The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-107.-1-1 (2)I~-~ TttI5 PROPOSAL I5 T--O SET OFF A . -- ACRE PARCISL FROM AN EXISTING ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON SCTM# 1000- SET OFF Complete application received Application reviewed at work session Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised submission received Sketch plan approval -with conditions Lead Agency Coordination ~ SEQRA determination Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewell location Notification to applicant to include on final map -~. Sent to County Planning Commission ~Receipt of County Report --~.~¢ Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval Final Public Hearing Approval of set off -with conditions Endorsement of set off 617.21 SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The futl E,AF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, m an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be signi¢icant. ]'he question o~ whether an acUon may be s~gniiicant ~s not alwavs easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project [hat are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance ma,,, have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis in addition, many who have knowledge tn oneparucular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. ]'he full £,*,F is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction oi information to iita prelect or action. Full EAF Components: The iull EAF is comprised of three parts: Part I: Provides objective data and information about a g~ven project and its s~te. 8y identifying basic prelect data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible im0acts that may occur from a project or action It provides guidance as to whether an ~mpact is liket¥ to be considered small to moderate or whether it ~s a potentially~ large impact. The form also identihes whether an ~mpact can be m~tigated or reduced. Part 3; If any,mpact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact ~s actuailv important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions [denti[¥ the Portions oi EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the informauon recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other su-opor~mg informaUon, and considering both the magitude and importance of each m~pact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project ,,viii not result in any large and important impact(s} and, therefore, ~s one which will not have a stgndicant impact on the enwronment, therefore a negalive declaration will be prepared. B. Although the prelect could have a s~gnificant effect on the environment, there wdl not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures.~escribed in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a s~gniiicant ~mpact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will he prepared. · A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions ~'ide of Respons~bh: Officer f)ate PART 'I--PROJECT INF( ,ION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist irt determining whether the acuon proposed may have a significant eHec on the environment. Please complete [he entire form, Par[s A through E. ,-\nswers [o ~hese quesoons will be considere -a~ part of the application for approval and may be subiect co [urther verificauon and public rewew Provide any additiona information you believe will be needed to compiece PArts 2 and ] It is expected that completion of the fuji EAT will be dependent on m[ormation currendy available and will not involv~ new studies, research or investigation If information requlrmgsuch,'iddi[ionalwork is unavailable, so indicate and specJf'. each instance. STATE I Z!PCCOE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Please Complete Each Question- Indicate N.A. it not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: I-IUrban ~lndustria[ ~Forest ~Agriculture 2. Total acreage Of project area: ~ ~, ~ APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow ar 8rushland (Non-agricultural) ~ · O acres /o, O acres Forested I~o, O acres J ~, O acres Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, utc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Article~ 24. 25 oi ECl.) I. ¢/ . acres I~ ~ acres Water SuHace Area ,~cres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or ~il[) acres acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces I . 0 acres I. ~) acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres a Sod drainage: ~\Vell drained I~,00 % (d ,.ire ~Commercial C~Other .'~_e!idential (suburban) Im Rural (non-farm b I[ any agricultural land is n~volved, how many a(:rus oi slid are (lassdit.iI ,',ithin >oil group 1 dlrou~h 4 o[ the Land Classiiicatlon System? ]~(//~ acrus (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on prelect site? ~Yes ~No ~. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5 ,.\pproxHnate, percentage of p. Oed prolect ,.re wuh dope', ~_~0 I0% ~ % ~ 10q5% % ~15% or.eater 6. Is prolect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, s~te, or district, listed on the State or the Nationai Registers o~ Historic Places? ~Yes ~No 7.-Is project substanually conuguous to a site listed on the Register oi National Natural Landmarks? ~Yes ~No 8. What is the de~th oi the water table? (in /eeo 9. Is site located over a ~nmary, principal or sole source aquifer? ~Yes ~No ~0. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing ooportumties aresentlv exist ~n the prolect area? ~Yes ~o la Does proiect site contain an~ species o~ plant or ammal life that is idenuiied as threatened or endangered? ~Yes ~No According to Identdy each species ~2. Are there an~ unique or unusual land forms on the prolect site? tie., cliffs, dunes, other geological iocmauons} ~Yes ~No Describe 13. Is the prolect site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space os' recreation area? ~2Yes ,.~i~.No I~ yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scemc views known to be ~mportant to the community? ~Yes ,i~No a Name oi Stream and name of River to wh,ch it is tributary 16 Lakes, ponds, wedand areas within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name ~/ ~ b. Size (In acres} 17 Is the s~te served by existing public utilities? ~Yes ~No ~ Q a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connectione ~Yes ~No b) ff Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection~ ~Yes ~No 18 Is the site located m an agncultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304~ ~Yes ~o 19. Is die site located in or substantially cofltlguOUS to a Cfiuca[ Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 8 NYCRR 617~ ~Yes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous was~. ~Yes ~No B. Proiect Description ' 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimens,ons as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acrea.qe owned or controlh:d by project sponsor ,~, ~ b. Prolect acreage to be developed: I, ~' acres inid.dly; I, ~ c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped ~ ~. ~ acrus. d. Length oi prolect, in miles: ~/~ {ff appr¢ priate) e. If the prolect ,s an exoanso , indicate peu-nt of ,.xpans~on prnposed ~ /~ %, f Number of oil-street parkin~ spaces ~xsum, ~ /~ : prop..ed hut~aHy ~ ~ ~ Ultimately ~ ~ ~ [Aimens,ons (m ieet) oi lar~c.~t proposed suuCture ~O' . height: ~O' w~dth; I. L[near ieet oi irontage along a public thormt~hiare prolect will occupy is? - O ~ 3 acres acrus ultimately. ~;~O' Icnqth · 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ryes ENo b. Will topsoil he stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes eno -- c. ~ViII upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamauon~ ~Yes ~No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site~ O- ~ acres ~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period o[ construcUon ~ months. (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticioated (number) d. Is phase '1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases~ ~Yes 8. ~vill blasting occur during construction~ ~Yes ~o 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction . ~ , after prelect is complete 10 Number of lobs eliminated by this prolect ~ 11 Will prolect require relocation of any prolects or fac tiues? ~Yes ~No if yes. explain ton~lcubic yards year. (including demolition). year. 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [Yes a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b Name of water body into which e/fluent wdl be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~li~'Yes (~No Type 14 Will surface area of an ex~sting water body increa,:e or decrease by proposal? ~Yes Explain 15. Is prolect or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plato? []Yes ,~o 16. Will the prolect generate solid waste? EYes ~'No a, If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? FqYes ~No c. If yes, give name · Ioca~:bn d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfall? ~Yes e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~Yt:s j~o a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/mo.th. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? __ yl:ilrs 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [7JYes 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than If Yes, explain ,C C 25. Apprtlvafs )~cquJred; City, Town, \,'dlnge Board []Yes ~No CiLy. To,va, Village Planning Board ,J~Yes ~No City, Town Zoning Board []Yes ~No City, County Health Department ~i~.Yes I~No Other Local /\genc~es [Yes [~]No Other Regional Agencies [Yes ~No State Agencies ,~Yes INa Federal Agencies ,~Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information Submittal Type Da~e 1. Does proposed action involve a plann ng or zoning decision? 0i~yes [No If Yes, indicate decision required: [~zonin§ amendment I-IzoninB variance Ospecial use permit []subdivision [~site plan ~new/rev~sion o~ master plan ~resource management plan ~other S ~} - O~ ~ 2. What is the zonmB cJassifica~ion(s)of the site? ~ - ~ O 3 What is ~he maximum potential development of the site i~ developed as permitted by ~he presen~ zoninB? 4. What is ~he proposed zomn8 oi the site? ~0 ~ 5 What is the maximum potential development oi the site it developed a~permittee by ~he proposed zonins? 6 Is the proposed actmon consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 7 Wha~ are the predominant land use(s~ and zonin~ classifications within a % mile radius o~ proposed a~t:on? , 8 Is the proposed acuon compatible with adjoining/surrounding [and uses within a N mile? ~Yes 9. If Ihe proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? ~ ~ O a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~. ~ ~ ~ ~. lO Will proposed action require any authorization(s) ~or the ~ormatlon o~"~er or ~vater districts? ~Yes 1~. Will the proposed action create a demand for any Community provided services (recreauon, education, police fire protection)? ~Yes ~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle proie'cted den and? ~Yes ~No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation ot traffic significantly above present }evels? ~Yes a. I~ yes, is the existing road network adequate to hamlle the additional t~aftic? ~Yes ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional iniormauon as may he needed to clnrif~ your pro~ect. If d~ere are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your propos~ ~, phrase discuss sucll impacts a~d Ihe measures which yott propose to m~[lgate or avoid them 14-16-4 (?J87)--Text 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) SEQR 1. APPUCANT iSPONSOR ' 3. PROJECT LOCATION: TO PROJECT NAME 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc.. or provide map) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: ~New [] Expansion' [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially '70~000 S~,' F'~ae~e¢. Ultimately N/A acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING I_AND USE RESTRICTIONS? [] No If No, describe brietly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [~Residentlal [] industrial [] Commercial [] Agriculture [] Park/ForestlO0en space [] Other ~. · 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (PEDERAL, ~ATE OR LOCAL)? ~ Yes ~ NO If yes, list agency(si and pe~mitlaoprovals 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE AOT1OH HAVE A OURRENTLY VAL[O PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ~ Yes ~No If yes, list agency name and permiUapproval I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Appi,~a,t~,po,so, ,,me: ~_,"~_,"~-- A. ~9'~'-,~,',~ D~te'. Signature: ,/ ~ '?_~~ ,. / - ¢ -¢7 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, c Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this asse.' OVER 1 DOES ACTION ~(CEED ANY -YPE [ TH'~HOLD IN 6~C~ ~'17.1~? ~ process and us~ the FULL EAF. ~Yes NO WILL ACTION R~CEJVE COORDINATED R~IEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 5 NYCRR, PAnT 61757 if NO, a negative aeclaratlon may be su~ersed~~ Dy another involved agency. CS. Long term. short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl-CS? Explain 13riefly. D. IS THERE. OR IS THERE L~KELY TO BE, CONTROVERSy RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? - ~ NO If Yes, exolain briefly PART III--DETERMINATION.OF SIGNIF_!CANCE (TO be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For e~ch adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting {i.e. urban or rural); (b) probal3ii/ty of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f} magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show tha. t all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. Check this box if you have identified one or more potent a y large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL FAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed act[on WILL NO]' result in any significant adverse enwronmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the r'iasons supporting this determination: GERARD A NEUMANN NY PRACTICE GERARD A. NEUMANN ATTORNEY AT LA~' 1] DATER LANE, SADDLE RIVER, NJ 07458 201-825-0195 January 2, 1997 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Gentlemen: Re: Application for Neumann Set-Off Surf. Co. Tax Map 1000-107-1-1 The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the aboVe-mentioned set-off and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: No grading other than foundationn excavation and driveway for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed. No changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. You~ truly, Gerard A. Neumann, Esq. APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: Tbe undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Laxv and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold To~vn Planning Board, and represents and sta'tes as folloxvs: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record o{ the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be ................ .N.. m ¥, .5.e,/r - 3, The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto' annexed. (Copy o£ deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deed~ recorded in Suffolk Conntv Clerk's office as follows: - Liber ........................ Page ...................... On Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; Liber Page .............................................. On ....................... ; .................... m~,.t of ....................................... 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid en,:c~,t ............ 7. The land is encumbered by .... O..'~..~.. ~nortgage (s) as follows: .................................................. (a) ~ortg'age recorded in giber t ~ ~ ~ ~ Pa~e ~ ~ { in original amount of $-&~t~ unpaid amonnt $ ..1..~.{ ~.00.0 ....... held by (b) Mortgage recorded in giber ......... Page ....................... in original amount of % ....... ~ ..... unoaid amonnt S ......... heh .............. address ................ t~ . ........ ...... (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... ...................... address ......................................................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ........................ 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts ... i~..~..,~. ,0. .... ~ .O.W' .~.~. ,~.?.~. ).~L.~.. ...C.c..s.~.6....~...+.~ .~..i ................................................................... i0. 11. 12. No part o£ the land lies under water svhether tide water, stream, pondI water o-r otherxvise, ex- ' ~ ~..:.~3.. ~.¢.. cept ..................................................................... The applicant shall at his expense install ail required public improvements. The land ~ (does not) lie in a \Vater District or \Vater Supply District. Name o~ Dis- trict, if w/thin a District, is ............................................................. I3. \Vater mains will be laid by .... I~/.~ ............... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing' said mains. 14. Elect, ric lines and standards will be installed by ... ?'.! I..Pk ............................... 15. I6. I7. 18. 19. 20. 21. ..................................... and (a) (no) charge wilI be made £or installing said lines. Gas mains will be installed by ........ .~..[.~ ............................................ and (a) (no) chargewifl be made for iustalling said mains. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the SuffOlk Connty Ilighway system, annex Schedtde "B" hereto, to show same. If streets shown ou the plat are claimed by thc applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Soutllold [~igliway system, annex -~chcdnIc "C" hereto to shoxv same. There are no existing' buildings or structures ou thc land which arc not located and shown on the plat. \Vhcre the plat shm~s prol)oscd strbcts which are cxtensious ~,i streets on adjoiuiug sub- division maps heretofl~re filed, there are no reserve strips at the cud o~ the ~treets on said In the crmrse oi these procccdint.~s, tile applicant[ will *~l'{cr pr~:o£ ,~f ,.hie as required by Sec. .135 ,)f tile N.,cal Prc~p~rty Law. 5?,bmit a copy ~i proposed deed for lots showin;,~ all rcstricth,ns, covenants, crc. :\nnex :<c[mdule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $ .......... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at .............. years. The Periormance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE .... /-- .................... ..... ....... ................ (Signature and Title) (Address) STATE OF NE\V 'Z t2.':1~., COUNTY OF?~.-~(O,..~o~. On the . ~ day of.~'~l~.k'~k,3.,~.-Js('7..~ 19.~. ~. before me personally came ........ '(-~-~- ............ ................... ~ff-~t-J'~'xr'x'~C~x~OI to me known to be the hldividual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and ackno~vledged that ..~..~.;.. executed the same. Notar5 Public ...... ST.\TE OF NEVv' YORK. COUNTY OF ............................ ss: On the ................ day ....... of .............. , I9 ....... before me personally came ................... to me known, who being by rne duly sworn did de- pose and say that ......... ... resides at No. ........................... that .......................... is the .......... the corporation described in and which execrated t l~e forcgt)ing instrument; that ............ knows the seal or' said corporation; that the seat affixed hy order of the board of directors of said corporation. :ti:*[ r[/:!t .......... signed .............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public Sou~hold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARt; Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence~ ~ 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? ~ (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses definedTM by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? Yes 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town , State, County, etc.) 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? 7. Does this property have a valid certificate o~ occupancy, if yes please submit a copy of same Yes Yes Yes Yes No No I Certify that the above statements are on by the blanning Board in considering Signature of prop'erty owner or authorized agent true and will be relied this application. Attachment to questionnaire for the Planning Board STATE OF NEW ~, COUNTY OF~, ss: On the 7~ day of .~--~v\%IC~ , 19¢~, before me personally came_~<~kC~ ~ ~%~Ffhc~v~ to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ~ executed the same. Notary Public (a) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Bohedule A ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in the Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, being bounded and described as follows: COMMENCING at a concrete monument set on the southerly line of North Road (also known as Mill Road and Oregon Road), which monument marks the northeasterly corner of the premises herein conveyed and the northwesterly corner of lands of Krupski; RUNNING THENCE in a southerly direction along the westerly line of said lands of Krupski South eleven (11) degrees, minutes East nine hundred ninety-six and e' fifty-eight (58) lghty-two hundredths (996.82) feet to a monument set on the northerly line of lands now or fgrmerly of George V. Moore; RUNNING THENCE in a'westerly direction along the said northerly line of lands of Moore South sixty (60) degrees, f%fty-three (53) minutes West five hundred seventy-seven and seventy-eight hundredths (577.78) feet to a monument; and CONTINUING THENCE in a westerly direction along the northerly line of sgid lands of Moore South seventy-two (72) degrees~ forty (40) . m~nutes, twenty (20) seconds West three hundred thirty-two and.sixty- nine hundredths (532.69) feet to a monument and the easterly line of lands now or formerly of C. Robinson; RUNNING THENCE in a northerly direction along the said easterly line of lands now or formerly of C. Robinson and of lands now or formerly of George V. Moore and through a concrete monument North three (3) degrees, seventeen (17) minutes, fifty (50) seconds West three hundred eighty-three concrete monument; and zero two hundredths (383.02) feet to a RUNNING THENCE in a westerly direction along the northerly line of lands now or formerly of George V. Moore and along the llne of a fence North eighty-five (85) degrees, fifty-five (55) minutes, forty (40) seconds West one hundred twenty-three and twenty-three hundredths (123.23) feet to a concrete monument set at the approximate high water line of Mattituck Creek; RUNNING THENCE in a northerly lrectlon along the high water line on the easterly side of Mattituck Creek and along the easterly side of certain filled meadow land as the same winds and turns to the southerly side of the North Road, which course is approximately described by a tie line running in a generally northerly direction the following courses and distances: (1) North one (1) degree, forty-six (46 minut . ' East two hundred nineteen and sixtv~th ~ ~L=~ (50) seconds feet; ~ re~ ,~u~u~ns (219.63) North sixteen (16) degrees, forty-three (4~) minutes, ten (10) seconds West two hundred forty-three and slxt - (243.67) feet; y seven hundredths North ten (10) degrees, fi{ty-two (52) minutes, twenty (20) seconds East one hundred ninety-one and e - ' (191.82) feet; lghty two hundredths North fifty-fo~r (54) degrees, fort -fiv · seconds. East nlnat -one a ' Y .. e (45) ~~nutes, ten (10 No · Y nd eighty-four hun ) .r~ eighty-two (82) deor~ ~ . _. dre~ths (91.84) feet; ninety-five and seve~ty_~i~-~n~3sign= (48) minutes East ns (95.76) feet; North four (4) degree~, Zero five (05) minutes, ten (10) seconds East twenty-e~ght and zero seven hundredths (28.07) feet; North seventy-two (72) degrees, twenty-one (21) minutes West one hundred fifteen and forty-three hundredths (115.43) feet; North thirty-six (36) degrees, eleven (11) minutes, forty (40) seconds West fifty and eighty hundredths (9) North one (1) degree, zero nine (09) minutes, thirty (30) seconds West ninety-nine and zero two hundredths (99.02) feet; (10) North fourteen (14) degrees, forty-five (45) minutes, ten (10) seconds East one hundred eighteen and ninety-four hundredths (118.94) feet to the southerly line of North Road; RUNNING THENCE in an easterly direction along the southerly line of North Road the following courses and distances: (1)' South fifty-eight (58) degrees, nineteen (19) minutes East fifty-seven and sixty-one hundredths (57.61) feet to a monument; (2) South fifty-five (55) degrees, twelve (12) minutes East two hundred fourteen and forty-three hundredths (214.43) feet to a monument; South seventy-seven (77) degrees, fifty-three (53) minutes, thirty (30) seconds East one hundred thirty-four and thirty- eight hundredths (134.38) feet to a monument; North seventy-one (71) degrees, fifty'eight (58) minutes, ten (10) seconds East three hundred ninety and zero seven hundredths (390.07) feet to the westerly line of lands of Krupski and the concrete monument placed at the point or place of BEGINNING. TOGETHER with all the right, title and interest of the party of the first part of, in and to the said North Road as it adjoins the above described premises to the center line thereof. ,(3) (4) TOGETHER with all the right, title and interest of the party of the first part of, in and to the said Mattituck Creek and the lands under the waters of Mattituck Creek as it adjoins the above described premises, if any. SUBJECT to the following: (1) A Long Island Lighting Company easement and right-of-way across the above described premises. (2) Any right-of-way which may exist in George V. Moore, his heirs, successors or assigns deriving from a right-of-way granted on April 22, 1901. (3) A certain release dated October 11, 1954 granting to Suffolk County the right to fill certain meadow land along the westerly . boundary of the above described premises. ~ BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises conveyed to Elizabeth V. Fox by deed dated June 23, 1955 from Gerard W. Terry and Marian D. Terry, his wife, recorded June 28, 1955 in Liber 3916 p 351, et seq. in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office. 2 Schedule A (cont*d), Parcel 2 ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of filled meadow land situate, lying and being'in the Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffol~ County, New York, being bounded and described as follows: COMMENCING at a concrete monument placed on the southerly line of North Road, which concrete monument marks the northwesterly corner the lands about to be described and the northeasterly corner of land~ now or formerly of the Drumm Estate; RUNNING THENCE in an easterly direction along the southerly line of the North Road South fifty-eight (58) degrees nineteen (19) minutes East one hundred (100) feet to the westerly line of other lands this ,day conveyed bY the party of the first part to the party of the second part; RUNNING THENCE in a southerly direction along the said westerly line of lands this ~ay conveyed by the party of the first part to the party of the second part the following courses and distances: (1) South fourteen (14) degrees forty-five (45) minutes ten (10) seconds West one hundred eighteen and ninety-four hundredths (118.94) feet; (2) South one (i) degree zero nine (09) minutes thirty (30) second East ninety-nin~ and zero two hundredths (99.02) feet; (3) South thirty-six (36) degrees eleven (11) minutes forty (40) seconds East fifty and eightyhundredths (50.80) feet; (4) South seventy-two (72) degrees twenty-one (21) minutes East one hundred fifteen and forty-three hundredths (115.43) feet; (5) South four (4) degrees zero five (05) minutes ten (10) seconds West twenty-eight and zero seven hundredths (28.07) feet; (6) South eighty-two (82) degrees forty-eight (48) minutes West ninety-five and seventy-six hundredths (95.76) feet; (7) South fifty-four (54) degrees forty-five (45) minutes ten (10) seconds West ninety-one and eighty-four hundredths (91.84) feet; (8) South ten (10) degrees fifty-two (52) minutes twenty (20) seconds West one hundred ninety-one and eighty-two hundredths (191.82) feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE in a northerly direction through certain meadow lan~s and/or of Mattituck Creek North two (2) degrees forty (40) minutes forty (40) seconds West two hundred sixty-seven and forty-four hundredths (267.44) feet to a pipe set in the easterly line' of certain lands now or formerly of the Drumm Estate; RUNNING THENCE in a northerly direction along the said easterly line of said lands of the Drumm Estate and through a stone monument North three (3) degrees forty-nine (49). minutes thirty (30) seconds East three hundred fifty-seven and fifty-five hundredths (357.55) feet to the southerly line of North Road and the concrete monument placed at the point or place of beginning. TOGETHER with all the right, title and interest of the party of the first part of, in and to the said North Road as it adjoins the above described premises to the center line thereof. TOGETHER with all the right, title and interest of the party of the first part of, in and to the said Mattituck Creek and the lands under the waters of Mattituck Creek as it adjoins the above described premises, if any. 3 SUBJECT to a certain release dated October 11, 1954 granting to Suffolk County the right to fill certain meadow land along the westerly boundary of the above described premises. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises conveyed to Elizabeth V. Fox by quitclaim deed dated June 23, 1955 from Gerard W. Terry and Marian D. Terry, his wife, recorded June 28, 1955 in. Liber 3916 p 355, et seq. in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office. 4 LAND PRESERVATION COMMITTEE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main R/o~' P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Gerard A. Neumann Esq. 13 Dater Lane Saddle River, NJ 07458 Re: Open Space Preservation SCTM #1000-107-01-001 May 26, 1999 MAY 2 6 Southold Town Pl~lnincj Board Dear Mr. Neumann: Thank you for your April 1999 application evidencing the interest of your family members in the Town's Land Preservation Programs. Upon review of the application, in context with other assembled information, the committee has some questions concerning the in- tentions, expectations and plans of the owners. Hopefully you would provide additional/clarifying details to the question--circumstances: -It appears that the family ownership acquired the property in 1993 as the result of an estate proceeding involving the named family members. The deed has a notation which indicates a price paid to the estate in the amount of $520,000. Was that sum established as the result of an appraisal of market value? Was that sum returned in effect to the legatee/ buyers of the estate-land parcel? -I recall a March 22, 1999 telephone conversation with you, wherein you indicated the property was listed for sale at $1.3 million and that a broker-waiver would be effected in the event of a sale to the Town. Who has the sale-listing? Is that sale price what you expect in a fee purchase by the Town? -The Town records contain information showing landowner efforts last dated 7/15/97 to secure a 68,776 SF "set-off," in order to establish a new residence within the entire parcel, What are the intentions of the owners regarding this proposal? -2- -What are the owners' intentions regarding the residential structure now existing on the entire parcel? -Are the owners interested in: -a fee purchase of the entire parcel? -a reservation of certain areas of the entire parcel and fee purchase of the remainder? -a conservation easement acquisition (by purchase or gift) of any portion of the entire parcel. Thank you for your consideration and response. RCR:jw Sincerely yours, Richard C. Ryan Chairman cc - Land Preservation Members Town Board Planning Dept. v~ PLANNING BOARD M~ENIBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chair~man WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCI-IIE LATH.&i~I, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 July 15, 1997 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Gerard A. Neumann, Esq. 13 Dater Lane Saddle River, NJ 07458 Re: Proposed set off for Gerard A. Neumann and Kathleen A. Neumann SCTM# 1000-107-1-1 Dear Mr. Neumann: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 14, 1997: BE IT RESOLVED to override the June 4, 1997 Suffolk County Planning Commission report for the following reasons: The terrain of the property does not allow for lots to be designed with frontage directly onto Mill Road. The Planning Board has allowed the applicant to design the lot to be set off with access over a fifty (50) foot wide right-of-way. The 50' wide right-of-way will provide access to the remaining area of the parcel (the 23.33 acre parcel) should it be further subdivided in the future. The 50' wide right-of-way will be described in the deeds for both parcels. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, nett Ortowski, Jr. // ~ Chairman ~' eno. cc: Suffolk County Planning Commission COUNTY OF SUFFOL JONES. A.I.C.P June 4, 1997 Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town of Southotd Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: "Gerard E. Neumann & Kathleen A. Neumann' Dear Sir: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on June 4, I997, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, enfided, "Gerard E. Neumann & Kathleen A. Neummm", referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XZV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to th/s application. Very. truly yours, Stephen M. Jones Director of Planning Robert E. Riekert, Principal Ptarmer Subdivision Review Section P_ER:cc File: S-SD-97-01 Attachment L PLANNING BOARD File No. S-SD-97-0t Resolution No. ZSR-97-46 of Suffolk County planmng Commission Pursuant to Sections Ai4-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County plarmmg Corranission on May 14, 1997, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Gerard E. Neumann & Kathleen A. Neumann" submitted by the Town of Southo[d Planning Board affecting premises located on the southerly side of Mill Road, 826.89 feet westerly from Reeve Road, Mattimck, and WHEREAS, said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its meeting on June 4, 1997, and WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to disapprove said referral, Be It Therefore RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staff, as the report of the Commission. Be It Further RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is disapproved because of the following reason: The proposed subdivision will result in the creation of a landlocked parcel; that is, a parcel that does not have frontage on an existing or proposed public mad. The creation of such a lot is contrary to good subdivision layout principles and creates problems as far as access by emergency mad service equipment is concerned. This lack of access could result in health, safety and welfare problems for the future residents of the landlocked lot, not to mention potential dispmes over the use and maintenance of any r/ght-of-way over an adjacent parcel that may be created for the purpose of access. Creation of a landlocked lot also ptaces the Zoning Boa3d of Appeals in the awkward position of having to grant a building permit for the lot under Section 280-a of the Town Law as the future owner(s) of the landlocked lot cmn_not be held responsible for the landlocked nature of their parcel. Motion by: Comnnssioner Shepard Seconded by: Commissioner London Commission Vote: Present - 13 Dared: Yeas Nays Abstentions June 4, 1997 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission 13 0 0 DEPARTI,,1EN'F OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE STEPHEN M. JONES, A.I.C.P. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING June 4, 1997 Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: "Gerard E. Neumann & Kathleen A. Neumann" Dear Sir: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on June 4, 1997, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Gerard E. Neumarm & Kathleen A. Neumann", referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. Very truly yours, Stephen M. Jones Director of Planning Robert E. Riekert, Principal Planner Subdivision Review Section RER:cc File: S-SD-97-01 Attachment SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING 80ARD 220 RABRO DRIVE · P.O. BOX 6100 · HAUPPAUGE, LONG ISLAND, NY 1178841099 · (516) 853-5190 · FAX (516) 8534044 File No. S-SD-97-01 Resolution No. ZSR-97-46 of Suffolk County Planning Commission Pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on May 14, 1997, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Gerard E. Neumaun & Kathleen A. Neumann" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting premises located on the southerly side of Mill Road, 826.89 feet westerly from Reeve Road, Mattituck, and said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its meeting on June 4, 1997, and WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to disapprove said referral, Be It Therefore RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staff, as the report of the Commission, Be It Further RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is disapproved because of the following reason: The proposed subdivision will result in the creation of a landlocked parcel; that is, a parcel that does not have frontage on an existing or proposed public road. The creation of such a lot is contrary to good subdivision layout principles and creates problems as far as access by emergency and service equipment is concemed. This lack of access could result in health, safety and welfare problems for the future residents of the landlocked lot, not to mention potential disputes over the use and maintenance of any right-of-way over an adjacent parcel that may be created for the purpose of access. Creation of a landlocked lot also places the Zoning Board of Appeals in the awkward position of having to grant a building permit for the lot under Section 280-a of the Town Law as the future owner(s) of the landlocked lot cannot be held responsible for the landlocked nature of their parcel. Motion by: Commissioner Shepard Seconded by: Commissioner London Commission Vote: Present - 13 Dated: Yeas Nays Abstentions June 4, 1997 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission 13 0 0 PLANNING BOARD M]EMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATI-IAM, JR. RICHARD G~ WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516/765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 10,1997 Gerard A. Neumann, Esq. 13 Dater Lane Saddle River, NJ 07458 RE: Proposed Set-Off for Gerard A. Neumann and Kathleen A. Neumann SCTM# 1000-107-1-1 Dear Mr. Neumann: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 9, 1997: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency, and as lead agency make a determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. / Chairman eric. PLANNING BOARD 1VEEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS B~NNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE L. kTHAM, JR. RIC~L&RD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTYIOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant June 9, 1997 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed minor subdivision for Gerard Neumann & Kathleen Neumann SCTM#: 1000-107-1-1 Location: Mill Rd. in Mattituck SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted ( X ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: Proposed clustered set-off to set off a 1.58 acre parcel from a 24.9 acre parcel. Page 2 SEQR Negative Declaration -Neumann set-off Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. There has not been any correspondence received from the Department of Health Service in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required relevant permits. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: John P. Cahill, DEC Albany Roger Evans, DEC Stony Brook Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Water Authority Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Town Building Dept. Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Trustees Applicant NELBON, POPE ~;~ VOORHIBj LI-C CHARLES J VOORHIS, CEEAICP-ARTHUR J KOERSER, PE · V~NCENTG DONNELLY, PE · VICTOR BERT, PE · JOSEPH R EPIFANIA, PE· ROBERT G NELSON, JR, PE · CHRISTOPHER W ROBINSON, PE May 27, 1997 Mr. B mmcttOflowski, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Dear Mr. Orlowski: Review of EAF Neumann Set Off, Minor Subdivision SCTM No. 1000-107-1-1 Sou'rHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOAP~ i As per your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: REVIEW OF PART I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by NP&V, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. PREPARATION OF PART II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and surrounding area have been consulted. The site consists of 23.9 acres of land and is located in the hamlet of Mattimck in the Town of Southold. The property is located on the south side of Mill Road, 826.89 feet west of Reeve Road. The parcel has 867.99 feet of frontage along Mill Road. On the north side of Mill Road is a residential subdivision known as Sebastians Cove. Thc parcel is currently developed with a PA story fi'amc house and a 1 story wood framed shed. A total of 920.72 feet of Set Off, Minor Subdivisloa Long EAF Review · .he western propert3' boundary, fronts on Mattimck Creek .as a result, approximately 1.9 acres of the site is occupied by a tidal wetland area. The remaining 389.37 feet of the western property boundazy is contiguous to three (3) residential lots, however, the tick, l wed:md vegetation continues to Mill Road The ev..isting dwelling has its eyre on-site sewage disposal system (cesspools) that was installed at the time the house wa.s built and is not consistent with current SuffoLk County standm'ds. The system is labeled as cesspool, mthea' than the current standard septic tank and leaclung pools indicating thai the systems pre-date Article 5, which outlines requirements for single family residences. It is not clear whether the applicant proposes to install updated systems The Applicant is proposing to install a septic system m properly dispose of any sanitary, wastewater which is generated by the proposed dwelling. There is an e.,tistmg dirt driveway leaelmg from approximately the northeast comer of the site to the e.'ds~ng dwelling. As par~ of the proposed "Set Off' a fifty. (50) foot Right-of-way is pa>posed for appro,'Cunately the same location. It is unclea.r whether th~s right-or-d:ay will be paved or rern~a is. The area surrounding the existing dwelliz~, approximal~ly one (I) acre of property, ires been landscaped with grass and other ornamental plantings. The remanding portions of the sim are wooded. The tida/wetlands located on the western property boundary, will remain natural, as will a 75 foot Buffer area. Any activity within i00 feet of w~xlands designated by the NYSDEC will require a s~ate permit. Any activity, witt~in 75 t'eet of Tox~ desigmat*~ wetlands will require a Town penmt. 3a-ticle 25 of the ECL requires a permit for division of land as well as physmal site activities Tlxe size of thc parcels and proposed setbacks indicate that a NvYSDEC permit should be ob~mnable, and a To*vn may not require a permit. The Planning Board may '~ash to c~>ntact the Trustees on this mailer and the NYSDEC should be included as ea~ involved agency The project site is zoned R-80 Residential, requiring lot sizes of 80,000 square feet. The proposed action involves division of the land into txvo lots, with the sizes of the ~'o lots to be 1 58 acres and 23.33 acres. The soil classification on site is Carver and Plymouth Sands (CpE), 15 to 35% slopes. Haven loam (lq&B), 2 to 6% slopes, Pl~anouth Loamy Sand, 8 to 15% slopes and Tidal Marsh (Tm), all of which are conducive to leaching and allows for proper operation of on site sewage disposal systems, except for the Tidal marsh soils. The parcel contains areas of steep slopes, a~ well as axeas of relatively flat terrain. Aceordin8 to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Groundwater Contour Map, 1995, the approx/mate depth to grounchvater is in excess of 20 feet near the new house sanitary sysu:m location. Therefore, the location of the new sanitary system, as shox~'a on the site ple~a, would allow for sufficient depth m groundwater from the bogota of the leaching pools. The subject site is located outside the Water Budget Area as mapped by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). The Water Budget Area includes those locaUoas where *.here is sufficient groundwater to develop large public water supply wells. Outside the wa~cr budget areas, there is only sufficient supply to allow the development of smaller home well syst. mv~. There is currently one (1) existing well on t.he subject site whmh supplies the existing dwelling. TL3TAL P. 02 Neumani~et Off, Minor Subdivi~on Long EAF Review The subject site is locaL,~i in SCDHS Groundwater Management Zone IV, which covers the North Fork and portions of the South Fork. According to the North Fork Water Supply Plan (ERM- Northeast, Camp Dresser & McKee, 1983), the subject site is adjacent to an area which is significantly impacted by nitrogen and aldiearb with concentrations over 8 mg/l and 12.3 ppb, respectively. Land use in the immediate vicinity of the site is established in single-family residential uses and marinas. The area surrounding the site is zoned R-80 Residential, although there are some pre- existing undersized lots in the area. The area is characterized by a mix of small winterized cottages, and larger year-round houses. Therefore, the land division would not create a situation unusual to the area. The proposed division of land would not create a significant precedent since the Neumann situation is unique to the area. There do not appear to be any other large wooded lots in thc area which could bc subdivided. The existing dwelling is presently inhabited and a new dwelling will be constructed. Thus, approval of this project may create a slight increase in demand for community services, including police, fire and school districts. In conclusion, the subject application is for a "set off" or minor subdivision of a 1.58 acre lot from an existing 24.9 acrc parcel. This set off will allow the Applicant to construct one (1) single family house on the 1.58 acre lot. Thcre are no significant sensitive environmental resources on the subject site that would will be impacted by the proposed division of land, except for the removal of approximately 0.9 acres of existing woods. This would result in a net change in the use of the property as stated on pagc 2 of thc EAF. Thc proposed environmental impacts would be relatively minor, thus not warranting the preparation of a Draft EIS. If the Board is in agreement with this review, the proposed action dees not appear to warrant thc preparation of an environmental impact statement, therefore a negative declaration would be appropriate. The Board should ensure that site use and design are addressed to their satisfaction through deliberation and hearings on thc project. If you have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to call. CJV/sjm enc.: Long EAF Parts I & II Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC PART 1--FROJEC¥ INFER ION Prepared by Project Sponsor P!ease Complele Each Question-lndicale ,',l.A. ii not applicable A. Sits Description Physical settm8 oi overall orolec:, both de,;e!oped and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: .'RUrban ImlndustriaI [~ Fores r. :m ?,,g r cuiture :. Tota~ -~crea~e o~ proie~= a~ea: '¢ '~, ~ APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushi~d (Non-agricui~ur:i] ~o~.~d (~) '~Commercial ~Other .'~.-~_e s id e n u a I {~uburbam CRurai (non-farm PRESENTLY ,,\gricuhurai Onc!udes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) wetland {Freshwater or Ud;i as per ,Articles 2,1. 25 of Unvegetated (Rock, earth or ¢iil] Other --"*ro,ec~ ~2.1 H, B, f'/c 4 AFTER COMPLETION acres ~T~-~ acres acres ~'%~.g ~ acres ~cres /~ c~ acres acres g2,~ ~ ~ acres ,:ores -~,~) acres $. ',Vha~ is (he deo{h cf ;he wa~er zabie~ ~-~'J~/Lt~[in feecl ,~ c~ ~ c~ ~ ¢~ ~ ~ ~0 OD hun(~ns, f~hln~ or shell [ishm8 ooportun,{~es presendv ex~s¢ ~n the prolect area? ~Ye~ ~o ~Yes ~No Accordin~ ~o ~den[~fy e~ch species 12. Are mere any umque or unusual land forms on ~he projec~ si{e{ (ie.. ciiEfs.'dunes, o~her ~eoios~cal Eormac:ons; ~Yes ~No Describe '~Yes ~No I~; yes, expla;n ~Yes a. Name ~/ ~ b. Si~e lin :cres~ fs ~he s~ce ser,ze0 by ex~sdn~ OuOiic uaiic:es~ ~Yes ~} ff Yes, does suffic~en~ capacity exis~ ~o allow connec~on~ .~Yes ~No b) ff Yes. will immovemen[s be necessary ~o allow connec:ion? ~ecuon 303 ana 304? ~Yes oi me ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes ~No Has ~he s:~e ever been used for ~he disposal oi solia or hazardous w,~s~?. ~Yes ~No B. Project Description % Physical dimensions and scale oi proiect (fill in dirnensinns as appropriate) a. To~al con{~guous acreage owned or controlh:d by p~olec[ sponsor ~ '~, ~ b Pro,cc: acreage ~o be developed: ~, ~ ~cres imdMIv; ~, ~ d. Length of prolect. ~n relies: ~ / ~ (if aporopna[e) 3 ~.Yes 7. If multi-phased: c. AOproxlmate coml:lecion date of final phase d. Is phase'l funcuonally dependent on subsequent phases? 8, ',Viii blasung occur during construction? ~Yes 9 ,Number of jobs generated: during construcaon 10 "lumber of lobs eliminated by this prolec: ~ . ,months (inciuding demoimon). montn year. (including demoli[~onL f-lYes Z'(es ~,No if yes. explain i2. Is surface [icm~d waste disqosal involved? iT__;Yes a. If yes. indicate type of waste [sewage. industrial, etc. j and amount b. Flame of water boor into wMch effluent w,i[ be i3. is subsurface liquid waste disposal involve.z? ~Yes ~No Tv~e 14 ,,Viii surface area of an ex,sung water boa,.. ,ncrea~e or decrease by ,rccosal? ~xpia~n will the prolecr, generate solid waste? ~Yes ~za~No a. If yes. what is the amount per month O-,..¢q~' tons b. If yes. will an exlsung solid waste facility be used? c. If yes. give name I oq, or~ o -~ e. if Yes. explain t7. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes. what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes. what is the anumpa(ed 5ite life? years. 18. ','viii proiect use herbiodes or pesucid<:s? [-'Yes Ci~¥. Town '/iiiage ?!J, nning :3Dare CitY. County Health ©eoar~ment ,~'r'es ~No Other Reg~ona~ &genc;es ~Yes ~No S~ate Agenc:e~ ~Yes F~deral AgenDas ~Yes ~No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a plannin§ or zoning decision? ~Yes eno . if Yes, indicate decision required: ~zoning amendment ~zomng var,ante ~speciat use permit -4~ubdivision ~site plan I~ne,.virevismn of master, plan I~,resource management plan ~_~other ~ ~ ' o~ ~ 2. What is ~he zonin~ classification(Mai the s~te? ~- ~ O 3. What is ~he maximum potential development of the site ;i de'/e~oDed as perm~tte~ by the present zomn~? 4. What is the ~ro0osed zoning of the site? N~ ~k~ 5 What ~s memax~um ~otenuat development of the sl~e if develo~e~ as ~erm~tteo bv she ~ro0osed zoning? 6 Is the 2roposed ac~on consistent w~[h ~he recommended use~ in adopted local land use plans? 7 ',Vha( are me predominant land use~'sj Jnd zonm~ classificJtlons within a '4 rode radius o¢ proOOSed 3 is the proposed ac:~on comoatibte w~th ad~ommg!surroundinB [and uses within a '.4 rode? ?~(es ~, 9 If the proposed aczion ~s ~he subdiwsmn of land. how many lots are proposed? '~ O a. What is the mimmum lot s~ze pro0osed? ~2, ~ ~ ~ ~0 Wiil proposed action reqmre any au[~orizaUoR(s) for the formauon oi~er or ~vatar dismc:s? ~Yes ~N, 7t. Wild the proposed action create a demand for any ¢ommumty provided services (recreatmn, education, police fire ~rotect on)? ~Yes ~No a. tf yes. is ex,sting caoacity sufficient ~o handle proiec~ed demand? ~Yes ~No 12. Will the prooosed action result in (he ~enerauon of traffic s~gmficandy above present levels? ~Yes a. If yes, is (he exisdn8 road network adequam (o hamlle (he addiuonal c~aiiic? ~Yes D. informational Details PLANNING BOARD Y[EMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSK/, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS K~ENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHA/V~, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town HAL1, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1997 John A. Keogh, Secretary MatLi[uck Fire District Pike St,. Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find two (2) surveys dated for SCTM# 1000- ~0'~-I- I The enclosed site plan is being referred [o you for fire access review and for your recommendations as [o wheLher any fire- wells are needed. Please specify whekher firewetls are shallow or electric. [~'/The enclosed subdivision is being referred Lo you for your recom- mendation at to whether any firewetls are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or eleckie. Please reply by cooperaLion. Sinceretv. ~enneLt, Oflowski, Jr. Chairman eric. ._J(j ne.. Z ~ 1997. Thank you for your RESOLUTION= REFERRALs OF MINOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS FROM SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD UPON A MOTION MADE BY SECONDED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT VOTED UPON THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Code of the Town of Southold authorizes the Southold Town Planning Board to review and approve or deny applications for the subdivision of real estate andl WHEREAS, the Town Code includes a provision with respect to the number and location of fire wells and/or fire hydrants to be located within subdivisions and that the number and location of any fire hydrants and/or firewells shall be determined by the Planning Board and~ WHEREAS, the Town Code further provides that in making the determination with respect to fire wells and/or hydrants, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold may seek the recommendation of the Commissioners of the Fire District in which the proposed subdivision is located and~ WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has requested recommendations from . the Board of Fire · Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District with respect to both major subdivisions consisting of four or more lots and minor subdivisions consisting of lees than four lots of-subdivisions located within the Mattituck Fire District and~ WHEREAS, after due and careful consideration it is determined that the Board of Fire CommissiOners of the Nattituck Fire District is deeireous of offering its recommendations to the Southold Town Planning Board with respect to applications for major subdivisions and for applications with respect to non-residential property uses including minor and major subdivisions and site plan reviews and~ WHEREA~, the Board of Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District is no longer desirous of providing a recommendation to the Southold Town Planning Bo&rd with respect to minor subdivisions of residential property~ NOW, THEREFOREt Commissioners of the BE IT RESOLVED~ that the Board of Fire Mat~ituck.~Fire, District ,shall no longer provide to the Southold Town Planning Board a recommendation with respect to the number or location.of fire wells and/or hydrants on applications for the approval of, minor eubivieione of residential property consisting of less than four lots, and be it further RESOLVED, that the District Secretary is directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the,Southold Town Plannning Board. ROLL CALL VOTEs JOHN N. DIVELLO= ~ WALTER KOSIANOWSKI:~ THOMAS WOODHULLI ~ JOHN C. HARRXSON~ GEORGE LESSARDt SR*~ : ,, t RESOLUTION~ ~~/ ~ DENIED. RAYMOND L. JACOBS SUPERINTENDENT $OUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Fax. (516)-765-1750 ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(516)- 765- 3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 22, 1997 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, NewYork 11971 Re: Gerard and Kathleen Neumann Proposed Set-Off, Mill Road, Mattituck SCTM #: 1000- 107- 01 - 01 Dear Mr. Orlowski ' As per your request, I have reviewed the above referenced Set-Off for Drainage Requirements. The Set-Off as proposed will utilize the existing driveway and does not include new road construction. Therefore, it will not create any additional runoff that would be considered destructive or harmful to the environment. Run-Off created by the construction of a house within the Set-Off would be addressed by the Town Building Department and theState Dept. Of Environmental Conservation when issuing construction permits. At this time there does not appear to be enough concern to warrant the installation of additional drainage. If and when the 50' Right-of-Way and the adjacent property is ever developed, the drainage requirements should be re-reviewed to accommodate the proposed development. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. CC: Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways) · Richter, R A. ~AY 2 3 $97 p~UTHOLD TOWN NmG 6o~qO Albert J. Krupski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President ,Jim King Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: e-~ROM: RE: Melissa Spiro, Planner Albert J. KruDski, Jr. ~ Southold Town-Trustees Proposed Set-off ~ Gerard Neumann and Kathleen Neumann SCTM #107-1-1 DATE: May 22, 1997 The Wetland line on the submitted map seems to be accurate. The Board feels that this would be a good location for a storm water runoff project as Mattituck Inlet is the focus of our water quality improvement program. The exact location is the swale between the house and Old Mill Road. PLANNING BOARD 1VIEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCI-IIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 May 13, 1997 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Charles Voorhis Nelson Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Rd. Melville, NY 1t747 Re: Review of EAF for Gerard and Kathleen Neumann SCTM# Dear Mr. Voorhis: The $outhold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the abo~e mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Also enclosed are: I. Map dated December 12, 1996 2. Planning Board resolution dated May 13, 1997 The Planning Boarci started the lead agency coordination process on May 12, 1997. The $400 review fee has been submitted by the applicant. If all is in order, the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the June 9, I997 public meeting. Please submit your repopc no later than June 2, 1997 in order for the Board to review it before the meeting date. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. Please contact this office if there are any questions regardin§ the above. Sincerely, Chairman elqc. Sttbmi~;sio~t IFithottl a Co~f"~'r Lelte~' ~ L~ F PL.~NNING BOAB, D 34]EMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chaiman ~LLI.~I J. CREMERS ~NNETH L. EDW.~S GEORGE ~ITCHIE ~.~i. JR. RIC~D G. W~ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Sou[hold. New York 11971 Fax (5t6) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1.938 PLA~NrNING BOA. RD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I997 ,John A. Keoeh, ~ ~ _ ~ecr,,~ary Mattituck Fire District Pike St. Mattituck, NY 11953 Dear ~r. Keogh: Enclosed please find two (.2) survevs da[ed [] The enciosed site plan is being referred t,o you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fire- wells are needed. Please specify whether firewetls are shallow or electric. ~'/The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recom- mendation at to whether any [irewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Please reply by --,Ictme~ Z, cooperaLion. ~99r, Thank you for your Sincerely BenneLL Oriowski. Jr Chairman eno. PLANNING BOARD NIEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCI-I/E LATI~AM, JR. RICHARD G. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: f~ec~%~ c~ 'r~c,-F ~e /~)~o,'~¢,~¢, ~:::'~m~'oo~-~o~ RequestedAction:'-~ro~,s¢~ 0(o5~c 5~.k'-o-C~C' 04 gF, ~6 ~-~Jc SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (~.) Unlisted Contact Person: (516) 765-1938 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (~) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Bennett Orlowski, Jr ,~ ... Chairman ' ~ '.%¢ cc: ~ Board of Trustees Building Department Southold Town Board ~Suffolk County Department of Health Services ~NYSDEC - Stony Brook -*NYSDEC - Albany ................. . .................. . ...... on ~ .... ~,,~,,~u~ ~ ...... ~ D, ,~l~ Utilifi~ Raymond V~nEtten, Greenpa~ V!H~ge Ad~r Suffalk Caunty Water Autharity *Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 PLANNING BOARD YIENIBERS RICI-L&I~D G. WARD QEORGE I~ITCHIE LATH~. JR. BENNETT OP~LOWSKL JR. WILLLAM J. CREMERS ~NNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P O. Box 1179 Sounhold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone i5i6) 765-1938 PLANWTNG BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County Planning Commission H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veteran's Memodal Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffotk County Planning Commission: S.C.D.P.W. Topo No.: Zoning '.,~. ' .~ S.C. Tax Map No.: 1000- lc? - I - I Major Sub. Minor Sub./',,. Site Plan __Cluster . Lot Line Change MATERIAL SUBMITTED: ~ Plat (3 copies) ~, Road Profiles (1).__ Drainage Plans (1) Topographical Map (1) Site Plan (1) Grading Plan (1)__ Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet Page 2 Southold Town Planning Board Referral Referral Cdteda: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an (/~) Unlisted Action ( ) Type I Action ( ) Type II Action 2. A ( ) Negative Declaration ( ) Positive Declaration ( ) Determination of Non-significance has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I,S. statement enclosed. ( ) Yes ('~) NO 4, The proposed division has received approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health. ( )Yes (/)No We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral ( ) Yes ( )No Referral received Commission and assigned File No. 1994 by the Suffolk County Planning Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. "' Chairman cc: Frank Cichanowicz rev. 6/94 PLANNING BOARD M~MBERS RICHARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town I-fall, 53095 .~[ain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Dear Mr, Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review, Application Name: Tax Map No.: Street Location: Hamlet Location: 1000- Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Bated Sketch Site Plan Preliminary Site Plan (Dated / / ) (Dated / / ) Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated / / ) Other (Dated / / ) Contact person: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS RICHARD G. WARD GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS K~NNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Albert J. Krupski, Jr. Southold Town Trustees Spiro, Planner~f Melissa Proposed set-off Gerard Neumann and Kathleen Neumann SCTM#1000-107-1-1 May 13, 1997 Attached please find the map dated December 12, 1996, for the above mentioned set off and the Planning Board's May 12, 1997 resolution granting sketch plan approval to the set off. As indicated in the Planning Board's letter, the applicant has been asked to indicated the upland and wetland area for the proposed set off lot. In addition, the Planning Board has asked for a 75' wetland buffer to be shown on the final map. Please verify the wetland location shown on the enclosed map. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the above or require any additional information. eric. PLANNING BOARD M~EMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fmx (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 May 13, 1997 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Gerard A. Neumann, Esq. 13 Dater Lane Saddle River, NJ 07458 RE: Proposed Set-Off for Gerard A. Neumann and Kathleen A. Neumann SCTM# 1000-107-1-1 Dear Mr. Neumann: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 12, 1997: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated December 12, 1996, with the following conditions: The upland area and the wetland area for the set off parcel must be shown on the map. The Planning Board is treating the set off proposal as a cluster subdivision. Therefore, before determining the yield for any future subdivision of the remaining 23.33 acre parcel, an amount equal to 80,000 square feet minus the upland area of the set off parcel must be subtracted from the total area of the parcel to be subdivided. The final map must contain a notation that the subdivision has been designed as a cluster subdivision and must contain a notation stating the above mentioned condition pertaining to the future yield of the property. The notation in regard to the determination of yield must be contained in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. A building envelope indicating front, rear and side yard setbacks must be shown for the set off parcel. Page 2 Proposed set-off ~r Neumann May13,1997 4. Front, rear and side yards must be shown for the existing house. 5. The proposed parcels must be shown as Lot 1 and Lot 2. 6. The 75' wetland setback must be shown as a 75' wetland buffer. This area shall remain in its present state. Maintenance of the natural vegetation shall be the only use or activity allowed within this area. This condition shall be contained in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The final maps, six (6) paper prints and two (2) mylars, must contain a current stamp of Health Department approval and must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. The sketch plan has been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission, the Town Trustees, the Town's Engineering Inspector and the Mattituck Fire Department for review. You will be notified when the Planning Board receives responses from these agencies if any additional items are required. The Planning Board may require covenants and restrictions in addition to the ones mentioned above, upon review of the reports from the above mentioned agencies and upon review of the final maps. You will be notified if any additional covenants and restrictions are required. Draft deeds for each parcel must be submitted as part of the final submission. Each deed must describe the right of way and the provisions for access, The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that it is inadequate in size for a reservation of land for park and playground use. Therefore, a cash payment in lieu of land reservation will be required as per Section A 106-38 (e) of the Town Code. The amount to be deposited with the Town Board shall be $2,000 (two thousand dollars per vacant lot in the subdivision). Payment is required prior to any final endorsement of the subdivision. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. //4¢ Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS RICHARD G. WARD GEORGE RITCHIE LA~, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town I-tail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 25, 1997 Gerard A. Neumann, Esq. 13 Dater Lane Saddle River, NJ 07458 RE: Proposed Set-Off for Gerard A. Neumann and Kathleen A. Neumann SCTM# 1000-107-1-1 Dear Mr. Neumann: The Planning Board reviewed your letter of January 27, 1997, and would like to discuss your proposal with you. Please contact me when you return from vacation to schedule an appointment with the Planning Board. Sincerely., Planner GERARD A. NEUMANN ATTORNEY AT LAW 13 DATER LANE, SADDLE RIVER, NJ 07458 201-825-0195 GERARDA NEUMANN -- NY PRACTICE January 27, 1997 Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Melissa Spiro Re: Neumann Set-Off SCTM #100~-107-1-1 Thank you for your letter dated January 23, 1997. As stated in the application, there are no plans to subdivide the above-referenced property. It would be mere speculation for me to submit a sketch of a proposed layout for the subdivision of the entire property or the Long Environmental Assortment Form. The application for set-off, therefore, should be reviewed for what it is, namely, a site for our year-round residence. I will be away during February and trust that a review will be made during that time. I can meet with the members in March if necessary. Sincerely yours, Gerard A. Neumann, Esq. JAN 3 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS RICHARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 23, 1997 Gerard A. Neumann, Esq. 13 Dater Lane Saddle River, NJ 07458 RE: Proposed Set-Off for Gerard A. Neumann and Kathleen A. Neumann SCTM# 1000-107-1-1 Dear Mr. Neumann: The above mentioned proposal was reviewed by the Planning Board at the January 21, 1997, work session. The Planning Board would like to see a sketch of a proposed layout for the subdivision of the entire site prior to proceeding with the review of the proposed set-off. In addition, please note that a Long Environmental Assessment Form is required for this subdivision. I have enclosed the form for your convenience. ,. Please fee] free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. enc. GERARD A. NEUMANN ATTORNEY AT LAW 13 DAT£R LANE, SADOLE RIV£R, NJ 07458 201-825-0195 GERARDA NEUMANN -- NY PRACTICE January 8, 1997 Planning Board ~)~- "~ ~ Town of Southold ~.~ ~ P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re:Application for Neumann Set-Off Suff. Co. Tax Map 10OO-107-1-1 Dear Board Members: I am an attorney duly admitted to New York practice and submit herewith the subject application on behalf of my wife Kathleen, and sons James and Michael, owners of the referenced property. For the past 25 years we have been summer residents of the property's existing house. My wife and I plan to become year-round residents as soon as we can have a house built on the proposed set-off lot. We will then own the house and set-off lot only. Sons James and Michael will own the remaining parcel and structure. They have no immediate plans for it. The proposed set-off lot is less than 80,000 square feet to facilitate any future subdivision. A legal description of it will be provided after your tentative approval. Thank you for your review. My telephone number is (201) 825 O195. ~erard A. Neumann, Esq. Enclosures: 1. 12 survey maps by Young & Young 2. Filing fee check in the amount of $550 3. Letter re grading 4. Short Environmental Assessment Form 5. Application 6. Questionnaire 7. Legal description of property cc: Young & Young S 26 '39, AREA = 23,5500 ACRES 32,5 / Ellen M. Block LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1" : 600' TIE-IN SCALE 1':100' 200 Young & Young, Land Surveyors 400 Ostra~der Avenue, R~verhead, Ne~ York 11901 516-727-2303 SUFFOLK COUNTY DATE DEPARTMENT dAUPPAUOE, OF HEALTH SERVICES N.Y ~ls IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE PROPOSED REALTY SUBDIVISION OR DEVELOPMENT FOR IN THE WITH A TOTAL OF LOTS WAS APPROVED ON THE ABOVE DATE. WATER SUPPLIES AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES MUST CONFORM FO CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCFION AND ARE SUBJECT TO SEPARAflF PERMITS PURSUANT TO THOSE STANDARDS, THIS APPROVAL SHALL DE VALID ONLY IF ?cie REALTY SUBDIVISION/DEVELOPMENT MAP IS DULY FILED W~TH THE COUNTY CLERK WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THIS BATE. CONSENT IS HEREBY GIVEN FOR THE FILING OF THIS MAP ON WHICH THIS ENDORSEMENT APPEARS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNW CLERK IN ACCORDANCE W~TM PROVISIONS OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW AND THE SUFFOLK COUNTY SANITARY CODE. JOSEPH H. BALER, P E. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALl. COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND REQUIRE- MENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. THOMAS C WOLPERT, P.E. N,YS. LIC. NO. 61485 NOTE: IF AN APPLICATION IS MABE TO THE TOWN OF SOUll-iOLD FOR A MAJOR SUBDIVISION ON THE 23,BDO0 ACRES OF LANB SHOWN HEREON THE YEILD SHALL BE BASED UPON REDUCtND THE NUMRER OF LOTS BY ONE THAT A CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION WOULD HAVE PRODUCED ON THE ENTIRE 24.9088 ACRE PARCEL. StTE DATA: 1. TOTAL AREA - 24,9088 ACRES 2, ZONING USE DISTRICT: 'R-80' RESIDENTIAL LOW BENSITY A NOTE: 1. · = MONUMENT FOUND 2, TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREON IS FROM *'TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - FIVE EASTERN TOWNS" PREPARED FOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY BEPARIMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. "SET OFF" PREPARED FOR GERARD A. NEUMANN & KATHLEEN A. NEUMANN A~: MATTITUCK Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York Surf. Co. Tax Map: , lOOO ~ lO7 i 1 i 1 :DEC. 12, 1996 SCALE :1"= 100' dOB NO. '95-1069 SHEET NO :1 OF 1 "SETOFF. DWG" 50374