Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-79.-2-7
MAJOR SUBDIVISION —� application received 07 11 p Yield map received Application reviewed at work sessionp� ® OK a�re Gv4� ` Xro. OK Applicant advised of necessary revisions 01 Revised submission receivediso- iolo IL, AW__ OK Inro. PcoIL Sketch plan approval Xro, OK P -with conditions Lead Agency Coordination u SEQRA determination o J Preliminary maps received fa I Preliminary maps reviewed at work session nro. OK v a -revisions A_i OKro M q U o Road profiles/drainage submitted Q IXro.` OK revisions rAM r INFO. OK z Road profiles/drainage reviewed be Engineer INFO. OK � V) Z NFO.` OK o Sent to County Planning Commission �ro. KO lI p Receipt of County Planning Report tl Review of SCPC report Xro.` OK o V) z Preliminary hearing Preliminary approval z -with conditions oa = r c Sent to Fire Commissioner 5 Receipt of firewell location Notification to applicant to include on final map C4 > c:> Draft Covenants and Restrictions received 01 o d.. uro; OK Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed NFO,` OK Filed Covenants and Restrictions received �ZN' Bond estimate submitted Bond adopted by PB Bond adopted by TB Payment of bond Payment of inspection fee Determination of park &playground fee Park&plaYeround fee adopted by TB Payment of park &playground fee Open Space documents Documents reviewed by TA I T`j 9L OK Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval Final Public Hearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions Endorsement of subdivision iPLANNING BOARD MEMBl BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� CQG Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman ='Z' y� P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J. CREMERS Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS coo � Telephone (631) 76b-1938 RICHARD CAGGLANO GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. a Fax(631) 765-3136 -1 'yi�rol �aOt' PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Subdivision Application Form Name of Subdivision: Forestbrook at Bayview Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000-0 7 9 . 0 0-02. 00-007 . 0 0 0 Type of Subdivision: Major K X9&&w Xxx4mg Cluster Subdivision: Yes X`$3F Hamlet: Southold 5250 Street Location: North Bayview Road Acreage: 37 . 771 acres Number of Lots: 17 Zoning District: A - C (Agricultural-Conservation District) Date: May 22 , 2001 .t' Please list name, mailing address, and phone member for the people below: Anthony M. Hurtado, Secretary Applicant: Forestbrook Builders Inc. (Contract Vendee) 3 Penny Lane, St. James, New York 11780 (631) 774-5790 Agent handling the application: Lark & Folts, Esqs. (Contact Person) Main Road - P. O. Box 973, Cutchogue, NY 11935 (631) 734-6807 Property Owner(s): Mary Grace Dougherty, Eva G. Heifetz, Thomas P. Dougherty, Jr. and Michael P. Dougherty Michael Bender and Rhoda Bender Jeanne Pugliese, as sole devisee under the Last Will and Testament of Dominic Pugliese, Deceased c/o Martin Silver, Es . , 330 Motor Parkwa Suite 201, Hauppauge, New York 11788, 631 35- 5 5 Howard W. Young, N.Y.S. L. S. Surveyor: Young & Young, Land Surveyors 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 (631) 727-2303 Engineer: Thomas C. Wolpert, N.Y.S. P.E. (Young & Young, Land Surveyors) 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 (631) 727-2303 Attorney: Lark & Folts, Esqs. Main Road - P. O. Box 973 , Cutchogue, New York 11935 (631) 734-6807 Other Agent(s): None Has this property had a previous application to the Planning Board? XK E No Has this property previously received a SEQRA review? Yv& No Have you had any pre-submission conferences with the Planning Board? TW No Does this application have variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals? XYMX No Appl. No. N/A Date N/A Is this property adjacent to any bodies of water? ylw No Are there any wetlands on the property? Yes Are there public water mains in an adjacent street? Yes Is public water proposed for the subdivision? Yes I Are there any existing easements on the property? Yesx Is there a proposed sale of development rights on part of the property? s No Is there a mortgage on the property? XNK No Does the owner own any adjacent properties? WW No Are there any building permits currently pending on this property? YkW No FORESTBROOKBBUILDERS INC. Signature of Preparer //i Date 5/22/01 By: lin ony ur a o, Secrerary • APPLICANT • TRANSACTIONAL UISCI,OSURR FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NANR. Forestbrook Builders Inc. _ (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person 's or company 's name. ) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply. ) Tax grievance variance Change of zone Approval of plan Exemption from plat or official map Other (If "Other,-, name the activity. ) no you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee or the Town of Southold? "Relationship- includes by blood, marriage, or business interest_ 'puniness interest' means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (oremploymentby) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If you answered ^YES,^ complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town or Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself ( the applicant) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibll.ng, parent, or child is (check all that apply ) : A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant Is a corporation) ; D) the legal or beneficial owner or any interest in a noncorporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) ; C) an oCCicer, director, partner, or employee of then applicant; or U) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSIITP Submitte'dn 22nd Tb y Ma 2001 SignahuCo gy -- - rrl ��r, n,,m,Anthony_M.. Hurtado, .Secretary :J•�" 003Mliq! 'uw6iw�w-w....w.�ratRarowww�.. Y . T LlfiMppttl�rrr r a�'7 M sl 4lserjrr .roes b..ra �(jvNStAnt LLLTIF7M. r LVA M. MMUMERTY. residing at 5 Pew..ngton Dr., 9untingt6n, ICY 167ti5 MARY GRACE DOUGHERTY. residing at Pox Ave.. Morth6wrt, NY, EVA G. *III=. residing at 126 ztoneclaee Rd., M. Andover, Us"., ... -NOMAS P. 1xN1GNP.RTP, JR.. usiding at Route 4, Trlr.iry Passe'" Pound Ridge. NY and MICNAE'. P. DDUDNERTY, residing at 704 Eaat 65th St., New York. AY as tenants ir. cor..nn. POW If r mms pit T6OMmmwcK ow Rtwr si W Res Pwk is ari6ssne r r Ws Us Ma wlrlr erYsrsd awei6�wpWet re PM"mrwbr g'r ass erwee—do p V d W ssasss Psr,61e Ylr'L i. srilw Ree,49 V sm d pr a.a.w, ALL st■.er:tri/hew w Pr.r of rat w re bns4p.ed bapser.sre arra Wert ' �sY bersr do .. ' w °i 1 r•r:.:f.t r.g ,. dtR zt lg5o DI's IR:N?fR TAI — �ppp w.FD(ClJNL K :t o�q.w Bek 02.00 4Of TVGl7/1R21 wi.1 eW Ode W isaet it aw J da pee,el r��e��f�r�r��})enes Y Ess r uq rrr aM .i' eser Aw-C IN srws amiss R,�sr r h owr bw*.W;YQi=.W&Vwswrr� P4007. HOLD art.pe rr no"d ate pee,r tb sm Rrt r r r w R�6. TO MAVL A71D Tp �1 de • mamma 1Mw ansN6 rs ft For of ie aces pet re 6Ys ar wewa rs saw"al pq pee >rr AND re roe,el r,Sea lwn b,eliewa.a Saul 17l Ye Iw ta.,ew+ru Utl Se e/:-:.a lb.Err prrnre.i•aaiw sr aJ�trr 4 v e�wrae sss wi W re eiaY r ssaiw eeA r14 r\4t IDs.nss6sslr'e CPN ser rr lb piPsw el Arid sa.t.l� el is nest.(de rM'^�e babe wk w pr Ire Yw+s we rf.� ja 11 IMO TU tw b-0--a-d-Nil m4'*NlY.'.tNNew ft somm.6 sti Ybr, w . g`Aepq.tar amp"AN.rly—owi tbdws srAle ssspr Yds�ns ta..i.r40: a ' MA r AL 0.M b40Stu ^y,YYY ��•YYh .r 1Y d.iY.YY1 4,114' YYd.M Y!Nw.b Y M YYA..d�l MniA Y W .Y oYrY/Y IYrMt YwYw.rd M...W W M'•""°�^' f 4.t'.+[raM ..r.n.. r.slid +i+ SAG •Y^ri it�... ' r Y P Y.w r Yr.1t tw'wr M r www r w�.e.YlYYff M + . N 19 n\w...,..Y,bnf 1f YY 41• ..r..M iyv Yn4 M .el.[.11 ...r.. r M N.1'd.[ WithsY.eY H .,. ... •..e.Y,Y T. •wM..w.: 1 .. F^'•"11-• ul+.►L.1s,lw.p .' .l.....n.M M 4^l'ri.w '•w.nn e.••,,.. b tr Y b6.MY1 ...�. ...: d Yd Ywp.0 n.' • nl .YI•.f u.�+ .. ..n .w. ..wwN M bryrr wlwa:{ •.r.M w .r� ^n1..N. rY Mn . . . 1'.f. N ..d .W�•4.t ..IYY. .li, PtltY Y.� Y. ,•Y...: ry ..6• A M YrN d 4rl•.. 1 rM n.p. .MM.M Yr.Y11 V M.M rid.�: ....y.1 Y1,. k�.rl� !Yw.m.M Hr�. .•M\env w ..plied! .YY Y rr� Mfg. ` lt. Y.Mu.1 ..+\�.•.r l.r Yom...a..p..•.1�Tu4 Y,la•.w.l You f0 e s 3 S 1 1 1 iLtRfF��GaG e e uutN b.t. tp.w,ynw a+,. 1 XI/an,�n aanua rW.rknw Mwn NhM.• �.w.aa. _. w onwe r tM at Southold, Town of Southold. County of Suffolk and 1 stat• of He. York, being wore particularly bounded and described as I.,!lows, /[GINNING at a point formed by the intersection of the northerly 11 no or worth Reyes w.Road with the westerly line of the lend of Robert J. McCarthy. which point is also north 77 degrees 27 ntnwtss 60 seconds Nest 226.76 fest as measured along the northerly S- Itne of North SaYwiew Road from the westerly line of North Seymiew r•.d, also known as North Rood to eayeiew and run.Ing thence from veld point of beglnolog westerly along the Northerly line of North ._ hayiw Rood the following courses and distancesr (l) North 11 degrees 27 minutes 10 seconds west 906.19 feetl 121 North 72 degree 06 minutes SO seconds Most 1S2.7S feet to the land of Marry S.humacher; thence worth 16 degrees 66 minutes 60 seconds Last anon the land of Marry Schumacher 1026.71 feet to a wooded marsh; thence W.,rth 16 degrees I1 minutes 40 seconds east along a wooded marsh 291.71 feet to the land of Monte Warrent thence northeasterly and southerly along the lands of Monne Warren, of R. Trautman and of Wilton L. Lpp the following courses and distances, (1) North 66 degrees 32 minutes to seconds test 211.12 fast$ (2) Worth 76 degree 16 minutes SO seconds test 191.60 feet$ (1) North SI degrees 09 minutes 60 seconds Last 107.17 feet$ UI South 72 degrees 10 minute InsecondsSeat 201.11 feet: (S) South 67 degrees 17 minutes 10 <econds east 72.62 feet to the land of Joseph A. Shipulei thence South 21 degrees 22 minutes 10 seconds West along the land of Josep A. Shipule 699.79 feet; thence southeasterly still along the land o ' Inseph R. Shipule and along the land of James and Alicc Gagen the following courses and distances: (1) South 69 degrees 17 minutes 50 seconds East 62.90 feet$ 121 South 12 degrees 19 minutes 50 seconds rest 201.11 feet to the weste,ly line of North Saytew Road also known as North Road to RaYwi<+; thence southerly along said North Paylew Road the following courses and distances, .ill South 21 degrees 22 minutes IO seconds West 10.16 Leet; (2) South 26 minutes n2 minutes 20 seconds test 151.IS feet to the land of Robert J. jy McCarthy; thence South 21 degrees 07 minutes 10 seconds east along the land Of Robert J. McCarthy 677.65 feet to the point or place Of Rt-GtwlNc� _ V e � o a J W. 4C O C 4 p Au.dmwa h C�tC a00 TeTa.m AMIML � ,. Fill 11�1100711�.�6ti t•r ydA.rft! �; tM1.19d .19.11..e s1wm1 AN...N wNNa. .••ldw'+ �"sP `a' TI ♦else• Orin N19 Rill., Neil York 11766. ut`'4dt13 �j Yl r.O s,.et S l•(O d i fad 1•(t•W NIL7N[L KRp{l end RIIOOA ROO,I, b/s�L(N���e.lAl•t + w N Arista Oriw •t ` Nie mill.. Was fort - '11746 1 A T 1 para d i.etW p•^, • • RIp19R�TM,dm ds "a i Ns ps,a,mdtrr-ft d ss&Nr Ide b,i pmy d the rand • Part.6m by M oral..ninr W qww�war i/•n7 of as,mM 1••(4 i hdrs a.."oral W . .rt..d i'rty d ttr..ad Pan A,L d,s main pW,I+n'r patnl d br.L abY i krllsi(.W wpa.sra.im..reta.d,roue. Jill. Iraq W Is{d i a fadhdd.Yr.r of R.9hd6.fu.sy d Rdfdk W feu of Ikr%o.it.trim, .grtleslal♦b..Ad W ib i J a fdlu.; m71mG a .pin I ..d b w hserrat W d ttr rs I,Ii.d N.th Neots Rad viae W - avtery lite d ttr IN d Nbm J.McCarthy.Wim pin "also Nrtb 71 Aepa.17 dtuls W DLsmcr amd.the 776.1%few monad.lore,lh tsrthry lin a Nrtb 6gv1«Wad lrs tie a.serly IDD 1 W a lbnh 9.y,.N...,alm tr..n a N.th b.d to Ngnlm.d lu.,uRPub..fru.a W pin a 901CSIO1 lgimbq tierly aln9t ttr a Wrly Ibr d Nath Rgehv 9sd lle folladm,msas.d di.- (119.10 1n..: (1)Nati.77 A,, 77•roar.+r.md.Nes 90h.1,feet;(1)hath 71 der is ori". 50.eaN.len W.n fen I.tM IW d Very 7w..a9rr;there Nath 16 trpee.M.its," RDT( W r 4 .Ir.r tie IW d Il.rry Str.afer 1 6.7,feet l...m&A sal,: llerae N.lh M @.W deem. 11 to r t.d.lesw .Ina.amid a.h 794.71 for, 1.the Isd a aero.ift.; Ix rM.e mnhw.;ery W vs y.lore the lad.a less,ldtrrm.d L 1".sal of Kdtm L. .117.(yn 79p tl. lot 1.rq sal d;.es.eo: (l)N.th M tl p M.darts.10.ttvW/rt 114.11 (m; (7)North M d-Itrez. 16 nine..•II arn. less 191.60(M; (7)Nath 51 dear..09.i.a W to Ems 107.17 (m; (4)%"IN n&R 10 dr". 10-cords art 101.11 fret; (5)F h 67&•set.. l7.I.".10 stud.G 71.41 fret to the IW of Josh A.AtWlct tta+.e 5adh 71 '•� .epee.u.int.10 ramal.Ilea dart the I"a Jorp A. Lip".095." fart;tl.se r.ah aaery -ill alms nr led aI Jnelh A. R.ipde sal.1 g IM 1s,1 el Jew W al iK toren the fel l.im .T 1`t tlW cora+sal dmw. .: (I) 50t1,M trate.37--i".50.. its 41.90 feel; (1)Seth 47 `w dear..19.i.ten V7 r.vd.Iwt 7(D.I1 few la the wtery I Irs of N "Lew bd 9. !S in North N,.d to bneira;three-"luny 4tr91..W Nath"I-r Nasd lir fdi.igl rues"W !l Nil diasre.: (1)7nah 11 dtyte• 22.,".10 araW Ike 70.76 easel (7)t ,h Jd sn"e.07 it.t.m.lc.d.4a 151.15 fm to ttr IW a Robert J.Nt-mby;thea.,tush n-.ar •.£ ev daft.b.mal.Due alai,t1e IW of More J.1ttorth7 WAS fast to lite pin or play of ltiNmG. IseTOGETHER.wit d ails•tW W tiorrK R sg. e i Pan)d i Yrs Pan R W a"I rleeeY W asel as deFi lit Wore&.A . I.,,, r r aers U..4 ft TOGETHER swh i W+i else W richt.d of any d Ihr int 7rr a W M rib rys�r+:TO HAV AE iv TO HOLD i lnrrr•(•her.w prs.J aro i Iat1 d i rad Pan.i Mn r error W sWi.of the pav of the.rad Pan ba.rr. AND as pear,d as 6rs prn.:r raspli.ae.A c_..,.p 11 d it.lir.1..,krr&1 tswarr Wel i W i Nd part real waiw the d i st this ra.rla•W w 9s eight a RaR rld a•i1- auirrs0.lbN"le"Died Ars br tit parr.40 tit.—aitag' -sad aso1� iase Am"Ill �ra e16e.rt d the NW-a.s Mpe.i.i a7 Parr d d. dthe aft war 7 9lr Pwp-L two..d.d a R b.d}air dear a sar d fhb l a rm,tYa i prpdi6rd peelV6tyast lW4d iM+67sr Nil LLew Slk res'At' 7 O.v N. lwa .iAwr ar. Oqd H .RUN.a r.., /..eir� dMRll lem rr;.r vn i r r law.r Y tie Id.fi.l 4ay i ad.M r r law r M♦e rfdid de vil in ed.b . add i IN bft� tad Was.Mpr dr e W r/.Lft In.. ad tlae.Y g Now la rRad IL ma, mei was. wae. - a -air mma a nwwwom rwvw r wawww..ec e.rw.• w 0.4k dq d " .ad.a w a s. rY d Ra�Y maM Rer.r14 ar r r da.a.M.Lem y Na Yl Nati did 4v—aw Na e+eri d .ils r 6 Iwaa, .Y V re ears r!l. .ra 1 Na"..ft-"MM d,Was L M by Me day da kir e'•'�V dpe rNdd.Y t4 re.aide u Vie. V k la. . OR,wgaain dlriel V.ri4 ea.sN de 6.a araN..l;d.l Re r 4 de i.di.idrl L. de add .i1 aaywrr; da W N .fred dNr0. L MA .L. laa.l.d da &W..E A.l..la; Maw r!was . P.rMw ed;del " R . � W. w .L.rrdur.iva. a paW s r. .dliwd y.Na d MN e L.N'dvar.d.d mrpaa. ..a Made r:ud Mr Ae..id.icer. l .d dr S.dpd i r dela y He rdlr. a d.s 1�eraYid L ra u.i.a llalale. DISTRICT 1000 d.Yllafr iM M.OD .aA J:.DD .rrae No wr YO/007.00D At.NVM.Ydtdl TO MlO RUQI aM 11400L OWN.Ai.vile ..e.ea a.aau m PETER J. MANCUSO Iw..•ar Lr Allar neY •tla /ABv ffCAITY TYTSJ!AM LINK. YYGgeY JJ6 Seven,4 S•reel, S.ile 30 Carden Cit'. L.r Tort f iRI Yd pyYl►03 3Mnll�Y � 14-16-2 (9/95)-7c 617.20 S EO R Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: M Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting A information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that IU A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. •A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Forestbrook at Bayview - Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print orType Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from responsible officer) May 22, 2001 Date PART 1—PROJECT INFORMAPON Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Forestbrook at Bayview LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) 5250 North Bayview Road, Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, New York .. NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Forestbrook Builders Inc. (631 ) 774-5790 ADDRESS 3 Penny Lane CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE St. Tames NY 11780 NAME OF OWNER of different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Mary Grace Dougherty et al. ( 631) 435-8585 ADDRESS c/o Martin Silver, Esq. , 330 Motor Parkway, Suite 201 CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Hauppauge I NY 11788 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivision of 37.771 acres of land on the northerly side of North Bayview Road, Southold, New York (SCTM 111000-079.00-02.00-007.000) into 17 building parcels. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed 8nd undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: OUrban Olndustrial OCommercial OResidential(suburban) Mural(non-farm' fDForest IDAgriculture OOther 2. Total acreage of project area: 37.771 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) —0— acres —0— acres Forested 37.7 acres 28.8 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) —0— acres —0— acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0. 1 acres 0.1 acres Water Surface Area —0— acres —0— acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) —0— acres —0— acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces —0— acres 2.5 acres Other (Indicate type) lawns and landscaping —0— acres 6.4 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Plymouth loamy sand a. Soil drainage: ®Well drained 95 % of site UModerately well drained 3 % of site ®Poorly drained 2 % of site b. If any agricultural land is in.volveo, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY' Land Classification System? NIA acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? OYes ONO a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet) 2 5, Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: K0-10/ /a 010-15% 3 ®15% or greater 2 % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? OYes ®No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Oyes $]No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-32 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes ®No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Oyes UNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? OYes ®No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)- OYes ISINo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes CgNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? OYes ®No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N/A 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name N/A b. Size (In acres) N/A 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? $)Yes ONo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? OYes B)No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? OYes ONo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? OYes 13No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? OYes 13No • 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? OYes ®No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 37.771 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 37.771 acres initially; 37.771 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped —0— acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. if the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing None ; proposed None g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 15 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially —0— —0— —0— —0— Ultimately 17 —0— —0— —0- 1. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 35' height; 40' width; 60' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?1,612 ft. 3 `! 2. How much natural material (ie., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from site? —0— tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Oyes ONo UN/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? N/A b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONo N/A c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONo N/A 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed 4rom site? 8.9 acres. 5 Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes ®No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction —0— months, (including demolition). _ T If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes KlNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10 ; after project is complete —0- 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project —0- 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Oyes ®No If yes, explain 12, is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Oyes EJNo - - - a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount N/A b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? K)Yes ONo Type Sanitary 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes X7No Explain N/A 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes X]No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? MYes ONo a. If yes, what is the amount per month 5.6 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? UYes ONo c. If yes, give name Southold Transfer Station ; location Cutchoeue. New York d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? $]Yes ONo e. If Yes, explain Materials removed from the waste stream for re—use and for recycling- 17. ycling-17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes %)No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? N/A tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? N/A years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes ®No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Oyes K)No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes UNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? MYes ONo If yes , indicate types) LIPA 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 5,100 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes VNo If Yes, explain N/A 4 •� 25. Approvals Required: • Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ®No City, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes ONo Major Subdivision 5/22/01 City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ®No _ City, County Health Department ®Yes ❑No Article 6 — Water Supply Unknown Other Local Agencies Dyes ®No arT sewage disposal ------ Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ®No State Agencies ❑Yes ®No Federal Agencies Dyes INNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? MYes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit Usubdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan pother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? A — C (Agricultural—Conservation) 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Seventeen one—family dwellings 4. -What is the proposed zoning of .the site? N/A S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? )[]Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/ mile radius of proposed action? Residential & Agricultural; A — C and R-40 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/ mile? 1ElYes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land; how many lots are proposed? 17 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 38,006 sq. ft. 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s)for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ElNo 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? GSYes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? K]Yes []No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? []Yes ®No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ❑No N/A D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Spoi or N me Forestbrook Builders Inc. 5/22/01 Signature 77 Date Title Secretary If the action is In a Coastal Area,and you are a state agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 05/17/02 Receipt#: 1038 Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Seqra Review $250.00 Check#: 1038 Total Paid: $250.00 Name: Forestbrook, At Bayview 3 Penny Lane Saint James NY11780 Clerk ID: JOYCEW Intemal ID:54936 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 *,* * RECEIPT Date: 12/12/01 Receipt#: 1025 Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Seqra Review $500.00 Check#: 1025 Total Paid: $500.00 �v 73 �icJ✓i/�o.J���77�C._ /�v�E�c� Name: Forestbrook, Builders Inc 3 Penny Lane Saint James, NY 11780 Clerk ID: LYNDAB Internal ID:42961 �3 GLC 20 Southold Town Punning Board Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 07 �'I01 Receipt#: 0 Subtotal Transaction(s): 1 Application Fees $4,800.00 Check#: 1007 & 1012 Total Paid: $4,800.00 D A-es M F"Amu81w1�oldTown 9 Bowd Name: Forestbrook, At Bayview 3 Penny Lane Saint James NY11780 Clerk ID: JOYCEW Internal ID:36062 Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: C�I Subject: SCTM#: 1000- Date: Comments: f b� � � I0, 6.cL�c_ I ►'� 56� 1 I � C E I d E VC \Y� \ AUG 2 2 2003 D Sod"U Manni Board f � R / I v' `ri OC7-03-2023 05:16 FRON:WIC:KHfI a BRE'SSLER 631 258 8361 TO:631 765 7136 P.001,004 • Law Offices I W1C1<HAM,BRESSLER,GORDON &GBAIVPIC. 13015 Main.Road, P.U. Box 1424 i Mattituck,New Yurk 11952 631-298-$333 ` I Telefax no.631.298-6565 7 10; Fax#:.�l —t/�� From:_1DQ�I �L��� �p�` • —Daae:, Re: 5���-"�" Caxnxnents: -- This is page one of Tld9 transmission contains uiln.'rrrwtion tonfici"tiel endjar L,.gally privileged. Tt is intended.fk'r use Only by the Fm!nm to whom it is directed, lE you have received this AJOLopy in error,please natll,•up by telepho�u immediately so that we can arrange for the rehtm of the do zrtt.ents tolls at na cost m y^u. '.f you do not receive a0.of the pages indicated,pleose call us.on av possible at dw.number 9L�ov2, p [SCE IVE OCT 3 nrq D Southold Town Plannin Board 01:T-03-2003 09:16 PROM:WICk 4NM i. 2RESSLER 63: E38 85E5 rp.8_1 --55 z1_i5 P.4:.02,004 3.4 - } , ac �^ 1 "• l�A� dol•'�43 AALCL. l9m aa 22 _75 � - �r5 res _ EP=_3LEP 63= E99 9565 T0:6=^_ 765 3136 P.0o1'e01 To Mark Tetry and Melissa Spiro Re: Bayview Hurtado From: Gail Wickham 1.0/3;03 Tltc recap 1,11corttputations: Forestbrook Total acres 37,771 Wetlands; Stores; Private ROW (1.725) Net buildable acres 36.046 "5%of net buildable acres 27.0345 (Note this is only 1,28 acres short of actual to meet Conserv. Subd. 75% acreage of 25.7521 preserved) Overlook Total acres 16.04 `Wetlands, Slopes,Pri atc ROW ( 1.383) .12 slope+ 1.263 ROW Net buildab'.e acres 14.657 75% of net buildable acres 10.993 to meet Conserv. Subd, 75% Forestbrook net 27.034 Overlook net 1.0.993 Total Net 38.027 Acres needed to be preserved to get 75% Actual preserved in Forestbrook 25.7521 Actual preserved in Overlook 16^04 Total preserved 41.7921 Forestbrook total acres 37.771 Overlook total acres 1.6.04 Total acres in both parcels 53.811 41.7921 = 77.7%preserved 53.81.1. Forestbrook alone: Acreage preserved 25-7521 = 68.2% Total acreage 37.771 Con'aact price('this steeds to be confirmed with.Melissa) Forestbrook 25.7521 acres preserved said to be sold. 1.725 Wetlands,slopes, ROW to be deducted from price 24.0271 acres X$38,000= $913,030 Overlook 16.04 acres 1.383 wetlands 14,657 acres X$38,000= 556.966 Tot alD E C E W 2 OCT 3 2')03 LSU ,469,996 Southold Town Plannin Beard PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �OgUFFO(,�co BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box 1179 Chairman o � Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Southold, New York 11971-0959 WILLIAM RICHARD J. CREM NO S Vit • Telephone (631) 765-1938 KENNETH L EDWAR DS O Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN H. SIDOR �,�Ol dap! PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Joshua Y. Horton, Supervisor Members of The Town Board From: Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairman Members of The Planning Board Re: Proposed preservation plan and limited development of (SCTM# 1000-79- 5-21.3) and (SCTM# 1000-79-2-7) Date: September 19, 2003 This discussion involves two parcels on the Great Hog Neck Peninsula in Southold; a 16 acre parcel known as Bayview Overlook (1000-79.-5-20.3) and a 37.75 acre parcel known as Forestbrook (1000-79-2-7). As you may recall, the Major Subdivision of Forestbrook proposed 17 lots on 37.71 acres. Through successful negotiation by the Planning Board and Land Preservation Department, the lot yield had been reduced to a 4 lot development with the remaining 28.67 acres proposed for a fee title sale to the Town of Southold. Since, the completion of the negotiations with the owner of Forestbrook for a conservation opportunity subdivision; the owner of the Major Subdivision of Bayview Overlook also came in for pre-concept planning in an attempt to meet the moratorium thresholds. After much discussion, it became apparent that the concept plan could not meet the moratorium thresholds. During the meeting it was learned that the owner of Bayview Overlook, is buying Forestbrook and would like to proceed with previously approved conservation subdivision concept. Upon learning this, it was suggested to relocate the 2 lots from Bayview Overlook to Forestbrook in an attempt to minimize impact to the Bayview Overlook parcel and meet the moratorium thresholds for the land area combined. The concept was presented to the Planning Board and the Land Preservation Committee and was received favorably with the below considerations: 1. This concept would eliminate all lots on Bayview Overlook and relocate 2 lots to Forestbrook. 2. The impact of the additional 2 lots on Forestbrook would be minimal due to the reduction in lot sizes from the previously approved concept plan. 3. The Bayview Overlook parcel is wooded and serves a wildlife corridor from North Hog's Neck to South Hog's Neck including linking an extensive woodland and wetland system. 4. The parcel abuts a preserved parcel to the north (The Shellfisher Preserve) and subdivision open space to the east (Set-Off of John Hurtado) and west (Reydon Court). To the south, across North Bayview Road is the area is vacant and wooded (see attached maps). 5. The Bayview Overlook parcel could serve an integral part of the Hog's Neck trail network and could be used to connect Shellfisher Preserve with Cornell Cooperative Extension Cedar Beach. 6. The Bayview Overlook parcel is wooded whereas, most of the proposed development for Forestbrook is proposed within the "old field" area. The two projects when considered together exceed the moratorium requirement at 76 percent preserved unrestricted land area. However, Local Law 3 of 2002 and subsequent extensions specifically applies to a "parcel'; therefore, the Planning Board would like to solicit Town Board input for the concept as it applies to Local Law No 3 of 2002. Please see the attached exhibits for more information. Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: D SCTM#: 1000- SEP 17 2003 Date: Southold Tows Planni Bond Comments: Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Too-/d/ (f ott7;A'/0() � � � �5 Subject: � �'G 4/ SC9tf/f� 7�+✓ ,S UPJ h i V/S/a A/ /� S /C G C,T S scT�rr#: 1000- 77 r — ;2 c) , /-3 Dale: 91710-3 Comments: C0P/&55 ArZ, -c f(&V 1 ^' � 72003 D PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS O�O' COG • P.O. Box 1179 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS �.fi Ott Fax (631) 765-3136 KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE June 23, 2003 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Anthony Hurtado Forestbrook Builders Inc. 3 Penny Lane St. James,New York 11780 Re: Forestbrook at Bayview SCTM# 1000-79-2-7 Zoning District: A-C Dear Mr. Hurtado: The Planning Board has reviewed the concept plan and has issued the following comments: 1. The 20 x 510 foot long right of way to the out parcel must be removed from the acreage used to calculate the 75 percent preservation criteria. Consequently, the lot sizes must be reduced equivalent to the right of way area. 2. It is the Planning Boards understanding that oversized lots (greater than those permitted in the zoning district) are being requested and the "vegetation retention buffers" are in fact non-disturbed vegetative buffers and will be conditioned as such in perpetuity through the filing of a covenant and restriction. As discussed, the Planning Board requests that on any lot, clearing be restricted to 1 acre. The oversized lots, as proposed, will be permitted only in the event of application of a"limit of clearing" mandate. If you have any further questions please give me a call at(631) 765-1938. Sincerely, Mark Terry Senior Environmental Planner Cc: Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBI0 o�� �,O BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box 1179 Chairman C Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 w Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO 1 Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS KENNETH L.EDWARDS y�JJ�l �a0�' Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN SIDOR,JR. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 20, 2002 Richard Lark,Esq. Lark&Folts Main Road, PO Box 973 Cutchogue,NY 11935 Re: Town of Southold Moratorium Major and Minor Subdivisions Major Subdivision Forestbrook at Bayview SCTM# 1000-79-2-7 Dear Mr. Lark: As you are the agent for the above application please be advised that a Local Law was adopted at the regular meeting of the Southold Town Board on August 13,2002 entitled "Local Law to a Temporary Moratorium on Processing, Review of, and making decisions on applications for Major Subdivisions, Minor Subdivisions and Special Use Permits containing Dwelling Units in the Town of Southold". The Local Law Number 3. 2002 is attached for your perusal. The Local Law states that the Planning Board Office"shall not accept,review continue review, hold hearing or make any decision upon any application for a subdivision,whether that subdivision application was submitted prior to or after the effective date of this law"for a duration of six months beginning August 13,2002. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact my office at 631-765-1938. Sincerely, V1. Bennett Orlows Jr. Chairman Enc. Cc: Josh Horton, Supervisor Town Board Planning Board Greg Yakaboski,Town Attorney Kathleen Murphy, Assistant Town Attorney ARCHEOLOGICAL ITEMS FOUND ON SITE Refer to the cover photograph and corresponding number for identification. 1. Tool for straightening arrow shafts. The hole drilled through the rock slab on an angle allows the arrow to be run back and forth to reprove irregularities- 2.Whetstone for sharpening steel trade items. 3.Trade pipe. Small diameter of stem interior dates pipe. 4. Paint Pot.Porous rock of red color used for facial painting or other decorative painting. Shows use. P' I j� \t It 86F QKc Vii. . � 3 1 do __. --------------- N: y w, r �i June 9, 2002 As an archaeologist, I do believe these artifacts to be of local Indian origin. Included are a whetstone, a possible shaft straightener, a trade pipe (of European origins) as well as a possible paintpot. Paintpots are usually natural formations. Lisa Cordani-Stevenson i G t I I 1 STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY of the FORESTBROOK at BAYVIEW PROPERTY BAYVIEW, TOWN of SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST AND CONTRIBUTORS: David J. Bernstein, Ph.D. Michael J.Lenardi,M.A., R.P.A. Allison J. Manfra The Institute for Long Island Archaeology Department of Anthropology State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook,New York 11794-4364 October 2003 D E 9 D OCT 22003 Southold Town P,� �o Baard ABSTRACT This report presents the results of a Stage 1 archaeological survey for the Forestbrook at Bayview property in the hamlet of Bayview, Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York. The study was performed by the Institute for Long Island Archaeology at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. The purpose of this study is to determine if the proposed subdivision and residential construction on the property will adversely impact historic and/or prehistoric remains. This required archival research and an archaeological survey with subsurface testing. Archival research(including a survey of historic maps and site file searches) suggests that the project area witnessed only limited human activity in the past. This assessment was confirmed by the surface and subsurface archaeological surveys of the parcel. A total of 214 shovel test pits was excavated in the project area. Only three prehistoric artifacts were recovered; a quartzite projectile point fragment and two pieces of quartz debitage. Supplemental testing around these finds did not yield any additional prehistoric material. The three artifacts appear to be isolated finds. Therefore, no additional investigations are recommended to study the prehistoric material on the property. In addition, a very light scatter of mid-nineteenth through mid-twentieth century cultural material was encountered. This Euro-American material probably represents sporadic dumping of household refuse and subsequent dispersal by plowing. As such, it has virtually no potential for contributing to our understanding of past activities in Bayview. Therefore, no further archaeological investigations are recommended. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LIST OF FIGURES, PLATES, AND TABLE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ARCHIVAL RESEARCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 INTRODUCTION AND METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 NATURAL AND CULTURAL HISTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Prehistoric Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Historic Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 FIELD INSPECTION AND SURFACE SURVEY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 SUBSURFACE TESTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 APPENDIX: Excavation and Artifact Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 iii LIST OF FIGURES, PLATES,AND TABLE Figure 1. Map of Long Island showing the location of the project area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Figure 2. 1956 USGS topographic map,Southold, New York, 7.5 minute series, showing the location of the Forestbrook at Bayview property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Figure 3. Archaeological investigation of the Forestbrook at Bayview property inSouthold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Figure 4. 1829 Burr Map of the County of Suffolk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Figure 5. 1843 Mather and Smith Geological Map of Long and Staten Islands . . . . . . . . . 15 Figure 6. 1858 Chace Map of Suffolk County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Figure 7. 1873 Beers Atlas of Long Island . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Figure 8. 1930 Dolph and Steward Atlas of Suffolk County New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Plate 1. Dirt road located at the western edge of the Forestbrook at Bayview property. Note clearing and refuse. View is south . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Plate 2. Field crew members excavating in the northern portion of the project area. Viewis north . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Table 1. Archaeological sites within one mile of the project area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 iv INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a Stage 1 (A and B) archaeological survey undertaken for the Forestbrook at Bayview property in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York (Figures 1 and 2). This study was conducted by the Institute for Long Island Archaeology, Department of Anthropology at the State University of New York at Stony Brook in October 2003. The project area is located north of North Bayview Road and approximately 69 meters (226 feet) west of the North Road to Bayview in the hamlet of Bayview. The entire parcel measures 37.8 acres (15.3 hectares), of which only approximately 12 acres (4.9 hectares) are slated for impact(Figure 3)by subdivision for new residential construction and installation of associated utilities, driveways, and landscaping. The remaining 25.8 acres (10.4 hectares)are scheduled to be preserved as open space (Figure 3), and are therefore not included in this study. The purpose of this study is to determine if new subdivision and construction will adversely impact archaeological remains of prehistoric or historic age. This required archival research and an archaeological survey with subsurface testing. The study was performed in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the Standards for Cultural Resource Investigations and the Curation of Archaeological Collections issued by the New York Archaeological Council (1995). 1 project area 0 o U Figure 1. Map of Long Island showing the location of the project area. 2 8x ¢ \•{P h vti t �.1 a 9`r Foundtn �.r.T r� �. e \ p Park S H P� L ! E g ss T 24 i Park \ Harpers to Cr Southold Soy ey v j s _ Bay 1�- fRa Project ares S O U h s' r Re'id6n ! 0 3hOrms Ile C �,py 22 6 G t4 e 4.1 yY � o eek v �" �`xa "✓�` .l �t .a x Figure 2. 1956 USGS topographic map,Southold, New York, 7.5 minute series, showing the location of the Forestbrook at Bayview property (scale= 1:24,000). 3 N 16'48'40* E _ "' - " •-.: - ;: ,;�.' - / __ - _- - 9r *4x74 r626Z : �'O a •y' enol -- LlI O --------------------- _ ^ ,i' _ - '1�i i ��' � •_�fi_ a _- _ (. �' - _ _ a� \ /• -------------------- d N p20730• vl - _.___-- - h` ' Z X A a o° o _ ' rn N, N ,I Y'' v q y m m0 mOso; Q 00 ----- 3 66 1 9011 100 '1801$ 2-40/1, 30 W30 — �°y a o X940 ----------- 0.. O 0 ® 0 s 21 e. • _ P w 1850 ------- 0 JO) Nom N 0m0. 00,. 0000... -- 0...-0. 0* 0. 00O0 0 Eo p 0...o . 0 00 o E30 — :.000000 iioOO O0-OO ` ow R 0 0 0 O 0....."0 0...., O 0 '6000 0 — _------ ....... E60 — 0 O .0..:0 0 O 0 O O O O 0:- �' -sem 2'10• w� 10.00' -------- 21'22:;6 I 'O O0 0 00 • W00 O : E90 jO- mJFOF0 6oLR99o�o.79`FO'O: O O 0 O F 7` 000 ° O000oo 0E120 .... ..� moM og° O 0 0q.%0 :'® ® 0 Cr m N� '— of, I_ I� !�'•' i F o � CDm3 v 00....0... 000- ® ® 0... 0 ® O0 s � m , w � m i IV/ i l l . ...... ... 21'23'1 j 0,� i I E150 — .....0...Q....O . ..........0 ..0..... 000. .. O 00 .. 000....0....0 0 s 0 15 30 60 120 meters ^ow w formerly ;&r 0 50 100 200 400 feet John D. Hocker _ ' no* or formerly "- Patricia A. Hocker a=A 1 EEi9leenR- HOmlin & A mapping reference Homlin p sterile shovel test pit (STP) 40 STP with prehistoric cultural material ® STP with mid-19th to mid-20th century cultural material Q5 STP with both prehistoric and mid-19th to mid-20th century cultural material Figure 3. Archaeological investigation of the Forestbrook at Bayview property in Southold. 4 ARCHIVAL RESEARCH INTRODUCTION AND METHOD An evaluation of the natural and cultural history of an area is essential to understanding past land use, as well as determining the likelihood of encountering prehistoric or historic archaeological sites. Human groups locate their settlements in order to best take advantage of the characteristics of the natural and social landscape. Thus, knowledge of a region's history and environmental features is crucial in reconstructing past behavior and assessing the probability of locating evidence of early activities. A search of the available published records and site files was undertaken to determine if any previous studies had documented archaeological remains in, or in the vicinity of, the project area. Pertinent historical records such as maps,photographs, and descriptive histories were examined to obtain information on past activities in the study parcel. NATURAL AND CULTURAL HISTORY Environmental Setting. The Forestbrook at Bayview property is located on the south shore of the North Fork of Long Island, on a peninsula (Great Hog Neck)jutting into Little Peconic Bay (Figures 1 and 2). The nearest source of fresh water consists of a small unnamed kettle pond located approximately 305 meters (1000 feet)northwest of the project area. The project area is situated just south of the Harbor Hill moraine, formed over 15,000 years ago during the retreat of the Wisconsinan ice sheet (Sirkin 1995). The topography is gently sloping in the Forestbrook at Bayview parcel, with an average elevation of seven meters (22 feet) above mean sea level. Soils in the project area consist of Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8% slopes (Warner et al. 1975:Sheet 9), a soil type characteristic of moraines and outwash plains throughout Suffolk County. Riverhead sandy loam is composed of deep, well drained, moderately coarse textured sediments with low natural fertility. A typical profile for Riverhead sandy loam where plowing has occurred includes a plow zone (pz or Ap) of medium to dark brown loamy sand to 30 centimeters (12 inches), followed by the B2 subsoil (yellow or orange brown loamy sand,to an 5 average depth of 69 centimeters [27 inches]) and the B3 substratum(light yellow brown loamy sand, to 147 centimeters [58 inches])(Wamer et al. 1975:77-78). No cultural material is expected in the B3 soil horizon. Most of the Forestbrook at Bayview project area is formerly plowed field, now covered with grasses, briar,poison ivy, wild berries, vines, goldenrod, and scattered volunteer pine, oak, cedar, and ailanthus trees (Plates 1 and 2). Disturbances other than plowing consist of a dirt road, as well as isolated clearing, dumping, and soil removal (Plate 1). Narrow strips of disturbed soils are also associated with a metal fence along the eastern edge of the project area, and with the utility pole corridor running along North Bayview Road. Disturbed areas have a low potential for the presence of intact archaeological deposits. In general,the environmental attributes of the Southold area, including the project area, indicate the presence of a diverse set of resources that could be exploited by aboriginal hunter- gatherers, as well as by the later Euro-American settlers. Aquatic resources such as fish and shellfish in addition to marsh plants and migratory waterfowl are present in the marshes fringing the Great Hog Neck peninsula, and upland areas would have supported berries,nuts, tubers, and terrestrial fauna utilized by the Native Americans as part of their generalized subsistence base. 6 Plate 1. Dirt road located at the western edge of the Forestbrook at Bayview property. Note clearing and refuse. View is south. Plate 2. Field crew members excavating in the northern portion of the project area. View is north. 7 Prehistoric Period. A search of archaeological site files at the New York State Museum (NYSM),the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation (OPRHP), Suffolk County Archaeological Association (SCAR, Gonzalez and Rutsch 1979), and the Institute for Long Island Archaeology (ILIA) indicates that there are six known prehistoric sites within one mile(1.6 kilometers) of the Forestbrook at Bayview property (Table 1). The closest known prehistoric sites (NYSM 4884 and 8546)were identified during a state-wide inventory of archaeological sites by former New York State Archaeologist Arthur C. Parker during the early twentieth century (Parker 1920) (Table 1). The Pellicano site (OPRHP A 10310.001285) is located on the opposite side of North Bayview Road and approximately one half mile east from the current project area. The Pellicano site is described as "a small seasonal, Woodland Period base camp" (Cammissa 1996:22), and it contains a relatively low density of artifacts, including quartz flakes (waste products of stone tool manufacture or resharpening), fire- cracked rock, a quartz bifacially-flaked tool, and prehistoric pottery sherds. A similar density and diversity of prehistoric artifacts was encountered at the Cedar Beach County Park and Angel Shores sites (Table 1). The site files also list one other prehistoric site described in Parker's 1920 inventory within one mile of the Forestbrook at Bayview property. Parker site ACP SUFK 40 (NYSM 4909) may actually be located on another Hog Neck on eastern Long Island (on the north side of the South Fork, north of Sag Harbor), and not in the project area vicinity. Based on the results of the site file search and the proximity of favorable environmental features, the Forestbrook at Bayview property has a moderate to high potential for the presence of prehistoric deposits. Expected site types include small scatters of stone tools and flakes that may represent hunting, gathering, or tool repair incidents. Historic Period. There are five reported historic period archaeological sites within one mile (1.6 kilometers) of the Forestbrook at Bayview property, all documented during a single cultural resource survey (Billadello and Johannemann 1988). The historic sites are all associated with map documented structures (no longer standing) south of Main Bay View Drive near the 8 south shore of Great Hog Neck. Artifacts recovered during the 1988 survey consist of late eighteenth through early twentieth century material, including a variety of earthenwares, stoneware,porcelain, a smoking pipe fragment, bottle glass, and building debris (Table 1). Consultation with OPRHP indicates that there are no State or National Register of Historic Places listed or previously determined eligible properties within or immediately adjacent to the project area. Table 1. Archaeological sites within one mile of the project area. Site Identifier Site Name Age/Cultural Comments Affiliation NYSM 4909 ACP SUFK 40 prehistoric "Village site and shell heap on Hog Neck or Hogonock,a little northwest of Sag Harbor. Bone implements and pottery have been found here."(Parker 1920:699). Site may be on the Southj , and not as ma ed in site files. LA10310.000287Beebe-Brown 84 prehistoric "Village opposite shf the bay and near School"(Parker 1929). 46 rehistoric "Traces of occupation" arker 1920). 01285 Pellicano prehistoric Woodland Period sith pottery, debitage, one biface, scraper,and two hammerstones. 00297 Cedar Beach prehistoric Quartz flakes, tools, ire-cracked rock. County Park 00286 Angel Shores prehistoric and Prehistoric artifacts ide pottery,quartz historic flakes,and a quartz talso two unidentified 19`"c. mocumented sites. Artifacts include slip , creamware,earlware,and ironst00284 B. Wells historic 19`"c. site with redwearlware, andbottle lass. 0285 Mills outparcel historic Late 19"c. outbuildinge; 2 nails and outbuildings bottle lass found. 0287 Beebe-Brown historic 19'C. site with brick, nail, window glass, House redware,pearlware, stoneware,whiteware, ironstone, bottle glass, and i e fra ment. A 10310.000288 Brown-Tinsdale historic Early 20' c. site with brick, nails,wood, Homestead window glass, pearlware, ironstone, whiteware, porcelain, and bottle glass. 9 The hamlet of Bayview occupies most of Great Hog Neck in the Town of Southold. Permanent settlement by the English did not occur in eastern Suffolk County until the middle of the seventeenth century. At the time of contact, the North Fork of Long Island was occupied by the Corchaug Indians, speakers of the Mohegan-Pequot-Montauk Algonquian language (Salwen 1978). The lands known to the Indians as Yennecock(present-day Southold, Thompson 1839) were ceded to the Magistrates of New Haven, Connecticut in a series of deeds dating prior to 1640. By the time of European arrival there was little conflict as local Native Americans were already weakened by disease and from raids by the mainland Connecticut tribes. While there was constant fear of attack, there was little actual violence(Bayles 1874:4), and prime land and local power quickly passed to the white settlers. There were no official reservations or settlements for Native Americans on the North Fork after King Phillip's War in 1674. However, records of slave purchases indicate that a number of Native Americans were living in Southold during the late seventeenth century as slaves (Booth 1990; Salwen 1978). There are conflicting reports concerning the original settlement of the Town of Southold because all town records prior to 1651 are lost(Munsell 1882:1). However, it is generally accepted that in 1640 a group of Puritan settlers from New Haven, Connecticut obtained a grant from James Fanet to acquire eight square miles of land. By 1665 the town included all lands from Wading River to Plum Island, bounded by Long Island Sound to the north and the Peconic Bay on the south (Munsell 1882:9-10). Great Hog Neck was divided among 66 owners in 1702, and was probably initially exploited for its extensive salt marshes, though houses were built on the neck in the early eighteenth century (e.g.,the 1711 Horton house). The name "Hog Neck" is probably related to the Colonial period wood-cutting industry in and around Southold, when local forests were harvested for materials to manufacture hogsheads for transporting nun (for an account of early wood-cutting, see Turano 1994:94-98). Three major east-west travel routes were established in the early eighteenth century to connect the small farming communities of Suffolk County. Main Road (New York State Route 25, also known as Old Kings Highway)was cleared for cart use in 1704 (Bailey 1949), and this road continues to serve as the major overland transportation route along the North Fork. 10 Most of the early settlers of Southold were farmers, and any goods produced other than those needed for subsistence were traded to the Connecticut settlements. Clearing lands for agriculture continued throughout the seventeenth and into the eighteenth century. By 1677, the year of the first assessment roll,there were 82 taxpayers within the entire Town of Southold. One of the crops grown was tobacco, which commanded a high price abroad. The shipping industry was established early in the Town's history and by 1690 all vessels were directed to report to New York City to be cleared (Hall 1975). Little changed in the lifeways of the English colonists of Suffolk County until the American Revolution. Early in the conflict Long Island attracted British attention because of the island's proximity to the major port of New York Harbor, and also to Connecticut and Rhode Island. In addition, Long Island was used as a major resource for provisioning British troops, and the local agrarian economy was disrupted as the British stripped the region of food, timber, and herd animals (Luke and Venables 1976). Houses on Great Hog Neck were fired upon by British ships in Peconic Bay during at least one Revolutionary War incident (Booth 1990). Industry and water-borne trade were interrupted with British occupation of the Town of Southold, but life gradually returned to the earlier pattern after 1781. Following the Revolution and into the mid-nineteenth century,the settlement of the North Fork proceeded slowly and was concentrated along main thoroughfares such as Main Road. The railroad reached the North Fork in 1844,when the Long Island Rail Road line between Brooklyn and Greenport was completed. During the 1860s, railroad service was interrupted by financial difficulties and the Civil War, but regular service was resumed in the 1870s. The railroad provided an efficient means of transporting bulk cargoes such as agricultural produce, and thus heralded the demise of coastal trading and wooden shipbuilding in eastern Long Island. New York City-bound trains originating in the Town of Southold were loaded daily with crates and barrels of vegetables during harvest season (Ziel and Foster 1965:167). The railroad also carried a stream of summer visitors to the region. The shoreline communities of eastern Suffolk County flourished with seasonal activity, and hotels and boarding houses were established to meet the needs of summer guests. 11 Despite the influx of summer tourism, Southold remained agriculturally based and relatively isolated throughout the nineteenth century. The farmsteads that lined Main Road produced large quantities of potatoes, cauliflower, brussels sprouts, strawberries, cranberries, dairy products, and eggs. The nature of the local agricultural economy changed in 1980 when the first of a number of vineyards was established. Since then,more vineyards, garden nurseries, orchards, and sod farms have replaced many vegetable farms (Murphy 1990). A survey of early nineteenth through mid-twentieth century maps reveals little activity in the vicinity of the project area. The 1829 Burr Map of the County of Suffolk(Figure 4) shows Great Hog Neck south of the main settlement at Southold. No structures are shown on Great Hog Neck. The 1843 Mather and Smith Geological Map of Long and Staten Islands (Figure 5) clearly illustrates the linear settlement pattern which characterized the Town of Southold from its earliest Euro-American occupation through the late nineteenth century, with houses aligning Main Road (New York State Route 25),northwest of Great Hog Neck. Two structures are illustrated on Great Hog Neck. However, these structures are neither within nor adjacent to the project area. The 1858 Chace Map of Suffolk County (Figure 6)depicts several houses along Main Bay View Drive on the south side of Great Hog Neck, as well as two structures belonging to the Corey family on Bay View Road. No buildings are shown within or adjacent to the project area, west of North Road. By the time of the 1873 Beers Atlas ofLong Island(Figure 7), the railroad was running regularly on the North Fork,more roads had been established, and settlement had increased. Despite a general increase in population,residential development continued to cluster around Main Road in the hamlet of Southold, with hundreds of acres on Great Hog Neck remaining as open farmland. No structures are shown within or adjacent to the project area . The M. Young structure, illustrated to the north, was the closest to the study parcel. The 1896 Hyde Atlas of Long Island shows a similar land use pattern. The project area remained void of structures at the turn of the twentieth century. By 1930, the project area appears to be part of a larger tract of land owned by Ellenwood, as shown on the Dolph and Stewart Atlas of Suffolk County (Figure 9). However, no structures are shown within or adjacent to the project area. 12 Based on the information concerning initial settlement of Great Hog Neck and the historic map overview, the potential for the presence of historic period archaeological sites within the Forestbrook at Bayview property is relatively low. It is possible that the parcel was used for agricultural purposes, but this land use is expected to leave few remains in the archaeological record. 13 z project area - dpi. ' T PECO f t s i .(A.wwnM �f Figure 4. 1829 Burr Map of the County of Suffolk showing the location of the project area on Great Hog Neck in Southold. 14 project area _ n uEitPic I'j , Ioq �• 6 •i--}}-- %.Ze�du � Jlrtn..r.5{ninon •f S r/' L'N 7' / �g C-20 ��0'� 'llay 7 y' Figure 5. 1843 Mather and Smith Geological Map ofLong and Staten Islands. One road and two houses are depicted on Great Hog Neck, which was probably dominated by farm fields during the middle of the nineteenth century. No structures are shown in or adjacent to the project area. 15 o L roleF�. Ova � !! • 1 .. � L :i:. ren y14.1h �,4 ei,:Y,. � 9vxr Y•. r �, t ,fir SM.fan L����ta�NO��,U„� s. . � �- •.�aa,wL,:y, - i ,_ - +# Kir gY� 3 ...: ,projecta ... \ M• d „J4 111 I�l+�il00 F TV fb,�r,no et J xw Figure 6. 1858 Chace Map of Suffolk County depicting a number of houses on Great Hog Neck, most aligning Main Bay View Drive on the south side of the neck. The project area remains void of structures. 16 v^' A ., 1�N• {M •.�'rr d,. u� HgaYnp aYA r. tv a 'u' 4v if _ J 'r jjyrn_ /J Ul t ' l� ,. project aria ^� ., , �'� :. a; )11: ��Yt\ nt. wi�ui nl J3 •� �� ' �` Figure 7. 1873 Beers Atlas of Long Island showing the project area north of North Bayview Road. 17 ZIP.AW G/%Or�VSV S y ' Owthotd roee.e project area ht riJ_fludf A,&a or /smsEivsG E//enweq�' ieW.yToii 'WYd�.S/r ae. R E X T Ferrer Reydon,p/d � 26riswo �/v6 � G N E +ytsn A/.scron Oy Ce O�PGN ��� H-TsrryEre. 1FM///er CL' .1£ 3av Figure 8. 1930 Dolph and Stewart Atlas of Suffolk County showing the project area as part of a larger tract of land owned by Ellenwood. 18 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH A two phase survey design was employed to search for archaeological remains in the Forestbrook at Bayview project area. Similar survey designs,used in other areas of Long Island, have proven successful in detecting prehistoric and historic sites (Bernstein et al. 1999; Lightfoot 1986). The initial phase of the survey involved a surface reconnaissance and inspection intended to locate large and easily visible remains. The second phase entailed subsurface testing. FIELD INSPECTION AND SURFACE SURVEY An initial surface reconnaissance was conducted in October 2003. The entire parcel was walked over, with special attention given to examining exposed soil for artifacts or other surface manifestations of past cultural activity. Vegetation patterns and topographic features which might provide insight into early land use were also noted. Visibility is fair throughout most of the formerly plowed and wooded sections of the project area, and good along dirt roads located throughout the parcel. No cultural material other than recent debris (i.e., less than twenty years old)was encountered during the surface survey. SUBSURFACE TESTING The second phase of the field survey consisted of the excavation of shovel test pits (STPs) designed to detect the presence of cultural remains buried beneath the ground surface. A mapping datum point was established 183 meters (600 feet)from a property marker located at the southeastern corner of the project area, and shovel test pits are identified by metric grid coordinates relative to this point (Figure 3). The entire project area slated for impact was tested utilizing a 15 meter (50 foot) grid (Figure 3). A total of 202 shovel test pits (STPs) was excavated on the standard 15 meter grid. Twelve supplemental test pits were placed one meter in the cardinal directions from test pits that yielded prehistoric artifacts (STPs N60/E165,N75/E180 and N195/E105), bringing the total number of shovel test pits to 214. Shovel test pits have a diameter of approximately 40 19 centimeters(16 inches). All shovel test pits were dug well into the B2 subsoil, typically over 60 centimeters (24 inches)below the present ground surface. The soil from each test unit was screened through a six millimeter(1/4 inch) wire mesh to aid in the identification and recovery of cultural materials. All artifacts,photographs, and field notes generated by this survey are curated at the Institute for Long Island Archaeology, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Results. The specific data recorded in the field for each shovel test pit, including information on soil stratigraphy and cultural material, are presented in the Appendix. The general characteristics of the soils found in the project area are discussed in the Environmental Setting section above. The topsoil layer(referred to in the Appendix as the AO/A1 horizon) consists of partially decomposed organic matter and dark brown sandy or silty loam, and extends to an average of four centimeters(1.6 inches) below the ground surface. Most of the shovel test pits contained a plow zone of light to medium brown silty sand, extending to an average depth of 35 centimeters (13.8 inches). It is underlain by the lower subsoil (132), orange brown silty sand. The B3 substratum (yellow or light brown silty sand) was encountered in 55 shovel test pits, while six test pits exposed soils disturbed by activities other than plowing (Appendix). No prehistoric or historic period features were encountered during the archaeological survey of the Forestbrook at Bayview project area. Prehistoric cultural material was encountered in only three of the 214 shovel test pits. The prehistoric artifacts consist of a single quartzite projectile point fragment (missing only the tip) from N60/E165, and two small quartz flakes (non-cortical waste products from stone tool manufacture and/or resharpening) from N75/E180 and N195/E105. All three of these artifacts were found in the plow zone. The straight stemmed projectile point is similar to the Bare Island or Snook Kill types, both of which date to the later stages of the Archaic Period, 4000 to 700 B.C. Four supplemental shovel test pits were dug in the cardinal directions from the lithic find spots (STPs N60/E165,N75/E180 and N195/E105 ), but no additional prehistoric materials were identified in any of the twelve additional units. The quartzite projectile point most likely represents an isolated incident of loss or discard. 20 A very light scatter of mid-nineteenth to mid-twentieth century Euro-American cultural material was encountered in sixteen shovel test pits. This material includes bottle and flat glass, seven small whiteware sherds,two square cut nails,brick, and coal (Appendix). The Euro- American material probably represents sporadic dumping of household refuse, and subsequent dispersal by plowing. It has virtually no potential for contributing to our understanding of past activities in Bayview. 21 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Archival research and archaeological investigation of the Forestbrook at Bayview property in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, indicate that the project area witnessed only limited discernable human activity in the past. A total of 214 shovel test pits was excavated in the project area. Only three prehistoric artifacts were recovered, a quartzite projectile point and two pieces of quartz debitage(waste products from stone tool manufacture and/or resharpening). Supplemental testing around these finds did not yield any additional prehistoric. In addition, a very light scatter of mid-nineteenth through mid-twentieth century cultural material was encountered. This Euro-American material probably represents sporadic dumping of household refuse and subsequent dispersal by plowing. As such, it has virtually no potential for contributing to our understanding of past activities in Bayview. No further archaeological investigations are recommended. 22 REFERENCES Bailey, Paul 1949 Long Island:A History of Two Great Counties Nassau and Suffolk. Lewis Historical Publications,New York. Bayles, Richard M. 1874 Historical and Descriptive Sketches of Suffolk County. Published by the author, Port Jefferson,New York. Bernstein, David J., Michael J. Lenardi, and Daria Merwin 1999 Stage IB Archaeological Survey of the Kycia Property, Head of the Harbor, Town of Smithtown, Suffolk County,New York. Institute for Long Island Archaeology, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Billadello, Laurie S. and Edward J. Johannemann 1988 Stage I Survey of a Cultural Resources Inventory of the Angel Shores Subdivision, Bayview, Suffolk County. Long Island Archaeological Project, Setauket,New York. Booth, Antonia 1990 A Brief Account of Southold's History. In Southold Town 350th Anniversary, 1640- 1990, edited by Peggy Murphy. 350th Anniversary Executive Committee, Southold,New York. Cammissa, Alfred G. 1996 Phase IB Archaeological Survey and Phase 11 Intensive Testing of the Pellicano Site for the Proposed Bayview Development, Bayview, Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York. Tracker Archaeology Services,North Babylon, New York. Gonzalez, Ellice and Edward Rutsch 1979 Suffolk County Cultural Resource Inventory. Published by the Suffolk County Archaeological Association, Stony Brook,New York. Hall, Warren 1975 Pagans, Puritans, Patriots of Yesterday's Southold. New Suffolk Historical Council, Cutchogue,New York. Lightfoot, Kent 1986 Regional Surveys in the Eastern United States: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Implementing Subsurface Testing Programs. American Antiquity 51:484-504. 23 Luke, M. H. and R. W. Venables 1976 Long Island in the American Revolution. New York State American Revolution Bicentennial Commission, Albany. Munsell, William W. 1882 History of Suffolk County, New York 1683-1882. W. W. Munsell and Company,New York. Murphy, Peggy 1990 Farming: Southold's Ever Changing Heritage. In Southold Town 350th Anniversary, 1640-1990, edited by Peggy Murphy. 350th Anniversary Executive Committee, Southold,New York. Parker, Arthur C. 1920 The Archeological History of New York. New York State Museum Bulletin Numbers 237 and 238. Albany,New York. Salwen, Bert 1978 Indians of Southern New England and Long Island: Early Period. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 15 edited by Bruce G. Trigger. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. Sirkin, Les 1995 Eastern Long Island Geolo8y with Field Trips. The Book and Tackle Shop, Watch Hill, Rhode Island. Thompson, Benjamin F. 1839 A History of Long Island, Containing an Account of the Discovery and Settlement. E. French, New York. Turano, Francis J. 1994 Two Hundred Years of Family Farm Households, 1700-1900: The Archaeology of the Terry-Mulford Site, Orient (Oysterponds),New York. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Warner, J. W. Jr., W. E. Hanna, R. J. Landry, J. P. Wulforst, J. A. Neely, R. L. Holmes and C. E. Rice 1975 Soil Survey of Suffolk County, New York. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. Ziel, Ron and George H. Foster 1965 Steel Rails to the Sunrise. Hawthorne Books,New York. 24 List of Maps Beers,F. W. 1873 Atlas of Long Island, New York. Beers, Comstock, and Cline,New York. Burr, David H. 1829 Map of the County of Suffolk. From An Atlas of the State of New York. Copy on file, Map Library, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Chace, J.jr. 1858 Map of Suffolk County, Long Island, New York. John Douglass, Philadelphia. Dolph and Stewart 1930 Atlas of Suffolk County, New York. Dolph and Stewart,New York. Hyde, E. Belcher 1896 Atlas of Long Island, New York. E. Belcher Hyde, Brooklyn,New York. Mather, W.W. and J. Calvin Smith 1843 Geological Map of Long and Staten Islands with the Environs of New York. In The Natural History of New York by W.W. Mather, Endicott,New York. United States Geological Survey 1956 Southold, New York. 7.5 minute series. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 25 APPENDIX EXCAVATION AND ARTIFACT INVENTORY Basic descriptive data from the project are presented in the following appendix. Excavation, stratigraphic, and artifactual information are included. Excavation information includes shovel test pit(STP)coordinates relative to project datum, level number, stratigraphic designation(stratum), and starting(SD)and ending (ED) depths(in centimeters) for each excavated level. An inventory of the cultural material recovered during the survey of the Forestbrook at Bayview project area is found in the final column. Prehistoric quartz debitage flakes (chipping waste)are categorized based on the amount of cortex remaining on their dorsal face. Tertiary flakes have no cortex remaining. Unless indicated otherwise, all glass and ceramic sherds are undecorated vessel body portions. The following abbreviations are used in the appendix: Stratum Soils AO/A1-topsoil bn-brown bur-buried cl-clay(ey) 132-lower subsoil dk-dark 133-substratum gb-gray brown dist-disturbed gr-gray pz-plow zone gv-gravel lm-loam(y) It-light md-medium mo-mottled ob-orange brown pb-pebbles sd-sand(y) st-silt(y) yb-yellow brown 26 APPENDIX: SHOVEL TEST PIT EXCAVATION AND ARTIFACT INVENTORY STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N240/E45 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 40 pz and bn st sd 40 58 B2 ob st sd 58 68 B3 It bn st sd N240/E60 0 5 AO/AI dk bn sd bn 5 39 pz and bn st sd 39 55 B2 ob st sd 55 64 B3 It bn st sd N240/E75 0 34 dist ob st sd I brick 34 60 B3 It gr sd N240/E90 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd bn 4 27 pz and bn st sd 27 62 B2 ob st sd 62 65 B3 It bn st sd N225/E15 0 60 pz and bn Im st N225/E30 0 6 AO/Al dk bn Im sd 6 44 pz and bn st sd 44 60 B2 ob st sd N225/E45 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 34 pz and bn st sd 34 50 B2 ob st sd 50 63 B3 It bn st sd N225/E60 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 38 pz and bn st sd 38 52 B2 ob st sd 52 64 B3 It bn st sd N225/E75 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 37 pz and bn st sd 37 60 B2 ob st sd 60 69 B3 It bn st sd N225/E90 0 17 dist yb st sd w/pb&gv 17 42 pz and bn st sd 42 66 B2 ob st sd N225/E105 0 5 AO/AI dk bn sd]m 5 36 pz and bn st sd 36 60 B2 ob st sd N225/E120 0 9 AO/Al dk bn sd bn 9 33 pz and bn sd st 33 53 bur pz and gb sd st 53 61 B2 ob st sd 27 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N210/EO 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd lin 4 37 pz and bn st sd 37 64 B2 ob st sd N210/El5 0 3 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 3 32 pz and bn sd st 32 60 B2 ob sd st N210/E30 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 44 pz and bn st sd 44 59 B2 ob st sd 59 65 B3 It bn st sd N210/E45 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd hn 5 40 pz and bn st sd 40 54 B2 ob st sd 54 60 B3 It bn st sd N2 O/E60 0 8 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 8 37 pz and bn st sd 37 52 Bl ob st sd 52 66 B2 It bn st sd N210/1375 0 5 AO/Al dk bn hn sd 5 32 pz and bn st sd 32 60 B2 ob st sd N210/E90 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 5 34 pz and bn sd Im 34 62 B2 ob st sd 62 67 B3 It bn st sd N2101EI05 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 29 pz and bn st sd I painted whiteware 29 53 B2 ob st sd 53 60 B3 It bn st sd N210/E120 0 8 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 8 26 pz and bn sd st 26 53 B2 ob st sd 53 60 B3 It gb st sd N210/E135 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 33 pz and bn st sd 33 60 B2 ob st sd N196/13105 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 3 33 pz and bn st sd 33 60 B2 ob st sd N 195AV I5 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 5 32 pz and bn st sd 32 60 B2 ob st sd N 195/EO 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 34 pz and bn st sd 34 64 B2 ob st sd 28 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N195/EI5 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd bn 3 32 pz and bn sd st 32 60 B2 ob sd st w/pb&gv N195/E30 0 5 AO/AI dk bn sd Irn 5 40 pz and bn st sd 40 52 B2 ob st sd 52 66 B3 It bn st sd N195/E45 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 5 37 pz and bn st sd 37 52 B2 ob st sd 52 65 B3 It bn st sd N195/E60 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 3 33 pz and bn Im st 33 60 B2 ob]m st N195/E75 0 4 AO/AI dk bn Im sd 4 31 pz and bn st sd 31 60 B2 ob st sd N195/E90 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 34 pz and bn st sd 34 63 B2 ob st sd 63 64 B3 It bn st sd N195/EI04 0 3 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 3 33 pz and bn st sd 33 60 B2 ob st sd N195/E105 0 4 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 4 32 pz and bn st sd I quartz tertiary flake 32 60 B2 ob st sd N195/E106 0 7 AO/A1 dk bn sd lm 7 35 pz and bn sd st 35 62 B2 ob st sd N]95/E120 0 10 AO/AI dk bn sd lm 10 41 pz and bn sd st 1 amber bottle glass, 1 brick 41 60 B2 ob st sd N195/E135 0 8 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 8 38 pz and bn sd st 38 61 B2 ob st sd N195/EI50 0 9 AO/A1 dk bn sd lm 9 40 pz and bn st sd 40 62 B2 ob st sd N 194/E 105 0 8 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 8 33 pz and bn sd st 33 60 B2 ob st sd N 180/W 15 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd bn 5 33 pz and bn st sd 33 65 B2 ob st sd 29 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N180/EO 0 5 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 5 33 pz and bn st sd 33 62 B2 ob st sd N180/EI5 0 4 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 4 46 pz and bn lm st 46 60 B2 ob Im st N180/E30 0 4 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 4 24 pz and bn st sd 24 42 B2 ob st sd 42 67 B3 It bn st sd N180/E45 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd hn 5 41 pz and bn st sd 41 58 B2 ob st sd 58 67 B3 It bn st sd N180/E60 0 38 pz and bn Im st 38 60 B2 ob Im st NI80/E75 0 4 AO/A] dk bn Im sd 4 35 pz and bn st sd 35 60 B2 ob st sd N180/E90 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 39 pz and bn st sd 39 61 B2 ob st sd N180/E105 0 3 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 3 32 pz and bn st sd I amber bottle glass 32 60 B2 ob st sd N1801EI20 0 9 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 9 41 pz and bn sd st 1 whiteware, 1 nail 41 61 B2 ob st sd N180/EI35 0 4 AO/A1 dk bn sd lm 4 40 pz and bn st sd 1 whiteware 40 60 B2 ob st sd N180/EI50 0 11 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 11 45 pz and bn st sd 45 60 B2 ob st sd N180/E165 0 4 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 4 36 pz and bn st sd 36 60 B2 ob st sd NI65/W30 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd hn 5 34 pz and bn st sd 1 dark green bottle glass 34 62 B2 ob st sd N165/W15 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 34 pz and bn st sd 34 62 B2 ob st sd 30 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N165/EO 0 4 AO/AI dk bn sd Ln 4 36 pz and bn st sd 36 63 B2 ob st sd N165/E15 0 21 dist and bn st sd 21 54 B2 ob st sd 54 60 B3 It ob st sd w/pb&gv N165/E30 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 40 pz and bn Im st 40 60 B2 ob Im st N165/E45 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 4 38 pz and bn st sd 38 55 B2 ob st sd 55 65 B3 It bn st sd N165/E60 0 3 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 3 37 pz and bn Im st 37 60 B2 ob Im st N165/E75 0 3 AO/Al dk bn hn sd 3 34 pz and bn st sd 34 60 B2 ob st sd N1651E90 0 5 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 5 33 pz and bn st sd 33 56 B2 ob st sd 56 64 B3 It bn st sd N165/El05 0 3 AO/A1 dk bn sd lm 3 34 pz and bn st sd 34 60 B2 ob st sd N165/E120 0 8 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 8 34 pz and bn st sd 34 63 B2 ob st sd N165/E135 0 9 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 9 34 pz and bn sd st 34 60 B2 ob st sd N165/E150 0 8 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 8 34 pz and bn st sd 34 60 B2 ob st sd N165/EI65 0 5 AO/A1 dk bn sd lm 5 33 pz and bn st sd 33 60 B2 ob st sd N165/EI80 0 3 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 3 34 pz and bn st sd 34 60 B2 ob st sd N150/W30 0 33 pz and bn lm sd 33 60 B2 ob lm st N150/W15 0 40 pz and bn lm sd 40 60 B2 ob bn sd 31 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N150/EO 0 32 pz and bn bn sd 32 60 B2 ob Im sd N150/EI5 0 4 AO/AI dkbnlmsd 4 32 pz and bn st sd 32 60 B2 ob st sd N150/E30 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd bn 5 34 pz and bn st sd 34 56 B2 ob st sd 56 60 B3 It bn st sd N150/E45 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd bn 5 38 pz and bn st sd 38 56 B2 ob st sd 56 65 B3 It bn st sd N150/E60 0 2 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 2 40 pz and bn Im st 40 60 B2 ob Im st NJ50fE75 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 3 28 pz and bn st sd 28 60 B2 ob st sd w/pb N150/E90 0 5 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 5 39 pz and bn st sd 39 60 B2 ob st sd N150/E105 0 4 AO/AI dkbnsdbn 4 35 pz and bn st sd 35 60 B2 ob st sd N150/EI20 0 9 AO/Al dk bn sd 1m 9 33 pz and bn st sd 33 61 B2 ob st sd N150/EI35 0 5 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 5 33 pz and bn st sd 33 60 B2 ob st sd N150/E150 0 8 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 8 34 pz and bn st sd 34 61 B2 ob st sd N150/EI65 0 7 AO/AI Abnsdbn 7 32 pz and bn st sd 32 48 B2 ob st sd 48 60 B3 It ob sd N150/E180 0 10 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 10 38 pz and bn st sd 38 60 B2 ob st sd N135/W30 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 31 pz and bn st sd 31 64 B2 ob st sd 32 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N135/W15 0 4 AO/Al dkbnsdhn 4 34 pz and bn st sd 34 63 B2 ob st sd N 135/EO 0 4 AO/AI dk bn sd hn 4 31 pz and bn st sd 31 64 B2 ob st sd N135/EI5 0 3 AO/A1 dkbnsdhn 3 30 pz and bn hn st 30 60 B2 ob hn st N135/E30 0 5 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 5 34 pz and bn st sd 34 53 B2 ob st sd 53 62 B3 It bn st sd N135/E45 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd hn 5 35 pz and bn st sd 35 55 B2 ob st sd 55 66 B3 It bn st sd N135/E60 0 4 AO/AI dk bn sd hn 4 30 pz and bn hn st 30 60 B2 ob Im st N135/E75 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 4 34 pz and bn st sd 34 60 B2 ob st sd N135/E90 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd hn 5 38 pz and bn st sd 38 62 B2 ob st sd N 135/E I05 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 3 34 pz and bn st sd 34 60 B2 ob st sd N1351EI20 0 5 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 5 35 pz and bn sd st I whiteware 35 61 B2 ob st sd N135/E135 0 10 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 10 37 pz and bn sd st I square cut nail 37 61 B2 ob st sd N135/E150 0 9 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 9 40 pz and bn st sd 40 61 B2 ob st sd N135/E I65 0 6 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 6 34 pz and bn sd st 34 60 B2 ob st sd N135/EI80 0 3 AO/A1 dk bn sd hn 3 36 pz and bn st sd 36 60 B2 ob st sd 33 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N120/W30 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd hn 4 36 pz and bn st sd 36 63 B2 ob st sd N120/W15 0 4 AO/Al dkbnsdlm 4 38 pz and bn st sd 38 64 B2 ob st sd N120/EO 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd bn 5 29 pz and bn st sd 29 63 B2 ob st sd N120/E15 0 4 AO/Al dk bn]m sd 4 27 pz and bn st sd 27 51 B2 ob st sd 51 60 B3 yb st sd N120/E30 0 5 AO/A1 dk bn sd]m 5 40 pz and bn st sd 40 54 B2 ob st sd 54 65 B3 It bn st sd N120/E45 0 5 AO/A] dk bn sd lin 5 36 pz and bn st sd 36 55 B2 ob st sd 55 67 B3 It bn st sd N120/E60 0 50 pz and bn]m st 50 60 B2 ob st sd N1201E75 0 6 AO/A1 dk bn Im sd 6 34 pz and bn st sd ] brick, 1 coal 34 60 B2 ob st sd NI20/E90 0 5 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 5 37 pz and bn st sd 37 63 B2 ob st sd N120/E105 0 4 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 4 48 pz and bn sd st 48 60 B2 ob st sd N120/EI20 0 8 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 8 33 pz and bn sd st 1 whiteware 33 60 B2 ob st sd N120/EI35 0 5 AO/A1 dk bn lm sd 5 36 pz and bn st sd I coal 36 60 B2 ob st sd N120/E150 0 8 AO/AI dk bn sd hn 8 30 pz and bn st sd 1 square cut nail 30 60 B2 ob st sd N120/E165 0 3 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 3 32 pz and bn sd st 32 60 B2 ob sd st 34 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N120/E180 0 10 AO/Al A bn sd bn 10 34 pz and bn st sd 34 60 B2 ob st sd N105AV30 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 3 49 pz and bn hn sd 49 60 B2 ob Im sd N105/WI5 0 3 AO/A1 Abn sd Im 3 40 pz and bn Im sd 40 60 B2 ob bn sd N105/EO 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 3 39 pz and bn Im sd 39 60 B2 ob Im sd N105/E15 0 7 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 7 34 pz and bn st sd 34 60 B2 ob st sd N105/E30 0 4 AO/AI dk bn sd lm 4 46 pz and bn Im st 46 60 B2 ob]m st N105/E45 0 5 AO/A1 dk bn sd]m 5 50 pz and bn st sd 50 54 B2 ob st sd 54 69 B3 It bn st sd NI05/E60 0 40 pz and bn Im st 40 51 B2 ob st sd 51 60 B3 mo gr/ob Im st N105/E75 0 3 AO/A1 dk bn lin sd 3 28 pz and bn st sd 28 50 B2 ob st sd 50 60 B3 gr cl sd N105/E90 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 4 34 pz and bn st sd 34 64 B2 ob st sd 64 67 B3 It bn st sd N105/E105 0 2 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 2 29 pz and bn st sd 29 60 B2 ob st sd N105/E120 0 7 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 7 35 pz and bn sd st 35 63 B2 ob st sd N105/E135 0 8 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 8 34 pz and bn sd st 34 60 B2 ob st sd N105/E150 0 4 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 4 36 pz and bn st sd 36 60 B2 ob st sd 35 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N105/E165 0 10 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 10 40 pz and bn st sd 40 64 B2 ob st sd N105/E180 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 35 pz and bn st sd 35 60 B2 ob st sd N90/W15 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 30 pz and bn st sd 30 62 B2 ob st sd N90/EO 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 38 pz and bn st sd 38 66 B2 ob st sd N90/E15 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd hn 3 47 pz and bn Ittt st 47 60 B2 ob]m st N90/E30 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 44 pz and bn st sd 44 59 B2 ob st sd 59 65 B3 It bn st sd N90/E45 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd bn 4 32 pz and bn st sd 32 59 B2 ob st sd 59 64 B3 It bn st sd N90/E60 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 3 50 pz and bn Im st 50 60 B2 ob st sd N75/E75 0 3 AO/AI dk bn Im sd 3 27 pz ob st sd 27 60 B2 mo or/gr st sd N90/E90 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 34 pz and bn st sd 34 50 B2 ob st sd 50 66 B3 yb st sd N90/E105 0 4 AO/AI dk bn Im sd 4 29 pz and bn st sd 29 48 B2 ob st sd 48 60 B3 It bn st sd N90/E120 0 10 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 10 30 pz and bn sd st 30 60 B2 ob st sd N90/E135 0 5 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 5 35 pz and bn st sd 35 60 B2 ob st sd 36 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N90/E150 0 8 AO/Al dk bn sd hn 8 39 pz and bn st sd 39 60 B2 ob st sd N90/E165 0 9 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 9 39 pz and bn st sd 39 51 B2 ob st sd 51 60 B3 It bn st sd N90/EI80 0 3 AO/AI dk bn Im sd 3 22 pz and bn st sd 1 whiteware 22 60 B2 ob st sd N76/E180 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 3 36 pz and bn st sd 36 70 B2 ob st sd N75/W15 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 35 pz and bn st sd 35 64 B2 ob st sd N75/EO 0 3 AO/AI dk bn sd hn 3 42 pz and bn Im sd 42 50 B2 ob hn sd N75/E15 0 6 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 6 60 pz and bn sd st N75/E30 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 5 40 pz and bn st sd 40 60 B2 ob st sd 60 67 B3 It bn st sd N75/E45 0 6 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 6 44 pz and bn st sd 44 57 B2 ob st sd 57 66 B3 It bn st sd N75/E60 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 51 pz and bn hn st 51 60 B2 ob st sd N75/E75 0 4 AO/A1 dk bn lm sd 4 34 pz and bn st sd 34 60 B2 mo ob/gb st sd N75/E90 0 5 AO/A1 dk bn sd lm 5 50 pz and bn st sd 50 62 B2 ob st sd N75/E105 0 5 AO/A 1 dk bn Im sd 5 33 pz and bn st sd I painted whiteware 33 56 B2 dk ob st sd 56 60 B3 It bn st sd 37 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N75/E120 0 7 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 7 30 pz and bn sd st 30 37 B2 ob st sd 37 61 B3 gb st sd N75/E135 0 7 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 7 33 pz and bn sd st 33 60 B2 ob st sd N75/E150 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd bn 3 32 pz and bn st sd 32 60 B2 ob st sd N75/E165 0 9 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 9 35 pz and bn st sd 35 62 B2 ob st sd N75/E179 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 3 36 pz and bn st sd 36 63 B2 ob st sd N75/EI80 0 6 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 6 36 pz and bn st sd 1 quartz tertiary flake, i amber bottle glass, I brick 36 60 B2 ob sd st N75/E181 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 36 pz and bn st sd 36 67 B2 ob st sd N74/E180 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 4 35 pz and bn st sd 35 60 B2 ob st sd N61/E165 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 34 pz and bn st sd 34 60 B2 ob st sd N60/EO 0 5 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 5 32 pz and bn st sd 32 64 B2 ob st sd N60/E15 0 6 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 6 39 pz and bn st sd 39 64 B2 ob st sd N60/E30 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 36 pz and bn st sd 36 63 B2 ob st sd N60/E45 0 5 AO/AI dk bn sd lrn 5 30 pz and bn st sd 30 60 B2 ob st sd 60 65 B3 It bn st sd N60/E60 0 60 pz and bn Im st 38 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N60/E75 0 6 AO/Al dk bn sd hn 6 51 pz and bn sd st 51 60 B2 It bn sd st N60/E90 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 39 pz and bn st sd 39 66 B2 ob st sd N60/E105 0 4 AO/Al dk bn hn sd 4 38 pz and bn st sd 38 60 B2 ob st sd N60/E 120 0 5 AO/AI dk bn sd hn 5 29 pz and bn sd st 29 38 B2 ob st sd 38 61 B3 It bn sd st N60/E135 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 3 34 pz and bn sd st 34 60 B2 ob sd st N60/E150 0 8 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 8 32 pz and bn st sd 32 60 B2 ob st sd N60/E 164 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 3 39 pz and bn st sd 39 50 B2 ob st sd 50 60 B3 gr cl sd N60/E 165 0 9 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 9 37 pz and bn st sd 1 quartzite straight stemmed projectile point(missing tip) 37 53 B2 ob st sd 53 63 B3 It bn st sd N60/E 166 0 8 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 8 34 pz and bn st sd 34 54 B2 ob st sd 54 62 B3 1t bn st sd N60/E 180 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 32 pz and bn st sd 32 60 B2 ob st sd N59/E165 0 9 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 9 38 pz and bn st sd 38 55 B2 ob st sd 55 62 B3 It bn st sd N45/EO 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd hn 4 46 pz and bn Im sd 46 60 B2 ob Im sd N45/E 15 0 2 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 2 30 pz and bn Im sd 30 60 B2 ob Im sd 39 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N45/E30 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 39 pz and bn st sd 39 64 B2 ob st sd N45/E45 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 36 pz and bn st sd 36 55 B2 ob st sd 55 62 B3 It bn st sd N45/E60 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 3 60 pz and bn Im st N45/E75 0 6 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 6 57 pz and bn sd st 57 60 B2 It bn sd st N45/E90 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 5 40 pz and bn st sd 40 60 B2 ob st sd N45/E105 0 6 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 6 37 pz and bn st sd 37 55 B2 ob st sd 55 60 B3 gb cl sd N45/EI20 0 8 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 8 37 pz and bn sd bn 37 62 B2 mo ob/gb st sd N451EI35 0 9 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 9 38 pz and bn st sd 38 60 B2 ob st sd N45/E150 0 3 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 3 32 pz and bn st sd 32 60 B2 ob st sd N45/E165 0 9 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 9 29 pz and bn st sd 29 43 B2 ob st sd 43 62 B3 It bn st sd N45/E]80 0 14 dist mo and bn/dk bn st sd 14 38 pz and bn st sd 38 60 B2 ob st sd N30/EO 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 39 pz and bn st sd 39 66 B2 ob st sd N30/E15 0 2 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 2 40 pz and bn st sd 40 60 B2 ob st sd N30/E30 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 5 38 pz and bn st sd 38 51 B2 ob st sd 51 66 B3 It bn st sd 40 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N30/E45 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 4 44 pz and bn st sd 44 58 B2 ob st sd 58 65 B3 It bn st sd N30/E60 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 4 32 pz and bn st sd 32 63 B2 ob st sd N30/E75 0 7 AO/AI dk bn sd bn 7 56 pz and bn sd st 56 60 B2 It bn sd st N30/E90 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 38 pz and bn st sd 38 64 B2 ob st sd N30/E105 0 7 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 7 34 pz and bn st sd 34 60 B2 ob st sd N30/E120 0 8 AO/AI dk bn sd lm 8 35 pz and bn sd st 35 60 B2 ob st sd N30/E135 0 3 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 3 31 pz and bn st sd 31 60 B2 ob st sd N30/E150 0 8 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 8 37 pz and bn st sd 37 45 B2 ob st sd 45 60 B3 It bn st sd N30/E165 0 8 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 8 37 pz and bn st sd 37 60 B2 It bn st sd N30/E180 0 9 AO/Al dk bn st Im 9 26 dist mo and bn st sd 26 45 pz and bn sd st 45 60 B2 ob st sd N22/E75 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 5 34 pz and bn st sd 34 62 B2 ob st sd N20/E120 0 7 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 7 38 pz and bn sd st 38 60 B2 ob sd st N15/EO 0 3 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 3 47 pz and bn st sd 47 60 B2 ob st sd N 15/E 15 0 4 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 4 40 pz and bn sd Im 40 60 B2 ob Im sd 41 STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material N15/E30 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 5 37 pz and bn st sd 37 65 B2 ob st sd N15/E45 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd Im 5 45 pz and bn st sd 45 62 B2 ob st sd 62 69 B3 It bn st sd N15/E55 0 5 AO/Al dk bn sd lm 5 28 dist mo and bn st sd 28 40 pz and bn st sd 40 70 B2 ob st sd N15/E90 _ 0 3 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 3 47 pz and bn Im sd 47 60 B2 ob Im sd N15/EI05 0 7 AO/A1 dk bn sd Im 7 32 pz and bn st sd 32 60 B2 ob st sd N15/EI35 0 9 AO/AI dk bn sd lm 9 33 pz and bn st sd 33 49 B2 ob st sd 49 60 B3 It bn st sd N15fE150 0 3 AO/A1 dkbnsdIm 3 32 pz and bn st sd 32 50 B2 ob st sd 50 60 B3 gr cl sd N15/EI65 0 9 AO/AI dk bn sd Im 9 38 pz and bn sd st 38 43 B2 ob st sd 43 60 B3 It bn st sd N151E180 0 5 AO/A1 dkbnsdlm 5 35 pz and bn sd st I aqua flat glass 35 60 B2 ob sd st 42 PLANNING BOARD MEMBE• O�gUFFO(/(coG IIENNETT ORP.O. Box 1179l,0%VSRI,,M, 'J� Chairman p :c Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J.CREMERS N Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDS Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Section 617.8 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 15th day of August, 2002 on the question of the following: 3:00 P.M. Scoping Session for the preparation of a Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the Hog Neck Peninsula. The geographic boundaries of the study encompass all waterbodies and lands located to the south and east of Goose Creek and Elizabeth Lane and east of Corey Creek in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. 4:00 P.M. Scoping Session for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed minor subdivision of John & Rose Milazzo. The property is located on Pipes Creek & bordered on the north by the LIRR track in Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-53-1-9 Draft Scopes are available on the Town of Southold's Web Site (www.northfork.net/southold) and the Planning Board Office. Dated: 8/5/02 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLEASE PRINT ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 8, 2002 AND AUGUST 15, 2002 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU COPIES SENT TO: Suffolk Times FROM SaITNOLD TOWN PLFA INri BOARD FAX NO. 631 765 3136 Aug. 05 2H02 10:40AM PI P.O. Box 117 53095 Route i Soutlldd. NY 1971 Phone: (031) 351938 , Fax: (631)76 3136 E-Mail: plann: j@s.outhold.org FaK To: The Si olk.'rimae From Valerie Scopa;ricard Parc Pagan: 2 Pianc — notee 8!5102 ---.--, RM Legal ;for 8/8102&8115102 cc: Editior urgent r Review Pleee.Comment Please R4piy ds requested Please print t ,foll9wing legal ads in the 8/8102 &88/02 editions.Thanks. Scoping Sew ns, 3:00 p.m. K a Nock Area 4:00 p.m. Mi zzo Minor Subdivision WxWly ackni rledge receipt by signing below and faxing cover latter back. Received by Bete: Z0 3Jtld Mffi.�32iS3WI_ L8Lc 6F.::Tf9 69:DT ',P0?19G;90 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SpfF011rc BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. h`Z� OGy P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J. CREMERS N 2 Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS O Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGERICHARD CA GIANO Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Section 617.8 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 15th day of August, 2002 on the question of the following: 3:00 P.M. Scoping Session for the preparation of a Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the Hog Neck Peninsula. The geographic boundaries of the study encompass all waterbodies and lands located to the south and east of Goose Creek and Elizabeth Lane and east of Corey Creek in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. 4:00 P.M. Scoping Session for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed minor subdivision of John & Rose Milazzo. The property is located on Pipes Creek & bordered on the north by the LIRR track in Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-53-1-9 Draft Scopes are available on the Town of Southold's Web Site (www.northfork.net/southold) and the Planning Board Office. Dated: 8/5/02 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 6th day of August, 2002 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold New York 8/15/02 Scoping Sessions: 3:00 p.m. Scoping Session for the Hogs Neck Area, Southold 4:00 p.m. Scoping Session for the proposed Minor Subdivision of John & Rose Milazzo SCTM#1000-53-1-9 Carol Kahn Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this day of 0---?. , 2002. otary Public JOYCE M.WILKINS N .4State ffof Now York No952246, k county Term Expires June 12, aoO3 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �pSUFFO(,�c BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. h`t`� OG%, P.O. Box 1179 Chairman :G Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J.CREMERSW T Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDS O Telephone (631) 765-1938 Qi}(jR6E$I'PB�FFE-LA 1'tE^dof,-3it 1'�0 ���`' Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO I MARTIN SIDOR, JR. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Coordinating Agencies From: The Planning Board Date: August 5, 2002 Re: Hog's Neck Peninsula Generic Environmental Impact Statement Please find the attached passed resolution and draft scope for the above referenced project for your perusal and comment. A scoping session is set for August 15, 2002 at 3:00 pm at the Southold Town Hall Meeting Room, 53095 Main Road, Southold. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call our staff at (631)-765-1938. Enc. Cc: Joshua T. Horton, Supervisor Town of Southold Town Board Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney Town of Southold Board of Trustees Scott Hilary, Southold Conservation Advisory Committee Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator Jamie Richter, Town Engineer Pete Hams, Highway Superintendent Suffolk County Department of Hcalth Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Water Authority New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,Albany Marian Sumner,Applicant Agent Charles Cuddy, Esq.,Applicant Agent Patricia Moore, Esq. Applicant Agent Richard Lark, Esq. Applicant Agent Cathy Mesiano,Applicant Agent Betsey Dickerson, Applicant Chic Voorhis, Nelson,Pope & Voorhis, LLC To: Town Board of the Town of Southold From: The Town of Southold Planning Board Date: June 25, 2002 Re: HOG NECK PENINSULA SEQRA COORDINATION, INTENT TO ASSUME LEAD AGENCY INTENT TO REQUIRE A GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT The following resolutions were passed during the June 24, 2002 Special Meeting. WHEREAS, the Town of Southold Planning Board has received a large number of subdivision applications on the Hog Neck Peninsula within recent months, and these applications are simultaneously pending review and decision by the Planning Board, and WHEREAS, these projects are interrelated to the extent that one project on its own may not overtax environmental resources; however, the combined effect of development may result in adverse environmental impacts, thus indicating the potential for cumulative impacts, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board recognizes that while there is zoning as a guiding land use development control, that the combination of subdivisions currently proposed, and the potential for further subdivision pursuant to current zoning, may in fact exceed the resource carrying capacity of the peninsula due to it's unique geographic, environmental and planning considerations, and as a result may result in significant adverse environmental impacts, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is familiar with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and the Board's responsibilities as the stewards of land use under the Zoning Code to consider the environmental consequences of land use decision making, and further that SEQRA Part 617.10 indicates that a generic EIS may be used to assess the environmental impacts of: Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Rcsolution (1) a number of separate actions in a given geographic area which, if considered singly, may have minor impacts, but if considered together may have significant impacts; or (2) a sequence of actions, contemplated by a single agency or individual; or (3) separate actions having generic or common impacts; or (4) an entire program or plan having wide application or restricting the range of future alternative policies or projects, including new or significant changes to existing land use plans, development plans, zoning regulations or agency comprehensive management plans the Planning Board finds that many if not all of these criteria exist with respect to Hog Neck, and WHEREAS, more specifically, the Planning Board finds that, the pending applications represent consideration of a number of separate actions in a limited resource area; that the approval of these actions represents a sequence of actions which may have a significant impact; that these separate actions have generic or common impacts; and that the approval of piecemeal subdivision of land on the Hog Neck peninsula may foreclose the possibility of alternative conservation land use, coordination of resource protection, and may in fact cumulatively overtax the environmental resources associated with Hog Neck, and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold has a Master Plan and a series of studies, planning initiatives and a record of decisions which establish the Comprehensive Plan of the Town; specific studies which establish the planning framework of the Town of Southold are identified below: • Land Use and Groundwater Quality in the Pine Barrens of Southampton (Cornell, 1983) • Southold Demonstration Project (Cornell, 1983) • Town Master Plan Update (1985) • Long Island Comprehensive Special Groundwater Protection Area Plan (1992) • Southold Town Stewardship Task Force Study (1994) • Agricultural and Farmland Protection Plan (1996) • Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program (1999) • Town of Southold Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (1999) • County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study (1999) • Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy (1999) • Town Water Supply Management&Watershed Protection Strategy (2000) • Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (2001) the Planning Board is aware of these studies, and coupled with the zoning map and Zoning Code of the Town of Southold, seeks to maintain orderly development within the purview of the Board's functions, and 2 Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Resolution WHEREAS, the Planning Board is aware of an overriding set of goals and desires represented by four (4) themes which are embodied in land use documents and regulations and the Comprehensive Plan of the Town, specifically noted as follows: (1) The preservation of farmland and agriculture, (2) The preservation of open and recreational space, (3) The preservation of the rural, cultural, commercial and historical character of the hamlets and surrounding communities, and (4) The preservation of the natural environment. the Planning Board finds that responsible land use decision making must consider these themes, and WHEREAS, the potential for simultaneous development of the current pending applications, and the potential for further development of vacant lands on the Hog Neck peninsula, poses a significant adverse environmental effect upon the resources of Hog Neck, and further may result in a conflict with the four (4) themes that establish the goals and desires of the Town of Southold in terms of the Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, the Hog Neck Peninsula is a unique land mass comprised of approximately 2 '/2 square miles, that has limited resources, and is independent in many ways from the main body of Southold Town, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck has only two points of access resulting in concern over emergency access as well as the general capacity of the roads to sustain combined development pressure of the pending projects as well as further development of other vacant lands, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is surrounded by water and constrained with respect to access, and as a result, emergency service response, evacuation, flood zone management, and other service and community protection aspects associated with extensive development of Hog Neck warrant consideration, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is adjacent to the Peconic Estuary Reserve, and land use and development must be carefully considered with respect to potential impacts on the Peconic Estuary, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is surrounded by tidal waters and tidal wetlands, and has a number of interior tidal creeks including Goose Creek, Corey Creek and Cedar Beach Creek, comprising vast areas of marine waters and tidal marsh/wetlands, which are productive ecological resources with significant environmental benefit in terms of habitat, food production, stormwater and flood control, with the 3 0 Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Resolution recognition that these resources and adjacent protective buffers should be protected, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck includes as many as twelve (12) interior State designated freshwater wetland systems (which are grouped and comprised of more than one feature in many cases), and that these systems provide habitat, water resource benefit, and potential inter-linkages in terms of species migration and support, with recognition that stresses to these resources could result in adverse environmental impacts, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is an independent groundwater reservoir, which is subject to salt water intrusion, encroachment of the salt water interface, and depletion for water supply, as well as impact from groundwater discharge, which may result from over-intensified development, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck, due to freshwater and tidal wetlands, as well as open space and upland habitats, is a haven for wildlife resources which depend on the natural environment and expanses of natural resources associated with the peninsula, and that intensified use may result in impacts to these ecological resources, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck includes rural, open space, agricultural and natural resource qualities, as well as cultural resources; these are resources which are embraced by the Town under the Comprehensive Plan and further are resources which may be adversely affected by over-intensification of development, and WHEREAS, as a result of the traffic, water resource, ecological, open space and cultural resources associated with the overall peninsula, and the potential impacts thereto, the Planning Board finds that consideration of individual projects without interrelated review would be contrary to SEQRA, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold in view of the information available with respect to the Hog Neck peninsula, and the pending projects as well as developable land, finds it would be irresponsible to review the current applications in a piecemeal fashion, and that this would essentially result in a segmented review of a series of actions that are expected to result in cumulative and generic impacts, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has conducted a coordinated review with involved agencies of individual actions including both Type I and Unlisted actions, and has assumed lead agency as a result of their role in the review and approval of subdivision applications, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has authority to use planned residential development (cluster) provisions with respect to protection of sensitive environmental resources, and further routinely uses conservation subdivision, purchase of 4 Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Resolution development rights, and other land use, environmental and zoning techniques to analyze, mitigate and reduce impacts consistent with the Town Comprehensive Plan and in compliance with SEQRA, and WHEREAS, such techniques are available with respect to Hog Neck; however, piecemeal review of applications does not allow for the effective use of such techniques to adequately protect sensitive environmental resources. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Southold Planning Board hereby issues this resolution as a mechanism for coordinated review with involved agencies with respect to the combined actions and resultant development pressure on the Hog Neck peninsula, and that this resolution and the background set forth shall be used in lieu of an Environmental Assessment Form given the detailed account of the environmental sensitivity of Hog Neck identified herein, the geographic area involved and the multitude of pending applications, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the Planning Board, after a period of thirty (30) days intends to assume lead agency status with respect to pending subdivision review of applications, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board finds that a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) is appropriate and intends to issue the appropriate determination to require such document for the Hog Neck peninsula, considering the current pending applications which are expected to result in cumulative and generic impacts, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board authorizes the secretary to the Board to file this notice with the following parties: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Riverhead Town Board of the Town of Southold Town of Southold Trustees Ms. Betsey Dickerson, Applicant Patricia Moore, Esq., Applicant Agent Abigail Wickham, Esq., Applicant Agent Richard Lark, Esq., Applicant Agent Cathy Mesiano, Expeditor, Applicant Agent 5 Hogs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic EIS Town of Southold DRAFT GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT HOGS NECK PENINSULA A) DRAFT GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (GEIS) This study will be consistent with SEQRA guidance for a GEIS, and will include the entire Hogs Neck Peninsula. The study will utilize GIS wherever possible. Shape files will be obtained from the Town of Southold under a sub-license agreement with the Town and County, for use in evaluating and mapping environmental resources,planning and zoning data, and build-out analysis. An analysis of vacant subdividable lands will be conducted as a basis for impact analysis. The build-out analysis will be used to determine demographic, fiscal, groundwater, trip generation, and other density- derived changes in the current environment which would be anticipated. Assumptions will be made regarding natural areas and open space, fertilized areas, other landscaping, and general site development. A full groundwater impact analysis will be prepared, and the peninsula will be modeled for nitrogen load and water budget. Water quality data will be obtained and discussed with SCDHS, and water availability will be assessed in terms of yield and population. Tidal and freshwater wetlands will be mapped and a full ecological impact analysis will be prepared. Flood prone areas will be mapped and access considered. A traffic impact analysis will be conducted based on the build-out scenario. Ideally, four (4) Automatic Traffic Recorders (ATR) would be installed to monitor trips and key locations before, during and after the Memorial Day Weekend. Four (4) key intersections would also be studied, and access constraints, congestion, level of service and traffic mitigation findings documented. Other environmental resources and potential impacts will be analyzed based on the SEQRA outline included below. Mitigation measures, potential open space acquisitions, linkages, constraints and limitations, development standards, etc. will be documented to assist in ensuring that the carrying capacity of the peninsula is not exceeded. The consultant will work closely with the Town to coordinate efforts and will meet with Planning Staff to discuss results and mitigation. The following outline provides a further framework for the DGEIS. 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 1.1 Project Purpose, Need and Benefits 1.1.1 Background and History 1.1.2 Public Need and Municipality Objectives 1.1.3 Benefits of the Project 1.2. Location Geographic boundaries Districts or Lands Affected Establish study area and specific parcels for which detailed information is available Page I of 5 Hogs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic EIS 1.3 Project Description Describe any site specific conceptual proposals that the Town is aware of, as well as study area land use recommendations as hypothetical land use proposals, to form a basis for impact analysis relating to a proposed project. Describe in detail the current zoning, pending projects, comprehensive plan and management strategies, and determine a build- out density based on current zoning for project evaluation. 1.4 Schedule, Construction, Operation Provide any pertinent insight into the schedule for implementation of the land use initiatives, as well as the schedule for construction and operation of any known land use projects on site specific parcels. 1.5 Approvals Describe any approvals necessary to implement the proposed land use initiatives of the study, as well as subsequent agency decisions which would be needed for any known specific land use projects. 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 2.1 Geology - Provide a description of the study area geologic environment. Describe the importance of the resource and the protection of same. Obtain information from the Suffolk County Soil Survey and regional mapping. 2.1.1 Surface Soils -Suffolk County Soil Survey soil associations 2.1.2 Topography—describe based on USGS or regional mapping resources, as well as site specific information as available. Provide slope analysis of study area utilizing digital elevation models. 2.2 Water Resources-Provide a characterization of the water resource environment in Hogs ?geek. Describe the importance of the resource and the protection of same. Obtain information from SCDHS, Town GIS, 208 Study, Comprehensive Plan, etc. 2.2.1 Groundwater — recharge areas, watersheds, general water quality, water supply; depth to groundwater, direction of groundwater flow, etc. 22.2 Surface Water and Drainage — significant surface water features and drainage characteristics. 2.3 Ecological Resources - Provide a characterization of the ecological environment of the study area. Describe the importance of the resource and the protection of same. Obtain information from Town GEIS's, Open Space and Natural Resource Inventories as well as site specific field inventories, aerial photography and site habitat mapping. 2.3.1 Vegetation—describe habitats on undeveloped parcels of study area. 2.3.2 Wildlife—describe unique species (threatened, endangered, special concern)and abundance of common species in habitats of affected lands. 2.3.3 Unique Habitats, Species, etc. — consult Town/State wetlands maps to identify wetlands on or in proximity to the site; contact NYS Natural Heritage Program for any unique habitats, floral or fauna species. Evaluate any species' biological needs and suitability of site to accommodate species. 2.4 Transportation—describe major highways, access to lands, local roads and overview of infrastructure. Summarize Traffic Impact Study(see separate scope). 2.5 Land Use and Zoning 2.5.1 Land Use — describe and map existing land use patterns in the study area. Use aerial photographs to document surrounding land use categories as well as surrounding area; establish land use categories and use Town GIS. 2.5.2 Zoning — describe and map existing zoning of lands in study area using Town GIS. Page 2 of 5 0 Hogs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic FIS 2.5.3 Special Districts—describe and map special districts, if any. 2.5.4 Land Use Plans - Review available land use plans including Existing Town Zoning, Special Districts, and relevant regional land use plans and regulations including the 208 Study,and Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. 2.6 Community Services - discuss and map school districts, and discuss other community services and infrastructure within the study area, including police, fire, solid waste, and utilities. 2.7 Cultural Resources 2.7.1 Visual Resources — discuss visual resources of study area, existing site character and open space. 2.7.2 Cultural Resources — Describe Cultural Resources Assessment (CRA) including archival search, historic maps, walkover and documentation of potential historic and archaeological site sensitivity. Summarize Stage IA Cultural Resources Assessment(see separate scope). 2.7.3 Noise Resources — describe noise sources within study area; identify sensitive receptors adjacent the study area. 2.8 Growth-Inducing Aspects 3.0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - Impacts of each resource area noted above will be discussed and analyzed in detail; impacts will be discussed as long term/short term, site specific or cumulative where appropriate. 3.1 Geological Resources 3.2 Water Resources 3.3 Ecological Resources 3.4 Transportation 3.5 Land Use, Zoning and Plans 3.6 Community Services 3.7 Cultural Resources 3.8 Growth-Inducing Aspects 3.9 Cumulative Impacts 4.0 MITIGA'rION MEASURES 4.1 Geology 4.2 Water Resources 4.3 Ecological Resources 4.4 Transportation 4.5 Land Use and Zoning 4.6 Community Services 4.7 Cultural Resources 4.8 Socio-Economic 4.9 Cumulative Impacts 4.10 Growth-Inducing Aspects 5.0 ADVERSE IMPACTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED 6.0 ALTERNATIVES 6.1 No Action Alternative 6.2 Full Development under Current Zoning 6.3 Reduced Density Development Page 3 of 5 ` . Hogs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic EIS EIS EXCLUSIONS 1. Fees are for professional services only and do not include direct costs(non-xpeeted); 2. Engineering,surveying or other services not specified herein; 3. Duplication of document for submission(1 client copy included per submission); 4_ Direct cost of site soil borings,sampling,water/soil/sediment analysis or other testing, if required(not expected); 5. Public hearings and meetings; public presentation materials (if required); revisions to EIS caused by requests for additional work during comment periods, will be billed based on time rates; all meetings, attendance at hearings and/orwork not specifically mentioned herein will be billed at on an hourly rate basis in accordance with the time rates fee schedule. B) TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 1. Conduct seven day automatic direction traffic counts at the following locations: a) Bayview Road(main) south of Smith Drive South b) Bayview Road(North Road)North of Goose Creek Lane 2. Calculate the vehicles trip generation rate for the existing residences on Great Hog Neck using the automatic traffic counts and Town data bases to determine the appropriate number of residences. Estimate the number of single family residences, which can be constructed on the undeveloped land on Great Hog Neck. 3. Compare the prevailing trip generation to the Institute of transportation Engineers Data. The higher value the data developed for the prevailing trip generation or the ITE data will be used to project potential traffic increases. 4. Conduct morning (7-9am) evening (4-6pm) and Saturday midday (Ilam-2pm) intersection turning movement counts at the following intersections: a) Route 25 Main Road and Corwin Lane. b) Route 25, Main Road, and Ackerly Pond Road. C) Route 25,Main Road and Oaklawn Avenue d) Route 25, Main Road and Horton Lane. 5. Calculate the growth of the existing traffic using New York State or Suffolk County growth factors. 6. Compare the existing road future traffic capacity and Levels of Service at the intersections listed above. 'The future conditions to be evaluated are: a) Complete development per existing zoning by 2012 b) Reduced development density as approved by the Town of Southold by 2012 7. Review the emergency service access with the appropriate officials for the existing and full development and reduced density conditions. 8. Inventory the existing Bayview Road intersections to determine sight distance restrictions. 9. Collect existing traffic volume data from the Suffolk County Department of Public Works and the New York State Department of Transportation. 10. Compile and evaluate the data collected into the GEIS for the existing, full development and reduced density conditions. Page 4 of 5 [logs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic EIS C) CULTURAL. RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Retain the services of a qualified archaeological services consultant to perform a Stage IA study for the peninsula. The Stage IA (Documentary Search and Sensitivity Assessment Study) report will consist of documentary search and visual inspection study prepared according to NY Archaeological Council guidelines. The report will be accompanied by recommendations regarding the need for further study if applicable. D) DRAFT EIS FOLLOW-UP AND FINAL EIS PREPARATION The DEIS may require finalization, and/or revision subsequent to Planning Board/staff input. The FEIS phase is most difficult to anticipate as the FEIS depends upon the written and oral comments received by Town at hearings and during the comment period. A budget is typically estimated based on experience with prior similar projects; however, depending upon agency/public input, the budget could be more or less. The following services are anticipated: 1. Attend meetings related to Draft and Final EIS. 2. Revise Draft EIS per comments from lead agency(s). 3. Attend Public Hearing on Draft EIS. 4. Prepare Response to Comments on Draft EIS and submit as Final EIS. 5. Revise Final EIS for acceptance by lead agency. Page 5 of 5 PPS Mr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Chairman of the Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York Dear Mr. Orlowski: It has come to my attention that the Southold Town Planning Board will be reviewing an application for a major subdivision in the North Bayview area called Omwv*niat Bayview,by Zoumas Contracting Corp. I know the proposed subdivision is for 17 homes to be built on 38 acres in an area of meadow and woodland bordered by North Bayview Road and North Bayview Extension. In addition, I know there is a second proposed major subdivision, also by Zoumas Contracting Corp which is for 22 homes to be built on 48 acres. This is located West of Brigantine Drive near the area called Harbor Lights Estates. My brother and I own a home in Goose Bay Estates which our parents bought over twenty five years ago. My father and I used to take our daily walk on Bayview Avenue right in this area. Truly, there is abundant wildlife in the area that would be destroyed by these new homes. Only last week my brother,Dr. Peter Ortner, and I took this walk and saw a red fox, a buck,a doe, and two lovely fawn just bom. In addition, there are numerous birds who nest in the marsh. Southold is a quiet town and that it why the residents cherish it so deeply. I am totally against the two proposed subdivisions as it is quite obvious it will destroy the few remaining parcels of land that make the area safe for animals as well as people. In addition, the homes would place a burden on the road system as well as the school system and sewerage. Please let me know if there is anything else I can write to help. Thank you. Sincerely, �V1 d r�44�/ Professor Toni Ortner AUG 0 52002 SoutholdTown Planning Boerd i dvu � Submission Il'Llhoul a Cover Letter Sen-der: G h C� h C�- // Subject: SCTAI#: 1000- Date. ✓ cti l C Z Z f ZO U Z Comments: Cj i eS� �b'vV� `� { �lOd ^1 �I n Cil J JUL 2 1002 Southold Town p "" „ f AL 1^6 2002 " b f IA3,?1-74,Le� arm✓ . w �ivahea Qe ,LD '`�IUiP/EC �lC��/N�� ✓ vwv �e J o tJ7"P ), PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o��S�FFO(,�-c0 • BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box 1179 Chairman 6 Town Hall, 53096 State Route 25 WILLIAM J. CREMERS y Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDS O .F Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO MARTIN SIDOR, JR. T PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Town Board of the Town of Southold From: The Town of Southold Planning Board Date: July 9, 2002 Re: HOG NECK PENINSULA SEQRA COORDINATION, SETTING OF SCOPING SESSION The following resolutions were passed during the July 8, 2002 meeting: WHEREAS, that the Planning Board finds that a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) is appropriate and intends to issue the appropriate determination to require such document for the Hog Neck peninsula, considering the current pending applications which are expected to result in cumulative and generic impacts, therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Board set Thursday, August 15, 2002 at 3:00 p.m. to conduct the Scoping Session for the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the Hog's Neck Peninsula at the Town of Southold Town Hall. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board authorizes the secretary to the Board to file this notice with the following parties: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Riverhead Town of Southold Trustees Ms. Betsey Dickerson, Applicant Patricia Moore, Esq., Applicant Agent Abigail Wickham, Esq., Applicant Agent Richard Lark, Esq., Applicant Agent Cathy Mesiano, Expeditor, Applicant Agent • 61 ,441 June 29, 2002 Mr. Ben Orlowski-Chairman Planning Board Southold Village Hall Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski, Thank you for having arranged to have a full SEQRA review for the Hog Neck area. As a resident of Reydon Shores for 27 years, we are very concerned with the development of the entire Hog Neck peninsula. The entire character of the area has changed from woody and open spaces to one house after another. I fully understand the rights of the landowners and developers however they are changing the character of the peninsula forever, In the event Zoumasgets his way, I wonder where we can move to enable us to enjoy the rural atmosphere that we have enjoyed for years. Please continue to strive to maintain as much undeveloped land as you can. I wonder about the developers paying for Nelson, Pope and Voorhis' study. Is it possible that Nelson et. al, might lean more favorably towards the arm that actually writes the check? / Thanks fo your efforts! LarryX npy 2000 Reydon Drive Southold, NY 11971 1" a � JUL 0 zuu� PLANNING BOARD MEMBS • BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. OS`UFFO��-c P.O. Box 1179 Chairman �� OG Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J. CREMERS h� y Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS O Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y = Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO % • PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Memorandum To: Joshua W. Horton, Supervisor Members of the Town Board From: Valerie Scopaz, AICP, Town Planner G . Re: Hog Neck Date: June 24, 2002 Due to the length of time between initially scheduled public meetings, the Planning Board decided to hold a Special Meeting this evening. Among the items scheduled for a vote is a resolution to require a Generic Environmental Impact Statement for all pending subdivision applications within Hog Neck. If passed, this resolution would provide for the writing of one EIS for all of Hog Neck, as opposed to a separate EIS for each of the subdivision applications before the Planning Board. It is felt that a GIS would be a more efficient and cost-effective way of reviewing the anticipated cumulative environmental impacts. The applicants will be billed proportionately depending on the intensity of them eve opmen proposa :I IIIi lona app ica ions on og ec are ani i based on pre-submissions conferences that have taken place. These applications will be included within the scope of this GIS. If there are any questions, I am available to answer them. Christina Hudson 1155 Jacobs Lane JUN 19 2002 Southold, New York, 11971 631 -765 1329 Souftld%wn k Planning Bawd June 13°i, 2002 Hon. Bennett Orlowski Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski, Please accept this letter concerning the application by Zoumas Homes for two subdivisions in Bayview, one for 17 homes on 38 acres near North Bayview road and Bayview extension and the second subdivision for 22 homes on 48 acres near Harbor Lights Estates. The environmental depredations, traffic congestion, and school overcrowding which these 39 homes (constructed at the same time!) will cause is already well known to you. (see attached articles). Mr. Orlowski, you have a well earned record of being a guardian for the quality of life in this town, regardless of the pressure brought to bear on you by shortsighted developers. You have always taken the view that your decisions on the planning board are not just for us, but for our children and our children's children. Forgive me for being presumptous,but this has led me to conclude that you already oppose these developments (or because of their size and intrusiveness, they should be called the "Bayview Projects"). This letter is meant to urge you to stay the course and assure you of the community's unwavering support if you do so. Accordingly, the remainder of this letter is to give you information and proposals to help you counter the explanations of Zoumas's lawyers. There is an argument that may be of assistance to you in your decision to fight this development. One of the oldest common law principles pertaining to the use of land is the doctrine of nuisance. Stated succinctly, no one shall improve or use their land in such a manner as to injure the land of another. Based on your experience in these matters, it must be readily apparent that the Zoumas developments will injure the property of the other homeowners in Hogneck. The reasons are manifold: (1) The extra traffic on narrow roads designed with farmers tractors and Model Ts in mind; (2) the disruption of the deer population that will, in the short run, result in their destroying the plantings of the surrounding homeowners and (3) the strain on a water supply already overburdened by the pace of current home construction. In light of the recent moratorium on water hookups, is it not reasonable to conclude that the Bayview projects will be the straw that breaks the camel's back at the SCWA? If Zoumas Homes wants to build its development, we suggest that the planning board grant their application subject to the following reasonable conditions: (1)Bearing the costs of widening and improving all roads leading in and out of the developments to connection with Main road and the North Road. This will also include replacing the Goose Creek Bridge with a wider one to handle increased traffic, in accordance with current DOT specifications; (2) Bear the cost of running water mains to wells in the Pine Barrens Aquifer and hooking the local SCWA mains into same (3) Be responsible for relocation or sterilization of the deer population in Hogs neck and finally(4) Prepare all Environmental Impact Statements and reports deemed necessary in connection with this project (and the aforementioned remedial measures) and bear all costs associated with compliance. Once again, I want to thank you for your hard work all these years on behalf of our community. You're a credit to Southold and the elected officials who so wisely appointed you to your position. I remain, Sincerely yours, ! Christina Hudson Vw& 6 -e rft'& -i T s-it. JUN 4 212 southoldTowtn Mannins Baacd li��f7�`V S L.,' t b✓l yILI �A P I\JO ✓Lt4 �J Ut e--A A K.'V C,4 Lt Cc% 76 dLv�� �a 0 t �^�t d F l C�a hl-'(&L e NIL4 Lr��Zs � GF LV a s 5 11 a o�p os�J �Le�T 4ut zc s rl e a U� vtq , t-e,� wV5 �a2e L�f t �� ��� (c'� is ��`�`� �7 7(Dgn �Le-h,rvowy �O�cILA� Oa,� P4 Un�SeS witC. S �urt {�� v�y C� ( o twQl( 1..�O V�Tx 1M 6✓�QN�� . ..(, �-1�C O k a« �ie K,c., f-� C2 p dl.Ide At,L uQl�Cla �H WrLC 1� 2 c.> ��aP vwheU� l c LCS-�e ���b5 �na.csP � � W !�P ✓lei ? c�,� S�� ��� bv�u� Vvi n vt e t/kc9 r S e w c ( E il\e da -e wLS� �LLc �e�TluiY n I � � � e T �na vc Seen 4t Aq ( kzAZ-(o' gr- &t) l5 Js 4�we F 5pe R� emu P IAS S � e S a rr ee s �1(e�hT l �Fe o Pt Lee i Le6 7' �n ,2�ee o vet �ced� (Le A �I e Ja U;-a( w� a�y D � fes{ lZ-Jo CZ� n,e 2.�eLs v F 0 l �U[ s� � Q.VLQ D� �(— cn_ Sv S�„�-�� (-� ti w� . fou�D fAe �w� �(Le-�a ✓-� -t�,,e �lep t�GS or Lia ? ll - 6,,Ve7 s -kc St�G2o'P� • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK(9 • SIS M / ROBERT J.GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS May 29, 2002 CHARLES J.BARTHA,P.E. COMMISSIONER Town of Southold Planning Board Office P. O. Box 1179 53095 State Route 25 Southold,N. Y. 11971-0959 Attn: Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Chairman Gentlemen: Re: N/S of North Bayview Rd.,w/o Jacob's Lane, Southold SCTM# 1000-79-2-7 Proposed Major Subdivison Forestbrook at Bayview This Department has reviewed the above-referenced site plan. Specifically note that: Since this proposed development is not adjacent to a County maintained road or a road proposed for improvements by the County, a permit will not be required from this Department. If you have any questions,kindly contact this office at 852-4100. Very truly yours, William S. Shannon, P.E. Chief Engineer By: M.Paul Campagno WSS/MPC/VK/]n Permits Engineer SUFFOLK COUNTYIS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 335 YAPHANK AVENUE III (631)B52.4010 YAPHANK,N.Y. 7 1980 FAX(631)852-4150 +PLANNING BOARD MEMBER BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. O,SUFFO(�'C P.O. Box 1179 Chairman 0� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J. CREMERS =� Gy� Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS O - Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. H Z Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO WO • PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 14, 2002 Richard Lark, Esq. P. O. Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Forestbrook at Bayview North side of North Bayview Rd., approx. 227.76' west of Jacob's Lane, Southold SCTM# 1000-79-2-7 Zone: Agricultural Conservation Dear Mr. Lark: .r The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, May 13, 2002, adopted the following resolution. WHEREAS, this proposal is to subdivide a 37.77 acre parcel into 17 single family lots; and WHEREAS, prior to issuing any approvals for the proposed subdivision, the Planning Board is requiring that the concept be subject to SEQRA review; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board adopts the Environmental Assessment Review Report for Forestbrook at Bayview, dated April 25, 2002, prepared by Nelson Pope and Voorhis, LLC; therefore BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency has determined that the proposed action may have a significant impact on the environment and adopts a Positive Declaration for the proposed action. P Forestbrook at Bavview— Page Two — 5/14/02 Enclosed please find a copy of the Positive Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman encl. cc: Joshua Y. Horton, Supervisor Southold Town Board Gregory Yakaboski, Town Attorney Board of Trustees Building Department Southold Conservation Advisory Committee Melissa Sp!rn, Land Preservation Coordinator Suffolk County-Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Public Works NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Sharon Gustafson, MTA-LIRR PLANNING BOARD MEMBEI • BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. OSUFFD��C P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Q� Q Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J. CREMERS �� G'y� Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDS O Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. W Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO O PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 14-12-8(3/99)-9c SEQR State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance Project Number Date: 1000-79-2-7 Date: May 13, 2002 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Town of Southold Planning Board as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant impact on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Forestbrook at Bayview SEQR Status: Type 1 Unlisted X Scoping: No_ Yes X If yes, indicate how scoping will be conducted: Scoping sessions will be conducted at the Town of Southold Town Hall located at P.O. Box 1179, 53095 State Road 25, Southold, New York Description of Action: The proposed action is to subdivide a 37.77 acre parcel into 17 single family residential lots. The site is comprised of high quality woodlands, successional field and freshwater wetlands systems. SEAR Positive Declaration page 2 Location: The site is located on the Hog Neck peninsula in Southold. The parcel is located on the west side of North Bayview Road, approximately 250 feet west of Jacob's Lane. A location map is enclosed. Reasons Supporting This Determination: This proposed action may cause a significant adverse impact on the local environment individually and/or jointly when assessed cumulatively with the three additional,pending major subdivisions, listed below. A comprehensive cultural, environmental and infrastructure review must be conducted to determine the cumulative impacts to the parcel, community and the Hog's Neck peninsula. Relevant areas of environmental concern include: (1) The impacts to and potential of loss of quality wildlife habitat, species and valuable wildlife corridors. (2) The potential impacts to potential endangered, threatened and special concern wildlife species that may occur on site. (3) The loss of native vegetation cover including valuable woodlands. (4) The potential loss of archeological resources. (5) The impact of sanitary systems on groundwater. (6) The impact of increased water demand upon the existing water supply infrastructure. (7) The impact of stormwater runoff on slopes and wetland areas. (8) The indirect and direct impacts to the adjacent Critical Environmental Area, Goose Creek. (9) Impact on agricultural land resources. (10)Impact on aesthetic resources. (11)Impact on existing and future open space or recreational opportunities. (12)The increase in traffic and trip generations on the peninsula assessed to: local traffic patterns, limited ingress and egress points to the mainland and evacuation routes. (13)The cumulative impacts of the proposed action together with the three pending major subdivisions; Zoumas at Bayview (22 single family residential lots on 47.71 acres), Bayview Overlook (8 single family residential lots on 24.04 acres) and Dayton Farms (5 lots on 13.45 acres). SEAR Positive Declaration page 3 (14) The assessment of a no action alternative. A detailed narrative outlining these concerns is attached. For Further Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner Address: P.O. Box 1179, 5309 State Road 25, Southold,New York 11971 Telephone Number: 631-765-1938 extension 243 A copy of this notice must be sent to: Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany,New York 12233-1750 Chief Executive Officer, Town/CityNillage of Any person requesting a copy All Involved agencies Applicant (If any) Environmental Notice Bulletin, Room 538, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12233-1750 NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL, PLANNING, CONSULTING (631)427-5665 572 Walt Whitman Road FAX(631)427-5620 Melville,NY 11747 TO: Mark Terry Date: 30-Apr-02 Town of Southold Planning Board Office,Town Hall Re: Forestbrook,Bayview 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971-0959 Job No. NP&V#01218 We are sending you Under separate cover X Herewith Pick Up By Messenger For Your Review&Comment Approval X As requested X For your use Bid Submission uantit Drawl n Title Sheet No. Date 1 Updated Environmental Assessment Review 1 Updated EAF Part II Remarks: Please feel free to call should you have any questions or require any additional information. W 0 2 2001 Soudwid Town Very truly yours, ��d d NELSON,POPE&VOORHIS,LLC �r NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS. LLC B Shana Lace ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING y: y Forestbrook @ Bayview EAF Part I Review NP&V#01218 �o ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS FORESTBROOK @ BAYVIEW Prepared for: Valerie Scopaz,Town Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Office,Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-0959 Prepared by: Nelson, Pope &Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 Date: February 4, 2002 (updated April 25,2002) The Town of Southold Planning Board has retained Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NP&V) for consulting services in review of the above referenced application. The proposed action involves the subdivision of a 37.771 acre parcel into 17 residential lots. Fifteen (15) of the lots range in size from 38,006 s.f. to 59,789 s.f., with the remaining lots totaling 7.2691 acres and 8.1979 acres. A 3.27 acre recharge basin is proposed along the eastern property boundary in the central portion of the site and a natural buffer of approximately 50 feet in depth will be retained within the individual lots along the length of the North Bayview Road frontage. An out parcel is located in the northwest portion of the site (tax lot 6 owned by Hale), which is currently accessed via a 20 foot right of way extending westward from North Road To Bayview. The site consists of vacant, undeveloped land that is dominated by early successional vegetation and woodland habitats and contains several dirt paths/trails located throughout formerly cleared areas in the southern portion of the site. The site contains a small portion of NYSDEC designated freshwater wetland SO-38 in the northwest corner of this site with an additional "unmapped" wetland located just south of this feature. This document analyzes the site and area resources including topography, soils, water, land use, zoning and transportation and other available information. The site has also been inspected for environmental/planning constraints. In addition, the full EAF Part I submitted with the application has been corrected and is attached herein. Page 1 • • Forestbrwk @ Bayview EAF Part I Review NP&V#01218 Location and Site Overview The subject property is located on the north side of North Bayview Road, approximately 226 feet west of North Road To Bayview/Jacobs Lane in Bayview, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The subject property can be more particularly described as SCTM number 1000-79-02-07. The site contains a total of approximately 1,259 feet of frontage on North Bayview Road to the south and a total of 315 feet of frontage on North Road To Bayview along the eastern property boundary in the central portion of the site. An out parcel is located in the northwest portion of the site (tax lot 6 owned by Hale), which is currently accessed via a 20 foot right of way extending westward from North Road To Bayview. The site consists of vacant, undeveloped land that is dominated by early successional species and woodland habitats and contains several dirt paths/trails located throughout formerly cleared areas in the southern portion of the site. The site contains a small portion of NYSDEC designated freshwater wetland SO-38 in the northwest corner of this site with an additional "unmapped" wetland located just south of this feature. Tidal wetlands associated with Goose Creek are located north of the site. Additionally, the site contains several areas of steep slopes, particularly in the western portion of the site. This review will discuss the proposed project and its potential impact on the land resources. Proposed Project The proposed action involves the subdivision of a 37.771 acre parcel into 17 residential lots. Fifteen (15) of the lots range in size from 38,006 s.f. to 59,789 s.f., with the remaining lots totaling 7.2691 acres and 8.1979 acres. A 3.27 acre recharge basin is proposed along the eastern property boundary in the central portion of the site and a natural buffer of approximately 50 feet in depth will be retained within the individual lots along the length of the North Bayview Road frontage. However, as this vegetative buffer is part of the proposed lots, it may be difficult to maintain as natural and the Planning Board may want to consider the proposed vegetative buffer area as dedicated open space. The proposed project will utilize private wells and sanitary systems within the individual lots. The proposed single site access is provided via North Bayview Road, which splits in the center of the site forming two cul de sacs to provide access to the individual lots. Slopes in excess of 15% have been depicted on the Cluster Subdivision Map and assuming that the area beyond the building envelopes of Lots 5 and 6 remains natural, areas in excess of 15% slope will be preserved, with the exception of those steep slopes within the recharge basin parcel. Further, with regard to future access to the out-parcel, the cluster subdivision map indicates that an access parcel will be dedicated to the out-parcel such that future access will be achieved via Road "A". The subdivision map further indicates that the existing right of way will remain in servient ownership of lots 6, 7 and the recharge basin, although a covenant may be made so that the owners will not have a right of way to North Road To Bayview. Several scenarios regarding future access to the outparcel were offered by the applicant's attorney, which further indicated that negotiations would be finalized once sketch plan approval is obtained. It appears, as per the applicants attorneys letter dated October 30, 2001, that the owners of the out-parcel could refuse A� NELSON, POPE 6 VOORHIS.LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING Page 2 Forestbrook @ Bayview EAF Part I Review NP&V#01218 to relinquish the right of way thereby maintaining some type of right of access. Clarification as to this right of way should be determined. Should the right of way remain as is, the Planning Board may wish to consider removal of this area from within the individual lots. To date, the Planning Board has not accepted the yield map nor has the Planning Board granted sketch plan approval on the major subdivision map. The applicant proposes the subdivision as a cluster design, in that 15 of the proposed lot sizes have been reduced and are less than the dimensional requirements of the Agricultural Conservation (AC) zoning district. Through the Cluster Development process, such lots would be permitted according to 100-181(A)(3) provided the minimum lot size shall be at least 30,000 s.f. in area without connection to public water and sewers. Typically, cluster subdivisions are granted in order to preserve open space and/or environmentally sensitive features on the site in perpetuity. With the exception of the recharge basin and internal roadways, the remainder of the parcel will be allocated into individual lots and no portion of the site will be preserved in common or public ownership as open space. Similar to the natural buffer proposed within the individual lots along North Bayview Road, the natural areas within lots 5 and 6 may be difficult to maintain; as such, the Planning Board may wish to consider reducing the lot size of these two lots in conformance with the remainder of the subdivision such that the remainder of these areas may be preserved as open space. Land Use and Zonini? The project site is located in an area that contains a mix of residential, agricultural and undeveloped vacant land. The dominant land use in the general area is residential, and the proposed application is consistent with surrounding uses. The site is currently vacant undeveloped land, with the proposed development resulting in 17 residential lots. No portion of the site will remain in open space and/or open space easements as indicated at this time, with the exception of the 50' buffer proposed along North Bayview Road. Residential land uses are located to the east and northwest of the site, with vacant undeveloped land located to the west. Additional residential uses are located to the south, with agricultural uses located to the southeast. The subject site is zoned A-C Agricultural Conservation (A-C) District, which requires a minimum lot size of 80,000 SF, lot coverage of 20% of the lot area, and a minimum livable floor area of 850 s.f. per dwelling. The proposed lots are less than the dimensional requirements within the A-C zoning district, however, should the Planning Board consider a cluster subdivision, smaller lots may be approved based on an overall yield in order to preserve open space and/or environmentally sensitive features. The use of clustering allows these dimensional requirements to be reduced in order to maintain a larger part of the site as natural open space. As indicated on the Cluster Subdivision Map, the proposed lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-40 zoning district. Maximum permitted lot coverage within the R-40 zoning district is equivalent to 20% of the lot area, and the required front yard, side yard, and rear yard dimensions are 60, 20/45, and 75 feet, respectively. Residential development of the resulting lots created by the cluster subdivision should not require zoning variances, depending on final building design and layout. rr NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING Page 3 • Forestbrook @ Bayview EAF Part I Review NP&V#01218 R-40 zoning is located to the west, east and southeast of the site, with AC zoning located to the southwest and further to the east. With respect to land use, the proposed project is similar to the residential developments in the surrounding area and is an allowable use within the A-C zoning district. However, a previously stated, no dedicated preserved open space is depicted on the Cluster Subdivision Map. The land use and zoning impacts of the proposed project are expected to be marginal. The Town of Southold Community Preservation Project Plan identifies how the Town intends to preserve or protect properties that are integral to the unique community character of Southold and is a guide intended for interested land owners who voluntarily chose to work with the Town to preserve and protect privately owned real estate assets in a way that benefits the community at large as well as the owner. The site is listed on the Eligible Parcel List in the Community Preservation Project Plan, and is classified as "open space, including agricultural lands." The project is not generally consistent with the goals and objectives of the Southold Town Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy to preserve land that is suitable for farming and to ensure that farming remains an important part of the local economy. Further, the proposed project is not expected to be entirely consistent with the recommendations/findings of the Town of Southold Water Supply Management & Watershed Protection Strategy, which offers opportunities to ensure the protection of sufficient quality and quantity of groundwater supply for present and future use and to ensure that the rural/agricultural character of the Town is maintained. It is recognized that this study did not specifically address the subject site or area. Additionally, findings to the projects consistency with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and the Peconic Estuary Program should be identified. Traffic Generation The proposed use would be expected to increase traffic generation upon full development of the site as compared to existing conditions. Due to the location of the site and in consideration of area roadways, an increase in trip generation at the site may have a significant impact on the area roadways, particularly in conjunction with other development projects in the area; these potential impacts are cumulative and need to be taken into consideration. The vertical and horizontal road curvature allows relatively good sight distance. An additional 17 residential dwellings would be expected to generate a total of 21 trips during the weekday AM peak hour, 22 trips during the weekday PM peak hour and 26 trips during the Saturday peak hour. Since access to the community is restricted, the proposed project in combination with other projectst may create a cumulative impact on critical intersections and a more detailed traffic impact study may be warranted. The traffic impact study should also consider the effects of the project on these intersections should evacuation of the Hogs Neck peninsula become necessary. Soils and Tonography The site is relatively flat throughout, with all existing slopes in the proposed development area between approximately 0-10%. Steep slopes exist adjacent to the south side of the freshwater wetland in the northern portion of the site and adjacent to the ponded area south of this feature. It is expected that these areas will be preserved following development as they are located NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS,LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING CONSULTING Page 4 Forestbrook C&Bayview EAF Part I Review NP&V#01218 outside of the building envelopes in Lots 5 and 6. The areas proposed for development are relatively flat, however steep slopes located within the recharge basin parcel will be disturbed. The Suffolk County soil survey (Warner, 1975) identifies seven soil types on the subject site, which consist of the following: Plymouth loamy sand, PIC- 8 to 15 percent slopes, excessively drained Plymouth loamy sand, PIA-0 to 3 percent slopes, excessively drained Carver and Plymouth sands, CpE- 15 to 35 percent slopes,excessively drained Riverhead sandy loam, RdC- 8 to 15 percent slopes,well drained Riverhead sandy loam, RdB-3 to 8 percent slopes, well drained Riverhead sandy loam, RdA-0-3 percent slopes, well drained Haven Loam, He-thick surface layer The Riverhead series consists of deep, well-drained moderately coarse textures soils that formed a mantle of sandy loam or fine sandy loam over thick layers of coarse sand and gravel (Warner, 1975). The soil survey lists the erosion hazard for RdA as slight, and the soil is limited by moderate doughtiness in the moderately coarse textured solum. The soil survey lists the erosion hazard for RdB as moderate to slight and the main concerns of management are controlling runoff and erosion and providing adequate moisture for landscaping/agriculture. The erosion hazard for RdC soils is moderately severe, and controlling erosion is the main concern of management. Carver series also consists of deep, excessively drained coarse-texture soils. The hazard of erosion is moderate to severe on CpE soils, which tend to be droughty and have a low natural fertility. Moderately steep to steep slopes are a limitation to use and these soils are poorly suited to crops commonly grown in the county. The Plymouth series also consists of deep, excessively drained, coarse-textured soils. PIA soils are fairly well suited to crops, with many areas formerly cleared for forming. The erosion hazard is slight for this soil type and moderate to severe in the PIC soil type due to slopes and the sandy texture of the soils. Slope and doughtiness are the main limitations on PIC soils. The Haven series consists of deep, well- drained, medium-textured soils; He soils have a light erosion hazard, except where the soil receives large amounts of water from adjoining sloping soils. The Soil Survey of Suffolk County also indicates the presence of a "wet spot' and an "unclassified intermittent stream", which extends from the western portion of the project site to Goose Creek to the north. The wet spot is located along the northwestern property boundary, and is expected to reflect the northern most wetland. As this portion of the site is expected to remain natural following development, no adverse impacts are anticipated. The topography and soils on site do not appear to present severe development constraints, provided proper planning and design are utilized in more sensitive areas. The depth to groundwater is considered in the subsections dealing with water resources. Wetlands As previously stated, the site contains a small portion of NYSDEC designated freshwater wetland SO-38 in the northwest corner of the site with an additional unmapped ponded area b M� NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING Page 5 • • Forestbrook @ Bayview EAF Part I Review NP&V#01218 located just south of this feature. The National Wetland Inventory Prepared by the US Fish and Wildlife Service depicts both of these wetlands, although this map does not necessary confer any regulatory authority. Tidal wetlands associated with Goose Creek are located north of the site. As depicted on the Cluster Subdivision Plan, the proposed lots will be located more than 100 feet from the freshwater wetland boundaries, with the exception of lot 3 which is located a minimum distance of 90 feet. The applicant has indicated that the wetlands were flagged and are depicted on the Cluster Subdivision Map; it is recommended that the Cluster Subdivision map reflect the delineated wetland boundary with the name of the individual and date of the delineation. It appears that the wetland boundary, particularly adjacent to the "Irrigation Pond", may extend slightly beyond that as depicted on the Cluster Subdivision Map. The NYSDEC and Town Trustees regulate those activities within 100 feet of a designated freshwater wetland. It is recommended that the freshwater wetland boundaries be verified by the NYSDEC and Town Trustees, so that appropriate setbacks may be confirmed and maintained. The freshwater wetland system and intermittent stream on site eventually flow into the tidal waters of Goose Neck Creek, which is documented as one of the Town's most productive shellfish waters. The site is expected to be located beyond the jurisdictional limits of the NYSDEC under Article 25. The Town and State wetland boundaries should be delineated and confirmed such that appropriate setbacks may be obtained; the applicant should also obtain non- jurisdiction letters from both agencies. Water Resources Public water is supplied to the general area by the Suffolk County Water Authority, although the site itself is not specifically connected to public water. The closest water main to the site is 12 inches in diameter and is located on the north side of North Bayview Road and Reydon Drive, located approximately 2,400 feet east of the site. An 8" diameter main is also located on the north side of Main Bayview Road, approximately 2,000 feet south of the site. The Main Bayview Road Well Field & Pump Station is located on the southwest corner of the Main Bayview Road and Avenue of Trees intersection, approximately 3,600 southeast of the project site. It is estimated that the 17 proposed residential lots will utilize approximately 5,100 gallons of water per day. It is recommended that the applicant contact SCWA for a determination of the availability of Public Water Supply for this project. Sanitary disposal within the proposed subdivision will be managed by on-site underground sewage leaching systems. In 1978, the Long Island Regional Planning Board published the Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 Study). The 208 Study identified eight (8) hydrogeologic zones in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. These zones were distinguished based upon differences in underlying groundwater flow patterns and water quality. The subject site is located within SCDHS Groundwater Management Zone IV, which according to Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, has an allowable flow of 600 gallons per day (gpd) per acre in areas served by public water. Therefore, the allowable nitrogen bearing flow for the overall 37.771 acres site is 22,663 gpd, or less with subtraction of surface water and wetlands from the computation. The sanitary design flow is computed using SCDHS manual Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Other Than NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING Page 6 Forestbrook @ Bayview EAF Part I Review NP&V#01218 Single Family Residences. The manual establishes the design flow as follows: Single family dwelling 300 gpd x 17 dwellings 5,100 gpd Therefore, the proposed applications would conform with Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and would not be expected to adversely affect groundwater quality provided properly functioning systems are designed and installed. The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site is less than 3 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the 1999 SCDHS water table map. The topographic elevation on site ranges from approximately 2-34 feet above msl, based on the Cluster Sketch Plan. Therefore, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 0-31 feet. The direction of groundwater flow is expected to be horizontal and toward the nearest surface water northwest of the site. The depth to groundwater on site is not expected to have significant constraints on the location of septic systems within the proposed residential lots, as these lots are located at a minimum elevation of approximately 14 feet above msl. A standard, three pool septic system typically requires a minimum depth to groundwater of approximately 9-10 feet to allow adequate depth for leaching. All lots will be expected to have obtained SCDHS approval prior to construction. Private water supply wells and on-site sanitary systems are proposed. Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) Realty subdivision (Article 6) and water supply (Article 4) approval is required. Ecological Resources The majority of the site contains successional and mature woodland with the majority of the center and southeastern portions of the site dominated by early successional pioneer species. The site is part of a relatively large contiguous block of woodland and is expected to support a variety of wildlife species including birds, mammals and amphibians. No rare, threatened or endangered plants were observed on site. The NY Natural Heritage Program (ECL 9-1503) was contacted to determine if there is any record of rare plants or wildlife in the vicinity. The Program does not identify this area as a Significant Wildlife Habitat, however lists one threatened vascular plant, three endangered vascular plants, and one endangered beetle on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. All of the species listed have historical records in the vicinity, making it unlikely that they are currently present in the area. Additionally, tiger salamander breeding ponds have been identified in the vicinity. The wetlands on and adjacent to the site may contain suitable breeding habitat for these species. The NYSDEC typically requires that 50% of the woodland vegetation be retained within a 1,000' radius of a tiger salamander breeding pond. It is recommended that on site surveys be conducted to determine the suitability of habitat for the tiger salamander and that on site surveys be conducted to determine species presence. The proposed project will result in clearing the majority of the property, causing localized impacts to wildlife. Clearing and development impacts to vegetation and wildlife are cumulative and need to be taken into consideration. It is anticipated that the entire northern and eastern portion so the site within lots 5 and 6 will remain natural. As previously stated, the Board may wish to consider reducing the lot sizes for these two lots to conform with the remainder of the subdivision and preserve the remainder of these lots as open space. �r NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS.LLC ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING Page 7 Forestbrook @ Bayview EAF Part I Review NP&V#01218 Cultural Resources The site is currently vacant undeveloped land, dominated by early successional and mature forested habitats. Views of the site interior area limited, with the exception of the southeastern portion of the site. Although a vegetation buffer will remain along the North Bayview Road frontage, the proposed project will result in clearing of natural vegetation currently screening the site, potentially resulting in aesthetic impacts. Additionally, potential impacts with respect to open space and recreational resources have been identified. The site does not contain any currently documented historically and archaeological significant resources, although is depicted on the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (NYS OPRHP) Circles and Squares Map as being located within an area or in close proximity to an area of archaeological sensitivity. The NYS OPRHP was contacted to determine the archeological/historical sensitivity of the site. Correspondence from NYS OPRHP is attached herein and indicates that there is an archeological site in or adjacent to the project area warranting the completion of a Phase I archaeological survey. SUMMARY In conclusion, the proposed application would create 17 residential lots, which would generally conform to the character of the area. The site contains significant environmental features that would limit residential development, which could be protected to the maximum extent practical through the development of a Cluster Subdivision. The submitted cluster design allocates the entire subject parcel into individual lots, recharge areas and internal roadways, and no permanent preservation of open space has been indicated at this time with the exception of a 50 foot natural buffer within individual lots along the length of North Bayview Road. The proposed project will increase wastewater generation, solid waste generation and water use, in addition to increasing taxes which would be distributed to the various jurisdictions. The site is expected to increase the number of trips entering and exiting the site; the potential for cumulative impacts exists. It is expected that an approximately 100 foot natural buffer will remain adjacent to the freshwater wetland habitats, which will also result in the preservation of several areas of steep slopes. Impacts to ecological resources are expected, with the potential for the development to impact an endangered species. Further, the potential cumulative impacts of this project combined with the Zoumas at Bayview subdivision application as well as other subdivision applications should be considered. It is recommended that further review be conducted with regard to cultural resources involving a Stage IA and Stage IB Cultural Resources Survey for areas which will be developed. Recommendations and findings of this report which the Planning Board may wish to consider are listed below: 1. A natural buffer of approximately 50 feet in depth will be retained within the individual lots along the length of North Bayview Road frontage. However, as this vegetative buffer is part of the proposed lots, it may be difficult to maintain as natural and the Planning Board may want to consider the proposed vegetative buffer area as dedicated open space. 2. Clarification as to the existing right of way should be determined. Should the existing right of way remain as is, the Planning Board may wish to consider removal of this area from within the individual lots. �r NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS,LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING Page 8 Forestbrook @ Bayview EAF Part I Review NP&V#01218 3. Similar to the natural buffer proposed within the individual lots along North Bayview Road, the natural areas within lots 5 and 6 may be difficult to maintain; as such, the Planning Board may wish to consider reducing the lot size of these two lots in conformance with the remainder of the subdivision such that the remainder of these areas may be preserved as open space. 4. The applicant has indicated that the wetlands were flagged and are depicted on the Cluster Subdivision Map; it is recommended that the Cluster Subdivision map reflect the delineated wetland boundary with the name of the individual and date of the delineation. 5. It is recommended that the freshwater wetland boundaries be verified by the NYSDEC and Town Trustees, so that appropriate setbacks may be confirmed and maintained. 6. It is recommended that the applicant contact SCWA for a determination of the availability of Public Water Supply for this project. 7. The Board may wish to consider reducing the lot sizes for these two lots to conform with the remainder of the subdivision and preserve the remainder of these lots as open space. 8. It is recommended that surveys of the on-site ponds be conducted to determine the suitability of habitat for the tiger salamander; should the ponds and surrounding contain suitable habitat, it is further recommended that surveys be conducted to determine the species presence. 9. Since access to the community is restricted, the proposed project in combination with other planned projects may create a cumulative impact on critical intersections and a more detailed traffic impact study may be warranted. The traffic impact study should also consider the effects of the project on these intersections should evacuation of the Hogs Neck peninsula become necessary. 10. The NYS OPRHP was contacted to determine the archeologicabhistorical sensitivity of the site. Correspondence from NYS OPRHP is attached herein and indicates that there is an archeological site in or adjacent to the project area warranting the completion of a Phase I archaeological survey. Based upon this review, the impacts noted, and the opportunity to explore alternatives, the Board may wish to consider requiring a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) through the issuance of a Positive Declaration. This would provide a means or documenting and analyzing potential impacts in an orderly review process which allows for consideration of mitigation and alternatives. If the Board finds that there are no potential significant adverse impacts, then a Negative Declaration could be considered; however, it is recommended that the items listed above be addressed. �r NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING Page 9 Part 2�ROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIROGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. FInstructionss (Read carefully) r each of the 20 questionsin PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. answers should be considered as Yes answers. ering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If Impact will occur but ld is lower than example, check column 1. ing that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Anylarge impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2FCana Small to PotentiaBe IMPACT ON LAND Moderate LargeBy 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Impact Impactnge Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NO MYES • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceedNo 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑3 feet. a No • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑• Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ No 3 feet of existing ground surface. ❑ ❑Yes []No • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ than one phase or stage. ❑ �.JYes ❑No • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 El — -� tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. '� I_.Yes ❑No • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. n • Construction in a designated floodway. L7-Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ • Other impacts El Yes ❑No❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)INNO ❑YES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 • 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO BYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ Eyes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: Ceusrnucne.n'OrSlUf.6A4tb W 1Mrft" ,*r A"A ❑ §Yes El No op l7ESrVUA4gh Fill"hwm-trL wsTg_oi,3 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ L-2 Eyes [I No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ Eyes []No • Other impacts: Asrn[tur To ❑ E ayes 7—No ATOM ' Dk616.0 A'Cf�e �+Er�w.un 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ❑NO 9YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ Eyes ENo • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ Eyes El No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. E ❑ EYes 11 No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ E UYes El No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 11 No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7 Will proposed action affect air quality? ENO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [I No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ Dyes []No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ El []Yes --]No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ❑NO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ WYes []No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ EYes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ❑NO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ENO migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ f Eyes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ❑NO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 + The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ■ ❑ wYes [I No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO BYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ §Yes El No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ IS Eyes El No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Eyes No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ❑NO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ Byes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ . dyes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 []NO EYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. WYes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 9 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON.CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique character- istics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.14(8) ? ENO DYES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No • Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No resource? • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 7—Yes ❑No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ❑NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • .Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. u ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ a Eyes ❑No • Other impacts: CvM.w►ldWot ;fAlf T 'i' 945- UMD ❑ IN UYes ❑No Acctss Th 40 As mitt IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ENO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ JYes No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ Eyes No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No 10 2 3 NOISE AND AR IMPACTS Small to Potential Can Impact Be 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result Moderate Large Mitigated By of the Proposed Action? ONO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? SNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ []Yes El NO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes El No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? ONO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ []Yes []No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ GYes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ :]Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ Eyes ENo (eg. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [:]Yes []No 20 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? LINO SYES If any action in Part 2 is Identified as a potential large impact or If you cannot determine the magnitude of impact, proceed to Part 3 11 • J.�.�ag' 4 5755 N Bay}view Rd, Southold, N1- 11971-3916 �� r NcOM'�� May 14, 2002 WMa Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Chairman-Planning Board Southhold Town Hall ;-;< P.O.Boa 1179 MAY 1 5 2UUY Southold,N.Y. 11971-0959 Dear Mr.Chairman, Southold TownPlanning Board The North Fork,and in particular,the town of Southold,has become and is becoming,one of the East Ends favorite and popular places to reside,resulting in our continued growth and expansion as well as much busier roadways. This is called "progress" and it can be difficult to control and manage,but there has to be responsibility and concern about this growth and expansion. One of our important and vital concerns besides roads and highways to handle this,is the availability of fresh water. As we know,there are a number of well established farms,vineyards,and nurseries here in the town of Southold and their related heavy demands for water to sustain their businesses as well as to provide sufficient water to service the schools,homes and other business in our area. We trust there has been,or should be professional engineering surveys done to support as well as ascertain the need for water in our area without jeopardizing our future water supply. Currently,there will be approximately 13 to 14 houses to be built off "Oaklawn" across from the elementa� school rex and we are now considering 17 additional houses at A� ',9 lots in 24 acres at"Bayview Overlook at Southold",as well as 221ots on 48.2 acres by Zoumas Contracting Corp.at Bayview,for a total of over 60 houses in just one general area of Southold, and undoubtedly there will be more to follow. In essence,after all this growth,we do not want to wake up and find out we have a water alert or emergency because there is not sufficient available fresh water to handle and meet all our needs. Too much-too late syndrome! In conclusion,I am sure our citizens will appreciate the Planning Committee's utmost concerns and consideration regarding our future growth and expansion and its possible effect if not controlled and managed accordingly. Thank you. Siinncce�rel(y�yours John J. Vog 5785 North Bayview Road (765-2471) i Mr. Bennett Orlowski. Jr. Katy Walser Chairman,Planning Dept. 4760 North Bayview Rd. Southold Town Southold,MY 11971 Southold Town Hall May 13, 2002 53095 Main Rd. Southold,N.Y 11971 5� d � uci MAY 15 2002 Dear Mr. Orlowski and Members of the Board: Southold Town pjZm-min's uoalI Recently I have discovered that the woodland behind my home will be knocked down and developed for the Forest Brook Project. If this were true, that would mean a huge homewould be placed right behind my house. So, whenever I want to go outside and relax , someones backyard will be right before my eyes. I'm only fourteen , and ever since I learned how to walk and talk, I have realized how lucky my family and I are to have such great land and privicy. I've even got to know my neighbors so well since there aren't so many, they act as my second and third families. Since I can remember,I've taken walks either alone, or with a family member, through what used to be a park. The land behind me has trails, swamps, deer, and any wildlife you can imagine.There also is an old dump behind one of my neighbors backyard where antique bottles of perfume, drinks, and even kitchenware is, ext,where I soemimes explore with permission. And behind all of that, are little swamps filled with frogs, which my little brother and I catch to observe. Also, in the winter the two lakes freeze over for iceskating, which I wait for every year,hoping for a cold winter. On the other side of my home alies a meadow which I walk around about everyday with my Mom and dog. My dog, seems to have the most fun, chasing all the deer and sometimes even foxes. This land is the prettiest in the Town of Southold, and for that I don't think a single tree should be knocked down. If the town decideds to develop, a driveway would be placed, pracctilly in my backyard and a million dollar house on top of that. My neighbors and my whole family are very upset about this whole thing. Ever since my neighborhood heard about this we've all been very depressed. Already homes are being put in front,back, and next to other houses. The newcomers from up the island or from the city,thinking southold as such a wonderful place and not caring if a house is 10 feet away from there doorstep. Im not just speaking for myself but for the rest of southold to please not build on the land, especially behind North Bayview Road. In the past two years,I've seen Southold grow more then ever before in my life. When I was younger I didn't even have to look out for traffic and was allowed on a bikeroad at the age four because there was no traffic. Now, when I even want to get the mail, I'm not suprised i fit takes me a few minutes to cross the street for a line of traffic to pass through. It seems now, if I were living on the side of the highway. Even when i want to jog or walk my dog, it seems I have to run/walk on peoples front lawns the whole time. It may seem like no big deal for some, but if houses or even a single house is assigned behind mine, I know now my whole life and my memories will be changed and the memories of my house and property. I'll try and do what it takes to stop the building and development of the Forest Brook Project. Even if I have to tum over every single rock and dig millions of holes to find any little evidence, anything,that proved to you, that your building not only on my memorable land, but southolds land. Please take this letter into consideration and once again I beg you, please don't develop the Forest Brook Proposel. Thank you for your time and concern, k r LARK & FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD-P.O.BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935-0973 Tele.No.(631)734-6807 Fax No. (631)734-5651 RICHARD F. LARK MARY LOU FOLTS May 13 , 2002 ;?T/o -2-9, Azz Mr. Mark Terry /J l�/etcJE/� - Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE : Applicant - Forestbrook Builders Inc . Agent - Lark & Folts, Esqs . Major Subdivision for Forestbrook at Bayview (SCTM #1000-79-2-7) Dear Mr. Terry: Pursuant to your letter dated May 1, 2002 , I am enclosing Check No. 1038 of Forestbrook Builders Inc . payable to Town of Southold in the amount of $250 . 00 which represents the remaining SEQRA fee . Very txi}ly yours, RFL/bd Richard F. Lark Enclosure MAY 1 s 201 Southold Town Vr Planning Board t ' MAY 13 2002 Southold Town Planning Board T16 4.25 1257 P.01i02 _- NELSON POPE rm VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRO'AENTAI PLANNING • CONSLLTING 5T2. WALT Vli,M/AN ROAD, MQLVLLE,NY 1 1747'-2108 If [631`, A27.5emsi FAX tR311 487-50a0 np' 'Anel3arpape`=o FAX COVER SHEET To: Mark Terry Phone: 765-1438 Fax: 765-3136 Frons: Shana Lacey Date: April 25, 2002 Re: Cost Proposal; Forestbrook No. of Pages: 2 (including Cover) Comments: As discussed Please let nw know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Shana 516 425 12S7 P.02.'02 _ NELSON, POPE & VOORMIS, LLC ! IV 1 H ON M N N "' A L M L A h IN I N G C 11N G T I N O CHAHLF-'n:"00RHIS.GEC.ACCP•AHTM1JH a KJcRbEP,PF.•J'NCCNT G DONNELLY.YF /IC'CP BERT.Rt •de66Pa R EPIPAkIA,PC,,M35Z^T C.NBLF'I[IN,.1 R.,Pr. PAUL M.PUC;(,P,LP. April 25,2002 Mark Tem 'Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road PO Box t 179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Town of Southold. SEQRA Review Forestbrook Subdivision,Hogs Neck NP&V 001218 Dear Mark; Thank you for contacting IVP&V for services in connection with SEAR review and the implementation of the above referenced project. The following services and fees we proposed 1. Inspect property and area to determine environmental resources and characteristics. 2. Review Part I Environmental Assessment Form(if available). 3. Prepared Part Q Environmental Assessment Form. 4- Prepare detailed environmental,planning review of the subject application. Fee: $750.00 S. Review supplemental information submitted by the applicant in support of the application, 6. Preparad recommended determination of significance(if requested by Board), Fee: Time Rates Thank you for the opportunity to assist on this project. Please feet free to call should you have any queitions. Respectfully submitted, NEtsox, & oo C Charles J. oarhis,CEP,AICP C7e WALT WHITMAN ACAD. MS�VU66F. NV 11747-2100 18311 497-SBBS• -A% 1831:477-$6510•www.nolgcnpopa.00m TOTAL P.02 April 11, 2002 M Mark Terry Planning Board, Town of Southold Southold, NY 11971 Re: Forestbrook Subdivision (sec.79, block 02, lot 07) Dear Mark: Thank you for your time last Thursday when I stopped in to inquire about the Forestbrook subdivision. You said you would like to know what types of wildlife are in the proposed subdivision. We have lived on Goose Creek Lane the past 18 years and have appreciated the privacy and feeling of being a part of nature and hope it will not change. Over the years, in addition to the ever present deer, rabbits, squirrels and birds of so many species, we have seen fox and bobwhite, we have watched snapping turtles lay their eggs, have seen box turtles and laughed at ducks that have tried to make a home in our pool. A great blue heron, egrets and osprey visit the freshwater pond bordering our property where peepers tell us spring is here and are lorded over by a very commanding bullfrog. Some snakes and two types of salamanders have made their presence felt. Two great horned owls roost in the trees and delight us with their calls in the early morning and late afternoons. A subdivision of the kind you have before you would change all this dramatically. When we purchased the property we were told that the woods were protected and would never be built on - a promise that seems to be at risk. We also have strong fears that septic and other runoff will contaminate our groundwater and seep into the pond and wells. While phragmites are a problem we fear the pond will be spoiled and the wildlife we treasure will be no longer. With the current drought situations what will be the effect on our aquifer and wells as a result of the extraordinary amount of building going on. The site plan for the Forestbrook subdivision in your office does not include the freshwater pond, and I hope you have checked into it as you said you would. It is also incorrect in that our property has a neighbor's name to it and his lot is not shown. I cannot believe the pond was "inadvertently' left off the site plan or that a application would check "no' as to whether there would be an impact on wildlife or the environment. There has to be a balance in nature and building over woods and wetlands not only harms our environment but destroys the very reason so many live here - the open spaces. I believe that maintaining the rural character of the east end is primary and it may be time for a moratorium on new building until you can see where you are. Once it is overbuilt it cannot be undone. I trust the Planning Board will consider all the implications and not just a developer's need to make more money at the expense of all that we who are living here hold dear. Sincerely, �� w red Cullen 45G ya ,i1 'ray ooseCreek Lane, /�aX/5�� �j►, rI Southold APR 15 2UU2 Southold Town Planning Boars! • �S �'CD � PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS UFFO( BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. h�0 P.O. Box 1179 Chairman C Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J. CREMERS Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDSp Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORRICHARDGE RITCHCAGGO IE LATHAM,JR y�Q �aO�� Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Elizabeth A. Neville, Southold Town Clerk From: Victor L'Eplattenier, Senior Planiv Date: March 18,2002 Re: NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Correspondence Archaeological and Historical Sensitivity Attached please find correspondence from Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC, pertaining to five sites, two of which are affordable housing sites currently under review for proposed zoning changes to AHD. This correspondence is being forwarded to you for your attention and any recommendations the Town Board may have regarding these sites. encl. rIHK-t G-wnG t1 L�7 NtLbUN & YUYtILLY J1b 42Y Sb2o H.01111 ' NELSON, POPE & C ' 'II ENVIRONMENTAL \/UORHIS, `572 WALT WHITMAN R PLMEVING CONSU �1 ®31) 4275665 .��' M� LTING [ LVILLEW 1'1747-278e FAX I631) 427-0820 np�ancleonpope.com FAX COVER SHEET To: Victor LaPlatnea Far 765-1823 From: Shana Lacey Date: March 11, 2002 Re: NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Correspondence No. of Pages: 12 (including Cover) Comments: Victor, Attached please find the correspondence from NYS OPRHP with regard to archaeological and historical sensitivity on the following parcels/projects: 1. Zoumas, Bayview 2. I Marine, Greenport 4. Skrezic, Peconic 5- Mattituck Housing, Mattituck Please feel free to call should you have any questions or require any additional information. Sincerely, Shana PAUI. F.'. HRLE a 4 ), JAN L [uuc Y ��'�...—.ice /� •—��e �cP"x IIsun,Wd N.Y. .T.U. Form IMIn-ra" -Bupaln .nil s.I,Dred,.10 ('nvmmn eXfnn 6,. o1 ,A111-Wl0d-.M ur G,Mrrann. (dnRle lha 0 CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMEHT-THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY THIS INDENTURE, made the (lay of July , nineteen hundred and ninety-five BETWEEN PAUL E. HATE and ADELAIDE M. HALE, his wife, both residing at 5132 North Bayview Road, Southold, New York 11971, party of the first part,and PAUL E. HALE and ADELAIDE M. STALE, as tenants in comron without right of survivorship, both residing at 5132 North Bayview Road, Southold, New York 11971, party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable consideratiot paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heir:. or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate lying and being indbe at Southold, in the Ton of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being more particularly bounded and described on Schedule A annexed hereto and made a part hereof. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises as conveyed to the party of the DIST. first part by deed dated June 18, 1982, and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on June 22, 1982 in Liber 9200 Page 428. 1000 SEC. 079.00 BLOCK 02.00 LOT 006.000 TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets at roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenanc- and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND T HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anythi, whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party . the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consi oration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will app the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same f• any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this rotten tpre so recttir= IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first Rho written. 1N PRESENCE OF: Paul E. Hale Adelaide M. Hale STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY N' SUFFOLK SSI STATE OF N4 YORK, COUNTY OF S[7FOLK S On the day of July 19 95, before me On the day of July 19 95 , before n: personally came personally came Paul E. Hale Adelaide M. Hale to nle known to be the individual described in and who to file known to be the individual described in and wh executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged th= he executed the same. she executed the same. PaLll E. Hale Adelaide M. Hale STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF $SI STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF S On the day of 19before me On the da of personally came personal , ly came y 19 , before m to me known, who, being by file duly sworn, did depose and the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, will say that he resides at No. whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me dul° that lie is the sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. of that he'knows the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixedto be vidua described in and who executed the foregoing hnstrument to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subscribing witness, was present and sas affixed by order of the board of directors'of said corpora- execute the same; and that he, said witness tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto t�ttr ttin ttaa #air 1prrd WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS SECTION 'TITLE NO. BLOCK PAUL E. HALE and ADELAIDE M. HALE LOT TO COUNTY OR 'TOWN PAUL E. HALE and ADELAIDE M. HALE Recorded at Request of CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY STAND=30ARO TITLE UNDERWRITERS Return bT Mall to yERiverhead, & ANGEL, ESQS, EAM Street X ]MIPANV 11901 Zip No. W LLt.l LL O s Z O 0 O 2 0 O W N K s W U s N N_ ti W 7 a[ W N W aC SCHEDULE A ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Southold, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point the following two courses and distances from a monument on the Northwest side of North Bayview Road (a/k/a North Road to Bayview) at the Southeast corner of land of J. and A. Gagen, which said monument is 30.76 feet Northeast of a monument marking an angle point in said North Bayview Road: 1. North 42 degrees 19 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 203 . 13 feet; 2 . North 68 degrees 37 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 307 .90 feet to the point or place of beginning; RUNNING THENCE from said point of beginning, South 21 degrees 22 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 145 feet to the extreme Northerly end of an arc of a curve; THENCE along said arc of a curve bearing to the right in a general Westerly direction having a radius of 25 feet, a distance of 39. 28 feet to a monument; THENCE North 68 degrees 37 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 235. 00 feet to a monument and the extreme Easterly end of an arc of a curve; THENCE along an arc of a curve bearing to the left in a general Westerly direction having a radius of 101. 17 feet, a distance of 40. 0 feet to a monument; THENCE North 2 degrees 07 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 230. 69 feet to a monument; THENCE South 68 degrees 37 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 375. 00 feet to a point; THENCE South 21 degrees 22 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 40. 00 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH a non-exclusive right of way for the purpose of ingress to and egress from the above described land to and from North Bayview Road (a/k/a North Road to Bayview) , and also for the purpose of installation, maintenance and repair and replacement of public utility lines, pipes and conduits, above the surface, below the surface and on the surface of said right of way in such a manner so as not to interfere with the surface travel. Said right of way being bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the Northwest side of North Bayview Road (a/k/a North Road to Bayview) at a monument at the Southeast corner of land of J. and A. Gagen, which said monument is 32 .05 feet North of a monument marking an angle point in said road; RUNNING THENCE North 42 degrees 19 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 203 . 13 feet; THENCE North 68 degrees 37 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 307.90 feet to premises herein conveyed; THENCE along premises herein conveyed, South 21 degrees 22 minutes 19 seconds West a distance of 20 feet; THENCE South 68 degrees 37 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 303 .23 feet; THENCE South 42 degrees 19 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 208. 34 feet to the Northwest side of North Bayview Road (a/k/a North Road to Bayview) ; THENCE along the Northwest side of North Bayview Road (a/k/a North Road to Bayview) , North 21 degrees 22 minutes 10 seconds East a distance of 22 . 31 feet to the point or place of beginning of said right of way. TP-584 (8/94) New ck Stale Department of Taxation and Finance 0 For department use only Combined Real Property cc;xopy Transfer Gains Tax Affidavit Real Estate Transfer Tax Return Credit Line Mortgage Certificate See instructions P-584-1 before com lean this form. Please print orf e. the ule A - Informal on Relat nct to Conveyance (Transferorlgrantoo Name(If Individual;last, first, middle Inilao Social security number Hale, Paul E. and Adelaide M. I I 6ijmedn„u [3cwporuma VaIllng address ZIP code Federal employer Identification number UFann.sw [30th« 5132 North Bayview Road, Southold, NY 11971 1 (Transferee/grantee) Name(if Individual;last, first, middle inldeo Social security number Hale, Paul E. and Adelaide M. ®mdwldval ocapwuioo Melling address ZIP code Federal employer Idenlllicallon number or.m.r.ho [30th., 5132 North Bayview Road, Southold, NY 11971 Location and description of proparty conveyed Tex ma des[ nation Address City/Viiiage Town County Section Block Lot 79 2 6 5132 North Bayview Road Southold Southold Suffolk Type of properly conveyed (check applicable box) 1 ® 1 - 3 family house 5 ❑ Commercial/Industrial 2 ❑ Residential cooperative 6 ❑ Apartment building Dale of conveyance Percentage of real property 3 El Residential condominium 7 ❑ Office building 95 conveyed which Is m dential 4 ❑ Vacant land B El Other i reel property 11000 gryl month day year (see Instructions) Condition of conveyance (check all that apply) a. XConveyance of fee Interest I. —Conveyance which consists of a more k. —Contract assignment b. _Acquisition of a controlling Interest(stale change of Identity or form of ownership or I. —Option assignment or surrender percentage acquired 4y) organization m. _Leasehold assignment or surrender (attach Form TP584.1, Schedule F) n. _Leasehold grant c. _Tansler of a controlling Interest (stele 9, _Conveyance for which credit for tax 0. Conveyance of an easement percentage transferred �) previously paid will be claimed p. X Conveyance for which exemption from d. —Conveyance to cooperative housing (attach Form TP-584.1, Schedule 0) transfer tax Is claimed(complete corporation h. _Conveyance of cooperative aparlmenl(s) Schedule C, Pan ill) e. —Conveyance pursuant to or In lieu of I. _Syndication q. —Conveyance of property partly within and foreclosure or enforcement of security )• _Conveyance of air rights or development partly without the stele Interest(attach Form rf+584.1, Schedule E) rights r. _Other (describe) _ Schedule B - Real Prdperty 7 ansfer Gains Tax Affidavit (Article 31=B of the Tax Law) ❑ Check this box if a Tentative Assessment and Return Is being filed with respect to your current transfer, and proceed to Schedule C without completing the following affidavit. Also, enter the assessment number shown on the Tentative Assessment: I (we) certify that: (check appropriate box) 1 ❑ The transfer of real properly consists of the execution of a contract to sell real property without the use or occupancy of such properly or the granting of an option to purchase real properly without the use or occupancy of such property. 2 IJ The transfer Is a transfer of real properly where the consideration Is less than $500,000, and the transfer Is neither (A) pursuant to a cooperative or condominium plan, nor(B) a partial or successive transfer (i.e., a transfer [list Is one of a series of transfers of contiguous or adjacent Interests In real property e.g., subdivided parcels). 3 ❑ The transfer is a transfer of real properly by tenants in common, joint tenants or tenants by the entirely where the aggregate consideration Is less than $500,000. (ATI such transferors must sign this form.) 4 ❑ The conveyance Is not a transfer of real property within the meaning of section 1440.7 of Article 31-B of the Tax Law. (Attach documents supporting such claim, and sign on back as required.) 5 ❑ The transfer of real property consists of premises wholly occupied and used by the translator exclusively as his residence, Including a cooperative apartment or condominium occupied by ilia translator exclusively as a residence. (This exemption may only be claimed and attested to by a translator that Is an Individual, estate or trust.) 8 ❑ Tonsleror Is the stale of New York, or any of Its agencies, instrumentalities, political subdivisions, or public corporations, Including a public corporation created pursuant to an agreement or compact with another slate or Canada. 7 ❑ Transistor is the United Nations or any other International organization of which the United Slates Is a member, the United States of America or any of its agencies or Instrumentalities. Schedule C - Real Estate TYanafer Tax Return (Article 31 of the Tax Law) Part I - Computation of Tax Due 1 Enter amount of consideration for conveyance (It you are claiming a total exemption from tax, enter consideration andproceed to Part 111) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 0 2 Continuing Ilan deduction (see Instructions If property Is taken subject to mortgage or lien). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 Taxable consideration (subtract line 2 from line 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 _ 4 Tax due: $2 for each $500, or fractional part thereof, of consideration on line 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 0 5 Amount of credit claimed (see Instructions and attach Form TP-584,f, Schedule G). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 0 6 Total lax due' (subtract line 5 from line 4). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 0 Part 11 - Computation of Additional Tax Due on the Conveyance of Residential Real Property for $1 Million or More 1 Enter amount of consideratlon'for conveyance (from Part 1, line 1) . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 n/a _ 2 Taxable consideration (mulllplyJine 1 by the percentage of she premises which Is residential real propei r see Instructions) . 2 n/a 3 Total additional,Oanstertax'due',(10A!o/line 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 n/a *Please make check(s) payable to the county clerk where. the recording Is to lake place or if the recording Is to take place In New York City, make check(s) payable to the NYC Department o/Finance. If no recording Is required, send your check(s) made payable to the Department of Taxation and Finance, directly to the NYS Tex Department, MB-1tansfer Tax, P O Box 5045, Albany NY 12205-5045. For recoding olticer'e use Amount ' Part 1 S _ Dale received Trensacllon number received Part II S 1 Y-0041 (0/y41)(OBCx) Schedule C - continued — Part III - Explanation of Exemption Claimed In Part 1, line 1 (check any boxes that apply) The conveyance of real properly is exempt from lire real estate transfer tax for the following reason: a. Conveyance Is to the United Nations, the United Slates of America, the stale of New York or any of their Instrumentalities, agencies or political subdivisions (or any public corporation, including a public corporation created pursuant to agreement or compact with another stale or Canada). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ❑ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Conveyance Is to secure a debt or other obligation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b ❑ c. Conveyance Is without additional consideration to confirm, correct, modify or supplement a prior conveyance. . . . . . . . . . . . .c ❑ d. Conveyance of real property is without consideration and not in connection with a sale, Including conveyances conveying realtyas bona fide gills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d ❑ e. Conveyance is given in connection with a tax sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e ❑ I. Conveyance Is a mere change of Identify or form of ownership or organization where there Is no change in beneficial ownership. (This exemption cannot be claimed for a conveyance to a cooperative housing corporation of real properly comprising the cooperative dwelling or dwellings.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 g. Conveyance consists of deed of perillion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D It. Conveyance Is given pursuant to the federal bankruptcy act. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I. Conveyance consists of the execution of a contract to sell real property without the use or occupancy of such property or h ❑ the granling of an option to purchase real properly without Ilse use or occupancy of such properly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I ❑ j. Conveyance of an option or contract to purchase real properly with the use or occupancy of such property where the consideration Is less than $200,000 and such property was used solely by the grantor as his personal residence and consists of a 1., 2-, or 3-family house, a residential individual condominium unit, or the sale of stock in a cooperative housing corporation in connection with the grant or transfer or a proprietary leasehold covering an Individual residential cooperative unit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . k. Conveyance Is not a conveyance within the meaning of section 1401(e) of Article 31 of the Tax Lew(attach documents supporling such claim). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . k ❑ I. Other (elteclr explanation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Schedule D - Credit Line Mort a e Certificate Article 11 of the Tax Law Complete the following only If the Interest being transferred Is a lee simple Interest. I (we) certify that: (check appropriate box) 1 ❑ The real properly being sold or transferred is not principally Improved nor will 11 be Improved by a one- to six-family owner- occupied residence or dwelling. 2 ❑ The real property being sold or transferred Is not subject to an outstanding credit line mortgage. 3 i] The real property being sold or transferred Is subject to an outstanding credit line mortgage. However, an exemption from the tax Is claimed for the following reason. ❑ The transfer of real property Is a transler of a lee simple Interest to a person or persons who held a lee simple interest In the real properly (whether as a joint tenant, a tenant in common or otherwise) immediately prior to the transfer. ❑ The transfer of real properly Is (A) to a person or persons related by blood, marriage or adoption to the original obligor or to one or more of the original obligors or (8) to a person or entity where a majority of the beneficial Interest in such real property after the transfer Is held by the transferor or such related person or persons. ❑ The transfer of real property Is a transfer to a trustee In bankruptcy, a receiver, assignee or other officer of a court. ❑ Other (attach detailed explanation). 4 ❑ The real properly being transferred Is presently subject to an outstanding credit line mortgage. However, no tax Is due for the following reason: ❑ A certificate of discharge of the credit line mortgage Is being offered at the time of recording the deed. ❑ A check has been drawn payable for transmission to the credit line mortgagee or his agent for the balance due, and a satisfaction of such mortgage will be recorded as soon as It Is available. 5 ❑ The real property being transferred is subject to an outstanding credit line mortgage on record at (Insert liber and page or reel or other Identification of the mortgage). The maximum principal amount expressed in the mortgage Is . No exemption from tax Is claimed and the lax of being paid herewith. (Make check payable to county clerk where deed will be recorded or, if the recording Is to lake places ki New York City, make check payable to the NYC Department of Finance.) Signature and Affirmation (both the transferor(s)/grantor(s) and transferees)/grantee(s) must sign) The undersigned, being duly sworn, depose Deno under penalty of perjury that the above return, Including any ellldavll, certification, schedule ora ursuannt, hes been examined by the undersigned, and is, to the best of his/her knowledge, true and complete and made In good faith pursuant to Articles 11, 31 end 31-B of the New York Stale Tax Law. Translerodgranlor Title Paul E. Hale Paul E. ,Jranesferee/gramee nue Subscribed to and sworn before me a= �, 95 Subscribe and sworn before me Ihla y of 19 pZ i n/O V/. this day of 95 ire NEW YORK 1aEEN M.GUtATI Notar —� Slate of y Public,State of New Yolk Slate of 14134 YORK E A�IYQI No OIGUSOIS872 ----Notary Alf c,SIMe of NewYork County of W R Oua8fied In New York Count yy No.OIGUS01S872 Com 111410n Eapirer Augur12,19g County of --_ qualified in New York Count Reminder: Did you complete all of the required Information In Schedules A and B9 Were you required two Comp eter3 Schedules August Z C and D4 If you checked e, 1 and g In Schedule A, did you complete TP-584.19 Have you attached your check(e) made payable to the county clerk or city register where Mounting will lake place or, II the recording Is In New York City, to the NYC Department of Finance?If no recording Is required, send your check(s), made payable to the Department of 79xaf/on and Finance, directly to the NYS Tax Department, TTT811ransfer Tax, P 0 Box 5045, Albany NY 12205.0545. i 0 FOR COUNTY USE ONLY C1.SWIS Code I RE� R REPORT F NEW RK C2.Date Deed Recorded / / 1 STATE BOARD OF EOUALIZATI AND ASSESSMENT Month Day Yea, C3.Book I I , , I C4.Page I , EA - 5217 CA-5217R.,1194 2 I t;,- Ali. PROPERTY INFORMATION - --- --- 1.Property I 5132 I North Bayview Road Location B EET rAaME 6TREET NVAE Southold CITr OR Town I Southold I 11 1 wLLAOE 21P CODE 2.BuyerI Hale Paul E Name LAST E I COMPANY I FIRST Fusin Hale LA4T E I COMPNIY 1 Adelaide M. 1 FIRST NNIS 3.Tax Indicate where future Tax Bills are to be sent Billing if other than buyer address(al bottom of(am) I I I Address LAST NLME I COMPN1r FIRST KWE II I I I 6i EETI&WISER AND STREETNNAf CITY OR TWMI "AM 3VCODE 4.Indicate the number of Assessment1 ❑ (Only If Part of a Parcel)Check as they apply: Roll parcels transferred on the deed I I sof Parcels OR Part of a Parcel 40.Planning Board with Subdivision Authority Exists S.Deed 4B.Subdivision Approval"a Required for Transfer Property �^Er z �ORI 1 6 3 1 Size f FE RES 4C.Parcel Approved for Subdivision with Map Provided S.Seger I Hale Paul E Name UbrIVMAEICOh1PANV 1 FIRST NNAE Hale Adelaide M. NNIS I 'Mur I IRS NMeE 1 7.Check the box below which most accurately describes the use of the property at the time of sale: Check the boxes below as they apply: 0.Ownership Type is Condominium AM One Family Residential $ Agricultural I Community Service 9.New Construclion on Vacant Lend 13 2 or 3 Family Residential F Commercial J Industrial ICA.Property Located within an Agricultural District C Residential Vacant Land G Apartment K Public Service 108.Buyer received a disclosure notice indicating El❑ D Non-Residential Vacant Land H Entertainment/Amusement L Forest that the property Is in an Agricultural District SALE INFORMATION I16.Check one or more of these conditions as applicable to transfer: _ 11.Sale Contract Date I / n/a/ _-1 p Sale Between Relatives or Former Relatives Mone, Dry Year E Sale Between Related Companies or Partners in Business C One of the Buyers is also a Seller 12.Date of Sale/Transfer I / / 95 I D Buyer or Seller is Government Agency or Lending Institution Month Day Year E Dead Type not Warranty or Bargain and Sale(Specify Balm) F Sale of Fractional or Leas than Fee Interest(Specify Balm) 13.Full Sale Price 1 -o- I G Significant Change In Property Between Taxable Status and Sale Das if Sale of Business is Included In Sale Price (Full Sale Price is the total amount paid for the property including personal property. I Other Unusual Factors ABecling Sale Price(Specify Below) This payment may be In the form of cash.other property or goods,or the assumption Of I Nona mortgages or other obligations.) 14.indicate the value of personal 1 -0_ property Included In the sale 3 r ASSESSMENT INFORMATION - Data should reflect the latest Final Assessment Roll and Tax Bill 19.Year of Assessment Roll from which Information taken 19 . 5 117•Total Assessed Value (of all parcels in transfer)[ 7 9 n n I f r 18. Property Class 12 . 1 ,0 -U 19.School District Nam* I 473805 I 20.Tax Map Identlfier(s)I Roll Identifier(s) (If more than.four,attach sheet with additional Identifiers) 1 1000-079.00-02.00-006.000 I I 1 I CERTIFICATION -- I certify that All of the llems of farormNlon entered on(his form are[rue and carrect(lo the better my knowledge and better)and I understand that the making Of any willful false Flalenamt of material fact hercls wfU subject INC to the provhlons of Inn neral law relative to lite making and flung of false instmaximis. BUYER BUYER'S ATTORNEY BAYER bIONANRE I / /95 Hefter I Marcia Z. DAA u TNFME FIRST NxMF 5132 1 North Bayview Road 516 I 369-1700 STREn F&eIeER STREETNNAE MFTERSALEI AREA MOE TELEPNDNE M.MBEq SoutholdI NY I 11971 CITY OR TOWN STATE IIP CODE SELLER NEW YORK STATE COPY I / /95 /L1� ,��.v:✓err �.�Lo�;s , • -' "5- vz � /� � �/�o pY►� u 4 [UUI s�irTloG , �riy �i g �� Southold Town Planning Board 7 tir ��.�'uCe..��Gz-ems—��� �/��' ��.✓.�;z�u. _-��_�-/,.��� L • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �o�pgpFFO(,�co BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box 1179 Chairman O Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 O WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDS $L • ,F Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGERICHAR CIE LATHAM,JR AGGI O y'7�1 �aO� Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 19, 2002 Mr. Richard Lark, Esq. Lark&Folts 28785 Main Road—P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, New York 11935-0973 Re: Major Subdivision Forestbrook at Bayview SCTM #1000-79-2-7 Dear Mr. Lark: The Town of Southold Planning Department is requiring a Phase I Archeological Survey of the above referenced property on recommendation of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. No seasonal constraints have been placed on the implementation of the study. A copy of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation's March 6, 2002 letter outlining the protocols is attached. Please contact this office with any questions. Sincerely, Mark Terry Senior vironmental Planner Enclosure Cc: Town of Southold Planning Board Town of Southold Town Board MAR-12-2002 11:12 • NELSON & POPE,LLP 516 427 5620 P.10i11 $ New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation p3p Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau a b NEW YOATE L Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 Bernadeae Castro Commissioner Marcb 6,2002 Shana M.Lacey Nelson,Pope&Voorhis,LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville,New York 11747-2188 Dear Ms.Lacey: Re: SEORA ForestbrookBayview/SCTM#1000-79-02-07 Southold,Suffolk County 02PRI000 Thank you for requesting the comments of the Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation(OPRHP)concerning your project's potential impact/effect upon historic and/or prehistoric cultural resources. Our staff has reviewed the documentation that you provided on your project Preliminary comments and/or requests for additional information are noted on separate enclosures accompanying this letter. A determination of impactleffect will be provided only after ALL documentation requirements noted on any enclosures have been met. Any questions concerning our preliminary comments and/or requests for additional information should be directed to the appropriate staff person identified on each enclosure. In cases where a state agency is involved in this undertaking,it is appropriate for that agency to determine whether consultation should take place with OPRHP under Section 14.09 of the New York State Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation Law. In addition,if there is any federal agency involvement, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations,"Protection of Historic and Cultural Properties" 36 CFR 800 requires that agency to initiate consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (S14PO). When responding,please be sure to refer to the OPRHP Project Review(PR)number noted above. Sincerely, Ruth L. Pierpont Director RLP:bsd Enclosure(s) An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency 0 P,mw 00 recycled paper MAR-12-2002 11:13 • NELSON 8 POPE,LLP • 516 427 5620 P. 11/11 r ARCHEOLOGY COMMENTS 02PR1000 Based on reported resources, there is an archeological site in or adjacent to your project area. Therefore the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) recommends that a Phase 1 archeological survey is warranted for all portions of the project to involve ground disturbance, unless substantial prior ground disturbance can be documented. If you consider the project area to be disturbed, documentation of the disturbance will need to be reviewed by OPRHP. Examples of disturbance include mining activities and multiple episodes of building construction and demolition. A Phase 1 survey is designed to determine the presence or absence of archeological sites or other cultural resources in the project's area of potential effect. The Phase 1 survey is divided into two.progressive units of study including a Phase IA sensitivity assessment and initial project area field inspection, and a Phase 1B subsurface testing program for the project area. The OPRHP can provide standards for conducting cultural resource investigations upon request. Cultural resource surveys and survey reports that meet these standards will be accepted and approved by the OPRHP. Our office does not conduct cultural resources surveys. A 36 CFR 61 qualified archeologist should be retained to conduct the Phase I survey. Many archeological consulting firms advertise their availability in the yellow pages. The services of qualified archeologists can also be obtained by contacting local, regional, or statewide professional archeological organizations. Phase 1 surveys can be expected to vary in cost per mile of right-of-way or by the number of acres impacted. We encourage you to contact a number of consulting firms and compare examples of each firm's work to obtain the best product. Documentation of ground disturbance should include a description of the disturbance with confirming evidence. Confirmation can include current photographs and/or older photographs of the project area which illustrate the disturbance (approximately keyed to a project area map), past maps or site plans that accurately record previous disturbances, or current soil borings that verify past disruptions to the land. Agricultural activity is not considered to be substantial ground disturbance and many sites have been identified in previously cultivated land. If you have any questions concerning archeology, please call Mike Schifferli at (518) 237-8643 ext. 3281. M_ Schifferli 03/01/02 TOTAL P. 11 MRR-12-2002 11:09 NELSON & POPE,LLP 516 427 5620 P.01i11 NELSON. POPE 6 fA /lr VOORHIS, LL / I EI�IVIFIZ;-5 A' F�MJfVUVG • CONSULTING 572 WlyT WHITMAN Rpgp,M�.IVILLE, NY 747 -2i BB (6313 a275as5 FAX 1621) 627-2:520 1 nP�anCIBOnpppe,00m FAX COVER SHEET To: Victor LaPlatnea Far 765-1823 From: Shana Lacey Date: March 11,2002 Re: NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Correspondence No. of Pages: 12 (including Cover) Comments: Victor, Attached please find the correspondence from NYS OPRHP with regard to archaeological and historical sensitivity on the following HP 1. Zoumas, Bayview 3. MaTine, Greenport 4. Skrezic, Peconic 5. Mattituck Housing, Mattituck Please feel free to call should you have any questions or require any additional information. Sincerely, Shana MAR-12-2002 11: 12 NELSON & POPE,LLP 516 427 5620 P.10i11 �� . $ New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation s >. Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau NEW rowtSTATE $ Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8543 Bernadette Oasim commissioner March 6,2002 Shana M.Lacey Nelson,Pope&Voorhis,LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville,New York 11747-2188 Dear Ms. Lacey! Re: SEORA ForestbrookBayview/SCTM#1000-79.02-07 Southold,Suffolk County 02PRIO00 Thank you for requesting the comments of the Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation(OPRHP)concerning your project's potential impact/effect upon historic and/or prehistoric cultural resources, Our staff has reviewed the documentation that you provided on your project. Preliminary comments and/or requests for additional information are noted on separate enclosures accompanying this letter. A determination of impact/effect will be provided only after ALL documentation requirements noted on any enclosures have been met. Any questions concerning our preliminary comments and/or requests for additional information should be directed to the appropriate staff person identified on each enclosure. In cases where a state agency is involved in this undertaking,it is appropriate for that agency to determine whether consultation should take place with OPRHP under Section 14.09 of the New York State Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation Law. In addition,if there is any federal agency involvement, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations,"Protection of Historic and Cultural Properties" 36 CFR 800 requires that agency to initiate consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). When responding,please be sure to refer to the OPRHP Project Review(PR)number noted above. Sincerely, .PLL F V�+ Ruth L.Pierpont Director RLP:bsd Enclosure(s) An Equal Opportunity/Atrinnavve Action Agency 4 Pdnted on neyded paper MAR-12-2002 11:13 NELSON & POPE,LLP 516 427 5620 P.liill ARCHEOLOGY COMMENTS 02PR1000 Based on reported resources, there is an archeological site in or adjacent to your project area. Therefore the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) recommends that a Phase 1 archeological survey is warranted for all portions of the project to involve ground disturbance, unless substantial prior ground disturbance can be documented. If you consider the project area to be disturbed, documentation of the disturbance will need to be reviewed by OPRHP. Examples of disturbance include mining activities and multiple episodes of building construction and demolition. A Phase 1 survey is designed to determine the presence or absence of archeological sites or other cultural resources in the project's area of potential effect. The Phase 1 survey is divided into two.progressive units of study including a Phase IA sensitivity assessment and initial project area field inspection, and a Phase 1B subsurface testing program for the project area. The OPRHP can provide standards for conducting cultural resource investigations upon request. Cultural resource surveys and survey reports that meet these standards will be accepted and approved by the OPRHP. Our office does not conduct cultural resources surveys. A 36 CFR 61 qualified archeologist should be retained to conduct the Phase 1 survey. Many archeological consulting firms advertise their availability in the yellow pages. The services of qualified archeologists can also be obtained by contacting local, regional, or statewide professional archeological organizations. Phase 1 surveys can be expected to vary in cost per mile of right-of-way or by the number of acres impacted. We encourage you to contact a number of consulting firms and compare examples of each firm's work to obtain the best product. Documentation of ground disturbance should include a description of the disturbance with confirming evidence. Confirmation can include current photographs and/or older photographs of the project area which illustrate the disturbance (approximately keyed to a project area map), past maps or site plans that accurately record previous disturbances, or current soil borings that verify past disruptions to the land. Agricultural activity is not considered to be substantial ground disturbance and many sites have been identified in previously cultivated land. If you have any questions concerning archeology, please call Mike Schifferli at (518) 237-8643 ext. 3281. M. Schifferli 03/01/02 TOTRL P. 11 Mr. Bennett Orlowski. Jr. Lawrence and Diane Walser Chairman, Planning Dept. 4760 North Bayview Rd. Southold Town Southold, N.Y., 11971 Southold Town Hall February 12, 2002 53095 Main Rd. Southold, N.Y., 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski and Members of the Board: We are year-round residents of Southold , residing at the property designated SCTM# 1000-79-.02-4.2. We are concerned about the potential environmental impact of the proposed subdivision of SCTM# 1000-79-.02-7,reported to be entitled Forestbrook Homes at Bayview. Among our concerns are the following: 1. Wetland present on and adjacent to that property. 2. Water runoff and erosion onto-adjacent properties due to the land contour. 3. Water runoff into nearby Goose Creek. 4. The effect of multiple homes on the water table including water availability and seepage of sewage. 5. Flora and fauna issues, as this land is a sanctuary and.breeding ground for innumerable species. 6. Traffic issues, and therefore safety issues on already over-utilized roadways. 7. The Planning Board's long-term vision of what will and will not be permitted on the Hog Neck Peninsula, in view of the rapidly shrinking open land space. Thank you for your attention , please feel free to contact us if we can assist you in any way. Sincerely, ez cc. Ms. Valerie Scopaz f tri i 52092 Southold Town Ply BMd PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� 0(� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman = y� P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J. CREMERS h Z, Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDS . Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Fax (631) 765-3136 y�O! �aO� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE February 11, 2002 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Richard Lark, Esq. Lark &Folks Main Road, PO Box 973 Cutchogue, New York 11935 Re: Forestbrook at Bayview Major Subdivision SCTM# 1000-79-2-7 Completion of Revised Environmental Assessment Form Section D. Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative Dear Mr. Lark: Water supply and quality within the Town of Southold is a serious community issue. Public water supply, although provided by the Suffolk County Water Authority, is determined through the current and projected use of the community. To date, the supply does not meet the demand,however, water use is controlled by an individuals' actions and can often be mitigated through numerous water conservation measures implemented during the planning process. Water quality is very difficult to control. Although point source pollution can usually be traced to its origin, non-point source pollution is boundless and one of the largest threats to local environmental and community health. Non-point source pollution has been identified as the primary cause of water quality degradation in more than 90 percent of New York State's impaired water bodies. In the Town of Southold, localized well and surface water contamination already exists. Consequently, the Town of Southold Planning Board in cooperation with the Suffolk County Water Authority now requires the completion and submittal of the attached Environmental Assessment Form, Section D. Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative as part of the SEQR review process. Until a completed Environmental Assessment Form, Section D. Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative is submitted, applications will be considered incomplete and the SEQR review will not proceed. Sincerely Bennett rlowski Jr. Chairman Enclosure a j • • D. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS AND WATER SUPPLY NARRATIVE REQUEST Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated withyour proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. I. Provide explanation of existing site use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use; compare to proposed use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use. 2. Indicate the source of water supply, nearest public water main, nearest public well field, and adjacent private wells (if known). 3. If public water supply is proposed,indicate the ability of the water utility to provide water supply to the project. Provide letter of water availability or detailed explanation of status of review by water utility. 4. If private water supply is proposed, indicate the well specifications, water quality based on on-site water quality data. Provide Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval or detailed explanation of status of review by agency. 5. Indicate proposed water conservation measures that will mitigate for unavoidable adverse impacts (If any). Conservation measures should include,but not be limited to: a. The use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping. b. The preservation of existing native vegetative buffers. c. The conservation of existing open space areas. d. The implementation of"natural' stormwater management practices (grass swales, filter strips,created wetlands, etc...). E. VERIFICATION I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Date Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 6 * • RECEIVED , Tq 3v STOP DEVELOPMENT AND THE DESTRUCTION OF WOODLANDS F f3 FEB 1 1 2002 FC" ° ate '. i l(SECTION 79, BLOCK 02, LOT 07) (Y T ZOUMAS SUBDIVISION (SECTION 79, BLOCK 04, LOTS 17. 17 & 17. 14) Southold Town Corte the undersigned oppose the above mentioned proposed major subdivisions due to the negative impact that they will have on local wildlife, schools, roads, beaches and water supply. We encourage the Town to aggressively employ it's resources toward the preservation of these parcels and other woodland areas. o Wti 64-�--Ak, 1'4-v�L G ' c 9 � AuaN t 3dfl,4 C 7 to �V )N G K-- IV D J5E: LvbDI 4A So Lr y O TC A6 aa Sar I 1 f1 t�71 �U RECEIVED • • c c -7a STOP DEVELOPMENT AND THE DESTRUCTION OF WOODLANDS ?A FEB 1 1 -20024108 FORESTBROOK SUBDIVISION (SECTION 79, BLOCK 02, LOT 07) ZOUMAS SUBDIVISION (SECTION 79, BLOCK 04, LOTS 17. 17 & 17. 14) authold Town C18rI:We the undersigned oppose the above mentioned proposed major subdivisions due to the negative impact that they will have on local wildlife, schools,roads, beaches and water supply. We encourage the Town to aggressively employ it's resources toward the preservation of these parcels and other woodland areas. Of 110-71 oo �V Q Lin?lam 1S to Cyt I SYS ��/tet 3 ��Dfll2- 75 Snk d b �°GE�Jw� Y r 3t,47`E>4Qcp .fj„ 2 y � L v `� • �►i 1/26/02 Souutholthol d Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Attn: Joshua Horton Town Su ervisor ale copes Town Plann v Subject: FORESTBROOK SUBDIVISION AND ZOUMAS SUBDIVISION These two subdivisions are another indication of poor town planning. You should take a trip to Medford NJ a rural farm area where lots of homes have been built. The homes are not put on 2&5acre plots,but the builders are required to put in playgrounds,parks,walks,large streets with sidewalks etc.With the building that is going on in our area you can no longer just maintain a Waal setting.You have to adjust. You can't have your cake and eat it. Take a good look at the Map attached. In only one area have the homeowners given back one acre for each home built on for open space. In my area there are 15 homes that have not given any thing back to open space,which would be an additional 10— 12 acres. In the areas next to these two proposed subdivision's no one gave any space back. This would amount to over 150 acres. If you will drive over to Hogs Neck Bay you will find practically no open space, and the area&homes over run with deer.Everyone wants open space,but that cost money. Some people even like open space to dump there yard waste in. Why go to the dump as they should do.. Where will all the deer go(in my back yard the herd is over 30)when these two sub divisions go in? Is the builder going to be required to remove all of them to upstate NY? Is he going to be required along with the other home owners to widen all of Bay view Road with sidewalks etc so you can safely go for a walk... Is he going to put one acre per home back into open space as 7 of my neighbors did on Bay view road?If he does not,my neighbors with 15 acres will sell and move and the town will lose another 12 acres of open space. The town has money for a Roller Hockey Rink but none for the Sr. Citizens Home. Instead of upgrading the dog pound in small amounts you went to outside contractors. The new schools went way over budget. The police dept wants more as does everyone else. The taxes go up and up but for those of us in the private sector our disposable income goes down. Those in the public sector get more and seem to think there is always more money around and if not bond it. The results always appear to be the same. Not anything to brag about. Something is wrong with our towns planning and it appears you have inherited a mess of problems. Here is an opportunity to take a stand. Maybe you should buy the property or just not issue a p since there are some series issues like"water"and the environment impact. GG�L Larrgr� --Goose Creek ne 1.7 Acre(1 acre open space)east of Forestbrook D 1 2 9 2061 D [ O d D SoudiddTown 2927 f Planning Board J SUPERVISORS C�FICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1 Rp, I � ��L UMBI4� � aA � a ^ i � � •,,�/ r a ' ap so• :' F '�. � (Nn r r sr'rrpLGfG Y O e " t 3 mQ LA. ^. LW i Mr. Michael Fouchet, Jr. 1075 Ships Dr. Southold, NY 11971 631-765-6018 Mr. Mark Terry, Town Planner January 21, 2002 Southold Town Hall Main Rd. Southold, NY, 11971 Dear Mr. Terry: I am writing to you about all of the wooded areas in our town that are being torn down so houses can be built. For example, behind my house, my parents have told me that there will be about 20 houses built in the woods. One of my concerns is that kids will not have any place to go to play and explore nature and wildlife. Another concern is that the animals will have no place to go and no place to live. Some of the animals that I am used to seeing around my house are: a lot of deer, squirrels, turtles, rabbits, owls, birds, raccoons, possums and my dad has even seen a fox. If developers keep building so many houses all at once in one place we will see a major decrease in wildlife. This makes me sad because wildlife and nature is one of the cool things about growing up in Southold. I think the town should try and buy this land and preserve it just like they are doing with farmland. It seems like all of the preservation seems to be about farmland and nobody seems to be doing anything about the wooded areas. I hope that you will consider this letter while making decisions about whether or not the woods can be torn down. Thank you for your time. Since" 0 V Michael Fouchet, Jr. JAF JAN G 4"Innn BoudxAd Town Phnnirg Board STEPHEN MILA �6 1 255 GOOSE CREEK LANE f P.O. BOX 1696 (631)7656285 fyll SOUTHOLD, NY 1 1971 FAX 765-1711 1/3/2002 Joshua Horton Southold Town Supervisor _ Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 PO Box 1 179 Southold,NY 11971 n' RE: Proposed Major Subdivisions at Bayview FEB G 7 2002 Section 79,Block 02, Lot 07 ounias- Section 79,Block 04,Lots 17.17& 17.14 SoudlowTowl Dear Mr. Horton, Congratulations on your stunning victory and welcome as our new Town Supervisor. My wife and I have made Southold our 41 vacation and weekend destination for 15 years and have had the pride and pleasure to call it home for the past year now. I am concerned and saddened by the prospect of the above mentioned proposed subdivisions. Living on Great Hog Neck I can attest to the strains of development and overcrowding on our area's wildlife, roads and beaches as well as the fragile and limited water supply. The addition of these nearly 40 new homes and the development of these parcels totaling over 80 acres will only add to the problems. I understand and agree with the priority placed on preservation of farmland and the farming way of life in Southold Town. At the same time, I encourage that the preservation of woodlands and wetlands be viewed with the same urgency. Among other things, these areas provide habitat to a great variety of residents and migrating visitors that predate not only the founding farmers but the Corchaugs as well. The subject lots are host to a tremendous number of these "locals". I know that you will be seeking a workable, balanced, solution to the preservation of Southold's greatness, and uniqueness on Long Island, in the form of revised laws effecting zoning and development. During this interim time, I hope that any proposed developments will be held to the highest, uncompromising, standard of compliance with all laws and policies currently on the books. I also hope that all resources, human and economic, will be aggressively employed to continue the town's Land Preservation programs with respect to staying potential developments. I am confident that you, now as chief steward of the town's future, along with the other elected officials and the team being assembled, will have the vision and fortitude to navigate safe passage through this critical juncture in Southold history. I thank you in advance for your time and consideration of my views. Sincerely, Stephen Milgri Southold Resident Albert J. Krupski, President Town Hall James King,Vice-President �gpFFO(,�c 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster =,r0 ®R P.O. Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda O % Southold, New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson CA Z Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman FROM: Albert J. Krupski, President DATE: January 2, 2002 ,AL,�y� RE: Forestbrook at Bayview ate+ SCTM#1000-79-2-7 JAN 0 3 24dy Southold 'l-own This Board has no interest in assuming lead agency. i , ;tilcCl031+ LARK & FOLTS V Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD-P.O.BOX 973 CUTCHOCUE,NEW YORK 11935-0973 ----'------------------- Tele.No.(631)734-6807 Fax No. (631)734-5651 RICHARD F. LARK MARY LOU FOLTS December 24 , 2001 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE : Applicant - Forestbrook Builders Inc . Agent - Lark & Folts, Esqs . Major Subdivision for Forestbrook at Bayview (SCTM #1000-79-2-7) Dear Mr. Orlowski : In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing four prints of the revised Yield Map and Cluster Sketch Plan both dated September 27, 2001 so the Board can start the lead agency coordination process . Very truly yours, =) 7 Richard F. Lark RFL/bd Enclosures DEC 2 b 2001 Southold Town Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Q BENNETT Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chaairirmmanan KI,JR. O.Z. Gyp P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J. CREMERS N Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS 51 • �� Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 18, 2001 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Forestbrook at Bayview. SCTM#1000-79-2-7 Requested Action: Proposed Maior Subdivision: 17 lots on 37.77 acres SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (X) Unlisted Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman (631) 765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request Planning Board Position: ( X ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: The Planning Board is conducting the review under SEQRA prior to making a determination on the yield or on the layout of the proposed cluster subdivision. A cluster layout is preferred to a standard layout. However, the particular layout that is being proposed is not necessarily the layout that would mitigate potential environmental impacts. Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: p' Board of Trustees Building Department Southold Town Board 'A Suffolk County Department of Health Services * NYSDEC - Stony Brook A Suffolk County Water Authority 'Maps are enclosed for your review „ 14-16-2 (9/95)-7c 617.20 SEAR. Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant.The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provide guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not th impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: M Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting Information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each Impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that S] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a, declaration will be prepared. • A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Forestbrook at Bayview , Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print orType Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer May 22, 2001 Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMA)!ON Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe on the envirogment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consider as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol- new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and speci each instance. _ FLOCATION CTION brook at Bayview OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County)orth Bayview Road, SoutholdTown of Southold, County of S BUSNESSTELEPHONEffolk, New rk APPLICANTISPONSOR t(j31 ) 774-5790 brook Builders Inc.y Lane STATE ZIP CODE NY 11780 _ St. James BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER(If different) - ( 631) 435-8585 Mary Grace Dougherty et al. ADDRESS c/o Martin Silver, Esq. , 330 Motor Parkway, Suite 201 STATE ZIP CODE CITYIPO NY 111788 Hauppauge DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivision of 37.771 acres of land on the northerly side of North Bayview Road, Southold, New York (SCTM #1000-079.00-02.00-007.000) into 17 building parcels. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential(suburban) ❑Rural(non-f- 1. IDAgdculture . ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 37.771 acres. PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETIO APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) -0- acres 8.8 acr- . 37.7 acres 2_ 8.8� acr- Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) -0- acres -0.1 acr acr Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0.1 acres i — Water Surface Area -0- acres -�_-- acr Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) -0- acres -0- acr Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces -0- acres 2.5acr Other (indicate type) lawns and landscaping -0- acres6_4— acr 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Plymouth loamy sand a. Soil drainage: MWell drained 95 % of site UModerately well drained , 3 % of site ®Poorly drained 2 % of site b. If any agricultural land Is involve how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 throNgh 4 of th Land Classification System? NA acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes ®No a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet) 2 S. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: no-10% 95 % 010-15% 3 ®15% or greater 2 % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes ®No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑yes XDNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-32 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes ®No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes UNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plantor animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? OYes ®No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)- Dyes IXINo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes MNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Oyes ®No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N/A 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name N/A b. Size (In acres) N/A 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? 8]Yes ONo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? OYes %)No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ISYes ONo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? OYes 13No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Oyes ®No ' 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? OYes ®No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 37.771 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 37.771 acres initially; 37.771 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped —0— acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing None ;.proposed None .. g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 15 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially —0— —0— —0— —0— Ultimately 17 —0— —0— —0- 1. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 35 r height' 40' width; 60' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?1,612 ft. 3 2. How much natural material, rock, earth, etc.) will be removed fromk site? -0- tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Dyes ONo UN/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? N/A b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONo N/A c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONo N/A 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed4rom site? 8.9 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes ®No 6. if single phase project: Anticipated period of construction -0- months, (including demolition). 7. if multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Oyes IDNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10 ; after project is complete -0- 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project -0- 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? OYes ®No If yes, explain _ 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes EJNo ---- a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount N/A b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? f9Yes ONo Type Sanitary _- 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes 17No Explain N/A 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes $]No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? MYes ONo a. If yes, what is the amount per month 5.6 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? 13Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name Southold Transfer Station location Cutchogue, New York d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? )Dyes ONo e. If Yes, explain Materials removed from the waste stream for re-use and for recvclina_ 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes SINo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? N/A tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? N/A years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes MNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes E3No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes UNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? f21Yes ONo If yes , indicate type(s) LIPA 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 5,100 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Oyes S)No If Yes, explain N/A 4 -� 2S. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board dYes ®No City, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes ONo Major Subdivision 5/22/01 City, Town Zoning Board Oyes ®No City, County Health Department ®Yes ONo Article 6 — Water Supply Unknown Other Local Agencies Oyes ®No and sewage disposal Other Regional Agencies OYes ®No State Agencies OYes ®No federal Agencies Oyes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? dYes ONo If Yes, indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment Ozoning variance Ospecial use permit Usubdivision Osite plan Onew/revision of master plan Oresource management plan Oother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? A — C (Agricultural—Conservation) 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Seventeen one—family dwellings 4. ,What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? )OYes ON 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/ mile radius of proposed action? Residential & Agricultural; A — C and R-40 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/ mile? UYes ON 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land; how many lots are proposed? —_ 17 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 38,006 sq. ft. 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? OYes KIN 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, polis fire protection)? 13Yes ONo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? 8)Yes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? OYes' ®N• a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? OYes ONo N/A D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adver- impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Spoigor N me Forestbrook Builders Inc. Date 5/22/01 Signature cio Title on Secretary By: nt u a If the action is in a Coastal Area, and you are a state agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceedir with this assessment. 5 i • Post Office Box 1732 800 Goose Creek Lane lee) Southold, NY 11971 IZ December 12, 2001 Uip"IS Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski, I wish to add my name to those who are questioning the desirability(and legality) of allowing extensive housing construction to proceed on Hog Neck in the vicinity of North Bayview and Jacobs Lane. I live nearby on Goose Creek Lane, adjacent to one of the proposed developments. The area consists of woods and/or open fields that are gradually growing into wooded terrain. Wildlife is well supported in these woods and fields. While I have no objection to individual houses being built as long as the rural character of the area is maintained, it is clear that extensive development would greatly diminish or even extinguish the wildlife population and lead to further"suburbanization" of Southold. The effect on the water table and waste clearing ability of the land also has to be considered. Based on existing zoning statutes, surely the Planning Board should be able to find ways of stopping these egregious proposals. Please do your utmost in this matter. Thank you. y cerely, /V, --"� Z, ;' xtlz� Howard Eilenberg r@•4'R DEC '0 2Uui Southoid Teem i 1 Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: O vr»yS Cr �7�EJ .�JC � /�y Subject: Co /Afl ,/i'EcJ � SCTI►r#: 1000- '7 79- a - 7 Date: 7 q!_ r> Q o./-7 /aIlN/o t Comments: --17C—r, o� DEC 17 2Q01 Southold Town Planning Board __- ScT�� l c� e C Q oi- - . . .. � '. _.. J•V' .�4�`�SS.'� .7�.?szO�u�Y1�ltT�. �a.s,�'Ir�,v..�P-_.. eG-- 7435 tlAtAJ _ S0 t oL�� of S1, lly7j J2 .V o.crw ?..y✓c� /D 0•.r 3Sy^ .. ._ C 600SC—cic LA , S 0u7i()L,� �. e_ i 13 Z-6 .a7 zra��7'Jv�e GZQ oCcz•r�e �T� uG/OE (' ✓ is /A L,/ lam' 14 On R r: RECEIVED om EC DEC 14 2001 (SL 7 2001 wurnotrs Southold Town 'own Clerk Planning-board \CM 'O?q �1L�t�tg.D L-A"�-� F'IA\1�1 'F•oi49 'gyp c�-73 C.l}TGtbV4.r- t3K \\a3S (9 Z 3K- (oe0-i �` H F2TZ VA`.l9ik\r, SGo�p, Z 50��o�'p '►yet, \\°\"11 t-Ar\p "`'RuS'T it Zoe t�ks co��.kc�r\�yc� cn��, VI �D vo�c 3 b ��vt�.�r�p� NY I1�101 'R�04. Owr�, �f�►.1 ZovYlPcS i' t 1 1 V.� �c•57o /1 C(:z ScT1vt ,/��- � 5C- TM i 'i ,. icy,, ,�/_ _ .�•�. �e`�essn_ -��ZoSS��h�T�C-_ -77o„�y,��_ Z IT (. -�_ aieG C '(� �?asJcc�rr� — d -4, �0 n _ �ESLEy R )ctZt+�SoJ 7G3S +'l Ater $A�/Jf�✓ �-D 614r _ .___ � _oil� � 6. fr�ats vsn+o 1 9-7 Ou�1002 /v r - r __. �v fi``"t _�iIG�. G-G L2 i-LL �'c�v�J��PL`Ze� aC4Y y� �?)yGfi/0�:�t✓�/` ONE LL� r4 74, IV if RECEIVED 30 pr1J ._ DEC 14 2001 a, *u+rrnoaa town Clerk j_ Albert J. Krupski, President • �gUFFU(�- • Town Hall James King, Vice-President �N, CSO 53095 Route 25 Henry Smith P.O.Box 1179 �✓ Artie Foster o Southold, New York 11971-09 9 H Ken Poliwodax O yC Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman e- t FROM: Albert J. Krupski, President DATE: December 17, 2001 ol:c r a 200 RE: Forestbrook at Bayview SCTM#1000-79-2-7 Southold Town Planning Board The Southold Town Board of Trustees visited the site on December 12, 2001 and inspected the irrigation pond, adjacent wetlands, and proposed recharge area. A 100' buffer should be provided for the adjacent wetlands pond, as they and the adjoining areas are important habitat corridors. No wetland indicators were observed in the recharge area, so this Board has no objection to it being used as proposed. LARK & FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD-P.O.BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935-0973 Tele.No.(631)734-6807 I Fax No. (631)734-5651 RICHARD F. LARK MARY LOU FOLTS December 13 , 2001 Ms . Valerie Scopaz Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P. O . Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE : Applicant - Forestbrook Builders Inc . Agent - Lark & Folts, Esqs . Major Subdivision for Forestbrook at Bayview (SCTM #1000-79-2-7) Dear Ms . Scopaz : I am enclosing an amended Part 1 of the Full Environmental Assessment Form in compliance with your letter of September 11, 2001 . It is my understanding the $500 . 00 additional fee has been paid and the Yield Map corrected. Per our conversation and your request I spoke to Mr. Voorhis and he informed me to go ahead with obtaining the water availability letter from the Suffolk County Water Authority and subdivision approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services . Mr. Hurtado is in the process of doing same . Very truly yours, _ v kichard F. Lark RFL/bd Enclosure Uri BE 1 2061 Southold Town Planning, Board a4=16-2 (9195)-7c • 617.20 • SEQR a' — Appendix A Slate Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ® Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ID A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result In one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Forestbrook at Bayview Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) May 22, 2001 Date *ART 1—PROJECT :NFORMP .I Prepared by Projct Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining w? ether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A t' rough E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to furt'.er verification and public review. Provide any additiona! information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 ant 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring su h additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specif•, each instance. NAME OF ACTION Forestbrook at Bayview LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and Counly) 5250 North Bayview Road, Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk,BUS NESS TELEPHONE York NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR (631 ) 774-5790 Forestbrook Builders Inc. ADDRESS 3 Penny Lane STATE ZIP CODE CITYIPO NY 11780 St. James BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER of different) ( (731) 435-8585 Mar Grace Dougherty et al. ADDRESS c/o Martin Silver, Esq. , 330 Motor Parkway, Suite 201 STATE ZIP CODE CITrrPO NY 11788 Hauppauge DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivision of 37 .771 acres of land on the northerly side of North Bayview Road, Southold, New York (SCTM 1I1000-079.00-02.00-007.000) into 17 building parcels. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: OUrban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential(suburban) Mural(non-farr MForest E3Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 37.771 acres. PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION APPROXIMATE ACREAGE -0- acres -0- acres Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested 37.7 acres 2�---- acres -0- -0- acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres �----- Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0. 1 acres 0.1 — acres Water Surface Area -0- acres _-0_-- acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) -0- acres ?cre_ -=-- Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces -0- acres �— acres Other (Indicate typel lawns and landscaping -0- acres 6.4 — acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Plymouth loamy sand a. Soil drainage: MWell drained _5 % of site 70Moderately well drained ,3 % of site ®Poorly drained 2 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involve how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the i Land Classification System? N�A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? OYes ®No a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet 2 5—Approximate percentage of prof *oject site with slopes. no-10% _ % ($10-15% 3 % ®15% or greater 2 % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? OYes ®No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes X3N0 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-32 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes ONO 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? OYes UNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Oyes ONO According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) - OYes ONO Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes 99No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes ONO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N/A 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Unknown b. Size (In acres) N/A 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? %3Yes ONO Vacant, adjacent to property a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? OYes ONO b) if Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Byes ONO 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? OYes BNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? OYes ®No • 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? OYes ®No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 37.771 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 37.771 acres initially; 37.771 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped —0— acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. 'If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A g6� f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing None ; proposed None g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 15 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially —0— —0— —0— —0— Ultimately 17 —0— —0— —0- 1. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 351 height; 40' width; 60' length. J. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?1,612 ft, 3 _ 2 How much natural materia' ck, earth, etc.) will be removed from 0te? -0_ tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ONo ]O N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? N/A b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Oyes ONo N/A c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONo N/A 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed-from site? 8.9 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? OYes ®No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction -0- months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ❑No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes %]No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10 ; after project is complete -0- 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project -0- 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? OYes ®No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes KINo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount N/A b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Oyes ONo Type Sanitary 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? OYes UNo Explain N/A 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? OYes $]NO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ®Yes ONo a. If yes, what is the amount per month 5.6 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Z)Yes ONo c. If yes, give name Southold Transfer Station ; location Cutchogue New York d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? UYes ONo e. If Yes, explain Materials removed from the waste stream for re-use and for recycling- 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Oyes 13No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? N/A tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? N/A years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Oyes ®No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes ONo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes S]No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? t$Yes ONo If yes , indicate type(s) LIPA - 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 5,100 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve local. State or federal funding? OYes VNo If Yes, explain N/A 4 R-5.-Approvals Required: . • Submittal Type Dale City, Town, Village Board Oyes ®No City, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes ONO Major Subdivision 5/22/01 City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ONO City, County Health Department ®Yes ONO Article 6 - Water Supply Unknown Other Local Agencies ❑Yes (ENO and sewage disposal Other Regional Agencies Oyes ®No State Agencies ❑Yes (ENO Federal Agencies ❑Yes ONO C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Eyes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment Ozoning variance ❑special use permit Usubdivision Osite plan ❑newirevision of master plan ❑resource management plan Oother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? A - C (Agricultural-Conservation) 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Seventeen one-family dwellings 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? X)Yes ONO 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/ mile radius of proposed action? Residential S Agricultural; A - C and R-40 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? UYes ONO 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land; how many lots are proposed? 17 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 38,006 sq. ft. 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes E)No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? 13Yes ONO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? K)Yes ONO 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ®No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Oyes ONO N/A D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any advers: impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate o avoid them. E. Verification 1 certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/SMo_rN me Forestbrook Builders Inc. Date 5/22/01 Signature Title Secretary By: nt u a If the action is in41he Coastal Area, and you are a state agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceedin with this assessment. 6 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman, Planning Board Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski, December 12, 2001 1 recently found out from a neighbor that vacant land adjoining my property is being considered for development. I believe an environmental impact study is being prepared at this time. I wanted to let you know that I am adamantly opposed to this area being developed into a subdivision. When I bought an existing home in Southold 3 years ago, one of the reasons I decided on Southold was because there were still pockets of undeveloped land. I also believed the town wanted to maintain areas like this in an effort to not become another overbuilt south fork. The area near my house has always had poor water testings in the past. I know there is a moratorium on additional lines for town water. Since we don't have town water on N. Bayview, I wonder how the developer will be able to bring it into this area. If they are able to find a loophole, I feel strongly that the impact of a large number of houses will be devastating to the existing wells belonging to myself and my neighbors. I would also like to find out how I can be notified of upcoming hearings or other actions concerning this development. It was very disconcerting to find orange stakes on my property one day (including one on my marker next to an existing neighbor!)without having been notified that surveyors were going to be on my property. If this area is approved for development, I want to be apprised because it require me to reassess whether I want to stay in Southold or not. Thank you, V �I ManKith � Property address: �1 DEC 18 20014 4950 N. Bayview Mailing address: Southold Town 60 W. Broad St. Planning Board Apt. 4F Mt. Vernon, NY 10052 0 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �OgUFFO(/(c 0 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 �� (/ Chairman yJ2 P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDS 15i Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. .f. `� Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 11, 2001 Richard Lark, Esq. P. O. Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Forestbrook at Bayview North side of North Bayview Rd., approx. 227.76' west of Jacob's Lane, Southold SCTM# 1000-79-2-7 Zone: Agricultural Conservation Dear Mr. Lark: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 10, 2001: WHEREAS, the Planning Board has before it a proposal for a major subdivision for 17 proposed lots on 37.77 acres; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has reviewed the yield map, last dated September 27, 2001, but will be conducting a review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) prior to making a determination on the yield; BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PPS is 5 Ms. Valerie Scopaz, AJCP Lawrence and Diane Walser Town Planner 4760 North Bayview Road Town of Southold Southold, N.Y. 11971 P.O. Box 1179 December 10. 2001 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Ms. Scopaz: In regard to the proposed subdivision in the Town of Southold in the vicinity of North Bayview Road and North Bayview Extension, Suffolk Co. Tax Map # 1000-79-2-7, we would like it be known that according to our property deed for SCTM # 1000-79-24.2, we have right-of-way to the adjacent roadway so noted on the tax map. We therefore request that any plans for improvement that involve this right-of-way be forwarded to us for review. Please see the enclosed copy of our deed. Thank you, l 0 E C 10 2001 Southold Town Planning Board , vt"Jua M1VAMU"V V&V&VAkVAvAUA'1'I TITLE INSURANCE POLICY First American Title Insurance Company of New York Policy No. ? 276024 'Fide NO. 605-5-2893 —7n eon6icleration of the payment of its charges for the examination of title and its premium for insurance, insures the within named insured against all loss or damage not exceeding the amount of insurance stated herein and in addition the costs and ex- penses of defending the title,estate or interest insured, which the insured shall sustain by reason of any defeet or defects of title affecting the premises described in Schedule A or affecting the interest of the insured therein as herein set forth, or by reason of unmarketability of the title of the insured to or in the premises, or by reason of liens or encumbrances affecting title at the date hereof, or by reason of any statutory lien for labor or material furnished prior to the date hereof which has now gained or which may hereafter gain priority over the interest insured hereby, or by reason of a lack of access to and from the premises,excepting all loss and damage by reason of the estates, interests,defects,objections, liens,encumbrances and other matters set forth in Sched- ule B, or by the conditions of this policy hereby incorporated into this contract, the loss and the amount to be ascertained in the manner provided in said conditions and to be payable upon compliance by the insured with the stipulations of said conditions, and not otherwise. ,7n gOitne66 'Wkereol, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COM1-ANY OF NEW YORK has caused this policy to be signed and sealed on its date of issue set forth herein, the policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized signature Cou NTERSICNRn pa �, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Peconic Abstract Inc 4. 369-0222 of NEW YORK �a �s lZFD5HetG �C yy Rv UT /eanre UTHI RAnstettTURF t OI`vaWO� t� i Office Manager s('1�f(� (ifi 'fif��ir � n l�ti ( n iiVn n I'N Vi�ttt �i6[IT(irmiri1Pn�f(S1Vi�tAfit)i�tPfsantVi�i6iitii�in�lc�3�i17rit7fi3iYYri7ii (See Over) recording officer has refused to accept from if" sated a satisfaction of the such actions and proceedings, and U1 r tie unuree rs n mor F Fee•p:0'tu' insured mortgage and there has been a final minalion sustaining the made to satisfy or giMclinate prior liens or encumbrances not set fort refusal because of a defect in the title to t]w sa] gage. Schedule It, le) Where me insured shall have negotiate a loan to be made on the (e) Whws In1W has been dclinitch filed in acoutdamr wtth security of a mortgage on the insured's estate or interest in the premises and conditions of this policy, the loss ur damage shall be puy:dde within 11 the title shall have beenrejected by the proposed lender and it shall have been days thereafter. finally determined that the rejection of the title was justified because of a defect or encumbrance not excepted in]his policy. CONDITIONS(Continued on Back of Schedule B) Policy No. Z 276024 Amount of Insurance$ 125 ,000 .00 Date of Issue 11/24/86 Title No. 605—S-2893 Name of Insured: LAWRENCE WALSER AND DIANE WALSER , HIS WIFE The estate or interest insured by this policy is FEE SIMPLE vested in (lie insured by means of DEED from Cheryl Ann Hellman , f/k/a Cheryl Ann McCabe and Cathleen P. McCabe , dated 11/24/86 and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk . SCHEDULE A The premises in which the insured has the estate or interest covered by this policy is described on the description sheet annexed. SCHEDULE B The following estates, interests, defects, objections to title, liens and Lions, liens or encumbrances created, suffered, assumed or agreed to encumbrances and ether matters are excepted from the coverage of out by or with the privity of the insured. standard form of policy: 5.Title to any property beyond the lines of the premises, or title to 1.Defects and encumbrances arising or becoming a lien after the date areas within or rights or easements in any abutting streets. mads. of this policy. avenues, lanes, ways or waterways, or the richt to maintain therein 2.Consequences of the exercise and enforcement or attempted enforce- vaults, tunnels, ramps is any Provides structure such improvement,antes ment of any governmental war or police powers over the premises. this certificate insuspecred. Notwithstandingeasements any provisions in this 3.Any laws, regulations or ordinances (including, but not limited to Paragraph to the contrary,this certificate,unless otherwise excepted. zoning, building, and environmental protection) as to the use, insures the ordinary rights of access and egress beknging h,abutting occupancy, subdivision or improvement of the premises, adopted or owners. unposed by any governmental body, or the effect of any non- 6.Title to any personal property, whether tine saint, IM attached to or compliance with,or any violation thereof. used in connection with said premises or otherwise. 4. Judgments against the insured or estates, interests, defects, objec- 7. Mortgage held of record by Cheryl Ann Hellman , f/k/a Cheryl. Ann McCabe, dated 11/24/86 and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk in the amount of $125 , 000.00 . 8 . Survey made by Peconic Surveyors Engineers dated 10/10/86 shows vacant land. - .--�pvr,..o. -em;u Miran cel• -omy;. .171:.,na,._.. - .....� .••••' •,, ^.uunn m�cc,, c,tept rt estate taxes, assrssments water charges and sewer rents. AMENDED SCHEDULE q Title No. 11/21/86 ALL that certain and being on the w plot ' Piece or parcel 'I the Town westerly side of North Ba land , situate, lying known °f Southold, C Lott °f Suffolky iew hoad y and designated at Southold Subdivision for as No, 2 on and State of New premises bein Joseph Shi a sketch York, g more Pule, dated November Ilan of Minor particularly bounded and described 1979 BEGINNING at a , said point as follows; marked by a monument ou the westerly formerly of Ga at the northeasterly of North Bayview herein Gagen and the southeasterly Y corner of la iew Road 1177, described; said point ad now or 45 feet or place Y corner of the premises Of the southerly from of the corner formed by being distant side of North Bay of North Ba v by the intersection Y view Road ; Y iew Road with the w THENCEesterly along said land 200 feet ; of Gagen, North 68 degrees 50 minutes West THENCE still minutesalong said land of West 120 feet to a point marked along South 21 degrees 10 THENCE North 68 degreesby a monument ; by a monument and land 50 minutes West 25 feet to now or formerly of Dougherty a point marked THENCE North 21 degrees 10 Y and others ; or formerly of Jose minutes ph A. East 350,60 feet to land now THENCE South _ Shipule; South 68 degrees S side of North Bayview.. Road ; minutes 225 feet to E THENCE the westerly degrees along said westerly side BEGINNING10 . minutes West 230,60 °f North feet to the Point Road South 21 point or place of TOGETHER with the right to the right of way extendin southeasterlyuse in common with others to .North BayviewhRoadatherly line of said premises The policy to be Issued under this report will Insure the premises which by law constitute real Property.the title to such buildings and FOR Improvements erected on CONVEYANCING TOGETHER with all the right, title and Interest of the ONLY in the street in front of and adjoining said Premises party of the first party,of, in and to the land lying Page 2 Albert J. Krupski, President • S�ff�(� • Town Hall James King,Vice-President 53095 CQ 53095 Route 25 J= Henry Smith hGym P.O.Box 1179 Artie Foster y = Southold, New York 11971-0959 Ken Poliwoda • �� Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Trustees DATE: November 26, 2001 ri u G 7 200 RE: Forestbrook at Bayview Southold Town SCTM#1000-79-2-7 Planning Board The Southold Town Board of Trustees will inspect the Forestbrook at Bayview Subdivision on its field inspection on Wednesday, December 12, 2001. We will be in contact with you about our determination. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman = y.2 P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS N Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDS Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE JR •ji _ Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGG O PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Albert J. Krupski, Chairman, and the Southold Town Trustees From: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Date: November 14, 2001 Subject: Forestbrook at Bayview SCTM#1000-79-2-7 The Planning Board requests that the Trustees review the wetlands line on the enclosed yield and cluster map and let the Planning Board know if you agree with the line as delineated. VS:ck Att. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS O$UffU��C B ��j Town Hall,P.O. Bo State Route 25 ENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ti� y O. Box 1179 Chairman C � Southold, New York 11971-0959 WILLIAM J. CREMERS wTelephone (631) 765-1938 o KENNETH L.EDWARDS Fax(631) 765-3136 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,RICHARD CAGGIAN0 JR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Via Facsimilie & U.S. Mail November 14, 2001 Mr. Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision Forestbrook at Bayview SCTM#1000-79-2-7 Dear Mr. Voorhis: The Planning Board would like you to review the enclosed material for conformance to additional information that you requested in your environmental review. Prior to starting the review, the Board would like to receive from you an estimate of what this will cost as the developer has agreed to cover same. The applicant is desirous of obtaining sketch approval at the Planning Board's December 10th public meeting. The Planning Board, at that time, would need to have an idea of what the acceptable lot yield would be. If you could respond at your earliest convenience, it would be appreciated. Vtruly yours, 4 � G�z� Valerie Scopaz, AICP Town Planner VS:ck Encl. 0 LARK& FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD-P.O.BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935-0973 (631)734-6807 RICHARD F. LARK MARY LOU FOLTS October 30, 2001 Ms . Valerie Scopaz Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25u � P. O. Box 1179 + g. Southold, New York 11971-0959 ` RE : Applicant - Forestbrook Builders Inc . OCT 2001Agent - Lark & Folts, Esqs . 3 Q Major Subdivision for Forestbrook at Bayview (SCTM #1000-79-2-7) avuthotdTown Dear Ms . Scopaz : Planning Board In connection with the above-captioned subdivision, I am enclosing Check No. 1025 of Forestbrook Builders Inc . to the Town of Southold Planning Board for $500 . 00 to cover the environmental review cost . It is my understanding the wetlands have been flagged and are shown on the revised yield map . Concerning the right-of-way that Paul and Adelaide Hale have access to their property from North Bayview Road over the property subject to the subdivision, one of three scenarios will happen: (1) An access parcel will be offered to the Hales ' so they can use Road "A" as shown on the September 27, 2001 Cluster Sketch Plan where the existing 15 ' right-of-way will be eliminated; (2) The Hales will refuse the offer of the access strip to Road "A" and the existing 15 ' right-of-way will remain "as is" ; or (3) The Hales will accept the access strip offer to Road "A" and will refuse to relinquish the 15 ' right-of-way. Once the sketch plan approval is obtained, the negotiations will begin to finalize the right-of-way options . The Yield Map and the Cluster Sketch Plan have been revised in accordance with the August 6 , 2001 Draft Staff Report of Nelson, Pope & Voorhis . These maps were forwarded to the Planning Board on October 9, 2001 . Please review the maps to see they conform to your requests . The original subdivision application was forwarded to your office on May 22 , 2001 . It is now five months later and the applicant believes nothing has been accomplished. As you know 0 Southold Town Planning Board -2- October 30 , 2001 from reading the application, the applicant is a contract vendee and his time is about to run out on the contract . This is further complicated because the Sellers are quite elderly and live out of state . The applicant needs to get to the stage of at least sketch plan approval, so as to make a decision on whether to consummate the sale . He has only until December to make that decision. It would be greatly appreciated if you would place this matter on the Planning Board' s next meeting. Very truly yours, �✓/ ,fit L,.f/� � i � Richard F. Lark RFL/bd Enclosure LARK & FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD-P.O.BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935-0973 (631)734-6807 ' RICHARD F. LARK MARY LOU FOLTS October 30 , 2001 Ms . Valerie Scopaz Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 .. �+c P. O. Box 1179 ,. , Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: Applicant - Forestbrook Builders Inc . OCT Agent - Lark & Folts, Esqs . 3 O Major Subdivision for Forestbrook at Bayview (SCTM #1000-79-2-7) 3outholdTown Dear Ms . Scopaz : Planning Board In connection with the above-captioned subdivision, I am enclosing Check No. 1025 of Forestbrook Builders Inc . to the Town of Southold Planning Board for $500 . 00 to cover the environmental review cost . It is my understanding the wetlands have been flagged and are shown on the revised yield map . Concerning the right-of-way that Paul and Adelaide Hale have access to their property from North Bayview Road over the property subject to the subdivision, one of three scenarios will happen: (1) An access parcel will be offered to the Hales ' so they can use Road "A" as shown on the September 27, 2001 Cluster Sketch Plan where the existing 15 ' right-of-way will be eliminated; (2) The Hales will refuse the offer of the access strip to Road "A" and the existing 15 ' right-of-way will remain "as is" ; or (3) The Hales will accept the access strip offer to Road "A" and will refuse to relinquish the 15 ' right-of-way. Once the sketch plan approval is obtained, the negotiations will begin to finalize the right-of-way options . The Yield Map and the Cluster Sketch Plan have been revised in accordance with the August 6 , 2001 Draft Staff Report of Nelson, Pope & Voorhis . These maps were forwarded to the Planning Board on October 9 , 2001 . Please review the maps to see they conform to your requests . The original subdivision application was forwarded to your office on May 22 , 2001 . It is now five months later and the applicant believes nothing has been accomplished. As you know a • 0 Southold Town Planning Board -2- October 30 , 2001 from reading the application, the applicant is a contract vendee and his time is about to run out on the contract . This is further complicated because the Sellers are quite elderly and live out of state . The applicant needs to get to the stage of at least sketch plan approval, so as to make a decision on whether to consummate the sale . He has only until December to make that decision. It would be greatly appreciated if you would place this matter on the Planning Board' s next meeting. Very truly yours, Richard F. Lark RFL/bd Enclosure LARK & FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD-P.O.BOX 973 'P CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935-0973 (631)734-6807 RICHARD F. LARK MARY LOU FOLTS October 9 , 2001 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P . O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE : Applicant - Forestbrook Builders Inc . Agent - Lark & Folts, Esqs . Major Subdivision for Forestbrook at Bayview (SCTM #1000 79-2-7) Dear Mr. Orlowski : Pursuant to the Draft Staff Report of Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC, I am enclosing three prints of the revised Yield Map and Cluster Sketch Plan both dated September 27, 2001 . After you have reviewed same with the Board, kindly let me know if this matter can now be set for a hearing date. Very truly ryours, Kichard F . LaYK RFL/bd Enclosures OCT 10 2DW1 Southold Town Planning Board VALERIE SCOPAZ = OG'y� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN PLANNER C* Z P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 O Fax(516) 765-3136 Telephone(516) 765-1938 OFFICE OF THE TOWN PLANNER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 11, 2001 Richard Lark, Esq. P. O. Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision of Forestbrook At Bayview SCTM # 1000-79-2-7 Dear Mr. Lark: The Planning Board reviewed the above-noted subdivision application at its August 201h Work Session. As noted in the enclosed draft Staff Report, there are several issues that require resolution. First, the proposed 17-lot yield plan does not conform to some of the minimum standards set forth in the Subdivision Regulations. These issues are identified in the attached Staff Report. Second, the application does not contain supporting documentation as to the status of the right- of-way to the Hale Property (SCTM#1000-79-2-6), particularly given the proposed access to Lot #9 on the yield map and Lot#7 on the cluster map. The Planning Board would like the yield map to be revised in accordance with the observations noted in the Staff Report. In addition, the boundaries of all wetlands on the site, and adjacent, shall be flagged in the field and shown on the revised preliminary yield map in order to facilitate their verification by the Town Trustees and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Along with the yield map, the EAF Part I should be corrected and resubmitted along with a check for$500.00 to cover the environmental review cost. Upon receipt of the fee, revised EAF and yield map, the Planning Board will begin a coordinated environmental review. If you have any questions, please contact me. Your patience during this period while we search for replacement staff has been appreciated. Very truly yours, UG�.PI�t-tom ��G� Valerie Scopaz, AICP Town Planner �'�. . NELSON, POPE i "ORRIS LLC ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD,MELVruz,N 11747-91M (851) 497-5885 PAX (WI) 497-5898 NPV®NTi LSONPOPE,COM DRAFT STAFF REPORT PROJECT NAME: ForestBrook At Bayview(NP&V No. 01218) PROJECT TYPE: 17 Lot Subdivision PREPARED BY: Laura Jennings/Charles Voorhis DATE: August 6, 2001 LOCATION: North side of North Bayview Road, approximately 250 feet west of North Road to Bayview Road, Bayview 5250 North Bayview Road SCTM: 1000-079-2-7 ZONING DISTRICT: Agricultural Conservation District (AC)-80,000 sq. ft. lots TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 37.771 acres SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property is located on the north side of North Bayview Road, approximately 250 feet west of North Road to Bayview Road, Bayview. The subject property is located at 5250 North Bayview Road. The property is 37.771 acres in area and is situated within the Agricultural Conservation Zoning District. The property is identified as Suffolk County Tax Map parcel 1000-079-2-7. The majority of the subject property is vacant undeveloped woodland. There are a series of dirt paths/trails which are located on the southeastern portion of the property. The subject property contains steep slopes. The subject property is located adjacent to the east of wetlands and is located east of Goose Creek. The wetlands are identified on the NYSDEC regulatory maps as system SO-38. There is a proposed recharge basin located on the project site. A right-of-way transects the property from North Road to an out parcel which provides access for tax lot number 1000-079-2-6 located in the middle of the subject property. CAwindows\TEMP\FORRPT.DOC Page 1 REQUESTED ACTION Applicants are requesting approval of an application to subdivide the 37.771 acre parcel into (17) seventeen lots. The applicants have submitted a seventeen (17) lot Yield Plan and a seventeen (17) lot Cluster Sketch Plan. YIELD MAP VS CLUSTER MAP YIELD MAP The yield map consists of seventeen (17) lots ranging in size from 80,094 sq. ft. to 117,870 sq. ft. An approximately 1,300 feet road ending in a cul de sac is proposed to allow access from the lots to North Bayview Road. According to A106-33(G) where dead end streets are designed to be so ermanentl the shouldin general not exceed 800 feet in length. The Planning Board ma wish to permit an exception or to have the applicant provide an alternate arrangement. The plan shows the building envelopes on the plan. The plan depicts a recharge basin which is not expected to have sufficient size to provide feasible drainage capacity. The Planning Board should determine if the yield map is feasible. The Plan should identify town/state designated wetlands. The irrigation pond provides a 100 foot setback; however, no setback is provided from the larger wetlands system. CLUSTER MAP The cluster map proposes seventeen (17) lots ranging in size from 38,006 sq. ft. to 64,389 sq. ft. Lot 5 and 6 are 7.2691 acres and 8.1979 acres, respectively. The lots do not meet zoning requirements since the lots are not 80,000 sq. ft. However, through the Cluster Development process, such lots would be permitted according to 100-181(A)(3) provided the minimum lot size shall be: Without public water and sewer: 30,000 sq. ft.; with public water: 20,000 sq. ft.; and with public water and sewer: 10,000 sq. ft. The proposed project involves well water. One road which splits into two cul de sacs is proposed to allow access from the lots to North Bayview Road. A 50 foot vegetative buffer is proposed along the southern property boundary and North Bayview Road. However, the vegetative buffer is part of the proposed lots and may be difficult to maintain. The Planning Board may want to consider the proposed vegetative buffer area as open space All lots are greater than 30,00 sq. ft. in size. Areas in excess of 15% slope should be depicted on the plan. Town and state wetlands area should be designated and non- jurisdiction letters obtained. MINOR REVIEW VS. MAJOR REVIEW The proposed yield map and cluster map meets the criteria for major subdivision review pursuant to the definition of a major subdivision outlined in A106-13 of the Southold Town Code as outlined below: C:\windows\TEMP\FORRPT.DOC Page Subdivision of five (S) more lots (seventeen (17) lots are �osed) or any subdivision requiring t onstruction of a new street. SEQRA CLASSIFICATION The project would be classified as an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA 6 NYCRR Part 617.4(6) and 617.2(ak). ARCHAEOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY The project site is located within or in close proximity to an area of archaeological sensitivity as shown on the NYS Archaeological Sensitivity Map (1990). A cultural resources assessment should be performed. The NYS Office of Parks, recreation, and Historical Preservation should be contacted. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES OR CONSTRAINTS According to the NYSDEC Wetland Map, wetlands are shown west of the property and are identified as SO-38. The location of and distance to the wetlands should be shown on the plan. The water table elevations ranges from 0 to 3 feet according to the Suffolk County Health Department, 1999. The topography of the site ranges from 10 feet to 30 feet, therefore the depth to groundwater ranges from 0 to 27. Development is proposed in areas of higher elevations. According to the Suffolk County Soil Survey, 1979, The subject property is located in an area of the following soils: Plymouth loamy sand, PIC- 8 to 15 percent slopes,excessively drained Plymouth loamy sand, PIA-0 to 3 percent slopes, excessively drained Riverhead sandy loam, RdB-3 to 8 percent slopes,well drained Carver and Plymouth sands, CpE- 15 to 35 percent slopes, excessively drained Riverhead sandy loam, RdC- 8 to 15 percent slopes, well drained . Riverhead sandy loam, RdA-0-3 percent slopes, well drained Haven Loam, He-thick surface layer The site is partially wooded with mixed oak-pine forest and abandoned filed with pioneer vegetation. The site contains wetlands and diverse habitat communities. The natural heritage program should be contacted. Additional environmental review may be appropriate. Private water supply wells and on-site sanitary systems are proposed. Suffolk county department of Health Services (SCDHS) Realty subdivision (Article 6) and water supply (Article 4) approval is required. C:\windows\TEMP\FORRPT.DOC Page3 ZONING REQUIREMENTS* • The dimensional requirements for Agricultural-Conservation Zoning is outlined below: DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS A-C ZONING; BULK SCHEDULE FOR RESIDENTAIL DISTRICTS T77 ea, minimum 80,000 SF ver e 20% dth 175 feet th 250 feet minimum* 60 feet minimum for 1 20 feet Yard for both 45 feet Yard 75 feet Floor Area 850 feet Hei t 35 feet YIELD MAP The building envelopes on lot 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 do not conform to the minimum side yard requirement of 45 as they are all 40 feet. CLUSTER MAp The lots do not meet zoning requirements since the lots are not 80,000 sq. ft. However, through the Cluster Development process, such lots would be permitted according to 100-181(A)(3) public water: 20,000 sq. ft.; and with public water and sewer: 10,000 sq. ft.provided the minimum lot size shall be: Without public water and sewer: 30,000 sq. ft.; with Building envelopes for the lots on the cluster map do not meet the required minimum dimensional requirements. However, according to §100-181(C)(3), in a cluster development, lot area, width, depth, front yard, rear yard, and side yards may be reduced to less than the minimum requirements set forth in the bulk schedule, provided that such modification or changes shall not result in a greater average density or coverage of dwelling units than is permitted in the zoning district wherein the land lies. REFERRALS No referrals were received/reviewed in connection with this staff report. C:\windows\TENTTORRPT.DOC page f 1' 1 COMMENDATIONS/PROPEDURE • I. The distance to the wetlands should be shown on the preliminary subdivision map. In addition, the DEC and the Town Trustees should be contacted to verify wetlands on the property and west of the property and applications should be submitted. 2. The recharge basin on the yield map does not appear to be feasible given wetland setbacks and required capacity. The yield map shows the proposed road as approximately 1,300 feet, according to A106-33(G), where dead end streets are designed to be so permanently, they should in general, not exceed (800) feet in length. The Planning Board should determine if the yield is feasible based on these issues, or if a revised yield map should required. 3. The side yard dimensional requirements are not on the yield plan for the building envelopes on lot 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17. They do not conform to the minimum side yard requirement of 45 as they are all 40 feet. 4. The applicant should discuss whether lot 7 on the cluster map and lot 9 on the yield map will have permitted access to the right of way which provides access for tax lot number 1000-79-2-6 (Hale property). In addition, whether the Hale property will have permitted access to the proposed road. 5. Subdivision will require Suffolk County Department of Health Services Realty subdivision (Article 6) approval. Also, Water Supply(Article 4) approval is required. 6. The project is an unlisted action with a number of agencies involved and potential for adverse environmental impacts. It is recommended that a coordinated review with involved agencies be conducted in accordance with SEQRA Part 617.6(b) (2) and (3) by circulating the EAF for a 30 day period to establish the Planning Board as Lead Agency. Involved agencies include SCDHS, NYSDEC and the Town Trustees. 7. It is recommended that a more in depth environmental review be conducted. The EAF Part 1 should be corrected, a Part 11 EAF prepared, and the site should be inspected. This and referrals should be considered in order to formulate a determination of significance. The potential cumulative impacts of this project combined with the Zoumas at Bayview application should be considered. C:\windows\TEMP\FORRPT.DOC Pages • a LARK & FOLTS Attorneys at Law V/ 28785 MAIN ROAD-P.O.BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935-0973 -------------------- (631)734-6807 RICHARD F. LARK MARY LOU FOLTS July 6, 2001 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE : Applicant - Forestbrook Builders Inc. Agent - Lark & Folts, Esqs . Major Subdivision for Forestbrook at Bayview SCTM #1000-79-2-7) Dear Mr. Orlowski : In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing three prints of the revised Yield Map dated June 26, 2001 . After you have reviewed same with the Board, kindly let me know if this matter can be set for a hearing date . Very t my yours, RFL/bd Richard F. Lark Enclosures n2w eo�' LARK& FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD-P.O.BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935A973 -- (631)734-6807 RICHARD F. LARK !!! JUN 2 8 20o MARY LOU FOLTS S0Uth'0!d Tmin Planning Board June 25, 2001 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold Town Planning Board Town I-all, 53095 State Route 25 P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: Applicant - Forestbrook Builders Inc . Agent - Lark & Folts, Esqs . Major Subdivision for Forestbrook at Bayview (SCTM #1000-79-2-7) Dear Mr. Orlowski : In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing the following: 1 . Authorization Letter of Anthony M. Hurtado, Secretary of Forestbrook Builders Inc . 2 . Check No. 1012 of Forestbrook Builders Inc . payable to Town of Southold in the amount of $22 . 00 which Craig Turner said was the deficit for the application fee . Per your suggestion I spoke to the town attorney, Gregory Yakaboski, Esq. , about the computation of the lots for the yield map. Mr. Yakaboski indicated he would speak to you about it . Please schedule this matter for the next available work session. Very t T-Iqy yours, RFL/bd ichard F. LaLZ rk Enclosures I, Anthony M. Hurtado, Secretary of Forestbrook Builders Inc . , having its principal place of business at 3 Penny Lane, St . James, New York 11780 , hereby certify that Forestbrook Builders Inc . is a contract vendee in a certain contract of sale dated May 17, 2001 between Mary Grace Dougherty et al . , Sellers and Forestbrook Builders Inc . , Purchaser, for property located at 5250 North Bayview Road, Southold, New York (SCTM #1000-79-2-7) . Forestbrook the terms of the contract ofcsale stoefile en uanoapplicationaforrized pursuntta major subdivision and any other forms required by the Town of Southold or the County of Suffolk for processing a subdivision application for this property. I, Anthony M. Hurtado, Secretary of Forestbrook Builders Inc . , also authorize Lark & Folts, Esqs . to act as my agents and handle all necessary work involved in the subdivision process with the Southold Town Planning Board and the County of Suffolk. FORESTBROOK BUILDS S INC. By r Anthony H rtado, Secretary Sworn to before me this 24th day of May, 2001 c% Notary Public MMMTHOMM 6b 011ftk ebb of Wm6woNYak n�irssAug.13, a LARK & FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD-P.O.BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935-0973 7ft� --- (631)734-6807 RICHARD F. LARK May 22 , 2001 MARY LOU FOLTS Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 / 'J i�)Icgbo6/?_ P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE : Applicant - Forestbrook Builders Inc . Agent - Lark & Folts, Esqs . Major Subdivision for Forestbrook at Bayview (SCTM 41000-79-2-7) Gentlemen: In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing the following: 1 . Subdivision Application Form. 2 . Copies of property Deeds recorded in Liber 11003 Page 280 and Liber 11329 Page 525 . 3 . Part 1 of Full Environmental Assessment Form. 4 . Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form. 5 . Check No. 1007 of Forestbrook Builders Inc . payable to Town of Southold in the amount of . $4 , 778 . 00 for the application fee . 6 . Eight prints of the Cluster Sketch Plan, Subdivision Map of Forestbrook at Bayview, dated May 3 , 2001 . 7 . Six prints of the Yield Map, Subdivision Map of Forestbrook at Bayview, dated May 3 , 2001 . If all is in order, would you kindly place this matter on the next available Planning Board agenda for their consideration and notify me of the date and time . If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call . ® Very truly yours, Vk RFL/bd MAY 2 3 2001 Rhard F . L Enclosures Southold Town PMMft BWd LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans t Print Date: 2/6/04 Site Plan File Type: 0 SCAN Date: JUN 2 6 2006 Project Type: Maior Records Management Status: Conditional Sketch Approval _ SCTM # : 1000 : 79.-2-7 Project Name: Forestbrook at Bawiew Conservation Address: Location: Located No North Bawiew Road 180 feet w/o Jacobs Lane, in Southold Hamlet: Southold Applicant Name: J & C Holding, LP Owner Name: John Hurtado Jr. Zone 1 : A-C File Date: - --- -- - — - - OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information Endorse Site Plan Date: Zone 2: Zone 3: County Filing Date: C and R's : Homeowners Association R and M Agreement: LOCATION MAP: SCALE 1"=600' i SOUTHOLD BAY SOUTHOLD BAY 575'42'20°E ' 157.48' IIS,„, s- - _ - 10 O R-}O V ZONING USE OISERIGT LINE EP - EE i O A_G ._ 4 n O O O V GWELUNG AA ` U U N EF, o'O O To w z P /CP- 0 �P C = � U NORTH BAYVIEW ROAD ;j O _ I � 7 o P N ° t 1n U) O C O N o �„ O I E O E N � O y0UU 1 . 10 ' ,UC) I .. GO 0 O vS 0 .c 0 0 � I ° m O c 0 0 m O _ & O N -I U I C y 0 3 C I �1 1} ° R ° of 8 W I FI R Do ACRES) US 0 ' n Un / \ oN I 3 -0 ^ I czw � I N ni.� I now or formerly v rn O I Peaanla Land LANDWARD OF O O Trust JMIT N LANDTWARC uWT DR U I FRESHWq PEIA E A6 Z / °ESHWgrER yLIALNpS FS Q= \\ CD, N SEPT I999u5E / '^ I OILICOq'EO BY Lq NO u5E SEPT T999 zD in LED S70'48'10"E I\ / 1 '- - - - 740.30' 800.30' , \ a I I/ °No F RP c -- - �- -�- - � I REBASINGe - -- — s — — 15 'r I II `r I 'L - - - 750.06' I v I 60.119 BE I \\ rn m 71 10I I I I wl 1 I 20.55'- - � - - - I B1,777 E.F I I 1 / 1 \� N70'20100"W h I ro o L - - - - - _ - - _ � E°tom ° ° VN °L 0 C) C, 0 336 52' M4 �CJ 260•poe f- - - - - - - - - O oc 85 O -oz formerly o0 1 �o p 7 } George or uerry, Jr. Q o 1 nx.61x SIF, 1 o l a b Ceor9 0 / 3 0 DO i'0° / � I 81,653 0 SF I O I E C> \ W I w 0 DO 1 � oro I p ' ° K z 1 3 E r C\.y6 D' Nu 0 0 0 r o - - -)3659- - - - � 1 " o [if of c U 3 J vo 0 -0 a5� PA v' Q I d TJ I HL6� V) / 2 L�'LP L - - - - - - - -I 337.38' O © p Oj B1.66fi F. I E ODo ED s l I Om n� o` CJ Z I I o ° Ea° 0 c -� / / P O RECHARGE o / BASIN W m / 598.12' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ N74'42' — _ _ _ 387.78' L / WATER LAIN SITE DATA NORTH TOTAL AREA 24.043 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS 8 ZONING USE DISTRICT "R-40 & A—C" SCHOOL DISTRICT SOUTHOLD FIRE DISTRICT SOUTHOLD UTILITIES NYNEX. LIPA G.W.M.Z. IV NOTE 1. WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM SURVEY BY ANTHONY W. LEWANDOWSKI, L.S. LAST DATED NOV. 09, 2000. 2. TOPOGRAPHICAL DATA SHOWN HEREON IS FROM SURVEY PREPARED BY ANTHONY LEWANDOWSKI, L.S. LAST DATED NOV, 09, 2000, AND IS REFERENCED TO TOPOGRAPHICAL MAPS "5 EASTERN TOWNS". 3. THIS SKETCH WAS PREPARED FROM SURVEY PREPARED BY ANTHONY W. LEWANDOWSKI. L.S. LAST DATED NOV. 09, 2000. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT INTENDED FOR TITLE PURPOSES. 4. WETLANDS LINE SHOWN HEREON IS FROM SURVEY PREPARED BY ANTHONY W. LEWANDOWSKI, L.S. LAST DATED NOV. 09, 2000. 5. LOT 8 NOT TO BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED. OWNER CHRISTINE C. HURTADO, JOHN L. HURTADO, SR., DEBRA J. HURTADO & JOHN L. HURTADO, JR. 1 " P.O. BOX 1925 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11977 TEST HOLE #1 TEST HOLE #2 JOB NO:2002-051 YIELD Yield Sketch Plan DATE: REVISION: MAR. 05, 2002 P,��I PREPARED Prepared For:"CHRISTINE C. HURTADO, LOAMY SAND 00 BROWN 0.5 JOHN L. HURTADO, SR., GAMY SAND DEBRA J. HURTADO & 2.0 — 2.5 PALE BROWN BROWN JOHN L. HURTADO, JR. " SILLY SAND SILTY SAND s.0 4D At PALE BROWN PALE BROWN Bayview FINE LO FINE TO MEDIUM SAND COARSE SAND I'-, J I ni Townof GI ------ 9.6 -- -- I H1 h � Southold PALE BROWN PALE BROWN SCALE:1"=1Do' FINE TO FINE TO Suffolk County, New York MEDIUM SAND COARSE SAND n.0 CCO � 17.0 FOX LAND SURVEYING Suffolk County Tax Mop: PO BOX 224 - 01st. Sect. Bleck Lot SPEONK, N.Y. 11972 1000 079.00 05.00 020.013 ' (531) 325-2902 E� I Young & Young, Land Surveyors LOCATION MAP \ 1 / 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 631-727-2303 \ / SCALE: 1'=600' ' \ Alden W. Young,Young, Surveyor Howard W. & L.S. 1894) ` w, N \ ` / \ N Thomas C. Wolyert Professional Engineer e tt Open Space Sub(yi Cot W E \ \` Subdivision Map — "James W. Dawson" \ ✓omG-3 on t og as owso h S / _s \ SIN E GDGSE LflEEN 7pt lO" C ' \ .L � l S \ G mn o ; 1?� 3 S@ �o bdl�iS 0 1 n 9 , .50 > >7j, ?70 . On S 2.q7. Ip„ e W D pop \ " \I+/ +0 1P (� g o5 SOn „ $ o h4 \ O 7 L 9 \ 7�Fo y1p ^° now \ S a - / Do or 1676 50 E '\ nF "" �.' & Jo la F f e mer/y 9ertran r A Nnow ,V on FORESTBROOK Jr �� ; 6'' Wy Steil er/y gas AT BAYVIEW r ya" ,l ;;'/ / -- moa � �/;; %; ;6 n Gr SITE DATA hp xe'��e' • TOTAL AREA 37.771 ACRES wERANaS AREA A 1,275 S.F. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 4 __-_____ E 369 L.F.O LENGTH OFROAD __n ---_, • WETLANDS AREA 0.115 ACRE e ----------- ----- • 15R & GREATER SLOPE AREA 1.24B ACRES @Po'=:< =AyR6A`�R t �sse3 8`?>SOn ---' ze -- `I '1 II Dow • NET AREA = 37.771 - 0.115 - 1.248 = 36.408 ACRES ,yo-'� 1 , , , Opr fo 257. OF NET AREA = 9.102 ACRES spa or • A`� n0 1 r , i en Ce rm er mg A W gpot'l Or for 3;1 ' i l __-' i D/Woo wolg ly • DEVELOPMENT AREA = 9.096 ACRES o'e/oH / F. o merly '00' I % 3 wo/see ae M /e &. 157. & GREATER SLOPE SLOPE ARE OrV H ' 0 41 or -K _ ms` s �/' Z tRclpl l>' NN ,�� W r� ' �OI'I' \ _r N 40 0p, R, 6 o y o to r _ @@3>• _-j 7QOO. `' ` l' Q/9h1 ' S eb Wr kr s Merl o 1 , --2B— S0+ 9, 1 of Sp., e C'obr& i S ,Rrp,J CIE lel • ZONING USE DISTRICT = AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION \\\ A2J 41s sa BEY'' • VERTICAL DATUM = N.G.V. DATUM (M.S.L. 1929) 21 I I L 1J II 11 'I I I , I I I I I I `'O__ � _ / I / / _— _�\♦ I O + ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION 28.675 Acres I I rrt.�'-,'�•',IC�os r e S� 11 3.136 F. , `� ' 1 , -___ , I `, '1 ', ,? ` , NE W d EI AN AF O I II I ¢g / I '—_` k I � 11 I � i,;, , , 1 r / \ \ , , / \ 1 ------ 0 , ` 1\ HOWARD W. YOUNG, NYS. L.S. NO. 4589 ,oma,@7483 ��rC 3 ' $ 011E A�EA c �`' i ' 1 1 \ i `\ \ i 1 ` ` "LA`E$SIONP C 11 1 I11 15.148 S,F. ,' / ' -------- ------------ ------------ -------- ___-- i 'i I \ THOMAS C WOLPERT, N.Y.S. P.E. N0. 6148 r __ , --___- - SLOPE AREA G - 3,507 S.F. '\A AREA SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION '—� ---- � __-- —7 Y'll NE W. LED1 , , -515,893 Scl,. Ft. %pNk Ph 8e,906 5cu., Ft. `\ \ % m5893 E S HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S.LS. NO. 45893 $VQ Oe6 \ 1 1 I 4aPE AREAE v1 352X` --------- - ---- I � vY DEVELOPER iso D FORESTBROOK BUILDERS INC. boy. 3 PENNY LANE SAINT JAMES, NEW YORK 11780 98,730 5d. Ft. ') `� ' - �, ' _'i' o Q- /" 0 o oo a� SLPP AREA H I, /' ry I I 2g O i t '1 e5, S.F, 11 L -i j3 �' `` /' I I % 4/ D SUBDIVISION MAP FOR I-ipil Ft < FORESTBROOK AT BAYVIEW ° Y - )"JON, , 4 i h ri , 1 , / 1 now or formerly (7) Robert M. McCarthy i �`8Hh` RETF i -_1 { j 'v / i- & Mona R. McCarthy C y1' c At Bayview, Town of Southold /VQ t / z�FERT/�N Suffolk County, New York 3 R4L "PON ` s a County Tax Map oso-ml 1000 sxmmc 79 R-k 02 X01 7 Dq DRNTloN 6 o o r SKETCH PLAN , c �aQ �eNG _ zdS JUNE 16, 2003 MAP PREPARED MAY 22, 2003 SCALE 1" = 100' SP p= uGxuNexr ser ■ = uorvuuaFOUNDE rrvG p = stnrcE scr ♦- srANE rouxG JOB N0. 2001-0145 DWG. 2001-0145-sketch-plan Young & Young, Land Surveyors 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 - 63f-727-2303 LOCATION MAP N ` AldanHoward W.gY ung, Land S 84) wroeyar SCALE; 1"=600' \ / / \�^ Thomas C. Folpert, Prof eanonaI Engineer Ell `q w E \ Open Space, l ' Sub,. 40t2 \ \ NOTES �a6 Subdivision Map — "James W. Dawson" JO�es s/0 40,0 ` / \S CPEEB • BUILDING ENVELOPES SHOWN HEREON DEPICT THE MINIMUM 33 GCUSE a, Fi l r O �\ DOk'S' h " SDEYARO SETBACK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CODE OF THE TOWN 3 OF SOUTHOLD, CERTAINLY ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE \\` X90744- \\\ / -" S 201'3 F r „S46 COt \` �\ BOTTHCODESS DEST BE ADHERED YARDS. THE % OFF SUCH AS THE TOTAL SETBACK FOR LOT COVERAGE, THE LIVABLE FLOOR " \ O O / 11 S ,/ did%g 1 AREA AND BUILDING HEIGHT, G no 0'1• 6�7 Orhe ioh $ 5 >24 >1p., s W Mo F D 'O • ALTHOUGH IT IS PROPOSED THAT THE OWNERS OF LOT 6. LOT y 0H'sOn 7 AND THE RECHARGE BASIN WILL BE SERVIENT OWNER OF THE / n RIGHTS OF WAY, A COVENANT MAY BE MADE 50 THAT THE YY OWNERS WILL NOT HAVE A RIGHT OF WAY TO THE 'NORTH ROAD o TO BAYVIEW". aha/a'Fr far • TSY = TOTAL SIDE YARD 761650r'� ^' JFan F ee trly On nc ar Y Ste h7 er/y - E.gs rya � ' 1 boil '•ti' S _. ___ __-_------za O 3jSON F ze _-A `•ro �,� CooW �s 6 5 Wr fo �a /?OW ,' �, 6.79/x. ' r; & Q ehCe r, SITE DATA 8 or fo .37 A % fano a/Ser TOTAL AREA = 37.771 ACRES " - i1 o �de/ E Nr�erl J'00S0�1 i ,�� ; 3 Olger O%de a/e &Y til / _ , / O • TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS = 17 o a M. Hale 3 -�' `% ,- ' iV • PURSUANT TO SECTION 278 OF ,THE NEW YORK STATE LAW p oX To ° `��/ \ 4 / / v - AND SECTION 100-180 OF THE TOWN CODE, THIS CLUSTER sat.4o1 fEp,,. l Ri rry-- rr , 'V \ DEVELOPMENT PROPOSES THAT THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL r< `, Z Ra l01 G'eE M.H„tE En N 00 , W oe -' h nOW �^ REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL LOTS SHALL CONFORM To THE 'R40' Cao •1J• 'ate CV tO' , `l1 v°i i i 4 0 \' 0 , eM ry r far ZONING USE DISTRICT. - o ^N 663jS CR 9$0p, ^v i %C`J''o�/"�� Rig t O '' S 6B• C71-6 ,q 5'� er/.j, • ZONING USE DISTRICT = AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION 0 w 2J' N i�� `/ ^^woY .90P'SO. Ja Cah �" • VERTICAL DATUM = N.G.V. DATUM (M.S.L. 1929) '\ -� I r i 11 I ,\I\'zs^ zs• 23 i t r . F brj - _ i I i i I I I I i i i L ^_ .- J'00• �\ l i � P r I A D aF 1,02 u 0 V 9. °sc I aog, rN ;-el fir° 1 , r / , O r _rte 'I I � ,, � .�a' _ - / ENGINEERS CERTIFICATION e / r 1 �^ ``, , s til _ i `��` •s N Pip I ro i ' re i r P I \ � I I III I I / I I 1 � � � I I o• __ I I - �, 0 142, _ Q3 4p 20 9 e z ry II xa O HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. N0.,45893 61483 O \ ; / rg .� ",y i r THOMAS C. WOLPERT, N.Y.S, P.E. NO. 6148SS 4666`3 e / - SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION e I I , it 1 i 1 i 1 `� a� � ` • � / // /' ' o i , , 0 / 4' 1 C� NEw Q \\ �4 Y 6Q.ft. a.ft. * 7 � , r,_ o- 9 \ 1r1 ` l`?m. i N l 58 ''s ` 1`?; ,r x �` 487 lg' �> "1"O °s- `� _ _ _ _- ^/ , 4¢,696/5 ` °& y t p Oq- .9O �� i 4.ff. , r HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. LS. N0. 45893 4 9 g`� 34.ft, z N < _--- ' $.\ �' ` 29' °1s �° ,> ; _ FOLANDS :� w r >' ` �' . IH i �v7 '\ y0 ?-41�` r ' r m ,n— ' r r r :- ti rM'64 " � +' ) r �[7 DEVELOPER Bg&z LMa,fi l i i \ i 1 15li 20a•', I lr r'I/r!'r,�/ '�, ! ,',/irI'`r�: 1ri I�, I l I S f',, -1 m ! DID FORESTBROOK BUILDERS S INC. �NOG 3PENNYLANE9p 6436J7 SAINT JAMES, NEW YORK 1178 0 g9 19ft.fto I 50' 3642 o o ° Q/ '-� sq.f} ' .y c rn a .v o w 4 SUBDIVISION MAP OF 466 ���1• 5 FORE$TBROOK AT BAYVIEW 0 I Ir 1 I now or formarl m ” sq-ff, I y' j TI`S Robert M_ McCarthy AE Mara R. McCarthy At Bayview, Town of Southold %'! lz' • / Sss f ? Suffolk County, New York 7177 County P mme Tax Ma i 1000 sedlaa 79 111.& m l.& 02 L 7 R `° F� ° l 'o;//��'•% /iri,� '� O',o / _ CLUSTER SKETCH PLAN - rn ° s FFR" °a IASI SEPT. zi, zcol MAP PREPARED MAY. 3, 2001 - titi OCT 10 2001 �:S� JOB 1" = 100' 1, rf�' 1J, JOB N0. 2001-0145 � - Q = MONUMENT SEi MUNUMENi FOUND 8 Si.1KE SET A= Si„{E I.ND Southold Town DWG. 2001_0145_cl uaterl4 Planning Board I,�I " LOCATION MAP SCALE:1"=60d I 7y _ I R b a I ZONING UI DI61RIai LAFIDwARO LlFlli OF rreEsmvAT WELANDDS DIffNEATEO A_a OY formerly IN SEPT 1999 / d o O W I now CO 6Y 115E / Peconic Land Y ( NI,, Trust .a 1 \ 570'48'10'•E oP o � 71 Q a w U 740.30' \ o I 1 NORiH BAYNEW ROAD �. o � o 3 Pcjrcel C'N y A,..' ! 6p is (ARRA=Ss>scs2 ,9.F.) I I f ' o so N rt C O Ih O O Q O o LL � N ADo.Ds' 3 I f 260.00 o o 235,11' i I N6519�00nW W or formerly o o c c now Berry, Jr. d 0 George J, oC U0) o Z o0 C M lO LP 0 00 Ci -o - Lot 2 j Q) a LAFEA_651360 SF) } `L D Z ii n� °I O ry l N OO ON 1 01. i Li F O U a C U �I a Of n z 0 U) � 23511' P4rcel "A" , n �I �° 0 0 6kti I ZIi / P �O P. Lot 1 /1Ea 2 �Rr (AREA-65,360 sF•,) p tP / I N / W 236.11' LO O� /S 0 0 to /6�ry6 > a s o 0 d 0 o c (- / NI 0 Z I: I 7 7 / of NLU / Of 598.12' I � �wATER VAIN / �e aF NEwY NORTH MT eoPVL° 'F0owNER JOHN L. HURTADO, SR. k JOHN L. HURTADO, JR.P.O. BOX 1925 SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 FOLgNpS NOTE SCALE: 1"=100' 1. TOPOGRAPHICAL DATA SHOWN HEREON IS FROM SURVEY PREPARED BY JOB NO:2002-051 Sketch Prepared For: ANTHONY LEWANDOWSKI, L.S. LAST DATED NOV. 09, 2000 AND IS DATE: REVISION: REFERENCED TO TOPOGRAPHICAL MAPS "5 EASTERN TOWNS" JUNE 20, 2003 PLAN PREPARED JOHN L. HURTADO SR. & 2. WETLANDS LINE SHOWN HEREON IS FROM SURVEY PREPARED BY AUG. 04, 2003 AMENDED SKETCH ANTHONY DATED NOV, 09. 2000. 3. RE: PARCEL 1 OF SETOIFF MAPAST PREPARED FOR CHRISTINE C. HURTADO, JOHN L. HURTADO, JR. " JOHN L. HURTADO, SR.,OEBRA J. HURTADO & JOHN L. HURTADO, JR, At PREPARED BY FOX LAND SURVEYING, LAST DATED JULY 29, 2002. Bayview SITE DATA Town of TOTAL AREA 698,702 S.F. OR 16.04 ACRES Southold NUMBER OF LOTS 2 Suffolk Count New York AREA OF WETLANDS 0 S.F. y, 15% OR GREATER SLOPE 5176 S.F. OR 0.12 ACRES (0.74%) AREA LESS 15% SLOPE 693,526 S.F. OR 15.92 ACRES IDR & 1'r, ZONING USE DISTRICT R-40 $ A-C SCHOOL DISTRICT SOUTHOLD SCALE:1"=100' FIRE DISTRICT SOUTHOLD G.W.M.Z. IV FOX LAND SURVEYING Suffolk County Tax Map: UTILITIES NYNEX, LIPA PO BOX 224 Dist. 1000 Sect. 079.00 Block 0500 Lot 020.013 (ALL UTILITIES TO BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE SPEONK, N.Y. 11972 WITH THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISION REGULATIONS) (631) 325-2902 / � +J ' y' Young". 8c You, Ld'nc� 9�r�e {rsra; - 4 0 0itraryLder +ilve7pil.e RnvgrJkeltd Nleiu YorMr f JOy " t ��'1i \ - Adder W 7'otil'ie9 P E ,6 L.S 1848 199M1) t + Hotlrard IF Yo Lu.>`y4,y(nlru or LOOATIO5 MAP \ 1/ // \ _\\ ,. { Th.om.aa G, lIo?Te+'6 Prolcgb. uPflxt g;nesa { Vii' ^ra SCALE: 1'=600' N \ ' •V3 . W E Open Space Subs. ,Got Subdivision Map — "James W. Dawson° \ ✓anes�� �M°p \ \ / jE GOOSE CIIEEk s L \ ,0 9 \ I S X23 \ aW@p�.. •. r � yil, � 07. 3. F ,Su6P, [ot w p 5 J' 4 Pei G I S' C� 6 Jall •lO.. S w Op 1 3 e oP 4LWSp� .. !%/ �,�'���� r &Ol W a r f O/ O 81,?03 ' . dry 11 l� ✓pry F /}7 �y ' . � A ro I 5 p I 4 eN Ar ft It of _ trp dA� 'd� 5L PE r vr3 /�r%'/ //;�'% ���%: s 1 i "t•��` { i{ \ { ' _ . i{ ro"' \ LOT M "AREA OF 45r};OR CtRI^sA+'f R,rS4�TRE'°tx' "L, ?''1 a �•%6 /%%%' �' /�ii; 1 + g0' r' 92,0 " 2 ' St15, 9{ P8. .•{::I `' tFr ktkl`+�'>"' r W O _ 3 _ 47, 66 Stl Ft Ir a N4�C r fOr 4 3:A5b� SG Ft .J 'p Ste�erJ1' M �1�/ 17;,, 2369 �4 Ff 1 rx ✓ ��. { y { ' ' i• I � PE-IM 4 _ , 1 , r i r t r t t � { 8s 3J s \ r ryi _ e' 923 r sry . . '• NOTE s , '' ARIl OF'.16'A OR PRIl R, 1_0 TP EK0 i7:WDFT7 ` 4�y jl - V EP A5X OR�,S tiA a 1 i. ,' EO 7�O' � cEM1„•E' .ze"_' , v I pW o f '�<OPF ( .or .r v 9v N flout s. _ 1 ,. '� v 18p O�4 _'` . rr, r . &�r4'/fCPfO),/��rt �71TE '{.�A A'. 4¢ i MY,-•,a or 3> v' ? sQo a P IN s Y 70TAC ARE 3T771 Al S rr f ° r r1� +, i^ lh O/ A Ir tffi 8.6 II it II II - ;�S+�Z,h : .2+' gq'eto/ E �O�@rJ� $,OO �I IIt awl i i waJSeC'r f TOTAL NUMBER'OF ,LOTS' .i', I' V 4"4 x17:;�� re I, g 1 1 1 4 r I 1 1 n M' _y3'i I' ','I IV I I rut I v 1 z L+ +{ o� 4- J)• �N '4P ai , ; / / Mor °r 1 IV 883 . (xZS Op• y ^� . Rlg t Sp+ 3g, -- `�<0 4,0 68. P ✓ m%t/J �' • ZONINCl'USE OfSTf{ICT ACjRfCULTURAL ¢tl(;. F�'�{' a - > 5 'v '-v i \ i li>11 � �a, eL¢alHc� _ •w 23,5 `� it 'F , r ' •gO13jSOry.F, 'VFR;ICAI D'A*M ' + I 2 i i i i In,l I �, V`` ,, � tNN,L�, O • (� 10�' � 1 � �� SA �RiGyr iy. E't ', y,,, _ v+al✓`tif :4 y�xt �&1ry N r a ;;t e G �ty-SL ril UO II . i ,� �HIEH'11E1 rf } W�\ \ .A e �� � qff. r w i I 5 I '�_________ _ w / 1 •:'v', I N1r 5.5 r 'r �ty. •.��tv -a_ f r 5OIL `1,y,r,1 �ENG�IN�ER"5 E�RI�'I�'! Al � I I I I I O / � � 1 Int ` `V 1 `V 1 + •V 9� A ' � i � iVE i? ♦ l ` A` .. { 0. !FI ITI :, 1 1 N 1 O li �1 i f1T�8` 3 •��\` V`\ ` 1 ! { ^ __ . - .�{` *.. , 3�E�_ _ `;. ` ry - , - ',! +r�, sf . tf],a4 I I 1 11 I, I - II I {1 9�ff>� \ r\ 1\,' lO I _ � � 1 0`' r_-'` `\'. , ' +\•. 1 ��` :� � _"1 p t. \ t `• - + � .l„S 45Q93 jlO S R, WO�PERT N V Bf R E Nd 'o- C + i � 1' I �i, i I �Sl• r r i.' 4 1 I I 1 ,+ +\ �� � �s J� 0 '4r SUV�1lOR'SERIf 1 I ' + '�I I 11 ed,8gJ ')6 .•/ � / YO l0 /�� ��' •Gi"(ME _ ' l + IA 1 .„ �. ` {\L �/I M1•(1�2q^ -' ' II I �+ r ++ {v I � �q�a. I � i � r 11 i' _ - �"� � Jg• l 95,0116 + '• L + �' erc� _ e' �� I f1 � `� I _ O 3 I t dry Sq.f INC EN ' ' , i i "� i y 28 fi' w� r L I r + ' d HON{ARD W. .WOUNG N LS NO a 15693 \ G= z, ` I T - _. 299. r a it + I �� J4�1 S 1 V n - { li j/' - _ ' d _ s{'i r I I - n , r . 'I`� rl _ i 4T P i t, �I I rl {r w 0 REVELOPEB' ',"64" - _ : �. I itiz`� \4 I' II _ - , SCF _ IILD ^ FORESTS PENNY U�N �r� so- T r i'��I 14,, I Ise I Ip I , l3 `� I ,g , i , r i I n, � wZ,Z '� SANT JhM�'S +NEW o z 8 3 a 4,6 i ' JAB g 'a re_Im' I i i &G:: 4i rE + fei 1 8 � I§ 3 T I v i I ' � '50 { 1 II I 1 'o o s flr II n i co) qf 6 i r I `j + ✓ r _ _ Y�IIJ10i�1 M' t 1k l #1 s 'Mt.+ •v zry+t T I 'I I v I I I I " ' : '6 3 i t • 90 'S I , � ,. �� � I s° I Rinl i• lIr II 9 S - C , f C . d I l I I 1 1, now Orformerly //�� for rt 3 med 1 _ Robert y ,` 1 0�y I i I i M: McCarthy A'�', $OyVIQ1Y,iseP7''�'1 f, "�t�:`r •NL' ,a I I . I I I I I r r r mil & Moh4 R; McCarthy �. IS - . SU'FfPRC ' UM"tr, ylt fatTRIM -/N p 175• — I i t{{ 1 es` "J ''f�w� Al ., 44qiql & iq' 1' -i � - '��A 1>6• 'v 'v $ {/. �F� o I r , r M a'y° Y Y F'- q� d s� ", 11 17-k'1� {W I { � s � q RREPA �y ���y''AT n / ' ,:` A`„�pyt.{R Yme1•t3fi .�1?j, n,,y,.''rrr r" ,�ir"''{ -�hS. t, p ..,Ill WT A - uoxuuEsaM1 FPunG A. srucE R, •- srulE Fl - - _ ^'v'-'T: '1'L tF j, v , - FY .+'i p i a.•, I i F . I- '.'I ...,.ter i Young & Young, Land Surveyors 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 631-727-2303 1 LOCATION MAP ^� Alden W. Young, P.E. & L.S. (1908-1994) SCALE: 1"=600 \ Howard W. Young, Land Suroeyor \ ` 1 Thomas C. WoEpert, Professional Engineer a� W \ Open Space / S4bpiI/ 2 Gat \` Subdivision Map — "James W. Dawson" ✓o'Oes siory a� s \ \ II Op op µ GeOEE CREEI( , S ` £3a _--- --- 2pj0.3„ e S46 t Co \ ° p o mn o o� S 6j ✓ io 1 \ 8 \ \ LO °^ , >2.I , Ip.hfs w Dp p ) 54 F wsory / 1 \ N hOw \\ ' ------ 1' o, o �' Dh or f , i rO & L/ O/d F ar(her/ / 76 I 1 1 ------x` ' /VOor a¢§§¢S ? j rycy S`fOrnJe €yx8 NSM i i i i ' , = ---- - n I I24 , I I S6 zs_- 3 '- ♦ /`ro 1I (ry w or c; 1 � n -3 - I 1 8. re fworw ry � P BSer SITE DATA o04/ for psey o'E/ 07e TOTAL AREA 37.771 ACRES /Y,/ r/y p%p@M O • TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS =. 17 7bC4 7, Z - /� - i�I♦i'I .\I�\\\`�1 \`,`,`\` ,)1'�—ze <No678p37>12>,2q• W % N4�• NN N i '1�//. i '�1 . I Oho' y; �•9/'0 >SQOr'wfill) Ur ✓p fpGr'r\ ryer /Ca20p, OrbOrOS�%th3906 ) ' o CL 0p• R/Gyr pbr10/ I ' I i i I I ' 1 - ' 1 ' ' I ♦ x Oso 4" • ZONING USE DISTRICT = AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION 4 UBle W4r r 1 S r 7,0 > �e 0, VERTICAL DATUM = N.G.V. DATUM (M.S.L. 1929) 24 u 9• 4aE @, N `♦ S sea 11 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 289p /_____ ` f. ,I ♦♦ Oa �Qcre9 50' 0�j D. i LL I i I ------------- IN C� Q- 1 y c� S� �N ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION II II II II I ", I � � � I ' �.:' ' " � ` � � ` , _ '_7§T1 -.a'' ♦:`♦\ N �a� 'i N I i ,/ ' ♦ .� 70 d 112p �0• ro - Cd , l 1 I 1 _ i ' T� 10 1 OF NEt-yY if I 1 II , ,, Illllr u� ,1 1 I I ,+♦ , r F ' ` 40209 l s S q'ft. ,' l I I 0 I I I �_ __ i i ft., 111 i ' i II ' S ♦� ' ' / I r 9 1 ' ` `, � `I ♦ HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.B. L.S. N0. 458 6+1�an� ' O 1 , I ` M �` 1 - ' ----- I I THOMAS C. WOLPERT, N.Y.S. P.E. 1 1 y I / I i , N /n _ ----- --- -----__ �FE8810NP I :, ,0p -_'(' 48,6 o I 'I s3 s 9.ft ,1 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION , / \ j I '�, I , , � 'sr�/ k'P ` i \%� O"� • 39' _ '' � I / ' h0 ' i I - I 10 lea• 09 / n NED1rY 5 s9'ft. PI'_ o'_ 6 <' .' `i I' lI 4 6 1 u+ I ry I z m \ '� ,., _�' x 1h ` 4 >�9' 1 "e; - _ _ _ _ - , 4.69Y S 1 a. I •y O h r 8,70 ffs9.ft, -.- •O a ' `� , i HOWARD W. YOUNG, N. .S. L.S. NO. 4589 45893 �4� 2 N 17 i I I /1,a - -` n ♦♦♦`i ' ^`� 1� ' zS i'^ j 29' ` 9 / 5�,♦ 019, o I I) ' � •_'I I I I I Y 11 A /I i / .♦o• , II �� ` ♦ O �� ' v i Yea 0 DEVELOPER Ec I � D � FORESTBROOK BUILDERS INC. 1901 I I% II 6� 1T 1t ' SyJ8�5 ` m xo�ZO�SF 3 PENNY LANE 1 1 4389 9sq•f. - — SAINT JAMES, NEW YORK 11780 S tq 0� 4 _ 1 dri i / ,}� r 1 / I 9•ft. ' I ' 11 / 0 2 1 , 3 L C 1 , c° cn,f 1 d /' ' ����:/ . O-� � i I 11 I �� � r>"-__` `g9• ` ' C i � h EC/ I „ ,/ i. I I , .♦ , 1 ,.I 1 , 1 ___ __ D SUBDIVISION MAP OF ' ����/ /�% ��_—- __ �.,�0§. ' � I ice '' In.♦ `�, I % 5466 0 now or formers 4 �z . s FORESTBROOK AT BAYVIE,W ° I Il I 19.ft. r I I Y e 1 m y , , ,♦♦ I Robert M. McCarthy / > & Mona R. McCarthy `Z At Bayview, Town of Southold fir( 1' v 5�556 � 1, ) i $q,ft Suffolk County, New York VSE1 County Tax MCP olso-m11000 secIloN 79 elMI,x 02 sol 7 CLUSTER SKETCH PLAN samba 3 O O o JOE � MAP PREPARED MAY. 3, 2001 vi ..l�l�EM•.� WY L11U1 SCALE 1" = 100' CSP JOB NO. 2001-0145 E) MONUMENT SET MONUMENT FOUND 0 STONE SET A= DEANS FOUND DWG. 2001_0145_'clusterl4