The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-103.-7-7Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 24, 1988 Mrs. Patricia Sujeski 1000 Stillwater Avenue Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: Ann Saba SCTM 9 1000-103-7-7. Dear Mrs. Sujeski: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, February 22, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deny the set-off of Ann Saba for the set-off consisting of 28,098 square feet from 1.274 acres located off Stillwater Avenue in Cutchogue SCTM ~ 1000-103-7-7. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, J~' CHAIRMAN~ SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD jt M__INOR SUBDIVISION 1. 6 copies sketch plan received spot elevations__ sent to Planning Board 2. Meet with Planning Board 3. Required changes sent in writing 4. New submission received 5. Approval of sketch plan 6. Sent letter with resolution approving 7. Application and fee If corporation, affidavit of OWnership 6 copies of final map Covenants and restrictions Description of property Note on plat that sanitation ans water facilities meet County Board of Health specifications Developer attend meeting (official submission) 8. Public Hearing (within 45 days) Advertised_ _Affidavits of publication received 9. Action by Planning Board (within 45 days) 10. Sent to County Planning Commission Received County's recommendations 11. Filed COvenants and restrictions received 12. Authorization and signing of map DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES (~JI~I.TY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M,P,H. March 24, 1988 Mrs. Patricia Sujeski 1000 Stillwater Avenue Cutch~gue, NY 11935 ~ear Mrs. Sujeski: ' Subject: Board of Review Hearing - March 4, 1988; Proposed Subdivision of Sujeski, (T) Southold (SCTM 1000-103-7-7) At the hearing held on March 4, 1988, you had an opportunity to present your appeal of the department's ruling on the subject appli0a~ion. In accordance with the provisions of Article 2, Section 220, of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, the determination of the Board of Review is as follows. Based on the information submitted, the Board denied the request for a variance for the 2-lot development. Article 6 is intended to protect groundwater by establishing limits on density of population. Approval of this development would have an adverse effect on the groundwater. Very truly yours, ~d of Review JHB/jb cc: Mr. Walter G. Lindley MS. Susan Windesheim Mr. Charles G. Lind Town of Southold Planning Board 348-2786 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTh SERVICES COUI~Y Of SUFFOLK Patrick G. Halpin SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. February 16, 1988 1000 Stillwater Avenue cutehoque, Mew York 11935 Re: Proposed Subdivision of Sujeski, (T)Southold scT. 1000-103-7-7, Dear Mrs. Sujeski: · Your request to appear before the Board of Review of the Suffolk Department of Health Services has been received. The review of this case has been scheduled for March 4, 1988, at 10:30 a.m., in the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Conference Room, County Center, Room N-204, Riverhead. You and interested parties are requested to appear, with or without counsel, and you may produce any information or evidence concerning the above referenced property. Very truly yours, Robert A. Villa, P.E. Chairman ~ Board of Review RAV:cah cc: Mr. Joseph H. Baier, P.E. Mr. Paul J. Ponturo, P.E. Mr. Walter G. Lindley Ms. Susan Windesheim Mr. Charles G. Lind Town of Southold Planning Board (516) 548-3312 COUNTY CENTER Ext. 12 ~tVERHEAD N ¥ 11901 Town Board of Appe~ -16- June /3, 1985 Reg No. 3357 DR. JAY P. AND M. SLOI'KIN, coutinued:) Meet ing Va_O_ - ¼om '. Sawicki, it was ~L]C~ ~ hO~ RESOLVED, to grant the relief rec for a proposed addition of 15½ ft. x ~(~)$J-~. ~CL4Op~C4;L-(~-F~ Application of DR. JAY P. AND M. SLOTt ~ ~ -~ ~2 C-O-N~JTIONS: ~ ~. 1. Conditions (a), (b), (d), (e ~)~.6. incorporated herein; 2. There shall be a minimum of O- which shall be in compliance with Sec ,= Code. ~ Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messr Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was duut,~ ,~ unanimous vote of all the members. Application for~by P. Sujeski), 1000 Stillwat,.,r Avenue, Cutchogue, NY for a V~-rlance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for approval of insufficient area and width of lots in this proposed two-lot division located at the South (westerly) Side of Stillwater Avenue, Cut~hoguu, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 103, Block 07, Lot 007. Following deliberations, the board made the rolls, wing finding,~ and determination: WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on May 2, 1985, in the Matter of the Application of ~N~ SA~_A~, Appeal No. 3336, at which no objections were received for the record; and WHEREAS, the board has considered all testimony and documentation in the record concerning this application, including a recommendakion from the Southold Town Planning Board dated March 18, '1985, Lha~ this board approve this application since iL conforms with the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, the board made the following finding, is of Fact: 1. The property in question is located at the south(west) side of Stillwater Avenue, Cutchogue, NY with a total acreage of 1.274 Southold Town Board of Apl -17- June 13, 1985 Re~ (Appeal No. 3336 ANN SABA, continued:) Meeting acres and 339.52 frontage along Stillwater Avenue and is located in an "A-Residential and Agricultural" Zoning District; 2. By this application, appellant proposes a division of the 1.274 acres into two lots (set-off division, 106-13) as shown on map prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. December 20, 1984, and as follows: (a) Lot #1 to be set off with 28,098 sq. ft. in area and 160.0 ft. lot frontage and is vacant; (b) Lot #2 with an existing single-family dwelling set back 83' from its front property line and 35' from its south side line, with 27,397 sq. ft. in area and 179.52 ft. lot frontage; 3. Article III, Section lO0-31, Bulk Schedule of tt~e Zoning Code requires a minimum of 80,000 sq. ft. in area, 175 ft. lot frontage (width), for each newly created parcel of land. 4. In viewing the character of the neighborhood, most of the neighboring lots of a similar size or smaller than that proposed by this application, and therefore lends itself to the granting this application. In considering this application, the board determines that the application as applied be denied for the following reasons: (1) the board of appeals is without authority to grunt this area variance in the absence of proof of practical difficulties or significant economic injury; (2) the water table in this area is fragile and such a division of land with lots of less than 40,000 sq. ft. in area will require reviews and ~t~pr~)val under Article VI, "Realty Subdivisions and Developments" by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services; (3) the manner in which the difficulty arose and in considering all of the above, the interests of justice would be served by denying the variance as applied· Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded hy Mr. Grigonis, it was -- ,RESOLVED, that Appeal No 3336 in the Matter ~ the Appli~at' of ANN SABA for approval of insufficien i.o t area and width of lo~.. ~hi~ p~-~-D-~-~ed set-off division of land, I~E AND ItEREUY IS DENIED WI FHOUT PREJUDICE to reapply after' iiiei, t o-f--H-~ ~lzicle VI approval. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, ,/ ~Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was ad~pted by unanimous vote of all the members· Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 19, 1985 Patricia Sujeski 1000 Stillwater Avenue Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Set-off for Ann Saba located at Cutchogue Dear Mrs. Sujeski: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, March 18, 1985. RESOLVED that the $outhld Town Planning Board, following a field inspection, recommend to the Zoning Board of Appeals that the application of Ann Saba located at Cutchogue be approved since it is in conformance with the surrounding area If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN TOWN PLANNING ~OARD By Diane M. Schultze, S~retary cc; Zoning Board of Appeals Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 5, 1985 Patricia Sujeski 1000 Stillwater Avenue Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Set-off for Ann Saba Dear Mrs. Sujeski: The Planning Board reviewed the above mentioned application at the regular meeting of February 4, 1985. It was the consensus of the Board to make a field inspection of the property. It was also noted that an application has not been made to the Board of Appeals and it was recommended that this be done, since the Planning Board can not act on lots of less than two acres without a variance from the Appeals Board. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc: Board of Appeals APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR~ SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWlCKi Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN RI'lAD- ~BTATE: RI-lAD 2.~ SI~UTI-InLD. L.I., N.Y. ll~J?l TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 AGENDA MARCH 7, 1985 REGULAR MEETING 7:30 p.m. Meeting to Order. Public Hearings: 7:30 p.m. Appeal No. 3325 DOUGLAS A. COOPER. To construct pole barn/stable accessory to keeping of horses on this 2.4± acre vacant parcel. R-O-W N/S Bergen Avenue, Mattituck. 7:35 p.m. Appeal No. 3322 JOSEPH LIZEWSKI. Special Exception for establishment of private racquetball club. N/S Main Road (E/S Depot Lane), Cutchogue. B-Light Bus. Zone. ( 7:40 p.m. Appeal No. 3321 ALICE D. CURRIE. Variance to re-define and change lot lines of three parcels which contain insufficient area, depth and width. N/S Soundview Avenue, Southold. 7:45 p.m. Appeal No. 3319 - ANDREAS PALIOURAS. Reinstate and restore (second) dwelling Structure to its original condition as a one-family residence. 32570 C.R. 48, Peconic. 7:50 p.m. Appeal No. 3318 WILMA MEEHAN and MARY LEONARDI. Re-division of two lots which contain insufficient area, width and depth. Reydon Drive, Southold. 7:55 p.m. Appeal No. 3306 ROBERT AND ALDONA NORKUS. Four proposed parcels with insufficient lot width. Orchard Lane, off Cedar Beach Road, Southold. 8:05 p.m. Appeal No. 3205 JOHN C. AND FRANCES DiVELLO: (a) for approval of access over "Meday Avenue" and (b) for approval of insufficient area and depth of parcels proposed. E/S Westphalia Road, Mattituck. Page 2 - March 7, 1985 Regular Meeting Southold Town Board of Appeals I. Decisions Pending from last meeting: (a) Appeal No. 3291 - ANTHONY PAGOTO. Pool in frontyard area. Bridge Lane and Bayberry Road, Nassau Point, Cutchogue; Appeal No. 3294 - PETER J. AND MARGARET TROYANO. Approval of access requested off N/S C.R. 48, Peconic. (b) II. Deliberations/Decisions from tonight's hearings: (a) Appeal No. 3325 DOUGLAS A. COOPER; (b) Appeal No. 3322 JOSEPH J. LIZEWSKI; (c) Appeal No. 3321 - ALICE D. CURRIE: (d) Appeal No. 3319 - ANDREAS PALIOURAS; (e) Appeal No. 3318 - MEEHAN AND LEONARDI: (f) Appeal No. 3306 - ROBERT AND ALDONA NORKUS; (g) Appeal No. 3205 - JOHN AND FRANCES DiVELLO. III. Resolution Authorizing Secretary to Advertise the Matters for Public Hearings to be held THURSDAY, MARCH ]~ (a) Appeal No. 3326 WILLIAM AND HELEN COSTER be submitted by advertising deadline); (b) Appeal No. 3327 EMILIA T. PIKE; __~ (c) DOMINICK VARANO (PB comments Appeal No. 3330 (d) Appeal No. 3328 - BRIDEN MACHINE CORP. (e) Appeal No. 3329 - BRIDEN MACHINE CORP. ~ (f) Appeal No. 3323 COLGATE DESIGN CORP. (g) Appeal No. 3320 BAYVIEW DEVELOPMENT PB sketch plan approval, etc. following 28, 1985: (PB comments to by 3/19 (Spec. Exc.); (Variance); (PB by 3/19); CORP./SAGE Received IV. Reviews and field inspections for the following (next available hearing date for these matters: THURS. APRIL llth): (a) Appeal No. 3331 SAUL MILLMAN (Variance); (b) Appeal No. 3332 SAUL MILLMAN (Special Exception); (c) Appeal No. 3333 HELEN D. KAPP; Page 3 March 7, 1985 Regular Meeting Southold Town Board of Appeals IV. (continued from page 2)Review and field inspections for the following matters (next available hearing date for these matters: THURS., APRIL ll~h); (c) Appeal No. 3334 - HAROLD T~ CARR. Deck in rearyard, 2045 Marratooka Road, ~attituck; (d) Appeal No. 3335 - THOMAS HIGGINS. frontyard, Ruch Lane, Southold. Accessory garage in (e) Appeal No. 33.3? KIMON AND WOODENE RETZOS. 280-a off (f) ~1P~.n~, East Marion. (Requires road report) LYNN SCIORA. Addition for deli. Reviews, Subdivision Projects awaiting application to and/o~ /~view by Planning Board prior to scheduling for hearings (~nt. I(a) Appeal No. 33361- ANN SABA/HENRY KISLOW. Insufficient \~, a~ea and width for~parcel at ~ ]~. Stillwater Avenue, Cutchogue. / '(b"~--~ppe~l No. 3338 - HOWARD L. YOUNG & WIFE. Insuffici~nt~ area of lots in prop-~~ ~-{-~n Road, Orient.~ 4/25) (c) Appeal No. JEAN C. HOLLAND. Variance with three proposals fo~ re-division of land at Vanston Road, Cutchogue. (Await filing fee and sq. ftg. of lots as drawn before Planning Board and ZBA further reviews.) (d) Appeal No. ~,,] VI. Resolutions: (a) Scheduling date to reconvene public hearings in the Matters of the Property of GUSTAV WADE: Thurs., March 21, 1985(?). (b) Environmental Declarations - Matters to be heard 3/28: [1] William and Helen Coster; [2] Emilia T. Pike; [3] Dominick Varano; [4] Briden Machine Corp.; [5] Briden Machine Corp. (special exc.); (c) [6] Colgate Design Corp. Approving the February 14, 1985 Regular Meeting Minutes. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE {516) 765-1509 TO: Office of the Planning Board (Attn: Diane) FROM: Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals (Attn: Linda) DATE: March 18, 1985 SUBJECT: Applications Pending with Z.B.A. and Planning Board To bring you up-to-date and to request your comments or recommenda- tions, the following matters have been filed since our last memorandum to you dated February 8, 1985, and will require action by the Planning Board: Matter of Tentative ZBA Heari~ Dominick Varano, by R. Lark April llth as req. Briden Machine March 28th William and Helen Coster by R. Lark April llth as req. Joseph Lizewski April llth a lgate Design (7-11, Cutch.) W. Esseks May 2 ba/Kislow/Sujeski May 2 Howard L. Young & Wf. May 2 Sobering by P. Cardinale, Esq. May 2 or 23 Vitale May 23 P. Reinhart, R. Bruer, Esq. May 23 H. Conway, R. Bruer, Esq. May 23 or June 13 Perricone & Cimini, R. Bruer, Esq. June 13 Pindar Winery June 13 or 20 Peconic Vineyards June 13 or 20 Cliffside Assoc./Tetaldi/Tide Mark June 13 or 20 1985 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies [or (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be .............. r...~..~. ................................ 3. The entire land under app!ication is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk Count)' Clerk's office as follo~vs: Llber ....q3~../L...... Page...L0~' ............. On .Z ./t~0... Liber Page On · Liber Page On ' Liber Page On ' Liber Page On · as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ....................................... or as dlstributee .................. ~. ~h~ area of the land is. Z,:~.-~.-~ .... acre,. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the (late hereof have been paid except ............ 7. The land is encumbered by .............................................................. mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page .................. in original amount of $ .............. unpaid amount $ ..................... hehl by ...................... .............. address ................................................................. (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page ....................... in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... .............. address ............................................................... (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... ...................... address ......................................................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except .............. . .......... 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- 11. 12. cept ................................................................................... The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. The land (does) (~0e~-~ lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trier, if within a District, is .............................................................. 13. Water mains will be laid by ............................................................ 14. and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. /~ .-. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . .:~(~/.~t~/~.J ................. . ..: ...... ( ) ( ) ill b d f installing said .......................... and a no chargexv emae or lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by .../~..)~7..,U... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shoxvn on the plat are claimed by the appli,c, an,,t to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex' Sdfiedule B hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town o! So~J. thold I-Iighwa2t system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. ~.nere are no existing oullclln~s or structures on the land which are not located and shoxvn on the plat. 19. gVhere the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoiuing sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjuuctions with tile proposed streets. In the course o[ these proceedings, the apl~lic:tnt will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 20. 21. -etlbmit a cop3' of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, 'etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $ .......... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity o{ the Performance Bond be fixed at '. ............. years. The Performance Boud will be xvritten by ,,IV,, a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule · '" (Name o~ · pp ican ) ......... (Si~ature and Title) STATE OF NEx, V YORK, COUNTY Ol:~'-~Z~.~- ./'~ -I ~· ................. ss: · . ~b'L 4£.~. ~--~.4L, .~fS. 4. to me known to be the individual described in and xvho executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that .~.~ ~... executed tlm same. Notar~Public ~ - STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ............................ ss: On the ................ day ............ of ............... 19 ....... before me personally came ................... ' t6"hm knmvn, ~vho being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No ..................................................... ................................. that .......................... is the .......... the corporation descrlhed in and xvhich executed the foregoing instrument; that ............ knows the seal of said corporatlou; that the seal affixed hy order of the board of directors of said corporation. and that ............ signed .............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public ~ OF S OUTHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS-~iE~T - PART PROJECT IBTF OR/4AT ION . .. sa indict, ce and sae':-i~y a--.cn instance. -~..::, -/ - ~,~a, / ~ · (Physiel setting of a~er~ll l~jec:, bath develoc~ snd ~develcoed areas) ' '' ........ '" ' l, Gefler~l Cqaract~r of the land: Gener~ill~ unifom sloae ~ener~lly ~even and ~iling or.irregular Pr~.sent !end use: , Indus:rial , Co.ere!a! , Suouroan ' , Aura] , Fores: . , Agriculture ,, Q~qer · '-. 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: O-lO~: C; lO-15~ ~; 15~ or greater 7. Is project contiguous to., or contain a building or site listed on the ~(ational Register of Historic Places? Yes ~-~ No 8. What is the depth to the water table? feet 9. ~ hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? . Yes '' 10. Ooes p~?ect site contain any~species o? plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endanc..ed - Yes --~o, according to - Identify each species 11. lZ. 13. 14.. Are there any unique or unus~Ual land forms on the project site) (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological refutations - Yes ~No. (Describe Is the Project site ~r~sentIy used by the c~unit7 or netghborhoo~ as an open space or'recreation . area - Yes ~ 'No. ' .- . ~oes the present~ite offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to .the co~auntty? Yes ~ ~o - Stream,s within or contiguous to project area: a. Na~e of stream and name of river to which it is tributary 15. Lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: ./~Y: , . a. Na~ I b. Size (in acres} · 15. What is the dominant lanJ use and zoning classificet!on within a I/4 mile radius of idle project .(e.g. single family residential, R-~) and the scale of development {e.g. ~ story}./ B. PROJE~ OESCRIPTIQH I. Physical dimensions and s~le of p~ject {fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage o~ed by~p~ject sponsor :~ ' acres ...... ~..:. . ~, ,' b. P~oect acreage daveloped~ ' ~acres~t~ally; acr~ ultsmately. ~,.~ ~jec~ ~cr~ge ~ ~in undevelaped Length of project, tn mites: ~if appmpriate) If p~ject ts an ~pansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: build~ng'squa~ foo~ $ developed acreage f. )lumber of off-st~t parking spaces existing ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour .{upon completion of prOject) h. If residential: N~ber and type o? housing units: · - One 'Fa~nily Two Family Initial Ultimate Multiple Family Condominium IF: Co.~r~ereial Orient~tlon Neighbornood-City-Regiona) Estimated Employment Industrial J. Fatal height of t~llest proposed structure much na:urel ma:ariel (i.e. rock, ear:h, etc.) will be re,ovid fro~ the site - ~ tons ~ cubic yards How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs, g~oun~ covers) will be removed from site - (~ acres. 4. ~ill any mature forest {o~e~r 1OO years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes S. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that re~oved during construction? ~es If single phase project: If multi-phasQd project: · 8. Will blasting occur during constriction? 9. ~t~ber of jobs generated: during construction 10. Nu~er of jobs eliminated by this project ll. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? 1:3. 14. 15. '16. 17. 18. lg. Yes .: after project is complete Yes Anticipated period of construction months. (including demolition). a. Total n~nber of phases anticipated ' No. '' . ' b. Anticipated date of co~ence~ent phase 1 month year {including demolition) Approximate completion date final phase .~nth year. .. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent phases? Yes No yes, explain: a. [s surface or subsur(ace liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes No. b. If yes. indicate type of waste (se~age, industrial, etc.) c. If surface disposal name of strea~ into ~hich effluent will be discharged Will surface are~ of existing la,es, pon~ds, stre~s, bays or other surfacewate~ays be increased or decreased by proposal? ~es ,_,.---~o. .. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? a. Opes project involve disposal of solid waste? ~es No b. If yes, will an mxisting solid waste disposal facility be used? _Yes c. If yes, give no=e: _ ; location d. ~lill any wastes eot go into a sewage disposal system or i~to a sanitary landfill? ~ Yes Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes ~ ~ . Will project r~utinely produce odors'(morethan one hour per day)?.__._Yes L~o~ . Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes ~o Will project result in an increase in energy use? .____Yes i,~..No. If yes, indicate type(s) __ Yes 20. Z1. If water supply is fr~m wells indicate pu~.ping c~-pacity Total anticipated water usage ~er day ~als/day. Zoning: gals/minute. a. ~hat is dominant'zoning classific~ticn of site? b. Current s;ecific zoning classificaCion of site C. Is proposed use Consistent with present zoning? d. If no, indicate desired toning 26. Appr~va)s: a. Is any Federal pe~it required? Yes ,~ No b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? ¢. Lo~al and Regional approvals: _ Yes ,,,j ' No Approval Recuired (Yes, No) (Type} Su~miCtal Approva) (Date) (Date) City, ~, Village 8oa~ City, ~wn, Village Planning Soard City, ~wn, ~ning Board City, County Health Department Other local agencies Other regions) agencies State Agencies ~deral Agencies I~(F0 P~AT I G~IAL DETAILS Attach any additional infor~ttion as may be needed to clarify your project. If thJre are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures whicm can be taken to mitigate or avoid them. . TIT~: ................ / REP~ESE~TI~G: DATE: / -- ~'~ · ,~ ~ , RODERICK VAN TUYL {L.S.) COLIN VAN TUYL RrlDERIOK VAN TUYL, Licensed Land Surveyors FRONT STREET AT MAIN GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 (516) 477~170 OTTO W. VAN TUYL Professional Engineer (Retired) ,JAN ? ]985 Dec. 26, 1984 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed "set-off"; property of Ann Saba Gentlemen: In behalf of Ann Saba of Stillwater Avenue, Outchogue, we are requesting that the proposed ~vision of her property be considered as a "set-off". The maps accompanying her application indicate a division of approximately equal areas of the two parcels, one of which contains an existing residence and the other being a vacant parcel of land. We believe that the map contains the required infor- mation necessary for the Board to take appropriate action. Thank you for your early attention to this matter; reply should be made to Pat Sujeski, daughter of Mrs. Saba, who resides at 1000 Stillwater Ave., Cutchogue. Yours truly, Roderick Van Tuyl, PO FORM NO~ 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Date . .I,.).-q .................... ,19 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated . ./'-~?...o~.~.....~...../..Z~. ...... 19 .?ti for permit to ~ ~-"¢3.~ ~- . ~ ................ at ~cation of Property ...~ ~ ...... ~..~.' .... ~~.~-':' nou~ mo. ~'t~et p// .amtet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ...~ .~. ~ ..... Block .... ~ ~t ~ . ~ ...... Subdivision ................. Filed Map No ................. Lot No .................. is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds .............. .~. ...... /.~.~ .? ~....~..~. :~~....~..~...~..mm.../~~ .~..5..~-.. -~.~ ~.~& .,.. ¢., ~./.~. ~ .~. ~ ~. ~ ~..~.. ~ ~2 ~ ~o .. . .......... ~ ..... ~ ........... ff ' · .ff~ .............................. Building Inspector RV 1/80