HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-12/03/1970$outhold Town Board of Appeals
SOUTHOLD, L. I., N. Y. 119'71
T¢ltphon¢ 765-~6~0
APPEAL BOARD
MEMBER
Robert ~'. GilUspie, Jr., Cha]r~an
Robert Ber~jen
Charles Gri~onis, Jr.
S¢r8¢ Doyen, gr.
Fred Huls¢, Jr.
~OU'THOL~ TOWN BOA~ OF APPEAT~
December 3, 1970
A-regular meeting of the ~outhotd Town Board of Appeals was he!fl at
7t30 P. M., Thursday, December 3, 1970, at the Town Office, ¥~in ~ad,
$ou~old, New Y~.
~ere were p~esent: Messes: E,be~t **. Gillispie, Jr., Chai~an;
Rebe~t Bergen; ~e~ ~lse, Jr.; ~arles Grigo~is~ J~.; Serge ~yeu, Jr,
Also p~eseut: Hewar~ Ter~ ~ll~img I~spect~r.
PUBIC ~NG: A rehearing ~u Appeal Ne. 1387 ~ 7:30 P.M. (~.~.T.),
~ applie~ion ef ~thte~n~ts Hi-~fgns, I~c., 564 Jer~ch~
~i~htew~, New Yor~, f~ a s~cial exception in a~co~da~ee ~ the Zoning
0rdiuan~e, Article IV, ~ction 408 (a), fe~ ~e~issieu t, e~ect eu premises
ground sign wi~ excessive'hei~t and area. ~eatiem ~ p~epe~ty: south
side ~f ~alu Road, G~ee~pert, New Y~'~, ~unde~ ~or~ by ~afu Head, east
by B~own-Giavamne~i, se~ by ~il~ead, west ~y Gia~ys CsaJ~.~
~e Chairman opened ~e hearing by ~ead~ng the application f*~ a
special exception, legal motice o~ hea~ing, ~fida~t attesting te its
publication in the ~ffieia~ newspapers, and notice to the applicant.
~ C~I~ ~, Is the~e anyone prese~ who wi~es to spea~ fo~ ~is
application?
M~ T~0~ ~: I br~S ~e diagrams *f aue~e~ si~.
~nze ~ewed ~iag~s te the ~ar~.~ came ~ap wi~ a eenfe~i~g sign
~ 73 sq. ft. ~at~s under the 81~ sq. ft. ~ieh is allowed. We had
men$ioued a 16 ft. p~le te clea~c~s.
MR. HULSE: The only thing you are applying for is excess height?
THECHAIEMAN: We discussed the fact that he needs extra hei~ht
for large- trailers to-clear the signs. The applicant has revised his
application to conform as to size b~t will require a special c~ndition
as to height.
MR. HULSE: Will there be outside spotlights? They can be a
hazard.
MR. BENZE: They will be illuminated; this is internal ill~mina-
rich. The spotlights will come off.
THE CHAIP~LN: Is there anyone present who wishes to spea~ against
thi s application?
applicant requests pe~mi
excessive height located
The Board finds that the
and that it will be inte~
height so that large tra:
(There was no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Beard Finds that the
~sion to erect on premises Eround sign with
south side ef Main Read, Greenpo~t, New York
sign will confor~ as to size, being 73 sqJ~ ft.,
~nally illuminated. The applicant needs extra
~.lers can clear the signs.
The Board finds tha' the public convenience and welfare and justice
will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neigh-
borhoOd property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently
or ~abstantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed.
On motion by Er. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
EESODVED ~ithtewn~ s Hi-Signs, Inc., 564L Jericho T~_ npmke, ~mithtewn,
New York,~be ~GR~NTED permission te erect on premises g~ound sig~ with
excessive height on.property located south side of Main Road, Greenport,
New York, subject to the following conditions:
!. The bottom oF this sign shall be no closer than 16 feet from
grade, and mo closer than ~ feet to any property line.
2. The to~p of the sign shall be no higher than 21 ft. 6~ i~ches.
Vote of the Boamd:
Grigenis, Beyen. _
Ayes:-Eessrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse,
PUBLIC ~EARING2 Appeal No. 1389 -7:45 P.M. ~E.S.T.), upon
application of Ja~ies Homan a/¢ Braun Oyster Company, Maim.~Read,
Cutchog~e, New York, for a variance in~Accordancewith the ~oning
Ordinance, A~tic!e X, ~ection 1007, ~Absection (e), for permission
to constr~ct addition to existing non-conforming b~siness building.
Location of property: south side of Main Road, Cutchog~e, New York,
b~anded north by ~ain Head, east by Allan Glover, south by B. Orlewski,
west by A. J. Sabatelli & Homart. l~ee paid
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a
variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting te its publication
im the official newspapers, and ~otice te the applicant.
~ ~I~N: Is there anyone present wh. ~es te speak ~or this
applic.atien? ..... .
~R, J~ HO~: Yes, I ~ J~es Homan acting for Braun Oyster
Company.
(~e ChaIrma~ read f~em the previous application, Appeal N~. 831,
24th,
dated Ma~ch 1966.
~ C~I~: A ~onditiou that was made in the last action when
this building was enlarged was that no ~rther additions Would be
granted unless the lot was enlarged. ~e ~ard ~ouud that the ~siUess
e~isted long before enactment oF the ~ui~g 0~dinance. In the
lng o~ the previous decision a condition was that additional property
be acquired.
MR. HOEAN: ~e have purchased the adjoining lot o~ the easterly
side of our property. We are an outlet for approximately 100'baymen.
I consider this request a natural request for expansion and I feel
that I would be lacking as a business man if I did not grew with the
T~E CHAI~: I think we investigated the business pretty
theroughly~ in 1966..In fact, I believe the new Easter Plan will
include your business, and also the area across the street.
THE CHAI~N: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against tb~ s application?
(There was no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Beard finds that the
applicant requests permission to construct addition to existing non-
conforming business building located south side of'Main Road,
C~tchogue, New York. This is a na~ral growth ef business which
serves the ~ocal com~nity~ T~e area wi~ ~er$1y be zone8 ~siness
under the new z,ui~ ordinance. ~e applicant has. ~rchased the
adjacent let on the easterly si~e ef his property. ~e business has
been in existence for ma~y years and is an asset to local harem who
ma~e thei~ living f~om Town waters.
The Beard finds that strict application of the Ordinance will
produce practical difficulties er unnecessary hardship.; the hardship
created is unique and would be shared by all properties alike in
the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same mse district;
and the variance does observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will
not change the character of the district.
Om motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was~
EES0LVED James Homan a/c Braua 0yste~ Company, Main Road,
Cutchag~e, New York,_ be GRAN~ permission t~ c~st~ct a~ditien
to existing nen-co~e~ing business building as applied fo~ on
property located ~u~ side of Mai~ Road, Cutcho~e, New York.
_
Vote of ~e ~ard: Ayes:- Messes: Gi!Iispze, ~rgeu, Hulse,
Grigoni s, ~yen.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1390 - 8:00 P.M. (E.~.T.), upon
application of James & Elizabeth Giambalv0, 72 Columbia. Read,
Rockville Centre, New York, for a variance in accordance with the
Zoning Ordinance, Article iii, ~ection 303, and Article ~, Section
1000A, for permission to separate lots and use as separate lots with
less than 100 ft. frontage. ~eeation of pro~rty: 'west sid~ of
North 0akwood Road, Eot-#~s 28 and 29 of ~aurel Park Subdivision,
Laurel, New York. i~ee paid '$~.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for
a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its ~
pmblication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant.
TEE CHAIRMAN:
this application?
Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for
~R. JANEt GIA~BAAV0: I might mention that my purpose in Being
here is that our present home is om L~t # 29 and is clearly away
from the dividing line of this lot. ~.I have six children and hope
that I may be able to use the other lot for one of my children in
the future. I have no plans to dispose of the lots.
THE ¢~I~MAN: You have bought the two lots. You are a new
owner.~ Di~ the former owner own both lots also?
MR. GIA~BALV0: Yes.
MR. BERGEN: How m~ch clearance do you have between the house
and Lot Nee 28.
MR. GIA~BALVO: On the survey it lo~ks like it's adequate.
(2~r. Giambalvo indicated s~rvey to the Beard°)
THE CHAI~N: ~he width of the lot 'is 80 ft. If a house were
located on vacant lot ~ 28, our usual conditions w~uId be that there
be no request for dimisishing of side lines. The.y are 10 feet on one
smde and 15 feet on the other. If it'~ s 80 feet wmde, this would
leave %5 feet. They can both be 12½ feet bat not less than 1elect
ou either side. You can check with the B~ilding Inspector if you
ever do build a house. ~aere is quite a~ variation in the setback of
houses there. Probably a factor would be that the two adjoining
houses on either side would determine your average setback. It
looks like it would be adequate,
THE CHAI-Wf~AN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against this application?
J0~EPHINE ~YGST~R: Since my husband has been working and there
was such short mp~tice ~in the papers.., it was less than a week to
look at this.., my objection would be that'-I think there is a
new ~uffolk ~ Health Code in regard to cesspools; and living-on
lots of 000 sq. ft. You have it listed as a i~Abdivision.
I was atthe ToWn Hall to look at assessed valuations. ~en we in-
quired we were told that that property was not for sale. l~hen Dr.
Wiederman bought it he said that his wife liked privacy and he wanted
to leave it as it was. I live on Lot ~ 27. I moved there in 19%6
prior to subdivisions and t~wn ordinances. I think you have conserva-
tion of property value. I want to know what will happen to my
property. Dr. Wiede~man had a variance te set this house back. I
don~-t know where the driveway will go in, and where the cesspool will
be.
TEE CHAIP~[~_N: These are matters for determination by the Board
of Health.
EP~. EUGSTEH: I am obje6tiug-to the Suffolk County Health Code
in the placement of cesspools. Ours i~ in the front and his is in
the center. Then there's that development planned iu back of the
farm. I have walked all around Laurel, not by car, by foot. ~hat
will happen to my water supply? · I think the Ellng on cesspools and
water has to be 125 feet.
TEE CH~_T ~_~MAN:
120 feet.
JO~EPHEUG~TEdR: ~If I have to move my point, where will it be?
It will be a sewage problem or a new point.
THE CHAIHM~N: The Board of Health has complete control.
ER. EUGSTEH: What do i do with my point?
MR. BERGEN: You have to go to the Board of Health and find out
where the~ point can go.
ER. E~GSTER:
MR. 2E~:
ER. EUGSTER:
Where can I move it?
The Board of Health will tell you.
Nhich way do i go?
MP~. EUG~ER: The houses to the rear will a~fect it.
MR. BERGEN: Your lot is 200 feet deep.
MR. EUGS~ER: B~t I might want to build i~ the back.
MRS. EUGSER: I have been at h~arings h~re where they came in and
appealed, and I figured I have the same right° Next time I will get a
lawyer.
~R. EUGSTW~J~: 200 Feet, and i can't build anything in back.
MRS. EUGene: My husband and I have refrained from building.
"-TEE CHAthAM: Many of the laws in the Town of ~outhold are on
plots ~that are too small. We can not change what has happened in
the past. If there is no way to enlarge a lot or make it compatable
with the Ordinance then that is what the B~ard of Appeals is For.
MPpm. ~UGSTER: We live in a wooded area. If this gentleman
b~ilds there that mean's that more trees will be chopped down and
that doesni~t help the rain table. You might just as well be living
back where you came
MR. BERGEN: You want to be able to use your property, but you
don~t want your.neighbor to be able to use his.
MR. E~GSTER: i~m afraid I won't be able to use mine a~ter he uses
hie.
MR. GIAMBALV0: i am not putting up two houses.
1/R~. EUGSTER: When was this divided? Dr. ~iederman bought in
1960. I think~ somewhere in a hearing I heard that you have to be
the owner at the time the 0~dmnancew ' went into effect.
THE CHAI~_~: You see our minimum is 12,500 sq. Ft. and both of
his lots exceed .12,~00 sq. ft. He exceeds by at least 30% on both
lots. We have just inserted another condition that he will not ezpaud
the sidelines.
~HB. EUG~TER:
to expand.
If it were not divided he would still have room
THE CHAIEMAN: ~nat~s his privilege.
MRS. EUG$'~ER: People Who have the money to do all these things
have first preference. ~nere is other land available. There is Farm
land behind us and farm land across the cree~.~ Most people bought a
lot and a half or two lots and when Dr. ~iederman bought, he was a
nuisance. I can see that when you have been living there for some
years it could be a hardship but if you buy is it a hardship the next
day? I ~ave a very deep yard and I might want to convert our garage.
~ CHAIP//AN: This is no time to bring that question up.
ERS.'EUGSTER: ~e want to know what g~arantee we have after he
builds his house, There is no ~arantee that he will live there. He
might want to ma~e a profit. ~iost people who have moved to Laurel .
made sure that they had acreage and zoning covering them. i~m Just
going to tell this Boa~d right now that we consider it a residential
area. If you want changes, I am willing to make changes too.
MR. ~'JG~R: What~do I do when I want t~ expand? We have a
garage we could convert.
THEC
HAIHMAN. You would have to separate the lines out.
MR. EUGSTER~: ~ppose we wanted two houses? You are allowed by
footage, square feet- 12,500 sq. ft.
THE CHAIBMAN:
sq.
If you wanted two houses, you would have 25,000
~CHAPJ~ HAMIY~L: I would like to address the Board. I am a
property~ owner and~I have been iu Laurel for Forty. years so I have
observed many changes.
~ CHATRMAN:
nothing specific.
lots.
You are speaking "againSt~ in general te~ms,
This is a normal application, a man who owns two
MR. EA~LL: I am saying that this is contrary to the general
welfare of the_community and is against the plan for that community.
In the first place, it alleges that most of the lots are singly ~wned.
Just to the north, Christy owns two lots. Right opposite there are
four lots that are held in individual ownership. The property in
question is a way down in a hollow°
TM~'CHAI~N: Most of the lots are held separately. You could
have four lots and still use four l~ts separately. I would have to
disagree. Some people have two lots, some three, some have four.
MR. HAMI~: We realize that 80 ft. x 200 ft. is too small.
do not want to perpetuate this.
THE CHAI_~M~J~: I don~t think there is any law where you could
prevent this lot' from being divided. We have had examples where they
separate with 20,000 sq. ft., and go up ~to 40,000 s~. ft. In cases
where there is a sit, marion like Mr. Giambalvo has, the court has held
that he has a right to divide these lots.
MR. HAMIY~L: He is not even the owner of record.
owned by Dr~.Wiederman. I looked at the records.
It is still
M~. GIAMB~r~V0: I have a copy of the contract.
THE CEAi~N:~ ~$e will take a look at it. (~r. Giambalvo showe~
the ¢o~py of Contract to the Board.)
MR. GIAMBA~V0: The house on the north, I feel, is on one lot.
MP~. ~UG~TER:' It is centered. When they give a sideyard vari-
ance I hope it. is~towards your lot and not ours.
MR. HAMIt~: How do you justify the fact that right to the rear
they have to.have lots of 40,000 sq. ft., and this man has 32,000 sq.
ft. to start with?
THE OHAIL~N: i Will explain once more. It is impossible to
pass or establish an. OrdinAnce which Will fit every town in New York
State. In a Town like this, 300 years old, there are all sorts of
situations. That's why there is a Board of Appeals to establish a
uniform procedure to handle situations like Mr. Giambalvo~s. I can't
tell you any more. You are welcome to consult your lawyer. The
courts hold that if he is denied this application he can appeal it and
get it. We do not act.
MHS. EtYGSTER: Is his hardship children or income? W]~ere is the
na_dsn~p? He has not even lived in the area. My famil, y doesn't even
come out on vacations any more. We were a rural area.
'ER. HAMILL: There is going to be a development opening up to the
rear. Ha could buy additional land there.
~. EUGSTEE: We might just as well have moved to ~evittown.
~ CHAIRMAN: Are there any other questions?
(There was no response.)
A~ter. investigation and inspection the Board finds that the
applicant requests permission to separate lots and use as separate
lets with less than 100 foot ~frontage on property located west side
of North Oakwood Read, Laurel, New York. The Board finds that
applicant has l ,900 sq. ft. in each lot or a t~tal ef 32,000 sq. ft.
and e~ceeds the minimum of 12,~00 sq. ft. by at least 30% on both
lots. There is an existing dwelling on Zot ~ 29. ~ot ~.28 is vacant.
The two. lots have been owned jointly but. applicant wishes to separate them
into single ownership and use them separately.
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will
produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hards~
created is unique and would be shared by all properties alike in~
immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district;
and the variance does observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will
not change the character of the district.
On motion by Er. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVED James and Elizabeth GiambaivS, 72 Columbia
Rockv_lle~Centre, New York, be GRANTED permission to separate icl
and use as separate lots with less. than 100 feet frontage-as appl~
for. !~cation of property: west'~s~de of Nomth 0a~woed Read, I~t
28 and~29 of Laurel Park ~bdivision, Laurel, New York. This~app~
tion is granted subject to the following condition:
The condition is that the applicant shall not be
granted any sideyard variances in the ~ture.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:-Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hutse,
Grigonis, Doyen. ~
ip
he
ed
ica-
i~JBLIO HEARING: App~eal No. 1391 - 8~15 P.M. (E.~.T.), upo~
application o£~M.~E.~ Smith-Miller, Box 304, Bedford, New York a/c
John Guest, Fishers Island, New York, for approval of access over
private road ~in accordance with the ~tate of New York TOwn ~aw,
~ectiou 280A. Location of pz~perty: private road (Crescent..Avenue)
off northwesterly side of Fox Avenue ~unning roughly parallel to
Fibbers Island Sound through the area known as North Hill Section,
said private road extending i~ an easterly direction would eventually
connec to the Town owned and maintained part of Crescent Avenue which
extends northerly from the business section on ~ox Avenue. ~ee paid $%.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for
approval of access, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to
its publication in the officis1 newspapers, and notice to the applicant.
THEUP~IE~AN: Maybe I should state that the location is on a
private road which appears to be several thousand feet long. (The
Board studied map and photographs). The access appears to be %0 ft.
wide. It's an irregularly shaped, road°
THE C~IEMAN:
this application?
Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for
~tR. HOWARD T~P~°J~, Building Inspector: I would like to introduce
John Guest, Mr, Smi~h-Miller~ and Mr. Phillip Mattel.
MR. PHII~IP ~ATTEL: ~ile I am an attorney, I did not submit
the application, I think the Board i's familiar with the problem.
This is a private road that goes on around to a public road.
Basically, it's a question as to what requirements the Board would
have as far as imp~wovements are concerned. ~fr. Guest is perfectly
willing to make any improvements. I know that on the 26th of October
we were before the Planning Board. A small p6rtion of this land was
conveyed to ~Russell. They said then that there would be no building
permits issued until some steps were made to improve and make the
road passable from Fox Avenue to whatever houses would be built.
We are here to see what you require.
TBE C~IEMA3~: As you know, the Board of Appeals has the right
of approval of access and our usual p~oblem is the condition of the
road, and half the time there is the fact that it has been used for
many years but is not i~ good condition for the use of fire trucks,
ambulances, etco~ so we make a determination of approval of access
upon seeing it and the condition of the highway.
In cases where it has to be improved, we manage to avoid setting
up road specs, by r~quiring the Building Inspector to indicate his
approval. ~ometimes we suggest gravel or~ clearing some of the trees
from the woods where a fire truck can,t ma~e a turn.' Other towns
are more strict, o~ I learned about Riverhead; they require a black-
top road, a~d in subdivisions they now require coacrete roads. ~his
is for open development areas.
-10-
THE CHAIItMAN: (ReFerring to photographs) This is the road that
is tn~use._ It_ appears that the whole thing is ~0 Feet wide so
eventually the Town could take it over because it goes From public
road to public road.
.MR. MATTEL: I h~ve a description in my briefcase here. T~nis
was laid out. when it was Amy property. The ~0 foot right-of-way
was used by the Army. It is owned by a utility company. This is
the underlying title of. this. I have no question in my mind that
in time if the Town wanted it the utility company would deed it over to
them. It is a liability-to them. All of this is vested in the P. I.
Utility Company, the right of easement over it. I have a copy of the
Title companyis guarantee. He has the right to grade and maintain it
at his own expense. This is specifically stated in the guarantee.
(Mr. Mattel read from. the Title Company g~arantee). ~He has the
right to grade, maintain and construct roadway and almo the right
to lay conduits and erect poles for electricity.~ Russell has the
same basic title, which gives him the same right-.of-way, and the
same right to maintain and construct roads.
TEE CHAIB~N: K-as your parcel larger than this 14 acres that
is mar.ked_here?
TEE CHAIRMAN: FOr the record, when did you buy the property?
MR. GUEST: in i967. By deed i~om Leon Ross,- 1/24/68; recorded
1/29/68.. ~This_is~an acquisition From the Receiver of the U. S. A~my
who took the property over from Leon Ross.
T_BE CHAIRMAN: The access you are requesting is from Fox Avenue
to the property.
MR. HOWAED~EP~Y, B~itding Inspector:
improved ~o a width of 16 feet.
This will have to be
THE CHAIRMAN: it's State law. You will have to-improve the
road bend .so i~t is ~i~table for the passage o~ emergency vehicles
to the extent of 16 feet in width. Whatever access is granted 'here
would apply only to Mr. Guest. It would not give access to anyone
else. Do you own raore property there, Mr. Guest?
MR. GUEBT: 14 acres.
MR. MATTEL: Mr.-~Zablouski iS planning a subdivision in this area.
~hen, as and if he comes along he would have to come i-n and make im-
provements. Russell does n6t plan to build-'~in the forseeable future
but I assume it would not prevent Russell from building if he wanted to.
It is the same entrance as ~r. Guest*s.
THE CHAI~N: The Board.may issue a permit SUbject to the con-
dition thmt any such. decision shall be subject to review. The word
"access" shall mean the prOpe-r~cy on which the building is located.
The road has to be made passable for fi~e trucks, etc. Fifteen feet
should be sufficient for that purpose.
THE CHAIEMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against this_ application?
(There was no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Board Finds that the
applicant requests permission for approval of access over private
road in accordance with the State of Ne~ York Town Law, Section 280A.
Location of property: private road (Crescent Avenue) off.north-
westerly side of Fox Avenue, t~ishers Island, New York. The Board
finds that applicant can not reach his property by public road and
bought the property in the belief that he would be able to build a
private dwelling on it; and that there are two other dwellings
whose only access is this road. The applicant plans to build a
private dwelling which would not -~ubstantially increase traffic on
this road or change the essentially r~ral character of the area.
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would
produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hard._~b~ip; the hardship
created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in
the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district;
and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood,
and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance.
0n motion by ~r. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVF~D M. E~ Smith-Miller, .Bo~ 304, Bedford, New Tork a/c
John Guest~ Fishers Island, New York, be GRANTED approval of access
over private ~oad. (Cresc?nt .Ave~.e), the right-oF-wa~y r~nning north-
westerly off ~ox ~enue ~o the entrance of Mr. Guest s property and
consisting of ~four courses, 16%~ feet; roadbed 50 feet; subject to
the Following conditions:
t. Fifteen feet of ~is access shall be improved to the eztent
that it is useable in all weather conditions for emergency use of
Fire t~cks or ambulances.
2. That it shall apply solely to the applicant.
3. A f~rther condition is that it is subject to the approval of
the Building Enspector.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:-Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse,
Grigonis, Doyen. _
*COREECTION: On Appeal No. 1384, November 12, 1970, 8:4~ P.M.
~.S. ~. ),
On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED ~alvatbre Vindigni, Gi_lette Drmve, ~ast Marion, New
York, be GRANTED permission to const~ct addition to existing dwelling
with insufficient sideyard area located west side of Gillette Drive,
~ast Marion, New York, subject to the following conditions:
*COREECTiON (Co nt ' d):
1o That the building remain a single family
re side nco.
*2. That there be no less than i0 £t. sideyards
on either side oF the building.
Ayes:-Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse,
Vote of the Board:
Grigonis, Doyen.
On motion by Mr. Gitlispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED'that the Einutes 0f the South~td Town Board of Appeals
dated November 12, 1970, be approved as submitted, s~bject to
correction of Appeal No. 1384; and subject to minor correction.
Vote of the Board:
Grigonis, Doyen.
Ayes:-Messrs: Gittispie, Bergen, Hulse,
On motion by Mr. Bergen, sec. uded by Mr. Gillispie, it was
~0LVED that the next regular meetinE of the Bouthold Town Board
of Appeals will be held at 7:30 P.M., Thursday,~December 17th, 1970,
at the Town Office, Main Road, ~outhold, New York.
Vote oF the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse,
Grigonis, Doyen.
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by M~o Doyen, it was
~E~0LVED'~that the S0~thold Town Board of Appeats set 7:30 P,M.,
(E.S.~.),~.Thursday, De6'embe~ 17th, I970, at the Te~ 0ffice,~Main
Road,~ ~euthold, N~W Y~k, as ~e time and pl~e of hearing upon
~pplfcstiou oF Ha~ol~ Kebabs, Eas~wood D~ive ~xtensi~n & Holden Avenue,
~tcho~e, New York, for a variance in.a~cordance ~th the ~ning
0rdi~ance, ~ticle III, ~ection 300, ~bs~ction (6), and ~ticle III,
~ection 309, Fo~ permission to const~ct accessory~building in sideya~d
area with ineFFicient setback. ~cation eF property: Eastwood Drive
E~te~sion & Holden Avenue, ~t ~ ~ of Eastweed ~states, ~ection~II,
~leets Neck, Cutcho~e, New~ To~k.
Vote of the B~ard: Ayes:- I~essrs: Gitlispie, Bergen, Hulse,
Grigonis, I~yen~
On motion by M_r. Bergen, seconded by ~r1. Doyen, it was
~OLVED-~that the ~buthold Town Board of Appeals set 7:40 P.M.,
(~.S.T.), ~ursday, Decembe~ 17th, I970, at the Town OFf~ce, Main
Road, Southold, New YOrk, as the time and place of hearing upon
application of Ches.ter 0rlowski, Pequash Avenue, Cutchog~e, New
Y~rk a/c James Manning, JackSon Street, New Suffolk, New York, for a
variance'-in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section
$00, SubseCtion (6), and Article III, Section 309, for permission to
construct accessory building in frontya_~d area. Iocation of property:
south side of Jackson Street, New ~uffolk, New York, bounded north by
~ackson et.feet, east by John P. Manning, south by Peconic Bay, west
y E. I~arvtn.
Vote of the Board:- Ayes:- Messrs: Gitlispie, Bergen, Hulse,
Grfgoni s, Doyen.
EES0L .VED. that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:00
(E.S.T.),_~Thursday, Decembe~ 17th, 1970~ at the Town Office, Main
Road, Southold, New York, as the~time and place of hearing upon
application bf Dri-Gen Realty Corp., North 0a~ood H, ad, Laurel,
New York, for a~variance i~accordance with the ~n~ng Ordinance,
Article X, Section 1008 (last paragraph), for permission to
~bdivision for multiple.residence dwellings with increased density.
Location of p~operty: (Map of Greeuport Hemes) south side of Main
~?ad, Gr&enoort, New York, bounded north by~lain Road, east~by
Nmnth Street, s~uth by L. I. Railroad Company, west by A. Cassi~.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse,
Grloon~ s, Doyen.
Meeting was adjourned at 9:4~ P.M.
V ED Re.spectfully submitted,
~ .~/.~,~ D'i~' . ~ ~~w~asjo_~ie McDermott, Secset~Wy~
~h~~~~' Bouthold Town ~ard qf Appeals
Eobert W. ' ' '
Gmllmspme, Jr., Chairman