The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-102.-1-33.3 (2) i~ ,f:;' ( .. C p ~,'..~" rl.:c,,""~~f .. T<twJr~io "", MJ.D Sa~~m: 'y~fy ~ Soulhold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July 11, 1984 Mr. Richard Cron Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Seacroft Dear Mr. Cron: Please let this confirm the action of the Planning Board at the regular meeting of July 9, 1984. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board rescind the resolution of June 25, 1984 declaring themselves as the lead agency with regard to the State Environmental Quality Review for the Seacroft site plan located at Cutchouge. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN .~~D TOWN PLANNING BOARD ft OALomLL, Dn d-rv...,o By Diane M. Scliultze, ~cretary _ ~'<4'n~. ~~;':1\'\ ?~l'-!.. {~,f'" ".'r . .h,>. '. ~, ~n"',,-, - ,--. .-,.- ". II+" i ,~.'. (;n-'J':-:-t:~) ; 'J CURREi'';; ?U\:'!S FOR THE 1'50 ~:i\j~~ ;~:Ej1.(~~OFT '.~. C~\..(-".." I" .,' C ,{_.'; 'L' )!";.';;___: . ;;'. trl\~rO(:rJ'E DL;:',^':::F Ri:r;;-:'::-,' 'L,:Q ',~-.\/ l-~';~ ~'~'("'T'ONS WI~H . . ~ ,.-, .. _n.....~ -"""'''-.V """ ~LJ\."'_""" .Jl.... . AI.:" G~,\/t~RZ'i;Vi~~~T~'.L AUT}"IOHiTiES V../;TH CO.\T:~C:.. C\:E.R THE PROJECT. .' / '--",; / . .' / , /'./ '- 1./ ..- ~--4.--'~~--"'~-:_!~_---L':__~~~'----'-:"~.~i~_ S~(i~,A (-JHf:. ~ 1 ,,./ ,. ! I' .. . ,,,,,'.'1:'J .;'.., --', I ,Y .,;.::- / I /' ___L....../._ ----,.~_.Aj.': _.___-f:':"'.::....!--LL_'.~-_~_._ y ______.__~_______ "', NA~~E (PR1~T! NAME iF'H!L\'Ti --~ , '1. '-" '. -.Lj-'- ., -2C 1,.. "f -" ".." '/',h~ f~ C..,- _1.." . _L ~~L ..~.L~. --~":'.!-'~~~____L~_): 1/7..' ^r)r'.~t~S / ZiP .- 1'.:I"'~ ,.,f..r71' . ~. it c::::iJ".}I; t~: t, .', ~ "- .,., . -"'- \:-> . "'....... >.>' ..".Ji- " . , Qlll 0 b01 ::::;\..].\ATURE. #2 C I DID NOT I\NO'N i,BOUT THE TOWN SOf\RD REZ01\ING THE PROPERTY ,PRIOR TO RECEIViNC NOTICE FEO~'l S.O.S. ,'.- ,f"~ O'''';!;.''''il ....;In j 0 Q~ t n tiis.. - ;'~c.~~,'. -l, ,,"1<0/ ". 0~'" ',~f': ! AM OPPOSED TO CURREi'T PLANS FOi{ THE 160 UN,-: ~~!':ACROFT'f1:~ CONDOM!NIU~1IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE RECISTER hY 03c1ECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERl'iMENT,\L AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. 7; ~;/ J~) -_~:"':0.2~._ . . SiGr-;ATUf\E "I l7 l/'...-... ~/ ,'.,' . -...L..L..-=-~--::':L :~~__~,-........J ;\A,"IE (PRINT) SiCiNA7UKE 112 r!" /.:::.. - . ::::....\ " ....;.,;.. -., j" r ... '..'" :' .:- -,/ J/ .......--~--- --"---""~_..o.- . ADDRESS -' .,... :"lAME (?R:~';) .,/::):,~ ZIP o I DiD NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BO/IED 2E?O~:lNG THE Pf:OPERTY _~R!9.~..r:2.RECEIVII~GJ'j.QJ.l<;UBQM_S.0,S. . ..d" -~~ . ~$f: :~iAfi,;; I AM OPPOSED TO CUR!1ENT PLN,S fOR THE 160 U:~;T SEACROFT~' CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER ;-.;Y OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVER~:Mf:Xr/\L ,c.,UTf10RiTIES WiTH CONTROL OVE:'; ':'HE PROJECT. ,'.'/:':': I ,..f '-f" -' .( ,,,\ /) . ';-('I./vi'~, /'~ ," [ ;' -:,""'. f/: _.': _'I! (11.'7'i'" _:\,-!.:/it.,..-!-.u,:..;,_(j~~ __ 2_~:'~"':",:":__:'_'_"_:' "-:-->...:..:i-.,i."f <..<A -' T-H,?'" ~;0:-,:.\;':,mt,"'1 \ ' ~:~.,2AT!J,RE"2 __ !; Lc,,?~0"'~~7J ~5c!i:' L i _L_2'-'::.l~;c::._j'::2.Ll RS .A bL..- Nt,~1:..__,r;';lr-..-rl ", / _~'}_ N':~~~E (P~:~l) 2'.)/7 CJ:2 ;'~~-c;~.ii"'"') i(u'-0.!7" c"~"7!...Li:". ,~~L..L/ q~, (- ZIP .' To SQO.Se w-'fDID (\'OT !\NGVJ r\F!G~IT -;t-1E TO\Vi\ So.ARD nZZ07\;;-~G THE ?RCPERTY ----- -- --......""'..m..in-"";'yncr;.,.~RO~.~..'"i:_O.S. .. ..-.-.---.-..--.--. " - '{~.},~~;~" .' .v,:'~J; ),} 'r I Nv! OPPOSED TO C'u'RRl'N'T PL"'S Fa ,"r'- '" . ~. 1'\1' 1 I" 1'-" . ..d{1+:> ,-ONDOM:NIUM IN CUTCHOGUf pi '~ THE I"~~' u~, i SE,;CROr-T." ALL GOVERNMENT!\;E AUTHORi:"''=.SE;7,ST'-HRc~GD'~S,,:'~.'''Y OBJECTIONS WITH r;.-'J. . / I ,// , '.'J:: 'IV I '/' I K:.JL QVE(L,7HE PROJECT. er /, I /I - / / , '..' ,. '} c;/~"''1<Jbd~' 'i'/, ,.:{;,- i'.,. ., /' I /- ,--;:-. .~~ . 14 ~' ,~ ~ .....ll.;..A....._..,._...~.;....".:..::L...~,_~~ "'.'.. ,', \ ' .. .. '. Slrj:'A,LiRE..t - '".::.....::...,-.;.:.~,:.-"--...-._-;:;:,.:/-:Lt.!!?"l ~ ~A /), // '., J..,..)~ , _', S.',NA1Ut<"2 ,-. ,(/" ., ., IV"!- '-'1' '.'. . o5' "'---~ ..~ :11. ~ ,....-'!...,I._"-~:.~.-,-'~, -'/. . , ~ NAME IPRiNT) ~=.;; , \' '''''''-+-''-f~:'''.G'-':VJ /(0 fA ISt/ I / >-' 9. 4.1/ /.L "1\ I .",. NAME iP'<iNT) 7/:<;71 .., ;~-~..V-LcL-"-!...LJ,.,4 '').'')/'T.!./~ //) AI )/ _"t~.f, ..iI" / AuURES$" " ,-" ----......----...:...:...............:---~_.(,. - . ,5.~' ~ ~ , ~ .t;'t' ~~ . / 2.1'-' y' ~ I DID NOT KNOW ABOU~ THE TO' _ PRiOR TO RECEIVrNG NOTiCE FR6'.~ ~OARD Rr.20NiNG THE PROPERTY DF~ ~a& ,.... r ()C:~n nI ..... 4........ _.~._ To ~~~.. (j'.' ....\ :!!J~;:""g... "'" .' ~~ .' . .,' ,'~ .' ~:7 "" . "" ",,' 0 -<,.] ~~!.,t~~\ .,t""- ,- \/~~':."", . 'l"'~' .. "', '..".j I M~ OPPOSE:) TO CURRENT PU,NS FOR FiE 16r; ~:,,1T SEACROFT 'li~' CGNDO;.,llNIUM iN (.~UTG':OGUE PLEASE REG:SER ~1Y 08JECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTt\L AlftHOR!TIES V.Tfl~! CQ>trEGL OVER THE PROJECT. ." -'(" ..' . , ~ /1 , ;/.' .1' "."1 <t' '"') '; , '/ --~-"=-~~i~';::'~~~~5~i:C~~'E IJ I-~-~ -~~:~/(~~'~i__'_~(~~~~\{UP.E~--~-- '~"i' ',f" ,:/>-.....// /./'r/'- _.. _--y~JJU:\-,~~"" _;>,;.l'-.c..,L~_ __t._~~..:'.::~_.l:_:..:.~ _':___.._~..:::~:-':::.~____ ~AME (r-P,INTl C . '.' . ;\:'.:-~L (FRir'rn C ' ,.... .-; --r , r-r-". 'I <"'" , __ . _ ' .' I; ./ ;( ,_ i~: .....i...V~""!... . ,,? { '-. /\1 (j ,-'~ V t- //. ,', ~ / I / -'..,.I ___ ----~""~\rJI)-11ESS-.----~--- ~----~~---~.------- ---.--I-------zlP ~r ~\]'~i) ,;,~"t. 1(Pi.) ,:,\. C :>J;>~'!t.~ t'!{ ;.~) :~ ~;Y ~ \Z...t7 0 ...:,,:; ~~ l.-J : DiD NOT XNO\V ABCUT TYE TOWN BOARD :~EZ0>;;NG -:'j--lE PROPSR"iY PRiOR TO I'\ECE1V:NG NOTlCE FROM S.O.S. C ENCLOSSf) P~_:~.\S[ r.;\D ~:,Y CCNTR:3tTnO:'J ~-o .:~. O,S. '- ,=,',; ,--- (,?; To Q ,'1) .d .. ~~ ~;:J3'; 'l~t' I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLAN,S FOB THE,.1r:..OYNITSE~\~:~~;r, ;~' C~"')O"I';IUV 'N C" ;~, C','OO[#. PLEASE RECIS I ER M\ O".".v. .ONS WITH ....h~l i'l~.I. ,I <I _'0 . J ~ "'. I __~ .-L'.... PROJECT 'L L Go,/rR"VI"N-n AU-l u"-', j"'S W1T:p' .i:'<TRO~ ", t"" .. It:. t~. j' :.1 I'l H_' 1'- . '\.1' ~~ I L ;''&:6'/__.__//._ ___. ;~-'~u t1:,:::-:;~::~ ~'f. "Y"''';J'''I,?/ I " L (LLfEOt?.D~c rJA-()fi)!)eRj_J~, ..;OIJAJ _ h'. "~?,:~f,,,{!Pt:;~.S 1 NAVt (l hlNl) I ILl . 1!!J71tLOS~__ .------.ndll. 7?)C~. ZIP ADDRFSS ,JlJl 0 t7 J:;i.J,i }\ I Df:J NOT KNOW A~OUT ~HE TOWN BOARD REZm,I:'iG THE PROPEHTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NO j ICE FROM S.O.S. .~ - ",''J# ~ "~'P':;'~f~Y\ . j;~: ,-~r. .ii-t:~ II'.M OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFTt,I. CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PL '-,SE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH AL1;..,GOVERNME~n-l9"ITIES WITH C9SITROL, OVER THE P'i'OJECT . ~~,~:"~~J "'~~~-:"~/~!uuJ YdU'::L1-l,~;I~ SiGNA11iRE "'I S;G~^ TUi~E -2 ... "',,.... -.", ~ ,/;:) ':;~,~}~ l5f r:'t~ {~\~ .'tiP 3'~~"/a 1 NAMEIPRINT) hI -l/} J ... . ,-,.).'1E,IPH';'''' 'ti':2L22/1 a;~_./-,~/!.Z.r ,,1.!.-"_LlZ1-Q2:-72?Yif.) f I\DDHESS .J ' ~fJ~7 lIP ~ o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOW:'-1 BOARD REZ01';iNG THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. 30 '4~.' 0" '.' ~ -.. '" ~o' o~o .' '~'J:; . I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 U~~iT SEACROFTli!. CONDOMiNIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY 03,JECTIONS WITH I/Z~~~~~~J{l 7:0;: \\On< cO~~~~~:<.2~~~~~2aJ; k SIGM;UJ(C" , "''''',!''OE '2; ;Fe 1(,'..:_ r:"jL~;:l/ ("(1,' <.J C. J..il~ ':':_1<' vt ,1.1 [:0 t--'V NM.1f-: W.(i~T) ~^.Yi~: YI..i,i;'\;T) , l1/~_'_._:_Li.~i~~:~~~:..!_.JJ,,!' /~ (\ '/~'~~''''~i..:_ ..!._'-,-,~_{'__~-i:;-s~~e__i/ i.' "{j-- ADDHES<'; ZIP ~m NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZON:~;G THE PROPERTY _n - - - - ____ -.._..... ......_ C'l To ~.~ () ~ _.. -~~ tl r1. .~ ......'.. \, ~&~' tII~", '~r. I AM ():'P~?;CD, T<? CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT--','~'~ ' CONr)v~L '!v~, I~i CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REG'5TER MY OBJECTl6NS WiT!:! ALL GOI, Er\NM~:N.;AL AUTHORITIES WITH CO:-<TROL OVER THE l?ROJECl . . /. i.. , "'I /', IICg) cLc<~ "=-_C\<c~ \ Yf2,." ".U p" .':U.~ SIGNA ''''[It:" "1 '. I' .. -.' .I......--........._~""._,___"'-- I. y... - I j U,'r. ~ S:G!\iATURE . /)) (~, /-l ,,;:: ,. ;.J;.; / ^ , ,.,.., - ,,',-- ',--- '.1\. ::>.,- ,-,.-;----.. -- , " -+:':"_--~'-~ "'<-.-. j..,.;=; ~V~~..~. l C ~ V - NAME IPR1NTI, --- ~- NAME iPHi,"ITJ ~ fJ /J TJ' ; 7 U <:~t{~__L\L.Y., /)1 /; -r -r I T r f r _ k' ;1.1 y ADOF\ESS ' --_____L___...+_~ _ . '"' v, " / lit:') ;;;.---- '- liP / 19~ 91 I OlD N!;?T K~OW M30UT THE TOWN BOARD REZONrNG THE PROPERTY PRIOR 10 ReCEIViNG NOTICE FROM S.O.S. ' ...._--_._. ----- ---- -. -. -- ---- - t.':~',.,~, '~l, - .~,.' . .fiH,.., .,11.~ . rAM PJ;?OSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT:~~\!':: COlUbO'MINH~M l~.-CYTCHOGWE PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ~L1Lt~~~P~::~;?~~~ 1n~rmi C~:~~~:~;II:U;HR~E::~:~~ I . _ c ';' " /'" j / J ';-.. ,.ui'.\.;:....2 .LL'YJ'Il!.. f;:,-,~~1n.;~';,t::,/!.''f:j::,.c._ --_1'0.1;!~i.;./i!'J.~Ak.-,e 11- J:IJZr2_15f-3~rm~~~.~~UJ.~___-:S:$~~. s::::~t'/~:.____ .A! u... ~ CA () 1 2,: <i-"- II f' ':C- CIP ~ i DID NOT KNOW ABOUT TdE TOWN BOARD EEZC~iING Ti-'E pnnpc-t'TY PRiO? TO RECEiViNG NOTICE FROM S.O.S. . "v ~.,. [J ~'\jC:LOSED rr.r..;SE t:;{D ~~y CO;\~R!3UT!Or--;;0 S.O.S. ..: ~SO r, ~2S 'IDS,.... O.~" .~,.' . ~ If. ~'" Ic..~... 'e' . ~U'o ....--._.-__~_.h___ .._____.____... ....__ --------- ToS 0 ~1 -~~ j,'T~J ~ {JJ (91 ~~' I AM O,POS"D - "n-- _ '. ~i1fr: , ...Jlll 0 CONDOMiVu'", ',1NO CCUuTKC"HLO'" G' ~;:K~,S FOR T'-1:-: ICG UNIT SEACROFT ~~~# ~ . ,., . , ,L.c .~ EAS- R -GiS- -- M 0 ALL GO\iE~(NMt:NTAL AU7HOR;:"'iE~ '\'\/!=H -:;o~,.,'. t.", ,y EJECTIONS WITH .f;' 1, .: ~ Ie" J ROL ovm THE PROJECT. _~...r~:_p :tP:t:LLi,.r::;ff,.':!;~~? .- SIGl'iA lURE "1 1....-::- U!.., SiGNATURE "2 (I . ~.d.ME iPR!:':lTI i.' / ; .,(.L!.;.-_ h. " ) ~4'-4(",.::.1:[LLU~t!.A/..-J-i~vr J ADORE55 ~ . '..,--- ZlP [J I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT Th" TOWN ~ ~. PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTic~ FRO~! ~~.~,u hEZO:-.lING THE PROPERTY . ~ -. - --- -... ...... ....r- T-n.., " ""H r"r'\"I\ITOIt.H TTI.-I':\l Tn .c::. n s To S.OeSe ' . -4~~ ' I AM OPPOSED TO CURREN~" ,~~r: CONDOMiNiUM IN CUTCHO' G' U\E,:ANS FOR 1 HE 160 UNJT SEACROFT . '.~. ~ ALL GOV-RN'M "PI E.\S. R-G'hT-R . . / c , , ENTAL AUTHOR'T' ,,'S: ;"1'::- ,r, '.::',c.. MY OBJECTIONS WITH -2. ," . I IL vv IH CONT""" OV '~~,. \ ."'. .. (1. .. ' . . . .-,vi.. ER THE PROJECT. , , .'-;"'J! -.~~('rtRH\J "';;;L'-'::', ./A'}:;~f~{i-<..J? . SfGNAIURE'2 G~~--L,~;:::t.tJ2;;.Lk<:~ p;-- (:' _ NAME (PRINTJ ADD"ESS' n__..."J........~.;..> "::-:;:~:!', ....--:" )~;'/ ,1':::;-' " -". ---':_~<'''- L/ ~ ~ I DID NOT KNOW ABQUT "-/iE T .. n " ( ZfP _____= ~~IO~!O RECEIVING 'No-freE F~~~ ;;~^.~DREZON!NGTHEPR()D""TV NAME (PRINT) I AM OPPOSED TO CUHRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 Uen SEACRaFT CONDO:-1IClIUM ICl ClJTCHOGUE. PLEA:oE REG'ST!:"\ MY 03JECTIONS WITH ALLGOV;::RNMENTAL AUTHORiTlES Wr:H CC.:;'ROL OVER THE PROJECT. II /j ,,\ '! 'j' ....~"!' .If ./-' l' " { /,;,~. (;---, ;./~........ . \,"(,,~, .. .. ',", .'J- , ---...,..tr"'" --..-- ..1__ ..'1.1....:.-1-_.. -'1------ r i J Si(;;-'.~TUSE"1 , '> IJ'. 'I' f" " f " JI/ _____.~'.t_Ll,,:__ _J)j:!.=Ll:L!Li-.- i'"Ar--.[ [['HiNrl ' ;-:> ~ ,..,. /. - ,I' ;)'''!'/ ~."~'~~ t..,I/~~-;~A(ir.'V'-:;' f~.,vl. _...c_'.>o!__-^--__:tL-"""-l.:I-_..__u, ,..----~-\-"-.~-,_.,.-._---- ..,-.-...-~.- ADDRESS " -. ~" To S.OoSo SIGNATURE "'2 ~AME (PRINTI 1/f'sS~ liP A I DID NOT KNOW A30UTTHE TOVJN 50t,"::; ;,=ZC~Jlt\G THE PROPERTY PRiOR TO RECEiVING NOTiCE FR01'l. S.O,S, TO~S 0'" S -. " ." ~ . ~ c e -'to . . '., .... ,~ .. . .-), ' tl:'I:> 1 AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDO~iNiUM iN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGiSER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL,GOVEr.N~ENTAL AUTHOf-;iTlES WIn, CO;\TROL OVER THE PROJECT. J:' J1/" ,..~" "( it-v .LZLtL-"'-~-'~ .':.;p...'...,.." t ' n1~~ f:: ~.rN^n;RE."l {i' \ SIGNATURE "2 . ~., 1"1 ul/.L!J.5. OJ :.s,<,'::JS E-. ~"(..L.{I-.:;)"- V '1!"A~.JPllNTI (? -;- .... ut;,; ,ME fF'RINl1 '-.<'iL.",<(.~L,& '_Yd!-c.t.- ~cLL.~.(/-!:,~i , [. , //17/ ADDRESS ZlP o I OlD 1'\OT KNOW ABOUT THE TOW;'; BOI;?'O r:i:ZONiNG THE PROPERTY PRiOR TO RECE:VING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. rviENCLO"-FD R' "A C E. FIND MY CC "'T""F '-'0" "'0 '0 Q ,-...J ... '-'_ . ~L...O I. ..",. .1.I;JU 1. J,~' ~. .~. o $50 [] $25 -. .'JlJl [) , ,~, O"""""D -~ (-. ,~.o.., -~. . "" F~- --, r" ,.,..- S-AC ..1),; . III i h~, \~.,,:Il-. l~__J ~l.';',I'\C,,: r;..~\;''hJ uK l.t...:.;' ',j U,'OJ, c ROFT .,,~. CO~DO~1IN]UM ;;\= CUTCHOGU:::. PLE.~S:: REi.. ~l-;-::R MY OBJECTIONS \VITH ALL GCVECRe<ME:\T.'\l, i\UTc:OEiT:ES W:T; CC'i,RGL eVER THE PROJECT. 'b; /;:.:..... .,/': ..'r- I I /. F '::,~~;:~- -Sj(,i~~;~~0~!4L-1- !-.~-;~/~\tl~JA~<~ ~-- \j' v \j r . -f""E if'RIN'~0 ;) -:;rt' '\ ~--==--~ :f- NAMFfJ'Ri~I!2,~:Lq ~~"2...-~.:.7.-';;:""-~~~-=-~< L~, J )?)L~~/t-fA.>L'~' ~ - 1_ S-~ ,\DCRESS _.~- r l.lp - o I DID NOT ;-;NOW ABOUT THE TCWN BOA.RD REZONING THE P., PERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTiCE FROM S.O.S. ""S' .~~ ..O.'t" ;.c., '<01:. If! t'. '. ~I 'ill ..... ~~~ijjO . 1984 -. .~~~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT~' CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH AL~L ~3VERNME~;AL .~~;HORiT]E,S WITH CO~;'~~~ O;~R ;HE P~T. ',-;;,'-' "-/I"~I~t~~Rf;'l"'" ". - __~:~<..-o~~~p,,,,;;q..(.,L'0 , / -- iJ. c; . . 11 f-'., r,? "J<;. A r<.f\,'; ,1-- _~_LA( IFf., ..\./I'.'_.cIA!)" rt. ~/,r)t-f\. \ Nl\ME (PRiNT) . NAME (pRINT) l'~{')'1 \, (.,1' c-V1IJ'V ! /1".. ,"I;-rrl.II"(...I)C~ /Ifl:<;;- _ ,'\.t:! -';"'_~'-.( 'r.... """-'-" L.=._1L)....,I.::-_ - _~'-'~ .- ADDRr:.SS To tt9 n~' . /,.~ ~lDiUili)~. /' Gi-'1 DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRiOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. 'ib S~O.S41 -~ ,.< , :'4 . :~~~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THi: 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE R:':G:STER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVER"iMENTAL AUTHORiT:ES WIT:-J CC.,TROL OVER THE PROJECT. \ - ~S1,,;,^t~I~'''''''-'-- _"::'t::l~LL._1iE:{"u")3,f(J~ :--;/\~""E ir:;I~n'i .-. ..... NAilE (PRI1'-iT1 ..b_~c.{t_D;::,.).\rrL15~,_':LLL:?~_c.<:,I~~_:;'-i.bJ .'1. Il~ ~ A();A\ES~, ZIP S:GNA1URE "'2 ~l DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN SOARD i,EZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING, NOTICE FROM S.O.S. TvS~O~~~ -~ J AM OP,?'.~,D ,0 CURR"T PCAN5 fOR THE '00 UNIT SEACROIT .~' ;~LNgf.~~'i~~~. !~~.-:~L r;~i:,.G O'.!'~T~~~!Ti,~'\~g.'.~f+~.:~~~v~~Ji~Z2~I?NgJ~gTH J.iLI,I,v ../",J V j .. ....-,? ' ... j..- .,.....Jo.. , l.,-' ,J', 1'..... t'~.~ , Ii - - . ,----.----.--;-jj-'-~~j'!::'~..'Y~_~~_ "_ _/',:j~V"'.........., . "'- .... SiGN:\rvF\E "I < -~- ;..r--......--'--..........,.;....r--.:.__ "- \; ffl <:.. .. C"> '. ~ . SIGNAT\JRE"Z - _.1 e~ NAME ~~, -,) IC!Qr ! I)) P1 /1.:; ~ S1 7) ()If: /1 ~ _ 0;" /J J if,; I ',-. I NAME IPRIND -,,-,sV-'~'.;I N-l-'.,l\. r~ cmi.t<.:::'... '\ ,{ II "r " ('. ADDRESS ,L ' _ ,. -I ~ ___ , ZIP o ~~~~,;<~;:: ~~~~~7~g~b+~U~t.~_~.~~,~.D "EZONING THE PROPERTY 70 t..,~. u "0:" ....~ '..--... '<i(" ~:..... I." :::J ~ ... ,,' ." ..... -~ ~. e ".,~ ~ ! AM OPPOSED TO CUR _ 'y~fA\ CONl?OM!NlliM IN CUT~~~G~A.NS FO" mE 1[,0 UNIT SEt'CR 'Jj'l; ALL GOVERNW'NJAL " ~, PLEASE REGISTER " ,OFT ...~. \.......... "~ j I. G..}fJi ORn:!ES WITH CONTROtY OBJECTIONS WITH _ In.~, tJ.L:. ,v/.;,~ ~. I OVER THE PROJECT, ~.J-:.,LJ-i.L__ . ( 'r'-....., 11'7 1'1 r, v- \.) s,~uml'} f"~ --- ~k'-'-_".o:{{ /'7 -f'"..'? V\ ! r SiGNATURE "Z t~ r- ...-:..-----~~_Ll./ LJ . I '7 I <!;A';IE IP"".o I -? --+r- '-2--~---1.nL_rl~..lld1 C ';. " " .. ' NM'E ,PRiNT; ,I r ADDRESS' 1 , ' , '--,---LL/LJ (I II '1 5.S{ 'y I D,D NOT KNOW ''-BOUT THE T .. liP ~RIOR TO RECEIVING NOrlCE F~O\V:'; ~OO,..\RD REZONING THE PRO"E"TY . . t;>"(" O~.,... . J,',..:.t, S . '. t\ ~ -., , "~DP'-''''F'l '. .-' $-"'-' ........ 1...,.CJ"\Jt. .ND ~Yiv CC"....--..-. I W JO [J ~,2S .. '. ~. ;<",:)0 TiC;"; ;.') ,~. 0 _r" --:-.----, -~!\; ~'';: 9 ~, I ,... rop~o~~" ~o rlJ""~'T'" ,. "C t.,.., ',,': 1." ",'IT C~ACROFT "l1.. ,,,,vI V y ,'Jt.U j t._ I'.r'.~.~.: l..\:~-..J "'..1:', ",!" ~,;"II....... -..JL", . CONDO,v.n,IUM 1:'-1 CiJTCHOCUf,. "''"-Ef'.::.; 1:i-.i:'S""-": Tv.':' OBJECTIONS WITH ALL G ". '''R''M''''T.'' AlJ..'-lOI"....~<.; 'I""" .', ~"""CJL oveR THE PROJECT U\i.......I'J <-.., ",'- L,. ; ..I........... ~/..,. " '.,.. I..,. __ ''/ . -------=. '_P, I "M f C?"2.".;...<ztif~7r<;T'.;'-' .. --"'C/.':~~Y:rdi3.f.~~~~...c~ /.:..1'L~~_~4?~_ _<)-~~?<J_;,-'~;';.ctt:"_~~"/ . C~/L~f.y~_~::._._eu2_CC.':"::~4-f A~ ~A1-:F. d'R:nn NAME (PRINT) '~~€-"-~4't;.~;?..._.t'-;...4_-T".c..r~.;~~_____.!.._~.:?:::~_ ;:?;2k.':.. - '5"'~ "A-"'A1Irr::/C~(;._ ,'nRf"S -. ZIP" 'Y,-. ,'l. ..c>. /.?"Z- ..,. .~"'" .'f""J ~ G ~::'"'' "~'~. (\;'1'.. ",-." . ,~. <<.c.. _~.~ . 'c~ O't~"~~t.~O . t:,'"' ., ;,j.. ):(1 DlD NOT KNOW ABOUT THE ,OWi'1 BOI;F:D REZONING THE PROPERTY ;:>mOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To ~;. 0' f:.~ -~ ~~~ .' o~@ . '~LG I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS ;"Of{ THE 160 :JNIT SEACROFT .t;'\. CONDO;;';IClIUM iN Cl}TCHOGUE. PLEASE REC;;STEH MY OBJECTIONS WITH f1'f:J. GOVERNr.'fNT..~r.. AUTHORITIES W!TH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. (JLi~1'Jj'J!:.//"V::t7;'c:le(';iL f/.2.:{(A^-:M LY11t;i-~/ J,- SiG,^1\'RC'J . CI SiGNMURE~i7~/- , ..JJ...~J.--D"J1}J,d2iLc.~L '....: ;':;l~'.J.:I:L..5-,-_Di.d"'vlc...c..L- NAME (F'ltoli"iTi IJ I NAME lPRINTI U -I ;. L'(~ ""(:'~~~i;o~)~ I' \~"\:\'~-~-~'l~~~-:~2.1:,C":K.. ,L~tJ\ " z~L'1.J~""'" \... ~.\ I......"O'-''t' ~ ....~,\.\<.:':..")u_"" l''-'' , o I DlD :'-lOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOAHD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRiOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. '.---.-...-.--.--..,.--..--..-----. "..-.~.._-_._-_._.~,-------" ~~ ........ ~.~ .io ~OO@~1Oi -. . ~~. I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL;VTHORITI::S WITH CO:'iTROL OVER THE PROJECT. Q, A1 .~;;\ ,;. 'Io.A '1':1 - ---- }~~(.,.,t;C~L~'~~_~ _ ~IJ '. S,Gb"luP.["l '. ~_~ V~. ..' .~, ""';'j"" V"" . ..... ''''.. ", " ,.' "':,. - '~"'''Jb.~-v'~''-'-- -~ (j. M"'~."f,:,If:... ? vdJ. J'.'il\~1E. (p)'~n '. '. '. ,,_m.. ~' ". "'.". ~ e;.;":..,, <":':.'. . ;'~'111'~ -, '~>' '" ';.,' c-~ ,~ W~;" , <. '..<>i/;'. ,.' '~~ . '. j'~"~,:?,,,,,,,,. . .... ......"'... ..-",..~....--~tf Au,,',u.;)::' ~IGNATURE #2 1~.1 o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE ,OW!'; BO,\RD REZONING THE PROPERTY DOl110 Tn. UJ:'r:=rtIiNr:;, NfiTlrF FRnr..1 S.O.S. 1"08,,008@ -. I AM OPPOSE;) TO CUQ:1ENT P!..ilNS FOR ;Hi: 16C UNIT SEACROFT . '''i Cm;DOll-ll::;UM ;N CUTCHOGlJE PLEA:'E HFC;:S,m MY OBJECTIONS WITH A~iGO;:':~~~"::; ~UTHOR' "" W,"', U~~;RJC OV'~9";?:l~ -- j ~~__~4-1j j _C3 ~ l.~'~ v_~ \~_ -->;::~'::~~<I~:::;t- '/.6-.."~/:'.-l( ~ .,- i SIG:\!\Il}f,f.-j ,./ /'SJNATURE-;Z-~- ";:ll\.",,, H. il">;<"";", 1-0';"1' '~.'.,~ ...k A.I1J A"-' J...~^ -"-'-- i"\ ....\........-...h~ /1) ~~jl '~j'" o ,'" NA~E IPRfi'iTj V -- - - ~V-C..J~\"'~t (PRINT) _.1....0.'-(:,"., ~l.':l c....:r~.i4 Id~ ^~~~ ZIP ~ I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. o ENCLOSFO PJ "Ace ....." __.. --_._.~_. "'. f"- "t"") ~;~ -'(~ j;3;'~'1'1::'.. ~~~ .i~' . "'('~:", . . ':~_~?'{ Vr!iJ~' 9' $.,~j,> NS FOR THE 160 V"'" SEACROFT'.'il' ~rgg;k~~~..J~T~~~~. ~"J'!rgc,;~,ng~;~~i;~v~~J~~r;?,w;J'fg,H '-)J1 ./1'.- /I.,,,/J/,/)-'n .:j~'r~rr '~_J.,..t"J.___..__~;" '-...,.- ... SIGNArUHE"2 ("J,(j:r<ATU~f. rr-, Ii _ jl ~ /.'r~'/ '-.. y....,n -;"'. ( . ''''''''/'''' j .....1 "'-1, ., .f' '.:---->.LCI I ! / , I _,~.'L . I . i<AME !Frl.INYI '.~ ~; O. , , ,'."~ 1 rt .,... ., }..,., _A :..:'>.>-")....) ,""!' ~ \., , ;,~l:;' ..2_Ll~r--~r1":L....i'"LJ~~,-""_~_L,:""",_-,,,: ~~-- AnrF~ESS NAME. IPRIr-m !1 q ~<) ;!ip ~/ I Dl~ "0'" K1"OW ABOUT THE TOWN 501\HD RcL:O!':!NG THE PROPERTY 'IL; .U j'l J _.- C'" S' ,t'"'I ,'" P~;O" -0 ""r,"',\I'NG NOTICE ~i' J:V" .V.J. (',.1 i'\. r > l.\.~.. " -~'1 ("\cC'..... PT '.~ ~,~r; r~ND j\.'iY CON-:-2:3UT:CN TC S.O.S. .'\_',,';' L.."."_ . To (.'~~ ,:>.'r,.' _~ . . ,,'""'l .e., ;~.". - .';.(.!~..', '., ~ f:J '-:::.i~ t;:,~~"':;:." '~r l.'l~~ OPPOSED TO CURE"i\T Fl..~."S "():~ T: it -,,":~' ~.EACROFT :~~ . [JVL 9 '98~ COc.;)OM;"iU~1 IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEAS:: ",:C'~';' . :./ 03'r:CTIONS WITH .., ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORiTIES WITH CC~.';i\J. C\::" THE PRq<JECT. ~ ~~(L~~,,}~dl:"ft( - - ,-l(~__:~~:.:_c_._~:_-_./~_.."-- L /~<ry~..Ci1 Sl(;NATURE"'l .3.G~t\TURE"2 -- jMt. .wd j'\lrs, NAME [I fhC0[t;Jre A. ~toll ~:~Soundvlcw Avem.:o AfJD~ ~ iJ Southola, NY U871 . NA.V,[ (PHiNTI lIP ~. ;'Z I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD EEZON::O<G THE PROPERTY PRiOR TO RECEIViNG NOTICE FEOM 5.0.:;. :fo~t~S ;::JQ ~Jo . <9 -t I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNiT SEACROFT CONDOMI:'-:IUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLE/\SE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WiTH AL~' r 'VEHN~1E~L AUTHORITiES WITH CO~iTHOL OVER THE PROJECT. , ",,- '" /- ;1 / .-j; b/ J,.f.a:j)~~':"V:~_:#T_t/;D~ --. - . sr,....y;.'\TURE #1 SlGNATURE"2 ___f}2:f-f-/J!,f' ---F:. tLC'J'!tZ ~. ~ .JV\~r WRit" [', eL ... NAME (PRINT1 "'!:7 .:.:..- <~AII"'... /r f1 ~-/' " .....;;~,u""*L;;7!;;LJ/y:, ~~t-,.o>,:.d7.l.~ AUOHFSS C ZIP o I OlD NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TO'....N 80,\RD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. Tosn ~ ~~ -~.. ", .. ~ .~r; . ." <JJ~ilt " / . . ..11> I AM OPPOSED TO CUHRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT .:~. CONDOMI;--;IU~ IN C\JTCHOGUE. PLEAS!:' REGIST):R ",IY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AZ.JTHOHIT'ES Winl co:--;mo!.. OVER,THE PROo;r--T. rALv ;;:t (} ~ /' (- /~ i"'-- I! '1k I' I '. .. .' ",., -vt'1-4 . ~ . f . ~..:L- _."j,~_~' I S[G~A HE "1 / SiGNATURE-2 - -.------- - tY1 ~ (PRiNT) /. i'jAME WR1N11..J. _ / ~he.S. (J' f cI_::L+tts..LtnJ;,~}-?r..__JJ\~~t:8~j) ,<:7. 0 (0" -,:'DU"f"7:::' c V ~r c..- t.) Ci :Y"';: ;:? ?~...-- ZIP' o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOAHD REZONING THE PROPERTY . . ---.PRIOR TO HECEIVINc; NOTICE fROM S.O.S. _m__. _____._______ .._.___ To S 0 S . I AM O;:~E~:~ :l'RRE:TPI ^NS FO . -, .~, CONDC'AvHNIU~l IN CliTCf-'C)G ;.". .~r:. :~E ,16~YNIT SEACROFT .~. ALL GOVERNMENT ".t/AUTHO~lT~~~I~;HKCg~;f~O" /-10YVOBJECTIONS WITH _S!/'(~:..'~:,,-ct'~~J.'7--' " '., '- ER THE PROJECT. :""0" ,,-".. .? r S::::".~AT{)f(E";' Av #" ".' (,... i'~. ( h ---~- ...~:~ - ___':{_~':!_~___~,Di'~~)u.I...j j" ._,./ ., ;'VM\~ WHll'iTi ,,v, ",<" ') -~:___!!~G_'~:'!/~---:; j,l:1~.!';- MJnRESS ----.-- SlG:-IATURE -2 ,or __ ,_ ~ , NAME: IPR1!'.'TJ V.e <:tf{{.."i:..__"Sj 111:!J~ . ZIP ~ 1 DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN t', ~ _~ . ..L~RiORTO RECEIVING NOilCE FROM I~..~Dnt:t..ONjNG T~E ~ROPERTY To (:Gl ItJO..~.nj,~'~:"".~ ~r..~" ,<(,'~1\ _ ~~ '." IS> 'i& - ",;,.!-"~..ti..; . 'io;~,^. , ~ ' :~~ 1 AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS Fml THE :60 U~~IT SEACHOFT CONDOMiNiUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGiSTER !\lY OBJECTIONS WiTH ALL;;;OVERN~J.ENTAL AU.}1.ORIT!ES WiTH CON,ROL OVER THE PROJECT. .Fe A7 /' t:T) [/l /J ....'\L/', L~<-c<. l l.jJj#.c~':----~-~____~___ 13rc( ~ .~SI(;';\r\j~IHi: -"..:l:s-C{r. c S- SiG;-;ATUfiE"2 _____'-'_.L1L___.__~ .---- 4 I. I~AME 7NTl _ I' / _ NAME (PRINT) _/.:1_I...0LI1...:."..._~_o.t..L.., CC:LD;:~~ "'JJ!.L{:L. AD(It,ESS /1 fYS- ZIP C ! DiD NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN EO ".RD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRiOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. o ENCLOSED PLEt.s= fE\D MY CO:\TH13C;~O:\ -;-'0 S.O.S. .. ~. <\:r:c, ....... -'..~,.....-_........,. ............-'.,._._.-.........;.,.....,.--~~...,.....-. . '---.'''-'--- .--~-~- -..-.......-..........---......"'''"''-'-,. .. I Ai'-'i 0r::-()s;::~ TO CUQRENT PL.'~\:\S FO::\ T:--n:: :i.6tl :_jN!'~ SE.L\CROFT ' .~~ti\~ CO~:DO~--1:Nl~;;il\ :N CUTCHOCUE. PLEi\SE REG:ST:,~~ .',1'{ CEJ::CTJONS \NiTH ALL If\.NER~MENTI-\LAUTHOhiTIES WiTH CON-""GL01JE;{ '[!-IE PROJECT 1/'1 'i f / . I' , \ \ ; j' r,l !..,I.. " (....,\ '\,'" ). ~ T~,L-L~-~_~~.~-:!.. - --l-y_~_:~~'-L:.~__i~_~ /// ~ ~;tNATlJRE #1 J . -'S;(;!'~.Y;-l\RE-2 I~.~- ._?"::~:~~\J:L.r;:C,J.? -.rr.B_!-.~:.:':_..::~::=-C A-l,e, f::- J.-- -. _.... :;~\~.~1U.'$,l-i'-lTl "'-'j. _ _ __ :v-.w': :;-':li!'iTi I b..~_L.cl..:/...__--.:~:?_~.____L.!'~if-~.J.._t-: N- ( ~___ <;'~l.-1 Hoc tcL /- ./' ADDRESS ZIP ~. I DiD NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOW~ BOARD REZONiNG THE PROPERTY PRiOR TO RFCFiV:N~ NnT;ri= -r:rinM .<:: ,., ~ __'_'__'___..u._. 'lot> ;~~.'~. 0'. '. ~" . >~~. ;.:-:~'" :~.k.,,;. e'........i~ ..' f.:j .'", , IJUL /) 1984 -~~ ,:\ ~,~'; ~~r : ....~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 1&0 UNIT SEACRaFT ''j,\: CONO(~fv)iNIUM :N ct;;1'CHOGUE. PLEASE REG!ST?" ~lY OBJECTIONS WITH Al v.G(~""-"""M-'~'~h~ A'-' 'ORI'''':S W"I'Tv L-O"T'O-' C' 'C'" TI T PROJECT -x., _');vt'::'J.'l-:f1Z.~ V.l.. U j 1,:1 11.... ; I l,. !,\~'L 'VL.. i.... . /- h. / /"/ / ! " 1//..-,,<.1 ~ / '/'i' ,j' .' -' _ .~_Lj:,C-L~'_~~. .'..::.~}\J.:;t:-L.:"-_~'!~~~ j Sl(,__~~,\rliRE/ 1 ~lj~_~_Q.li(.~t~~, ;!~?~T~:hp~nf3~__ NAME ;?Rl:\T) "'Q ,-, ~.. (.., ~~"i~r-""Q7"'f-':,i. .....Ty "'lC':)r) ----------'- __..-l..lD...\..___-i..;.......,.,__.\I._..".,.._".__~ ..~\O..~..~..~...:......-.L. _.__.__. AD[)i{[SS 70 tt\~ ~r,;. ~ ~ii.I~."$fe SlGNATliRE #2 NAME iPBlNTj ZIP !M"1 DID NOT KNOW !\BOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZm>iNG THE PROPERTY PRIm: TO RECEiVli'iG NOTiCE FROM S.O,S. ''''0 -If""l n."; '. ~':<:'"'ll A' ,.""., "U' ,. , ~F4 ~" ;_~.,> . .~ ~."""I{;'''''''e ~" , '-f> ' In . .',.~~~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 U"i!T SE!\CROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTC~OGUE, PLEASE REG!STE!": MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL2?ERNMENT:Y'- gTf;9~IT;ES WiTH CONHOL OVER THE PROJECT. --" I I -'" ;1,..- - ~.' ..r /'t. .." ! 1:~ .'... I'. ,,~;!..- '__'-.' ,,,. _, '.",;' ....VL-\o',~~_ ;---- \ SIGNATURE"l 1 l /' " fi,'. "e' f tJ~\rr'L,~__"" 1"',':':'11 f'~, .. ~AME (pmNT~ . lJ(K.S,S6..f..f "fti~~~c-~.~1(T~t r h It Ii f1)" ADDRESS 7' I SIG~ATURE -2 NAME (?HlNT) ZIP '\6. I f?r~N.':?T KNO~:, ;~B<?UT ~HE TO~: ~OA~D EEZON",G THE PROPERTY ._7' P~(h..... I.. RFrrl...~(~ Nn.TrF ~R. ".If ."n~~. _ __ To ~ ;!},O" ;, 8;,:n -~.;' ~. ~t '~1. .~_..~ \ Q .:;" 49 "l\J., I AM OPPO:',c:) TO CURHENT PLANS FGR THE 160 Ui'\IT SEACROFT -:I:;,. CONDOMiNIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE RECiSTER ~lY OBJSCTIONS WITH ALL GOV'-R'" ,'-,..-', A' rr..,,,.,'T,"S \' n_,-, r-"T,'''' '" ,-~ TUE PROJECT .;; c. .1IYIt..'l.I:\... .1....l...,!'\.I.L 'Vllil ~,l).\..\LJLU\ly:_:-\ II . hJj t!./2 I' /1 vi. 'rf.,_,",/,,')!, f,1J Jv ~ ....dtt:'(~~M---Sii;t5~~;~;;).k-r- "~~"'~:"~'- /..~-2~~;~~;~~~~iL#~vt~ LII--..LL/!Ui~JLj(l~'JLlkJI.lJ~ iI Nl\/'-IE (PRiNT) ~l\~1E (PRINT) f5~"iJAt.b!~J1. ft.!L(vTc..d"..LL23S .5Lf'~F AODRESS ZIP ~D ";OT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROP':RTY PFIOIl,O REC':iViNG NOTICE FROM S,O.S. -~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNiT SeACRaFT .t,\. CONDOMiNrUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH AI.L~O~rNM~NTAL AUTHORITIES WITH C,ey.TROL ,OVER THE PROJECT. C:!lj,.(ZL';fj;~~.I;1' 0':..(':,,::~::_..."~ll-:1.c./.../:~ $IC..!"A rURE 11 ~ SIeNA .UtE #2 ...clf1lt::J..~-.i....eL._"_C .~L~ Q.a-r.t4~ \,<; .~ .:"J:~:::'ii,.'::X---.C.~D~ N.!L- NAME (PH!:"IT) NA,\1t: iPRI:"'1T) I ~ ~ j.1.........J~d.L,...L3_::J_:-i_~,_.L~_M.L__~"O,.----S-.~.:?:_L't~_!.-'~'-~ '71 ( ADDl{ESS ZIP ',... ~'.. l~'?l", ~n.... '"..~ U' ' 3"" ,. ','.\. i."< :!Q" >. 'Ii!) , .. <!it ." (i) :J I DID NOT i\0iO\V A30UT THE TOWN BOP,RD REZONiNG THE PEOPERTY PRIOR TO RECEiViNG NOTICE FROM S.O,S. C E:--iCLOSED PLEASE Fj:-~'D MY CGNTRI3UTI\J:-; .;-0 S.O.S. r_' c',:", -ti)~ To .~~J 't~ . ~~ ; AM :::~O :~,: ',^'5 CO", '"' 'W UN" SCACROFe - ~-i'ul .9 Cm'!)OMi~'iUM 11' CJTCHOG'Jr:. PLCN"E EEC!STER MY OBJECTIONS WITH /.90'~ AL' ~"V~R"vn'T'L AU-HOR'-'-c "',-,. "~""'''OL OVER T ., LUV C..'.'~"d. I. ..J'C0"'.''''..'-'...... THEPROJEC,. /" ~ .r:1'- ~ 1'7 /' /'.~, --!-C /j-::r.ur..0...f.."iL_A--~~~~:...-- _ SiG~Aruat. "'I SiGNATURE-2 ,'it ~j~'USS Kc.therinc i. L:iscdle /.,;"' ,:.;r Box ~0l2 NAME (PRINT) t' '.~ Mattituck, NY 11952 ZIP y:. I DI,) NOT KNOW "BOUT THE TOWN tlOA'm REZONING THE PROPERTY pmOR TO RECEIViNG NOTICE mOM s.o.s. t. -~"".ll.'. ~... 'Ii" ' 'J~Ji;; . I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOE THE 160 UNIT SEACROFTli!' CONDOMI:';IUM iN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGiSTER MY OBJECTiONS WITH ALL", GOVER!'iM:::D'IL ~U::10R;T:ES \.I!"i'H CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. _U.u#-.f:-..d;..')'r-*<__. / ~...... :;L~I'J.\ l; li:\}- .1 -"Roh.z:?7:-L__~Lr/1 r,-J._ :'\1\:.'.1: ll'r';;f\,TI t,;- NAME (PRINT) . 1) y;~ j j ., Aj1)r~"'o 11_~.J-LQ.&0~~L'_~:"'-CM.il.'I-----AJ...L.J.L'9~ Am)R'Ess J./ ZiP 'l!.l \\oS. ...~ ,~t:.;..... '.~. ~h, fi!j~ c)'' . 6 "I,,€, SIGNATURE "'2 .%--.; DID NaT KNOW {I,BOUT THE TOWN BOt,RD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVe,G NOTICE FROM S.O.S", . r','j, {~~J ,{~~ .,,~ Ii. v <it~ l"1. .: ::~<';:',', :_:::.;.~ ('W'O ~....""..'?t.{J lAM OPPOSED TO CURRENT P:"ANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACRaFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEi\SE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. _titv..J..:,J.!....i__LkJL".d/ _.:~1~~:f -<J,,~ _ M_~~~_~~ ~IG~~~~.:~~_(~________ _!'~~.!_itd S~6;;R;~ V - NA,"'IE ;Pi"-:lN,i '.;~'.~xTlN tn~ci j':;':'-:t:T G.I\p.~t::.~ME (PRINTi __.~_~ ~_.'__.L.. ~ '-' ~..1Q.511 ;.~~~ft;tv:,i..:. N.Y. 'J ~ 952 ZIP ADDHESS o I D)D NOT ~NOW ABOUT THE TOW,,; BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECE1V;:\G NOTICE Ff{CM s.o.s. .... .~~ /,?''''''1, .rJ!"!:J It;;) ~\il.."'." !,'1 ";. '(S... .~>> M,'i! ~-"'.'!3 ~'O~$_1\'Ji -, I AM OPPOSED TO. CURRENT PLANS FOr: THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE PLE..\SE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL (~OVERNM~r:.NT L AU,'Ho;mIES W.~H CO:,TROL OVER THE PROJECT. / .' ) ';', -J/~;,.1','"-'& c~.I/.L\',J;'.('!:-~_.. J' Si(iNA n,iRE "'1 , ''''? J J _~-.L~L.G~LL'}'" Q-.J:~L}C~~j~~ NA1'-fE (PRINTi "<)0 '"'" ~ e:::'" .- I~- -- -r v r l-C}.;> ..;;2~L( r t" "'.[~;L---;..j ----------.----------"'"' ADOj,ESS SIGNATUHE ""2 NAME WRINj) 11<:')-/ , ZIP ill ; DID NOT KNOW ABQUT THE TOWN BaAED REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO. RECEIVING NOTICE ::ROM S,O.S. - '...''''''. """"~' "'-.' . ":!;'" .~ {\', 0;",,1 ..., ,;l',\ ,:" I' (~~';:l ~Cti'~D~""'l\ll -.'t',\, . , { . '\ . .~ ~r : ':I~~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PUINS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEi.,Sc R"GISTER MY OBJ CTlONS WITH t~O;f:;'\~~~~S ",;TH ~RTR~VE;.R. ,- P~JECT. ~(lkJ-jf:K~f~L\~ _\~1.L~~_. ..- EJIc.1.t/lO'7?! t1dJZ/~, J11r1{ v..r~tiJL Nt., ME [PRINTljl .' /'J II C'. ,,\ /J---ii~.lfi<lINT) ~f j""-!l. r- 4,? -r. r- . '1",$,'71. . .'/ r. rl (-L' ~ t;~ L!.. ""'r~~ ~~"=_J{{2L.~_..:cf-j.<:.?A'1?2'''.t-;':fi>'--~/ ,...... uc l! I k_ ADCRESS ZIP ~OT Kl'IOW ABOUT THE TOWN ,',O.^."D REZQi'::NG ThE PROPERTY PR:OR TO RECEiVING NOTiCE FRO:vl S.O.S. ;-""' t:'''-:("''! r,.::r:n PLEAS:: i:l~rC) ~-,!'.J CC,\"T:-:;BUT:n:-s 70 S.O.s. / To S.OtS. . t I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE LEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHO IES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. . <2.. SIGNATURE .2 VJ AL 11i"1i NAME (PRINT) NAME (PRINll y)O EI, "'W:Jq:) ?Jell/G' C vl'C-','c'I.(/i. ADDRESS ^./ ,) ZIP -po ;3/))( I 3':( Ctlr'ilo~ I' ~ I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. - ----- ---- ----~-_.- --- To S.O.S. 1 I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. -.b/u c.t d fi-.u......d' C~) I SIGNATURE"'1 SIGNATURE "'2 .l=.'rq\lfJ4L.. Cr.'R-Mue, {So NAME (PRINT) is,,,,,, l'-t C''''\<'"Ih'T ADDRESS NAME (RRINT) (( '1 j- ') ZIP [iJ I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. " ' , ....~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT COmO~MINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJ.ECTIONS WITH AL 0 RNME~~S WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. . 'u... ~. ~{t ~\.~04.bC\Q}~ \lJ\\ ,. SIGN!lTURE ~ I () ~GNATURt. ( - "b ~y 0 ~\ csJQ..y- ,~'- , '. _> ~J~ / ~ . NAME {P!"NTI An f.h\k NAME (PRINT) /1 :.\~f--.r""," J \' \il.iJNJYI41'- ((y,lO ADDRESS ZIP WI DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. ~~~'G~ :~,: ~S FOR THE ''0 UN" SEACROIT1 ALL GOVERNMENT~~Tii1r~~~~T~~E~TiHR~g~i~~tciv~~Ji~l'~~gJ~~~H -,- SIGNATURE'I f-...u.'4f. III ~.t1'';'1.. c",\ r< L r- R SIGNATURE '2 - 'NAME,::":,fdLt:DEt(' ENlj) "'1. RO"'rrfL~l>E.tC 190 () (', '" E: 7'"1('.. C C. p:-.. NAME (PRINT) ADDRESS ,...... c'trrct-iUqVE Ily".... liP r. S.O.S. _~ ~~~g6~~~~~ T~ gu RRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT ':~.' ALL GO~RNMENT ;i1r~~~~T~~E~TiHRCEOGN/STTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH , ~ R ?VER THf PROJECT. ~ ~~~I /lA-e ~ ./'~n2{,-1c:. _c., LYon.-) SIGN RE'2 NAMEI/'iiiNT) l-INl)4 /11. LI{bN5 . 2~ 3 6 2-c. fl- S"r AI-c / NAME (PRINT) ~--- ,7, C':" /O~/" Ate:, _ M. " . AnDRESS / ,~ 'L6oLrP Or,,~ /Ifrl- liP o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOW PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FRO:'; ~.~~.D REZONING THE PROPERTY ~ EONCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO S 0 S $50 0 $25 . . . To S.OfS. . -t ' , ..!U . I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERi'lMENIAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OV R THE P~OJECT <:::: "'-- -:> I /., .t; j,' -~S<; '" .t '\ j-C---..r,\~'i:'>.. .{ fr,Jc'{rCi SIGNAWRE "1 SIGNATURE "2 EU.&f N~ i". 1:3~)lh~ ~'O....~ Jane t30LtVL- NAME (F'RINTI NAME (PRINll ~'::"QC:'~" <"~,,",!.o;. 'R-nc':, C..+c.h~ (6 \\C\3s ADDRESS lIP [u/rDID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY pRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM 5,0.5. ~. _.- ---._- ._--~- To S.O.S. -...., 'if' I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL ?OYE::M~,~.~A~ AUTHORITIES WITH CO~ROL OVER ~HE PROJECT. W__~I . (.).'-7 ' fl~u )rr"" ~t-- SI~ruRE "I r - . "') SIGNATURE"2 L;/'7;!{'/!. #- c.';:/rc/:..'Y ("e/Jc F ~ <". /2 E.It '-/ NAME (PRINTI I' NAME ( INn "/ /'i /'ro.. 11t/. C.. r::P.'f"~ . >:'./1-r1f e ADDRESS /'-' r /;.)J ",'/ ZIP ~ DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY fRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. -t " - : : .!U I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL G~VERNM(~~ AU~HORITIES WITH CON~L OVER 3Ji'1 PROJECT.. ~,.,L_- - . ~".:L_ L{J2AuL l/..fU-<<-L t -)' ~lt.N^lllICl."1 SlLiNAIUHt'2 ---:- , .~.~ - -? ~ - >;//:#:...:Jf,.-..e'~ / r "'- ".5",/ .1(/.:-,.,r,,4-'/ ~ ,(,/?.:s~/ NAME IPRINTI NAME IPRINTI /?,,<J. ,d~c,( ."""r .ev'-~/~'~v-f ~ //,9././- ADDRESS ZIP p'" DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. ~: ~:.~ :~,: PCANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT t CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ~,o I.I""",.~~ I~ I~~~ \ SIGNATURE "'I GNATURE "'2 J!lo r< A. l-\-"~~..k...r~ I\\af. n. ~."..'''nj ~ NAME (PAIN \ NAME (PRINT) S(h..l I~c. Roo". p.O. Sa> 38' ('" I-1:I,.j"'" . 11-4 11'13-> AnDRESS -;J ZIP ToS 0 S -t.. . . . . . I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT . .. ,!U CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ~;:~:~71~SWITH~~~VERTHEPR ECT. ~ SIGNATURE'! . L .,. SIGNATURE" ' e ~ 11 III 1- '/1I(..L.. ..1J:.-1IM <.("...J L v ~ G..,~E (PRINT) NAME (PRINfl _ -~. - Af,~ /I~ 3~ - -. -- -- ---.......~ . o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. vA ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO 50S /)" n $50 0 $25 . . . ZIP ,:: ~:'~!:T PLANS COR THE /60 UN" S~ROIT ., CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT . ~~fl~ug_ --11.~ J11JtT";,/'l,z^'lj - SIGNATIJRE"'1 (j SIGNATURE.2 _ . --I1Ap.,'I~ '{::f\Ilu~I'- 4;'.//1/'; 1lf(/Lf>;:rfl1 "- NAMf: (PRINTI NAME (PRINT) .5 /~OJ'e..~IIil3...Uv-e. &fLtCjlQ<1.l.Le II,!~ l-l ADDRESS d lH 1\,,(/; DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FRQr-i S.O.S. To S.O.S. ~ 'if?" I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALLJ10V- RNMENTA~THORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. - -~LA . SIGNATIJRE"'1 SIGNATURE'2 P""L C. l?'J,t~ NAME (PRINT) Sill) /0).""<4 "";"""""",/#(1.,, ]1'; J: ADDBESS D",.."",,,,,,, , IV,. NAME (PRINl1 II'hl ZIP To S.O.S. -~.'.; ':tJ' I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALLa.?VERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ~~~ . 6SIGN'T!E ". SIGNAWRE.2 .G:-~Oa~L:L/1c..A])AM 5 . NAME (PRINT) NAME fPRINn -So. /J TN t2 L12 N. Y.' ADDRESS / II? 7/. . ZIP ~ DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. ., I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORWEr. WITH,CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. G~~- L'I~'- ~t~ ~~ I SIGNATIJRE" , Eslelle Cole P.O. 80. &3 GLADYS Eo COLE OLE Fairway Drive P.O. SOX 63 ALFREDA C63 CUlchogue. NY 11935 CUTCHOGUE. NY 11935 P.O.'OX ,., ~ CUTCHOGUE, HY 11935 '::?2. " { . c: ADDRESS , (.~ ,'-'._1/0 . 1 ZIP #I. DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZ~~ING T~E PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. ,::!:~ :!: PLANS FOR THE /60 UN" SEACROIT ., CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ~L ENTAL AtnH~R/TJES WITH ::T;~~ ~~ER THE =~ 00-;):3 ~ATIJRE ~I SIGNA~2 ~W . /7//S'k .;;;e. .JS'Orh"02 m',~K-a.. 6~......... NAME fP.RINl) NAME (PRINl) aoD~et",cr.;;,4LN. ~.-? 7~J/Z-4_ //~~ AnDRESS _ _ ZIP o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM 5 0 5 "'0 I 'ce, . I I . . . - /' I rccv,d. ,n a?Q, o ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO 5 0 5 o $50 0 $25 . . .tJ71. -.?/..:1a? ~ c/"-<f a lie".. nf/1-- To S.8.S. . -, I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT '. " CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL 'YT~2RITIES WITH CON,TROL OVER THE~RO::CT, t~~ Jt/,(?~/f/~~1t-f --(~N~TUR{;2 I~ l7{~/)~~';3 10 ;;?"<AA~T ----b/;'rNi'lA/ jJ JJ'/iJflAlT Il NAME IPRINn 4_ N ME IP:~~ !,y..{' I t;l~-'7' (l,1.4rTi n<.:: K /r~!/U~"55- ~//lt'n770C.l( . AD RESS Ilif .tr.?- ZI'II~Z. 111 DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FR2M S.O.S. _._ To S.O.S. -t I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT '. " , CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ~LL . VER,;'MENTAL AUTHO ITIES WITH CONTROLOVo/~:::O~~~~ ~ ~~~NATUr.' I - SIGNAWRE "'2 ,GQ. .{d~_a.... /) U- ...if..E L - rHo itS EN:. - NAMElPRINn /1 :.2-" '-----~NtZ;~X_7,. '4 1_.Lf_J.-;).. -~ - TliP To S.O.S. -.~ 'if' I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT, /&-"1/',.,0 ~-"'~ '~--" ~~--0 -~. '..1-' SI(;NIlTURE' . --- SIGNATUR~ '3-J I ".j'tJ.'7A4t/ If tI --:.l&(.eC J-TrX . ';;:;' NAME IPRINTI V NAME (PRINTI . 1./ ,.. ~r-yv1.-C I Y!' Y . - rF..e ~4VIA . '-'0 h. Y- J II f ff ADDRESS / ~ ZIP - - - -- ---- ---- To S.O.S. .t / , ,!i> I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEA CROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH A~~OVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT, aL~ R SIGNATURE "" SIGNATURE "'2 l1rJr f?- S. El-r2- Ere Ar - NAME (PRINT) J Vt~1<-_CutkT~/A jJ 0Ji!l..-3./ ADDRESS:-----~?I~ 7- NAME IPRINn f1l' I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. ZIP '. - ---------- - -- ,:: ~SE~ ::!:TPUlNS fOR THEl60 UNIT SEACROFT -t CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE RE~IST. R MY OBJEC NS WITH AL~OVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CON7YL @VJ9\T f ROJE , <-41l /?7~~ ~ - . ( SIGNATIJRE -I - - SIGN TURE #2 l:..t e,:" M<:CA~...'J.J ~t...l\e\ 1i'I'1<Cull 1"\ ..N'l - NAME /PRINT) NAME fPRINn -"" t.S.:5 /'/c:.((/,.;;<,-.S" ,,^-I (\...rr:hCl:1l.\.-( N'-I 11'l3S- ADDRESS \ , ZIP t\l' I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. f] ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO S 0 S o $50 0 $25 . . . To S.8.S. . -t . . , ~ ,. .. f I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. , NAME (PRINT) WILLIAM TUfHlLL GEN DELIVERY ORIENT. N.Y. 11951 SIGNATURE '2 SIGNAruRE'1 NAME lPRINT) ADDRESS ZIP To S.O.S. t I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ~~) a. .M,,-~ SIGNATURE'I VIe TOeut -4-. SL.f~ J>r . N~E (PRINn f3FS' VI1/VST7JN f!D . ADDRESS ~ U7c.#<J G vE o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. SIGNATURE '2 NAME fPRINn liP To S.O.S. -," " .' . . I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. .~~.~~'*'~ U~ kn0e- ~ SIGNAruRE'I. SIGNATURE"2 , .f4UtJf/ "" If,r di \) ~ C\. nQ.. k (' \.L \~ NAME (PRINn NAME (PRINT) 7{.<t5'. 4'.-rw<;o~ t"" rid~"--<...."LI~' , AmfREss . liP J\ n ) ~ID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOW BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FRQ 8.0.S. To S.O.S. -t . . , :'.. ..lo ( I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGIST MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CON LOVER THfi OJECT :l/d~~ IJ.~ '.. /7/ . SIGNA ruRE II J t:0 /'/',4/"1. :.J>, CA 70 NAME (PRINT) :<6{)~ e/:{w,v L,tl/V]) tA/V~ ~S'd C'(/7'~'60~RESS X I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZO PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. ~lVY /)'f?9y G THE PROPERTY ToS 0 S -,- . . . . ~~~g;~~~~~ T~ ~~:RENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT .: " : ffi:1J~ ;tir~~~~T~~E~Ti~R~g~i~~L~V~~J~~II~:gJ~b~H ~ - SiGNATURE,R . ~ (;:. 0 'l" SIGNA RE '2 - -~;;;'~Q_ah.Slt.t ....(1... NAME IPRIN /J NAME IPRINT) 3'4... ~"..."'''~~~~ss ~.-"'1~,~-r---1''tS8' lIP o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT TH PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTlci ~~~~ ~.~~;.D REZONING THE PROPERTY o ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO 80S o $50 0 $25 . . . :0" !:~~:HlANS roR THE I" UNIT5~Ron' CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ~L GOVeRNMENT~L AUrRITIES WITH CON;:OL OVER ,!HE PR~J~CT. ttb<~tf1~' ?7f X{,~::~~ .1/. : (2t.'lu. . -' eJHL~...JL\-- ~L~ITl.f J-I~'./I-'''''.r\ I - NAME lfRINl) I NAME (PRINTI ,.-- \,....'1~-~"-a.LlA&J~~_&sLtJ..- -L~ 111'",; ~ -).- .. U ADORESS ~ ZIP ~D1D NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. - ---.- - To S.O.S. -, , : :!\- I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AU'!;HORITIES WITH CgNTROL OVER T~ROJECT. Cdt..--n~-l. j/. ./;;..<!fu........ ~J~ ~~V\. _n SIGNATURE" 1 V SIGNATURE "2 cf'~:} k/, 1/' L a.x J,'" e-"'J , A .vy, . I-A N G N r=R NAME IPRI I NAME IK. ((,;=L; .c;i.. - c,/rclr0JL~G..&'9-J.!... / ADDRESS {j ZIP/It..?:!" ~D1D NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. .,d _ _.-<\ To S.O.S. -'~". i '~r I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTRgL OVER THE PROJECT, ( 4. J, r:t ,j /) I a')t..--~t"Z1.-,.,...r~-t;, ~N.- C!~.,P..v.J_~ t1.W-, "1-{' t'6.lh..ro L. ~ .' _ . S1GNA~RE" c'--:.t..:- ~ co.l'- {ff.c ~f'uR~il~L' ~ fh".R,;,L...qr-Jh..&u e. ~/f:!;". ~~JIJ..L.'J?'" :k-u..?f,.. ~.L' .. NAME (PRINT) AME (PRINT) ; ., 3.';Sk..&:,fiJ '-'Ut /C ,..1--"" - :k-"- ~...<.-s...;<_Zh.<r_.c r. ~l ' -I\QDRfrS C~~Qi2_'-L. C-07lA tiEL. ZIP L...l.c C'Hl>rJu...::..., )\.,L, - ---------, --.----____h____ __ ____._.__ ___,. To S.O.S. -,..... ".. .. . f I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. d..~Z?r,',"~7~ . .. lor~ SIGNATl?Rl"'l , SIGNATURE"'2 ( i y,d" L M.oJnflt'Y I NAME IPRIND. NAME IPRlrfTJ '/f'.'1f<; (--l"7 9(/ %0-) ....:th/ZZ?t:ldr:::L~~(tiAAt:j(1 J ADORE /9',ju--- ty10lD NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. ~:::!:~ :~: PlANS 'DR TilE I" UNIT SEACRoert CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. 7;~ ...&,L<.)"'.A:e;;~,~J. t7 SI(~NAnJRE"'. 0 . -~---~'--~ SIGNATURE"'2 N..i1rY..c..y'_.S.A(,) P,S-t'j "1/\ W', C.L NAME lPRINn ~..1S~ C',TC'h",'lu e \J ADDRESS \j lIP ~ ~ DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. o ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO S 0 S o $50 0 $25 . . . NAME IPRINTI To S.O!S. . -t . , , 1 . . '" -... . I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GO~ENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ~ ~ -j:;&;;~:r:: ~A. ~4~-p;f),J .:6 NAME (PRINn NAME (PRINT) /?,v/FW-C1.&.;';a. A, .L.~~ vE / 73.J~ AD~~ ZIP ~ I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. -, I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUT ORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ~-MQ..lUOQti . SI(,NATIIRF'1 ~ BARBARA M. HAINES ' '. / MOORES IANI: ".,,- a.m;u<M;UE. ".Y. 11935 SIGNATURE "2 NAME (PRINl) I-\IJIJnl:.~ ZIP fit I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. --_.- - To S.O.S. -~ ~~~g6~?JrG~ TZ 2~RRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEA CROFT ''" ALL 3SJYERNMENTAL Ti~"o~~i-~~E~TiHR2g~TTREORLMY OBJECTIONS WITH /~~.~ H OVER THE PROJECT. 11 SIGNAruRE'~ . . ARllifJNr- tv. 'I SIGNATURE '2 g NAME rPRINn .f=7 (O'f. ~ 'I \ 0 R' I FY-JT N ~ tMEfI'RINn ADDRESS , .i.i ') +- ~ & '("'I DID NOT KNOW ABO PRIOR TO RECEIVING ~"b+I~~ ~~~~ ~.~~~.D REZONING THE PROPERTY 'TOS.O.S. -to ", I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PL . . . CONDOMINIUM IN CUTC ANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT': " ALL( GOVER.N.. MENTAL .AiJ.? H"o~~i-~~E~TiHREgINSTTEORLMY OB~C'T'iON,s WITH '17 . r) ') OVER THE PRjJJ CT. () 1. ~r- \~ Ikr~ t ^O.. --=- ~/ I n ",\ SIGNA11JRE.( ,,- '. .J{ ~1 ..... '- Q,..J:.tl is )'\'. (' SIGNA11JRE '2 'f-'-L -- --" 'f-n..~ (",...t'o",..) F --r=- _ ;) NAME fPRINn ~ '<~"h1L""S--<'1 <?Q<- f C> II f) n I? NAMEfPRINn . ..~ '..,__u.. r~.l,'t , ~"l~ l:Va ,,\1 'ff I ;) '" I II I U ADDRESS' -t+L'. . ,Ii _ _. Y.~ \" ZIP To S. O.S. ---~--~: I AM OPPOSED TO CURRE ~ CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCH~6~~ANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT 1J.f' ALeL rVERNMENTAL AUTHORli-~~E~TiHR2g~iER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ., . a ROL OVER THE PROJECT '-- - I 'f eNt1..4..er L ~' ~'n:.'1 d.llr",- N~<<er- f.Q {3 NAME fPRf~ ~,.kt &E '2 z/ = oX 'i'll - ( t h NAME fPRINn ...."( (Je. ADDRESS _u .. 'Io€. - N.'1. (/1 ~~f ~ID NOT KNOW ABOUT TH ZIP PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTlC~ ~~~~ :OARD REZONING THE PROPERTY o ENCLOSED PLEA .O.S. o $50 0 $25 SE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO S.O.S. - - To S.~.S. . -, I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. '", '1 , . j '-'(Ii].)L .....IUL1i.)6' JU .I .SIGNATURE.l J :ft i (\J .!J-h,,'/Y J( e I NAME (PRINT).., C ,I.,f,"l' 61.' 1....1J I.~O >< I =>"3 ' ...; n ' " ADDRESS ' SIGNATURE -2 NAME (PRINT) /'1(-',) ,-:::; ('- J To S.O.S. -, I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL. OVERN NTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. .4. - SIGNAT E '2 . i1/E NAME (PRINT) CI./f CrflOGt/E:, .u:Y. -ENS /193.~ 21P C SIPNl!'J!h <JY}yq & -: ~er;.s NAME (PRINT) /lASS/ill /JOINT IW. ADDRESS B1 DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. -, ' . :~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. obJ;,t!Jt- d. ~c)Qr SIG~ru~ ~ L'1J~ L. FL.efC~ NAME (PRINT) NAME fPRINT) Jf/~/oJCJg. 'P.ollJrJ '8oY.3!;j, lJeJ&'.sl.Jff.Q("/(;',~EW ADDRESS ' '~eIC! I~ 'or] I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. SIGNATURE -2 ,::!:~ ::!.: 'LANS FO' TH"OO U"'TSEAC'OFO -, CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GO~ERNMENTAL UTHORITIES WITH~EW~40JE~ - SIGNATURE '). SIGNATURE '2 ~ t:LJ Al!JpHL ~f!...!fc-Oss 05t!..I#?J '?, ~~<;.<;. "NA"MlWRINTI NAME (PRINT)- ..i'-1tt..AbLSP 'Pau/i ~tiQ. ~CJrt~'-o, A,..lt . {fi "'} / AnDRESS , 1/ lIP " ~ I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY .!r PRIOR_TO RECEIVING NOTICE FR()M S.O.S. ,:!:~ ::!:, 'LANS FO' THE '00 UNIT SEAC'OFT -, CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. '0a"4=,---(k"C'-~,~~ .eM<d,) If, /z'-l~ .~IGNAruRE.1 SIGNATURE'-2 ,J1.1(',0 c' to ~,.".s 8/F',('J/,tf.cLl k, .If'c:il3/IV 5 NAME /PRINT) NAME (PRINT) :, ; ,'1..0 ,I 1" " ~~DRESS (' <' Ii.. /(<'c; <" 6J;('cIf.5b I(J /<.tJ. (?L 71'/-/46{,.Y::; / /y..oJ _C> ZIP 1/9:l:5 JI( I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. o ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO S 0 S o $50 0 $25 . . . TOS O~ . -,.,.... f . ';~. '. - HE 160 UNIT SEACROFT .: .. I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR T Y OBJECTIONS WITH CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGOUREIT'I Pg~TiHR~g~i~~LM OVER THE PROJECT. ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTH \l . Y 6- V /'1& ~ERbl:Rt LO-';/ J l-I L/.4 r 0 u SIGNATIJRE '2 SK~NA TURE "1 NAME (PRINT] 1/'13'5 ZIP NAME (PRINl) .1\) .J( / f-{ c-j:. fL 4- -- ADDRESS To S.O.S. t I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT .: .' CDNDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PR~JECT. - 'Y" ," .JJ;:' '" Z 01 , t /;" t!.:._#.Lt:'I?r! /. :(""("1" t..' H1T.(,'R(' . (;,'1-<",/<<.:/ ( ~ . ( SIGNA 'WRf "1 . ' c,; SIGNATURE 2 /'/1 Ie 'IU' .-:6t>1r,~~ ~~ ft."Z.,4.8Cl~1f. C!/?Mp~r~L. " ->..- NAME PRINT). . NAME (PRINT) . ~ . . /( '.' .' IE) f! oL): V. IV'" '" t)"FFO/...fo' h iJ J~ "~. , . /. "-' .JL'- '. ZIP ,'flS( I ADDRESS / ~ '-" ;Ij I DlD-'NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. , o CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT .~: ..' N CUTCH UE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH NTAL AU H RITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. GNA TURE "1 J . . rr-- 6J..I.J:U t 11 ~;MX;~(D~tet\ \, NY. AOOR'ESS , )(1 DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. SIGNATURE "2 NAME fPRINTl . ZIP ---..-- --- --- - -- - - - --.-_0_' ............. _....... .... -.. L"O _ To S.O.S. -, -I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ~~ A.lJ:.h~ ~7~NAruRE "1 EI.....a.h~~Jla.I'I~ NAME 1P1lINT) NAME IPRINT) J1OAL~.4n ~ 1!JD-t "~--1!b.teAP_U'ILr-H. I ~ IJ F ~""~ ADDRESS , U --,..... ZIP SIGNATURE "2 &1' DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. -, I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ;//~?: ::<~~L.e. L2~ &~':"o.~"J-L/' !.f.cJy, SIGNA1URE "I SIGNATURE "'2 .. I C/'/;?t.. ~ ELI1.,/UE I/Jich,,/s NAME (PHIND _ NAME IPRIND H fl rt;7<<d;: ...a;,. .{"lfoUv..,,o,J ;'d~/Nrnlrtd:_ L/Jo!> it- SS'b V-'o/lu..hIJ LII. 1v(~t'151. ADDRESS liP ,r I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. U ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO S.O.S. o $SO U $25 To S.O!S. . -9 I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT . .:~~ CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ~ GOVERNM~L AUTHORITIES WITH C;::TROL OVER THE PROJECr. ~~'N~~) ~S~A~U~E~ J.lfiVl/',3,.JC" :. ~oo b $O,lJ V!Ot.!:7 ~QODSD P :"') J'AME (PRINT) ?o K,,}J .5'"..s"SME (PRINT) .~ o r.>c' 550...., . ~ ~I .J'~ n' .Vy7<r- /y't<ti:L",IVJ':)_"'''fl'b 1'~5 /ftGI./LAN.n lO P _ .ADDRESS /'" I /' "f.J <lJ .... ZIP ('v ,':'rioG <.1,: ,,/oJ 'j1l13J lU '-IOov'I.lVY II I " To S.O.S. ...,'; .'~'( I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. 'r 'I \...l..LLA.\... u...u L \, eLl. \~, l':. \. ~GNA ruR~ -I .- 1'1 II ('; i/.l .". 'Jl./l'I/fl- L NAME (PRI~n ~. SIGNATURE "2 NAME (PRINT) ADDRESS ZIP To S.O.S. -, ' , . '.~ ~ NAME IPRINTI -'lAtH L r= (;.I'LLA T H 1114 ) ZIP ..------------ ----- . - ___ "'0 _ ._.__ __ ___.. .__ .__.... ToS.O.S. OPPo5et:(-Lt~::?/-. I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT'SEA;;;FT "" CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH AL GOVERNJ'l.!'NTAL AU~ORI IES WIT!1 CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. . -t cLcck";Jo 1L~ . SIO'TIJRE 'I. ct-rbcLfd~~'C. (l NAME I~ (' ~ I NAME (PRINT) Q _~ cJ fA~~l C) I q L ~ t1 Lj ~ 1/ iP ')1 -r1 DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY LJ( PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. Ka.1lJmt_i~__ /jJ SI~E.1 ___~'--4.... .elJ_ 11. :-1-. NAME tPRINTI WUJ/'IoJ.; A1 -'1 It ~ S 7 ~~s SIGNATURE "2 ,:: !:~:!: ~S FOR 'HE I" UNIT SEACROFTt COND MINIUM IN HOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH VERNM A~~ITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. -~ ~~-/C2~ Ie; TUR 11 SIGNATURE-2 ~A..M. Q$7::j ~~O C.4..e"t /l. CoStellOl NAME fPRINTI .LJ NAME IPRINT) -PP. ~.. 'X ~.1.!L r€CO.NIt~. .Ny ,'9.J-8 ADDRESS ZIP ~ I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. o ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO 5 0 5 o $50 0 $25 . . . 1 ~~Fgg~~~~J~T~~:;g~;X~~:~1JJ~g*J~~~~~~~~I~~gJ~~~H ,:->. /' ~r - J _ ......- I t {\tv~I',/ f'v\o--v ~-~ - M 155 PAULA <150 ,#P. O. BOX qS-E . "CUTCHQGUE NY llq35 . ,?-=- .......... .......... ....~ft......... '" - -I:"--, ~ ZIP /~tt ~iD ~On~~~ 2Jb6\-1~ ~WN BibARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTIS:;E FF()M s.. Q,--S.. . . . ,:: ~~ :~,: PLANS FOR THE "0 UNIT SEACROfT -, CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT ~_'(h ,(,,;2.--1:... . SIGNA lURE "1 ..A/;k! kALoSt:,' / NAME IPRINTI Q fc./J ') e.t 1.1 II<jjJ ~ ~1 0 1..1 A6oRES'1' To S.O~. . SIGNATURE "2 NAME (PRINT) SIGNATURE "2 NAME (PRINT) ZIP To S.O.S. -.,., .", I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUT ORITIES WITH CONT OL OVER THE PROJECT, SIGNA E" SIGNATURE"2 ..1?flf . chi !IEy _O~.ALO E. Scl-/;/lcy NA)1\ f~IN~ I NAME fPRINn f.,Y()L~:>",e. 1\cf, Lt.}. frJ.OCI'u...L -0 <5p-;., ( ADDRESS J ZIP l6 I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. -, I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. 2:.\; L"), ('1'1. \ -$ ~n b c:. \< SIGNATURE "l Mrs, G. Wm. LrmbKk II 830 D~oot P.th P. O. Bo. 6180 Ca1mokue. NY 119J~ SIGNATURE "2 NAME (PRINT) nuunL...... ZIP ~DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. _~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT . '''I ~4. g~:~::i~~~T.fG'T~~\n~fHRg;::;~~L",;V~:;'i"CP~"J"~g" .~ ~~h_O-l( SIGNATIJRE ...) SIGNATURE "2 - ~YPRINn 1// - ~3 (.. ~ (, it ~<-::J...7' d' 4 r-Y' j~p NAME (PRINT) AOORFS'C.-l ,( t L~~ ~ ZIP CJ ~~:gRN~6 ~~c?E1v:2~b+,~~ ~~~ :.~~.D REZONING THE PROPERTY o ENCLOSED f'LEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO" .s. o $50 Q"$25 . ,: ~,:~~: PlANS FOR 'HE '" UNIT S~ROfT' CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGi... fl:.R MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ,..JX... - '-4J? . s: _~ '- ~~ SIGNATURE "I SIGNATURE'2 ~~-,--_R-e_~tA~ '"' NAME (PRINTI NAME (PRINTI -'U.lLCne..L~~~q~ /1'r3S ADDRESS ZIP (2'l. I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. - -------.- To S.O.S. -t I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH A~L .90VERNI'1ENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. &at'~ c~);?;;;;':)~e-- __t'k~ J?t~u (,l / SIGNATURE "I SIGNATURE'2 c-P~~~ L. $?fE,z ELr"#/Y&.e /:?:7PSER NAME fPR1Nn.......-? /' - NAME (PRINT) Z?I!iX~~('C<'~&cJ.;;.RL" /S/.Y //:7..3'./- ADDRESS /' " ZIP ~ DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECE!YIN9-.1'1()TICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. . , I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTj-fORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. !: . ~d/ /&.f (~QauLJ<V -;(~ r6 -JuA.t.. / ,.. SIGNATURE "I '7 /) SIGNATURE "2 1.::-, CI/;(!LL PVJ/...L..!../S --La.ajU2" 1'Z3'<-~/eJ- NAME IPRINTI NAME (PRINT) . nOI ,r~ Fc.'\f<N~"elDJ- Cdc..Ly'-4'./Y.y /1'13~ ADDRESS liP )( I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY ~OR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. t..... -- .- . , , I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. 00 SIGNATURE "I "-- SIGNATIJRE "2 re,:s ' ReI: e.~ " NAME (PRINTI J . NAME (PRINT) qJJ-;tJ' Ajt<;'\j'l./ INN! KOA-eP /?T/ / ADORES C L(7C,./fOC; i.( e ZIP rr.Yi DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY )lRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. -, , ' ....~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CEN~OMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH A~-=OVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT, !~- ,6-~_.._Jl~-.-- SIGNATURE -I SIGNATURE-2 aA..~&!-<!Jt l-I:. r:,=L_~ 1/ K'"V'~ Howell Farm South Harbor Road Soul hold. long Island New York 11971 NAME IPRINn ZIP .It I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. o ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO S.O.S. n "''''''n ..---. .,.",... -, , , :~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT . . CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT ~ ~/.. SIGNA nJRE 'I To S.c1.S. MAY 2 .84 . . SIGNATURE '2 1~J.TE~r.I~ttrft1ENE NASS/l,U POINT rOAD -~---L:U1OHOGUE. R y. 11935 o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD R~ZONING THE PR/OP~~TY PRIOR TO R(;cCI'J~t1G..NO'I'~~. if?/;"LONI-'b ate. 5/ NAME IPRINT! ZIP ,:: ~:.~~: PLANS FORTH' 1" UN'H'ACROIT -, CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOYERNMENTAL A THORITI!"S WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. -?-hf'>.lr,.- €, cert. ShL.,t:-~_~ fJ, &,? ~ SIGNATURE'I SIGNATURE'2 . Tf/t{1 ~ \' C l-=t c.flT N/\Au-:: D, t:fr II., NAME lPRIND NAME IPRINT! /<'7,'- Sh-:iJl/1r L/).. CuTC/ler-tlE !f'i'~$-- ADDRESS . lIP ~ I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. -t ' . , ':~"" ~ I I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT, ~ .11 '<.:Lv-.. L... ..s~Cl SIGNATURE.f), SIGNATURE'2 Luill..l.Q\.l"'- L. ~bc$ NAME (PRINT) .r NAME IPRINn ' V 0 130'1 ?- ~() (u-f (,..b...z,~e tV '( AnDRESS ~ t II 7..3:; ZIP o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. ,:: ~:,~ ::!: PlANseORTHEI" UN" SEACROITt CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ~, ' GOVERN MEN TAtp1JTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. . ?t-iL-{{t~ - JU~.\.4Y""" ./_-!---' '\)... "...J- SIG AnJRE #1 SIGNATURE'2 -DA~t=4-N S4L.YY1oN t'/ NAME (PRINT) 0 NAME IPRINT! ~~i!-W:s<; T Cv Vt 1"-,U. C V l' c... ~ESt, J 2:. , N 'I - J /1 $ ZIP Iil I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. -.~,.,.! '~! I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE, PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH Ah ~VV~~NM~NTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL 0 THE PROJECT. ~_<:Po1;:;::: <V r . \ I SIGNATUR~ SIG~TURE "2 - -_\LVI I I A-tt eretls 'JE'r-w .l--'EIER:S J / n - Pi""E IPRI'r,) I (' +-Ii- . NAME (PRIND <O.Q.l>._~}A 'jI~ :'&4----WUt~ -. ;d8.m t:- AnDRESS -"-rJ.-'" ZIP [] I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING'll"" PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM Sn.8. [J ENCLOSED PLEA SF FINn MV rrWTr"", '~'"'' ___ _ To S. ff.s. '" UNIT :'c.on 1 I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE Y OBJECTIONS WITH CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE R~g~T~~ OVER PROJECT. AL VERNMENTAL. THORITIES WITH () <<~' SI TUR" S%G TURE "I .- /' r 'OS /J/if(;(.H1' Go r -(.IDS bEoR Gee 7T l..,Ol. .//v NAMEIPRIN11 NAMEIPRINT) r N y /19..5-c, ;;I'iSo GreAnlLvollt. tf'ollD, N~w ..)vtt:"JCquc, ',' ZIP ADDRESS lifl DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. '.. ,:: ~:SE~ ::!: nANS CO. TII"" U"'TSCAC'OIT 1 CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ~ \J~' - ~--- srGNAnIRE "1 G.A/1..... 'i\ c ~() ., I< \ ---~~ NAME {PRINT) ,q"'-. ,,_0'\~,.'L'l...l,.\\ L<.... c...LJ.-~~v.. . (0,-<, . . -7 ADDRESS SIGNATURE "2 NAME (PRINT) - \'ill ZIP 0"1 DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY JlRI9R T9.RECEIVING N~TICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. '1 , . ~:t.'- I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEA CROFT NDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH A G2VERY.J ~. NTAL ;'ldTHORITIES WITH CON~R. OL pVER T;~ a;?JECT ~ '.'f./r::oPt?~'--~'1J(LL. k((rtl1 4).,. / 1>{.'l<.v-' ( J 0 SI(;NAnJRE'1 -- .7:j SIGNATURE '2 .:J~~, f~f.-..-tiills..jb.L~""-k..' II'.I-:"'{ e 'r 1'-1 Ci 1\ j ,./ ha ~ 1 I NAME (PR~T) ;) \), NAME CPRINn 1'1 s.. j .'i.~." d a ( ,,-( l . .1, C' l< h l_~.c.,"'.",--J Lt..:5 J _ j AODRESS J liP ,:: !:~:~;, nANS FO, TH"60 UN'TSEAC'on' CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. .Cd.l'! U j'l,.i\' Lit Ll j - - SIGNAnJRE "I SIGNATURE "2 --Lk,j.!1..--.li-S."".' ~ o I NAME IPRINT) NAME ?N11 !(O~...Jl.,......x((~. C ~ J r Iu-xLlL....ALi. II B J ADDRESS 0' ZIP o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY ;PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. . -- ---------..-- -......... To S.O.S. _~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEA CROFT . ':'" CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ~~ GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CO~ROL OVER THE PROJECT. ~'tJd r~e~ ?~ (e.., ./c-;'G~A~re~" 1'LC In'1'~'1....I-...J3.P r8 en/' ~~__ T. Ac.=..... 1 3 . NAME IPRINTI ')i::7:(i 6...)'. (. I P . NAME fPRIN11 I'Y u. J er) -~/~/,/.e.h4-n:2 q,./ii'! /J--]q-7.t";t-. t: c.<~.f- t?//OL-, Af)6Rfss ZIP r= ~ o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. U ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO S.O.S. o $50 0 $25 .-6...., . ,'" I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT .. .' CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALrk' OVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES.WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. lM1.d ~<- fl~ , - - SIGtfA" I .. L . SIGNATURE 2 OL N IV I F- !3E.J--E.V~L'-::'1 NAME (PRINT) NAME (PRINT) \Pc.( f3~y J-..~S Pr.C-Oj/fC- ,Yfj-119-.;-f ~ DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVIN.G N9T~I~..EROM ~.O.S. To s.o.A. ZIP To S.O.S. -, ' , '..~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMIl:;IUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ,.) .' 4 ' ' jL~ " . / /c-_.. v....::-:://l:.-.. -'L'i~.il~ -r- ....SlGNATU'\" 'I ,,':J SK:;N^TUR~ '2 j /" ;/U/,,,,( . ....D.,PVe... V/Cl.C/U!) J / N~Mf (I'RINTI Ll . . NAM~ (PRINn L.=:.(:j]';.&-lYl V'" e.. 1'i..-'Lf.0::.Lfb:."yL~_L-j J, , y.... / / r 3.s- ADDRESS . 0 ZIP [J I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. J ______ To S.O.S. .., '-.. .' . c" .... I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL G?,;'fRNMENTAL AUT~ORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ~4-e a . ~--~--_....r __ S~6.lYl'~L- .. SIGNATURE .2 ..obert tN.on ml.ittleworttlLn s..CUftNY 11578 - J ;f NAME(PR~ '\, . _ - ~~ P(?2--~ ~,. G~..z-/"/U.a. V-- .~ ADDRESS;' ZIP 7l: / , 19 I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY /PRI9~!O R~CEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. , I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH J~~L G~VERN ENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH 7?NTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ~. 1i\I.c.-LQ C",""~'.~. ~---.~.. OiliLm y IG~l \'...MtIJ~llJtGNKRE'2'JMA("'L \Jj f\ '? NAME (PRINTI ~~'Y qNn \Y V /vi IN 11 <{ S () tJ 1J3l1. ADDRESS ZIP ~ID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TQ RECEIVINC;NOTlCE FROM S.O.S. ,::!:~ ::!: PLANS FOR THE '60 UNIT "ACROFT - t CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH 7iO"~~ERNs:E~~6T:,~.;/ THORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ( SIGNA lURE *2 .G . ;0/1 -€7T i II' '-- // NAME (PRINTJ .. /;"1 /i/~ NAME..!~INT) ~,:Y.) fr/.'"d-'../-, t.. /j "h:C(:....}/VIC_ /y. 1. .09-')1- X;/ C !\DDRbs -' ...... ) ;,f",//,/C'7' e",ovTP/;::'VT /17 / /i/J ///'{Er liP I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. U ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO 5 0 5 n $.sn n ~? . . . .-t. .' , I I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROIT . '~..- ~ CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ~::L~ ~ ~~>J~'~\ SIGNATIlRE -I ].ld1..@' 1\ Q '" ~. E- ~TI &.1-\ to.\J\~ NAME (PRINn ~..Cl_~'J' I",'; t'\......S,yH<>L" N '/ IIH"- ADDRESS ' To S.O.~. SIGNATURE .2 NAME IPRINl) liP To S.O.S. -~...'.'.., '~~r I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROIT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. -:- -~ ,. .1':;;:.- ~./-/,"'~ ;'....--<l/u....:I M ffr.i" . rV-'r2 SlGNAnJR~'1 &./ SIGNATURE '0 " -:; v '?7' Soptd. Adler P. O. 8.. 1481 Southold. NY 11971 ADDRESS .....-<- NAME (PRINT) liP J>I; I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. _.n__~n~ To S.O.S. -~ '~r I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROIT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ~ GOV RNME~TAL AUJ::RITIE~~ITH CON ROL OVE~ THE ROJEC SIGNATURE~} SIGNA URE '2 ST.ANLE" Y-:D~~:n~q.~.=lC:ri E1- . ~- NAME (PRINn NAME (PRINT) .1'190 -1f~IIJ...It(\JJ) - ~D ,?o .'l?l.;<- 9~ ADD~E~'-M"'c. I-k:le= ,<-.or ZlP./17.1~ " I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. ToS 0 S -t.. . . . . I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROIT :.!i> : ;f[';g~i':i~~iF'~,;"~=.'m"~~~~v~~Ji"C1)~g,~'~H _ . \~---<-~~~.duh /, ~ . /l ~GNAruR['1 - t4 , 1'\ OS :' -, SIGNATURE . ~-~[.. '- I }.Y\C h ,~ \if" (E... "' CJ NAME ""INTI I Y)') I r- '-' 0)("') _' . _ N ME (PRINT) 07.< ItL~1L1S LANE. CO urc hCJ2fJ!uc;, AJ. V ) / <;'...~~ ADDRESS - _-,' / J / liP To S.O.S. -~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROIT ".: ~?~gg~~~~~i~T~UTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WIT .:11 . AUTHORITIES WITH CON OVER THE PROJ . - SI AruRF.. -:J----. -.A.MJ (J[) --r--::.A SIGNATURE B ~AMEI INT) ~'H~V ~~i.J OX 2: S- !:W 4IFP' y ----'t::>J) ""(N~ I I AllO ESS ~ -'/. "2..ct ~ ~~:g:~J ~~g~vf~c?~~+I~~ ~~~~~~;.D~~N~~~~E~l [l'lS(" lJ ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO S 0 S o $50 0 $25 . . . ., I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTI ALL GOVERNMENTtJA~TH?~ITIES WIT NTROL OVER /AW/ ~I~i'~~~~- ~J;rr 1-. poU/...S"^, NAME (PRINT) t:tl QtlX 1'7~ ~ulcrl6O:UE;- / ~l'{. ADDRESS To S.O.I. 6i:."'Jl:TP.1J Pi:: l... Po v L sLJl\J NAME IPRIN11 It"! -.;, ZIP [!(J DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. - -.--- --- ---- -- -- --- To S.O.S. -, . , , I .~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL G VERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CQNTROL OVER THE PROJECT. /1 ~ ':~"'Uvu-....< J::.-t,~ SIGNAlURE'1 . " .. SIGNATURF'J e ti€$iC,7 I{ALo<;/f/ ("?ehevleve.. Ko/",<;kJ NAME (PRINT) NAME (PRINT} _ g V re.. I-I."J (If:.:" '--. I. RlJ ) I '1 ~.5. ADDRE~- /- ZIP To S.O.S. -~ ," I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT ~OND ~~~M IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL '0{:~MENTAL ~ORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. . c.:L.y_ ~Ar ~ Q. M(},,~o..V\ . SIGNATURE'1 SIGNATURE" NAME ~INT) W (\ \" ~, NAME IPRINl1 ~-~~~~~~. J\.\-\.\\~~.. ADDRESS " ZIP ,:: !-SE~ :~:T PlANS FOR lHEl60 UNIT SEACROIT -, CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. dA~? cC SIGNATIJRE ") [; NAME lPRINn C IAOO I \-\o~}: ~ ADDRESS SIGNATURE "2 ({q3~ ZIP IE" I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY .PRIORTO~ECEIVING NOTICE FROM..s.O.S. ---- ..----- ,::!:~ :~: PlANS FOR lHE 160 UNIT SEACROfT -, CONDOMINI\lM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS wiTH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. K.wu., ~~ SIGNA TIJRE 'I Kjlrlll~~N' CIlAAi/ffJt'-'ffA/ SIGNATURE "2 NAME (PRINT) /l.(). gO/( '1PU.fCV7I'c.,nf /J!i3g ADDRESS NAME (PRINTI ZIP o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. o ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO 50S o $50 0 $25 . . . . , ~:M!:~ :!E: PLANS FOR THE 1" UNIT 5EAC~ -, CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHO UE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ~ AUT RITIES WITH CONTROL OVER T P OJ CT. SIGNATURE *1 SIGNATURE.2 orrot'J 5chvLze. L"J.ea.-N(Jr 5~_hI.lLz.Q.. NAME (PRINT) NAME (PRINT} P,"')('516' 7 COUNTrY' CJ./I~ Dr. curcA""fue.llf. //"1.3..j- ADDRESS' ~ ' ZIP ~ I 010 NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. -...,......, .'~r I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ~ ~~ In.,.....(1 "i/..u.., U.A~a.-...- / SIGNjVRE'1 SIGNATURE't' J}1b ~aE" . C; "RA/-I,Q,., M,^n.,'f'f fit.,. ,.~ c.(lfl.b.~ NAME (PRINn NAME IPRINn lSoX 1'} /y/lSSAlJ 7', ;?e:f? E..o..}f ')1l1e(/?.. fir ~ ADORF:SS /. C ZIP _ .__~I.I"~IIC4.v~ /Y.'._II'l37 f<....,..~<-<-A- _ II~JI To S.O.S. -,. . . , : .:.~ I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOr::NTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ,...J1~ Co.- .0~L "f' H. C. 'fE'ttTUJIl; 'I.. SIGNATURE'2 ;:... . He, M.D. :.:. ) 2700 W^~rJ\RIVl; ; FAIRWAY FARMS " --cI1Tl;HUGUE, iftOV''fiJRK 1I93~ NAME fPRINl1 'ZIP To S.O.S. -, . . '.: .: I I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUT RITIES WITH C TROL OVE HE PROJECT. I ~~~ ~ GNAWRE -I. IGN~RE'2 CfU'<;rrJI'M1!.. Lu I S --r;fE..Qn~/UI C:,..vo;s o NAME"",PRINT) 1\ NAME (PRINT) 1:.../ I' .;l.s"o2o JJ'cEAt:' .j.J~IV P C VTc:..1{6 c..Uc IV. V 117J,[' ADDRESS ' I I ZIP {. I 010 NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. I _ _ ____ __._._ .._._. _.___.__ .~ _ To S.O.S. l' I ....... I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONI;>OMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ~'_ L0a~~ SIGNA TIJRE # k .,-,-: tv. . . (> e.1 e.. f- .~~ E' . f' 0 NAME (PRINT) tl' r 119~'t. o I 010 NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. o ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO S.O.S. o $50 0 $25 SIGNATURE .2 NAME (PRINT) ZIP To S.~.S. -. -1 . . 'd' ~ I . , I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. 1)1 ~~r ..t. E..,,_h_...... ",,~ jZ ~(3. ~ SIGNATURE'1 SIGNATURE'2 rVa"c'( F fncl....h1(u,l'"\ FRr-t~It... ~. f.N1)E."A",tJ NAME (PRI~ NAME (PRlNll i-fCf.s- EJq@t!t>', - r JT, . fl'B5 ADDRESS ZIP ~I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. -1 I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVE ENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CONT LOVER TH PROJEC .lll'e# To S.O.S. -1' '. . i . . .. I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WITH CON OL OVER THE PROJ CT. rv.--<.- <- SIGNATURE" 1 SIGNATURE '2 f <5T€ t'Jh en (1 ,Y.e.skb/Ju a~4el//eD-(' LpsktJlll f NAME~INT) / ......, NAME (PRINT) I\I<JIFI-/(/S4- /i-J'pbe;)5 /t9~.!: ADDRESS &<..--t.-c....L ZIP I o I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOAR;RE~~~~ THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. To S.O.S. -1....... . , ( . -: Jo I AM OPPOSED TO CURRENT PLANS FOR THE 160 UNIT SEACROFT CONDOMINIUM IN CUTCHOGUE. PLEASE REGISTER MY OBJECTIONS WITH A GOVE M TAL AUTHO ES WITH CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT. ;;.30 /!Alae SIGNATIJRE "'2 . lMJ;.lt<TJ . ~ ,,,,fAll' Q- ADORE NAME IPRINl] ZIP , I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO RECEIVING NOTICE FROM S.O.S. o ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND MY CONTRIBUTION TO S.O.S. o $50 0 $25 " , ~,. .... ! TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IEACRrT AT CUTCHOGUE ~ ENVI NMEN ..... ASSESSMENt' - PART~ ( .. '. , , PROJF.CT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE ",..al InfoM"ation (Read Carlfully) " In cc~pletfn9 thl form thl reyi~er should be ~"Ide. by the question: Have my de,islons and. determinations be.n re..onable? The r.yiewer Is not Ixpected to ~t an Ixpert environmental analy.t. .. . :.i.. .~:" . . ." Identifying tn.t an .f'act will be potentially lar;e (col~n Zl does not mean that it sloniflc.nt. Any large liilct mu.t be evaluated in ,AR7 3 to detlrmino sl.nlficance. .iiec: In column Z Sill'.ply uks that It be looked at further. . is also nectssarily ~y .Identifying an . " - Th. E....,les provided Ire :0 usist the reviewer by S"Ol1lng types of .ffects and wherever possible the thresh, of 1I'''9'ltuoe t~u would trl.ger I response In col,.", Z. The examples Ire generllly applicable throughout thl State and for most situations. But, for any seeclflc project or site other .xamples and/or lower thresholds aay be cere approprlata for a Potantlal Lar.e lep.c: reting. - Each project, on e.ch site. In each -locality, will vary. Therefor., the e..:nples have been offered as guldan, They do not constitute In axhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answ.r .ach question. - The nu-oer of examples per qutstion does not Indica:. the importance of tach question. INSTRUCTlOIIS (Read Carefully) I. Ans...r each of the 18 questions in PA~T Z. Ans_.r!!l If there will be any Iffect. b. ~ answers' should be considered as !!lans..ers. c. If answering Yes to I ouestion then check the .corcoriate box (column 1 or Z) to Indicate the potential size of the ;mcact. If Impact threshold equals or e."e.1s any ..a"'plt provided, check colu"," Z. If Impact will occur but threshold is l~"er than ex~ole, check column 1: d. If reviewer has doubt abou.t the size of the imp,,: ;!ltO, consider the Impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. ' . e. If a potentially lar~e i~pact or .ffect can be re~u:.. by a change in the project to a less tnan large ma.nitude, place a Ves In column 3. A Ho respo,s. indica:es th.t such. reduction Is not possible. 1 2. 3 1. WILL THE~E aE All EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL Ci'.A~:~E TO PROJECT SiTE? Exe~oles that ~ould Apply to Column 2 Aoy construction on slopes of IS: or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 feat of length), or where the general slopes in the project lrea exceed 10:. NO YES 00 . . . S~ALL TO POTE!lTlAL CAN I~PAC1 aE HOOE?.ATE LARr,E REDUCED ay lI~PACT I~'PACT PROJECT CllAlI~E - - - - - - - - - - - - - -L. -1L - - - - - - IHI'ACT ON LAND . Const~"cticn on Lend where the depth to the ..at" t.ble is less th.. 3 f..t. xx. Construction Of oaved ~arki"q !re~ ~or 1.~C' O~ ~C~ vehicles. Constrvcticn On land n~ere ~edroc~ is expos!~ Or i!r.e~!11y wi~nln 3 feet of eX1sting gro~nd suriac!. Ccns:ructi'=ln that ...,111 ccntinue for :T'oOre t!'lan 1 'Ie!!'" or involve more :~Jn c~e ~n3S. or sta~!. . [~cavation for mir.inq ,urposes t~a~ w~ulc r:~ve ~~~~ than 1.000 tons of natural ~:!r;at (i.t. reck or s~il) p~r y!a~. (ons:r~c:ion of anI new sani:ar~ lindfll1. -S- ~ ", "," . ' . ( -.. . _ Construction In I deslonated floodwlY, ..!- Othtr .llIl\lact.s: Construction i~pact due to scheduled com- pletlon wlthin +2.months of approval of condominium" proj"ct and ad~l tlonal impact due to construction. of propo"sed shoppln~ center. .'lO US Z. WILL TIIER~ BE AN EFFECT TO AllY UNIQUE OR U~;t1SUAL !.Jm f;lPJ~S ~O FOUND' 011 THE slin (1.t. cliffs. dunes. gtological forma- \.!I _. ticns, ttc.) , , _ Spec,fic hnd forms: IMPACT ON WATER NO YES 3. WILL PROJEC1" AFFr:cr ANY WATER BODY DESIGllATEO AS ..........~ 0 PROTECiED? (Und..r Articlts 15. 24. 25 of the Envir- ~ onll'.enUl Conservation Law, E.C.L.) , Ex.~les that Would Apply to ColUll'~ 2 Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of materill frorn channel of I protected stream. Construction in I designated freshwat.r or tidal wetland. Oth.r fmpacts: 4. WILL PROJ~Ci AFHCi ANY II0tl-PROTECTr:O EXISiltl1l OR NEll NO YES BODY OF \!ATER? ......................................:.....00 Ex.~ol.s that Would Apply to Column 2 A 10: Increase or decrease In the surfac! area of any body of water or more than I 10 acre incre..e or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: NO YES OG 5. WILL PROJECT AFFr:CT SURFACE OR GROUt/OHATER QUALITY? Exam,les that Would Apply to ColUMn 2 X Project will require I discharge pennit. ~ Project requires use of I source of water that does not have IPproval to ser.e proposed project. Project r.quires ~ater suoply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per min.t. ?umoing capacity. Construc~lon or ooeratlon causing any contamina~lon of a public water supply system. X Project wi 11 adversely "affect gro.r.dwacor. X - Llouid .~fluenc will be conveyed off the site to flcilities wnic~ pres2nc1l do not exist or "dVe lnacequace c!~acity. Project re~u;ring a ~3c~1;ty ~hat would use water in e.cess of 20.000 gallons per day. _ Project "ill IHely cau<t siltation or othor disc"".l tn'o an uis:lno body of "ater to the extent t~at "~~ere .. ......-. X - - - - - - - - - - - - - L~P.SC: lI'o~CT -1L -" - - , .' -X- X X - ..lL X - RU;UC r~ 2T "OJ EC"T C".Ar:GE "'. -1L - - -1L X x - .JL - X - - . : ., . J.. .t:.. .,. . . . ,( J ~ .. , ..' TENTI;'L CAli IIIPACT IE . LA_G!: REDUCED Qy . II~PACT PROJ ECT CHA:IGE -- - Other Imp4cts: LOcalized nii"Tat~ 1n;'rli'n9 ::101"'\.4 -L -1L ~rg~Qfc contam~D~~tl~~el fue to lawn er ~ ~zers-an . n - O~ Qalu. .. WILL PROJECT ALi._ OAAINAGE FlOH, PAT..~IIS OR S~RF~C. !:ATER ~o YES RU:IOF:? ................................................... 00 r 0 E.amole that ~ould Apply to Column Z . PreJect would Ia:"de flood water flows. - - . X Project Is likely to cause substantial ero.ion. during ..2L -L. - construttion. PreJect Is nco~atible with existing drainage patterns. - Oth~r fOlpacts: - - . 11O YES 7. WILL PROJECT AFF.Ci AIR QUALlTY?......:...................O Q E.a~oles that Would Apply to Colu~ Z rHl'ACT OI/IIR Project wfll Induce 1,000 or more vehicle trfps fn any gfven hour. Preject will re.ult fn the fncfneration of more t~an 1 ton of refuse per hour. Pro!ec: emission rate of all contaminants will e.ce.d 5 lb.. per ~our or a ~oat source preducing more than 10 .illion STU'. per ~our. I -X- Ot~tr ietpacts: QUgt :ra i ~pn rln,..; nq construct'; nn of ~ndominiumsand in additlon thereto, during construction of shouninlZ C'F'nt.pr - - -X- -X- Y"'''-''CT O~: Pl.5fljS~~IO 4tH~'~!..S o E.amoles tha~ Wculd Apply to Colucn Z Reduction of on. or more species listad on the ~ew York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or fcund on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or signfficant wild- 11 f. ha~1 t3t. Ap~Jication of Pestfcide or ~ertllcf de over c:ore than tW1C! ! year ot~er t~in for a9ri~~!tural pur~cs!s. Ot.'!!,. 1r.:~ac:'s: .:Ill YES €)O 8. l/IL~ PROJECT AFF<CT ANY THREATENED OR E.~OAllGE_ED SP.CIEST - - ~ - ,. ~rL~ ?~=':ECT '!C~Sj,..~:jI).lLY AFi!CT ~:C:I-~-!REAT:::jD ~~ ~tO YES -"'''r.-''J .'E.'-.' /":;\ 0 c.~",,,,,,....c.",,,, ;)r \",:.;). .......................................0 E1~~~le ~~at ~oul~ ~pply to Colu~ Z . Project ~ould su~stant~al1y fnter'er! with lnl ~!si~ent or ~:g~!.tory fish or wildlife !;lee;!'!. Prnject r!cuires the re~Qval of ~ore t~ln 1~ J:rts of "'atUrt forest (':',er 100 ,..r1 In a9') Qr ot,,- 1.cally 1=~~r:Jr.t yt~!t1:~on. - - .' 1. 2.. :; ,,' ( - " '.. 'A~L TO\ OTErlTlAL CA:: 11~?ACl ,aE . . ~ODEAATE LARGE REDUCED BY --' I"P~CT II1P~CT PROJECT CH.~r;CE It'PACT 0:1 VISUAL RESOURCE 10., WILL THE PPOJECT AFFECT VIEWS. VISTAS OR THE VISUAL lID YES CHARACTER OF THE r:EIGH8IlRI'OOO DR COr<uNITYl .............. 00 E..m.les that Uould Apply to Column 2 L An Incompatible yfsu.l affect caused by the fnt.ad"ctlon .JL -1L of new mlte~ials. colo~s and/o~ fonr~ In contr.st to the su~.au~dln~ l.ndsc.pe. , , ' X A p.aject ..slly yfslble. not ..slly screened,th.t is X- X - - obYlously different from others around It. - Project will ~esult In the .llmln.tlon o~ ~jo~ - - sc~eenlng of scenic ylews or ylst.s kno>,~ to be 'mport.nt to the are~. . Other '....eu: - '- IMPACT ON HISTORIC RESOURcES 11. 1I1Ll PROJECT WPACT ANY SITt;, OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC. NO YES PRE-HISTORlC OR PALEO<<TOGlCAL I";ORTANCE? .................~ <:::> E..~.les th.t Would Apply to Column 2 Project occurinq wholly or p.rtl.lly within or contiguous to any f.cility or sfte listed em the Nltion.l Registe~ of, historic pl.ces. Any fmp.ct to .n archeological site or fossil bed loc.ted within the project site. -. Other Ialp.cts: l~'PACT ON OPEN SPACE & REC~E,~ilC~' 12. WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT THE OUAI/TITY OR OUALlTY OF EXISTING NO YES OR ruTURE OPErl SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTU~lilES?...... 0 0 E..~les th.t I~uld Apply to Column Z The permanent foreclosure of a future recreation.l opportunity. A m.jor reduction of an open sp.ce Important to the community. -X. Othe~ la::l.cts:, An a~d~ tional recree..Uonal burden of ".siivers nuna~ed Se~l?r cltlzens on a hamlet with few facilitieE a~d In addltl9n thereto the construction of the shop- . . plng center wlll be adj.l.cent to an eXlsting school pla~ grgund, and this factor must be consIdered. . I~PICT ~Pl TR.~ll~?ORT~T1C~1 - - - - - -X- -L. 13. ~ILL TH~~~ aE All EFFEC7 TO EXIS71NG rRANSPCRiAr;CN SYSiE;.tS? ......... ..... ... ......0......... .............. NO YES OQ E..nDl~5 ~~.t Would Apply to Colunn 2 -1l Alterati.n of present ~.tterns of mo'/el"ent of people and/o~ goed.. x Project ..111 result fn severe traffic proble"'s. e.t 'intersection of ~oute 25. Stich problems will be caused by the condo- m;;mum project and ~n addition thereto.. bated b t" ~<:O:ru::S':d con'ltruction of the shopping cllf&,"f. . Y. e - ~gnlflcant lncrease in non-drivlng residents and proxi mlty of grammar school must be c09sidered in connection ..... ~ ....., ~ -~ -, " - - ~ - \ - ...L- ~ ,X X - X X X X - - x with condominium pro"'t and~ addition thereto in conjunction with constructlon of the shopping center. . ( , . . : .. ~ . ( w' 0' w. . . ---. '''PACT ON E~IE~GY 14. WILL P~QJECT 4FFaCi THE ccrC~UNITIES SOURCES OF PJaL ~R ~ YE E.~ERGY SUPPLY? . . ... .., . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . .. .. .. ... . ," .. . .. .. . '0 <D Extmol.s that ~auld Apply ta Calumn 2 x PraJatt causing gretter than 5: increase In Iny faMO af' Inergy used in MUnicipality. Project re~ulring the creatian ar Ixtensian af In ene"Vy trlns~lsslan ar supoly system to serve mare thin 50 single or to." far.1ily residences. Other ir.Jpacts: . . . 1L I"P~CT ON NOISE 15. WILL THERE BE 09JECTIOUA~LE OOORS. IIOISE, GLARE. 1!:o~iION ~O YE or aECHICAL OISiU?2",/lCa .\S A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? ....0<9 Extmoles that Wauld Apoly to Cal",," 2 Blasting within 1,500 faet af a haspltal, schoal ar ather sensitive facility. Odors will accur routinely (II1Or. than an. haur p.r dAY). Project will aroduce aperating naise exceedinp the loe41 .~bient noise levels far noise Guts;de of st~JC~Ure5. Project will remove natural barriers that wauld tct es a noise ser'!en. X' Other ir:pacts: Intense construction l'joise to complete project in. one year, and in addition construction nois of~ondominium ~roject and shopping center project mus be considered wlth respect to the grammar school. 'I"PAc. O/! HE,.Lr.~ , U,'ZAC~S 16. HILL PROJECT AF,ECT PUaLIC HEALrri ANO SA,ErY? Ex.~:l.s thet Wauld Apply ta Calumn Z NO YE ... ..........0 0 . Project will cause. risk af explasian ar release of hazlrdous substanc.s (i.e. all. pesticides. cher.Jicals, radiation, etc.) In the event af accident ar upset conditians, ar tnere will be a chronic law lavel discharge ar emissian. Pro~e~t that will result in thl burial of .haz.rd:us wastes. ef.!. toxic, ~o;sonous. highly reactive. rad;cac~iYe. irr;tat~ngt ,1nf!c':ious, etc. t inc1u:iin~ wastas that. Ire $011(1, sl~1"solid. liquid a. cant.in ,asas.l Storae! facilities for ~~e mil1:on or ~ore gaTlor.s =f liquiffed nacural gas ar ather liouids. . Ot:"ler imwacts: ..,... 1 2. ~ :ALL TO JIE!m~,L CAii I:~?ACT' ca' . I~OtitHt LA~GE RQUCEO ay 1l"?~CT mPACT PReJECT CHANG;: S -1L - X - .... -X... . - .A.- i - - - - - - S '- - - - - - . - - - .' - - - - - - " " - -X- ...2L- S . - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - .' . I~PACT O~f GR:)~'!T;.4 A~!il C!-ft,~.;:: OF cni( fry OR ilEIG"1~~w~r'" U'~:'C7 I (" "' 1:;:)(',(. ;- P~o.J::cr. C;...~;:G.._ , . --17. WILL PP.OJECT AFFECT THE CHMACTEq of THE EXISTHIG /10 YES CO:~!U:lITY? ................... ........................... "0 Q Examole that \o!ould Apoly to Column 2 " " .. "' ." x The population of the City, Town or Village tn which the project is located is likely to grew by ~re than 5~ or resident human population. .L- -L- x The municipal budgets for capital exoenditures or opera- ting servic!s will increase by more than 5: per year as a " resu.lt o,f this prQject. (Increased pOll'ce amblllance fire serv~ce added burden on san~ta~y andfl~lJ ' Will involve any oennanent facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or r~~Ye prime agricultural lands from cuI tivation. The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities, strJctures or areas of historic importance to the community. -"'- Development will induce an influx of a particular 'ge gro.p with special needs. -L ~ .... x ..E2- X" " X" "- Projec~ will set an important precedent for future projects. Project will relocate lS or more employees in one or mo~ businesses. XX HOthe.,. imoacts: Impact of- construction of shouDing cente ---must be "considered in conjunction with construction of .........'n~l""\m.;:tlI.i'1m Fl?9jeet. '-"'- .L- IS. . NO " YES .......0 G) IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVErtSY CONCErtli!NG rriE PROJECT? Ex~oles that ~ould Apply to Column 2 X Either gov2rnment or citizens of adjacent communities have expressed opposition or rejected the project or have net been contacted. -A- '-A,. X x X Objections to the project from within the community. IF ANY ACTION IN PART 2 (S IOE:ITIFIEO AS A POTENTIAL LARGE l"PACT OR IF YOU CA:;::OT. OtTER;'!I1lE THE MAG:lITUOE OF H1?ACT, PROCEED ,A PArtT 3. PORTlOtlS OF EAF C011?lETED FOR illlSPRDJECT: OETERMIlIATlON PART 1..lL- PART n.....A- PART 3 X Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1, Z and 3) anj considering both the magnitude and importance of each 1mp~c:. it is reasonably determined tha;3 A. The ,reject will result in no major fmpacts and, therefcr~t is one ~hich ~ay not cause significant damage to the environ~ent. PREPARE A NEr,ATIVE OECL~RATIOtl o S. Alt~cugh the project could have a significant effect on the env~~nment, th~re ~jl1 not be a sig~lfic!nt effect in this C3se bec3use the mitia~ticn me~s~res descr:bea in PART J h~ve been fnc!y~ed as part.of t~e ~rcposed ~r~jec:. DECLARATIOn pp.ErArtE A NOVE PP.E?I~~E, ?OS~TIV~ ~~lo:~qOC~\~ .t<~~~" //~~~/ ~lgnat~te or Rp.s~onsl~le Official/in L~t Agencll " c. 7ne ~~~ject will ~esult in one or ~ore major ad~e~~e imcac:s that cannot ~e redU~ed~3\C may cause signlfic3nt d3~age t~ the envircnment.~ ~~ ate ( u ~d Signature of Preparer ~fficer) Prlnt or ~YPt n.~e of responslbie offic: In L..d Agency . _ i ,,_ . . ~. ". ~~J-8, i'l<~ ~])JJ);:.- (}jOAu1rJj;"1 6bi1JlLt 'ffJ~l"Aj/tl:.l) .. ~ . () l} ),J!JI.. jJJttth.c )~~J- ItL~o..,k'1 Jdw,u.'!f . ffi.,., J;in<1. \j JAJ )ojJi:7/rM{ 'dup Ou,..cW,lJ 6n OiA)/' )~ul. ~7?i.J7I11..i.;]U._D{- D (j '. ~r:L;'4 j:i~ PUfJ~'_ u.r~)- -1-f6~, ~ '. V .,A{Q.. ~.U ~C,_(j .J6w,;J.e~ I tl- ~/'1f:~~ Ci.?JJ)_ " ~JL W:cAD:lA. f:k ~~:UL~ !1:L,:'t. 9.-!"'1sbui1;J- 6~) J ; I/N1JL~~dJ.. )WJk~f . ilJ.\iL dM~Q) i -' ~ rYd-i/~ : 'U)j' "'f- "!! )l<6;":' / .id1', Ccb.y. !(L=C'!" f!.J. fl j};'w.f 7J{.) (j oJ.L Ji1- fijL !1~6DvX- l;'iJ-;I<J/LL. ~ wJ )0 }1r~~ mOt-UL /J1)1~Ail[. Ji;.. ~1 ~iPJL ~_zfw~b' at l:Ad ~" V funJ))3 J~J) ttrL OvvL )1(/<.( J-ic.. u-:Jcj~Jf-' !J );J1J/ci. VjJJw jloi.~-I. P;c.;<- J a.'::~ . VJ )ll//,J{. dJ~~~'J\.. 0 ,1 Ct~t1D uJU)JJvi{ ~;.d 4,r:i'iJ./uL I;)) U-qL:L a;:.w- 'J ~"Jf:- j}'M7J-- il F/Fl:',-jlu. 'i1.tI}th 'J-c.J)ov.) ~J A.,:) _ V'/.A.-fC'Jc t.A.- clcJJu!.i..\J- I lUiu.<p:b 0..10. \J~ MilL /.f/11L~"-L ft. ,',!J.l-/~l~ aitL .~. A.D 1/,/)a;,;...,Y'" '4~!tli{cvd') /l'<-tl::- O},,-;Iv.. <.dt;t'....;f:h 3-rJ:.. . V paJu\ ~ cJ..M1;;.Jo f)J;vuY.. )J.p-L, !:tl..--tJ-it j:/la/h.. IYM?N. ()J~'1JJ{, cw /fJ-..L0~ I ~:;IIS -r'U) ft""- c/"i'.<.;k;"t~,)i~\!)s)e j}IJ 1M...... 'JI.Alin .L1. -h,~ Xl ~( r -~. '. ./ftJ' , I /41J.. /J/ LC j,)1. ,,! NVu..y u !' . ,~ 'J l' M__ e7u.. ef/,. . V pl' ,YJ't. ,.,- f . ).,yfiJ.-,; " UL j ')d~! 2D 1I)~11-6)' ~ /-hJ.t~ Yb" !( dc, /ivJ-r- ~V:~ ~)~h ,J {U.iiU '. ~ OJ) -A.J..f \.&J..a.Ad.. <JJ a..!'\_ /.}C/U! Wl'l.-{j:.1JVi d- ~; "~)tA.-' ~ -,'kJ.t..0.J.cl 6.)) 6u JuJ. ,'J fux, /-fo /t.;L Kk.fLuJ.-tu.,7\~_ , ~~ I. . U::J1'" o...c( 1;1, J.iJ.... L",. n Lv J 0 U 0 ~1l-L2/'J- 1\ I ~ ~mJ .,),.'I;I';(~' rA1c'"" '+t/J1.t1i.;'r...C:..../ :; It;.; i-'-'- / ")<.I1A-"',I,....J.{..~ . /\ !~ -11'6\%\1 ; / -J => -, " . ( " .'~~~1_ . ( 734-5100 AREA CODE 516 - , k~ -{f4<C-n- and' -{f4<C-n- ~~ 9 e1 @ml/ .958 -G'~. JY'Y //.985.CC8P ~/~ ~/~. '.Lk.. f/:P: ,..d'.~ ~_ ~ #'''- " '9'~-.t -{y.. H&& A/)y' ?d'd ~ 1':;'...6.. y~ .J."d'?." June 28, 1984 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall - Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Seacroft at Cutchoque Dear Sir: Your letter of June 4, 1984, in response to my letter to you of May 31, 1984, is hereby acknowledged. With respect to Item E, numbers 1 and 2, in your letter, I do hereby demand, in the interest of fair play and as a mani- festation of good faith in the performance of your duties, that you immediately advise the undersigned, in writing, of the with- drawal by the Board, of the data requested. It is the opinion of the undersigned that you are not legally entitled to this information in the performance of your duties as a Planning Board and that said data is unnecessary in your determination of site plan approval. I should also bring to your attention that, while I was not informed prior to the Planning Board Meeting of June 25, 1984, that Seacroft was on the Agenda of the Planning Board, for a Resolution by the Board to declare itself lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, I was present on other matters when the Board passed such a Resolution. Again, I would point out to the Board that its action in passing such a Resolution was illegal, unlawful and contrary to the provisions of Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act. In the light of the foregoing, I do hereby demand that the Planning Board forthwith rescind or vacate the Resolution adopted at its meeting on July 25, 1984, declaring itself lead agency under the SEQR process. ~ ,17Ai'i.l J'O>.N'f'l ,\ .' ,,' . ( ( . Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board June 28, 1984 Page two I do further demand that, in the event the Board chooses:. not to vacate the Resolution above adopted, and to withdraw its request for Item E, numbers 1 and 2, as set forth in its letter of June 4, 1984, it consult with the Town Attorney for the Town of Southold prior to a finalization of such decisions. RJC:e cc: Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor Robert W. Tasker, Esq., Town Attorney . . ( D Southold. N. Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 27, 1984 Mr. Richard Cron Attorney at Law Main Road Cutchogue, N:Y 11935 Re: Seacroft site plan located at Cutchogue Dear Mr. Cron: Enclosed herewith is Part I of the Long Environmental Assessment Form whi~h the Planning Board requests be filled out and returned for the Seacroft site plan. The Planning Board, meanwhil~ is reviewing this site plan and as soon as the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part I is recieved, the SEQR process can be continued. Please, als~ forward s'ix (6) copies of the site plan in order that we may make the necessary referrals to the state and county agencies under the SEQR review. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR., CHAIRMAN ~THOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD. ~ OI\J..o~\ C'n ~ By Diane M. Schultze, secreliry enc. JUN 2:.01984 . . DOROTHY S. REDDEN 47A Pine Tree Road Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 June 20, 1984 Bennett Orlowski, Chair, and Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, N.V. 11971 Gentlemen: Like many others, I am ooncerned about the possibility of a Seacroft in Cutchogue, and other developments of the sort. If it is true that a large proportion (nearly a third?) of Southold Town homes are seasonal second homes, why need we go out of our way to raise this percentage? More or less affluent new- comers are certainly an asset to the community, but they also bring disadvantages. Chiefly, they begin to outnumber and crowd out the long-time residents and their children, especially those in the low and moderate income groups. It isn't only what another Seacroft will do to the North Fork which is so disturbing, but what it will not do for it, and in fact help to prevent. As has recently been pointed out, multi-family housing is badly needed here. Instead of expensive Seacrofts, we need modest, attractive, affordable houses and apartments for our young families and older residents. Surely there is adequate profit to be made from this sort of construction. I'm glad you are insisting on a complete ~nvironmental Impact Statement from Seacroft, and a thorough analysis of that, along with serious consideration of alternatives. Something else is needed. I've been told that it is not uncommon to reauire of new develop- ments that a fixed percentage of their units be 'held for lower in-' come families. wny can't this principle be extended to apply also to years of Southold Town residence? That is, new developments could be required to reserve a certain number of low to moderate income units for local long-time residents and their families. It wouldn't be hard to devise a simple point system to make this prin- ciple work. And the tangible and intangible benefits accruing from keeping our old friends, relatives, and neighbors with us can hardly be overestimated. cc: Southold Town Board Dave Emilita, Town Planner Nancy Sawastynowicz, SOS Bessie Swann, CAST Harper LeCompte, Social Resp. Comm. UU Ruth Oliva, N.F. Environmental Coun~il Sincerely, ~yU~S.~ Dorothy S. Redden ...."\\-,-.rJ" lJ Y'Z":> \ ')'v\ . . - . JUN 21 - . 1984 Q.~# . , I, Lj30 ~df. , ,'1l 1/9 3 s (/ ~ /1, /HY u""" 1 WUV 'J ~ c...'\.J) (, ~ ~ ~ I n,'O' 1177/ !~. , (1~~ ~a-.-'~pJf.~ ~<a. rr' C\W'^-1.J\'\.\<t< . ( . P~~~D TOl~,<~'!~~lJ ~rtD SUFF9J;K' OgNTY ~ ( Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 15, 1984 Mr. James Cron Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Mr. Cron: Pursuant to your request for a certified copy of the June 4, 1984 resolution of the Planning Board pertaining to Seacroft, please let this confirm that there was no action taken by the Planning Board regarding Seacroft at that meeting. Therefore, there was no resolution. There was discussion of the site plan at the meeting, however, which will be in the Planning Board minutes. These minutes have not been transcribed as of this date Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR.,CHAIRMAN ~OUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD .~~ O\Lc~ \10 dn.D By Diane M. Schultze,'~c:retary ---- . . ( c, -----~-._~ _.---- - - -. - - -- -. 6/14/84 - '- -.- -_ ___ __n_.. ___ Diane: James Cron wants ~certified copy of resolution pertaining to "Lynn San Andres" on 6/4/84 P.B. Mtg. & resolution re: Seacroft taken on that date also. If you will prepare them and give them to me, I will certify them. ?:u~ .~..,.. _..;~- ~ . ----- -- ~ . ., jO, . .' FRANCIS J. MURPHY SUPERVISOR MAIN ROAO SOUTHOLO, L.I., N,Y, 11971 June 11, 1984 Mr. Lawrence E. Doodson P.O. Box 550 2495 Highland Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Mr. Doodson: I am in receipt of your letter regarding the Seacroft Development. Your concerns and objects will certainly be taken into consideration. Your letter has been sent to the Southold Planning Board and the Consulting Firm, Raymond, Parish, pine and Weiner, Inc. I thank you for taking the time to write and express your feelings towards this project. Very FJM: jmr ~^-- TELEPHONE (516) 765.1800 (516) 765-1939 . . ( Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 11, 1984 Mr. Robert Tasker Town Attorney 425 Main Street Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Seacroft at Cutchogue Dear Mr. Tasker: Enclosed is a copy of correspondence from Mr. Richard Cron, attorney for the above mentioned site plan; also enclosed is a copy of our reply correspondence. If you need any further information, please don't hestitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR.,CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD ~ n..loLD~ l0r::S..-nj~ By Diane M. 1fcnultze, S~~etary enc. . (" . (, Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 8, 1984 Cutchogue Fire District Board of Fire Commissioners New Suffolk Avenue Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Sirs: , - Enclosed please find the map of Seacroft, a site plan located at Cutchogue. Would you please review this map and notify the Planning Board if you see a need for any fire wells on this site plan. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR., CHAIRMAN ~OUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD \DLLJ...ctl OiLf """-""- (cL CX\ cll'lA-J By Diane M. S~tze~ ~ecretary enc. I \ \ \ \ . \. .C e( JUN 5 jtlUJlJI ;~-" June 4, 1984 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road, P.O. Rox 953 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Seacroft Condominium Development Dear Mr. Orlowski: While reviewing the Town Planning Board records on behalf of SOS, a community group concerned with the oversized Seacroft condominium project, I came across the attached letter which appears to he signed hy Searoft developer Richard Cron. It speaks, somewhat brutally, for itself. Most people realize that, with the current building boom in Southold, the Planning Roard hns heen over- burdened. The addition of new members to the Board and the Town's first professional planning office will, in the long run, greatly serve the needs of the Town. At the moment, however, a period of adjustment must he expected and endured. Further, the Seacroft proposal i tsel f, 160 units covering vast nreas of prime farmland, is a complicated undertaking worthy of a thorough and detailed review. It is, therefore, particularly distressing to find that, while the Planning Hoard memhers and the new Town Planner are considering the project, as required by the zoning law, and the possibility of an Environmental Impact Statement, as required by the State Environmental Qual i ty Review Act, the deve loper of Sea croft has concluded that a seven- week period is an "intentional" and "unconscionahle" delay "or the product of gross negligence" (see letter dated May 31, 1984 of Richard Cron, third and fourth paragraphs). \ I,\'\8v\ " .( e( -2- That bit of histrionics ~ay be nup. to thp. fact that, against covnentional wisdom, one of the developers of the Seacroft conoominium has hired hi~self as an attorney. However, the blatant threat by this attorney, ---1 now wish to apprise the Board, and its individual members, that if Seacroft and its participants incur any irreparable harm or damages due to this unconscionable delay, we intend to seek legal redress for any damage suffered due to your Board's conduct.-, is appalling. This is a blatant abuse of procp.oure rlesigned solely to intimidate individual members on the Planning Hoard. Our attorneys advise us that any such lawsuit against individual members of the Board woulo fail miserably ann woulo insteao create causes of action against Mr. Cron and the other litigants for abuse of process and malicious prosecution. As you may have read, the County of Suffolk recently obtained a substantial judgment against a person who hrought a lawsuit with a similarly hollow and baseless complaint. However, the thrp.at maoe against you is consistent with the developer's attempts to stifle public discussion of what has he come an increasingly controversial development project. For whatever reasons, the op.velopers of Seacroft Condominiums continue to seek special tretment from the Town government and continue to refuse to allow the normal process of open public debate and reasoned review by professionals to touch thp.ir pet project. This is, or at least should be, unacceptable. Whilp. the oeveloper continup.s his self-rightp.ous raindance and threatens the Board with more thunder and lightning from the sky, it is time for all of the citizens of Southold to realize the rain is over. It is time for Some sunshine to be shed upon the Seacroft disaster. That is why we hope that the Board will continue its meticulous and steany review of the project ann include within their analysis, a full disclosure of the environmental impacts of the project upon the human environment in Cutchogue. \ . ( ec -3- As for the developers, the Planning Board is due (1) an open and immediRte apology, or (2) the withdrawal of the application for the failure or inability of the developers to proceed in good faith. Sincerely, ,-/?~(f~ Nancy Sawastynowicz ChairMan SUS cc: Members of Southold Town Planning Board Memobers of Southolrl Town Board . - < " . ( . ( r "J >.)1...... Southo1d. N. Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 4, 1984 Mr. Richard Cron Attorney at Law Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Seacroft Dear Mr. Cron: The fOllowing site development plan elements are required to be indicated onthe map for the further review of the Seacroft project at Cutchogue as enumerated in Article XIII, Site Plan Approval of the Southold Town Code, as referenced under paragraph 100-134 site development plan elements. . Legal Data 1. Lot, block and section numbers -~ 2. Name and address of the owners of record (full disclosure) 6. Indicate street widths 7. The location and owne:ts of all adjoining lands, as shown on the late~t tax map records. 8. Indicate emergency entrance-exits 9. A complete outline of existing deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property. 10. Existing zoning. D. Proposed development 2. Show off-street parking for clubhouse and tennis courts ,.', -3. Show the location, direction, power, and time of use of any proposed e'utdoor lighting or public address systems. , , . ~ . -,' . Mr. Richard~ron ( Page 2 . JU(. 4, 1984 ---------------------------------------------------------- D. Continued 4. Location of and plans for any outdoor signs. 5. The location and arrangement.....9f:1'l:ClE9Sed means of access and egress, (f~~ludi~g .s~dewalkS; driveways, or other paved areas; prof~les indicating grading and cross sections showing width of roadway, location and width of sidewalks and location and size of water and sewer lines. 6. Any proposed grading, screening and other landscaping including types and locations of proposed street trees. 7. The location of all proposed waterlines, valves and hydrants and of all sewer lines or alternate means of water supply and sewage disposal and treatment. 8. An outline of any proposed deed restrictions or covenants. 9. Any contemplated public improvements on or adjoining the property. 710. If the site development plan indicates only a first stage, a supplementary plan shall indicate ultimate development. E. Other information --------__.) 1. Draft Environmental Impact statement is requested because of various discrepancies found in the initial EIS submitted with the change of zone. ____) 2 . Traffic study to be updated to indicate summer peak use, last study done on Monday, January 24,1983. 3. Interior road intersections should be at right angles. _._~ 4. Architect I s solution of side entrance to garage should I be followed with common driveways where applicable. , ~5. Suggest common walkways along roads and into open .1 space for walking and cycling. 6. Set back from road looks tight in many cases. 7. Provide overall grading and drainage systems design with retention on site. --------'::, 8. Suggest underground electrical service. +ele,l\-('r,e.. ", " /- \. << 'Mr. Richard c~n ( Page 3 . Jt: 4, 1984 E. Continued 9. Provide sanitary disposal system design and include location. 10. Landscaping to develop street tree pattern, screening, and foundation plantings, including type and size. __) 11. Question on maintenance building for equipment and storage for grounds and building maintenance. 12. Well site is indicated, but no support building, storage tank, and access is shown. The Planning Board will continue the preliminary site plan review upon receipt of the above requested information and plans. Thank you for your attention. ~~~L,<m.n Southold Town Planning Board e(/ e(JUN51984 Ir /vats LtN/6 _u____ _ -. _.- ._____~=_~-____C,+c) ~!.q.u-e _k~U!fJS- ----.-- ____n________ ---.----- ---- . ,; I ..____-__~_=_=~_~=___=-:~-=_ ~- J~~~_~) if (i-_~----~==~=-. . -E- q-+ i..)~.-.. .70 ~.AI-f7d~~/IJ;-.-tJ ;:-; l--------------::n------- ( av N Ife)! / ... .__ ...____ -u___ ~q -fhd !ell_IV ,f, . n Ili1.1.__.... ------_________n___ - --_."-------'-------~-_._-_._- '" .- --- - -. --- -.- ---------- -------- _....._~-.- -..--- ------.---.----- .~..__.- ---- (;:e fJ -f /~ fI1e/iJ; _ _ _ _ un _ _ _ .u_ ____ _ _ _ ____ __ _ . _____ n :.:L _ a;~.. lAJrl'J;NJ=-~~{;:;~-/ei!~;-.-K.--u~_J-~~j~~-.=- f/aIJAli/j, l3oa.rrf+c. LIfA.fre.- . ~ -r;; !(E/t/v,'c.cuv/I.w/I../ Tr'lfdC ~ . ~+(i-4. ,?1e"'~n_"'V _ .j)....elrOI(1f...c1_J;~~rdfr._ CON /0 fI1'-/J ; U 1'1 (ro.) 4<:> -i_ _-'IlL _ C1JoJu_e.!__ ______.._n_____ I _---C~(--~{r.t____11~; -.f;V~~i.--~)f..-.?-~~-- a,_==_ _ L/ (r 7 fVeJ a f,- if e. .. e+recf_n-"J,v___ r..jJ...e-_~l1I.f/.l"rdN /'1(>A/T_ _____ ,rJ oClr _qre~._v -fJ..~'f_i.c iNAt_:::t I'lalre-__{le.- <::-6ove rJl<-er-f I _ ____ _n_ ____n______ jXoJ/k _yuu,. -. __. u _ __=~~~:- ~ fol'\CY c;,- N C~.L(: 1/; &~fk-~ (3rt( c e.- -ft-;--:r S'(L~~; ------ . . (' " ~~ f/ &11$-Mi47~(f~ June ), 1984- Southhold Town 20ard To",'m 'Iall - ~lain Road Southold, New York Gentlemen: Our decision to live in Cutchogue is a thoughtful one - Cutchogue was chosen because we really cherish the small, un- touched quality of life Cutchogue has to offer - it is a valuable asset in 1984-. We are writing to request that a full environmental impact study be done for the proposed Seacroft " Senior Citizen " Housing Complex. As professional people, we respect that the letter of the law has thus far been followed by the developers of th~s pro- ject, but nothing we have seen to this point indicates that they have followed the spirit of the law. In a community the size of Cutchogue, 950 citizens surely comprise a sizable percentage of our population. These 950 in- dividuals who signed a petition which requested a public hearing on Seacroft, object to the large impact such a community could have on life in our village. To contemplate a change of this magnitude without careful study is frightening, if not, reckless. We appeal to the good sense we have seen up to this point displayed by the Planning Board in its handling of our future - the Master Plan. Please look down the road to the possible consequences of such a drastic project and immediately request an Environmental Impact Study to appraise water, sewage and quality of life factors to ensure the safety of the citizens of the Village of Cutchogue. Respectfully yours, Dr. & Mrs. Anthony Mitarotondo AMI fT(bI'-1 v\ \ 1, \,:"C-\ JUt~ 1 1984 . . June 1, 1984 Alvahs Lane Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 Planning Board of Southold Town Town Hall, Main Road Southold, New York, 11971 Dear Planning Board, I have recently been made aware of the changes in the plans for Seacroft condominium in the Hamlet of Cutchogue. The condominium was determined by the Town Board that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment should the project be implemented as planned. That was proposed as a retirement community consisting of 160 condominium units with occupant thereof being of minimum age 55 years. The sewage and water use were based on "Senior Citizen community". The traffic were based on widows and widowers. Any one can see with the dev- elopers now lowering the age limit with no rules as to minimum age the impact of course will be far greater. The original E.A.F. form is no good. A new traffic analysis needs to be drawn up. Please have an accurate Environmental Impact Sta~ent completed on this huge-high-density condominium. Thank you, ~5r'~ C~GI!lrszf .C .( JUN 5 1984 June 1, 1984 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Gentlemen. I am concerned about the Seacroft condominium for the Cutchogue Hamlet. The density this condo will bring will have a huge impact to our town. The developers are now lowering the age with no assurance that any minimum would be honored. Please take a good look at all the reports they have submitted, they are based on senior citizen and single occupants. With no rule to the age limit please ask that the Seacroft developers have an environmental impact statement done. The current sight plan is not in conformity with the Master Plan. There must be a new E.I.S. done on this project so there can be time for public controversy concerning this project. Th=JOU~ CTP:5YV[ 0l (1) 8'tj " e( .( J llJJ6 It).) 'J. J.ffji\J June I ,1984 Mr. Orlowski and Board Members, I have enclosed newspaper clippings from a recent public meeting of concerned citizens like myself over the future of Cutchogue.We are concerned over the proposed Seacroft project. We do not want it:: The area that is proposed to be developed has a high concentration of traffic during the summer months and will cause many traffic difficulties. I urge you to insist on an Environmental Impact Statement from these people who prppose to develop it and a traffic study during the summer months with the increased population and heavy traffic. You owe it to us the people who live here and will remain here long after the developers profit and move to Ocala, Florida. Let's keep Cutchogue the lovely place it is. The condos will do nothing for Cutchogue or its people.They will only make fat pockets for Cron, Nolan,and Carroll. AN IMPACT STUDY MUST BE DONE~:::::::: We will all have to live with your decisions, especially you:: DON'T FORGET US:::::: Concerned for Cutchogue \ ' rY1 (~r--e;;(V, ~)-] 2'!, I . -"t. ,<..,.,,~ .. l ,..._....;,r~ .. Jt5 19~ June 1, 1984 Planning Board of Southold Town Main Road Southold, New York 11971 To the Planning Board, I have recently been made aware of the changes in plans for the Seacroft condominium. It got its zone change as a retirement community with occupant being of minimum age 55 years. The Town Board determined that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment if the project is implemented as plan- ned. Lowering the age is not keeping it a Senior Citizen community, or a retirement community. With the changes the developers are now making to the original plan. a Environmental Impact statement must be prepared. The traffic analysis was based on retired persons, single person occupants, widows and widowers. Please consider all the possible negative impacts that may occur with the age lower and no rule as to age. Please require that a full Environ- mental Impact Statement be prepared on Seacroft. Thank you for your consideration. d a~hY}....)~)1!' . I // -() . /' -,.. ./.. /114-7tt(~ v1^""] 'r {-/ C-reM {p \ 1/<(;1--1 . . JUN 1 1984 June 2, 1984 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road, Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Planning Board: I am conderned about the proposed Seacroft condominium plans for Cutchogue. As a concerned Cutchogue resident I recently reviewed copies of the original documents submitted by the developers to the Town Board when they sought the initial zone change. There were some serious inconsistencies among those documents, especially in their Environmental assessment form. The developers were granted the zone change for the project being described as a proposed retirement community, with occupant of minimum age 55 years. The water use and sewage were based on "Senior Citizen community". The traffic report was based on retired persons and single person occupants or widows and widowers. Now that the developers have decided to set the age with no hard and fast rule," The forms they received the zone change on are no good, Please have a meaningful Environmental Impact Statement completed on Seacroft, It is unthinkable to have a project this size without an E.I.S. to make sure of any possible negative impacts. There has been alot of promblems with this project, and in all respect to our Town let it be developed with accurate forms and facts. I:~\ \0\" Thank you, ~~ . ( . ( PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN REVIEW SEACROFT at CUTCHOGUE JUN 1 1984 . Traffic 1. Traffic counts were abtained on 1/24/83 (nan summer period) . Road System 1. What is width of road? Paving section? 2. Intersections should be at right angles. 3. Emergency entrance-exit should be provided. 4. What is drainage concept? 5. Entrance gate house should have turn around areo. . Driveways 1. Suggest architect's solution, entrance on side of garage. 2. Common driveways where applicable. . Pathwoys 1. Suggest common walkways along road and into open space areas for walking and cycling. 2. Roads are too narrow to accommodate both. . Units 1. Setback from road looks tight in many cases. 2. Clubhouse too close to road, no parking provided. . Grading and Drainage 1. Provide overall system. 2. Retain water on site. . Ut ili ties 1. Underground service (electrical) L.I.L.C.O. 2. Water (central well site indicated) Health Department. . Sanitary 1. Keep to road side. 2. Does project require public sanitary system (treatment plant)? . Landscapin!'j 1. Develop street tree pattern for project. 2. Provide a variety of foundation plantings. 3. Where is maintenance building for equipment and storage for grounds and building maintenance? Submitted by: Richard G. Ward Planning Board Member June 1, 1984 . ,- . ( JUN 1 198. ( 734-5100 AREA CODE 516 .;\ .-.', . .' k~ -e~ ruu/-e~ ~ .9kd 9 tJ fJ8f)d; .P.J".Y -e~. Jl(W //.P.Y.J"-cc.ylP ~/~ fi-/ C""",,' '.Lk. A/?j( ......r.n. ~_ ,92:~~. Iy ~_t' ~., .Htltl . ~f/1I: ?d'd ~ e:cde. ,92:~ .J.?o?.? May 31, 1984 Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall - Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Re: Seacroft Proposed Site Plan Cutchogue, New York The proposed site plan for Seacroft was last before your Board at a pre-submission conference, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, on April 9, 1984. As you know, the purpose of the pre-submission conference was to enable the Board to indicate which of the development plan elements would be required pur- suant to SlOO-134 of the Code. Almost eight weeks have expired since that pre-submission conference and to date we have re- ceived nothing from the Planning Board as to the matters we should address for the site plan approval. In the light of the fact that there are basically only three areas, pursuant to SlOO-131, to which the Planning Board should be concerned, I find it inconceivable that such a period of time must elapse before we are furnished with data from you so that we may finally proceed. You can appreciate, I am sure, that any delay in time is exceedingly costly to this project and is now reaching the point where the individual participants are being financially' prejudiced by your Board's unexplained inaction. In the light of the time that has now elapsed, one must seriously conclude that the delay on the part of the Board has been intentional, or the product of gross negligence. In the light of the foregoing, I now wish to apprise the Board,and its individual members,that if Seacroft and its par- ticipants incur any irreparable harm or damages due to this un- conscionable delay, we intend to seek legal redress for any damage suffered due to your Board's conduct. -~\\a.\ !)YJ' 0\ ,\ ' , " O,/' , . ( Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board May 31, 1984 Page two . ( I trust that this letter will spur the Board to perform its legally proscribed function for the good of all concerned and, in particular, for the Town of Southold. ver<~Uly;o-~r~1------') <:~/J.;~~n/Vl_--_- . 1 /" ':.....----_/ /' ~ ~/,. RJC:e . . THOMAS A. TWOM EY, JR, STEPHEN S. LATHAM JOHN F. SHEA, III ROBERT D. PIKE CHRISTOPHER D. KELLEY AMY B. TURNER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 33 WEST SECOND STREET p, O. BOX 398 RIVERHEAD. NEW YORK 11901 +Iand. de-' liveft'd RECEIVED BY SDUmDW !DWN PlANNING BOARD TWOMEY. LATHAM & SHEA DATE (516) 727.2180 9 NORTH MAIN STREET EAST HAMPTON, N.Y. 11937 {5161 324-1200 May 31, 1984 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Seacroft Condominium Development Dear Mr. Orlowski: This office represents an informal organization of Cutchogue residents known as "SOS". We understand that the nevelopers of the "Seacroft" condominiums have had a presubmission conference and have asked the Planning Hoarn to visit the site. We would request as, when and if the nevelopers make a formal application for site plan approval, that the Planning Hoarn require a long-form environmental assessment (EAF) form he filed ann when it is, that a copy of the entire application, including the EAF, be forwarded to this office. This has not been previously done on the builning project; it has only been done on the zoning change. The project itself is far more likely to trigger the significance and the need for an environmental impact statement than the mere zoning change. Because it is clear that the project will totally destroy forty acres of productive prime farmland, we believe a fair evaluation of the proposed project will reveal that there is a strong probability of a significant impact on the environment and that the lead agency in this application should require a full draft environmental impact statement to be preparen by the applicant. Attached please find photocopies of petition cards of over 150 citizens of Southold who joined in our request for full environmental review. Another 900+ signatures are heing filed at this time with the Town Clerk. If you have any questions or concerns, I can be reached at my Riverhead office. Sincerely, f2f1.~ i:J v:?~ Robert D. Pike RDP: j 0 ,....,.... ~ c:n<.::. , .' . JU" 1 i '984 . a ~ , ....\- ., P. O. Box 550 2495 Highland Road Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 Ma;y 31, 198f ~ -- D /-' ~lEQ~~rti1 ulJt~\j - 5%;11[ U II IL:) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD The Hon. Frank Murphy, Town Supervisor Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear 11r. Murphy, I want to go on the record as being Gpposed to an event which seems to be going forward like a steamroller in spite of the displeasure and opposition of the residents, homeowners and taxpa;yers of Cutchogue. I am referring to the proposed Seacroft Oondominiums in Cutchogue. ~ wife and I chose ~~tchogue to build our retirement home because we fell in love with the rural, peaceful and unhurried character of the area. Now the moneymakers want to change the area's character into another South Fork vr Western Suffolk with its traffic and people congestion. In the Fall of 1983 Mr. Cron and Mr. Nolan made a presentation to the Mattituck Senior Citizens Club at the Peconic Senior/youth Center. Of course, nobody was very happy at the idea of having condominiums in the midst of our homes. Messrs. ~ron and Nolan presented an architect's sketch showing 160 units in clusters of four units to be built on 46 acres behind the Sacred Heart Catholic Church in Cutchogue. This seemed to mean approximately four units (one cluster) to an acre. It was presented as a Retirement Communit,r for persons over the age of 55. Messrs. Cron and Nolan expressed concern for those people who had grown old, perhaps widowed, who could no longer financially maintain the big older homes they had lived in. No children under 19 years of age were to be allowed to reside in the condominiums and the communi t,r Was going to have a securi t,r gate. ~ objection, as well as those of many others to the project is the concentration of 160 to 300 people and automobiles right in the heart of beautiful "Down town Cu tchogue" . I might add at this point that the developers succeeded in having the propert,r rezoned for condominiums by the Southold Town Board even though the Planning Board had rejected the plan. Then on April 12, 1984 I read in THE TRAVELER WATClll1AN where the developers of the project had presented preliminary sketch plans to the Southold Planning Board which have significant changes from the original proposal. The latest proposals are, l~ \;;"\:~'^ . . . -. ~. ThE Hon. Frank Murphy, Town Supervisor -2- Ma,y 31, 1984 1. 36 to 37 acres to be left open and could be used as "vineya:rds or orchards if the association of ownera at the project ...ant it" according to Mr. Nolan. 2. O~ 10 acreSl (a) 160 condominiUlll units (b) About 50,000 square feet of store space (c) Parking space for 433 cars for the shopping plaza (d) Age of the residents now reduced from "55" to "45-55". THE TRAVELER WATCHMAN quotes a Mr. Strand, a traffic engineer, of "assuring the Board that Route 25 ...ould not have to be ...idened". Mr. Strand should try to enter Route 25 in Cutchogue during the tourist season. Another point of conern to me is the effect that such a concentration of people ...ill have on our supply and quality of ...ater, and ho... ...ill our ...ater be affected by such a concentration of se...age disposal necessitated by such a densit,y of people. Mr. Murphy, I kno... that progress marches on,. changes take place, but the changes should not be allo...ed on such a drastic scale against the ...ishes of the residents of the area. The area ...ill be so congested ...ith people and automobiles that notwithstanding Mr. Strandls statement, there ...ill be a demand to ...iden Route 25. Cutchogue ...ill become like Western Suffolk and Nassau Counties. If Seacroft is built there is nothing to prevent the owners fro. sub-letting the condos to people to ...hom the character of Cutchogue means nothing except a place to have a good time. The area ...ill become like the South Fork. Seacroft ...ill be the first foot in the door, and precedence ...ill have been set for more condominiums and stores - possibly in the vacant area ...hich Mr. Nolan says "cm be used for vineyards or orchards". Nancy Sa...astyno...icz has organized a meeting opposing the condos ....hich ...as held on Monday, May 21st. There are many, many Cutchogue residents besides myself ...ho are upset and oppose the condos and ...ill do everything possible to reverse the Town Board's approval of this project. Mr. Murphy, all the help you and your good office can give us to stop the Seacroft project ...ill be greatly appreciated. (~.?~ '.,7.,. -~ ~'.'A ftt\';L.. Respectfully yours, <~E~) La...rence E. Doodson ~f~g.- 1f'''''.[M'''' --::: /0(0 , ". _~._~~._.,.?? PJ-? .~ c<?'-- 7p'c q--, /,/ u;-- ,:... . . . , .' '. '"- '; " lJUN 1 1984 TWOMEY. L; \M de SHEA ...TTOR' 4T LAW THOM"'S A TWOME.. Jill STEPHEN e LATHAM JOHN P SHE.... III ROeERT D. PI.. CHRISTOPHER D tC.lELLEY AMY e. TURNER 33 W.EST SECOND STREE.T P. O. .OX 3.. RI\'EHHF.AU. NEW YORK UllOl , c~mll 727.2'.0 8 NORTH M...IN .TRElET EAST HAMPTON. N..,. 11831 ISUSI 324.'200 ~ay 31, 1984 Robert w, Tasker, Esq. Southold Town Attorney 425 Main Street Greenport, N.Y. 11944 ReI SEORA Requirements por Seacroft Condominium Site Plan Application Dear Mr. Tasker: As you may have heard, this office represents 50S, a group of neighhors an~ concerned citizena who live in the area of the proposed l60-unit, CO-acre Seacroft condominium development. I am writing to set forth in detail .y client's request concerning coapliance with the State Environmental Ouality Review Act (SEORA) as, when and if the developers file a site plan with the Town Planning Board. As you may be aware, the developers of the Seacroft Condomini~ project have had a presubmission conference with the Southold Town Planning Board. I have also hear~, but not confir~ed, that memhers of the Planning Board have inspected the aite, itself. When the formal site plan is filed with the Planning Board, the applicants will be requesting approval of the Planning Board for the exact configuration of their proposed development. The issuance of Planning Board site plan approval and the resultant permits is discretionary for the Planning Board and based on the standards set forth in SlOO-131 of the 7.oninq C~e of the Tnwn of Routhold. As such, the approval of the Town Planning Board is an -action- un~er the Environmental Conqervation Law an~ the rules and regulations implemented thereunder. In p~rticular, ~61'.2 of the regulations rlefines an -action- as including -(I) projects or physcial activities, such as construction or other activitieR, which change the use or appearance of any natural ,~ I...J I. , . .'. . . -2- . resollrce or st rllcture wh ich . . . ( ~) reqll i ra. on~ nr ",ora permits from an agency or agencies.- Further, the site [>lan a[>provAl proce'l'l is not an Me'lempt actionM unoer S617(2). Rather, the pro[>osed approval of a lfiO-unit condo- minium fall'l 'lql1arely under the regulAtion" rle,<crihinq a MType 1M action. ~ore particulArly, ~6l7.l2(bl(5)(ii) 'ltates Mthe following actionR are Type 1 if they are directly undertaken, funded, or approved by an agency,. . .(5) construction of new residentiAl units which meet or exceed the following thresholds. . .(ii) 50 units not to be connected (at commencement of habitation) to com- Munity and publicly owned utilities.- (Emphasis added.) As a Type 1 action, the approval is one of those that is -considered more likely to require an environ- ",ental impact statement than other actionsM (see ~6l7.l2). In particular, S6l7.6 controls the designa- tion of lead agency and determination of 'lignificance for Type 1 actions. Section 6l7.6(b) specifically man- dates that MAn EAF shall be completed for every Type 1 action which is directly undertaken, funded, or approved by an agency unless an acceptable draft tIS hilS already been or will be prepared on the action.- As you will discern fro~ the record, no draft environmental impact statement has been prepared on this action, or for that matter, on any aspect of the project whatsoever. As you are undoubtedly aware, the purposes of the State Environmental Ouality Review Act is to -incorpor- ate the consideratton of environmental factors into the planning, review and decision-making processes of. . . local government agencies at the earliest possible time. To accomplish this goal, SEQRA requires that all agen- cies determine whether the actions they will directly undertake, fund or approve may have a significant effect on the environment and if it is determined the action may have a significant effect, to prepare or requrest an environmental impact statement.M S617.1. I am aware that when the zoning change on the property was granted, an environmental assessment form was filed, and the Town Roard on that prior action determined that there would be no significant impact on the envirnnmenL As YOIl can see from the attacherl , .. '. , . . -J- . corresponc1ence that we have f?rwarc1erl to you, the actual project itself, both in its original and apparently new anc1 changec1 form, is going to create it far greater i~- pact than that which woulc1 be discerned from a thorough reading of the original environmental assessment form. r would reiterate that the current special permit applieation is a rlifferent action from the zoning approval and must be judged on its own ~erits. However, I would eommend to your reading the original environ- mental assessment form, particularly, the disturbingly inadequate candor contained in the applicants' evalua- tion of the project's impact on open apace, traffic, population, scenie vistas, farmland, anrl other existing ecological features of the area just north of the Hamlet of Cutchogue. We would ask that you consider these things and ac1vise the Town Planning Roard aceorilingly. I woulrl, naturally, he interested in obtaining a eopy of any opinion which you might render which is not subject to the attorney/client privilege. r look forward to hearing from you in any event, and if you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to eall. Sincerely, ~.~ Robert n. Pike RDP: jo CC I 80S Meabers of Town Planning Board '. . . JUN 4 1984 'f ,. .. P. O. Box 550 2495 Highland Road Cutohogue, N.Y. 11935 M~ 31, 1984 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Planning BGard Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, N. Y. 11911 Dear Mr. Orlowski! I want to go on the reoord as being opposed to an event which seems to be going forward like a steamroller in spite of the displeasure and opposition of the reSidents, homeowners and taxp~ers of Cutchogue. I IiIll referring to the proposed "Seacroft Condominiums in Cutchogue. f.fy wife and I ohose Cutchogua to build our retirement home because we feU in love with the rural, peaceful and unhurried oharacter of the area. Now the moneYJllakers want to change the areals character into another South Fork or Western Suffolk with its traffic and peo:!>le congestion. In the FaU of 1983 Mr. Gron and Mr. Nolan made a presentation to the Mattituck Senior Citizens Club at the peconic Senior/Youth Center. Of course, nobody was very happy at the idea of haVing condominiums in the midst of our homes. Messrs. Gron and Nolan presented an architeot's sketch showing 160 units in clusters of four units to be built on 46 acres behind the Sacred Heart Catholic Church in autchogue. This seemed to mean approximately four units (one cluster) to an acre. It was presented as a Retirement Community for persons over the age of 55. Messrs. Cron and Nolan expressed concern for those people who had grown old, perhaps widowed, who could no longer financially maintain the big older homes they had lived in. No children under 19 years of age were to be allowed to reside in the condominiums and the community was going to have a security gate. My objection, as well as those of many others to the project is the concentration of 160 to 300 people and automobiles in the heart of beautiful "Down town au tchogue" , I might add at this point that the developers succeeded in having the property rezoned for condominiums by the Southold Town Board even though the Planning Board had. rejected the plan. Then on April 12, 1984 I read in THE TRAVELER WATClftVlAN where the developers of the project had presented preliminary sketch plans to the Southold Planning Board which have significant changes from the original proposal. The latest proposals arel t\, . .1-iv~. . /'C'Ih' '. '+.,"\ ! . l ' ~ . \\ "" "----' "f'\'-..: \ '.:..! \ . . ~, .\\U.) ,-.-.- 1,-1 v ~. " . . P. O. Box 550 2495 Highland Road Cutchogue, N. Y. 11935 J Ull 4 ,,:-,~,., ~1: !.,;' '-;.~. l1ay 31, 1984 Mr. David Emilita, Town Planner Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Hr. Emili tal I want to go on record as being Opposed to an event which seems to be going forward like a steamroller in spite of the displeasure and opposition of the residents, homeowners and taxp~ers of Cutchogue. I IiIll referring to the proposed "Seacraft C9ndominiums" in Cutchogue. ~ wife and I chose Cutchogue to build our retirement home because we fell in love with the rural, peaceful and unhurried character of the area. Now the moneymakers want to change the area's character into another South Fork or Western Sui'folk wi.th its traffic and people congestion. In the Fall of 1983 Mr. Cron and Mr. Nolan made a presentation to the Mattituck Senior Citizens Club at the Peconic Senior/Youth Center. Of course, nobody was very happy at the idea of having condominiums in the midst of our homes. Messrs. Cron and Nolan presented an architect's sketch showing 160 units in clusters of four units to be built on 46 acres behind the Sacred Heart Catholic Church in Cutchogue. This seemed to mean approximately four units (one cluster) to an acre. It was presented as a Retirement Community for persons over the age of 55. Messrs. Cron BJld Nolan expressed concern for those people who had grown old, perhaps widowed, who could no longer financially maintain the big older homes they had lived in. No"children under 19 years of age were to be allowed to reside in the condominiums and the cOlIIJIIUni ty was going to have a security gate. My objection, as well as those. of man.V others to thl' project is the concentration of 160 to 300 people and automobiles in the heart of beautiful "Down town Cu tchogue" . I might add at this point that the developers Succeeded in having the' property rezoned for condominiums by the Southold Town Board even though the Planning Board had rejected the plBJl. Then on April 12, 1984 I read in THE TRAVELER WATCHMAN where the developers of the project had presented preliminary sketch plans to the Southold Planning Hoard which have significant changes from the original proposal. The latest proposals arel ., "-'A -".<'/' \ ,i ~ v , (r,,~, "\c,, ~ \ ',./ i j' i vv,C"_. ", . . , Mr. David Emilita, Town Planner JlJN 4 ,> 1984 -2- MIlV' 31, 1984 1. 36 to 37 acres to be left open and could be used as "vineyards or orchards if the association of owners at the project want it" ac?ording to Mr. Nolan. 2. on 10 acres: (a) 160 condominium units (b) About 50,000 square feet of store space (c) Parking space for 433 oars for the shopping plaza (d) Age of the residents now reduced from "55" to 45-55". THE TRAVELER WATCHMAN quotes a Mr. Strand, a traffic engineer, of "assuring the Board that Route 25 would not have to be widened". Mr. Strand should try, to enter Route 25 in Cutchogue during the tourist season. Another point of concern to me is the effect that such a concentration of people will have on our supply and quality of water, and how will our water be affected by such a concentration of sewage disposal necessitated by such a densit,y of people. Mr, Emilita, I Imow that progress marches on, changes take place, but the changes should not bi! allowed on such a drastic scale against the wishes of the residents of the area. The area will be so congested with people and automobiles that, notwithstanding Mr. Strand's statement, there will be a demand to widen Route 25. Cutchogue will beoome like Western Suffolk and Nassau Counties. If Seacroft is built there is nothing to prevent the owners from sub-letting the condos to people to whom the character of Clltchogu8" _ans nothing except a place to have a good time. The area will beoome like,lthe South ,Fork. ,SeaoroftwilL'be the first foot in the door, and precedenoe will have been set for more condominiums and stores - possibly in the vacant area which Mr. Nolan says "can be used for vineyards or orchards". Nancy Sawastynowicz had organized a meeting OPposing the condos which Was held on Monday, May 21st. There are many, m~ Cutchogue residents besides mwself who are upset and oppose the condos and will do everything possible to reverse the Town Board's approval of this project. Mr. Emili ta, all the help you and your good office can give us to stop the Seacroft project will be greatly appreciated. Respectfully yours c- '~/~~'1 ~awrence E. Doodson ' , \ ", I . '\ J. . . l'! ~I 'i ',"8J 'j .'.-; . .\, oJ .. 'f Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Cha.irman Southold Planning Board -2- M~ 31, 1984 1. 36 to 37 acres to be left open and could be used as "vineyards or arohards if the association of owners at the project want it" according to Mr. Nolan. 2. On 10 acres: (a) 160 oondominium units (b) About 50,000 square feet of store space (c) Parking spaoe for 433 cars for the shopping plaza (d) Age of the residents now reduced from "55" to 45-55". THE TRAVELER WATCllNAN quotes a Mr. Strand, a traific engineer, of "assuring the Board that Route 25 would not have to be widened". Mr. Strand should try to enter Route 25 in Cutchogue during the tourist season. Another point of conoern to me is the effect that such a concentration of people will have on our supply and quality of water, and how will our water be affected by such a concentration of sewage disposal necessitated by such a density of people. Mr. Orlowski, I know that progress marches on, changes take place, but the changes should not be allowed on such a drastic scale against the wishes of the residents of the area. The area will be so congested with people and automobiles that notwithstanding Mr. Strand's statement, there will be a demand to widen Route 25. Cutchogue will become like Western Suffolk and Nassau Counties. If Seacroft is built there is nothing to prevent the owners from sub-letting the condos to people till whom the character of Cutchogue means nothing except a place to have a good time. The area will become like the South Fork. Seacroft will be the first foot in the door, and precedence will have been set for more condominiums and stores - possibly in the vacant area which Mr. Nolan s~s "can be used for vineyards or orchards", Nancy Sawastynowicz has organized a meeting opposing the condos which was held on Monday, May 21st. There are many, many Cutchogue residents besides myself who ars upset and oppose the oondos and will do everything possible to reverse the Town Board's approval of this project. Mr. Orlowski, all the help you and your good office can give us to stop the Seacroft project will be greatly appreciated. Respectfully yours. tl~ Iii (7) . . JUN 1 1984 TWOMEY. LATHAM & SHEA THOMAS A. TWOMEY. JR. STEPHEN B. LATHAM JOHN F. SHEA. III ROBERT O. PIKE CHRISTOPHER D. KELLEY AMY B. TURNER REc::~,.n:D ATTORNEYS AT LAW 33 WEST SECOND STREET P. O. BOX 398 RIVERHEAD. NEW YORK 11901 (516) 727-2180 9 NORTH MAIN STREET EAST HAMPTON, N.Y. 11937 IS'S} 324-1200 ..'~.1 " ,;:Y-t May 31, 1984 T~;',,~ L: ';~( .~:,,~::;~:')!d Judith Terry Town Clerk Town of Southold i Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Petitions of SOS Against Seacroft Condominium Development Dear Mrs. Terry: Attached hereto you will find a number of petitions and photocopies of petition cards in opposition to the Seacroft Condominium Developnent. I wouln ask that you file these an~ make note of their receipt in the official minutes of the Town Board. I am aware of your prior correspondence with Miss Nancy Sawastynowicz and the Town Attorney's opinion con- tained therein. Should the Town Attorney continue to advise you not to accept delivery, I would ask that he provide the citation to any law, any case, or any con- stitutional provision whatsoever that would enable the Town to refuse to allow citizens of the Town of Southold to petition their grievances against a legislative act of the Town Board pursuant to their right of Free Speech secured and protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. - G?~,~ Robert O. Pike RDP:jo encs. cc: SOS (~\6\1\~\ . ( . ( May )0, 1984 NAY ,'29 i1:984 Town of Southold Planning Boar.d Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11979 Dear Southold Town Planning Board: I am very concerned over the changes of the "Senior Citizen community Seacroft" ;for Cutchogue. With the developers lowering the age with no hard and fast rule as to minimum age) The impact on the Town will be far greater. Please require that a full Environmental Impact Statement be prepared. Nothing was ever mentioned about the lighting of the project. It is unthinkable to have a project of this size without an E.I.S. The current sight plan is a perversion of the current Master Plan of the Hamlet of Cutchouge. The density is eight times higher then other areas here. Its an impact on the neighborhood and should be taken as such. Our Town goverment should require that a full Environmental Impact Statement be prepared, To ensure that a rational alternative to this project, highly compatible with the neighborhood, is developed and considered by ,our Town fathers. Thank you, .... ; @!vaJr~ ~ ~.ub~ 71/~ //f3S-- ~: ~N 1 1984 . Marilyn Sawastynowicz Alvah's Lane Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 May 30, 1984 Southold Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 To the Planning Board, I have recently been made aware of the changes in the Seacroft proposed retirement community for Cutchogue. The developers got the zone change on the project being as a retirement community minimum age 55 years. The town Board said there would not be an effect on the environment should the project be implemented as planned. At the presubmission conference the project was changed to set the age lower for people who wanted to retire earlier and no hard and fast rule as to minimum age. With that change alone the impact to Cutchogue will be far greater. Please take a close look at the traffic report Seacroft had done. It is based on retired persons, most people don't retire until there 60's. A new traffic report needs to be drawn up. A Environmental impact statement completed. I love my Town, I've traveled across the county" and I liked it best here. Please see the possible negative impacts that Seacroft will bring with the lowering of the age. Thank you, /)I~ J&<b"1s'o A~\ #~\ . . ( CUtt'''l;~',:.J.(~, N. 'f.. ,',iCloY J, l'Jo:A ,1 '}3j JUN 4 1984 '::1'. Fraui{'"urplly, "'O'~' ' -r ....u. ."urJer\' l.sor 30utnold 'l'ownBoard Soutllold, N. Y. 11'171 Ded.r \1:,. ',rurphy: 1 at C.Jnced tne "lectin,;; to t'~uucrott COfldoa.'1 nav~ lo~ cost !lousins las t ~,jonda.:r, lei.}' 21s t, in ~tlorel; -iB ~~ CO:1':18:lL lil'lcro in Cutch'h;UEl"OI C",tc",o,:uo in 1'e!erorK "/lollld".l'ou ral.lle1' I a;n ~"L'in~in. i;j,is to '{:Jur "lttenti',Hl, 1<3 I 11v~ in 'i 10, CODt home anO 1 1>0",1d 1i,,0 to d.now wlw.t is wron.; .1it," Ic)'!., cont r,ousin~? 1 live in CutcllOt;Ue on'lci,ool ,joUGO ,'~oHcl i.n a 10',1 cost nounin..; neiCllhol'1.0od and I li::l vcr:r il.ap~lJ' !Iud ;>!'o;.;.d and tll8lll':l"cll to God for ;,llowing ,,1e to live llere. I "Jl flurc that ::lY 'lOllle in n01; a (jin",rdce to anyono i:l Cutch05ue and I tnanr. God tor ~le8sin~; :::0 '"itu tue neir;r,bo!',; l~nHt J W1VO, fln I l'lve tne'1 oIl. Yes, 1,,1;1 tmlnict"ll ;;0 GOd far ttlO low CO.3 t; JElclSin", , ..:>ec:. ~l.,e if 1 t w~sn't for t~e lo~ cost nouDin~, I ~()uld non be livin0 an welfare. I a~l >;lore if the poor .,;ere c.:iVdll tile c"lme Clnr,ce t, ut I ',V1S :;iven, t,iere dQuld oe less c1'i'.1e Bud weltal'c ill SOl.ltilold 'rowa. 1 feel tlla t oar' c'd Id1'cn and s'ci:lnd ci,ih\ren s:lOuld l;e ~i ven tl:e cr"~.Jce to :,set, 3tlea:i ir; tnis world. II Tce :Jn1,y int(~:I'eat tH3 t, tae c\?velopt:n:'u r::J.ve is .:'!one.'f. lli.1u lOCH1.! peo;,le cr.) ;1,1 n'Jt afford to buy I:;,ooe l1oilleo, BO WIlY o~'ins Il:l,y;nore pe0;}le fro::l the outGido t let liS li:OOf) Cutcno6ue tnu ','.,'{J.:-Y it is. r'rlliU~ l.J;......:.iD ,-,.i~'\~{d 'I dE Chi UF ':'di.:; .p~).jn" Yes, iIe lovf!u 1.1;;:, :{ll !'.ind it ./0 .,ce OOllnd to,;et:;wr in di:,; love, 1;""re \1OtlL! bel tore CC;lcern for e:'CIl atner. Trwre ,Ire ,'HflV o.i.dol' I)"o;)le rihO 'Ird livin,_' alone t:j,;.~t C~lIJIl0t; afford to live in tli..)H COLd;. tlO,..Lf;en, :L:. tiley ar'o not aula to ;-;:1) for l"he hic;h cost; of t'uel '1,i.H.1 td.Xe~1. i CU~l1.l0L ~,e9 t 't1~lY Lney ~ -\nnOj .dve lOtl cont i,lJ)u.S~Il~J to uelp lJH~C::. out. 1 li.ve .le,1 e l~La ~3.i.t;e oi' L.!iC ;;.rv; o~led lh,) ,;:lit Gond0u U:-ld iJ,Y "laln C::)flccrn 1s about; Cne rll.l.~llity D.!' ;:._:'tcr t.ll:-i.t I Hill De fareed to arin.c. 1 c"~nnot conceive no'l'l "1!1,yi.;f)~1>y ,";JuJJ C~ll:"~ to l.i.v~ i~l -~ lud Unit GO!l,io Jevelop;;cnt ~,ltt; W'iter 'lr')oh",g a,; tr.e~: an} 'In." I reel tl,."t t!lOY sl~oulci l;)o'C aJ.lead i:lclud~n~; the :;ouL.;,old 12'JVlrl l-~OUI'd. 1 prl..."t t) God, tC.it i.l{~ will CLOW tL.e ~;o:.ltcold 'l'O,'Il Bouru. Ntiat is ri":1',t ''i!',d overt,!rn the Zone G.,,,n~e, tLe developer:; received lust J ,11.1 fr'o;:i tne ~o't;n l~o:l rod. .',~,\ '1. . ~OD J3T.E.:) 'feU .\L-L. Conj GCd~ l,o ;j~lJ.:-L:JtL U['lT~:~.-:.i L'l:Junin~ Board Ghalrl:i~Cl r-ro--.Jl 1_1-,1C'11 'rrl.,j,;'1t'- :'/01-'-, &~,. -~~ (/ . - . / . . HAY 29 1984 c-opy Route 2, Box 161L Cutchogue, NY 11936 ; Mr. Frank Murphy Supervisor, Town of Southold T own Hall Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Murphy: I am one of many concerned citizens who are appalled at the Seacroft plan to construct 160 (or a similar number) of condominiums in the center of Cutchogue. While I recognize the rights of land owners to develop their land, at the same time the impact on their surroundings must be equally considered. It reminds me of some of the early western land owners who would dam a stream on their land for their own use while neighbors down- stream suffered the consequences. I understand that an environmental impact study is required by law before a project like Seacroft can be carried out. This study should be scrutinized very closely, regarding who prepares it and its objectivity. Just a few of the obvious concerns are: 1. Demands on the fragile water table of such a project. 2. Related to the above- sewage disposal provisions. 3. Living unit density per acre. (As John Wickham points out, Seacroft, in its concentrated boundaries, would almost double the number of residential units now existing along the whole length of Main Road through Cutchogue.) 4.Increased demands on roads and streets (already overloaded in the summer season), because of the cars of the 160 dwelling units in a single complex. 5.Greatly increased demands for police and fire services. 1 readily understand that the increased taxes that would be paid to the Town are enticing, but there certainly must be far better alternatives for land use than this, and they should be looked into thoroughly. In my opinion, the project is patently disastrous to one of the nicest hamlets on the North Fork. SPJ.rell:f) e -fJC:1~r :\_______ Robert P. Long Q (A Town taxpayer for 17 years). Copies sent to other members of the Town Council , )-, ~'J....l I) i . . May 28, 1984 JlJN 4 !S'84 Planning Board of Southold Town Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Planning Board; I am very alarmed over the changes in the Seacroft condominium proposal for Cutchogue. It was granted the zone change for a " Senior Citizen Community". Now that there is no hard and fast rule as to minimum age, the impact on Cutchogue but of course will much greater. Please do not take this lightley. Such a large impact on our Town should have a Environmental Impact Statement done. One that is not based on Senior Citizens but the worst possible impact to our Town, which ,could happen now that the age has been lower. The traffic report based on retired persons and single person occupants will now be misleading with the drop in age. Please think about the impact to Cutchogue this high-density condo will be and require that a Environmental Impact Statement be prepared. Thank you for your consideration. G Very truly yours, ~r?~ 1Y/~ I{~' ~a;PJ ~ ~7~~ / ~L--v<- J, c/ , . -,(l~, . . ;'If ~ 1...."\ " 'I ' ,f- "J! ,~-H P . i' I . ( . ( MAY 2 9 J984 P.O. Box 1040 Cutchogue, N.Y. May 28,1984 Dear Mr. Orlowski, We are taxpaying residents of Cutchogue. My wife and I moved here in September, 198). We thought we were moving to a fine rural community rich in traditional American values. We were greatly shocked by the way the Town Board rejected a 900 person petition against the building of Seacroft. In a community of this size, the opinions of 900 people should not be ignored. Seacroft continues to concern us for several reasons: high density, added traffic, sewage, water, and the least easy to quantify - quality of life. Before any further approvals are given to Seacroft an Environ- mental Impact Statement should be done. We hope you join with us in our concern that Seacroft is not allowed to destroy the Character, way of life, and natural environment of your fine old town. S'i:;~";)! ~/HJ~ ).)~,,- Mr. and Mrs. William McNiven . .--, . ( . ( MAY 2 9 1984 May 27, 1984 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11979 To the Planning Borad of Southold Town: In regard to the Seacroft Condo for Cutchogue, I have been made aware of all the changes in the development plans and feel the changes of the age limit will have a much greater impact on the environment. How could the board consider this proposal without knowing in advance what the implications are about sewage. This condo will be over the East ends largest water supply which we should treat as precious natural resource. With the high-density Seacroft will bring, we request the Planning Board require a Environmental Impact Statement be prepared. It is obvious that the "Senior Citizen Community" Seacroft got its zone change on has changed. J~~;;::W~acPS~ ( . ( NAY 2ti.4 ( May 27, 1984 Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Southold Town Planning Board: I am writting in regard to the "Seacroft" condominium proposal just north of Cutchogue Hamlet. With all the changes the developers have made at the presubmission conference all has changed. With no hard and fast rule as to minimum age the impact on the environment will far greater. The original E.A.F. form is no good. A new traffic analysis needs to be drawn up. The old one is based on retired persons and single person occupants, widows and widowers. Please take a close look a the promblems this huge high-density condominium development will bring to our Town and require that a full Environmental Impact Statement be prepared. Our Town is facing a very crucial time with all the development pressure and its important to do it right with out misleading data. Thank you, 3~1(~ a' . -~-- ~,,".' -~ '....- ,.' """I) ~<"I' - , -- . . ,+, o -- - A1:-UJL'v; MAY 291984 .!ip0 -J -IL.(f'/~J--~t:: /~ fr", S {; .. J tL~<... J7CU/L . ../"If xf." . r:;) , ~-c...:t)-./ 'f-() rT't.L _ c." Lt.-r- \..j/7.L.<...-~ ~f'-t all.. ....b1L,"L.~~'7'~.'-'lJ~~r~ . /liow~11<-/~l ,,-- .:UL4tr .J;[<tJ-y ci,vt-"'o- .~ k, . At, .1 t&n~ 9/ 1.....l_A,f-.jd,Y;4L-<--:G iJ~ ,'-.~ -' J".-'---'L..t....()L..... - II ' (j 4)LL.--LtL _{~ tf..')LC b ~ w~ ~ ';'''VY>>/':U rJ. CjLJ,~/~ _ (J) 2.... f!~tj'.2. -L ~";v-,h:j . -- -- ~_._._- ---~.~----- . >lkTimes ( no matter wh8t's she doing. More power to her." Her family may have been drained by the campaign, but Mrs. Cochran was not. "I'd love to go out there again tomorrow," she said. .!'II love campaigning. I find it exhilarating and challenging. " . . . The defeat was a tough one for the Southold Democrats, who sorely wanted to achieve a 3-3 break on the Town Board. But party leader Bill Grigonis was philosophical: "We knew this was a rough one going in... they just didn't want .. shina... -:1\""". Fl,.\.ll1.... (..t~l tlie su olltTimes ~OC~8~~77-9824 r _ ~XPERIE~:-l"~i~ r OPEN DA~~:V FOR ~~~AKFAST.lUNCH AND DINN~ "'., I ORIAL DAY WEEKEND SPECIALS · SAT. SUN. &:MON. :'ETE DINNERS I LUNCHEON SPECIALS : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $8.95 Lasagna i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $9.95 with salad & garlic bread....... $3.95 $ 9 Lobster Roll. . . . . . . . . . .. $350 .................. 8. 5 PlusBlackboardSpecial'- . Lobster, Riba. Chicken .. r)1...~ L J'f with crabmNt. ....... ~ I Bleu.. . .. .. .. .. . . $ . ...........$. "^:'." May'24,11ll ~ . to give up control. It may take five or years to break up this thing (the G( majority) but we will." The evening began on a bright note, Mr. Bednoski won the first four distri, reported. But as the Southold resu began to be tallied, the mood at t Tolendal Inn in Mattituck began darken. Mr. Bednoski, Supervisor Fra Murphy and Mr, Grigonis all critici, recent newspaper coverage of the To Board and bemoaned the fact that ~ Bednoski had not been endorsed by ; local papers.' "The people spoke," Mr. Murphy s" "but the lack of newspa! endorsements hurt." "I'm concerned about news cover~ of town meetings," Mr. Grigonis told crowd." "I don't like it, and unless th are some Ch8nges there's going to b battle in town." Then, as he wall away, he said, "They're lying bastard "I guess this means a healthy t( board is no good," Mr. Bednoski sai guess one of the reasons I lost is beca I'm a man instead of a woman. B' can't do anything about that." "We still have Frank Murphy, F Stoutenburgh, Frank Kujawski and still a trustee. That's not bad." Murphy Laments Vote Mr. Murphy said that "in spite of lack of endorsements, people " impressed with John. But I'm sad t( that we didn't carry some of the dist that the Democrats h8ve worked so . to preserve." Later, he painte. election districts east of Arshamom, as especially disappointing becau, J~e party.s ~~~~~!q!!...!~C?rl~o_( .~}\._n May 24, l' Southold House Fir,/Probed SOUTHOLD -- The Suffolk County Arson Squad is investigating a fire in . which a two-story home on Soundview A venue burned to the ground last Friday night. Because of the fire's intensity in the garage area, authorities believe the blaze started there shortly before 10:45 p.m. The fire's origin is under investiga- tion. The Southold Fire Department . responded to the call and was aided on car she was driving allegedly str, three times the rear of an auto driven Edward S. Kruk, 39, of Main Bayvi Road, Southold. Charged was Lisa M. Falco, 23. Pol also charged her with driving an Ui sured and unregistered vehicle v. improper plates. The incident occur at 7:45 p.m. on Route 25 in CutchogUl Several area residents received ho tal treatment as a result of motor veh accidents.. ~ ~-i~!~ ';Attacr Seac~~ft Plan~ cuTCHOGUE - Some sat on petition with 900 names that was the foresight to see tha! 2 acres is hairs designed for five-year- submitted a year ago and sent needed to supply water for one ,Ids, others sat on the stage, back to Sawastynowicz would be family. He added that since this vhile many stood to vent their resubmitted to the town board. decision goes against the town's mger and concern over the One of the m~y Cutchogue two acre zoning, and the fact that ieacroft Condominium Project residents that spoke out against no EIS Is required leaves the hat they claim threatens the the project was John Wickham, action by the town board, "sub- ,Ieeply, bucolic lifestyle of the who was formerly the town's ject to challenge." tiamlet of Cutchogue. Approxl- planning board chairman for 24 Pat Dorman, of Cutchogue, nately 140 people packed them- years. He said, "160 units in the one of approxlmately three who ,elves into the auditorium of the little village of Cutchogue would spoke in favor of the project, West Cutchogue School on Depot do irreparable damage to the pointed out that since it was a Lane to find out how to stop the village of Cutchogue." He point. retirement community, where no project. ed out that the Suffolk: County children under the aile of 19 Some residents of the area are Planning Board contends that one would be allowed to reside. it ::oncerned that the 16O-unit con- acre is needed to supply enough would be . l>99!!. tl!. t.!l!l. Il:h!!ol dominium project on 47 acres ground water for one family, and district of CutchollUe. He also would tax the area's water sup- the town board has recently had - (<;:Ontlnued 00 ra~ 2f ply, and also create a greater I.. " . .,ii . . amount of traffic coming into the - -'"" ... hamlet changing the quality of I life. Although the town board approved a zone change from residential to multiple housing clearing the way for the project to go ahead last July 19, Nancy I Sawastynowicz, chairwoman of ' the group calling itself Southold- ers Opposed to Seacroft, said the request of an addition of a possible shopping center and a decrease in the minimum age for the retirement community from 55 to 45 to 50 years of age have "alarmed" residents. She had attempted a year ago to submit petitions with 900 residents op- posed to the project. and speak to the town board, but was told no further evidence could be consid- ered because the public hearing was closed. Attorney for the group, Robert Pike, told the audience that while the original zone change decision could not be overturned, due to the amount of time that passed. he dicl say the grOup was going to ask the planning board to require an environmental impact state- ment to. be filed. Pick said that the value of an EIS is, that it requires the developer to come up with alter- nate ways of developing the site. He said that if the planning board did not require an EIS the group would petition the town board to re-zone the property back to what it was or Usomething better." Pike also said that the group was putting the town board and planning board on notice that the project goes against the recom- mendations of the current master s nlan. He also said that the Pi -- 1- :.~ Resid~nts I 19B4 ,+.,;t - . h Seacroft Condominium project. Nearly 140 John Wickham (right) speaks ou~ ~t~o~d:rs Opposed to Seacroft chaired by NanCy Idents showed up .at a meeting R bert Pike (left). . wastynowicz (center) and 50s L.a~r 0 . -. union atld found that developers, ~d it would be beneficI~1 to the . 'have wrecked every single place wing elderly population w~o in America and they'U do it .to tIe finding out they cannot mam- " lain their large old ho~es and YO~~uncilman Paul Stouten- ~ant a place that requires lo~- bur h, who attended the meeting !maintenance. Donnan then said aI g ith Councilman Joseph lb. "t if the project was not aUowed ong wd d Town Justice Ray- . I I Townsen an '^ go through the posslb eater- d Ed ds told those as- I"'" . h' mon war, inative was low mcome ousmg. bled that they came to listen, 1,_Daniel Lyons, of .New Suffolk, ~:~ did not promise anything a ened the condommlum project b h said "these things . . " L .d that ecause e, . an "mvaslon. yons S81 e ve complicated." He said e has been to every state of the ~at ~ town board are just laymen and have to rely on the town .attorney's judgment as to what they can and cannot do because people are always. "looking to put you on the stand in court." .. Pike said that since the project as proposed is not planning to have a sanitation system ~ tate care of the septic wastes it will have a hard time passing the Sufolk County Department of Health. But he suggested to the people gathered, that if they are opposed to the project to write or visit the Southold Town Board and the Southold Planning Board. He also sugge~ed writing the new town planner. . At the end of the meeting the organizers were accepting dona- tions of 525 and 5SO to fund the battle against the Seacroft condo- minium project. -Bm J_ . . MAY 251984 ~ 5/Q.'5/84 ~~ 'hE: 5/~3/tY 'Bo~ .,2C1S- Vlu..u Sv~~\~ t-- I. 1 t qstJ 1lM\Y\~j ~a.ycl c.t-ta..Ar'YV\ON\.. 6d owslt - . t ctIv\A- ~Lt4 -+z, \€. t- l{ c-\) ~6 W 0(- V1Mf o,RV(> (Ov\ce'"" ovurfu plOl"".e~ '5ea.C~Cl{+- ~('C>6ecr ~{ G>-kho~. T +-etl 'v~ INlVl ~,;;hcd~ .... Q ~-k,y +vu chw~kV' ~ <2Nv$\,~ of tv~6~, -:r ~ <JV\..L of q lJD 6 ~ rt C; l d tvJ3 \tJ"n.D Ovrl 6ft'ose~ ~~, frb ~~ct Ov~ uJVLo ~ (Lot- b~ ~M-d.. I ~l Yh-~. of MH' 1-o\A.W\ boOJr& O~h.cloJS ()..k-L Vvvv"" \ Itt.c\ & ~cJ. Q~~J~_ VvJ.trt.~ ~ CJvv.J... VlO t ~ ~ \.J\rI.,~d-::> 0(:.- 't-kQ ~~r\t. ...u-- 15, cU";<6v-a.ce.?u \ ~(,\.t- 60( eJ.eckJ. o{:h~(Cl.ls ~ VLoT ~ct~eA..,~~ $s. ~ I{ "- 11'\orn- -+of\.UVVv ~ cit,wJ~B cf _ '+iUs ~ 't-e 5Jft ~ \(tot- ~~\-Ccl , 'f'\r\l~ W-u... w-w bl (\J w$. -,-- ~ uy~nJ .t{o~~ ~ -h Utit-C:V L~ ~CAr\Jft.m~ '-(\;0>) f ~ CMA..A. d UM.lUt\.G\ %0\. -\--0 ~Y\. 'Lv\. Vt V1rh vneJ \MVf<l.d- ~4-~t- \?~ (f~ostd.. :=r hG..vl \Q:-tk. ~ m~ YY\td~Vr\ds ) <s~~\^SA f't.-t1.+tcm, W ~l-~ Vv\. ~ )t,~ ~ L\- ~e.utvL ';; -\0 ~~t- lo me- ' ~\ell,)t. ~>'l(:\.0.r ~ _Y"t.GM\.e +Or ~ 'Se~cxn~-'+- Q \~\-. \t- b.V\.o-IJ t ~ ~ ~ 'm.tV') c...tiY\Q. d VYu., L-k resr c}e..vJ;J I.Jv-\ ~ ~+- ~(QO. ~~~( , vt-~ Wwb , -' ~ c:- r( Ar '7i~~ ~ ~ . ~ MAy ~5 1984 0 0..,.,... "'. Af7 -~;;;, /-L /7<J- \l-" ~~:s ~ ~f~ RECE1VED ~..a.A~U~~ f~ ~ ';"5'C).34.' (I~.v~~~v7tl{ ~~ .,~j w .~ fUAAr- /. OU /1' i I !:J IiQ~_..._h '( - 'le..:~~~ ~- ~~'. .J.-~ ~-t;, d. ~~ 1;, . (Jrvv . ~ - ~ef7ae/U- ~~ ~ . . ~~ ~ hu~ L. ~f: ~( ~rt:., , ~.+-~~ ~ e.e,;r~ ~ - ~ . I J.-V bll- ~7 ,~~/~~, ~ ~~ ~~fc~ CiYL.L ~ ~ , . ( . ( MAY 25 1984 ~ 51Q.slBLf ~% bE: ........ 5/~3 jiy _ ...... ," ~)( .,2'1<) . Vl~ Su~~\1::- t I ------ ---- ---- ___.n_. _____ It liS{; --11amY\~i J30(tycl_~0v~ryn~j5dows,l{ -___. .. _u.. -____u_:t__~ -Vs-Y~ _~ let- l{ o-tJ ~6W 0(- vvvy__ ---$~"P _LWlCt, ""-ovur fu -pro .1' o>e.t. :'t€ ILC. ror+- ___ - <C 0 eel-,b { __Co -k.h.o 1s"'- . T J-ee.l "l-uW'Ll\ ~,t-l.C<<l~_.. - Q t-kv +VU_ch~yo-ckV'_~~\(\.~ Jt-v~~~ '__ __=r_~ ~of _~()()__n6~ re5,td_tkh\0irto Ovrt__ ----6f.posetA --h +vU.'-f~Cl i.l:ct OvVul-uJho <1.X't (lor_______ __b~ h.~(l,~.. I.. ~l Vh.~~of M>-V 1-cw-n ..U. _n boevr& O~h.CloJS _0vII~_~"" 1 v-td ..&h._re.oJ.Q9.kk__ ... .n~C;~ _ ~._ \(\Cltu~ ~ \Jv\.;~~J-::> C\~ fu . . .-:p,~r\t. n...Lt-- 1S cU<;.<6v-a.ct?-u. \ ~t\.t__~Qf 0eckcL___ u_ =~~t~~~~a~~1<ts~~~~ ~~{:~-frl~~ c. -~ \(Lot- M~\-t.J ,~SW~ W-U1 btu_(U~~.'~_ --h1t~~~~tN;c~~C4rt~~~_:ut'~~ n 'lNvvfO-e.\- s4~\..t-- \?~ ~~~d.. ~ ho.M.. b.tLk io VY\.~ YY\tt~d-5 ) <S~~M.~ r't,t-1.t-tcrm, \JJ r\-l~ . V'v\.~ )~~ ~ It ~eUivl~ -10 ~d- Lome, ~ \ e Il')t Co-V\s:u\. tv ~ _ v"e:V-n. e -+0 I ~ 'S e Q. CXlJ~ t- O .~~. h- '2>.hlrV t t\ ~y 1.0..~ O~tl'\ ctnLQ. d \f"rw L.k resr cttJ;J tM ~ 4r>~ ~LQc~. . . _un . ~u.yt~ I . . Vl-~ ~ <. ./7 _ ~ --'. (. HAY 45'~B4 'Y~;;. ~ ~ ~-/~~<cf- '{ - " ~~::5 f~ ~ i".~E~~iV~~. ~~~ ( ~~ r/''';' ,"5 ;.034 ~ ;74/ I J{) I ItQ~ _.._H '( - fl.e..., ~-r2 ~~ ~ -~r' __ .' .J.-.~ ~j;,.d. ~P' ~ ' ()evv ~~~ - ~-f7a~ &u~a~ . ~U?~ ~ M t1U~ qt.>- ~~ ~ ~( uTi::.. , ~~ .'f- ~~J2-. .' QYc..L I~ ee;r - ~ -;;;;q . -r ~ 1M 4~~ .~~/~ ~~. ~~ ~~~~ :jp--. , < . . '" l>e.. ~f>' e\' \-o-S ~ judgementA'iJ\'\ the short assesment :form. ':;:'1'.e Planning Board should be ao.vare of these 9Ll€S+:ono.61e.. ',+erns " vlheE +hey consider the s~bmittcd plans. 'rM~ " :3m lIe;,' '-V ) ague ./ " . } . . ,t;~ . ,-SrE/7 cl;t>O)': 7>' :'~ r;,~~; '1:0 > l; ".~f ':.; , '''.',;b,~.j 188A Alvah's Lane Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 May 7, 1984 \ : ,\' ;'1J, I _; ;;""1"'; i :~.....t.t- To the Southold Town Boards,. After reveiwing the Seacroft project I noticed many misinterpreted facts the developers have filed. In the minutes from the Public hearing Feb. 1,1983 Mr. Cron mentioned the importance of going into some historical background on this application. Back in 1974 an application was made with respect to this same parcel for a change of zone from "A" Residential Agricultural to Multiple Redidence. Cron clamed their examination of the application found that the request of 296 units would not be in the best interest of Cutchogue. He refered to the one fact on the Master Plan conception that there be no multiple residence between Mattituck and Southold, and this was supported by 85% of the people. Thats arguement enough against a change of zone to M-1. He never once mentioned all the objections to the project. Registered at a public hearing held on April 23, 1974. Mr. Cron misrepresented facts on his EAF form received Feb. 22, 1983. Seacroft is planning on a water pumping capacity of 220 gals/minute with a total useage of 32,000 gal/day. In the assessment form, significance is considered if there is a pumping capacity of greater than 45 gal/min., 20,000 gallons per/day. Obviously this will adversty affect the ground water. He checked no, the project won't affect surface or ground water quality. He did not consider the impact an influx of a particular age group with special needs. He overlooked the fact that the Village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5% of resident hUffian population. Based on Lilco's population estimates for the Cutchogue, New Suffolk Community . Page 2 . of 2,80) people, it is evident that Seacroft, with its 160 units, will increase the population by more than 5%. This is L a questionable judgment in the short assessment form. I have tried to speak against the project with a petition of 900 people. Mr. Cron opposed my right to speak. Iv'e been informed by my attorney my rights were violated. One has the right to petition the Town Board up to the minute theY decide as issue. It was illegal to return my petition. Why can so many serious things just be swept under the rug? Mr. Cron mentioned that there will be more than )6 acres of open space out of the total 47 acres. Id'e like to know where it exists? And how it can be farmed? His traffic analysis is based on the project being developed as an "adult community" with certain restrictions as to who may occupy the units ( at leats one adult over the age 55 in the family with a substantial number of retired persons and single person occupants, e.g. widows and widowers). At the night of the presubmission conference he lowered the age to 45 for people who wanted to retire earlier and there is no hard and fast rule as to minimum age which could be reduced again. The traffic analysis was not based on this new plan. Traffi~romblems in that area could develop into a serious promblem and should not be taken lightley. A complete evvironmental impact form should be required. After reveiwing the report from John J. Raynor, Civil Engineer, Feb. 1, 198). Its apparent he assumed that a community water supply system for Seacroft would be established, and use the design sewage flows of the Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services for Senior Citizen units. Its obvious it isn't going to be a Senior Citizen community. An environmental impact form should be completed. Mr. Crons professional engineer stated in the Feb. 1 hearing how the , , , ~ . . Page 3 Seacroft property is located near the center,. of the highest elevations of ground water on the North Fork. Its also true that Greenport already owns ground for pumping water on Alvah's Lane. With the Brecknock Hall condo project being approved and many more developments pending, this Cutchogue dome of water could be drawn down quickly. We should concider water supply a very important priority. The developers claim Mr. Villa discussed the requirements relative to a Senior Citizen project, that they have a slightly different water use requirement for a Senior Citizen type development. And once again I remind you he's lowering the age requirment so this information is all m,true for the new project. His facts given to the Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services are the Senior Citizen requirements. Also the sewage trearment system is based on the criteria for Senior Citizen housing. We must start thinking about the furture and water management program. Nothing was ever mentioned about lighting of this project. Will the lighting be brilliant and effect the surrounding areas? Why didn't this development Seacroft have to do an Enivornmental statement of the worst possible projects that could be built there, like the Dalchet zone change had to? There plans didn\ even have half the impact Seacroft could do. Seacroft is a mojor change to the town of Cutchogue and should not be taken lightly. I urge the Planning Board to require a full and comprehensive environmental review of the proposed development to help reduce the potential impact. I hope a public meeting will be held on this project so the people may add in the design process' to reduce the impact. Sincerely, Nancy Sawastynowicz ~1c~c.r- ~~ "j,- . '. . . HAY 7 1ge4 . . " 188A Alvah's Lane Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 May 7, 1984 To the Southold Town . Boards.l: - . - .- , After reve~wing the Seacraft project I noticed many misinterpreted facts the developers have filed. In the minutes from the Public hearing Feb. 1,1983 Mr. Cron mentioned the importance of going into some historical background on this application. Back in 1974 an application was made with respect to this same parcel for a change of zone from "A" Residential Agricultural to Multiple Redidence. Cron clamed their examination of the application found that the request of 296 units would not be in the best interest of Cutchogue. He refered to the one fact on the Master Plan conception that there be no multiple residence between Mattituck and Southold. and this was supported by 85% of the people. Thats arguement enough against a change of zone to M-1. He never once mentioned all the objections to the project. Registered at a public hearing held on April 23. 1974. Mr. Cron misrepresented facts on his EAF form received Feb. 22, 1983. Seacroft is planning on a water pumping capacity of 220 gals/minute with a total useage of 32,000 gal/day. In the assessment form, significance is considered if there is a pumping capacity of greater than 45 gal/min., 20,000 gallons per/day. Obviously this will adversty affect the ground water. He checked no, the project won't affect surface or ground water quality. He did not consider the impact an influx of a particular age group with special needs. He overlooked the fact that the ~<<A ~~~~ Village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5% of resident hunan population. Based on Lilco's population estimates for the Cutchogue, New Suffolk Community . Page 2 . of 2,80] people, it is evident that Seacroft, with its 160 units, will increase the population by more than 5%. This is a questionable judgment in the short assessment form. I have tried to speak against the project with a petition of 900 people. Mr. Cron opposed my right to speak. Iv'e been informed by my attorney my rights were violated. One has the right to petition the Town Board up to the minute th~ decide as issue. It was illegal to return my petition. Why can so many serious things just be swept under the rug? Mr. Cron mentioned that there will be more than ]6 acres of open space out of the total 47 acres. Id'e like to know where it exists? And how it can be farmed? His traffic analysis is based on the project being developed as an "adult community" with certain restrictions as to who may occupy the units ( at leats one adult over the age 55 in the family with a substantial number of retired persons and single person occupants, e.g. widows and widowers). At the night of the presubmission conference he lowered the age to 45 for people who wanted to retire earlier and there is no hard and fast rule as to minimum age which could be reduced again. The traffic analysis was not based on this new plan. Traffi~romb~ems in that area could develop into a serious promblem and should not be taken lightley. A complete evvironmental impact form should be required. After reveiwing the report from John J. Raynor, Civil Engineer, Feb. 1, 198]. Its apparent he assumed that a community water supply system for Seacroft would be established, and use the design sewage flows of the Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services for Senior Citizen units. Its obvious it isn't going to be a Senior Citizen community. An environmental impact form should be completed. Mr. Crons professional engineer stated in the Feb. 1 hearing how the \ . . Page J . .( Seacrof't property is located near the cenlter..:.of' the highest elevations of' ground water on the North Fork. Its also true that Greenport already owns ground f'or pumping water on Alvah's Lane. With the Brecknock Hall condo project being approved and many more developments pending, this Cutchogue dome of' water could be drawn down quickly. We should concider water supply a very important priority. The developers claim Mr. Villa discussed the requirements relative to a Senior Citizen project, that they have a slightly dif'f'erent water use requirement f'or a Senior Citizen type development. And once again I remind you he's lowering the age requirment so this inf'ormation is all untrue f'or the new project. His f'acts given to the Suf'f'olk County Dept. of' Health Services are the Senior Citizen requirements. Also the sewage trearment system is based on the criteria f'or Senior Citizen housing. We must start thinking about the f'urture and water management program. Nothing was ever mentioned about lighting of' this project. Will the lighting be brilliant and ef'f'ect the surrounding areas? Why didn't this development Seacrof't have to do an Enivornmental statement of' the worst possible projects that could be built there, like the Dalchet zone change had to? There plans didn~ even have half' the impact Seacrof't could do. Seacrof't is a mojor change to the town of' Cutchogue and should not be taken lightly. I urge the Planning Board to require a f'ull and comprehensive environmental review of' the proposed development to help reduce the potential impact. I hope a public meeting will be he~d on this project so the people may add in the design process' to reduce the impact. Sincerely, Nancy Sawastynowicz 7?~~~ . MAY 4 1984 \~,~ /;;;:} Town of Southold Planning Board South old, NY 11971 May lith, 1981i Hargrave Vineyard Nonh Fork Long Island New Yark Cabernet Sauvignon Table Won. P,oduced [,. Botd.d By H.rva~'V,...y..d Cutd'lo8uc, N. Y Dear Members of the Planning Board, I understand that you are considering the site plan for the Seacroft property in Cutchogue. Weare owners of adjacent property. Enclosed please find a copy of the Seacroft agreement regarding open space at the Northerly end of the property, and regarding provisions for creati ng and planting a buffer zone between our two properties. I request that you incorporate this buffer zone into your site plan. I would appreciate the opportunity to meet with the board to discuss this further at your convienence. Sincerely, At,\- 14Mr~ /~, v Alex Hargrave, Pr s. G'J'UL- Long Island Vineyards, Inc. ~ Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue, N. Y. Bonded Winery No. 637 516, 734 ' 5158 ~i'-'ff< (}\'~~~ 11935 . . , ;jIPR 1 7 1984 April 16, 1984 To the Southold Town Planning Board: I am writing with respect to your consideration of the plan for the Seacroft condominiums in Gutchogue. I would like the Planning Board to pay attention to the following: (1) Private roads - Mr. Gron stated to the Tovm Board that the roads in the subdivision would remain forever private and would be paid by homeovmer assessments. I would hope that a covenant be included in any approval of this plan to that effect. (2) Open Space - ~,lr. Gron stated to your Board that some 36 acres of the property would remain as open space (ie - not be developed). How2ver, ho indicated that use of the property would ultimately rest with the yet-to-be formed homeowner's association. I ask you for further assurance by a covenant that the property be Lopt perpetually as open space, and that in the event it is ever developed, that it automatically revert to the Town of Southold. (J) Stores - 'dhen ;::r. Gron addressed the Town Board, he never spo},e of putting the Seacroft property to any other use other than as a retirement community. He spoke of the residents use of existing Gutchogue stores. Now he is proposing to the Tovm Board the creation of new stores on the Seacroft property, presumably owned by him and the other two Seacroft associates. This was never told to tho Town Board. ~oreover, I think that businoss uscs are improper in the ;,;-1 zone. Please omi t the store from the development plan. l.2hD..L'J.k you. T ir::othy Vlaclrer Gutchogue 'b ,,~ 6~" 1<,,-/ -G8'o3 =-"' ) 1\ -:/ J ,.., f.. ~(/'lI<)n ~ , (' . . APR 1 7 1984 .; April 16, 1984 To the Southold Town Planning Board: .l. am concerned about the proposed Seacroft condominium sketch plans . As a concerned Cutchogue resident, I recently reviewed copies of the original documents submitted by the developers to the Town Board when they sought the initial zone change .1-+hiIlK +hue "fe-some serious inconsistencies among those documents, especially in their Znviroillnental Assessment Form (Z.A.P.). T+ a.ppeq r", +0 tto-t the project will , me.. physically alter more than 10 acres in the .Subdivision. On the '7" "7 .<..., t ~:o ,.l. t it was indicated that no impact statement was needed because less t:1an 10 acres were to be developed. Second, St:::'acroft is planning on 2.. v,Tater PUfli:0ing Cal)2~cl tjr of 220 sals/lninute with a total useaLe of J" "uOO ~~ls/p"r"'''' ~, \.:;;)<..-1. 1",,;;_ .......~,j. I~~ t)",C) assessment form, significance is considered if t'1ero is a pumping capacity of greater than 45 cals/min., 20,000 g8,l/day. ,jbviously, thi::; will adver:fr'L:,- affect the ;;;round water and it C' Pf.(''''C;' h l.. a serious discrepancy. Third, the developers indicated that Seacraft would not in- crease the growth of the permanent population of C utchogue b~' more than 5 per cent in a one year period. Dased on 1982 population ectL:Jutes for the Cutchogue - :iew Suf!"oll; co;nmLJ1i ty of 2, OOJ ? eople, 1 t is evident that Seacraft wi t~l its t60 units \'Jill increase the ,;,:o:tJulo.tion by more th~~'l 5,:; 0::..... about l!-i-O l:'Goplc. ~\2ail1, porhaps a. \Llest;c'''Q~\e- or-vL &~~ . ( pg (9) . ( 4/9/84 On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Wall it was ~ . RESOLVED that the S6uthold Town Planning Board qrant an extension of 90 days on the action of the maps of the minor subdivision of Robert and Jean Lenzner located at Mattituck pursuant to the request of the applicants attorney. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, MUllen,Latham, Orlowski, Wall * * * * * * * * * * ON a motion made by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, May 7, 1984 at 7:30 p.m at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road Southold as the time and place for the next reqular meetinq of the Southold TownPlanninq Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, MUllen,Latham, Orlowski, Wall * * * * * * * * * * On a motion made by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board amend the minutes of January 9, 1984 to read as follows: "RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board does not qrant sketch approval of the minor subdivision of Dr. Thomas Samuels at this time, as the Board requests more time to review the proposal. " Vote of the Board:Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Latham, Orlowski, Wall * * * * * * * * * * On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it wa RESOLVED that the Southold Town PlanningBoard amend the minutes of the March 30, 1984 meetinq to read as follows: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board has no obiection to the layout of the proposed subdivision of Blair, locatee at East Marion however, sketch approval cannot be qranted due to the insufficient area of the lots (lOO-31) Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Latham,Orlowski, Wall * * * * * *~.* *.* * '- Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman left the room at this time and the Chair was turned over to Board member Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mr. Raynor waited in the hallway as he cannot participate in the discussion of Seacroft. ********** Mr.Richard Cron, esq. was present for a presubmission conference before the Board to discuss the site plan of Seacroft,located at Cutchogue. Mr. Orlowski briefly explained that the Town Board had recently granted a change of zone for this proposal from A-residential to multiple. . ( pg (10) . ( 4/9/84 Seacroft Cont. Mr. Cron introduced the designers of the project who would be making the presentation before the Board. Present were George Matarazzo of Matarazzo Design, Mr. Carrol, Donald Dennis, architect, and Mr. Bill Reese of Henderson and Bogwell, engineers. Mr. Cron explained again that the Town Board had granted a zone change for this parcel of land making it multiple residence for the purpose of creating an adult- retirement community. Mr. Cron then turned the presentation over the Mr. Mararazzo. Mr. Matarazzo presented to the Board a booklet explaining his background and the work done be his firm. He then explained to the Board the proposed site plan of cluster homes and explained the land use plan. The plan consists of 160 homes that would be attached in a cluster formation of 4-unit bUildings. Those buildings would all have access at grade levels, they would not be high-rise and would be designed in a colonial or traditional look. Mr. Matarazzo presented a sketch map of a proposed shopping area and stated that this would consist of speciality shops, and would be a mini-shopping center on the same scale as the housing. He stated that the shopping center would be another part of the approval process since it is in the commercial zone. However, he presented it at this time as it is in conjunction with the housing plan. He also presented plans illustrating the proposed signs for the community and stated that the community would be called "Seacroft". Mr. Matarazzo again explained that the homes would be a retirement community, for people who have older children ( living away from home. The homes will have attached garages, as well as, two other parking areas on the site for each unit in order to provide ample parking for guests. He mentioned that there will be more than 36 acres of open space out of the total 47 acres. He stated that this area would be landscaped, however, the homeowners could decide in the future if there was to be some other kind of open space use for the acreage other than landscaping) ie. rent the land to vineyards. Mr. Matarazzo said that there would never be any more buildings than the 160 units. He expl~ined that the homes would be sold under a condominium form of ownership, and the homeowner would own the inside of the home, while the area outside the unit would belong to some kind of community association. The homeowner would be obligated to join this association, in order to purchase one of the homes. Mr. Matarazzo indicated that the wells will behind the homes on Highland Road, which would create a buffer between the homes there and the new homes proposed to be built on the site. The low areas of the land are proposed to be ponds which would serve as retaining areas where the ground water would be retained by creating a seal on the ground and any excess water would be percolated into the ground, and the ponds would provide some beauty to the site. He further explained that every unit will have it s own garage, and basement and every unit will have an optional chimney. The units will be from 1200-1500 sq. ft. in size, with 3/4 of the units having one level and the remaining 1/4 c: having two levels. He then presented to the Board a concept by the architect showing the club house, swimming pool and two tennis courts. Mr. Mullen questioned if the acreage left as open land took into consideration the pool, club house, tp,"", i" rnl1rt and road'Navs. Mr. Matarazzo stated that the . ( pg (11) . 4/9;( ( the open space area did inc'lude the pool, clubhouse and tennis courts as hard surface area, however, the road, garage, and all other buildings were not included. Mr. Mullen questioned the access road for emergency vehicles. Mr. Matarazzo said that one access is proposed and the road is to remain in private ownership, however, the developers had considered creating an emergency access to Highland Road with a grass path or graveled path with a break-away gate so access could be made for emergency vehicles but not 'through traffic. Mr. Mullen stated that he would like the developers to give this consideration particularly since this will be a senior community. Mr. Latham questioned the ponds and Mr. Matarazzo stated that the ponds will have two uses, 1) for aesthetics and 2) for run-off retention. Mr. Mullen questioned the age limit for the people who would be living in the homes. Mr. Matarazzo stated that the minimum age would be 45-50 with no children 19 years of age. Mr. Cron added that at first they had set the age as 55, however,they decided to set the age lower for people who wanted to retire earlier and while there was no hard and fast rule as to minimum age, it will still be an adult community, since there will be no children under the age of 19 years. With regard to the living space, Mr. Matarazzo stated that the 1200-1500 inc~uded the second story, but excluded the garage. Mr. Orlowski questioned if the plan would have its own water and sewage. Mr. Resse, engineer for the project stated that the sanitary will be basically ceptic systems and a number of buildings will be teid into one system. He noted that th<, l,'uffolk County Department of Hea 1 i:<l is receptive to this idea, however, theymust prove to them that an adult community uses less water and sewage. He further explained to the Board that the 2" well drilled indicated that the water quality is good. Mr. Orlowski asked if there was any traffic report. Mr. Cron stated that this report was submitted to the Town Board for the change of zone. Mr. Orlowski indicate that there was none in the Planning Board file and Mr. Cron indicated that he would be glad to supply the Board with a copy. Mr. Orlowski thanked the group for making the presentation and stated that any comments by the Board or requests will be made to the&torney for the applicant and will be done in writing. ( * * * * * * * * * * Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr. returned to the room at this time to chair the remainder of the meeting. * * * * * * * * * * On a motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was ( '- RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site plan of Joseph Shipman located at Laurel for the construction of a tree-service business subject to a one-year review. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Orlowski, Latham, W~ * * * * * * * * * * . (I MAY 4 1984 Messrs. Richard J. Cron, William Carroll, and Joseph Nolan "Seacroft Developers" c/O Mr. Richard Cron Main Road Cutchogue NY 11935 March 9, 1983 Hargrave Vineyard North Fork Long Island New Yark Cabernet Sauvignon T.~ W"",l'rod....:ed j,.8oIo1ed By H...........-Vorwyvd c...:t.op.:. NY Dear Sirs, I would like to confirm your representation to me regarding your proposed rezoning plan on the "Leisure Green" property in Cutchogue during our meeting on Sunday January 23rd, 1983 at the office of Mr. Cron. You jointly and severally agree to covenant that the northerly 1.3647 acres (consisting of a piece bordering on 251.03'of our property, thence East 145.28' along property owned by Beebe, together equalling 396.31' and extending 150' to the South into the "Leisure Green"- "Seacroft" property) which abut the Long Island Vineyards, Inc. property will remain free of buildings or structures of any kind. Furthermore, you agree and grant that Long Island Vineyards, Inc. has the right to make plantings of trees on this covenanted property and to tend and maintain them without restriction or removal. This convenant is binding on you, your heirs, your successors and assigns, as well as on all parties to which you may subsequently transfer any oir all of your rights in this property as contract vendees. You agree to so apprise them. You represent that there is no legal restriction in deed or mortgage or otherwise to prevent you from agreeing to this convenant. Please confirm the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter. Sincerely, A~:!:f:!::t~ ~- ~~/~-~~ i liam Carrol~-above I, William Carroll, represent that I have the power to agree to this covenant, that my partners and I are aware of its terms and agree to them. I understand that Long Island Vineyards, Inc. relies on this representation and covenant to protect its property and its value. ~~~~ illiam Car II ~- s.....,om -I.:, 'o<&xe m.e %I\S ~ cht cfr fY'ocd\. \9<03. ~~~ CWl J. COMa NOrARr ~"'fI" felt Alvah's Lane, Cutch~~ 637 516 - 734 - 5158 Long Island Vineyards, Inc. ... C'iP5lV\ .9\<+\ '6tl Bonded Winery No. ~ \ .. . . PUBLIC HEARING SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD tFEBRUARY 1, 1983 8:00 P.M. IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF RICHARD J. CRON FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM "A" RESIDENTIAL AND AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "M" LIGHT MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT ON CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SCHOOL HOUSE ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK. Present: Supervisor William R. Pell, III Councilman John J. Nickles Councilman Lawrence Murdock, Jr. Councilman Francis J. Murphy Councilman Joseph L. Townsend Justice Raymond W. Edwards * * * Town Clerk Judith T. Terry Town Attorney Robert W. Tasker SUPERVISOR PELL: The hearing on the petition of Richard J. Cron for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Light Multiple Residence District will be read by Councilman Townsend. COUNCILMAN TOWNSEND: "Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, a public hearing will be held by the Town Board of the Town of Southold at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, at 8:00 o'clock P.M. on the 1st day of February, 1983 on the proposal of Richard J. Cron to amend the Building Zone Ordinance, (including the Building Zone Maps) of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, by chaneing from "A" Residcntial and Ae;ricul tUl-al District to "M" Light Multiple Residence District all that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is located the following four courses and distances from the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly line of Main Road and the westerly line of Griffing Street: (1) North 400 23' 10" West 73.50 feet; (2) North 420 29' 30" West 218.70 feet; (3) North 42 09' 00" West 140.27 feet; (4) North 380 32' 40" West 642.92 feet; running thence from said point of beginning along other land of Leisure Greens, Inc. South 520 55' 20" West 162.41 feet to the land of The Reman Catholic Church of the Sacred Heart at Cutchogue; running thence along said last mentioned land the fOllowing two courses and distances: (1) North 370 13' 30" West 400.00 feet; (2) South 530 05' 40" West 407.11 feet to land now or formerly of Greiner and PelkovskYi running thence along said last mentioned land North 360 54' 20" West 2009.51 feet to land now or formerly of Zuhoskii . . .,'--~... "._~~,,~,,- .... 1 J?age 2 - Public Hearii - Richard J. Cron Change. ,Zone running thence along said last mentioned land North 500 18' 10" East 251.03 feet to land now or formerly of Beebe; running thence along said last mentioned land the following three courses and distances: (1) North 560 00' 50" East 145.28 feet; (2) South 370 13' 30" East 221. 47 feet; (3) North 390 29' 10" East 563.41 feet to land now or formerly of Kurczewski; running thence along said last mentioned land South 380 30' 50" East 1901.44 feet to land now or formerly of Tyler; running thence along said last mentioned land the follow- ing two courses and distances: (1) South 370 38' 50" West 210.23 feet; (2) South 370 04' 40" East 273.68 feet to land now or formerly of the Town of Southold; running thence along' said last mentioned land the following two courses and'distances: (1) South 520 55' 20" West 170.00 feet; (2) South 370 04' 40" East 95.00 feet to the northerly side of School House Road; running thence along the north- erly side of School House Road South 520 55' 20" West 55.10 feet to the point of place of beginning. Any person desiring to be heard on the above proposed amendment should appear at the time and place above so specified. Dated: December 21, 1982. By Order of the Southold Town Board, Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk." I've got affidavits from the Editor of the Long Island Traveler- Watchman Patricia Wood, and from the Publisher of the Suffolk Times Troy Gustavson that the notice was printed in their paper. There are a couple of communications attached to the file. One from Bertha Kurczewski opposed to the rezoning. She is the owner of land adjacent to it. I have a letter from Walter R. Kaelin, who is the Secretary of the Cutchogue-New Suffolk Chamber of Commerce in favor of the proposal. There is a letter from John Berryman of the Greenport-Southold Chamber of Commerce in favor of the proposal. ~here is a letter from Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman of the Planning Board recommending denial of the proposed change of zone of Richard J. Cron and they ul1derlined that "This recommendation was made in view of the fact that the Planning Board presented in the master plan the conception that there be no multiple residences between Mattituck and Southold and this was supported by 85% of the people." There is a letter from Lee E. Koppelman, Director of the Suffolk County Department of Planning stating that, "Pursuant to Sections 132~ and 1332 of the Suffulk Cuunty Charter, the ab~ve referenced application (Richard J. Cron) is not within the jurisdiction of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. II , There is an affidavit by the Town Clerk Judith Terry that the Notice of Hearing was placed on the Town Clerk's Bulletin Board at Town Ha 11 . SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you. You have heard the reading of the public notice. At this time Town Board will listen to Counsel Cron. RICHARD J. CRON, ATTORNEY, Cutchogue, New York: If it pleases the Board, I'm here this evening on an application to effect a change of zone on a parcel situate just off Griffing Street in the hamlet of Cutchogue, from an "A" Residential area to an "M" Light Multiple Residence District. Before I proceed with the actual formal presentation, in the light of the fact that my name solely appears on the application, I think I would like to intrOduce to the Board and those present, the associates who are in this project with me. .. " Page 3 - Public Hewng - Richard J. Cron Cha. of Zone In this regard I'd like to introduce Mr. Joseph Nolan, who is a resident of New Suffolk, and also a business proprietor running the Nolan's Village Store in Cutchogue. I also have, this evening, present with us, Mr. Bill Carroll. Bill, of course, is also a Cutchogue resident and is associ&ed as an account executive with the Merrill-Lynch organization in Riverhead. Myself, together with Mr. Nolan and Mr. Carroll,constitute the only people who are directly and indirectly or any other way interested in this project. As you can readily see, we're all local people, we're all vitally interested in the area of Cutchogue and the Town of Southold. I think it's also important that you be introduced to some of the people who will also speak this evening. I have with me Mr. Roy Haje--not necessarily in the order in which they will say something, but in the order in which I will introduce them to you now. I have Mr. Roy Haje, who I'm sure the Board is most familiar with, having been a permit administrator with the Department of Environmental Conservation for some time, and now with his own organization handling environmental matters. Mr. Roy Haje. We also have with us Mr. Joe Raynor, who probably also is well known to this Board, who is engaged in general engineering, water and sewage considerations. He too will speak this evening. Joe. I also have with us Mr. Donald Denis, who is the architect who will be designing this project, not only from the site locations, but as well as the specific units that are proposed within the site. Denis. And we also have with us a person who has done the traffic analysis with respect to the area in question, Mr. William McGrath of the firm of DMJM. Now, with those introductions made, I think it's important that we go into some historical background on this application. The Board, or some of the members at least of this Board, will undoubtedly recall that back in 1974 an application was made with respect to this same parcel for a change of zone from "A" Residential-Agricultural to Multiple Residence. What was proposed at that time was also a senior citizen type of retirement community, so in a that the application at that time sought a change of zone, it is similar to the application that is being made here this evening. However, the similarity ends there, because the applications are quite dissimilar~ The application that was made back in 1974 requested some 296 units. Our examination of the application found that this was not and would not be in the best interest of Cutchogue and the Town of Southold. So when we examined this thing, with our experts, our main concern was to create something that would be aesthetically pleasing and at the same time economically feasible in terms of providing a great number of amenities. And the plan resolved itself into 160 units, which is what is proposed in this application. We believe that a 160 unit proposal will be economically feasible, will fit within the plans of the Town of Southold, and is located in such an area that it will be attractive to those who might be interested. Now, at the time the first applica- tion was made to the Town Board, the Planning Board, of course, reviewed the application. And in their review they came up with the very same language in recommending a disapproval, as appears in the recommenda- tion of this Board (and when I say this Board I'm speaking of the Planning Board) to the Town Board. And, of course, the recommendation was as Mr. Townsend read it. This recommendation was made in view of the fact that the Planning Board presented in our Master Plan the conception that there be no multiple residences between Mattituck and Southold, and this was supported by 85% of the people. N~w, fro~ a historical p"oint of vie'," I thir.1c j~'s import" ~,.., r:c'.e ,.r, t' t}O ~ t l"'''''' ,-.. ~ __ ,'> ...,,.. . .-.-.-.--- .-,.-.-.-. . .?nge 4 - Public Hear.., - Richard J. Cron Changtlrf Zone extent is misleading. The 85% of the people that that recommenda- tion refers to was 85% of people at an information hearing in October of 1970. At that hearing there was 140 people present and if my recollection serves me correctly I was probably there myself. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Chairman of the Planning Board asked that group how many were in favor of the Master Plan. Out of that group 110 said they were in favor. So when this refers to 85% of the people approve this particular concept, that is totally incorrect, because 85% of the people of the Town of Southold did not do that in fact. Finally, and furthermore, the concept that no condominiums be placed between Mattituck and Southold was not discussed at that informational hearing. Tbe area in question was probably set forth in the proposed Master Plan map. That map was never adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold. I'm sure the Board recalls that back in 1970, when the Master Plan was discussed and proposed by the PI~nning Board, that at that time it was intended to be a ten year plan to begin with. So that legitimately in validity, it would have expired ten years from the date of 1970 and the entire proposed Master Plan would then be reviewed by the Town as is now intended and is taking place, so that many of the thoughts and recommendations at that time would not necessarily have application 12-13 years down the line as we now stand here today. But even more important, the decision of the Planning Board back in 1974, where it recommended disapproval to the Town Board of that zone change, was based on data that was not correct, it was based upon a vote that allegedly took place dealing with the very thought as to whether a condominium project should exist between Mattituck and Southold. If you read through the informational hearing in 1970, no discussion ever took place on that point. As I say, where this was contained was in the map itself. And frankly, for what reason I do not understand, why the Planning Board would ever reach a conclusion that in the area of Cutchogue a condominium project is not feasible or acceptable, because within the scope of the development plan as it was presented by the Planning Board to the Town Board, specific reference was made to those areas in which it would be appropriate to have apartment or clustered or attached- type of housing. And you know what that report said of the Planning Board in 1970--and I will also say what it said again in 1978 in a similnr Gcvelopmeilt plan for the Town of Southold--ior the same language was used in its entirety in both situations? That Board said that the most suitable place for condominiums and attached housing, whether it be for senior citizens or otherwise, was adjacent to business areas, and I can think of no better location than the location that's proposed to this Board, as to where a proposal of this nature should be located, because not only is this adjacent to the entire business area of the hamlet of Cutchogue, it is in fact contiguous to it. So I can think of no better place. Now, I've looked at some of the other recommendations of the Planning Doard as to where condominiums, not necessarily of this nature, but condominiums in general should be located, and frankly I haven't found one yet that meets the criteria of that Board and the previous Board as to where condominiums should be located. So, I think from that historical point of view it's important that the Board under- stands the recommendation of the Planning Board as baSically being a nullity. It's not predicated on that data on which that Board made a decision. Not only that, you could argue that it's totally obsolete. It's predicated on a "decision" that was made in 1974 l-"~bt: . :;; - Public r'.'U'b - l... ".,.1:, J. C1"On LnW" u1 Zone recommending disapproval of an application that was totally dissimilar to the application that's being made here by virtue of the density of the project. True, it's similar in that the zone change in both instances are the same. So, I would ask the Board in reviewing the recommendation of the Planning Board that it realize that it's made on something that is totally obsolete, made on something that is totally misleading, and made on facts that are totally incorrect. So, if that kind of a recommendation can have an validity, well then I don't know what a valid recommenda- tion might be. I would like to hand up to the Board an excerpt from the Development Plan of the Town of Southold contained in a resolution to approve and submit to the Town Board, dated September 14, 1978, made by the Planning Board, page 4 thereof, which states, and I've put it in red brackets, "A final information meeting was held on October 2, 1970, at which time 85% of those attending expressed approval of the presentation." 'I think the Board "can see that that statement is likewise dissimilar from the statement that was contained in the recommendations of the Planning Board under two instances to which I referred. I'd like to submit this. (Exhibit I). I don't wish to read this in its entirety, because I'm going to submit it to the Board, but I think it's important for those present that they hear some of this and I'd like to quote from, again, the Development Plan of the Town of Southold, of a resolution to accept, approve and submit to the Town Board. One of these is dated back in October 2nd, 1970, and the other is September 14th, 1978, both however, contain identical langauge and I quote, "Garden Apartment and Attached House Development. The Plan recommends consideration of medium density residential uses on various sites, sometimes in the future, when the need and demand for multi-family units develops. Such uses would be strictly controlled by zoning regulations. SpeCifically, areas which might be considered potentially suitable for multi-family development are those in the immediate vicinity of retail shopping, service and general commercial areas. Zoning standards would assure...." And they go on to say, "In evaluating the desirability of this type of land use, a number of studies relating to multi-family development in other communities were analyzed. These studies were concerned with the effects of such development on existing community character and municipal services, the number of school age children such a development might bring, the tax revenue produced by this use as compared with other land uses, the type of income levels of the probably residents of such units and the benefits to be derived by the local shopping establish- ments. Services can be provided for apartment "developments with conSiderably greater efficiency and economy than for single-family houses. Multi-family developments can add a significant amount of tax revenue to the community base, and usually house relatively few school age children. In addition, their occupants contribute substantial consumer buying power to the local retail areas. For these reasons, apartments usually require less in municipal services than the taxes they pay." (Exhibits II and I I 1) I would submit that all of the criteria set forth in those recommendations of the Planning Board to the Town Board back in 1970 and again in 1978 meet all of the criteria of the Seacroft Community that's proposed here this evening. Now, with that, I think if I could go into some aspects of of this proposal. As you can see, the program is entitled there, --._~'~'-~'.'__~_...~~-""'''''''-''''''C-. .... Page 6 - Public Hearing - . Richard J. Cron ChWe of Zone "Proposed Plan of Adult Retirement Community". It's broken down into some categories. I'll try to be rather brief because I think to some extent they're self-explanatory. Of course the land in question the Board is undoubtedly familiar with. Right now it's zoned "A" Residential and Agricultural. It consists of pretty much flat land of an acreage of 46.16 acres. The land has, in the past, been used for some farming and may until somethint developes either on this proposal or something else, be used still for that purpose. As I indicated to you, the land is immediately adjacent and contiguous to the business area in Cutchogue. It lies immediately behind the business area and north thereof to approximately--well, I don't know the exact footage, but it runs to the land of Hargraves where there's currently a vineyard in progress. The surrounding area I have, to some extent, given to you with the exhibits that were just admitted as II and III. I think all of you are familiar with the Cutchogue area. You certainly do know that we have a number of stores in Cutchogue. We have Mr. Nolan's business, which is a boon to the area. We have the post office in the immediate Vicinity, we have in this area a drug store, we, of course, have the North Fork Bank in close proximity, we have our churches in close proximity and for those who feel the need of some exercise, w~ll, I guess we've got a par-3 golf course as well. Certainly it's within walking distance of all of these things which I think become important when you consider an adult retirement community, particularly where most of the in- habitants will be of senior citizen age. I think it's important that there be transportation available and we certainly have that in Cutchogue. There's transportation that can take people to and from Greenport, to and from Riverhead, and I imagine hook up at that point in Riverhead and go further west if that's desired. So I think when you're dealing with a project of this nature that it becomes important to have all these things available and this project certainly does. As far as the nature of the project itself, well, the purpose of the project is obviously to provide some adult residential units and when I say adult residential units I'm speaking of those people who will utilize them being at least 55 years of age, at least as to one of the inhabitants, and not having any children of an age of less than 19 years on a permanent basis. The units themselves will be inhabi tce Gtrictly as a loc.tireinent or an adult community. The number of units that are proposed would be four units per building, and obviously, of course, the buildings themselves would fall within the requirements of the zoning ordinance. In this instance they cannot be greater in length than 125 feet, if I'm correct. So if you take the number of bUildings proposed, which are 40, you would come out with the 160 units that are proposed in this project. The units themselves at first blush as we're dealing with this now, we contemplate having units run in a square footage area,at least at this time, anywhere from 1100 square feet to approximately 2200 square feet. The latter, if you can see, being represented by the two story structure that's contained in a typical bUilding. As you can see, it's the desire and the absolute intent to create this of a colonial design. While the facades and the colors may be different with respect to each bUilding, we could call that a typical building and a typical elevation. In terms of the amenities that we would hope to provide--and the reason we are in the area of 160 units is obviously if you are going to provide a number of amenities you've got to reduce the cost of those on a per unit . 1.~'O - ";_0-' '-,------''''''''- . . ~'~ge 7 - Public He,,_ -. - Richard J. Cron Change.f Zone basis. If you get too few units you obviously have to give up some of the amenities because the cost is prohibitive. What we propose to do is provide, in terms of a security system, a 24 hour security system within the project. We would expect that there would be a club house for the use of the residents. We would expect that there would be a swimming pool, tennis courts and perhaps a putting ereen. Needless to say, if you start cutting the units to low you can't provide all these things, and in terms of an adult community, we think all of these things are important. As far as the construction data itself, well I can only tell you that we're committed to using the best of materials and the best of labor and "making this a most highly qualified quality type of project. The last catetory there is land for the Cutchogue Library. Let me tell you what this is all about. I suppose when the project became known in the area, we were approached by the people from the Cutchogue Library and ~sked if we could consider laying aside some of the land in this area for the Cutchogue Library. Apparently they feel that, I suppose, if you start anew with sufficient land more could be accomplished now and in the future than dealing with that which they already have. We are amenable to such a request. If we can help them and the community itself we would give serious consideration to their request. In looking at this project we have made an effort to try to set forth what we consider the advantages to the project and what might constitute an alternative use for the site in question. The Board, I'm sure, is quite familiar with category A as it has come up for discussion in the past and undoubtedly will continue to come up for discussion. We think that this is a better alternative to creation of two family housing in the Town of Southold. I'll tell you why I say this. With this specific project you're going to know what you have today, you're going to know what you have tomorrow, and you're going to know what you have 20 years from now, because what will be created will be the same. There is no room for change. There is no room for doing something else. This matter has to go through the Attorney General, and in terms of the amenities within the project, in terms of the roads within the project, all of these will belong to the resident property owners. They will govern this project. They will maintain the roads, they will maintain the landscaping~ they will maintuin the exterior of the buildings through a property owner's association, which is commonly the way condominiums are handled. So we do feel that a project of this nature is a better alternative than to two family housing, because with the latter you don't know what you always get or what you will get. In terms of B, I think it's clear that since this entire project will be specifically designed for a senior group of people, that it certainly will fit and fulfill a senior housing need. We believe that such a need does exist in the Town of Southold. We believe that there are many seniors within the Town who would prefer this type of housing than to that which they already have. We have been approached by many of the senior citizens in the Town who presently are housed in large single family dwellings who find that method of living at this date, at this time in their lives not satisfactory, so we think that this, with all of the amenities that can be provided in this type or project, more suitable to their needs. Again, I've already pointed this out in terms of the density of the project, that there are so many units that you've got to have in order to provide those type of amenities that are listed there. I think probably the most important thing ..- -- ._~.~ -..----.-""-..-,.. . ...., ".,"'...,......-:-:-,-_...- '-'---., ,.-" '. - Page 8 - Public Hea~g - Richard J. Cron Chan~of Zone as far as the Board is concerned is that this is a self-maintained community project. The Town will have to provide no services in of itself for this community. Oh sure, there will be local fire protection that will be provided, but in terms of road maintenance or any of the other things that the Town is required to do with respect to public type of projects, won't be required here, because money will be collected on a monthly basis as a maintenance charge to provide all of those things that are set forth as the amenities. Obviously there ought to be no imposition on the local schools because there will be no children within that community of school age as far as the local schools are concerned, because the only permanent resident on a child basis will have to be someone that is at least 19 years of age. So there certainly is not going to be any imposition on the schools. As far as substantial tax dollars, well, I think that's obvious. I'm not going tc sell that point, but I think the point itself is obvious. I think you're talking probably in the area of probably 15 million dollars of fair market value with no great imposition on Town services and the local schools, so I think the generation of tax dollars is certainly in that type of community. Again, the group that you will attract into this specific project is a very attractive group of consumers. It's your adult residents, sen.ior citizens, most of whom I would think would probably deal locally with the local business establishments. Again, I don't think I can stress any more how ideal the location is. It is immediately adjacent to the business areas, and if one looks at these and one looks at the exhibits that I have submitted to the Board and all fill the same criteria of the Planning Board and their Development Plan of the Town of Southold as I indicated in October of 1970 and September of 1978. Finally, I think you have to look at which might be the alternative if this project doesn't pass. What do you do with this property? Well, you can retain it in agri- culture, but you know, Cornell and all the studies, and frankly even the Planning Board in its own review of the Plan of Development for the Town of Southold, clearly recognizes that agriculture, unfortunately, will be on the decline. Certainly in terms of potato farming certainly will be. So it's highly unlikely that this specific piece of land is going to remain in agricUlture. The only other alternative that you have, obviously to that, if this doesn't go, is single family residential development and,frankly, my view of the site and the view of others that I have consulted with who are even more knowledgable in that area than I am, feel that this would probably go in a low-cost type of housing if it goes into single family dwellings. I don't think the parcel is conducive to 150 thousand dollar, 200 thousand dollar houses. I don't think it would develop in that way. With that you may end up with a density problem greater and less attractive, certainly, than what we propose. You know, when one looks at the density of the project in terms of buildings itself, there isn't any difference. I would say on the parcel as it exists you could put 40 single family residential dwellings. That's all we propose to put there, 40 mUltiple residence bUildings. Certainly the buildings aren't going to look unattractive. I see nothing wrong with having a bUilding 125 feet in length if it's attractive. Certainly 125 foot single family ranch house would look attractive, so I see no rea~on why this would not also look attractive. In terms of denSity of people, I can't tell you how many would occupy the site, but I don't think it would be any more than two per unit and on the basis of the people who have contacted us, I would say it would be substantially less than that because many of them are widows and ".. P,~g;e 9 - . Public Eeaing - hlchala J. Cron Chaw of Zone widowers, so in the single family dwelling aspect there could be any number of persons per unit, and I think you have to look in addition to the density of people, if that's what the concern is, and look at the quality of the density. I don't think I have any more to say on that. With that, I think I'd like to introduce at this time, Mr. Denis, the architect for the group and ask him to speak briefly to you. MR. DONALD A. DENIS, Architect: The principals here,who were introduced before, came to my office and I was retained to do the preliminary work for the project. That's about nine months ago. I walked the project, walked the property. If you are probably familier with the property, it enlarges slightly as it goes to the north. There's a low area to the right of the east as you proceed on to the property. Generally the land is fairly level, and it's all open, not wooded at all and there is housing to the west of the development area. The intent, and I'll speak very generally about this, it's a concept. The units are. 40, in four to a building, 160 living units. The comment someone made to me was that gee that's an alwful lot of roads. It could have been a little simpler, but one of the things is that we were trying to eliminate the possibility of having a lot of cars along the streets. One of the thoughts was that we would have the dwelling units, each would have probably one car, being only two persons to a unit or one, that there would in all probability only be one car and that we would provide a one-car garage. Instead of putting that in front of the building and having a driveway with a lot of cars parked out in front of a garage, with garages like they usually are, or along the main road, we would have the garages to the rear. So each of the structures has individual private garages in the back which we think is essential and we would require the cars to go around the back and wouldn't visible if you came on to the property. That was an initial concept. The other thing is the units vary in size and try to have an economic group, a range of higher desirability of one price range to another. They're all two-bedroom units so in order to get variety into the architecture, we went into some two-bedroom uni.ts which would give us a break to the rocf lines. The other idea was not to have any of these things line up, to make them irregular in position on the site so that they would these space inbetween the buildings and it was also considered that the property would be very highly landscaped. I think we're talking about a budget probably of three or four hundred thousand dollars of landscaping alone, which if could be taken on a per house basis is not exorbitant but when you multiply it out by the number of units it does give us a lot of landscaping. So the property would be pretty well developed as far as the landscaping. The outside of the property would be all maintained as a common element. fhese units I think are just a conceptual type of thing, what we will be starting. The principals a~ree that this is what they would like ,to do. I would say that the intent of the design is to come up with three basic units which we intended to put in a variety of relationships to each other, always four to a building, but then we would also vary the materials on the outside of the building so the units didn't look alike. You may have this building repeated, but it may be flipped over, instead of brick it may be clapboarjs, Page 10 Public"'aring - Richard J. Cron ~nge of Zone it would be shingles, the roof material will be different, the colors would be different and there's an infinite number of combinations just by variety of the arrangement of the units. We have a density here of 3.4 units per acre. The units vary from 1200 to 2200 square feet. 9lgaill, this is still conceptual. I think it depends on what the market is. All the units have a private garage and also a private patio to the rear with private sitting area. We intend that there may be options here offered to the prospective buyers, such as fire- places, full basements for perhaps workshops. The community center we are thinking of having areas in there where people could meet, card rooms, craft rooms, a sm~ll meeting room-for movies or shows. We're going to have two tennis courts, swimming pool, a putting range. I would just sort of summarize by saying that with the principals,from the very initial conversations with me, have talked quality. It was their intent, since they are members of the community, to build only something of the highest quality. They would say, we would rather err on the high side than the low side. So that's the instructions I've been given and I hope they can continue with the project. Thank you. MR. CRON: Thank you very much, Donald. My next three parties I'm going to ask the Board, if you feel it essential that they be sworn as witness before you, or if you desire them to be sworn as witnesses. The next party that I call will be Mr. McGrath who is a traffic analyst. Do you feel that you want the witness sworn in at all? SUPERVISOR PELL: Board with agreed No. Any other Board members? with Supervisor Pell,) I don't. (The MR. CRON: Then I will ask Mr. McGrath to step up here and I would ask you, Mr. McGrath, before you start to state your qualifications to the Board. MR. WILLIAM McGRATH: Thank you Mr. Cron, Mr. Chairman and members of the Board. My name is William McGrath. I live in Yorktown in Westchester County, New York. I'm a professional traffic and transportation engineer. I have been doing this work for a little over thirty years. I was th~ director of traffic ahd parking in the City of New Haven, Connecticut and I was the traffi~ commissioner of the City of Boston and for the past ten years I've been offering private engineering services with respect to developments and such like traffic and transportation. At Mr. Cron's request we examined this proposed development area and the traffic situation in the neighborhood and as you've been told they propose to construct some 160 dwelling units for an adult retirement community. The one entrance to the site, which is at School House Road and Griffing, which is about 1200 feet north of Main Road and as has been described, Griffing, down near Main Road, has the post office and is widened with a center strip and north of there it is a rather typical rural road without active frontage at the moment. School House Road goes east to Depot and at that point traffic using School Rouse can go-- turn left and go north to North Road. In our study we obtained some traffic volume information from the New York State Department of Transportation and found that the average daily traffic on Main Road is some 7000 a day in 24 hours and that comes to about 600 something per hour in the average evening peak hour of the average . '. Page 11 - Public H.ing - Richard J. Cron Ch'-e of Zone day, average business day. We examined the Possible trip generation of this proposed development. We observed that the trip generation of an adult retirement community is lower than that of single family dwellings. We used the standard PUblication provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers as our guide, and we determined that it could be expected that this development would generate some 56 vehicles entering in the evening, evening peak hour, and 24 exiting from the site, for a total of 80. The morning peak hour would be somewhat lower and we didn't further examine the morning peak hour because the morning peak hour flow on the road, on Main Road, is lower, so the evening would be the highest activity point. This 80 vehicles in an hour coming or going from the site is, in our opinion, not excessive. We didn't examine the traffic handling capacity of the intersection of Griffing and the Main Road, and having assigned and distributed the traffic we car.ried out standard highway capacity calculations. We found that now the road operates at level of service "B", as we call it, which is free flowing, and this added traffic would not change that level of service from that category, so it would not be worsened to any extent. It would be-- obviously it would be additional traffic, but it would not be a worsened condition, still be level of service "B", which is generally quite acceptable to drivers and to the community. Based on all that, we believe that this development could be permitted without any undue traffic impact on the area in question. Thank you. MR. CRON: Thank you, Mr. McGrath. I should like at this time to hand up to the Board reduced Copies of what you see there (on the easel display). A reduced copy of the site plan and a reduced copy of the typical elevation, typical bUilding layout (Exhihit IV). In addition, I would also like to submit to the Board the Traffic Analysis just recently commented on by Mr. McGrath (Exhibit V). I would like now at this time to ask Mr. John Raynor to come up and state his qualifications and give you a brief report. MR. JOHN J. RAYNOR: I'm a professional engineer and land surveyor also and I have been asked to supply for the applicants advice and engineering services relative to water supply and sewage disposal and on-site engineering and development of the. plans. I ha,ve very \ little to tell you because the development of water supply and sewage disposal plans is really related to the next stage of our planning. I can tell you a little bit about the reasons why I believe that we will be able to provide the required systems. The first consider- ation is the fact that the property is located near the center of the highest elevations of ground water on the North Fork and that generally corresponds to the greater depth of fresh water available for water supply. The property also is at sufficient elevation that we would be able to'~evelop on-site sewage disposal systems without interfering with the groundwater or bringing the bottoms of our leaching pools too close to the groundwater. So in that sense we should be able to meet all of the Suffolk County Health Department's requirements. I did have a preliminary meeting with Mr. Villa last summer to discuss their requirements relative to this type of project, and Mr. Villa's initial reaction was that we would be able to meet their requirements and he did point out that they have a Slightly different water use requirement for senior citizen type developrrent, and he 2.]~'" ~ointed out that wp W",,1" he "~~'Jirer! ~o .,. .' -, .._.._.,~..--~~- 'v '.__.____.._~_.... ._._~._.__ .----.........-.-.-- "---. --....---...------ - . -Page 12 - Public Heatlrg - Richard J. Cron Cha~ of Zone community water supply system, which we are prepared to do. One of the things that he asked us to do, and apparently is a policy of the Department of Health Services now, is to consider the dedication of a community water supply system to the Suffolk County Water Authority so that those systems would be constructed in accordance with the Suffolk County Water Authority's require- ments and would be turned over to them for operation if they find that it is a large enough system to be feasibily run by them. If in fact we are able to meet the senior citizen requirements for the Department of Health Services, and to provide a community water. supply system, the equivalent flow analysis for senior citizen use on the property would be within the normal density requirements of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. That's essentially all that I can say at this time. We do expect that we will do fairly exten~ive testing on the site if the project continues and that we will work with the Suffolk County Water Authority, the Department of Health Services and with the Town to develop a system of water supply and sewage disposal which meets the capability of the site. Thank you. MR. CRON: If it pleases the Board, I would like to submit just a letter report of Mr. Raynor which basically discusses the things that ,he said (Exhibit VI). And finally now I would like to call Mr. Roy Haje to give an environmental assessment as to the site itself. I would ask Roy to set forth his qualifications to the Board. MR. ROY L. ~AJE: I wasformerly employed by the State Department of Environmental Conservation as the Alternate Permit Agent. I was employed by that agency for eleven years and began my own business, Enconsultants, three years ago--three years ago today as a matter of fact, and the firm is involved in permit acquisition, environmental assessments, enironmental impact statements and so forth. I have a brief statement, if I could read it to you. In reviewing the environmental impact of a project, it is necessary to consider the various elements which may be impacted. Depending upon the type of project and location, some of these elements are of lesser importance while others must be looked at more carefully. The instant applica- tion concerns the placement of 160 dwelling units, community center, various recreational facilities, roads, etc. The subject parcel consists of 46+ acres extending northward of the northerly end of Griffing Street, Cutchogue, Town of Southold. The land consists of farm fields which are flat to gently rolling in contour. Of greatest interest in this project ,will be the effect of the proposed work upon the groundwater resources and upon the soils themselves. As conventional heating will be employed in the units, there is not expected to be any appreciable effect upon air quality. The effect upon groundwater resources is being reviewed by others and was dis- cussed previously. Therefore, the only remaining environmental significant area to be expored is the effect upon soils and topography. The Suffolk County Soil Survey 'describes several related soil types within the subject parcel. These are Riverhead sandy loams, Plymouth loamy sands and Haven loams. These soils are often found associated with each other as is the case here. The hazard of erosion is moderate to slight and with proper contourin~ and landscaping should present no problem. All of the soils mentioned are well suited to farming the crops commonly grown in Suffolk County. The removal of the soils from production must be weighed against the need for the i--aGe .- ~3'- PUbllC Hea.~l]g . Richard J. _.vn Change of Zone . " development and the environmental assessment. It is not anticipated that the project will adversely effect surrounding agricultural or residential uses but will co-exist with them. Considering the prominence of the Town of Southold as a retirement community, this project will not create a new sociological impact. It is anticipated that existing facilities in and around the Cutchogue viCinity will be adequate to supply the new community. Thank you. . MR. CRON: Thank you, Roy. I should like to hand up a copy of Mr. Haje's report (Exhibit VII). If it pleases the Board at this time, that basically concludes the presentation for. this project. With the Board's consent, however, .1 should like to reserve a comment at the conclusion if I may make that. Thank you. SUPERVISOR PELL: Anybody else present wish to speak in favor of this application for a zone change from agriculture to."M"? Please use the microphone and state your name please. MR. ROBERT GOODALE, Main Road, Mattituck: I've been a North Fork resident for about ten years. I've known one of the principals of the development, Joe Nolan, since I've moved here and I would attest to his character. I am in favor of the project. I'm in the service industry and I go along to a lot of widow and widowers houses where they're obsessed with the maintenance of the older houses and they wish that they could get into some sort of a project like this. Thank you. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you, Mr. Goodale. The gentleman in the red coat, 'y-es, sir? MR. JOE GIBBONS: I'm a relatively recent new-comer to the Mattituck area. I grew up most of my life in Port Washington, Nassau County and when I first came to the Riverhead area and was concerned and interviewed for jobs, ~ne of the primary reasons for making my final decision to live in this area was a life style which it afforded and the beauty of the land. Port Washington, as most of you may know, is quite populated and as a youth I saw the development of a Levittown right next to my old community. So when I, through the friendships that I developed thrbugh Mr. Cron and Mr. Carroll, learned of a development of this nature, I was most anxious to learn 'what they were going to do aesthetically. I was delighted to learn that they were going to offer a very high quality development and I think this is something which th. area could use, not only in the financial sense, but I think it's mutually comptatable with the purpose which is going to be offered, and that is to offer a very safe community for the elderly. So in addition to the expert testimony, r certainly welcome the opportunity to endorse this project and having seen what has gone on on the South Fork also on Dune Road and also on Sound Road and the number of bungalows we have, r would certainly think that this type of development would be most condusive to the area and r think, from my point of view, would be most welcome. Thank you. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you, Mr. Gibbons. ^nybo~y else? Yes, Mr. Dart? .-. -"~'-------'--"-- ......--._."-~'- "'_._~" --,.,~ --.,.- ".-"_"~'-""'--="""_"'...,..._~~.....-,,_., Page i4 - Public Hearing . - Richard J. Cron 4Irnge of Zone MR. ED DART, Peconic: I am a resident. of Peconic and a local retailer and also an acquaintance of Mr. Nolan, I too would like to attest. to his character and his desire to make this a top quality type of a community. I've heard it time and time again from many of the older folks living in Town that this is something that they would like to have, a way of life that WOuld be easier for them and so in short, I would like to see favorable approval of this project. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you, Mr. Dart. Anybody else wish to be heard? Mr. Smith. MR. WILLIAM SMITH,' Southold: I broker and I have many requests people that come in the office. to the town of Cutchogue and the am a local resident and real estate for condominiums or apartments from I think this will be of great benefit Town of Southold. Thank you. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you, Mr. Smith. AnYbOdy else? Mrs. Schriever. MRS. BARBARA SCHRIEVER, Main Road, Orient: I would like to speak in favor of this application. There's a great"need for this kind of housing for older people. Speaking as a young person myself, I would say that I am really amazed that people think that there's no need for this kind of housing between Southold and Mattituck. Really amazed. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you, Mrs. Schriever.' Anybody else wish to be heard in favor of this application? Mrs. Jean Tiedke. MRS. JEAN TIEDKE, Southold: I agree, I'm not interested in senior citizen housing either, but there is certainly a need and I am in favor of this development for many reasons, a~though, I do have some qualifications. What I'd ~ike to do is not repeat some of the things that Dick Cron said about the Master Plan, which I agree. But I would like to turn this in to you later, would that 'be PosSible? SUPERVISOR PELL: Turn it into the Town Clerk, yes~ MRS. TIEDKE: Yes, I will. I would like to know what the Town's plans are with respect to a water district for the area of Cutchogue? Now, it's true it's on the biggest dome we have in the Town, which is a particular reason for taking particular care 'of it and I think that this is something,you would have to consider. Another problem I forsee is the cost to the buyer. Are inviting in those who can pa~ whatever price might be asked for luxury housing? I think what we need is a good mix and I think that a community like this, it would suggest that possibly there would be some variation in sizes of houses which might indicate a variation in cost, but I think to put in a lUxury community in the very hub of Cutchogue would be inappropriate myself, 1 think it should be a mix. This location isn't near either a wetland nor a shoreline and it certainly is near transportation, schools nnd churches nnd so on which is nIl in its favor. I think thnt you do have to consider prOviding for a variety of people when yoU Consider a development of this type. I wrote allover the edge as people were talking. And I'm not Sure that the list of advantnges which Mr, eron presented are re- ---_..--.--- '. "~';8 10 - Public H+ng - Richard J. Cron Chee of Zone an exact replica of the list of advantages which the Town Board might see as being a good reason for building a development like this. You have to look at it'very carefully to make sure it's not going to change the character of our Town which everyone talks about. We could change it to the point where we're another Southampton, and I'm not sure we want that. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you. Jean, when can you submit that? MRS. TIEDKE: Tomorrow. SUPERVISOR PELL: We want to close the hearing tonight, we don't want to have to remain open, we want it in before we close the hearing. It's on the record anyway, all the things you have said will be verbatim. Anybody else wish to speak in favor of the application? In the back. MRS. MARY McGUIRE: I'm a resident and a business woman in Mattituck and I'd just like to say that I'm in support of this and I'd like you to consider the fact that while you have to watch the denSity problem in the Township of Southold, that it might be good to consider the many people that are trying to make a successful business in this Township and that we really do need more population out here. Granted in the summertime most people do fairly well in business, but in the wintertime it seems to be a problem out here for a lot of people in business and a situation like this would certainly help the winter population because they would be year-around residents. So I'm in Support of this. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you, Mrs. McGuire. Anybody else wish to speak in favor of the change of zone? Yes, way in the back. NANCY HARRINGTON, Cutchogue: I live in a large single family house. I brought up four children here and it was wonderful, but the youngest is 21 and I think this is a magnificent idea so that I can stay in the neighborhood. SUPERVISOR PE~L: Thank you, Mrs. Harrington. Anybody else wish to be heard in favor of the change of zone in Cutchogue? ,Yes. MR. THOHAS UHLINGER, Cutchogue: I have been a Cutchogue resident for about 11 years and I am a business man in New Suffolk and I know Joe Nolan and his family quite well and I think he's going to do very well in Town, particularly if he gets his zoning approved here. I have a selfish reason, I'd like to have my mother live out here near me, yet not with me. I think this is the perfect place for it. I'm in favor of it. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you very much. Yes, way in the back. MRS. HELEN LePORIN: I have been waiting years for just such a project and I am a senior citizen. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you very much. Anybody else wish to speak in favor of this? Mr. Henry Lytle. " Page 16 - Public .aring - Richard J. Cron .nge of Zone MR. HENRY LYTLE, Peconic: As most you fellows know, I am a rep- resentative of the seniors and I guess I'm the senior senior around, and I am in contact with many of them and I've had very many requests for this type of thing. We've had a lot of people come out-here ten to fifteen years ago and they built very substantial homes and are very nicej but all of a sudden they find themselves instead of being 60 they're 75 and they're kicking 80 and they say we don't want so much to have around us, we'd like to be in a smaller spot or a place where we'd be taken care, so I think we should all vote in favor of it. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you, Mr. Lytle. Anybody else wish to be heard in favor of this application? Anybody at all in favor of this change of zone in Cutchogue from Agriculture/Residential to Multiple Dwell- ing? (No response.) Anybody wish to be hearrt in oPposition to the change? Mrs. Ruth Oliva. MRS. RUTH OLIVA, President; North Fork Environmental Council: We wish to oppose this application for a change of zone a~ this time for three reasons. First of all, it is not consistent with the present Master Plan. Secondly, ERM Northeast has drawn up the Draft Executive Summary of their water plan--water program. They have advised the Town to set up a water management program. The Town has not done so as yet. That would be my second reason to oppose it at this time, until the Town sets up the water program. Number three, the NFEC does not feel there should be any spot change of zone in the Town until the Master Plan can be updated and we can see just where we want to put our multiple dwellings. Thank you. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you, Mrs. Oliva. Anybody else wish to be heard in OPPosition to the change? Anybody to the oPPosition to the change of zone? (No response.) Any other Comment on the application at all? Anybody wish to have any comment on it before we go back to Mr. Cron? (No response.) All right, Town Board, questions? John Nickles. COUNCILMAN NICKLES: I think it was Mr. Raynor who had mentioned that ther~ is going to b~ a private water company or community water company and that was going to be built to the specifications of the Suffolk County Water Authority and that there is certain criteria that they have for the acceptance of that community water system into their domain or jurisdiction. I would like to know what that criteria is. MR. RAYNOR: As far as I know at the present time there is no established criteria for that. What I did say was that Mr. Villa told us of the Health Department's policy which was to ask the developers or anyone interested in setting up a community water supply system, first to confer with the Suffolk County Water Authority to see whether we can design it in accordance with their requirements, and to offer it to them for dedication and for them to operat-e it after it is completed and it is our intention to do that. As far as the criteria for the design, it would be in accordance with the American Water Works Association's standards and about the only thing that I would expect to be different between the type of a community water system we might do for a private ,,: ~ -""-'"'-'''---..,'"'<'':-''-' --;--,--"--,---",,~.,, < ~ " .c'<-i;e 17 - Public H.ing - Richard J. Cron Ch.e of Zone individual and not for the Suffolk County Water Authority would be in the degree of redundancy. Additional backup wells, additional storage capacity, perhaps a different type of control system, basic- ally would deliver the same quality water. I believe that one of the concerns that the Health Department has and which the Water Authority shares with them, is that they do not want to see a proliferation of small community water systems which will not, at some time in ~e future, be tied together in such a way as to serve the entire community. Since we are in probably one of the best parts of the Town of Southold to begin a community system, we would be pleased to participate in the first attempt of a community water system in Cutchogue and if that is the nucleus of the Suffolk County Water Authority involvement in this area we think it would be worthwhile for the Town to have that. COUNCILMAN NICKLES: In other words you are saying the likelihood of their--even if you may offer it to them--the likelihood of the Suffolk County Water' Authority of accepting is probably negligible at this point in time. MR. RAYNOR: I wouldn't say that. I really.. don't know because it will depend to a great extent on our ability to provide what they would look for in terms of isolation area around the wells and things of that pature. From what Mr. Villa told me in my preliminary discussion with him, he believes that the Water Authority is interested in making sure that these types of systems are not done unless they are going to be tied into a universal system if you will, something that's maintained by the Water Authority. I don't know the answer to that. I hope we are going to develop an answer that will be acceptable to you. COUNCILMAN NICKLES: We didn't either. I thought you knew the answer, that's why I asked it. SUPERVISOR PELL: Councilman Murdock. COUNCILMAN MURDOCK: I'm curious as to the width of the roads in the proposed.$ubdivision. How wide do you propose the roadways to be within this development? MR. CRON: '.1 don't think there is any determination as of this date ,as :to how wide the roads .would be. Obviously we would have to go back to the Planning Board for ultimate site plan approval and needless ~to say. whatever is required to be done in terms of the utility value of the project and it's ability to handle whatever traffic would be required, at the same time to keep it aesthetically pleaSing,would ,be done. So I cannot give you, at this juncture, a positive answer .as to the width of the roads. I would assume, and this again I guess I should not do that because there is a saying that goes with that, but I would assume that primary roads would be of a width that is currently required by the Planning Board with respect to the installa- tion of roads in any subdivision at this time. SUPERVISOR PELL: Any other Councilman have anything they would like to ask? We have a question from the floor. '''--n-'~- " ^. ..,~",,--- ..,..._....'.---.._.,.~._-_. Page 18 - PUblic~aring - Richard J. Cron ~nge of Zone MR. STEWART HARVEY, Southold: What are the chances of these roads reverting back to the Town and be in our budget then? SUPERVISOR PELL: During the presentation he said they were. going to be private roads. MR. HARVEY: And they will remain? Will not become Town roads? MR. CRON: Absolutely none. MR. HARVEY: Also, I think, with the view that' agriculture will be out on there, I think they're 'doing very good with grapes up there, and I'm sure the lawns are going to give us more pollution than the farmers do. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you for your comments. Mr. Frank Bear had his hand up. MR. FRANK BEAR, Southold: In view of the fact that it's been suggested and indicated that this would be something which would be eventually a part of the County Water Authority, I have some questions about that because the ERM report on the North Fork Water Study has recommended that there be a Town water supply system set up, prObably a Town water district, and within that district there be individual wells as well as in thickly populated areas a local water sur~ly system. So I have, still, a question in my mind about the validity of the statement that this would become a part of the County Water Authority, which does not, as I understand it, extend to this part of the county. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you for your statement, Mr. Bear. MR. CRON: I wonder if I could make a comment to that.---Mr. Raynor, go ahead. MR. RAYNOR: I reported to you the results of my discussion with Mr. Villa last summer. It was his request that we negotiate with the Suffolk (~unty Water Authority. In order to clear ~t up, we're perfectly happy to discuss with any Town agency that you are either going to set up or would like to consider setting up, making this a nucleus of their water district. Our principal intention is to provide a safe and adequate water supply for this project. If it fits into the planning for the Town to provide this as a nucleus of a water district we would be perfectly happy to. do that. In order to deal in good faith with the Suffolk County Health Depart- ment, we will also discuss it with the Suffolk County Water Authority. If the Town has a,strong feeling one way or the other about the involvement ~f the Suffolk County Water Authority I'm perfectly happy to listen to that and relay that to Mr. Villa. I have a feeling that he's already aware of that. Thank you. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you, Mr. Raynor. Any other Councilman have anything they want to ask? From the audience? MRS. ISABEL qUARTICELLI, Cutchogue: I'm a resident on Highland Road, which would be the westerly side of this proposed site. Now, ....- - ,~-........--_......".~-,--,." ._____"__~_'._7_. . , . ' .. ~be 1:;; - Public ~ing - Richard J. Cron C~ge of Zone I moved out to Cutchogue just about a year ago because of the beauty of the area. What I'm concerned about, if this proposal is approved I'm assuming there will be a fence around the units. Now, since my property faces the units I'm concerned with the height of the fence, will there be shrubbery to conceal it. I didn't move out to Cutchogue to look at a fence, and that's mainly what I'm concerned about. I moved out to a beautiful site and I'm disturbed about looking out at buildings and a fence and I'd like to know the height of the fence and what type of fence which would be surrounding this property, because they did say that there would be security provided for the residents there.' Can you just give me an idea of how this property will be fenced and secured? Thank you so much. MR. CRON: From the point of view of aesthetics, we too are concerned in that regard and we're gOing to be concerned as to what we would look at also. In terms of a fence or shrubs, there's going to be no question that the site is going to be attractively landscaped and with suitable trees as humanly Possible. In terms of security, nothing is decided at this point with respect to placing a fence directly around the perimeter. It will be made secure, but I would think that when we do it it will be done so as aesthetically pleasing not only to the people that are going to reside in the corr~unity, but also to those who may have to look at it. We are deeply concerned about the aesthetics of it and before it is ultimately done, what you see there may not necessarily be the final site plan. A lot more thought and consideration is going to go into that area. The only reason that we layed it out basically this was, was to show you that the land in question can readily accomodate 160 units proposed. There may be more clustering and i can assure you we're going to be concerned not only about our own aesthetics, but as to those who have to view it from outside the area. I can't give you any more assurance than that. It's going to be done right. SUPERVISOR PELL: a zone change? Anybody else wish to speak on this application for Yes? CONNIE SHELBY, Cutchogue: I also reside to the west of the proposed site. The question I have in my mind is the sewage treatment that would be taking place when this proposed site, if it does come to be. My main concern is water contamination, being that I live there and I certainly don't want anything to happen to my family or to the fact I may have;.to sell my house because the water is contaminated. I would just like to know what you have in mind as far as the treatment of the sewage if this comes to be. SUPERVISOR PELL: Mr. John Raynor will address that. MR. RAYNOR: We expect that the sewage treatment system to be used on the site will be conventional septic systems to the extent that the equivalent flow comparison is accurate. In other words, there is a certain flow associated with single family use which is in the design criteria of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. To the extent that we are able to meet their criteria for senior citizen housing, I expect that our sewage flows will be equivalent to single family use. Under those assumptions we will be'using --- '-+-~'~-::---~'-~-------==--'. .---------. .--'7'. .,--., . . Page 20 - Public Hearing - . , Richard J. Cron ~nge of Zone ordinary septic systems. I would expect that if it's feasible, if it's Possible to meet the Health Department's requirements and to add the new system that they've been considering, which is a nitrate removal system, that we would probably incorporate that. It depends to a great extent on the success of the water system proposals and the comparisons of the flows from single family versus senior citizen housing. That's all I know at the present time about the sewage treatment system. It may turn out that as we go through a further study of it we may incorporate some additional finer points so we can make sure that we're not contaminating that groundwater aquifer. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you, Mr. Raynor. Anybody else wish to speak on the subject at all? Judge Edwards. JUSTICE EDWARDS: On the septic system, are you talking about individual units or a centralized system? MR. RAYNOR: The usual arrangement for this type of development or site, is to use centralized systems that are associated with each cluster so that there might be for this type of site plan, perhaps six or seven separate systems. However, there would not be separate, individual septic tanks and leaching pools for each individual unit. Now, that depends to a great extent on the location of our wells for the water supply and on the separation of water between those and the septic systems. If it turns out that it is necessary to incorp- orate some more sophisticated system other than the sulphur limestone denitrification systems, then we might go to a single source of treat- ment and a dissipation of the affluent perhaps in one end of the site and the water supply on the other end. At this time I expect we would have the systems associated with each cluster and that's the way the Health Department generally prefers to see it done. . SUPERVISOR PELL: The Board of Health has something on if you have a site of 99 homes you have to have something in there? MR. RAYNeR: The Health Department has a series of requirements that relate tc' th('; use of nn ndvanced wastewater treatment plant when you exceed the equivalent flow from single family homes. In a case like this, where community water supply system would be provided, the denSity on single family homes would be one for each 20,000 square feet. The flow associated with that is 300 gallons per home, so we have 600 gallons per acre and the equivalent flow for senior citizen housing for single bedroom units would be 100 gallons per unit and for two bedroom it would be 150 gallons. I expect a mix of one and two bedroom units would still 'lead us to less than the equivalent flow from single family use and under those circumstances, I expect the Health Department will not require advance wastewater treatment. I'm going beyond that, I not only don't think the Health Department will require it, I don't think it will be necessary because would incorporate if we find in analysis that there would be a Significant increase in nitrate removal, we would go to a nitrate removal system which the Health Department has encouraged in some other situations. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you. at all? Any Board member? your right to summarize. Anybody else wish to comment on this Anybody from the audience? Mr. Cron, . , - . , " .: J-a.b'= <:O.L - ",ui..i.L_~ '.".Lj'b - Ricnard ,j. Cron cWge of Zone .- MR. CRON: Thank you. Needless to say, I was somewhat delighted to see my friend Mrs. Tiedke come up in support of this application. Her comment regarding the luxury of the development is most attractive and within the sense that luxury constitutes top quality in terms of labor of material, I'll accept the term luxury. However, it isn't intended by the use of that term, as she has used it, to exclude anybody necessarily. We are committed and I can't reiterate any more succinctly and clearly than I'm saying here this evening to a qualify project, where local people, and we live here and I intend to live here and so do my associates, so we don't intend to do any- thing that would bring shame or distraction to the Town of Southold, and certainly to the community of Cutchogue. I wasn't surprised by my friend Ruth Oliva's protestations, nor do I think the Board was either. However, I would like to say that it's the right time, the right place, it's the right people and any other time and place it would be the same. Thank you. SUPERVISOR PELL: Thank you. At this time the hearing is closed. * * * .c. _ . -..r--~ ~"-u:t{ ~~- . ....?" Lh"r ".r- Judith T. Terry t7 Southold Town Clerk .......-..~-,._.._~.... c., . "'0"0-._ .......,,_"_ . . Traffic Analysis IU I 10 ~~ I :0 ~ ] . -fL t t 1 [ [ 1 ~ 1 For SEACROFT AT CUTCHOGUE A Proposed Adult Community In The Town of Southold, New York Prepared For: Prepared By: Richard J. Cron, P .C. Main Road Cutchogue, New York DMJM 65 West Red Oak Lane White Plains, New York JANUARY 1983 ; . .:T1 "'I -,-- -J I -J , t J J "] 1 1 ~ ~ .~ .~ III ., ~ ~ , 1 -] ] -J .. C:::::VED CY sounWWi U\i11 rL;/."",~ bLARD DATS hard - c:lilu.(/v...J .:;I\i~JN1/TPG January 25, 1983 Richard J. Cron, P.C. Ma inRoad P.O. Box 953 Cutchogue, New York 11935-0032 RE: Seacroft at Cutchogue Oea r Mr. Cron: We are pleased to submit twelve copies of the final report for the traffic analysis for the Proposed Seacroft at Cutchogue Adult Community. We hope you will find them useful and beneficial in your report to the Planning Commi ss i on. We have found that the change in traffic due to the proposed development is extremely slight. The calculated level of service is "8", which is the second highest quality attainable. We based our analysis on count data provided by New York State Opeartment of Transportation, and actual turning movement counts taken by oU'r staff. Our analysis included capacity analysis of the Main Road itself, as well as analysis of the intersection of Main Road and Griffing Street. We trust that thi s study wi 11 suit your needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, /' / VV~~ C/!1c.t/,a/( Snt loJILUAM R. McGRATH, P.E. ~anager Transportation engineering '.'RM :cac DMJM Architects & Engineers 65 West Red Oak lane White Plains, New York 10604 Telephone: 914/694.2400 Planning Architecture Engineering Systems Economics ~ ~ . ., TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction Development Characteristics 2 Tri p Generat i on 3 Traffic Assignment 7 10 Capacity Analysi s Consl usions 11 11 References Appendix A Appendix B LIST OF FIGURES lA AM Peak Hour Exi st i ng Traffi c 8 1 B Midday Peak Hour Existing Traffic 8 1 C PM Peak Hour Exi sting Traffic 8 2A AM Peak Hour Generated Traffic 9 2B PM Peak Hour Generated Traffi c 9 , .. .. Introduct i on Seacroft, at Cutchogue is a proposed adult community development which is to be located on a 46.16 acre site at the northern end of Griffing Street, approximately 1000 feet north of Main Road in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, New York. The Main Road is State Highway Route 25 and extends the entire length of Long Island, from the Queensborough Bridge in Queens County (New York City) through Queens County, Nassau County and Suffol k County, and along the north fork to Orient Point. The site is presently zoned for single family residential dwellings on 40,OOQ squa re foot lots (" A" Zone). It is presentl y undeveloped. The proposed development would require a change to "M" zoning, or multiple dwelling units with a maximum density of 6.9 units per acre. This report is designed to address the traffic which will be generated by the proposed development, and its effects on the existing roadway system. It is presented to the Southold Town Planning Board in order to provide information and to aid them in their decision making process. [ D D D [: [ [ D ~ [ [' r -~ 1) l( r . '" Oevelopment Characteristics The site is a 46.16 acre parcel of land which is currently zoned for single far:1ily dwelling units on 40,000 square foot lots. Under maximum development, there could be 45 dwelling units built on the site. If the zoning is changed to "M" zoning, the allowable density would be 6.9 units per acre, or 318 units. However, the proposed development is for only 160 units, or approximately one-half the maximum allowable density. The proposed development is designed as an "adult community" with certain restrictions as to who may occupy the units. Primarily, there must be at least one adult over age 55 in the family, and no child may be under age 19. There are four general types of units with sizes ranging from 1300 to 2200 square feet per unit. Each building of four units will have approximately 5300 square feet. A substantial number of retired persons and single person occupants (e.g. widows and widowers) are anticipated due to the size of the units, location of the site, and nature of the development. These factors tend toward an average occupancy rate which is considerably helow single family detached housing or apartment housing, probably under two persons per dwelling unit. Trip generation rates, while higher than a designated Retirement Community, will also he lower than apartment dwelling unit rates. The next section describes in detail the methods used to generate the traffic levels which are anticipated for this development. Access to the site will be closely controlled, and located at a single point, the northern end of Griffing Street. There may be other points used for emergency access, hut these will be closed to normal traffic. Most of the traffic entering and exiting the development will use Griffing Street to the Main Road (Rt. 25). However, some traffic can be expected to use Schoolhouse Road to Depot Lane, which provides direct access to the North Road bypass route. North Road would generally be used only by traffic leaving the area, while it is expected that most local traffic would use the Main Road. Since the majority of the traffic can be expected to use the Main Road, the traffic analysis centers around the intersection of Griffing Street and Main Road. 2 r . ., Tri p Generat i on The first step in the traffic analysis procedure is to determine the amount of traffic which can be expected to be generated by the development. In instances where some other facilities are being removed in order to make way for the new development, the traffic generated by the old facility must also be measured. However, since there is no existing development at this site, there is no existing traffic to be measured or calculated. New traffic can be estimated through the use of "Trip Generation Factors", which are compilations of data from existing similar developments. Such factors are usually based on some independent variable, such as number of units, square feet of area, number of seats, acres of development, number of occupants, etc. They are the results of multiple studies where actual trips have been measured for a particular type of development. One of the most widely used compilations of such factors is the TRIP GENERATION manual pub 1 i shed by the In st itute of Transpo rtat i on Eng i neers ( !TE). Thi s manual was originally compil ed by the ITE in 1976, and undergoes constant updating as new information becomes available. The generation factors are divided into ten main sections of development types. Section 200 - Residential is itself divided into eight subsections. The factors dlscussed hereln come from applicable parts of these sections. In order to estimate the amount of traffic which will be generated by the proposed development, the factors and independent variables must be examined to select the proper factors. Present zoning allows for development of single family detached dwelling units which has the highest trip generation rate. This type of unit would generate 10 trip-ends per day per unit. (A trip-end is a trip which either begins or ends at the place in question. Therefore, one round trip of a vehicle is accounted as two trip-ends.) During peak hours, there would be 0.8 vehicles in the morning and 1.0 vehicles in the afternoon expected to enter and exit from the site, per dwelling unit. On the other hand, the lowest rates are found for retirement community developments, with only 3.3 trip-ends per day per unit, and 0.4 vehicles in the morning and 0.4 vehicles in the evening peak hour entering and exiting from the site, per dwelling unit. Trip generation rates for several types of residential developments and for l several independent variables are sUf'lmarized as follows: ~ , - J 3 r ~- rr .-j, ,. .~-~ -y- 'i .:~2 --l' > _.;t -, .,:'; ENTER EXIT TOTAL -1 'lit- .;,~: , , 1 . , ENTER EXIT TOTAL ~ ~ J] I I c~1 I I ENTER EXIT TOTAL . . SECTION 210 - SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOUSING Average Density = 3.5 Units/Acres Average Occupancy = 3.7 Persons/Unit Average Auto Ownership - 1.6 Vehicles/I~it TRIPS PER DWELLING UNIT (PEAK HOUR) (10 DAILY TRIP-ENDS PER DWELLING UNIT) A.M. P.M. 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.4 1.0 TRIPS PER PERSON (PEAK HOUR) (2.5 DAILY TRIP-ENDS PER PERSON) A.M. P.M. 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 SECTION 220 - APARTMENTS Average Density = 21.7 Units/Acre Average Occupancy = 2.1 Persons/Unit Average Auto Ownership = 1.3 Vehicles/Unit 221 - Low Rise Apartments (1-2 Levels) TRIPS PER DWELLING UNIT (PEAK HOUR) (5.4 DAILY TRIP-ENDS PER DWELLING UNIT) A.M. P.M. 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.6 4 I - -',l -' -;j - Jl ; j I . . SECTION 230 - CONDOMINIUM TRIPS PER DWELLING UNIT (PEAK HOUR) (5.6 DAILY TRIP-ENOS PER DWELLING UNIT) A.M. P.M. ENTER EXIT TOTAL 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.4 TRIPS PER PERSON (PEAK HOUR) (1.93 DAILY TRIP-ENOS PER PERSON) A.M. P.M. ENTER EXIT TOTAL 0.04 0.14 0.18 0.13 0.01i 0.19 SECTION 250 - RETIREMENT COMMUNITY - TRIPS PER DWELLING UNIT (PEAK HOUR) (3.3 DAILY TRIP-ENOS PER DWELLING UNIT) A.M. P.M. ENTER N.A. N.A. EXIT N. A. N.A. TOTAL 0.4 0.4 From the above tables, generation factors are chosen by comparing the characteristics of each section with the characteristics of the proposerl r rlevelopment. i f: , 5 I , J ~ . .. ,; nce the proposed development is for an adul t commun i ty, it can be expected ',0 he quite similar to the Retirement Community (Section 250) factors. Since condominiums and low rise apartments have similar trip generation characteristics, but have a higher occupancy rate and automobile ownership rate than can be expected within this development, the factors for this development were chosen between these two categories as follows: DEVELOPMENT FACTORS TRIPS PER D\~ELLING UNIT (PEAK HOUR) (4.4 DAILY TRIP-ENOS PER DWELLING UNIT) A.M. P.M. ENTER EXIT TOTAL 0.10 0.35 0.45 0.35 0.15 0.50 This leads to the following conclusions: PEAK HOUR GENERATED TRIPS A.M. P.M. ENTER EXIT TOTAL 16 56 72 56 24 80 The total number of trip-ends will be 704 per week day, or approximately 350 entering and leaving vehicles (over a 24 hour daily period.) 6 r - -, ~ , 1 J I i ~l -1 .. .. Traffic Assignment The New York State Department of Transportation (DOT) keeps records of various types, including traffic levels, on their highways. Main Road is New York State Route 25, and the DOT region office in Hauppauge indicated that Main Road had a 7000 vehicle ADT. AnT is the Average Daily Traffic, and is based on averaging daily traffic count data for several days throughout the year. For a roadway with 7000 vehicles/day, the Transporatation and Traffic Engineering Handbook, puhlished by ITE, shows that approximately 9.0% of the AnT will pass a given point during the peak hour (in both directions). This is 630 vehicles in the peak hour (in both directions). Manual turning movement counts were taken at the intersection of Main Road and Griffing Street and compared to the peak hour volume ohtained frcxn the ADT. The highest volumes, which occurred during the PM peak hour, verified the count information. Count summaries are included in Appendix A. Existing turning movement di agrams are shown in figures I A, I B and I C for morning, mid-day and afternoon peak hours. The generated traffic is then split between Schoolhouse Road and Griffing Street, with an estimated 85% of the traffic to pass through the intersection of Griffing Street and Main Road. The generated traffic is then added to the existing volumes with the results shown in Figures 2A and 2R for morning and afternoon peak hours. All volumes are rounded to the nearest 5 vehicles. 7 ~ t g> I ~;;::: rt>'rtJ ~ Main Road D c.. CJ L56 _ 310 ~ -254 479~ 33 202- 169_ r 1 , ( f C i [{ [i [, ~ rp -~ ~ Jl .. '" '" u -277 ...... Q) Q) .... ...... CI) ..- N @ .. ~ 502 192 . FIGURE 1 A AM Peak Hour Existing Traffic (Veh.lHr.) ...... ~t ~ ~ t Ol L ~ ~ '" ~ .... Main Road "'.. CJ _286 ~ l... L54 " -257 582 ~ 24 ---' 296 - 272 __ '" '" ~ N @ __311 ~629 318___ II :I '.. , u.. ~ ~ ) -1 11 l' r1 FIGURE 1 B Midday Peak Hour, Existing Traffic (Veh.lHr.) co o Main Road Jt ! 1 - '" '" DC. ~273 623 - - 28-1 322- 350_ ...... Q) Q) .... ...... CI) Ol r:: ;;::: ..... .C CJ ~27 ---262 N @ ---289 --:I::...- 653 364- FIGURE 1 C PM Peak Hour Existing Traffic (Veh.lHr.) 8 iL f [ f [, ~ Lr [, ) 1 r I .. . I c-t .. '" ... '" - H - (l) t (l) N .)=, U) ~ 0 OJ '" c ! '" ~ 0 - ..... (') '" '" 0L Main Road ... 300 ~65 -<< 320 40~ 255 510 ~ .:- t ~ 535 210 . 170 . 215 . ''l"f .:; FIGURE 2A AM PEAK HOUR GENERA TED TRAFFIC (VehJHr.) -1 '" r<:'1 r- - !t - - (l) (l) .)=, N U) t OJ ~ '" C r- ;g '" ~ 0 0 (') 0 - D C ~50 Main Road - ~ 275 C 310 . 260 645 .. . 50~ ~ 690 . - 370 .. 320 .. 380 ,.. ? -tl FIGURE 28 PM PEAK HOUR GENERATED TRAFFIC (Veh./Hr.) 9 [~ c [ ~ 1 ~ 11 J1 I ,1 .. ... Capacity Analysis The useful capacity of a roadway is the maximum number of vehicles which can pass a given point on the roadway over a given period of time. The capacity, which is a flow rate, is usually given in terms of passenger cars per hour, even though the period of time over which the measurement is taken may not be an hour. By calculating a roadway's capacity, the ratio of volume actually on the road to the capcity can be calculated. This ratio, called v/c is used to determine the level of Service of the roadway. level of Service describes the flow condition - "A" being extremely good and free flowing, and "F" being a complete jam. The methods for calculating the capacity of a roadway are prolonged, and will not be detailed here. Basically, a maximum potential service volume of 2000 passenger cars per hour (both directions) is adjusted by factors to take into account the physical properties of the roadway: grade, width, lateral clearance, traffic composition, bus stops, parking, etc. The adjusted numher is the capacity of the roadway (Reference #2). The calculation is: CAPACITY = (MSV) X (W) X (T) X (B) X (RV) Where MSV = W = T = B RV = Max imum Serv i ce Volume Width Adj ustment Factor Truck Adj ustment Factor (5%) (measured) Bus Adj ustment Factor (I %) (measured) Recreation Vehicle Factor (10%) (estimated) CAPACITY 2000 x 0.96 x 0.93 x 1.00 x 0.87 1553 veh./hr. say 1550 = AM V/C PM V/C = 535/1550 = 0.34 = level of Service "B" = 630/1550 = 0.45 = level of Service "fl" In addition to checking the effects of the added traffic on the mainline roadway, the intersection's capacity must also he analyzed. Critical movement analysis of the Griffing Street and Main Road Intersection is includerl in Appendix fl for AM and PM peak hours. They indicate that the intersection will operate at level of Service "R" as well. I 0 L I [ t ~ [. [ , .. I [I [ [ I "" 1 I -J I J~ I~ I ... ., Conclusions Presently, the highway has a peak two directional flow of 650 veh./hr. This yields a vlc of 0.42, which is level of Service "B". With the proposed development, the vlc only changes to 0.45 still yielding level of Service "B" and adding only small amounts of traffic to the roadway. Furthermore, the intersection of Main Road and Griffing Street also operates at level of Service II BIl. In summary, the proposed development will generate trips and 700 trip-ends throughout the entire day. impact on the operating conditions of the roadway, vehicles per day. a total of 80 peak period This should have minimal which currently carries 7000 References: 1. Trip Generation, The Institute of Transportation Engineers 1979 and 1976, Section 200. 2. Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook, Second Edition, The lnstltute ot IransportatlOn I:nglneers, IYHL and 1976, Pages 255ff; Page 489ff. 3. Transportation Research Board Circular 212, "Interim Highway Capacity Analysi s (The Critical lane Method). 11 ~ .. [! .. ! [! [i APPENDIX A ;, , - I 1 1 1 - , [ .,. .Jl ! J J ! ~, J J L " DMJNI Planning 1"\ PE.AK Pe:R.IO!) Architecture Engineering LO LJ N r S () fI1 iYl 1+ R.. '( Syslems Economics K~ ~5" ~ (,.f2..IFI",N 5, JOBNa. /44(.,-0/-01 SHEET No. I ~eAc...R~ A-r G UT(... HO/;,u.:?' DESIGNED BY W DATE 7/z.ds!. R.\c..\-l'I'tRj) .:r: 6i?O-V, P, C. APPROveO cOJtJrB't'SFM IJl "< N :t~ / \ '" ~ j. ~ <!l ~ ~ G) ).. CAP,S ~ovTlO. c...'5" (TRv'(~) PHY' 0,.,< TIME 0 @ @ 8) (3 0 AM :f:l I 55 -L 1 I 1:IS-7:30 [q) (0) - (0) ll) ( 0) l. 0) 7:30 -7tlft'" 40 I , :Jj) ~ ~ -1 (0) ( 0) (5) (0) ( 0) lo) 7:<+S-6:00 SO ~ :7.i- -1:L -L ~ (0) (0) (~) {oj (L' ) (>1 g~oo-8',I!:'" Xl 2- 7fo R "2- -B. - 74- ) D (3) CO) ( 0) (D) 3-Z Jl 2- -2- .$ 4 ~ 2> " I ~ - 8: ~c) (1...) ( ,) (I) (z..-) (0) ~ 6 " z 6:50-8:'+1 3S'" 11 .if Ita 10 .;;- ).L 7z-) - - b) (0) (7) ( 0) (0) ~ 8: 4S'" -9:00 49 ih 15 E:. ..fL f:r I &) (0) (0) , I,' " T { C , [ 7 _)1 'II I t ! ~ [ I [I ~ I DMJJI Planning P6~\ol) , fM PeA K Archileclure Engineering C00 rV\ StJ rt'lM ~R.1 Syslems Economics Ko.Y1C:. ~5" ~ (,.-F'-IF!=,,J S, JOB No. , 44(.,-0/-01 SHEET No. J SEACKo9'I Per o UTe... HOt;, tJc: DESIGNED BY ~ DATE 11].'-\ I c;:>..:\ R\c:..\.HtAD .:r: c....K 0 Ai J P. c.. APPROVED (ovoJ' B'1' Srm I.IT "< /I\N .; ~; .... "" ~ ~ ~ @) @ ... G) ~ CAI\S RovT~ c.. ~ (T"v'I(~) . ?l"\\="-=- 0 ~\ TIME 0) @ @) G) 0 0 PM .EL 1/ laD. 7 m /2- ::", ~o -~ :'tS' (0) (0) (3) ID) 10) "3 : ,-+5"- 1.\',1.)<) 7t..- ~ (ff .2. If I (-;;) {oj ( 0) T;;) 1-:;) 4:00-4',1) .2k- s- -:J..:l:- ~ (~ ..!:L b) ( 0) (0 ) (0) 70) Iv) 7~ :!:1 ..::L "2- , S +'20 ::s- 6 - 4,1 - ,-, ~ (U) '" (-3) (5) (D') (c.) ') 0 .2Q.. ~ 7.s- ~ :3 :t- 4- ~3o-4:4-5'" - ~ 705 (2-) (OJ (0) II <t 7& - ~ ~, ~ 53 5: 10 ~ 4..tj--r-s .00 - - r;J) - (-;) ( OJ ( 0) ( OJ (()) .. .. c .. . APPENDIX B , ~ I I I · 'nS,gnaliled "T"' Intersection cap~alculation Form (::...,-;=1 RovTC t,~~ 9 f:,(IFPu(6- $/' fl!rfl1 Pe4'K (-.ky(..Qo Ct\tJfll\ IrHcr\Cdllln LOC':lllon Plan . A u C Hourly Dem:itnd Traffic Volume!> from _ _ .~ 10 _ n. ._ . ___ _ m Approa~.h A "\ B 7 c -y- Movemenl A,- A, ., B, r B, - c '\ C,r I Volume 2'SS {,~ 4-0 \"7" 4,<:"" 4S' pch I........ r;ot.....'l Step I IUeht Thrn from C C, r Conflicting Flows... MH = 'h All + A, ~ (from Fig. I) ~ + 1.Sr ~ 2.S 7... Critical Gap from Table 2 T. .." -k.Q.5<< -L Capacity from Fig. 2 - 1.1", = 1.1, = 740~. SIwed u". - s.. Slep ) - ~o Shared Lane Demand = C.=_JIC'A Available Reserve = MJ-CIt""'_KIl Delay &. Level o[$crvicc (Table JJ CJ Step 2 Left Thrn from B B" r Conflicting Rows... MH oz A. + AT - (from Fig. II .-'&... + ~ = ~... Critical Gap from Table 2 T. ... ..::L...D.. see CapacilY from Fig. 2 - MoN. ... Mz -= BSo,lO('O\ Demand = B, = _i-f.Q~. Capaci(y Used = 100 (BUM.) = ~ 'k lmp:d.a.nce Factor (rom Fig. .l .,. PI = o.9~ Available Reserve: = MI-BL=~~" Delay & Level of Scrvice (fable 3) AI" I) F. U" i [18 Step) Len Thrn from C C" '\ . Connicting Flows = MH = IhA... + AT + BL + BT = -- (from Fig. I) ..ll + ~+ ~+ !.12 - ..ill... Critical Gap (rom Table 2 T. .. ~5<< Capacily from Fig. 2 ~ M..~ :to30... --'--', Adjust (or Im~ .. - MN. X p. - 1.1, =.. :} 2"S"... - No ShaL<d lAnc: Demand = CL=_WA Ayailable Reserve ... M3-CL=_JO("/l Delay'" Leyel of Service (Table J) CJ Shared Lane Demand = C,,+CL=CIIL= ~""A -- Shared L3l1e with Rig:hl Turn ICII' + C,,) Capacify of Sh:J.fed Lane = Mil = fC.,IM,1 + (C,/M,> 4 ri) I MI]=~_" Avaj/;:able Reserve: "" Mu - CIU. = 3 ("O~. Delay'" Level ofScrvicc (Table J) CSJ OvenUI EvaJuatlon . IN TP-!2 See. IT ON Dille L Da) Time CtlnlHll Prc'l....ihn~ Spec:": -:'~---::----r.__._ ,~- (") 9E12.A-~ II " A- J (.PS;))GL.- OF SeGl1/Ge g t -. . ~. ~.. l'dHr"1 ' vn:;,yna 110 nlursectlOn ... CapaCity Calculation Form f'/Vl Pe-....", r40<J,<- Ol Inll:I'<:lllUf1 Roun; 2...";- "l CoR. \ i=F,A)'-t S T LOC;III(>" PL.w CoIU/ll\ ^ 1J;j1t' Da\ ,. n TIme: Cunlrol rrc\';ulm~ SrceJ ( Hourly Demand Tr:tfTle Volumc\ lrom ,<> Appmal"h A '\ n 7 c --y- - Mo...cmem A, - A. '\ Il, I Il, - C" ~:. r- 32c '-,-- Volume: '2,(..0 !SO !So (,,0 IS" pch I.....,. r..n,.., I Slep I !tij:h' Thm from C C. r Conflicting Flows = MH == 'h A" + A, = ((rom Fig. , I Zs" + ..2,t..c> = .l:..<e5"" "'" Critical Gap from Table.2 T. = ~s<c L CapacilY (rom Fig. 1 == 1-.1....= M, == .2...!:!....!!.~. Slured Lane - See S,ep ) - ....0 Shared Lane Demand = Clt.=_~. Available Reserve == M1-C"=_PCIl Delay & Level of Service (Table J) 0 Slep2 Lell Thm (rom 8 8" r Cont1icting Flows == MH == A. + A, = ((rom Fig. I) . ,5;0 + 2G..Q = 3/0"", Critical Gap (rom Table 2 T.. == ~s<c Capacity (rom Fig. 2 ." M..... == M2 == g~O..:'.. Demand = B,=~D ~. Capaci{y Used == 100 (BJM,) = ~ ~ (mpedance Factor (rom Fig. ) = p,=~ Available Reserve == M, - B, = 830~. Delay & uvel of Service (Table J) No.') \) e. .........-( (][] SlepJ Len Thm (rom (' C, " Conflicting Flows = MN = YlA.t + AT + BL + BT = (from Fig. I) 2.S:+Zki)+ 5<>+ 3lO~ bSS _ Cri(;caJ Gap from Table 2 T, = ....J..:L s<c Capacity from Fig. 2 = - 34-0 M",-._~ Adjust for Impedance: M". x P, = MJ = III '>d - No ShU<d lAne ~mand = CL=_"'-.Il Ayailable Reserve I: M,,-CL=_1'<"f'l Delay & uyel of Service (Table JJ 0 Sha.n:d Lane Demand == 1M" = elf + Ct = C lit == -2....L P<"~ .._~ Shared L1Jle with R ithf Turn ICII"f- C,l Capacity of Sh.Jred Lane :; I 1C..l1l.111"f- (CdMJI , Mu = .31..~ ,...~ I Available Reserve = Mu - CIU. = '3 oC> .....11 Delay & Level of ServIce (Table J) [13J . .__ _ OJ OveraU EvaJuation I N 'Ie; Ii?. S, fOe... T7 0 l\J .. .. LevlSL of:. See-via & ()J?e:(1-. "-TES +T . ._-~-_.. . . ~ ~~ '-- -- \} .' ,(r~ //Y-;'r.n/, 1 ~-_ "';-~""':.. VSs,r:; J(I'';~... l\)Y.5::) ,.i!:V~~(~) ~ ~"A"" ,~, ";.:::.:;:,. ' i?il:' H'h. . :":">>' ~.~: ~ ,~. . f-?;., ~\t.f'. ~. ;:~~~__'~~Z-~;~"f;~::,._;~\:j) "'-' if] J ., ,'~'1} ,,,:,: ',l ','V :r~:z;a.i:[J...V Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York Ilnl TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL ST.-\TISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 8, 1982 Southo1d Town Planning Board: The Town Board declared themselves lead agency in the matter of the application of Richard J. Cron for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Light Multiple Residence District on certain property on the north side of School House Road, Cutchogue, at their October 5, 1982 meeting. ~ti'~ Southold Town Clerk ., . .~ . - ,<:~~'~~<;- I.,;.ji""~.\'ll'.~: ;,~. f' _ ........ . /. "", 1";,- '-'-/~.,-~~:-, ....l.,- '-: ,.... I ~-~ ....: ...., (f: (1\:'- ~- ~ I " ~ ~A; \ '.: . , . 't';>tt ." ..... ~--j.....; ; : . ~ "'-. " . . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 ..."':;:.....;, " JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR 01: VITAL STYliSTIC'S '_'_', t- " -~....;..'.~.,~:.-~-. .. "---...~' . OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 6, 1982 Mr. David DeRidder Environmental Analysis Unit N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation Building 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. DeRidder: - , Enclosed is application of Richard J. Cron for a Change of Zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Light Multiple Residence District on certain property located on the north side of School House Road, Cutchogue, New York. This project is unlisted and our initial determination of non-significance has been made and we wish to coordinate this action to conform our initial determination in our role as lead agency. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until October 25, 1982. We shall interpret your lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency. Very truly yours, c4d~/~~~ Judith T. Terry Town Clerk Enclosures cc: Commissioner Flacke Southold Town Building Department \.1\ /-l.1~,~ " ^V'. \..., '^, . w " . ~,\'r>~~ ~/~NIN(}-~" ~l{D '''>v'':~'''::,'''''<,''''';',.'' ", -,=" . .:--~ ',"/'.' ;"~'~ ~ ~ T~WN ,9,'" ~~Q"u ',~" ~p~D ~i--""_ \'i~~'t, r-,-,!1 ltEFq9.~~O 'filJ,Y ~'~~~\ <t(}./. :;ic 1\ Southold, N.Y. 11971 HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr.. Cluzirman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKJ. Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr. WILUAM F. MULLEN, Jr. TELEPHONE 765.1938 December 6, 1982 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mrs. Terry: Would you please supply our board with any information you might have regarding the Town Board's declaration of lead agency in the matter of the Change of Zone applications for Jem Realty (Kontokosta) and Richard J. Cron located at Cutchogue. It was the concensus of the Board to request such information for our files. Thank you. Very truly yours, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Susan E. Long, Secretary .~ '~ . . pg. (10) 8/30/82 On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was I RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead aaencv with regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the minor subdivision of Richard J. Cron, located near Greenport. An initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski * * * * * * * * Adult Condominium Community - Mr. Richard Cron, attorney and interested party, introduced Bill Carroll and Jde Nollan partners in this develop- ment along with Donald Dennis; architect and John Raynor; water and sewerage to the members of the Planning Board. Mr. Cron stated this property has been before the Town Board for a change of zone for the development of Leisure Greens to contain 296 units on the approximately 46 acres of land located behind the Sacred Heat Church in Cutchogue. The present proposal is for approximately 160 units, for the preserva- tion of open space, to be used as a residential community with age re- strictions with a minimum of 55 years old and children 19 years and older. The site would consist of 40 bUilding, 4 units each, with garages located in the rear. Amenities such as tennis courts, swim- ming pool, putting green are proposed for the area. Mr. Cron stated heC had not yet filed his application with the Town Board, but would hope the Planning Board would look in favor of this proposal when it is re- ferred by the Town Board. Mr. Cron also stated the roads would never become town road as they propose a security system for this area. Mr. Raynor stated that he would not be participating in this project as Mr. Carroll is a member of his family. * * * * * * * * East End SuPply Company - Mr. Burden and Mr. Irving Price, Esq. met with the board for a presubmission conference on this site plan. Mr. Corwin informed Mr. Raynor that there are no covenants or restrictions on this property and it will be supplied by Public Water. The board stated they would eventually require a drainage plan for this site so that stormwater would be retained on the site. Mr. Corwin stated the eXisting building has already been approved for a special exception many years ago. Mr. Raynor read correspondence from the Superinten- dent of Highways regarding fencing and curbs. It was the concensus of the Planning Board to field inspect this property prior to the next meeting of the Planning Board. * * * * * * * * l : , " Ii... .w . ~~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT . SHORT FORM INSTRUCTIONS: --- (a) In order to answer thequestians in this short EAF it is as d that the preparer will use currently available information conCCrningS~~C project and the likely impacts of the action. It is not expected that )e additional studies, research ar other investigations will be undertake (b) If any question has been answered Yes the project moy be . n. significant and 0 completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessary. (c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that this project is not significant. . . (d) Environmental Assessment 1. Will project result ina large physical change . ta the project site or physically alter more / t.han 10 acres af land?...... ................. ._Yes-.i..No 2. Will there be 0 majar change to any unique or unusual land form found on the site?.....;... Yes y No 3. Will project alter or have a large effect on - --- existing body af water?...................... Y=s X No 4. Will project have a potentially large impact ~ ~ on groundwater qyality?......................_Yes-X-~o 5. Will project significantly effect drainage flo\'l on adjacent sites?.......~...............-'--Yes-X-No 6. -Will project affect any threatened or endangered plant or animal species?.........._Ycs-X-No 7. Will project result in a major adverse effect on air quality?............................. ._Yes-X-No 8. Will project have a major effect on visual character of the community ar scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? Yes X No 9. Will project adversely impact any site or -.- structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance or any site designated as a critical environmental area X by a local agency?................................._......... Yes No 10. Will project hove 0 major effect On existing - - or future recreational opportunities?........ Yes X No 11. Will project result in major traffic problems - --- or couse a major effect to existing transportation systems?...................... Yes X No 12. Will project regularly couse objectionable - - od~rs, noise, glore, vibration, or electrical disturbanc~ as a result of the project's operation?........~.......................... Yes X No 13. Will project hove any impact on public health -- or. safety?...... . ...... .. . . ................ . ._Yes-X-No 14. Will project affect the existing community by directly causing a growth in permanent population of more than 5 percent over a one year period or hove a major negative effect on the character of the community or neighborhood?..... .. ..... .. .................. . Yes X No Is there public controversy concerning the - - project?.. ...... ............................ Yes...x-No PREPARER'S SIGNATUR y./ ~~ REPRESENTING_ ~~~a1 DATE 9/10/82 - -. 15. . . T Southold, N.Y. II9?I HENRY E. RA YNOR,Jr., Chairman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr. WILUAM F. MULLEN, Jr. TELEPHONE 765-1938 December 6, 1982 Southold Town Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Richard J. Cron Change of Zone Application Gentlemen: After an on site field review and discussion at our regular meeting November 9, 1982 the Planning Board took the following action regarding the application for the Change of Zone for certain property located at Cutchogue. Henry E. Raynor, Chairman, abstaineQ from both discussion and action on this proposal. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend denial to the Town Board for the proposed chanqe of zone of Richard J. Cron from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Light Multiple Residence District on certain property located at Cutchogu~ stipulat- ing agreement with Planning Board resolution dated March 22, 1974: "This recommendation was made in view of the fact that the Planninq Board presented in the master plan the conception that there be no multiple residences between Mattituck and Southold and this was sup- ported by 85% of the people." The board stated they did not see a need for a change of zone for"the area in question. Very truly yours, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTH OLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Susan E. Long, Secretary cc: Richard J. Cron r. , r~ . . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 6, 1982 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is petition of Richard J. Cron requesting a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agri- cultural District to "M" Light Multiple Residence District on certain property at Cutchogue, New York. You are hereby instructed to prepare an official report defining the conditions described in said petition and determine the area so affected with your recommendations. Very truly yours, ~ Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Attachment (0."o'^ .c\l\'!,~ . . - f '. .- CASE NO: .....~/: STATE OF NEW YORK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IN THE. MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FOR A CHANGE, MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDIN- ANCE m' THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. RECEIVED: OCT 41982 PETITION :r own Clerk Southold ............................................................,................ TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: 1. I, .......~~...~....CJQM...................... ,residing at ..........~~~. .~.~.~#.~l~.~. ............... (lnsert name of petitioner) . o~ the ootlon... . Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am ...of certam real property Situated at .........~.~...... ....................... and more particularly bounded and described as follows: (AS ,aa AlI1RBXID Ic:DDULZ A DBSCItII''1'IOlf 0" PRBMI.Z8) 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and amend thlo: Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including the Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: "roa "A" ba1dant.1al-Aqdou1t.l.U'al DLat.dct U) "Ill" L19bt. Mult1pl_ R.ea1dence Dt.utet.. . . - , 3. Such request is made for the following reasons: Petitioners deaire to create & planDed adult. residential O'-""'lity cons18tillq of 160 .1I191e faally reaic!enU&l unit. together with a O)A .'I~ity ceIlter for the exclusive uae of property owners. It will be required that at least one (1) adult owner llhall have attailled a aiIlJlua age of f1f~flve (55) years and that DO child ..y perlUDeDtly reside 111 & Wlit who 18 ~er the &ge of D1Ileteen (19) years. STATE OF NEW YORK, ) ) SS:- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ) RICHARD J. CBON .., . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. .. , BEING DULY SWORN, deposes and says that he is the petitioner in the within action; that he has read the foregoing Petition and knows the contents thereof; that the same is true to his (her) own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and he lief, and that as to those matters he believes it to be true. ........ RicbUc!' 'j~' .<:rOD.......... Sworn to before me this .~~~day of ... ~~~......., 19. .~~ . . . . Y.z ,,;c. ~;i~(>c.~~4f'~/ . . . . .... .. . . .. . 1''-.... Notary Public. JANE FLATLEY NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No. ~2.-46654] 8, Suffolk County _./ ' CommJ.sslon Expires March 30. 19~ . SCIIEDCLE A (DescriptiOn of Premises) . - . :\11 t~l~lt (l'rt:]ln plot. pil.:'cl.: or p:Hcd of bnJ, with the huilJillgS ~nd llllprOVl:lllcnts thaeon erected, situate, Iywpnd bo"'g lXIxbc at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is located the following four courses and distances from the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly line of Main Road and the westerly line of Griffing Street: (1) North 400 23' 10" ;vest 73.50 feet; (2) North. 420 29' 30" West 218.70 feet; (3) North 420 09' 00" \~est 140.27 :teet; (4) North 380 32' 40" \'Iest 642.92 feet; running thence from said point of beginning along other land of Leisure Greens, Inc. South 520 55' 20" \vest 162.41 feet to land of The Roman Catholic Church of the Sacred Heart at Cutchogue; running thence along said last mentionen land the following two courses and distances: (1) North 370 13' 30" ,'lest 400.00 feet; (2) South 530 05' 40" West 407.11 feet to land now or formerly of Greiner and Pelkovsky; running thence along said last mentioned land North 360 54' 20" West 2009.51 feet to land now or formerly of Zuhoski; running thence along said last mentioned land North 500 18' 10" East 251.03 feet to land now or formerly of Beebe; running thence along said last mentioned land the following three courses and distances: (1) north 560 00' 50" East 145.28 feet; (2) South 370 13' 30" East 221.47 feet; (3) North 390 29' 10" East 563.41 feet to land now or formerly of Kurczewski; running thence along said last mentioned land South .380 30' 50" East 1901.44 feet to land now or formerly of Tyler; running thence along said last mentioned land the following two courses ,md distances: (1) South 370 38' 50" ":est 210.23 feet: (2) South ]70 04' 40" East 273.68 feet to land nm.' or fOrT'1erly of the Town of Southold; running thence along said last mentioned land the following two courses and distances: (1) ~outh 520 55' 20" West 170.00 feet; (2) South 370 04' 40" Last 95.00 feet to the northerly side of School House Road; running thence along the northerly side of School House Road South 520 55' 20" West 55.10 feet to the point or place of BEGI2JNING. . . - TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: The undersigned, optioneffito purchase the premises described in Schedule A Description of Premises annexed to the Petition for change of zone, do hereby authorize RICHARD J. CRON, as an optionee to purchase said premises, to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold for a change of zone from "A" Residential-Agricultural District to "M" Light Multiple-Residence District. Dated: September 10, 1982 ~ ~ '-j'71~ Joseph Nolan ~a .~4Y william . a . . - ,- TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: The undersigned, LEISURE GREENS, INC., owner of premises situate at Cutchogue, New York, more specifically described in the Schedule A Description of Premises annexed to the Petition for change of zone being submitted by RICHARD J. CRON, an optionee to purchase said premises, does hereby authorize said RICHARD J. CRON, as an opti~nee, to submit the annexed Petition for change of zone from an "A" Residential-Agricultural District to an "M" Light Multiple--Residence District. This consent and authorization shall remain in full force and effect until revoked in writing by the undersigned. DATED: September 10, 1982 LEISURE GREENS, INC. ~~ By: ./ t~s~den . . .;;.;--- , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM INSTRUCTIm,s: (a) In order ta answer the questions in this short EAF it is assume that the preparer will use currently available infarmation concerning the project and the likely impacts of the action. It is not expected that additional studies, research or other investigations will be undertaken. (b) If any questian has been answered Yes the project may be significant and a completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessary. (c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that this project is not significant. . (d) Environmental Assessment 1. Will project result ina large physical chonge to the project site or physically alte~ more than 10 acres of land?....................... Yes 2. Will there be a major change to any unique or --- unusual land form found on the site?.....;... Yes X No 3. Will project alter or have a large effect on --- ---. existing body of water?...................... Yes x No 4. Will project have a potentially large impact ~ --- on groundwater quality?......................___Yes-X-~o 5. Will project significantly effect drainage flo\'l on adjacent sites? c.......... ./.......... ...:.-..-Yes-.lL.No 6. Will praject affect any threatened or endangered plant or animal species?..........___Yes-X-No 7. Will project result in a major adverse effect on air quality?..............................___Yes-X-N6 8. Will project have a major effect on visual character of the community or scenic views ar vistas known to be importont to the community? Yes X No 9. Will project adversely impact ony site or --- structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance or any site designated as a critical environmental area X by a local agency?......,........................-......... Yes No 10. Will project have a major effect on existing --- --- or future recreational opportunities?........ Yes X No 11. Will project result in major traffic problems --- or cause a major effect ta existing transportation system~?...................... 12. Will project regularly couse objectionable od~rs, noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturbance as a result af the project's operation?................................... Yes X No 13. Will project have any impact on public health --- or sa f e t y? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ___ Yes -X- No 14. Will project affect the existing community by directly causing 0 growth in permanent population of more than 5 percent over a one year period or have a major negative effect on the charaCter of the community or neighborhood? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15. Is there public controversy concerning the PREPARER'S SIG:::~:ct?....... --.............~;...___YeS~NO INo Yes X No --- --- Yes X No REPRESENTING DATE 9/10/82 ...' .' -r' .1 -.J- { "I" 1:1. . ----,-,-- :::;::....:;::!:::T ;":CF:; _J:....:.:~: ~ C_ , ',AiL ''.~U';:~,'iCE >.';~':' ~:E -";','"::::':=:- i'Jf F:" ;:d::.::~:::::".,l ,.:- _-n> _ :,-,.",:;: PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE I' 1 Bertha Kurczewski Depot Lane Cutchogue l'lY 11935 : ii'" ;-'u, :: ~o ']' -Q~'~ ~C' ~~;: _[.75~-_2li \ ..n~' 1"1 i ,;~;2~H~;:~:;,- ~~\=---; i, I. '- ~ ~, ",d,.V',,,"' I ~'\ Inc ,~ ~ ~', .,' :~" -,;;,~ l' - -----;1 : : . : ~ ~ ~ ~"~~: ~ ~~'~~r-~ ,j I I ~ ~ ~ - .:W") II'" '" l~1.:~~~ I ,\ i\ f j -' ~. iZ . .~;i:'. ~.1 "~,;"'",,\l '1 ,::l 0 % 0-/ [\ ~! ~ ~~.~~~.~~:,~ ,.:T~\ 1 ,11 i',t co:: '. '0 ...,~ '-f' - ,-v 1\ ":. '.. .". - - ~., ~. , .' ~ 1 TOTAL P~"D FEES S '? \\~ ~ pc-;;4"~:':~ \1 ~ t,,' ";-;-'~)\ ~I :'-:..~!)Ii. & wf : '- - !"".- ~~-:.J1' ~-=-;2f_---=_. ~_.___~___l Roman Catholic Church of the Sacred Heart ADDRESS Depot Lane, Cutchogue NY 11935 Cutchogue NY 11935 New Suffolk Lane, Cutchogue NY 11935 Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue NY 11935 c/o Bart J. Piscitello 2 Feeks Lane, Locust Valley NY 11560 1399 Little Whaleneck Rd North Merrick NY 11566 2490 Highland Road, Cutchogue NY 11935 215-14 43rd Avenue, Bayside NY 11361 P. O. Box 336, Cutchogue NY 11935 22 Dickenson Avenue East Northport NY 11731 P.O. Box 736, Highland Rd. Cutchogue NY 11935 Leisure Greens, Inc. Town of Southold Charles J. Zahra & wf Cutchogue NY 11935 Main Road, Box 786, Cutchogue NY 11935 Southold NY 11971 Box 1137, 1215 Pike St. Mattituck NY 11952 STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: ss,: . residing at Mattituck NY . being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 4th day of October ,19 82 ,deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the reverse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the cur- rent assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United" States Post Office at Cutchoque ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (l<Dgismc~ mail. JANE FLATLEY Sworn to me this 4th day of "october ,19 H~ / $~ ,/I ~/"''?c< c: -~"'- L'L~, " / :Jane Flatley (I RICHAnD J. ~RON Notary Public, State of New 'I.)!"). No. 52-1"351280 . SufFo:k Ca',' " Commission Exp:res ~~a!":':l?" 1 'J'f ,- ~ " . . TOWN BOARD. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of RICHARD J. CRON et aI, to the Town Board of the Town of South old. NOTICE TO: BERTHA KURCZEWSKI Depot Lane Cutchogue NY 11935 FRANK MACHINCHICK EST. Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 WILLIAM M. BEEBE New Suffolk Lane Cutchogue NY 11935 LONG ISLAND VINEYARDS INC. Alvahs Lane Cutchogue NY 11935 75 Highland Rd. Corp. c/o Bart J. piscitello 2 Feeks Lane Locust Valley NY 11560 FRANCIS J. DIVINEY & wf 1399 Little Whaleneck Road North Merrick NY 11566 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of South old to request a chanqe of zone. 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: Northerl side of Schoolhouse Road, Cutchogue, New York, shown on Suffolk County Tax r.1ap as Dist. 1000, Sec. 102, Block Lot 33.1 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: "A" Residential-Aqricultural District 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone district classification: "M" Liqht Multiple Residence District 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the South old Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of South old and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to ap- pear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: October 4, 1982 Richard J. Cron et al Petitioner Post Office Address: M~in Rnad - Box 953 Cutchogue NY 11935 . . .-- \ \ \\ \ .\ 1 :. ; ~ = SCALE': BOO'../. r .. z , \ \ \ \ PI2E:(Vf ISES \ \ r " z '" / I / /" C"O 4-9$ r4 J--~\ Creek . . . . "- ~, ''''''-'-, ,...... .... ", - " MAF -r:) AC.'=or\'1P,~f'J'./ AP{:."!L/2......t--:tr:O!,J Foe CHAN<3E= u-: ~-::.;;--.~(.: FCOM '~ T.:.:.:;v1' r~r:. " Cr.'- .---- ,- , , "-1 -'[~ -, r'-~- _.--' .,:::.._)~----- .' '''''1, AT CUTe: HOSUE -OWN r-,r- CC;UTHr' r\ "1 'v' . ~- ".~. UL_L-.'.. ". , .. " I "-:< / \ -"rr r-r-'T '.-~,I-.-'-/I,' :;::, ( .....~_ ..:::: - :,--,,1.;;.... . r-. .----- ..__-__:r-'~.-..r.".~.-~., -.-":.. ---" \ " "- II _1 V\,'rct:"lfon' . .., ;\; 'r ","". .E:r.1i<-k". .' .::.\,d,.,.~ ; ,...,...., ~-. .';;.....J_ '..~ .' '" '(;' :"'1';:c:c:,:,.-:-~'t"'! bld.q I ~~ vV f'A...'"'1X-h,':'- __' _ ~ [ ::::- f': ~. ! ;-;..' -:---.,. ,..---.:,='''''- .,' . oE-_ .~.~ , ~~ "A" :.i..'":""fl~, ex,-,c;F:+ et::-' htd::;trfe:::J. I 1\) .:> ..--' .-,,:: -,.-. ~'. ~ ;' ,:l <<......- ,.' , ... ~ 'H:..-:. .~..'X-:!y,d H,~~l.t-+ ;:.1. .,zoll:; Coun+" -r:...x Map Des;q"cr+iort: ~)." . .; 0;5+. /000, See+' I02,B/k:.I, !=tls.tO,2/ #::0. /" 3';' 97 ____-L_ JlNAUTHORILtO ALTi-a....TlON 01 ADDITIon 10 THIS ~u::.vn IS A VIOLATION Of JECTION nC9 OF THE'N~W YORK STAn lDUCATION LAW. J:OPlES OF nus SUitVEY MAP NOT RAtING JHE LAND St,;;:VfYO/i.'S INI([O SEAl OR. JMlC)5SEo S~AL SHAll NOT BE CONSIDEUD to IE A VALID TilUt copy, (WARAN1US INO'O, HO HEREON SHAlL RUN j:l'HLY TO TH~ Pf.:SC.:l fOR WHOM THE SURVE~ ,S PlB"AlEO. At~D 0:-. HIS alHALF TO THE 1ITU COMPANY, .:iOVfRNH.C:H"L AGENCy.......' LENDING tN$TlTUTlON LlSHO H~il.fON. AND to TH! ASSIGNffS Of THE mu)ltofG INST, JUTIOH. GUARANTEES ....U NOT Tl....NSH~ 10. !Q ADDfOOtCAL ItUTlTUfION'i (':Itr ~lHl"I' QW!iIso Mapped Sep+.ZI, 1982 12oc::>EI2JCIC VANTUYL, p.(-:. i";;'. V.c- -r- __ ~ ___._._ _ __~ . _ _.___...#lr.l:o__ Licer7:.'$ed Lond """, 'nteI.J~ 6rcenporl New York I -'-- _ _.~ 0# ., . , i '. ~) , ~". L. . " C:.l \ Oi::tchu"\ ' \ \--.;,-::-A ~~':e~ \ \ .;;:J. '\, . , s!orz;nV;. \ '- "--c-' -.--, _.J \'- A. I.l~ iHa".,,,bt""'1 , 'irv'c(bffe"'f ~) r - '--;--- ......___- J I L.?- Q \ k:/0~ E. l BJ"ce I' .-- t !:)(.~'-rj.-~ ,NF- .- ,- E' 1C:U.--Cl'!r!W:3k:.; ..... .--'.- ------.-. '", '\ " 190/.44 ~ '.\ '/.." 1;' (\\ ~ N (\', . . O ,r- ~.~, tI . \!\ j 1 \"1;"", ~J '-~ . ' '\1'"" : L~ ~ I I'i ~ VlI ". 'S: - .....,.r-...<.1.......e' . ;:",;:; . .....'T~ '-' .,/ '.) ~.O -' \!t .''- , \ .1.-, .............~-- r\ ... "7'.,-y---or-,r'\-:2~.~r.~_: '1 ,~ l;~l"6'( "\ ...JJ L-_~ ' C . li.J. fer ?: c ~-r'~4'1r "E'() -.0.. . v-. - Woo. ~,;' J\ " . " -', , ~- , , ,.....-,-......,.-.-;... -:"~.~-~'--y-'"~_.~' \ ;' , :)1 O~ 'r l- ~ ~ I tJ) i ,':1) C '.- ::-:7=:.68 l) d ". . PGE:M/SE:2 If) ~, , l-; . . ". . ';'J u', !J~ f \ """",If:, ..~..:.::. ~'Ic.;C_0 N. '37~!'=-'30"W ~~ 'C. :s: o \" r..: 'i) ~ P ~, 4; ll) ~----- , ~maHl CcN+rolic. C (-IlJr~~l ; eo .-.--- T ----- _.J.... --- ,. --. -, '200~e:" I ,'I I N "' 0 1 3~~' /81 "2 1~~4 ! 3" ,I .. ~_____--d-:_._.______-J.- L -- ---- ,- - --. - - -.- l2O'-lO ----T ----- = -is ;Ig/tl--::-:---,/-T ,~_ IM~~: ~Ti3! y ,:,<.~_,l ~ I.. I!:I ._~ ::::. I 'T ~ II 10 iT I , -- .--- .....'. t. ~ ' , , 10 ::3 LAt'.Jr:" -., ~ - ,uU --- -- - - ~ : C!:~(.JWN " . . , '-_C~"',!L ~ ;) \~ _1 '1-. 'vv. .....-." 2. ::"!'" ~ - , ~! :L , ,<."'-- """'. ~ of +he .~"'- ( , ! 3"'- -----_.._-----~._- --_._~ , , - --~ .-----...j ----..-l- -- -'--~' -- I' 1: i. . ,/' ~~;,-~, -~u~ "..~:' 'J,.. "~' ..l~~". ; " . V'y'-~'" ~ ~..'l:._' 7I;~ '':' .---- ---:-~--h- _.) .J ~. ---- --- .---- --- --.-:""; --- -- --.- i -, ... ,-I .... - .\ . 'SO"= 5.98.:30 . =, \'-;"; .. ". '. r . ',', ,',' :'~'.- :~l:~~:.: ~~~~S~:. j' 'P'" ".:\ I i 28 ~ 2 2, ~ ,. '. -'--1-/ r GI-l D ~ : 1/. -\ 1!5 /8 ~. / --- -~-- --',..--- . - .~.4i."..o-,___ ,.".':.',;a..~;t.',:~,~;?,;.;;;:,.,:\",:.... i-.":":' ":;;" . ~-:";.Jrf;~;:;:'.'?:\'~',/: .'.' .,: .' . .1 ,::~if}l..~tl::~,,,. '\',-,.{.,.... -r."" .-,.-:r..,...., ;' .;~:r:~':jr~;r.~ A:.~~;?t~- ""', ;. ,. .J ~~~;~:'~.. 'I .~. 2~ .~s -.~.- ",- --~ ,._~ 'i 't"''''~''''"1'A;';-'~'f't'i'r-''''.'''''''''.':'! ~ !' ~t'~ , "Q, QI~~:I ~ n''<. ~Jl s ~t g~ ~ liil)' ~ wdl ~ <<J)Jl 'l' ~' f. " ....,.~~'>"- i' ~ , , .;-~ , ~;~ $; 1i ~' .J ~ .. I l: ;i /'llg I ct ~~11 ,~ ",,~;n , i ~~ ~~~ t ''''' " I. " '(',,:.~ -'; ~ fi 1~,1 tJ~ ~~ ~. f, d~~ ~; ~ ,I:: '1: ;!iii, ~ ~~,i: ! ~,.( ~ ~ - 11 . . - - ;h . . ."it;' *' ]" . , ' , I 1,( .< , ;({ ,,, ...1 L__ II!t . . -.,. - T . . - ,,'It! ", ./ .' To Q. u t. fro:ll the ~rese~t Jev.lop' 197d, ra~ 12, artt t ?l~~ or :he :O~ o~ ~cu~~J:d, 1 dl 2" ja~ej Septe te~ 14, now i years be di on th "Posltlve measures should be take~ to ass~re that lar.~ a~tcultural useage should re~aln in s~ch use tor as ~ar~ to come as posstble....Major r~sldential de.e:'pcent s~ould eeted to the south ot Route 25, and alo~~ a narrow s:rip north shore abutting :ong IsIL~d Sound." Ae, t e undersi~.ed, petition ~e Southald To~ 2oar~ to disapprove of a zoning ch ~ge trom resi~ential-agricultural to multiple housing tor "'seacroft", 47 aCEe tield just north ot. Cutchogue. CO:"l.sLter-ation or such ~ change r .s cOIL,~er to the present develo;ment plan. o .. _ _ . ._ _ .. ~ __ _ __._ ._ __ . _ .. _ _,. ?urth ~ore, we believe that these priwe a~lcult4ral l~ds are a ::-recLous, f nite resource and s~ould be ;:reserved as such. :;e call on ':he 3outhold 30arj to aid 1.... ~""~.J 7=-a~et"?J.~1,o~. 1. . :h )". JJ I </!JY} . .., CV... 2 . u.... o ,1: t' '-'" J. / . 'I ) ~ ,cL(~ c.::Lj~J' d ~... ..~"--~~ I)'''\~l I, V\~~\~('- r "J ~ '-;d._ { ......._.1.., . L "'. :.r-L...... ~ (~(/ 4. , o. d. M (/1 ~ Ct(.z;/~~ 7. ,L-c'-.... '-- /. / / ......'. ': L <-L...~LI't..L,.. _'..L ,:.......... ~ . ._~.,Lt/v _~~KA- .; t'o. l2 ( .J. 4.. 5. 6. ,. . . . . To q\i ~, tres the a:rl".-.e iJfv,:o;lre:!t <'ia.." ot .h. .or.: ot Scu ~ho:d, da~ej Se;~e ~e~ 14, 1978, p~ 12, articl. 1 ~ 2, "Posltiy, measure. should b. ta~en to aS3~r. that land ag:-icult~l usugt should re:!a.!.n 1n s'~ch ,"s. tor u ::....."'.;f to COQe as Possl~l.....M.jor residential develo;Qent s~ould ect.d to the south ot Rout. 25, and alor~ a narro* strip north shore a~uttln& :or~ Isla..~d 3o~d." now i year. b. dl on th ~e. t · undersigned, petition The Soutnold Town ooard to dlsap~rove of a z:ning en ~e trom residential-agricultural to multiple housi~g for "Seacroft", 47 acre field just north or. Cutchog'Je. Constderation of sr~ch - !l..c}'~a.~g~ .r'-'Es cOI~,~e_r. ~~ ~~_~iE.~sent d_e".e~o;<>.ent pla.n._ _ _.. :urthe ~ore, we believe thae these pri=e agr.!.cultl~al l~d~ are a .;-rec to'lS, f1 1 te resource and should be ;r-esar'"ej a.3 such. ;ie call on ':',e . 30ar j to a1 0.... 783 ;" , .. '. 'l 7J'3 (?nL::P,,~.:u,L 7-;2; ~~~ra'7' 6kL~ ~,' \ ~ , I 12-/- f'ri C.7-0-'i-. ""____ f?"l1.f' r=' 1/- &0... 55'" C.,~L~".\i€' /"''1 A I"")( oL ' Z, ~ -, --'--- J. , ;. , .' J. '..; r--".../ /, Ie '. . (}~ S ~ ; Ql~C~ ~ 35- //9-3 s- /)l;I //17 ( I) .5,C; " , . . To quote froM the present Development ja~e~ Se;te~ter 1~, 1978, page 12, article an at 7he Town or 3out~o:d, i: 2, "Positive measures should be taken to assure that l~~d now in agricultural useage should remain in such use tor as mar~ years to come as possible....Major residential development should be directed to the south at Route 25, and along a narrow strip on the north shore abutting :ong Isl~~d Sound," je, the undersigned, petition The Southold Town Board to disapprove or a zoning change from residential-agricultural to multiple housing ror "Seacraft", a 47acE.~ field just north ot. Cutchogue. Consideration or suc!'! a..~h.ar.~~ r'~s COI~:.::~~_~~ tl!~ present d_ev=~ofment plan... __. 2urthe~ore, we believe that these prime agricult~ral l~~d3 are a ::.!"ec :,ous, fihi te resource and should be ;:reserved as such. ;;e ca.fl cn :'''1.e 3outhold ':'own 3oa=-j to aid l.1I"'l 't'"':.1 ~t"'e3et'"~!:ltiJ!":.. ,-. -K~rd~~2A;; "~~;i:'~-W1) J. I' '///./ c /7/, J /-<-i.-C"c..._/'.'; . -," T - .: t t.. ..- l. _ '- . ~!.~. ), -~.-{ '"F~-~li:ti p ; ~ 'e<.--l ~ \ _.~~_.._- m~ Ih ~~ ~ I . (In""; (<.\ ,~ - ~/J ~u D~ f-C :1 -r-: 8 . . ~ ) c. ',,17/ 7 (~I!.J... t ~. S.... ~rA.~ J~Lti cTh~(.~ f ~ '" o. 1. 2. J. .- " ~(~~/;e~ ~ -' . \ . . " ,To quote fro~ the pre!.~t Dev'lo;cte~t ?lan of r'~. :Oor.'! ot ~C1J~ho:d. da~d Se;;te:!':er 1~. 1970, Pa&" 12, article 1 & 2. " .Poslti~. =eas~.. should b. taken to ass~r. that lar.d now in .~lcultu:al usea~ should r.~atn in such use for as :!~~ year. to co=e as pOsslbl.....M.Jor residential d.ve:o~cent should b. directed to the south or Rout. 25. &r,d a10~ a narro. strip on the north short abutting :.o~ Isla::d 30141d.. ~e. the ur.dersi~ed. petition The Southold Town aoard to disapprove of a z:ning chang. rro= resIdential-agricultural to multiple housing for "Sea:roft". a 47 acre field just north of, Cutchcl"Je. Consijeration of s~ch - ;J."c,l'~ar,~!r~s co...,:.e_r. ~~ theiE.~sent d.eV,t~o;c;e:1.t plan._ _.. :urthe~ore. we believe that these pri=e agri~ultural lar,d~ are a ;,rec ious. fin! te resource a:ld should be ;:reserved a3 :::uch. ;je call on ':''le 3ou~~old !o~ =c~d to aId i" t~~~ ;:-a3e:-".':l ': 1 ~~. t. ICe> j:,. -r.--~~..y- S"u-lke ;~_ /J. .<../ /. ~ . <.A U' ~-?~.~ -Y~ v // ~7 ~ . ~-'~'.-( .' ""'"A' /-::1:-~ ttk L '1r-- tv~.w ~ Vfi:; I k V !J 9 J;f; c& l.-7~ ~, ~-t~CcZ. , "?2!/-' / I r 71 '____ 1/ (, {t' /. I/"! ~/ !UA.v)J'r(} it'; I 'l b II ' / e..,~_'C-/,-<--<- 'V.Y,' () I ~fV I. '. '. ~t;r '~ . /~II't1'1/ (It.~ J. '. '. \\C\ ~ /) L II j..)- I . Q~ ~tA'4. / ai:~~ ~J.{~,j (~<.L ( .... /' .. f " -'_ '3";;- --1l . /c .../ ( f.-'-~t-t': ~ J/ (c:}t1.h,. ),. I . . ,To ~~ott fro~ tht ~rtse~t Jevtlo;eent ?14~ of .he town ot Sou~ho:d, da~e~ Se;te::l':er 14. 1978. pa~ 12, article 1 & 2," "Positive ='as~e. should be ta~en to aSSurt that lar.d now In .~icult~l use~~ should re::lain in such use for as ::lar~ year. to comt .s POssibl.....M.Jor residentIal de~e:o;ment s~ould be directed to the south of Routt 25, ~~d alor~ a narro_ strIp on tht north short abutti"6 :0"6 IslL~d 3ound." ~e. tht undersl~ed, petition The Southold Town Board to dlsap~rova ot a ~oning change from resIdential-agricultural to multiple houslr~ tor "Seacroft", a 47 acE..' field just nortl:l or. Cutchog'.le. Co~s:..:ie:'atlon ot S'.lCh a._c}'ca.r:~~J'-'!ls cO'l.~?~_r_ ~~ ~~_!.cesent d_e".e~o;-m-=nt Pu..'1,_. _._ Furthe~ore, we believe that these prl=e asr:'cu!~l~al l~,d~ ~re a ;-rec Lou!, fini te resource a:td should be ;resarvei a3 :;ucn. ;;03 Cal 1 on '::''le 3ou'=~old To~ 3ca.:.j to aid t" t"";".:; 7:-aaer?J. ':l~~. I " . 307 1'1:1 ~ tSJ :21~ ~ c.. t? I. 'l (~-~. , I --::-lA '" /:> JIi,' ~ '. . ~t..t-, l ~t'i<-eJIu...- 7~ ~ . r-^-- ~"Y.....J 2'2>?~ <LV' t2..../~_ ~~~/ -~~._.U, "''' e c? :2? '" : ~~-:t7 ' J d' W -:g.L2,>r U. Q . Lhu:: _ ...._~ _Jivt.,) -- ~ ~ 7ld.:id.--- d r~ J. /~. . ,. , 1- 7 II Ic?O /.Z :::> __ . . . , ...J-!/--:{' .j~ ~ I J.{ I. ~ ...v ; . 0 ,0 C vie hc)"~~ "\r~ S~ ~ ~'-'-'.... (J, 7;;- t.~~. /1 ~< \\ 'It o. 13 Cy I C. 3 c.. . . ..To quote troll! the prese:-:t .:lev.lo t ?la.'l ot ~he Tor.: or;::( ~.o::I, da~ej Se;te:::ter 14, 1978, pag'! 12, art, ! 1 &. 2, "Positive llIeasures should be take~ to assure that l~.d new in a~lcultural useage should re~ain i~ such use tor as ~ar~ years to cOllie as poselble....Major reslde~tial developoent should be directed to the south or Route 25. &r.d alo~~ a narro_ strip on the north shore abutting :ong Island 3ound." ~e, the undersi~.ed, petition rhe Southold Town Board to disapprove ot a z:ning char~e trolll residential-agricultural to multiple housing tor "Se3.crott", ,a 47 acre tield just north o( Cutchog'.le. Co::sLieration ot s'.lch - il.,c.h.ar.i;J ru!-s cO't..,~er. ~':.... th~_ present d_eve~opa:.en t plan. _ _... :urthe~ore, we believe that these pri:::e agricultl~a1 13.nds are a ;:'rec lous, tini te resource and should be ;:-esarvad a3 :::uch. ;;e cali on ':'le '0I.,l""01d 'l'0'N!" no~~d to a'd ; ~ ~'" - ~-~-e""1 '"1' ,~ .... ..... .... .:J a...- _ ~ .. ~ ..".....,~. ... . _.. ....... ~-lIvj1-a~ rp~"J tf^. (u-iikfi,~ /" 0 2. ~r:d;~,--,.tio ~"J.,).u.. fJJ I Q' -----r /1 ~ ' / J. /:I;('ftl;,:V'j iIIal/t- . ~v~~ ,(-JZ' ,. I :: :i1Et~'f{j~ /,"~ ll)/~~ n.J. f ... .. .;;, ~r:::~ ~d~ __..__ 1".0 B<H ~ C u -\<.k~" N. Y . I ~\S T~_ ReA. Sl)L~s-t&. ny.ll1 7'a . .__ <t I'L/Yf u-",,-,; 3. f71~ i LJL-,:. .~ ::. \.JJ 1\\Ic..V~~L0~_S,^a....? ~Q'-\.R~~ V"\ -~ - (JhE;-IF~ 1. 2. ht~ d'..Hf! t. I) ""'- ~ ':.".2 \~\..~ J. +. ). ,. (80 'J. 3....-3 .L:....t lY!....,y...; /.l- \j . I Li.3 ' . . ~o q~ote fro~ the prese~t Jevelop~ent ?lan of ~he rown o~ ~outho:d. da ted 3e; te::1::er 14. 1978. page 12. article 1 &: 2. " "Positive measures should be taken to assure that land now in agricultural useage should remain in such use for as car~ years to come as Possible....MaJor residential developcent should be directed to the south of Route 25. and along a ~arrow strip on the north shore abutting Long Isl~~d Sound." Ne. the ~~dersigned. petition rhe Southold Town Eoard to disapprove of " a zoning change from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "Seacroft". a 47 aCE~ field just north of. Cutchogue. CO:1side:"ation of such !l .c:.ha:-.g.e r'~ns cQuz!ter_ t.?_ th~ present d_e~elo.t=ment ;:l.an,. ?urthe~ore. we believe that these prime agricultural l~~jq are a ~:"ecious, finite resource and s~ould be ;:rese:"ve1 as such, ;;e call on ~he Southold Town 30ard to aid i~ t~~3 :reser'l~tior.. 'J, .- d~0-\ ~~~~AL c...1 c- L dk/?/:: Cd r) ~ w7~~ >0'-' H :44L CCA7C.#cy4 (;:- ~TI-rv0:- '7 1.1~ C ~~L /7, If. ~/u HOt-I:{ I" k U.y ~.u_/,,'f?f~ ~c/ '. , 1. --..- ?'. ~ 3. . ". 1-V l!1. ~7 f<:# ;'111 I I :SluJ n . _ tf~~J.~ /~~ . . . , To q1Jo~e frolll the fresent iJevelo;:a:ent ?lan of ~he :'owr. of ja~ed 3e;:te::J':e:- 14. 1978, pag'! 12. article 1 <2 2. > "Positive lIleasures should be taken to aSS1J~e that land new in agricultural useage should remain in such use for as many years to come as pOssible....Major re~idential develof~ent should te directed to the south of Route 25. and along a narrow strip on the north shore abutting :'ong Island 301..l.":d." ::-~,) :'1. 1. i- 1/; ~ /i W~~. ~!/'...Qi - """ ~~~~~ ~.Q ..--' ~-=-- d ...-;--- S .., ::.Jfdt,,~ ~u.:- II ;. at t ?"-cv rt b ___ '. f. {c~~~.__._.._______ o".aiL.;. ~~ 1 / ",. /I . I _.:......MUU.,/ ~-(...... .~1 jvIVCt<-t.^- 2. /:\ L~'l . \\'-~~. -:::?---. e-..~ _C;J d\.zQ , .' , I Ii / J, (' ~~~e<:ve " ~/7 Pi. {1V Te/lo.., Oc. .4--< 'j/l nJ>" -s- !t~'-'2A.~a< ~_. \ ,^,~jlk ~~ 01(~k , '11. Lj.. . '0 7UJ " ~ " ~ ~ j:'./ uJ 5 7' ~ . -- '. -' , iILc;L<-.>\ \ ~ LI..-(..J<.'-z, r:- ! .Jc/J<-Z )A;,,,,~ <-- J. ~~::k .~ L - J. l\, _ ''-'1"''l...Lv C" --.~ ~ \....( t- t-~. , -" . . To quo~e from the present Jevel 1ated Se;temte~ 14. 1978. fage 12. ar nt 21an ot The Town at Southo:d, ..e 1 &: 2. "Positive measures should be taken to assure that l~~d now in agricultural useage should remain in such use tor as many years to come as possible....Major residential development should be directed to the south ot Route 25. and along a narrow strip on the north shore abutting :'ong Island 30'md." ~~e. tl'.e undersigned. petition The Southold Town Board to disapprove ot a z~ning ch~~ge from residential-agricuLtural to multiple housing for ";;eacraft", a 47 ac..r~ field just north of Cutchog".Je. Consideration at su~'1 _. fl.c.h_a.~~e r'..u!ls co...,ter. t':. th~ present d_evelapment plan.. ~urthe~ore. we believe that these pri=e agrlcult~ral l~~ds are a ;reclous, finite resource and should be ~reserved a3 such. ~e c~ll on 7he SO'lttold To''''!''. goar.:! to aid t.. t'-:: ~t'eser'.'J. ';ion. ,6) r,. / , / "... 0 y. ,- /""-'--k'r-J..j~j(' /;"'/ue.. <--..--- .. //. J, - T'rniff'.'I iF(V/l{ (l?:> N:"'R.~ . (;). 2./ /7~ C . . .. f). 0 1. , , 93,,) . 1/9$":' .. ). +. et:.c8G- pRo 5. w. Ulk.6" ;2.~ ,....., .. v>.tflK.kj(.i)~_ 6. .,. . . ,To ~l.lote frolA the present iJevel:Jplu 'Ian or 1'he Town ot Scut!'lol.d, dated Se;te~~er 14, 197a, pa~ 12, artlcl~ & 2" "?ositiv. ~eas'Jres should be t~e~ to assure that l~~d now in agricultural useag. should re~ain in such use tor as ~~~ years to com. as POssibl.....Major residential development should b. dlrected to the south of Route 25. anei along a narrow strip on the north shore abutting :ong Isl~~ei 5o~~ei." , Ae, the undersl~ed, petition The Southolei Town 30arei to eilsap~rove of a zoning chan6e from resieiential-agricultural to multiple housing for "Sea.:rott", a 47 ac~~ fielei just north or. Cutchog1.H!. CO:'lsijeration ot su:h ?-..C.h.ar"6_e r'.l~s cO'!."1?e:,. t~ th~_present <1.eve~o~ent pLan._ __. Purthe~ore, we believe that these ori~e asr~cultl~al l~~ds are a . . :;rec L':Jus, fin1 te resou::ce a:lei should be pt'eserved a3 such. ;ie cill on '::''le 3olJtr.old To-m 3oa!"d to aId ~" t~:J '7ra~.e!,""'.J.tio~. .1t"<..AlYlrl't-l~OFF- 1..N(:)1 mAIN Nc"W -)lAf-'HlLK I\:Y.llqS," 1.f} 7h-1 );..I/, r:,c /1I.D J- J l/f/r .tl:lc.J ,-<;;'--;.:co~ yv' / y'17 'T') ~ I'~TT 2. "o/v i)...:iI2J2'CII (;t; c'ST C.c'cIk Av E C vTCI-IOC-tJ (;- , ('(lAIN J. AL)6-aA 11/.1"L[~ tJ"c-W SlIr,Co,-i<... /17ft. , VKI<./ Utitlia.l{( 11'1~S BOl( 'j:r ~ 2/d~ -/f4~----~e' //,7)"'- ~ 'iT 5 I.lO ~~I I I C4"JU1CX,....6' _ ~ '2. C L~ . a 't",fc ~ I/'~, Y<- \ ,.z.......o L..... 7. ) "S, t...P.. OWS)~1 -..-/--->P€QW'tfol ~ .' C.4"T(Jt~l.lE "",L;~,. ';;7 a .,. (-LL-r.c ft-". b ~ " . J. s~ (Q.. 4! ~J ~vG:~ / I Cf.ij' "j:-::'_ 10 ru-",,..,..~~ ~Q) /" /.. ml\IN ~l>. t4:rJ:~~U~ ,\ " h .1. .2. 5. - ~lft{_./ Nt) R. LlNCIIE'R ~lJr A AU\l.e-1\ I2P . 7"'" ~. <. I - Ii ~. r+.- . n. , :I. .~ . Q~:!"~ . I . . To quote f~o= the p~esent uevelop~ iated Se;te~te~ 14, 1978, ~ag~ 12, artic ?lan or :he 70Wi. or 1 &. 2, th~~:1, "pos i. ti ve measures should be taken to ass'..re that land now in agrlcultural useage should remain in such use for as mar~ years to come as possible....Major residential development'should te directed to the south of Route 25, and alon~ a nar~ow strip on the no~th sho~e abutting :'ong Isla.nd 3ound." de, the unde~signed, petition The Southold Town Board to disapprove of . a zoning change from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "5eacroft", a 47 acr~ field just no~th of Cutchogue. Consideration of suc~ _ il..~h_ar.~~ r~s COIL"l:;er_ t~ th~ present d~velo<,lIlr::1t plan.. :urthermore, we believe that these prime agrlcul~u~al l~nds are a ~:'eclous. finite resource and should be prese:-ved as .::uc~. ',.e call or. :''1e -c 3out~old 70wn 30ard to aid ;" -z......./(.(/";>KI ~ ":''''':.~ .:Le.ser'.':l ~i.;:-.. I .. (} ~d,_ - ~ . I ( u- J. "-~~nv fi ~.d/mJ '):1<.7 '.1v1O:J1~~~h~~ , 11 t:o R.oTtl'f 1'+ . M.ll R:>E l. ~ Il nU'Vlg !..17..lA R. f'IW'J'" ~ij:~ftt:;;j: .~ ~~_:N' l.. I,,--. B~", P.. 2? IS J. I, ~1~TI4- ;>L. C 1A"c..HOlftU~ I, lo!.INI" I Y?~_ L~ '7:;:/;t:i~ ---- - ._- P,*,CONll.. I A. '. ---....- < .. - ,. {) ow s...f f)ll'l/ , I iu u<. //7 a.t(. f u l.-0 0. I\\I(.nGH.......~ D . t.. It,,: I ~, . . To qyote t~o~ the present O.ve:~;~{ datej Se;te~~e~ 14. 1978. p~ 12, artie" ~l~~ ot !he !o~ or ~cutho:d, 1 &. 2, "Posltive =.as~ee should b, t.~e~ to ass.~. that lar.~ new 1~ .~leultur.l usea&, should r.~.ln In such us. tor as ~~~ year. to come as POssibl.....MaJor res11ential de~elo;~ent stould be directed to the south ot Route 25, L~d a1o~~ a ~ar~ow strip on the north sho~. abuttin& :ong IslL~~ So'~d." de, the ur.de~sl~.ed, petition The Southold Town Soard to dlsa;pro~e ot a toning change tro= resIdential-agricultural to ~ultlpl. housl~g for "Seacroft", a 47 acre tield just nortJ:L ot. Cutchog-.le. Co~st.je~atlon ot such - !l__e}':.an6~.r~s cO'L,~.eF. ~~ ~~!pr~sent d_ev_e~o;~,=nt plan._ _._ Purthe~ore. we belle~e that these pri=e a~lcult'.lral l~~~s are a ;~ecLol.ls, finite resource and should be ;reser....e:i a3 :::ucn. ii. call on ~'e \ 3out!-.01d To'...r,. 3ea.:d to aid i.. !;"'13 :::'a5e~'!:Ltio~. ~---Do~'.N &~t' D ~ \.,~'I{)\L~~&1UV ') ~~. ,:\\), ~~,;e'-'-\fA . ~C.5T~I"\I...\~ ~i>/ I. ~ r/d4 (1/!aJ.~~,,4Y_ - ~~ r.~O~~d ~~&-/ V~ '-::' 7~4,'>\ ,,,""., "'-"'IKoLt> N 'L/~ <t-r e .- .........T~_ L, :::/ C E L(./-A~ n L 1'\'1 '\' tc,.-r~), 1'___ 6 y~, ~J~__\7LS loNr~LI2~8<. f\R. Sou '- N.lf o ~"~qcu(. ~.7'4' .~~ d ~_--L // d~ a... ( 6../)!, "I'v~' <: - PI'\-'1LLIS c..AI~L..I'\1JCl f1=c...oNlc.. ~ .c; d ~'euNI<': G ~..,.c...>t()(..,....<:r 'AJ<./ .~ 1 mt\TTI"TU<"f~Y. @ 7/1~' . u '? f'~c:.oN I f -I? C 0-<-. C. O~le"fT INU/I'\N Neue. LA. '. o d ""n~::" ~ . ~~,. L;-. mrt~lc"-' /J~ r . . To quote fro~ the present Jevelof~ent ?lan of .ne To~ of ~cutho:d, datej Se;te:~er 14, 1978, pag~ 12, article 1 & 2, 0 "?ositive meas~es should be taken to aS3~r. that lar.d new in agricultural useage should re~ain in s~ch us. tor as ~any years ,to come as pOssible....MaJor residential develofment should be di~ected to the south ot Route 25, and along a narrow strip on the north shore abutting Lo~~ IsIL~d 3ound.- ;<le, the unde:-stgned, petition The SO'.Ithold Town Eoard to disappro"e of a zoning change trom residential-agricultural to multiple housing for ".5eacrott", ~ 47 ac..;:.e field just north ot. Cutchog'.Ie. Consideration ot such _ :J. .c_h_ar.6~ r~s cOII.:~e_:- _ t~ th.~.Hpresen t d_eve~of{llen t plan. _ _.. ?urtheir::lore, .lte believe that these ori:::.e agricul t'.lral la..~ds are a . . , ::,r-ec~ous, finite resou:-ce and sho,uld be ;>reser'ved as such. ",ie call on :''te 3olJthold To~ 'Soard to aid ~,.., 't'""13' ~r"e3.er"'l:L :1::-:.. 1. L7,.., ~.- --- 2. c.. ~-cN fOfl.,-r . J; - , 5. 171ZJ ~~ 13~. ~':> -<.. -i-T1~-naJ, ~"l: &3 -e' " 3D! t(,~7t:Jt- A()"f ulL f . ~ . l " ~\I (('~ ~~.1!, 't~\~lF 0~?(c)~L~D ~. ci,-\:)<::~\"'" il ~JfC 1 ~i ~ ] 2 < -. f T~~$~ -, ,. " p~ ~~ - " " (2,. ~~~ I) ~J/y ..)1-11 J ciA-- , (] "--~ ~(; 9 t<.- ~ .0 u .(),1TJ~~ ~.Q rt'\~,..... 2.~ j~ 11 " . . To quote f~o= the p~esent Jevelap~ent ?l~~ of .he .o~ of Southo:d, datej Se;t~=:e~ 14, 1975. pa~ 12. article 1 & 2" "?ositive Measures should be taken to ass~re that land now in agricultural useage should ~eoain in such use tor as o~~ years to OOMe as pOssible....Major restdential developcent should be di~eoted to the south of Route 25, and alo~~ a nar~ow st~ip on the no~th shore abutting :ong Island 301~d." ~"e. tile unde:-s igned, petition The 5outhold Town 30ard to disapprove of a zoning ch~~ge from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "Seacraft", ia 47 ac~.e field just north of, Cutchogue. C0:1s1Jeration ot such _ ~,.c.~an~,! r',,~,s cOII.;':er. t~ th~ present d.evelop;::e:-.t ~lan.__ _.' :urth~~ore, we believe that these pri~e a~lcultl~al l~Js are a ~r-ec ~ous, dni te resour-ce a:1d should be (lresarvad as such. :ie C~l on ~'te 'o'ut"ol" "'0' 30a~d to a;d ;- ..",.. -~a-e""""J.'-- ~ ... 1.4...... _ _. ~...,I __.. .;:, ~. _ _ """.... 1lJ.... ~lUl GI to ~ ~o-c-f " t -.J7 Ji. ,.,,'NIt tel.,'!: )? ). ,/~"( tdiL:1. '. c-te.d}::"2 t!'J.(hC-"-t1.... ~,rl.. "t-:.i"lv{?""yJ,A~ +. L! ~\l~~t,~'" IL..... o~~ 1"4 ~ ,( ~(..I"'l~~."E.4.. ~'tb., '-'u(v."T.:1i........; ~~~t-t i;.~t~~,? ) L Lt. .'- :'Ll-,)L t..'--^-..J - 't-c LH ~ 5. \, t.. C~ '~-+LWJ ".~""' O~"'t~ 1. ",'-f A~"""__ " .oJ -'t.~. ~........ I " ~-' I- 7 :i Y , -.~~~. -' 11>'S' 00......." i)Q. _ ~ 73{.... .J;)~t{. cD~ U'7a4.;;: ~~ ~/y_ I v~ct{~ C,(j( /t/t Ilq~ '.':; \' ~. (I 1. 2. J. I -~ 5. ~ 5. 1J~ CJs:5 ~~_C~. 1"-1> NI '. );.~ f Irl/~?-:.J./- :z;f~L hdK./. (};z;-/ _~ ,~ 1/9j~ , I ~ , i' _~- . . ,To qyott tro= the present D.vt:o;~ datej Se~te=~e~ 14, 1978, p~ 12, art1e~ ?lan or rhe rown or South~:d, 1 & 2, , "Poelt1ve measure. should b. taken to aS3~re that lar.d now in agrleultYral useage should reQatn 1n sueh use ror as =L~~ yece to come as posslbl.." ,MaJor resIdential de',felo;ment s':ould be dIeeeted to the south or Route 25, and alo~~ a narro_ strip on the north shore abutting Song IslL~d Sound," 2 ~e, the ~~dersl~ed, petition ~e Southold Town Board to dlsap~rove ot a z:ning ehar~. trom residential-agricultural to multiple housing tor "Sea:rott",.. 47 ae~~ tield just north o( Cutehogue. Co~sldet'ation ot such - !l._e_h.ar'6~. r~s co...;~e_r_ ~9- t~_!c.~sent d_ev_e~o;-a:.ent plan,_. __. :urthepore, we believe that these pt"i::le a~lcultllI"al 1r.ds are a : rec :.ous. nhi te resource ar:d should be ..~reserved a3 such. ;;. caJ.l on ':''\e - I ~.~=~t~old TO~. Soard to aid t" ~~~~ ~t'e5erv~~i:~. , [. ., I I I .~ / ;" C , -, (J/..u J ~ It) I . "-i. rJ~ t'4J /W c..-'u -:-", , J , r:' " . U C- , 1 c -'I~l'J.....r:l.-lfJl-'-'..., rOfJt:k/[/[ (.J (dX)t?_ \1 v' /A J) /2. 3, Y ~.(~ L If./; Cu A (~^-- If -<- 1 0 IV 1 ) 4 ~!J ~~-=___ L:::6S \-J.t Q~ -? d . ..,J ;. .ftaifo~~kh l~ ~ If. .u. ~ <.p 6-.v~.., (II AI e \,' I f. <\~~ leI. . !J. ._~(~~ J. ,1:~N I "'<A~H..", ut.t'", l.vo <..lL 1. a~J: Ii ....... L d' c' ./ u ::a"...... /I! ~ ,e...c...C:"'6 ~C>. L u...l.t ~ . c....:......- K...^-. /7 ~ ........... /7 ) / to :..-/~ '::" ~ ). ~) A ~~~ .~ , L.2.-c-~t>""'- -..J." , w~~ p~ 13L/-Co~"7 ~~ 4u~ f- Ld-Uu , L"-l. ( V/(r!OCr/('" /:.r.//lr. (9 I ~~lL_ ~ f (l-) ll.4)";,,,,:/1;I...u ctv-l, I!yf-.. jj 'PJ-- J. ~' , '. , :....... i~~of(l.loV"''''' -"" . t.~ \ .... ...... - , "-~ '---- . 7J -i.L~-;~ L' -~ A l.~ , /...'~) A=>CJtl~'Ii:.F.7-~ . 1//. .:J{' t~ .or;-'" Aefvu....I~ :A-/nv~"t./ 1 ..;::{ b"''"IWI'"'T"Q '.II _ ___ Av. , " . '\ ,- i~ - r... "fJ-~ "-01. / "7/ . . To quote fr'02 ~a.e~ ~e-.--~e- 14 I",\,....~,..-...-. . the pr.se~t J.v.lop~.nt ?l~~ ot !he ro~ or Scutho~d. 1975, p~ 12, article 1 & 2, ~ ~~ .Positivl measure. should b. taken to aSSure tha~ lar.~ now in agricultural useai' should re~ain in such use tor as ~~~ year. to come as PossLbl.....MaJor residential develo~~ent should be directed to the south of Rou~e 25. ~~d alon6 a narro. strip on the north short abutting :ong rslL~d 30und." ~e, the undersi~ed, petition The Southold To~ 30ard to disapprove of a z~nlng char~e from residential-agricultural to multiple housir~ tor "3eacrort.~. 47 acre field just north or. Cutchog'..le. Consideration of s:.:.ch - ~..cJ"~ar..g!r s CO'L~~~_r_ ~~ t~_~present d_e~e~o;{ll~nt plan._ _._ :urthe~ore, we believe tr4t these pri=e agr~~ultl..lral 13:.~~ are a ;-recLous. fi~ite resource and should be ;r-eset"ved as zuch. ;;8 call on ~'1e , 3out~old To' . 3oa:d to aid l" t"l~ .::rese!"'!J. tior:. L /)e; j 2-. !. " . ) , l, , ., I. r;) J88-g.l"lj /174'-1 . ~~V ~(,M~ '--~ Lj17-ol.oc " ; r,,-,; It r I i?>Ll - '1 :? I . . To quote f~o~ the present Jevelop~ent ?lan of 7he Town of SOuthold. 1ated Septe~be~ 14. 1978, page 12. article 1 & 2, "Positive measures should be taken to assu~e that land now in a~lc1~tural useage should re~aln in such use for as =any years ito come as possible... .Major residential development sl".ould be dir~cted to the south of aoute 25. and along a narrow strip on the' no~th shore abutting :'ong Isla..'''ld Sound." ;~e. the undersigned. petition The Southold Town Board to disap;lC'ove of a z~ning chapge from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "SeacroftR, , 47 ac_r~ field just north of Cutchogue. Consideration of su;;:>t ~ change r~nls celL:ter to the present develo;ment plan. - . .. - -2~rth'epore; w-~-belie~..~that the~e prioe agr 1;;: ul t'~r';:-l'l3.njS are a. ::-~'ec LOIJs. fi i te resource and should be ;reserved as :::uch. :ie ca:11 0:'1 :''le 301.lt:--.old To' . 30ard to aid l"" 't"":'.1 _~re3e4'.'a~io!':. -= 1. 7 3ej- ~ 734-$/9;;" )4., 110'5-3 )1. , ~ ;C.--_.- }J. (;. 7lo~- I I ,fa ./rH,,~ # y ___ 1. 2. J. ~ . i. ,. " ____J - ~si ( If' cf {',delo.,. (< ~ JJ L {\}{W s... !.4n<,. a...,e.. . ~)J. Ny 7.3~/- 5J0 1!;4 - (.,() (17 . Lv/>;-,,., 0- - I L-.upton 1/ A/I~ '-7/1.... (..IC. Po,',,\- mo.--It.\ucK " /l".)-. '.)..9&. - DI~~ 'l1ML<./,,0{ ).<.{, d.9'O-Q<{ "-' )J;/ I?>'-j - 5 ~ Ic~ Pt. '13</- 73(;3 . . 'To quote trom the ~r.sent Jevelo~~ent ?lan ot .he Town ot datej Se;:eo';e:- 14, 1978, ;a6" 12, article 1 & 2,0 "PositivI meas'.uoes should be taken to aSS'lrs that land new i~ agricultural usea61 Should reoaln in such use tor as OL~ years!to come as possible....~ajor residential develo;cent should be ditected to the south ot Route 25, ar.d along a narrow strip on th. north shore abutting Long Isl~~d Sound." .tho:'d. Ae, the undersigned, petition The Southold Town Board to disapprove ot a zonlng change trom residential-agricultural to multiple housing tor ".5eacrOft"~ 47 acre field just north of. Cutchog'..le. Conslde:-ation of such a..c-",a.r.6.!! r' s cOI~,:e_r_ ~~ t":~pre5ent d_e~;!a;-ment plan._ _._ :urthe~ore, we oelieve that these prl:e a~ieult~al l~~ds are a ::or-ec lO'lS, fln1 te resource a:ld should be ;:-es;rved as suc!'\. :;e eili on ':.''le 3ol.1tr~old To .. Baed to aid ~... 't~~.:; ~~eaar?J.':ior:.. If. ~ /J () 10 maiN (b.d ; t"Y'A- [' t(,.'1,~ l/(~ t-6~ i f z.u.nc .~(flidl.lf- '. 11.",,~ );; d f.- (.,.( Ie-- d. q K - '10 ~"l t. 2. , ! J. or ( I :. / f'---" " - e~~. Iz, /q ,~r~. -' t7 C:w~: t::r f ;,./ -:/ !. ~ ~. ). " . . . . I To qupte f~o= the p~esent J.velop~ent ?l~~ of .h. Town of datej Se;tepbe~ 14, 1978, pa~ 12, artlcle 1 & 2, -Posltlve measures should be take~ to aS3~~e that land now ir agrlcultural useag. should r,Qaln in s~ch us. to~ as ~~~ yearetto com. as Posslbl.....Major residential development should b. di ected to the south of Route 25, and alo~~ a nar~ow strip on th north shore abutting :ong Isl~~d Sour.d.- It!'lo:d. i Ae, t*. undersigned, petition The Southold Town Board to disapprove of I a zoning chtnge tro= residential-agric~ltural to multiple houslng for "SeacNtt-,. 47 ac~e field just no~th ot. Cutchogue. CO:'lsideration ot such a chan~e r' s CQIL:ter to the present developme:'lt plan. . .--- . -.. . --- - -- ------ . -" - "_. --..... ~urth ~ore, we believe that these pri=e agr:cult'~al l~~ds are a 7recLous. f nlte resource and should be ~~ese~ved as such. ;ie call on ~~e Southold To' -. Board to aid !~ ~"l..:; ::re3.er'!:l':ior.. J. 1. 2. , .:1. ~'~... 6 f: . " I ~"\8 4J83 7. , ,P--~__ . 3. ,. p~~ ~~~ - :-fj' );.st. ;/ ~- ) LO. ~ 1. .2. 5. :~ --<.' z-U7t ~~ ~. (OV~(.. ,'L -. s. - ~ ~ '. , . . To'quot. tros the pr.'.~t Dev.lo,me~t ?l~~ ot rn. ro~ ot ~ou :<1, <1a~ej Se~tez~e: 14, 1978, p~ 12, artiel. 1 & 2, .positivl measur.. should b, ta~en to aS3~r. that lar.d now in agrieultural useag. should r.oain in sueh us. tor as ~~~ yean ,to eOGl. al possible... .MaJor resLdentlal d"If:O;Cl~~t ,~.ould b. di~.ot.d to the south ot Rout. 25, and alo~~ a narro_ strip on th.1 north shore abutting :ong IslL~d 30und.. ie, th~ undersigned, petition The Southold Town Board to dlsap~rove ot a toning eharge troGl residential-agricultural to multiple housing tor ".5ea~r'ott.,. 47ac~ tield just north o( Cutchog'..le. Co:':st:1er'aUon ot s'.Ion - Zl._.c_h_ar-6~.r"..lE COIL"!~_e.!_ ~~ ~~_!.pr~sent d_e~e~o;<Il~nt P1.a.n,_ _._ :urthe ore, we believe that these pri:e a6rlcult'Lr'al 1~,d3 ar~ a ;'r'ecLo\.lS, ri ite resource and should be ;reserved a3 ;::uch. i.e calt on ~'le 3out~old To . Soard to aid t~ t~i3 ;ra3e~v~~i~~. l. f. t.<. I e-l, () ~ 1...-<.- <- ~7 y fl ,.,. L<"'{..l...1 ~ '!.i..-. n !. I. . ~ I 17- 6l.cu l0 . bo_~\...O.; r . ~"".- .-, J_.~fj d~-.: ~ (' . : . rl(~(h- . J(il~/~. m~i --'--- d-t~ J.. .. ~~ ),.'f. /J14f/ fuc.k N.' / /9' .j-..z . . 'To q\Oot. fe-oill the pC'esent Develof t ?la."\ of .he rO\lt7l o! ;:ou~ho:d. da~ej Sellte::!':e: 14. 1978. p~ 12. utLc. J 1 & 2. ' .Positive measures should be taken to assure that la."\d now i~ agrIcYltural useage sho\Old re~ain in such use foe- as ~a.~ year. ito come as posslble....Major resIdentlal deyelofment should be di~ected to the south or Rout. 25. and alon6 a narro. strip on the north shoe-. ab\Otting Song Isla."\d Sound," ;ie. the unde:si~ed. petition The Southold Town Boud to dlsappe-ove of a zoning ch~e fe-om res~dential-agricultural to multiple housing for "Seace-oft". . 47 acre fleld just north of Cutchogue. CO:1sLde:ation ot such a chan~e r~s COIL,-:er to the present'de;elof~~nt plan. . . -- - :'~; th~lrmore ,~~ - heli~;;~that the~e-pri:::e agr!c ul tur;i-la.."\dS a:e a ;-:eclous, fi ite resource and should be prese:ved a3 such. >ie call on ~'1e 3ou'::hold To . 3ca:d to aid t" t"l:; ~:'e3er'!J.':ior.. 1. 2. ) . ~>>~?t/~ -~~ '1 - /.~/l. ..Pet'. .#<!C~~ c. t 51 ::bt/~/c/~ 7~5'- /3 :lqg- $13c 1 Pilr~~/t-er-r<< ?l -- 7i 1- ~ . r , ..- 1. . 7 34 - 7371 . If 13:5 1190's . . ~ . To quote from the presE da:ed Sep:e~ber 14. 1978, pa6 Development ?lan of the Towr. of _ 2, article 1 & 2, ho:d. "Po91 tive measures should be taken to aSS'-lre that lalld now in agricultural useage should re~ain in S'-lch use for as mar.l yearsl to come as possible... .Major residential develo~ment should be directed to the south of Route 25. L~d along a nar~ow strip on thb north shore abutting :on6 IsIL~d 30und." de. the undersigned, petition ?he Southold Town Board to disap;rove of a zoning ch~~ge from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "3eaoroft". ,a 47 acre field just north of Cutchogue. Cons Idera ticn of such _ ?l.c.h_an~e r'4s COIL,~-er. t~ t~e p~~sent d_ev~lo~ment plan.. :urth+~ore. we believe that these price agrlcul::.:~al l~ds are a ~reclaus, f~nite resource and should be ;res~rved as such. ~e c311 on !~e 3o~t~old To'~ 3ca:i to ai ;" ~~~~ Jre3erv~:i~~. 1. /C( . j}. (Z,-,~. J(!~ / , 1/- P C7.' :. .L~4 IL-<'-.H?L. ~ ,{C ,f.J.~ ,,<..:..><-<.... c.t. --0....",. " '7/. ':/ ' ., / L ~~- K --: /;-, .. ~. . / ,--;/ . L / L {~;,. / /. tf;.. (' ~:L ~-<: ~-t~'1Vt.C I "'f1-<-z.,L-/' lif- i (..c.."c /.. ~-: 'f;t..lJ~ j f. Utl..J..J'-<J!,!i ,W, f:~.. l~dUi,;'<li_ /1, I ,,'. . I .......1:;: >i..., AY ~ ' ~-=-,. P?- e1 ~~<' ~ ~~"1 17 r: . () /i I) /) /.,. L" _ --{i, Lo~ U::.J- LJLJ.Lu/'Ct']f-i2-I', Iii> ___ 1 1I.twll(~~lfri/l ,(i<~tl.~uJN\.( ~ (JfJ Cr. Gd;4:t7~ ~, /'rl. /L'l:J1. 'I L 1 ~ il ,..-- .'^4 t ) ) -~ ~./-. IJ (.;,,"7i ~ ".~ 2, ~ {2d..J . 1 ~ '--- .~ - .//.f'- Cf.- t-I;, -<-G ,? 1)'35- , /' / {, ~ ~ u'- ~d'''fr - //13 J../ (~.d;,,/, AI \ I / ~ r r4J '"G ~" ',,'(1.,, t ; I q 3,'- I / f 4. .J I .~'.~ ) ;J l,.!~ . ld1:bV\ 1J~ 1(1.l, \- I 11. 12. ~' ~J. /:?:. ( I 13). j::t. .. - /;; L L0:7 ,--:. 5. ~, I ~"l.s 1f.-1 [i' '{/-t7.& . '"k1 d:' ~ h. (kulLf-::;:-~,,!r I ( i . . -:-> f " \ twA &vrvrn , o. -r'. 8. ~Iw.. ~"((M." -" .., . . ':'3.:e i i i i TJ ql.ltte fro:!! Se;te. ':::et'" 14, i I "?ositive mea.sures should be take:"\ to aSS'lre that la..~.1 ~O'''' i . agrlc'll tura.l useage should re::Jai'1 in such :.:se for as ::Ja.n:r :rears to cO::Je as pOssible....Major residential develapme:"\t should te :ii e~ted to the south of aaute 25. and along a narro... strip on tr. north shore ab;,;,tting :'ong Island 3ound." the present Development ~lan of 1978. pag~ 12, article 1 & 2, ~~e TOWT. o~ :c~t~~:j. ,ie, t e undersi~ed. petition '!'he SOllthald Town Board to disap?ro'le of' ~ ZJ:"\i~g ch ge from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for ".:;ea~,oft". 47 acre field just north of Cutchaf1-ie. CO:lsiie:-ati.:Jn of 5'..::h ~ .ch_~~e ru. 5 C~!L~:er ~~ the presen~ ~~velo;m~~t plan. :~rth rnQ~e. we c;li~ve that these pri=e agr~c~l:~ral 1~~j6 ~~e a '''~n.'''''~ -.,.... f",...,ite ~"'so'I-""'e a~'. s"'.'uld"''' ~ese"ved'" l' ..----...~, .~.&. ...-....'- .4'-4 ...... ..._~~ .. a.;)2UC.l...1.eca....o!"'. -:'~e ~:)i;.:;....,~:'j ':T.. goa:-i tv ai.j;~ ...."": - . ., _~rs~'.~!",'.':!. : i 2::. .., /)1 "' ~ -LL.'-'V1 ,..; ~/l. V '1 " \" I . .... (, /. '1-), ',.,', ....... ___~~.1...'v ___ ~_:"-!..:--~..:.:.<.* ___. Z }}/~,~I ~~ /,(!J:I4c.f- __h_____ , - :/v.Jiir.M7-dJ___q _~~ C -7i=- (P uL ~~ Y! ~ ,..- __.feu (.j,~llJ~- _____.___ ~~~ J '- , -. --- -'.-.--- . '-.'-.'-' ) . " . -. 1 , - .~-- ._~ ....--.-- .1 . .2. , o. 7. {J 0--]-'-. + _ G. u (l , ,t-::-r1 _ _ . da ~e'd r , , , 1'0 qlote frolll the. nt Jev.lopa:ent ?Ian of The Town of 3outho:d. Se;t =~e~ 14, 1978, ~e 12. article 1 & 2, I "Positive III 3:.u'es should be take:! to assure that lar.d new n agricultural useage should remain in s~ch use for as =ar~ year to com. as pOssibl.....Major residential development should be d'reeted to the south of Route 25, and along a narrow strip on t e north shore abutting :0"6 rsl~~d Sound," . . .ve, he unde~signed, petition The Southold Town Board to disapprove of a zJni~g c.ar.ge from residential-~icultural to multiple housing for "Seacroft", a 47 ac}"~ field just nortb of. Cutchogue. Considet"ation of such 'lchar.;?;,e ["1 ns c,)'l.,~et"_ t~ the. pr.!se~t d_ev;~o;m"'nt plan,. . _... ?~rth r~ore, we believe that these pt"i=e agricultural lar.da are a ;:!'ec :ous. f' ni te resource a::.d shvuld be ;reserved a3 such. ~;e call on ":''le 7. ~,,~ ;&'~ .. 9ca.:"j to a.:d ;~ ~\..~3 .:re3er.r.:.":i.J:':.. 2 , ~~~,!.:;{~ ft,st. ~\?lJ S LL rfu. ,4~~: !{_~w-A~~ k; .~.l..~L_____ /7~-.;' IlL ) )1.1..:tt;..t:".i 1 ~(.~~ -" -.--- >-.-.- Lu{~_~ ~~./ t~ o '3. '\ ~~~ ~~ /lc~_ J......-. ..:J I eCfl"'"X.- 'i:. 'J.. 5. s. I<.J..t.{.Luc... L , ~c~ :J 'S.~~.-h III rv. <;~ t. _I ii, '- -- ....., /l. . . ja tej ete fro III the prese:'lt Devel' e:'lt ?lan of :'he ro~ of .scutho:'d, 1978, page 12, arL.le 1 &. 2, "Positive lIleasures should be take:'l to assure that land now i:'l agricultural useage should remaln in such use for as many year to come as pOssible....Major reslde:'ltial deve:'oplIlent should be directed to the south of Route 25. and along a narrow strip on t e north shore abutting :'01".6 Isla.'1j 3ou.nd." ../e, t e u."dersigned. petition 'The 3outhold 70wn Board to disap;;rove of a z~ning ch '1ge from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "Seacraft", a 47 ac!"~ field just north of Cutchoc':Ue. Co::slderation of s:.;ch ~..cr,a.'1g_e r _,s cOIL,':er_ t~_ th~ present develo;;ment plan. ?urth ~ore. we believe that these pri~e agricultural l~'1qs are a ?rec~ous. f :'lite resource and should be ;reserved a3 such. ~e call on ~~e ';;:JiJt:--.old T0 .4 Boar1 to aid ~,.. t...~::: .~~a3er..'::!':iJ::. ~ 4. . 1. ~c!~/.~ v-L-L .~~ P~. ~ 2. IJ/i~l- '/~; /3~ ~ /~ d~~A. J. 7/.//' . 1':;;;a?Y!d/n~' 4a;/?Z~. " 1 . .... bL~k,,--.. _ .' v!4!Cd II LJ "--L Ii /'//1./41,:.-- /.1 '-,; l - 'j C~ I J; J.J'--'~ I/r?;-, . 1... (1~<,~y<- (tct:J~(-vZ-- / (7;;(_ /1<;7 . 'I' ; I ~ ';) ~"- 1/ 1). (195) - :6. .7. '.({...l... i~~ ( i3J - / I f -1<- . . To qote from the present DevI:o; da~ej Se~t =:e~ 14, 1978, page 12, art' ,: ~lan or :he Town of 2cuth~:j, 1 &. 2" no.. year be d on t "Positive measu:es should be taken to assure that land n agricultural useage should remain in such use for as ~~~ to come as possible....Major residential deve~opment should rected to the south of Route 25. and along a narrow strip e north shore abutting Song Island .3ol.md." de, he undersigned, petition The Southold Town Board to disapprove of a zoning c.~~ge from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "Seacroft" a 47 aC-E"~ field just north of. Cutchog'..:e. Considerati"n of su:::'1 _ ~__c.h.an5.e r'ns c<)'L,tez:_t~. the. pr!!sent d.ev,:~opmt:nt plan.. :urt,er=ore, we believe that these pri~e agri:::\I1:~.al l~~ds are a ~~ecio\ls. inite resource and should be ~reserved as such. ~e c~ll on The .3o\l:h01d T wn 30arj to aid t" ..."" ~ - '. ......JI ::-reaer'lZ!. ~i'::1. . 1 ~Jdt iPc/ Ct~~ IV, > '/ ~' {// -".-r b. ~;'/;/~~c-cYc'.k7)-A (/ / /cr. c u (C:4q? L-- 7C/, v 2.,of' cUe ',/~ ?'(yi~ :..' ft-tl1lf,/ 6. 1. 7. ~ v. 11. 12. 1). 14.. 15. 16. 17. ... . To q o~e ft'Om the ~ iatect 3e~t ~~e~ 14, 197a, . ent Develo;a:ent :'lan of "he :'OW':'1 o! '::outho:d, .~ge 12, article 1 ~ 2, new year 'ce d on t "Positive measures should be take:1. to assure that lard n agricultural useage should re~ain in such ~se tor as ~~~ to come as pOssible....Major re3iden~ial develoFm~nt should reote1 to the south ot aoute 25, ~~d alo:1.g a narrow strip e north shore abutting :'ong Island 3ound," .Je. he unde:-signed, petition The 3ol.ithold Town Board to disap~rove of a z~:1.i:1.g c,ar~e trom residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "3ea:roft" a 47 ao_re field just north of Cutchogue. Conside:-ation of 5'-'0'1 ::., .c_han~e r' ns caIL,'::er _ to_ th~ p_resen t d_evelo;;mr::1.t plan., :C1rt: e=o~e, we belie'/d that these prii:le agrl.:ul:'..ral l:L"ids are a .~t'ec:Jlls. inlte resou:-oe a:1.d s::ould '::e ;:reserved a3 suc'1. ,;e call cn :'"1e ";oui;r-.old!' wn 3oa:--1 to ;ild {roo "'\0,:".-; ::re3e!"..'.J.~i..::-,.. 1 . ~ <. . :~ . I, ~. s. ~ / . atv n ,I..(: :J ;. /1/ 1/ J. ". / . , , I j' 1/ , f >J tL ~ Ij {J i( t t {( ~^'?-~ ~ ~r /..) vo I. ' -M" '/J ~ )&d& ~~ Q. 10. 11. 13. t4. 15. 16. 17. / k-t:h.4r~'---'- ,',("Ie" .~ ~~ v~______ ~f~~ ;rt/ I ;/ I' I- ,,/ '-' 4 41:- /~. -.0 '- J'G{ / (' :l I ~:...:tc .\.S). \ \I 1/93 ~ I IC(~~- ( ('7'J ~ D-" . . :0 ; o~e f~om the p~ese~t Jeve j~:ej 3e;t ~:e~ 1~, 1975, ~age 12, a -e:'!.t .'la.'"1 of -:!"'l.e Tcw:i. of -,... :10:::1, ~e 1 !< 2, "?ositive measures should be ta;.:e:1 to a3s'-'~e that lar.d nc~ in agricultu~al useage should ~e~ai:1 i:1 such ~se fdr as =aP~ years to co~e as possible....Majo~ ~e3ide:1tLal develo;cent s~ould 1:e dir-ected to the south of ~oute 25, and alo:1e; a na:ro.... strip on tl'.e nor-th sho~e abutting :'ong Isla!1d .:Jo'.Lr.d." ./e, t~e ur.ce:"signed, petition The .5outhclJ Town .:oa:d to disap;r-ove of a zO:1ing ch ~ge from residential-agricuLtural to multiple housing for ";;ea.::r.)ft", a 47 acre field just north of Cutchov..e. C0:1s1det'ation of su:::'l ;.. .c.h.a::--ii.e !":.J."'.S C'~!L~ ~er to_ the preser:. t d~velo;m~~ t ~13..n. :ur-t~ ~or-e, we believe that these pr-i=e asri'::ul:u:"~l l~~ds ~re a :~:ec~o.;.s, f nite reso:J:'ce and s~ould ce :7res9::--.rej a3 such. :_'~ call or.. :"'.e ~~ut~clj ~a ~ 3oa~j to ~id i_ ~~~~ :~s3cr~~~i~~. --. - -. ....- } .... ;;. 1:). '-" ~ '. , .- 11. 12. 1J. 14. ~5 . l6. l7. ,a L ---.J I' '-Z...(,~ W~~ )/1.aJ7J ~J / r c; ) 0.,0 ) . """"'::.- --------.-- I ' '. ~. , , 6. / /,~ if e/taM CCl-~~ ~( A~..___.._ C/ X(Jje.f-A /7 ? I ~ss- to~v.:r.Jo::;d \::):-. ~\'\c\\1,~\.\,.\( \\-,:; Nair;k 5 }).r._-_Yh~1L,dL2cJs:.___lf5.Id. -- --_.-2.._v...---i1-~ /;ry/ $ -a~c-~7.v/7~ ~ ., ~ II Ih:.- ~ k __li-u. r/4:~....__.__. ~~~ ~~ c ,J- ~.~~ ~~ 1J1~LL~ I Jr>v( -&-r"-'r ~ " 7;7 ~ .I ,. oY . . To q ete f~om the p~esent Devele dated 3e;t =~e~ 14. 1978, page 12, art. .:t ?lan ot :r.e 40~ e 1 &: 2, f ';:olJtho:d. "Positive measures should be take~,to aS3~re that land now 'n a~icultural useage should remain in such use for as many year to come as possible... .Major residential development should te d're~ted to the south of Route 25. ~~d along a narrow strip on t e north shore abutting :,on6 Isl~"1d SOT.md." Ae. he undersigned, petition The Southold To~ Board to disapp~ove of a zoning c ~"1ge from residential-ag=icultural to multiple housing for "5ea.:~oft" a 47 ac_r~ field just north of Cutcho;!;Ue. Consideration of s;.:c'1 <:.c}\_an6.e r' ns cOlc'-te,r_~o_th~ present develao;ment plan., :urt~e~ore, we believe that these ~ri~e agricul:~ral l~"1ds are a ;~ectous. .inite resource and should be preserved as ~uch. ~e call cn ~~e 3ou"'t::.'Jld :- .~. Soard to aid ;.... 't~~:; _:re$er",'2. ~i :::. 1. 2. J. '. ~. , .., - -Clh I' ,/0 . ../., .-'-. ' 3 . -:e:: .--/ - - - ~ clLrA<V L.~\,-...-\- @.,~..-,... cZ?-. =::_!:~_ 10. ~':'a...~ .., ~il'-\ 11. /7 ~, 12, ~~ ~../_ ',....... 9. 1). ~4 . .5. .6. .7. ~L f/,.,--d 7~ tl~ ,,<>~ ~T-,- ~ 1\/ L1 0-'~- C;~I '5~U '.,(.f.L .,..- / I... rJj...l/ . - . '" .... ~.7 ~k<-~~G t'th,d-.v/ --~--_._-_.- --- 1'llt:L--:tIJu.,e!< 7?v /?~(,d~ :7J h! fJ( / < IJ~""'''<-- I ( . . 70 qote fro~ the ~resent Jevelo~ ja~ej 3e~t ~:er 14, 1975, ~age 12, arti t ?lan or :he 7owr. or :o~th~:d. 1 & 2, new year l:e d on t "?ositive ~eas'~es should be take:'l to aSS'Jre that la.~,d n a~icultural useage should remain in such use ror as ~ar~ to come as possible....Major residential de~elo~ment should rected to the south or aoute 25, ~~d along a narro~ strip e north shore abutting :'on.g Isla.-:d JOlJl1d," .Ie, he undersigned, petition The ::;o\.:thold Town Board to disap?rove of' a z:ning c.a.~ge from residential-agricultural to multiple housing ror "'seacraft" a 47 acr,e field just north of Cutcho€;Ue. CO:1sideraHon of s'..::'1 _ :1..c.ha:-.g.e r'r.s C'JIL:.ter to. the present developme:1t plan. :urt.ermore, we belie,e that the3e pri~e agricultural l~~js are a : c'ec ~o:Js, ini te resou:"ce and s:...iJuld be ;:resar....dd as ~uch. ',ie call en 7ne 3olJ.:!,.Qlj T"~. 3oa~j to ~id ;... 4\.,:.~ _~:-e..;er"~.':l~i.;::. 16. . ::_LP{Z ~~~ ~?/~!h(~~_ 4.U_" _ '-C.-~~ 6~h...&?~ . . . . J. .~. t. ~I'.d, , ./kd4-z; Ut ~ fh~~_.__'Y~ 7... ~ C:), C?~~~_ /.-g. iI' e;z;~~ I 1/.). ~~ 7?Y. :L c. 1). 14. 15. 17. .. 0 ..;..........., .~ .., r , . . . 'To qu ~e fro~ the present Developmer dated Se;te ter 1~, 197a, page 12, ar~icl Ian of !he ro~ of :o~tho:d. & 2, now i years be di on th "Positive m~asures should be taken to a9s~re that land agricultural useage should remain in such use for as oany to come as posslble....Major residential developoent should ected to the south of Route 25, and aloni a narrow strip north shore abutting :ong Isl~~d Sound." , ~e. t e undersigned. petition The Southold Town 30ard to disapprove of a zoning ch nge from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "Seacroft", ~7_a<:F~ field just north or Cutchogue. CO:'lsideration of such a..c-";ar.~~ ru. s cO'L:.te_r. t~ ttl~ present deve}o;;:Clent plan.. ._. Purth =ore, we believe that these prime agricul ~'.ral la!ldg ar'J a ::rec lO'Js. f' ni te resource and should be ;;rese::-ved as such, ;;e cai I on ':''1e 3out~old .. Board to aid t" t"i:; ::reser"a~io:'l. ~ , ,. ~ . ~ l. /7J ~ " t'~0!( C;~/~Jr >. 1. " .j, . ,"j~L' /-, , G<......-f-c. k t") L"""'- -- ~_.~.._- (! ctCL'SkG IZ. - . ~~t~ L,("'.'y.cL__ ~t.vt J . , '. ! " . L. L'I'--, l..-<...v-, ") -- ~( --t.~~ , ) )j .--IoM.- .., v. 2. J. . . ). ). ~' . I ~ '7 \ I. Y1-.-t-1 / I. . To quJte r~om the p~esent Oevelo;~e ~lan or ~he Town or :outho:d. Se;; tet"ee: 14, 1978, page 12, artic' l do 2, "Positive measures should be take~ to assure that l~~d now i agricultural useag. should remain in such use ro~ as many years to come as pOssible....MaJor residential development should be di ected to the south or Route 25, and along a nar~ow strip on th north shore abutting Long Isl~~d So~~d," dated ~e, t e undersigned, petition The Southold Town Board to disapp~ove or a zoning ch ge from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "Seacraft", 47acE~ field just north of, Cutchogue, Consi-ieration of st:ch _ il_c.t':a.~e;.e r'. s CO~l.,t~!:_ t.~ ~he,pr~se!1t d_eve~o;ment ;;lan'h :urth .more, we believe that these prime a~lcul~t:ral l~~ds are a ~rec:ous. f'nite resour"ce and should be ;rese:ve:i as such, ;;e call on ~'\e Southold 3oa.:"d. to aid i... 't'"'~,J ~re3er".':l "':i.:r... . - . 2 , V,{l:.--~<- & (; '. - '7~,,-'--(i , ---.--.--..... - C~ Mcfi ~ J.sY. ::1. J. ~. " 5. , :). .,. - -. ~uJ S C'<_<J.l;~~..c:. 1j r ~\n.ih~ U..C 9."6 ~ t.L-lclt~C:: t<-<...- >1. . &~~~.~/ ,'~ - L 1 }t.,~ ,,~~. "g / I? 7 / Wt~.} /lfsJ/ - j //7J- ? II /,3/ . ~~~'r~'--r1 (IY~'7 . ~ :.-,-L'.u!...a-o~.;/ (,/ //73...:.- /1 . C'-~:\ & 'i. - - . To qu te fro III jated Se~te ber 14, . the present Develop 1978, page 12, artic The Town of Southo:d, ~ ?lan of _ 1 &. 2" new i years be di on th .Positive lIleas~es should be take~ to ass~re that land agricultural useage should remain in such use tor as ~ar.y to come as pOsslble....Major residential development should ected to the south ot Route 25, and along a narro* strip north shore abutting :'ong Island So'md." ole, t e undersigned, petition The 5ol..lthold Town Board to disapprove of a zJning eh ge frolll residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "Seacroft", 47 ac!,.e field just north ot C'..ltchog'..le. Consideration ot such _ ;]...c-'\al'.~e ru.s cQII.""'!';er-.ta_ the pr-esent d.ev;lo;{!.e:-,t plan.. :urth ~or-e, we believe that these pri=e agricultural lar,d? ar-e a ::rec ious, f' ni te resource and should be preserved as such. :ie call on ~'1e ::; 01.1 t:-.old to aid ;~ t~~3 ~ra3erv~~i:~. 1 - . ..LC-<A.... , - . ~. - ~-- ---.-.---..-. ). IJW~~ , I. o. 1.J{~_Vv 2.4-' J. .~ eli. ~. 5. C . , J. ,. .,. 11..t.w l~ M- './7~l /1 , L -i...-./-._.-LJ ~ '-'./ ., - / n\.ilici... ~ \ \,1 /(~r-.-I ~I ,lei, ( /z _...I ./ C .--t.-~ ~/? ,Le. t L.-, .::L0~t C. . -- I ' -x " ,fir " , --";'--~~/ . . To 1a';ed ee !. the present a.velop. 1978, p~ 12, artic_ ?lan ot ~he Tor.'! ( 1 & 2, Sou';ho~d, "P, Itiv. measures should b. taken to ass~re that l~~d agri~ultural useage should reoaln in such use tor as ~ar~ to cooe as posslbl.....Major r~sldential develo;m~nt should eoted to the south ot aout. 25, and alo~ a narrow strip north shore abutting :ong Isl~~d Sound." now i years be d1 on th Ae, t e unders1~ed, petition The Southold Town Eoard to dIsapprove of a z:n1ng ch e trom residential-agricultural to multiple housi~~ tor "3ea:::rot't", a 47 aC-E.e field just north of. Cutchog'.le. Consi.ieration of such fl..c_h_ar..g~r s COt.l.;~eF_ t~ t.~~_present d_eve~opmer.t pla.n._ _.. :urth r=ore, we believe that these pri~e agricultural l~~ds are a :crec lous, f ni te r:sou.:'ce a:'1d should be preserved as :::uch. ;.e cai 1 on :'he 3outhold to aid ~" t~L~ ~~a3erv~:i=~. .. I 1. I I " " , . I ..,l(..,'{.' S I -.c. ('.c..6- , C, '" I ,. . I .-. N " 't..b?'"\j./i~ fYi4. 7:ut'k ~.. S,,~ LL~_ (~ ).. t/ L/. .7tua r7 c.: {'] ( ") /.),-c.....-L" ~ '~...::..." ~ , f /1<-;'71 "' "' \ :x :X'~~ r- _ C~Ic/..~~ hoLt '14 ' -,t.,. ~ /JtA '/ ?' c"f' -1/ ./ J. 7'. i,J" / '-..J:'" -I }. ,. , ". . . I ft ..r z... .9;~ /3 ~ h If' .~" v., LJ7/ <(.~.u.. ~/i --. L . . . To q ote from the present Develo~Glent ?lan of "he room of 3outho:d, dated 3ept ~ter 14, 1978, page 12, article 1 & 2, "Positive measures should be taken to assure that land now in agricultural useage should recain in such use for as ~any years to COGle as pOssible....Major residential developcent should be di ected to the south ot Route 25. and along a narrow strip on th north shore abutting Long Isl~,d Sound." Sout~old To - -~ (\ -;7- ..../ - '-'/ 1. .f '-.(1;., /,tvL- /:::r~ \-,- -! ~.... ......., ~ I, {II, '.11"/ .... I ~ ~U"~'. 11 ~ C. . . . (~ / J. {~'U e undersigned, petition The Southold Town Board to disapprove or a zoning ch .ge trom residential-agricultural to multiple housing for .. 3eacrort", a 47 ac~~ field just nort,1l. of. Cutchogue. Conside~ation or such _ ~_c_h_an~~ r ,'s cOllnteL t~ t'!.! pr~sent d,ev-:~op-m.e:1t plan,______ ?~rth ~ore, we believe that these price a5r:cultural l~,ds are a ni te resource and should be preserved a3 such. ;;e call en :''le 30ard to aid i.... th:3 ~re~ar~~~iu~. C.. [; l<-,"- ~ '/1 it /,; 1./ 'J. .J ".(?( 6-I{.( L /7 t,./ "), Vi II ,/ '/ 9, /7Z<.,; k.--' . -. ._~~ L;; /. " .. " <;:;-1-1 c.-" <- # ttJW-~k {i{ft? CJJ.:k~~J~ - 0 / . 'tt:.ttc ,(/ (... J;(/~ad/ 7/.'< 1 ') I ~ _/ //{t4-.~ "c.;(. G-~:L-c L [F'-C 2. . ./J ....~' v~-ALL*:'~ -~_..._- 7. 3. /JU'l- '" I: .s--;.."" <...h./J~~- /' -r--/. .<.f..,...-lc~.:-c."~ ~C'~ \~\ -- . , \ ;'\~',....~' .'" . \- J.'""( \~\" ) kuL C;....--.Ic. ~ . . :'0 qu ~e froal the pt"esent j)evelo;:~' :'lan of .he Tow: h':ed 3e;::e, oet" 14, inS, page 12, ar~ic__ 1 &: 2,- f 201.. t;~.o:d. "?os ~ ti ve meas\U'es should be take:'1 to assure tha t land :iCW 1. agricul ~!Jr:\l useage should re::lain in such use rot" as ::lany years to corne as pOssible....Majot" t"esidential development should ce di ected ~o the south of ~oute 25, and alonb a narrow stt"ip on t1: nOt"th shot"e abutting :'on6 Isla.'"ld 30'-<.'1d," e undet"si~ed, petition 'l'I1e Sout~olj Town =oard to disap;:Jro"e of nge ft"om t"esidential-agricultut"al to multiple housing fot" "3eacr'Jft", 47 act"e field j:Jst not"th of Cutchoeue. CO:'1sl.deration or S'JC'1 :...c!'\a:-.~e t"'J, s CC'L:':er to the ;:resent deve~Q;':l":1t ;:lan. :::ore, 'He believe that ti:ese pri::e as!" lc u1 :'Jra1 la!'..-:::; :J.re a ;:'~C:~~3, fi ite resou~ce a~d should be ~res3~ved a3 ~uch. ~ie call on :~e .:iout::....Jlj 7r;' ~ 3oa:-1 to al.j ;~ ~'"':.:; :r-c&;er..:.':i'::--d f3 I '3,' P-<V-' . .~~(.. /,,{J ,. =-:_. {l \<<:~t<." 'V~ I TCC r~~ J;"'c::...,,7:Vl 5c-,u -Il,c // tv., (" ~-~- ; ~: -~--'. .c.-&.-:. c... Ji'(j/)/'1'1 jJ ~r" ~.IL~<<: /.;/ ;- '. ~-/!-l<.i" .(. .L:J:ii_ /itJi!...,:~, tL~ !?w-t L&~ ,",\" .,' ;,/) j. , p - .J r~ / 1..1,; J /,l......t~~'- 7 ,-:, ,. I.; /- I'. v _ , / ~ _ z:: ...J ,'~ J , lo-'" ., ~ , . . i....--"'" ~....'l.,..-' " -';,,;-d,{ {'/kh , -. ..17 ' l.,..., (._.....-:~ I - t....!___ '. J. 1. ~ 'r:::~(...- ---..---;- {,/ L. l e:.' ~_~,..\j 1 ", 2 . J. /""" ~-- - ,. _-1 . "-.j.. /f . /.....1.. '!-a:: / , ~~~, l.;;>/ec..-n:r,'l. "-- ~ C~T--:~- I ' (~~ tJc,..aC-/~,-(/' f' ;7~cl ... - ~. ~ ' ".... J""? -:'~ I ."...".., ~~'L I"" '/A<;..'..a.-::! ~'- /", Ilt.J:...!J'l'J'/" '";/ M1V i~~!t.t.I/, 91 ~L /~L./ / ~. 5. .1 , J , '.' /1 /.;' 7. ;jlf J// ;-t . . . To qu te trolll the present Development an of 1'lle :'own o~ Sc'~tho:d. dated Se;te ~er 14, 1978, pa~ 12. article _ ~ 2, "PositiYI measure. Ihould be taken to ass~r. that lL~d agricultural useage Ihould r.~ain in s~ch us. tor as ~~~ to come aa possibl.....Major residential develoFoent s~ould ected to the south ot Route 25, and along a narro. strip north shore abutting :ong Island 30'~d." now i yearl b. di on tll ~e. t . undersigned, petition The Southold Town Board to disapprove of a z,ning c nge from residential-agricultural to multiple housing tor "Seacrott", 47 ac.E'.~ tield just north ot. Cutchogue. Co~sider'at1on ot such _ ?-..c.h_a."..g.'!! r s cO'.l:"lte_r_ ~~ th.~present d_~ve~opme~t pla.."l._ __. ~urth rmore, we believe that these pri~e agrIcultural la.~ds are a ;-reclous. f'nite resource a~d should be preserved a3 such. ;;8 call on ':'he 3outr.old To .. !loard to aid t" ~"1.~ ~re5er-!:l.':ior.. 1. , .. "'----<- ) . ~ ~--~) ~ &., ,j -~~~ ~l i:v~ \ /"'-dt r \1 CoxcAo 1 . . J'>-J_1... .. /' ' . :/. ,J (..~~ 1. '" '" t.J i .. -;. ,....f' I I "h\~. . o. ('u Ie h()~l t. \.E "vi. 2. :/ -~.! '-'.:~~ ,'/7 I.\. '~",'L..oV: J. ~. ,.., ;->/ -. ,. ~'>1 ) lL<./u!t.-r/ .,1 " .. o l\ ~ll n A i:./ //, 7' / ;J ~nL //f-.3;- , I q ')- '- /19 z.-- /t).. y, I J 9.3_~_ IV 1/. 11c;.?~-) . // ..~ 7/Y //7'.1 \ . . To qu te tro. the present Develop~ent ?l~~ ot rne Town or Southold. dated Se~te ~er 14, 1978, pa~ 12, article 1 & 2, .Positive measures should be take~ to assure that land a~icYltur.l useage should re~a1n In such us. tor as O~~ to come as pOsslbl.....Major restdential developoent should .cted to the south ot Rout. 25, and alo~~ a nuro_ strip north shore abutting :ong IslL~d 501~d.. no_ 1 years be di on th Ne. t . undersigned, petition The Southcld Town Board to disapprove ot a zoning ch ~e trom residential-agricultural to multlple housir~ tor "5eacroft., 41 acre field just north ot. Cutchog'..e. Co~sl.jeration ot s'..ch il.5:..h_ar.e;.!' r s cO'l.'"l~e.r_ ~~ tn.!.. present d_ev_e~o~~en t plan. _ _ _ . ~urth rmore, we believe that these pri~e a6ricultl~al l~~ds are a ;,:-ec tous. f' n1 te resou:-ce and should be ~reserved &3 =:uch. ;ie call on ':'~e 30uthald ':0 . 30ard to -d ,... 't""~.:; .7~e5et"?2.tio:-:.. ---. .-. ~ 1. {2 t f, 2 , C)..~ ~ .;' J. 0 \, [I 4. (/ \ t ~ , '" -. 7. )~ 2. c' 3. % I ~ 1: _ {JJiik_. '~ ;fA' 1. ft J. ~ 4. ~ 5. \ "-<..-, t. J ( 1.-(l. t.{'/ J J . --:-\ u~ ~ J. f'. 'n ~:;/t;jj \ ~ /1} (, ..~a "'--<t!..:....."""--<: 11Lct1 du J.~ lL- \:'-<,,! \... " )4.- ~ I ., to ,... , . '-V''-r.L~ _ Y1 ~/ . _'f.. . . , To qu ~e fro= the present Development ~lan of ~he Town of ~outh~~d, dated ~epte ber 14, 1978, pag, 12, article 1 & 2, "Positive meas'~es should be taken to assure that land agricultural useage should remain in such use tor as ~ar,y to come as possible....Major residential developoent should ected to the south ot Route 25, and along a narrow strip north shore abutting ~ong Island Sound." now i years be di 0"'. th Ae, t e undersigned, petition The Southold Town Board to disap~rove of a zoning ch ge from residential-agricultural to multiple housing tor "Seacroft", 47 aCF~ field just north of, Cutchogue. Consideration of such , ~.c}:.ang.e r'.! s Catl.~t~,r_t~t~~iE!sent d,evelo;ment plan., ?urth rmore, we believe that these prime agricultural l~1ds are a ::~'ec :ous, fini te resource and should be ;::ese:ved a3 such. ;;e ca11 on ':''le 3out:-.'Jld To . 3card to aid t.... t"":.3 ~r"e5er?~~io::. 'J ~! #i: = /I:".~~~/ , , ;' I~I /3<>:.. IJ~ s;):;.~ ~ c:.-::r vi c<.<'. 1. 2. , . . " "I r,-l...(,/- / r ~. -~-i' , / --':1'/ . . . J'(-..2.. '~h-to..L<.1.5"':'''': ->;"-'--r:t;~.-I (}./.....::! U ~~. . '~ h' 7' ~ ' . I' ~.- ~ 4~_ \., '-\.. ~ 1", /~~')7',-, -'~ '. -' I) ~, /:., / /. : " ' ~/ --r-- ......-.;, - -' -,' ,~ ~ '.. -' ~U(_fl.__._/t rrrl/(I7a-;.:; AJ~\f /1 r~ ._u__ / ' /J I; /J 'J 'J II (2 .('~ u..z! Ul r:"'!-r.-I'!./.R .:,.J. ./ ~ ;u::? 7 ......v. 'J q. .. .:.. y J. l. o. I. 1. '- JiJu.~f:,<i. )"7<,,- /) ~ / / ~ 1/ :rJ~ ,./}, 222/ .~I-: .;,~~ - '-~... 2--0 . !It<.~ ~V 2. J. .., . ,(., 'I. ~. , /, ~. /' '. t.<..... ~ \ ,. r---, L''-C":l..A-. /ill/ J - ....J __ - . . To ~u te fro~ the present Development ?lan of ~he 70wn of ~outhold, dated Se~te ber 14, 1978. page 12, article 1 & 2, "Positive zeasures should be taken to assure that land agricultural useage should remain in such use for as ~any to come as possibl.....Major residential development should ected to the south of Route 25, and along a narrow strip north shore abutting :'ong Island Sound." now i years be di on th ~ie, t e undersigned, petition The Southold Town 20ard to dlsap;Jrove of a zoning ch ge froz residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "3eacroft", 47 ac_r~ field just north of Cutchog'.le. 8o:1sideration of such -. :l..c..h.an6...e r'.l s cO'L,teF_ to_ thl~...jl.E~Se:1t d...evelopm.e:1t plan.... ?urthe ~ore. we believe that these pri~e a~:~ultural l~~j~ ~re a :;rec lous, fi i te resource and should be ;lreserved aa such. ;;e call on ~'1e 3out~old To Soard to aid i.~ t"::; .~rese~"t:l ti.:>~. ~~~ ~~--\- ... ~-<:- , . ~-v~ 17 t5 V ~~1tI.... ~v ~"-Cl.- ~'n'~. f ~ L.L.A, ~J /?:u-ft11!:D.-&l ~ C...,-Jit<J &~=:v 'A-.... ~ ~~ ..",,- .7// r....:J 9 \ \ , ( "., \ ~:c -e.. ~~.....(. /?<-l. ~"'X II ,./........J-!:',.//-~dC~..... /" Fv is' 1,'1 I <'...-V....- '. - / I '3 j- 'I ('I S'y' . /i",u__ L /,/ rP ~ ~ . . > ,To qu :e from the pre3ent ueVE dated 5eFte ber 14, 1978, page 12, ; !:Cent ?lan of .he Towr. o~ So', o:d, .cle 1 &: 2, new 1 years be :11 on th "Positive measures should be take:'1 to ass'~re that lard agricultural useage should remain in such I.l~e for as m~~y to come as possible....MaJor residential development should ected to the south of Route 25, and along a narrow strip north shore abutting Long Island 30und." ~oje, t e undersigned, petition 'l'!\e 50utholJ Town 30ard to disapprove of a zoning ch ~e from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "Seacraft". 47 acr.!t field just north of Cutchog'..le. CO:lsideration of S'.lC!". adc,h,ang.e ru. s COll.:t~_z::_ t~ th~__~!esent d~ve~o~mo:lt plan. ?~rth rIDore, we believe that these prioe asricult~ral l~~ds are a ::'t'(:C ~0,-!9. f ni te resource a:ld s:".ould be ;l=-eseC'ved 3.3 ;:uch. ;;e oai 1 01'. ':'"le -l._30~tt~0'" 30=d to aid ,- ,-" ."""v""'o. r . ,~~~ \~ , ~ jl ~ -;~ ~~-;- J , r ,I 2. 3. I. ~. '.::. 7 /~~ 3. lO. ~1. t2. LJ. 4. 7. III ... --- c:..tt-Q.~ 6....... - 8r A !jl. II ?J S____ -'-JJ2-~/<<(, tI / "---.. \<;'~ . , r-:.... j - ~ -'?"^"--"" . . , To q ote fNlII the prese~t De jatej Sert ~~e~ 14, 1978, page 12, 'rltent ::lan of .he l'0W!1 ot' ';:out~J:.:1, ticle 1 !. 2, "?ositive lIIeasures should be t;aken to assure that land new i~ agricultural useage should remain in such use for as lt~~ years to cOllie as pOssible....Major residential develoflllent should be directed to the south of ~oute 25, and alo~~ a narro* strip on ti'. north shore abutting :'o.'1g Isla.'1d .3o'.md." 6. ~~e. t.e undersigned, petition ~e Southoll :'own zoard to disap~rove of a zoning ch nge frolll residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "3eacroft", a 47 acre field just north ot CutcholUe. CO:1stderation of s'..:o'1 _ a,c,i'oar.6.e r'..l.s cO'I..,1:er. to_ the present develoI=m~:1t phn. ~ore, we believe that these prime agr:cultural l~'1d~ a~e a ni te resource and should be ;:rese~ved a3 2:.!ch. :;e c~ll on ":'1e .3outhold Soard to 'lid ;" .\o.!... '. ......: .~ra.;er~.'J. ": i:~. ,~ 1. . ~L~ ~ 2. ~ II I. ~. q~ 5. - , . . '"- 3. / ~&7o -}. 10. 11. ~2 . 1). .+- 5. If . I, 'r 7. 'LZ)O II . . To qu'~e from the prese~ ja~ej 3e;te":e~ 14, 1976, ~age !elo~i:en: :'l~"l of 7he Tor.: o~ . 12, article 1 & 2, ;~,'):"d, "?ositive Cleas:~es should be ta!te:1 to ass:..re that lar.d new i. agricultural useage should remain in such use for as ~~~~ years to come as possible... .Major residential develo~oent s~ould be di ected to the south of Route 25, and along a narro~ strip on th north shore abutting :'ong Island 3ound," .Ie. t.e under-siCled, peti tion ~e 3o~thol.j Town 30ard to disapjJrove of a z:ning ch nge from r-esidential-agricultur-al to multiple housing for "3eacroft", a 47 acr-e field just north of Cutchog;ue. Consideration of s'.lch ~ .chan~e ru s co'~,~ert~ the PEesent develo;~~:1t ~l~"l. :urth ~ore, we believe that these pri~e agricultural l~"lds ar-e a nite resource and should be ;reservej as Bucn. ~e cill on :~e ..",: - '. _.I :re3cr..'::' "':i:r:. 301,,;.t:-.old ~o .. Soa=j to ~id ,- - JL 7t I /) (;0 '3 .....nG - ^,/ / . L / l.1../ {&Ut: 'hu~.1 u d-- LA~c.-'L -Z I ' 't; '0'-_~'PJ.~~{j i{~ .--f'/;;}/ .~~_._~ ----=tn<> ~~, J h ecr" ('ad;" mClIf\l' c.'~ . Roa.6 I~~- ,;).581 u-~ ),1 -, ~'f _ ~SI7 12. 1J. 14. 15. 16. 11. . . h~ej ~e tt"OCl the present ;:;evelo;: t :'1a.."1 of 7he 7o~ ' te~ 14, 1978, page 12, arti e 1 & 2, :~;Jt;h,,:j, new i years te 1i on th "?osi ti ve measures sho'Jld be take~ to aSS\.ire tr.a. t 13.."11 agricultural useage shol.lld reJla:.n in s'Jch ~se rot" as ~ar.;; to come as pOssible....Major residential develo;:ment should ected to the south ot ~oute 25, ~.1 along a nart"ow strip north shore abutting :'ong Isl:L"'l:1 3ound." .ie, t e undersigned, petition The 3outhold Town 20ard to disap;Jro'J'e ot a z;ning eh ge trom residential-agricultural to multiple housi~6 for ";;eacroft", a 47 aer,e field j'.Jst north of CuteholUe. CO:1sidet"ation of s'..:ch ~~han~e ru S e~I~,ter_t~ the present develo;:ment ;:~"'l. :'.Jrth !'more, we believe that these pt"i~e a~icul~~!'al lar.ds are a ~!'ec:ous, f nite reso~!'ce a~d should 1:e ;:reser-ved as :::uch. :fe call or. :''1e 3out~old to aid i" ~h~3 ~~e~er~~~i~~. /6 (J ~ " ~9 . " . / 2. Ud ) f' /JrIj/lc6 ., ......,.{ ). tt J,,:.rt-0: ~. " I ~'/l~ :i. l.'-rzi/:-i" /CfA ~ di: ,. ~ / ~/ /J;~1 ;t!~ .a~_._.__.__~ 00 ~ //6 ':..L~ 13~". &7':3 .~J87IJ1 C, ~<e..L~, J. .... 7-- c;: Ed{c.d-7P~~.? ~-r-_LJ;;-- &:07-./ ) 7! ?L , ~. h.~ . l t.:~ ~;Y f/. I!~ (J 5. 6. 1. 10. ~ 11. 12. { .r,-. ~ "'- Q<..+.:..~ Y..<.-{ iJ 7. . . To q' ote frOM the present Development ~ iate1 3e;;t :n':er- 14, 1978, ~a6e 12, article 1 , Or The Town o~ ~o~tr.0:d, "?ositiva measures should be taken to ass~r-e that land now n agricultural useage should re:nain 1n s~ch use tor as ~~~y year to come as possible....Major residential development s~ould be d'r-ected to the south ot Route 25, and along a narrow strip on t e north shore abutting :'ong Isl~'1d .sound," de, he under-signed, petition The Southald Town 30ard to disap~rave at a zoning c ange from res1dential-agr-icultural to multiple housing tor ""eacroft", a 47 acr.e field just north of Cutchog'.le, C0:1s11eration at s'.l:h ~.c.h_ar.~e r' ns ca'L:ter. t~. th~ ~~eser.t d_ev.e!Q~m(;nt ;;lan.. Furth r:;:ore, we believe that these pri:::e asr:::...l ':'.;ral l:l_.,da ar-e a ;~ec:ous, !lnite resour-ce and should be ;reserved as such. ~e call on ~~e Eoard to aid i- -~ ~ - --a-ar")."1.'"...- '. ...~ ."...,::) . ., ........ , o. . )1L ;zZ ~~/:_ :L ,ll& .,~~r: L:: 6.LU: .,~_ !~~;;(- (u~L. f/~~;t,'~ _i. -- --------.-----"---.--7 - " .J:.~'-'-': __._ ':::~~ '_ '"") /~I ~'c..!.e?::-; ~ '- j' h 1. ., .... J. !l-. 3. ':.Ii.' , ' ,. . _ c~;:. {,..-~ J.~,'f r---"~ J ( , 7. ( &t..:tL/u. t1~c.<-_ ._-..-------_..~ . -~_';('.l. ~__. I' J I. II A? n ~2..-L 1/ --tJ;: >?1.y I, II . . To q .ote f.o~ the p.esent Jeve jated 5e;t ~:e~ 14, 1978, ~age 12, a .cent ?lan or ~he ~O.;. of :oIJt~Q:d, :1e1&2, "?os l. tl.ve ~eas=es sho,",.l.<1 be taken to ass,",re that land now n agricultu.al useage should .emain in such use to. as =~\l year to come as possible....Major .esldentia1 d~velo;ment should te d'.ected to the south or ~oute 25. and along a nar.ow st.l.p on t: e no.th sho.e abutting :'ong Island Sound." .'1e. he ul'lde.signed. petl tlon The 50uthold Town 30ard to disa;p.ove or a zoning c ange f.om residential-agricultu.al to multiple housing for "5eac.oft". a 47 ac~.~ tield just no.th of Cutchogue. Consideration ot Sl.:c'l :! .char'b.e .' ns COll."1:er~ to_ the p-E"esent d_evalo;ment "lan. ~ore. we believe that these pri=.e agricultural 1~.d3 are a ;rec:ous. inite .esou!"ce and s~ould be ;reserved as such. ~e call en ~'le 30ard to aid t~ -",,:- ". ......J ::"e3er~.':l ~io~. ~ . . . )::J ""-' , n. 2. ~ .'i'~ J. ?h. 4. ~Jl'Il' \...... MI" l" __ , o. 4'2.. c....... 4~~~p]lt~/J ''-'h,L>-~-' ~j.J}.'1-:_ ./ ~/ j.,.(,d:'u. ~?(HA4U!: -6: ~ ~~-.L ':'J SiejKC\. ~1. lfJd /Jl1ft1</ '~C ~2-<- _ __~{ {~~i ~ I~ ~(lt+hO Ii. h ~ :-1?ti;:;Z~'~A~Pwf ~ :0. '-' ~~b Sollct I!() -I. ......... . To qy te from the pres. dated Septe ter 14, 1976, pat . ~velo;:Qlent ?1a.."'1 ot !he -:owr~ or ':c!.lth.J:d, J., artlcle 1 & 2, new i years be di on th "?ositive measures shoyld oe take:1 to assure that land agricYltural useage shoyld re~ain in such use for as ~ar~ to come as pOssible....Major residential development should ected to the south of Route 25, and along a narrow strip north shore abutting ::'ong Isla:1d 3o'.md." ;'le, t e undersigned. petition ~e Southeld Town Board to disap;Jrove of a zJning ch ge from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for ""eacroft", a 47 acre field j'.Jst north of Cutchog'.Je. C0:1s1det"ation of such _. ~..c.h_ane;.e t"'. s cOIL:.::er. t~ th~ ~.!esent develo;ment plan. rmore, we believe that these pri~e asri~ultural l~~ds ~t"e a nite resource and should be ;t"eset"ved a3 ~uch. ~e call on ~he 3out"'.01d . 30ard to aid ;~ ......: - '. _-.J ~re::;er'.'.:l ~i.:::. 1. ~ n'(/. tf 2. 7. t> / ('" .' / /' , ~ '. - '/ - ..J /;.- " ./ , ("'-.Jtrt- (-;~1e1:_?~ .1/ r- 11. 12. t). .4. ,5. .6. .7. 8. . . : To q ote frolll the present Develoj:cent ?Ian at "he Tor.-. o! :;;OI.Hho::i, :ia~e1 3e;t ~te~ 14, 1978, page 12, article 1 & 2, "Positive measures should b. taken to assure that land now 'n agricultural useage should remain in such use tor as ma~ year to come as pOssible....Major residential development should te directed to the south at Route 25, and along a narrow strip on t e north shore abutting :ong Island 30'41d." ;~e, t.e under-signed, petition The 30utholJ Town coard to disappr-ove of a zoning ch nge from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "Seacraft", a 47 aCE"~ field just north of Cutcho€;Ue. CO:'1sider-ation at such _ J...~h_an~e r' s cOll..,-ter. t~. the ~r~sent d.evelo;mont ;;lan. ~urth :-more, we believe that these pri~e agricultural 1~,j5 are a ni te reSO'-lr-ce and should be ;:reser-vad a3 such. :;e call en ~'1e 30uthold ., 90ard to aid ; ~ ..",,: - . ~J 1. :3 . 9. 10. 11. 12. - r-O , 6. 7. ~ ;r-e;;er....:l ': L:::. I' " " ------_._-_.~. " . 1 . h ,,) (', h r , f) r.r;-Ct'..M../a.....-., -"". ',--,-,,-. ~/ C J~St...e..~~~ , ) } f7C': ox!; C.._'1:d...x..... /Jl I:.e J f//'Dw~'~t:. E1.,~ IIn"-r:.t~/( / 11 ~~ Cc;l-c.~ M . a '- /.~___ __ _~ .It . . rl / / ' ;- ~ ,f-I ( !~~ I) %~( ~y;;.l.ru<. .. d.rt /c. '-/fIe/' /,/.. c..~/ c.4 ,1,-///(' ~ . . ~:J q~ ~e from tr.e ;~esent ~eve i~:ej 3e~te :er 14, 1773, ~age 12, e ~!:~:'\t .-lan of 7t:e 70wn cl~ 1 & 2, ":C"","'::-: ):d, "?ositive measures sho'.lld 1::e taken to as'3ur~ tr.at lan::!. r_c.... i. agricul':'lral useage s:J.o.ld re::Jain in such I.,;se for as ::J~.:J years to come as ~ossl;le....MaJor residential develo;ment s~ou11 te di ected to the south of ~oute 25, and along a narro... strip 0:'\ ::-. r.or1:h shore ab'.lttlng ~ong Isl~nj 30'....-:j," .Ie. t: e unde:-s19:1ed, petition I'he 30Li'::!101J J:'oom ;:oard to disap;C'o"e of ? z2ning ch nge from residential-agricultural to multiple hcusi~~ for "3e:;,,:roft", i:,7 acre field bst north of Cutcho,T'.le. Consi.:J.erati.:m of S:':~'1 . - - c....-... -~ rl.l - o"'''..........e,.. ........ .''''11..:1. .....-Qse~.. dev"l---C"i"'"l- -'an ~.. ....:....6.~ - . ~ .........~... - ...... "'I,... ~..- ..... _ ;,J=-1..I.:._.LU.t-..... . :-"..::-:::--. t'~'Jre. we :eli~ye ti'!.at these prlr::e a~':'';1.41 t'...:-al l:l:".j,3 3.:'"'~ a . ~''5''':: ')1.,5, f"!':.2. ta rgs':L.l~-.:e a:-.d s~ot!ld ba :;:"~s~:-ved a.3 ::u~~. ':f"e l,:~'ll. C~ :''"!e - - '.-- --- --- -. .-. .~0;l~~=:j :~~~ 3oa~~ ~'J ~tj ;.. ~h:~ :ra~~r~:~i~~. =""'----.----- _. 7 --- t/ttk_ ~ft--';'-' 13. . , lLw ~}- " G.JJ'='J/~ {?tl F/"~~,(J~/ ft-<~~7~ e cJle-._f&'."-p.~-~-~-~'7,f'^'- - Uf~J/1~~(L__u f'. ~L~t~ ~ _ Ct", h ' - ~ ~ -~--;r--- ___. ~(~k'fJ tiaUu<- ? - ,CJ! ~~-- 71~ ~J.~C~'t"-:~ ~_ _..~ .._____ ,-: 7G- i( v J ". !Clo.. ,) ~~________ _____.____ ~fYl~J-r~jl . /i. {~r:! U<- .G , ,. >J. --._.._~ J. ~'O~01 ~~. s. I. ------------ ) , ,- , ; l. '-Yl. /} . " . ,.' 70 q ote frolD the prese:'", 197d, 1=ag~ date1 3e;t ~ter 14, . 3velop=ent ~lan of .he rown of Southo:d. , artiele 1 & 2, .Positive meas~e~ should be taken to assu~e that land new n agricultural useage should remain in such use for as ~any year to come as pOssible....Major residential develo1=cent should be d rected to the south of Route 25. ~~d along a narrow strip on t. e north shore abutting Long Isla.'1d SO'.lnd." .~e, he undersigned, peti tion ~e Southald Town 30ard to dlsap;lrove of a zoning c ange from residential-agricultural to multiple housing for "3ea~roft' a 47 ac_r.e field just north of Cutchogue. CO:1sideration of such '. J...c.h_a.'16:~ r' ns cOIL,':er. to_.th~ ~_t:esent de'lelopm~mt p13.r." ?urt er~ore, we believe that these pri=e agr~cultu~al lands are a ;rec_ous, inlte resource and should be Freserved as zuch. ~e call on ~~e 3o~t~old =c~j to aid ;~ ~~~3 ~~e3erva~i~~. 1. ,// 2. j J. 4. 6. 7. B. 9. 1,) . 11. 12. " 1J. L4. VJ.l~~_ ~ '~'- L~'7-____ ~ ~5. 6. ,?-. . /1" / D t 1 tJ/ d ....,... k....t'",- /& ~~ ':I - , , l' I ~ , { r--!. J~~11 /}, C:ti'7-4.2- DT,I!d ) CtJ:zIu;J~ (' ..d:<..-IU-r; < f..~~ (/ .-n&: .:----'_ )7. L/. v yv/ /1 / /1 k"...-_~/ ex; ? ?-&~ ~ . . .. \ To uo'::e from the pres.nt uev.lo;a:ent ?lan ot Th. Town ot ';;outh:>:d, 1atej Se; eQte~ 14, 1978, page 12. article 1 & 2, "?ositiv. m.asures should be taken to assure that land new 11. a~icultural useag. should re~ain in such us. tor as lIIa~ year to come as possibl.....Major residential develo;cent should be d rected to the south ot Route 25, and along a narrow strip on t e north shore abutting :'ong Isla.r'ld Sound." ~e, he undersigned, petition The Southold Town Board to disapprove ot a zoning c ange trom residential-agricultural to multiple housi~g tor "Seacroft" a 47 aCIe field just north of Cutchogue. Consi.jeration ot such _ :J.. .c.han~e r .ns COtl.:"'!~er _ t~_ t~~ pr!,!sent d.ev;la;ment plan._ ?urt e~ore. we believe that these pri~e agrl~ultural l~~ds ar9 a ::r9c :0\.19, ini te reSO\..irce and should be ;:~eserved as such. ;;. c'all or. :'''le Southold T .~ 30arj t':o <!S_; d ~_.. ~'h: - --e-e,...'......!j-.., '" ~ '. ...~ .'" ~ ...... .;~""".... 1. ,. 1;. - le- A': '-""'L. -:J ~ ~lZ~ 2. ;2&2<-~ d ~J ~~.h<-.{.....-ed-~ ~~. ~ J. "'1~ ;-v~.~ J A;'. t/ v 6. 7. Q v. !-'-'~k~. 10. ~ 11. 12 4. b4ll ~~~~ '( }\~ ~ -..L t.... ax 1). 17. < it p~ - )~ A.-. 77-( /.; 16. ~ . . .\' t To q o~e tr02 the present Jevelopment ?Ian of ~he ~own of '::outho:'d, jatej Sept mbe~ 14. 1978. page 12. article 1 & 2~ "Positive measures should be taken to ass~re that land n agricultural useage should remain in such use for as m~~ to come as pOssible....MaJor residential development should rected to the south of Route 25. and along a narrow strip e north shore abutting ::'ong Isla;1d 3o'-'!'.d." new year be d on t ~e. he undersigned. petition The Southold Town Board to disapprove of a zoning c ange from residential-agricuLtural to multiple housing for ":.ieacroft" a 47 ac~~ field just north ot Cutchogue. Consideration of such ~ chan~e r' ...5 COII.,:;e.r_ to_ the p_resent d.evelo;ment plan.. :urtr. ~ore. we believe that these pri=e agrlcul:ural I~~js are a ::,~'ec: :>''':S, . ni te resource and should be ~reservej 303 such. '"e call or. :'>te l2. ~ ----.. lJ. It .4. " 5. I . 6. 7. , I. : \\ .. ..., . ~h~3 ]re3er~atl~~. 1. c.ft. '. ~. -. _....t2 t?~t/? k,k; ~ ----------~- ~-- ., - . 3. 6. 1 " ---.- ", .. ., .'.,\ i!'A . . r To q ote tr'Oal 1atej Se;t ~~er 14, the pr'.sent 1978, pa~ 'elopa:ent <'La."! ot "he Tow:'! or Sc , lLr'ticle 1 & 2, !lo:d, -Po.itive measures should be taken to assur'1 that land agricultural useag. should re~ain in such ule tor' as ~a.~ year to come al Pos.lbl.....MaJor residential developoent should be dlr'ected to the south ot Route 25, and along a narro. strip on th north shor'! abutting Song Isla."Id Sound.- e undersigned, petition The Southold Town Board to dlsap~r'ove of a z:n1ng ch 6' tr'om residential-agricultural to multiple housin6 tor "Seaer'oft-, a 41 aCI~ tield just north ot, Cutchog'.Je. Conside~ation or s'-"cn a chan6e r" s CO'4,~er to the present develofment plan. . ---- . - ..... - -.-..--- . .... --- - --.. Purth rmor'e, we believe that these pri=e a~icultural l~,ds a~e a ?rec 10'.11, r n1 te resource and should be preserved a3 $uch. >i. cai 1 on ~'le 30uthold To' '. 30a.:-d to aid l" t"~:; ::raser'f:J.ti:J!1. ! r ' . .' .' /~/:... --":' , , " 'LA.. ~ I ;: Ii.... .j f 7 (~~7.~ II 1. ~ . I f), ~ ' I 'LiL'-', '_ .., ...._..L. ~ ./ / , , J. 7. 3. l. .0. 1. 2. I f( L.:' I J. ~. '7'1~ - , . . C'_,_ -, 5. 5. r~ 50 nJ P, ~ I? L , .:/ ,'/....i So\.! I h~ <} ... t, /1, _t", / I / J...A" - ' u~-:._: " ,. ,~t'/..~ ~r 'C~I-r. J~, ~ c\.c '\ ------ ,. ~/,.p.,c) /' . - ') /J ,... .J.).., .--.. 't.<..."'-""''''''C ,'~ 1 Iv' \. Ill;;1'/'; To..t r /c If..- }':.~J: G~~ VI 4.L,.( rl- m,o,;.". ~Co.6 . ....