Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-107.-2-4TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL ~YSTEM ROAD TYPICN_ PLOT PLAN 50668 s.{' steS~e~ F°;or rov~ 60400 SITE DATA= I.TOTAL AREA = 167768 S.E OR 3.8514ACRES 2.TOTAL NO. OF LOTS = .5 3. ZONING USE DISTRICT= 'R-40' RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA NOTE, TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HE~EON IS FROM "TOPOGRAPHIC MAP- FIVE EASTERN TOWNS- PREPARED FOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. NOTE A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTION HAS FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE IN LIBER 11122 CP 65. SEEN THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT COMPLY WITH THE BTANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, HOWARD W. YO~'NG, N,Y.S. L,S, LIC. NO. 45895 " [ HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON THIS PLAT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. " "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY US FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED JULY 24. ISSS AND THAT ALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS= · HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS CORRECTLY SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS ARE CO ECT." HOWARD W. YOUNG.U~/,Y.'S. L,S, LI . NO, 458BS T 0 CERTIFY THATT IS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS SEEN APPROVEDSY OF LDSY UTI ND TED , THE PLANNING SOARS THE LOT LINES OF SUBDIVISION MAPS AS FILED. CANNOT BE ALTERED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNINS BOARD, AND LOTS MUST BE SOLS AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION MAP. NOTE; I.SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DIST. lO00 SECI 107 ELK 2 LOT4 OWNER: GREGORY & GAETANA F SIMONELLI C/O GARY FLANNER OLDEN ,ESQ. HAIN ROAD P.O. BOX 706 CUTCHOGUE, NY IISS5 SUBDIVISION MAP GREGORY SIMONELLI AT MATTITUCK TOWN OF SUFFOLK SOUTHOLD COUNTY, N.Y. $OUIHOLD TOWN ~ PLA__...NNI_. LXlG BOARD AO00GTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERHEAD, N,Y. ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.Y.S.P.E. G L,S. LIC. NO. 12845 HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y,S. L.S, LIC. NO. 4589S THOMAS C. WOLPERT. N.Y,S. P,E. LIC. NO, 6lAGS NAS PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 September 12, 1995 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Gary Flanner Olsen, Esq. P.O. Box 706 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Minor subdivision for Gregory Simonelli SCTM# 1000-107~2-4 Dear Mr. Olsen: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on September 11, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated December 27, 1994. Conditional final approval was granted on April 10, 1995. All conditions have been fulfilled. Enclosed please find a copy of the map which was endorsed by the Chairman. The mylar maps, which were also endorsed by the Chairman, must be picked up at this office and filed in the office of the County Clerk. Any plat not so filed or recorded within sixty (60) days of the date of final approval, shall become null and void. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward /~ Chairman cc: Tax Assessors Building Department THIS MINOR SUBDIVISION IS FOR __~ [' MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) Complete application received _ LOTS ON 2,~g£ ACRES LOCATED ON Application reviewed at work session Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised submission received Sketch plan approval -with conditions Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewe'll location Notification to applicant to include on final map Sent to County Planning Commission ReceiPt of County Report Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval Final Public Hearing e'.~l~ Approval of subdivision -with conditions nuor~cment of subdivision APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: ' The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentailve) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance ~vith Article 16 of the To~vn La~v and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold To~w~ Planning Board, and represents and states as follo~vs: 1. The applicant is the oxvner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . .[~i.q~r.$1,1b.c~J.¥.i.S.qo..fp.P. Gregory Sim0nel I i .._ 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk Count}, Clerk's office as follows: Liber ..1.%048 ................. Page . 186 On . Liber ........................ Pag'e ...................... On Liber ..................... Page On Liber ........................ Page ........... On Liber ....... Page ........... On as devised under the Last \Vill and Testament of ....................................... or as distributee .................... , ......................................... 5. The area of the land is ..2:85i4 ......... acres. 6. Ail taxes which are liens on the land at the (late hereof have been' paid except ............ ......................................... 00D.e. 7. The land is encnmbered by .................. mortg'age (s) as follows: ............................................ (a) Mortgage recorded in ]~,ib.e~ 7~81 -~^ Pa~e 476 a,s assigned by Liber 18/15'page'/bo .... , ................... in oriKina1 amount nt$:[6.,.0O0~00.., nnpa{d amonnt $ ' held ~Em~'re Financial Cnt:.p 0rat J. 00. address (b) ~fortgage recorded in Liher . ]~17.21. Paffe 044 · ' ....................... in original amonnt of 20~000:00.... uupaid amonnt $ ...................... held hy .. [~.~.o.k..o.f...N.e.w. .............. address ............................................................... (c) 1V~ortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ........ :-; ............ held by ...................... ...................... address ................................ . ......................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ........................ ............ none 9. The land lies in the follo~ving .zoning use districts ....................................... ...... -R-40. ~e$.ide~H~l.... "' 10. No part of the land lies uuder water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept ......... 0o/'te .............................................................._ ....... I1. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (ct~) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is 13. \Vater mains will be laid by ....irld.i.¥10oo} .w~-l.}$ ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by L'}bC0 ................................... llnes. · ............. and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said 15. Gas mains will be installed by ..... i~c(e8 ............................... and (a) (no) charge will be ma for installlng said mains. ' ................. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk Comity Ififfhway system, amlex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. ~ g~x~x~e~ none 17. ~ streets shown ou the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in tile Town of Southold lHghwav svsten, annex Schedule"C', ' hereto to show same. 18. There are no ~9~ktt~t~i~ngs or structures ou the laud which are uot located aud shown ou the plat. 19. \Vhere the plat shows proposed streets which are exteusions tff streets ou adjoiuing sub- d/vision maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of tile streets on said ~xisting maps at their conjtmctions w/th the 1)roposed streets. 20. Iu tile conrse of these proceedings, the alq)lic:mt will offer prollf of title :ts required by Sec. ,335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy- ~ff proposed deed for lots shoxvin;,~ all restrictions, covenants, etc. :Mmex Schedule "D". DATE 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will he $ ..... 0 .... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at ............ years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Sch~ ...... vl.U.]/7.2.5. ................ 19 94 .................. t~n~re an~x Gary FLanner 01sen,Att0rney (Address) STATE OF NEx, V YORK, COUNTY OF ...... 51~f.f.01 k ................... ss: On the ...25 ............. day of ....... '.JULY. .................. 19 .... 9.4 before me personally came ............. l~ary. ,~.L antler..0~4o[I ......... to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that .... he ...... executed the same. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ....... . ................... On the ................ day ............ of .............. , 19 ...... , b?fore me personally came ........................ to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No ..................................................... ................................. that .......................... is the .......... the corporation described in and which executed thc foregoing instrun~ent; that ............ knows tile sea!, of said corporation; that the seal affixed hy order tff thc board of directors of said corporation. and th:tt ............ signed .............. name thereto hy like order. Notary Pnblic 4-16-2 (2/87)-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A SEQR State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help aPplicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project yr, action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- there are aspects of a proiect that are subiective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware the question of significance, of the broader concerns affecting The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a proiect or action. Full IAI: Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a proiect or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: !f any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the ~mpact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this proiect: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 I-]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a signif'icant ~ffect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFO,..dA.,ON Prepared by Proiect Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered~," as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona[~. information you believe wilt be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on. information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION M~a~:Subdivison Gregory SimonellJ LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Grand Avenue, Mattituck, N.Y. NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR G~ry Ftann~r 01~en. Esq.attornev for Greqory Simone111 ~DDRESS P.O. Box 706 CITY/PO Cutch0gue, NAME OF OWNER (If different) Gregory Simone]11 ADDRESS 2255 H Spring Harbor Drive Delray BEach BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516) 734-7666 ISLET CODE · · 11935 BUSINESS TELEPHONE (4~7) 774-8g~7 STATE ~ ZIP CODE F10rid 33445 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION 3 10t m~n0r subdivis0n Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall proiect, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: E]Urban I~lndustrial E]Commercial ~Residential (suburban) ~Rural (non-farm) [~Forest [~Agriculture ~Other 2. Total acreage of project area: o o:~ acres. ...... PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION APPROXIMATE ACREAGE g,~.514 acres 3,8514_ acres Meadow or Brushland (Nomagricuitural) acres acres Forested acres Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc. I acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 2.5 of ECL) acres acres acres acres Water Surface Area acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres acres acres Other (Indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on proiect site? a. Soil drainage: ~q/eil.drained 100 _ % of s. ite ~Moderately well drained ~--- % of site F3Poorly draincd % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how ~t]any acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? E]Yes I~No a. What is depth to bedrock? __ (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of th slopes: ~]0-10% ~]10-15% _ % [~15% or greater % ,, 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a build ng, site, or district, listed on the State or the National ,~ Registers of Historic Places? [~Yes [~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [~Yes X 8. What is the depth of the water table? 5[~ {in feet) 9. Is site located over a pr mary princ pal, or sole source aquifer? OYes x~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project-area? ~Yes X[]No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? [~Yes [~No According to __ · Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project ste? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) E3Yes t~o Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ~Yes ~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ~2Yes E~No . 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name __ n/r~ b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public ut t es? E~Yes ~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [~]Yes [~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [~Yes ~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA Section 303 and 304? ~Yes [~No , 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~]Yes x~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes x~]No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fi~l in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by proiect sponsor ~ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 3~.q~ z~,~ acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped 0 __ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ~ __ (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion indicate percent of expansion proposed ~_~/~ _%; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing.~l~/~ ~; proposed_ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~/r~ _ (upon completion of proiect)~ h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: ' One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially 1 ~ n/a _n/a~ U~timately ~3 ~ -- - i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structureStal~dar'd hhe~s -- -- ~ · -- _ width; _ I. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 303_86 ft 3 -- acres ultimately. (~ondomJnium n/a length 2. How much natural matt (~ rock, earth, etc.) will be removed m ., site? 0 3. will disturbed areas be reclaimed? []Yes IqNo ~N/A " a. If yes, for what intend~.: purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? F3Yes r-INo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [l-lYes []-]No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? [l-lYes ~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction n/a 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. will blasting occur during construction? I-lYes J~3No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction n/a 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project _ n/,~ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? months, (including demolition). tons/cubic yards month year, (including demolition). month year. [Yes I~No ; after project is complete []Yes x[No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? F3Yes ~]No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount _ b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes []No Type 14. WiLl surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain individal, i cesspools []]]]Yes [~No F3Yes xE~No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. will the project generate solid waste? ,~Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month __ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [Yes fi'iNo ; location c. If yes, give name d. Will any wastes no! go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain f~Yes x~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? _ 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [Yes [Yes ~No tons/month. years. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? EYes :~]No 20. will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [~Yes 21. Will proiect result in an increase in energy use? OYes If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity . 1~ p~r' w(~lons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 599 ~F'g~IIb/~s/daY' 24. Does project nvolve Local, State or Federal fun~ing. ~Yes I~No If Yes, explain x[]No 4 25. ~A~ppro~als Required: Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board F/Yes )~]No ~- City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes [3No City, TOWn Zoning Board FlYes F/No City, County Health Department F/Yes F/No Other Local Agencies F/Yes J~3No Other Regional Agencies F/Yes ~No -- -- State Agencies F/Yes []No -- Federal Agencies F/Yes ~No ~ -- C. Zoning and Planning Information -- I. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~Yes F/No . If Yes, indicate decision required: F/zoning amendment ?zoning variance F/special use permit [~subdivision [~site plan F/new/revision of master plan [~resource management plan [-]other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? --R--40._ P,~EL!L,Lc2.[__ -- 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present Zoning~-- 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site,' 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? -- 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans.~ X~]Yes []No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? - -- --------R-4g_ g. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/~ m el ,~[~Yes ~]No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? ~ l cd's.__ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? _~],~, fq~t __ 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water distr cts" ~Yes ;~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any Community provided services {recreation, education, police, fire protection)? F/Yes I~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? xF/Yes F/No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes ~]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? )C]Yes F/No D. Informational Details im Attach ar~y additional information~a.s-.mav k .... J ~ , . P.a,ct,s assoc,ated with your propga'~, nlea~ ',-- .... ue~ to c~ar,fy your project If th~ avol(] them. ~,~,,~,~,, p~ea~'e (]~scuss such impacts and th* --~ ' ,,~re, are or may be any adverse E. Verification / ~, s~/~:~sen,E~ttor.ey for Gre or Signature '~/' "/~"~/"~ ' ~ ~' ' ...... g Y Date 7'2 .... h Ih,s a~ you are a slate agency,~'~~e Coastal Asses · smen! ~-orm before proceedlng 5 ,~onding mi]~or ~]Zbdivi~on a~oprova] 7___~/25/9~44 pend~ m~r ~IjhU~ vi so~ap~rova ~ pat~_9__,~ROJECT IMPACTS AND TI-'--'F~ -~AGNt~ Responsibility of Lead Ageh~y Genera Informat on (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the rev ewer should be guided by the question: Have my respon!e!; and determinations been reasonable~. The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst ( · Identifying that an impact will be potentia[ly large (column 2) does not mean that it is aisc necessarily significant. Any large impact must be eva[uated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific proiect or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each proiect, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicateS that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. Small to Potential Can Impact Be Vloderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change site? ]YES 100 [] [] []Yes []No ceed than [] [] []Yes [~No ~j [] []Yes ~No :bin [] [] []Yes E~]No more [] [] [~]Yes []No 1,000 [] [~ []Yes ~]No [] [] [~Yes []No [] [] []Yes ~]No [] [] []Yes [~No E~YES [] ~ []Yes ~No IMPACT ON LAND I. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the proi~ Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise pe foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally w 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will c~ntinue for more than I year or invol than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t~. -...y umque or unusual land forms fo the site? (ie, cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)LqNO · Specific land forms: 6 First American I sura ce Company of New York Minor Subdivison Gregory Simonelli SCHEDULE "A" Title No. 131-S-9601-SS ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument on the Southeasterly side of Grand Avenue distant 259.98 feet Northeasterly from a monument set at the angle point of the Southeasterly side of Grand Avenue with the Easterly side of Grand Avenue, said point of Beginning also being the Northeasterly corner of lands now or formerly of John A. Polyn; RUNNING THENCE North 42 degrees 47 minutes 20 seconds East along the said Southeasterly side of Grand Avenue, 303.8 feet to a monument; THENCE South 11 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along lands now or formerly of John W. Robinson, 734.34 feet to a monument; THENCE South 57 degrees 42 minutes 50 second West, 251.78 feet to a monument; THENCE North 12 degrees 54 minutes 20 seconds West, along lands now or formerly of Farrow, Simons and Polyn, 646.52 feet to the Southeasterly side of Grand Avenue to the point or place of BEGINNING. Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 July 25,1994 Gentlemen: Re: M~nor Subdivision Gregory Simonell~ .. ~ The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration~xisting structures are proposed. ,/ /~ · Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer~ to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence~ 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership abutting this p~rcel? Yes 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town , State, County, etc.) Suffolk County Helaty Dept. 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? No Yes 7. Does this property_.have a valid certificat~ °f °ccupancy, if ~e!se submit a copy of same ~ No I certify th ~ove~tatements are true and will be relied on by the ~P~n~in~o~n considering this application. Signature of ~rop~rty owner or author~~n~ date Attachment to questionnaire for/the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: On the 25~ _day of _ JlJly , 19. ~ before me personally came_~ FlaSher 0]$en,Esq. to me known to be the individual described in'and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that _~e___executed the same. SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S Editor,1 P, llr~mMhn, COUi~I'['¥ Cb[~lll( m~o.[~ 8 5 2 - 2 0 0 0 OFFICE Town of Southold Assessors v/Town of Southold Planning Board Chief Deputy County Treasurer TO WHOM THIS MAY CONCERN The Set-Off ~ubdivis~n~ Major Subdivision Map of: ~ r'6.~or~ <~ imone~tl / Was Filed: ~'~f. zo, SCTM#: 1000- 10f-2--ff File #: Abstract Township: Southold Hamlet: Owner: Very hilly yot,s, rm l'lo. /, 9 Mnp [)ep~dmenl Cotmly Clelk OF THE ENGINEER SEPTEMBER 5, 1995 Richard G. Ward Chairman - P]annin9 Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: GREGORY SIMONELLI Minor Subdivision, Mattituck SCTM ~ 1OOO-107-O2-O4 Dear Mr. Ward: As per your request, I have completed a final inspection of the above referenced minor subdivision. With the exception of some minor items that need to be completed or removed from the site, all of the required road construction items have been completed. As per the direction of your office, the fire well indicated on the bond estimate has not been provided. The required street signs have been ordered through the highway department and they should be installed in the near future. Several wooden spools that contained the electrical cables were left on site and should be removed. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. CC: Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways) GAILY FLANNER OLSEN COUNSELLOR AT LAW ~ P.O. BOX 70G- MAIN ROAD · CUTCHOGUE, LONG ISLAND, NE'W YORK 11935 '. PHONE: 516-734-7666 September 1, 1995 Re: Gregory simonelli - Minor Subdivision Dear Melissa: I am returning herewith the Mylars with the~l deleted as per your letter. Also enclosed are 5 p~..~s W~ich I understand is required by the County Cler~--~/OffiCe. Very tr~!~; .~// GFO:lmk Enclosures Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall - Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Melissa GAILY FLANNER OLSEN COUNSELLOR AT LAW P.O. BOX 706, MAIN ROAD · CUTCHOGUF. LONG ISLAND, N~/ YORK IIg35 · PHONC 516-734'76~6 August 25, 1995 Re: Simonelli - Minor Sub- division Dear Melissa: Enclosed please find a copy of the revised map showing the location of the existing fire wells as per your request. GFO:lmk Enclosure Southold Town Planning Board Main Road - Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Very truly yours, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS RICI-IARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATI~IAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, Now York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 August 29, 1995 Gary Flanner Olsen P.O. Box ?06 Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Gregory Simonelll SCTM# 1000-107-2-4 Dear Mr. Olsen: The Planning Board has reviewed the map you submitted showing the location of two existing flrewells in the vicinity of the above mentioned subdivision. Due to the existence of these firewells, the Planning Board will not be requiring a firewell for this subdivision. I have scheduled the subdivision on the Planning Board's September 11, 1995, meeting for a final determination. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Planner GARY FLANNER OLSEN COUNSELLOR AT LAW P.O. BOX 706° MAIN ROAD · CUTCHOGUE, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK II935 * RHONE Sl6-734-76~,6 August 16, 1995 Re: Gregory Simonelli - Minor Subdivision Dear Melissa: Enclosed herewith, please find a Resolution concerning Minor Subdivision Applications dated July 12, 1994 from the Board of Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District. Please note that the Board of Commissioners is no longer desirous of providing recommendations to the Planning Board with respect to minor subdivisions of residential properties. As the Planning Board is aware this is a very small minor subdivision with an existing house parcel and two vacant lots. To require Mr. Simonelli to install a~000.00 firewe~l would bs a great financial hards? ~ A.ccordlngly, I respectively request that/~ince the Mattituck Fire Commissioners are not insisting that a firewell be installed, the installation of same nos be required by the Planning Board. /~ Very?~uly~~ -Ours' ~ GARY FLANNER OLSEN GFO: lmk Southold Town Planning Board Main Road - ~own Hall Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Melissa ~l~l~5 AUG ?1995 i!':i RESOLUTION: REFERRALS OF MINOR SUBDIVISION APPL~..,~)N~'' ~ '~ ..... i~ L ",% ,~.~ ,, t~ ~.tI~ FROM SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARDIuil ~!~"~ ~G I ~ ~5{~j ~ P~NNIN~ BOA~ UPON A MOTION MADE BY ~' ~O09~U~'--- AND SECONDED BY T.E .OARD COMMISSIONERS OF THE MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT VOTED UPON THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION : WHEREAS, the Code of the Town of Southold authorizes the Southold Town Planning Board to review and approve or deny applications for the subdivision of real estate and; WHEREAS, the Town Code includes a provision with respect to the number and location of fire wells and/or fire hydrants to be located within subdivisions and that the number and location of any fire hydrants and/or firewells shall be determined by the Planning Board and; WHEREAS, the Town Code further provides that in making the determination with respect to fire wells and/or hydrants, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold may seek the recommendation of the Commissioners of the Fire District in which the proposed subdivision is located and; WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has requested recommendations from the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District with respect to both major subdivisions consisting of four or more lots and minor subdivisions consisting of less than four lots of subdivisions located within the Mattituck Fire District and; WHEREAS, after due and careful consideration it is determined that the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District is desireous of offering its recommendations to the Southold Town Planning Board with respect to applications for major subdivisions and for applications with respect to non-residential property uses including minor and major subdivisions and site plan reviews and; WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District is no longer desirous of providing a recommendation to the Southold Town Planning Board with respect to minor subdivisions of residential property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District shall no longer provide to the Southold Town Planning Board a recommendation with respect to the number or location of fire wells and/or hydrants on applications for the approval of minor subivisions of residential property consisting of less than four lots, and be it further RESOLVED, that the District Secretary is directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the Southold Town Plannning Board. ROLL CALL VOTE: JOHN M. DIVELLO: ~ WALTER KOSIANOWSKI:~ THOMAS WOODHULL: ~ JOHN C. HARRISON~ GEORGE LES~ARD, SR.~ RESOLUTION. ~ / DENIED GARY F'LANN£R OLSEN COUNSELLOR AT LAW P.O. BOX ?OG· MA~N ROAD · CUTCHOGUE, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK IIg~3~5 · PHONE ~516-734-76~,6 FAX 5t6'73,4-7712 August 11, 1995 Re: Gregory Simonelli Minor Subdivision Dear Melissa: Let this confirm that I have been advised by John Divello, one of the Fire Commissioners, that the policy of the Mattituck Fire District is not to require Firewells in Minor Subdivisions. I have requested that he send me a letter to that effect and when I receive same I will forward to the Planning Board. GFO:lmk Enclosure Very truly yours, Southold Town Planning Board Main Road - Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Melissa (:~ARY FLANN£R OLSEN COUNSELLOR AT LAW P.O. BOX 706 · MAIN ROAD" CUTCHOGUE. LONG IS!..^ND, NEW YORK 1193"~ · PHONE 516-734-7~,66 HAND DELIVERED August 1, 1995 Re: Gregory Simonelli Minor Subdivision SCTM # 1000-107-2-4 Dear Melissa: Enclosed please find a check from Mr. Simo~-~n the sum of $4,000.00 for the Park and Playground yees. ~ understand that you needed this before the meeting/~n~gustlllth. Very.~Y~'~°u~sl/ Enclosure Southold Town Planning Board Main Road - Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 GARY F'LANNE:R OLSEN COUNSELLOR AT LAW P.O. BOX 706° MAIN ROAD" CUTCHOGUE. LONG ISLAND. NEW YORK IIg36 ', PHONE $16-734-7666 FAX 516-734-7712 July 27, 1995 Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision - Simonelli SCTM # 1000-107-2-4 Our File # 3852 Dear Melissa: I have been advised by William Grefe that the road improvements in the Simonelli Subdivision should be completed in a few days. Apparently Mr. Grefe has been dealing with Jamie Rickter at the Building Department. Mr. Grefe has advised my office that there is a Planning Board meeting on August 7, 1995 and requested that I write the Planning Board to release the lots. Very truly yours, GFO:lmk Planning Board Office Town of Southold ToWn Hall P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY-11971 Attn: Melissa cc: William H. Grefe 345 Greton Ct. Mattituck, NY 11952 Gregory Simonelli 2255H Spring Harbor Drive Delray Beach, Florida 33445 / 1995 GARY FLANNER OLSEN COUNSELLOR AT LAW P.O. BOX ?06* MAIN ROAD · CUTCHOGUE, [-ONG ISLAND. NLc~V YORK 11935 · PHONE 516-734-7666 May 23, 1995 Re: Gregory Simonelli Minor Subdivision SCTM# 1000-107-2-4 Dear Mr. Ward: Enclosed herewith please find two additional subdivision maps stamped by the Health as per your letter of April 11, 1995. Please be advised that the road and drainage is presently in the process of being installed by William Grefe of Mattituck and he is coordinating his work with the Planning Board engineer. GFO:lmk Enclosure Richard G. Ward Planning Board office Town of Southold P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 MAY2 4 GARY FLANNER OLSEN COUNSELLOR AT LAW P.O. BOX 706- MAiN ROAD · CUTCHOGUE, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK 11935 · PHONE 516-734-7666 May 5, 1995 Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Gregory Simonelli SCTM # 1000-107-2-4 Dear Mr. Ward: Enclosed herewith please find the administration fee of $2,545.00. Since the Road Performance Bonds are almost impossible to obtain Mr. Simonelli is going to have the road built prior to signing the maps. This will be done by William Grefe of 345 Greton Ct., Mattituck, New York. Mr. Grefe said that he will get in touch with your engineer shortly to coordinate the work. GFO:lmk Enclosure Very truly yours, Planning Board of Office Town of Southold Town Hall P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Richard G. Ward Chairman GARY FLANNER OLSEN COUNSELLOR AT LAW P.O. BOX 706° MAIN ROAD · CUTCHOGUE, LONG iSLAND, NEW YORK Iig35 * PHONE 516-734-7666 April 28, 1995 FAX 5~6-734-771a Re: Gregory Simonelle Subdivision SCTM # 1000-107-2-4 Our File # 3852 Dear Mr. Ward: In accordance with your letter of April 11, 1995 I am enclosing the requested two additional copies of the road and drainage plan. Rather then post a performance bond which is not readily obtainable, Mr. Simonelli will complete the road prior to the signing and filing of the map. He will be using William Grefe of Mattituck as his road contactor and I understand that Mr. Grefe will be discussing this with the Planning Board engineer. I should be receiving the administration fee of $2,545.20 from Mr. Simonelli sometime next week and will forward it to the Planning Board. I have also re.quested the Health Department/~o stamp two ~t~r~O~:~;~rS~iolm_~/~ /p~--he~eceived ~ ~ER 0LSEN ' GFO: lmk Enclosure Southold Town Planning Board Attn: Richard G. Ward P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P, O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MINUTES APRIL 10, 1995 Present were: Richard G. Ward, Chairman Bennett Orlowski, Jr. G. Ritchie Latham Kenneth Edwards Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Melissa Spiro, Planner Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Absent: Martha Jones, Secretary Mr. Ward: Good evening. I'd like to call the April 10th, 1995 meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board to order. First order of business is setting the next Planning Board Meeting. Board to set Monday, May 1, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold as the time and place for the next Planning Board Meeting. Is there a second? Mr. Orlowski: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. Ail in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. PUBLIC HE~LRINGS: Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: First public hearing this evening at 7:30 p.m. is Gregory Simonelli. This minor subdivision is for three lots on 3.85 acres located on the south side of Grand Avenue approximately 150 feet west of Greton Court in attltuck. M ' SCTM ~1000-107-2-4. Is the applicant here or the agent for the applicant? If not, all is in order to close the final hearing. Southold Town Pla~g Board 2 10, 1995 Mr. Orlowski: So moved. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. Ail those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Ward: What is the pleasure of the Board? Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Chairman, I would like to make a motion. WHEREAS, Gregory Simonelli is the owner of the property known and designated as SCTM #1000-107-2-4, located on the South side of Grand Avenue; approximately 150' west of Greton Court in Mattituck; and WHEREAS, this proposed minor subdivision, to be known as Minor Subdivision for Gregory Simonelli, is for three lots on 3.85 acres; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on January 9, 1995; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on April 10, 1995; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold will be met upon fulfillment of the following conditions; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated December 27, 1994, and the road and drainage plan dated October 27, 1994, subject to fulfillment of the following conditions. All conditions must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution. 1. Two (2) additional final subdivision maps must be submitted. Both maps must contain a valid stamp of approval from the Health Department. 2. Two (2) additional copies of the final road and drainage plan must be submitted. 3. A. The Performance Guarantee in the amount of $42,420.00 and the administration fee in the amount Southold Town Pl~ng Board 3 ~[1 10, 1995 of $2,545.20 must be submitted in a form acceptable to the Town; or B. The improvements contained in the bond estimated dated December 1, 1994, and shown on the final road and drainage plans must be completed prior to endorsement of the final map. The administration fee in the amount of $2,545.20 must be paid prior to the start of any construction. 4. The park and playground fee in the amount of 4,000.00 ($2,000 per vacant lot) must be paid. Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. Ail in favor? Ayes: Mr. Edwards, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr Vir( square acre here or the Mr. Moore: ~rd: The second public hearing at 7:35 p.m. Edward and ~. This lot line change is to subtract 2,625 from a 0.351 acre parcel and add it to a 0.196 SCTM# 1000-37-6-2.1 & 3.1. Is the applicant ent for the applicant? The ning Board has granted a variance was a condition lad to satisfy before completJ lot line change. They ~pted a recommendation have, which was to jog the ~e a little bit t( access to the rear of the house then impos~ on that saying that we could not an a. to this house until we nullify the reason we back was rather reasonable and the applicant ."eed to that at that hearing. If you have' any question: ~-xbe glad to answer them but I think it is pretty s~ Iht for~%~d. Mr. Ward: .all in~er to close the ~ring. Mr. natham. S~ved. Mr. Edwards :/~econd. Mr. ~ard:×/~ll in favor? Ayes:/r. Latham, Mr. Edwards, .Mr., Orlowski, Mr. ~ Mr./Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. / ~LANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 South01d, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 April 11. 1995 Gary Flanner Olsen P.O. Box 706 Main Road Cutchogue. New York 11935 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Gregory Simonelli SCTM~ 1000-107-2-4 Dear Mr. Olsen: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday. April 10. 1995. The final public hearing, which was held at 7:30 p.m.. was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS. Gregory Simonelli is the owner of the property known and designated as SCTM ~1000-107-2-4. located on the South side of Grand Avenue; approximately 150' west of Greton Court in Mattituck; and WHEREAS. this proposed minor subdivision, to be known as Minor Subdivision for Gregory Simonelli. is for three lots on 3.85 acres; and WHEREAS. the Southold Town Planning Board pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act. (Article 8). Part 617. declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on January 9. 1995; and WHEREAS. a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall. Southold. New York on April 10. 1995; and WHEREAS. all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold will be met upon fulfillment of the following conditions; be it therefore RESOLVED. that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated December 77. 199u,, and the road and drainage plan dated October 27th 1994, subject to fulfillment of the following conditions. All conditions must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution. Two (2) additional final subdivision maps must be submitted. Both maps must contain a valid stamp of approval from the Heath Department. Two (2) additional copies of the final road and drainage plan must be submitted. Ao The Performance Guarantee in the amount of $/42,~20.00 and the administration fee in the amount of must be submitted in a form acceptable to the Town; or The improvements contained in the bond estimated dated December 1, 199~, and shown on the final road and drainage plans must be completed prior to endorsement of the final map. The administration fee in the amount of $2,5~5.20 must be paid prior to the star"[ of any construction. The park and playground fee in the amount of Su,,000.00 ($2,000 per vacant lot) must be paid. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, . ~ Richard G. Ward Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 28, 1995 Gary Flanner Olsen, Esq. P.O. Box 706 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for Gregory Simonelli SCTM# 1000-107-2-4 Dear Mr. Olsen: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 27, 1995. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, April 10, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated December 27, 1994. Sincerely, Chairman purs~tant to Sect/on 276 of the Town Law, a public heating will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main R~d. Southold, New York in said Town on the 10th day of April, 1995 on the question of the following: 7:30 P.M. Final public hearing for the proposed minor subdivision for Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, Slate of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-107-1-4. The property is bordered on the north by Grand Ave.; on the northeast by land now or formerly of Terence and Susan Sweeney, and by land now or formerly of Mark King and wife; on the southeast by land now or formerly of James Leo and Christine G. Muqohy, and by land now or formerly of Gus, Elias and Otto Lambrianides; on the south by land now or formerly of Otha Mealy and Dorothy Ann Mealy and by land now or formerly of ~; Johannes Hansen; on the southwest by land now or formerly of LinvJlle G. Farrow & Thelma K. Farrow and by land now or formerly of Stephen M. Simons; and on the northwest by land now or formerly of John A. Polyn. 7:35 P.M. Final public hearing for the proposed lot line change for Ed- ward and Virginia Thorp, in East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-37-6- 2.1 & 3.1. The property is bordered on the north by Oak Court; on the east by land now or formerly of Frank Thon9; on the south by Gardiners Bay; and on tie west by land now or formerly of Donald H. Frszier. 7:40 P.M. Preliminary public hear- ing for the proposed major subdivision for Wildberry Fields, in Souotold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-51-3-12.2 & 12.4. The property is bordered on the north by Sound View Ave.; on the northeast by land now or formerly of George and Badoata Tahliarnpoufis; on the east by land now or formerly of Howard Kemps; on the southeast by land now or formerly of John G. Madsen & Gloria R. Mndsen; on the south by CR 48, by land now or for- merly of Telesphore F, & Helen Wolanskl, by land now or formerly of Joseph & Helen M. Doroski, by land now or formerly of Salvatore Caiola; on the west by land now or formerly of Walter Sawicki; and on the northwest by land now or formerly of Berlins Caiola, and by land now or formerly of Ssi Caiola. 7:45 P.M. Preliminary public hear- ing for the proposed major subdivision for Tide Group, in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-96-1.1. The property is bordered on the north by land now or formerly of John P. Kmpski; on the east by land now or formerly of Frank McBride; on the south by CR 48, on the west by Depot Lane, and on the northwest by land now or formerly of Mi[dred Goodwin. Dated: March 28, 1995 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Richard G. Ward Chairman 8290-1TM30 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) ~fJ~ .~AJ(~=~ of Matfltuck, In ~d Co~, ~1~ d~y ~om, ~ that he/she ~ Pdnclp~ Clerk of THE SUffO~ TIM~, a Weekly Newspaper, publi~ed at MaHituck, in the To~ of ~uthold, Coun~ of S~olk ~d S~te of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a pdnted copy, h~ ~en regM~ly published in s~d Newspaper once each week for _ ~ weeks succ~ively, comme~ng on the ~ day of CHRISTINA VOLINSKI ~ Publi¢. Sma ~f ~ Y~k Ou,lffl Nedoi~C~ ~ Principal Clerk Notary Public GARY FLANN£R OLSEN ...~,~.. COUNSELLOR AT LAW ~? P.O. BOX 706. MAIN ROAD · CUTCHO(3UE, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK ~1935 · PHONE 516-734 7666 FAX 516-734-7712 HAND DELIVERED February 7, 1995 Re: Proposed Minor subdivision Gregory Simonelli SCTM #1000-107-1-4 Dear Melissa: GFO:lmk Enclosure Enclosed herewith please find 4 mylars and/~s of prints stamped by the Health Department ~re the/above matter. Very tr~jyou~; Planning Board office Town of Southold P. O. Box 1179 53095 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 SOUTHOLO l'0WN PLANNING BOARD PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FORM FOR THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF: C~ISSUANCE OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION [~ ISSUANCE OF POSITIVE DECLARATION COMPLETION OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PUBLIC HEARING ON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ] COMPLETION OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Type of Notice: ~Unlisted []Type 1 Project Title: SCTM#: 1000- IO'7- z-~ Location (Street, Hamlet): Lead Agency: Address: Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Rd., Southold, NY 11971 Project Description: ~inOf suJodi¢igioo Of 3-8W ~tcre. po~rce. I ,'nt~ -3 hrs. Date of Acceptance of DEISIFEIS: Contact Person: Address: Planning Board Office 53095 Main Rd., Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (516) 765-1938 Fax: (516) 765-3136 For Draft Environmental Impact Statement indicate: Final Date for Comment Period: For Public Hearing indicate: Date and Time: Location: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. MaN S. McDonald Kenneth L Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 January 10, 1995 Gary F. Olsen, Esq. P.O. Box 706 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for Gregory Simonelli SCTM# 1000-107-2-4 Dear Mr. Olsen: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 9, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Qualib/Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman enc, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 January 9, 1995 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed minor subdivision for Gregory Simonelli SCTM#: 1000-107-2-4 Location: South side of Grand Ave., approximately 150 feet west of Greton Court SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted ( X ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: Minor subdivision of 3.85 acre parcel into 3 lots. Parcel is located in R-40 zoning district. Page 2 SEQR Negative Declaration - Gregory Simonelli January 9, 1995 Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The proposed project is in effect an infill in an established residential area. The proposed lot sizes are consistent with existing zoning. The site does not contain any significant environmental sources or exhibit environmental resource sensitivity. There has not been any correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time. Therefore it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-19.38 CC~ Langdon Marsh, DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Planning Commission Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant ENB Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Review of FAF Gregory Simonem SCTM No. 1000-107.2-4 December 29, 1994 SOUTHOLD '[OWN PLANNING BOARD Dear Mr. Ward: ~ As per .the y.our request, we .h.ave completed a_preliminary review of the above .re.~er..e~cefi pr~oj, ect m accoraance ratio your request. Tasks and completed activities are lnentllleO as iouows: Review Part I LEAF The p,arc, el has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amenoe0 as necessary. A copy of same is attached. Prepare Part H LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been c.ompleted and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. Environmental and Planning Considerations The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concernin~ the site and area have been consulted. The site consists of 3.8514 acres of land and Ts located in the hamlet of Mattituck. The subject site has 303.86 feet of frontage on the south side of Grand Avenue, approximately 140 feet west of Greton Court. T~.e proposed .action involves divisio, n of the land into three (3) lots in accordance en a., .zoning .e rmg lot s es of 40,00O square feet. The no.em- oat tot, ~ot ~, nas g>,~.~g teet ot ~rontage on Grand Avenue. Lots 2 and 3 are flag lots, each with 24.52 feet of frontage on Grand Avenue for lot access. The proposed lot sizes on the site are as follows:Lot 1, 50,668 square feet (1.16 acres); Lot 2, 56,700 square feet (1.30 acres) and; Lot 3, 60,400 square feet (1.39 acres). ~The s!te was. insjpected and. found to. have soils conducive to leaching, Haven Loam. ll~e .s~te ~s relauvely flat w~th a point of lower eleva, tion near the southwest corner of th.e s~te.; There are n?. w~e. tl.ands located on the subject property. The site consists ~nmanly ov. ergr0w~.'neto tl~at was used for agricultural purposes in the past. .t~mdscaped vegetation and specimen trees associated with the existing dwelling are located on the northwestern portion of the site. Tree species, including birch, maple, white pine and cedar, are scattered throughout the old field portion of the site. Groundcover species include primarily .sumac sI?ecies., poison ivy and goldenrod. The site is anticipated to support many species of axaan wildlife and small mammals. 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Page 1 Gregory Simoaelli, Mattifluck Lo~g EAF Review ?ms, e.l,elev,a .ti, on of groundwater be.neath the site is approximately at mean sea level ) .a:na me average topographic elevation on the site is 45 feet above msl, . ,mmca ,un.g a .d. epth to groundwater of approximately 45 feet. The subject site is ~_iO~eat,.e,a ~m a.Water Budget Area as mapped by the Suffolk County Department of eatm ~evaces (SCDHS). Water Budget Areas represent those locations where there is sufficient groun.dwater to develop large public water supply wells. Outside the budget areas, there ~s only sufficient supply to .a~l. ow the devel6pment of smaller ~me well systems. The subject site is also located m SCDHS Groundwater anag.e, ment Zone IV, which covers the North Fork and portions of the South Fork. According to the North Fork Water Supply Plan 0gRM-Northeast, Camp Dresser & ~lcoeKee, .198.3), the subject site is in ~ area significantly impacted by aldicarb ncentrauons over tug/l), but not unpacted by nitrate contamination. Land us.e in the immediate vicinity of the site is established in single-family residential use. The area generally surroundin the site is zoned ;rR-40 Re'sidential". Are~ furthers,to the e .as,t are. ,p,rimarily under .a~r~cultural use..~Th, e proposed project womu create m.re.e.resioentaai lo.ts, two of which are flag lots vath access on Grand Avenue. The division, of.the subje.ct, site .w. ould in effect be an infill in an area pres.ently established in single-family residential use. The proposed lot sizes are all con?ste.nt with. the existingR40 Residence zoning in the area. Based .on ~nditions on me site and area, this land use concept is adequate. There are no significant ~se..nsi~v.e enviro.mnental resources on the subject site that would warrant preservation. ylsuat unpacts trom perspectives along Grand Avenue will be minimal d.ue to.the layout of the proposed flag lots. The two additional dwellings on the subject site will create, a,.sl? .gh[ increase in demand for community services, including police, fire and SChOOl O1S[I'ICIS. The proposed proje.ct is in effect .an. infill in. an estabh~shed residential .area. The p. rop.~osed lot s'.tzes are co.m~stent with exis.ti~..g zomng. The site does not contain any slgnmcant enwronmental resources, or exhibit environmental resource sensitivity. - If.the Board ~ in agreement with this review, the proposed action does not appear to warrant the preparation or' an.environmental impact statement, therefore a negative de, c, laratio, n wo, ul.d be .aI~pro. pnate. The Board should ensure that site use and desitin are aclaressecl to tllelr satistactlon through deliberation and hearings on the pro,~ct. -- __ If y.ou have any questions or wish any further input with regard to'this/matter, please Very t~ enc: Long EAF Parts I & II c,- ~ / CRAMER, V~ ~OCIATES ENVIRONMENT~G CONSULTANTS ~ Page Z 617.21 SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or ma,/ be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Parl 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifyin8 basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range oi possible impacts that may occur from a project or ac{ion. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this projecl: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will he prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name oi Action Name of I cad ^I;ency Print or Type Namc~ of Respon'sible Officer in Lead A;qency Signature of Responsible Officer in I. ead A~gmtcy Title of Responsible Officer $ign,~ture oI Preparer (If different from responsible officer) , Date RT :3 . 1--PROJECT INF( Prepared by Project Sponsor ' oN2tThl CEe' ~h~s d°cu.m.e, nt's Jes~gn, ed t°. ass'st.'n determmmg whether~he action proposed may have a significant et ~e nwronment, rlease complete Uae entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will ~ie%~ts~ as part of the application for approval and may be subject tO further verification and public review. Provide any additiona!'~ information you believe wnr be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAr will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or inve~;tigation. If information requiring such ~dditional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Minor-Subdivison Gregory Simonel LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Slreet Address, Municipality and County) Grand Avenue, Mattituck, N.Y. NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOa ADDRESS CITY/PO Gary FlannPr ,]lsen. Esq.att0rne¥ for Greqory Simonel]i P.O. Box 706 BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516) 734-7666 Cutchogue, NAME OF OWNER (If differenl} Gregory Simonelli ADDRESS 2255 H Spring Harbor Drive CITY/PO ZIP CODE 11935 BUSINESS TELEPHONE (4f)7) 274-R~B7 Deiray BEach DESCRIPTION OF ACTION STATE Florid~ ZIP CODE 33445 3 lot minor subdivison Please Complete Each Queslion-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: F-IUrban E]lndustrial E}Commerc~al ,~Residential (suburban) [~Forest E}Agriculture E]Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 3.,9,o514 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) ~..~, Forested PRESENTLY AgricuhuraJ (hlcJudes orchards, cropland, pnsture, etc) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal ,ts per Articles 24, 25 of ECIJ Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved sudaces Other (Indicate type)~-,.~'v',,~ 4-Z,,.t.,~ 3. What is predominant soil type{s) on project site? E]Rural (non-farm) a. Soil drainage: [~X'Vell drained _~00 % of s. lte []Moderately '.veil drained % of site ~Poorlv drain(,d ~ % <)[ s~te b If any agricultural Lind is rove ved, how many acres of soil are cl,lssified within soil group 1 through .I of the NYS Land Classification System~ I. ~ aches (See I NYCRI~ 370) ~ 4 Are there bedrock outcroppings on prelect 5ilo1 ~Yes ~No a What is depth to bedrockl _. /O~ {in feet} AFTER COMPLETION ~.c~£ '~ acres acres acres acres ~ ~ ~.~ /~xm~atepcrcentageofpropo~l~p~cts~tew~thslopes: ~t)-10% '"~/~ r~lt).lS% % ~ls project substantially cont~uous t~ or contain a bu dog ste or ds r-t,~sted on the State or th o ~ ~ ..... , ..... e Nat'onal ~ ~3t.ersof Hmstormc Places? ~Yes ~No ~ ~ 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarksl ~Yes x~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 50 (in feet) ~-,'/S'/ 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ,J~Yes x?No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project-area? [~Yes x~]No 11. Does proiect site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? I~Yes ~No According to ~--Ij/,~ ,~"~,~_~--~ ~-~, Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [Yes [~,~o Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the ~ommunity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? [Yes ~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [~Yes [~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to prelect area: n/a a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name n/a b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? XYes ~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? XYes []No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? XYes ~]No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA. Section 303 and 304? []Yes [~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I~Yes 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I~Yes x[No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlk,d by prelect sponsor ~.~1.~ b. Project acreage to be developed: 3.8514 acr,'s initially; c. Project acreage to remain u ovelop~d 0 acres. d. Length of prelect' in miles: l~/a (if appropoate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of t'xpansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing n/r~ ~;~ ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular tops gem'rated per hour D/R -~ (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and t,,'pe of housinR units: One Family Two Famlls, Multiple I-,lloily Initially __ 1 n/8 Ultimately i. Dimensions (in leer) of largest proposed structuregtandai~d i~e~,S_, w ~ h; j Linear feet of frontage along a public thorouqhfare ptoiect will occupy is? 303.86 tt acres ultimately. n/a ('ngth ton slc~,% -- 3. Will disturbed areas be reclai~ ~es DNo ~N/A ~-. a. If yes, for what intend rpose is the site being reclaimed? ~,,.,..~ ~: b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamat on? [~Yes [~No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? _0~ 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? f-lYes [~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated __ (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes ~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project n/~ · 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? months, (including demolition). month · year, (including demolition). month _ year. ~]Yes ~No ; after project is complete DYes XI~]No If yes, explain _ 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes J~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal invo ved? ~Yes [~No Type _ indjvida] cessp00is 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? I--IYes [~]No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? . [~]Yes x~No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ,/~Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month O,~ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~Yes [~No c. If yes, give name .~r'~aLO '7-'fZa~,~a~*?_ .~'~D~,.~' ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain ,,l~Yes ,C]No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site fe~ 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~Yes ~]No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~Yes ;tiNe 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ~Yes 21. Will prajec result in an increase in energy use? u~eS ~No If yes , indicate type(s) ~/c/r~ ) ff~ 22. If water supply is from we Is, indicate pumprn~ capacity ~ IE per ~lons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day . 500 Per gallons/day. ~'~ 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal ~un~ngl ~Yes ~N I[ Yes. explain o x[~No 4 ~, ~ . \ - ~ ~.(wals Required: n, ~, dlage Board []Yes ~h&o ~ity, Town, Village Planning Boarcl []xYes [No City, Town Zoning Board ~lYes []]No City, County Health Department []]Yes J-lNo Other Local Agencies r-lYes ~]]No Other Regional Agencies DYes J~]No State Agencies D]Yes ~No Federal Agencies DYes ~No C. Zoning and Planning Information Submittal Date ?,wting minor subdivison approval 7/25/94 pen,ql ng mi nnr ':;ubH] vi. s0fl appr0va] 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ;[]Yes []No · If Yes. indicate decision required: []]]zoning amendment ?zoning variance [special use permit ~lsubdivision []]site plan r'lnew/revision of master plan ~resource management plan Clother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site.;' .D, ~.O Resident-iai 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 3 lots 4. What is the proposed zoning o[ the site? ~e, me 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 3 lots 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? X~Yes []]No 7. What are the predominant [and use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~¼ mile radius of proposed action? R'!0 re£,_'dent ! al 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoinin~surrounding land uses within a ~4 mile? X~Yes r-]No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 50,66_R ~q 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? r3Yes ;C]No 11. Will the proposed a~ion create a demand [or any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? /~Yes ~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? xl-lYes [No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation o[ traffic significantly above present levels? [~Yes ~No a. It yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional tratfic? ){~Yes FqNo D. Intormational Details Attach any additional informatiog...,~.--tgay be needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your prop.~i pleas'e discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. / ,._ ~ I/ v_ ~ E. Verification / /9 , , , 'certify that ,he~orn~i~n provided above is ,ruc to th, best o1' ,ny knowled~4e. ^PPhca"t.'Sponsor~am~ (>, r~v~anner 01sen,Esq attorney for Gregory Da~e 7/2~ ~ / ~' ;/ .~ ~/" · ~le attorney coati A~, 5 Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE · Identifying that an m~l)act will be potentiall,. [,:~g~' (column 2) does not mean lhat d ~s aho necessarily significanl. · ^ny large impact musl be ev,:lu,,led in I'AI{~ .~ to determine significance. Idenldymg an m~pact ~n column 2 simply asks t~at it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the re~,,:t~e: by showing Wi>es oi impacts and wherexer possible the threshold o~ magnitude t~at would Lrigger a response m uolumn 2. The examples are generally applicable lhroughoul lhe Stale and for mos/ situations BuL for any specific prorect or site other examples and'or Iox~er thre>hoids may be appropriale for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evalL~ation in Part 3 · In identifying impacls, consider long ~erm. sho:: tem~ and cumiatix,e e~fe~, tnslruclions (Read carefullv) a. Answer each of lhe 19 questions in PART 2 Answer Yes if therew,II be an~ impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes ans~ers. c. If answering Yes to a question ~hen check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impacL if impact threshold equals or exceeds an~ example provided, check column2 If lmpact will occur but lhreshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt abou~ size of the impact ~hen consider [he impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3 e. Ifa potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3 A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3 IMPACT ON LAND 1 Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? '~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater. (15 foot rise per 100 i:oot of length), or where the general stopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the ,.~ater table is less than 3 feet · Construction of paved parking area ior 1.000 or more ',ehicles ·Cor, struction on land ,.','here bedrock is exposed or generally v, ithin 3 feet of existing ground surface · Construction that will continue for more than 1 /ear or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1.000 tons of natural material (ie.. rock or soil) per ,.'ear. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill · Construction in a designated Iloodv,'av. · Olher ~mpa(:ls 2 YViil there be an effect lo any ul'~lque or unusual land forms found on 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated By Impact Project Change r~ ~Yes ©No ~ ~Yes r-l,~o _-_' t~ves ~No ~ gYes ~No ~ ~Yes ~No g gYe~ gNo ~'~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON WATER \,Vdl proposed action affecl any water body designated as protected? (tMd,,r Articles 15, 24. 25 of tl~e En~ Jronmental Con~er~ ~tion Law. ECl.) ~YES ~xampies thai would apply b~ column 2 Developable area of site contains a prolec~ed waler body Dredging more than 100 cubi~ yards of material irom channel of a protected stream. I xlension of uhhly disb'ibution facili0es d~rough a protected water body. ~ onstruction in a designated fresh~vater er tidal wetland Other iml)aCtS: \\ill proposed action affecl an,~ non-pr,":ected ex,sling or new body of w4te,~ ~0 OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in ~he surtace area of any body of waler or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ~NO J~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action v, ill require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site ;o facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Ac~it., will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body ot water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff~ ~O Eg','E S rr~ 2 3 S to Potenlial Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] E] OYes r-INo [] [] OYes ['-]No [] [] OYes I-/No ~ [] [~Yes L-JNo I~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~No ~ U ~Y~s QN~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Y.~ ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~No ~ ~ ~Y~ ~N~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 0 ~' DYes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes · Proposed Action may cause substantial ~rosion. '· Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR proposed action affect air quality? ,~O ~YES 7 Will Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce '1.000 or more ~ehicle trips in any given hour · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million 8TU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8, Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ~'NO G-]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, usin§ the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year. other than for agricultural purposes · Other impacts: 9 Will Proposed Action substantia[I,,' aftect non-threate~zed or non-endangered species? z[~NO Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere 'with any resident or migratory fish. shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 ,,,ears of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 \'Vill the Proposed Action affect agricultural land ~sgu r s urces? 0 ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 1O 2 3 Small Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Proiect Change [] [] E]Yes ~--.]No [] [] [:]Yes [~No [] [] [:]Yes [~]No [] [] [:]Yes [~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · ([onstruchon activily ~ouJd ex(,wale or (ompacl lh¢ soil pro(ih, a~ricullural land. · The proposed action would irrever~ibl~' converl more ~han 10 acre~ of a~ricuJlural land or. Jf located in an A~ricullutal OJstrict, more titan 25 acres oi aaricullural land · The proposed action would disrupl 0r pre~ eh[ i'nstallation of a~riculturaJ land management systems (e~.. subsurface drain Jmes. outlet ditches, s[[ip cropping); or c~eate a need for such measures (eg. cause a field to dram poorly due to increasud rtmofi) · Other IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES , 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ,~NO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual £AF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ~,I~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring v,.holly or partially within or substantially contiguous to ~ny facility or site listed on the State or National Register oi: historic ph~o~, · Any impac[ [o an archaeology'cai site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN'SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 [~O [OYES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity.l' · A major reduction of an open space important to the community tO Moderate Impact © [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 3 Potential Can h'npacl Be Large Mitigated By Impact Project Change [] OYes [] J--lYes []No [] FIYes []No '~ !'~ Yes ~-- ' -- _No rq F1yes []No [] I-lYes []No [] J--lYes []No [] []Yes FiNo [] E]¥es []No [] I--lyes []No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes •No [] []Yes ENo [] OYes ONo IMPACT ON TRANORTATION 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportahon J~NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's sour~,s of fuel or energy supply? ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5°.6 mcrease in :he use of any form ct energy in the municipality · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, neise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safer'/? ~'NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating. infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities [or one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous 1,~ 2 3 Small~ Can Impact Be Potential Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No ~- [] [:]Yes []No [] [] E?¢es []No [] r~ []Yes ~ ' [] ~ ~ gVes gNo g g gYes ~No g g gYes gNo ~ g gYes gNo g g gYes ~No g g gYes ~No g g gYes gNo g g gYes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes gNo g g Wes gN0 IMPACT ON GROWT'I~'"'AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18 Will pr•posed action affect the character of the existing commt{nxit y? '~NO xl~Y E S Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city~ town or village in which the project is located is likely to gro?v by more than 5% · The municipal budRet for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this proiect. · Proposed action will conflict with offidally adopted plans or goals~ · Proposed action wiU cause a change in the density of land use, · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate e~.isfing fatalities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community · Development will create a demand for addmonal community services (e,g. schools, police and fire. etc) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: ~ 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] E]Yes []No [] ~] I-lYes I-IN• [] [] OYes ~No E3 [] []Yes C_'~o I~, [] E~Yes ~-~o ~ ~ ~¥es ~o ~ ~ ~Ves ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~o ~ ~ ~Yes ~o '19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controv r~y related to potential adverse environmental impacts~ ~I~NO i-lYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(~) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impactls) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2 Describe {if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change{si. 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact '!s important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, includinR permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known .objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF II/FORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF $OUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 27, 199q: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby approves the amount of $42,420.00 for a bond for roads and improvements in the minor subdivision of Gregory Simonelli, Grand Avenue, Mattituck, all in accordance with the recommendation of the Southold Town Planning Board and Engineering Inspector James A. Richter. ~VJudith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk December 28. 199q DEC 2 9 1994 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 13, 1994 Gary F. Olsen, Esq. P.O. Box 706 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Minor Subdivision for Gregory Simonelli SCTM# I000-107-2-4 Dear Mr. Olsen: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning 'Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 12, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the bond estimate dated December I, 1994, to recommend same to the Town Board. The bond estimate is in the amount of ~42,420.00 with an administration fee in the amount of $2,545.2O. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated October 27, '1994. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six (6) months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The final maps (two (2) mylars and six (6) paper prints) must contain a current stamp of Health Department approval and must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. Page 2 Minor Subdivision for Gregory Simonelli December 13, 1994 The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions which was recorded for the original Simonelli application is still In e~'Fect for the current proposed subdivision. However, addiLIonal Covenants and Restrictions may be required as part of the SEQEA review. You will be notified if any Covenants and Restrictions are required. The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that iL is inadequate tn size for a reservation of land for park and playground use. Therefore, a cash payment in lieu of land reservation will be re- quired as per Section A106-$8 (E) of the Town Code. The amount to be deposited with Lhe Town Board shall be ~4,000.00 (two thousand dollars per lot for each vacant lot in the subdivision.) Payment is required prior to any final endorsement of the subdivision. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman (~16)-765-3070 BOND ESTIMATE FOR GREGORY SIMONELLI GRAND AVENUE, MATTITUCK SCTM? # 1000-107-02-04 DECEMBER 1, 1994 ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1. 0.5 ACRE 2. 500 C.Y. CLEARING & GRUBBING ROUGH GRADING / UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION DRAINAGE 3. 4 EA. 10' Dia. CATCH BASIN - LEACHING POOL 4. 2 EA. 10' Dia. LEACHING POOL 5. 40 L.F. CORRUGATED METAL PIPE $ 2,500.00 $ 1,250.00 6.00 3,000.00 3,500.00 14,000.00 3,000.00 6,000.00 30.00 1,200.00 6. 830 S.Y. 7. 75 TONS 8. 1,800 S.Y. 9. 2' EA. 10. 1 EA. 11. JOB FINE GRADING 1.50 3/4" BLUE STONE BLEND 25.00 TOPSOIL & SEED 1.50 STREET SIGNS 200.00 FIRE WELL 10,000.00 MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC - 1,245.00 1,875.00 2,700.00 400.00 10,000.00 750.00 SUB-TOTAL = $ 42,420.00 + 6% ADMINISTRATION FEE = $ 2,545.20 TOTAL = $ 44,965.20 Page ~ of ~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards December lS, 1994 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 South01d, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for Gregory Simonelli SCTM# 1000-1017-2-4. Dear Ms. Terry: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 12, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED toadoptthebondestimatedatedDecefnber 1, 1994, and to recommendsametothefownBoard. The bondestimateb in the am°untof~42,420.00withanadrrmis'uaLionfeeinthearnountof $2,545.20. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard O. Ward Chairman enc. OF THE ENO INEER (516)-765-3070 BOND ESTIMATE FOR GREGORY SIMONELLI GRAND AVENUE, MATTITUCK SCTM: # 1000-107-02-04 DECEMBER 1, 1994 ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1. 0.5 ACRE CLEARING & GRUBBING $ 2,500.00 $ 1,250.00 2. 500 C.Y. ROUGH GRADING / UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 6.00 3,000.00 DRAINAGE 3. 4 EA. 10' Dia. CATCH BASIN - LEACHING POOL 3,500.00 14,000.00 4. 2 EA. 10' Dia. LEACHING POOL 3,000.00 6,000.00 5. 40 L.F. CORRUGATED METAL PIPE 30.00 1,200.00 6. 830 S.Y. FINE GRADING 1.50 1,245.00 7. 75 TONS 3/4" BLUE STONE BLEND 25.00 1,875.00 8. 1,800 S.Y. TOPSOIL & SEED 1.50 2,700.00 9. 2 EA. STREET SIGNS 200.00 400.00 10. 1 EA. FIRE WELL 10,000.00 10,000.00 11. JOB MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC - 750.00 SUB-TOTAL = $ 42,420.00 + 6% ADMINISTRATION FEE = $ 2,545.20 I~NNING BOARD I TOTAL = $ 44,965.20 Page ! Of ! GARY FLANNER OLSEN COUNSELLOR AT LAW P. O. BOX 706, MAIN ROAD CUTChOGUe, L. I., New YORK 11935 (516) 734-7666 FAX: (516) 734-7712 MESSAGE REPLY TO DATE DATE Southold Town P]anning Board Attn: Melissa Town Hall, Main Road Southold, NY i1971 December 5, 1994 Re: Simone111 Minor Subdivi: Enclosed please find Mr. Simone111's check the sum of $400.00 as per your request. GFO:Imk ion SIGNED Sou~r~bLD TOWN lHlS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 December 6, 1994 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Cramer, Voorhis & Associates Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Rd. Miller Place, NY 11764 Re: Review of EAF Gregory Simonelli SCTM# 1000-107-2-4 Dear Messrs. Cramer & Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Also enclosed is the proposed subivision map dated October 27, 1994. The Planning Board will start the lead agency coordination process on December 12, 1994. The $400.00 review fee has been submitted by the applicant. If all is in order, the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the January 9, 1995 public meeting. Please submit your report no later than January 2, 1995 in order for the Board to review it before the meeting date. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Melissa Spiro Planner encs. GARY FLANNER OLSEN /~5 COUNSELLOR AT LAW P.O. BOX 706. MAIN ROAD · CUTCHOGU[, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK Ir~.~S · PHONE 516-734-7666 December 2, 1994 Re: Gregory Simonelli Minor Subdivision Dear Melissa: 4~1 Pursuant to your request of December 1, 199 osing herewith a check in the sum of $400.00. Very trul//, yours,~ Enclosure Southold Town Planning Board Main Road - Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: ['~;~o,~, Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (x:) Unlisted Contact Person: (516) 765-1938 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (~,) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman CC: Southold Town Board '*Suffolk County Department of Health Services '" NYSDEC - Stony Brook '~ NYSDEC - Albany Suffolk Cou~ic Wcrks LLS. -R ...... d CaggJano~ GreenpertW-ittage-Adm,:r,:~trote~ *Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 DISTRICT ~000 · SECTION lo7Lb BLOCK LOT ?10 1112£PC0 ; DECL^R^TION Or COVEN^.TS ^ND RESTR CTIO"S This declaration made this 30th day of July , 1990 by GREGORY SIMONELLI, residing at 2287 Sherman Avenue, North Merrick, New York, 11566. W I T N E S S E T H : WHEREAS, GREGORY SIMONELLI, is the owner in fee simple of certain premises located at Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, known and designated on a certain map as subdivision map prepared for GREGORY SIMONELLI at Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and WHEREAS, said GREGORY SIMONELLI, was required by the Southold Town Planning Board as a condition to its approval to said subdivision to impose certain covenants and restrictions upon said property; NOW THEREFORE, GREGORY SIMONELLI, declares that the said premises which is hereafter described in Schedule A>which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof is subject to the following covenants and restrictions: That there is to be a common driveway for lots number 2 and 3 and that the maintenance and up keep of said common driveway shall be shared equally between the owners of lots number 2 and 3. The owner of lot number 2 shall have an easement for ingress and egress over that portion of the common driveway which is located on lot 3 and similarly the owner of lot number 3 shall have a right of way for ingress and egress over that portion of the common driveway is shown on the subdivision map prepared by Young and Young dated May 1, 1990. These convenants and restrictions can be modified on1¥ at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. GREGORY SlM~NELLI STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On the ~9~ day of came' GREGORY SIMONELLI , ]990, before me personally to me known to be the individual described in~and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. ry Public .... at Ma~i~CK .Town. o~ ~,u ws' ' ~ .... * lym~ and bun~ ......... ~a~' and '~scrlb~. as follo .. ,, and Stat~ o~. N~W .or~. ~,--.Tv~r~,.,, . .. .~ , ~ * , . . , i ,;,?':,. ' ,. ...,* .. '. ...... '-- -~rl~ s~de of Gran~ AV~ ~ . distant 259.98 feet northeaste'r!y'''fr°m a mon~ent set.a=' the angle: · p~int of the southea,ster.l~Y sid~ ~f' 'Gr.a~d .Avenue With ~he"~eas~erly~] '*~ ' ' . and AvenU'~ said"pOi~t:Of beginning also being' the ] s~de of Gr . ~ ._.d==.'_.'..'., .& ~ormerlv of John A. :Polyn, northeas _ Y o "~20" ast along the said sout~?a~ =nce North 42 ,47 .~;E . running th · 2~ ., · =~ thence Sou~n · ot .*to a ~o~e~ . ..,.,, ..:. ' of Grand AvenUe 303.8 f~ .... n ~.~' 51' 10" ~ast along lano~.no~z~...e~,~'I.~Z~O d~, 50". Wes= 251~'7~, of. Grand~AVenu~ un~, ~F~9~. ~ ., . ~< ,~ ~ ..... ..~ ... "..~.'.~'... lll2P.?~OG~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 19 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: Tax Map No.: Street Location: Hamlet Location: Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated / / ) Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated / / ) Final Subdivision Map (Dated io/27 /?~ ) Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other /~/x? /7~ ) / / ) ( Da'ted / / ) Sketch Site Plan Preliminary Site Plan Grading and Drainage Plans Other U~ ~ ~,~,~ ro,~c[, (Dated / / ) (Dated / / ) (Dated / / ) (Dated Comments-- ~' - - Contact Person: Richard G. Ward, Chairman George RitchJe Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 20. 1994 Gary F!anner Olsen P.O. Box 706 ~%n Roan Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: P£oposed Minor Subdivision for Gregory Simonelli SCTM9 1000-107-2-4 Dear Mr. Olsen: '~tnrRay I received a telephone call from Ken Abruzzo of Young and Young, in regard to the above mentioned subdivision. Mr. ~bruzzo suggested that the common driveway shown on the proposed plan be replaced with a road in accordance with the Highway Specifications rather than re-designing the layout by replacing the flag lots with a twenty-five (25) foot right of way and road, as described in my letter of August 25, 1994. In this manner, it would not be necessary to revise the proposed lot layout. The Planning Board will allow the subdivision to be designed in the above mentioned manner if your client so wishes. Please note that the road requirements outlined in my letter of August 25, 1994, have not been amended. The only change will be in the layout of the lots. In addition: the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must specify the terms for the use and maintenance of the road. As the review of the subdivision progresses, the Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions. Therefore, it is not necessaTy to prepare a draft Declaration at this time. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Planner Kenneth Abruzzo. Younq and Young PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L Edwards 25, 1994 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Gary Flanner Olsen P.O. Box 706 Main Road Cucchogue, New York 11935 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision for ~regory Simonelli SC_T~..~ 1000-!07-2-,~ Dear Mr. Olsen: The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials for the above mentioned proposed subdivision. The subdivision, when it was originally proposed, was designed with flag lots and a common driveway. However, since that time, the Highway Specifications have been amended to include a road specification for a subdivision of three (3) lots. Therefore, the flag lots with the common driveway must be replaced with a road in accordance with the current Highway Specifications. I have enclosed the pertinent sections of the Highway Specifications for your convenience. The proposed subdivision map must be revised to include the proposed road. In addition, road and drainage plans must be submitted for review by the Planning Board and the Engineering Inspector. Your client will be required to either complete the road improvements (after conditional final approval is granted) or post a performance guarantee for the road improvements prior to any endorsement of the final subdivision map. The cost of the road improvements will be determined upon submission of the road and drainage plans. The Planning Board will proceed with the review of the proposed subdivision upon receipt of the revised subdivision map. GAILY FI_ANNE:Iq OL$£N COUNSELLOR AT LAW P.O. BOX 706° MAIN ROAD · CUTCHOGUE, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK 11935 · RHONE November 4, 1994 Re: Proposed Minor Sub- division of Gregory Simonelli SCTM # 1000-107-2-4 Dear Melissa: Enclosed please find 8 copies of the revised Subdivision map and 3 copies of the drainage map as per your request. GFO:lmk Enclosures Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Rd. P. O. Boxl179 Southold, NY 11971 Very truly yours, CC: Gregory Simonelli Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 20. 1994 Gary F!ann~r Olsen P.O. Box 706 ~t~i_n Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: Pfc)posed Minor Subdivision for Gregory Simonelli SCTM~ 1000-107-2-4 Dear Mr. Olsen: '~ztnrday I receipted a telephone call from Ken Abruzzo of Young and Young, in regard to the above mentioned subdivision. Mr. kbruzzo suggested that the common driveway shown on the proposed plan be replaced with a road in accordance with the Highway Specifications rather than re-designing the layout by replacing the flag lots with a twenty-five (25) foot right of way and road, as described in my letter of August 25, 1994. In this manner, it would not be necessary to revise the proposed lot layo~lt. The Planning Board will allow the subdivision to be designed in the above mentioned manner if your client so wishes. Please note that the road requirements outlined in my letter of August 25, 1994, have not been amended. The only change will be in the layout of the lots. In addition; the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must specify the terms for the use and maintenance of the road. As the review of the subdivision progresses, the Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions. Therefore, it is not necessary to prepare a draft Declaration at this time. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Planner Kenneth Abruzzo. Young and Young PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Ortowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~3st 25, 1994 Gary Flanner Olsen P.O. Box 706 Main Road Cucchogue, New York 11935 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Gregory Simonelli SC-mM# 1000-107-2-4 Dear Mr. Olsen: The Planning Board has reviewed the application materials for the above mentioned proposed subdivision. The subdivision, when it was originally proposed, was designed with flag lots and a common driveway. However, since that time, the Highway Specifications have been amended to include a road specification for a subdivision of three (3) lots. Therefore, the flag lots with the common driveway must be replaced with a road in accordance with the current Highway Specifications. I have enclosed the pertinent sections of the Highway Specifications for your convenience. The proposed subdivision map must be revised to include the proposed road. In addition, road and drainage plans must be submitted for review by the Planning Board and the Engineering Inspector. Your client will be required to either complete the road improvements (after conditional final approval is granted) or post a performance guarantee for the road improvements prior to any endorsement of the final subdivision map. The cost of the road improvements will be determined upon submission of the road and drainage plans. The Planning Board will proceed with the review of the proposed subdivision upon receipt of the revised subdivision map. Gregory Simonelli August 25, 1994 Page 2 In addition, please submit authorization from the owner of the property for you to proceed with the proposed subdivision. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Mellssa' ' 'Sp i~o Planner enc. § A108-15 SOUTHOLD CODE § A108-15 iMinl,~um Right- Nm~ber of Lots of-Way Width Road Width Serviced by Road Zoning Dl~rtct (feet) (feet) R-120, R-200 and 15-5) R-100) 3 to 4 All R Districts 251 162,3 (A-C, R-40, R-80, (Drawing No. R-120, R-200 and 15-4). R-400) 5 and over A-C, a-40, R-80, . 50 24 R-120, AHD and HI) (Drawing No. 15-2) 5 and over All R Districts 50 16s " (When de~,eloped at (Drawing No. a density of R-200 15-3) or less.) 2 and over All Business, Marine 50 28 and Industrial (Drawing No. Districts (HR, RO, 15-1) LB, HB, B, MI, MII, LIO4 and LI¢) NOTES: ] Where the potent/al to re~ubdivide into a total of five (5) or more lots exists or the road provides access to five (5) or more lots, whether those lots are part of the proposed subdivision or not, a filly-foot right-of-way shall be required. 2 Upon the recommendation of the Planning Board, the Superintendent of Highways may require wider roads when the potential for re~ubdivision exists or the road services more than five (5) lots (some of which may be outeide the subdivision). If the proposed road connects with an existing paved road, such road shall conform with the specifications listed herein, whichever is greater. s This construction type is not acceptable for dedication to the Town of $outhoid. l On-site parking is required. General note. On-site parking is required for all lots in all subdivisions containing roads with less than a twenty-eight-foot-wide pavement surface. No on-street parking will be permitted. B. A fifty-foot right-of-way with a minimum pavement width of twenty-four (24) feet shall be required for dedication to the Town. See Drawing No. 15-2.2 A10812 ._,._.. GARY FLANNER OLSE~I ~, COUNSELLOR AT LAW P.O. SOX 706- MAIN ROAD · CUTCHOGUE. LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK IJ935 · PHONE 516-734-7666 July 25,1994 Re: Mine~ Subdivison Gregory Simonel]i Dear MelJssa: Enclosed please findan updated set of documents in re th~abov~matter c~and filing fee. As you are aware this subdivison~has}Seen previously approved by the PJanning Board. Application is pre~ntly pending with the Heal, th Dept. / Very t~ y ~yo~ur~s~: 'GARY~LANNER 0LSEN Southo]d Town Planning Board Main ROad Southold, N.Y. 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD ~14-16-2 {2/87)-- 7c 617.21 SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In add t on, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a proiect or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for Ibis project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the enwronment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a signif'icant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Olficer m Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agl'ncy Title of Responsible Officer Signature ot Preparer [If different from responsible officer) Date ART 1--PROJECT INF( ~ Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant on the enwronment. Please complete the enbre form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considere~ as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona!'J information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such ,~dditional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. · NAME OF ACTION Mine~-SubdivJson Gregory Simonelli LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Grand Avenue, Mattituck, N.Y. NAME OFAPPLICAHT/SPONSOR Rary [.lannor Ol~en. Esq.attorney for Greqory Simonelli ADDRESS P.O. Box 706 BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516) 734-7666 CITY/PO Cutchogue, "NAME OF OWNER (it different) Gregory Simonelli ADDRESS 2255 H Spring Harbor Drive CITY/PO S ~.T,~ o ZIP CODE 11935 BUSINESS TELEPHONE (4{37) P74-R~67 Delray BEach STATE ~ ZIPCODE FI0rid 33445 DESCRIPTION OFACTION 3 lot minor subdivison Please Complete Each Question-Indicale N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: I-1Urban []]Industrial []]Commercial ,~]Residential (suburban) []]Rural (non-farm) []]Forest []]Agriculture ~lOther 2. Total acreage of project area: ~.~514 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or 8rushland (Non-agricultural) 3 8514 acres 3,8514 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area . acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and o~her paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil Wpe(s) on proiect site? a. Soil drainage: r~Vell drained __]00 % of site E]Moderately well drained % of site ~Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil g~oup I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? .. acres. (See I NYCRR 370]. ~ 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on proiect site? []Yes ~No a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) ~ /' Fl15% or greater __ % ~/s proiect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State o~ the National ~ Re~i,te,sof Historic ~'aces~ ~Yes ~No 7. Is pro~ect substantiall~ contiguous to a site listed on ~he Re~ister of National Natural Landmarks~ ~Yes ~No X 8. What is the depth of the water table~ ~ (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer~ ~Yes x~No 10. Do hunting, fishin~ or shell fishing opportunities p~esentiy exist in the project area~ ~Yes x~No 11. Does pro~ect site contain an~ species of plant et animal life that is identified as threatened o~ endangered~ ~Yes ~No Accordin~ to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ~Yes ~o Describe 13. Is the proiect site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? [Yes [~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [Yes ~No 15.' Streams within or contiguous to project area: n/a a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name rl/a b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? E]Yes ~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [Yes ENo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? []]Yes [~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? []]Yes E~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I~Yes ;NC]No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? []Yes xFINo C B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: _~__R_~I~ acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ~l/rq (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed acres ultimately. f. Number of off street parking spaces existing n/,~ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ill/r3 h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Mtdtiple Family Initially 1 n/a n/a;~ Ultimately 3 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structureS15afldc~r'd hhe~,S width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 303.86 ft ; proposed (upon completion of project)? Condominium n/a length. 3 2. How much natural .,at~J~ ( rock, earth, etc.)will be removedJ~Jmt~, site, ' · 3. Will disturbed areas be rec aimed? ~Yes ~No ~N/A a. If yes, for what intend~ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes ~No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes ~No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ..0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ~Yes [~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased; a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 . c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ffqYes 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction _ ri/8 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project rl/,~ 11. Will project require relocation of any proiects or facilities? months, [including demolition). month year, (including demolition). month year. E]Yes []No ; after project is complete [Yes X[No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? E3Yes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal invo ved? OYes ENo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal:~ Explain ' 15. Is project or any portion of ptoiect located in a 100 year flood plain? [Yes ind[v[da] cessp00]s r-lyes [~No kC]No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? .,~Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [Yes []No c. If yes, give name--; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary andfdl? e. If Yes, explain fi'lyes .~]No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? [Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? --_ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I-lYes ,,~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors [more than one hour per day)? ~Yes ,~]No 20. Will project produce operating, noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? []Yes 21. Will proiect result in an increase in enerl]y use? [3Yes x~3No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity _ 1 ~ p~t' w~eJa~lons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~gallohs/day. 24. Does project involve ocal, State or Federal funa~ing? (3Yes ENo If Yes, explain x~No · ~ /v'~als Required: '~, Town, Vdlage Board ~lYes City, Town, Village Planning Board []AYes / City, Town Zoning Board ~lYes City, County Health Department r-lYes Other Local Agencies []]Yes Other Regional Agencies []]Yes State Agencies I-lYes Federal Agencies []]Yes x[]No ENo FINo ENo ~No ENo E1No ~No Submittal Date pending minor subdivis0n appr0val 7/25/94 pending minnr ~uhl~ivison aPor0val C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? xDYes I~No · If Yes, indicate decision required: [-lzoning amendment ~zoning variance []]special use permit ~]subdivision []]site plan I-]new/revision of master plan []]resource management plan [-lother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R ~.g ResLdenti al 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? ~ lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? same 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 3 10ts 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? X[]Yes I-lNg 7. What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a 1/~ mile radius of proposed action? RqO res!dent i ~1 8, Is the proposed action compatible with adioining/surrounding land uses within a ~/~ mile? xDYes []]No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? '~ lnts a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 50,668 sq 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? []]Yes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? DYes I~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? x[]Yes DSo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? []]Yes [~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? )(]]Yes F-lNg D. Informational Details Attach any additional informatio?.~.--~ay be needed to clarify your project· If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your prop~Jl, pleas'e discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them· E. Verification/ /22_ ..,,' , .... I certify that theft ro i~lOn provl(~.;! abov( is tru( to th~ best of my knowledge. ^'~h¢~nt,'Spo~so~ar6~;~'~C~rv/f'iah~ler------ -- 01sen,Esq attorney for Gregory Date ~ 5 Responsibility ot Lead Agej~l~ ~ General Information (Read Carefully) ' · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmentaJ analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large {column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. [3ut, for any specific proiect or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may J:?e appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Inslructions {Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be COnsidered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potentia~ size of the )mpact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, is lOWer than examp e check column 1. checkcolumn2.1fimpactwilloccurbutthresbold d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a pOtentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the proiect to a small to moderate Impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Wdl the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Examples that would apply to column 2 [~NO [~YES · Any construction on s~opes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length}, or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on ~and Where the depth to the Water table is less than 3 feet· · Construction of paved parking area for 1,0OO or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will c~ntinue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil} per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary kmdf · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there he an etfect t --W u;~,queor unusual land forms found on the Site? (i e, cJ frs (Junes, geological formations, etc.)L_]NO ~YES · Specific land forms: I 2 3 Small to Potenti, Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] ~]Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes [~¥es []No [~Yes ~No ~Yes ~No []Yes []No []Yes ~No 6-2 (2/87)-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A SEQR State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an ordedy manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or ma,/ be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. 6y identifying basic proiect data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focu~eson identifying the rangeoi possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 [::]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropr ate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a signif'icant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaralion will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agoncy Title of Responsible Officer Signature of I~reparer (If different from responsible officer) Date' -- -" PART 1--PROJECT INF, ~= '- = Prepared by Project Sponsor '~ '~ ~-~ ~- NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a siggi~'~r~ on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona!:: information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such ,~dditional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Miner~ Subdivison Gregory SimoneIIi LOCATION OP ACTION (Inc)ude Street Address, Municipality and County) Grand Avenue, Mattituck, N.Y. · NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOB -~OORESS r~ary Flann~r OIsen. Esa.atl;orne¥ for Greqory Simone]]i P.0. Box 706 ' CITY/PO Cutchogue, = NAME OF OWNER ()f different) ADDRESS -CITY/PO Gregory SJmoneIIJ 2255 H Spring Harbor Drive DeIray BEach DESCRiPTiON OF ACTION 3 lot minor subdivison BUS)NESS TELEPHONE (516) 734-7666 11935 BUSINESS TELEPHONE (4d7) STATE ~ ZIP CODE F]0rid 33445 Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ~]Urban [:]Industrial [~Commercial J~ResidentiaJ {suburban) C'lRural (non-farm) [:]Forest [:3Agriculture [:]Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 3.,9°514 __ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) '~ 8.~14 acres 3.8514 acres Forested - _ acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) __ acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres Water Surface Area acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) __ acres __ acres acres .... acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. Wbat is predominant soil type(s) on prelect site? a. So (rainage: [~;Well drained ~00 % of site [:]Moderately well drained % of site ~Poorb,, drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? .acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370), ~ 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [:]Yes [~No a. What is depth to bedrock? _ (in feet) 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ . ..~,matepercentageofpropol~pi~tstewthslopes·. ~0-10% ~~ ~10-15~_° _ % ~ ~15% or ~reater % ~proj~t substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or, the ~ ~ist~rs of Historic Places? ~Yes ~No National 7. 15 project substantiaH~ contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks~ ~Yes x~No 8. Whatis the depth of the water table? 5~ {in feet) 9. Is site located over a primarv, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~Yes x~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presentlv exist in the project~rea~ ~Yes x~No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ~Yes ~No According to Identif~ each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ~Yes ~o Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the c'ommunity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ~]Yes E~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [Yes ~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name rl/a b. Size (in acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? []Yes ~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? E~Yes []No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? []Yes [No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? I~Yes ~(No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 J~Yes x~]No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? EgYes Xr~No B. Project Description 1. Physica~ dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 3.9514 b. Project acreage to be developed: '~ _R_q!~. acres initially; c. Proiect acreage to remain undeve!oped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: n/a (if appropriate} e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing, rl/a ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per ho~lr ~:k/a (upon completion of project)? h. if residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple I~amdy Condominium Initially 1 _ n/a__ n/a~__ n/a Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structureStaFIda~d h~,S width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare ptoiect will occupy is? 303.g6 ft acres ultimately. 3 2. How much natural mat~ ( rock, earth, etc.)will be removed ste? 0 __. __ton "3. Will disturbed areas be recl i reed) E3Yes ~JNo ~2N/A ~ a. If yes, for what intend._~ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes []No --"~ c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [l-lYes [No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs· ground covers) will be removed from s re? 0 ~ acres. $. Will any mature forest [.over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ~lYes [~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: months, (including demolition). a. Total number of phases anticipated _ [.number). b. Anticipated date of COmmencement phase I --__ month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month --' d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [l-lyes f-iNo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? []:]Yes ,~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction _33/a ; after project is complete 10. Number of iobs ebminated by this project . rl/,~ · 11. Will project require relocation of any proiects or facilities? 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? year, [.including demolition). year. []::]Yes X[No If yes, explain _ ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste [.sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged _ 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes [No Type -__~ndi¥ida] c~eSSDO0]S 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain []Yes [~No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood p ain~ [Yes x-~No 16. Will the proiect generate solid waste? ,,'~Yes ~]No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? []Yes []No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary iandfilR e. If Yes, explain · )l~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? [~Yes [~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ~ - tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [Yes ~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? L~Yes ,~No 20. Will proiect produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? E~Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use?[Yes,~No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from we/is, indicate pumping capacity __1~ .~3~t,~L6~Jlons/minute' 23. Total anticipated water usage per day _ 5~ gallofls/day. · w~l I 24. Does project involve local State or Federal fun~n~ []:]Yes If Yes, explain [No x[~No 4 . ~vals Required: [ ~, TOwn, 'v'tllage Board ~ity, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies []Yes x~No ~xYes ~No F1Yes I~No E]Yes [~No []Yes ~No ~Yes k-INo l~Yes ~No I-lYes ~No Submittal Date ?nding minor subdivLson approval 7/25/94 penHing minor quhUivison approval C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? xC]Yes ~lNo · If Yes, indicate decision required: ~lzoning amendment ~zoning variance [:}special use permit []subdivision []site plan FInew/revision of master plan [qresource management plan []other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? ,D. ~.0 Re-¢!dentlal 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 3 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 3 lots C 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? xfqYes [:]No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? R4O residential 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? x[]Yes FqNo 9. If the proposed action is thb subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? R ]ntq a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 50,66_R SQ fPP1-. 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? []Yes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for an,/ community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protect on)? []Yes [~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? x[]Yes I~No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? F1Yes I~lNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~]Yes ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information/,~ay be needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any adverse ia~oP~Ctt~ear~s~ciated with your ~/~q, pleas~ discuss such impacts and the measL~res which you propose to mitigate or E. Verification / /2 , I certify that the/izfform~(~n provi~d abov, is truc to th, best of my know edge ^"Ph~m,'SponSorJ~am~ "~' ~v.4~artner 0]sen,Esq attorney for Gregory Date 7/25/94__---~ . ~:~' , f ,'~'~ ./.'~ ~ lille attorney -- II Ihe acli¢,n is in ~e Coas'~lal -- / '' ~ · ' Responsibilil¥ of Lead Agen~q,~ ~ General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable.~ The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifving an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each proiect, on each site, in each Ioca ty, wiU vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. ·The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. ·In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact if impact threshold equa s or exceeds any example provided, is lower than example, check column 1. check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the proiect to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible~ This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the proiect site? [~]NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will c~ntinue for more than I year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect tl.....y u;~,que or unusual land forms found on the site? (ie, cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etcJ[DNO E3YES · Specific land forms: 6 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ~]Yes [] [] ]~]Yes ~No L-] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~es ~No Legend COUNTY OF SUFFOLK m..a~ SOUTHOL~ Property Tax Service Agency fPUGEO~ County tinter lO00 Riverheod, L I, New Yor[ 373 107 MAP EDWARD P. ROMAINE C~RK OF SUFFOU( COUhFP ROAD SITE DATA' L TOTAL AREA = 167760 S.E OR 3.0§I4ACRE$ 2. TOTAL NO. OFLOTS -- 3 3. ZONING USE DISTRICT, 'R-40' RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA NOTE. NOTE A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RE,STRICTIONHAS SEEN FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERKS OFFIC~ IN ' t HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON THIS PLAT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF '~HE BUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. " ' I HEREIY CERTIFY THAT THI9 MAP WAG MADE BY US FRO· ACTUAL 9URVEYS COMPLETED JULY E4, 1989 AND THAT ALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS: · HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS CORRECTLY SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND . ........ T TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING ~OARD 0· OLD BY E OL TIONDA D . ' THE LOT LINEE OF 91/BDIVISION MAPS A9 FILED, :ARN~T mE ALTERED WITHOUT PERMINSION FROM THE PLANNINR ~OARD, AND LOT9 MUgT DE BOLD Al IHOWN ON THE NUIDIVIIION MAP. /Ooo- /,2 7- Z - NOTE, OWNER= GREGORY SIMONEkL/ MAIN ROAD P.O, 706 ~ACoEpTEOFOR SUBDIVISION MAP GREGORY SIMONELLI AT MATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK NO. 8N - 0549 COUNTY, N.Y. ~ L ~ ~ ~00STRANDER AVENUE RIVERH~D, N.Y. /O00- /O ?o Z - .._... TYP L E -- TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM ROAD TYPICAL PLOT PLAN ~ov~ °~/k PoW~ jo'nn ' ® .® 56700 s,'~. SITE DATA= I. TOTAL AREA = 167768 S.E OR 3.8514ACRES 2. TOTAL NO. OFLOTS = $ 3. ZONING USE DISTRICT= 'R-40' RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA NOTE~ TOPOBRAPHY SHOWN HEREON S FROM TOPOGRAPH C MAP FIVE EASTERN TOWNS PREPARED FOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. NOTE. A DECLARATION OFCOVENANTS AND RESTRICTION HAS BEEN FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE IN THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN TH~S DEVELOPMENT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. HOWARD W. YO~CNG. N.Y.S. L,S. LIC. NO. 45899 " I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON THIS PLAT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. " "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY US FRO· ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED dULY 94, 1989 AND THAT ALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHOWN THUSJ · HEREO~ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS CORRECTLY SHOWR AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC OETAIL~ ABE CORRECT." THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUSDIVISION PLAN HAS SEEN APPROVED SY THE PLANNING ~.OARD OF BOUTHOLD BY RESOLUTION DATED BY DATEi CHAIRMAN, PLANNING BOARD THE LOT LINES OF SUBDIVISION MAPS AS FILED, CANNOT BE ALTERED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING BOARD, AND LOTS MUST SE SOLD AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION MAP, NOTE . SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DIST lCD0 SECT 107 BLK2 LOT4 OWNER. GREGORY & GAETANA F SIMONELLI I~- IS SANFORD AVE FLUSHING, N Y 1[500 SUBDIVISION MAP GREGORY SIMONELLI AT MATTITUCK TOWN OF $OUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, AUG B, 1991 DEC, 6,I990 MAY I ,1990 DATE: JULY 24, 1989 SCALE: r' = I00' NO. 89 - 0546 N.Y. YOUNG 8 ALDEN W. YOUI SOUTHOLB TOWN HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S, L.S, LIC. NO, 45~93 THOMAS C. WOLPERT, N.Y.S. P.E. LIC. NO, 61465 TYPIC L TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 3o'~ ' stePt~e~ TYPICAL PLOT PLAN ~,~ SITE DATA, I. TOTAL AREA = 167768 S.E OR 5.8514ACRES 2. TOTAL NO. OF LOTS = :5 5. ZONING USE DISTRICT, 'R-40' RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA NOTE TOPOGRAPHY SROWN HE~EON IS FRO· "TOPOGRAPHIC MAP' FIVE EASTERN TOWNS- PREPARED FOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS* NOTE A DECLARAT~DN OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTION HAS SEEN FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE IN THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE D$SPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. " I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON THIS PLAT CO·PLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTNOLD. "I HERERY CERTrFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY US FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED dULY E4, 1989 AND THAT ALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS: · HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS CORRECTLY SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS ARE CORRECT*" THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SURDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING I~.OARD OF SOUTHOLD BY RESOLUTION DATED BY DATE~ CHAIR·AN. PLANNING BOARD THE LOT LINES OF SUBDIVISION MAPS AS FILED, CANNOT SE ALTERED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNINS BOARD, AND LOTS MUST BE SOLD AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION MAP. oo 4 3' NOTE: I. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DIST. IO00 SEC~ I07 BLK E LOT 4 OWNER: GREGORY E~ GAETANA E SIMOfiELLI 163-18 SANFORD AVE FLUSHING ~ N.Y lIMO0 SUBDIVISION MAP GREGORY SI AT MATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, OCT. 27,1994 AUG 8, 1991 DEC. 6~1990 C~T [0,1990 MAY I ~1990 DATE: dULY S4, 19S9 SCALE: r' = I00' NO. 89 - 0546 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERREAD, N.Y. ALDEN W. YOUNG. N.Y.B.P.E. & L.S. LIC. NO. 1284B HOWARD W. YOUNG. N,Y.S.L.S. LIC. NO, 45893 THOMAS C, WOLPERT. N.Y.S. P.E. LIC. NO. 6148& NAa TYPICAL W~LL DETAIL TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM ROAD TYPICAL PLOT PLAN Fi Ilmlllld ® 50GGG r ~°rmer bJ SITE DATA: I.TOTAL AREA = 167768 S.E OR 5.8514ACRES 2.TOTAL NO. OF LOTS = :5 5. ZONING USE DISTRICT. 'R-40' RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA NOTE TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREON IS FROM "TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIVE EASTERN TOWNS "PREPARED FOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. NOTE A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONHA5 BEEN FILED IN THE SDFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE IN THE WATER SUppLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THiS DEVELOPMENT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, "~ HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS ·ARE BY US FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED JULY E4, J989 AND THAT ALL CONCRETE·ONU·ENTS SHOWN THUS: · HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETI DETAILS ARE C ECT," HOWARD W, YOUNG,~,Y.S.L.$, LIC, NO, ~58S3 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUSDIVISION PLAN HAS SEEN APPROVED SY THE PLANNING SOARD OF SOUTHOLD BY RESOLUTION DATED SY DATE: CHAIRMAN, PLANNING SOARD THE LOT LINES OF SUBDIVISION MAPS AS FILED, CANNOT BE ALTERED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING SOARD, AND LOTS MUST SE SOLD AS SHOWN ON THE SUSDIVISION MAP, 2¸5' 43' NOTE. ~ I SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DIST. IOO0 SECT 101' BLR ~ LOT'c, OWNER: GREGORY & GAETANA E SIMONELLI C/O GARY FLANNER OLSEN~ESQ. MAIN ROAD P.O. BOX 706 CUTCHOGUE~ NY N9S5 SUBDIVISION MAP GREGORY SIMONELLI MATTITUCK TOWN OF SUFFOLK SOUTHOLO TOWN PLANNING BOARD 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERHEAD,,N.Y. ALDEN W. YOUNS, N,Y.S. P,E, S L,S, LJC, NO. 1284S HOWARD W, YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S, LIC. NO. 4SGSS THOMAS C. WOLPERT, N.Y.S. P.E. LIC, NO, 61483 IOO NAS ~_TYPIC L WELL TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM o~ oo'~ Rt. $,(ep~e° ForrO~ ROAD TYPICAL PLOT PLAN ' THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. HOWARD W, YOUNG, N.Y,S. L,S, LIC. NO, 4SBSS " I HERESY CERTIFY THAT ON THIS PLAT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTNOLD. " "I HERERY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY US FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED JULY 24, 1989 AND THAT ALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS: · HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS CORRECTLY SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS ARE CORRECT." HOWARD W. YOUNG,UY.Y,S. L,S, k[C. NO, 4§893 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUSDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING SOARD OF SOUTHOLD SY RESOLUTION DATED CHAIRMAN, pLANNING BOARD THE LOT LINES OF SUBDIVISION MAPS AS FILED, CANNOT BE ALTERED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING BOARD, AND LOTS MUST BE SOLD AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION MAP, SITE DATA= I. TOTAL AREA = 167768 S.E OR 3.8514ACRES 2, TOTAL NO. OF LOTS = 3 3, ZONING USE DISTRICT: 'R-40' RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA NOTE . I, SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DIST iCO0 SECT 107 BLK 2 LOT4 OWNER: GREGORY & GAETANA F SIMONELLI C/O GARY FLANNER OLSEN.ESQ. MAIN ROAD P.O. BOX 706 CUTCHOGUE~ NY 119S5 NOTB TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREON IS FROM "TOPOBRAPHIC MAP- FiVE EASTERN TOWNS "PREPARED FOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBDIVISION MAP GREGORY SIMONELLI AT MATTITUCK TOWN OF SUFFOLK IOO SOUTHOLD >$ COUNTY, N.Y. NAS ~.Ty~!CAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM ROAD TY'PICAL PLOT PLAN FIRIE WIELI- SITE DATA: I. TOTAL AREA -- 167768 S.E' OR 3.85t4ACRES 2. TOTAL NO. OF LOTS = 3 3. ZONING USE DISTRICT: 'R-40' RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA NOTE: TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HE.t~EON IS FROM "TOPOGRAPHIC MAP- FiVE EASTERN TOWNS PREPARED FOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. NOTE: A DECLARATION OFCOVENANTS AND RE,STRICTIONHAS SEEN FILECIN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERKS OFF]CE IN THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON THIS PLAT COMPLY WITH THE REGULREMENTS OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTROLD." "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY US FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED JULY E~, lESS AND THAT ALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS: W HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS CORRECTLY SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS ARE CORRECT," THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THis SUSDIVISION PLAN HAS SEEN APPROVED SY THE PLANNING I~OARD OF SOUTHOLD SY RESOLUTION DATED GY DATE: CHAIRMAN. PLANNING BOARD THE LOT LINES OF SUBDIVISION MAPS AS FILED, CANNOT SE ALTERED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING BOARD, AND LOTS MUST BE SOLD AS SHOWN ON THE EUBDIVIS!ON MAP, 00' 2.5' NOTE: I, SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DIST. IOOO SECT lOT BLK E LOT 4 SUBDIVISION MAP GREGORY SIMONELLI AT TOWN OF SUFFOLK 'M,ATTITUCK SOUTHOLD COUNTY, DEC. 271199~ OCT. 27~ 1994 N.Y. YOUNG B YOU. 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERHEAD, N,Y. HOWARD W, YOUNG, N.Y,G LS LIC. NO. ~SEgG ~ r '