Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-108.-4-11.3 (3)
ENGINEERING ~ CONSTRUCT]ON, 100 HILLTOP RON), P~MSEY, NJ 07446 ~31-934-2828 Sprint Spectrum L.P. SPRINT VERIZON: AT&T WIRELESS POWER: TELCO: SWITCH: SITE: A/E: IMPLEMENTATION: COLOCATION: AMY NOLLER (201) 684-4009 JOHN GOMEZ (917) 750-1454 ALEX DEFRANGS (201) 576-2255 KEYSPAN - BOB DELANEY (FILE: 65559040)(651) 548-7045 CONRAD HOENIG (631) 687-8522 (516) 827-2800 WILLIAM BAXTER (561) 225-4492 PETER PAPAY (201 934-2828 PROJECT CONTACTS F9 T SITE NUMBER: SiTE ADDRESS: OWNER: CO-APPLICANTS: NY53XC688/958283 ELIJAH'S LANE & ROUTE 25 SOUTHOLD, NY WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. 1030 E. PUTNAM AVENUE GREENWICH, CT 06830 SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. CROSSROADS CORPORATE INTERNATIONAL BLVD., STE. MAHWAN, NJ 074.95 NYSMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA: VERIZON WIRELESS FKA: BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE 60 HERRIOKS ROAD MINEOLA, NY 11501 CENTER 800 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BEING ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND AND PREMISES LOCATEID IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK IN TFIE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD KNOWN AS LOT 11.3 IN BLOCK 4, SECTION 108, DISTRICT 1000. COORDINATES (NAD 85): LATITUDE: 4-0' 59' 57.9" LONGITUDE: 72" 50' 39.2" ELEVATION: 50' AMSL CURRENT ZONIING: LB - LIMITED BUSINESS PROJECT SUMMARY' wire/ess Sprint Spectrum L.P Crossroods Corporote Center 1 Internebonaf Blvd., Ste 800 Mahwah, New Jersey 07495 Phone: (201) 512-4700 Fax, (201) 512-4715 ;~, APPROVED BY PLANNING ~ ~,~',D TOWN OE ~ '~ ;' ' ~ ~wireless 60 HERRICKS ROAD MINEOLA, NY 11501 (516) 294-1090 ]1259 DRAWN BY NO DATE ISSUE 0 07/12/00 APPROVAL SHEET NUMBER T-1 DESCRIPTION TITLE SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN AND NOTES S-lA KEY MAP S-2 COMPOUND PLAN, ELEVATION AN~ DETAILS S-3 DETAILS 5-4 DETAILS SHEET INDEX UI4AUTHORiZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE~ NEW YORK STATE E~LICAf~ON LAW. REVISION DATE AUG ~ 1 2000 Southo]d lbwn Planting Board N,Y, PROFESSIONA[ ENGINEER NO, OH-690 APPROVALS PROJECT MANAGER; DATE; SPDNTREP: VERIZON REP:_. DATE; MATTITUCK NY55XC688/958285 ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25 SOUTHOLD, NY DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 BLOCK 4, LOT 11.3 TITLE SHEET ~HEBT NUMBER ANTENNA SCHEDULE (ALL CARRIERS) ELEVATION AND QUANll]Y OF ANTENNAS, CANRIER ANTENNA MODEL AND STA'flJS REFERENCE SECTORS PER SECTOR AZIMUTHS COMMENTS SPRINT DBgBOHflOT2EM (PROPOSED) 110' (TOPS) 5 5 540, 110, 250 GPS UNff AT 110' CURRENTLY THREE ANTENNAS E~Sq' PER AT~T WIRELESS SERVICES N.P 11011-N (EXlS'I]NG) 98' (CENERUNE) 3 4 50, 150, 240 SECTOR. FOUR ARE PROPOSED, PER SECTOR. EXI591NG 1/g-JlRS ON EXiST1NG POLE TO BE NEXTEL SMR-O8-09011-OO (PROPOSED) 90' CroPs) 3 4 30. 15o, 270 ~EPLACED wr[H PANEL ANTENN~ SHOWNI HERF VERIZON WIRELESS ALPg011[ (PROPOSED) 80' (TOPS) 3 4 102, 222, 342 GPS uNrr AT SHELTER ROOF MOUNTED llGlff TO POLE USING TB-BRACKET OI~NIROINT EMS RRgO-17-OODP (EXISTIflG) 65' (TOPS) 3 1 30, 150, 270 ASSEMBLIES AND 1~J-SECTOR ASSEMBUES ///~/ 00DON 31§ RADMELS ROAD CONNELLY & MASTON 535 ELIJAH'S LANE MA~IIIUCK, NY 11952 ~ EXISTING UTILITT "% /~ (WP.) ~,, t ~. ~ %,, / ~ trus ~ /' %~,-'0 ~.,. ~ PRIOR TO THE SO~SSlDN OR ~ BiD, mE mN~cmR ~AtL ~smf THE PR~ECT RiTE AND FAMILIARIZE HI.ELf e)TH ~LL CONDITIONS ~FE~TfNG ~E OENE~ ~STRUCTON ~~ ~ WORK ~Y BE ACC~PLBHED AS DEPIC~D ON THE CO~CT ~CUMENTS, Sprint SpectrumL.P PBOR m PROCEEDING ~TH THE W~K FOx: (20 1~ 51 2-471 3 ~ ~ '~ ~Y THE CONT~ ~C~ENTS, ~ EXIST. UT)LI~ '~ / / ~ tme ~ HUN~R ~ ' ~ (oppmx.) --, 55 SUNDANCE DRIVE ~%~ ~. .~ 13, THE CONT~TOR SHALL NO~ mE CONST~CT.N M~mER ~l P~D~TS OR ~,~, COS COD, CT 06807-1809 N 5~ UND~QROUND ,~ ~ ITEMS NOTED ~ 'EXISTING" WHICH ARE NOT FOUNO TO BE mN iRE hELD , ~ /~$/ / INSTAtLED IN ACCO~ANC[ Wl~ ALL ~PM~BL[ B~NfCIPA ~ND ~ATE JURSDiCDO~ MINEOLA, NY 11501 VERIZON ORIENTATION //' /' /.- /.. NEICNLEY 27 CASE AVENUE ,¢/¢ PATCHOGUE, NY 11772 // , ~ //// / // PLm / ,/ / ¢ ~ ,/ EKIS~NG 1 STORY -BLOCK IELECOM / / * /' BUILDING TO REMAIN // EXI~ING 1 8TORY ~ ,/ ~ -AGGREGATE TELECOM BUILDING TO REMAIN,/-' HILLIARD & GONZALEZ P O. BOX 248 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1%20' GRAP~irc S C AE,lql, WILLIAM J. BA~TER, JR. 1030 EAST PUTNAM AVENUE GREENWICH, CT 06830 BULK REQUIREM ZONING DJSfl{IOT: LB - UMffED BUSINESS PERMITED OR LOT 11,3, ~ 4. SECT, 108, DIST. 1000 REQUIRED DIN. LOT AREA (SQ. FT.) 80.000 ~N. LOT WIDIH (F~i) 175 ~IN, LOT DEPTH (FEEl] 250 DIN. FRON~ YARD (EEO 100 alN, SI~ Y~, aE/~ (FI) 2D/~5 DIN. R~ YARD (EEO 75 LANDSCAPE AREA (%) 55 LOT CO~RAGE (%) 20 ~x. BUILDINO I~EIGHT (EEO 35 EXISI1NG PROPOSED 80,507 NO CHANGE 197.5 NO CHANGE 474.2 70,2 NO CHANGE 4.6/5g,,~ NO CHANGE 231 NO CHANGE >5~ -2,1B 12,6 +,6 100 110 LEGEND -- Lff;HT LINES DENOTE EXISTING CONDITIONS -- HEAW UNES DERO'~ PROPOSE D CONDmOI --E-- ROW[R WIRING --T-- TELEPHONE WIRINg -- - EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES --31-- EXISTING CONTOUR UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDffI04 TO THIS DOCUMENT IS A VlOUTION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCA~ON LAW. PETER E. PAPAY N.Y, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO, 064.690 I P,E,P. NO DATE o o7/12/oo 15~UE APPROVAL APPROVALS PROJECT MANAGER: DATE: SPRINT REP: DATE: VERIZON REP: DATE: MATFITUCK NY53XC688/958285 ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25 SOUTHOLD, NY DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 BLOCK 4, LOT 11.5 SITE PLAN AND NOTES S SPRINT PPG GABINEI- ~D UCHTING CANOPY EQUIPMENT EXISTING OMNipoINT EQUIPMENT ON CONCRE1E PAD SPRINT ON CONCRETE PIERS FENCE ~0 MATCH EXISTING 'i~EETO BE REMO~.D (1YP. FOR 3) 12' X BO'VERIZON 110' REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE EXISTING 100' MONOPOLE~ TO BE REMOVE]) PROVIDE NB CABLE Er~IIW PORT ON BOTH SIDES OF WN~. MICRON.EST MODEL 01118 WELDED 1 5/8" O.D. ACCESS BATE FRAMES- TIdP, ? 1/4"e (1 5/8" O.D) SCHEDULE 40 I:'PEI -- TYPICAL DRAI::E 3 STRANDS CALV. 4 POINT BARBED WIEE TOP HINDE PER MFR, 17P, 2'x2"-11 GA, OALV. WOVEN WiRE FABRIC O B'-O' MAX, FABRIC TO TOUCH GROUND BETWEEN POSTS V2" CROWN BFF SURFACE TREATMENT DETNL 9 go. TENSIOh AT BOlTOM BO'iTOM HINGE PE~ MFR. - 1YP, CONC FOOllNG 8' DIA, - TYP, -- 1'-0' DIA. O CORNER & GATE P05~S 4000 PSI CONCRETE MAPLE 10" BLACK X EXIST, UNDERGROUND IN CONDUIT PROVIDE POWER FOR FM ~H'I1NG XISllNO WHITE PINE (~P.) ~_EXISllNG RED CEDAR (~P) COMPOU D P .N, SCALE; 1 =10 GRAPHIC SCALE ( ~ )'S~? ) GATE JENTER DROP ROD & F/JSHROOM SOCKET 2 7/B"O,D, GAlE ~ CORNER pOSiS _ FENCE & GATE DETAIL BO. ALB NONE 1.ALL FENCING & RELATED ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE GALVANIZEO ZINC FINISH (BARB WIRE-ASTM A121, FABRIC-ASTM A392-84, FRAME WORN-ASTM F669-81, ADHERING TO TABLE II, I-C,) PROVIDE SURFACE 1REATNETNT COMPOUND Et'TENSION AND f-O' BEYOND JNDERGROUNDUTIUllES ELECI~IC & UNDERGROUND (approx.) 3~ 230' true (oppmx,) EXISTING IUCTION MARRING DEIE~MINAIION IS J PENDING, CONTACT SPRI~ FOR FAA OBb'llRUCTION- I MAR~,RO AND FAILURE MONITORING REI~JIRE~IENTS, FAA STROBE AND MARKER LIGHTS 110'± ~8'± 90':~ 80'± 65',~ SPRINT ON CONCRETE PIERS w/ EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT SHEETER (BEYOND) 12' X BO' VERIZON HELTER SPRINT BPS ~ IlO' -- SPRINT PANEL ANTENNA FOR 9, 6 SHOWN) RELOCA~ (9) AT&T ANTENNAS. INSTALL NEW ANIta, INA PER SECTOR. MA, INTAIN HORIZONTAIL SE~ANATION N~EL PANEL ANTEN~ (IYP, FOR 12, 8 SHOWN) PANEL ANTENNA FOR 12, 8 SHOWN) RELOCATED OMNIPOINT ANTENNA (WP. FOR 3) 1 lO' REPLAC~ENT MONOPOLE. SEE NOTES EXISTING NEXTEL EQUIPMENT {BEYOND) r CHAIN UNK FENCE MATCH EXISTINg) EXISTINGOMNIPOINT CONCRETE PAD COAXIAL CABLES w/SN~P-IN HAN(BERS TRAPEZE ~ 4'-0" SSE NO~ ~1 BURNBY IYPE GAR CLA~P BOND TO ~NOUND RING WA'V~GUIDE CHANNEL MODEL B501 AB NF'D BY MICROFLECT WA~GUIDE CHANNEL TO E HEAl) JU~ER PiPE HEAD MODEL 8509 AS B BY MIOROFLECT 3'¢, STD. WI PIPE MIC~OFLECT PiPE SUPPORT CLAMP MODEL B142 MI~OFLECT SNAP-IN ADAPTE~ MODEL B1717 EXISTING CONCREE ELECTRIC SERVICE CONDUITS TO SPLICE BOX ~ UTILITY PO(~ EXISTINGUNDERGROUND IELCO ~0 UTiLIW POLE APPROXIMATE LOCATION UNDERGROUND SPLICE BOX BY BELL A'I~ANTlC /*/*~EXISTIN(G 6' HIBH CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ 1' OF BARBED WIRE ELEVATI.O BOAL~ 1 =20 SEE SEQilENCE BELOW FOR ANTICIPATED SEQUENCE OF MONOPOE REPLACEMENT EVENTS, SEE REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS FOR REPLACE~IENT NONOPOLE FOUNDATION DRAYNNGS AND DEIAILS. MONOPOLE REPLACEMENT SEqUeNCE OF EVENTS 1. MEET WITH EACH CARRIER ON S~TE TB DISCUSS CONSTRUCTION SCHEDU. E" 2. INSTALL NEW MONOPOLE FOUNDATION, REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE, ANTENNA MOUNTS, GROUNDING ACCESSORIES AND FAA LIGHTING. INSTALL AND GROUND NEW ANTENNAS FOR ALL CARRIERS ON REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE. NEW ANTENNAS SHALL BE IDENTICAL !0 THE EXISTING ANTENNAS (EXCEFT NEXTEL). MATCH EXISTING AZIMUTHS AND DOWNllLT ANGLES, NEBlEL ANTENNAS SHALL BE REPLAC~O AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, 4 INSTALL NEW AND EXTENDED CABLE ~IppoRT BRIDGES INSTALL AND GROUND NEW CABLES FOR ALL CARRIERS AND ANTENNAS. NEW CABLES SHALL BE IDENTICAL TO TBE EXISTING CABLES FOR MAKE AND SIZE. 6. SWEEP TEST NEW CABLES. 7. COORDINATE CABLE CHANGEOVER WITH EACH GABRJER. B DISMANTLE AND REMOVE EXISTING CABLES AND ANTENNAS FROM EXISTiN[ MONOPOL£ 9. DISMANTLE AND REMOVE EXISTING MO~OPOLE" CABLE BRIDGE 1. PROVIDE SNAP-IN ADAPTERS AND PIPE LEG SUPPORT CLAMPS AS REQUIRED TO ROUTE CABLES TO SPRINT EQUIPMENT, T X 1 STANE ~ 2 X 6 Ppm, ESBURE TREATES LUMBER AT FULL PERIMETER OF NEW SURFACE lREAT~ENT DETAIl BONd~: NONE DENSE ORADED AB~RE, GATE, FiRM UNYIELDING SUBGR, N)E jURFACE TREATMENT ,._FILTER FABRIC. MIP,~q 5aox OR APPROVES EOUAL DETAil SCALE', NONE PROVIDE SURFACE TREATMENT WITHIN ENTIRE FENDED COMPOUND AND f-o" BEYOND, ON ALL SIDES, EXISTING CEIUNC OP~I~ WFFH B195 ALUMILASq'mc SEALANT APPLY "P~MACUM" B18,~ SF.~UNO T~E WALL OPENING BEFORE WAVECUDE ~¥ ~NT IH~ON C/~LE TENSION BANDS ~ 14' O/C 'TE~IBDNBAI~ F.O~E ~NUCKLED GROUND CONNECTION FILTER FABRIC. MIRAR 500X OR APPROVED EQUAL SURFACE 'TREAll, tENP', MATCH EXISllND SURFACE IN OlltER ANEAB PROVIDE WARNING TAPE 1REATIvlENT __ SELECT GRANULAR ELL SELECT ,)P~ULAR RLL 3"~ SCHEDUIF 40 PVC ELEC~IC SERVICE W/ CABLES s _2>UNDERGROUND 4"~ SCHEDULE 40 PVC TELEPHONE SERVICE W/ PULL-ROPE AND WIRE NOTES: UTILITY TRENCH DETAIl. SCALE: NONE PROVIDE 1/4" POLYPROPYLENE PULL ROPE FOR ENTIRE TELEPHONE RUN. COORDINAE UTILITY RUN WITH EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES. UTILIZE AN INDEPENDENT LnTILI~ LOCATING SERVICE, 4. RESTORE ALL SURFACES TO ORIGINA. CONDITION 5, CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80, BO-RESISTANT WHERE EXPOSED TO ATMOSPHERE. 3. REMOVE & HAUL OFF-SITE ALL EXCESS SITE SOIL. SIDE NEXTEL 02 REQUIRED) FRONT ANTENNA ELEVATION SOALE: 1/~"--t'-O' MANUFACTURER' ANDREW CORPORATION MODEL: SMR-OS-OgOll-OD 90', 11 dBd PANEL HEIGHT 4~.9" WIDTH: 10.5" DEPTH' 5.0" WEIGHT: 18.0 LBS. COOBOlNAT[ POINT OF ANTENNA C~LES WITH AT&T WAVECUIDE ENTRY UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. PROVIDE WAVEOUIDE BOUT & CUSHIONS (TY~.) PROVIDE SEAUNG CAPS AT UNUSED OPENIN~ (17P.) MICROFLECI WA~(~UIDE ENTRY PORT MODEL ~Blll8 (WP, BOTH SIDES) PROVIDE FRAMED OPENING IN WAN.. PORT OR CORE-DRILL EXIB~NG WAIl BAR. SEE DWG. E-3 DETAIl SCALE: 1/2"=f-o" PETER E, PAPAY N,Y. PROFESSIONAl. ENGINEI~t NO. 06~go -Sprint Sprint Spectrum L.P. Crossroods Corporate Center 1 Internotionol Bird., Ste. 800 Mahwah, New Jersey 07495 Phone: (201) 512-4700 Fax: (201) 512-4715 wireless 60 HERRICKS ROAD MINEOLA, NY 11501 (516) 294-1090 1239 0 07/12/00 APPROVAL APPROVALS PROJECT ~ANAGER: DATE; SPRINT REP:_ DATE: VERIZON 'REP: DATE: MATllTUCK S~ NUMBBI: NY53XC688/958285 ELIJAH'S LANE & RT SOUTHOLD, NY BLOCK & LOT: DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 BLOCK LOT 11.3 25 COMPOUND PLAN, ELEVATION AND DETAILS ~ WG,/~ & PIER * 6 EQUAL SPACES = 18'-9 1/2" AT E-CELL m / m I I PPG CABINET L ~Jw8 X 18 BAROHOLE~ FOR BOLTS W8 X 24 +1" W8 X 24 +I" W8 X 24 +1" 3/8" ~o~ (~.) 9/163 X 1 1/4"L ~OUNTING HOLES FLANI~'S (NOT SHOWN) PCS EQUIPMENT SUPPORT FRAME GRADE LAYOUT ON PIERS DETAIL SCALE: NONE A /3\ L THIS PLAN IS ROTATED FROM THE COMPOUND PLAN. 2 1¢ X 7' OPEN GRATING CANOPY ADOVE 60ED BACKUP 88E0 POWER CABINET 2 POS GROWTH GROWR4 GROWTH COMA OA~]NET C~alNET r_~aINET E-CELL ~1 ~2 ~3 ACCA ACCA ACCA ^CCA 1'-9' 1/2" 2'-2" PCS MOUNTING HOLE LOCATIONS (E-CELL) SEVEN CABINET LAYOUT DETAIL SOALF..: NONE REV./~ NOTE: 1, THE ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF THE GPS UNIT SHALL BE IIq ACOORDANOE WITH THE FINAL RF REPORT. 2. THE GPS UNIT MOUNT IS DESIGNED TO FASTEN TO A STANDARD 1-1/4" DIAMETER. SCHEDULE 40, GALVANIZED STEEL OR STAINLESS STEEL PIPE. THE PIPE MUST NOT BE THREADED AT THE UNIT ~ THE PIPE SHALL BE CUT TO THE REQUIRED LENGTH (MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES) USING A HAND OR ROTARY PIPE CUTFER TO ASSURE A SMOOTH AND PERPENDICULAR: CUT. A HACK ~W ~ THE CUT PIPE END SHALL BE DEBURRED AND SMOOTH IN ORDER TO SEAL AGAINST THE NEOPRENE GASKET ATTACHED TO THE UNIT MOUNT. 3, THE MOUNTING PLATE SHALL BE FABRIOATED AS SHOWN AND A1TACHED TO THE APPROPRIATE SUPPORT STRUCTURE USINO U-BOLTS. THE SUPPORT PIPE SHALL THEN BE All'ACHED TO THE MOUNTING BRACKET USING THE OVERSIZE U-BOLTS PROVIDED TO ALLOW ADJUSllviENT, IT I$ CRITICAL THAT THE GPS UNIT IS MOUNTED SUCH THAT IT IS WITHIN 2 DEGREES OF VERTICAL AND THE BASE OF THE UNIT IS WITHIN 2 DEORE(~S OF L~VEI. BILL OF MATERIALS QUANTITY JTEMf~DESCRIPTION (each) t~ 1-1/4"¢ sch, 40 x 18" LG, MIN SS OR GALV. PIPE 1 {~) CHANNEL - C6 x 8.2 x 60" LO. OALV.(A-36) (~) CHANNEL - C6 x 8.2 x 48" LG. GALV,(A-36) 1 {~) 5/8"¢ BOLT W/ DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND WASHERS, GALV, Q STD, U-BOLT FOR 2"~ PIPE W/ DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND WASHER, GALV, (SEE NOTE 3) 2 0 OPS ClGBE GROUND BAR 60" (TRIM TO LENGTH) E. ONOROLE 1/2'~ 11/18"¢ HOLE FOR 5/8"¢ BOLT WffH DOUBLE NUTS AND WASHERS MOUNTING BRACKET 2 1/8 - I ~1 I--7/8" I i, L NOTE: OVEROIZE U-BOLT PROVIDED ----~-~ ~ TO ALLOW :b 2' TILT/ADJUSTUENT TO __~_~, ,~ql ~. A;HL:~E TOLERANCE ~_~A ~_7/16" X 7/8" SLOTTED HOLE I 1/4'¢ PIPE DETAIL SCALE: NONE i WG, ~ & PIER % ~ PPC P~[R g WB, ~ & PIER ~ WG,/~ & PIER PROV)DE RE)JOVABLE SE¢llON OF I/4" DIAMOND P~TE AT ALL FUTURE EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS OYP,) w8 w/ ~--(~) ~/4'~ (NS ~ FS) SECTION SCALE; NONE (NS a PS) (TYP.) SECTION BP_ALE NONE -CB ~8 UNIT (SUPPUED BY LUCENT) DOUBLE CHANNEL (4) 5/8"¢ BOLTS CADWELD CONNECTION AT PIPES AND 1/4" GALV, PLATE) HOLES FOR ADJUSTMENT AWG BO1 #2 AWG BCW'-~. GROUNDING KIT 1/2"¢ COAX CABLE MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS PER MANUFACTURER'S STAIqDARD gA6 AWG GROUNDING KIT BLE (PROVIDED WITH KIT) TO MIGB GPS UNIT IMOUNTING BRACKET SPRINT ANTENNA 8CHEDULE Q'IY, ANT, ~ ]]dL~._~)~,~ FUllIRE ~B~80~g~2E-~ 2 DBgBOH90T2E-N 2 I D~BOHO~2E-N 2 FURNIBHED ~LUDENT 1. ANTENNAS LISTED NAY VARY, DEPENDING ON SYSTEM PERFORMANCE. 2. ANTENNA HEIGHTS SHOWN ARE TO TOPS OF ANTENNAS, 5000 PSI GROUT ~5/4' W/ (4) 3/~"¢ X mRF_.N)ED RODS W/ LEVEUNO GA=g" E/~H WAY, 4" PR~E~ON CLEAR 3/,¢ × 118' e 1 ~I~8 GRAT1NO FASTENERS o Q~Y, ~ QIY, CADRES Q~Y. CABLES 3 ~ 1 0/c 8PRl~n' EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS ~JIDTR DEPTH CABINET (INCHES) (INCHES) 10' O/C 2'-0'I~ Y' CLEAR PIEI? SECTION SCALE: NONE 4000 PSi POWE~ PROTECllON CABINET (PPG) POWE~ C~INET (TYPICAL) 48 6'-8 5/4" 31 20/l 1 3O HEIGHT (INCHES) $0 66 WEIGHT (POUNDS) 250 1600 BAFIER¥ C~JNET 31 30 60 2880 PRIMARY R.aDIO C.~gINET 30 30 60 850 ANTSNN~ C~LE COVER ASS'Y (ACG 35 29 14 40 GRO~FH C/~lt, Lq' (TfPIGAL) 22 30 60 750 ~3 x 2-~ T~L~O I 'LAN 4'-0" CLASS 4 SOIL OR BETTER: (UBO TABLE 18-1-A) PPC W,NLL MOUNTED POWE~ PROTECTION CABINET NOR1HERN ~CHHOLOOIBS- PART NO, N2101-W01 PAPAY ENGINEERING ~ CONSTRUCTION, INC, E)R 3 ~0 P~ CONCREIE FOO~INO MINI MOUNTING FRAMF FOR 7 PLACES), "-Ts3x2x 1/4 ND SEAT ~--, D AIL SOALE, NONE REV,//~ JGHTING RXllJRE -Sprin Sprint Spectrum L.P. Crossroads Corporate Center 1 International Blvd., Ste. 800 Mahwah, New Jersey 07495 Phone: (201) 512-4700 Fax: (201) 512-4715 wireless 60 HERRICKS ROAD ~INEOLA, NY 11501 (516) 294-1090 SECTION I d,D,P. CHECKED BY I P.E,P. NO DATE 18~IE 0 07/12/00 ~PROV,~. _! LAN E L,EVATI 0 N CANOPY D .AI L TcAL~ ~ 1/4' ~USSET /OYP. FOR 4) / ~8" x 5' x 1/2' / //'-BASE P~TE ~ 5 V2'o,c, scum ~ 40 RPE / " %._5/s", DOLT ' (~. FOR 4) ~E PLA~ ~ ~, FOR ~) 8~V~IZED O~RBGE ~LT ~12262 D~OND ~CHOR B x 8/~8 1/2"¢ bt-BOLT [Pm,) L3 X 3 X 1/4" 8~E REQUIRE)) 3 1/2' O,D. SOHED. OYP.) SIDE SPRINT REQUIRED) SOLID, llNNE~ TO LOWB{ MIOB FRONT ANTENNA ELEVATION BOALE: 1/2%1'-0" MANUFACTURER: DECIBEL PRODUCTS MODEb DB980H90T2E-M, 15 dBd PCS PANEL HEIGHT: 60.0" WIDTH: 6.0" DEPTH: 2.75" WEIGHT: 8 5 LBS. EXTERIOR UGHT)NG R)CFLIRE 60 M~VFE~MER 1/~' × 1/2" BELL R~)UOER AT TOP WT. PIPE THRBADB) Y x 1/4" w/ BOLTS HO~rS FOR TS3X2X 1/4AT SUPPOET POST EXTERIOR LIGHTING MAST SC,N.F.: UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION 1'O THIS DOCUMENT IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW, PETER E. PAPAY N.Y. PROF~SSIONN. I~IGINEER NO, 064690 APPROVALS PROJECT MANAGER: . DATE: SPRINT REP: DATE: VERIZON REP: DATE: sr~ ~E MATTITUCK NY33XC688/958283 ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 2. SOUTHOLD, NY DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 BLOCK 4, LOT 11.3 DETAILS S m ~/~ & REAM 10'-10" OL~UNE OF 12" X 12" X BEARING ('D'PICAL FOR 6 COflCREIE P~ BROOM POUR DOOR PABAFTER INSTALLA~ON AND FASTB~ING-'. OF SHELLER ~1/4"/Fi', SLOPS FILTER FANRIC. MIRAFI 500X OR APPROVED EQU~ WWF 6x6-W2.gxWZ9- < FOUNDATION PLAN SGALE: 1/4"=1'-0' SEE DWG S-2 FOR SHELTER LOCATION AND ORIENTATION. STANDARD PANELS WITH AGGREGATE RNISH ALL AROUND' GABLE PORT- &C, UNff A.O. UNIT 7 INTEGRAL ' SWITCH RECEPTACLE < LEFT ELEVATION SC~E: 1/4'--1'-0" /-'FF EXHAUST LOUVE~ F-3" X 4'-3" < RIGHT ELEVATION SP. ALB GRADE REAM VERIZON ANTENNA SCHEDULE MECHANICAL .~,~'OR J AZIMUTH ~ ~ FEED ANI~NNA ALPHA 1 10~ 80' ~0~ ~E ~ BO~ ~9011 B~A 2 ~ 80' ~ ~E O' BO~ ~g011 G~ - AT SH~R ~F ~RNISH~ BY LUC~ 1l. ANTENNAS LISTED MAY VARY, DEPENDING, ON SYSTEM PERFORIIANCE, 2. ANTENNA HEIGHTS SHOWN ARE TO TOPS OF ANTENNAS. GRADE BEAM STEEL SHELIER F1ETE~ FABRIC, MI~ 50OX ~2) )~4 CONT. OR APPROVED EQUAL 4" BED OF CRUSHE~ STONE BY COMPACTED IN SffU SOIL >FOUNDATION STIRRUPS AT SECTION SCALE: 1/2'=1'-0" l----- ~ 3/&"¢ HOOKED BEARING 3/4'~j r-- ~ PLATE ?LATE DETAIL SCAL!~ 1. PROVIDE (6) BEARING PLATES VERIZON (12. REQUIRED) ANTENNA ELEVATION SCALE; MANUFACTURER. SWEDCOM CORPORATION MODEL: ALP-E 901I-DIN ENHANCED LOG-PERIODIC ANT~NA HEIGHT ~Y' WIDTH: 6 5" DEPTH. 8" WEIGHT (INCLUDING BRACKETS)' 20 LBS. Y-3" x 3'-3" FUEL FlU- B" X 12 ~" MUFFLER-~ -I FASCIA [!~DM < REAR ELEVATION SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" LIGHtiNG FIX[URE D < FRONT ELEVATION SCALe 1/4."=1'-0" STEEL NOTE8 1 2. 3. 4. 5 B 7 g lO. 12, 15, INCORRECTLY FABRICATED, DAMAGED OR OTHERWISE MISFITTING OR NON-CONFORMING MATERIALS OR CONDITIONS SMALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMEDIAL DR CORRECT,YE ACIlOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION "SPECIFICATION FOR THE DESIGN, FABRICATION AND ERECTION DF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR BUILDINGS", LATEST EDITION. STRUCTURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM AB6, "STRUCTUHAL STEEL", LATEST EDITION, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ALL PIPES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A501 OR A53 GRADE B (Fy=35 ksi MINI. A5OO GRADE B MAY BE USED IF A501 OR A53 STEEL IS NOT AIIAILABLE ALL TUBES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A500 GRADE B (Fy=46 ksi) ALL THREADED RODS SHALL BE AD6, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SHOP CONNECTIONS SHALL BE WELDED OR BOLTED. FIELD CONNECTIONS SHALL BE BOLTED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ALL BOLTED CONN[CqONS SHALL BE MADE W[H NIGH STRENGTH BOLTS STRUCIlJRAL CONNECTION BOLLS SHALL BE HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS AND SHALL CONFORM TO ASTN A325 "HIGH STHENBTFI BOLTS FOR STRUCTURAL JOINTS, INCLUDING SUWABLE NUTS AND PLAINI HAROENED WASHERS", LATEST EDITION. BOLTS SHALL BE 5/8" DU~v~ETER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED NUTS SHALL BE HEAVY HEX. A LOCKING DEVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL STEEL TO SIEEL CONNECTIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH AWS C, ODE FOR PROCEDURES, APPEARANCE, QUALITY OF WELTS AND FOR METHODS USED IN CORRECTIVE WELDING. ALL WELDERS AND WELDING PROCESSES SHALL BE QUALIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS "STANDARD QUALIFICATION PROCEDURES" ALL WELDS SHALL BE WITH [TO ELECTRODES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL STEEL, BOLTS AND U-BOLTS SHALL BE HOT-DIP RALVANIZEB AFTER FABRICATION CONFORMING ASTM A153. TRIMMED ENDS OF STEEL AND DISTURBED SURFACES SHALL RECEIVE A COAT OF Z R.C COLD GALVANIZING COMPOUND AS MANUFACTURED BY Z.R.C CHEMICAL PRODUCTS CO., QUINCY, MASS. ALL SPECIAL~( ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS. ALL MASTS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS (WITHOUT SPLICE) AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONCRETE NOTE 1. CONCRETE CONSTRNGTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE &MERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE "BUILDLNG CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE (ACI 318-D5) AND COMMENTARY AGI BIRR-95" 2~ CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SHALL BE NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM COMPRESSWE STRENCTII OF ¢000 PSI AT 28 DAYS SLUMP SHALL BE 4 INCHES (~1 ]NCLI). AIR ENTRAINMENT SHALL BE 8%. B. CONCRETE REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE GRADE 60 DEFORMED BARS AND SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM SPECIFICATION A 615 WITH A MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH Fy=6O ksi. WELDED WIRE FABRIC REINFORCEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A82 AND SHALL HA~ A MINIMUM Fy=70 ksi. 4. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER FOR REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: A) 3" FOR FOUNDATDN BOTTOM BARS AND VERTICAL BARS. 5. MINIMUM LAP SPLICES SHALL BE 40 BAR DIAMETERS. i 6. CONCRETE INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER SPRINT AND VERIZON STANDARDS. FOUNDATION NOTE6 1. FOUNDATIONS SHALL BEAR ON UNDISTURBED NATURAL SOIL OR COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL HAVING A MINIMUM ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPAGLTY OF 1500 POUNOS PER SQUARE FOOT, 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY ALL NECESSARY MEASURES TO SAFEGUANR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ADJACENT STRUCTDRES DURING ~CAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF FOUNDATIONS. SIDEWALL STABILIIY OF EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINE9 DUBINB EXCAVATION. ANY UNUSUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO TNE AFTENTION OF THE ENGINEER. ~. BOSOM OF EXCAVATION SHALL BE CLEANER OF LOOSE MATEDAL AND WATER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE. DEWATERING SHALL BE PERFORMED WITHOUT LOOSENING OF THE SUBGRADE N FOOTINGS AND SLABS SHALL BE PLACED ON FIRM, DRY AND NON-FROBEN SUB-GBADE. 5 SEE REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS FOR REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE FOUNDATION DRAWINGS AND DETAILS. SHELTER ANCHORING NOTES 1. THE EQUIPMENT SHELTER AND FOUNDATION INDICATED ARE BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY KULLMAN INDUSTRIES, INC. AVENEL, N.J. (908) 636-1500. 2. INSTALL SHELTER IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S CURRENT PUBLISHED INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. 3 REFER TO DRAWING S-2 FOR SHELTER LOCATION. 4 INSTALL BEARING PLATES FURNISHED WITH SHELTER. WELD SHELTER TO BEARING PLATES ELECTRODES SHALL BE ETOXX OR EBOXX PETER g PAPAY UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. N,Y. PROFESSIONAl. ENGINEER NO. 064690 PN:~AY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCqON, 100 HILLTOP ROAD, P,/~MSEY, I~1 074.46 201-93~-2B28 -,,,Sprint Sprint Spectrum L.P. Crossroads Corporate Center 1 International Blvd., Ste, 800 M~hwoh, New Jersey 07495 Phone: (201) 512-~700 Fox: (201) 512-~715 wireless 60 HERRICKS ROAD MINEOLA, NY 11501 (516) 294-1090 PROJECT NUMBER I J.D.P. CHECKED BY [ P,E,P. NO DATE ISSUE 0 07/12/00 APPROVe. APPROVALS PROJECT MANAGERI DATE: SPRINT REP: DATE: VERIZON REP: . DATE: s~ NA~E MATTITUCK s~ NUMBEE NY33XC688/958283 ELIJAH'S LANE & RT SOUTHOLD, NY DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 BLOCK 4-, LOT 11.3 DETAILS ~HEET NUMBER S 4 25 BLOCK SECTION DIsTEICT LOT 8 MA~N LOT 3 DISTRICT 7 115 I000 1. LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF STRUCTURES OhLOTS OUTSIDE OF PROPER~Y IN QUESqON ARE APPROXI~E, <(~ KEY ~A~ GRAPHIC SCALE ( m tC~T ) (epprox.) PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500' UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITrON TO THIS DOCUMENT IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. N.Y. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO. 064690 JAPA¥ ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, tN( -Sprin( Sprint Sp®ctru~ii L.P. Crossroads Corporate Center 1 International Blvd., Ste. 800 Mahweh, New Jersey 07495 Phone' (201) 512-4700 Fax' (201) 512-4713 ~wireiess 60 HERRICKS ROAD MINEOLA, NY 11501 (516) 294-1090 I J,D.P. 0 07/12/00 APPROVAL APPROVALS PROJECT MANAGER: DATE: SPRINT REP: DATE: VERIZON REP: DATE: s~ ~E ~ATrITUCK NYS3XC688A/958283 ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25 SOUTHOLD, NY DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 BLOCK 4, LOT 11.3 KEY IvlAP S lA PLANT LI~T KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME QTY. SiZE ROOT REMARKS 6'-T B&B FULL UNIFORM BRANCHING r~ ~ OCCIDENT~JS /V~IERICAN /~RBORVITAE 14 HDGHT TREES TO DE PLANTE]) P~-HEP~LLY §' O.C !%2 1/2" B&B FULL UNIFORM BR/~ICHINO ~-~ QUERCUS BOREAUS RED OAK 3 CAUPER FREES TO BE PLANq[D GENERALLY 1T O.C LEGEND LIGHT LINES DENBTE EXISTING CONDITIONS HEAVY UNES DENOTR PROPOSD CONDmONS --E POWER WIRING --T ~HONE WIRING -- - EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILlllES --31-- EXISTING CONTOUR ODDON 3~5 RACH[LS ROAD MA~ITUCK, BY 11959 LAND8CAPE NOTE8 4 / ,% (approx,) "%./ //~5 ~ kx , / N ~, .%, / ~110' .. q~ .... S~ ~ %,, ~ tree 55 SUNDANCE DRIVF ./' % ~%0~ :l ~ UNDERGROUND ~* '/ ' ~ %-. 3~2 t~'5t~ ' / ' o ~ /, / /'~5 ' ~UNDERGROtND P~CTICE ~[B VERIZON ORIENTATION /' ~ :v ~, /'...-' .- ./: ~ / :~ ./ ~x~ / ~v' . / :.' ../ 2a~ . / , ./ ~ ':, /' X ' +, . BUiLDiNG TO RE,AiN// X ~ ~ ~- ~EE .UNK ON SIDE OF PR~UN6 WIND. / / / // ~// ~ ' ~ T-~ IRON ~E OR A~ WOODEN / ~ / / / ,~, BU~LD~NO TO REBA~N// ~ F~N TRUNK TO TRE W~ UP 70 LOW~ B~CH, " / ~ ?~g LO~E ~CHOR gr~E 1~" AWAY ~0~ ~E ~UNK W~ ~E RINO ~H FOR G~E P~IOD '%'/ / / ~g~,~g SlOE OF PR~UNG WIND, T-~g IRON ~E OR ' ' R~T ~ S~ B~ S~E / ~CE~ WOODEN SUB~ ~CHOR RRMLY CROWN 0~0R~ SUG~Y ~0~) TO RNISH~ PINE ~K MULCH G~E ~ ff ~RE TO PR~OUS G~E ." ~ (UIN. 3') ' ~ ,~ ro~ ~ oR c~ ~D RE~ TOP · ' F~N ?RUNK TO ~E OF BUR~. IF NON-BIO~EG~ ~v RING CR~ SOIL ~UO~ W~ x' ~ /.- W~ IS USED, REM~ TOT~Y ,-' ~ .. TOmO~U (~,, ¢) /' .,/ .,- TO,OIL ~CKRL~ ' // WlEUA~ J BAXER. JR. CRO~N OF ~OT ~ S~L B~ ~E ~/5 ~PSOIL >~// / ~ 1030 ~ST PUTNAB AVENUE (OR SLIg~Y ~0~) TO ""ISHD '/' 1/5 P~T // ~ OREENWlOH, OT U6830 6~E ~ ff ~RE TO PR~OUS 8~E <" CO~P~ SU~OIL TO -/ FOR~ PEDE~A ,/ /' FO~ DOWN OR C~ ~B RE~O~ TOP PR~ // PINE ~K MULCH NON-BIODEG~ // ./ W~ IS USU, R~O~ TOT~Y / JO,SO~L (,,,. m /o%~ DECIDUOUS TREE P~NTING DETAIL '~, . ./ . S~ NONE ' ' //' TOPSOIL ~CKR~ v ~0~ NOT DAMAGE MAIN ROOTS OR DESTROY ROOT BALL '/~ ' / 4/5 TOP.IL WHEN INSTALLING TREE STAK~ ' ~"x"x ' ~NDSCAPE P~N ..-' .' /' 2 WATER THOROUGHLY SUBSEQUENT TO INSTAL~TION. GR~C /' // PR~ S~NG PERIOD TWICE BALL DI~j[F~R -"> ~x"x:'"" ~'/Q~:* ~EVERGREEN .... ~NTING DETAIL >' ,, ~ ~ ~ ,,~,' ~ TREE, ~./' ~ ~ = ~o ~ ~E UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR HLUAR~ ~ OONZAL[Z ~ ~ ~ ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT ~S I ~0 NOT DAMA6E MAIN ROOiS OR DESiROY ROOT BALL P.O BOX 248 x A VIO~TION OF SECTION 7209 NEW SUFFOLK, NY ]]956 , WHEN INSiALLIN6 TREE STAKE x, OF THE NEW YORK STATE ",, 2. WATER THOROUGHLY SUBSEOUI~NI TO INSTAL~TION EDUCATION ~W. '~ NX. PR~SIO~ ENGIN~ NO. 0~690 3. RE~OVE TREE RING AND STAK~.AT END OF GUAR~TEE PERIOD PAPAY ENGINEERING ~ CONSTRUOTION~ lNG, 100 HILLTOP ROAD, RAMSEy, NJ 07446 --- Sprint., Sprint Spectrum L.P. Crossroads Corporote Cenler I International Blvd., Ste 800 Mohweh, New Jersey 07495 Phone: 1201) 512 4700 Fex 1201) 512-4713 ~wireless 50 HERRICKS ROAD MINEOLA, NY 11501 1516) 294-1090 PROJECT NUMBEN I S.T.G. CHECKJ~D BY J P.E.P. NO DATE 18SUE 0 02/12/01 A~PNOVAL APPROVALS PROJECT MANAGER: DATE: SPRINT REP: DATE: VERIZON REP: DATE: ~'~ITUCK NY35XC688/958285 ELIJAH'S LANE & RT SOUTHOLD, NY 25 DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 BLOCK 4, LOT 11 .,3 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND NOTES ~HEET NUMBER L-1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 13, 2001 Mr. Lawrence C. R~ Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R~ 32 Woodbury Road Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Sprint Spectrum SCTM#1000-108-4-11.3 Dear Mr. R~: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, February 12, 2001' The final public hearing, which was held at 6:10 p.m., was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, this proposed site plan, to be known as site plan for Sprint Spectrum, is to replace an existing 100' monopole with a new 110' monopole, replace all existing antennas, affix 9 additional wireless telecommunication antennas and install related equipment cabinets at the base of the pole; and WHEREAS, William J. Baxter is the owner and Sprint Spectrum is the lease holder of the property known and designated as Sprint Spectrum Antenna Site, Main Road, Mattituck, SCTM~1000-108-4-11.3; and WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of this site plan was submitted on September 22, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on January 8, 2001; and Sprint Spectrum - Pa,qe Two -2/13/01 WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals granted a variance for the monopole height on December 7, 2000; and WHEREAS, this site plan, dated July 12, 2000, was certified by the Building Inspector on January 12, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys, dated July 12, 2000, subject to a one year review from date of building permit. Enclosed please find two copies of the approved site plan; one for your records and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for your building permit. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encls. cc: Building Dept. Tax Assessors SITE PLAN Presubmission conference (Within 30 clays of written request) Complete application receiued ~ (within 4 months of presub, conference) pplication reviewed at work session hin 10 claus of receipt) Applicant advised of necessary revisions (\vithin 30 days of review)' ised submission rece red Y Coordinalion determination _ TO: lis So,rd of ^ppea s II°' ~ r~tten comments ~ithin 60 days or request) Boar~or Trustees _ lng uepartment (certification) ' Suff°'k C°unty Department or Planning _ Department of Transportation -State Department or Transportation _ County Suffolk County Dept. of ltealth t/wire Commissioners Draft Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covenants atto Restrictions ,) Landscape plan Lighting plan Curb Cut approval llealth ;iDD~ ¢)vl~J 1)~ ;lhlage plan I~[~viewcd by Engineer Approval of site p/an -".vith conditions Endorsemen[ofsileplan Certificate of Occupancy in}pection Year revipw Page 5 Planning Board Site Plan AppllcaUon Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) L imi ted Bus i ness Zoning District Public Utility Existlng Use of SIte Public utilit,v(telecommunications) and acce~nrv buildings Pub 1 i c Uti 1 i ty Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which bulldlhg will have which use. If more than one use Is proposed per building, Indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. Replace existing 100' monoDole with npw lin' mnnnnnlg; .... ,-- · ~ ........ lng antennas; affix nine (9) additional wireless telecommunication antennas; and and install related equipment cabinets at base of pole. ' . oross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage bY Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by .Board of Appeals - Case # & date NO Board of Trustees - Case # & date No NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision .Expiration DaLe Other No Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit Issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVATION 0£ CONSr£UCllON) MAY BE UNDE£rAKEN UN171 APP£OVAL OF SIrE PLAN BY PLANNING BOA£D. VIOLAI'O£S APE SUBJECI' l'O P£OSECUrlON. Page 2 '1 Planning Board Site Plan Application APPUCANPS AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NE~V YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Don Mueller One International Blvd., Mahwah, New Jersey ~n officer of the lessee In the State of~J~)bKX~,and that hel~t~ew~xofthe above properS, Director,Site Development,NEofthe Sprint Spectrum L.P. (Title) (~ve~e~ Pa~nershlp ~K~.) is employed being duly sworn, deposes and says thaVN~x~l~ at or that he Is the which Is hereby making appllcaUon; that there are no exlsUng structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown on the SEe Plan; that the UUe to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been clearly eslabllshed and Is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed In any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be Installed In strict accordance with the plans submitted. Signed / "~"~ .z / /~, /// (Pmtner or Corp~al~ I~lc~r and Title) App]icant/Owner's Agent OATHERINE HOSt(INtel Notary Public, 8tale of New,Jersey No. 2238400 My Oomrnlsalon Explree December 30, 2004 Sprint Spectrum L.P. by Don Mueller, Director, Site Development, N.E. ([;asl; i~ame, ~iceb I~ame, mld(~]e i~lb~at, ut~l.e~ NATIJHI:. OF APi'I.ICATION~ (Cher'_k nLl [;hal; al>ply. ) Appcoval o~ pla~ Exemption from pl~ o~ o[[[c[a[ map ~X (II "O~he[,,, name ~he 'ac~lvi~.) .Application for Consideration 0f a Site Plan YE~ Ho X __ I[ ~Otl arl~3V¢l:'e(! 'YE~" eompJ, el;e i;he balance of I;It[~ £orm and dat;e and eigll ~here indicated. Name of pet-eon e~;Iployed by ~he To~m o[ Sou~hold 'l'l~le or position o[ tha~ per.on Describe Ehe rela~lo.shlp bel;ween yourael[ (~he app.Llean~) provided. PROM : FAX NO. : 97~2339Gff7 Jul. 25 L:)~OB 11:41PM P3 LETI'ER OF AUTHORIZATION for ZONING and TESTING PURPOSES Municipality: Tox~aa of Southold ~~eia Baxter. Robert A. Gc~ller, Jr. and Jane P. Ooellex, the Owners of 415 ~lijah's lane, Matfituck, NY 11959 (the "Property"), do~ h~eby appoint ~rRII~IT I$1aEGTRUM L.P. ("Sprint") and it~ employees, agents and contractors, as Owner's ~gent for thc purpose of tiling and completing any application necessary, for constructing or imtalllng on the Property, such antenna& support stmcturea and related equipment as Sprint may require for its commerdal mobile radio system, oWner further agrees that Sprint and its employees, a~ents and contractor~, shall have such acce,~ to the Property as Sprint rrm)- require for evaluating environmental, radio coverage, and other eonditiom at, on or below the Property. Sprint shall he re, on,hie for MI coat~, fce~ and ex!c~mse~ incurr~t in secu~4n~ any approval, or in connection with any te~ting. Assessor's Parc, el Number: District 1000 Section 109 Block { Lot 11.3 Property Owner: Tide: Authorized Signatory Authorized Agent: SPRI~qT SPECTRUM L.P. Signed and Sworn to before me this 617.20 Appendix A State Envlr. onmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM' SEQR /urpose: The full E^F is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of wi)ether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. Ir'is also understoocJ that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many wi)o have knowledge in one particular area may not be'aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full E^F is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components:. The ful! I?AF is c~mprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides ol~jectlve data and informati(~r~ '~'bout a giveh I~i'oject'a~d'its' site. By' i~ler~tifyin~' basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impacL The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 [3Part 3 Upqn review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact,s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. I-1 B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because t~e mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* I-t C. The project may result In one or more large and important Impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ° A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Prin~a~ of e~l~O~er in Le~ncy ' ' Signature of ~s~o~Offlcer~ Ldad A,ency __ Signature o~Preparer (If different from res~nsible officer) Date 1-1-16.2 (2,'§71-- 7c 617.21 SEQR Appendix A Slale Environmenlal Qualily Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may he significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly. there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who ¢!etermine significance may have little or no formal knowled§e of tile environment or may be technically expert in envir~mmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concern~ ~ffecting the question of significance. The full £AF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the dete. nination process has'been orderly, comprehensive in nature. ,/et flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project ;~r action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. 6y identifying basi,: project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying tile range of possible impacts that may occur from a proiect or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a p~ientially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate svhether er not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisled Actions Idenliiy Ihe Portions of EAF completed for Ii,is projecl: [] Part I [] Part 2 [:]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded On this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considerinG both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is ~easonably determined !)y the lead agency that: [] A. Tile project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and. therefore, is one which ~HI have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negalive declaration will be preparcJ. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on tile environment, there will not be a sign;(icant effect for this Unlisted Action because the miti§ation measures, described in PART 3 have been required. therefore a ' CONDITION[D ]ega we declaralon will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may ha~e a significant impact on the environment, therefore a posilive declaralion will he prepared. · A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Sprint Spectrum L.P. Name of Lead AIwncy Don Mueller . .~ ~ Director, Site D~velopment, N.E. 'rype~_~l~c.a~e ol Res Io,,~'fiice, ,.,Ix'f/~l'~'.d/~\j~ency Title o Responsibh, Ol~cer * !:~'~ ~ f S,gn.,ture ol I repar~,r Jif d,lle,ent Irom ,espons,ble oH~c~ i~PART 1--PROJECT INFORMA iN ,t Prepared by Project Sponsor " NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a signifi ant effe~ on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be onsidere -as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provideam addition, information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAFwillbe dependent on information currently available andwill ot involv new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such ~dditional work is unavailable, so indicate ,::nd specif each instance. HAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipatity and County) 415 El ijahs Lane, Mattituck/gutchogue HAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Sprint Spectrum L.P. AOORESS I International Blvd. BUSINESS TELEPHONE (201) 684-4000 CITY/PO Mahwah I STATE i ZIP COOE H^ME O~ OWNER tn ~m.,~., NJ 07495 William J. Baxter, Jr. and Jane P. Goeller I BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADORESS ( ) 2266 Palmer Avenue Birch Lane CITY/PO I I -- STATE ziP C3DE New Rochelle. New York Greenwich. Cnnnecticut NY/CT OESCRIPTION OP ACTION ' - Replace existing 100' monopole with new 110' monopole; replace all existing antennas; afl nine (9) additional wireless telecommunication antennas; and install related equipment cabinets at base of pole. Please. Complete Each queslion-lndicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [~Urban I~lndustrial I~Commercial ~._esidential (suburban E]Forest E]Agriculture E]Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 1 . R4 acres.(total APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or 8rushland (Non-agricultural) I. 61 Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 2,1. 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads. buildings and other paved sudaces 0.23 0 · 24 Other (Indicate type}. 3. What is predominant soil type{s) on proiect site? gopso']l, course to a. Soil drainage: [~Well drained __ 97% of ~Jte ~]M,~<lerately well drained __ 3 % of site {~Poo~I'.' draim.d -- % ~ff site b, II any agricultural land is invo ved, how many a(:~t.s of s~.l are ¢'lassdird ~vithin soil group t through .l of the NY Land CJassJication System? N/A acres (See I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on protect site? [~Yes ;~INo -~- What is del;th to bedrock? ~' 42 ' (in feet) [~Rural (non-farm parcel) 0.06 acres project ar= PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres 1 · 60 -- acres acres acres acres '__ _ acres ~ acres ._ acres acres ._ acres acres . -- acres acres _ acres fine sand~ 2 5. Ap. proximate percentage of propos ~ro ecl site wilh slope~' ~]U.10o..G ~ o,~ []I0 1SS~ .'1 ~15% or ~re~r 6. Is prolect substantially contiguous lo, or contain a building, sile. or district, lis~ed on Ihe State or Registers of Historic Places~ ~Yes 7.-Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register o~ National Natural Landmarks? ~Yes ~No 8. What is the depth of the water table~ 23 (in leer) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~Yes 10. Oo hunting, fishing or shell [ishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ~Yes ~No 11. Ooes project site contain any species o[ plant or animal liCe that is identified as threatened or enda]gefed? ~Yes ~No According to ~ Identify each species 12. A~e Jhere any unique or unusual land forms on tl~e project site? (i.e., cliJfs, dunes, mher geological formations) ~Yes ~No Descdbe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreatio area? C]Yes I~]No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? {]]Yes [~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name oi Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name I~l/A b. Size (In acres] 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? []]Yes C}No a) If Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [~Yes []No b) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [~Yes []No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2S-AA, Sectign 303 and 304? OYes . 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical £nvironmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 []]Yes 20. Has the site ever been used for die disposal of solid or hazardous waste?. {]]Yes {~No B. Project Descriplion 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate] a. Total contiguous acrea/Ie owned or controlh:d by project sponsor ' 0.]4 acres. ( tota l eg. COlllgollll¢ b. Project. acreage to be developed: 0o06 acres initially; 0.06 acres ~ t ~Llely. c. Proiect acreage to remain undeve!oped__.~ 99 acres.(ba~ed on total garcel ~i~e) d. Length of project, in miles:_ l~I/~.. (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expans o . indicate peu eat ol .xpansion pro ~osed ~3 f. Numb tr of of J-sueet parking spaces exislinH ~ ' proposed 0 g. btaximum vehicular trips ge.crated I~.]/~°~Lh .(upon oomph.lion ol proieclJt h. I~ ~esi(lenliaJ: Number and Iype of hous nK .mils: One Family Two J:amdy Nh.llipJe Imlially ghlmaleJy i Oimens~ons (in feet) ol largcsl I)ropn~ed SlruCture 110 heighl; J. ~inear feet of frontage along a public lhorooghfare proiecl will occupy 3 w.llh: 7 le,,~th (monopole) 0 _ft.(in rear yard) 2. How much natural material (i.e ,ck, earl etcl will Im removed from mt? 65 ,~)%~/cubic yards $. Will disturbed areas be reclain~ E]Yes C]No []~N/A ,~1. I[ yes. for what intend.__ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? C]Yes ~No "- c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I~]Yes ENo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs, ground covers) will be removed Jzom s ts? Iq_01 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? EYes ~]No . 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 3 7. If multi~phased: _ months, (including demolition}. a. Total number of phases anticipated N~_(number} b. Anticipated date of COmmencement phase 1 __ month __. year. (including dsm,; lion). c. Approximate Completion date of final phase --_ month year. d. Is pbase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [~Yes ENo 8. Will blastin] occur durin8 construction? [~Yes ~No 9. Number of jobs 8enerated: durin~ construction __ 54, -- __; citer proiect is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facili es? [~Yes fi]No If yes. explain Existinq l~le to be replaced by 110' monopole 12' away. Existing antennas ~o b.e r,e. lQgated/replaced to new monoDole. 12. ~s surface liquiawaste disposal involved? E]Yes '~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal nvoved; ElYes {~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ~Yes [xpJain ~n the_ same 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? E]Yes ~]No 16. Will the project ~enerate solid waste? fi]Yes ~]No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existin8 solid waste facility be used? I~Yes c. If yes, ~ive name --' Ioca~bn d. Will any wastes nol go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary andfill;' ~Yes ~]No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides o~ pesticidesf ~J~'es ~]Yes ,~jNo 19. Will project roulinely prdduce odors (more dian 20. Will project produce operatinl: !]o se exceedint: the h,cal ambient noise 21. Will project result in an incredsc in If yes . indicate type(s} Electrical power (approx. 60 KW) [~No 22. Il water supply is from w,:ll~, indicate punllmlR cap,,~ty N/A 23. Total anlicipated watl!r usage per day N/A ~alhms/day If Yes. explain _ ~:alhms/n,,m,te. ([]No 4 25. Appr.~vals Required: City. T~vn, Village Board I~Yes [:]No City. Town. Village Planning Board (~]Yes C]No -City, Town Zoning Board I~Yes C]No City, County Health Department C3Yes Other Local Agencies []Yes [:]No Other Regional Agencies []Yes [:3No Slate Agencies []Yes []No Federal Agencies []Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Sie~.n _Variance appllca~on Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? t~Yes []No If Yes. indicate decision required: []zoning amendment I~zoning variance []special use permit C]subdivision []new/revision of master plan []resource management plan []other ~site plan 2. YVhat is the zoning classification(s)of the site? _Limited business 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zonin~ N/.A; site is presently used for telecommunications & commercial 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site.~ N/A $. What is the maximum potential development of the site il. developed as permitted by the proposed zoni' Su: minal 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use p ans2 ~lYe: 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classil'ications within a ~,4 mile radius of proposed :Limited business, residentia! and agricultural [:]No C 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adioining/surrounding land uses within a V, m le? ~]Ye~ 9. If tl~e proposed action is the sul~division of land. how many lots are proposedl a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s} for Ihe formation of~3e~,er or ~vater districts~ {:lYe5 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any Commnnity provided services (recreation. education, police. fire protect on).~ ~Yes a. Il. yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle proje'cted demandt [:]Yes []No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generalion ol, Iraffic signil,icant!y above present levels? a. If yes. is tile existing road network adequate to ha,,(lle the additional tral,l,ic? ~Yes C3~'. D. Informational Derails Attach any additional inl'ormnlion as ,,lay be needed lo cl.,ril'y yotJr proiect. I[ Ihere are or may be ac v adverse impacts associated with your propo~i I please disc'~ss such imp.,cls and Ihe ,neasures which yot~ propose ID ,..,cigate or avoid Ihem Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE ResponsilHlily nl Lead A{~ency · General Informalion (Read Careb · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: {lave my responses and determinapons bee, reasonable.~ The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. '- Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean tidal it is also necessarily sig~ificanl' Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifvin§ an impact in column 2 simpl, asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided ace to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the thresh•id o magnitude ~)~at would trigger a response in column 2 The examples are generally applicable throughout the ~tate ant I~or most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be aFpropriab for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary· Therefore. the examples are illustmt'ive an¢ have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list o( impacts and thresholds Io answer eacI' question · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance ~f each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term. short term and cumlative effects. Inslrudions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. /%fayhe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential s: :e of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any exampleprovded, check column 2.1i impactwill occur but hresbold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed t~; PART ]. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated b~/change(s) in the project to a small to'moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not poss:ble. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND . Will the p~oposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO ~YES Examples ~hat would apply to colLJmn 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot o[ length), or where the general slopes in lbo project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth lo the water table is less than 3 reel. Construction of paved parking area for 1.000 or more vehicle~. Construction on land where bedroc~ is exposed or generally wilhin ] feet o~ exisiing ground surface. Conslruction that will c~nlinue ~or more d~an 1 year or involv~ more Ihan one phase or s~aae. ~xcava~ion for minin~ purposes Ihat wo. Jd rem~ve mo~e than 1.000 tons o~ nalural male~ial (Lo., ~oc~ o~ soil) pe~ year. Conslruction or expansion o[a sanilary I.mdfill. Conslruction in a desi8naled floodway. Od~er impacts AdditiO~ Of 25'X70' to existing ~ ~uipment area; replace 100' pole with 110' Ihe silo? (i c.. cJiJJs, dunes. ~eolol:ical [ormaJion% elc.)~]NO [lYES 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigaled By Impact Project Change [] OYes []No [] OYes []NO [] OYes ON• [] []Yes []No [] Oyes []No [] OYes []No [] []Yes []No [] OYes ON• [] ~Yes ONo ~ ~Ye~ g~o IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) -- I~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream, · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated (reshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any nomprotected existing or new body of water? ~]NO E/YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the'surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity~ ~]NO ~]YES Examples thai would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use or a source or water that does not have approval to serve proposed (proiect] action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells will/greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construclion or operation causing, any contamination o( a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid e(fluent will be conveve:J off the site to (acilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacil¥. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallr)ns per day. · Proposed Action will Iii<ely cause siltation or other discbarge'into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will rerluire the stora,qe of petroleu.u or chemical products greater Ihan 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow resi(hmtial uses in' areas wilhout water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action Iota:es comm~,rcial and/or ind.strial uses which I'acHities. G. Will proposed action ,liter drainage Ilow rjr patterns, or %urface water run•if? :~]NO (xa,nples that would apply to column ' Proposed Acdon would change dood waler flows. 7 all to Potential Can In'pact Moderate Large Mitig;..ted Impact Impact ! Projec; Chan! [] [] OYes ON O O OYes ON, [] O OYes ON, O [] OYes O [] OYes ONe O [] OYes ONc O O E]Ye~ [] O []Ye.~ E]lXlo O [] C]Ye~ El, No O O OYes E]No O O OYes ONo O O ~Ye~ ONo O [] OYes ONo O O OYes [] [] 1:3Y~ [] [] OYe: ONo O [] OYe.~ O ,'-'o ·-Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existin~ drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated I'loodwav · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? []NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount oi land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of induslrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Actioo affect any threatened or endangered species? ~]NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or mo~e species listed on the New Ymk or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: _ 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species~ I~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substanlially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more Ihan 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND 'RESOURCES 10 Will d~e Proposed Action affect agricuhural hind resources~ [~NO ~YE5 [xamplCs Iha( wot~ld apply Io column ] I~n(I (includes cropl,~nd, b,~yJields, pasluu~, vimryard, o~cha[d, elc.) 8 S I to Potential Can Im :,act Bt Moderate Large Mitig~. ed By Impact Impact Project 3hang~ O O []Yes ONo O O []Yes ONo O O OYes O~o O O OYes ONo O [] []Yes [] [] OYes []No [] O OYes O~o [] O OYes O O OYes O O OYes ONo O O OYes ONo O O OYes ONo 0 · 0 OYes ONo 0 0 OYes C · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or. if located in an Agricultural District. more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of a~ricultural land management systems (e.g.. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES I1. YVill proposed action affect aesthetic resources~ ON• []YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21. Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 ° Proposed land uses. or proiect components obviously different from or in sharp contras[ to current surrounding land use p'atterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or proiect components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views I:nown to be important to the area. · Other impacts: l~ep.tacement o~' e]c'istj. Dq 100, hi. qb moD•pole ~¢J_t~h 110' hJ.g~, mort•pole IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance~ ~]NO [::]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on lite State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed Iocaled within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Invuntory · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Acl. ion affect tl~e quaHhty or quality ol exi~liHg or Ex.ln~ples that wo.ld apply Io column 2 ~NO ~YES 9 m~ 2 3 S fo" Po(ential Can Impact 8e Moderate Large Mi'ligafed By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ~]]] Yes ON• [] [] OYes ONo O [] OYes ONo [] [] OYes ON• O [] OYes •No [] [] OYes O [] OYes.. ON• ~ 0 OYes 0 ~ []Yes ~ ~ []Yes ON• 0 0 OYes ON• 0 0 OYes 0 0 OYes ON• O O OYes ON• IMPACT ON SPORTATION 14. Will there be an e~fect to existing transportation systems? I~NO []]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 * Alteration of present patterns of movement ot peopl'e and/or goods ' Proposed Action will result in maior traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. ~,¥ill proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 * Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use ct any [cfm of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an enerRy transmission or supply system to serve more titan 50 single ct two i:amdv residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ' I~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blaslin8 within 1.500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceedin§ the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. ° ProPosed Action will remove naJural barriers that would ac~ as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous subslances (i.e. oil. pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.] in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result 'in Ibc burial of "hazardous ~vastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, hil;hly reactive, radioacuve, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more 8allons o[ liqudied natural gas or other flammable liquids within 2.000 feet (d a site used lot the disposal of sohd or hazardous ~ 2 3 Small Io Potential Can Ir pact Moderate Large Mitig ,ted B! Impact Impact Projec Chart! [] ~ [~]Yes E]N [] []~ [~Yes ON [] G OYes UN ~ U Wes ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~N~ ~ ~ ~Yes 0 0 OY,~ 0 0 Ote~ ONe 0 0 OY~: ONo ~ ~ ~Yc~ ONo IMPACT ON GROWJJ~JAND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? · ~- 6~]NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city. town or village in which the proiect is located is hkely to grow by more than $%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals· · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional Community services {e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future proiect~. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment, · Other impacts: 19 Small 10 ': Potential Can lmm:ac! B Moderale Large Miiigated By Impact Impact Project Chang [] [] []]]Yes O [] []Yes [] [] OYes []No [] O OYes ON• 0 [] Oyes ON• [] 0 OYes ON• 0 0 OY~ 0~o 0 0 OYes 0 0 OY~ Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental mpacts~' J~]NO ~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 C Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibilily of Lead Agency · ?afl 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered Io be pot?dllally large, even if Ihe impacl{~ may be mitigated. · Instruclions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe {if applicable) how the impact could be miligated or rerluced to a small to moderate impact by project ~ hangers). 3. I]ase(J on the information availaGle, decide if it is reasonable to conclude d~at this impact is impmlant. To answer the question of mportance consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · /be duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, im:luding permanently lost r,'souro.s of · Whelher the impnct ca• or will be conuolled · The regional Con~i,¢lueni:e of the imp,ret · Ils potenli. H diverNence from local neuds and I:oals · WImther knf~wn (~hiecti~ms to Ihe proi.'ct r01.11L' [Conlimle ¢)~1 attaClUll(!ntsl 11 C 617.21 Appendix B R(~iew Environmental Quality Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question Il of Part the Full EAF. (To be comp!eted by Lead Agency) Visibility h Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use. enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? NO · An pverlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? No · A site or structure listed on the I1ational or State Registers of Historic Places.) NO · State Parks? No · The State Forest Preserve? NO · Hational Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges.) NO · Hational Ilatural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? No · ftational Park Service lands? NO · Rivers designated as National or State Wild. Scenic or Recreational? No Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-V~ V4-V2 V2-3 3-5 5 + [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] © [] [] [] · Any transportation co(ridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? No · A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? NO · A site. area, lake, reservoir or highway designaled as scenic) NO [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] · Municipal parlq or designated open space) No ·Counly road) · State) State Route 25 ·tocal road? E~ijah's Lane [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] 0 [] [] 2. Is the visibility of the project scasom,l? (i.e.. :;creencd by summer foliage, hul vi:;ible du,iog oil'. :r [] Yes [] Ho during which the ploj,:ct '*'ill be visible? OHo used by the puhlic during the lirnc of y*'~]r DESC~RIPTIOH O1: E VISUAL ENVIROHMEHT 4. From ¢8ch ilem chetTked in question I. check those ~t-llich generally desc the th~_ Within F_-;s~,ntially undev~_ h',ped [~__ Forested r~ ~t~bul[,an residential ~ Indusllial O Urbon ~ Rive~, La~e. ~ond L~ Cliffs. Overlooks ~ Hilly ~ Are there visually similar projects within: ''/~ mile ~-~Yes []NO ' 1 miles OYes '2 miles ~Yes [~ I~to '3 mlle~ OYes ~rlo ' Olst~nCt [rom p~ojecl site are provided Io~ assisI~nce. ~ubsU~ule olher dlsl~nces ~s appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The ~nr~u~l number o[ viewers likely to observe Ihe proposed proJed is H©TE: When user data Is unavailable or unknown, use bes! estlmote. 400 ~ 0~_00 CONTEXT 7. The situ~[ion or aclivlly In which the viewers are engaged while viewing [he proposed action is FREQUEHCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to ~nd from work ~ [] [] r~ Involved In recreational activities [~] [] [~ [] Routine travel by residents ~ ~ ~ ~ At a residence ~ ~ ~ ~ At worksite ~ ~ ~ ~ Site Plan Check List Lot, block, section from tax map Name and address of landowner on record Names and addresses of adjoining landowners Name and address of applicant (if not same as landowner) Name and address of person preparing map (plan) sealed with license seal and signature Date of plan North point Location of all rights-of-way within 500 feet of property lines Key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500 feet at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet Existing zoning, including zone lines Scale, I inch equals 20 feet Existing contours with intervals of 2 feet or less Show wetlands - Trees of 6 inches in diameter at a point 3 feet above the trunk base Location of any cultural and historical features within 500 feet of the [1 [] [l [1 [1 [] [! [] [l [1 [1 property,boundaries -- ~*,-~ ~ Existing building structures and utilities All uses of the site Paved areas including sidewalks and parking areas Outdoor lighting Outdoor signs - sketch to scale and colors ~ ~*,e~- Grading, including existing and proposed topography with 2 feet contours on site and 200 feet beyond the property line - Spot elevations for buildings Location of landscaping, buffering, street tree plans Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing proposed use of floor area Show location of ground transformers, fire well and fire hydrants Show location of dumpster - ~'"'~' Percent lot coverage Percent landscaped Data for architectural review (see attached sheet) Review required by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Review by New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) for curb cut permit Review by Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) for curb cut permit . * Review by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Review by Southold Town Trustees (freshwater wetlands). Flag and shew wetlands on plan Review required by Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Review required (permit) by Southold Town Board Other Date: 09/22/00 Transaction(s): Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southotd, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Receipt~: 5007 Subtotal $155.00 1 Apphcat~on Fees 1 Apptication I ~s Total Paid: $155.00 Check#: 5007 SEP 2lEO ~ Town Planning Board Name: Clerk ID: Sprint, Spectrum L. P. 4900 Main St Kansas City, MO 64112 LINDAC Internal iD: 18201 PAPAY ENGINEERING ~ CONSTRUCTION, INC. I00 Hilltop Road Phone (201) 934~2828 Ramsey, New Jersey 07446 F~x (201) 934 I lgl LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To FEB 1 Date Job NO. 2/14/01 ] 1239 MR. ROBERT KASSNER, #1179 MA~I-ITUCK SITE SPRINT SITE #NY33XC688 SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL 53095 STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 Phone (631) 765-1938 We are sending you [] Attached E~ Shop Drawings [] Prints [] ~ Fed. Exp. Std the following items: [] Ptans [] Samples [] Specifications [] Copy of letter [] Change order [] Signed and Sealed Copies Date Number Description 5 2/12/01 L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: [] For approval [] For your use [] As requested [] For review and comment [] FOR BIDS DUE [] Approved as submitted [] Resubmit [] Approved as noted [] Submit [] Returned for corrections [] Return [] Other [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US copies for approval copies for distribution corrected pdnts REMARKS COPY TO File @ PE&C ESTEBAN FLORES @ SPRINT W/(1 ) SET Signed 1 0 0 ® l/SA Airbill Express From ~hiFo..,ijn/~an_bo,jmomi ~ R,cipi,,~, mnrds Date Fed~ lrackin~ Number Br~an Taylor Sende6s Name Phone ~01 ~ J~4--'~8 ~apy?~PA'Y ENOINEERING & CDNS"T Address tOO HIt.LrOP RD C~~j~E'¢ State Nd ZIP 07446 ~ur I~mal Billing ~emnce 1230 To Robert Kassner, %1179 631 765-1938 RecJpienfs Name Phone 4a Express Package Service ~,.... ~'25824646,~,0, 2 I FedEx Prlo.w Over nl~lml ~ r~!dEx St i,lcla,r i! O, .r nl!pl Company Address Soutbold Tcwn Hall 53095 State Road 25 Southold ]NY 11971 City ~ ZIP 4b Express Freight Service 5 Packaging 6 Special Handling L Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOW~T OF SOUTHOLD Fax (631) 765-1823 Telephone (631) 765-1802 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Building Department January 12, 2001 JAN 1 2 2 Ol BUILDING DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN CERTIFICATION Project Sprint Spectrum Location Main Road & Eliiahs Lane .Mattituck SCTM# 1000-Section 108 -Block 4 -Lot 11.3 Date of Last Revision 7/12/00 1. THE PROPOSED USE Monopole AND ACCESSORY USE AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN IS / ARE PERMITTED IN THIS LEI DISTRICT pursuant to conditions ZBA #-4862. 2. PROPOSED AND EXISTING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 100 OF SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 3. ALL STRUCTURES COMPLY WITH SETBACKS AS CONTAINED IN BULK SCHEDULES OR ELSEWHERE IN CHAPTER 100. Authoriz~nature PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public headng will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 12th day of February, 2001 on the question of the following: 6:00 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed minor subdivision of North Bayview Associates. The property is located on the south side of North Bayview Road, approximately 150' east of Seawood Ddve in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-79-8-12. 6:05 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Stephen Pawlik. The property is located on Sound Avenue, 500' east of Lipco Road in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-141-3-40. 6:10 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Sprint Spectrum; The property is located at Elijah's Lane, 400' north of Route 25 in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-108-4-11.3. 6:15 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for the Gulf Service Station. The property is located at the intersection of Route 25 and Main Bayview Road in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-70-7-4. Dated: 1/10/01 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Oriowski, Jr. Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2001 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU. COPIES SENT TO: Suffolk Times Traveler Watchman LEGAL NOTICE NOTICa OFI'UPa~IC ~A~G NOTICE IS ~REBY GIV~ that, ~ held by~e Sou~old Town Southold. New York in s~d Town o~ the t~on of the following: posed mi~r subdivision :of No~h of Se~ Dfivein S0~tho d ~o~n of $outhold. County of Suffolk, S~b~ of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numb~r]~-79-8- i2. 500' east of Lipco Road in Mattltack. Yown of Sou~old. County of Suffolk. Map Number ~-141-3-~. Town of Southold. County 6f Suffolk. State of New York. Suffo~ County Fax 6:15 ~.m. ~blic He~flg'for the~ro- STATE OF NEW YORK) )SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ~[~ ~('- of Mattituck, in said county, bein~g duly swom, says that he/she is Principal clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, pub- lished at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly pub- lished in said Newspaper once each week for } weeks successively, commencing the ~, _day on Nctar~ Public, Stale of How York No. 01WE6034554 Ovalified in ~ u ~o,~ County Cc;,, ;~on Expiles D~cembet 13,~ Sworn to before me this day of .~-O,~, 20 o[ PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 9,2001 Mr. Lawrence C. Rd Munley, Meade, Nielsen 32 Woodbury Road Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Sprint Spectrum SCTM#1000-108~4-11.3 Dear Mr. The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 8, 2001: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, February 12, 2001 at 6:10 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated July 12, 2000. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Headng, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Office, Southold Town Hall. Please return the endorsed Affidavit of Posting and the signed green return receipts from the certified mailings on the day of, or at the public hearing. The sign and the post will also need to be returned at your earliest convenience after the public hearing. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. /"~ry truly yours'- ~ /~ / / ~ennett Orlowsk~' Jr. ~ Chairman Encls. PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hail, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant January8,2001 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Sprint Spectrum SCTM#: 1000-108-4-11.3 Location: Route 25 & Elijah's Lane, Mattituck SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This proposed site plan is to replace an existing 100' monopole with a new 110' monopole, replace all existing antennas, affix 9 additional wireless telecommunication antennas and install related equipment cabinets at the base of the pole. SEQR Negative Declaration - Pa.qe Two Reasons Supporting This Determination: This project involves the construction of a 110' monopole, nine antennas & related telecommunications equipment. A variance has been granted by the Board of Appeals for this 110' high telecommunications monopole in this Limited Business (LB) Zone, thus the proposed action is consistent with zoning. An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. There has not been any correspondence received from the Department of Health Service in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required relevant permits. For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (631)765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Dept. of Health NYS DEC, Stony Brook Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Southold Town Building Dept. Applicant § 58-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1 Chapter 58 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1. Providing notice of public hearings. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 12-27-1995 as L.L. No. 25-1995. Amendments noted where appHcable.] § 58-1. Providing notice of public hearings. Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing, this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon. The board or commission reviewing an application shall provide for the giving of notice: A. By causing a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. By requiring the applicant to erect the sign provided by the town, which shall bo prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application abuts, giving notice of the application, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall bo set back not moro than ten (10) feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven (7) days immediately prec~]i-~ the date of the public hearing. The applicant or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision. C. By requiring the applicant to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or p~vate street 5801 ~ -~-~ §58 1 SOUTHOLD (;ODE § 58-1 from the property included in the application. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipl requested, posted at least seven (7) days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roil. The applicant or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision. 5802 Southold Town Plannin,q Board Notice to Adiacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-108-4-11.3; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the L-B (Limited Business) Zoning District. That the application is to replace an existing 100' monopole with a new 110' monopole; replace all existing antennas, affix 9 additional wireless telecommunication antennas, and install related equipment cabinets at base of pole. The property is located at Elijah's Lane & Route 25 in Mattituck; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765- 1938. 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, February 121 2001 at 6:10 p.m. in the Meetin,q Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): Sprint Spectrum Date: 1/9/01 MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN 8; RI~ 160 MIDDLE NECK ROAD GREAT NECK, NEW YORK 11021 (516) 487-6500 (516) 487-6539 REPLY TOi / 32 WOODBURY ROAD HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 (631) 425-4100 TELECOPIER (631) 425~4104 February l5,2001 VIA UPS Ms. Carol Kalin Planning Board Office Town of Southold 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 1197l RE: Sprint Spectrum L.P. Application for Site Plan Premises: 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck, New York Dear Ms. Katin: With respect to the captioned application, we enclose the following: 2. 3. 4. 5. 5. Affidavit of Mailings with attached list of property owners; Nine (9) U.S. Postal Certified Mail Receipts, dated February 2, 200l; Legal Notice; Compound Plan; Certified Mail returned green cards and envelopes; and Affidavit of Posting. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & Rt~ By: Lawrence C. R6 LCR:jm Enclosures FEB $ PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. CTM Parcel #1000-108-4-11.3 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILINGS STATE OF NEW YORK ) )SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) I, DOROTHY BELARD, residing at Greenlawn, New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 2nd day of February, 2001, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in Huntington, New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a tree copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to current owners shown of the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the (X) Assessors, or ( ) County Real Property Office _, for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. SEE LIST OF NAMES, ADDRESSES AND LOT NUMBERS ANNEXED HERETO Sworn to before me this 2p~d Day of February, 3001 NOTARY PUBLIC EVAMARIE WILSON DOROTHY BE-I~d) Southold Town Plannin.q Board .,Notice to Adjacent Property Ownem You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-108-4-11.3; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the L-B (Limited Business) Zoning District. 4. That the application is to replace an existing 100' monopole with a new 110' monopole; replace all existing antennas, affix 9 additional wireless telecommunication antennas, and install related equipment cabinets at base of pole. The property is located at Elijah's Lane & Route 25 in Mattituck; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765- 1938. 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, .February 12, 2001 at 6:10 p.m. in the MeetinR Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): Sprint Spectrum Date: 1/9/01 100 Hg_UOP ROAD P, NgS[Y. NJ 0744§ (201) 954-2828 r~x (200 954-1181 SpKnt Sprint Spectrum 1~ W~SHIN(~TON VALLEY EON) BEDI~INSIER. NJ 07921 (9~8} ~06-4046 W0 W1239 ,- MATTITUCK- 33-688 SHEET No. SK- 1 Or 1 CALCULATED aY. J.D.P. DATE 10/03/00 CHECKED ~ PEP. DATE 10/03/00 SCALE AS SHOWN SITE ADDRESS: ELIJAH'S LANE & ROUTE 25, SOUTHOLD, NY LOT: 11.3, BLOCK: 4, SECTION: 108, DISIRICT: 1000 2O COMPOUND PLAN SCALE: 1":20' GRAPHIC SCALE 0 IO 20 40 ( IN FEET ) I inch = 20 fL SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. Premises: 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck County Tax Map No. 1000-108-4-11.3 Name & Address Thomas C. & Catherine M. Wilton 260 Elijah's Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Barbara Hofer & Charles Gaetjens P.O. Box 481 Mattituck, NY 11952 Terence E. Matthews RR 1 Box 105C Mattituck, NY 11952 Sonia C. Hunter 55 Sundance Drive Cos Cod, CT 06807-1809 Raymond & Sally Neighley 27 Case Avenue Patchogue, NY 11772 Janet Oddon 315 Rachels Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Joan Patricia Hilliard & Ubaldo Gonzalez PO Box 248 New Suffolk, NY 11956 William J. Baxter Jr. et al. 1030 East Putnam Avenue Greenwich, CT 06830 Dorothy Counelly & Karen Maston c/o Roasalie Maston 535 Elijah's Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Tax Map No. 1000-108-3-5.6 1000-108-3-5.7. 1000-108-3-5.8 1000-108-4-7.3 1000-108-4-7.43 1000-108-4-7.44 1000-108-4-8 1000-108-4-11.2 1000-108-4-12 PLANN1NG BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. Regarding Posting of Sign upon the Premises: 415 Elijah's Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 1000-108-4-11.3 AFFIDAVIT OF SIGN POSTING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, JANINE MARCHESE, residing at 43 Calvert Avenue, Commack, New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 5th day of February, 2001, I personally placed the Towffs official Poster, with date of hearing and nature of my application noted thereon, securely upon the premises captioned above, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-way (driveway entrance) - facing the street or facing each street or right-of way entrance; and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the subject hearing date, which hearing date was shown to be February 12, 2001. Sworn to before me this 5~day of February, 20 NOTARY PUBLIC u JANINE MARCHESE · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return 'ih~sar~i"o you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailp~ece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addmss~ to: Terence E. Matthews RR I Box 105C Mattituck,NY 11952 2. Article Number Copy ~m se~ice ~be8 7000 1670 0006 9256 0928 PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Returl UUd~UU bonza lez ]' D.aro.thy..£am~e] 1.~. &..Kar. en Ma: s,~..~. *fl/~6' ~R~s~l~f e M a s t o n William J. Bax%e~ J~., et.al Street Apt NO, or PO Box No 1020 East, Putnam A~enue CIt~ State ZIPs4 6T 0683O Thomas C.&C~J;heri ne ~ .~;i..~7~;2~..Elijah'$ Lane lq~%ituck, NY 11952 · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Barbara Hofer & Charles Gaetjens P.O. Box 481 Mattituck,NY 11952 C. Sign u~'e' /' ' ~ rl Agent ~ [] Addressee "' ~ delivery addresscdl~ent from item 1 ? [] Yes S ~[~. I ~l~ified ~lail [] Express Mail ~.~'~L.._.D F~eCgiste~l [] Return Receipt for Memhandise '~~ ~ C.O.D. =-- '~l~stricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number (Copy from service label) 7000 1670 0006 9256 0935 PS Form 381 1, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952 · -' ,~'~;i,;;;-fvlai, [] Express Mail [] Registered [] Return Receipt for Memhandise _ [] Insured Mai~ [] C.O.D~ -- ~4, Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 2. Article Number (Copy from service labe/) ~ PS Form 381 1, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt Janet 0ddon I v 315 Rachels Road I Mattituck, NY 11952 102595-00-M-0952 3. Service Type [~] Certified Mail [] Registered [] Insured Mail !xpress Mail eturn Receipt for Merchandise [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 2. Adicle Number (CORy from service label) 7000 1670 0006 9256 0898 PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt ~0259500 M-0952 Thomas C. & Catherine M.Wilto 260 Elijah's Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 3. ~rvice Type Certified Mail [] Express Mail Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandise [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes ........... ~']I ........ 1'-"' 2. Article Number (CORy from service label) Janet, 0ddon · , 7000 1670 0006 9256 0942 ~.~:~pt3~} 5~,' ~li~l'~- R~Ai] PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 10259~-00-M-0952 I~\ I YES, enter delivery address below: [] No L b,~'~F~£,. "~F;:~ ................ I~attituck, NY 11952 William J. Baxter ,Jr., et, al. Irrl 1030 East Putnam Avenue -'' Greenwich, CT 06830 Ra~mond & Sally Neighle~( 3 Service Type 27 Case Avenue ' ~t~t~'~lF;;{ ................. ~Certified Mail [] Express Mail "~ ] .......... [] Insured iVl~i! [] C.O:D. Patcho-ue NY 11772 [] Registered [] Return RecelptforMerchandlse Soni a C. Hunter 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes Y'~"[:~'~'~'~.'"~'~'i~'~ ' 2. ArticleNumber(Copyfromservicelabe,) -a;~-~7~'~,~s--C-ob; '¢T-06807~1809 7000 1670 0006 9256 0881 PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952 MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RE ATTORNEYS AT LAW FORW OmG TIME EXPIRED RETUR,q ~PT 7000 1670 0006 9256 0904 Raymond & Sa' Neighley 27 MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & R~ ATTORNEYS AT LAW ~ ~ECE~T REQUESTED 7000 1670 0006 9256 0874 iiiiiiiii i i ii Illllllll I I II III IIII I II Iltl II Dorothy Connelly & Karen Maston c/o Rosalie Maston 535 Elijah's Lane I'~ ...... ~'~ 11952 i I iii AFFIDAVIT OF POSTINO This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notices(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail, the receipts of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the above mentioned property on Your name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE £E TUI~N THIS AFFIDAVIT AND CE, eT/F/ED MAIL £E CEIP TS ON THE DAY OF. Ole AT THE PUBLIC HEAtelNG Re: Site Plan for Sprint Spectrum SCTM#: 1000-108-4-11.3 Date of Hearing: 2~2/01, 6:10 p.m. SPRINT SPECTRUM SPRINT SPECTRUM 1000-108-4-11.3 Replace an existing 100' monopole with a new 110' monopole, replace all existing antennas, affix 9 additional wireless telecommunication antennas and install related equipment cabinets at base of pole. MON. - FEB. 12, 2001 - 6:10 P.M. ' ~AI~.PEAD$ BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Homing BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall ~'K~x 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF DECEMBER 7, 2000 Appl. No. 4862-SPRINT SPECTRIUM, L.P. 1000-108-4-11.3 · STREET & LOCATION: 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: November 16, 2000 FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is located on the west side of Elijah's Lane, Mattituck. The property contains approximately 95,000 sq. ft. with 197.50 ft. frontage along the west side of Elijah's Lane, Mattituck. The property is improved with a one-story warehouse building and rear yard structures as shown on the Map dated August 13, 199, prepared by Carman-Dunne, P.O. The property is zoned Light-Business (LB). BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Inspector's May 31, 2000 Notice of Disapproval for the reason that applicant's proposed wireless telecommunication tower exceeds the height limited under Section 100- 162B.3 within 300 feet, at a total height of 110 feet (overall). RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant is requesting a height 10 ft. greater than its existing tower and which has an overall height 20 feet greater than other structures within 300 feet. The existing telecommunications tower is 100 ft. tall. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: Based on the testimony and record before the Board and personal inspection, the Board makes the following findings: (1) The proposed monopole tower will replace the existing tower and will add co-location facilities, which is encouraged by the Southold Town Code. Co-location of telecommunication antennas are needed and will enhance efficiency with expanded coverage. Alternate sites for the tower, to obviate the need for a variance, is not available on this property without a variance. (2) No evidence has been submitted to show that the additional 10 ft. will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. (3) There is no evidence that grant of the requested variance will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions. (4) Grant of the requested vadance is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable applicant to co-locate with others for communications purposes, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. (5) The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of properties in adjacent Zone Districts. The property contains a 100 ft. tall wireless telecommunications tower, and the new tower is a Page' 2 - D~cember 7, 2000 App,. Nc~ 4~62:1000-108-4-11.3 Southold Town Board of Appeals replacement, with an additional 10 feet in height. (6) The variance requested is not substantial. RESOLUTION/ACTiON: On motion by Member Tortora, seconded by Member Collins, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the application, as applied for, subject to the following CONDITIONS: 1. That a fully operational light be placed at the top, and continuously used and maintained (for aircraft visibility purposes (to and from the Mattituck Air Base); 2. That only one monopole structure or tower may exist on the property. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: MEMBERS GQE~ER, TO~,_T..~RA,~LLINS, and HORNING. This Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). .. GERARD P. GOEHRIN(~ER ' /" CHAIRMAN 12/z~'/00 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairraan WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 19, 2000 Mr. Lawrence C. R~ Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R~ 32 Woodbury Road Huntington, NY 11743 Re; Proposed Site Plan for Sprint Spectrum SCTM#1000-108-4-11.3 Dear Mr. R~: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 18, 2000: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHANI, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: ~_,~/~,j Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ~ Unlisted Contact Person: ~5-1~3~ ' (631) 7 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (/~ This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. · rely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. v Chairman cc: Board of Appeals Building Department Southold Town Board ~13fl'bT~C~aflt~D~p~,-ns~ cf, ",~,~,,, ....., ,3el vice~ NYSDEC - Stony Brook u o ,;c Wc~A'S'- · . ' eer-~---- or a en 0 ', teen ' , 'ge minis r Suffolk County Water Authority *Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHA~, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer,,~ Sprint Spectrum Main Road, Mattimck SCTM# I000-108-4-11.3 December 11, 2000 Please review the attached for certification. PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State RouteX2~5 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-3136 Telephone (631) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 27, 2000 John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 OCT 1 6 2001 Southold Town Planning Board Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find a copy of the site plan, dated 7/12/00, for the Sprint Spectrum LP. Project. SCTIV~1000-108-4-11.3 The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fire- wells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. O The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recommendation at to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this project. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Robert G. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer enc. LLc:~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHA3/I, JR RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-3136 Telephone (631) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 27, 2000 John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find a copy of the site plan, dated 7/12/00, for the Sprint Spectrum L.P. Project. SCTM#1000-108-4-11.3 The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fire- wells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recommendation at to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this project. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Site Plan Reviewer enc. MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & R~ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 32 WOODBURY ROAD (631) 425-4100 (631) 425-4104 August 31,2000 BY HAND Mr. Robert Kassner Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Sprint Spectrum L.P. Application for Consideration of a Site Plan Premises: 415 Elijahs Lane Mattituck, New York Dear Mr. Kassner: AUG 3 1 21 uu Our firm represents Sprint Spectrum L.P. ('Sprint') in connection with the captioned application for consideration of a site plan. In furtherance of the foregoing, we enclose the following: 1. Application for Consideration of a Site Plan; 2. A check made payable to "Town of Southold" in the sum of $155.00 for filing fee; 3. Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form; 4. Letter of Authorization for Zoning and Testing Proposes; 5. Full Environmental Assessment Form; and 6. Nine (9) Site Plans, including Site Plan Check List. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RI~ By: Lawrence C. R6 LCR:jm Enclosures I'LA~NING BOARD MEMBERS RICtlARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS pLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Ma~r~ Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-31:,6 Telephone (516) 765 L938 Date Received Date Completed Filing Fee APPUCATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PlAN X New Change o1' Use Re-use Extension Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: Location: Address: Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: Telephone: Owner of Land: Agent or Person responsible for application: Address: Telephone: Site plans prepared by: License No.: Address: lelephone: 415 Elijahs Lane 415 Elijahs Lane Mattituck/Cutchogue Sprint Spectrum L.P. i International Blvd., Mahwah, New Jersey 07495 201-684-4000 William J. Baxter and Jane P. Goeller Attorney for Applicant) Lawrence C. Re' Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re' 32 Woodbury Road~ Huntington, NY 11740 631-425-4100 Papay Engineering & Construction, Inc. Peter E. Papay, P.E. 0§4690 100 Hilltop Road. Ramsey, N~w ,l~r~y .201-512-4700 07446