The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-7.-3-3.15 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 .;:.c"'r.,~ <:", :;:111 '("'- /,,:~,,\: ;:~ >'~. r~. ~, ~~"{'" .;. :-..', 'I:-"~ ....,' _., ~..'-l. I,~~~ ;"', ~, ,- ~ - L. ,.~{;', :-- ': .~~~'. .'.' :-.'_""';;1.:"2':8 \ ~ );':.', '::~:.7Ft ';~'f ~"~~ '.~:-;/, \'- c\j \:,hfJl ,~.:';) /:/ ~"'(Z _ 1. 'S~!;/ 0..:" .:" ~,/ -~-~ SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 20, 1990 Roy Reynolds, P.E. Sr. Public Health Engineer Department of Health Services Suffolk County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Application of Woolridge, Fishers Island SCTM # 1000-07-03-3.15 Dear Mr. Reynolds, The Planning Board reviewed your letter requesting our position regarding the designation of lead agency status in the review of the above-referenced proposal. This agency has no objections to the assumption of lead agency by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. - ........... ., We are also in agreement with your designation of the project as "a Type I action with a possible significant impact." It is requested that your agency take a careful look at this proposal because of its location adjacent to the public water supply reservoir of Barlow Pond. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner, of this office. Very Truly Yours, ~~fv: Bennett Orlowski, Jr: ~ Chairman cc: Judge Ray Edwards, Councilman Trustees, John M. Bredemeyer III . SCOTT L. HARRIS SUPERVISOR . .~- . . . ; ~~U' '. ';' .\,...... :1{J' .........'. /"'(1,"\\11 ,~.' I"'~c~-c.:.. '......., ......,,:,.:., (,(~.... ~. "w . (J <' ~ I; ~p!\'(: .~\ ~,r~ . .",t... ~':, ~\ ~::-:-> :--.,<'1;:...: ,'..,.:. \-_,,,-,"'~':',._,-'-:'r: \. ',. '. , .:;-.' ",' ,,-:,~ "I..' r" l '.. ,.. ,.. '~.:-~~ t. : ''1~>,,; -"'~.~,1."'" Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box] 179 Soulhold. New York 11971 FAX (516) 765 - 1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765 . 1800 OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FAX COVER SHEET ~. ~ TO: ~s:._/~~j-/' ~. -=-~~5M.~.M. 3 - 2-e> - c; 0 FROM: DATE: Pages to follow: Additional Comments: 2.- IF ALL PAGES ARE NOT RECEIVED. PLEASE CALL SOUTH OLD TOWN HALL at (516) 765-1800 '. '. Iff ~:\ '.t;- 3 - o~ 70 ~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK "P6 ~"...,,) VS-(f~) -~7 rJs . PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. c:oMMISSIONER February 20, 1990 To: Robert Schneck, NYSDEC SrevenSmnoro,NYSDEC Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold Planning Department RE: Application of Woolridge, Fishers Island SCTM # 1000-07-03-3.15 SCDHS Application # 88-S0-161 Dear Sir/Madam: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received an application for the above-referenced action. The subject parcel is located within 200 feet of Barlow Pond which is a surface water reservoir for Fishers Island. According the SCDHS procedures for implementation of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), this project constitutes a Type I action with a possible significant impact. As an agency involved in approving this action, X9Y.,~ 4mby r!lqu\:~ted to indiCJUe yoqr p!>siti~~>regarding the designation of lead agency. If there !U'e. no objections. the SCDHS will, assume lead agency status., A copy of the completed Long Environmental Assessment Form is enclosed for your review. Please re~nd within 30 days of the date of this mailing to the Bureau of Wastewater Management. cc: Paul Ponturo, P.E. Roy Reynolds, P.E _.__._'.' Sr. Public Heal glre~ ~ 'i II ~ 11'-""'" I.J!d 1M" - > > tl.,,>, ~ t I L..... L p.';L~.. COUNTY CENTER "IVE..HEAD. N.Y. 1180' ..:. PART 1-PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spedfy each instance. NAME of ACTIoN lOCATION OF ACTION (Include Slreel Address, Municipality and County) NAME OF APPLlCANTfSPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION "See Attached" Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project. both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: DUrban Olndustrial [lCommerdal OResidential (suburban) OForest OAgriculture OOther 0.998 Il9Rural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: rnWell drained 100 % of site I]Poorly drained % of ,ite b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcropping, on project site? DYes JONo a. What is depth to bedrock? Unknown (in feet) acres. PRESENTlY o 0.998 o o o o acres AFTER COMPLETION o acres 0.096 o o o o acres acres acres acres. acres acres acres acres acres acres 0.0% o acres o Oqfi o acres acres acres OModerately well drained % of site 2 ., . " ," 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 1810-10% 100 015% or greater site. or district. listed % 010-15% % % 0. Is project substantially 'Contiguous to. or contain a building. Registers of Historic Places? DYes ~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? UJkrn.n (in feet) on the State or the National DYes ~No . 9. Is site located over a primary. principal. or sole source aquifer? Il!IYes DNo 10. Do hunting. fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as DYes C81No According to self Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e.. cliffs. dunes. other geological formations) DYes 181 No Describe gJYes DNo threatened or endangered? 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes DNo If yes. explain unknown 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes DNo unknown 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/ A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. lakes. ponds. wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Barlow Pond b. Size (In acres) N/A 17. Is t~e site served by existing public utilities? (lgYes DNo a) If Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? !!lYes DNo b) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~Yes DNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets law. Article 25-AA. Section 303 and 304? DYes Il'<No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECl. and 6 NYCRR 6171 I8IYes DNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes I8lNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0.998 b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.096 acres initially; 0.096 c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0.902 acres. d. length of project. in miles: N/ A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion. indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 1 (upon completion of project]? h. If residenti.,!: Number ."d type of bousing u"its: One Family Two Family one acres. acres ultimately. N/A %; Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure <~ height; 39 j. linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? one width; o 87 ft. . length. 3 ----,,_.... 2. How Much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed area' be reclaimed? DYes DNa g)N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed! b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNa c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNa 4. How many acres of vegetation (tree,. ,hrubs. ground covers) will be removed from site? n nqf, acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this projectl DYes ~No f/J tons/cubic yards 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: Nt A a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phasesl 8. Will blasting occur during constructionl DYes 181 No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 15 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 3 months. (including demolition). (number). month month DYes year. (including demolition), year. DNa ; after project is complete o 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilitiesl DYes tiONo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involvedl DYes g)No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial. etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. I, suo,,,,fMe liquid waste di'posal involvedl ~Yes DNa Type sewage 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal I DYes ~No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plainl DYes 181 No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? tiSYes DNa a. If yes. what is the amount per month 0.35 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~Yes DNa c. If yes, give name Fishers Island Landfill ; location Fishers Island d. Will any wastes nol go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfilll DYes ~No e. If Yes. explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes. what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? Nt A ~Yes 0.35 DNa tons/month. years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes IZINo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes I9No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes g]No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? !l:IYes DNa If yes, indicate type(s) Electrical and Home Heati~ni..l 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity Nt A gallons/mi~~lt.j? '1 ',1 . 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? DYes I&] No If Yes, explain 10 4 ..... C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? DYes IlIINo If Yes, indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment Dzoning variance Dspecial use permit Dsubdivision Dsite plan Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother 2. What is the zoning c1assification(s)of the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? One single family dwelling 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/ A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? QpA QinglA fRmily dwelling &. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? jgIYes DNo . 7. What are the predominant land users) and zoning classifications within a Yo mile radius of proposed action? R-40 25. Approvals Required: - City, Town, Village Board Trustees City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town Zoning Board City, County He.1lth Department Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies " .." Federal Agencies IllIYes DNo DYes i!JNo DYes ~No IllIYes DNo DYes I&JNo DYes ~No IZiIYes DNo DYes ~No Type Letter of Non-Jurisdiction Submillal . Date 11/1/88 Single family residence 11/15/88 " N~Y,S3R.E.~. tetter of on rl.S 11;: lOA 9/27/88 6. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a Yo mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/ A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? N I A 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes IiZJNo 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? DYes ISINo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes DNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic Significantly above present levels? DYes IXiNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes DNo ~Yes DNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the informalion provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. A I' liS Glenn E. Just for Linda Wooldridge pp Ican ponsor Signature lithe aclion is in the Coastal A e and you are a stale agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Title --PrAQ T M O. """',....."..,,,.,,~- r;::,' is f~"2"" > 1..- 'L 1'_,' :;, 'Ii "."~~._~,",,";".<,,,..- 'j.,}. Dlitft '. 1/24/90 .,. .:. ConSUlting , , . 0: ,- 5 .... , li" Part 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Re';-c1 Carefully) , i . . In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations bee" reasonablet The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. ' . Identifying that an impact will be ~otentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant.. : Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in ('olumn 2 simplV asks that it be looked at further. . . . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever pos<ible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. . The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and. have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question'. , . The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. ' ~ In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instrudions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact thOreshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART '3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change{s) in the project to a small to moderate impact. also check the Yes box .in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. niis ~ust be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change t~~roject site! o DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Any construction on slopes of 15 % or grea ter, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. . Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. . Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. . Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. . Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. . Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. . Construction in a designated floodway. . Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site! (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.~O DYES . Spe~ific land forms: 6 , 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large MItigated By . Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes ONo' 0 0 DYes ONo .' 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes ONo 0 ...Ct......... DYes ONo 0 :..~!~ . DYes DNa,' : n f':":-'- " 0 0 DYes ONo .. " ., .. '" '. IM?ACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Developable area of site contains a protected water body. o Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. o Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. o Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. o Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. o Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. o Other impacts: . 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? DNa )(VES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. . . . o Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. o Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. . Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. o Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. .. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. . Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per day. o Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. o Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. o Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which mav require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. o Other impacts: . . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be , Moderate Large MItigated By : Impact Impact Project Change , 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo I 0 0 . DVes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo D 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 ~ )i'(Yes DNo 0 D DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D 0 DVes DNo D 0 DVes DNo 0 -,t DVes DNo D D DYes DNo 0 \~U=~~ts DNo !tlUI R-5 I' I 0 I L:-1 j DOVes DNo ,. "..,....~ / . 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 0" 7 '.I" , i':' 7. Will proposed action affect air quality! Examples that would apply to column 2 o . Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. o Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. o Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 Ibs. per hour or a heat source producil'\ll more than 10 million BTU's per hour. o Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. o Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. o Other impacts: ~O DYES 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large MItigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo - 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo " 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo. 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNa ;&. 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo ",~"",.,.",-"",,,,,.., ~" ' ~ l' \ ','ij , \ n l'e I - " 1!Xl] , -....10--,.' - ,. 0 o ~,':'DYes DNo ."'-~.,..- c': . o Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. o Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. o Proposed Action will allow development in a designated f1oodway. o Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species! ~O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. o Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. o Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. o Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species! DNa ~ES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. o Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES " 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources! ")Z!No DYES Examples thot would apply to column 2 . 'The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland. hayfields. pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) j" , , . 8 ii 1~ . - . ,-, . Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land, . The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2,5 acres of agricultural land, . The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e,g" subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~O DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B,) Examples that wO,uld apply to column 2 . Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. . Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ~O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. . Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. . Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NVS Site Inventory. . Other impacts: .' IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ~O DYES . The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. . A. major reduction of an oppn space important to the community. . Other impacts: 9 t .,.- 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be " Moderate Large MItigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 I'DYes DNo 0 G DYes DNo 0 0 DYes , DNo , 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNa ,. \ i",\ ":iUj . " \ n ji . _ r, , lJ~1 ~ I 0 lo--.:.. . OVes ONo 0 .....,.....0.' DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNo j" . --- '. IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14 :'-Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ~O DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. . Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems, . Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 1S, Will proposed action affect the community's so~s of fuel or energy supply? ~O DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. .. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use, . Other, impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16, Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ~O DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. . Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day), . Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures, . Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17, Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ~O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e, oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc,) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission, . Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i,e, toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc,) . Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids, . Proposed oction may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. . Other impilct~: 10 , ,,' 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large MItigated By., Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 OVes ONo' 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo , 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes qNo ;. t;'-"r;'<";:::".~'i:' ' \1 0 . , '~cr ii OVes DNO ., -..,..~~. .:' ,~;' (i r ~r'~ - 5 0 j DYes DNo j.t . -r'" . . IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18'.~Will proposed action affect the character of the exis~::f. ~ommunity? ~O DYES Examples that would apply to col~mn 2 o The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. o The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. o Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. o Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. o Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities: structures or areas of historic importance to the community. o Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) o Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. o Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. o Other impacts:. '19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public potential adverse environmental impacts? 1 2 3 I 8mallto Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large MItigated By I Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 Q DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes oNo controversy related to DNa ~ES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Canno,t Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility 01 Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared il one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large. even if the impact(s) may be . miligated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: o The probability of the impact occurring o The duration of the impact o Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value o Whether the impact can or will be controlled o The regional consequence of the impact o Its potential divergence from local needs and goals o Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Conti~ue on attachments) 11 . .' MAR-5 ;.".; '.' . 'rf' Southold Town Supervisor Town Board Planning Board ~ Zoning Dept. Conservation Advisory Council John M. Bredemeyer, II~ Fishers Island Water ~~y and Watershed Study: Ecological Component TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill William G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: PB1'"b~ r-'l~ ~ SUPERVISOR PLE' SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 December 29, 1993 This office is in receipt of the above entitled report (title page attached) which we consider to be Freedom of Information Act exempt because of the nature of information presented disclosing the location of rare, endangered, threatened and protected plant and animal species present on Fishers Island. Since no covering letter or protocol has been sent to us from the Fishers Island Conservancy or the Suffolk County Health Department, this office would request your utmost care in releasing any portion of this document referring to said rare, endangered, threatened or protected species. cc. Fishers Island Conservancy Suffolk County Department of Health Services attention: Kim Shaw DEe 3 0 ~ ~. - ---.. ( COUNTY OF SUFFOLK """'P'O LESSA-Rb -re:. PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEpARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER April 27, 1990 Glen Just, President JMO Consulting P.O. Box 447 Quogue, New York 11959 RE: Application of Woolridge, Fishers Island SCTM # 1000-07-03-3.15 SCDHS Application # 88-S0-161 Dear Mr. Just: As a follow up to our recent discussions, please be advised that the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received a Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) for the above-mentioned action, as required by our agency's procedures for implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). The SCDHS has conducted a coordinated review of the subject proposal pursuant to the requirements of NYCRR, Part 617.6 of the NYCRR. The thirty day comment period has expired and there has been no objection raised regarding our agency's the initial disposition of intent to assume lead agency status. As a result, please be advised that the SCDHS has assumed lead agency status for the subject proposal. As lead agency, the SCDHS has completed the EAF Part 2 as required by NYCRR,Part 617.5 (5)(b) in an effort to make a determination of significance (see attached). Based on the materials and information reviewed, our agency has determined that at several of the potential impacts identified in the EAF Part 2 are large and may be significant. Also, we are concerned about the community's comments regarding this and other proposals in the Barlow Pond vicinity. As a result, our agency requests that you provide additional details pertaining to these potential impacts and recommendations for appropriate mitigation measures to assure that potential impacts are mitigated to the greatest degree practicable. MA'( COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD. N.Y. 11901 r (IA. ,. Letter to Glen Just April 27, 1990 Page 2 Additional information should be provided in an Environmental Assessment Form Part 3, and provided to the SCDHS when it is complete. The principal areas we wish to see addressed in greater detail include the following: 1. All requirements of appropriate Articles of the NYSECL which may effect this proposal (Article 15 and 24) are most important to this discussion; 2. Adequate protection of surface and groundwater quality with attenti.on to the any construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system; 3. To the extent possible. an examination of the existing conditions of lands surrounding Barlow Pond and the potential for future development in its vicinity. The potential for cumulative impacts to this area is of great concern to our agency, and issues pertaining to comprehensive mitigation measures are important to our decision-making. 4. It is our understanding that there is some public controversy over this proposal. To the extent practicable, we would like to have this issue discussed in the EAF part 3. As you are aware, we will await the requested information prior to rendering a determination of significance. Thank you for you attention to these concerns. Should you have any additional questions of concerns please feel free to contact me directly (548-3312). Sincerely, Roy Reynolds, P.E Sr. Public Health Engineer Attachment cc: Paul Ponturo, P.E. Vito Minei, P .E. AI Krupski, Southold Town Trustees Valarie Scopaz, Southold Planning Department J Robert Schneck, NYSDEC Steven Sanford, NYSDEC SUt>t=Il..~ TRUSTEES SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 May 1, 1990 TO: From: RE: Valerie Scopaz, Planning Board r: John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, Board of Trustees Linda F. Wooldridge, Fishers Island SCTM #1000-07-03-3.15 Pursuant to review of our files, please be advised that this project is beyond Trustee jurisdiction, and the Board has no objection to the S.C.D.H.S. assuming Lead Agency status. cc: Roy Reynolds, P.E./SCDHS Ray Edwards Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Tom Wickham Robert Greene/DEC CAC File MAY 2 \99G TRUSTEES P6 IE5SI'tRD John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski. Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 May 1, 1990 TO: From: RE: Valerie Scopaz, Planning Board John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, Board of Trustees Linda F. Wooldridge, Fishers Island SCTM *1000-07-03-3.15 Pursuant to review of our files, please be advised that this project is beyond Trustee jurisdiction, and the Board has no objection to the S.C.D.H.S. assuming Lead Agency status. cc: Roy Reynolds, P.E./SCDHS Ray Edwards Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Tom Wickham Robert Greene/DEC CAC File MAY 2 /990 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD .lI.pril 3, 1990 Roy Reynolds, P.E. Sr. Public Health Engineer Department of Health Services Suffolk County Center Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Woolridge, Fishers Island SCTM* 1000-07-03-3.15 Dear Mr. Reynolds: As of yesterday morning, April 2nd, I received a verbal message from the President of the Town Trustees, Jay Bredemeyer, through his secretary that the Board of Trustees will be reviewing the above-noted application at their next meeting on April 25, 1990. I do not know what their concerns are regarding this application, nor whether they are asking for status in the environmental review. Presumably they will direct their comments to your office in writing after their April 25th meeting. If you wish to discuss the matter with Mr. Bredemeyer I suggest you contact him through the Trustee office at 765-1892. Very truly yours, ~~ Valerie Scopaz Town Planner cc: john M. Bredemeyer III, Board of Trustees Judge Ray Edwards, Councilman Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning Board Tom Wickham, Chairman, Planning & Zoning Committee \.... RECEIVED JAN 1 8 1989 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~~ J~~~': -"'~~'t P1~;1.I:'.;)_~1 .~~~.. ,:~.' ",.. ~:....>~. ,.-',;: ~~~~t.. ~~~ 'Sr' ., ~ $1"1' ,.L.",f.J T ...\..0,.... rf~"'" PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER JAN I 9 1989 Southold Town Board January 17, 1989 53095 Main Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 RE: Proposed Single Family Dwelling Located Adjacent to Barlow Pond, Fishers Island, for Linda Wooldridge SCTM # 1000-007-03-003.15 Dear Town Board: Please be advised that this office is in receipt of an ap- plication for Approval to Construct a single family house to be served by public water and individual sanitary system for the above referenced site. The proposed development is adjacent to Barlow Pond, which is the water supply for Fisher Island Water Works. In confor- mance with the FIDCO Map, all development adjacent to the water supply pond are Type I actions under SEQR. Therefore, this of- fice respectfully requests that the Town of Southold conduct a coordinated review and assume lead agency status pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law. A copy of the submission to this office is enclosed for your review. Please notify this office within 30 days of your agreement to this request. Very truly yours ~~C~ Walter G. Lindley Sr. Envir. planner COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAO, N.Y. 1 190 I ROBERT H. BERNTSSON ASSIST ANT TOWN A TIORNEY Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1939 JAMES A. SCHONDEBARE TOWN A ITORNEY OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 23, 1989 Mr. Walter G. Lindley Senior Environmental Planner Department of Health Services Suffolk County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Proposed Single Family Dwelling Adjacent to Barlow Pond, Fishers Island, for Linda Wooldridge SCTM #1000-007-03-003.15 Dear Mr. Lindley: The Town Board of the Town of Southold has reviewed your letter of January 17, 1989. Before any Town board or agency can assume lead agency under SEQRA, an Environmental Assessment Form must be completed by the applicant and submitted to the Town. Please be advised that there is currently no application before any Town agency in relation to this project. Feel free to contact this office with any comments or questions. Very truly yours, obert H. Berntsson Assistant Town Attorney RHB: rbw " \ r. . > , ~ . I ' .\ NOTe- COCRDINArE: DISTANCE:S ARe MeASUReD FROM u,s. COAST AND GE:ODO'IC SlIRVEY TRIAIV6I/LAr/ON STAr/ON "NIN/JI \ , ~ ...., iL 52 r;'I'EC NOTCS- I BASe FOR LeVeLS N6VD /929 2. - 0- 20- -E.tisfing CcnltJurs .J. x fl' EXisling spol 'M.. 4. --.;:0;-81 PropoSt1!d COhlours 5. xfjl' P""",'M I"".,., ./n: 6, Stdlolk CCUnfy TDJt RN' Mcp 001' 8bc/r.J lJJI.J.1. I' OWNeR- LlNOA F WOOLDRIDGE: 4.Ji'MADlSON AVOWe NeW YORK, NY 10022 212 - 486 -9800 ___....l__.__~ KEY MAP 1C:7/i' /":4(YJ', ~ / "/J , ~'t-. ~,o ~ I AM FAMILIAR WffH rHE $iANaAHOS FOH AAI'Iit7VAL ANO CONSiNUCrKJN CF SUBSlIRFACE SE'WAQC asPOSAl SYSfEMS R7II SINGLE FAMltY RESIDENCE; AM} WILL AD/DC BY rHE CONOIT'm FON{H &7 AND ON THE PERMff 10 CONSTRtICr. t "'-'-' ti. . AA 'ANr . G\e"n..E_~ a~ ~M -POOO>L3(of We>Ot~i!w,,^, '-i~'1. 1I'?'l.J ... ..- . ... ( , SITE PLAN - PROPOSED RESIDENCE PREPARED FOR LINDA ''''BLOCK 33 Lor 6 F. WOOLDRIDGE FISHERS ISLAND, NEN YORK JO 0 20 ~~ '0 I 60 I SCALe finch - 20 feet CHANOLeR PALMeR 6: KING NORWICH. CONNeCTICUT JUNE 17<1 1988 <:f;A'_F' rN F'F'F'r