HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-83.-2-8
, t
THIS MINOR SUBDIVISION IS FOR 'l. LOTS ON '\.lIC03 ACRES LOCATED.pit <>. ....-0-
"ff<.~o Goo' ,.~ at .Co. J..",~" . _ _ IN C<.it"j.'O(1J\Je.
scn,l# 1000- 83.~.B
I MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD)
Complete application received
Application reviewed at work session
1im'L!r:.:l
~~
I~',LI [OK]
Applicant advised of necessary revisions
Revised submission received
1im'L!r.;;;"]
~~
1im'L!r:::;;l
~~
Sketch plan approval
-with conditions
....jJ.:!.jB
(~ll.t!'t :e.tt, -to &11~/q'l
( <.,,, I1'/-; ~-t- to 12/1't19~/
't'AI''1'~' ""'t to '11~/q\'
Q.,,)
.,1,
." -t" \~11'l115
" 10 0!IY
Lead Agency Coordination
SEQRA determination
"j i '''I' r::;:
9 i I~; i~~)
Sent to Fire Commissioner
Receipt of firewe'lIlocation
Notification to applicant to include on final map
/'-/s-'1J,.,.
'R/Z'3/73> Jw<.V ^4Jv,,.J
!?/s/ ;73
. .
Sent to County Planning Commission
Re,ceipt of County Report
~L....~ ~ " ,''- . ;). '1 'I'"~ I.)'
i ,. ,., '.- ! {' ,
Review of SCPC report
(.,-,s-p .I~:LI ~
1im'L!r:::;;l
7-,,,. '13 ~ ~
~-<H~ M~~ ~
Draft Covenants and Restrictions received
Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed
Filed Covenants and Restrictions received
I~.LI~
I~,LI~
Receipt of mylars and paper prints with
Health approval
Final Public Hearing
Approvalof subdivision
-with conditions
r"_,..t__...__...._.. .. I'> . so 0 0
.a.;.UUV.l,)..... Li..LI;i.a..H,. Vl ~~;:;ui....viSi0i1
,'liS J't/rv
~
.IJI>I~~ :>"",,*. -'<:t>'I""'T<lO
';/101'3 ~ -Ir> Cv'
, roi ttd ~.-~~ ~
, b'~"A~ ~
.
..
i ,,";
,...-;~'t;f:,""""" r'''~'''''-~''~''''''''''''''''''''''~'''!Y'' ,. .,
, .
fAr.E'; 54
,
I
I
j
j
, '
, 1
.,
I
,.
.
I ~ . .
, ,j
i
"
',L'
{. "I'
i".' I ~
'-' .
I:..' 1
I. I'
\
,I"
.,
".! .
"
,
,,.
llaEK~6
i
.,
i
"
. ,
"
.
I
,
. I
.1
I'
I', .
:".'
::. . ;, ....'., -: ", ~: .:~ "'. - ;J'''.. ., f ~ - "":'. ...
, ~''''''-''''''''_'''''''''''->~--~'~''''';.';''''''''''''''''h'''';'
,...., , -;." .... ,~~: :<' \,T
.", .." .. 4 'I~ ',' . , ~ ~I
.-,.,'.1 ",'", ",
: ..... 4' ~ . -,~.., i ' :.:.<.
'- , . . '~"'l'(:..'..:;.;.r;;-.,:':) j
'~",;:~ l;lj!, ~ \,,' '\::,-""":'/~~,....t-t. r,"
. '. : '. . . -)"i', _ . <. '. ! ,;". ....,.--~J3;~~-}~.-~.i.~.r:~;'" "'.. . .:.
~~;. ;~i~~e~r t~l;~:' 6fU~~~~~~~:~0'-:~(0~f"f~~r+~d4~~(~.~i{~~ped~, ;
: ,", _ :~_ ' , : ~ ~. . 4-:p~1'","Jf';rY:.!,J~_~' . '..t./ f
TOGJ;:THER with a. dght pe way 16 ;l!~et'lri:'width' eOI:.. pa::;lilalle~ pn, f09~" ,i' : :
and with vehic),es over ottler' ;l,and flOW', oX' tOP!lerlY'. of Chal=J.~1il1 J. >" .. : .
Ilanllabury from the premises above ,de~cJ:'ibed to tb,e,~ol:th',Jl.p~I1,'-': '.': :,
said right of way being at. the. southeasterly,'cO~I\~~,of' the,: pl:elllbes'1'
herein described and J:'unning thence il\. an ellsterlY'ct,l;ection:Qver. ,:',
other land now or formel:ly of charles' J .1iannabury on. the, lIame,' .". " .:"
couree as the southerly bOUlldary line of said preJnj.lIell;, tnence, "
running southerly along the easteX'ly line Qf other landa, now, Q.;,' "
fOrJIWrly of Charles J. Hallnabury and .adjoinip.9: tM' l?Jjemisell '. now".
or. formerl.y of MulleJ:' fQ~ a'. width. of.. 16, . teet to: tp.e l\oX'~l:ii sil1~ ",'
,of, North (Oregon) Road said RiSl1t p~ W~:{': bei!l~ lI\l;lre. ~~f~;t.c~l~,,J.~. .1,
bounded and described as folloWlil;' ....',... ' , ,', \", ,'. .' "'..
.. . [
, ;
;
BEGINNING at a concrete monUlllent .set,'in the nor~rlll'line Of oiegon'
Road at the southeasterly corner of ,premilles 4escribed ,in.4ee4<from
MaI:Y J. Lindsay, formerly. Kary ,J"Hannabury toW;i.1U.AlII.:r.~:Baxt\l;', ., >
Sr.. et. al dated 3/30/62, recorded 4/4/62 in J,iper :5;l.47..cp; 2~?""" ,,' " .1
said, monUlllent being at, the lIoutl\welilterly corner oe, ;l.iiUl4, nO\(,,9];..': . :',
f~rmerly of John swiato~tla/ tl) ,X'unn~ng. ttlef\c.e a,lO!l9,t.P.e.1l9~tt\':IellteZ;1r..
l1ne of land of John SWJoat.ocha No:t\;h... ~8,d~l:eelil \~~~\lie\l,.,9o. "'" ,',:
seconds West 1496.18 feet tOll, p~int/:.:(2),runni!lg1:jlenceJ:;.Q.u.th."lI~,:' '.j
. degreeS 13 minutes We5t liOO feet Il\of~: ol:'c1eGlii ,t.9 ik I?Q.~\:. ',o.~. ~",',L': :';;i
,Ilortlwasterly side of premi5es abov\,\: Aescdbe4 "Cai\4:pp.:"th.E: .~o~~~..., ",!,~j ,
westerl.y :i;ine.of land ot. JOlleph. JlapnlJ.\lIU:l/';,(3hr\l~Il,9';j:;}1.~~iS!Ju~~I~i -\
46 llegreell 43 minute5' PO 5econdsEalil1:-tO a,' potn1;.' 011 tJ1e,:~ou.t~a~teX'lY ;
corneX' pf premises herein de~cribed.'on ~ line .paJ:~11.1iI1:w1tlJ;.~tin~, "::;'
distaJ\t 16 feet sOlltl1erly l!rOl1l the ,,~~ond.,4e'licX'~Q~;,~qUJ:~i','U'" .:;;
running thence Nortl\ 62 degJ:'eeli' 13, m:l.m1tea J;:aat., Pfltf/.',liJ\~.: pi!trll.:\.;J.el; ,: i
.".i,.tn,a1l4i distant, at all point;> 3.6, teet., southe;oJ,:r tJ;W!\ t~.Iie.c;:~~li.'I' "j .
described coul;se600.00 feet more OJ: 1ess,to 11 point 16t:eet': '.,' ':,r,
southwesterly from. ,the course f,irst above: descdbedj (51~nn~9:,. ';'.:,
thence Sputh 46 degrees 53 minutelil ,00 lilecpnd5 Eillit..on,ll._lffiek".i':, ' ",,;'i
,paraHe1 wit~ and distant at, all. pomts' 16. feet. ~out~l'te:x.:1r.j,j:~0jIl. :,Y \~, ..
.,the"coursEl fJ.rst above descrJ.b\'!d 14,400 feet more OX' 'lesliltoa-, 'I, '" '
. point on the northerly lIide of Oregon Road./. and ,~tng'tb.e1\c~ 'P'
;Nortll.' 517 degree1s 42 mfinutes 50 seconds Ea5t to the Jl\Onll!1\ent a.t : ' ..' ~:, .
. the po nt or l' ace 0 BEGINNING. . .' . .r.,.
. _'i
/)
. " ," ;.
BEING 1INP INTENDED to I;e the sam.e premiGE;lI aa,to,li'I1J:clU On~' con'le~ed:)
to the party of the first part by deed dated 1/26/6.7.t:rOll\ Wi111a11l.l' ....)
BaxteX', Sr., and recoJ::ded 2/6/67 if!, theSuet:qlk...CountyCler~~l'\ Ot;t:i!;;e:,
in Liber 6112 cp 153. . " ' ..,' ".
. BEING' AND INTENDED TO be the~Wn~pr~~'~~";;;"t~':p~~~~l'~~'~~~~~e.d,i";
<,to the pa:tty of the fll;'st part bY' deed, da.ted ,2nl67 :.;eJ::PII\'~,axt:e.l: ., ,.:.-::-;;:'
t'ropert~es ~nc., and recol:'decl, 2/6/67 ~ the suffol1t:CQ~llty ,Cler~tll>1 ,f!:
Off1ce Jon LJ.ber 6~12 cp 149. ',,:' ...,:~.,. ..',:' '. . ..:r-
SUBJECT TO two eXJ.sting first mortgages, one o~ each parcel, of., j;
record. ..' .' , '.
.' 1"" ,.... '. ";."
SUBJECT TO any :;tate of tacta an, a~curata, s'uJ;Vey ~YfjhQ"'.,':. ::..;'
. .. .' ..... ,'..,' ". ..1
The wi thin conveyance is'made wi thin' the' regulal:': c()Ill:'~e' of bUIl1ness"':':
.actually conducted by the party of the first pilX't"l1erein,:and' is:, ,~::2;\'
made with the unanimous consent in writing of all.,of .lots 5toC!t... ". ,! :'i'tt,
hold\'!r:;. ..' . ' ' .,' . "':" :"Ij
~ ' . . ~. .'. '; ~"/r:H
. ',;':~.
,..J .",
1.:1t
. ,
..
.-
r' h -. 1.
~'I:'. ~. ,- ~:
, .
'..:
\"
,,-~,:-, .(,
!' "
. (y,.~,"~'" ,~, ' .~ "1' I '
. .... ,...-;" 'f: "-"-::1
," : '". .,:,--;' "-"i;l~
, .,,'_ Fit .'.... fl. . - t .>":'''\, . ,'" ....l~r.. \
, . ..... '. " r" ~..': I~ ,,_~">:.)
, ::.....: '....!. ,,',..' .: ..",Iill'jtJi\H.~l,~~ ';:
,,,, l,~ \i\1~"'~' .~ '''~\1'
.. ,...,"....,..,..... ~..~___~._,_~.___~-;,:..:~.'-:.::-,~..~:?,r
I'; '.,
, . \ ; " ~
. .~ ~"I ':;.i..;' ~. ' ....
. .
. :,;'
,',.',
,- .......
F
'. . ....,.. ~ ~ .~~
.-'~ ,.',
,III
(".'"
..","
.
:,.
/
.
.
'r '~~;''''<~~r},>~~,~.'''':~'''''~~~;'''':-I'l1.~~'i1'';.:--;~~\~~;~~r;.t~~j::>>''';~~~JiZ'..~~7' ~"'.\~..
. . ~ ..;,.:.,.... _ '~:".,.,~. '-" ,~~ ~:~:~..:' .,"'F,,,,!>~~ "f_~;" :~~~~',~~<"'r/k. '-r~.~ :;-;.};.::;1t,..
...
.
.
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT
To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold:
The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentaiive) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in
accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the South old Town
Planning Board, and represents and states as follows:
1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the
owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said
land under application.)
2. The name of the subdivision is to be
Stevens Bluff
....................................................
................................................................................................
3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "An hereto annexed. (Copy of deed
suggested.) Described as parcel two on deed.
4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as
follows:
Liber . ?Cil;3g................. Page ... .53................ On .. ~!2I!2Y~?......... ;
Liber ........................ Page
......................
On
........................
Liber ........................ Page
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
On
.......................,
Liber ........................ Page
......................
On
........................
Liber ........................ P:1ge
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
On
.......................,
as devised under the Last \Vill and Testament of .......................................
or as distributee
....................,....................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ .
.................................................
S. The area of the land is .4...460:3
. ..............
acres.
6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except . .lJ.PlH'!.. . . .
...............................................................................................
7. The land is encumhered by . .tJ.P. '" . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . . '" . . . . . . . . . .. .
mortgage (s) as follows:
(<1) l\'rortg~ge recorded in Liber .............. Pag-c . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. in origin~t amount
of $. . . . . . . . . . . . .. unpaid amount $ ..... . . . . . . :. . . . . . . .. held by ......................
. . . . . . . . . . . . .. address ..................
...............................................
(b) ~fortgag-e recorded in Libcr .......:. Pag-e ...................:... in original amollnt
of .............. uupaid amount $...... . . . . . .. . . . . held,...!:t
..... P-,.,1"-'- .....;,..ff ~ ~
SOi!'l-, ~ ~
f'
. ,,~.-.....
.
.
(c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount
of ............... unpaid amount $.........;.;............ beld by......................
."
. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. address ................................:........................
8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ... .l).~n~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts ...R .80. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .: :
10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex.
cept
none .
....................................................................................
11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements.
12. The land tdac30 (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis.
trict, if within a District, is ..............~'...............................................
13. Water mains will be laid by .nP.t; ~p:glicaQl.e .. .. .... ... . . . .. .... .... . .. .. . . . . . . ... .
and (a) (no) charge will be made fOr installing said mains.
14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . .~AJ;,9.Q. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
.....................................
and (a)
(no) charge will be made for installing said
lines.
IS. Gas mains will be installed by .rJ.~.1;. .ElPP.J,)..G!3:1?:J..El.......................................
and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains.
16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the
Suffolk County Highway systcm, annex Schedule "13" hereto, to sh;w same.
17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the. applicant to be existing public streets in the
Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same.
18. There arc no existing' building'S or structures on the land which are not located and shown
on the plat.
19. \Vltcrc the plat shows propos~d streets \\' hich arc cxtell~iolls of streets 011 adjoining- sub.
division maps heretofore filed. there are 110 reserve strips at the end of the streets on said
txisting- maps at their conjunctions with the propo~ed streets.
20. In the course of these proceedings. the apl)lic:lnt wilt oifer proof of title as required by Sec.
335 of the Real Property Law.
21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots :::howi:1g' all 1"C'strictions, con~nants. etc. Annex
Schedule "Du.
- ".
~<..
.
.
22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be
$. .~O:-. ~... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the
Performance Bond be fixed at ............ ".": years. The Performance Bond will be written by
a licensed surety compan)" unless otherwise shown on Schedule ifF".
DATE ...........!"!~...s.'............ 19.9;'
.1".~~."!-. A ~ . .~:t.~:r.~J?~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Name of Applicant)
<=..~
By ~Q~,. ....~.:;
(Signature and Title) Debora rOij,:;i:t?
Attorney
670 West Creek Avenue, P.O. Box 1181
................................................
(Address) Cutchogue, NY 11935
STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF ..9P::J;fQ~...................., ss:
On the...........~.. day of... .~."!-:t........ ............., 19.~:?.., before me personally came
Deborah Dotv k b h . d"d I d 'b d' d h
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. or. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. to me nown to e t e In IV1 un escn e In an w 0
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that. . .'iJ:l.~ .. '" executed the same.
m~.... . ...;?~~f:,~;ot~~~~M
Notary ie No. 4948216 "
Qualified in Suffolk County
Commission Expires Mar. 6. 19.!> -'-
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ........ .................... ss:
On the................ day............ of .............., 19......, !>efore me personally came
. .. ..................... to me known, who being by me duly Sworn did de.
pose and say that ............ resides at No. ....................................................
" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . that .......................... is the ..........
..................
of ..........................................................................
the corpor:ltiOIl descrihed in and which executed the foreg-oing' instrument; that ............ know~
the sea~ of said corporation: thnt the seal affixed by order of the bDard of directors of said corpor~lion.
:Iwl that. . . . . . . . . . .. sig-ned ........ ~.. '" n::l1ne thereto by like order.
Notary P;;bli~"""""""""""""""'"
...(.~.,
.
.
Mayo 5. 199J
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
SouthOld, New York 11971
Re:
Stevens Bluff
(SCTM # 1000-8J-02-08)
Minor Subdivision
Gentlemen:
The fOllowing statements are offered for your consideration
in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its
referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission:
(1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a
residential building is proposed.
.-
(2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in
the grades of the existing roads.
(3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing
structures are proposed.
Yours truly,
L~O. c~
Deborah Doty ~
As attorney for Nina A. Stevens
.-c~,:;;
.
14-16-2 (2/87)-7c
.
.
(
617 .21
Appendix A
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
SEQR
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. in an orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent-
ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large. then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE - Type 1
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: XI Part 1
and Unlisted Actions
{
o Part 2
OPart 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information. and considering both the magi tude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
o A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
o B. Although the project could have a signit'ic~nt effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.'
o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Stevens Bluff (SCTM # 1000-8J-02-08)
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Title of Responsible Officer
(
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
'Signature of Pre parer (If different from responsible officer)
Date.
1
.,...::..a...
,JART 1-PROJECT INFORMATIoN
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered(
, as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. '
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
Stevens Bluff (SCTM # 1000-83-02-08)
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Str..t Addr.... Municipality and CounlYi Suffolk
Private Road, Cutchogue, Southo d,
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR I B~S5i~ TE~JIJ?~~648
Deborah Doty, Atty
ADDRESS
670 West Creek Avenue, P.O. Box 1181
CITY/PO I SINE I ~1 ~5'5
Cutchogue,
NAME OF OWNER (If different) I B~s~i~ T~t~9H:'8~20
Nina A. Stevens
ADDRESS
c'; 0 Edmund Stevens, Jr. Sandy Pond Road
CITY/PO I S~E I ZIO 10fb
Lincoln
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Minor subdivision of 4.4603 acres into two lots.
; '_":~C'i I
(
PI~a~e C9!;npl~le( E,ach Qu~sli.o,,- ,Indicate N.A.. if,not applicable
A. Site Description '
Physical 'setting of overall project. both developed and, undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: ~Urban Olndustrial OCommercial OResidential (suburban)
1'1., '
. . OForest OAgriculture OOther
2. Tptal :a.sr~alle:})f project.area: 4.4603 acres. ,
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE
i. Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural)
Forested
\, Agricultural ~Includes orchards. cropland, pasture, etc.)
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECl)
Water Surface Area
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill)
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces
Other (Indicate type)
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site?
a. Soil drainage: i:iaWell drained 100, % of site
OPoorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYSt-
land Classification System? N. iI.. .acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). '
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? DYes ~No
a. What is depth to bedrock? (in. feet)
~Rura,1 (non-farm)
46 PRESENTlY
4. 03 acres
^41~R65g~Pl;J:~~e~
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
OModerately well drained
% of site
2
~, -~.--
5. Approximate percentage of proed project site with slopes:
1Jl:0-l0% .0_ %
~15% or greater 10
site, or district, listed on
010-15%
%
%
( 7.
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building,
Registers of Historic Places? DYes IXlNo
Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural landmarks?
What is the depth of the water table? n/ a (in feet)
the State or the National
DYes
~No
8.
9.
10.
11.
Is site located over a primary. iJrincipal, or sole source aquifer? .K)Yes DNa
Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area?
Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
DYes ~No According to
Identify each species
Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
DYes J1!]No Describe
DYes
IXlNo
12.
13. Is the project ;ite presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
DYes ~No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
DYes ~No
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name None
b. Size (In acres)
( 17.
Is the site served by existing public utilities? DYes :KJNo
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? DYes DNo
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DYes DNo
Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets law, Article 25-AA,'
Section 303 and 304? DYes CilNo .
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECl, and 6 NYCRR 617? DYes :tJNo
18.
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes?
DYes
~No
B. Project Description
.
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 4.460 '3
b. Project acreage to be developed: 4.460'3 acres initially; n/ a
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped -.Q - acres.
d. length of project, in miles: N. A. . (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N. A.
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing . N. A. ; proposed N. A.
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour N. A. (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family
Initially 0
Ultimately 2
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 36' height; n/ a
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?
acres.
acres ultimately.
%;
Multiple Family
Condominium
c
width; .n/ a
o
length.
ft.
3
-'-.,
8.
9.
10.
2. How much natural material (i.6 JCk, earth, etc.) will be removed from tI. jite? none
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes DNo I2!IN/A
a. If yes, for what intende': purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNo
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNo
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? n/ a acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
DYes mNo
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction N. A.
7. If multi-phased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1
c. Approximate completion date of final phase
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases?
Will blasting occur during construction? DYes BNo
Number of jobs generated: during construction n/ a
Number of jobs eliminated by this project n/ a
Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
tons/cubic yards
"
(
months. (including demolition).
(number).
month
month
DYes
year, (including demolition).
year.
DNo
; after project is complete
11.
DYes
I1QNo
If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes ~No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes ~No Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? DYes ~No
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes DNo
16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes IiQNo
a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes DNo
c. If yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfilll DYes DNo
e. If Yes, explain
(
17.
Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes I2!INo
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes J(]No
Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes :f9No
Will project produce. operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes
BNo
18.
19.
20.
21.
Will project result in an increase in energy use? DYes
If yes, indicate type(s)
If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity
IiQNo
22.
gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? DYes gJNo
If Yes, explain
L-
'-.:
4
25, Approvals Required: . ~pe Submittal
Date
"
City, Town, Village Board DYes J(]No
City, Town, Village Planning Board IllIYes DNo Minor subdivision
{ . City, Town Zoning Board JiaYes DNo Area variance
City, County Health Department IXIYes DNo WAll water approval
Other local Agencies ~Yes DNo Trustees' review of coastal
erOSlon area
Other Regional Agencies DYes (1gNo
State Agencies DYes IllINo
Federal Agencies DYes ~No
2,
3.
4,
5.
( 6.
7.
6.
9,
10,
11,
c..
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? KlYes DNo
If Yes, indicate decision required:
Dzoning amendment Dzoning variance Dspecial use permit IllIsubdivision
Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother
What is the zoning c1assification(s)of the site? R 80
What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
two 2+ acre lots
Dsite plan
What is the proposed zoning of the site? No change requested
What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
two lots
Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? (1gYes DNo
What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a Y. mile radius of proposed action?
agricultural & residential
Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a Y. mile?
If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? two
a, What is the minimum lot size proposed? 97,076 square feet
Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts?
Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation,
fire protection)l GlYes DNo
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? IDYes DNo
12, Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic signi.ficantly above present levels?
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes
-/9 Yes DNo
DYes e9No
education, police.
DYes IDNo
DNo
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name Deborah DO:~ Atty Date 5/5/93
Signature -;---" Ov.....G. \)~ ... Title Attorney
'"'"
If the action is in the Coastal Area. and you are a state agency, complete the Coaslal Assess;"ent Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
5
.-~
Part 2-P.qOJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR ....^\GNITUDE
Responsibility of Lead A!:ency
General Information (Read Carefully)
. In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
reasonablel The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
. Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2l does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. (
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
. In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This
must be explained in Part 3.
IMPACT ON LAND
1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?
ONO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15.Jool rise per 100
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than
3 feet.
. Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles.
. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within
3 feet of existing ground surface.
. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more
than one phase or stage.
. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year.
. Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill.
. Construction in a designated floodway.
. Other impacts
2. Will there be an effect t'. ...IY unique or unusual land forms fOllnd on
-
the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.lONO OVES
. Specific land forms:
6
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
[] 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
.
0 0 OVes DNa
f
'-
c
\.....
.
'f
IMPACT ON WATER
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected?
(Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
DNa DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Developable area of site contains a protected water body.
. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a
protected stream.
. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body.
. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland.
. Other impacts:
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of water? DNa DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
. Other impacts:
(
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? DNa DYES
Examples that wouid apply to column 2
. Proposed Action will require a discharge permit.
. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45
gallons per minute pumping capacity.
. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water
supply system.
. Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater.
. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per
day.
. Proposed Action will Iikelv cause siltation or other discharge into an
existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
. Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in' areas without water
and/or sewer services.
. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
. Other impacts:
l
6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface
water runoff? DNa DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action would change flood water flows.
7
.1 2 3
Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
.-" .
. Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns.
. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway.
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? DNa DVES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given
hour,
. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of
refuse per hour.
. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 Ibs. per hour or a
heat SOurce producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
. Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed
to industrial use.
. Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial
development within existing industrial areas.
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8, Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? DNa DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Reduction of one or more species listed on the New Vork or Federal
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site.
. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat.
. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other
than for agricultural, purposes.
. Other impacts:
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? DNa DVES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?
DNa DVES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
8
-'-
2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate " Large 'Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
0 0 DYes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 DYes ONo
0 0 DYes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 DYes ONo
0 0 DYes ONo
0 0 DYes ONo
0 0 DYes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes oNo
0 0 DYes oNo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 DYes oNo
0 0 DYes ONo
0 0 oVes ONo
(
/
\...
L
\...
.
c-
o Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of
agricultural land.
o The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land
o The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
o Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? DNa DYES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
o Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man~made or natural.
o Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
( . Project components that will result in the elimination or significant
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
o Other impacts:
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? DNa DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
o Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
o Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the
project site.
. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
o Other impacts:
c
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities?
Examples that would apply to column 2 DNO DYES
o The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational OPPOftunity.
. A major reduction of an open space important to the community.
o Other impacts:
9
1 2 3
Small to' Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
0 0 DYes DNo
0 D DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 D DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes "DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
..^
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems?
DNa DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods.
. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems.
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply? DNa DVES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of
any form of energy in the municipality.
. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
. Other impacts:
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result
of the Proposed Action? . DNa DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility.
. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day).
. Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
DNa
DVES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge or emission.
. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any
form (I.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
. Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural
gas or other flammable liquids.
. Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance
within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste.
. Other. impacts:
10
- I 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change r
,
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
f
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONo
0 0 OVes ONO
0 0 OVes ONo
~
L.-
'-..:
-
. 1 2 3
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By
18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change
( DNa DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the 0 0 DYes ONo
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services 0 0 DYes ONo
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. 0 0 DYes ONo
. Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals.
o Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. 0 0 DYes ONo
. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures 0 0 DYes ONo
. or areas of historic importance to the community.
. Development will create a demand for additional community services 0 0 DYes ONo
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
. Proposed Action will set an important precedent for luture projects. 0 0 DYes ONo
. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. 0 0 DYes ONo
o Other impacts: 0 0 DYes ONo
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential. adverse environmental impacts? DNa DYES
{
If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility 01 lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be
mitigated.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 01 Part 2:
1. Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
. The probability of the impact occurring
o The duration of the impact
. Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
. Whether the impact can or will be controlled
. The regional consequence of the impact
. Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
. Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
l
11
~,fl."
. , . . 617.21 SEQR
. 14.14.11 (2!B7)-9c . .
Appendix B
State Environmental Quality Review "
{ Visual EAF Addendum
This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of
the Full EAF.
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
Distance Between
Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles)
1. Would the project be visible from: 0.1/. V..I/2 1/2.3 3-5 5+
. A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available 0 0 0 0 0
to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation
of natural or man-made scenic qualities?
. An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public 0 0 0 0 0
observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural
or man-made scenic qualities?
. A site or structure listed on the National or State 0 0 0 0 0
Registers of Historic Places?
I. . State Parks? 0 0 0 0 0
. The State Forest Preserve? 0 0 0 0 0
. National Wildlife Refug<;s and state game refuges? 0 0 0 0 0
. National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding 0 0 0 0 0
natural features?
{ . National Park Service lands? 0 0 0 0 0
. Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic 0 0 0 0 0
or Recreational?
. Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such 0 0 0 0 0
as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak?
. A governmentally established or designated interstate 0 0 0 0 0
or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for
establishment or designation?
. A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as 0 0 0 0 0
scenic?
. Municipal park, or designated open space? 0 0 0 0 0
. County road? 0 0 0 0 0
. State? 0 0 0 0 0
. Local road? 0 0 0 0 0
2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other
seasons)
DYes ONo
l
3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year
during which the project will be visible?
DYes ONo
1 .
~ " ..
DESCRIPTION OF EXIS G VISUAL ENVIRONMENT
4. From each item checked in question I, check those which generally 'describe the surroundi~g
environment.
Within
*'/. mile *1 mile
(
Essentially undeveloped
Forested
Agricultural
Suburban residential
Industrial
Commercial
Urban
River, Lake, Pond
Cliffs, Overlooks
Designated Open Space
Flat
Hilly
Mountainous
Other
NOTE: add attachments as needed
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
5. Are there visually similar projects within:
*'/2 mile DYes ONo
*1 miles DYes ONo
*2 miles DYes ONo
*3 miles DYes ONo
* Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate.
r
\..
EXPOSURE
6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is
NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown. use best estimate.
CONTEXT
7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is
Activity
Travel to and from work
Involved in recreational activities
Routine travel by re~idents
At a residence
At workslte
Other
Daily
o
o
o
o
o
o
Weekly
o
o
o
o
o
o
FREQUENCY
Holldaysl
Weekends
o
o
o
o
o
o
Seasonally
o
o
o
o
o
o
E=
2'
..' ....
~.
'" ./
, .
,.
.
.. . ,~, . ~'"
n~~f;~
I"'f~
~~,..J
r-:"".
: ~i;:;
"1"
~ui"
~;.;~ I
Jii~
Q
~
'::I
<>
'"
i. ~ I
H:" I
.. I
~i ..
. ..
,.:... ...
fie:::
:.~..I :
;:. ,. I
. I
.:
i,..::x
:;' I
ish!:
co
~
....
~
'l,
'\
'.
-~
'"
~
o
.>
:'.'1'.'''' .
,
~"
.
f
'~
.
..
~~
~.
."
"
~
J.." Z
'~
.
"
... 0,.
I".J.
".
"rr
. ..z
N;lnii"
, -,
~ ....~'
.
.
Southold. N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED
WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD
Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning
Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer-
to any of the following questions is ~, please indicate
these on your guaranteed surveyor submit other appropriate
evidence,
.
I certify that the above statements are true and will be relied
on by the Planning Board in considering ~his application.
~O'^"" -~ ~ ~ '
S1. ure of property own~ or authorized agent
1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes
(Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined
by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference)
2. Are there any other premises under your ownership
abutting this p~rcel? Yes
3. Are there any building permits pending on
this parcel?
Yes
4. Are there any o'ther applications pending
concerning this property before any other
department or agency? (Town , State, County, etc.) Yes
5. Is there any application pending before
any other agency with regard to a different
project on this parcel?
Yes
6. Was this property the subject of any prior
application to the Planning Board?
7. Does this property have a valid certificate
of occupancy, if yes please submit ,a copy of same
Yes
Yes
-"-
5"'5/q~
ate
@
~
@
B
e
C0
(9
.> ",,,,,:'_~iJi<I"
'"
.~,
.0'
.
.
Attachment to questionnaire fOLthe Planning Board
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss:
On the
r day of
May
, 1993, before me personally
came
Deborah Doty
to me known to be the
individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that she
MARy JAN[ W",DDfll
Nmar~' hJbli' <':'t r f' ,-
"I '-'.~ i3.c n i\le..~ \,'nrk
". ,<,r) ~'748216
(i)I"Jiif!i:-(~ ;-: SI 'ffnik f'
~ _:-. " 'JO'.1r:ty 0._
,'jdrl"lFl Mar ~. :"'G..4..)
~
~.,.;.,;
.
-
.
May 5,1993
Deborah Doty, Esq.
West Creek Avenue
P.O. Box 1181
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Dear Deborah.
I, Nina Stevens, hereby authorize you to sign all applications to the town
of Southold and/or other governmental authorities in connection with
subdivision of my property on Oregon Road, in the village of Cutchogue
NY(SCTM # 1000.83-2.8)
Signed,
. 1/' ~. il.
Nina Stevens /( 111M' \...-:JJ....Lr l(j..,,)
-., .. .,~-_.._, -...--
SWorn fo arri:f suliscrrlie(f Befol'll n1I
.thl~day ot~. ,19~
Nota~ ~f.~bll'
it () ...--;.~ ~_.
01 a~.. . J-,<.. . IIJt
Mi' COMMISSION eXPInES FEB~UAAV 28. 1997
t.. ."...
WILLIAM H. PRICE, JR.
ATIORNEY AT LAW
PO BOX 2065
GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944
~
Po
M5
TELEPHONE NUMBER, (516) 477-1016
FAX, (516) 477-0130
76350,2331@Compuserve.com
February 1, 1996
Planning Board
Town of Southold
Main Road
Southold, NY 11944
RE: Corso Property
I have been advised by a member of your staff that Mr. Corso's proposal has been brought to
your attention. Mr. Corso is going to apply for a lot line change in respect to certain property
owned by him and his family. The property currently owned consists of Lots 2, 3 and 4 on Minor
Subdivision Map for Nina Stevens approved by the Planning Board of the Town of Southold.
To the south of that property is a right of way and a larger tract of property owned by another
party, Steele. Corso has contracted with Steele to buy the right of way and a triangular parcel
from Steele, subject to this Board's approval. The fee title of the property to be purchased by
Corso is proposed to be merged with the properties currently owned by the Corso family so
that no additional parcels will be created.
I have been informed that your preferred way of action is to meet with me for a "pre-
submission" conference. I hereby request that such a presubmission conference be scheduled
as soon as possible. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter.
Very truly yours,
~
William H. Price, Jr.
cc. Louis Corso
John Pollack, Esq.
Abigail Wickham, Esq.
rn ' .
'. .- - ,
"
r, I', l:.; " j
U ' 1'---,"-- ' ...-, I
<, !.
I I i ~ '
U I 1-1:8 5 1996 1[..
L____:J 'i
SO(.rf;~ULi1 -'-nWN 1
PlP,miidG f!CMm ,..J
828 Front Street, Greenport, New York 11944
PLANNING BOARD MEMBEj
RICHARD G. WARD
Chairman
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR.
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
~~
;~JI~~
~ ~)
=> ""
Cl .
"" -=
~ ~.
~. ~.
~Q..( + i-~~.
.
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
December 12, 1995
Deborah Doty, Esq.
P.O. Box 1181
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Proposed minor subdivision for Stevens Bluff
SCTM# 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Doty:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at
a meeting held on Monday, December 11,1995:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month
extension of sketch approval from December 14, 1995 to June 14, 1996.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
~/ 1 /,/ /J/(
I ~ ,I;t / &:vv~
Richard G. Ward ~
Chairman
.
.
~
/I1S
;>8
DEBORAH DOTY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
670 WEST CREEK AVENUE
P.O. Box 1181
CUTCHOGUE. NY 11935-0876
FAX 516-734-7702
516-734-6648
December 6, 1995
Planning Board
Town of Southold
53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
RE: Stevens Bluff
Minor Subdivision of 4.4603 acres on Private Road, Cutchogue, NY
SCTM # 1000-83-02-11.4
Dear Members of the Board:
Pursuant to my telephone conversation with Melissa Spiro, this letter is to request a
further extension of the time in which to submit fInal maps in connection with the above-
referenced subdivision. The premises presently is under a contract of sale. The closing
scheduled to occur in January 1996. After the transfer, the Purchaser may wish to proceed
with the subdivision utilizing the application now before the Board.
Accordingly, we will appreciate the Board's kind consideration of this request and the
granting of an extension. We apologize for the delay in completing this application and for
any inconvenience it may have caused the Board.
Respectfully submitted,
~ ~>>.~
Deborah Doty
DD:bdr
cc: Edmund Stevens, Jr. (via FAX)
roo I ~ D:c-I-:~fL
l_S;Cr" . .....
.
.
Richard G. Ward, Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
South old, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
July 11, 1995
Deborah Doty, Esq.
P.O. Box 1181
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Stevens Bluff
SCTM# 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Doty:
The fOllowing resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a
meeting held on Monday, July 10, 1995:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month
extension of sketch approval from June 14, 1995 to December 14, 1995.
The Planning Board granted this additional extension due to the circumstances
explained in your June 13, 1995 letter. This is the last extension that the Planning
Board will be granting.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
k~cf- ~~vS
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
.
.
~
pI?;;
1'1$
DEBORAH DOTY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
670 WEST CREEK AVENUE
P.o. Box 1181
CUTCHOGUE. NY 11935-0876
FAX 516-734-7702
516-734-6648
June 13, 1995
BY HAND
Planning Board
Town of Southold
53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
RE: Stevens Bluff
Minor Subdivision of 4.4603 acres on Private Road, Cutchogue, NY
SCTM # 1000-83-02-11.4
Dear Members of the Board:
Pursuant to my telephone conversation with Melissa Spiro, this letter is to request an
extension of the time in which to submit fmal maps in connection with the above-referenced
subdivision. With (a) Health Department covenants and restrictions prepared and filed, (b)
an offer of dedication to widen the North/South roadway made to the Town, and (c) a DEC
permit obtained and DEC covenants prepared (not to mention the unanticipated lot line
change application and approval), the completion of the subdivision is close at hand. The
outstanding matters are approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and
the bonding estimate with respect to the roadway. It is expected that those matters will be
resolved shortly.
We will appreciate the Board's kind consideration of this request and the granting of a
further extension. We apologize for the delay in completing this application and for any
inconvenience it may have caused the Board.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~~~ -
DD:bdr
cc: Edmund Stevens, Jr. (via FAX)
Deborah Doty
JJf I 3 Ill5
, , I j
.r I" IJ-I"
.
.
5~
DEBORAH DOTY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
670 WEST CREEK A VENUE
P.O. Box 1181
CUTCHOGUE. NY 11935-0876
1'1:5
F^x 516.734.7702
516-734-6648
June 6, 1995
BY HAND
Town of Southold, Planning Department
A TIN: Melissa Spiro
53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
RE: Stevens Bluff
Minor Subdivision of 4.4603 acres on Private Road, Cutchogue, NY
SCTM # 1000-83-02-11.4
Dear Melissa:
Enclosed please find the original executed and notarized Offer of Dedication with
respect to the possible future widening of the North/South roadway on SCTM #1000-83-2-
10.3.
Very trul~S'
~ ~\)~
Deborah Doty
Enc!.
DD:bdr
L/~l~"
V .\),,-\..., f"c\';-,,'\'
'-1> "d(:/ "oS! -1-b .,\:; Ie \,v
(""''''"'1
/hfs
j~ 6 SlI5
, ?,
.
.
OFFER OF DEDICATION
THIS OFFER OF DEDICATION made by EDMUND STEVENS, JR., as attorney-
in-fact for NINA A. STEVENS, this .24t>1 day of April, 1995, residing at Sandy Pond Road,
Lincoln, MA 01773, owner of the property designated as Section 2 on the Minor Subdivision
Map of Nina Stevens, approved by the Southold Planning Board on the 28th day of September,
1981, at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, State of New York, covering the premises at
Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York (SCTM # 1000-83-2-
10.3).
NINA A. STEVENS offers to convey and cede fee title to the Town of Southold of the
an additional twenty-five foot (25') wide land area immediately adjacent to and along the
eastern line of the twenty-five foot (25') Right of Way designated on said map of the Minor
Subdivision of Nina Stevens, and more fully described on Schedule A annexed hereto, for the
purpose of future road dedication to the Town of Southold, to the extent that the same is shown
on said subdivision map for the foregoing purposes.
However, this OFFER OF DEDICATION shall be extinguished and forever void if,
prior to the Town's acceptance of this OFFER OF DEDICATION, the adjacent parcel of/and
shown on the map as nlo/f Joseph Hannabury (SCTM # 1000-83-2-11.3) is developed in a
manner requiring road improvements.
This OFFER OF DEDICATION is intended for present or future acceptance and is
irrevocable. This OFFER OF DEDICATION is intended to be binding on all present and
future owners, their heirs, successors and assigns.
NINA A. STE NS
-:' " \) (
ot-1 d-~"'-"<..I.\..\("Q-d2. \
EDMUND STEVENS, ., as Attomey-in-
Fact for NINA A. STEVENS
STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS
)
) ss.
)
\YJ ~
001
COUNTY OF 1'1, ,J.), \ '" -,i> L.
'"
On this 1..1 day of April, 1995 before me personally came EDMUND STEVENS, JR.,
to me personally known to be the person described and appointed attorney-in-fact in and by a
certain power of attorney executed by NINA A. STEVENS, dated March 26, 1993, recorded
in the Office of the Clerk of Suffolk County on July 27, 1994 at Liber 11687 page 181 and
acknowledged to me that he had executed the foregoing instrument as the act of the said NINA
A. STEVENS.
- \ 1
~;",' ~-. .\, [' '-<'i= 1 v~ "-
I Notary Public
,--\ ~ .
f. <: <.""-':"""r\"....... ~::; ~<.~-yl
S-,r:r'''~' ~
7 Aln.
u
~!;
,
I
,
,~
,
,
/
e
SCHEDULE A
.
BEGINNING at a point on the on the southerly property line of land now or formerly of Nina
A. Stevens, said point being North 43 degrees 15 feet 50 minutes West 25.02 feet from
southwesterly corner of said property;
RUNNING THENCE along said North 48 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds West 1680.17 feet;
THENCE North 79 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds East 31.71 feet;
:i
'I THENCE South 48 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds East 1661.55 feet;
THENCE South 43 degrees 15 feet 50 seconds West 25.02 feet to the point or place of
BEGINNING.
i
Ii
"
.
.
Richard G. Ward, Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Bennett Ortowski, Jr.
Mart< S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
~
f.~'
uo :eo
~.. ~.
.~" ,...~~
rJ./ .. -+-'<>
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New Yort< 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
May 19, 1995
Deborah Doty
P.O. Box 1181
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Stevens Bluff
SCTM# 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Doty:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at
a meeting held on Thursday, May 18, 1995:
BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the Engineering Inspector's report dated May 3,
1995.
As noted in the report, please prepare the draft bond estimate for the
subdivision improvements.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
11c;JJ 1/ d/
Richard G. Ward 1tf
Chairman
enc.
cc: James Richter
-
.
<::l e,\\tfUlk~
~JI~'=>
,.., -<."
::::. .
~ ~
~. .~
'" ~I' ';C<::'''
"'I + iI
.
MS
Fax (Sl6)-765-17S0
JAMES A. RICHTER.
R.A.
RAYMOND L. JACOBS
SUPERINTE:10E:-IT..
SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPART~E~T
E~GINEERING INSPECTOR
(.H6J-Hi5-J070
OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER
TOW"N OF' SOu-THOLD
MAY 3, 1995
Richard G.
Cha i rman -
Town Hall.,
Southold,
Ward
Planning Board
53095 Main Road
New York 11971
Re: STEVEN'S BLUFF Mi nor
Oregon Road, Cutchogue, N.Y.
SCTM #I: 1000-83-02-08
Dear Mr. Ward:
I have reviewed the latest submission of the plan concerning
the above referenced subdivision. All of the items listed in may
last report have been addressed in a satisfactory manner.
At this time, the developer should be instructed to prepare a
Bond Estimate for review.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please
contact my office.
cc: Raymond L. Jacobs
(Superintendent of Highways)
lliil ----
I._ D r?, (;i} f2 n":':--.-.----
;/ .:o-lE U is Ii \if r~ ,'''"
j {! _.~~--~."---- .
r"
If I,. II
I ..iLl; "lAY - .
i J 4
I '~;-
I ".
- -.'
--.---.-..
.
S~
.
tJ.-':
RAYMOND L. 3ACOBS
SUPERINTENDENT_.
SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A.
ENGINEERING INSPECTOR
Fax (516)-765-1750
(516)-765-3070
OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MAY 3, 1995
Richard G.
Chairman -
Town Hall,
Southold,
Ward
Planning Board
53095 Main Road
New York 11971
Re: STEVEN'S BLUFF Minor
Oregon Road, Cutchogue, N.Y.
SCTM #: 1000-83-02-08
Dear Mr. Ward:
I have reviewed the latest submission of the plan concerning
the above referenced subdivision. All of the items listed in may
last report have been addressed in a satisfactory manner.
At this time, the developer should be instructed to prepare a
Bond Estimate for review.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please
contact my office.
cc: Raymond L. Jacobs
(Superintendent of Highways)
~rfI & "& 1I !i7 f? r:-"
-.~U:;,r'
I '; ,
U~AY-4 ' i
.\'(~
(;,
.
.
yif
MS
DEBORAH DOTY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
670 WEST CREEK AVENUE
P.O. Box 1181
CUTCHOGUE. NY 11935-0876
F^x 516-734-7702
516-734-6648
April 25, 1995
BY HAND
Town of Southold, Planning Department
A TTN: Melissa Spiro
53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
RE: Stevens Bluff
Minor Subdivision of 4.4603 acres on Private Road, Cutchogue, NY
SCTM # 1000-83-02-08
Dear Melissa:
Enclosed please find three prints of the road plan and prof1Ie revised April 19, 1995,
in conformity with James A. Richter's letter dated March 30, 1995.
Very truly yours,
-
'-- ~.Q c =-~ -
Deborah Doty
Enc!.
DD:bdr
cc: Edmund Stevens (via FAX)
rnrn@~J\
\
Ul APR25
L_.-....."
'~~1' : -! . ',\ .
I~ ~~
I'\:{
\",.._W""
.
.
Richard G. Ward, Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Bennett Onowski, Jr.
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
.Itp,..;\
?s
/
19'15
James Richter, Road Inspector
Highway Department
Peconic Lane
Peconic, NY 11958
Dear Mr. Richter:
The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for
your review.
Application Name:
Tax Map No.:
Street Location:
Hamlet Location:
S+e.\I~ bL,{.(
1000- 6:>';J. - 'B
1('- 0 -...., o~ o....~o n -.::0....\
C.u\c\.-o5 ue
Type of Application:
Sketch SUbdivision Map (Dated / / )
Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated / / )
Final Subdivision Map (Dated / / )
X Road Profiles (Dated '-i / 1'1 /95 )
Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated / / )
Other (Dated / / )
Sketch Site Plan (Dated / /
Preliminary Site Plan (Dated / /
Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated / / )
Other (Dated / / )
Comments ~~sq ieview - dJbll[, rev/sei as ~I? VDJR
..., /:3b /'1'::' r.. "orl- ' ( I
I' I
Contact person: Ilb),ss/J. );f1()
-
,
~
r
t
,5ubAa.
~
RAYMOND L. JACOBS
JAMES A. RXCHTER. R.A.
SUPERINTENDENT~ !~GINEERING INSPECTOR
SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
Fax (516)-765-1750 {S16)-76S-JO':'Q
OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER
TOWN OF ISOUTHOLD
MARCH 30, 1995
Richard G.
Cha i rman -
Town Hall,
Southold,
Ward
Planning Board
53095 Main Road
New York 11971
~ ~
'ill ~ @ rn 0 WI rn ,mil
I r I ;, 1I j'
ul I MAR 3 'i995 !~!
I ",
c__.---i
sou: :~DLJ 7:1":',1
PLA~:;~lr:~ ,~~',2L___,,>~.!
Re: STEVENS BLUFF - Minor Subdivision
SCTM #: 1000 - 83 - 02 - 08
Dear Mr. Ward:
As per your request, I have reviewed the plans for the above
referenced subdivision. The following is a list of my comments:
1.
The new 16' wide paved area
to include the entire width
its westerly property line.
as shown should be extended
of lot # 2 and terminate at
[Station 4+13 (+j-)]
2. The test hole indicates the presence of clay close to the
surface. The sub-base for the proposed road wi 11 requi re
excavation and mixing of existing materials to provide a
suitable base course as indicated in section A 108-19 of
the Highway Specifications.
3. Using a runoff coefficient of 0.6 for stone blend road
surfaces and 0.3 for grassed shoulder areas (6' wide -
minimum each shoulder), it will require 22 vertical feet
of 8' diameter drainage rings.
I f you have any quest ions concern i ng t his report, please
contact my office.
cc: Raymond L. Jacobs
(Superintendent of Highways)
c relY/)//
e1 . /{f0ifWlrlz
James A. Richter, R.A.
,~~
~//~l>rfiJL"~;',-
, "\) 1 ., ""-,'-::,
,i,,~....,> 'j'" '~),..'')
'II "~,, ' ," ',_, "'-.*
\1 '~'.,:Ir," I'>>, '" 'O,"~
~I'::> '.. I' ."""", :;.j ,0
, '_."~. ;: ',';,if ~ U
';:;;" ','" ~iI
{t>o':: .,J i :'.:"t.: ;;; J':j
'\ o. ~:"R),.....:;ii.t"', . ~ N
~ "..-. ',' ,.-",,- ..0. "r
'~ .'-.'':/f)- ~ ,,; '..,iJ',,-(-'
'?e'en '. "",).V
, -< _.. ,',iF
Q~";"J
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Richard G, Ward, Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Mark S, McDonald
Kenneth L Edwards
.
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Teiephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
fY\q(2ch 17 19'(5
, )
James Richter. Road Inspector
Highway Department
Peconic Lane
Peconic. NY 11958
Dea r Mr. Richter:
The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for
your review.
Application Name:
Tax Map No.:
Street Location:
Hamlet Location:
Ste\J~N.s 6\u.{.(
1000- 83--;1.-6
\\- 0- '-0 O-\;~ Or, ~O" I':.,~&
C..rtc\.".~",,- '
Type of Application:
Sketch SUbdivision Map
Preliminary Subdivision Map
Final Subdivision Map
X Road Profiles
Grading and Drainage Plans
Other
Sketch Site Plan
Preliminary Site Plan
Grading and Drainage Pians
other
Comments l' ~
;UA.JI (tV
(Dated / /
(Dated / /
(Dated / /
(Dated 2- / 2.~ /95 )
(Dated / / )
(Dated / / )
(Dated / / )
(Dated / / )
(Dated / / )
(Dated / / )
Contact person: ;Jk-lssCt );,(0
.
.
Submission Without A. CO'IJer Letter
T
Date: 3/teJ'fS'
Sender: [) Vo f
Subject: ~-t>Ve!1l6 B/t-rif
SCTM#: 1000- g3-;L- 6'
Comments:
/ RoJ f/4-r} Ct4i.<fl Pro~
.
.
$J.A-6p
MS
tlb
'/5
DEBORAH DOTY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
670 WEST CREEK AVENUE
P.o. Box 1181
CUTCHOGUE. NY 11935.0876
FAX 516-734-7702
516-734-6648
February 22, 1995
rn ~ ~ u \(ti'G;,r
i'
t':;
Town of Southold, Planning Department
A TTN: Melissa Spiro
53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
ill
FEB23
i
.,._ " ,.H'_._~..._'
SOUTH6l6'1'j'.",,1
PLANNINC fiC. i',0~._...._ .
RE: Stevens Bluff
Minor Subdivision of 4.4603 acres on Private Road, Cutchogue, NY
SCTM # 1000-83-02-08
Dear Melissa:
Dick Ward and I spoke briefly on the telephone today about the scope of Ms.
Stevens' authority to grant access across the 50-foot East/West right-of-way on the "farm"
lot. The deed, dated December 1, 1992, from Nina A. Stevens to Louis C. Corso and Luba
Corso precludes granting access for the benefit of the lot to the east or lots to the west other
than the Soundfront lot comprising Stevens Bluff. A copy of the recorded deed is enclosed.
In the deed, Ms. Stevens reserved to herself onlv the following:
(a) an easement of ingress and egress over the North/South right-of-way and over so
much of the westerly portion of the East/West right-of-way necessary to reach the
North/South right-of-way for the benefit of Stevens Bluff;
(b) the right to widen the North/South right-of-way to a width of 50 feet; and
(c) a right-of-way (for the benefit of Stevens Bluff) across the East/West right-of-way to
connect up with the utility easement.
Ms. Stevens did not reserve any right to grant additional easements over the East/West (or
North/South) rights-of-way.
By virtue of the restriction contained in the 1992 conveyance to the Corsos, Ms.
Stevens is unable to comply with the Planning Board's request that access across the
East/West right-of-way be granted to the land to the east (SCTM #1000-83-2-9.1) or any lot
other than Stevens Bluff.
Very truly yours,
-
~~~-
Ene!.
DD:bdr
cc: Edmund Stevens (via FAX)
Deborah Doty
.,.-\
"'. . ,'" .,'."",l, . ,
29.16.3
NINA ^. SrEVK~S, C~S.ljjng ~t C/O Edmund Stevens,
:.incoln. ,"'A U177J,
o.Qy f\n:l Road,
/<t:.I:'/t.U l
$ _.J,/J.>..'
IllA! ,''';/ .
.~AY~, 'J
T/):"J,-r. ',.
\,," . '1"\11
Sl.':; '::_:,\
r"'I" -..
'~
291,63
Darty of IT'lt f.r,.: p,,,t, "'ld
LOUIS C. CORSO and LlBA C0RSO. his wife, both res
Street. ~~W York, NY 10013
part\< of lhe st'c':lnd part.
W1TNESSET'H. Ihallh.. party ollnl' Ilf~' p/lft, in cons.'deraliol" 01 TEN A.NO 00/100 (S 10.00)
_________ ________ ________ _____..______ ____________________ -- -- ClOl:M5.
,,,wi,,! .""I'u'", o' tht U"""1d SIi!!'.t'!>
and other valuable con~ideration
J1~'c1
b"t' r"''' par1'\< ()f 'hI' ~('cnnd flMt. do~!o hr.!'hy 'OIfln! .IN:! relellse 1.11110 'he party nlllu, ..~onn Dlltl ~".. tw,rlo, 0'
s...cct'~sors. and ass.gns lor Ihl' party of tht' second p.Hllorever,
Parcell (As to T~x Lot 10.004)
AllltlllT r,erU,n 1'1101 D'f'U' Of p..,e"l 011.1IlIl. Wllh It'r- hutlr1"'H~ il",1 1IllpIOV"llll'lllli IIH!IIJf)f, ,)IP<,:,'d ~,I",'''', IVIOII
.."" tl<P;"~ )h"l:XoX ll':
St.ltE" of ;.Ie....
as fcllo....~:
CU,:cl'O<juc, Town of ~outhold, County of Suffolk and
York. and betnq more particularly bounded a~d descritcj
~F.GINNIN:: at a stake set in t:,e south"..esterl y cr.-rncr of ;hc
rre:":".lses herein to be described, said stake being the f'o:l<...o'ing two
~~ur5es and distances from the intersection of the northeasterly ~ine
o~ 13~d n,'.... or formerly of Joseph H~nnabury and Rusko H~rlnaburt with
the no(th~este=ly side of Oregon Road:
1.) Nortn 4~ degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds E~st 1762.19 :eet;
Jt...~ r.u"
2.1 North 79 degrees 12 minutes 2Ll.. seconds 311.06 feet, to said
true point or pl.lee of DECINNING: ' .^
40d
RUNNtN~ TI'~NC~ North 4M degrees 53 mi,lutcs 00 seconds West 5&O.6~
ieet t) the approximatc high water mark as lrJC,H~d 9/15/92 or [,onq
~ '-t~~.fj}slllnd SOl..onrli
~.,,, l:'
(.y "'.."" THENCE along a tie Iin"! of the approximute high water mark as
I ............1 )lr:",cated 9/J.5/!:I2 of Long Island Sound the fol 'ow1ng two couc'f'E'!'. and
\ ::..,......., dlstal,ces: $1J~r
., .~~.. 1.) North 82 degrees 02 minutes 00 s'?con\ 81'\44.9; feet; and
. 2.) ~orth 79 degrees 37 minute" 4~ seconds East 10i.4~ feet to
land now or formerly of Irvin M. ModI :li
.3,
THENCE a10n9 land no"" or formerly of Irvin M. Modlln, Soutt- 48
degrees 5J ~ir.utes 00 seconds Ea8t 556.86 feet to the northerly side
,~f a Right of ~ay;
THENCE Cllon9 s,3id Right of h'ay So..th 79 de9re~B 12 mi.nutes 20
s(.'c:-nds o1est ISO.GO fc~t to the Dolnt or plll.C' of l_r.(:1NNl'~G.
Satd pr~:"Is(~!t .HC .,1~o klli"')....1l as lot 2 on a Minor Sul'di....IKion [or
,o;lnc!l St~ye:'ls.
T::x~a:T.~FR ...'ith ,U} c.,~cment fOL ngreoss .Jnd <"grel'r; in COHll:1Q,l will'
ot~crs 0 ~r the follo~l'~~ Rlryht of Way:
;..1] t-,at ccrtain plot, piece or parcel of land lyin<) {l,'~, t)cing fit
~tehoguc in the Town of Scuthold, County of Surfolk and State of N~w
fork and b~ing I'l-::rc particularly br')unded and de~c:db~d as follow!;:
I
\\
, \
\
j......'"'III~_I...."._..!\---~~--/_--
,"
,
B~CIN~Ih\.O lit lli paillt c,n th~ norl:h\,'CBtet'ly &.>-do 01'
".t::'rc the !,lHfIQ ill int-erscctl!!CJ by t:,e nortt,e;'.terly line (:f
/(:tmcrly t)f Joseph 'Ia~nabury a;1d Rusko Ilannabury;
.~ 'jC n 1:\: 11C1
'l11<~ ", :l~1 <)t'
R..'Ntl;~, TH::;NCE ~lor:9 said northellJ3terly li"c of
tctlT.c:rly "r .Jos(~ph liannablJry .'1n~ Rusko !fannabury, North
mir,utes QI) second~ W~~t 1762.1J fget;
~ ~ lid ~(:....
~:: 1E~~lr'~(;
o.
44
,iENCE North 79 degr:!es 12 ~inutes 2.:) seconds St\s-t 6U,,)t, Jc~'~~ to
lllrd no,,", or formerly of Veronlc Czebo::.ar, et al;
THENCE alclfIq la.nd 1l(:IW e)r form<::!rly of VeroL,ica Czc:bo':.:c, et ell.
Se/llth 4f:. c1egcecs 53 minutes 00 seconds EcJst 63.53 feet;
TtiEHCr South 79 degrees 12 minutes 20 seC'ondu West 5';'9. j~; fee:;
THENCE South 48 degrees 44 minutes 00 seccn1s East lei:.l~' fE~et
to the northwesterly side of Oregon Road;
TUENer along
degrees l!, minutes
of BEGINNING.
f".l',.e northwesterly si~e of Oregon R()<!l':
~,. seconds West 25.02 feet, to the pci;'
SO'Jtt1 43
01 pli\ce
~~cel 2 (^s to Tax Lot 10.0J5)
^LL t.hat certain plot, pice! or parcel of lan,~, Si.tIHtc, lying
and being at Cutchoque, Town of S'?uthold, County of :.uff()l", and State
",( Hew Ycrk, and being morE' paC".iculi1rly boundl'd Jr,d dE~- 'dbl';!d a5
t",:, 11O\...s:
BEGlt\NING at a stak'e set iL the ! :)uthwesterJy cC'r'n('~ of ~he
!Jr,~mi$cs tlcrcin to b(~ d.!flcribed, 'Hlid st:lke bein~, tlll:! !.cd to\oO~n<J t....o
courses anrt distances from the AntatSectl~n of the northca~t'1rly line
of l~nd now or formerly of Joseph Ilannabury and Rusko Harnal)uJ~y with
th,~ northwesterly side of Oregon Rc,di GA.7
1.) North 48 ~~egrees 44 minutf,s 00 sl2con1s~1762.l9 (l~(!t: aId
2.) North 79 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds East Ibl.O~ fl!ct, to
said true point or place of BEGINN:NC,;
RUNNING THENCE North 48 Dcgrees 53 minutes 00 seconds Jt 570.48
fcet co the approximate high water mHk as located 9/1r;/,;! ()f L:>ng
Island Sou:ld:
TflENCE along a tie line of the approx':.mate high \.'at:t![ rr\l:lr~; as
loc,J,ted 9/15/92 uf :.ong Island Sound. North e2 degrees {i, minJtc:s 00
seconds East 156.23 fe~ti
TIIENCE Soutt. 48 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East 560.69 feet to
the nort~erly side of a niqht of Way;
THENCE along said Hight at Way SO\lth 79 degrees l.2 min.Jtci:o 20
seconds W~l;t 11)0.00 feet to the point or place of m;CINNINC,
Said premls'l's arc also known as lol 3 on a Minor sub,:Lvision (0['
Ni:1a Stev~ns.
TOGETHER with an easement for ingress and egress in common ...,1th
others over the following ~lght of Way:
ALL ttl~t cart.lin plot, piece or parcl21 of land lying ~I,d tieing at
C~tch09uC 1n t~e T~wn of Southold, County of Suffolk and S:~t(! of New
'(clrk and being more partcularly bounded and described as fc)llo,"'s:
BEGINI'ING at a point on t1e northwesterly sidu O:~ oregon HODod
I wMece the same is tntcrspcted by the northcdsterly lille of Intlrl now or
f<.~r.'"ll~rly ol .1cl!lcph 1l.1nnilbul:Y .1nd l{u!!Iko lI..,nna. 'J::'Y;
fWNNIr-iG '1'1It;N('E alC""tJ !:laid northeo1t1terly line of Lllnd nOlo' OJ:'"
fOI:r.lerly of Joseph Hilnr.itbury and R'JSl'~ Hannabury, North 4!l cIQ9r(!'~!!l 4,4
minutes 00 seconds ~~Ft 1762.19 fc~.;
THENC2 N~rth 79 d~~:~e8 12 minutes 20 seconds East 611.06 (eet to
l"od now or fo~merly of Ve[~nica C,'ebot"r, e': aLl
THf::NCF. along land now or forme=rly of Veronica czCI:>otilr, nt ,Jl.,
South 48 ~,:~ree9 53 minu~ee 00 seconds East 63.53 feet;
...
TflF.NCF: :.;outh ;9 degrec~ 12 minutt's.." ~n'con<1K ','cst ',7';l.'it1 feet;
(ccntinlled on ~nncx0d rlrlcrl
~
.....:
-;ll_
.
_.~
..-
.'.....--.. T'~ _....1fUl!fM'f '~1liII ....... J" "~'UJIII':'.lo'
.
.
RUer :0 Dt!I'd from r-;in.a A. Stevens to Louis C. Co!....~o and Luba Corso,
da:ed
Descr1ption (ccnti~uec}
TltENCE South 48 ,~egrees 44 minutes 00 se=onds East 1680.17 feet
to the northwesterly !Ide of Oregon Road;
TurNer along th<ll northwesterly eide of Or.cgon Road South 43
deqrees 1~ minutes 50 :,ccollda heat 25.02 {eet to L.he point or place of
BEGINN..NG.
f!!E~ (}s to Tax Let 10.006)
ALL that cerealn plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying
a.,d being at Cutchogl.."'C, Town of Southold, county of Suffolk aM~ State
of Ne.... York., and being mere particularly bounded and described as
follows:
l\F.GINNING alt a stake set in the Houthwcsterly corne of the
prcmiftc!I hc~rein to he described, 'laid stlllk~ being North 4H dcqrees 44
minutc!'S Oil seconds f:nst 1762.19 feet [rom the intersection o[ the
northe.utf~['ly 1 ine of land now or formerly of JOSC1Jh f1annabury and
Rus~o Hannabury with the northwesterly side of Oregon Road;
RUNNING THENCE North 48 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds ~est 58l.3~
feet to ttLe approximate high water mark as located 9/15/92 of LOflg
Island Sound:
THENCE alon.; a tic
located 9/15/92 of Long
distanc(.s:
:. l NClrth
i.) North
line of the approximate high water mark a~
Islanc Sound the fol10win~ two courses and
second~_.f~st 74.80 fcc-t: and
scconJ~~.07 feet;
r4\f
TtO':NCf: South 413 degrees 53 mim:tcs 00 seccdJS., 70.48 feet to the
nortnerly side of a Right of Way:
83 Jegrees 01 minutes 12
H2 dcgrccN 02 minlltc3 OC
THENCf: along said Right of Way S.,,,,th 79 de9rees 12 minutes 20
seconds West lC1l.06 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING.
Said premises are also known as lot 4 on a Minor subdivision for
Sina Stevens.
TOGETIIER with an easen:~nt tor ingress and egress in cummon with
others over the following Right of Way:
All that certain plot, piece or parcel of l~nd lyin~ and being at
Cutchogue lr. the Town of Southold, County of '~uffolk and State ot New
tork and being more particularly bounded and described as follows:
BfGINU!NG at a point on the n:>rth",'esterly side of Oreqon Road
~here the Mame is intersected by th~ northeasterly line of land now or
formerly of Jo~eph Hannabury and RU5KO I.anna~ury:
RUr\~aNC 'fHl:.:NCE along said northeLlsterly U ne of Llnd now or
formerly o! Joseph Itannabcry bnd Rusko il1lnnabury, North 48 degrees 44
mInutes 00 sec~nds ~est 17fi2.19 feet:
TIIENC~ North 79 degrees 12 minutes 20 sec~nds Ea&t 611.Qb feet to
land now 0= formerly of Veronic~ Czebolar, et al.:
THf':CE along land now or for~~rly of .~ronica Czeb;tar, et al.,
South 40 degrees 53 MInutes 00 aecjnds EAst b3.53 feet:
THENCE South 79 degrees 12 mJ~u~~~ 20 seconds West 57Q.S8 feet:
TIlENCE South 41::1 'leqrees 44 mln. toes CO seconds fAlst 16dO.17 (e(.!t
to the northweftterly &ld.' of Oregon Road;
THF.:NC1:: II long
degr~es 15 mt nutes
of BEGINNI:~C:.
the northwesterly si6e or ortfl.lon Roaj :,ollth 43
50 seconds West 2~.02 feet, to the point or plac~
;j:t~J""
. ,.~.r, ~','
')..:;:+.\}j'
: .~.~ ~ ~ :\:~':': t
,,J..:A\,:,
I', --1:' 1\ ~
'.,'., d,:
I, ~)'!~:;"~.'il,t,
.."." i }I"; ~
> :'i' ;', "'r
~":'~t'" "1.:,: ;',
',' ,t!,~.\
," -1',3'\--
_; ~ Ij:t;'
~ ; 't'l ~~lj
,; '\."
'~', :i
\' j,t"
"Jb..
\'.. ..'j......
~ .: : t~;~'
..'~~\~.A
f ~ -\1::'] ,~,
'jv". .
;. I' .,!,~
, .' ,": ~~-" I"
'",';: :i4',.~'
" ,."I....',1~.~.,:.f
',.' n,t "
~":iit\l~'
...,t "r;
,.w,~~dl:.:
f'" \.'l.
. I " l '~:{.~..~,
.; ~ ',' :';::":ilr.:j;.~:-
, J'lo, '~,ii'.'~
o . ., ~~;VLI
OJ. "J.~. .
f . r'. ";(:"'~f ,"
\ .' /. ~~;-'~:':
,( ,'JV:
." t.,.
,." 'ij:iJ,:I(
. '1_...
. lo~ \
\ .~
f'"'
~;"~':~
h\:::.':"
,\i- ...'~{ ... f~:~.;
, "p.::~;~\k
., ... ,:t.I....
"_'l' .',~:k:l~f,
~, . ... ,',I 1~;-1
't ,;' i~~~;tit'1~.:,t;.
. "~I'~ '
j_:~0{.l.;
.,~.~'.6"I.J"
~'i:"(;E/
.. ,,"",
~;,.i\':',~,
'\,' '
~ I . . ....
.,'.f,Jj:,.
.. ;.~: .
,J_!..'
.... "
I
.,
e.
~.~
~.. .
')'
1..'
.r
.1',
( -,
It\.
i".
,
.\
'<,
,
"
'.
g-
f
.'
.'~,
'111m 1- .....allllll...l'\t...Ja Ln.....11*flIrll J." T J,_'~-~~'- -~
The Gr~ntor tlerci~ is one al11 the same person a~ the srantee in
ttlC deed rCI:ocdcd ill [,lDer 6~82 II: (:p. S3.
RcscrVln'l to r,ln/. ^. StC1l('IHi" her successors and assigns, Dn
e~l!5cm('nt .)( in<Jr(~~~ a:l;J etjrcss c,ver the described 2S-foot right of
W(,/ and over BO :nuch (( the we31;I:!rly portion of the SO-foot right of
W';'l'l n~..'cess"ry to n~ac:: the 2S-fc,ot right of way for the tenefit of
:.tie o....ners, their' hei:!, succeSlll,nJ or assigns, of a parcel of land
Of an area ot 4.79 acres weRter1)' of the land herein being conveyed.
Further reserving :0 ~in! A. Stevens, her succes~ors and assign5,
ttle right to .increase the loddth ()j: tM: 2S-foot right of way ::0 50
ft!c:'. in ....h ich ,a-vent toe t i9ht (If ingress and egress ~rantcd to
ol:hers and us set fortn and h',reinabove l~~tricted shall be deemed to
include such addition..!!l width, !IL'1bjer:t, however, to said Nina A.
Stevens, her Buc:cess.;,rs a:'ld assigns b(~in9 required to post a
p~~rformance bond, sufficient :'0 complete the widening and any other
irnprovel"'ents in connection therewith, with the governmental bC""y then
h,lving the c::>ntrol over tb:! ,::onstrtoction of any roadway to be
ilnproved within toe said right o~ way.
Subject to exis~in9 and futurt:~ ul:.:lity agreements and easements, and
tI,e right of the seller, he~ successor~ and ass~gns, to a right of
WilY over the aforedescrib~d fifty (50) foot right of way to connt:.ct
w.lth exjsting and future utill.ty lines for the benefit of otllel. land
o:~ the seller, heL" l!IUCceS:lors and assjgns, consisting of an area of
4.79 acres to the west of lot:, 1, 2, 3, and 4, shown as a minor
s\Jbdivisioo 00 the m.J.p of V\JunCi and Young Surveyors, last arr.ended
1/15/87, and ....ith r'2spect to ap!)rOXimlltely 18 acres of Idf,J to the
south of the aforementionea subdi'Jislon ~esignatcd as S"!ction ? on
s,1id map last mentioned, at thE! sole cost and expen.le of Nlna ^.
Stevens, her heirs, successors and assigns, and with restoration of
s,!id right of way to its former' condition irr.medi,Dte1y prior to said
i:;\otallati.-:>n.
"1' '~':'i:,:,!.:if;~,I~
, ~-"'"""'.~,"'.
',"1' ,,(.~. ;.,~, ~.~.
~~. '/,'iI'J ~"-r'f,1
1~.i'ii;:!lfl;..I:n
I'. "'.f~' "....,... 'j!/ "...~'
~~::~:!l!:W.r.~
't~~"h'~"'>';;il.t
1:''{~~r;ljl''i\i!''~i\-.'
li~{:!f;r1:Alr{ "
t;1;I.'fJ'Pif!"'.,
~,':~~~~~':~:~ . ':';1"
fJt ~"J',I"", ".~I
''''''l,..t'".r "~i',
'~J.:':I~,~ ('':~'''''~;''
liYf..~' ~l \,1~,( .!~".~. /j
.fI~,Ii, ..J~'l~'.~'l~,;;
.j'~~'~Jjil':.lr.tt~
" :l-j,~"liI_ t'(:.4'ffA
ll1.......f"h'd.f-'.
1l'r:h,t.~.'i,~"r<I;.
,)"'\';" 'l)i'I:J..
! ~~'.' ~:,} .;.:f{. ,'4:~'S, ,.
,....,~'"I.,,,j,...,,..,t. '"
"'J,"'''''''''';''?'''
}\t. -ir~,\'fW:~~'
'"'.;~~";(~;;~;.(~\'i.'. f~~.'.
ti'~~~:'~':f:~'~... t-i,
1-?t,:,..tl",:'l"':" .,,,
tjf~\j";tK~'~~J~
i1.,;"~;'i";t,t\f.l4hr! .
'1;\,.-.i'....'I'.~f.iJ,t'i,.
Ij,.,'", ....11" ....'
,.t,"JI.t:~t"':' 'I- 1=1
-m l,"~.:~{~.,;j' t.'
'~I. !"'.~Y".fl'~'"
. '~'''''''I''''~...lf.
: ''1~},~i( tf~~:.~, i~~:
..r:., ii:l.l;r.'i~~~~!{\~...,
)~y. ~I.. 'ij' , 1',
....,..,.n... ..tt.
'1~"rf};:.', ., l.,:~!
",.;I;l1,:"",~Wl
it!', I~ 'I' ~~:l'1~~"
"J' .:\..~ '\'J ",,'
~I\~;' I';' ',;1;, 1~~f/[
1"'1'.... .'j, ,~:',..li, .\.
.' \1";-1J!~.,..,.'4h
.'JI' '~~~l.,"', '"'*,'' '."
..... "',1Q,.f'/'~"
.t~.r'\,Io:,};"!I.''''-f'~'li~
1IkY'....(':.(':p.~. .
~ ;'ll;~~,.,~.;\.~,~
:Q~I'\ lJtWi.:~:' :~,~~:;
:'''~~,iil~:'''j\;~l.'~
t1!:,'i,. t;~'.:r..)11:~:~~
w..\..r:.~,..'l'>>\.""
p'..""l"''';'~
.::.~;;.:~.' ~~,~~~~:'
;~ 'l"'_f,t-\~~'~":i
,~rr~ :'~.~~,~~.~ ~~>,
~~~. .',};:..~ ';,'J.."'f!,lJ'n
!; f.'.~,lc ;,.,~...~
"'i-""",14"",}".t..
H"fl"t'."".''*It\i.
.......'r.F.i"~iot!' .~""
. i' "f.,-./~,>' ,,'.!i.'
.,(..\...,.-jff.""\,,..,
. ''It:.',..f'Ja., -;f;.;
~.,~"O\'" . I.f- '. 'j<.
"'7''''''('''.' ":~,~L~FI
~.:~ ~~f,:;~l~:("" 1''-
~""~'~lt\~'lI,'i'T~~
'.:Ali,;',;,:,,",
l>f' ;"""'~"'.r
',~'l.i...~,' ~~'... 'f-,\!
.;tl,...J,.>...t'~,...
..,',o,'~i ,..1,.~.....~t,
Ft'1':.~'1;-'."~\;}j"
;.:. \;~ -,~,.~,'~'.'f71:
'~;(;'i;j~~;:,
\,;c,~~:~'~'~~,l'M ..
~'i',''',.;.IJ.'i''lj:i\~tj'l~jJ
1';}~f4"i ;'; .:~':.I""
'f~d":;.~I' '!i"'~".
I. ",~I";F~" .'.~, .
;;;'l~?:!""::\,h,;., Ii)'
I'(j~!"\";."':'''l,'' '~I'l".
\i " ""f,;::~,;i::;,'.,:,!(
'.. :/~.tJ<d: '
:.I:,':i?>'{-'~,~;!' -'
'l'~ij '.1' I.... ~.l ~,i;, l.1 ,..
" "'::. '''''''' ,. ~ ,.,
'.! ::};),~,}:' l' ,:"y,
:"'.\"I,',h:~-'..;,\;}
\~',~:. ,', ;1" j r,:" ;-
:.!f';~:::," ~< I. '~'.;,).";
'\~~}\'~'" I",~: \:k
'.,.l;','/hli6>ttl'
~litL"" !,'; ~,t~."'! '1.\
",Ii:W"';"f' I',l t
\\~t ,~.;,~:l;,:,.,:tf~
.1,~.;,':':""~hilli;
;ql.'/O,ft:'!I!:}\I""
'~':I!-"~".",r\::,~""I!.1
.. ~lt"""''''Jr
,~,<,..:,,~:,:;,\l,t, ;,:.:
li.:r':\.~';,;1:W','
..\,,':';.I.\o,~r~:, i"'~'/ '
..o.;I,""',~:"",~'ll\' t
l:,I","i"i",~.~",t 'J
:,\':'~:''\' '~i : ~-:",:~'l;-" .~,
d'/l ,.:... ,. ..l~ ,t,.
';l~ \~ \;;:');,.;( '.
11 ..,,}, i I~ .Il! . 't :
"~i{,:.~~'; ..'t~~~'~
. ~ ,II',. . "I, ",r.~.' ~.~
. ,.I{Vt.;, ~~~"~l~:' \
\.' ':"\;, ,1..\..
.' .~
,.
.
".
.~
. . ~',
.,
.' 'I
".' \ ~ ./.'~
., f, :~
.. '~
;.: f ::;~< :
:t.:2.+;,';,;~'L';
l' ""01
~: ~:!), l
~ ~ '.
'J ,\-,."
f' ' . ::: : ,",~
.'.,~ "
. ~ ..; ..~ ".
.- '.;,' .' I. I
.-< "".'" \. ;_o~...; ',"
, I . . ... f ~
.., .:'!
'. ,
."
"',
'.
~, ' "':\ :l" 1 j' .'t~.:
.' ~,' "'~l::';;q'jl.
;' ,~.: \ ">', ~;~',~ .;,;.?~/
, '''i'' 'g'r'"
:d'!j;~\K
',.' 'c I,
o ~:1 ". '''... _, t ; ,
- -',' '.; .',/."i~
:'" .r".' .\.-
", :.,',
", ,-
:,... I'~'~:"~ .;-
\"', ....,..~... '..,.
j,.....
~ ....
"
. . '." .
" .., '~". 1..... '" .~"",.'
'''-;' "'\'.":
,k' '.' ," ".,.
,'~. " . ,"~.~.;:. ;~~.' .:'
'.. "~.l
:l"";\; ,
~ I. '~:
. ,
-',t...,,:. " ":.1"
.:'.
"", "".,: n::' ','
".' .
,',~.' I r." .
...:\....}
i .'( j'J~.\',':'
',:>~_.i::,.:,:;-:\f,~,~.~. "
,~ 'J"
. f ~.:'. r (' '.!. . .-
. u". '.' .) ',_'. ~
' : ,': c: ;;.'I.J~:~;:i"
. .;~.':;~)?.\~,'( ~
'. ",', ~',,', "" .
".~ ";~ ,'\l;,.;'.I>
'-',
~" "
"
. .
\. ,
~ :.,
1 :,,-
!~.
'.
. . ~ :~:<:~t>.~
'~"""'"
,"<,",~j.'- .}. "
"61
"
_.....~ .
lo'.:i
,:1.': ;.
.
",
,
" ":.~..
....
,0"'1' ".1.'
.' .t,." ','.
.. ~ . J ," .'"
,;~./;r~',': '~"
i ~.' F -~., ,f
(I,.. . " -;0'1' ,'c
-";;'i '~.~\:,'., ,
,. '. ~',
'; :. '/";7,.:"',: ':.
....1.; ..-
~. --: ,
-t\'.
'.
.'
-i'"
--.. - --.... ...-#- -.-.
'..
.
ili!lJ8:'-
.
.
ToomiER Y\.II'l 1111 fights, lifh~ -n.1 mlp.rtl'~l. il any. of It't~ pnr1y of Ii'll! '''li! [hHI in /Inri 10 IIn"{ strl'C11l'lnd lOnrh
...b"tl'l'l\Ilh~ ..r,..,..." df!M.rthfH' rn l"SfI$ to ,"Ie Cl!!nlOf IIn". thercol
TOGETHER .....11'1 the appu,\e"lt'" ,'" IInd Milti'll! flSTIIltt8nd righI' of tho party of the fir., part in ~lIld 10 said premlsu.
TO HAVE ANi) TO HOLD tht! rm-.mis", herein gflmtod unto Ihe IMfrv olllle ,OCI.md parl,nul hoir, of successor.
IInd a""Qt'l1 olthl!! PlI,ty ollhe ,. <::ond plrt IOfl!!ver.
AND ttlt' poHty 0'11'0,. '1,..1 I,,,rl (n'll""""I!! I""11h,, J'ldrly 1"11'(111''''111111 hltll Olllllu"t' III '11't","ll "OVlhim! whr.rl,y III"
","'It P'''o",,1'1l h.I.... I""'" mn,l1llll',,.,I.o """ WilY Wh.ll"vlIl. "U;I'I" All AluIUIIA.d
AND Ihll pa.ty ullhl! "'-,I 1'(1'1, ,n cn,npl'/lflCl1 w'lh SI!t;llon 13 01 lhl,'l'l!n lilw. r.IIV,.,lIl"'!I InAI 'hllp.1rty 01 I".. "....1 PII,I
"".11 ',.r.,.,..... Ihe C.).,~lde'ltllon 1011h" (On...e'l'lInee "nd w.11 hold lhf! IIgh"...'ee..,....,uch eon,idf'rlltion II!! <lllu!!1 fund
10 be appll!'d h'!I' fer Ihe 111IIPO'" 0' pitying thtten" ollht' ,",pro...e-nlent <lnd w,1l i1Pl'lly 'hll nmfllirllt 10 11'0" p"ymrnl
,,' '"'' ,,,'1 "I Ih.. ""1""....,."'''1 h.~lllJt- u",ng /lily PiI,t ollhe 10Iill\,III'.' '''I''~ fOl lOllY olhN 1l"'I'U""?
Thf' ....o.d.. ,'l~ ...h,,11 "" '0r1~lI'ul'(1 ii' 11.1 't-,Oll "Illl"'ros" ""tUIOf>"('f Ih" . ""!II' 01 th,.. I".""""r(' so 'l'q,"'C.
IN \YI iNESS WHEREOF, Ih"II.llly 01 'rot' "/11 parI hil!! duly e.l!'culed ttu.deed '~ndIlY and '1'''''' '''''''llh"'II'' wnhnn
.. ....lS~~~. Of . J 'J 1,(. ^ \ If ('..11-.....-.-.
/ ..l' 1/ / / s3?' f \.1- w,
I :/<//Ij./ / "-' ".
! j' I / '....'" 1'_ ! Nina A. Stevftna
;'1,' ,>/.1 .,/.' I ~ " ~~_;:;~nd Stevene, Jr" as "torn.y-
/. ;: /,1
/".,-
~.~
1tL.1
/:"'::..
.t ~<' :.
~ . ,'~ '
.J.:
."'''1
''.:'F
J, :) ..
~.(~,~:
~;~;,r~:i
~ .' ti',! -J;.-:
r'I'~ ~ 'f;. jt~:~'lt"'J
,'r ~, " ' '''I~il, ~
I ',~". .' .....;.~i,~. ',i
'. .'; ,W ';
, '04':[, "
., >, .. '\,:i.~ .fl
. ~ t' "
. H';',:':':~";;
.. i~. j~":', ~ j
, " ' . :': ,;~'.; ;:
':,,/ ; .._~,'~ :.'':I1'.J
;.' . ., ;i," I
. ,;"
, ...... ,
.. . t ~ *.;.' "
,~) ": rF':~!:':
",," ~\';':~l:.}";: .!
! '1'.' ....;,'..~."......!
" ,:' -" ...~.,. ')" ":.' '~. .j
" ,",/I . I,
. " -1.,:.:tA~" .
, . ....,:.
;, ;:~{[t~
~ . ':.st~
I. ':/:;: .:,":-:7';.t...
~( ~ ~>"'_ ~;~1!.!j:~:.
. "). ~. t.. (~~~.,.;....\
),,~,:.~:~::;].~
I)',
."
.'
.'.a.
"
:~
L'.
'J,"
~"
,
'.
..~:~i:;,
~'{f'~~'- .~
" ~..;t;);~'.~ '.
"",' .~
~,',:~
,"'p ',1 I,
.. . ""~"';
. :. ~
. . I
~ " '\.", I
;."..~I.' &:~..~ I
-,";,_.":.:,:. .~.
4';j./,'.".
" ';\!?';
.T'~'I'
,.:/'(1<;
C, ,l
. ;C'#.
,''',:... "
. .,::T.. '.,
'. ~ ..
.....,
, '..-/~"
!
. (l';. ';:~:~,
L.
!J
f.
'I
"
,
,
".
, .
,...-.
.,
.~.-
,,:,"';.'
I,J I
~.:~:..~~. y~~
':'~".l:",
,."::"-'::
"I~;'<. "
.'.' I,:.~.,~~;:..
.. I',
. .~~
,.
~'rlllill>t.Wllll~~ I II .. lal..'
JIfllIlWWf1'!r.J'R- IT 8'.~"'U"llI' 1 - ~
. .
1l629~~SQ7
STATE OF NEri YORK)
) 5S:
C()U~TY or SUf'?QLK)
On th,e 1st d,5Y c De('(~mbcr, 1992. bcl~on~ me pet.son.ll~~ ClIme F.Dr"!1ND
STE'JENS. JR., to me <no....n lln.e kno....n to me ,~o be tl.C' indi....ir..,1I1
c:leflcribed hen~ln .'lnci \hc cx("clJted the! !orego1n(j 1nstrum'~nt and kno....n
to me to bn the att,1rney-in-fact of NINA STEVENS, t1e individual
described herein and, as her Ilttorney"'in-fact, executed the f'",me <tnd
acknowledged tho!llt 11e eICecuted th~ said instrument as the Act ..nd deed
of said NIN~ STEVEN"-i. t'i v1rtuo of Durable Po.....er of Attorney dated the
19th day of "'pr 11, 198 S, whictl Po....er of At torney was rer:orded in the
Suffolk County Cled;.ls O:::fice on .a.u.;ust 1, 1988. in Liber 10657, page
63.
.xi cv..4~- ''f)'J
Notary Public
SAHORA M. COOPER
Hm_" Putlflc. St.1. of N..... Yon.
No. 410'478
o....'H'-<i In SwfWl County
~__Sl,lt04
(/
'-_~-_:jl:J..l_,"-
ilartlain an~ ~alr tlrr~
"[CTION 83.00
r'l'''ICIt. 02.00
, 010.004,
010.005, 010.006
County of suffolk
Town of Southold
Co..nant Against G'lnto,'1 Actl
WIl.
TttI.No
,~c.(l:'j (111
/~,
. .....~
~ l.?,1~
~..... I.
"Irs ,.1 ~;
-:~~ '.~, '-J;.
'qo' :;~ -;;,1.
~.. '~
",I. .,.;_ ... ,
'~~.~Charlea L. Weintraub,
Lib ',' l.offmnn I Pollok
~/ ~60 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016
Esq.
COUNTY OR TOWN
Nina A. Stever0:3
~.co'd-<lll il'looq"n' o'
.Ile US/\ InsurtlflW
Corporation c' N~~w york
METu~JIl BY MAll TO
10
. ,'ui5 C. Corso and Luba Corso,
hiS wife,
SI_,.,'oomollll'....o.'
IM'lIofr"'.Un,t.._.,...
o."'_-"b<t'
T ,lie USA InSUtfHlce
CorporallOn 01 New York
I
!. ;
~
~ 'i
~ .
n
.
i ~
i ~ ~
" ,
~ i:....
,. ~
~~
~ .i(
..:. ~ .,
'':'" .., ~ ~ tl
-, . & ,/
,.
., Ii' .J
N; /:.
..
,
,~
"'1
I,,",
>'J.l)" '''''.i
~:'r.19!1~"'irr,(
:_\I:~:w),'.:,I{~LlI
t: .'7" ~'l'j~/'
"."'.,,,.r,~' 1'1."'"
'it'...),.',. ,.' f.'
. ',.tll.~. ,\-" ,t. :,
..,.".."'>1"
~,.y';+~'li ..../.'~~.~,.~.
.l~/~"'~l. :,. }fdt". ,~"
{' ~:'-f"!,'.'.-t!lt'.I~.\
,,;,~. /'1'" ~}J/.'trli.
I',',\'! I'i"!olf'
",1,.'. .1" '.'~ .' "
~~~i')j; ..\{;'~~f'
'1'<'~o:~rji'i~I? ..1
"~, :l~,i;"1:.1.~',,:,
'1""tr~l'H:i
'AI'.'I::."i'.-'ir.J,
:', 'l'J" ~;' . 1'1~'~'."",
1"'~!.~yr-1',!';'~
-j 10 '.. . ,. ~ if.1"~
':,,:~, "'.f,' .-", , r.
~....\':\(W...' "
'i 'i,.;':'" ';~...;:~ jJ';~
.~~ .{.-~:f: "\...f.,;~).,: '1
E~,~;r.:i::~{~f~;~
:~:l~{ !11;!.'.~.h'.~l~1
"i,,~..,,!:Htl~. ,"~
'.' ....:".1.;,...1.,,9'..,
~,'~ 1';~~~/,i/t~~i.&"
;:.,:t ~",\:" J;i.;;)~i,.i'
,~,Jf.l.;,,'L~'''' ".
!]r.' '~"':"'~.!.i:,~,:"',,W-.'
~I~'!l"};;t. ~~.~~:;rcs:
",,..(:,,," .'~;'"
.':..';.... a.',;,;
"('1).~"i!: "4:' .'
)~;1j ~~r,:~~j {fl \
;.\ol~rt!;.,,: ~,;,,::"~~f"
:'l"'l'J;~,\i~,r::~J .
."......,.1'.... -
j....tt.~'t\i r~1i;~ .
f.i'f.t.jt:.,.;,t~::r;il\ ~
'\:": ~".. '-I~': ~r.~i4~
'}!')~',,::;"':.':! ""',r.:..',~
,.".~ ~~~.. :t,,,;t,~
:1....,,',',\,:....,;.\..:.
1~7:':\:i:..\j:;J:vi~.:~
11~./JJ;j~:;l.t:li: f
~':"i~r~( ~ 'to .4~
.~.t..'I',l.,.,:-,.~t...;\
.o~.!f~~...:~~~y,'
;~'t::f:~;: f{!; ~{(1
..'::,,~..I,'"i'.":'.,\".''(. :.
!'~f:~ :;.'j~j'1:':-:t.
:J~_~I./<;i,..'.".I~_..J"
...,i''''':-O'"""
'.X.... '1',,'i""I~:~-'
.,. ......,....1"..'
. '.1:\'..',.:1:1.1.....'4,
.~'i,.,"..;;.',/jl-.'rt\'f..:
I".lJ','J...".'j.;t.,..
~ ',I'..~':':~L,; ,
\::~;:~1 ~'i' f\ '.'\~~'~
_:'.o~W-J~' ,,~~:l:~;"
~1"'J.~Cir.,~.,Ii.', "i~l~
:'l'~'l:.I'\""';"'.
I,'. \I"",. 'l""l
" ~.. 'I ~~
;.'t 't ';>il" ~.'\.-,
"!i;j"I"l,"((,l}
t;~!J'~~;~'~'!Ii~~(fi;
,.....",I..hfr."
';,'.':II..,.,'.-l\Oif.1[i
~'!~" ~"I"<.','r" .
~~'l.n~~,;""~.'~:I~: .:
:VI;;,\",!'I"~::' .'"
). . ,,' . ~, . ,'t.
; .{.$:,~'I~. ~;{r)l. ~~~,
t')'f;";~.;::I!.i.,"
~"l'~:"''''''''''
,~'~!~I\: "i-:\"II'!."('~'~
,,,,' ,.....~.I"
~;' I"" c't '.\".'.. ",: "
:It ,~,:' ~I,-/t,';."
.!-: ~~.y;1; ,!~~~*';,:,
, "'.~'~,,~_\~,S"
:_~,!",.~',.~,' ..,Iht.t:<.,.
.~t:!"'i;':');j;t.,',"
r:\;1~,~~~~J:*~{~, '\
"""/'J"\'I".It.
'i;;~:"f,;,~. Y\,f;~:'"
II t\'~!;',(it.,~!jl-;r
.I~,\,~,~:t',:lf :I'.i~,
It':.~':,,'.~'):'i ,;~,
'~\'.::' r ',' t!;,~!..: ':.
'i','':,.~~ l~~":,"~."
"~i~? ~,y.t~n.'~ ~,
i ~:~.:~: I,' _ -r .,'", >'-'\Ol
'I'f,'f"'.!" ~.I:~. ~II'
, ,,', ,", ~, ,11... ..'
. i'''. ." "', " ~." ,,/,.\
';'~I I" 1",I~..Jr,"~",
,'1'j" t-.~ '~j'I'r.' f.
:.~~l.~', ,~J,:.,i!J"i'~
,~:'1'" ,'.:, ,,;. "'f ,,~.
, l,' "~ ~'. . . .t ,'r' ,~,,"
1~11'a'~',"'f II.
'.l'\'''''l.\'
., ..,: . : '.~,' '..;{,l',"
. " ".1',. ,; ~ .",
'.~tltit,";~',;h I.,.:,~
CI,:i;~):'~+~'i';
..'_l!,":'.}'i,.f:""I";1"";~
i: 't'."..~,.' .".fn'
l"~'(~l ,ilL '.:~~, ''i'
i'1\Jti~ '.:It. ,~\".
,:~'I.'J'I','~'" .,t'b~:l
,~f,.. ',l"~""IIo'
;1 fP'r,~.t':l' ''','t
"~r~.il.J~}'t$H
hh"'~I.rt'~,1,I~'li
,(-) ,.''''~I't,j ~
fd','-'_',.hl..'t;O,' t~.~
."o.:"~"!I't'" I .,'
.~ ,""" '\i~"'" ,.!
,;"lrV '~l:,~,.',\'
,~.,Iit"~~;';"~~':~ ~
.. :.\~-"i>jh..,,{~t"
~,~~~J:,-~;,..~.',J.' ,
." ., '\'~.' l!;," '
DEBORAH DuTY.
E':';(J.
.TEL
tW.SI
-7' :~ J - -: 'I
.
r t '~i
1 . l '~! F . 1~1 ~
_ ';,:2t iJ,l"
,~( .~
e(:"
DECLAaATION OF COVEN A:'.' i 'S ,'hlll RESTJI:JC' 11:1' \ ;;
THIS DECLAMTlON made by EOMlIY) srEYENS, J.R., IS it :> Ih!)'-ir,-IKI for
NINA A. STEVENS, this _ day (,f _ ... ____ 1995. residinl ~: ; ,t,I:' P.e'lld Road.
Lincoln, MA 01773, hereinafter the "DECLAR.Al \ T; ,
WHER.EAS, DECLARANT ili owmr of 1" l f'lOpe 'ty desiSMtc I I;.' ::,:,t;(,n 2 {In the
Minor Subdivision Mllp of Nina Stevc:ns, approved'~' til: S'>llthold Planr.ln;;: I c rd on tie 28th
day of September, 1981, at Cl.llchogue, Town of ,":lthDU, ;;:tate of'"ew yO' ':l<'r'~inaft~t the
"Map"), covering the premises at Cut'hoguc, 'lou, : ot Sou:hold, Count' ::.1 ;'.,I'!o]k. Stute of
New York (SCTM # 1000-83-2-10,3) which prop";,,. I c,ln':iSlS of an llre'l If It 1, 'I' 'K:!matel} 17.9
acres and slIid lands herein being more particularl;.- I ese:'tllell; and
WHEREAS, it is DECLAR.ANT's intenticw that ':he '~ertain Jancl~ COil I" lng of ,In area
of approximately 4.5 acres and belonging \0 I)ECL11 RA \; r 10 the w~st c . lb." :1, )jl~ct premises
be subdivided into a minor subdivision conSBting [I' no'; J'lOre tJU\ll tll,'O ( !) Ii ~ 'c:::1tiallus;
forth :
NOW THER.EFOR.E, the following ces:rib:, III,I(IS ,!hall be 1'~s1::ri :t:rc !; 1l1:r'~ll1aft'el' set
RF.:GJNNING lit a concretc monun>n! S,~t 'Ill the norther)) 11.11" :01 Il)r~.aon Road
at the southeasterly corner of t,( pnrlllses herein d :&::.1 i ~ I and H the
southweSterly comer (,f land ::lOW (',' for,inerl:' of Jolm SlIlal<::. '~
RUNNING THENCE South 57 deg . ~s ,L:: minutes 5D !;e :01'1' 1,1 't'SI ale lIi~ the
nonherly line of Oreg'lll Road 366" I felli,
THENCE South 43 degrees 15, nUl'" (I[) secoJ:ds '\":"1 IS:II lIlong 1he
northerly line of Oregon Road 1:)4;' ~ f.,:,:1 tf land now 0 ' 1'0- :11"1:( (If },\seph
HlInnaburyj
THENCE North 48 ,J~:grees 44 ; II i lU1Cf. 0) seconds \ 'C!il 11.],g Mlill last
mentioned land 1762.)') feet to th,~ 11: 1hl::I'::1 side of a Rial' of 'J, V fttld t:: I.md
now or fonncrly of Loulls C. Com, i Id [:.Ibit COrliOj
Il~)'~;- ii,'
I JJr ~EB ~~-~i9S~
I
THENCE along slIid Right of Way (:': NIl!1h '19 degre::s I: fill r It,,!. 20 sec\lads
East 461,06 feet along :and now or'illllell;.- or Cor~o lIocI b,l j \ II h 11J dl!grees
12 minutes 20 seconds Easl 15:),00 II!' t alollg land now or om (<! I']' 1)1' Irvi:1. M.
Modlin 10 land now Or fOl'merly of " ! 'rOll ka :~zebotal';
i ~"','
i
_--l
SOUTHOLD TO'!!i't
PLANNING BOAED
THENCE South 48 degree~ Sf: mill]}:, sO:: ::ecl>nds Ba'i! all ng ; if land l1')W or
formerly of Czebotar 1494.96 feet 1,:, he Jl,)hll or place of B.E C I:INfNG,
DECLARANT does hereby warrant, COVenlJI i ! tld 1:1)l'f.sent that thl~ oll<!, 'i,g cumli''''Jls
shall run With and apply to the aforedescribcd lands.
1. Access for Ingress and egress if; common Wli I oLlH!rs to the Easll\ Ie,;! il:y toot <~I)'>"
right-of-way depicted on the MaIl (the..Ea~I;;;\:stright-of-way..)shlll.IIi~..llmed 10 the
D~BO.~'~f-: Dr_'T I', Esel.
TEL NO.516-734-770L
~
-_.~
-
.
-tC
1.1 F . I,::.
parcels of land to the north and west of the premiS"5 (CII'I I)' <:I'lsl!'II:: I ~Il
#1000-83-2-10.2, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6 and 11.4).
2.
Access for ingress and egress In conunon with others I :> the r;'
(25') right-of-way depkled on the Map (Ihe "NorlhfSc.1 h I'i:
to the parcels of land to Ihe norlh and west of the P 'enol;'
SCTM #1000-83-2-10.2, 10.4, 10,5, 10,6 and 11.4)
:IIS:JJlhl'.:1 ',.fj
:.f..way") ; i 1
curl' mll~' <: I
t
I<.r I I
gnr
DECLARANT does hereby funher warrant, co venal t 3n,' r" w;ea' thAI II fOt'
covenants and restrictions and agreements shall bind the Undtr"jgll~d '~r 111lirs, :J: : SIC
assigns, and any and all person or persons who shall succeed .e the c"ersh:p (:1 :.1: )1' ';
shown on said aforedescribed premises in said minor suhdiv, lion b)' "lnsfer or :1 ~ '\I'i1
.:1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, DECLARANT has caus ~d hi!' -~ all:! s,~ II ( Ie I '
this day of , 1995.
'-NINA', I,
fli' r:-< s
EDMUND 1:1'R,:rE:';'. .n~~~;':;:; ,,111 /
Fnu 'Jr NINA 01, Tl8:' f"';
STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS
COUNTY OF
)
) IS.
)
On this day of ,1995beforemeper80nallyclnlej!:[J~'.U:NT.J STI:'I'
to me personally known (0 he the person descrihed and apponted Ill: : Ilc;y..i n.fa , ' i
certain power of attorney executed by NINA A, STEVENS, dnel [. i.'ch 26, 1'1:;:
in the Office of the Clerk of Suffolk County on July 27. 19 ~,I a: L II' Il587 . Ii ~
acknOWledged to me thai he had executed the foregoing inslmr en! II' 'Il Act of I i'~ .
A. STEVENS.
'is. I
UtI; ,
rt~;
J8
cl r
.__._~,~ '~-_____"N~' .__...
~\. i ,":1 ~ 1 i; , {
~:,
2
DEBCIC'~W ...: tT'"
.
I c.\- ,\;~ .~'~:~,-~~~4-':~~1~,1~'
.
F f t:: 1 :-, , ~I :-, 1 ~ : .:: I~I r-'. 1_ 4
OFFER OF DEDICATION
THIS OFFER OF DEDICATION made by EDMUND STEVENS, JR.. as attorney-in-
fact for NINA A. STEVENS, this _ day of , 1995, residing at Sandy Pond
Road, Lincoln, MA 01773. OWllel' of Ihe property desigllated as SocliulI 2 un the Minor
SubdivIsion Map of Nina Stevel1S, appl'Ove<1 by the Southold PlannIng Board On th" 211th day of
September, 1981, at Cutchogue, Town of SOlltho]d, Slate of New York, covering the premises
at Cutchogue, Town of SouthoJd, COUnty of Suffolk, State of New York (SeTM If 1000-83-2-
10.3).
NINA A. STEVENS offers to convey and cede fee title to the Town of' Solltholdot' the
an additional twenty-five fOOl (25') wide land area immediately adjacent to and along the eastern
line of the twenty-five foot (25') Right of Way designated on said map of the Minor Subdivision
of Nina Stevens, and morc fully dcscribed on Schedule A annexed hereto, for tb~ purpose of
future road dedlcallon to the Town of Southold, to the extent that the same is shown 011 said
subdivIsion map for the foregoing purposes.
HOWever, lhis OFFER OF DEDICATION shall be extinguished and forever void if,
prior to the Town's acceptance of this OFFER OF DEDICATION, the adjacent p~rcel of land
shown on the map as nlolf Joseph Hannahury (SCTM # 1000-83-2-11.3) is developed in a
manner requiring road improvements.
This OFFER OF DEDICATION is intended for present or future acceptance and is
irrevocable. This OFFER OF DEDICATION is intended to be binding on all present and
future owners, their heirs. successors and assigns.
NINA A,J STEVENS
!
EDMUND STEVENS, JR.,'&S Attorney.tn.
Fact for NINA A.. STEVENS
STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS
)
) ss.
)
COUNTY OF
On this day of . 1995 before me personally came EDMUND STEVENS, JR.,
to me personally known to be the person described and appointed at!omey-in-fact in and by 1\
certain power of allorney executed by NINA A. STEVENS, daled March 26, 1993. recorded
in the Office of the Cler}~ of Suffolk County on July 27, 1994 at tiber 11687 page 181 and
acknowledged to me that he had exe\;uted the foregoing instrument as the act of th,~ said NINA
A. STEVENS.
Notary Public
~-.,-:_~,
.
.
Richard G. Ward, Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Jl;r"~l_ .,
. ,
.;/ j('()' 'i~
J> ,. h,
i...:
'-.:) - ~ --' '-::-
;>~. ~'...
"1 /"
I
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Soulhold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
December 13. 1994
Deborah Doty, Esq.
P.O. Box 1181
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Minor subdivision for
Stevens Bluff
SCTM# 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Doty:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board
at a meeting heid on Monday, December 12, 1994:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six (6)
month extension of sketch approval from December 14,1994 to June 14,
1995. Conditional sketch approval was granted on June 14,1993.
This additional extension was necessary due to the unexpected need for a
lot line change. This is the last extension that the Planning Board will be
granting.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
'JiJw~ 4 1d~m5
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
DEBUF'HH
r!I-:~
, -'-
/15 ~
~p
.
DEBORAH DOTY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
670 W~H CJU;~I\. AVl>NU~
P.O. Box 1181
CU'J'CHUGUIi. NY 11935-0876
FAX 51"'J...,1O.2
516-734-6648
.
FAX LETTER
DATE:
November 28, 1994
TO:
Planning Board, Town of Soulhold
FAX I:
516-765-3136
FROM:
Deborah Doty
RE:
StevenR JlJuff
Minor Subdivision of 4.4603 acres on Private Road, Cutchogue, NY
SeTM # 1000.83.02.08
li-
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS PAGE -1-. If you do nol receive all of It.e p.~e.. pIe...
call this office as soon as possible.
MESSAGE:
Dear Members of the BO:ird:
Pursuant to my telephone conversation with Melissa Spiro, Ihis is to request an
extension of the time in which to submit final maps ill connection with the abovc:-I'efel'enced
subdivision. Thank you.
-
,.. ~~ ~~
cc:
Edmund Stevens, JI'.
rn
----""'1
rn (C5 ~ 0 'IV It,,,,
NOV 2 9 1994 !
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PlANN!NG RO,~Rg...,~~....,~,,"
,---...-.-
IMJIOJ!:'b,N"I'I TIIIk 1""'Ofl"'A'ttOlol CONTAINkf) IN 1MIS '''A(1)I~ltJ.k TR4N6rou'IUON IS a)tfHC 'EH't IV.. I...."" omca AND M.\'V C(lNT41N n-70RMATION
lIfrftCU 16J11tIVIUGC:O AND/OR CONn.,,,,,n'At.. 1111': tNt<OIcM.-.lI0ro. "J:"illtNPltD ON..V ro. Tim VA or TIn: INNVlDtJA.L oa. C'Oto"PA.WV N4MJ:,. AflO\'R,
I' \'00 A.~ NOT TIm. D\~ID atclMINT OR AN IMl'LOlI'U OR A.GF..HT aU'PO:'ftIU.a: P'OIt DIUnarNQ nu. r"Cllfttl1..E TO TllE.~ RECIPIENT,
rUdE 81 ADYIUD nlA.T ANY l'HA.UTlIOIUUDDI5UM.L"'IUIO!ll'. DISb.IDunON. DIICl.QM.U OACOI"'rlftO UE nUl C:OMMUHIC"TIO"" 1'Jl00llalTEP AN>>
M" r 81: I'tINlIII.U1.IlJHDIIa "PrLI("o\I:LE LAW,.
:k"~~" I''''"':""".."".
.
.
Richard G. Ward, Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
-;>'".j D",,"':-"", C';),':"
,,. ,( \.', -'
~~ ~,,:, " ':J ~,,',~
-', ,,' ',', ;"y
.,~? ',' '. .,~,,<' .,;:-
'~, '.....1.V ...~':--
,"), ..>'"
. ;l
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
June 14, 1994
Deborah Doty
P.O. Box 1181
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Stevens Bluff
SCTM# 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Doty:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at
a meeting held on Monday, June 13, 1994:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month
extension of sketch approval from June 14, 1994 to December 14, 1994.
Conditional sketch approval was granted on June 14, 1993.
Please note that this is the last extension that the Planning Board will be
granting.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
1?~j ~
Richard G. Ward tfltJ
Chairman
h
.
.
DEBORAH DOTY
An-CRNEY AT LAW
WEST CREEK A VENUE
P.O. Box lI81
CUTCHOGUE. NY 11935
FAX 516-734.7702
516-734-6648
Sue:F
M5
BY HAND
May 25, 1994
Planning Department
Town of Southold
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
cJfpC
...l (o.iJJeJ'V
i (' l-'-
RE: Stevens - Hannabury Lot Line Change & Stevens Bluff
(a Minor Subdivision of 4.4603 acres on Private Road, Cutchogue, NY)
SCTM # 1000-83-02-08
Dear Members of the Board;
With respect to the lot line change, attached please find the following: (a) the application
signed by the owners, (b) a notarized letter from the owners approving the change and providing
the reasons for the change, (c) owners' affidavits stating that the property will be merged, (d)
letter regarding drainage, roads and grading, (e) the Short Environmental Assessment Form, (I)
the questionnaire, (g) eight copies of the survey, and (h) check # 593 drawn on my IOLA
account in the amount of $100.00 representing the fee for the within application.
This letter also is to request an extension of the time in which to submit final maps in
connection with the above-referenced subdivision.
Respectfully submitted,
~
~~~
Deborah Doty
DD:bdr
cc: Edmund Stevens, Jr. (via FAX)
~::-:
m & @ ~ a \q ~~: n ~ :
I . v:'" .
- j .'. '- ,
SOUHi')lO 1-::-'~~-'"
PlANNnm r~':',:;::o
------.---..-
--------
.
.
_ . ,/;,,-
Ul4 .. 1 .
Rlchard G. Ward. Chalnnan
George Ritchte Latham. Jr.
Bennett Orlowsld, Jr.
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
1/ j( :tJ"<~
" (..~ ,. ~
,~ 2l ,!r1
. .", -. " ~
0;./ '\ ./ "
/',' ,~.,,)...
"/},J ,-.".)
-j
SCOTfL.HARRlS
Supervisor
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
p. O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765.1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD
Fax (516) 765.1823
February 1, 1994
Deborah Doty
P.O. Box 1181
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision
Stevens Bluff, Cutchogue
SCTM# 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Doty:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town
Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 31, 1994:.
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a
six month extension of sketch approval from December 14, 1993 to
June 14, 1994. Conditional sketch approval was granted on June
14, 1993.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding
the above.
Sincerely,
~oAJ jj 1/~
Richard G. Ward ~5
Chairman
.
.
s., bj ,
('(\5
DEBORAH DOTY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
WEST CREEK AVENUE
P.O. Box 1181
CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935
FAX '516-734.7702
516-734-6648
January 19, 1994
Planning Department
Town of Southold
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
RE: Stevens Bluff
Minor Subdivision of 4.4603 acres on Private Road, Cutchogue, NY
SCTM # 1000-83-02-08
Dear Members of the Board:
Pursuant to my telephone conversation with Melissa Spiro, this letter is to request an
extension of the time in which to submit final maps in connection with the above-referenced
subdivision.
Respectfully submitted,
<"
c~ 0. ~
Deborah Doty
DD:bdr
JAN20~v
.
..
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
SCOTfL.HARRlS
Su peMsor
Richard G. Ward. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Bennett Orlowsld, Jr.
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOtmIOW
Fax (516) 765 - 1823
September 14, 1993
Deborah Doty
P.O. Box 1181
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision
Stevens Bluff, Cutchogue
SCTMi 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Doty:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town
Planning Board at a meeting held on September 13, 1993:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting
under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead
agency status, and as lead agency, grant a Conditioned Negative
Declaration.
The SUbject property contains steep slopes immediately south of
the top of bluff. In order to protect the natural resources of
the site, a seventy-five (75') foot buffer area shall be
established landward from the area designated as the top of
bluff. There shall be no alteration of the soils within this
area. Clearing shall be limited to pruning and establishing
stabilized foot trails. In lieu of the above mentioned general
conditions, a specific landscape plan for the buffer area may be
submitted to the Planning Board for review and approval.
The Draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must include
the wording described in Condition Number 1 of the Conditioned
Negative Declaration.
Enclosed please find a copy of the Conditioned Negative
Declaration for your records.
Sincerely,
R1J~&l fLd V~(
Chairman Y
.
.
RIchard C. Ward. Chatnnan
George RJtchte Latham. Jr.
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth 1... Edwards
SCaITL.HARRlS
SupeIVisor
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P. o. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765.1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Fax (516) 765. 1823
State Environmental Quality Review
CONDITIONED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice of Determination Non-Significant
September 13, 1993
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing
regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality
Review Act) of the Environmental Law.
The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined
that the proposed action described below will not have a
significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Name of Action:
Stevens Bluff
SCTM#:
1000-83-2-8
Location:
1762.19 feet north of Oregon Rd., Cutchogue
SEQR Status:
Type I
Unlisted
(
( X
Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes
No
( X )
( )
Description of Action:
Minor subdivision of 4.4603 acre parcel into two lots.
. .
Page 2
SEQRA Negative Declaration - Stevens Bluff
September 13, 1993
conditions:
1. The following covenant shall be imposed in order to protect
the natural resources of the site:
A. A seventy-five (75') foot buffer area shall be
established landward from the area designated as the
top of bluff. There shall be no alteration of the
soils within this area. Clearing shall be limited to
pruning and establishing stabilized foot trails.
B. In lieu of the above mentioned general condition, a
specific landscape plan for the buffer area may be
submitted to the Planning Board for review and
approval.
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
1. The Subject property contains steep slopes immediately
south of the top of bluff. In order to protect the natural
resources of the site a 75 foot buffer area has been
established.
2. The parcel is in the Residential R-80 District, allowing
single family residential development on lots of 80,000
square feet or more. The proposed project calls for
subdivision of the 4.46 acres into two lots of nearly equal
size. Both lots have in excess of 80,000 square feet.
3. The Full Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted,
and reviewed and it was determined that no significant
adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur
should the project be implemented as planned and in
accordance with the above mentioned conditions.
4. Correspondence has been received from the Suffolk County
Department of Health Services (SCDHS). The SCDHS has no
objection to the Planning Board's designation as lead
agency. The applicant must comply with the requirements of
the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and relevant construction
standards for water supply and sewage disposal.
. .
Page 3
SEQRA Negative Declaration - Stevens Bluff
September 13, 1993
5. The Planning Board has not received correspondence from the
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in
the allotted time, therefore, it is assumed that there are
no comments or objections from that agency.
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Melissa Spiro
Address: Planning Board
Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938
cc: Thomas Jorling, DEC Albany
Roger Evans, DEC SUNY
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Suffolk County Dept. Health Services
Suffolk County Planning Commission
Board of Trustees
Applicant
.
.
RJchard G. Ward. Chalnnan
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Bennett Orlowskt. Jr.
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
.
"
.';;'J
;,
:-"J
...,~
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
.-..':1
C!: ;'
SC01TL.HARRJS
Supetv1sor
Town Hall. 53095 Main Haad
p. O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTH OLD
Fax (516)765 - 1823
August 31, 1993
Deborah Doty
P.O. Box 1181
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Firewell location for
Steven's Bluff
SCTM# 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Doty:
Enclosed please find a copy of the map indicating the firewell
location as requested by the Cutchogue Fire Department.
Please include this on your final maps.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
this office.
S1iD 1/ 1IJ
Richard G. Ward ifill
Chairman
encs.
.4";
r_~,.~~
)' -~,"""-0/\
"/""~Ji\:)
',,(....."-.~. i)'
\ r ,','. -;"{/./:I t
:' "'-:::-:=:::::::--""N
,/' " '
~-~
. .
CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT
~rlce
I"tS
;?b
New Suffolk Road. PO Box 930. Cutcho~ue. NY 11935
Telephone (516) 734-6907'. Fax (516) 734-7079
August 20, 1993
Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman
Southold Town Planning Bd.
Town Hall
Southold, N.Y. 119~1
Ref; Nina Stevens
Dear Mr. Ward,
Reference the above properties, it is the opinion of this board that a
new fire well be placed as marked by an X on the enclosed drawings.
The Fire Well is to conform to our specifications and be equipped as
follows;
1, 20 H.P., 3 Phase, Submersible pump capable to deliver 400 GPM
at 10 PSI discharge at center of tee at top of well. Pump shall
be of submersible turbine type, equipped with grease packed
bearings in bowl assemblies. The bowls shall be of a smooth
finish design to guide the water from one stage to the next
with a minimum of turbulence.
2. Top of the well is to be finished off with an 8" x 4 II well seal.
411 galvanized tee and plug, and 4" x 4-1/2" solid brass ferrule
and cap. The hose threads and hydrant wrench nut shall conform
to the standards of the Cutchogue Fire District.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Very truly yours, .
/J,~. '()~'.Y.
/v U-ul~t~:;"'l ;';fi;:~,-
;/
Mathew J. Martin
Secretary
rnjrn/encl. cc: Chief
}\----"'T:II.Q.,JL :-:1'11
1]'
, ~
"'''''i
.; .~
'- .,
'..:
"
....- l
Lf,:~TF;p.L;~'3~ I
....
~
....,
"'9.
U'~
~h
~
U'
~~~~
~ i-.,~'"
'. '?<Sl
- -- - ~
::;t.-"""",
~ ./. ,,"
.
.47' --
::-:.-:.-:;5-:'-
~ _ _4 _ _
.>-
~-
1::,' .
0'
~ '
" -';'0/
/~--:......
~', .~,/
c _ - l,D7
"
,
/
/
- - _ _ 70 /
"'" - .--- .
"- '~
,,-=:>..:...
1.0 " ~
.. '(G .?
"-, ~......
. '" 'V? "
", ...../70'-
--'- '-" '-. //
- ----,"
<'0
/'-
,
"
<"0-
/'--
.,;:>
~,
0",'--
.~
. $7.
- ----- -
~
<,
')
""
.
"
/
I
/
,
~ "
0",'.
"':;"::0 .~... ~/
~~ ,--
I
_ 16' R.O.W.
1 -"' ,,-----
~ -~._--- ,"
. -' ......--"" ----
RIGHT:::OF 'iO'- W,
----- . ~/ -'
'. ~___ _ >v----- -
zY.
Proposed 50'
6" ";",d- 206,21'
'~. Righi of Way :'
~~. 206,21' "
".~./4/3.22'
.;/" 5 82'28'00' i W.
,,- _-' .. // . 60.04.
'" ,///
./
5, 82'28'00' W.
...
,
~
"
.~ -v
",'
'"<5'
~
0"
o.
~
)R
J
......0
~
~~
-S-.....o
"S-:~
....,~
~
~
~~
:J-
'.
~
. $7<5>~ '"
;,. ""s-
)7. .
o
o.
~
0.-.
^'
-..;
~
~i>;~
~~
~
~
-_.~..
. .
CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT
~/u:r
1'1-5
,Rb
New Suffolk Road. PO Box 930. Cutchogue. NY 11935
Telephone (516) 734-6907' Fax (516) 734-7079
August 20, 1993
Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman
Southold Town Planning Bd.
Town Hall
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Ref; Nina Stevens
Dear Mr. Ward,
Reference the above properties, it is the opinion of this board that a
new fire well be placed as marked by an X on the enclosed drawings.
The Fire Well is to conform to our specifications and be equipped as
follows;
1, 20 H.P., 3 Phase, Submersible pump capable to deliver 400 GPM
at 10 PSI discharge at center of tee at top of well. Pump shall
be of submersible turbine type, equipped with grease packed
bearings in bowl assemblies. The bowls shall be of a smooth
finish design to guide the water from one stage to the next
with a minimum of turbulence.
2. Top of the well is to be finished off with an 8" x 4" well seal.
4" galvanized tee and plug, and 4" x 4-1/2" solid brass ferrule
and cap. The hose threads and hydrant wrench nut shall conform
to the standards of the Cutchogue Fire District.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Very truly yours,
;2~M;vL
Mathew J. Martin
Secretary
mjmjencl. cc: Chief
_o"o___'"'.___._____~_._,
""" '? ii' i~ 0 \{1 ~ \';\1
f i D.J r.1So"'-"~'":L.l~.""~-1 i ~ I!
q :' .. ~
!UU: AUG 2 3 1993
I I 0
L--..", ..~ ,H,:' _, ~~ .,J ;
"'"" 1 !,,' ,~U I -. j !
I .E.~..;:.t~~:.'l..~l:_,,_~_....~_
.
.
I
I
>c --
~
"9
.' ..,
- /'1:"... . U\
,,()~ ~
/' '~', ,.~
/. ~~. ~
~ ~~
"'. "'<$><:;. -.: ~
-~ . ~ '''-..
'"
0---
/7
/
/
6'o~ ' /
~..::>, .~_ I
-.:; -o{"
"'.
/
/
/
II. / .....-,
'R.O. .---Ir--'f-_-->>- W r
16 - 0'-
-- . - -- .. -----OF 'i / /
J. r--- .t
RIG~ _ 'V/
----~
, .
"-. .',
/
- - /
-.-:=;.:::='-- -';'0 ,,~
---- -. c-
o -.-- _"', _ \.D7
e. /' ~ /
. - - - - ~ _ 70
"'. "~~~ ~? <'0 /'
" '. ~-", ~
'" .', "~
1," ~, b~
~, "...... 'I) ,
/'0. , /
~o-- ".... .--"'-
:.>-~-----:-::-~- ~o~
~ ."" . ;.;'<99_
"
')
~~',
----;; War .
- RighI 206.21 22' j
, '. / . 4/3. '00" W.
d 50 ~"', / 82"28 4'
PropO~~.2J' ./ /,." S. 60.0
2 0" w.
tj~d- 2-28'0
5.8
" wOODED;"'" ....0
" .- '-{,.o
~~
"9~
"9~~
~~
'.
/
-'V~'
. ..
90:>0 .~~
9,,_
q:;;..
-1;:..0
~
.v~'~
~.
;p~/
0/
%
""
,
"
,- ...-
'...... '"
<5'~
0",
O.
~
JR
J
.1
.
, /~ ~;:::U::<:::;;;;:o.> ~"-
.r".";:"FFO' ;,.~ .
.v ~ "U ~'1 '" 'G
Ij<~\': II" "(2 \\
~?~ '.J' .' ~ ~
hg ,T' . ~J\\
-1.."". "'.". t..'.... "'"
'\ " . -
''t:> I.:;: ~
'.,'- " ",~(.;:' - ","",
C, .'-'. ',,,,, . ""-:I
''G. O>;.:t'~.-. ,.v'"".
".'. 'tJ1 ,''1.r .....V;"i> ,0
-;:c~ "."-r I...~}J
'O>~~JI
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Benneu Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDooald
Kenneth L Edwards
scon L HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765.1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Towo Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765.1823
August 10, 1993
Deborah Doty
P.O. Box 1181
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision
Stevens Bluff, Cutchogue
SCTM# 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Doty:
The fOllowing resolution was adopted by the Southold Town
Planning Board at a meeting held on August 9, 1993:
BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the July 7, 1993 Suffolk County Planning
Commission report with the fOllowing amendments:
1. Number 4 of the report is to be excluded.
Please note the fOllowing:
A. The second paragraph of condition number 5 is to be
included in the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions.
B. A copy of the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions
must be submitted for review by the Planning Board and the
Town Attorney. Once approved, the document must be filed in
the Office of the County Clerk.
C. The Planning Board did not adopt the comments offered by the
Commission.
As discussed at the meeting, the Planning Board will be
conducting a field inspection of the site prior to making a
State Environmental Quality Review (SEQRJ determination.
Please notify this office when a path has been cleared for the
inspection.
.
.
.
Stevens Bluff
August 10, 1993
Page 2
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding
the above.
S~cZ) / V
Richard G. war~ ~
Chairman
enc.
cc: Suffolk County Planning Commission
Frank Cichanowicz
--
. .
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
SUeRc.e
;>8
I'-r5
"'..:~-:~~:~;-~~~~
_.r. Vii'. H
. '-'~', , <-"
~~
ROBERT .J. GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
ARTHUR H. KUNZ
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
July 7, 1993
Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman
Town of Southold Planning Board
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision - Stevens Bluff (Nina A. Stevens)
1762.19 feet n/o Oregon Road, adjoining Long Island Sound,
Town of Southold, New York.
Dear Mr. Ward:
The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on
July 7, 1993, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Proposed Minor
Subdivision - Stevens Bluff (Nina A. Stevens)" referred to it pursuant to
Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code.
The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative
to this application.
~.ry':;J"
~~owlin~(:)sr .
~~~~sion ~iew
Planner
Division
File: S-SD-93-06
. FD:mb
Attachment
cc: J. Baier, C.E., SCDHS
. ., "-~:-'"'-":"~-::7""'~<:"'~,,"
'. .'. " ,''I I" 1'1
.: Ii.) i,~_ U '.J lG. j (, ! i
;i ru:'(-~...-----: ,".
lU' . .
I L_"______~
<'-.\]j.fl.',.:.... ',i':',.;
1 .:~L'<";" ,,-,I_D I'," ,.~
; ;-'L~:'J,",!lt~G CD~KD
H. LEE DENNISON BUILDING
.
VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
.
HAUPPAUGE. NEW YORK I' 786
.
(5161 853-5192
-I
.
.
File No. S-SD-93-06
Resolution No. ZSR-93-80 of Suffolk County Planning Commission
Pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County
Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County
Planning Commission on June 17, 1993, with respect to a proposed plat
entitled, "Proposed Minor Subdivision - Stevens Bluff (Nina A.
Stevens)" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting
premises located 1762.19 feet n/o Oregon Road, adjoining Long Island
Sound, in the Town of Southold, New York, and
WHEREAS, said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning
Commission at its meeting on July 7, 1993, and
WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to approve with certain changes said
referral, Be It Therefore
RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and
adopts the report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Be It
Further
RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is approved subject to the meeting of the
following conditions that are deemed necessary to help preserve the
natural and aesthetic attributes of the shoreline of Long Island
Sound.
1. No sanitary disposal facility shall be installed or constructed
or within 100 feet of the top of the bluff.
2. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and
improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be
discharged down the face of the bluff.
3. Erosion and sediment control measures shall be required during
and immediately after construction on each lot to insure that
stormwater runoff will not carry eroded and other deleterious
materials into Long Island Sound.
4. Access to the beach shall be only by means of a suitable
structure located at or near the common lot line. The structure
shall be designed and constructed in a manner that will result in
the least disturbance of the stability of the bluff.
5. Conditions 1-4, inclusive, shall be filed as covenants and
restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the
granting of approval to this subdivision.
..
..
Resulution No. ZSR-93-80
S-SD-93-06
---..----------------------------------------------------------------------------
These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the
request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a
majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold
after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be
entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to
such modification shall not be required.
6. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of
Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County
Clerk's office which affects lots in this subdivision.
The Commission also offers the following comments on the map:
1. A common driveway should be provided to serve as access to the
lots as Soundview Avenue may become a heavily travelled road in
the future.
2. A buffer or conservation easement at least 50 feet in width
should be created along Soundview Avenue to help preserve the
natural vegetation along the road, so as to enhance the
aesthetics of the road, contribute to the preservation of
residential amenities from traffic activities and noise and to
help minimize the erosion potential.
Motion by: Commissioner Stahlman
Seconded by: Commissioner Cichanowicz
Commlssion Vote:
12 Present
Yeas
Nays
Abstentions
12
o
o
Datec July 7, 1993
Hauppauge, New York
Suffolk County Planning Commission
TRUSTEES
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President
Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President
Henry P Smith
John B. Tuthill
William G. Albertson
Telephone (516) 765-1892
Fax (516) 765-]823
.
.
Sulo<i
me.
, ../
SUPERVISOR
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
PO. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Richard Ward, Chairman
Planning Board
John M. Bredemeyer, III, pres.~
Board of Trustees ~.
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Nina Stevens SCTM *1000-83-2-8
DATE:
August 5, 1993
A review of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area jurisdictional map
indicates that structures placed within the building envelope as
proposed on the March 24, 1993 survey will be non-jurisdiction
with respect to the Coastal Erosion Ordinance.
As activities within 25' feet of the point of inflection of the
bluff would require a Coastal Erosion Management Permit for
clearing and re-vegetation, you may wish to make specific
reference to this in your approvals.
I 0, rn @ ~ 0 WI ~ m I
L_ _. __--1!
2-\,1-, I f
C ~ ~ },..__, j
", .' - .
C;-~
CRAMER, VI SOCIATES
ENVIRONMENT ,;~~ ...:.... G CONSULTANTS
.'
.
SVbJ'
,!,JS
PB
4
.
Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman
Southold Planning Bonrd
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Review of EAF for
Nina Stevens (aka Stevens Bluff)
SCTM No. 1000-083-2-8
August 4, 1993
; AUG 5 1993
L_."'...."'......_..J
sOU;:-;i.JLD rm',,'J1
PU\NN1NG LlOAi~i)
Dear Mr. W~.rd:
As pe:r the your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above
referenced project in accordance with your request. Tasks and completed activities are
identified as follows:
1.
Review Part I LEAF
The parcel has bcen field inspected by CV A, and the LEAF has been reviewed and
amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached.
Prepute Part II LEAF
The Fart II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional
inforr~ation concerning our findings is included below.
Environmental and Planning Consideratiolls
The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and
area llave been consulted. The site is vacant and predominantly wooded in mature
deciduous forest. The site borders Long Island Sound, and the northern one-quarter
of the site is comprised of a bluff. The bluff is within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area,
and therefore, over time may be subject to erosion and/or destabilization. The
south~rn three-quarters of the site is comprised of mostly level ground; however,
locali:zed slopes of 25 to 35 percent exist in the areaimmediatefy south of the "top of
bluff' as identified on the subdivision map. In addition, this steep slope area is
pitch<:d toward the top of the bluff, thereby causing concern for runoff and erosion
should significant destabilization occur in this area.
The site is located in Groundwater Management Zone IV, and is not within the
North Fork Water Bud~et Area. There is adequate depth to groundwater for sanitary
recharge, and the area IS not identified in the North Fork Water Supply study as
being impacted by nitrate or aldicarb contamination. The site is bordered by a single
famil'! dwelling to the east, farmland to the south, vacant land to the west, and Long
Islanel South to the east. The parcel is zoned R-80 District, allowing sinsle family
residEootial development on lots of 80,000 square feet or more. The site IS accessed by
several right-oC'ways, that have been depicted on the map.
The proposed project calls for subdivision of the 4.46 acres into two lots of nearly
equal size. Both lots have ill excess of 80,000 square feet. Access shall be provided in
2.
3.
Page 1 of2
54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD. SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455
-~,.
~.
.
.
Stevens BlulT Subdivision
Long EAr Review
accordance with the requirements of the Planning Board as documented in a letter
dated June 15, 1993, or as amended by the Board. Access is not eX'pected to cause a
significant impact upon the environment provided no right-of-way Improvement
occurs within 100 feet of the above noted bluff. The project meets or exceeds the
density requirements of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for lot
size. Review and approval of the Health Department will be required for sanitary
installation and well water.
The ste:ep slopes immediately south of the "top of bluff' and the locally important
vegetation warrant consideration. The steep slope areas lie wholly outside of the
proposed building envelops as depicted on tbe minor subdivision map. A minimum
100 foot setback from the "top of bluff' is provided for the building envelop. Due to
the vegetative features of the site, the adjacent bluff, the extreme topographic relief,
and th(l fact that this steep slope area pitches north toward the bluff, it is
recommended that a stringent covenant be imposed in order to protect the sites
natural resources. Suggested language is as follows:
{~
~4,:{ ":. -
;~'~"."...,...'1>..'
~~,.. ,
"There shall be no disturbance or alteration of the soils or vegetation (with the exception of
minor stabili~ed foot trails) within a 100 foot setback area to be established south of the "top of
bluff' as identified on the minor subdivision for Nina A. Stevens prepared by Peconic Surveyors,
P.C. dated March 24,1993, last revised on April 13.1993."
This condition could be incorporated into a Conditioned Negative Declaration as the
project is an Unlisted Action. The condition should be described and illustrated on
the filed map, and should run with the land for owners of each individual site. It
would also be prudent to review in detail each building permit application to ensure
that the clearing limit is depicted, and to hold issuance of a CertIficate of Occupancy
for each dwelling until a final inspection is conducted.
Other aspects of the proposed project are not expected to result in a significant
impact on the environment based on Parts I andU of the EAF and independent
review documented herein. .
~~~?t;~i~~i1::---.'
';'.
.,.O:il.
."'
~"
,~c ..
;<.-,t' ,~_
*
*
*
*
, . As noted, most concerns involve concern over the steep slope areas on the northern
part of the site; however, these can be mitigated thrO\lgh imposition and enforcement of
stringent COVEmants to restrict clearing and soil disturbance In this area.
I believe that with the inclusion of these measures, the Planning Board would be
proper in issuing a Negative Declaration (or Conditioned Negative Declaration), based on
the Long EAF Parts I and H. the content of this review, and the deliberation of the Planning
Board. If you. have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter, please
do not hesitate to call.
~.~~
CRAMER, V R SOCIATES
ENVIRONMENT AN G CONSULTANTS
Page 2 00
, .-""'........ .....
,,' . '
""'" or . T T
"'':>...
C~ _.....
_ .... II .....4><:
~16-2 (2/87)-7c
e.
..
SEQR
(
617.21
Appendix A
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. in an orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to anSWer. Frequent-
ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature. yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact ;s likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
{
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: XI Part 1 0 Part 2 OPart 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and .3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact. it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
o A. The project will not resuit in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore. is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
o B. Although the project could have a significant effect On the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART .3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.'
o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Stevens Bluff (SCTM # 1000-8J-02-08)
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Name of Action
~U'N-()U>. ~ / tJ~ ?t+tv.v"'''(J ~M-6
Name of Lead Agency
(lrIm/?NnV
Titl f Responsible Officer
CPNi"U2..:MNr 70
~
e of Preparer (If different from responsible officer)
'-
$-L/-9?.
Date.
'ART 1-PROJECT INFORMA*.
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
On the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona!{
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. .
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on. information currently available and will not involve
new studies. research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable. so indicate and specify
each instance.
~'
NAME OF ACTION 1000-8J-02-08)
Stevens Bluff (SCTM #
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County)
Private Road, Cutchogue, Southold, Suffolk
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR I B~s5i~ TEL7J>Jf~5648
Deborah Doty, Atty
ADDRESS
670 West Creek Avenue, P.O. Box 1181
CITY/PO j STATE I f19~5
Cutchogue, NY
NAME OF OWNER (It dilferenl) /' BUS~ESS TELEPHO"~
Nina A. Stevens ( 11) 259-0 20
ADDRESS
c/~ Edmund Stevens, Jr. Sandy Pond Road
CITY/PO T STATE T ZIP COD~
Lincoln MA 017 3
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION {Lor ;)
Minor sUbdivision of 4.4603 acres into two lots. of '17 07~
I
...,
/- 'I7,IZ,
s q. Pr.
(?;r ~)
~.
~
f-
Please C9,;,plete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A.Site Description
Physical 'setting of overall project. both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: DUrban Olndustrial OCommercial OResidential (suburban)
" OForest OAgriculture OOther .
4.4603
19Rura,1 (non-farm)
2. Total apeage of project area: acres. '
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE } I ~ PRESENTlY i ^,T\"s~gMPLE710N
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) '3. S- 4. j ,,0 J- acresZ, . . . acres
Forested ~ acres acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland. pasture. etc.) '" acres acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL) acres acres
Water Surface Area acres acres
Un vegetated (Rock. earth or fill) O. q fn acres 0 ,q~ acres
Roads. bUildings and other paved surfaces acres IJ. OR acres
Other (Indicate type) IJHJDSClH'b'"'1l acres ~ acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? J>/l? PrlA ;)u ,PIA (/iy, :Nlo~S:~,,'\
'1 / ~
a. Soil drainage: mWell drained 100. % of ;ite OModerately well drained % of site
OPoorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are c1ilssified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYSt-
Land Classification System? N. H.. acres, (See 1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? DYes ~No
a. Whilt is depth to bedrock? -700 ff. (in.feet)
2
!.Approx,mate percentage of Proed prOject site with slopes C10-10% ~ %
. . 12915% or gr. ~ 10
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed On the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? DYes iliiNo
( 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural landmarks?
8. What is the depth of the water table? n/a (in feet) 68 Pr.
9. Is site located over a primary, ;>rincipal. or sole source aquifer? ~Yes DNo
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area?
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as
~
DYes iliiNo According to 7'-,,,,,, I'> 7.N~j:J"::-rn,,^. ("'1/.4-
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes,
;JZf<'es I1QNo Describe &CA-!ZrV"r-tl.rr /ti)~rr I"N'7
010-15%
%
%
DYes
~No
DYes
iliiNo
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
DYes ~No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
DYes ~No
threa~endangered?
other geological formations)
LlLA-N^ \.'/,.vLl
15.
Streams within or contiguous to project area: None
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16.
17.
(
lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name None t.oN~ n/A-Nr> "SOuND b. Size (In acres)
is the site served by existing public utilities? ~es ~No ~c.>f2.. M)
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~es DNo ~
b) Jf Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? )4Yes DNo
Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets law, Article 25-AA,'
Section 303 and 304? DYes UlNo
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the Eel, and 6 NYCRR 617? DYes :lONo
18.
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes?
DYes
~No
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project Sponsor 4-.4-60" acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: 4-.4-60" acres initially; n/ a
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped -0 - acres.
d. length of project, in miles: N. A. . (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N. A. %;
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing . N. A. ; proposed N. A . 0
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour N. A. (upon completion of project)? Z
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family
Initially 0
Ultimately 2
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 36' height; n/ a
j. linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will OCCUpy is?
acres ultimately.
~
Multiple Family
Condominium
width; .n/ a
o
length.
ft.
3
,
2. How cluch natural material (i..ck, earth, etc.) will be removed fro'::l.j.e,ite? none
3. Will disturbed areas be recl.dl ~es DNo 0N/A ... ..
a. If yes, for what intend_': purpose is the site being reclaimed? /.A-Nil<;r.-t-P1N"j !I+oAtr-v<ITT-'<:.
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNo ~
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes DNo ~
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? n/ a /. 'I acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
DYes IDNo
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction N. A. I Z. months, (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1
c. Approximate completion date of final phase
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases?
8. Will blasting OCcur during construction? DYes BNo
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction n/ a Z ; after project is complete
10. Numb,,, of jobs eliminated by this project n/ a q
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
tons/cubic ya;;"
\
N4
(number).
month
month
DYes
year, (including demolition).
year.
DNa
o
DYes
I1!lNo
If yes, explain
12.
15.
16.
Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes .KJNo
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? )i:(Yes ~No Type ~~rh1J.{=-
Will'surfaCE Mea of an existing water bOdy increase or decre.aseby pmpma~- DYe.s... ~No
Explain
Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? es DNa
Will the project generate solid waste? }l!ft..es 6QNo ~
a. If yes, what is the amount per month O. C, tons <!,!f1/'
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~es DNa
c. If yes, give name S'OunJlJlb I'IS;..1 Rw-Il-{t'/ location M/H"nT"/It:~
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes .~o
e. If Yes, explain
.13.
14.
(
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste?
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal?
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life?
DYes 0No
tons/month.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides?
years.
DYes
XJNo
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes ~No
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes BNo
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use?
If yes, indicate type(s)
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 2n:t gallons/minute.
23, Total anticipated water usage per day ~(Y) gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, Slate or Federal funding? DYes lONo
If Yes, explain
~es
GaNo
e
4
c. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? KJVes DNo
If Ves, indicate decision required:
Ozoning amendment ~oning variance Ospecial use permit lXIsubdivision
Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother
2. What is the zoning c1assification(s)of the site? R 80
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
two 2+ acre lots
/" 2~. Approvals Required:
e.
(
City, Town, Village Board
City, Town, Village Planning Board
. City, Town Zoning Board
-', ---_. - --. -.
City, County Health Department
Other local Agencies
Other Regional Agencies
State Agencies
Federal Agencies
DVes J[JNo
OlIVes DNo
/&lVes DNo
liaVes DNo
19Ves DNo
DVes QQNo
DVes IXINo
DVes 19No
'.
Submittal
Date
Minor subdivision
Area variance
WAll water approval
Trustees' review of
eros~on area
coastal
Dsite plan
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? No change requested
s. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
two lots
6. Is-t~ Pmp'osed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans?
7. What are the pr;dominan{landase(s~aA~ Wriihg cfassifications within a Yo mile radius of proposed action?
agricultural & residential
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V. mile? -!9Ves DNo
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? two
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 97,076 square feet
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DVes egNo
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? 6i!Ves DNo
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? l'9Ves DNo
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? DYes l'9No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DVes DNo
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoidthem.~ ~~. ~~~~~ ay:
E. Verification . ~~/ (!&:-PI /frcp 84i..i13
I certify that the information provid above is true to the best of my knOWledge.
Applicant/S onsor Name Deborah Dot . Att Date 5/5/93
Signature
I1!lVes
DNo
Title
Attorney
If the action is in Ihe Coastal Area, and you are a slale a~ency, complete the Coastal Assess;"en! Form before proceeding
with Ihis assessment.
5
c. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? roYes DNo
If Yes, indicate decision required:
Dzoning amendment ~oning variance Ospecial use permit lXIsubdivision
Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother
What is the zoning c1assification(s)of the site? R 80
What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
two 2+ acre lots
/" ~_r::.. Approvals Required:
..
f
City, Town, Village Board
City, Town, Village Planning Board
. City, Town Zoning Board
City, County Health Department
Other Local Agencies
Other Regional Agencies
State Agencies
Federal Agencies
DYes .lONo
IllIYes DNo
IKIYes DNo
IXIYes DNo
~Yes DNo
DYes I1!lNo
DYes IllINo
DYes ~No
2.
3.
4.
5.
,- 6.
'- 7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
'.
Submittal
Date
Minor subdivision
Area variance
WAll water approval
Trustees' review of
erosJ.on area
coastal
Dsite plan
What is the proposed zoning of the site? No change requested
What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
two lots
Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? I1>lYes DNo
What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a Yo mile radius of proposed action?
a~ricultural & residential
Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a Yo mile? mYes DNo
If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? two
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 97,076 square feet
Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes e9No
Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? 5i!Yes DNo
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? 1'9 Yes DNo
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic Significantly above present levels? DYes I'9No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes DNo
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them. ~~. ;;~~ ~<SZns!:> py:
E. Verification ~~~ CG'P, /f.rcP 8--9-'13
I certify that the information provide above is true to the best of my knOWledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name Deborah ~~ty Date 5/5/93
Signature ',~. Ov""G. .i:)_ Title Attorney
If the aclion i, in the Coa,tal Area, and you are a stale agency, complete the Coa'tal Assess;"ent Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
5
Plr1 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE
. lesponslblUty of Lull Alency .
General InforlMtlon (Read Carefully)
. In completina the form the reviewer should be auided by the question: H~ve my responses ~nd .l"!termin~tions bee
reAlonablel The reviewer is not expected to be ~n expert environmenul ~n~I~t.
. Identifyina that an Impact will be potentially IlIae (column 2) does not me~n that it is ~Iso necessarily sllnlflcaat.
Any larae impact must be ev~lu~ted in PART 3 to determine sianificance. Identifyina ~n impact in column 2 simpl
asks that it be looked at further.
. The Examples provided are to ~ssist the reviewer by'showina types of impacts ~nd wherever possible the threshold.
macnitude that would uiger a response in column 2. The examples are cener~lIy applicable throuahout the State ar.
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriat
for a Potential Larae Impact response, thus requirina evaluation in Part 3.
. The Imp~cts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative an
have been offered as auid~nce. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts ~nd thresholds to answer each questioo
. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of nch question. .
. In identifyine impacts, consider lone term, short term and cumlative effects.
r
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer yes if there will be any impact
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answerine Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of t~
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshol
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt ~bout size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially larae and proceed to PART
e. If a potentially laree impact checked in column 2 can be mitipted by chanee(s) in the project to a small to madera
i..'1lpact, also check the Yes box In column 3. A No response indicates tNt such ~ reduction Is not possible. Th
. must b. ClC.plained in Part 3.
IMPACT ON LAND
1. Will the proposed action result in a physical chance to the pro~.~
oNO .p\ES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Any construction on slopes of 15% or ereater, (15 foot rise per 100
foot of leneth), or where the eenera) slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than
3 feet.
. Construction of paved parkine area for 1,000 or more vehicles.
. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or eenerally within
3 feet of existine eround surf~ce.
.. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more
than one phase or staee.
. Excavation for minine purposes that would remove more than 1,000
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year.
. Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill.
. Construction in a desienated f100dway.
. Other impacts
2. Will there be an effect t... _.IY unIque or unusual land forms f~ on
the site? (i.e.. cliffs. dunes, eeoloeical formations, etc.)oNO JlQ'ES
. SpecifiC land forms:
6
-.-. -
'\ 2 3
Small 10 Potential Can Impact
Moderate Large MItigated B
'liiiPaCf Impact ProJect Chan
X 0 ~es ON
0 0 Dyes ON
[l 0 Dyes ON
0 0 DYes ON
0 0 DYes ON
0 0 DYes ON
0 0 DYes ON
0 0 DYes ON
0 0 DYes ON
X 0 ~es ON
eo
y
"
o
o
o
o
o
c
c
c
c
,-
IMPA~ WATER
3 Will proposed .ction .lfect .ny water body desianated as protected!
(Under Articles 1S. 2.. 2S of the Environmental Conse~n law, ECl)
~O DVES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Developable are. of site cont.ins a protected water body.
. Dredaina more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a
protected stream.
· Extension of utility distribution facilities throuah a protected water body.
· Construction in a Msianated freshwater or tidal wetland.
. Other impacts:
04. Will proposed action affect any no~protected existi~r new body
of water! ~O DVES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. ^ 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
· Other impacts:
S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or aroundwater ~
qu~lity or quantity!. ~O DVES
Eumples that would apply ~ column 2
. PropoSed Action will require. discharae permit.
. Proposed Action requires use ola sOUrce of water that does not
h.ve .pproval to, serve proposed. (project) action.
. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with aruter th.n 04S
lallons per minute pumpina tapacity.
. Construction or operation causina any contamination of a water
supply system.
. Proposed Action will adversely affect aroundwater.
. liquid effluent will be conveye<: off the site to facilities whi~h presently
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 aallons per
day.
. Proposed Action will likpl" cac.;p siltation or other discharae into an
existina body of water ,,, th", ~':Ientthatthere will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
. Proposed Action will require the storaae of petroleum or chemical
products areater than 1.100 aallons.
. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas 'without water
and/or sewer services.
. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storaae
facilities.
· Other impacts:
( ). Will proposed action alter drainaae flow or patt~. or
" water runoff! ~O
Eu:nples that would apply to column 2
. Propvs..d Action woold chanae flood wat..r flows.
surface
DVES
7
21' 3
Potential Can Impact e
Large MItigated By
Impact Project Chang
., .
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
DVes
DVes
ON,
ONi
Dves
DVes
DVes
ON,
ON,
ON,
DVes
ON,
DVes
DVes
ON,
ON,
DVes
DVes
ON,
ON,
DVes
ON,
Dves
ON,
Dves
DVes
ON,
O~,
DVes
ON,
DVes
UN.
DVes
ON,
Dves
ON,
DVes
ON.
DVes
ON.
DVes
ON
.
. Proposed Action may cause sub~tantial ero~ion.
. Proposed Action i~ incompatible with existinll drainalle patterns.
. Proposed Action will allow development in a desillnated fJoodway.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON "R
~O
DYES
7. Will proposed action affect air quality!
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action will induce 1.000 or more vehicle trip~ in any liven
hour.
. Proposed Action will re~ult in the incineration of more than 1 ton of
refuse per hour.
. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 fbs. per hour or a
heat source producinll more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
. Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed
to industrial use.
. Proposed action will allow an increa~e in the density of industrial
development within exi~tinll industrial area~.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8. Will Proposed Action affKt any thn!atened Of elld~ed
species! . ~O DYES
Examples that ,",auld apply to column 2 I
· Reduction of one or more spe<:ies listed on the New York or Federal
list. usinll the site. over or near site or found on the site.
. Removal of any portion of a critical or sillnificant wildlife habiUt.
. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other
than for allricultural purposes.
· Other impacts:
9. Will Propo~ed Action substantially aHect non-threa~ or
non-endanllered species? NO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resideflt <>r
millratory fish. shellfish or wildlife species.
. Proposed Action requires the removal of mOil: than 10 acres
of mature forest (over 100 years of ale) or other locally important
velletation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect allricultural land r~.~ rces?
~O DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. The proposed action would sever, cros~ or limit access to aKriculturar
land (includes croplalld. hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard. etc.)
8
-
Small 10 Pollnlll' c.n Impact Be
t.4*all LarOI Mllloat~ By
I cl Impacl Project Change
0 0 oYe~ ONe
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 Dyes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 Dyes DNo
0 0 Dyes DNo
0 0 Dyes DNo
~. -... ....
0 0 Dyes 'DNo
0 0 Dyes DNo
0 0 Dyes oNo
0 0 Dyes DNo
0 0 Dyes oNo
0 0 DYes oNo
.
0 0 Dyes oNo
.
· Construction utivity would excaville or compact the soil profile of
~Iricultural land.
· The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
of ~Iricultural land or, if located in an Alricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of alrlcultural land.
· The propOsed action would disrupt or prevent installation of alricultural
I~nd manalement systems (e.I., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip croppinal; or create a need for such meaures (e.l. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources! '~O DVES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in 'Sei'iion 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Eumples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from
or in sharp contrast to current surroundinlland use patterns, whether'
m~n-made or natural.
. Proposed land uses, or project components visible' to users of
~esthetlc resources which will eliminate or silnificantly reduce their
enjoyment of the lIesthetic qualities of th~t resource.
Project components that will result in the elimination or silnificant
screeninl of scenic views 'kllOwn to be important to the area",
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure Vistoric, pre-
historic or paleontoloaical importance! ~O DVES
b~mples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially
contiauous to any facility or site listed on the State or National R~ister
of historic places,
· Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the
project site.
· Proposed Action will occur in an area desianated as sensitive for
archaeoloaical sites on the NVS Site Inventory.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existina or
future open spaces or recreational opportullities!
- Eumples that would apply to column 2 ~O DVES
( IThe permanent foreclosure of a future recreational ~rtunlty.
'"'T" A major reduction of an open space important to the community.
· Other impacts:
-- ~
. - -
Small to Potentia' Can Impact Be
M.ate Larg. MItigated By
, ct Impact Project Change
0 0 OVes DNa
0 0 OVes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes ONo
0 0 DYes DNa
-
0 0 Dyes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
'n 0 ;.OY~s ONe
-'..
0 0 OVes DNa
0 0 OVes ONe>
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 DYes oNo
0 0 Dyes DNa
0 0 Dyes ONo
IMPACT ON.NS~RTAT'ON
14. Willth'!!r'!! be ~n '!!ff'!!ctto '!!xistin. transportation syst'!!msl
'l'ilGo DYES
hampln that would apply to column 2 /'
o Alt'!!ration of present patt'!!rns of movement of people ~nd/or .oods.
o Proposed Action will r'!!sult in major traffic probl'!!ms.
o Other impacts:
IMPACT ON ENERGY
sou~. of fu'!!l or
~O . DYES
15. Will proposed action affKt the community's
'!!ner.y supplyl
Eumpl'!!s that would apply to column 2
o Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of
any form of energy in the municipality.
o Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an '!!nergy
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
o Other impacts:
16. Will there be objectionable odon, noise, or vibra~as a r'!!sult
of the Proposed ActIonl ~O OVESc
Eumpln that would apply to column 2
. Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital. school or other s'!!nsitive
facility.
o Odors will occur routinely (morl!! than one hour per dayL
_.. --
o Pro~ Action will produce operatinl Roise exceedina the local
ambient noise levels for noill! outside of structunes.
o Proposed Action will rl!!move natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
o Other impacts:
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and sa~tyl 0
DYES
ham pIn that would apply to column 2
o Proposed Action may caUll! a risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances (i.e. oil, pesticides. chemicals, radiation. etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharae or emission.
o Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any
form (i.e. toxic. poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating.
infectious, etc.)
o Storale facilities for one million or more gallons of Iiquified natural
aas or other f1ammabl'!! liquids.
o Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance
within 2,000 feet of a site usl!!d for the dispoial of solid or hazardous
WASt'!!.
o Other impacts:
10
o
o
o
o
o
o
.,r. -
o
o
p
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
2
Potential
Large
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
3
Can Im~ ;:
MItigated Bi
Project CNn.
DYes ON.
oVes ON.
oYl!!S ON.
oVes ON
oVes ON
oV'!!s ON
OV'!!S
ON
OYt1
oVn
ON
ON
oVl!!S
ON
oVes ON
oVes ON
oVes ON
OV'!!S ON
oVes O~
oVes O~
" ' "
. 1 2 3
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large MItigated By
18. Will proposed ~clion ~ffect the ch~r~cter of the eXi~ommunityl Impact Impact Project Change
. 0 DYES
Eumples th~t would ~pply to column 2
· The perm~nent popul~lion of the city, town or villaae in which the 0 0 DYes DNa
project is loc~ted is likely to arow by more than 5 %.
· The municip~1 budlet for capial expenditures or oper~tinl services 0 0 DYes ONo
will incruse by more tNIn 5% per Yelr ~s ~ result of this project.
. Proposed action will conflict with offici~lIy adopted pl~ns or 1~ls. 0 0 DYes DNo
. Proposed action will c~use ~ ch~n.e in the denSity of I~nd use. 0 0 DYes DNa
· Proposed Action will repl~ce or eliminate exislina facilities, structures 0 0 DYes ONo
or ~reas of historic importance to the community. ,
. Development will create a demand for additional community services 0 0 DYes DNa
(e... schools, police and fire. etc.)
· Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. D D DYes DNa
· Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. 0 D DYes DNo
· Other impacts: 0 0 DYes DNo
19. Is there, or is there likely to be. public
potential adverse environmental impactsl
controv~ related to
~O DYES
c
If Any Action In Part 2 II Identified .. I Potential large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of Leld ^Iency
PArt 3 must be prepued if one or more imput(s) is considered to be potentj~lIy ~rle, even if the imp~ct(s) nuy b
mltlpted.
Instructions
Discuss the followina for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1. Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe (if ~pplicable) how the impact could be mitiaated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project chanae(s:
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance. consider:
· The probability of the impact occurrina
· The duration of the impact
· Its irreversibility. includina permanently lost resources of value
· Whether the impact can or will be controlled
· The reaional consequence of the impact
· Its potential diveraence from local needs and aoals
· Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
.,.
~~.. i
.
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
scon L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
July 22, 1993
Deborah Doty
P.O. Box 1181
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Minor Subdivision for Stevens Bluff
SCTM* 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Doty:
Enclosed please find correspondence dated July 14, 1993 from the
Suffolk County Department of Health Services, for your records.
Sincerely,
~Pf-
Planner
enc.
,
.'
· COUNTY OF SUFFOLK.
So~t
fl\S
ROBERT J. GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
MARY E. HIBBERD. M.D.. M.P.H.
COMMISSIONER
July 14, 1993
Melissa Spiro
Town of Southold PlaJming
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
RE: Nina Stevens (aka Stevens Bluff)
SCn1ff: IOlJO-S3-2-S
DeaJ' Ms. Spiro:
The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS; "Department") has received your
letter dated June 15, 1993, concerning the above-referenced project. The Department has no
objection to your designation as lead agency.
Based on a review of the subject coordination, the Department offers the following comments.
However, the Department wishes to reserve its right to provide more detailed infonnation within the
comment period(s) established for this action. Also, these comments should not be construed as an
implicit SCDHS approval or rejection of the project. All applications are reviewed thoroughly with
respect to Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) concerns by appropriate departmental personnel
when SCDHS applications are completed.
An application has not been filed with the Office of Water and Wastewater Management.
Tcchnical comments will be made when an application is f1led.
Werl,Uld line and rhe limits of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Bounclry should be depicted on the
survey, The location of existing wells aJld saJlitaty systems within 200 feet should also be indicated
011 the sile pIal!. In order to reduce the amount of disturbance along the bluff, the Board should
allow for one unified access' to serve both parcels.
DIVISION 01' ENVI~ON!o1ENTAL QUALITY
COUNTY CENTER
RIVERHEA.D, N.Y. 11901-3397
e~2.21 00
""-- .-...--.-.----::::1
, , "1 I" q \I r i-1 I
. '.' 1 ~.~-~--~~:2-~.~-_';:~-~~ ,1 :!J i!
;:111
': 0 .--:..... ; i.i if
- - ,.~J .l....f
I I
, ,I
. : ~
J LJ ~
j
SQUn-:ULD 10",,:N
PU)};;-;~,'JG 30~FO
/
SPiro.
.
~,
. ~
~etter to Melissa
// July 15, 1993
/ Page 2
The applicant must comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and
relevant construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Design and flow
specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details are essential to the review
of this project. These considerations are reviewed completely at the time of SCDHS application.
SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems.
The applicant, therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system without Health
Department approval.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. If'you have any questions, please feel
free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078.
Sincerely Yours,
//{/n sl..
Kimberly Shaw
Sr. Environmental Analyst
Office of Ecology
KS/<unf
cc: Vito Minei, P.E.
Stephen Costa, P.E.
Frank Dowling, SC Planning
~.
.r
· COUNTY OF SUFFOLK .
~~~.
fl\S
ROBERT .J. GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
MARY E. HIBBERD. M.D.. M.P.H.
COMMISSIONER
July 14, 1993
Melissa Spiro
Town of Southold Planning
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
RE: Nina Stevens (aka Stevens Bluff)
SCTMII: 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Spiro:
The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS; "Department") has received your
letter dated June 15, 1993, concerning the above-referenced project. The Department has no
objection to your designation as lead agency.
Based on a review of the subject coordination, the Department offers the following comments.
However, the Department wishes to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the
corrunent period(s) established for this action. Also, these comments should not be construed as an
implicit SCDHS approval or rejection of the project. All applications are reviewed thoroughly with
respect to Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) concerns by appropriate departmental personnel
when SCDHS applications are completed.
An application has not been filed with the Office of Water and Wastewater Management.
Technical comments will be made when an application is fJled.
Wetland line and the limits of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Boundry should be depicted on the
sm"Vey. The location of existing wells and sanitary systems within 200 feet should also be indicated
on the site plan. In order to reduce the amount of disturbance along the bluff, the Board should
allow for one unified access to serve both parcels.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL. QUALITY
COUNTY CENTER
RIVERHEAD. N.Y. 11901.3397
8S2-21oo
r--~~~-~-~
: 1Lj It] 0 (lj lOO
>,1 , U I
i L.U j JUL 2 0 1900 i' I
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
.-
Letter to Melissa
July 15, 1993
Page 2
Spiro .
.
...
The applicant must comply with the requirements of the Suffolk: County Sanitary Code and
relevant construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Design and flow
specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details are essential to the review
of this project. These considerations are reviewed completely at the time of SCDHS application.
SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems.
The applicant, therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system without Health
Department approval.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. If you have any questions, please feel
free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078.
Sincerely Yours,
//(/n ~.
Kimberly Shaw
Sr. Environmental Analyst
Office of Ecology
KS/amf
cc: Vito Minei, P.E.
Stephen Costa, P.E.
Frank Dowling, SC Planning
.
.
PLANN[NG BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
seOTI L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 1[971
Fax (516) 765-1823
JUly 16, 1993
Deborah Doty
P.O. Box 1181
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Minor Subdivision for Stevens Bluff
SCTM# 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Doty:
The enclosed report dated JUly 7, 1993, from The Suffolk County
Planning Commission will be reviewed at the Planning Board's
August 9, 1993 public meeting.
Please note that this report is for you information only. It
has not been adopted by the Planning Board.
Sincerely,
!~b
Planner
enc.
",~"", ,
.
. .
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
SueRc.e
,.0;8
I'e
...... ..
ROBERT J. GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
ARTHUR H. KUNZ
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
July 7, 1993
Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman
Town of Southold Planning Board
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision - Stevens Bluff (Nina A. Stevens)
1762.19 feet nfo Oregon Road, adjoining Long Island Sound,
Town of Southold, New York.
Dear Mr. Ward:
The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on
July 7, 1993, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Proposed Minor
Subdivision - Stevens Bluff (Nina A. Stevens)" referred to it pursuant to
Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code.
The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative
to this application.
'.ry ~..
~~owlin~~Jsr.
~~~~sion ~iew
Planner
Division
File: S-SD-93-06
FD:mb
Attachment
cc:
J. Baier, C.E., SCDHS
" i'" l' ,IJ' \Y]"
1\ ' d, ' \.!!:) S
I "I ~
UU~ ~_ 2
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
. -'"~
~r;;J
I ~, !
i
...I
H. LEE DENNISON BUILDING
.
VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
.
HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788
.
1516l 853-5192
.
.
.
"
File No. S-SD-93-06
Resolution No. ZSR-93-BO of Suffolk County Planning Commission
Pursuant to Sections AI4-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Sections AI4-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County
Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County
Planning Commission on June 17, 1993, with respect to a proposed plat
entitled, "Proposed Minor Subdivision - Stevens Bluff (Nina A.
Stevens)" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting
premises located 1762.19 feet nlo Oregon Road, adjoining Long Island
Sound, in the Town of Southold, New York, and
WHEREAS,
said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning
Commission at its meeting on July 7, 1993, and
WHEREAS ,
the Commission has voted to approve with certain changes said
referral, Be It Therefore
RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and
adopts the report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Be It
Further
RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is approved subject to the meeting of the
following conditions that are deemed necessary to help preserve the
natural and aesthetic attributes of the shoreline of Long Island
Sound.
1. No sanitary disposal facility shall be installed or constructed
or within 100 feet of the top of the bluff.
2. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and
improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be
discharged down the face of the bluff.
3. Erosion and sediment control measures shall be required during
and immediately after construction on each lot to insure that
stormwater runoff will not carry eroded and other deleterious
materials into Long Island Sound.
4. Access to the beach shall be only by means of a suitable
structure located at or near the common lot line. The structure
shall be designed and constructed in a manner that will result in
the least disturbance of the stability of the bluff.
5. Conditions 1-4, inclusive, shall be filed as covenants and
restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the
granting of approval to this subdivision.
. '
,>
,
.
.
Resolution No. ZSR-93-80
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S-SD-93-06
These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the
request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a
majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold
after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be
entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to
such modification shall not be required.
6. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of
Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County
Clerk's office which affects lots in this subdivision.
The Commission also offers the following comments on the map:
1. A common driveway should be provided to serve as access to the
lots as Soundview Avenue may become a heavily travelled road in
the future.
2. A buffer or conservation easement at least 50 feet in width
should be created along Soundview Avenue to help preserve the
natural vegetation along the road. so as to enhance the
aesthetics of the road. contribute to the preservation of
residential amenities from traffic activities and noise and to
help minimize the erosion potential.
Motion by: Commissioner Stahlman
Seconded by: Commissioner Cichanowicz
Commission Vote:
12 Present
Yeas
Nays
Abstentions
12
o
o
Dated July 7. 1993
Hauppauge. New York
Suffolk County Planning Commission
.
.
DEBORAH DOTY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
WEST CREEK AVENUE
P. O. Box 1181
CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935
516-734-6648
FAX 516-734-7702
June 30, 1993
BY HAND
Planning Department
Town of Southold
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
chcc k .'~ (I ~")(_f
RE: Stevens Bluff
Minor Subdivision of 4.4603 acres on Private Road, Cutchogue, NY
SCTM # 1000-83-02-08
Dear Melissa:
Enclosed please find I.O.L.A. check number 550 in the amount of $400.00 in
payment of the Long Environmental Assessment Form review fee for the above-referenced
two lot minor subdivision.
Thank you.
Respectfully submitted,
-.
c~~-
Deborah Doty
Ene!.
cc: Nina A. Stevens
DD:bdr
u~ (ii} it; 11 \':17 ~
r.ly'.~,.c;':z ,,;.,.i';:,,_~.l;:;_.._'~'~~~..~~2 '~7
JUN 3 0 1993
Sl.(BFIce:-
v'vtS
.
,,;rpr~<>-,.~
'JP;~fFO{,f" ":~
..uY",~" . ~<2-~:\'
I!J~v '~
,Jj'.::, ~ ~
~o '., . r,
'~c:r.> . ('.. :;e!
\. ..- ,,\~ l. '.~""" t7i ,-
.~ . tit ~
\-'~\"ooo'"... ~"'i ; ~r'
\ ";:-l''': ~~ f!
. ''Of " 1_ .,-:S .J.
'* '," ,.,. 1...-/0....
~~;Y
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennen Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOrf L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
June 29, 1993
Deborah Doty
West Creek Avenue
P.O. Box 1181
Cutchogue, New York 11935
RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision
Stevens Bluff
Cutchogue
SCTM# 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Doty:
In confirmation of your June 24, 1993, telephone conversation
with Melissa Spiro, please find the fOllowing in regard to the
Planning Board's June 14, 1993 conditional sketch approval:
The Planning Board will allow the irrevocable offer of
dedication required in Number 3 of the conditional sketch
approval to be extinguished if, prior to the Town's acceptance
of the offer of dedication, the adjacent parcel of land shown on
the map as n/o/f of Joseph Hannabury ISCTM# 1000-83-2-12)
is developed in a manner requiring road improvements. In this
case, a 25 foot wide right-of-way will be required along the
easterly property line of the Hannabury property so that the
25 foot wide right-of-way, together with the 25 foot wide
right-of-way shown on the property as n/o/f of Nina A. Stevens
ISCTM# 1000-83-2-11) will result in a 50 foot wide
right-of-way.
Please contact this office if you have any further questions
regarding the above.
Sincerely,
r;f,ckvJ g Vove/
Richard G. Ward ~s
Chairman
cc: Raymond Jacobs, Highway Superintendent
James Richter, Engineering Inspector
.
':::::;Z;C';_
__<~,):;\j("Dl./~t.;i
:' :?~ -- --rrn:.t., "-.;:\~~
'l:::>JC'~'~'.,f.~ ~~ ~
~;, ':,,, )\ ,'}:,\'(>,,"- ~ t.~'
" . "':," -- .'<. '" ({
<~2:;j~~)Ci
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. 1r.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
scon L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
TO:
John Bredemeyer, III
President, Board of Trustees
FROM:
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
RE:
Minor Subdivision
Nina Stevens (aka Stevens Bluff)
Cutchogue
SCTM# 1000-83-2-8
DATE:
June 23, 1993
Enclosed please find a copy of the subdivision proposal for the
above mentioned property. This has been referred to your Board
for review since the property is located adjacent to Long Island
SOund.
On June 14, 1993 the Planning Board granted sketch approval to
the two lot proposal and started the lead agency coordination
process. As a condition of sketch approval, the Planning Board'
required that the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area be indicated on
the final map.
..'~
.
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
scon L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
June 16, 1993
Cramer, Voorhis & Associates
Environmental & Planning Consultants
54 N. Country Rd.
Miller Place, NY 11764
Re: Review of EAF
Nina Stevens (aka Stevens Bluff)
SCTM# 1000-83-2-8
Dear Messrs. Cramer and Voorhis:
The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the
Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned
subdivision to your office for review. Also enclosed are the
following:
1. Copy of the subdivision map dated April 29, 1993
2. Copy of Planning Board correspondence dated June 14, 1993
The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process
on June 14, 1993. The $400.00 review fee has been submitted by
the applicant. If all is in order, the Board will make their
SEQRA determination at the August 9, 1993 public meeting.
Please submit your report no later than August 2, 1993 in order
for the Board to review it before the meeting date.
The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover.
If there are any questions, please contact the Planning Staff.
Sincerely,
(i). J I' i!j
'Aio1VJWc! J!J.
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
11avl
''/11;
enc.([flF- i",h,I"~ fe"'''.,,)
f '~''''P
,-~'
.
.
-...
~. ."
~
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOTI L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fa. (516) 765-1823
June 15, 1993
Deborah Doty
West Creek Avenue
P.O. Box 1181
Cutchogue, New York 11935
RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision
Stevens Bluff
Oregon Road, Cutchogue
SCTM# 1000-83-2-8
Dear Ms. Doty:
The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town
Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 14, 1993:
Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the
lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action.
Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant
sketch approval on the map dated April 29, 1993 with the
fOllowing conditions:
1. The north/south access to the proposed lots from
Oregon Road is to beyia the 25 foot right-of-way
located on the property shown on the proposed map as
n/o/f of Nina A. Stevens (SCTM# 1000-83-2-10.3).
(For the record, the subject parcel has deeded access
over a 16 foot right-of-way as indicated on the
proposed sUbdivision map. This access is over the land
n/o/f of Joseph Hannabury and the easterly side of
the land n/o/f of Nina A. Stevens.
On September 28, 1981, a minor subdivision for Nina
Stevens was approved with a 25 foot right-of-way along
the westerly side of the property line to provide
access to the four soundfront lots. The proposed
access for the Stevens Bluff subdivision is via this
25 foot right of way, which is to be improved as part
of the 1981 approval as described in reports from
James Richter, Engineering Inspector, dated January 6,
1993 and December 2, 1992.)
/
.
.
Stevens Bluff
June IS, 1993
Page 2
2. The 50 foot wide east/west right-of-way is to be
improved with a 16 foot wide road as per Section
15-3 of the Highway Specifications. The improvements
are to be continued within the 16 foot right-of-way
over the property shown as n/o/f of Joseph
Hannabury. An irrevocable offer of dedication is to
be offered to the Town of Southold for the 50 foot
wide right-of-way area within the proposed
subdivision.
Road profiles and drainage maps are to be submitted
for review by the Planning Board and the Engineering
Inspector.
3. An irrevocable offer of dedication is to be offered to
the Town of Southold in order to~llow the 25 foot
right-of-way shown on the minor ~ubdivision of Nina
Stevens to be widened to a total of 50 feet in width
in the future. In addition, a Declaration of Covenants
and Restrictions is to be prepared for the proposed
subdivision stating that access is to be granted to
the parcels of land adjacent to, and in the vicinity
of the subject property, over both the north/south 50
foot wide accessway and the east/west 50 foot wide
accessway.
4. The Coastal Erosion Hazard Area must be indicated on
the final maps. All building envelopes must be
landward of such area.
Sketch plan approval is conditional Upon submission of final
maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an
extension of time is requested. by the applicant, and granted by
the Planning Board. The final maps (2 mylars and 5 paper
prints) must contain a current stamp of Health Department
approval, and must be submitted before a final public hearing
will be set.
The sketch plans have been referred to the Suffolk County
Planning Commission and the Town Trustees for review. You will
be notified upon receipt of reports from these agencies. The
Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions
upon review of the reports and review of the final maps.
Therefore, it is not necessary to prepare the draft Declaration
of Covenants and Restrictions at this time.
The sketch plans have also been referred to the Cutchogue Fire
District for their recommendation as to whether a firewell is
necessary for fire protection. You will be notified under
separate Cover if the Planning Board will be requiring a
firewell as part of any subdivision approval.
./
/" ~tevens Bluff
June 15, 1993
Page 3
.
.
.
The Long Environmental Assessment Form has been forwarded to the
Board's environmental consultant for review. There is a $400
fee for this review. This must be paid in full by your client
before authorization can be given to the consultant to proceed
with the review. The check should be made payable to the Town of
Southold.
The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided
that it is inadequate in size for a reservation of land for park
and playground use. Therefore, a cash payment in lieu of land
reservation will be required as per Section AI06-38 (E) of the
Town Code. The amount to be deposited with the Town Board shall
be $4000.00 (two thousand dollars per lot for each vacant lot in
the SUbdivision.) Payment is required prior to any final
endorsement of the subdivision.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding
the above.
Sincerely,
1f,~ )j 1tIoudmrs
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
.
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
-.
.~
~".7::
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
-;~<-::'(Y:Yj-'^
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765- I 938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD
Fax (5 I 6) 765-1823
Mathew Martin, Secretary
Cutchogue Fire District
New Suffolk Lane
Cutchogue, New York 11935
~~ /0- 1973
U
Dear Mr. Martin:
Plea notify this office
needed. Please specify whether
will be needed.
Please reply by (-]0
Cooperation.
~-
iJ :J -0..4 - 0 ~
j7 Enclosed
/()~
as to whether any fire wells are
shallow wells or electric wells
,l9~. Thank you for your
r7r t4l~ YS~s/i / /
UI~/~--1' /(, 7/4-0/ Z.
r?l,ctlIIRJ) G. k/rl~J)
c!1aJ.rman
enc.
~,
-~
~~
.
rp?22Z::..,:,-,.",
,1f'~",UfFDl';'~
,/C \.;tV '1,."
(J'~ va '\
..A'''~ ~. ~\\
/,T "-,' ~ ~
)5 ., ""'J"
Ij <I) Ii' ""'
\1 't:> y\ ~
\\ .>' .~~~.'.
,,")', ", ,,~
"<'/0 "" "'~"'c'r
."., ~;-",. ",pY
CO",~
.
...
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G, Ward
Mark S, McDonald
Kenneth L Edwards
SCOTI L HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765.1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
-::rU(\~ IS
,199-:'
,-i
Suffolk County Planning Commision
H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor
Veterans Memorial Highway
Hauppauge, New York 11788
.tl
Attention:
Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner
Subdivision Review Division
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the
Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed
subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission:
Map of - N.M S+"~m<.., (",b S+(l~(O)s llAtHarnlet/Locality C u+<!..ko ~ \I-e.
S.C.D.P.W. Topo No.: Zoning 1(- RD
S.C. Tax Map No.: 1000- R3
Major Sub. Minor Sub. ><
2
p,
Site Plan
Cluster_
MATERIAL SUBMITTED:
Sl<e:'c~ X'1/~~lq3
Prelimiaary Plat (3 copies) _Road Profiles (1) _
Drainage Plans (1) ___Topogroaphical Map (1) _
Site Plan (1) ___ Grading Plan (1) ____
Other materials (specify and give number of copies)
(,) 1'10""''''0 ?oa..J. (,I'~IH '''''"?,,,,^,,\ce. k"";\'I"'~ rnaA. rt't."!rt""....,t-s..
c.\ C~'f trf '1~6Iel A.f~l'<>~e.\. """1' "oJ t"5'Mq':N\j f't6''\' "'~rr,l-\o '1\1 bJI~IB (".'r"'f'~(P.
Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet
CONTINUED
, '.~
II
.
.
REFERRAL CRITERIA:
SEQRA STATUS:
1. The project is an QUnlistedV (Type I) (Type II)Action.
2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration)
(Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by
the Planning Board.
3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes) ~
4. The proposed division has received approval from the
S.C. Dept of Health. (Yes) ~.
u
k:th
s
We request acknowledgement of
receipt of this referral (Yes) (No)
Referral received
by Suffolk County
and assigned File
19
Planning Commission
NO.
Very truly yours,
~~ 4, 7t/~
Richard G. Ward ~5.
Chairman
~~-.
.'
.
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chainnan
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDooald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOTI L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O, Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
-:TUf\<L IS
I
19'1~
RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request
Dear Reviewer:
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8
(State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental
Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the fOllowing:
1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below;
2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead
agency; and
Enclosed
Environmental
3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.
please find a copy of the proposal and a completed
Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response.
;\),1\0. Sl-euet\1<, (", I;, c.. 'S-,-kU{!\J<;' "1Ju-{..{:'1
Sc-T"".,'boO_ fB -2. -R
Project Name:
Requested Action:
~'{\O~ t,,'I,6),U\<,,'OV'\.-
~7;;U5 ,,'(..4-+') Ov"\ 'i. Lf'o~
::l.. lo-i-<, (Q7. 07{, 't f\ """,1
~Cf'eS .
SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I
('t. ) Unlisted
Contact Person: /Y)I'\ I<"<.,A S:e R
(516') -765-l93l3 I 0
"'-"'..,
.
.
The lead agency will determine the
impact statement (ElS) on this project.
the date of this letter, please respond
have an interest in being lead agency.
need for an environmental
Within thirty (30) days of
in writing whether or not you
Planning Board Position:
(/<) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency
status for this action.
( Other. (See comments below).
Comments:
Please feel free to contact this office for further information.
Sincerely,
KJJ 4/ 1r/J "'l5
Richard G. Ward
Chairman
cc:
Beara sf Aflpeals (M~\" ...,,+ ~l\~~r\
Board of Trustees &"...1 ./,.In )
BuilaiR~'DQpar~meRt
Southold Town Board
~Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services
~NYSDEC - Stony Brook
NYSDEC - Albany
s.c. Dap~. af PUhlig v7Qrki:
IT 5 Army C'''''''''''r ,....-f J;'''"''Jint:)ot''s
N.Y.f:. Dept. Qf Traa~pgrt~~ion
* Maps are enclosed for your. review
Coordinating agencies
.
.
~Le
M5
DEBORAH DOTY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
WEST CREEK AVENUE
P. O. Box 1181
CUTCHOGUE. NY 11935
516-734-6648
FAX 516-734-7702
June 9, 1993
BY HAND
, r ci (0 _')e.,~<
Planning Department
Town of Southo1d
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southo1d, NY 11971
RE: Stevens Bluff
Minor Subdivision of 4.4603 acres on Private Road, Cutchogue, NY
SCTM # 1000-83-02-08
Dear Melissa:
Enclosed please find check number 939 in the amount of $2,000,00 in payment of the
filing fee for the above-referenced two lot minor subdivision.
Thank you.
Respectfully submitted,
-
c~~~~-
Deborah Doty
Encls.
cc: Nina A. Stevens
DD:bdr
w
IE [& II U WI II@
JUN 10/993 !lJ!.
r'~1
SOUIHOLD :n~ I
PLAr:!..N!NG Bo;~;'!Q.._ I
._--1
.
.
Sub CCreci\....)
f\3
(r)S
DEBORAH DOTY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
WEST CREEK AVENUE
P. O. Box 1181
CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935
516-734-6648
FAX 516-734-7702
May 6, 1993
BY HAND
Planning Board
Town of Southold
53095 Main Road
P.O, Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
RE: Stevens Bluff
Minor Subdivision of 4.4603 acres on Private Road, Cutchogue, NY
SCTM # 1000-83-02-08
Dear Members of the Planning Board:
I represent Nina A, Stevens, owner of the above-referenced premises, Ms, Stevens
wishes to obtain approval to subdivide the parcel into two lots, Accordingly, enclosed please
find the following: .___- ._
I. Twelve surveys redated April 29, 1993;
2, A copy of the deed, dated December 23, 1969, describing the premises as
"PARCEL TWO";
3. Application for plat approval;
4. Letter, dated May 5, 1993, regarding drainage, grading and road construction;
5. Part I of the Full Environmental Assessment Form;
6, Copy of tax map showing area;
7, The Planning Board's Questionnaire; and
8, Letter, dated May 5, 1993, granting the undersigned authority to sign
applications with respect to the subdivision,
I trust the enclosed will meet with the Board's approval, If you have any questions or
wish to discuss this matter, I may be reached at 734-6648.
Respectfully submitted,
-
~
Deborah Doty
MAY 6 1993
rn
Encls.
cc: Nina A. Stevens
DD:bdr
SOUTHOLD TOW~
PlA~~I~G BOARO
. ... <<
.
.~
/o'll'~ ;.U:FOllt /' ,~,
AJY'~\;,."c ~ "'\
tl~'.' ..,:.,
"".::::a ,.~' :2 I.:
Q .' , ~"
en h. :;"
...., .. tp,
~~~~ <~.. ~~:I
~~
-
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOTT L HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box I 179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
TO:
Victor Lessard, Principal BUilding Inspector
Melissa Spiro, Planner ~5
Inquiry in regard to Proposed Subdivision for
Nina Stevens property, SCTMJI 1000-83-2-8
March 1, 1993
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
The Planning Board has received a pre-application inquiry
in regard to sUbdividing the above mentioned 4.79 acre parcel
into 2 lots.
As I discussed with you and Linda Kowalski on February
10, 1993, the property in question is a landlocked parcel, with
access to Oregon Road over two other parcels of land
(SCTMJI 1000-83-2-11 owned by Hannabury and
SCTMJl1000-2-10.3 owned by Nina Stevens).
SCTMJI 1000-83-2-10.3 was created by the Planning Board in
a subdivision approved on September 28, 1981. It was indicated
as Section 2 of the subdivision. The road specifications for
the subdivision were recently reviewed by the Planning Board and
James Richter, Engineering Inspector. The road is to be
constructed as per the report dated December 2, 1992 from James
Richter. A copy of this report was sent to you under separate
cover.
From our discussion, it is my understanding that 280A
approval is not required for the proposed 2 lot subdivision of
SCTMJI 1000-83-2-8 and that it is within the authority of the
Planning Board to ensure that proper access is provided to the
proposed 2 lot subdivision.
Please confirm in writing if I am correct in my
understanding of the above.
Encl.
cc: Linda Kowalski, Zoning Board of Appeals
51~ ~elZ" \l;a,,-o... ~'s.s..rb. ,..-\;re'o, r J,:sc.,....,A ~ro("'se..IL ....( L:".g", r-:Ol<l"'\sk.;, S,k r~-
c~("'tb. 1\..c4: J;I'toA ~~ (a~"r.Sl.
tt6
r;"019
'['0,
~r:
ifr
i J if I
f!iB
j1jij
I
'II!I
"I' I.
;, i II
~ftH ~
!lr!t;
'" I, Q..
II I I I
~ ;" ... . ~
II! I!
ni'~{
(t!
1i
~:l@..
!!
r-rr H
lr;n
! !'"
. I i
u~q
I~.-,
~I
I'
t:
ij
"
~
!t@
'l'n
. go
;'t"l~ ~
~ ~ -< -i
CL'.....-<
....... So
,-:;' (.n-n
:z; ~ III VI
.. ~ ., c:
. < ~
... ;;;'.....
o . 0
~ )>r-
'" '"
.
^
'<
"'I'
~ 15 ~ ~
t f~ ~ ~
,- c
101 -i
!8i 5
, , 5
I.
o
OJ
<>J
.
.
h~i;
HrE ~
:--1::"
1'li
"
If
.,........,.
-r
I
,
,
.1
~I ,i$~
T'"
i ~;1
I
SfI '1< '"0 0..
...z._-
,.
"
"
...~.!.o~r
I
<
o
.,.
~
1~I;mi
~ n;:~
rrri:ii
"
...
"";.
v
"'0
'0
~
Jlr'"
I'.!!~f
.,t..
~~~;~ ~
;!~!j ~
bi~t
~~l~~
~ ~i~.ii
C
"
~
I
I
~::: ,.;"
';i;
j
<
~..
I
,
"
E:'
~:; I
~ !":
.
~ ..
"
~4"t.~
.
o
.<
"Ji":.
,"
",
'"
"
.... I:.~
..".....
"
"
,
,I
"
!
re=i
i'~;~
/,
,
i
I
..::,
. .
"
.-
~:
N,
"
~ :
"
.:!'",9/0 i;;:
.,.
'Oft ...."tU "" In lit ~o
0"'01.0''''
;(.
---l~ _ I"....!..
...'t.. ,,". ~
'E< U. "0 D04 I~
".;;;c;;- -l--
Il{ He "0.0"
U",
~, 1
i~
.
....~/~
'S'
<:l
, '.
.
,
/
~
"
~.
~.
6\ ~3/
~ ",0
l:.l:.
1:/"
.~
l'
..
"
r.
en
;t
"
"'
~,
C1
.
.-
.e
-ofrerly
I
.
"
StCTlON
2
AREA: 17.3~B5 ACRES
i>'? - 'Z -IO,~
"'
/
. /
/
/
/
.1
.
~
R;9h/
of
Way
.... I" 1.'-.. .5TJ"<~ .
/
I
Joseph
Honn 0 bury
NOTE: I. .:- MONUMENT
2. 0:- PIPE
.J CONTOUR LINES SHOWN THUS; - - - -60-- - -
ARF REFERENOED ro u.s.c. a G. SURVEY DATUM
/
/
1~;.4_96'
-'/fIO"': /
! "" '1
/
~
~
.
0 . . : I
. . \
J \ \ \ I
I \ \ \
/ /680.17" \ \ -
I \ \ \
25.02'
\ I
I.."')..... .srAKt' /76219 ~ moll. ,
I \ \ \ FouND I
I \ ,
\ \
,
, .J
~
...=::-:tA-~...HAi' . A 1~e>t;>>! . t>::>..-~
THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR Ai
I nr<"> IN THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH ~1!.~_~.~~"-'?!.~
~ From: PECOI'IIC SURVEYOR; o. C. (516)765-1797
. '-4.~IVD
SOUND
Plil2
\
;&
--?
~.
I .
/ '
I 1
I I
I I
, I
/
4+ qt.,:
V 11'2:
~ !~
I
'1"7,07' - i'O/3:n ::' "i',I4I'fj
'17, ~ IS' - 10/3:17.: '8'", '8"i"8'
I ,
!
o
":\\
-;t.
o
-
~
I
I
I
I
!
\
\
U')
-- -
Iq.327:x, II-
\ ,.-- ~_.
Su~tte6 6/~'f~~ ~'t D. btt
#
~Ob
.1
/q ? '17
../" "
SURVEY SHOWING ENCROACHMENTS
AT CUTCHOGUE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y.
7000 - 83 - 02 - PIO 08,70.6 & 77
Scale: 1" = 50'
Sept.21, 1993
"'"
...<S>.
.......
00.
~
~
N
'\Illite; 'r\'VV\ \i..V\J)\O\f'J~ ~Ql..A..\~V'
",Y'i\,'"", o.f "c~",JI loc,J-,''-'>Y--
J;.. \,(ol'C>~c\ l?o"c\'- s\.o~;"'J
c:-.ll .~c.-I,;o"''" ~ (>(''>~
'\'""'''&~c,. 1-0 e~~+ ((.m~ ~
'!."J~
51-AND
ONG I ..10 --0
l. 50LJ~ ~
----
I
1
~O
~
~~
""0
u-~k:
<S._ _ 0;
r~ F'(.~"'~<l....'''''l
.~ . ~.Y .-
. II ~
-9'u-~ '---- ,,-.---<::,
Oc
~~
\f~
,
,
~O
~
~
Oc,.u-
C'
'c
o1?
\$'0
<e
<"u<S!
""c
o1?
\$'0
""
"'"
"'<5'.
..."".
00.
~
~.---
'. f '/JaY
.--150' ~igl1t 0
t '/J'1
16'~!~
19'IZ'ZO' w. t-\. 5'fEVEI'I=
s. If I'III'I~
1'1I0
Ie. NO. 49618
------
NI0/f
~
~
rf
(j
~
o
93-149A
'.
..
l
"'1
~.~ o. ).'~'d}~
""0-'0-9$0
O~ '10 '>, '0. 'n.... '"''
"
<
c
~
"
,
,
'.
::.
~
>-
0
~
~
::>
~
~
0
>-
~
Z
::>
0
V,
@
.. !
I~ 'I
I
Q
1
~
~
~
.
J:
",
~~~
tl!
Ul;
]JjJ
ii
i~@",
Ii
~ j
I ~ ! ~
UL(
no o. "s ..s
I
,
,! I
~~~ I
;,~.L
.... ~ I~
" Il
I
I
-~=..
,,,.". 'I
:1
ii! !
i; ii
""
~
~'nl
~Jjijl
IIII!
" J : , ~
II. ,
--2--.
!dil
IiI i l_
It i Ii
,I,
Eli
'vi
~ i , 1,
lli J J
f ~i
.'.
1 ~:
~
-
.L
.~
,0-1:-~
:A .
<~ ~-
~ '0"
4<-
\' <l'
\ ~
"', '
/\
_//50' "
~
, _'"C- ~-~:-:
~
'!'
~
;,
...
00.
'"
.
\
\
\
(j)
LOT@
LOT
1- <0
~ :A
. <"
'-t- ~
U\o. l;<'\
4<-
if
.iR'
. 0-00- Exisling
6/.00 0050' Righi 01
,'Way
;.. Right__/ of Way ,
.:....;...{_.~~"":v~ .~~3 y.,...:-- . ',~ "canterli'!..
_ L--- --' .:. 't' _
~ I~~~ t... '\proposed Bluestone PavtJmtNIl . ~
~~ '~~~::;si:~q ~ HANNA~URY. DOROTH;:7:U~~::;i;;' Sp"'~,i/;7:";,::2;~~:,~~X-
MARY A HANNABURY & P~tRICIA A. GIl.DER~fEEVE J >~<~~ ~~.
Ir/ 'It / \$"....-::.
(.9 1.0 / ~
~~E ~ ~
Scale" 1"=50'
PropoaBd 2- 75 50'
64.94 "
\
\
-cB.
;p~/
0/
....
g.
PLAN & PROFILE
STEVENS BLUFF
AT CUTCHOGUE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY.
Feb. 23, 7995
T esl Boring
81.6/.0
0/. 64.94
DR. BROWN LOAM
I'
b.
.S
~
,
~
SR. eLA Yf'Y La
,.
,/' existing grade
!-_f /.433"._
---
BROWN eLA YEY
SANO
~
~
>
o
0.
\
'- proposed grade
6'
-
o
.
.g-
.
MOWN AImiUM
TO VE"RY
COARSE
SAND
17'
Datum >: eJ. 50
o
o
6
12
"
PROFILE:
Scale, Vert.
Horiz.
1" = 10'
1" = 50'
DRAINAGE CRITERIA
16'1f275 = 4400 sq.ll.
4400 11 0.42 :or 0.3 '"' 554 cU.fI.
554/42.2 = /3.1 V.F.
PROVIDE I L.P. 8', 12' deep 8. Dome
11971
93-749
l.
t.
~
~
Test Boring
1- <'0
~ A
~- <''"i.._
~.,\",
..
OR. BROWN LOAM
'.
I"
BR. CLA YEY LOA
3'
BROWN CLA YEY I'
SAND
6'
BROWN MEDIUM
TO VERY
COARSE
SAND
17'
PLAN & PROFILE
STEVENS BLUFF
AT CUTCHOGUE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY.
Feb. 23, 1995
Aprit 19, 1995 (revision)
LOT (j)
4+/3
66.92
II'/;
(p'/;
(plP
'.
\
'sf, 66.92'
..
~
'J
,..,
..
't
1-
<'0 ~
A ~
~ .>
\\'" o.
.
\
LOT (j)
if
t?
....
-
;
J.. .~
I}
,
,
,
/
/
,..-...",/
/
~
S>p'.
00.
~
/
/
,
,
/
Way
~
"....;~.._;,;;;,~;:-~::,-
,
1JI""
PROFH..E
Sc.: 1" = SO'
_iSIIng grade
--.! 1.433% _
prOflO$ed grad6
; Dafum * 6/. 50 '$
DRAINAGE CRITERIA
PA VEAlENT - /6'''413' e 6608 sq.".
GRASSED SHOULDERS- 12'''413'c4956 sq. fl.
6608x 0.6 . OJ 7' * ,674 cu.ll.
4956x 0.3 " 0.1 7 * 253 cu.ll.
927 cu.ll.
927/42.2 c 22 V.F.
PROVIDE 2 CP.S 8" /2' D66p
PROFILE:
Sc.: V.,.t,
Horiz.
""
>S
1" = 10'
1" = !SO'
~
__(p1.
-'-- -
/
-
Existing
. (,/J 50' Right of
~& Way
!...I .......... , ",..... slone biMd """_1
/ /~9, ~'i:f ,. lM,~,! , 10 S#1IItIrMI To... ~
/
--,'_.,"-- I
~;~28'~~HANVA~Y. DOROTHY E. ksKOW~:2'
MARY A. Y & PA~ A. t::I DERstEEvE
J ,
,
/
/
o
III
~,
~
'"
0....
~
~
61. 61.0
~
.s
-
~
~
..
I
:>.
a.
....
o
&
'ti
..
IoJr& @ ~J \l7 f1 r~
ifJ[ IlJ'J1 2 5 Ql; j
SOUTHuLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD ._i
Cl
Cl
.
Cl
. LlC. NO. 496/8
PEC P.C.
(516) 765 -
P. O. BOX 909
MAIN ROAD
SOUTHOLD, N. Y. /197/
"". ..~-