Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-95.-1-3 ._jncce app!i, on received Application reviewed at work session , oK Nro. OK Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised submission received Nro I OK Pzm,Nro. OK Sketch plan approval -with conditions 25 e c o 694 exr � v 96Cr+K 2) Lead Agency Coordination 210to s 1419-/ SEORA determination Corr( 3 zi 9S Preliminary maps received Preliminary maps reviewed at work sessica ,Nro. L -revisions Md R Road profiles/drainage submitted IMIMM oK -revisions Nro. OK KI Road profiles/drainage reviewed be Engineer ,xro. OK D OK Sent to County Planning Commission ,Nro. a M xro. OK Review of SCPC report 43 c Preliminary hearing Preliminary approval -with conditions Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewell location Notification to applicant to include on final map Draft Covenants and Restrictions received J Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed ,Nro. OK Filed Covenants and Restrictions received C Bond estimate submitted Bond adopted by PB KKI Bond adopted by TB a Determination of park&playground fee Park&playground fee adopted by TB Open Space documents ROK Documents reviewed by TA INFO. Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval Final Public Hearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions Payment of bond Payment of inspection fee Payment of park&playground fee Endorsement of subdivision MS alnn • t$-16-2 (2/87)-7c • ""`ll 617.21 SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Un/listed Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: fH Part 1 (J Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead a ncy that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measure4,described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions A C NJ l DEyv 7L o em F Co Ite. Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency atureof Pr ar r diff i i Date 1 g�g PART 1—PROJECT INFORMOON Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effeci on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consideree -as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona! information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION ACMTE V L! �1 T o� LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) O i'LE Dr/ UTG J ^s e /J2.t NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION S✓1307V/SiaN o� lze..70 Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban 019,clustrial OCommercial ❑Zesidential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest IEAgriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 4!5 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) v acres Forested acres �- acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 3 7 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres acres acres 3. What is predominant soil types) on project site? a. Soil drainage: [P<Vell drained % of cite L94oderately well drained Zo % of site OPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYSE Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 3370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? OYes J o �. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proed project site with slopes: ❑0-10% % E10-1 5% O % 1115% or greater _ % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or c9ntain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Dyes InNo 7.-Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ONO 8. What is the depth of the water table? '50 (in feet) JJ 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes LdNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes OeNo 11. Does project site �c�ntam any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes ;No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any un.ggye or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes Z0 Describe 13. Is the project site�,!p'resently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes 14o If yes, explain 14. Does the presents include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes too 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Dyes 5KNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Dyes LINO w b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Dyes ONO 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes ❑No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes A 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wasM;5? Dyes [P/No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor acres. b. Project, acreage to be developed: Z 6, acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped Z9 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: — (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed — %; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing — ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One F ily Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure .35 height; ?d width; 0 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? Oo9 ft. 3 2. How much natural materialp, rock, earth, etc.) will be remPved frooe site? tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Dyes ONO ;N/A .. a. If yes, for what intend— purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes EYNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction Ili months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month __ — year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes pNo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes VdNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project No"r �// 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities//? Dyes ff7No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes QNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [/Yes ONO Type Sime; ._L 1=A�LgjL �) 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ®No to Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes IE/No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ONO c. If yes, give name ; I0catT6n d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ONO C. If Yes, explain T/ 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes TNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. L�1 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes 51"No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes L No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy u,e? Dyes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) _ /'V/A 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day —J o o Ogallons/day. / L_ 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes No If Yes, explain 4 25.,Approvals Required: *Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes ❑No City, Town, Village Planning Board fa't'es ❑No A43 /9c) -City, Town Zoning Board ED ❑No City, County Health Department LIYes ❑No MEA , zEj ;QEP7 Other Local Agencies []Yes ❑No Other Regional Agencies Dyes ❑No State Agencies Id Yes ❑No '17 Federal Agencies Dyes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? C Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit IYlsubdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? — 00 b ou Sg -P-r 14s t E till C�- 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted b the y proposed zoning? C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a I/ mile radius of proposed action? '30 o aO 54 per- CLJI 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a Y. mile? 1Ke5 ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? I C7 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ( C j JJ 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of"Z. �iq ��or water districts? Dyes (�INo 1l . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ❑Yes M9 o a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes 2No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Signature Date Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. ti 5 Part 2ROJECT IMPACTS AND THEVAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. •_Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 r Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to th Impact Impact Project Change P Y b project site? �N0 ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑Yes foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed ❑No 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ []Yes ONO 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. - • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ than one phase or stage. ❑Yes ONO • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑1'es ONO 2. Will there be an effect tr. ,..ry ur.,que or unusual land (or pis found on the site? (i.e, cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.- 0 ❑YES • Specific land forms: ❑ L L7 Yes ENO '` 6 • 1 23 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservatjbn Law, ECL) Impact Impact Project Change NO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream, • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ EJ Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existin or new body of water? VNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater JJ quality or quantity? 9N DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. ,y • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be convey-,J off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment .end/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns or surface water runoff? QNO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Z 7 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainagepatterns. D ❑ []Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 NO OYES • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. ❑ 11 []Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. 11 11 ❑Yes ❑No • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. D ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. ❑ 11 ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endang ed species? a Examples that would apply to column 2 NO DYES • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. 11 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑N° than for agricultural purposes. Rs 11 ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threaten d or non-endangered species? � 9 Examples that would apply to column 2 pJNO OYES • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. 1003 • Proposed Action requires the removal of more Of mature forest (over 100 than m acres years of age) or other locally important []Yes vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? �� Examples that would apply to column 2 ANO L'IYES • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 T . t 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres 1�1 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? NO [DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Ye , ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. § • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 11 Yes []No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure o�f 'istoric, pre- historic or paleontological importance? IdNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ El Yes No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ El Yes []No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? /� Examples that would apply to column 2 kfNO DYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ '• A major reduction of an open space important to the community, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ El Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Z 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 2 3 Small to :Large ential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation syst ms? Moderate Mitigated By MNO []YES Impact pact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 _ • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sourcO of fuel or energy supply? VJNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ transmission or supply Y I system to serve more than 50 single or two family E] []Yes ❑No residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibratiop(as a result of the Proposed Action? - 2NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? eJNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of ❑Yes ❑No accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ Oyes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous El ❑Yes ONO waste. L L • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 2 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact Be y 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existin .NO ❑YEScommunity? Moderate Large Mitigated e Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controver y related to potential adverse environmental impacts? 2NO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be poterttially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 .14-16-2 (2187)-7c. 1410 4 617.21 f) Appendix A JL 'h _ F X9 '8 'SEQ: State Environmental Quality Review L-- .• _ . „ ; FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ORMF „ r Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a projec or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determin: significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmenta_ analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: �I A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions A Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer ------------------- Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency / 6 y Lure of Pre are ( ifferent from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consider: as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol- new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and speci each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION Include Street Address,Municipality and C nty) --- - NAME 0 APPLICANT/SPONSOR _ if n�BUSINESS TELEPHONE / ADDRESS m l EL >'• b (, CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS ( ) CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION fiL SubAUIS/Ono L Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban Odustrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm ❑Forest Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 4'"7 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 49 acres acres Forested S acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 4 t acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres —' acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained _R61 % of site ❑Moderately well drained 20 go of site ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYi- Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Dyes LrN0 " a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 ;. Approximate percentage of props project site with slopes: ❑0-10% % Eli 0-15% to % Ell 5% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or coJ/�tain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Dyes O No C •. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes Q40 8. What is the depth of the water table? 50 (in feet) --// 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Oyes 14 //'' 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes (9"No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? OYes VNo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) OYes 9& Describe 13. Is the project sitpresently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes o If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes LB1Io 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ❑Yes o a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? OYes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? OYes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes I`J-No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes L3f to ��// 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? OYes L`7No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 4•-7 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: ns acres initially; acres ultimately. c Project acreage to remain undeveloped I 9 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated Per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: Initially l/ One jiamily Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure _.'fiT height; yo width; —�_ length. -� j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? S3 a ft. 3 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be rempjved from the site? tons/cubip yards, 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? [Dyes ONO N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes &No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month ---�— year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ENO8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes LKo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project Nonce , 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes LrJNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount _ b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Cres ONO Type Sniff 6 FA MI L-y 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes eNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? El Yes C�No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes 12/No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ONO c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ONO e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes C,40 a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? ygars. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DY" QNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per. day)? Dyes �_'(No // 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes I–AO 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Dyes ONo If yes , indicate type(s) k ZA 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 70o O gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes IffNo If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: • • Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes ❑No City, Town, Village Planning Board lyes ❑No %:>/-A)- City, Town Zoning Board ❑Y s ❑No City, County Health Department L�IYes ❑No A6 Z71- 'DEP7 Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ❑No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑No State Agencies (fes ONo �2:>E G Federal Agencies ❑Yes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information �� 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? 2 Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: 2/ ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit 2subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? -a'op 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 2/ Z-0 7--'$ 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? L'tS'es ONr 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a Y. mile radius of proposed action? yds aao *5P r-T 2 J LL DT" 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a r/. mile? (lyes ON, 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? Z3 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? .4-o )o.o S* 'FT 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ❑Nr 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police fire protection)? ❑Yes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ❑No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? OYes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Date Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 P. 2—PROJECT IMPACTS AND 1nEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine.significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to th Impact Impact Project Change P Y g project site? NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ Oyes 1:1 No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect t.:. ...ry un.que or unusual land fp//ms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ZNO OYES t • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 6 ' 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact B= 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By (Under Articles 15,24, 25 of the Environmental Conserv ' n Law, ECL)VImpact Impact Project Chang: NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ El Yes ONO • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes eNo • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation czusing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes LINO supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ [Dyes ONO day. • Proposed Action will likely cau5,2 siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO existing body of water to the exte it that there will be an obvious visual • contrast to naturai conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chernical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ DYes ONO and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or water runoff? g pattern , or surface NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. Q ❑ Eyes ONO 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? --�// Examples that would apply to column 2 ANO DYES • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. ❑ ❑ El Yes ONO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes (--]No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ONO IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS g. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangg ed species? YJNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ' Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ' Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ' Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ONO � c Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threaten or non-endangered species? - Examples that would apply to column 2 NO DYES Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ❑ Dyes ONO Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ Of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important ❑ ❑Yes ONO ~ vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ��/ Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO `-"ES The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) ❑ Dyes ❑No 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By _ Impact Impact Project Change ; • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No agricultural land. j • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural !and or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more * i than 2.5 acres of agricultural !and. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No !and management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm ! field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No t IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? NO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed !and uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structureistoric, pre- historic or paleontological importance? of'NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 NO DYES r The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑.No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 2 .3 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systffms? Moderate Small to Potential Can Impact Be f�JNO DYES Impact Impact ProjLarge ect Chanated ge Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: - ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sourc of fuel or energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 —"O DYES • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO Eltransmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ Dyes 11 No residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibratio as a result of the Proposed Action? Examples that would apply to column 2 NO OYES • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. ❑ 13 Dyes ❑Lfp • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). • Proposed Action willnoise ❑ ❑ Yes ONO ambient noise levels for rnoise eoutsside of structures.ceeding the local ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. ❑ ❑ F-1 Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Examples that would apply to column 2 ` 0 OYES Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, ❑ ❑Yes ❑No infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for dne million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. ❑ El El Yes ONO' Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ❑ � ' ❑ Dyes ONO waste. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 10 1 2 — 3 _ IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potentia( Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existin community? Impact Impact Project Change NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ []Yes []No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ Dyes []No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 1-1 No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions ' Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 14-14-I1 (:.97)—gc 617.21 ' Appendix B SEAR State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAl~ Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-'/a 'A-1/2 1/2-3 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ " to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation _ of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ - ❑ Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 4= 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(i.e., screeried by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes ❑No I _ 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ❑No G 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within Essentially undeveloped "A mile "1 mile Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ED- Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed ❑ ❑ 5. Are there visually similar projects within: "h mile El Yes El No '1 miles El Yes ❑No '2 miles ❑Yes ❑No '3 miles 'El Yes ❑No ' Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Activity Holidays/ Travel to and from work Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ El ❑ EJ At a residence El a ❑ f At worksite ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I I 2 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentafive) (final) approval of a subdivision p ----accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold 't rz O M D anning Board, and represents and states as follows: L The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is no nFr 5 owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in land under application.) St)U7HOLQ rq ` ? s to be 2. The name of the subdivision i . . PLANNINGs 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of rt suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in follows: Suffolk County Clerk's office / // . .... . . .. .... . Page . ..L{ .�. / Liber .t 1.�j. .�..U....... . ... Page Liber . . . .... .. .. .. ...... . . ... Page On . .. .... .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . Liber ... .. .. .. .. .. .. . . ...... . Page Oil . .. .. .. . . .... ... . .. . . . Liber . .. .... . ... .. .... ....... Page .... .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . . . . . ... . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . ..• , . or as distributee . .. .. .... .. .. . ..... .. .. .. . . .. ........ . . . . . ... .. .. . . .. .. ...... .. . . ... . . .. . . . . . . S. The arca of the land is . . ' •• •• •• ••.. .. . acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except . .. .. . . .. . . . . .... . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . by mortgage / " ' s ... 7. The land is encumbered 1 ) a5 {0110\l'S: . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . .... ..... (a) Mortgagc recorded in Liber . .. .. .. . . .. . . . Pagr . . . . y� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . al of $. l7�. !1.1. unpaid amount in originamoun$ . . . .. . . . . n /� w / . . . . . . lield by L..CJ,/.p . . . .. . address W. . :�. .1. (b) .Mortgage recorded in Liber , • , , , , , • , pa ' " " ' ge .. . . . . of .�G . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... in original amount /�.�,.Q�'C'. . unpaid amou� g, ./.Q.ij 4 r?CTCJ. . . . . . . . held by . . . .. . address�,cJ�.-Yx� (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . ... . . . . . .. . Pagein original am . . . . . . . ...... .. . of ... ...... .... . unpaid amount held by ... .. .. .. .. . . .. ... ... .... ........ .... ... address . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. .... ... .... .. . . .. . . S. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except . .�cRtt . ..... .. .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . ... . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . ............ .. ... ... . . ...... 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts (Lba Q Jpj�y. .... .. ..... .. .. .... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. U,O c—>o 0 . . . .... . . .. . . .. .. .. ........ .. .... .. ..... ...... ..... 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, cept . .. .. .N'?. .. .. ... . ..... . .. .. .. . . ... . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. .... .... 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. \lame of D trict, if within a District, is . . . Gc'S :.4.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . ... . .. .. .. . . 13. Water mains will be lair) br . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . .. . . . LI 4-- . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . lines. •• •"•. ••.••• . • •..• • •• • • • • •. .. . and (a) (no) cfharge will be made for installing sa 15. Gas mains will be installed by L/ L C,v an (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . _ .-:.IG. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by th Suffolk Count} IIighwav e applicant to be existing public streets in tb system, autres Schedule "L'" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on lite plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in th Town of Southold IliIhttay system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show sane. 1S. There plat:are no existin buildin s Oil the or structures on the land which arc not located and show = 19. Where the plat shows proposed >trccts tt hich arc c\tcusion, of street; on adjoitiint� sub eliviston map, heretofore filed. there are no rrscr•c ,lripi,gt the end of the steccts on snit esuung maps at their coujunctiotls with the proposed stc:�ls_ 20. In the coarse of these proceef in"s. the applieutt trill ofirr proof of title as required b% Sec. ,m; of the kcal Prnperty Law. 21. S;:hmit a copy of proposed .(Iced for lots -hot•;in all rrstrirtinn>, coycnants, etc. AnnexSchedule ••D" 22. The applicant estimates that tine cost of grading and required public improvements will .5.e 7C . .. as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of Performance Bond be fixed at • •• •••• •• • • • . . years. The Performance Bond will be written a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F", DATE l ��....�.. . t,... .. .. ...... �?..�.� (Name of .AQ t) } Z7 , B (S m tuure/anted Title) (Address) STATE. OF NEW YORE, COUVTV OF Onth J . . . day of. .. .. .��h before me personally can to ne known to be t e individual described in and n executed the foregoin instrume / and acknowledged that G: . . . . . . . execute 'th same. [RYAN VMIM NOTARY►U6LN:,EMM of NY No./795256,Noweu Cn comm.Espim March>D, 19.�C/ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Votary ublic STATE OF NEW YORIi, COUNTY OF ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . ss: On the . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . day . . . .. . . .. . . of 19. .. . . ., Ucfore me personally cam • • . . . . . . to nic known, who being by me duh_- sworn did dt pose and say that . . . .. . . .. . . . resides at Vo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . that . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . is the . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. of . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . .the Corporation described in and which executed the fore!"oin instnunent; that .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •the x•al ..i said corporation; that the soil affixed by order ui the I)Wd'I of directors of saidcorporation. >i�ncrl name thereto by like order. I :Ii:it . .. . . .. . . . . . . . Votary ['ttb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lic • " • PU N � G I No�Bo"a,rt 1988 TO' �N fl �S OF I D SOUTHOLDTOWN ' Su •''� •� PLANNING BOARD �EULIfi;�;U"IIiV. 1 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Major Subdivision Procedures Applicant Submits surveys -�IaYnd affidavit of ownership Application placed on agenda for Board to review Board to field inspect Inspection Report at next meeting Recommendations for Revisions OR Sketch \PLlan Approval AND Lead Agency Applicant makesyrrevisions and Applicant makes Planning Boar. resubmits __ preliminary submission coordinates w `� the Health De. Planning Board makes and DEC ". .necessary referrals 1, y When above ag: Public hearing set have responde, application i! Public hearing held, on agenda for Board has 45 days to SEQRA determis make a determination y on preliminary map Board to pass Declaration i Applicant makes final are no advers: submission to the enviro, y Planning Board makes necessary referrals y Public Hearing set Public hearing held, Board has 45 days to _ make determinati_pn on - - final map. $ Final determination made... If approved, the Chairman endorses a the surveys when the conditions, if any have been met. If apPr ved and signed, surveys ^et 1 3 I � �✓ ✓ SOUTHOLD TOWN I a ��y SCUT �Yy,y 11, 530 5 Main Road PLANNING BOARD u+ 3 4 PLANNO'�B .Y 1179 Southold, New York 11971 JUDITH T.TERRY ) TELEPHONE TOWN CLERK '-'� (516) 765-1801 REGISTRAR OE VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 1, 1988: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby approves the follow- ing amendments to Chapter A106, Subdivision of Land, of the Code of the Town of Southold, as approved by the Southold Town Planning Board following a public hearing on said: Chapter A106 (Subdivision of Land) of the Code of the Town of Southold is hereby amended as follows: 1. Section A106-22.A. (2) is hereby amended to read as follows: (2) All applications for plat approval for minor subdivision shall be accompanied by a fee of five hundred dollars ($500. 00) per lot, together with an inspection fee of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) . 2. Section A106-23.A. (2) is hereby amended to read as follows: (2) The application filed with the Town Clerk shall be accompanied by a fee of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) plus one hundred dollars ($100.00) per acre, or part thereof, in the proposed subdivision. An inspection fee equal to six percent (6$) of the amount of the approved performance bond must be paid after approval of the Bond amount by the Town Board and before final approval of the plat. !� J ue r Southold Town Clerk November 2, 1988 'r P LA fV:IV I N.G-8�ON,6 D 'fO�i'V OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLFC�GOU�ITY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1933 NOTE: Due to the shortage of staff and increasing workload we ask that all maps submitted and revisions thereto are to be folded. Any rolled or unfolded maps will not be accepted. Thank you for your cooperation. Valerie ,ScoDaz Tct.,n Planner Pv 1NNING�QARD TORN Off ; SOUTHOLD SL,FFOLR- COUITI' Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1933 MEMO TO: Whom it may concern FROM: Town of Southold Planning Board DATE: June 30, 1987 RE: Inspections on Road Construction Please be advised the pursuant to, Section A103 5 , the Highway Department (765-3140) must be contacted 48 hours prior to commencing any work on roads within subdivisions in ordor that tie work can be inspected. Any work done on any road without notifiying the Highway Superintendent shall be considered unacceptable pursuant to Section A103-43. C� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 5 TELEPHONE r (516)76S-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: All applicants to the Planning Board FROM: Bennett Orlowski,Jr. , Chairman RE: Filing maps DATE: August 31, 1988 The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Tuesday, August 30, 1988 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board adopt the following policy for all applications pertaining to major subdivisions, minor subdivisions, set-off ' s, and lot-line changes on filed subdivision maps. Section 335 of Real Property Law requires that all subdivision maps be filed. The Planning Board as of tonight, August 30, 1988, will require that two ( 2) mylars and four ( 4) paper prints with Health Department approval, be submitted for the Chairman to endorse at the time of final approval. After the maps are signed, two ( 2) will be returned to the applicant to be filed with the County Clerk' s office in Riverhead within thirty (30) days of the Chairman' s signature. One of the filed mylars must be returned to the Planning Board office along with seven (7) paper prints of this mylar. � ac If'{Vf� � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road v' ' P.O. Box 1179 �- Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: All applicants to the Planning Board FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman RE: Correspondence to Planning Board Office DATE: August 15 , 1988 The Planning Board office processes a large volume of correspondence every day. You can help us process this mail (and ultimately your application! ) in a more efficient manner by doing the following: 1. Submiting cover letters with all materials The cover letter should state: A) the name of the project and b) the Suffolk County Tax Map number of the property. c) the reason for the submission of the material. d) a telephone number where you can be reached during normal office hours. 2 . Submitting only complete applications Keeping track of .items submitted under separate cover takes up a disproportionate amount of staff time and space. Keep in mind that complete applications are given immediate attention. Incomplete applications are likely to be returned. Thank you for your cooperation. id PRELIMINARY LAYOUT - MAJOR SUBDIVISION DOCLi•E✓:1TS A. 12 copies at 100' = 1 inch 1• Subdivision name, tom, county, north point, scale, n and address of orme.r, subdivider and engineer or sure 2• Name of adjoining subdivisions and/or owner os record adjoining property 3. Zone district and boundary lines of districts, if mor one district 4. Parcels of land to be dedicated and conditions , if an 5. Property lines, easements, buildings, watercourses, m: outcroppings, woods and single trees 12 inches diametc measured 3 foot above base o£ trunk or other signific features of subdivision and adjacent property 6. Location of existing sewers, water mains , culverts am drains on property, pipe size, grades and flow direct 7. 2 foot contour elevations of existing roads at 100 foo intervals - approximate grading if more than 2 foot ch 8— Widths and location, grades and street profiles of all streets either public or proposed by developer. 9. Location and size of water, see:er systems 10. Storm drainage plan 11. Plan and cross sections of sider:alks, street lights, 's trees, water and sewerage, recharge basin(s) , pavement: manholes and underground conduit 12. Design of bridges or culverts contemplated 13. Lot lines and suggested building locations 14. Actual field survey by licensed engineer or lard survey with corner markers approved by Superintendent of Highrr B. If only a section proposed of entire tract, man to show ent tract 1" to 100 ' outlining probable future development syst C. Copy o£ covenants and restrictions for all or any part of t D. Two (2) copies of the preliminary pl�tzL application E. Part I Environmental Ilssessment Fol: FINAL LAYOUT - MAJOR SUBDIVISION DOCU1,ENT REGUIREiT 4TS 1. Two (2) copies of final plat application 2. The original final plat tracing Dauer prints of the final 3, ': Two (2) cloth prints and three (�) plat 4. The original and one (1) copy o£ deeds of cession to street; rights-of-way, easements c- other -sites to be devoted to Pi' use , and the original and one (1) copy of agreements , coven or other documents showing the manner in which streets, par and other areas are to be reserved and maintained for the co-.non use of the residents of the subdivision, including provisions for homeoemersassociations and property assessmr if needed, all, certified as to their legal su:ficiency by To,.m Attorney. riots of all construction and landscaping plans ai 5. Two (2) P drawings as required by and in accordance faith to,:m specif 6. An -estimate the required improvements , ... as to the cost of � to , streets , CUrOing, Sanitary including, but not limited Storm drain lines , 'rater lines and fir" f2`ldr ants and/or fire%.iells . 7. One (1) certified copy of the %.rater ccm11 -, contract iodi c that mains will be installed and water :rill be transmitter the subdivision when available or required. S. If firewells are to be installed, a copy of the proposed Ment to be entered into with the appropriate fire distric convey title to said firewells to the fire district when together with legal access thereto. The plat to be recorded with the County Cler'c shall be printe linen or be clearly dra,.m in India inlc upon tracing cloth. T of the sheets shall not exceed terenty by thirty-six (20 x 36) - - 1nC lud ing a mar-infor bindin- oftwo (2) Inc. es outside of t • border along the remaining sides. The plat shall be dra,.m ai scale of no more than one hundred (10a� feet to the inch and. with North poin-A-et the top of the ina` . than i c•^ynL i S reqi Unnrj, an additional on-il index Sheet OS t}'.e Same S1. , 'De oi't e0, Sn O':11n'T, to scale t'^e Haire SL:�::'d` Yi Si On �•/1t-? lot ar n•=oers clearly cuFFO � TOA HO D S YO t }v pl p.� yob Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 9 , 1988 The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board at a regular meeting on Monday, May 9 , 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set the estimated unit prices for bonding of subdivision construction, Town of Southold, for 1988 as follows: ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT AMOUNT Clearing & Grubbing acre 2,500.00 Unclassified Excavation c,y, 6,00 Concrete Pvmt Removal S.Y. 5.00 Concrete Struc. Removal C. Y. 50.00 Sawcut 1,f. 3.00 Select Borrow Fill c.y. 8.00 Fine Grading S.Y. 1.50 Topsoil supplied or Rehandled c.y. 20.00 Furnish & Lay Pipe 12" RCP 1, f. 20.00 Furnish & Lay Pipe 18" RCP l. f. 30.00 Furnish & Lay Pipe 24" RCP 7, f. 40.00 Catch Basins ea. 3,500.00 Manholes ea.' 3,000.00 Leaching Basins 8' Di am 1. f. 250.00 Leaching Basins 10' Dian l. f. 300.00 Leaching Basins 12' Diary, l. f. 35D.00 Concrete Masonry c,y. 300.00 Concrete Curb 1,f. 10.00 Stone Block Curb 1.f. 20.00 Concrete Sidewalk s. f. 3.50 Concrete Driveways & Aprons s. f. 4.50 Bit. Driveways & Driveway Apron S.Y. 25.00 Bituminous Pavement Small Quant, ton 100.00 Bituminous Pavement Large Quant. ton 60.00 Single Appl.Srface Trtmt S.Y. 1.50 Double Appl. Srf ace Trtmt. S.Y. 2.50 Concrete Curb & Gutter 1.f. 15.00 ' Concrete Valley Gutter s.y. 60.00 Erect Chain Link Fence 6' High 1.f.' 20.00 Chain Link Fence at Sump 1. f. 40.00 Topsoil & Seeding s.y. 5.00 Planting Trees & Shrubs ea. 200.00 Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wall - Small C.Y. 400.00 Traffic Line Markings 1.f. x 4" 1.00 Sweeping & Cleaning l, f. 0.50 Tack Coat s.y. 0.50 • Run of Crusher Screenings C.y. 30.00 Asphalt Curb 1. f. 4.00 Metal Beam Type Guide Railing 1. f. 60.00 Test Holes ea. 600.00 Planting Sod S.y. 6.00 Dense Grade Aggre. Base Course C.y. 40.00 Street Lights ea. E2,000.00 Direct Burial Cable #6 1. f. 2.00 Electric Cable in, 1" PVC Conduit 1, f. ';0.00 Street Signs ea. 250.00 Conc. Monuments ea. 80.00 Street Trees ea. 200.00 Erosion Control acre 1,OOO.00 Slope Stabilization- Hydroseeding acre 5,000.00 Maintenance & Protection of Traffic L.S. 3,000.00 PLANNING BOARD MEMBARs ��gUfFO(�0 RICHARD G.WARD p OG Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Y)h� y �j P.O. Box 1179 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y 2 Southold, New York 11971 ,r BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Fax (516) 765-3136 O WILLL4M J. CREMERS y� � Telephone (516) 765-1938 KENNETH L. EDWARDSOj r PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 20, 1997 B. Anthony Aliperti P.O. Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board reviewed your letter of May 15, 1997, at yesterday's work session. As noted in my letter of April 24, 1997, the Planning Board did not grant an extension of the conditional sketch approval on the 10 lot proposal. Therefore, the conditional sketch approval has expired. Application materials, including an application fee, for the proposed major subdivision of 21 lots must be submitted before the Planning Board will proceed with review of the major subdivision. I have enclosed a copy of the application materials for your convenience. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Melissa Spiro Planner enc. MS Ari thoo'�/l ny Aliperti P.O. Box 149 Shirley, NY 11967 Town of Southold Planning Board Main Street Southold, New York Re: Aliperti Estates Dear Mr. Chairman and Members of the Board: Presently, I have an approved sketch plan for a 10 lot subdivision with each lot containing five acres. As you already know, the Town's zoning laws only require 2-acre zoning. This was designed with the understanding that the Suffolk County Health Department would waive the water tests and the town Engineer would waive the paved private road to a stone road with natural drainage. To my understanding, the water tests are still required along with a 16-foot paved private road containing all the necessary drainage. Economically, it is not feasible to perform these improvements for 10 building lots. I contacted the Town of Southold committee for the purchases of development rights for information regarding selling development rights to the Town. Unfortunately, the Town is willing to purchase the rights at approximately $4000.00 per acre. Since I have owned this property si e 1987 and have already invested approximately t1.7 million dollars into the land, it is definitel not a good option. .� ! `sti3�.iE^.Fr�� wrldf� .L4'.�/ '�"' a�ivY_I,?/ln.••.,¢ illi d,� -�' �(i / I have no alternative but to resubmit the original layout containing 21 building lots as per the yield map. Recommendations from the Department of Environmental Conservation regarding the three waterfront iots are still being adhered to and I will fulfill my original pian to leave 20 acres on Oregon Road for Open Space. Enclosed please find the yield map and the conventional subdivision layout. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at my office at (516) 281-2646 or at my home at (516) 744-4828. Thank you for your consideration. Very trul O Anthony Aliperti MAY 1 6 D TOWN MING BOARD PLANNING BOARD MEMBA �QSUf • OG Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARD P.O. Box 1179 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. h 2 Southold, New York 11971 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. p P" Fax (516) 765-3136 WILLIAM J. CREMERS y� ��� Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 24, 1997 B. Anthony Aliperti Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board reviewed your April 7, 1997 request for an extension of sketch approval at the April 21, 1997 work session. As you know, on September 30, 1997, the Planning Board granted an extension of sketch approval which was valid until February 6, 1997. The additional extension was granted with the condition that all conditions of the February 6, 1995 sketch approval be addressed and a complete preliminary submission be made prior to the expiration date. A complete preliminary submission was not presented during the extended time frame. Therefore, the conditional sketch approval has expired. The Planning Board is not in favor of granting any additional extensions. As per our telephone conversation of yesterday, I am enclosing another copy of the report the Planning Board received from Allan Connell in regard to the erosion and sediment control plan. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. S1� y, Melissa S Planner enc. �� 0 P6 United States Natural Resources Riverhead County Center Department of Conservation Room E-16 Agriculture Service Riverhead,New York 11901 Melissa Spiro Southold Town Planning Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 January 9, 1997 Dear Melissa: I have reviewed the latest revision of the erosion and sediment control plan for Aliperti Estates. The applicant has addressed all of the concerns and recommendations I made in my letter dated October 8, 1996 with a few minor exceptions. The seed mixture for site D mixes warm season grasses with cool season grasses. I would recommend one or the other but not both mixed together. I would suggest eliminating the cool season grasses, i.e., tall fescue, creeping red fescue and perennial ryegrass from the mix. Also, there is a typographical error on page 5, first paragraph line 9. I believe it should read "summer seedings (between May 30th through August 14th) and winter seedings (between October 1st through March 31st) are not recommended". Otherwise, the plan appears to provide adequate protection for erosion and sediment control during and after construction if implemented according to plan. Sincerely, Q� . dxjtt-. Allan S. Connell District Conservationist • � P�3 m.5 April 7, 1997 Anthony Aliperti P.O. Box 149 Shirley, NY 11967 Town of Southold Planning Board Main Street Southold, New York Re: Aliperti Estates Dear Members of the Board: I am requesting an extension on the sketch plan approval for the above mentioned property. I am currently in negotiations with the Town regarding the purchasing of development rights on 35 acres. As you already know, an appraisal is being performed for this portion of the land, and for this reason, a delay has naturally occurred. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at my office at (516) 281-2646 or at my home at (516) 744-4828. Thank you for your consideration. Very tr y rs, thony Alipe PR 16 Sub uission Without a Cover Letter ,Spst,d]tw: Tony Alperti Su,bjeCl: Alperti Estates SC7'R/#: 1000- 95-1-3 Date: 2/4/1997 C papinten1s: Sell development rights to 33 acres of farm land, with a total of 5 building lots excluded from the 45 acre site 3 flans United States Natural Resources Riverhead County Center Department of Conservation Room 1-16 Agriculture Service Riverhead,New York 11901 Melissa Spiro Southold Town Planning Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 January 9, 1997 Dear Melissa: I have reviewed the latest revision of the erosion and sediment control plan for Aliperti Estates. The applicant has addressed all of the concerns and recommendations I made in my letter dated October 8, 1996 with a few minor exceptions. The seed mixture for site D mixes warm season grasses with cool season grasses. I would recommend one or the other but not both mixed together. I would suggest eliminating the cool season grasses, i.e., tall fescue, creeping red fescue and perennial ryegrass from the mix. Also, there is a typographical error on page 5, first paragraph line 9. 1 believe it should read "summer seedings (between May 30th through August 14th) and winter seedings (between October 1 st through March 31 st) are not recommended". Otherwise, the plan appears to provide adequate protection for erosion and sediment control during and after construction if implemented according to plan. Sincerely, Jc -� Allan S. Connell District Conservationist I DIA ,IAN 3 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Town Hall, 63095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARD G� y� P.O. Box 1179 Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y Z Southold, New York 11971 .r T Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. O WILLIAM J. CREMERS y� 0\� Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNETH L. EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 8, 1997 Allan Connell USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service Riverhead County Center Room E-16 Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Proposed major subdivision for Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Connell: In October 1996, you reviewed an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the above mentioned subdivision. You made several comments and suggestions regarding the plan which the Planning Board forwarded to the applicant. I have enclosed a copy of a revised Erosion and Sediment Control Plan which was received by the Planning Board on January 7, 1997. The Planning Board would like your professional opinion in regard to the proposed plan. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Please contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Melissa Spiro Planner enc. f January 6, 1996 Melissa Spiro, Planner Southold Town Planning Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Addendum of the Proposed Major Subdivision, Aliperti Estates Dear Melissa: Enclosed herewith is the updated Erosion Control Plan with all changes made in accordance with Mr. Allan Connell's comments from his letter dated October 8, 1996. I trust that this plan will be reviewed by your office and Mr. Connell as soon as possible due to my extension being terminated in February, 1997. I have complied with every comment requested for this plan to be approved. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at work at either(516) 342-9874 or(516) 348-7600, or at my home (516) 821- 3849. Thank you for your consideration. I hope that you had a very happy and healthy holiday season. Very truly yours, Michael Aliperti cc. Anthony Aliperti � 3 1 JAN 71997 LANDSCAPE PLAN INTRODUCTION This landscape plan has been developed for Aliperti Estates (AE). The purpose of this landscape plan is to provide a vegetative cover over the existing soil materials existing for the AE area in order to reduce erosion, stabilize the side slopes, protect the existing soil materials, and provide a recharge basin to control runoff on-site. The landscape plan has been developed in two phases. The two (2) phases of development scheduled for AE are considered, namely, the construction phase and the final phase. Every effort is made so that the landscaping of AE will be consistent with and complimentary to plantings around the subject property. Information regarding the drainage calculations is calculated in the text entitled, ALIPERTI ESTATES, Drainaee Considerations and Calculations for Aliperti Estates. All plant materials have been selected which are adaptable to Long Island climatic conditions and to the existing soil materials. In addition, the seed mixtures which are proposed have been chosen because of their ability to provide adequate vegetative cover for the desired life expectancy of each development phase. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS AND RATIONALE The types of soil material and length of exposure will vary through each of the different phases of construction, and the final phase. Several different seed mixtures were selected with input from the USDA Soil Conservation Service to stabilize the exposed slopes during the different site development conditions and level of service expected on AE property. The following list includes both interim and permanent seed mixtures. The term "interim" is used loosely and refers to a seed mixture which is expected to provide relatively short-term vegetative coverage (two to four years), during the site development for the soil materials. This is discussed in further detail later. The following seed mixtures are labeled A, B, C, and D. These areas where mixtures are to be placed are shown on the Plan for Erosion Control (enclosed). This plan is divided into three sections and are as follows: ])Site Grading Plan, 2) Erosion Control Plan, and 3) Erosion Control Final Phase. The Erosion Control Final Phase plan shows the areas (A, B, C, and D). The list below depicts the planting types. A. Beach area (no mowing) B. Bluff(no mowing) C. Swale (no mowing) D. Ground Area (no mowing) PROPOSED SEED MIXTURES Application Rate Variety (Lbs./Acre) A. Beach Area American Beachgrass 1,345 culms/1000 sq.ft. B. Bluff `Blackwell' Switchgrass 4 PLS "Atlantic" Coastal Panicgrass 4 PLS "Niagara" Big Bluestem 4 PLS "Aldous" or"Camper" Little Bluestem 2 PLS "Caucasian" Bluestem 2 PLS Sand Lovegrass 2 PLS "Goldstrike" Sand Bluestem 2 PLS C. Swale Creeping Red Fescue 20 lb/ac "Lathco" Flatpea 25 lb/ac "Lancer" Perennial Pea 5 Ib/ac "Arid" or"Apache" Tall Fescue 20 lb/ac Redtop 10 lb/ac D. Ground Area American Beachgrass 1,345 culms/1000 sq.ft. "Blackwell" Switchgrass 4 PLS "Atlantic" Coastal Panicgrass 4 PLS (continued on next page) "Niagara" Big Bluestem 4 PLS "Aldous" or"Camper" Little Bluestem 2 PLS "Caucasian" Bluestem 2 PLS Sand Lovegrass 2 PLS "Goldstrike" Sand Bluestem 2 PLS Tall Fescue 20 lb/ac Creeping Red Fescue 20 lb/ac Perennial Ryegrass 5 lb/ac * PLS =Pure Live Seed where: 100 * lbs of 100% PLS Seed Required = Actual lbs of commercial seeds to be used % PLS of Commercial Seed Being Used ** Trefoil seeds must be inoculated at four times the manufacturer's recommended rate when hydroseeding. Although both the Bluff mix (B) and the Swale mix (C) are for permanent cover establishment, there are several differences between these two mixtures in terms of maintenance. Mixture B contains warm season grasses which are typically associated with native prairies and are well adapted to droughty, low fertility, sandy sites. This mixture contains grasses that will germinate within 10 days given the proper moisture conditions (such as sand lovegrass), while others are slower to develop and produce primarily root growth during the first year. If newly established plants do not appear vigorous after the first growing season, 300 lbs. of 15-10-10 fertilizer will be applied in June, one year after seeding. After two years, the vegetative growth should be fully established and will require little to no future maintenance. Spring seeding dates are recommended for best establishment of this B mixture, for the period between April V through June 15'. This mixture was recommended by the USDA Soil Conservation Service for soil Stabilization on abandoned sand and gravel pits. • The swale mix (C) contains cool season grasses which are typically associated with lawn or turf areas; and also contains a nitrogen-fixing legume (Perennial Pea and Flatpea). The grasses will show up within the first growing season, however, the peas will be slow to establish and may appear by the second or third year. Since this is a more typical turf-type mixture, it will require annual fall (top-dressing) applications of 200 lbs/acre of 10-10-10 fertilizer for the first 2 to 3 years. This mixture is slightly less tolerant of low fertilizer and maintenance conditions than (B) and may also require supplemental irrigation during droughty spells for successful establishment. Fall seeding dates are recommended for best establishment of this P#2 mixture, for the period between August 15" through September 30". Summer seedings (between October I" through March 14") are not recommended. A temporary erosion control measure is proposed during these periods. This includes the application of two (2) tons per acre of shredded straw mulch followed by a chemical spray tackifier, such as Terra Tack II, or equivalent (A straw or coconut fiber with photodegradable plastic net on both sides should be utilized as an erosion control blanket after grading and seeding. This blanket should be stapled in place on the side slopes of the swale). As with the above grass mixtures, shrubs and woody plant material chosen for AE must be extemely hardy, shallow rooted and able to withstand drought conditions. The following is a list of trees and shrubs which may be incorporated into future detailed landscaped plans for the final development of AE. The majority of these plants have been identified as volunteer species or landscape plants which are growing successfully on Long Island. All species are adaptable to the growing conditions expected at this site, and several are indigenous to the area. These woody plants will be utilized to provide wildlife habitat, to visually"break-up" the side slopes, and otherwise improve the aesthetics by adding seasonal color. Shrubs may be planted on small berms and in areas where the depth of the rooting medium is four (4) feet or greater. Trees will be utilized primarily at the edges of the read/beach to provide a natural buffer/screening effect. Proposed Shrubs and Trees Shrubs Trees Autumn Olive E. Red Cedar Staghorn and Fragrant Sumac Shadbush Rugosa Rose Black Locust Northern Bayberry Norway Spruce Bristly Locust Limber Pine Virginia Creeper White Pine SITE DEVELOPMENT AND PLANTING SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION PHASE: The NORTHERN/OUTER FACE and the SOUTHERN FACE will be hydroseeded with seed mixture (see Erosion Control Plan and Erosion Control Final Phase), and the inner face areas will be hydroseeded with permanent seed mixture, (B), if construction is completed during the normal growing season (between March 15'h through May 15'h and August 15'h through September 30`h. However, if construction is completed during the summer (May 16'h through August 14') or winter (October 1"through March 14`h) seasons, these areas will be temporarily mulched to control soil erosion until the next consecutive growing season. The temporary mulch cover will then be raked off or otherwise stripped immediately prior to hydroseeding. The soil will be tested prior to the addition of lime and fertilizer to ensure that the appropriate amounts are spread utilizing a lime spreader. The hydroseeded slurry will contain the appropriate seed mixture, fertilizer (600 lbs/acre of 5-10-10) and green-dyed wood fiber cellulose (500 lbs/acre). Immediately after hydroseeding, all treated surfaces will be tracked with a bulldozer to ensure adequate seed/soil contact for germination. Finally, the treated areas will be hydromulched with wood fiber cellulose at 3000 lbs/acre. The entire NORTHERN FACE and the majority of the SOUTHERN FACE will remain essentially undisturbed throughout the sequential construction of the development. These areas are therefor proposed to be permanently seeded. Grassy vegetation and low ground cover growing on the side slopes will not affect the integrity of the existing ground cover and ground conditions. The soil material existing over the subject area consists primarily of sands with little or no organic matter. Unless it is suitably stabilized, erosion of the protective soil cover material on the inner face is expected to be severe. Hydroseeding with the same mixture specified for the bluff(see page 3), is proposed to stabilize this slope and SOUTHERN area. A permanent mixture was chosen rather than an interim mixture, because it is anticipated that the term of extended coverage will range from three (3) to approximately twenty (20) years. The establishment of a vegetative cover is expected to sustain or improve the specified permeability rate for the protective soil cover material. This is based on experiments performed by the U.S. Geological Survey (U.S.G.S Water Resources Investigations Report 85- 4323, 1987) in which infiltration rates were measured on seven (7) recharge basins in Nassau County. Three (3) of these basins were permitted to grow natural vegetation throughout the testing period. All three basins reportedly sustained high infiltration rates. Although the experiment did not directly assess the effects of vegetation, the report states that the root systems created a network of flow channels which was the probable cause of the high inflow rates. The permanent seed mixture B, was selected for its ability to withstand the droughty soil conditions expected on the Southern innerface areas. This seed mixture contains grasses that will germinate quickly (within 10 days given the proper moisture conditions) and others which are slower to develop to provide longer term coverage. FINAL PHASE During the final site development, a minimum 6-inch thick growing medium of specified topsoil or a 1:1 mixture of graded sand/composted leaf mulch will be placed except in area D. Top soil is not needed in area D if warm season grass mixtures of Switchgrass, Coastal Panicgrass, Bluestem, and Lovegrass are used. These grasses are accustomed to sandy, droughty conditions although they may be slow to establish. Woody Plant materials may be established on small planting berms and will be created to beautify the area. Maintenance will be limited to top-dressing with fertilizer (the first year after seeding for seed mixture (B), or for the first two to three years after seeding for seed mixture (C), immediate repair of any areas damaged by erosion or other disturbance and replacement of dead plant stock. No other maintenance activities are expected. DRAINAGE Drainage considerations and calculations have been submitted in the first portion of this report entitled, Drainage Considerations and Calculations for Aliperti Estates. The planners for this project would also like to mention that the side slopes of the recharge basin will be graded and stabilized with the seed mixture specified and mulched with straw followed by a chemical spray tackifier or an erosion control blanket stapled in place. Also the house lots will be developed with homes that contain downspouts and gutters which outlet into dry wells. This procedure will reduce the volume of runoff from impervious areas. ALIPERTI ESTATES DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR ALIPERTI ESTATES Drainage for the ALIPERTI Estates has been considered as required by the regulatory and local agencies. Consideration for the undeveloped areas next to the ALIPERTI Estates was also taken into account. Watershed area encompassing the existing ALIPERTI Estates was obtained from the regulatory authorities. AVAILABLE INFORMATION ON ALIPERTI ESTATES: Total Drainage Area = This is the total drainage area encompassing the ALIPERTI Estates which will be contributing rainfall on to ALIPERTI Estates. 19.02 Acres Effective Drainage Area = This is considered as the area of the ALIPERTI Estates where the soil cover and effective drainage can be controlled by proper design and construction methods. 19.02 Acres Design Rainfall = 5 inch rainfall over 24 hour period. Using the Town of Southhold drainage design criteria, as stated in the code Section Al 08-28, applying the formulae to the site specific: Volume required for a drainage in cubic feet Vc= A*R*C cubic feet. Where Vc= Volume capacity in cubic feet A= Tributary drainage area in square feet within the subdivision and shall include areas outside the subdivision if necessary. 19.03 Acres R= Five inch rainfall C= Weighted coefficient for runoff of the drainage area (C=0.3) Vc = 19.03*43560sgft/acre*(5'/12")*0.30 Vc= 103,618.35 cubic feet Volume of the recharge basin as provided on Aliperiti estates: Vr— Ar (Area of recharge basin)* Dr (depth of recharge basin) Where Ar = Area of recharge basin is calculated using a planimeter. Planimetric area of the recharge basin 30600 square feet. Dr= Depth of recharge basin 6.0 feet (Elevation difference between maximum contour to min contour Depth) Vr= 39600 sgfeet*6feet average depth Vr= 237,600.0 cubic feet Findings: From the above calculations, it is apparent that the Volume provided by the recharge basin is adequate for providing capacity for the storage of the runoff from drainage area as shown on the plans. Volume of Recharge basin area > Volume of runoff from the drainage area. Hence O.K. NOTE: As per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, the volume of the proposed recharge basin is 128,938 cubic feet using the prizmoidal formula. This formula takes into account the side slopes of the structure. As per this information, the size of the proposed recharge basin of 128,938 cubic feet is still greater than the volume of runoff from the drainage area which is 103,618 cubic feet. Hence O.K. r PLANNrNG BOARD MEMBERS f �gUFFO(� O RICHARD G.WARD �lj Town Hall, 53095 Main Road = y Chairman < ', P.O. Box 1179 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. ti Z ,4 Southold, New York 11971 .✓ BENNETT ORLOWSHI,JR. Oy'y Fax (516) 765-3136 WILLIAM J. CREMERS �'� Telephone (516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 7, 1996 B . Anthony Aliperti Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan submitted on September 9, 1996, was reviewed by Allan Connell of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Mr. Connell had some minor comments on the latest revision. The Planning Board is asking that you comply with Mr. Connell's report. Please note that as mentioned in the Board's October 1, 1996 correspondence, a complete preliminary submission must be made prior to the expiration date of the sketch approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, eliss� < Planner enc. _ Sunk ' • � Pik, n�S United States Natural Resources Riverhead County Center Department of Conservation Room E-16 Agriculture Service Riverhead,New York 11901 October 8, 1996 Melissa Spiro Southold Town Planning Office 0 - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Off I O �y Re: Aliperti Estates R SOUTHOLD TOWN Dear Melissa: PLANNING BOARD -•-- •- I have reviewed the revised erosion and sediment plan for the Aliperti Estates Subdivision and have the following comments: The seed mixtures selected for the four sites are appropriate with some minor modifications. First, I would suggest adjusting the seeding rate at the bluff (site B) and ground area(site D) as follows: Switchgrass: from 2 LBS./1,000 Sq. Ft. to 4 LBS./1,000 Sq. Ft. Coastal Panicgrass: from 2 LBS./1,000 Sq. Ft. to 4 LBS./1,000 Sq. Ft. Big Bluestein: from 3 LBS./1,000 Sq. Ft. to 4 LBS./1,000 Sq. Ft. The seeding rate for the swale should be adjusted as follows: Creeping Red Fescue: from 10 LBS. per acre to 20 LBS. per acre. Tall Fescue: from 15 LBS. per acre to 20 LBS. per acre. The site list indicates that areas B and C will not be mowed. Areas A and D should also not be mowed. The seed mixture for site D mixes warm season grasses with cool season grass which is contradictory in terms of management of theses grasses. I would recommend one or the other but not both mixed together. If the cool season mixture is selected, I would suggest substituting Tall Fescue for the Kentucky Bluegrass due to the droughty nature of the soil at this site. Mowing is acceptable if the cool season mixture of Tall Fescue, Creeping Red Fescue and Perennial Ryegrass is used. The spring seeding date for the warm season seed mixture, specified for site B, should be changed to cover the period from April 1 st -June 15th to be successful. -2- The list of proposed shrubs and trees has four species that may be difficult to locate; these include: Staghorn Sumac, Fragrant Sumac, Shadbush and Virginia Creeper. Alternative shrubs and/or trees should be specified if these species cannot be located. In the description of the final phase on page 9,the applicant proposes to place 6 inches of top soil or a 1:1 mixture of graded sand/compost. The plan should specify where the soil material will be placed. It is not necessary to apply top soil to area D if the warm season grass mixture of Switchgrass, Coastal Panicgrass, Bluestein and Lovegrass is used. These grasses are well suited to sandy, droughty conditions. They are slow to establish but once they take hold, create a natural prairie-type appearance that is well protected. The volume provided by the proposed recharge basin appears to be adequate to provide the storage necessary for the runoff generated from a 5 inch rainfall in 24 hours. This is assuming that the calculated volume of runoff of 103,618 cubic feet is correct. Using the prizmoidal formula, which takes into account the side slopes of the structure, the expected volume of the recharge basin is 128,938 cubic feet. This is greater than the total volume of runoff of 103,618 cubic feet. The greatest area of concern for this structure is how the runoff will enter the recharge basin. If it is allowed to travel over the side slopes, severe erosion problems will result. The applicant must design a structure that will allow the runoff to enter the basin without causing severe erosion. I have included standards and specifications for a grade stabilization structure and paved flume. One of these structures may be suitable for this site. The outlet to such a structure should be protected with rock riprap to prevent scouring. The side slopes should be graded and stabilized with the seed mixture specified and then mulched with straw followed by a chemical spray tackifier or an erosion control blanket stapled in place. Since the proposed house lots fall within the contributing watershed for the recharge basin, I would recommend requiring gutters and downspouts outletting into dry wells to reduce the volume of runoff from impervious areas. Please contact me if you have fiuther questions or if I can be of additional assistance with this project. Sincerely, Oland- ( ffl Allan S. Connell District Conservationist • Figure 56.18 • PAVED FLUME DETAILS ovoe�i� bw .� a ^J>�i jl •yw. S. DRAINAGE MIN BOTTOM MIN CHANNEL MAX SIDE MIN INLET MAX CHANNEL AREA ( AC ) WIDTH ( FT ) DEPTH ( FT ) SLOPE ( FT/FT ) DEPTH ( FT ) SLOPE ( FT/FT ) 5 4 1 . 3 1.5: 1 2 1. 5: 1 10 8 1 . 3 1.5: 1 2 1.5: 1 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1. SUBGRADE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE LINES AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS. REMOVE ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AND REPLACE THEM IF NECESSARY WITH COMPACTED STABLE FILL MATERIALS. SHAPE SUBGRADE TO UNIFORM SURFACE. WHERE CONCRETE IS POURED DIRECTLY ON SUBSOIL MAINTAIN IT IN A MOIST CONDITION. 2. ON FILL SLOPES THE SOIL ADJACENT TO THE CHUTE FOR A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET MUST BE WELL COMPACTED. 3. WHERE DRAINAGE FILTERS ARE PLACED UNDER THE STRUCTURE THE CONCRETE WILL NOT BE POURED ON THE FILTER. A PLASTIC LINER, MINIMUM 4 MILS THICK, WILL BE PLACED TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF THE FILTER LAYER. 4. PLACE CONCRETE FOR THE FLUME TO THE THICKNESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND FINISH ACCORDING TO DETAILS. PROTECT FRESHLY POURED CONCRETE FROM EXTREME TEMPERATURES ( HOT OR COLD ) AND ENSURE PROPER CURING. 5. FORM, REINFORCE, AND POUR TOGETHER CUTOFF WALLS, ANCHOR LUGS AND CHANNEL LININGS. PROVIDE TRAVERSE JOINTS TO CONTROL CRACKING AT 20 FOOT INTERVALS. JOINTS CAN BE FORMED BY USING A 1/8 INCH THICK REMOVABLE TEMPLATE OR BY SAWING TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1 INCH. FLUMES LONGER THAN 50 FEET SHALL HAVE PERFORMED EXPANSION JOINTS INSTALLED. 6. IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION, ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE FINAL GRADED AND SEEDED. 7. MAINTENANCE - INSPECT FLUMES AFTER EACH RAINFALL UNTIL ALL AREAS ADJOINING THE FLUME ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE IMMEDIATELY. INSPECT OUTLET AND ROCK RIPRAP TO ASSURE PRESENCE AND STABILITY. ANY MISSING COMPONENTS SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY REPLACED. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE STANDARD SYMBOL SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE PAVED FLUME SYRACUSE. NEW YORK New York Guidelines for Urban Page 5B.34 October 1991-Third Printing Erosion and Sediment Control Figura 5B.17 EXAMPLES OF OUTLET STRUCTURES Virginia Department of Highways and Colorado State University Transportation Rigid Boundary Basin USBR Type IV Basin St.Anthony Falls Stilling Basin ri n '-1. Contra Costa County,Calif. Straight Drop Spillway Stilling Basin October 1991-Third Printing Page SB33 New York Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control 2. On fill slopes the soil adjacent to chute for Flumes longer than 5•et shall have preformed ex- minimum of 5 feet must be well compacted. pansion joints installed. 3. Where drainage filters are placed under the structure 6. Immediately after construction, all disturbed areas the concrete will not be poured on the filter. A plastic will he final graded and seeded. liner, a minimum of 4 mils thick, will be placed to Maintenance prevent contamination of filter layer. 4. Place concrete for the flume to the thickness shown on Inspect flumes after each rainfall until all areas adjoining the plans and finish according to details. Protect the flume are permanently stabilized. Repair all damage freshly poured concrete from extreme temperatures immediately. Inspect outlet and rock riprap to assure (hot or cold)and ensure proper curing. presence and stability. Any missing components should be 5. Form, reinforce, and pour together cutoff walls, immediately replaced. anchor lugs and channel linings. Provide traverse joints to control cracking at 20 foot intervals. Joints can be formed by using a 1/8 inch thick removable template or by sawing to a minimum depth of 1 inch. New York Guidelines for Urban Page 5B32 October 1991-Third Printing Erosion and Sediment Control STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PAVED FLUME Definition Drainage filters - Use a drainage filter with all paved flumes to prevent piping and reduce uplift pressures. Size A small concrete-lined channel to convey water on a rela- of the filter material will be dependent on the soil material tively steep slope. the flume is located in. Purpose Inlet section - Design the inlet to the following minimum dimensions: side walls 2 feet high, length 6 feet, width To convey concentrated runoff safely down the face of a equal to the flume channel bottom, and side slopes the cut or rill slope without causing erosion. same as the flume channel side slopes. Condition Where Practice Applies Outlet section - Outlets must be protected from erosion. Usually an energy dissipator is used to reduce the high Where concentrated storm runoff must be conveyed down chute velocities to lower non erosive velocities. Rock a cut or fill slope as part of a permanent erosion control riprap should be placed at the end of the dissipator to system. Paved flumes serve as stable outlets for diversions, spread flow evenly to the receiving channel. drainage channels, or natural drainageways that are lo- See figure 5B.17 on page 5B.33 for examples of outlet cared above relatively sleep slopes. Paved flumes should structures. be used on slopes of 1:5 to 1 or flatter. Invert - Precast concrete sections may be used in lieu of Design Criteria cast in place concrete. These sections should be designed at the joint to be overlapped to prevent displacement Capacity - Minimum capacity should be the 10 year fre- between sections. Joint sealing compound should be used quency storm. Freeboard or enough bypass capacity to prevent migration of soil through a joint. Cutoff walls should be provided to safeguard the structure from peak and anchor lugs should be cast in the appropriate sections flows expected for the life of the structure. to accomodate the design criteria. Slope-The slope should not be steeper than 1.5:1 (67%). Small Flumes-Where the drainage area is 10 acres or less Cutoff Walls-Install cutoff walls at the beginning and end the design dimensions for concrete flumes may be selected of paved flumes. The cutoff should extend a minimum of from those shown in the following table: 18 inches into the soil and across the full width of the flume Drainage Area(Acres) and be 6 inches thick. Cutoff walls should be reinforced with #3 reinforcing bars (3/8") placed on a 6 inch grid in 5 IQ the center of the wall. Min Bottom Width 4 8 Mchor Lugs-Space anchor lugs a minimum of 10 feet on Min Inlet Depth(ft) 2 2 centers for the length of the flume. They will extend the width of the flume,extend 1 foot into subsoil,be a minimum Min Channel Depth(ft) 1.3 1.3 of 6 inches thick and reinforced with #3 reinforcing bars Max Channel Slope 1.5:1 1.5:1 placed on a 6 inch grid. Concrete-Minimum strength of design mix shall 3000 psi. Max Side Slope 1.5:1 1.5:1 Concrete thickness shall be a minimum of 6 inches rein- See figure 5B.18 on page 5B.34 for details. forced with #3 reinforcing bars. Mix shall be dense, durable, and stiff enough to stay in place on steep slopes Construction Specifications and sufficiently plastic for consolidation. Concrete mix should include an air-entraining admixture to resist freeze- 1. The subgrade shall be constructed to the lines and thaw cycles. grades shown on the plans. Remove all unsuitable material and replace them if necessary with com- Cross Section-Flumes shall have minimum depth of 1 foot pacted stable fill materials. Shape subgrade to with 1.5:1 side slopes. Bottom widths shall be based on uniform surface. Where concrete is poured directly maximum flow capacity. Chutes will be maintained in a on subsoil maintain it in a moist condition. straight alignment because of supercritical flow velocities. October 1991-Third Printing Page 5B.31 New York Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control of the structure.Materials used in construction shall be of Locate emergency bypass areas so floods in excess of, a permanency commensurate with the design frequency structural capacity enters the channel far enough and life expectancy of the practice.Earthfill,when used as downstream so as not to cause damage to the structure. a part of the structure, shall be placed in 4 inch lifts and hand compacted within 2 feet of the structure. Maintenance Seeding, fertilizing and mulching shall conform to the Once properly installed, the maintenance for the grade recommendation specification in Section 3. stabilization structure should be minimal. Inspect the structure periodically and after major storm events. Check Construction operations shall be carried out in such a fill for piping or extreme settlement. Ensure a good vegeta- manner that erosion and air and water pollution will be tive cover. Check the channel for scour or debris and loss minimized. State and local laws concerning pollution of rock from aprons. Repair or replace failing structures abatement shall be complied with. immediately. New York Guidelines for Urban Page 5B.30 October 1991-Third Printing Erosion and Sediment Control STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADE STABILIZATION STRUCTURE Definition will be provided to prevent erosion or scour of both ends of the channel lining. A structure to stabilize the grade or to control head cutting 2. Overfall structures of concrete,metal, rock riprap or in natural or artificial channels. other suitable material is used to lower water from Scoone elevation to another. These structures are ap- plicable'where it is desirable to drop the watercourse This standard applies to all types of grade stabilization elevation over a very short horizontal distance.Ade- structures.It does not apply to storm sewers or their com- orate protection will be provided to prevent erosion ponent parts. or scour upstream, downstream and along sides of overfall structures. Structures should be located on Purpose straight sections of channel with a minimum of 100 feet of straight channel each way. Grade stabilization structures are used to reduce or 3.Pipe drops of metal pipe with suitable inlet and outlet prevent excessive erosion by reduction of velocities and structures.The inletstructure mayconsist of avertical grade in the watercourse or by providing channel linings or section of pipe or similar material,an embankment or structures that can withstand the higher velocities. a combination of both.The outlet structure will pro- vide adequate protection against erosion or scour at Conditions Where Practice Applies the pipe outlet. This practice applies to sites where the capability of earth Capacity and vegetative measures is exceeded in the safe handling Structures which are designed to operate in conjunction of water at permissible velocities,where excessive grades with other erosion control practices shall have as a min- or overfall conditions are encountered or where water is to mum capacity equal to the bankfull capacity of the channel be lowered structurally from one elevation to another. delivering water to the structures. The minimum design These structures should generally be planned and installed capacity for structures that are not designed to perform in along with or as a part of other conservation practices in conjunction with other practices shall be that required to an overall surface water disposal system. handle the peak rate of flow from a 10 year, 24 hour frequency storm or bankfull, whichever is greater. Peak Design Criteria rates of runoff used in determining the capacity require- Compliance with Laws and Regulations mens shall be determined as outlined in Chapter 2, Es- timating Runoff, Engineering Field Manual for Design and construction shall be in compliance with state Conservation Pracd= Section 10 in this manual or by and local laws and regulations. Such compliance is the TR-55.Urban Hydrolva for Small Watersheds. responsibility of the landowner or developer. Set the rest of the structure at an elevation that will stabilize General the grade of the upstream channel. The outlet should be set at an elevation to assure stability. Outlet velocities Designs and specifications shall be prepared for each should be kept within the allowable limits for the receiving structure on an individual job basis depending on its pur- stream. Structural drop spillways need to include a foun- pose,site conditions and the basic criteria of the conserva- dation drainage system to reduce hydrostatic loads. tion practice with which the structure is planned.Typical structures are as follows: Structures which involve the retarding of floodwater or the impoundment of water shall be designed using the criteria 1.Channel linings of concrete,asphalt,half round metal set forth in the guidelines for Ponds or Floodwater Retard- pipe or other suitable lining materials.These linings ing Structures,whichever is applicable. should generally be used where channel velocities exceed safe velocities for vegetated channels due to Construction Specifications increased grade or a change in channel cross section or where durability of vegetative lining is adversely Structures shall be installed according to lines and grades affected by seasonal changes. Adequate protection shown on the plan.The foundation for structures shall be cleared of all undesirable materials prior to the installation October 1991-Third Printing Page 5B.29 New York Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control • Figure 56.16 • Riprap Outlet Protection Example A --j B I E_ld Discharge to Semi- Confined Section (Maximum Tailwater i Condition) N A __j A �I B La Min. depth discharge or tailwater depth, whichever is greater. depth dictated by channel section at end of apron py.—.- "M4— M � Filter cloth or graded aggregate t.oir- w - d + 0.4 La w - d + 0.4 ate, Channel section 4" min. to vary from A-A I d/2 4" to 8-B Filter cloth or See rip rap Filter cloth or graded or aggregate filter standard E aggregate filter specification SECTION B-B (A4 sMJ wFaPetin) SECTION A-A (Aicnd -F cult) New York Guidelines for Urban Page 58.28 October 1991-Third Printing Erosion and Sediment Control Figure 5B.15 Riprap Outlett Protection Example Section View Discharge to confined channel section I I I L - -- Plan View ! La \ Top of rip rap i Top of channel 6" min. downstream channel 0% —}"� invert 3.oniN Filter Cloth Profile View 1.01.0' dor graded aggregate filter Sactw.iVieuj Minimum depth of rip rap maximum depth of flow (downstream normal depth or discharge depth, which ever is greater) Slope to vary from 2:1 at pipe outlet to existing channel 6" slope at end of apron. 4" Filter cloth or graded aggregate filter Width of bottom to vary from 112 pipe diameter at pipe outlet to existing channel bottom at end of apron Section View October 1991-Third Printing Page 5B.27 New York Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control Figure 513.14 Riprap Outlet Protection Example A Profile Discharge to f ` Unconfined Section (flared Outlet) (Minimum Tailwater Condition s � I c W La PLAN VIEW A 6" Min. C Existing d/2 ; Pipe . Stab:lizerd Channel 402 r+i TOE WALL 1.0 Graded Aggrega a Filter or Filter Cllcth PROFILE VIEW Rip rap to be embedded in proposed transition section Original Grad 2 2 4' \�6" Min. Filter Cloth or h Graded Aggregate Filter See Rip rap standard a specifications CROSS SECTION A - A New York Guidelines for Urban Page 513.7.6 October 1991-Third Printing Erosion and Sediment Control • � _ i z _- BEH 7 ! Nei In was w� � - - ■� 'NDN\�����\ ----- ------------ ----------- ------------ __-_-___ __=____-- - = = ________-- -mss- -�• = c- __--___-___--- -_- _ __-______ GGM-MUw_ - w------------u .--.i..---w-.�iw- MCC /.twas 111//N/ as ME ME ME ME on NN tl'/\t/.//////N//////N•. \rasps BE q =n• n nn n I \\G►`GGGGGGgGGGGGGG a ��u. VGGGUGYGG- \\■►�GGGGGGG�GGGGG--"�\\�!■\7S _ _ -e-..=mmumm_____ _ ==_==_. _ GG.---r-.... ..-.v..�'...--..w.. rM�. �1/� ■//////////■ 1\1\lana■///aaaaaaaaa■ Naaaaaaaaaa to/taapaaaaaaaaaaa ,i MEMNON MEMO = =-_______ S C C-- ------- ----- = _ - �------------------------ velocity in the conduit and then substitute the depth of flow Calculation of the downstream channel (by Ms as a diameter to find a discharge equal to full flow for that Equation) indicates a normal depth of 3.1 ft. and normal diameter,in this case 60 inches. velocity of 3.9 fps. Compute velocity: Since the receiving channel is confined,the maximum tail- V = (Q/A) _(600/(5)(10)) = 12 fps water condition controls. Then substituting: Find: discharge using above principles: Q = aL]Y x V = 114(5 x 12 fps = 236 cis Q = a OW x 10 fps = 71 cis 4 4 4 At the intersection of d = 36 in.and Q = 71 cfs,read dso At the intersection of the curve d - 60 in. and Q - 236 — 03 ft. cfs,read d5o — 0.4 ft. Reading the d = 36" curve,read apron length(I*) = 30 Then reading the d — 60 in.curve,read apron length(Le) ft. = 40 ft. Since the maximum flow depth in this reach is 3.1 ft.,that Apron width,W = conduit width + (0.04)(L.) = 10 + is the minimum depth of riprap to be maintained for the (0.4)(40) = 26 ft. entire length. Example3:Open Channel Flow with Discharge to Uncon- Construction Specifications fined Section 1.The subgrade for the filter, riprap or gabion shall be Given: A trapezoidal concrete channel 5 ft.wide with 2:1 prepared to the required lines and grades. Any fill side slopes is flowing 2 ft. deep,Q — 180 cis(velocity — required in the subgrade shall be compacted to a 10 fps) and the tailwater surface downstream is 0.8 ft. density of approximately that of the surrounding un- (minimum tailwater condition). disturbed material. Find: Using similar principles as Example 1, compute 2. The rock or gravel shall conform to the specified equivalent discharge for a 2-foot circular pipe flowing full grading limits when installed respectively in the at 10 feet per second. riprap or filter. Velocity: 3.Filter cloth shall be protected from punching,cutting or tearing. Any damage other than an occasional Q = a($ft)Z x 10 fps = 31.4 cls small hole shall be repaired by placing another piece 4 of cloth over the damaged part or by completely At intersection of the curve,d = 24 in. and Q = 32 cis, replacing the cloth.All overlaps whether for repairs read dw = Ob ft. or for joining two pieces of cloth shall be a minimum of one foot. Then reading the d = 24 in.curve,read apron length(L*) 4.Stone for the riprap or gabion outlets may be placed 20 ft' by equipment.Both shall each be constructed to the Apron width,W = bottom width of channel + 14 — 5 + full course thickness in one operation and in such a 20 = 25 ft. manner as to avoid displacement of underlying materials.The stone for riprap or gabion outlets shall E.3ampkk Pipe flow(partial)with discharge to a confined be delivered and placed in a manner that will insure mon that it is reasonably homogenous with the smaller Given: A 48 in.pipe is discharging with a depth of 3 ft,Q stones and spalls filling the voids between the larger = 100 cis, and discharge velocity of 10 fps (established stones.Riprap shall be placed in a manner to prevent from partial flow analysis)to a confined trapezoidal than- damage to the filter blanket or filter cloth. Hand nel with a 2 ft.bottom,2:1 side slopes,n — .04,and grade placement will be required to the extent necessary to of Oh%. prevent damage to the permanent works. October 1991-Third Printing Page 5B.23 New York Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control Thickness • Gabions shall be fabricain such a manner that the sides, ends,and lid can be assembled at the construction site into The minimum thickness of the riprap layer shall be 1.5 times the maximum stone diameter for dso of 15 inches or a rectangular basket ru the specified sins. lined ac shall be of single unit construction and shall be installed accord- less;and 1.2 times the maximum stone size for dso greater mg to manufacturers recommendations. than 15 inches.The following chart lists some examples: The area on which the gabion is to be installed shall be Mummum graded as shown on the drawings.Foundation conditions Dso dam Blanket Thickness shall be the same as for placing rock riprap and filter cloth (enches) lic1 shall be placed under all gabions. Where required,a key 4 6 9 may be needed to prevent undermining of the main gabion 6 9 14 structure. 9 14 20 Maintenance 12 18 27 15 22 32 Once a riprap outlet has been installed, the maintenance 18 27 32 needs are very low.It should be inspected after high flows 21 32 38 to see if scour beneath the riprap has occurred, or any 24 36 43 stones have been dislodged.Repairs should be made im- mediately. Stone Quality Design Procedure Stone for riprap shall consist of field stone or rough un- 1. Investigate the downstream channel to assure that hewn quarry stone.The stone shall be hard and angular and non-erosive velocities can be maintained. of a quality that will not disintegrate on exposure to water 2. Determine the tailwater condition at the outlet to or weathering.The specific gravity of the individual stones establish which curve to use. shall be at least 2.5. 3. Enter the appropriate chart with the depth of flow and Recycled concrete equivalent may be used provided it has discharge velocity to determine the riprap size and a density of at least I% pounds per cubic foot, and does apron length required.It is noted that references to not have any exposed steel or reinforcing bars. pipe diameters in the charts are based on full flow. For other than full pipe flow,the parameters of depth Filter of flow and velocity must be used. A filter is a layer of material placed between the riprap and 4. Calculate apron width at the downstream end if a the underlying soil surface to prevent soil movement into flared section is to be employed. and through the riprap. Riprap shall have a filter placed Examples under it in all cases. A filter can be of two general forms: A Example-1-Pipe Flow(full)with discharge to unconfined g gravel layer or a section. plastic filter cloth.The plastic filter cloth can be woven or non-woven monofilament yarns,and shall meet these base Given:A circular conduit flowing full. requirements: thickness 20-60 mils, grab strength 90-120 Q = 280 cis, diam. = 66 in., tailwater surface is 2 . lbs; and shall conform to ASTM D-1777 and ASTM D- above pipe invert(minimum tailwater condition). ft Gravel filter blanket when used shall be designed by com- Find: Read dso = 1.2 and apron length(I,) = 38 ft. paring particle sizes of the overlying material and the base Apron width = diam. + L, = 5B.5 + 38 = 43.5 ft. material. Design criteria are available in Standard and Use:dso = 15",dmm = 22",blanket thickness = 32" Specification for Riprap Slope Protection,page 5B.55. Gabions Example,2:Box Flow(partial)with high tailwater Gabions shall be made of hexagonal triple twist mesh with Given:A box conduit discharging under partial flow con- ditions.dimen- sion A concrete box 5.5 ft.x 10 fl.flowing 5.0 ft.deep, of the mesh opening shall not exceed 41/2 inches and Q = 600 cis and tailwater surface is 5 ft. above invert the area of the mesh opening shall not exceed 10 square (max tailwater condition). inches. Since this is not full pipe flow and does not directly fit the nomograph assumptions, it is necessary to compute the New York Guidelines for Urban Page 5B.22 October 1991-Third Printing Erosion and Sediment Control STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROCK OUTLET PROTECTION Definition Minimum Tailwater Condition;see Figure 513.14 on page A section of rock protection placed at the outlet end of the culverts,conduits or channels. 513.26 as an example.If the tailwater depth is greater than half the pipe diameter and the receiving stream will con- Purpose tine to confine the flow,it shall be classified as a Maximum Tailwater Condition;see Figures 5B.15 and 513.16 on pages The purpose of the rock outlet protection is to reduce the 5B.27 and 5B.28 as an example.Pipes which outlet onto flat depth,velocity,and energy of water,such that the flow will areas with no defined channel may be assumed to have a not erode the receiving downstream reach. Minimum Tailwater Condition;see Figure 513.14 on page 5B.26 as an example. Scope Apron Size This standard applies to the planning, design, and con- The apron length and width shall be determined from the struction of rock riprap and gabions for protection of curves according to the tailwater conditions: downstream areas. It does not apply to rock lining of channels or streams. Minimum Tailwater-Use Figure 5B.12 on page 511.24 Conditions Where Practice Applies Maximum Tailwater-Use Figure 5B.13 on page 5B.25 If the pipe discharges directly into a well defined channel, This practice applies where discharge velocities and ener- the apron shall extend across the channel bottom and up gies at the outlets of culverts, conduits or channels are the channel banks to an elevation one foot above the sufficient toerode the next downstream reach.This applies maximum tailwater depth or to the top of the bank, to: whichever is less. 1.Culvert outlets of all types. The upstream end of the apron,adjacent to the pipe shall 2.Pipe conduits from all sediment basins,dry storm water have a width two(2)times the diameter of the outlet pipe, ponds,and permanent type ponds. or conform to pipe end section if used. 3.New channels constructed as outlets for culverts and Bottom Grade conduits. The outlet protection apron shall be constructed with no Design Criteria slope along its length.There shall be no overfall at the end of the apron.The elevation of the downstream end of the The design of rock outlet protection depends entirely on apron shall be equal to the elevation of the receiving chan- the location. Pipe outlets at the top of cuts or on slopes nel or adjacent ground. steeper than 10 percent, cannot be protected by rock aprons or riprap sections due to reconcentration of flows Alignment and high velocities encountered after the flow leaves the The outlet protection apron shall be located so that there apron. are no bends in the horizontal alignment. Many counties and state agencies have regulations and Materials design procedures already established for dimensions,type and size of materials,and locations where outlet protection The outlet protection may be done using rock riprap, is required.Where these requirements exist,they shall be grouted riprap or gabions. followed. Riprap shall be composed of a well graded mixture of stone Tailwater depth size so that 50 percent of the pieces, by weight, shall be larger than the dso size determined by using the charts.A The depth of tailwater immediately below the pipe outlet well graded mixture as used herein is defined as a mixture must be determined for the design capacity of the pipe.If composed primarily of larger stone sizes but with a suffi- the tailwater depth is less than half the diameter of the cient mixture of other sizes to fill the smaller voids between outlet pipe and the receiving stream is wide enough to the stones.The diameter of the largest stone size in such a accept divergence of the flow,it shall be classified as a mixture shall be 1.5 times the d5o size. October 1991-Third Printing Page 513.21 New York Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control 3LANNING BOARD MEMBEA* : y.-�gUFFO��- RICHARD G.WARD .% �� CQG Town Hall, 53095 Ma' Chairman 4 �� '1-A P.O. Box 117E GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. c Southold, New York 11` BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. W Fax (516) 765-3136 WILLIAM J. CREMERS O Telephone (516) 765-19 KENNETH L.EDWARDS # PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 1, 1996 B. Anthony Aliperti P.O. BOX 149 Shirley, NY 11967 Re: Proposed major subdivision for Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, September 30, 1996: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an additional retroactive six month extension of sketch approval from August 6, 1996 to February 6, 1997. Conditional sketch approval was granted on February 6, 1995. The Planning Board has extended the sketch approval for an additional six months to allow the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan to be completed and reviewed. All conditions of sketch approval must be addressed and a complete preliminary submission must be made prior to the expiration date or the sketch plan will expire. The Planning Board's letters of May 2, 1996 and February 7, 1995 outline the information which must be addressed in the preliminary submission. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward ; Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS RICHARD G.WARD p�� C�-. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Chairman J:'�� G2 P.O. Box 1179 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. t Southold, New York 11971 w BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. 2 Fax (516) 765-3136 y, '. T j WILLIAM J.CREMERS Telephone (516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 12, 1996 Allan Connell USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service Riverhead County Center Room E-16 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Connell: In June 1996, you reviewed an Erosion and Sediment control Plan for the above mentioned subdivision. You made several comments and suggestions regarding the plan which the Planning Board forwarded to the applicant. I have enclosed a copy of a revised Erosion and Sediment Control Plan which was received by the Planning Board on September 9, 1996. The Planning Board would like your professional opinion in regard to the proposed plan. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Please contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Melissa Spiro Planner enc. ms September 5, 1996 Melissa Spiro, Planner Southold Town Planning Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed major subdivision, Aliperti Estates Dear Melissa: Enclosed herewith is the updated Erosion and Sediment Control Plan with changes made in accordance with Mr. Allan Connell's comments from his letter dated June 3, 1996. 1 hope that this plan can be reviewed by your office and Mr. Connell as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at work (516) 348-7600 or at my home (516) 821-3849. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Michael Aliperti cc. Anthony Aliperti s aX S P 9 ., ALIPERTI ESTATES DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR ALIPERTI ESTATES Drainage for the ALIPERTI Estates has been considered as required by the regulatory and local agencies. Consideration for the undeveloped areas next to the ALIPERTI Estates was also taken into account. Watershed area encompassing the existing ALIPERTI Estates was obtained from the regulatory authorities. AVAILABLE INFORMATION ON ALIPERTI ESTATES: Total Drainage Area = This is the total drainage area encompassing the ALIPERTI Estates which will be contributing rainfall on to ALIPERTI Estates. 19.02 Acres Effective Drainage Area = This is considered as the area of the ALIPERTI Estates where the soil cover and effective drainage can be controlled by proper design and construction methods. = 19.02 Acres Design Rainfall = 5 inch rainfall over 24 hour period. Using the Town of Southhold drainage design criteria, as stated in the code Section A108-28, applying the formulae to the site specific: Volume required for a drainage in cubic feet Vc=A*R*C cubic feet. Where Vc= Volume capacity in cubic feet A= Tributary drainage area in square feet within the subdivision and shall include areas outside the subdivision if necessary. 19.03 Acres R= Five inch rainfall C= Weighted coefficient for runoff of the drainage area (C=0.3) Vc= 19.03*43560sgft/acre*(5"/12")*0.30 Vc= 103,618.35 cubic feet Volume of the recharge basin as provided on Aliperiti estates: Vr= Ar (Area of recharge basin)* Dr (depth of recharge basin) Where Ar= Area of recharge basin is calculated using a planimeter. Planimetric area of the recharge basin 30600 square feet. Dr = Depth of recharge basin 6.0 feet(Elevation difference between maximum contour to min contour Depth) Vr = 39600 sgfeet*6feet average depth Vr = 237,600.0 cubic feet Findings: From the above calculations, it is apparent that the Volume provided by the recharge basin is adequate for providing capacity for the storage of the runoff from drainage area as shown on the plans. Volume of Recharge basin area>Volume of runoff from the drainage area. Hence O.K. LANDSCAPE PLAN INTRODUCTION This landscape plan has been developed for Aliperti Estates (AE) . The purpose of this landscape plan is to provide a vegetative cover over the existing soil materials existing for the AE area in order to reduce erosion, stabilize the side slopes, protect the existing soil materials, and provide a recharge basin to control runoff on-site. The landscape plan has been developed in two phases. The two (2) phases of development scheduled for AE are considered, namely, the construction phase and the final phase. Every effort is made so that the landscaping of AE will be consistent with and complimentary to plantings around the subject property. Information regarding the drainage calculations is calculated in the text entitled, ALIPERTI ESTATES, Drainage Considerations and Calculations for Aliperti Estates . All plant materials have been selected which are adaptable to Long Island climatic conditions and to the existing soil materials. In addition, the seed mixtures which are proposed have been chosen because of their ability to provide adequate vegetative cover for the desired life expectancy of each development phase. 1 PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS AND RATIONALE The types of soil material and length of exposure will vary through each of the different phases of construction, and the final phase . Several different seed mixtures were selected with input from the USDA Soil Conservation Service to stabilize the exposed slopes during the different site development conditions and level of service expected on AE property. The following list includes both interim and permanent seed mixtures . The term "interim" is used loosely and refers to a seed mixture which is expected to provide relatively short-term vegetative coverage (two to four years) , during the site development for the soil materials . This is discussed in further detail later. 2 The following seed mixtures are labeled A, B, C, and D. These areas where mixtures are to be placed are shown on the Plan for Erosion Control (enclosed) . This plan is divided into three sections : 1) Site Grading Plan; 2) Erosion Control Plan; and 3) Erosion Control Final Phase . The Erosion Control Final Phase plan shows the areas (A, B, C, D) . The list below depicts the planting types . A. Beach area B. Bluff (no mowing) C. Swale (no mowing) D. Ground Area PROPOSED SEED MIXTURES Application Rate Varietv (lbs . /acre) A. Beach Area American Beachgrass 1 , 345 culms/1000 sq. ft . B. Bluff American Beachgrass 1, 345 culms/1000 sq. ft . "Blackwell" Switchgrass 2 PLS "Atlantic" Coastal Panicgrass 2 PLS "Niagara" Big Bluestem 3 PLS "Aldous" or "Camper" Little Bluestem 2 PLS "Caucasian" Bluestem 2 PLS Sand Lovegrass 2 PLS "Goldstrike" Sand Bluestem 2 PLS C. Swale Creeping Red Fescue 10 lb/ac "Lathco" Flatpea 25 lb/ac "Lancer" Perennial Pea 5 lb/ac "Arid" or "Apache" Tall Fescue 15 lb/ac Redtop 10 lb/ac D. Ground Area American Beachgrass 1, 345 culms/1000 sq. ft . "Blackwell" Switchgrass 2 PLS "Atlantic" Coastal Panicgrass 2 PLS "Niagara" Big Bluestem 3 PLS "Aldous" or "Camper" Little Bluestem 2 PLS "Caucasian" Bluestem 2 PLS Sand Lovegrass 2 PLS continued on next page 3 "Goldstrike" Sand Bluestem 2 PLS Kentucky Bluegrass 20 lb/ac Creeping Red Fescue 20 lb/ac Perennial Ryegrass 5 lb/ac ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * PLS = Pure Live Seed where : 100 x lbs of 100 % PLS Seed Required = Actual lbs of commercial PLS of Commercial Seed Being Used seed to be used **Trefoil seeds must be inoculated at four times the manufacturer' s recommended rate when hydroseeding. Although both the Bluff mix (B) and the Swale mix (C) are for permanent cover establishment, there are several differences between these two mixtures in terms of maintenance. Mixture B contains warm season grasses which are typically associated with native prairies and are well adapted to droughty, low fertility, sandy sites . This mixture contains grasses that will germinate within 10 days given the proper moisture conditions (such as sand lovegrass) , while others are slower to develop and produce primarily root growth during the first year. If newly established plants do not appear vigorous after the first growing season, 300 lbs of 15-10-10 fertilizer will be applied in June, one year after seeding. After two years, the vegetative growth should be fully established and will require little to no future maintenance . Spring seeding dates are recommended for best establishment of this B mixture, for the period between March 15th through May 15th. This mixture was recommended by the USDA Soil Conservation Service for soil stabilization on abandoned sand and gravel pits . The swale mix (C) contains cool season grasses which are typically associated with lawn or turf areas; and also contains a nitrogen- 4 fixing legume (Perennial Pea and Flatpea) . The grasses will show up within the first growing season, however, the peas will be slow to establish and may appear by the second or third year. Since this is a more typical turf-type mixture, it will require annual fall (topdressing) applications of 200 lbs/acre of 10-10-10 fertilizer for the first 2 to 3 years . This mixture is slightly less tolerant of low fertilizer and maintenance conditions than (B) and may also require supplemental irrigation during droughty spells for successful establishment . Fall seeding dates are recommended for best establishment of this P#2 mixture, for the period between August 15th through September 30th. Summer seedings (between May 16th through August 14th) and winter seedings (between October 1st through March 14th) are not recommended. A temporary erosion control measure is proposed during these periods . This includes the application of two (2) tons per acre of shredded straw mulch followed by a chemical spray tackifier, such as Terra Tack II, or equivalent (A straw or coconut fiber with photodegradable plastic net on both sides should be utilized as an erosion control blanket after grading and seeding. This Blanket should be stapled in place on the side slopes of the swale) . As with the above grass mixtures, shrubs and woody plant material chosen for AE must be extremely hardy, shallow rooted and able to withstand drought conditions . The following is a list of trees and shrubs which may be incorporated into future detailed landscaped plans for the final development of AE. The majority of these 5 plants have been identified as volunteer species or landscape plants which are growing successfully on Long Island. All species are adaptable to the growing conditions expected at the this site, and several are indigenous to the area. These woody plants will be utilized to provide wildlife habitat, to visually "break-up" the side slopes, and otherwise improve the aesthetics by adding seasonal color. Shrubs may be planted on small berms and in areas where the depth of the rooting medium is four (4) feet or greater. Trees will be utilized primarily at the edges of the road/beach to provide a natural buffer/screening effect . Proposed Shrubs and Trees Shrubs Trees Autumn Olive E. Red Cedar Staghorn and Fragrant Sumac Shadbush Rugosa Rose Black Locust Northern Bayberry Norway Spruce Bristly Locust Limber Pine Virginia Creeper White Pine SITE DEVELOPMENT AND PLANTING SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION PHASE : The NORTHERN/OUTER FACE and the SOUTHERN FACE will be hydroseeded with seed mixture (see Erosion Control Plan and Erosion Control Final Phase) , and the inner face areas will be hydroseeded with permanent seed mixture, (B) , if construction is completed during the normal growing season (between March 15th through May 15th and August 15th through September 30th) 6 However, if construction is completed during the summer (May 16th through August 14th) or winter (October 1st through March 14th) seasons, these areas will be temporarily mulched to control soil erosion until the next consecutive growing season. The temporary mulch cover will then be raked off or otherwise stripped immediately prior to hydroseeding. The soil will be tested prior to the addition of lime and fertilizer to ensure that the appropriate amounts are spread utilizing a lime spreader. The hydroseeder slurry will contain the appropriate seed mixture, fertilizer (600 lbs/acre of 5-10-10) and green-dyed wood fiber cellulose (500 lbs/acre) . Immediately after hydroseeding, all treated surfaces will be tracked with a bulldozer to ensure adequate seed/soil contact for germination. Finally, the treated areas will be hydromulched with wood fiber cellulose at 3000 lbs/acre. The entire NORTHERN FACE and the majority of the SOUTHERN FACE will remain essentially undisturbed throughout the sequential construction of the development . These areas are therefor proposed to be permanently seeded. Grassy vegetation and low ground cover growing on the side slopes will not affect the integrity of the existing ground cover and ground conditions . The soil material existing over the subject area consists primarily of sands with little or no organic matter. Unless 7 it is suitably stabilized, erosion of the protective soil cover material on the inner face is expected to be severe . Hydroseeding with the same mixture specified for the bluff (See page 3) is proposed to stabilize this slope and SOUTHERN area. A permanent mixture was chosen rather than an interim mixture, because it is anticipated that the term of extended coverage will range from three (3) to approximately twenty (20) years . The establishment of a vegetative cover is expected to sustain or improve the specified permeability rate for the protective soil cover material . This is based on experiments performed by the U.S. Geological Survey (U. S.G. S. Water Resources Investigations Report 85-4323 , 1987) in which infiltration rates were measured on seven (7) recharge basins in Nassau County. Three (3) of these basins were permitted to grow natural vegetation throughout the testing period. All three basins reportedly sustained high infiltration rates . Although the experiment did not directly assess the effects of vegetation, the report states that the root systems created a network of flow channels which was the probable cause of the high inflow rates . The permanent seed mixture B, was selected for its ability to withstand the droughty soil conditions expected on the Southern innerface areas. This seed mixture contains grasses that will germinate quickly (within 10 days given the proper moisture conditions) and others which are slower to develop to 8 provide longer term coverage. FINAL PHASE During the final site development, a minimum 6-inch thick growing medium of specified topsoil or a 1 : 1 mixture of graded sand/composted leaf mulch will be placed. The newly placed top soil surface area will then be hydroseeded during the growing season with the above mentioned seed mixtures (page 3) . In addition, woody plant materials may be established on small planting berms and will be created to beautify the area. Maintenance will be limited to topdressing with fertilizer (the first year after seeding for seed mixture (B) , or for the first two to three years after seeding for seed mixture (C) , immediate repair of any areas damaged by erosion or other disturbance and replacement of dead plant stock. No other maintenance activities are expected. 9 S- - T I_t E 1 _ 4 C i=l S H i N N'__:U C S r-a T E=: F C H G U F' F' . 0 1 Melissa Spiro, Planner Southold "Coen Plannine 017icc P.Q. Box 11',9 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Proposed major subdivision, �lihcrii (Isttttes Dear Mclissa: Pursuant to our telephone cot.%ers:uioo, 1 :uu tiv:iti; ; io you t;l request an extension of lime for the above rel'crenecd project. As you are alrcatiJ.v akar,-, 14ubtuitted the Erosion and SCllimCtlt Control Plan for your review. '1'lie report was then :;enl to Mr Allan S. Connell of the U.S Department of Agriculture by your of'fico and taen t'clll+'nC. l tonw. After trying several methods to comply with your and Mr Connell' request•;. it is evu!cut tilt a recharge basin is the hest m:ahod to handle the possiblc runutl' Ihim my i.-.i,.,,n rain cv,,,w. I Will be Submitting; the %) ,iscd l'roN;( i ijml l JiniLn( ;Mall ai ipproximatC)y OCC to two wceks, If you have am, ctuestions or cunununu, pleas;_ .!o not lics,'tirlc to contact me at work: at (516) 343-7604 or at my hone at (.510) 3- Again, ,hank you Ior your considcration. Very truly yours. Michael Aliperti cc. Anthony Allperti i IN SEP 41996 ( ' r .vs d ANNING BOARD MEMBERS S RICHARD G.WARD jY�L� CQ� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road y h� oy� P.O. Box 1179 Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Southold, New York 11971 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. W Fax (516) 765-3136 WILLIAM J. CREMERS Telephone (516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS ��! PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 1Z, 1996 B. Anthony Aliperti Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan submitted on May 7, 1996, was reviewed by Allan Connell of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Mr. Connell outlined, in a report dated June 3, 1996, items that should be revised or included in the plan. I have enclosed a copy of Mr. Connell's report. The Planning Board is requiring that you comply with the items outlined in the report. The revised Erosion and Sediment Control Plan must be submitted as part of the preliminary submission. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Siinncceerelyy,, rd✓ G" �eliSssa plreclfl- Planner enc. (Formerly) Natural Resources Conservation Service ural n of cConeemilon Riverhead County Center A90c„R,,,• evMce 300 Center Drive, Room B-16 Riverhead, New York 11901-3398 516-727-2315 FX:516-727-3160 June 3 , 1996 ra r r, Melissa Spiro, Planner �� I'• �) Southold Town Planning Office P.O. Box 1179 JIJN 4 Southold, NY 11971 i Dear Melissa: I have reviewed the erosion and sediment control plan for the Aliperti Estates subdivision and have the following comments: First, the assumptions made in the drainage calculations are. in- correct . It appears that the applicant is assuming that because the permeability of the soil is greater than the rate of the rain- fall, there will be no runoff . There are many factors which ef- fect the runoff potential of a site, besides infiltration charac- teristics related to soil type. These include slope, amount of impervious area, cover type, surface retention and the roughness of flow surfaces. A bare soil will produce more runoff than a soil with a good grass cover. The ability of the soil to absorb the rainfall, or its intake rate, is often exceeded as the inten- sity of the rainfall increases and produces runoff . The rational method used by the applicant to calculate runoff actually takes these factors into account. The Q value calculated is the amount of runoff generated from the storm intensity used. Drainage structures such as catch basins, culvert pipes and leaching pools should be designed to handle the runoff generated from a specific rainfall event as determined by the town. Plans to control runoff must be included as part of the total erosion and sediment control plan. The applicant does a suitable job in describing the permanent veg- etative measures that will be used to control erosion. I would suggest that the temporary erosion control measures include tempo- rary seedings of Annual ryegrass 0 30 LBS. per acre for areas that will remain unvegetated during the period from May 30th through August 15th and Winter rye 0 100 LBS. per acre for late fall seed- ings in October and November . The seed mixtures specified for areas A-C are acceptable except that American Beachgrass should be included for Area B. The beachgrass should be planted prior to April lat . The warm season seed mixture can then be hydroseeded onto the bluff face between April 1st and June 15th. It is questionable whether birdsfoot trefoil can withstand salt spray and may not survive on the bluff face. (Formerly) The 84cc-no I'll The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Is".ao�or of r» +a»V 10-79 DpvhnWM w Aprkunwe AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 0 -2- Area D should not be planted to lawn grasses; the seed mixture proposed for B would be more appropriate. An erosion control blanket should be stapled in place on the side slopes of the swale after grading and seeding. Suitable materials include straw or coconut fiber or a combination of the two with a photodegradable plastic net on both sides. The proposed list of shrubs and trees is acceptable except that the applicant should be aware that Autumn Olive spreads rapidly and can become a nuisance plant. It is salt tolerant and provides excellent summer screening; site selection is critical however. On page 6 under Site Development and Planting Schedule, it states that the Northern/Outer Face and Southern Face will be hydroseeded with seed mixture (mentioned above ) . It is not clear what seed mixture will be used where. The last sentence on page 6 indicates that the hydroseeder slurry will contain adequate lime to attain a pH between 5. 5 to 6. 0. This would be impossible to achieve using a hydroseeder. The soil should be tested and lime and fertilizer applied according to soil test results. The lime will have to be spread using a lime spreader . On page 7 last paragraph, the second sentence states that seed mixture #1 is proposed to stabilize the inner face and southern area. What is seed mixture #1? If it is the seed mixture specified for the bluff, then that would be acceptable. In summary, the erosion and sediment control plan lacks a runoff management plan showing structural measures that will be used to control runoff onsite. It is also unclear which seed mixture will be used where since they are referred to by number and letter in the text . The Erosion Control Plan specifies the bluff mixture for the inner and southern face while the Erosion Control Final Phase calls for the lawn mixture for the same area. This needs to be clarified. If I can be of further assistance, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �� Allan S. Connell District Conservationist ASCagc .NNING BOARD MEMBEA S� 0 RICHARD G.WARD � �� C� � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Z` G P.O. Box 1179 Chairman 'yam yam , Southold, New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATH",JR. y U BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. " H 2 Fax(516) 765-3136 WILLIAM J. CREMERS O -VI Telephone(516) 765-1935 KENNETH L.EDWARDS v�ijJQ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 8, 1996 Allan Connell USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service Riverhead County Center Room E-16 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Connell: In July 1995, you reviewed an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the above mentioned subdivision. You made several comments and suggestions regarding the plan which the Planning Board forwarded to the applicant. I have enclosed a copy of a revised Erosion and Sediment Control Plan which was received by the Planning Board on May 7, 1996. The Planning Board would like your professional opinion in regard to the proposed plan. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Please contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, MelissaSplr Planner enc. �bJ May 7 , 1996 Melissa Spiro, Planner Planning Board office Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Proposed Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM # 1000-95-1-3 Dear Ms. Spiro: The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan prepared for the above mentioned subdivision has been completed in accordance with Mr. Allan Connell ' s requests, and is ready for review. Enclosed please find a plan for Erosion Control which contains a Site Grading Plan, Erosion Control Plan, and an Erosion Control Final Phase Plan. Also enclosed are write-ups for drainage calculations, and a landscape plan. This proposed subdivision plan has been completed to meet Mr. Connell 's requests. I would appreciate an expedited review if possible. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank you again for your consideration in awarding an extension so the work can be completed. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (516) 821-3849 . Very truly yours, '��� Michael Aliperti Project Manager MAY 7 (f, ALIPERTI ESTATES DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR ALIPERTI ESTATES Drainage for the ALIPERTI Estates has been considered as required by the regulatory and local agencies. Consideration for the undeveloped areas next to the ALIPERTI Estates was also taken into account. Watershed area encompassing the existing ALIPERTI Estates was obtained from the regulatory authorities. Drainage on ALIPERTI Estates is analyzed in a Two phase approach. The two phases being; 1: Drainage during the construction Phase, and 2, Final Phase (after development of the property). AVAILABLE INFORMATION ON ALIPERTI ESTATES: Total Drainage Area = This is the total drainage area encompassing the ALIPERTI Estates which will be contributing rainfall on to ALIPERTI Estates. = 19.02 Acres Effective Drainage Area = This is considered as the area of the ALIPERTI Estates where the soil cover and effective drainage can be controlled by proper design and construction methods. 9.23 Acres Design Rainfall = 5 inch rainfall over 24 hour period. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATION DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF ALIPERTI ESTATES During the construction phase,the contractor shall perform the grading of the entire site of the ALIPERTI Estates as proposed in the enclosed plans. The contractor shall implement all necessary erosion control measures such as the installation of temporary hay bales, silt fences and temporary drainage structures if needed. Erosion control devices shall be maintained in operation until the final erosion control plan is implemented for the ALIPERTI Estates. The following are the calculations for the drainage during the construction phase: During the construction phase, since the contractor's operation will be limited on ALIPERTI Estates and not on the properties adjacent to ALIPERTI Estates, drainage calculations are performed keeping this criteria. It is known that the neighboring properties adjacent to ALIPERTI Estates is undeveloped. Therefore, the permeability of 1 the existing soil materials is considered as moderately permeable soil materials. Permeability of moderate sandy soils with no ground cover is considered moderate with rates ranging between 0.2 - 0.6 "/hr( Reference #1). Use 0.3 "/hr as a reasonable estimate. Area 1 = Drainage Area west of ALIPERTI Estates (See Figure #1 and #2) Area 3 = Drainage Area of ALIPERTI Estates (See Figure#1 and#2) Area 2 = Drainage Area east of ALIPERTI Estates (See Figure #1 and#2) Watershed area= Area 1 +Area 2 + Area 3 Total drainage Area = 19.02 Acres Total drainage area of the neighboring properties Area I +Area 2 A" = 9.79 acres Total Discharge from neighboring properties= Q = CIA C= Using C=1 for the worst case scenario, assuming the properties will be undeveloped for a long time. I= intensity of the rain, 5" rainfall over a 24 hour duration. A= Area in Acres CALCULATIONS USING ENGINEERING APPROACH Rainfall rate on neighboring property _(5"/24 hours) * Total area A" =2.04 inches/hour/acre Permeability of undeveloped properties adjacent to ALIPERTI properties, considering the soil to moderately permeable sandy material with no established ground cover, Using permeability of sandy material as 0.3"/hr. _(0.3") * Total area A" =2.93"/Acre i.e. 2.93"/Acre>2.04"/Acre which infers as Permeability of existing sandy material>Rate of rainfall on neighboring properties. 2 CALCULATIONS USING RATIONAL METHOD For worst case scenario, use C = 1. Q = 1*5*9.79 efs 48.95 efs Permeability of undeveloped properties adjacent to ALIPERTI properties I=permeability =0.3"/hour= 7.2" over a 24 hour duration Total permeability of undeveloped ground cover of neighboring properties adjacent properties Using C=.S for a worst case scenario Q =CIA =0.5*7.2"*9.79 Acres =35.24 cfs Therefore the permeability of the ground cover of the neighboring properties is greater than that the rainfall occurring on the property. Hence O.R. As used in normal good engineering construction methods, the Contractor shall utilize all preventive methods to control effects of wind blowing the soil material from the neighboring properties onto ALIPERTI Estates. The contractor shall install silt fences to control the soil material drifts. The Contractor shall also utilize other preventive measures such as hay bales with proper anchoring methods to control any runoff as a result of change in soil condition. DRAINAGE ON ALIPERTI ESTATES During the construction phase, since the contractor will be regrading the entire site, there will be no established ground cover. Moderately permeable sandy material will be exposed during this phase of construction activity. Permeability of sandy material is greater than the rate of the of rainfall intensity. Total Drainage Area of ALIPERTI Estates 9.23 Acres 3 CALCULATIONS USING RATIONAL METHOD Using C = 1 for worst case scenario Q = 1*5*9.23 cfs = 46.15 cfs Permeability of undeveloped ALIPERTI Estates properties I=Permeability= 0.3"/hour= 7.2" over a 24 hour duration Total permeability of undeveloped ground cover of ALIPERTI Estates properties Using C=.5 for a worst case scenario Q =CIA =0.5*7.2"*9.23 Acres = 33.23 cfs Which indicates that the permeability of soil material during the construction phase is greater that the rate of rainfall occurring over ALIPERTI Estates Properties. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATION DURING THE FINAL PHASE OF ALIPERTI ESTATES During the final phase after all the construction is completed and an erosion control plan has been established the contractor shall implement all necessary erosion control measures such as hay bales and silt fences as shown the plans until the neighboring properties have been developed. Erosion control devices shall be maintained in operation until the final erosion control plan is fully established. The following are the calculation for the drainage during the final phase: During the final phase, since ALIPERTI Estates will be developed and the adjacent properties to ALIPERTI Estates will be undeveloped for unknown specified time, the drainage calculation are performed keeping this criteria established. Therefore, the permeability of the existing soil materials is considered as moderately permeable soil materials for adjacent properties with Permeability of sandy material with no ground cover is documented with rates greater than 0.3"/hr( Reference #1). ALIPERTI Estates will be developed in accordance with the described. The coefficient for runoff'C' will be treated as 0.5, i.e. with effective ground cover well established. Area 1 = Drainage Area west of ALIPERTI Estates (See Figure #1 and#2) Area 2 = Drainage Area of ALIPERTI Estates (See Figure#1 and #2) Area 3 = Drainage Area east of ALIPERTI Estates (See Figure #1 and#2) Watershed area AA= Area 1 +Area 2 +Area 3 4 Total drainage of the watershed area AA = 1*5"*2.05 +0.5*5"*9.23 + 1*5"*7.74 72 cfs Permeability of Watershed area = 1*7.2*2.05 +-0.5*7.2*9.23 + 1*7.2*7.74 103.72 cfs Hence 103.72>72 The permeability of the drainage area even after the final construction phase is fully developed is greater than the rainfall intensity rate with the existing soil ground cover materials on adjacent properties next to ALIPERTI estates. However, the erosion control devices shall be maintained in accordance with the plan as described since the calculations do not address the wind blowing and soil material drifting. 5 REFERENCE: 1. A Guide for interpreting Engineering uses of Soils. U.S. Department of Agriculture 2. A Guide to Conservation Plantings on Critical Erosion Areas by U.S. Department of Agriculture,Soil Conservation Service. 3. Soil Survey of Suffolk County, NY. United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service in Cooperation with Cornell Agriculture Experiment Station 6 REFERENCE # 1 Columns 12 and 13.—Li uid limit (column 12) 1, and Plasticitv index (col? l3) . If knowledge is such that liquid limit and plasticity index can be estimated, enter the estimates in the respective columns. Express estimates as ranges of values; enter "NP" for soils thatarmined re nonplastic. Hake entries in these column$ only if laboratory- de liquid limit and plasticity index are available for enough notsoils so have to be entries are reliable estimates. The laboratory data for soils in the survey area, but, if not, they must be for soils like those in the survey area. Omit these columns if reliable estimates can- not be made for most soils in the survey area. Column 14.--Permeability. Soil permeability is that quality of soil that enables it to transmit water and air. Accepted as a measure of this quality is the rate at which soil transmits water while saturated. That rate is the "saturated hydraulic conductivity" of soil physics. In line with conventional usage in the engineering profession and tra- ditional usage in the published soil surveys, this rate of flow, prin- cipally downward, continues to be expressed as "permeability." The definition and basis for estimating permeability should be given in the Glossary in published soil surveys. Use a footnote to direct readers to the glossary. To rate soil permeability; use the numerical ranges shown below: Permeability class Numerical range (inches per hour) 1 iVery slow Less than 0.06 Slow 0.06-0.2 Moderately slow 0.2-0.6 Moderate 0.6-2.0 Moderately rapid 2.0-6.0 !, Rapid 6.0-20 Very rapid More than 20 Column 15 --Available water eapacity. Express available water capacity In inches of water per inch of soil. Limit entries to values considered reliable. Use a range to indicate a span of capacity, e.g. , 0.15-0.17. Caution: Base estimates not only on soil texture, making appropriate adjustment for coarse fragments,but also on structure, consistence, and bulk density. Do not enter estimates of available water capacity for hardpans or other dense layers from which roots are excluded, and do not enter estimates for soil layers below them either. Instead, enter a reference to a footnote which explains that roots of most plants are excluded from these layers and water in them therefore is not available to plants. In some dense layers, as in many fragipans, root penetration is restric- ted and roots are not altogether excluded. Enter estimates for such LANDSCAPE PLAN MAY T M6 INTRODUCTION This landscape plan has been developed for Aliperti Estates (AE) . The purpose of this landscape plan is to provide a vegetative cover over the existing soil materials existing for the AE area in order to reduce erosion, stabilize the side slopes and otherwise protect the existing soil materials . The landscape plan has been developed in two phases . The two (2) phases of development scheduled for AE are considered, namely, the construction phase and the final phase . Every effort is made so that the landscaping of AE will be consistent with and complimentary to plantings around the subject property. All plant materials have been selected which are adaptable to Long Island climatic conditions and to the existing soil materials . In addition, the seed mixtures which are proposed have been chosen because of their ability to provide adequate vegetative cover for the desired life expectancy of each development phase . PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS AND RATIONALE The types of soil material and length of exposure will vary through each of the different phases of construction, and the final phase . Several different seed mixtures were selected with input from the USDA Soil Conservation Service to 1 stabilize the exposed slopes during the different site development conditions and level of service expected on AE property. The following list includes both interim and permanent seed mixtures . The term "interim" is used loosely and refers to a seed mixture which is expected to provide relatively short-term vegetative coverage (two to four years) , during the site development for the soil materials . This is discussed in further detail later. 2 The following seed mixtures are labeled A, B, C, and D. These areas where mixtures are to be placed are shown on the Plan for Erosion Control (enclosed) . This plan is divided into three sections : 1) Site Grading Plan; 2) Erosion Control Plan; and 3 ) Erosion Control Final Phase . The Erosion Control Final Phase plan shows the areas (A, B, C, D) . The list below depicts the planting types . A. Beach area B. Bluff (no mowing) C. Swale (no mowing) D. Lawns PROPOSED SEED MIXTURES Application Rate Variety (lbs . /acre) A. Beach Area American Beachgrass 1 , 345 culms/1000 sq. ft . B. Bluff "Blackwell" Switchgrass 2 PLS "Atlantic" Coastal Panicgrass 2 PLS "Niagara" Big Bluestem 3 PLS "Aldous" or "Camper" Little Bluestem 2 PLS "Caucasian" Bluestem 2 PLS Sand Lovegrass 2 PLS "Goldstrike" Sand Bluestem 2 PLS "Empire" Birdsfoot Trefoil 2 PLS C. Swale Creeping Red Fescue 10 lb/ac "Lathco" Flatpea 25 lb/ac "Lancer" Perennial Pea 5 lb/ac "Arid" or "Apache" Tall Fescue 15 lb/ac Redtop 10 lb/ac D. Lawns Kentucky Bluegrass 20 lb/ac Creeping Red Fescue 20 lb/ac Perennial Ryegrass 5 lb/ac ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * PLS = Pure Live Seed where : 100 x lbs of 100 % PLS Seed Required = Actual lbs of commercial PLS of Commercial Seed Being Used seed to be used **Trefoil seeds must be inoculated at four times the manufacturer' s recommended rate when hydroseeding. 3 Although both the Bluff mix (B) and the Swale mix (C) are for permanent cover establishment, there are several differences between these two mixtures in terms of maintenance . Mixture P#1 contains warm season grasses which are typically associated with native prairies and are well adapted to droughty, low fertility, sandy sites . This mixture contains grasses that will germinate within 10 days given the proper moisture conditions (such as sand lovegrass) , while others are slower to develop and produce primarily root growth during the first year. If newly established plants do not appear vigorous after the first growing season, 300 lbs of 15-10-10 fertilizer will be applied in June, one year after seeding. After two years, the vegetative growth should be fully established and will require little to no future maintenance . Spring seeding dates are recommended for best establishment of this P#1 mixture, for the period between March 15th through May 15th. This mixture was recommended by the USDA Soil Conservation Service for soil stabilization on abandoned sand and gravel pits . The swale mix (C) contains cool season grasses which are typically associated with lawn or turf areas; and also contains a nitrogen- fixing legume (Perennial Pea and Flatpea) . The grasses will show up within the first growing season, however, the peas will be slow to establish and may appear by the second or third year. Since this is a more typical turf-type mixture, it will require annual fall (topdressing) applications of 200 lbs/acre of 10-10-10 fertilizer for the first 2 to 3 years . This mixture is slightly less tolerant 4 • of low fertilizer and maintenance conditions than (B) and may also require supplemental irrigation during droughty spells for successful establishment . Fall seeding dates are recommended for best establishment of this P#2 mixture, for the period between August 15th through September 30th. Summer seedings (between May 16th through August 14th) and winter seedings (between October let through March 14th) are not recommended. A temporary erosion control measure is proposed during these periods . This includes the application of two (2) tons per acre of shredded straw mulch followed by a chemical spray tackifier, such as Terra Tack II, or equivalent . As with the above grass mixtures, shrubs and woody plant material chosen for AE must be extremely hardy, shallow rooted and able to withstand drought conditions . The following is a list of trees and shrubs which may be incorporated into future detailed landscaped plans for the final development of AE. The majority of these plants have been identified as volunteer species or landscape plants which are growing successfully on Long Island. All species are adaptable to the growing conditions expected at the this site, and several are indigenous to the area. These woody plants will be utilized to provide wildlife habitat, to visually "break-up" the side slopes, and otherwise improve the aesthetics by adding seasonal color. Shrubs may be planted on small berms and in areas where the depth of the rooting medium is four (4) feet or greater. Trees will be utilized primarily at the edges of the road/beach to 5 provide a natural buffer/screening effect . Proposed Shurbs and Trees Shrubs Trees Autumn Olive E. Red Cedar Staghorn and Fragrant Sumac Shadbush Rugosa Rose Black Locust Northern Bayberry Norway Spruce Bristly Locust Limber Pine Virginia Creeper White Pine SITE DEVELOPMENT AND PLANTING SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION PHASE : The NORTHERN/OUTER FACE and the SOUTHERN FACE will be hydroseeded with seed mixture (mentioned above) , and the inner face areas will be hydroseeded with permanent seed mixture, (B) , if construction is completed during the normal growing season (between March 15th through May 15th and August 15th through September 30th) . However, if construction is completed during the summer (May 16th through August 14th) or winter (October 1st through March 14th) seasons, these areas will be temporarily mulched to control soil erosion until the next consecutive growing season. The temporary mulch cover will then be raked off or otherwise stripped immediately prior to hydroseeding. The hydroseeder slurry will contain the appropriate seed mixture, adequate lime (to attain a pH between 5 . 5 to 6 . 0) , fertilizer (600 lbs/acre of 5-10-10) and green-dyed wood fiber cellulose (500 lbs/acre) . Immediately 6 • after hydroseeding, all treated surfaces will be tracked with a bulldozer to ensure adequate seed/soil contact for germination. Finally, the treated areas will be hydromulched with wood fiber cellulose at 3000 lbs/acre . The entire NORTHERN FACE and the majority of the SOUTHERN FACE will remain essentially undisturbed throughout the sequential construction of the development . These areas are therefor proposed to be permanently seeded. Grassy vegetation and low ground cover growing on the side slopes will not affect the integrity of the existing ground cover and ground conditions . The soil material existing over the subject area consists primarily of sands with little or no organic matter. Unless it is suitably stabilized, erosion of the protective soil cover material on the inner face is expected to be severe . Hydroseeding with permanent seed mixture P#1 is proposed to stabilize this slope and SOUTHERN area. A permanent mixture was chosen rather than an interim mixture, because it is anticipated that the term of extended coverage will range from three (3) to approximately twenty (20) years . The establishment of a vegetative cover is expected to sustain or improve the specified permeability rate for the protective soil cover material . This is based on experiments performed by the U. S . Geological Survey (U. S .G.S . Water Resources Investigations Report 85-4323 , 1987) in which infiltration 7 rates were measured on seven (7) recharge basins in Nassau County. Three (3) of these basins were permitted to grow natural vegetation throughout the testing period. All three basins reportedly sustained high infiltration rates . Although the experiment did not directly assess the effects of vegetation, the report states that the root systems created a network of flow channels which was the probable cause of the high inflow rates . The permanent seed mixture, P#1, was selected for its ability to withstand the droughty soil conditions expected on the Southern innerface areas . This seed mixture contains grasses that will germinate quickly (within 10 days given the proper moisture conditions) and others which are slower to develop to provide longer term coverage. Birdsfoot trefoil, a nitrogen- fixing legume, was added to boost fertility and perpetuate the stand of the proposed seed mixture. FINAL PHASE During the final site development, a minimum 6-inch thick growing medium of specified topsoil or a 1 : 1 mixture of graded sand/composted leaf mulch will be placed. The newly placed top soil surface area will then be hydroseeded during the growing season with the above mentioned seed mixtures (page 3) . In addition, woody plant materials may be established on small planting berms and will be created to beautify the area. 8 Maintenance will be limited to topdressing with fertilizer (the first year after seeding for seed mixture (B) , or for the first two to three years after seeding for seed mixture (C) , immediate repair of any areas damaged by erosion or other disturbance and replacement of dead plant stock. No- other maintenance activities are expected. 9 LANDSCAPE PLAN INTRODUCTION This landscape plan has been developed for Aliperti Estates (AE) . The purpose of this landscape plan is to provide a vegetative cover over the existing soil materials existing for the AE area in order to reduce erosion, stabilize the side slopes and otherwise protect the existing soil materials . The landscape plan has been developed in two phases . The two (2) phases of development scheduled for AE are considered, namely, the construction phase and the final phase. Every effort is made so that the landscaping of AE will be consistent with and complimentary to plantings around the subject property. All plant materials have been selected which are adaptable to Long Island climatic conditions and to the existing soil materials . In addition, the seed mixtures which are proposed have been chosen because of their ability to provide adequate vegetative cover for the desired life expectancy of each development phase . PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS AND RATIONALE The types of soil material and length of exposure will vary through each of the different phases of construction, and the final phase . Several different seed mixtures were selected with input from the USDA Soil Conservation Service to 1 1W 71996 stabilize the exposed slopes during the different site development conditions and level of service expected on AE property. The following list includes both interim and permanent seed mixtures . The term "interim" is used loosely and refers to a seed mixture which is expected to provide relatively short-term vegetative coverage (two to four years) , during the site development for the soil materials . This is discussed in further detail later. 2 The following seed mixtures are labeled A, B, C, and D. These areas where mixtures are to be placed are shown on the Plan for Erosion Control (enclosed) . This plan is divided into three sections : 1) Site Grading Plan; 2) Erosion Control Plan; and 3) Erosion Control Final Phase . The Erosion Control Final Phase plan shows the areas (A, B, C, D) . The list below depicts the planting types . A. Beach area B . Bluff (no mowing) C. Swale (no mowing) D. Lawns PROPOSED SEED MIXTURES Application Rate Variety (lbs . /acre) A. Beach Area American Beachgrass 1 , 345 culms/1000 sq. ft . B. Bluff "Blackwell" Switchgrass 2 PLS "Atlantic" Coastal Panicgrass 2 PLS "Niagara" Big Bluestem 3 PLS "Aldous" or "Camper" Little Bluestem 2 PLS "Caucasian" Bluestem 2 PLS Sand Lovegrass 2 PLS "Goldstrike" Sand Bluestem 2 PLS "Empire" Birdsfoot Trefoil 2 PLS C. Swale Creeping Red Fescue 10 lb/ac "Lathco" Flatpea 25 lb/ac "Lancer" Perennial Pea 5 lb/ac "Arid" or "Apache" Tall Fescue 15 lb/ac Redtop 10 lb/ac D. Lawns Kentucky Bluegrass 20 lb/ac Creeping Red Fescue 20 lb/ac Perennial Ryegrass 5 lb/ac ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * PLS = Pure Live Seed where : 100 x lbs of 100 % PLS Seed Required = Actual lbs of commercial PLS of Commercial Seed Being Used seed to be used **Trefoil seeds must be inoculated at four times the manufacturer' s recommended rate when hydroseeding. 3 Although both the Bluff mix (B) and the Swale mix (C) are for permanent cover establishment, there are several differences between these two mixtures in terms of maintenance . Mixture P#1 contains warm season grasses which are typically associated with native prairies and are well adapted to droughty, low fertility, sandy sites . This mixture contains grasses that will germinate within 10 days given the proper moisture conditions (such as sand lovegrass) , while others are slower to develop and produce primarily root growth during the first year. If newly established plants do not appear vigorous after the first growing season, 300 lbs of 15-10-10 fertilizer will be applied in June, one year after seeding. After two years, the vegetative growth should be fully established and will require little to no future maintenance. Spring seeding dates are recommended for best establishment of this P#1 mixture, for the period between March 15th through May 15th. This mixture was recommended by the USDA Soil Conservation Service for soil stabilization on abandoned sand and gravel pits . The swale mix (C) contains cool season grasses which are typically associated with lawn or turf areas; and also contains a nitrogen- fixing legume (Perennial Pea and Flatpea) . The grasses will show up within the first growing season, however, the peas will be slow to establish and may appear by the second or third year. Since this is a more typical turf-type mixture, it will require annual fall (topdressing) applications of 200 lbs/acre of 10-10-10 fertilizer for the first 2 to 3 years . This mixture is slightly less tolerant 4 of low fertilizer and maintenance conditions than (B) and may also require supplemental irrigation during droughty spells for successful establishment . Fall seeding dates are recommended for best establishment of this P#2 mixture, for the period between August 15th through September 30th. Summer seedings (between May 16th through August 14th) and winter seedings (between October 1st through March 14th) are not recommended. A temporary erosion control measure is proposed during these periods . This includes the application of two (2) tons per acre of shredded straw mulch followed by a chemical spray tackifier, such as Terra Tack II, or equivalent . As with the above grass mixtures, shrubs and woody plant material chosen for AE must be extremely hardy, shallow rooted and able to withstand drought conditions . The following is a list of trees and shrubs which may be incorporated into future detailed landscaped plans for the final development of AE. The majority of these plants have been identified as volunteer species or landscape plants which are growing successfully on Long Island. All species are adaptable to the growing conditions expected at the this site, and several are indigenous to the area. These woody plants will be utilized to provide wildlife habitat, to visually "break-up" the side slopes, and otherwise improve the aesthetics by adding seasonal color. Shrubs may be planted on small berms and in areas where the depth of the rooting medium is four (4) feet or greater. Trees will be utilized primarily at the edges of the road/beach to 5 provide a natural buffer/screening effect . Proposed Shurbs and Trees Shrubs Trees Autumn Olive E . Red Cedar Staghorn and Fragrant Sumac Shadbush Rugosa Rose Black Locust Northern Bayberry Norway Spruce Bristly Locust Limber Pine Virginia Creeper White Pine SITE DEVELOPMENT AND PLANTING SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION PHASE: The NORTHERN/OUTER FACE and the SOUTHERN FACE will be hydroseeded with seed mixture (mentioned above) , and the inner face areas will be hydroseeded with permanent seed mixture, (B) , if construction is completed during the normal growing season (between March 15th through May 15th and August 15th through September 30th) . However, if construction is completed during the summer (May 16th through August 14th) or winter (October 1st through March 14th) seasons, these areas will be temporarily mulched to control soil erosion until the next consecutive growing season. The temporary mulch cover will then be raked off or otherwise stripped immediately prior to hydroseeding. The hydroseeder slurry will contain the appropriate seed mixture, adequate lime (to attain a pH between 5 . 5 to 6 . 0) , fertilizer (600 lbs/acre of 5-10-10) and green-dyed wood fiber cellulose (500 lbs/acre) . Immediately 6 after hydroseeding, all treated surfaces will be tracked with a bulldozer to ensure adequate seed/soil contact for germination. Finally, the treated areas will be hydromulched with wood fiber cellulose at 3000 lbs/acre . The entire NORTHERN FACE and the majority of the SOUTHERN FACE will remain essentially undisturbed throughout the sequential construction of the development . These areas are therefor proposed to be permanently seeded. Grassy vegetation and low ground cover growing on the side slopes will not affect the integrity of the existing ground cover and ground conditions . The soil material existing over the subject area consists primarily of sands with little or no organic matter. Unless it is suitably stabilized, erosion of the protective soil cover material on the inner face is expected to be severe. Hydroseeding with permanent seed mixture P#1 is proposed to stabilize this slope and SOUTHERN area. A permanent mixture was chosen rather than an interim mixture, because it is anticipated that the term of extended coverage will range from three (3) to approximately twenty (20) years . The establishment of a vegetative cover is expected to sustain or improve the specified permeability rate for the protective soil cover material . This is based on experiments performed by the U.S . Geological Survey (U.S .G.S . Water Resources Investigations Report 85-4323 , 1987) in which infiltration 7 rates were measured on seven (7) recharge basins in Nassau County. Three (3) of these basins were permitted to grow natural vegetation throughout the testing period. All three basins reportedly sustained high infiltration rates . Although the experiment did not directly assess the effects of vegetation, the report states that the root systems created a network of flow channels which was the probable cause of the high inflow rates . The permanent seed mixture, P#1, was selected for its ability to withstand the droughty soil conditions expected on the Southern innerface areas . This seed mixture contains grasses that will germinate quickly (within 10 days given the proper moisture conditions) and others which are slower to develop to provide longer term coverage . Birdsfoot trefoil, a nitrogen- fixing legume, was added to boost fertility and perpetuate the stand of the proposed seed mixture . FINAL PHASE During the final site development, a minimum 6-inch thick growing medium of specified topsoil or a 1 : 1 mixture of graded sand/composted leaf mulch will be placed. The newly placed top soil surface area will then be hydroseeded during the growing season with the above mentioned seed mixtures (page 3) . In addition, woody plant materials may be established on small planting berms and will be created to beautify the area. 8 Maintenance will be limited to topdressing with fertilizer (the first year after seeding for seed mixture (B) , or for the first two to three years after seeding for seed mixture (C) , immediate repair of any areas damaged by erosion or other disturbance and replacement of dead plant stock. No- other maintenance activities are expected. 9 ALIPERTI ESTATES DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR ALIPERTI ESTATES Drainage for the ALIPERTI Estates has been considered as required by the regulatory and local agencies. Consideration for the undeveloped areas next to the ALIPERTI Estates was also taken into account. Watershed area encompassing the existing ALIPERTI Estates was obtained from the regulatory authorities. Drainage on ALIPERTI Estates is analyzed in a Two phase approach. The two phases being; 1: Drainage during the construction Phase, and 2, Final Phase (after development of the property). AVAILABLE INFORMATION ON ALIPERTI ESTATES: Total Drainage Area = This is the total drainage area encompassing the ALIPERTI Estates which will be contributing rainfall on to ALIPERTI Estates. = 19.02 Acres Effective Drainage Area = This is considered as the area of the ALIPERTI Estates where the soil cover and effective drainage can be controlled by proper design and construction methods. 9.23 Acres Design Rainfall = 5 inch rainfall over 24 hour period. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATION DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF ALIPERTI ESTATES During the construction phase,the contractor shall perform the grading of the entire site of the ALIPERTI Estates as proposed in the enclosed plans. The contractor shall implement all necessary erosion control measures such as the installation of temporary hay bales, silt fences and temporary drainage structures if needed. Erosion control devices shall be maintained in operation until the final erosion control plan is implemented for the ALIPERTI Estates. The following are the calculations for the drainage during the construction phase: During the construction phase, since the contractor's operation will be limited on ALIPERTI Estates and not on the properties adjacent to ALIPERTI Estates, drainage calculations are performed keeping this criteria. It is known that the neighboring properties adjacent to ALIPERTI Estates is undeveloped. Therefore, the permeability of i' MAY 7 !yy6 e the existing soil materials is considered as moderately permeable soil materials. Permeability of moderate sandy soils with no ground cover is considered moderate with rates ranging between 0.2 - 0.6 "/hr( Reference #1). Use 0.3 "/hr as a reasonable estimate. Area 1 = Drainage Area west of ALIPERTI Estates (See Figure #1 and#2) Area 3 = Drainage Area of ALIPERTI Estates (See Figure #1 and#2) Area 2 = Drainage Area east of ALIPERTI Estates (See Figure #1 and#2) Watershed area= Area 1 + Area 2 +Area 3 Total drainage Area = 19.02 Acres Total drainage area of the neighboring properties Area 1 +Area 2 A" = 9.79 acres Total Discharge from neighboring properties= Q = CIA C= Using C=1 for the worst case scenario, assuming the properties will be undeveloped for a long time. I = intensity of the rain, 5" rainfall over a 24 hour duration. A= Area in Acres CALCULATIONS USING ENGINEERING APPROACH Rainfall rate on neighboring property _(5"/24 hours) * Total area A" = 2.04 inches/hour/acre Permeability of undeveloped properties adjacent to ALIPERTI properties, considering the soil to moderately permeable sandy material with no established ground cover, Using permeability of sandy material as 0.3"/hr. _(0.3") * Total area A" =2.93"/Acre i.e. 2.93"/Acre>2.04"/Acre which infers as Permeability of existing sandy material>Rate of rainfall on neighboring properties. 2 CALCULATIONS USING RATIONAL METHOD For worst case scenario, use C = 1. Q = 1*5*9.79 cfs 48.95 cfs Permeability of undeveloped properties adjacent to ALIPERTI properties I=permeability = 0.3"/hour= 7.2" over a 24 hour duration Total permeability of undeveloped ground cover of neighboring properties adjacent properties Using C=.S for a worst case scenario Q =CIA =0.5*7.2"*9.79 Acres =35.24 cfs Therefore the permeability of the ground cover of the neighboring properties is greater than that the rainfall occurring on the property. Hence O.K. As used in normal good engineering construction methods, the Contractor shall utilize all preventive methods to control effects of wind blowing the soil material from the neighboring properties onto ALIPERTI Estates. The contractor shall install silt fences to control the soil material drifts. The Contractor shall also utilize other preventive measures such as hay bales with proper anchoring methods to control any runoff as a result of change in soil condition. DRAINAGE ON ALIPERTI ESTATES During the construction phase, since the contractor will be regrading the entire site, there will be no established ground cover. Moderately permeable sandy material will be exposed during this phase of construction activity. Permeability of sandy material is greater than the rate of the of rainfall intensity. Total Drainage Area of ALIPERTI Estates 9.23 Acres 3 CALCULATIONS USING RATIONAL METHOD Using C = 1 for worst case scenario Q = 1*5*9.23 cfs 46.15 cfs Permeability of undeveloped ALIPERTI Estates properties I= Permeability = 0.3"/hour= 7.2" over a 24 hour duration Total permeability of undeveloped ground cover of ALIPERTI Estates properties Using C=.S for a worst case scenario Q =CIA =0.5*7.2"*9.23 Acres = 33.23 cfs Which indicates that the permeability of soil material during the construction phase is greater that the rate of rainfall occurring over ALIPERTI Estates Properties. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATION DURING THE FINAL PHASE OF ALIPERTI ESTATES During the final phase after all the construction is completed and an erosion control plan has been established the contractor shall implement all necessary erosion control measures such as hay bales and silt fences as shown the plans until the neighboring properties have been developed. Erosion control devices shall be maintained in operation until the final erosion control plan is fully established. The following are the calculation for the drainage during the final phase: During the final phase, since ALIPERTI Estates will be developed and the adjacent properties to ALIPERTI Estates will be undeveloped for unknown specified time, the drainage calculation are performed keeping this criteria established. Therefore, the permeability of the existing soil materials is considered as moderately permeable soil materials for adjacent properties with Permeability of sandy material with no ground cover is documented with rates greater than 0.3"/hr( Reference#1). ALIPERTI Estates will be developed in accordance with the described. The coefficient for runoff'C' will be treated as 0.5, i.e. with effective ground cover well established. Area 1 = Drainage Area west of ALIPERTI Estates (See Figure #1 and#2) Area 2 = Drainage Area of ALIPERTI Estates (See Figure#1 and #2) Area 3 = Drainage Area east of ALIPERTI Estates (See Figure #1 and #2) Watershed area AA=Area 1 +Area 2 +Area 3 4 Total drainage of the watershed area AA = 1*5"*2.05 +0.5*5"*9.23 + 1*5"*7.74 = 72 cfs Permeability of Watershed area 1*7.2*2.05 F 0.5*7.2*9.23 + 1*7.2*7.74 103.72 cfs Hence 103.72>72 The permeability of the drainage area even after the final construction phase is fully developed is greater than the rainfall intensity rate with the existing soil ground cover materials on adjacent properties next to ALIPERTI estates. However, the erosion control devices shall be maintained in accordance with the plan as described since the calculations do not address the wind blowing and soil material drifting. 5 REFERENCE: 1. A Guide for interpreting Engineering uses of Soils. U.S. Department of Agriculture 2 A Guide to Conservation Plantings on Critical Erosion Areas by U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 3. Soil Survey of Suffolk County,NY. United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service in Cooperation with Cornell Agriculture Experiment Station 6 REFERENCE # 1 Columns 12 and 13.—Liquid limit (column 12) and Plasticity index (col— 13) . If knowledge is such that liquid limit and plasticity index can be estimated, enter the estimates in the respective columns. Express estimates as ranges of values; enter "NP" for soils that are nonplastic. !Sake entries in these columns only if laboratory-determined liquid limit and plasticity index are available for enough soils so that entries are reliable estimates. The laboratory data do not have to be for soils in the survey area, but, if not, they must be for soils like those in the survey area. Omit these columns if reliable estimates can- not be made for most soils in the survey area. Column 14.--Permeability. Soil permeability is that quality of soil that enables it to transmit water and air. Accepted as a measure of this quality is the rate at which soil transmits water while saturated. That rate is the "saturated hydraulic conductivity" of soil physics. In line with conventional usage in the engineering profession and tra- ditional usage in the published soil surveys, this rate of flow, prin- cipally downward, continues to be expressed as "permeability. " The definition and basis for estimating permeability should be given in the Glossary in published soil surveys. Use a footnote to direct readers to the glossary. To rate soil permeability; use the numerical ranges shown below: Permeability class Numerical range (inches per hour) Very slow Leu than 0.06 Slow 0.06-0.2 I Moderately slow 0.2-0.6 Moderate 0.6-2.0 Moderately rapid 2.0-6.0 l Rapid _ 6.0-20 I Very rapid More than 20 Column 15.--Available water capacity. Express available water capacity in inches of water per inch of soil. Limit entries to values considered reliable. Use a range to indicate a span of capacity, e.g. , 0.15-0.17. Caution: Base estimates not only on soil texture, making appropriate adjustment for coarse fragments,but also on structure, consistence, and bulk density. Do not enter estimates of available water capacity for hardpans or other dense layers from which roots are excluded, and do not enter estimates for soil layers below them either. Instead, enter a reference to a footnote which explains that roots of most plants are excluded from these layers and water in them therefore is not available to plants. In some dense layers, as in many fragipans, root penetration is restric- ted and roots are not altogether excluded. Enter estimates for such PLANNING BOARD MEMBLS pfF04 � �r RICHARD G.WARD �o�� CQ 4T Town Hall, 53095 Main Road ChairmanP.O. Box 1179 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. G Southold, New York 11971 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. WFax (516) 765-3136 Z WILLIAM J. CREMERS O Telephone(516) 765-1935 KENNETH L. EDWARDS y t' 0 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD KV 2, 1996 B. Anthony Aliperti Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: In conducting a review of the overall Oregon Road area recently, I noticed that during a revision of the Aliperti Estates subdivision the east/west 50' right-of-way was moved to the south. The revised location of the right-of-way does not align with the proposed extension of Soundview Avenue. I have enclosed a copy of the applicable tax map and a copy of the proposed Cedar Bluff subdivision which shows the 50' r-o-w in the proper location. Please have your surveyor revise the location of the 50' r-o-w on the Aliperti Estates preliminary map. If you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Z' Melissa Sp r Planner enc. e 1� Q ,9 0 < �a. 4.1 0 lo. 1a c�0 5 ° O t° A. 2.9A(c) 1.5 FOR V 2 J SE113 ic, i 20 19- +• L3AW� 18 17 .5A(c) `•. 4. e' 4.2 16.2 •� P ry 26.OA 3.6A ."' COUNTY OF � OEVELOPMEN 14 y0 3.9A(c) ` ,o °• 3 13 10 ° S ru 2 �' 'u, $• l.WO .N ea v 37.3 A(c) 12. 4 'r 1.2 A(c) ni p r� 17.5 A(c) 12.2 2 3 u. LU1(c) 1.1 A(c) 2 : 1.0 A(c) • r � a $ 5 ,°'�• FOR PARCEL NO. 10 /F SANFORD HANAUER ASSOCIATES PENSION Ft- S. LS. 40' 09' 00" E. Z o 5.40'09D0'E m e as opo N. 40' 09' 00" W. LOT . 2 � ,h0�o9� a rA 7,5 \ 32 I.� p N b/cz enve/ooe r, LOT ` a ? S L w y J 1 ti M W � oI o N a !J 2 SUFFO k N40'09'007. ., 19100'".. O 2 a r' E; I —wr. O1`_N.40'09'00T. 168 b N O � _ M+ p '>.. 168-N*" (`lJj �1 J IOtoCI 3 P— W I `Q 0 O �TSK P O N qN � W 6 k U i0o I Y Z Z N ~ Ik L z be o � _I �r' _ j t �---� 0 0 !n V c o 75 -- LOT' 3 rz: j 5.39'2030 . n r 391.33' j to h z J )) 25.02' Fur sta-�o-.< 25' Right of Way N. 39120'3c, W. N. 39' 20' 30' W. 765.17' LIQ N/ O /F BARRY B. BERKMAN AND!bTHERS VACANT J N/ O /F SANFORD HANAUER ASSOCIA TES PEN-' Q PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS • SpFFO(,�co Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARD O (/y P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y Z Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Telephone(516) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS • O KENNETH L.EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 14, 1996 B. Anthony Aliperti Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board reviewed your request to separate the 20 acre lot (Lot #1 of the proposed 10 lot subdivision) from the remainder of the property prior to completing the proposed 10 lot subdivision, at this morning's work session. There are two different procedures that you can follow to create the 20 acre parcel. These are listed below. 1. The current subdivision can be presented as two sections; Section 1 consisting of the 20 acre parcel and Section 2 consisting of Lots 2 - 10. However, prior to sectionalizing the project, preliminary approval on the overall layout must be obtained. This requires the submission of an acceptable Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and the information outlined in the Board's February 7, 1995 letter. 2. You can apply for a two lot subdivision of the property. However, since the Planning Board can not process two applications for the same property, this will necessitate that the current subdivision be withdrawn. In addition, the Planning Board will require a covenant on the 20 acre parcel prohibiting any further subdivision in perpetuity. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Me lsf'-sa Planner :r Immo J"'` FEB 9 X96 SOuii+aL 1S :'� PLANNING BOARD MEMBEN! SpFF0J' �� C� Town Hall,53095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARD h�0 Gym P.O. Box 1179 Chainnan o= < Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. = Fax(516)765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ti WILLIAM J.CREMERS G • Telephone(516) 765-1935 KENNETH L.EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 30, 1996 B. Anthony Aliperti Box 149 Shirley, NY 11967 Re: Proposed major subdivision for Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 29, 1996: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from February 6, 1996 to August 6, 1996. Please note that this will be the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward ,mss Chairman January 21, 1996 B. Anthony Aliperti Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 Town of Southold Department of the Planning Board 53095 Main Street Southold, NY 11971 RE: Land Division, Oregon Road, Suffolk County Aliperti Estates at Mattituck SCTM # 1000-95-01-03 Dear Sir/Madam: The conditional sketch approval on the above subdivision was granted an extension from August 6, 1995 and is due to expire on February 6, 1996. I recently experienced a severe cardiac condition, October, 1995, which prohibited me to continue work that was already in progress in order to meet your requirements. It would be greatly appreciated if an additional six month extension be granted since I am currently in rehabilitation and am able to continue work. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at my home or office. (H) (516) 744-4828, (0) (516) 281-2646. Very tru o s, Anthony A ir �! JAN 2 3 0% I A&I rasa FFO( PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �Gy j o Richard G. Ward, Chairman w2 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. y �� �' Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald '�Ol �a +'� Pax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 8, 1995 B. Anthony Aliperti P.O. Box 149 Shirley, NY 11967 Re: Proposed major subdivision for Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 7, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from August 6, 1995 to February 6, 1996. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, 1,7 Richard G. Ward Chairman • 15-� �+s PP> August 1 , 1996 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 516-281 -2646 Town of Southold Planning Board Office 53095 Main Street PO BOX 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1 -3 Dear Mr. Chairman: The conditional sketch approval which was granted on February 6, 1995, is due to expire on August 6, 1995 on the above major subdivision. I am requesting a six month extension of the sketch approval. It would be greatly appreciated if the Town of Southold would grant the extension. If you have any question please call. Thank you and have a great day. Sincer , . Anthony 1ti D l� 5 EAUG 3 1995 SOUTNOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD o�SUFFOI/r PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. • Southold, New York 11971 •j• t. Mark S. McDonald '�'Oj �`a� Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 18, 1995 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 199 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Allperti: The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan dated June 7, 1995, which was prepared for the above mentioned subdivision, was reviewed by Allan Connell of the USDA Natural Resources'Conservation Service. Mr. Connell outlined, in a report dated July 12, '1995, items that should be revised or included in the plan. Enclosed is a copy of Mr. Connell's report. The Planning Board is requiring that you comply with the items outlined in the report. The revised Erosion and Sediment Control Plan must be submitted as part of the preliminary submission. In addition, the conditional sketch approval which was granted on February 6, 1995, is due to expire on August 6, 1995. You must submit a written request for an extension of sketch approval prior to the expiration date. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Melissa( �Gird Planner !/ enc. August 1 , 1996 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 516-281 -2646 Town of Southold Planning Board Office 53095 Main Street PO BOX 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTMB 1000-95-1 -3 Oear Mr. Chairman: The conditional sketch approval which was granted on February 6, 1995 , is due to expire on August 6, 1995 on the above major subdivision. I am requesting a six month extension of the sketch approval . It would be greatly appreciated if the Town of Southold would grant the extension. If you have any question Please call . Thank you and have a great day. Sincer , . Anthony 1 ti E I %5 r.dv 8wG'BOARD PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS =��UFO rya Richard G. Ward, Chairman y x Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. V+ T a P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. y� a��r Sould, New 765 3136971 Mark S. McDonald '111 �0 . Fax Kenneth L. Edwards ,y Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 18, 1995 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan dated June 7, 1995, which was prepared for the above mentioned subdivision, was reviewed by Allan Connell of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Mr. Connell outlined, in a report dated July 12, 1995, items that should be revised or included in the plan. Enclosed is a copy of Mr. Connell's report. The Planning Board is requiring that you comply with the items outlined in the report. The revised Erosion and Sediment Control Plan must be submitted as part of the preliminary submission. In addition, the conditional sketch approval which was granted on February 6, 1995, is due to expire on August 6, 1995. You must submit a written request for an extension of sketch approval prior to the expiration date. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, zlGG 6( - lissa p!ro � Planner enc. ve M5 United States Natural Resources Riverhead County Center Department of Conservation Room E-16 Agriculture Service Riverhead , New York 11901 July 12, 1995 Ms . Melissa Spiro Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O . Box 1179 Southold , New York 11971 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision AI iperti Estates 'I dI 4 it Erosion and Sediment Control Plan lila 30U—HOLD TOWN Dear Me I i ssa: # "_,aP;;lINGBOARD I have reviewed the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the Aliperti Estates and would like to make the following comments and suggestions regarding this plan : First, the watershed limits for the proposed natural drainage area extend well beyond the property boundaries of the subdivision and must be included to determine the size of the recharge basin . I have included a five foot contour map depicting this watershed for your review. The map scale of the Erosion Control plan does not accurately reflect the distances shown on the plan . This should be verified and proper adjustments made to more accurately show the required setbacks , building envelopes and location of proposed structures needed to control erosion and sedimentation . Details for the proposed plan are lacking . Although the applicant provides a list of suitable plants to be used for stabilization purposes , specific standards and specifications must be developed so that the practices are installed properly . Things to include in the planting plan are : site preparation , time of planting , spacing of plants , amounts of seed , fertilization requirements and water needs . Standards and specifications should be developed for each practice proposed in the plan . The New York Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control , Empire State Chapter, Soil and Water Conservation Society , Syracuse , New York is an excellent reference for developing these standards . I have included information on how to order this publication if the applicant or the town is interested . A reference copy is also available through our office . As a minimum the erosion and sediment control plan should include : 1 . A description of the temporary and permanent structural and vegetative measures that will be used to control erosion and sedimentation including standards and specifications for each practice . 2. A plan map to scale showing the location of erosion and sediment control measures both vegetative and structural . This step has begun with the location of the natural drainage area on the plan submitted . 3. Dimensional details of the natural drainage area and any other temporary or permanent structural measures to be used. 4 . An implementation schedule for each measure to be installed . 5. A maintenance schedule for the natural drainage area and a description of maintenance activities to be performed . Other considerations : 1 . Erosion and sedimentation control measures should be constructed prior to beginning any other land disturbance activities . The devices should not be removed until the disturbed land is stabilized . Examples of these devices include temporary swales , straw bale dikes , silt fence and sediment traps . 2. Grading should blend with adjoining properties . 3. Timing : a . The natural drainage area side slopes should be seeded and stabilized with erosion control materials such as straw mulch , jute mesh , or excelsior wood fiber mats within 15 days of final grading . b . Permanent seeding should optimally be undertaken in the spring from April 1st through May 30th , and in late summer and early fall from August 15th through October 15th . When seeding is found to be impracticable , an appropriate mulch should be applied . I have included a copy of an erosion and sediment control review checklist indicating items that should be revised or included in the plan . If you have questions or I can be of further assistance with this project feel free to contact me . Sincerely , a�CG J&4 Allan S . Connell District Conservationist EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST LZ END FOR REVIEW 1IECX1 M A = ALTERNATIVES SUGGESTED A = ADEQUATE INC =INCOMPLETE B = REQUESTED, NOT SUBMITTED NA = NOT APPLICABL PLC = NOT CHECKED PROJECT NAME: AL/PERT / ESTRTBS SITE LOCATION: OREC7&V R1) Mf17"TiTuClC /Vy APPLICANT'S NAME&ADDRESS: THE DISTRICT HAS REVIEWED THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL AND SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING ITEMS BE REVISED TO PROVIDE THE PROPER SOIL EROSION,SEDIMENT,AND STORMWATER CONTROLS CONSISTENT WITH THE SUBJECT TOPOGRAPHY. TECHNICAL REVIEW SUPPLIED BY THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE PLANS- GENERAL A I-Scope of plan clearly delineated and noted in title block A2. Vicinity map with scale and north arrow. A 3. Legend,scales,north arrow for plan view. A 4. Existing and proposed topography shown,contours labeled and spot elevations at critical areas. 5.Typical designs on plan review drawings shown for necessary diversion berms,interceptor drains and outlets, level spreaders,storm drain inlet protectors,grassed waterways,etc. 'VA 6.Limit of 100 year floodplain delineated on plan. NA 7.Existing and proposed improvements and utilities. !A.C S.The total disturbed area delineated on site plan: NA a.Indicate the total acreage to be paved,roofed,sodded,seeded,etc. /AI G b.Delineate all areas to be stabilized vegetatively by seeding,sodding,or ground covers. -N G c.Greenbelt areas are clearly delineated. f,_9.Standard General Notes. I&C._10. Scale. NoT A:aak,4T-E. IA:C-11.Sequence of operations. IN 12.Stock pile area designated or referenced. IVA 13.Property boundaries indicated,and easements as needed. NA 14.Street profiles. )V4 15.Composite drainage area map for plans requiring more than one sheet,with sediment control measures shown in their approximate locations. October 1991 -Third Printing Page F.1 New York Guidelines for Urban Section 11 Erosion and Sediment Control SOLI S INFORMAIMN • _/L16.Detailed soils Map attached or overlaid on plan map with interpretations. -AM_17.Deep soil pit logs attached and exact location shown on plan map for all proposed dry and diffusion wells, and septic systems. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST-Page 2 SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AIA 18.Permanent Dikes(perimeter,diversion,interceptor) _a.Practice meets purpose and design criteria. _b.Positive drainage is maintained,and contributing drainage area shown _c.Outlet to sediment trapping device or onto stable outlet _d.Points of vehicular crossings shown and stabilized(mountable berm). _e.Standard detail and construction specifications AIA-19.Temporary Swales(interceptor,perimeter). _a.Practice meets purpose and design criteria. _b.Contributing drainage area shown. _c.Channel grade exceeding_%,slope properly stabilized. _d.Adequate outlet or discharge condition. _e.Provisions for traffic crossing shown on plan. _f Standard detail and construction specifications L G 20.Traps(Rip-rap,earth, pipe,and storm inlet). A.Practice meets purpose and design criteria _b.Contributing drainage area delineated on plan. c.Trap sized by largest drainage area(existing or developed) to trap. _d.Type and size of outlet structure. _e.Outlet conditions. _f.Plan view of trap and storage area(drawn to scale with bottom dimensioned .Volume calculations. _h.Bottom,crest and clean-out(at 50%trap efficiency)elevations. _i.Standard detail and construction specifications LC 21.Straw Bale Dike and Silt Fence _,a.Meets purpose and design criteria _b.Controlled slope less than 100 feet _c.Drainage area less than 1 acre per 100 feet of dike or fence. (for sheet erosion only) _d.Standard detail and construction specifications /VA 22.Grade Stabilization Structure(flume,pipe,slope drain,ctc.) _a.Meets purpose and design criteria _b.Pipe drain size noted _c. Contributing drainage area shown _d.Standard detail and construction specifications X23.Permanent Structural Practices or Sediment Control Measures Exceeding the Design Criteria of the Standard detail. _a.Practice meets purpose and design _b.Drainage area map _c.Runoff calculations _d. Calculations for size,velocity,and O e.Standard detail with dimensions and construction specifications JAIC_24.Provisions for protecting cut and fill slopes from surface runoff New York Guidelines for Urban Page F.2 Erosion and Sediment Control October 1991 -Third Printing Section 11 LA(Cls. Sita 'grading _a.Maximum Ad slope of 2 foot horiz. to 1 foot vert. Si _b.Slopes requiring regular maintenance will be no steeper than 3 foot deep. c.Details of cut and fill slopes shown EROSION _*�_•,;D SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST- Page 3 [AJ(Z,2ti.See=ding Specification and Notes _a.Seedbed Preparation _b.Permanent seeding(mix and rale) -includes method of application. _c.Temporary seeding(mix and rates) - includes method of application _d.Mulching(includes anchoring method) _e.Sod(type and installation) _f. Fertilizer(amount and type) g.Lime (amount and type) _h.Seeding dates(temporary and Permanent-to cover entire year). IA4C 27.Sterni inlets adequately protected(detail required) Aq 28.StaTlized construction entrances shown on plan (detail required) /A)C-29. Previsions for sediment and erosion control of areas disturbed for storm drain and utility construction. INC.30.Storm Drainage _a. Drainage area map and computations _b. Plan and profile indicating pipe size,type,slope,O,structures,and inlet(type), top and invert elevations _c.Proposed outlet protection dimensions and computations. _d.Constructed outfall ditch or Swale cross-section and flow computations for depth and velocity _e.Profile of outfall sufficient to show natural gradient of accepting channel or conduit. _f.Outlet protection of 0%a slope for minimum required distance WA31. Riprap and Gabions _a.Median stone size and minimum depth of treated section shown on plan. _b.Riprap placed upon approved filter cloth _c.Cross-section detail of treated areas NA 32.Permit notification from other agencies J1�f# 33.Storm Water Management referred to: Date: Town of_ 3n_i City of Village / A V x.34.Sediment Basin or Recharge Basin a.Seedbed preparation,seeding rate and method of application,and mulch details included. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Plans reviewed by ate Reviewed: October 1991 -Third Printing Page F.3 New York Guidelines for Urban Section 11 Erosion and Sediment Control • � P6 MS United States Natural Resources Riverhead County Center Department of Conservation Room E-16 Agriculture Service Riverhead , New York 11901 July 12, 1995 Ms . Melissa Spiro Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold , New York 11971 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision � AI iperti Estates Erosion and Sediment Control Plan 4Q% U � SOuTNOLD TOWN Dear Me I i ssa: o,_. PLANNING BOARD I have reviewed the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the Aliperti Estates and would like to make the following comments and suggestions regarding this plan : First, the watershed limits for the proposed natural drainage area extend well beyond the property boundaries of the subdivision and must be included to determine the size of the recharge basin . I have included a five foot contour map depicting this watershed for your review. The map scale of the Erosion Control plan does not accurately reflect the distances shown on the plan . This should be verified and proper adjustments made to more accurately show the required setbacks , building envelopes and location of proposed structures needed to control erosion and sedimentation . Details for the proposed plan are lacking . Although the applicant provides a list of suitable plants to be used for stabilization purposes , specific standards and specifications must be developed so that the practices are installed properly . Things to include in the planting plan are : site preparation , time of planting , spacing of plants , amounts of seed , fertilization requirements and water needs . Standards and specifications should be developed for each practice proposed in the plan . The New York Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control , Empire State Chapter, Soil and Water Conservation Society , Syracuse, New York is an excellent reference for developing these standards . I have included information on how to order this publication if the applicant or the town is interested . A reference copy is also available through our office . As a minimum the erosion and sediment control plan should include : 1 . A description of the temporary and permanent structural and vegetative measures that will be used to control erosion and sedimentation including standards and specifications for each practice . 2. A plan map to scale showing the location of erosion and sediment control measures both vegetative and structural . This step has begun with the location of the natural drainage area on the plan submitted . 3. Dimensional details of the natural drainage area and any other temporary or permanent structural measures to be used . 4. An implementation schedule for each measure to be installed . 5. A maintenance schedule for the natural drainage area and a description of maintenance activities to be performed . Other considerations : 1 . Erosion and sedimentation control measures should be constructed prior to beginning any other land disturbance activities . The devices should not be removed until the disturbed land is stabilized . Examples of these devices include temporary swales , straw bale dikes , silt fence and sediment traps . 2. Grading should blend with adjoining properties . 3. Timing : a. The natural drainage area side slopes should be seeded and stabilized with erosion control materials such as straw mulch , jute mesh , or excelsior wood fiber mats within 15 days of final grading . b . Permanent seeding should optimally be undertaken in the spring from April 1st through May 30th , and in late summer and early fall from August 15th through October 15th . When seeding is found to be impracticable , an appropriate mulch should be applied . I have included a copy of an erosion and sediment control review checklist indicating items that should be revised or included in the plan . If you have questions or I can be of further assistance with this project feel free to contact me . Sincerely , Allan S. Connell District Conservationist EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST i. rmisin F[1R REVIEW CHECKLIST AS = ALTERNATIVES SUGGESTED A = ADEQUATE MC =INCOMPLETE B = REQUESTED,NOT SUBMITTED NA = NOT APPLICABL NC = NOT CHECKED PROJECT NAME: AL IPF—R7-1 Esr4T S SITE LOCATION: OREGGW �D M�TTirucK APPLICANT'S NAME&ADDRESS: THE DISTRICT HAS REVIEWED THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL AND SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING ITEMS BE REVISED TO PROVIDE THE PROPER SOIL EROSION,SEDIMENT,AND STORMWATER CONTROLS CONSISTENT WITH THE SUBJECT TOPOGRAPHY. TECHNICAL REVIEW SUPPLIED BY THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE PLANS-GENERAL A ].Scope of plan clearly delineated and noted in title block A 2.Vicinity map with scale and north arrow. A-3.Legend,scales,north arrow for plan view. _A4.Existing and proposed topography shown,contours labeled and spot elevations at critical areas. /NC 5.Typical designs on plan review drawings shown for necessary diversion berms,interceptor drains and outlets,level spreaders,storm drain inlet protectors,grassed waterways,etc. NA 6.Limit of 100 year floodplain delineated on plan. N_7.Existing and proposed improvements and utilities. /NG &The total disturbed area delineated on site plan: NA a.Indicate the total acreage to be paved,roofed,sodded,seeded,etc. 1AI G b.Delineate all areas to be stabilized vegetatively by seeding,sodding,or ground covers. -J—�c.Greenbelt areas are clearly delineated. -AL4__9.Standard General Notes. (&,10. Scale. NoT- ACGuR.4T'F- 1/4G 11.Sequence of operations. //�G 12.Stock pile area designated or referenced. IV4 13.Property boundaries indicated,and easements as needed. NA 14.Street profdes. N4 Composite drainage area map for plans requiring more than one sheet,with sediment control measures shown in their approximate locations. October 1991 -Third Printing Page F.1 New York Guidelines for Urban Section t t Erosion and Sediment Control 0 --&16.Detailed soils Map attached or overlaid on plan map with interpretations. ,40_17.Deep soil pit logs attached and exact location shown on plan map for all proposed dry and diffusion wells, and septic systems. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST,Page 2 SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL A-18.Permanent Dikes(perimeter,diversion,interceptor) _a.Practice meets purpose and design criteria. _b.Positive drainage is maintained,and contributing drainage area shown _____c.Outlet to sediment trapping device or onto stable outlet _d.Points of vehicular crossings shown and stabilized(mountable berm). _e.Standard detail and construction specifications �19.Temporary Swales(interceptor,perimeter). _a.Practice meets purpose and design criteria. _b.Contributing drainage area shown. _c.Channel grade exceeding_%slope properly stabilized. _d.Adequate outlet or discharge condition. _e.Provisions for traffic crossing shown on plan. _f.Standard detail and construction specifications [NG 20.Traps(Rip-rap,earth,pipe,and storm inlet). _a.Practice meets purpose and design criteria _b.Contributing drainage area delineated on plan. _c.Trap sized by largest drainage area(existing or developed)to trap. _d.Type and size of outlet structure. _e.Outlet conditions. _f.Plan view of trap and storage area(drawn to scale with bottom dimensioned _g.Volume calculations. _h.Bottom,crest and clean-out(at 50%trap efficiency)elevations. _i.Standard detail and construction specifications 1 C21.Straw Bale Dike and Silt Fence _a.Meets purpose and design criteria _b.Controlled slope less than 100 feet _c.Drainage area less than 1 acre per 100 feet of dike or fence.(for sheet erosion only) _____d.Standard detail and construction specifications NA22.Grade Stabilization Structure(flume,pipe,slope drain,etc.) _a.Meets purpose and design criteria _b.Pipe drain size noted _c.Contributing drainage area shown _d.Standard detail and construction specifications 1*YC_23.Permanent Structural Practices or Sediment Control Measures Exceeding the Design Criteria of the Standard detail. _a.Practice meets purpose and design _b.Drainage area map _c.Runoff calculations _d.Calculations for size,velocity,and Q _e.Standard detail with dimensions and construction specifications C 24.Provisions for protecting cut and fill slopes from surface runoff New York Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control Page n 1 October 1991 -Third Printing Section t X25.Site Grading ! • _a.Maximum created slope of 2 foot horiz.to I foot vert. _b.Slopes requiring regulat maintenance will be no steeper than 3 foot deep. _c.Details of cut and fill slopes shown EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST-Page 3 (AL(z26.Seeding Specification and Notes _a.Seedbed Preparation _b.Permanent seeding(mix and rate)-includes method of application. _c.Temporary seeding(mix and rates)-includes method of application _d.Mulching(includes anchoring method) _e.Sod(type and installation) _f.Fertilizer(amount and type) g.Lime(amount and type) _h.Seeding dates(temporary and Permanent-to cover entire year). /14 G 27.Storm inlets adequately protected(detail required) 28.Stabilized construction entrances shown on plan (detail required) 29.Provisions for sediment and erosion control of areas disturbed for storm drain and utility construction. IAC Storm Drainage _a.Drainage area map and computations _b.Plan and profile indicating pipe size,type,slope,Q,structures,and inlet(type),top and invert elevations _c.Proposed outlet protection dimensions and computations. _d.Constructed outfall ditch or swalc cross-section and flow computations for depth and velocity _e.Profile of outfall sufficient to show natural gradient of accepting channel or conduit. ] _f.Outlet protection of 0%slope for minimum required distance /vA 31.Riprap and Gabions _a.Median stone size and minimum depth of treated section shown on plan. _b:Riprap placed upon approved filter cloth _c.Cross-section detail of treated areas NA 32.Permit notification from other agencies IVA 33.Storm Water Management referred to: Date: Town of.. So InL„b _ City of Village /C34.Sediment Basin or Recharge Basin a.Seedbed preparation,seeding rate and method of application,and mulch details included. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Plans reviewed by:S&1 S maate Reviewed: "7— October 1991-Third Printing Page F3 New York Guidelines for Urban Sectlon 11 Erosion and Sediment Control S ORDER FORM SOIL y NEW YORK GUIDELINES FOR AND WATER URBAN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CONSERVATION SOCIETY The New York Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control contains standards and specifications for erosion and sediment control measures commonly used on construction sites. al. Both vegetative and structural measures (permanent and temporary) are included in the ma The manual is avaluable tool for planners,engineers, local officials,contractors,and others invnuolved in development activities. Copies can be purchased for $25.00 per copy from some county Soil and Water Conservation Districts or directly from the Soil and Water Conservation Society, Empire State Chapter. Check with your county Soil and Water Conservation District for availability before ordering direct. If ordering direct from SWCS make check payable to "Empire State Chapter - SWCS." Mail this form with payment to: Empire State Chapter, SWCS P.O. BOX ' 1686 Syracuse, New York 1320t-1686 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of Copies at$25.00 per copy: Total Amount Enclosed: Name: Address: .1-11- � . .. ...,...._ AL I PE47-/ E 746,5 SCgGE W,arE..esy!<i> 40/7- 41416 yRoPE4ry L.dE. i ------------ 25 - 50 s -- — — .---- s _ F •\ s�0 SS --.._S�� � �� sF0 S s � / O 1, �- 161 11 I II it , j1 I I1 ------------- — ✓) s % I ' •O � \30 I I j A � S ?S / � I I I I I /I I Sm sF I •S O I a 1151,9 S I I SSSr, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERScGy Richard G. Ward, Chairman cz y x Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. u �►+ P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald y'J1pl �.a4Fax (516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards - Telephone (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 27, 1995 Allan Connell USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service Riverhead County Center Room E-16 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Connell: In December 1994, you reviewed the above mentioned subdivision and suggested that the applicant submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan. The Planning Board adopted your suggestion and as part of the environmental review required such a plan. Please see the Planning Board's Conditional Negative Declaration dated March 27, 1995 which outlines the items required by the Planning Board. I have enclosed a copy of the Erosion Control Plan dated June 7, 1995, which was submitted by the applicant. The Planning Board would like your professional opinion in regard to the proposed plan. The applicant has proposed a 15 foot wide common pedestrian accessway to provide access to the sound for the interior lots within the subdivision. Upon receipt of your review, the Planning Board will be referring the plan to the Board of Trustees for review of the location of the proposed accessway. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Please contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, A�Z�1 Melissa Spi o Planner enc. cc: Town Trustees PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 4` 0� BOG Richard G. Ward, Chairman o George Ritchie Latham, Jr. co r) Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski, Jr. q ;',i.:,�. -r^.�� P. O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald '. '• ��! R',(r Southold, New York 11971 �n 'J m Kenneth L. Edwards '� '�+u i11` Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 28, 1995 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on March 27, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency, and as lead agency grant a Conditioned Negative Declaration. Several years ago the area of the site adjacent to the bluff was excavated without a plan for regrading or revegetating. This accelerated the erosion of the site. There is now a large, actively eroding gully located on the site which allows stormwater runoff from the surrounding watershed to be deposited in large quantities into Long Island Sound. The Long Island Sound Study has identified storm water runoff as a major contributor of non-point source pollution entering the sound. The actively eroding gully is located within the three proposed soundfront lots. Development of these lots has the potential to add to the already severe erosion and sedimentation problems. The Planning Board has established certain conditions, noted in the Conditioned Negative Declaration, which will Page 2 Proposed Major Subdivision for Aliperti Estates March 28, 199$ control the existing severe erosion and sedimentation problems and will mitigate the potential for further impacts due to the proposed development. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Enclosed please find a copy of the Conditioned Negative Declaration for your records. Sincerely, I 1 GL1 C( t� ,# Richard G. Ward �!S Chairman enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ;Y�ti , Richard G. Ward, {Chairman , t 'Wt -y f� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett S. McDonald Jr. �, •,'�' =� ' ` '� Southold, Newyork 11971 Mark S. McDonald ' J' ,r, Kenneth L. Edwards �`�a�� r� '��,� Fax (516) 765-3136 "?yam „r- Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review CONDITIONED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant March 27, 1995 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed major subdivision for Aliperti Estates SCTM#: 1000-95-1-3 Location: North side of Oregon Rd., 877 feet west of Alvah's Lane in Mattituck SEAR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted ( X ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( X ) No ( ) Description of Action: Major subdivision of 45.2155 acre parcel into 10 lots. Lot number 1 is 800,000 square feet with a 40,000 square foot building envelope. Lots number 2 -10 range in size from 10,000 square feet to 130,000 square feet. Page 2 SEAR Conditioned Negative Declaration -Aliperti Estates March 27, 1995 Conditions for Conditioned Negative Declaration 1 The existing gully is actively eroding and must be stabilized in the following manner: A. Stormwater runoff from the surrounding watershed must be diverted away from the gully and deposited into a recharge area capable of handling the peak flow from a 10 year 24 hour storm frequency (5 inch rain in 24 hours). B. The side slopes of the gully are near vertical and 'actively eroding. They must be graded to a minimum of one foot horizontal to one foot vertical (1:1) slope and stabilized with a mixture of the following types of vegetation: -American Beach Grass; -A seed mixture containing Big Bluestem and Little Bluestem, Coastal Panic Grass, Switchgrass, and Sand Love Grass or Weeping Love Grass; -Bayberry, Beach Plum, Rogosa Rose. C. The bluff face must be stabilized with one or more of the vegetation types listed above. An erosion and sedimentation control plan, including the stabilization measures outlined above, must be presented with the preliminary subdivision submission in order for the Planning Board to ensure that the erosion and sedimentation problems will be mitigated. 2. The contour lines depicted on the proposed subdivision do not accurately reflect those on site. Actual contour lines must be shown on the preliminary subdivision map to ensure so that the erosion and sedimentation control plan is based on actual site data. 3- The proposed building envelopes shown for the soundfront lots on the map dated October 6, 1994, are set back 100' from the top of bluff. Due to the severe erosion of the bluff, this proposed setback is not sufficient. Page 3 SEQR Conditioned Negative Declaration -Aliperti Estates March 27, 1995 The building envelopes for the soundfront lots must be set back to the extreme south end of the proposed lots. The building envelope depth must be no more than 200 feet from the 60 foot front yard setback shown on the map dated October 6, 1994. A covenant must be placed on the area outside of the building envelope to ensure that no disturbance, other than that included in the erosion and sedimentation control plan, will occur in this area. This covenant must be shown on the map and contained in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. 4. Stairway or other access to the sound shall be subject to approval by the Southold Town Trustees and any other agency having jurisdiction. In order to minimize erosion impacts to the bluffs, access to the sound for all lots in this subdivision (including the soundfront lots) shall be limited to one 15 foot wide common access point. Upon receipt of the preliminary subdivision plans which shall include the actual contour lines and the erosion and sedimentation control plan, the Town Trustees will be asked by the Planning Board to review the adequacy of the location of the proposed 15' pedestrian accessway shown on the map dated October 6, 1994. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned and in accordance with the conditions of this Conditioned Negative Declaration. There has not been any correspondence received from the Department of Health Services Office in the allotted time. Therefore it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Page 4 SEQR Conditioned Negative Declaration -Aliperti Estates March 27, 1995 For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Langdon Marsh, DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Planning Commission Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Dept. Applicant ENB f i Submtsston Wtthoz�f ., —CQver 7 effer Sender: tPeconic S� r�eyors Subject: &Filth �Sf SCTM#: 1000- 95- 1-3 Comments: ��qM fby erasion control PIN 2I � D PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS1h�0� C4G�F Richard G. Ward, Chairman w George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Town Hall,53095 Main Road ,�. '? p Bennett Orlowski, Jr. f P. O. Box 1179 tholMark S. McDonald f��! -1 Abp! SouFax(5t6) 765 3136 New York 1 971 `�" Fax i Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 28, 1995 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on March 27, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency, and as lead agency grant a Conditioned Negative Declaration. Several years ago the area of the site adjacent to the bluff was excavated without a plan for regrading or revegetating. This accelerated the erosion of the site. There is now a large, actively eroding gully located on the site which allows stormwater runoff from the surrounding watershed to be deposited in large quantities into Long Island Sound. The Long Island Sound Study has identified storm water runoff as a major contributor of non-point source pollution entering the sound. The actively eroding gully is located within the three proposed soundfront lots. Development of these lots has the potential to add to the already severe erosion and sedimentation problems. The Planning Board has established certain conditions, noted in the Conditioned Negative Declaration, which will Page 2 Proposed Major Subdivision for Aliperti Estates March 28, 1995 control the existing severe erosion and sedimentation problems and will mitigate the potential for further impacts due to the proposed development. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Enclosed please find a copy of the Conditioned Negative Declaration for your records. Sincerely, Richard G. Wards Chairman enc. � oFoi PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman rC3 ' George Ritchie Latham,Jr. z Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. �� r P. O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald ,' f - sJ�y, Southold, Newyork 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards �Ual ;?; 'a+d„jY Fax (516)765-3136 ` �, � ✓-" Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review CONDITIONED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant March 27, 1995 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed major subdivision for Aliperti Estates SCTM#: 1000-95-1-3 Location: North side of Oregon Rd., 877 feet west of Alvah's Lane in Mattituck SEAR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted ( X ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( X ) No ( ) Description of Action: Major subdivision of 45.2155 acre parcel into 10 lots. Lot number 1 is 800,000 square feet with a 40,000 square foot building envelope. Lots number 2 -10 range in size from 10,000 square feet to 130,000 square feet. Page 2 SEQR Conditioned Negative Declaration -Aliperti Estates March 27, 1995 Conditions for Conditioned Negative Declaration 1 The existing gully is actively eroding and must be stabilized in the following manner: A. Stormwater runoff from the surrounding watershed must be diverted away from the gully and deposited into a recharge area capable of handling the peak flow from a 10 year 24 hour storm frequency (5 inch rain in 24 hours). B. The side slopes of the gully are near vertical and actively eroding. They must be graded to a minimum of one foot horizontal to one foot vertical (1:1) slope and stabilized with a mixture of the following types of vegetation: -American Beach Grass; -A seed mixture containing Big Bluestem and Little Bluestem, Coastal Panic Grass, Switchgrass, and Sand Love Grass or Weeping Love Grass; -Bayberry, Beach Plum, Rogosa Rose. C. The bluff face must be stabilized with one or more of the vegetation types listed above. An erosion and sedimentation control plan, including the stabilization measures outlined above, must be presented with the preliminary subdivision submission in order for the Planning Board to ensure that the erosion and sedimentation problems will be mitigated. 2• The contour lines depicted on the proposed subdivision do not accurately reflect those on site. Actual contour lines must be shown on the preliminary subdivision map to ensure so that the erosion and sedimentation control plan is based on actual site data. 3. The proposed building envelopes shown for the soundfront lots on the map dated October 6, 1994, are set back 100' from the top of bluff. Due to the severe erosion of the bluff, this proposed setback is not sufficient. Page 3 SEQR Conditioned Negative Declaration -Aliperti Estates March 27, 1995 The building envelopes for the soundfront lots must be set back to the extreme south end of the proposed lots. The building envelope depth must be no more than 200 feet from the 60 foot front yard setback shown on the map dated October 6, 1994. A covenant must be placed on the area outside of the building envelope to ensure that no disturbance, other than that included in the erosion and sedimentation control plan, will occur in this area. This covenant must be shown on the map and contained in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. 4. Stairway or other access to the sound shall be subject to approval by the Southold Town Trustees and any other agency having jurisdiction. In order to minimize erosion impacts to the bluffs, access to the sound for all lots in this subdivision (including the soundfront lots) shall be limited to one 15 foot wide common access point. Upon receipt of the preliminary subdivision plans which shall include the actual contour lines and the erosion and sedimentation control plan, the Town Trustees will be asked by the Planning Board to review the adequacy of the location of the proposed 15' pedestrian accessway shown on the map dated October 6, 1994. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned and in accordance with the conditions of this Conditioned Negative Declaration. There has not been any correspondence received from the Department of Health Services Office in the allotted time. Therefore it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. 0 Page 4 SEQR Conditioned Negative Declaration -Aliperti Estates March 27, 1995 For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Langdon Marsh, DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Planning Commission Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Dept. Applicant ENB • �gOM FF01/r � Albert J. Krupski, President y4� C4p 1P16 John Holzapfel, Vice President ZZ y� Town Hall Co 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson ,? P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Garrell Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenzel y'11Q .ate 1 #t �� Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Melissa Spiro, Planning Board FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Pres. Brd. of Trustees RE: Aliperti Estates SCTM ##95-1-3 DATE: March 16, 1995 Based on the submitted information, the Trustees will not have any jurisdiction in this subdivision. We have no problem with your board assuming lead agency. W17 � f•l-iti K — -. — a � F= (-: Z 1 4 �! 2 _ r o. m E r 4' .� .a r h i c 2S. i-1 c =. .� c �� F�'^-/�U CRAMER, V SOC(ATES ✓S ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS ti p6. March 2, 1995 Mr.Richard Ward, Chairman Southolding Hoard Town Halle 95 Main Road P.O.Host 1179 Southold, NY 11971 PC k9dew at EAF Allpet Edaw SCt1M[No. ri000 541-03 Dear Mr. Ward: As per the your request,we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project, Tasks and completed activities are identifi a as follows; 1. Review Part t LEAF The parcel bas been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2 Prepare Pan H LEAF The Part 17 LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our fundings is included below. 3. Environntuatal and 1!4wft Considerations The subject site has been inspected and environmental references con,xrning the site and area have been consulted. The site consists of 45.2155 acres of land and is located in Mattituck,Town of Southold,New York. The site has 308.f4 feet of frontage on the north side of Oregon Road and borders bong Island Sound along the northern property hne. A 1.8 acre lot setoff is located at the southwestern corner of teh subject site. Iuamediately to the north of this setoff, the site is approximately 528 feet wide and narrows to a width of 451.55 feet adjacent to Long Island Sound (410855 feet north of Oregon Road). The proposed action involves the subdivision of the land into 10 lots for simile-family residential use. Lot 1 of the proposed subdivision has been designed as an 800,000 Square foot lot with a 40 000 square foot building envelope. The remainder of Lot 1 (760,000 square feet)Z be placed under an Open Space Conservation FAsement. The remainder of the lots are between 120,000 square feet and 132,CO)sVare feet, with Lots 8, 9 and 10 fronting on Long Island Sound. All of the proposed lou conform to the minimum lot size requirements under R-80 Residential zoning. Access to the lots will be gained via a proposed 50 foot wide b appro)imately 3,275 foot long right-of-way to be improved consistent with Town o specifications. � � ', 4 MAR 66 19" soil THf:L0 TONIN pLANNIG 201P0,_,..n......._� Pie 1 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 ._. - 95 FR I 1 4 : 432 Cr amer *f .� c� r h i IAds FAF ReVI M Field inspection and reference review found the following with regard to site resources, The site was inspected and found to primarily contain soils,conducive to leaching-- Haven loam,Plymouth loamy sand, Sc.0 silt loam, Carver and Plymouth sands and Riverheadsandy loam. The area of I.ots 1 through 7 is generally flat; however,the area of Lots 8, 9 and 10 contains slopes up to 8 to 15 percent. AdditioaWly, the existing bluff on the northern portion of the site coal aius slopes over 35 peroout. Of particular concern on the subject site is a large eroded channel which cuts acral Lots 9 and 10 and extends to the beach front. The slopes within the channel are steep to nearly vertical and are actively eroding. The area around the head of the channel is lower than the surrounding area by approximately 4 feet, apparently due to previous excavation activity. An agricultural,field occupies the grog of Lots 1 through 7. tots 8,9 and 10 are presently occupied by old field vegetation including choke cherry and barberry,with moderately trees (primarily black cherry) appr the top of the bluff. The site,the northern portion m pattacular, is anttapated to support various species of avian wildlife and small manumak• the elevation of groundwater beneath the site is about 1 foot above mega sea level (msl) and the average site elevation is about 60 feet msl, providing adequ"b depth to groundwater for leaching systems• According to the North Fork Wau.r Supply Plan mum,it appear that several of the southern lots may be located within the Water B du get Area. Simi,& ly, the Nitrate Contamination Areas map, depicting areas having groundwater nitrate concentrations over 8 mg/1, appears to include the southern lots of the subject subdivision. The area of the proposed lop; do not appear to be 9piScantly impacted by aldicarb contamination. If private well's are intended to be ufiized by each of the lots for drinking water supply, adequate venter source for each lot will have to be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the SCDHS. The lands to the east and west of the prosod lots are wooded and vacant. Agricultural use as dominates areto the soutrsoutheast and southwest of the site,with single-family residences located along Oregon Road. The proposed project will not create an undue burden on environmental or community resources. It is recommended that building envelopes for tots 8, 9 and 10 be. situated as close to the southern lot lines as possible, landscaping and soil stabilization plans should be required to minimize the potential for further impacts to the area of the erosion channel. Grading and plantings are recommended to divert stormwater runoff from the head of the channel and impede further erosion of the slopes. A covenwtt to ensure minimal distubance to the northern portion of the site may be required as a mitigation measure. Gutters,leaders and dry wells should be provided for impervious surfaces on each of the northern lots. It is recommended that efforts be made to control acm;s down the bluff to Long Island Sound. This could be accomplished by the construction of stairs to access the beach. Common access to the stairs may be provided through a bomeowners association. If the Board is in agreement with this review, the proposed action does not appear to warrant the preparation of an environmental impact statement, therefore a negative declaration'wott7d be appropriate. The Board should ensure that site use and design are addressed to their satisfaction through deliberation and hearings on the proj,:ct. CRAMER, V SOGIATES raez ENVIRONMENT AN , G CONSULTANTS Allpertt Grtatcr Loon La Revkv If you have auy quesuous or wish any further input with regard to this matter,please do not hesitate to C D ounoorhis, tMP, AICP enc: Long E:AF Parrs I &II ��,,�' CRAMER, VC SOCIATESpop 3 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS (2187)-7c • 617.21 • SEC Appendix A State Environmental ouality Review FULL ENVIF;ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a pruc cant is not afw ly, thor eme are may specbe its ofcart. The projectquestion aresubject subjective or unaction m a ureablis, It ibe s also understood sthat those easy to who demi significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technicaily expert In environmen analysis. in addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affect: the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinat! process has been orderly, comprehensive is nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a praiect or actio Full EAF Components: The full EAF is'comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and Its site. By Identifying basic prof. data, It assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on Identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provi• guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether It is a potentia' large impact. The form also identiiie$ whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--�/Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: t3! Part 1 L Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supportin information, and considering both the macitude and importance of each Frrnpact, it is reasonably determined by the lead aggncy that: P1dY A. The project will not result in any large and Important impact($) and, therefore, is one which will nog have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. 0 B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a slgnificaA; effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measuress�escribed in PAF, 3 have been required therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' O C. The project may result In one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impaG on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared, A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions e opt" Name of Action N:une of Lead Arrancy ~� Print or Type Name of Respunsfutc 01(iccr m Lead Aicncy Tide of Rosponsibia Officer Sie;naturc of RcspOnsihlc Ofiircr in Lydd Ar;!•ncy • liture ul I'rC it r diff, jr FRI date . .r r - ,.. - ± = r n: t 1 4 E74 C: r o. m a r 'Naar :"• i c- u A =- sac ^ 5 F _ OF • -,;'ART 1—PROJECT 1NF0P*T0vN Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to sssist ;n determining whether the action proposed may have a significant e on the environment, Please complete the entire form, Parts A through £. Answers to these questions will be consid -as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additi information you believe will be needed to compiete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently t,va)labie and will not itiv new studies,research or investigation, If information requiting such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and sp+ each instance. NAME OFACTION _ A-6 � 0E l/ C 0 7- 40CATION OF ACTION(Includ6 Stratt A,=*ss, MUniClpallly 2nd County) I NAME OP APP4ICANTISPONSOR &JSLVESs TELEPHONE A_ G�� ADDRESS CITYIPO �� T 5`ATE ZIP CODE NANIC OF OWNER(if datorano aGSINESS TE:.EPMONE ADDRESS CITYIPO 0"eSCRIPTI0N OF ACT(Oti� Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: QUrban Cldvstrial OCornmercial M- residential (suburbnn) Mural (non•f oForest 21Ag6culture OOther 2• Total acreage of proiect area: _� acres. APPROXIMATE ACREACE PRESENTLY AFTER CONIPLETIO Meadow or Srushlar.d (vor. ngrieulte,raq ace. Forested _ ----- _ acres _.�_.. -- acr: Agricultural (Inciudei orcha:Cs, erop!and. p.;sture, utc.) _ 3 )Cres Wetland (Fres )water or tidal as per Articles 1,1, 25 of EC;.) r—. _ )Cres acr• Water Surface Area _. )Cres acre Unvegotated (Rock, earth or fill) _ acres act, Roads, buildings and other paved surfacos _ _ acres Other (Indicate type.) _. _.. _ __ _p_ noes 3. Khat is predominant soil rype(s) on plujeCt situ? hVy !L_1�27m.CI mQ�t ger Set me/ J a. Soil (IfIIina};e; uaVClt 11rai,ned ,. % of Site ��hlt't(—lCr`atf•l WCII <!r.tinn(I z'c' _ % of site GPOoriy elralnral ____ 01, of site: b. it ally agric:Ilturdl lend is involver!, how many actv.1 of swl a(P classified within i0J };roup t through 4 of the Land Classification Systomi —,— acres. (Scst T NYCRR 33?0) 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on prolect site? CYes JNo �ORrV1/ C <�YVt✓ t P1rfi no: wa. What is depth to bedrock? _ � (in fc,:t) SgriefS -'l' PIVer—ke*it.c w.c 2 s'Rn du /04,-P" i t 5: Approximate percentage of pro o;y)reject site with slopes; 00.10 % + 010-1506 0115°b 8f7 a gF sr r6 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or cgntain a building, site, or district, fisted on the 54 alegr`ttre'Nation, Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes QNo 7:-Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Oyes ON 8. What Is the depth of the water table? -$O (in feet) ( 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? X1Ves� V,0 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Oyes 061-0 11. Does project site Contain any species of plant or animal life that is Identified as threatened or endangered Oyes No According to Identify each species 12, Are there any uniq�}e or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geotosfeal formation- Oyes ®No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open ipace or recreation- area Oyes q4o If yes, explain —_ 1.4. Does the present.s//te include scenic views known to be important to the community? Oyes t�No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a, Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary . 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name _ b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ayes fro a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Dyes ONO b) If Yes, will Improvements be necessary to allow connecnion? ❑Yes ONo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-A/ Section 303 and 304? Dyes ONO 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguo�us/to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6171 Oyes i{�No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous writ?, 11Ycs 0<1o B. Project Description " 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project ;fill in dimensions as appropriate) 17 Lf� - _ a. Total contiguous acerae owned or controlled by project sponsor b, Project,acreage to be u'evelepcd: _' acres initially; teres ultimately. C. Project acreacc to remain unJrwetnped I acres. d. Length of project, in miles: _ _ Y (if npprupriate) e. If the project is ar, expansion, indicato percent of oxpansior. proposed o; /. Number of o(f•street parking spaces exi;tMl; prolwsed g. Maximum vehicular trips cennrated per hour - (open cemph Non of proje<:Q? h, If residential; Number and typo of housing units: Cnc 1- ily rwu family Nlrtfliplu I'pmily Condominium Initially Ultimately L Dimensions (in feet) of largest propnsad structure -3:5' height; r,r> width; . L(2 _ length. J, Linear (oet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? It 3 z..uow much natural rnaterit,i i `,xk, earth. etc ) will be rempvcd f9 th�itc? 3, Will di,turbed areas be re ed? qy,s dNo �n tons/cubic vard a, 1f yes', for what intend,, purpose Is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be srockpi!ed for reclamation? 0Yes ONO C' Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Oyes ONO 4. kOw many acres of yemetation (troes, shrubs, ground COversi will be removed from site? 5, Neill any maturerforest (over 140 years old) or other Iocall • —"-^�- - acres. Oyes NO y important vegetation be re"novad by this project? 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction C 7, if multi-phased: — -�- months, (including demolition). a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). l), Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 r . c. Approximate completion date of final phase month Year. (including demolition) phase 1 functionally pendent on suP month yrsr. p Ctionall de bsegvent phases?' d. Is Oyes No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? '"Dyes YCN0 9. Number of jobs generated; during construction after project is cornplete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project r�Qag 11, Will prolect require relocation of any projects ar facilltie<? (Dyes liNo If res, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? C3 Yes (�No '�� a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent wil( be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ONo Type ,_tr �h, 14. Will surface area of an existing water bOdy increase or decrease b s �T ' Y i Lf�'>N Explain v Pro o.al? --Yes No 4 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Oyes �J, o 16, Willi the project generate solid waste? X[es t13'rNo UL'r1$4 a. If yes, what is the amount per month tonoillil OFl� )Q(Zt4tXQk�;S�C�C!) b, If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Oyes ONO C, if yes, give name Iorat"on d. Will any wastes not 80 into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landiill? Oyes ONO e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? [Dyes wrvo a. If yes, what is the anticipa;cd rate of disposal? _,_,_. tons/rn6, l b. If yes, what is the. aetieipawd site life? —___ years, 18. Will project use herbicides or p;sticides? Oyes (��o 19, Will project routinely produce odors (more t6,tn on<r hour per day)? C?1'as ;u 20. Will project produce operating n01ie exceeding the luc.,tl ambient noise I w�is? t�Ye; ,/ r�, Ut�o 21, Will project lin an incrujiu in enargy ui<r? ;%Yes ONo If yes , indicate type(s) -_!��g tot tIMLlc4rsps tta ��_3st -S �e 22. 1f water suPPIY Is from w,•.II , int! ocsG [i;umirint; Calr�u.ity _ ., gallunS/'minu.e• C K• L� 23. 'total anticipated warer us,sga per day a "E, [ agaifu,r:;c]ay 24. 00cs project involve Local, State or l4:deral luridinl; r QYes No If Yes, explain 4 • \J • Submit City, Town, V llage Boned ©Yes ON �L Datio City, Town, Village planning Board a4es ONO -City, To1vn Zoning Board ^- Oyes ONO City, County Health Department Yes 0N Other Local Agencies QYes ONO Other Regi000l Agencles QYes ONO State Agencies GKes O.N -Federal Agencios ❑Yes ONO 0. Zoning and Planning Information // ^� 1, Does proposed action Involve a planning or zoning decision? QYes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment Ozoning variance Ospecial useermit tJnewlrevislon of master pian Oresourre mana>:ement plan ❑otheubdivl;ion 011ie plan 2• What is the zoning classlfication(s)of the site? Edi ae>sJ �e 'EE 3. What Is the maximum potential development of the site If developed as permitted by the present Zoning? z ��s 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? �' `--`" S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land us 7. pians? Yes h 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/. mile radius of proposed altion? �d G 00 51?-F .��F 8• is the proposed action compatible with adjoiningisurrounding land uses within a 3: mile? des OI 9, If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? f 0 A. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 1 cS9 10, Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of'yetver or water districts?distrix Qy ^ es 11. Will the proposed act create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, poGr fire protection)? ❑Yes Quo a. If yes, is existing cap,city sufficient to handle prvicrted d;mand? QYes ONO 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? QYes p a. If yes, is the existing road network otloquatc to handle the additional traffic? Oyes LINO D. Informational Details Attach any additionsl r propoUon li may bu needed to c!anfy your project. If (hero aro or may be any advor, imp.,cts associated with your propnsar, plsr:Ise disrwss sur,h impars and the measures which you propose to any adto r avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the infomlation providoil is true to tho best of my knuwlcdga Applicant!$ptmsor n::me �_� Signature pate Title 11 the action is in the Coasts! Area, and yutr arc a state agency, complete Ibe Caastal Assessmenr form before proceedint with this assessment, y Part 2—PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE • Responsibipty of teat AS"* Central Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and Aeterminations reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily lignin Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 $i asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and whertver possible the threshc magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the Stat for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples arsd)or loner thresholds may be appro( for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The Impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each que. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Insilructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2, Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers, c. if answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size o impact. if impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. if impact will occur but thres is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PA: e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in, the project to a small to mod. impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction Is not possible. ,.must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact IMPACT ON LAND _ Moderate Faroe mitipatec 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical chaage tv project site? impact Projtict Chau NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 1546 or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 O D oyes of foot of length), or where the genera! slopes in the project area exceed • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ O Oyes ❑; 3 feet • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. n ❑ ❑yes O! • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ O ❑Yes ❑ 3 feet of existing ground surface. •.Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ U Oyes O than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 0 ❑ ❑Yes n, tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. 0 O ❑Yes ❑ • Construction in a designated fioodway. © ❑ OYes ❑ • Other impacts ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑ 2. Will there be an effect tr_ _.,y unique or unusual landorms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.RNO OYES • Specific land forms: 0 0 ❑Yes 0 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact ha 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Lupe Mitlpah (Under Articles 15, 24, 2S of the Environmental Conserv tion law, ECU Impact Impact Protect C Examples that would apply to column 2 NO OYES • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. 0 ❑ Oyes 0 • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑ protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body, ❑ Q Dye, ❑ • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. O O Oyes ❑ • Other Impacts: O ❑ Dyes O 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing r new body of water? I(NNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water El Dyes 0; or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. D O Oyes ❑i • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes Qi 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? I XNO DYES Examples that would apply tq column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. O O Dyes ❑ • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑ have approval to;serve proposed(pro*t) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ Oyes O gallons per minute pumping Capacity, • Construction of operation causing any contamination of a water O ❑ ❑Yes ❑ supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater, ❑ O Wes ❑ • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities wh: h presently O O Dyes ❑ do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ O Dyes O day. • Proposed Action will likel -.Bv3o siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ Gves C existing body of water iv tt.? aslant that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ O ❑yes C products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ O Dyes C and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locatas commercial andlor industrial uses which may ❑ O Dyes C require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts* ❑ O Dyes C fj, Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patternsl or surface water runoff? 0 OYES t s a --- II to Potnntlal Can Impact ez Modorate Large Mltlgsted e3y Impact Impact Project Chan; a Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. O i❑ Oyes ONo a Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. D ❑ Dyes ONO a Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. D ❑ Oyes ❑No 0. Other impacts: D 0 Oyes ONO IMPACT ON AIR 7, Will proposed action affect air qualityt )(NO OYES txampks that would apply to column 2 a Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO Mur. a Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of O O Dyes ❑CJo refuseper hour, a Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs, per hour or a 0 O Oyes ONO heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per four. a Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO to industrial use. s Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ O Oyes ❑No development within existing Industrial areas. a Other Impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes ONc IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or ends g ed species? )NO . OYES txampks that riould apply to column 2 a Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or federal O 0 ❑Yes 'ONc . list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. 6 Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat_ O ❑ Dyes ONc a Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other © O ❑Yes ❑Nc than for agricultural purposes. a Other impacts: O O Dyes ON, 9, Will Proposed Action substantially allect non-threat or non-endangered species? NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 a Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or O O Dyes ONc migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. s Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ O OYes ONc of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land rewurces? f,NO KYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ O Dyes ON, land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) • ' 2 S mall to Potanllal Can Impact Moderate targe Mitigated i Impact Impact Project Chm • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of O G Oyes ©N. agricultural land, • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres D Dyes . of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultuta) District more than 2.S acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent Installation of agricultural O O Oyes ON. land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: _ O O Dyes ONk IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? O OYES (if necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Se tion 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from D 0 Dyes ONO or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of D D Oyes ❑Nc aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ O ©Yes DNC screening of scenic views known to be Important to the area. • Other Impacts: _ D D Oyes ONO IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure q( historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially O O Dyes ONO contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the IO ❑ ❑Yet ONo project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts? ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE: AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 0 OYES ( ?The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. O O Dyes ONO Y A major reduction of an open space important to the community. O O Oyes ONo • Other impacts: 0 0 0Yes ONO IMPACT *TRANSPORTATION • 3 Small to Potential Can Ime 14, Will there be an effect to existing transportation $y t st Moderate Large Mlt1gat NO OYES Impact Impact Project r Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. 0 Q Dyes • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. Q , O DYes • Other impacts: O ❑ Oyes IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sour ± of fuel or energy supplyt ANO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ O Oyes any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy O ❑ Dyes transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or Industrial use. • Other impacts: O O Oyes NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there I>e objectionable odors, noise, or vibratioty as a result of the Proposed ActlortlNO 1 DYES' Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive O O Oyes i facility. • Odors will occur. routinely (more than one hour per day}. _ O U Oyes t • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local- O ❑ Dyes ( ambient noise levels for raise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a O O Dyes noise screen. • Other impacts: O ❑ Dyes I IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and sate NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous 0 ❑ Oyes substances (Le, oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any O II O Oyes form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, Irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ O Oyes gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance O © Dyes within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: 0 0 Dyes IMPACT ON QAOIH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact a OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate La►pe Mitigated e) ta. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing comm rtyf Impact Impact Project Cfrarw - Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO �YfS e The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the O O OYes ON, project is located Is likely to grow by more than 5%. e The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services O O Oyes ON will increase by more than 5% pet year as a result of this project. e Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. O O Oyes ON. e Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use, X O Oyes XN- e Proposed Action will replace w eliminate existing facilities, structures O ❑ OYes ON or areas of historic importance to the community, e Development will create a demand for additional community services O 0 OYes ON (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) e Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. O ❑ OYes ON e Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. O O OYes ON e Other Impacts: O O OYes ON ' 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controvIg�YY relatesl to potential adverse environmental impactsf ANO DYES If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF GMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency part 3 must be prepared if one or, more Impacf(s) is considered to be potentially targe, wen if the Impact(s) may mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderai a impact by project Chang 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: e The probability of the impact occurring e The duration of the impact e Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value e Whether the impact can or will be controlled e The regional consequence of the impact e Its potential divergence from local needs and goals e Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact, (Continue on attachments) Submission Without A Cover Letter Date: 3 1 to JqSS Sender: Pcconi(- Surveyors Subject: M i Penh E s tate s SCTM*: 1000- 9 s- 1- 3 Comments: Z prints p MS re res r SOUTHOLD_ PLANNING;.. SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: oZI3I�S SENDER: 161)y Alii - ' ' SUBJECT: I I pati SCT,-In : °5- COMMENTS: FOO L- nv • keWiC4V- ff,E- ' t FEB 61995 VLAM PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. P.O. Box 909 54655 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 516-765-5020 FAX 516-765-1797 John T.Metzger,L.S. T .eb. 3, iag5 Ike : p lpara g. + 465 1000 - q5 - 01 - o3 i n n+s a Oar heel a5 red u 64,d �y Me i ssa �OgUFfO(k -,..:.....PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS N �`'� I C0 8y f� o= Town Hall,53095 Win Road Richard G.Ward, Chairman y W [; ° rZ P. O. Box 1179 George Ritchie Latham, Jr. O� •_� t4 Southold, New York 11971 BMark 3.McDonald r r01 r a�� Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE .L, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 2, 1995 J. Cramer, Voorhis & Associates Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Rd. Miller Place, NY 11764 Re: Review of EAF Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Messrs. Cramer & Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment fore for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Also enclosed are: 1. Copy of map dated October 6, 1994. 2. The Planning Board's resolution dated February 7, 1995. 3. Report from Natural Resources Conservation Service, dated December 7, 1994. The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on February 6, 1995. The $400.00 review fee has been submitted by the applicant. If all is in order, the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the March 13, 1995 public meetirg Please submit your report no later than March 3, 1995 in order for the Board to review it before the meeting date. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, � - cv-- Melissa Spiro Planner encs. 1y ' a 1,140dMLPS.'.. .. ... .:Ytnn: ♦ rv: ....s...... '.'J „ .LANNING BOARD MEMBERS :Richard G.Ward, Chairmana) _— Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S.McDonald .�✓ - Southold,New York 11971 • yam,: Kenneth L. Edwards i Fax(516)765-3136765-1 - Telephone(516)765-f 938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD iz'.Drugry 7, 1995 ” 7 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: I; er f Es+oA SGTM '� rcoo 95 r 3 Requested Action: �]g; s��ct;u 5i r, �� Li5 " I5s gyre I_INTO ib iO+S W� I VI RCb COo Y ��. Lulr10, boy e, t^d l�t;w e�we.(ooe Lu}� 1 - to / SP ro s'-re Gb'V\ i09 0001-A SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (�) Unlisted Contact Person: /��,(;r- Sn„r_ a (516) 765-1938 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. k' Planning Board Position: This agency wishes to assume lead agen Jy status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: r �6soo. SC�2 �Ign'n�N� --- reSolo a•� of 217(45 tO2 udc�,�-fo„o-'l Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Si cerely, n �A � y Wil• ��� Richard G. Ward /)05 Chairman cc: Board of Appeals *Board of Trustees Beildw -Dapa4nu" Southold Town Board *Suffolk County Department of Health Services 'INYSDEC - Stony Brook '%YSDEC - Albany �tffelk�oar�ty-Bepartmer�t-o€-RablisWor�cs U7S-. Afmy-Aff3-of-E iglnears Newer erk-State-Department-ot-Transportation 'Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 L Jrz 4,: Y rir, ,F 114"16-2 (2187)-7c • 617.21 S EQ R Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. Itis also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive it nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: EE Part 1 (J Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead a ncy that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. - ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measureadescribed in PART 3 have been required, [herefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* _ ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ` A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency tureof I'r, ar r diff r FSB g �� Date 1 SOUTfiOLD 70'A'iV PLANVNIG '4 1) ' •ART 1—PROJECT INFORMAT9 Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered -as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona! information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and county) (9 -E , nr/ U,—G , r� h/rV✓ vrz� NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION 5�13D7✓/Siam oz G1+,.i0 »M Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. ustrial ❑Commercial ❑3R,esidential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) 1. Present land use: OUrban 0!0 ❑Forest [ Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 45 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) y acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 3 acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? --// a. Soil drainage: :C7<Nell drained _go % of site L?Moderately well drained ZO 40 of site ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 3370). ` 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes EI/No �. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) _ 5. Approximate percentage of propoflxoject site with slopes: 00-10% % 010-15% Z'J % 015% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or c99ntain a building, site, or district, listed on the Statear the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes C7No 7.-Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? QYes ❑No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 50 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes R(No Ge No Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes GeNo 11. Does projectsite c9ntain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Oyes No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unigye or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ❑Yes Xci Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes C/l o If yes, explain 14. Does the present�sJ to include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes Aci 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Dyes 0640 a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Dyes ❑No y b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Dyes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes ❑No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Oyes fl(No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wasrk? ❑Yes (B/No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor - acres. b. Project. acreage to be developed: 61 acres initially; acres ultimately. e. Project acreage to remain undeveloped /9 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: - (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed — %; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing _ ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour — (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One F ily Two Iamdy Midtiple I-amily Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure -2fT height; '>e'� width: length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? .309 ft. 3 r. 2 ,How much natural material (i.ock, earth, etc.) will be rem�ved from tfll�site? tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Dyes ONO pN/A a. If yes, for what intend_- purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction G months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month �— year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes [3No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes VdNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project NaN� 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities//? OYes I No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ClYes ft3No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? fetes ONO Type SING -C- 1=p.1-11c 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ENO Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? OYes No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? OYes [ANo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? OYes ONO c. If yes, give name ; locatibn d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ONO e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Oyes [tiNO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes f31No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes 91"No � 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes LINO 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Oyes ONo If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumtiinq capacity gallons/mnmite. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day _ '- o o Ugallons/day. c C 24. Does project involve local, State or federal funding? Dyes fJNo If Yes, explain 4 �- 2S: Approvals Required: . Submittal e Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes ❑No City, Town, Village Planning Board MB es ❑No PLGN 4/ [ Fie, /9 93 -City, Town Zoning Board ❑0 es ❑No City, County Health Department L1Yes ❑No r^"4,111.ry Other Local Agencies Dyes ❑No Other Regional Agencies Dyes ❑No State Agencies 12Yes ❑No 'P e- Federal Agencies Dyes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information �// 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? L�JYes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit IF'Jsubdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? — 00d% 0oV Sa -Iftr 14571 Le r-Tlc� 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? - I [pTS 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes ONO 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a Y, mile? EPYes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? I C) a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 109 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of'yewer or water districts? Dyes 11 . Will the _ I�NO proposed action creates a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Dyes o a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes 13No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts arid the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge Applicant/Sponsor Name Signature Date Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2—POJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR P�NITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. •_Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to th Impact Impact Project Change P Y b project site? F-NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑1'es ONO foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. #� • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than El3 feet. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ 3 feet of existing ground surface. ❑Yes ONO • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ than one phase or stage. ❑Yes ONO • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. ❑Yes ONO • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill, ❑ ❑ • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑les ONO El El • Other impacts ❑1'es ONO El ❑ ❑1'es [:]No 2. Will there be an effect t: ,.,,y ur:,que or unusual land (ol irs found on the site?(i e, cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)lJ ❑YES f. • Specific land forms: ❑ \ ❑ Eyes ONO 6 i • 2 3 _. IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential .Can Impact Be Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservat�' n Law, ECL) - VN ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No protected stream, • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existinyor new body of water? KINO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? IJJJ N0 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ Dyes [:]No C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. .� • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [--]No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveye.]off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the, storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or indnstrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treaunent andior storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns or surface water runoff? [WN 0 ❑ylS Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ 1 ❑Yes ❑No 7 r . • 2 3 - Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change *-Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 1 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? Z NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. j • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ []Yes []No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes []No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endang ed species? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ;h ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatenpd or non-endangered species? j1JN0 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ,� [7N0 /YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land (inclu(Jes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 + ' �'• • 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. (/ • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres 0 ❑ Dyes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ F-1 Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes C1 No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES / 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? NO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ El Yes, ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ - ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? [ NO OYES 4 Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? � Examples that would apply to column 2 MNO OYES The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No .�4 9 IMPACT ON TRSPORTATION 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation 5Y51/ms? Moderate Large Mitigated By Examples that would apply to column 2 NO DYES Impact Impact Project Change • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sour�c of fuel or energy supply? ZNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ []Yes 13 No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibratio as a result of the Proposed Action? - IJeNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [-]No facility. _ • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safetyr YJNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of El Yes []No accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ gas or other flammable liquids. ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action may result in the ex(avation or other disturbance ❑ within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ❑ ❑Yes ONO waste. E • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 1 10 4 ••• i. IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 1 2 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact Be 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existin community? Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No Project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ or areas of historic importance to the community. El ❑Yes ❑No • Developm,2nt will create a demand for additional community services ❑ (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to Potential adverse environmental impacts? LJNO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be Mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider. • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 71 v _ • . • i ��gUFFO(�-o PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ,0 Gam, Richard G. Ward, Chairman y it Z Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. 1,:- ;r P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonalda�7J�'rFax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards "L f Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 7, 1995 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on February 6, 1995: WHEREAS, B. Anthony Aliperti has applied to subdivide a 45.2155 acre parcel (SCTM# 1000-95-1-3) into 10 residential lots; and WHEREAS, this proposed subdivision Is not designed as a cluster subdivision, however, Lot Number 1 has been designed as a 800,000 square foot lot containing a 40,000 square foot building envelope and a 760,000 square foot Open Space Conservation Easement and Lots 2 through 10 have been designed as lots ranging in size from 113,000 square feet to 130,000 square feet; and WHEREAS, the layout described above has been presented with the condition that there shall be no further subdivision of any lot in perpetuity, and Page 2 MaJor subdivision for Alipertl Estates February 7, 1995 WHEREAS, a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance for approval of insufficient lot width of three proposed parcels shown on a proposed subdivision for Rial Reality Corp. (SCTM# 1000-95-1-3) which is now the subject property, was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals in a decision rendered on October 10, 1986; and WHEREAS, on December 11, 1992, the Planning Board requested a determination by the Z.B.A. In regard to the validity of the October 10, 1986 decision in that the proposal before the Planning Board (map dated Dec. 3, 1992) for the soundfront lots was similar, but not exactly the same as that before the Zoning Board of Appeals in 1986; and WHEREAS, in a memorandum dated December 31, 1992, the Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman advised the Planning Board that Z.B.A. determinations run with the land and that there had not been any adverse changes in the configuration of the three lots under the lot width variance, and that the variance remains and a new application was not required; and, be it therefore, RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination on this unlisted action; and Be it further RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated October 6, 1994, with the following conditions: 1. The location of the building envelopes staked In the field for the soundfront lots (Lots 8, 9 and 10) have not been accepted by the Planning Board and are subject to further review by the Planning Board during the SEQR process. 2. A major gully cuts across the proposed soundfront lots causing severe erosion and sedimentation problems. Stabilization of the gully and the effect of the gully on the location of the building envelopes for the soundfront lots are subject to further review by the Planning Board during the SEQR process. 3. The subdivision is to be designed so that the beach area, from the toe of the bluff north, shall be owned by a HomeownersAssociation. In addition, a common pedestrian accessway to the beach must be designed. 4. Building envelopes must be shown for Lots 2-7. The building envelopes shall not be larger than 40,000 square feet in area. All structures, Page 3 Major subdivision for Aliperti Estates February 7, 1995 other than fences must be contained within the building envelope. This restriction must be noted In a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. 5. The area outside the building envelope for Lot 1 must be labeled as an Open Space Conservation Easement. All structures, other than fences must be contained within the building envelope. Covenants and Restrictions will be required for the Open Space Conservation Easement. These will be determined upon completion of the environmental review. 6. The proposed road must be shown as a separate parcel owned by the Homeowners Association. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of the preliminary maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The preliminary subdivision must include road profiles and drainage plans. After the preliminary maps have been accepted by the Planning Board, they will be forwarded to the Engineering Inspector and the Suffolk County Planning Commission for review. The preliminary hearing will not be scheduled until the maps have been reviewed by the Engineering Inspector and the Planning Commission, and the environmental review has been completed. Additional covenants and restrictions will be required after the above mentioned reviews are completed. For that reason, it is not necessary to prepare the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions at this time. Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely., &4vn & gel Richard G. Ward 415 Chairman cc: Zoning Board of Appeals �tS SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: i I jz. 195 SENDER:-eco, , c- i SUBJECT: SCTM4 : COI24ENTS: ~ PLANNIIM,BOAM �t PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS -• Richard G. Ward, Chairman n Road 53095 Town Hall, Mai George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. 1, Box Mai Bennett Orlowski,Jr. 179 Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald ' ` Kenneth L. Edwards - ��t ,,,, Fax(516)765-3136 Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD rl'-�ruar%1 7, 1995 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: �I I;"rl ES+aA-ec SCTM i000 - 95-i-3 Requested Action: fir« Io r se 'v s• e r� IC�9 mon �� (� SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type 1� (�) Unlisted Contact Person: (516) 765-1938 : a Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ()( ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this actino. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: �'eQso- tt6ee ��gnn�Nc, �.JOQP�` reso1l +;o•n of 'Z/7/95 1OrZ ad.�;�-tnr, \N'�prYYgJrO^f� '�f'�'41N�CN1( 0 -MiS Please feel free to contact this office for further information. S'cer ly, / Richard G. Ward 4.S Chairman cc: Board of Appeals *Board of Trustees awdi I944palu"PA Southold Town Board *Suffolk County Department of Health Services 'FNYSDEC - Stony Brook ''NYSDEC - Albany *Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 r ► � 3�q5 eceved Olo�;�cw� w. Rom 11. /°eJ�zg¢25 a��lice els PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 4 ' Richard G. Ward, Chairman y ( Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 1 " Southold, New York 11971 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. -�:',+n Fax (516)765-3136 Mark S. McDonald �! V Kenneth L. Edwards --; Telephone (516)765-1938 .�T� . PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 20, 1994 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: Enclosed please find a copy of the December 7, 1994, report from Allan Connell in regard to the above mentioned property. The Planning Board will reserve comment on the report until the proposed building envelopes for the soundfront lots have been inspected. As noted in my letter of November 15, 1994, the Board will conduct a field inspection to review the proposed building envelope locations upon notification from you that the envelope locations have been staked. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. SiJncccerely, /'�" . Melissa Spud Planner enc. m5 United States Natural Resources Riverhead County Center Department of Conservation Room F_-16 Agriculture Service Riverhead, New York 11901 December 7, 1994 Mr. Richard Ward Chairman , Planning Board office O Town of Southold P.O . Box 1179 ry Southoi6 , %Y - iJ71 - # Dear Mr. Aard : have competed my review of the proposer n-�aior subdivision known as Aiiperti Estates . incTarea designates as open space , lot one ;n the site plan , is well suites production and is by far the nest area of the entire parcel Tor that purpose . The soli within lot one is identified as Haven clam, 0 - 3 percent slopes (HaA) . This soil type is considered prime farm land and = well suited to ali crops common ; , grown in the county . There is littie or no slope within anis area -.nus erosion will not be a problem. The area of most concern is within lots eight through ..en . .4 major gully cuts across these lots causing severe erosion and sedimentation problems . Runoff from the surrounding watershed is depositing large quantities of storm water runoff into Long Island Sound . Storm water runoff has been identified as a major contributor of non point source po ; lur- ion entering the sound in the Long island Sound Study . It appears as if the area at the head of the gully was previously excavated three to foiur feet, creating .,j depression which is now lower than the surrounding landscape . This may nave been done to reduce the volume_ of runoff entering the gully . in any event , the contour lines depicted on the site ;. Ian da not accurately reflect the current situation and should be corrected . The existing gully s'nould also be accurately shown on the site plan because it is limiting the buildable area within lots eight and nine . It is actively eroding and must be stabilizes . Runoff should be diverted away from the gully and deposited into a suitable recharge area capabie of handling the peak flow from a 10 year 24 hour storm frequency (S inch rain in 24 hours) . The side slopes are near vertical and actively eroding . They should be graded to a minimum of one foot horizontal to one foot vertical ( 1 : 1 ) and stabilized with suitable vegetation . i would recommend that the applicant submit an erosion and sedimentation control ricr to site plan approval . We could review the adequac -- ri a r an upon request . Houses cted within lots eight through ten should be set back to creme south end of each lot or not allowed at all due to err- erosion of the bluff . Given the Town Trustees current on the construction of bulkheads , which states that nes. pads a ong the sound are a last resort and are not recomme encouraged . It would behoove the applicant to set the hou = —,nese ots as far back as possible . Plantings are preferr : stabilize the bluff . If a bulkhead is permitted , it must be -d with sand and maintained , which would be a major expense a home owner due to the instability of this bluff . Plans f : : . Ilza- ion of the bluff face should aiso be adcress< he erosion and sedimentation control pian . Hopefu- wili find -,'nese comments helpful in your deliDer ,,: over tnis project. if you have further questions or neee '. cation on any item feel free to contact me . Si ncer,e i AIIan S . el Distric arvationis= Page - Soll Conserna _ - V lce 12/7/94 ------------------------------._------------------------------------------- ONTECHNICA.L SOILS DESCRIPTION REPORT OR DESCRIPTION CATEGORY — GEN Survey Area— 'SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK; -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Map Symoo ! Uescri , tlsn Ha.A -'A _`J DAM ., u 5w — T _. I rt_.ve:: — . . s AHBA. , Fran, Ha L' , He) . Haven soils are Camp , well cralnec , medium—textured soils that formed In a loamy or silty layer over stratifies coarse sand and gravel . The texture from 0 to 19 inches is loam , silt loam, and very rine sandy loam. From 19 to 28 inches the range is silt loam, very fine sandy loam , and gravelly loam, while the texture from 28 to 55 inches is gravelly sand , loamy sand , sandy loam or stratified sand and gravel . The permeability is mocerate in the root zone (surface layer and subsoil ) and rapid or very rapid in the uncerIying layer . These soIis nave mocerate to hign avai : abie moisture capacities . haven soils 'nave low organic matter content arse low natural supply of plant nutrients , out crops respond, wei � to gime and fertilizer . When the soils are intensively cuitivated the likelinood of crusting is great, nowever the returning of cover crop residue cecreases this problem. Generally , these soils are weil suited to crops commonly grown in Suffolk County . HaB HAVEN LOAM , 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES Maven Soils (HaA, HaB, HaC , He) . Haven soils are deep , well drained , medium—texturea soils that formed in a loamy or silty layer over- stratified coarse sana and gravel . The texture from 0 to 19 inches is loam, silt loam, and very fine sandy loam. From 19 to 28 inches the range is silt loam, very fine sandy loam, and gravelly loam, while the texture from 28 to 55 inches is gravelly sand , loamy sand , sandy loam or stratified sand and gravel . The permeability is moderate in the root zone (surface layer and subsoil ) and rapid or very rapid In the unceriying layer . These soils rave mocerate to high: avallaGle moisture capacities . Haven soils nave low organic matter content and low natural supply of plant nutrients , but crops respond well to lime and fertilizer. When the soils are intensively cultivated the likelihood of crusting is great, however the returning of cover crop residue cecreases this problem. Generaliy , these soils are well suited ..o crops commonly grown in Suffolk County . -/S . Department of Ag6lture ' ?age- age -- /-oil -Cons2/7/94 ----tion Ser, ic----------------------------------------- --------- NONTECHNICAL SOILS DESCRIPTION REPORT FOR DESCRIPTION CATEGORY - GEN Survey Area- SUFFOLK, COUNTY , NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Map Symbol Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PIB PLYMOUTH LOAMY SAND, 3 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES Plymoutn Soils (PIA, PIB, PIC, PmB3, PsA PsB) Plymouth soils consist of deep , excessively drained , coarse-texturea soils that formed in a ia.yer of ioamy sand or sand over thick layers of stratifies coarse sand and gravel . The texture of Plymoutn soils PIA, PIB, PIC, PmB3 and PmC3 from 0 to 27 inches is loamy sand , ioamy fine sand , gravelly foamy Sano a.nd sand . From 27" to S� inches texture is sand ano grave , coarse sand an.: gravelly coarse sand . The permeability of these sciis is - pis . Available moisture capacity of these soils ranges from- ow to very low. Ttese soiis are drougrty dur � rig periods of ! ow rainfall . 'Unless irrigation water appiiee , seep rooted crops are better suitec . Irrigation water can be applied at a rapid rate Dut frequent, small applications should be made to reduce the amount lost to downward movement. The organ - . matter content and natural fertility of these soils low. Crop response to lime and fertilizer is = air . Maintenance of fertility is difficult because c' t ,e sandy texture . Frequent applications of small amounts of fertilizer should be made to reduce nutrient less by leaching . The sandy surface layer reduces the suitabiiity of these soils for nursery stoc;: . ==cause of the above iimitations , these sou s are only * a , rly well suited to crops commonly grown in SuffolK county . PIC PLYMOUTH LOAMY SAND, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES Piymouth Soils (PIA, PIB, PIC, PmB3, PsA Ps8) Plymouth sods consist of deep , excessively drained , coarse-textured soil , tnat formed in a layer of ioamy sand or sand over thick layers or stratified coarse sand and gravel . The textus c- Plymouth soils PIA, PIB , PIC , PmB3 and PmC3 from 0 to 27 inc'rres is loamy sand , ioamy fine sand , gravelly loamy sand and sand . From 27 to 5O incnes the texture is sand and gravel , coarse sane and gravejiy coarse sand . The permeabiiity of these soils is rapid . Available moisture capacity of these soils ranges from low to very low. These soils are droughty during periods of low rainfall . Unless irrigation water is applied , deep rooted crops are better suited . Irrigation water can be applied at a rapid rate but Department of AIture ''gage — I Conservation Service 12%7%94 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- NONTECNNICAL SOILS DESCRIPTION REPCRT FOR DESCRIPTION CATEGORY — GEN Survey Area— SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEN YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Map Symbol Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------- frequent, small applications should be made to reduce the amount lost to downward movement. The organic matter content and natural fertility of these soils is low. Crop response to lime and fertilizer is fair . Maintenance of fertility is difficult because of the sandy texture . Frequent applications of small amounts of fertiiizer should oe made to reduce nutrient foss by learning . The sandy surface layer reduces the suitaDllity of these soils for nursery stock . Because of r_ne above limitations , these soils are only fairly we . i suitec to crops commonly grown in olk County . RdA RIVERHE.AD SANDY LOAM , 0 TO 3 PERCENT SLOPES Riverhead So11s (RdA, Rd-B, RdC) . River'nead soiis are deep , well drainad , moderately coarse textured soils that formed in a layer of sandy loam or rine sandy loam over znicK jayers of Coarse sated and gravel . The texture from 0 to inc'nes ic_ sandy loam and fine sandy loam . Sana , loamy sane , gravelly sant' and g r a v oamy Banc ound at depth of 32 to 65 inches . The perrneabiiity is moderately rapid in the root zone (.surface layer and subsoil ) and very rapid in the underlaying layer. Riverhead soils have moderate to hign available moisture capacities . Natural internal drainage is good , but in many places where these soils have been farmed a pIowpan has formed . These soils have low organic matter contents and low natural supply of plant nutrients , but crops respond well to lime and fertilizer. Genersiiy , these soils are well suited to crops commonly grown in Suffolk County . SdA SCIO SILT LOAM, SANDY SUBSTRATUM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES Scio Soils (Sett, SdA , Sd©) Scio soils are deep , moderately well drained , medium textured soils that formed in a mantie of very fine sandy loam, loam, or silt loam over coarse sand and gravel or compact glacial till . The texture from 0 to 35 i nc�`�es is silt loam and very fine sandy loam. From 35 to 51 inches the texture is gravelly sand and sand ; however , Scio [; ill icam, till substratum from 38 to 61 inches consists of rine sandy loam and gravelly fine sandy 'Department of .Ad i Lure Page' - 4 it Conservation Sarv , ce : 2/7iC4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- c -.-- :Vl.^V Com.ni�il.r'iL = -i-;i DC moi.^;t P' i ii,j iii i l.+ i FOR GcSCRIPT:O?J CATEGORY - GEN Survey Area- tL:7701 COUNTY , %iE�q YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Map Symbol Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------- loam. Permeabiiity in the till substratum phase is moderate in the root zone (surface layer and upper subsoil ) and moderately slow in the underlying layer. In the sandy substratum phase , permeability is moderate in the root zone (surface layer and subsoil ) and rapid in the underlying layer ; however, the water -able rastric -- ware :- movarnent during we - erioas . a c .p or 13 to 24 incnes v"u � ariods , cti- s vaiow _V incnes during dr-y :. t_ n nv a I �. -:ave iiw rr = iic 7 r , :(-1 - 17 I �.,w� ;iatur7, suPPiy of plant nutrients . response of crops to applications of lime and fertilizer is good . The hazard of erosion is siigr�t and slight to moderate on slopes of 2 percent or greater . Scio soils are well suited to all crops coimmon1y grown in the County if adequate measures are used to help control erosion on the steeper slopes and to 'oeiP reduce crusting . Wetness in spring could briefly delay planting and warming of the soi 'i in some places . 77 ..Ha8 . RtlB JQ ' 7 -s•'�.0 a RdB Hao @ HaA � a�`�-ii•� Y~�'3�Ay PIC •�'S � RAB f L '- A P� He f T PaAHa8 pE RdB RdA HaA PmBi .d Pi8 +''cf•) .� V�� •�.. AMP RCB .i'RdOf .'j Ha8 O PmC3 'Hai? Pm B3 HaB •` •Z♦' HaA � •Ma Rd Ha8 HaA 1 HaB A KaA 277 WdA p� [� He RdB CPE -i�tl8 ♦ h Ha8 He HaA Ha8 GR dA `., x, sA RcB �t4a Rd8 OP• R � �`� ROA � � y♦ � ROC �' �st.` R♦ �y .' PIA dB / i7 _0 a Ha8 HaB d'9 / HaA .� •r•' RCB 'PI T � 'Y� ;;•� HaA Cu Rd f •• h y SOA HaA �'. [" - • ROA Yd ar � � ��{' ,� U � aff .4` �.,,_ HaA �y PmC3 Ha6 . HaA e spa tlA '� •Z' y Ijae •{-f Ha8 � ROA '� �q HaB � r. •[•:. :• @a9 �� Rde RdB ..���R9u v < o@ d „� PI CGE s ya rt=/�;� ti a3 s" RAA �� HaA � - � RdI3 HaA O �HaA iY arville\ _ :.�' •� ,: , v� '�' He 6 HaA \ ,.PI x He HaA -1 \\ HaA a9 ROA ,aA RAA �H vola RA s. - H .� . '\ • R 4 s 1Rr m HaA I `Haq Ha / ♦0 '♦* He 8 ><. ?aP Rd6 Gx� @d@ HaA,' ♦ .+' -,6 /1 f s Rdc l He8 F 'HaA ^ l °A ROA a z y HaA ^• ' i RdA Ha SB I n` PIB HaA a• •HaA Ha8 i ROB. �W. f HaB I R Ate@ ,iF OB cys-FYI\ United States Natural Resources Riverhead County Center Department of Conservation Room E-16 Agriculture Service Riverhead , New York 11901 December 7, 1994 Mr. Richard Ward Chairman , Planning Board office D Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 a Southold , IVY 11971 Dear Mr. Ward : I have completed my review of the proposed major subdivision known as Aiiperti Estates . The area designated as open space , lot one on the site plan , is well suited to agricuitura ' production and is by far the best area of the entire parcel for that purpose . The soil within lot one is identified as Haven loam, 0 — 3 percent slopes (HaA) . This soil type is considered prime farm land and is well suited to all crops commonly grown in the county . There is little or no slope within this area thus erosion will not be a problem. The area of most concern is within lots eight through ten . A major gully cuts across these lots causing severe erosion and sedimentation problems . Runoff from the surrounding watershed is depositing large quantities of storm water runoff into Long Island Sound . Storm water runoff has been identified as a major contributor of non point source pollution entering the sound in the Long Island Sound Study . It appears as if the area at the head of the guily was previously excavated three to four feet, creating a depression which is now lower than the surrounding landscape . This may have been done to reduce the volume of runoff entering the gully . In any event, the contour lines depicted on the site plan do not accurately reflect the current situation and should be corrected . The existing gully should also be accurately shown on the site plan because it is limiting the buildable area within lots eight and nine . It is actively eroding and must be stabilizea . Runoff should be diverted away from the gully and deposited into a suitable recharge area capable of handling the peak flow from a 10 year 24 hour storm frequency (5 inch rain in 24 hours) . The side slopes are near vertical and actively eroding . They should be graded to a minimum of one foot horizontal to one foot vertical ( 1 : 1) and stabilized with suitable vegetation . I would recommend that the applicant submit an erosion and sedimentation control pian prior to site plan approval . We could review the adequacy of such a plan upon request . Houses constructed within lots eight through ten should be set back to the extreme south end of each lot or not allowed at all due to the severe erosion of the bluff . Given the Town Trustees current policy on the construction of bulkheads , which states that new bulkheads along the sound are a last resort and are not recommended or encouraged . It would behoove the applicant to set the houses on these lots as far back as possible . Plantings are preferred to stabilize the bluff . If a bulkhead is permitted , it must be covered with sand and maintained , which would be a major expense to the home owner due to the instability of this bluff . Plans for stabilization of the bluff face should also be addressed in the erosion and sedimentation control pian . Hopefully you will find these comments helpful in your deliberations over this project. If you have further questions or need clarification on any item feel free to contact me . S i n c e re I y ,,,�, .A Alien S. Connell District Conservationist O. S. Department of Agripulture • Page — 1 Soil Conservation Service 12/7/94 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- NONTECHNICAL SOILS DESCRIPTION REPORT FOR DESCRIPTION CATEGORY — GEN Survey Area— SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Map Symbol Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HaA 0 TO 2 PERCENT '_,LOPEZ-1 Haven So i I s (HaA, HaB , HaC , He) . ,iaven soils are ceep , well drainea , medium—textured soils that formed in a loamy or silty layer over stratified coarse sand and gravel . The texture from 0 to 19 inches is loam, silt loam, and very fine sandy loam. From 19 to 28 inches the range is silt loam, very fine sandy loam, and gravelly loam, while tha texture from 28 to 55 inches is gravelly sand , loamy sand , sandy loam or stratified sand and gravel . The permeability is moderate in the root zone (surface layer and subsoil ) and rapid or very rapid in the underlying layer. These soils have moderate to high available moisture capacities . Haven soils have low organic matter content and low natural supply of plant nutrients , but crops respond well to lime and fertilizer. When the soils are intensively cultivated the likelihood of crusting is great , however the returning of cover crop residue decreases this problem. Generally , these soils are well suited to crops commonly grown in Suffolk County . HaB HAVEN LOAM, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES Haven Soils (HaA, HaB, HaC, He) . Haven soils are deep , well drained , medium—textured soils that formed in a loamy or silty layer over stratified coarse sand and gravel . The texture from 0 to 19 inches is loam, silt loam, and very fine sandy loam. From 19 to 28 inches the range is silt loam, very fine sandy loam , and gravelly loam, while the texture from 28 to 55 inches is gravelly sand , loamy sand , sandy loam or stratified sand and gravel . The permeability is moderate in the root zone (surface layer and subsoil ) and rapid or very rapid in the underlying layer . These soils have moderate to high available moisture capacities . Haven soils have low organic matter content and low natural supply of plant nutrients , but crops respond well to lime and fertilizer. When the soils are intensively cultivated the likelihood of crusting is great , however the returning of cover crop residue decreases this problem. Generally , these soils are well suited to crops commonly grown in Suffolk County . U.S . Department of Agr• Iture • Page — 2 Soil Conservation Service 12/7/94 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- NONTECHNICAL SOILS DESCRIPTION REPORT FOR DESCRIPTION CATEGORY — GEN Survey Area— SUFFOLK COUNTY , NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Map Symbol Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PIB PLYMOUTH LOAMY SAND, 3 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES Plymouth Soils (PIA, PIB, PIC, PmB3, PsA PsB) Plymouth soils consist of deep , excessively drained , coarse—textured soils that formed in a layer of loamy sand or sand over thick layers of stratified coarse sand and gravel . The texture of Plymouth soils PIA, PIB, PIC, PmB3 and PmC3 from 0 to 27 inches is loamy sand , loamy fine sand , gravelly loamy sand and sand . From 27 to 58 inches the texture is sand and gravel , coarse sand and gravelly coarse sand . The permeability of these soils is rapid . Availab ': e moisture capacity of these soils ranges from low to very low. These soils are droughty during periods of low rainfall . Unless irrigation water is applied , deep rooted crops are better suited . Irrigation water can be applied at a rapid rate but frequent, small applications should be made to reduce the amount lost to downward movement. The organic matter content and natural fertility of these soils is low. Crop response to lime and fertilizer is fair . Maintenance of fertility is difficult because of the sandy texture . Frequent applications of small amounts of fertilizer should be made to reduce nutrient loss by leaching . The sandy surface layer reduces the suitability of these soils for nursery stock . Because of the above limitations , these soils are only fairly well suited to crops commonly grown in Suffolk County . PIC PLYMOUTH LOAMY SAND, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES Plymouth Soils (PIA, PIB, PIC, PmB3, PsA PsB) Plymouth soils consist of deep , excessively drained , coarse—textured soils that formed in a layer of loamy sand or sand over thick layers of stratified coarse sand and gravel . The texture of Plymouth soils PIA, PIB, PIC , PmB3 and PmC3 from 0 to 27 inches is loamy sand , loamy fine sand , gravelly loamy sand and sand . From 27 to 58 inches the texture is sand and gravel , coarse sand and gravelly coarse sand . The permeability of these soils is rapid . Available moisture capacity of these soils ranges from low to very low. These soils are droughty during periods of low rainfall . Unless irrigation water is applied , deep rooted crops are better suited . Irrigation water can be applied at a rapid rate but U .S . Department of Agr� Iture • Page — 3 Soil Conservation Servipe 12:7/94 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- NONTECHNICAL SOILS DESCRIPTION REPORT FOR DESCRIPTION CATEGORY — GEN Survey Area— SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Map Symbol Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------- frequent, small applications should be made to reduce the amount lost to downward movement. The organic matter content and natural fertility of these soils is low . Crop response to lime and fertilizer is fair . Maintenance of fertility is difficult because of the sandy texture . Frequent applications of small amounts of fertilizer should be made to reduce nutrient loss by leaching . The sandy surface layer reduces the suitability of these soils for nursery stock . Because of the above limitations , these soils are only fairly well suited to crops commonly grown in Suffolk County . RdA RIVERHEAD SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 3 PERCENT SLOPES Riverhead Soils (RdA, RdB, RdC) . Riverhead soils are deep , well drained , moderately coarse textured soils that formed in a layer of sandy loam or fine sandy loam over thick layers of coarse sand and gravel . The texture from 0 to 32 inches is sandy loam and fine sandy loam. Sand , loamy sand , gravelly sand and grave ly loamy sand is found at depth of 32 to 65 inches . The permeability is moderately rapid in the root zone (surface layer and subsoil ) and very rapid in the underlaying layer. Riverhead soils have moderate to high available moisture capacities . Natural internal drainage is good , but in many places where these soils have been farmed a plowpan has formed . These soils have low organic matter contents and low natural supply of plant nutrients , but crops respond well to lime and fertilizer. Generally , these soils are well suited to crops commonly grown in Suffolk County . SdA SCIO SILT LOAM, SANDY SUBSTRATUM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES Scio Soils (ScB, SdA , SdB) Scio soils are deep , moderately well drained , medium textured soils that formed in a mantle of very fine sandy loam, loam, or silt loam over coarse sand and gravel or compact glacial till . The texture from 0 to 35 inches is silt loam and very fine sandy loam. From 35 to 51 inches the texture is gravelly sand and sand ; however, Scio silt loam, till substratum from 38 to 61 inches consists of fine sandy loam and gravelly fine sandy U .S . Department of Agr • Iture • Page — 4 Soil Conservation Service 12/7/94 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- NONTECHNICAL SOILS DESCRIPTION REPORT ["nR DESCRIPTION CATEGORY — GEN Survey Area- SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Map Symbol Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------- loam . Permeability in the till substratum phase is moderate in the root zone (surface layer and upper subsoil ) and moderately slow in the underlying layer. In the sandy substratum phase , permeability is moderate in the root zone (surface layer and subsoil ) and rapid in the underlying layer; however , the water table restricts water movement during wet periods . Tne water tao ! e is at a cepth of 18 to 24 inches during wet periods , buT is below 30 inches during dry per ; oos . The a s,Dr have moderate to nigh avai : aDie rno + •�r.+n-e capacity . 'Gcio sous have low organic matter content and low natural supply of plant nutrients . The response of crops to applications of lime and fertilizer is good . The hazard of erosion is slight and slight to moderate on slopes of 2 percent or greater . Scio soils are well suited to all crops commonly grown in the County if adequate measures are used to help control erosion on the steeper slopes and to help reduce crusting . Wetness in spring could briefly delay planting and warming of the soil in some places . C�qv G " iL V i .i r i if y 3fre(1r >- PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman � 4 a Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ' n P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. ui h Southold, New York 11971 �,� „�`. Mark S. McDonald '/ y`',�✓'v Fax (516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards '- Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 15, 1994 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board has reviewed the revised maps dated October 16, 1994, for the above mentioned property. The layout shown on the proposed map is for a total of 10 lots. Nine of the lots are 3 acres in area or slightly larger and the tenth lot is 800,000 square feet in area with a 40,000 square foot building envelope. The proposed layout is not designed as a cluster subdivision, but it is designed with an overall density of five (5) acres. The three sound front lots do not meet all of the requirements for the R-80 Zoning District. However, variances for three similar lots were granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on October 10, 1986. Please find the following in regard to the proposed subdivision: 1 . The Planning Board has some concerns in regard to the location of the building envelopes for the three soundfront lots. Please have your surveyor stake the location of the proposed building envelopes for these lots prior to indicating them on the subdivision map. Upon notification that the envelopes have been staked, the Planning Board will conduct a field inspection to review the proposed locations. If they are found acceptable, they must then be shown on the subdivision map. Aliperti Estates November 15, 1994 Page 2 2. The Planning Board is requiring that the beach area from the toe of the bluff to the mean high water mark be under the ownership of a Homeowners Association. In this manner, the property lines for proposed lots 8, 9 and 10 will end at the toe of the bluff rather than at the mean high water line as proposed. In addition, a common ped4strian accessway to the beach must be designed. The common ownership of the beach area will satisfy the requirement for land to be designated for park and playground purposes. 3. Building envelopes must be shown for Lots 2 - 7. The building envelopes shall not be larger than 40,000 square feet in area. All structures, other than fences must be contained within the building envelope. This restriction must be noted in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. 4. The area outside the building envelope for Lot 1 must be labeled as an Open Space Conservation Easement. All structures, other than fences must be contained within the building envelope. The Planning Board will be forwarding the proposed subdivision to the Soil Conservation Service for review. You will be notified when their report is received. The Planning Board will be requiring that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions be filed pertaining to the Open Space Conservation Easement. You will be notified of the covenants and restrictions required at the time a determination is made on the sketch map. 5. The proposed road must be shown as a separate parcel. This area is to be under the ownership of the Homeowner's Association. Upon receipt of maps revised in accordance with the above, and notification that the building envelopes have been staked, the Planning Board will proceed with the sketch determination and will start the lead agency process for the proposed subdivision. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, i Melissa Spiro ./ Planner PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �. . c Richard G. Ward, Chairman � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. J f r* t; P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald n - Fax(516)765-3136 ! -% -�� Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 15, 1994 Allan Connell USDA-SCS Riverhead County Center Room E-16 1 Center Drive Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Connell: The Planning Board has been reviewing different proposals for the above mentioned site over the past few years. The owner, Mr. Aliperti, recently submitted revised plans as shown on the enclosed map. The Planning Board approved of the general concept and required certain changes as indicated in the enclosed letter dated November 15, 1994. The Planning Board would like your professional opinion in regard to the proposed layout and in regard to the value of this property for agricultural purposes. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Please contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Melissa Spird Planner enc. A10- � 1 SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: 1016/y q SENDER:- �0�4 /"iii'peO-� SUBJECT: AIt�fP(41 SCTMn : RS_ 1 _3 COMMENTS: I f2V�� � fJ1A/11s OCT - 7 1994 L"J sou HOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD UFFO�� Albert J. Krupski, President 6G Town Hall v1 John Holzapfel, Vice President _ a 53095 Main Road/ r5 William G. Albertson y x P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Carrell Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenzel °'` 4r Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Melissa Spiro Planner FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees DATE: March 21, 1994 RE: Aliperti Estates SCTM #1000-95-1-3 After reviewing the file on the above referenced application, it appears that the Trustees would have no jurisdiction on the proposed subdivision. O rifMAR 2 lz ,HOLD TG'NNfNG BOARD PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. �� `' �. �J P. O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald1 'P�Pt N Southold, New York 11971 LJ Kenneth L. Edwards �- Y � Fax(516)765-3136 Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 7line 13, 1994 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: In April of 1994, you met with the Planning Board to discuss Possible design alternatives for subdividing the above mentioned Property. At the end of the meeting it was suggested that you contact the Peconic Land Trust to assist you in developing the property. Subsequent to your meeting with the Planning Board, you contacted me and advised me that you would like the Planning Board to proceed with the review of your proposed five ( 5) lot subdivision as shown on the map last dated June 8, 1993 . The Board has requested that you submit a letter stating that you wish to proceed with the above mentioned plan and that you have withdrawn your original application for a major subdivision of 23 lots, in addition to any alternative plans that you have discussed or submitted since the original application was made. The Planning Board will proceed with review of the proposed subdivision upon receipt of the above mentioned information. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Melissa S�pirj�5" �t'` Planner 4ii \\ffP Oki 1.�oueh oid '��1w yard of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE nOAO 25 SOUTHOLD, L.1., N.V. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 7651809 ACTIOid OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3551 Application Date-1 July 25 , 1986 TO: Nr . Peter Capone , President [Appellant (s) ] Rial Reaity Corporation 20 Audrey Avenue Oyster Cay , WY 11771 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on October 10 , 1986 , the above appeal was .considered , and the action indicated below was taken on your i ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section fXl Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 100- 31 , Bulk Schedule A-80 f ] Request for Application of RIAL REALTY CORP . for Variances to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 100- 31 , Bulk Schedule , for approval of insufficient lot width of three proposed parcels in this pending minor subdivision located at the northerly end of proposed right-of-way extending from the north side of Oregon Road , Mattituck , NY ; County Tax Map Parcel No . 1000- 95- 1 -3. Containing 47 . 0520 acres total . WHEREAS , a public hearing was held and concluded on September 11 , 1986 in the Matter of the Application of RIAL REALTY CORP . under Appeal No . 3551 ; and WHEREAS , at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded ; and WHEREAS , the board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application ; and WHEREAS , the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question , its present zoning , and the surrounding areas ; and WHEREAS , the board made the following findings of fact : 1 . The premises in question is a described parcel containing a total acreage of 47 . 0520 , located along the (north )west side of Oregon Road , Mattituck , with a frontage ( lot width ) of 536 . 58 feet , and is more particularly shown on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000 , Section . 95 , Block 1 , Lot 3. 2 . The subject premises is improved at the most southerly end with a single- family 21-story frame dwelling , and four cces- sory buildings located in the rear yard area . 3 . By this application , appellant requests approval of the proposed insufficient lot width of Lots #1 and #2 of ' 1I150 feet and of Lot #3 of 169 feet . The proposed lots will cantai a minimum lot area of 94 , 770 sq . ft . , all as shown by minor subdivision map dated January 30 , 1986 , revised March 20 , 1986 , prepared by Peconic Surveyors and Engineers , P . C . DATED: October 10 , 1986 . CIiAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN (ZONING BOARD Form ZB4OF APPEALS (rev. 12181) Rage 2 - Appeal JOAO • _ ;— Matter of RIAL REALTY CORP . Decision Rendered October• 10 , 1986 4. Article III , Section 100-31 , Bulk Schedule , Column "A-80" of the Zoning Code requires a minimum lot width of 175 feet . The percentage of relief requested in relation to this requirement is 15% for proposed Lots 1 and 2 , and seven percent for proposed Lot #3 . In considering this appeal , the board also finds and determines : (a ) the character of the land and circumstances are unique ; (b ) the variance will not in turn cause a substantial effect of increased population density or be adverse to the safety , health , welfare , comfort , convenience and order of the town ; (c ) the practical difficulties are sufficient ; (d ) there will be no substantial detriment to adjoining properties ; (e ) the difficulty cannot be obviated by some method feasible for appel - lant to pursue other than a variance ; (f) the relief requested is not substantial ; (9 ) that in view of the above factors , the interests of justice will best be served by granting the variance , as noted below. Accordingly , on motion by Mr . Sawicki , seconded by Mr . Dougiass , . it was RESOLVED , that the relief requested under Appeal No . 3551 in the Matter of the Application of RIAL REALTY CORPORATION of insufficient lot width of 150 feet for Lots #3 and #2 , and 163 feet for Lot #1 , BE AND •HEREBY IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1 . No disturbance of land within the 50- ft . distance shown along the 49 . 5 ' contour line of proposed Lot #1 ; 2 . The dimensions of the lots shall be as shown by minor subdivision map lastly revised July 21 , 1986 ; no lot- line changes shall be permitted . Vote of the Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Grigonis , Douglass and Sawicki . (Member Doyen of Fishers Island was absent . ) This reoslution was duly adopted . 1 k ,KFC/�-�/�ic i GERARD P . GOEH NGER , �1iFlIRMAN October 13 , 7986 in �gtlttlMc IDDRr . � 26v4 T ��I. ��'Q,.ara✓ �jc11'�7r' $CtAF1L( �s1e> 2x1-xieB B. ANTHONY ALIPERTI I.iccnsed Real Estate Broker'' Tv 701 ,44 ` Ur �v I� I 1 p l (� R0w ILLL APR 1 5 1994 1138 William Floyd Parkway • Box 149 • Shirley, New York 11 7 �NIING BOARD sz( Albert J. Krupski,President �O�OSUFFO(�COGy Town Hall John Holzaptel, Vice President 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson C4 x P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Garrell O .tC Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel yzlJ� a0� Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Melissa Spiro Planner FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees DATE: March 21, 1994 RE: Aliperti Estates SCTM #1000-95-1-3 After reviewing the file on the above referenced application, it appears that the Trustees would have no jurisdiction on the proposed subdivision. CJ K 2 1 1994DHOLD TOWNING BOARD Albert J. Krupski, President Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President -Z� y` 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson P.O. Box 1179 vy- • Southold, New York 11971 Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel 'y?JO! �.DO� Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Melissa Spiro Planner FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees DATE: January 31, 1994 RE: Aliperti Estates SCTM #1000-95-1-3 We have no problem with decrease of density on the sketch plan. However, we would like to see the Coastal Erosion Hazard line superimposed on the survey and the Building envelope placed landward of it. FEB O�,UfF0F 14, G cz PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y " SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman b CIf P� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. A''�Q,( .� Richard G. Warder Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: John Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees FROM: Melissa Spiro k; Planner DATE: June 29, 1993 RE: Sketch Plan for Aliperti Estates N/s Oregon Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Attached please find a copy of the revised sketch plan dated June 8, 1993 for the above mentioned subdivision. In 1992 both the Trustees and Bruce Anderson reviewed a yield map for a proposed 21 lot subdivision of this property. The applicant has since revised his proposal to a 5 lot subdivision as shown on the attached map. Please review the attached map in regard to the Coastal Erosion Hazard line. Encl. S�tp31=iC� PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.0* '�'� P.O. Box 909 54655 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 516-765-5020 FAX 516-765-1797 John T.Metzger,L.S. June 8 , 1993 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road / Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re : Aliperti Estates 1000-95-01 -03 To whom it may concern: Attached you will find eight revised survey maps of the above captioned subdivision for resubmission. Please contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Jo i T. Metzger, V JTM/'Las Att . I JUN 8IM s L SOUTliOLD PLANNING 8OA11) • %W,'Ll.y ; • C PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS � , SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ,y' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �j s Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 17 , 1993 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Majox Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: On May 7 , 1993 , the Planning Board received eight revised maps of the above mentioned proposed subdivision from John Metzger. The maps were revised in accordance with only Number 5 of the Planning Board' s letter of April 9, 1993 . The additional items requested in the April 9th letter were not indicated on the map. I have enclosed an additional copy of the letter for your convenience. The Planning Board will proceed with their review of the subdivision upon receipt of completely revised maps. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, &.d gf Richard G. Ward *5 Chairman Encl. WECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. P.O. Box 909 54655 Main Road 5 Southold, N.Y. 11971 516-765-5020 FAX 516-765-1797 John T.Metzger,L.S. May 6 , 1993 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road / Box 1179 Southold , NY 11971 Re :: Aliperti Estates 1000-95-01-03 To whom it may concern: Attached you will find eight survey maps of the above captioned subdivision for re-submission. Please contact me if you require any additional information . Sincerely, t Jo� T. Metzger , L .S. �u5 { JTM/tas Att. 00 P!�?`NTNG Sue 'D OVa F011r' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS .r �� T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �.ji ® `� Supervisor `D® George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 9 , 1993 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board has reviewed the revised five ( 5) lot subdivision proposal for the above mentioned property. Please note the following: 1. The area of the beach and the area of the bluff must be indicated for each sound front lot. Each lot must be 80,000 square feet excluding the unbuildable bluff and beach area. 2. The area of the accessway for each flag lot must be indicated. Each lot must be 80,000 square feet in area excluding the accessway, the beach and the bluff areas. 3 . The Coastal Erosion Hazard line must be indicated. All building envelopes must be placed landward of this boundary. 4 . The proposed deck and steps to the Sound must be approved by the Board of Trustees. Until such time that you have received approval for these structures, they should not be indicated on the proposed subdivision plats. 5. A right-of-way fifty ( 50) feet in width, must be located at the northern end of the property for future road purposes. SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM# : COMMENTS: / = b t x MS SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER Iz-I i � 42 SENDER: SUBJECT: A1;�P2�, �SI4�oS SCTM# : qs - 1 _ 3 COMMENTS: __.v.7C U SS P C I'z-Ifyl92 W�a?T�N� �$ CY�SCV55 W(`� 1 IQv.n.�� �O^.rd • �phi[� MS APPEALS B CARD MEMBERS =a0 OGy� SCOS L.HARRIS Pe Gerard P.Goehringer, Chairman N x Serge Doyen,Jr. p Town Hall, 53095 Main Road James Dinizio,Jr. 'yj�O apt P.O. Box 1179 Robert A.Villa 1 * Southold, New York 11971 Richard C.Wilton Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS Telephone (516) 765-1800 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO : Bennett Orlowski , Jr . , Chairman , Planning Board FROM : Jerry Goehringer , Chairman , Z . B . A. DATE : December 31 , 1992 SUBJECT : Your Memo/Inquiry of December 16th (dated Dec . 11 ) Rial Realty - Appeal No . 3551 This memorandum is in response to your inquiry concerning the validity of a Z . B. A. variance rendered in 1986 . The lot width of each Lots #1 , #2 and #3 are drawn appropriately on the major subdivision map revised December 2 , 1992 , in accordance with the ZBA' s determination . Since ZBA determinations run with the land and there has been no adverse change in the configuration of the three lots under the lot width variance , the variance remains and a new applica- tion is not required . The change from a minor to a major has no effect on this particular appeal . SUut}i ;u P1gHn�,�U, G� .0 'A PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Jn. i SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman >, '. .;;r Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. ��,( Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 '1.0: Gerard P. Goehringer Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman RE: ZBA Decision for Rial Realty Corp. Appeal No. 3551 Decision Rendered October 10, 1986 SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 DATE: December 11, 1992 In 1986 RIAL Realty had a pending four lot subdivision application before the- Planning Board for the above mentioned parcel. RIAL Realty was also before the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance for approval of insufficient lot width of three of the proposed parcels in the pending four lot minor subdivision. The variance was granted on October 10, 1986 subject to the following two conditions: 1. No disturbance of land within the 50-ft. distance shown along the 49. 5' contour line of proposed Lot #1; 2 . The dimensions of the lots shall be as shown by minor subdivision map lastly revised July 21, 1986; no lot-line changes shall be permitted. The Planning Board approved the sketch map on November 10, 1986. The applicant never submitted maps with approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and therefore final subdivision approval was never granted. The entire property was eventually sold to Mr. Aliperti. Mr. Aliperti currently has an application before the Planning Board for a major subdivision. In this proposal there are three sound front lots. These three lots are similar to, though not exactly the same as, the three lots involved in the variance application. The Planning Board questions whether or not the variance granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals for the proposed minor subdivision, which never received final approval, is valid for the proposed major subdivision. I have enclosed a copy of the 1986 ZBA decision, a copy of the map for the minor subdivision proposal that did not receive Planning Board approval and a copy of the map dated Dec. 3, 1992 , for the major subdivision proposal that is currently before the Planning Board. Encl. acs SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: , 4 SUBJECT; SCTM## : 9S 3 COMMENTS: ( 11 p MQp fF U�SP Gl �v S lro w i b /04 CX . . �' 4 1992 ��93UFFOtIr o PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS W ,? SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. ��O Richard G. Ward ;y� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 28, 1992 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Vineyard View Estates (Aliperti Estates) SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board has reviewed the Yield Map dated April 15, 1992 for the above mentioned subdivision. As you know, the Board was holding review until the Board of Trustees had a chance to review the site in accordance with the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area designation. A few changes must be made in order for the map to be acceptable for purposes of determining the yield for the site. 1 . As per Section A106-32 F. of the Town Code, subdivisions containing twenty lots or more must have at least two street connections with existing public streets. Due to the configuration of the subject property, it is not feasible to design two connections with Oregon Road. However, the Planning Board has required that the layout for the proposed subdivision contain a 50 foot east/west tap street at the northern end of the property to allow for additional connections in the future. Such tap street must be indicated on the Yield Map. 2. All proposed lots must meet the minimum requirements of the Bulk Schedule for Residential Districts. Lots 19 and 21 do not meet the minimum width requirements. The drainage calculations were computed using a 5" rainfall, rather than a 6" rainfall as required by Code. While the amount of land shown for drainage purposes has been accepted by the Engineering Inspector for yield purposes, please notify your engineer that future drainage computations must be done using a 6" rainfall. Upon submission of revised Yield maps, the Planning Board will initiate the coordinated environmental review in accordance with the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The Planning Board will review the proposed cluster design after the yield map is accepted. Please be aware that upon receipt of an acceptable Yield Map, the Planning Board will be forwarding the Long Environmental Assessment Form to their consultant for review. There is a $400. 00 fee for this review. You will be required to submit full payment prior to the Planning Board authorizing the consultant to proceed with his review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, �C3L!��C?-«i-c JCLi Bennett Orlowski, Jr:� Chairman ' Pb tLe TRUSTEES O��gUFFO(�co ' MZ SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, I11, President h� Dy SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President o Henry P. Smith Town Hall John B. Tuthill `'F 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson y'�O( # ��O PO. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TORN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Planning Board _ I FROM: Southold Town Trust e WL RE: Alperties Estates SCT D TCTa;VN PI , TARD DATE: July 23, 1992 The Southold Town Trustees visited the site of the above referenced proposed subdivisions today. In addition to the comments of the previously approved Bruce Anderson report, we have re-visited this site to check for Coastal Erosion Hazard Act compliance and address our mutual concerns: 1 ) The Trustees affirm our previous approval of Mr. Andersons report of 5/10/92 which calls for greater building setbacks and a common access to the sound on Lots 20 & 21. 2) The Coastal Erosion Hazard Act of Southold Town, by definition, describes the entirety of lots 19, 20, & 21 as being part of the bluff. This fact, coupled with our concerns surrounding the bluffs' stability and similar concerns in Mr. Andersons report as seen on field inspection, clearly support the idea that building setbacks of 100 ' are not sufficient for this site and these lots. 3 ) In fact, the jurisdictional map line for the "Building Hazard Area" under the jurisdiction of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Ordinance approximates the 56 ' contour of elevation on Lot #21 and would render nearly half of that building envelope unbuildable under this ordinance. The hazard area line probably transects the northeast corner of Lot #20. These regulatory features, combined with the likely continued avulsion and displacement of soils in the ravine area and on the conventional bluff face, make any building placement seaward of the 56 ' contour imprudent if not impermissible by stature. 4) The ravine on this site should be considered as a possible asset in that it could be maintained as a natural feature as well as legally improved into an access road for increased public access to Long Island Sound. The road drainage and slope stabilization attendant with a road in this location would decrease the erosion potential for this site and might justify planning homes between the 56 ' and 70' contours on Lot 20 & 21. 5) A licensed land surveyor should place the coastal erosion line on the yield or proposed cluster plan. No building envelopes can be seaward of this line. 6) Serious consideration should be given to preserve lots 19, 20, & 21 as open space with the road layout such that the ravine could be minimally improved/stabilized as common beach entry by foot for subdivision residents and be kept "on the back burner" for future road development by the road owners/the Town. 7) All development scenarios should include a soil stabilization and vegetation plan for lots 19, 20 & 21 with details on routing surface runoff water into subsurface disposal as close as practical to its, origin and not permit any drainage on slopes toward the Sound. 8) If the applicant insists on construction on Lots 20 & 21, open space in the upland should be dedicated by restrictive covenant and required to be held available for future selective retreat - or, Lots 20 & 21 should be deepened another 200' so as to entirely encompass all land up to the 70' contour. In closing, the Trustees wish to thank you for your referral in this matter. Attachment (Anderson report of 5/10/92) _ LONG I S LAN D SOUND line 451. 55 �MHNIM 0 42' 10" __— _ 5� �-� N. 59��� BotiO/So- N 9.4 — 7 %7 1 — o i O /,are / // / m 3 1 5 c � �7 nl 1 b 62 - - 44, /r✓ 95 /,nc 6 � 8 MTr (,c 1 / 5 l5 t •!% Iri7 c 6 0 00 16i�9 i 60— -00 62 ( , 5a o - A-ofnc tj o - / '5° / C S 58 i /G 3'r 64 60 -11 0 - i 62 r ��66 19 2'/wi.:5i, �\ 9 g 6 J/�3 70 / //5 jzc 25 6N' 3e h —70 6 S 60 64 U � \ A — 64 1 - .. M ry TOTAL AREA = 47. 0520 ACRES NOTE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE 25 ' R.O.W. 25 k'.c, W. IS 'To P,E WPa( V (_C) Tc 0' µ/(DTH ZOAIIA16 0i5TelCT ' A6IZ '2E�' DC_u-rir.t I Lo ; A /ZEA ` Cc�MP�'rf-C> To -r.,_,.� c: r' ?,c. .rrr ELEVATIONS AND CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO MEAN SEA LEVEL REVISION JUNE 2 /ZOAO REViSEp M4a 2 .i vsam d, , R0 `rs i PROPOSED MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR RIAL REALTY CORPORATION AT MATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY N. Y. 1000 - 095 - 01 - 03 SCALE 1" = 100 ' OCT. 19 , 1985 JAN. 30, 19 86 SAND SG9 2y j.MET? L� • ` �� T N.Y.S. LIC. NO 49618 NE, PECONfC YORS d ENGINEERS P. C. i (516 ) 765 - 5020 t P. O. Box 909 - MAIN ROAD 31ON JUNE 20, 1986 SOUTHOLD , N. Y. 11971 Rl ISEO MA2 20 i98C - v 2i, i98G 85 - 185 A Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant TOWN OF SO UTNOLD May 10 , 1992 John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall P. 0. Box 1179 [ i , Southold, NY 11971 € Re: 92 Proposed Subdivision - Aliperties Estates X19 SCTM # 1000-95-01-03 Dear Mr.Bredemeyer, - A field inspection was conducted on the above referenced parcel on May 10, 1992 . The following is a description of the site and recommendations. Description The survey of the parcel repared by Peconic Surveyors dated March 12 , 1992 ("Survey"� shows the parcel in two sections . Section 1 extends from Oregon Road approximately 2844 feet northwest towards the Long Island Sound. Section 2 continues northwest approximately 1347 feet to the mean high water mark at the Long Island Sound ("Sound") . Section 1 is actively being farmed at this time. It is apparent that most of the lands within Section 2 were recently cleared as the predominant vegetation is early successional. The most striking feature of this parcel is the bluff itself. The bluff facing the Sound is for the most part unvegetated, very steep and therefore highly unstable. The Survey correctly indicates an eroded area on the eastern portion of Lot #21 , which now must be considered part of the bluff (see attached map) . Additionally , there is a ravine which extends from the bluff approximately 150 feet in a southerly direction which is in close proximity to the eastern property boundary of subject parcel. This ravine appears to be on the parcel identified on the Survey as now or formally Soundview Acres. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Recommendations The two parcels fronting the Long Island Sound should be of greatest concern to the Board of Trustees . Specifically , the bluff contained therein is highly unstable and will most likely continue to undergo substantial erosion. Consequently the top of the bluff will move in a southerly direction and may straighten out over time. Generally , the 100 foot setback from the bluff has been a standard recommended setback from the bluffs along the Long Island Sound. However , the marked instability of the bluff tya found on this parcel justifies a greater setback from the bluff than currently proposed. Slopes found in the ravine area appear to be somewhat more stable than the bluff face itself . The building envelop for Lot #21 should be placed at least 100 feet from the off site ravine. Future homes built on the two lots facing the Sound will experience a loss of property over time due to erosion of the bluff face. Accordingly, these future home owners may propose a structural fortification of the shoreline such as bulkheads , seawalls and the like. The fortification of the shoreline will prove to be difficult from a regulatory point of view, and very expensive to construct. However, greater setbacks from the bluff will largely prevent these future difficulties. It is recommended that a two hundred foot building setback from the top bluff be required in this subdivision. Additionally, the denuded areas within two hundred feet of the top of the bluff should be vegetated, preferably with indigenous plants . Future home owners of the two lots facing the Sound will likely want access to the beaches below the bluff. This will necessitate the construction of a large stairway on top of the face of the bluff. The construction of a stairway will likely cause acute and accelerated erosion of the bluff face. Given the adjacency of the two lots , a single access serving both lots should be considered. Consolidation of access would preclude the necessity of building two stair ways to the beach thus mitigating potential future impacts to the bluff. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 The Southold Planning Board should be encouraged to pursue a consolidated access point to the beach through the use of a easement placed on the common boundary of both lots . Further, the developer of this parcel should be encouraged to construct this access to the beach as to avoid any access conflicts between the future homeowners of these parcels. Sincerely, Ooe� 000 Bruce Anderson I I i 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 z �2, � G �� V G J N/O/F SOUNDV/EW ACRES 1264.50 1 i F a \ \ 5.4 5. 59 3 / 297.24' \ 347.82 r\3 >v J Q) r N b /o/ 000 t u o \ icC en / %i pi ya . v 9 rye rb ! i 2dt \\ 20 u 1 g0000 srj\t3 _eqo�� sf. rt7 / 5(c y jd9. cwc/ope ` \ 043.61 ` � I298.24' \ \ \ 31' 40. 40"W. � ss � p N/O/F ROSE H. BAER P&NIC SURVEYORS, P.C. � - P.O. Box 909 54655 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 516-765-5020 FAX 516-765-1797 John T. Metzger,L.S. May 11 , 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road / Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Aliperti Estates 1000-95-01 -03 To whom it may concern: Attached please find sketch plan and Yield Plan maps of the above captioned subdivision for your approval . Please feel free to contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, ?ohn T.' Metzier MAY 12 JTM/tas Att . $OUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD h�o��SpFFO(�-coGy� o r._ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS w f_. = SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman of .- �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. O �a Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward P.O. Boz 11 Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New Yorkk 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 30, 1992 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Vineyard View Estates (Aliperti Estates) SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board has reviewed the Yield Maps dated March 12, 1992, that were received by this office on March 20 , 1992 . The maps are not acceptable due to the fact that the design does not include land for drainage purposes. Please have your surveyor correct the maps and resubmit them for the Board' s review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, B�n �tiettOr �i, Jr-.', ;yam Chairman r� o��gUFFO(,�co �� ay C2 f. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS W SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Ef �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. O Richard G. Ward ©� �a Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: John Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman DATE: March 26, 1992 RE: Yield Map for Aliperti Estates N/s Oregon Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Attached please find a copy of the Yield Map dated March 12, 1992, for the above mentioned subdivision for your review. This map is to be used for density purposes only. The Board will be requiring that the lots be clustered on the Sketch Map. Please contact Melissa Spiro of this office if you have any questions regarding the above. PPONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. P.O. Box 909 -� 54655 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 516-765-5020 FAX 516-765-1797 John T.Metzger,L.S. March 18 , 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Aliperti Estates 1000-95-01 -03 To whom it may concern, Enclosed you will find revised Yield Plan for Aliperti Estates. Please feel free to contact me if you require any additional information. Thank you. Sincerely, Jd n T. Metzgl L. S. JTM/tas enclosure 0 Gun ; ,�; JININARD ;ice -FO PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman `. �'� _. ,S ^` Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �t Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald - `- P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 16, 1992 B. Anthony Aliperti 1138 William Floyd Parkway Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Vineyard View Estates ( Aliperti Estates) SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board has .reviewed your letter of December 18, 1991, in regard to proceeding with the above mentioned subdivision application. The last activity pertaining to this application is a February 14, 1990 letter addressed to you from the Planning Board. In this letter, a revised yield map and a revised cluster map were requested. To this day, the revised yield map has not been received. The Board is not in a position to proceed with review of a cluster layout until a revised yield map is submitted and accepted. The following information must be shown on the yield map: 1 . The top of the bluff line and the one-hundred ( 100) foot building setback must be indicated. The map last dated November 11, 1989, indicates the bluff line, however, the one-hundred foot building setback does not accurately follow such line. 2. All lots must be in conformance with the minimum bulk schedule requirements for lot width and lot depth, as stated in the Town Code. 3 . Building envelopes, in conformance with the minimum bulk schedule requirements, must be shown for all sound front lots. 4 . The map must reflect the property change created by the approved set-off of ACMT. 5. It is no longer a requirement to show land for park and playground purposes on the yield map. As per Section A106-38 (E) of the Town Code, a park and playground fee of two thousand dollars ( $2,000. ) per lot will be required. Therefore, it is not necessary to show land for park and playground purposes on the yield map. I have enclosed a copy of the application materials for a major subdivision in order for you to update your files in regard to the Board' s current requirements. In addition, please note that the Planning Board will be referring the Long Environmental Assessment Form to their Environmental Consultant for review. The Board has received a cost estimate of $400. 00 from the consultant for such review. You must submit this payment before the Planning Board will authorize the consultant to proceed with his review, and before the Board will make a determination of whether the project will have a significant environmental impact. Upon receipt of six copies of a revised yield map containing the information listed above, the Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Sys Chairman enc. A 94X�C�82614 4WBFiGL B. ANTHONY ALIPERTI Licensed Real Estate Broker 516-281-2646 December 18 , 1991 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold , NY 11971 RE : ACMT/Vineyard state/Aliperti Estate Oregon Road SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr . Orlowski and Members of the Board : At this time , we would like to reopen the preliminary application on the above major subdivision . There have been changes made concerning this parcel as you are aware . It would be greatly appreciated if you would advise us as to the impact this change will have on the application. Also , please attach any information you may need concerning this application . Thank you for your time and assistance . If you have any questions , please call . Have a happy holiday season . Sincerely , —7 B . Anthony AlipertiVt Owner ns/BAA wouZI pR 1138 William Floyd Parkway • Box 149 • Shirley, New York 11967 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road m SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 ` v. r'-•.'l�;;yra.� �"� Supervisor Southold, New York '�" '• - ^�F_ Fax (516) 765-1823 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 14, 1990 Anthony Aliperti P.O. Box 149 Shirley, New York 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Vineyard View Estates (Aliperti Estates) SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board reviewed the most recent submission for the above mentioned subdivision. The following item refers to the YIELD MAP. 1. A one-hundred ( 100) foot setback from the bluff must be shown on the map. All lots must be outside of the bluff line. Lots numbered 21 and 22 are not acceptable as shown. The lots must be 80,000 square feet in area excluding the unbuildable bluff area. As r per Section 100-181C (1) of the Town Code, the standard subdivision shall conform to all requirements of the Zoning Code and Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold. Buildable land, as defined in Section 100-13 of the Town Code, is the net area of a lot or parcel after deducting wetlands, streams, ponds, slopes over fifteen percent ( 15%) , underwater land, easements or other restrictions preventing use of such land for construction of buildings or development. The following items refer to the CLUSTER PLAN: 1. The density of the sketch cluster plan must reflect that allowable by the yield map. 2 . As discussed at the February 13 , 1990 Planning Board meeting, if you wish that Lot No. 1 be larger than 40,000 square feet, you must proceed first with a set Off ofmthat lot. The set Off must be shown on the yield3 . The frontage for the sound lots must be at least one hundred and twenty-five (125) feet, not one hundred and fifteen feet as shown. 4. To avoid the potential of creating a straight road which may be used as a "raceway" , the Board requests that additional curves be added to the proposed road. Upon receipt of revised maps reflecting the changes noted above, the Board will proceed with their review, and will begin the State Environmental Quality Review process. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman ms f VEL CONSTRUCTION CORP. 1138 William Floyd Parkway Shirley, New York 11967 (516) 281-2646 November 3, 1989 Southold Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Re: Pcoposed Major Subidvision Vineyard View Estates (Aliperti Estates) SCTM # 100-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Orlowski : In response to your comments of October 10, 1989 referring to the Yield Map with regard to the above matter, please be advised as follows ; It would appear that pursuant to Section 100-136 A. ( 1 ) of the code of the Town of Southold, the property located in the bluff area is permitted for the purpose of determining lot yyield. . . "in computing the maximum number of lots that may be created, any lands which are subject to flooding or which ace occupied by public utility easement in such a manner as to prevent their use and development shall not be considered part of the total gross area. In response to your comment regarding the Cluster Plan, please be advised as follows ; As to item 1 it is cepsectfully requested that the lot area remain at 40, 000 square feet. This request is motivated by the fact that the area is completely open and without trees. The 40, 000 square foot lots would permit sufficient plantings of indigenous trees and shrubs that would eventually establish substantial buffering between the lots. As to item 2 ; please note revised Yield Map. As to item 3; please refer to revised Yield Map which demonstrates that the lots will in fact terminate at the bottom of the bluff, and that the beach area will be contained in the open space area of the subdivision. As to item 4; Section 100-136 A. ( 2) states that in a cluster development, lot area, width, depth, front yard, rear yard and side yards shall not be reduced by more than fifty percent (50% ) of the minimum requirements set forth in the "Bulk and Parking Schedule" . Accordingly, unless I am mistaken, a plan front of 115 + or - is permissable. As to item 5 ; The revised map will show removal of deck, bulkhead, stairs and filled area. The applicant will make independent application for permits and submit the same to the Planning Board upon the same being approved. VecY t Y rs, ` ANTHONY ALIPERTI AP:lc J Ln Town Hall. 53095 Main Road p 4 P.O. Box 1179 0� Southold. New York 11971 �l TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 10, 1989 Anthony Aliperti P.O. Box 149 Shirley, N.Y. 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Vineyard View Estates (Aliperti Estates) SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board reviewed the most recent submission for the above mentioned proposal. The following revisions must be addressed before the Board can proceed with their review of the proposal. The following item refers to the YIELD MAP. A one-hundred ( 100) foot setback from the bluff must be shown on the map. All lots must be outside of the bluff line. Lots numbered 21 and 22 are not acceptable as shown. The lots must be 80, 000 square feet in area excluding the unbuildable bluff area. The following items refer to the CLUSTER PLAN. 1. The density of the sketch plan must reflect that allowable by the yield map. The Board requests that all lots be reduced to 30, 000 square feet in area. 2. The Planning Board can not grant approval of a large lot such as Lot #1 under the Cluster Ordinance. If the intent is to keep the large lot, the lot must first be set off, and the yield for the cluster must be determined with the exclusion of the area of the lot to be set off. 3 . The lot lines for the soundfront lots must terminate at the bottom of the bluff. The beach area should be contained in the open space area for the subdivision. 4. The frontage for the sound lots must be at least one hundred and twenty-five (125) feet, not one hundred and fifteen as shown. 5. The proposals for the wood deck, the bulkhead, the stairs, and the filled area should not be shown on the map unless the appropriate permits have been granted. If permits for the work have been granted, copies of such should be submitted to the Planning Board' s office. Upon receipt of revised maps reflecting that mentioned above, the Board will proceed with their review, and will begin the State Environmental Quality Review process. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. �ry truly yQuYs ,� 7 'O , l j/� 'Bernnett Orlowski,'- r. ' Chairman 1989 ' J4U f0 11 -�.• SUBMISSIONS WITHOUT COVER LETTERS SUBJECT: v! Lk-o SCTM #1000- SENDER: � :Pei+, _ T- q- map PHONE NUMBER: 12 ,1 Town Hall. 53095 Main Road 0 P.O. Box 1179 �l Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 22, 1989 Anthony Aliperti P.O. Box 149 Shirley, N.E. 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Vineyard View Estates (Aliperti Estates) SCTM# 41000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board reviewed the sketch plan dated March 3, 1989. Many of the items requested in the Planning Board's February 24, 1989 correspondence were not addressed. Below please find a list of the missing items. The following items refer to the YIELD MAP, which was requested in the February correspondence, but was not submitted. 1 . The park and drainage areas must be delineated separately, and calculations shown, as specified in the Subdivision Regulations (Chapter A106) and the Highway Specifications (Chapter A108) of the Southold Town Code. 2 . An east-west access at the northern end of the property must be shown on the map. 3 . A one-hundred ( l 00) foot setback from the bluff must be shown on the map. The following items refer to the CLUSTER PLAN: 1 The density of the sketch plan must reflect that allowable by the yield map. As a proper yield map has not been submitted, the allowable density for the cluster map can not be determined. 2. As mentioned above, an east-west access must be provided at the northern end of the property. This access should be located so that it can provide access to the soundfront lots as well. 3. The Planning Board has reviewed the location of the tap roads and is in favor of eliminating the southern most tap road. 4. The Planning Board can not grant a large lot such as Lot #1 (previously Lot #2) under the Cluster Ordinance. If the intent is to keep the large lot, the lot must first be set off, and the yield for the cluster must be determined with the exclusion of the area of the lot to be set off. 5. A one-hundred ( 100) foot setback from the edge of the bluff must be shown on the map. 4uilding envelopes for the soundfront lots must be located outside the one-hundred foot setback. 6 . The lot lines for the soundfront lots must terminate at the bottom of the bluff. The beach area should be contained in the open space area for the subdivision. 7 . The frontage for the sound lots should be at least one hundred and twenty-five (125) feet, not one hundred and fifteen as shown. 8. A single access point to the beach area should be shown on the map to provide a common access point to the beach area for all lots. Upon receipt of revised maps reflecting that mentioned above, the Board will proceed with their review, and will begin the State Environmental Quality Review process. Z-e- Al ery tr ly o r /+t L41 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN ms l T Town Hall, 53095 Main Road �✓, w ' . P.O. Box 1 179 4 . Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (5 16) 7651938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 24, 1989 Anthony Aliperti P.O. Box 149 Shirley, NY 11967 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision for Aliperti Estates SCTM#1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board reviewed the yield map dated October 9, 1988 , and the sketch plan dated Aug. 8, 1987 , and had the following comments. 1 . YIELD MAP: Park and drainage areas must be delineated separately and calculations shown as specified in Subdivision Regulations (Chapter A106) and Highway Specifications (Chapter A108) of the Southold Town Code. An east-west access at the northern end of the property must be shown on the map. Additional tap roads to the adjacent property must also be shown. Note that no cul-de-sac is to be greater than 800 feet in length. (This will be further described below) . 2 . CLUSTER PLAN The yield map shows 21 lots and the sketch plan shows 23 lots. The density of the sketch plan must reflect that allowable by the yield map. As mentioned above, an east-west access must be provided at the northern end of the property. This access should be located so that it can provide access to the soundfront lots as well. Tap roads should be located to provide access to the adjacent property. These tap roads would be in addition to the east-west access mentioned above. The tap roads must be located so that no cul-de-sac. is greater than 800 feet in length. The tap roads are necessary, as subdivisions containing morethan twenty ( 20) lots must provide more than one access point. The Planning Board is not in favor of the location of Lot #1. All lots should be clustered to the northern end of the property. The Planning Board can not grant a large lot such as Lot #2 under the Cluster Ordinance. If the intent is to keep the large lot, the lot must first be set off , and the yield for the cluster must be determined with the exclusion of the area of the lot to be set off. A one hundred ( 100) foot setback from the bluff must be shown on both the yield map and the cluster map. All building envelopes must be outside this setback. The property lines for the soundfront lots should end at the bluff line. A common point for all lots should allow a single access point to the beach area. Upon receipt of revised maps reflecting that mentioned above, the Board will proceed with their review, and will begin the State Environmental Quality Review process. Please contact the office if you have any further questions. Very truly-' -'urs" BENNETT OR/L�OWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN r FFA 0 in m Town Hall, 53095 Main Road y0 • P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 20, 1988 Anthony Aliperti P.O. Box 149 Shirley, NY 11967 RE: Proposed major subdivision for Aliperti Estates SCTM# 1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board reviewed the most recent submission which was received on October 19 , 1988. The Board requests a proper yield map, showing the location of areas for drainage and park and playground, before they proceed with their review. As stated previously, these areas are not to be used in the determination of the yield of the parcel. An application and application fee must also be submitted before the Board can proceed with their review. Upon submission of the application, application fee, and yield map, the Board will proceed with their review of the cluster layout. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very trulphours r BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR CHAIRMAN ms Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Lin P.O. Box 1179 "p Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 7, 1988 Anthony Aliperti P.O. Box 149 Shirley, NY 11967 RE: Aliperti Estates SCTM #1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr. Aliperti: The Planning Board reviewed the above proposed subdivision and has the following comments: The yield map must show the location of areas for drainage and park & playground. These areas can not be used in the determination of the number of lots. As for the sketch plan for the cluster subdivision, all lots adjacent to the Sound must be located above the bluff line and be designed so as to have frontage as per the Town code. This could be achieved most likely by locating 3 lots adjacent to the Sound, with the additional common access to the Sound which is shown on the current map. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. - Vepy - - ruly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI ,JR. CHAIRMAN it P TO' D SL 1 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July 14, 1988 Anthony Aliperti P.O. Box 149 Shirley, NY 11967 RE: Aliperti Estates SCTM #1000-95-1-3 Dear Mr . Aliperti: The Planning Board has reviewed the above mentioned subdivsion. Before the Board can proceed with their review, they would like to see a yield map of the property. if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Ver truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN jt ENE, ' ....9 ,,...,,A ^......e.^ ` /o°e unci z .xe¢ e¢ u• Z LINE- ncx Z '. .m wwaa I _ Z - IF __ zee s�x°.oes z.� :.j-O�•z _ _ \ / sa IF °.] _.___. —.. w / .. v z feu - 8. NEE Ell ELI, NE &5 ALAN, rtr ♦o t a' wwi 9 zqG e MITzI., 'i ° ry e°l "fie esu.i s 2: ry qqI ».syn y' IPIYn /1", e n 1. EANLAL III ME A C NO L,5 xe:an I 4 an x• 5gJ A. "Iw iso k•oM ei o°z ' A. fi L Y$- ua :Rpl Ell, lel 'JIIn g i I ]a Lyn SPP aeu.i: o oo. \5 v 1 � � I xnlsl x C VO ..wa » wMFNm.wn J ayn ;Yk, L,a/ < 4 •t.l seyn d' ,ww 0� o..ya O \ I v a . PEAK .. ELL PoI n. a .:e •� axa.m S 11A b I �! .SNE �n.r 4 "aA" - iiWAN ea l zw Mn 2ea. } -fi ' 3.. e p O ani r ax�ea \r, g FO LEALIL A. ' °' o ooe a.•.i.l es" All No Im (o� O M •F,a^r u. ] AN •�, y R ze.on e a "• • � L• Lz Lo.` e ad•W �� w.» • �r Pp J \ a•aMn P. ME Ao 1.0 � L FOR 3 ' LIE w. »pl•1 n,l $8 r\ L•• ° S(LfH n. CO`r £gyp\ a,,S po •3 • aL L asiiH _ • r°a P� oz ooz n.a yn o ML z 90 i -s� °°. ...z..w •W za M. w o° n^• x. . al °•p -ox 0 0 0 s a w n ° xnc. ]] ° .,,..o� z x.x xncx z x,xx unci Z x�.x xn.x ,�xx xncx z „xx xnc. z .�xz T xxx .x� Z .x: ':'�x z- x�ue �� $.. xncx z" - L.xx u.,c. °Z. .axe _ - xne. xnc. xerz. ,' iL zxx zxc '+ za zxc xe of ° x° oo s.x sz. w °° .M,m \ . I�aou..w Law e.-I..I " «.� x au .x. NE .. t.R.ed .... _— m A mcll". _ _ — . . --- © COUNTY OF SUFFOLK m�SOUTHOI i , edIIIWAP .,._ . — -- - AAA �°s--'vs Real Proparry Tax Service Agency • •iO ]R",,,r; '] "•�"<' `o' — — — - - © COUNTY OF SUFFOLK oa SOUTHOLD z.,x,.....,_ x� - - O ><.xs.ax, ncea '—� __ - P y Service Agency _,.. AAA A- 'A „ „ d -- .,o Lrr o. - ,� Repl Pro erl Tox ,n. Mna¢ w aoo _ 1000 095 . . .eo ml <......... �.. °4 Ri...hwd,L L.NLr Yerl ��^'^'"x n+ ... .,, e• wcerc ata]n w. - e.. _ex ... -.. r • ' R x»hsod,L L.Na.York nn - PROPERLY MAP - -- -- -- 5 - - - - ----- --- - 25 50 h - - = - 6c'p s Sip .. _-. 6F _ O S� AREA 2 �I AREA 3 II II I AREA 1 s 1 �i I ��__ _ -r f —77 _ ----- - - ----- - 1- �- i .61 .0 --- \`.o 114SC I 1.I I / = PROPERTY LINE I \ I I- = WATERSHED LIMIT LINE FIGURE 1 o s ALIPERTI ESTATES SCALE: 1" = 200' DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS j AREA 1 = 2.05 ACRES TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA AREA 1 + AREA 2 + AREA 3 = 19.02 ACRES MAY 7pl*; AREA 2 = 7.74 ACRES AREA 3 = 9.23 ACRES TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF ALIPERTI ESTATES = AREA 3 = 9.23 ACRES TOTAL AREA WITH HIGH PERMEABILITY BEACH SAND = AREA 1 + AREA 2 = 9.79 ACRES N 11 • sir�c, W� O 1 \ Q iO h1° X373.05' Z i KEY MAP "SCALE• 1 '= 600' ` o ACRES SOUNpVIEW S. 33. 07 50 E:' - - 'i p ---.1 1/2' asphalt wearing course ----- - - 344.59. 2 I/2' asphalt binder course 1471.00 W \ 4' compacted thickness stone blend o/ crushed N/O/F Se^ _ - --- N�•32.17j0• 2�h�� '� w ` A, concrete base m �! n � •y � TYPICAL CROSSDWAY SECTION h - -- -- s, LOT 1 AC"" sEroFF - - - - -- - \ D S. 33•\14' 50 E 5 � , '— \82891 422.29' 0 j0, y. 139.40 1 N.30. 5 0 W 60 _ , opo 5 P 32.2 On reR o.v� ' 717.46' ------------ - ' D W. N. 32. 09' p0 773.92' cam, AC RES e6' cR1 2 6 4.50` pUNOVIEW 95.4 4' N/O/F5s W. 32. 3 BAER 82 32' 4B' O• 34 ? 70' e831. ROSE no 7 ape �p� -_ �.� Nj N/O/F �� Lot 3ai,,• `� 9 1p0• W. 11 1d 31. 32' 'I Z $ � \ _ y.r�' u - - - - n a_Y 1 1 - '-�� SKETCH PLAN OF (n oz _ 4 A i ALIPERTI ESTATES. AT MATTITUCK v I = � TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. + � . _ Of NF AREA .= 45.2155 acres 1000 - 95 - 01 - 03 BUILDING ZONE R 80 8 A-C � AI I 9235 ya= 1347.85' D 4, F, to tie line SCALE 1"= 100' SCHOOL DISTRICT: #'9 FIRE DISTRICT CUTCHOGUE u U MAR. 30 1992 = }�1 �a p ti OWNER-DEVELOPER Dec. 3,/992 (revision) I revision / 24' I \s H. BAER All ,C B. ANTHONY-ALIPERTI Feb. 191993 (revision) I L 9 W I e ROSE JUN 8199,1 (Q9B 7e6- ND BOX /49 40 A . HOX SHIRLEY, NY. 11967 May 6, 1993 (revision Al -D A42A2O 4N£ <2a C°ASTA Ego}/pN F/AZAep PQ.EP MAPS 1 t ' / N ql 40 NI June 8, 1993 ( ) saurlr "MV ROAD CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERFNCED TO MEAN SEA LEVEL PUINIIgti 'r SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 I - N - - N 1 _, _ _ � 'qHs, ti � r ♦wc _ Ilk WU 1373.05' o o ® Z KEY MAP \ SCALE, 1"= 600' \� ,' m 0 8 0 - G ' ® m 0 �p f a�E ACRES SOUNOVIEW S. 33• p7 50 ® m ms®fh p� T Pray �O (17 0 _ N/O/F 4714°. A5, n �'' � p � i 344.59 J _32.17'10. N - 6 gdl T>Al' RE A SETOFF LOT I ,MT - 50• D' 5`33•,14 _- - \ ' \ - vi 282.8942229' - �9 150 _ i - - - - - @. / : / �� -- I - - j 38.4o'- -- - g30' 50' 10' W. \ - W. 1 635.6 0' 32' 17" 10� I l LCT S 3 C? 00 I N. 32' 09 4 / 3 'S� R LO oft •� - /_--- 773.92' AC E$ c _ S F y 30006 - OUNDVIEW o 264.50' © b L \ bd �\\ / _ WO/F a 1 `� 1Q 59544 p ©A/ 2 p o yr' X29 m 32 30. j0' W. �a s o c 1 ' . G _ 3 D / �A L N. 13AER U ' _y r 1ss Fl. — _ / S69 _ l 1 QG a— 831.70 ROSE a 5 ' j0 i 32� 48 1 - + N/O/F I a 2972-4. 31' 32;: p0 1"' z .� N I - - /Z✓�" 06C> - - - —_ \ vL%. - n it D - _- LAND DIVISION ALIPERTI ES TES. m e >> « N o _ N . - ATMATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1 - - o SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. t!� sal L ��' /a1 °" 049:61' " MSS°9 AREA .= 45.2155 acres 1000 - 95 - 01 - 03 BUILDING L'O -—R-80 8 A-C O Zooms \ a to tie line SCALE: 1"= 100' scHoaL ols'TR/c rs C ' / 347.85 D MAR. 3O FIRE' DISTRICT CUTCHOGUE z 1992 _ OWNER-DEVELOPER - PEC AR$ PC B. ANTHONY-ALIPERTI Dec. 3,1992 (revision) July 21,/994 (Land Division! 1 I I \ a ER - I�U�fI (51�)7Q6- BOX 149 Feb. 19,1993 (revision) J w2s /944 eEws/+�- 1 BA 9 se ROSE H. OCT 71994 - P Q BIOX PD8 - _ � SHIRLEY,.N.Y. /1967 May 6, /993 (revision J"Y a/, /9s¢(,eEy/s.�� I 124 =MAN RaAU - - June 8, 1993 (revision)�`T '6, r 99a(revs/�)fLaoD f/gZARD 4Ne' Aed C*ASlAl S&o ON f/A,Aep A2ES MAPS I � / 40' 40�I W' N/^/ 3 SO!/7MOLD, KY. 11D71 J a 9, /993 3J I N' 31 �� l' F 50uHoiDicvdv CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO MEAN SEA ,LEVEL POM01 aw - - 85-185. a oyJ i N � i ; � Q 0 0 %1v373 p5, o m ,� Z m � � CD m KEY MAP - •' m A o SCALE.: 1"= 600' m p ACRES ��S m -6 QED ,�/on � ems G 5 e olad VIEW han eO"1,, EYs 650 S. 33• p75o E OL)Np /De n 0L m f o ose� 5aSe 1471.0° �4 G 344.59 . - N/O/F ✓°n ": o N..32'1 T10" W. ym oy�d 5�) �" m LC2 50,0, /= A - ] A " G '� a SETOFF I prof - M - -- - - - � sa L07 ACMT `s �0, E_ ,5,�''-` e°ve%f� '\ /��� / 7 D, 5. 33•\14 5 1 1 bld�'j s7 l' �� 1 / � 'rd 'V \ 422.29' -10' W 139.40' N 30' 5. 10' W. 1 65.60 e"vel°P 717-46' Ns2' 09' oo w. .9x' y ACRES �CRE�S � 0' / b W 1264.5 SNp � 0 y5.40N � d � �y 32. 30' 5H 0' - , - 1 bld'S ° C ✓ fro' C� I S. 32 4B _ A T S R to✓e) m 831.70' ROSE �k 297.24 ' A Low n N/O/F lammlf v C> � 1 00' W. 31. 32 z^ io ,1�, G•,— �� ° 1 n O L/ A i 9 LAND DIVISION - ALPER TI ES TA TES > AT MATTITUCK p aZ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD � I / � 1049.61' SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. �1 / Z, AREA = 45.2155 acres 1000 - 95 - 01 - 03 BUILDING ZONE: R 80 8 A-C I D �-� - - �_ ' 1347.65' a to tie line SCALE 1 = 100/ SCHOOL DISTRICT: #9 Z - ! FIRE DISTRICT CUTCHOGUE 10 A % MEW MAR. 30 1992 _OWNER-DEVELOPER Dec. 3,1992 (revision) July 21,1994 (Land Division) y�, H BAB. ANTHONY ALIPERTI I O 1995 J��r ps 24 # �s. ER PECONL�' ORS, P.C. Feb. 191993 (revision! /994 (kais�+N (618)766- 5020 BOX 14.9 3 /9Y9 REv/s/� i w. ROSE P. �. BOX 808 SHIRLEY, N.Y. 11967 ", _,,, J��r I may 6, 1993 (revision 31 40, q0 N/O/F MAIN ROAD SUUi1640 I',gF`y' 6 /994(/ CONTOUR LINES RELINREFERENCED TO EAN SE LLEVEL A2FP MAPS N. c2 PLFIedP�ILI_f;'u14?i June 8, 1993 (re VISlODJ�' T ' CONTOUR L/NES ARE REFERENCED -TO MEAN SEA LEVEL t 'Ja SOUTHaD, AM M71 J,.s 9 1993 s5-185 WATERSHED AREA = 6.2 A cres± or 270,558 sq.It 270,558x0.3x.42 = 34090 cull. NATURAL DRAINAGE AREA CAPACITY AT 2' DEPTH PLAN FOR EROSION CONTROL 37550 cult. ALPER TI ES TA TES / AT MA TT/TUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. -- 1000 - 95 - 01 - 03 40 b° e s �z F Scale: 1" = 60' June 7, 1995 2 ` /F Cj 610 P4 Ncj CL All / / a ✓ ., \ \ 0 o�Q�os� / a o x i zo ti I Q �17NIr- 1 , FO70 V9 i j IiA'V �V / 'PO��1 F A► = WATERSHED LIMIT LINE �� \ I\ \ _ 0 —7q— = PROPOSED CONTOUR \ zo II \ = AREA COVERED BY RUNOFF FROM A 5- RAINFALL --- 5�-- = EXISTING UPDATED CONTOUR REFERENCED TO NGVD. L 6a ��.hSDS& RUNOFF FLOW DIRECTION bpi .� r NNING GOARO GULLY SLOPES TO BE MINIMUM OF ONE HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL !+l SLOPE AND STABILIZED WITH A MIXTURE OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF VEGETATION I _ - --; ,.^ Y.S. LIC. NO. 49618 - AMERICAN BEACH GRASS - A SEED MIXTURE CONTAINING BIG BLUESTEM AND LITTLE BLUESTEM, COASTAL PANIC GRASS ECON(- <5� VFc CORS, P.C. SWITAHGRASS, AND SAND LOVE GRASS OR WEEPING LOVE GRASS (516) 7- -5020 - BAYBERRY, BEACH PLUM, ROGOSA ROSE P. O. BOX 909 THE BLUFF FACE TO BE STABILIZED WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE VEGETATION TYPES LISTED 1230 TRAVELER STREET ABOVE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 .. A'f. 's _r -Yk .._ -. r , ,.a _ _. r _ _ .� ., v nom: - ., r s< ' . ppr 3 u:, ., .: .e b .-, . . , n � .. .. .. .. v '.. + „ .:. . . ,- . .S /[ l l .ry iY�.1-, v . , � _ -r . . . .'fi. .,rte• : .,i r '�� „i .I -Y : . ,Vi r.r .Y.. _ Jiif:Y' r i � ,. "l ' '.' '. .' r _ : - � i i . .� � i - _ .d 4a � , li ho .F A .. : - r '-0 .. r � , ,. ., I .: : . . ., .._ �- ... ,F - k ^�,.x } . _ ., n .. ., _ s a .: �,yr } - , r l :, a _ .� I -P u1:6 k `d e x I ., r _ . .� „ '1 - .. ..e � .: . . i ').�. �I. !.S! ..d �Q r rfl x i . _ : r .: IJ' .. :-'I nil R .: "P 1� 4 '3 r „ . , .. _ n _ ., F, r 1 .!' . tom,. : . .1Y$' . �.: :' .r _. : .. ... .< ... .,. :r'. �. i . .. ' i �. � v.a.. r, a rp rf �, ,i, �, .. r. i. :. ' G. _. I iV. � � .uY F` r�' !" r . . I. ..�. . I :,' �. . .. �. ., I" $, v¢�T�,' n 4-' ., .. a tln ,.. . . .. ' ! '. ' .', ._ . ,, �1 ._ . . . i 'i � V . • i .•r• x., i , t I ,y� I . A r I a,( e . I,.,, rv: tM ' „ 11], _Y I,.. f.. , r..vj V. „ 1 a L�• i lv'l 1' eon r I y + L}r „ LFL I - I t. rr' k LONG /S`LAND SOUND L ONG /SLAND SOUND +I 1 11 IF 2 NG ILA11✓D IFI 4 I,: Y 451.55' , 42' - ;, �{ :.. .F. , a, E - MHWM MAY 1995 4, " , 451.55" MHWM MAY 1995 �.,rl N 59' A'Z 10 N 59�r. �' ��� E 42 10r. E , . 4 I N 59 _ 451.55 MHWM MAYI1 6: - .. _ I 7--- F,7 —�. — — �Q _ i :.,..:.:.I''r� "�'�. ,". ^"6 � _ _ �1w1r� .. . ...a Y� r .''_.,_ xv ° �, 1. �. .� . .. ..,_, ", .—. >v _ __ _ Jor' _ _ }� �n!r�Tr� t " rr �,: .- a J 1 .a x l., " i:P "I :, -,._„ �' 'r iJ,- -r —. _ _ 1..!Ln r _ � x _ ^ _ _ _ ___ ____ — _ _ _ — *e-✓t — -d _l — x _ T'OP:.OE 'UFF ., " ..v. — _-- — Imo " ' — -- ---d0- - — -- �, TOP OF BLUE 4 — A ' TOF�'0� �LUFF i. ..., _ _ A V A — —._ - -50--___ _._— _ __ _._Sg. `� 'V \ / —36-•.,- _ _.— .._v iy : ,y". �f " IX':. .a / ,6�. t —1— -�—,� _ '1 I ../ ,,•'� — ./: ✓ / _ �- , / Yom. -10 1 v r'�,y y1 P I 90 x-i2A I b� / I 1 .� i Fv ✓/ ,.� // �� /✓ II ,�/%ri'6 � _ � � �. / dl � // u % rII - ;�"i - _- -� � / / �/�" (.F' I ��. �.;"'- ';,I,; ,� "'I' 11 ) r i IF i W it 01 a I I / Q ' / / / / \ \ / / / / T \ ♦ W 1 \ \ G m IF \\ \\ . \ 1 1 \\\\\ \\ \\ A V A W S ' V r / /V U — 1, v a "I LLJ \\ I O C7 P \ 1 / / / I \ _ _ _ 1 IF F .L0T,10 , . v--- - -- ---- � � �.-� ,/ 1 W ..� / LOT 10 �'_— — — .'�—� / I I � .- L0�'' 10 �� --- 1200D0± SIF / — / W — — —`-- /'j l /// 0 1 120x000± SF "` ` 1 / " // I ! �..� I 12000`6± SF .. - '' ,;.��I ✓: . I I tr W LOT 9 " � LOT 9 120,600± SF' // / ✓ a ♦ 0 \ , S6 SO 120,000± SF / r // LL. LOT 9 \ 1 ,120,0001 SF Il''' �.••''✓y '.: l `'.//r } , (n \ / LOT 8 /� / ,/ LOT 8 ♦/ i Z �\ yt O z / r iD0,000± SF / / z j / 1 (n . _ _ ___ ___� � / LOT 8 !/ i / / a / I / 130x000± SF / /' z ✓ .; \ / 150' / { / f ✓ ,/ I30;0D0± SF / p I \ / - / / / / .p � / p ,i li 1 \ / 150' / / / Ll C � " "Ki.— / �d / ' i � � � \� ' � �/� 1 � // /♦�" LL / / / ,. _ LIM FIIVAh _ MAS fvl .- IV 0 / ,' . � / � � 150• —+ p Z / / — // / Z91 199' / ✓ - ` j/r //- ' ' : � ' /v A : IF k IF (♦ �\ $ // ,/ IN ♦— / I / / lg 084IN /r♦ I �/ I I �L25' I i N. /✓ '.'- / / I / I 1. 25' \ �\ ✓ \^ 25' I / ✓ / I / 25, d bIiP \ a, I (\ m � b r r -� a _ � 0. \ a IN a'a IF _ ,rj \ LO T T` \� 1 � - - \ LOT 7 T LOT 7 — r SITE GRADING PLAN - EROSION CONTROL PLAN EROSION CONTE OL SINAL PHASE � ��t�� I 'a_.' I , I F r NOTE: CONTRACTOR �TO, ADJUST FINAL GRADES TO MINIMIZE NOTE: INSTALL SILT FEAICE ALONG PROPERTY LINE. NOTE': LIMIT Of FINAL' PHASE .FOR EROSION CONTROL SHOWS THE LIMIT OF TOP SOIL''ApPLICA71pN. I "`,MAY 'T 1996 I,y`d 1 ` STEEP- SLOPES IN ORDER TO PREVENT EROSION. DO NOT REMOVE UNTIL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED. THE WOODY PLANT MATERIAL IS SHOWN TO BEAUTIFY THE AREA. IF f WOODY PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH SMALL PLANTING BERMS;' I q Fl d LEGEND ¢ n Jlu ,IIF , SION CNTIOL SILT FENCE ,LIMIT LINE PLAN FOR ERO PROPOSED CONTOUR ' A LI PER TI � E STA TES ` I 1 I AT MATTITUCK EXISTING UPDATED CONTOUR 'REFERENCED TO NGVD. - ' ' ALTERNATE PLANTING AND GRADING SCHEDULEI [ TOWN OFF : S�OU�TWHI�LI� J .�� TREE GULLY SLOPES TO BE MINIMUM OF ONE HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL 1.'1 SLOPE AND" YSTABIUZED�'WITH' A MIXTURE OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF VEGETATION �` AMERICANBEACHGRASS' SUFFOLK ' CQI� NY, . �. - - SWITAH SEED rMIXTURE A$S ANO"COt�TAIN10 BIG' BLUESTEM AND LITTLE'BLUES TEM, COASTAL PANId GRASS ' GR S D L GRASS OR WEEPING LOVE GRASS: '� FLll ;I SHR - IN - fitV!`! ✓1 : UB LINE —BAYBERRY, BEACH'PLUM, ROGOSA ROSE- }/�!� /� IILI rl WATERSHEDA — '! ` ©fJ"' `-`""a fl'� LIQ 1.1,', - - REA' — 6.2DAcres or 270556 eq. ft: I:� r, t , II !} - - Y r IY "i, - .. - _ .'.,THE BLUFF BE STABILIZED ' I'%P'^; ,' h " ,.;.: . +,' r : f .. :, -, ..' , " . -' r. r_ ED WITH ''ONE "OR MORE OF THE VEGETATION TYPES LISTED ABOVE. r `'�� I � � :: „r r. r, � " - I � � �27D 558 X 0.3 X rA2 —' 3409 r � � -:, i ,',v, r n 0 cu. ft. , I- n,Y,.:: ;,. ", ; - CA� 1� ,r,. ^qr+. kT 1.., r. _ _ n � ,� -. I - .r� . '. . + "Y i I a b l".� tg 1 .. ... .'JJ, ' r - . r. ..., i d. 't',, nt qV4 IY. 1� p y ....a il� n.l ':' Pl niF .Ilan1 ill LA ,,, Ir.... .., - ., ., r r ,. ..''_ i- Y _ _ r l H' ..Ar ".+,. ... .'. f ., .v r .,. : ,. � _ .. .'S '..t F . . ^.'� t�''b I' . r ' � ' ry Y � ?1a, . .0 .. I �, „ .. _ p.,, : , J�' .r, ,., _ J. 'Sanr -r:a :,I :. � 'f_ ., > a � ' : _ .: .., - ..r .) '�. ' . -.� � . , [ _ `Y skr., 4Cr. Is . .�lry R , .i r ., v .. 1 , . . ", - I � ": . : - _:. 1 .,. � : 9' : .. i . . ',_ •' J, I. 4 fx ?J, Y .T ._-_ _-. -__ «._.. ..,u�y.,�._.e_..—..�.r.>_u,._;L.-.L,..I xx..»__ . , 1. ,: a .. .., .. n • V" .,I ' IsE". i� ;.. b 1 '. L ONG ISLAND SOUND L ONG ISLAND SOUND L ONG ISLAND SOUND N 59' 42' 10" E 451 55' MHWM MAY 1995 N 59' 42' 10" E 451 55' MHWM MAY 1995 N 59' 42' 10" E 451.55' MHWM MAY 1995 - - - -_ — �0- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - -_ - - _ — _ — �0- - - - - _ - - - - _ — - - - -` - -- _ — _ — �— — - - _ _ _ _ �D- - - - - - - - - _ — 2t} - - _ _ - - — _ - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - - _ - - _ — _ 5 _ — _ — — — 10- — — — — — — —— — — — — — — — — 76- — — —— — — — — — _ — - - _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ — — _ TOP OF BLUFF — — — _ \ _ _ _ _ _ TOP OF BLUFF — — — — _ _ _ _ _ __ TOP OF BLUFF - - _ -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — — - - - - - \ \ \ - - _ - - - — — _ _ — — \ _ — (a- - -- — — — — — — — 7\�AXA 7,,/ / I / / I � �del� �� � bz P,Ci ! l /i ! � 5I n Ld 52 / Ld I 52 1 / W\ Q / / \ 1� / a5 DO DO / / i \ �' I 1 I 1 \ \ 1 / � ' 1' 1 1 \ \ 1 / Cf) Ld 0' \\ _ I Ld 0' 1 / / LOT 10 \ `_ / / I w I LOT 10 \ - - — - - - � � /—' / W_ LOT 10 � — — / � — �� 6 ' —` " r / / I 120,000± SF r/ / 120,000± SF 5 / ( � / � 120,000± SF 56 / I / / � 1 — LOT 9 � ' ' / ' / // I w LOT 9 � '' _ / ' ,'� // 1 LOT 9 \ 720,000± SF , ' –sa / > z \ _ S 120,000± SF ' �& / r Z \ 120,000± SF ' �� / r Z _ \ __ ice LOT 8 /' / cn \ Z I \ / / }"n z _�� �. , / i / u LOT 8 / 1 / I C_______ LOT 8 / 1 / (n , u / Z u '`,s / u / Z w \�y, u / 130,000± SF / a m , 130,000± SF ' a a`. 130,000± SF a \ / 150' / / // z / / I \ / 150' / / / 1 / 1 li i ,so' / / I / / � ,50' ' /' � I ,50' I / I 50' LIM / �FINAL/ HASE I ' /' � — �fi ! // / Z / /' — Ali Z / / . ! / ! "0f \\ of / r 6 / I \ , of / / \\ of 1 /r \ — / / I / I ! \\ N / ' / I / / o / / \\ ' !'� �/ o / / \\ / /A �/ o' / /�/ \\ / !b6 25 a' l 25 $ l \ �' I ! ! �! 25 I \ 25' --�\ 'l 25' �\ rl 25 �\ Is — \ a \ \\ \ o \ \ __ \ a \ \_ — — — — — — -T Or ago \ \� — \ � � aao \ \ �� — �\ aao \ \� \� \ rcao \ - - - - \aaK \ -- - - - - - �m 0 \ \ LOT 7 � � _ – _ _ - -- - �wwo � – \ LOT 7 � � \ LOT 7 – I SITE GRADING PLAN EROSION CONTROL PLAN EROSION CONTROL FINAL PHASE NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST FINAL GRADES TO MINIMIZE NOTE: INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG PROPERTY UNE. NOTE: LIMIT OF FINAL PHASE FOR EROSION CONTROL SHOWS THE LIMIT OF TOP SOIL APPLICATION. STEEP SLOPES IN ORDER TO PREVENT EROSION. DO NOT REMOVE UNTIL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED. THE WOODY PLANT MATERIAL IS SHOWN TO BEAUTIFY THE AREA. WOODY PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH SMALL PLANTING BERMS. i LEGEND ------- SILT FENCE LIMIT LINE PLAN FOR EROSION CONTROL ALTERNATE PLANTING AND GRADING SCHEDULE SEED MIXTURE FOR SUMP AREA PROPOSED CONTOUR SIDE SLOPES ONLY ALIPERTI ESTATES ' 52 GULLY SLOPES TO BE MINIMUM OF ONE HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL 1:1 SLOPE ' A/) _ AND STABILIZED WITH A MIXTURE OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF VEGETATION x A T M A TTI TUCK � EXISTING UPDATED CONTOUR –AMERICAN BEACH GRASS EMPIRE' BIRDSFOOT TREFOIL* .25 Ibs/1000ft2 T REFERENCED TO NGVD. –A SEED MIXTURE CONTAINING BIG BLUESTEM AND LITTLE BLUESTEM, COASTAL PANIC GRASS ALSIKE CLOVER* .10 Ibs/1000ft2 1 T n SWI7AHGRASS AND SAND LOVE GRASS OR WEEPING LOVE GRASS. REDTOP 10 Ibs/1000ft2 TOWN C✓ S(,.0 1 .I� I� OL V 4 –BAYBERRY, BEACH PLUM, ROGOSA ROSE REED CANARY GRASS .45 lbs/1000i / z TREE .90 Ibs/1000ftSUFFOLK COUNTY, � N * Y. II THE BLUFF FACE TO BE STABILIZED WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE VEGETATION TYPES LISTED ABOVE. - , * INOCULATE, PRIOR TO HYDROSEEOING OR BROADCASTING. - /� wYY\ SHRUB LINE USE'4X RECOMMENDED RATE WHEN HYDROSEEDING. 1000- 95- 01 -03' } 111�� SEPji "g 1 'v d\'rKT AREA COVERED BY RUNOFF WATERSHED AREA = 19.02Acresf. or 828,511 yq, ft. SCALE �+/ [� ►f :'�' FROM A 5* RAINFALL ., J��I/"'1L�: IVO� '' pAl�t?, a,. rr'• n n d J N ti N .n 1373 05 . N (SCK / rya's >tiy o 0 KEY MAP m SCALE 1 " = 600 50n 33 OT N - (471 . 00 Ef• s +s ` 4.59' f 34 SOUN s / - N I 12 O I F - �n?N 0 a.< 32.17.10' W. r °Ss < 5nA � sty ` Z Y r ° r / nse IF 175 $ N fr-q s e n gara \ m 0 - / �_5.^' °<s - ..fit <r `' \ W - •- - - _ ACMr gErOFF \ \ n l 01 4 -�h s',9s �" �Q 'a — _ \ �p'f I °n- /"9 �1 Aprob°z5 N o ✓!n E �A / � 14t 50'� E \ +1,y' - . - - - - - v 1 / / qpo �•° rya m°°' 139.40` m c n�Y ss ° 17 10° 46. - - -- - - O P_ - N - - - - - - � _ 5 12 � \ �5 \ _ r RT�' t\+ - I - I - _rl� `- im _ tt'!° A -- // — — ^. / i n 01 ,man - - /I j t �.. /pOrv✓✓ ,� - - - - \ e�L`3 \ - - !9'u� _ _ '�- - 000 47' N - - ''s / �d. 32a 0B 00� W' +f 'f. 1 o'a � \ - ,° - �` - - - - os4 ft t' a - - / - - l . 773. g2 _ an. ' - bre P !� _ 7 - 410,000 �(1 / A \ 0 E. _ './ \ \ .\ \ _) J i I 2°° z. ,4!5v / \ - \ K x II 3 32'A 8' 10 i ♦ \ \ \. \ \ �2 (�', p / \1 I �t �. - - l�yeo \ \ OoO sf"f!' o ' A_ .r a \ \ O S4 les, 1 / ,95' , R= qo, pN A L /<G�7`�\\ ib0 / _ a�S \ T�' - 0 Vt ' ' W / 19 N SKETCH PLA.N FOR ' ��� N \ " '$ N 32° 30' 10' ALIPERTI ESTATES N /82 .o V-el - \ s��t\ I \ — aH 1 & 1 �' IL 70 N I \ e� s esr 70 AT MATTITUCK ��y .m OIO00� . \ m , { I TOWN OF SOU THOL D SUFFOLK COUNTY N. Y. m , I !� r 1000 - 095 - OI - 03 `11 II \ \\ /221°o 5fmi 1\ \ / v /�,m� f �s`' DO" W b - TOTAL AREA= 45.2155 ACRES �� , —�/ �I ,q N. 31o32 ZONING SCHOOL DISTRICT: R80 $ AC BEACH AREA= 0.93 ACRES DKLE I /= 100 � s R96 Ca c1A \ o / D's 1347. 5 13AE FIRE DISTRICT : CUTCHOGUE 44'2855 ACRES /� 50 \ ROSE _ - Q w 1 \ / ?Po yq. \ �1 10 s t4 / 01 F s o \ 1 \ \ /2 I _ OWNER & DEVELOPERAN z BOX 49 AL IPERT I AREA OF OPEN_ SPACE= /5 ACRES* moo \m a SHIRLEY, N.Y. 11967 s i _ \ 31 ° 40' 40" W1 b° " PtE OF-/y�� - - ` ANY ALTERATION F ADO/TION TO 7iS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION IONN n' 1 N OF SECTION PER C THE NEW YORK STATE mLL CERN LLqqW EXCEPT ASPERSECTIONNSMAOBIDISOPEALL CERT IONS ELEVATIONS AND CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO _ _ „ SAID MAP HEREON ARE VALID FOR TNS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY F MEAN SEA LEVEL / rc N.Y.S. LIC. NO 49618 b WHOSE S/GNpTE'EAPPBEAEARSORNESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR - OF ANOTHER TO COMPLY WITH SAID LAW THE TERM ALTERED BY' P (�' V a1 i�,^ O IZ fiu R--• ' MUST BE USED BY ANY AND ALL SURVEYORS UTILIZING A COPY 'B ANOTHER SURVEYOR'S MAP. TERMS SUCH AS LATHE LAW. ANO - - _ (51 <g6 'BROUGHT-TD-DATE'ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW. - TRAVEL r MAY 1 6 1997 - _ - SOUTHOLDN Y. 11971 IN 'IF ryr 1. IF ,'W,�, i, f % IF F IF N, F 71 A 4 , tt- F F!F 5' 7- 373-0 Vn P KEY MA SCALE: 4"g 600' ¢ab >' 'RES' AC A. 196. 7" W 334 4 so r4r)VIE U pj 0 45 4 - 3 1 go C>00 � F1 w. J 1471-00 317 10 1 4 07 30' Nloli Nr yao F 661 59 5 3#0 1 --- 0�- I ACMT SETOFF - - ' s LOT f3l, AX �4 50. % V 000 S. 33' '40 1 ------------ I--------------- 1 13 9' F1 �y 32' 1. 711-46' 0000059 Ih rte It 0 N, 32' 09' 00 w\ 13 Sb ' L 73.92 AC4 50 RES p 40 000 54 VIEW �T 1-16 0 UND 44 0 00 N101F D" ,at • 10, w 30 06 I E , 00 32 E3AR . r9 e31.7o' RASE 3 2 7 N101F 29 31' 3 -Z YIELD MAP FOR Recharge asin ix apaci y Required A L PER T1, ES TA TES B C "'t > 39., �560, sqIl. . ft. x 0.3 x o.42 z 218,455 cu A T MA TTITUCK 195 y. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Recharge Basin Pro vided I �OL49.b 815' 1 A SUFFOLK COUNTY NY X- I u:, zzo,l 60 cu� ft. 51P 1 51, 1000 - 95 - 01 - 03 f,14,7 NEW? es Z'O' NE-R ,804 A�C;'' AREA =45.215,�5 acr BbibINS SCALE. 1"= 100 Z 72 Q. -y F, - 14 MAR. 12, 1992 Let OWNER-OJEVELOPER, Fl B. AIJTHONY ALIFERTI 'l'aQX t49 ROSE' F:r' , , 0 W. j '�F L F � A 31- 40' 40, N1011_ :$HIM EY, M Y, 11967 kVAS ^ ill j% gg Or, f 0 &.,ACA LEVEL' t4, 4 Mg- Kip 7-7-777 77 7, 77 t�- 'q T� 1 111 1 M�F f • IF wig", IF M! R ............. L ONG ISLAND SOUND L ONG ISLAND SOUND L ONG /BLAND SOUND N 59' 42' 10" E 451.55' MHWM MAY 1995 N 59' 42' 10" E 451.55' MHWM MAY 1995 N 59' 42' 10" E 451.55' MHWM MAY 1995 - - - -- - {0-= - -= - - - - -- - - - - - - - --- - - - ---------SB - - -6- � -49 _—_ _ _______- - - - -18- - - — - - _ -_--s— �——-- - - - - 30- - - - - -- — — —— — — — — — — — 38- - - _ - - - __ - - - - _.— —_ ——— ———————�- -___��- - - - - - - - _ TOP OF BLUFF - - - -- 36L- - -- - - _ _ -- - - - - LF _2&-_ - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - 08- - - - - - - -- TP OF BUF - - - - - _ 30-- - _ _ / - - - - - - - - - - - - 50- //��\\\ \ \ \\-/, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -58 -�\\\ \ / 4e- - - -- - �li[ TOP OF BLUFF_ / - - - - - - se — / / l l -_ - - - -- - - -- — — — 60— — \\ \ \ \ / - - - - - as - --- - - - - _ _ \ 56 - // r L/ 41// y�' I yp IZ w // S� °( k o I� LLJ // . I / Q / ,7 I V ' 4 \ . 1 , W I , r 4 r �� 50 \ DOLLJ cf) v I// t A\ \ . � / /' w 11' °� vvv I / v. . ,J Q �� / U �/ C w /I I ��\ � `` -' .r� moi ' I \V " A '���` � `' � '� , �p '/'� Of O LOT \ 0p � . , - 120,000i SF Ld LO10 0' 120,000± LU I LOT 10 I I LJ LOT 9 ire- - yy / I � 54 / / I �i 120,000± SF � .� �y,. yp / I - \ 56 120.000± SF - - �' y8 /' \ _ / z ' Z LL se A 120,000± F / - 56 /� > / L<_ I I l / � \ / / '�i O O� I �� - y / LOT 9 i y 4 / Z W \� , / LOT 8 / / (n \ Z I \ / y / n O O,-- 56 120,000± S / ii ��- - 5 , �- z / 130.000± SF / / a / Z w I \u, / LOT 8 , I w / (n \ / / / 130,000± SF / o / Z w / / O \ / 150' /' ,/ ` / 4� / LOT 8 / I � (n z 130,000± SF - - - �/ 150' // � ' / 150' � ,/ // O I / 50' LIM F FINAL/ HASE /' ' 0 91 25' le / Io / / I / I \ ate\ I ,/ / I / 25' � I- ' ---125 ,- � /- 251 X / 25' x\ / \ a Q Q \ N w \ \ aa� \ LOT 7 �� \ - - - - -- - � �� Sao �� o -" LOT 7 �\ \��� \\ \�- �� o > ¢ - - \ LOT 7 �� �� aa� SITE GRADING PLAN EROSION CONTROL PLAN EROSION CONTROL FINAL PHASE NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST FINAL GRADES TO MINIMIZE STEEP SLOPES IN ORDER TO PREVENT EROSION, NOTE: INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG PROPERTY LINE. DO NOT REMOVE UNTIL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED. NOTE: LIMIT OF FINAL PHASE FOR EROSION CONTROL SHOWS THE LIMIT OF TOP SOIL APPLICATION. THE WOODY PLANT MATERIAL IS SHOWN TO BEAUTIFY THE AREA, LEGEND WOODY PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH SMALL PLANTING BERMS. —�----� SILT FENCE LIMIT LINE PLAN FOR EROSION. CONTROL PROPOSED CONTOUR ALTERNATE PLANTING AND GRADING SCHEDULE SEED MIXTURE FOR SUMP AREA ALIPERTI ESTATES 52 GULLY SLOPES TO BE MINIMUM OF ONE HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL 1:1 SLOPE SIDE SLOPES ONLY AND STABILIZED WITH A MIXTURE OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF VEGETATION A T M A TTI TU C K - .86- EXISTING UPDATED CONTOUR -AMERICAN BEACH GRASS REFERENCED TO NGVD. -A SEED MIXTURE CONTAINING BIG BLUESTEM AND LITTLE BLUESTEM, COASTAL PANIC GRASS "EMPIRE" BIRDSFOOT TREFOIL* .25 Ibs/1000ft2 -BAYBERRY, SWITAHGR Y, AND SAND LOVE GRASS OR WEEPING LOVE GRASS. ALSIKEREDTO CLOVER* .10 Ibs/1000ft2 TOWN 0 F S 0 U TH H 0 L D -BAYBERRY, BEACH PLUM, ROGOSA ROSE REDTOP .10 Ibs/1000ft2 TREE REED CANARY GRASS .45 Ibs/1000ft2 THE BLUFF FACE TO BE STABILIZED WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE VEGETATION TYPES LISTED ABOVE. .90 Ibs/1000ft2 SUFFOLK COUNTY, N . Y. SHRUB LINE * INOCULATE PRIOR TO HYDROSEEDING OR BROADCASTING. USE 4X RECOMMENDED RATE WHEN HYDROSEEDING. AREA COVERED BY RUNOFF 1000- 95- 01 - 03 FROM A 5' RAINFALL WATERSHED AREA = 19.02Acres± or 828,511 sq. ft. SCALE. 1 " = 60' SHEET 1 OF 2 e� 0 N I. i 0 m O '% ym 1373.05 m m m N Z , KEY MAP SCALE, 1"_ 600' /' ;' �- / m �' m m Jk 0 yro ® m O V rD I IT RES m o a �vo,rY o��02 AC a�lan S e� G 5./reef Irons nets P P,55oc1 50 8 ® o d o o r pVIEw r ham" bow S 33' 07 m m m 5 rr ti� SOON be un o< e 6D 2oa�' O p a 344.59, ob 5 1471.00' - 7` G NIO/F r r°�aSe 5g Ca o O -d C N•"32'1T10" W. 2yh Y � N r o 2Co 1 pr°P 1 [. RFA , eo y � .�` - ; sCTOFF o Trod ' h5� 1 po _ of -.J- sa.L07 1 ACM' C k c N A 5 /" I 4, 50' E. '� p d d9 v\ 282.89 1 S. 33 s71 \ 422.29• 40 50/ - - 139. N.30 d W. g5.60 S E 32 j7' 10' 1 �O I , ` I , 1 A-o," e1 pe/oP� - v ��� ZG n1�Y I 1 �� bldxi 1 i 717.46 1 / i bQ� H ;1 �� �iLrfO� 3 p l �- .l• �� w �� % N. 32' p9 00 W 1 J' 00c) on - ACRES \\/ / '773.92 SO�NpVIEWacG��s�'wd o e \�\ 1264.50 1 X11 \qo� "�n�lOp ✓ \ //^o I'\ a �\ •rz �rc�n 6` p1 4 1 NIOIF SPcdes e 1 ; �� 595.44CD ?/ j0• W. �oN9° �, 32. 30' ER _ ry: 5. 32 48 831.70• ROSE Lo s q-k 297.2-1 N/O/F _ /3 - LdTc 1o 1 / �`; ,+'''� - P Dol j 10 2 , ° r z ,` �µ a SID 1 X09, a 31' 300. W. Z 1.• n Zi o LAND DIVISION --- - � - AiLPER TI ES TA TES: a AT MATTITUCK i TOWN OF SOUTHOLL) =� SUFFOLK COUNTY, 'N. Y. �� -;"_y'! Loi 049.61 1 AREA = 45.2155 acres 1000 - 95 - O1 - 03 BUILDING ZONE: R 80 8 A-C JZ - � `y : ' 47.e5' > °� F9F<o9 t0 tie line SCALE irr= iOO/ FIRE SCHOOL DISTRICT: #9 GUE QDIS3 c p,„ m R d MAR. 30 1992 _ I Jul 2/ /994 (L,and Division) ` ' + 1 ° ' -"- — I BAER ' t OWNER-DEVELOPER � Dec. 3 /992 (revision) Y ,PEC S, P.C. B. ANTHONY ALIPERT/ ) ! M Feb. /9,1993 (revision) J `Y 25/ ;994 (REV/s + b '9 .24 sg �I• BOX 149 Jew 3+ /99o- R.Ev/s,°•�� I ii 40" W' RO? (d1b1 May 6, 1993 (revision } fCooD Hg2A20 4Ne F2cw CoASTA/ �2oj/pN F/g7Ae0 P2EP MADS , N 31" 40 �� N/O/F P. SHIRLEY, N.Y. nssT Y r 3, 199, rws,aN MAA1 ROAD' GDUTNDLDTOWN June B /993 (revision) 3OUTHOLD KY W71PLANNING BOARD J° a 0 /993 ( ,y,e � CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO MEAN SEA LEVEL 1 3 Y 85-185. - -- - - - - - - - - - - __ - - ___ ____ - — — - -__ ____ ___________ -______________- _________ - -- - - - __— --- - . - - . � , I � - - I - -_ —_- — - __ __ ______ ___ - - _____-- __ — ___- - - - - - I -_ �I - -� -_-� -� - -- - - -I I- -� - _� -_ - - - —_ - - - � � I - � I - :�'��_- Z�v,li-, ��_=''��'t:� _� - 1� - -- - - -- � -__ - - - . I I I - - 1, - - .�, - � F - 1,_: � ­ .. i � I -1 I , - - , - I-I I I � � I- I - - - � I � � , - - � - �'L - .7 - �� �� - - - . . - � � - - - __ .I : � � � , �- I I I -- I I -- -I � I I I I � - � - I � - ' - - � . I I -- I - - ��'__'_ F I -,. I - ) ­ t I , - - - - �_ - - - - - - - - I - - . - --� - � - � , - � i � ,. �'� - - . _ _ - - - � -1 __� ­ - I , __ - -, � ; ' _- - , I �_ - I � - -� __ ­ - �-- �� "__� L__ � � � - _ - �- - , ; - - � �.' - - — - - - _ � , 7�_ 1 . '_�_ - - ': - - , - � -i - - I , i - _� - __ - - -; - '__ - -1 � __ - - - - i7i , - - � - - - 1-1 - - -.7 7 I 7�� ; -- - - ­ - � - - -­ ,, � � -- ­ - � � . - - - � �_ -, - _� - , - I- __ I - - I I o� �o r. I I �- , I - - - '­ , -, -, =�'-,,7��'-�-i�_ -T7'77�� ,__1 -�71iiii' , , - � - � ­ -I - -7- -� - - I - - - � - �� - � il-:___�- � :' �� _� �_ X �, - ��' - __ � ­�- ­ - , -1 , I - I 4t , " I I - - - I rt� --;v__,_,'_--,�_�_i �_T�-��- -,",_�� I - , -_� ----. � -, i%1, I - � - � . I - . ,� � 11 - 11 - � � I " I . I ,tl i I __ - � I � I I I I I � I I I ­ - __ - � - � � � - I - � � ���_ I �,;'� - � ­ � I— I I � - � -`1 � - � : I-- 11 - I �-I -- - � - -.._:--I—��, . I ,.- - I �I w � __ - � - - - � - - , ,,, ii�;_�i �-- - ­ -- t ,� -­ - I . � - i, 7 � - - f ' - - I I ,� z � - .. �,i, 11 ��51t' ?77K77�7�� - - � � � - I I I - I --- � I I , m� 40�4 ' 7 '� - - , � - - - - - - � - �- � __ �_ 'T'_�.�i� _'­�_;__ ��__'____�"­�_ " � ,- -1 - - I - ,�'_' - - -1 f - - I i ;,--- - -_ ,- - - , j i ­ � i, - � - '� �' � - - , �� - I I i �_ - � �� . - � - � I - - - - _ � , _�� - - - '_­ � '� � - I 7T __ - __ , , , ,-_ ­ � -' - -,- �' - F � - �11 - � - ­ - 1. ---. - � � I . - 11 , _' I - - I I --�F , � � � . � I - I I ­ -I�I ��'� ,_ - - ­ -1 -��'� ; -�­ - " I I , � 1�� 2.1s. - - -_1 f'_ 1- z _< -a�r' ,�' - 4 , - 7 -07 1 . -1; � !�� _- - t�" '�'71'_I _�,"47�,'- �n_7:� '--�'1�'_iiis I ----�,, , -, :�L�' - -� i;f� '__� �_"."'� � , �? - � , ' 'I ,'_�� - -, � _­ '� . I - '. � . I I � I - - - r � �i_l I � I I - -1 � I , ­ - � - - � ir� , i, "' -- '-s" -�� , �- ' � , -_ - , - � � � - , .; __ ­­ I i � - - . ­ I __ �- - - - I � - ­ zp in, , --- - -;4- '�_" I - - � , 7 '� , I_� I- , �� . - , - - I �_ � � - -7 7 - � - __ __ � ,, I --- __ - --- __ ' � 7- - - I I I - , .- I �I -�:'� - , -- I � __. � I I _.� - T :4n��r_'�� _ ­ I - - , . �_ - , I - - - I I - - - �� - -- � �:, _. - - I - -��, �!- i� -- -�--' - � � ­'� � q_ � - . I - - ­ , - , � - , � ,u - - - ,. I , - - I- � - ,- � - - � < � 7 - ' ��z� 'xla� ,, ,-i- I o���22-';4�'44 ,- 4��L�� � . .-' ���:�',� I , I - - - -1 ­ , - ,,i�- � _ - �- -� , � � I � I �� ,. , � � �_ � I - - - � -� �� . , , � -� � ,� - - _ � - - a - � . �'_ �- � � - __ -, I � I - -7 - -0 ...1 � � � - __ �­ , I , - �- - - - I - _1 - � . _�� - __ I- ­ ­ '- ' - � � � � - � - � ---, - ` - ,,� - � - � 't, - � , , " - - - - � I " - , � - - , - � , � - -I- , ' I -�� - -� �-� --- ; - � __ -, - . � � � ., - - i _�__'_, , � - - - �' ­� ��_--':� - ii� _��'-� I - - i _: I 11 " - - - � - - I __ I , . :_ .- . � � .' �- , � -, I i � .- -i . I I I I , ��, - ,- ­ , , - �� '. - , - i­� , _ � 1, � ­ - I - � .- - 1 __ - . -1 - , :- , , - -� ­ ­ . � I ­_ I �_ - , '. , , I ,� _ A. - � , � I - � - �- - " . I- � - ; �ij, "' - - -, ,�, , � -4 '� i - _�_ 'I, - - - � I - -1 - I - _� . � - - �� I I I � . I I - , '.�"�,� �­- : " - I - __ . � - , - - � � . -.� I __ -� �-W�' 17 i� _ , � � - I � I - - � , , I . - I � � I - I - - I - - � - - �­ _'�1�71_� - I-i - �, -� N%- - - � � , , � - - I . . - ,- __ , - -- - I -,� I I - �� - -� � - .c� � i ,- ­ - I - I Z � I I �- -- - - I � � - � " - , ��- -, , - 1. -' 11 - � '_- �_ �' ,_ � - �_ - - � - i i . - i ,. - .1. - � _ . � i " I I - � I j, � �; 1 71, - - :: - _ _ I __ � - ', - �-�' I� .- � . � aii- Lxr� I � I 4f, . . I __ ­ - - - ",�' � � � __% . I , , - -zl- . ­ � I'll - - I - - - iA , - I : :� I - I � I I _- ' I � " - - � I - - , �_' �'� q�'_ ­_ -__� � - ",�- n -'� - --- -- - - � � � - ­ I _ , L __ - t - I � i% � I � ), , 1, - - -� --:� � _�.' � - � : I- - I _� � : ,.. ,- I . I I I I � - ­ � � - I - - ' , - - I I -1 - � _ _ -­ , � I . - I - - � ,, " �' _ . , __ - �- :_ � - - - - : " �' :!� - - �� �. I _. -1 - � - �' - -��__' ' - � '�� -� I - " : -1 ,"I � - - I il I 41 - I �,. - - - - , , � - ' - - - � -1� .� , - , � �;4�i _� ,- il... t I I I - - - - . . , �_ mi_Z�i;� - � ,- I . � ­ , � I � - - � - - - � I . -1 � - - , -_ ,�__: , !_ �: m '-- �' - . - I ]7 - - , I - � � , I - -1 i- - I - � . - - -, � � i� - � ___�, - � I'— I I--� - i- , ,- . ,,� I I I - , ,� - __ � ; - -__ I , I I - � '��-- � � - , ; , 7 . - . - - � "- �_� - , `Dt. - �, - - - . r 1-1 - � � - - - - - - �- - - . I � � � � :'�I � � . " � - - - - � - � , �f� , - , � - , I I . - I I c , ��_� -- - - �.' - 1. - � - J? - .- , f . - - , 1-1i ��- � I � �i_ - I I � I - - - - �'­_ - - - -­ ­- ,�' _ � - _;� � I - � ' - I - - 11 - I - � . I I -I- � � - - I I _'_' 7 __ _- '�� �1, I - . . " � � � ", I . I I �� - I I ii7e -� - � . - � � � � . . - � - - . � ­ I � � I I _ i,- �_ I � � I � . I � I I ,� - I -_' . - � �_ I : ­___ , W 11 - - Ul - . � - __ - � , � � - , '.I- - �� -"I'll", ,- , ,- � - - - --�=' �-� -"' � - � I - . . I � I I I ' I- - �' �l 11 I I � � . � � , � __- - -:-�E � - I - - __ � - - - ��_ �_i- ',; -,­,'�f - - I I I , : ; � - __ '� '-t"`�f-�":�'�--" , - 4 "z - I- I- � - , � , - �I , �� � - - � �' : '­�' _� , i I , 01 I , - -� -- � -� ,--- �*�'�" ", __ I -� __ � - � - L' - I - �� . - _�' �. � � � I ­ s .. , , .. , , - �­ z; -- - - ,,,,�� , _ iL - - � , � _ �� , � - - I - - . - I - ' --l-f _14�'�'." , � � �- _ � _;�,,'� I __ ,� '�� -, "�-.�� ii,"k­"��"--: - "__ - -;�-- I - I - I I - ­ I -I 11 - , :� - - - -1 . - 1� _�� P � �nv � - I _:� �t. I- _,�J' -. ", . - t I ' ' I I � ­ I � __ - , - - I � I - �, � � . , - i�' I . I � I i __ I I __ 'a � , � L I - - - ,_ I � � - - - - - , -1 . � , - I - � I I � - r - , , � : - � � - li �W----' - 3s-, - � I li- -i , ' . - - I -- , I I � I � I � '_ I -, ,�, I- I , - I - 1. I . - I -� - - � __ - I � , - , , , �, i - � I � . j -� - :_ �- - _' � � - a � 0 __ -- '-�,_ , - - ,:-- , , _r_- �' ", 2- ' 7, : I . - . �i I -'�_ - 1� � , . � - -, 1 -I.:L.--. �;!-'�': ­ I I ; -,��.- , ' ' � I-i - - - I - I -� Z� z tl,- � --- � I��­ 'L_ , I -1 - . __ � � . � -_ - iA - � , �' � - __ � - 'i I I� I � .1 - IS- ' �� . --- . - - , �_ I . . � - � z �� i , ­ - - � I I � � ­ . - - � � - � :�_ - - .1 --- ;_� - __ � � - � _� - � - - - - -, � - I I . � ' I I I I I I i I I � � � - , I - i, , , � I - I - - "- : _ - I I I ::-, -�' "��-_J/ , .-,�" , -: - � - , � -- _.-_ ;Z-� ;� � ll-, � � � , - , � - I 1, I � , - -,- � i , 1 :1 I - __ I­ I -, - , - ­ - - � - - �' " I ' . - - . ­ ___ - � - - : - I - I I I � �-�--1 - - I . - - - - . 1� - -1 - � - � � -� - : - , 7 - , --, - - � ­ I � I . ­­ - 1, � 1, _ � � - - - - - , I � I � � , - " , - - r I � ��l�: - � �, ;l I I � I - i- I - I , -� I � � � - � �, - I - - - I - __ � - - I - � � - - ,- .1, , w � -____. - �'_ - v �' - I,�� - 'r - ; , � - I � -IT ­ - I - �� - , - - � _� " �, - I , � - . - - L � . il � , �'- - " �� , I I - - I � ,� 1-1 - � � I � � � � - - � I. I I - � J - I I - I -i� - - I � - 1-11 ' I - I I , , , � - - I � - :I I ,-. I 1 1 - I - � I -� � .�' , � - I . I � I I I - I - ; - - -1 � � ' - - - I � - - ' . - , - 0 � "I , �. - - I � i - t �� '_'Ak, , I . - I . I I - � ,- , , 11 I - - '* . I . - _­ � i� I �� ­_ �_ _il%� - - - � -� � � -I , i � - � � �' .q -,I , I - ,_ :� . -4.-�I I- t � ,- , I - - � I I - - I I i - - ,- - � . '� � - - ' � - __� t , - I � , - � _' , - �' - I ___ - , . � I � L '� I � - - � ,. . - -0 ' .. . , - _ '�- I , 4 i 7- , , � - - ; �T - � i ,- � I I !� W,-, �__ -, � - _�' , I - � - '_' ' - - Y/l�- , :� - - - - . I , , - - i I � - _17'-" -_' , : ; - z� , I - - ,--.7 N' : I I - - - � - �,�_, A - - �� - , -- , � -Z_ - --�, ��. � - - ­ _ � -- - � -i - -, � I I. � I I � ­ ,- � ­ �� - I - I I , _i7 _ - , -1 � I - - � - I � ��, �zi ' �_-1 I 'o/��'� "7 i - �� -� - �' - I I - -t=� "� I I- � I I � - - I � �. � - - � I , _ � - � � _ - lzr� , .c �� - . , , - ---I­ , - - - � - �' - I � -1. 1: - - - - , ,� ii, � - -, _' :� '_ ' � � I - , I - . .fl , 1 - � � � - -, 14 I - , � - - L I � I I � .��7-' A -� �'-'44 ,- , �� _- , e , - , - � - I� � - � I __ � - - I - __ - - I I , I I �' � I . , , . ��' . ��' , I I � I - t�­ ��' , - I- __ - I � - I - - . �. - I _ - � - - - L 7� -1 � � - 11 I - I I � - - - . I I - , , - � . - - � � I � ) 11 I . M , - I I I .. - � L �' ' -A 11 - �_ -e - - � L ' � - - r - ­ " � _: I I - � � I - - ­ - . �- � � _ I , - '�' - ,-'� � L - _ �­ ni - ., _ I .I - 1 - I I - � 0 � . - __ I - � - -, - - I . I - - L � I - � I I T - 1�- �� I I - I -�' zi�� - - - - , - - _. � 9 - - I � ��_ � 4_ ' I � I - - I - I : � � : - � I - 11 - � - � - 11 I - � I . - - -P , � " , , - , � . - I - � , � _ , - - . - , I I �i� - . - ­ � - - I ;L� - - - - - - � .� m- I . i �. As - - �� - I �, �­ I -, � � - , , � . ,,,,;_--i -I I , �� � � - - I I� I � -,, � _ 7 1 1 __ �� - . I I I I I - I _Ll -� __ � I � - . ­ I - - I - , _" � - , -, - - - ". � I � - - , - - 1 :'� -, i, . - - I I �� I I � I I - - � � ��' - - - I � � - / � I . _ � - I . i- ­ _ _ ll� - _1 � , - � - - - __ � - � - . .' 7 . ­ _ I I - I - � I . 1 - I - � � - - - � � - I � , - _ _ � -- , � � - � - � � . : - 1 � - I �. I � - - � - - " ' -� i- �. � . � j_� �- � I �L � 'I -1 I - - I I � I � ,L- - I __ - 11 -1 I � �; � -- � I : _ � - - - - - . i � � , I . , I - , - � - 1, I I I I I � I- - - - I - . - � I � � - - - - 1, � . ; . I . I I I I � I - - I I 11 � " . I � I I �� � - - - � " �" - - I � ­ I � 11 I L I I- I - . - �. - �. � - i- - I -11 i I ;' � , � ;' - � � I- . - -� I -L� . 1�,- 0-id.03 , � � I I , - � � . :�" � - :� _�_ - - I � � . , - � � - � . I � - I � - __ 1, __ -- - �11 , I - - � I �� I _ - �� :' ­ � - � I � I - - 1 - I � I i � � I . � - - '_ I - - -E . . � , , �; , � - " " - , - - - � ' - - � - - " - I Ift- � _ � � � _ � I ' ' I I - , I I � � - � - . I - . F - - - � - , - '7 � -; � ,-, , , - ' A , �� I _ I I ­ I - - � - - .- - I . - - � , . - ir - - - . �- , � - I I � , . - , � I- I � I - i � - � - I L __ .- ' ' ' - ,-�' " �' . i ,11 ' -, :� -" . I . - - - -1 " ,- , ­ - �m - � - - , � - - . I - I I � , - .i I I - I . I - �� . � , ­ � I 1-1 - - � t � � __ I I I - t � 1 7 � � I I I ' � � " ­ 1, I I - il - � - - . . - I , - - �_ ! ' ' - - . I I - . . _. � I . - - I , , , � � t' � � � i ,� �� j.'� � L: ,�'. I i, - - � - . I . - � - � 5 � ,� 1, ,� , � I I , '_�- - � - ,- - , - ,- , � � � i - � . - - I - '� I 11 - ­ � I I - ­ I - I - � � ,_ � 1� � I . I �- � ,. - �� '� . - �J'. I - ' I I - - I :: . - I I � __ � �" I - I I � I - I - - ,- . _ - - - f -1 'T - _� - - - !" I I � -1 - - � � - 11 I --,- I � - F . - - . . I � � 77 � ' I I - - - �� I - , I : ��� I , I - - 0� - -- � I- � � I - I L I- I � - " ;_ , . I � I � -, ­ _14' '; - _ . , . �- I � - � I- - : � " � � i � I - I I - I ,I - -1 I - . I - F__ �� -� � - . - I -1i �,��� - . � ;F. ' � .�� I - � , _. � : �­ I - � ­ � � � I -_�_' - Ll - . .- . - - - - I . - . I � � � I I I - - -1 - ­ � � - ­ I I I I �_ - - . �- �- - ,� �' � . I 1_lw � I I .'� i'm _� - -� i �i I-- - ' 'r e - ow, � � - � � I - - I � : � a -- I - � - il I , ��� 'ir , "N � I - , . � - , - " _ - 1� �zi' I- � . � �. � . I � .,L- I I � � - - '_ t i. ,z� 11 I _� - t I I I I . � - r � I I I I � I - � - - - � I I - .� - . I I - 11 I -t I � I , _ I ' ' �_ �' low �z - - ,;I � � I - I - I - - '!�- � _'�I __ i __ ,- 1-1 - I ­ I � I . -. , . - - - i - � I I - � :_ - I � I - ill - - I ­ - 11 I - ,I - - , . I - . � ­ , - _ - 1� I - , � , ­ � � � - I L_ I _.�� , � � � - � � - � - - �:i� 1, � - I I � - � I . . � - , - - I �P I I - - - __ I � - _� . - � . � � - , ,.� , I � - � - � �- - -1 ii - I I � 111E v I - - � � I - ­ - I . - � - - : . I I I - _z I - I - - I - 1 A�7 � - I I _�� I - �- I I -1 i- - � , , - ;& � � _ - - . I . I I I I � I - I . � I I - � -­ _� , , -� �� _� , - � , ,; . I - I I-- -1--� _- � - I - I 11 - � � - � � - � il._' - ) I � I I � -L, - � � - - :' ,- , � - I ii �� . - m " I I � ii, - �- I � 1 7 - I L I - . I ]_ - � .;��_� �l I I - ,_ f � - � � ­ ___ L ; '- , - -1 MAP - - __ - I I � - - , _ ­�- - �� �� - - � - � :_ - - - " I I li I - I � I I �" - � I � � � : � I ­: I. : _� I ,- - �� � � - � - 1� I , � I 11 - - � � - � I � I - I I - . � _� . , ' ' ­­ ­_ � - - � �s - - - - .- . - I - I - - - � - I I � �' I � - I I I I ­ - � .1 ­ , � � _. - � ik�c'- - ' ,__:I— 11 " - -1 __ I I I V . I -11 � - -_3 _ � I � I - _� . - -1 1 , - - ��' I L 1, CA41 I _;* � I J -, ­ I I � ­ ' ' - I I I � - . ,I I � I I � - -1 ­ I - - - I I I I - I � i � I I � I � I � � a �, A I '� I I �. I � , �, L'-"' I L - - � , - I � . - � '_ , I i , - - I - �' � - . I -1 __ - � �- - .11 , � � . � I 'k , � . I � � - � I- - � , - I ­ � I � ' - I - � I � I - � - - ­. �m -, � " - � - - - - - -0 - � z I � � . � - I _ ��' ­',. I I - ___,__ _­�' - _ ­'-:-'� '­ . , � � � � - �- - I � � - f� � �- - � 1, I I . _. � .'_, � - ' . . � - I � - I ,I.I � - - 1, . _�!__ �� � - , � - I y - - - , � I '\_ I - I I 1 -7, " I _: �441t� � , - r � ;' I .-1 � - - 1 - 1 7 1 1 : _ � L-� - -- . , L : I - -, - -� , / I _I" - -J000, _ � - - 1. � , i � � � 11 r 1, ­ - -- - ' - 'iL, - - _--_�-�--- 'w � � ", - � L � , ,�� `� � J_ � � � L - i - � . 1 _71;_ 1 - . I - , - � - . � -I � , , � 11 I I - I � I � - , � . � :i��. - - - , I � � � I � . e. I . I I - I �- _� ' -, � . ­­ '_ - _� '�'- I-li-, - � - , 1. � 11 -, - � - - - - � I � - - '.: , - . - - I - � - 1, I � _.� - -7: I , " � !��_' �� __'� ' =1 -i '-'- L � I- - _ - - - I . � . - � ' � � . __ � � , � _ 1- -, . - I - � . - ' i, __ � � - � � : � �_ ji� - - - - - - 5 - ' � x 0 - - , I 1� - - - 11 I--- ­­ . 1- '� , - L - - ;' � � . ,- I - � '�� - I I � �L I ;-­ A" :ii " � , - , -1 - ; , i, - . 1 ­ � a I - � 5 I A, , - ­ . ,�� ,� _47 - I - �-� -� 1, ,- � I � � I , _ � - t- 1 - � � __ , -- � �- - _ _­ "- - I, -, � I � �. � -��:_ - - I- I . - - � I '­ - - - - . - - I � I - ,- - � - - - . "� 1 - - - i -1, .- _. I _ I w I - - i��' , ­ I - L I - - _'�_' --_' 11 . �.� I 1. � I e . - I - - � � I r � . !Lk ,'� �I il � il.- , � I . ii- � , � - _ - - 4- , - !� ,- __ I I � , _ , � - � I � I � a__ ,� � - ­ I - � - � - " - I r 7 � - - - I -- --I - . I I r " __ - ,� � I , � , ��_ �_ - -, � Li - -�� � � - I I 1, - __ I � � - -, L ,- I , , - . - I � I -, 4g; 1, . i - � - __ , I ­ 11 , - �' .", � � � _ ii� - ,� 11 17 ,I- I � � ; - �' .� j I - � , I __ - , ­ � , 1 ", :� ; �� 75f � � � ­ I - � I - I � I ­ - '_ _ _ � ,_ _� - - - - - � -I �' - �_ I I , � �� - -1, _L .. -,- - -1 . - I _� - � if , - ­ I - � I I - - - - - I I ; -,-,L - . I iw - � , - I I I� I - - - " �� - -.� � ---1- - � �- � � _� � � � - I � i I - - . � __ �l - -i- � - - - - I . � -�� : �e � � - � � - � I � -� - - � I 1 49 - - . - � f . - I - - ' - A I - - --- I I - I � � � � - _ - - - '� I � � -� - I - , � - � I � Q? , -� - �_AVJ I � , . -� I - - --- --- ` � - - , ,- - � � - I � . o7 � �'- '_- � - I I � � � �- %" .' : , .�. - . - I I -I " I - I . . I , _L ­ I I 4_ . � I . - - I I - - - � - - t .� I I/ 1, , -11 71tj I � I � I , , � I I I - .� . I � - � I � � ii �- -" _ iii �-1 '� , I - , - � Z-- � - . e, - I - _� I in. I i�l I P.-- - - - ­ � ­ - I - _ . P_ - I " I il-. - ­ 1. - - . I - �� I �11_ � � x , - - __ I- _ I I �- - I � - - � I ,_ I - ' � __ ' - , � - . � - I ­ - I - i4 �­ - ' ' - - __ - - - ­ �:- � � - - I _. -, .�' ia, - -, -- '_�,_,, ,'_ - . __ , - :, � - - � � - __ �� � _� I --iIiihi - - - . -, - � 11 _­i� ­ I � � � - i'_ ii " � - .. 11m, �� 11 - - ,, � I 'T f - , � - , I� , - , , - , - . __" , - , - I I � - � I - � , � I I . I - i � � I - � I - 11 --- - � .. � I I - I . -s'i i- - --f- � 11 A � ___ __ , - � 777��' _` �_ ' - - � L . � , - - . � � - .� - -.- - - I � -N., " � -, � - , I 71 � . - � . � - - i - � z I I . �' '� 4.,�, ,_ , " ­ , � , - � 1 � n � - - i- - . - 2 - , I-,i � CL - � . - - , - - _ - � - - ' _ 7 :' - .- - ' ' , � . , ­ � I � - - � - - 1.- - I - - - � - � � - - -7 _ �' I , , I - , - � - -1 I- I I - I - . , , 1 4 - - - I , � I ­' "I . . � _. I I - � , V, - - - 77 , - - -�� _. - . . � - ­� '� - :� - , � ­ 1-7 1 - . �_ I . � -- -- " ----1 I - lz __ F '__ �_ _ � � � ---, -,__ - � , - -- �'� .1 - I- .. I �� , - ' _� -�' - � ­ - - - '- - -' - '� _".'' - I �- -4 1 - z- � -,, � - - � �� \ I t I . . I � � �I 11 ..� - � , ��- - '�' , , , � J .___ �' - . '-i �, �er. " __ .- , t - - - - - � ' - - � - . - - , ,7 �' , -- ,, " � : . � I I - I I - . - � � i ---­ - I �� � � I I I -1 - - -��� —— - - �,- - - ' , - - - _ . I__ � - lf� - _: - "� � I - "! .. - - __ � i '-� ,- - " " - , '- ,_ I I - - � , I � ' L - I �'_ ­ _� � -:1 I � bv - f , � - , - - - - -. - 3 - - ­'�.-" ��-,I �-I-1 - - � . - � � - , - -­ - - � � I � - - - ' S - � ; �_ - , - 0 � � I I - I - - 1 � � � - � -,- ,--� " ��­' - � , ', I � - � _:�� i . : ":- � , " t� � � ­�:- -- � , � � , - � ­ i 1, : AG"q - 1� 1� - I` ­ 1,-__ — I I � T. - , � - 3't � , �L ,�:' ��- , - , :1 _ - , I_. � _�� ,� � I �_ -__�.� - I , , I - _�_ -`--__ I � - c , � I - - � - - - � I � I�'_�_ - ­ -I'- � I - , I �_ i= I I I - - - __ - - I � I -- - - � . . - - _r ­ ' - . - - - �' - - - - I- i_ � � - - � I � � � � � i � , - - - , - - - 'q I F"o ,-I I . �� ' ' - � . ', - , * - � � - I I In , , 1. - I - . . - - --, , - -- - . � , - .11 - - , -,�' -L - ­ i - ' � I ��_ -,-- .' , . " , - - �- - I � � �., - ­ - - , , -,- ­ , _� - ,:' - L - � � �'_ - - , - / �- � _� i� � - , - � - � .- _- � - � � � I- - � - 4e, , " , I - - �' � i ' . 42nr__ ��. - I - - , " -�',' ,­ , - � , - . - � � 11 11 � ' - ' . L -,r le� I - - - ". � � I � , - - I - � I - . - � " � I - I ­ _�_' � " , - - , 7 -p 4 , 1 - I - �- -frl-- I- it- � - I , _� � , � "( _-­ , _ _ - ,;� - '� � ` , � -_ � . _ _ _ ,-5 ov - I - � - - .& - , - '�_ - ' - _' � I � � - " _ I - �'__ I - - , -z �_ - i - I , � ��'�,";�'�� �:�:,,i� ­ � - �' I , � ­ , ­ I � , : ,:' � cm - - iii, .� _- -At ` - - _ _! ;r " , -,-. �'- , .' ',�I�� - - - I � � - - ­ __ � p " - . ' - l_. i r I , __ - ­ � _­ �, � __ I ­, - -, ,'��'� I 1* , _t4' - -. ;' - - L �' - � - I - � � I_�� - , , - � �v- _� . ---- i__- I .�--�� ­-,--, - I I j ii�-� __: I _ , , I - - I � , I I - � rll -- I I I J-, � � � � ir- , � � �_ I I 401 � : w'. , - � ' , ,_ I - , _ _, , ­ " , ' " -:_�T r, ';' - . , - - ,�'i, - ,- i-I '_ - � - , I I -i - � i I � � - � - 0 u � , " I I �; - - � - � .. I . , )Ar, ' , - � _ _ - ' I � , � - L - - I I � __" , �' �' � ' - I � I I - - I - - I - I -� - - I : I � - - -q- I ,- -, . . , I I � - 14 � . . � . - � - - - � - I r - - q'_ � � - ' r , _ , - - - - � � � I - I � r - - I � - -1 . 7 -, , -�71 ', - Li- , . 7 , . _'_�:j _ r - � . � - I - I - -1 - - . I - I I , - -,--. - � I - r � .- 0_�P* L -_ - '�_' 7- � I - - , I � ��' ,) - , - � . - �__ 'i:� � -' . � - _ _ _ _ �,� _ - .­ - � IF �I � � - -4 , I-� I I __ r , � " � I I I I - - / � � w I z. I I I __ I - __ __ 7:' _ _ _ _ _ _ -- I -, lil� , --,,, � r I�"I I - - - , . - , ,I" -,."- i I ' - - I ,� - ja��'4, . ­` I- , � - ,,, _� _� - -� � � . � . � - . - , � � - - __; - � - 'L� - - '- -- L � ____i_r �ii�" -', - - , ,� ,c �bvl . I , _�'�7 ,i . 4�� " -, -, - � " , . : __1 I , � , I � , I - I ­ I -_ , - , ___ . � � , , - '­�' ,_ " - , , � � I- Ic � � - I t__ __ - - T _\ i - - " _ _ - , � -, I � � . - I - ' �, I� '� -1 . _r' I I �' � ii � I 1� � S t'w .,. \ I I � � - - - - in - _z _� '_ __ ___ -e .�-'--' . - " . - � - . - I � � � ' - ' " _ . 4 � I � �_'-T 'i - �. - : I - � .g I . � I Z; A ' 7 :1, , I �-' '-j-.- ,5i-- - ­ _-"Ir, _-`� ,- . , � _-_ � , -- , , � . � � - I - , - _'. � I r - � . . I - . � - I '_ I - ,� tc.' ­ - , , , �j-�� -; - :�i;�­' - _,_ " , , _i�l' , __ - -� , I - - . I - I - - � - I - - . � i, - � - , _� .- - - - � '_ _" I - -_ �, _�­: ' ' - - r - ._�� � , - , _', - - 7 - 1 `� � , I - � I - � _� - I - -1 ' - .40, ­ � - . � I - I 11 r- -­ I I �� - I I - -I - � ,- - I � i, - I , - .__ - � Ir - - I : ,; . , - " . 1, I I � �_I,-��, ',.j� _ ,. - % - , - 00" � -:' � / � . , " , - . - -; -, :)_,__�__�_- ' _;� -7 �__ _- , " __ �" � � � _ - �__ 7�--_--"�-' -�-.--' -­-:�! _il, I , � � � , - � _: " I I - , � I - 4�_ - -- - - � ,iiit , - -, : 7:� - �Z5 � , _. ­ - I � __ '�� r I- ��j�� - , - I I I ; I - -I- .1 - � � - - , -1 � I - . - I - I - , � I - 7_' , L � ': � I - - v � , , - I I f - _. r . I I 0 . . , I - -A � - _" , � - - - i- � � ,� , __ , , - . - , , - , - _`�' i �l - , - � - - , wvo-t� � __ - . I - , - I -�A ' - I I -,'_' 1, i, , , -. � , __"" ' � ', � _ ' _r' L _� , ': -, li , � "� ;� ii�- , TL -� - � � , � .� I - I , -ir - - - , I I -iL - I I - 1� � - .' � - � - � � . I _r , � z - � I. I o-rj" - - , � � - - - ." - I I I " .�� - 'r - ?" fl - i __'�'. ,' _ _ � _" _� i : , , - I . �� �� - I - I - � . - om \ 0. � � , '. , I - _ _ "_ , _ _1i - _ 7_ j � �, % - � , ; _�--- - � I - � I �_ -1 � : � - , , -ii�__�- ­ -- I _' " _ _i - , - �- - I - . r L' � ­ - I �� - I , � � - - I - � _� lt!k - � __ . I , __ j - _ �� � I - - � . I I - - -,- . I � - � I , - � � r I - '#� - I - I I , - __ I I � _11�_ - � — � --�� I L - - 1- - I . -� - ',";e��q' J �i� g, , -' _ - _;/'�'4� -fi � __ - I I- I .- - - . L ir - - I - I I � - I � I - - '�.'o - . . � - . - I - I 'r.00. I � r i , �' i _ i""_-"�Z�_ t �;e ��,_.'I_ - , � - L � - � i� ' % - ­ _ _ __ - t . - - I - �" 7 �- , _� I - . .� � -:- � I .�� � -- I - I - - - - -� ,,wr: ' � - i I I , - - � , . j. - " '�_ _� "i � - -- , � . - ii- - -i '_ ­ _ r ­ I i � .- � - L - I '� � � I I � - - -64 � � � 4 ,_. � _ � ,,, _ - - - � _ - - - - = -�' 1, � I. - � I- �' - , - __ , _- �_ '� - �� - - i. � - ,�� - I , - I - I / __ � � I - - - - � I - - , �, %- _ I I - I � - - - - � � I� .,-,r,__'. - _�7' _' ,�`�i_I-'-- �1_'­ � I � "" �I -i,­r�� ---n �-,�r - _� '-A,_�� -- ., '�_'�� �L _' � I :'� -1 - I 1 1,- , - I I � I, _.� I �. . I - I _� � - - - I � - _' ­ � I I .­ . 1-1 � � � - - I- �' __ _ � .� - I ­ - I __ I � � . � - , - r � -, - " _� - I i_ _ - i� - - � - = - � I � , I � � � - - - � - � � L V'/ _" �� � � ' ' ' I ` � '; .� - t , r 1, ' " _� _�_-;i�_ _-�­_ -'�L_ -r�',_,_��_ .- L - �' �'- , , i� - -, I - I � . , t - L.. , , I - N � - _'1, ,, �71 ,, �­ I -1 _ - , - � - � , .. ­ � , r . F � - I � I �I - 'r ­ � 1, -- _� : , ,3 .r , � - - - '. ,__ " _ -, _ - - , : � �,, . � .- 1, ,� I - � - , � . . � _. j I i I - - I �­ Y5��' , r r��- _' L ' :'"- -�- - - � .-- , -1, �--­- , 1 " 'i, � I - - " I - � � ; 1, " � - � , : ' � � - ' - _ ' - ii, - --4- � -�"`- � �;: . , t�7 ��, - _ _­ r r ­ ':-' ' � `;lz� I ­- - -- __ :� , - � ,_ - - � � � - -1 . � ,�- I � - - - � I - I _'� � - - __ I - " ­ ' - " . I __ " � , , r � , - - �in'� I - - .' � . I - - ' - Ir - ,� � - - � - ,4 - � , � L . � � � __ I - , . - I - - - I � � � � � - - - -_ , - . r , _ TL '- _ , �-_� � i�. - 7 - - - I - I . � I ' I , ' , � - I - - � - � __*� - � . ,1, -_"�'­' �' 77;_�"-ff I ­ - ­ - _ . - - ­ - ­ I � � � ; I . � I � I - �- I - - � , - ­ I \ �, , - I - - j 1- I -, � � - - I- -- - - - __ - �i --- -,-;- ,� I � %� ,�' - ,__ "_ __ � � . 1. I - , . �' i., '� - ,- "' _. �� I - - - - .i - � I _-�'-'� ._, , �_I .— _j _,_ _' _"r. _� - �- A� � - - I I - - I I �'-'9, . � r � - � I ;11� I I " I i i _� � � I L I - I � �,­_�', L' ', - - I ' . .--. , ' . "_ -'- -iri� , � , � � -, I - ' - . - �7' � - � ­ - .)", � ' - � - - ' - I . ­ I - � - - r _� I I . Ir �� � ' ___"­ / , � - �,ii� -, ­-, '�� _-I - I : - , - _: I �11- 11 - - ,,, 1 " �' i -,� r , �14' , - I � 1, � -- / I - ,;- � li ;�' - __ � t ,i� � . . f` ',­ . - __ - �- -- ­:� , - - � I - - . - � I , � - 'L n �-1 - .- ' --r :�r __- - � .- 11 " �� - '_-� ��'; , � - - _.' -,, , . , _ _ I I I - - � - I � z : , I r I - . � i - I i - � I - I _ � / - I- ­� - �' I "�- - � ­ � . . " ­ - , _ -1" I'1'1� �' � I ­ I , � � � - I � - - I 1� .;, I ­ I -, - � � ',- - I I �'., I 11 . L - I 1 r4 �- . � � - I I . - . , I - - , � I L ' - - -�._ - -_� �� � _� I - - � - r ,m, ." I - , -, __ -, , -1. ' I - �_� . , - ­ . � - I - �, 11 - � - , I r I I I � - - - , I I I I _� � - . * - 1: � li - - � � � - I � - - - - - - - I � I - 11 I - i � IS, i 4 � - �- - , i � - - I I I . -'L--I- - - ­�,�- �-, I—' -, - __­,"�� .. , �'! -1 �- �) ' I ­ 1 7 - -- _�_ , . � : , - , ­ � �3 r � � I - - � , ./ I I , , , I � ­__ ; ­ - - _�� " � �i � I - - � - - , '�' L , , � � I - - - , �t ,r � ��' I �;_ I ,--- I ' � .I-L ' I �, - : 7 1 , .' '�__ _ , ___' -1--, , � - - 5 iii��_ � - i 4 - � � � I - "_� � � 1� \ - I � - � ­ - - ­ r - � lix,i ' - - �' � ,- . � - I �A"' - I - - � �� - � i . ­I 1 7 - � - I ,-- -r-- -, � � - I t I ,_ ­ � . � ,- . - I " � � , _' �, I - � , - � � '- .- I 1. .1 - I I - - I - � f - . _" 4 i , : - , - - - - morl' 139. � . Aq" � , I - - v -, � - �' 11 . - I � - ��'_ -, r , --�-� '-�- � -���- ;1�'- , ' . � I L - � " - � - � ' - -;� - I�. r - I- � I i., � - - � � - "i �' " 1_ . "� - I - - I , - � ' � c � - - I e, F, - - ,� I � ­ , / I/ 1 40' -_-. � � I I - I � � . . - I - r.. t - ' - � '; � ' - � -1 � � - - I I � � - � . �f A _��% . , , � - - - - � _- -,-, �L -_ , -, � �"" \ _�� I / L � -p . - 11 I -, � I I ,, _' * ir � I � - I ,zi _� � � ­ , .� - - L � � � _ �,, , - � - - . � I - � 1, I � �_ - Isr : __ - - ,--x- - 'ii'- ,-_ ,ii: -I � _ , , _ � � � , -, - � , - _�4 ' - � - , -,� � - - � _ i I L � . I - - � I t) A I I � I I __ "" _� � t - , ­ - 4-I- 4 �� I '� � � I � � I li , � I - -, __ - �' �� ;"- ' " - r;- _ _�_'. - -.' �� I - - - � _'�'- �� - ' - - , � I I I. � � � �- I I� . � � � - - - �'�' - � 1, - , � - r - - I __ , - � � - - . I � I I � -1 "'�� , ;- � I azo I I - � - "tx�� _�i. -__ - I I _ - I '.�- I- .- - - _" � -, " '-- - - --i'r-, --- ' __ - I _ - - � �7 , . - -, � __ , � - . � - - . � I - I � ' i *� -e s I I - - / _� - �, , � : - - �� _' I - � "d;� � - - -_ - - I 'r _ - 11 � I ­ _ ' � - -, - -��r- - _ ­ , I� - - ') ', r - � , �1� - - . - . ­ `,_ " L - . I . I . I � -, � -_ ' . - , �j _ _� q _� L � �., ., � ' I _ 1. � :�I� I , - - 1� - it I i - � - � I � , ­ -I .- , � &7 - I . I I ' �' . � _ '� - 11 � I � -1 - � 0_ I - , . . - - I - ' , � _lF 1;�_ - - I - - ,"Ir I -I ir _­� - _�_ - _ - - - - v __5'�' - � N '�_ _- I I I _ � ,� �.�' ". - � �­z , - � ­ � , . .-5c�' e N 6"t, - / - �' , I I � --i - , - -�-'i,,'� __ � - '_ __ -"_- - � -,� I - , � �7 - -, ,. , I -� - I I A 14� I � I- I _% I � .1 F i�-_ L il �.- - - I - I - 7 z __ I ,'� . I - - . - � I I - - � - �, " - - �- -I � , �, -�_ � 'i, I I I I? I � -- . Z - �j� : , , I- - ' �'"�'---' �, 11 , � "I _ ��r - � - I . � ! _�: �_ ��' , , - - lll�­­i_l � 114'_� I _ - - , , - , - , - ? I .- . ­ ,' 1� - I I I : .' , _1 - I � ­ � - - r _, -� , __I�-1 - - ' ' � �� j� '­ ­ "_ ­ - __ _� ­ � .1 , -�- - . - __." �z�_- .- , - - �_� � ,:. � - i 1, I - I - - / - " - " 0 " - I � - -j ­�:�:"� _-_� -_l � I -�._�J '�ii_, t:�� `,��_r - - _ '___ ` ­- , "L� iw� , L'�� - s - I , � . - I . � - 0 P '�' - I �� %� � � . - � � -1 _1_'� I �'­ - � , iL I � - 14� - - , - _ I " - - . �- - , 7A - ri .'r -` .- 1 , 4 �if- 1��' ,--- �-�-4�' ' - � I - i, !.- 7 - - - -ciiF i, �' - - 7 1 1 _. I I I I - L " - - -I - � I - I� I - � � --,L 1, -�� _�'�- '_ �_�-, � L - � - I� I I � '�r - - '­ , - -, - - I - __ � 7 � - I ­ I I 1p - . . ­ I I ' - - , . I �l - i��- �."_% __ � I � - -- �- __ �- -,- . , � � I - _i� � � I I - - . - I � - j2p!7 L -) &-p __ ,i 7 � - / 11 : . � ­ .� I - . . ,- , . 4 ­­�. - - � I �_ i., - %-� , , - � � � - I . _4�.__ �_"�, I ­ r , ­_ - - , , , --I -" 1, � ---- :, , � - � - -, , _' �.�! - ', '_ 41� � _- ,i, - - 6 I__ j'a P` I � - I I � 5 1 - , �, '_�� , 'r . _�� ,", � , _��i L - - . , �ii:' - ,w - I � - _, L - - -� _-�, ��[�___ � ':_' , - � I � --.r -' - , " ,_-7 -- I F - . - 47 "D I � - I . I r4p "" - I 1141 -y -- I _--' � -" I . ,, i " -- r I' 'Zi 1. � _�Zr�r =_ k,'i� ��' i�; ��' �� :7i , �- - I g 0 1 L - I I . - I �� I -� 1� - �, I ­ - - I ­ I .� - -1 I � . � __ ril . �-i - - - - , - ' --- - - ' - - � ' - � I - - �: , - , - - ­ , 7 ,I _� - � il" , - _ _�, � � Irl, _ -, __ I I ­ . I � � � I _ _ ; I ,'� � I . � I - _�:',t, , I , , ' -�, ­:�' -__�" -1 � , _�I '. t - -1 r )- -k�'��'_ - , , ,�� - � , I _ _ �� - I r,y P, � , 7� - -1 , , - � - /� ';"' I - : - , _ __ - , I _� �_ - ��­_ _ _� a: _ , _ . � " 1. 1. ,x- , - - - ' ' ' `,'� ,,,-�_ "_ � ,I I ,� � - i � I I \ ."r -� -, � -� I - - \ ' � I. - r - . , I r. _� " - , " I - � - - - I I I - , � �_ _' _' _ ,­ - '' . I � I .1 - I _' ___ _T� . 1:r__�'�,"___��'�__ - �"'- � _-Z I- i'_ ",�'-_'­­­ ­ __ � ' ­ I , �- -1 -- ,�z, �' , , � , "i - I ; . I I ; I - k - : 11 I - - . - - , p � - - - ___ - , - - �'. - 4 - 1- � - _ _ L - I, � I I - . �- i- ,-, � �� � ' I � .. -11 - � - - - � � -- - - : - -7 ��' -, -, __ 1� ��I- i __ I - . � �� � - __ � I (V p - . I , I I , � � ;_ -, * '- ,- " , , � - � _ , r , , , " . ,r .11 - I I - ",--' "'�! . �- _ �,' '_� �- , -1 'A��'­�' -_ ' - I I - ' '�'ii` , - - .- � . - I - I , � - - I .'� I- � % � I - � . I - L , - � I �,� z I . I � I � - p - _', , -1 I- . , - - - - - - - � -�- -- - -­,L:� - - -, _-� ,_�i --'fic---­:_l � - "-_, - ,� ,-� . I �- ,­ - -�'� - I - � t � I �1 7 - " - � � � , - � , 1,, T- !� , � 'i 4 � J_ I _� - , , '��'� � ,71 � - I- _ i_�.�r - ,,_- -, - - - . , , - sAr � - - - I .1 - . , - � �' - ,,, '­� _'-' -- i� r,ii 4i _\ \ ) � - ­ ­_ � - I -1 I - , " �' - \ � � r _� - � � i- I I I . r _N I - .�� , . � ,i �' ' � I I I - - I - - � __ - -- , - I I - � - �' - `__ - __ - , '.. - - ,,, � -, � I - . 1, ___ ,-_ - -, - :� r - - r - I - I I 1, 'o;_ - - - , "� -I � I 1,I I -- - � - I - -�'-',�� L - r_�,-_,i . 4 ­ .. � - ii�' �' - ­ '� 1, . L-'_�-' -rll­'� - _ � -, 4 �_'.'."�12_,�-'� ,',-, ,-- ' -: - ��� I . - . .- I - - � - 1� r - �� __ I � - - _ -, , � , - _� r - - - " - _� - I ; I I I ; . _� i�' - I . - I - � . -, - - �_'�.�. - .'rl � . -�i�.. ,�I� �f " . I I - . , I _� '­-"��---_ _' - %P'7- � - I - - , - '_ , L � -I � -11� � - , , - I �' �.......�- 1 � I I � I I 0 -fpwnp - -, I I - - I -1� I- I - �4 _:' - r � , . - -�' - � - I - �' � 11 I _� � I � - - a, -,��,� . i 6 -r 'F--, � � - I . : , i � I I � - I'll '- i- jii� ­_ - - I ­ -- __' � I - " - - - � I - , C - I _-'� � '-' r 1 7 p ' ' "- �_'-,-i ,_�_ 1 � � , , -, - ' , , , - � __-, - - " , - - ­ -�� - �;;'� it�,-��_,7z'�":��i�-� - � ' . \ I � .- 1� _- / � / -. - .1 , - z - . _�irll I'll_1w�__ - - * I � ; \ -,- - - _� _-� - : _ '�'e _�� -1 - I - - '1. - -- ri- , �-i- '�� . , -, , t ­ I I � __ - I I � - I '. r - � I - " Ir ,x � -- - �_' ­ ,i��"�� _' - � J '17 � . , I— . , _�7' -, , _' . --- --'�' , _- ­ - _',� . � � - - %!� � \ , , I I �- � - �- I - - I I ".- ,r iUiW1 - - - � , I ­ 11 __ . - . -, � _�� - --, __ , -� ____' - , _ , - , , - __ , , - i \ " - I � - r I I 4� Z_ I � __ - � - -� -- � . I� I - - - , I-7 - i I I I � 11, I 0 ��:� -�`�-�-­_ _-" _Z� , " - ­ 'p, - - - - � � ,_- ,-'; , - �i;-" . �_ , __"ll'- - , - \ I - - � 1, I - , - � : , ­"��_ ? . 'r � �;- - � � �- I -ls�p � I - I - - - - � I :: - t,�' I __l --� � -" -11 - , "I . - __ �' _� I .: - - %:- v- ---_ r _ I 1� ' .� 1 7' � I � ­U:P . . - - - � - -� - 1� 7� -�L-'_ _ ,r__,_y r_' ;' ,- - - - I I I � I- � '. .. � \ � I - , 3 ; � ,�� � 11 - ,� - 11 ­ �_ A - � . I L ­ � -- - � - � , '� - , - L . I I - I . I - . I - , . � ." - - _'_- -z - , - �"i��_­_1-1-i�,41� -'_ - ___' __ _ . . - 11-"", - - -_ -, ­- -----�-­' - � � 11 .1 ­ .- 0 * - .- - , - j I - � - I I I- .1 , '_ ­_ � : - , I I , - I I 11 , . 1. ' __ " ",� - I .� � . - \ - � - - I I - I � I � - 14 __ --11 - � � � - � I , ': :7-- 1­7--�' �' -�-_-'_�' - -� --­ , �: - .i_ _ � _ � - . L ,i ; � �_' iz- � - -, I , ,_ L - N' ti� � - , , � I - � - , � . "�� . . - - I - - - -- ,��- ­ -�-' ii�-� " , , - - ­ - - I ,- 11 ,, _�� _ - 'T------- ­ - - � _ _ �' , _. --- - -,. �-- ­ ',i--- i � - - 'M - - - - - , _� - I _� I , I . I � - - - , , '­ -L �.� -�6 "7r, - ,'r,�",�--,',,-." �'_ � I � - � � . � '. �� - - I �: 11 � � . - I I . � - �_ ii, . . � ' ', . , ­ , � _'� - �- - - �' - - � __ , - I-� - - ,� r I , - - � , _" ", � � � ­ - I . - '__ '_ - _ � "h ­ � -1 - - i " , ­_��' , .!� , , . -, '�'�ii' �- -__". I;-- -_ -_ I-_­'� --;j- , �!�,r., I v _ I � ­ I , , � - , ' ) - - , \ � � : . ,,, , - -. .%, _-'� -' � - � I I I - � � � , � r -1 __��'�' _�'�'�Z. _:.�L!iiV - 4 - rr -, '� � _, � - _g4f IL� I � -,, I I - � , - - � I I- .' � - '� _ - , -1,_­__ � - ��_- 7 ��, - -- - '�'T � ��_ - " - I - � I ' .- - - - -oi� '� - ___ _­- 1 i �if" � , I -� , � - I , - _ _ . _ C _ � _� - � , __ - - ' - - -- - -� . � . - - - - �7 ��"__ � " - - I I � - � . , I I I I � � i ' -� - --��;i� _` - L _' - " 7 -�'"­" 1� '�'­'�'4.. I - - _ . ,'��- I _' ­ r,�4, r!� y � , � I - _ , ';�- -_� - �"'_� �� . . - � , ��r.���. �r��--�_��-'�PC Ft-:-?-- --- - - � � ­ r L �!F �'_ I I I � I I - \ 1�- . - - I � - - : �: - � � : - �' �, � r. 11 ::- -i , -_ , I I I .�_� f_i , I - - -- �' - -i�"", ­ -3�-- ��iz�-. - - , � __ , - , ,, 4- _ -�- -, � ---' , ­ , -, ' � ��--- -�"'.- ­� -�-.'� , - _ r '; -;' - - � , � � - - � ,,, I _�- I -- i'�.�' 4�­­ki" ,r, - - I 7­-- W�� �, ­ i'j ' L, I � I � - I I : - - �' __I - ­ - � ��_" - -- I � �' r . �� , A',i , , _ � ­�,'.,� -i � -_ ��: � . : � - 'i , � �1�1 - I � � - - - - '�� ' ` _ _' _ , _ , - - � '­ ���­ _-_� ,� " L , __­i­i"i;��L._' i -�" � ,- � - I � -1 'k�ri , -A-- , i, , - �� i , - z I \ � I - - - - � � - , : , - L � -- � ­ - , -, �i -- , , _ I -- I fiv, � --,_ � __ - - - - --- '7".,� . - ii-��' _ - - , - � : - -1 , - - i . I I � ' I -- -- - . 11 -- � - - - - - -�e, --- `�. , .� - , _ li�-� I I - � - � � -11- I --.-..� ----_, -, , "� I 1, I I - --;i�-�� -'L%'-­-�� ," - t"� ��- � � - I - I I I � � � � I .- __ - - � I ' - - � - z' , - - - ,-- - � - � I I � � I , , - _r �� _'.'i;l.'p'_�A �'� - c __, � -, �r'__r� J,r-- - , � - I I , - � - I � �� - " ;.�­_-7 f-' -� 4'll �:,i- -�� ,� �7 ­ r-',, -� - -A "Z�'�Z�;�X� '_:r" ­­ - . � ; _��_"iz� !ili -'%_� _ _- I _�� :-� - - __i I � - - --� 1, c t - ;� ,T�#';�",� �7i;---_�'�-�,'�&,� -,ii�_ __� '�� : � �� = -_­ - �I%- � � I -- i,, li� ­_ _�­ I-,-- --F !�'�"'�"-',',,�' . _. - I \ - � I- __ �' - I �_ � -1 - I .v. , - _�'_ �, � .� -I.- - -�' ' - ' -'-_'� - - - ;'��-," -� � -_ - - . I I-, - - _'K_::�iil,7�'i- - . --j � I _ - - -I­� I . � - _� �e ��J_' 1.____�--.:",�?_­ , _�L' ?_� L� - �. ' __.' , -, . , r 4riiiZ'", '-'�_' ­_��---'� �Y_ ,--'.- "�!' �" � � i- . . I .� � ( --- I . - ,-- - �' 1 'z � _ , �' -, - - L I, , � - - ---- � 'I, � - il I 1� ­ -I - �i�i " "_'-�'-,-,, -----,--��'-- _,� - ' - -AX�'- - ­ ,� � � i�' -" -�.� � - -, ��c � -1-1- � � � - -11 �� '.,-, - i� -7 - ,__- 1� _- _,p_� - -A � ,- , - , ����::� ��iV� _X� A-r '_'RJC'�'- -igf- q -w X"- "- '4- - - �, -,' -, - '_ � , - - - " -" - - r \ _'z I _J�p � '� ­ -o . - - � , _-, 1� '­ '�� ,ii;;'_-, "­­:� , ,�� . � - _ - 1, r- �. '. 1� ­ - ­ - , , , -- I - . - . I I - - � - I . - _ - - - _�_ . � 'a"w' _,� �_ L ", - -�� - , - I I - - _� Z j ,� - I I � I -1 I - - _� I� - - - - - - _� � � - _ � � - � � � - "�i � � -� ", - �"' ,-- -, , , � � ­� 6%0;��4�-%�_--��- 2, � �-"'�­ - I ,i' ' 4 - - __ _' � ­ ­ r � --�-'- i­'i",- , - I - . � - �, .__ � '� I I I � � : , - - , - ­ " 0_1 r�:7� , � �'I _' I C_,�!�'J:�'!��" 14 7-r� � ---_,-- I ,L, , __ _Jr , - i i. � - I , , �� ­ 1- , 7��' '19 ll� I R " -- - R, - - `� - - -" '!--i� �- -� -_ �L;--��--- -1,I - - ......iii " � ig I " _�� " �� ' i ,� '�' I ­ - . - - �. .,. , L , ' ' , ' r� i - � � ;�� - - I - _ � , - � _-_ll � .-�-. -_-��fn_�'.� ----�� i;� � - - i- I - - - 1. " - � I r - � - - , � - , --- �� "_ �� i�_ �'� -,_r- � _ '�_ - , � - - - I _� '_- --',_ r . --,--_:�1�5 -- -- -� I- I � - - , � - - - I __ __ I - - . . I - I - . , - , -- � I � - - - - , , �� I I , . 'F � % I ­,' '=�­ z - ,� � ('�%­ i ' - � - - ­2-'�fz�'�'i , _L A'_Zi�:-:� ,u�'-'-"'A��'�� i�-, - � �"_�-­ --- � - - � � -- � I ,­ j� i, - Iot��- - -im --- 'w, I � I I � � - '­ � ' , __�' - � � � . I - .. - -i�:- -i�04' �R �ii -�:�,��'-*'--_ - �` --�;t--,I�-�r `F� ;', - � I— 11 - __1 '4 A - __ , - _ '�t � ? 'Z' --, " ­ ­ "' - I I _ - ' - - i� I � �I. - I I'- - I e - - ,_ E _1-1_ i-cr_A-%- , I - �- -'­ -'��­­ _ -� - , � -- . - )_ - � 1� __N_ --- - -, - - - n ,w �' %�Nj�g_ - � ­;',�t` I I � I - , - _ - ,- - - � "- i- ­ - � 11 � A , I I � - -a. _�'.IhEi - . '_­ �' ��-- �.J�'_" _�Air% "lk� - , 2E��'_ ,ill �r.in:�I -_� _� �_ r ' � r I- - - � 7 1 1� , �' - , , � , - �' L, �'- c�� -A - ,I - I - - - � �- ­ I � I -,,- - - I,- - . i - I -,_ �-­,_� '�'f i� _t�__-,'-7� :___a;�l,1-1- I ��,- -_'-�'_ , '�,- re _ "'__ �­­ _- - �- - � �, ­"' --­­ , -- 1��- � . __ :� __ . , - g'�' _�'!' -,--,--- -, - - ­ , - � _ _ -�� i�" �, - - �. - _�'_"" �­ � - -- - r -, -- � , ­ ­_:_' I. "_;: _ _ ,t , -A��' -� ':�- --r- - -�� .--'�-'i� - I �_ 1� I , , _­ �i: -,�� � � �� I I ­ - - - . - I - � , - - - � - , '�'� _ ,,, , " - -- L�; ' '��-- - �_ - - .1 �__;� - - �K" f - � � ' �' - - i- , �_ , � � �!��_�- I - , ­ � 1� -7 ' _­�­'_­�_ " � - -� - I - - � .t' - - - : i� . - - �-!'-* ­ 1 - - - ---­­.' ,'�i , - - - iii '. I ,,I,- -.n 1, - _'��8­_L� , ­­ ----I- - _LA'-_'-"g-�jR__.--- - 4�ii� -iiL � I— _ - � ,-. ­_­ - - - � - .1- � I—- ii��_'-A� , ;,j�'lrii�,­�- - � � -1 � , 11 �� � - - " '� � , - _c'� - .- . - , , * __ AP __ x '�� ir - . - - ­ - Y � �V� � - - a � I , 6 __ �--�'- 0 7 "�-�-�' "-, - -, - ,i7. I "� - _d ,� , � -�',��"I��: -"�� - 17 4z 1 1 1 - 7 - - � ;�. , _"'; - r - � - - I -_ - ii� -" , -� -1 , I " lt� - ,:��ji:;'**lp'�'L ��Z-_� '�' - W, , , -, __ -, _ lliw'�� -1. � I � - . - - �-- - - ;-, , , -" -t � - - � - - " - - - - �­ ,---- � --' _­ I -1 m , - :.��-�� , " -. ?- -�- - �fi'­_' "- " " - . ,--?C--- - - -_­ii�2':!F"_V--_' IF-� �--�; � � � �, � c _"' _ -, r ­��­ ­ I � , �� r:��.�zswo i , '�-2,�i�4' �;�_ ' - _ - - , � � � �� - - - - '_11 ­ I - *' -I'L 91# - , � - � K - - i I - - -r-, -1-1, __'_ � ;��A'r, _Y_ ­ '� '�. , - -, _ , - '� - _' . - - 7-�__,_'__ �Z�p_.� � � I-1 4� i;.,"�'. --A2­'-'-':_- - � - p 2 - �-' _ _: -, , \ ; ­ . __� .- �1' � �,r ; - -, ,."\ _- - __ ' - - 'I'�_ '__ I ­ __'�­__' _jk6 " ____ � -1 I : 1- , - N� . I I � ­ 4 . �-, . i-I -/ �'�' , , N --- , - t -- -, - - ­ ­­­ . 'r � ; " I ­ - " - _-;.'�- � �-;'�X-','_­� 11 -,-------- __- ­ - i, - - - -, - __� � " I � , , ___ - -_-'AkR6­-.­��'K, ��---­ - � ,,, , - - i , - AS �,*�� _7, - A, .; , N' t- , I - , - T -' - � ­ - , , , -, - . / - '- �­ ­- ­ �'�� -�­ 4�m'� � , , ��tr - _i i _W ,'�.�',.4 r.e. ,,, . - � � _'�t -' 4�iii'-__:�� ' ' _4"%.- � _: w f - _' � ' 4 , , s '2141 " A ,'��_:W iF' � '. - � I - __ - - - , , , :�" --i.­ I � -1 � I ', 1 - - -� -� , -­ - ­ _�N- � " , , � - .�'�,_ - � - � � _." ­ - . ' o - t -"���'�nri_ � � t�' . �_'i __ � ..'� -L _­­ � - _'�_ I - -1 , I ll� ­ y , I 1 , 71� __ � , - ,- - - � - - _� ` Z �� " '� �_ - I � � , --�­.��V-1 , iFL� , � _ ��- �_-_ - '­ - ,� � 1 7- - -- . i , -�-" '� --'� �_-­­ , - ,'_ "_­,,' spw -_'5�� Zl�­Zi7_­��', ',­ ­'�r -I-- -- '� _� �;��W­i�V _r _�' I I' � t ' -A __ � " - -, � s I- , _- 'k --I -- .\ - - �, , , -w: - ��'!''��-'-_"', �-j, '-'­i� ' __ � A4"i� ' "!�Q 'gl�'�'� I , - i -- , - - - _'$ 11 - _ - I ,� - - .. , Z�� -Ng '��g' r '4� -gv-o _�'_i�vil'-;� I & .Y'�;' _1-__'�­-­I � % _ I r -1 - 0, W - , �'_-1�4, , �' gw�,4,F',r,AmT*A --w I�i'f - I , _-, -Ar ­ � " -,a�V - , - "� !� r g, __,� � , , , , ­' - - �nr� - - "I - '-- - ,-L �­ -- - I I I �. � - i _' �__��_�� -1 .--- 'ri, ,-, ii-� I '� -- - _; �- 'v �� � , ­ 51 ' �' , -17� aiiii i��__�.�'�� iL� � � - - � " � - . .- - ' - .� - �* �' _'? -,-?r'� " -------"-- �_ - '­' % I - -1 - - '_ - :i !��. . AN I�' '"� t __� - , �.� ­­ I 'Lx- � k __ ' - �' :-\-_ -_'.1 r ____:Qi_ "� � _,� , - -- �' �--� , - - ­ . ,�- g, � ­ *'%�� �i�ii_`ikZ�_-T'L�,'_%-�- --- Ift .L f'V� 5`7�A-�ix F - _��� 1,� - � '�P' � ��' ­-- � - ' � ' '7 - �� - L - , - - . . � - I : ,,, - - � - ­ ' ' " � ��.�+�� ��-'_­A �­ j" " -_ � 'i, �'__ - r , - - �;'.;�� - I - _ _ " _ _ -$'__,__, ­ s -11 L � ���ik 1--,K--' 'AT-4 Z�W_74 _'�_ -,__f- , - _ �__- —, __'�. , __' � - - __ - - - - ,_i,l�� _� - - ,_ 7mw � � � -1.­ , _ __ __ -- , � i-,)- " �� _Z' _ _� � -� � �fi 27:� . - -it - , , - ­ . 1 4— - - - , - i�� . _jj� __ --,,,r, ' _ _�' - - - --';�� -� I ­ - _-1 1.� - -,_.'--_ __� ; ,' 7L'- -- - , ­'- � ��� ---� , .t-, �' � �L � Z, � _]� � - �, 1� _ ­'__,--Zl�r­�Z - � -- .r 1 ,�7 , - � ' " & --�;'--, ­�"--"i�a i"5-iv _�� '�%"i �' - i' �' -'�- -�----1 :-. � L f �_ _ , .. ' I � - \ � -1 - ,iv" - , , - � 1, ­ ­I I r . � I- 7z�li�­x\k��% L7'� �' -.i ; �� A : - - _i � I � '_ - I ­ \ , , -r- , - ­ � � - I � i��­'��t � - 4�� -�-!��;io� -,,'�-'- -'TiiA­ ' I ." �'­��-.� '-"�' , I � ' _ . -V __'_' - ��P-i� -��i7--- - . _�­ � - _-_ - � I �� !, ���� , -, & _& �=� ;" , - , ,' "i_�_ �4-'�_ - '�p M _­%�15M,IALK_ 0%,- �_ U _kC __'�'_ �--_i�� _,; - 11 _ \ - r�_ . 7, _�E_��r " - �_'--I-' ' �- ­ ' ' 4� "' - __` ,W. a, - , - , _4L � i -,-7, e, , � I - . , "�-' - -l" I -1 I- . ��JN,I- , �il< , - � I - -1 �� - �' --" - __E F � 'r , , � ' - . ' � % � -1,_ ­ _� i�_ ", _..��?' - - _ - -1 , I' � I � ­ - - , , '_ � A I � __ - - � _��4t � .- - , _ ri - - - -1 -7 - �' ­ - � - " '' ­­ - i .- , � -r- _ . '_`t___- I - , - , _'T �,­_" ,� , , , iii'�5�� if,'nNf_.-'_-n- 1_1.0�1�r - -,a _��'. , �_ i� - - z �' , _ __ - - : � ---, � _� t�_ ��_Wvs!U!7 ­_,�. ,wt . , , ­ - ___­ �'_=__ _�-�' _� � - , . � . 1, IM ­ � - �:l W� 'r � ' I- ' -, I -, -- -1 - - � I � � I �j v _Z� , ,;�- � I� I - .1 - - . � � I 1� _� . I- - � '_ - 'I � Al-I � -r- I -,t-,- - to x ---- " '_* ......k-,��'-,7.. � � - � - �i',� - I -.1- � \ -_,,-, � I � ---�, -. , e - � � 1� , � . f, .� ­ , ��_ _-_� �. , " _ I - i �w I - I - - _ - ,__ i- - . - / I 2��� � - 1� . -- -'�, sii_Ml ­ I I , ' - - , , '_ 1. . . i j �; I— 1,i� ,, - - - � 1� : , :_ - i � , �bi�ij� - - I _ lt -nig_j"�V � A��'- _� 4.__'r ­ I -7,, - I � - _�_' ' _� ii'_' �� _' _ , � � - __ .�� L I .1 � -� .1 -- --1 _­­ I ' __,,� _ �_"_W'___'��izi�ll�l -�' '7�v ,_ -1, , . I . -L-r,I- 4 , I- - � � _�__ , '_ � - - � � �*�,_ i 1 �� - i - �;i: - _1_1_�_ ­ - _" � 11 I - - , _i� - - I � -1 lmii� _�' _; '_ , , -r - - I I - � - . - A ,-r-j"_�__ � i, ,-'.' ��'� � -]:­ - � , . I � - - - _L � ��_ \ -1 r _I - - . -�� - �_ , --;�7��"-,T,-��'-f-�-r-,�,,7�-��- - � . _ - __ _�" `� ' �i.It" ,r _' ­'­" � �_ �­ i I I I - ._.,,_,,,r, -1 - �'�_ _�_ . -�'��-' �� -"'E � _� - �r,-' '',. _'-,if"�-. .- --- , -­ -, - �i ___Vll_ _�__�ll .,- - ji'A, �...- - - — , �' �, ll� : - �', - I ' , --i-i*1 � � , " - i - - - � -1 . �:!� : , ii - ww _ " , '� - ­ - � - -, - - ­ '� �,� ,'� _ _W, - -, , F-1 i� _� ,, .- , -, " '_ ­`j'�;ft­ ­ .. - - _ -, � , 4"wi -Wnt ,� 1� , OP � - " __ - JWRT, � , ,T4 ' .. - I I :�o­ - ; , ,. - -,� � ��iR,at�W,��'��i,­,' _ '--�� J�_,'L �,�__" I -, I - � I%,- �� -'- �'- - - � , z - ' -- - I � , . I -- - - 3 li� _4�� 17��_ .g�� i - ,77 ___� _- 1: .- - - _1- I Mi�'Z- - I i *. � - .- \� 7 - - , , , I � I: il - �z I -*'Z7 � , . �. - , t, _"- __- , ­,.- - -kill- � ,_ - 7 -_��3i- - .- , , 7�7�i ..�,. , , . � 4 - _1 , - "� � - - - - , - , I , - � - I - I , - I I- - - - - . ­ � " - �' . ­ � , , - ,� , - -,- ­'_­ '� I �_'�� - - �- - NITT ' � - , _ i�F ­­ -- -, �� __ '_ , I .; � � "-- - --,.- - ,' -�i " s k , - - I - , , �, -� �i _�- -i-, ,_- V - i;� w I 71 I ­ I i 1, - - L-11 -__..� , - - � I , , . , - -- � - �' i�_ __ I , ­ - I 'll- - l\i -i �'_Z�"_ --.r ­_ �_ i��_ '�__'_ '�" �L , �� - r ,- - ��_'�� _ _ - - - � � , _ � , SlIFFM9 co f � - I - '.I I - I __ .I L - , ' , - ', , ' --. _ 3 _ - , I I - - - : I �16 I � � , N7 ,;'-'�'�F,f - - _&�i6 :7. - � - - - - � - I - - � -� 2� 4 1 , , I . _�fL�7 _ , �_ _ _ __ , 7 - - ' � - - - - : _' A - -, - � ' __ � - -1 �� - - - - � � , ,j __ - , , I__ , - '� , , " - - i' ' 1 7 - " - -"-�--"�- � , -�_ ' , �'� �i -,-'i-_'_� -- 'y-.-- _�--- �-'_� ._',­'�_- - � � :�� , 1 Ar,,,7 - ,�- � : - �%_ k � - ,i �' ' - I - I - i _� r - I ; : , � � ­ � j � � � - , � i - - � � � - � , _­ - � �; �i I - � -7 - � _�­ � -� ,' , ;" , � - - -ow' 4 Of � - . - r I .-- -'- '�� - -� � I I-_ - � � __ - I I � 1� I I I. I - � - I - -4 .� - , I I -1 � - ­ , - r . � . I . I ,i� , - - - - � - , - - i � , � - - i:�w , -, �' I -1 " -' ' - - - - �� �� - I - '�__ '___ i � � - � . - � �: I ��?�] iew, � . 0 ' I , ;l I � I � - I i r I I , ._, ­ I - , L - � % - - - - � , ' -I r I-� I - -,�- - - - � - - . I I � . ��''�' �I - __ I I , 4 , , � - - - I " � , --, -- � - ___'. 11 -I- I � - - 11 11 _ 7--" �'--*"���_V- -, ' ,,, - , V � � , -`1 I- - I __�' I : I , . I - - . - 1 � - I .,- : : .1 I ­ �,,,�-" -NL, f; ,o , 4 1 ' �. , - 7- - 11 x ,;p, , '_iJ*' - Y?' '�' '/ � -, - , � , ­ - , - �'�_'��i' � " - � � - --'_ -,- -- I--\� X. , ­-__I . �- I - � r � - . - I � � I - -­ 11 I � I I - ,a t, ,. � � .", .' - I I __ , � . I - - __/ -I. -1- - � - __ 1, I - - I � , � � __ _: - I ­ - , -, , , " - , " , � � 1� - LZ / I -- I � � �' I �' -1 I . ,�� - �- � � - - - - - 1� I _. I I I I � ­ -­-f, :�."�_ , - ­ , �i v - \ - I ' ' ' ­ I ) I '' . . - I ��ll 1� � : �'� - ' i' -SCALE r' a 400' --- - s - 1 . � I - � - - , " -1 ,jr, -'%- , - � _�_ _ _ I �- I/ � % - _ I _�' :� -1 I I , - __ I � \ - z N �_*� "� -- - --v-, , �11 , � . , � - , , " '�'Ly ­ �"- '­ - '\il \-, : �- - ' - I I , � , � -� F "- � 1 ­ - - -'-,- -� - - - I - - -' �: !� I I'll , )k 1� N '� � - - !g-'S � - - I__ - � - � I - I­�'r - X�� I - - �-\ I - I , , / , � � ' � - I I - � - I 11 : I - � . - , *� - I - I ­ I � - � - � - I - _1 I -, , W, - I I � I "I - i, : � , � -.10 �7­ \ - - I . - x . , - I - I - _� " t . 11 ­ - - ' _ " � r^-, ' - �' " F; . I I - � - " I - � I I � - j A-4 24 1'9191k� 1 - _�­ �.' _f�� 'e_ � � , '� ��. � r - I .1 __ �i;w'S ��& _� �' � __ ­ - , - I I - - I I �i 11 � - 1_ 11 -�' - I r __ - , - ES-___� -1- : � ­ _* - � - - � - :� " � - I . '. _ V, � - ' 'I - - _ - � 7 , , '__ � - - . -- -1- I . I - , -- � - r ,_ . - � r ,.7._-_, , 11 -- - L , __ � . - � . i��- __ - - r I I - � � - ,, I � .I - - - - - � _­ I - .. .. . I . , - - , - _; - v'-N'-��' '_ - . _ �__ i " , - 4 - — 3 i , - _ ,_ '_' � -- ZONING DISTRICT: RaO & AC Es - I . - t � - - � �" 1 . � . - . - i� - I -,��' - � __ - � - M - VIP-w- - - - I - - . 32,0- � , � -� -, -'1­�-� '---v-, ,, , 'o i - tp , -� w . � � . � __ 11 _.�� I �' , �' 1, ... �� - L ­ I :' .r � ­ I I I I ��' 'I , � - , , I ---a- � I I \ vi_ __ I I � _w'_A'ftslx o' - 1,__ - __ ­_ ` � � - IS- / - I -I. I ��.'�sl� 5 I - -' - '_ �� ,� i I - � - I - � - I �_ - - *1 - � - - -- I - � - - � � 1,-(4 V, ', ii A ki;��­' �;� I - - .1, � , __� 1 � - o. 3 I- -1 __' -, '�z - - - - �. - I � I - - I - I � I � ,_ --- 1, _� .. I - z 1. ­ I -. -- - ,:- � - � - -1 - - . - - I --- . ­ / I :�- I/ ,e&#Y , � r - - CHOI - - I -1 I - I - . , I ­ - � - I I - �. I- - � � - I I i I ­ --7' _ � f �' - --I - vi� - _- ;_ , ��.__ --1 I I � I i -'s X DiSTRICT. *a � � - - - - � . � I � � - i­� �� � '6 .1 - I , , � - � \' i\ �� I t - - " " '--'Nl'-� N I � I I I I I r I - - - - I - 1 � I . I � . � \' - - ­_ ----,-_-,. � " I I - - It _� � � , , � I - . - _�_ 'sw - . i � - � - 1, - " � - - � -.- Ir �' - - � , I i � i I - . . - I . � I � I I - . - ­ __ _� _. I � �- , / N\;�44mfAo­ � 10 - 4F � sTOiCT . CUTCHOGUE - - � F I I ll� � k - . I � I . I . �' - - - - �l - I � . � � - - � - - ��A 'i , - , . - r I - I - -1, - i �� I � I-1 _� _­.t�y , - , - . _ ; __ - 'i J -4 I \ " _� �v — — , -1 I c'I- 86� A - I - � , FIPF�Di I -- - - �' - I . . . . . I � I 11 � I i ,�­ , - - __ '_'_ ' tv I � ,:�::�J-_- -,\ ,- ­', I - � 47. vi a - - , � , , I � - I I. . . . - - - I - � - - - 7 I I -- 7 - - I I , *� , - u- - , � I I * r - � i - . 11 I I � - � I - -� -, , -- , I � . -11 I' , I - - , I I .,_;� fil- � . � I Ili - � I I- I I , 4 1 - --,- \ < -- �_ - , �� I � / - - I . - . - �' � 1� � -1 I - I - - I � � i I 1, , , � _� \ - � '� V, '� - I � . ose I - - I � - I I - '. � _. - � , - % � , - �-__­ _% %:kv / - r �'- -".,:,,--.,: ---- - , - . — — __ &I - q \ � -Ft 1� � - . - - I I - - I - � . - I - r I I I � � " _�ill - , , I � - __ i� . lz . I - . - I - � . � . I I - � , � � - � -� " . / - - I- - N, - - � - - '�� r, , "'� - - � . I , � � �' - I . - - - � I I � � � I � -1 - � - . - I . I " I I ­ - �_ I 1.10 I F, - - r I , ': I I I � I � 7 . ­.'_�'. ,- '_� - _� , I . 1 6- N � 1 40 1 L . . A - I - - I I __ I . � � -1 r � - � � . - . �'� I - I - . j .- - I ff r I I I � � - j . 1�1 _ t_ - ' - - I - -, - - - - , � - 0 1 1 1 DWNCR & DEVELOPP I -1 - : I I I ­ I � I '�� - � . ­ ,a r I - � � - . � . - I I I � � I � � I - � � ' "I I 0 - I \ 14 - � I - I NX ALLIPERT! I I - - AREA OF OPEN SPACE= /5 ,ACRES± � I � � - - I I CL% - / � , ­�_ � ' io� I - _/ � , I - I I I - - 1 t3 - -1 , _/ L 'J�� \ ­ 4�4_-)�ix- � '�' - _ r � - r I - : � - I I - ,- � - I I - � , I �"' -- - - '' F-A__ , " - � , - - I . . � I -H - _y - 1. i . ,_- I - . r ,� —�--r -\ "' � ­��i , � - � I � I ANT -0 �:' 1 1 � , . ;- - - 'z. , _�'V� - I I ( ., I - � � '� - ' � - , m P� i � � I . I � - - . I I I I . � I L ­ ­ - � 11 I - - - L I - 'BbX- 149 1 - � . � - - - I - � � 11 11 1� - � I I . -, -, - __ ' � _ _� I I I _ \ � Ap _ 'i, - 17 - I -1 ,�- - - - - ) I - � - � - � I � ' ' I - I - - " - � � � � , , 4. � I_- r , w . 7v 11, l_ _ - � I I � � \�� - I I ­ ' ', I I - I I I � � - � -Z - . 1 it , I � � - - I I r � Ir � L I- _ ;­ '.Y �f - 7 �-'= I .� � ­ � Is. '�. "i - i , � � - I I w - � - "l- - � - I-- I � r I I I . IRLEY. N.Y. 11967 - - I ) I I � � - - - i-­- �'<'[�wN'w'J2' � - � I � % I I ill I I I I - I � Sk I I . - - - � , �- - _ � 0 1 11 ,,, i. _ � ,- , - � - - \ - 1 . I �- I - - T - - - - � I -1 . - - � _ _ ,- . - - � �­ - - - � � I . I - - I I - -1 I - - - - � - , 7 F v- - \ , lik, � - I , , - - - . � I I I I : - __ .- - . - � . � ,�.. ._`� "I" � __ , �. � � - - - . - -1 " , �_ \i7' , I I j , I I \ IN x - I I �- \ - I - I r � - - � � r � - - I L --- � � I - . - I � � �o . I I — (11 I � I - I I - � '� p - , -- � - I I - I 1 ­ 11 i-L 0 *I - A / !7. 1 <� 1 617 � ­ � . -, , I � __ - - � -1 I ,� I I � 'i-i - - - - ; ­ � _�' .- '. - - \ fn � t - � - - - T �o - 11 - � . I I - . - '_ - ' r � . � I � I - . --_�- . � - I I ­ I , , - - � '.4' . � � - N � - 04 - I - - ­ - �i � 11 ;_ I . I ­ ,� . - ) ) I � - �� I - __ - - � - __ � - " � � . . - I I I I I � - i - ;�.:��� . * I � ,% 7- ' .- � a ,-. , % I'� _�, ' - , � � I �e : - - � � .- � , I r. -� � � I '� I I . - - I � . I �'�; _ , '� _ I � - I - - r . - � - - � I I- I I � . � - I z � � - I � I - _!� - . I - I I- .- . r � Z - - . � , , I - I� - I - � - - � I - i � � � I I . � �� � i 'k . __ ,-I - . . �_ , - - I - I .- - - . I - - , NO 49618 � i I -1 " __ __ ­ .�O' - k % 4, \ .I �_ I � : � � - � . �_ I - , - - , N.YS. LIC. I __ I - � - L I I I I I I - -, I � - I . - � - I � : i_ - - I - - - I 11 I , i �__ ,., ' ' - r)b-'- � JC� r .I -A, I .. � - , 'W . -� I ,% � , r �, �11 - - I � - � I I - 1 I . , � I . __ _- j;- E ANO,,CONjVtjR,-WIVE-S� ARE REFERENCED 'T �,- -- , - .I � �' � - �_ . I -, i , - I � � F I ,� v- -� I - �I -1 - �', _ I a ' , - � 7 - 7P SURVEY IS A VIOLA - Q - - � ; I -1 I \ I � , - I ' 7- IL -4-� . 4_q 1: �_� , _t- I - I , ,, , AmY ALrERAT" OR ADDI To I VON I I - . � 4 -LEV.4riaMs I � � � - I � I 1 4 � - , - . - � . -, I I � I I � I� � � - __ I - I __ - - I � �, . I � I I � - I . r,_ - - I. I . - . � I I - � I I i � .� �' I � �� � -, I - - � I N WUCA gy4atMa� � - � - I � -, ,- -- v EA� 'gsk'-'��v - I _�� I _- I I I I -, - r � - i I � I I -1 � � � . - - I - 2t v��* - I I . OF SECTM F=9 OF 77C VOW STAMN � I � _� 11 . �. - -� - ' - I .. I- ,.. � - I - I I �- I - LSKW ALL AW � I - - - � - I - - � . � � � - � EL I - - � � � -- . 1 .4 - � � � I - I - PE - I - I . � � - ,- I � 1� F ___� �� � o � . � - iz _.� 4 - � . I I - I -I� _� ". � - ­ - I . r --, - I ��I I - ,� , '_ ,0, -� � - ­I I - - % _5- -4 � � - -_ -- . �_ - I � - - I � - � � � EXCEPT Aff Off S-K.'r '""'O"V' CWJES nSWOF 001L Y F ,j . - ' � �_ - � __ , � � I - � - , . ' - , I ­ ', _q_ - r -1 - - I - _ (N6) ?,45 - 4 1 1 � Ir � - -I , r � _� k, ri i - - - N . 1: - .1 -, 1 � - I i � � � �- - hEREON ARE VW. F V1, MAP AW - � . I - � _il . - � - - ­ � � � � - r I I� ii� - � � - - r -, - -_ r � I- , �\ I- ,- .- ,- - I 1, i:m, I I W ANWSSW SEAL W TW SURVEYOR -- I I - I - - i , ;_ � I � . ) i,i-I _ - - I I __ - I i �__ I � -�, � I - I � - ,� - 'R_O. aox 9 _' � - i� I , - I . - - " J-�- �- ; - , - '.' ASS J , - � - ,� �_ '� _� . I - � . - I I I , ,, -, - - _Lt - 4 , , - I - � � I I - __ _r�l 1� � - . I- . , - KS& j � - � ",",� � - � - - I - � � r �I . � - I _ r I � `� iAW=;&A , , - , 4 - __1 - � � �' , . . �__� �r. � � x I-� _ ___I_%\_ _`Z - I . 1 � -1 - , ' - I i' ' I - 1. - - IE R pmek � -, I I .- I - � - I I I- ­ i - - - - - � - ., - - ' - - I - . - � A I I I � ,� � I -1 , - � - - ' � _', � � I - � �l - � I . � -,l � � � - - I I __ - ­ I -,- , � I -� - I I I - I L 4- L I � I ­ �- 7 � - I - _%W L w ­ � - 4 � � r I I I - I � � � b - I I ,- - i - �� - 11 - - . � I I I I - � � I I , :� ,- -� - -1 . � I I - � ., -, I , I , � I - - � . - r -� , - � ­ 7,_'� " I ' � - - � ---- I I - 11 - . . � I I - ' - �- SOOTHOLD �, .*e �� c - � - - . i A) _� I ,- � - � , " � , - - _ r - �' : � Air TIE TOW 'AL T02W - � I . - , ",_ � - - %. I � " � .TRAVELER STREET � I _ � I - 1 I " � �� - - I I , � � I I , � � - .� - 11 I I - ., I , � -- � � � - I_T , - , ' L AWTIONALL Y TO C%K Y MTN Lao - ': - - - � - . I - I ­ . � I I . � . . � _- .I " I � � � �- I . -, , N. Y. 11971 , i �� 2 _ - - 3v - I . � _ __ 11 � � iiL - N I � - � I . -1i I I - .� - - I ­ . _ � I � - - I � ,-. . 1 ,� � . -i , - , -� � I I �� � � -,� " , .� - I - - � , - 9 A COPY . I I I� - � I ., - . ­'. - r , L --- � ­ . � - 7 , � � I � I - � � - �� I I . ___j I � � I � I , � � � , ,,- - ,,' - 1-1 - IECTW*AM- - I � __­ I - � .i I I I - - � - I - I � I ­ I "I I - ,- - - � I , - , I'. � _ I - � � ­ . . . - I - � � I - � I - - - I - � � _,,ri - - - I � � , ��4- ; I - - � -- - � , " , _ r . � - - - - I � - -- 1 -1 I I _p - / - - 1 I - "�-_� - - . � I I � ,-. - � I . - � . ;jl��-�_ � I . - 11 - ,- I it ., - ­' - I - 7 1 - - ' 7 ' - �� I 1, � � � E LAW., I I . r � � - - __ I� - � � - '.�_ . T z , -�� r' - - - - il .- ; �11�,i , ��- �l - I I I - - ­ . I . I - � � I � - r I I - �J,_ _ I I - - � � I I � - , � - � �� 11 _ _ � ,_ -1 il - k - - , � I - - - , - - � . I __ I — 17--. - - - I � � - _� � - � - . � - - 18 - - I , - I � � � - � - I � I - : _ 7 - - __ � - - r - � ­ - I - � I �__ - . - - I "�ii ; . ," ,r - .n' -5 A: -e-, I— , - � - I - : -� I I - - � I � � - � � � � _' _r ' ­ I '��; ' - � _� - F - - , � __' _� - � :i_ __� I I -1 I � __ I - r- I -I - � -mr � — r . I _ � - . I ­ __ ­ �_' �_' - - . I - . B5 I 11 - � - � ­ I - f - - _�7- , , '�_ . - _ �' � � - , - i ,: I- , - �- - � ,� il — — _: � , - - I - � - � Ir I I - � , -,7r , j _ _� I" ' I , �: -, . - �' � . - . , - - � _� I i'_ ,. -, , I - I - - � - - I I " I - � � I __ , . _. '� . � I I � 1� , - , � �l w __ � I , _'T .- - 1� � -� _� _lr' _"� - - z 7 " _�_' - . _ _ ; - - � __' _ - � - - * __ 1. - � . ­ � ._ -1 _ � - - � - �l I - . I � _" , '� ," 11 - - 11 � - - . � � - - � - ; - . , , - '? - - I r I - -- -� "� _' - - � '11�� 1: -1 - - � � �' - L � _� i , " I I � '� __' 11 .,- ,.,-- - I � I � i , - � L __ - 1, - � I I - I I - I— - - � i _� - - . � -, ;. L7 _ I'— � I - - - � - I ; � I ' _: __- ,� I � � '­ � I I � - , - - �� -i- T__.� ' � �l �_ - -;.� , " I - --I 1. _­ / �_' --_)�, - ii, . ,,��L' '. _i___ I . . — ( - � � I - 1 1 , 1-r . ! - I I I ! I I r � 'r , - , � 11 I I 1, I 1, - " , . , , - � '�' -. �e'-,,, j , .�'� ,� '� ,�- �' T;' ::-!�': � , --� � I �z'ep�'4 ,.—:- - I I i� - , 0-g" I � i , . " .1 I , I r I I I � - �'�' - L I � -, I . , f - , I I .� , , 7 , I. � I I I � I �r., � , " I , I ) I , I I I�'- . , LONG ISLAND SOUND N 59' 42' 10" E 451,55' MHWM MAY 1995 zo' --- - --- - --- - D / 38-- TOP OF BLUFF \� C / C TABLE 1 �► R o a e w 4 0 h� P DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND PIPES RIP-RAP B 20 SIZES AND ELEVATIONS I I m 18" DEEP - POINT PIPE SIZE TOP OF GRATE ELEVATION LOCATION (DIAMETER) ELEVATION \ IN OUT PLAN VIEW D END VIEW A AB - 18" 53.50 50.50 B -- 53.50 5000 49.50 F C BC - 18" 53.50 49.00 48.50 MIN D CD - 24" -- -- 48.00 Q 32 �� E EF - 18" 53.50 -- 5050 �' s R1 P a m �I i 50 : / 4 _ F -- 53.00 49.50 49.00 m / G FG - 24" 48.00 r --1 LLI SECTION C-C SECTION D-D LLJ cn \ BASIC DIMENSIONS LOT 10 g .-- d E Ld 120,000± SF Q 54 I . j 5 / / QI . A B D E F G H DIA±I" SLOPE Ri R2 AR ZTI O* 1 L LOT 9 _ C, � hb z 24" 3" 30" 43 1/2" 48" 9 1/2" 33 3/16" 25" 2.8.1 16 5/16" 14" 158 6' 1 1/2" r O,/ - -------- 56 1201000± SF 58/ AREA-1 = AREA OF NOMINAL DIA. _z z LOT 8 } z AREA-2 = AREA THRU SECTION D-D °' j 130,000± SiF a SD i o FLARED END DETAIL --- / ----------- -- --- /- w / z NOT TO SCALE --- 5a /- J,� O #5 ® 4" O.G. B.W. FRAME PATTERN COVER FOUNDRY GRAVEL PACK ERN No. 1228A OR APPROVED of \vi \ �\ _ • 2' ALL AROUND 25' ' � � � f - CUT FLUSH & STEPS / GROUT ALL � % 25' — / PIPES / a / --- ------- ----- SEE TABLE 1 FOR \ 18"RCP PIPE DIAMETER AND L------ _ �-' • � 6" INVERT ELEVATION 6 o � � z • s \ Q4 ALTERNATE 0 9" O.0 • �j �., WO aao \ 40 o >a 2" CUR, (TYP) - \ \ aoo \\ LOT 7 `\�, \\ _ 2" CUR. (TYP.) - a #'6 © 9" O.C., B.W 3" CLR SITE DRAINAGE PLAN PROPOSED CATCH BASIN NOT TO SCALE NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST FINAL GRADES TO MINIMIZE PLAN FOR EROSION CONTROL STEEP SLOPES IN ORDER TO PREVENT EROSION. A LI P E R TI ESTATES AT MATTITUCK LEGEND TOWN OF SOU TH H OLD A PROPOSED CATCH BASIN SUFFOLK COUNTY N . Y. PROPOSED CONTOUR O AND REFERENCE POINT NUMBER f 52 SEE DETAIL AND CHART THIS SHEET 1000- 95- 01 - 03 "� — EXISTING UPDATED CONTOUR D PROPOSED FLARED END SCALE: AS NOTED REFERENCED TO NGVD. 4 AND REFERENCE POINT NUMBER SEE DETAIL AND CHART THIS SHEET AREA COVERED RUNOFF — — — — PROPOSED PIPE FROM A 5° RAINFALL SEE CHART THIS SHEET SHEET 2 OF 2 IVW AlY3i0Yi 4^A^[N'Y•1•Fo,ynnlY i.� nlxi .wrvr a rr�x v ..n.,.,[w. _— x ^� I'r.xlT�3i0Y1 yroA n[N xI'1•pe,yl[nIY —.� 'a glu,lp .qux (luno .n_,om.r "r,•u ' , ,nnn,o Mn ..n M1o. -""•"•pr nl q AI no] rrim oaal J J I,Lx�rx,r u. rr. ... r. ® __ .,.-.r -�--+.•._a.,... _ 000l arn[nn »rr.n.. r.x ... . _ — _ _____ _ — eJl la xo A letlol Oa �- n _x.,orv.e ._• .„rvi..n...n .—.-- �•nnnnvm -- •' �• •• C�60 - . AJueBy ^ 5 1 1 d I b x .- �••• — — Q - - — A]ueey oluag xol p]aaeYd loey �, — r _©__ _ __ --_ __ mon,l un x.w.x.xr. -x--w.�...r�•.r"-'-- ..n.„..,•i. - ..,r-r ,,.r..... - mlonn ,. a .,...rr... � ..„x�,.n....0 .. x - fiioHinos nxo N1OAAnS dO A1N007 e0 .r..,. rv•°•1 xx ..• r+uv 5loH1f105»xw, AlOdd05 JO A1NnO] QQ ..,_...I, ._x--w,�,.x,x�_"" -- I-- xl�.,.�xr,r —'— •,. °O.0C.'....•bd6rx .r,...... n. .....x.. a..x •b� �x�ox m[u. x.. .�. N"I.- 2Uy —x—_ _y - -_ "uno ' - _ .fix ” x .., x.. I_ xv.x _ i. T ar.x _ I .ar.x _ rx” Z ..a... rxi Z ..r., -I S � TV AN 11-1 AN 11 • V ox na.0 wr xx m.0 xm f)oJ I:ii • x x t ,F, ux m... ,a. xS r 3` 4 nn m ,i�4 .fig r ° 9 5 r d 0 aN.rr x nau w lye' •�p a Ipn • '1 m nan,uer�y x \I• ».l� en ax mr u. -NO ' p 'j 101, r`• ubol df r ” IN vam xe. b I06` r I\ e IN Ips C' O LI.r r ..r r Jit N. �9• `9 s - LIv r ' (\ rx, Moi xx ,».xwr „x ..r „xx .a ..r .x, ,»... ... � x „ x� ,'� IN .11 �e r F C p 1 W 'W • i< r rarx xr •10 55a^,x .,. »[ '.,Nt O 'n�•. • fr! � r I[ro 5d 55 rrrNry / r �y/n q/ 5 { °' r nbY a 5o5^ °f 'a^r•bY^ ii jos _ _ _ i .r. .ar. H. ,.. ......... r.... ..n.. -- - -- - - f ' O� Ivey RD�� r° \ \' Y N \ H SQ D: I( O A m W - r1 - RES -A AREA 4 , 550 S 1 o`c —� B 00 OFT. o - ,-. _- - - - - ---- _.'----- '- - M I AREA 32 � 0 S F � o TOTAL AREA ' 389 550 SO.FT. ° OR 8.4837 ACRES I'I lal x sezo \ 4 CR EEK oO. IP •�,�✓ N���• ,✓a11 % CAo� 1t �h 3't @O f 0 SURVEY FOR - GOREf s AYV I oW DEVELOPMENT CORP. TOON of sourHOLo " SUFFOLK COUNTY, N,Y. , SCALE: Ie= 100' MATCH 15, 1972 , .A.X Q•,(/„p,�• LAND SURVEYOR N.Y.S. LIC, N0.20724 RIVERHEAD, N. Y. i NI 1 I I t p I r a 1 I 1 '',1 I• 1 .Jl i x,47", F' t{ _ • ^Silt' n / W '`i M J r{ I r -4 � ( n - - ,�__ _ _ ,� ,. _ .,T, �,�4,*ea �. •q+r.. •-'!{,.�, °" e.-'��. f, i tk wr ..-.F{L+� l� L t + 1' d u. ham" 7 r=; I `4 Ye7-7F .1 N f .p 5e I I r . } r e7A • •. t'S f �{ If i 4 i C o t. , r r 91` I I 'f" R +• &� M �r r d�y7 'r Jt Y y i i tr V SII wd I 'l ! ur(I r 1 `ilk low rleR N 'N` N/ 'JEVG LO('IV1INT GOftPJWION Ir,�Atsutpctuxct� . RR.UOfZ MODULES INc. 'ac�I�r�>:� ; NAGUI. �NUIxouM>:u-rnu o�el�N C�NTLI� - � I 4V --- --- -- -- — U A '.Y `J 1 � N - {1 - - - • _ - - - _ . . - m. - . - all $� may , 22 1 -_ -_- 'T' - � i �,: � ,i�--.."'y. - -- �l F - - 'N �� "-: ` F -§iy vx 2-� � 4T•h -�- " - 1 i 17, f� f'•' - -- f 71 NIP �(u\ 1: i'4 ✓Bf F�]a.�Y �x :- ..- ," � � =aznes � Z n � ru`'c - - �' � S„ i _ [ 1 -='r �" . � �i-- � yr. - - . - t -rz ;]� 1 MAN -''�� �( ) j� r fjn24�iW;'�£-C��1 ��1�Y'L . .:.,/.taA1��]t�1�y�}.. �ri��l�S-.LJ �'1'J MOM, � ..:�.i`14..__ il DL 'UL c ra"" - ?NTFR .Afd 1t 1 5L_ t i9 1 -t}I E U 4 _ C 11 } 1 L V � art y a. lo I Li I I I � I � I t G , UP 1 I LAST FL���C °=l O" UN 17 NO. l — 5l4 5Q. Fi, - ioi7 SQ. FT F+C? . tAVVU,) D�VLLXNAXN'T kn. Ar AFtDrjl\ MOCIOLU✓, INC. UNIT NJ.a - 38'teQ� Fj, UNIT NO cD14 JINN I T , 7 1 r LR I LR D i, DR 00 `io al�'r4" ir6' L tC' vl'' ,4xt � I , ;I e_ -11 *�,�,— '' �(;F✓xlpb" �(� � ALT__'_'.—.._,— ��� „ yyy ' I I L 1 C L � I -LL , I � � � R . 5R CS R 1 Iikr q� %Ip,.p, '' . n Z` RWM+ffi' Jill , , •,. .° „� ` �111 i � �r 5" k,�r I ,�1, 1 I� T �`:;'"{ Y E�i9�,' , I ��.�, I ' � z �, '-, :, _I "! I�' - � � 7=77 177 � A-1 CD ti 4 Iw , [=ry ' xlKllga ,rYa', „"Idc=m5+ t<n+rr:'9. ?J`}„ '•, t� v'^r+Fn ;'I 'rJr ,slg��� N _ �n_ c� n,»+r T -Ir', irn4,a.,;3 ,r - :.5 - - _ .v af„ . i .r: ' . ..3r ,. , 1T`vFd., r.x ,: .."•. �,,. :,q;,¢ , ,7,+•; • I �- ,,, .,, !, ::,",, . -. ,,,c ,,".r; It .: 'r':" -. "^;. �`=r"�` TIC _ h,F: i r..-,J, :, ,. IF` .' . .. � r r e arl x n- - f r'I", 'r<r(:r yti id, .I 1.. _,! - .. - 3'?f, .v.. II,� a;,, "r , z w , '.i,r s :� � & �: r:'a:,y= „fl, . k �': 0 -v;1;t : p,r 'vp,:,. A '};' z s r . 1 'Y' e , �." .,uMAI Hr. - , +„ uw,. . .rtrt t.. . r',.,-' , r ^ x 1.1 'v,, G . ,R.,,I, a,>. r,r" ;M 'Sav`�,•ry 'ay _ ct:; .� .y, . c : , <, . 1 'I r. .:,. 1 a ..I r,': A -',.N; a .' a1: a "JP`i'i•:: - 1 - ',t:N,Sri: s-"9�'.F' I { . ,}.f, r 1 ..�`i% h rf, -.4,'.. .,::. yr ;' -1 '- , :i' .;l y ».: ': AIS: . r ;i P 4. "l,*'':: 'T'�e �", i.C- Y^ 1 . I' c�, a 1. :, 1 y ,,r., : , " �. 1 r. t. '2. ::ilf{ 't 1`�{i'>✓£•� lr�., ft Y �1A�'„;_= � : ,/ 4 _i. - I k n'4 'Si!' i Y' .,'.) ! 1 l ,. .,r >rr.., w ”, _ + ..6f 6 Yi; ,., ,'k,, .+: R" i I. ,.f , ,. J.,..,Fr., J .1a, r, y„u r ,_ -9:,3 - A , ff - ;h.�-I- :.5. ,c, r ? . rx,e�'" ;✓n yram�, .1 •x _ Ic- r. - v - +Ai.'f.: ^sF` v ( u 'ryi .,_;u+,. ".f:, r ..M. _,I'� sY e�,-.nrs f r-1. ,,y J, .lu A. .. : " ', : r.✓ ... v ( . ,:,fit. . , 5: ,, . - , r. -t Yw °:S, ,. ..r "'I .Y '�,_ . r-, t .YI 6. ,r� }. r v . tt d fit yw•q:y'r : , ., 4 'Y ,. ,, :s , ,,r 'c ,,a .,.,, , ,.�, 4 .. ,, . '.v.'=: o "t, �. .� . C. _ „t _,Y:4rr. '4-,.n " " . 3 .. ,. r .:4„+gf. 4'^7- n i. L c.Y'NI i„ r. 4 • ,i,:f uf. .,1'r ,+4 {r ."trF'e x„A 4 p '., .,, .r ��] � .2. . .I i -f t r•' d t -Iw .Yn. A.r 1, t: ,�Y�I� ',T t M YY” -YI 'f ly.: '.1^' .F 1., F ' S•f { ,:IR :14:1 ,rl Y . N 1, N a, ,r l", 'I- v -,>- ti 'A, °,gl•!' . t .- ,:,.. .S'. :..I �.., .r, y _ u - .. ,4 r . , y . 1#...,. ,r(,., .. e e 4�F x r A 'r`; 1 J•l 0. " V: .e _:IA , , uaf0 ,.v 4..r{� .} N i. ',U o_. , 1 i'i-r} iy pa ,y :l 1�'. - I:VY t A. In .. a _ ,a5tl., r rx ,5 "i4v + ,1 t. : r '# l�. n r�Y .d v " . .i r. .: =;. 3 x r'a'r - 1r ' r . ..»,. .. I - 4 d, .y . { _v.r_ 1 S'. : I ,f } ii. (: •I+N, „br v ,Y„y le ! ,tie k 'i p,y o Imo'` w m - ti ,fl' 4 ,n.• f. Ijy�' .rd I, r:- F,”, a; n.�_ I :Ct : "ic �*. }C:- t^�.M, yy 1. t s. a+r . ko A . ., � : , ,.: , - 'f« r s6��,hr"T S„ i.,J nn ,• ir:rri i� xu; Y .,L 'ny., F,. .!A r� r e„N ” -I : :..a.M1 ^ : n.! M.'!rP yf, 4 1: i i,` "'; , , I '.,. ., '.•o-..� ',+ ,.,,, ;.. 'l. r tu . L... .�.'A_ n.. 'W,uf e. .; .'A r a . ,. ; , � .4 "Y.', 1:•.. . . , »:, 4 -1 R r '.a^?Y m f .rhltf .:.h „ „Lrt Fw_' ',u,. ,.,' `x - ! Kh 'w.Tk ui" .r,M„ !y,v 3�TM rt t L A,f, - 'I x:"! _ , ',�. '�' ,r.^h ;.,r�. s :J. _(�1•fir eI G-' _f .+'n mx r' ,I' r .T :S,. w'a I,A�4 .'- r! rN"I"rv�r✓: „ I . _ 'v j, C , . :,,. I dr t :.,.i "p ,}, - F ' .•.0 ..ry, - , ,r �ay . .^ ..,. b k, �f .I -�� :. _ �:n : :N r:.r ,_T,..li L i i '.c ,:"k M•i.:}i'kr, . -r, .t .q 7 . ,y?v' Av " 6x @Ia C ., .s ,rye. ai* l.n " '�' ,. nl e u° L <, . .}r Q• ! , t E ., d, ;.�.: i 1!. ,.pbr +R er�, ,"�": b., fii�" r y, ' :of " hr,._45 -d'„ ( r ,-. .. 1 S,. I'?. ?' ur., , .,.!_ $. 1., „'Y^ .N t}, . ,,. �. J. - ,. , ,.1 :„ ,,. 1 . . „'} t : 'N: !: f may !n 1 J - .," : ., :nr 1 ,. Ie - r- f, ::,, r, r "„ 3.r , . _W . r r, ` ,E : I ,.r o . ...,.v t.. =, ` t ��„ A' }u ,t• „t,a ' ., ,. _ :.; , -•.�a, ,,,t.,,« . :.r- .: -. .r ,' 4k { •s .inv^, . .,:^ + e� �.:y,� went ,(.,, rl''c Ir 4 1- IE. elX 'NNvk, ..A., SIt3.. a 15 I_ v. , gX,.:,„ 'a P�' «4,'�E ” y 'M ,I4, Ad! _ -rr _ r: ,,d �n. _e . : .:u a.. ,�, _r , , t y:,:- ar q , "FW'r. ":a. ,/.r•'a; _} J ri , t . ' i W .�n }�, vw+. „v- C,�E Y " �' ' .,N . ^:rurv. f Y x e, :il '" lrl ' rvk, 41'� " ll 4 . X^{Y' . I' n _1 'v ' 'I N t- ! �* x.` l N, rt:' L �I -- L { , Wi,u ¢ .,1.':. A a , .r, 'w - 3 `�'li '4 vrNtivJ'� a F=r n ,l .V^ 61 n 4 I .. ^ ,.. A: i'.. r i.". '.,:.,,v - h'" `NY 'rr `Y1 .,uea"e k3, ,r. ;,�, sF pe �'" :' hi C4 ,I ' t + /.i . r .n. r:'y 1. . - .,p .. ..� ., , p, A ,.rC-,..r 1t,..7.:^. ,^ .f. ,rar . ,, ..ty ,.r av,,. .r" - -'I,� ,C� 4,. Y ..rv , .rt<., 't. ,,I,,A r, r a' . e ., ^ 'r .r : I, ..^7 r ..d., k7[.,'..;u. (,i& ,..:>U 4(�( $n, ::^nP 4 ,xv..'r 'S' I^{ :tA C+ T*x,l - A' "' 4 , o,'. r ,. ..,f-. 1 ,r,.rn., -r. .:Mr' r .1,.!'. ,.,. .I! .:_:v ., d'- J, �,ne B , :[F ,}, n'f. 3}, Y. .4 S, 4+ ," .nd ._1 r'i -� rdt J, `:t. 'I' G h i,r - - "`r: 1' .<:, d a. Vrc-. 't.r.v,A. ! yr- , a. n�r- • i '.tr .5'. t'r .4x;3 . us '!., , f v yy}�{I _ - �' .T:`, ,x - _ :.t. .+rt.. :1 . .,+`kirr"h. A. , h t. _ a �! y . .e:- w7 !,' 1, V' v A 'L ^I 1 �rvyr„r y,, ••a'44,• '.1 4N 417,;f= Y +� r IN ,^^�, y } ,I ,+ : M1A.” +. . e' '� .s l/.,,J'+I." :13 rt - ,.1 . .tY r�A x A 1 ;ir i- �N k-I..t M: f p r l" j:' .>ry5 n a �•i R'"- y . . ..yr, - f ,y, Nr 3'r : IYp.' A 1, A } `�!.3' !.} K r,li W ..� .y }yr 1�q FYI ,ff.r1 o ,.YT Y '..[ .f G' fir': y -„d^�?I;. '; rrw, .4 L,4 G' " ;4 f: n Wild{ r.. a f�'k.r t . e. ,!al, _I y,, ,y ..Y ,t'T I - t":f ",� ., y„A „ .., , r. 'n" r.. .:r9 -. - '. f^. '';F:A Y,. :1 s'r r Y; l '. .. f . , ::H* t 1= .:.-. t IY, N., +e'.,, ,7f N, .�\:7. S't , G, x :9 ': •:. •:'6, 3 w I r 5.. ; . k . r � , n a.: 'I , ,�.I m !„ :., t •+ x�'e: ., „ 7,. ^„ . , ?k,ltak�5 @r „ „he r _. I. , ,,,.:h'z�:r r .tar .f Fl, ' ,. 9 .. ..,, - ....n.,, r , :,..,.. -.. - .::� .r, n ., .-.4., e,,.,,, .,.y- ^ {811, . Atf, ' yti+., , x �'.:; ;;Y "* l}. . . �.,, . . - f , .. e , . ,t iJ 1 ,.f, l 'I G' W -. : ..Thl yt,naY ,�s ,..1 ,d: r� Fa '�YY'r'. L. j k"' q lA:. 1. _ 'I ' . N. .j,T I t.. 1'S, L �.1�1',. t, .rt'k'la..r" aGt 7A .��ry .",a Vrv, '�� i 5 h ..:1 ' -r'. , -:. ,, , rk•,' "9Tf_ ^. U,K.f.,,!,d, I." ,°ryr,, %r-"jk,rl. ' r . ,> s .3 r ,+r_ r 'I a _ "' 'r -�;'", d SC is„ .,+v 't:F, .r.a_.. a .:ry i�Yr .e,dY:a } i` = 4rc, !+Vn . . 'I ^ _ u a I: - .a�'I .-., . x „ n ;r�' . .._ `t, i ',:ryg i,,. xA - y_ ,' . .f rL4.,"�I i ,.+. -1 - 1I I',A= a[;Y, a* <'x'M ' x . ).+- . r { -Ju„ " -'.1 � { ! .�, y-h , I I, -: nR; e zw+ f,: r } r .1,,, ,#' kp T I 9331 A .'1%F fes, N ^4".'hr S l 'Y 3' dt W�V ; A to i , r� „N- r - l _ - wG 9 :, :. : _1 ., 1 1," I t ,I ,r I - i 4r A " 4 n I, i "sr , i t _ u "XI I a` , 'a ..3 1 ,t �, ::» _ , '?r,,G„ .'l, ? fi,,.1 ,f ."-yy.y A a} 5".a ;;i e .t i at..:° 'v Aa'C'"" ,Y ,,x,. , - 1.1,M !, !+ :s�J :� _ a7- k , ,.'.. :_ r 16 afJ,,7 " �I t#',AI fr It`H:r R'l xx l:�. x i;..', r �}p4�y} r 'Ss ., ti\. _ _ �: l'C al r t ask _ } _ r 1 i:, l Hf41 t "fib .�;Inl£ - ax_'"•ty. ,1 C f , i� l � „ . - .iI . �'l - 1 . .ii 7' J r Al j is v !xT'I!} s 'r ? I _ -!,l ,4 � .;5,, f - Y I`Mr f .' IW :Vti r r. ^`:V•L" I ,. - _ .:;s.r•.-...---, I .„ ;, r i', T Yr :r`•4t rt 3t•, s r - .J7'' I r -Q eta ' ''M ' ," + w v x . � V. ry:� I ';.Y ,,) i_w ,I tt Y - r ! a _ .r r 4's'h.:^:v . 1:1., re 11n,1 ' f �r�, O {z - \ r 1 r 5yi :'•vf� s n ti•tl" " by e°,Nl d r h'�f1'� >!• ? i`r r , Ik,,,. �i I' - , Gt '�h -1 x Y 4 rf,N II i V'rys .-'fill: Rr4G�_ d '1 r. '�.''Y ': • d' k • I _�:4 '-v� v ' r,' '. , ,r, ' �j�,d_I ,d -+ Yrt rtriY!! - i , I - C41 .,may } f N _i Y, I A IC t t$ V". !qr x j f �� P ww N D'7 d441i' i t,-� ' i ' . , 1.," •i I, . d'Y'1 , , I� ,: r' v A : ^ C�-, t i0 1 - YI V - _ _ R AY : f vl Y '.:r 8 1 r - ? k: . 1 rr ti C f „ „ j� r } r r e'; n Fv^3 h +y o v I . ' +` . , i �./ - �,w\ , P r 5 v Ft ,P tAlr } ,I � n X19 T y I�'�. _ Q�i.N' G " x ♦ - r^i 1 r v _ I,. - y 1 `fi, . � .� 1 . J -'f. �l . . 4 S .. 'I , r _ x Lv> i.. i f t _ �, I. \- , ,+ d �r _ "q, I'It f 1 e- , d R 1 i ' S,. ,f' I ° �' ., 'ry � 1 x n - "G . , i . b .f: _ :ir i _ _ r J - Q :u ~x 1 hT�iv .!^ } , t_ , I Tr tr-r;A I �. e tl �az:4u , s 1�k4" i1�' �` _ �'G _ �(YI} ��'}' i'� �' „Otic . '..d 'r":,,,,, {•Frim_ a, "" + A :x _ Nx,� �l . O; Ir j3 - - �✓J - - 4 t' ! A 1 �`, S "*rtl �re t'r, IA t n rr ' „t " �� �'� , ��� - - G� .C. - h G J Ia . J h 1; �`YbtlS e'T 1' � . . - _ I } I r 11 � 'pr If 'u7f1.I ,' L .r tv. ' - - . /� - fi, j[��,I� n, -I, 3 tA�. s/� I 4 V Yr` �t r J tIIIT 9 YTS ., i z�• s,. r.Trw:' , `a % "��)%, I' I r �4 ti " :, _._µIi n f d 'q x) r 5"' �f r c 1 t V r . �l1 I' Y -, i rs i:' rr f t . . : 1 I A ! f ,I C s r X, . _ 1 }u V +' • I all ;.; '- n:", ' 7 r r 4 r I r ,e:] - V f rµi' V riA T .} r tt ani, I 'M1Ap i °' r r r I - QOQi I � y ,,A 1 N J! - s A. .,t ,r ri Ifd s' �' :A{' tr !t ` re �j�, " _ / , .W 14 "v; JAI � !{r -I`�' mf v p4 1 ;h f.,e rt T c.d i } M1j - n _ JFw qv 9 e Y E t § , n, F r y 1 - I r .: Wr �rt. w " n Yell 411 hyxv �' wu. t, f yiY, 1 , i I : U'l, "I r i . r z, . 7 , �', _ , c �.h,'Y � t<r ;.I °` - ,,, . wz �A ff i�yt'': r+"k'r9 r. cf41 ;k �`"�i * 'I,yl k r°S�II'� N rri+ 'rad 11 1( ' ; 1 , Q, .I,' f . } e',r1. . �t i1 ', S" , rt-.Ia I.. ' "rf3'!yy- 'h;' r ip I , ` l . ;—V . {l..l, . ":d r' 1' �, a. - ! 1 'l' T ':�1x,' f , n „r da:x'?i . 4'}•,kr':rx.; R - I �" - fi' ,; rd ' '�""v '� 'G I"' l >k .;A r c0., ,' A'1'n I-L,t r m :,.. � ' --yy ti'i - k(i r J :19 �� < � xV`JYµ .:Ge. ; r6t M! I IR kr_ "f, v� 'p<, Mr " «'e' * I ,I." 1:8-„r2a', }rti!' r ,,tiiM1,w , eR..�`1 �r'v4'ral9 itf+ rl - -'¢ - - : , r .) ',4 G` .� ,-.t 'Cf? il ' A G,y”- t 9. �, A l.`v } - �l,.l a . .tit t , I : "V, I.bt A}"i ri„"I 't: , a"7rvyn *"1e.4�':" .} r , 5 uIv lx�try -4nY r-1' JJt x - x.,/' � .`^ _ �y` �}}Y{���, ,yy ,/rte� ° '. � . YI -�':'' MA ' x,te. l.l 'a 'Fi a'#�^C r, tlrt,T",y :;I r alyt r' . d .':CC` v IL I'� 1 r .V .,��„ 4 �-=PIk t ' I, t, �,'r �, +" , :irv? .� 5 ,,.,,:n, il�,a ri.. v,ry a!"i rn, ; ,`a;' wa2N { ,,,t f 1}_4 r r A n l: I .:l, +rf *•T �y.' ! ! h r. Y 1 / ,k _ _ r, ,1 r:I' v , , ! R ',..lV"F. �,1: .n 'r .Y' I ,.!.)rvl.,f;:f"�''i` d9'y, ::ui',rr�, -0 _ tr_ ' Is "�j �, '-, ..,� w ,; :a ! `,Ts+ r -' ._ a;... :*c . 1. w Frt. �'�I, � c�4 .:., r=. sa,tw . x, . 4 . ;��i .+ _ i ,s., .i: a:u . A f7 '.4, ! a d„ 3,, r , :Rt� :t3 r x _'L]' '�, :,-r , :a.•` n ^1 -N2x „r�rW °"4 d e. y JI. •u 1 �. � Y ' ,.,..n ,,- .a 1 :. 11,`t , " FAr b e. '..f: . ,:., c,. v ,i „� .< ...r,.l :! fBa=”' 1 ', 4N 4 V liT : .:Y '4 . .' f�' .,,.v. Jrfi . .a,.,. t,•r. .il� faa,.,,, m„ ry d.rN, "4 :1 v. M1y ,,,. 4r 1-d :MI, - ., F.: 4'* ,1 r �l,L.. :4 <' "r, "''x .P ut , y� .n}t. .f, }'L% 4n1. "i va'U ! 'k4 aYf' 111 _ Ir .:. t'r 'I . ,,, 1 " -'r..., _ . >A. k",. �. ;� ay5 n„„ :.-i 'ra^ ,^t; ; 1r 4'nr,,.._ k.. i : -, zl - .. Y.. F, �A. �?,p'}. r k,'Si i p r.#( f'1 [ Y" 4' -�( <f W, is y i. r 1 - .L h ,M .1 . 5 'R. Y`f'la' ',r=,1; �Y r u',1 t. �c'.V' ,v9' -4.p .r'. a i_'r:,r:; Yi., Yt i a 7 ;y,: 1 'i.,F, t .;,'"�1- w, ,•4r _.1 %; .i'- 3 i :Y r' 4-, ru x. 4.- .. sG " w _ :; 'h`,x , .. .. , .r,n '•}� "1^a. '1 _, •.r<gx` y v .; .I ' l.'^ 'ri . fK;. IV T , l;._ 1. U .S. , Y :QlIt .+ . N4 ,JI _ n4 yv::, 1✓d a,a"V'xr,:.�, "H°�».ayih•�` S2"n^r`:' rr Ir y Y 1^ ' 4. w, » •:u p+,I ';, )"{r r.t .,Sy y - - }:,'I ,,, ,I .-i� r.'- - R . Ay.. #x. it ,rA '� ,. Tp.ir,... `ro r ,.a`3, ,., S;''" 'Il' M f1 t0 r, ,, „ � : _ —Z— ',':� '1;1 inn ^t1_e, ]' 3,. *t:: .hr ,4 }M. t: Ai y: ,{ ) Yr2ry. t' ': 4w*t f”` `-a^ . 'v"� �4 , 1i51 i , f '.I `k,i .fes- pt: r r . ,.t b ,:Y^�e r 'tHiv ,$ fn pp`?3,fx ..A: ..b�` t -'p, �:. , ,"l.'., - : .. y/ _ 7EC xr, o-,. ✓ .I' .'r : .1il 'f..( . '': I' dr,S' r ! '_ xt ). s, h "L 4� PI rr " ,, .-•. .In, "�.'d'• In., f k a' � r •PIu ( ) -f I 4. r=: .I „ .} t' :11� .}, ,vr ,. d . r,, F 1 A . ✓nr a.. - , � . 1 .'p-r r I';rA ,r Y . .'� ^ .',. :yn, +' Ve 4.4. , 1's, 'a_r "'' .,,1 darvl .,.'., .n, h 3 .I "1 '-^Sy ,rk J :fir .' .r 1;: h "` f N- I, n , I,A :LI= 6r ,,.'M° ^ ,x ,,y ,+m�! .0 1 }S ',-a'', Yt4p f �. ,r,1 yu 4v r "'''.fin t w, t :: , . .,G r,,;,. ;h, I : '< _ ' „1� lc ;ry .�. tl ,rS ;,int,�.'L:11" :cva\ r °a:.i t'f .� -rta:[. :# "' �44y ,w ry rtr�- Mf c..'4 -I, U+ ' r14F i r ryJ: 1`MF.,O0�� ��dgy�.'�kl 5 ,,6�ry, ':a, S i e!S' -1 S, x r 4^ 7 �r r.: `,'. Sid S ,i°: I,bi „N',:d '? .. r..da`w,h"iR'dtJ�V'= _ 1.- kr. _ i S �, .,v,lrc , , t,k, f �, P ,y}V F> , h ',�% ', � , a r� I . ,yr.k'",, ,:,, f.; 'Si. ��' >e. ,,yy La.r�,;J 'E'. and xr',,i., - + r � i-�� , '., �y A W `r 'A' 4J, N- , 9, t" , y� h E± ,a 'flv p '' : : .'„A , .,1 1 , , 1 r i G � 4, M ub ;i u S �•. N ' t xr.t 3' •_4f r i, , t . ., ^^�++. ,v„ .rI } ; qI, t` I,.. { t ,l� ,d: .! � � F.. '�hr f.,°..f" ' '�t,lk� A *Y,N "Mr . f I�,..3'i " .q , .r`�” ..$;r„, r`, r,A@, d 1r . , rp . lE�} ([]� f M .,,, .,Yw, . ?,d, py .,.._ ,f .<: #r. u Nr, ,F+ . - . r ,:. N .., tr. :` a.. C I - . ' =,.k r pCr. �'r ;^ . .I _ tl H'., YY. , I,s a9 ,4ary \;. ,w; p 1 { .f� .f •e 1ev d ! ,nvE. :.Yrt . n a:41 fi, . ...' f i,. I ,1 51A4 - YIfI -q L}{-� L++yy g, .IF �FfY :Y 4: L. f 1q pJf 1 fi ' f+: Il. _ ' rf ' "I. t �' ,f' . A'd,''I d„ F' ">� 'IY F- "Y •=N;x. �,4 '=q ::Yat : V .i ^. w r t ' v `e , � � . r . n, ';;G,r"gr .5 .,, ,9"'`' N .Jf,c _." n a _1 i4 I ! t • �' -k 'L" fll'y, :w , r1 , , ;.' ',. G }-�. v'r .r '52.4 '�' _- s , ... .' ^ , , ,, , .g } , '� Y" s•sry; f , ,T"Sr :ml Ynr =`C a E', rI -rY'. 1 11- - „a. ', 4" r, _ `.� „;. t;,, t ,v �7 QI iv a* .4 >y!}4 ;"`U? r xi:n' ) . r .'W' - - " i' I h• t '. s- . v K. _ ie �v,l' .Es r^,. „�i' ia^ ;: nv . e¢ fk ,:( . . )) '. :,. w art. .tr N ,'ry z' m !X 1"+ ' 1 • r Y „*�,Ll:l J}*e ea �) tL?�yg�E4 It ��c I n" _ A , - .. nu 'f �¢ Y. '„1' i,:: '!Y. :.':: 5 . '„g1 _ A'Vi ', _ F :': r L ,k`., '.gull "'A M`.Y,CY' fl. .e ,li _ S 3' � . - - .. ' .-,,, - ". , i . :(.1� e t•r ;,, I-H1. 't° :m, { r. m.,Ni 4v, itt- -, n ,r.,�.:F'” "fv .,,.+ .ua .4 r, F t' 'I' _ I� t _ d HiCr;, a. 7e .�� ' rt :, Ilp s., # lr, ?dr wv , ,�'r* 1 - x . � . " I . ...1 . :. . .,,1 r- N "'.< I +, . -1," -k x'a4'�ry} t .r+ s. k1?;- t9v.. - } 'Y,-�r,fi r -- - DO' d ,I„ ,. , ' -: '4;, v,,:a e"1 , ;n 1 rn'fY. � s o '"ffw`,v a r1 `, . -vf_> w.i's'il r'_I., v'�r :" ''u , '' 'Y -, ;,- ,+ , ..... : .. ,- '« :5 ry , r'< a . ,,.:. a }: ,1. 1: ,w '"�, . h. a a"``' ,r S . i ' t - -, ... I : :N, �I, :,.,= a+, Y a( . .r : t d ', n..`a ,,, r :,e.. ,+N ,ki ,r Ifi.g.-• .�b +13-., „ - >_ ". ,am '9. ':G' : iJ t' .,v: IR,.!. r r)z+'i .,_ : 1a �WrS,'YM.,6 .n: f,„' :r =f a.. - , Y ^`F,','£ „r,a,J- Y , .A .r. , 164, .rt F5 r Y..3 = 6 _ _ J I u t l ,.h. .t 1I ro a vN,n {, 7` kr ,��n x I'. , ” I' _ furl • .i' I e a: ':H .ok. { Jt= ,. -..x tt,4^, .'.a , N.w ^ � t.x, . GS .9" "� '� -;.I 1 r"� - . . : ,, .,r e :,a, r :.d . ; ti , -, �,y ,c . 1 „"S'1Iy .OM1 ,r � ;fi^ 14,rtr 3,. ? r. rr, - y_ 'I, ,ry ,1 .. 5,' . . ..ayr1Tl+,,. . yv •,.I L,, °° ��1 '• wtr vq f I .. 1 1r - n' r 'v , 0y } , ,.:,. :- „ ak ,. 0 "..,,. ML '., -v YAG - , , 4 . r?1v,,. .F r,f.,, 3 ., . �. ,I d r�ri .d. _ � �I, z -,.: - .. , _ ,r: , . - 1 1, 1 . '... „ ,.�.r =- 'icy r:, . ai '.. 'rr .' �,r , .f ?, N§, r v ,i {, .., p ' ,x 1 : Y' z.. a. . r - 1 t r f. �' h' a _ ry :.r?' I e I "F-�'i7 r,rv4 i 'f k, ^G ,'s'�r'. A n- i 11 T t r. 't7'Rw 'r " '6- ':,_.- 1C _ h" ,,.,t :P ?Lr. !v.}.,.: .Y_iw„n�. .'«19rr,., „ 9 :'�f.r } "r y '1 • .r '.:. . r ,. .-I -r 1 ^ . ".. 4 M .n•- ,.^%•+ x. rq-r`., °'. ,. tr, x a -k. va vy, :;;,' q , I, : -.. Y. -4,_ µ. „ , L.-I , .T ..r; M1i a. . i. f ,1L:,t+1 a 1 f; , . , , ;, f ., . . � } �. : i: :, '.” l v , I ., fl h ,x-n•J .x k.. ,L .<„ .,, d -,I .G 1.�.;.rj�� {;v. .�h +�Lx L, 4, "G ,y e _ a, ..1 p 1 - ar 1 ., L,:tfir 'YI_„ Ian, _.,Y:UCf, �,„ I�" , �,W :_ 1, x 4,y 4 N r<s .+ . .,.,, r .Y •, , It. 1 lr ,< of}„ l ",p•.,'� ^ - (r ,i x.' a::.v .nt: 4 xl r ,'Y. .,l•I �- ' pF' . . , ,�1 ,. 1 , I. ;I ..,, � L , L „ , +x t ,Wb, 3 ,. ' . e, ^ .. •r , ""e rvll,l . I -,. 'a ; - . ,I ' - r ,. ^ u w dit 1: � x ,ai. , ' I,a" .b- t .,;o n, t„ , , {,r7, - ,,,. i, a e ux ' . 4, H ly ,�” ...b 1 g.G.._ 4 . '4-v als ”, Y -ilam z" +, .l w, .} ..- IIti 1 - e ' .`Fra i, t. ,,o, {� P+, A. ' .i}, I„ ,�j*''��. '1- v:4+ - `i ,y, 1{ , 'J:;�w `u': ,:f5 1 1*y .. aG.p. ,"y+ I,'Y 1'f, I84i _ )) f _ r :qy fd - ,} r"n: � , . . ':+ 2'r 1 f - f', J , .,:w 4r . .`A¢., . ! i , s�',( ..?H, yf _.+wa:, r! I 'Il: � n,4z r - fI }: k 1 x M,aF:_ xht . 'hfi 1 ' *:r } `5^'• yi /� vIr y _ 1 _ -a:, ., _ E Y, 1 � ' -E .,,'`R.n:- .i It ` ,54 Y,, hex :1F d .•"N 4 '-Mi. 'Ae,N 151 - I „rr t: :fru 'N 4.'i M. -;1 �f. f T 4 ry'•, q v M r "y„ :- . ,tett f , .I ,, °,N Iii .r ° fi v ': ,� ':d, 4 y,,,J,'N„ ';751 - '„a� yx :?k';,:, ';,',y- [ i.. C, !",3f" ':; C^i'i�hN-1 ire F N rv4,= , a!f s. 6 ,.d, S^' r $ ...G . .y 7' , k l qq - 5 M { C - ri'. Ya .i r I it T �7 --a:`. h '+' :ry t;l.". 4�� V kl; k : 4 t �, : ' :r1{' - + f $ A !n .3#.' yr .c r --�"r ':tYf,- F15 •I+. rv"F I ' n d1- ;( y, t. g fir, 4Y4 A T, " I " r a J .' a; a 1 A 1 1 �Y a ”, °^' ; '4,v of C:I'+3 5 n_t,o Ni' .:F, l " I 1 .,1..� _ - - - _ _ a �b :y 1I �I'y11 r,� Py'A?,.r ,np4,rl '.v.> i+ h _ r ' '' j ,rl M [ (E { ih 1,� F' 1'4' 1 1 Af, 4 : _ d i. �. a }Y .SM _ ..I.. r rM1.! a t Oro w t '.,;.hq .k t :,� - "-"j ': n I y 3 3 k ::� 4 .L 4 f N ,i� _,I I ' . 'r" r l . :{ "l,il > 'hN xi" 1,rv4 13�[ °f s, r y r x[ t +. _ - e . . ! M v r :r " ",_d' r .,.,,�.r ;e v a ' -, ""`f t� ., I, 1 'v.al ✓'J,.e;<I; o �iw 1 v' �I N "N Pl v .. L, ,. 4: ,.r L , ,. } ., ",1 { I -.,.r,. , A ,. .,., n :, I `tx _ 12i^• 19 sr, F'F, rT A x} i Mrl - :.i;^Y 1iUn' F ',;�t r 11 is sA t 1 ,'�n 7, r,, , ri ' r _s G � fr i7,t kzk r=1 i. - n:r : ,, ' 'AT --,F,;=' f' ";11. " -r^ t I' '', «,, r•, yl r.. i�'S, .4 '� "n' 'd' 7 v f.� a i:,., '! I, r - r rr _ y -..:I , 'r , F^' r5 dljr,x . .0 fdNI _ P' - d 5 , a'• _ ,-r - . - - ,..I, l', ei J4 `'t(D .rM ,b' }d '>b t` .k. : I'. "1 < 4 1 ::LBr r: !,+.. r '✓r'a W + -: ',Ry x t a c'. ,� _ },"u ,<1'. r'�. , I," + k, d=,r'-YI, ,?xv,s ,•: G P' ,a n t�'C': , _ r - I;.;g :y�� x r 'A ,N' f"" r,t 16 Il L �' K 'I Frr - " .I d' Omrla�l ervr,4ad_.AG:rw.w+,kx - d' k.,., A' r... _I „ w� :- . , � ��.d r „i• # _� rI � ,J�.: '.r � e .•,. . � a, .�, , .. . . . „ -r r _ ,. .. ��y: ..w' y e s,,.au .:... ar..u,Yx .L.. w:i e:d'.• .d,..__. .rA _,C-_,. t'.i _ ,o-Y vY,afi v6` ' i .,:- .1.. .r ,,.del_ AFu . i., E . '" Y . �. .G' _ _ I ILL- ll 11 'e t r - - - - rI , :?' _ I _ - y' - , '" �, - - - „ ., 1 • _ :,� } - � cY - -YE'. 1 -. . . - , f . . ;r "ILL ' I Ii . . _ I I - `I I , 'i . ,,� ' i 'I I � � .II r"'I I, y i „ a 4 .bI I, r 'A I Y' '4 ?!,,:r yM t§N 4tlx.'.ri't1.,^^*r 4� " �*R "I' "l II'lli A} k� _ " _ _ Ir _ y rl , :. .Mi 1 . , , ' .� ' .. , n �I . - � I, ^ - '.f ., _ }',: - . , ., i ., 1 ,I • „I r _ i _I 1 . , '' �„ _ I . 1 '7 .. - . - - - t Or I . - I ' _ . . II l _ $'1 - ` `��� "i€ - ., _ - .. S iw t.yf}4 1 '4j - - I - , N �1. - �. WII -� ,, Y tar k � J - _ . - - I , : : _ r �. I _ _ e 1, r - ^ • ✓ w ear '�.,� 1 - Y ^ v„ '�: _ . 5. (a. , 'S '� I. "(' ...P 'ii .. AA _ r IF I } I P¢' � 'n.l# 4 '�9} }.� L y M1 e 4 V r Y y 4 X IF _ V+ [„ Y 9 S k II y r. r i i `An - r1 t f vy r t J� e '' l7rtl„p, ]9 F,., ! 'i,d N kI i I'll I V I J 1 4 It r 5 ,{: V "„ V V 1'M1 3 A ! b Y r ,prvi :: , I .l [L: i r r 4 X !, :I r Y : , c a b A F , ^r ,C m'.,-I, I' 5C I,.+ Y I . �;•' 4 _ F 11 y fi 1l 7 1 + 5 S 1 €, I .r 4 '{ - t I fi' r b Ill d ! } � '� Ilt 'i A a ,m .,,.r 'e-f'�t r 1 .}r! } , n itl ley) 9'f' I� - } e 3 1 'n:4 IIv , '3 _ - d.is F .!. { I .l r, rM S I�.+; ,I fI, I -s1 I y },- { 4 t E rn r m1k y,;. 1n T Y+'ti, I r ^� j 7?/ I + ;A ,W : IrI k,-'� �r'1 it .' 9! _ § ,y - I I - _ r - r '� Ijr ' e 'ksl .;I I l-Ir.%: '' „_I� i ,1,' .k '.S1,_ , Y- 1 5' ,f '�'i�} 1' 'rt 1.„ �.,- M_' [I I li -: i i .�y j h I - a 'I : { A rp rl II: v v! "t, 'F ', ! » d i w ,r,*'?,_!'N r % S II.I r I ,a''P.:; " f i at,I. " :�'`!� S 1 vbr„'rt, Yft r Ear, :YC D!'�I�A* x " Y� I .!14 it :A..l + ..I K '.a! u i f ",; r- � 'L ':, , „µ .;Iti';, Y 1I I iV; yx v 1 fi w , Y rthl r s a wP `i.} i r 't J• KY I' !I.' }t a k4t „ ,. C:; 1 ra i I 'I.,1 ::'I w,,.'YXf '."' . r,t:t' Psi Lfvw y,. { } .H '">' d1 it I .r ; 'ti , •,4. >< I +Y .J `k+ e� Yr:', ' vi'r U a III,,1'til i�I ;F, !� i�f _ :"k 1 r �,i. r _ '} 'day 'wi 10 F 'I ff-I—l 1 Y 11 r ,I - Hi1,. i4 I : I > `.,? 1 Paw 4. arS I ; 5M1 ! k, ' IF f, IPI. : F' nf,g .- Tttt S '•'r lard, I., o „ / i + ,7 1 i° 'e' , , _ 'r�. y r : !. ,� r' ;�! t rw'✓e�s,t ri,,�, x l t,,�},"It`,1 ,:._r s,� C t n` 6A j'ot? i ,k klrIi7r . 'fii m;{Il e if ' 4 a ,Pty1 �r +'I{1f1( P zl u .`i" L Ak I�t fl.. k , ' .W°d ((I. .�'t,., '. _ a,, I 4 ;...,. la' T.P,'s ;. I "I"' F.N,,,I.'I 11 _S b 't,a Y', x ,i,._ [ 7. 1, a" 1'Ta .5W'ry k 44 '! . J Y N Y{ I, .1{y e" A r i"x.n lir I -'I! „ P ,-', Y tri': '+s. +;h I, F, W F hl_. .'li m , a : +' l -' ;V ,�+`'S;."tl,..N '' :7i""-rIl"I� E-`:' t_aM1 TYr a '. a'..:r': � N�Y .ry ,.#•, r tfy n.1; 44 A'I`L 11 �.l I;' a Z k n / °`ky Y 1 .4'`;F' ' `^r `4 b„4 b 4-Sd+,} n r. t. I'Yr,y:,': I 'i L'.,:i, b - :I'r .:'$rlr,E I� , yld i.i M :',}' .LY"+L. I. j '.tl'u'd'�'.-` r V..., r d S.F. I r : ,l: I ,I4a„' i `:i ' wM . ,.s i[�I . 'y i'5'�ll t -,; : O / " p 9 � � 0= <L � m F - - - f , - Ort•�v �h .0 t3T 3 05/SOX h Q vn - / O KEY MAP SCALE 1 " a 600 - � N u'0 0 0 ` - - -- - - - - - - - - - g 930 OT 5 � ' . . o 1 4t;RE9 1471. 00' 0 p�tEW N 0 gym_ 7+ Q ({'lg <r yb fr 9�p{r` 481.p gam - oot _ P4oPoSED- l a Z A -° 4 ss ' s " VAR �J q \b°m planlo" . JF u / V/� / hk m 30 50 4Z2.29p� 50° E �i `C 0 _ - _ _ ` n c i �_ mrd- - W • - J - �- -�.a t ; - S'. 3314 I bl _ -(IT. _. 32- IT 4fi T(T_ � 10 �_ - \m - - - _ -+ .t,n _ °'0cs� - - - d • _ J I } a °f� - - - - - - - - - - _- - - , 8 \ A +a ar p4.00- ,; . - .. --. - < r o N \ - --, _F�, . 1 - - - : (o. - ..f• .moi - . . - - _ -- )B<z - er - - - r `: `_ --- - - - + - ! /� - -( - - - - - - - - - ` t`•( 3. a 1 gacl < .�r405r? � - /' - � . _ :, _- . •,.,; .:- ' . ' ' -- , - _� r _ - - - � - - _ - - _ - � o � \ C 3 :t _.. � '.; / SKETCH PLAN -FC1R �_- _,' ` -+` _ . - - - - - - - - - !S` -�:S_ - _ _ - C t- >b p py - � t, _- , _• ,_ ,r .- - . . -. 136 � ,'- ,., _ _ ' .L'+" 1 tTU'iI'f� T(kWN OFT SflU. THttiD . - - - , . SUFFOLK CQUNTY - N.Y. I000 - ?95 - 01 03 - - - TOTAL AREA 47-0520 A C E t I ,_ \ - _ .- .. l r " 0 - - - fDTAC_ AREA= 47.0520 „A REQ = _ � - 1. e 2 n ` � :' _ � SCALE I - tOU -,, - N.- ZONtN6 DFv� Tt /CT:. A80 9EACH AREA- tt:93 `' ' G . ly j v� # rA. - _ - - ct+ac� arsr cr: .s -_ � .1 . � - - � -- � - - S L R! - - - - - - _x ,22 �-�A�'RES_ - - - - - - - - -- _ - - - - - - -- - _ - - - s E:R D ! t HOla 4T. � - ` - BA FRE DISTRICT :� GU�G - UE Ft • � ( (j ` e x - _ l ' Std S 46.122 4356 - 0490745£Y - FT -x 0_8$x -/6759 S0. FT. t F� Q_ QA o 1 / : � :. � - ' ' ' . _ •-z/ a - F 259180D00� 2fl-LOTS- ISO Z - - DWNER & DEVELOPER sorHoo-ro4 �-_� - - -Q W - !( ANTHONY- At{PERTF AREA OF OPEN SP } 4GE- t5 ._ACRES __. / - \o BOX 149 _ N \ ; r� \ - - .. .' - SHIRLEY. N.Y. 11967 �p�AaosG v - m - m 400 -w O ELEVATIONS AND CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCE0 TO; - _ _ - _ - _ - - '- �y_'1� - ' - - _ � _ - N.Y.3.AEAK- SEA- LEVEC _LIC: NQ_4$6f8 - _-- - - - GIV 1 - _ PECOMfC SURVEYORS_' -9 EN6 tNEER$ _ tP. C_ - - - - (516) 765 '-5020, - - - - - - - _ - - - - -- - _ - - - - _ • - P. 0.- Box 909 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD , N. Y. 14971 - - =- - - - - - -- - - nr - lar A - ' 0 °lO m i s° s m ¢Kp Q .fir Y p m O 0*- � iO E36 Yf N F \ p5 fry m 1373 4Y° ♦a ,n lstK � tD ` ' m u1 4 / / I � ( 1S ` ry - E. \ e° ° 07 5 i I ACRES 1a7100 KEY- _MAPpry. OUNDVIEW J SCALE 1 1000 �(Y B !_ 415 c m O F p SPA ( f f 9°` 4 c••'�--`` °. n _ W _ a `•C -� OpJO Sp 5 = 65 7 i l8 n P s A /Z�J _ — y mpn f /� "a- 30° 5 422. 20 ©� t 9 N` B�j.fi a I y 2p rr�+� t 50,. E . \\ jg5 �� 1 O *l - 43000 - c\1 P6 •� �r � - 1� ° 17� 10 N- It: 2 WUW� T+ N n O ss e. i J9 Y N as }n� / / a6 f - I 59 G + X50 1264 + 16 Fr;c F1 - — - - 1 qoa' \ \1 .F" urn' /3 \ it 2o0 / o ' I \ ZS' 7 59mOn \ 16 rTi �,� \ \ 195= m NNP , s' + ms / "d 32° 09 sY \ \R D ie / r+. " I 1 _ , - ".� o00 \ ao / /� (-� A \ 2 y i ' 773' g2 .n o w \ I , md - 1 I 15 F f ,n �i e \ Q„s c L F 54 t s / m ° e 4o,moo s9 N 2o2 \ %_j5 ra, 190 _ \ g +Q 4o1 p0� - 9s / 1� tt 1 + Q o�\p � oo SQ.�7- N ec N o I \ m \ \ \ - at H \ mooQ, ,450 ,b P\O 5 z.=ZS, - 4 FI, 0 s - SKETCH PLAN FOR � 1 - \ b�� ,�� a �� Pa Ri 7p ` , �` a VINEYARD VIEW ESTATES 32° a fi IQ E 1`�` `\ \ , \ \4�b\� I \\ /' - \l II / �o,i �R��a� 1 v \ 5 \+ hO�SQ �' \ 2o5�%r Z° 30 10 � W // } E aN a a !may\r \ s \. 6 4 16500 _ _ N 3 AT MATTI TUCK 56 /p . o / r m w \ , 31. 70 m - 1 50' Ia - 6 s TOWN OF SOUTHOLD e l \ \ 321y4ifnc \M \\ ,o q_ .- \ 7 �� �( Oop SQ. F ¢ ,qa 1° b1�_ \ a I F>t SUFFOLK COUNTY N. Y. 1000 - 095 - 01 - 03 TOTAL AREA = 47. 0520 ACRES — m , 1 � N 5p / � A901F TOTAL AREA= 47.0520 ACRES + SCALE I = 100 Z 5 a r 1 \ \ �\ \` ; \ s \ $ \w - l a o 59 '— _ I m _ n m I I 1- \ T t �\ °' ��i p0 I 190'= ,p0° W. s ,`, I 1 e I I \ 3l000s '�. t \-N \ sdt y 31° 3z BEACH AREA= 0.93 ACRES A416 g /98-7 1 �'�� \a moi ., ti N. ZONING DISTRICT: A80 , sy Ia / P e R SCHOOL DISTRICT: • 9 46.122 ACRES MAR, 2a, /989 1 a o \ \ rl fp 06,0 47. e5 13AE FIRE DISTRICT : CUTCHOGUE 19 1347 OSE H 46:122x43560= 2009074S0. FT. x 0.80= 1607259 SO. FT. _ / R Z \ ; l l cxA1- // '' \\ \ \ / N I O I F OWNER b DEVELOPER 1607259/80000= 20 LOTS M. A. G T. CORP. AREA OF OPEN SPACE= 15 ACRES± BOX 149 N `` ueo���T -� - \ �11 \ O SHIRLEY, N.Y. 11967 c I \\ _ \ \ \ \ \ �a _ v- - - OL DS m . \ and n W N.Y.S. LIC. NO 49618 4040 1 b - I �' 1 - O 1 1 ` N. ` ELEVATIONS AND CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO ,\N Y. MEAN SEA LEVEL VEYORS d ENGINEERS P. C. 'v^^�. °- ays�s � (51 - 5020 3/9/e9 P. O. Box 909 An/ralae MAIN ROAD s/is�ee .P<wsio^ SOUTHOLD , N Y. 11971 85 - 185 A I yOJ O W 45 p N m Q Q N 1373 0 5 /br°en�t N ST1 C s I o i ° 07 50' E 1 N a >, g, 3 3 Z = KEY MAP 9ti• jq71 . p0 S / za 2 sty 4B 5 \ L)7 J ZI 3 Z Ott SCALE 1 �� = 1000 - - � _ � ,u > IEBER °'r n e 4 T gGHR ST, — i s Rg5 EAST Kg N Y h1 w o — C� _ _ S�A /�� / fr Fra \a �,� O Qz YOR ' (' ° r n ° u NEW 6 / I>5 ° r A� ° r _ — O �f \ N 001 Q - 5? b 1 ® m pa5p s / 20 � _ _ - - ' - 95 °✓p oNr O1 rp PRO /-/.✓F/ A h mon 104 4 � q{o A C ti {na 5 lo; ' oa .FI f O,• E . ` \\2 ry of ,�0 < mnn \ \ \24"0 422.29 /N 30g5 6Q 83, E 33° 14 5 I , '900 m s�Uy IL > - r i � 1^d I \ ea Lor �� gyp+ N. 32rn -- \ Gor 11 �/".7� 15 S9 p? i 1 64 _ 150 goo t 1\ �^"l � ♦tl �1��D N 5 t /75'f � � s 4t [ �s // z / 7 46 - 3' r' or f2 Op S4 ° `° , 1.1 004 lv \ 17 f at / ,} /'j owl \ \\ Y� \ 1 m © o000 + 8t 32O9 , p0 00 0 NOn \/s- F,5P �VwrdG 91 h - — I r / 773 � -= 164 _ 111`1 1?� r;g., 3.aM T •l m\ \S \ 1nN , \ \ �4O \ ! y' 175 Opo 10 \ Q=zs8 04 /o6a'�� r cr N 221° /oo SKETCH PLAN FOR R io VINEYARD VIEW ESTATESt5o g -• -. oo ¢ t r - AT MATTITUCK \ .Fri 4A \ : by \ �0, 8/ " o \� \\\, Q �;� ` 45 _ C o \ /� y ® °¢ + 831. 70 was TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY N. Y. Vi Z 1 m 1 \� 1 e s,s N \`-1 e a / q 0 ® Ao ° 8/ + 1000 - 095 - Of - 03 O 1' !� 1 1 \ \ \ \° � o a� �� { 50 b TOTAL AREA = 47. 0520 ACRES — I e I I \ \ 1 qoo t \±m ;` sa't /� ® ` // 8 Cyo 99 31n 2'00 N' TOTAL AREA= 47.0520 ACRES SCALE I" = 100' pmpaW in arnJumw •8t fbe wnm N 1 t _ / - 6141,9 1. \ _ g000a N I N , ZONING DISTRICT: A80 BEACH AREA= 0.93 ACRES qvG �n+� � ��w+� � ti' 8 /98-7 0 2/° SCHOOL DISTRICT: 09 46.122 ACRES 1tn L6AdAy *aMe adaLmd >'I 40,60 / g5' MAR, 28 /98 for +udl ,wk7la lir rat-sM. lei ° 47. FIRE DISTRICT : CUTCHOGUE 9 '°(•'/ � \ � c�8 °'= 13 - 7iNn Ar3iw , �t / \ ` 46.122x43560= 2009074SQ. FT. x 0.80= 1607259 SQ- FT: Z 1 1°m °�� \ \ 't ± \�1t \\ \ \ 250 ,! N I 1607259/80000= 20 LOTS Q W m \ 3Id n�E \ ° g OWNER 9 DEVELOPER o �` \ � \ +° b - & OTHER M. A. C T. CORP. 4REA OF OPEN SPACE= 15 ACRES:! \ TER BAERLANE BOX 149 (� I� a 1\ 1 1 \ �\ \\ moo \4K, e 66LTER M RICHES r NY- SHIRLEY, N.Y. 11967 AUG 3 01989 '' C7 1 �� al'1 It r - � CEN s r1 1 ` � 11934 LAND 1 o 5 t °00`h, Z Z 1 n 40' 40" W 2�� t. M�J L9L - vta A111ic 90P O 1 tN 31 1 G"� ?��'�� ELEVATIONS AND CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO '-' -� O / \\ N.Y.S. LIC. NO 49618 MEAN SEA LEVEL * /� r _ 1 1 m a 12-518? N1 Cj� VEYORS 9 ENGINEERS P C. 3/79/899 6 E'Nj 5020 909 rtn%Is/ad MAIN ROAD s/Zs es ,pF ,s � SOUTHOLD NY. 11971 I _ ra -s . _ ._ -,L y..m. r ...y.. .rle . . ., r.. •.. ,•nru m rr nOr rarennn nry •-• • rn • ... ... ... - _ u..+m. ...... . .. ..... ...._ _ -v. _... _ _ — _ _ _ .. __ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ Q h t 3 . 05' 0 KEY MAP _ ,' t �' _ - mss' k � i =x SCALE 1 " = 600 � ,Y - � � - � / l GOT 2 t t4 — , _s 3GOT oosyfr 03,pO� 54 � stig5' ACRES 1411. 00 „ , Gor 5 UNpV1Ew / sq $0 ,QELNARGE GaT l W Fy I1 45: .. stY b °00 4 50, 0 N 0 1� t God �>^rs `�l/ a PAK ora faf 8°'Sv A p f< �'< / 1 `ed © /U25� th - �,1! /O g�I� tl V' `•o - — — \ #r 29S --_ - -- _ _ _ �* `+, ;,�`, \ 29 N•30 3 ( t ' f t S. 14 5 „ \I / /l `01_r a io© ; / /95 $ Mon0"000 ``�r \ 422' _ f n, �. a 50 rte- / , S l' ±� // /,i ' LO W' x 3 1284 ' / 05 �� Y - .� e r / / 71 48` It 3y c i ` - 1 i /t j •\ - L07 W ` N • ;�fsr _ - "- / . 0g• /�5 32-�- N 3. 92. t YIELD MAP FOR t1 $ 30. 05�_ ♦ _ �\ \ -- \ \ /' rl 1 1 iO' _` CF / 1 \ \ /�7`i \ �. � ALIPERTI ESTATES tw II eD vi 1 / a / W IpE1 " 834- tD - ��y A7 MA�'f K v pp �! lB0 TOWN OF 30UTHOLO �N `- \ t\v I k . SUFFOLK COUNTY N. Y - x TOTAL AREA � 47. 0520 ACRES r000 . - oea - of - oa � N `� p,. /6' BOAC . 32 00 ,' Fw � M \ \ \ \ + /• I N. 31 01 SCALE to ■ 100' 85 tAE 154 \ F O SE A AUGUST I, 1988 7- ini, 17 i4, t \ N N � O � '9, /9sB p J o 2oLL7` 3U'1989 +4 i;9uAia� Ad (D \m _ Ea LANA ^ - 1F 31 a 40 40 W e `n r ��s��'' t' MFT2cL9G ELEVATIONS AND CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TOS - r - MEAN SEA LEVEL 0 PECONIC`$2 avgYOROA - • - - - (56) P. - AIN a - __ '_----- $OLTNOLD -_- _ - •';='-_ . - - - - - -, - __. ' .�..- _ � _ _ . .,:e �- _ - _ _ __ _ _ - - - ., _ - - - _ - - _ _ _ •-fit _ 'i 3'jY' "lam ..Y=Tc mut :_ `_,:.. _ .. _ _ _ _ ___ ___ _i � '. � - _ - _ - - � - ! . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - • `-'�'�: � J _tis''TYa+i { t+t KEY MAP 1 ' = 806` Sao - - - - - - _ ' r • OT _y 0 E• OT +� ooO- Gln�y 5 y y FT x,00. y !rte"- •+�,._-' �, , �g IbTi' ooa"s4 R 4D a IX- ' i 1 F f9' _ _ _ Jo a Y S o y // i� . , fi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -/ - OIL . Y Qt 0100 rr O f f - � ` y _ r o 0sI00�t r„ / \ + ` !$ 2 g / / G / - .•- A' � o s4 1 v } O u �i O, , — 'T T y YIE LD MAP FOR '� 7 p RTI ESTATE,5 ° �• �. - ` - R- p'(S �\ ' -� v/ - i + - ! / - , q LIP 1 E It ; I PAS` Ill !,! O \ .� '\ - L ' 1 } / 'M - ` - - \ .r' "`. - 77 i " -- - - - - - „- - - - - k TAM OF ,mak O' Vd S FdIW COii - 1 - _ ' _ T - a h '._ FT � li � .�j �t • \ � 1 _ u• { � / 2,,i . _ l5 - � oo s Ia�� r At > TOTAL AREA ACRF9 = _ E in . � y,� ps �, \ _ / � } N• AUGUST I, 1988 "4_ - IQ o. +1 ' -� ; - \ e �. / a¢'yam t' - - - - , - i' I<.� - • - - OGT. _ \ a,5 \ m \ b> > 85 - - — / 8 1 \ OPOSED 1S , � 4 T' AW - ) PR 0 If moV- " Jf! 1%$9' - Q S i o + 2 0 \ \ e i !{f 1 X11 I `l-9 ELEVATIONS ANO CON LNE�4 +fA#' t!F#€i _ t0i., - - -- ._=s t r - _ - /- Z �• 31 o CIO q0 -41 MEAN SW LEVEL t - Y - _ - . . F. J ♦f 4 ; e.. ___ .. i >`.., , r. a-v. _:- ' . _ - -. ..a — _ : _ _ -•. ,< _ . . '".�e...�a _,. .c..- ' - �' 4� _ '".'_ T 1 dll lV�°e u'1�'d�"rh1.YY. Y. �1Ld \yyP�j 0 5/ N % Q N4 1373.05, ,n m Z u o � KEY MAP Ze5' o =� : r = soo \ SCALE ACRES19 zo 26g' / 15 � AD p7, 50' �O�� ZOO s`7{ . �NOVIEW S. 33 - 115' 4 SO 4.59 / 195 w i QO 3 , 1 i b I �• 0 f BQ, m 1471.00 ' / O, /75 3p0 � F ff.rt•132. 17 10' W 1rlY{� e O IIIW/O -- h ' N - r -Ff 0 59 i v O o Zt % /�5• f`r "L- 1 ACMT SETOFF S�p ft, LOT p'R 0 ,00 9G - 2Qo '9 A 0451. `\\ RAP / - _ 5 7 139.40' \ - 5 1. g4 r / /// N 32' 1T 10' W. . s9� - r p R OL9 Sq. 80`U u - -- -- - The o Sy, 09' p0 W. 773.92, h AURES e \ �p64�50'' - osq SO(,JNOVIEW \ 14- 1 `\ I.' � �, , 0/F c a 1 � 595:44' N/ 57.E UO 32. 30, 10' W. •! SAER g OD YI' - H. ' F w Q�347-62 2 48' 10 �C1 bo G 'SRO 1 / � '\ - = I a 297.2 \ � � •\ ,�', // \' 1 � �' /� - N/0/F h oo v `\ v �' - — f 0 \V b /� 7 P 8U bco,7 I. a p � a 1 31. 3?,' p0, W. �i MAY t 't es' Z its960 YIELD MAP FOR 35, \ w \ ALPER TIES EJ TA TES Recharge Basin Cqpocily Required D 39.8 acres x 43560 sq.' ll: x 0.3 x 0.42 \ ATMATTITUCK = 2/8,455 cu. ff. 00 9./,3 9 \ . , _ - --' /' 5j TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1 r Nt Boa D Recharge Basin, Provided SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y: 86' x 256' x /0' � 220,160 cu. ft. "i . \\ 20\ \ s� 1p49 tk�1 MAIf) q�r' O I N l S7-h�Y9• !� ` 1347,85' D AREA �� BUILDINe ZONE, R e0 8 A-C =452155 acres SCALE 1 = 100 Z MAR 12, 1992 R OWNER - .. \1 f — ° BAE - - PE Ci ( ' GEYORS,, P.C. B. ANTHONY ALIPERTI i 2918.24 ss ROSE' H BOX 149 N 31. 40' 40'2W' N/0/F (SX))?w SNIRLEY, N.Y. 11967 MOWCONTOUR 4INES ARE'REFERENCEp TO MEAN' SEA LEVEL 1 $ cz ROAD Sh/ThW, PLY. A071 Reyrs�o rs/9z . 85- 18 " N � I j — 1 ew4u �lT 1 • \\ m ra I „r _ N4 1373.05 N Z w Z6 KEY MAP � g SCALE' Y'= 600' i pV�EW S. 33, \II S 8U, 2p0 5Y{f - D OUN >s' 10 $ ,• -_- I 344.59' �\ ' 1471 p0. 32' 1T 10" W" WOiF XI v j 1 IS- OT 1 ACMT SETOFF / 5� ib,t - 'i' .� ,t � -' too D 14 82 S. 33"\ 5 / 139.40' , 8i , N. 32' 17, Ip' W. 1 It ?N �t 0°°51.fry S / ,/ . ' / 717.46 - !� 8/, °°° s9. �" .�' ! N. 32* O9 0 c o °o0 59.ftf q ACRE$ c 8 3.92' °1 1 \� 77 VIEW o o \ \\ 1264.50, S9. /O/� $OUN� c ca 1 l \ \ 595.44' 2 S N a 5°opo I� \` OU {f± \ \ " N. 32. 30 j0, w '] 9AER� ` e\ \\ \1 � \\ / / a /// �\I a S I O II �,±; r ' -ag H j0. E. �\ 347.62 \ 1qn ° 049 y9. i S. 32' 46' \ \ \ \\ o ,�P / I N 0 �' �5 ✓' 90/ 1 631.70, ROSE - ' a \ \ \\ gym, ' �� 1 �- (\}. CN 297.24 \ �\ \ \ \ ,\� i(� \� N 11 � oOSy,Ft e°' a N/O/F 00' W 31. 32' LrSL+'6 R OZ I w \ \ \ \ \ 1 ` y 1 D N 70 N \ \ \ 4p m w D 1 � \ \ YIELQ MAP FOR N; / a=I� \ `. \\ , �. - _ No�B to \ NINB BOARD 1"^ T I � l+tl � i , �/ o � �./ ''o- , \ \ `\` \ ALIPERTIES ESTATES1 . D ;� P���l� \ Z \ _ ry 1 d /� \ /9 \ O / 0,:t (p MATTITUCK " ��� tl! v ���/ \ N \v bR�a��9 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ��:— �' 3 ' , . ,' X049.61' D SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 25 \\ \ \ VJ 20 \ h O ff \ AREA 1000 - 95 - 01 - 03 I 1 0 347.85' D 44r ; -45.2155 acres �� B(ALDIN ONE' R B0 a z-c C I 1 i'b , \ / SCALE: 1 - 100 Z 1 ' MAR 121992 / dam OWNER-DEVELOPER 9 BAER PEC .' I tNF1 ORSG PC B. ANTHONY ALIPERTI 296 24 se H.ROSE BOk /49 40''W' ' 1F P 0 BOX i0� NI SHIRLEY, N.Y. 11967 f " P READ CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO MEAN SEA LEVEL o cz SOU NOW, NY. W71 - a / 85-185 o : 5 Y - N I III 1 : m I r " n yu 1379 45' r !, N KEY �MAP' ' , RFS, AC Ir / 444 � , r , .: 1�, meq• io//' 07 $OUN�'vlFW / s. 1471,00, lF N;.3?'f77p • N10 d�,:. ppo, s9 "i�rl, � ' .�fr. „w•:. ' - �, , SETOFF . 0 I 'Q '� 1795 � i4' 90'� E: k�' . �. •rJ ,� � � ',z - - �'. b /�� 3 � ' 11 vA 289 , W.42z , 10 t 5 s ' :- • „i ,. ' -� '.;,� , mss , '"� Q / If f 7 74 B' :: -„ r: ;: . , - .a, � : - .,. � .:. :,., �. ::. \' :,, r ., '�•:.. '. : 'e' f, «� r.- rx ii •f'r S r ' � 7 , . , .. .: , 9 ` . r • ' I• r e ,off, >'. � 9' � - 4y' • I � ! i 7 s r 7. D d M / , e , nL. . . ' •x -i ., + A , }�', - .: Xi, . :� \ , i. �. i r _,9i. , lel � . 1 4r :,•, e f a r l9 , 1 9A t% , r . 1 ., • E r � % I. e 0 I: N^ e 3 4 i"`"' r i r ' s / I 1 b 70' O s r t F • /� _ T 1 olf 39 2 QN $KETCH PLAN 1 ALPER TI ESM „T - ., TMA \ a 44 A r MA rrITUCK a �, TowN of saUrHoc Aw ff iF . LK Co NTX N.:,Y,. ` cn , .epi ° EN ' b o EW. _ B!Jl 'DING' p/E 80 8 A-C \ " o rD AREA - X5.2155 acres 10005 ,,r01 µ 03 z4 _ 34 r✓ - „ I �\ a.4 . p�y M FIRE Dl _ \ ,ti lne 5�ALE 10 srR�cr curcHocuE `1 ' •� ^+• y✓F •�: ': '" �: " , � �', , f,: r � ` . . - � 'V` -'ll '�1'' �Ul` A. ',py , I � , \\' , � \ \ � 7"9� � \� � .,� a I MAR. . 1992 R , ' 111 oW'NER otvscoaER t� I 4 H. ATL EJ 11✓G>C: P3, r9,92 ` pEC .2' 2s®? I ., - B. ANTHDNY - v : I' Hr, .: R?Q /ea I a ao 4p p 4' Q 1 � 3 / " � LEY{ M'xJ: P,186T, : . ' , f; .. ' ; - . . suuTtdn o . , , , � N �� „ N . : „ " •, . CO, TOtIR 'Cl S , .EF'EREhICED TO MEA'N.SEA LEVEL u" , k: B5 ' 195' e/ N 1 N �t4 a� NS m u 3.05. Z KEY MAP � � = =. 30 SCALE.- Y'= 600' Z 3 f 337' SOLNOVIEW s. l 1/2" osphall wearing course / -- - — ,„, 1 2 112' asphalt binder course 471,00 ' g4459 ,µ- :', \ ,, ,r, W. ¢+�>'/, 4' compacted thickness stone blend of crushed N/0(F „,. •,,,,w"M^"' J S R M."32' n`hsr "� N concrete base Doc, ♦• m *��_ .m m rop ' fra• :'vi.',+' N / 85, v .A B9V �Jl �7- ' �' °�' Rl9 ao ,S . -- Q CMT SETOFF TYPICAL CROSS SECTION ROADWAY s /92, a- - " - z sa LOT 1 A -��� / I � ° �• 9 D \\ 2 gg' 0" E. t 00 �. \ 82. D. S. 33' j4 \` p`. ` prop di h2, / O 3rb�s, � 3g4 y 422.29'N30. 50' 1 W. 95.60 32' 17' 10" 3 0- 9 t / / �2.ei-_-- `717.46• 2000 �' . — -- a-K -7 --rte N. 32' 09' /72,0e9�esf��"n ' AG RES �- p z' p, W l / 35't 773.9 NOVIEW a e\ c\\ 1264.50' ✓� r�e• r l7,2)4� =9' ��\\ V ap /5 / 101F SOU m / � N I , 5 3"x53 i c 1 ` p" W. �o a —fir ;' ! ! b 0 S9•{ t N. 32 3 ER 192, BA 2 / SE N 8. 10" E. \\ 6"5' 3'14 .82 6/L 1 E z S. 3, j6 5 X 7"� ✓�`�'\ `per — / Fo' 0 / o 831.70' ROSE 1 pre -��' �♦ .^ei., N/DIF- ro ree III iG,� Faao' .� `�\\� \ �1\¢c$�\ i I i W � r Z r9o�t1 � � 00' 31' - `� a SKETCH PLAN OF a � o P• ALPER TI ES TA TES, AT MATTITUCK v \ \ }' � o ,�' _ i ems., r•i°i, � P e � D' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1 �-- yZ7 Laos \ % Re er yhW°y' t 9 J F „r - � �� ta° v veyad,,G �a�i/ �EOF New U d 4-0 UFFOLK COUNTY N. Y. ww qCq - a d 1000 - 95 - 01 - 03 BUILDING ZONE= R 80 B A-C AI AREA .= 45.2155 acres ��� to tie line DEC - 41992 '�I SCALE' 1"= 100, SCHOOL DISTRICT, '#r'9 Z I � `I \ ` \ �' FIRE DISTRICT CUTCHOGUE MAR. 30 1992 2' Q1pC��l I — 1 a .y r PLANNING BOA ER - VE OPER ' BA o B NANTHONY ALIPERTI ZjF�' .3 199 2- '24 ROSE H PEC PC BOX 14$ i 1 , \ N. 31' 4d NIDIF (8118), - �!I $ SHIRLEY, N.Y. 11967 I 40' P 0...BO PA40/ ROAD CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO MEAN SEA LEVEL I m" SOUTHOLD, NY. M71 85-185 zlxu �Y � i 0 SV Y,4Yi / sle KEY MAP '� m SCALE.- 1"= 600' ACRES SO NpVIEw 8 33 07 50 E , _ U Q: 1 1/2' asphalt wearing course / _ - -- _ ----- '344.59' 2 I/2' asphalt binder course 1471.00 �' W. \ 4' compacted thickness Slone blend of crushed to/F Jew _ �� / �. ` N„32'1710, concrete bore N m �!�” Oo /6 lym ° { N /tiy� ❑rq;,nya wet � m •� TYPICAL CROSS SECTION -- - S. Lor ) ACM7, sEroFF ROADWAY h ,- - N a •�„ 50, 282 g9,' I�`� &. 33. 14 , � p ' / .. - - 422 z6 � lO�W' - ' , Y ` 139.40' - N30' 50 \ a , I 1 . j W. r 'g5 60 10' ° 117.46• 1 v i I 00" W' 32' 09' RES , 6 R\ 1 V ' 773.92' W as 1264:50' r?;� OUNpVI o o N/plF i 595.4 . r ! ' � 3CI 2' 30 / . I1 a j0•�E �� 6oe� r;82 25 ?� i' 1 1 _ "� 83).70' ROSE I 3 0 ., Ai r„ W Q _ N 31' 321 p0 Z^^ SKETCH PLAN OF AL PER TI ESTATES. ATTITUCK v ` 1, 5"- ATM D° TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --` '�, /•' r ^, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. oF NEW I, AREA .= 45.2155 acres 1000 - 95 - 0'1 - 03 BUILDING ZONE+ R 80 8 A-C OC A� So tooln, �- ' ,>5. � )347.85' to tie line �� / SCHOOL DISTRICT, #9 � �\ �� T �` y� a� r �� SCALE: 1 = 100 FIRE DISTRICT CUTCHOGUE Z I N\1 '^ d y e4 * ;u ;I� MAR. 30 1992 ZA BAER U l ,o ,} r ¢ B.NER-DEVYAPIPERTI I 24' I I ,SO 9E H. MAY' Z19x1 ar DEC .. 03 , Ig92 ( revised) sY P.C. BOX 149 FEB . 19 , 1993 (revised ) N. 31' 40' ao'IW NlolF ROSE (515) SJ SHIRLEY, N.Y. 11967 - 1, - P. O. MAV Ob, 1983 Yevised 1 sour I ruROARD I ( ) - '" PIANNI G BDPRD $OUTIIOLD, KY. 11571 CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENQFD TO MEAN SEAT LEVEL I 85-185. kr n F nR. k, Zl r 1 .IIn"' `:+t+ z< r,0 F, ' I. art °I ld?pt \yyP\a/ �r'; �.: , I -+ atm ' t M1a: Y v V fl -� i rr )� h R, 0�(:, / - .I - - ./' - _ - f.' ,U", .,'4 I m/ /r. III5j - _ a. ,u'; ;1 /, q I -_ - I 1i - ,�4 4 ' I �, 1 ..r - r _ I HI 1. - ,r. a .,. a Tr 11 4r. 0 i, "v,t .,� - J Y.II. . ' r 'v ,. '`, - - - 373:05' tri I. / Vr1 , - ��, I. / : / r h r _ -mr'. KEY MAPr, I /�� �- _ i SCALE; 1" 60b' „ . a - _ f r : �,M� . P , , „ ,', • / r ,. 4 }. r , -R _ _ l ' ' r 1 ., E C R1 . / - / ' : ;� r ., , _ T rk r, - - 0 3 ;, 1 NpV.IEW s. ^r 6U c . __� �" I � d"l/$ 'dSCA`9/f We0/lh¢' Cd#IPSB 1 n f r.. - "' ., r - // _ __ f ., 1.I2 1/9, paphoi b/o irvc9piaep I "` 1 „ - - � � � � � - 871.00' � � j� T I'`59 + •I., 1 �P _ // , t'�tR w ; .. SDS I �j` r r _ . - , - ,! •1710" W. ., E ''+�Y f! ."1,1, �„ do I ' 4' " m ckd ihlclfha+ ck �' A� 1r. d 'iSC / / - Ni.32 � , , °op P1lJ f !{Rr,.41s1M 4, a u he O/F - �� Y - 1 , 'i r :Q 'rnrL „ror , ;1L, {.. f_t;L .CDr(9�e1s:d'tiriW., ' ''+ ,ry ''f�'/ _- , is . <'� - - _ m .! . ,- .r'i� ` , n i a / a 11 /' - I O f i �. ealA .. 1 i,. y , E. �” : -# D � TYPICAL' CJ�OSS' CTI N ' II Ir /^' r . , -- -7 T SF,TOFF 0 {� SR .Lv _ - 'D /' r' i" < ' l 4. i _ y' 1 / 9. , , ,, ,. : d '1, Ir 82CB I, Ill I- I - 4 i . `i'S ` ' 4' ,ti 3 I . � I +'Y 't III21 'I•. MR' h .. a W V' y 4• 4�4 ; I I o, , n , v 1 i"- r A I v Y F x JI , tz . , ,r r4'_ r. , „ , •. 1 a ,': _ / : ems. ° 13 ;..' a .Ir r . •m,h - /' o „ Ar s," --r .. -d . �. , •au.. .r to- . , .. ... .. . ._ � I. ,'. � '. .,,� � ,:,. �'- .:. .,�� � � "' „ ,,, i. q 1. rLIT, yy j„ w�j �_ J. 1,' 5. ry a _, r r � , r, , . I - - , �' ., , � . �.., , „ ., r r :r a 1, I:..r,.. .rx / I (, -,:, 'I. r v � � ... . ..:, ,, . ... .. . , � .:-.x rl... , ,,,, ;'. � ', , .��' .�., 1. ..: - '. ., , _ ,{� 4 / - ..`,GC L +M1 1, IN 'Y ( _ I: i `N9 ' LI r .P \ „_ .,., .� ..::-+.^, v ., I; , ': a - , ,, ,. .':: : J r `w' I '/ fi n: n. N,. Lam' ..- Ti- r I ' n r 's`' 'F. vM1 r. ,,i ,-, 11 r .: 4 / . a,. P v: �` r 11.1 t11 al I ,,, +8 r pn«. x. I \ - ,f.r. t I "x, m R a "J h X + ),, .,. *yl �. ,a,J . A �,. 1� X746 r . b.; ,,.'.k, F1 r , N• an,: i_ x'.4 , a % .. , n ..L 1 ., n 4.., a,. r. �- '1 Y , , I. µ .r,,,, r.,.,r 1 •r y, . .. / C�R Ykl4 -rv4 C T 11 u / '� `,:.i' «y.r „ly, . r' I , : ,, . , , D. :� " r , a ylr. ' 41 1 ,< " 1 III _;,y� ?.,e1 d '•1� I,,, ,. , ,,. .ii:+t ' sw r,+.#b. ' r t ,, '1:;' 'r+\ sIr :+?'b" : / h p0• W. I, .+ ti .I� . 4 n,., 5,�'I ,. Y Y I _ \ ' _ - 09' I J'. n He 4rr� LS!. riT ^ h A '�i r y„ $D'' f I' JL . I' ' , -.�! ^ 1 9 R i Ib �F: L Is ra" h,. ' I r f y,„u 2` I ..rv, ry - .a�' � / ., 73.9 it-, `'� \. �`�� iJ,;C) l , ' ,+ -.I � I ^''S'. Iq -. .r 2 4�/� 11V x .rY .. ,.. r f ' f- . . _ / , ,t.. „ r ., I r _ . ...,. r: r Y, l _ !\ - '.! 1, r,l ilk 4., r _ u,. 4yf, µ• rtt ,\.0 � _ I . * �-C � . �, fi r,.k, '. 'L u, �- - c- :?k :L_: z a ' rF' s° ..,,, `/,. .: e^' r' ._:_„ . 4, ,•,i 1. �.' ,". " . ��� : .. , �,' - 'rt , f 7 y , r' .1.. r, , ,\- t...K ,.. l. . I:,� , , . . rs' y1,� '. '1' „'Wt a .S -. ., . . .,.,,r 'fn :,.. yr . , _ , ' , '. :, r 'L -I r. _._,, : I v,`t I; y r a a :. r, r . . r i I ., L� Ila..,' ��,,CC 1J�,.. 1. .. ..:, v.. , ,y. +„S,. ,.: ,._ a . \ .,. .,., r ... , , §. 1i C fi IT of �{ �F r ( r . II n ." , ) 'S'mG. ,E✓ .,r .., , ... ,r I. „ , ,. Iv v, e . :.f �•I• „ly: •lY,,. �F, _ .M1_ _ ¢, t'' .z , r .r, ' . N } r .. ., q . , a r ' r , ..r :?'„I c� y'IN < Y'r '� � , ., . ,. .J: ,E... r _ a „ (a° 2... .,, a _ i s 1 en r Y:: '_11 I 3'' `I,a., "< . .. r , -•,..,, I ... IF'!Y .. .Fc. � .,�, -,r , .-_ ., ..' . ., n ' :}- . .._ v , • : n � Y, v .. .”' q 1. '.j � iAt., +P , I* m It .L' .1 , 32' i . 'fic '�!, .�.' 1 '�� . I� } 1 :1. :I-. .y mar', III, n, lIr q N• R N, : . .. L, x , ,,n �fI( p L#, 'tl ., ._ > _ , ', _ 1 ' r r. . ,. r - l .;,Y_ , r -,, .' J :,, ., ._, 1" ��yo- � TG: V : Y d 1'a ' „ . . , .',1 t,r e e �,,.. ., ., \ ..�, V .. $ n . . u • S ,. „r 1 r `,. 4.4 ,,, 1ry-'1 %''I , rI I „ .. , 8 „ ., h. r I. ,: .., r :�I'�I, lS `t),,, T«,tri < ,{. ','rIII 't ,+ . �+ r, r. ,{ "-0. "> f . s rr . .m. r -✓. :: ,. }. ' r i _, .,x,. :. ._r, : J. :,.. QJ /ii. . ,�1goo�o 4t" h� i +• 4 `y: �_r w. . :.# I .:, r _ , ,J. e II, ,.� . . i„ .YA . :IL r ' .I. , '"1. ;,' ..P. - �Le 1, r . : xSr7 (I'," L.. r,."„ ...4 , ,. --' '._ I: '' ,,:'�. O - \ fpm - .}, - hP r l ' „ . E5. "`'�' t x < ,, 4 6, 3' 4 / / a :' ; lil _ r . Rr -. .,.1, [. L .r.. .. a . , n 1. e „ V v^' 'r.., .: .� 1'. � " - I I\ f ..X /F n \ N ,.,I, , 2:1- Fon L q'' - ¢ \ , ,, , ° � , ,R .. ,: a. 1 .• �.r_' ,” ':. . �Q „r , „ '' . . . ' .`: n 'J SII r� r. �.. i 1 r `� ii 11 I,�., .'� , �I. J,llll. - .: '1, r> :I;., :, \9 , ' - , 1 _ y, , �"'- , Z / 'v : - 'Ia'\; ,1 nA,'4fM . : I . /, l it',I- 5 _ - : r I: 1, 1 r.' . . . ..«_ , -.I W „ .,n .• , ::,r„ . I .:;,,,, 1 �; , 'I I,1 :; , s ',jr, I' _'4�" �. v „ 1 ., ✓" .'1, 3 \ 9s off „ . � ' Lgf , r . ,'. I;-z-.. f s a ? a. , 11 r, ; - a .,,. .r r; � , .. , ,� „ '.. � I ,i A � 1�'/i'�°'�i1,q;' - Oa I :', 'v. d=- ,'. I :, ..�,; r, , , � ,:�`, I as p �. , J , r 'I l _ ..,., .,p ,1(e:t,i II .. „ ' r' r ,r .rI' - _ . ,.'.. � � � '0 _ 1 F11 - R . ,I , .r ''r.rrr., . _ :., ,t-„ _ �� ,-1 L :• � y,.. . :,Ix, ', i ._ \' /',, ' , V. 1 - � 1Lt' 11 . .E�, . r ,KETCH PLAN , r .y x... . vl•.: �r Q \ !,- �: :!., f ...Dv, t,.,.ul�: , : I ) r , r - .h 'i nD' ` - C. � , n y r .r, I.. P RTl ESTA TES." r { y/y�L/ E ;;,� 1 ;l { I \ �' A�� wr.... 1, 4 u v �' � . � >,.'r - -. ld A, 11 t _ L ,r. a ^ v 7 a T n rrruc 7 . *a �i, "` o-"�' 1. I" - 'i INOF SOUTHOLD , - II', -(:,; A v y si TOWN ' i ', / ,r- 'I 1 �� .'r/ I "I ° .S'UFF. OLK COUNTY, N � th i A 5� � �10 � 6 r � , �� � ', 100 - 95 - 01 - 03' , BUILDING ZONE R 8Q 8 A-4 I — I'''Ir\ rr ��r � ill * 1347.85 SPA . 45.2155 acres 4 .. . r C sa ' �.vr I u11 SCAL"E' 1 - 100 f. LI. [ 6 11 L ,,:I scHr�o� 4I :TR�cT s Z I / I y � I ��� :, vv Zs "L tQ I : line I _. —,,_I FIRE DISTRICT ! CUTCHOGUE �` I, � ; . "�I�1�1�? 1ssL L v .y. 01 I VELOPfRII I - H. BAER I PEcowc suvvEroR� P.C. i ���$ro � d JJ ANTx�Nr LmERn „ I��l.J 3:. /glc <2 z 'I E t (6M) 786- 30?0 If :gs ^'PLaNNIN EAA4p ,_ � . ' I 31. 40'40',Wr % /Q/F R'OS 3� EY;,N„ /ise7 , . MAN ROAD CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED v ��, N "k; N L u „ " SOUTHOLO, K C "071I. (,i ' , . ., :' . . Revrs�,ur : 2y'7�J,�, . . , . r . AN i F .NN,-EV EL 1. / - _ 1- - � r TO ME EL yr 'a I. , "., 85+ 5 0 0=OOJ�o/ 5 i � ' O yv 1373.05, M - / KEY MAP - '�" SCALE.' 1"- 600' �' o ® o r ACRES SOUNpVIEW S. 33. 07 50 E — p l 172' asphalt wearing course �� _ -- --- - / 344,59' 2 l/2' asphalt binder course so 147j'p0' ��' _ 32.1710' W. 4' compacted thickness stone blend of crushed N/o/F _ t4'..32-1710' '•' ,'v concrete base - ` - ' vAs A /G tyro ° N 0^in `�iy 11 3 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION s Lor I AcMr sgroFF ROADWAY R 9 h t N ' ' i s � ., �� - -, - - - // •� c\\\?` ID \ 50E g 77 oW. S, 33• 402,09' 5010: 139.40' 85.60' , 17' I0' W. ' ' 0,L, �k. O,Vj' �' 717.46' 3?Ind ,n5 \ I , 32 ACRES R 1 . 773.92' G ��\ 1264.50' / SO N/O/F }1'l c\ s\ / \� I 5g544 W. 32' 30' 10 BAER Q 01 1V -� µ w6 4 .82 e. _ . 48, 831,70' ROSE I ~ 3 - b/ /ape GD I / N/0/F � '� DoT 3n1 �� A �\ 643 ,n O` 1 n II W. 1 31. 32' 00 Z `° '? _,-- 5*y SKETCH PLAN OFN 1� Lo, ' 30_ eK�/ wn9 0 / ALPER TI ES TA TES. D A T MA TTI TUCK p a' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1 �- 11 1 /1` / 1049.61' SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. cn l/ - �`a , t o AREA = 45.2155 acres 1000 - 95 - 01 - 03 BUILDING ZONE: R 80 8 A-C AI 92 35� /9a,= 13470 D; I U / �PtEOF NE{y�D t0 tie line SCALE 1"= 100/ SCHOOL DISTRICT= #'9FIRE DISTRICT , CUTCHOGUE MAR. 30 1992 BAER ' �[ OWNER-DEVELOPER ALIPERTI Dec.De C. 3,/992 (revision)ODI I I g�'2 40 sg ROSE H JUN 819�i PE S, P.C. Feb. /9,/993 (revision! (51B a Box /49 May 6 1993 (revision W 40 /F -� SHIRLEY, N.Y. 11967 y FGooD A'A2AILD 4Ne -Rom C.ASTA� E2o5t°N 11A zA ep Arlen MAPS , N. 31• s2 N/0 ;�,�,a, SOUTHOLD TOWN P. O. D09a a ��� June 8, 1993 (revision) CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO MEAN SEA LEVEL 1 I, PLANNINGGONRD W MMVA S 71 I 85-185. � I 0 N 1 11T f (,"LLL J ' O O h10 1373.05 m o [n m Z 6 w i O ul CJ KEY MAP SCALE 1"= 600 44?* G ORES 0 rd CJ C _ n r / c 5 Wax's 07 0/ 50" E' m _ ® o/� " Tor/no °o � Pr Pojed' III O PW 07 0 Q 3 h W ., an s 3 E V h r m a` v OUN � m S n t 44.59 � _.�;1 i 2 3 • p . 6 a- ♦O pseoL 5 Sp\ 1471-00' :No- p " - 32'1770" W. 2y,y N/0/F p✓�P N.. O N n 0 T O N b L- '6' R g A , 30 5 A --- o, t l ACMT SETOFF s LO " 1,4 500 E. O I /© ` l •� y �\ 282.89• > S. 33 \ ` , 't?� oo gl'(-ll . �'' C/ - <0' G \ 420-09' .10• W. I � \ A - c m 2 p•e, . , S rC j2 ,v ,/ /�' '�,, 1139.40' " W 11 N,30 85 60. 4 t a v Al O T 0 O as C 2 : - _ ♦ � 2!/ °11 I 1 b%dNl „<' ' :1. .�" i 717.4fi' :p I .r i i - �� 1 N , •, IL° �- _ _� �OT p,l 't 1 % / ' r it p0 Og, 0 0 W. �1 iN. 32" c c , " i• 1! 773.92' Dv�N/ ACRE 6a c\ 264.50' U ��I O a a $ s , 1\•A��`° Qnvelopk \ /�° \ tet...- - p00 '�\ / - , �` IF 5. adesfrmi^ a� e 1 f � r 1 ' 37 r 1 I 1 y D , k / y —� 1 0! L T c .t 0 " rf "-W. s O 9 I / 0 I O o s ti / R I' - - N. A� M ° B , 4R. a 5E H: - 10" E' \ _ - I !A a 32' 49' � I b we!°PE ROSE S. \ Lo ` ' �I/ado i ,II 2c Ba � 1 � �' 3GrA" 2y7.a4�_ 2 6 4 � 09 - 6 dr,0 l >3 0 d 1 N I D• 1 I 2 m i 31 3 Z 9 - a _ _ - f Q G I I I I " A - - W i 'I; I - O O O r F' I I LAND V � 1 tl ALPER TI ES TA TES.' 3 13 S Z a" I AT MATTITUCK i Ll9 0 I� SOUTHOLD nk F O N S � -TOWN o oU s� o , s s _ 6 I' D I 9. ; - 4 _ o ?r i I 0 ., � 5 � Llk LK COUNTY 'N cn _ 1 FFO 1 - .. I `'\ I / 2'po o9 \ ♦_ 1347,85 BUILD -.H 80 & A C AREA 45.2155 acres 1000 - 95 01 = 03 seHooL DIWIC 9 \„ ' SCALE 1"= 100' Z to 'tie line o FIRE DISTRICT CUTCHOGUE !� MAR "31P 1992 BAER ,a - OWNER-DEVELOPER Dec. 3,/992 (revision) July 21,1994 (Land DiylS/op)-, ,. , 1 98.24' 1 •`",re 'H. ' , '' r - P.C. B. ANTHONY ALIPERTI MAR 1 01995 D ,Feb.; 19 /993 (revision) J-<✓ 26, /994 (PtV4yt:M l 1 W. ROSE r '. BOX /49 J-,v gr /Y9w KEY id%c - i 40'40' . I� s : SHIRLEY, N.Y. 11967 _ ,1 ay' 6, 19 3 (revision P�r � ! 6 F V! IoM � /WF NA 2AE0 P2EP MAPS ., N. 31• C2 � N/O/F :�epXoaA PIAN/NlNceoAo June B, 1993"(reulsion) 0, 99 (. + ➢ F v#AIA4' 5+ e�+'C,4as* a` uN' /993 (ra°/s/>^) C00'OUR LIN£$',ARE REFEI EN�W TO MEAN SEA LEVEL ' a 85-185