Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-87.-5-21.3 $ n4ralra 04yvit=w -ow - =o r t IA5 S.i~O'02'40"F, _ - - 593A2 `kD MINOk: SUBDi\'1:~,1G'fJ 11 43.42 C;O.0 11 500 /5U.' _ _ MsL = x: 1 ITT, 47 a ate 11 -,y fJ-~YVIE'N.. - o r 41041 a. T. 41.040 a f I 4/.610 99 Towns of= rwruol_•.;, N'r: 9 0 1~ ~ a Q o i .if! acts.+f !t: y a 8 »'a'o•e o. w ~ ~ y r r o J' Nn Q. ° ~ Ow\ned a Davelo~,cd F,f: p ~ >:M S c~ n?.£7 lZ3 E.J ° - GC - 123.60 - 8 ~ocrNrold. N.Y. g.5 N 60'02 ro'w 543.67 8 LANG CF J4AIGS BITSF."5 wf~"olk Co. Taa Mofa Qe~iq+mfion: y OiSt 1000, Sect 087, eloak ~arh of tkl. 21. i ~l~ k--- ~I ! ~~.Arrtea sa c/ Mar. 13.1979. - T ":y ,i!3 hf 1 I L_ eov .ew ~J~~ 1 91 y C- 1 )o w s ou p Ifa~. V 1 MI., E C St~a E C: Ll --I v\`~ r r•:umE Ma(reJ ?a n. /6.1979 ` w :nsirslrg ~ ' '~w / ro of w vum c r . ` QCOE21GK vgNTU; f_ F?L. -IT I! /f \ r_orei KEY MAf~ \v u 0. * I . V< V C.•er~ 800' M a qM6 Liaeased Lord Swve M rrenforF. Ne k I - '"••nr.v7w. nwW,yYa+53Wq{niW4ilnvp' ~ ` wMx xxuwrn....." Planning Board -7- June 12, 1979 Mr. Coyle: The map of May 14th indicates there will be a fire hydrant. Mr. Lark: It is on the working drawings. The site plan doesn't get filed, just with the Town. That is put on the record at the County Center. That is part of his construction performance that he has to do. Mr. Raynor: Mr. Gordon and Mr. 0rlowski, do you have anything? Mr. Gordon: No. Mr. Orlowski: No. Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone present this evening that has some information regarding this subdivision that they would like to bring before this board at this time. Hearing none, I will declare the hearing closed. A copy of the Suffolk County Planning Department recommendations on the preliminary map is to be sent to Mr. Lark. Country Club Estates fire well. Mr. Lark is the attorney for the Cutchogue Fire Department. As soon as he receives the recording fee for the fire well from Mr. Babcock he will send a letter on behalf of the fire district. O'Conne~and Lizza. Philip Ofrias, Esq., appeared. Mr. Raynor would like something in writing as to what is going to happen to the property north of the railroad tracks. Mr. Ofrias said at the present time there are no plans to do anything north of the railroad. Lot #1 will be purchased by whoever owns Kreiger Well and Pump Corporation and Lot #3 will be purchased by Harvey Bagshaw, Inc. Parcel 3 will be annexed to the diagonal piece. Mr. Raynor suggested it be put in with Bagshaw's property and excluded from the subdivision. There is no zoning designation on the map. The street should be relabelled right-of-way or easement. Mr. Gordon moved for the adoption of the following, Mr. Coyle seconded the motion. Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter ~4 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Planning Board -8- June 12, 1979 DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION The minor subdivision of Catherine Bitses is a four-lot residential subdivision of 3.769 acres at Southold in the Town of Southold, New York. The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned; The NYSDEC indicates that this proOect may lie within State jurisdiction under the Tidal Wetlands Act as it appears to lie within 300 feet of tidal wetlands. Further review will be made upon receipt of application to NYSDEC. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has indicated that the availability of sufficient potable water is questionable and should require a test well prior to approval for home construction; The project will meet all requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land regulati~s. Further information can be obtained by contacting Ms. Muriel Brush, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Town Hall, Southold, New York 11971. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Coyle, Gordon, Orlowski This notice is to be sent to Commissioner Flacke, Supervisor Martocchia, James Bitses, Esq., Roy L. Haje, NYSDEC, Royal R. Reynolds, SCDHS, George Fisher, Sr. Building Inspector, Suffolk County Planning Commission and will be posted on the Town Clerk's Bulletin Board. Mr. Gordon moved for the adoption of the following resolution. Mr. Coyle seconded the motion. WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of a subdivision plat, entitled Minor Subdivision of Catherine Bitses, was submitted to the Planning Board on March 30, 1979, and an application fee of $40 was paid on April 13, 1979, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the said subdivision applicati~and plat at the Town Hall in Southold, New York, on May 8, 1979 at 8:00 p.m., and WHEREAS, the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and application. Planning Board -9- June 12, 1979 Now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the application of Catherine Bitses for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C., and dated March 13, 1979 be approved and that the Chairman of the Planning Board be authorized to endorse approval on said subdivision plat. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Coyle, Gordon, Orlowski Mr. Coyle moved for the adoption of the following. Mr. Orlowski seconded the motion. Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION The minor subdivision of Charles S. Witherspoon is a two-lot residential subdivision on 2.7 acres at Southold, New York.(#160) The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned; The NYSDEC has no objection to the project as it does not appear that the project lies within the jurisdiction of the Tidal Wetlands Act due to distance of tidal water; The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has stated that it is expected that the conditions will be suitable for water supply and sewage disposal; The project will meet all requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land regulations. Further information can be obtained by contacting Ms. Muriel Brush, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Town Hall, Southold, New York, 11971. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Coyle, Gordon, Orlowski This notice is to be sent to Commissioner Flacke, Supervisor Martocchia, Stanley S. Corwin, Esq., Roy L. Haje, NYSDEC, Royal R. Reynolds, SCDHS, George Fisher, Sr. Building Inspector, Suffolk County Planning Commission and will be posted on the Town Clerk's Bulletin Board. THIS LOT LiNE CHANGE BETWEEN AND IS LOCATED ON IN SCTM# 1000- LOT LINE CHANGE - N Complete application received M o~ Application reviewed at work session xro• ? Q r Q-°,° ~m t OK ~ inro. H Applicant advised of necessary revisions ~0L OK Revised submission received ixro. ? `R ixrc.~ OK 19 Lead Agency Coordination o SEQRA determination Sent to County Planning Commission ,ro.` oK ~O ~j ~ ~ ixro. OK Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received ixro` oK Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed ,xro. OK K Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Final Public Hearing Approval of Lot Line -with conditions Endorsement of Lot Line ms 1/1/90 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To fire Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: L The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land tinder application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivisions to be . MTN0R.SUBD1VIS.1,0N.-. KATHERTNE. RITSES........ 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of decd suggested.) 4. The land is field by the applicant under deeds recorded in Soffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber .....112(18 Page .....595............. On .....Ja uarY.?st,.?:991 Libel- 8576....... Page .....442 On F.eb 1*t,..1979..: Liber Page On Liber Page On Liber Page On , as devised under the Last Will and Testament of Pja or as distributee .........n/a 5. The area of the land Is .....15...$........ acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid 7. The land is cuctunbered by .........node mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber Page In original amount of $ unpaid annount $ meld by address (b) Mortgage recorded hr Liber Page in original amount of unpaid amount held by address JAN Z 199/' (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber Page in original amount of unpaid amount held by address 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land i 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts A-C 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise,Vx- none, 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land kftd (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. - trict, if within a District, is C. 13. Water mains will be laid by n/a and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ........11A and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by PA and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "LB" hereto, to show saute. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showinti all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $ r as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE !~4~!?. 190 ~THER,INE, BITSES (Naf o Ap flican A~- By (Signature and Title) KATHERINE BITSES-OWNER LIGHTHOUSE. ROAD. ROUTHA.LD,N.,X..II.9Z1..... (Address) STAT1? OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OoF~........ S.LIFFQLTC................ ss: On the tA clay 9f..... ' t...7.......... 19. %4 before ute personally came -KATHERINE .BITS.ES to ttte known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that , , SHE executed the same. AVIS PITS[-, i ~~n f.H* PUnI IC.<a t~- nr Flew YorF . ?22630 ~rfy No ublic S7'.\TE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss: Ott the day of 19......, before the personally came to file known, who being by file duly sworn did de- Ifnse and say that resides at No ................................that is the of the cot-porntion described iu and which executed the foregoing instrument; that knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. and 06al signed mule thereto by like order. Notary Public Southold Town Planning Board Town Hail Southold# New York 11971 w Re:MTNOR SURDIIISION -KATHERINE BITSES Gentlemen! The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will he made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, KATHERINE BITSES 'A S`i iV t G 11 O-A'IhD •ro~~;vo ~~sow~`u~tu a:%1 SUFFOLIC-COIjI• Ty ` z--t `s Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1933 QUESTI'bNNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer to any of the following, questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence: 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Ho (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there.any other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? #m No 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? l#M No 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department.or agency?(Town.,. State, County, etc.) No 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? ) No 6. Was this property the subject of any prior. application to the Planning Board? Yes XN15 7. Does this property have a valid certificate of occupancy, if yes please submit a copy of same 7g No I certify that the above statements are true and will be relied on by the P nning Board in considering this applicat'on. Si nature'o2 property owner or authorized agent ate KATHERINE BITSES Attachment to questionnaire for:-the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: on the 16pe day of 19,~Vbefore me personally came- KATHERINE BITSES to Mme known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrumc and acknowledtletl that SHE execute ie same. No ar Public n; SCL 30, 14-18-4 (2187)-Text 12 • • PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 SEQR Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT /SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME KATHERINE BITSES MINOR SUBDIVISION-KATHERINE MITSES 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality BAYVIEEW - SOUTHOLD TOWN County SUFFOLK 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road Intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD IN VICINITY Oh VICTORIA DRIVE 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: ? New ? Expansion ? Modification/alteration LOT LINE CHANGE 8. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: FOUR LOT MINOR SUBDIVISION MOVED WESTWARD FIFTY FEET IN UNISON 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially FOUR acres Ultimately 1:'rn acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? UYes ? No If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF F PROJECT? n lesldential ? Industrial ? Commercial ? Agriculture ? Park/Forest/Open space ? Other Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ? Yes 13No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals 11. DOES ANY yASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ? Yes No If yes, list agency name and permitlapproval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ? Yes U NO I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ~e / la Applicant/sponsor name KATHERINE BITSES Date: Signature: X-T° If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSENT (To be completed by Agency) . A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE 1 THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12? If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. Elyse UN. B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW As PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.6? If No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another Involved agency. ?Yes 13 No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, If legible) Cl. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: NO C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: NO C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: NO C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly. NO C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be Induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. NO C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl-C57 Explain briefly. NO C7. Other Impacts (Including changes In use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. NO D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? ? Yes 92No If Yes, explain briefly PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect Identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, Important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed In connection with Its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) Irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. It necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been Identified and adequately addressed. ? Check this box if you have Identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse Impacts which MAY occur- Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ? Check this box If you have determined, based on the Information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result In any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Name of Lea Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Office, in Lea Agency Tit e of Responsible Officer Signature o Responsi le O icer in Lea Agency Signature o Preparer (I i Brent rom responsi e o icer) Date 2 $randarrl N: Y. 9. T. V. Form 8001 i Barlain aerl Sal, berd, wirl, Covmm alain,r CramorY A InAi.idual or Cogro,vien (Sinhe Sh<a) eoNSULt YOUtt LAWYM 6000 I?IONINO tNIS INSTRUMENt-tNIS INSiMUMI OULb !E ULSb SY LAWYEas otrtr. 0 11208PC595 ***DO NOT PUBLISH*** I l THIS INDENTURE, made the FIRST day ofJANUARY , nineteen hundred audNINETY-ONE 1 BETWEEN JAMES BITSES residing at lG J~ N LIGHTHOUSE ROAD - e-x SOUTHOLD, N. Y. party of the first part, and KATHERINE BITSES residing at /wl• LIGHTHOUSE ROAD SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 party of the second part, WITNFAISETN/ that the patty of the first part, In consideration of ten dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the patty of the Second part, does here b~~y grant and release unto the party of the Second part, the heirs (7` of successors and assigns of the party' Hf'the`S4011diphfi forevet, DA L1, that certain plot, piece of of of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, ar ing and being in the Town oI Southold, Suffolk County and State of New York, FE FOrounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument on the Southerly line of Main Bayview Road at a Northeasterly corner of the land of Perry, said point by tie-line being NORTH 75 EGREES, 59 MINUTES, 30 SECONDS WEST, 242. 72 feet from the point of inter- C edtion of the Northerly line of Main Bayview Road with the Westerly line of ^F Victoria Drive: NEW NO UNNING THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTLIERLY LINE OF BAYVIEW ROAD TWO COURSr SOUTH 64 DEGREES, 07 M1'NUTF3 ' 001 SECOIVbS, FAST 9. 67 FEET,- ) SOUTH 60 DEGREES, 02 MINUTES,"40'iSitO605 EAST, 586. 72 FEET TO THE SAND OF JAMES BITSES: .DISTRICI 1000 THENCE ALONG SAID LAND TWO COURSES: 1000 -SOUTH 29 DEGREES, 57 MINUTES, 20 SECONDS WEST, 300 FEET; SECTION SOUTH 48 DEGREES, 00 MINUTES, 00 SECONDS WEST, 870 FEET MORE OR 0.87. 00 LESS TO THE, ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OF COREY CREEK; BLOCK: HENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID HIGH WATER MARK AND AT,ONG'f:i:? 05.00 EASTERLY SHORE OF A CERTAIN BOAT BASIN OF'CANAL, 900 FEET, MORE OR ESS TO LAND OF A. A. FINK, JR.,; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG FINK'S LOTS:, SAND 550 FEET MORE OR LESS, TO-SAID LAND OF PERRY; 021. 00: THENCE ALONG SAID LAND OF PERRY, 10 DEGREES, 00 MINUTES, 00 SECONDS ,AST, 230 FEET TO THE POINT OR PLACE OF BEGINNING. TOGETIER with all right, title and interest, if any, of (he party of the first part in and to any streets and toads abutting the above described premises td the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and tights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD file premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs of successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. 1111,( AND the party of the first part, io compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fumt to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvnneut and will apply the same first to the 14yment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for i (.i(. I, any other purpose. n.f tl The word "party" shall he construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHERPOP, the party of the fit it part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. I';t II ,I (ii,l r IN PRESENCE OF: RECEIVED $ --C,---- - I 1_L = G R E A F S I A T E - - - - - - - - - - - - - JAN 24 1991 JAMES BI'1SES TRANSII:R TAX SUI f OLI; COIJ f ! I Y .r-_ i STATE 03 NEW YORK, COUNTY o SUFFOLK ire STATE OF NEWRK, COUNTY Of On the 1'/" day of 19 C), before me oil the y of 19 before tile personally came personally cattle to me tknown to be file individual described in and Who to me known to be the individual described in and who C) executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. ~ executed the same. - - - - - - - HELENE D. HORNE Notary Public, State of Newyork No. 495131;4 Qualified in Suffolk Court Commission E>rpires May22%,11191 STATE OR NEW YORK, COUNTY Or isi STATE OR NEW YORK, COUNTY or On the day of 'le Y 19 before uie On the (la of personally came y 19 before n to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and personally came say that fie resides at No, the subscribing witness the foregoing (ng btetil with wfiohi I am personally acquainted, who, being by me (Ink that he is the sworn, did depose and say that fie resides at No. of that he knows the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing histrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed described in and u'ho exettited the 'foregoing titstrintent; to said instrimient is such corporate seal; that it was so that fie, said subscribing witness, was present and saw affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- execute the same; and that he, said witness, (ion, and that he signed It name tbereto by like order. at like same time subscribed It name as witness thereto. r'1 11ttryattt and #Itlr llrrb SECTION 087. 00 R'1111 COl't;NAN'1' ACAINSI' (3IIAN'1011'S ACTS BLOCK 05.00 111 LE No. - Lot 021. 001 &-021. 002 COUNTY Ott TOWN OF SOUT11OLb, SUFFOLK COUNTY TO RETURN AY MAM TO: 7 _ STANDARD FORM Or NEW YORK SOARD Or nTli UNDERWIIItERS JAMES BITSES, ESQ. [Thiributed by BOX # 1407 SECURITY TITLE AND GUARANTY COMPANY SOUT11OLb, N. Y. 11971 CHARTIR!b tDiA OTm N!W YORK (516) 765-4321 Zip No. w V W a O O 2 O K O °o ~1Nn0.i t' lr N aN/tr/;' ' ~ 'Q l6, h~d zh ~ ~ hZ Nei cif! > a Standard N. Y. B.7. U. Form 8002-8-63- v, and Sale Decd with Covenant against Grantor's -Individual or Corporation (single sheet) V` t:ONSULT YOUR LAWYEIF 13EFORE SING THIS INSTRUMENT--HIS VISTRUME H MOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY. ti9Fs8576 encc~~~~G .tu;<~a THIS iNDENTUItE, made the / day of nineteen hundred and Je_. _11y BETWEEN JAMES BITSES, of Main Road, Southold, New York 1.1971 party of the first part, and KATHERINE BITSES, of Lighthouse Road, \ Southold, New York 11971 • party of the second part, valuable consideration paid WUNthe party ESSETH, H, that f he the second of the first hereby grant consideration and release unto the party of theme second part, the heirs or suc essorS and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the Southerly line of Main Bayview Road about 1,000 feet westerly along said line from Jacob's Lane, being the northwesterly corner of land conveyed by Howard A. Toedter Inc. to Lefferts Edson, and I~ running thence more or less perpendicular to the Southerly line of Main Bayview Road as follows: South 29057'2011 West a distance of 300 feet, thence parallel to the Southerly side of Main Bayview Road North 60 0214011 West a distance of 543.67 feet, thence North 49000' East a distance of 88.36 feet, thence North 100 00' East a distance of 230.29 feet to the Southerly side of Main Bayview Road, thence South 600021Li.0" East a distance of 593.112 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. kn O O h O q TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part of, in and to any streets and roads abutting the above-described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HA AND TO ° HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of kl the party of the second part forever. O AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as O AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- Q eration as a trust fund to. be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply 9 the same first to the payent of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for n any other purpose. 'w„ The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WrMESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. ) a ~J O IN PRESENCE OF: Fi1(7f+N R EA r' 2lC~r% ~ Q ~ o RE~/-AL ES I , AM : BITSES \ FEB 11979 ~j aati.,y RA 5M T C UN9 Y LIBiR U~~U Pn U STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ass STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF aS: On the / Ca day of (~P~u crap 197 before me On the Personally came 1 y ~ personally came day of 19 before me JAMES BITSES to me known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the Mine. executed the same. !AWARD C HINea ROTARY PUBLIC, %ft of Ne+ "se: No. 82.4601079 tw&W In Suffolk Counly Isom Tatpwa March 30. 118'o STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SIB, STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: On came day of 19 before me On the day of 19 before me personally came to me known, who, being b me duly sworn, did depose and the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with say that he resides at No. whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly that he is the sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. of that he knows the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation: that the seal affixed described in and who executed the foreto he going instrument; to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- execute the same; and that he, said witness, tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. ~RrgRin RHi1 f'iR1P ~aPd SECTION WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS - BLOCK Tn LE No. 1 oT COUNTY OR TOWN JAMES BITSES TO KATHERINE BITSES Recorded At Request of American Title Insurance Company RETURN BY MAIL TO: STANDARD FORM OF NEW YORK BOARD OF TITLE UNDERWRITERS ~ / O ~l~aS c Distributed by /-~PJ~ 6 L aJ tw T/TLL° ~Tauvz~ra 4,' /~7 . INSURANCE COMPANY 1 Zip Nn. A Afember of The Continental insurance Companies W V LL 0 19 u y RECORDED. W N FEB 1 '919 & ARTHUR 1. FEUCE peck 91 Suffolk county, W W a _ (2187) '7c 0 017.21 SFC~R Appbndlx ADEC 61993 Slate EnvironMrnlal,(]lfalily flevlew ! FULL ~NV1nUNM~Nt' L 1SSSSSMENT ron~l butposh: the full W Is designed to help 1001icants and agendes deierminr, in in otcledy manner, whether a proirct of ltdon tniy be 3ignifirant. the gliestich of tvf,otlitr an action t ldy be significant b hot always easy to answer. t'reriurnt ly, (Pete Alp iMprcts of i project 0111 :Ile 5111jective. of Unmeatuteihir. It Is also onderslond that those who drlerminr slgudlicauce lusty have little or nn lotmil knowledge of the envirorvmenl or rmay be techmlcaliy expetf in rrrviroornrnlal *,nilysis. Ili iddltiof, Many who have Ikhowledge hi one paluculat area may nol be aware of the broader concerns affecting Ihp questfoti of 0gfllicAItce. the full tAt It Ititpit(W to i-okil,ide-A Ined,•:, [Mirlfilly atipliCaiils 1V14 igp cfes far W ascurrd that fdlr delrrminatinn Ptoctt§ IlAs beep ofdetly, couipteliro0ve If salute, yet flexible to allow Inttoductioo of htfotmalloti to fit A project or action hull t.Ah tuttlpatft!uh! the full tAl: Is comptlsedrof ihtre pnils Miff isSI'rovldds <,hl,~cllve ditA ild inlotmauoti about a riven project dud ll'S site fry Iderulf0tin basic project 61A. It issisl5 A tevlewet lot the Anliysis flat fakes place In Parts 2 and 1. PAO It tochses oft idenlifying the taupe of possible impacts Ihit may occur from A ptoierf or action it ptnvidp5 fl' L ollditice Asst to whether Af Impact Is likely inrrln •ir,idr-ted small to umf1vtale,or gllirther it 15 a potentialltr- iargc impact. file Will Also Idenli(les whel(irr all fmpnct`c7n be iiiitigated or reduced. Pitt 1: If ally hnpict In Part 2 is Identified is polt,ntially larpv, Yuen Vast 3 is used to evaluate whether or lint flip Impict 15 actually IMpottant bt7khMINMIt7N Ut 51(;NltlcANCt-type t and Unlisled Actions Identify the Foftlous of W tonipleled flit Ihfs pfolecl: U Part I U Parl 2 UPatt 3 Upon review of life, Informallon tecotded on this W (fails I and }'and t if ipptopriale), and any other supporfinn infofmatlort, A1td con51detilp 6111 flue mallitude, and Ilnporlancr of earl impact, It Is reasonahly deleunined by fire leAd agency dial: M A. tine proirct will not result Ili arty large, and ihgiotlifl Impart(s) slid, thrr•fole, is osir which will ern( leave it slg_nificatit irupict on Il,e envilonntrut, therefore a Iterative declarAldof will be ptepited. tI fi. Alfhougli (Ire project could leave a opulflcilf tdfect off the. euvitolmenf, there will not be A sipntficam eflprf lot (lids Unilsted Actloti betAttse the uilligatimi measures cdesctibed In PART 3 have been required, therefore i t01,IbItI014b tievIlve declatallou will be prepared.` rj C. the proirct rainy result In one or most, Intge antd ingifitlm11( r•: that may have A significant tmpacl of fife environnienL Ihetefote A Positive des-Intslinu will be pfepated. A Coudllloned Negative Declaration Is only valid for Utilktild Actions MINOR SUBDIVISION - KATHERINE BITSES: LOT LINE CHANGE Natnr of Aclinn-- - - - - - Nanie of Lead Agency u Print of type Nitur of Responsible Officer in Lead Apt,ncy I tlln of Respoll0ble officer Slgttalure of flesponsible officer in Lead Arrtrry Signalureof 1'repatt!t(if differeutIsom te.5ponstbleofficer) bale - - JAN 1 T ART 1-PROJECT INFORM* A ' Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in detetmining whether the action proposed may have 0 5lgftltlfiflt effeft oh the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through F. Answers to these questions will he comidered> St part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additionalt information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAE will be dependent on Information currently available and will not involve held studies, tesearch or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each Instance. NAME OF ACTION MINOR SUBDIVISION - KATHERINE BITSES: LOT LINE CHANGE LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Slreel Addre99, Munlclpallly and County) MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD, SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK CO., NEW YORK - - - ME OF APPUCANTISPONSOR ? nUSINESS TELEPHONE KATHERINE BITSES (516 ) 765-5700 ACDRESS - - c/o JAMES BITSES ESQ. CITVIPO STATE ZIP CODE BOX # 1407 SOUTHOLD. N. Y, U971 N. Y. 11971 NAME OF OWNER (If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ) ADDRESS - CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION LOT LINE CHANGE Please ComplelA~a~~1 rZUcsijo~V'-I Ir~dlcldjr ty!a: il'jtiiC S~(j~iclalile .~I' I' I, t )I I, ! t) `.I : N f II; F; A. SOL% Veserlpt'.gp. f Physical sett(hg Ol overall project, botk developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land U54: ElUtban' ''4' UlntluttriO []Commercial ?Residential (suburban) 1211ural (non-faun) UForest UAgriculture UOther _ I ~ :r 2. Total acreageci Orro)ect area: 15.8 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRFSENTI-Y AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or 13rushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres korested XX 15_St__- acres acres Agricultural (Includes Orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of [CI-) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surf Cs II I acres _ acres other (Indicate t I II Yne) acres acres 3. What Is predoininfint soil typi,(s) on project ON a. Soil drainage: BWell ylralhec~,_,~42°In a/n of site UMndcrately well drained ;.~Ll a,6 of site - UPoody drained % of site b. If any agricultural I,pd is invoived,,how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 thiough •1 bf the NYS~ Land Classification System? none acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4: Are there bedrock outuo0pings on project site? UYes ONO a. What is deptiT to bedrock? - - - (in feet) 2 5. AtpiSrgxi.nate percentage of propos v ct site with slopes: No-10°~ • % LI Io-15% 0715% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ?Yes Mo 7. IS project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ?Yes XN0 8. What is the depth of the water table? 501 (in feet) 0. Is site located over a primaty, principal, or sole source aquifer? ?Yes Ito 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ?Yes XNO i1. boes project site contain any species of ~ Iant or animal life that is Identified as threatened or endangered? ?Yes XINNo According to identify each species 12. Are there any unique or Unusual land forms on the project site? (I e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) dyes VINO Describe - - 13. Is the project site presently Used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ?Yes Flo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to ~e ~ nportant to the community? Dyes )Me 15. Stream's Within or contiguous td project area: none a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within.br contiguous to project area: a. Name none b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? XXIYes LINO A) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? XEIYes LINO b) If Yes, Will Improvements be necessary to allow connection? Oyes X2Jo 18. Is the site located In ah agricultural district cettified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? UYes MNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical tnviromnental Area designated pursuant to Article 6 M the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6171 ?Yes X1.XN0 20. l-Ias the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ?Yesio It. Project beterlption 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total tonfigUoUS acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor _ 15.8 - acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: d nnn acres initially; 4.0 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain Undeveloped non acres. d. Length of project, in miles: n /a (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n1a f. Number 6f off-street parking spaces existing n/a ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated pet hour none (upon completion of project)? h. It residential: Number and type of housing units: hone One tarnily ^fiwo ramily Multiple ramify Condominium Initially n/a Ultimately n/a i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure n/a height; width; length. i. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? n(a ft. 3 2. Now much hAtural materia~ ck, earth, etc.) will be removed fr01 ite? -tone tons/cubic Yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclairnell []Yes EJNo XINN/A A. If yes, for what intehd.,: purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ?Yes ONo t. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ?Yes ONo i 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) Will be removed from site? none acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-Important vegetation be removed by this project? ?Yes IMO 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction n/a months, (including demolition). 7. if multi-phased: A. Total number of phases anticipated n/a (number). ti. Anticipated date of commencementRhase 1 - e month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase - - month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Oyes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? []Yes XNO 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction MI6 after project is complete io. Number of jobs eliminated by this project n /a 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Oyes XINNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Oyes )PN0 a. It yes, indicate type of wasteAsewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into Which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Oyes • %No Type / 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase of decrease by proposal? ?Yes ONo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ?Yes XNNo 16. Will the project generate solid Waste? OYes XMNo A. It yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ONo t. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Oyes ?No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid Waste? UYes MUNo J. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site fife? ye'ati. ' 18. Will project use herbicides of pesticides? ' byes M000 1). Will project routinely proditlce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes XXNo 20. Will ptoject produce operating noise exceeding the I6c41 ambient noise levels? []Yes X ' c, 21. Will project result In An Increase in enetgy Use? Dyes X1XNo If yes , indicate type(s) - 22. It water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity n/a gallons/minute.. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day n/a gallons/day. 24. hoes project Involve Local, State or federal fundl4i OYes XX]No If Yes, explain M\ - 4 2~. Approvals Requited: 4 • • Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ?Yes "o _ "WTown, XiP17gx Planning Board Mes ?No lot line change NY, Town Zoning Board Dyes XXNo City, County Health Department ?Yes NX40 Othet Local Agencies Oyes Xwo Other Regional Agencies ?Yes XMNo State Agencies ?Yes XEKNc, I"ederal Agencies ?Yes XXNo C. Zoning and planning Information 11. Does proposed action involve A planning or zoning decision? ?Yes XNNo If Yes, Indicate decision required: ?zoning amehdment ?zoning variance ?special use permit ?subdivision ?site plan ?new?revision of master p1s" ?resource management plan ?other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the Site? ae J. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? -n/ a 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ac nn rhnngP 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed As permitted by the proposed zoning? n1a C 6. IS the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ?Yes XXJNo 7. What ate the predominant land Use(s) and zoning classifications within a mile radius of proposed action? Eke 8. Is the proposed action compatible with ad)oihinglsurrounding land uses within a 1/ mile? )Mes ?No 9. It the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? n/& A. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action tequire any authotizatioh(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ?Yes X1K)No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided Services (recreation, education, police, fire ptotection)? ?Yes Flo A. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ?Yes ?No 11. Will the proposed action result In the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ?Yes XNNo it. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Oyes ?No ti. Informatlonal Details Attach any additional Information as may be heeded to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid theht. t. Verification 1 certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Spon.or Nam B E Date Oct 24th 1993 -KATHERINE Signature ! 6a waQ ~2j Title -0&t"r/ It the AcHOn (s in file Coastal Atea, and you ate A stale agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with Ibis Assessment. 5 part ~PI10JECT IMPACTS AND THEI MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General InlotmAlion (Read Carefully) A Ih completing the form the teviewet should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been tMohablef The reviewer is hot expected W 1}e ph expert environmental analyst. 6 Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessafity significant. Any latge impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. A the Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger A response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and (of most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate lot A Potential Large Impact response, thus tequiring evaluation in hart 3. 6 The Impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. + the number of examples per question does•not indicate the Importance of each question. 6 In Identifying Impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Ihstruttioht (Read carefully) a. Antwet each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. MAybe answers should be considered As Yes answers. t. If Answering Yes to a question then check the appropriaft box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the Impact. If Impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If Impact will occur but threshold it lower than example, check column 1. d. It teviewet has doubt about size of the Impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If A potentially large impact checked in column f tan be Ot gated by change(s) In the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Vet box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This Must be explained In Part A. s V, 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be L IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large , Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change i Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Examples that woUm apply to column 2 JO DYES n/a n/a n/a + Any Construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ? ? ?Yes ?No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. A Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ? ? ?Yes ?No 3 feet. 6 Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ? 0 ?Yes ?No + Conttructloh on land where bedrock is exposed of generally within ? u ?Yes ?No 3 feet of existing ground surface. 6 Conttruction that will continue for More than i year or involve more ? ? ?Yes ?No than one phase or stage. 11 Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ? ? ?Yes ?No long bl hatutal material (i.@., rock of soil) per year. A Constructioh or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ? ? ?Yes ?No 4 Construction In a designated floodway. ? ? ?Yes ?No Other Impacts hone ? ? ?Yes ?No 2; Will thereattt an effect (,....ry unique or unusual land forms Intuit! bn the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc0 DYES & Specific land forms! ? ? ?Yes ?No 6 3' 2 3 IMpAr;f oN WATpfa Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the bhvirohmental Conservation Law, ECL) 40 DYES n/a n/a n/a tkAiriplo§ that would apply to column 2 I bevelopable area of site contains a protected water body. ? ? ?Yes ?No a btedging Mote than too cubic yards of material from channel of a ? ? ?Yes ?No protected stream. • t0enslod of utility distribution facilities through a 'protected water body. ? ? ?Yes ?No 6 Construction In a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ? ? ?Yes ?No I Other Impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of waterf NO DYES h/a n/a n/a • txAMples that would apply to column 2 + A 10% Increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ? ? ?Yes ?No or more than a 10 acre increase of decrease. + Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ? ? ?Yes ?No + Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality of quantity? XCANO DYES n/a n/a n/a Pxamplet that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ? ? ?Yes ?No 4 Ptoposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ? ? ?Yes ?No C have approval to serve proposed (project) action. s Proposed Action tequires water supply ftom wells with greater than 45 ? ? ?Yes ?No gallons per minute pumping capacity. & Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ? ? ?Yes ?No Supply system. 1 Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ? ? ?Yes ?No A Liquid effluent will be conveye.) off the site to facilities which presently ? ? ?Yes ?No do hot exist of have inadequate capacity. A Proposed Action would use water th excess of 20,000 gallons per ? ? ?Yes ?No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ? ? ?Yes ?No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. a Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ? ? ?Yes ?No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses iri areas without water ? ? ?Yes ?No andlot Sewer services. 4 Proposed Action locales commercial and/or industrial uses which may ? ? ?Yes ?No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. s Other impacts: nonev ? ? ?Yes ?No 6. Will ptopoSed action alter dtairiage flow or patterns, or surface wales runoff! XQMNO DYES Lxatnples that would apply to Column 2 6 Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ? ? ?Yes ?No 7 • 2 3 to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change + Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ? ? ?Yes ?No 6 Proposed Action k incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ? ? ?Yes ?No A Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ? ? ?Yes ?No a Other iinpack3: .,otyp ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON AIn 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? XXINO [DYES n/a n/a n/a Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more *hicie trips in any given ? ? ?Yes ?No hoot. S Proposed Action vKill,result in the incineration of mote (ham 1 ton of ? ? ?Yes ?No tefiise per bout. + Emission take of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ? ? ?Yes ?No heat source producing more than 10 million 13TU's per hour. I Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ? ? ?Yes ?No to industrial use. Proposed action will allow an Increase in the density of industrial ? ? ?Yes ?No development within existing Industrial areas. a Oth~f Impacts none ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 9. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endan ered species? MNO ?YES n/a n/a n/a ttatmples that would apply to column 2 4 Reduction of one or mote species listed on the New York or rederal ? ? ?Yes ?No list, Using the site, over or heat site of found on the site. S (removal of any portion of a ttitical of significant wildlife habitat. ? ? ?Yes ?No a Applicatiott of pesticide of herbicide more than twice a year, other ? ? ?Yes ?No than lot agricultural purposes. Other Impatts: none ? ? ?Yes ?No 5. Will Proposed Action substantially affect hom-threatened or horn-endahgeted species? }tRNO ?YES n/a n/a n/a Examples that would apply to column 2 s Proposed Action would substantially inter(ete with any resident of ? ? ?Yes ?No tnigratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. + Proposed Action tequires the removal of more than 10 acres ? ? ?Yes ?No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetatiom. IMPACT ON AGnICULtUnAL LANb hrmouncris 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? XX7NO ?YES n/a n/a n/a Examples that would apply to column 2 The proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ? ? ?Yes ?No land (includes tropland, hayfields, pasture, vhtevatd, orchard, etc.) 8 i 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 6 Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ? ? ?Yes ?No Agticuitufal land. 4 the proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ? ? ?Yes ?No bf agricultural land or, If located in an AgtlcultUtal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land 6 The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ? ? ?Yes ?No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to Increased runoff) + Other impacts: none + ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACt ON AEstHETIC tir:SOUhCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? Imo ?YES (if necessary, use the Visual tAt Addendum ih Section 617.21, Appendix B.) n/a n/a n/a tramples that would apply to column 2 s Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ? ? ?Yes ?No of In sharp contrast to current surrounding land. use patterns, whether man-Made of natural. A Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ? ? ?Yes ?No Aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. a Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ? ? ?Yes ?No streehing of scenic views I;nowh to be Important to the Area. a Other Impacts! none ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPAct ON Nlstonlc ANb Anc11AtoLocICAL AESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action Impact Ahy site or structure of historic, pre- historic or pAleontologlul importaocef XR9N0 OYES n/a n/a n/a Whiplo that would Apply to column J S Proposed Action occurrihd wholly of pAttially within or substantially ? ? ?Yes ?No cohtIgUbUS to Any facility bt site listed on the State or National (register of historic plates. A Any impact to an Archaeological site of fossil bed located within the ? ? ?Yes ?No project site. + Proposed Action will occUf In an Area designated As sensitive for ? ? ?Yes ?No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. + other Impacts: none L1 ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE ANb hECpEATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spAces or recreational opportunities? ti<Amples that would apply to column 2 X)]NO ?YES n/a n/a n/a • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ? ? ?Yes ?No + A major reduction of an open space Important to the community. ? ? ?Yes ?No + other Impacts: none ? ? ?Yes ?No 9 IMPACT O&ANSPO"TATION 1 2 Small to 3 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation syyst-ems? Moderate PLargeal Mitil gated, car, mp, -1 7 EiAhtples that would apply to column 2 lie €NO ?YES Impact Impact Project Change n/a a Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. n/a n/a Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. El ?Yes ?No Other Impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No ti nil e ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affec energy supply? I the commuhity's sources of fuel or PxAmples that would apply to column XXINO ?YES n/a n/a ~ n/a Proposed Action mll cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the munitipality. ? ? ?Yes LINO • Proposed Action will requite the creation or extension of an energy ? Itansmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family El ?Yes ?No tesidphces of to serve a Major commercial or Industrial use. J1 Other er impacts: -h l ? ? ?Yes ?No NOISE ANb ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, hoISe, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Actiohl - XXINO ?YES n/a n/a EtAmples that would apply to column 2 n/a 9 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. El 11 ?Yes ?No 4 odott Will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). 1 proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ? ?Yes ?No ambient holse levels for holte outside of structures. El El ?Yes (--]No + Proposed Action will remove hatural barriers that would act as a ? hoise streen. El- []Yes ?No + Other Impacts: none ? El ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PUBLIc HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? XNNO OYES n/a n/a n/a Ptcamples that Would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ? substances (La. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of ? ?Yes ?No Atcldeht of upset conditions, of there may be a chronic low level dischatge of emission. i Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" In any ? form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, El ?Yes ?No Infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural [l gas or other flammable liquids. El ?Ycs ONo t PropoQsed action may result In the excavation or other disturbance ? withE 2,000 feet ON Site used for the disposal of solid of hazardous El ?Ycs ONO waste. 8 Other impacts: none 0 - ? ?Ycs ?No 10 • 1 -2-3 IMPACT ON GROWTH ANO CHAnACTEn Small to Potential Can Impact Be OP COMMUNITY on NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By id. Will ptopbsed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change XJVN0 DYES tkAmpies that would apply to column 2 n/a n/a n/a I Tile permaheht population of the city, town or village in which the ? ? Dyes UNo project Is lotated is likely to grow by more than 5%. + the mttnicipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ? El Dyes DNo will itftreaie by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. / Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ? ? ?Yes ?No I Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. D ? ?Yes ?No I Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ? ? Dyes ONo j Or areas of historic importance to the community. + bevelopment Will create a demand for additional community services ? ? ?Yes DNo (e.g. Schools, police and fire, etc.) I Pfoposed Action will set an Important precedent for future projects. ? El Dyes E]No + Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ? ? ?Yes []No + other Itnpatts: hone ? El Elyes []No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO OYES It Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or it YOU Cannot betertnine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS kesponsibilily of Lead Agency Past t muSl 6e ptepafed if bhe ut mote lmpacl(s) Is tonsidered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be hifligAled. Inslfutlloto bistusS the following lot each Impact Identified in Column 2 of Part 2: i. Bdefly describe the impact. NONE 2. besttibe (if applicable) how the impAtt could be mitigated or reduced Ina small to moderate impact by project change(s). 9. Based on the Infoimatiotl available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. to answer the question of importance, consider: I The probability of the Impact occurring + the duration of the impact I Its Irreversibility, Including pennanently lost resources of value I Whether the impact can or will be controlled I Tire regional consequence of the impact + Its potential divergence from local needs and goals I Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) NONE 11 (d.iA I I (2187)-gc 617.21 SEQR ~ Appendix; 13 State environmefttal Quality Neview Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 1 t of Part 2 of the pull EAp. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) f. Would the project be visible from: 0-'/e t/4 -1/2 112.-3 3-5 5+ + A parcel of land which is dedicated to and availableNO ? ? ? ? ? to the public tot the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic»qualitles? + An overlook of parcel of land dedicated to publicNO ? ? ? ? ? observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or StateNO ? ? ? ? ? Registers of Historic Places? + State Parks? NO ? ? ? ? ? The State rarest Preserve? NO ? ? ? ? ? + National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? NO ? ? ? ? ? National Natural Landmarks and other outstandingNO ? ? ? ? ? natural features? National Park Service lands? NO ? ? ? ? ? Rivers designated as National or State Wild, ScenicNO ? ? ? ? ? or Recreational? 4 Any transpottatlon corridor of high exposure, suchNO ? ? ? ? ? as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? A A governmentally established of designated InterstateNO ? ? ? ? ? of inter-county foot (tail, or one formally proposed for establishment of designation? 1 A site, area, lake, tesetvolt or highway designated asNO ? ? ? ? ? Scenic? + Municipal park, of designated open space? NO ? ? ? ? ? S County road? NO ? ? ? ? ? A State? NO ? ? ? ? ? Local road? NO ? ? ? ? ? 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ?Yes XXGNo 3. Ate any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year C during which the project will be visible? ?Yes XX$t'lo 1 bsSCRIPTION Op RXISTI a VISUAL pNVIRONMENT • ` 4. prom each Item checked In question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding envitonment. Within "A Mlle *11 mile lissentially undeveloped ? El porested ? ? Agricultural ? Suburban residential Industrial Commercial ? ? Urban ? ? River, Lake, Pond El ? Cliffs, Overlooks ? - ? Designated Open Space Q Plat Hilly El F1 ? ? Mountainous ? ? Other NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Ate there visually similar projects within: NONE *Yz mile ?Yes ?Ho +1 miles ?Yes ?No *2 miles ?Yes ?No f +3 miles ?Yes ?No + Distance from project site Are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. RxpdSURR 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NONE NOTE: When user dala is unavailable or Unknown, use best estimate. coNTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY NONE Holidays! Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ? ? ? ? Involved in recreational activities ? ? ? ? Routine travel by residents ? ? ? ? At a residence ? ? ? ? At worksite ? ? ? ? Other NONE ? ? ? ? 2 JAMES BITSES Lighthouse Road Attorney at Law Box 1407 Southold, N.Y. 11971 765-5700 (516) March 7, 1996 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Lot Line Change - Bitses Premises: SCTM #1000-87-5-21.1 and 21.2 Sirs: Would you kindly schedule the above matter for discussion before the Planning Board at your earliest convenience. Thanking you for your courtesy, I am, Yours truly, James Bitses JB:afw 3115196 MR-~i~s ~ WI P.Q. @ 3(ig Wank secs;aN. ~1.~a.v~s ~"a ~~d¢15211 r-o-W`~zTawc~. A, so ms s` su6~9t o',9 e u, ~n s~.e~ e-r~' lb~ (in-Q C ~nnvtn ~p wte~ as lam- mss` \ ,;v-t~ ~ la-r-s ~AA~~ t~/~n~ ~`2. J'nuS~' Cott~Sl~Q, ~b'~- l.~v~o a~pl+cu~~~; enn-n fad me~lQ. `^p7ry-~i CuX~ 5-e~ `iM4oC a ~yQ. rFgV; (1 S~f(„ V'r0<Q, ~ 5 lc~S trnc,,x~ ia~ +l7`S fQO~eW `~fo1 used SUeb; JA S; an . LS Inp I 11996 a..' 3 a 1 JAMES BITSES Lighthouse Road Attorney at Law Box 1407 Southold, N.Y. 11971 765-5700 (516) May 31st, 1995 PLANNING BOARD TOWN BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 RE: OFFER OF RIGHT OF WAY TO TIDEWATER FOR PUBLIC LAUNCHING RAMP MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD PARCEL# 87-05-21,3&.4 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, I OFFER THE FOLLOWING: 1- A fifty foot right of way from Main Bayview Road to tidewater on Corey Creek approximately 900' in length, comprising about one and one half acres. . IN EXCHANGE I EXPECT THE FOLLOWING: 2- An appropriate zone for a shipyard on five acres. 3- An appropriate zone for an adjoining motel on ten acres. This is an offer to offer, giving rise to no claims or rights to either party during informal discussion. The suggested facility makes sense in Southold where the public has, in effect, been excluded from use of the local tidewaters simply by the sale of the entire waterfront for residential purposes. The Cove development adjoins the proposed development to the west, so there is precedent for the above proposal, which, incidentally will open up Peconic Bay for recreational marine use. iF Yours truly, J~ 2 M fl James Bitses+n~n BOARD Map enclosed 9L 6"0 6 OIL 1,151k. o I I , 4 I,: sc>: r~ r?' 14. r 130 190 ` t ` ~ ~ ~ qi~~ ,'I Inf. 1 ~ ` L'~, 1 ~ 1 N t F~Ckc O l f ob- 41250 s. P4/LSOe.r. , 339 5,0 pe. .P I I I c- I 1 N'. 4 I•r.r+Yil ` 1<a rn~ ~I Iz>.,,, IIII FINS= 17 d ~t zS.o iz5o ~III~ -lab.? d ?n IGr' M Y l ~t • f) 1 k '~•in7 n.. ao -1 a mv"+d J01 e 1;' i°79 Er 1. t:l 5'ru)411, 1'J Ao~'larrr7il f3OOrtri; !~Y n~, r-: nr% ; 1rt^~. r'lr pr'n ,rr{ r)/l^[YF ::at3M/ri 9•bove-i f. r; : ''11 r, grrrl PJr•I- r'JY,r t'7^ 'tt nrErvp 1_cJ r 41, r - +-~7,5 1. 0 -4C Lam, F ~ ; l~ .T I f G~o•c ~ y ~,pEE/C C!~i~ I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS J Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53D95 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 7779 Southold, New York 11971 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald = q Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 26, 1994 James Bitses P.O. Box 1407 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Proposed Lot Line Changes for Katherine Bitses Southold SCTM# 1000-87-5-21.1 & 21.2 Dear Mr. Bitses: The Planning Board has received a report dated October 24, 1994, from the Board of Trustees in regard to the above mentioned property. The Trustees have reviewed the site and wetland area shown on the subdivision map dated August 17, 1994. Bruce Anderson, consultant for the Trustees, has flagged and numbered the wetland areas on the property. Please have your surveyor revise the subdivision map to reflect the flagged wetland areas. The Planning Board and the Trustees will proceed with the review of this proposal upon receipt of maps showing the flagged wetland areas. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sinc~ Melissa Spiro Planner enc. suaF Albert J. Krupski, President Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson k P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Carrell ' Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel + ^ Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Melissa Spiro, Planning Board FROM: John Holzapfel, Vice-President, Board of Trustees DATE: Monday, October 24, 1994 RE: Katherine Bitses Upon inspecting this parcel with Bruce Anderson and myself, we have flagged and numbered the wetlands areas and feel they should be placed on the survey. p [ i OW sueF • ~gOFF0j/( • P Albert J. Krupski, President p~ 00 Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President _Z yc 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson °w x P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Garrell WO Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenzel Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Melissa Spiro, Planning Board FROM: John Holzapfel, Vice-President, Board of Trustees# DATE: Monday, October 24, 1994 RE: Katherine Bitses Upon inspecting this parcel with Bruce Anderson and myself, we have flagged and numbered the wetlands areas and feel they should be placed on the survey. J; OCT 24 iPgµ s0 Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. FOCT 1 2 1994 Deerfield Green, Montauk Highway, P.O. Box 958, Water Mill, New York 1 76 958 (516) 726-1919 Fax: (516) 726-4471 T011 % " SOUTHOLD Bruce Anderson, M.S., President U October 7, 1994 Southold Town Trustees Town Hall P. O. Box 1179 :~M Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Subdivision of Katherine Bitses off 2 SCTM #1000-87-3-21.3, 21.4 and 21.5 SOUTHDear Board Members, PtAtJNJAs requested, a site inspection of the above referenced property took place on October 6, 1994. The purpose of the site inspection was to determine whether or not wetlands exist on subject parcel and, if so, to delineate their extent as to be eventually placed on a survey. Subject parcel fronts Bayview Road and an existing work road provides access to the shoreline of Correy Creek. Our inspection of the wooded portion of the site revealed two depressions which were dominated by Phragmites. In my opinion, the occurrence of Phragmites is indicative of prior disturbance and since both depressions lacks significant abundance of wetland indicator species, these areas should not be considered freshwater wetlands. However, the eventual development of these lots may be problematic in terms of siting a properly functioning septic system. The principle reasons for this, includes the fact that these areas are low lying and the existing grades within these depressions may be quite close to the water table. Also, soils found in these locales appear to be highly silty and somewhat hydrillic. Therefore, it is recommended that care be taken in the review of this subdivision to insure that the required test holes are located within the areas where septic systems will be eventually constructed. A review of the survey prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl, P. C. last amended August 17, 1994 with respect to existing field conditions reveals wetland coverage to have been underestimated. Lot #5 which contains 11.1 acres contains extensive tidal wetlands which receive tidal inundation through mosquito ditches which are ultimately connected to the waters of Correy Creek via a 12" diameter culvert located on the eastern shorefront of subject parcel. Standing water was observed in these ditches and the ditches supports the tidal wetland grass, Spartina alternii fora. Enclosed herewith please find a copy of the Van Tuyl survey showing the approximate extent of tidal wetlands. Thirty numbered flags were placed in the field from south to north. Wetland flags were placed where tidal wetland plants including Phragmites spp., Spartina alternii fora, Spartina patens and Baccharis halimifolia where dominant in combination excluding monoclonal stands of Phragmites. Having thoroughly analyzed the existing site conditions I recommend the following: (1) that the eventual siting of septic systems be considered within the overall planning process; and (2) that the proposed resubdivision amending the meets and bounds of the four lots adjacent to main Bayview Road be reviewed within the context of the overall site including the extent of tidal wetlands found on Lot #5. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have further questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Z64C~ /J/ Bruce A. Anderson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman = Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. a P. O- Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald ~j . Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO-. Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees FROM: Melissa Spiro /)W Planner RE: Proposed Lot Line Changes for Katherine Bitses SCTM# 1000-87-5-21.3, 21.4 and 21.5 DATE: September 16, 1994 Enclosed is a copy of the revised map (Aug. 17, 1994) for the above mentioned lot line changes. As requested in your May 10, 1994 report, the applicant has had the wetland areas flagged for your review. enrc. ~lBF ht5 SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: 61251 94-1 SENDER: J 1OA SUBJECT: ckcA vnc,.~ SCTMn: 0~ 2i.4 42-k.5 COMMENTS: I co`?~vS cr re0 i,P Cy vw~~ ML6 2 51994 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS' i Richard G. Ward, Chairman j l Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. . f Southold, New York 11971 j Mark S. McDonald 9 Fax (516) 765-3136 i Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE 'I May 11, 1994 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD James Bitses P.O. Box 1407 Southold, New York 11971 f RE: Proposed Lot Line Changes for Katherine Bitses Southold SCTM# 1000-87-5-21.1 & 21.2 Dear Mr. Bitses: The Planning Board has received a report dated May 10, 1994, from the Board of Trustees in regard to the above mentioned property. The Trustees have asked that the wetland areas be flagged in the field,and that the boundaries of these areas be shown on a licensed survey. The Planning Board and the Trustees will proceed with the review of this proposal upon receipt of maps showing the flagged wetland areas. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Mel Spiro Planner enc. f i ,~FicE Albert J. Krupski, President • O~OS~fFOC~COG • Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President 53095 Main Road ° William G. Albertson Co P.O. Box 1179 = Martin H. Garrell O .te Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel y?j O~ Telephone (516) 765-1892 Ol ~O Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD TO: Melissa Spiro, Planner Planning Board FROM: Albert Krupski, Jr. President Board of Trustees RE: Katherine Bitses SCTM #1000-87-5-21.3,21.4,21.5 DATE: May 10, 1994 Please have the property properly flagged for salt and fresh water wetlands and havethat information placed on a licensed survey. The Board can than review the proposal. Thank you. MAY 1 41994 AOANNING TOWN 14 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. N ` " „1 ' U Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards= x fr Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees FROM: Melissa Spiro Planner RE: Proposed Lot Line Changes for Katherine Bitses SCTM# 1000-87-5-21.3, 21.4 and 21.5 DATE: March 23, 1994 Enclosed please find a copy of the map dated March 10, 1994, for the above mentioned lot line changes. The map indicates one wetland area on the entire parcel. Please verify that the wetland has been accurately delineated on the map. In addition, please review the site to determine if any other wet areas or wetlands are located on the property. Brief background of application: On June 12, 1979, the Planning Board approved a four lot minor subdivision for Katherine Bitses. (See enclosed copy of map.) The subject application is to change the lot lines of the above mentioned lots by shifting each lot to the west. The lot line changes involve the four lots mentioned above in addition to the land adjacent to the four parcels that is also owned by Bitses. The application is for five lot line changes. However, all of the lot line changes have been shown on one map. enc. tPit~i~s' SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: ,3 2Z- f SENDER: , SUBJECT: i COMMENTS: 2 lu v 1 szd /Yk-2~5 p MUHII)lm PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ) Richard G. Ward, Chairman a' t Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards _ Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 16, 1994 James Bitses P.O. Box 1407 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Proposed Lot Line Changes for Katherine Bitses Southold SCTM# 1000-87-5-21.1 & 21.2 Dear Mr. Bitses: I I have received the authorization from Katherine Bitses to allow you to act as her agent for the proposed lot line applications in addition to the outstanding portion of the application fee. j Please refer to my letter of February 16, 1994, in which I list the additional information that is required for the proposed lot line changes. It appears that you have complied with Number 1 of my letter, but not with Numbers 2, 3 and 4. Upon submission of this information, the map will be forwarded to the Board of Trustees for verification of the wetland areas. i Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Melissa Spiro Planner I enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 7,Y P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE February 16, 1994 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD James Bitses P.O. Box 1407 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Proposed Lot Line Changes for Katherine Bitses Southold SCTM# 1000-87-21.1 & 21.2 Dear Mr. Bitses: I have received the maps last dated February 2, 1994, that you submitted on February 7, 1994. As we discussed, the Planning Board will be processing your proposal as five (5) lot line changes, all of which will be shown on one map. The application fee for a lot line change is $50. Thus, a fee of $250 is required for your applications. We have received $200 from you, therefore, you have an outstanding balance of $50. Until this is submitted, your application will not be considered complete. Due to the fact that the application is incomplete, the maps have not been reviewed by the Planning Board. However, please note the following in regard to the proposed application: 1. You must submit authorization from Katherine Bitses to allow you to act as her agent for the proposed-applications. 2. There is a discrepancy between the tax map numbers indicated for the parcel in the Real Property tax map and those shown on your map. The Real Property shows the subject parcel as SCTM# 1000-87-5-21.3, 21.4 & 21.5. The map shows the subject parcel as SCTM# 1000-87-5-21.1 & 21.2. Please have your surveyor clarify. 3. The existing r-o-w (adjacent to the land of Perry) is currently part of Lot Number 5. It is not located on a separate parcel of land as indicated on the map. The notation on the map in regard to the existing and net change in area must be revised to show the area of the r-o-w as part of Lot Number 5. James Bitses February 16, 1994 4. As previously requested, you have revised the maps so that the property boundaries of all parcels involved in the lot line changes are shown on the map. However, the contours have not been indicated for the area shown as Lot Number 5. Please have your surveyor indicate the contours for the entire property. t Upon submission of the application fee and the above mentioned information, the application will be deemed complete. At that time, the map will be forwarded to the Board of Trustees for verification of the wetland areas. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely Melissa S p Planner PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. y'' ^ P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax (516) 765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards 3 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 16, 1994 James Bitses P.O. Box 1407 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Proposed Lot Line Changes for Katherine Bitses Southold SCTM# 1000-87-21.1 & 21.2 Dear Mr. Bitses: I have received the maps last dated February 2, 1994, that you submitted on February 7, 1994. As we discussed, the Planning Board will be processing your proposal as five (5) lot line changes, all of which will be shown on one map. The application fee for a lot line change is $50. Thus, a fee of $250 is required for your applications. We have received $200 from you, therefore, you have an outstanding balance of $50. Until this is submitted, your application will not be considered complete. Due to the fact that the application is incomplete, the maps have not been reviewed by the Planning Board. However, please note the following in regard to the proposed application: i 1. You must submit authorization from Katherine Bitses to allow you to act as her agent for the proposed.applications. 2. There is a discrepancy between the tax map numbers indicated for the parcel in the Real Property tax map and those shown on your map. The Real Property shows the subject parcel as SCTM# 1000-87-5-21.3, 21.4 & 21.5. The map shows the subject parcel as SCTM# 1000-87-5-21.1 & 21.2. Please have your surveyor clarify. 3. The existing r-o-w (adjacent to the land of Perry) is currently part of Lot Number S. It is not located on a separate parcel of land as indicated on the map. The notation on the map in regard to the existing and net change in area must be revised to show the area of the r-o-w as part of Lot Number 5. I James Bitses February 16, 1994 4. As previously requested, you have revised the maps so that the property boundaries of all parcels involved in the lot line changes are shown on the map. However, the contours have not been indicated for the area shown as Lot Number 5. Please have your surveyor indicate the contours for the entire property. 1 Upon submission of the application fee and the above mentioned information, the application will be deemed complete. At that time, the map will be forwarded to the Board of Trustees for verification of the wetland areas. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely ` Melissa 0 Planner r~5 SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: 3 13 I I SENDER: JQ/mc5 b j • seS 1 SUBJECT: Ala "Kk- 81-r $e•S LL SCTM#: COMMENTS: l,fnY(U ~V _ +D o-~ctQ/j o O MAR 41994 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD i • JAMES BITSES Lighthouse Road Attorney at Law Box 1407 Southold, N.Y. 11971 765-5700 (516) P Ilkle t«s d ? ~~C '4l~r'S all 7Ze<-2 Pee w~ a i~a 61te6 01017dwa" /W& S../- GaSe per 1 r ~i ,~cc~F, c.c M~s SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: 2 I (6 (9 y SENDER: JCCVYl2 S \ SeS \ SUBJECT: rts< 5 5 S i o lV SCTM#: ~1(.(.4 21,Z COMMENTS: dor FEB I T 1994 LA SrnrrlW N. Y.N. 1 U. N'. s001 solfin ln.l W, Urrd. -1,4 Ce.tnrnr rtilnu o...... -Indbldnd er Cnrpm oleo (Sloth 56.r,) taNfOlt Yoltill tAp*vi* (1lf00ItlNllm 1111! INftpUMtNt-1111! tpU116 MoUtb pt Wth br tAwrtns limy. 112U() 595 ***llO NOT YUI3LISl1*** 0 ttT)SINt)EN<UITE,nladelhe FIRST dnyo(dANUARY nineteenhluldtedaudNINF:TY-ONE I ~ bL'11wELN JAMES 13l_'1'SPIS residing at k~ H LH1,11' IRMISE ROAD ISOU 'I'll (AID, N. Y. pntly of [lie first Intl, .4114 'ftATtiEItiNP; 131TSFS residing at ~ae "lt' I,ICIITIIOTISE ROAD SOU'T HOW), N. Y. 11971 pafly 61 1110 lecond patio witNt.§SEtllf that the Pittyy of the lull part, In ennsldetsiton of tell dollars and other valuable eonsiderstion Paid by the Nfly of the fecehd pat(, doe! 11"d, Ittnot Ind relpme unto the patty of the lemnd patf, 111e heirs of euccamoti And asolem lit llte patly Uf'Ihe'i1E1o1 d'oil fatebet, b~ s BALL thal eeflahi lot, bbltc4 of pales) o laid, with file buildings slid Improvements Iheteott Owfell, situate, by ying Alld belryl lit IM'i'owlt oI Southoldo SUtfolk Cotinty and Stale of New York, to b oulided atld demt•.Hbed a)9 tollows: BEGINNING nt n biowlfileht on Lire Sotithet•ly title of Matn Unyview ilond :11. to Nottlteantetly t;ortiet bt the land of Perry, Bald ImIlit by tie-lhie being NOR-I'll 75 EGRE.t'S, fig MINU'T'ES, 30 SECONOS WP;ST, 242. 72 feet from Ute pniot of inler- -'t"f •t` edtlolt tit the Notthetly Tlne of Will 13ayview (load with I.he Westerly line of "e Ictvtln Drive: new No UNNING THNNCE ALONG SAID SUIT' 10,0'Itl_,Y I,1NE OF tiAYVIEW ROAD '1.'WO C(AMSF 1 SOUTH 64 llEGREESy 07 MfNO I't;S;' UU Sf,CUN -jS, EAST 9. 67 T; 3) SOU'T'H GO Uf;UREES, (12 M1NU'`P.,1 140 :81ri '61`4 DS )VAST, 586. 72 ti-mv;,1.' '1'O 'i-mi; ,AND Otr JAMES SITSES: )TSTRIC7 X00 171IENCE ALONG WI) LANI)o TWO COURSES: I SOUTH 29 011'MOMEl1o 57 MINU'T'ES, 20 SECONDS WES'T', 300 17-MET; EC'TION 0 SOUTH 48 DNOftEESo OU MINUTINS, 00 SIIWCONUS WPISY, 870 !rrE-1' MOItI? ()11. 87. 00 'ESS TO '1.'1111 t )itOWARY 11113,11 WATkAl MARK OF COREY CREf;IC; ILOCK: THENcP NOR'1'HWES'TERL$ At.,ONG SAII) 111011 WATER MAIM ANTI AI,1)N(; '1'~1'ci 5.00 wAS'rER1,Y SL)(_1ttP; Otr A CEttTAtN BOA')' BASIN OF"CANAL, 900 FIsE'r, M(MV: ()If HESS TO LAND OF A. A..FINK, Jlt,,; Tl1ENCE NORTHEASTIPM1,Y AI.,ON(I FINK'S AND 550 I"N'NT MORE Oil 1,E98t TO SAID LAND Ot(' VERRY; 21. OG3 L'TTIrNCE ALONG SAID 1,ANI) O.r PERRY, .IU 1)C;UttEES, 11U MINU'T•EFi 00 SECONIi,S SAS1'1173U 1740",".1' TO TIM VOIN't' Olt fILACN OF 13EUINNINU. AtE tfR MW took, toUNtY bk O .1'.r C)f,lc E#t lt~rE Or NE~ Ulf lift .11/ ~ counrr or (Illy of 9 o(il.l,tt.&" 19 4, W Y before file Oil file day of pefsonally tlfoc 19 , brLnr n,r ~~i!/r4 sir l,rrsonnlly C:Illlr , / In it e llcttoWil In Ipe file inrlividUll described itt and 4aho Ir, file lulmvtt In Ile the individual lcscribrd in .1n l «iin execllled the fnrrggning hlsitfilllrlll, atlrl adclumleflud Ih.1l rxecule(I life fmcgning i11NI111111rilf, :Ind arIoin%vIr,IRr,l f6,1 txrculyd life snole. C8CC UIrcI Ibe S111IC. - I Irl ENE b. IIOnNE NolerY Public, Stele of New Yelk f]ualifi delis Suflo k Count Camnllsslon Expkee May 22t 17 7, ltAt1 bR NEW Vbkk, COUNtY of 491 Stktk or NEW Vokk, CoUNtt, or Off the day of 19 before u1c (fi the da of petsoually cave y 11 br(ntr• nn• Io file kho" ll, w110, being by file duly Nivof fi, die) drpose afid file Itlsc ra111e say, flint Ile ttsl(les a( No. wli Ntl6Srrihll lg evilness to the fvrcgaing bring Ill. iii ail.% hnltt ( 1m prtsonallq 1alulhdcrl, whn, bring ry fire ,luh flint lie Is file t Nwntu, Jill Ill. and say Iba( he trsidcs it Nn. that be Icnws of , the tolpntainll descihrd Ill and trhicb exectlied (Ile foregolllg 1110*1niCtlt( that he to Ile Idin s the seal of Sniff cntpolnUml, Mat file Seal anixed drsctihrd fn hull teho exctidrd file ,rnrrgnmg finslnnornl : to said hislrulileul is such rotputnle Seal; 11111 it iv.11 to 111.11 he, swirl sfitrsrtibing rviluess, runs pirsetll and sa,l am-ted Otto, Aud flud ttl e1S g 1td rd o1IM1e 1 e etof by clihe orr~ F. at the s.1nlc little rSubscribed 111 altnaole Ili-it as lie, wilness lhef rlm t r -rA 1111IgItlll Illfl pUlr 1(Irrib Atilt (:u1ItN.ANI At'AfNSI' (i11ANivIPN At:ts hi OcKp) o5. '7, (10 0 N LE No. m ncx (1 lot 021. 001 (IY,1. tm (oUNly oN 1MV,, O1'' S(1l11'11O1,1), suIrI;()l,l; uV 0 0 O 0 un W ' 'l1Nhnr, r, 311t11,1,rU Iiprl JnS ~b1 fr,/ ~'h / ll q~ hl Nef, l.i Sr in.l.r.l N. Y. N. 1 .0. tmm tosr e.,(fin fnd W, brtd. «Irl. Cnvhum'p;m' rr...nnr', Anr-hd~.tda.l n. Cmp..ruhn IShrl, it..,.) toNlUlk VoUN I.AWY N 110610-Thd kill! INS1pUMENf-11uS INSipUMEoloUtb 01 USEb er I-Awvtns onto. V17 li208PC595 'k**1)0 NOT l'U131,1811*** I ' tl11SINbEN"fU1tE,utade the FIRST dayofJANUARY niuctcen humped a"dN1Nr:'l'Y-()NN ' bftWE~N JAMES ill'L'SI;S residing al. lu•N I,l(11.1'1'11o11Sr; !l(1A1) SO(l'1.'llot,i), N. Y. pntly of the firs( pall, tnd '11ATHBRINm 13I'C9rS residing at LIGHTHOUSE ROAD SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 harry bf the Second hark, WttNt mittllt !lint the hatlyy Of the fit!! Marl, Iti eonsidetnlion of fell dollar! and ofher valnnhle m"AtIrrstion paid by the pally bf Ibe Aecoh haN, dot! beteby ktnnt and telew unto lilt' party of tilt' "Mtld part, the heirs. 4 of SUccowte And AstigUS Ill tilt Imij Ht'!hE'1Etodd pbkl (ore'vet, bA LL fret eoabi plot, bbIOCA of bafcel of land, with the btdidi"gs and 6tiprovt'"e"ts fheteou eterfed, situate, Ar ytug Alid bet"g In the'towti of Southold, SUffol.lc Comity and Stale of New Vorlc, fs 17 outided and deserlbed YjOollows: 13EGINNING at ttmonumelit oil the Smitherl•y 1111e of Will 13ayview llontl nl. it, Northeasterly tot-het' of the land of ferry, said (mint by lie-Hne beinf; NORTH 7 MOIIMMS, 1i9 MfNUl'88, 30 SMCONllS WfSS'1', 242. 72 feet [foot the point of inlrt-- w~'t.ra •t` e(!tlou Of 11111 Not-thetty Idle of Mahl 13ayview Ilond with the Westerly tine of tt£w No CUNNING 'I'HF'NCE ALONG; SAID SOU'TurRLY LINE OF 13AYVIEW ROAD TWO CoM Mr. SOUTH 64 DEGREES, 07 Ml'NU'1T - S;' 00 Sr:CON' IJ5, r'AS`r 9. 67 M NMI,; ?1 SOUTH 60 llMO11MMS, Uz MI NOT '>EiS; '40 'Srl(`~)15))S EAST, 59f. 7'l, E'f;ti;'L' 'l o '1'lll? ,AN1J OF JAMES SITSES: - " I t ISTRIC7 too 171INNCt' ALUNO NAM LANII 11.1W0C4ovttsr;S: 1'SOUT11 29 bEOf11ES, 57 MINUTES, 20 SECONDS WNST, 300 FEET; FICTION') SOU'T11 413 UMOttMMS, UU MINUI.Uh;S, 00 gNCONDS WNST, WM rr;Err M(mu: (m 37.00 jr'SS To 'TI11; t_IIt111NAnv L1IGH WA11"s'11 MARK OF COREY CllmmR; LOCK: THE NC M; NOIt'1'HWES'1'E[ILY ALONG SAII) mml WATER NIAIIK Am) nl,t)N(; 'FVi; 5.00 IvAS•1'ERL.Y S13r)CtM; OF A CERTAIN BOAT BASIN Or'(:ANAL, 900 FC,'CT, Molif1; (M ESS TO LAND Or A. A. FINK, JIL '1'111,NCE NORTHEASTr'llf-,Y AI_,UNG V INK'S OTS: ~ANJ) 55o FM1ET MURE OR LE;SSI 'ro SAID I,ANU OF PERRY; 21. 003: t'HMNCM ALONG SAID LAND Or PERRY, 10 Dli;GIl1;ES, Uo MMU'TE^, 09 Sr('mm,, ,AS'I',~ 30 ITME' L TO THE POINT Olt 111,AC.'r; OF BEGINNING. FEB 17 M4 PAtt bt NtW Vtlkk, eawty bt S 1 .rUl,fc llso Stmt o? NEW ro oufltr of bn fill. :1 djldy bt 9otruttk Iq~(, Irrlote file the lite d.1yV Iv personally came 6rb,fv nr prrsonally ca111r . 1 In nee Iknorvil to Ile file individual flesrrillerl in awl ~lillo to lite knomo in hr the individual rlcsrlll,rrl in .111,11 w6n exectlled lite Inrrggoiog inslrttnlebl, and .1cloanvlclgrd Ih.1l rxrcolrrl the foregoing insllbtucnl, and arkumvlr,lor,l Ih.1l exectiled Ille Sattle. exernfed flip saner. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I IEl ENE b. I IORNE Nolery rltbgo, Stofe of New York Quelihedoln Sul(olk Cnunt Commisslon ,VkesMey22, f~ ltAtt bt NEW Vbpk, COUNty bt wa oAtt bt NEW Vo11k, tOUNty Or Olt the day of 19 before lite fhl 1111, day of 19 l,rfnir mr persobally rattle prwIf,1Ily valor to me kuowll, who, being fly file duly Sworn, did depose and .111, s1thscri11,tug ailncss to the forrgotng iusn mnrnl, Alit' say 16-11 Ile fl.sl(les -11 No. whom 1 and prrsou-11111 acquainled, %V111), I,eillg 1113, file dnl~ Ilml he Is the sworn, (fill drpnee and say Thal hr tesides al No. of Illal he moots Ilse tolpntalinll J"clihrd In and ullich txeculed file fotegollig Illshgbllellf ; 111.11 lie to hr Ilse 111,1k ido.1l "'o,", the seal of said eotilola l Intl: Ili-it Ilse Seal rillixed drsrti11m,l fu hnd tcho exeeuted lilt, 'folegning ingtion rot ; to said blslrnlfienl Is such rolpot-1le Beall that It ivas so 111.11 he, said su11iseihiog wlfltvs4, WAS presrnl and sill 111110 by bldtt bl Ilic boat(l of dit6elnrs of said corpbr-1- execute file saole; anrf that he, 5.1i,) Rillo-5" Linn, mid Ihal lie Signed It n:lftle Illetelo by like otder. -11 file sane little subscribed It name as winless thefefn. CM Illltykhl I1111 P'lllr fllrrl tr(Ilf)N 0117. (10 01111 C01VNANI ACAtN-1 (iltANtii1P$ ACis ifOCK (M). 00 Ittt No. t Ifit ' 021. 011.1 OY.1. ool aluN(v off towN Or :SOU1,1101 ) st lcf 11,1: W L LL LL 0 O Y i 0 n t Al Nl1 ~l//y1'V l i/IBS Il ~ 111 Nv~ 7 0 SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: a141g4 SENDER: il,rn b fse-s SUBJECT: <zthm o- 6 fiSeS LL_ C:AN SCTM#: F-7-5- 2 - 2.1• I t ZJ• 2 COMMENTS: Z Y-c vISe-o( MQ~5 FEB T 1994 SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: I I 19,1 SENDER: I'1CZ SPS SUBJECT: FsPS L'r~ ~I w SCTM#: g~ S al.I d 21 . L COMMENTS: _ C+oS ~I1~CA~ JAN 7 19`x' Ms SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: 93 SENDER: cod Vajh iuSUBJECT: ~,tSes SCTM#: ZI' I tZ COMMENTS: I I'P/v~ 5C'L~ rna P IaJnlg3 ~a~ -Fo Mme. 3:l~S, 1 Oil. him ~ -J°S ' LOQC~ yt IL 1142 Ql'lg Wktj a S DFC 1 6 MS SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: 12-13195 SENDER: J111 g lL I stS SUBJECT: LL cAV ' ` + ZI ` SCTM#: 8-1- ~ -gg 2-I Z COMMENTS: GV~UCJ~ 'ZQp / C ~a Is I93 SJbmi55 ia~'1 n2 c~ o •C.~ec~C. ~ ~aoa • ~-L"f Linc ~r+c•f,~ ~ ~~1u c.~uc9tn\ i~/~ i eLF ~ aye /~noi' (Y''~jl Id 6~~\) I1t-~~L(I 1 / OfQ~N¢` ~~f4pi ICDIY \ N01 /TI I~IL`OU~, ® L EA F - ~ saw~e (I P'/ wa sew} b4clc ~Jrr~y/q3 ,I. Ma13S _ a-f'a/ l~rel r7'd Aoq INc(ae 1,7,nc/ l~~h ~7SlS MR. ~sPS Cq e ih 4-a f~iSCUSS w t~ me, Z reAurv%ec~ CR b.-v Cktc '+o I i } 9 6 s ~~a.:.ni'<..ir.rwNtl."t,.tiYSY.i+' YWVYZiiYYlf RODERICK VAN TUYL, P.C. 218 FRONT STREET GREENPORT, NEW YORK 1 1944 (516) 477-0170 To ouwn thft1jl a Tqo wn ut o 1fni Board DATE Dec. 2 ,1993 'o~i, ~i SUBJECT Bitses p Copies of proposed line-change maps, Bayview. q, 3I 93 _T- cA MR. ~SaS I % woo\\ nod' ^ p~ Y''e.3'% ewel uy-- 1 rece~f C, carnPle+e_ aP4"~c tbv. ft- • ML514I2 The DrMnq Board Dallas, Texas 75266-0429 FOLD AT TO FIT DRAWING ROARD ENVELOPE • EW 10P 1902 RODERICK VAN TUYL, P.C. 218 FRONT STREET GREENPORT, NEW YORK 1 1944 (516) 477-0170 ~gwnhgaIlTqout~iolni Board DATE Dec. 2,1993 ~i SUBJECT Bitses p Copies of proposed line-change maps, Bayview. DF_C 3 _ flem x ML5N72 The Drawirg Boarck Dallas, Texas 75266-0429 FOLD AT TO FIT DRAWING BOARD ENVELOPE < EW 10P 2 Wheeler Gwp, Inc., 1962 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Richard O. Ward, Chairman N George Ritchie Latham. Jr. 1 Town Hall, 53Q95 Main Road Bennett Orlowski, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Fdwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax (516) 765 -1823 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 4, 1993 James Bitses P.O. Box 1407 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Proposed Lot Line Changes for Katherine Bitses SCTM# 1000-87-5-21.3, 21.4, 21.5 Dear Mr. Bitses: I have advised the Planning Board that on October 27, 1993, you submitted the Long Environmental Assessment Form and the application fee for the proposed lot line changes for Katherine Bitses. The Board can not accept the application as presented since the proposed change involves the parcel to the rear of the original four (4) lot subdivision (shown as land of James Bitses) and this parcel has not been shown on the map or included in the application. Since the application is incomplete, I am returning your recent submission (one map, Long Environmental Assessment Form and application fee). If you wish to proceed with the lot line changes, both the map and the application materials must be revised to include the above mentioned parcel. I have enclosed another copy of the Lot Line application materials for your convenience. Please call me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Melissa Spkro Planner enc. P~ SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: 10 I2(°hS SENDER: Jim ~ SC5 SUBJECT: l(af Nuuv- Q ISe$ LL ('1l SCTM#: 87-5 -ZI Z P/D 2-1.' COMMENTS: -r - 2- 00- EN F Csame 1' 1 \ aA Sobmt~e~ an 3~3I93 ) c.kec,K in drgwCn-, OCT 2 7 1093 pia-i6-2 (1/87)-7c 617.21 SEOF7 Appendix A Slate Environmental Ouslily, review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Putpose: The full EAr is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderlyrnanner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy In answer. frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or umneasureable. It Is also understond that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental ,nalysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area stay not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is untended to prot.ide-a metl•,-4owhercby applicants and agr° u:ies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive In nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action, kill FAF Compdnenls: The (till EAT" is comprised of three parts: Karl 1: ~1`rovimes bj^ctive data and information about a given project and its site. fly identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer In the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. _ Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may ocrur from a Project or action. It provides tf-tidance as to whether an Impact is likely h1;e •r,,,;dered small to mnderate.nr whether it is a potentially- Taig Giipacl. The form also Identifies whether in unp;ut`can be mitigated or reduced. Part It If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is rise(] to evaluate whether o not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Porlions of EAr completed for this project: El Part 1 ? Part 2 ?Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAl (Parts '1 and 2'and.I if appropriate), and any other supporting Information, and considering both the rmagitude and Importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: 0 A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ? 13. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declatalinn will be prepared.' ? C. The project may tesult In one or more large and fngn(1rtanY °)n••acfs that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration Is only valid for Unlisted Actions MINOR SUBDIVISION - KATHERINE BITSES: LOT LINE CHANGE Name of Action Name of Lead Agency - - Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lea(] Agency litleof Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Sigtuttireof Preparer(I(difft,rentfront responsibleofficer) Dale - - - 1 t ftART 1-PROJECT INFORAW Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered- as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional( information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION MINOR SUBDIVISION - KATHERINE BITSES: LOT LINE CHANGE LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD, SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK CO., NEW YORK NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR KATHERINE BITSES BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS (516) 765-5700 c/o JAMES BITSES.,ESQ. CITY/PO BOX # 1407 SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 NSTATE . Y. 1 ZIP19CO7DE N. 1 NAME OF OWNER (If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS ( ) CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION LOT LINE CHANGE Please Complete 66 Question-Indicate N.A. if no( applicable A. Site Desclription f. Physical setting of overall g project both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land user Durban Dlndustriali OCommercial DResidential (suburban) Mural (non-farm) OForest DAgriculture ?Other 2. Total acreage of project area: -four (4) acres. APPROXIMATE- ACREACE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested XX four (4) acres four (4) acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) - acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: CKWell drained 100 no of site OModerately well drained % of site ?Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS` Land Classification Systern? none acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Dyes DgNo a. What is depth to bedrock? - - - (in feet) 2 •,5•. Apuroximate percentage of proposoect site with slopes: No-10% % ?10-15% % ?15% or gre cr 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ?Yes DMo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ?Yes )Mo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 501 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ?Yes Xlo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ?Yes ]UP0 11. Does project site contain any species of \plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ?Yes XXNo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ?Yes ~Mlo Describe - - - - 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ?Yes No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be Mportant to the community? ?Yes XSNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: none a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes,.ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name none b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? XXIYes ?No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? XNYes ?No b) If Yes, will, improvements be necessary to allow connection? ?Yes )Jo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ?Yes )~ffNo - 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ?Yes XXNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ?Yes )q&o B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor Sac acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 4 Dan acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped n/a acres. d. Length of project, in miles: n /a (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a I. Number Bf off-street parking spaces existing n/a proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour none (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: none One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially n/a Ultimately n/a I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure n/a height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? n1a. ft. 3 2. How much natural material ftck, earth, etc.) will be removed fro ite? tygng tons/cubik yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ?Yes ?No XGSN/A a. If yes, for what intend_ purpose is the site being reclaimed? - - - b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ?Yes ?No / c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ?Yes ?No l 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? none acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ?Yes JQ fNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction n/a months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated n/a (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase - - - month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ?Yes ?No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ?Yes XXIO 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction n/a after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project n /a 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Oyes XMNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ?Yes )9~4 0 a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ?Yes , JMo Type r~ 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ?Yes ?No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a' 100 year flood plain? ?Yes X131No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ?Yes XJ]No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ?Yes ?No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ?Yes ONo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Oyes XMNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? ye'a}s. ' 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ' ?Yes XMNo 1). Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ?Yes XMNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the 16cal ambient noise levels? ?Yes X-lo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Dyes XrMNo If yes , indicate type(s) , 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity n/a gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day n/a gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or rederal funclih'? Oyes XX]No If Yes, explain 4 E a 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ?Yes Xwo WXTown, XX7gX Planning Board )'es ?No lot line change City, Town Zoning Board ?Yes XINNo City, County Health Department ?Yes )MO Other Local Agencies ?Yes XWO Other Regional Agencies ?Yes XXNo State Agencies - ?Yes XXNo Federal Agencies ?Yes XCSNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ?Yes XNNo If Yes, indicate decision required: ?zoning amendment ?zoning variance ?special use permit ?subdivision ?site plan ?new/revision of master plan ?resource management plan ?other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? ae 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? n/a 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ac no rhnngp 5. What.is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? n/a C 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ?Yes XMNo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a mile radius of proposed action? ac 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a r/ mile? )Mes ?No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? n/a: a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ?Yes XNNo 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ?Yes Flo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ?Yes ?No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ?Yes XNNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ?Yes ?No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Spon~Nam{g~, KATHERINE BIT ES Date Oct 24th 1993 Signature 6~"r~~ , Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a stale agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2OJECT IMPACTS AND THEIF~MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) ' • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be im expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site othei examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. + The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. _ Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropri'afe box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column f can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is.not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Examples that would apply to column 2 X3NO DYES n/a n/a n/a • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ? ? ?Yes ?No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ? ? ?Yes ?No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ? ? ?Yes ?No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ? ? ?Yes ?No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ? ? ?Yes ?No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill, ? ? ?Yes ?No • Construction in a designated floodway. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts none ? ? ?Yes ?No 2: Will there ht- an effect It....ry un,que or unusual land forms fobnd on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etcl0 DYES e • Specific land forms: ? ? ?Yes ?No 6 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 n/a n/a n/a 6 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ? ? ?Yes ?No protected stream. 6 Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ? ? ?Yes ?No i Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? XffNO ?YES n/a n/a n/a Examples that would apply to column 2 4 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ? ? ?Yes ?No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. 6 Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ENO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 n/a n/a n/a • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ? ? ?Yes ?No C + Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ? ? ?Yes ?No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ? ? ?Yes ?No gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ? ? ?Yes ?No supply system. * Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ? ? ?Yes ?No + Liquid effluent will be conveye:J off the site to facilities which presently ? ? ?Yes ?No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ? ? ?Yes ?No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ? ? ?Yes ?No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. 6 Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ? ? ?Yes ?No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ? ? ?Yes ?No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ? ? ?Yes ?No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. i Other impacts: none ? ? ?Yes ?No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? X99NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 4 Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ? ? ?Yes ?No 7 2 3 "to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change + Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. El El ?Yes ?No + Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ? ? ?Yes ?No + Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ? ? ?Yes ?No Other impacts: none ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? XXINO OYES n/a n/a n/a Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given 0 ? ?Yes ?No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ? ? ?Yes ?No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ? ? ?Yes ?No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ? ? ?Yes ?No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ? ? ?Yes ?No development within existing industrial areas. • Oth~r impacts: none ? El ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 0 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endan ered species? MNO ?YES n/a n/a n/a Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ? O ?Yes ?No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. + Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ? ? ?Yes ?No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: none ? ? ?Yes ?No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? XRNO OYES n/a n/a n/a Examples that would apply to column 2 + Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ? ? ?Yes ?No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ? ? ?Yes ?No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? X)UNO ?YES n/a n/a n/a Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ? ? ?Yes ?No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change + Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ? ? ?Yes ?No agricultural land. + The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ? ? ?Yes ?No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ? ? ?Yes ?No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) + Other impacts: none ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? )10 OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) n/a n/a n/a Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ? ? ?Yes ?No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. + Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ? ? ?Yes ?No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. + Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ? ? ?Yes ?No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. + Other impacts! 130 ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? XR9NO OYES n/a n/a n/a Examples that would apply to column 2 + Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ? ? ?Yes ?No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. + Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ? ? ?Yes ONo project site. + Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ? ? ?Yes ?No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: none ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 XX]NO OYES n/a n/a n/a • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ? ? ?Yes ?No • A lajor reduction of an open space important to the community. ? ? ?Yes ?No impacts: none ? ? ?Yes ?No 9 IMPACT•OANSPORTATION • 2 3 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? M Small to oderate PLargeal Can Impact 9 Mitigated By Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO DYES Impact Impact Project Change • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. is n/a n/a • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No non ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? XXNO DYES n/a n/a Examples that would apply to column 2 n/a + Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ? transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family ? ?Yes ?No residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. + Other impacts: C 1 : 1 ~ ? ? ?Yes ?No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? - XKINO DYES n/a n/a n a Examples that would apply to column 2 / • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. ? ? ?Yes ?No 4 Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ? • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ? ? ?Yes ?No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: none ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Examples that would apply to column 2 XLiNO DYES n/a n/a n/a • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ? substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of ? ?Yes ?No accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ? form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, ? ?Yes ?No infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed action may result in lhg excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet oN site used fo'r the disposal of solid or hazardous ? ? ?Yes ?NO Waste. • Other impacts: none ? - ? ?Yes ?No 10 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change X~VNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 n/a n/a n/a • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ? ? ?Yes ?No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. °i • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ? ? ?Yes ?No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ? ? ?Yes ?No or areas of historic importance to the community. s • Development will create a demand for additional community services ? ? ?Yes ?No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: none ? ? ?Yes ?No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe tiro impact. NONE 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) NONE 11 ta.ian t2187)-9c 617.21 P SEAR Appendix B 0 State Environmental Quality Review Visual FAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-114 1/4-1/2 1/2-3 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and availableNO ? ? ? ? ? to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to publicNO ? ? Q ? ? observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or StateNO ? ? ? ? ? Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? NO ? ? ? ? ? • The State Forest Preserve? NO ? ? ? ? ? • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? NO ? ? ? ? ? • National Natural Landmarks and other outstandingNO ? ? ? ? ? natural features? • National Park Service lands? NO O ? ? ? ? • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, ScenicNO ? ? ? ? ? or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, suchNO ? ? ? ? ? as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated InterstateNO ? ? ? ? ? or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated asNO ? ? ? ? ? scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? NO ? ? ? ? ? • County road? NO ? ? ? ? ? • State? NO ? ? ? ? ? • Local road? NO ? ? ? ? ? 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ?Yes XX$No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year C during which the project will be visible? ?Yes XXXNo 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTI G VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *'/a mile * 1 mile Essentially undeveloped ? ? Forested ? ? Agricultural xx ? Suburban residential xx ? Industrial ? ? Commercial ? ? Urban ? ? River, Lake, Pond ? ? Cliffs, Overlooks ? ? Designated Open Space ? I ? Flat ? ? Hilly ? ? Mountainous ? ? Other ? ? NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: NONE *1/2 mile ?Yes ?No *1 miles ?Yes ?No *2 miles ?Yes ?No { *3 miles ?Yes ?No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NONE NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY NONE Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ? ? ? ? Involved in recreational activities ? ? ? ? Routine travel by residents ? ? ? ? At a residence ? ? ? ? At worksite ? ? ? ? Other NONE ? ? ? ? 2 t SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER .SENDER: SUBJECT: Lo11 T L;ne SCTM# : 87 - S - 21 . I a 21 , Z COMMENTS: wp - 3 .1993 Y~ / I J i°. •i ~ ~ max. ~ a I2\\ i ~P- k ~ a 1 03 i I \ I / o 06-' I` I NN ZZ 22 rrbe / H~ i• ) a 2r \I ~I O X64 ~ / = NV - f III , 1 I _ s ~1? Z I ¢~yy O fir/ V r 4 i iy y' u_ i t S y;, t', l ` a s r 1 9 iv I 3$ i~ y es .v L Rj24 i ; „ ~ °q icryc °s e 4 r _ it3ir e i// I •ys~ 1oflli e ~ t ~.t j~ J ~ ~ It~ti ~•y ~ l i l l l ~ of .Q~` •z'ei s~ €~k r \I ~!!~i I _ Yb• d 6 a ear t ii JAMES BITSES Lighthouse Road Attorney at Law Box 1407 Southold, N.Y. 11971 765-5700 (516) May 31st, 1995 PLANNING BOARD TOWN BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 RE: OFFER OF RIGHT OF WAY TO TIDEWATER FOR PUBLIC LAUNCHING RAMP MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD PARCEL 87-05-21,3&,4 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, I OFFER THE FOLLOWING: 1- A fifty foot right of way from Main Bayview Road to tidewater on Corey Creek approximately 900' in length, comprising about one and one half acres, . IN EXCHANGE I EXPECT THE FOLLOWING: 2- An appropriate zone for a shipyard on five acres, 3- An appropriate zone for an adjoining motel on ten acres. This is an offer to offer, giving rise to no claims or rights to either party during informal discussion. The suggested facility makes sense in Southold where the public has, in effect, been excluded from use of the local tidewaters simply by the sale of the entire waterfront for residential purposes, The Cove development adjoins the proposed development to the west, so there is precedent for the above proposal, which, incidentally will open up Peconic Bay for recreational marine use, g 0W O Yours truly, 1 J JN 2 1995 SOUTHOLD TOWN James Bitses PLANNING BOARD Map enclosed Ad A5 6t'' 6 ?G.'.. t4. ISO r Vla 'Z` hC t 1 va Z50.~.,e.; glx~o s.~. it ~4l At. r. n 0 7/339 s. F. ,1191 n 01 0 ~ _ p1I l K' . U l •i ~I I E p III ~ ~ l ~,t •U 0~ .t5' Q/~ N ~ t ~ I ~ / O?, V tta.tr+~ t:a F~ I tza.aY)t I I h I ~t 9N w 4ckp-, 1~-) W, Y ~ bn ' >-r~lirtfr n__ aro r+r a lt"Vv d'J,utoo 197? 5hufftn_ log V nfnrt/ Bnarr4E rftS o o-rl4r-oar Jinrni 7bnVFj fJrrl rhnftr •,t m•enr I_r.•I r .fr• , r.,~ I , • r v > ( •I1. 040 t Q(. t~t~ I cr y ~,pEEI~ Y y V-N qQ Q 1 16- s- TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET VILLAGE.- DIST. SUB. LOT FORMER OWNER N E ACR. tit) =-3 r, n~ Q~ S25 S 7- W 1 p TYPE OF BUILDING Q F P 06,! rPS tJ.Eliris RES. SEAS. VL.FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS o d SAC./ nr,~ L- rid dr s ~:''~Se-s r uv ?-/-83 V o - ift f - r 36 3 I 5 -3 Siizgs:.~1L- jOO App oor~ - O - 64sfs 4v - ses- n -~1(P$DOd3Q' 614se-S N/C 2g~p-C~S 436 L 8 If49 7F13~- 1'3i +se~ Tillable FRONTAGE ON WATER VKoodlaud - FRONTAGE ON ROAD Meadowland DEPTH House Plot BULKHEAD Total -ZGQ f, _ _ s- ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OPERTY ` RECORD CARD OWNER STREET VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT l~ FORMER OWNER N.- S1 i F ACREAGE 7r 79 n S 1 g 3<,v W. TYPE OF BUILDING / a-dl- 11505 h~YY ~15G1p+-F _ RES. I SEAS. VL, 3111 RM COMM. IND. CB. I MISC. Est. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS /Q 'le Z. Ppmdrpr4 An -Bi+2ei-;pl4,QQo X c D Z Y G 1 9 ,~1,~7` Ac FM; p L T: 7kj- e- Z-r ex v .1 o ? r/ f T uJ s .,v. T%6? o X' 2 a o App- joao Re? .~oeo s 9 ' ~s Sir lZ l e E D G CON I o 0//94-L/) AZD -014 T soc • 40 %3,45e:5, E6 a C/S NEW NORMAL BELOW, ABOVE FRONTAGE ON WATER Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value FRONTAGE ON ROAD Tillable I BULKHEAD Tillable 2 DOCK Tillable 3 IOt1tY O d1.... Brushland House Plot Total t JAMES BITSES Lighthouse Road Attorney at Law Box 1407 Southold, N.Y. 11971 765-5700 (516) May 31st, 1995 PLANNING BOARD TOWN BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 RE: OFFER OF RIGHT OF WAY TO TIDEWATER FOR PUBLIC LAUNCHING RAMP MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD PARCEL# 87-05-21,3&.4 LADIES AND GENTIZVU N, I OFFER THE FOLLOWING: 1- A fifty foot right of way from Main Bayview Road to tidewater on Corey Creek approximately 900' in length, comprising about one and one half acres. IN EXCHANGE I EXPECT THE FOLLOWING: 2- An appropriate zone for a shipyard on five acres. 3- An appropriate zone for an adjoining motel on ten acres. This is an offer to offer, giving rise to no claims or rights to either party during informal discussion. The suggested facility makes sense in Southold where the public has, in effect, been excluded from use of the local tidewaters simpler by the sale of the entire waterfront for residential purposes. The Cove development adjoins the proposed development to the west, so there is precedent for the above proposal, which, incidentally will open up Peconic Bay for recreational marine use. ~i Yours truly, nr SOUTNOLDTOWN r James Bitses PLANNING BOARD Map enclosed 9q s64.07'H. lylr)ifq ,b ~'FaY lirV'I S A.6 -40`. - d.~C,.7<' 5,C) 0 s r~ a,420 rso' I V 1) `~.7 lit 44 7i I (,I L 4 4 4/339 41 Z504/250 41 z5Cie.r. d ~ $ 011 0 ~ I 1 I~N m~ 7 y 1 lE ( ; 1j V l 1 I I i •0 p,~ a• v;11 N ~ ~ ~ j , 1 r.4 I ~ ' r v Q ~ 0 ..vim"r 3 a~ Crime+rrrT rl.. yo4 ti a ~rovrd June l:? i979 e~ . N,:!or~ufhn i ,j. t,'larnlil f30arrd) L~'r-nl. /'.7 ;ur^C, ~'['lr br"O ,P, l~/l r'Wq'R :..IIOM/r( ybovF~ ` l: 11 : ~.~llrY QI'P ry.~ IJ!'/• !'lf/)I '.1 ty rl_EYIF. !V1 mil ?i:1~j ~ I 0 coo 1 C' Q a..~ p. Y rt r ro: ai YAIe T 1 1 ' 4q r.RR IL' }I ?n r Lf°' op `wx t w . I ^ ^ e~TYEe ? v , L' w e u 11_ '4 t' N i1. - av. W f rw M f , I -n ~ t t i = , y ~ awa i'a ~ . Ir xr % bl ,r ~ai ?..'c J t • pr y44 '1 aya L._ . ;vl_ •4i •1 r • y i fAl a a• ~ IL • • . • ` •44LdL •F¢ La O vd. n I1vrn a yew a"L1 d ~ aoap u.. / n... to p • vvJ p ~ + ya w . lu m)x Y«. V+~. ' R u•al w ~ y } A A' a a' 1 Laq' i Rw_ Ii O A I) ) ~^ive_ ¢ ~ ly a « DSO\fo t .n a a? • 'Y ? L / ~ ~ rQ 1C s° « u•t,l ••a • ~ a a • L1 / ' / f/ } .wa nun c a n O 1)e . SUITNd.U VWI «.4 - r(f y M Y • i ' 1.~ r 1 eISTRIGT T ? s.~ i b `I ~ , a I T L0. .n.K-:~ vi f yr' ye ~ w a ? e...} er.•• t 41 M" 10 i • L+- 7 .Y ~ `E ie S 3 /KG NEOY BAY f I~ !1 Lm,fiftd «`«P © COUNTY OF SUFFOLK +°~•n soureoLg W-M Y"F w.rr. L.Lw frr4. rM...nlr xr.ra»nLr __.X.__ ;SS; „ •^c- -t- '^Lr .._a....Lr Lr _ a:o~. -,a,~~- Real Prope ceYTaa Service Agency "t+YaP - 087 Y Caal•r YAwCf Yt 1000 ww,r. r.»Il..w . - a aLY 6°..Maad, L. I., Y•n Yer1 L.u..r+. PROPERTY YAP _.,..:~n. wry, NrJM7!£G? 4+0t_o Yfoc ! MOOS WAE'?1 3~WS" 4?~ 1 f~ e~3j~i& 1 11N F$ P~2co~seo L iNE C"ANae=s pU6 p g Ig94 I I 'SxA'f'¢~i~6' f1'Pthi,thl': ~M.° ~GtYWtF_W ~ ,(c'~1A~ ON ~ q ~4,b ~~6 ~~Q~•,. • ' b.92 }gyp. h', (Y (((V O _ SUODlVY i io" P~IANNING BOARD Ml34A'c FYJi<'' - AT Of I Ei4YVl~~N" i ch- To'wr ~EozuTxoi-o,N-Y: 41 z so S.40.: (1 3 a f Q ~ ~ ~ Ot ~ S f ~~j •S {r~FbcH ~`~qN &7^ id- _t ' _a$gg`1 m1 y,• h i -I ~.l C\1 .JpN /f' a fi OJ'r r,~ To To l'a! "Ar-aa !5.3 >Qcr6's pQ ggVi(„ A. `1- O. .,:`1 ~ GIB I .d1 { Oi Fiv, nz.+rry~ 1 na.c iz3.aVs~ I '20 6 N' Frig rI 71.5'd, 1. latex 1xr~ ~zo o~ ~_e~ Sor~hhold N.Y. ~~epy6 b` g5 I nr.~o^Q~,~°w, / = 5,s,4f, ° ~ r"~w fij .yA"9~ l_pnlG 'Otr i J4~ME5 f317"',uF~' ~ ` ~ c a~ 1g- 3 J f ~~ti Exi Sf'<rKt linen da•Hed oa aarcwed June l21 1979 i ` bl/ SnjMoid Town Fannin? Bsarrl; =x'tx SufX-at t. Gc• Jax <Yia~V (,l~aicprluJ•iall: l ~J Pr-apaead lines 50licl, kro03ed areas shown absvet, Or:; l Or:;/- ~GY~O, Scr_7. 087, BJoct 3. LOfi(.3, Zl.4~,-ZL.' - \ '"8- EKi sl-;nry or e*S; Ne+change in armi - I i 9(•04) 'Z99 -p~ j1'. 4 tot 5; 11.1 dares - 9~8 I i ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ \ Arrt~nder/_ Mar, lei /47;>'. i A it I, S~ lCaS~'l'_ gCYES Jti r1 Z i o I \ 9, 196-1 %93 1 , 1993 1993 ib7a~Seecl Ju~r 16,1974 C3 ? WETLAA05 ` I oEC. l4. 1993_ _ ~C (393_ _ K.oc,U2(_II VAN7T-Y! ,P'-~ $ x 1 q Y 111 ve b. 8, t 99q r 99.9 AUG- 17,1994 94 _ _ICenseof Larxq Suevavor ~n NeW York. ~ ~ ('-SO M Etlu lon r>n9ol Seglon .'yn on olm~ ~r}~Yr^" " y~ I ceWnlaw. Sol WelVew YCrk SW F. Etlucalbn law. W ~",;[~~z ~„K V.~.1(ry~ ~Plas of Wl7 nava!r 'F Ole lanO S-un@¢p Y!•^`P Ila16 YC[~~yy vmh•~,oil vvai chaL~rolbeanad W 1 ..~1 Cn ~t° I ~ mm•~.od a~u, y e vaua aye lobo ~ I I eva;,a ~•.+e corn ~ ` r ^IY!o flw~,cr pn lW Ldc~ ^:~,r`0u.192a20 j pr L7 I "I ~i 1111 -''-u:ri ft:b 1. a ny O' OU1Na 5. T~ I nuH cap. l- ~ f ~ - r _ ruoC6 ylrL' m u.,, Ivno~~^'"' y Ac:, l, and uc y"uiJorkl6.. J OWI^uf4 u~ur NU;yyLd01 f F..,: roWiYOn ~un+rrt~ C ©rarsra nlrczt .>CwAL, rrr r r;G % c~ s ~xrty ^+Yh °dd°IYn °I \ E3°°tl°n ~2W dlln N°Y V ~~gMYy~yy ~mNqprrclbwl i °ngwNNkWRId ~ - P20105ED L (NE C! IAN(~~ m°~~x"° 0i°° } OLA rye/ °dYbN° ~h°r°°n eheArun ; 6 ? &AyVIC_ VV, A r ~ ~ W°~y~ ~Ne behJ~imuro~ I ! ~ i fUF_ r Y Y. g°Vemmnnhl;- ~ Jf-UEtGlVI.:>„~N hnwaYUwuwrc„r,;ean~,","`sr`~ h1A4' W°n'a"b~"c` AT vs j). l 1. ~ ~ E ~vb ,Npq° !2 - o r 0 ~1 . 39 a. a. ~ l It ZSO 41 0 e.of. "l ~ ~P% Z6®s w. R 0 TUwI.! C7F= y~~~[.1Tilp(_U,P1.';' 604'.;:" Sco/e: /00 ,=f"• To t,~ r=r,-ea 15.3 nvuW rY~ J..IS~ :Jn,.rea .t ~;vve rope 1,x,1: =k.~c r,~v9* f V Y//~~7LS6 /a5.0 i .,u i-hold fJ,Y ? ' 5,g~~a2E~~,, 9.6 / rv.6o^r~'-lcrw~ j ~ S19'6.56 ° rl~.. ' 0.0 i ~'eeo uN° r`r ~ f II I gti „ ~ I~ ~ ExrS+<irE! lines doi/ed es abrimvrd June l°,1974 \ \ ~ Vl ti r } I b11 Sou }ha ley Town Alannirrq Baarv'1 ` Prn're eo lines solid, o sed arena ' F 1»' pa shown above, •,a_ [r 7"nn (t%'~ CJ5~Li0'~mMrorr: _8- Exi _i-~.1o arey5: NE-I- <hnn~e +n arews" CKXD, • \ Ln+ 1: 91, 041 s7. ft. I ~ Lcsf d:: ~ +210 l I} - cot 5c !/.laerae -9z8 1 2:9, ( Jp r7. Z 5, 1949 y~ ~ ~ . Feb. ~ = S9_ 's ~~o ACr~IJ 1~ Nn v. l6,; jgt o g' CS ?9 wern.vss ~,r vee. /.F, /99.i _ 2,t999 VAN le-j _ V.._ I nP ' .~SO,r :i ga1999 2, N _ C-eYrs@N Lm" a rvafC;-s u rer_.~ ~~:--r New YaVk. o I o I V~ ` I o I P ~''y !9~ 1 ~ / 1 M ~ I I r n f 1 2.~ r MAR 2 2 19ga IUI V OU NIN~B~pApp 'NN _ r F y~ t,.yti.9 PeG r~c~r~"~S~ L,IrI,E CHranrG~S ~'.*"y'1~„ ON fv7ir,~U~ ~(J~IVl:j1QfV - , M,4tt5 rue J(~4TN4;,Rl E alT Ar 1 G a4yv/ew ,4 tz* TOwWd of Jor,~~-K~c~, ltil.Y: M oil r 1 Q! ' x ~ ~ a\ 1 1_ ~Y4a _ ~ y~~~_. Cpl .r ~ 1~ ~ Fc~ch prohr'roT~a` ' 1 s vk 1 I ` f I ~ ~ 60L'x 1.. or '=r" s~ar~: rota'=f 7o }:rr_",~reu=--C5.3 a-.-l3ci~ec ' C7wned 4 (3avsloaoci by: - ; Jaw* 84:50z I ~ I ~ nt ~ tz3 ' izSR~yy~ izs.e ~ a 5»,f oki , N.Y. 1 0 OF NfW GK Ygry ` I ~ SS- "R ~ I a "Al "Al N>LSa I l 6 I is/ J-5 wfO YANO r. J E'xibtirrq find!d(d Y*+{ as'a'ieov,N done t2,1979 bj BCUthAfp` ?dwr( PlarrHfAtg AparP(g S 5u F'k. "T"art W'O# GbSigrxrFiorr: O G'~rp~io~adaf 'dines satrd; krA~asgf°4rNirs skown abpver ' Ox`.it X000, Se+r_"F 097, L3lacTw 3, (-0"7 21.G t21.1 I xi,A~-iti arcd4t Net chore in arpos. TwOfoe 4L 12 1 4A+ ! 4! tSWJ +'29$ \ \ Lo F' is -2110 ma k eeel4r ~ mGlena.4rv°Y°tnsleem^ewa~ embossed s°GloxppY, nsh>flmn gM~f~n tf6d Mqr. J«1479 J«'~ 14_79. wh°°"°Iro tsahert° Ney i '~ti Guam^&ed. aroma °n IL b T .,e SPa _~w l'.JC 4PIYwm°P Jan. ~,~r 197 Ne wmPU`e.••;,.;:'"%°namcn lG i ~ IandlnOlc='.iw y, . , 5'cNGIOmpN ln~uf rome eGelL^'- - uePY td~ i C~9; 1u11°n. GU`~"1r.~iLua4lumGY]3e9 ro Paal s. /993~ /_R/9e~g (r.^1n~sarI Ja~x.l6,1979 owner.- *J air l Otte'. 14'._I99d 4,,-1F93__ ~oc7f:"~!rc:rCVAnrT_Ur'L,ppF?:.- t V r a ' Lrcprtssd Larxar SLix^ves~^;. :yY xi~+Ur'F Now Y,3eL' i o. I a J T~ .DEC 1 6119831°~ y sounmCo o -r a mfr PWNNIN OaAfjD _ y:_ AI 41, 1 .a.. y k4`t~l+`+^sfl f q, - n~%~' G,("u°'.o r,1 $ r + dr: ~~-lurJr"'kc ~4`r+~h'iYf i l+/rCJ,t ftMitiEr'?,'J~c"S, fc ;G1455 f~NCX., aPJT IV~ ! PeoP05ED LINE CNANGEE NRNGES sd+l~ 9 K 9t f tibo r YV/15 / 0040 l Y oa - dL3• . y $ r i„ (5,.7$ ¢ I N(; QJUBDIV15iON WON 9 > a ATNEIZJJVE 317"-5 NIS v . B wcx~ 47' _..JEi~7' b 1il'' 1 ry.? ' 1- o Kr ~arrEw' T©wm of SA'~rrroto.l~l'.'r: _y eft 3;39 xa 91 K ; . 4I Zoo a w. Zvi z,sor rc A ° Scale : (oo l,\ Total Area. 4.134 Acres Icres Owned 8 Devslnax[ b.1: J - yDly~ - 'R i2,eM izac~ "rz§.cd~ r¢3 a ri a Jamaam 846es ~I ` 4 t7, .r P4 l.z S::EI:' `TZ5_'O o,~o .SorAold. N.Y. brphJCS C,~= w .JANr~SBr7T.~ES ) L i axis+ing llnes doirad as ahbmved June 12,1979 by bou fho/d Tawn R/ar,riing Boers(, , Suffolk Cn. Tax M,/v~16 CMsignor cn: rgrrc#ion r, Propasad tines solid,f ropo'sed Arear shown abovef 0r6+. 4000, :5ea+. VH7, eiock 3, Lois iock 3, Lo'f 2L2 ~tA421.1 . ~ Exi9+,nq aYeabi .nle+change in ae, a sc rz.o.vl:ls,928saf* -928 f. Lo+ f : 4f, 041 . a-298' 9 f' f j rf'o+ 2: 41,440 +2(D ',Lo+ S: +210 ~ rStriend6r/ A~I~rr, 13 l979. MAR - 3 1993 'q -7 ~ ''k t~~" !nc ~ fg _ vinrir,~rasoy~m 1 9 .f G.wkb,1 's KAY 1Y1~ ~ -~C,~•-" ~!Q { z. 31 r 4~ 4 061 I-qr G Ae*