HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-86.-7-4 ' �' •p � - Latre of 6uiltQrr yf :eitJ+ror�s � �� �e1 _"_- � �._._.
S,'Z 'ati'3G"a. //4R 23
It as
l w 'TSJ 378 S9.lt b N. I� $'�O 6jrf-f�
J. Ipal *4970 arl'a Nay
I �• e p .
cgqJn� n ti o��6wrl N
d+•ivelnw if SBS.42 ..s/ Jlria v C ti
%97 N.Yf'49"op"' 509.96 N.2'2'r 9'Zo..w. r r3Aa7 q "r lIt
r�aP
Larr,�/ nJG' L'�4firu/ u Rai[tjrs�.foM Kd.
p-eepwery Foe
�' M�+paFMtNQczsuBp�v�sr�N - I
k'H 0 /-7 L E(„ N VAJC ANO
dao sorra;arvios!to
AT �$4T7rLktK :YAavKo -�?vrvuzrr u�azrv�rr, t 1
=� !r✓artirr ivsea, apAa . -�s_�irrAr�e v>�.zvcutt t I
PL4G@Krc' 14. Y. 'f/996
row N O�, SOurNOLD
'xlrar mme .
. - SRNPS' . . . !FM>•3fifQfl'� soaps',
o. sr+ loo. roo - soo casxs
fcro aie�-usr
sa.JP e'nrar.+. Jf
rNrwaq
- 6'120' A bwMPa7rr�'� ,
APPROVED BY rT' rro/cac rx ra
l*#T Co.rAX'PA a;
esPos�
eu+rtra: rpaac b '
PLANNING BOARD <.�
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Z.F�tgAla7'Y Is}N sn/ct?rNs zoua 2_�p; ' '
Ar MAY 18 1595 xrF+a-t/�aa'e.suvPrx ava sewAoa o:a±�+aswc
F*7aa/E�jgpb ?'qiF rGItL 4aT5 OK'ri./j AMP COMPLY .� ,+'<a-oz �_, 4
wltN rNe arwwaasoa ,aua asoui2a�eecKrS a�+ � �=.y . �
_ - rXM'6f1PP8LK GR AwP4 rrrr%wAr"r 40 KIrw4TN. a+rcq'•7s . . ,.aernw'. - '- '
'OPQ.S.S byRL, ERNb - Au.rR , -„
4z taeKin(s u4f7`as �ti staat
,Ep,exn wed i., :sr wdaa�r.wild+ saenl d Re�irw 'i'rQ w*4/2C. $**IV141
��4.tse.a3aaalcn dwsw9 �..�-.--�---•---`-�' r - X
N/
DEP fQ wx;YC04 Wge-4
SUFFOLK GOlAd7y �a+�xn�
Ipe tom, r err •�v�.
� A Ia tg9sCRt +sin laid
eZtV9K�9Al7 S
br Mt+lar cwt,the MAY 18 1995
r�9s+*mow eP y
.sNa'_¢�.s�•.¢J�rr��nwyr� yvtrx/�, °n� owifte dtspaest ,or '!'1-,I r t3, .Vr�rp
.��/=;=�Sr Lcrr3 PA•_rN!3_-M$A/�t�il M iA"� 1�7}l�l:D -' lrlih a a'aa3'af ''^�p�
" duh Ylis-whaw date. 'rnearr - _ Ftr mm ec enaeo 8Qa sati Sa'a", 6-rq
N iF/L V eN Ctr�POLK f.Gs/NY;Y E l".,Ylbn IaMadb�N slleCl B the Fu61Efe tpk�Rp 3a,. - - _.—s.....�,.._...1 rr�; ,vK
YB'amll be nay&=Cq*'In Mg OvKg "w j"ta+r, -� - - _ ytE' rasespy'r ,err -
S',l4F6, -le ck*t4ted-wh the Co0n4 CIerK�vkt 1 OI; �S'CA Fi//J hOA�P"CA'L$fS U'�IA 7 '-vo 4a .61:' ,
--, - faL dtslp� C'or?�tpeq Id h&-ft olven for'tha
4tPean in lhs,0% g ., C.an,? i _ �n "�' rK'wdzB.a ayra� 'rYra•,r' r' I� ,.,wic-Nr r.3 .
d the ?nh�,HUM Lav Wd gCasa - �vwrn�i.rxo.ww¢auiw - areae 6Y� us F.24i+�/. pc>'vAt buKva'YS_
g i *�r �w 6i 49faub 'rlfA'r e�
JCSI�.PH r9. a,,Ew t'E w .+r M .,�;:,� _ CaNGrRe7'F a10NuroE'Krs ANWrr Q 4tAf - -
vaa*c %dm & &mmmm,,ty Q"4b "° as r ,or/+aievrs aaoww rKu r to
41uwMii�w'Me+e�w.n+n.1a+^. 4'
,wwr b � �2 'z*&' X 7't./
Nryai Y L
+., ; i � �IluiiNAM+�b?N2wG ' .
/ I
¢ R.T.._.. r. gewri:12-v
t12
_ I
x..
4.ww Yjry�
Ia
o��gpff0[�-cDo
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS =�
Richard G. Ward, Chairman y = Town Hall,53095 Main Road
George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 0 ^� P. O. Box 1179
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. �� Southold, New York 11971
Mark S. McDonald ��,( .�`�� Fax (516)765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1936
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
May 19, 1995
Richard F. Lark, Esq.
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Proposed minor subdivision for Kathleen Varano
SCTM# 1000-86-7-4
Dear Mr. Lark:
The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on
Thursday, May 18, 1995:
The final public hearing, which was held at 7:00 p.m. was dosed.
The following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Kathleen Varano is the owner of the property known and
designated as SCTM# 1000-86-7-4, located on the south side of Indian Neck
Road in Peconic; and
WHEREAS, this proposed minor subdivision, to be known as minor subdivision
for Kathleen Varano, is for 3 lots on 5.425 acres; and
WHEREAS, a variance was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals (Appl.
#4281) on November 2, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State
Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead
agency and issued a Negative Declaration on November 14, 1994; and
Page 2
Proposed minor subdivision for Kathleen Varano
May 19, 1995
WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at
the Town Hall, Southold, New York on May 18, 1995; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of
Southold have been met; be it therefore
RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the
Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated December 16, 1994.
Enclosed please find a copy of the map which was endorsed by the Chairman.
The mylar maps, which were also endorsed by the Chairman, must be picked
up at this office and filed in the office of the County Clerk. Any plat not so filed
or recorded within sixty (60) days of the date of final approval, shall become
null and void.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
enc.
cc: Building Dept.
Tax Assessors
i
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS
DECLARATION made this 3rd day of May , 1995, by KATHLEEN
VARANO, individually and as Trustee under Last Will and Testament
of Dominick Varano, residing at 1024 79th Street, Brooklyn,
New York 11228; MARIO VARANO, as Trustee under Last Will and
Testament of Dominick Varano, residing at 7621 18th Avenue,
Brooklyn, New York 11214; and PASQUALE VARANO, as Trustee under
Last Will and Testament of Dominick Varano, residing at 1426
74th Street, Brooklyn, New York 11228, hereinafter called the
Declarants .
WHEREAS, the Declarants have title to certain land situate,
lying and being at Peconic, in the Town of Southold, County of
Suffolk and State of New York, said land being more particularly
described in Schedule A attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold did on
December 12, 1994 grant sketch approval on the parcel of land
described in Schedule A into a minor subdivision of three lots to
be known as "Minor Subdivision for Kathleen Varano at Peconic,
Town of Southold, New York" , a copy of which map is attached
hereto as Schedule B.
WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold resolved
on December 12, 1994 and February 6, 1995, there should be place
on the subdivision the following covenants and restrictions :
1 . The cost for the maintenance of the common driveway shown
on the minor subdivision map shall be paid equally between the
owners of Lot Nos . 1 , 2 and 3 on said map.
Page 2 of 11
2 . Clearing and cutting in the areas outside the building
envelopes, as shown on Schedule B, shall be limited to that
necessary for proper maintenance and removal of diseased, decayed
or dead material and obnoxious plant species . Clearing and
grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for
siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as
much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible.
3 . These Covenants and Restrictions can be modified only at
the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of
a majority plus one of the Planing Board of the Town of Southold
after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be
entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to
such modification shall not be required.
Declarants do hereby further warrant, covenant and represent
that the foregoing restrictions and agreement shall bind the
undersigned, their heirs, successors and assigns, and any and all
person or persons who shall succeed to the ownership of said
premises or any part thereof by transfer or otherwise.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarants have duly executed this
Declaration the day and year first above written.
KatMeen Varano, individually and—
;
nd
as T ! of Do inick Varano
'��C �
Mari Varano, as T/U/W of
Dominick Varano
Pas ua a arano, as T/U/W of
Dominick Varano
Page 3 of 11
STATE OF NEW YORK:
es .
COUNTY OF SUFFoL K
On this 3J day of M"rY 1995, before me personally came
KATHLEEN VARANO to me known to be the individual described in and
who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she
executed the same.
lJ� <,OLG446�
Notary Public
Ndmy r6%%SIC10 of fboy lk
On.4635190,Sli".o5t 4r.::67
Cnren; ',r L:pL:s GticSlet 91,1991
STATE OF NEW YORK:
,/ . as .
COUNTY OF Fyy
On this q- day of y 1995, before me personally came
MARIO VARANO to me known to be the individual described in and
who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he
executed the same.
NotaryVPublic
TERESA MASTERSON
NOTARY PUBLIC.Ste".1 lem Yerk
NO.24—4747121
Qpsllfled In King,Ce li .s
Comin9sslen Expins April DO.1997
STATE OF NEW YORK:
11��
s e .
COUNTY OF 14.1 r :
On this d 6`tday of e"6 1995, before me personally came
PASQUALE VARANO to me known to be the individual described in and
who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he
executed the same.
,
Vu erg, d (-94u
Notary Public
r r
wirrm n. Prnnnno
ph.inl" Pili.".. r,..,.. ..l r�..,.r Yrrk
is , 1 1"r17 Go�
19
Pagr+ 4 of 11 jc
SCHEDULE A
All Ilial certain plol, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and larproeemerda thereon erected, situate,
lylrr` andbe(ndR11t11K at Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk
and State of New York, being more particularly bounded and
described as follows:
id BEGINNING at a point on the southeasterly side of Indian
Neck Road where the same is intersected by the division line
between the northeasterly corner of the hereinafter described
parcel and the northwesterly corner of land now or formerly
of Guinan and Richards; running thence along said division
Tine, South 220 29 ' 30" East 1149. 23 feet to the ordinary
high water .Line of Peconic Bay; thence along the ordinary
high water line of Peconic Bay, South 610 22 ' 10" West 197 . 79
feet to the easterly side of land now or formerly of Dubru.l;
thence along said land, the following four (4) courses and
distances: (1) North 220 19 ' 20" West 733 . 77 feet] (2) North
240 49 ' 00" West 309. 96 feet; (3) North 300 28 ' 30" West 71 . 27
feet; (4 ) Nor. L•h 390 26 ' 00" West 97. 94 feet (:o Lire southeasterly
side of Indian Neck Roars; and thence along the southeasterly
side cif Indian Neck Roars, the following two (2) courses and
distances: (1) North 740 44 ' 40" Fast 226 . 57 feet; and (2)
South 890 31 ' 00" East 22 . 53 feet to the point or place of
BEGINNT.NG.
1
Page 5 of 11
THIS MINOR SUBDIVISION IS FOR 3 LOTS ON 5.415 ACRES LOCATED ON
1$Ftoutlneihu�Znc92ar Ytck (load. IN `tuoniG
SCTII# 1000- 96- 7 - 4
MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD)
Complete applica on received
Application reviewed at work session ,xro. oK
aoL OK
ixro.
Applicant advised of necessary revisions '7 Z
Revised submission received 7 ti?i ro•` aK
�O 107K
ixro.
Sketch plan approval
-with conditions 12 i2J�2��
b��a%4•Sen,+ LA t wn&.
Lead Agency Coordination see �� Lulaj9y 111141 LJ
SEQRA determinationNeA Ilo„ 111419y
Sent to Fire Commissioner 1 13 9
Receipt of firewell location 1b79s A6 wen- dacs."n J4�&t I ye,,?,
Notification to applicant to include on final map Ilk
Sent to County Planning Commission i � M PM
oK
Receipt of County Report 1131 q5 ixxs. oK
Review of SCPC reportrAM
�ZI6I95 ouarrebl2 rem
Draft Covenants and Restrictions received ZhZ125 xro. OK
Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed ✓ ro• oK
Filed Covenants and Restrictions received
Receipt of mylars and paper prints with
Health approval .
Final Public Hearing
Approval of subdivision
-with conditions
Endorsement of subdivision S S
-2bA CiSio'M lll6l$6 r 5� Tre: 11mi+1S oY1 LJt i 61 J /�.0 tiCJ CPJ
eld ✓5e
• D [ (� �
Id Ir,-2 (2l87)-7c 0WIl
617.21 91 f1
Appendix A SEP 81994 S
Stale Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORA IsourlioLorowN ,;, .
PLANNING 13DARD
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in ao orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether ,n action may be significant is not ,[ways easy to answer. Frequent-
ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unnleasureable. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
i
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type '1 and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for (his project: IN fart I LRI ['art 2 ❑fart 3
CUpon review of the information recorded on this FAT (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the nl,gitude and importance Of Pact' impact, it is reasonably determined fly the
lead agency that:
LA A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because file mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaraliou will be prepared.*
❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Cluster Subdivision for Kathleen Varano
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer
( Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from responsible officer)
September 2 1994
Dale
1
PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be cbnsidere�
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAT will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
Cluster Subdivision for Kathleen Varano
LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address,Municipality and County)
Indian Neck R ad, Peconic, New York
NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR XUAC MTELEPHONE
Kathleen Varano (7181833-2110
ADDRESS
1024 79th Street
CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE
Brookl n NY 11228
NAME OF OWNER(If different) Kathleen Varano, Kenneth J. Varano, BUSINESS TELEPHONE
Mark Varano and Sal R. Varano
ADDRESS
CITY/PO
STATE ZIP CODE
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Subdivision of 5. 425 acres of land on the southerly side of Indian
Neck Road, Peconic, New York (Suffolk County Tax Map No. District .
1000, Section 086. 00, Block 07 . 00, Lot 004 . 000)
Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential(suburban) ®Rural(non-farm)
❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other
2. Total acreage of project area: 5- 425 acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Orushland (Non-agricultural) 0 acres 0 acres
Forested 0 _ acres O
acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 acres __ 0_ acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) __ n acres 0 acres
Water Surface Area 0 acres Oacres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres 0 acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 acres 0 acres
Other (Indicate type) Existin4 residence and 5. 425 acres 5. 425
vacant acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? ._ -. tomSoil and coarse sand and gravel
a. Soil drainage: INWell drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained as of site
❑Poorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through •I of the NY
Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes ONO
a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet)
2
5. Approximate percentage of propo �roject site with slopes: llt0-111% _• °5 ❑1U-I S".o 40
1115% or greater °o
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? Dyes 1XNo
'. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes INNo
8. What is the depth of the water table? 18 (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes Otto
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist hi the project area? ❑Yes Mo
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
❑Yes CKNo According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, Junes, other geological formations)
Dyes ®No Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
Dyes I$No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
Dyes ®No
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: - N/A
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N/A
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name N/A b. Size (In acres) N/A
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Myes [-]No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ®Yes ❑No
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Dyes IXJNo
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? Dyes ®No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes $JNo
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes ®No
B. Project Description
• 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 5 - 425 acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: 5. 425 acres initially; 5. 425 acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres.
d. Length of Project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %;
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A ; proposed N/A
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 3 (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially 1 0 0 0
C Ultimately 3 0 0 0
1. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 26 height; 30 width; _ 0 length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 249.10 It.
3
1. How much natural material 0.0ock, earth, etc.) will be removed from t9site? 0 tons/cubit yards,
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ❑No I$N/A
a. If yes, for what intender; purpose is the site being reclaimed? N/A
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ®No
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes WNo
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
❑Yes S)No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 0 months, (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased: N/A
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition).
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year.
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ONo
8. Will blasting occur during construction? Oyes ®No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 0 ; after project is complete 0
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes MNo If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Oyes ONo
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount N/A
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N/A
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑yes 17fNo Type N/A
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑yes ISNo
Explain N/A
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Oyes INNo
16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes )C]No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month N/A tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ONo
c. If yes, give name N/A ; location N/A
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Oyes LJNo N/A
e. If Yes, explain N/A
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes KlNo
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? N/A tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? N/A years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes MNo
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Oyes &No
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Oyes KJNo
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ®Yes ❑No
If yes , indicate type(s) TA 1r
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 20 gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day 100 gallons/day. E
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Oyes MNo
If Yes, explain N/A
4
" 25. Approvals Required: • • Submittal
Type Date
City, Town, Village Board QYes ®No
(T City, Town, Village Planning Board MYes ONo Minor Subdivision
City, Town-Zoning:Board ❑Yes IMNo
City, County Health Department INYes ONo Artic1d 6
Other Local Agencies Oyes ®No
Other Regional Agencies Oyes IMNo
State Agencies 11 Yes WNo
Federal Agencies OYes GNo
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? MYes ONo
If Yes, indicate decision required:
0zoning amendment (]zoning variance Ospecial use permit Blsubdivision Osite plan
Onewlrevision of master plan Oresource management plan ❑other
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Low Density Residential (R-80)
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
(Threelone—family dwellings
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Low Density Residential (R-80)
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
(Three) one—family dwellings
C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ®Yes ONo
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 114 mile radius of proposed action?
Low Density Residential (R-80)
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/, mile? ®Yes ONo
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? three
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 75 ,300 sq. ft.
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? OYes MNo
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? )"(lyes ❑No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? (Byes ONo
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? OYes MNo
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ONo N/A
D. informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
Impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the informatio rovfded above ' rue to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name Date September 2, 1994
athleen arano
Signature3.it)at
If the action is in the Coastal Area,and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
5
Part 2—OOJECT IMPACTS AND THEIN iOGNITUDE
Responsibility of Lead Agency '
General Information (Read Carefully)
• In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
reasonable( The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. r
• Identifying that_an impact will be potentially large (colunm 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
• The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
• The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
• The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
• In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
Impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This
must be explained in Part 3.
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By
1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Impact Impact Project Change
129NO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ 11 Yes C1 No
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
• Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0N
3 feet.
• Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. CI ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
3 feet of existing ground surface.
• Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
than one phase or stage.
• Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year.
• Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
• Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts ❑ Cl 11 Yes ❑No
2. Will there be an effect P. ,.,ry un,que or unusual land forms found on
the site?(i,e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)LXN0 []YES
• Specific land forms: Cl ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
6
", • 2 3
Small, to Potential Can Impact Be
IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change
(Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
MNO DYES
Examples thacwould apply to column 2
• Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
protected stream.
• Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ []Yes []No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of water? ®NO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
• Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0N
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? INNO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No
C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
• Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
gallons per minute pumping capacity.
• Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
supply system.
• Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
• Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
day.
• Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
• Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
• Proposed Actiop will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No
and/or sewer services.
• Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface
water runoff? ®NO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 1 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
7
• 1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
ModerateLarge Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ C
• Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodwa ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: y' El ❑ ❑Yes El No
❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? IKINO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑
hour. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑
refuse per hour. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Emission rate of total contaminants will e:;ceed 5 lbs. ❑
per hour or ❑ Dyes ❑No
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed El �!^
to industrial use.
❑ ❑Yes ❑No
Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ r
development within existing industrial areas. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
Other impacts: ❑ I
❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? %]NO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. El ❑Yes ❑No
Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑
Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
than for agricultural purposes. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
Other impacts: ❑ ❑
❑Yes ❑No
C
Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or i
non-endangered species? MNO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
'roposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. El El El Yes ❑No
'roposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acrest
'f mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
egetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?
Examples that would apply to column 2 WNO OYES
he proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural
nd (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
8
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
agricultural land.
• The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land.
• The proposed action.would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? LINO OYES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2 '
• Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
• Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
• Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? WNO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ O ❑Yes ❑No
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
• Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nn
project site.
• Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
• Other impacts:' ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ' ❑No
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities?
Examples that would apply to column 2 ®NO OYES
C • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
• A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
9
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 2JanBe
14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Small to Potential
Moderate Large
BNO OYES Impact Impact Change,
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑
• Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑❑ ❑• Other impacts: ❑ ❑
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply? &)NO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ Q
any form of energy in the municipality. ❑Yes No
• Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy Q ❑ '-
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family ❑Yes ❑No c
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. p r
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑
❑Yes ❑No
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result
of the Proposed Action? IXNO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑
facility. Q C1 Yes ❑No
• Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ `
❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Q ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ Q
noise screen. El Yes ❑No
Other impacts: ❑ Q
[]Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
Examples that would apply to column 2 SINO DYES
Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ Q
substances(i.e.oil, pesticides,chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of ❑Yes ❑No
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge or emission.
Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any Q ❑ _w
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, ❑Yes ❑No
infectious, etc.)
Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural Q ❑
gas or other flammable liquids. El Yes ❑No
Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance Q
11
within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ❑Yes ❑NO
waste.
Olhpr impacts: ❑
El Dyes ❑No
10
• t 2 3
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By
18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change
ONO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
• The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services O ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project.
• Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
or areas of historic importance to the community.
• Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
• Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts? KINO ❑YES
If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
LIf You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be
mitigated.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1 . Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
• The probability of the impact occurring
• The duration of the impact
• Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
• Whether the impact can or will be controlled
• The regional consequence of the impact
• Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
• Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
11
i.
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT
To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: (; 2 2 r;
The undersigned applicant hereby applies for iaenaxRi* (final) approval of a subdivision platin
accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town
Planning Board, and represents and states as follows:
1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the
owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said
land under application.)
2. The name of the subdivision is to be ..Minor„Subdivision ,for„Kathleen„B:,:-;
, Var ano....................................... .. .......... .. .. .............................. .
3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A” hereto annexed. (Copy of deed
suggested.)
4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as
follows:
Liber .....10746........... . Page ..... .239. .. ......... On December, 1( ,1988,, .
kibxM . ....................... . .... .. .. .. .. .... ..... Oft ....... .. .. .. .... .... .. .
ki'bm< ..... .. .. .. .. .......... .7Pxg@c . .. ............ .... ... lem . .. .:...... ............ ;
AAbW . .. .. .. .. ........ ...... .$'XW . .. .. .... .... ......... ex ....... .. .... ... . .... .. ;
42tbW ....... .... .............MAPC . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. ... 8ki . .. .... .. . . . . .. . ... ....
$K=�XvX>t�xai2f��LSCiC'1ttdSkESa{7YY�AX�'C . .. . . .... .. . ....... .. .. .... ....... . ....
36xxx:dk*dbcaox .......................... . . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .........................
. . ... .. .. .. .. ...... .... ......................... . . . .. . . . . . . .. .... .... . . ....... ........... ....... .
S. The area of the land is ...5; 4 2 5., , ,,.., acres.
6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the (late hereof have been paidxevzoPiB . ........ .. .
. .. ........ .. .. .. . . .. ........ .................. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . .. . . .. .. .... .. ....... .. . ... . . .
nO
7. Tan rThe land by . ....)..Mo.... .a
9?!. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. . ... .... ........... .. ..... .
xxxEgaplac�xu�dalfrsagsr
(x EkieagSaCxxacisatDffd�dx�dsdker . .. .. .. . . .. . . . fx gtx. . . .. . . .. . ... .. ... loamelgxtaltxaaarattt
ao8$. . . .. .. .. .. .. . MpaUxMMUnt,�$c. .. .. . . . . . . :. . . . . . .. . Azekhcky . .. .. .. ...... .. .. .....
... .. .... . . .. . uild§yg ......... ... . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. .... .. .. . . .. . . .... .
(k}cdrittett?tpf(tctaacm�d�lciaxkifxix. ... ... . . 'x c. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . ..... ...AXXWkkMk=M3C%t
wk . .. .... . . . ....xmtmidxatxa w&)$c. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . Amid ckyc . ...... .... .. .. ....:. .
... ...... .. .. . )"dress . .. .. .. .. ........ . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. ............ ......
i
Y
� . . . .. ...........X1mCm�csot
YlIK ..............xt1x4{$..... . . .::............x1te1tQ{*3t
......................
...................... . .. .. ........ .. .... ...I........ ... ........................
8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land x;cMk
....... . .... .. .. .. .. .. ...............................
9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts "R-80"..Residential Low Density
. . ... ..........................
.......... ...................................
10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise,mm
................... ................. . . ...... .... .... ................. ..............
11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements.
12. The land (NbtzS[) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis.
trict, if within a District, is . .. NA .
13./Water mains will be laid by „applicant
.. .. .......... .. ...... .. ....... ..... . . .. ......... .
��xppaWc�xx�ttotjxkargacmadk kac xmrkecfox }1r�saotdcxaias.
14./Electric lines and standards will be installed by .$P??licant; exi�tillg � �� }
. ......... . .. axcdx�ax�(x�xjtgltu> Luafltdx�tRatbe�fondoasttl �tsaict
II�aJJtoo®� ..
15.7,G—as mains will be installed by applicant
xX�9xxjxKlrst ... .. .... .. .. ............................. .... . .. .
�etfoHl�rac,Kikla�acXufiX�tffiSgx�;�}dtxtnk�.
16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existin;• public streets in the
Suffolk County IIighway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same.
17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the
Town of Southold llighn•av system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. Indian Neck
Road�a� Shown on ,yvey of Roderick Van Ztt 1 P.C.
I8. e�g ale r Ex liu, t ddings or structures on the land Which re not locatedated Dec. d and and
Oil the plat.
19. Where the plat shoe's proposed streets which are extensiuus of streets ou adjoining sub_
division maps heretofore filed, there are uo reserve strips at the cod of the streets on said
rxistill.- maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets.
20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant wil
335 of the Deal Property Law. l oiler proof of (isle as required br Sec.
21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex
Schedule "D",
22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be
$.•• as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the
Performance Bond be fixed at ...'Q-..... .. years. The Performance Bond will be written by
a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F".
DATE 193.Q Kathlee B. Varano
.........,•(Name of A licant) .
?{teeth J.' Varano
(Signature*ffVM"
_2 1029 79th Street
Brooklyn, New York 11228
Mark Varano. R. ............. ,
(Address)
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . ..... . ................. .. .. as:
On the .................. day of. ............... .......... .... 19....... before me personally came
••••••••••••••••••-....................... . . to ane xnown to be the individualtdescribed in and who
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ._.......... executed the same.
. . ... . .. . . . ......... .......................... .
Notary Public
STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF ........ ... .. ............... ss:
On the . ............... day ............ of . ... . .........1 19......, before me personally came
.. . . . . ...... . . . .. ........ to use knon•n, who being by me duly sworn did de-
pose and say that ............ resides at No. ....... ...... .. .....................................
. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .......... ......... that ... .. . ......... ........... is the ..........
......... ......... of .................. .. ......... ........ .. ...................................
the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; tint ......... ... knows
the sent of said corporation; that the sent affixed by order or the board of directors of said corporation.
:,n.l that . .... .. .... . signed .............. name thereto by like order.
. . .. . . . . . .. .. .............................. .
Notary Public
fno�Bc�auorp
NoYry ni� 2.a a N.w rak
STATE OF NEW YORK: 01--B�24.4B026S1
COUNTY OF KINGS ss• C9nniMion="07ft99 r
On this fq day of , 1990, before me personally came
KATHLEEN B. VARAN0, known to be the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that she
executed the same.
Notary Public
STATE OF NEW YORK: FRANK AL,BUON0
ss. .01BU244ga02BS1Nowk
COUNTY OF KINGS Oommwion hKMpeCou
On thisday of c , 1990, before me Jersonally came
SALR VARANO, ]mown to be' he individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same.
otary Public
STATE OF NEW YORK: Nou"PUMk. &�Yak
ss. No.01-BU24.4902531
COUNTY OF KINGS Gui1ffied M VJngs Courny
On this / day of 1990, before me personally came
MARK VARANO, 1known to b the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same.
10 owe
Notary Public
FRANK A BUof N
STATE OF NEW YORK: NopryPuhiie,8tstaaNswlrak
. ss. No.01-BU244B02611
COUNTY OF KINGS Ou81ftd in K1rps Caur�y
Conuniwion 07l20/10q
On this day of , 1990, before me personally came
KENNETH J. VA1 O, knowne 'the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing Intrument. and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same.
Not y Public
r`.
11� lriidSr'. r b11 .IYMw Its6dts0 algtkyH101K •.:
{Y A. . ...1� btaN of "��Oi1eM1'OIM rt �
f ► RA!<tl/ OAfMt, "didem0 at M it Street, PrM1„, tit. TM 11tH !v
i Seep geAMO, tee/dIM ee 1011 10/0 Nwee, OrMlpa, M TM &tell
s Ot♦ MM PaMOV"OAWO. real1141 Al IASL 114it0 Street. ONAIp, line TM 1/NW, 1
• t�
a n NO 11m; r &Mbit varop# etlat
/tlr�iWdlw.td � •�
dIllim now. realaing at 161 7t Street. treaties rtJ S6A HOOlml
:r interest as Teerl In Consent and GMdtil TAM", MUMIS r 30 If 0
Maw Tart, NUIO VAMYO, ratldlnt at 7671 10th AV"". kodI", MM T&A f
MIIINILt TASAW. realalne at It26 74th Street. OroAl . Jaw toric 64 - j
iJ 1t OARItR /,e0 o Ill Interest as To"Ote In eaYtinA:
y ttF lwwvivineeft do61Rlarval drfimput byvowafthe Plan rinieMUr&IOWO
`.2�.. J... adMMltl►adrw/Merral tl.ae • �� 1
a, } p1/w6e0rttlrwdMM.wwr '
wvmer.rwrytraddowouldpael.theSets,rmmmnadsaWof*tSrq�d i..
bwr.
ALL w antr SlR Mrs r peael al Y4 016 6a�a/IYr ad YIMwtWwllrMrOlt�IL +.
•l, "godlayrbat Peree/e, Tar of OweMAd, ree.ty of Suffolk asset IF.
of M Toek, being two partlesiarty Medd end NeerlkM w follows . .11 '
etmtltltoo at ■ pint On tea awtMeeteey side of Indian 11,l► r,
MnN tea awe to lnterseet,d by the declaim lies ketweeo tea oartMMtOt
' carver Of the Meelooftoo deseHMd parcel and the noetWeerarlt OweM•y j
of law a" or formerly of pins" and 0lehera/o remains traato slag 4010"• .
dlrldm lir, Inch 77" H' 70" test 1149.71 fool to the oedleep L1N.
• �` •.na9r Igo at recalls say, tMote cloy IM ordinaryNils water levo
foedale guy, teeth 61' 22, 10" Wet 107.11 feet N tea easterly lift
Ism sew or termly of 0e►rola thence along Bala law. tea fellol" f1 :!)
• ' ewoo nw abteecBaJ ll) Wr,1 27' 19' 20" Well 111.11 legal, l2)
the N' 00" vast 7".06 ratio (1) north 70' 26' 10" Woe 11.21 seep
, - Wrth I0' 161 00" Wet 07.04 toot to the southeasterly elee of Ivdlw .
Laves mw trance aims the owtheasterly sift of tedW Wyk Wes 06" ,
following (2) eeenes and atatomeat, (l) North 140 All W Beat 126,51 f odl'.
Saw l2) Soots eft 11' 00" Best 22.11 teat to the plat or plata of SMIWU06�• !�`•
Wlq the ear premises cmreyod to tea Ot"tor herds 6y
dK.. Sucaeeer 16. 19n and recorded ►e►reery 31, HSl to the Suffolk pasty
1
Me" U Liber MI page 786. t
�S . Js
016 rkd4 ab and kelrar.0 eel.of the PCs!6e aad r wap acro wad
60 the�off smwl ear
�'*tn lri'IIWTi MIIIOIo
ft of-ho awned past.Ar leo,r"cereals ad are"a A.pee,• �•:
cast ,.. •
2
11r'_
AMD
ea Ae Mw pan *h,M de Mel, of t1w And Peel kr M dor r"ASrind aw�01.
,r wANp 6�ys/~(i�1atl�dl�e�oe�ye�lrwrj,,a.wwpWw1 .M'nsww+�n dwlMLw ruRbw6e
�`� Awa1apaaa�r�aarrDnIaN w A11ewNw0 . it Ar eaJ al Arenr A"rNn"a'rxx. ►..i.n x.untM tor..AneMInternet
�r
""araa West mftlwgrIsm la ,M pnrOle4 ..".a"In uof hwe*WO�lbrdA
{ 7ei r iw ,1 ;r0 r a.nwea r r N,.ea•p+nw:.1....,.w.«e.f sire ArdM w 1,�
9�[IN.1M per"d Ae Wt w"Les/J►e,esaM M Jttd r�l►w L i�
•,c Ior ��o The Beth d"WPI✓figure
-
��
A 7 ,
w�,
Sao-
got
1ry1tQ SPf���0
1
t tYtwtJ 1 a omm '!
HuN 1CN1gND t► wnt a ww rwa tlwNr• ,•..
Mae 'Vol lord Jatr If Pa,h.1,re rPa Iflwolw dor Rl N ,ftlela at
Plraltafr~ RATNI.►RR \•ARANO. IIAPIO Y.IPANa lerwvuft rtmr
aM MRQOALI VARANO ,:�...
a Pa's wN�40Mtbeoa,tehwot� to of di sts in wA wb mduets u to w mese to be IM MldlvMnl dueOWto
uN
etheINlaaawdlM w ,rad aehaawMdRrd I►e #wvtedA@c UZZOl ban aRaot.rad RtIwMMd/td I
}}k +
SUART
wM M few IMA IaarAr 0 a was a we"N.tattwn�' r i
an dw dor of If .Won ow no& day of If .bolwa we s
pwmwA a or yeraAwl.r cs*w
fMitf 1'T as RwOn,dud.mayow sea fAa OffMwtloss"Arw to Qn tP1R tw 4rMt,
b Iw he adbo"No .hew 1 saw� 1
r M Y as t rwern,dw dniew 6" I= Y w Kw~
I N M Laws 1
IN wr whhh e.w m the tern In" --rww.thin 4 to be 8e IobvYRd
feawa dw teal at aid tapAalba; shot dw aal ollood dntnbed to Ind alt emcm the htrepNd bdwaM t
r al/ befrowM is wrh cagetate aol; tlwt N tea a that be. am ahtte4, r,1veN, .M�a�wt tw: M
SGW M 04v a dw heard d dralm of aid rwprs. "M ho the ural rad Jot L,aM•wtR
IIIA rad that M dpwd b aowte IMre/e by l6o era" At dw unw t"abwrMd h flare(a;;Wm-Awm
raacatoem Aftit
Igen:N
y
tms la. non
to►
the fatale at IfealNldr Mtatte ��.�1OtrN 0f Pe+-nnit
70 111'11.... .n.v r 1.71,01 Indian %,l I.ane
. /a[hleen lawn", 0v In 0 Removal Lrlr•rr .t i. 1.110"1 in 11111111.11, ReaRr*ad -
and ►ntbl..•n ':O.tnn. t,r In VA A.,- F1+n 0,t t,. {'ar-tn,•. A. CHWAre OIIU INSOMANO OR 4"
ItuM1 •, I iL' .d "..�1a 1,. l'.t r,inn. as tl• 1 It! leterrrt at
tI11d111 MOH aO1M 1��fYf�1RR��1",once In Iln Rwaa tl bee _
611NOW A98"tAW COIIP RfIL1RA, tdaaNlR 4 ROM. P.C.
Mf1Nr4efRNIPtl10R ]Sf St. NArb Pldre
fra/MMqm.N.V.M01 Sbten Inland, PT 10101
AttNf RItMN 0. RAN". tan.
d 'n•:;a.. .� '. r..a , u.r .. .�, ta.. sp1a ,.1►a,/vdr
ppp[
"'00, �.
e .�
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT
To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold:
The undersigned applicant hereby applies for >'tCei tffm) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in
accordance with Article 16 of the Town Lav and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town
Planning Board, and represents and states as follows:
1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the
owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said
land under application.)
2. The name of the subdivision is to be .,Minor„Subdivision ,for, Kathleen„B
Var ano........................................... .... .. ...... ..............................
3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule"A” hereto annexed. (Copy of deed
suggested.)
4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as
follows:
Liber .....10746............ Page ......?35......... ... On . DW?PdMT.c.1988,, ;
kllneec ..... .. .................rXQW ... .... .... .. .... ..... $Dn . ............ .......... :
MUM... .....................ftw . .. .......... ......... $kt ....:.... .. ............ ;
RXbtX ... ...... ........ ...... .: itgw . .... .... .... .. .... .. . llia ................... .... ;
NJ{@(dE . .......... .............ftwx ..... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... $tA ....... .... .... .......
�fS�A83iix�ftBx�xMttx>ls�cx�tatEtUt3iid8acutta�Axxit . ............................ .. .... ....
30xgs:dk12*KdM . .......... .. ............. . . .. .. .. .. .. ........ ...........................
. . . .... .. ........ .... ........................... . .. .. .. . . .. .. ................................ .. .
S. The area of the land is ...5; 425;, ,,,,,, acres.
6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the elate hereof have been paidmtUdg ..... .. .....
. .. .......... ...... ................... ..... .... .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. ...... .. ...... .. ............. ...
not
7. The land iskricumhered by ..an)'.mD ache.... .. .. .. .. . . . . ... ... ................... ... .
�mackptPloc�xte�dttilatvmc
(xx�Lkxtt�tpwcrantttbttkafa�dsdkee . .... .. . ...... fxgpc. .. .. .. .... .. .. ... lameiiimtKMOM
x.... .. .. ....... xxpesfd;xeaxmtt-0c... .. . . . .. . :. . . . . . .. . Atekbik;c . .. ...... .... .........
. ............. ]"i+Fdiffs ............ .. .... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. ...... ............... . .. ...
(k}c3itgegxgfocttxomdniciaxicifxx. .. .... . . ftpox. . . .. . .. ..... .. ........3dxmdglettka 0DM
wic . .. ... . .. ....._.JxLm_nCidxatnotV=AC.. .. . . . . .. .. .. . . ..... 3IntWlW ....... ........ ....,..
............. . lalfda7o3 .....• .....• �':..d l {� • 1:. • .. .. ...................
(°9' �tl+xkfm�ibetc ........ ...... VW ................xfmctn*amtMMXMMt
Y+K...... Ott'tamtmxa�...... ................gpj&bjc ......................
...................... )W(IMSc ........... ......... ..... ...................................
8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land XXMk ........................
....................... ...... .................... ........................................
9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts "R'80" Residential Low Density
............
.............. ........ .....................................
10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise,xast
If ...................................... ...................................... ......
11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements.
12. The land (9m) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis-
trict, if within a District, is .... A
No
13./Water mains will be laid by „aopiicar}#
....................... ........... .
xmk�xxx ������ �smaicxaimr.
14.VElectric lines and standards will be installed by
atcatot
.................. ......... .. ...
Il �itadst�a;kx�(met)cofxietmeMeoche�faneorstx�aaid
15.7C—;as mains will be installed by applicant
xdiKx�pcx�xgkt<1tgecwllabrdWi�(c1FJt113ic�]p�t�lg�. ..
16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the
Suffolk County IIighway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same.
17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the
Town of Southold llighnay system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. Indian Neck
Road 3l�town on y of Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. dated Dec. 23, 1980 and
18• r19i'c�L Pe Mx�13,•fini hEgs or structures on the land which are not located and shown
Oil the plat.
19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets ou a(Ijoioing sub-
division in heretofore filed. there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets ml said
9xisting maps at their conjunctions will, the proposed streets.
20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by See.
335 of the Real Property Law.
21. Submit a copy of proposed (feed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex
Schedule "D".
aer .
22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be
a•••.-�:...: as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the
Performance Bond be fixed at ...' -..... .. years. The Performance Bond will be written by
a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F".
DATE . el]..G`: �P ..�.�1.. 19.1.11 ....Kathlee B.
Varano
• ....s......,...,..
(Name of A lieant)• - .
Kenneth J. Varati��— .,c... ::
_ /• /*��'{O
(Signature MM" •
1029 79th Street
Brooklyn, New York 11228
(Address)
stOnSTATE OF NEIN YORK, COUNTY OF ....... ..................... as-
On
the .................. day of................ .......... .... 19. ....., before me personally came
•••................4........................ to lite known to be the individualfdeseribed in and who
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ............ executed the same.
. . ... . . . . . . ..... .. .............................
Notary Public
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ........ .................... as:
On the ................ day ............ of .... ........... 19......, before me personally came
.. . . . . .............. .... . to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de-
pose and tiny that ............ resides at No. ....................................................
. . . . .. . ... .. .. ............. ..... . that . ......................... is the ..........
.................. of ............................. .............................................
the corporation described in and which executed (lie foregoing instrument; that ............ knowa
lite sent of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of lite board of directors of said corporation.
ami that . . . ...... .. . signed ............. . name thereto by like order.
.. ................................ .
Notary Public
rwa suol4o
Non �u1�BcBtaa Yak
a Nrw
STATE OF NEW YORK: ss. Q in O�1 U24.49o2621
COUNTY OF KINGS : 0° KkW
0 ;1 � 94
On this (q day of • , 1990, before me personally came
KATHLEEN B. VARAN0, known to be the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that she
executed the same.
Nota y Public
STATE OF NEW YORK: r MOSKAKqM
ss. NoSme of Now
.01-NU24.49029y1
COUNTY OF KINGS QMIMW N M�
CaMbSI �b.,.j 0,C;V p?
On this day of � 1990, before me ersonally came
SALR VARANO, mown f be' he individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument. and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same.
Notary Public
STATE OF NEW YORK: FRANK BeofUONOee-
14�1�
ss. N0.01-BU244902131 l
COUNTY OF KINGS OMINWd In Kings
Cn ^�oI►..07 $, -,
On this I day of 1990, before me personally came
MARK VARANO, known to b the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same.
Notary Public
FReNKA BUONO
STATE OF NEW YORK: llaNry PubliR stets o1 NswYak
ss. No.01-BU 24-49026!1rD/�—q
COUNTY OF KINGS �GuslIn�s Cou� 9
CWMAwbn bokei 07!20!1• J
On this ��J day of , 1990, before me personally came
KENNETH J. V O, known a the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing in trument and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same.
QjLQi�rJJ""
Not y Public
�.� .1 /r Jeit .tdlileli6M/W�f+er&l+r .
. M_ ft IFNi1t, h6w6�. fh Tean lam
IIMW 9 e naWw« > 1 I"demon. MMM. SM lot 11214
at meStmot. ttld6ty.. M I" lull`
riew J u
�
"I"* 171LW, naidlad at 365 f7 tte6et. SeoA s 1111{ Ilrf
YWeet AS rim&t to Comes and 2ATISM tlNAMS. 40
' NM rirli IMSIS 9ASAU0, reaiJl.q at 7621 Uta A«eeN. ♦1S
��: IA7oMc1 ri 9 reetdlas at 1426 76th Street. l►eeaM. to
1�N A 1/2 Interest as Temnoo Ie e6tYlii• '
_.irbpgrt�oblpit.beYleerArpnrr6dni�MA1fM� .
..�arm �S►WiY�leoWer 6LW `I
rrbyat�tlbeNwdyae.blMiadiby..*Ar6.P".i.1�1�r.�i�ti+
' Y�ri16wMS116M��Srrllrlr61..1��e11�y1wYW�1Srr111�61MS�'^e..�1y•• .t <
%" dYftrbet vessels. Tom of SmeheW. eowq nd , sola
of b M
Tal. t"area prtteel6rly Somalia rd daeerAw m11Mrs
IISIAIR at & Poise 00 the eeeMmerarty otde M lodes&
tinea els "0 to lareeeva by the division lies aetmeM. tM laatS46
come of the Mretmrter described Snreel W the an"-
of IoM esu or 1meery of t?elw ood 2lelrrda/ two/ad tMro aNy
dlvleem Ism, Smith 22' 29' W Met 1141.22 feet to the rMoney,
•• site
�Ie ties
day day, mle 61e S22, its vast iM J10 feet oo seasonal
t�M ere.ry Sea� �l
Lod w W formerly of Sorel/ there &lead said land. S/e tells""
s emrw and dtstameet (1) rima 220 19' 2r vast 777.77 tease (2) ..t
24' 41' W east 709.96 foots (7) Met 300 H' Sr riot MIT foots R) �
brta 790 16' W Nast 91.96 toot to the emtoa&toy alas of Indian
use; sed theme ale" the smtMwtry side of Ind/de bM IdSS.
g11MeS (2) eorw and ddstare&. (1) Natl 14e M' W got 770.1► •
and (2) Some 190 31' W Wt 22.53 feet to the »int or plea of 221tlrID4+:
Being the nor /rears camped to the greater Male by am !
2ussMsr 16, IM and Monded sober ry 27, lost to the lefdell s+omty,
Mitt u Whet SWI vye M.
4 +a:
a�b iaft— Ste�S.IMe 406romwYnt�ineMo�sOr�
t� w�eyb+j"«' ,C'w'i 'AS
odme101a fo•�e `
MI"wtr tea�et"t1eM w0.01e «wereme w w.e r tea wq ri
�tSrry t1 er r.v.rt&�
low".the r.0.her sdw«e�is«d.7�f'
m,c.„.soi*pllyrnteyM�ritrlt
` ktbtimf,a^ 17 A A-teY tleeM�ls..metsyw�ry/
f} �a)Ilstl �whesltyyYd YrMthe_Iwrya.eJry «.s.6.or.s4 sl Aemsd.`
Meso�eo�, sae uu.i tae arbor ml.a.a7 yme
meq+'tYbseowwlrSsw.d•tnr:%h . tMrrsrsl
rMs6 asided
tan&*.4 Per.tar 2.n pe sir delp e'rremd taY"it SON,do 04 i
doom t.
the lsest nd �;'?,
r Std
TR4 yh 4l
was
tlr 1107 r — IttclofoNo r wtw r w tw rla.• r '.
Art /'rd d"Of 3.13, M aa,lahto wa I Oa tltr dar of M .tltdra aaa
w'�rr"e RATIIV.IIt TANW, RAal0 TARAao r••targtun.
aM PAMALI TAFAIID
*m loom"M Y the 664h I dlarI 'r WA-w a tat- r k*A fadUllttf t(WAWA r ta�F
ealalW 0 bMiO!Il�tll01ra6 tr RdwMOt/r11 x1'erttl lb-II1f11MIR Sol O�tRr
tMr aaoeot•
tt ,
�_��� , �( 9
bran rnfxie
�IF�4tM 1.; E
w.w.tw taaa ears.r . wA..w ror.awe
OA rt a"of 11 .Mote we oa dw der of H ,1olooRta I
Ort FrR'a^Nwlt t't'wt�Ir twrR in dgtr w 1110 w 1 not lee dto t�, ItN 1�1tr1,
w rr Ft lor�w r Fo. . 33
Yw 1 r�arWr _ M t Ka`
tM k Y v r t.ata,aW +o rr w=
of 1.0 tr ban"
In SW W"aelttttted tFa imputn
Fwtr•60 y r M it�itWl
Swfte
dt/Iltaf Vali of o N cafrMlto: 8r 1M td t4W ilva ed I, and a4 e+wad the(wt/tY/ i
=41 wdir al Yrbrabd of ill an of old11e M tFM M. a�atFQY�ltr MA rr �1 .o m
0% Ittal k tl/wd V tro raleo by i c Wn at the taws tome MwrtrW% aar r�IIIit1Y mom
p i,s.
• e3mlawe nub
t[RI:M A4 bred K
71fis OLOC7 7
Lar
6
IM.Utato of plhttdr Mt[ 41111111111:�TOIrR..f retonfo
IV Prrw1.•.. •ro,, a alio LFd lan j.,L I.Aw
►aMbea raraaa. a. to ., 1/7 Intrrr d n. I•nanl In F1•n.nn, aardr a Nopm to
a11A RatFb rn ^..rtann. RV Io Car an.• and 1'.twnu..1. Cat nn.•, as CmArA TITU t11111"m Oarrale
Irnnlr •, 1'/H 4 :N1111.a Cnram+. as to a 117 fnterftt as
�1t11��fr•tiY lranntf to t:n aatrMt�Rr
Yd1E11ALAMTRWTCOW OOLl' "MARLt a rm. r.0.
M
MYrtmtl PLAM 39
6
St. Narta ►ldee
,A
ormuldi .T.111181 Staten It la+d. MT 10301 ,
1,11141"marnt SI eFa•a D. RttM. Lap.
F y
a� nTJA
r ,
♦.,+ a.r Y y,
134
s
mama
, T
PLAN G BQ D
TORE�,i 0 "SOU ;It LD
Sy
u t
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED
WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD '-- Z�
Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning
Board with your completed applications forms. If your .answer-
to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate
these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate
evidence:
1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Xaa No
(Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined
by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference)
2. Are there any other premises under your ownership
abutting this parcel? Cas No
3. Are there any building permits pending on
this parcel? Xaa No
9 . Are there any other applications pending
concerning this property before any other
department or agency? (Town , State, County, etc. ) :KEN No
5. Is there any application pending before
any other agency with regard to a different
project on this parcel? MW No
6. Was this property the subject of any prior
application to the Planning Board? Yes MID
7. Does this property have a valid certificate
of occupancy, if yes please submit .a Copy of same Xx= No
I certify that the above statements are true and will be relied
on by Ohe Planning Board in considering this application.
o
Signature 6f property owner .Vr authorized aqent d to
Kathl en arano Sal R. Vaxano
Ke� J. V rano
/ Mark Vaxano
aft
STATE 'OF NEW YORK:
SS. Zi _�9 11r1t
rin
COUNTY OF KINGS C0Wd",=1M iK Vq,?/
On thistq day of S +, 1990, before me personally came
KATHLEEN B. VARANO, know�to be the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that she
executed the same.
Z Notary Public
STATE OF NEW YORK: ss. � dMBWVMk
COUNTY OF KINGSn1 �
R.On this 11 day of 1990, before me personally came
SAL VARANO, known to be the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same. 1*71
otary Public
STATE OF NEW YORK: MIIMN�
ss.
COUNTY OF KINGS � RN�
On this I day of � „ 1990, before me personally came
MARK VARANO, known to b the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same. ✓ �/
Notary Public
STATE OF NEW YORK: ROMP�A. yYdt
ss. No,O1-W 244902531
COUNTY OF KINGS in CwnmWMon KkN�/O9qr
On this/C day of 1990, before me personally came
KENNETH J. VARANO, known be the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same.
Notqfy Public
red •-x:, .:� ::, cn
of ui� �. : yr,r,d •,.,r �n�e�
GPM AMOM
�141pt�op M A
//WC\�0�lIIr11 MWIIIIAa
MW
fxif ..t 9 . MoM
fit::�y. . N •;. ..dti^^»l+J
September 19, 1990
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Minor Subdivision for
Kathleen B. Varano
Gentlemen:
The following statements are offered for your consideration
in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its
referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission:
(1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential
building is proposed.
(2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the
grades of the existing roads.
(3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing
structures are proposed.
Yours truly,
athlee B. Varano
a W*
Sal arano
Mark Varano
Kenneth - Varano
L2
. :4164(9164)
n PROJECT I.D.NUMBER
NOORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
DIVISION OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS
Slate Environmental Quality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
PART 1 Project Information(To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor)
• 1. Applicant/sponsor 7. Project Name Minor Subdivision for
Kathleen B. Varano Kathleen B. Varano '
S. Project location:
Municipality Town of Southold County of Suffolk
t. Is proposed action:
❑ New ❑ Expansion ® Modakatksnldleratlon -
S. Describe project briefly:
Application for a minor subdivision into three. residential lots.
6. Precise location(mad Intersections,prominent landmarks,etc.or provide map) -
Southerly side of Indian Neck Road, Peconic, New York.
(Suffolk County Tax Map No. District 1000, Section 086.00 ,
Block 07. 00 , Lot 004.000)
7. Amount of land affected:
• Initially L. 425 acres Ultimately 5•425 acres
B. Will proposed action comply with existing zoning or other existing land use restrictions#
® Yes ❑ No It No,describe briefly
9. What is present land use in vicinity of project?
® Residential ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Agriculture ❑ Parklandlopen space ❑ Other
Describe:
Existing dwelling and vacant land.
10. Does action involve a permitiapproval,or funding,now or ultimately,from any other governmental agency(Federal,state w loca0t
13 Yes ❑ No It Yes,list agencv(s)and permitlapprovab I
Southold Town Planning Board
11. Does any aspect of she action have a currently valid permit or apprevdf
® Yes ❑ No If yes,list agency name and permitlappro nal type
Suffolk County Health Department - Article 6
17. As result of proposed action will existing permitlairproval require modificationt
❑ Yes 12 No
1 C;=zX
ROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST F MY KNOWLEDGE
Applicant/sponsorqJ
namr. �`
Date. Q
en B. Varano arano
Signature:
Kemeth J. Varano Mark Varapo
If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the
Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment
OVER OC 1 2
2 199!i
PART II Environmental Aselornent(To be completed by Agency) • '
A. Does action exceed any Type I threshold In 6 NYCRR,Part 617.121 If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULLAONG FORM EAF.
❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Will action receive coordinated review as provided for Unlisted Actions In 6 NYCRR,Part 617.71 If No,a negative declaration may be superceded by another
Involved action. -
❑ Yes ❑ No
C. Could action result in ANY adverse effects on,to,Or Origins from the following:(Answen may be handwritten.If legible)
C1. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,min levels,editing traffic;um mu,solid waste production a dlsprsal,potential fa erosion,
drainage or flooding problems?Explain briefly:
u. Historic,archeological,visual a enthetic,a other natural Of cultural resources;agricultural districts;or community as neighborhood cluncto?Explain Willy
Cl. Vegetation or fauna,movement of fish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened a endangered species?Explain briefly:
Ce. A communkys existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use a Intensity of use of land a other natural resources/Explain briefly.
CS. Growth,'subsequent development.Of related activities likely to be Induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly.
C6. Secondary,cumulative,or other effects not identified In C1L6?Explain briefly. --
C7. A change in we of either quantity or type of enerayt Explain briefly.
PART III Determination of Significance(To be completed by Agency)
INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, Important or otherwise
significant. Each effect should be assessed,in connection with Its(a)setting(i.e. urban or rural);(b)probability of occurring;
(c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e)geographic scope; and(f)magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting
materials. Ensure that explanations contain Sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse Impacts have been Identified
and adequately addressed.
❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur.Then
proceed directly to the FULL/LONG FORM EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration.
❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation,
that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental Impacts AND provide here, and on
attachments as necessary, the reasons supportng this determination:
t
Agency Name Agency Preparer's Name
Prepanls Slgaaturefrille
Date
RICHARD F. LARK -
.i.,_,�.,.�
ATTORNEY AT LAW
MAIN ROAD- P. O. BOX 973
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935
TELEPHONE 516 734-6607 ,
August 17, 1989
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971 �,v �/�✓
RE: Dominick Varano
Minor Subdivision
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
I hereby request you extend sketch plan approval
on the above captioned subdivision for a period of six
months. I am having difficulty obtaining Article 6
approval from the Health Department, and expect to have
everything resolved within two months.
Very truly ours,
ichard F. /rk
RFL/dmc
1 1
c�Rik t� 4(z� s
RICHARD F. LARK
ATTORNEY AT LAW
MAIN ROAD- P.O. BOX 973
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 AUG I 8 1989TELEPHONE 516 734-6807 n V
August 17, 1989
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
RE: Dominick Varano
Minor Subdivision
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
I hereby request you extend sketch plan approval Ae
on the above captioned subdivision for a period of six
months. I am having difficulty obtaining Article 6
approval from the Health Department, and expect to have
everything resolved within two months.
Very truly yours,
,L�i
ichard F. rk
RFL/dmc
RICHARD R LARK '
ATTORNEY AT LAW ~
MAIN ROAD-P.O. BOX 973 JAN 1 8 1989
.CUTCHOOUE,NEW YORK 11933 �--
+WnLEPNONE 316734-6907 SOUTHOI� " .',J
PLANN;tiG
January 16, 1989
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall - Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
ATT: Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman
RE: Minor Subdivision for Kathleen B. Varano
(Suffolk County Tax Map No. District 1000 ,
Section 086.00 , Block 07 .00 , Lot 004.000 )
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
Pursuant to the resolution of the Southold Town Planning
Board on June 10, 1985, I had the surveyor revise the map
to locate the right-of-way on the westerly property line.
Accordingly, I am enclosing twelve prints of the survey by
Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. , last amended January 3, 1989, so that
you can make the necessary referrals.
Be advised that I am in the process of obtaining
Article 6 approval and I will advise you of same so that a
public hearing can be scheduled on this matter.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact
me.
:Vichard
lyYark
RFL/bd F.
Enclosures
i
i -
i
0
0 ti
h S. ZzOz9 •J0"A -
40X.
V h ✓o10'
i N tri 1
i
J h y
75-. Yz ,'A �q Z , h l
ow�qe Wall
I
�. '•i s•.J i _.
-. . 9• '� � � J!/._Ori +.. ..
� z•3 _ A- _ ��_,no„� —'-T 309. 5
39'26'Jnl..dJ,Z8'-
lre
I Z 9 L 94
� 0 0
T
I
I L
i
ITel!__E N j
�`�GCUN/C
rvE-w Y.,otz4
SCHEDULE 8
Page 6>r6 of 11
r .fi 1040 Ago
I
FleEa : 3:-4'Z
NO„F.,5
Z.<%2JF'3fLtY' LS IN RtlILJI
j 4 7-1rE wATfIZ SURFLY ANL
f ,FrACIL/T(gS FOQ 464. W
i
3.4'i77: 771,6 A
THE 6tJF/-OLL GQ OEF*ji.
i
1�2n�BSSIANgI. LAN
/J6 w yr mg 6>Rr6 1
aAE"Ml°baT
ANrvw�b wrwi�w.NQ11�ew�/d�dwr
SUSNOTOCOVENOPM&FM
��FrJc�Co. Dergar
rip=�Y
too
11�Ut��M�wM �
r
i1M M agM
�w�b�a/f oa�MMr•
'�rMir�..a.�.��i�.�r•M�i
an".0"md on
�.
lits �.
ore .
_ Page 7 of
114 9. z a
u.-._.._.. — -- —..
d � z
k
h
6rC,970
V AVb"f'�IOOI�
Q�frrrrTnrt VII
G .drivewey � 383. 41 it
la
ey
1 /
,r
/NVIMN NEf:& 2040
ReC4NlC, Al. Y, 119"
rHQL,U
raxsr IMLC
LOAM I
Page 8 of 11
FO4 '400 SAsJO ..T
u` 2. N/AYQF: 1
N6 ZONE .Q-80 ;
� JSEWRciB GlSFrOSAI,
TS Oti' 7 oYAO MAR r N!'L Y
SNC/ k'ECU/4'.6MBt/7"8 Cf' frr:'[,QSS ,*vtr:vnA.
ay.wcv r O/r NEAL TH. !�DABTIr(
rpm
'C 3Uk:YE'YO� 9 IrI �' 1 � ;y••
le-eivSB NaZS6�Z6 14 ' 1 '
mom /0933 1 �c.¢au..o wArsa
40
� .Nl,cct POW r
iR �IiAL1MD j
AVA MO
Ike
b
*AV ` emdonianm..
M � Ca
y pbr Nlh!n eta�-yn�m mA paryp
mbuned 3sddw0rrolbautdnad
t m
bbaara9dame"IL
. Ow..•meq bww"lI r IeF•lnay
y Q adYbV+a Fa�aarr lar ad:an d.��:vd�
laj
� aP.E. dda tCM:a`t•RMMIL.r t•' :•.)ad
dismas"Chow
�rr�i� Mno1n0.:�. ,5ew
Page. .9 of 11
7.
:ANC s•'rt l1 t
7'YP/CA4L
i
(,[•,,:Xtn F. a'A.1 rrN r4 rc 66806 �
`' � i•:NlSN.l� Get.
.;'NAY• _ Mi►x.
900 �Ac. s6nrrc rANr_
WE tiOMEf31i C42VAY THAT N4 4,&-r ON
7&/J M.9P Ia i-sji TfrAA/ 7$DOo QG.F7:
/N.0AWA .OAIV 7WA7- rNf6WAP K/Ad
&1#40& SV U.1 M-Or4 AG7v4v- duRYfFY6 r»r
CoMPLO7'6o 06'C. ILS 1994ANa THAT ,� c
co vCQETA 'MbN u evlE+vrS sNiVS sire"
sxr ,ar �o/Nrs• S�towN r�+r/Sr o �( 1
R-OATR/CX Vi9" Tu YL P C. I.."
u�cs^asav r.oNQ su¢veri�rp,¢,s
Sld.'rPsl6!Oi2Y' - J�IK 1V j/ORK
Page 11 of 11 /N6Z -6
i
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
o Town Hall,53095 Main Road
Richard G. Ward, Chairman w 2 P. O. Box 1179
George Ritchie Latham,Jr. O Southold, New York 11971
BMarkiSOMcDonald r y�O( � Fax (516) 765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MINUTES
May 18 , 1995
Present were : Richard G. Ward , Chairman
Bennett Orlowski , Jr .
G. Ritchie Latham
Kenneth Edwards
William Cremers
Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner
Melissa Spiro, Planner
Robert G. Kassner , Site Plan Reviewer
Martha A. Jones , Secretary
Mr . Ward : Good evening . I 'd like to call the May 18 , 1995 Planning
Board meeting to order . The first order of business is the setting
of Monday June 12 , 1995 at 7 : 30 p .m. , Southold Town Hall , Main Rd . ,
Southold , as the time and place for the next regular Planning Board
meeting .
Mr . Edwards : So moved .
Mr . Latham: Second .
Mr . Ward : Moved and seconded . All in favor?
Ayes : Mr . Orlowski , Mr . Latham, Mr . Edwards , Mr . Cremers , Mr . Ward
Mr . Ward : Opposed? Motion carried .
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Mr . Ward : 7 : 00 p .m. Kathleen Varano -- This minor subdivision is
for 3 lots on 5 . 425 acres located on the south side of Indian Neck
Road in Peconic . SCTM# 1000--86--7--4 . Is the applicant here or
agent for the applicant?
Richard Lark : Yes , I ' m Richard Lark, Main Rd . , Cutchogue , New
York, for the applicant . I think we 've met all the requirements of
not only the Health Department but of the Planning Board here and
the Board of Appeals . I think we 've finally got this thing squared
away and the map, I think , meets with all your requirements .
Southold Town Plar*g Board 2 . May 18 , 1995
The required Covenants have been recorded , so I ' d urge you to move for
approval of the subdivision submitted .
Mr . Ward: Is there anybody else here this evening that would like
to address the Board regarding this subdivision? If not , is all in
order to close the hearing? Is there a motion to that effect?
Mr . Orlowski : So moved .
Mr . Ward : Is there a second?
Mr . Cremers : Second .
Mr . Ward : Motion seconded . All in favor?
Ayes : Mr . Orlowski , Mr . Latham, Mr . Edwards , Mr . Cremers , Mr .
Ward .
Mr . Ward : Opposed? Motion carried . What ' s the pleasure of the
Board?
Mr . Orlowski : I make a motion that
WHEREAS, Kathleen Varano is the owner of the property known and
designated as SCTM# 1000-86-7-4 , located on the south side of
Indian Neck Road in Peconic; and
WHEREAS, this proposed minor subdivision , to be known as minor
subdivision for Kathleen Varano, is for 3 lots on 5 .425 acres; and
WHEREAS , a variance was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals
(Appl . # 4281 ) on November 2 , 1994; and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board , pursuant to the State
Environmental Quality Review Act , (Article 8) , Part 617 , declared
itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on November
14 , 1994; and
WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision
application at Town Hall , Southold , New York on May 18, 1995; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the
Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore
RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and
authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated December
16 , 1994 .
Mr . Latham: Second .
Mr . Ward : Motion seconded . All in favor?
Ayes : Mr. Orlowski , Mr . Latham, Mr . Edwards , Mr . Cremers , Mr . Ward
1 PHONE:852_2000
SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Edward P. RQmaitiP, COUNTY CLERK
.i1VF.til lEPli, Nh- Yon" 119()1
own of Southold Assessor
Town of Southold Planning Board
Chief Deputy County Treasurer
To Whom This May Concern:
The Subdivision Map Of : KQ,+hleerl VClt,(Qnb
Was Filed ,
Filed Number ,
A} stract Number , 12- 153
Township , Southold — le_CAniCC CSG)P1-# IOUp-
Owner :
Very truly yours,
County Clerk
D
Map Department 1 3 M
�nn No. 49
Submission Without A Cover Letter
Date: 5 I 1 g�5,-
Sender: Ban &aAQ /�ice Ltnl 5 6 fC ,
Subjeet: Va fana
SCTM#: Y000- F4 -7-`{
Comments: 7 Pty"fS- � m�(Gn5 Fob Si�xtltc�
L., ! 81995
SOUTp- 'D!n' IN
i
RICHARDARK • IAnG
ATTORNEY AW
MAIN ROAD- P. O. BOX 979 DATE: May 12, 1995
FROM: CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11995 -
TELEPHONE(516)794-6807 ATTENTION: Melissa Spiro
FAX(516)754-5169
TO: SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD SUBJECT: Minor fi bd v;cion for
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. 0. Box 1179 Kathleen Varano
Southold &Y-11971 MESSAGE REPLY DATE:
Dear-,Ms.- Spiro:- -
Per
earMs. Spiro:_Per your request-- I_am enclosing
a copy of the Declaration of Covenants
and Restrictions dated May3s 1995 and
recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk' s
Office on May 11, 1995 in Liber 11725
Page 65. j— -{r :r
-- _
MpY------
15 I9`3
- --
Very truly yours, _
SOUTb1Y D
SIGNED: .___ _ .__ -__-___.___ SIGNED:
Ri and F. tar (bd)
HISTACOUNT CORP.. MELVILLE. N. Y. 11746 FORM NO. SK-2 THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED,
BOXES-5 THRU 9 MUST BE TYPE R PRINTED IN BLACK INK ONL OR TO RECORDING 04�:ILING.
1 I SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 2 3
lJP# 11725 PC 06
Number of pages ''t n 4
orno f�1
��-0 — 9
serial# GCDo =
Certificate# D Z•-
-� $ N
Deed/Mortgage Instrument Deed!Mortgage Tax Stamp Recording/Filing Stamps
4 F
Page/Filing Fee :16 ._ Mortgage Amt.
Handling � 1. Basic Tax _
TP-584 2.SONYMA
Notation Sub Total _
EA-5217(County) Sub Total ._ 3.Spec./Add.
EA-5217(State) TOT.MTG.TAX _
RP.T.S.A. /S.CV Dual Town_Dual County_
Held for Apportionment_
Comm.of Ed.
•'�y_ • Transfer Tax _
Affidavit �
Manston Ta: _
Certified Copy The property covered by this mortgage
is or will be improved by a one or two
Reg, Copy _ Sub Total c:>Qe1 family dwelling only.
/
YES— or NO_
i)Other ��._ GRAND TOTAL H NO,see appropriate tax clause on
µ page# of this instrument.
Regi perty Tax Service Agency Verification . `' Title Company Information
14l1'@t w
77DI Section Blo k Lot
na1M�
1000 086. 00 07. 00 004.000 N/A
Company Name
N/A
Title Number
FEE PAID BY:
7 Cash_Check•_Charge RICHARD F. LARK
ATTORNEY AT LKN
Payer same as R&R X LP?ln Eoa9 - P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, NY 11836 -09»
OR
8 RECORD & RETURN TO
9 Suffolk County Recording & Endorsement Page
DeclaTat}on of Covenants and
This page forms part of the attached Restrictions made by:
(Deed, Mortgage, etc.)
KATHLEEN VARANO The premises herein is situated in
r n 'j SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK.
Iu1 LS l:i N? _.. Ie
P'1 a t � _ In the TOWN of Southold
j, MAY 1'995
In the VILLAGE
" or HAMLET of Peconic
Paae 1 of 11 ^ ^•
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS
DECLARATION made this 3rd day of May , 1995, by KATHLEEN
VARANO, individually and as Trustee under Last Will and Testament
of Dominick Varano, residing at 1024 79th Street, Brooklyn,
New York 11228; MARIO VARANO, as Trustee under Last Will and
Testament of Dominick Varano, residing at 7621 18th Avenue,
Brooklyn, New York 11214; and PASQUALE VARANO, as Trustee under
Last Will and Testament of Dominick Varano, residing at 1426
74th Street, Brooklyn, New York 11228, hereinafter called the
Declarants.
WHEREAS, the Declarants have title to certain land situate,
lying and being at Peconic, in the Town of Southold, County of
Suffolk and State of New York, said land being more particularly
described in Schedule A attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold did on
December 12, 1994 grant sketch approval on the parcel of land
described in Schedule A into a minor subdivision of three lots to
be known as "Minor Subdivision for Kathleen Varano at Peconic,
Town of Southold, New York" , a copy of which map is attached
hereto as Schedule B.
WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold resolved
on December 12, 1994 and February 6, 1995, there should be place
on the subdivision the following covenants and restrictions:
1 . The cost for the maintenance of the common driveway shown
on the minor subdivision map shall be paid equally between the
owners of Lot Nos. 1, 2 and 3 on said map.
Paqe 2 of 11
2 . Clearing and cutting in the areas outside the building
envelopes, as shown on Schedule B, shall be limited to that
necessary for proper maintenance and removal of diseased, decayed
or dead material and obnoxious plant species . Clearing and
grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for
siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as
much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible.
3. These Covenants and Restrictions can be modified only at
the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of
a majority plus one of the Planing Board of the Town of Southold
after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be
entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to
such modification shall not be required.
Declarants do hereby further warrant, covenant and represent
that the foregoing restrictions and agreement shall bind the
undersigned, their heirs, successors and assigns, and any and all
person or persons who shall succeed to the ownership of said
premises or any part thereof by transfer or otherwise.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarants have duly executed this
Declaration the day and year first above written.
✓j���. !LL-�cdticr�
KatMeen Varano, individually and
as T of Do I lick Varano
ari Varano, as T/U/W of
Dom nick Varano
5�,e�_ .6"44oA,
Pas uale arano, as T/U/W of
Dominick Varano
Page 3 of 11
STATE OF NEW YORK:
as.
COUNTY OF SUFFoL K :
On this 3j day of (1r1Ry , 1995, before me personally came
KATHLEEN VARANO to me known to be the individual described in and
who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she
executed the same.
Notary Public
BRRCldTtA 0r'/'1111N
NdmyFtdl%^„,"011haYmk
th.4635190. C=ly
Co m wlr!-;n L.n4-3 GQr.S?er 91,19%
STATE OF NEW YORK:
/ . SS .
COUNTY OF '
Fix
On this .?"'' day of , 1995, before me personally came
MARIO VARANO to me known to be the individual described in and
who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he
executed the same.
Notary'-'Public
TERESA MASTERSON '
NOTARY PUBLIC.$tab of NOW York
Na 24_4747121 i
0uP11fled In qnp co”
Celnmlulen EXPI"API"2O,I";r
STATE OF NEW YORK:
11�� s s .
COUNTY OF lir"uI ` :
On this A 6k411day of e , 1995, before me personally came
PASQUALE VARANO to me known to be the individual described in and
who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he
executed the same.
f-Ze -n�d�o
Notary Public
• f: t
wirrM n. rrnnnnr)
Ynrk
i
Page, 4 of 1] (}u,G. o I �p
SCHEDULE A
All Host cerlain Phil, piece or parcel of luld, wills Ilse bulidlnp and Improeemerds !hereon erected, situate,
lyln` arsdbeingstanf at Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk
and State of New York, being more particularly bounded and
described as follows:
16� BEGINNING at a point on the southeasterly side of Indian
Neck Road where the same is intersected by the division line
between the northeasterly corner of the hereinafter described
parcel. and the northwesterly corner of land now or formerly
of Guinan and Richards; running thence along said division
line, South 22' 29 ' 30" East 1149. 23 feet to the ordinary
high water .Line of Peconic Bay; thence along the ordinary
high water line of Peconic Bay, South 61' 22 ' 10" West 197 . 79
feet to the easterly side of land now or formerly of Dubru.l;
thence along said land, the following four (4) courses and
distances: (l.) North 22' 19 ' 20" West 733.77 feet; 12) North
24' 49 ' 00" West 309. 96 feet•t (3) North 30' 28 ' 30" West 71 . 27
feet; 14) North 39' 26 ' 00" West 97. 94 feet Ito Lite southeasterly
side of Indian Neck Roars; and thence along the southeasterly
side cif Indian Neck Road, the following two (2) courses and
distancen: (1) North 74 ' 44 ' 40" East 226. 57 feetr and (2)
South 09' 31 ' 00" East 22 . 53 feet to the point or place of
BEGINNING.
r
1
Page 5 of 11
1 U
.y'
�oP o° fs) �.•r;ri
ti
. 01V
Y AO• �'
IiY N fT ' i j r- 1
I
>d
V �_ hedf a•a//
t r feat hold r)
_.
• , B6.Bl-,. s8.r8,
. : -. • r ;•no•'W. •x_309. 5
_�.Gti•- 71.27 ... �.?
C y7.94
r
19
► lar ,VvL
r'�:F/'ftk'EG Ft
A T
- �n/E�hi ,YORK
SCHEDULE B
Page 6 of 11
•- r, S� /00 moo
3CAL�s rYD,
i
R�eE,a 3,4z
I
rtlorr CV 1,
j z.<7roF•ercry I44 IN rrulLOI
a T7JE WA7'E/Z S!/PPLY ANL
PAC/LIrlffs AWORL ALL LO
NJi?7a r7�E ,STAa/DA!s OS •�
rNe dc/FY-OL,fL C1Q,OEPiI,
Il�R�XB33IONq�. LAN
NB w YO MAC 5-rows l
QAIf'�NpbRT
AArN�Mw�wiiw�wM M�w�d yew •"'•••'�'�'�
[mono •�
auF'r JL.IG Co. Dy QrA�t�
SKY
7�rb�MyrM �
ir
MI
Page 7 of 11_.
9f p
Bo,970 6 «i... r
ial qi
d •O
driveway
8-4. 4;e
+b t:. aT� •: g .rn..v.. �
ey
1r, N(l")
OwAly AN_L DGV6i7,OPED_F r-
A'ATN!_EXN �/A/tgNp
/No/:au NE.'rL. iZOAO
PCCONIG, Al. Y. I/9"
►'NOI.0
re sr Noce
.SgNOY I
L4pM
Page 8 of 11
FOo "400• SANG -�
r 0
rj•a r..
S.Ac.
900 - 86- 7-4
Nd ZONE 6L-80
TS Ort rdym MAO COMOL Y
INC/ AZEGU/4'SME>/7'6 CF' rrJ(/N!'•A.
Pl:(.ESJ
p..TMQNr oor N6A(,r//, .oOAorew'.,
rl
7 d fLw1F.
'O 3U�YEYUK � '�'II ••_� �I �1 rS..
rcFuae Na Z66,Z6
14 '
IMCnOui�N�R 1 33 jFc(x�u..o dvwrn>re
40' W/r/.L po,rlr
ION
ROW
Somme=LM
shoo
,.�...�.rlla�•
d
COOIM 070181 Cpr yn:�MJI�O
M YM pp+May MBAt■■OIp
«Iew■ee,w a1u■a7,.■■pwe.w
ll� t�M1 . 1!M. pe■a11■war■y�
Gw.nlai8detppdMnon engnn
MY b UN C■IOw�f■(wha■0�^nj
la jow"IL amm .. ptl■tcvl , s1 /bpd
dwmwjwamm � 71Igy11 W1d
Paee. .9.of. 11 r
i
t Q •t� � � v
o. ( W Z }
l z j I
77
I � .
iI
,c�F.l! j /IO. � •. �
i
r Ywc at_ 4
I
.frNlSNdp sa.+ns I�
t-n
Page 10 Of 11 j !Pa'.doar 1 j
SNNC P'tL I-
7•VPICAL CLF416~1.
I
� � I
t '
LO..:R1lHn C447'IN.4 TO 6lZAD0
y I 1 FworSN`L` 6IL.
}1qX {' +NnX.
f.Nta1NBY' '
900 4LAL. 6 Cv7c TANK
WE NE/ rSV' CdRr,FY 7)VAr NO 4&r 014
TeW.l rd'9P /a L esi r"soov 7.0.000 d@.p7: SEA,L
IN.Gaq'A A,VD77ygTTM16WOO W446
M.oaB By u3 MO&7 A677V" JUA Yd F I
dOMPiersp oats Ids !994AND rAWr
CoAcYlE•/�! ir{bnruM�+wrB rigvi a riv ^+ �•� nx
.sxr ,ar P,o,nr-7-s• swowt�r r�vvst o 1 �, ;�
RODEl2/Cc VAIV rwr'L 'R(:
/Z Y �" ' `O uNu
L.lerviso ZANo suRV�N ;s
ic�a EEfi6!oar" - ,�f�e iv'�pgAG
Page 11 of 11
i
RICHARD F.IAK • y(2'�
ATTORNEY A49
MAIN ROAD-P.O. BOX 979 DATE: May 8 1995
FROM: CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11995
i
S
Melissa Dro__
-
TELEPHONE (518) 794-8907 ATTENTION: Me —
FAX(515)794-5169
F
TO: SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD _ SUBJECT: Minor .&tdivision for- _
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P 0 BOX 1179 Kathleen.Varano _.__ —
Southold NY 11971
MESSAGE _--_- _-_ REPLY DATE: --- ---
Dear Ms. Spiro__ ___ — ---- --
Enclosed is Check No. 1040 of__-_ _C�rr 1fLC1(QHL¢✓ -- --
Kathleen Varano payable to the Town of
Southold in the amount of _$4,000.00_
for the park and playground fee.
Very trul_yyouursr -
- iMlrfi 0 ��-
bC�Tiu �
SIGNED
SIGNED:
- �
R chard P. La (bd)
HISTACOUNT CORP.. MELVILLE. N. Y. 1174E FORM NO. SK-2 THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
o�osuF�ucxoo
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Richard G.Ward, Chairman w Z Town Hall,53095 Main Road
George Ritchie Latham,Jr. 0 ^+ P. O. Box 1179
O Southold, New York 11971
BMark S. McDona dennett Orlowski, r y�Oj ,1� � Fax(516)765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards "� Telephone(516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
May 2, 1995
Mr. Richard Lark
Attorney at Law
Main Road
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, NY 11935
RE: Minor Subdivision
of Kathleen Varano
SCTM #1000-86-7-4
Dear Mr. Lark:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a
meeting held on May 1, 1995:
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Thursday, May 18, 1995 at
7:00 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated December 16, 1994.
Sincerely yours,
7Xr /Q �# V06J
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
RICHARD F. LARK
ATTORNEY AT LAW
MAIN ROAD- P. O. BOX 973
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935
TELEPHONE 516 734-6807
RICHARD F. LARK
MARY LOU FOLTS May 1, 1995
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ATT: Melissa Spiro, Planner
RE: Minor Subdivision for Kathleen Varano
SCTM #1000-086. 00-07. 00-004 .000
Dear Ms. Spiro:
In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am
enclosing two mylars and five paper prints of the "Minor
Subdivision for Kathleen Varano" prepared by Roderick
Van Tuyl, P.C. dated Dec . 16 , 1994 .
Kindly schedule this matter on the Planning Board agenda
as soon as possible for the final hearing.
Very truly yours,
C�A4
RFL/bd Richard F. Lark
Enclosures
�'JFUR� UI
RICHARD F. LARK MS
ATTORNEY AT LAW P-6
MAIN ROAD- P. O. BOX 973
CUTCHOOUE, NEW YORK 11935
TELEPHONE 516 734-6807
RICHARD F LARK
MARY LOU FOLTS February 14, 1995
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ATT: Melissa Spiro
RE: Minor Subdivision for Kathleen Varano
SCTM #1000-086 . 00-07 . 00-004 . 000
Dear Ms . Spiro:
Pursuant to the resolutions of the Southold Town
Planning Board adopted on December 12, 1994 and February 6,
1995, I am enclosing a copy of the proposed Declaration
of Covenants and Restrictions for review by the Planning
Board and the Town Attorney. Kindly let me know if the
Declaration meets with their approval .
Very truly yours,
RFL/bd Richard F. Lar
Enclosure
FEB IT M
SOUTHOLDTOWN
PLANNING BOARD
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS
DECLARATION made this day of , 1995, by KATHLEEN
VARANO, individually and as Trustee under Last Will and Testament
of Dominick Varano, residing at 1024 79th Street, Brooklyn,
New York 11228; MARIO VARANO, as Trustee under Last Will and
Testament of Dominick Varano, residing at 7621 18th Avenue,
Brooklyn, New York 11214; and PASQUALE VARANO, as Trustee under
Last Will and Testament of Dominick Varano, residing at 1426
74th Street, Brooklyn, New York 11228, hereinafter called the
Declarants .
WHEREAS, the Declarants have title to certain land situate,
lying and being at Peconic, in the Town of Southold, County of
Suffolk and State of New York, said land being more particularly
described in Schedule A attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold did on
December 12, 1994 grant sketch approval on the parcel of land
described in Schedule A into a minor subdivision of three lots to
be known as "Minor Subdivision for Kathleen Varano at Peconic,
Town of Southold, New York" , a copy of which map is attached
hereto as Schedule B.
WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold resolved
on December 12, 1994 and February 6, 1995, there should be place
on the subdivision the following covenants and restrictions :
1 . The cost for the maintenance of the common driveway shown
on the minor subdivision map shall be paid equally between the
owners of Lot Nos. 1, 2 and 3 on said map. D
FEB 1 71996
i
SOUiHCLO T04'JiV
i
PLANNING BOARD
I
2 . Clearing and cutting in the areas outside the building
envelopes, as shown on Schedule B, shall be limited to that
necessary for proper maintenance and removal of diseased, decayed
or dead material and obnoxious plant species . Clearing and
grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for
siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as
much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible.
3 . These Covenants and Restrictions can be modified only at
the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of
a majority plus one of the Planing Board of the Town of Southold
after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be
entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to
such modification shall not be required.
Declarants do hereby further warrant, covenant and represent
that the foregoing restrictions and agreement shall bind the
undersigned, their heirs, successors and assigns, and any and all
person or persons who shall succeed to the ownership of said
premises or any part thereof by transfer or otherwise.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarants have duly executed this
Declaration the day and year first above written.
Kathleen Varano, individually and
as T/U/W of Dominick Varano
Mario Varano, as T/U/W of
Dominick Varano
Pasquale Varano, as T/U/W of
Dominick Varano
i
STATE OF NEW YORK:
ss .
COUNTY OF
On this day of , 1995, before me personally came
KATHLEEN VARANO to me known to be the individual described in and
who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she
executed the same.
Notary Public
STATE OF NEW YORK:
as .
COUNTY OF
On this day of , 1995, before me personally came
MARIO VARANO to me known to be the individual described in and
who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he
executed the same.
Notary Public
STATE OF NEW YORK:
. as.
COUNTY OF
On this day of 1995, before me personally came
PASQUALE VARANO to me known to be the individual described in and
who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he
executed the same.
Notary Public
SCHEDULE A
All that certabt plol, piece or parcel of land, wllit lite ImIldlop and Improvements thereon erected, situate,
lyingandbeingn mK at Peconic, Town of Southold, -County of Suffolk
and State of New York, being more particularly bounded and
described as follows:
AN BEGINNING at a point on the southeasterly aide of Indian
Neck Road where the same is intersected by the division line
between the northeasterly corner of the hereinafter described
parcel. and the northwesterly corner of land now or formerly
of Guinan and Richards; running thence along said division
line, South 22° 29 ' 30" East 1149. 23 feet to the ordinary
high water .Line of Peconic Bay; thence along the ordinary
high water line of Peconic Day, South 61° 22 ' 10" West 197 . 79
feet- to the easterly side of land now or formerly of Dubrul;
thence along said land, the following four (4) courses and
distances: (l.) North 220 1.9 ' 20" West 733 .77 feet; (2) North
24" 49 ' 00" West 309. 96 feet, (3) North 30° 28 ' 30" West 71 . 27
feet; (4 ) North 39e 26 ' 00" West 97. 94 feet I:o the southeasterly
side of. Indian Neck Road; and thence along the southeasterly
side cif Indian Neck Road, the following two (2) courses and
distancen: (1) NorLh 740 44 ' 40" East 226 . 57 feet; and (2)
South 890 31 ' 00" East 22 . 53 feet to the point or place of
BEGINNT.NG.
j h
t '
h
Art
ftof 4040 O
71,27 ,
9.0
40 0
sew.
277,
Exr
r,.,
N Pte.
��._ j X
i
I
1
SCHEDULE 9
1
I �
r ,
t
� r •I w.rQ
J. SU A.9,C42I)W AW
a me
ro" S�tfF4lrlG,C`�t rRA,
t K
y, A
Y`fY,
c7; { 4 '1" '.f 'a#° }r �'t Araidyv. e •z "S j�°i+rF '` " ',N + ^'"d
Ot
75,cg
u
t
i �, �. ye ♦ n yzr + �m i .�'S.
s+ '�• � 5 � a�. _�� �f �`�p'�S�s� '¢. �. � k ' �h t d sem;.. Su td"
�'�x
f aahyOrt �iC.lrctr'c/J
0
1 -
r
� aanr+frto+x b. y......srsetric
�. .... 4z
anti of Uubru/
;D1 V/SSION
2 NO- 0~60 aN,O t?SQvi-qbtY
,^�4l:2tN 'YeftKR�
Nei=
r I
f4'
Doo 44-T"4 .
tieA
R�
� k Ik 4 F 'N. � i �'•
^,kqrl
^!
1.
x
05, L
ik� �� t`R r x' �2xa •} "" �d d;;
.'. ` � v • yk v .� at�A 4 4 "4 "�+ b w ht �nx F w � � -
1 'C'P`° C .ti,�Y+'; y � ,� � � �;X,• � °JS&�. h�;'�.fi '4^. .w .� .5'v v �
".,� vw'T 'I"I"
aijf:�sS
I�
h
� V t V \• PrEtlfls/rt � .
I
• p I
.10
77 zy
t
n � j� mob%nso.er Rd
r
i
�W 1
Wad�
k 6
`1
1
� � Y
r j 1
x :
� LodKcN� C�S�trFd 7fi.#�NNf x" ',
mall. ceosp
C p" m
AL r Y� •\, )'.l. •.
Vf J4 7r ,Y r°w�
\ >
'• 4
d
u Z�
\t.
? w t
a
1
1
FO4c
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �Gy
Richard G.Ward, Chairman H Town Hall,53095 Main Road
George Ritchie Latham,Jr. r ^ P. O. Box 1179
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. 411;,� Southold, New York 11971
Mark S.McDonald ��0� Fax(516)7653136
Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
February 7, 1995
Richard Lark, Esq.
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Minor subdivision for Kathleen Varano
SCTM# 1000-86-7-4
Dear Mr. Lark:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board
at a meeting held on Monday, February 6, 1995:
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board override the
January 5, 1995 Suffolk County Planning Commission Report.
Relief from the Zoning Ordinance was granted by the Zoning Board of
Appeals in a determination rendered on November 2, 1994. The pro-
posed subdivision is In conformance with the relief granted.
The Conditions of the December 12, 1994 conditional sketch approval must
be presented in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions in proper legal
form. The following paragraph must be included In the Declaration also.
These Covenants and Restrictions can be modified only at the request
of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority
plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a
public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice
of such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall
not be required.
Page 2
Minor subdivision for Kathleen Varano
February 7, 1995
A copy of the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be
submitted for review by the Planning Board and the Town Attorney. Once
approved, the document must be filed in the office of the County Clerk.
The final maps must include a notation that a Declaration of Covenants and
Restrictions has been filed and the Liber and Page number of the recorded
document.
Please contact this office If you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
enc.
cc: Suffolk County Planning Commission
Frank Cichanowicz
"COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
Y
ROBERT J. GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING STEPHEN M. JONES, A.I.C_P.
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
January 5, 1995
Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman
Town of Southold Planning Board
Main Road
Southold,NY 11971
Re: Minor Subdivision- Kathleen Varano
Southerly side of Indian Neck Road, 1167.41 feet easterly
from Robinson Road, Peconic in the Town of Southold.
Dear Mr. Ward:
The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on January 4, 1995,
reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision- Kathleen Varano"
referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24,Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code.
The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application.
Very truly yours,
Stephen M. Jones
Director
�ofr Planning
by
Robert Rickert, Senior Planner
Subdivision Review Section �►
RR:mb � @ R 0dR
File: S-SD-94-14 ;�►,� p I
Attachment v
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING F.OdItD
.220 RA6RO DRIVE ■ P.O. Box 6100 ■ HAUPPAUGE LONG ISLAND. NY 11766-0099 ■ (616)673.7162 .
/AX (616)660106
File No. S-SD-94-14
Resolution No. ZSR-95-07 of Suffolk County Planning Commission
f Pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative
Code, a referred was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on
December 16, 1994, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Minor Subdivision-
Kathleen Varano" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting
premises located on the southerly side of Indian Neck Road, 1167.41 feet easterly
from Robinson Road, Peconic, in the Town of Southold, and,
WHEREAS, said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its
meeting on January 4, 1995, and
WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to disapprove said referral, Be It Therefore
RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the
report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Be It Further
RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is disapproved for the following reasons:
Creation of a subdivision with substandard lots, that is, lots whose areas are less than
the minimum required by the zoning classification of the property, constitutes an
overintensification of land use in an area that is already densely developed. Creation
of this subdivision could result in the establishment of a precedence for the
subdivision of other similar parcels in the area, overloading the road system,
increasing on-street parking, and the overburdening of other public facilities.
Motion by: Commissioner Isles Seconded by: Commissioner Vahradian
i
Commission Vote: 11 Present - Yeas 8
Nays 2 Commissioners Eversoll and Van Schoor
Abstentions 1 Commissioner Dodge
Dated January 4, 1995
Hauppauge,New York
Suffolk County Planning Commission
SJ�1 ,
•COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
(a
ROBERT J. GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING STEPHEN M. JONES, A.I.C.P.
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
January 5, 1995
Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman
Town of Southold Planning Board
Main Road
Southold,NY 11971
Re: Minor Subdivision-Kathleen Varano
Southerly side of Indian Neck Road, 1167.41 feet easterly
from Robinson Road, Peconic in the Town of Southold.
Dear Mr. Ward:
The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on January 4, 1995,
reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision-Kathleen Varano"
referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code.
The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application.
Very truly yours,
Stephen M. Jones
Director of Planning
�
b
Robert Riekert, Senior Planner
Subdivision Review Section
RR:mb
EPLANNiNLG
File: S-SD-94-14
Attachment
WN
ARD
220 RABRO DRIVE ■ P.O. BOX 6100 ■ HAUPPAUGE. LONG ISLAND. NY 11788-0099 ■ (516) 853-5192
FAX (516) 853.4044
File No. S-SD-94-14
Resolution No. ZSR-95-07 of Suffolk County Planning Commission
Pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative
Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on
December 16, 1994, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Minor Subdivision-
Kathleen Varano" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting
premises located on the southerly side of Indian Neck Road, 1167.41 feet easterly
from Robinson Road, Peconic, in the Town of Southold, and,
WHEREAS, said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its
meeting on January 4, 1995, and
WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to disapprove said referral, Be It Therefore
RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the
report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Be It Further
RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is disapproved for the following reasons:
Creation of a subdivision with substandard lots,that is, lots whose areas are less than
the minimum required by the zoning classification of the property, constitutes an
overintensification of land use in an area that is already densely developed. Creation
of this subdivision could result in the establishment of a precedence for the
subdivision of other similar parcels in the area, overloading the road system,
increasing on-street parking, and the overburdening of other public facilities.
Motion by: Commissioner Isles Seconded by: Commissioner Vahradian
Commission Vote: 11 Present - Yeas 8
Nays 2 Commissioners Eversoll and Van Schoor
Abstentions 1 Commissioner Dodge
Dated January 4, 1995
Hauppauge,New York
Suffolk County Planning Commission
ypuTH 04D • ^�
�Rf DISSR�`�
SOUTHOLD FIRE DISTRICT
P.O. BOX 908, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971
January 13, 1995
Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman
Town of Southold
Planning Board Office
PO Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Kathleen Varano, 1000-86-07-04
Dear Mr. Ward:
This is to notify you that the Southold Fire District
Board of Commissioners has reviewed the survey for the above
mentioned parcel . At this time, there is no need for fire-
wells on this property. The Board of Commissioners feel that
there is adequate fire protection for that area.
This decision is valid for one year.
Sincerely,
Cynthia Caprise
Secretary
E[� � d [� fel
17 1996
HOLD TOWNNNING BOARD
7 ,
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Richard G.Ward, ChairmanF Z Town Hall,53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
George Ritchie Latham,Jr.
Bennett Orlowski,Jr.
Southold, New York 11971
Mark S.McDonald '/ �J Fax(516)765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards « _ Telephone(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
l eCembe2l3. 1994
Suffolk County Planning Commission
H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor
Veteran's Memorial Highway
Hauppauge, NY 11788
Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner
Subdivision Review Division
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town
Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County
Planning Commission:
Map of kC. weev\ kw�VNO Hamlet/Locality-l- «nrc- I So 4l�lc�Ta n
S.C.D.P.W. Topo No.: Zoning F-80
S.C. Tax Map No.: 1000 - g6 - 7 4
vl-Ar&-Ivl4 r
Major Sub. Minor Sub. Site Plan Cluster Lot Line Change
MATERIAL SUBMITTED:
Preliminary Plat (3 copies) Road Profiles (1) Drainage Plans (1)
Topographical Map (1) Site Plan (1) Grading Plan (1)
Other materials (specify and give number of copies)
1 C I1119I44T12(nny1;^r, '.r�� tCs��,rkiwl 1r
(1� e.Py njz��r4 cy�;storN o{ Zo nr
Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet
Page 2
Southold Town Planning Board Referral
Referral Criteria:
SEQRA STATUS:
1. The project is an ( ) Unlisted Action
(X) Type I Action
( ) Type II Action
2. A (X) Negative Declaration
( ) Positive Declaration
( ) Determination of Non-significance
has been adopted by the Planning Board.
3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. ( ) Yes
(�) No
Comments:
We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral ( ) Yes
( ) No
Referral received 1994 by the Suffolk County Planning
Commission and assigned File No.
Sincerely,
Richard G. Wardf
Chairman
cc: Frank Cichanowicz
rev. 6194
September 19 , 1990
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Minor Subdivision for
Kathleen B. Varano
Gentlemen:
The following statements are offered for your consideration
in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its
referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission:
(1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential
building is proposed.
(2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the
grades of the existing roads.
(3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing
structures are proposed.
Yours truly,
athlee B. Varano
Salarano
Mark Varano
Ct��lr-
Kenneth r. Varano
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS a'
1 ,
Richard G. Ward, ChairmanTown Hall,53095 Main Road
George Ritchie Latham,Jr. P. O. Box 1179
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. -;;. Southold, New York 11971
Mark S. McDonald �` �7! 1 ,'_, Fax(516)765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
December 13, 1994
Richard Lark, Esq.
P.O:Box 973
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for
Kathleen Varano
SCTM# 1000-86-7-4
Dear Mr. Lark:
The following resolution was adopted by the Soutnoid Town Planning Board
at a meeting held on Monday, December 12, 1994:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch
approval on the map dated November 22, 1994, with the following
conditions:
1. The three proposed lots shall be designed with one common curb cult.
This shall be so noted on the final map.
2. The location of the common driveway shall be shown on the final wrap.
The terms for maintaining the common driveway shall be included in a
Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions.
3. Clearing and cutting in the areas outside of the building envelopes shall
be limited to that necessary for proper maintenance and removal of
diseased, decayed or dead material and obnoxious plant species,
Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary
for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as
much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible. These terms
shall be included in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions.
Page 2
Minor subdivision for Kathleen Varano
December 13, 1994
Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six
months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is
requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board.
Five (5) paper prints and two (2) mylars of the final map, containing a
current stamp of Health Department approval, must be submitted before a
final public hearing will be set,
The sketch plans will be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission
for review. You will be notified upon receipt of the Commissions report.
The Planning Board may require covenants and restrictions, in addition to
the ones mentioned above, upon review of the report and review of the
final maps. You will be notified if any additional covenants and restrictions
are required.
The sketch plans have also been referred to the Southold Fire Department
for their recommendations as to whether a firewell is necessary for fire
protection.
The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that it is
inadequate in size for a reservation of land for park and playground use.
Therefore, a cash payment In lieu of land reservation will be required as per
Section A106-38 (E) of the Town Code. The amount to be deposited with
the Town Board shall be $2000.00 (two thousand dollars per vacant lot in
the subdivision.) Payment is required prior to any final endorsement of the
subdivision.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely, q
I 1�J6�f/
y„5
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
J
Richard G.Ward, Chairman = Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
George Ritchie Latham,Jr. j �' ' P. O. Box 1179
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971
Mark S.McDonald _ Fax (516)765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
November 15, 1994
Richard Lark, Esq.
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for
Kathleen Varano
SCTM# 1000-86-7-4
Dear Mr. Lark:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board
at a meeting held on Monday, November 14, 1994:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the
State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency, and as lead
agency, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative
Declaration.
Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records.
Sincerely, /16�vl
Richard G. Ward /ItirJ
Chairman
enc.
i •
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Richard G.Ward, ChairmanTown Hall,53095 Main Road
George Ritchie Latham,Jr. � ,T P. O. Box 1179
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. �!•, Rv./.�,;�' Southold, New York 11971
Mark S.McDonald �_ '' a �'-J Fax(516)765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards ? _ Telephone(516)765.1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
State Environmental Quality Review
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice of Determination Non-Significant
November 14, 1994
i
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations
pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the
Environmental Law.
i
The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the
proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the
environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Name of Action: Proposed minor subdivision for
Kathleen Varano
SCTM#: 1000-86-7-4
Location: South side of Indian Neck Lane in Peconic
SEAR Status: Type I ( X ) located within 500 feet of CEA
Unlisted ( )
Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( )
No ( X )
Description of Action:
Minor subdivision of 5.425 acre parcel into 3 lots.
I
i
i
,I
f • .tree..:. . .a
•
Page 2
SEQRA Negative Declaration - Kathleen Varano
November 14, 1994
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed,
and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the
environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented
as planned.
There has been correspondence received from the Department of Health
Services Office of Ecology. The land use measures listed in the November
9, 1994 correspondence have been taken into consideration by the lead
agency.
There has not been any correspondence from the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time.
Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections
from that agency.
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Melissa Spiro
Address: Planning Board
Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938
cc: Langdon Marsh, DEC Albany
Suffolk County Dept. of Health
Suffolk County Planning Commission
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals
Southold Town Board of Trustees
Applicant
Subi •
�, MS
��SOFFOLKCOG
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Southold Town Hall
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman H, _ 53095 Main Road
Serge Doyen, Jr. P.O. Box 1179
11
James Robert inn r y'�Oj �a�! Southold, New York 11971
Villa
Fax (516) 765-1823
Richard C. Wilton Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
November 15, 1994
Richard F. Lark, Esq.
Main Road, P. Box 973
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Appl. No. 4281 - Kathleen Varano and Others (Variances)
Dear Mr. Lark:
Please find enclosed a copy of the determination rendered by the
Board of Appeals at our November 2, 1994 Regular Meeting and filed
"today with the Town Clerk's Office concerning the above application.
A copy of this determination has also been furnished to the Southold
Town Building Department and Planning Board offices for their
updates. Also, due to the proximity of this project within 500 feet
of a waterway, State or County Road, we have transmitted copies of
the variance file to the Suffolk County Department of Planning for
their determination as required under the County's Administrative
Code. Once that agency has finalized its review and forwarded its
comments to our office, we will transmit a copy of the same to you.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
Very truly yours,
Linda Kowalski
Enclosure
Copies of Decision to:
Building Department
._ 'Planning Board V
Suffolk County Department of Planning O L5 ly 15 i1 )11 �'
SOOT ickl)10','A
PLn�'�11;JGPCID _..,�
�OS�ff0(KCOG
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Southold Town Hall
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman ,= 53095 Main Road
Serge Doyen, Jr. �p a P.O. Box 1179
James Dinizio, Jr. y aO� Southold, New York 11971
Robert A. Villa l lc Fax (516) 765-1823
Richard C. Wilton Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
ACTION OF THE BOARD
DATE OF ACTION: November 22 1994 APPL. #4281.
APPLICANT: KATHLEEN VARANO and Others (Richard F. Lark, Esq.)
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 6600 Indian Neck Road
Peconic, NY.
COUNTY TAX MAP DISTRICT 1000 SECTION 86 BLOCK 7 LOT 4.
BASIS OF APPEAL: Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector
dated 9/27/94. "Areas of accessways to rear lots cannot be included in
lot areas and proposed lots will have insufficient lot area and building
envelopes/setbacks which will not comply with required setbacks for this
tract.
P OVISIONS APPEALED FROM: Article XXIII, Section 100-235B, Article
III, Section 100-32 (Bulk Schedule)
RELIEF REQUESTED: Proposed Lot 1: 75,300 sq. ft. lot area and front
yards at 60 ft. from Indian Neck Road and 50 feet from private
right-of-way, 50 ft. rear yard, 20 ft. side yard; Lot 2: 80,000 sq ft.
lot area inclusive of ROW strip, setbacks at 50 front and 50 ft. rear;
sides 20 and, 25; Lot 3: 81,000 sq. ft. lot area inclusive of ROW strip,
all as shown 'on survey amended August 31, 1994 prepared by Roderick
VanTuyl, P.C.
MOTION MADE BY: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman-Member
SECONDED BY: James Dinizio, Jr. , Member
ACTION/RESOLUTION ADOPTED: Granted relief requested as noted
above. Same condition as former ZBA resolution still applies:
"Lot #3 shall be restricted to on use only with no additional
sleeping or living quarters in any accessory buildings (except as may be
allowed by legislative action in amending the current zoning code)."
REASONS/FINDINGS: Property received former variance approval under
Appeal No. 3330 on May 2, 1985 and former Planning Board sketch approval
for similar lot size(s) with different configuration. Character, shape, .
narrow width, and topography of this 5.424 acre-parcel lend to unusual
circumstances and need for variances. No alternative is available for
lot sizes or alternative access.
VOTE OF THE BOARD: Ayes: Serge J. Doyen, Member
James Dinizio, Jr. , Member
Richard A. Wilton, Member
Gerard P. Gochringer, Chairman-Member
Absent: Robert A. Villa (out-of-state).
This resolution was duly adopted (4-0
lk GERARll F. GOEIiRINGER, CIIAIRMAN
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
A
Richard G.Ward, Chairman n Town Hall,53095 Main Road
George Ritchie Latham,Jr. 18 ) P. O. Box 1179
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. r Southold, New York 11971
! a
Mark S.McDonald . . Fax(516)765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards rn I Telephone(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Ecem�erz 13 1994
Cynthia Caprise, Secretary
Southold Fire District
P.O. Box 908
Southold, NY 11971
Dear Ms. Caprise:
Enclosed please find two (2) surveys for
Nljort S,aA ;U__- S_, LtWfen Ura SCtM*loco - V6- `I-4
Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please
specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed.
Please reply by Jar . 1995. Thank you for your
cooperation.
Sincerely,
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS /
...
Richard G.Ward, Chairman -_
Town Hall,53095 Main Road
� r>3
George Ritchie Latham,Jr. `°:� �; P. O. Box 1179
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971
Mark S. McDonald Fax(516)765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards y Telephone(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
December 13, 1994
Richard Lark, Esq.
P.O.Box 973
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for
Kathleen Varano
SCTM# 1000-86-7-4
Dear Mr. Lark:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board
at a meeting held on Monday, December 12, 1994:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch
approval on the map dated November 22, 1994, with the following
conditions:
1. The three proposed lots shall be designed with one common curb cut.
This shall be so noted on the final map.
2. The location of the common driveway shall be shown on the final map.
The terms for maintaining the common driveway shall be included in a
Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions.
3. Clearing and cutting In the areas outside of the building envelopes shall
be limited to that necessary for proper maintenance and removal of
diseased, decayed or dead material and obnoxious plant species,
Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary
for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as
much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible. These terms
shall be included in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions.
Page 2
Minor subdivision for Kathleen Varano
December 13, 1994
Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six
months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is
requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board.
Five (5) paper prints and two (2) mylars of the final map, containing a
current stamp of Health Department approval, must be submitted before a
final public hearing will be set,
The sketch plans will be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission
for review. You will be notified upon receipt of the Commissions report.
The Planning Board may require covenants and restrictions, in addition to
the ones mentioned above, upon review of the report and review of the
final maps. You will be notified if any additional covenants and restrictions
are required.
The sketch plans have also been referred to the Southold Fire Department
for their recommendations as to whether a firewell is necessary for fire
protection.
The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that it is
inadequate in size for a reservation of land for park and playground use.
Therefore, a cash payment in lieu of land reservation will be required as per
Section A106-38 (E) of the Town Code, The amount to be deposited with
the Town Board shall be $2000.00 (two thousand dollars per vacant lot in
the subdivision.) Payment is required prior to any final endorsement of the
subdivision.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
(UlwV4 10
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
• • SOS%
_.... D NEW::NEGATIVE DECLARATIONi .:i:: :'::':. :.:' ': :::::: '. :: :::: . .:::.:'.::i:: ':.::<.' ' ...':.l2/06/94:.',-,.* 16:57
ILE NUMBER N1473800-00912 .; Town of SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK County
LEAD AGENCY 473800 Town of SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK County
FFICE or BOARD: :Planning Board
CLASS T ,Unlisted`
ITLE :Kathleen Varano Type 1
DESCRIPTION :Minor subdivision of 5.425ac into 3 lots located S/S Indian Neck
Lane-Peconic
LATE RECEIVED: ..
Negative Declaration 11/18/94
STATUS: N`
Normal Void
Conditioned
::Rescinded
Current Record '
11
IMPORTANT >> File Number:
N1-473800-00912 '
00
Use the above number in all
correspondence about this action!
To the Lead Agency:
The above information confirms that filings on the described
Negative Declaration were officially received by, and entered in the
SEQR Repository on the date(s) shown in the box headed DATE RECEIVED
above. The date and time in the second line show when this
document was printed. Please check the information above carefully.
For corrections or questions contact Charles Lockrow, (518) 457-2224,
or write to:
SEQR Repository
NYSDEC Division of Regulatory Affairs
50 Wolf Road, Room 514
Albany, NY 12233
Town of SOUTHOLD
Planning Board 2 l)
53095 Main Road-P.O. Box 1179 DEC
Southold, NY 11971
THOLD OWN
NTNG BOARD
.Sut3F
RICHARD F. LARK
ATTORNEY AT LAW J
MAIN ROAD- P. O. BOX 973
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935
TELEPHONE 516 734-6807
RICHARD F. LARK
MARY LOU FOLTS November 28 , 1994
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ATT: Melissa Spiro
RE: Minor Subdivision for Kathleen Varano
SCTM #1000-086 .00-07.00-004 . 000
Dear Ms. Spiro:
Pursuant to your request I am enclosing eight prints of
the Minor Subdivision Map of Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. , last
amended Nov. 22, 1994 . It is my understanding you will place
this matter on the December 12 , 1994 agenda for sketch map
approval .
;ytr4ly
ursRFL/bd
Enclosures
I
DEC 51994
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
M5
FOLIC
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Southold Town Hall
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman co
C4 53095 Main Road
Serge Doyen, Jr. P.O. Box 1179
James Dinizio, Jr. Southold, New York 11971
Robert A. Villa Fax (516) 765-1823
Richard C. Wilton Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
November 15, 1994
Richard F. Lark, Esq.
Main Road, P. Box 973
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Appl. No. 4281 - Kathleen Varano and Others (Variances)
Dear Mr. Lark:
Please find enclosed a copy of the determination rendered by the
Board of Appeals at our November 2, 1994 Regular Meeting and filed
today with the Town Clerk's Office concerning the above application.
A copy of this determination has also been furnished to the Southold
Town Building Department and Plannin Board offices for their
updates. Also, due to the proximity of this project within 500 feet
of a waterway, State or County Road, we have transmitted copies of
the variance file to the Suffolk County Department of Planning for
their determination as required under the County's Admini trative
Code. Once that agency has finalized its review and forwarded its
comments to our office, we will transmit a copy of the same to you.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
Very truly yours,
Linda Kowalski
Enclosure
Copies of Decision to:
Building Department
'�Planning Board v-'-
Suffolk County Department of Planning N 0 W R
WV I &1994
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS �� y
Southold Town Hall
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman co ,? 53095 Main Road
Serge Doyen, Jr. W_ P.O. Box 1179
James Robert'A. Villar y?10j ,f` �aO� SoFaxold, New Yok( 5 6) 765-r182371
Richard C. Wilton T Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
ACTION OF THE BOARD
DATE OF ACTION: November 22 1994 APPL. #4281.
APPLICANT: KATHLEEN VARANO and Others (Richard F. Lark, Esq.)
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 6600 Indian Neck Road
Peconic, NY.
COUNTY TAX MAP DISTRICT 1000 SECTION 86 BLOCK 7 LOT 4.
BASIS OF APPEAL: Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector
dated 9/27/94. "Areas of accessways to rear lots cannot be included in
lot areas and . . .proposed lots will have insufficient lot area and building
envelopes/setbacks which will not comply with required setbacks for this
district.
PROVISIONS APPEALED FROM: Article XXIII, Section 100-235B, Article
III, Section 100-32 (Bulk Schedule)
RELIEF REQUESTED: Proposed Lot 1: 75,300 sq. ft. lot area and front
yards at 60 ft. from Indian Neck Road and 50 feet from private
right-of-way, 50 ft. rear yard, 20 ft. side yard; Lot 2: 80,000 sq ft.
lot area inclusive of ROW strip, setbacks at 50 front and 50 ft. rear;
sides 20 and- 25; Lot 3: 81,000 sq. ft. lot area inclusive of ROW strip,
all as shown on survey amended August 31, 1994 prepared by Roderick
VanTuyl, P.C.
MOTION MADE BY: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman-Member
SECONDED BY: James Dinizio, Jr., Member
ACTION/RESOLUTION ADOPTED: Granted relief requested as noted
above. Same condition as former ZBA resolution still applies:
"Lot #3 shall be restricted to one-family use only with no additional
sleeping or living quarters in any accessory buildings (except as may be
allowed by legislative action in amending the current zoning code)."
REASONS/FINDINGS: Property received former variance approval under
Appeal No. 3330 on May 2, 1985 and former Planning Board sketch approval
for similar lot size(s) with different configuration. Character, shape,
narrow width, and topography of this 5.424 acre-parcel lend to unusual
circumstances and need for variances. No alternative is available for
lot sizes or alternative access.
VOTE OF THE BOARD: Ayes: Serge J. Doyen, Member
James Dinizio, Jr., Member
Richard A. Wilton, Member
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman-Member
Absent: Robert A. Villa (out-of-state).
This resolution was duly adopted (4-0
lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHA�VIIR N—
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ,z.
{
Richard G.Ward, Chairmanr i Town Hall,53095 Main Road
George Ritchie Latham,Jr. s P. O. Box 1179
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. -;'.' r Southold, New York 11971
Mark S. McDonald Fax(516)765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards x Telephone(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOI`D
November 15, 1994
Richard Lark, Esq.
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for
Kathleen Varano
SCTM# 1000-86-7-4
Dear Mr. Lark:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board
at a meeting held on Monday, November 14, 1994:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the
State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency, and as lead
agency, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative
Declaration.
_ - Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records.
Sincerely,
Richard G. Wardf
Chairman
`' enc.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS #4.$ r =i
Richard G.Ward, Chairman y ,a }}� Town Hall,53095 Main Road
George Ritchie Latham,Jr. LJ
P. O. Box 1179
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971
a , s
Mark S.McDonald ?r -, Fax(516)765136
Kenneth L Edwards a ;; Telephone(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
State Environmental Quality Review
NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
Notice of Determination Non-Significant
November 14, 1994
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations
pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the
Environmental Law.
The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the
proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the
environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Name of Action: Proposed minor subdivision for
Kathleen Varano
SCTM#: 1000-86-7-4
Location: South side of Indian Neck Lane in Peconic
SEQR Status: Type I ( X ) located within 500 feet of CEA
Unlisted ( )
Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( )
No ( X )
Description of Action:
Minor subdivision of 5.425 acre parcel into 3 lots.
Page 2
SEQRA Negative Declaration - Kathleen Varano
November 14, 1994
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed,
and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the
environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented
as planned.
There has been correspondence received from the Department of Health
Services Office of Ecology. The land use measures listed in the November
9, 1994 correspondence have been taken into consideration by the lead
agency.
There has not been any correspondence from the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time.
Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections
from that agency.
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Melissa Spiro
Address: Planning Board
Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938
cc: Langdon Marsh, DEC Albany
Suffolk County Dept. of Health
Suffolk County Planning Commission
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals
Southold Town Board of Trustees
Applicant
CRAMER, V SOCIATES
ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS
November 14, 1994
Mr.Richard Ward,Chairman
Southold planning Board
Town Hall,53095-Main Road
P.O.Box 1179
Southold,NY 11971 t
Re: Review of EAFr,-, )!'
Katherine Varano NOV 2 8 1994
SCTM No. 1000-86-7-
SOUTNOLD TOWN
Dear Mr.Ward: PLANNING BOARD
As per the your request,we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced
project in accordance with your request. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows:
1. Review Part I LEAF
The parcel has been field inspected by CVA,and the LEAF has been reviewed and
amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached
2 Prepare Part H LEAF
The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional
information concerning our findings is included below.
3. Envkwwwaal and PlwvdM Considerations
The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area
have been consulted. consists of 5.425 acres of laud and is located in the Hamlet
of Peoonic. The site lies south of Indian Neck Road and has 249.10 feet of frontage on
Indian Neck Road,and 197 feet of frontage on Hog Neck Bay, and a total property depth
along the eastern property line of 1,149 feet.
Theroposed action involves division of the land into three(3)lots. The site is zoned R-80
residence requiring lot sizes of 80,000 square feet. The minimum lot size is 75,300 with two
additional lots of 80,000 square feet and 81,000 square feet. Therefore,Lot 1 of the
subdivision is 4,700 square feet less than that required by zoning. Lot 1 has 215 feet of
frontage directly on Indian Neck Road—Lots 2 and 3 are configured as flag lots with 15
feet of frontage each Therefore,access for Lot will be directly from Indian Neck Road,
and a common driveway will be utilized for Lots 2 and 3. Lot 3 currentlycontains a
dwellingand a ggaarrage cad has bulkheaded frontage on Hog Neck Bay. site sanitary
disposalin oon£ermaaoe with Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and on site
water supply is proposed via wells in conformance with Article 4 of the SCSC
The property has been inspected,and various environmental resources have been
consulted to determine the environmental characteristics of the site. The site has good
leaching soils ioc]udin;pCarver and Plymouth sand and Riverhead Sandy loam
Subsoils are charadenze�on a test hole which found 4 inches of sandy loam and 14
feet of coarse sand. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 14'4"within Lot 1,and the
elevations are such on all three lots that depth to groundwater is adequate for sanitary
system installation. The site is relatively flat with a point of laver elevation along the
Pale t ar2
54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455
KatbwIne Vane
[.00a EAF PAview
frontage of the site on Indian Neck Road,from which the site rises toward the south,and
then decreases in elevation south of the existing house and toward the Bay. There are no
msmma-
The
wetlands located on the sub'ect roperty,however,the site has sandy beach in
etween the bulkhead andiigh Water. The majority of the site is dry oak
cleared grassy areas surrounding the e�osting swelling. Grassed area:do not
be fertilized at present There is a long dirt away tt►at provides access to the
ome The site supports species of avian wildlife and email mammalstypical of a
rest area aced there is no evidence of site use or occupation by rare,threatened or
ed species.
The North Fork is located in Groundwater Management Zone IV but the site is not within
the water budget area. In addition,the area is generally outside of parts of the Town
ficther south that site has experienced some akhcc arb contamination e adversely impacted by due to pted otato crops however,
on the North the area west of e
Fork Water Supply Plan. The elevation of groundwater beneath the site is less than 2 feet
and the topographic elevation is in the range of 15-20 feet,indicating a depth to
groundwater averaging 13 to 18 feet which is consistent with the test hole. Land use is the
area consists of homes Er the bay,with large area of vacant private land holdings
along the road,similar inc�and use to the proposed project site. The area
generally surrounding the site is zoned"R-80". Indian Neck Road is a local road that only
serves residences on the south and west sides of Richmond Creek. The road dead ends
further east of the subject site.
The proposed land use will result in 2 additional homes on a 5.425 acre site. Although the
use is not mi exact conformance with R-80 zoning,the division of the land is notto have a
significant adverse impact upon the environmental quality of the site The Board d consider
the precedent setting nature of the exeation of a lot of less than 80,000 square feet,particularly in
view of the similar configuration of surrounding lands,which may iia brought to the Board for
subdivision in the future. In addition,it is recommended that restrictions 6e ' on each
individual lot to ensure that a portion of the lots remain in wooded veggeetatioa�the
continuity of the dry oak forest oa the south side of Indian Neck Roadm this area Ile house on
Lot 1 couldy be set back 100 feet into the lot leaving a wooded setback with the exception of
a driveway cut. 't7»s would preside privary for the home,and maintain the existing visual quality
of Indian Neck Road Lot 2 is of ample size to allow a minimum 100 foot vegetated area to be
Preserved as well. These measures could be incorporated into decision by covenant or restriction
in subdivision approval.
If the Board is is agreement with this review,the proposed action does not appear to
warrant the preparation of an environmental impact statement,therefore a negative dec]aration
would be approppriate. If you have any questions or wish any farther input with regard to this
matter,please do not hesitate to call.
Very
C,elfules L Voorhis,CSP,ACCP
enc:Long FAF Part I
CRAMER, V OCIATES �`2e(2
ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS
14 16-2 (218711-7c
617.21 1:
Appendix A S
@1
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORA I
SOUTHOLDTOWN
PLANNING BOARD `
Purpose: The full [AF is designed to help applicants and agencies delennine, in -In orderly manner, whether a project
or action may he significant. T he question of whelher an action may he significant is not ahvays easy In answer. Frequent-
ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unnreasureable. It is also mndenska,d II1a1 (hose who determine
significance may have little or no fomnal knowledge of lhr' environment or may be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to(it a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts ll,at may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identities whether an impact can lie mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then fart 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
Impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for Il,is pmjecl: It fart I N fart 2 ❑fart 3
CUpon review of the informalion recorded on This FAF (farts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate). and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
L9 A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a 'leg-'live declaration will be prepared.
❑ D. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not he a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaralion will be prepared.'
❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Cluster Subdivision for Kathleen Varano
Name of Action
10cIVAI fl F 041W V/A!
,� Name of Lead Agency
�if3%ay.. il/ LA
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer inf call Agency Fdlle n Responsible Officer
lncvi��
( Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature(71 1'rrl,arer(If different from responsible
ofofficficer)
September 2 1999
Date
1
PART 1—PROJECT INFORMAliON
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered
as part of the application for approval and may he subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies, research or investigation. if information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
Cluster Subdivision for Kathleen Varano
LOCATION OF ACTION(include Street Address,Municipality and County)
Indian Neck Zaad,—Per-onic, New York
NAME OF APPLICANTSPONSOn XNMNMTELEPHONE
Kathleen Varano (718 ) 833-2110
ADDRESS
1024 79th Street
CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE
Brooklyn NY 11228
NAME OF OWNER(It ditterenl) Kathleen Varano, Kenneth J. Varano, BUSINESS TELEPHONE
Mark Varano and Sal R. Varano
ADDRESS
CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Subdivision of 5. 425 acres of .land on the southerly side of Indian
Neck Road, Peconic, New York (Suffolk County 'Pax Map No. District ,
1000, Section 086 . 00, Block 07 . 00, Lot 004 .000)
Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and Undeveloped areas. t
1. Present land use: OUrban Olndustrial OCommercial OResidential(suburban) ®Rural (non-farm)
OForest OAgriculture OOther
2. Total acreage of project area: 5, 429 acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or 8rushland (Non-agricultural) 0 acres 0 acres
Forested 0 _ acres 0
acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 acres _ 0 0 acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) n acres Oacres
Water Surface Area 0 acres 0
acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0
acres 0 acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 acres 0 acres
Other (indicate type) Exist inq residence and 5 . 425 acres 5. 425
vacant land acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? ._ -. top_ soil slnd_Qaar a sand cTrayel
a. Soil drainage: MWell drained _100 °6 of cite OModerately well drained °' to
❑Poorly drained % of site 4P.4 it, 'e.
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil arc classified within soil group 1 throng 1 d of the NY
land Classification System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? OYes ®No
a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A —600*(in feet)
2
Y1�rs.aw-:if�Pw}Ke:i,IwvGv..w.wiuuawwv>sssv.:..aw•YM.wrYif'�I�e�ii6l�l` - IeYY'�ib!•r
5. Approximate percentage of proOproject site with slopes: IAO-IIIm6 _ ",6 L1111-ISmo mo
•
171I50.f, or greater °6
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the Stale or the National
Registers of Historic Places? Dyes ONo
� '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the RegisterofNational Natural Landmarks?j�,�71Yes GlNo
8. What is the depth of the water table? 18 (in feet) /1' /T /'dryZ M31-MiC- ( �
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Wes Mo
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Oyes OINo
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
Dyes Mo According to 1^VA 4a1-,s`Aftr_noAr
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
Dyes ®No Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
Oyes ®No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
Dyes ®No
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N/A
16. Lakes, pontis, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: No611�EzxSity pE"COt//C �j}y/
a. Name N/A b. Size (In acres) N/A
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Myes f)No
( a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Lyes l_lNo
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Mrs IxINo
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agricullure and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? Oyes IANo
19. Is the site located in or substantial]�j ontiguous to a Critic. uonmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? IYYes KlNo
` \
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid orr, ., r ous wastes? Dyes ®No
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 5 . 425 acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: 5. 425 acres initially; 5. 425 acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres.
d. Length of ll,roject, in miles: N/A (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A 0s;
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A ; proposed N/A
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 3 (upon completion of project)?
It. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially 1 0 0 0
C Ultimately 3 0 0 0
I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 26 height; 30 width; 60 length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 249.10 ft.
3
r 2.'How much natural rnaterialwrock, earth, etc.) will be removed frotol a site? 0 tons/cubic yards
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Yes ONO GIN/A AhtFAIh6VVZV4:5)P
a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site bem reclaimed? N/A 7Df�.S02
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes ®No r
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ONO AM-
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 77ore'OF &SCt
acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
❑Yes K1No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 0 months, (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased: N/A
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition).
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year.
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ONO
8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes MNo �/ 1
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 0 ; after project is complete 0
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 G/M/7150 MNL 4WNSMAcp4o Gyres��L-S
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes nNo If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ONO
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount N/A
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N/A
0
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? es L7fNo Type N A
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease b /7�Y tY1r�A(p
y proposal? ❑Yes (BNo
Explain N/A
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes EXNo
16. Will the project generate solid waste? Xes }ONo
a. If yes, what is the amount per month N/A tonsf7.(rp� ?Vwx
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste�facility be used? X?es ONO
c. If yes, give name N/A ; location N/A .Prr��y
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes CAN N/A
e. If Yes, explain N/A
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes NINO
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? N/A tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? N/A years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes Z]No
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes MNO
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes IDNo
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ®Yes ONO
If yes , indicate type(s)
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 20
"gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day 100 gallons/day. 4/77CAO 600 6PD I E
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes ONO
If Yes, explain N/A
4
��
' 23. Approvals Required: Submittal
Type Dale
City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ®No
CCity, Town, Village Planning Board I1NYes, ONo Minor Subdivision
City, Town-Zoning:Board ❑Yes WNo
City, County Health Department INYes ❑No _Article 6ZA"acF 42frf OA57� %i46
Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ®No
Other Regional Agencies Dyes ONo
State Agencies OYes WNo
Federal Agencies OYes (JNo
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? l@Yes ONo
If Yes, indicate decision required:
flzoning amendment 13zoning variance Ospecial use permit Msubdivision ❑site plan
Onewfrevision of master plan Oresource management plan ❑other
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Low Density Residential (R-80)
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the prest ng?
(Three)one—family dwellings 7OZ?h �[B2[R� en /F tyitLQi�P,GC�
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Low Density Residential (R-80)
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
(Three) one—family dwellings
C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ®Yes ONo
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/ mile radius of proposed action?
Low Density Residential (R-80)
B. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ;i mile? Wyes ONo
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? three
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 75 ,300 sq. ft.
10. Will proposed action require any authorizations) for the formation of sewer or water districts? []Yes ®No
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? &lyes ONo
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? 171Yes ONo
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? []Yes NINo
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? OYes ONo N/A
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
Impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
E. Verification 54 North MILLER PLACE, NEW YORK 1764
I certify that the informatio rovfded above '"ruebest of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name `Y�c(�er c/ �// Date SgI tgnber 2, 1994
Signature ee p btkK e!: tK Ui irtiG �I _
_ l�Grrn .
If the action is in the Coastal Arca, an you are a stale agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
5
" Part 26C,OJECT IMPACTS AND TIIEIWAGNIFUDE
Responsibility of Lead Agency
General Information (Read Carefully)
• In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
reasonable(' The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
• Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (colunm 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
• The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
• The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
• The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
• In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1. .
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This
must be explained in Part 3.
1 2 g !
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By
1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site) Impact Impact Project Change
INNO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Any construction on slopes of 15°0 or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
10%.
• Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑
3 feet. ❑ 11 Yes ❑No
• Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. Cl
• Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within El E]
❑Yes ❑No
El3 feet of existing ground surface. ❑Yes []No
• Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑
than one phase or stage. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑
• Construction in a designated floodway. Cl []Yes ❑No
❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes
❑No
2. Will there be an effect I'- .-,Y unique or unusual land forms found on _
the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)L%NO OYES
• Specific land forms: ❑
❑ OYes ❑No.
6
�y�y" m rc
. - ..• :.+w«W,tagyiWY•w•.,•Nei�k-.::+uai.ak-•'••, __ __ rrlriii�ttOlWrYilYli1
• 1 2 3
IMPACT ON WATER Small, to Potential Can Impact Be
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
(Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
(@NODYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No
• Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
protected stream.
• Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of water? ®NO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water n ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
• Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? L(NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does riot ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
• Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
gallons per minute pumping capacity.
• Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
supply system.
• Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
• Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
day.
• Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ C1 Yes ❑No
existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
• Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical El ❑Yes ❑No
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
• Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
and/or sewer services.
• Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface
water runoff? ®NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No
- =
MN*Ao rr.
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
• Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage ❑ ❑ Yes ONO
• Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ONO
❑ ❑ Dyes ONO
IMPACT ON AIR
'. Will proposed action affect air quality?
Examples that would apply to column 2 InNO OYES
' Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given
hour. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO
Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of
refuse per hour. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO
Emission rate of total contaminants will e:;ceed 5 lbs. per hour or a
❑
Ileal source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. ❑ Dyes ONO r'
Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed �t
to industrial use. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO
Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial '
development within existing industrial areas. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
Other impacts:
❑ ❑ Dyes ONO
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS I
Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? %]NO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO
Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat.
Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO
'ban for agricultural purposes. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
Dther impacts:
❑ ❑ Dyes ONO
IC
Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? ANO OYES
i
Examples that would apply to column 2
'roposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or
)igratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
roposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 'a 1
f mature forest (over 100 acres ❑
years of age) or other locally important ❑ Dyes ONO
•gelation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?
Examples that would apply to column 2 UdNO OYES
'e proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural
id (includes cropland, ha fields, LjfjE03Yes Y pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) ❑No
8
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
agricultural land.
• The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land.
• The proposed action.would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? KINO DYES
(if necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed )and uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ - ❑Yes ONO
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
• Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ EJ Yes ONO
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
Cenjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
• Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? ONO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
• Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑
project site. ❑Yes ONO
• Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for 0 ❑
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. ❑Yes ONO
• Other impacts:* ❑ ❑ ❑YesONO
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13, Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of exisling or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities? -
Examples that would apply to column 2 PONO DYES
C The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opponnnity. 0
• A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ 11 ❑Yes ONO
• Other impacts: ❑ Oyes ONO
❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
9
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 2 '21
14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Examples that would apply to column 2 X10 OYES Impact Impact Project Change.
• Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑
• Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. El ❑Yes ONo
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo
❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply?
Examples that would apply to column 2 TC7N0 DYES
• Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of
any form of energy in the municipality. ❑ ❑ Oyes ONo
• Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family 11 ❑Yes ONO
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑
❑Yes ONo
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result
of the Proposed Action?
Examples that would apply to column 2 (ANO OYES
• Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility. El ❑ ❑Yes ONo
• Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). �.
• Proposed Action will ❑ El ❑Yes ONo
rnoise
ambient noise levels for no se outs detof structuresceeding the local El ❑ ❑Yes ONo
• Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo
' Other impacts: ❑
❑ ❑Yes ONo
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
Examples that would apply to column 2 KINO OYES
Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge or emission.
Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, ❑ 11 Yes ONo
infectious, etc.)
Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural
=;as or other flammable liquids. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo
Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance
`vithin 2.000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ❑ El ONO
waste. /
Other impacts: L
0 0 ❑Yes ONo
10 j
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER `t 2 3
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact Be
18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Pro ect Change
®NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C1 No
Project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
• The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project.
• Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
or areas of historic importance to the community.
• Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
• Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
• Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts? MNO ❑YES
If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
LIf You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impacts) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be
mitigated.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
I. Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
• The probability of the impact occurring
• The duration of the impact
• Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
• Whether the impact can or will be controlled
• The regional consequence of the impact
• Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
• Whether known objections to the project relate In this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
11
,
•COUNTY OF SUFFOLK • mS
ROBERT J. GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HISSERD, M.D., M.P.H.
COMMISSIONER
November 9, 1994
Melissa Spiro
Town of Southold EPLANNIIONLG
Town Hall-53095 Main RoadP.O.Box 1179Southold,New York 11971 RE: Kathleen VaranoNSCTM#: 1000 86 7-4 D
Dear Ms.Spiro:
The Suffolk County Department of Health Services(SCDHS)has received your letter dated October 4, 1994,
concerning the above-referenced application,and has no objection to the Town's designation as lead agency.
This correspondence is intended primarily to expedite the procedural requirements of SEQRA pertaining to the
establishment of lead agency.The comments provided below are,therefore,general in nature,representing several of our
most common concerns regarding Suffolk County projects.The department wishes,however,to reserve its right to
provide more detailed information within the comment period(s)established for this action.
I. Suffolk County Sanitary Code(SCSC)
1. The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems,pursuant to
the authority and requirements of Articles 4,5,6 and 7 of the SCSC. Applications must comply with all relevant
density and construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Applicants should not undertake the
construction of,or connection to,either system without Health Department approval.
2. Where applicable,the department regulates the storage,handling and discharge of restricted toxic and hazardous
materials pursuant to the requirements of Articles 7& 12 of the SCSC.
3. If an application has not yet been submitted to the SCDHS,one should be filed at the earliest date to allow for the
technical review of the proposed action.Project designs submitted to the department should be fully consistent with
any action currently under review through the SEQRA process.
4. Design and flow specifications,information regarding subsurface soil conditions,water supply information,and
complete design details are essential to the review of this project,and are evaluated fully at the time of application
review.Should the town require additional environmental information(such as a DEIS),discussion of the compliance
requirements of the SCDHS should be required.
5. Of particular concern to the department are those areas which because of elevated groundwater conditions,or soils
which are not conducive to the proper functioning of conventional subsurface sanitary sewage disposal systems.Your
agency should be aware that such conditions frequently requite the use of fill or the excavation of subsurface soils to
accommodate subsurface sanitary disposal systems constructed in conformance with the requirements of the SCSC.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUA T
COUNTY CENTER
RIVERHEAD.N.V. 11901-9997
552.2100
Letter to Melissa Spiro •
November 9, 1994
Page 2
6. The department is also significantly concerned with areas where access to potable water may be constrained by
unacceptable groundwater quality and the lack of an available public water supply.All private water supply systems
must be constructed in conformance with requirements of the SCSC.
H. NATURAL RESOURCES:
1. The SCDHS fully supports all efforts to maximize protection of natural resources which may be impacted upon by
construction and development activities.It is the position of the department that the SEQRA review process provides
the greatest opportunity for comprehensive consideration of these resources,and that all practicable planning
measures should be employed to help ensure their protection.
Of particular concent to department is the adequate protection of wetlands,surface waters,natural communities,
contiguous natural habitats,and rare,threatened and endangered species.In addition,efforts to protect sensitive
physical resources such groundwaters,dunes,bluffs,shorelines,natural drainage channels,groundwater recharge
areas,and steep slopes are fully supported and encouraged by the SCDHS.
In general,the department encourages the following land use measures be considered(where appropriate)to actions
being reviewed pursuant to SEQRA.
1.Maximum practicable setbacks from all wetlands,surface waters,duces,and bluffs.
2.Non-disturbance buffers between wetland limits and required structural setbacks.
3.Clustering of subdivision lots to provide for maximum preservation of large contiguous areas of dedicated open
space.
4.Stringent clearing limitations which can reduce potential impacts to wildlife habitats,vegetative communities,and
unconsolidated soils.
5.Maximum practicable confinement of development to areas with slopes of less than 10%.
6.Maximum use of native species for landscaping purposes.
7.Construction of recharge areas,so as to minimize the amount of disturbance and structural modification to the site.
8.Maximum use of land-banked parking on commercial sites.
9.Minimal use of fertilizer-dependant turf and landscaping.
10.Employment of stormwater runoff control measures necessary to maintain runoff on-site.
The department appreciates the opportunity to participate in the SEQRA review of this proposal.Additional
information may be provided prior to the close of the established comment period.Should you have any questions or
require additional information,please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078.
Sincerely,
x--t--Q:y M-44-(
Kimberly Shaw
Sr.Environmental Analyst
Office of Ecology
IvUR/mnf
cc: Vito Micei,P.E.
Stephen Costa,P.E.
i •
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Richard G.Ward, Chairman * Z Town Hall,53095 Main Road
George Ritchie Latham,Jr. ° '°' ' .� P. O.Box 1179
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. %+� ry! Southold, New York 11971
Mark S.McDonaldFax(516)765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards z Telephone(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
FROM: Melissa Spiro, Planner /V
RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision for
Kathleen Varano
SCTM# 1000-86-7-4
DATE: October 27, 1994
In response to your request, please find the following comments
from the Planning Board:
1 . The total area of the property is sufficient to support
three lots (one with the lot area variance previously
granted by the Zoning Board, and two additional lots. )
However, due to the requirement in Section 100-235 of the
Town Code, which requires that the access way for flag lots
be excluded from the lot area, additional lot area
variances are necessary to subdivide the subdivision as
proposed. The Planning Board does not have any objections
to the layout shown on the proposed subdivision map dated
August 31, 1994.
2. The Planning Board classified the action as a Type 1 action
since it is located within 500 feet of a Critical
Environmental Area, and started the Lead Agency
coordination on October 3, 1994. If all is in order, the
Planning Board will proceed with the SEQRA determination
on November 14, 1994.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Richard G.Ward, Chairman ' ) v Town Hail, 53095 Main Road
George Ritchie Latham,Jr. J P. O. Box 1179
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. M r - Southold, New York 11971
Mark S. McDonald S Fax(516)765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
October 11, 1994
_ Cramer, Voorhis & Associates
Environmental and Planning Consultants
54 N. Country Rd.
Miller Place, NY 11764
Re: Review of EAF
Katherine Varano
SCTM# 1000-86-7-4
Dear Messrs. Cramer& Voorhis:
The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment form
for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Also enclosed is a copy
of the map dated August 31, 1994. The Planning Board has not granted sketch
approval on this proposal since lot area variances are necessary. The applicant is
before the Zoning Board of Appeals for the required variances.
The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on October 3, 1994.
The $400.00 review fee has been submitted by the applicant. If all is in order, the
Board will make their SEQRA determination at the November 14, 1994 public meeting.
Please submit your report no later than November 4, 1994 in order for the Board to
review it before the meeting date.
The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover.
Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
�� '// V"
Richard G. Ward I-is
Chairman
encs.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
j ` Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Richard G.Ward, Chairman ; n
r George Ritchie Latham,Jr. P. O. Box 1179Southold, New York 11971
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. ..�
s - Fax
Mark S. McDonald 516 1 ( )765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
¢R 4 , 1999
Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request
Dear Reviewer:
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental
Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR
Part 617 the following:
1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below;
2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and
3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.
Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental
Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response.
Project Name: Ka*Weer. UaccLno SC"rM# Iow-86--7-`I
I
i
Requested Action: �' tus4ec s��cSw 51on o J.4a� acre �rrceQ v> C
3 lo+%. �oc je� So Za+:Nc��r�ct
SEQRA Classification: Type I L ei wlt1, n Scxi Crt;c,& Emu. Ae&.
( ) Unlisted
Contact Person: r ASsh �,Ru
(516) 765-19`38
Page 2
Lead Agency Coordination Request
The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS)
on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in
writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency.
Planning Board Position:
(X) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency
status for this action.
( ) Other (see comments below)
Comments:ye" �� v
T.,
94 ""a 44'� 74 ,L7
rd v aQ 0 A ,A0U111/ sive w A&4t�Q lDs�+i✓( d(PY�1 m iY�u c.�-e�
to contacCtho' ffice for further information.
Please feel
Siryperely
Richard G. Ward I"S
Chairman
cc: *Board of Appeals
Board of Trustees
Southold Town Board
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
F NYSDEC - Stony Brook
'IfNYSDEC - Albany
New YeFk State Department of T-Fansportatiop.
'Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94
i •
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ) �� `
Richard G.Ward, Chairman ( x 4 Town Hall,53095 Main Road
�� - "�
George Ritchie Latham,Jr. J. '._4 a P. O. Box 1179Southold, New York 11971
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. y
Mark S. McDonald �/ t s y Fax(516)765-3136
Kenneth L. EdwardsTelephone(516)765-1938
�zU,J.r
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
October 4, 1994
Richard F. Lark, Esq.
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Minor subdivision for
Kathleen Varano
SCTM# 1000-86-7-4 '
Dear Mr. Lark:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board
at a meeting held on Monday, October 3, 1994:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead
agency coordination process for the minor subdivision of Kathleen Varano,
maps dated August 31, 1994. This action Is classified as a Type 1 action
since it is located within 500 feet of a Critical Environmental Area.
Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely, /�
I,04w /,e K/a4eA
�s
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
cc: Zoning Board of Appeals
41�e=wwww.. _ -. .. rwnv,-- xe...<n•::-..Wn.+�.ii"�ta
Southold Town Board of Appeals -21 - April 16 , 1986 Special Meeting
PENDING DECISION : Appeal No . 3455 :
Application of KATHLEEN VARANO for a Variance to the Zoning
Ordinance , Article X11 , Section 1 1210 ) [11 for a clarification
and/or correction of the interpretation of Building Inspector , of
Condition in Appeal No . 3330 rendered by the Board of Appeals May 2 ,
1985 which allows no sleeping or living quarters in the accessory
garage/apartment structure . Location of Property : 6600 (or 6750 )
Indian Neck Road , Peconic , NY ; County Tax Map Parcel No . 1000-86-
07-004 .
Following deliberations, the board took the following action :
WHEREAS , application under Appeal No . 3455„ a request for an
interpretation clarifying or correcting the interpretation of the
Building Inspector dated December 2 , 1985 has been duly filed on
January 17 , 1986 ; and
WHEREAS , said application requests : (a ) an interpretation
of Condition in Zoning Board of Appeals Decision in Appeal No . 3330
and Building Inspector ' s interpretation dated December 2 , 1985 ,
which states , _
" . . . That Lot #3 shall be restricted to one-family
use only, with no additional sleeping or -living
quarters in any accessory buildings (except as may
be allowed by legislative action in amending the
current zoning code ) . . . " ;
OR , in the alternative , (b) if the Zoning Board of Appeals decides
the Building Inspector ' s interpretation is correct , then to amend
the condition contained in Appeal No . 3330 to allow a continued use
of the preexisting two bedrooms for sleeping facilities contained
in the garage/apartment as an accessory use to the principal dwell -
ing on the premises ; and
WHEREAS , this board deemed it appropriate that the appeal for
the interpretation be considered by this board firstly and that the
alternative relief await this action of this board for the appeal
of the interpretation ; and
WHEREAS , the board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question , as well as the surrounding
area in this Residential and Agricultural Zoning District ; and
WHEREAS , after due notice , a public hearing was held by the
Board of Appeals on the Interpretation Request (a ) , supra , and
Southold Town Board of Appeals -22- April 16 , 1986 Special Meeting
(Appeal No . 3455 - VARANO, decision continued : )
concluded on March 13 , 1986 at the Southold Town Hall , Main Road ,
Southold , New York ; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard
were heard and their testimony recorded ; and
WHEREAS , all testimony and written documentation have been
carefully considered ; and
WHEREAS , the board made the following findings of fact :
1 . The premises in question is located in the ,"A-80 " Resi -
dential and Agricultural Zoning District ;
2 . Article III , Sections 100-30 and 100-31 , Bulk Schedule ,
of the Zoning Code , permit one-family detached dwellings , not to
exceed one dwelling on each lot , and does not permit sleeping or
living quarters in an accessory structure in this zoning district ;
2 . Article III , Section 100-31 , Bulk Schedule , requires a
minimum of 80 ,000 sq . ft . for a lot , and a Variance was granted
under Appeal No . 3330 concerning the subject premises from the
lot area requirement to allow 76 , 300 sq . ft . for Lot #3 in this
pending minor subdivision proposal .
4. Existing upon the subject premises is a single-family
frame house , and the subject accessory structure which is depicted
as "garage-ap ' t" on survey amended September 6 , 1984 ;
5 . In paragraph numbered "7" of the board ' s decision and
findings rendered May 2 , 1985 under Appeal No . 3330 of which this
interpretation is made , it was noted that " . . . it is the understanding
of the board that the property has always been used for single-family
purposes and therefore does not recognize the accessory structure
as a "garage-apartment . "
6 . It is the position of this board that the since the
use of the subject accessory building (depicted "garage/apartment " )
was questionable by the Board of Appeals during 1985 when they
rendered a decision under Appeal No . 3330 , the subject accessory
building as an apartment or sleeping quarters use may not have
been legally established and continuously used as such from prior
to the enactment of zoning in 1957 up until the time of the
board ' s decision , and therefore requires additional relief by
the Board of Appeals for consideration by formal application ,
public hearing , et cetera .
NOW , THEREFORE , on motion by Mr . Grigonis , seconded by
Mr . Goehringer , it was
Southold Town Board of Appeals -23- April 16 , 1986 Special Meeting
(Appeal No . 3455 - VARANO, decision continued : )
RESOLVED, that it is hereby determined that the December 2 ,
1985 letter of the Building Inspector is correct and that the
May 2 , 1985 Condition Rendered in the Decision under Appeal
No . 3330 shall be interpreted as not allowing any sleeping or
living quarters in any accessory building , existing or
proposed .
Vote of the Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Grigonis
and Doyen . (Members Sawicki and Douglass were absent _ ) This
resolution was duly adopted.
PENDING DECISION : Appeal No . 3456 :
Application of RICHARD AND ANITA WILTON for a Variance to the
Zoning Ordinance , Article III , Section 100-31 , Bulk Schedule for
approval of proposed lots having insufficient area , width and/or
depth in this pending division of land , located at the East Side
of Queens Street , Greenport , NY ; County Tax Map Parcel No . 1000-
40-3-6 .
Following deliberations , the board took the following action :
WHEREAS , a public hearing was held and concluded on March 13 ,
1986 in the Matter of the Application of RICHARD AND ANITA WILTON
under Appeal No . 3456 ; and
WHEREAS , the board has considered all testimony and documenta-
tion entered into the record concerning this application ; and
WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact :
1 . The property in question has a frontage (lot width ) of
332 . 92 feet along the east side of Queens Street , Greenport , and
is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000 ,
Section 40 , Block 3 , Lot 6 .
2 . The premises as exists contains a total area of 1 .8471
acres , and it is indicated on survey updated December 10 , 1985 ,
that premises was of recent date improved with four structures :
(a ) frame building set back 47 . 2 feet from Queen Street at its
cloest point , (b ) accessory shed structure situated north of the
framed building in " (a ) " , supra , (c ) two frame accessory build-
ings encroaching over the front property line along Queen Street ,
which are to be removed or have , as of the date hereof , been
removed .
3. By this application , appellant requests spproval of
rn5
RICHARD F. LARK
ATTORNEY AT LAW
MAIN ROAD - P. O. BOX 973
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935
TELEPHONE 516 734-6807
September 6, 1994
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall , 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ATT: Melissa Spiro, Planner
RE: Cluster Subdivision for Kathleen Varano
SCTM #1000-086 .00-07.00-004 .000
Dear Ms . Spiro:
Pursuant to the letter of the Southold Town Planning
Board dated April 17, 1992, I am enclosing the following:
1. Map of Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. , last
amended Aug. 31, 1994 , which states it
is a cluster subdivision and locates
the building envelopes for all lots .
2 . Authorization of Kathleen Varano to
act on her behalf in the subdivision
process.
3. Full Environmental Assessment Form.
4 . Check No. 927 of Kathleen Varano draWO,
payable to the Town of Southold in
in the amount of $400. 00 for the
review fee.
After you have reviewed the above, kindly let me know if
the map is acceptable so I can proceed with the application
to the Board of Appeals.
Very t ly yours,
rr
RFL/bd chard F. L
Enclosures
-�&Y,Ogra Ce*'Y\ \ Aa s a ce > w P.Q. oe RIt919y work SVLy'�, 6[E.
AOwe a_Wtrarh* 2 oP�:e.�Slca�.{C.�nw�iJai '. O ID.7rF
�? �ocuD w1 09
`rh orfS�N Plgr, w�ih rwc\ �I6'�; no
vor:aMr� fe�u;rp l,. SOUTHDLD1
U Lbs'�r w M �k� \o{s-Wrigmu S maj 4e eel- r.Qgry t. .0 <<1fS. PLANNING BOARD
MS
September 2 , 1994
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. 0. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
RE: Cluster Subdivision for Kathleen Varano
SCTM $1000-086 . 00-07.00-004 .000
Gentlemen:
I hereby authorzie my attorney, Richard F. Lark, Esq. ,
Main Road, P. O. Box 973, Cutchogue, New York 11935, to
represent me during the subdivision process .
Very my yours,
v���
Rat leen Varano
-) IBOARD
SEP PLANNIN
h�O��g�FFO(,��oGy
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS CA x SCOTT L. HARRIS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Dy �� Supervisor
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179
Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
April 17, 1992
Richard F. Lark
Main Road
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, New York 11935
RE: Minor Subdivision
Kathleen B. Varano
Indian Neck Road
Peconic
SCTM# 1000-86-7-4
Dear Mr. Lark:
The Planning Board has reviewed the map dated March 30,
1992, that was submitted on April 7, 1992. The Board finds the
map acceptable with the following additions:
1. It must be stated on the map that this is a cluster
subdivision.
2. Building envelopes must be shown for all lots.
In addition, the following information must be submitted:
A. A Long Environmental Assessment Form and the $400.00
review fee.
B. Authorization from the owners of the property for you
to act as their agent during the subdivision process.
Please refer to the Planning Board' s letters of March 18,
1992, and November 7 , 1990, for additional information
pertaining to this subdivision.
When the above mentioned information has been submitted,
the Board will forward a copy of the map to the Town Trustees
for review and will initiate the State Environmental Quality
Review process. The application will be scheduled for a sketch
determination upon receipt of a report from the Trustees.
i •
Kathleen B. Varano
April 17, 1992
Page 2
Please contact this office if you have any questions
regarding the above.
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
S V/
RICHARD F. LARK
ATTORNEY AT LAW
MAIN ROAD- P. 0. BOX 973
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935
TELEPHONE 516 734-6807
April 3, 1992
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ATT: Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman
RE: Minor Subdivision for Kathleen B. Varano
SCTM #1000-086 . 00-07 .00-004.000
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
Pursuant to your letter dated March 18, 1992, I am
enclosing a print of the Revised Sketch Plan, amended March
30 , 1992 , which shows a cluster layout with two interior
flag lots . Kindly advise if the map is acceptable and if
anything else is required by the Board.
Very truly yours,
RFL bd /ichard F. k
Enclosure
cc. Southold Town Board of Appeals
Kathleen Varano
AR - 702 ALJ
SOUTHOLDTOWN
p�ANNING BOARD
T —
e ,
� •Y � _ RnAD - �
1
ry �
•�\ . . - . ., a C1 ?
3/O -- -. _' - • •�- q
O j '. : f -.
0444 tir
• 0 _ _ _ - - -
309.96 .f.z2'r9'zo"w. :3
� s 7�-7
97.9 4
97.
re;- dote `v
caarre ........,.. .
L APR -71992
WMWTOWN
pLANNimG ARD
TNL..EE- Wv V,-)4 ,4-] Z0, 15;21.
mAz.ao, X 992.
PEC L) N. y
5.-125 Ac�'HS
TAX Vo. 106,6 -86 - 7-4 M.9PPEDJUiy Z3, ;991
fdUrtD/KG ZOn1E: !Z-$O BCaari: :OV'=/" k:CJD&klCx VAK
L/CErJSED :.!'NC/ S✓�<✓Erah:3 `'`
Y.
i
0 MONUMENT
C= ,
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS CO2 SCOTT L. HARRIS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., ChairmanO Supervisor
George Ritchie Latham. Jr. .,J'�ffd�. .\���•
Richard G. Ward ' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179
Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
March 18, 1992
Richard F. Lark
Main Road
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, New York 11935
RE: Minor Subdivision
Kathleen B. Varano
Indian Neck Road
Peconic
SCTM# 1000-86-7-4
Dear Mr. Lark:
The Planning Board has reviewed your letter dated
February 28, 1992, which was received on March 4, 1992.
This application will be processed as a cluster subdivision
with variable lot sizes. The map dated January 3, 1989, which
shows three lots and a twenty-five foot right-of-way, has been
accepted as the Yield map. The Board will proceed with the
sketch determination upon submission of maps showing a clustered
layout with two interior flag lots.
As stated in the Board' s November 7, 1990 correspondence, a
Long Environmental Assessment Form is required for this project.
The SEQRA process will not be initiated until this form is
submitted. The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of
$400 for review of Long Environmental Assessment Forms (LEAF)
from their environmental consultant. Your client will be
required to submit this payment in full before the consultant
can be authorized to proceed with his review. In order to
expedite the review, this fee should be submitted along with the
LEAF.
Please refer to the Board' s November 7, 1990 correspondence
for additional information pertaining to the application. A copy
is enclosed for your convenience.
Very truly
/yours,
Bennett Orlowski,
Chairman
Encl.
cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
'j t ` T SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman `._ �✓� '� -��-
George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 9n ��
[ ,`. 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Richard G. Ward
P.O. Box 1179
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New Yorrkk
11971
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
November 7, 1990
Richard F. Lark
Main Road
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, New York 11935
RE: Kathleen B. Varano
SCTM# 100-86-7-4
Dear Mr. Lark:
The Planning Board has reviewed your submission of October
22, 1990 for the above mentioned subdivision.
The layout as shown, requires the construction of a road,
built to the alternate Town specifications, to provide access to
the interior lots. However, the Board will allow the layout to
be redesigned with two interior flag lots. The accessway for
each lot must be at least fifteen (15) feet wide. Each lot must
be two acres, not including the area of the accessway. The
two interior lots are to have a common driveway. This is to be
shown on the map.
In addition, you should be aware of the following:
1. As per Section A106-38 E ( 3) of the Town Code, the
Planning Board will be requiring a park and playground
fee of two thousand dollars ( $2,000. ) for each vacant
lot in the subdivision.
2. The Planning Board will be referring this map to the
' Board of Trustees for review. If it is necessary for
their consultant to review this site, your client will
be charged for his review.
3 . A Short Environmental Assessment Form was submitted.
However, a Long Environmental Assessment Form is
required for minor subdivisions. Also, all properties
within 500 feet of Peconic Bay are within a Critical
Environmental Area, requiring a Long Environmental
Assessment Form and classified as a Type 1 action
under SEQRA. A Long Environmental Form is enclosed
for your use. The completed form will be sent to the
Planning Board's Environmental Consultant for review.
Your client will be charged for the Consultant's
review prior to any work being started.
4. The maps must be prepared at a scale of 1 inch equals
100 feet, and be in accordance with all other filing
requirements of the Suffolk County Clerk's Office.
Upon submission of revised maps and the Long Environmental
Assessment Form, the Planning Board will make the necessary
referrals, and continue with their review.
Please contact this office if you have any questions
regarding the above.
Very truly yours
rBennett Orlowski, J " s
Chairman
enc.
_r
RICHARD F. LARK
ATTORNEY AT LAW
MAIN ROAD- P. O. BOX 973
CLITCHOGLIE, NEW YORK 11935
TELEPHONE 516 734-6807
February 28 , 1992
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ATT: Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman
RE: Minor Subdivision for Kathleen B. Varano
SCTM #1000-086 .00-07 . 00-004.000
Dear Mr. Orlowski :
The last time I appeared before the Planning Board, on
December 9 , 1991, it was agreed the Board would approve a
three lot minor subdivision, with each lot having 72, 300
sq. ft. , providing the applicant could obtain the necessary
area variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals. When I
discussed this file informally with the Clerk of the Board
of Appeals she recognized the hardship being placed on the
applicant due to the change in the zoning code regarding the
access requirements . . She suggested rather than ask for a
variance for the three lots, to go back to the original
subdivision, which had been granted a variance on May 2 ,
1985 , Appeal No. 3330 , wherein Lots 1 and 2 would contain
80 ,000 sq. ft. and Lot 3 would contain 76,300 sq. ft. Two
easements would be created of 121 feet in width each for
Lots 2 and 3, running to Indian Neck Road, which would have
a mutually agreed 15 foot accessway over the easement area
for ingress and egress to these two interior lots . I have
colored the proposed easement area in green for Lot 2 and in
yellow for Lot 3 and have superimposed the common driveway
for these lots in red.
The Board of Appeals Clerk pointed out that both the
Planning Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals recognized
there is only going to be three lots in this subdivision.
The Clerk indicated that the Board might not want to grant
three variances because it gould establish a misunderstood
precedent by the public. Originally when the variance was
granted $100-235 of the Zoning Code did not exist as this
section was added on January 10 , 1989 . The Clerk suggested
Kn:�
Southold Town Planning Board -2- February 28, 1992
it might be best to have Mrs . Varano apply for a variance to
§100-235 B. to allow the above-mentioned subdivision plan.
This would more accurately reflect the hardship that was
actually imposed by the change of the zoning regulations
rather than to have three area variances for undersized lots .
However, before proceeding it was suggested I write you a
letter to see if the Planning Board would have any objection
to this approach. If not, I would appreciate a response so
I can prepare the necessary application. If the variance
is granted by the Board of Appeals if there are any other
variances under the subdivision regulations than you would
have authority to waive them to accomplish this subdivision.
Very truly yours,
REL/bd
chard F. L rk
Enclosure
cc. Board of Appeals
2,11-6111
L:A, ct SgfAc ib MR. lark � rcrrec� rt4e s� irren rnu9e obcUe vc;
-Fur w VRt\anC2 -�'� Sec�,nn loo - ZS5I. Nle. "rk w;U sev\& a letter cerre&,vas
PLANNING BOARD • 21 DUMBER 9, 1991
C Mr. McDonald: We are going to have to take a look at the
drainage I assume.
Mr. Lark: No, they are going to talk about public water, they
are going to hook up the two ends of the subdivision to public
water.
Mr. McDonald: I 'm not talking about how they are going to get
water to drink, I am talking about how they are going to handle
the runoff.
Mr. Lark: Oh, you are talking about drainage.
Mr. McDonald: yes.
Mr. Lark: Did you want VanTuyl do give you a study on that?
Mr. McDonald: Well, let' s decide how the layout is going to go
before we spend your money.
Mr. Lark: Can we have a date on that?
Mr. Latham: We' ll get back to you.
Mr. Lark: When is the next meeting.
Mr. Lark: One died and one is sick so we are going to be here
every week.
Mr. Orlowski: Well, don't rush them.
Mr. Lark: I 'm not rushing them.
Mr. Lark: On Varano. I spoke to you the last time and I
think Melissa had the equal lot layout and I wanted to apply to
the Board of Appeals on that. Can I go ahead on that, would I
get a recommendation, a favorable recommendation?
.Mr. McDonald: Have you made a application to the ZBA?
Mr. Lark: I am in the process. I just have to finalize it. I
have a one lot variance now. Remember this is the one I have
the one lot variance?
Mr. McDonald: I 'm asking if you have asked the Board for a
change in the variance?
Mr. Lark: No, I wanted to hear it from you first because they
are going to ask me your input.
Mr. Ward: You have three lots so it didn' t matter to us.
• ,���`S FFO(,�C� •
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rn t z SCOTT L. HARRIS
SBennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Richard G. Ward
P.O. Box 1179
Mark S. McDonald Southold, New Yorkk
11971
Kenneth L. Edwards
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
December 3, 1991
Richard F. Lark
Main Road
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, New York 11935
RE: Minor Subdivision
Kathleen B. Varano
Indian Neck Road
Peconic
SCTM# 1000-86-7-4
Dear Mr. Lark:
The Planning Board is in receipt of your letter dated
November 25, 1991.
A hearing date for the above mentioned subdivision has not
been set for December 9, 1991, as indicated in your letter. If
you wish to address the Planning Board on a matter concerning
this proposal, you may do so during the December 9th meeting
after the Board finishes the scheduled agenda.
Please contact this office if you have any questions
regarding the above.
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. S'
Chairman
MS/ms
Ms
RICHARD F. LARK
ATTORNEY AT LAW
MAIN ROAD.P. O. BOX 973
CUTCHOGUE.NEW YORK 11936 D U`
TELEPHONE 616 734-6607
November 25, 1991
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
RE: Subdivision for "Kathleen B. Varano"
SCTM #1000-086 .00-07 .00-004 .000
Gentlemen:
In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am
enclosing a survey prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. ,
dated July 23, 1991 and amended Nov. 20, 1991 .
t
This is to confirm a hearing date of December 9 , 1991
with the Planning Board.
Very ly yours,
RFL/bd I�/chard F. Lark
Enclosure
(Fear,'N� bcCFe was n6i sdeguly& Ma. Lark planned, -Eu at6N& me4EI+Ali
'}O c��susS ePplico�:en vlQ.g>
DISCUSSIONS AT THE END OF THE NOVEMBER 18 , 199; PUBLIC MEETING
George Wiser on Southold Villas
SCTM# 1000-70-1-6
Mr. Wiser:
Discussed the bond estimate with the Planning Board. Asked
that he be allowed to come in with a Letter of Credit at
the actual contract cost. He stated that he had discussed
the matter with the Town Board and that the Town Board had
said that it was not an issue before that Board, and that
he should discuss it with the Planning Board.
Mr. Orlowski:
Said that if the Town has to actually do the work, it may
not be at the same price as Mr. Wiser' s contracts. He was
not in favor of setting a policy to accept actual
contracts.
Mr. Wiser' s banker discussed the funding aspects of the
project.
Mr. Saidmehr discussed that the projects ( the affordable
houses and the site plan) were being done together and that they
could not be separated. All infrastructure was to be done at the
same time.
xxx*********************xx****x*xx******x**x***xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Richard Lark on Kathleen Varano
SCTM# 1000-86-7-4
Mr. Lark discussed the option of either building a road or going
before the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance( s) from lot
area.
The Planning Board said that they would support 3 lots. Three
lots would be allowed with a road, therefore, they felt that
three lots should be allowed with flag lots.
xxxxxxxxxx*********x**xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*********xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Richard Lark on Harvest Homes (Grigonis)
SCTM# 1000-70-3-22
1SIUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
SENDER: , 0A VOV�To�f I IV 91 16Ill
SUBJECT: Kci Ikea UgrGhO
SCTM# : $6-7 - 4
COMMENTS: �0Ske-l-r ' mc�P wit egck 72 Soo c
-iScu55e& VYICT w� \h M2. �&rtic . (4,, A",U n � k.� roul
UwZhu,yl 1,.Jire me "S 6_-- -CQ(
''o Wo 1„W, I�cs c�ienlk wootj ka✓.t {o
Z�� or �V `G\ CUcit1. U
I
i
! 1
I\
M
F
' I I!
08/ O
q 'C
f I i
2 i
a
3
lit Q o
O
N,
x
Q
i
�5
1- SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
SENDER: -Dick I—Qf
SUBJECT: 2P/U (f GL rA n 0
SCTM# :
COMMENTS:
7- Z4 - F/
7lz61ak mnT wl MR, Lank.
�f 3 c.rec, is fess -kr ,v\ aced varAek �y Z A.
MR . Vs
+ � she weN� �gcMC rt 2B� . �69- 56,000 lai .
iN p;RN
NcC
_019 Y Igo 7b
�r5
D
x i
i
-(S'
v cn 4'
•h
.1
l70 q
,
'D
Gi
y v
I {, a
10
l :
a N
197
i
w gaY
pEGON(G
ROS T9>RQO
F
� �c �
s
PPS
SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
SENDER: -DiGk l—ark
SUBJECT: Kcc- W e m (f Q. rA p 0
SCTM# : _ 7 — `�
COMMENTS:
7^ zG - P/
7/2,6/q `I��scusse� , � U) Me, Lank.
3 area is less --k�,av\ occea gflafTek 6Y Z A.
V,,,�a�- his cliQ�"l'
�62 � 0007p
gll3lq� ��SC�SSed I�u��h /Y1o¢. Lark n P
IOId W%rn-vhc�- P C�, w4S r\A ln -C .uoR 04 su�rorA,N1 h•S
JUL 2 6 1991
. . ..... .. ..
Southold Town Board of Appeals - 11 - May 2 , 1985 Regular Meeting
(Appeal No . 3330 - DOMINICK VARANO , continued : )
and which the board finds is not substantial under the circum-
stances .
7 . It is noted for the record that it is the understanding
of the board that the property has always been used for a single
family purpose , and therefore does not recognize the accessory
structure as a "garage-apartment . "
In considering this application , the board has determined
that the relief as requested be granted since : (1 ) the relief
requested is not substantial in relation to. the requirements of
zoning , (2 ) the grant of this variance will not be detrimental
to the character of the area and will not adversely affect adjacent
properties , (3 ) the practical difficulties are sufficient , (4 )
in view of the manner in which the difficulties arose , the interests
of justice will be served .
Accordingly , on motion by Mr . Grigonis , seconded by
Mr. Sawicki , it was
RESOLVED , that the relief requested under Appeal No . 3330 in
the Matter of the Application for DOMINICK VARANO for approval of
the lot area of proposed Lot #3 of 76 ,300 sq . ft. , BE AND HEREBY
IS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION :
That Lot #3 shall be restricted to one-family use only with
no additional sleeping or living quarters in any accessory
buildings (except as may be allowed by legislative action
in amending the current zoning code ) .
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Grigonis ,
Doyen , Douglass and Sawicki . This resolution was adopted by
unanimous vote of all the members .
E= �
Southold Town Board of Appeals -10- May 2 , 1985 Regular Meeting
PENDING DECISION : Appeal No. 3330 - DOMINICK VARAN&
Application of DOMINICK VARANO , by R. Lark , Esq . , Box 973 , Cut-
chogue , NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance , Article III , Section
100-31 , Bulk Schedule for approval of insufficient area of proposed
Lot 3, at premises 6750 Indian Neck Road , Peconic , NY ; County Tax Map
Parcel No . 1000-86-07-004.
WHEREAS , a public hearing was held and concluded on April 11 , 1985 ,
o concerning the Matter of the Application of DOMINICK VARANO , and
WHEREAS , the board has considered all testimony and documentation
entered into the record concerning this application including corres-
pondence received in behalf of an adjoining property owner dated
February 14 , 1985 , and
WHEREAS , the board members have personally viewed and are familiar
with the premises in question as well as its surrounding area , and
WHEREAS , the Southold Town Planning at its meeting held March 18 ,
1985 , recommended approval of the subject variance application , and
WHEREAS , the board made the following findings of fact :
1 . The property in question is located in an "A-80" Residential
and Agricultural Zoning District , is situated on the southerly side
of Indian Neck Road , Peconic , and is more particularly identified on
the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000 , Section 86 , Block 7 ,
Lot 4.
2 . The subject premises as a whole contains 5.245 acres with
a total frontage along Indian Neck Road of 249 . 10 feet and a minimum
width of 195 feet.
3. By this application , appellant proposes a division of land
as follows : (a ) proposed Lot 1 of 80 ,000 sq . £t. in area , (b)
proposed Lot 2 of 80 ,000 sq . ft. in area , c ) proposed Lot 3 of
76 , 300 sq . ft. in area .
4 . Proposed Lot 3 is improved with an existong one-family ,
two-story frame house and an accessory structure which is depicted
as "garage-apt" on the survey map as amended September 6 , 1984 .
5 . Article III , Section 100-31 and Bulk Schedule of the
Zoning Code require a minimum of 80 ,000 sq . ft . in lot area
(effective May 20 , 1983 ) .
6 . The relief requested of proposed Lot #3 is approximately
five percent (5%) of a variance from the requirements of zoning
SEP 191994
SOUTHOLD TOWN -
PUNNING BOARD
r ! -
I
s i
4as
� t t
so o 0 o s.
56,
D
2 U u rs it t_
i
i�
I ,
s
{ " -. cn +zt .-titin rst additirnt
rr h t n,I!nn of n
1 ��V t .n i ns t o%"%.4 Yor, SFett
.ucetinn Low.
�
ms
^ j__. / / p not Matfnq r
i Z C k PLA Y the � �d:-ne/ar'y i�;xM soaV o; �
seai Shalf not be considered
to be a uzlid true oapy.
Ju, 2 6 1991 Guarantees Ind'inated hemon shall fun d
crny to tha person for a+,rm thn ctavoV
and on his bzhsif to tha `s}-
t
�A7-,..LEE N VA�QANO n^anYRonlimehal -y
and
Ifr rt � ninn listad h.rccn --:d
to hse of the IerdmR I ^ti-
..-._ Oe azs sue not trzn,=,*mrahie y
iCa.C.Ci;i�O?l instltnhOne of S[169eaUBIY(
_ 7. -4Z5_AG265
rAx No. 100.0 - 86 - 7- 41 Juc. y Z3, 1991FN w
� E
Y
sCAcE : !OO'= /•• Q. ✓A hl ruY4., A. C. .
?i CS
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman y0 O� Supervisor
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179
Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823
November 7, 1990
Richard F. Lark
Main Road
P.O. Box 973
Cutchogue, New York 11935
RE: Kathleen B. Varano
SCTM# 100-86-7-4
Dear Mr. Lark:
The Planning Board has reviewed your submission of October
22, 1990 for the above mentioned subdivision.
The layout as shown, requires the construction of a road,
built to the alternate Town specifications, to provide access to
the interior lots. However, the Board will allow the layout to
be redesigned with two interior flag lots. The accessway for
each lot must be at least fifteen (15) feet wide. Each lot must
be two acres, not including the area of the accessway. The
two interior lots are to have a common driveway. This is to be
shown on the map.
In addition, you should be aware of the following:
1. As per Section A106-38 E ( 3 ) of the Town Code, the
Planning Board will be requiring a park and playground
fee of two thousand dollars ( $2,000. ) for each vacant
lot in the subdivision.
2. The Planning Board will be referring this map to the
Board of Trustees for review. If it is necessary for
their consultant to review this site, your client will
be charged for his review.
3. A Short Environmental Assessment Form was submitted.
However, a Long Environmental Assessment Form is
required for minor subdivisions. Also, all properties
within 500 feet of Peconic Bay are within a Critical
Environmental Area, requiring a Long Environmental
Assessment Form and classified as a Type 1 action
under SEQRA. A Long Environmental Form is enclosed
•
for your use. The completed form will be sent to the
Planning Board's Environmental Consultant for review.
Your client will be charged for the Consultant's
review prior to any work being started.
4. The maps must be prepared at a scale of 1 inch equals
100 feet, and be in accordance with all other filing
requirements of the Suffolk County Clerk's Office.
Upon submission of revised maps and the Long Environmental
Assessment Form, the Planning Board will make the necessary
referrals, and continue with their review.
Please contact this office if you have any questions
regarding the above.
Very truly yours
Bennett Orlowski, J �"S
Chairman
enc.
RICHARD F. LARK M-S
ATTORNEY AT LAW
MAIN ROAD-P. O. BOX 973
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935
TELEPHONE 516 734-6807 t'CT 2 2 '990
October 5, 1990 11U1
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
ATT: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman
RE: Minor Subdivision for Kathleen B. Varano
(Suffolk County Tax Map No. District 1000 ,
Section 086 .00 , Block 07 .00 , Lot 004 .000 )
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am
enclosing the following:
1. Original and duplicate original of
Application for Approval of Plat which
has been signed by all parties.
2. Questionnaire.
3 . Letter regarding grading, roads and
drainage.
4. Short Environmental Assessment Form
5 . Check No. 346 of Kathleen Varano to the Town
of Southold in the amount of $2 ,500 .00 .
My records indicate on June 10 , 1985 the Southold Town
Planning Board granted sketch map approval subject to
Article 6 approval which was obtained on September 22 , 1989.
On January 16 , 1989 twelve prints of the revised map, dated
January 3, 1989 , were filed with the Planning Board.
Subsequently, the Planning Board staff requested an updated
application because they had lost their file and also wanted
new filing fees. Mrs. Varano is a widow and a person of
limited means. It has taken her considerable time to obtain
the exorbitant filing fees. Hopefully at this stage the
Planning Board will give their prompt attention to finalizing
this minor subdivision.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours ,
RFL/bd chard F ark
Enclosures
' R �NOIRN N6Grr --�.
arses
4 3
o
t4t fi ?
CL_ _._--- .'. _ _ . - . ..
C, 1 * h ! ..
e � .
1�1 4
V z tq o
; . tA
Yl
N
G- F t
W t
ba
a tj ,
fA
Ir
i
� E
zo I
wz
Rt
n C
gAY
b Ips tNDjAN NE -
P
i
wo
®R y
N�cC
' y
0 It
a 1
ryN'
6urp
t �
0q s. 2Z' 29'3o"E. ; 49rr
It f35 C 40C 310
. Q px1fi'misd6 ., t
a Y
- -Jtv, -
k n �, --r j_ i o
t
Soaoo s. �. 0 8opv4 s. i{
C• �� 76000 d. F.In
>✓. z2 • r 4 'Zo,o
JJ Z 4
6
p•l8
3y•Z` �.3 7!•ZI Ca.srrrfors Grlveway' of x
' 91.94
T"es r Noc•P V
Jatidy '
_ .c.a ttuN C30,
y G04rJf =s Indra ..�hovor.,.,.
Q
person for
1 mn .,
Jt717d � ((pp�� M ena an� hisnn nY 9xrmm�n m '
i i
, • NI
14¢' APR - T
ground s•etQp --..--
- f
17' FOlL NING I
�A7-H� .EE .�'J V.4&1 t-? 1'�t .4a✓ryNOdtJ Nov. 20, r99�.
- - -- - -
___ _ _— _. _ ___-_-- • Mlle. 30, /99Z.
PGC 0 aic N. y r
7-AX No. /000 AlappaD Jute Y Z3, "991
,ButLotrtG ZONE : 2-80 SC,Ae— : 1,00'= f" wOD&QtCw- vgt4 T-UYL, P. C .
- GIGElJSED :.F+NU SU�iVEYo7Z.i
' 61RiEENOoi2r, N. f.
O � MONUXI6NY
' . bit.4 2 .• i'
.T - - .. 'l�rA,niF"` Sxa". ^n^." rmw:ai� � v. •-- i. -a'. .. a..
a4
' j � I 11i72•j�'{� ry�O� �N�N,`JIgE�gt W�M"�!G__`. �� ��`'e�� ..
w.
pit
fd
V ;
0f
Sk
tl
1
f
RR
{ 3,r L�
I IL
17
fib
n " yr.it � .x
� p
z t
� Y
tz
.. #':i �6,{t'>�$"A"�c;,.�,"'.."` "t '', . " .. �._� ..s .., .rwn.�;e: -�:.�ef" .ren. *�Y y �, �wsg.a..-.r. :+v" '*�. _ _•a.'.•..+.v..--.. -x'iw-.;w -..'.�w�'..�"_' '�' r.
a ,
44
Hf o �i
y // 41 6urh✓fJN ¢ +�1CN/OAZllS ° ��c� �/LL��iiWW � f
b' 3- zz 29'30"8.
10 ?S 8005. 8-0,0*fat4to rs' stri
/:� 80,000 S. 1's '=a b • . Irl I O 1'C V _kB�i MA!'�
10
y ld. 7$ri� i►t. 30 i
} o d.3T �Ca.n/ssor� oriwsuray rs a' d
f 91-4+F O u 8 ¢. u I-
SBS 81994.
4
SGUTHOLD TGWN
\ PLANNING BOARD
JIt�/f r
-
dwwrl
jground watsr /44" A. _ re,u..a,.yvarS t,eND
I
PAZ EF'AI2E0 Arc)2
,
I K.QTN�.. VA�f� NQ ,4*20 Dido Nov. xo. 1991.
MAC. So, 199Z.
t+ • 4po- zx. 199z.
PCs >v t7 we.- A/, Y Avg. 3; 1994.
�: 4Z•S AG12S5 -
TAx No. 1000 - 86 - 7 q Mr9vv6p Jur. Y Z3, J 991
I 13utC.QJKG ZONE: f�- 90 SCALE; !d 4'- J" leborewx ✓*V" ru IL, A. C .
LICE/J�SED 4AND Su�✓EYot¢,3
61tEENvoRr, N. Y.
O tr M/bNtlrtiOrWT
//dz - b
J,
] i 111
1. .
P.
h l
i
n'
.. ,JJNuC _�?,� •iJL'
iSL H..F % /viii
3, TNi IM14'a7F, v/"1�'LI APo'O
f=F/CIL(.'"i1� YG/� .4LL LG. t'Mr':: Sf.i/ ...,� r. •..
Iva
. . r',i../-�r�.•, ,,, iRf.'G ':41',5'1-_.: - � - _ _ ,. ,_
Q-R9 suuscrr ��dONi� 0
I
1 - _
TAk b b aMrj wAl wA VA rp-A F J.0
rdad�ap�d+MI1M AThleeu (i. yi►(zA�10
InM )Sn� a� "wawddd — w
rwn�pdY.a an wa dim 00L TAM.�.�rl mumm a
�_ r,�L� oaronwwon.ana.rdA b eA.a r Mir wb e amid wmr
w.n
vWwM did a wm aur r ur .ra.ea�wra � ,
q No ow k d*"d dw ow Cady'Cb*ask ani ym d
NodML C~16 ArrM OWN Ax er an
Wkia we Mdomm" {n dr ON"a ow Cadb Co* - -.
Nyaooawrib /y d M Pubic IMtiA Lir ad M• a �,
J � l
a% Jaw"Jaw"(..wm G.
P.
1/I
OAldld d EdrYnual�Y Qua '
aid*
I n
I
i. ¢ l.!'1 1G' ire ..,it�a%i0933 F C6 I
w
1mvd
x+ln V dei - f
61
u a�1Pi0 1 ,
` � 1
j '
I
r
v I
i,
.`F
h 3n8 - rs
ti, 'tw�15
' Jit f.i''i i ^,'GG' �.._. := • _ ., ... - ,. _
i
• r r r �
' n«.. `'' r 1 i,,..?�- !.. l tl !k r-� ,.:_ f" 1 4.-' F . n'c;c, E»v:: G•r-t { x. t t' c�_
I - R7 ud&11 A:✓ 1^JE'J+= F:O rIl:v _ . -. - , _. _ _ __ -
l�"C_'.n.��?.^✓f L � PPr:�pfl�, h'."Y, rl?'S9` �.'F', , 'ih_. - . . ' _. '
tir„ h7L. fDC -'�','O _ • ' ��_ yY3f' I _$,rig+� � t _ _ � i _ '. _
:S r2 twgax€ " >F'�4,� r'{' MF F44.
I r •. _ J.t JL''�'R W��fuJ.A"'!'�, I ��! KJ °R`u .�',' TS�i�i,. -
1: F - . :Fa:.. , ,1ryB,.. :!_;:..';7 Qd1 ''ft5^7-4, - ' -
l
a :N LRd1.yLFrMt$ tiNR' A.1iG'x,._
. .ik':n rx1E'SFf#M'.,TF: Gu 9M1t
AVpxOf
5 r h} Lam. n.rY 5 h 47A6
A
:y�r '
/e
> reW 6rd1�A -89 4r/'-'k'' MNC#t + x",E EtGE to to
f I
$t**&T0lcQ ENAN3S 61lllfi{:1
s k sk m trio maf'frTI
" firarFa
M
SUFF" cAutljY DEPS vF'HEaitriw�GAVIC�8 MAY —'4 1995 t -'
�pN IZ tQ95 CREVISCrA�
I .. '.X0118raTR1iM�Idfr7xl+� rAi 4YFr 'r'yY1tF.'�;
i 71111{la�b ON* V*R Mi'. - - PLANNING BOARD
&Id 11 9:�MWT (yT(�CP9 1Qi Vi4✓L
*
, 9M � T�-Idles' wlfht„Iridal = kb # tir_':rt&xt{ Cl
rrf,WPtvt44,"r -
%wo eppiQr?!I Ufa idb6+n/e A0f4 31i�1ip'ANN” � '-1 _ '
- �Ljdaidd lI1Blfadl of 71re I�fN,i GI+�' rFyr : htif3 F 9 t'S 71r ArJ '9`•i 17 "Jv rUt R .
f"" '�T�i�I=
rgMovd Iha�oa Vaud 0*k�lha eV6nf�Itd Ddo eE a } ;t4,41; n " a 'r<.,l r : nt w r wrr
Clf"wd-*p is 0dY fibd,wifh th6'CdUnb' r.ILtAC Y .I - -�:, .,. sem .-: p"',
• ,.r �'rx�C' Yyf � l
��j I ji � tz{triG1� 4
t"do* dQV*t.N oby f# �.r'Itw��fhe,llNro l -
klfddl'1 aad0 `rA^; in
', ryrm�+,Hlp_aa t.aw
�gn1411
5 �
W1
jx�1 . R
Y"'"JfJ`v a ;a k«.
-
`
-
„
9a0 aAu41
.
v
U; J
71U. `T
T'r PICAL Ln'1YOWT
} WE Lt, li CG'fT, i'6HNr5 COt)Kt �
[.�a73n E.
C
r
aw 6 UN -�4 INC II
j n;•' 41049.�- �I-
------------- 1
11 Zs
36I 378
F.M11 ! ST �U it
iv t u: r-¢. .;GL
tvElr„
- u o % —r ninnittf-,il°n I'I
I N in
ap0 '7G C) C 6 d
�U, CJUL _S T _ IG.¢ IT. D
— w1 L AP'T.- Grp N
a - JAN 181989
I r I 76,30U Sc'2. r•"Y'. '-n ' " sI.N
.�.' � I
+ G X _ TC T WFI I— _- _- - tT • �r �' r CJ ) SUUTHULU TOWN
S
4 � 'I� 1- � _ NG BUARU
�rii� L,.
vO
OF -u/Al TpTAI LEN6TI{ FOU 3, fHC�OIJ:�H `,YGGL�.". 40 _
_ IL
4
?33.7 a �
Mil
,
z_
_�.
', °' h r-,rzmmmirHircc�]h=rson uiN'r�. • I
r f I reg o hon hai ']'�nr
I w r __ _ _._ __ __ _ p -' «, h s CT , _ _ _ ___' r r' pr avcran•n l a.0 o u
nVles he ns
r L JSF 39 J)♦211 {0 i� f- I'
I l�i I, I ry (,.G �'� t✓I f�1� it� .v„cl{P+191,.itIC7l.+!P muknytun�6
!'E' A00 SPINAGF' i.. ( .`,i Obi(qt. S`;5T'L:iv"t:i s . I ,� •+r. -(
7S:+1'l' .'t--1 UF?ZY�b
AMEUDEU JULY Zr 1964 .
SEPT. 6, F
ISN � � �-�._—._
- ..
�PT 3y )86 '
i � ,;,t,'.n`� iv Ff !i „ {�. -_ .___ ` i'," ,.� pl i ,�(� w”. ot• r 'a �" S; n I, rA -
_ � I
O.
Ik.. nq . itP.on.� oci �I �fl_C)� LC.L.YAZ h!_'1Y. i
� 'r ( r'
� � � �' '
ti
4.4 M '} fn .'� ' } ✓ ACI;-L„S. 1 ^ r j `� }��nr _
14aaT4`< IN - ° r
Y,� ur. Ii u�AkrSFi BU14.DIhi G_ZC7t4—C—A�_
5/.nlu - CoWT`QQrZS FY"0M COUN'!•Y' M�Ai? ; i:a;,' � `• F
I I
— _,... _
�.-..
� f7 DEED : L.I�j58 P. 2"7Z,r;i2.Fc
..........
I I-L
GUI WAN WICLAAPC)!:i
L
ll
IV 5. rA".
U/
%, M16J.
TYr'l CAL LAVOOT
WELL,
'OT r. rssrar3
----I i COU9T
2
5,22 29 30 E.
36 410
I. oy3-78
to
<
ELI
%t -
'fflTll
to
c)o 0 6ARAIS
A P'T,��
TEST WFI-L
G
T Ld
0 V)
400
ir If 'I
5 AAM
3- t 4.2?.'19po %114
' "
'130996 - - _7,3, _17
N 14 1`.)OJ
C) >
OF
VL:y Nww, u 8 c)i v i s o
D7TM' 11 _ ...... --------
1 1, -, 0 f:
r, mJNGF
Tl-,�:;T HOLffi r1l i I -S-J .,
Z6
SEPT 6 SFPT is lqs� UAM
�4
JUNE 16g198 jJA gp �j
7 CU JLEE[j R-
C;o:k�A�4 r L Tll-,L ScA" IK AT�
I AT,
AS F; A'C�I�TYE D 1��L
----------- 3A141Z
COA25 n - D �
TTL V. PCj��A 9L g�g,�p
'A I CX),)- E,
114-4
c - 1 1 . 1 - N-5
ARF .,4zz;, Acr"c,-,.
�w fj,�\l TQVI/
61 1 . 102u=1--
4 1
J--
p IWATM IM
wnm *A
4
tONTOU
URVEY0kSl 117
�LAND F
Z'?z tv-rr F.) I ' ' : Of