Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-102.-2-11
\ \ \ ,/ P, D Southold. N.Y. 11971 (616) 765-1938 June 25, 1985 Dr. Joseph J. Lizewskt Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Site Plan for Racquet ball Courts Dear Dr. Lizewski: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, June 24, 1985. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site plan of Dr. Joseph J. Lizewski and supplemental landscape~ plan for the construction of a racquet ball facility at Depot Lane and Main Road, Cutchogue, plan dated April 6, 1984; subject to removal of access from the Main Road. Would you please submit three surveys indicating the removal of the access from the Main Road for the Chairman to endorse. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our offic~ Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc: Building Department Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 ,D APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Application~-~g/~_~/-- Filing Fee Date Rec'd New Use Change of Use Re-Use Extension of Existing Use Revislon of an Approved Site Plan (Date of Approval Other .Specify Name of Business or Site Location of Site ~£n~ f Address of Site, if ~va~labie'~/F//~k~ ~Q~n,~nA~ {~o~/~n~,,~¢ Name o~ Applicant ~A _~ ~'~,~,' ' - / ' Address of Applicant ~f ~_ - Telep~one Telephone' 7;~ Applicant's interest in site-check one: ~ner of Land Under contract-to purchase___ Owner of Fee Title to Land ~.~ ~. Address ~ ~ ' .Teleph°ne Site Plans Pr%pared by~gk,, ~<~.~ License No. Address ~ ~q~ ~ Telephone Total Land Area of Site ~ o~,.~' Sq. Ft. Zone District Existing Use of Site~{~/~ ~-C~,¢~.__ Proposed Use of Site Gross Floor Area of ~xi~ting Structure(s)~qft. Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) ~0 ~Je~qft. ~ Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) Datum(Specify)U.S.G.S. Other .sqft. --- sqft. % Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals Case Number ' Name of Applicant Date of Decision ~xpiration Dat~ Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued No ACT 0 =CAVAT ON CO ST UC ON APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~O~ ~ ~/~;~'/' being duly sworn, deposes and says that h~ resides at ~j~,~ L4~% in the State of New York, and that'he is the.owner of the above property, or that he is the of the (Title) (Specify whether Partnership which is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. Sworn to before me this F~$. day of (Notary Public), Commi~.~inn Fxnire~ Jun'. ?0, 19/-/ (Owner) (Partner or Title) -- , as zesid~u~y lega. t~e ~rde= ~he t~ill o! Y, athezine Bialecki, --Bm (2) { ~' 2~' )0" ~ 207.40 f~t ~ ~ ~tOrp~ the ,h7 of ' JI OEPOT £RIERPRISE$, INC., a domestic ccrporatton with offices at no f, Depot Lane, Cu.tcho6Ua, New York, SOUt. hwASt corner of the pr~miae~ her,fin describ~ ad~ointr~; bizf~skl on the west, said !~int beit~ 114.71 feet measure) alor~ the northerly linn of Main Road from* its intern~tion with the e~tmrly line of Depot Lanes from said o! t)~innin~ runnin~ thence alon~ the northerly line o[ North 31 de~lr~es 20 minutes 10 5~co~)s East 150 feet to ll~ o(F~erty) cunni~ thence ~Iow) said 1~ south 43 mi~utN lO I~S ~t 221,10 (ee~ to the ~stecly line bmne) runni~ thence alo~ said line ~uth 39 d~cees 39 s~s East 173,13 fee~. to 1~ ot lbiz~skl) cunni~ s~id 1~ t~ ~urse ~ distanc~ as ~oll~st (1) North d~ce~ 20 mtflut~ 10 s~rds ~ast 41,70 feet, theKe ~reen 26 ~inute8 ~0 I~. E~st 207.40 ~e~ to the plmce of b~lnnl~. ~ C~'~ , . October Judte Ann Lize~ski 14-16-4 (2'r&7)-Te×t 12 PROJECTI.D NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) SEQR 2. PROJECT NAME 1. APPLICANT )SPONSOR Village Commons Village Commons 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Southold County Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, otc, or provide map) 320 Depot Lane, Cutchogue, New York 11935 5, IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion [] Modificationtalteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: adding ;[$00 square feet to south side of building for additional space to operate the health club located thereat. 7. AMOUNT CF LAND AFFECTED: Initially. two(20 acres URIma[ely twu(2) ~crcs 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? [] Yes [] NO I! NO. describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial [] Agriculture [] Park/Fo~est/O0en space [] Other Describe: property is located east of an automobile service station, a convenience store and other retail establishments, and perpendicular to a hardware store. 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? [~No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals Health Department 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTIOH HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] No If yes, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [] Yes [] No I CERTIFY THAT THE ~NFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ApplicanUsponsor name: Siqnature: Joseph_ Lizewski x %.0 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this ass OVER 1 Date: April 18, 19! NING BOARD PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (TO be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 It yes. coordinate the ~l~l~procllll~u ~,~ the FULL E~F. B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNMatED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PA~3'~1~.67 Jf NQ~& negative deularatlon may be superseded by another Involved agency. [] Yes [] NO C. COULD ACTION RESULT iN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, it legible) Cl. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential tot ,erosion, drainage or f[oociing problems? Explain bra y Aesthetic, agricultural, Archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of [and or other n. aturai resources? Explain briefly, C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl.C57 Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (Including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D, ~S THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No If Yes, explain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION.OF SIGNIF_!CANCE (To be completed hy Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For e~ch adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should he assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) [rreversibiJity; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ~ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed act[on WILL NOT result in any. significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the'r~asons supporting this determination: Date 2 Title ot Responsrble Otficer Sisnature ot Preparer (it different from responsible officer} ~.11 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only SEQR PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION ('rD be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR ' 2. PROJECT NAME 3. PROJECT LOC.~TI(~N' - 4. PRECISE LOCATION (StrUt address end road'inte~ec~ons, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: New ~ Expansion [] M odiflcat ionlalt erst Ion 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately acres COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? 8. WlLLIILL/PROPOSED ACTION ~'Yes [] No If No, describe briefly WHA IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ~Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial [] Agriculture [] PaddForesUOpen space [] Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNO~NG, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? [] Yea ~'No If yes, list agency(a) and permit/approvals 11. [~y~S ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? s [] NO If yes, list agency name and permit/al~proval OF~'~OPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? 12. AS A RESULT ~-~-n~ [] Yes I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Appllcant/sponao[slgnature, ~)'~<.}~--'~'IL' name: , _Ti~.-~/~_~..~,.T. ~/'"7~ ~./'.O,~' ,/~', ' Date: I If the action Is In the Area, you agency, Coastal and are S state complete tho Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES -:NT (To be completed by Agency) .... A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD N 6 NYCRR, PART 617~127 If yes, coordinate the review procesg and use the FULL EAF. [] Yes [] No 3. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNUSTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. [] Ye, [] NO C. COULD ACTION RESULT rN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be hanciwrttten, if legible} C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quaUty or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildrife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? ExDlaJn briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl-C57 Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No If Yes, explain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or other:wise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) Irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessa~/, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occu~ Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ~:] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed actron WILL NOT result in any. significant adverse environmental Impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the~asons supporting this determination: Name of Lead ^sency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Date Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If differea_t ,from respo~aible officer) 2 COherence (within 30 days of written request) Complete application received (Within 4 months of presub, conference) ApPlication reviewed at work'session (Within 10 days of receipt) Applicant a.d, vised of necessary revisions (W/thin 30 days of review)' . SITE PLAN Revised submission received Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination REFERRED TO: Zoning Board of Appeals (written c.omments Within 60 days of request) BOard of Trustees Building Department (certification) ' Suffolk County Department of Planning · Department of Transportation -State Department of Transportation _~..~y Suffolk County Dept. of Health Fire Commissioners RECEIVED: Sent:_!o ~z q~ Received:_~- x~-~3 - Draft Covenants and Restrictions Fi/ed Covenants and Restrictions Landscape p/an Lighting plan Curb Cut approval Health approval Drainage p/an Reviewed by Engineer Approval of site pian -with conditions Endorsement of site 'Plan Certificate of Occupancy inspection tine year review PLANNING BOARD MEMBJ RICHARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR, WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 10, 1996 Charles R. Cuddy Attorney at Law 180 Old Country Road (Rte. 58) P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane, Cutchogue Zoning District: Residential Office (RO) SCTM# 1000-2-12.1 & 11 Dear Mr. Cuddy, The Board has received your letter of June 8, 1996, requesting guidance on the above project. As contained in the Board's letter of July 11, 1995, (copy enclosed), the s. ite plan must show all changes ~o the site since July 19, 1985, the date of the previously approved plan. Basically the plan must show the new parking arrangement , the removal of certain buildings, (barn and sheds), and the removal of the proposed addition on the north east side of the existing building in addition to the second story addition. The plan should also reflect any additional changes since the July 19, 1985, approved plan. In addition, a review by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is required. If you have any questions, or require assistance, please contact this office. cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS C~icnard G. Word, Choirmon George Ritc,me Latham, Jr. 9ennett OdowsKi, Jr. Marx S. McOonald Kenne[h L. =~wards Town Hail, 53095 Main ~oad P. O. ~3ox 1179 $outhold, New Yorx ! 197! Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (,516 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ,July 11, 995 Charles R Cuddv Attorney at Law 180 Old Country P.O. Sox 15~7 Riverhead, NY I RE: Proposed s Joseph tizewskl Oepot Lane Zonlng Oistrict: Residential OFFice (RO) SCTM#1000-102-2-I2.1 $ 11 Road (Rte. 58) 901 te pi'an For Or. Cutchogue Dear Mr . Cuddy: rF you plan to withdraw the above appl~cat[on, as you have Fnd~cated in your letter of July 8, 1995, the site must be modified to conform ~o the plan approved on July 19, 1985. Th would require the removal of certain improvements that were installed since that ~[me. It Fs to your clients advantage to amend the existing plan that ~s before this 8pard as he has already paid the Fee. IF the plan ~s w~thdrawn and an amended plan is subsequently Filed to bring the site in conformance with present conditions a new applicatlon and Fee w~ll be required. Approval is required From the SuFfolk County Department oF Health Services For t~e existlng use of the Health Club before any posslble Final s~t~' plan approve can be granted. I ~ you have any questions, PJr~...'~kse c~'~n~ac~ ~hi$ office. ~t cn~rd -~ .' t~ard Cha ~ rman cc: Gerard P. Goehr[nger, Chairman, Zoning Thomas Fisher, Senior 8uildlng Inspector I_aury Dowd, Town Attorney Edward Forrester, Town Investigator Town Board information, 8oard oF Appeals In Charge ATTOltl~lg¥ AT LAW June 18, 1996 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Dr. Joseph Lizewski Dear Board Members: Joseph Lizewski has asked me to respond to your letter of June 3rd. He has, after considerable reflection, decided to use his building as a one story structure and maintain the second floor for storage and not in Connection with any office or health club use. With this in mind would you please advise what you believe is necessary to comply with your site plan requirements. CRc/pc Very truly yours, Charles R. ;uddy~ VY, L~.RIE $COPAZ TOWN' PLANNER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 OFFICE OF THE TOWN PLANNER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 3, 1996 Charles R. Cuddy Attorney at Law 180 Old Country Road (Rte. 58) P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Mr. Cuddy, The Board has not had a response to the letter sent to you on July 11, 1995, concerning the application of your client Dr. Joseph Lizewski. A copy of the Board's letter of July 11, 1995, is enclosed for your use. If you have any questions, or require assistance, please contact this office. )~ob~rf G .~ Kassner Site Plan Reviewer cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Oflowski, Jr. Mark S. McOonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall1 53095 Main Road P.O. Box1179 Southold, New YOrK 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 11, 1995 Charles R. Cuddy Attorney at Law 180 Old Country Road P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 (Rte. 58) RE: Proposed s~te plan For Dr. Joseph Lizewskl Depot Lane, Cutchogue Zoning Oistrict: Resldential OFfice (RO) SCTM#1OOO-102-2-12.1 & 11 Dear Mr. CiJddy: IF you plan to withdraw the above application, as you have indicated in your letter of July 8, 1995, the site must be modified to conform to the plan approved on July 19, 1985. This would require the removal of certain improvements that were nstalled since that time. t is to your clients advantage to amend the existing plan that s before this 8oard as he has already paid the fee. If the plan s withdrawn and an amended plan is subsequently Filed to bring the site in conformance with present conditions a new application and fee will be required. Approval is required From the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for t~.existing use of the Health Club before any posslbie Final slt~' plan approval can be granted. IF you have any quest:ions, ple~Ckse c~tact this oFFice. Cha i rman or require Further CC: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector Laury Dowd, Town Attorney Edward Forrester, Town Investigator Town Board information, Board of Appeals In Charge PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman , George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Ortowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P, O, Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 11, 1995 Charles R. Cuddy Attorney at Law 180 Old Country Road (Rte. P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 58) RE: Proposed site plan for Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane, Cutchogue Zoning District: Residential Office (RO) SCTM#1OOO-102-2-12.1 & 11 Dear Mr. Cuddy: If you plan to withdraw the above application, as you have indicated in your letter of duly 8, 1995, the site must be modified to conform to the plan approved on July 19, 1985. This would require the removal of certain improvements that were installed since that time. It is to your clients advantage to amend the existing plan that is before this Board as he has already paid the fee. If the plan is withdrawn and an amended plan is subsequently filed to bring the site in conformance with present conditions a new application and fee will be required. Approval is required from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for the existing use of the Health Club before any possible final site plan approval can be granted. If you have any questions, Cha i rman or require further information, Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector In Charge Laury Dowd, Town Attorney Edward Forrester, Town Investigator Town Board enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Lalham, Jr. 8ennell Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Soulhold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 June 19, 1995 Dr'. Joseph L;zewski Depot Lane Cutchoguel NY 11935 RE: Proposed site plan For Dr. Joseph Depot Lane, Cutchogue Zoning D~strict: Residential Off SCTM#1000-102-2-12.1 S 11 Lizewski ce (RO) Dear Dr. Lizewski: Please indicate to this Board in writ ng your intentions with regard to your site plan application. IF you plan to withdraw the application, the site must conform to the plan approved on July 19, 1985. IF you wish to retain the existing conditions at the site, an amended site plan must be filed, reflecting the changes that have occurred since the plan was approved on July 19,1985. 1. Volley ball court and elevator structure must be shown, 2. Show all uses permitted by the Zoning Board of Appeals. 3. Show existing storage building.s on the site. 4. Show change in parking. 5. Place New York State license seal and signature of licensed surveyor or civil errglneer on the plan. In addition to the above, we were informed by Mr. Craig Knepper of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services that you have never applied For, or received, Health Department approval For the Health Club use. Please have the amended site plan ~tamoed and approved by the Health Department. IF you have any question, contact/~his office. Chairman or reqUire further information, please CC: Gerard P. Goehr-inger, Chairman, Zoning Board oF Appeals Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector In Charge Laury Dowd, Town Attorney Edward Forrester, Town Investigator Town Board OitAa~s R. GIYDDY 180 OLD Co~a~w~Y ROAD (Rwy. ,58) July 8, 1995 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971-1179 Re: Depot Enterprises - Proposed Site Plan (Addition) Gentlemen: I am the attorney for Dr. Joseph L. Lizewski and respond to your letter of June 19, 1995. This is to ask you ~o mark your records that the site plan application before you 15 withdrawn. The site will be made to conform to the Town's requirements. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy JUL I 0 1995 SOUTHOLO TOWN PLANNING BOARD PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 19, 1995 Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed site plan for Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane, Cutchogue Zoning District: Residential Office (RO) SCTM#1OOO-102-2-12.1 & 11 Dear Dr. Lizewski: Please indicate to this Board in writing your intentions with regard to YOUr site plan application. If you plan to withdraw the application, the site must conform to the plan approved on July 19, 1985. If you wish to retain 'the existing conditions at the site, an amended site plan must be filed, reflecting the changes that have occurred since the plan was approved on July 19,1985. 1. Volley ball court and elevator structure must be shown. 2. Show all uses permitted by the Zoning Board of Appeals. 3. Show existing storage buildings on the site. 4. Show change in parking. 5. Place New York State license seal and signature of licensed surveyor or civil engineer on the plan. In addition to the above, we were informed by Mr. Craig Knepper of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services that you have never applied for, or received, Health Department approval for the Health Club use. Please have the amended site plan stamped and approved by the Health Department. If you have any question, contact/?this office. ~"Richard ~. Ward Cha i rman or require further information, please CC,' Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector In Charge Laury Dowd, Town Attorney Edward Forrester, Town Investigator Town Board NO. 516-852-2092 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PAGES: TRANSMITTAL FORM (~neludtng this page) If this is no~ ~eceived in 1ts entirety, please call 516-852-~.~. ! ~. WWM-006 (Rev. 1/93) Notice No. '/ .S_~FFOLK COUNTY D~A~T~NT OF ~LTH SERVICZS TO: FROM: Suffolk County Center Riverhead/ New york 11901' .NQTICE OF INCOI~PLETE A~PLZCATION , CO~I~ ' · ,., - .... ~ , ,~ ~ ~, - T.M. Designation /OD0 '[(P~-~ ill l~. I Article VI a VII Zon~ ~ = ======================= .=..=.=..= -=er======= ...... ~U== .... =~=======~= .... Town and/or Village Zonin~ Letter [ ] Completed Appli~ation ~ 004~[ ] Answer 11 Questions -See wF [ ] Public Water/Sawer Availability Letter NYSDRC Wetlands Permit or Waiver Restrictive Covenants~: Article 7 Other Processing Fee $ Review Board Determination szu~ Oeter~i~io~ Page 4 of Application WWM-004 %-~ SPDES Application Form [ ] SPDES Site Plan 8 1/2" x 11" [ ] SPD~S.~,ee $~o.o0 $7s.oo LNFOP~ATZON MZSSZN¢ aaD/OR Com~CTi6NS Tax Map Designation ~,~,,~-~,, A~ I,:- ~]Plans Not Metes and Bounds Description [ ] Lot Size ~c,~ hx&~ [ ] Key ~p [~ Sewage System ~lan/P=ofile Distance ~0 C=~SS Street [~ Gallons/Day/Acre"~e~age Discharge Tes~ Hole Information ~ eO$fi~:'.,. [~ Sewage Disposal ~esign'Calculation~ ~?: Floor Plans ~,m r~ ~ ~,/~ ~ ~ Ail Surface ~aters Wxthxn 300 ~t. [ ] Site Statistt~'S""~S~ Private Well Details and Location ~ Sewage System Inve~ EleVations:~ Neighboring Wells and Sewage [ ] Systems Within 1~0' of Property [ ] Project does no~ conform ~o Depar~men~ standards. See enclOSed Notice of Non-Conformance Comment: [ ] Plan re~iew xs being coordinated with the following. granted without their review and permit is: 6 (Subdivision) [ ]Art. CC: - ' ,,~ ..,,g/,, . t-Oi4 No. [ ] ~ exist~g s~oils on t~ site con~zn ~ ~t, ~, silts, cla~. or ~ious ~Kerials ~ch e~e~ ~1~ the ~n~r ~le or e~sting s~oils [ ] ~ ~ter or ~ai~ co~itlo~ ~ ~ult~le for t~ p~r f~tzon~g ( ) A den~triftcatlon s~t~ is p~. ' 5. [ ] ~J~t is a~ntly on 1~ to ~ s~ivid~{ ?r 1~ s~i~ided s~nt to For ~i~ration, p~f s~ld ~ s~itt~ that ~is ~J~t co~o~ with t~se ~l~nts of t~ Suffolk C~ty Sanita~ C~: If this ~tter c~t ~ ~sol~, ~st a v~ta~e f~t t~e skis ~ a~lyz~ to the ~U~ent's .~d of ~i~ (fo~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Man~ S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P, O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Town Board · Richard G, Ward. Chairm SUBJECT: Chang,e of Zone Application for Depot Enterprises Route 25. Cutchogue SCTM~f 1000-102-2-12,1 DATE: May 23, 1995 A request from the Town Board for Comments on the above applicant's request for a zone change caused this Board to review the status of the applicant's pending application for site plan approval. This review reveals the following: The site plan application has been pending before this Board for two years, The applicant has not been able to obtain Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval for his Health Club due to its not being in conformance with health standards by being over density, {See attached report) The applicant has no Certificate of Occupancy for the building, (Temporary Certifica[e of Occupancy. (attached). expired in 1987, The expired temporary C,O, indicates that the second floor is non-habitable. The applicant has been, and is, before the New York State Board of Review to determine if the health club structure is in compliance with the Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code. As we understand it, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services has not issued approval for occupancy of the existing building used as a health club. Attached is a copy of the County Health Department~ Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Other Than Single Family Residences~ pages I~ and 5. Changing the zone of this property will not resolve these outstanding issues with the State and the County. cc: Laury Dowd, Town Attorney Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector JUDrrH T. TERRY TO~I CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MAY 2, 1995: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby accepts the amendment to the change of zone petition of Depot Enterprises, Inc. from "R-O" Residential Office District to "HB" Hamlet Business, and the inclusion the adjacent parcel to the west, also owned by the applicant, in the Petition for a change of zone. Southold Town Clerk May 3, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO FILE FROM: Robert C. Kassner. Site Plan reviewer ~ DATE: May 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Status of Application, Depot Enterprises On the work session meeting of December 12. 199~. it was brought to the attention of the Board that Dr. Lizewski would eliminate the new addition from the plan and would put the parking area back as on the approved plan. Dr. Lizewski asked if a site plan was necessary? Dr. Lizewski said he would put his specific request in writing to the Board. The Board would then compare the present plan with the approved plan and review Health status. A call was made to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services to determine the current status of Health Department approval. Mr. D~glass Feldman of the Health Department informed Mr. Kassner that the Health approval covered the Dental practice and the business office use but not the Health Club. Mr. Kassner told Mr. Feldman that the Planning Board wished to expedite the review of this plan a'~ Dr. Liezwski's request, Mr, Feldman told Mr, Kassner that he would refer this matter to his supervisor Mr. Costa for review and resolution, To date Dr. Lizewski has not responded in writing to the Planning Board with his request and the Board has not heard from Mr. Costa at the Health Department. Mr. Kassner will follow up with both Dr. Lizewski and the Health Department. Southold Town Planning 16 Dece~mber 12, 1994 Mr.'"We~d: The last item on the agenda tonight is the resolution to sere~i~a Chairman for the Pta~ng Board for the 1995 period. Mr. 0rl?wsk_i: ~t the Southold Town Plan~r~'~l~ar~d recommend to the Town Board that Richard G. Wa~'d~the Plannin~g~ B~3ar~ Chairman for 1995. Mr. Edwards: Second the motionS. Mr. Ward: Motion seco~d~. AIl in favor?'~'~ Ayes: Mr. McDo~, Mr. Oriowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edward~ Ward. Mr. W .~.~pposed? Motion carried. Mr. Ward: Is there anyone here that would like to address the Board? Ken Abruzzo: Good evening. I just have a quick question because I didn't hear, I got distracted in the back when you were reading the determination for Rockcove. Mr. McDonald: Negative Declaration. Mr. Abruzzo: Thank you. I thought so, but somebody was talking. Dr. Lizewski: ~ At this time I've decided to forgo continuing with my site plan with the building that I've applied for and I would like to know should I go back to the original site plan and put the six car parking lot in that I have there, that was passed, or...what do I have to do with the new parking lot? Mr. Ward: With what? Dr. Lizewski: Well, I put in a parking lot for 22 cars. On the original site plan that was approved, I have a site plan for 6 cars. So, since I'm not continuing to build this building that I originally started, I want to know do you want me to put back the 6 car parking lot? Mr. Ward: Well, if you're filing for a site plan at this point... Dr. Lizewski: I'm not filing for a site plan any longer. I'm not going to build anything. Mr. Ward: OK, so you go back to what you had originally, Dr. Lizewski: So you want me to put the six car parking lot in there? Mr. Ward: Does that calculate out Joe as to what you're doing there? Dr. Lizewski: It was approved on the original plan and what I'm worried about is that it was approved on the original site plan, so if that what it was... Mr. Ward: Is there anything on that site plan that's there now that wasn't on an original site plan? Southold Town Planning 17 Dr. Lizewski: Just an elevator shaft, which (inaudible) Mr. Kassner: Is the second story addition not going to proceed also? Dr. Lizewski: No, we're not going to proceed with any of that. Mr. Ward: Can you come in and review it with Bob and look at it? Dr. Lizewski: I just want to know if you want the six car parking lot put back, so it comes out to the odginal site plan that was approved, for my CO's. Mr. McDonald: Come back and take a look at it with Bob to see what the impact is. We've got to look at the two maps to see...there's probably no impact though. Dr. Lizewski: There's no impact certainly from an elevator shaft. Mr. Ward: Review it with Robert and we'll take a look at it. Dr. Lizewski: To me, if I have to go through all sorts of hoops to get the 22 car parking spots approved, i'd rather just go back and give you the six car parking lot that was originally approved. Mr. Orlowski: Don't you need it for the volleyball court? Dr. Lizewski: No, you don't need it for the volleyball court. Mr. Ward: Well, review it with Bob as a first shot and let's take a look at it. Mr. McDonald: Send us a letter saying that ... Dr. Lizewski & Mr. McDonald talking simultaneously. Mr. McDonald: Then you're not rescinding your application for the change. Dr. Lizewski: I'm not going any further with it. It's out of the question at this point. Mr. McDonald: Then it's active, and we have to treat it like it's active. Dr. Lizewski: Well, then I'll rescind it. ; Mr. McDonald: Send us a letter. We need something for the record if you want us to stop, and you can ask if you can get any of your money back because you're stopping. Dr. Lizewski: You give back money? (everyone talking, laughing) Alright, I'll stop and talk to Bob about it. Thank you. Mr. Ward: Anyone else this evening like to address the Board before we adjourn? If not, Happy New Year, Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah and we'll see you in January. Is there a motion to adjourn? Mr. Odowski: So moved. Mr. Latham: Second. December 12, 1994 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Richard C, Wilton BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 Appl. No. 4244SE. Application of DEPOT ENTERPRISES. INC. This is a request-for a Special Exception. as amended, to include approval for the location and use of a proposed~ addition to the existing principal, building located at 320 Depot Lane. Cutchogue., New. York. The proposed addition is an expansion of the existing recreational' membership, club and. is located in the Residentlal~Office- (RD) Zone District~ Property ID No. 1000-102-2-12.1. WHEREAS. a public hearing:was held on June 8. 1994, at which time persons who desired to be heard were heard and. their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered ali, testimony, and documentation submitted concerning; this application; and. WHEREAS. the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS. the Board made .the .following. findings of fact: 1. By this application, applicant requests a Special,, Exception for a proposed 30 ft. by 60, ft. addition for use~ as. a "weight room" for exercise, and health club, activities, related to the existing health .and recreation club. all as shown on the June,6. 199tk site plan map prepared by Anthony W,. Lewandowski. Land. Surveyor~ The setbacks of the proposed addition ~re shown to, be 92 feet from the westerly front property line .-and, 86+--feet to.the northerly p~operecy line,;.. The number of. parking spaces is shown proposed at 45. There are an . existing, buffer between the northwesterly parking area and~ Depot Laneof approximately 12-I/2 feet' in depth and. buffer area north of the, parking, area at approximately ten (10) feet-in depth. The playground ar~a is to be removed, The frontage .of-the subject properffcy along, the Main Road is 149.39 in length, and along Depot Lane,173.13 feet. 2. The premises at which the subjeet addition is .proposed as 320 Depot-Lane-(and, 29325 Main Road). Cutchogue,; NY. c< total area, of '1.63+- acres~ and is located, in the, ResidentiaI-Ofl District. The recreational building is and has been used for he Pag~ ,2 =- Appeal No,- 424~ Decision Rendered June 2~. 199Lt Matter of DEPOT ENTERPRISES, INC, business and office use, since its inception in 1985. when the property was zoned. B-Light Business. {Prior to receiving a Special. Exception,1985 the building . was used as a dwelling,and-offices.) 3. At this time. the ..main building is under, review for a final Certificate of Occupancy pertaining: to a portion, of the areas converted in 1985 from office and/or residential, to its present.' use -and- pertaining to the restricted use,, of the :second, floor. Simultaneously, pending, with this application is an,, amended site plan.revlew before the.Town Planning Board pertaining to the,new, addition, (Note: A site plan map,dated 4-6-8u. was approved previeusly, and signed, by the., Chairman of the Planning Board on 7-19-85; also a temporary Certificate of Occupancy was-issued by the Building Inspector on November 6. 1987 for the recreation center under No. Z16374. with a notation that the second.floor be non-habitable, ) 4. Additionally. {a) this Board finds that the request for an addition to the recreation cente~ by SpeciaL-.Exception is, not improperv based upon the prior Special Exception-jurisdiction~ in 1985 and Section 100-261 of the current-zoning code ,{as. confirmed by the Building Inspector in his April 21. 1994 letter}; and (b) the master plan revisions~ adopted on January 10. 1989 changed the zoning of. the ,subject premises from "B-Light Business" to "Residential-Office. (RO)." which in effect removed retail- and. other commercial uses for establishments created after Januar`y 10. 1989; {c) the legislative .body of the Town should.enact a new zone district or zone category which would, would allow~ business properties of this nature as a recreation center (this type-ef, use.was not included in the new. zone district designations, such as HB. RO. LB. B. when r`evised under the 1989 Maste~ Plan and Zoning. Code). (d) the~e has,been no substantial;.change.:in the.dimensions-of the property or size of the buildings.since immediately pr,lot, to January 1989 or, thereafter-which might effect the cir,cumstances of the revised master plan; or this application; {e) the surr,ounding area consists of the .following,: (1) to the north, residences; {2) to the west. Depot Lane and opposite Depot Lane to the west and southwest, a gasoline.statior~with aut(~ repair services and. a dwelling~ each located in. the, Hamle~ Business.. Zone District. (3) to the,north of the'Hamlet-Buslness,Zone:Distrlct is the Cutchogue~West School which is improved with the. school's main~.build[ng~ outside playgrounds and,outside recreationa~ areas; (4) to the south is the Main State Highway and property zoned. R-40 Low-Density Residential Zone ,District. ' Page.3 ' Appeal No~ ~2~11 Decision Rendered June.L~, 199u, Matter of DEPOT ENTERPRISES, INC. 5. In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: A. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties, or of properties in adjacent use distt~icts; B. That the use will not prevent the.orderly and reasonable use of permitted er~ legally established uses in the district wherein the proposed use is to be located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use~districts; C. That the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of 'the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location; D. That the use, will be in harmony with and-promote, the general purposes and intent of this chapter (see notations~ infra); E. That the use will be compatible,with-its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and,of the.community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale anti,overall:appearance; F. That-the building in which the. proposed use is hereby authorized must be readily accessible..for fire and.police protection, G. The Board has also. considered subsections-A through P of Article XlI, Section 100-26L~ of the,Zoning: Code. Accordingly. on motion~by Member Wiltons seconded by Chairman Goehrlnger, it was RESOLVED, that permission is hereby GRANTED for a proposed 30 ft. by 60 ft. addition to the.existing~ health club/recreation center building, as. applied; and,SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. This approval~ is subject to the,owner' obtaini,ng all written approvals from the Southold. Town Planning. Board, Suffolk, County Department of Heal,th Services, Southold Town Building Department,. and any other agency having jurisdiction thereunder before occupancy. 2. Outdoor lighting, must be shielded to the ground~ and not be adverse.to neighbering areas. 3. Prior actions and conditions of this. Board shall remain, in full force and effect. u,. This action shall expire two years from the date,of receiv.ing all agency approvals: having jurisdiction for the proposed addition, · r Page 4 - Appeal No~ Dec, ion Rendered June ~ 1994 Matter of DEPOT ENTERPRISES, INC. except when a building permit of the Town of Southold for the addition is in effect and construction activities commenced pursuant to said,permit: Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer. I~±[ton and Dinizio. (Absent were Members Villa and Doyen,) This resolution was duly adopted. Ik GERARD P. GOEHRrNGER. C~t~IRMAN BOARD OF APPEALS PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George RRchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 To: From: Re: PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Richard G. Ward, Chairman Request for Planning Board comments on proposed addition for Depot Enterprises, Inc., Rt. 25, Cutchogue Date: May 25, 1994 In response to your request, this Board had requested a site plan in its letter to Dr. Lizewski dated April 20, 1993. A paid application was received on June 21, 1993, and an additional fee for the second expan.~{on was received on April 11, 1994. However, the attached letter to the applicant dated April 19, 1994, requesting changes/additions to the site plan has not been responded to as of this date. This Board is not in agreement with the Senior Building Inspector's memorandum of April 21, 1994, in which he recommends that the applicant contact the Appeals Board for an amendment of the May 2, 1985 Special Exception. It is this Board's position that the above use is a preexisting, non-conforming use and will require a variance, not an amendment to the Special Exception for the following reasons: The Special Exception that was granted on May 2, 1985, for a private membership club refers to Article III, Section 100-30- (B) 6 and Article VI, Section 100-60 (B) 1 (a) of the 1985 Town Code. Section 100-60 is the Light Business section of the code (the property was zoned LB in 1985) and it refers to Section 100-30 for Special Exceptions. The Special Exception referred to is for an annual membership club that shall not be conducted for profit as a business enterprise. However, Dr. Lizewski indicated verbally on April 7, 1994 that, "this is a business and has always been a business." Page 2 Depot Enterprises, Inc. May 25, 1994 In addition, the Special Exception noted in Section 100-30, which was referred to by the Appeals Board on May 2, 1985, contains five conditions. One is that the club not be conducted for profit. Another is that the use must have three acres. These two conditions were ignored. A third con- dition, that which required a 50 foot setback from a lot line, was amended by the issuance of a variance (#3350). See attached copy of code whicil was in effect in 1985. It is dear to this Board that the best ~olulion to thi~ situation is ~'t~ the applieallt to apply for & ehan~o~ of r. olle. This option has been discussed with Dr. Lizewski. In addition to the above, the Board is concerned with the following outstanding issues: Attached is the temporary Certificate of Occupancy issued on November 6, 1987, which states that it is good only for the life of the building permit. The building permit is dated December 24, 1985 and with an extension it would have expired in 1987. The temporary C.O. indicates that the second floor is non-habitable. However, the second floor is presently in use. At the time of this temporary C.O., health, underwriters,and plumbers certifications were pending. We made an inquiry to the Building Department to determine if any or all of these conditions still exist. In April, the Building Department indicated that the matter would be researched. However, to date we have not received a response. The uses indicated on the site plan approved on July 19, 1985, show two residences and a proposed recreation building. As far as we can determine, the present uses are 3 dentists, a health club, Umbrella Home Care Service, and a residence: a total of four uses. The code permits one use for every 40,000 square feet in this Residential Office District. The property is approximately 1.6 acres. The additional uses were established after the plan was approved. See attached copy of approved plan. If we apply prior interpretation by the Zoning Board of Appeals concerning Petrol Stations to this property, it appears that there is insufficient land use for these uses. Page 3 Depot Enterprises, Inc. May 25, 1994 The property card shows that the property was split by deed on February 2, 1978 without planning subdivision approval. See attached property card. Attached are your memo's concerning the interpretation of the number of uses permitted in Residential Office district. I will be happy to meet with you at your convenience to review this material, but as stated previously the best approach for the applicant is for a change of zone to a business classification. enc. ~uu[hold, ,%1 .Y. TEHPORARY C.O. Certificate O,~ Occupancy 4. ......... Date November 6, ,98 THIS CERTIFIES that the building Recreation Center Location of Pro~ertv 320 Depot Lane Cutchogue · - - h31,f~ ~io: ....................... 's't/~3i ....................... h~iei ' County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ...I. 0..2 ...... Block 02 .... Lot. 0 12. I Subdivision ............................... Filed Map No ......... Lot No .............. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated .... .S.e.p.~ :. I 7, 1985 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 1448 I Z dated De c. 24, 1985 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ......... .... Kac r e.a.r.i o m .q e ~ S:.e.r. ....................................................... The certificate is issued to .. JOSEPH & JUDIE LIZEWSKI ................... ?o¥,,3,:,'~'f~',x' .................... of the aforesaid fiuilding. ' ' '.' Suffolk County Department of Health Approval P e n d i n g' UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO Pending PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED: Temporary C.O. is good only for Subject to State Restrictions. Second floor non-habitable. Zoning Board of Appeals //3322 May Rev. 171)1 Pending the life of the permit..Z~/!~/~ t'~"i;~t? /'Y.~-~. guikling Inspector 2, 1985 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 19, 1994 Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed site plan for Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane, Cutchogue Zoning Di~strict: Residential Office (RO) SCTMg1000-102-2-12.1 & 11 Dear Dr. Lizewski: The Planning Board has received your amended site plan. The following is a preliminary list of changes and or additions that must be made to the site plan. This listing is subject to tho granting of any possible variance by the Board of Appeals and any conditions imposed if a variance is granted. 1. Deed to property. New parking area to be shown as paved. Drainage calculations for parking area must be for an impervious surface. Drainage calculations must be provided for new building additions and elevator structure. Grading and drainage plans shall be based upon site storm water retention, in conformance with Chapter Al08 Highway Specifications. Elevation drawings of the proposed building additions. Floor plans showing all uses on site. Additional screening of 75' to 100' with fruit trees or similar of 3' or 4' in height as requircd by the Board of Appeals in variance No. 4157 dated May 11, 1993. The trees are to be placed north of the volley ball court. '7. Part of the proposed 1800 square foot addition is within the volleyball court and the resolution of this problem must be made clear. The Code requires a four foot landscaped area around the perimeter of the new parking area. However the proposed building addition and the playground intrudes on this landscaped area. One tree of two inch (2") caliper along each forty foot (40') of perimeter of new parking area shall be shown as required by Code. 10. Handicapped parking shall be shown as required by Code. 11. The plan must show must show twenty two feet (22') of back-up space between vertical and parallel parking spaces at the south side of the property. This will require the fence to be moved to the property line. 12. Landscaping must be shown on the amended plan. 13. The type of lighting and its wattage must be shown. Further, all lighting must be shielded to the premises. 14. Sign sketch to scale indicating colors and type of lighting of any proposed outdoor sign. 15. Parking calculations must conform to Article XIX 100-190 of Southold Code. 16. Name of owner of property to the southwest shall be indicated on the site plan. 17. Correct total area on plan to reflect removal of parcel ~102-2-11. Remove this lot designation from the plan. 18. State use of barn and sheds and include this building area in lot coverage. 19. If the volley ball court is moved to clear the proposed addition, review of the variance granted for this court may be required by the Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval and all other required permits must be obtained before any possible final approval by this Board. if you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector In Charge ,! ..: -I ZON-ING Chapter 100 From the CODE of the Town of SOUTHOLD GENERAL CODE PUBLISIIERS CORP. § 100-30 SOUTIIOLD CODE § 100-30 diseases are defined by the Sanitary Code of the Public Health Council of the State of New York. [4 ] Eight thousand/8,000) square feet of lot area shall be provided for each patient bed. Public utility rights-of-way as well as structures and other installations necessary to serve areas within the town, subject to such conditions as the Board of Appeals may impose in order to protect and promote .- the health, safety, appearance and general welfare of' the community and the character of the neighborhood in which the proposed structure is to be constructed. (6) Fraternity houses, golf courses and annual mem- bership clubs catering exclusively to members and their guests, or other recreational facilities open to the public, and accessory playgrounds, beaches, swim- ming pools, tennis courts and recreational buildings, subject to the following requirements: (a) No building or part thereof or any pa~king or ' loading area shall be located within one hundred (100) feet of any street line nor within fifty (50) feet of any lot line. lb) The total area covered by principal and accessory buildings shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the area of the lot. (c) Such use shall not be conducted for profit as a business enterprise. (d} No such use shall occupy a lot with an area of less than three (3) acres. .' (e) The direct source of all exterior lighting shall be shielded from the view of surrounding residential lots. [?} Children's recreation camps organized primarily for seasonal use, subject to the following requirements: (a) No building, tent, activity area or recreation facility shall be less than two hundred (200) feet 10022 § 100-30 ZONING from any lot. line. and any sn. area or recreation facility sh~ therefrom as required Bu/ldings/ntended for use be not less than thirty (30) fe tents, which shall be not les~ [Amended 7-31-73] (b) The minimum lot area s thousand (10,000) squa tent or other principal three thousand (3,000) shall be provided for eat in the buildings or tent (c) All outdoor lighting shielded to eliminate th nearby residential lots, facilities. (d) The sound level of all systems shall not exceed a residential neighborhe (8) Labor camps, farm and following requirements: (a) All farm labor camps structed in conformance · shall not be located near~ than the residence of tl specific review and apl: Appeals. (9) Boat docking facilities for tl accommodation of noncomm~ the following requirements:' (a) There shall be docking or more than two (2) boats and used by the owner . personal use. [Amended 10023 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-60 § 100-52. Building length and separation. A. No building shall exceed o'ne hundred twenty.five 1125) feet in length. B. The minimum distance between principal buildings shall be equal to two (2) times the height of the highest building, and the minimum distance between a principal and an accessory building shall be twenty (20} feet. C. Any inner'court shall have a minimum dimension of sixty (60) feet, and any outer court shall have a minimum dimension of twenty (20~ feet and its depth shall not excee~ its width. § 100-53. Livable floor area. [Added 5-30-75 by L.L. No. Each dwelling unit in a multiple dwelling in the M.'I Gene Multiple-Residence District shall have a livable floor area of not less than eight hundred fifty (850~ square feet, except that a one. bedroom or studio dwelling unit shall have.a livable floor area of. nog less than six hundred (6001 square feet. ARTICLE VI B Light Business Distrlct § 100-60. Use reguiations. In a B District, no building or premises shall be used, and no building or part of a building shall be erected or altered wi~icv arranged, intended or designed ro be used, in whole or in part. any uses except the following: A. Permitted uses, subject to site plan approval by Planning Board in accordance with Article XIII hen~:. [Amended 10-26-76 by L.L. No. 5-1976; 2-1-$$ by L.L. 2-19831 (1) Any permitted uses set forth in, and as regulated the following provisions of this chapter: ia) Subsection A(21 and (3) of § 100.30. (b) Subsection A(3) of § 100-40. § 100-60 ZONING (2) Business, professional and g (3) Banks and financial instituti (4) Re'all storee. (5) Restaurants. (6) Bakeshops (for on-premises s (7) Laundromats and similar est, (8) Personal service stores and s (9} Marinas for the docking, of noncommercial boats, includ oil primarily for the use of b, such marina.*: B. Uses permitted by special except Appeals. The following uses are exception by the Board of Ap provided, subject to site plan app~ Board in accordance with Article [1) [Amended 10-26-76 by L.L. exception use set forth in, and following provisions of this ch: (a) Subsection B(2} to (13), (b) Subsection B(2), (4) and C. Accessory uses. [Amended 5-30-75 26.76 by L.L. No. 5-1976] (D Accessory uses on the same lot incidental to any permitted use separate business. (2) Signs, subject to the following (a) Detached or ground signs. C double, faced, not more thru !nches in height and twelve ( in width, the lower edge of w 10032 10033 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-60 g length and separation. shall exceed one hundred twenty, five (125) feet am distance between principal buildings shall be .,o 12) times the height of the highest building, inimum distance between a principal and an ~ullc[ing shall be twenty (20) feet. :oart shall have a minimum dimension of sixty and any Outer court shall have a minimum )f twenty (20) feet and its depth shall not exceed flOor area. [Added 5-30-75 by L.L. No. 3-1975] mit in a multiple dwelling in the M-1 General : District shall have a livable floor area of not ~dred fifty (850) square feet, except that a one- dwelling unit shall have a livable fl')or area of hundred (600} square feet. · ARTICLE VI B Light Business District ulations. no buildlng or premises shall be used, and no a building shall be erected or altered which is or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for ~e following: ~ses, subject to site plan approval by the ~ard in accordance w/th Article XIII hereof. )'25-76 by L.L. No. 5-1976; 2-1-83 by L.L. No. rnltted USes set forth in. and as regulated by, Wing provisions of this chapter: section At21 .and (3) of § 100-30. ;ection AI3~ of § 100-40. 10032 § ~00-60 ZONING § 100-60 (2) Business, professional and governmental offices. (3) Banks and financial institutions. (4) Retail stores. (5) Restaurants. (6) Bakeshops (for on-premises sale at retail). (7) Laundromats and similar establishments. (8) Personal service stores and shops. (9) Marinas for the docking, mooring and accommodation of noncommercial boats, including the sale of fuel and oil primarily for the use of boats accommodated in such marina? B. Uses permitted by special exception by the Board of Appeals. The following uses are permitted as a special exception by the Board of Appeals, as hereinafter provided, subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board in accordance with Article XIII hereof: .' (1) [Amended 10-26-76 by L.L. No. 5-1976] Any special exception use set forth in, and as regulated by, the following provisions of this chapter: (a) Subsection B(2) to (13), inclusive, of § 100-30. {b) Subsection B(2), (4) and (5) of § 100-50. C. Accessory uses. [Amended 5-30-75 by L.L. No. 3-1975; 10- 26-76 by L.L. No. 5-1976] (1) Accessory uses on the same lot with and customarily incidental to any permitted use and not involving a separate business. (2) Signs, subject to the following requirements: (a} Detached or ground signs. One (1) sign, single- or double-faced, not more than six (6) feet slx (6) inches in height and twelve (12) feet six (6) inches in width, the lower edge of which shall be not less ,Mark $. %! Kennczh L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD .MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Gerard p. Goehringer, Chairman and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals Richard G. Ward, Chairman and -~ Me~ers of the Planning Board Ma~ 25, 1993 Petrol Stations SCTM ~ 1000-109-1-23 Soulhold. New York 1197 i Fax ($16) 765-1823 Thank you for your response of May 5, 1993 regarding the above-named site. In our review of same, other questions up. Came Your memo indicates that while the residence was net in use at the time the retail antiques shop was converted to a professional office, it was converted to a combination residence · and real estate office at Some later date. Has the Zoning Board ~/~.,~,/been able to determine whether this conversion occurred before ~/~..~Q~ or after the Februarv 23. 1 ~,.~,.~ N Code? _ . ~89 enactment of the new Zoning We are confused about the use of the barn. ~n the memo, the Use of the barn is described as a storage site for antiques owned by the resident of the house. The property owner indicated to us in a letter that the barn was an antiques store The Certificate ..... of Occupancy issued by the Building Inspector i~ 1993 notes that the building was used asa "seasonal antiques store".' Is the ~ '/Zoning Board saying that it has deter ~commerclal Use ~ ~- ~ ..... .mined that there was no ~ ~ , ' archit~+,_ ~ un= m=~n Prlor to its conversion to an When the current Zoning Code was drafted, our understanding of the PUrpose of the Residential office district was that it would Provide for limited non-residential uses along with existing 'residential Uses of existing homes. This seems to have been echoed by the Zoning Board in its September 5, 1985 memorandum, COpy attached, in which the ZBA elucidated its position that a ......... ~ .......... ~~¢d.~c ~r ~ ~-~ .... Also in keepinq with this, we understood that the 40,000 square foot requirement for each additional use applied only to additional uses beyond the existing residence with one accessory office use. This reasoning was based on the fact that many if not most RO lots are about one acre in size. If the intent was to allow these lots to accomodate both a principal residential Use with an accessory office use then it would make sense to require the addition of 40,000 sq. ft. of land only when the addition of a third use was contemplated. If, however, we are reading the memorandum correctly, the Zoning Board of Appeals has ruled that in the instant case of Petrol Stations, the residential use of a house along with a small real estate office constitutes two principal uses; and that the architect,s office constitutes the third principal Use. And, consequently, 120,000 squ~re feet of land is required. Our Confusion about this point is due to the fact that the property OWner, in a letter dated April 14, 1993, a copy of which is attached for your convenience, identifies the residential use of the existing house as a residential ~ apartment. It may be 'that the property owner or a member of his ~ ./ family resides here and that the real-estate ~' ,' family-run bus~ ..... office is a / ~*~=~. hOWever, the May 5th memorandu/a describes ( the residence as a rental apartment, which seems to contradict ',.-.the OWner's assertion. But perhaps We'misunderstood the ~J '! memorandum~ · We also would appreciate clarification as to what the Zoning Board is saying here about residential use of a house in the RO : district. We are not sure if you are making a distinction : between a principal use of a residence as the owner's dwelling with an accessory family owned real estate office and that of a residence which the owner' rents while also continuing to run the ~,'~,, ~a~.es~te ~usiness? If the Zoning Board is making that ~,,- ~s~nc~lon tor all RO properties the ...... ,~ . , Knowing, for future reference w~ ~u_~ w~u~u appreciate ~ real estate of=~-- _ = , ~ u~sElngu1snes an accessory ~"',~5 ~ in the RO district. · . ajcu~use zrom a principal real estate office use ~£~'ac('' . . .. ~nally, in reference to a question posed in our pre~ious memo, lZ all or any of these uses existed before the enactment of the 1989 Zoning Code, how do you interpret their non-conforming status? The primary question in our minds is how to accomodate the three uses, density-wise, given What Seems to be their non-conforming status. As stated in Previous paragraphs of this ~ memo, Our understanding of their non-conforming status led us to · / the Conclusion that a sum total of only 80,000 square feet is C--needed for the three uses on thd site. Your memorandum seems to 3c~,f:,l,~6 indicate otherwise. Are we interpreting it accurately? James Dinizio. Jn Rot:~rt A. Villa Richard C. x, Vil~n Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOAi{D OF APPEALS TOV~N OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Telephone ~$16) 7 ~5-1~00 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Richard G. Jerry Goehringer, Chairman, May 5, 1993 Ward, Chairman, PB i .... ~ ,,it.. ii ~: ZBA ~'I.! ~ --,,. h Petrol Stations Ltd. CTM ~1000-109-1-23 Our File No. 3972 Thank you for your memorandum requesting our review and response concerning the above property, its uses, and proposed subdivision proposal. You may recall that we also have an application, which has not been amended by the applicant or his attorney to show the new plan before you. (The building inspector initially issued a Notice of Disapproval in 1990.) HISTORY OF.USE AND PROPERTY SIZE: We would like to note for the record the following information about the buildings and property as existed prior to 1987, and apparently a Pre-C.O. was issued: ~ 1) two-story frame house 2) accessory two-story wood-framed garage (or barn) building used for the storage of antique furniture and similar items by the resident of the house 3) two accessory sh~ds 4) property size in acres: 5.836; 5) lot width: 150.30 feet frontage along the Main Road. PRIOR SITE PL~{ APPROVAL Subsequently, during 1986 or 1987, an application was made, we understand, to the Planning Board for site plan approval to convert the garage (barn building), from antique storage to an architect,s office -- and maps confirmed that the front building was vacant. At the time of the issuance of the Building Permit on December 15, 1987, the front building was not occupied for mixed Uses as a real estate appraiser's business and rental residential unit. Some time later the front dwelling structure was then occupied for mixed use, not only by a rental apartment unit on the second floor but also for a real estate office. Occupancy prior to 1986 on 5.8 acre parcel: Principal use: one. A single-family dwelling use. Accessory buildings: three (3) which included an accessory use for antiques. No other principal use existed prior to 1986. Occupancies at this time on the 5.8 acre parcel: Principal uses: three. 1. Rental residential unit in front building; 2. Separate Architect's Office in barn building; 3. separate real estate office on first floor in front building. SUBDIVISION APPLICATION The application presently being reviewed by the Planning Board is for a four lot minor subdivision - different from the original filing for a three-lot minor with a different layout. The maps on file previously did not show 'the converted uses (now occupying the premises), and the map was amended to show two principal uses:~ architect's office in rear building and real estate appraisers in front building. The residential rental unit in the front building is noted as the third use although it is not shown on the newest map revised 12/1/92. P.B. QUESTIONS: In answer to both Questions 1 and 2: 1. a variance will be required to consider allowing three principal uses on less than a 120,000 sq. ft. parcel. Please note that 5.8 acre parcel is proposed with a substantial reduction - and lot area nonconformities will be created. Each principal use in thc RO zone requires 40,000 sq. ft. of land area whether it be nonresidential or residential. A new proposal showing 120,000 sq. ft. of land area for the three principal uses to be continued must reduce the number of lots in this minor subdivision. In any event a variance application will also be required for insufficient width for thc rear lots as drawn, and reduced frontage along the Main Road for a new right-of-way from 150.30 feet to 124.85 feet. If we may be assistance in any way, please let us know. Gerard P. Goehnnger, Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr. James Din£zio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Richard C. Wil~on Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOAILD OF APPF~RLS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RO. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971· Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-i800 July 30, 1993 William C. Goggins, Esq. McNulty-Spiess 633 East Main Street P.O. Box 757 "Riverhead, NY 11901-0757 Re: Proposed Filing of Special Exception Contract Vendees: W. Droskoski'and S. Owner-Seller: C. Charnews .Dear Mr. Goggins: DeFriest In reviewing the documents left with our office for review, we find that they are noz acceptable for filing or further processing for the following reasons: a) Application Form ZB2 The applicant for - You have modified the form. .non-profit .the Special Exception is reqq/ired to be the organization as the OWner or tenant.having a direct · interest of the property. The OWners in the excerpt from the '~-.-..~cgntract of sale furnished shows that neither the present OWner, · '..:~nor the contract vendees, are the non-profit ..'.' .:~he special exception use; ~'Z~'~"-.:". ,' ~; ~ ' organization for 'is b) Section 100-30B(7) _ A minimum of three acres of land ,..j. required for _ . ' the three acres a .non profit member.ship cluJs. Please delineat h wPhl~ee ~hlei~ which would be apPlled strictly to t~' e ~ rd eaartee _th.e Uses and purpose of th . .als Use, and enclosed wi~- pti.mary or second . e .remaining are SUch as ~=~?,,~a a bualdin~ ~-~ _ ary, including tha~ ~ as and -~ ~a£lce -~ ~ ="~ proposed ~.,- -~ ~ =~ca · q=C. USUally s~.~._u°raqe, .Parking, Screen~U=l~e of an.y bulldin _ ,,~a on a S~te plan: q, egress, ~ngress, g c) A Certified copy of the certificate of incorporation, in complete form, Will be needed. d) A copy of the gurrcnt deed of the Premises is required. e) If applicant is a tenant-corporation, a copy of the signed lease, together with a written consent, from the property owner is necessary for the processing of this application. f) Application Paragraph B must be completed which will list the reasons this use would be in harmony with the standards and guidelines established in the Southold Town Zoning Code and · applicable law for approval of this special exception. g) Letter of intent as to whether or not any other buildings or structures are proposed for this property. h) Notice Form with proof of mailing of notices to adjacent property owners and postmarked certified-mail receipts. i) Written disclosure of officers and directors of the Long Island Sports Committee Inc. and any and all other persons, groups or entities involved with property or these uses is requested. -. For the above reasons, the documentation and personal $400.00 check from D & D Cycles, Inc. are returned. You may submit new forms and the above documentation at a later date · when you feel it is appropriate under the circumstances. .' Very truly yours,. En61osures cc: D & D Cycles, Inc. Corner of Cox and Route Cutchogue, NY 11935 Linda Kowalski Clerk of the Board 48 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NE~V YORK APPEAL FRO,M DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TO~,Vhi OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. DATE .............................. Name of Appellant Sireet and Number Cutchogue ........................ . ...... .N...Y....'.J..J_..9.:3..~.....~ iEREBY APPE,~,L TO Municipality State or&or DecisLon under AppZ. No~ 4157 THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM/THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR O;q APPLICATION FORX[lJ~v~l~'xX~©~< ..×.~.~,t.~Q.¢,~/..e.C,~.J,~.nDATED .......... ~,ft~...~.:~,....~q:~.3. ............... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ( ) ( ) ( x) same basis Notice of OisapprovaZ Name of Applicant for permit of Street' ,and Number .... h4unicipalib/ Stole PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY modify location of accessory volleyball court from north property.line I. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ....... 3-20--.O~p,~;...b,,a,~.~..~;~.nd,...2293.25...FL~ .n, oAd ........ f.~.[}. Zone 5tree~ /tla. fflleg / Use District on Zonin9 Distr~ct 1000 Section102 Block2 Lot J2.~ ~ ~'~'"~Z ........................................... :..uurre,~t ~ner Depot Enterprises ~'nc. ' Lot No. PrJor Owner 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the A~t/cle Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do nat quote the Ordinance.) Article VII Section 10071~ f100-31~-4, 100-33) and prior ZBA ACTZON 5/11/93 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is mode herewith for (please check appropriate box) (X X) A VARIANCE to the Z~ning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chop. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 (.X) modify location o~ accessory volleyball court 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous cppeaI (has) (x~t] been made with respect to this decision Of the Building Inspector or~wlth respect to this property. ' Such ~ppeal was (x) request for a special permit , . Ix ) request for a variance crnd was made in Appeal No ........... 4.1.5.~ .......... Dated ........ g/..14_.~(,9.g.;....~j~...~....~..c/..¥.. . REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because 2. The hardship created is i, UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because WOULD NOT CHANGE THE STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss COUNTY Of Su~£ol.k ) ~ ~~1 by Joseph Lizewski Sworn to this ............. '.~.. ....................... day o( " '"'t~'CUl~ ........................... 19 94 " Notary Public UNDA R KOWALSKi ~ I~1~, ~tat~ of Ne~ York No. 62-4624771 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Richard C. Wilton Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD M£MORANDUM Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Chairman. Planning Board Attn: Bob Kassner Office of the Board of Appea May 17. 199q Proposed Addition - Depot Enterprises. Inc. (S.E.) RO Zone District - 1000-:22 ~ 77 /o~Z~.~-// As a coordination in,the aboveapplicatio~, please confirm whether or not the Planning Board has received the above application and. if not. if you would like to provide a recommendation to the applicant or an alternative for the applicant pursue. Attached is a print of the proposed site pla~ sho~ing the area of the proposed addition. which is the subject of a Special Exception appli~Lio~ at this time. Thank you. Attachment cc: Applicant MAY I 8 S0UTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: COMMENTS: ~ CO'/DI'CS S~-~F ROJECT LD. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only SEQR be completed by Appl[csnt or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT /SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Village Commons Village Commons Municipamy Southold Cou,~ly Suffol 14. PREClSE LOCAriON(StreetaddressanUroadintersectl°ns, p~°rninent,landmarks'etc''°~pruvi~jl';"'ap)320 Depot Lane, Cutchogue, New York 11935 5. IS PROPOSED ACrlON: ~NNING BOARD 6. DESCR~BEPROJECT~R&EFLY: ad~&~8 [800 ~oT ~dd&t&o~a[ s2ace ~o opeTa~e the hea[bh c~ub ~ocated bheTeat. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED; two ( 2 ) In/HaPly ~WO(20 acres U[tima[ely acFns 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ~ Commcrcial ~ Agriculture ~ p;,rklForesl/Open spat,: ~ Othe~ ~ Re~idential ~ Indus[Raj Desc,~b~: property is located east of an automobile service station, a convenience store and other retail establishments, and perpendicular to a h8TdwaTe stoTe. STATE OR LOCAL)? ~Yes ~No If yes, llst agency(s) and peFmitlapprovais Health Department Appllcan~lspom;or ~amo; Joseph_ Lizewsgi o.~: April 18, 19[ 4 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete tho Coastal Assessment Forn'~ before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 If yes, coordinate the rewew process and use the FULL EAF. -- - (:]Yes B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN S NYCRR, PART 617.67 If NO, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. . COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WiTH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, soJld waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or Intensity of use of land or other ?tural resources? Explain brief C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C57 Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use ol either quantity or type of energy)? ExplAin bdetly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No If Yes, explain brielly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIF_!CANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For e~ch adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its ia) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of OCCurring; (c} duration; id) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and if) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or referefl~e"S'Ol:l~l~g~matadals EnSUre that explanattons contain sufficmnt detad to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and~e~uately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or sfgnificant adverse impacts which MAY occuc Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaratiOn. ~ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any Supporting documentation, that the proposed act[on WILL NOT result in any. significant adverse environmental Impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the'r~asons supporting this determination: Dale 2 pROJECT I,D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C Slate Environmental Qualily Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENI' FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only 'ART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) SEQR 1. APPLICANT /SPONSOR Village Commons 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipafily Southold County Suffol] 4. PRECISE LOCAflON (Street address and road inlersections, p¢ominent landmark.% elm, or provide map) 320 Depot Lane, Cutchogue, New York 11935 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion [] Modmcation/alleFation 2. PROJECT NAME Village Commons MAY & 994 P,..ANNING BOARD 6. DESCR~BEPROJECTSRIEFLY: adding 1800 square feet to south side of building for additional space to operate the health club located thereat. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: I.ma,y ._t w o_( 20 ac,es UllimateJy t wu' ( 2 ) 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY With EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESFRICIIONS? [] Yes [] No Il No, describe brielly 9. WNAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ~ Residential ~ Industrial ~ Comme,cial ~ AgricultuFe Describe: property is located east of an automobile service station, a convenience store and other retail establishments, and perpendicular to a hardware store. 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM AHY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL. STATE OR LOCAL)? ~Yes ~No If yes, lis~ agency(s) and permlt/app¢ovals Health Department 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE AOTIOH HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID. PERMI~ OR APPROVAL7 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICAHON7 I CERTIFY THAT THE INFQRMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO TIlE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE 5 ..0 If the action is in tho Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form beforo proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT [To be coropleted by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. --7': [] Yes [] N o B. WILL ACT[ON RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS iN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If NO, a negative declaratio_n. may be superseded by another involved agency. r-lyes r"l No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, il legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential lot erosion, (~rainage or flooding problems? ExpJain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultura~ resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildllfe species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briafly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity ct use of land or other natural resources? Explain brtefiy C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C57 E~plain briefly. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTtAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] NO If Yes, explain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) iNSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, Important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with [ts (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability o[ occurring; (c) duration; (d) [rreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference SUl~perting materials. Ensure tha, t explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been Ident~fied and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. -:;- :- .-- ~r~ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any Supporting documentation, that the proposed actfon WILL NOT result in any. significant adverse environmental Impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the'¢easons supporting this determination: Date 2 [~PROJECT LO. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Qnly 'ART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) SEQR 1. APPLICANT ¢SEONSOR Village Commons 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipalily Southold 2. PROJECT NAME Village Commons Cou,~ly S u f f o 1 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections prominent landmarks, elc.. ur pruvide map) 320 Depot TL, ane, Cutchogue, New York 1193.5 ~LANNING BOARD 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] Nevi [] Expansion [] Modilicationlal/eralion 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: adding 1800 square feet to south side of building for additional space to operate the health club located thereat. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Inillall¥ tWO ( 20 *¢res UlJimamly two( 2 ) ac,es 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESFRICTiONE? [] Yes [] No II No, describe brielly g, WHAT I$ PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial [] Agriculture L~ Parkl~-()r,:stlOpen r;pacu [] Omer e.sc,~be: property is located east of an automobile service station, a convenience store and other retail establishments, and perpendicular to a hardware store. 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOV'; OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHEF~ GOVEI~tIMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? [~] Yes ~No I[ yes, list agency(s} and pe~mit/approvaIs Health Department 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION RAVE A CURRENTLY VALID. PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] No If yes, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WiLL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICAIION? [] Yes [] No I CERTIFY THAT TNE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO Tile RIST OF MY KNOWLEDGE t April 18, 19' If the action is in tho Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessmer,t Form before proceeding with this assessmenl OVER 1 PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTtON EXCEED ANY TYPE [ THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 If yes, coordinate the review process and uss Ihs FULL EAF. -'' [] Yes [] No 8. W~LL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS iN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 It No, a negative de(;laratlof) may be superseded by another involved agency. C. COULD ACTION RESULT tN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traRIc patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or tloodlng problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other n. aturat resources? Explain briefl C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. CS. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C57 Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. iS THERE, OR iS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACTS? [] Yes [] No if Yes, explain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIF~!CANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each ~dverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of. occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materlala. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. :~hen proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. -~, :- :- , ~ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting' documeRtation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any. significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the'¢(~asons supporting this determination: Hame oi Lead Agency Town Halt, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765.1823 Telephone (516) 765-1802 April 21. 199q OFFICE OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Joseph J. Lizewski. D.D.S. Depot Enterprises. Inc. Depot Lane g Main Road Cutchogue. NY 11935 Re: Building Permit Application for a New Addition 1000-102-2-12.1 (exclusive of Lot 11) Dear Dr. Lizewski: After reviewing the Board of Appeals' records pertaining to your premises located along Depot Lane and the Main Road. I find that the principal use of this property as a recreational, club was approved under the B-Light zoning use in effect in 1985 when the building permits were issued and pursuant to the Special- Exception issued by the Board of Appeals. The use. having said approvals, would continue under the current code regulations~ as a Special: Exception rather than a nonconforming use; ref. Section 100-261 of the Zoning Cede which reads, in part: ...There is hereby created a category of land use approval to be known as "special exception uses." Said uses. may not be con~enced, created, undertaken, carried out, or thereafter maintained; or substantially expanded w~thout a special exception approval f~rst having been obtained therefor~ which special exception approval shall be granted for the use by the Zoning Board of Appeals according to the provisions for the particular special exception use set forth' ~n th~s Article or elsewhere in th~s chapter. Any land use, ~ncluding the erection, construction ...shall be a special exception use ... required a special exception approval ~f the text of thJs chapter or the use schedule hereof denotes the use as being either the subject of a special exception use or simply a special exception use .... APR 2 2 1994 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Joseph J. Lizewski. D, April 21. 1994 Since there has been 'no change pertaining to this particular use. it is our recommendation that you contact the Board of Appeals directly as to whether or not that board would~ require an amendment under the 198S Special Exception. if applicable, Therefore. a variance under the use provlsions, of the Zoning Cede will not be necessary for the proposed additien. It is important, however, to reiterate that all other code regulations; including the N.Y.S. Fire and~Building Code. will. of course, apply~ Very truly yours. CC: Thomas H. Fisher Sr. Building Inspector Laury Dowd. Town Attorney R. Ward. Chairman. Town Planning Board G. Goehringer. Chairman. Town Zoning Board of Appeals PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Or~owski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephona (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 19, 1994 Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane Cutchog~e, NY 11935 RE: Proposed site plan for Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane, Cutchogue Zoning District: Residential Office (RO) SCTM%1000-102-2-12.1 & 11 Dear Dr. Lizewski: The Planning Board has received your amended site plan. The following is a preliminary list of changes and or additions that must be made to the site plan. This listing is subject to the granting of any possible variance by the Board of Appeals and any conditions imposed if a variance is granted. 1. Deed to property. 2. New parking area to be shown as paved. Drainage calculations for parking area must be for an impervious surface. Drainage calculations must be provided for new building additions and elevator structure. Grading and drainage plans shall be based upon site storm water retention, in conformance with Chapter A108 Highway Specifications. 4. Elevation drawings of the proposed building additions. 5. Floor plans showing all uses on site. Additional screening of 75' to 100' with fruit trees or similar of 3' or 4' in height as required by the Board of Appeals in variance No. 4157 dated May 11, 1993. The trees are to be placed north of the volley ball court. ¸7. Part of the proposed 1800 square foot addition is within the volleyball court and the resolution of this problem must be made clear. The Code requires a four foot landscaped area around the perimeter of the new parking area. However the proposed building addition and the playground intrudes on this landscaped area. 10. One tree of two inch (2") caliper along each forty foot (40') of perimeter of new parking area shall be shown as required by Code. Handicapped parking shall be shown as required~¥ Code. 11. 12. 13. The plan must show must show twenty two feet (22') of back-up space between vertical and parallel parking spaces at the south side of the property. This will require the fence to be moved to the property line. Landscaping must be shown on the amended plan. The type of lighting and its wattage must be shown. Further, all lighting must be shielded to the premises. 14. 15. Sign sketch to scale indicating colors and type of lighting of any proposed outdoor sign. Parking calculations must conform to Article XIX 100-190 of Southold Code. 16. 17. Name of owner of property to the southwest shall be indicated on the site plan. Correct total area on plan to reflect removal of parcel $102-2-11. Remove this lot designation from the plan. 18. 19. State use of barn and sheds and include this building area in lot coverage. If the volley ball court is moved to clear the proposed addition, review of the variance granted for this court may be required by the Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval and all other required permits must be obtained before any possible final approval by this Board. if you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. ~--Kle~-~d G/ Ward Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector In Charge DATE: SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: COMMENTS: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER iii APR I 3- ~0~ SOUTHOLD TOVCN PLANNING BOARD - SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: COMMENTS: CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT New Suffolk Road, PO Box 930, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Telephone (516) 734-6907 * Fax (516) 734-7079 October 31, 1993 Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Southold Town Planning Bd. Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Ref. Dr. Joseph Lizewski Property Dear Mr. Ward, Reference the above estate and map. It is the opinion of the Board that a well is not required at this time. If there are any changes, please advise. Yours truly, Board of Fire Commissioners Secretary mjm/ NOV 3 Igg~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS R/chard G. Ward, Chairman C~orge Rltchle Latham. Jr. Bennett Orlowskl, Jr. Mark $. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hail. 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765 - 1823 November 3, 1993 Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane, Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Site Plan for Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane, Cutchogue Zoning District: Residential Office SCTM~ 1000-2-12.1 & 11 (RO) Dear Dr. Lizewski: The Planning Board on October 22, 1993, received your undated revised site plan. In addition to the items in the Board's letter to you dated June 11, 1993, (copy enclosed), the following changes/additions must be made before the Board can proceed with its review: Building elevations for all new facades and floor plans showing the proposed use of floor area. A separate key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within (500) feet, as shown on the latest tax records, at a scale of one (1) inch equals one hundred (100) feet. 3. Date of plan or revision. Existing contours with intervals of (2) feet or referred to mean sea level as per United States Geological survey datum. less, In addition to the above, a sketch of any proposed signs, showing color and dimensions must be provided. An amended application and short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF) showing the new additions must be provided. The fee adjustment for the new building additions is ($0.025) times the total square footage of new building areas. Nine copies of the revised plan are required and five copies of the final plan with the Health Department stamp must be provided before any possible final approval. The above list should not be considered a complete list, Article XXV 100-256 of the Town Code should be consulted for complete technical data required. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Chairman cc: Thomas Fisher, Building Inspector In Charge June 11:1993 Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed site plan for Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane, Cutchogue Zoning District: Residential Office (RO) SCTM%1000-102-2-12.1 & 11 Dear Dr. Lizewski: On May 14, 1993, the Planning Board received your hand delivered plan, marked final site plan. The following changes and or additions to the plan and additional data must be received before the Board can proceed with its review: Name and address of the person, firm or organization preparing the map, sealed with the applicable New York State license seal and signature. 2. Date of survey and site plan. 3. Scale at 1" = 20". 5. Deed to property. 6. Existing zoning, including zone lines and dimensions. Drainage calculations for parking area. Grading and drainage plans shall be based upon site storm water retention, in conformance with Chapter A108 Highway Specification. Landscaping must be shown for new parking area and percentage landscaped for entire site. Paved areas including parking areas, sidewalks, and vehicular access between the site and public streets. 10. Building area, lot area and percent of lot coverage must be indicated. 11. Parking spaces and parking calculations for entire site. 12. Location and details of fencing (type and location). 13. Additional screening of 75' to 100' north of the volley ball court. In lieu of elevation drawings for the elevator enclosure and second story addition, please indicate the type of roofing and siding material to be used. Ail outdoor lighting must be shielded to the premises. Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval must be obtained before any possible final approval by this Board. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Curtis Horton, Senior Building Inspector SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER OOT 2 2 1993 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Mathew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Martin: Enclosed please find (2) surveys pda~osF~ ~/f~ ~J~ F°~ Please notify this office as to whether any fire wells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by /o-~ ! cooperation. ,19~. Thank you for your enc. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'IT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 June 11, 1993 Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed site plan for Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane, Cutchogue Zoning District: Residential Office (RO) SCTM#1000-102-2-12.1 & 11 Dear Dr. Lizewski: On May 14, 1993, the Planning Board received your hand delivered Plan, marked final site plan. The following changes and or additions to the plan and additional data must be received before the Board can proceed with its review: Name and address of the person, firm or organization preparing the map, sealed with the applicable New York State license seal and signature. 2. Date of survey and site plan. 3. Scale at 1" = 20". 5. Deed to property. 6. Existing zoning, including zone lines and dimensions. Drainage calculations for parking area. Grading and drainage plans shall be based upon site storm water retention, in conformance with Chapter Al08 Highway Specification. Landscaping must be shown for new parking area and percentage landscaped for entire site. Paved areas including parking areas, sidewalks, and vehicular access between the site and public streets. 10. B~ilding area, lot area and percent of lot coverage must be indicated. tl. Parking spaces and parking calculations for entire site. 12. Location and details of fencing (type and location). 13. Additional screening of 75' to 100' north of the volley ball court. In lieu of elevation drawings for the elevator enclosure and second story addition, please indicate the type of roofing and siding material to be used. Ail outdoor lighting must be shielded to the premises. Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval must be obtained before any possible final approval by this Board. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. neel, Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Curtis Horton, Senior Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 June 4, 1993 Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed site plan for Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane, Cutchogue Zoning District: Residential Office (RO) SCTM9 1000-2-12.1 & 11 Dear Dr. Lizewski: On May 14, 1993, the Planning Board received your hand delivered site plan, marked final site plan. The Planning Board will be unable to review this plan until a ApPlication, Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF) and an application fee of one hundred fifty dollars ($150) plus two and five-tenths cents ($0.025) per square fdot of new building area is received by the Board. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Chairman cc: Curtis Horton, Senior Building Inspector Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. C~ehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr. Jame~ Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Richard C. Wilton Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF $OUTHOLD May 20, 1993 SCOTT L. HARR/S Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Joseph Lizewski, D.D.S. Depot Enterprises, Inc. Depot Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Appl. No. 4157 - Variance for Outside Lighting/Volleyball Court) at Village Commons Recreational Facility Dear Dr. Lizewski: Please find attached for your permanent records a copy of the Findings and Determination rendered by the Board of Appeals in the above matter. Please be sure to contact the Building Department and any other agency which may be involved for issuance of appropriate permits before commencing construction activities. We are this date also providing copies of the Board's determination to the Building Department and Planning Board for their update and recordkeeping. A copy has also been transmitted to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with the Suffolk County Administrative Code concerning variance referrals (for projects within 500 feet of a State or County highway). Very truly yours, C Enclosure Copies of Decision to: Building Department Planning Board/,~- Linda Kowalski SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard R Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Richard C. Wilton Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Appl. No. 4157: Matter of the Application of Application of DEPOT ENTERPRISES, INC. for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII, Section 100-71C (which refers to 100-31C-4, 100-33) of the residential accessory use provisions), for permission to establish and locate accessory outdoor recreational area with outdoor lighting incidental to the main use of the premises. Location of Property: 320 Depot Lane, and 29325 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY; County Tax Map Parcel ID No. 1000-102-2-12.1. Subject premises is zoned Residential-Office (RO) and contains a total lot area of 1.6+- acres. WHEREAS, after due notice, public hearings were held on March 18, 1993 and on April 22, 1993, and at said hearings all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. This is an application requesting permission to locate outdoor recreational area with outdoor lighting as accesory uses incidental to the main use of this property. Submitted as part of this application are sketches showing a proposed volleyball court, fence areas, and the proposed lighting. 2. The property is located in the Residential-Office (RO) Zone District is contains a total area of approximately 1.6 acres, of which 147.39 feet fronts along the north side of the Main State Road and 173.13 feet fronts along the east side of Depot Lane. 3. The subject premises is bounded on the north by residences; on the west along Depot Lane by a gasoline station Page 2 - Appl. No. 4157 Matter of DEPOT ENTERPRISES, INC. Decision Rendered May 11, 1993 and a house all located in the Hamlet Business Zone District. North of the Hamlet-Business Zone is the Cutchogue West School which is improved with the school's main building and outside playgrounds and outside recreational areas. To the south is the Main State Highway and property zoned R-40 Low-Residential. 4. The location of the proposed outside recreational court and lighting is generally north of the existing parking lot with setbacks at not closer than 24 feet from the northerly property line and at least 30 feet from the easterly property line. The lighting is shown to be at each of the four corners of the volleyball court. 5. It is the position of the Board in considering this application that: (a) the circumstances are uniquely related to the property and there is no method feasible for appellant to pursue other than a variance - particularly since a substantial part of the buildable areas of this parcel consists of "front yards" - that area extending east from Depot Lane and that area extending north from the Main State Highway; (b) requirements; the relief is not substantial in relation to the (c) the relief requested will not cause a substantial effect on available governmental facilities since the areas are not enclosed buildings and is directly related to the main use of the premises ~recreational club) and not involving a separate business; (d) the variance will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience, or order of the town, or be adverse to neighboring properties since the proposed building will be located with an adequate setback and buffer area from the northerly property line at 32+- feet; (e) there will be no adverse undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties created by the location of the volleyball courts in the front yard area; (f) the relief sought by applicant cannot be achieved by another method other than an area variance; (g) the proposed variance will not'have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in this neighborhood or zone district; Page 3 - Appl. N 4157 Matter of DEPOT ENTERPRISES, INC. Decision Rendered May 11, 1993 (h) the difficulty is related to the uniqueness of the property and is not self-created; (i) the relief requested will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. Accordingly, on motion by Member Dinizio, seconded by Member Wilton, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief as requested under Appl. No. 4157, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That the lighting, which is proposed for seasonal playing of volleyball, be out by 10:00 p.m.; 2. That additional screening be added to provide a staggered (or straight) buffer, inside the applicant's property line, for a distance of between 75 ft. and 100 ft. in length; screening shall be with fruit trees (or similar) at planted at a height of ~hree (or fou~)~e~t, and maintained in good condition at all times for screening purposes; 3. That the use of the court be for the playing of volleyball and remain accessory and incidental to the main use of the premises in accordance with the Special Exception granted May 2, 1985 under Application No. 3322 for a private recreational club. The use of the volleyball courts may not be operated as a separate business. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Dinizio, Wilton and Goehringer. (Absent were: Members Villa and Doyen). This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERARD p. GOEHRINGER,/~HAIRMAN Memorandum To File FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer DATE: May 14, 1993 SUBJECT: Dr. Joseph Lizewski On this date Dr. Lizewski came into the Planning Board office with a plan for his Village Commons Club. Dr. Lizewski showed me the plan and said, Tony (the surveyor) wants to know what else you want on the plan. I told Dr. Lizewski that there were many items missing, such as the seal of the surveyor, the date of the site plan and survey, parking calculations etc. Dr. Liezski requested that I send him a list of all missing items. I told him that I would send such a letter. .SENDER: SUBJECT: SC~4~: COr~MENTS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-I823 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Richard G. Ward, Chairman April 22, 1993 Depot Enterprises, Inc. Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM~ 1000-102-2-12.1 Board of Appeals a/k/a Village commons The Planning Board would like to comment on Appl. No. 4157 as referenced above. This Board does not have an amended site plan application for the location and construction of the existing outdoor recreational facility (Volleyball Court) and lighting. Several submissions of preliminary site plans have been made but to date a complete application has not been received. Further, the site plan on file does not reflect the "as built" site that existed before the Volley Ball Court, lighting, reconfigured parking area and elevator construction was started. We would suggest that this application be held open until a site plan application is made. We will then send a copy of the site plan to your Board for review in the context of the overall proposed site plan and lot line change. SUBJECT: DATE: FROM: MEMORANDUM TO FILE Meeting with Mr. Tony Lewandowskio surveyor for Dr. Joseph Lizewski February 3, 1993 Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer On February 3, 1993, the lot line change Conmaons. I met with Mr. Tony Lewandoski to review and site plan for Dr. Lizewski's Village Mr. Lewandowski told me that Dr. Lizewski had asked him to review his maps and plans with me, however he said he didn't know why. Mr Lewandowski then proceeded to show me his plans/maps. I informed Mr. Lewandowski that the lot line and site plan could not be combined on one map/plan as shown. I further told him that the scale of the site plan had to be 1" = 20'. Mr. Lewandowski then asked, "since when was this the standard". I informed him that the 1" = 20'scale had been the standard for at least the four years that I had been working on site plans. I indicated that parking spaces and parking calculations must be shown on the site plan. Mr. Lewandowski said that since the parking spaces were not striped at the property he didn't see why they had to be shown on the site plan. I told him the parking was required. I suggested to Mr. Lewandowski, that in order to expedite the process, he should become familiar with the technical requirements of the lot line change and site plan as contained in the application package. I further informed Mr. Lewandowski that I would be happy to assist him in any areas that he may need assistance or have questions regarding the applications. Memorandum To File FROM: Robert G. DATE: January 8, SUBJECT: Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer 1993 Dr. Joseph Lizewski On the above date Dr. Lizewski came into the Planning Board office and informed me that he had hired Tony Lewendowski, a local surveyor, to prepare his site plan and a lot-line change. I told Dr. Lizewski that I would be happy to meet with Mr. Lewendowski at his convenience to render any possible assistance in the preparation of the plans and maps. Memorandum To File Date: August 31,1992 Subject: Dr. Joseph Lizewski On the above date I spoke with Dr. Lizewski on the telephone as a result of his request for clarification of the Planning Board's letter to him of August 25, 1992. I read the two options that he and Board member Mark McDonald discussed as follows: Option One was for Dr. Lizewski to file an amended site plan for all work now and proposed for the site. This would include the removal of the barn, new parking arrangement, and the second story addition. This would be a full amended site plan with fee and environmental form etc. Option Two would be for Dr. Lizewski to file an amended site plan as above but not show the second story addition. The agreement was to waive site plan for this addition for safety reasons when construction was to start at some future date. Dr. Lizewski indicated he was going to pursue option two and asked if he should show the future proposed second s~tory future addition. I indicated that the Planning Board plied to waive this addition for safety reasons and that he should not show the addition at this time. I further indicated that he should show the racquet ball court and all parking as it exists. I indicated the fee would be $150 and the short environmental form would be required. ~--~ FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. TEMPORARY C.O. Certificate Of Occupancy No. Zl6374 ................. Date November 6 1987 THIS CERTIFIES that the building Recreation Center Location of Property 320 Depot Lane Cutchogue 'dd ....................... 's't/o i ............................ Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section I 02 .Block 02 .Lot. 012. l Subdivision ............................... Filed Map No ......... Lot No .............. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated .... .S.e.p.~.:..17. 1985 pursuant to which Building permit No. 14481Z dated Dec. 24, 1985 ....... '~i ................... was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of tile law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ......... .... K~ c r e.a.r~ i ol~. C. e o I:.e.r The certificate is issued to JOSEPH & JUDIE LIZEWSKI ..................... .................... of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval P e n d i n g UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. P e n d i n g PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED: Temporary C.O. is good only for Subject to State Restrictions. Second floor non-habitable. Zoning Board of Appeals #3322 May Rev. 1/81 Pending the life of the permit. Building Inspector 2, 1985 FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTItOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTtIOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dat~ .....~...--~.~ . .~-'~'.L~._..cj . 19 ~ ~ CountyTax Map No. 1000 Section ..... ~ Bock ~ ]~, J Subdivision ................. Filed Map No. ~ ............... LotNo .................. iS returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds..~.~ . ~. ).~ :~t e ~ ...... ~ - .0. ~ ~ .~..~.. ~... . .- ~;::~..: ......... ~ ~.~ ~ .. Rv 1/80 \ INSPECTORS (516) 765-1802 VICTOR LESSARD, Principal CURTIS HORTON, Senior VINCENT R. WIECZOREK, Ordinance ROBERT FISHER, Assistant Fire Building Inspectors THOMAS FISHER GARY FISH SCOTT L. HARRIS, Supervisor Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION Date: December 23, 1992 TO: Joseph Lizewski 320 Depot Lane Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE there exists a violation of: Zoning Ordinance - CHAP. 100 Other Applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations at premises hereinafter described in that: LIGHTS FOR NIGHT USE FOR RECREATION (EXTERIOR ~ ACCESSORY IN OTHER THAN REAR YARD; NEED FOR AMENDED SITE PLAN. In violation of 100-71 C (1)~ 100-31 C 6 (b), 100-33, 100-250 YOU ARE THEREFORE DIRECTED AND ORDERED TO comply with the law and remedy the conditions above mentioned IMMEDIATELY The premises to which this ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION refers are situated at:29325 MAIN RD & 320 DEPOT LA. CUTCHOGUE, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, NEW YORK SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 1000-102-2-12.1 Failure to remedy the conditions aforesaid and to comply with the applicable provisions of law may constitute an offense punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. Principal Building Inspector encl. (Cert. Mail) Couthwld ?~;~n H~,ll ~.0. w~x zl~ Southold, New York 11971 Dear Board of Appeals, We are asking that the Board deny Joseph and Judie Lizewski's request for a variance to install volleyball courts and outdoor lighting at the Health Club adjacent to our property on Depot Lane. In recent years our peace and quiet has been disturbed on many spring and summer nights by loud' noises and music emanating from exercise classes at the Club. We have been very tolerant of this annoyance in the past. Now with the prospect of nightly boisterous volleyball games being played under glarinq lights not 200 feet from our bedroom and living room windows our patience has run out. We hope that the Board will not forget that this area is also residential and as such those of us that live here have a right to expect the peace and tranquility that was inherently promised years ago when we purchased our homes prior to the Health Club's presence. We urge you to carefully consider the negative effects this variance will have on those of us living in close proximity to these courts. Thank you ~or your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely~ ", ~i) Amy L. Albrecht David H. Albrecht 95 Depot Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Richard C. Wilton Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 5, 1993 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Dr. Joseph Lizewski, D.D.S. Depot Enterprises, Inc. 29205 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Appl. No. 4157 - Proposed Volley Ball Courts Dear Dr. Lizewski: This will confirm that the hearing on your variance request will be reconvened on Tuesday, April 27, 1993. A copy of the Legal Notice (as advertised in the L.I. Traveler-Watchman, Inc.) will be forwarded to you with the scheduled time in a few days. Once the maps have been prepared delineating the type and location of screening in this yard area east of Depot Lane, as well as the setback distances and location of the volley ball courts and proposed lighting, please submit six (6) prints to our office. Please provide as much information as possible showing the height of the proposed screening, and other accessory structures or accessory building(s) on the property. Very truly yours, · ~. ~.~>~ I ~./-~:~ -.,~/~ GERARD P. GOEHRINGER~ CHAIRMAN Cutchogue, NewYork 11935 ~34-5815 b p ~0 ¢¢-¢ O .,, ¢..,o' ~ -i- ,,. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-22227 Date MARCH 29r 1993 THIS CERTIFIES that the buildinq ADDITION Location of Property 320 DEPOT LANE / 29325 MAIN ROAD, House No. Street County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 102 Block 2 Subdivision Filed Map No. CUTCHOGUE ~ NY H~mlet Lot 12.1 Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated DECEMBER 17, 1992 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 21162-Z dated DECEMBER 21, 1992 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is INDOOR PUBLIC POOL & TWo (2} BATHROOMS IN HEALTH CLUB AS APPLIED FOR. ..~. The certificate is issued to DEPOT ENTERPRISESr INC. '~';" (owner) ~.~.~¢~ Qf the aforesaid building. : ~:'~:':" SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL APPROVED OCTOBER 16r 1987 UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N 117972 MARCH 12~ 1990 pLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED OCTOBER 27~ 1992 Rev.,I/81 Building 'InSpeCtor- ' TOWN OWNER ~IECORD/C~RD OF SOUTHOLD PROPERT~ ~ VILLAGE ~ DIST./ CB. MISC. Mkt. Value _.J-./O 0 -~/ oo Acre NEW FARM 'illa~e ~ ¢oodland !G COND !LOW Value Per Value 'oral ~ ~ ACR. I,~3o I SUB. LOT ', TYPE OF BUILDING FRONTAGE ON WATER I/ FRONTAG~ ON ROAD "J~O' '''~' ~'~" -~'- /~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ouO DEPTH DOCK i FEB- 9 1993 TO'¢::~,., .;';' ' ~ '' ' Approved .. ............... 19..., Pe~it No ............ (Building Inspector) BOARD 0F HEAl. TH FORM NO. 1 3 SETS OF ?LANS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SURV£Y BUILDING DEPARTMENT CIIECK TOWN HALL SEPTIC FOR,'! SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL.: 765-1802 NOTIMY: CALL ................... HAlL TO: Date .............. 19.. INSTRUCTIONS a. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector, with 3 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. ,. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and giving a detailed description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this appli- cation. I / ¢. The work covered by this application may not be col~menced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Insp¢.ctor will issued a Building Permit to the applicant. Such permit shall be kept on the premises ar.affable for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy shall have been granted by the Building Inspector. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Buitdiug Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housin~ code, and regulations, and ~to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary insp~ ~...~..'. , -- (Sign~/t/a~ant~/or name, if a cor~ra_tion) grate whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder. Name of owner ofpr~mises ............... " ' ............ ~, ~ , (as on tt~e' ) ...... If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer. ~ ,' (Name and title of corporate officer) Builder's License No .......................... Plumber's License No ......................... Electrician's License No ....................... Other Trade's License No ...................... · ...,H~ouse Num. ber Street County Tax Map No. 1000 Section .... /..0...Tw'. ....... Block ...~.. 0 '~ Lot i2, 1 Subdivision ...................................... Filed Map No ..... ; ......... Lot ............... (Name) State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy . '. . -')'-t~'- .... ~ .......... ' b. Intended use and occupancy .... ii'. ..... ~I:::~i ~~ .... 3. Nature of work [check which applicable): New Building Addition .......... Alteration .. Repair .............. Removal .............. Demolition .............. Other Work ......... ''" 4. Estimated Cost .... .: .O. ?..... (Description)' 5. If dwelling, number of dwellin- u :'- ' (to be paid on filing this applicatio If garage, number of cars ........... Number of dwelling units on each fl 6. If business, Commercial or mixed occupan;;~: ;:;c'i~ ": ...................................... existing structures, v y narure and extent of each type of use ............. ' . '. 7. Dimensions of if any: Front .... Height · Num' -- ' ~ · · · Rear . · · . Depth .............. oer ot Stories ...... ! ....... , ......... ; .... ............. .. Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additlOns:?ront ' ' ...... ~ear ............. J .... 82 Dimensions of entire new construction: Front .................. Number of Stories... ~.... ,' ~' ' ' ~ ' Height ............... Number of Stories ............... Rear ............... Depth . .'. 'f .... 9, Size of lot: Front ....... ' .... I0. Date of Purchase ............... Rear .... . ..... Depth ......... Zone or use district in which premises are situated ...................................... 12, Does prop ............................. Name of Former Owner ............................. osed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation: .......... · .................... 13. Will lot be regraded ........ ~ ................... Will e:'cess fill be removed ['rom premises- Yes 14. Name of Owner of premises .................. '.. Address .......... Phone No. ' Name of Architect ............ . ............... Address · No. Name of Contractor .......................... · a. ddress J i ........... Phone No ' 15. Is this property within 300 feet of a tid~¥ we '~ ..... , ......... Phone No . . · If yes, Southoid Town Tru~t~- -, · tland. *Yes; ....... No ........ " . - .... ~ rermlt may be required. ' ........ PLOT DIAGRAM Locate clearly and distinctly all buildings, whether existing or proposed, and, indicate all set-back dim ~nsions from property lines. Give street and block number or description accorCing to deed, and show street names and indicate whether inte_.fior or comer lot. rATE OF NEW YORK, ?2-~-L?~, '-'f;; Li ,~. , -)UNTy OF .......... S.S ~ ,"Z, " ................................ being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract) ore named. is the ....... ' - ~ (Contractor, agent, corporate officer,'etc.) · · said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this ,licalion; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that th',~ rk will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. ~m to before me this · , ' ; , - ........... ·County ANN M. SOITO Notary Public, State of New Yo~, No. 4926547 . ', O~allfied in S~ffolk Couf~ff. C~m~mi~sion Expire~ June Si na u (; .... :;';; ;applic;;,i SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: COMMENTS: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 25, 1992 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed site plan for Village Commons Health & Racquet Club Depot Lane, Cutchogue Zoning District: Residential Office (RO) SCTM#1000-102-2-12.1 & 11 Dear Dr. Lizewski: The Planning Board has not received the amended site plan for the above referenced property as per our previous discussions. If you need assistance, or require further information, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector ~emorandu3n To File Date: August 20,1992 Subject: Dr. Joseph Lizewski On the above date I reviewed with Mark McDonald the options Mark presented to Dr. Lizewski regarding his health club site plan. Option One was for Dr. Lizewski to file an amended site plan for all work now and proposed for the site. This would include the removal of the barn, new parking arrangement, and the second story addition. This would be a full amended site plan with fee and environmental form etc. Option Two would be for Dr. Liewski to file an amended site plan as above but not show the second story addition. The agreement was to waive site plan for this addition for safety reasons when construction was to start at some future date. ~emorandum To File Date May 8, 1992 Subject Dr. Joseph Lizewski Upon the instructions of Board member Mark McDonald I called Dr. Lizewski on this date to see what his decision was as to the options presented to him by Mr. McDonald. Dr. Lizewski informed me that he plans to present a complete site plan to the Board and request a waiver for the new addition. I informed Messrs. McDonald and Orlowski of his decision. i IIbAGE " & Racquet Club ( 516 ) 734-7007 32{} Depot lane, Cutchoguc, N.Y. 11935 To the Attention of: The Planning Board. May 1, 1992 I am presently goin~ to add fifteen (15) parking places at the Village Commons Health and Racquet Club. Over the next month, I will be taking do%~ the 30' X 60' barn to accomDdate the additional par]zing area. My Building Department has informed me that in order to receive a building permit to add 2~0 s~uare feet to the second story of my existing buildin§, a site plan approval is required. The 240' is being added because the original design of the second story was never meant to hold the machinery I need for my business. I have had to reinforce with steel girders, areas of the floor which now hold somo of this equipment. ~e 240 square foot addition ~ill be special construction designe~ to hold tremendous weight and handle the deflection necessary, qT.~e 240 square feet is less than 4% of my total building and will not add to the use by more people. It will just allow for the relocation of present equipment to an area to support it pro- perly. Since the impact of the 2~0 s~cuare feet doesn't change the use of the building, or impact ~le volume of people in the club, I would like an exemption from a site plan review, By adding 15 parking places, I am sure I will ~ceed the parking expec- tations of what a 2~0 square foot second floor addition woul~ demand. Thank you for your ccnsideration in this matter. Very truly yours, J~L/cg Memorandum To File Date May 8, 1992 Subject Dr. Joseph Lizewski Upon the instructions of Board member Mark McDonald I called Dr. Lizewski on this date to see what his decision was as to the options presented to him by Mr. McDonald. Dr. Lizewski informed me that he plans to present a complete site plan to the Board and request a waiver for the new addition. I informed Messrs. McDonald and Orlowski of his decision. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latharn. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765- 1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'UI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516t 765-1823 April 20, 1992 Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed site plan for Dr. Joseph Lizewski Depot Lane, Cutchogue Zoning District: Residential Office (RO) SCTM91000-102-2-12.1 & 11 Dear Dr. Lizewski: The Planning Board has received your request for additional parking in the northwest corner of your property, and elevation drawings dated February 22, 1992 for a second story addition. The Board will require an amended site plan for the second story addition. However, in the meantime, you can proceed with the removal of the six parking spaces and curbing in the north west corner of the property, and with the rough grading of the adjoining area for new parking. The Board suggests that you not install the drainage rings and the final paving until the barn is removed. Please show all parking requirements on the amended site plan. It is suggested that you remove the proposed parking shown on the site plan by the east of the existing buildings along the east property line, as there is insufficient back up space in this area. Also, the new lot in the northwest corner together with the other parking on site should be sufficient for the entire site. If you have any questions, or require further assistance please contact staff member Robert Kassner at this office. cc: Victor Lessard, Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Principal building Inspector me ]'Own Code about I~ghts or volley- Asked if he, as a member of the Town Board, intends to propose legislation to correct the seeming oversight, Dr. Lizewski dhook his head. "There's no point, really, because you gel so few of these applications," he said. "It's just an -~,~*w~t s contention that a volleyball court and/or exterior lights must be erected and a violation issued before permission for their installation is granted. "You've got to be kidding," the former planning chief said. "Anybody else would be stopped until they con- form. This is like phenomenal that you get into office and get all this power." APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Goehringer, ZBA Chairman ~ Jerry March 31, 1992 PB Inquiry Property ID #1000-102-2-12.1 As you may know, Mark McDonald has assisted in clarifying your memorandum by addressing specific areas regarding the uses established at the above-referenced premises under the site plan application before the Planning Board and its relationship to the Special Exception granted in 1985 for a membership club. The uses at the site, (such as the swimmingpool, recreation courts, and the like) are permitted accessory uses and will not require a Special Exception since these uses are accessory and related to the principal use for a recreational club granted in 1985. The second concern may have been the business office uses at the site. You should note that the office use was in existence as conforming uses in the B-Light Business Zone, and permitted uses in the appropriate zone districts did not require further ZBA application. We hope that this will assist you concerning your questions for "allowable uses" under the 1985 Special Exception and prior zoning code regulations. IKANNING BOAR TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman March 17, 1992 Site plan for Dr. Joseph Lizewski SCTM9 1000-102-2-12.1 Appeals Senior Building Inspector Curtis Horton was contacted by Dr. Joseph Lizewski for a Certificate of Occupancy for his building. As per departmental policy, Mr. Horton asked the Planning Board to review their files and the approved site plan to ensure that the existing uses/buildings are in compliance with the July 19, 1985 approved site plan. The Planning Department has reviewed your decision of May 2, 1985. The Board would like to know if the present uses conform to your decision. cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Curtis Horton, Senior Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kennelh L. Edwards Telephone 1516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ~/~} March 17, 1992 Site plan for Dr. Joseph Lizewski SCTM9 1000-102-2-12.1 Senior Building Inspector Curtis Horton was contacted by Dr. Joseph Lizewski for a Certificate of Occupancy for his building. As per departmental policy, Mr. Horton asked the Planning Board to review their files and the approved site plan to ensure that the existing uses/buildings are in compliance with the July 19, 1985 approved site plan. The Planning Department has reviewed your decision of May 2, 1985. The Board would like to know if the present uses conform to your decision. cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Curtis Horton, Senior Building Inspector JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 October 25, 1985 To: F rom: Re: Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Waivers granted by Town Board on October 22, 1985 Attached hereto are the following waivers of the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 which were granted by the Southold Town Board at their October 22, 1985 regular meeting: Ruth Enterprises ser and Marilyn Gatz h Lizewski 125-127 Main Street Corp. Alfred M. Citelli, Jr., DDS & Vincent M. Robert A. Celic Claps, DDS Also attached is the resolution denying a waiver to "280 North Road", and a letter to Dynasty Packing Inc. relative to the Board's inaction on their waiver request. Attachments JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 1985: WHEREAS, Joseph Clifford Gornell, on behalf of Ruth Enterprises, I~s requested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 with respect to his application presently pending before the Planning Board and the Building Inspector, and WHEREAS, Joseph Clifford Cornell appeared before this Board and explained the, nature of the uses for which he proposes to use the premises in question, and WHEREAS, this Board finds that the applicant proposes to construct a new build- ing to house three business offices, and WHEREAS, this Board deems such use consistent with the uses in a Limited Business District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine & Weiner, Inc.'s Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant be and he hereby is granted a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 to the extent of permitting such uses on said premises as set forth in his application presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board for a site plan and the Southold Town Building Inspectoi for a building permit, subject, however, to the applicant obtaining any and all permits and approvals required by all Town and other governmental agencies having jurisdictior thereof. o--,-Judith T. Terry~ ~ ' Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa, P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 1985: WHEREAS, Garrett A. Strang, on behalf of Walter and Marilyn Gatz,has requested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 with respect to his application presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board and Southold Town Building Inspector, and ~ ~ WHEREAS, Garrett A. Strang appeared before this Board and explained the natu~'e of the uses for which he proposes to use the premises in question, and WHEREAS, this Board finds that the applicant proposes to construct a restaurant and business offices, and WHEREAS, this Board deems such use consistent with the uses in a Limited Business District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine & Weiner, Inc.'s Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant be and he hereby is granted a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 to the extent of permitting only that which is allowed in the Limited Business District on said premises as set forth in his application presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board for site plan approval and Southold Town Building Inspector for a building permit, subject, however, to the applicant obtaining any and all permits and approvals required by all Town and other governmental agencies having jurisdiction thereof. ~it~ ~. Terry Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 1985: WHEREAS, Garrett A. Strang, on behalf of Joseph Lizewski, has req~uested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 with respect to his application presently pending before the Building Inspector, and WHEREAS, Garrett A. Strang appeared before this Board and explained the nature of the uses for which he proposes to use the premises in question, and '-~ WHEREAS, this Board funds that the applicant proposes to construction a racquet- ball facility, and WHEREAS, this Board deems such use consistent with the uses in the R-40 District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine & Weiner, Inc.'s Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant be and he hereby is granted a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 to the extent of permitting such uses on said premises as set forth in his application presently pending before the Southold Town Building Inspector for a building permit, subject, however, to the applicant obtaining any and all permits and approvals required by all Town and other governmental agencies having jurisdiction thereof. Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 1985: WHEREAS, Garrett A. Strang, on behalf of 125-127 Main Street Corp., has requested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 with respect to his application presently pending before the Building Inspector, and WHEREAS, Garrett A. Strang appeared before this Board and explained the na,tu, re of the uses for which he proposes to use the premises in question, and WHEREAS, this Board finds that the applicant proposes to constructing a warehouse building with an office, and WHEREAS, this Board deems such use consistent with the uses in a Light Industrial District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine & Weiner, Inc.'s Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicasnt be and he hereby is granted a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 to the extent of permitting such uses on said premises as set forth in his application presently pending before the Southold Town Building Inspector for a building permit, subject, however, to the applicant obtaining any and all permits and approvals required by all Town and other governmental agencies having jurisidiction thereof. udith T. Terry /~' Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OE VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 1985: WHEREAS, Alfred M. Citelli, Jr., D.D.S. and Vincent M. Claps, D.D.S. have requested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 with respect to their application presently pending before the Southold Town Planning. Board for~ Site plan approval, and WHEREAS, this Board finds that the applicant proposes to construct professional office buildings, and WHEREAS, this Board deems such use conssitent with the uses in a Light Business District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine & Weiner, Inc.'s Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicants be and they hereby are granted a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 to the extent of permitting such uses on said premises as set forth in their application presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board for site plan approval, subject, however, to the applicant obtaining any and all permits and approvals required by all Town and other governmental agencies having jurisdiction thereof. Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF ¥~TAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa, P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 1985: WHEREAS, Robert A. Celic has requested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 with respect to his application pending before the Southold Town Planning Board and Southold Town Building Inspector, and WHEREAS, this Board finds that the applicant proposes to construction an extension to his real estate office building, and ~ ~ WHEREAS, this Board deems such use consistent with the uses in a B-1 District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine & Weiner, Inc.'s Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant be and he hereby is granted a waiver of the provisions of Local Law NO. 14 - 1985 to the extent of permitting such uses on said premises as set forth in his application presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board for site plan approval and the Southold Town Building Inspector for a building permit, subject, however, to the applicant obtaining any and all permits and approvals required by all Town and other governmental agencies having jurisdiction thereof. · Terry ky Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 1985: WHEREAS, John C. Tsunis, Esq., on behalf of "280 North Road", has requested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law NO. 14 - 1985 with respect to his applica- tion presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board, and WHEREAS, this Board finds that the applicant proposes to construct a retail sl~o~)ping center, and WHEREAS, this Board deems such us inconsistent with the uses in the R-O District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine & Weiner, Inc.'s Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant be and he hereby is denied a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 with respect to his application presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board for site plan approval. -'Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa, P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 October 25, 1985 Capt. John M. Dulemba, Pres. ¢ C.E.O. Dynasty Packing Inc. Box 699 Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Dulemba: The Southold Town Board at their regular meeting held on October 22, 1985 failed to take action on your application for a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 in light of the fact you made no application to any Town agency prior to the enactment of Local Law No. 14- 1985. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry $outhold Town Clerk Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 18, 1985 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Joseph Lizewski Request for Waiver Dear Mrs. Terry: As per your request, enclosed is from the Planning Board file for the plan. a copy of all the data above mentioned site Also, enclosed is a.copy of the survey endorsed by the Chairman. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,~ SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD enc. By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($16) 765-1801 October 17, 1985 To: From: R~: Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Departm~ Judith T. Terry, Town Cle~l;~( Requests for Waivers: ~foseph Lizewski 125-127 Main Street Corp. Please submit all pertinent data in your files pertaining to the following waiver requests: Garrett A. Strang, on behalf of Joseph Lizewski, proposed racquetball faCilities, Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue. Garrett A. Strang, on behalf of 125-127 Main Street Corp., premises at 645 Ninth Street, Greenport. Attachments (2) GARRETT A. STRANG ARCHITECT October 14, 1985 HAIN ROAD, P. O. BOX 141,~ SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11{371 Supervisor Frank Murphy and Members of the Town Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Racquetball Facilities, Joesph Lizewski, Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue, New York Dear Supervisor Murphy and Members of the Board: The Building Department has advised me that they will take no further action on the above matter, because of the present moratorium. Please be advised that the above application received Planning Board approval on June 24, 1985 and that to the best of my know- ledge, is in keeping with the proposed master plan. I respectfully request a waiver of the moratorium and ask that the Board notify other Town departments of same. Thank.you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, GAS/b Garrett A. Strang, R.A. cc: J. ~izewski GARRETT A. STRANG ARCHITECT October 14, 1985 MAIN ROAD. P, O. BOX 141~ $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Supervisor Frank Murphy and Members of the Town Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York -11971 Re: Premises, 645 Ninth Street, Greenport, New York Dear Supervisor Murphy and Members of the Board: The Building Department has advised me that they will take no further action on the above matter, because of the present moratorium. Please be advised that application for Building Permit was made on September 23, 1985, for an addition to an existing business use, for which it is my understanding, no Planning Board approval was necessary and to the best of my knowledge, is totally in keeping with the proposed master plan. I respectfully request a waiver of the moratorium on behalf of my client, 125-127 Main Street Corp., and ask that you notify other Town departments of same. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, GAS/b G~,' R.A. T LD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 August 7, 1985 Dr. Joseph Lizewski Main Road Cutchogu~ NY 11935 Re: Site plan for racquet ball courts Dear Dr. Lizewski: Enclosed is a survey for the above mentioned approved site which has been endorsed by the Chairman. Please keep it for your records. enc. plan ry trulY yours, ~ TT OR~OWSKI, JR., ~/~0 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. $chultze, Secretary GARRETTA. STRANG ARCHITECT Ui,t 2 4 198.5 MAIN ROAD. P.O. BOX 1412 SOUTHOLD. NEW YORK 11971 June 2t, 1985 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Racquetball Facility, Main Road and Depot Lane, Cutchogue, New York Dear Mr. Orlowski and Members of the Board: I have been retained by Dr. Lizewski to work with him on the above referenced facility. He has advised me that it is the position ot the Board that the driveway shown on the site plan accessing New York State Route 25 (Main Road) be closed. I would like to ask the Board to reconsider this condition, inasmuch as we would like to retain it for emergency vehicle use only. Dr. Lizewski would be agreeable to placement of s~nage reflecting this condition. I would appreciate your looking favorably on this request at your meeting of Monday, June 24, 1985, at which time you will be making final approval of the site plan. Thank you for your courtesy and coopertion. Very truly yours, GAS/b ,Gar~t~ A. Strang, R.A. cc: Dr. Lizewski TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFI£ E OF BUILDING INSPECTOR P.O. BOX 728 TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL. 765-1802 June 3,1985 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Rd. Southold, N.Y. 11971 Subject: Dr. Joseph Lizewski Racquet Ball Courts Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 Gentlemen: The subject premises is located in a 'B' Light Business Zone district. The proposed use is permitted for this zone by special ex- ception by the Zoning Board of Appeals. (Art. VI Sec. 100-60 B (1)(2)) A special exception was granted under Appeal # 3322 dated May 2,1985, in view of this, this site plan qualifies for certifi- cation in meeting zoning regulations. EH:dsm Yours Truly, Building Inspector TOWN OF SOUTItOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR P.O. BOX 728 TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL. 765-1802 JUN 3 June 3,1985 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Rd. Southold, N.Y. 11971 Subject: Dr. Joseph Lizewski Racquet Ball Courts Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 Gentlemen: The subject premises is located in a 'B' Light Business Zone district. The proposed use is permitted for this zone by special ex- ception by the Zoning Board of Appeals. (Art. VI Sec. 100-60 B (1) (2)) A special exception was granted under Appeal # 3322 dated May 2,1985, in view of this, this site plan qualifies for certifi- cation in meeting zoning regulations. EH:dsm You_rs Truly, Building Inspector t l? 985 Southo d Town Board of Appeals ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No.3350 Application Dated March 26, ]985 Dr. Joseph J. Lizewski, D.D.S. Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 [Appellant (s) ] At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on May 2, ]985, the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [X] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section ]00-30(8)[6] ' [ ] Request for Application of JOSEPH LIZEWSKI, 29205 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30(B)[6] for permission to construct building for private membership with an insufficient setback from the easterly property line. Location of Property: North Side of Main Road and East Side of Depot Lane, Cut- chogue, NY;. County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-102-02-12.1. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on April ll, concerning the Matter of the Application of JOSEPH LIZEWSKI under Appeal No. 3350, and 1985 WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar witht he premises in question as well_as its surrounding area, and WHEREAS, the board has considered all testimony and documentation entered into the record concerning this application, and WHEREAS, there has been no oPposition entered in the record up until the conclusion of the public hearing, and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1. The property in Zoning District pursuant Tow Board March 9, 1982. question is located to a change of zone in a "B-Light Business" granted by the Southold 2. The property in question fronts along the north side of the Main Road (State Route 25) 147.39 (and 116.37) feet and is also situate with frontage along the east side of Depot Lane 173.13 feet (and 233.7 feet), and is shown to contain an area of approximately 1.5 acres and approximately 20,000± sq. ft. including the one-family dwelling and lot at the corner of Depot Lane and Main Road, also owned by the applicant. 3. The subject premises is improved as shown on the site plan dated April 6, 1984, for one-famill residence and professional office (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) DATED: May 17, 1985. Form ZB4 (rev. i2/81) CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN OF APPEALS ZONING BOARD Page 2 - Appeal No. 3350 Matter of JOSEPH LIZEWSKI Decision R~ndered May 2, 1985 uses. 4. By this application, applicant proposes to construct a 44' by 66' recreation building addition for a private racquetball membership club with a setback at its closest point from the east side line at 32 feet, which is 8 feet closer than the estab- lished sideyard setback of the existing principal structure. 5. Article III, Section 100-30(B)[6] permits annual membership clubs catering exclusively to members and their guests subject to the following requirements: (a) No building or part thereof or any parking or loading area shall be located within one hundred (100) feet of any street line nor within fifty (50) feet of any lot line ... , 6. It is the opinion of the board that the easterly sideyard has been established at 40 feet and the setback as proposed at 32 feet could be allowed for this addition if the special exception use for a racquetball club were not required by Section 100-30(B)[6], that the relief requested is minimal and is in harmony with the intent of the zoning ordinance. In considering this application, the board has determined that the relief as requested be granted since: (a) the relief is not substantial; (b) the relief will not be detrimental to adjoining properties; (c) the relief will not adversely affect the character of the district; (d) the practical difficulties are sufficient to warrant approval hereof; (e) the circumstances are unique since the property has residential structures existing as a nonc~?rming use since prior to the change of zoning from "A" to "B-Lig ; (f) in view of the manner in which the difficulties arose, the interests of justice will best be served by allowing same, as noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr Goehringer seconded by Mr. Sawicki it was ' , , RESOLVED, that the relief requested under Appeal No. 3350 in the Matter of the Application of JOSEPH LIZEWSKI for an insufficient setback from the easterly sideyard at 32 f~-6-~--~-6-r a proposed recreational club addition, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: Modification of the Site Plan by the Planning Board to include a minimum of 27 parking spaces (inclusive of handicapped parking). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution of all the members. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, was adopted by unanimous vote lk ~RARD P. G-6EHRfNG~, C~/~IRMAN May 17, 1985 D LD ¥ Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 4 , 1985 Joseph J. Lizewski, Main Road Cutchogue, NY .~1935 D.D.S. Re: Site plan for recreation building Dear Dr. Lizewski: Please let this confirm the action taken by the Board, Monday, April 1, 1985. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board is in favor of the site plan for Dr. Lizewski for two racquetball courts located at Cutchogue with the following recommendations: 1. Indicate the type of curbing and drainage for roof and parking area, as well as the capacity of the drainage basins. 2. The Board also requested a landscape plan for the site and and architectural rendering of the proposed building. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. V~ry truly yours., ·` /~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., ChaIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc: Zoning Board of Appeals ~LD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 May 21, 1985 Dr. Joseph Lizewski Main Road Cutchogue, NYl1935 Re: Site Plan for Racquet ball Courts Dear Dr. Lizewski: Please let this confirm the action taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, May 20, 1985. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the site~plan of Dr. Joseph Lizewski for the construction of two racquet ball courts to the building department for certification. Map dated April 6, 1984, property,located at Cutchogue. Would you please forward three (3) surveys of the site plan eliminating the existing driveway connecting to the parking area. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to con~act our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc: Building Department Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD-STATE ROAD 25 S0UTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 119'71 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 Appeal No. 3322 Application Dated January 8, 1985 TO: Dr. Ju~uph J. kizewski, D.D.S. Main Road Cutch0gue, NY ]]935 [Appellant(s)] At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on May 2, ]985, the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [×] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section ]00-30(8)[6] [ ] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [ ] Request for Application of JOSEPH LIZEWSKI, 29205 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY for a Special Exception to ~rdinance, Article III, Section 100-30- (b)[6] and Article VI, Section lO0-60(B)[1](a) for permission to establish recreational use (private racquetball membership club) at premises located on the north side of Main Road and east side of Depot Lane, Cutchogue, NY; District 1000, Section 102, Block 02, Lot 12.1. (B-Light Business Zone) WHEREAS, a public hearing was held initially March 7, 1985 and was concluded on April 11, 1985 concerning the Matter of JOSEPH LIZEWSKi under Appeal No~ 3322, and WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the subject premises as well as its surrounding area, and WHEREAS, the board has considered all testimony and documentation entered into the record in this matter, and WHEREAS, there has been no opposition entered in the record up until the conclusion of the public hearing, and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1. The property in question is located in a "B-Light Business" Zoning District pursuant to a change of zone granted by the Southold Tow Board March 9, 1982. 2. The property in question fronts along the north side of the Main Road (State Route 25) 147.39 (and 116.37) feet and is also situate with frontage along the east side of Depot Lane 173.13 feet (and 233.7 feet), and is shown to contain an area of approximately 1.5 acres and approximately 20,000± sq. ft. including the one-family dwelling and lot at the corner of Depot Lane and Main Road, also owned by the applicant. 3. The subject premises is improved as shown on the site plan dated April 6, 1984, for one-family residence and professional office uses. 4. This is an application for a Special applicant proposes to construct a 44' for use as a private DATED: May 17, 1985. Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) Exception by which by 66' recreational addition racquetball membership club with a setback at (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Page 2 - Application No. 3322 Matter of JOSEPH LIZEWSKI (Special Decision Rendered May 2, 1985 Exception) 32 feet from the easterly side property line. 5. Article III, Section 100-30(B)[6] permits annual membership clubs catering exclusively to members and their guests after receiv- ing a special exception from this board and site plan approval from the Planning Board in accordance with Section 100-134 of the Code. 6. For the record it is noted that conditional approval has been made simultaneously herewith to grant an insufficient sideyard setback from the easterly property line at 32 feet under Appeal No. 3350. In considering this application, the board determines: (1) the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts; (2) that the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and order of the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location; (3) the use is in harmony with and will promote the general purposes and intent of zoning since it is a permitted use. In passing upon this application, the board has also considered items (a) through (1) of Article XII, Section 100-121(C)[2] of the Zoning Code. Accordingly, on motion by Mr~ Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was RESOLVED, that a Special Exception as requested under Appeal No~ 3322 in the Matter of the Application of JOSEPH LIZEWSKI at premises known and identified on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 102, Block 02, Lot 12.1, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: Modification of the Site Plan by the Planning Board to include a minimum of 27 parking spaces (inclusive of handicapped parking). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of all the members. lk ~'~R~D F?-~TOE~IR~NGER,-C~'IRrMAN May 17, 1985 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J, DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWlCKi Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 119'71 TO: Southold Town Planning Board FROM: Jerry Goehringer, Z.B.A. Chairman DATE: January 16, 1985 SUBJECT: Special Exception Application of Joseph Lizewski Location of Property: N/S Main Road, Cutchogue TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 Dr. Lizewski has filed an application for a special exception for permission to construct a 44.6' by 55.3' recreational building at his premises located at the easterly side of Depot Lane and the northerly side of Main Road, Cutchogue. The applicant has been requested to file an application with you for site plan approval as required by Article VI, Section lO0-60(B) in order that we may coordinate review with you. When you have received same, may we have your comments or suggestions? Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD-STATE RDAD 25 GOUTHDLD, L,I., N,Y. 11¢J71 1ELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRiGONI$, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI January 16, 1985 Joseph J. Lizewski, D.D.S. RR #2, 29205 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Appeal No. 3322 Application for Special Exception Dear DoctOr Lizewski: This letter will confirm that your recent application was reviewed by the Board of Appeals at our January 10, 1985 Regular Meeting. The public hearing on this matter is expected on or about February 28th, following field inspections, and notice of same as published in the newspapers will be forwarded to you as early as possible. In the interim, it is suggested that an application for site plan approval be made with the Planning Board in order that we may coordinate review with their office. If at any time you have questions, please do not hesitate to call our office or that of the Planning Board (765-1937). Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER ~ 0~oww~alski cc: Building Planning Department Board~ Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, l.l., N.Y. 11=J71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI TO: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Planning Board Chairman FROM: Jerry Goehringer, Board of Appeals Chairman DATE: February 8, 1985 SUBJECT: Applications Involving Planning Board We would like to bring you up-to-date and to request your comments or recommendations on each of the following matters recently filed with our office prior to the advertising deadline, if possible. (Once our hearing is concluded, no additional input legally can be accepted for consideration.) Date Filed Matter of Tentative Deadline 2-1-85 Dominick Varano (Subdivision) 3-4-85 1-28-85 Emilia T. Pike (Subdivision) 3-4-85 1-29-85 Briden Machine (Site Plan, etc.) 3-4-85 1-28-85 WW/ & Helen Coster (' " ") 3-4-85 1-9-85 ~oseph Lizewski (Hearing 3-7-85) 1-9-85 Colgate Design (7-11, Cut) (Hearing 3-7-85) 12-4-84 Cutchogue Free Library (Hearings 2-14-85) 2-8-85 Saul Millman (Spec. Exc. & Var) 3-4-85 12-31-84 Bayview Development Corp. 3-4-85 The following matters have received your responses and have arranged to be held for hearings in the immediate future: Thomas Perillo Robert and Aldona Norkus John and Frances DiVello Alice D. Currie Meehan and Leonardi been Hearing 2-14-85) Hearing 3-7-85*) (Hearing 3-7-85*) (Hearing 3-7-85) (Hearing 3-7-85) APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR, ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Southold Town Board of Appeals HAIN ROAD- ~TATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 119'71 TELEPNONE (516) 76§-1809 TO: Office of the Planning Board (Attn: Diane) FROM: Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals (Attn: Linda) DATE: March 18, 1985 SUBJECT: Applications Pending with Z.B.A. and Planning Board To bring you up-to-date and to request your comments or recommenda- tions, the following matters have been filed since our last memorandum to you dated February 8, 1985, and will require action by the Planning Board: Matter of Tentative ZBA Hearin.~ Dominick Varano, by R. Lark April llth as req. Briden Machine March 28th oeiamand Helen Coster by April as req. R. Lark llth ph Lizewski April llth Colgate Design (7-11, Cutch.) W. Esseks May 2 Saba/Kislow/Sujeski May 2 Howard L. Young & Wf. May 2 Sobering by P. Cardinale, Esq. May 2 or 23 Vitale May 23 P. Reinhart, R. Bruer, Esq. May 23 H. Conway, R. Bruer, Esq. May 23 or June 13 Perricone & Cimini, R. Bruer, Esq. June 13 Pindar Winery June 13 or 20 Peconic Vineyards June 13 or 20 Cliffside Assoc./Tetaldi/Tide Mark June 13 or 20 e.m ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART ROJECT any ao=icionai information you believe will )e neeced :o ::zoleca PARTS Z an= 3. -. :: is exoe~ :na~ ::~l'~cion a~ ~e ~F will be depene~.: an info.ac!an cu~!ncl7 avatleble ~nd will hoc ~$:reec; (PL~RS~ CGMPL~T~ ~AC~ QUEll'lOt( * :ndicac3 tl.A. if ncc ]aolic3ole) .. · %. Gener~) ~qaract~r of t_he land: Generally uniform-, slaae ~ ~ener~ily ,~even and ~111n9 ~sen: !and Jse: ~an , [nCus:r!al , Co.ere!al / ~uour~an ,, Agriculture , Otqer Aporoximace ~cr~a~e: P~sencly After C~mpl4cion Presently After Ccmoletion 4. Wh4: IS o...~m.n.n, soil ~y~e(s) an ~roj~: llt~F 6. Approximate ."eroentage of proposed project site with slopes: (]-10% greater ~,. %; 15'- or ia project contigueus~, or contain a building or site listed on the Hation~l Register of Historic Places? Yes ,/ No What ts the depth to the water table? ~- feet ~ hunting or fishing oppo~untties presently exist in the projeot area? Yes Does project site contaf~a~,, species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endanc~red - Yes '~ ~o, acceding to - Identify each species 11. 13. 14. ~re there any unique or unu~j,~al land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations - Yea ~No. (Describe Is the project site pr~t~..sently used by the corot, unity or neighborhood as an open space or'recreation aroa- Yes ~' No. ' Does ~he Pres Site offer or tncIude scenic views or vistas known to be important to .tJ~e c~m~ntty? ' Yes - Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Neme of stream and name of river to which it is tributary · 16. Lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Nam4 A- ~Y-~' ; b. Size (in acres) )that is the dominant lanJ use and zoning classification within single family r~sidential, R-2) and the scale of development {e.g. 2 story}. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor ~ acres. Project acreage developed: - acres tnitially~ acres ultimately. Project acreage to remain undeveloped Length of project, in miles: . <~/'?+ (if aooropriate) If project is an exaansion o? existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: age ; developed acreage f. tl6~er of off-st~t parking spaces existing· j'7~__. ; proposed g. ~axi~ vehicular trips generated per hour . ~ Iupon completion o? project) h. If residential: ~u~,Jer and type o~ housing units: One 'Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium initial building square foot Ultimate OrientJtlon NeighbornaoU-City-~egional Con~ercial /ndustrfal Total height of tallest Proposed structure Estimated Employment Ho~ much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be re~oved from the site - tons ~ ~0~ cubic yar~ How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, g~und covers) will be re~oved from site - O acres. Will any mature forest (o~e~r lO0 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes ~'No Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that re~oved during construction? ~/~es ' 'No If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction ~months, (including demolition). If multi-phasQd project: a. ' ' · ' c, year. d. Yes -- Will blasting occur during constriction? Yes Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ ; after project is complete Nu~er of jobs eliminated by this project ~ . ?eta1 number of phases anticipated .No. Anticipated date of oo~enoe~ent phase 1 month demolition) Approximate completion date final phase ~nth Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent phases? Will project require relocation of ~ny projects or facilities? 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. lg. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~'/Yes .Re. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) ~. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be disobeyed Will surface area of existing lakes, po.T~s, stre~s, bays or other surface waterways be increased or deoreased by proposal? Yes ,/No. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? Yes ~o a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? ~es b. If yes, will an ~xisting solid waste disposal facility be used? Yes // . .' . ....;" ¢, If yes, give name: --- ; location~- d. ~ill any wastes net go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? F Yes Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~es ~.~o Will project routinely produce odors'(~ore than one hour per day)?_.__Yes u~"~o Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local am. bience noise levels? Yes.. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~es No. if yes, indicate type(s) ~ ? If water supply is fro~ ~e]Is indicate pumping capacity To,al anticipated water usage per day ? ~ais/da¥. Zoning: a. Xhac is dominant'toning classification of site) b. Current s~eclFic zoning ¢lzss(fioacion of lite c. Il proposed use consistent with ~resent Zoning? d. If no, indicate desired zoning gels/minute. 26. Approvals: a, Is any Federal per=it required? Yes -~ ~o b. Does pmject involve State or Federal funding or financing? ¢. Lo~a] and Regional approvals: City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning $oard City, Town, ~oning Board ..... City, County Health Departm, ent Other local agencies Other regional agencies - ' State Agencies Federal Agencies IRFO~ATIG~LRL DETAILS Approval Recuired (fas, ;Io) (Type) Submittal Approval (Date) (Date) Attach any additional tnfo~qr~tion.as may be needed to clarify your project. adveme impacts associated with the' ~r~osal, please discuss such impacts and the measures ~hi:n can be taken to ~itiga~ ar avoid~e~. ~ PREPARER'S SIgnATURE: . TITLe: REP~£SE~TI~G: DATE: If there are or may be any ATTORNEY AT LAW 828 FRONT STREET GREENPORT, N.Y.l~944 Phone (516) 477-101§ ~Jerald Ge Bmmln~ Ch~e£ PXanner county of suffoXk DeparUmt of P2~aAng New York 11787 J~plA~a~ion of ~roeeph J. LAsevakA (J280S) Toun of ~ld (SD-eX-13) X aa Ln Feoe%l~ of a ~ of your letter ~o b Sou~bold Toen Zoning Boa.-d o£ Appealo da~od CaMMmber 3, 1981 in re£eronoe ~o ~he fub:~e~ matter vl~Leh waa £orvarded ~o me b~ b Sout~oXd Town SonAng Board of Appealo. without affordLug tho eppolLiut the cq~)rtuntty to ~on£ront Your reasons for WdAwapproval" are ill-ooneeAved and pze:JudAoAaX ~o ~he appXLeant. How ~an your ComaAwmAoa detena~ne whether or no~ W~ae variance oriterAa· a~e m~ ~Ath- ou~ aetmMSAng the varAanoo hearAng where evAdenee As presented? X mu8~ aw~ tha~ Wha~ ~ou ~ is tha~ tho appX%~an~'w pe~Atf~n did not 8how m~u£fAeleat 'unneoewaary hardih.Lp" to 1. It %fm'~r~e excluoAve son~nGr bo&rd o£ appeals to 2. There are eireuutaneem ~n whioh m uae vlrAm~B can be granted v~thout the ehovAng off an eunnecemsarf hardship". (Soe Hat,er o£ Xaw~en, 47 AD 2d 766) Xn £a~ ~he 8ou~l~old Z~Ang Board of Appeals dad £1nd, after ~onaAdering ~be evAdenoe ~aXd 6. Meuaan, Chief' l~l.armer -2- December 11~ 1951 presented a~ hearlnq, ~hat, "...~here te...a publla need type o£ ~a~A11t2 proposed b~ ~he appeXXant in ~he_ Hamlet o£Cutahog~e.' Your me~ond mmo~ for mdimapproval= :Lo even norm l~dAaro~m. %t f. tq~Xlem ~o me thee ~ ~ltomnt Imw d~me mere- thing Improper by appealAng a deelmloa o~ the ~outhold Town ~6U of ~ho Tram Law ~be Ita~e of ~ Yo~k O'ave the Torn Board b pouer (legislative) ~o at. ate a mm~ board of ap~2ealm vAtld~n b ~uu. The Sou~boXd To~n Board ahome ~o exeroAme of~t8 ~m&~u~ve leqLfmXatAve po~or ~o el~abl/mh & IonAng board · appeaAe (Sou~b~Xd Town Code Chapter 100 ~Aale XXX). The Sou~hold Town Booed ~hoee ~o gave ~he Sonlnq Board o£ Appoala the appellan~ prooeeded 1~ aaeordanoe ~Ath the dul~ adopted aoulng ezdtnanoa o~ the Teun o£ ~outhold. ...The preparation and adoption o£ a o0mpre- henmAve doveloimont plan does not alone ineure ~be development of ~he ~eamual~y An aooordan~e wASh ~be plmm ob:Je~Avuo and proposals.... Whenever ~hangl~g oondA~A~m In ~.~ oammuAty ~u~tt£y ~he modl£1oatAon of the plan or the '~.:Legal lnotruu~nto fo~ AmplementAng At, the planning board ohould oon~Ader appropriate moa8ure8 to keep tho~e doeuuont] current and moalLtnqful.... m~a~ad above, ~e~ SonAng Board of Appealm of e~e To~n of did fi~d ~hat ~bare warn a ~XAo ~ for b ~ of ~d ~u ~ ~ ny ~ %o ~e m~n%o ~ lo~al ~onLn9 ordinaries or ~or a~ zm~ng board o~ appeals 9ran~ ar~a o~r urn* varLmm~s m~ ~h~ plan had btam Idopt~do OWNER ER OWh RES. SEAS. LAND /~4~ ..~Ioo NEW FARM Tillable /2,1 TOtMI1 OF $OUTttOLD PROPERTY RECORD~'~RD STREET ? ~; ,...~ ,~ ,,~) VILLAGE ACR.. ' -. W ~[o~f ~-~H~ - . TYPE OF BUILDING VL CB. MISC. Mkt. Value TOTAL DATE REMARKS IMP. -~1 00 ex 0 3/00 /30 o -zl~Dc~ ' IG COND ~RMAL , B[LOW Acre Value Per z ? %-00 SUB. LOT ___~_~0. oo0 500 Swampland Brush/ar{d ~ ' ~ ~ (~ Total Value FRQNTAGE ON WATER FRONTAGE ON ROAD ' ,/J~O'" DEPTH ' · BULKHEAD Chapter 100 From the CODE of the Town of SOUTHOLD GENERAL CODIC PUBLISIIER$ CORP. § 100-30 (5) SOUTIIOLD CODE § 100-39 diseases are defined by the Sanitary Code of the Public Health Council of the State of New York. [4] Eight thousand 18,0001 square feet of lot area shall be provided for each patient bed. Public utility rights-of-~vay as well as structures and other installations necessary to serve areas within the town, subject to such conditions as the Board of Appeals may impose in order to protect and promote .. the health, safety, appearance and general walfare of' the community and the character of the neighborhood in which the proposed structure is to be constructed. (6) Fraternity houses, golf courses and annual mem- bership clubs catering exclusively to members and their guests, or other recreational facilities open to the public, and accessory playgrounds, beaches, swim- ming pools, tennis courts and recreational buildings, subject to the following requirements: (a) No building or part thereof or any parking or loading area shall be located within one hundred (100) feet of any street line nor within fifty (50) feet of any lot line. (b) The total area covered by principal and accessory buildings shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the area of the lot. (c) Such use shall not be conducted for profit as a business ~nterprise. {d) No such use shall occupy a lot with an area of less than three (3) acres. .' (e) The direct source of all exterior lighting shall be shielded from the view of surrounding residential lots. (7) Children's recreation camps organized primarily for seasonal use, subject to the following requirements: (a) No building, tent, activity area or recreation facility shall be less than two hundred (200} feet 10022 § 100-30 ZONING from any lot line, and any s area or recreation facility sl therefrom ss required Buildings intended for use be not less than thirty 130) ! tents, which shall be not [Amended 7-31-73] (b) The minimum lot area thousand (10,000) squ tent or other principal three thousand {3,000) shall be provided for e~ in the buildings or tei (c) Ail outdoor lighting shielded to eliminate t nearby residential lots facilities. (d) The sound level of all systems shall not excee~ a residential neighborh (8) Labor camps, farm and following requirements: (a) All farm labor camps structed in conformance shall not be located near than the residence of t specific review and ap Appeals. (9) Boat docking facilities for , accommodation of noncom~ the following requirementsd (a) ThereshalI be docking o~ more than two (2) boats and used by the owner personal use. [Amended 10023 SOUTHOLD CODE : § 100-52. Building length and separation. § 100-60 A. No building shall exceed one hundred twenty-five (125) feet in leng~ h. B. The minimum distance between principal buildings shall be equal to two (2) times the height of the highest building, ~nd the minimum distance between a principal and an accessory building shaJl be twenty (20) feet. C. Any inner court shall have a minimum dimension of sixty [60) feet, and any outer court shall have a rainimura dimension of twenty (20) feet and its depth shall not exceed its width. § 100-53· Livable floor area. [Added 5-30-75 by L.L. No. 3-1975] Each dwelling unit in a multiple dwelling in the M-1 General Multiple-Residence District shall have a livable floor area of not less than eight hundred fifty (850) square feet, except that a one. bedroom or studio dwelling unit shall have a livable floor area of. not less than six hundred (600) Square feet. ARTICLE VI B Light Business District § 100-60. Use reguiatiooe. In a B District, no building or premises shall be used, and no building or part of a building shall be erected or altered wiaic~, arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part. any uses except the following: A. Permitted uses, subject to site plan approval by ,,'.i., Planning Board in accordance with Article XII! [Amended I0-26-76 by L.L. No. 5-1976; 2-1-83 by L.L. 2-1983] (1) Any permitted Uses set forth in, and as regulated the following provisions of this chapter: [a) Subsection A(21 and (3) of § 100-30. (b) Subsection A(31 of § 100-40. 10032 100-60 ZONING (2) Business, professional and (3) Banks and financial institu (4) Retail stores. [5) Restaurants. (6) Bakeshops (for on-premises (7) Laundromats and similar es (8) Personal service stores and (9) Marinas for the docking, moo of noncommercial boats, inclu oil primarily for the use of B. Uses permitted by special exce~ Appeals. The following uses are exception by the Board of A~ provided, subject to site plan apl; Board in accordance with Article (1) [Amended 10-26-76 by L.L. N exception use set forth in, an, folJowing provisions of this c} (a) Subsection B[2) to (13), : (b) Subsection B(2), (4) and ( C. Accessory Uses. [Amended 5-30-75 b 26-76 by L.L. No. 5-1976] (1) Accessory uses on the same lot incidental to any permitted us~ separate business. (2) Signs, subject to the following (a) Detached or ground signs. ( double-faced, not more thn inches in height and twelve ~ in width, the lower edge of v 4-:,~. ~ 10033 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-60 g length and separation. shall exceed one hundred twenty-five (125) feet um distance between principal buildings shall be · 'o (2) thnes the height of the highest building, in/mum d/stance between a principal and an )uildJng shall be twenty (20) feet. :ourt shall have a minimum dimension of sixty md any Outer court shall have a minimum ff twenty (20) feet and its depth shall not exceed flOor ~rea. [Added 5-30-75 by L.L. No. 3-1975] mit in a multiple dwelling in the M-1 General ~ DistricC shall have a livable floor area of not ~dred fifty (850) square feet. except that a one~ dwelling unit shall have a livable floor area of hundred (000t square feet. · ARTICLE VI B Light Business District alatlons. n; building or premises shall be used, and no building shall be erected or altered which is or designed to be used, ' in paa, for ~e following: in whole or ,ses, subject to silo plan approval by Lbo ,ard in accordance with Article XIII hereof. 26.76 by L.L. No. 5-1976; 2-1-83 hy L.L. No. mitred Uses set forth in, anti as rel~llated by, ,wing prow/sions of this chapter: ~section Ai21.and {3) of § 100-30. section AI3~ of § lO0-,lO. § i00-60 ZONING § 100-60 (2) Business, professional and governmental offices. (3) Banks and financial institutions. (4} Retail stores. (5) Restaurants. {6) Bakeshops (for on-premises sale at retail). (7) Laundrnmats and similar establishments. (8) Personal service stores and shops. (9) Marinas for the docking, mooring and accormmodation of noncommercial boats, including the sale of fuel and off primarily for the use of boats accommodated in such marina.{: B. Uses permitted by special exception by the Board of Appeals. The following uses are permitted as a special exception by the Board of Appeals, as hereinafter provided, subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board in accordance with Article XIII hereof: {1} [Amended 10-26-76 by L.L. No. 5-1976] Any special exception use set forth in, and as regulated by, the following provisions of this chapter: la) Subsection Bt2) to (13), inclusive, of § 100-30. (b) Subsection Bt2), (4) and (5) of § 100-50. C. Accessory uses. [Amended 5-30-75 by L.L. No. 3-1975; 10- 26-76 by L.L. No. 5-1976] (I) Accessory uses on the same lot with and customarily incidental to any permitted use and not involving a separate business. (2) Signs, subject to the fallowing requirements: la) Detached or ground signs. One (1) sign, single- or double-faced, not more thnn slx (6) feet sL'c (6) inche.~ in height and twelve (12) feet slx (6) inches In width, Lhe lower edge of ~vhich slmll be not less 10032 10033 Kenn¢lh L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD .MEMORANDUM P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 119 Fax (516) 785-1823 TO: FROM: DATE: · RE: Gerard p. Goehringer, Chairman and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals Richard G. Ward, Chairman and -~/~s Men, ers of the Planning Board Ma~ 25, 1993 Petrol Stations SCTM # 1000-109-1-23 Thank you for your response of May 5, 1993 regarding the above-named site. In our review of same, other questions Came up. Your memo indicates that while the residence was not in Use at the time the Zetail antiques shop was converted to a professional office, it was converted to a combination residence ~nd real estate office at some ~~e~f~le to determine whether later date. Has the Zoning BOard this COnversion occurred before ~=C~Codev r the February 23, 1989 enactment of the new Zoning We are confused about the Use of the barn. In the memo, the Use of the barn is described as a storage site for antiques OWned by the resident of the house. The property owner indicated to us in a letter that the barn was an antiques store The Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building InspeCtor i~ 1993 notes that the b~ilding Was used as a "seasonal antiques store". ~l~q,0 '/Z°ning Board saying that it h ' <x C°mmercial us ~: ~ ~ ~s determined that pbor~ Is the ' archite-~, ~_~ cne ~arn przor to'its .... - .... was no ~ s orZice~ ~u~vcrslon to an When the Current Zoning Code ~ the PUrpose . . wa~ drafted, o · Provid~ =~_ ?~ the Residential Office ~ ~r. undcrstandlng of · ~ ~ur ±lmitcd non-r~{~-~ ~urlcn was that it WOuld residential Uses of ex~sting homes. Thi~] Seems to have been · ........ ~± Uses along with existing echoed by the Zoning Board in its September 5, 1985 memorandum, COpy attached, in which the ZBA elucidated its position that a Also in keeping with this, we understood that the 40,000 sqUare foot requirement for each additional Use applied only to additional uses beyond the existing residence with one accesso~f office use. This reasoning was based on the fact that many if not most RO lots are about one acre in Size. If the intent was to allow these lots to accomodate both a principal residential use with an accessory office use then it Would make sense to require the addition of 40,000 sq. ft. of land only when the addition of a third use was contemplated. If, however, we are reading the memorandum Correctly, the Zoning Board of ApPeals has ruled that in the instant Case of Petrol Stations, the residential Use of a house along with a Small real estate office constitutes two principal Uses; and · that the architect,s office Constitutes the third princiual Use. And, consequently, 120,000 squure feet of land is re~ired. Our Confusion about this point is -- ~===u.aprll 14, 1993, a comv of ~. WhiCh is attached for your COnvenience, !dentlfles the apartment. It may be that the property owner or a me,er of his residential Use of the existing house as a residential · f~ily resides here .>~'~/" f~ily-run h~ .... an~ that the real-estate o~-- · · .. the Owno~,- . ~ =parEment which .... ribes ~ ..... ~- ~ assertion. But. ' --v ~==ms uo contradict '"=~n~? . perhaps We'mls~nderstood the We also would agpreciate clar' ' ~gard is savin~ ho-- - m:~cat~on as to what t~ ~lstric~ L -= -~= amout residential us~ ~ - = -~- betwe~-~' -~ are not sure if you ..... ? ~ = 9Ou~e ~n the RO . _ =u a Principal use of a ~=~= making a distinction Wlt~ a~ ac~ ...... ~=~uence as the owno~,= ~=o~ury r~lly owned real e-~ ...... - .... ~u~u~ or,ice and that of a residence which the owner' ren 'lc also c ~: S:ate business? If thet~o~_ ~ _ ontinuing to run the ~ ~anction for all RO ........ ~uw noaru is making that Knowing fo- = - w~opuinles, then we w~-~= . real ~-~ ~ ~U:ure reference, what d{-~= .... u appreciate · =~ou=te offlce ~Se from m . -.--~n~UlS~es a~ accessor in ute RO district? principal real estate office us~ Finally i~ ~ ~ ' · " ~ . , ,~ ~e~erence to a q~e~tlon posed 1~ o~r previous memo, 1~ all or any of these uses existed before thc enactment of the 1989 Zoning Code, how do you itt . ~Satus? The primary c ester- = erpret their non-confo non_~:~e U~es, density-wise civo~a~us is how to accomodat ~: ~uurormlng status As o~f~T ~,~an ~eems to be their e ~ un~erstandinc of thei .... P e:lous paragraphs of th' .... un-COnforming status led us ~ =.ed for the three uses on ~h& -:= ly 80,000 square feet is - jnulcate otherwise. Are we i~:~r~J::]- Y~ur memorand~ seems to · . ~uu~ng it aCCHrately? ,]'ames Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Richard C. Wilton Telephone (516) 765-1809 BO~qD OF APPF~&LS TOVCN OF SOUTHOLD M~EMORANDUM Tulephone ~516) 765-1.~00 TO: Richard G. Ward, Chairman, FROM: Jerry Goehringer, Chairman, DATE: May 5, 1993 SUBJECT: Petrol Stations Ltd. CTM ~1000-109-1-23 Our File No. 3972 Thank you for your memorandum requesting our review and response concerning the above property, its uses, and proposed subdivision proposal. You may recall that we also have an application, which has not been amended by the applicant or his ~ttorney to show the new plan before you. (The building inspector initially issued a Notice of Disapproval in 1990.) HISTORY OF.USE AND PROPERTY SIZE: We would like to note for the record the following information about the buildings and property as existed prior to 1987, and apparently a Pre-C.O. was issued:: 1) two-story frame house 2) accessory two-story wood-framed garage (or barn) building used for the storage of antique furniture and similar items by the resident of the house 3) two accessory sh~ds 4) property size in acres: 5.836; 5) lot width: 150.30 feet frontage along the Main Road. PRIOR SITE PL~{ APPROVAL Subsequently, during 1986 or 1987, an application was made, we understand, to the Planning Board for site plan approval to convert the garage (barn building), from antique Storage to an architect,s office -- and maps confirmed that the front buildinq was vacant. At the time of the issuance of the Building Permit on December 15, 1987, the front building was not occupied for mixed Uses as a real estate appraiser's business and rental residential unit. Some time later the front dwelling structure was then occupied for mixed Use, not only by a rental apartment unit on the second floor but also for a real estate office. ~ccupancy prior to 1986 on 5.8 acre parcel: Principal ~se: one. A single-family dwelling use. Accessory buildings: three (3) which included an accessory use for antiques. No other principal Use existed prior to 1986. ~ccupancies at this time on the 5.8 acre parcel: Principal Uses: three. 1. Rental residential unit in front building; 2. Separate Architect,s Office in barn building; 3. separate real estate office on first floor in front building. SUBDIVISION APPLICATION The application Presently being reviewed by the Planning Board is for a four lot minor subdivision - different from the original filing for a three-lot minor with a different layout. The maps on file previously did not show 'the converted uses (now occupying the premises), and the map was amended to show two principal Uses:' architect,s office in rear building and real estate appraisers in front building. The residential rental unit in the front building is noted as the third Use although it is not shown on the newest map revised 12/1/92. P.B. QUESTIONs: In answer to both Questions 1 and 2: 1. a variance will be required to Consider allowing three principal uses on less than a 120,000 sq. ft. parcel. Please note that 5.8 acre parcel is proposed with a substantial reduction - and lot area nonconformities will be Created. Each principal use in thc RO zone requires 40,000 sq. land area whether it be nonresidential or residential,ft. of A new proposal showing 120,000 sq. ft. of land area for the three principal Uses to be continued must reduce the number of lots in this minor subdivision. In any event a variance application will also be required for insufficient width for the rear lots as drawn, and reduced frontage along the Main Road for a new right-of-way from 150.30 feet to 124.85 feet. If We may be assistance in any way, please let us know. Gerard E Goehrin ~ . o get, Uhalrrnan · oerg~ DOyen, Jr James Dinizio, J~. Pmbert A Villa Richard C. Wilton Telephone (518) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPF~tLS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York l1971- Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 July. 30, 1993 William C. Goggins, Esq. McNulty-Spiess 633 East Main Street 'P.O. Box 757 ' , -"Riverhead, NY 11901-0757 Re: Proposed Filing of Special Exception · Contract Vendees: W. Droskoski~and S. Owner-Seller: C. Charnews DeFriest .Dear Mr. Goggins: In reviewing the documents left with Our office for review, We find that they are not acceptable for filing or furEher processing for .the following reasons: . --, a) Application Form ZE2 - y · ~ applicant for.tae ~-- . , OU have mod' ' ~ . i . l b _organi=atij f f ception is for=. · .-~Lco~tract n~ , ~zu~erty. Th~ ~ ~ ~z uenant.havin .... --~ '"'::~nbr the ci~sa~e furnished sh~w~9~rs in the excer~==~ azrect khe -- .~cract vendee- -o unat neithe~ ~ ~ ~om the 3.:~.-. . ~weclal exce~_ =, are the non- r . ~ uae ~resent ow~ · ~/....,..;~ ~un Use; P oflt organlzatio~ forer, '....~ b) Section 160-. ' -:.:', for a _ a minim,, = Please del~ze~ which would b~f~nzp clmb. Pleas~-~t.iand ~aeate th~ -- ~ =Pplled Strictly ~ ~.uellneate ~r~eg~er~they are prA~ses and pUrpose of th~=~_=? ~nls Use, and se~ w' · ry or sec . ~mal~ln ~ · ~z shown on = -~g' SCrcenino .... ="~ bUild!nc_ ~ ~ce Planl =, ~ss, ingress, ~ in c) A Certified copy of the certificate of incorporation, complete form, Will be needed. dj A copy of the Current deed of thc premises is required. e) If applicant is a tenant-corporation, a copy of the signed lease, together with a written con Owner is necessar~ ~ ~ _ . sent, from the ~ ~ ~= processing of this application. f) ApPlication Paragraph B must be completed which will list the reasons this use would be in harmony with the standards and guidelines established in the Southold Town Zoning Code and applicable law for approval of this special exception.. g) Letter of intent as to whether or not any other buildings or structures are Proposed for this property. h) Notice Form with proof of mailing of notices to adjacent property Owners and posT-marked certified-mail receipts. i) Written disclosure of officers and directors of the Long Island Sports Committee Inc. and any and all other persons, groups or entities involved with property or these Uses is ~equested. For the above reasons, the documentation and personal $400.00 check from D & D Cycles, Inc. are returned. You may · submit new forms and the above documentation at a later date · when you feel it is appropriate Under the circumstances. Very truly ,yours,. En61oSUres cc: D & D Cycles, Inc. Corner of Cox and Route 48 CUtchogue, NY 11935 Linda Kowalski Clerk of thc Board MAY 1 4 1~93 '" SOUTHOLD TO~N ~ :( ~? Z7 ? ,'f ! / /, t ,II ~4 .1 5Olb, ?