Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-03/12/1970 .... lApp Southold Town Board o eals 13EIUTHI3LD, L. I., N. Y. 119~?1 Telephone 765-2660 APPEAL BOARD MEMBER Robert W. Gillispi¢~ Jr., Chairman Robert Bergen Charles Grigonls, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Fred Hulse, Jr. MINUTES SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS March 12, 1970 A regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals was held at7:30 P.M., Thursday, March 12~ 1970, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York. There were present: Messrs: Robert W. Gillispie, Jr.,. Chairman; Robert Bergen; Charles Grigonis, Jr. Absent: Messrs: Serge Doyen~ Jr., Fred Hulse~ Jr. Also present: Howard Terry, Building Inspector PUBLtC P~&~R/~G: Appeal No. 1318 -- 7:30 P.M. (E~'S~T.)~ upon application of Frank Carlin, Main Road, Mattituck, New York, for a variance in 'accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, A~ticle III~ Section 303, and Article Xa Section 1000A, for permission to se~ off lot with less than 100ft. frontage. Location of property: south side of Main Road, Laurel, New York, bounded north byMain Road~. east by C. Kosloski,~south by Railroad~ west by C. Kosloski. Fee paid $5.00. ~ ~ Southold Town Board~ uf Appeals -2- -' March 12~ 1970 Upon request' of the applicant~ the preceding application was withdrawn pursuant to telephone call received ~from him on March 12~ 1970. Letter acknowledging his request~was sent to him and $5.00 filing fee was returned. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1317 - 7:45 P.'M. (E.~S2T~)~ upon application of Edwin H. King~ Main Road, Orient~.New York~ for approval of access over private right-of-way in accordance with the State of New York Town Law, Section 280A. Location of Property: private right-of-way off south side of Main Road, Orient, New York, bounded north byMain Road, east by land of King, south by meadow and marsh~ west by land of King. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for approval of access, legal notice of hearing~ affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper~ and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who Wishes to speak for this application? IRVING L. PRICE:, J~'~ ESQ'.: Yes~ my name is Irving L. Price~ Jr.~. Attorneya 238 Main Street, Greenport~ New York. I am appearing on behalf of Edwin H. King. I urge the granting of this variance for the reasons advanced in the petition. I will De glad to answer any questions and I observe my right to answer any objections that may be brought up. THE CHAIRMAN: Do we have the map of the property as layed out in 1962 by VanTuyl? (The map was presented to the Chairman) I would like to make it clear that this'is not an approved filed map. This map of the property was laid out by Van Tuyl in 1962~ but the applicant never applied for approval. I am familiar with the lot under discussion. This is the section of his property for which he applied to the Planning Board for a minor subdivision of 4 lots,~ and his application was denied on January 12a 1970~' on the grounSs that the applicant owns a parcel of land of approximately 12 acres - and should file for a major subdivision. The Planning Board would not allow him to set off a minor subdivision of 4 lots when he .owns such a large amount of the surrounding land. According to this map~ the lot under discussion would be the lot marked as lot IRVING L; PRICE:~ O'R~', ESQ.': It is our position that there is no basis under New York State LaW for the so called requirement of a minor subdivision..It is unconstitutional. It deprives a man of his property without due process~ and violates his equal rights. ~ % Southold Town Boar~-~of Appeals -3- ~ March 12~ TRE CHAIRM~N: Minor subdivisions are something I am not expert on. The Planning Board has jurisdiction over minor su] It appears to me that the applicant is the owner of a tract oz property which he proposes to subdivide and sell off lOts on.~ In fact, he has already done this. The first lot fronting on Route 25, he has deeded to Vera & Tug Wilson. The present requirement for subdividing property is 40,.000sq. ft. of area per lot on property which does not have public water and sewerages, with public water and sewerage ~0,000sq. ltl This is a County Board of Health requirement which is being imposed all over the Town. In view of thisa it appears to me that the purpose of this application is to defeat the purpose of the County Board of Health and the Subdivision Regulations. IRVING L% PRICE, ~R~,i ESQ%: Well,. let me recapitulate,~ if you will~ is it your position that under Section 280A of the Town Law... ? THE CHAIRMAN: I have the Town Law,. Section 280A right here, I wili read it. "Permits for buildings nob on improved mapped streets~." Now this is an improved street~ but it is not a mapped street. But it is in fact a better access than many accesses we have approved in the past,~ an access does not have to be 50ft. to be legal. Section 280A reads as follows~ 1. "No permit for the erection of any building shall be issued unless a street or highway giving access to such proposed structure has been duly placed on the official map or plan, or if there be no official map or plan~ unless such street, or highway is (a) an existing state~ county,, or town highway, ~hairman: which this is not) ~b) a street shown upon a plat approved by the planning board as provided in sections two hundred seventy-six and two hundred seventy-seven .of this article,, as in effect at the time such plat was approved,. ~hairman: which this is not) (c) a street on a plat duly filed and recorded in the office of the county clerk or register prior to the appointment of such planning board and the grant to such board of the power to approve plats. ~hairman: which does not apply to this.) IRVING L~ PRICE~ 'JRt% ES~': We are applying under Section subsection 3. THE CHAIRMA/~: All righta I will read Section 3. 3. "Where the enforcement of the provisions of this section would entail practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship~ or where the circum- stances of the case do not require the structure to be related to exist- ing .or proposed streets or highways~ the applicant for such a permit may appeal from the decision of the administrative officer having charge of theissue of-permits to the board of appeals or other similar board, in any town which has established a board having power to make'variances or exceptions in zoning regulations, and the same provisions are hereby applied to such appeals and to such board as are provided in case's of appeals on zoning regulations. The board may in passing on such appeal make any reasonable exception and issue the permit subject to conditions ~' '~ Southold Town Boar? ~f Appeals ~- March 12, 1970 that will protect any future street or highway layout. Any such decision shall be subject to review by certiorari order issued out of a special term of the supreme court in the same manner and pursuant to the same provisions as in appeals from the decisions of such bo~d upon zoning regulations." THE CHAIRMAN: Now, this is the paragraph that concerns the application, right? IRVING L% PRICE,,. JR.:, ESQ.~: Yes, thates right. THE CHAIRMAN: Well, then you can take it from here. IRVING L~' PRICE~ JR.% ES~j: Wella I have expressed my personal view,, but I may be wrong, of course. THE CHAIRMAN: My personal view is that this is an obvious attempt to defeat the Subdivision Regulations. IRVING L. PRICE, JR.'., ESQ,: I take exception to the statement of the Chairman of the Board, when he says that it is an obvious attempt to avoid the zoning laws. It is merely an application under Sec. 280A subsection 3 of the Town Law. And if I understand your position that the requirement of Sec. 315-5 to 354-a of the Town Law, which requires any subdivision map to be filed in the County Clerk's Office as a condition to the granting of the right of access under Section 280A of the Town Law,~ I submit that it is incorrect and that it has already been decided by the Supreme Court of the State of New York in the case of Jack Homes, Inc. vs. Baldwina which is a case involving the Hempstead Town Board of Appeals which the Court held the requirements for filing a subdivision map under the Real PropertY Law is merely to make a public record of the map for sake of definite certainty. The penalty for failure to comply with the statute is contained within this provision and the only penalty s9 specified is the fine therein contained, and if the Board of Appeals as a condition of granting access under Section 280A requires the filing of a subdivision map.......... THE CHAIRMAN: No, that is incorrect. That is not our position. IRVING L~' PRICE,iJR~'~ ESQ,: Then I donet understand your position. THE CHAIRMAN: Well, our stand is that the man has property which he has divided, this is evidence taken from the map. He is selling property from this map, he has deeded property from thismapo This property is described by this map. IRVING L.' PRICE~iJR~:, ESQ.: I see no proof that he sold from that map. THE CHAIRMAN: Wella what is the description of the property then? · $outhold Town Board~ ~f Appeals -5- '' March 12, 1970 Irving L. Pricer Jr., Esq. read a description of the property as prepared by Van Tuyl & Son, dated January 5a 1970. THE CHAIRMAN: It is my opinion that this description coinc~ides with the exact lines of this survey of 1962, revised April 1969. IRVING L. PRICE,' JR.'i~ ES~': It is not a surveya it is a map. THE CHAIRMAN: Well, then it coincides with the descriptioni of the map, so far as I am personally concerned. Yourare perfectly entitled to hear from the other members of the Board on this.a Mrs. Price. IRVING L% PRICE, JR.~ ESQ,: No:, I just want the records straight when I appeal this. And I would like the record to show that there is another application before the Board tonight ~at a later date or later time, for the same sort of relief as asked in the case of Edwin H. King,. in which case the access is over an unimproved 8~ ft. right-of-wlay on property of other persons, rather than the owner himself, as in this case° THE CHAIRMAN: In my opinion,, as Chairman of the Board, this is irrelevant. IRVING L~ PRICE, JR.~,. ESQj: Sometime in July~ April,. or early spring of this year, permission was granted for the same sort of relief on the same 8~ft. right-of-way for a converted school house which was some 2~000 ft. from the road over this right-of-way. THE CHAIRMAN: Correct. I think it is irrelevant, but it is a correct statement. THE CHAIP~W~N: Is there anyone else who wishes to speak for this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else present who wishes 'to speak against this application, aside from the~objections I have already given? M~ BERGEN: The map which Mr. Price brought in follows the map we have here very closely. IRVING L2 PRICEi~JR., ESQ.: I submit, Mr. Bergen,. that hundreds of prospective maps have been made in this Town,. none of whichhave been sold from and none of which have ever been finalized in the form in which they were made. It is a common practice for someone to buy an acreage and 'then get Van Tuyl to try to fit a road on it and make up a map with lots that could be sold. It does not mean he is selling from it. '~ Southold Town Boar~f Appeals -6- -~~~mrch 12, 1970 THE CHAIRMAN: This is correct. Are there any further questions? (~here was no response.) THECHAIRMAN: I would like to postpone decision on this so that I can consult the Town Counsel~ because as you have so affably pointed out~ I may be wrong. My own personal impression of this is that it is an attempt to defeat the planning concept of subdivisions. MR. GRIGONIS: The question comes into my mind whether or not we have any right to try to guess what his intentions are. Technically I guess he is within his rights, but I don't know what we can do in regards to this appeal. THE CHAIPuV~/~: Well~ if he is not within his rights,~ the Town Counsel will have to defend our actions, but if he is within his rights, then the appeal should be granted. MR.' CAMERON Cj COOK: My name is Cameron C. Cook,. I would like to say something,, if I may? I have known Mr. King for quite some time and I know this piece of property and I also know-that in 1969 he had it all planned according to the regulations at that time. I don~t think he has any intent of doing anything incorrect as far as the zoning is concerned. THE CHAIRMAN: What we are 'con6~n~d with is the County regulations which require 40,000sq. ft. of area per lot where there is no public water and sewerages, and 20,000sq. ft. of area per lot in subdivisions where there is public water~ and sewerage. Our main concern is water~ we are trying to control our water supply so as to prevent a shortage of water. The County's definition of a subdivision is more than 4 lots, that is not the State's definition~ I have never been able to get a clear picture of.just what the state definition is. MR. ~RON Cj COOK: I believe the current definition of a subdivision in the Supreme Court is anything over 5 lots,, anything under 5 is not. THE CHAIRMAN: In the Town of Southold we have Minor Subdivision Regulations, Which is 4 lots and under. MR. CAMERON Cj COOK: Well, I concur it is kind of progressive. THE CHAIRMAN: The trend in zoning is to decrease-density, Water is the problematong with a lot of other related problems. THE CHAIRMAN: Mr. Price has indicated that he will appeal this~ if it is denied, so I would like to postpone the decision on this so that we can confer with the Town Attorney,. Mr. Tasker and possibly work out a suitable solution. ' '~ ~ $outhold Town Boar---of Appeals -7- --- March 12, 1970 On motion by Mr. Gillispie,~ seconded by Mr. Bergen,. it was RESOLVED'that the Southold Town Board of Appeals postpone decision on Appeal No. 1317 Edwin H. King for' approval of access .over private right-of-way located off south side of Main Road, Orient· NjYja so that the Board may investigate the matter further. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie~. Bergen~ Grigonis. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1316-- 8:00 PjM%- (E.'S,T~)~ upon application of Phillip Bellamore, 1400 East Drive~. North Merrick, New York, for approval of access over private right-of-way in accordance with the State of New York Town~Law~ Section 288A. Location of property: private right-of-way along southerly line of Lot K~ Map No. 41 Shore Acresa Mattituck~ New York. Fee paid $5.00, The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for approval of access,~ legal notice of hearinga affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper,~ and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? MR~ PHILLIP BELLAMORE: I am Mr. Bellamore. THE CHAIRMAN: You are the owner of the property? MR. PHILLIP BELLAMORE: I am in the process of buying it. CHAIRMAN: What is the size©of the property, acreage wise? HOWARD TERRY~BUILDING INSPECTOR: One lot will be 280ft. deep, and the other one will be 360ft. deep. THE CHAIRMAN: How wide is it? MR-. BELLAMORE: It is 90ft. wide. THE CHAIRMAN: That would be a total area of 57,600sq. ft. The access will be on the southerly~property line. Is he also proposing to divide-the property in this application? HOWARD TERRY: He doesn't need anything on that, all he needs is approval of access. Each of the lots will be in excess of the minimum required square footage of area. -4 Southold Town Boar~ ~f Appeals -8- March 12:~ 1970 The Chairman inspected sketch of 'the property by Van Tuyl dated February 9~. 1970, brought in by F~r. Bellamore. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else present who wishes to speak for this application? (There was no response,) THE CHAIRMAN: Does anyone have any further questions? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests approval of access over private right-of-way in accordance'with New York State Town Lawa Section 280A. The applicant is the o~ner (under contract) of Lot K on map of Shore Acres~ which is an oversize lot on an approved map with an area of 57~600sqo feet. Applicant proposes to divide lot~ as shown on sketch by Van Tuyl dated February 9, 1970, and construct second dwelling. Proposed right-of-way will be 15 ft. in width. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not-be shared by all properties alike inthe immediate vicinity of this property and in the Same. use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neigtuborhood~ and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motionbyFlr. Bergen~ seconded by Mr. Grigonis~ It was RESOLVED Phillip Bellamore,~ 1400 East Drivew North Merrick,~ New York,. be G~ approval of access over private right-of-way as applied for. Location of property: private right-of-way~ located off east side'of North Lane ~Pvt. Road), along southerly property line of Lot K Map of Shore Acres, Mattituck% New York. This approval of access is grantedsubject to the following conditions: 1o Right-of--way must be at least 15 feet in width and improved to the approval of the Building Inspector. 2. Lot K must be divided as shown on sketch by Van Tuyl dated February 9~ 1970~ Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs: Gillispiea Bergen~ Grigonis~ PUBLIC ~P~RING: Appeal No. 1319 - 8:15 P~M.~ (E~S'.'T~)~ upon application of George C. Cook,. Jr.~. 1133 Broadwaya New York, N~YJ 10010,~ for approval of access over private right-of-way in accordance w ith the State of New York Town Law~ Section 280A. Location of '- Southold Town Board~kf Appeals -9- March 12s. 1970 property: private right-of-way off north side of Main Roads. East Marion,, New York, bounded .north by L~Io' Sound,. east by Cowan,~ Brown & others, south by Main Road~: west by Schaefer Estate. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the applicati°n for approval of access~ legal notice of hearings, affidavit attesting ~to its publication in the official newspaper~ a~d notice to the applicant. The Chairman inspected survey of property made by Van Tuyl & Son ~ated July 15~ 1965. THE CHAIRMAN: The area of the lot on which the applicant proposes to construct a dwelling is 22,.000sq. ft. The right-of-way is 8.32 ft. Wide at the entrance at Cowan~s monument. Does this sketch show where the house will be located? GE~RGEC~ COO~ JR%~: Yes~ it will be located in the center of the lot~. setback 50ft. from the right-of-way. THE CHAIRMA/~: The property to the north of thiss~ is owned by yourself? GEORGE C2 COOK, JR%': Yes, I own 1½ to 2 acres north of the sand pit, and about 10 to 12 acres west of the right--of-way° THE' CHAIRMAN: This right-of-way widens out as it goes along, doesn't it? GEORGE C. COOK, JRt-: Yes~, It goes from 16 ft. to 22 ft, THE CHAIRMAN: This house will be for your own use? GEORGE C: COOK,,. JR.: Yese. it is. THE CHAIRMAN: And the other land youhope someday to get access to so that you can sell it off or develop it? GEORGE C~ COOK~ JRj: Yes~ that's right. THE CHAIRMA5~: It is my opinionthat~ in this particular case to deny this application would be to deny"'~the applicant the use of his property. Although this is an incredibly narrow access.~, in fact the narrowest one that I know of in the Town. The Chairman read a portion of Section 280As. Subsection 3e as follows: "The board~ay in passing on such appeal make'any reasonable exception and issue the permit subject to conditions that will protect any future street or highway layout." '~ Southold Town Board"--~'f Appeals -10- March 12, 1970 THE CHAIRMAN: Well, I don't know of any conditions that we could impose that would protect any future street or highway layout. If there ever is a road through here, this is where it would be. HOWARD TERRY: If it ever had to be widened, you could cut off a little of his front yard and he would still have plenty of setback. THE CHAIRMAN: As I recollect,, we have inspected this pretty carefully a few times before, and this right-of-way is in fa~ly good condition up to the point where you propose to build. The bed of the road is solid. GEORGE C.' COOK:, JR.: I spoke to Mr. Van Tuyl and he said that he thought you people would approve this road, it would be all right for a single house to be put there. THE CHAIRMAN: It was the traffic situation which pressured the Semerjian application which was withdrawn the other day. The amount of traffic that might have been generated would have been fantastic. You would be denied any opportunity to develop your other property until such time as there is a decent access for it. GEORGE C.' COOK., JR.: Yes,. I understand this. THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any other questions ? Does anyone else wish to speak for this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: Is ~there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? ROBERT LONG: I don~t wish to speak against this application,. I am interested as an observer because I ~n the property to the west of this right-of-way. What does it state as ~the width of the right-of-way? THE CHAIRMAN: 8.32 feet. ROBERT LONG: O~'K., just as long as everybody realizes how wide it is, because you granted permission for that guy to ~ut the school house down-there and as soon as he got a contractor to come in there with his machines', he very carefully shoved all of my monuments over up in the front and moved everything about 10ft. so that he could come in there with his tractor and trailers,. then Ihad to move everything back again. THE CHAIRMAN: Well, you should have complained to him. Out of curiousity, just how much acreage do you own there? -' Southold Town Board~~ ~ Appeals -11- March 12,~ 1970 R~OBERT LONG: I don't know really~ it's about 12 acres,, including the farm land. THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any further questions? ~There was no responses) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests approval of access over private right-of-way in accordance with the State of New York Town Law, Section 280A. The Board finds that the applicant owns no road frontage on the Main Road. Since this is the only means of access the applicant has to his interior property~ the Board feels that to deny this application would be to deny the applicant the use of his property. A condition of granting this application is that the access shall be limited to one (1)., one family dwelling which the applicant ~roposes to construct 'for his own use as described on survey accompanying the application~ by Van Tuyl dated July 15~. ~965o The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie~ seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED George C. Cook~ Jri~ 1133 Broadway.,. New York,. NjYi' 10010~ be GRANTw~ approval of access over private right-of-way as applied for. Location of property: private right-of--way off north side of Main Road~,. East Marion,. New York, This approval is granted subject to the following condition: 1. This access shall be limited to one Cl~,~ one family dwelling which the applicant proposes to construct for his own use as described on survey by Van Tuyl dated July 15,. 1965. Vote of the Board: Ayes:--Messrs: Gillispie,. Bergen,. Grigonis. On motion by Mr. Gillispie~ seconded by Mr. Grigonis~ it was RESOLVED that the minutes of the Southold Town Board of Appeals dated February 19~. 1970~. be approved as submitted. Vote of the Board: Ayes:-- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen~ Grigonis. ~ Southold Town Boar(~r~f Appeals --12- March 12, 1970 On motion by Fzr. Gillispie,. seconded by Mr. Bergen,, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:30 P,M. ~.'S~T~),, Thursday, April 2, 1970, at the Town Officew~ Main Road,, Southold, New York~ as the time and place of hearing upon application of H~ry Mazzaferro, Sr.,, 421 Front Street,. Greenporta New York,1 for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,~ Article III~ Section 303~ and Article X,, Section 1000Aa for permission to divide property and set off lot with less than 100ft. frontage. Location of property: north side of Custer Avenue,~ Southold~ New York~ bounded north by J. Lowe-J~Wl~ Wilkinson,, east by Robert Wilkinson~, south by Custer Avenue~ west by Chas. Gageno Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie~ Bergen,, Grigoniso~ On motion by Mr. Grigonis'~, seconded by blro Gillispie~ it was RESOLV~ that the Southold ToWn Board of Appeals set 7:45 P.M. (E~S.'T%)~ Thursday~ April 2~ 1970, at the Town Office~ Main Road,, Southold~ New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of David Eli~zar, 1788 Roland Avenue, Wantagh~, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,. Article IV, Section 408~ Subsection ~)~, for permissiontto erect an off premises direction- al sign on property of Malcolm P. Rackett. Location of property: corner of Main Street and Champlin Place, Greenport~ New YOrkla bounded north by M~'F. Straussner~. east by C. Cisterino,. south by Champlin Place, west by Main Street. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie,~. Bergen,. Grigoniso On motion by Mr. Bergen~ seconded by Mr. Grigonis,, it was RESOLVED that.the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:00 P.M, ~E~'S~'T~)~ Thursday, April 2,~ 1970~ at the Town Office., Main Southold,~ New York,, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Mattituck Inlet Marina & Shipyard,~ Inc.,, Mil1 Road, MattitUck,, New York,~ for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance~ Article III~ Section 300~ Subsection 10a for permission to erect an off premises directional sign on property of Walter Gatz. Location ofproperty: north side of Sound Avenue~Mattituck, New York, bounded north by J. Wierbecke~ east by Bergen Avenue~ south by Sound Avenue~ west by J. Koroleski. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie,. Bergen,, Grigonis. ~ Southold Town Boar/ ~f Appeals -13- March 12~ 1970 On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis,. it was RESOLVED that the Southold ToWn Board of Appeals set 8:10 (E%'S~-T%-),. Thursday,. April 2,. 1970,. at the Town Office,~ Main Road, Southold,. New York, as the time and place of hearing UPon application of Mattituck Inlet-Marina & Shipyard, Inc., Mill Road, Mattituck, New York,. for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection (a), for permission to erect an off premises directional sign. Location of property: north side of MainRoad, Laurel~ New York,. bounded north by east by J. O~Connell-Kersnowski, south by Main Roada west by Matson. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen,. Grigonis. On motion by Mr. Grigonis~ seconded by Mr. Bergen,. it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town"'~oard of Appeals seth8:25 P%-M. (E.S.T,), Thursday~ April 2~ 19705 at the Town Office, Main Road~ Southold, New York~ as the ~ime and place of he~ing upon application of Lloyd Terry,~ Main Road, Orient,~ New York,. for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,~ Article X, Section 1000A, for permission to renew a farm labor camp permit granted April ~4~ 1969. Location of property: south side of Main Road, Orient, New York, bounded north by Main Road, east by S. Koroleski & others, south by the B~,.west by E. Latham. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie~, Bergen,. Grigonis. On motion by M_r. Bergen,. seconded by Mr. Gillispie~. it was RESOLVED that the Southold ToWn Board of Appeals set 8:35 ~E~'S~T~), Thursday, April 2~ 1970~ at the Town Office,~ Main Road~. Southold,. New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Clarence Powei1, Robinson Road,. Greenport,~ New York a/c Robert Melrose, Robinson Road,~ Greenport~. New York',. for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinances. Article III, Section 305, for permission to build new one family dwelling withreduced front yard setback. Location of property: south side of Robinson Road, Greenport~ New York, bounded north by Robinson Road, east by Stuart Dorman~ south by Sterling Creek, west by Clarence Powell. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen,~ Grigonis. $outhold Town Board -? Appeals -14- -~ March 124. 1970 The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P.M.