The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-107.-4-2.1 . '.' ~:I . WOLF PIT ASSOCIATES RECEIVED BY SCUTHOlO TOWtl PLAi1NING BOARD AUG 2 E; 1987 P. O. Drawer A, Main Road DA.TE Jamesport, NY 11947 August 24, 1987 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As general partners for Wolf Pit Associates, we hereby withdraw our previous plan for a 27 lot subdivision of our 65+ acres at Mill Road and Mill Lane, Mattituck, New York. We also withdraw the Semer application for the set eff of 40,O~O square feet at right-of-way off Mill Lane, Mattituck, New York, also known as Iris Acres, which was approved by Y0ur Board in 1982. ~ We herewith submit our new plan for 13 five acre parcels. As the property has been previously field inspected we awalt a formal hearing before your Board to approve this sketch and declare the site of no environmental significance. '0 since~el..l'J; 1'~~7~,,-- I I I Ii / / A/ 'i\-L-,/ .... r, ~/ -7-. ...._.. _ ,'/ ,! ," ", ---.0'_ .--- '. --.... /" -- -'''-. David' J. "Sai';'nd! Luis San Andres General PartnerSI Wolf Pit Associates DJS:ml Encs. .~ j~ ~~~. ~f IIJ.Y \\" ~ E'\<0" ' 'f."'" ill - ,.0 _ '9\~G . :, . P. O. Drawer A, ~ain Road Jamesport, NY 11947 RECEiVED BY , " l'.iO "O'QTI SOU1HGLO i C . I ,f,i11.i..U U ~.i fJ.UG .~71987 " 1 ,~ August 13, 1987 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Wolf Pit Associates were extremely disnear~ened by your letter dated August 6, 1987, informing us that our f1,e acre proposal for the site was not accepted. It was at a scoping session held several months ago at Southold Town Hall, attended by Dave Emilita, Victor Lessard, several Town aides, Howard Young, David Saland and Luis San Andres, where we reviewed the environmental concerns of Wolf Pit Associates original 27 lot subdivision. The concerns reviewed (wetlands, set-backs, scenlC ~reservation, etc.) were reasonable and easily remedied; however, in a sincere effort to thoroughly satisfy the environmental concerns as well as to insure the scenic preservation of the entire area, Wolf Pit Associates offered a five acre concept for the subdivislion. For this extraordinary surrender of yield, Wolf Pit Associates requested that the Planning Board designate the site of no environmental significance (which it would be) and grant us a negative declaration (aborting the SEQRA ?rocess). 30th Mr. Emilita and Mr. Lessard felt that this was very possible. Therefore, we sincerely urge the ?lennlng Board to cecons1der the five acre plan not merely as an alternate to the existing 27 lot plan accompanying the Draft Envlronmental :mpact Statement but instead help us to preserve the aeauty ~nd charm of this exceptional area and accept the five acre plan with a negative declaration. We would appreciate an informal nearing on this matter as soon as it is conveniently possible. Thanking you, we cema~n, n:7ri~f~ / / /~A7Q David ;. 3ala~ L~ General ?artners, Wolf Pit Associates LSA:DJS:ml CC: Planning Board Members David Emilita Victor Lessard Valer.ie Scopaz Howard Young w'N-hclrU---v0 -PYQ)JJOUS?Lo.r: -La ~ d '3 ~ e PI yo~ _ ~ M ~~ cDcl-tI Q ecA--L CD~ L0Yvch 70 ~ Yl-0Q~Q... . . Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT MARCH 9, 1987 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, does hereby determine that theaction descriped below is Unlisted and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Proposal is for a subdivision of 64 acres into 27 residential lots with 28 acres of open space, in the cluster concept. This proposal t'o be known as "Wolf Pit Associates" is located at Mill Lane and 'Old Road, Mattituck, tax map no. 1000-107-4-2.1. REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION 1. This area has been nominated by the public as an area of "unusual local importance" to the Department of Environmental Conservation wetland regulatory maps. 2. There is concern about the potential impacts the development of this parcel may have about the wetland systems and the natural scenic character of the local parkland. 3. This area is of historic significance and contains an historic homesite (SPLIA records). Further information may be obtained by contacting Diane M. Schultze, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, 11971 Copies mailed to: Henry Williams, DEC Commissioner NYS, DEC at Stony Brook Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Southold Town Trustees Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor David J. Saland, General Partner "Wolf pit Associates" . 'OUNTY OF SUFFOLK . APR 21 19Si Michael A. LoGrande SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER April 17, 1987 Mr. David Emilita Southold Town Planning Department Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 HE: Wolf Pit Associates, Draft Environmental Impact Statement S.C.T.M. #1000-107-4-21 Dear Mr. Emilita: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received your memorandum of April 6, 1987, regarding the above- referenced application. The Health Department's principal environ- mental and sanitary code concerns regarding this project Were provided to the Town by correspondence dated February 6, 1987. If there have been no substantive changes to the application or subdi vision design since our original review, our conCerns remain the same. If there have been changes to the subdivision design, we would like the opportunity to evaluate them before the Town finalizes its scoping outline. A summary of our preliminary conCerns regarding the Wolf Pit Associates application include the following: 1. Protection of the tidal and freshwater wetlands; 2. Delineation of wetland boundaries; 3. Building envelopes and erosion control measures; 4. Protection of steep slopes and vegetation adjacent to Wolf Pit Lake; and 5. Protection of the scenic quality of Wolf Pit Lake parkland. COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAO. N.Y. 11901 3\1tH 4/~IB( Letter to David Emilita April 17, 1987 Page 2 . . . Thank you for keeping us apprised of the continuing review of this application. Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at your convenience. Sincerely, cY~~,(fP- - Louise W. Harrison Supervisor, Bureau of Environmental Management Office of Ecology LWH/amf . . WOLf n'i< *!JsOOr.... P. O. Drawer A, Main Road Jamesport, NY 11947 Southold Town Plannir.g B8ard Main Road Southo1d, NY 11971 Dear Sirs: July 20, 1987 Please find enclosed our check no. 166 in the amount of $1,500 which represeuts the SEQRA review fee for our ~roposed major subdivision at Mattituck. DJS:m1 Enc. - check ~1. J-LJ David J. Ja1and General Partner Wolf Pit Associates RECEIVED BY SOU1llOLD TOWN PlANNING 80ARD Jill.. ~ LlJ~ti' '.,j ~ eOUNTY OF SUFFOLK . '" ~ :'09ti1,. -" ~;.,' It' . '~~ ,,~;. . J~! ~- "- ....., -2..... }O.?~~'J~'> Michael A. LoGrande SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVIO HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER August 18, 1987 Dr. Frank Panek NYSDEC Bldg. #40 SUNY at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York 11794 RE: Southold Town freshwater wetlands Dear Frank: The Office of Ecology, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, has been reviewing applications for various subdivisions and other actions under SEQRA since January of this year. We understand that DEC is evaluating nominations of freshwater wetlands for mapping in the Town of Southold on parcels we also have inspected for SEQRA reviews. (Enclosed are copies of corre~pondence to the Town re9arding t h r. eeapP.li cat ion s : _l~~ t . " A,~SEJetat~!ir ..,.ond !Q:Mlu....; an. 8,a~rrJlI..5~V';l~. I thought your staff m~ght find the re~!l1ts of o~r field inspections and review helpful to arrival at mapping decisions for wetlandS on these properties. ~ Louise W. Harrison Supervisor, Bureau of Environmental Management Office of Ecology LWH/amf cc: Bennett Orlowski, Town of SoutholdV Encs. COUNTY CENTER ~IVERJolEAO. .....y. 11901 @~ . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK . ." Michael A. LoGrande SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE OEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER August 18, 1987 . Dr. Frank Panek NYSDEC Bldg. #40 SUNY at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York 11794 RE: Southold Town freshwater wetlands Dear Frank: The Office of Ecology, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, h~s been reviewing applications for various subdivisions and other actions under SEQRA since January of this year. We understand that DEC is evaluating nominations of freshwater wetlands for mapping in the Town of Southold on parcels we also have inspected for SEQRA reviews. (Enclosed are copies of correspondence to the Town regarding thr.ee. appl ications: Wolfpjt A~sociates; Raymond Kerester; and Bar r ~ S a v its. I ,)r I - LI - v I -"'I -, --~ -,- . 07 l,'-.", \. I thought yo!..!r staff IT!ight find the re~ult$ of Q'..!r field inspections and review helpful to arrival at mapping decisions for wetlandS on these properties. Sincerely, L) '- y~ Louise W. Harrison Supervisor, Bureau of Environmental Management Office of Ecology LWH/amf cc: Bennett Orlowski, Town of Southold.,! Encs. COUNTY CENTER ~IVERMEAO. N. Y. , , 90 1 @ru\) , . \ce~Y-~~\ nlt COPl WOLF PIT ASSOCIATES P. O. Drawer A, Main Road " .,VED BY .Jamesport, NY 11947 ~,rU,/i;'dilG BC,~H~ " . o;;i-198r-- August 13, 1987 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, :;Y 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Wolf Pit Associates were extremely disheartened by your letter dated August 6, 1987, lnforming us that our five acre proposal for the site was not accepted. It was at a scoping session held several months ago at Southold ~own Hall, attended by Dave Emilita, Victor Lessard, several Town aides, Howard Young, David Saland and Luis San Andres, wh0re we reviewed the envIronmental concerns of Wolf Pit Associates original 27 lot subdivision. The concerns reviewed (wetlands, set-backs, scenic preservation, etc.) were reasonable and easily remedied; however, in a sincere effort to thoroughly satisfy the environmental concerns as well as to insure the scenic preservaticn of the entire area, Wolf Pit Associates offered a five acre concept for the subdivisiion. For this extraordinary surrender of yield, Wolf Pit Associates requested chat the Planning Board designate the site of no environmental 3ignificance (which it would be) and grant us a negative declaration (aborting the SEQRA ?rocess). Both Mr. Emilita and ~c. :assard faIt ~hat this was very possible. Therefore, we sincerely urge the Planning Board to reconsider the five acre plan not merely as an alternate to the existing 27 lot plan accompanying the Draft EnvIronmental Impact Statem.nt but instead help ~s to preserve the beauty and cnarm of this exceptional area and accept the five acre plan with a negative declaration. We would ~ppreClate .10 informal soon as it lS convenlently possible. hearing on ~his matter as Thanking ~POUI we rerna~n, LSA:DJS:ml CC: Planning Board Members David 2milIta Victor ~essard ValerlE Scopaz ~ Howard Young ~ SinCere{''l'f / ~ i\.--/ r / . ~/- .~' --- - .1 _. _ DavIa u. ~a~L s ~an An res General ?artners, Wolf Pit Associates ~--l. . Town of Southold Trustees Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Wolf Pit Associates SCTM# 1000-107-4-21 Dear Boardmembers: . Southo1d. N. Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 December 2, 1987 Enclosed is a survey of the above mentioned subdivision, for your review. The Planning Board requests any input you may have with regard to this proposal. Very truly yours, B.lruxJJ:;i:. e~ On'90 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD cc: Conservation Advisory Council . . ~i[f:JIIa4~ ~-I:7:.C0 ~-~ # S~rfulk <" PU.Y~"'.I'.'..',".I '...'.'i....~.."..1x,:.:r .R"D CJ;::::,' I.i", , ::i'A T(t~'~ '~:b;:H; \D .~ V<: \~l) (I " ~ ~ S~~TY Southold, N. Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 August 6,1987 Mr..David Saland Saland Real Estate P.O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 Re: Wolf Pit Subdivision Proposed 5 acre alternative Dear Mr. Saland: The Planning Board has received your recently submitted alternateive proposal for the Wolf Pit Property. The proposal has been reveiwed informally by all but one of the Board members. We feel the proposal should be included in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement as a viable alternative. This letter should not be interpreted in any way as an approval of the proposal as shown on the sketch, but, simply as a statement that the 5 acre concept is an alternative which this Board is willing to consider in its review of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Very truly yours, JILJlYLttt O^-lavJ~tc\.I'~ ~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.,' CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD BO:VS:dms cc: David Emilita . . T Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 TO: Town Trustees Board of Appeals Building Department Landmark Preservation Committee Town Board SC Health Dept. NYS DEC FROM: David Emilita, Town Planner DATE: April 6, 1987 RE: Wolf Pit subdivision at Mattituck Draft Environmental Impact Statement You are potentially an involved agency, thus, we would like your comments on this above mentioned application, as it stands, to complete the Part Two and Part Three of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. Please supply your comments and/or whether you wish a scoping session to be held. There is no time clock running, however, we would appreciate a timely response. dms enc. ~ -La a..Ll!. c..0 / L.81~ <y. -T dt.c. j5~1~ Sr: I /Y>_ ... I I ZBA <.01 mCLf LPC. w! map .,.fY ~ rUC-(cl~ IV" HENRY P. SMITH, President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN . BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New Yark 11971 To: Southold Town Planning Board From: Town Trustees Re: Wolf Pit Associates Project Date: May 26, 1987 . WA~ ..~ ~ -, \~d TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 The Southold Town Trustees recommend to the Planning Board that construction should be kept above the 10' to 15' contour and that you restrictively covenant all elevations below 15' allowing foot paths, dock, ramp and float construction. ~~ rG# . . wOLEPI T ot::-) S ~ Sc~N6 SEGSI~_ ~fLl~ 67 - . NA'U~ -AffilJIm~ l~ ..])\UD f3.{IL!'T'A Ss2.LJaJJT~ 7~(~s!> ~u r.[) 3: Sf>,L(\ldJ fQP--'t>1U'\.. '722.. -'( ~1 0 0\e-\~SSq Sp; R.o ~^-\-",,-R.Jv' 765- - /9"38 . U~q rnQ"-/~O Planner 7&5--/958 ~L;)t",e.. J-es-"!.~~b ..s;:;I(t;,.C. R~M. 7f.,'!;-/ '80 ~ . L../OW/lrt.D vI ]OUfJb '1DUiUC, .. ~o ()N (", 727 -- 2303 k~T'c4v' ~~ ?1~N'6-< o??~-?5n .4arzt/~ ~tU~ 731-'-.\/73 -.----. l)~- Uk"eul"-jl~U ~afrLJfRtlo f'c~Ut-ure &,' -,-- f ~ ~ ~tJII . ~I1D~~~lll kw ~~rrof'a.1 1" SS. . 1~lA-f'rD~ea..rv\\~~ - DD(f-l-t~ wdz,it 1M. 'ca1Ld ~- 't fm, WL\\ ~it 3. ?~ l.UJJ pr'l.oY"" ~ \::C.o~~'lO"'A ~ R-~ veuuw~. II! . . 'vIoLr f?r -As~C. .9 Dg.&p f"~\jll:::>~ .a::>"11!!' Pr<0T'1&:-T1~ 1"!:;l.e, vJa,..p. 61'" LAiJ:.~ €!,'f ~TH~. ) ~~/lJG ol"'i!::N .sPAUr.~P~. \JF' -ro TH""ZS' COH.~r 'Or "7) e..:",-Q\ '-'4 e:NII~LQPES. - . lAJi'/ 15 '7 .' ( SEQR Positive Declaration Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Address: Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Project # (if any) Date: May 4, 1987 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 (and local law # ~h _ 44 if any) of the imple- menting regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environ- mental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below may have a signifi. cant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Title of Action: Wolf Pit Associates ,Major Subdivision @ Mattituck ( SEQR Status: Type I Unlisted IliJ o ref. 617.12(b) (10) Suffolk County Dev. Rights Description of Action: Proposed Subdivision of 64.5 + Acres into 27 building lots. Location: (Include the name of the county and town. A location map of appropriate scale is also recommended) See Attached Map. ~ (Attach additional pages as needed) C-14 ( ( ( . . SEQR Positive Declaration Page 2 Reasons Supporting This Determination: See Attached Parts II and III For Further Information: Contact Person: Address: Phone No.: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233-0001 Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation Office of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be princi- pally located Main office and appropriate regional office (if any) of lead agency Applicant (if any) All other involved agencies (if any) C-15 e-- -.----~ ------------- -- ~ ~ , ,/ N \ "- '0 V " 0 ::; CD , " ;\ s- z - () 0 >= w \ " .J U " 8 o u -' CIl ~ ~ ~ <l . . EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PART II Profect ImDacts and Their Haqr.1tude Gen!r41 Inf~~ati'~ i~~1~ Cdr!ful'y} . In CDmple~ing tr.e form t~~ reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations been relsor..ble! The reviewer 1s not expected to be an exoert environmental analyst. Idlntifying that Ir. Iffect will bl potlntially large (eolumn 2) does not meln that it s11nif1elnt. Ar.y large efflet MuSt bl evalultld fn PART 3 to determine signfficlnce. ef ect in column 2 limply alks that it be looked at further. is also necessar;ly By identifying In - The EXI~les provided Ire to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever poss;~le the thres"old of magn, ude that would trigger I responll in eolumn 2. The I.amplel are generllly Ipplfcable throughout thl State and for most situations. But, for Iny speciftc project Or site other examples and/or lower thresholdS may ~ more ap~ro.riate for a Potlntial Largl Implet rating. . Each project, on Ilch site. in elch Tocality, will vary. Therefore. the examples hive been offe~ed IS guidance. ThlY do not constltutl In I.haustive list of i..acts Ind threlholds to anlwer .ach nueltion. - Thl number of l.ampl.1 p.r question does not lndieltl the importlnee of Ileh question. INSTRUCTIONS (Rlad Carefully) a. Answer .Ieh of thl 18 questions in PART 2. Answer ill if thlre will be .!!!.l Ifflct. b. !!u1! anSwers Ihould be eonsid.red as ill Inswers. e. If answering VIS to a oueltion thIn ehlek thl a.proprlatl bo. (column 1 or 2) to indicate the ootlntial liz. of thl iODact. If i..aet threlhold equals or I.ettdl Iny I.ampll providld. cheek column 2. If lmpaet will oceur but threshold il lower than I..mple, eheck eolumn 1. d. If rlviewer hiS doubt about thl lizl of the lMplet t~en eonsider the imolet II ootent;ll1y llrge and Proceed to PART 3. . If I potent1ally largl i...et or Ifflet can b. reducld by a ehlnge in the oroject to I llss thin large ~9nitude. pla,e a Ves in column 3. A No reSDons. indicates. that such I reduction fs not DOssible. I. 1. WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT IS 1 RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHANGE T~ PROJECT SiTE? E..moles that Woulc 10Dl, to Column 2 NO Y[S 00 1_ 2.. 3. SHALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE MOOERATE LARGE REOUCED BY IMPACT I""ACT PROJECT CHANGE X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPACT ON LAND ...L Any =onstru't;o~ on Slopes of 151 or greater. {15 foot rise Der 100 foot of 1!"9tn}, er whert the genera' slooes in the project lrea exceed 10:. -1: Construction on land where the denth to the wlter tabl. is less thin 3 feet. N ronstruction of oftved Darkina areA ~~r l.~~~ or mnre vehicles. N Censtruction on la"~ where bedrock is eXQosed or Qenerally within 3 feet ~f ex1st~"g ground surface. -li ~ons:'ruct;C1~ tna., will continue for more than 1 ....ear" Or" involve mo~e than or.e ~~ase nr" stag.. 1J Exc~v~t;'" for" ~;"'"; ,urposes that would ~e~ve more than 'tOOO tons of nat:lraT "'3te~1.1 fi.e. rock or soil) per vear". -Ji Construction of any ~~ sanitary '.ndf111. .5- . ~ Construction in I designated 'looo..y. Oth.,. illpiCts: -.----- 2. -1f'J YES WILL YHERE IE All ErFtCT TIl ANY UNIOUE ~R UNUSUAL VNn mRl1S r:!\r'\ rOUNO ON YHE SITE? (f... elfff., dunes, ...1001eal fo....- \!:.Iv tions. .te.) $P'leciffc lInd fot'lftS: It'l'ACT ON WATER Nfl 3. WILL PROJECT ArFtCT ANY \lAm IODY DESIGNATED AS ..........0 PROTECTED? (Und.. Artlel.s 15, 24, 25 of tho Envtr- onmtntll Conservation Law. [.C.L.) N El.moles that Would 'oply to CoJunn 2 Dred91n~ II'Ore thin 1()f] cubic YlrdS of Mltt"fa1 '1"OIft chlnnel of I protected stream. ~ Construction in I designated freshwlt.r or tidal wetland. Other tlllplCts: Potential encroachment on tidal wetlands abutting Long Creek 4. WILL PROJECT AFFtCT ANY NON-PROTECTED EXISTINr. ~R NrH NO YES 10DY OF WATER? ....................................... .....0 E....I.s th.t Would Apply to Col... 2 ..lL A 10S increas, 0" decreue 1n the surface '"I of 1"1 body of ..t,l" Or' ..ore thin. 10 lere ""'''151 or decreasl. .Ji. Construction of . body of ..tel" thlt exceeds Tn Icres of sur'lce Irll. Other t....ets: PotentiaJ--i.'ti'.llii..~_~.!2l.!.__ti!- Lake !. "ILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR ~IlOIJtCD"ATER nUALITY? NO YES Ox EXlmo1es that Would Ap,ly t.o COlUMn 2 ~ Prnject wIll ~uire a disCharge pe~it. ..L Project requires use of , sourc! of ~.ter th,t doel not haye 'PDroy,l to serye ,rgPased prOject. Prgject requires wlter sUDPly froM wells with ~rt.ter thin ~S ~lllDns per minute ,umcing c'Plc1ty. ..lI.. -lL Construction or ooerltion c.using .ny contlMinltion of a Dublic water suoply system. ....ll. ....ll. P~ject will 'dversely 'ffect groundw.ter. L1QU1d effluent will be conveyed off the S1te to f,cilities which presently do not exist or hive 1nldeouate CIPIC1ty. N PrOJect rl"Ou1r;ng . flcn1ty t"'lt would :.1:01 wlter in excess of 2~.~OO g,Ilons ~er C.v. ~ Project ",,111 Hkell cluse SOtition or other dhchll1le 'nto In I"x15t1n9 cody 01 ""Iter to the e.tent thlt there will ~e ,n ~bvious visual contrlst to natural conc1tlO"S. .....- 1 x YES X - - x - x x . .nTE~TlAL LARGE ""A T x - 3. CAN "t'ACT BE REDUCED BY p~OJECT CHANG . "t"..~ I"-Dlets. -------- . 1. 2.. 3. ~'V.ll Tl' PnTE~TIAl r.AII IIIPACT BE f't?DEP.ATE LA~GE ~EDUCED 0' I~PAC'r ."'_CT P~~JECT CHAf'GE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X - - - X - - - - - - - ..L - - - - X - - - X - - - 6. :41ll PROJeCT AlTEA OIlAJIIA~r Fl!)l'. PATTE"5 OA SU~FAr.E flATER 110 YES ~uw.lFF? ................................................... OQ E....l. th.t ~Id A.p1, to Coluno 2 N Project wnuld 1~dt flood wltfr flows. ~ Project 11 likely to (lUI. substlntial INsioft. ~ Projlct is fnCOlflpltfbl. wftfl .rht1n9 drain,,. PltteP'ftl. y Oth,r 1..,IC11: Significant drainage impacts cou.ld occur. IHPA~ f)ff AfR III fES 7. Ulll PIDJECT AFFECT AIR OUALITY?..........................~ 0 F.....l.. that Would A"I, to COh.... 2 Project wtll l_duce 1,!l!lO or.... ftfIlcl. trtp. 1_ ""t_ hour. Project wt 11 rwsult 1_ tho t_cl..r.tlon of Ill.. tII.. 1 too ~, rwf'us. per hour. Project ~ssfon rite of .,1 COftt~f".ftts will ..eRed 5 lbs. De,. hour or . ,,"t source "PDdYCfng lID" thin 10 Million BruIt per hour. Oth.,. 1l1Ncts: IMPArT ON Pll,," ANn AN'''''I ~ e. Will PIDJECT AFFECT AllY MEATENED OIl ENOAll/lERED SPECIES? E....I.. th.t Would .,.1, to Col... 2 iIO fES 00 ...E Rftductfon of OM or IDN INcf.s Hsted on the ..... York or Federa' ltst. ustn, ~ site, 0.'" or near ,1tl or found on the Itte. almOYll of Inv DOrtton of I crittcal or siGnificlnt wild- Ii f. /I.b\yt.. AD"ltclt'lnn of Pesticide or "terbfci de oyer ""... thin t~'iC! 1 :o'ea~ oth.,. thin to#' ""'1 c.,.'tur" 1 purpous. ~t;'lII!r fr.ucts: Possible without verification along Long Creek p N .L 9. ~lll P~JECT SUBSTA:ITIAll' AFFECT P.ON-THREATE:IEO OR NO YES E~DAN~UEO SPECIES? .......................................0 <:) E..mol~ t~.t Would ADPly to Col~ Z rt'Qject would Substantially tntfrfere with an~ r'esil'ttnt or m1grltory f;s~ or wildlife sDec;,s. p p Project reQuires the ~vll of "Or, thin l~ acres of ~tur, f~rest {over lon ~t,r~ in ant) or other 10c!11v imDortlnt veget.tion. -7_ . !""^Ci C'; ':IS'.'-.l ~~S~~'RCL 1', l:II.I. TIolE ~DI)JrCT ur:c~ VHI/!. "ISlAS C~ T!IF I/fSIl4L CIoI.o.qACTER OF nlF. UFlGHB'lR!olI'll)O I'm co.....:n...? .........."... EX.:Imn1ts that l'ould A:>ply to Cohunn 2 An ~ncom~lt;ble yisu.1 .ffect clused by the 1ntro~uct;"" of new l'\Iter;.ls. colors InO(Q.r: {ams. in '''"trut to the surround;"" 1and5cl~e. on M1 .1 Lane y A orojlCt 11511:1 y;si~le. not II511y scrUMd.thu is Obv;ousl." different fr'Or.'l nth!!,., .round 1t. 6li Mill Lane ..:L Y Project will result in the f!111"1nIt10n or I'Iijor SCreening of lcenic views or vistls kn~~ to be tlllpOrtlnt to t~e '!'"ea. Otf'll.. ''''PIcts: . 1. 2.. 3 "ALL TO "CTENT IAl c.~:: H'PACT BE C'~ER.ATE L"GE REDUCED ~Y :wPO,Ci t"NC' PRI'lJECT C'!MiGE' ~ X - - - X - - - X - - - - - - - - - S - - - - - - X - - - - - - X - - - X - - - - - - ....ll. - - - - - - - - - - - - - ..~ YE 00 I~P~CT ON HI~TOqIC RESOURCES 11. WILL PROJECT I'WACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HIS~RIC. NO YE PRE-Il/~TO.IC OR PALEnrITor,ICAL II'l"JPTANCE? .................00 Ex.moles that ~uld ADolv tD ColUMn 2 P~iect occurina w~olly or ~rttllly withfn or conti9uous to Iny flCi1itv or sfte lfsted on the NlttO"ll Reaister of ~istoric ,llces. Any fmplct to In archeologicll site or fOSSil b~d located wft~fn the p~ject sfte. I)ther t""ICts: Potential impact on Summer hou,se without safeguards. I",ACT ON OPEN SPACE I RECREATIO~ 12. WILL THE PIlIlJECT AFFECT THE OUANTITY OR DUALITY OF EXISTlrlG NO Yr.S OR FUTURE OPErl SPACES OR RECRE.~TlONAL OPPORMITIES?...... 0 0 EXlmolts thlt Would Aoply to Colynn 2 Y Tl,t ptM"llnlnt fOl"tclosure of I future recre.tionll oooortunft~. Y A mljor ~duct;on of In open Spice f~ortlnt to t~e community. .....:J. Other f!nOlcts: Loss of Lana Creek Open Space Greenbelt continuity IM~.CT nN TRA~SPORTATrON 13. "ILL THERE BE M. EFFECT TO EXISTlllC TAANSPORTATlnN SYSTE"S? ............................................... [xlmol.s thlt Would A~~lv to Column 2 Alt.rlt10n of present ,atterns of nove~nt of "eoole Ind/or gOOdS. Project will result in severe traffic 'robl~s. Jther ;~OICts: ------._.~ -.. ---..--- - . .R. '<<l YES C)O . I~PACT ON ENERGY 14. Will PROJECT AFFECT THE ~NITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO YES ENERr,y SUPPLY? ................... ...................... "IX\O Exampl.s that Wpuld Apply to Cplumn 2 ~ Project c.using ore.t.. th.n 51 incre... tn .ny f.... .f .n..gy us.d In municlp.llty. Proj.ct requl.lng the cre.tlon .. .xt.nslon of .n .n.rgy t..nsmlssl.n .. supply system to s.rv. ..re th.n SO slnol. .. two f.mily resid.nc.s. Oth.. Imp.cts: IMPACT 011 NOISE IS. Will THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODORS. NOISE, GLARE, VIBRATION NO YES .. ElECTRiCAl OISTURIlA/lCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? .. "00 Ex.mpl.s th.t Would Apply to Col... 2 Bl.stlng within 1,500 feet .f . hospital, school o.oth.r s.nsltl.. f.clllty. Odo.s will .ccu. routin.ly (lOre th.n one hour per day). Proj.ct will oroduc. o....tlng. nols. .xceedlnn the l.c.l ambl.nt n.ls. 1...1. for nols. .utslde of structures. Proj.ct will remo.. n.tu..l b.r.l.rs th.t .auld .ct .s I noise screen. Oth.. Implcts: I,.ACT Of! H[At TH I HlIAIOS 16. Hill PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC IlEALTH AIlD SAFETY? Ex.mpl,s th.t Would 'pply to Col... 2 If! YFS ."........ ,,€) 0 Project will c.us, . .Isk .f ...1.sion o. rel..s. .f h.z.rdous substlnc.s (f... .il, p.stlcldns, chemicals. ..dl.tion, .tc.) in the event of accident or UDset conditions. or there will be I chronic low leyel discharge or enission. Project that will result In the bu.ill .f "h.z.rd.us waStlS" (f.,. toxic. pnfsonous. highly reactive. radioactive. irritlting. infectious. etc.. fnclud1nQ wlstes that Ire solid. SeMi-solid, liquid or contain glses.) St..... f.cflltl.s f.. .n, mlllf.n .. mo., ..11nns .f 11.ulfl.d natura' gas or other liauids. . t)ther ;moICts: -!'- . '1 2. => S'1AI.l TO POTENTI.'l CAli IMPACT CE MQOE~TE lA~GE REDUCED BY I~PACT I'IPACT PROJECT C~.ANGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - . " I~PACT Or! GR.OIITH AND CH.AR.ACT~R OF COHr1UNITY OR rIElG","nRIoIOntl 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHAPACTED ^F THE EXISTING ~ YES :::~~T::I:' ~:;~.~~~;~.:~.~~;~.~..................... "00 The population of the Cfty. Town or Village in wftieh the proj.ct 1. loclt.d t. lik.ly to prow by lOr. thin 5S of resident hymen population. Th. municipal budgets for capital expenditures or opera. t1ng services will incr.ase by IDrt thin 51 per year II . result of thts project. Wil, involve Iny ~rman."t facility of . non-agricultural use in In agricultural district or remov, "rime agricultura' llnds from cultivation. The project will replace or .'iMinat. existing 'lc11fttIS. structures Or areas of historic iMpOrtanc, to the community. Development will induce In influx of . particular Ige group with special nl'ds. Project will set In important precedent fOr future proiects. Project will relocate 15 or ~re ~loyees in one or ~re bus i nISS.S. Other i InDictS: 18. NO YES .......00 IS THERE PUBLIC CONTRCYFRSY CONCERNING THE PInJECT? E....l.. that Would Apply to Col... 2 Either government or citizens of .djacl~t communities hlv, expressed ODPosition or rejected the protect or hlv, not been contacted. Objections to t~e nroject from within the c~nity. . JS/1ALL Tn POmmAL c;~O~~~~C~Y~ ~:iDERm . LARr.E IrPACT IItP.CT PROJECT CHANGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IF ^"Y ACTION IN PART 2 IS IDENTIFIED AS A P'lTEHTIAL LARGE IMPACT on IF YOU CANNOT DETEAlUNE THE IlAGNI1\/DE OF IMPACT. PROCEED TO PART 3. PORTlDNS DF EAF COMPLETED FOR THIS PlIOJECT: PART 1.3-. PART II ~ MRT 3 ~ DETEIl'1INATlON Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1. 2 and 3) and cansiderinq both the maanitude and imnortlnce of elch iMPlct. it is rwasonlbly detf~ined that: A. The project will result in no mtjor tmoacts and. therefore. is one which mly not Cluse significlnt d.meoe to th* environment. B. Althou9h the ~raject could hive I significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant *ffect in this case because the mitigation measures described 1n PART 3 hive been included IS pArt of the oraposed project. . C. OIL" PREPARE A NEr-ATIVE OECLARATION o PREPARE A NEr~TlvE nECLARATION o PREPARE PO~TIVE ~RATIO" PROCEEO WITH EIS Sumawe- of ~.sDonsible Off'C;,1 ," L.ud . "gencv ~"t or ty~e "'~, of responSible offlC1,1 in Ltld Agencv . . E~F EIIVIROIIHENTAL ASSESSI1ENT . PART II J EVALUATIO~I OF THE IHPORTA~CE OF IMPACTS 1~'FORHATIOI' - Plrt 3 is prePlrod if ono or moro implct or offoct 1s considorod to bl 00tontill1y llroo. The amount of wr1t1n~ nlcessary to answer Part 3 Mly b-. determined by Inswering the Question: In briefly Comolotlng tho Instructions bolow hlvo I pllcod In this rocord .ufficlont lnfo...tion to indiclto tho reason.bleness of my decisions? INSTRUCTIONS Comploto tho followinq for olch lmplct or offoct ldontlfl.d in Col... 2 Of Plrt 2: 1. Bri.fly d.scrib. tho 1~lct. 2. )escrlbe (If Ipol1clbl.) how the lmplct might b. mltlglt.d or reduced to . I.ss thin llrp. 1on.ct by I pro- j.ct c~lng.. 3. AI..d on the 1nfo...tlon Iv.11.bl., decld. if It Is r..sonl~l. to conclud. thlt this 1~lct 1. 1MpOrtlnt to the mlnlClOlllty (City, town or Yllllg.) 1ft which the project 1. loclted. To Inswer the question of 1mportlnce, consider: The oroblbl11ty of tho lmplct or .ff.ct OCcurrlnq - Th. durlt10n of the implct or effect - Its irrev'Mlbll1ty, Including "'...non1l, lost resourc.. or vllues - Whether the lMPlct or .ffect cln b. controlled - Th. reg10nll con..quenc. of the Impact or .ffoct . Its oot.ntll1 div.rgenc. from 10cII n..ds Ind gools - Wh.th.r known obj.ctlon. to th.'proj.ct I~oly to this l...ct or .ffect. DETERI'INATI~N OF SI~llFICA~CE An Ictlon Is consld.red to b. slgniflclnt 1f: no. (or lIIllre) lmolct 15 det....in.d to both bm. Ind its (th.l r) consoo...c., ....od on the review .bove, is fmoortlnt. PAPT III STATEHE~TS (Contlnu. on Attlchments, IS ne.ded) -11. r . . WOLF PIT PART III APRIL 21, 1987 1. PHYSICAL CHANGE Significant potential for erosion and sedimentation into Long Creek exists if any of the slope below the 20 foot contour and/or wooded area sloping to Long Creek is disturbed. Likewise, land below the 25 foot contour at Wolfpit Lake should remain undisturbed. 3. WETLANDS To avoid any disturbance to this pristine wetlands, no docking or boating should be permitted this far up Long Creek in addition to nc disturbance to vegetation. 6. DRAINAGE Wolfpit Lake already suffers from adverse drainage impacts. Non-disturbance of the sbpes around it is needed to prevent additional impacts. The swale leading to Long Creek needs protection against disturbance to avoid adverse impacts to Long Creek. 8. & 9. WILDLIFE A complete inventory of flora and fauna and habitat is necessary to verify non-significant impact on rare, threatened, or endangered species. 10. VIEWS Development proposed on Mill Lane blocks significant views to and from the site. Development can be strategically placed with more flexible treatment of lot sizes and dwelling types to ensure visual integrity. 11. HISTORIC RESOURCE TheSemmer house on the property is a locally significant structure worthy of preservation. 12. OPEN SPACE The Southold Master Plan recommends an open space greenbelt along Long Creek. As proposed, Lots 14 - 17 preclude extending that Greenbelt. These lots need to be pulled back from Long Creek via a protective easement. . . APR 27 1987 WOLF PIT ASSOCIATES P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 April 22, 1987 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 ATTN: Diane Schultz Dear Diane: Please find enclosed four prints of the standard subdivision map for Wolf Pit Associates at Mattituck. We understand that these maps will be used to complete Part III of the Environmental Assessment Form and then a scoping session will be scheduled to discuss the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. If any further information is needed, please don't hesitate to contact me at 722-4990. r:Vt~lh ~J. Saland General Partner DJS:ml CC: Sebastian J. Navarra, Esq. -, r " ( ( l . . Introduction The following checklist of topics is intended as a starting point for developing a detailed scope for a project.specific Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Typically, no one project will require a discussion of all the topic areas contained in this document. Through the scoping process. this list of topics should be refined to reflect issues unique to the proposed project. Topic areas may be deleted. added. or elaborated upon. to arrive at the final scoping document. The purpose of the checklist format is to identify the basic topic areas for the Draft EIS. This is accomplished by reviewing the list and placing a check in the box located to the left of those topics which should be discussed. The model scoping checklist can also be used as a worksheet. including comments, suggestions and identification of the particular example(s) that are relevant to a detailed discussion of the topic or issue that has been check. ed. Conversely. those topics which are not checked, are issues not associated with the project. and may be eliminated from discussion in the Draft EIS. Minimum requirements for any Draft EIS are already checked for convenience. The next step is to expand the list to include or elaborate on those topics unique to the proposed project. A blank sheet is included at the end of the checklist for such additional information. The seoping process involves several steps in addition to compiling a list of topics. Scoping also includes discussiors on the quantity and quality of information required and the methods for obtaining that data. NOTE: This checklist was designed to be used in conjunction with the section on seoping con. tained in the SEQR Guideline.Draft and Final EIS's. It is also important to emphasize that this checklist should serve only as a model to assist in the scoping of a Draft EIS. It should not be used as a substitute for actively scoping a Draft EIS for a specific pro. jel:t. I. Cover Sheet All EIS's (Draft or Final) shall begin with a cover sheet that indicates: A. Whether it is a draft or final statement B. Name or other descriptive title of the project C. Location (county and town. village or city) of the project D. Name and address of the lead agency which required preparation of the statement and the name and telephone number of a person at the agency to be contacted for further in. formation E. Name and address of the preparers of any portion of the statement and a contact name and telephone number F. Date of acceptance of the Draft EIS G. In the case of a Draft EIS. the deadline date by which comments are due should be in. dicated II. Table of Contents and Summary A table of contents and a brief summary are reo quired for Draft and Final EIS's exceeding 10 pages in length. Howev..'., one should include these features in any size EIS to provide the review agency with easy reference to EIS topics. The summary should include: A. Brief description of the action B. Significant. beneficial and adverse impacts. (issues of controversy must be specified) C. Mitigation measures proposed D. Alternatives considered E. Matters to be decided (permits. approvals. funding) III. Description of the Proposed Action Place a check in the box to the left of those topics to be included in the draft EIS. o A. PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED I. Background and history 2. Public need for the project. and municipality objectives based on adopted community development plans . 3. Objectives of the project sponsor C.I o B. LOCATION 1. Establish geographic boundaries of the project (use of regional and local scale maps is recommended) 2. Description of access to site 3. Description of existing zoning of propos. ed site 4. Other: o C. DESIGN AND LAYOUT I. Total site area a.) proposed impervious surface area (roofs. parking lots. roads) b.) amount of land to be cleared c.) open space 2. Structures a.) gross leaseable area (GLA). if ap. plicable b.) layout of buildings (attached. enclos. ed, separate) c.) site plans and profile views 3. Parking a.) pavement area b.) number of spaces and layout 4. Other: o D. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION 1. Construction a.) total construction period anticipated b.) schedule of construction c.) future potential development. on site or on adjoining properties d.)other: 2. Operation a.) type of operation b.) schedule of operation c.) other: o E. CLOSURE AND POST CLOSURE PLANS (for projects of planned limited life such as landfills) o F. APPROVALS 1. Required changes or variances to the zon. ing regulations 2. Other permit approval or funding reo quirements IV. Environmental Setting Place a check in the box to the left of those topics to be included in the Draft EIS. .,_ C.2 I Natural Resources o A. GEOLOGY o I. Subsurface a.) composition and thickness of subsurface material examples: -depth to. and nature of. bed. rock formations and imperme. able layers -occurrence of an extractive mineral resource -usefulness as construction material b.) earthquake potential o 2. Surface a.) list of soil types b.) discussion of soil characteristics examples: -physical properties (indication of soils hydrological (infiltra. tion) capabilities) -engineering properties (soil bearing capacity) c.) distribution of soil types at pro. ject site d.) suitability for use examples: -agriculture -recreation -construction -mining e.) other: o 3. Topography a.) description of topography at pro. ject site examples: -slopes -prominent or unique features b.) description of topography of sur. rounding area o B. WATER RESOURCES o 1. Groundwater a.) location and description aquifers and recharge areas examples: -depth to water table -seasonal variation -quality -quantity -flow ( of L ~ ( ( ( . '. b.) identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater examples: -location of existin!,! wells -public/private water supply -industrial uses -agricultural uses o 2. Surface water a.) location and description of sur- face waters located on project site or those that may be in- fluenced by the project examples: -seasonal variation -quality -classification according to New York State Department of Health b.) identification of uses and level of use of all surface waters examples: -public/private water supply -industrial uses .-agricultural uses -recreation c.) description of existing drainage areas, patterns and channels d.)discussion of potential for flooding, siltation, erosion and eutrophication of water sources o C. AIR RESOURCES o ]. Climate a.) discussion of seasonal variations and extremes examples: -temperature -humidity -precipitation -wind o 2. Air quality a.) description of existing air quality levels examples: -list the National and State Air Quality Standards for the pro- ject area and the compliance status for each standard b.) identification of existing sources or pollutants-fixed or mobile c.) identification of any sensitive receptors in project area examples: -hospitals. schools. nursing homes, parks d.) description of existing monitor. ing program (if applicable) o D. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY o 1. Vegetation . a.) list vegetation types on the pro- ject site and within the surround- ing area b.) discussion of site vegetation characteristics examples: -species present and abundance -age -size -distribution -dominance -community types -unique. rare and endangered species -value as habitat for wildlife -productivity o 2. Fish and Wildlife a.) list of fish and wildlife species on the project site and within sur- rounding area. including migratory and resident species b.) di'~ussion of fish and wildlife population characteristics examples: . -species present and abundance -distribution -dominance -unique, rare and endangered species -productivity o 3. Wetlands a.) list wetland areas within or con- tiguous to the project site b.) discuss wetland characteristics examples: -acreage -vegetative cover -classification -benefits of wetland such as flood and erosion control. recreation C.3 . . Human Resources. o A. TRANSPORTATION o 1. Transportation services a.) description of the size, capacity and condition of services examples: -roads, canals, railroads, bridges -parking facilities -traffic control b.) description of current level of use of services examples: -a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic flow -vehicle mix -sources of existing traffic volume o 2. Public transportation a.) description of the current availability of service b.) description of present level of use o 3. Pedestrian environment o 4. Other: o B. LAND USE AND ZONING o 1. Existing land use and zoning a.) description of the existing land use of the project site and the surrounding area examples: -commercial -residential -agricultural -business -retail -industrial -vacant b.) description of the existing zoning of site and surrounding area o 2. land use plans a.) description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area b.) discussion of future development trends or pressures o 3. Other: . o C. COMMUNITY SERVICES (for this section in. c1ude a list of existing facilities and a discus. sion of existing levels of usage and pro. jected future needs) o 1. Educational facilities o 2. Police protection o 3. Fire protection o 4. Health care facilities o 5. Social services o 6. Recreational facilities o 7. Utilities o 8. Other: o D. DEMOGRAPHY o 1. Population characteristics a.) discussion of the existing popula- tion parameters examples: -distribution -density -household size and composi. tion b.) discussion of projections for population growth o 2. Other: I o E. CULTURAL RESOURCES o 1. Visual resources a.) description of the physical character of the community example: -urban vs. rural b.) description of natural areas of significant scenic value c.) identification of structures of significant architectural design o 2. Historic and archaeological resources a.) location and description of historic areas or structures listed on State or National Register or designated by the community b.) identification of sites having potential significant ar- chaeological value , ,. ~ C-4 . . (' D 3. Noise a.) identification of existing level of noise in the community b. identification of major sources of noise examples: -airports -major highways - industrial/commercial facili- ties D 4. Other: ( V. Significant Environmental Impacts Identify those aspects of the environmental set. ting in Section !V that may be adversely or beneficially affected by the proposed action and re- quire discussion. VI. Mitigation Measures to MInimize Environmen- tal Impact Describe measures to reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts identified in Section V. The follow- ing is a brief listing of typical measures used for some of the major areas of impact. l Natural Resources D A. GEOLOGY 1. Subsurface a.) use excavated material for land reclamation b.) use facility wastes (ash, sludge) for land reclamation c.) other: 2. Surface a.) use topsoil stockpiled during construction for restoration and landscaping b.) minimize disturbance of non. construction sites c.) design and implement soil ero- sion control plan d.) other: 3. Topography a.) avoid construction on areas of steep slope b.) design adequate soil erosion devices to protect areas of steep slope c.) other: D B. WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater a.) design adequate system of treat. ment for stormwater runoff prior to recharge of groundwater b.) maintain permeable areas on the site c.) institute a program for monitor. ing water quality in adjacent wells d.) other: 2. Surface water a.) ensure use of soil erosion control techniques during construction and operation to avoid siltation examples: -hay bales -temporary restoration of vegetation to disturbed areas -landscaping b.) design adequate stormwater con- trol system c.) restrict use of salt or sand for road and parking area snow removal d.) avoid direct discharges to surface water resources e.) other: D C. AIR RESOURCES 1. Air quality a.) assure proper construction prac- tices examples: -fugitive dust control -proper operation and maintenance of construction equipment b.) design traffic improvements to reduce congestion and vehicle delay c.) install and ensure the proper operation of emission control devices d.) initiate a program for monitoring of air quality e.) other: C-5 . . o D. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUA TIC ECOLOGY 0 B. 1. Vegetation a.) restrict clearing to only those areas necessary b.) preserve part of site as a natural area c.) after construction. landscape site with naturally occurring vegeta. tion d.) purchase open space at another 0 C. location and dedicate to local government or conservation organization e.) other: 2. Fish and Wildlife a.) provide adequate habitat (shelter and food) for remaining wildlife species b.) schedule construction to avoid sensitive periods of fish and wildlife life cycles c.) other: Human Resources o A. TRANSPORTATION 1. Transportation services a.) design adequate and safe access to project site to handle pro- jected traffic flow b.) install adequate traffic control devices c.) optimize use of parking areas d.) encourage car pooling and opera- 0 k D. tion of facility during non. pea traffic times e.) design special routing and restricted hours for delivery truck traffic f.) other: . 2. Public transportation a.) adjust public transportation routes and schedules to service the facility b.) encourage use of public transpor. tat ion by using incentive pro. grams for employees or by sell. ing tickets in facility c.) other: . LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Existing land use and zoning a.) design project to comply with ex. isting land use plans b.) design functional and visually ap. pealing facility to set standard and precedent for future surrounding land use c.) other: COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. Police protection a.) minimize local police protection responsibilities by providing private security force b.) provide security systems, alarms for facility c.) provide equipment. funds or ser. vices directiy to the community d.) other: 2. Fire protection a.) use construction materials that minimize fire hazards b.) incorporate sprinkler and alarm systems into building design c.) provide equipment. funds or ser. vices directly to the community d.) other: 3. Utilities a.) install utility services undergrotmd b.) incorporate water saving fixtures into fadlity design c.) incorporate energy.saving measures into facility design d.) other: CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual resources a.) design exterior of structure to physically blend with existing surroundings b.) minimize- visual impact through thoughtful and innovative design of lighting and signs (consider: height, size, intensity. glare and hours of lighting operation) c.) design landscaping to be visually pleasing and to serve as a buffer between surrounding land uses. parking areas. operational equip. ment and facilities d.) other: . L \. C.6 .. . . ( ( 2. Historic and archaeologic resources a.)allow historical and ar- chaeological officials access to the project site during excavation b.) devote space within project site to a display of historical and ar. chaeological artifacts of local in. terest c.) preserve architecturally signifi. cant structures and make a photographic and statistical record of those that must be destroyed d.) other: 3. Noise a.) schedule construction/operation to occur during "normal business" hours minimizing noise impact during sensitive times (early morning, night) b.) assure adherence to construction noise standards c.) design berms and landscaping to . block and absorb noise d.) other: VII. Adverse Environmental Effects that Cannot be Avoided if the Project is Implemented Identify those adverse environmental effects in Section V that can be expected to occur regardless of the mitigation measures considered in Section VI. l VIII. Alternatives This section contains categories of alternatives with examples. Discussion of each alternative should be at a level suffiCient to permit a com. parative assessment of costs, benefits and en- vironmental risks for each alternative. It is not ac. ceptable to make simple assertions that a particular alternative is or is not feasible. Identify those categories of alternatives which should be included in the EIS by placing a check in the box located to the left.of the topic. o A. ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES 1. Site layout a.) density and location of structures b.) location of access routes, park. ing and utility routes 2. Orientation a.) compatibility with slope and drainage patterns b.)site size and setback re- quirements 3. Technology a.) pollution control equipment b.)innovative vs. proven technologies 4. Mix of activities a.) addition of businesses which would affect the operational nature of the facility . DESIGN AN.D o B. ALTERNATIVE SITES 1. Limiting factors a.) availability of land b.) suitability of alternate site to ac. comodate design requirements c.) availability of utilities d.) suitable market area e.) compatibility with local zoning and master plan f.) compatibility with regional ob. jectives g.) accessibility of site to vansporta. tion routes and the service population o C. ALTERNATIVE SIZE 1. Increase or decrease project size to minimize possible impacts 2. Increase or decrease project size to correspond to market and com- munity needs o D. ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION/OPERA.' TION SCHEDULING t. Commence construction at a dif. ferent time 2. Phase construction/operation 3. Restrict construction/operation work schedule C.7 . . o E. ALTERNATIVE LAND USE 1. Suitability of site for other uses a.) other types of commercial uses b.) other types of industry c.) different types of housing d.) other: 2. Public vs. private use o F. NO ACTION 1. Impacts of no action a.) effect on public need b.) effect on private developers' need c.) beneficial or adverse en. vironmental impacts o G. OTHER: IX. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources Identify those natural and human resources listed in Section IV that will be consumed. converted or made unavailable for future use. X. Growth Inducing Aspects Describe in this section the potential growth aspects the proposed project may have. Listed below are examples of topics that are typically af- fected by the growth induced by a project. o A. POPULATION 1. Increases in business and resident population due to the creation or relocation of business 2. Increases in resident population due to the construction of housing o B. SUPPORT FACILITIES 1. Businesses created to serve the in- creased population 2. Service industries created to supply new facility o C. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 1. Introduction or. improvement of in- frastructure (roads. waste disposal. sewers, water) to service proposed project 2. Creation of further growth potential by construction of improved in- frastructure o D. OTHER: XI. Effects on the Use and Conservation of Energy Resources Identify the energy sources to be used. an- ticipated levels of consumption and ways to reduce energy consumption. The examples listed below are typical issues to be considered when addressing this topic. o A. PROPOSED ENERGY SOURCES AND ALTERNATIVES o B. ANTICIPATED SHORT-TERM/LONG.TERM LEVELS OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION o C. INDIRECT EFFECTS ON ENERGY CON. SUMPTION 1. Increased dependence on automobile use 2. Increased levels of traffic due to pro. posed project o D. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES 1. Design methods to reduce fuel use for heating. cooling, and lighting a.) conventional technology examples: -insulation -thermopane windows -use of low wattage lights b.) innovative technology examples: -heat pumps -sol=,-panels -wind energy -use of waste heat from an in. dustria! plant c.) efficient layout examples: -orientation of structures in relation to summer and winter sunlight -clustering of structures to maximize common walls -shortening of utility runs -shared insulation and heating 2. Indirect energy benefits a.) location and design of facility to accomodate mass transit b.) use of shuttle buses c.) location of facility to minimize travei distance o E. OTHER: C-8 ( ( l , . . . XII. Appendices Following is a list of materials typically used in support of the EIS. A. List of underlying studies. reports and infor. mation considered and relied on in preparing state- ment B. List all federal. state, regional. or local agen- cies. organizations. consultants and private persons consulted in preparing the statement C. Technical exhibits (if any) at a legible scale D. Relevant correspondence regarding the pro. jects may be included (required in the Final EIS) Additional Draft EIS Scoplng Topics Indicate any additional topics for discussion in the Draft EIS. Attach additional sheets if necessary. C-9 ---I . . ~^r\\f 1519a1 . .......... I SEQR Positive Declaration Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Address: Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Project # (if any) Date: May 4, 1987 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 (and local law # '"'" _ 44 if any) of the imple- menting regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environ- mental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below may have a signifi- cant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Title of Action: Wolf Pit Associates,Major Subdivision @ Mattituck ( SEQR Status: Type I Unlisted Ii] o ref. 617.12 (b) (10) Suffolk County Dev. Rights Description of Action: Proposed Subdivision of 64.5 + Acres into 27 building lots. Location: (Include the name of the county and. town. A location map of appropriate scale is also recommended) See Attached Map. L "-' (Attach additional pages as needed) . C-14 ( ( ( r . . SEQR Positive Declaration Reasons Supporting This Determination: See Attached Parts II and III For Further Information: Contact Person: Address: Phone No.: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Page 2 Commissioner.Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233-0001 Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation Office of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be princi. pally located Main office and appropriate regional office (if any) of lead agency Applicant (if any) All other involved agencies (if any) C.i5 ~- . . ------------ ,/ N 0.. .0 .. 0 \ ::;; '" <::t- " , z - o .. ;\ ~ - w !q oJ u" . 0<> -.J '" ~ t) - '. ~ <,. . . EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART II Prciee! JmD~cts and Their MaQr.itude Gen~ral tnf~!"'":l!~;')~ "~fl'!r.! C!.\r!ful1y) In comple;ing tr.e form t~~ reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations been reasor.aoTt? The reviewer 1s not Ixpected to be an exoert environm-.ntal analyst. Identifying that Ir. effect will be potentillly large (column 2) does not meln thlt it S1~n1f1ca~t. Ar.y t.rgp effect must be evaluated 1n PART 3 to dete~;"e significance. ef ect ,n column 2 s1MOly Isks that it be looked It further. is also necessari11 Ry ;dentifyi~9 In - The Exa~les provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and whertver poss;~le the threshol, of magnl ade that would trigger. response in column 2. The examples Ire generally aDol1cable throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may ~e more IPoroprilte for I Potent 111 Llrge Implct rlt1ng. ~ Each project. on lach site. in each locality. will vary. Therefore. the examples have been offered IS guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each nuest10n. - The number of examples per question does not 1nd1clte the importlnce of elch question. INSTRUCTIONS (Reid Clrefully) I. Answer elch of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer!!! if there will oe ~ effect. b. Maybe answers should be considered IS ~ Inswers. c. If Inswer1ng Yes to I ouestion then check the Ippropr1lte box (column 1 or 21 to indiClte the ootenttll size of the imolct. if implct threshold equlls or e.ceeds Iny e,"mple provided, check column 2. If 1mplct will occur but threshold is lower thin e,"mple, check column 1. If reyiewer hiS doubt Ibout the stze of the 1mplct t~en consider the 1molct IS ootentillly llrge Ind proceed to PART 3. . d. e. If I ootent1111y llrge mlgnitude. pl.,. a Yes 1mplct or effect Cln be reduced by I chlnge in the oroject to I less thin llrge in cohl':'ln 3. A No response indicates' that such I reduction is not possible. 1 2. 3 NO yeS 00 , SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT 8E HOOERATE LARGE REOUCEO BY IMPACT I/'PACT PROJECT CHANGE - X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPACT ON LANO 1. WILL THERE BE AN EFFECr AS . RE~ULT OF A PHYSICAl CHAUGE TO PROJECT SiTE? Examoles that Wou1d A~D11 to Column 2 y Any co~stru~t~o~ on slopes of 15% or greater. (15 foot rise Der 100 foot of lenat~}. cr ~here the aeneral slooes ;n the project Ire. exceed 10:: . p Construction on land where the denth to the water table is less than 3 feet. N ~on5truction cf D~Yed D.rkinQ area ~nrl.~~~ or mnre vehicles. N Censtruct;on on 11"~ where bedrock ;5 ex~osed or Qenerally within J feet ~f exist~ng ground surface. -B. ~ons:ruc':;~": '1:1'11. will continue for more thlH' 1 veal'" or involve more ~ha~ vr.e ~~ase ~r !tage. IJ E,~~v!ti~n ~or ~'r.;"g ,urposes that would ~e~ve ~re than 1.000 tens of r.at~ral ~~ter;al (i.e. rOCk or 50;1) ~er Year. ~ Construction of Jny ~ew s.n;tl~Y la"df~11. -5. . ~ Construction in . designated 11006-'1. Othe,. impacts: 2. ~ YES WILL THERE BE AN Em:CT T1l ANY UNIOUt ~R UNUSUAL VNO FIlAllS ~ FOUND ON THE SITE? (t... elt,,), dun,s. aeoloQ1c.' 'O~- ~ Uons. ote.) . S"'ec;ftc lano forms: I~PACT ON WATER Hl'I YES 3. WilL PROJECT AFFECT ANY \lAm BODY DESIGHATEO AS ...0......0 X PROTECTED? (Undor Artiel.. IS, 24, 25 of tho Envir- onmental Cons.rvation La., [.C.L.) (1lmott' that .ould Aoply to Colunn 2 Or!dgtno MOre thin 10~ cubic yards of ..terti' from chlnnel of . protected stream. N ..lL Constructfon in I design_tld freshwater or ttda' wetland. Potential encroachment on tidal Other tll'lPICts: wetlands abutting Long Creek 4. WILL PROJECT AFFECc ANY NON. PROTECTED EXISTINr. ~R NFW NO YES BODY OF HATERI ......00......0..........0............0. ....0 EXI~les that Would Apply to Column 2 ~ Ala: tnCrtlse or decreast tn the surfa,e 'rll of Iny body of wlter or more thin I 10 'Crt incrtlse or decrI.se. .li. Construction of I bOdy of .,ter that exceeds In .cres of surfiC' Ire,. Other imlCts: Potential-4...IQEac1:2_~~~~ Lake s. "ILL P~OJECT AFFFCT SURFACE OR ~ROUND""TER nIlALlTY? NO YES Ox [xamales that Would Apply '-0 Col~ 2 ~ Prnject will ~~ulr! . diSCharge peMftit. ..::L Project reQuires US! of a sourte of ~itfr thit does not hive 400rov.l to serve 'reposed project. ....ll. Project reQuires water sUDOly from wells with ~re.ter th." ~5 ~.llons per minute ,uma;ng CIDicity. -lL Construction or ODerltion C.using '"y conta~inat;O" Of a public witer sUDPly syste~. -1i Project will .dver-sely .ffect groundwlter. -'1. liQuId effluent w,11 b. conveyed off the site to f,ciliti'5 which Drese~tly do not ,xist Or hive 'nadeouate CIDIC1ty. N P"oJect l"eoIl1"'"9 I flcility t~lt would :.l~e ..It,,. il'l UCtSS of 2f"\./lOO ;.110"5 j)'" C1,v. ~ ProJect W.lll lhell cluse siltation or other dhc",rq. ,"to In f.,sttng c=:y of w.ter to t"I Ixtent thlt t"ere will, ~e ,n ':Itlv;ous v;suIl COI'IU'ut to nltu,..1 conClitlOI'lS. ..... ~'_LL Tf) DERATE PA T x - x x . 1 . 2.. pnIE"IAL L<RGE "'1\.1. T x x 3. CAN "'PACT BE REDUCED BY P~OJtCT CHANGE . ')th..r ("'Diets. 6. :'lll PROJeCT ALTER DRII"ME Fl!l". PITTE~'5 OR SIlRF.~E !JATtR 1IO YES R!JH'JFF? ....... ..................... ......... ...... .... .... OQ ~ that '1ould ''Iply to Col"",, 2 N Project .nuld t~de 'lo~ wlter flows. ~ Project 1s lftely to CIUS. substlntial erosion. ~ Project is '''corp.tibl, with e.'st1n9 dratn,,, patterns. Y Ot"er fllD.etl: Significant drainage impacts eQuid occur. JHPACT t)" .n 7. rill YES ~lll PROJECT AFFECT AIR OUAlITY?.,........................~ 0 Furnolts tftlt Would Apply to Col"", Z Project .,11 induct 1.~ or .ore vehicle trips 1n Iny given hour. Project w111 result in the fflc1n.rltt"" Of lID,.. than 1 ton ~f ,..fuse per hour. Project ttRissfon rlt, of 111 cont...fn.nts .ill 'ICHtf 5 lbs. Iter hour Or I hlat InUrel "l"'OdllCtnlJ "'" thin 1:) .fllton STU's per hour. Other- flflDlctS: IMPACT ON Pt"NT~ ANO "'H'P-AI 'l; B. WIll PROJECT AFFECT MY THREATENED OR ENOANr,EREll SPECIES? !lO YES 00 Ellmoles thlt Would Apol, .to ColUBn 2 ..E Aftductfon of one or lOre SPfctl' lfstld on the New York or Federa' lfst. us1nv the s1ta, OWlr or near sit. or found on the site. Removal of anv DOrtion of I criticll or SiQnificlnt wild- l1f. /l'OIt.>t. p N _o~11cltinn of Pesticide or ~erbicide over mart thin tt.;C! . ~el" othe,. thin tot" .,..:coutur..l piolIrpoIes. "t:'l~r fr.lDlcts: Possible without verification along Long Creek D ...... 9. !/ILL PROJECT"SUBSn:lTIAlLY AFFECT I!ON-THREATE:'ED OR NO YES E'OAN~ERED SPECIES? .......................................00 EXlmol~ that ~uld Aoply to Col~ % rroJect ~ould substantially tntfrfere w;th anv ~S;~fnt or m;qratory f;s~ or w;ldlife SgfC;~S. . p p Project reQuires t~e r~v.l Of MOre t~.n l~ .cres of ~ture ferest (over lon ~f,r~ ;n .nt) or ot~er loc:l1v 1mcortant vegetat;on. -I- . 1. 2. 3 '\ALL Tr pnTE'TIAl r.Ar~ IIlPACT BE itiDEPArr LAJlGE .EDUCE~ Or I~"PAC';" J"'P"cr PR~JECT CHArlGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X - - - X - - - - - - - -1i.. - - - - X - - - X - - - . . 1. 2.. ~ 1'. L:JI.L Tl.IE Dot:l-JfCT ~rrtC7 '11~!f!. vISTAS C~ T!!f I/f~ll~l. CI-I,qACTER OF THF. :1F'lGHBI")"uI'YJD /')p, co",u:nV? .............. 'I'! YE OQ WALL TO "CTEfIT IAL c.~:: I,"PACT " (,~ERATE l'RGE ~EOUCEO ~Y ywr'l6.Ci J"rAC: p"nJECT n'~r;G(, ~ X - - - X - - - X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X - - - - - - X - - - X - - - - - - -lL - - - - - - - - - - - - - !''''/I(; C'; '..tS~'~'l A~~::'Rcr Ex~mI"l1!'s tnlt lIould A:>oly to Column 2 ...:J.. An ~ncom~lt;ble visual e(fect caused bv the intro~uct;nl"l of new I'IIUri.ls. colors '"0/0,= {ami. 'in ,.,"trast to the surround1M lendSc.". on M~ .1 Lane y A ol"Oject elStl~1 visH'le. not '1511y SCrteMd,that 1s Obviously diff'rent 11"01:1 flth!!,.s around it. on Mill Lane y Project ~ill result 11"1 the f'lil"inltion or lIIajor screening of Scenic views or viStas kn~'m to be important to the Ire.. Other impacts: I~P'CT ON HI~TORIC RESOURCES 11. WIll PROJECT IMPACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE or HISTORIC. NO YES PRE.'<l~Tn'IC nR PAlE~NTOr.ICAllrr'PTANCE? .................00 E~lmole5 that ~uld Aoolv to Colynn 2 Prt'.1tct occur;na wholly 0" nartillly wftMn or contf9uous to Iny facflity or site listed on the Nltionll _eofster of historic ,1Ices. Any fmplct to In Ircheologicll site or fOSSfl b-.d loclted within the project sHe. l)ther 1""ICU: Potential impact on Sununer without safeguards. house . I"PACT ON OPEN SPACE & RECREATIOn 12. WIll THE PROJECT AFrECT THE OUANTITY OR OUAllTY or EXISTING NO YFS OR ruTURE OPEII SPACES OR RECREUJONAl OPPORTU~ITIES?..... 0 0 EXlmoles thlt Would Aoply to Column 2 y T~e pe~lnent foreclosure of I future recre~tfonll oDoortun1ty. Y A major rP.duct;on of In open SPIC! i~ortlnt to the community. -.:i. "thtr t!IIDlcn: Loss of Lona Creek Open Space Greenbelt continuity lWD(CT nN TRA~SPORTATJO~ 13. "Ill THERE BE M. ErrECT TO EXISTIflG TRANSPORTATInN SYSTE"'S? ............................................... ~O YES ~O Etamoles that Would A~~ly to Col~" Z ~lteratlon of oresent ~atte..ns of MOye~nt cf ~eoDle Ind/or ;OOdS. ~rOleCt will result in severt traffic 'rODl~s. Jther ir:outs: ---------- --- ----.--- .R. . I"PACT O~ E~ERGY 14. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE C~~ITIES SOURCES OF FUEL nR ~O YES ENERr,y SUPPLY? ......................................... "eo Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Project Clusing Qrelter thin 5S increase tn Iny fQrm Qf energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creltion or extension of In Inorgy transmission or suPply system to serve more thin 50 sinql. D~ t~ family residences. Other Impacts: IMPACT OH HOISE 15. WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE OOORS, NOISE, GLARE. YIBRATlnN ~ YES or ELECTRIcal OISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? .. "00 Examoles that Woulrl Aooly to Column 2 Blasting wtthin l,5nO f.ot of I hospital, school or othlr sensitiye facility. Odors will occur routinely (nore thin one hour per doy). Project will oroduce ooerlting noise exc.odine the lQcll ambient noise leyels for noise outside of structures. Project will remoye naturll blrriers thlt would ICt IS I noise screen. nther imoacts: tf'PACT OM HEALTH & HAZARDS 16. ~ILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC IlEALTH ANO SAFETY? Htl YFS ......... ....00 Examole, that Would Apply to Column 2 Project will cause I risk of ex~losion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil. pesticfdr.s. chemicals, radiation. etc.) in the event of accident or uDset conditions. or there will he I chronic low level discharge or en1ssion. Proj~ct that will result in the burial of Mhazardous wlstes. (t.!. toxic. pnfsonous. highly reactive, radioactive, irritating. infectious. etc. I includ1M wlstes that Ire solid, serni.solid, liqUid Dr contain gases.) Storace facilit1~s for one mill ton or mo~e Gallnns of l;ouified "atu~al gas or other l;ouids. . r)ther ;moacts: 't._ .!t. . 01 2. ~ S~LL Tn pnTE~n~L ,- CAil IHPACT CE ~DERATE LA~GE RED~CED 6Y IMPACT l'lPACT PROJECT CHANGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . " I}lPACT 0'1 G;!Q'JTH AND CHARACTJ:q: OF' CO~UNITY OR flEtGI-lPiORlo4noO 17. WILL PROJECT ArrECT THE CHAPACTE' ^r THE EXISTING NO YES CO~NITY? ........ .,...... ..... ......... ..................00 EXI~le that Would Apoly to Column 2 The population of the City. Town or Village in which the project is located is likely to 9row by more than S~ of resident humin population. The municipal budgets for capit.l expenditures or opera- ting services will fncrels' by more thin SI per Vllr IS I ,,!SuI t of tt'lis project. . Wil' involve Iny 'ermanent facility of I non-agricultural use in In Igricultural district or removt nr1me agricultural lands from cultivation, The project w111 repllce or ,liminate existing 'ac11fties. structures or areas of histortc importance to the community. Development will fnduce .n influx of I particular age group with spectlt needs. Project will set In important precedent for future proietts. Projett will relocate lS or more tm"loyees in one or ~re bus i nes $IS. Other illlDacts: la. IS THERE PUaLIC CONTRCVFRSY CONCERNING THE PRnJECT? NO YES .......QO Examcles thlt Would Apply to COlUMn Z Etthe~ goytrnment or citizens of IdjlCt~t communities haye expressed oo~osition or rejected the pro1ect or hlye not been contacted. Object1ons to the nroject from within the c~nity. . IS/IA~~ Tn POT~~~!AL (;~O~~~~C~yBE ~OERI.TE . LARr.E IrPArT 1f'",CT PROJECT CHANGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ir ANY ACTION IN PART 2 IS IDENTlrlEO AS A P1TENTIAL LARGE IMPACT on IF YOU CANNOT DETERMINE THE MAGNITUOE or IMPACT, PROCEEO TO PART 3. MRTlONS or EAr CGNPLETED RlR THIS PROJECT: PART I ~ PART II ~ PART 3 ~ DETEo.INATlON Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1. 2 and 3) .nd considerinQ both the maanitude Ind 1mQOrtance of elch 1mQact. it is rP..son.bly determined th.t: A. The project will result in no major imolcts .nd. therefore. is one which may not cluse signific.nt damaoe to th~ environment. S. Although the project could h.ye I significant .ffect on the ~nv1ronment. there will not be a significant ~ffect in this clse because the m;t1~ltion measures described in PART J haye been included as ~~rt of the oroposed project. C. The ~roject w;11 !"esutt in that cannot be reduced an t environment. l H. "'L'" PREPARE A NEr-ATIVE DECLARATION o PREPARE A NEr~TIVE nECLARATIOU o PREP^RE .O~TIVE ~RATIOU PROCEED WITH EIS ~it""Ur='";or q,-SDonsibJe OffICial HI Liild . 4.gency ~nt or ty~e na~e of responslble Offici,l 1n Lud Agenc.., .' . . E~F EJlVIROIIMENTAL ASSESSllENT PART III . EVALUATlOa OF THE I~PORTA~CE OF IMPACTS 1~IFORMATlOIl - Part 3 is prepared if one or mare impact or effect 1s considered to be potentially larae. The amount of writing necessary to answer Part 3 ~y b~ determined by answering the Question: In briefly completing the instructions below hive I placed in this reco~ sufficient information to indiclte the reasonlbleness of my decisions? INSTRUCTIONS Complete the fol1owinq for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 of Part 2: I. Briefly describe the impact. 2. '-scribe (if apolicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than la"ge imnact by a Pro- ject c~ange. 3. Based on the information available, deCide if it is reasonahle to conclude that this i""act is important to the miniCipality (City, town or villaqe) in which the project is located. To answer the question of importance, consider: - The probability of the impact or effect occurrinq - The duration of the impact or effeet - Its irreverSibility, including permanently lost resources or values - Whether the impact or .ffeet can be controlled - The regional consequence of the 1~ct or eff~ct Its potenti.' divergence from lOCI' ne.ds and golls - Whether known Objections to the' project a~oly to this impact or effoct. DETERI'INATlON OF SIGlIIFICA~CE ^n action is considered to b. significant if: One (or more) imDact is determined to both lame and its (their) conseoutnce, bls.d on the reviow .bove, 1s 1rnoortant. PAPT III STATE~E~TS (Continue on ^ttachments, IS needed) ._~..... -11. . . WOLF PIT PART III APRIL 21, 1987 1. PHYSICAL CHANGE Significant potential for erosion and sedimentation into Long Creek exists if any of the slope below the 20 foot contour and/or wooded area sloping to Long Creek is disturbed. Likewise, land below the 25 foot contour at Wolfpit Lake should remain undisturbed. 3. WETLANDS To avoid any disturbance to this pristine wetlands, no docking or boating should be permitted this far up Long Creek in addition to nc disturbance to vegetation. 6. DRAINAGE Wolfpit Lake already suffers from adverse drainage impacts. Non-disturbance of the sbpes around it is needed to prevent additional impacts. The swale leading to Long Creek needs protection against disturbance to avoid adverse impacts to Long Creek. 8. & 9. WILDLIFE A complete inventory of flora and fauna and habitat is necessary to verify non-significant impact on rare, threatened, or endangered species. 10. VIEWS Development proposed on Mill Lane blocks significant views to and from the site. Development can be strategically placed with more flexible treatment of lot sizes and dwelling types to ensure visual integrity. 11. HISTORIC RESOURCE The Se mmer house on the property is a locally significant structure worthy of preservation. 12. OPEN SPACE The Southold Master Plan recommends an open space greenbelt along Long Creek. As proposed, Lots 14 - 17 preclude extending that Greenbelt. These lots need to be pulled back from Long Creek via a protective easement. . . \ \.... . ,.,\1 / Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 10, 1987 Mr. David J. Saland Saland Real Estate, Inc. Main Road Jamesport, NY 11947 Re: Wolf Pit Associates Dear Mr. Saland: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, March 9, 1987. WHEREAS, David J. Saland, as a general partner, has applied to the Southold Town Planning Board for a subdivision for 27 lots on 64 acres in the cluster concept located at Mill Road, Mattituck, to be known as Wolf Pit Associates, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That pursuant to the provisison of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law; Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action proposed is Unlisted and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Planning Board shall file and circulate such determination as required by the aforementioned law, rules and code. 3. That the Planning Board immediately notify the applicant, David J. Saland, general partner of Wolf Pit Associates, of this determination, and further request said applicant to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement inaccordance with the 'De and contents required by the Planning Board and Towr 'er, all in accordance with said law, rules, and coe' " . session has been scheduled we will advise . . David J. Saland Page 2 3/10/87 ---------------------------------------------------------- If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yo~ Ju., ~ rYv/ ~OWSKI' JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary - ....... . ...4- ~ ..._)~ "-"-''i, )> -..Ii ~. i < .. fl" U,h. 1:';01 . -----.---- -YOWN OF SOUTHOLD i)A i EAr ENVIRO;IHENTAL ASS!:SSHENT : 'PART Proiect Ynfonmation NOTICE: This dOCU,"O: <. deS'~ned to ass1st in determining whether the action proposed may have a signific effect on the erlvl,.c.,:n.:ant. Piease co~lete the entire Data Sheet. Answers ti) these ~uestions will be cor.s as D~rt of the ~pJi~ation for appreval and may be subject to fu~ther verifica:ion and public review. Pray any additional infot"l'1'ld.tion you believe will be needed to comoletp. PARTS Z and 3. It is expecteo tnat cc~olcticn of the EAr will be dependent on information cu;rently available and will nOt ,nvolve new Stud,es,.rese.rc,.cr inveStiaation. If information requirino such additional work is unav.i~ble, so 1ndl:ate and SDeC1fy each lnstance. , ~AHE OF PROJECT: NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Oiff.".nt! Wolf Pit Associates '. (Name) AuORESS AND NAME OF APPLICANT: (Street) David J. Saland - Partner lha",,) Main Road lot,.".t) Jamesport, NY 11947 (P.o.) (Sto:el (LIp) -. TP:c.l 8UstN:SS PHONE: (State) (Zip) OESCRIPTlC~ OF PROJECT: (Briefly describe type of project or action) 65+ acres in Mattituck into 27 lots major subdivision of (PLEASE COHPLETE EACH QUESTION. Indicate N.A. if not applicable) A. SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overail project. both develoned and undeveloped areas) I. General character of the land: roaner.lly uniform Slope ~ Generally uneven and rol11n9 or irre~ula. 2. P,."s.nt land use: Urean , Industrial , COlll!lercial , Suburban ......A.. Rural _.' Forest -X-. Agricu)tuF"e _' ryther '- _ J. iotal acreage of Dr-eject area: --fi:lacres. Aooroxfmateacreage: Meadow or Brushland Presently After Completion ~acres 41.7acres Presently After Complet o 0 I"later Surface Area _acres ___ac Forested ..d.....Cicres 2......5,.cres o __acres 1 __ae Unyegetated (rock. Urth or fill) Roads. buildinos and other ilaved surf~ces 1.....l. a c Ao,.icultural -!L..acres ~acres 'lptJdnd (Fre'ihwater or Tiddl ~s oer Articles ?4, :~ or c.C.l.} _~~cr.s ~aCl"'es -2.:2oc.es '. Other (indicate tY"e) 1 acres 15 ae 1 - lawns'- f.-.Y.!!l.'?'d.t;Jl_.~'2.~Il!Y sand; haven l.oam ~--._--"--_. 'J"a~ 10; .....~domln"~t son t:/pds) on "rCt~ect site? 5. . ~e :nerp ~pdroc~ Oulcro~o'nos o~ ~r~lPct Slt~? yps --X.. .~c l. ......1: :$ Cp.::l~n tc ~ed"ccl.:? .---------.-MlA-.____('n ""eet) 9:1::5 ,/ " .- , 6. A~proxinate percenta~e of proposed oroject sfte with slaees: O.10~ ~~~ 1~-1~~ ~%; 15: or greater ~x. 7. Is project contiguous to. or contain a buildf"" or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? _Yes ~No . , 8. What Is the depth to the water table? _____feet O' min 30' maximum 9. 00 hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? _____yes ~No 10. Does project s1te contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endanQered - ~Yes ~Io. according to _ Identify each species 11. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. c1fffs. dunes~other geological fo~ations - ______yes ~No. (Describe 12. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area... _Yes --X....No. 13. Does the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? _Yes -lL-No 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of stream and name 'of river to which it is tributary Long Creek 15. Lakes, Ponds, ~et1and areas within or contiguous to project area: a. flame Wnlf Pir T.:::.lcA ; b. Size (in acres) 1 acre 16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential, R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). AR80~- B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 65 acres. b. Project acreage developed: ~ acres initially; ~ acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped .21..~-es open space d. Length of project. in miles: n/a (if appropriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot. age ; developed acreage . N/A . f. tlulT'ber of off.strE:P.t parking spaces existin!J g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 3 h. If residential: Number and type of housinq units: 2 i proposed 54 (upon completion of project) ~ne Fam; ly Two Fam; ly Multiple Family Condominium Inilial 27 Ultimate 27 1. If: Orientation :'ei grlbornoOd-C i ty-Reg i ona 1 Estimated Emoloyment N/A Co~erclal Industrial j. Total he1gnt of tallest 'lrOr1osed structure __~5_.Jeet. .2- " ~ " .... " . 2. ~ . . How much naturo'l] material (i.e. rock. earth. etc.) will be removed from the site. o tons o cubic yar! J. How many acres of veqetation (trees. Shrubs. ground covers) will be r~ved fro~ site _ ~acres. 4. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by tnlS project? _____yes ~No S. Are thprr. any plans for re-vegetation to reolace that removed during ~onstruction? ~~es _____~o 6. If single Dhase project: AntiCipated period of construction _months. (lnc}uding demolition). N/. . 7. If muJti-~ha5ed oroject: a. Total number of phases anticipated _____No. N/A b. Anticioated date of co~encement phase ~ ______month ______vear (includlng demolition) c. Approximate comeletion date final phase montn .-----year. d. Is phase 1 financiall.v dependent on subseouent Dhases? _Yes _____No 8. Will blasting Occur during construction? ______yes ~Ho 9. Number of jabs generated: during construction ~; after project is complete ~. 10. Numb.. of jobs eliminated by this p'oject ~. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ______yes ~No. If yes, exclain: 1Z. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ______yes ~No" b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) c. If surface disposal name of stream into wnich effluent will be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakes. ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by prooosal? ______yes ~No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? -X-Yes _No 15. a. Ooes p.oject involve disposal of solid waste? -X-Yes _No Household garbage b. If yes. will an existing solid waste disQosa1 faCility be used? ~Yes ___-110 c. If yes, give name: ~hln TnlJn f.;itnnfi:lll!cation rllt~ho\1llP- 16. Will project use herbicides or p~sticides? ~Yes _____~o d. ~'111 any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system 'Or into a sanitary landfill? _Yes _L~o Lawn care 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour Der day)? _____yes ~No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? _____yes ~No 19. l.Ii11 project result in an increase in energy use? ~Yes _No. If yes, indicate type!s) domestic electric 20. If water suooly is from wells indicate Oumoing capacity 21. Total antlclnated water usage per day _ JSjlOO Qals/day. 10 gals/1'I11nute. 22. 20n1n9: a. IIhat lS doninant zoning classification of site? _-.h~8~_ AR80 ------ b. Current specific zonlng classification of site !s oroco~ed us~ co~sjstpn: ,~jth nresent zon1nG? yes d. If no. indicate desired lor1nQ ---- --------- --.-.-. ---~-- -.1- .' , 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? ______yes ~o b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? Yes ~____No c. local and Regional approvals: City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City. Town, Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other local agencies CAC Other regional agencies Sta te Agent; es Federal Agencies C, INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Approval Required (Yes, No) (Type) ~s cluster subd ~ _sID:l.d__ ~ }.t'" ~a NYSDEC -=- wt=!lter,sewer on,,;rf"lnmoT'),ta1 Submittal (Date) " Approval (Date) Attach any additional infonmation as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the prop al, p1 se discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid them. PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: TITLE: REPRESENTING: DATE: .... ~ -4- ~.~~--_._-~-~...~...- - , . . . EM ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. _ PART II Gen~p"'i)l rl'1":":""'3ti,)~ ~Ri'-!f! Cd.refully) Project ImpJcts and Their MaQnitude - In comple'ing toe form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determina been re,so',ol.! The reviewer is not expected to be an exoert environmental analyst. Identi<y;ng that a, effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it s;onificant. o\r:y 1.rg. effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. efrect in column 2 Simply asks that it be looked at further. is al~o necessar By ident' fying The Examoles provided are to assist the reviewer by Showing types of effects and wherever possi~!e the of magnltuoe that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally apolicable through, State and for most situations. But, for'any specific project or site other examples andlor lower thre- mdy be more aD~ro~riate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples have been offered as They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each ouestion. - The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the lB questions in PART 2. Answer ~ if there will be !!l'! effect. b. Mavbe answers Should be considered as .Y!i answers. c. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the ootent size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will OCcur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact ~iJe" consider the imoact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large imoact Or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than lar, magnitud~. place a ~.es in cO~I,.'l7In 3. A No response indicates- that such a reduction is not possible. 1 ~ 3 IMPACT ON lAND 1. .Ill THERE SE A~ EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHAHr,E TO PROJECT SiTE? Exa~oles that Woul~ A~oly to Column Z NO yeS 00 Any co~stru;tio~ on ~lcpes of 15% or greater, {lS foot rise oer 100 foo~ of lengt'~:. cr where the general slooes in the project area eXceed lO~. Construct~on on Land wherp. the denth to the water table is less than 3 feet. rOnstruction cf o(lved oarklllQ are"' f('\r 1, "''''" or more vehicles. ~nstructjon on lJ~1 where bedrock IS eX~osed or Qenerally ~ltnln J feet cf existing ground surface. Cons';r:Jct"., tna' will ContInue for more than 1 vear or involve ~~~e ~ha~ ~r.~ "'~3~e or ~tdge, ["':i!V~':10n "01" :-;~'nlj :::lUrpOses that would ~e'!lOve nOre than 1,000 tG~S cf ~d:~~dl M~ter1al (i.e. rock Or 5011) per vear, CC.,st"'~Ctl0" of ,lny new sanlta~.',1 landfill. -5- SMAL L TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT MOOERA TE LARr,E REDUCED BY IMPACT !~PACT PROJECT CHA - - - - .- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Construction 1n a deslqnated floodway. Other impacts: z. --1!~ ~ILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIOUE OR UNIISUAL L~NO FnRHS 00 FOUND ON THE SITE? (i.e. c1iff~. dunes, aeologica1 forma- tlons. etc.]' . S~eci fi eland fonns: II'PACT ON WATER J. NO WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATE~ BOOY DESIGNATED AS ..........0 PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15, 24, 2S of the Envir- on~ental Conservation Law, E.C.L.) Examoles that ~ould A~ply to Column 2 Dredg1na more than 10~ cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Construction in a desi9n~ted freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: 4. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY tlON-PROTECTED EXISTING OR NFH NO BODY OF HATER? ............................................0 Exa~oles that Would Apply to Column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other imllacts: -------------.- S. "ILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE ~R GROIlND"ATER nIlALlTY? NO o EX!l"'oles that !.rould Ap:>ly t.o ColulI1n 2 Project will re'lulre a discharge pemit. Project requireS use of a source of water that does not have aporoval to serve ?reposed project. ProJect requ1res water supply from wells with ~reater than ~S oallons per minute ,umoing capaclty. Constr~ctlon or ooeratlon causing any contaMination of J puclic water suoply system. PrOject .",11 adversely affect groundwater. l1:::'J1Q effluent ,.i11 be conveyed off the site to fJ~11ltleS ....nlcn presently do not exist or have ln~~e1uate capaclty. PrOject requtrlnq a faCIlity that would use water in e~c~ss of 20.'100 gal Ions per dav. _ Pro;ect \~lll llkelj cause siltation or other d;Sctlarqe ln~o an el1stlnq t:~y of water to tne extent that there WIll ~e an ~OVIOuS VlSU,sJ contrast to natural condlt;ons. " 1. 2.. 3. ,~~A.LL Ttl POTE~T IAL CAN !"PACT BE i-;?E~;E L^RGE REDUCED BY HPA T II'lN.r.r pOOJECT CHANGE' - - - - - - -YES - - - - - - - - - 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - YES 0 - - - - - - - - - YES - - - C - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '. "....____~_'"_...,,_o...._._";_," '. , :. '.. .' . . ')thpr" I/floacts' -------------.- --------.-- . 1. 2.. 3. ~'IALL Tr pnTE~Tl^L CAU frlPACT ..,DEPATE lARG~ RE:.1l':CE:i) Cy I~~?AC7 P'P4CT PP~JECT C"A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6. 'IlLL PRnJCCT ALTER DR~IN^r,E FL1". P^TTE'~IS Oq SURFAcE !/ATER NO YES RUN~FF? ................................................... 00 ~ tha: ':ould 1-."'ply to ColuMn 2 PrOJect would 1m"ede flood water flows. Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. Project is 1nco~pat;ble with existing draina9! patterns. Other imnacts: IHP~CT ~N ArR 110 YES I'ILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR DUALlTY?..........................O 0 Fxamoles that Would Apply to ColulTl'l Z Pl"Oject wilT induce l/'lnO or 1I'Or-e vehicle trips in any given hour". 7. Project ...ill result in the incineration of II'Ore than 1 ton ~f refuse per hour. Project emission rate of all contaf'linants .,.,111 exc..erl 5 lbs. Der hour or a heat SOurce r.roducing mor~ than 1~ million BTU's per hour. Other imeaets: I"'OM'T n'l PI 4~JTS ""If) ~"IT~,at~ 8. WILL PP.OJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED DP. ENDANr.ERED SPECIES? E~amoles that Would Apoly to Column 2 Rp.duction of one or rrore species listed on the tlew York o~ Fede~al list. using the s1te. over or near site or found on the site. Re-moval of any oortion of a critical Or sicmif1cant wild- 11ft! tHb'Wt.. 40"licatil'ln of Pesticide or "e1tlici..:fl! over mor-e than t'o';c~ i1 :..eat" other ttun for"'S...~c;,ut.u,....l Pi.lrpor;,~s. ~!:""r ir.1oacts: 9. "Ill p'OJECT SU9STA:lTlALLY AFFECT l'nN.THREATE:lE~ OR NO YES E"~A1'C,[RE~ SPECIES? .:.........,....... ....................00 ~ that ~ouJd Apply to Colunn 2 r"Ol~ct would SUbstdntially interfere ....itt) an:' resirl~nt 0" Mlq,.atory flS~ Or wIldlife S;leCl,?5. P"':>Ject reouires the rprnoval of nore thall 1~ ac"es of :"",iture (crest !over Ian yedrs in ane) or otne,. locally In~'Jrtant ~egetatlon. .7- ~ YES 00 " 1 2.. ~ EXd~ol~S that ~ould A~~lv to Colu~n 2 NO YES 00 ~ALl Tn oCTE:n IAL C.\:I WP^CT .. "" 0~ERATE LARGE REDUCED ~y rl.lro,c"i {"rAti PRnJECT CP!\i-iGE . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P....f.Ci C': ':tSV"\l OC:~~:'Rcr EX,Jm.,l~s that lIould A~ply to Column 2 An incompatible visual affect caused bv the intro~uctinn of ne\., l'Iater;als. colors and/or forrr.s 'in contrast to the surround;n~ landsca~e. 00 1'. \-!t1.L T~E oonJfCT .HrEC7 vt~!J~. "tSTAS ~:t T!IF 1J1511l\L C~ARACTER OF TlIF. :IFIGHBnR"nlJO Or. CO.."'IITV? .............. A oraject easi11 visi~le. not easily screened,t!lat is obviously different fro~ nth~rs around it. ~ P~ject ~fl1 result in the p.li~ination or l'Iajor 5creen;nq of scenic views or vistas known to be important to the area. Other impacts: . I~PACT ON HI'TOqIC R,SOURCES 11. ~ILL PROJECT lI~P~CT ~NY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC, NO YES PRE_HI~TnOIC OP. P~LEO:ITOr,:CAL lI~rOPT~NCE? .................00 Exai.101es that l~ould Aool.v to Colur:n 2 Pre.1ect occurlna wnolly or nart1ally within or contiguous to any facility or site Hsted on the r~ational Ren;ster of historic ~laces. An:-t tm03ct to an archeological site or fossil bp.d located within the project site. I)ther in?3cts: I"P'CT 0N OP,N SPACE & P.:tP.EATIOIl 12. IIILL THE PROJECT AFFECT THE OUANTITY OR OUALITY OF EXISTIrlG NO YF.S OR FUTURE OPEII SPACES OR RECP.E.'TIorl~L OPPORTU~:rTIES?..... 0 0 Exameles that ~Iould Aoply to Column 2 T~e pernanent foreclosur~ of a future recreational oooortunity. A major rp.duction of an open space important to the co~unity. Other imoacts: r...."~r:T rHl TOMJSPr')PT~T!n'l 13. !tlLL T\-lEG~ SE A'j EFFECT TO EXISTHlC TRANSPORT,\TlnN SY$iE"'S? ............................................... Alteration of present ~atterns of nove~ent of ~eople andlor gOODS. PrOlect wj}l result in severe traffic 1roblems. ___ ~tner '~~~ct~: ---------- --- ---_.---- .R .~F'_"'W.. .,,,",,,.,,..~,,,,..~.~ 14. IllLl PROJECT AFFECT THE CO~HUNITlES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO YES ENERr,y SUPPlY?..........................................O 0 Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 . . ... :". ~ . ,. " I~PACT ON E'IERGY . Project causing qreater than 5% increase in any fonn of energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy transmission 01'" 5uppl.v system to serve more than 50 sinQle or "two family residences. Other impacts: . 1 2. ~ S'lAll TO POTE~nAl CAU IMPACT C /~OERATE lA~C;E REDUCED BY I ~PACT 1'1PACT PROJECT CHAN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPACT 011 NOrSE 15. wrll THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE OOCRS, NOISE, GLARE, VIBRATION NO YES Or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? ....00 Examoles that 1I0ul~ Aooly to Col_ 2 Blasting within 1.50n feet of a hosPital, school or other sensitive facilitv. Odors will OCCUI'" routinel.v (nlJre than one hour per day). Project will nreduce ooerating noise exceed in" the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Project will reMOve natural barri~rs that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: I~PACT OIl HEALTH & HAZARns 16. !/Ill PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC IIEAlTH AND SAFETY? ~m YFS .. ...........00 E"mo!es that I/ould ~pplyto Column 2 Project will cause a risk of ex~loSiQn or release of hazardous SUbstances (i.e. oil, pesticidr.s, chemicals, rarliation, etc.) in the event of accident or uoset conditions, or there will he a ChronIC 10'./ level discharge or enission. . Proj~ct t"at will result in the burial of "hazardous .....astes" (i.e. toxle, poisonous, highly reactive. radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., includinl1 1.oi3stes that are solid, se/TIi.solid, liquid or Contaln qases.) Storaoe facll1tlPs for One million or more qaJ10ns of 1ioulfied natural gas or other liouids. t')ther l~oacts: ----.-------- ----------.-- ------.----. .~. I~PACT ml Gll:01JTH AND CHARACTI=:R OF CO~mJNITY OR tl~!m.IR"IRLU')"'D . 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHAPACTER of THE EXISTING NO YES CO~>tJNITY? .............................. o. 0 .................. Examole that Would Apoly to Column 2 . The population of the City. Town or Village in which the pro~ect 1s loc!ted is likely to 9row by more than 5~ of resldent human Qopulation. The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or o~era- ting services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Will involve any ~ermanent facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricul tural district or remove nrime-agricultural lands from cultivation. The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities. structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will induce an influx of a particular age group with special needs. Project will set an important precedent for future pro1ects. Project will relocate 15 or more em~loyees in one or ~re businesses. Other imoacts: lB. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVeRSY CONCERNING THE PR0JECT? NO YES .......00 Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Either goYern~nt or citizens of adjace~t communities have expressed oo~os;tion or rejected the pro;ect or have not been contacted. Obiectl0ns to the oro.;ect from within the cOITTTllJRit.v. . ISIIALL TO POTE,'jTI/"IL C",ti lHPAC r at: f1ooERr.TE LARr,E REDUCED BY lI'PAr.T 1IIP~CT PROJECT CHANGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '. IF MY ACTION n: P.~RT 2 IS IDEIITlFIED AS A P0TEllTlAL LARGE IMPACT DR IF YOU CANNOT DETERMIIIE THE MAG1UTUDE OF IMPACT. PROCEED TO PART 3. PORTIONS OF EAF COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT; DETERMHIATlON PART I _ PART II - PART 3_ Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1. 2 and 3) and cons1dertnQ both the ma~n;tude and 1mnortance of each impact. 1 t 1 s rPod sonab 1 y determi ned tha t: PREMRE A rIEl':A T1 VE OECLARA nON A. The project will result in no major impacts and. therefore. is one which may not cause significant damaae to the environment. B. AlthOUQh the project could have a significant effect on the ~nv'ronMent, there wil' not be a significant effect in this case because tne mitloation measures described in PART 3 have been included as p~rl'of the nroposed proJect. . C. The project will result in one or more major adverse ;moaets that cannot be reduced and may cause si~nificant da~age to the envlronment. 04te Slgnature aT ~renarer (If alfferent from resnonslDl~ oiileer) o PREPARE A NOVE OECLARATlOU PREPARE POSITIVE ORATIU:1 PROCEED WITH EIS Signature of Rg,sponS1Cle Officlai In Ledd A.gencY ~rlnt or tyae na~e or responS10le oiflC\al 1n lead Agencv. , -rer e.,_.'_._,_--..'..'-."..----.~.'-.....'''....''"'---..--'',.,.. __",__~e"_"~. ..,~ . . ......,< ~ r [~F ElIVIROllMENTAL ASS[SS'~ENT - PART I I ( EVAlUATIn~1 OF THE l~pnRTA'ICE OF IMPACTS I~IFOR~TIO:I . Part 3 is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially laroe. . The amount Of writin~ necessary to answer Part 3 may b~ determin~d by answering the Question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I placed in this record sufficient information to indicate the reasonableness of ~v decisions? .;. INSTRUCTIDrIS . Co~lete the followinq for each impact or effect identified in Column Z of Part Z: 1. Briefly describe the impact. l. Ooscribe (if apolicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than large ;mnact by a pro ject c~ange. 3. Rased on the information available, decide if it is reasonahle to conclude that this iM~act is jmoortant to the minicipality (city. town or village) in which the project is located. To answer the question of importance. consider: The probability of the impact or p.tfeet occurring - The duration of the impact or effect Its irreversibility. including permanently lost resources or values - Whether the im~aet or effect can be controlled . The regional consequence of the imract or eff~ct Its potential divergence from local needs and goals . Whether known objections to the project a~ply to this impact or effect. OETER."INATlON OF SIG:IIFICA'ICE An action is considere~ ~o bp. significant if: One (or more) imoact is determined to both ~ and its (their) conseouence. hased on the review above. is imoortant. PAPT III STATE~E~TS {Continue on ^ttachments. as needed} . _11_ . . HENRY P. SMITH, President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRI'STEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 To: Planning Board From: Trustees Re: Wolf Pit Associates subdivision Date: March 30, 1987 The Trustees are in receipt of the Significant Environmental Assessment on the above project. May we have a copy of the map regarding this project for the Board to review? or~~ 81 ~~A.. 'b~ . Me 26 1987 Saland Real Estate, Inc. Licensed Real Estate Brokers Main Office: Main Road, Jamesport, NY 11947 - (516) 722-4990 lB REALTOR" March 24, 1987 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Sirs: Please find enclosed the Environmental Assessment Form for the Wolf Pit Associates proposed major subdivision at Mattituck, New York. Please advise if any further information is needed before we can meet for a scoping session to discuss the Environmental Impact Statement. f.\nnce~al ~ . aland General Partner Wolf Pit Associates DJS:ml Ene. CC: Howard Young Branch Offices: Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 - (516) 765-9805 Main Street, Southampton, NY 11968 - (516) 287-2277 - \. -, / fl rf[& ~ . . -, PROJECT 1.0. NUMBER NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF REGULA TORY AFFAIRS ,4-'6-4 (9/84) PART I ProJBct Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM bOO Far UNLISTED ACT/ONS Only , j \) \... _ \J ,. Applicant/sponsor 12. Project Name David J. Saland Wolf Pit A~~ociate~ major ~\ibdi vi~ior ) ProJect location; Municipality Hattituck, 'T'own of Southold County Suffolk ". Is propos~ action: 5Q N... o Expansion o Modification/alteration S Describe prOject briefly: Subdivi~ion of 64.4628 acres into 29 one PhIS acre lots '.vith 26+ acres of open space. - . Precise location (road intersections, prominent landmarks. etc. or provide map) north vle~t corner of Hill Road and Wickham Avenue (aka 'Uddle Road), Mattituck, Tmvn of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York '7. Amount of land affected: Initially 64.9 acres Ultimately 64.9 acres . Will proposed actIon comply with existing zonina or other existing land use restrlctionsl rn V" o No If No, describe briefly . What IS present land use In vicinity of prOlect? ~ Residential o Industrial 0 Commercial o Agriculture o Parkland/open space o Other ." Describe: .-. 10 Does action Involve QiermitlapprOvaJ, or funding, now or ultimately, from any other governmental agency (Federal, state or 10calH o Yes No If yes, list agencv(s) and permit/approvals 11 Does any aspect of the action have a currently valid permit or approval1 o V" IXI No If yes, list agency name and permit,lapproval type 11 As result of proposed action will ell.istine permit/appro",al require modificationl DYes Qj: No I CERTJFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE APPli""U'PO"'o~" A Date: . Dav:.~ )+ sa~Generj11 Partner, j.Tolf Pit A~"ociate~ Sienature: David .1. Saland. General P"rher. Wolf pit A~~ociate~ If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency. complete the Coastal Assessment Form belore proceeding with this assessment OVER , . .. . . -- PART II Environmental Assessment (To be completed by Agency) ^. Does action exceed any Type I threshold in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.12l DYe, 0 No If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FUlULONG FORM EAF. B. Will actIon receive coordinated review as provided for Unlisted Actions in 6 NVCRR. Part 617.n involved action ~ Ye, 0 No If No, a negati\ll! declaration may be superceded by anothe. C. Could action result .n ANY adverse eftecu on. to. or arising from the following: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) (1. Existlni air Quality, surface or ifoundwater quality or quantity, noise Il!vels, eXisting traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal. potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problemsr Explain briefly: ,., ~ I",. '" f4r Lbv..... .t:.AJIO:> L-~& Ca..~Tr:::.. EJz(),5JOtJ rl)t2AI.Jb.vt;;"": tf FWOOIIV& POTP:/-xn,t;..... ..... 'N...,.......- ~ . -r ak?0i3' ....,($ Hll"-f /)CIS'C ON U/I-I...- tJ.>.fojf.Z '~~IG r _I . _ ..:"SclCF".c.L€ V'JDTl;e- 'N11..A...- ~l.:" A....~l) Du02It..ll:;. c::.c.'''-3.~ ~-T101U I~~s;;.. 0. Historic, archeological. visual or aesthetic. or otnl!r natural or cultural rl!sources; agricultural districts; or community or nl!ighborhood characterl Explain brief ~ [S,lDe'ICL:.",--, .Ali;'eli ,L'>J.,)rJ rlDHe;: (3 Vegetation or fauna. movement of fish or wildlife species. significant habitats. or threatened or endangered specil!sl Explain bril!fty: WO...r ~T ArJl:) LoNU C~ Hp~ 6~ Dee- :SJt:~AJI"",~r -!I,45/rAr. ":;~I€..S Ur-Jk'-No'l\ltu A, T1-J1~ I1M":=,,. (,...tOfu t!e.1eN2cH tvlL-L ~ 7C l3e LX'NE.) (4 A community's existing plans or goals as offiCially adOPted. or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resourcesl Explain briefly. (5. Growth, subsequent development. or rl!lated activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain bril!fly. (6. Secondary, cumulative, or other effl!Cts not identified in (1-cM Explain briefly. --. C7 ^ change in use of either quantity or type of energy? Explain briefly. PART III Determination of Significance IT 0 be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (aJ setting (i.e. urban or rural); (bJ probability of occurring; (cJ duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified ~d adequately addressed. B Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY Occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL/LONG FORM EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. o Check this box if you have determined. based on the information and analYSis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any Significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide here, and on attachments as necessary. the reasons supportng this determination: A8~ncy N.m~ Alency Preparl!r's N.m~ Prt.p;u.-r's Signa1Url!ITitJ~ Oat~ ~ . .OUNTY OF SUFFOLK . . .~. .J\~ti1.,;, -:;....". M"'~ ~\ ~L~.I..:1 ~ Michael A. LoGrande SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER February 6, 1987 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Wolfpit Associates, Subdivision Application S.C.T.M. #1000-107-4-21 Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Department your letter of December 8, 1986 application and has no objection to of Health Services has received regarding the above-referenced your designation as lead agency. We have reviewed the information provided with your letter, and submit the following comments regarding Sanitary Code compliance and natural resource concerns. I. Sanitary Code The proposed action appears to conform with the minimum lot size requirement of Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. A subdivision application has been filed with our office in July 1986 and does not appear to have been approved. Test well and test hole data along with a typical cross-section and plot layout for construction of a subsurface sanitary sewage disposal system are required. There is an out-parcel (n/f Jerry Martin and Iris S. Serner) tha t is not indicated on the 1981 subdivision map. This matter should be addressed and corrected as required. II. Natural Resources On January 5 and February 3, 1987, Office of Ecology staff conducted field inspections of the subject parcel. We provide the following comments as a result of these investigations. COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAO. N. Y. 1 1901 ~~'b\~~ , .,. . . 2. n. . A. Tidal Wetlands The Long Creek tidal wetlands adjacent to lots 8 through 16 are relatively undisturbed and should be protected. These wetlands contribute to Long Creek's water quality by providing a natural sedimentation area and filtering basin for the absorption of silt and organic matter that might otherwise collect in the creek. The wetland is also capable of providing limited pollution treatment by serving as a biological and chemical oxidation basin. This characteristic is valuable in light of the impending develop- ment of this site wherein runoff is likely to accelerate in flow and degrade in composition as a result of additional pollutant loading (fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides). Much of Long Creek's original wetland fringe already has been severely altered or removed. The integrity of the remaining wetland at its headwaters, therefore, is of utmost importance to water quali ty and to wildlife, which use this area for food, cover and nesting. The tidal wetland boundaries indicated on the subdivision map should be approved or delineated by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). The approved DEC wetlaI;ld delineation should be indicated on all future maps for this project. We recommend that lots 8, 13, 14, 15, and 16 be reconsidered for the purpose of excluding tidal marsh from within their property boundaries. We believe that the integrity of the wetlands would be preserved best if they are placed in dedicated open space or covered by a protective scenic easement. B. Freshwater Wetlands As a result of public hearing held in 1985, DEC received many nominations of freshwater wetland areas for additions to their wet land regula tory maps. According to DEC, the public nominated Wolf Pit Lake and areas adjacent to the tidal wetlands of Long Creek as wetlands of "unusual local importance." As we understand it, DEC is determining which nominations should be added to the maps, through field checks, prior to finalization ("filing") of the freshwater wetlands maps for Suffolk County. Staff wa ters of smartweeds covertype, wetland. identified freshwater wetland vegetation at the head- Long Creek during their February 3 visit. Phragmi tes, and climbing false buckwheat comprised the "wet meadow" which constitutes the major portion of the freshwater If DEC adds Wolf Pit Lake and freshwater wetlands adjacent to Long Creek tidal wetlands to the regulatory maps, lots 4 - 8 and 13 - 16 could be affected by Article 24 (Freshwater Wetlands Act) regulations. We suggest the applicant plan for such a contingency. . ;- . . 3. . . We recommend the applicant have the DEC show the boundaries of the wetlands on or within 100 feet of the subdivision property, and then have a surveyor plot the limits on the subdivision map. The freshwater wetlands provide several of the same benefits as the tidal wet lands. In addi tion, they provide fresh water to the tidal areas, which reduces salinities. The resulting estuarine environment is conducive to fish and shellfish propagation. Freshwater wetland vegetation provides additional covertypes, which increases both plant and animal species richness in the area. We support full protection of the freshwater wetland on or near this parcel. We hope you will use the information we have provided to urge the applicant to redesign the subdivision (1) to include the tidal and freshwater wetlands in the open space dedication, and (2) to show maximum building and clearing setbacks in their revised design. C. Topography Lots 13, 14, 15, and 16 appear to be constrained for develop- ment by the presence of tidal and freshwater wetlands and moderate sloping grades. We believe that the development of these parcels should not involve extensive cuts, fills or grading, because such activi ties would increase the potential for erosion, particularly during construction. Erosion from these lots could increase sedimenta tion into the wetlands and subsequently smother wetland vegetation. We recommend, therefore, that the applicant provide further information about grading plans as well as pre- and post-construc- tion erosion control for this portion of the subdivision if an open-space dedication of this area will not be considered. According to the subdivision sketch plan, lots 4, 5, 6, possess steep slopes adjacent to Wolf Pit Lake parkland. slopes should be protected from construction activities, clearing, or chemically-intensive landscape management. activities have the potential to degrade the water quality of Pit Lake and the scenic character of the parkland. and 7 These tree Such Wolf The construction of residential dwellings on the above- mentioned lots could increase runoff in the direction of the lake as a result of the creation of impervious surfaces (dwellings, dri veways, sidewalks, etc.). In addition, runoff from residential developments often contains chemical fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides which can degrade the quality of nearby, collecting waterbodies. We recommend that drainage from each lot be recharged on site or directed to the proposed recharge basin. The existing tree line tained because it provides absorption. Although the along for a slopes lots 6, 7 reduction on lots and 8 should be main- in stormwater flow by 5 and 6 are sparsely '. \- ---.--- . 4. . . vegeta ted and managed, they do provide ground cover and should not be considered for any structural development which might increase runoff and promote erosion, During our inspection of the lake, we found that the steep slopes also provided a natural visual buffer from the activities on the adjacent upland. Because Wolf Pit Lake is a local parkland with scenic qualities, we believe that maintaining integrity of the slopes in their undeveloped state would be in the public interest. III. Conclusions We find that four lots on the subject site appear to be con- strained for development by the presence of freshwater and tidal wetlands and moderate slopes. Five lots possess steep slopes and adjoin a local parkland and freshwater pond. We are concerned about the potential impacts this parcel may have on wetland systems and character of the local parkland. the development of the natural scenic We, therefore, encourage the town to employ a sensitive review of this parcel and require that the applicant provide more informa- tion about natural features and development constraints on this parcel. A t this time our principal concerns regarding the Wolf Pi t Associates application include the following: 1. Protection of the tidal and freshwater wetlands 2. Delineation of wetland boundaries 3. Building envelopes and erosion control measures for lots 13, 14, 15, and 16 4. Protection of steep slopes and vegetation adjacent to Wolf Pit Lake 5. Protection of the scenic quality of Wolf Pit Lake parkland Thank Should you contact the you for the opportunity to review this have any questions or concerns, please Office of Ecology at your convenience. application. feel free to ~j.4"<,~ Louise W. Harrison Supervisor, Bureau of Environmental Management LWH/amf cc: Vito Minei Steve Costa , \ " . e '" ! I'I'U'U \ ~ i>IWZ>I " I f'l- ~ ,_ M_.'_"___~-"'''_'''_'''_'~'''' ,,,..,,-,'- L" r;o" _.. j--. ..-.,. " /.. / '/' '."""'-',0 ,-,..... ."~.. " , " "~. .. .. ... ,/ "" ",' \ '01 (I. H' Jl~ "'-, Q' "'" ,h 10'; l"" ~.,.~~'_..,. '~'_'Pl'~ --.qrH ...:.....:.--.~ . .\ - ..... ...- J I -- E.OOI -:~~-;i;;(^:)ua6v .~-;!^-~~~.~)C~;M;~;~:J~.I-::;. OOllJ"i\= a-lo~inos- :..0";01 )110:1:105 :10 AINnO) @ t.,.... "...." '" '" ~.. '"" """. ...,,.,"",".....ol,,,..'....... ---" "._ ,,~~..:t;~:~E:.:,:;::;;""',;~3.~~~.1 - >0..... ---,." ..~-..." - ''''''''' S ",,0' ""....0 "'.0""' '" ...,..... j___ <I"...O..,,.'..,.,,.'O....,",,.o~ ."o~nlin.'\. A-:"'" _. ,"" z ~Jl._~J\ /?;. "f\../ --:: ~>\~.'; --." ~\ \' ~ ~ ~ '~.,.",,~":.o J'''''' . "vI,'" ( \'\ ~\ ,.'''0'" C~ '" D, ON H'""" ~G, ; P)WiOl .. ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ " , '" , , ~ 1>lft'WI " ';~ I \ " \" _-.O'O""ONOl~ n. "CI~1l""'4"(" \ "",~~. -,,~: '~,,;: \ \ ,.' ,''',.~ ~" .. , , j. ... " ;~-. ,J,. ii.'" .n !iJ.,;' fJ-j, ;,/-J, "J-t .1-.$' ~.. f~,' U".' <;e',,' ,~ ....-. U" lJ-f '1'-', JI-, ~.'I ,. i=- ;-i '. , . '1'-"'--'-- .~ .-------. ' ":,:" ,.''> ~. ~. I I ,I ,I ., 1 ~ 1 ,i " 1''''' ,~ .. !>l . > ,~ 'Pl>6U , .. I' ,. '" , <'1..6> , '/ .~ / /, '.'// \ /:' :/\ \ "/~" .(>.\\ \ ".">'~;\\\\\ \ / b' "',\ ~./j \ " X' \,;~,/ : I ('I.." . ~ : --f::;l-- ~I q ,. ., '" o . I~. ;..~ . ~ '\. , 1'1.,0[ ,., :, ,,,. , Af!' "\ . \~ / ;f...... ,>.<. .,... ../".,>',/" // , . "- " ~.a.' ~r-:() , 000' :~J>,,~e~~:::')-:y;~~dO'd'.,.1f ,..,..,.-,.... -", ,.,,- Vf:-'-f''. <'-.........-... \ ......."'...,.:" .........~~ - .. -. T LD Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 December 8, 1986 Environmental Analysis Unit DEC, Building 40, Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 Gentlemen~ Enclosed find a completed Short Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the map of the subdivision of Wolf Pit Associates located Mattituck, tax map no. 1000-107-4-2.1. This project is unlisted and an initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. We wish to coordinate this action to confirm our initial determination. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until December 22, 1986. We shall interpret lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and our agency will assume the status of lead agency. V:;;;;JiluOr~OrcL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN ~ SOUTH OLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. cc: Department of Health Services T , , LD y Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 December 9, 1986 Mr. David J. Saland Saland Real Estate, Inc. Main Road Jamesport, NY 11947 Re: Wolf Pit Associates Dear Mr. Saland: The following actions were taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, December 8, 1986. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare themselves lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act for the major cluster subdivision of Wolf Pit Associat, located at Mattituck. An initial determination of non-significan, has been made. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the sketch map for the major subdivision of Wolf Pit Associates for 27 lots on 64 acres in the cluster concept located at Mill Lane, Mattituck, survey dated as amended November 5, 1986. Upon receipt of the preliminary submission , we will make the necessary referrals and schedule a public hearing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, ~ ()/L~l}ctM-' BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary - . T LD Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 December 30, 1986 David Saland c/o Saland Real Estate, Inc. Main Road Jamesport, NY 11947 Re; Wolf pit Associates Dear Mr. Saland: Enclosed is a copy of correspondence received from the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) with regard to the above mentioned subdivision proposal. As you can see, a DEC Tidal Wetlands Permit will be required. We ask, therefore, that you make the necessary applications and advise us when you have received the approvals. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, ~-te 01LloLu~Iov-~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTH OLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. 14-UO-l{7/841 . NEW YORK STATE IjEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONM L CONSERVATIO:-.J o .~. 1986 REGuLATORY AFFAIRS DEe;:, Ie INTER-OaE SPEED MEMO (USE ONLY FOR UNOFFICIAL COR- RESPONDENCE) TO: FROM: I ......... REPLY AT BOTTOM OF THIS FORM II . NO~ '2, 1986 Sa land Real Estate, Inc. Licensed Real Estate Brokers Main Office: Main Road, Jamesporl, NY 11947 - (516) 722-4990 November 10, 1986 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Sirs: Please find enclosed twelve prints of the revised sketch plan for Wolf pit Associates proposed cluster subdivision at Mattituck, New York. These plans have been revised in accordance with your request of October 22, 1986 to open up the North-east and area just north of the proposed road in order to provide a vista to the open space. Please advise as to when this proposed subdivision will corne before your board for hearing. Sincere~, ~\~saland DJS:ml Encs. cc: Sebastian J. Navarra, Esq. Branch Offices: Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 - (516) 765-9805 Main Streei, Southampton, NY 11968 - (516) 287-2277 [B REALTOR~" _ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. BUILDING-STRUCTURE INVENT~ FORM MK- 38 t~r~;';T;-' D1VIS~~~ FOR HISTORIC PRESERV A nON UNIQUE SITE NO. . ~,. .:\;}~(t '!",~~~~;~1r~i~A:~:::~',::~:::';;R" nO'~~~~~:A". "Fall 19B5'.....,.'...;,_.,...........'.o...~,.,..'.;,.i.......~..;[,~..i,'.!...li..I.l~..i.. ~~7~~T.j?~x~~t;;~R NAME Town of SouthOld/~~LIA..,.I'<;;.},.J.,_. . '. ,""'v." . . *~~t~~. ::~~~~::T::~(i~~~~hi~~~~~!~~o;~y c~m!~~i~:N~;~~~7.g~1~~:~89~..;;s~~~r:~ "',;;,It" ~Y:;)-..:;"'".'::...--. ~ '," .- ""', -;,,~ .., 'v '~-'. -""~" ' (,-~, ,.~,...) "<":<"1' ~~"..F,~",.,,"-_t......~"+'<}\;::'" . ;1\~"-1fd.~',-:;<,~.,"" .' .... .' c '9~~ ,.,' .',.(;.-..'<"<t,-'./)+,f""~I~Ij,. I . ''''s:~~ "H:"" ( ^",lj"~'''~'t~l'i~~r,;~p'f/,j,~} ',",'..:'7.-!t.~~ . ./.~..t(""'j-'.. . . *-... * * . . . . * . . *' * . . * . * . . . . . * * * * * . . * ,...,"" ,,~~. !;j~:'~~I'DENT' IFICATION "", -.:, < ') ,1-;"1" ~'..i:-l'~) ~'~lt5~y '~'*t.:~(~~~~:'.-A' ~H. ~.,..:...~<\f~": .~." p, ""~ dr".. , ~~'~"-l~;"'''~,;.;.J,~~Ai1..'(''"~'i :~~1h- w:1itt~, :t;,""'~;.;';'~/' . .... ", :...r.v.v.~"t...",~- :.\.'....,,~~),<~.r.,~<J",.. ...;.Ifl,"'~.J;':"'i"'_.'.i...~" {~q~~~..'/,J:lI 'i!,.~:?1~.:tk:w:~~ . 'f;/L BUILDlNG~-t!Errk Capt. Ellsworth Tuthill/Semmer House' "Iris Acres' ,':~~;,',2. COUNTY: u 0 .,..'t""TOWN/CITY:. Southold 'VILLAGE: Mattituck, ,;(1:'\:,-3. STREET LOCATION: WJ.ckham Ave. -.'<.....>;.:. . -""c"""""'"'' ,.,.:,. "':'1;')k\".--:,,,,,"'l(.l>,' 1:::,':,'4."OWNERSHIP: 3. p-UbliC D' -'d~.;-t.~:ht:'''p'rivate 'IX] '~,,~l'/!"!~' .".~~: .:,." r' '~".~.~",.:,Jit,~El~~i;.~lF};if '~A ;f~~40~:~: ~~~SE~~g~~C~t1;~~. ~,~~rg,:!>'C~:~~~~~~:.~r~~~t~SS,: ~~ r~;t~,~~~>!q,~~t~: ,,. 4/ ;"~\t.\>:):AC,C:E~SI,BILlTY TO ~~~~IS.:,JJ~.'J~!e~iOr~V~sjbl~ fro,!,publi~rl)~d: Yes rn ,: No 0 """"~'l :;/,(:~..,.:,;:;,: '" '. . : ;';.'~.;,S.-:.f:'),~l,'.lnlerior accessible: "Explain" By appt . only '~~o\~:~'f'::>~-: :'-: D Ese R I PT. 0 N .: ,::,{,~'~:;,~,l:,-:; :;? ~i.:;;i~::~d,~~~'.~.:_l:::Y::-'-f,j'r'~':-' ,,:: ':~-<~',k~;~,;,~;'>>~;h",:~: . '. ' j, L: ~:\>i .' ,', .'~';j,~' ,~ ':, j,:?,:,:~ ; :_: : ': ~'-' ''','' ; ll. BUILDING' . c1apbuard 6il -',b. slone D::i',c" brick 0 ;.<d. board and batten 0 , ,<;.~ MATERIAL: e. c?bblestone'D ..J.shingl,s Q_.~g:'stucco 0 . o!her:', ..:~.,Y:'.,c :~\'~'~'>',?^',$:!~,.r;,'!~,".f:..~T~;~j:...{;S;-,.::-."'t~:::~:':';~i2~~.--., <, '." ~"v ';' 1. ,.~~'t'.';''''{;'''r .1. wood frame with interlocking joints 0 .,'.:~ ~::<:: '::- :,' ~'.'<" ;'_~ ~t..: ')~~ :~;''!11l:~~ --'l , + "j<;....~.) ~f.':}.' .. .., ~<\ ._,," }" ..'~' . "''''r~':'''' , wood frame with light members OCJ i'~.'i!,~~''''r:;:r~- ~ ~ :~.;:, ~ ,:'''.'J;:1. '.\ 1"-.; ,,;,:r,~"1it.f':. ,~, ' .' 0 ..~; ~-,.eJt-'j. ~ '{*~ ~A."'.'.~" 1-i v ,..,n'. ~:.t!j'9.?"''' c. masonry load beanng walls :;",;\~-!;;~.<f:f:r;~a.f' 'J l-i1:;~ ;,"!'i~ ,~":~ f)'1 .(; ',1':f" . ';"":-:6/~: d. metal (explain) .<" ~ '~.I",,[.~l"",,~""'; "~ r!"':' ,,_,t.; '_' ,/;-;;)';~"'.<,.'::"{'",., .~ e~ other 'i "':-',- ;'.'.<' :.-,','(;:~.~'- ,'~" "'~'; "'~;;:~lt??i,_~';:~:t .' . . 10. CONDITION: ii. exceilenl 0 ,. b. good 29 'c.'fair D",;d>~eterioraled Ot\i,ii:!;iJ.4~jJ;l;~;d~; II. INTEGRITY: ,a. ~riginal site'ID b. moved Difs?":,hen?" .., ..'. ;',-".<,,::!~~"1<:\~:"'; , " __: , '. ." . . . . ,. """~" ""... _.' .,,' ....,.1 _ ,- _." . ',< "':' ,,' ,".. "". . '.~'" ; ,',' '. ,~:,_:~..-I~s.t major alterations and dates. (if- kno~,nt,~ ,:~~!t~-~ _.~ L:" "\.~ ;;v;:r,'f~~~t,;:(i~< ";-:Niv~:&g' -. . . 'Built ,prior ,to 1873, later remOdeled.'"':):i;;'; ". .:' "," "C;:{.' ;\:~,i~,1,~, LLH '1.' '0/ 2'5 ,~.;~;'.;-: ;\'.'::)'\t,:;"::/;,~ ':--,'.;.,"; ,~" ..' ,,'-" "~'. ".~2~~~ .,~~~...,., ~~< '~,.' , ,'-~~ "':_.' ,(}t,.:;:D~~.5~i/ ~,;;'J-~\f!!-' '. :'. _..;.,~,.,'....v.-.,',./."_\',,>,..;.,_. ;':'::;;"',,; ,_,'~....."..~:"..;:;.:_~":... ",j(~,l:'f' -. ",._,_",,,_,"'~..."1!i~. 12.PHoTo:'View fromSlE <:,.. '13. MAP; '~~:J?OT Mattituck Quad! " . ",,~>t"~ ~~ (lD e. ",..., ".1 . ',' . ~ 9. STRUCTURAL SYSTEM: (if kn<wnJ - .o~ .(.~. . .o~/ .~ ., , 10 ,.r .0- " ,,- ~., HP.' 0f) .......... .,' ..~' ~;..:~:',~, :,~. 7~_ ~ '~k~' :~, ~~..:I".:{. :,~;.': ~~;(~~.:~~:~4; ~~~.,t,~t;~~>.~i".~,.t. ;" ' ~ . . . "'.d' )'~i,~~,,~.'i>~;l;':" ';'"' ~".~>...<~~,~(1}~~~;t'\~\'~,-:'I,~~t~~{~J'.::;!,\~~-..."f..... \. l~ ..': ~ <'::'_'~;I:,::.,:;';.~/..::'~::'-' I -~;,' c;.;~'?~~: 3:'1 '.. .~. )" .: . -."">~ ;~. "~'~(t'I;:,",U'~~' t '?i!'t;:;::':i{~h:"~:'{-:, . ,,~ .:::o-,~. - .,', .'. :- -' :.,,>::.;::;Y'[:'::.'f4. THREATS TO BUILDING: '8: ROrie known Kl\b. zoning D'c. roads .::ig~i{i~;~~~\~~~li.~,+;if~<~l~~E;"H' 'M~ij;;:~~:~:~:;~pe.~:.;'8i"<;2:<:..~eleriOration 0 ....,';.:J;l{;\;.:i~~~\:;:;~.1f,;'f:i5.;".REt.KTfD' BUI LDI'N'''G' S 'A"N"D' P'R' OPERTY ., i.H ,.." "",, ".".......,..'''...'..''.'hi',: . ~ ~'.::;/_~:;,},~~ti~-f~-~~:~;~~> J_. ,':;",',: ' . '" .. _ ., _,: -~.~-';~';';":'~')'< ,C,.-""'" ,,'i:~,;;-'::" "-'-','<f c" ~ -'--~:'::t,~1 : ,.,,r ;\'ot,.?'>;;:;;;r.;;y,;,,';';;:1" a. barn 0 . ..',:;;b,.,carnage hou~e 0 . c. garagrO .: :'!i-"': :~_~';.;:i\~j~~,i1~~,~r.~~'1~t:k " ,i[:pri~ 0 ;'~':;e:"she(( [XJ ,'c~,J. greenhouse cr _:t~;~--.:t~~~ :':,~ :'::~;"':}ijj'0;.~~':~;.?f:?:t~~:.:)4,\ ~"'Shop 'd" .~:;},~_ g~r4ens O'! ,-'r,:;,~,:,\;_~'">-;,:~:"':::';:i.>2~r,':- ;,.i'\~'~~;~"~'~,i;:' ..);ti~fu' . .., ..;i,:~~nd~~~P..~J~~cl~res:horse'farm'-":2i horsEH3"" ,?~r~ '. .... ..,;j;Olher:....icehouse .:...0/f.!j~,'j'h(B'uIl.DING' (ch.~f~, rn~r~.t.han()ne if ,~~fes<s~ );..open I~nd ~].,:ti.":l!'w()odlalld q.:# fr~'~ca~!~recl~uildin~ [;J. ;~t:1~1~ j:~~~..ely. buill,ul> 9;l!tt,~ommer~!~1 p .' .i!,duSI~!al, g.$I&.'~~srde,~~!.~.I~, .; . other: .,-::.":>i7~,!",...y:..,~~~~."A'~~~...~l4' '~~.."";.';;.';I;<\.1'ii:,.,.it)l;ilt. ". .- ". ' , _, " ._.':.~,';'Iftji~:'~~<~~tur:-.it"ft\'" " ',', ,;~INTERRELATIONSHIP OF BUILDING 'AND SURROUN i:~!~~~l, ~(Indicale if ,bljilding orslruclure i~ .inanhiSloricdislricl) >-~~~:~':fl;r~;~$, ,,~.~X;&,~.:,~g<~,i::~;;~>Y'~;\~~;~-:~~f~{!~',~':~~~~K~t5~~~:;:;i2i~.~FX':':::':< '1;'?-'..:~;;~ti'li.~t1;_*~~r ~,:2~}i;,:~!(g,..,~~~L..~~~:~~g:~t:t~ickhamJ~<?~d "JS :,,~ .'lo,c~ ._,~71~rie,". " , '~~~l~f~j~~T1%I~~~t[~t~;ft%!~;;,2~"" "t~1;':':~;,( :',;' .' , :~~}~f(,;r~(?f . . .':_"l<":r"';'1J:.':}':~~;n,;." ~""<"';O-~~-,-"-.):_~~3-~-:'jJs'~>""'~f>;"'~' "~~,..$:~~~,J;~'e1~~."'~' ~.-~, >"':J<ij:..Jf~'itf, 1.' ,!, __..",-~, ;'i' ,: ;';~"';~'D;;(i'~;;;':;l'i'bt~ER:NOT ABLEFE"'TliRES;'6)i':~DitDING;ANriSITE .....(ir":lucllrl~int~ri(',;"fealuresrf kn~Wn):' .r.,.'/',-t' f.,.' ,..}'~" .~.:< '-" - . . . .--, _;_:i-:) ,:~.:",:,-, /" "):,':';~",:,;"";;)>~;'~~,-r;-.f,,',;:",._,,,"<.'l!'f ;':::'I-'.,::::,~,'< i\,.:,f~'L':~?'~' ...~-,~io,1,~','"'.);;..~ ,,~,;, ',:'; -:;:,""']~ :;".;.,:_~,~,:~,;,,,,'W~~~"~'1.'~ ~.1'in::_: . ,,));.)t,';..!;'}2~-sto ry ,mul ~i,-gabled ...Queen,Anne:;housewi thoct81ganal jower.:o:n,,:; ';;,,' ...:east-elevationand l-!3:toryoctagonal pavilion with cone shaped,:;!? .>"roof on wesl . ',$hingles balconies on north side . Mainly2!21i'ifl . :..windows.,:Varigatedshingleson gables, bays, towers and.bal7,;i<~) ", . conies. ,Front porch with turned eave brackets. These . brackets' ':;;,\d:ii::'~':SIGNIFICA:NCE'ar"E!"~,~o,,,~!'e.J:1n~,;R? 'l-s~()ry extenfl,ionon north~",;:" ':'~~~':~~~~19.DATE OF INrrlA'CCQNSTRUCTjON:'Prior 'to 1.873 and later enlarge ~~(;~~,~~~,~~~~;;;,;,i~;~;~:'=:"i ,'tit. t'[.,;: ~ O. HISTORICAL AND AR.CHITECTlIRAL IMPORT AN~E;:l,,:~.,g;;9).~'~1::,.;,; '. "',,,,' ',. ;,. "",' "., --~"\r:" " ., ' " ~ ",,",,, In~er-relationshipwith community:. " :';' ',' ~<:::,:;...~.;~:; ,,<' . . "P.',. Ellsworth Tuthill was a well-known ship' s master.'".: u. ge .... ~E,J:.;.. "\;' Tuthill, a Justice of the Peace, held court in:fJ:'gnt:rq6rii';'~~t.; Judge Tuthill gave Wolf Pit Lake and surrounding:J.and'{at,foot.".;.~ of hill on which the. house sits) to Hamlet OfMattitu'cklri"'" ~t 1953.CJl N.S. . . Tuthill in 1909.,'/!t,~!~t,;;:>;:1f~iif~~k" \;;! '.....;.,."'... ',i.'!i:',.J>r:.;',." ,': . "",\';i~';~~.P\""~"~?:':''Fi~J!i';;.ia1RfJ ..."1; ~'f- ~,.- ,,"~' ': . >,:_-.,;~.,,,O~.~;'!?'>r.~ "~'--. ." .J,'~:~~1:-:r~~7:-"~~ -:~r~~~ .;;~ . . ."/ j;\":,}~~~lJ~~i~n,\: ' ';'~fjl~i~~~~~~i . Beers, Coms1iock, Atlas of Long Island:"'lS73. ,;~ . ,_:...[; 21. SOURCES: Judeg Tuthill's records and photographs (1865. photo...;',;:":' shows a 2-story house; 1900 photo shows present Victorian :Hous~) A History of'Mattituck. Long Island. N.Y.. Rev. Charleif'E;7,'Crave. pages 35, 46 and 227. ". :~,'.~J:';'V~~~~rt?l~t" n. THEME: Form preparEld by Linda L. Harvey, ResearC.l}",;f.ss,f~~~an ,>~~ . -~~:~~~~~~"f-.il~'::~ . ~ c . t >',- ';~';}:"~/;~;:~~l~~;~~!i:J'~ ~'~..:;(~ ~ :'-<~!€'~'-':~t.~....tt.-;. ''--',~.....'' ~,"'-, .',',. .~_.- A HISTORY OF ~IXfTI reCK. 227 in I::-:GO, .\""cw Yorks populatiun bad Illore than duubled, ant! L:ro,)klyn's had incrcZlseJ fourfold, tbe h\"o cities h, :cting :11orc than a million people tbat lHU:;t IH..~ fed, E"l'1l this wonderful increase in population doe_" 1I0t give 'lll adequate idea of the rapid incrl'a~c in the dt'l\lalHls of th. city 11larkct, for the increasing \n~alth and pl1rchasillg' pc \\t'r of the cities advanced CyC'n morc rapid!: than the 1 i 'I 'I if II il if f ~,~ll Ii I~E:4IDE="CE OIo~ CAPT. ELLSWOHTH TUTHILL .-\=,D HIS SO=', =,ATHAXIEL ~. 1TTHILL. " 1>' 'pl1latiull. Such a kll1{ltil1g 1I1arket Ilccessanl: led the tanlln..; of eastern Long Island to turn their attention ks~ Il) the (,ld standard crops alld ll111rC tl) the culti\'ation ~-,i \"q.:L'tahlcs ji,r city COTbUlllpti(,Il. It \\'as then fuuml that the ."(lil and cli1l1atic ,clilldiliulls of eastern Suffolk (','11111.\- atYurdcd peculiar a~\(l ul1sl1spected adaptability to the raising uf ct.'rtain yegctahlcs, slIch as putatoes, a~par- A History of ,'iattituck. Lonf! Island. N.Y. 1906. :haI"~e ::' f , , Craven, Rev. "..-.- , Southoli:1 Town Landmarks Preservation Commission, Tmvn Hall, SouttJold. .... IRIS ACRES I'1K-38 (l SEMMER HOUSE OVERLOOKING WOLF PIT LAKE Wickham Avenue, Mattituck Dr. and Mrs. George Semmer, owners Barbara Jacobs, farm manager, 298-8239 12 rooms and bath 3 rooms and bath master bedroom & bath 2 bedrooms and bath watch tower and attic - 1st floor :.. 2nd floor - 3rd floor - 4th floor - 5th floor House has 23 rooms: FIRST FLOOR octagonal ~ off circular driveway massive hardwood moldings hardwood mantle with fluted columns with Ionic capitals and plate glass mirror, in parlor parquet floors elliptical arches separating parlor from dining room and alcove alcove or sun room (once used as a courtroom by Justice of Peace Ralph Tuthill, a former owner ) small octagonal tearoom, now a kitchen - several older rooms belonging to the house when it was double home housing two Tuthill generations butler's pantry woodwork throughout: door lintels with rosettes at eitr end; jambs with vertical molding; charming balustl with intricately turned balusters round cellar with brick walls and concrete floor ~~~ brick lined square cellar furnace room Entrance Living room Cellars . Other floors 2nd floor: 3 bedrooms, full bath 3rd, 4th & 5th floors are half-floors: continued 0ou~~1i101dlo\'ln .Lanamark.. reservation Cor1mission, ~ hall, c,outhold. ... .Semmer house, page 2 i'/IK-3,s @ 3rd floor: up a half-story (note ornate turned balusters) master bedroom, bath with interesting turn-of- century tub and marble lavatory elliptical arch sets off parlor carved hardwood mantle, oval mirror fireplace (closed off) with ornate iton shield manY-Vi ind ow s 4th floor (another half-story) corners of plaster walls highlighted with decorative woodwork - two identical bedrooms small room (or closet) off one bedroom called t "ghost room." The ghost is said to be Nat Tuthill, who plays the flute and makes sme noises. 5th floor widow's walk octagonal tower; three windows with different views ceiling and walls sealed with narrow paneling old chimney flue exposed iron fireplace shield - low relief decoration parquetry on floor Elsewhere on the 70-acre property is an ice house and a large modern sta Once this farm supported 150 cows. Barns burned 13 years ago. Has been a horse farm for the past 3 years - today the farm includes 21 thorobred race horses. PREVIOUS OT,INERS Captain Ellsworth Tuthill c. 1865 Moved here from Hading River Was a ship's master and cattle deale Nat Tuthill c. 1901 Capt. Tuthill's son Nat remodeled the house, adding the top 3 floors, c. 1900 Judge Ralph Tuthill 1950 No relation to the above Tuthills Judge Tuthill was a Justice of the P held court in the house's sunro In 1953 Judge Tuthill gave Wolf Pit Lake, surrounding parkland and road, to Mattituck and the Town George Dickerson Dr. & Mrs. Semmer Note: Judge Ralph Tuthill has two photographs of this house worth noting One, taken some time after 1865, shows the house as a 2-story home The second, taken in 1901, shows it remodeled into a Victorian man 1'; A HISTORY UF MATTlTCCK. "'Ilomas Terell r..rason doc acknollcdgc~ that \Villlam }~ evs <ksese4 did formorl;y purchas J. pasell uf f,;:lltte I' edow or me that did fornDrlIy belong to I~ e but W3S within his the above said Fcevs Range bc- ""~en t~le wollf,~ pit SW;:U\lP and his frconl 1"XIH,ls."* :~!~i~lLr:i~_~.:,Y;l1n~lw a be.illtiful lake on h_l.~j~- !r_QJ__1.i.U?L_1Jl~\~ort:l Ttlthil1-)ocatcs tho:. range of . ':!:Iiam Reeve. This tract or part of it seelll'; In have 1, 'cn o\\'ned by a Danid Eeeve in I73G, but tI~('r\~ ;5 no Tthel tran~ l'j' o\\ncrsh:p until I78~ WhCl Clbadi lh 'L:dsor\+ J.ppcar~ as owner, mortgaging this pr"IH~rty to - Ired Landon and Jc)lltl 'VeIls, Esquir(s, fer the large 1m OJ' t90<I. III the 1l1')rL~agc it is described ;c; "a ccr- t:llI t:.:td I:\'Jildinr;s p<l[ nf ,:h, b loundc( tli,' p, [I ;t I, ~ 1 :'a ]- 1,:5e rht -- ) -' -The lb,)ve i~ quote,1 from lh'~ (Tigin,d j);l.p",r :1 J"i,:S'~~SI,-,n George 1l. Re.:'\-e, "f ~,lattituck. An hb'tracl. vit'!l mor'> thodo::t Sf,elllng, :$ in :-;owho:d Prilltl~d g",:Q'ds, '\- ,)1 [T.. ;:.. 107, iObadlah Hud,;,.n ",as prcbably a ~on 0:' Hlct\a~'d. Si)n of .r 'nathall. of Shelter [."Iand. Hichard was an. eldl'r brilther of ~,!llluel, who Wa!l :he grandfather or DeaC'ln Joserrl. <if Fr:L'nk- in....ille. the great-grandfather of "Wro. ~f. und Jos. };., of Mat- ltuck. Obauiah Idt several ,;hl1dn~n. and hl:-I descendants aI"> umy and hO/lorable. but none is Ilvlnt-: In l\-Iattltuck. Llk,~ ..: hers l)! the re\'{,lutlonary refugees. he sul'fcl'cd flnarl:Ja1 lo~~(:~ ~...')m which he n"Vt'r ro~ci)Ver,'d, and his flne estate wa.'1 $acri- 'ked. He dIed in 1791. His ~on, ObadJah, who married Chloe. !,lught",r of Jon<dhan and C..loe (Gardiner) Pike, llvO'd for n. me in th~ oid h01.lS'.~ near the Lake. 2<1 Obadbh ls said >\ hay,", died at Commac, L. I.. In 18~t), ~rd Oba,:Hah. born :It MattituC'k in 1787, was grandfather ot MI3S Emma 1. Hudson, ,)r PeekskHl, N. Y., to whom the aulhor IB Indebted tor much Hterest:1ng Information concel""ning the flUlllly. A gnllldson or :l:-d Obadiah is ("Jrnm,Lnd,:r Wlltlam Henry Hudson 8outhE'r- 'and, U. S. Navy. Hl~ per!<>rmed consplcuc,us SI!I'vlco In tile .lte SpanIsh wa r, In ('omrnlnd or the "Ea.g1e." In:-lepb, a yr>unger son or 1st Obadiah, b;lpth.:ed in Mutt1tuck In 17i!7, had a ,l.lstlngulshed 8011, CarJtah ~,Vllllam LeVt!rett HudHon, U. S. ~avy, who commanded the "Nlagara," We :Jhtp that laid the A,tlantlc cable In 1.'358. He died In "t'ew York in 1862. T' Th He,'yc n I" ';'71 1111p \", " IS I'; k.~!: , Jo ):;~pi ~ P I ~::), Fe'r a Rev. IUstory of ),1",: .. -~: '\ I' ~ ':i .n6 c.z. Craven, , , .. '. ~ '--;1 . (( r~ \I.-'~c/k.. __ Weekender "7ni?lBetrospe~t. The Legend of Wolf Pit Lake !~ /L - By JOY BEAR. , The year was 1793. The Revolutionary War had been over for 10 years, and the British and Hessian encampment by Lake Marralooka in' Mattituck. was a fading memory. . About two miles north of Lake Marratooka IS a -=i7 smaller like Of fresn wau:c. wmcn m omen oays qIad'e , "tbe area desirable for a homestead. XVilliam Purrier had settled tbere on part of a land grant which had once been . owned by one of his ancestors hack in 1675, In 1793, Purrier was planning a business trip to New York City. Because of tbe difficulties of travel in tbose days, tbe trip would take a montb or lon~er, ~is two older sons, 17 and Ig, were eager to go Wltb hIm, but Purrier was reluctant to leave his wife and two "younger children - Estber, 11 and her younger brotber Sidney _ alone for so long. . "Please do take tbe boys and go," his wife urged. "We will be perfectly safe. We have Enoch and Auntie Hagar" - here she smiled at tbe two old slaves - "and of course we have Bion." The big dog heard his name and wagged his tail. So it was settled. The men had been gone for about three weeks, and were sorely missed. Old Hagar had fried doughnuts in the shape of little men for treats. Uncle Enoch had caught a young fox and was trying to tame it as a pet for tbe children. Time hung heavily... hut tbere was one ' bright spot in tbe week - a Sunday School to be attended every Saturday afternoon. . Dame Phoebe Wickham had started the Sunday ----7 School inner home near Lake Marratooka, in 1793. ADOut 50 Mattituck children attended. The BIble stories were wonderful, and it was good for isolated youngsters to be witb so many children. Estber and Sidney could hardly wait fQj' Saturdays - tbe highlight of tbeir weeks. But on Ibis Saturday, fate intervened. Uncle Enoch was sitting by tbe big kitchen fireplace witb a swollen foot propped up and swatbed in bandagllS. Enoch always accompanied llIe children on tbe tw...mile walk to Dame Phoebe's. But on this weekend it was not to be, The children were steeped in gloom. Estber had persLStenUy urged her mOtber to let tbem go alone, witb tbeir big dog Bion for protection, but Mrs. Purrier kept tbinking of tbe mile of deep, dark woodland A ~,~ 'v -;-;-" - --'. AU9U., 1983 " 'k I / . '_ . 0 Page 15 -'-"l/::::i ,::,0",:;" ~:'\F:r ""::)::i/";';':-; :.).t:iA Mi(. "3 ( G. -t:i:::;<},:::::.:/;:..::;:\ <-o.;;;:""ii?)';$T':'::':':'- tbey had to pass tbrough." . As often happens, tbe children finally had tbell' way. By 11 o'c1ock'tbey were running joyously toward tbe woods, witb Bion barking at tbeir heels. As tbewoods closed around tbern, and a kind of green twilight settled, Bion's barks became a growl. His neck hairs bristled, and he placed himsel! in front of tbe children, and refused to let tbem pass, The underbrush quivered, and two yellow eyes appeared, followed by tbe grisly head of a wolf. The dramatic events tbat followed were sensational enough to give tbe lake tbe name it still bears today, 190 years later-Wolf Pit Lake. . " If you would like to know what happened next, you can read the rest of the story in detail in a little flier researched by Judge Ralph Tutbill Sr., and available at the Mattituck Historical Society on Main Road in Matlituck. Sheila Wirsing is tbe president of tbe society. . . . ,. Is tbe story true? - "I don't know," says Judge Tuthill. who knows the history of Mattituck intimately. "It is said, however, tbat tbe last wolf in tbe area was shot in 1793, near Wolf Pit Lake, which at tbat lime was c1ciSe toa forest." ~~t1. . ,... . ;'<.Ir .',j;- Judge Tutbill once owned Wolf Pit Lake, and lived in tb'-big house on tbe bill overlooking-it. He later gave tbe "'- lake and surrounding land to the M~uck Par~ District. Today skaters and ice-hockey playersm-blight , jacketS glide over its iCe in winter, and old and young enjoy its sunny banks in summer. ' . . . . About tbe house tbe Purrier children were walkinll to, when tbey encountered tbe wolf, Judge Tutbill was more positive: 101 remember it before it was tox:n down in 1920,'" he recalls. "It was on Main Road, just west of tbe Mattituck . High School, and one of thi~ country's first sunday ~ schools was organized in it. r uaUlI: Phueoe Moore Wickham. who opened the Sunday School in 1793, was the 17th child of Micah Moore. and had been married to Joseph P. Wickham for only two years when she started her Sunday School... and Sunday schools bave continued in Matlituck _ and over the worJd -ever sincel" / ~/!-f () "1"+ - 1940 Landmark Listing I , I I , I I I MATTITUCK (Continued) JONATHAN HOWELL. Patriot. Western Mattituck. Route 25. JUDGE JOHN WOODHULL'S HOMESTEAD. Western Mattituck. Route 25. OLD MATTITUCK CEMETERY. A t Crossroads in village. SITE of the OLD TAVERN. Village center. Route 25. JOHN CLARK. Ran the Old Tavern. ViJlage center. DAVID GARDINER. Eastern Mattituck. Near Manor Hill. Opposite Eli- jah's Lane. Route 25. DR. JOHN GARDINER. Eastern Mattituck. Near Manor Hill. Opposite Eli- jah's Lane. Route 25. THE REEVE HOMESTEAD SITE. ViJlage center. Route 25. BARNABAS WINES - 2nd & 3rd. Eastern Mattituck. Route 25. Elmer Ruland's prop- erty. IVY HOLLOW. Northville Turnpike. West Mattituck. JOSEPH GOLDSMITH. Blacksmith. Village center. Opposite church. DEACON THOMAS REEVE. Village center. Corner of turn. Route 25. HOME SITE of BARNABAS TERRILL. Village center. Next to Reeve Homestead. HOME of MATTITUCK'S FIRST SUNDAY SCHOOL. Frank Tuthill's property. Route 25. GARDINER'S or DEEP HOLE CREEK. New Road through back lots. THE OLD CORWIN HOUSE. Eastern Mattituck. Route 25. jABEZ MAPES. Mapes' Neck. Western Mattituck, off Bay Boulevard. COX'S NECK. Borders Mattituck Creek. THE COLEMAN LOT. _____ Eastern Mattituck. . f _______ WOLF PIT. LAKE.' Where wolves were baited. d- Small lake at Nathaniel Tuthill's place. ""4 SITE of the KIDD OAK. . Near Breakwater. On Long Island Sound. MARRATOOKA LAKE. Route 25. SOUTH OLD PHILEMON DICKERSON. Master Tanner West end of village. Route 25. WILLIAM PURRIER. Formerly of Hashamommock. West end of vill~ge. Route 25. THOMAS MAPES. Formerly of Hashamommock. Town Surveyor. . CUTCHOGUE STRAWBERRY NECK. Robinson's Hill. Ea.t of Village. Route 25. FRESH MEADOWS. East of village. Route 25. WICKHAM'S CREEK. INDIAN CAMP. Of fifteen of them about town, this one, seat of the Sagamores, is the principal camp. Lower part of John Downs' farm. . THE SWEATING CAVE. On new road through the back lots. THE INDIAN FORT. Fort Neck. MAPES' SCHOOL. Still Standing. Eastern Cutchogue. Route 25. JAMES LANDON SCHOOL. Route 25. THE OLD HOUSE. Dedication, during the Tercentenary Celebration. Cutchogue Village. Route 25. NEW SUFFOLK DAVID TUTHILL'S FARM. All of New Suffolk. Here John P; Holland perfected his submarine. On Waterfront. Goldsmith & Tuthill's docks. THE DAM MEADOW. Off New Suffolk Avenue. PECONIC "THE CASTLE." Colonel Samuel Hutchinson. West of Peconic Lane. Route 25. INDIAN NECK. Orchard of the Indians. On Peconic Bay. South of Route 25. GOLDSMITH'S INLET and GRIST MILL. On Long Island Sound. PETER DICKERSON. Skunk Lane. -< o I-' H, >d f-'. ct to-' PJ ". <1l J ~ ~~ . , -, . . MIi::'?~ ( .....,............ ~Up~I"VIMJl JUlI; 0I0U- U, ".,...................._. ."_ . . i '.' ~~ - . ,- "" ... - , - ... , .. . ,.;-. ".-....., "'- - - ..... ... ..' .. -"\ ~ .. ~ .. . ...,."'.,...."'._....,- '. ... J * ~..~ ,iff ....',; . - Trauler.Watdo..II/Palll DIt_ltry Bred To Run With The Best MAITITUCK - Running with the look of the champions they may one day become, the four young fillies at Iris Acres showed their stuff the other day. They ran, darted and kicked in a playful exhibition. seemingly unaware of the serious work that Jay ahead in their lives as racehorses. The times. all one.year"Old standardbreds. or yearlings, wiJI begin to learn this year the technique of pulling a two-wheel- ed manned cart around a race- track. As either trotters or pacers, depending on the footwork they Use, - they'll soon enter the world of harness racing. And along with other young horses still grazing and frolicking in other pastures. they'll compete for millions of dollars of prize money in a sport that. more and more, is touching the open fields of eastern Long Island. ------~--_'''- / Iris Acres, a 70-acre sprea~ State, there are about six stand. that once belonged to Judge I ardbred farms throughout Long Ralph Tuthill, a former town/ Island; together with the more ustlce, IS on....~e_e:!'t_B:nda;,!1. numerous thoroughbred farms. , br s to open on ~aster!1 they make Suffolk County of New ~ng Islan-d - 10 re.~_eE:t. _ ye~r~~__ York's most horse-populated re- "AcCOrd1Og folherIarness Horse- gions. (Of thoroughbred (arms, breeders Association of New York Suffolk's 41 make it the second Fillies show off their running ability at the Iris Acres standardbred farm in Mallituck. ;' ~ " '1L I ll'''~ f/ I! '-L I?-l U tk~" ii' '. ....,u. . Cf- / 'I 2;~ "J.-.. / ,i ~/ " , . -..,...... 1'1\ It. ...~ 6 @ 'l-,,"~,;~;t~~'~",~lo~':~~_ /' ....-.'. -. ~'~....,.;;;: Bred (c:onlinued ftom Page I) in; officials say, which in tUrn 'attract more .breeding farms. "'New York is either the largest [in breeding standardbreds], or the second largest to Dllnois." says Charle's Knauss. executive director of the Agricuhure and New York State Horsebreeding Fund. an agency that promotes hotseradog. Since 1960, when standardbred racing and breeding in New York became organized. the number. of statewide broodmares has risen from 247 to over 4,000. In addition. prize money has jumped from a total of 5245,000 in the first "sire stakes" standardbred races of 1961. to over 57 million in 1982. In more recent years there has been separate money for breeders too-IO ,percent of the winnings or up to 51.000. With the addition of ,the Mea- dowlands racetrack in New Jersey to the several other facilities in metropolitan New York, this surge in the industry has appar. entiy yet to peak. "There's always room for more horses." says Knauss. And the place where morc and more horses are being bred is eastern Long Island, "Long Is. land is developing into a great (horsebreedingl ~dustry, " says. Olarles Russo, executive secre- tary of the Harness Horsebreed- ers Association. The Island's 'advantages to breeders, according to Russo and Knauss, are its'mild winters and good pasture land, not to mention its proximity to tracks. Although standardbred breed- ing farms have not developed as quickly on Long Island as thor- oughbreds, which include among their ranks the "Big E" in Laurel. standardbreds are expected to blossom. A primary reason is the state's sire stakes, which grants entry only to' those horses who, were sired by a New York stallion. Moreover, Long Island is an~easy A separate washdown area has drive from sire stakes In' New both hot and cold running water Jersey. where'the cash winnings to allow wintertime bathing. On are also big. The winner of the the alldlng door to each stall Woodrow Wilson Pace for two- hangs a purple bucket. above year-olds. for ,Instance. takes which is a hand-made Iron grat- home SO percent of a 52 mUlion lng, The barn. says Richard Tar. pot. And then there's the 51 antino, who manages the farm, million Meadowlands Pace for was basically buBt for looks. but three-year-olds. One' of the four also for convenience and comfort. yearlinga at Iris Acres, Princess I. Tarantino, a 24-year-old horse who was sired by B.G..'s Buddy In trainer and breederwbo has been New Jersey. will probably try nut in the business half his life, says for the Woodrow Wilson nelE! he is prepared to board several R J'. ' year. more horses immediately. even if eattors Iris Acr...!.s, a picturesque place it means building another barn. (Conytfu'ed from p4e 1) Wlm rollmg fencec! pastures that In. the mean!ime,. as ~e lives on lana is already' SUbdi~, ided . b lead to Mattituck' Sou d s Iris Acres with hIS WIfe. Donna.. "...6nce-acre ......6ts wo ld . ; m eventuilly have as many as and four-month..old daughter. '''b 'nz4 b d u J?Y 30 to 3S horses, In addition to the Tracy, he'll go about the chore of o':t. eyon J:belr wildes four yearlings. which the owners fencing in the still-open half of drea / as theY,/'look control. 0 h 70 Ee ast tr f land on Whld intend to keep as their own t e acres. bl' I f .-r,- fi b d H 'I' fro b b N ea e 0 .acre smg e-Iamu- racehorses, it now has ve roo - allng m ~u ur an ,ew omes be'~bu' t(' On: mares. three of which are expect- Jersey. the Tarantmos are haVIng e b f th tt h , b'rth h" d' t I" . i m m 0 e co 1 ee a ed to give 1 t IS spnng, to a JUst 0 lie m an area as rura I / . h N h F k "I' wild 2Eso oted that:: y of those I. Operating as a broodmare sta- as t e ort or. t s a er- . . . .....;;: .. T . . 0 Ihon to e upzonlng...,.rw tion-the mares are trucked up' ness area, Mrs. arantmo saId bl h ~t t' I~"'" h . a y ave ~res s m ~ t a state to be artificially Insemin. last week. as her husband, dress-. t bd' 'd d / ated-lris Acres cares for its ed in creased black slacks and a IS ADO Y/de. SUt IVl ~....:~ i . I h. .. ccor 109 0 a COI.Ulty p anmn. mares during and after preg- purple ve our s Irt, walked qUlck- om" I h 'th ff ' I b h. d h f '1' I ~a, owever,' e e ect/o nancy, and for rolts and fillies y e m t e amI y s own p ea- JP" . " t _-L-I . 5, zonmg I~no necespn y until they reach the age of one sure horse. .. henanagms." as .+ J/. he rodded 'It to trot, one of deva/l gland. areast nc and a half. at which time they're P, over the IllDg term, Arthur KUD7 sent off to be trained and sold as As a family In the horsebreed. . ta-' d'rect ./ f h Lo , b' h T' assts ~ 1 0[,,/0 ten racehorses. 109 usmcss. t e arantmos ap- Isl erR' aI PI . B :rl The farm was resurrected from pear to be due for more company a~ th egl0n't ann.lDg o~trh. I I b f' 'I . th . says at ~as UDzonlDR on former, potato and ast year Y 0 slml ar mterest. as e mcrease ~t E d II d'li' II~ I Dr J 5 ch'" h f Lo n,astralon~su; , erry emer, a psy latnst m orse arms on eastern ng ed' hId 1 Th from Nassau~ounty. and his Island continues. According to .ID Ilgl er . an b /vad ues. . wife. Iris. Its focal point Is ~ new... Russo. of the Horsebreeders As- . re a affnortmn2, oSar .h~ll'd1"'rt h' b ' hi' , h in JiPZOnmg e s m out 0 an W Ite am wit ~rp e mm. a soClahon. an even s arper -/0iIiei t ~d' ._--~~ classy modem edl Ice that Steals crease could occUr if existing ~~lle,r ~_wlns_a!.~..~~~o' ak ft ~sse t e ueve opment 1''"' the glory away from the once farmers here were to tea er ' - - f I d --- --" - maanifil"fI!nt Tuthill farm house.' many of their colleagues in other ~ure n d a~ an '--'~ ~~g the deteriorated walls of whIch parts of the state. /, DZld a ml s ,t lalt upzonln , Th b " f h d d rcou (evenlUa y) encouraw are half enCIrcled by a weedy and e egmnmg 0 t e stan ar - b 'Id' / .. .. . f b d h'd ,more UI mg, / cracked cement path mstead 0 re era. e sal ,was spurreo on /' the canopied driveway of long after troubled dairy fanners were u -,,' t th t' t H . d 'all f.-u- no es a 10 s amptl~ ago. coD.VInCe totranSler or .part 0 .Jo~n's Hither Is area,..-ti The c.ustom-ma~e barn has a their land to the breeding of same two-ac parcels that us.;: dozen hIghly ~amlshed, 12-sqAt, racehorses. Nearly all standard- to sell fo about 560,000 undo cedar stalls. eight of whIch can be bred breeding farms upstate. he hatf-a. zoning nOW go for abcV opened up to' four of double size adds. are somehow related to 575))00 under two-acre l(ining to accommodate mares giving dairy farms-many of them still "/southold'stwo.acre ~oning pr . birth. At the bam.s middle is a coexisting on the same property. posal was introduc.ed two ":~. uncemented brick-floored aisle Russo suggests the same could ago by.councilman John NiCkle illuminated by a center skylight. happen on the East End, where al~/a I()(.'al ryaltor. wtfu stip / - / potato' growers in particular ha.v,: 'been in a serious fmandal de' cline. "Just put up a barn, and you're in the harness business-stU: grow potatoes too," he sayso Then of course there is the pric,: nf a racehorse, which, dependin. _on how much one wants to spend~ can range between a few hundre,. dollars to several hundred thous- and. -Paal Demel) l / 1L{U,~lj^-- ;'1,;{c Jr-el, ,-_~./UL-<.A- t//7/Y:3 . . WOLF PIT ASSOCIATES P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 September 11, 1986 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Sirs: Please find enclosed twelve prints of the Wolf Pit Associates cluster subdivision plan wnich has been revised as per your request. ~~~~~lY~ ~bsa1and DJS:m1 Encs. \" \Cj~Y.> st? ~ . . T LD Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 22,1986 David J. Saland c/o Wolf Pit Associates P.O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 Re: "Wolf Pit Associates" Cluster subdivision Dear Mr. Saland: Please let this confirm the request of the Planning Board, at the regular meeting of October 20, 1986 regarding the above mentioned proposal. It was the consensus of the Board to recommend, following a field inspection, that the layout of the proposed subdivision be re-drawn to open up the North-east and area just north of the proposed road in order to provide a vista to the open space. It was also recommended that if the lots are deeper and narrower along Mill Lane, there will be more open space along the road to provide a vista of the open space for the community. Enclosed, for your review, is a copy of the survey marked with the Board's recommendations. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, ~ (fjrW0U4/}~dAA BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD enc. By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 " August 26, 1986 Mr. David J. Saland Wolf pit Associates P.O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 Re: Wolf Pit Associates Dear Mr. Saland: The Planning Board reviewed the survey for the above mentioned subdivision at the August 25, 1986 meeting. It was noted that the cluster computations seem to be in error since the LILCO easement was not deleted from the total gross acreage. (See Section 100-136 A (1).) Would you please review this and revise the survey accordingly. Would you also forward six (6) revised surveys; upon receipt of them, we will place this matter on the next available agenda. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, 'BLY1hdf Slv /J5l<J:>4 Cfv cLr)JY BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary - T ~ . Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July 10, 1986 Mr. David J. Saland Wolf Pit Associates P.O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 Dear Mr. Saland: We have received the materials in regard to the cluster subdivision of Wolf Pit Associates, however, the check for the filing fee seems to have been omitted. Would you please send this to us. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, , ~ ~Vf~ ohv.)u, r. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD /'hAJ . By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary . . WOLF PIT ASSOCIATES P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 July 11, 1986 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Sirs: Please find enclosed our check no. 114 in the amount of $370 which represents the filing fee for the Wolf Pit Associates cluster subdivision at Mattituck, New York, as per our letter of July 9, 1986. Sincere1v, ~~~ General Partner DJS:ml Ene. . . WOLF PIT ASSOCIATES P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 JUL 1 G t:l86 July 9, 1986 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Sirs: Please find enclosed the fOllowing in regard to the cluster subdivision of Wolf pit Associates at Mattituck, New York. 1) Application for Approval of Plat 2) Legal description of property 3) Short Environmental Assessment Form 4) Check in the amount of $370 which represents filing fee of $50 + $5 per acre 5) Twelve prints of survey 6) Disclosure Affidavit The application for approval of plat does not indicate the Liber, page number and date deed was filed or the Liher and page number of the mortgage recorded. The property was purchased in mid May and this information is not available to us at this time. When we receive the filed deed and mortgage back from the County Clerk we will advise you immediately. Sincerey, ~O'sa and General Partner Wolf Pit Associates DJS:ml Encs. CC: Sebastian Navarra, Esq. Inr~._ of NetI} Yori " ~:t[llf,.. ........ ~~ "'-'. .....''''A....._ .'8~". "'->:.... ~ .\~~.H"~, -'" ~r- . "'.. '~ ~ . -,-," <, '..- .......,;~. . ",j:..-. .r""':"'~ ~:~ TltleNo,632-S-0180 amended Parcel B SCHEDULE A JUL 1 vbd6 All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument on the:northerly line of the "Old Road" 291.89 feet westerly along said northerly line from Mill Lane, said point of beginning being the southwesterly corner of land of Br.ockbank; from said pOint of beginning running along said northerly line and along the nofthwesterly and then the westerly line of said "Old Road" four courses: 1) South 35 degrees 54 minutes 38 seconds West 66.85 feet; thence 2) South 9 degrees 6 minutes 18 seconds West 120.34 feet to a monument; thence 3) South 6 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East 78.51 feet to a monument thence 4) South 10 degrees 23 minutes 52 seconds East 158.05 feet to land now or formerly to Mattituck Park District; thence along said land, three courses: 1) South 78 degrees 6 minutes 48 seconds West 24.26 feet; thence 2) South 42 degrees 59 minutes 38 seconds West 732.17 feet; 3) thence South 39 degrees 37 minutes 22 seconds East 128.46 feet to the Westerly side of Wickham Avenue (Middle road-CR 27); THENCE along said Westerly line, South 52 degrees 6 minutes 54 seconds The policy to be issued under this report will insure the titie to such buildings and improvements erected on the premises which by law constitute real property. FOR TOGETIfER with all the right, title and interest of the party of the first party. of, in and to the land lying CONV6~~C'NG in the street in front of and adjoining said premises. Page 2 . . ~. ~TDC;. .rxIT"~' .~I. ~ ...~~ ~Tf,JJ"Uruncer .~c,.,."...w...,,- of New l'Ork \ ~ \. \) \<jro~~ ~'0 . Title No. SCHEDULE A _~-,-,2.~ "'1 632-5-0180 amended Parcel B West 20.01 feet; to land now or formerly of Frances A. Tutnill; THENCEcalong other land now or formerly of Frances A. Tuthill, Ralph W. Tuthill,sr., Ralph Tuthill,jr., Frances Tuthill, Dean F. Tuthill, and Lois T. Herr, the~foLlowing two courses: 1) North 39 degrees 37 minutes 22 seconds West 613.76 feet; thence 2) South 83 degrees 6 minutes 38 seconds West 298.19 feet to ordinary " high ~ater mark of Long Creek; THENCE Northenly along the following six tie lines following the approximate high water mark of Long Creek; 1 ) North 16 degrees 45 minutes 36 seconds East 90.50 feet; and 2) North 16 degrees 33 mi:nutes 51 seconds West 132.89 feet; 3) North 3 degrees 57 minutes 22 seconds East 162.19 feet; 4) North 53 degrees 08 minutes 13 seconds West 51. 23 feet; 5) Norht 23 degrees 04 minutes 15 seconds West 115.25 feet; 6) North 31 degrees 56 minutes 51 seconds East 67.05 feet to a point; THENCE along said land now or formerly of Grace L. Schantz the following five (5 ) courses and distances: 1 ) North 62 degrees 03 minutes 19 seconds East 489.40 feet to a monument; 2) North 31 degrees 24 minutes 41 seconds West 8~99 feet to a monument; 3) North 32 degrees 30 minutes 51 seconds West 209.52 feet-:to a monument; 4) North 28 degrees 47 minutes 12 seconds West 220.92 feet to a monument; 1be policy to be iuued under this report will inaure the title to such buildinp U1d Improvements erected on the premiles which by law constitute real property. . ~_.. FOIt' TOGE11fER with all the right, title and Interest of the party of the Ilrst party, of, in U1d to the land Iylna co~~~ In the street In front of and adjoinina aaid prerrWeL . .- _...:~" .r'f,TSl AmenCan -.r7iUe In8U1'lLnCe- (;ompany of New York -~ , Tille No. SCHEDULE A Parcel B 5) North 30 degrees 31 minutes 51 seconds west 907.98 feet to a monument on the southerly line of Mill Road: THENCE along said southerly line the following two courses and distances: 1) North 71 degrees 19 minutes 49 seconds East 475.19 'feet to a point: 2) North 67 degrees 05 minutes 09 seconds East 323.41 feet to the intersection formed by the southerly side of "Mill Road" and the westerly side of "Mill Lane": Thence along said westerly line the following two courses and distances: 1) South 32 degrees 54 minutes 52 seconds East 1199.69 feet: 2) South 32 degrees 26 minutes 2 seconds East 1087.63 feet to a monument and land now or formerly of Fanning: Thence along said land of Fanning and land now or formerly of Brockbank south 57 degrees 25 minutes 18 seconds West 283.83 feet to a monument: thence South 57 degrees 25 minutes 18 seconds West 266.67 feet to a point: thence south 32 degrees 34 minutes 42 seconds East 150.00 feet to a point: thence north 57 degrees 25 minutes 18 The policy to be issued under this report will insure the title to such buildi"lls and improvements ereeted on the premises which by law constitute real property. .- --.., FOR TOGETHER with all the right, title and interest of the party of the first party, of, in and to the land lying CO~J~ in the street in front of and adjoining IBid premises. Page 2 . ,". ~"'''f~:', ;~:, of New York - - ~W'" t- , Title No. SCHEDULE A minutes 42 seconds east 152.17 feet to a monument at the point or seconds East 266.67 feet to a point: thence south 32 degrees 34 place of BEGINNING. 1be pollc:y to be iuued under this report wiD insure the title to such buildinp and improvements erected on the premises whi<:h by law constitute real property. . FOil TOCE11fER with all the nlbt, title and Interest of the party of the lint party, of, in and to the land Iyinll ~J~ING In the street In front of and adjoininll said premises. Pop 2 . --- . . APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: 'JU\.. 1 ~ \S~~ The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) UHm~ approYa] "hi suhdh'ision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application. the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be ... .1-79.1f. .p;i:~. A~!'l.9,..:i,?~~!'l.................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "Au hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held hy the applicant under deeds recorded 111 Suffolk Countv Clerk', oiiice as follows: Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ......................., Liber ........................ Page ...................... On . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liber ........................ Page ...................... On . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ........................ I~iber ........................ Page ...................... On . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . as devised under the Last 'Vill and Testament of ....................................... or as distributee ......................... .............................................. .......................................... .............................................. S. The area of tbe land is ....?A ,A62,R.... acres. Ii. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid ~ ............ ........................................................................................ 7. Tbe land is encumbered by mortgage (s) as follows: ..............-.........................................-.... (a) I\.Iortg-age recorded in Liber .............. Pag-e ............. . . . . . in orig-inal amount of $. 6.~~.( ?qO... unpaid amount $ . ?4.0 r.noo........... 'held by ~T.~:r.:r:v. .'!?-.rt:i.~. .~~)'ler & Iri" s... S.em<;:r.. ... address ..~~..~:::q:,.l~..:'li'lc('!!.. R()c!<v:i.~~.e. ~~!,.1;~.:r:! ..N~.,,:. ~.,r.~. 11579 (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page ....................... in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. held hy ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. address ................. .............................................. "'--,,' , . ~ . I . - I . - . - (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $...................... held by ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' add ress .........,...................................... 8. There arc no other encumbrances or liens against the landX~~ ........................ ........................................................................................ - - - . ........................................ ............................................. 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts ... .R~.!'!:j.4~At:j..q;t. .J!.R~9............. - - 10. :\0 part of the land lies under water whether tide water. ~tream. pond water or othenvise, ~ ii ~x.................................................................................. ~ ~ 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improyements. 12. The land (~ (does not) lie in a \Vater District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis. . 'f . h' D' ., N/A tnct, 1 WIt In a lstnct, 15 .......-.......... = . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13. \Vater mains will be laid by .... NIl\................................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ..... LJY,Co. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by . . .~/~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and la) (no) charge will be made for installing said mams. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets 1t1 the Suffolk County High\vay ~ystem. annex Schedule "E" hereto, to show same. . 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southnlcl Highway system, annex Schedule "e" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing- buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. \Vhere the plat shows proposed streets \\. hich are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions ,vith the proposed street5. 20. In the course of these proceedings. the app licant will oiicr proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the I{eal Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots 5howi:J~ all rC'strictions, covenants. etc. Annex Schedule "D". -. -~ ~; . . 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will h~ $. . . . . . . . .. as itemized in Schedule liE" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of th(' Performance Bond be fixed at . . . . . . . . . . . . .. years. The Performance Bond ,viII be written by DATE a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Sched Ie "F". ~:lS:J../ .'...................... (Signature and Title) ~f' (Address) STA TE OF :\EW YORK, COUl\'TY OF .:5. y..tlq.l./c;-, . .. .. .. .. .. ., ss: On the ...... 9. .'~~. . . . . day of. . -;>. <:-!.I 1-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " 19 .l?C?, before me personally came .~.: .~ . . . ."':! : . . s.~ {C?:-. ~. ~. . . . .. . to me known to be the indh-idual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowled g-ed that .. i? .~. . . executed the same. .... 0-~;;.~.v/0f!0:k Notary Public Y ". '( . -:rSl! 7- .. -..... . .......~~ If' ST.\ TE OF XEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ss: On tbe ................ day............ of .... .. .. . .. . ", 19......, beforc me personally came . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to me known. who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No. ................................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. that .......................... is the .......... of ........................... ............................................... the corporation described in and which executed the forcg'oing- instrument; that ............ know~ tht' seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpo~ation. and th:lt ............ signed.............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public ................................ .... . . WOLF PIT ASSOCIATES C/o Saland Real Estate, Inc. Main Road Jamesport, NY 11947 \~ ~~~ ~~\.. . , ~ ". Southold Town Plannning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Disclosure Affidavit Dear Sirs: Please be advised that the names, addresses and percentage of ownership in Wolf Pit Associates cluster subdivision are as follows: Name Address Percentage of O,,,nership David J. Saland Main Road 10% Jamesport, NY 11947 Albert Blasen 8923 Ridge Blvd 10% Brooklyn, NY 11209 Warren Kessler 152 Homestead Road 10% Oakdale, NY 11769 Sebastian Navarra 19 East Ninth Street 10% New York, NY 10003 Kerry Navarra 19 East Ninth Street 5% New York, NY 10003 Brian Mullen 19 East Ninth Street 5% New York, NY 10003 Luis San Andres P. O. Box 329 34% Jamesport, NY 11947 Arthur Curcillo 270 Edgewood Avenue 4% Oakdale, NY 11769 Mitchell Skrzypecki 60 Daly Court Riverhead, NY 11901 4% Richard Curvello P. O. Box 15 Hinesburg, VT 05461 4% :. t . Southold Town Planning Board Page 2 Name Address Percentage of Ownership Douglas Vene 37 Three Sisters Road St. James, NY 11780 4% There are no other ownership interests in Wolf pit Associates. blEJ:~al= General Partner Wolf pit Associates DJS:ml