HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-99.-4-3PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Lathara, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-[938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCO'[T L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
MEMORANDL~I
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ~ ' ~
Proposed Site Plan for New Boat Rack Marina
Naugles Drive, Mattituck,
SCTM # 1000-99-4-3
June 12, 1992
On May 18, 1992, this Board received from your office a
dopy of a sketch site plan for a new marina on Naugles Drive in
Mattituck. We have reviewed the plan and offer the following
com~ents.
The property lies within the Marine Business II zoning
district, which calls for 80,000 square feet of lan~
per use. The subject property is 74,808 square feet
in area. Therefore, the project sponsors will have to
apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for an area
variance.
The site plan itself will need to show some additional
information at the time of submission, for instance
- the location and type of outside lighting (of which
none should shine beyond the property lines);
- the overhead utility lines should be shown as being
underground;
the locations of the existing pier and pile cluster
as well as the boundaries of the federal channel in
the inlet;
the location and terms of the thirty (30) foot
wide right of way that bisects the property from
east to west, as well as a listing of all known
parties having the right to traverse this
property.
topography lines to a distance of
two hundred (200) feet beyond the site.
a landscaping plan for the front, rear and side
yards;
- the location of the dumpster;
The Planning Board recommends that the project sponsor
contact Valerie Scopaz of this office to arrange for a
presubmission meeting to discuss such matters as how to improve
the internal traffic circulation pattern, the reasons for the
location of the loading ramp and the proposed dock extension
into the inlet channel, as well as to review the site plan
application requirements.. After the presuhmission conference,
your office will be copied with our coments.
cc: Building Department
Zoning Board of Appeals
TO. John M. Bredemeyer, III, President
FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
RE: Proposed Site Plan for New Boat Rack Marina
Naugles Drive, Mattituck,
SCTM # 1000-99-4-3
DATE: May 28, 1992
On May 18, 1992, this Board receive~ from your office a
copy of a sketch site plan for a new marina on Naugles Drive in
Mattituck. We have reviewed the plan and offer the following
comments.
1. The property lies within the iari~ B~sinesB II~zoning
district, which calls for 8~,000 s~uare feet of land per
use. The subject property is 74,808 square feet in area.
Therefore, the project sponsors will have to apply to the
zoning Board of Appeals for an area va~ia~ before the
Planning Board could act on the site plan application.
2. The site plan itself will need to show some additional
information at the time of submission. These are noted
below:
the nature of the landscaping proposed in the front,
rear and side yards shall be shown;
- the location of the dumpster shall be shown;
the location and t~10e of outside lighting (of which
none should shine beyond the property lines) shall be
indicated;
the overhead utility lines should be shown as being
underground;
the locations of the existing pier and pile cluster
should be shown.
the location and terms of the thirty (30) foot wide
right of way that bisects the propertyfromeast to
west should be noted, as well as a listing of all
known parties having the right to traverse this
property.
topography lines shall be extended to a distance of
two hundred (200) feet beyond the site.
The P~nning Board also has several questions and concerns
about certain elements of the plan. For instance, the site
plans shows the ~9~V~!~the~uae:~behind the bu~heed.
Obliteration of%~~gf~U~&~--the site ~oes ~t
i~sr to~ necessary.
Second, the location of the storage building relative to
the loading r~ seems inefficient. W~~ that tb~
dist~ce ~en the entr~ce to the stora~ bulling ~ the
r~. ~d for reasons o~ internal tra~Eic s~e~ ~d ~tter
tr~fic fl~, the entr~ce ~d exit ~i~ ~d the ~ng ~ea
should ~ sep~ate fr~ the traffic pa~ of the ~klif~ ~ving
the ~ats in ~d ou~ o~ the storage ~l~g. If the l~ation
of the ~rk~ng area and ~e stora~ ~ilding were to
reverse, m~y of these site inefficiencies ~ld
Third, the elevation of the storage building should be held
to the minimum required by the flood insurance program so as to
reduce the visual impact of the building on the surrounding
neighborhood. It would be most helpful if the project sponsor
would include elevation drawings showing the proposed building
facades, the exterior materials and the colors of the building.
Fourth, the pr~sed extension oft he fixed dock is of some
~;nOern for thwo reasons. The first is that it lies westward of
the property bour~, on the adjoining lot. The second is that
it extends too deeply into the channel, thus setting a precedent
for further intrusions into the channel not unlike the
situtation that has occured at Petersonts Marina. The close
proximity of this property to the sharp bend in the channel
argues against any further restriction of the already limited
manUevering room at this point in the channel.
Fifth, the location of the loading ramp should be given
more thought. The extension of the new dock adjacent to the
channel will result in a significant level of boat traffic just
beyond thebend in the channel. We also f°rsee the potential
for significant conflicts between boaters leaving and entering
the basin with boats being transported to and from the ran~.
l~ov~_hefamP to the westeznen~ of the basin would reduce th~
waterborne traffic at the entrance to the channel.
Sixth, the proposed parking area seems excessive. We would
like to discuss the possibility of landb~-king some of these
spaces, thus increaseing the amount oflandscaping on the site.
Please advise the applicant to contact Valerie Scopaz of
this office to arrange for a presubmission conference so that
these and other concerns may he discussed in more detail.
J J
l hd L-~-'r
II
IR
Dr
r "r
4- ~ 4-"'I cO.pT
"Alterallon of this Documem
,excnpt by ~ Licensed Profes-
',,Ikr~on~ or,~Mom donzi Engineer, Is Illeg~r'.
6f draatn~l ~,En. Section 7209, Subdivision
'~I~PPII'~vII ~il~]llili'lllldl N.Y. State Education Low