 11 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. f • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. El 1:1 Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe y Examples that would apply to column 2 NO DYES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of ❑Yes ❑No accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. '• Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ form ❑Yes ❑No (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ gas or other flammable liquids. 11 Yes ❑No Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ❑Yes ONO waste. e Other impacts: ❑ ❑ e ❑Yes ❑No 10 • � 9 T11Yes IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to mpact Be 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existi community? Moderate Largeated By ApNO OYES Impact Impactt Change Examples that would apply to column 2 /` • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ Project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. E:1s ❑No • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this []Yes ❑No • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans porlgoals. ❑ • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑No 1:1 El ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) El ❑No • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. El ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ El 11 Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ El Yes []No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? OCNO ❑YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) _ 11 . a 25� 4 i/ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman � O �.'A,Z Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. n� Richard G. Ward .,�.'1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road ->„ .. , Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Fe.brugrj 2S 19g2 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine und2r Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3 . Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Tle+rollI-td, SGTm *1 1000 - 109 I - 23 Requested Action: I2siAeAklu` 15U6Awls1'o,'J t'{ 10-(-s oN 5 8 5 4cfes SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( x ) Unlisted Contact Person: McJ1552 Sj ro ( 516 ) -765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental r impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( X ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below) . Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, zw? 4 M Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman n,.-....i Q f: m Southold Town Board *'Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services *NYSDEC - Stony Brook NYSDEC - Albany s Dop, of Djih3 j r WGri<s iT c Ar-my� f Z. IN.Y.S. Dept. of Transportation * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies ' 14-16-2 (2/87)-7c . -' • 617.21 � SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always'easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.` ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important imp tIRt a*a a Wsiroifimpact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be p D Fri;A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actio )' stii— - — Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signeture of Prepawr(lf different from responsible officer) Date 1 ' • PART 1—PROJECT INFOLIMPN Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered. as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiory+� information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. e It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Subdivision for Petrol Stations LTD. LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Main Road, Cutchogue, Suffolk County, New York NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Petrol Stations LTD. (516 ) 298-8478 ADDRESS Love Lane, P.O. Box 1445 CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Mattituck INY 11952 NAME OF OWNER(It different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ) ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial HCommercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ■Other Vacant 2. Total acreage of project area: 5.835 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres ,forested 5. 1 acres 3�_ acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres —�— acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres Other (Indicate type) Lawn acres 0.7 acres 2.8 ---- acres 3. What is predominant soil types) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ®Well drained 92 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site SPoorly drained 8 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group i through 4 of the NYS` Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes 1NNo a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 • 5. rApproximate percentage of prod pro -t site with slopes: X10-10% 10 010-15% - 015% or greater . % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Dyes ENO C� 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes WNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 10-20 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes ®No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes ENO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes ENO According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes !No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes ENO If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes ®No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Eyes ONO a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Eyes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Eyes ONO 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes ENO 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes ENO 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes ENO B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project,(fill in dimensions as appropriate) a,``Fotal contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 5.6 acres initially; ----- acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0.2 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ----- (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ----- proposed ----- g. Maximum vehicular trips generate(] per hour ----- (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: Residential/Office One Family Two Family 7vX.udXi)4X(XXXMD4l� Condominium Initially 1 Ultimately 3 1 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 150 ft. 3 2. How much natural mataN., . (• rock, earth, etc.) will be removed 4-MO site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Dyes ❑No ■N/A a. If yes, for what intend_ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ❑No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ----- acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes ®No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 ----- month ----- year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase ----- month ---- - year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ❑No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes ■No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ----- after project is complete ----- 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ----- 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes QNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ®No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes ❑No Type Single Family Septic System 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ®No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes QNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes ®No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ❑No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ®No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes MNo n a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month- b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes 0No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes !!No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes ■No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Dyes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) Electric, Fuel, Single Family Residence 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes NNo If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: • y� 40p, Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes J§No City, Town, Village Planning Board Byes ❑No Subdivision Approval { ` City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes !No City, County Health Department 9Yes ❑No Sanitary & Drinking Water Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ■No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ■No State Agencies ❑Yes ®No Federal Agencies ❑Yes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? MYes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit !subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? RO and R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? One Residential Office and three Single Family Lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ----- 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? ------------ C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ayes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/ mile radius of proposed action? Residential Offices and Agricultural R-40 RO & A-C) 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a Y mile? Eyes ❑No 9. if the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 0.98 acre 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ■No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Dyes ■No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes ■No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which You propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification certify that the informa n provi cd above is trueto the best of my knowledg . Applicant/Spon e ( y 5?---�T/��✓S' L ( -� L Signature '� / Date /— ), ,) Title 'C fZ(`S7 If the action is in the Coa to Arca, and ou are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Par ROJECT IMPACTS AND TT'rl fGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 2 3 �. Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 El 13 ❑Yes -]No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ E3 Yes []No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there bean effect h. ,,y u;;,que or unusual land forms found on _ the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)L]NO OYES _ • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 6 ' • C 1 2 g IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) Impact Impact Project Change t Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ 13 Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ supply system. ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ • Liquid effluent will be convey-.:..]off the site to facilities which presently ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ day. Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of Petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ products &,eater than 1,100 gallons. ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in'areas without water and/or sewer services. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action loca,es commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage []Yes ❑No facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No ( 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface (` water runoff? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 7 C • ' � 2 3 II to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodwa ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No y' ❑ ❑ • Other impacts: El Yes []No❑ ❑ El Yes ONO IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ hour. Dyes []No • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ refuse per hour. ❑ 11 Yes ❑No • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. ❑ []Yes ONO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed El ❑ to industrial use. Dyes []No • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ development within existing industrial areas. ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ❑Yes ❑No • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑Yes ONO than for agricultural purposes. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ❑ []Yes ONO • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ Of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important El ❑Yes ONO vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? Examples that would a > Aumn ONO DYES • The proposed action would sever,cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ AL land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) El El Yes []No 8 Small to PotentialFCannmpact Be Moderate Largegated By Impact Impact Project Change C • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of 13 Dyes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAE Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any.,impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ Dyes [--]No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO OYES ilr • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ 0 • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. El El Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 9 IMPACT ONOANSPORTATION 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ONO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ C-1 Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ Cl any form of energy in the municipality. [:]Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ transmission or s PP IY system stem to serve more than 50 single or two family ❑Yes 1-1 No residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? - ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ Cl E3 Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ noise screen. 11 Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of Dyes ❑No accident or upset conditions, or there may be a.chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ form ❑Yes ❑No (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ gas or other flammable liquids. ❑Y15 ❑No • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ❑Yes ONO waste. • Other impacts: LLJ_L] ❑Yes ❑No 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER !in 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to mpact Be 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Moderate Largeated By CONO ❑YES Impact Impactt Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. ❑ ❑No • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans portgoals. • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existingfacilities ❑ Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community.facilities, ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. 11 ❑yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impacts) is considered to be potentially large, even if the im mitigated. pacts) may be Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by Project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurri • The duration of the impact ng • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objectiuns to the project relate to thi, impact. (Continue on attachments) - 11 :. . 14.14-11 (2187)_q, 617.21 Appendix B • SEQR Pate Environmental Quality Review �>( Visual FAF Addendum F rm may be used to provide additional information relating to Question I I of Part 2 of F. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between I. Would the project be visible from: Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-'/4 114-112 11,-3 3.5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation ❑ ❑ ❑ Cl ❑ of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural C] ❑ ❑ ❑ or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State Parks? • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? El ❑ ❑ El El National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding El ❑ E] ❑ natural features? ElEl ❑ • National Park Service lands? • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic El ❑ El ❑ ❑ or Recreational? C1 ED ❑ ❑ • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? El ❑ ❑ EJ • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for ❑ ❑ establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ scenic? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Municipal park, or designated open space? • C El ❑ El El Elounty road? • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) Oyes ❑No ( 3. Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ❑No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXI G VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *'A mile *1 mile r Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ Agricultural ❑ O Suburban residential El Industrial El ❑ Commercial E] River, ❑ ElRiver, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed ❑ ❑ 5. Are there visually similar projects within: "/2 mile El Yes F-1 No '1 miles ❑Yes ❑No '2 miles ❑Yes []No '3 miles ❑Yes ❑Na f ' Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. ` EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Activity Holidays/ Travel to and from work Day W e ly Weekends Seasonally Invoived in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 U OZ 9V C= , g 4 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS c�a Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. S Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 25, 1992 Michael E. Gorman Petrol Stations Ltd. Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision of Petrol Stations Ltd. Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Gorman: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 24 , 1992 . BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the Engineering Inspector' s report dated February 20, 1992. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr!( °M$ Chairman Encl. { - - o�OSUfFO(,f-�D ti� G sPLANNING BOARD MEMBERS coy Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O • SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 'p�O� �aO� Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (5 I6) 765-1823 February 25, 1992 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Petrol Stations Ltd. SCTM#1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. The planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on February 24, 1992. The $400.00 review fee has been submitted by the applicant. If all is in order, the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the April 6th public meeting. Please submit your report no later than March 30th in order for the Board to review your report before the meeting date. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. If there are any questions, please contact this office. Very truly yours, r Djaw'04 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. � ^"5 Chairman Encl. DIF« RAYMOND L. JACOBS Ln o ' SUPERINTENDE`IT OFA ® � JAMES A. RICHTER HIGHWAYS q !. ENGINEERING 765-3140 INSPECTOR OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER 765-3070 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FEBRUARY 20, 1992 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Re: PETROL STATIONS LTD. (MINOR SUBDIVISION) RTE. 25 - CUTCHOGUE SCTM # 1000 - 109 - 01 - 23 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, I have reviewed the preliminary Plans that were submitted for the above referenced subdivision. The following is a list of my comments: 1. A State Curb Cut Permit is required. 2. The Town Specification gives a runoff coefficient for paved surfaces a value of 1.0. A value of 0.9 was used in the Drainage Calculations. However, sufficient areas were used in the calculations for potential runoff which make the Design of 3 - 10' dia. x 10' deep leaching pools adequate. - 3. Road Cross Section: The typical section shown on the drawing does not meet Town Specifications for Minor Subdivisions. This section of the code was updated on 11/27/90 and it requires a 4" compacted thickness Sub Base of Stone Blend or Crushed Concrete 2' " thick Asphalt Binder and a 1`z" thick Asphalt Wearing Surface. The Wearing Surface can be substituted by a Double Course of Bituminous Surface Treatment ( Oil & Stone) , If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact my office. S ' i erely, ames A. chter, A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs file FI. pUIRDTOW,N 80ARn i PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS c�i� • a _� Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor'-�� `� Z '\�, Richard G. Ward `` ( ' ��'` ' Mark S. McDonald �� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Fax (5 I6) 765-1823 October 22, 1991 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Major Subdivision of Petrol Stations, Ltd. Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The f by the win Town PlanningoBoardratoa meetingsheldyOndopted Monday, OctoberSouthold 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the maps dated June 28, 1991 with the following condition: 1• The building envelope for Lot 2 is to be revised so that it is at least 175 ' in width at the building line (see enclosed sketch for clarification) . Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of preliminary maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The preliminary submission must include road profiles and drainage plans. These maps will be forwarded by the Planning Board to the Engineer for review. The Planning Board is requiring that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions be filed stating that: Page 2 Petrol Stations Ltd. 1. The vegetated buffer area is to remain undisturbed. Maintenance of natural vegetation (e.g. removal of dead or diseased plants) shall be the only activity allowed in the area. This covenant is also to be noted on the map. Please note the Planning Board hwill prefer submission thissubdivisionrto�theaSuffolk� County Planning Commission for their review. notified should any additional covenants and rYou will be estrictions be required. For that reason, a draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions should be submitted after the Planning Board has reviewed the preliminary maps. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours,/ Bennett Orlowski, JY, ns Chairman w <0 vel N/O/F SOP"IF KAL OSK/ N/O/F EUGENIA N 50' OI' OO" E / 4.Q2 2 109?9' / 360.8g' N 7 2r 30" E W 757 Be, 117.08' O � N OL z (7 T� S q' 57' OO" w 165,80' �J y [' -1.. 10 lb 4k O o' L— ► --F, —1 74 / m �. � OT 9 v .i- O G y moo. 50 � O w u;y �O olp ¢FOw ROFY BFFBF 32 s7'/ s6 00, c� AH z w FF I a' a yEC1ErA13g8?, �Opr OTq 'Ww QAM y o r � n S, 58 1, RQA�)so w r0 SHO 9J 10 25 'n i 14-16-2 (2/87)-7c 617.21 SEOR Appendix A State Environmental quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always'easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important imptJ [ a ae si if t impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be p 8 * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actio �� Name of Action I Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency b Y Title of Responsible Officer ` Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFOh..r. MON Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Subdivision for Petrol Stations LTD. LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Main Road, Cutchogue, Suffolk County, New York NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Petrol Stations LTD. (516 ) 298-8478 ADDRESS Love Lane, P.O. Box 1445 STATE ZIP CODE CITYIPO NY 11952 Mattituck BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER(If different) l ) ADDRESS STATE ZIP CODE CITYIPO DESCRIPTION OF ACTION ]/ Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ■Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ■Other Vacant 2. Total acreage of project area: 5.835 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres 5. 1 acres 3 acres ,forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated'(Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) Lawn 0.7 acres 2.8 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ■Well drained 92 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site ■Poorly drained 8 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes INNO a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5. Approximate Percentage of propose#rc-t site with slopes: N0-10% 104- , ❑10-15% 015% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Oyes NNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? 10-20 (in feet) Dyes *No 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes ■No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [-]Yes ■No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes ■No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ❑Yes ■No Describe 13. Is the project site Presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes ■No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes ■No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name 17. Is the site served by existin b. Size (In acres) g public utilities? ■Yes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Eyes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ®Yes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes ■No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Oyes ■No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes ENo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. 'Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0 b. Project acreage to be developed: 5.6 acres. p acres initially; ----- c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0.2 acres. acres ultimately. d. Length of project, in miles: ----- (If appropriate) e. If the Project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ----- : Proposed ----- g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour -- (upon . completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Famil Residential./Office Initially —_ y Yv.Wk1G)4 RXDttXl7y Condominium Ultimately 3 . 1 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 150 ft. 3 2. How much natural maX . ,..e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed l,n, the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Dyes ONO ■N/A a. If yes, for what intend_- purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? • ----- acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 1bo years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes ONO 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 ----- month "--' year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase ----- month ----- year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes ENO 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ----- after project is compete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project "'-- 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes RNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ENO a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes ONO Type Single Family Septic System 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ANO Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes ENO a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ONO c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ONO e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes ■No S. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes ■No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes ONO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes ■No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Eyes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) Electric Fuel Single Family Residence 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallonsiday, 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes ONO If Yes, explain 4 15. Approvals Required: sr Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes II/No City, Town, Village Planning Board 9Yes ❑No Subdivision Approval City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ■No City, County Health Department {l Yes ❑No _ Sanitary & Drinking Water Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ■No Other Regional Agencies Dyes ■No State Agencies ❑Yes ■No Federal Agencies ❑Yes ■No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Eyes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ■subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? RO and R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? One Residential Office and three Single Family Lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ----- 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? ------------ C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Byes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/ mile radius of proposed action? Residential Offices and Agricultural (R-40 RO & A—O 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? Eyes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 0.98 acre 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes ■No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Dyes ■No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ■No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification certify that the informa n provi ed above is true to the best of my knowledg . Applicant/Sponso ' e Signature f Title Date � � iLC S' If the action is in the Coa to Arca, and ou are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before with this assessment. proceeding 5 Parte' PROJECT IMPACTS AND TI-f-- MAGNITUDE l Responsibility of Lead Agen2r General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be L Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more E-1 El Dyes El No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ El Yes F-1 No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0N 2. Will there be an effect t.. ...ry un,que or unusual land forms found on c the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO DYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By .� (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO OYES • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. 1:1• Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑Yes ONO protected stream. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. El 11 Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 13 Yes ONO ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. ❑ ❑Yes []No • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. 13• Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ E-1 Yes ONO 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not 11 ❑ Dyes ONO ❑ 11 ❑Yes ONO have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ gallons per minute pumping capacity. ❑ EJ Yes []No • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ supply system. ❑ []Yes ONO • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. El• Liquid effluent will be convey-,.)off the site to facilities which presently El El E]Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. El ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual ❑ C1 Yes ❑No contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage ❑ ❑Yes ONO facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or water runoff? g Patterns, or surface Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO OYES • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ 7 Dyes ❑No 1 2kYes Small to Potential Be Moderate Large y Impact Impact nge • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0N • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 =LargeMitigated Small toBe ModerateyImpactge • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ agricultural land. ❑ El Yes ❑No • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than 2.5 acres of agricultural land • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, ❑Yes No strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether F-1 []Yes ❑No man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their El El Yes ❑No enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. ❑ El Yes []No Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. 1:1 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes []No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational ONO DYES • A major reduction of an open space important tothecoummunity. ❑nity. EJ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ Dyes ❑No ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 9 ` 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Impact Impact Project Change ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑Yes ED No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ El [--]Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. El El ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? - ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive 11 11 ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local 1111 Oyes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a F-1F-1 []Yes ❑No noise screen. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ❑NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any El ❑ E--]Yes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ El Dyes ONO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER MOYes 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to mpact Be 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Moderate Largegated By ❑NO DYES Impact Impactt Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. s ❑No • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ will increase by more than 5% ❑No per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑No ❑ ❑ El Yes ONO or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ONO 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impacts) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 1414.11 (2!87)_9, 617.21 SEAR Appendix B SIL to Environmental Quality Review Visual FAF Addendum FFull ay be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of (To be completed by LeadAgency) Distance Between Project and Resource (in Miles) I. Would the project be visible from: 0-1/4 1/4-1/2 Y2-3 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation ❑ of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ EJ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural ❑ or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? EJ • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ El • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding El El ❑ ❑ natural features? ❑ • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ E] ❑ ❑ or Recreational? ❑ ❑ • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? 1:1 C] • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for ❑ ❑ establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ scenic? ❑ ❑ ❑ • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ E3❑ • County road? ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes ❑No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time during which the project will be visible? of year ❑Yes ❑No 1 rDESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT om each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding vironment. Within *1/4 mile *1 milentially undeveloped � ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: 'Ih mile ❑Yes El No *1 miles ❑Yes ❑No *2 miles ❑Yes El No f '3 miles ❑Yes El No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work El ❑ ❑ El F-1 El ❑ El in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents El ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ F-1 Other 2 14-16-2 (2/87)-7c • 617.21 SEAR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always'easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions [identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part3 on review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supportingormation, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the d agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important imp B t t `� eWsiJif on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be p 1S' impact ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actio j JAN 2 fg9? - Pte+-►-. i s-�-F�o;,� ` ,c - _ . ; Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency g y Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFOK..,ATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiori information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on, information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Subdivision for Petrol Stations LTD. LOCATION OF ACTION(include Street Address, Municipality and County) Main Road, Cutchogue, Suffolk County, New YorEE]Ek BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR (516 ) 298-8478 Petrol Stations LTD. ADDRESS Love Lane, P.O. Box 1445 STATE ZIP CODE CITYIPO NY 11952 Mattituck BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER(If different) ( 1 ADDRESS STATE ZIP CODE CITY/PO DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: []Urban ❑Industrial BCommercial D Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ■Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 5.835 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 3 acres 5. 1 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 2.8 acres Other (Indicate type) Lawn 0.7 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ■Well drained 92 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site ■Poorly drained 8 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS. Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes ONO a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed pr#site with slopes: ®0-10% 10 ❑10-15% Ill 5% or greater T % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes ■No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes *No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 10-20 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes !No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes ■No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes ■No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Ll Yes ■No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? 1-1 Yes ■No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [I Yes ■No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Eyes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ■Yes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ■Yes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes ■No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? EJ Yes ■No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes ■No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project,(fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 5.6 acres initially; ----- acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0.2 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ----- (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ----- Pro -- proposed %/ P --- g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ----- (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two FamilyResidX"moYdtRX/Office Initially � Condominium 1 Ultimately 3 1 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 150 ft. 3 2. How much natural matt. . (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed . ,n the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ❑No ■N/A a. If yes, for what intend— purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ' --'-- acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 1bo years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yea ■No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 ---'– month ----- year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase ----- month '--'– year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ❑No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ■No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction "--- after project is compete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ----- 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes !No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ■No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ■Yes ❑No Type Single Family Septic System 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ONO Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes •No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes ■No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ■No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ONO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes ■No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes ■No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes ■No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ■Yes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) Electric Fuel Single Family Residence 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. L 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallons/day. C 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes ■No If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: • Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes MNo City, Town, Village Planning Board @Yes ❑No Subdivision Approval City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ■No City, County Health Department Eyes ❑No Sanitary & Drinking Water Other Local Agencies Dyes ■No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ■No State Agencies ❑Yes ■No Federal Agencies ❑Yes ■No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ■Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ■subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? RO and R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? One Residential Office and three Single Family Lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ----- 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? ------------ C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 1Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/ mile radius of proposed action? Residential Offices and Agricultural R-40 RO & A-C 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/. mile? ■Yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 0.98 acre 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes /No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ❑Yes ■No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes ■No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the informa n provi d above is tru to the best of my k owledg . Applicant/Sponso e C KOL7.Q7/©�/S Signature e Date Title If the action is in the Co to Area, and ou are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Par+--"—PROJECT IMPACTS AND TH`rl MAGNITUDE_ Responsibility of Lead AgenLy General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be i Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ❑NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ El Dyes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than El 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. ❑Yes [:]No Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ than one phase or stage. F-1 ❑Yes ❑No • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 2. Will there be an effect t*. _..ry u;:,que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO DYES • E-1 Dyes ❑No Specific land forms: ❑ 6 1 2JE IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Be 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large y (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) Impact Impact nge Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ Yeso protected stream. ❑ ❑ Elo • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ Elo • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. ❑ ❑Yes []No • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not El ❑ El Yes ONO have approval to serve proposed (project) action. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ gallons per minute pumping capacity. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ supply system. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. • Liquid effluent will be convey-.I off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO do not exist or have inadequate capacity. ❑ El Yes ONO • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ day. ❑ []Yes ONO • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual EJ ❑ Dyes ❑No contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in'areas without water and/or sewer services. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or g patterns, or surface water runoff? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 El ❑ Dyes ONO 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. E-1 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. El EJ ❑Yes 11 No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. 11 El ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ hour. ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of El refuse per hour. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. ❑ Oyes ONO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ to industrial use. El ❑Yes ONO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ development within existing industrial areas. ❑ ❑ Eyes ONO • Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered DYES species? Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal EJ ❑ ❑Yes ONO list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ❑ Dyes ONO • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ Eyes ONO • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ than for agricultural purposes. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 E-1 Dyes ONO • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ Dyes ONO • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural El land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ agricultural land. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than 2.5 acres of agricultural land • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, ❑ ❑Yes ❑No strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their El ❑ E]Yes ❑No enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register ❑ Dyes ❑No of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity.DYES ~ ❑ ❑ • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑Yes E]No • Other impacts: ❑ Dyes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 pModerate 2pimpactIMPACT ON TRANSPORTATIONPotential Large 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation sy❑NO? ❑YESImpact Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people andlor goods. �❑ ❑Yes No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 1s. Will proposed action affect the community's sources f fuel or NO EYES energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 El ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of 11 any form of energy in the municipality. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result EYES of the Proposed Action? Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ ❑Yes []No • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ facility. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). El Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local El ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. El ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ noise screen. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ❑NO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. El ❑ []Yes ❑No • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) ❑ ❑Yes []No • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ gas or other flammable liquids. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER rE 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Pmpact Be 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Moderate Largeated By ONO DYES Impact Impactt Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ project is located is likely to grow by more than 5% Dyes ❑No • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this ❑No • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans porlgoals. ❑ • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ es ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO DYES If If YOU Cannot Determine)the Magntude Of as a Impact,otentia) Proceed oaPartr3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2- 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 14.14.17 (2/87)—gc 617.21 - Appendix B SEAR State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 71 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Visibility Distance Between Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available O /4 �4 '/2 �z-3 3-5 5+ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation ❑ ❑ ❑ El El of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural ❑ ❑ ❑ or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? El ❑ ❑ • State Parks? ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ natural features? EJEl ❑ • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic El ElEl ❑ El Recreational? ❑ ❑ ❑ • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? El El El El • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for El El El El establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ scenic? El ❑ F-1 • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ • County road? El El El ❑ • State? 11 E] El 11 El • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes ❑No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year ` during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ❑No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within l! *1/4 mile *1 mile ❑ ❑ Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *1/2 mile ❑Yes []No *1 miles ❑Yes ❑No *2 miles ❑Yes El No *3 miles ❑Yes ❑Nonate. * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as approp EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged whileproposed action Is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Activity ❑ El Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other 2 OgVFFOIcm k�, RAYMOND L. JACOBS &n 1 JAMES A. RICHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF p HIGHWAYS ENGINEERING ��Ol 0� INSPECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FEBRUARY 20, 1992 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Re: PETROL STATIONS LTD. (MINOR SUBDIVISION) RTE. 25 - CUTCHOGUE SCTM # 1000 - 109 - 01 - 23 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, I have reviewed the preliminary Plans that were submitted for the above referenced subdivision. The following is a hist of my comments: 1. A State Curb Cut Permit is required. 2. The Town Specification gives a runoff coefficient for paved surfaces a value of 1.0. A value of 0.9 was used in the Drainage Calculations. However, sufficient areas were used in the calculations for potential runoff which make the Design of 3 - 10' dia. x 10' deep leaching pools adequate. 3. Road Cross Section: The typical section shown on the drawing does not meet Town Specifications for Minor Subdivisions. This section of the code was updated on 11/27/90 and it requires a 4" compacted thickness Sub Base of Stone Blend or Crushed Concrete 231" thick Asphalt Binder and a 1' " thick Asphalt Wearing Surface. The Wearing Surface can be substituted by a Double Course of Bituminous Surface Treatment ( Oil & Stone) . If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact my office. S' erely, ames A. chter, A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs file � NCBiOARD PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS , •' ^� SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman y " - George RitchieSupervisor Latham, Jr. - Jy �- .1�� Richard G. Ward �� =, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 F L U a—J-5 4 1199'L Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of - �e �rn� ��e `�& Hamlet/Localit Y Coquo S.C.D.P.W. Topo No. : Zoning 'RO(Resle Tal aQ S.C. Tax Map No. : 1'000 - 1 D 9 - / - -1_ Major Sub. X _ Minor Sub. Site Plan Cluster MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Xc�a�ec� t�16�9� Preliminary Plat ( 3 copies) Road Profiles (1) tJIy�9�- Drainage Plans (1) _Topogroaphical Map (1) Site Plan (1) _ Grading Plan (1) Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet CONTINUED REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an nlisted)) (Type I) (Type II)Action. 2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes) (No . 4. The proposed division has rec ved approval from the S./C..'� Dept of Health. (Yes) No) . Comments: r7`jie qu f�1Vi14 1 is � ' /leircDl,NiC/ We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) Referral received 19 by Suffolk County Planning Commission and assigned File NO. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Jx' Chairman J It 'I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS wr SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ' qx. +"�+ 1,. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �� •� "' `� (� Richard G. Ward �'-' «fat '" -_�'� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (.516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 telDcuar� James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: Sta�lerys �'�� Tax Map No. : 1000 Jpq _ I _ A3 Street Location: �g n 5 Hamlet Location: Ma In ea Rcg -QLType of Application• Sketch Subdivision Ma (Dated X Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Ma0 I (Dated Road Profiles (Dated / / /y / gZ Gradin and Draina a Plans ) Other (Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminar Site Plan (Dated Gradin and Drainage Plans (Dated Other Comments• qceul P rt � I¢uod by F'rr c►r F a �an1s bane ra �( Contact Person: /1 W1tSSA �tQn GORMAN -PETROL Service Stations GROUP Love Lane, Mattituck,N.Y. 11952 516-298-8418 January 23, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM: 1000-109-1-23 Dear Chairman Orlowski, Enclosed are eight (8) copies of the minor subdivision map for the above referenced matter. We believe that this new map complies with your latest revision request, that is: 1. The building envelope for Lot 2 has been revised so that it is at least 175, in width at the building line. 2. The following restrictive covenant has been added: The vegetated buffer area is to remain undisturbed. Maintenance of natural vegetation (e.g. removal of dead or diseased plants) shall be the only activity allowed in the area. 3. Road profiles and drainage plans have been added. Also enclosed is the Full Environmental Assessment Form (Part 1 completed) for the subdivision application. We submitted our $400.00 check to your board on September 26, 1991 to cover the estimated cost for your Environmental Consultant to review the Full Environmental Assessment Form. Please authorize your consultant to proceed with his review at once. Very truly yours, �y► PETROL STATIONS LTD. D7JA a U 4 11Michael E. GormanOID TOeNNG BOARD cc: J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esquire curc�owt CUi'CHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT ;) Cutchogue, N.Y. Telephone T , 11935 (516) 734907 October 24, 1991 Mr Bennet Orlowski, Jr. Southold Town Planning Bd. Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Ref. Petrol Stations Ltd. Dear Mr. Orlowski, Reference the above estate and map. It is the opinion of the Board that a well is not required at this time. If there are any changes, please advise. Yours truly, Board of Fire Commissioners Matthew J. Martin Secretary mjm/ � 0WR 1W 4 199, ` ,r L2 Lu%1 ZZ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti f g` z SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman '4 O .,� �.� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. tt � Richard G. Ward Y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald ~" `' P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 22 , 1991 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Major Subdivision of Petrol Stations, Ltd. Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The following resolution was duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 22, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the maps dated June 28, 1991 with the following condition: 1. The building envelope for Lot 2 is to be revised so that it is at least 175 ' in width at the building line (see enclosed sketch for clarification) . Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of preliminary maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The preliminary submission must include road profiles and drainage plans. These maps will be forwarded by the Planning Board to the Engineer for review. The Planning Board is requiring that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions be filed stating that: Page 2 Petrol Stations Ltd. 1 . The vegetated buffer area is to remain undisturbed. Maintenance of natural vegetation (e.g. removal of dead or diseased plants) shall be the only activity allowed in the area. This covenant is also to be noted on the map. Please note that upon submission of the preliminary maps, the Planning Board will refer this subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for their review. You will be notified should any additional covenants and restrictions be required. For that reason, a draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions should be submitted after the Planning Board has reviewed the preliminary maps. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman N/O/F SOPHIE KALOSKI I N/O/F EUGENIA B. N 50. 04' oo" E N 7 2Y 50" E 380.88' 1"7.08' OZ los?s• 25788' % o O p �, m �s se• 57• oo" w }` 18seo' ,.:. fors � y z 0 O ,p O OTs a _ /xn� m AZO 2 2 20 9C?pL o yo: 558.5 "" 2ed.9r y \o / a` 11•� 5�1 6� �1 m IB'3p••lY 95.gI b Lenve% •L 2 � / I1m, Col 2s a N/p/F SroNE I 321971 S 56• oo• � �. o ED►q. Y BE 2 / 2 est W 7eo.0r 's #r�1APPMO C m �m za"e R 40 a 1'(^a OT AWA a � L So / -- —2 o r m K m X A 2 yo(p \��C �OgTq ��eMo✓cs ~Alti rG (o 124 ear, b S 58. 00• ':1'1IJ).\1•�i q�lQ MA/N 75090•"' Y ROAD f 25) GORMAN - PETROL Service Stations GROUP Love Lane, Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 p 516- 298-8478 September 26, 1991 I e mes� Lwz Na, Go2mam rt1 P,Q s�U V�eed'ec� t-EgF. - Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 6�-" Ma. G-rzma,rl cL 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 He" yeceivPC< 1Mts�, Re: Minor Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations, Ltd. North side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM: 1000-109-1-23 Dear Chairman Orlowski, Enclosed are eight (8) copies of the minor subdivision map for the above referenced matter. We believe that this new map complies with your latest revision request, that is: 1. Building envelopes are shown for all lots. 2. The existing driveway has been eliminated. 3. Access to Lot 4 is only from the proposed right of way (designated and stated on map). Please consider this letter as formal authorization for J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esquire of 828 Front Street, Greenport, New York 11944 to act as our agent in the subdivison process. Enclosed is our check in the amount of $400.00 as per the cost estimate stated in your letter of July 24, 1991 for your Environmental Consultant to review the Long Environmental Assessment Forms. Please authorize your consultant to proceed with his review at once. If your consultant can not perform his review within forty-five (45) days, please send us a list of other qualified Environmental Consultants who are acceptable to your board. Please initiate the SEQRA process and notify us of the date of sketch plan determination once it has been scheduled. Very truly yours, PETROL STATIONS LTD. EFLANNING Michael E. Gormance: J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esquire D AIS GORMAN -PETROL Service Stations GROUP Love Lane, Mattituck,N.Y. 11952 516-298-8478 September 26, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board , 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations, Ltd. North side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM: 1000-109-1-23 Dear Chairman Orlowski, Enclosed are eight (8) copies of the minor subdivision map for the above referenced matter. We believe that this new map complies with your latest revision request, that is: 1. Building envelopes are shown for all lots. 2. The existing driveway has been eliminated. 3. Access to Lot 4 is only from the proposed right of way (designated and stated on map). Please consider this letter as formal authorization for J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esquire of 828 Front Street, Greenport, New York 11944 to act as our agent in the subdivison process. Enclosed is our check in the amount of $400.00 as per the cost estimate stated in your letter of July 24, 1991 for your Environmental Consultant to review the Long Environmental Assessment Forms. Please authorize your consultant to proceed with his review at once. If your consultant can not perform his review within forty-five (45) days, please send us a list of other qualified Environmental Consultants who are acceptable to your board. Please initiate the SEQRA process and notify us of the date of sketch plan determination once it has been scheduled. Very truly yours, ESERP PETROL STATIONS LTD. 2 7 1991 ' Michael E. Gorman cc: J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esquire PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS r ti �'''�' ti SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Q, d !`' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �'rl �' ;; Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald -�usrzFt^` P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 July 24, 1991 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The Planning Board has reviewed the maps dated June 28, 1991, for the above mentioned subdivision proposal. In their correspondence of February 19, 1991, the Planning Board requested that a building envelope be indicated for Lot 1. Upon further review of the proposal, the Board is requesting that building envelopes be shown for all lots. Also, the map should state that Lot 4 is to have access from the proposed road only. The existing driveway is to be eliminated. The following items are required to complete the file: 1. A Long Environmental Assessment Form; 2. Authorization from the property owner for you to act as his agent throughout the subdivision process. The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $400.00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of Long Environmental Assessment Forms. The above mentioned sum must be paid in full by your client before we can authorize our consultant to proceed with the review, and before the Planning Board. can make a SEQRA determination on the project. M i Upon receipt of revised maps, and the above mentioned items, the Planning Board will schedule this application for a sketch plan determination and will start the SEQRA process. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. -mS Chairman i ATTORNEY AT LA 828 FRONT STREET, P. O. BOX 803 GREENPORT, NY 11944 (516)477-1016 July 2, 1991 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations, Ltd. SCTM # 1000-109-1-23 Gentlemen: I enclosed eight (8) copies of the revised subdivion map in the above-referenced matter. I believe these maps now conform to your letter to me dated June 12 , 1991 . Please proceed with your review of this minor subdivision. Very tr our , J. M u h in JKM/dmd enclosure cc: Michael Gorman kNNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS nnett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman %4 ^►`•"' C Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 June 12, 1991 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. sCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The Planning Board has reconsidered its previous requirement, that your client obtain a variance from the lot width requirement for Lot 4. The right-of-way, and associated road, are to be designed so that these areas are included in the applicable lots. They are not to be designed as a separate lot. If the map is so revised, a variance from the lot width requirement will not be required. Upon submission of revised maps in accordance with Numbers 2 and 4 of the Planning Board' s February 19, 1991 correspondence (copy enclosed for your convenience) , the Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. CC: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. � ..+!'�'•,! �.,.c�� '� Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall. 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 19 , 1991 J, Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. Dear Mr. McLaughlin: SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 The Planning Board reviewed the maps dated January 22, 1991, at their last work session. Below ple their comments: ase find a list of 1 - Lot 4 does not meet the minimum lot width required in the RO District when the twenty-five foot right-of-way has been excluded. If a variance can be obtained from the zoning Board of Appeals then the Planning Board could approve this subdivision . 2• The building envelope for Lot 1 must be shown. The envelope shall not include the sloped area. 3 • This application is considered a major, not a minor subdivision because a road must be built to provide access to the interior lots. The application fee submitted was for a minor subdivision, in the amount Of $2, 500. The application fee for this major subdivision is $1000 plus $100 per acre, or part thereof, which is a total of $1, 600. Accordingly, the Planning Board will request of the Town Board that it refund the difference; which is $900. 4- The zoning line between the RO and the R-40 districts shall be shown on Lot 4. The map shall state that the part of Lot 4 that lies within the R-40 district shall be a vegetated buffer area. Upon submission of revised maps and a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Page 2 Petrol Stations Ltd. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals oc��FFOIK��G JU# T. TERRY Town Hall, 53095 Main Road 1► P.O. Box 1179 FR Q T Southold, New York 11971 971 REOIsiO )WN CLERK Fax (516) 765-1823 OFFICER Telephone (516) 765-1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 12, 1991 : RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes a refund of $900.00 to Petrol Stations Ltd. , which sum represents the difference between the filing fee for a minor subdivision and a major subdivision (applicant applied for a minor subdivision, paying $2,500.00 fee, and it was discovered a road would be required, thus the subdivision was classifed as a major, and the application fee for a major subdivision is $1 ,600.00, therefore the difference of $900.00) ; said refund is hereby granted in accordance with the recommendation of the Southold Town Planning Board. J�T Te Southold Town Clerk March 14, 1991 MAR 1 5 1991 ATTORNEY AT LA 828 FRONT STREET, P. O.BOX 803 DA GREENPORT,NY 11944 (516)477-1016 / 'I March 27, 1991 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FOR PETROL STATIONS, LTD. SCTM 1000 - 109 - 1 - 23 Gentlemen: I am in receipt of your letter dated February 19, 1991 . I have no problem with any of your comments, except item 1 . Lot 4 has a minimum width of 150 . 30 feet. The twenty five foot right of way is simply that - an easement for ingress and egress for lots 1 , 2 and 3 . The owner of Lot 4 owns the land over which there is said right of way. As a result, the lot width is in conformity with the require- ments in an RO District and no varience is require , Ver . t u , J evin ,kc a igh.d 'n JKM/lmt APR - I )gg PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS = r rn SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �� Supervisor Richard G. Ward `)%�� Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk FROM: Bennett Orlowski, J17. , Chairman RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Major Subdivision #764 DATE: February 27, 1991 An application fee in the amount of $2 ,500. 00 was submitted on April 18, 1990, for the above mentioned subdivision. The application fee was for a minor subdivision. The proposed subdivision for Petrol Stations requires the construction of a road. Thus, this subdivision is classified as a major, rather than a minor subdivision. The application fee for a major subdivision is $1,600. Accordingly, the Planning Board requests that the Town Board refund the difference; which is $900. uF"rCl �, o, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o = ^' Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman yr Sic. 'C. SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward �1 = `�� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 19, 1991 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. Dear Mr. McLaughlin: SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 The Planning Board reviewed the maps dated January 22, 1991, at their last work session. Below please find a list of their comments: 1. Lot 4 does not meet the minimum lot width required in the RO District when the twenty-five foot right-of-way has been excluded. If a variance can be obtained from the Zoning Board of Appeals then the Planning Board could approve this subdivision. 1. The building envelope for Lot 1 must be shown. The envelope shall not include the sloped area. 3 . This application is considered a major, not a minor subdivision because a road must be built to provide access to the interior lots. The application fee submitted was for a minor subdivision, in the amount of $2,500. The application fee for this major subdivision is $1000 plus $100 per acre, or part thereof, which is a total of $1,600. Accordingly, the Planning Board will request of the Town Board that it refund the difference; which is $900. 4• The zoning line between the RO and the R-40 districts shall be shown on Lot 4 . The map shall state that the part of Lot 4 that lies within the R-40 district shall be a vegetated buffer area. Upon submission of revised maps and a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. l � Page 2 Petrol Stations Ltd: Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. (/ Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals �C�GC LAW ATTORNEY 828 FRONT STREET,, P.O.. BOX 803 GREENPORT,NY 11944 (516)477-1016 January 29, 1991 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations, Ltd. SCTM # 1000-109-1-23 Gentlemen: I have enclosed eight (8) copies of the revised proposed minor subdivision map in the above referenced matter pursuant to your letter dated November 27, 1990. Please accept this filing as an amended application for a four (4) lot minor subdivision. Regarding your require- menttthat Covenants and Restrictions be filed, we have no problem assuming that you are seeking to prevent any further development within lot four (4) on the proposed map. My client is willing to provide that the area of lot four (4) within the R-40 district will be left in its natural state to act as a buffer to the residential zone. Please advise me if you require anything further to process this application. Otherwise, please advise me of the date on which the Board will next consider this matter. Very truly ur J. I` Mc JKM/dmd ; enclosures 16610 ^ NVC January 24, 1991 Dear Members of the Planning Board, In regard to the Subdivision Application for _Petrol Stations Ltd. , SCTM# 1000-109-1-230 APpl• N. 3972. I request this application be denied for the following reasons; 1. Thomas J . Gorman bought property knowing access was limited. 2. Property width is only 125 feet on Rt. 25 . Proposed road would be within feet , of house to the west. 3. Town Planner Valerie Seopaz 1n a memorandum dated 6/5/87 voiced her disapproval of project. 4. Project would include- one- existing-homer.and bares , with two Businesses operating;from .them. Three new hones, increased traffic. and would certainly devalue neighboring property in area. 5 . And finally a petition was submitted containing 75 names, which 100A of surrounding landowners voiced their disapproval to project. Note : This petition was lost from file, so I'm submitting another copy. In closing the Southold Town Code was promulgated to protect the landowner in just this type of situation. Please obey Town Code and deny this application. Thank you, N cy Sawastynowicz 30291991 To The Boar of Ac;eais , Tc:•:n cf zouthold : We the undersigned do not want an area variance for Lot 4 which does not contain the minimum lot area required . Tax map No. 1000- 109-01 -23 . Owners ' names: Petrol Stations , Ltd . at Gutchogue . The purpose of zoning is to protect gur Town from being over developed . to allow the minimum lot size requirment to be down zoned will set a precendent for other developers. To quote from Southold Town Code , Residential Office (RO) District . The purpose of the Residential Office (RO) District is to provide a transition area between business areas and low-density residential development along major roads which will provide opportunity for limited nonresidential uses in essentially residential areas." Name �� Address r , 15 Ca C: k X11,, /D D a�sz 55 a&4 To The Board of AL;ears , Tcwn of Southold: does notthe con ainrthenminimumnot lotwant areanarea required. Tax for Not 1000which 109-01-23 . Owners ' names: Petrol Stations , Ltd . at Cutchogue . The purpose of zoning is to protect our Town from being over developed. to allow the minimum lot size requirment to be down zoned will set a precendent for other developers. 11 To quote from Southold Town Code , Residential Office (P.0) District . The purpose of the Residential Office (RO) District is to provide a transition area between business areas and low-density residential development along major roads which will provide opportunity for limited nonresidential uses in essentially residential areas." mmmeee r Address U l ei 1 � ( 177 s `` i o C - 4 To The Board of Az;eais , To<<rn of oouthold : 'de the undersigned do not want an area variance for Lot 4 which does not contain the minimum lot area required. Tax map No. 1000- 109-01-23 . Owners ' names: Petrol Stations , Ltd. being over at Cutchogue . The purpose of zoning is to protect our Town from b developed . to allow the minimum lot size requirment to ei down zoned will set a precendent for other developers . To quote from Southold Town Code , Residential Office (RO) District . " The purpose of the Residential Office (RO) District is to provide a transition area between business areas and low-density residential development along major roads which will provide opportunity for limited nonresidential uses in essentially residential areas. " Name Address VOL ?L ,'/ 'SLA VA z �A �l l 1 II n u 1 ,11 r-7, I a 4 0-ir 41 _A4 C G u.C.�.o` �" 2 . C�� , S�U �i��. Glc • ' ��;��Lcc�G/2 � • ���S,' To The Board of Ar-eais , Town of Oouthold: We he does nottcon ainrthenminimumolotant areanarea required. Tax map hot 1000ich 109-01-23 . Owners ' names: Petrol Stations , Ltd. at Cutchogue. The purpose of zoning is to protect our Town from being over developed . to allow the minimum lot size requirment to be down zoned will set a precendent for other developers . To quote from Southold Town Code , Residential Office (RO) District . The purpose of the Residential Office (RO) District is to provide a transition area between business areas and low-density residential development along major roads which will provide opportunity for limited nonresidential uses in essentially residential areas.,, Name- Address ) v 700 (21 V7 1 To The Board of Ap eals , Town of oouthold: We the undersigned do not want an area variance for Lot 4 which does not contain the minimum lot area required. Tax map No. 1000- 109-01 -•23 . Owners ' names: Petrol Stations , Ltd. at Lutchogue . The purpose of zoning is to protect our Town from being over developed . to allow the minimum lot size requirment to be down zoned will set a precendent for other developers. To quote from Southold Town Code , Residential Office (RO) District . " The purpose of the Residential Office (RO) District is to provide a transition area between business areas and low-density residential development along major roads which will provide opportunity for limited nonresidential uses in essentially residential areas." t Name Address Z( { ,. G � , 41 > z J ( r t SIJ / L �c ' M To The Board of AL,eais , Tarn of aouthold: We the undersigned do not want an area variance for Lot 4 which does not contain the minimum lot area required . Tax map No. 1Cu0- 109-01 -23 . Owners ' names : Petrol Stations, Ltd. at Cutchogue. The purpose of zoning is to protect our Town from being over developed . to allow the minimum lot size requirment to be down zoned will set a precendent for other developers . To quote from Southold Town Code , Residential Office (P.0) District . " The purpose of the Residential Office (RO) District is to provide a transition area between business areas and low-density residential development along major roads which will provide opportunity for limited nonresidential uses in essentially residential areas ." 1 Name Address 14 Sao To The Board of Ac;eais , Tcwn Of oouthold : J* ;9'e the undersigned do not want an area variance for Lot 4 which does not contain the minimum lot area required . Tax map No. 1GGO- 109-01 -23 . Cwners ? names: Petrol Stations , Ltd . at Cutchogue. The purpose of zoning is to protect our Town from being over developed . to allow the minimum lot size requirment to be down zoned will set a precendent for other developers . To quote from Southold Town Code , Residential Office (F.0) District . " The purpose of the Residential Office (RO) District is to provide a transition area between business areas and low-density residential development along major roads which will provide opportunity for limited nonresidential uses in essentially residential areas." 1 Name Address PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y u ^ SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairmanv� �'7► - Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (5 16) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November 27, 1990 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street Greenport, Ne w York 11944 RE: Subdivision Application for Petrol Stations Ltd. SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The Planning Board has re-reviewed the subdivision application for the above mentioned parcel in reference to the lot located in the Residential/Office (RO) District. The Board is amending its prior request that the lot line follow the boundary of the zoning line. The lot to be located in the RO and the R-40 Districts can be designed as a 40, 000 square foot lot. However, the Board will require that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions be filed stating that the area in the R-40 District is to be left in its natural state to act as a buffer to the residential zone. Should your client redesign the layout as noted above, an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals will not be necessary. However, variances may be required for those lots that do not meet the minimum requirements for lot width and or depth. It should be noted that the map that was submitted to the Planning Board is for three ( 3 ) lots. The Board can not review the four (4 ) lot proposal that was submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals for the variance unless you revise your application before the Planning Board and submit revised maps. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, dam, 11-1�/� Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals -�1i�:e.wils�..«t:�.,.,ws�,.;,:.... .e.�.....a.....ai��.sz.::ea. - .dnb.:n:ee:�.ww.nY.as,.x.: r�.,:..o.'s aessx _•..:,.,::; _ ''^ ., ..- - __...�:.. ...�u:,e 11 4 �+ SCOTT L. HARRIS PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS -G Supervisor Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. "Y 7f.,. ?� 1%, Town Hall. 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman RE: PetroSCTM#110001109-1Stations Ld 2 Appl. No. 3972 DATE: October 5 , 1990 The Planning Board has reviewed the above mentioned application in reference to the area variance which is before your Board. The proposed lot, which is located within the boundaries of the Residential/Office (RO) District is 25,603 square feet in. area, excluding the right-of-way. The minimum lot size in a RO District is 40 ,000 square feet in area. Thus, the proposed lot is 14 ,397 square feet shy of the minimum requirements for this zone. The Planning Board has no objection to the granting of an area variance for Lot Number 4 in the above mentioned subdivision. This non-conforming lot was created by the arbitrary Residential/Office District line. it ill thathalldbe lotsnoted that have accesshfromatheng Board proposedwroad. requiring Also, the map that was submitted to your office for purposes of the area variance is different from that which was submitted to the Planning Board office for the subdivision proposal. The- application before the Planning Board is for a three lot subdivision. This revision, as with the other amendments which were made to the map, will be reviewed by the Planning Board during the subdivision review should the area variance be granted by your Board. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS tS Brune[[ Orlowski, Jr., Chairman y,�`� � �- SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. DI �`ao Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 10 , 1990 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Petrol Stations, Ltd. SCTM#k 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The Planning Board reviewed the maps dated February 5, 1987 for the above mentioned subdivision. Lot #3 is located in the Residential/Office (RO) District. This district requires a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet. The lot as proposed is 35,406 square feet in area, approximately 4,710 square feet of that being in the residential zone. The lot does not meet the minimum requirements of the District. Therefore, a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals is required. In addition, the Board is not in favor of the RO lot encroaching on the residential district. The lot line must follow the boundary of the zoning line. The Planning Board can not proceed with the subdivision review until such time that a variance is granted by the Zoning Board of appeals. Therefore, it is recommended that you make an application to the Zoning Board of Appeals as soon as possible. Upon receipt of a positive determination from the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Planning Board will proceed with your application. Please note that the Planning Board will be requiring the following information on the revised subdivision plat: 1. The proposed road must terminate in a cul-de-sac ( see enclosed map for an illustration) ; 2. Access to all lots must be from the proposed road; 3 . The map must be drawn at a scale of 1" = 100' rather than 1" = 601 . 0 A 4 . The current zoning districts must be noted on the map. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. �EFOIk X05- `: CpG Town Hall, 53095 Main Road v i': SCOTT L. HARRIS E' Supervisor P.O. Box 1179 vQ Southold, New York Fax (516) 765-1823 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 16, 1990 J. Kevin McLaughlin 828 Front Street P.O. Box 808 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Minor Subdivision of Petrol Stations SCTM# 1000-109-1-23 Dear Mr. McLaughlin: In response to your letter of December 19, 1989, please be advised that a new application complete with maps, fee and a completed environmental assessment form must be submitted before the Planning Board could begin review. This application will be reviewed in accordance with the current zoning regulations. Please contact this office if you have any further questions. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. l/ Chairman C �o goo X ✓ ,a -iso . , HS (Z t1 f l\161 g01 P�o112 cc�l t �nr�grq }kurusJUNEANN D.ZARZECKk r�ve&A p tf a� t �2 �ro�S�} �U Notary PuState of New York bo. ) V Qualified in Suffolk County ...I�-f�4ih11 t N (f�Cy S (1 Q,t^tTi p.e1J� My Commission Expires Jan. 8, 1991 � ) rocl cov cJ- �p �, ML7YY\ 1 e2 L T� � y f� peck foa,rn wt rV C��w .C �21tSS A. JIJL(ZO u rt -o_ ol I.0 i a W., It, o COUNTY OF SUFFOLK —------ "'!C'JTMOLD Real Property T Agency 09 Z-1 Service Ag loco c--o-- Pi�ER—F9. AbL Ars u SCOTT L. HARRIS APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS - ��$ y ry Supervisor Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. 7l r'' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Serge Doyen, Jr. :_. L1� P.O. Box 1179 Joseph H. Sawicki Southold, New York 11971 James Dinizio, Jr. BOARD OF APPEALS Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM TO: Southold Town Planning Board FROM: Board of Appeal DATE: September 20 , 1990 SUBJECT: Appl. No. 3974 - Donald' Osani (Brudermann) ID00-79-5-10 & 11 Appl. No. 3972 - Petrol Station Ltd. (/ 1000-109-1-23 Our Office has an received applications concerning set-off divisions or minor subdivisions which involve requests for area variances as shown on the attached maps (furnished by applicant) . Our file will remain open for your coordinated comments or other statements concerning the general layout as applies under the subdivision regulations on this project until October 17, 1990_ In the event you are not able to submit comments concerning the general layout of the proposed division of land by this date, it will be assumed that you have no objections and we will have no alternative but to proceed with considering the applicant's map as prepared and submitted by applicant at the public hearing. Thank you for your cooperation in this coordination. lk Attachment (Applicant' s Map and County Tax Map) SEP 2 1 1990 1 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING HOARD OF APPEALS 2 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK : STATE OF NEW YORK ,/ 0 I 1 3 ------------------------------------% 71 3 6177 01 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS HEARING 5 ------------------------------------ 1 41990 ---------------- --------------------X II ��, CD s Ll 7 Town Hall 53095 Main Road 8 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 g November 1, 1990 1 10 7:30 P.M. 11 B S F 12 O R E 13 GERARD P. GOEBRINGER, 14 Chairman. 15 BOARD MEMBERS: R 16 CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. 'k 17 a- SERGE DOYEN, JR. �• 18 N. JOSEPH H. SAWICKI - Absent — 19 JAMES DINIZIO, JR. 20 21 ALSO PRESENT; LINDA ROWALSKI , Hoard Secretary 22 23 7 24 25 s, ' 22 2 THE CHAIRMAN: The next appeal is on 3 behalf of Petrol Station Ltd. , Appeal Number 4 3972. The legal notice reads as follows: 5 (Legal notice read off record. ) 6 THE CHAIRMAN: I have a copy of a 7 survey, dated January 12, 1987 , by John a Metzger, Land Surveyor, indicating the 9 nature of this application which is, I 10 assume, Lot Number 4, which is 25,603 square 11 feet, containing a one-story frame house. I 12 have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map 13 indicating this and surrounding properties 14 in the area. 15 Is there somebody that would like to 16 be heard? 17 MR. McLAOGHLIN: Good evening. My 18 name is Kevin McLaughlin, Esquire. I am 19 here in behalf of the Petrol Station, as I 20 think our application indicates. 21 We are basically here at the 22 direction of the Planning Board. We filed 23 an application for the minor subdivision. 24 The Planning Board, upon reviewing that 25 subdivision, decided they would prefer to 1 23 ri 2 see the lot line of Lot Number 4, which is 3 the lot closest to the road, to coincide 4 with the existing zone line within the RO 5 District and the R-40 District. They 6 requested that we come before this Board to 7 obtain a variance to allow us to have that 6 undersized lot. That is basically why we 9 are here these evening. 10 THE CHAIRMAN: What is the nature of 11 the existing garage at the lot line? 12 MR. McLAUGHLIN: It is just for l 13 storage right now. u 14 THE CHAIRMAN: What will happen to it 15 if the lot line continues through? Will it 16 be destroyed or moved from one side to the n other? You will leave it where it is? It 16 is with the encroachment on -- 19 MR. McLAUGHLIN: Probably, unless we 20 have problems with the sale of the next lot, 21 but otherwise we will just leave it there. 22 THE CHAIRMAN: Who is the owner of 23 this house, the former, owner for the 24 record, if you know? 25 MR. McLAUGHLIN: I think I have a { 24 2 deed here that probably would indicate -- I 3 will be happy to provide that information to 4 you. I don't seem to be able to find the 5 deed right now. 6 THE CHAIRMAN: Is the house presently 7 lived in or rented? 8 MR. McLAUGHLIN: It is presently 9 being used for a real estate office. 10 Correct? 11 MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE: (Nodding ,2 yes. ) 13 THE CHAIRMAN: Kevin, the right-of- 14 way into the property is not clearly 15 defined; is that correct? 16 MR. McLAUGHLIN: Not clearly defined? 17 THE CHAIRMAN: In other words, is 18 there a driveway which actually extends into 19 these four lots? 20 MR. McLAUGHLIN: Not that is 21 proposed. That is part of the minor 22 subdivision. 23 THE CHAIRMAN: That's why I 'm having 24 trouble finding it . I will go back down 25 there and measure it this time, and make 25 2 sure I know exactly where the parcel starts 3 and stuff . Thank you very much. 4 Is there anybody else that would like 5 to speak in favor of this application? 6 Anybody that would like to speak against the 7 application? a MS. SAWASTYNOWICZ: Good evening. 9 Nancy Sawastynowicz, and I have a petition I 10 would like to hand to the Board. That is 11 the original and copies. 12 (Ms. Sawastynowicz handing copies of 13 petition to the Board. ) 14 MS. SAWASTYNOWICZ: "We the 15 undersigned do not want an area variance for 16 Lot Number 4 which does not contain the 17 minimum lot area required. Tax Map Number 18 1000-109-01-23. Owner's names: Petrol 19 Stations, Ltd. at Cutchogue. 20 The purpose of zoning is to protect 21 our Town from being overdeveloped. To allow 22 the minimum lot size requirement to be down 23 zoned will set a precedent for other C124 developers. 25 To quote from Southold Town Code, 2 Residential Office (RO) District. 26 3 'The purpose of the Residential 4 Office (RO) District is to provide a 5 transition area between business areas and 6 low-density residential development along 7 major roads which will provide opportunity 8 for limited nonresidential uses in 9 essentially residential areas. "' 10 We feel to down zone this lot will 71 make a tremendous problem there because in 12 the summertime you cannot get out on the 13 road from Alvah's Lane now, and the people 14 of the surrounding area -- I have 100 15 percent of them signing this petition. 16 y That 's all I would like to say. 17 Thank you. 18 THE CHAIRMAN: Anybody else that 19 would like to speak against the application? 20 Any comments? 21 MS. SAWASTYNOWICZ: I have a 22 notarized letter from one of the neighbors. 23 You don't want me to read it? -� 24 THE CHAIRMAN: No. 25 (Ms. Sawastynowicz handing letter to 1 27 2 the Board. ) 3 MR. McLAUGHLIN: As far as the 4 argument for the undersized lot, basically 5 we don't care whether that lot was 6 undersized or not. Our original application 7 to the Planning Board was for a larger lot s there. However, they felt that the lot s should coincide with the existing lot line. 10 At this rate, we have more than sufficient 11 area for the minor subdivision we have in 12 mind. The other lots are all , if you will , 13 oversized. They are all well in excess of 14 the minimal lot requirement for these lots. 15 We are simply here because the Planning 16 Board feels that this front lot should have 17 a lot line that is coexisting with the 18 zoning line there. 19 THE CHAIRMAN: That is an R-40 zone. 20 MR. McLAUGHLIN: In back of the RO is 21 the R-40 zone. That is correct. 22 THE CHAIRMAN: In effect, Lot Number 23 1 and 2 could be reduced in size. Cl 24 MR. McLAUGHLIN: Could be -- sure. 25 THE CHAIRMAN: Is that what you 1� 28 2 originally had submitted to the Planning 3 Board? 4 MR. McLAUGHLIN: Actually, what we 5 submitted was a three lot -- originally, the 6 minor subdivision application we filed with 7 the Planning Board showed Lots 1 and 2 to be 8 approximately two and a half acre lots. But 9 again, while Lot 4 simply is an undersized 10 lot and that is what was proposed. That's 11 why we are before you tonight. The rest of 12 the lots are well in excess and I don't see 13 that there is going to be any difference 14 between the amount of traffic, whether or 15 not this Lot 4 is as continued and as 16 applied for or whether or not you move the 17 lot iine 'back any further. You are still 18 going to have the same use there, whether or 19 not there are 1,500 square feet to it or not 20 -- 15,000 -- excuse me. 21 THE CHAIRMAN: In the past, we have 22 had some discussion with the Planning Board 23 in situations like this. If you would allow 24 me to recess this hearing to go to the next �i 25 regularly scheduled meeting, I would like to 1 29 2 meet with the Planning Board and ask them 3 specifically why they chose to go this 4 route. We know the reason why they chose to 5 go this route but I would like to meet with 8 them, either formally or informally, if you 7 wouldn't mind, rather than me close the 8 hearing tonight. 9 MR. McLAUGHLIN: We have no 10 objection. 11 THE CHAIRMAN: Okay. I think that is 12 what I am going to do at this point . Thank 13 you very much. 4 Yes? 15 DOROTHY OVISINAK: They would have to is make a right-of-way for this; am I correct? n THE CHAIRMAN: Yes. 18 MS. OVISINAK: You know we have had 19 quite a few accidents already by Alvah's 20 Lane and it is very bad there now, and to 21 make a right-of-way into this is going to 22 only cause a major problem there especially 23 with Manor Hill (phonetic spelling) and I 24 just feel , at this time, I don't think it 25 would be feasible to make a right-of-way. I 30 J 2 hope the Board will take this into 3 consideration. 4 THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you very much. 5 M3. 3AWA3TYNOWICZ: I would like to 6 say one more thing. When you are asking 7 about what is in that house, there is also 8 another business on that property of an 9 architect in the barn. There are two 10 businesses in that lot. I think that is 11 illegal in the code. I would like to Board 12 to look into that, too. 73 MR. McLAUGHLIN: For the record, we 14 have received site plan approval for the 15 architectural firm that is in the garage. 16 THE CHAIRMAN: There are two existing 77 CO's on the property? 18 MR. McLAUGHLIN: I believe so. There 19 are two existing CO's for the two separate 20 businesses. 21 THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Hearing no 22 further comments at this hearing, I make a 23 motion recessing this to the next regularly 24 scheduled hearing which we will have an 25 information discussion with the Planning 1 31 2 Board on this. 3 MR. ORIOONIS: Second. 4 THE CHAIRMAN: All in favor. 5 MR. ORIOONIS: Aye- 6 MR. DOYEN: Aye. MR. DINIZIO: Aye- 8 THE CHAIRMAN: Thanks very much, 9 everybody, for coming in. 10 (Time noted: 8:15 p.m. ) 11 THE CHAIRMAN: The next appeal is in 12 behalf of Betty J. Copia, Appeal Number 13 3977. The legal notice reads as follows: 14 (Legal notice read off record. ) 15 THE CHAIRMAN: I have a copy of the 16 survey, dated June 15, 1976, by R. van Tuyl 17 and Sons, indicating a one and a half story 18 or two story frame home, approximately :<s 3 19 centered on the property. The nature of 20 this application is a new two-car garage, 21 approximately 54 feet south of this 22 particular dwelling, approximately 10 feet 23 from the southerly property line -- I have C124 south, actually southeasterly property line. 25 I have a copy of the suffolk County Tax Map P 145A rl 2 3 C E R T I F I C AT I O N 4 5 6 I , GAIL ROSCHEN, do hereby certify that 7 B I am an Official Court Reporter and that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct 9 10 transcript of the Town of Southold Zoning tt Board of Appeals hearing of November 1, 1990, 12 according to my stenographic notes . O // �C j d c 13 GAIL ROSCHEN Official Court Reporter 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 � 24 25 Ak IMF SITE ��F?�5 F P�IDe �p�R p �� _ / �i �E� / P y PROPOSED MINOR SUBDI VISION FOR s PE TROL S TA TI ONS LTD LOCATION MAP ° s 01 / �� �G 5 A T CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 5°eelge ` /, p�F �Fe SUFFOLK000 10900 01Y- 23 N. Y Z a o�n f I `66y6 a��GPti Scale 12, 1987 ' o d °° EPS ¢ off• ��p��� �F��� L June 27, 1990(revised lots) o p e+�i 5�° 1 � G•l GP go O M ;p •e: I -� ' <•4 . 0' /ao c � � ��� P s °t` 49ja? 'eAo � �R°� /yo��Osf- �Z o• 5 R ' •a �3`. O lq�o �PsOvye'"a oov� o pEi t« Zyyg' .00 °63 9Z \3� 5�� . O�F�- � �� ( / 2951 \I � 20 �' �"o.• ZyA � '��� � 6A- s`#� VPEk6p ��r"+,h+`. Ss�6 5 5\Q�1 SPF UPPP / �9 0 m\ 25ryt °o�Pip�\cs 04 •o Pq� O 'Ji 0 0 1011 �'Q G� � °� .9 � Q0 APPLICANT: %a ND AREA LOT I = 1.965 acres _v a PETROL STAT/ONS, LTD. nnerz� L�\ AREA LOT 2 = 2.041 acres q �A` C/O THOMAS J. GORMAN Z C e .; AREA LOT 3 = 1.125 acres �i f` LOVE LAME �v a� `�9 0� AREA LOT 4 = 0.705 `rf D f2 MATT/T(JcK x Y. J L5 TOTAL AREA = 5.836 acres 2 G PraPared in aocordance with the milImimms Q� 021ft standwWo for NUe ewv re se eetablaUd t ko. 6�® yo tY the LLA.L.AL and 4W*md aeda° ' q ted N.Y.S. LIC. NO. 49818 Inr As t nr. Now Yerk arenLa d E LINES ARE REFERENCED PECONIC-SURVEYORS. P.C. 20 TO TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIVE EASTERN TOWNS. P. 0. B5 -OX 09 9 d" P. O. B MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 RR _ tq.jinr i SITE Q 00, AACRTH Q KEY MAP �\ Scale, I' = 600' 00 kj, V '4 E R = 30.0 �, SUR VE Y OF PROPER T Y FOR F � ' ^� � L = 48'80" z°�' od LOT LINE CHANGE A T FLEETS NECK �� �-` 2 v`, � ti �o � �•� �'`� LD SOWOL� COUNTY�N A 0 0 0 1000 - 103 - 13 - 18.1,19 & 20 ss 9 Scale 1'" 40' . ' Feb. 22, 1994 CY V s. gyp. � � .�� vv 3 �6 it, < ZONING DISTRICT: R40 z u OWNERS JAMES McNEIL D G /85 WEST CREEK A VE. D CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. APR 2 51994 %. 00- ` v o��roa JOHN H. McNEIL CA o. \ s ,a°`f4 �a C/O JAMES McNEIL SouTNoIDTOwN �s p" \ ` )0 185 WEST CREEK AVE. PUNNING BOARD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 5gv LANO `(� EXISTING AREAS ��' 'T• a° 0 /000 - 103 - l3 - 18.1 = 28,326 sq.fl. Prepared in accordance with the minimum 1\y. 1000 - 103 - 13 - 19 = 14,305 sq.11. standards for title surveys as established o /000 - 103 - 13 -20 = 13,000 sq.fl. " S. LIC. NO. 496/8 by the L.I.A.L.S. and approved and adopted TOTAL AREAS 55,63/ sq.fl. �° for such use by The New York State Land PECO O S, P.C. Title Association. (5/6) 76 P. 0. BOX 909 CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO FIVE EASTERN MAIN ROAD TOWNS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 1197/ 94-113 Cenc�� Q � e�c�n a�,� ro�1aQ g l^cvn�ec� 22- S1 V KEY MAP T Scale 1"=600, SUBDIVISION FOR Ply PETROL STATIONS LTD. a1°0 a'° N� �/Z'/' A T CUTCHOG TOWN OF SOUTHOLD d °� ,► ' SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. P `� / e 1000 - 109 - 01 - 23 a Scale 1" = 100' N / al°� 1 � Jan, '12 1987 20 is d 104na 27,#10 ` y° yhgJ %.� �� Jjan. 22, 1991(r(evisz lots)) P9 1 E IS lJ IS 20 u d L5 .521 SEP 2 7 1991 1 1 SONTHOLO TOWN � \$ �0,, / ,� �� N Z rIANNINO BOAND .t+s�c as y65 � Ot sT#jy R -1-- 'a* 405 �w 'o-Al 10 �, sy s' S0tIP �� aG QO P Or NOTE A� LOT 4 TO HAVE DRIVEWAY / . A(� ACCESS TO MAIN ROAD ( S. R. 25 �V LocwHo "— -r rats r uex r LK cNaa+EY a,Hex r MAX TOTAL AREA = 5.8S5acrea 7-4!ET' —' y r AREA. LOT 1 = 1885 acres TEST Yx[T 4'PIPE 1tl, ctlnFYM a^ HOLE DATA WWI x Y PIr APPROVED PRE SD., AREA LOT 2 = 1.792 aeries LOAN 3.5' WE,,z r PrrOH AEAA LOT S = 0.980 acres e AREA 'LOT 4 = 1.099 acres BAND A D DRAVEL a°' -f IN aO.Fr. IIs � MAX COARSE SANG SIDE WALL AREA W LEACIeKR POOL S. COARSE SAND LEALHNL IN AM I do certify that this map was made by us from IT ' surveys completed �H 22 177 �n °'�� �`��' , G4 r�Ae T„ '�L ROAD SIM fiAO.'OLL 1MTERLAL TO BE 4,and that all concrete monm+enta have been m LLQ i,, eLE�w sera s auvEl (0r will bel set as shown thus ■ ners0n. U'�e� `Fe OagRa WA - --- "_— " TYPICAL PLOT PLAN - r--,. yy =%R ALLMAM S' 0 veyor va, c WATER nav MPfT;ur TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM rano No, �9 O Sex eN AaoVE r�Aae Aro rAaoGEAlOOo , . ea au aRADE arm rw° ,R aE uieu.pproyp�a�E "No°w IruaDa� This is to cert bard o�he Town of division Southold by rs been an hol approved �v ^by thie ovif d t b of approval dated byChavman PbsrAV Board ap-M WA CASING wec arm APPLICANT: — suuMee(E°" PETROL STATIONS, INC. C/O THOMAS l GORMAN � LOVE LANE Prepared in accordance with the minimum N.Y.S. L/C. NO. 49818 MATTITUCK, N Y. TYPICAL WELL DETAIL standards for title surveys as established by the L.LA.L.S. and approved and adopted pECONIC URVEYORS, P.C. for ouch use by The New York State Land (516) 765 - 5020 ELEVATIONS AND CONTOUR LrS ARE REFERENCED 1Title Association. P. O. BOX 909 TO TOPOGRAPHIC OF FIVE EASTERN TOWNS. MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD NY. 11871 86 - 650 C a ryP FN LOT 4 LOT 3 \ m M N I o * I 25/Right of Way ,c/— �k c 25' RIGHT OF WAY N �/ f P, pos N o ro es Yi0 n, ''wN Ov v�V k LOT 2 ,g5 = PLAN' OF ENTRANCE a ° Q SCALE 2D' 1 �,o'�C Ci YS / 14/x•. f /e�' i Te. 23. _ProposeoL S/a.aLe A W �' LOT 1 O PLAN n 2 SCALE' 1" = 60' Zi9 civ � p as a� P.l22.n Pio o43 v�,_0..6 24/0 Al- P2 29 �3'� DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS A L- 60 Ac4'U.a2 PAVEMENT = 11582 sq. 1/. iso VFe SPC V°' OTHER = 4742 sq. It 2.es oPo 'orgo 22.9e Zbo O.9e M' V = ARC w" A = AREA pQ�c h R = 2' RUNOFF C - COEFFICIENT RUNOFF 11582 x 0.17 x 0.9 = 1772 cu. /1. v 4 742 x 0.17 x 0.3 = 242 2014 e � i .Q 20/4/68.4 - 29.4//0 = 2.9 PROVIDE 3 L.P.s /O� IO' DEEP i L A PLAN & PROFILE ti N 25'RIGHT OF WA Y _ PETROL STA TIONS LTD. M M PROFILE Q ° A T CUTCHOGUE SCALE : VERT. 1" = 10' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HORIZ. 1" = 60' SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y rrPicAROAD AysEcrioN 1000 - 109 - 01 - 23 1 /4`Sr W e EMO JAN. 14, 1992 °D .J,' LIC. NO. 49618 ,JAN 2 4 f9A`L D"COH/Ac>Po ECO Vf�Y, , ' P.C. 4A'AVFL - oSA VEL P. 0. Tao" 'S D•�l,`'i coNrPHr toy BEtwM ' BOpPc01 P. O. 60x ,gOs' ;r' MAIN ROAD -. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 1197/ - 86-650D S1 KEY MAP Scale 1"=600' 4 re SUBDIVISION FOR �y PETROL STA TIONS L TD. �'°0 � `��- , `� P ltOlt A T CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000 - 109 - 01 - 23 116 apps t °IFScale 1" = 100, N °� `0 8D� �� 4k / p Jan, 12, 1987 s o y1 \ ° June 27, 1990(revised Iota) b a / 1°If, �L Jan. 22, 1991(rewsed kits) et AL / m c�efte is a e t.rz F i.as.as YTC�K % 69; / tl, gM1tig4 1 $ /�O1t' P e VV E tp 2 9 - - IF - r, 1'I I '6 �" a, 7,y COVENANT .�'tT �. r11O��N t p0 Tis , t6. dd4p l5• THE VEGETATED BUFFER AREA IS TO REMAIN S �.O eL. b 1 b UNDISTURBED. MAINTENANCE OF NATURAL VEGETATION f E. G. REMOVAL OF DEAD OR DISEASED PLANTS I PO SHALL BE THE ONLY ACTIVITY ALLOWED IN THE AREA. a � NOTE A� LOT 4 TO HAVE DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO MAIN ROAD ! S. R. 25 cAm°�Oia+ To oaAOE rWLrrax r TOTAL AREA = 5 8S5scres _ air r MAX r trAx r AREA LOT 1 = 1.966aerss TESTROLE DATA U"'EL`' A ' TWL APPR AREA LOT 2 = 1782 acres v+^x r Prt OVED PPE 20- AEAA LOT s - 0.980 acres LOAM as IW x r Plrctt AREA LOT 4 = 1099 acres 9AN0 AND WAVEL{.5' e a /I — E, J00 e0.Pr. II�1L coANSE sAND NouaE SIDE WML AREA u,. LFACIfN! PaOL r CDANSE SAND LEA'OOL MN I do certify that this map was made by us from actual .T' c surveye completed—_4AH tar — and that ad concrete monuments have been LANDg ROAD rtaN aACIetL yATFAIAL Tn eE (or will be) set ashown thus ■ hereon. �2y�,ID S, ME,,�9 aaAs tush r oaAVEL— o TYPICAL PLS PAN amuawA — v Signatur o veyor x�i°x uueAn � ` � �E,,""p',e TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM arADE AMY AaOVFnaaD 49e1g JO lEV6. FOF NE,N aaAOE °E uTeGL ro eE wee nn 4 ewe This is to certify that the subdVision plan has been approved T� mow _ by the pheysng board of the Town of Southold by resolution 0 of AWovat dated D FEB 2 6 19A2 by Plammirp Board WA IN a0i1Rg CASM wt:tt �Q IANO SU • 2y t. me?. LF` APPLICANT: — wnH I �� �9 A PETROL STATIONS, INC. A.Ml11DlLE CIO THOMAS 1 GORMAN LOVE LANEPrepared in accordance with the minimum i N Y.S LIC. NO. 49618 MATTI'rum,, N Y. TYPICAL WELL DETAIL standards for title surveys ss established by the L.LA.L.S. and approved and adapted EYORS, P.C. ELEVATIONS AND CONTOUR LMS ARE REFERENCED for each by The New York State Land TO TOPOGRAPHIC OF FIVE EASTERN TOWNS. �Titb Asaociatian. eiP O. B X 908 Rtvr�r o rG / y v MAIN ROAD A'ev a e e z SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 86 — 650 C Nml til IU 23 0 a J I to, u � 'o LOT 4 i LOT 3 \ \ 7 25'Right of nN Way rY�o N o e j yk qj 25' R16'HT OF WAY /� ' pi mss« _ ~moo ti N o O � :6 Pavem¢r'1' 4/r ON It LOT 2s PLAN OF ENTRANCE " SCALE 1'=20' 139 v : `l rc. 4ge Proposed 9rao c W4 0 ��j F' Oc� LOT r PLAN � k �h \ SCALE 1 s0' 2/ 9 ¢ SQ h L ` /G./ k d' a I c P P/=22 SS PY pe. Ar- 2242 vr- s L3 6 DRAINAGE CALCUL ATIONS VGr Ho vvc Ac= 24 ''? PAVEMENT = 12,562sq. II. 3+4a 2 3m �- 4c' vvc 4'O z3 os o ,o 0,3o OTHER = 4742 sq. II. Zo.93 za.o�i ��^ V = ARC "I A = AREA o aro e,ea h R = 2" RUNOFF y,ade C = COEFFICIENT RUNOFF w m,^ ct 12,562x 0.17 x l.0 = 2136 cu. fl. 4 742 x 0.17 x 0.3 = 242 r c Y 2378 1397s o 2378/68.4 = 35. V.F. � u Q PROVIDE 3 L.P.s 10012' DEEP 2 w PLAN & PROFILE ti 25'RIGHT OF WA Y PETROL STA TIONS L TD. Q � � PROFILE o Q) PE � - A T CUTCHOGUE SCALE : VERT. 1" = 10' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TYPICAL CROSS SECTION HORiz 1If so' SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. ROADWAY 1000 - 109 - 01 - 23 JAN. 14, 1992 / //2" asphalt wearing course .L3 10 IIJI� JUL 2 //2" asphalt binder course LR OLDTO SOWN \A1F'�SP 4" compacted Thickness stone blend or crushed concrete base pI,pNNINDR0AR0 /"�iy,Sir's�� a_ p N.Y.S. LIC. NO. 49618 A ��. CO 's.` RS, P.C. 7/12/92 ( revisions 1 S 1/971 86-650D I I — , Ind LS lh aBOMU SITE--� SOUTKEY MAP P " qtJ PIAN nKn Scale 1"=600' ��� � SUBDI VISION FOR IL �O,e ° /�,°jep���p` cl°' a pe `y PE TROL S TA TIONS L TD. ° p A T CUTCHOGUE ,Ole cbn do- � KGa /�pa�e° eery TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �p�04, 0k ,e�"dAs o�U 5� � '/d�°'e ;°50`°n SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y. a e " �eo�P00 py 1000 logit 01 r 23 so, a / °le 0,1' eeE Scale 1 = 100 �l°,e a / M1a\ , \ �' 20 / M1+�°P,EO Jan, 12, 1987 �' Gyp '9 June 27, 1990(revised lots) 1 yob \ \ I °le Jan. 22, 1991(revised lots) \ E a1 I t+l e ° I L June 28, 1991 (revised J v� ✓an. 16,1992bevised) 20 ar 00 mrA y7� Dec. 1,1992 (revised) April 26, 1993 (revised) Aug. 20, 1993 (Wells 8 C.P.$) % Aug. 25, 1994 ( 3 Lots 8 Sanitary Design) Q, I �� cD -01,4 Ase O . �v � t �7y�0 \ 56 N •1 ! Ni v, \v s %i\,. $a tl\d�eds c. q, i V° t0 1 fid, i h� VpvOA96 AW5 N IoM 1610 \g4 'L �(I u 4 ]` P.. ; \„ °e J- 10 g9 p as o. O '� '-� �Zg5• � T N Ip Ir .h Zs9� plpl . �, SANITARY DESIGN B7 >C\, I A ,�t4 l BEDROOM APARTMENT 225 g.p.d. 9D bn 0E 49 / ,, e�{ aL cY OFFICE (Real Estate) 4 occupants I co'I 1Apee ttY' T / ��'Y M`� '/ rto `I^° #a `Jl 4 • 12 g.p.d. 273 le µ0 �E a e P s, ., \ ,s° pg 2 �,0 .1Jp o•, � G 4pG 4p z g o°yo R OFFICE (Archlfecls) 6 occupgnfs y tsA yEO t s os s: 00 e° �5 s • Iz g.p.d /2 g.p.d. O _aA� 1 Q5 �O k zit OJNOTE• LOT g TO HAVE NO DRIVEWAY '0P ACCESS TO MAIN ROAb ( S. R 21 OQ b CA TPI3 EA TO GRADE °\\ T I.N. r NH I TOTAL AREA = 5.895acres `� D cwxlNEr I e•"X r NAz G�nELOT l excluding R.O. W. 54,005 sq.11, rrsr ,!WELL IIaET Lfta - - - R0" rLN�' total 57,510 sq,lR HOLE DATA i APPROVED PPE - 1/4"X 1'FTE I — .. APPROVED PPE °a LOT 2 flog 57,816 sq.ft. LOAM 3.]' a Us,-X T PITCH total 59,488 sq.fl. SAND AND GRAVEL a]' n° _ _ __ LOT 3 excluding R.O.W /23,554 sq.ft. ` 137,232 sq.ft. / ,.,',� _ 3��rT' ',M°,x, COARSE SAND ,/ HOUSE SDE WALL AREA LEACHNO POOL SETA 10' MIN —-' 3' COARSE SAND LEACHING MIN ,N I do certify that this map was made by us from actual I,. RDD surveys completed JAN rt roe? �,';' - - C and that dl concrete monuments have been :�I '•'?'-k�-_ ROAD — (Or WlN bel set as shown thus osteon. °e�',"" ` "'" ` yla, eACKELL WTERIAL TO BE 7 G 4y„� -- CLEAN SAND i GRAVEL ill y TYPICAL PLOT PLAN °pO N°wA_ Signator o veyor �, 411 wArae non a%xnur GeAw af MrAeoVrAanow OOO TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM \� ': • , L �D °ae10E THE WATER SLPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL °A10rODUSE urmAt ro as FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS N THIS DEVELOPMENT ,� °� ,w.. COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS A REOUIREMENTS Thio ie t0 certify that the subdivision plan has been approved snowi\inm OFT SIFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEAL TA by the phnrting board of the Town of Southold by resolution of approval dated by Chairman PIannkV Board G401M wA FAQ./.G..'d/i lj. y"^IL, COMING WELL II* rAH 99 to}' APPLICANT: stPeEL sc�aeEa The locgtions al wells and aesapools PETROL STATIONS, INC. — °Pup shown hereon are from field observations C/O THOMAS J GORMAN and or from data obtained from others, �/ '' H '+' ✓ LOVE LANE MATTITUCK, N Y Prepared in accordance with the minimum - TYPICAL WELL DETAIL standards for title surveys as established - "�f #YS. LIC. NO. 49818 by the L.LA.L.S. and approved and adopted pECONIC URVEYORS, P.C. ELEVATIONS AND CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED for such use by The New York State Land TO TOPOGRAPHIC OF FIVE EASTERN TOWNS Title Association. 765 - 5020 on. 6 BOX 809 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 86 - 650 C