Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-85.-2-14 .- ' .I;;I r: ,. a,v .,. .4. ;', , " , .,,. -:,.y �. -:„ .. - - I .. . „ ., I:1.: ( .+.w:R•, IC3h .L.. „ ,4:,r fw ,1.1,5-• �` •97fi ,,��yy-Ys' �l { �4 1 r' , - ` 5 4017 40' 50' W. 8261.64" 2 ,r PROPERTY64T1ON: ate` Herodotus Damklnas gQdrohs, Man Road r vI Peconic, New York 11988 1 1 f Suffolk County tax,Mop s1 - 1000-85T-2-14 f ,fit h 1 4q Zonlrg+ Agriculture/Gonservatlon Proposed Use, Wnery Storage Warehouse SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA: , Site Area 96.004 acres ., Building Area. Proposed :ii 96,000 sq. ft. Site Coverage, 2195 96 , r„ k r 1 Total Planting. 34525 acres or 9b % BUILDING DATA: Usage G-4.1 Cold storage offood products y Flre Hdxard: Low 1 Construction: Type 2b Non Combustlble ppp storage Buadng I " 96000,ad. of floorarea a 1 space/ 1000 91. of building 19, 9,N % 212.00' 1 ` y " i '.� 36000/50 = 56 "ces Required = 56 spaces Provided = Land Bank 96 spores Handicap Parking = 5% x 96 = (2) space )' o H I TING ' NOTES: i EXTERIOR SItE L C o 1, Lumark Model MHWL-250MT 250 watt Metal Hollde REG . CONCRETE BLEND \\ I ( U light fixtures mounted on wall a 12' above grade TiJRN1NE' AREA o f 2. All outdoor lighting fixtures shall be shielded on the tope o ; and sides and directed straight down. „© f . GENERAL NOTES: 8'dla. etas drdmage j o ( 1. All site Information was taken from a survey by Rodericko I 1 Van Tuyl, L.S. dated April 2849`13 2. All concrete for curbs and sidewalks and drainage structures o o shall conform to Planing Board 51andard Details and Specifications. �' ' ) 3. All grades shown are In U.S.C. < 65 Z { 1� 1 ' ESTIMATE OF QUANTITIES OF NEW MATERIALS: FARM 1 n f ARM HOUSE 1 t f . — — — — — — Conchete street curb: O lin. Ft. — — — — — 1 ' Concrete sidewalk: IT90 sq. Ft. O Concrete site curb: 896 lin. Ft. yl y\F Asphalt paving, 0 sq. YardsI catch basin: 8' dia. X 28 ft. Deep Land Bankod Parking Area ) " ,trees: O I for (36) parking spacesshrubs, 0 r .Area of natural vegetation to remain O acres '•.LOadt1 Ar I "� , °I e v Liar"`;til •.S _ I i , ry 4 - Lighting NEA STORAGE WAREHOUSE ILI o ' YI �V NQ o 1 C zz 8 ala. etas In o O O O O O O O O O O 01 O I 1000" LL3 Eli � ' ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' O • ° e o ( - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO OO 0 0 0 0-Q O O- O OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lJ 0� - - -- _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - — — r - - - - - - —1 d' N 40D 50' 55" W. 1019.71 I N 4aD 45' 20" W. 223919' bTail Red Cedar or American Aborvitas I o 10' O.C. In two rows 8 apart for screen planting04 Site LAND OF REILLY 51 lies p I a r cask iron watertight cover to grade APPROVED BY I o scale 1" = 20.0' -PLANNING BOARD f "ve r+°a°' "- TOWN OF SOUTHOLD mADS Class h• procat dome -- - - - - — - -, — - - --•- - - DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: N12 DAT MAY 29 area Material area run-off wet. Rainfall = volume •Es; ;;: ' �' ,, t..s, scan �j I I`IHY 42110) i Parking area gravel 25642 b0 % 2" =.166 = 2554 c.f. ;:;, ',? 1:11313000130130 Parking 4 Sidewalk concrete 2980 100% 2" _ .1661' = 495 c.f. 8t die. ❑❑❑0�0 - YI1 vtd Qft, i••t".iti` o ...r.� Tp1A�:,,r „ r,e" »' I �.. Doa❑❑❑❑qoD PlanningBoend'„' : 4d „ Building steel 96000 100% 2' =.166, =5976 c.f. �, - . IeaihhMg rkt9 000001 lclgoD s TOTALS, 64622 9a23 a,f: 0❑L7[7O❑❑1300 Le end RVISIONs, SEAL, ”+' Irk T SITE + "" 0 0E03❑Q❑ago Proposed'-5torage BullOng lfor^ F'irld YIrieyd r is ;i5 W � Use 8' dia. Rings • 42Z c.f✓ Y.F. 9025/42.3.- 214 v.f. , Dp❑❑Ca❑=110 PROX (00.00) Existing Elevation a .a 001]❑CiC7❑4� 00.00 Proposed Elevation a �.enut F Parking area A use:'(6) 8' dla x 12' deep, 72 1.1. � ' 0170❑❑❑[30QD D bottom or,Pool T.G. Top of curb ,fid c3 Main Road s and t n::. r l r s ,�, i�� T.6. Top of grate A I�� Building area Ube (12) 8' dia x 12' deep = 144 U. � � av11: f;e; ,,a",i.'a „ ,Mi",:a:a:� ¢lr f Psi E1eV. Elevation gr ; ..,., . . 1. ::�. , Gharle� W. Southard 'Jr. Re (s red'f i^Gl�it, H.P. High point g TOTAL5 - 216 Lf. _ 9`iJu1d wat°r o y , >S '1}5 6 471-52 a '.Is , 6 '5-22- 1 4400 Veterans Memorial!NWy: Su1te' N20T HaY:11141 ``;wiaTgpiGQl LPaG11rg Pool (51 :411-022e) 5-12-2001 200 Fa ' , "10 1"- 9000' iIf 0 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �g13FF0j/( BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ,r0 0(j Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman = y� P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J. CREMERS N Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone(631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. ifi O`� Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 30, 2001 Dr. Herodotus Damianos Go Pindar Vineyards P.O. Box 332 Main Road Peconic, NY 11958 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Pindar Vineyards SCTM # 1000-85-2-14 Dear Dr. Damianos: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a Special Meeting held on Monday, May 29, 2001: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, do an uncoordinated review of this unlisted action. The Planning Board established itself as Lead Agency, and as Lead Agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. WHEREAS, this proposed site plan, to be known as site plan for Pindar Vineyards, is to construct a 34,000 square foot storage building; and WHEREAS, Dr. Herodotus Damianos is the owner of the property known and designated as Pindar Vineyards, Route 25, Peconic, SCTM#1000-85-2-14; and WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of this site plan was submitted on May 14, 2001; and WHEREAS, this site plan was certified by the Building Inspector on May 14, 2001; and WHEREAS, this storage building will be used to store wine and wine and farm equipment; and 0 Pindar Vineyards — Paoe Two —May 30 2001 WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Committee has reviewed the elevation drawings and the Planning Board has accepted their recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, the Town Engineer has reviewed the drainage calculations and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final survey, dated May 22, 2001, subject to a one year review from date of building permit. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration and two copies of the approved site plan; one for your records and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for your building permit. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. V truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman encls. cc: Building Dept. Tax Assessors L Presubmission conference SITE PLAN (�vithirl 30 stays of written request) Complete application received lwithln 4 months of presub. conference) APpllcation reviewed at work session Nql �— Inro. CK (within 10 days of receipt) uro, oX APPlicant advised of necessary revisions o (wi(hin 30 clays of review) Revised submission received wt Ifq t LcadI4ency Coordination SEQRA determination o REFERRED TO: 0 h z H Zoning Board of Appeals N (written comments within 60 da e ----a 'sr Y• of request) -c Board of Trustees v —� In�ro� OK Y r r Building cu Department (certification) o w Suffolk County Department of Planning x ,Z5t zDepartment of Transportation -State t .a I„ .Pzb t OK Department of Transportation - County ro` oK Suffolk County Dept. of Ilealtll rqt ire Co missioners cG,tj� pD T OK Sent: ~ RECEIVED:V Ne1te- ( R/+/ G Received: ,y ray ��,�sM41Af Draft Covenants and Restrictions /Filed Covenants and Restrictions — Iro` oK t Landscape plan Lighting Plan --�_ 1„m. ` oK Curb Cut approval !Lroro.` C1K Ilealtli annroval --�_ I„ro.t OK ►�?tcviewed by lingitleer ----- I„Loco.` OK 'JF Ti9ry/E To c.or/roqd xI ro� Ol' �IfAR 6s So�TH,9r°1) <l�cdtaT�r Approval of Site C°radg,tli s� an -with conditions <I Endorsement of sire plan Certificate of Occupancv inspection o t OK One year review r—nI-- ' PLANNING BOARD MEMBE� gUFfO(,� C4O Town Hall, 53095 Main Road + BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR.rm =�O y Chaian P.O. Box 1179 y - Southold, New York 11971 WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L.EDWARDS T Fax(516) 765-3136 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. p *- Telephone(516) 765-1938 RICHARD G.WARD "low" � Date Received Date Completed PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Filing Fee TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN New -Change of Use D Re-use _Extension _Revision of Approved Site Plan MAY 15 A Name of Business or Site: SCTM#: 1000-_��_- -2— Location: Location: N0(M SIDE OF H&AQ (LD 15-01) EAST 0li= D11d06E. LAnX--- Address: Mpdf'I 9-'0 PLZz(JlC N- /. PS8 Name of Applicant: H�e2not)Tus D Add I,4,No Address of Applicant: Telephone: Owner of Land: HE-Lo OO TUS DAH I A tJ OS Agent or Person responsible for application: � (, w SO n_)P UCS JR_ ` Address: 00C— (:7014vUy �04ZO7 H 0 L-0200 N y 117 Telephone: _ ( 6-�I ) 4-� Site plans prepared by: C klfi .l.F-5 bV License No. y 3 0--z– Address: ZAddress: Telephone: Page 3 Planning Board Site Plan Application X6.004 Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) AG Zoning District Existing Use of Site r�dLM IN G — )I Kiej w Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more than one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. Q G?LQ 7� 41 000 G F S 17W 93)(1.E — Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) 46 noo Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) . 3 Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) — O Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) C1 G ?10 Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by N A Board of Appeals - Case # & date NN Board of Trustees - Case # & date Vi N NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date �J Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other NO Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? NA If so, have proper permits been obtained? li-1-61Name of issuing agency OA Number and date of permit issued. NO ACTION(EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION)MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION. APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL. DISCLOSURE PORN The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest_on the part of town officera and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow itto take whatever action is necessary to avoid same YOUR NANE: initial, ' (Last name, first name, m dd].e in`itiLalh, unless You are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name. ) NATURE. OF APPI.ICATION: (Cher_k all that apply. ) Tax grievance Variance Change of zone Approval of plat Exemption from plat or official map Other (If "Other, " name the activity. ) Do you personally (or through your company, apoune, sibling, Parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee or the Town of Southold? 'Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "nosiness Interest- means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. ✓// YES NO If you answered -YES," complete the balance or this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the apace provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) , A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of tl,e corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation) ; R) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a noncorporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) ; C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSIIIP Submitted ti —�� da of Signatur . / Pr i n L na �fQ me111 )'1)Qrn,or-)ot) Page 2 'Planning Board Site Plan Application APPLICANTS AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK (h;01)6 being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at fol -V4rbo( P60d Sn; ni �n✓yl�� in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above property, or that he is the ManCj 'nq IMCrnbe2 of the L,M; �-ed L G1g I;gtV Co h k (Title (Specify whether Partnershlp or Corp.) / which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Pians and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the I physical Improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. Signed _/a2z'le" (Owner) Signed (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) Sworn to me this 44 f Lary Public) O� ����IpIW�9Q E011d>13 u�N�J A1uno�>NoIInS'9ElESOS'ON VOA MON Io 8Ie1IS'3111111nd IUe110111 Wonylil VNILSIUN9 Site Plan Applications Public Hearings Under the current site plan application procedure, the process for reviewing a site plan application is: a public hearing is not scheduled and held by the Planning Board until after, among other things, the site plan has received a stamped Health Department approval. The applicant shall now have the following options: 1. To follow the established procedure, or 2. To have the Planning Board schedule and hold a public hearing on the site plan application and have the Planning Board vote on the proposed conditional site plan prior to the applicant receiving Health Department approval subject to the following conditions: A. The applicant hereby agrees and understands that if the site plan which receives stamped-Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change is material to any of the issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold a public hearing on this "revised" site plan application and review its conditional approval. B. The applicant agrees not to object to a new public hearing and Planning Board review of the revised application. Applicant Agreement on Site Plans. The applicant is aware of the terms of this approval and certifies to these terms by his/her signature below. Re: p _ 1 I WOML U)U rie(LY SCTM#: 1 g S ' R S- 14x1 Applicant Date 14.16-2 (9/95)-7c • • 617.20 SEOR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact($) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. •A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMA JN Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies,research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION NEitii W I tom- S �S� N LOCATION OF ACTION include Street Addres,municipality and county U BUSINESS TELEPHONE IC' NPP AME OF ALICANTISPONSOR A /171_�� W O O `T ADDRESS 44 S suI STATE ZIP CODE CITYmo . � 174 NAME OF ER❑INN (If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE S Ll� LtJo t63 ) ADDRESS ('� S,TA`TE ZIP C-90E CITYIPO E W 0 � j N � 1 � 1 S� DESCRIPTION OF ACTIONr OOO UJAe-'Z�14OU$� (DN0 3 I ST(w ul ti J Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial OResidential(suburban) ❑Rural(non-farm) OForest j9Kiriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE — PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) _ acres acres — — --- Forested � � � r acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres — acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres _ acres _--- Water Surface Area acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) — acres O — acres acres — Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres Other (Indicate type acres ------- PLyrtoura! GAaIIFIZ n, 1n� 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project suet c0A�l-3 tMSOIC- % of site a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained — ❑Poorly drained — % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY, Land Classification System? _3_(,__acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? OYes 0KO� a. What is depth to bedrock? N A (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of propod project site with slopes: ❑0-10% % 010-15% ado 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or conn in a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Dyes Bl o 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes e o tf e. What is the depth of the water table? - (in feet) �� 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? []Yes tbNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes 21*0 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes 2JNo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes rJNo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes C'3110 If yes, explain 14. Does the present sit include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes EfNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name N b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? fes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? 0'res ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ET es ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agp{ricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? OYes ONo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous o a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? OYes HNo • 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? OYes Elko B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions as appropriate) �, a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor _ '' r _ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: I acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 35- acres. d. Length of project, in miles: 1JAS -(If appropriate) e. if the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing —� _ ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour i (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately n I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure _height; width; 40 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy (s? `a - ft. 3 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from site? _0 tonsicubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? p1'es ON, ❑NIA a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? -- b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? {JYes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? O�es ONO I acres. 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed-from site. 5. Will any mature est (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). _$ _ 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated _1--(number). b. Anticipated date of,commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes t7No 0 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction -L4– : after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project – o 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes 0< If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes 2<0 a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? O'es ONO Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes tJNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes o 16. Will the project generate solid waste? es ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month ' � tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? S'ti'es ❑No C. If yes, give name ; location d. Wilh'any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes B1T e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes .04o a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? El" es ❑No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes 17No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes 01Vo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? t31es _ ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) — 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity _ O ^ gallons/minute. � 23. Total anticipated water usage per day Jr`—. gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes BNo If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: • • Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board CJYes ❑No City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes ONo City, Town Zoning Board OYes ONo City, County Health Department ❑Yes ONo Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ❑No Other Regional Agencies Dyes ❑No State Agencies OYes ❑No Federal Agencies ❑Yes ONo C. Zoning and Planning Information _� 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? L�SYes ONo If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision mite plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? A6(UGu MOR /C r,3&Q( l)Ad1oN 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4:. What is the proposed zoning of the site? S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ef e�s ❑No 7. What are the predominant llan'd.use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/. mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoin ing/surrounding land uses within a 1/ mile? es ONo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land; how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes Btq—o 11. Will the proposed action create emand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ❑Yes Mo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes i� a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ONo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification 1 certify that the informa 'on provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Spo am Date 01�— Signature k Title "^LH1 a If the action Is in the Coastal Area,an ou are a state agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2—PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any Impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c, If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the Impacil if Impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If Impact will occur but threshold Is lower than example, check column 1. d. Iden(ifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large Impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact In column 2 simply asks that It be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. I. If a potentially large Impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)In the project to a small to moderate Impact, also check the Yes box In column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained In Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential .Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑Yes ❑No • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than El11 ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ El [--]Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. 1:1 ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ Oyes (--]No 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e.,cliffs,dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO OYES • Specific land forms:. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ C1 Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluentwill be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 1 ❑ 1 ❑ Oyes ❑No 7 i 2 3' Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle tripsinany given ❑ ❑ Dyes ONo hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ O Dyes ONo heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ O Dyes ONo to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes ONo IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ Oyes ONo list using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ OYes ONo • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ O ❑Yes ONo than for agricultural purposes. • Ofher impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ O Dyes ONo migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 • 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact i Moderate Large Mitigated B Impact Impact Project Chan, • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ Dyes ON land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ Dyes ON or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. + • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON I + IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOL061CAL RESOURCES i 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO DYES i Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ Dyes ON project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON + t IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes Or • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑r • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑r 9 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact-Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique character- istics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to _ subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.14(g) ? ONO DYES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? El ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? ElEl ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No resource? • El El ❑Yes ❑No Other impacts: IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. El El ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. 0 [] ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: 10 Ilk • 1 2 NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be 17 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result Moderate Large Mitigated By of the Proposed Action? ONO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ [Dyes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • _Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ Dyes []No substances(i.e.oil, pesticides,chemicals, radiation,etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑NO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARAQTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future'projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO DYES It any action In Pan 2 Is Identified as a potential large Impact or If you cannot determine the magnitude of Impact,proceed to Part 0 11 Part 3—EVA, UATION OF THE IMPORTA WE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3.' Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals .... .Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 12 14 14 11 (9w5)-9c 617.20 SEAR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-'/a '/a-'/2 1/2.3 3.5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? O O ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? • National Park Service lands? ❑ O O ❑ O • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic O ❑ ❑ O O or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ O O as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ O O or Inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ O O O O scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? O ❑ ❑ ❑ O • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Localroad? ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) OYes ONo 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ❑No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *'/. mile * I mile Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential El 0 Industrial ❑ E) Commercial ❑ El Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks El ❑ O'esignated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *r/z mile El Yes El No *1 miles El Yes El No *2 miles ❑Yes ❑No *3 miles ❑Yes ❑No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance.Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is k- FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Dally Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 05/17/01 Receipt#: 2948 Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $1,950.00 Check#: 2948 Total Paid: $1,950.00 "414 J 0 r � w okf i 8 2001 �pfq Manifiv ftffd Name: Pindar, Vineyards Llc S 3 S 591-A Bicycle Path Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 Clerk ID: JOYCEW Intemal ID:32231 Southold Town Planning Board Page Eight May 29, 2001 Site Plans: Mr. Orlowski: 4:45 p.m. - Pindar Vineyards —This proposed site plan is for a 34,000 sq. ft. winery storage building. The property is located on Route 25 in Peconic. SCTM#1000-85-2-14 Are there any comments or questions on this site plan application? (There were none.) Hearing none, are there any questions or comments from the Board? (There were no questions or comments from the Board.) Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion to close the hearing. Unidentified Person in Audience: This is on site plan and its use with wineries? Mr. Orlowski: It's on this application. Unidentified Person in Audience: O.K. In reference to other perspective situations for future wineries, does this set a precedent? Mr. Orlowski: Do you want to step up to the microphone and ask the question? Unidentified Person in Audience: Yes. My name is Chris Baiz. I'm a vineyard owner/operator here in the Village of Southold. I have some concerns in terms of some of the issues involved with the Pindar situation, in particular, and the way it may impact other wineries that are either existing or in the future in terms of their issue of how they are codified or nomenclatured under the Building Department and other aspects. I'm not sure whether this is the appropriate time or what not but I think there are some issues here that, if this sets a precedent or establishes a precedent, I find in various Laws of the State of New York that the local issues contradict the State Laws and I would like to raise those issues, if this is the appropriate time. Mr. Orlowski: Well, the hearing right now is basically on the Pindar Winery storage building. They are allowed to build a storage building; it's an agricultural use. They've met all the criteria. It conforms to everything that's in the Code right now. It meets all the setbacks. It went to Architectural Review. So, anything you would want to do or are thinking of in regards to the wine industry, you would have to go before the Town Board or the Code Committee to address those concerns. But, right now, this application meets all the criteria. Mr. Baiz: O.K. Alright, but this is not to set a precedent for others at that point in terms of whether buildings are called agricultural use or commercial use. Southold Town Planning Board Page Nine May 29, 2001 Mr. Orlowski: Any agricultural building is probably a commercial-type building but with an agricultural use. The Town is promoting the agricultural preservation and without buildings, I don't know how agriculture would survive. Mr. Baiz: I just want to note here that in addition to — because I've heard some things swirling around that farming is farming and wine making is not farming and yet, the New York State Tax Laws define wine sales and wine making as farming and the buildings that wines are either stored in or processed in are deemed to be qualified agricultural properties and not commercial properties or commercial buildings in essence and whether that if one were to use existing agricultural buildings on a farm vineyard for these activities, that they are not swept into the element of commercial buildings based upon the existing laws in the State of New York with regards to farming including the sale of wine which the Tax Law says right here. Mr. Orlowski: Well, I agree with you that an agricultural building is that— it's an agricultural building and it is in an Agricultural Zone and conforms to everything in our Code. I'm not sure what you're looking at for the future but this application — Mr. Baiz: I'm looking for full farm winery development in the future and that they're not, in terms of the Tax Law and Ag. and Markets Law and the Alcohol and Beverage Law, come under one category and then under the Building Department, come under another category. Mr. Orlowski: Yes, well, in the Building Department it comes in under a building on an agricultural piece of property. Mr. Baiz: In the Tax Law of the State of New York it says that those buildings that are there for wine storage and wine production qualify as agricultural buildings. Mr. Orlowski: And they should. Mr. Baiz: Right. Not as commercial buildings. Mr. Orlowski: Exactly. Mr. Baiz: O.K. I just want to make sure that we're there for any future — all future —farm wineries. Mr. Orlowski: Same as years ago when we had all the potato acreage and they built potato buildings. Mr. Baiz: It's interesting: In the Tax Law they talk about not only all sorts of various traditional agricultural uses of buildings qualify as agricultural buildings but they also talk about buildings for the use and production of maple syrup, cider and the sale of wine from a farm winery; buildings and structures used to process the sap and the syrup, the • Southold Town Planning Board Page Ten May 29, 2001 Mr. Baiz (con't.): apples into cider or grapes into wine are considered qualified agricultural products even though the property is used in processing. Mr. Orlowski: I totally agree with that. Mr. Baiz: So, the making of these end products is not a manufactured process; it's an agricultural process. Mr. Orlowski: Right now, that's the way we look at it and I don't look at it any other way. Mr. Baiz: Is there an issue in other areas of the Town Government where it might not be? Mr. Orlowski: Not here. Mr. Turner: If the Building Department looks at it differently, that's the Building Department. The Building Department makes the determination if something needs a site plan. Then it comes to us for the site plan. Mr. Baiz: Why would the Building Department determine that there is a need for a site plan? Mr. Orlowski: It's spelled out in the Code that everything needs a site plan except for a residential house. Mr. Baiz: Even existing use buildings? Mr. Orlowski: No. Anything that comes into the Building Department to get a Building Permit. Mr. Baiz: O.K., very good. Thank you. Mr. Orlowski: Any other questions or comments? (There were none.) I'll entertain a motion to close the hearing. Mr. Caggiano: So moved. Mr. Cremers: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Latham. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. (The hearing was closed at 4:56 p.m.) Southold Town Planning Board Page Eleven May 29, 2001 I'll make the resolution: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, do an uncoordinated review of this unlisted action. The Planning Board established itself as Lead Agency, and as Lead Agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Mr. Cremers: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Latham. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. Further— WHEREAS, this proposed site plan, to be known as site plan for Pindar Vineyards, is to construct a 34,000 square foot storage building; and WHEREAS, Dr. Herodotus Damianos is the owner of the property known and designated as Pindar Vineyards, Route 25, Peconic, SCTM#1000-85-2-14; and WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of this site plan was submitted on May 14, 2001; and WHEREAS, this site plan was certified by the Building Inspector on May 14, 2001; and WHEREAS, this storage building will be used to store wine and wine and farm equipment; and WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Committee has reviewed the elevation drawings and the Planning Board has accepted their recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, the Town Engineer has reviewed the drainage calculations and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore Southold Town Planning Board Page Twelve May 29, 2001 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final survey, dated May 22, 2001, subject to a one year review from date of Building Permit. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Caggiano, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Latham. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? The motion carries. • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as '5 (27-nW :lf/7 ADOO - 3? 5 - �? - /zI by placing the Town's official poster notices(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster h s re ained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on 5�oz9Jo I have sent notices, by certified mail, the receipts of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the above mentioned property on i WON) D Your name ( t) 300"MTowtt Signat Address Date tary PC NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New YOTK cuplNo.4823516,Suffolk Term Expires: PLEASE RETURN TH/S AFF/DA14T AND CERT/F/ED MAIL RECE/PTS ON THE DAY OF, OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING Re: Pindar Vineyards/Dr. Herodotus Damianos SCTM#: IOQQ-a5-2-14 Date of Hearing: Tuesday, May 29 2001, 4:45 p.m. Z 010 713 609 Z 010 713 597 US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail US Postal Service No Insurance Coverage Provided. Receipt for Certified Mail Do not use for International Mail sea reverse No Insurance Coverage Provided. rV11 S OusernationaljWSe reverse'ZIP_ $ �1 cemred Fee ,r Spedei Deiivery Fee USS' Z 010 713 600 Restdded Delivery Fee coN US Postel Service Whom Receipt Showing ro"a Dam Delivered .� Receipt for Certified Mail = d > No Insurance Coverage Provided. 1lehen Rxeptses Address Dale,BAddrmem's Address of use for InternadonalMel reverse C . O8 TOTAL Postage&Fees $ W Postmark or Date L eaPDa ,Y 1 U) a Postage $ CedMted Fee SPedei D*My Fm — Z 010 713 598 US Postal Service Z 010 713 599 Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided. US Postel Service Do not use for International Mail See reverse Receipt for Certified Mail 400`5 NQ Insurance Coverage Provided. �u Dchlot te use for International Mail See reverse 1—p, f c C le 3 . a4 / ....�— T Postage V Z 010 713 608 Cerflied Fee O US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail spedeioermreryF y 'r NO Insurance Coverage Provided. Restided Delivery F Do not use for International Mail See reverse u+ Return Receipt Shoorkg to _ When 8 Dant Delivered z Realm Rao*Showkg to Whom. Date,B Addressee's Address N '/ / TOTAL Postage a Fees �Q co Postrnark or Date Pie $ o LL Certifxb Fee a IN Y Spada]Delivery Fee Rectided Delivery Fee S„ n Reiren Receipt ShWAV to Q Whore d Date DsKWW '� Raan RecePtSMwiigbWhan, y J� Deb,BMtres6eeS Maass `�/' 8 TOTAL Postage a Fees g 3. Posama*or Date is 0 LL to a A- Received by(Please Prhd Complete ftems'1 2^and 9.Also complete 1 ' Item 4 If RWUCW_._QslWety ls desired' '- ■ Print yourname S!>a" to you v C. S' ❑Agent so that Mle can reW rr ■ Attach thls card 2o'tfie beds of the mailpiece. X ❑Addressee or on to kor space PeR^fts• D. Is debvey addres dillererd eom Item 17 ❑Yes 1. Article to, If YES,ender de ery eddrese below: 0 NO .. /� • 3. Servke . ❑Express ar,m Mail ng �••�`� I�� ❑Re9isl sA Receipt fa MemherMise "ri - ❑Insu Mail ❑C.O.D. i�, q, clad Delivery!(fa Feel ❑Yes it 2. Article Numtaa(COP:.AOrO`U'�7 ' 102595-WM 0952 � PS Foran 3811�July'4999 Dotrrestic Retum Receipt " MM= ■ Complete Items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Received by(Plass&Print Clearly) B. D to f silvery item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. Igns re ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, X .O Agent or on the front if space permits. ❑Addressee r D. Is delivery address di ferent from Item 1? ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No �t i(OAL A Aca n.✓� �___. ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. by(Pbase Print Clee!ty) B. of DNivery item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. �— //,q�j�, h• �� ■ Print your name and address on the reverse C, e so that we can return the card to you ❑Agent ■ Attach this card to the back of them apiece, X ❑Addressee or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Received by(Pleme Print Cbarly) B. en of Del ery 11 item 4 it Restricted Delivery is desired. iTi !: ■ Print your name and address on the reverse C. Signature so that we can return the card to you. 0Agent ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, X Addresses or on the front if space permits. D.Ifs delivery address different from item 1? ❑Vas 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No �o( A 1 link ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Rece by(Please Print Cbar.W B. a of Delivery item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. �'•/J`y ��/"/ vl%4� ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. C. ature ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, 11 Agent or on the front'd space permits. ❑Addressee D. s delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes a ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Received (Please Print Cbarty) B. Date of Delivery item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. �. _ r0 ■ Print your name and address on the reverse C so that we can return the card to you. ' , • ❑Agent ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, �Nv`'' ❑Addressee or on the front if space perils. D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No -TYNrV I am 5 iii- P 61Cyc [re� 3. Serviertihed Mail ❑E Mail ❑Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise ` 1 ❑ Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Exhe Fee) ❑Yes %�JD►pr�' PS Form 3,811,Juy 1�9�91l8 Domestic Ratum Receipt 10259500-M-0952 , PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS c BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. .Z.� O, Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman y� P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS H Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS Ve Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGL9NO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant May 29, 2001 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Pindar Vineyards .SCTM#: 1000-85-2-14 Location: Route 25, Peconic SEAR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This proposed site plan is to construct a 34,000 square foot storage building. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. SEQR Neaative Declaration - Paae Two For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (631)765-1938 cc: Roger Evans, DEC Stony Brook Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Southold Town Building Dept. Applicant JEAN W. COCHRAN °rry� JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROADZ ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (516)-765-1366 �� �� Tel.(516)-765-1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 24, 2001 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: PindarWinery - Main Road, Peconic MAY 24 211 SCTM #: 1000 — 85 — 02 — 14 Dear Mr. Orlowski: �� The Site Plan and Drainage Calculations forthe above referenced project have been revised and submitted to my office for review. The site plan dated 5/22/01 as prepared by Charles W. Southard, Jr. has been updated and now meets the minimum requirements of the Town Code for drainage requirements. Enclosed please find copies of this Plan for your use. It should also be noted that the site plan has indicated that driveway and truck turning areas will constructed and surfaced with a Recycled Concrete Blend material or(RCA). The Town Code does not allow this product to be applied as a finish material. It is recommended that a V Crushed Blue Stone Blend Material be used in place of the RCA. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. c ely, James A. Ichter, R.A. cc: Edward Forrester (Building Department) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �gUFFO(,rc 0 BENNETT OTown Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman rxnan I,JR. O.ZO G,y� P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J. CREMERS N Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. �.j. �� Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 24, 2001 Dr. Herodotus Damianos C/o Pindar Vineyard P. O. Box 332 Main Road Peconic, NY 11958 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Pindar Vineyards SCTM# 1000-85-2-14 Dear Dr. Damianos, The Planning Board has received the enclosed report from the Town Engineer. The report is being sent to you for your attention. Please note that the Town Code does not permit the proposed Recycled Concrete Blend. It is recommended that a%" Crushed Blue Stone Blend Material be used in place of the RCA. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office. (jeKassner Site Plan Reviewer Encl. Cc: Charles W. Southard Jr., Registered Architect ��uFFot�.c JEAN W. COCHRAN JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR ENGINEER TOWN HAIL - 53095 MAIN ROAD y. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Faz. (516)-765-13660 Tel.(516)-765-1560 OFFICEOFTHE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 24, 2001 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Pindar Winery - Main Road, Peconic SCTM #: 1000 — 85 — 02 — 14 Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Site Plan and Drainage Calculations for the above referenced project have been revised and submitted to my office for review. The site plan dated 5/22/01 as prepared by Charles W. Southard, Jr. has been updated and now meets the minimum requirements of the Town Code for drainage requirements. Enclosed please find copies of this Plan for your use. It should also be noted that the site plan has indicated that driveway and truck turning areas will constructed and surfaced with a Recycled Concrete Blend material or(RCA). The Town Code does not allow this product to be applied as a finish material. It is recommended that a %" Crushed Blue Stone Blend Material be used in place of the RCA. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. S. c ely, James A. 1chter, R. . cc: Edward Forrester (Building Department) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �OgOFFO(,�c Q BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 .i.0 G Chairman y� P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS N Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDS 0 T Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. .f� O�� Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold,a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 29th day of May, 2001 on the question of the following: 4:30 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed set-off for Reynold Blum at Peconic. The property is located on the west side of Peconic Lane in Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-75-5-1. 4:35 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed minor subdivision for John Sidor. The property fronts on the north side of CR 48 and the south side of Wickham Avenue in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-107- 10-6. 4:40 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed lot line changes and set-off for Catherine Sidor. The property fronts on the north side of CR 48, the east side of Mary's Road and the south side of Wickham Avenue in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-107-10-1, 3 &4. 'F,*X Public Hearing for the proposed site plan forfAMW VHway The property is located on the north side of Route 25, 180' east of Bay Avenue in Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-85-2-14. Dated: 5/15/01 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, MAY 17, 2001 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU. COPIES SENT TO: Suffolk Times Traveler Watchman P.O. Box 1179 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Southold Town Phone: (631) 765-1938 Planning Board Fax: (631) 765-3136 E-Mail: planning@southold.org Fax To: Christina Weber, The Suffolk From: Valerie Scopaz/carol Times Fac Pages: 2 Phone: Date: 5/15/01 Re: Legal Ad for 5/17/01 Edition cc: Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply As Requested Please print the following 4 legal ads in the May 174' Edition. Thanks. 4:30 p.m.: Reynold Blum at Peconic 4:35 p.m.:John Sidor 4:40 p.m.: Catherine Sidor 4:45 p.m.: Pindar Vineyards STATE OF NEW YORK) )SS' COUNTY OF SUFFOLK " of Mattituck, in said Ki county, bei duty sworn, says that he/she is Principal _- dark of THE SUFFOLK TIMES,a weekly newspaper,pub- lished at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York,and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly pub- lished in said Newspaper once each week w for L weeks successively, commencing on the day , of 20 CHRISTINAT.WEBER Notary Public,State of New York .t Qualified sums olk County Prind I Clerk ye Commission Expires December 13, Sworn to before me this day of 20Qi_ -.: ad -., kipl AvaaUe iD T e' sol F x RD .1'tf'ctYt? a • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman y� P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J. CREMERS va Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. .!i O!� Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGLSNO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 15, 2001 Dr. Herodotus Damianos Go Pindar Vineyards P.O. Box 332 Main Road Peconic, NY 11958 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Pindar Vineyards SCTM # 1000-85-2-14 Dear Dr. Damianos: The final public hearing on the maps, dated May 12, 2001, will be held on Tuesday, May 29, 2001 at 4:45 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Office, Southold Town Hall. Please return the endorsed Affidavit of Posting, proof of certified mailing, and the signed green return receipts from the certified mailings on the day of the public hearing before 4:00 p.m. Please also return the sign and the post to the Planning Office after the public hearing. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Be;nneOrloPki /P�tt Chairman encl. Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-85-2-14; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the A-C (Agricultural Conservation) Zoning District; 4. That the application is for construction of a 34,000 sq. ft. winery storage building. The property is located on the Main Road (Route 25) in Peconic; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765- 1938; 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Tuesday May 29. 2001 at 4.45 P.m. in the Meetina Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): Dr. Herodotus Damianos/Pindar Vineyards Date: 5/15/01 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notices(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail, the receipts of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the above mentioned property on Your name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RE7URN TH/S AFF/DAWT AND CERT/FIED MA/L RECE/PTS ON THE DAY OF OR AT THE PUBLIC HEAR/NG Re: Pindar Vineyards/Dr. Herodotus Damianos SCTM#: 1DDo-85-2-14 Date of Hearing: Tuesdav, May 29 2001, 4:45 p.m. § 58-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1 Chapter 58 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1. Providing notice of public hearings. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 12-27-1995 as L.L. No. 25-1995. Amendments noted where applicable.] § 58-1. Providing notice of public hearings. Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing, this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon.The board or commission reviewing an application shall provide for the giving of notice: A. By causing a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. By requiring the applicant to erect the sign provided by the town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application abuts, giving notice of the application, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than ten (10) feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven (7) days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. The applicant or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has compiled with this provision. C. By requiring the applicant to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street 5801 § 58-1 SOUTHOLD CODE § 58-1 from the property included in the application. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested, posted at least seven (7)days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll. The applicant or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision. 5802 DR. HERODOTUS DAMIANOS � PINDAR VINEYARDS 1000-85-2- 14 CONSTRUCTION OFA 349000 SQ. FT. � WINERY STORAGE BUILDING TUES. - MAY 299 2001 - 4 :30 P.M. • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ,Z,� �(j Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman p y� P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J. CREMERS N - Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone(631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. .y O`� Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 29th day of May, 2001 on the question of the following: 4:30 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed set-off for Reynold Blum at Peconic. The property is located on the west side of Peconic Lane in Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-75-5-1. 4:35 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed minor subdivision for John Sidor. The property fronts on the north side of CR 48 and the south side of Wickham Avenue in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-107- 10-6. 4:40 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed lot line changes and set-off for Catherine Sidor. The property fronts on the north side of CR 48, the east side of Mary's Road and the south side of Wickham Avenue in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-107-10-1, 3 &4. 4:45 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Pindar Vineyards. The property is located on the north side of Route 25, 180' east of Bay Avenue in Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-85-2-14. Dated: 5/15/01 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, MAY 17, 2001 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU. COPIES SENT TO: Suffolk Times Traveler Watchman • s P.O. Box 1179 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Southold Town Phone: (631) 765-1938 Planning Board Fax: (631) 765-3136 E-Mail: planning@southold.org To; Christina Weber, The Suffolk From: Valerie Scopazvcarol Times Fac Pages; 2 Phone: Date: 5/15/01 Re: Legal Ad for 5/17/01 Edition CC: Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply As Requested Please print the following 4 legal ads in the May 117th Edition. Thanks. 4:30 p.m.: Reynold Blum at Peconic 4:35 p.m.:John Sidor 4:40 p.m.: Catherine Sidor 4:45 p.m.: Pindar Vineyards • ��gpFFO(�c • Town Hall,53095 Main Road p Fax(516)765-1823 P.O. Box 1179 W ? Telephone(516)765-1802 Southold,New York 11971-0959 dol � dao BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman FROM: Building Department DATE: May 14, 2001 BUILDING DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN CERTIFICATION Project Pindar Winery Storage Building Location Main Road Peconic SCTM# 1000 - Section 85 - Block 2 - Lots 14 Date of Last Revision 10-30-00 1. THE PROPOSED USE, winery storage building AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN IS /ARE PERMITTED IN THIS AC DISTRICT. 2. PROPOSED AND EXISTING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 100 OF SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 3. ALL STRUCTURES COMPLY WITH SETBACKS AS CONTAINED IN BULK SCHEDULES OR ELSEWHERE IN CHAPTER 100. Authorized Signature PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Q BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 .r� G Chairman y3 P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J. CREMERS N - Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. .y O`� Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer RE: Pindar Winery Main Road, Peconic SCTM# 1000-85-2-14 DATE: May11, 2001 Please review the attached for certification. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. .r� Q(j Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman y� P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS H - Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS 0 Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y O`er Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Jamie Richter, Town Engineer FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer RE: Pindar Winery Main Road, Peconic SCTM# 1000-85-2-14 DATE: May 11, 2001 Please review the attached for drainage, SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE May 1 , 2001 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m.. Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Theodore Carpluk, Southold Yan Rieger, Orient Sanford Hanauer, Mattituck Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Also attending was Robert G. Kassner of the Planning Board Staff . Moved by Theodore Carpluk and seconded by Garrett Strang, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of April 5, 2001. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. PINDAR VINEYARDS STORAGE BUILDING (Main Road - Peconic) Robert Kassner described a 36,000 square foot climate controlled,building of metal material set back from the Main Road. The Committee would like to see a site plan showing the parcel with the proposed building together with the parcel to its east in order to see the relationship of the buildings; also a floor plan showing the usage of the building and photographs of both properties. The Committee invites the owner and/or the architect to a meeting to be held next week The concerns for discussion are the appearance of the elevation facing the road, the visibility of the west elevation from the road, and the mansard on the east elevation; all to lead to lead to an appearance more in character with a farm building. &'a'v 6)'a' Robert W. Keith Secretary F ty i aR► a ' F r 5 40D 40' 50" W. 9261.64' r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � PROPERTY INFO ATION: Herodotus Damianos i I Address. Main Road Peconlo, New York 11958 I Suffolk County Tax Map •: 1000-857-2-14 Zoning: Agriculture/Conservation IProposed Use: YVlnery Storage Warehouse 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA: I I Site Area : 36.004 acres Building Areal -26 ,000 ISite Coverage. Pr2plili& - . ft. 210/J I Total Planting: 54.523 acres or 916 % I o I BUILDING DATA: I Usage: 0-4.1 Gold storage of food products I _ Fire Hazard: Low I Construction: Type 21a Non Combustlble I I o I PARKING DESIGN: _ I I � Storage Building O I 36000 s.f. of floor area a I space/ 1000 s!. of bullding 212.00' I a, I 36000/30 - 36 spaces I Required = 36 spaces Provided - Land Bank 36 spaces I I p ro- I a I Hondlcop Parking = 5% x 36 = (2) space a I 1 I EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING NOTES: o I. Lumark Model MHINL-25OMT 250 watt Metal Halide o J light fixtures mounted on wall a 12' above grade REGYG ONGRETE BLEND I I TRUCK-TURNING AREA I Q 2. All outdoor lighting fixtures shall be shielded on the tope I and sides and directed straight down. 1 GENERAL NOTES: I 1 1.! All site Information was taken from a survey by Roderick o I I Van Tuyl, L.S. dated April 28,1993 I /}\ o o I .� 2. All concrete for curbs and eldewalks and drainage structures I shall conform to Planning Board Standard Details and I �_�./ ~ Specifications. � I o I 1 3. All grades shown are In U.5.C. 4 6.5 km�z . I I ESTIMATE OF QUANTITIES OF NEW MATERIALS: Y i FARM HOUSE I Concrete street curb: 0 Iln. Ft. I Concrete sidewalk: 1790 sq. Ft. o I ' Concrete site curb: 836 lin. Ft. Asphalt paving: O sq. Yards catch basin: 8' dia. X 28 ft. Deep 0 I Land Banked Parking Area I I I trees: O for (36) parking spaces -� I shrubs: O IArea of natural vegetation to remain O acres Loading Ar. I L - - - - - - - -J (2) dl aes = I $ 9 � ... . . ... :. I Lighting I o I $. I NEW STORAGE WAREHOUSE I I m o 2f I If I I I g I I 0IQ 1 o , o, o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • a e a I N I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0-j- 0 — O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 9 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � - - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — T - — - - .-_ - L - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - � N40 50' 55" W. 1019.71' I o I N 40D 45' 20' W. 2259.29' b"fall Red Cedar or American Aborvltae 10' O.G. in two rows V apart for screen planting I I Site LANDOF REILLY cast Iron watertight cover to grade I o o o I scale l" - 20.0' 1 Invert .64.01 1 CIA DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: ADSMIMIS, dia. prec tdome L - D ADS Glass NI2 I J N area Material area run-off coeP. Rainfall = volume I MAY 15 001 econ n N Parking area gravel 840 100% 2" -.166 = 13q 0. 013❑❑❑❑0000 _ — — — — Sldewalk concrete 1790 100% 2" = .166 - 286 a.f. I0' dia. ❑❑❑013!1 - - - $OU'[hOld OVllfl recast 0❑❑❑❑❑❑❑130 Landscaping lawn 11656 10% 2" =.166 = 197 c.f. leaching ring PI®nning bHrd Building . 36450 100% 2" =.166 - 6050 c.f. .' ''`r, 0000000000 steel 0130❑❑❑0000 Legend REVI51oN5: SEAL: Proposed Storage Building for Pindor Vineyards IRR TOTALS 50,136 6673 c,.?. 0000000000 PROJECT 517E o Use 8' dia. Rings a 42.3 c.fJ v.f. 6673/42.3 - 158 v.f. `. 0001:1000000O (00.00) Existing Elevation EREG 0000❑❑❑❑00 00.00 Proposed Elevation + Main Road Peconic, New York $ 5' collar n T.G. To of curb • Parking area A use (2) 8' dia x 8' deep = 16 IS. of clean �„�;� :” 0OO❑❑❑❑❑130 - Bottom of Pool P *�2O' T.6. To of rate Buuam area use (12) 8' dia x 12' dee 44 IS. sand and ",; ,:, ..Q?*:^ P 9 0 9 p ° gravel " " " ;.I'.dJ .. Elev. Elevation Charles W. Southard Jr. Registered Architect H.P. High point -� TOTAL5 = 160 I.P. ground water +69.0' TLHpical Leaching Pool DATE;5-12-2001 f 00 , (516° ;et5228 Memorial Hwy. 5ulta •207 ax ('516)4-7-521241 scale I"= 9000' +/- arPeo>FE® as NoreD OCCUPANCY y"`;a PROPERI 1' INFORMATION: DATE: 1 Ot) F.P. # �% O'�d�'l!Y 016 �� USE IS UNLAWFUL Herodotue Damldnae FEE: Sh— BY: a /address: Main Road , NOTIFY BUILDING D ART NT AT �?'g''' yL I 765-1602 9 AM TO 4 PM FOR THE WITHOUT CERTIFICATE Be PeGonIG, NOW York .119 ' I� FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS: 1. FOUNDATION - TWO REQUIRED �� f1 /� Suffolk County Tax Map 0, 1005 R -14-" K -. FOR POURED CONCRETE OF OCCUPANCY Zoning: �,� 3. INSULATION 2. ROUGH - FRAMING & PLUMBING Proposed Use: Alne Storage Warehouse 4. FINAL - CONSTRUCTION MUST BE COMPLETE FOR C.O. BITE DEVELOPMENT DATA: I ' l �' ' ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET Site Area 36.004 acres THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE N.Y. UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE STATE CONSTRUCTION & ENERGY REQUIRED Building Area: Proposed = 36,000 SLt, ft. CODES. NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ERRORS Site Coverage: 2.2115 % Total Platting: 34523 acres, or 96 % BUILDING DATA: Usage: 6-4.1 Cold storage of food products LAND Fire Hazard: Low OF onstructlon. Tpe 2b Non combustible DAMI ANDS G -4 ' s 40d 40' 50" E PARKING DESIGN: p - - — -- — - - 36 - e/ SW s.f. of buil Q. Storage Building - - - I 000 a f of floor area o I spat ding .{� - .— 360 0/30 - 72 $ tea .I — - 3988.20 O pa 11 / - - — - - -- - - — - - — - - — f 7 I . Required 'spores, Provided = .3 >5 — Handicap Parking = 5% x 12 - (4) space : , o _ _ GENERAL NOTES: 2 � I. All aIle Information was taken from a survey by Roderlck 0 m1 y 212.00 -- Van Tuyl, L.S. dated April 28,1993 p _ j Ca 2. All concrete for curbs and sidewalks and drainage structures ry0 'Y1 aQp shall conform to Planning Board Standard Details and UN IIS m K 5peclficatlons. 3. All grades shown are In USA. 1 6.5 N 40d 45 20 ' W - - - - — - _ - - - = — — — U1 ESTIMATE OF QUANTITIES OF NEW MATERIALS: Concrete street curb: O IIn. Ft. N 40d 50' Sy' ynj - - concrete sidewalk: 1'190 sq. Ft. LAND 8' dlam. x 12' V.I.P. storm drywall (}yp. 12 ' Concrete site arb: 836 Iln. Ft. OF I� Asphalt paving: 0 sq. Yards L"" — -- ''� catch basin: 8' dia. X 26 ft. Deep REILLY 1 trees: O shrubs. O Area of natural vegetation to remain O acres Site Plan $tale I" - 150.0' cast Iron watertight cover to grade I ' DRAINAGE GALCULATION5: Invert +04.0' _ � area Material area run-off coef. Rainfall volume min 4" dia. prec t dome Parkin area ravel 840 100% 2" =.166 = 139 c.f. clops 2400 pl 9 g Sidewalk concrete 1'190 100% 2" _ .166 = 286 c.f. 1 '� Landscaping lawn 11856 10% 2" =.166 Iq1 c.f. - I 00❑❑❑❑❑000 Building steel 36450 100% 2" =.166 = 6050 c.f. 10' dia. ❑❑❑l700 $ I ' precast OO❑❑❑❑❑❑❑0 h ` ) ' � E leaching ring 0�0❑❑❑❑❑DO TOTALS 50936 66"19 c.f. 0❑0CI❑❑❑ODO ° - Use 0' dla. Rings o 42.3 c.fl v.f. 66"13/423 = 15B v.f. i 0❑❑❑❑❑❑❑OO u n9 _ 0❑�q❑❑❑❑OO Parking area A use (2) B' dia x e' deep = 16 Lf. OD❑❑❑❑❑DOD 3' collar 100000 01131300 ry Bottom or Pool Building area use (12) 8' dia x 12' deep = 144 Lf. of loart gand and r. 10 qla «'12.0' I -. gravel ,7 TOTALS = 160 Lf. -- -- -- Legend � ISIONS' Proposed Storage Building for Pinder Vineyards ground water +641.0' 1ERED (00.00) Existing EI atlon 0r'as w.s a 00.00 Proposed Iovatlon e Ocr , T ical 5anitar LeachingPOOI T.c. Top of curb * y Main Road Poconic, New Ygrk �� T.G. Top of Brat ' Elev. Elevation H.P. High point Q o Charles IN. Southard Jr. Registered Architect o 4400 veterans Memorial Hwy. Suite #20'1 Hoblililic1c, N.Y. 11.741 DATE: PRO T. (516) 4'11-5228 Fax (516 4'11-5229 - - 10-30-2000 200 ... 3 Charles K Southard Jr:' ' ARCHITECT. 4400 Veteran's Highway ' 3 Sults •201 2 9 4 5 b 8 q 0 II 12 3 I 12 Holbrook, New York IIT on - H ok 41 1 2a-6 -0 _ _ - _ Phone (516) 4TI 5228 T Fax (516) 411-5229 o ° 0 51.A15 ON GRADE OD 6" concrete slab wlth _ O -- i. - -- - - - bxb 6/6 wire mesh -` O i O i - o101- 50Po 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 19'_6° . 8'_� _o.. 5'-2" 6'-0" V-O" 5'-2" ho 1161 1 Z01 Fa FOUNDATION PLAN '-e" mss'-0" Is'-o"_ acme I/16" = I'-O" V O Q z Q - O `- 6X6 6/6 wire mash centerline of footing \ footing size • �� .�2,01 (2) s5 baro continuous P�a\SS W S�49 designation —�, 2��0y m a � I FOOTINE DE516N o v a � I. Design Loads • Live Load- 120 per floor FQ 2 50 ot root Haunch Footing Dead Load. 40 pef floor Rt • scale 1/2" = I'-0" 15 pe/ fool (14) +5 ban Total 205 pat Ist d 2nd Floor Plans, vertically !-' SOII Bearing = 1 1/2 tons • 3000 *4 horizontal —premolded expansion Joint L 1 l 6X6 6/6 wire mesh Gorner Roof Load brick ledge 600 a.f. x 45 pef • 2"1000* / 3000* • '9A s.f. use 3.0'x3A'x I'-O" see schedule for size ]I rade r- .� , Eavo Wall Roof Only 1200 a.! x 45 paf - 540000/5000* - 18.0 s.f. use 5.0'x5.0'xl'-4" Inside Gorner Mansard Roof Load \—(2) a5 baro top t bottom 1240 a.f x 45 paf • 55050ei3000* = 141.35 0. use 5.0'x5.0'xl'-4" Noll Column 4 Footing —2"x24" rigid Insul5tlon Inside Mansard Roo! Load • MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS, 1350 s.! x 45 pop • 62100#!3000* • 201 sd. use 5A6A5A'xl'4' scale 1/2" = I'-O" undisturbed Sal 2. Excavationv outside Gorner Mansard Roo! Load I.Contractor shall verify the location of all existing underground utilities prior to any 45 s.f x 45 pe4 • 2025110/500010 • .5-15 ad. use 2.0' x 2.0' x LO' Typical Brick Veneer Nall Grade Beam excavation. � Outsid�e scale 1/2" P-o" with Concrete. Mansard Roof Load _ 2.Gontractor shall excavate to required depths and any excavation below shall be filled a0alx 45 pef , 4050#/3000* • I.B5 :..f. use 2.0' x 2.0' x l.o' proposed Storage J = L/ centerline of foot) g 4t of Steel 3.Gontractor *hall compact fill under slabs to 95 % minimum derol outside Mansard Roo! a Loa In Dock V p ty. G Building for footing size 4.FIII under slabs shall be clean and free of clay or organic materials. 66 e.f x 45 pat • 2a110*,15000* • .119 s.f, use 2.0' x 2.0' x 1.0' designation I premolded expansion Joint SSoll under footings shall have a minimum bearing capacity of II/2 tors per square � Outside Mansard Roo! a Gorher Loading Dock pindar VlfieyordS - foot. 69e.! x 45 f = 91050/5000* ., 1.055 s.l. use 2A' x 2.0' x IA' t'w4,,,,4,rf 8„ bxb 6/6 were mesh 3. Concrete rni ad • ' • ' rade I. All design and constructlan shall canlarm to the American Gonerote Institute " 9ullding \/Code Requirements for Remfanced Concrete". A.G.I. 516,Latest Editionpier , 2. All c,,a oto for footings and foundation* shall be S000 ps.l. minlmum at 28 days. ban All concrete for slabs shall bs 4000 pe.l. minimum at 28 day*.tally t -IN '—(2) *5 bans top t bottom All s. Relrnfoncln�tsalfor aehall wnformil be Fa ASTMOpz,l. minimum MI5K5rade 60 day. with 5% air entralrment.. �OOT ,1,ICDULE:" o rll2" O.G.zontal ' • 2"x24' rlgld Insuletion All corner bars shall extend I'-6' minimum. Lap Joints eomecttlg ban* 1'-¢" minimum. I Y� �G ` o s 4. Welded wire fabric mesh *hall conform to the latest edition of ASTM A-185 Main Road (4) *5 baro c tinvoue "�undleturbed Boll and have a minimum of concrete cover of I" In all floor slabs. K F00T1Nl size PIER 51zie KEINFQRCINO pecorl New York' ' 6. All anchor bolts, nuts, anal washers shall be ASTM Type A 3071. ' 'L The top of all concrete surfaces shall ice true ail level, with a smooth Noat for length' width depth 'length width depth Oct. 28, e footings ad foundation and'a steel trowel finish for building slabs and b broom, finish � 2000 & for exterior surfaces, All surfaces shall be wlthn Ire" +/- ® 9'-0"-. = B'=0" I'-O" 16" 24" IB" 0) e4 baro oa. way 1 odule for size - 8. All veld& In exterior exposed concrete surfaces sholl be hand patched to'provkl* a smooth finish. - " , Gorner Column Footing Typical, Masonry Wall Foundation Footing Typical Wall Grade Beam a hint er.lle &Hall ne prelarmed resilientMtumlroua expansion joint faun canlarmIl to 14 o i,o' r 4 1b 2d' 4" es bin* a to"anew. - ASTM DI'751, Latest Edition. *can's I/2" • scale 1/2" . I'-0" orale 1/2" • I'-0" 10. Anchor bolts ,hall be located by the mems of a,template, provided by File buildhg © 2-0 �'-0' I'-0" Ib ,Z4" 18" (4) e4 bar* ed. way contractor. Do not Got:by`hand. for exterior surfaces. All surfaces *hall be witlin l/8' :/- © -0' 2'-0" 11-0" Ib" . '.7 - Ib". (4) e4 more ea. way of Roll W. , ra"e harles K Southard Jr. A_ R G H I, ,T E 0 T �p) 4400 Veteran's Highway'' Sults 11209 Holbrook, New York 11741- Phone (516) 4-71-522b 4 Fax (516) 491-5224 N washed stone Q SLAB ON &RADE SLAB ON GRADE 436" concrete slab with 6" concrete slab wlth rq 6x6 6/6 wire mesh 6x6 6/6 wire mesh - Q Li IN t IN O 1200 AMP, 5-Phase Main 'C V SLAB ON GRADE O Distribution PanelO x O x 6" concrete slab with O V Q 10' x 10' OHD 10' x 10' OHD bxb b/b wire mesh X 10' x 10' OHD y 7 N O o-❑b Oa❑b 171 O O O O O O a❑~ O ® O 10_O.. ._6. ,_I .410,_O.. ._10. V-0.P51-O° 51_0' ' S-O 3'_O" S-0 — CONCRETE APRON 5'-0" 1 .. 15._ Y J Floor Plan °a scale 1/16" 1'-0" _Qz d O 4 J RECYCLED CONCRETE BLEND RECYCLED CONCRETE BLEND C\S-(EREpq W.SO/�D,S g T 9A 43 ' C`O Floor Plan T Q RECYCLED CONCRETE BLEND 1 ISI - 4" X 24" NIGH - - Q" 'fRI1C.IrrTURNIN& AREA THICK CLEAR WIRED _N .170 DOOR FIXED SLA%LITE -- I In" THICK - A i O00R DOOR SCHEDULE Proposed Storage DOOR TYPE "A" DOOR TYPE "B" DOOR OPENING DOOR: BUCK: REMARKS: 5ullding for DOOR TYPES ND. SIZE TYPE MATERIAL FINISH MATERIA. FINISH HDwE. SET RATING Pindar Vineyards DOOR TYPE 'G" A 5'-0" x -I'-0" A H.M. PAINT H.M. PAINT 1 'B" LABEL PROVIDE KICK PLATE B 5'-0" x 7'-0" B H.M. PAINT H.M. PAINT "B" LABEL PROVIDE KICK PLATE G 10'-0" x 10'-0" G STEEL PAINT D 14'-0" x 14'-0" G STEEL PAINT HARDWARE SET sl I. 1 In PAIRS,41/2" X 4 1/2',BALL 9EARINS,DRAW FINISH. Main Road 2. LOCKSET TO BE 'KEY' RUM"ON 9. WALL MOUNTED DOOR STOP TO SE CONCAVE SME DOME AS MANIPACTURED BY IVES OR 51MILAA Peconic, New York 4. ADA COMPLIANT DOOR CLOSER AS MAMBACTLIRW BY "DORMA' OR SIMILAR APPROVED. _ HARDWARE SET 02 GENERAL DOOR SCHEDULE NOTES, DOOR T1PE5 STYLES FINISHES AND NO=, Oct. 30, L 1 In PAIRS, 4 In" X 4 In',BALL BOARINO,BRASS FINISH. 1. ALL SWINS DOORS, ft4KS AND HARDWARE SHALL IBE 1 1/2 HOUR L ALL HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND HOLLOW METAL DOOR PRA1,,55 ARE TO EE SANDED 2000 2: PUSH PLATE R DOOR PULL RATE AS MAMIPACTURED BY HE IVES OR 1521AL S. WALL MOUNTED DOOR STOP TO BECONCAVESTYLE DOME AS MAN,FACTLIftZTEY IVES OR SIMILAR RATED-8' LADE. UNLE9 OTHERWISE NOTED. 51HOOTH FOR A PAINTED FINISH. ALL DOORS TO LC MIK 16 gags fEAVr DUN TYPCDOOR e 4. ADA COMPLIANT DOOR CLOSER AS MAMPAOTURED BY"DGRMA' OR SIMILAR APPROVED. 2. ALL LATCHSETS BHA" BE 'VEST LOCK CORP.' OR EQUAL. PROVIDE INSULATED DOORS AND MEATHE49TRIPPINS AT ALL EXTERIOR DOORS. p� 5• ALL BUCKS TO RECEIVE MINIMIM OF S SILENCERS PER STRIKE SIDE. ALL DOOR PRAMCS TO BC MIK 16 gaga HCAVY DJTY. (DOORS DYV CE-O CORP.OR BWAU 4. ALL DOOR SADDLES 4 THRESHOLDS SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. 2, DOORS MID DOOR FRAMES SHALL RBCEWE ONE(I) COAT OF PRIMER(RUST I144151TIVE) . AND TWO (2) COATS OF FINAL PAINT, COLOR: LISHT GRAY /HIGH SLOBS, ' USE, BCNJAMIN4+100RE P fiJWS. (GOLOR5 TO APPRI 5Y OMs>ER) . of, Charles W. Southdrd Jr rl l ARGHI TEG',T 4400 Veterans, Highway ' Suite #201 Holbrook, New York 11141 ,' Phone (516) 4115228 Fax (516) 4-11-522q White Aluminum wrapped fascia ! trim - 40 year "Timberllne' Roof shingles - Color Bul 9lenna _ ' _._—__ � - - - :- 61.• III I�. _"R - _ ' ' __ _—" _ __ _ __ — ___ r , 2: n __ _ __ __ _ _ -� _ —. _. .. _ .._ _ 1f N i columns Color White ____ll____ s r - ______________________________ ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- II I I �lasS - - "I Flbe5" "Do _____________uble Dutch" vinyl siding Color Ghampalgne Mite Vinyl Insulated glgee wMdows� Light redAaown Jumbo Brick East Elevation scale 1/16" = Ill �! II ' I , I II II ' il I I i II 11 , I I I 1I 1 ', I II I I 1 , 1 ! I 1 Ili I 1 I II IIII ; I 1 . I ! I I ' I � I � I I � I I I I __I__I_I_______-I__I_____I____ _I�_I__I _I_I_�___ _____-I____ _________________________________________ _I I_____I_I I I I I___I____________I___II_____I___________ ____ _ _J Metal Panels Painted Birch Mite GgTEREOq West 80�9�y scale 1/16" Ill 302 y P Front, Rear, Right It Left Elevations MetalPanels aln Birch — Metal Panels Pointed Birch Mite - Color Burnt Sienna40 gear shingles ' 40 year "Tlmberllne" Roof shingles - Color Burnt Sienna I SI I I - , , 5' 'Double Dutch" vinyl Siding Colo r Ghampalgne Proposed 5tor age5" Double Dutch" vinsiding Color Champl9ne Fiberglascolumns - Color Mite Flber Ines columns - Gqfor Mite Li5uldin for hredrown umbo Brick Plndar Vineyards ht redhrown Jumbo Brick IiI _ South Elevation North Elevation scale 1/16" , II_o,l scale 1/16" I'-0" Main Road Peconlc, New York Oct. 90, 2000 A - 5 of Charles K Southard Jr ARCH ITEGT , l� 4400,Veteran's Hlghwpy Butlerlb Roof panels 0.5.75 Holbrook,#20YNew York 11941 8" roof purlins urlins 3 1/2" vinyl faced insulation Phone (516) 491-5228 Fax (516) 411-52-29 preenineered steel Vame preenglneered steel frame a But erib wall panels sidewall purl ns p eon Ineered _ s eel �rome _ _ N F sid wall purlins 4 Section scale 1/4" 1'-0" G�giFREN QQ, W.80Gr0,5, 1rV `P n I � 4" metal studs " a gage v� ras 16 g ge metal hat furring a 24" O.G. F _ 4 Sections d Details /4" plywood sheathing sldewall purl ns n spholt shingles vente metal soffit on furring 4 Proposed Storage Building for Plndar Vineyards Main Road Peconic, New York Section scale 1/4"' 1'-0" Nov, 2 2000, ;1 / — 4 i i