Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-86.-1-9TEST HOU~ NO. 1 1EST HO~E NO. 2 I~ST H~ NO. 3 Young Jc Young, Land Surveyors 400 Osbrander Avenue, Ri~erkec&d, New York ftgOl 516- 727-2303 / n.0' ~m. now or formerly ~ ~ I ~ ~'~ Robert K. Simon & Elizabeth K. Simon I ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ / . re.o' o ~ o ~ ~ ~ dennie Lee Pierce o ~ Arco = 4.0000 Acrea I + ~z~ ~ / now or fOrmer . , m ...--' -' - ~ 5~.35 & doze Mc .... .--PO~ Or f - L-J - ~x TH NO 2 ~5~ - oubdiv~i~n ~ , -- - ~ ~ . f' ~J ~ ~ ~ ~ ...... X ... ~*SB~ /- ~ T.H. HO. ~ m .//~' ./" SHO~ AND A~ DIMENSIONAL ~O GEODE~C DETAILS ARE CC , ---~ ~ RICHMOND CREEK FARMS ~ Suffolk County, New York ~) = PIPE FOUND "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL LOTS SHOWN ON IHIS PLAT COMPLY ~ITH KENNEIIH F. ABRUZZO. L.S.N.Y.S. MC. NO. 49999 "I HEREBY CER~IFy IHAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED DECEMBER 15. 1997 AND lltAT AU. CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHOWN 1HUS: · ACTUALLY EXIST AND THE]R POSIllONS ARE CORREC~I.Y SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODET1C DETAILS ARE CORRECT." KENNEI~ F. ABRUZZO. L,S. N.%S. LIC. NO. 49999 THIS IS TO CERTIFY llrlAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPRO D BY THE PLANNING BOARD OF SOUTHOLD. APR O ti 1998 (row. OF S~LAN.,./~"O^RO> DATE OF APPROVAL CHARMAN , THE APPROVAL OF THIS MAP DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE ACCEPTANCE A OECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTI~ICTIONS HAS BEEN FILED SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES BASED UPON THE INFORMAIION SUBMIT[ED FOR THIS PROJECT. FLUNG /~/~ OF A REALTY SUBDIVISION OR DEVELOPMENT MAP ~TH THIS DEPARTMENT IS NOT REQUIRED UNOER THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 6 OF IHE SUFFOLK COUNTY SANITARY CODE SINCE AU. PARCELS ARE RESIDENTIAL AND EACHi~%,,~.I',~t~-'~.~j~...~"~?q~) APPLICATION MUST BE MADE FOR APPROVAL O¢ CONSTRUCTION OF WAIER 1~I~¢~ 19 DATE :FEB. 26, 1998 SUPPLY AND SANITARY FACIUTIES FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL AND STANDARDS OP THE OEPART~ERT, EFFEC~VE AT TIME or SUBM~SS*ON, MUST BE SA~SFIED. LOC'~TION MAP APR6 1998 SHEETJOD ND.No. ==96, OF- 10DBa DATE SCALE: 1"=OOO' MAP NO. 64H (960883PLAT,DWG) Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MI~MBEi?~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD/3. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 7, 1998 Julie G. Tiska, Project Assistant Peconic Land Trust P.O. Box 2088 Southampton, NY 11969 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for Richmond Creek Farms SCTM# 1000-86-1-9 Dear Ms. Tiska: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, April 6, 1998: The final public hearing, which was held on March 16, 1998 and continued on April 6, 1998, was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the Peconic Land Trust is the owner of the property known and designated as SCTM~ 1000-86-1-9 (a.k.a. SCTM~ 1000- 86-1-9.1, 9.2 and 9.3), located on the south side of Main Road and the north side of Wells Road in Peconic; and WHEREAS, the proposed minor subdivision is for Section 1 of a proposed subdivision with a total of four (4) lots; and WHEREAS, Section 1 contains two (2) lots: Lot Number 1 is 41.2849 acres in area, of which the Town has purchased the development rights on 37.2849 acres. Lot Number 2 is 7.9242 acres which will be further subdivided as Section 2, into a total of three 2 acre lots; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Page 2 Proposed minor subdivision for Richmond Creek Farms April 7, 1998 Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on the four (4) lot subdivision (both Sections 1 and 2) on January 26, 1998; and WHEREAS, as shown on the final map, there is a deed discrepancy in regard to the southerly most section of the parcel involving an area of 0.3403 acres; and WHEREAS, this discrepancy will be resolved by Peconic Land Trust giving the right to this property to Chester H. Skwara and Joyce M. Skwara; and WHEREAS, should the Peconic Land Trust, or future owner of Lot Number 2, choose not to proceed with any further subdivision of Lot Number 2, any development occurring on Lot Number 2 shall be set back at least 75 feet from the landward limit of the wetland. Grading within the 75' area shall be prohibited, and clearing and cutting shall be limited to that necessary for proper maintenance and removal of diseased, decayed or dead material and obnoxious plant species; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on April 6, 1998; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated February 26, 1998. Enclosed please find a copy of the map which was endorsed by the Chairman. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~ Chairman enc. cc: Building Dept. Tax Assessors THIS SUBDIVISION IS FOR -----LOTS ON___ ACRES LOCATE--S -' - ....,o~un ~h/O ROAD) -~=:uompiete application received '~pphcam advised of necessary revisions ' h Plan approval _ ~KA determination to Hre ~ommissioner [ u~u~caUon to applicant to i~-~.~ ...... ~ ~ - m ~ountv Planning Commission Rec=i~ of Couaty Report ~ ~ Review of $CPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Fi/ed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of my/ars and paper prints with Health approval . Final Public ~-/earing A p pro, va/'of sub division -W~th COnditions Co~?lete appticn/~/o~n re~ceived Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised su~ mission received Sketch plan approval -with conditions ACRES LOCATE'D ON Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination Sent to Fire Co~nmissioner Receipt of £irewe'll location NotLrication to applicant to inClude on £ina/ map Sent to County Planning Commission ReceiPt of County Report Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Fi/ed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mY/ars and Paper prints with FIea/th approval Final Public Hearing Approval of subdivision -with Condkions APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board o£ the To~vn of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final)approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulaiions of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the oxvner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be R'iohmond Creek Farms 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto ann suggested.) . exed. (Copy of deed 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Libor ........................ Page .................. On NOvember 15, 199;7 Libor ........................ Page ...................... On ..... Libor ........................ Page ...................... On Libor ........................ Page .......... On .... Libor ........................ Page ...................... On as devised under the Last '~Vill and Testament of ....................................... or as distributee .................... . .................................................... 5. The area of the land is 49.55 .................. acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the (late hereof have been' paid except .n../.a. . 7. The land is encumbered by . ..F.i..r.s..t.. mortgage (s) as follows: ................................................... (a) Mortgage recorded in Libor .............. Pa~e .................. in original amount of $.4.12X0.00...00 unpaid amount $ .412,0.00...'0D. ...... held by B,~.i.dgHhamp. toli. Nat. ..B.a..n.k. ....... address 2200 Montauk Highway, Bridgehamptzon, NY 11932 (b) Mortgage recorded in Libor n/a Pa~e ........... . ....................... in original amount of .............. nnpald amonnt $ ...................... held by ...................... .............. address ............................................................... By: Timothy J. Caufield Title: Vice President Sworn to before me this Iq~ day.of .~C c e ~ otc r- , 19 qv/ Notary Public, State of New York 11-2...~-1997 9:ZL3AM KF,,~LI~ OF 1'1~ At ~he mee~ng of l~e h~ld on Friday, No~embe~ 2 Upon a moron duly 1. Au~hO~Ze Jol~ ¥. ~:~omplish ~ ~quisifion c ['ION OF ~ 1~'1~.~ COM~'IITTEE )F THE BOARD OF DI]IECTOF, S ECONIC ~ TRUST, INCOF, I'ORATED Em~-afive Co~,'~ of the Peconic Land T~t, hcor~ora~,d Hampton Road, Sou~r:pton, New York~ ;ut/vt Comm/~..~ bein~ p~t, ~ following resc~u~:~ was seconded, tt~ .B,xe,~tlvc Co~ unanimously agrc~ m: orE. Blsir McC~I/n, ~o ex ~.~. dl docu,~-~ ~,.u~¥~,7 to ~o~ lx~l ($CTM#: 1000-86-1-9}, including, but not limi~t to: 2. Au',horiz~ ~he L~ developmeat righ~ f~om apl Town of Sou~hold for a~rro · l Tru~ ~hroush Joi~ v.H. P~]sey or E. Blail' i~.a.slil~ ~o convey the ro~im~!y 3'7 acres of the Nime Pmc~l (SCTM~. 1000.-86-1 ~ima~ly two buadz~d E. B~r ~ Tm~stu~ P~RD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOA~ Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer- to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence~ 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? ~ (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership abutting this p~rcel? Yes 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town , State, County, 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? 7. Does this property have a valid certificat~ of occupancy, if yes please submit.a copy of same Yes etc.) No No Yes ~ Yes ~ No I certify that the above statements are true and will be relied on bY t_~he P_lan, ning Board in co~n~sidering this application. v, ce Slg~nat~{~f ~_ro~erty owner or authorized age~E ' (~ate PeconVica La~ Trust, Incorporated Attachment to questionnaire for~'the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: On the _~9~ day of December , 19 97, before me personally came ~7~ ~. C~'£%[~ to me known to be the individual described in'and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. Notary Public TOWN OF $OUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Clerk's Office Southohl, N. Y. Certificnte Of Occupancy No..Z~..! .81 ...... Date .............. ~-.u~.e.- ~ ..... , 19.73. THIS CERTIFLES that the builcll,g located at . $/~..l~la;i. lX .ROaCl. (R~..2.~.).... Street Map No...xx= ....... Block No.. ~ ..... Lot N'o.:l:x~..P. eo.o.~e .... N.,.Y.,. .......... conforms substantially to the - ' ' -- .before, ApriL. ~3'.., 19.~.3'. pursuant ~o which~o' Z~lSt' ' dated ........ Ju~le .... .l~ .... , 19.?.3., was issued, and 'conforms to all if the require- ment~ of the applicable provisionz of the law. The occupancy for which this ce;tificate is i~ued is . -Pr&va~.e. ~ne. ~a~illr .dwelling.. & .2. ac~esso~r, buildil~s ........ The certificate is issued to . l[ath~rina .~I~al:a ..... (Arner ......................... of the aforesaid building. (owner; lessee or tenant) Suffolk County Department of Health Approval P.r.e-,. exis~tng ................ UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE No. · Pr~.--.. exis.ting. ............................... tIOUSH NUMBER....~2100....S~r~ .... ~faJ, m. Roact. Exceptions .~. housing .ccda~ ........... ' ..................... ' .... Ma~u_Houses t~hen, no shutoff at gas r~'~ '~ ........................ ~ont entzr~ce-, no light switeh%29b Accesso~ b~ld~ngs~ g~age needs repairs 30~c ~03~302b~u. ~otato storage has broken ~lass 302b TOWIt' OF SOUTHOLD I~uJ~DIZ~G- D~I~ARTM~iTT TOWI~ CL~B~.'$ OFFIC~ -qOu-z-~OLDo N. Y. CERTIFIEATE OF' nP.~UPANCY No.Z ..... Date ............. Oetobe~ ....l~ .... , 1966. THi.~ CEI~TJ.~i~.~ that the building located at S/S.. ~in..l{aad ............. Street Map Ho.. ~ ...... Block Ho. ~ · · Lot No. ~ .... PeSO · .N,~.., ...... conform.s substantially ~o the Application for Building permit heretofore filed In this office dated ......... &llgll~t~-.].(~.., 19~6. pursuant to which Building Permit No.. dated ......... Alig1~tr...]~_ .... 196~3.., was Issued, and conforms to all o! the require~ rnents of the: applicable previsions- of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is . l~az'~.b~,tlcliilg .... st;or&ge ................. : ............................. The certificate Is issued to . .~$. All.tone. $]~az'a.~ ............. 0~nez,. ........... (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid buildIng. Suffolk County Depa~h.ent of Health Approval ....... ]/.eR. .......................... Building- Inspector BARRETTA, L.L.C. '-- I Old Country Road Carle Placa, New York 11514 (516)663-0600 (800)276-0643 Fax (516)663-0650 (800)200-3499 NORT N14500 MAIN ROAD Southold Town of Southold SUFFOLK DIST: 1000 BLOCK: 01.00 SECT: 086.00 LOT : 009.000 10/31/97 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY SEARCH We have been advised by the Building Department that a search of their records has been made for the above captioned premises. The following information has been found: Attached find Certificates of Occupancy #'s Z5181 ISSUED 6/4/73 FOR A ONE FAMILY DWELLING & TWO ACCESSORY BUILDINGS. Z2534 ISSUED 10/4/66 FOR A FARM BUILDING. A Certificate of Occupancy has not been issued for EXPIRED BUILDING PERMIT # 'S 8018 ISSUED 6/25/75 FOR AN ABOVE GROLrND POOL. 15021 ISSUED 6/25/86 TO RENOVATE BUILDING. IN ORDER TO REACTIVATE SAID P~RMITS, OWNER MUST REAPPLY. Barretta, L.L.C. does hereby certify that the records of the above governmental agency were examined for NORTHSHORE ABSTP~ACT LTD. The information repor%ed above is a true and accurate abstract of the information reported therein and no liability is assumed. This report is submitted for information purposes only for the exclusive use of NORTHSHORE ABSTRACT LTD. 001300/001300 '~ id# 1717958 5231658 002 ;% I' i' L ! C A N T The Town Of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits ce.flirts of interest on the part of town o£ficors and em_ployees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alsrt the town of possible couflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessar~ to avoid same. YOUR NAME: Peconic Land Trust, Incorporated (Last name, first name, middle ill[iisi, yOU are apply/n~ :In the name of .omeone et.ge or NATURE OF AP['LZCATION: (-beck al.[ that apply. ) Tax grievance Variance Chan~e of zone Approval of plat xx Exemption from plat or official map Other (If "Other," name the -activity.) parent, or ehil. fl) have a re.Lation~hip ~ith any officer er employee of tho To.n of Sonthold? "Relationship- include~ by blood. which the town officer or employee ba~ even a partial ' ovnersblp of (or emp.toym~nt by) a corporation itt which the town officer or employee ova. more than 5% of the NO xx If you answered 'YES," complete the balance of tOls form and date and sign where indicated. ' Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe tile relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the towu officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spotlse, sibling, parent, or child is (checlc all. that apply), _A) tile owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of tbs applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a noncorporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or _ D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELA'PIONSI[I|~ 14-16-2 (2,;87)--7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- [y, there are aspects of a proiect that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 r-lPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 7 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the proiect could have a signif'icant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORr~ION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe< on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considere as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiom information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on. information currently available and will not involw new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specif, each instance. NAME OF ACTION Richmond Creek Farms LOCATION OF ACTION {Include Street Ad~ress, Municipality and County) 42100 Main Road (N.Y.S. Rte.25), Southold Town, Suffolk County NAMEOFAPPUCANT/SPONSOR Peconic Land Trust, Incorporated ADDRESS PO Box 2088 BUSINESS TELEPHONE (51~ 283-3195 CITY/PO STATE I ZIP CODE Southampton NY 11969 NAME OF OWNER (If different} I EUSINESS{ ) TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE OESCRIPT~ONOFAOTION This property had a potential density of 24 single family residences. We sold development rights off 38 acres and have reduced the density to 4. This project is a 4 lot minor subdivision on 49.55 acres. There is a pre-existing single-family residence and barns on proposed Lot 4. Lot 4 also includes 37.63 acres of preserved farmland. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: fqUrban [Industrial E~Forest [~griculture 2. Total acreage of proiect area: 49.55 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL} Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (indicate type) 3 What is predominant soil type(s) on proiect site? Tm, PTA, [Commercial I-IOther :~0Residential (suburban) []Rural (non-farm a. Soil drainage: ~Well drained 90 % o~ site :~rModerately well drained 9.95 % of site ~:Poorly drained .05 % o~ site b. f any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NY' Land CIassificauon System? 41 .5 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? []Yes a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION +/- 45 acres 37.63 acres +/- 2 acres +/- 2 acres 1 acres 1 acres HaA , RdB, RdA, RhB, CpA 5'. Approximate percentage of sed project site with slopes: ::[~0_109/i.O.~ % ~_10-15% % [~15% o'II~reater % 6. Is proiect stbstantiallv contiguous to, pt contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ~Yes ~No ~7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks~ ~Yes ~No 8. What is the depth of the water table~ 9.6 ' -[in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~Yes ~o 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the proiect area~ ~Yes ~No 11. Does proiect site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ~Yes ~No Accordin8 to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site~ (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other ~eologicai formations) ~Yes ~No Describe 13. Is the project )Jte presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ~Yes x~]No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? :~Yes [No Open farmland 15. Streams within or contiguous to proiect area: Tributary contiguous to property on south west sid: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Richmond Creek 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name Richmond Creek b. Size (In acres) +/- 10 acres 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ::lief es [-1No a) If Yes, does su[ficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~'Yes r-lNo b) If Yes, wi[[ improvements be necessary to allow connection? ]~'es [~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~]Yes X~,No But we are enrolling the property for 1998 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 6 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 :X~Yes [No Richmond Creek 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? []Yes :~No B. Project Description ' 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 49.55 acres, b. Project acreage to be developed: 1 1.9 acres initially; 11.9 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped 37.63 acres. d. Length of proiect, in miles: n/a {If appropriate) n/a e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing n/a ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour n/a (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Farml¥ Multiple Family Initially 1 C Ultimately 4 i. Dimensions (in feet) o[ largest proposed structure n/a height; __ width: length j. Linear feet o[ frontage aion~ a public thoroughfare proiect will occupy is? 1,218 ft Condominium 2. How much natural materia~e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? I~Yes []No :;~/A a. If yes, for what intend.,- purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? EYes I-1No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I-lYes []No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this proiect? []Yes 6. If single phase proiect: Anticipated period of construction n/a months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated n/a (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I-lYes ENo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? I-lYes 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction n/a ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this proiect 0 11. Wi[[ project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [~Yes ~No If yes, explain 0 tons/cubic yards year, (including demolition). year. 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? EYes X[]No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewa§e, industrial, etc.) and amount. b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? EYes :E~L'4o Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain no EYes ~No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? []Yes a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? []Yes []No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanita~ landfill? e. If Yes, explain fqNo []Yes []No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~lYes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? J~es E]No tons/month. Traditional farming 19. Will 20. Will 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? EYes ~No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from we~ts, indicate pumping capacity n/a 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [Yes If Yes, explain project routinely prdduce odors (more than one hour per day)? []Yes X~No project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? []Yes gailonstmmute. X~No practices X~No 4 C 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board I-]Yes City, Town. Village ?lanning Board :~Yes City, Town Zoning Board []Yes City, County Health Department :ii'Yes Other Local Agencies :;~]~'es Other Regional Agencies fi]Yes State Agencies ]~'Yes fi]No Federal Agencies []Yes Minor Subdivision Subdivision Approval Southold Town Trustees Tidal Wetlands Permit 12/22/97 12/29/97 12/29/97 C. Zoning and Planning Information I. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ]~¢~'es I-1No · If Yes, indicate decision required: fi]zonin§ amendment []zoning variance [special use permit ]~%ubdivision t']site plan []new/revision of master plan []resource mana§ement plan []other 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? .R-80 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 24 sinqle-family residences -- requesting only 4 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? n/a 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? n/a 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? x~[Yes I-]Nc 7 What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a V~ mile radius of proposed action? Resident~ial (R-80,R-40) Agricultural Conservation (A-C), Richmond tree General Business 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ~A mile? ]C~:Yes 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 2.4087 acres 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [Yes Xl~Nc 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police~ fire protection)? ]~Yes ~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? []:Yes rqNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? il-lYes :~-No a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? []Yes I-INo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your proiect. If there are or may be any adverse impacts assocmted with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them, E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Date ~ Applica~,j,~me Peconic Land Trust the action eC stal~rea, and you areaslateagencg, comple~elheCoastal~sse~sment [orm before proceeding ~ith thi~ 5 Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEH~.MAG, NITUDE Responsihillty o~ Lead Agency~ General Information (Read Carefully) · In completin§ the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have mv responses and determinations been reasonable.~ The reviewer is not expected to be an expert enwronmenta[ analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance Identifying an m~pact in column 2 simply asks that it be Iooked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showin§ types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3 · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore. the examples are illustra'~ive and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully} a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. [f answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially lar§e and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change{s) in the project to a small to moderate indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This impact, also check the Yes box m column 3. A No response must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the proiect site? ENO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will c~)ntinue for more [han 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill · Construction in a designated floodway · Other impacts 2. Will there bean effect t~..,Wun,queorunusua[land forms found on the site ( e, cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)L~NO ~YES · Specific land forms: 6 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact impact Project Change [] [] [~]Yes []No [] [] ~Yes ['-1 No ~ [] f'-~ Yes [-]No [] [] r-]Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ [ ~ ~Yes ~No II'PACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) [~NO r~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? I-1NO I-Iy E S Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: $ Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? [::]NO FqYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveye J off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action wilI allow residential uses in' areas without water and/or sewer services · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existin~ waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ENO EYES [xa~nples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 ~ I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact B6 Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] ~ ~Yes F'qNo [] [] 1~5 Yes ,m]No [] F-] ~Yes E~No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ QYes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~Na ~ ~ ~Ves ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~Nc ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway, · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality~ F-INO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? []NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? [3NO r-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other Focally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? [3NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land {includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 ~ I 2 3 mall to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] ~ E~Yes ~No [] [] [-]Yes I'-~ N o [] [] [-']Yes I--]No [] [] E]Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Y~s ~No ~ ~ ~Y.s ~ ~ ~Y*s ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~Na ~ ~ ~Yes ~Nc ~ ~ ~Yes ~Nc ~ ~ ~Yes ~Nc ~ ~ ~Yes ~N~ · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of a§ricultura[ land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of a~ricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip croppin[~); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~NO i-]YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or proiect components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enioyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Proiect components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed ^ction affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 [~NO EYES C ' The foreclosure of future recreational opportunity. permanent a · /\ maior reduction of an open space important to the community · Other impacts: 9 ~1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] t-~ Yes /~No [] ~ E~Yes ~No [] [] C'lYes [--]No [] [] ['-lYes [~]No [] [] C]Yes E:]No [] [] E]Yes E:]No [] [] [-]Yes E]No [] [] E]Yes F-]No [] [] [-]Yes E]No [] [] [-'[Yes [] No [] [] ['-]Yes I-~No [] [] E~]Yes E]No [] [] ~lyes E:]No [] [] ~JYes E-]No [] [] I--lYes [~]No IMPACT O~/'RANSPO RTATIO N 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ~NO F~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of peopl'e and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in maior traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ~NO i-!YE $ Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? - I-1NO ~YE$ Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action wiil remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? rqNO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic [ow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of ]iquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2.000 feet of a site used ~or the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: 10 · 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact B, Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Chang [] [] [~Yes ~]Nc [] [] ~Yes []Nc [] [] [-],Yes [~]Nc [] [] f-lyes []Nc [] [] []Yes I-1Nc [] [] i--[Yes [-1N( ~ G ~Yes ~N< ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~N~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~N~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~N~ ~ ~ ~Yes C IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5,%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this proiect- · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future proiects. · Proposed Action will create or e{iminate employment. · Other impacts: '~'1 t 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ~]Yes ~]No [] ~ []Yes [--[No [] [] {~Yes I~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~o ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? F~NO ~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 C Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. {Continue on attachments) 11 C 617.21 ~tate Appendix B Environmental Qualit' eview Visual EAF Addendum SEQR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 1 1 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be comp!eted by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility I. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? · National Park Service lands? · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? · County road? · State? · Local road? Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-V. Va-V2 V2-3 3-5 5+ Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other [~Yes [~No Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ~Yes DESCRIPTION OF VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1., check those which generally environment. describe the surrounding Within · i/. mile * I mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residentia~ [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed .5. Are there visually similar projects within: · 1/~ mile r-~ Yes []No · l miles []Yes []No · 2 miles []Yes []No · 3 miles []Yes []No · Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At worksite [] [] [] [] Other [] [] [] [] 2 Same as Standard N.Y.B.T.U.. Form 8002-Bargain and Sale Deed, with Covenant against Grantor's Acts- Individual or (single sheet) CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT--This INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY. DIST. 1000 SEC. P86.00 BLOCK 01.00 009 000 tHiS INDENTURE,~nadethe ,,,~"'~ BETWEEN dayof November, nineteen hundred and ninety-seven ANNA V. FIORE, LUDWIG H. STEIN, CHRISTOS CHRISTAKE, MARIA LONGO, ESTATE OF SILVESTRO EVANGELISTA and JOSEPH EVANGELISTA, c/o Anmt V. Fiore, 75 Down E~tst Lane, Southampton, New York 11968 party of thc first part, and PECONIC LAND TRUST, INC. 296 Hampton Road, P.O. Box 2088, Southampton, New York 11969 mrty of thc second part, WITNESSETH, that tile party of the first part, in consideration of Six Hundred and Sixty Thousand and xx/100 Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto tile parly of tile second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party o£ the second part forever, ALL [hul certain plot, piece or parccl of laud, sJtuatc, lyiag and being in thc Town ol' Southampton, Comity ol' 5;nflblk and Slale of Ncw York, bounded and described as follows: ee Schedule A attached. E the same premises conveyed to the Grantors herein by deed dated 2/9/93, recorded ~/27/93 in Liber 11626 page 900. TOGETIfER with all right, title and interest, if any, of Ihe party of the first part in and to any streets and roads ubulting the above described prmnises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the csIate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premise herein unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the secood pm't forever. ,ND the party of the first part covenants that the pm'ty of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first tort will receive Ihe consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration as a trust finld to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the I)aymcnl of (he cost of thc improvmlmnt hclbre using any part of thc total of thc stone fro' any olhcl* purpose. Thc word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WIINESS WHERE~(~ the party of the f rst part has duly executed this deed the day year first above wrillcn. ~ ~--.."~ / / and IN PR~~//~ Estate of Silvestro Evah~lista · ~- Y: 3/F gelista, E~xecutor .aw i g C~. Stein ~t'3/J~.. Z ~osephVEvangelista ~hris~~ Marla Longo (.,/ STATE OF NEW/3yORK ) COUNTY OF ./~'P~/Lq ) SS.: ~ On this [fl day of November, 1997, before me personallx appeare~LUD IG . S~IN, who, being by u)e duly ~wor~, said that he resides at ~ ~/~ ~ //~// ~P~ ~j' ~' ~ P~; ,~/~k~- that ~e is one of th~ Sellers~nentione~described hemiuq~fid that he executed Ihe foregoing nst 'ument; a ~d he duly ackaowled ed to me that he cxcculcd thc same. ~ STATE OF NEW,YORK ) i q.~*~,~' m Queens Cot,n~ COUNTY OF ~t~ ) SS.: ~mmission Expires August 31, . On th~s ~ day of November, 1997, ~fore me personally ~pgared CHR ~TOS CI[RISTAKE, wh9 being by me duly sworn, said that he resides at ~ ,; ..q,, /~ / ~:~ A///Ldod , the he~soneoftheSellersment~oned auu ocscrmca hereto and that he executed t ~e foregoi¢a inst 'u ncnt; and he duly ac~uowledged to mc Ihal be executed the same. ~ ~, - N~ Public ~TA~ rg~t C Slr [' Ct STATE OF NE~ YORK ) ~ Commissi~ E;:pi,,; COUNTY OF~~ ) SS.: On this ' / ~ day of November, 1997, before me personally came ANTHONY EVANGELISTA, to me kno. wn ~o, beingby me duly swum, did de o al ~g/G:-,r;' -2 ~P~x: /-4~5~ ~/. ~-- .- .... P se and say that he resides _ , the ExecutoE of tb~goods, chattgfs and credit(~[ 8]LVESTRO EVA . ~,~ .5 ~ ., .~ NGELISTA, Iate of ,.,~,,cu mm uescHoeo hereto, aha WhO, Known to iHg to ~ the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, acknowledged that he executed the s~e as Executor. otary Public ~ ~otatv~id,~}Y~2~[~ STATE OF NE~YORK, ) ~mmis,~n cOUnTy OF ) SS.: On this./~ day of November, 1997, befm~ me personally appel'ed JOSEPH '- w o, being by me du y swot., said aat he esides ~D ~ r~/~ ~. ~' ~//~ ~ ; that he is one of the Sellers menti~h~d aud de~ribed he]:din and thh( he executed the foregging instrument; and he dul acknowled ed me that be executed the same. ~ Y g to ~ · . ' Q ee ~s Coun~ STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF Suffolk ss: On the .'h~.~_ day of November, 19 97, before me personally came Anna V. Fiore to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged Ihat NANCY 1. YA NITER STALE OF/'JEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss: On the day of 19 , before me me personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, dkl depose and say Ibat he resides at No. that he is the ; of , the coq>oration described in and which executed the foregoing instrmnent; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such, co.orate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of dir~tors of said co~ration, and that he signed h name tl~ereto by like order. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF s s: On the day of 19 , before me personally came to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF s s: On the day of l 9 , before me personally came the subscribing wilness lo lhe foregoing inslrumenl, wilb whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn did depose and say that he resides at No. that he knows to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrmnent; that he, said subscribing witness was present and saw execute Ihe same;and Ihat he, said witness, at the same time subscribed h name as witness Ihcrclo. ~lar~itl attb ~ale ~)eeb WI'D{ COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR's ACTS Anna V. Fiore and Others Peconic Land Trust, Inc. SECTION BLOCK LOT COUNTy OR TOWN RETURN BY MAIL TO: Edward p. Sharretts, Jr., Esq. 77 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 ALL that certain plot, piece, or parcel of land, with the buildings and Improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Peconic, Town of Soulhold, County of Suffolk and Slate of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the soulherly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Rte. 25), · said point being situate the following two (2) courses and distances as measured along lhe soulherly side o1' Main Roa¢l (N.Y.S. Rte. 25) from lhe intersection of the westerly side oi~ Wells Road and tl~e southerly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Rle. 25): 1. South 40 deg. 27 min. 29 sec. West 206.55 feet, 2. South 35 deg. 19 min. 29 sec. West 820,12 feet; RUNNING thence from said point of beginning South 34 deg. 41 min. 41 sec. East along land now ar formerly Robert K. Simon and Elizabeth K. Simon, land now or formerly Elizabelh S. Mead, land now or formerly Richard Mead and Elizabeth Mead, land now or formerly Jennie Lee Pierce, land now or formerly Robert Ringold and Maureen Ringold, land now or formerly Norma Jean Mehrman, land now or formerly John R. Mehrman and Norma J. Mehrman, and land now or formerly Reverend John Agria, a distance of 2904.83 feet to land now or formerly Chester H. Skwara and Joyce M. Skwara; RUNNING thence along land now or formerly Chesler H. Skwara and Joyce M. Skwara the following four (4) courses and distances: 1. South 89 deg. 12 rain. 2. North 02 deg. 46 min. 3. Norlh 73 deg. 06 min. 4. Soulh 16 deg. 53 min. Wells Road; 09 sec. West 100.00 feet, 51 sec. West 35.86 feet, 01 sec. West 197.27 feet, 59 sec. West 175.00 feet to the nodherly side of RUNNING thence along the nodherly side of Wells Road the following lwo (2) courses and distances: 1. North 73 deg. 06 min. 2. South 55 deg. 04 min. of Richmond Creek; 01 sec. West 341.71 feet, 29 sec. West 434.00 feet to the highwater mark RUNNING thence along the hlghwater mark of Richmond Creek the following seven (7) tie-line courses and distances: 1. Nodh 44 deg. 2. Nodh 50 deg. 3. Noflh 32 deg. 4. Nodh 41 deg. 5. North 24 deg. 6. North 24 deg. 7. Nodh 15 deg. 28 min. 05 sec; West 232.51 feet, 41 min. 15 sec. West 166.58 feet, 49 min. 20 sec. West 226.46 feet, 50 min. 24 sec. West 162.60 feet, 38 min. 49 sec. West 159.79 feet, 43 min. 54 sec. West 329.08 feet, 14 min. 53 sec. West 110.76 feet to a point; Page 1 RUNNING thence North 72 deg. 14 min. 31 sec. West across Richmond Creek a distance of 38.89 feet to Reserved Area "D", Subdivision Map "Richmond Shores at Peconic" filed in the Office of the Clerk of Suffolk Counly os File Number 6873; RUNNING thence along Reserve Area "D", Subdivision Map "Richmond Shores at Peconic" the following three (3) courses and distances: 1. Nodh 30 deg. 05 min. 21 sec, West 115.00 feet, 2. Nodh 49 deg. 16 min. 59 sec. East 326. 10 feet, 3. Nodh 27 deg, 41 rain, 01 sec. West 521.50 feet to land now or formerly James C. McBurnie III and Joze McBurnie; RUNNING thence Nodh 27 deg. 13 min. 11 sec. West along land now or formerly James C. McBurnle III and Joze McBurnie a distance of 252.35 feet to tile southerly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Rte. 25); RUNNING thence Nodh 35 deg. 19 min. 29 sec. East along the southerly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Rte. 25) a distance of 22.54 feet to land now or formerly Thomas P. Grattan and Dale E. Grattan; RUNNING thence along land now or formerly Thomas P. Grattan and Dale E. Grattan the following three (3) courses and distances: 1. Soulh 27 deg. 13 rain. 11 sec. East 146.00 feet, 2. North 43 deg. 02 min. 09 sec. East 146.85 feet, 3. North 34 deg. 30 min. 51 sec. West 159.00 feet to the southerly side of Main Road ( N.Y.S. Rte. 25); RUNNING thence Nodh 35 deg. 19 min. 29 sec. East along the southerly side af Main Road (N.Y.S. Rte. 25) a distance of 419.23 feet to land now or formerly Robert K. Simon and Elizabeth K. Simon and the point or place of BEGINNING. CONTAINING an area of 49.5494 acres. Page 2 FROM : 25 1999 02:14PM PECONIC LAND TRUST 296 Hampton Rd · P.O. Box 1776 Southampton, NY 11969 516-283-3195 ·Fax: 516-204-0711 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE: FROM: TO: RE: May 25, 1999 Rue Lapides Melissa and Murtha Richmond Creek Farms FAX NO: 7654823 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER $~q~.ET: 1 MESSAGE: Just want you to know that the mnp on the 3 lot snbdivi.~ion has been filed (as of May 18, 1999) and I will deliver two of them to your office as soon as the certified copies come back. MAY 2 6 1999 Southold Town Planning Board Date: Submission Without a Co~er Letter Sender: Subject: SCTMO: 1000- APR 2,$19~} Southold Town Planning Board BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEOPGE RITCHIE LA THAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 20, 1999 Rae Lapides Peconic Land Trust P.O. Box 1776 Southampton, New York 11969 RE: Richmond Creek Farms, Section 1 Approved Minor Subdivision SCTM# 1000-86-1-9 (a.k.a. 86-1-9.1, 9.2 & 9.3) Dear Ms. Lapides: On April 15, 1999, you submitted one (1) mylar map of the Richmond Creek Farms, Section 1 subdivision with a request for the Planning Board Chairman to re-endorse the subdivision. The original subdivision, Richmond Creek Farms Section 1, map dated February 26, 1998, was approved by the Planning Board on April 6, 1998, and was endorsed by the Planning Board Chairman on the same date. Richmond Creek Farms, Section 1, was not flied in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office since it was understood that upon the Planning Board's approval of Richmond Creek Farms, Section 2, both Sections 1 and 2 would be simultaneously filed in the County Clerk's Office. As you know, Richmond Creek Farms, Section 2, was approved by the Planning Board, and endorsed by the Chairman on April 5, 1999. At the Planning Board's April 19, 1999, work session, the Planning Board re-endorsed the mylar for Richmond Creek Farms, Section 1, in order for the mylar to be filed in the County Clerk's Office. The map, dated February 26, 1998, is the same map as was originally endorsed by the Planning Board Chairman on April 6, 1998, and contains an updated approval (March 25, 1999) from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The mylar must be picked up at the Planning Office. Please submit two (2) paper copies of the endorsed map for the Planning Board's records. If you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact me. Since~rely~ Melissa Spiro ~ Senior Planner Submission Without a Cover Letter S~bje~t: i~ic. hm~ Grct~- Stol SCTM$: 1000- ~- I-~ Comments: Southold Town Planning Board Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SCT~I#: 1000- Date: ~l~lq~' Comments: - ~zoeo. oo Pt APR 7 1998 Southo!d Town Planning Board CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT--THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLy. THI~ INDENTURE, made the BE"I'WF_~N day of , nineteen hundred und ninety eight PECONIC LAND TRUST, INCORPORATED, a New York not for profit corporation having an office at 296 Hampton Road, Southampton, New York 11969, partyofthefirst Part, and Chester H. Skwara and Joyce M. Skwara party of the second part, WITNF..SSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars paid by the party of the second part, does hereby remise, release and quitclaim unto tile party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, Ail that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and beingj~c14~ at Peconic, Town of Southold, county of Suffolk and State of New York, further described in the attached Schedule A. Being and intended to be a portion of the premises conveyed to'the Grantor herein by deed dated November 25, 1997,recorded on December 9, 1997 in Liber 11866 Page 747. TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Sectioo 13 of the Lien Law, hereby covenants that the party of the first part wilt receive the consideration for this conveyance and will bold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the mprovement an,l will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNF,.~ WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. Jane Iselin,,~ , . Secretary Timothy J. Caufield Peconic Land Trust 296 Hampton Road Southampton, NY 11969 Dear Mr. Caufield: This comes to notify you and your Board of Directors that we are in reciept of the quit claim deed which you have prepared with regard to the deed discrepancy on the southerly section of the farmland parcel known as SCTM# 1000-86-1-9. Sincerely, Chet Skwara Sender: Subject: SCTM#: l O00- Comments: Submission Without a Cover Letter APR $1998 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Richmond Creek Farms SCTM # 1000-86-1-9, Lot//2 March 23, 1998 26 Lotowana Lane Stony Brook, NY 11790 Southold Town Planning Board This land, together with the remaining land to the north of it, extending to the terminal end of Richmond Creek, can best be described as the most ecologically significant, fragile and sensitive tidal wetland of Richmond Creek and perhal~ of the entire North Fork. Owing to its rugged configuration, narrow, shallow in spots, and densely wooded and undeveloped, it is virtually free of power boating, thereby making it a quiet and serene wildlife and bird sanctuary. To those who may not be aware of it, I can personally verify the existence of many rare and endangered species which thrive there. To namc a few: A largc resident colony of Belted Kingfisher which may be seen frequently anywhere in thc creek, but do their nesting and reproduction deep in that sanctuary at thc north end. Other species observed there are: several species of plover, Snipe and Woodcock, Black Skimmers, Black and Yellow Crowned Night herons, Green Backed Herons, Great Blue Herons, Snowy Egrets, Great American Egrets, and many species of medium to small wading shore birds, yellow legs, Dowitchers, etc. In addition, there are a significant number of predatory hawks and falcons, such as the Kestrel, the Merlin, the Peregrine and the No,hem Harrier, Hawks, such as the Red-tailed, Coopers, and Broad-Winged. There are also occasional Ring-Necked Pheasants, coveys of quail, Mallard ducks, Buffehead, Geese, Loons and many other species of waterfowl. Muskrat, Red Fox, white-tailed deer and many species of song birds nest and reproduce in that sanctuary, some common, some rare or unusual, some migratory and some resident. As for the effect that more housing will have on the quality of marine shellfish, finfish and plant life, there is no reasonable argument that may be made in its defense. Down, through the years, residents of creek front homes have seen water quality deteriorate to thc point where shellfishing has been banned. In my view, the cause has been overdevelopment, plain and simple. Some degradation of wildlife has affcady occurred. In my opinion, this was caused by the construction of large homes at the foot of Spring Lane. This building process was unusually loud, disruptive and prolonged. What was once a solid wall of beautiful, tall evergreens on that peninsula is now a skimpy scattering of trees dominated by obtrusively large and awkwardly sited housing there, ff an agreement to preserve the pines was made, it, apparently has failed. A commensurate loss of habitat and wildlife is the result. In my opinion, the outcome of the proposed development of Lot g2 will be far more serious, because it is in the very hcart of the sanctuary I have described. While most conservative minded residents reco~c, niT~: thc importance of the wildlife sanctuary here, the value of the productive nature of the marine environment cannot bc overstated. It is a natural spawning nursery for a wide range of finfish, from bottom feeding food fish, such as: flounder, fluke, eel, porgy, etc., to species such as Striped Bass, Weakfish, Bluefish and others. In view of worldwide recognition of thc depletion of fisheries thc world over, thc value of this natural spawning estuary takes on special significance, and we should be willing to do whatever it takes to protect it. The best solution imaginable, of course, would be for thc state, which has been so generous with thc costly and troublesome mandates it has imposed on us, to do something beneficial for the East End, by funding a total acquisition of thc entire creekfront properties on the northern end to preserve forever this precious habitat. Failing that, I propose that a full environmental impact study be made on this proposal. Were that to happen, I think a negative result would be likely. At the very least, thc buffer zone should be increased from a meaningless 75 feet to 200 feet or something more reasonable,for thc survival of thc sanctuary and thc marine environment. Paul G-roben 3705 Wells Road Peconic, NY PLANNING BOARD 1VIEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 March 17, 1998 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Julie G. Tiska, Project Assistant Peconic Land Trust P.O. Box 2088 Southampton, NY 11969 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for Richmond Creek Farms SCTM# 1000-86-1-9 Dear Ms. Tiska: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, March 16, 1998: BE IT RESOLVED to hold the hearing Open until final maps with Health Department approval are submitted. The next Planning Board meeting is scheduled for Monday, April 6, 1998. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, (~na~fmtta nO rl°wskl, J r · AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as Richmond Creek Farms by placing the Town's official poster notices(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on March 16 1998, I have sent notices, by certified mail, the receipts of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the above mentioned property on March 6 1998. Julie G. Tiska Your name (print) Si~ature Peconic Land Trust, Incorporated PO Box 2088, Southampton, NY 11969 Address Date No~r~ Pm~l~. a. Boumnm, Notary Public, State of New York No. 52-4837200 Qualified in Suffolk Cou~ Corem ~s on Ex, ires April 30. 19-.J_J HAR 1 8 PLEASE RETURN TIllS AFFIDA ~¢T AND CERTIFIED MAll RECEIPTS ON THE DAY OF. 01? AT THE PUBliC ttEA~INO Re: SCTM#: Date of Hearing: PECONIC LAND TRUST 296 Hampton Road, PO. Box 2088, Southampton, P 111 067 871 /ooo - ~, -/-/o,~ Mr. Robert Ringold ~ ,~a 110 McCann Lane Greenport, NY 11944 LAND TRUST ~..~ ~'~/~96~ blampto'~.~.~..,,~l~3. Box2088, Southampton, NY P 111 067 844 B l~ Fmmm Re~¢~ .- - ......... -'r- GoMult pos~n~t~r lor fee. t~ ~ ! -- Oonsutt postrna~r ~:YHee ~nd M " ~d) ~ .d M ~s p~dd) "* pS F(xm ~811, Decembm 1;e4 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ss: PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 16th day of March, 1998 on the question of the fol- lowing: 7:35 P.M. Public hearing for the proposed minor subdivision lbr Richmond Creek Farm, in Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suflblk, State of New Yorl~. Suttblk County Tax Map Number 1000-86- I-9. The property is bordered on the north by Main Road and by land now or lbrmerly orTho,nas P. Grattan and Dale E. Grattan; on the northcast by land now ,ir formerly of Robert K. Simon and Elizabeth K. Simon; on the southeast by land now or tbr- merly of Elizabeth S. Mead, by land now or formerly of Richard Mead and Elizabeth Mead, by land now or formerly of Jennie Lee Pierce, by land now or for- merly of Robert Ringold and Maureen Ringold; by land now or formerly of Norma Jean Mehrman, by land now or for- merly of John R. Mehrman and Norma J. Mehrman, and by land now or tbrmerly of John Agria; on the south by land now or for- merly of Chester H. Skwara and Joyce M. Skwara and Wells Road; on the southwest by Rich- mond Creek; and on the north- west by land now or formerly of REC Realty Co., and by land now or formerly of James C. McBurnie Ill and Joze McBumie. Dated: March 5, 1998 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman 1X-3/12/98(50) Patricia C. Lollot, being duly sworn, says that she is the Production Coordinator, of the TRAV- ELER WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the no- tice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Traveler Watchman once each week for / ......... · .............................................................. weeks - rd dav cfi.,?. ............ .../~/....'~....~'......~.. ....................... ,1 9.~..¥ ::~7.?.:;...: .................. Sworn to before me this ........................... day of ....................................................................... Notary Public BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER NOTARY PUBUC, State of New York No, 4806846 ~ualified i n S u~lolk Cou_nj~ / Commi~ion Expire~ ,~/3///r~ HAR 1 Southold Town Plannin,q Board Notice to Adiacent Properb/Owners You are hereby given notice: I. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a minor subdivision 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: Proposed minor subdivision for Richmond Creek Farms, SCTM#I000-86-I-9, located on the south side of Main Rd. and the north side of Wells Rd. in Peconic. 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the R-80 zone. 4. That the application is for Section I of a 4 lot minor subdivision. Section I is for 2 lots. Lot number I contains 41.2849 acres of land on which the Town has purchased the development rights on 37.2849 acres. Lot number 2 contains 7.9242 acres which will be further sub- divided into a total of three 2 acres lots. (See enclosed map.) That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board office at (516) 765-1938. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, March 16 1998 at 7:35 p.m. in the meeting hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Rd., Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owners Name(s): Date: Notice of Hearing A public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board at Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property' OWNER(S) OF RECORD: Richmond Creek Farms NAME OF APPLICATION: Minor subdivision for Richmond Creek Farms REFERENCE/TAX MAP #: 1000-86-1-9 SUBJECT OF HEARING: The application is for Section I of a 4 lot minor subdivision. Section I is for 2 lots. Lot number I contains 4'12849 acres of land on which the Town has purchased the development rights on 37,2849 acres, Lot number 2 contains 7.9242 acres which will be further subdivided into a total of three 2 acres lots, TIME & DATE HEARING: Monday, March 16, 1998 at 7:35 p.m. If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection prior to the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. PLANNING BOARD -~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD M~MBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 March 5, 1998 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Julie G. Tiska, Project Assistant Peconic Land Trust P.O. Box 2088 Southampton, NY 11969 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for Richmond Creek Farms SCTM# 1000-86-1 ~9 Dear Ms. Tiska: The Southold Town Planning Board has set Monday, March 16, 1998 at 7:35 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated February 26, 1998. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The sign and notification form are enclosed for your use. Please return the endorsed Affidavit of Posting and the si,qned ¢lreen return receipts from the certified mailings on the day of, or at the public hearing. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely,/~. ~. Melissa Spiro Planner enc. PECONIC LAND TRUST 296 Hampton Road, PO. Box 2088, Southampton, NY 11969 (516) 283-3195 Fax: (516) 283-0235 February 27, 1998 Melissa Spiro Southold Town Planning Department Town Hall, 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Section 1 of Richmond Creek Farms Minor Subdivision; SCTM: 1000-86-1-9 Dear Melissa: Pursuant to our telephone conversation of February 20, please put the above referenced project on the agenda for a public hearing on March 16. We will provide you with copies of the 2 lot subdivision map by March 6 in order to provide ample time for publishing the hearing notice in the newspaper, posting the property and notifying the neighbors. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Julie G. Tiska Project Assistant IlAR 1998 Southold Town Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chair~nan WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCI-IIE LATHAM, JR. RICIg_ARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 January 27,1998 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tim Caufield Peconic Land Trust P.O. Box 2088 Southampton, NY 11969 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for Peconic Land Trust, Inc. (Richmond Creek) SCTM# 1000-86-1-9 Dear Mr. Caufield: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board held on Monday, January 26, 1998: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. PLANNING BOARD M~EMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS IfENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant January26,1998 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed minor subdivision for Peconic Land Trust (Richmond Creek) SCTM#: 1000-86-1-9 Location: south side Main Rd & north side of Wells Rd. in Peconic SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This minor subdivision is for 4 lots on 49.5494 acres, Lot number 4 contains 37.63 acres of land on which the Town has purchased the development rights. Page 2 SEQR Negative Declaration -Peconic Land Trust January 26, 1998 Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The Planning Board has received correspondence from the Town Trustees stating that the Trustees have no objection to the proposed subdivision. The Trustees noted that Trustee jurisdiction extends 75' landward of the Tidal wetlands. Building envelopes for the proposed subdivision are shown as being 75' landward of the tidal wetland. The proposed project is consistent with land use in the surrounding area and lot sizes are equal to or greater than lots in the surrounding neighborhood. Subsoils are conducive to sanitary and drainage leaching facilities as evidenced by the on site test holes. There is no significant erosion potential expected as a result of development. The Planning Board has received correspondence from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. That agency had no objection to the PIanning Board assuming lead agency as the anticipated impacts are primarily of local significance. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required relevant permits. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (51~) 765-1938 cc: John P. Cahill, DEC Albany Roger Evans, DEC Stony Brook Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Water Authority Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Southold Town Building Dept. Southotd Town Trustees Applicant SOUTHOLD FIRE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 908, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 January 20, 1998 Chairman Bennett Odowski, Jr. Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Land Trust, 1000-86-1-9 Dear Ben: The Southold Fire Distdct has reviewed the above mentioned map and has found that there is adequate fire protection at this time. This decision is valid for one year from the date of this letter. Sincerely, Cynthia Capdse District Secretary SOUTHOLD .... PLANNING New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Telephone (516) ~.~.~.-0365 Facsimile (516) ~-~-~-0360 SEOR COORDINATION RESPONSE January 6, 1998 John P. CahKI Commissioner Planning Board Office Town of $outhold Town Hall, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Re:Peconic Land Trust Inc. Richmond Creek Farms, 42~00 Main Road, 8CTM# ~000-85-1-9 Southold Dear Mr. Orlowski: An initial review by Department staff indicates that the NYSDEC is an involved agency as defined in SEQR (6 NYCRR Part 617) due to Article 25 Tidal Wetlands jurisdiction. However, as of this writing, no application has been received by DEC for this subdivision. An application packet has been sent to the sponsor with a copy of this letter. Please be advised the DEC has no objection your agency or another agency assuming lead agency for this action as the anticipated impacts are primarily of local significance. DEC reserves the right to comment if a positive determination of significance is made. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (516) 444-0403 for further information or discussion. Sincerely; Kevin Kispert Environmental Analyst I cc: Peconic Land Trust Inc. PLANNING BOARD M~EMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSK/, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS tfENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCFIIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Januaw 6,1998 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tim Caufield Peconic Land Trust P.O. Box 2088 Southampton, NY 11969 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for Peconic Land Trust, Inc," SCTM# 1000-86-1-9 Dear Mr. Caufield: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board held on Monday, January 5, 1998: WHEREAS, the proposed minor subdivision before the Planning Board is to divide the 49.5494 acre parcel into four (4) lots; and WHEREAS, Lots 1, 2 and 3 are 2+ acres in area as shown on the proposed subdivision plan, and Lot 4 is 41.2849 acres in area, on which the Town of Southold has purchased the development rights on 37.2849 acres; be it therefore, RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. The SEQRA determin~tinn h~s been scheduled for the Planning Board's January 26, 1998 meeting,S. Be it further RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated December 15, 1997, with the following c~r]ditions: 1. Covenants and Restrictions shall be placed on proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3, stating that there is to be a seventy-five (75) foot wide wetland buffer area adjacent to the wetland area. Grading within this area shall be prohibited and clearing and cutting shall be limited to that necessary for proper maintenance and removal of diseased, decayed or dead material and obnoxious plant species. Page 2 Proposed minor subdivision for Peconic Land Trust, Inc. Janua~/6, 1998 Lots 2 and 3 shall be accessed by a common driveway, as indicated on the proposed subdivision plan. The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions shall provide for an access agreement and maintenance agreement for the two lots. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The final maps, six (6) paper prints and two (2) mylars must contain a current stamp of Health Department approval and must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. The sketch plan has been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission and the Town Trustees for review. You will be notified when the Planning Board receives reports from these agencies. The sketch plans have been referred to the Southold Fire Department for their recommendation as to whether a firewell is necessary for fire protection. You will be notified if a firewell is required. The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that it is inadequate in size for a reservation of land for park and playground use. Therefore, a cash payment in lieu of land reservation will be required as per Section A106-38 (e) of the Town Code. The amount to be deposited with the Town Board shall be $6000.00 (two thousand dollars per vacant lot in the subdivision.) Payment is required prior to any final endorsement of the subdivision. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sinc~erely, ,, · ,, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Albert J. Krupski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President Jim King Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Melissa Spiro, Planner A1 Krupski, Trustee Peconic Land Trust, Inc. SCTM 91000-86-1-9 January 2, 1998 The above application is within the jurisdiction of the Southold Town Board of Trustees by virtue of Chapter 97, Wetlands in the Town Code. The Boards' jurisdiction extends 75' landward of the Tidal wetlands, as defined in the code and determined in the field. The Board has no objection to this proposed subdivision, but still maintain s jurisdiction over any activity within 75' of tidal wetlands, to be determined by a field inspection of this board before any "activity" is conducted. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK January 2, 1998 S3]EPHEN Iq. JONES, A.I.C.P, Mr. Richard C. Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Plat Name: Tax Map No.: SCDP File No.: Dear Mr. Ward: Peconic Land Trust Inc. 1000-86-01-09 S-SD-98-01 Pursuant to the requirements of Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the above captioned proposed final plat which has been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Comments: This local determination is rendered with the understanding that prior to the granting of final approval the map shall be revised pursuant to the following: 1. The title block to be revised pursuant to chapter 5 (Requirements of Notice 2.b.[1]). The name of the proposed minor subdivision (i.e.: Peconic Land Trust, Inc.) is similar enough to map titles previously submitted by Southold Town to warrant the name to be changed. Commission staff recommends something to the effect "Minor Subdivision of Richmond Creek Farms." Panhandle lots (flag lots) should not be created where the length of the panhandle is greater than 300. Excessive driveway length may cause difficulty for emergency equipment attempting to reach the main portion of the parcel. The configuration of lot 3 should be reconsidered. The "Landward limit of tidal wetlands" as indicated on the submitted map should be verified by Town conservation or State conservation biologists and indicated on the map as to the verifying agency and date. 220 RABRO DRIVE · P.O. BOX 6100 · HAUPPAUG[, LONG ISLAND, NY 117880099 · (516} 853-5190 · FAX (516) 8534044 Page: 2 January 2, 1998 5. No new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility should be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of the wetlands bordering the parcel. 6. No stormwater runoff resulting fi.om the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots should be discharged into wetlands bordering the parcel. Appropriate steps should be taken to ensure the agricultural reserve area shown on this map remains undeveloped except for those agricultural related structures which are permitted by Town Law. Deed restrictions and covenants should be placed on the agricultural reserve so as to limit any residential structures and also to advise future residents that the agricultural reserve exists and that those lots may be subject to the noise and fugitive dust normally associated with agricultural activities. All prospective owners of lots within this subdivision should be advised that their lots are located adjacent to an agricultural reserve and those lots may be subject to the noise and fugitive dust normally associated with agricultural activities. The final map should bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office which affects lots in this subdivision. 8. The deed description discrepancy for the southeast comer of the subject parcel should be resolved prior to final approval. The map of this minor subdivision should be filed in the office of the County Clerk. This is to insure the validity of the subdivision map and that the subdivision map will be available to the general public in a central office of official records. 10. The Commission also notes the timing of the referral (Dated Dec. 30, 1997, received Dec. 31, 1997) and the intent of the Southold Planning Board to render a decision at the January 5, 1998 meeting. Please be advised that actions subject to Suffolk County Planning Commission review which are taken without referral to and action by the Suffolk County Planning Commission are procedurally defective. A procedural defect may render a development project null and void and could invalidate the use and occupancy of the site and adversely affect the owners interest therein. Sincerely, Stephen M. Jones, AICP Director of Planning ~ ~, ~ ~ ~) Principal Planner APF:cc PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS E~ENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairn~an WILLIAM J. CREMERS K~NNETYI L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICI-L~,RD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 ~fain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southo]d. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (5]-6~ 765-1935 December 30, 1997 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Cyn[his Caprise, Secretary Orient Fire District 23300 Main Rd, Orient, NY 11944 Dear Ms. Caprise: Enclosed please find one (1) survey dated SCTM# 1000- 86~-I-~] ~_c. hSj I997, for The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fire- wells are needed. Please specify whether firewetls are shallow or electric. The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recom- mendation at. to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Please reply by cooperation. 3~n.2o 1997, Thank you for your Sincerely, E)ennett Orlowski, Jr, Chairman eno. PLANNING BOARD M~EMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KJ~NNETYI L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, RICI-IARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fmx (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County Planning Commission H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veteran's Memodal Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: S.C.D.P.W. Topo No.: S.C. Tax Map No.: 1000- ~ Major Sub. Minor Sub. Hamlet/Locality ~"e.c ~ ~ ,' ~ Zoning "~,- ~ · Site Plan Cluster Lot Line Change MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Preliminary Plat (3 copies) /% Road Profiles (1).__ Drainage Plans (1) Topographical Map (1)~ Site Plan (1)__ Grading Plan (1) Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet Page 2 Southold Town Planning Board Referral Referral Criteria: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an ("X) Unlisted Action ( ) Type I Action ( ) Type II Action 2. A ( ) Negative Declaration ( ) Positive Declaration ( ) Determination of Non-significance has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. ( ) Yes ('X) No 4. The proposed division has received approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health. ( )Yes (/-)No Comments: ~ ~ . W~ request~cknowledgement of receipt of this mfeffal ( ) Yes ( )No Referral received Commission and assigned File No. 1997 by the Suffolk County Planning Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~/ .~ Chairman cc: Lydia Tortora rev. 6/94 Cornell . Cooperative Extension SuffolkCounty Suffolk County Marine Environmental Learning Center 3690 Cedar Beach Road Southold, NY 11971 516-852~660 FAX 516-852-8662 Melissa Spiro December 19, 1997 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Peconic Land Trust Peconic, New York; SCTM No. 1000-86-1-9 Dear Melissa: As per our discussion, I have reviewed the Full EAF and the subdivision sketch plan completed by the project applicant. At this time I have completed the following work with regard to this project. 1. Review of Full EAF The Full EAF submitted by the project applicant has been reviewed against two field inspections and the proposed project plan. I find this document to be accurate and complete. 2. Field Inspection and Project Review I inspected the subject site on December 16 & 17, 1997. The subject site is a large agricultural tract, 49.55 acres in size, located southeast of Main Road in Peconic, west of Wells Road and fronting the western tributary of Richmond Creek to the southwest. The site includes several existing structures including a house, two barns and a garage clustered in the north. This parcel is bordered by a sod field and residential housing to the northeast and south and residential housing and Richmond Creek to the southwest. A narrow wetland fringe extends along the entire frontage on Richmond Creek. The existing house and structures are clustered at the north end of the site. This area is proposed to be part of the future 4.00 acre development area fronting Main Road. Southeast of this area is the proposed 37.6252 acre non-development area extending to Wells Road at the south end. The southern comer of the site fronting Richmond Creek is an area of 7.9242 acres proposed to be subdivided into three lots. Proposed lots would be (#3) 2.4087 acres, (#2) 2.6229 acres and (#1) 2.8926 acres from north to south. The northernmost lot would have 322.4 feet of frontage followed by 393 feet and 232.5 feet for the second and first lots, respectively. Each lot would range from 247 to 434 feet deep. Lots are proposed to be serviced by individual wells and onsite sanitary systems. Access to the lots would be from Wells Road near its terminus at Richmond Creek. Helping You Put Knowledge to Work Cornell Cooperative Extension provides equal program and employment opportunities NYS College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, NYS College of Human Ecology, and NYS College of Veterinary Medc ne at Cornell University, Coopera ve Extension associations, county governing bodies, and U.S. Department of Agriculture, cooperating. Inspection of the parcel finds several vegetation cover types. The most extensive vegetation type is agricultural. This type encompasses all of the future development area fronting Main Road, the majority of the proposed non-development area and part of the minor subdivision. The second most predominant cover type includes disturbed upland/shrub including most of the area immediately landward of the wetland fringe up to the edge of the existing farm field. This area is littered with brush from the cutting of black locust trees which are the dominant tree between the wetland and farm field. A narrow band of mature oaks and cedars occupies much of the area landward of the wetland boundary within lot 1 and a small portion of lot 2. Estuarine tidal marsh fringes the entire frontage of the proposed subdivision area. Width of the marsh varies from 50 to 100 feet. In the noah, the wetland is dominated by an almost pure stand of common reed. Beginning in the subdivision area the species diversity increases including most typical marsh species. A crescent-shaped area of high quality high marsh exists at the common boundary between lots 1 and 2. An extensive area of salt shrub habitat occupies the upper wetland elevations along this frontage. The proposed project is consistent with land use in the surrounding area and lot sizes are equal to or greater than lots in the surrounding neighborhood. Subsoils are conducive to sanitary and drainage leaching facilities as evidenced by the on site test holes. There is no significant erosion potential expected as a result of development. Though wetlands fringe the entire Richmond Creek waterfront, the depth of the lots provides for adequate wetland setbacks. Proposed activities within the building envelopes would be subject to NYSDEC jurisdiction. Town of Southold Trustees jurisdiction extends 75 feet landward of the designated wetlands. It is recommended that that the area fronting each parcel 75 feet or greater from the designated wetlands remain natural and/or is enhanced through planting of native species. Establishment of this buffer area will ensure that land use does not significantly impact the wetlands. lfthe Planning Board is in agreement with the assessment provided above, I believe that the proposed project will not cause a significant adverse impact upon natural or human environmental resources. Accordingly, the Board may wish to consider the adoption of a Negative Declaration in connection with this project. Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with input on this project. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions concerning my comments. Very truly~l~//,~ j Chris Pickerell Extension Educator CORNELL COOPERATIVE EXTENSION PLANNING BOARD MI~MBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCI-IIE LATHAM, RICHARD G. WAleD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P,O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 F..x (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FR OM: RE: DATE: Albert Krupski, Jr., President Town Trustees Melissa Spiro, Planner /z¢'/_~' Proposed Minor Subdivision for Peconic Land Trust, Inc. South side Main Road, North side Wells Road SCTM# 1000-86-1-9 December 19, 1997 Attached please find the Planning Board's Lead Agency Coordination Request and the map dated December 15, 1997, for the above mentioned subdivision. The Town has purchased the development rights on 37. 2849 acres of 49.5 acre parcel. As shown on the map, the density on the total parcel has been reduced to 3 proposed lots. Lot 4 contains an existing single-family residence. The Planning Board requests your review of the wetland delineation. If all is in order, the Planning Board plans to proceed with the SEQRA determination at the Board's January 26, 1998, meeting. Please forwsr~_ your comments prior to that date. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (FAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: f'~:~,~ c.~&~,~,o~-~o~ ~-~¢o~ (~,~.'T'rv6r~ ~-~c. Requested Action: H I~ ~,~ ~u~%,~ ~ ~9.~q SEQ~ Classifi~tion: ( ) Type I ~) Unlisted Contact Person: ~ '~p (516) 765-1938 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (~4) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. c/ -~ Chairman cc: ~ Board of Trustees Southold Town Board ,'-Suffolk County Department of Health Services · ~ NYSDEC - Stony Brook '~ NYSDEC - Albany *Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 PECONI~LAND TRUST 296 Hampton Road, PO. Box 2088, Southampton, NY 11969 (516) 283-3195 Fax: (516) 283-0235 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Richmond Creek Farms Minor Subdivision; SCTM: 1000-86-1-9 Dear Melissa: December 19, 1997 Enclosed please find the following materials submitted for your review for the above referenced minor subdivision: 1. One completed and signed Application for Approval of Plat 2. One completed and signed Questionnaire Form with attached Certificates of Occupancy 3. One completed and signed Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form 4. One completed and signed EAF Part 1 5. A check in the amount of $2,500 to cover the application and inspection fees 6. Legal Description of Property (Deed) 7. Copy of Tax Map showing subject property 8. Environmental Review Report prepared by Chris Pickerell (This will be submitted by Chris Pickerell on 12/22/97) 9. Form letter regarding drainage, grading and road construction 10. Signed Affidavit of Ownership 11. Twelve (12) Surveys The above referenced property is located in an R-80 zone and therefore had a potential density of approximately 24 lots. The Peconic Land Trust was able to purchase the property and subsequently sold the development rights on 37.63 acres of farmland to the Town of Southold. The density has been reduced to a total of four home sites, one of which is a Pre-existing residence with barns on proposed lot 4. Thus, where there could have been a total of 25 homes there will now only be 4 at the most. We are aware that a deed discrepancy exists regarding a portion of the property located in the southeast comer of the parcel. We currently in the process of addressing this problem. As well, we also note that an adjacent owner's fence encroaches on our property. We have contacted the neighbor and are working towards resolving this matter. Should you require any additional information or have any questions please do not hesitate to contact Tim Caufield or myself at 283-3195. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Julie G. Tiska Project Assistant eBcs. JUDITH T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK Town of Southold Southold, New York 11971 Phone: 516-765-1800 RECEIVED OF: ~~ CASH .Em.T 6 6 2 0 8 DATE ~,~ ELIZABETHTownA. NEVILLE,of SoutholdTOWN CLERK RECEIPT 6 8 8 4 9 ~ Southold, New York 11971 ~ Phone:516-765-1800 DATE~"~;;Z'/~', ~ 19 ~',~ RECEIVED OF: _~.,~ _~'~-~c.¢.,.~ ~.-,~t~.-~ $ ~ ~. ~ pECON WELLS ROAD now or fOrmerly Thomas p. Crottan Dale E. Grattan LOCATION MAP 3,0' 13.0' 3.0' 11.0' 3,0' 12.0' 2.4' now or formerly Robert K. Simon &: Elizabeth K, Simon DEVELOPMENT AREA Area = 4.0000 Acres _ S 34'41'41" E EDGE OF CULTIVATED FIELD 106 + 115 + 128 + d~Z fOrmerly.~ C. MCBurdie doze McBurnie \ Subdivision dow or f - ~-J ,,ealty CO.` . -_ R~chmond S~ore~' At ?uff. 0o, File No. 6875 + 8,5 115.00' N 30'05'21" W 98 + Lot 4 Total Area=41,6252 NON-DEVELOPMENT AREA ............. TO BE_CON~VEYED TO ............... ~h~-=T'b-~N Of SOU]HOLD Area = .37.6252 Acres 10.6 + CULTIVATED FIELD 12.5 T.H NO 2 '.,~ 93 + ~ EAR~I ROAD now or formerly Jennie Lee Pierce 2904.83' 2253.11' EDGE OF CULTIVATED FIELD 106 + 10,7 Lot 5 I I I ~c~ ~ I ' PROPERTY UNE /A~S D[~SCRIBE5 iN~ DEED TO CHESTER H. SKW~R~ & JOYCE M. SKWARA LIBER 6508 CP. 503 DATED FEB, 7, 1968 PROPERTY LINE AS DESCRIBED IN DEED - 12 . ANN FIORE, ET, AL UBER 7444 CP 385 -D.A_TED JUNE 6, 1973 10+2 ', TH NO 3\ \ Lot'2-. ~ \ =2.6229 Ac. , ' ......... -.- L.,,~.._ -- I I + 61 SCAT~RED BRUSH & ~' 226.46' 32'49'20" W Lot 1 I Areal=2.8926 Ac. DWARD LIMIT OF TIDAL RicHMOND CREEK Young & Young, Land Surveyors SITE DATA: 1. TOTAL AREA ---- 49,5494 ACRES 2. TOTAL NO. OF LOTS -- 4 3. ZONING USE DIS~ICT: R-80 NOTES: L · --- MONUMENT FOUND, ~ = PIPE FOUND 2. MONtTOR WELLS NOT SHOWN HEREON. 5. -0- = U¥1UTY POLE SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN PREPARED FOR: PECONIC LAND TRUST, INC. At: PECONIC Town of: SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York 1000 86 1 9 Surf. Co. Tax District Section Block DATE :OC~ 22, 1997 SCALE :1"=100' JOB NO, :96 - 0883 SHEET NO.:1 OF 1 (960883SP.DWG) now or Thomas p. Gratton Dale E. Gratten ROAD TYPICAL PLOT PLAN IEST ROlE NO. 1 11.0' G,W, THE WATer SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN ~HIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH THe STANDARDS AND REQUIRE- MENTS Of I]4E SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPAR~ENT OF HEALTH AT THE TIME OE CONS I]~UCTION. ~HOMAS C. WOLPERT. PE. N.Y.S. LIO NO, 01495 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH HAUPPAUOE, N.Y. TEST HOLE NO. 2 'lEST HOle NO. 3 DATE SERVICES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE PROPOSED REALTY SUBDIVISION OR DEVELOPMENT WlTH A TOTAL OF LOTS WAS APPROVED ON THE ABOVE DATE, WATER SUPPLIES AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES MUST CONFORM TO CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT The TIME OF CONSTRUCTION AND ARE SUBdECT TO SEPARATE PERMITS PURSUANT TO THOSE STANDARDS. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID ONLY IF The REALTY SUBDIVISiON/DEVELOPMENT MAP IS DULY FILED W]TH THE COUNTY CLERK WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THIS DATE. CONSENT IS HEREBY GIVEN FOR The FILING OF THIS MAP ON WHICH TH~S ENDORSEMENT APPEARS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF The PUBLIC HEALth LAW AND The SUFFOLK COUNTY SANITARY CODE. JOSEPH H, BALER, P.E, DIRECTOR, DIVfS[ON OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 3.0' 3.0' SAND & GRAVEL SAND & GRAVEL lO8 S 34'41'41" E DEVI~LOPMENT AREA AreG-= 4.0000 Acres s ~ formerly..'. & OOze MCBurnie" \ SubdivPjidn LOCATION MAP SCALE' 1"=600' 122 Robert K. now or formerly Simon & Elizabeth 122 128 + K, Simon '/ _ _ / o / now or formerly ~. o: c Jennie Lee ~ierce o.~ ~ /,. ,. ,' / ~ o ~ 290~.83' + .. / now or'formerly / now or formerly / Normo J, Mehrman WOODS N 30'05'21% W.. ......... EDGE OF CULTIVATED FIELD 5.a . .............................. PROPERTY LINE' ~4S DESCR~BE[~"h DEED TO .............................................. -- CHESTER H. SKWAR~-'& JOYCE '- UBER 6308 CP. 503 DATED FEB, 7. 1968 / PROPERTY UNE AS DESCRIBED IN DEED - - .............. ' ~2 ANN FlORE~ ET AL LIBER 7444 CP, 385 '-~A.TED JUNE 6, 1973 Lot 4 ,, Total Area=4%2849 ",, NON-DEVELOPMeNT AREA ,' ................. DEVELOPMENT RLG~bT~TO BE CONVEYED TO ¢--_ ................... ?he'-Th ' - ' ~02 ~ OF SOUTHOLD " + Area = 37.2849 Acres .,,' + ,~ , ~ Lo~ 1 .- ~ TH NO. ~ / / ~ Upland Area~2.0233 Ac. ',,~ / Wetland Areo~0.8693 Ac .---~ ~ Total Area~2.8926 '. ,J -~lO / Upland Area~2.2898 Ac. -.... ~ EAR~ ROAD ' Totol Area=2.4087 Ac, 226.46' ~ N ~9" W ~ N 52'49'20" W ~E LiNE ALONG APPROXIMATE ...........-"' RICHMOND CREEK ..... -._. DEli 19 ::19 ' Young & Young, Land Surveyors 516--727--2303 or formerly Rev. John Agria SITE DATA: 1. TOTAL AREA = 49,5494 ACRES 2. TOTAL NO. OF LOTS = 4 .... " 3. ZONING USE DISTRICT: R-BO ~ NOTES: 1, · = MONUMENT FOUND, ~ = PIPE FOUND I 2. MONITOR WELLS NOT SHOWN HEREON, "1 HEREBY CER~FY THAT ALL LOTS SHOWN ON THIS PlaT COMPLY ~TH THE BUILDING ZONE ORDNANCE OF~E TOWN OF SOU]HOLD, KENNETH F, ABRUZZO, L.S.N.Y.S, LIC, NO. 49999 "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MACE BY ACTdAL SURVEYS COMPLETED DECEMBER 15, 1997 AND THAT ALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS: · ACTUALLY EXIST AND ]Heir POSITIONS ARE CORRECFLY SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS ARE CORRECT." KENNETH F ABRUZZO, L S N.Y.S. LIC, NO, 49999 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY The PLANNING BOARD OF SOUTHOLD, DATE OF APPROVAL CHAIRMAN (TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD) ]he APPROVAL Of THIS MAp DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THe ACCEPTANCE OF HIGHWAYS SHOWN THEREON AS PUBLIC ROADS. A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICllONS HAS BEEN FILED IN ]He SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE IN LIBER.__CP__ SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN PREPARED FOR: PECONIC LAND TRUST, Ab PECONIC Town of: Suffolk County, New York INC. SOUTHOLD Suff. Co. Tax Map: i1000I 86 I 1 , 9 ~~C, 15, 1997 :OCT. 31, 1997 DATE :OC~ 22, 1997 SCALE :1"=100' JOB NO, :96 - 0883 SHEET NO,:1 OF 1 MAP NO, 64H (960883SP,DWG) now or fOrmerly Thomas p. Grattan Dale E, GraNan LOAM LOAM GRAVEL 1%0' 0 W. SAND & 10.0' 0 W. DEVELOPMENT AREA Ared = 4-.0000 Acres + S 34'41'41" E oF cuLTIvATED F,ELD' 11.0 Z SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CASED UPON THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR THIS PROJECT, FILING OF A REALTY SUBDIVISION OR DEVELOPMENT MAP WITH THIS DEPARTMENT IS NOT REQUIRED UflDER THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE SUPTOLK COUNTY SANITARY CODE SINCE ALL PARCELS ARE RESIDENTIAL AND EACH SUBDIVIDED PARCEL IS GREATER THAN 5 ACRES IN AREA. APPLICATION MUST BE MADE FOR APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION OF WATER SUPPLY AND SANITARY FACiUTIES FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL AND STANDARDS OP THE DEPARTMENT, EFFECTIVE AT TIME OF SUBMISSION, MUST BE SASISFIED. DATE dozes C. MCBurY~ie III"%.V- McBurnie \ LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1"=600' now or formerly Robert K. Simon & Elizobeth 10.4 + + + 128 K. Simon g.5 Lot 1 ~ Totol Arco=41.2849 AC. NON-DEVELOPME~NT AREA '- ..... L ......... DEVELOPM_E_N_T_J~IG~TS CONVEYED TO ............. ~'1~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Area = 37.2849 Acres + CULTIVATED FIELD T,H+ NO. 2 12.5 9.3 + EARTH ROAD 115. N 50'05,21~,..~ -- -_:: ..... ::::::::::::::::::::::: _.,.. now or formerly Jennie Lee Pierce EDGE OF CULTIVATED FIELD + 2904.85' 1%5 OJ ~- / now or 'formerly / now or formerly ~ O~ ~ ./ Norma Jean Mehrmon John R. Mehrmon & ~/"'~ . / NoiTna J. Mehrman PROPER~ UN~ ~ D~SC~BE~ IR DEED TO CHES~R H. SKW~ ~ JOYCE M. SKWARA UBER 6308 CP. 505 DASD ~B. 7, 1968 PROPERTY UNE AS DESCRICED IN DEED ANN F~ORE, Eti AL UBER 744~ CP; 385 -~A~D JUNE 6, 1973 Young & Young, Land Surveyors or formedy Rev. John Agria 189,08' / 0,3403 Acres ~ // 10 2 + + II0 + + 11.2 + 108 SHE DATA: 1. TOTAL AREA = 4-9.5494 ACRES 2, TOTAL NO, OF LOTS = 2 3, ZONING USE DISTRICT: R-80 NOTES: 1. · -- MONUMENT FOUND, ~ = PIPE FOUND i 2. MONITOR WELLS NOT SHOWN HEREON. 3, <:> = UTIUTY POLE ¢, Z~ = STAKE SET ~ "I HERECY CER~FY THAT ALL LOTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT COMPLY WITH, THE BUILDING ZONE ORDNANCE OF THE T01~ OF SOUTHOLD. KENNETH F. ABRUZZO, LS..N.Y.S. L[~. NO. ~9099 ' I HEREBY CERTIFY ~rlAT THIS MAP WAS MADE aY ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED DECEMBER 15~ 4097 AND THAT ALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS: ~ ACTUALLY ;~XIST AND THEIR POSITIONS ARE QORRECTLY SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS ARE CORRECT;' Upland Area=6.4957 Ac. .-- ,,/' Wetlond .Area--~;4285-A¢, - Total Area=7.9242 Ac. + 226,46' N 32'49'2O" W SCAT~EREO..B~USH & TREES , . "~ ~AND .... DETERMINED - ~' ,WE~LAN~ ~.-~ yOUNG cREEK N 41 ~E LINE ALONG APpROYJMA~ RICHMOND KENNETH F. ABRUZZO, L.S. N~Y.S. LIC. NO, 49996 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPRoVED BY THE PLANNING BOARD OF SOUTHOLD. CHAIRMA~N (TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~LANNING BOARD) DATE OF APPROVAL THE APPROVAL OF THIS MAP DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE ACCEPTANCE OF HIGHWAYS SHOWN THEREON AS PUBLIC Re)ADS. ' A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS HAS BEEN FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE IN UBER CP__ MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT RICHMOND CREEK FARMS At: PECONIC Town off SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York Suff, Co. Tax Map: MAR Z 1996i $oufl~o d Towr Planning Board SCALE : 1'=100 JOB NO. :96 - SHEET NO. :1 OF I MAP NO. e~H (gsc883PLAT. DWG)