HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-97.-3-17 I
I
-i OWV,V C'F
I
r• a -
K/P' � R �•
tilt
u7V4 I y
100 JJO
DyLKP(ZSQN �� Il W - !'! • QYv'nlr:C7.9 � Pa VlD D. A E'L l2p HP. Thi Y'. i�h:F{NCYJ
V It
O b xEyNiAr�l ArZEFaI 3. 676
"TYOIG!}G" COY �"' - .�� ., �9 ^J• I 1pOo'c!"�
tiib?- O LL
W 0� rssr Ho<e ,t, l8_
97-
V' ud. � o � /, si(•'r.='•±1..L_ C4UNT`17.9X �Fr2L'li:� : /000- ,'? -: "S.:2Ili I 150.0 j 2. pg-ofP62TY /S ZoAiov 2 - 40.
•4'.d?"b"."a^"'E. :,� 3. TH6 WATtf&= Stlpp6Y ANa 6L'WR6E OrSPodR4 GAC74 Jt7.=.�.
F09 LOT.'. GN 7-H{5 MAf> COMJ�<.Y WJ7"H THC ,TrAI✓DAPDJ
ROLE
r+ pNa l2EgU/2G M6'/J'!'3 OP >"a{6' JUFFOLK- LOualT%
I � I WeLL � tou:E
U
GA}10 5URViZ'10Z
MO. Z56Z6
Zg
'It
'�U �' TO A DELL AlZATv OM of cOv NA1JT8 ANO KES 7.6rc TrON5
�` bk 1? n ' ,•3'Ah7U WXl GN gFFCCY' LOTS !.0 YFYJ,T 611f7PJVJbr{JN fdAS 69,57F/ WAlVBU.
$. I
flop
$ '
ll•A ..v G ¢ou ow'ik .
E` '
WC F76fL6dY CERTIFY THAT NO LOT AN TNrS MAG /S LE35 !
�_ _ -- T/{AN BO,Ol1a 58FT. !K Q/LC-'R THaT ZHIS MRN WAS MR4E j
N`, PlTLi.1.S pOL/NOA 8Y' /.J3 t4'UM ACTUAL SUl2V6Y5 Lama�Frro 6c7: 6 J992 ,
AOAO]t w'r 6.P. 14. ANG T}yA l' LONC.26TC !Y{O HUNJE eJ7'S FIa VL 1f 6'Br�/ 36'1" RT
O pa ngp 00lNTJ SNaWN TXUS: @]
-r:.�r+r,• , iT At. 7A4lK ____ _ 9 q(�(�
F-- APO20 VCU JYOV" _- 2 jqV-jHSZ 200CtZlCC VAN :!/YL� !? C.
I L_ _ 50UTN4LD TOWN PLANNlN680A.20 1��. �.e....%.....yQ
�_ j- - - -- - �T{ LICE'N BL-O LAND 5ux✓6 Y02.5 r
iv. Y.
'
p I I WHGL OOINY - � �
F Vy 5—YPVCAL WELL
'�� -- -- - - --� —� .Fe✓lSNEO GJLGa¢ � R -
Nh` DIVISION OF PUBIIC.NEAITH
r OEM OF NEAUH.SERVICES, SUFFOLK COUNT
NAUPPAUGE;N.Y. SS 10 1992 I
<,oCrclMG Ca.STlNC . f�1NJ;!NrrL 6.fAtl8 __
r--I Paver 1_-- _
p
FPLANNIIN:GRD
d'Y' MAx.+I ¢ h— -"I7e'MM.I°- � � "aeoaelar 6 rvm �- �N(2-000C SY6TdN} mw�vclia vuo=ocr�
j LLLJJJ 6,Ily thi,rae mmr ,•,e fit lith,
ann;o,a Fla Penvcon
p EIV m9;Novemn -
i I 8•
460 6AL. SAP77G TANrr.
Southold Town Planning Board 6 Novembe•, 1992
Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Ward?
Mr. Ward: No.
Mr. Orlowski: Mr. McDonald?
Mr. McDonald: No.
Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Edwards?
Mr. Edwards: No.
Mr. Orlowski: Ms. Scopaz?
Ms. Scopaz: No.
Mr. Orlowski: Being no further questions, I'll entertain a motion to close
the hearing.
Mr. Ward: So moved.
Mr. Latham: Second.
Mr. Bitses: Are we going to form a posse for her? Do I have to catch a
couple of Board members? (Laughter)
• Mr. Orlowski: All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
Mr. Orlowski: Moving on to the next order of business. David S. and
Elizabeth T. Branch -- This minor subdivision is for two lots on 3.676
acres located on the northwest corner of Eugene's Road and Skunk Lane
in Cutchogue. SC1'M# 1000--97--3-17 S. 18.2. We have proof of publication
in the local papers and at this time everything is in order for a final
hearing. I'll ask if there are any objections to this subdivision?
Hearing none, are there any endorsements of this subdivision?
Richard Lark: From Cutchogue. I represent the applicant. I think we've
complied with everything the Board has requested, except with the one item
which I asked the Board in it's final determination in granting approval, if
they would grant a waiver. And that's a request for a variance for your
regulations of 106-50 for the payment of the $2000.00 fee for the so called
vacant lot, under your rules 106--38 paragraph E , so substantial justice
can be done.
aY
Southold Town Planning Board 7 November 2, 1992
'• The property is zoned R--40 and contains a total of 3.6 acres, which you
could get easily, even with excluding a roadway inside 3 lots. But the
applicant has asked for only two. Further, the property is existing in
two lots right now, so we're really not creating a third lot. I think
that's important. It was at my request when the applicant came to me and
wanted to get their property straightened out so there wouldn't be a problem,
that I made the application for which you have the basic layout. Here's the
existing tax map and I've colored the two existing lots which conform to
your zoning map of R-40. The tax bills are two different tax bills for the
two different lots. One's assessed as a vacant, one's assessed with the
house on it. Instead of having a north/south orientation, which made it
awkward for everybody, I made it basically and east/west orientation, which
you have in the subdivision. So, keeping those things in mind, plus the
applicant, to date, has paid $3700.00 for the privilege of changing her lot
line, $2000.00 for a Planning Board fee, an environmental fee of $400.00,
the surveyors have charged her $1,050.00 because of some of the revisions
that the Board requested, which were reasonable, and then the Health Dept. ,
the test hole, and their fee which was $100.00 for the test hole and $1.50.00
for their application fee under Article 6.
So, considering that, it has become somewhat of a hardship for the applicant
and I think the Town has gotten the benefit out of this because, no doubt,
you'll have a restriction in there, which will be agreed to in advance, for
no future subdivision of this property, which it should be, and we end up
now with two lots which are properly laid out, rather than the two lots as
• they had purchased them, which would have made for an awkward layout, be-
cause it would have put a house in the back yard of people, which didn't
make any sense. So, that's why the request for the application and I
respectfully move that you approve the final subdivision and grant my
request for a waiver of the $2000.00 Park & Playground fee.
Mr. Ward: I don't believe that a waiver will be necessary.
Mr. Lark: Your planning staff required it, and when it came to my
at:.=ration, I said, "Oh my God, the regulations say that". . .
Mr. Ward: The regulations say it, but you're not creating it separate.
Mr. Lark: No, we're not, that's what I'm really asking, and pointing that
out. OK.
Mr. Orlowski: So, you're free there.
Mr. Lark: Hopefully.
Mr. Orlowski: Any other endorsements of this subdivision? Hearing none
out there neither pro nor con, but having information pertaining to this
subdivision that would be of interest to the Board? Any questions from
the Board -- Mr. Latham?
Mr. Latham: No.
1
Southold Town Planning Board 8 November 2, 1.992
Mr. Orlowski; Mr. Ward?
t
Mr. Ward: No.
Mr. Orlowski: Mr. McDonald?
Mr. McDonald: No.
Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Edwards?
Mr. Edwards: No.
Mr. Orlowski: Ms. Scopaz?
Ms. Scopaz: No.
Mr. Orlowski: Being no further questions, I'll entertain a motion to close
the hearing.
Mr. Latham: So moved.
Mr. Ward: Second.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. Does the Board have any pleasure?
Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman I'd like to offer the following resolution.
WHEREAS, David S. and Elizabeth T. Branch are the owners of the property
known and designated as SCPM# 1000•-97-3-17 & 18.2, located on the north-
west corner of Eugene's Road and Skunk Lane in Cutchogue; and
WHEREAS, this minor subdivision, to be ?mown as minor subdivision for David
S. and Elizabeth T. Branch, is for 2 lots on 3.676 acres; and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental
Quality Review Act, (Article 8) , Part 617, declared itself lead agency, and
issued a Negative Declaration on June 30, 1992; and
WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at
the Town Hall, Southold, New York on November 2, 1992; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of
Southold have been met; and be it therefore,
RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the
surveys dated October 6, 1992 and authorize the Chairman to endorse the
final surveys.
THIS MINOR SUBDIVISION IS FOR LOTS ON 3.676 ACRES LOCATED ON
12v�11„uest�orner a-p 04dili< f2a6+ -51294 wle IN ealthhye
SCTM# I000- 9'-7 - 3 - 'V7 *. 19'.2
1. MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD)
Complete application rece ed
A40-. ♦ �DJM✓5 ✓ 4Jn1
cca� ✓
07K
Applicant
Application reviewed at work session 5 a h
SOL OK
Applicant advised of necessary revisions —3 61vz P 3���1 yz by k&
Revised submission received sz It. ro.` oK
SOL OK
inro.
Sketch plan approval
-with conditions
Lead Agency Coordination 5119112.
SEQRA determination
Rz
Sent to Fire Commissioner 5� i Y q� apt
Receipt of firewell location.. 27 4�
Notification to applicant to include on final map �o we 11 "V%'nr.
Sent to County Planning Commission SB ro.` oK
Receipt of County Report IVpr �.` KK
Review of SCPC report /tl�
ml�y w5
Draft Covenants and Restrictions received07K
Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed c^ice . eK
Filed Covenants and Restrictions received 41ir
Receipt of mylars and paper prints with W
Health approval .
Final Public Hearing Z y2 c_l,"
Approval of subdivision ��z�9Z loy e�
-with conditions
Endorsement of subdivision it 2 L
ms i�i�/i u
y1z>)yz �kpm,ip�- ag JI4ou SAF ne.uia.0 �e•¢ , '
51N1yZ Sent ty GU
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT
To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold:
The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (teXeamxe4 (final) approval of a subdivision plat in
accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town
Planning Board, and represents and states as follows:
1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the
owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said
land under application.)
2. The name of the subdivision is to be . . 1izriOx .S.Ubd ,visipri , forDavid, S;
Branch and Elizabeth T. Branch
......... ........ . . ..... .. . . .. .... .. . . .. . . .. .. .. ...... .... . .. . . . . .. . . .. . .
3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed
suggested.)
4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as
follows:
Liber . .. . 9672 . .. .. . . .. . . .. . Page . .. .. 3.83.. .. . . . . . . . . . On . .. 1.1/7/84
EX)N'K. ... . . . .. .. ...... .. .....A'XXac . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . RSb . .... . . .. .. . . .... . . . . . . ,
lx*nt . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . ...... . . .fxxdc . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .... .. . .. . ;
Tb'ki a . . . .. .. ..... .. . . . . .... . . . 3'x'llm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. ... @dc . . . .. .. . . .... .. . . .. .. . . ;
]} a8c. ... . .. .. . . .. ...... .....:PXAW . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. .. ®lf
zsxtexketkgra�xx9rec8xXilkxfikXRk�f71>aai;dxc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . .
xM:�asXNMoibutm . . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .... . .
..... . .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. . . . . . .. .. . . .. .
5. The area of the land is . ..3; 6 7 6, , , , . ,, , acres.
6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have beenlaid wsmqw
gp
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ... .. . . .. .. . . . . .
7. The land ispncumbered by . �Pj
mortgage (s) xr,1xDoxzX . . . . . . . . .. .
(x}C}�idl[4 c RCXd714Y tt]d1SxT3�iffi84c . .. .. . . . . . . . . .A}CXDC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
P[�{X�7E@g2fdFF{
xR$. . . . . . . . . . . .. .xas add xmxx, c. . . .. . . . I . . :. . . . . . . . .XWW
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . xdbrm . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(� � SAcaceamdxdcamici4sex . .. . . . . . . 3a$ac. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. .
lx�
. . . . . cc4zidxwxoixm
_... .
xa . .. .. .. . . .. . . . .. . .
FEB 2 4 1992 `'
r
(x �cra�xsxmsa�X. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . ... . . x�
g�• • • •• • - •• wxigscf6)Kxmatmx
zit . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .x itCc�cacaare�Y . . . . . . .... . . . .. . . . . . . . ..W1 x
. .. .. ..... . .. .. .. . . ... . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . .... . . .
8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land *lip{
.. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. ... . . .... .. . . . . ... .. .. .
9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts Low-Density Residential
.. .. .. .. .. . .. .
R-40 District
. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . ............ . . . .
10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise,XX.
IKOPZ
. .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .... .. .. . . . . . . ... .
11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements.
12. The land (7 !m) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis-
trict, if within a District, is . . . . .N/A
. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. .
13./Water mains will be laid by . . .applicant.
. . . . . .
. . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ... .
x X X>ae9c xK1dKF cIGX1facF4X1r15K�1 Jq Xxiox.
No
14./Electric lines and standards will be installed by .appligant;, ,existing Lilco Service.
�tcnxsc
No
15./Gas mains will be installed by . ,applicant.
acedxXXxXA1pWt��43tX3GiFD#X�rx1Et2Spl;]C . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
'X�1FDtIG1isGX
16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the
Suffolk County IIighway system, annex Schedule "L"' hereto, to show same. N/A
17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by tile applicant applicant Ifo he existing public streets in the
ow vo�fnSoutholc I 9,111 ri Miic f t YYCKe i 7(1yT;rO°CSO �O_Ma E11 e &r,
atthere Janas7�hiv n 5VSy 'F; 1�8�1-��
l8. There are no exis[ing9buildings or structures on the land whick are not located and show n
on the plat.
19• Where the plat shutes propose<I streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining still-
01, maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said
rxistin{ neaps at their conjunctions with tlic proposed streets.
20. In the course of roj)c ty Lawiugs, the applicant Will offer proof of title as required by Sec.
335 of the kcal Property Law.
21. Submita copy of proposed deed for lots showin all restrictions, cotenants, etc. :annex
Schedule "D
22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be
$• .-R-... , as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the
Performance Bond be fixed at . .. ..Q. .. . . . . . years. The Performance Bond will be written by
a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Sche ule
DATE ... ..an .. .. ., (/.,.. ....., 199 . j /a<.
(Name of Applicant) Dav d S. Branch
axiiad�3iifYetj Elizabeth T. Branch
76 Laurel Road
New_Canaan, , Connecticut_ .06,840 ,, , ,, .
(Address)
CONNECTICUT
STATE OF 2MVAkX=,[COUNTY OF . . . ss:/ )
/. . . . . .t eme e
On the . . . .. . . . . . .. .. .. . day of. .. .. .. . . . . .. �'. . . . . . . .�. .. ., 19.9� . ., before me personally came
DAVID S. BRANCHand ELIZABETH T, to me known to be the individual9described in and who
BRANCH
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . . ey. .. . executed the same.
f' . . . . . . . . . .
Notary Public w2'
Cu�o(t'Pub�Qctu
March 31;193 41-
STATE
fSTATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . ss:
Oil the . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . day . . . . . . . . . . . 19. . . . . ., before me personally came
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de-
pose and say that . .. .. . . .. .. . resides at No.
. . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . is the
of . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .
. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . .
the corporation described in and which executed the forel'oing instrument; that . .. .. . . . . . . . knows
the seal, of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation.
:u:,I that signed name thereto by like order. ,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Notary Public
Suneard NA.B.LU. Fm. M7—IOM- :garramind S.m Deed, wHh Ana—Ind...d Jai or Wryoratwn.
N CONSULT YOUR LAWYER 1"*R1 S166 THIS INSTRUMENT•THIS INSTRUMENT SHO 11 USED ST LAWYERS ONLY
t atR 9672 MU 383 1or�11�)t� �J—
THIS INDENTURE,made the 30th day of October nineteen hundred and eighty four
�C. BETWEEN
a/k/a MARILYN M. SHEPISH
MARILYN SHEPISH residing at 42 H Eugene's Road, Cutchogue, New York
and MICHAEL SHEPISH'rresiding at West Phalia Avenue, Mattituck, New York
a/k/a MICHAEL J. SHEPISH, JR.
DIST.
1000 r �Y llj �
1,,, !1`
SECT. e t , g
097.00 Party of the first part,and
BLK. DAVID S. BRANCH and ELIZABETH T. BRANCH, his wife, both residing
03.00 at 76 Laurel Road, New Canaan, Connecticut 068 AEZ
LOT
017.000 do
ols.00?� FEB 2 4 1992
party of the second part, sou
�sls� WITNESSETH,that the party of the first part,in consideration of Te v, ,;;>O
other lawful consideration dollars,
lawful money of the United States, paid
by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or
successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever,
Parcel I
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate,
lying and being imcfine at East Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State
of New York, bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the westerly side of Bay Avenue with the northerly
side of Eugene's Road; from said point of beginning running along said northerly side
of Eugene's Road two courses as follows:
1) South 64 degrees 00 minutes 20 seconds west 229.71 feet;
thence
2) South 63 degrees 36 minutes 50 seconds west 20.18 feet; thence
3) North 0 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds West, 308,82 feet; thence
4) North 89 degrees 51 minutes 30 seconds east 207.42 feet to said Westerly side
of Bay Avenue; thence along said westerly side two courses as follows:
1) South 0 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds East 261.45 feet; thence
2) South 31 degrees 44 minutes 10 seconds east 33.19 feet to the point or place
of BEGINNING.
Parcel II
All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at East
Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, bounded and described as
follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Eugene's Road, distant the following
two courses and distant from the intersection of the westerly side of Bay Avenue and
the northerly side of Eugene's Road
1) South 64 degrees 00 minutes 20 seconds West 229.71 feet along the North side of
Eugene's Road
2) South 63 degrees 36 minutes 50 seconds west 20.18 feet along the northerly side
of Eugene's Road;
;x\` RUNNING THENCE from said point of beginning along the northerly side of Eugene's Road
South 63 degrees 36 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 131.65 feet to a point and
other land of Young;
fry
nY
i
LIBER
9672 PALE 384 • •
THENCE northerly along other land of Young North 02 degrees 55 minutes 50 seconds
East 755.74 feet to a point and land now or formerly of W.S. Ditolla:
THENCE North 89 degrees 22 minutes 50 seconds east 135.00 feet to a point and land
now or formerly of W.M. Beebe;
THENCE along land now or formerly of W.M. Beebe, Gertrude Mehl and Lizabeth V.
Dickerson, South 0 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 298.75 feet
to a concrete monument and land of Michael Shepish;
THENCE along the land of Shepish the following two courses and distances:
1) South 89 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds west 57.42 feet to a pipe
2) South 0 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds East 398.82 feet to the point or place
of BEGINNING.
BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises conveyed to the party of the first
part by deed dated 10/21/65 in Liber 5854 at page 99; and by deed dated 4/30/74,
recorded 5/3/74 in Liber 7631 page 283.
ii
.t —
LlBfit 9672 mt 385 • •
TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and
roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof,
TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to
said premises,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or
successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever.
AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything
whereby the said premises have been incumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid.
AND theart of the first
P Y Part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of
the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid-
eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply
II the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for
I,
any other purpose.
The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above
written.
IN PRESENCE OP; r
MARILYN SIE ISH
MICHAEL S I
ff,2jr z7 ,/-
'III
A i. rAk c10U _
f NEW YORK. COUNTY OF SUFFOL19 Est STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNT* SUFFOLK SSt
• the -36X1 day of October 19 84, before me On the-,b If day of October 19 84 before me
ersonallyplgyn Shepish a/k/a Marilyn M. Shepist Personally came Michael Shepish Jr. a/k/a
Michael J. Shepish, Jr.
to me known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that
she executed the same. he executed the same.
No � blC$*ARAMONl Nbjilty ublic
Negry Public. Stns d Now Yalt VWCVU A CHARAMpNfIll
No. 4808867 Na"Pumle,Ste"of NOW Yttl111
OudNiod in Suffolk County No.4508867
CanNtwwn ri PI Match 80. 15L ok
March County IS86
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF 572 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SSt
On the day of 19 before me On the day of 19 before me
personally came personally came
to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument,.with
say that he resides at No. whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly
that he is the sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No.
of that he knows
the corporation described
in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he to be the individual
knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed described in and who executed the foregoing instrument;
to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw
affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- execute the same; and that he, said witness,
tion, and that he signed In name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed In name as witness thereto.
LLA 6E 0 QU(�L'15
Bargain xnb f3nlr J)rrb
WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTORS Acts �'t ^'` SECTION
TITLE NO. �� l�- a� / � T T. G. CO. BLOCK
LOT
`nom TO COUNTY OR TGWN
Recorded at Request at
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
STNRiEM TIRE N NEW TEEE no N TIRE ENEEENNTM Return by Mail to
Distributed by
GARY OLSEN 1�
CHICAGO TITL= 1
P
INNUMAIVCB COARPAMY P. O. Box `P Ito
t�t4Wt:#, New York �sa�
O Zip No.
i
12198
$. . . .
REAL_ FST1\TE
NOVO 71984 aiµnoo poains
.101
TRANccFR TAX {r., ' sllflf
Vl� .,,1
StFFOLK
COUNTY UO 61 L 110
t730'tlUU3�!
14-16-2 (2187)-7c _
• 617.21 gp
Appendix A � �
State Environmental Quality Review i
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM FSZ Q;cletermme
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not alwa ent-
ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. Itis also understoo o
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: (9 Part 1 IN Part 2 ❑Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
M A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
* A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Minor Subdivision for David S. Branch and Elizabeth T. Branch
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer
r Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer)
Fe3 S.
1992
Date
1
PART 1—PROJECT INFOR.. ATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
oPJhe.erlw�tent'i ease complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered
as part of the appl++` af( n for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additionak
information you Belie will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expectea>Dthat co pletion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies`,r e investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION -
Minor Subdivision for David S. Branch and Elizabeth T. Branch
LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County)
Eugene's Road and Bay Avenue (Skunk Lane) , Cutchogue, New York
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR XNMnU=TELEPHONE
David S. Branch and Elizabeth T. Branch ( 203) 966-9782
ADDRESS
76 Laurel Road
CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE
New Canaan Conn. 06840
NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE
N/A 1 ) N/A
ADDRESS
N/A
CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE
N/A N/A I N/A
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Subdivision of 3 . 676 acres into two building lots on the northerly side
of Eugene' s Road and the westerly side of Bay Avenue (Skunk Lane) ,
Cutchogue, New York '(Suffolk County Tax Map No. District 1000, Section
097. 00, Block 03. 00 , Lots 017. 000 and 018 . 002) .
Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ®Rural (non-farm)
❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other
2. Total acreage of project area: 3 , 676 acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres
Forested acres acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 3 . 676 acres 3 . 676 acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres
Water Surface Area acres acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres
Other (Indicate type) acres acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? topsoil
a. Soil drainage: ®Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site
❑Poorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYSE
Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes tNo
a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet)
2
5. Approximate percentage of proposed Sleet site with slopes: X10-10% 10% Ell 0-15% %
Ell 5% or greater _ %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? []Yes IRNo
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes KINo
8. What is the depth of the water table? 40 (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes ®No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes $7No
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
❑Yes ERNo According to N/A
Identify each species N/A
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
❑Yes (&No Describe N/A
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
❑Yes ®No If yes, explain N/A
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
❑Yes ®No
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N/A
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name N/A b. Size (In acres) N/A
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes ❑No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ®Yes []No
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes IRNo
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? Dyes INNo
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes ®No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes [XNo
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 3. 676 acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: 3. 676 acres initially; 3 . 676 acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %;
I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A proposed N/A
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 2 (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential. Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially 1 0 0 0
Ultimately 2 0 0 0
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 35 height; 30 width; 60 length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?676.18 ft.
3
2. How much natural materia ,,.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed fr, the site? 0 tons/cubic yards
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ❑No [$N/A
a. If yes, for what intend,: purpose is the site being reclaimed? N/A
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes 1XNo
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ®No
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
❑Yes EMNo
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 0 months, (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased: N/A
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition).
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year.
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ❑No
8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ®No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction N/A after project is complete N/A _
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/A
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes CXNo If yes, explain N/A
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? El Yes ®No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount N/A
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N/A
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ❑No Type N/A
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes T,)NO
Explain N/A
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes $)No
16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes ®No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No
c. If yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ❑No
e. If Yes, explain
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ®No
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes ®No
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes L�No
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes KING
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ®Yes ❑No
If yes , indicate type(s) Lilco
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 8 gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day 80 gallons/day. L
L
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes ®No
If Yes, explain
4
25. 'Approvals Required: • • Submittal
Type Date
City, Town, Village Board Dyes ®No
City, Town, Village Planning Board 1RYe5 ❑No Minor Snbdi vi ai on
City, Town Zoning Board Dyes ®No
City, County Health Department IXYes ❑No Article 6
Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ®No
Other Regional Agencies Dyes 12No
State Agencies Dyes 5JNo
Federal Agencies Dyes I&No
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Oyes ®No
If Yes, indicate decision required:
❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision ❑site plan
❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? _Low Density Residential (R-40)
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
Two one—family dwellings
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Low Density Residential (R-40)
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
Two one—family dwellings
C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? X)Yes ❑No
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action?
Single family residences; R-40 and R-80
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? ®Yes ❑No
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 2
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 80 , 073 sq. ft.
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes INNo
11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? Mes ❑No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? LXYes ❑No
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes ®No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ❑No
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. --//A'
Applican=ns,or=David/)S. Branch & Elizabeth T. Branch Date _1 —A 2—
Signatur rtle Owners
MA 1 anzap-T.
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
5
Part —PROJECT IMPACTS AND THF"I MAGNITUDE
Responsibility of Lead Agency
General Information (Read Carefully)
• In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
• Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
• The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
• The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
• The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
• In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This
must be explained in Part 3.
1 2 3 ,.
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?
®NO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes [:]No
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
• Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
3 feet.
• Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ E-1 Yes ❑No
• Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No
3 feet of existing ground surface.
• Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
than one phase or stage.
• Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year.
• Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ []Yes El No
• Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
• Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
2. Will there be an effect v. ...ry un,que or unusual land forms found on z_
the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)1XNO DYES
Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
6
• 1 2 3
Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be
IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change
(Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
NNO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
• Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
protected stream.
• Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
• Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of water? ANO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
• Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? 29NO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
• Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No
gallons per minute pumping capacity.
• Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
supply system.
• Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Liquid effluent will be conveye J off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
• Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
day.
• Proposed Action will likelv cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
• Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
• Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
and/or sewer services.
• Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface
water runoff? (ANO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
7
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? nNO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
hour.
• Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
refuse per hour.
• Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
to industrial use.
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
development within existing industrial areas.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS r
8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered s
species? KlNO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site.
• Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
• Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
than for agricultural purposes.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? KINO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
• Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?
®NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2 L
• The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No L
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
8
• 1 2 3
Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ 1-1 Yes []No
agricultural land.
• The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land
• The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ E]Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ®NO DYES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
• Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
• Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? K)NO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ []Yes El No
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
• Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
project site.
• Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities?
Examples that would apply to column 2 ANO DYES
• The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
• A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
9
1 2 3
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be
14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By
LINO ❑YES Impact Impact Project Change
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply? ®NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
any form of energy in the municipality.
• Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result
of the Proposed Action? - ®NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
facility.
• Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
• Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
noise screen.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑yes ❑No
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
®NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge or emission.
• Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
• Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
gas or other flammable liquids.
• Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N0
within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste. L
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
10
1 2 3
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By
18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change
13JO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
• The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ El Yes []No
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project.
• Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
or areas of historic importance to the community.
• Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
• Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts? IXNO OYES
If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one .or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be
mitigated.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1 . Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
• The probability of the impact occurring
• The duration of the impact
• Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
• Whether the impact can or will be controlled
• The regional consequence of the impact
• Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
• Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
11
. 14-14 11 (2180—ec 617.21 • SEQR
Appendix B
tate Environmental Quality Review
Visual EAF Addendum
This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of
the Full EAF.
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
Distance Between
Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles)
1. Would the project be visible from: 0-'/4 '/a-Y2 1h-3 3-5 5+
• A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation
of natural or man-made scenic qualities?
• An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural
or man-made scenic qualities?
• A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Registers of Historic Places?
• State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
natural features?
• National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
or Recreational?
• Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak?
• A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for
establishment or designation?
• A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
scenic?
• Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other
seasons)
❑Yes ❑No
3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year
during which the project will be visible?
1�
El Yes ❑No
1
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT
4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding
environment.
Within
*1/4 mile *1 mile
Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑
Forested ❑ ❑
Agricultural ❑ ❑
Suburban residential ❑ ❑
Industrial ❑ ❑
Commercial ❑ ❑
Urban ❑ ❑
River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑
Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑
Designated Open Space ❑ ❑
Flat ❑ ❑
Hilly ❑ ❑
Mountainous ❑ ❑
Other ❑ ❑
NOTE: add attachments as needed
5. Are there visually similar projects within:
'1/2 mile ❑Yes El No
*1 miles ❑Yes ❑No
'2 miles ❑Yes ❑No
'3 miles ❑Yes ❑No
' Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate.
EXPOSURE
6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is
NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate.
CONTEXT
7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is
FREQUENCY
Holidays/
Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally
Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
2
.7�rrnary 1992
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Minor Subdivision of David S .
and Elizabeth T. Branch
Gentlemen:
The following statements are offered for your consideration
in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its
referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission:
(1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a
residential building is proposed.
(2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in
the grades of the existing roads .
(3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing
structures are proposed.
Yourst ul
��
David S. Branch
��
E zabeth T. Branch
r�
PLANI G BOARD
TOFF O SOU ;BOLD
SU FOQY
LKA E? C,1� 7
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED
WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD
Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning
Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer
to any of the following questions is yes , please indicate
these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate
evidence.
1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes No
(Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined
by the Town Code, Chapter 97 , for your reference)
2. Are there any other premises under your ownership
abutting this parcel? Xffiffi No
3 . Are there any building permits pending on
this parcel? Xss No
4. Are there any other applications pending
concerning this property before any other
department or agency? (Town , State, County, etc. ) Xss No
5. Is there any application pending before
any other agency with regard to a different
project on this parcel? ymn No
6 . Was this property the subject of any prior
application to the Planning Board? X216 No
7 . Does this property have a valid certificate
of occupancy, if yes please submit .a copy of same Yes 2kK
I certify that the above statements are true and will be relied
on the a Boar in considering this application.
Q KCL( �/5 L
S nature r property owner or uthorized agent date
David S. Branch Elizabeth T. Branch
T( 1WN OF SOUTTIny Tl
OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
1%)1".'N HAL1
SOUTHOLD, NEW YOLK
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUINANCY
NONCONFORMING Phl"'MISES
DATE: AUG. 22 , 1984
THIS IS TO CPJRTIFY that .the PRE C.O. #212716
].and
/Xj Itutlding(s)
1 ) Use(s)
located at 1476„ E Lfi Roars Cutchogue
Street Harulet
shtwn on County tax plait as District 1000. Section 9•i block 3
Lot 17 s le.p2does(not)conform to the present Building Zone Code of the
Town of Southold for the following reasons:
insufficient total area (property) . Insufficient total habitable
area. Insufficient front yard.
On the basis of information presented to the Building Inspector's Office,
it has been determined that the above'nonconforming /R/ Land /"Ir/ Building(s)
/_/Use(s) existed on the effective date the present Building Zone Code of the
Town of Southold, atld may be continued pursuant to and subject to the appli-
cable provisions of said Code.
IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED that, based upon information presented to
the Building Inspector's Office, the occupancy and use for which this Certifi-
cate is issued is as follows: A story and one half wood framed building
situated in the A-Residential-Agricultural Zone with access to
Skunk Lane (Bay Ave. ) a town maintained road.
The Certificate .is issued to Marilyn Shepiah and Michael Shepish
(owner, )4ftXRX9FXJ4yyjM
of the aforesaid building.
Suffolk County Drpnrtnrent of stealth Approval N/A
UNI)rRwnlTERS CERTIFICATE NO. N/A
1
NOTICE IS IirRF.BY GIVEN that the owner of the above premises HAS
NOT C'ONSFINTP'D TO AN INSPECTION of the premises by the Building Inspec-
tor to determine if the premises comply with all applicable codes and ordin-
ances, othor than the. Building Zone Code, and therefore, no such inspection
has been conducted. This Certificate, therefore, does not, and is not intended
to certify that the premises comply with all other applicable codes and regola
tions. {1 0
Building Inspector
_ 6 g-
�ad
I 1 � . '
tJ
15.8A(e) eoo' \2 \
12 S
°i
`od13'c
0.
• O
Ir
\9
f
•.d 8. 'p p
o � p
x,a �•d 6 '� �tc
1.4 Ate) c
asd •;
i s.d
�!i g
21 <i
rr
10
2.OA 4. S,
16
6.\Plel 9�r
0 16 8 4 r• /
ed ♦ /� d ••
e� " �• Orr
I;yPI , J
f \? » sed %•i
\Z 9 I ..lid
i
♦3 s C' � �r
6 •d ••Wk./
%.<� .• ro " �/C 10.4 m
I9- Pq�\•d 9.4» %ed ' a •oJ r IQOA I o
d
T sae %x. 9:' �� �• I w
13.1
• \� • O w
eoo ; a
% 10.3
LIA(c)
r
all
♦h II.1•^
12 I=
34.7
.; 27,4A(c) �/ D 4 LS f1 �Jl
X
8
INATURE
sea' O CONSERVANCY \ .•s :. Cp
\6 i CD
o j9 t05
!d
"'• Zoe\ LITHOLD TOWN t
eee !+' d• PLANNING BOARD
26,5 .ad an`�Ilk
xei _ ua
xse .8
2 � sa \42 • �� •• .adt \
4x.' e• 6
1St ox ate.aor.R yea s� `ad \50`
26.6 as,
1e' MATCH LINE f•f4(c` MAT," N29g900
xee' .8 INE
SEE SEC. No. 103 °a1 nr LUP�N--- .o
V
3C COUNTY COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 1OWN OF SOUTHOLG SECTION NO.
200 q00 _
—� Real Property Tax Service Agency VILLAGE OF
County -- - — ---
�l b, Center DISTRICT N0. IOOO 097
Riverhead, L. L, New York
Date of camaltuan PROPERTY MAP
" r MAP Pi
PHONE: 852-2000
` SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Edward 1 . RQmaiRP, COUNTY CLERK
TIVFRF1EP11, NEW YORK 11901
down of Southold Assessor
,/Town of Southold Planning Board
Chief Deputy CountyTreasurer
To Whom This May Concern:
The Subdivision Map Of :
Was Filed , 1111 y
Filed Number , y O
A} stract Number , L � �
Township , Southold C ewe
Owner :
Very truly yours,
County Clerk
Map Department
Form No. 49
1:.157;BIM
0 ✓
RICHARD F. LARK
ATTORNEY AT LAW
MAIN ROAD - P. O. BOX 973
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935
TELEPHONE 516 734-6807
October 27 , 1992
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ATT: Melissa A. Spiro
RE: Subdivision for David S. and Elizabeth T. Branch
SCTM #1000-097 .00-03 .00-017. 000 and 018 .002
Dear Ms. Spiro:
In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am
enclosing seven paper prints and three mylars of the Minor
Subdivision map dated October 6, 1992 . Kindly have the
Chairman of the Planning Board endorse the maps at the final
hearing on November 2, 1992 and return to me three paper
prints and two mylars. I will then file the map with the
Suffolk County Clerk.
Very my yours,
RFL/bd Richard F. k
Enclosures
pF
i92
IuJ
COUNTY OF SUFFOI K
') IATE OF NFW YORK
LEGAL NOTICE Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she i, lhr
Notice of Public Hearing Editot, of [ HE LONG ISLAND FRA'dELER-WATCll%1AN,
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV- a public newspaper printed at. Southold, in Suffolk
EN that pursuant to Section 276 and that the notice of which the mrie',ed is a piinted ,"p, ,
of the Town Law,a public hear- has heen published in said Long Island Lravrler-Watrhin.m
ing will be held by the Southold /
Town Planning Board, at the once each week for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o,re l s
Town Hall, Main Road,
Southold, New York in said -
Town on the 2nd day of successn�ely, commencing on the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
November 1992,on the question
of the following: da y o I . . . . . . .� �+�. . . . . 19 .` - .
7:30 P.M.Final determination _
for the minor subdivision for
Katherine Bitses,in the Town of -.,�' : . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . . . .
Southold, County of Suffolk
and the State of New York. Suf-
folk County Thx Map Number
87-5-21.1 & 21.2.
The property is bordered ons
.Sworn to before me this . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d.iq of
the north by land now or
formerly of Fink and by land
now or formerly of Perry;on the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 . . . . .
northeast by Main Bayview
Road; on the southeast by land
now or formerly of Edson; on
the southwest by Corey Creek. /J
7:35 P.M.Final determination
for the minor subdivision for Notary Public
David S. and Elizabeth T.
Branch at Cutchogue, in the BARBARA A. SNNEIDER•
Town of Southold, County of NOTARY PUBLIC, Slate of r'ow York:
Suffolk, and the State of New Wo. 48U346
York. Suffolk County Thx Map Quakiled in Su4olk County
Number. 1009-97-3-17 & 18.2 Cornnii_siar Expires V3+14y
The property is bordered on
the north by land now or
formerly of Ditolla;on the east
by land now or formerly,of
Beebe,by land now or formerly
of Mehl,by land now or former-
ly of Dickerson and by Skunk
Lane;on the south by Eugene'e
Road; on the west by
Greenberger Subdivision.
Any person desiring to be
heard on the above matter
should appear at the time and
place above specified.
Dated: October 20, 1992
BY ORDER OF THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
1X-10/29/92(62)
f 014
��
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS "� �` ,? SCOTT L. HARRIS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman " �- " "'�►"� SRT Supervisor
George Ritchie Latham, Jr. _'��� O
Richard G. Ward � 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179
Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
October 20, 1992
Richard F. Lark
P.O. Box 973
Main Road
Cutchogue, New York 11935
RE: David S. and Elizabeth T.
Branch
SCTM# 1000-97-3-17 & 18
Dear Mr. Lark:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town
Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 19, 1992.
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set
Monday, November 2, 1992 at 7 : 35 P.M. for a final public hearing
on the maps dated March 19, 1992 .
Please contact this office if you have any questions
regarding the above.
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr/ "-ms
Chairman
M
RICHARD F. LARK
ATTORNEY AT LAW
MAIN ROAD - P. O. BOX 973
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935
TELEPHONE 516 734-6807
September 30 , 1992
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall , 53095 Main Road
P. 0. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ATT: Melissa A. Spiro
RE: Subdivision for David S. and Elizabeth T. Branch
SCTM #1000-097 . 00-03 .00-017 .000 and 018 .002
Dear Ms . Spiro:
Pursuant to your telephone conversation with my secretary
I am enclosing a photocopy of the Minor Subdivision map which
was approved by the Dept. of Health Services , Suffolk County
on Sep 10 , 1992 .
I am in the process of obtaining the required mylars and
prints of the map and will deliver them to you before October
19 , 1992 . It is my understanding you will then schedule the
matter for a final hearing before the Board on November 2,
1992 .
Ae yours,RFL/bd
Enclosure
,..,,a.....-mow
4 '
i�
OCT - 5 1982
Gy
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS .^ SCOTT L. HARRIS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor
George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Off'!r
Richard G. Ward 's �'_(t, Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
Mark S. McDonald � P.O. Box 1179
Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
June 30, 1992
Richard F. Lark
Attorney At Law
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, New York 11935
RE: Minor Subdivision for
David S. & Elizabeth T.
Branch - Cutchogue
SCTM#1000-97-3-17 & 18. 2
Dear Mr. Lark:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town
Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 29, 1992 .
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board,
acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act,
establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a
determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative
Declaration.
The proposed project conforms to existing zoning in terms
of density, providing lots with an average size of 80,000 square
feet or greater. The use is less intense than that which would
be allowed under R-40 zoning. The large size of the lots will
allow for house siting in accordance with setbacks and in a
manner which will not overburden resources.
The site does not contain any sensitive environmental
resources. In addition, there were not any fauna classified as
endangered species, threatened species or species of special
concern or any rare plants identified on the site.
Page 2
David S. & Elizabeth T. Branch
Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for
your records.
Very truly yours,
B Tatt
Chairman
Encl.
yG
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS W x rtL.. �_ SCOTT L. HARRIS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O i..' i .: �„ Supervisor
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
Mark S. McDonald ` r" P.O. Box 1 179
Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
State Environmental Quality Review
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice of Determination of Non-Significance
June 29, 1992
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the
implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State
Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law.
The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has
determined that the proposed action described below will not
have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Name of Action: Minor Subdivision for
David S. & Elizabeth T. Branch
SCTM# : 1000-97-3-17 & 18. 2
Location: Northwest corner of Eugene' s Road
and Skunk Lane in Cutchogue
SEQR Status: Type I ( )
Unlisted ( X)
Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( )
No ( X)
Description of Action:
Residential division of 3 .676 acre parcel, into 2 lots
(80,000 square feet and 80,146 square feet) .
Page 2
David S. & Elizabeth T. Branch
SEQR Negative Declaration Con' t.
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
An Environmental Assessment has been submitted and
reviewed. It was determined that no significant effects to
the environment were likely to occur should the project be
implemented as planned.
The proposed project conforms to existing zoning in terms
of density, providing lots with an average size of 80,000
square feet or greater. The site does not contain any
sensitive environmental resources.
There was not any fauna classified as endangered species,
threatened species or species of special concern or any
rare plants identified on the site.
The use is less intense than that which would be allowed
under R-40 zoning. The large size of the lots will allow
for house siting in accordance with setbacks and in a
manner which will not overburden resources.
Because there has been no correspondence received from the
Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is
assumed that there are no comments or objections from that
agency.
Because there has been no correspondence received from the
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in
the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments
or objections from that agency.
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Melissa A. Spiro
Address: Planning Board
Telephone Number: ( 516) 765-1938
CC: Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Planning Commission
Roger Evans, NYSDEC Stony Brook
Commissioner Jorling, NYSDEC, Albany
Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc.
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Applicant
J UtFILC
716
M
CRAMER, VR OCIATES
ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS
vk
June 12, 1992
Mr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr.
Chairman
Southold Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971 ;i '
61992
Re: Review of EAF for Minor Subdivision of
David S. Branch and Elizabeth T. Branch S0 THOLD TOWN
Cutchogue PLANNING BOARD
SCTM No. 1000-97-03-17 & 18.002
Dear Benny:
As per your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced
project in accordance with your correspondence of May 19, 1992. Tasks and completed
activities are identified as follows:
1. Review Part I LEAF
The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and
amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached.
2. Prepare Part II LEAF
The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional
information concerning our findings is included below.
3. Environmental and Planning Considerations
The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and
area have been consulted. The south part of the site is currently used for a single
family dwelling unit with the balance of the 3.676 acres parcel being vacant. The
proposal involves the division of property into one 80,000 square foot lot for the
existing residential home (Lot 2) and an 80,146 square foot lot (Lot 1) for a future
residential structure. The site is located directly north of Eugene's Road and east of
Skunk Lane, in Cutchogue, New York. The project is an unlisted action, and a Long
EAF has been submitted for review and coordination purposes.
The subject site is located in an area zoned R-40, allowing residential dwellings based
on a yield of 40,000 square foot lots. The proposed project conforms to existing
zoning in terms of density, providing lots with an average size of 80,000 square feet or
greater.
In review of the proposed land division, it is apparent that the two parcel intended for
residential uses do not contain any sensitive environmental resources. The site
contains one existing structure surrounded by limited landscaped areas and specimen
trees (Lot 2). Lot 1 is a vacant field dominated by old field growth species. There
were no fauna identified that are classified as endangered species, threatened species
Pagel
54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455
David S.Branch and Elizabeth T.Branch
Long EAF Review
or species of special concern, nor were there any rare plants observed. There were no
other significant environmental findings noted on the 3.676 acre involved in the land
division. The depth to water is in the range of 40 feet.
The topography of the site is irregular. The slopes on the site vary from 3% to 15%
on the site.
The use is less intense than that which would be allowed under R-40 zoning. The
large size of the lots will allow for house siting in accordance with setbacks and in a
manner which will not overburden resources. Due to the size of the lot it is suggested
that the amount of fertilizer dependent vegetation allowed on Lot 1 to be limited to
no more than 10%, in order to reduce nitrogen load to groundwater.
Based upon a review of the environmental resources of the subject land division,we
believe that the land division will not have a significant environmental impact. In
addition, any site use will be dependent upon providing satisfactorysanitary disposal
in accordance with Article 6 of the Suffolk County Salutary Code (SCSC), as well as
adequate water supply in accordance with Article 4 (SCSC). If the Planning Board is
in agreement, we feel that the Planning Board could appropriately issue a Negative
Declaration, based upon the reasons outlined above.
I hope this letter provides the Board with the information needed to continue review
of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do
not hesitate to call if you have any questions.
Very t urs,
rles J. Voorhis,CEP,ACCP
enc: Part I/II LEAF
CRAMER, V R OCIATES Paget
ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS
..14-16-2 (2187)-7c
• � 617.21 • � ♦ QRi
' s Appendix A E[HiB
"State Environmental Quality Review ' j'
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM 4 1992Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not alwapg Ment-
ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understoo o e ermine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderat wkR.� i, - - .M
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated e�c . N 0 UN
U �3
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used t e uate whether or not,the
impact is actually important. 6 1992
SQIIIHOLI)TOWNi
PLANNING BDARD
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: IN Part 1 ® Part 2 ❑Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
® A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
* A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Minor Subdivision for David S. Branch and Elizabeth T. Branch
Name of Action
o`>✓r o� ou-Vkoka V1lV1'. $oa.r\
c�fE
Name of Lead Agency
-Ty�
fnr, ,�) r, ISRr-b l/'
.Hn-i2rYVFAI
Print pe Name o sib ffir t
Agency Title of Responsible Officer
( Signature of Itespon-s-ible Officer in Lad Agenry Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer)
Date
1
'• PART 1—PROJECT INFOR4117_*N
t Prepared by Project Sponsor "
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
of the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered
-
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additionald
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
Itis expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies, research'dt investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION -
Minor Subdivision for David S . Branch and Elizabeth T. Branch
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County)
Eugene's Road and Bay Avenue (Skunk Lane) , Cutchogue, New York
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR } TELEPHONE
David S. Branch and Elizabeth T. Branch ( 203) 966-9782
ADDRESS
76 Laurel Road
CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE
New Canaan Conn. 06840
NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE
N/A
ADDRESS ( ) N/A
N/A
CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE
N A N/A N/A
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION I f�i01'
Subdivision of 3. 676 acres into two building lots on the northerly side
of Eugene' s Road and the westerly side of Bay Avenue (Skunk Lane) ,
Cutchogue, New York '(Suffolk County Tax Map No. District- 1000 , Section
097 . 00 , Block 03 . 00 , Lots 017 . 000 and ,018 . 00,2) .
Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Ind ❑
ustrial Commercial k(Residential (suburban) ®Rural (non-farm)
❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other
2. Total acreage of project area: 3 . 676 acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural)(OLd F IE�D� 3. 57�o acres 3. 5 16 acres
Forested acres
acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) — acres acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres
Water Surface Area acres acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces ( acres ) acres
Other (Indicate type) tt '' acresacres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? — t"=-gor3 FM [33) 14Q A f B0.3 cmd Rd B -6,r,,A
a. Soil drainage: ®Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site
❑Poorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYSE
Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRf 370). -
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Dyes mNO
a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet)
2
„ 5. Approximate percentage of props J sect site with slopes: k70-10% 'D _ % L110-1 5% `"�
• Ell 5% or*ter _.,3_ % 'tea—fF'f'J_
6. Is tprolect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes IXNo
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes K)NO
8. What is the depth of the water table? X40 (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes NNo
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes XlNo
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
Dyes 1XNo According to N/A
Identify each species N/A
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
Dyes ®No Describe N/A
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
❑Yes ®No If yes, explain N/A
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
Dyes MNo
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N/A
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name N/A b. Size (In acres) N/A
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes ❑No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? (Eyes GNo
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Dyes ®No
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes [NNo
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes NNo
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes BNo
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 3 , 676 acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: 3 , 676 acres initially; 3. 676 acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped n acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %;
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A proposed N/A
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 2 (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential, Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially 1 0 0 0
Ultimately 2 0 0 0
I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 35 height; 30 width; _60 length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?676.18 ft.
3
2. How much natural materi( ock, earth, etc.) will be removed frl site? 0 tons/cubic yards
3. Will disturbed areas be reclai* Ayes ONo ON/A
a. If yes, for what intend_.: purpose is the site being reclaimed? __N1A
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes 1XNo
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ®No
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
Dyes ESN
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 0 months, (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased: N/A
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition).
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year.
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Oyes ❑No
8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes ®No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction N/A after project is complete N/A _
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/A
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes MNo If yes, explain N/A
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes X]No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount N/A
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N/A
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? .Yes ❑No Type N/ASA/yiT4Qy S6rjA(5e
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes K]NO
Explain N/A
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes $]No
16. Will the project generate solid waste? JXYes I&No - - -
a. If yes, what is the amount per month ' -//2 tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No _
c. If yes, give name Z-AAID r/// ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system of into sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑No
e. If Yes, explain gEc ��yr3LE sanitary
2,4rez , �/GTAIS, EYz�
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes ®No
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes ®No
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Oyes (ZINo
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes K]NO
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Yes ❑No
If yes , indicate type(s) Lilco — �L�CT'R/crfy FoyS� L fL/E�S
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity S' 8 gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day 80 gallons/day. L
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Oyes ®No
If Yes, explain _
4
25. `Approvals Required: ` Submittal
• �e Date
City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ®No
City, Town, Village Planning Board CRYes ONO Minor qiihidivigion
City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ONO
City, County Health Department IXYes ONO Article 6
Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ®No
Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes MNo
State Agencies ❑Yes IANo
Federal Agencies Dyes I&No
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? )Yes ONO
If Yes, indicate decision required:
❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit lE5subdivision ❑site plan
❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Low Density Residential (R-40)
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
Two one–family dwellingsr35 1�2 Vz -> DO-tts 4-ti c,+ ocuP ( 2c) oF4-4c (or .
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? E'0w Density Residential (R-40) IVO C- a 1U66
5. What is the maximum potential development of the sitez if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
Two one–family dwellings A11A
C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? T]Yes ONO
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/. mile radius of proposed action?
Single family residences; R-40 and R-80
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a Y. mile? ®Yes ONO
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 2 //
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 89 ,9�"5`tl— ft aat� =-!!X-4,/ (Lo2
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑yes INN
11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? 123Yes ❑No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? E!,Yes ONO
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes ®No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ONO
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. –///9y�
Applicant nsor m Davi Branch & Elizabeth T. Branch Dale �?—
Signatur h N�Jtle Owners
0aVl-Q,b. branCaz TRranch
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
5
Parti - r10JECT IMPACTS AND TH�'t " 4GNITUDE
l • Responsibility of Lead Agen •
General Information (Read Carefully)
• In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
• Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
• The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
• The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
• The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
• In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This
must be explained in Part 3.
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change
1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?
NINO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
j • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
• Construction on land where the depth. to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
3 feet.
• Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
• Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
3 feet of existing ground surface.
• Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
than one phase or stage.
• Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year.
• Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No
• Construction in a designated floodway. - ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
• Other impacts - ❑ ❑ Dyes 1:1 No
2. Will there be an effect t-,- ...&Y un,que or unusual land forms found on
the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)INNO DYES
Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No C
6
•� *11to Potential ,Can Impact Be
• IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change
(Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
29NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
• Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
protected stream.
• Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ E-1 Yes ❑No
• Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of water? 99NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
• Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? NNO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not El ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
• Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
gallons per minute pumping capacity.
• Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
supply system.
• Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Liquid effluent will be conveye.l off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ID Yes ❑No
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
• Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
day.
_. • Proposed Action will likelv cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
• Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
• Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
and/or sewer services.
• Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
• Other impacts: y ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface
water runoff? (RNO AYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ 1 Dyes ❑No
• 2 3
S Ito Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ []Yes []No
• Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? KJNO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
hour.
• Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
refuse per hour.
• Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ Dyes [-]No
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the amountof land committed ❑ ❑ Dyes []No
to industrial use.
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No
development within existing industrial areas.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
r
8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? KINO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site.
• Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No
• Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
than for agricultural purposes.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? P9NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ 13 Yes ❑No
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
• Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?
ONO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ EJ Yes ❑No
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
8
•` Jf 2 3
1 , Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
agricultural land.
• The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land
• The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO DYES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
• Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
• Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? VINO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
• Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
project site.
• Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities?
Examples that would apply to column 2 QNO DYES
• The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
• A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ E]Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
9
C • �1 2 3
1� IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be
14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By
6f7NO DYES Impact Impact Project Change
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply? KINO ' DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
any form of energy in the municipality.
• Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result
of the Proposed Action? - ENO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
facility.
a
• Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
• Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
• Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
noise screen.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
®NO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge or emission.
• Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
• Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ E]Yes []No
gas or other flammable liquids.
• Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ []Yes ONO
within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste. t
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
10
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 1 2 3
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact Be
y
18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Modrate L Pae Mitigated By
Impact
act Im act Project Change
EINO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
• The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project.
• Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
• Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
or areas of historic importance to the community.
• Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
• Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts? ENNO DYES
If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one .or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be
mitigated.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1 . Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
• The probability of the impact occurring
• The duration of the impact
• Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
• Whether the impact can or will be controlled
• The regional consequence of the impact
• Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
• Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
O ,
ti's s
D ..�
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS may, � I ,. ,� SCOTT L. HARRIS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward _ d �. > Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Mark S. McDonald '��c P.O. Box 1179
Kenneth L. Edwards Southold. New York 11971
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
June 9, 1992
Richard F. Lark
Attorney At Law
Main Road P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, NY 11935
RE: Minor Subdivision of
David S. & Elizabeth T.
Branch
Cutchogue
SCTMN 1000-97-3-17 & 18. 2
Dear Mr. Lark:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town
Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 8, 1992:
BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the engineer' s report dated May 26,
1992 . This report negates the one condition of sketch approval.
Please contact this office if you have any questions
regarding the above.
Very truly yours,
� //�J
/1
Bennett Orlowski, Jr �,�
Chairman
Encl. : Engineer' s Report
RAYMOND L. JACOBS T JAMES A. RICHTER
SUPERINTENDENT OF Q ® ENGINEERING
HIGHWAYS ��rol ��0� INSPECTOR
765-3140 765-3070
OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MAY 26 , 1992
BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR.
CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD
TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971
RE: DAVID & ELIZABETH BRANCH (Minor Subdivision )
Eugene ' s Road & Skunk Lane , Cutchogue
SCTM # 1000 - 97 - 03 - 17 & 18 . 2
Dear Mr Orlowski :
As per your request, I have reviewed the map for the above
referenced subdivision. I have also discussed this development
with Mr . Raymond L. Jacobs who agrees that there is sufficient
drainage in the area to accommodate the proposed development.
Parcel # One also appears to have road frontage on Skunk Lane
that is far enough away from the adjacent intersection so that it
will not create a problem for any proposed driveway locations .
If you have any questions concerning this review, please
contact my office.
4S ' cerely,
James A. Richter , R.A.
cc: Raymond L. Jacobs
file
;Y 2 6 IS, D
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
.'5u cE
corcxewa CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT
Cutchogue, N.Y. 1 elephone
11935 (516)734-6907
May 25, 1992
Mr Bennet Orlowski, Jr.
Southold Town Planning Bd.
Town Hall
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Ref. David & Elizabeth Branch
Dear Mr. Orlowski,
Reference the above estate and map. It is the opinion of the Board
that a well is not required at this time.
If there are any changes, please advise. -
Yours truly,
Board of Fire Commissioners
Fy
Matthew J. Martin Secretary
mjm/
�S�FFOI�-�0 E `SW1Frr
0
RAYMOND L. JACOBS N T JAMES A. RICHTER
SUPERINTENDENT OF Q ♦ `F ENGINEERING
HIGHWAYS ��01 r�O!' INSPECTOR
765-3140 765-3070
OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MAY 26, 1992
BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR.
CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD
TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971
RE: DAVID & ELIZABETH BRANCH (Minor Subdivision )
Eugene 's Road & Skunk Lane, Cutchogue
SCTM # 1000 - 97 - 03 - 17 & 18. 2
Dear Mr Orlowski :
As per your request, I have reviewed the map for the above
referenced subdivision. I have also discussed this development
with Mr . Raymond L. Jacobs who agrees that there is sufficient
drainage in the area to accommodate the proposed development.
Parcel # One also appears to have road frontage on Skunk Lane
that is far enough away from the adjacent intersection so that it
will not create a problem for any proposed driveway locations.
If you have any questions concerning this review, please
contact my office.
S ' cerely,
James A. Richter , A.
cc : Raymond L. Jacobs
file
MAY 2 6 1992
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
SUBMI/S/SION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
SENDER:
SUBJECT: �t i
SCTM# : / 7 - 3 ( 1 0 Z
COMMENTS: Z
E
ppggQNING BOARD
D�
o,u �
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road E' rZi+ SCOTT L. HARRIS
P.O. Box 1179 . �� E Supervisor
Southold, New York Fax (516) 765-1823
11971 Telephone (516) 765-1800
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
/ / y 199Q,
Mathew Martin, Secretary
Cutchogue Fire District
New Suffolk Lane
Cutchogue, New York 11935
Dear Mr. Martin:
Enclosed please find ( 2) surveys O /vll/yo e E 1My/U/,S1CD1y(
r �
a� DA4�O S� �F FL�Z• % 1I�9(YG` T/si
Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are
needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells
will be needed.
Please reply by c1U/fE 3 , 199 Thank you for your
cooperation.
ry trulys
(.)-:!iBe`nett rlowski, Jr. }�
Chairman
enc.
hp
4��gUf FO(,�C
OG
IL
y�
I o
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS W �; ,?' SCOTT L. HARRIS
Benneti Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �y �� Supervisor
George Ritchie Latham, Jr. O a�
Richard G. Ward 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179
Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
May 19, 1992
Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc.
54 N. Country Road
Miller Place, New York 11764
RE: Review of EAF
David & Elizabeth
Branch
SCTM# 1000-97-3-17 & 18 . 2
Dear Mr. Cramer:
The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Long
Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned
subdivision to your office for review. I have also enclosed
the following:
1. One copy of the subdivision map.
2. The Planning Board's lead agency coordination request.
3. A copy of the Planning Board' s sketch approval.
The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination
process on May 18, 1992. The $400. 00 review fee has been
submitted by the applicant. If all is in order, the Board will
make their SEQRA determination at the June 29, 1992 public
meeting. Please submit your report no late than June 19th in
order for the Board to review it before the meeting date.
The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover.
If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff.
Sincerely,
^bY/✓L7lYly"t V.�ji"(7�.L�jrf
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. "�
Chairman
Encls.
�OgUFFO(,�c
O
O
c� Gyp
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS OD SCOTT L. HARRIS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �� Supervisor
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward �a Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179
Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971
Telephone (.516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
May 19, 1992
Richard F. Lark
Main Road
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, New York 11935
RE: Minor Subdivision of
David S. &
Elizabeth T. Branch
Cutchogue
SCTM# 1000-97-3-17 & 18. 2
Dear Mr. Lark:
The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold
Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 18, 1992.
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start
the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action.
Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant
sketch approval on the map dated March 19, 1992, with the
following condition:
1. The access to Parcel One shall be subject to approval
from the Engineering Inspector and the Planning Board.
Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of
final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval,
unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and
granted by the Planning Board. Five ( 5) paper prints and two
( 2) mylars of the final map, all containing a current stamp of
Health Department approval, must be submitted before a final
public hearing will be set.
Page 2
David & Elizabeth Branch
Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have
any questions regarding the above.
Very truly yours,
2L 0U
Bennett Orlowski,
Chairman
���,UFFO(kco g
4y0 �' p 1i
Z
b,
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward D� ? � ¢l Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Mark S. McDonald � � P.O. Box 1179
Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
1992-
RE:
992RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request
Dear Reviewer:
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8
(State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental
Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following:
1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below;
2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead
agency; and
3 . Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.
Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed
Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response.
Project Name: tgv"A S, qAA El�zabe T �ranc�
S� 17 1 - 17
a 1!?7
Requested Action: .no( $Ablvistov5 OT 3. b76 acre rcl ( (,y+
lob 8o coo a,. aMI s 44.
O 2 iN D'si
SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I
( X ) Unlisted
Contact Person: /11Pr11SSA 5,,0100
( 516) -765-1 38
•
The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental
impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of
the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you
have an interest in being lead agency.
Planning Board Position:
( X ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency
status for this action.
( ) Other. ( See comments below) .
Comments:
Please feel free to contact this office for further information.
Sincerely, a - /
Xd( aW p it s.
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
cc: u..,.-.a ..r r l
- � sz uvcc-�b
Building'• n _
Southold Town Board
wkSuffolk County Dept. of Health Services
" NYSDEC - Stony Brook
*rvcr±EG _ wit____
N•-r icy c F.�Ref� m o 9 Kasas.t,&—
* Maps are enclosed for your review
Coordinating agencies
O��gUffO(,
O r,ye
G.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS C� SCOTT L. HARRIS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 0 's;� Supervisor
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward ��'� � "�
r� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179
Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
Mot 7 19 9 2
James Richter, Road Inspector
Highway Department
Peconic Lane
Peconic, New York 11958
Dear Mr. Richter:
The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the
following application for your review.
Application Name: -Diau;A FI zg6�1i ��ti
Tax Map No. : 1000
Street Location: J6A1%Wc+ corner of E��ane' 7 I '264 A ✓P
Hamlet Location: C lcho��
Type of Application:
Sketch Subdivision Ma (Dated 3 / /011 )
Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated
Final Subdivision Ma (Dated
Road Profiles (Dated
Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated
Other
Sketch Site Plan (Dated
Preliminar Site Plan (Dated
Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated
Other (Dated
Comments:7t „se (pu; ,- afll Dn,e_ ,I, comrn in*�- on ee nty rr 1-�
r Arw n ao rua ses le f SAI oi�loes f_ e�ieu/
Contact Person:_ 111g�15>a Sn,n„
RICHARD F. LARK •/ S
ATTORNEY AT LAW
MAIN ROAD - P. O. BOX 973
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935
TELEPHONE 516 734-6807
April 21, 1992
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971 Gj"'
RE: Subdivision for David S. and Elizabeth T. Branch
SCTM #1000-097 .00-03 .00-017.000 and 018 .002
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your letter dated March 11, 1992 I am
enclosing the following:
1 . Authorization.
2 . Six (6 ) prints of Sketch Plan of
Minor Subdivision of David S. and
Elizabeth T. Branch, prepared by
Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. , amended
Mar . 19 , 1992 .
3 . Check No. 179 of Elizabeth T. Branch
to the Town of Southold in the amount
of $400 .00 .
If all is in order, would you kindly schedule this
matter for sketch determination and start the lead agency
coordination process .
Very ly yours,
///�
RFL/bd Richard F. a
Enclosures
F[APR 2 21992 }
our o ro,Alu r c
ihNNl.Ie�cr,raI __
March 24 , 1992
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Gentlemen:
We hereby authorize our attorney, Richard F. Lark, Esq. ,
Main Road, Cutchogue, New York 11935 , to represent us during
the subdivision process .
i7
David S. Branch
lizabeth T. Branch
P 2 2 1992 ;
�OgOFfO(�-c
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 0 Supervisor
George Ritchie Latham, Jr. a
Richard G. Ward y�r �O Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179
Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
March 11, 1992
Richard F. Lark
Main Road
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, New York 11935
RE: Minor Subdivision for
David and Elizabeth Branch
N1w corner Eugene' s Road
and Skunk Lane, Cutchogue
SCTM# 1000-97-3-17 & 18. 2
Dear Mr. Lark:
The Planning Board has reviewed the application for the
above mentioned subdivision proposal.
Parcel one as shown on the map dated February 13, 1992,
does not meet the minimum requirement for lot width; it is not
150 ' at the building setback line. The maps must be revised to
indicate two conforming lots.
Please note that the Planning Board has received a cost
estimate of $400. 00 from their Environmental Consultant for
review of Long Environmental Assessment Forms. Your client will
be required to pay this fee in full before we can authorize our
consultant to proceed with the review.
Upon submission of revised maps and the above mentioned
environmental review fee, the Planning Board will schedule the
proposal for a sketch determination and will also start the lead
agency coordination process. In addition, please submit
authorization from your clients for you to act as their agent
during the subdivision process.
Please contact this office if you have any questions
concerning the above.
Very truly yours, / n
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Ms
RICHARD F. LARK
ATTORNEY AT LAW
MAIN ROAD - R O. BOX 973
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935
TELEPHONE 516 734-6807
February 20 , 1992
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
RE: Subdivision for David S. and Elizabeth T. Branch
SCTM #1000-097.00-03 .00-017 . 000 and 018. 002
Gentlemen:
In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am
enclosing the following:
1 . Application for Approval of Plat.
2. Full Environmental Assessment Form.
3. Letter to the Planning Board concerning
grading, drainage and new roads .
4 . Questionnaire.
5 . Twelve (12 ) prints of Sketch Plan of
Subdivision Map of David S. and Elizabeth
T. Branch , prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl,
P.C. , dated Feb. 13 , 1992 .
6 . Portion of Suffolk County Tax Map Section
No. 097 . 00 .
7 . Check No. 175 of Elizabeth T. Branch
payable to Town of Southold in the amount
of $2 ,000 . 00 .
If all is in order, would you kindly place this matter
on the next available Planning Board agenda for their
consideration and notify me of the date and time . If you
have any questions , do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
RFL/bd k chard F. k 2
Enclosures 4 1992 ;
44. W17HTOWN
T
ANNING B�?RO
I
SKETCH PLAN OF
DITOLLA
to
MINOR SUBDIVISION
I 1 Nw22Ae OF PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR
_
- iS
135.0 D; Vm' . ELIZABETH T bQk\N(--H I�
0 BM I AT —
L CUTCHOGUE
i
m I
Z TOWN OF SOUTHOi.PLNIY.
1 I
II
nerd.
�p i y I j •
q`Iwtn
\�
PARCELONE O'�
O 80.146 S.F. 8 -0 DIGCERSON
vi C,
- I
cIso.o �i EUOi NQS \v\ IS IV :N V
,5 - - - - 43
autLmt+: `o w Y i
IN J U I Aro
S '� HNvhoPH
pit .( Z Ij I�I Mfl\ 2Z f t-�
J 8 f
• - O~ s.° 3J `.. ( ��D I
OLD iOA
J ts.-'� d°3 f t. I I I I p NING BOARD
y °p. 130.0 ' ( 1 SCALE 100,_1.
I � i rt+ I �- aI2EA 160,iQo5.F.�._6T6 AC f
Im I \` .� i O°MONUMENT
�r ISTORYF¢.rw PARCEL TWO/�iU1 ! NGTES J'FIPE
:+ — —
17 �, 80,00051E ' i t _I SUFFXie CO.TA_X MAP DA!A_IOOO-97-3-17918.)OE ! •
j v� \ 2.PR0PK'TY IS IN 6UILCING ZONE R
3.CONTOURS REFER TO MEAN SEA LEVEL. '
wop
�.
v1
/ ®/ \ AMENDED MA¢^I9.1992 A' lii2 JE�EJ ' FL6 1? iiQ2
cYU15- _GR€E t..r:;R? N.Y.
MAP ATLAS OF 1997 ( �I MADE KR COMPUTED TDB
DISTRICT 1000 1 REVISIONS DATE APPROVED
SECTION 097 \`
BLOCK 03
LOT 18.4
L
N/F Hoo t
N. 89-22' 50" E
135.00
N/F Kowalski
C SS w
O <
propos septic existing septic }-
44 (S a
n , m
N/F Doherty J
o
16' x 20' detached existing well W
VI
h 90ro9°
Cy-
oil 4 $ O
5 M
rya existing well li
® existing septic
N F Dickerson -7-
28
./� 28 x 42' use Z
V � L N. 89-51' 30" E J
e
150.00
Y
O _ Z
_ proposed 8. N
C
`go
1
�8d • TEST HOLE N
'� (excavated 1992)
in
n
I -
'r r` 150.00
z
:r N/F Riley
49.5'
O �euxiiwngwell
O
NOTES MAP OF PROPERTY SITUATED AT
CUTCHOGUE
1. Measurements are in accordance with U.S. Standards. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
2. Offsets and measurements to foundation unless otherwise noted. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, NEW YORK
3. Unauthorized alteration or addition to a survey map bearing a licensed FILE #: 9290
land surveyor's seal is a violation of section 7209, subdivision 2, of the FILED: NOVEMBER 18, 1992
New York State Education Law. LOTS: 18.4
4. "Only copies from the original of this survey marked with an original AREA: 80,146 S.F. 1 .839 ACRE
of the land surveyor's embossed seal shall be considered to be valid
true copies." SURVEYED FOR CHRISTOPHER F. DWYER
5. Certifications indicated hereon signify that this survey was prepared in CERTIFICATIONS CHRISTOPHER F. DWYER
accordance with the existing Code of Practice for Land Surveyors adopted
by the New York State Association of Professional Land Surveyors. Said
certifications shall run only to the person for whom the survey is
prepared, and on his behalf to the title company, governmental agency and
lending institution listed hereon, and to the assignees of the lending
institution. Certifications are not transferable to additional I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE FROM AN
institutions or subsequent owners. ACTUAL SURVEY COMPLETED BY ME, DEC.20, 1998
L.S.
P.E. & L.S. 36694
L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P. C. SCALE 1"= 60'
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
437 SOUTH COUNTRY ROAD
BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK JOB No. 1000-97-03-01
\DWYER.dwg R14 V'1'
§ 10031 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-31
OO" (b) The,keeping, breeding, raising and training of
horses, domestic animals and fowl (except
ducks)4 on lots of 10 acres or more.
(c) Barns, storage buildings, greenhouses
(including plastic covered) and other related
structures, provided that such buildings shall
conform to the yard requirements for principal
buildings.
(d) The retail sale of local produce from structures
of less than 20 square feet floor area shall be set
back at least 10 feet from any lot line. [Added
5-13-1897 by L.L.No.8.1997]
(3) Buildings, structures and uses owned or operated by
the Town of Southold, school districts, park districts
and fire districts.
(4) [Added 11-29-1994 by L.L.No. 2s.1994] Wineries
which meet the following standards:
(a) The winery shall be a place or premises on
which wine made from primarily Long Island
grapes is produced and sold;
(b) The winery shall be on a parcel on which at
least 10 acres are devoted to vineyard or other
agricultural purposes, and which is owned by
the winery owner;
(c) The winery structures shall be set back a
minimum of 100 feet from a major road;and
(d) The winery shall obtain site plan approval.
B. [Amended 12-21-1993 by L.L. No. 27-19931 Uses
Permitted by special exception by the Board of Appeals.
The following uses are permitted as special exception by
the Board of Appeals, as hereinafter provided, and,
except for two-family dwellings and the uses set forth in
4 Rdaae s NOW fife alb Cd 41,Duck.
10040.2
§ 100.30 ZONING § 100-31
areae are well dosataaatsd # inspired a host of govmn-
mentah programs dewed, w#faryig degrees of success, to
achieve lbia result. F& its PIA "flee loan is expending large
sums of mae+eY'to I I -1 11 eh WAig firm acreage. At the same
brae, dw town bar an tn exercise its authority to
Mso9l mi* regadhb the, and development of this
land to farther the lame pmt ow*"hoamW the legftuste
intestate of fe awe*d odw owners.
§ 10081. U ��3-14-19M by LL No.
E-
In A-C,$$9 L-L+W, &1lGD ft/t6d, Districts, no building
or pry be med- or part of a building
shall be erected or aTt� h is mrsaged, intended or
44019410flto4e lard eei it4r Womet"far any uses except the
following:
A. Atted vasa.
(1) One-istaW detached;,dwollings, not to exceed one
dviedgag cn each'kt.
(2) Igr LL No. 8.1001 The
ins and accessary uses
Prided that these
shall be ao storms of manure, fertiliser or other
odor- or ng substance or use, except
apra�ieg and°elasWlsg`f�8 proect vegetafaoa, within
150 flat of pay lot line:
(a) The rpist
so-pXom orolw, vineyard
esti 4 the mainteasnce of
080 1,
sed; kwM p4ppoial setts of products
gwft on toi}. 11 .
� •Y s-WSW by LL No.
10040.1
77
�
%G NE
C b }\
t HCK 14� Oy.
OI T04Lq 1\gym 24YtiNf al
j.-
Wy
/ ® � J .a�•I'�Er Mss Yvk/bY
6o 14
o
1 � � fp •: .- aswasrmy,
' butte �} 3 1F0.1t�.s,,,, �.� '"` �- Elf L (11QtAN .,?'16C1L ;Awls' �°`"`""S 0e""""'^m•a+mrw
g Mh4Yuaee Meees
{ ,_.'/4 '
4 'srvieAe'ter s�'+;. O �`f $ � �xEYJbfwal � amaaw bMYun.asre..
.
AREA= 36'7ti �1 :2
N
o@- mss' TlJT et! .
E ♦ SO.O
JLY dJ' •� I�', /.. SC(rF4:LX_" Y T.ax PFi¢CYp �f�
a 2. pQav s aroaeQ
xi � a a: f0
�, *x = .� A Ti,GY *�iiost.Y w4,47-o wwiy
'.,ayC, "{ � P t'Sf"JJ• `r ,� trw�-st �yiftts~*S vwctt tTKS
eMCGµ L K F :st ✓;�' c .i. -..b. .,. r` ,p, TOW
� C by a�A ..IMs{R 4'1MRJMtY M( THE STwMQAQ
�RAL
.tae ,, „ _ b►ba.t='/Ylixr Nbi'be ! hFb 'irotec ,Gcaurry• �;
-,•t "+� � ,yy MJtAt GIJ/Y lu!►TYO¢
QAC
rY ,Y� s b Itt"x.e4#?i%LO
89 S s ..-! -t v � `°�' : ,b .. ,A !wi ,�'N( VbVF•bPOK CO f7�` x . .
t'►' w Ytt1IS � �"t���btf�Ci evsrtt�
+ may..., l � d.'.'•� ,r tnr�+�� '. f
sawi eu..oaE Jyi7FBY ci'ast.►st .zyrwr,v 7E+Y• 3Wrs�i rjs
-
r FT. !N A"ALA Wwov-TNl MAF WAILMNOE'
-,�•p--•,5r,srrr •�•bwo eo.r, wcr l+c tuttY! C-0/
vdt-s�to
. •�lwc.r+.rc � : A.ro r,.ewr cw,vcaar` bPo�/uJOA1J1!"! N.ovr atc'w 1frwrb
f{,—a. { + "` ':.• _ ocuerf �lJtYw.v r;vus: a r
IIPP$OVc�D 1992 s, - '
PGwN ns� '/20DE@7C�['
y <rp �., :y' ,.YOIIT(iY41 PG
ZLCENGi.fm .rLRA1tQ I . ,.
k
-} —r . .. ZNA1 mil — _. •• ..-. _._. �
�Fl ♦ ,. � --- -.�_ w..�tYtMYY fK1bAe+I < �C � _.__._--.._.__ - _.
�APPR p
z t i a 6
}•JMR. x .Sa b ar ( z 4 % y Ss.' /�(Wu�[W�sl}l�l�i. �sI�L(II TH
■l t 1 ti '^ .. } "'x' fi br ;�F',... KriL OF If Ts W�lVL1�WY
rw�o r�ee IIAUPPAII6�N.Y. SEP '
:. Lib'---' O�_.•Ar/bDPG A.
04
NC
•xf.,o.' r* .. 4n. ...._,.., s� .: ,e .s f e r�+ + ...,w:^.x..r+c--".._..,....® w *Mw.v +.*�q+°'rex ^..r•w-n vve-va,,.. -,.-
a,.
r.
e `
a
. ^e.�A+!�t�Y�4� -�M�•-.r+-�+`w�..-rwir..-�.��.^.��.r ». .w.nn�—..... ... �f. . �,�..wi4-.-._. _ -+..��...�--- _. .�....�.-�—�...+.K`w�.-...�--.rte- �— _
e
P
�f[r[' 'dd{j{j � I•Mti+Fw-+r w FJ��R� 'i
x✓.G RI
( Z
4 1
F ! 4
Ivw
4F TOW% OF S
i ►4* i
f
WAM ONE
FEB
S 5F. trinid
� 1
G � r
'nor
t
is #'
Cr
' s»
(S ?561
wo
D r in=
w
Person far
4.. .';.... '
SUI
and on hype
i s>ronlx, i Y, a.
r 2 st:
• x
ti i _
_. -.. _ .�_. _. ... . _.. _._..__ .... .......-_._._._.�_.. ._ _�.. .---......_ -�_ ._.� . .._.rte.._... .�...��.. .-..__ ._�
CITJLLA,
,
2° MIWOR J �Ifr4 ` IH
- 1 t agzzSa E _. - -)F Pr2opEu Y at QvFv_� F�4
NO
5EE9E AT
r Z TOWN D
. p ! WWF <
8 ' MEHL
I � � , f
IT
Ci,
PARCEL '�Etv/f ,. 1 ul A
n '�•14ti = - � ��
a�- d r
Fo7s�.��� � G3LL (t Y I<E'Y MAP N � Lh--In cP on Smvsq map not cc1U Sh.:1>_:ad sarvayoff huced ssaV oc1 :Utsaal shall not be condderoZto be a valid baa eogt 6D -,; ? � C-usrenteasWestedb rwivelgaNr+n
i OO .\ - -y- CD is roc sred•and on his behalf to t'!�
q f c m -n•/llonamm-ml nnn ,r.-.1
Lu ° ': lnPullon li¢to•1 t c ,cn A
N,8 Q'✓'�t 3 6'•!3. ces of the la ejn [:,1-
Pro
1•are nuth .._ ^.'.a ✓`-ALE . 4tx'
. \g _OD v i +'.- r3 qne gtutiona or subsquern
iw i� 1 ST:Ji:/ i-F NG .�- � OA 2CEt. "1JQ . In '•J - 4 _ _
80,0005.E NGrES: ;;I^
, Jf F :)L c COTAX ,
�1AP ✓A ;..
off. 2 P 'OF'Ew r 'S G+lvG ZJtvc 2 4 OF NEt7
u x!: 3 _gyp T,�'k 2EF aL MEAN SEA 's_cVEI, r P�GK VA L0 1
------
ok
V) ��9. ^.�. ! n.•�' #
U-)
c `r
(Cb
*�
r x942 � �`��+AtS 256J
A: LFE tF
AMENUEU MAt"L.19 Jqqz -- _