HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-108.-4-11.3 (5)VISUAL IMPACT, PLANNING AND ZONING ANALYSIS
PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY
SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
415 ELIJAH'S LANE
HAMLET OF MATTITUCK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK
Prepared for:
Sprint Spectrum L.P.
Crossroads Corporate Center
1 International Boulevard - Suite 800
Mahwah, New Jersey 07495
Attention: Mr. Jeffrey Kitt
Prepared by:
Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc.
368 Veterans Memorial Highway
Commack, New York 11725
(631) 499-2222
November 2000
Table of Contents
Page
1
Introduction ..............................................
Existing Visual Resources ..................................... 2
Land Use, Zoning and Environmental Analysis ................... 10
Visual Impact Analysis ...................................... 13
Findings and Conclusions .................................... 22
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Site Location Map ............................... 5
Site Plan ....................................... 6
Compound Plan, Elevations and Detail ............... 7
Sprint Search Area ............................... 8
Photograph Location Map ........................ 16
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Photographs of Site and Surrounding Area
Creative Visuals, Inc. Letter Report, View Point Photographs and
Photographic Simulations
Cumculum Vitae of Theresa Elkowitz, Principal of Freudenthal &
Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc.
INTRODUCTION
A visual impact, planning and zoning analysis was performed for the proposed public utility
communications facility of Sprint Spectrum, L.P. The subject site is a commemiat property located
at 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County. The applicant, Sprint Spectrum,
L.P., is proposing to replace an existing 100± foot high monopole with a 110-~ foot high monopole,
place its antennas at 110-k feet, and to install equipment on concrete piers. The existing 100+ foot
monopole currently acconunodates the communications antennas of three carders. In addition to
Sprint, and although not part of this application, Verizon Wireless is proposing to co-locate its
antennas on the 11 (B= foot replacement monopole at a height of 80+ feet and to locate its equipment
in a proposed expanded lease area. Overall, five communications carriers would ultimately co-locate
on the replacement monopole and have their associated equipment in the expanded communications
compound.
A site and area inspection as well as a review of aerial photography were undertaken to examine land
use on the site and in the surrounding community. In addition, Town of Southold zoning maps were
consulted to determine the zoning of the site and surrounding area.
In order to conduct the visual analysis, the following methodology was employed:
Visual inspection of the proposed public utility communications facility location and
evaluation of physical characteristics of the existing and proposed facilities;
Visual inspection of proximate areas to determine existing characteristics of and
obstructions in the horizon; and
Photographic simulation analysis of the proposed public utility communications
facility from several identified vantage points, conducted by Creative Visuals, Inc.
Specific methodology used in the preparation of visual simulations performed by Creative Visuals,
Inc. is included in Appendix B.
EXISTING VISUAL RESOURCES
Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility
The project site is situated at 415 Elij ah's Lane, Town of Southold, Suffolk County (see Figure
Site Location Map). The property is designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000
Section 108- Block 4- Lot 11.3.
The subject property currently contains a public utility communications facility on the premises of
a warehouse occupied by North Fork Galleries, Ltd. The overall property, including the warehouse
facility, the communications compound and a dirt driveway/parking area, is approximately 1.8±
acres in size.
The existing communications compound area is situated on the western portion of the property to
the rear of a warehouse facility and contains rock/gravel, weedy vegetation and asphalt as well as
the existing monopole and associated equipment (see Figure 2 - Site Plan). The existing
communications compound contains equipment of Nextel Communications, Inc., AT&T Wireless
and Ornnipoint Communications, Inc. The communications antennas associated with the three
existing carriers are proposed to be relocated onto the proposed 110± foot high replacement
monopole.
2
The existing commtmications compound is proposed to be expanded to approximately 5,700~ square
feet in size to accommodate the two proposed additional carriers (i.e., Sprint Spectrum, L.P. and
Verizon Wireless). The replacement monopole will be approximately 10 feet higher than that which
currently exists and will be constructed to the northwest of the existing pole. Upon construction of
the new monopole, the existing pole will be dismantled and removed from the site. The proposed
expansion of the equipment area will take place along the northernmost portion of the existing
compound. The existing seven foot high chain-link fencing along the northern perimeter will be
removed and new matching fencing will be placed around the expanded compound.
The proposed Sprint antennas will be located at a height of 110~ feet above grade level (agl) at the
top of the replacement pole. The Sprint equipment cabinets will be placed on concrete piers adjacent
to the northernmost portion of the existing compound within the proposed expanded lease area.
Verizon Wireless is proposing to locate the top of its antennas at a height of 80-k feet agl. The
Verizon equipment shelter will be approximately 12 feet by 30 feet in size and will also be situated
adjacent to the northernmost portion of the existing compound in the proposed expanded lease area
(see Figure 3 - Compound Plan, Elevation and Details).
As previously stated, the three existing communications carriers will relocate their antennas onto the
proposed 110-& foot high replacement monopole. AT&T Wireless is proposing to relocate its
triangular array of antennas at a height of 1004- feet agl. Nextel Communications, Inc. will relocate
its triangular array at a height of 904- feet agl. Omnipoint Communications, Inc. is proposing to
relocate its antennas at a height of 654- feet agl. The equipment associated with the three existing
carriers will remain in their current locations.
3
The proposed public utility communications facility site is located within an area in which Sprint
Spectrum L.P. is experiencing a service deficiency gap (see Figure 4 - Sprint Search Area). The
search area is that area in which the communications facility must be located to address the service
deficiency. As indicated in Figure 4, State Route (S.R.) 25 traverses the search area in an east-west
direction. The northern boundary of the search area extends approximately one-half mile to the north
of S.R. 25. The southernmost search area boundary extends generally fi.om New Suffolk Road along
the westernmost perimeter and continues in a northeasterly direction. The easternmost search area
boundary begins near Moores Lane/Linden Avenue (on the south) and continues in a northerly
direction across S.R. 25 (to the east of Alvahs Lane). The westernmost search area boundary begins
at a point to the west of Meadow Lane and continues in a northerly direction over S.R. 25 and
continues northwesterly along Farmer Road.
The search area contains commemial properties and farmland (along S.R. 25), with residential
properties to the north and south.
4
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
MATTITUCK AND MATTITUCK HILLS QUADRANGLES
3
4-0 Datum.' WGS84
Site Location Map 5 FIGURE 1
t
)9/
~/~SITE PLAN
6
Sprint SpecUlum
P.E.P.
i~IA1TII"UCK
NY33XC688/958283
ELIJAH'S L,~E & ET
SOUTHOU3,
OIST. 1000, SEC. 108
BLOCK ¢, LOT 11..3
SITE PLAN AND NOTES
S-t
' ~"- "' '" ~ ~"~ / /~
· . ,, .- , ~ . ~ ~ ..,/ ~ ~ >:. .
~' ~/~ .,,.... ~ ..... ~.,,,.~,.~
~'~~VK ~ '~ - x.~4, ,.:: :. ~ / //: , ...,.,.:.
~~/ ',~' ~11,~ m k ' ~ I ii i v I 9' ~ :
E~ATiON~ X-~ ~ x x m ~ ~ ~ ~~e~
-/. ,:;:55/ ~,~ ,,, ', ..>: ,,~ ~. 1.¢.~ ~,~,,,,~..,,,~,,o~
~ ~'~ "~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"' ~' ~ SURFACE
~} // ~ MA~ITUCK
~ ~ ~ ~.r~. ~ ~ NY33XC688/958285
~ _ -~ ~ ELIJ~'S ~[ · R~ 25
-~,~~ ~ ~1111~~~ -, .~ - -..__ .: , -
: ~~ ~ .~ , DIST. 1000, SEC. 108
~ .~-~ m II ~ II ~~ ~ ~ giB: FRON,~AVEGUIDE ENTRY D:AIL
~ UNDERGROUND UTIU~ TRENCH DDAIL NEXTEL ANTENNA ELWATION
~-. '~ ~ ~ ~ COMPOUND P~N,
~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ {'~ ~) ~: '~"~'~ EL~ATION AND D~LS
~~2~FENCE ~ GATE D~A1L , ~,~,'~=.[~*,~,,~.~ , .~s,~s,o,*,~:~,~.
Mattimck Site
SPRINT SEARCH AREA --
4orth Fork
Site
25
NEW SUFFOLK
Visual Environment of the Site and Surrounding Area
A visual inspection of the subject property indicates that the existing lease area that is proposed to
be expanded is located adjacent to the western portion (to the rear) of a warehouse facility and
contains a monopole, antennas and equipment of three public utility communications providers. The
overall property contains the warehouse, the communications compound, a dirt driveway/parking
area and fencing. The remainder of the property contains trees, lawn and some landscaping.
The project site is situated on a commemial property that is accessible from a dirt driveway entrance
on the west side of Elijah's Lane. The southernmost portion of Elijah's Lane begins at S.R. 25 and
continues in a northwesterly direction to Oregon Road (County Road 84). To the north of the subject
site is a small wooded area and residential properties on Elijah's Lane followed by Rachel's Road,
which contains a residential subdivision. Immediately to the south of the project site is a commercial
facility that contains Lindsay' s All Pro Auto Parts, followed by S.R. 25 and farmland associated with
a winery. The east side of Elijah's Lane contains residential properties followed by a commercial
property that contains a Christmas tree farm and a nursery. To the west of the subject site is wooded
area followed by residential properties and farmland.
The community surrounding the subject property contains commercial and farm uses along S.R. 25
with residential uses and farmland located within the interior roadways to the north and south of
same. In order to depict the nature of the surrounding community, photographs are included in
Appendix A. A detailed description of the land use surrounding the subject site is contained in the
section entitled Land Use. Zoning and Environmental Analysis, below.
The visual environment in the surrounding community has been impacted. It currently contains
overhead utility poles and associated wiring that run along ali of the surrounding roadways as well
as the existing 100+ foot monopole. The Christmas tree farm located on the east side of Elijah's
Lane (to the rear of the residences) also contains a radio antenna tower.
9
LAND USE, ZONING AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Zoning and Land Use of the Site and Surrounding Area
According to the Town Southold zoning map (dated November 12, 1996), the subject property is
situated within the Limited Business (LB) district. According to the Town of Southold Zoning
Ordinance, this district permits one-family detached dwellings, agricultural uses and Town buildings
and structures (as defined in Section 100-3lA of the Agricultural Conservation District). Also
permitted are retail businesses that are complementary to the rural and historic character of the
surrounding area. This includes antique shops, art and craft shops, galleries, custom workshops,
machine shops, wholesale or retail garden facilities and nurseries, libraries, museums, offices,
restaurants, funeral homes, personal service shops, repair shops and wineries. The subject site is
developed with a warehouse facility with associated parking areas and an existing public utility
communications facility. The land uses in the area appear to conform with the designated zoning
districts. The zoning and land uses of the surrounding area are as follows:
North:
The area located to the north of the subject site is situated within the Residential Low
Density AA (R-40) zoning district and contains a residential subdivision (Rachel's
Road and Tabor Road) as well as residences that are situated on Elijah's Lane. To
the north of the residential subdivision is the Long Island Railroad track.
South:
To the immediate south of the subject site is a commercial property within the
Limited Business (LB) district (as is the subject site). That property is situated at the
comer of S.R. 25 and Elijah's Lane and is occupied by Lindsay's All Pro Auto Parts.
The area to the south of S.R. 25 contains farmland occupied by Osprey Dominion
Vineyards (zoned Agricultural-Conservation District - A-C). The area to the
southwest of S.R. 25 contains a residential subdivision that is zoned under the
Residential Low Density AA (R-40) district. Moving further south, residential uses
resume along the south side of New Suffolk Avenue.
I0
East:
The east side of Elijah's Lane contains residential properties that are zoned
Residential Low Density AA (R-40). Beyond the residential properties, land uses
consist of a Christmas tree farm and nursery that are situated within the Agricultural
Conservation (A-C) zoning district. The properties situated along the north side of
S.R. 25 are zoned Residential Low Density A (R-80) district.
West:
To the west of the subject site is a small portion of the residential subdivision
(previously discussed under "north") as well as properties that are situated on the
north side of S.R. 25, which are mainly residential in nature. The above residential
areas are designated Residential Low Density AA (R-40). Farmland is located to the
west of the residential area under the Agricultural Conservation (A-C) zoning district.
11
Environmental Considerations
Since the expanded communications facility will remain unmanned, there will be minimal impact
on the environmental conditions in the area. The facility will not generate either sewage or solid
waste and will not need to be supplied with potable water. The traffic generated by the proposed
project is also minimal, consisting of one to two trips per month (per career) to monitor the
equipment. The equipment installed on the site will use a minimal amount of electricity.
There will be no adverse impact on soils or topography, nor will the proposed project affect
drainage. Since there will be no sewage generation or water use, there will be no impact to surface
water nor to groundwater quantity or quality. As the proposed location of the communications
facility is on a developed commercial property and only minimal cleating will be necessary, there
will be no significant adverse impact to the ecology of the area.
The subject property is not situated within the Central Pine Barrens and is not located within a
Special Groundwater Protection Area.
12
VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Photographic Simulation Methodology
To determine the visual impact of the proposed 110± foot replacement monopole, installation of
Sprint and Verizon antennas and relocation of the antennas of three careers that currently exist on
the 100-~ foot monopole, Creative Visuals Inc., prepared photorealistic renderings of the proposed
public utility communications facility. On November 2, 2000, Creative Visuals, Inc. conducted an
on-site visit to obtain familiarity with the site and surrounding area. Thirteen (13) off-site "View
Points" proximate to the site were selected for analysis as areas of potential visual impact.
Photosimulations were prepared from View Points where the proposed replacement pole would be
visible. These photographic simulations were then used to determine visual impact of the proposed
replacement monopole.
Analog photographs were taken from each of the View Points by Creative Visuals, Inc. on
November 2, 2000 between 10:20 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. Weather conditions were sunny with variable
winds. These photographs presented a reference point for calculation of the proposed 110-~ foot high
replacement monopole via two 18" x 17" red flags attached to a crane, as seen from each View Point
(where visible). The existing structure as well as drawings furnished by Sprint Spectnnn, L.P. served
as a reference point for the placement and simulation of the proposed 110-~= foot high replacement
monopole with antennas.
The site and then each View Point were located on a digitized NYSDOT contour map. AutoCAD
was used to create a model of the actual proposed sector antenna attachments using dimensions and
drawings furnished by Sprint. Other software was then used to photorealistically render the facility
as seen from each View Point, maintaining the perspective of the analog photos. The
communications facility (antennas and equipment shelter) was imported into the computer with the
actual dimensions as a vectorized three-dimensional model. The antennas and equipment shelter
were assigned photorealistic materials; photographs of a similar sector antenna attachment and
equipment were used to facilitate this process.
13
Finally, the photorealistically rendered antennas and equipment were inserted and merged into the
digitized site photographs. The complete methodology for the photograph/c simulations is included
in Appendix B. A Photograph Location Map is included as Figure 5.
The following View Points are presented for analysis:
Description of View Point
View Point 1 -
From in front of 260 Elijah's Lane
(simulation prepared).
Approximate Distance
to Proiect Site
324 feet
View Point 2 - From the intersection of S.R. 25 and 420 feet
Eastward Court. (Crane and flags not visible,
therefore no simulation prepared).
View Point 3 - From the end of Eastward Court (cul-de-sac) in 947 feet
fi'ont of 635 Eastward Court. (Crane and
flags barely visible, therefore no simulation
prepared).
View Point 4 -
View Point 5 -
View Point 6 -
From the intersection of S.R. 25 and
Cardinal Drive (entrance to Mattituck Estates).
(Crane and flags not visible, therefore no
simulation prepared).
From the end of Azalea Road (cul-de-sac) in fi-ont
of 50 Azalea Road. (Crane and flags not visible,
therefore no simulation prepared).
From the intersection of Theresa Drive and
New Suffolk Avenue. (simulation prepared).
From near 6350 New Suffolk Avenue.
(Crane and flags not visible, therefore no
simulation prepared).
From near 305 Hall's Creek Drive.
(Crane and flags not visible, therefore no
simulation prepared).
View Point 7 -
View Point 8
1,508 feet
1,091 feet
2,333 feet
2,333 feet
3,429 feet
14
View Point 9 -
View Point 10 -
View Point 11 -
View Point 12 -
View Point 13 -
From near 2463 Elijah's Lane. (Crane and
flags not visible, therefore no simulation prepared).
From near 1945 Elijah's Lane (simulation prepared).
From near 1250 Elijah's Lane (simulation prepared).
From the intersection of New Suffolk Avenue and
Hall's Creek Drive. (simulation prepared).
From S.R. 25 near Locust Avenue (Evergreen Lane).
(Crane and flags barely visible, therefore no
simulation prepared).
2,120 feet
1,608 feet
921 feet
3,324 feet
1,309 feet
15
V~ ~
O~
Visual Impact Analysis
The results of the visual simulation analysis are summarized below with simulations included in
Appendix B.
View Point 1:
The existing conditions depicted in View Point 1, taken from in front of
260 Elijah's Lane (324 feet from the project site), show the existing
100-z- foot monopole with three sets o f cellular communications antennas
amongst the overhead utility poles and lines that run along Elijah's Lane
and the subject property. Trees and the existing warehouse building block
the majority of views associated with the equipment on the ground
surface. The photographic simulation from View Point I shows the
proposed I 10~ foot replacement monopole (including the two additional
proposed carders) amongst the overhead utility lines and trees. Views
associated with the higher replacement pole will not be significantly
different, although the new antennas will be visible.
View Point 2:
As seen from View Point 2 (420 feet from the project site), the existing
100.4- foot monopole and associated equipment are not visible from the
intersection of S.R. 25 and Eastward Court. Also, as the crane and flags
depicting the 110~ foot high monopole were not visible, the replacement
monopole would not be visible fi'om this View Point. As such, no
photographic simulation was performed.
17
View Point 3:
View Point 3 (947 feet from the project site) shows that the existing 1004-
foot monopole is barely visible among the top of the trees as seen from
in front of 635 Eastward Court (at the end of the cul-de-sac). The
difference in height from the existing to the replacement monopole is
barely perceptible. During the winter months, views of the facility may
be slightly mom prominent as large deciduous trees are present in the
current photograph. Note that overhead utility lines are prominently
visible in this area. No photographic simulation was prepared, as the
crane with flags was barely visible from this area. However, an arrow
indicates the location of the top of the replacement pole.
View Point 4:
As seen from View Point 4 (1,508 feet from the project site) the existing
1004- foot monopole is not visible from the intersection of S.R. 25 and
Cardinal Drive (at the entrance to Mattituck Estates). Large trees are
present in the photograph. Overhead utility lines along the roadways are
prominently visible in the horizon from this location. The crane and flags
depicting the height of the proposed 1104- foot replacement monopole
were not visible. Thus, no photographic simulation was performed since
the proposed 1104- foot replacement monopole would not be visible from
this location.
View Point 5:
As seen from Viewpoint 5 (1,091 feet from the project site), the existing
1004- foot monopole is not visible fi.om in front of 50 Azalea Road (at the
end of the cul-de-sac). Large trees and overhead utility lines are present
in the photograph. No photographic simulation was prepared for View
Point 5, since the crane and flags associated with the proposed 1104- foot
monopole were not visible from this location.
18
ViewPoint 6:
View Point 6, taken from the intersection of Theresa Drive and New
Suffolk Avenue (2,333 feet from the project site), shows that the existing
100± foot monopole is visible from this location. The simulated view
from View Point 6 shows that the proposed 110± foot replacement
monopole (including the two additional proposed carriers) would also be
visible from this location. However, as indicated by the simulation, views
associated with the proposed facility will not be significantly different
than those currently associated with the existing facility.
View Point 7:
View Point 7, taken from near 6350 New Suffolk Avenue (2,333 feet
from the project site and slightly west of View Point 6), shows that the
existing I00-~ foot monopole is not visible from this location. Also, the
crane and flags depicting the proposed 110± foot replacement monopole
were not visible. Therefore, no photographic simulation was prepared.
View Point 8:
As seen from Viewpoint 8 (3,429 feet from the project site and slightly
south of View Point 12) the existing 100± foot monopole is not visible
from near 305 Hall's Creek Drive. Deciduous trees are present in the
photograph. The crane and flags depicting the proposed 110± foot
replacement monopole were not visible. Therefore, no photographic
simulation was prepared as the replacement monopole would not be
visible from this location.
19
View Point 9:
As seen from View Point 9 (2,120 feet from the project site) the existing
100~ foot monopole is not visible from near 2463 Elijah's Lane.
Overhead utility poles are prominently visible along Elijah's Lane in this
area. No photographic simulation was prepared since the crane and flags
associated with the proposed 110-~ foot replacement pole were not visible
from this location.
View Point I0:
View Point 10, taken from near 1945 Elijah's Lane (1,608 feet from the
project site), shows that the existing 100± foot is visible from this
location. Overhead utility poles that nm along the east side of Elijah's
Lane are also prominent on the horizon from this location. The simulated
view from View Point 10 shows that the proposed 110± foot replacement
monopole (including the two additional proposed carders) would also be
visible from this location, amongst the overhead utility poles on Elijah's
Lane. However, as illustrated in the simulation, the difference in height
among the poles is barely imperceptible.
View Point 11:
View Point 11, taken from near 1250 Elijah's Lane (921 feet from the
project site), shows that the upper portion of the existing 100± foot
monopole is visible from this location. Overhead utility poles that mn
along the east side of Elijah's Lane are also prominent on the horizon
from this location. The simulated view from View Point 11 shows that
the proposed 110-~ foot replacement monopole would also be visible from
this location, amongst the overhead utility poles and wires on Elijah's
Lane.
20
View Point 12:
View Point 12 (3,324 feet from the project site) shows that the existing
100-~= foot monopole is barely visible from the intersection of New
Suffolk Avenue and Hall's Creek Drive. Note that views of the overhead
utility lines situated along the roadways in this area are more prominent
on the horizon than views associated with the project site. However, as
indicated by the simulation, views associated with the proposed
expansion will not be substantially different than those associated with
the existing facility.
View Point 13:
From View Point 13 (1,309 feet from the project site) the existing 100~
foot monopole is barely visible among the top of the trees as seen fi.om
near the intersection of S.R. 25 and Locust Avenue (Evergreen Lane).
During the winter months, views of the facility may be slightly more
prominent, as large deciduous trees are present in the current photograph.
Note that overhead utility lines are prominently visible on the horizon in
this area. No photographic simulation was prepared, as the crane with
flags depicting the proposed 110-4- foot replacement pole was barely
visible fi.om this location. However, an arrow indicates the top of the
replacement monopole.
21
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
Based upon an inspection of the existing communications facility site and surrounding areas,
analysis of the surrounding land use, zoning and environmental conditions, evaluation of
characteristics of the proposed communications facility and an analysis of the photographic
simulations, the following findings can be made:
From a planning perspective, the proposed site is an optimal location for the
proposed 110~- foot replacement monopole and associated equipment since it is
situated within an existing communications compound that currently contains a 100-~=
foot monopole and is located to the rear of a warehouse.
The replacement monopole will be approximately 10 feet higher than the existing
monopole. The photographic simulations demonstrate that visibility of the proposed
replacement monopole and new antenna arrays would be generally similar to views
associated with the existing facility. The proposed equipment would not be visible
from most surrounding areas as it will be located to the rear of the warehouse
building behind and be obscured from view by the existing equipment. In addition,
the existing communications compound is surrounded by vegetation along three
sides of the facility.
The existing facility is intermittently visible along S.R. 25 (in the vicinity of the
subject site) due to presence of vegetation. The residential properties located along
Elijah's Lane are intermittently obscured from views of the facility by vegetation as
well. While the existing facility is visible fi.om the residential subdivision to the
north, the incremental height increase of the replacement pole (which is proposed
to be approximately 10 feet taller) would be barely perceptible from the locations
discussed above.
22
The existing facility is not visible from the majority of the residential areas located
to the southeast and southwest of the project site. This will not change with the 10
foot increase in height associated with the replacement pole. However, specific
properties will continue to experience intermittent views of the facility depending
upon the exact location and season.
The Telecommunications Act of 1996, the federal law that governs wireless
communications facilities, encourages co-location, which is the location of multiple
antennas on the same site. Replacing the existing monopole (100-a= feet) with one just
ten feet higher (110~ feet) allows co-location among five communications carriers,
which helps to minimize the potential for development of different monopoles in the
same area and serves to minimize potential cumulative visual impacts.
There will be a minimal impact on the environmental conditions of the site and the
surrounding area as the proposed replacement monopole and associated equipment
will be situated within an existing communications compound. The facility will
remain unmanned and will not generate sanitary sewage or water usage.
Given the extent and nature of the service deficiency experienced by Sprint Spectrum, L.P., this
location is optimal from a planning perspective as it is situated within an existing communications
compound. The visibility of the expanded communications compound from surrounding areas will
be confined to those areas that presently contain views of the existing facility, and the change in
height associated with the replacement pole will be barely pemeptible, although the additional
antennas would be visible from some locations. In conclusion, the proposed project will have
minimal visual impacts on the surrounding community.
23
APPENDIX A
FREIIDENTHAL ~ ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, [NC.
Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility
Elijah's Lane, Mattituck
Photoeranh No. 1: View of warehouse and existing Public Utility
Communications Facility taken from Elijah's Lane facing west.
Photoeranh No. 2: Closer view of existing communications compound taken
from south side of warehouse facing west.
FREUDENTHAL & ELKOwITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility
Elijah's Lane, Mattituck
Photoeranh No. 3: Northwest view taken inside existing communications
compound showing area proposed to be expanded (along fence).
Photoeraoh No. 4: View facing west of Lindsay's Ail Pro Auto Parts taken from
Elijah's Lane. This facility is situated to the south of the subject site.
FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULT]INiG GROUP, INC.
Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility
Elijah's Lane, Mattituck
Photograoh No. 5: View facing southeast on Elijah's Lane taken from roadway
in front of subject site (showing intersection of S.R. 25 and Elijah's Lane in
background).
Photoeraph No. 6: View facing east from corner of S.R. 25 and Elijah's Lane
showing vineyards along south side of S.R. 25.
FREUDENTHAL & ELKOwITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility
Elijah's Lane, Mattituck
Photouranh No. 7: View toward subject site facing northwest from corner of
S.R. 25 and Locust Avenue.
Photogranh No. 8: View facing north from corner of Evergreen Lane and S.R.
25 showing Christmas Tree Farm.
FREUDENTHAL & ELKOwrrZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility
Elijah's Lane, Mattituck
Photoerauh No. 9: View toward subject site facing north taken from corner of
New Suffolk Avenue and Donna Drive (showing existing facility).
Photograph No. 10: View toward subject site looking southeast from corner of
Tabor Road and Gabriella Court (showing existing facility).
FREUDENTHAL & ELKOwrrZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
,&PPEND LX B
FREUDENTtiAL & Rl.KOwrrZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
VISUAL ANALYSIS
REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE
Elijah's Lane & Route 25
Southold, NY
Prepared For
Sprint Spectrum LP
Prepared By
Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc.
November 2000
Creative Visuals, Inc.
Cold Brook Road
Post Office Box 435
Bearsville, NY 12409
Phone (914) 679-9055 Fax (914) 679-1175
November 11, 2000
Mr. Jeff Kitt
Sprint Spectrum L.P.
One Intematiounl Boulevard, Suite 800
Mahwah, NJ 07495
RE: Sprint Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility
Dear Mr. Kitt:
Creative Visuals, Inc., in conjunction with Virtually Real Inc., has prepared an accurate visual study containing
photo-realistic renderings oft. he proposod Public Utility Communications Facility ("Facility'), consisting of an 110' tall
replacement munopole with antennas, proposed by Sprint Spectrum L.P. at Elijah's Lane and Route 25, Southhold, New
York. The proposed 110' tall monopole would replace tho existing 100' tall monopole that currently has AT&T Wireless
panel antennas, Nextel Communications whip antennas, and Omnipoint panel antennas. The replacement monopole would
have amennas mounted by five carriers: the aforementioned three carriers on the existing pole in addition to Sprint
Spectrum L.P and Verizon Wireless as depicted on the plans prepared by Papay Enginoering& Construction Inc., the
applicant's consultants. Creative Visuals, Inc. in conjunction with Virtually Real, Inc., has prepared an accurate visual
impact study of the completed site, utilizing the process described bolow.
A two-man team made an on-site visit to obtain familiarity with the terrain and its surrounding residential
neighborhoods. The proposed site is located adjacent to the existing 100' monopole. Thirteen off-site points ("View Points")
were selected within close proximity of the site from which five were chosen for photo representation of the completed
facility:
Description of View Point
Approximate Distance to Site
View Point 1 - from m front of 260 Ehjah's Lane;
324'
View Point 2 - from the intersection of Route 25 and Eastward Court,
crane not visible;
420'
View Po/nt 3 - from the end of the Eastward Court cul-de-sac, in front of
635 Eastward Court, red arrow indicates the location of the top of the crane;
947'
View Point 4 - from the intersection of Route 25 and Cardinal Drive,
crane not visible;
1,508'
View Point 5 - from the Azalea Road cul-de-sac, in front of 50 Azalea Road,
crane not visible;
1,091'
View Point 6 - from the intersection of Theresa Drive and New Suffolk Avenue;
2,333'
View Point 7 - from near 6350 New Suffolk Avenue, crane not visible;
2333'
View Point 8 - from near 305 Hall's Creek Drive, crane not visible; 3,429'
View Point 9 - from near 2463 Elijah's Lane, crane not visible; 2,120'
View Point 10 - from near 1945 Elijah's Lane;
1,608'
View Point 11 - from near 1250 Elijah's Lane;
921'
View Point 12 - from the intersection of New Suffolk Avenue and Hall's Creek Drive; 3,324'
View Point 13 - from Route 25, near Locust Avenue, red arrow indicates the
location of the top of the crane.
1,309'
Larry Heimel took analog photographs of the site from each of the View Points under study, shooting Kodak Royal
Gold 200 ASA print film with a Nikon F-5 and N-70 camera, each with a fixed 50mm lens. Two cameras were used to
provide an "insurance" shot. The photos were taken on November 2, 2000 between 10:20 A.M and 1:30 P.M.; conditions
were sunny skies with variable winds. These photos presented a reference point for calculation of the structure's placement,
via two 18"xl7" red flags attached to a crane. The flags were set at 110' AGL (Above Ground Level) above the location of
the proposed replacement monopole site.
The negatives were scanned at 2700 dpi (dots per inch) and then digitized as 26MB high-resolution files. The site
and each View Point were then locked on a digitized DOT contour map. AutoCAD was used to create a model of the actual
proposed structure.
A separate, 3-D software, 3D Studio Max, was then used to photorealistically render the facility as seen from each
of the photo simulation View Points, maintaining the perspective of a 50mm lens. This was achieved by exporting the
"model" of the monopole (along with the location of the View Points, crane reference points and monopole) inW 3D Studio
Max from AutoCAD as a DXF file. The 3D soi~vare utilized this imported file to reference the facility, two red flags
~ttached to the crane and View Point locations, thus maintaining their relative X, Y and Z distances. The facility was also
unported with its actual dimensions as a vectorized 3D model. Each View Point including the site was elevated to its proper
AMSL. 3D Studio Max cameras were set at each View Point's X, Y and Z location and photographed the model monopole
with a 50mm lens (correlating to our analog 50mm photos). The X, Y and Z coordinates allowed the 3D camera to render
the structure to its correct scale, rotation and angle from each View Point.
The monopole was assigned "photoreahstic" materials in the software's materials editor; a photograph of the
existing similar and other facilities were used to facilitate this process. 3-D Max software simulated sunlight on the
monopole, taking into account the site latitude, date and time of day of the View Point photographs. Finally, the existing
monopole and crane were digitally removed from the photograph and the photorealistieally-rendered monopole was inserted
and merged with the photograph of the existing monopole into the digitized site photos we had taken and converted from
26MB files into digitized photographs.
Conclusion
Based upon our over eleven years' experience in visual analysis, as well as analyzing over 200 public utility
structure sites throughout the region, we are confident that the enclosed visual study accurately reflects the appearance of
the Facility, consisting ora 110'foot tall monopole located at the captioned site.
APPENDIX C
FREUDENTHAL & ELKOwrrZ CONSULTIAIG GROUP, INC.
FREUDENTHAL & ELKOW TZ CONSULT NG GROUR
The~es~ Elkowii2, President
Hugo D. F~u&uthd (R~¢irdA994)
CURRICULUM VITAE
OF
THERESA ELKOWITZ
568 Yeterans 3lemori,al High~y
Commack, New 'York 11725
%h (65t) 499-2223
F~,: (651) 499-5928
OVERVIEW
Theresa Elkowitz is the president of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. (F&E), an
environmental and planning consulting finn. She is well-versed in the State Environmental Review
Quality (SEQR) process. Not only has she worked with public and private clients on the
administration of the SEQR, but she also serves as Chairperson of the Suffolk County Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ). The CEQ is responsible for recommending SEQR determinations,
holding public hearings and adminislxation of the environmental review process for actions proposed
by the County of Suffolk.
Prior to forming F&E, Mrs. Elkowitz spent several years managing environmental projects for a
consulting engineering firm. She has been involved in many diverse projects including the
preparation of Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), Local Waterfront
Revitalization Programs, wetland evaluations, water use and conservation plans, municipal and
private planning studies, grant applications, as well as solid waste management plans and Part 360
permit applications.
Before entering the field of environmental and planning consulting, Mrs. Elkowitz was employed
by the Town of Brookhaven Department of Housing, Community Development and
Intergovernmental Affairs. She was responsible for preparing environmental assessments for
community development projects in accordance with SEQR Act and the National Environmental
Protection Act (NEPA).
Representative projects/documents which Mrs. Elkowitz has supervised, prepared and/or had a
significant preparatory role include, but are not limited to:
DEIS and related SEQR/CEQR Documentation for Kensico Water Pollution Control
Program for New York City Department of Environmental Protection;
DEIS and related SEQRJCEQR Documentation for Fresh Kills Landfill for New
York City Department of Sanitation;
DEIS for Rezoning of 147+ acre Nassau County Property for Nassau County;
DEIS and FEIS for Rezoning of 170+ acre Roosevelt Raceway for property owner;
2
DEIS and FEIS for development of 22+ acre commercial center in Stony Brook for
private applicant;
LWRP and environmental and planning tasks for Incorporated Village of
Manorhaven;
DEIS and FEIS for 200+ unit Planned Retirement Community in Amityville for
private applicant;
DGEIS for creation of Incentive Zoning District for the Town of Goshen;
DEIS and FEIS for 23+ acre subdivision in the Village of Kings Point for private
applicant, USACOE and NYSDEC wetland applications and presentations at public
hearings;
DEIS and FEIS for a commercial building in Woodmere, securing of NYSDEC and
USACOE wetland permits, presentations at public hearings;
Preparation of an EAF and environmental report for a proposed solid waste
management recycling facility in Brookhaven;
EAF and Environmental Report for proposed 40 unit residential development for the
deaf in Coram;
DEIS and FEIS for residential and commercial development in Riverhead, securing
a NYSDEC Freshwater Wetland Permit;
DEIS and FEIS for waterfxont condominium complex in Freeport, expert testimony
on wetlands and representation of client before Freeport Planning Board, preparation
of NYSDEC and USACOE Wetland Applications;
DEIS and FEIS for corporate park in Holbrook, data collection and preparation of
economic analysis report for proposed corporate park;
DEIS and FEIS for 80 unit residential condominium complex in Coram, preparation
of wetland application;
FEIS for an affordable housing development in Riverhead, preparation of an
Affordable Housing Corporation Grant Application;
DEIS for Lakeville Energy Project Cogeneration Plant in New Hyde Park;
3
DEIS and detailed water use and conservation study for Marriott Hotel expansion,
Uniondale, expert testimony associated with SEQR process;
DEIS and FEIS for residential subdivision in BeekmanfEast Fishkill, expert
testimony associated with SEQR process;
DEIS and FEIS for an office condominium complex in Wantagh, expert testimony
associated with SEQR process, preparation of NYSDEC freshwater wetland permit
application;
DEIS and FEIS for a shopping center in Patchogue, expert testimony associated with
SEQR process.
EXPERIENCE
Principal and Corporate President. Responsible for operations of a multi-disciplined
environmental and planning consulting firm. Technical tasks include the preparation of
environmental impact statements; environmental assessment forms; site assessments;
waterfront revitalization programs; wetland evaluations; planning studies; and various permit
applications and related analyses for public and private clients. Environmental presentations
and expert testimony before various municipal boards and community groups.
Administrative tasks include all business operations, personnel management, budgeting,
billing, marketing etc. Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc., 368 Veterans
Memorial Highway, Commack, New York. August, 1988 - Present.
Environmental Project Manager/Planner. Responsible for the preparation of environmental
impact statements, environment assessments and planning studies for private clients and
municipalities. Environmental presentations and testimony to Town Boards and Planning
Boards. Preparation of various New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nassau County Depmhnent of Health and Suffolk County
Department of Health Services permit applications. Coordination of State Environmental
Quality Review procedures. Site evaluations and environmental assessments for real estate
developers. Administrative functions including proposal and contract preparation, budget
analysis, and billing. Supervision of professional and support staff. Baldwin & Cornelius,
P.C., 210 Express Street, Plainview, New York. December, 1986 -August, 1988.
4
Neighborhood Aide/Assistant to the Housing Rehabilitation Administrator. Completion of
environmental reviews for ail Community Development projects in accordance with SEQR
and NEPA. Preparation of grant proposais. Assisted in the first affordable housing program
for the Town of Brookhaven- the Neighborhood Homes Program. Credit feasibility anaiyses
for SONYMA mortgage applicants. Interviewing for residential rehabilitation, materiais
grant and townwide handicap ramp programs, evaluation of applications and subsequent loan
recommendations. Monitoring and coordinating of the Materials Grant and Townwide
Handicap Ramp programs, monitoring of loan repayments and analysis of project income.
Solicitation of consultants and engineers for public works projects. Coordination of public
works projects and contract compliance with federai regulations. Preparation of budgets and
recommendations for policy changes. Town of Brookhaven Depmtment of Housing,
Community Development and Intergovernmental Affairs, 3233 Route 112, Medford, New
York. November, 1983 -November, 1986.
Instructor. Preparation of and teaching biweekly recitations in algebra and introductory
microeconomics, private tutoriais, assigning and grading homework and examinations.
Association for Public Policy and Management Summer Institute for Minority Students, W.
Averell Harriman College for Policy Anaiysis and Public Management, State University of
New York at Stony Brook, New York. Summer, 1983, 1984 and 1985.
EDUCATION
M.S., Policy Analysis and Public Management; W. Averell Harriman College for Policy
Analysis and Public Management. May, 1985.
B.A., Liberal Arts; State University of New York at Stony Brook. May, 1985.
SPECIAL PROJECTS
Consultant. Responsible for the formulation, implementation and administration of the
Residential Rehabilitation Program for the Incorporated Village of Lake Grove. Tasks
include interviewing clients, evaluating applications, program coordination, project
monitoring and payments. Fail, 1985 -1987.
Graduate Workshop. Statisticai anaiysis of usage of the Mastic-Moriches-Shirley
Community Library. Recommendations to the Library's Board of Trustees regarding how
to increase community patronage and involvement. Spring, 1984.
MEMBERSHIPS
Chairperson, Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality.
Environment Committee of the Long Island Association
Board of Directors, Long Island Builders Institute
HONORS, AWARDS AND DESIGNATIONS
Certified Environmental Specialist and Certified Environmental Inspector, Environmental
Assessment Association, 1994.
Magna Cum Laude Graduate, State University of New York at Stony Brook. May, 1985.
Winner, Presidemial Management Intern Program. Spring, 1985.
print Spectrum L.P.
SPRINT IMPLEMENTATION:
VERIZON:
AT&:T WIRELESS COLOCATION:
POWER:
TELCO:
SWITCH:
SITE:
A/E:
KEYSPAN
(FILE: 65339040)
AMY NOLLER
(201) 684-4009
JOHN GOMEZ
ALEX DEFRANCIS
(20~) 576-2:S5
- BOB DELANEY
(631) ~48-7045
CONRAD HOENIO
(651) 687-8522
(516) 827-2800
WILLIAM BAXTER
(561) 225-4492
PETER PAPAY
(201) 934-2828
PROJECT CONTACTS
SITE NUMBER:
SITE ADDRESS:
OWNER:
CO-APPLICANTS:
LEGAL
NY53XC688/958285
ELIJAN'S LANE &: ROUTE 25
SOUTHOLD, NY
WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR,
1050 E. PUTNAM AVENUE
GREENWICH, CT 06550
SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER
INTERNATIONAL BLVD., BTE. 800
MAHWAH, NJ 07495
N%MSA LIIVlFED PARTNERSHIP
DBA: VERIZON WIRELESS
FKA: BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE
60 HERRICKS ROAD
MINEOLA, NY 11501
DESCRIPTION:
BEING ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND AND PREMISES
LOCATED IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK IN THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK AND
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD KNOWN AS LOT 11.3 IN BLOCK 4, SECTION 108,
DISTRICT 1000.
COORDINATES (NAD 85): LATITUDE: 4-0' 59' 57.9" LONGITUDE: 72° 50' 59.2"
ELEVATION: 50' AMSL
CURRENT ZONING: LB - LIMITED BUSINESS
PROJECT SUMMARY
wireless
SHEET REVISION
NUMBER DESCRIPTION DATE
T-1 TITLE SHEET 07/12/00
S-1 SiTE PLAN AND NOTES 07/12/00
S-lA KEY MAP 07/12/00
S-2 COMPOUND PLAN, ELEVATION AND DETAILS 07/12/00
S-5 DETAILB 07/12/00
S-4 DETAILS 07/12/00
SHEET INDEX
AIJG 3.1 2000
So'~thold ]'own
Planning aoard
PETER E, PAPAY
UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR
ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS
A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209
OF THE NEW YORK STATE
EDUCATION LAW.
N,Y, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO, 064690
PAPAY ENGINEERING ~: CONSTRUC'RON, INC.
100 HILLTOP ROAD, RAMBEY, NJ 074~4~
-- -Sprin(
Sprint Spectrum L.P.,
Crossroads Corporate Center
1 InterneUona[ Blvd., Ste. 800
Mohwah, New Jersey 07495
Phone' (201) 512-4700
Fax: (201) 512-471~
~"~wireless
60 HERRICKS ROAD
MINEOLA, NY 11501
(516) 294-1090
PROJECT NUMBER
IJ.D.P.
CHECKED BY
I P.E,P. ]
NO DATE ISSUE
0 07/12/00 APPROVAL
APPROVALS
PROJECT MANAGER: DATE:
SPRINT REP: . DATE:
YERIZON REP: DATE:
MA~ITUCK
S~E NUMBE~r
NY3SXC688/958283
ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25
SOUTHOLD, NY
DIST. 1000, SEC. 108
BLOCK 4-, LOT 11.5
EHEET TITLE
TITLE SHEET
SHEET NUMBER
T-I
AI 'ENNA SCHEDULE (ALL CARRIERS)
ELEVAllON AND QU.NiITIY OF ANTENNAS,
C. ARRIER ANll[NNA MODEL AND STATOS REFERENCE SECTORS PER SECTOR AZIMUfTHS COMMENTS
SPRINI DBgDOHBOT2m (PROPOSED) 110' (TOPS) 5 5 540, 110, 250 CPS UNIT AT 110'
CURRENTEY THREE ANTENNAS ~1~ PER
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES ALP llOll-N (EXiSllflO) 98' (CENTERUNE) 5 4 50, 150, 240 SECTOR, FOUR ARE PROPOSED PER SECTOR.
EX)SIINO WI~iES ON EXlSq)NG POLE TO BE
NEXTEL BMR-OB-OOOll-OD (PROPOSED) gO' (TOPS) 5 4 30, 150, 270 ~PIJ~CED WITH P~EL ANTENNAS SHOWff HERE
VERIZON WIRELESS ALPgOllE (PROPOSED) 80' (TOPS) 3 4 102, 222, 342'CPS UNFF AT SHELTER ROOF
MOUNTED llOHT TO POLE USING TRI-BRAOXET
OMNIPOINT mS RRgO-17-OODP (EXISTING) 05' (TOPS) 5 1 30, 15D, 270 ASSE)~BUES AND TRI-SECTOR ASSmBUES
CONNELLY & MASTON
535 ELIJAH'S LANE
MATFITUCK, NY 11952
~ ~. EXIBT~NO UTILITY GENERAL CON8TRUCTIONNOTE8
,~ /~LE (1YP.)
/
"~. / .4RE NOT PROPOSED. RE-CRADINC IS NOT PEOPROED
^~' FJ~UR~ ~E PRO~SED RO ORORAE F~M DU~ TO D~N, BY THE D~EC~ON OF P~AY ENGINEERING ~ CONS~UC~ON~ lNG
, SHELTER 100 HI~P RO~, ~SB, Nd 07~6
/ 20t-93~-2~8
.~x~ ~ NE~ RIGHm,S OF ~AY OR ~SE~ENTS ~E PROPOSED
%', ~ ~E~LmoN OF EXISTING ITEMS SHOWN. mE CO~RACTOR 5~LL ~ PROV)SO~
~ tie ~ ~'
(opp~x.) 5'~ ~ F~IL~ZJNG HI,SELF WiTH ALL CONTACT DOCUUE~S. FELD COND~IONS ~D
~ ~ ~ ~'%"% ¢ I0. OlUENaONS SHOWN ~E TO RNISH SURFERS UNL~ OTHER~iSE NOTED SPACiN¢~ Crossroods Corporote Center
SPRINT ORIENTATION &¢ ./'/ EXIST UTmLmm~ "~ )z IaSTALL ~ ROUiP~ENT ~B UATER~ )N ~CORD~CE ~ UANUFAC~RO~
./../// ' POLE ~ / .~..~, oEmNsmu"mo"'REGU~oNsUNLESST*K[ PEE~DENCE.SPECFI~LLY OTHER,iRE INDICATED ~ WHERE LODAL CODES
~ t~e . HUNTER ~t/ 13 THE CO~ J~&L Nolm~ ~[ COHST~CT~N M~ER ~ ~L P~D~S OR
%-% 55 SUNDANCE DR)VD _%0~¢~x¢ ~ ITEms MORRO ~ EXISTINO1' ~rOH ARE NOT FOUND TO BE iN IHS RELD,
UNO'GROUND .*~ /
~CTOR SHALL G~ ALL ~OTrCB ~D CG.PLY ~IT~ AE ~,
. CL~INO~ ) ~ / / O0~S. THE NAT)O~L EEC~[C 00~. ~D ~L~ COmPlY SP[OIF~ARONS. (51 61 294-1090
10~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ 15 A~ WOAN SHA[ ~ PERF'"RD mN STBOT ACCORDANCE WiTH &L C~. STA?E ~O
VERIZON ORIE~A~ON ~¢ ../" ~/ USE THE r~iLm~ ~D P"E~iSES. TFm~ CONTRA~OR SH~L SOHEDU~ AND
%~% SH~ BE ROSPONSIBLE FO, COORD~AIIRO HIS WO*~ ~TH IHS WORK OF OTHERS P.E.P.
~ ~. ~ ./,./,, NO DA~ ~E
NEiCHLEY ,/-
~Ro ~ / ~RO- WHIEH ARE PERFORRED BY OTHERS,
PATCHOGUE, NY 11772 ../' GOD6 ARPRORED MATERIALS ALL EXTERIOR PENBRATIONS SHALL BE W~THE~ROOF, 0 07/12/00 ~P~V~
./ ~ ~ 2D, DET~LS ANE IN~NDED 10 ~0~ END RESULT OF DESIGN, M~NOR M~IFIOAT~NS DAY
~ -'/"/ COMPOUND ~ /' ~ BE INCLUDED AS P~T OF mE ~ORK
%~ ~ ~ .- 21 THE CONT~ SH~ ~E ~L NEC~Y PROMSIONS TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING
P~
k / % ~ ~ %BLOCK IELECOM
/ ¢ ~ %' ~ AGGREGATE TELECOM /"
./ WILLIAM J. B~TER, JR.
~ ./' 1030 ~ST PUTNAM AVENUE
/ ~ ../- GREENWICH, CT 06850
/ //
,./,/'/~ GRAPHIC SCAI,E
OF m-NE SRNTACE IS NOT CO~4PROMIROD APPROVALS
FOR SUGH DEVIATIONS PROJECT UANAOER: DATE:
25. THE CONTRACTOR SH~O SUPERAISE AND DI~CT THE WORK USING THE REST SPRINT REP: DATE:
OONSTRUCllON SKILLS AND AITENT~ON THE OONTRAGTOR SHALL RE SOLELY
IECNNIOUEG. SEQUERDES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COOROINA~NG ALL PORTIONS VERIZDN REP: DATE:
OF THE WORK UNDE~ GONTI~ACm'. UNLESS CONTWAGT DODU~ENT$ CWE
BULK REQUIREMENT8
ZONING DISTRICT: LB - HUffED BUSINESS
LOT 1l,~, BLO0~ 4, [CT. la8, DIb'l', 1000 PERMIT[ED OR
REQUIRED ~1~ PROPOSED
kilN. LOT ~EA(SO, FT,) 80,000 80,507 NO
I~N, LOT WID~I (FI~) 175 197,5 NO CHANGE
~N, LOT DERTI (FEET) 250 474,2 NO CH.N, IGE
FIN. FRONT Y~D (~EET) 100 76,2 NO CHANGE
MI,. m~E f~e, )NE/mm (~) 20/45 4.B/5D.~ NO CH~gE
~N. RBR Y~ (FED) 75 231 NO CH~gE
L~N~SCAPE ~ (~) 35 >54. -2,1~
LOT COVERAGE (~) 20 12.6 +.6
~, BUILOING HBg~fr (FEEl') 35 100 110
'R. LOG^m'E*"D X-G,m'AL, UNOE,G,ORNGD,X,,SS^ND UCTURERTHRO=.THE ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25
OF EXlSTIRC UTRAnES ^,D?OR ,m,RUGm,DRER SOUTHOLD NY
3O 'O 5" LCQ"PLY'ITHN YORK=ATCE ,OYCON ATIONCONST CT Nco DIST. 1000, SEC. 108
BLOCK 4, LOT 11.5
SITE PLAN AND NOTES
PETER E. PAPAY
LEGEND
-- LIGHT LINES DENOTE EXISTII'Ill CONDITIONS
-- HE. AW UNES DEHOII~ PROPOSED CONDmONE ~z~_~_.~=.~,~,~.~__._: ~
HILIIARD & GONZALEZ
P.O BOX 248 --E-- POI~'R WIRING UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ·
NEW SUFFOLH, NY 11956 ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS Y
~ --T-- 1ELESHONE WIRINg A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 %. OD~e~ q
'%,% EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES OF THE NEW YORK STATE
--31-- EXISTING CONTOUR EDUCATION LAW.
N,Y. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO, 064690
.,a.~rox: NOIR: FAA OBSTRUCTION MkRt(]NO L.-t~MINAIlON IS
EXISllNG I~EE TO BE R I FAA STROBE A~D ' ~ AS MF'D BY MICROFLECT
('rfP, FOR 5) MARKER LIGHTS ~ i
/"~'~ \ // ~/, ^ \ ~xl ./ ~//2~SPRINT PANED ANFENNA ' WAVEOUDE DHA/~NEI TO
12'X30'VERIZON/ ] ".. \ //~'-~ V/, //~x.. PROVIDE SURFACE ~RE~FJ~' ~""~ 110':~ ~ / ~O'~P, FOR~,BSHOWN) I /~-PIPEHEAD JUMPER
EQUIPMENT SHELTER~-4/ \ \~/ ~ } V/x /-~V~THIN COMPOUND EX1ENSIOfl ~' itc -- .~ AK q 7 ~ PIPE HE~ MODEL 8509 AS
~ ~ "~ ' ~///// "~-.~ ,~ID 1'-0' BEYOND 230,'~' , ~ll~. ~ ~...._~EW~ (9,~ At~T~ E ~A~iT~cTi~Oi~ wC~AXs~-Ic~LES . ~UFD BY UICROFLECT
//~ ~ . ~ ~ ~/ ~ SPLINT ORIENTATION 9B ~ ........ /(.) 'I~mAL~N ~CERS (~.) ~ 3"e ~. ~. PIPE
· ,~// \ ~ /*~ ~/~'~, //~/, /4~UNDEmROUND UTlUn~ ~ ~=~=~ 4 HO,ZOmA SEP~ATION ~, m~P~E e 4'-O' O/Cm ~(~ ,/~' 0.9.) ~
.... ~ -~,~ ~.~ ~..~,.,~ ~ ~ ~MI~OF~CT PIPE ~G
~D U~NG ~RE~~~~ //// ~ ~' ~/A*~ ~//V~ k~ X~X ~/~ //' ~/' (opprox,} ~ ~ ~~, FOR 12, 8 SHOWN)~ ~ SUPPO~ C~ MODEL P~AY ENeINEERINe ~ C~RUCTION. INC.
C~OPY.~ 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~"EON P~EL ~ ~ND ~0 GROUND~ C~P ~ ~ MODEL B1717
EEPHONE ~ / ~ ELO ED M ' ~ .q[ ']~' t: ~
. . ,., ,..iA Sprint Spectrum L.P.
~ ~XmSTm.~ A,~ EQumPM,NT ~ : r . I. ~ , ~ ~ro~rOOd~ CorporokeCenter
EXISTING OMNI , / SHELTER (BEYOND) ~ B~D~ ~.) ~ 1 )n~ernotionol Bird., Ste. 800
: a~ '~-' ~ Phone: (201)
, ~ II ~ Fox: (201) 512-4715
PIERS ~ ........................ ~PAD ~ ~ .' ~ ~
7'-0~ HIGH : ~vxxz~x/>
~,o~,~,~ / ~ ~w,,? CABLE BRIDGE DETAIL
UND[RGROUN~ TELCO ~-?/ SC~ 1 =20'~ S~: NONE 60 HERRICKS ROAD
To um~ POLE ~ ~NEO~, NY
1, SEE SEQUENCE BELOW FOR ANTICIPATED SEQUENCE OF 1.PROVIDE SNAP-IN ADAPTERS AND PIPE LEG
~ ~/~ , CABLES TO SPRINT EQUIPMENT,
I
~ s~ ,~Cm~,T ,O,O~OL~ U~,U~*C~U~S ~*W,,CS ~0~ , 1259
110
ELL*~C.~ ~ ~ J.D.P.
2 X 6 PR~SU~
..... AT FU~ ..... ~" ~ D~SE G~ED ~GREGAE, CHECKED BY
FMONOPOLE REP~CEME~ SEQUENCE OF EVE~I ~~ ~. ,, NO DATE I~E
~ ~. D 07/12/00 ~PROV~
SUB~E OR ~PRO~ EQU~
~ ~ ,/ ~ PiNE (~P) j. ]NS~ALL AND GROUND NEW ANTENNAS FOR ALL CARPERS O~ REP~GEMENT MONOPOLE.
'. ./ ~ ~mT,~ pr~ NEW ~TENNAS SHALL BE IDE~,CAL TO THE EXISTING ANTENNAS (EXUEPT NEXTEL). MATCH E~iSTI.~ SURFACE TR~TMENT DETAIL
~ ~/ ~'~'~'~ ~IMUTHS AND DOWNTILT ANGLES. NEXTE[ ANTENNAS SHALL BE REPLACED AS SHOWN ON THE D~WINGS,~ S~: NONE
~COMPOUND P~N
6. SWEEP TEST N~ CABLES,
~ SC~; I"=10' ~ULK OP~I~ ~ Blg5
7~ COORDINATE CABLE CHANGEOVER WrTH ~CH CARRIE~. ~UMI~IC S~ APPROVALS
EXISTING CEILIN~ / ~PLY ~M~UM" B18~ S~NG T~E
G~HIC SCA[,~ 8. DISMANTLE AND REMOVE EXISTING CARES AND ANTENNAS FROM EXIS'HNG MONOPOLEf / ~N WAL ~ENING BEFORE ~A~GUIDE
,o , , ,o ~, ~ ~ // PROJECT MANAGER: DATE:
~ 9 DISMANTLE AND REMOVE EXISTING MO~OPOLE. ~Y ~ I~ON
_~ SPRI~ REP; DATE:
( ~ ~m~ ) ~RIZON REP: DATE:
1 ~ob = lo ~ --~ ~ ~ PRO, DE WA~GU(DE B~T ~
COORDI~ ~RUI~ON ~ -- ~CUSHIONS (~.)
FILER F~RD. MI~ ~OX POINT OF ~N~ ~
m~PRO~DE S~NG C~S AT UNUSED s~ ~
OPENmN~S
~.)
MATTITUCK
~ ~ ~TC" ~'~NG SURFACE~
NY53XC688/958285
, . ~~FOR E~Y PO~ OR ~RE-DRI~
~BmBED WI~ ~'~)~2 WEmmN~ Cm~'~> =~:m::a ~[ - m DIST. 1000, SEC. 108
r~'-, ~ ~v. w~ ~ ~~~ ~:~~ ~,~;~ -~,. : BLOCK 4, LOT 11.5
~-- wm~F~R,C-'-- ~~~~11111~ ~flSION ~DS ~ 14' O/C
~ F~RIG TO ~UCH G~UND ~ ~ ~ BU~DY ~ G~~~~' ' ~ ~ ~ ~-
I
~?l ~ ~ S~ SURFACE ~mE~ D~N~m3., SCHEDU~ ~ ~C E~cmmc~ _4~ ~HEDULE ~ PVC TEEPHONE -- ~ ~a~ ~E
SIDE FRONT WAVE~UIDE ENTRY DETAIL
' ~ ~ ' ~ 9 go. T~SmON WlRE~ ~m) ' ]) ~ ~uND cOmNNE~ON A
, m[m m mml -- UNDERGROUND UTILI T ENCH DETAIL NEXTEL ANTENNA ELEVATION CO~POUND
? I tml limn ELEVATmON AND DETAIL
~(12 REQUI~)
~ CpN~ FOO~N~ 8" D~ - ~. I II I U I
,- ~-0 D~ e CORNER ~ ~A~ P~ I - t ~ I P~ER E, PAPAY
~ ~ ~00 ~1 CONCR~ ~ ~ ~ MANUFACTURER: ANDREW CDRPORATION
~ ~,-o... ~ FENCE & GATE DETAIL ~ ~,o~,~ ~/~. ~o,~,,o~,,,~ ~,,, ,o,~ ~o, ,,~,,~ ,. ,,~o,~ ~,, ~u,,~ ~o O,G,,~ ~o,o,~,o,. ,o~. ~,,-o~-o~o~,-o~ ~o'., ,,, ~,~,
TELEPHONE RUN.
%s-p
S~: NONE 5, CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80. UV-RESISTAN7~ ~E~NUMBER
1. ALL FENCING & RE~TED ASSEMBLIES ~ILI~ LOCATING SERVICE. DEPTH. 5.0" UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR~
SHALL BE GALVANIZED ZiNC FINISH WEIGHT: 18.0 LBS. ADDITION 70 THIS DOCUMENT IS
(~RB WIRE-AST~ A121. FABRIC-ASTU 3. REMOVE A HAUL OFF-SiTE ALL EXCESS SITE ~IL A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 ~
A392-84, FRAUE WORK-ASTU F669-81. OF THE NEW YORK STATE
/
ADHERING TO TABLE Ii. 1-C.) EDUCATION ~W.
N,Y. PROE~IO~ ~GIN~ ND. 06~90
~ wG,/~ ~ P,ER ws,/~, P~ER 8PRINT ANTENNA 8CHEDULE 7 8PRINT EQUIPMENT DIMENSION8
* 6 EQUAL SPACES = 18'-9 1/2" AT E-CELL HECHANIC~ QI'f, ANT. QTY. N~T. QIY. MOB"rS OTY, CABLES QTf'. CABLES WIDTH DEPTH HEIGHT WEIGHT
7'-9" trPPC PIER SECTOR .~ .~J~Lg.]]~ HBGHT DOWNTILT ~ ~ ]]:J[S--JJ~.T~.~ FU]IJRE ]]JJ.%.JN~I~ ]]:[L~L.I]J~L~ FUTBRE CABINET (INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES) (POUNDS)
N..PHA 1 340' 110' ~OVE ORAOE (7 BOTfOM D8960HgOT2E-M 2 I 3 2 1
~' ~ BETA 2 1 I0' 110' /~80VE ORADE (7 BO1TOM §~60HgOT2E-M 2 I 3 2 1 POWB:~ PRO'ECl]ON C¢~BINET(PPC) 4B 20/11 60 250
F .... ]- - - { ~ pPc PIER CPS - 110' ~OVE GRN)E FURNISHED BY LU~CEIfr P0WB~ C,~INET 0'YPICN.) 31 30 66 1600
PPC CNilNB' I-~DNOLES FOR BOLTS ~ ~- 1,101~$;
~r -q ~ [ARE PROHIBrED /'"~ ". ANTENNAS LISTED MAY VARY, DEPENDING ON S¥Sll[M PERFORMANCE BATFERY CABINET 31 30 80 2880
/ I L .... WBX1B
3/4-" x 1/8' e 1 3/1¢ o/c A~ENN~ C~[E COVER ^SS'¥ (~cm) 35 29 14- 40
% ~ ~ ~_ I ST/~ID^RD SN)OLE CUP GRO~ffH CABINET (TfPICAL) 22 30 60 750 PAF'^Y EMelNEERINe & CONSTEUO130N. INC,
'- F^SIFJ~ERS T~3 x 2- 100 HILLTOP ROAD, RAMSEY, NJ 07444~
~ ~ ~,, / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;201-9~4--282e
~ * EDO'RNG DESIGN BASED
o. ,D6 MPN W,.O *.D
eL^SS 4 SOIL ~ BE'RJR:
I Iii WBX24-+l" :lx' ~°' BOOOPSI 11ffREADEDRODSW/LIEVEUNI~pRoJECllONGA__9. EAOHWA¥.4. ,. w~,o,.,.. ~u
I J J ~ ~ NON-~. PLAN PRO~ECTDN CA~INET . GHTING F1XTURE
gROLrf 4'-0" NORTH~N EOHNOLOglES ~UPPORT
~ ~B x ~ +r ~' ~ Y Sprint Spectrum L.P
- ~/8 X 24 +1" ¢ WG,/Z~ & PIER ~ ~ x 2 x l/& SFJ~_ WELD 1 rnternoUonel Blvd., Ste, 800
Mahweh, New Jersey 07495
'~ r Phone: (201) 512-4700
5 ¥B" PCS EQUIPMENT SUPPORT FRAME 7~ Po×: (2o0
e 10' O/'C -- 1/2"¢ HOL~ FOR
~o~ ~.) GRADE~LAYOUT ON PIERS ~mo~ REaOV~LE SEO~ON OF ~U-BOLT W/1 ~/2,
L-I/4~ OI/~JOND P~ AT ALL Fdl~JRE OVERSIZE WkSHERS
B/16"¢x 11/~'L /456~ DETAIL EQDIPaENT LOCAi'IONS ('TOP,) 6 VEiT (TYP. FOR 7 PI. ACES), .
MOU~NG HOLES , ~
TOP FL/C4G'ES ~ SC. ALE NONE ~ - 3S3 x 2 x 1/4
,OT~ '-~eT-e'jx '~wireless
1. THIS P~N IS ROTATEg EDOM THE COMPOUND PLAN, x ~ x 1/4 /--- 1...~3
2. 19' X 7' OPEN GRATING CANOPY ABOVE. m~ ----~ /~D SEAT ~c~F MINEOLJk,60 HIERRICKSNy 11501ROAD
~x,~,,,2x,x.,,~ (516) 294-1090
7 5/16" /~3 3/4" 3 3/4" ~ 4000 PSI DONCREI~ F00'I1N0
1 ~/4", , 2'-39/16".~_3/~',2'-39/l¢,~¥~',2'-39/~¢,9,7/~D',l'-U~/¢ ~/,." /~'-7 ~/A". 1/,¢ WS' L3 X 3 X 1/4- W/ SECTION
~'"%SECTION PPC MINI MOUNTING FRAMF
~,,~ cD.A , DETAIL I
~c~u, E-CE,, I. ~'-o",, G~AR[ ~. S-- .~ / S~, ,O,E "O ",',~
........ '%/ ,~v. ,4'x B 0~/1=/oo
' <~PIEIR
^6~ - SECTION
SCALE: NONE
2 1'-9' 1/2"
2'-2"
BILL OF MATERIALS
QUANTITY
FEEM~ DESCRIPTION (each)
~ 1-1/4-"¢ sch. 40 x lB" LG. MIN SS OR GALV. PIPE 1
{~) CHANNEL - C6 x 8.2 x 60" LG. GALV.(A-36) 1
(~) CHANNEL - C8 x 8.2 x 4-8" LC. GALV,(A-36) 1
t~} 5/8"¢ BOLT W/ DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND 4
WASHERS. GALV.
Q STD. U-BOLT FOR 2"¢ PIPE W/ DOUBLE HEX NUTS 2
AND WASHER, GALV. (SEE NOTE ~)
6'~8 ~/4" · EQUAL
PRE-~V~IZED 24' ~DE m,
3' SIDE ~. I ,
103012. PRO, DE ~
UNSPUCED ~S O~R ~ <
PCS MOUNTING HOLE LOCATIONS (E-CELL)
SEVEN CABINET LAYOUT (NS ~ ~) (~.)
~ SCALE: NO~
~SC~ NONE ~,~ SIDE FRONT
~PROVALS
NOTE: ~SPRINT
1, THE EL~ATION AND LOCATION OF THE CPS UNIT SHALL BE I. ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIN~ RF UNIT ANTENNA ELEVATIONPROJECT DAMAGER: DATE;
REPORT. (SUPPMED BY LUCE~)
2, THE OPS UNIT MOUNT IS DESIGNED TO F~TEN TO A ~ANDARD 1-1/4" DIAM~ER, SCHEDULE ~, V ~RIZON REP: DATE:_~
GALVANIZED STEEL OR ~NNLESS ~EEL PIPE, THE PIPE MUST NOT BE THR~DED AT THE UNIT ~NUFACTURER: DECIBEL PRODUCTS
~ THE PIPE SHALL BE CUT TO THE REQUIRED LENGTH (MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES) USING A
H~D OR ROT~Y PIPE CU~ER TO ~SURE A SMOOTH AND PERPENDICU~R CUT, A HACK SAW 1/4"
~ THE CUT PIPE END SHALL BE DEBURRED AND SMOO~ mN ORDER TO S~L ~(~. FOR 4) HEIGHT' 60,0"
WIDTH: 6.0"
3. THE MOUNTING P~TE SHA~ BE FABRICATED AS SHOWN AND A~ACHED TO ~E APPROPRIATE DOUBLE CHANNEL / / ~E P~ DEPTH: 2.75"
MOUNTING B~CK~ USING THE O~RSIZE U-BOLTS PROVIDED TO ALLOW A~US~ENT. IT
~Rm¢AL THAT THE Cps UNIT IS MOUNTED SUCH THAT IT IS WITHIN 2 DEGREES OF VERTICAL C~WELD CONNEC~ON ~ ~ ~PE
AND THE BASE OF THE UNIT IS WITHIN 2 DEGREES OF ~EL, AT PIPES AND ~ S~ ~:
1/4" ~LV, P~TE) / " ~/8 ¢ BOLT ERIOR Ue~IN~ R~RE
~ SOUTHOLD NY
~, FOR 41 t VZ' X V2' B~ RBUCER
z, _ ~(2) JVm', NOES FOR
GROUNDING KIT
gROUND BAN' LIGHTING MAST
MINIMUM BENBING ~IUS PER
60" (TRIM TO LENGTH) M~UFACTURER'S ~ANBARD
AWG gROUNDINg KIT O,B, SCHED.
[u '~ ~2 AWG BOW%
1" (PROVIDED WITH KIT) ~ ~O~~.) DETAILS
11~ ~- FiT .ONOPOLE.j 2 /8 7/8" O= ~APAY
~ ---~ ~ ~ ~OW ~ 2' TILT/~U~ TO ~2 SOUD, ~NNE~
~ x m m~ i MmeB
1/2~ 11/16~¢ HOrn FOR 5/8'¢ BOLT W~H %e~ L7/1~' x 7/8' sm~D H~ GPS UNIT MOUNTING BRACKET
~,,~ ,~ ~, w~,a~ ~.) " ' '/~'¢ "'"~ ELEVATION UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR
MOUNTING BRACK~ DETAIL A VIO~TION OF SECTION 7209
%s_5/s~: No.~ CANOPY DE~IL~ oF T~E NEW YO~ STATE
V RS. ~ ~ S~E 1/2 =f-O EDUCATION ~W.
I
BEAM
i0'-10'
~NE OF
~OVE
12" X 12~' X
BEAmN
(~ICAL FOR 6)
CONCRETE
PAD
BROOM
POUR DOOR PAD AFIER
INSTALLAllON AND FASTE]tIN8~
OF SHELLER
217 In, SLOPE
RLTER FABRIC. MIRAFI
OR APPRO~D EQUAL
~F
12'-4" 't
FOUNDATION PLAN
SCALE:
0
1. SEE DWG. S-2 FOR SHELTER LOCATION AND
ORIENTATION
STANDARD PANELS
WITH AGGREGATE ~
FINISH ALL AROUND ~.
~mF PORT~ ~
~¢. UNR' kO, UNII
7 ~/2"~
INTEGRAL
~ - DISOONNECT SWITCH
LEFT
RECEFq'ACLE
ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0"
EXHAUST LOLIV~R
X
RIGHT ELEVATION
S~ 1/4%1'-0"
GRADE BEAM
I0'-10'
VERIZON ANTENNA SCHEDULE
MECHANICAL
~ J ~ H~DHT ~ ~EED ~
ALPHA 1 102' 80' ABOVE GRADE (7 BOll'ON N. P9011
BETA 2 222' 80' ABOV~ GRADE O' BOl'rO~lALPS011
GAMMA 5 342' 80' ,I~]DVE GRADE 8' BOITOU N. Pgo11
BPS AT SHELLER ROOF - FURNISHED BY LUCENT
NOTES:
ANTENNAS LISTED MAY VARY, DEPENDING ON SYSTEM PERFORMANCE,
. ANTENNA HEIGHTS SHOWN ARE TO TOPS OF ANTICS.
GRADE B~M
~L SHEL~R
RLTER F/~RIC, MIR~ 500X
OR/~PBOVED EQUAL
~-) t~ coNT.
lOP &
BY COMPAGTED IN
SITU SOIL
STIRRUPS AT
FOUNDATION SECTION
SCALE,. 1/2'=I'-0'
HOOKED
BEARING
/- PLA'TE
PLATE DETAIL
SCALE: 1'=I'-0"
1. PROVLDE (6) BEARING PLATES.
VERIZON
(12 REQUIRED)
ANTENNA
ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/4'=f-0"
MANUFACTURER. SWEDCOM CORPORATION
MODEL: ALP-E 9011-DIN ENHANCED LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNA
HEIGHT: 43"
WIDTH' 6
DEPTH: 8"
WEIGHT (INCLUDING BRACKETS) 20 LBS
4" MUFFLER"~
~- EPDM FASCIA
UNIT
EXHAUST LOUVER
3'-3" X 3'-3"
FUEL
8" X
~DM
REAR ELEVATION
SC, N]~:
SECURllY VIEW HO~ (lh'P,)--~
UGNTING FIX'lURE
D
D
FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE 1/4"=1'-0"
STEEL NOTE8
INCORRECTLY FABRiDA~D, DAMAGED OR OTHERWISE MISFI'ffING OR NON-CONFORMING
MATERIALS OR CONDITIONS SHALL RE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMEDIAL
OR CORRECTIVE ACTION,
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL SHALL CONFORM
TO THE AME~CAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION "SPECIFICATION FOR THE DESIGN,
FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR BUILDINGS", LATEST EDITION
3. STRUCTURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM ABC,
"STRUCTURAL STEEL", LATEST EDITION, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
ALL PIPES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A5Ol OR A55 GRADE B (Fy=S5 ksi MIN) ASOO
GRADE B MAY BE USED IF A501 OR A5~ STEEL IS NOT AVAILABLE
5. ALL TUBES SHALL CONFORM fO ASTM A50O GRADE B (Fy=46 ksi).
6. ALL THREADED RODS SHALL BE A36, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
SHOP CONNECTIONS SHALL BE WELDED OR BOLTED. FIELD CONNECTIONS SHALL BE BOLTED
UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ALL BOLTED CONNEC~ONS SHALL BE MADE W~H HIGH
STRENGTH BOLTS
STRUCllJRAL CONNECTION BOLTS SHALL BE HIGH STRENBTH BOLTS AND, SHALL CONFORM
TO ASTM A325 "HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS FOR STRUCTURAL JOINTS, INCLUDING SUffARLE
NUTS AND PLAIN HARDENED WASHERS", LATEST EDITION, DOLTS SHALL BE 5/8" DIAMETER,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED NUTS SHALL BE HEAVY HEX, A LOCKING DEVICE SHALL BE
iNSTALLED ON ALL STEEL TO STEEL CONNECTIONS,
CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH AWS CODE FOR PROCEDURES, APPEARANCE, QUALI~ OF
WELDS AND FOR METHODS USED IN CORRECTIVE WELDING, ALL WELDERS AND WELDING
PROCESSES SHALL BE QUALIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS "STANDARD QDALIFICATION
PROCEDURES", ALL WELDS SHALL BE WITH E70 ELECTRODES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
lO UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL STEEL, BOLTS AND U-BOLTS SHALL BE HOT-DIP
BALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION CONFORMING ASTM A153.
11. TRIMMED ENDS OF STEEL AND DISTURBED SURFACES SHALL RECEIVE A COAT OF Z.R,C
COLD GALVANIZING COMPOUND AS MANUFACTURED BY Z.RC CHEMICAL PRODUCTS CO.,
QUINCY, MASS
12. ALL SPECIALTY ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN INSTRUCqONS.
15, ALL MASTS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS (WITHOUT SPLICE) AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED,
CONCRETE NOTES
CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN
CONCRETE INSTITUTE "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE
(ACl 318-95) AND COMMENTARY ACI 318R-95",
CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SHALL BE NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM
COMPRESSWE STRENGTH OF AO00 PSI AT 28 DAYS, SLUMP SHALL BE ¢ INCHES (±1 INCH).
AIR ENTRAINMENT SHALL BE 6%.
5. CONCRETE REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE GRADE 60 DEFORMED BARS AND SHALL CONFORM
TO ASTM SPECIFICATION A 615 WITH A MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH Fy=6B km. WELDED WIRE
FABRIC REINFORCEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A82 AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM
Fy:70 kSl,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER FOR REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE
AS FOLLOWS:
A) ~" FOR FOUNDATION BOTTOM BARS AND VERTICAL BARS
5 MINIMUM LAP SPLICES SHALL BE 40 BAR DIAMETERS.
6 CONCRETE INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER SPRINT AND VERIZON STANDARDS
FOUNDATION NOTE~
3
FOUNDATIONS SHALL BEAR ON UNDrSTURBED NATURAL SOIL OR COMPACTED STRUCTURAL
FILL HAVING A MINIMUM ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACll~ OF 1500 POUNDS PER SQUARE
FOOl,
CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY ALL NECESSARY MEASURES TO SAFEGUARD THE STRUCTURAL
INTEGRllY OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES DURING D<CAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF
FOUNDATIONS, SIDEWALL STABLI~ OF EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING
EXCAVATION. ANY UNUSUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGFFF TO
THE AIlENTION OF THE ENGINEER,
BO1TOM OF EXCAVATION SHALL BE CLEANED OF LOOSE MATERIAL AND WATER PRIOR TO
PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE DEWATERINO SHALL BE PERFORMED WITHOUT LOOSENING
OF THE SUBGRADE.
FOOTINGS AND SLABS SHALL BE PLACED ON FIRM, DRY AND NON-FROZEN SUB-GRADE.
SEE REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS FOR REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE
FOUNDATION DRAWINGS AND DETAILS.
SHELTER ANCHORING NOTES
THE EQUIPMENT SHELTER AND FOUNDATION INDICATED ARE BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED
BY NULLMAN INDUSTRIES, lNG, AVENEL, N.J. (908) 636-1500
2. INSTALL SHELTER IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S CURRENT PUBLISHED
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
3. REFER TO DRAWING S-2 FOR SHELTER LOCATION
4, INSTALL BEARING PLATES FURNISHED WITH SHELTER, WELD SHELTER TO BEARING pLATES
ELECTRODES SHALL BE ETOXX OR EGOXX,
UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR
ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS
A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209
OF THE NEW YORK STATE
EDUCATION LAW.
PETER E. PAPAY
N,Y. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO. 064690
PAPAY ENOINE£RINO & CONSTRUCTION, INC,
~00 HILLTOP ROAD, R/~SEY. N& 074~S
201-9~4-2828
Sprint Spectrum L.P'.
Crossroods Corporote Center
1 Internotionol Bird,, SEe, 800
Mohwoh, New Jersey 07~95
Phone: (201) 512-4700
Fox: (201) 512-4713
wireless
60 HERRICKS ROAD
MINEOLA, NY 11501
(516) 294-1090
F~OJECT NUMBER
11239
DNAWN BY
I J,D.P.
CHECKED BY
[ P.E,P.
NO
DATE 15~LIIE
0 07/12/00 APPROVAL
~PROVALS
PROJECT MANAQER:. DATE: I
SPRI~ REP:, DATE:
~RIZON REP: DATE:
MATTITUCK
S~E NUMBER:
NY55XC688/958283
ELIJAH'S LANE & RT
SOUTHOLD, NY
25
B~O~K & LOT:
DIST, 1000, SEC. 108
BLOCK &, LOT 11.
DETAILS
~IEET NUMBER
,¢
(s.a. 25)
BLOCK
sEcTION
DISTRICT
7
115
1000
1. LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF STRUCTURES ON lOTS OUTSIDE
OR PROPER~ IN QUESllON ARE APPROXILtA[.
<~KEY, MAP
SCALE. 1'--100'
GRAPHIC SCALE
( m l~mT )
I"~-,Jltrue
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN ,500'
UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR
ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS
A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209
OF THE NEW YORK STATE
EDUCATION LAW.
PEFER E.
PAPAY
3APAY ENGINEERING ~ CONSTRUCTION,
JNC,
--- Sprint
Sprint Spectrum L.P.
1 International Blvd., Ste. 800
Mohwoh, New Jersey 07¢95
Phone: (201) 512-4700
Fox: (201) 512-4713
~wireless
60 HERRICKS ROAD
~INEOLA, NY 11501
(516) 294-1090
PROJECT NUMBER
11239
I J.D.P.
CHII¢If~D my
I
I
I P.E.P.
NO
0
DATE ISSUE
07/12/00 APPROV~
APPROVALS
PROJECT MANAGER: DATE:
SPRINT REP: . DATE:
VERIZON REPI DATE:__
MATrlTUCK
NY33XC688A/958283
ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25
SOUTHOLD, NY
DIST. 1000, SEC. 108
BLOCK 4, LOT 11.3
KEY MAP
S A