Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-106.-6-13.3 . ~ P~~)~~l G"'~'~'IW . ~""" ,t...:,.;;"..; f;':'iI;.;..:.,.~.....r....,...~,..... ~\;, . ~ (,.",.~, "'~"~~.i;~,!\ .-.( t;; T~~~>QllrSOU H 'LD u") \~~ ':';;ii;:'~,i.'~/'t- r-,.., Sm6E~II~' y ""~'.I., "f.,'Cv ~I s . Southold, N.Y. 11971 HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr.. Chairman Pm..1'iI'ml~IPGQlI:= JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI. Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. Jr. William F. Mullen, Jr. TELEPHONE 765 -1938 September 2, 1981 George H. Fisher Sr. Building Inspector Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Fisher: At a regular meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 31, 1981 at 7:30 p.m., the board took the fOllowing action: On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the proposed minor subdivision entitled Katherine Ebert, Mattituck HOldinq Compa.!lY, be processed as a "set-off" rather than a minor subdivision. Ayes: Raynor, Orlowski, Latham, Mullen Yours truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Susan E. Long, Secretary cc: Board of Appeals MINOR SUBDIVISION 1. 6 copies sketch plan received ,/ spot elevations ~ sent to planning Board 2. Meet with Planning Board 3. Required changes sent in writing 4. New submission received 5. Approval of sketch plan 6. Sent letter with resolution approving 7. Applica1:ion and fee If corporation, affidavit of ownership 6 copies of final map covenants and restrictions Description of property Note on plat that sanitation ans water facilities meet County Board of Health specifications Developer attend meeting (official submission) 8. Public Hearing (within 45 days) Advertised Affidavits of publication received 9. Action by planning Board (within 45 days) 10. Sent t.o County planning Commission Received county's recommendations 11. Filed covenants and restrictions received 12. Authorization and signing of map -_._~.,..__.. .,. . ........--.----.....'.'. ..,.... .. - i TOWN CI.ERK :;1 i TOWN OF SOUTlIOLU i Suffolk Couuly. New York 516 ' 765,1801 N? " G 430 ~ I --#~' ,,)"'''''001', N, v, 11971 ~ ,';h9PJ! RECEIVED OE2~ ~e-~/U ;" ~:;J1i1L J ; D..... · "",-,,"" I For ';7'Jt / __~ _~ - ~"-~ f/ - ? ..-/i.eA f i Judith T. Terry, T~rk ! ~~~~:~~,...,...,. .,.,.. ...#F h-;:A'~...J - --------- ---- ------- -- -----.--- ------- ~~MM ~ ---,._'_....-.~.. .'\...~~..,. ~ " ',. ~ . . Southold, N. Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 1, 1984 Mr. William Boscola, Jr, President Mattituck HOlding Company Mill Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Set-off for Ebert at Mattituck Dear Mr. Boscola: We are in receipt of your request to finalize the above mentioned set-off. The Board has reviewed this and we will hold your application until you have received the variance necessary from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Upon receipt of notice that this has been done, we will proceed with your application. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc: Board of Appeals . FORM NO.3 . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DlSAPPROY AL To ..}l1.~J.,..~~..~:..... .... .'>>\~.~~... ................. .-.m.~~.. ~:'i"'" .I.l.q~--:-;2,-... PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated .~ ~b.. n....., 19 .~~.. for permit to ~...:V.". '? ff. . . .~~ . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . at Location of Property .1. ..~'.L<.!, .. ~}. . w.~. 'r>1.4! l:...~. . .. .trJ.~c4. ... . .. ... . . House No. 'Ob Street p / Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ...1. 9. .Cp. . . . . Block .... .G. . . . . . . . Lot . 10. . .I. ~" a. . . Date ..~~h...ll....., 19.~.l\. Subdivision. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Filed Map No. ................ Lot No. .............,... is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds . .~;1.t,.. .~ . . ~.~. .I.Q.~.-: .'.2:-.~.. .~~-:.rt}.. .~. .~-.~. .~.. A!4.. JlA.r~i 1.~.. ?j~l'~'J.... .04..:c4 .~.. ~~. /.t:P. .-:.~!.. ~..V:. P~1 '.~l,^~, .I~O).. .~.o,... ~~.. .~.. \).~~.tJ... f~. >>+. .t.~1.~J.1. .a,~......... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .................................. ........... .'............................................................................. ...................... ........................................................................................... .............................................. .'........................................................................... ................................................................................................. -........... ..V~~k.~~~........... Building Inspector (' RV 1/80 . De ~ver Trawler Yacht SEP181984 ~*G./~ .PACEMAKER Post JM[@W1hmcdk IInull@fr ~1rfinu@ ~ ~Iluii~@mdl IInu~o September 17, 1984 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Sirs: We would like to finalize the set-off of Katherine Ebert's property. We have applied to the Board of Appeals for a variance due to in- sufficient area. Will you please put this request on your agenda. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, c.. ~)./ ~J~~. William Boscola Jr., Pres. MATTI TUCK HOLDING COMPANY G~i)\~ lMIlIlLlL IP2.(jJ)j,I,ID) 0 JMI&1l''lI'lI1l'1fJCl[, MIEW )f(Q)]E.l[, 1111~~dl 0 ~~11~~ dl~~~4\4\~@ ! , ~--- . , \ "'- , . ) ~ , " . - .:5 ~~' '" ., TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 12/2/81 DATE ....................... ACTION OF THE ZONING BO~D OF APPEALS Appeal No. 2895 by application Dated September 18, 1981 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Norman A. Reilly as agent for MI'S. Katherine Ebert for Mattituck Holding Corp. Box 434, Mattituck, NY 11952 To Appellant at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on October 15, 1981 the appeal was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your (X) Requ"est for variance due to lack of access to property N. Y. Town Law, Section 280-a Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance Request for a variance Lo the Zoning Ordinance I. SlJl~~P'eli~~~~~~~~~~&l&x~~x~1 exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .................... Section .................... Subsection .................,.. paragraph .................... of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) bf' ~~~ Public Hearin~: 10/15/81: Application of Katherine cEbert for Mattituck Hold1ng Corp., Mattituck, New York (by Norman A. Reilly as agent), for a variance for approval of access, New York Town Law Section 2aO-A. Location of Property: Right-of-Way off West Mill Road, Mattituck, NY; bounded north by Mill Road and Kil- lian; west by LeoGrande and Cox Neck Road; south by Chudiak, Mc- Gunnigle, Zeigler, DeMaula and North Drive; east by Mattituck Creek; and near Boscola. County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-106-6- part of 13.3. (SEE REVERSE SIDE) 2. VARIANCE. By resolution 01 the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce practical dIfficulties or unn~cessary hardship because (SEE REVERSE SiDE) (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because (SEE REVERSE SIDE) "" (c) The variance (doe' (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (would not) change the character of the district because (SEE REVERSE SIDE) CG:lk FORM ZB4 and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the prey ous CClSlons 0 e Ul 109 nspec or e firmed ( ) be reversed. RECEIVED AND FILED BY TEE SOUTaOLD TOV/N CLERK DATE/:L/3lo/ HOURJ':L/5lAlzoNl G BOARD OF APPEALS ~--~ ~l:;;('Town o.!.. ~thold By this appeal, appellant seeks aDproval of access over a right-of-way shown to b<.810. feet in width on surveYAor appellant " daloed ;ru]y 27, 1981.. 'rlWn.ght-of-way extends sou~and south- easterly!, from 'Nest lIill Road past appe llant I s property, and is and has heen utilized for access to the residence now or formerly of Boscola adjacent: southerly to the appellant I S property. It is the feeling of .the Board that thisJ:"ight-of-way should be improved to the normal road specifications adopted by this Board on March 22, 1979. In considering this appeal, the Board determines that the variance request is not subRtantial; that the circumstances herein are unique and the practical difficulties have been shown; that by allowing the variance no substantial detriment to adjoin- ing properties would be created; that the difficulty cannot be obviated by a method, feasible to appellant, other than a variance; that no adverse effects will be produced on available governmental facilities of any increased population; that the relief requested will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes of the zoning code; and that the interests of justice will be served by allowing the variance. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that the access be approved as requested in Appeal No. 2895 by Katherine Ebert for Mattituck Holding Corp., SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Such access road must have a width of not less than 15 feet and be cleared of all trees, brush and other obstructions to a width of 15 feet. 2. Such access road shall be improved in either of the following two methods: (a) Surfaced with a minimum depth of four inches of packed three-quarter-inch stone blend so as to afford access for emergency vehicles. Such stone blend may be either applied to the ground surface and shaped, or the surface may be excavated to permit the applicatcion of packed blend to a depth of four inches, OR (b) Have topsoil removed to a depth of eight inches and then filled with eight inches of a good grade stone and sand bank run. The surface shall then-be covered with a layer of two to four inches of three-quarter-inch stone blend, or in the alternative oiled with a minimum of four-tenths of a gallon of road oil per square yard. 3. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued for the con- struction of any buildings or structures, or any existing buildings or structures, on the premises to which this access is referred until all of the conditions set forth herein have been complied with. 4. Where the terrain of the land over which such access road is traversed is such that drainage problems may occur, the applicant and/or owner shall be required to construct such drainage facilities as may be recommended by the Town Engineer. 5. That this access road be approved by the Board of Appeals, Town Inspector or Town Engineer, or Town Building Inspector as to meeting the above requireme~ts. Location of Property: Off West Mill Road, Mattituck, NY; part of 13.3. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Doyen, Douglass, Goehringer, Sawicki and Grigonis. This resolution was unanimously adopted. * * * t\I:EROVED JEt s) 81. ~'4 A JIA Chairman Bg~rg (!!JApP0~1 a private right-of-way off the County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-106-6- I I - . ai.f- 3 I I / 1 Y I )~ ~~~ 1 ~~ fi~) ~ ~V\/ '~~ c~ ('~~1;~ ~ ~~j r~7 f /70Lft~~ ~~7 l~~. ~. ~~ ~~-C~ ~ .~-t<~ ~;:tA) ~~~v ~~~ I ~4C C<- -1Lc-r~ h ~ f'~ ~--A--'V o.-eL ~~. ,-jf~2- r~' r'.. ~~-~^ " ) / ~y. u:~ ~-h~~7~' .. . . APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (iinal) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as foHows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) ... ...t(~f.~-?-.v.;. .';'.~.... .f.:.~!'-.>;',f.:......... 2. The name of the subdivision is to be ................................................................................................ 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by' the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's offke as follows: Liber ........................ Page On ........................, Liber Page On ........................, Liber Page On ........................, Liber ........................ Page On ........................, Liber ........................ Page On ........................, as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ........................................ or as distributee ........................................................................ ................................................................................................ S. The area of the land is .?:f'i?).?.. acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except ................................................................................................ 7. The land is encumbered by .............................................................. mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber ............ Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. in original amount of $................ unpaid amount $................ held by .......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. address ...................................................... (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ............ Page ............... . . . .. in original amount of $. . . . . " . . .... ... unpaid amount $. . . . . . . .. . . . . ... held by ........................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. address ...................................................... . . (c) Mortgage recorded in Libel" ............ Page.................... in original amoun1 of $................ unpaid amount $................ held by ........................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . address ...................................................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the lanel except ........................ ..................... .................................................................... 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts .....4...... t ~f: I ~ ~ 1. ? ~.l..~. .1) f v; c. ......................................................................................... 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept ................................................................................... II. The applicant shall at his expense install aU required public improvements. 12. The land; (does) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is .............................................................. 13. Water mains will be laid by ...................' ......................................... aud (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ......................................... .................................... an d (a) (no) charge will be made for iustalling said lines. IS. Gas mains will be installed by aud (a) (no) charge will be .....................,...................................... made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be eXIstIng public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system. annex Schedule "Boo hereto. to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system. annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land whkh are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets ou adjoiniug sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings. the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "0". . . . . 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will he $. . . . . . . . .. as itemized in Schedule wE" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at ........ . . .. years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE ............................." 19.... /Y.'" .f/:~ t.~.r. ~.. H? (~.;. ':.1.. ,(".. ~............ (" ame of Applica t) , ~ J p. By.... ........ .........-;-+.....~....... (Signature and Title .. H.'c f!.. tfl:.. .M~.H\.-t.:.'.~ ./. ..~.}~:.JJ ':1 (Address) II r g :f STATE OF NEW~ORK. COUNTY OF ..~..............,ss: On the ...../ J. . ~.. .... day of ..... ~.d. . .. .., 19.//., before me personally came . .ddr&.~.I!J~?z. ').~......... to me known to be the individual described in and wh.; executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that .~...... executed the same. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ~-d/~~<'A.~~~;...... ~~~0blk'\ r.7 JUDITH T. TERRY Notary Public. State of New York No. 52..0344963 Suffolk County~ CommiSSIon Expires March 30, 1~~ < . ., . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . 55: On the .................. day .............. of ... . . . . . . ., 19. . . . . ., before me personally came . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de. pose and say that . . . . . . . . . . .. resides at No. .................................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . that .......................... is the .......... ................ of ............................................................................ the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that ............ knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpor- ation, and that ............ signed ............ name thereto by like order. Notary Public ................................................ HISTr~'JCT JaIlS: --(0) 1n order to OI1SI/"l' the questions in this short EAF it is assum~d that the preporer viII use, currently ovoiloble infornotion concerning the project and t1w lil:oly impocts of the action. It is nat cxpected that additional studie~, research or other investigations will b~ undertaken. (b) If any que~tion has been answered Yes the project moy be ~igni f icent and 0 co'"pl" led [environmental Assessment Form is necessary. (c) If all questions hove been answered No it is likely that this project is not significant. (d) fnviron~~ntul ^S5c~~rncclt 1. \'iTITp70~iecl result in 0 lorge physical change to the p,'oject site Or physicolly alter more /' thun 10 ocreS of land?....................... Yes~o 2. llill tl'cre bo 0 major chona'" to ony unique or - . ,ur,u:>u"l IOild form found on the site?.......... Yes/tJo 3. 1'Ii~1 ~roject alter or ~ove a large effect on - . ~ cXl:>t1ng body of water:....................... Y~s No 4. \1ill project hove a poten-tially large impact ----;-. --:- on groundwClter quality?....................... Yes 'tflo 5. l'lill pl'oject significantly effed drainage . - -,- flov on odjocent sites?........................ Yes /No 6. I','ill project affect any threatened or - -:::::. cndangered plant or animol species?.......... Yes No \'/ill project result in 0 rnaj<'r adverse effect - ,- on air quality?............................... . Yes /No fl. \'/ill project hove 0 major effect on vi'sual - - clwracter of the community or scenic views or . / vistas known tobe important to the community? Yes No 1-/111 project odversel)' lrnpoct ony site or --- structure of historic, prehistoric or . poleontoloyicol importance or ony site designated os 0 critical environmental eieo /' b)' 0 local agency?... ... .... .~,..~..~.~.~~... Yes No \'Iill project hove 0 major effect on existing - - or fu lure recreational opportunities?........ Yes /'No 11. \'Iill project result in r;]ajor traffic problems - - Or couse 0 major effect to ex5sting tronspc>rtation s)'stems?................ ...... Yes /No 12. \'Iill project re!JulClrly couse objectionable - - odors, noise, glore, vibration, or electrical disturbo~ce as 0 result of the project's operation?. .,.... .'............................ Yes /No' 13. I'/ill project have on)' ir.'poct on public health - ur . sa f ety? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes / No 14. \'iill project affect the existing community by - directly cousin!J 0 growth in permanent population of more thon 5 percent over 0 one year period Or hove 0 major ncgbtive effect On the choroCter of the community or / neighLorhood?... . ... . . . . . .. ..... .. .'.. .. . .... Yes No Is there public controversy concerning the - - pro j e c t ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ycs./ No PREPM1ER'S SJGI1^T6;==.:J~~ REPRESE1HI1~Gjy~1y,'~u lid II: 7- Let . 10. 15. ~).~:y" i.!,;\.'Jr.O>:~,.H:~,~Ti\L .,. -'--------. ;\ SSE S ~ :.~:: hi ! r"Ui';.i.I . 7. 9 . v.t, DATE . . Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 ~ ^ k...ft...~I:"'.( t b(lv4 I Re: ,/-...--/ tv-- Gentlemen: The fOllowing statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours trul v.f- ~ f(d-( d ~J. II. I J ; -A 1 Cc.