The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-76.-3-34.2 & 36RECEIVED BY P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY July 13, 1987 11947 Ms. Diane Schultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Schultze: Pursuant to our telephone conversation today, I request on behalf of Mr. Dennis Corby, as application for his subdivision on Depot Lane and C.R.48, Cutchogue, New York, that this matter be placed on hold until such time as the Master Plan and the Zoning Ordinances are adopted. On the basis of this request, I application be processed as early as to the adoption of the Master Plan. would ask that this feasible, subsequent $~ncerely, HER:ml CC: Dennis Corby James F. Clarke, Esq. N. COUNTRY RD. · BOX 36~ WADING RIVER. N.Y. u792 (5~6) 929 3575 #une 23, /?87 Piann£n~ Board Town off,5ou~hoid Sou~hoZd Town #ali $outloid, #.Y. //?7/ ~ttn: Ar. Bennett tile EnvL~onm~nt- ALno~ ~u~LdLvLakon - ~owman e~.ai. Dear Ar. Oriowa/eL: EnvLronment" Laaued relatLve to ~tLa projec~ on ~une I, It &a o~vLoua ~rom tie atatementa conta£ncd document flat tie reaaon foe ~ie poaLtLve determLnatLon La tie Aa~ I~, /?87 correaoondenc¢ ~rom Aa. LouLae #ar~Laon, ~uffoik C~unt~ O[~Lce o~ E~olo~u to'tie ~outioZd Town ?ZannLn¢ Board (co?y attac~ed?. - ~ fiat tie eoncguaLona contaLned wLti~n tie ~ro~ect ?fLor to Laau~n~ ie~ rcvLew. ?¢na~L$ed foe aaLd Tie correct Lnfo~matLon re~atLv¢ to tie aLte~a and ?~o~¢ct deaL~n are aa /.~ Aa. #a~Laon aaae~ta flat tie ~ocatLon and extent of tie TLdai ~¢t~anda ~o~nd at tie aLt¢ lave not not Laaue a ?ermLt ~o~ eonat~uctLon untL~ tie 7-~ai ~etian~a iLne kaa 6een marked Ln tie /Lei~ o located 3~ a aurve~or and verL~Led ~v a ~a~ o~ L~ ~. ~rqL~on .had cfiecked.wL~~ ~aLd a~encv, and baaed on fLegd obaer~, recommended ?ro?oaed LmprovemenL gocaLLona be modLfLed ~ Upon aubmLaaLon of ~toae modL~LcaLLona, a AddLLLonagZy, ] tare agao encZo~ed a geLLer #.Y.S.B.~.C. LndLehLLn~ ~taL Lie ?reaehL #.Y.~.~.~.C. ?ermLL auLtorLgea Lie aubdLvLaLon and and ~n fuZZ effecL aa ~. #ar~LaL~n deLermgned Lf ate tad ~aken Lie Lkme Lo make one ?tone cai2. by Ptra~mLLea commun~a axe weLganda under drLLcge 25 o.~te 77 of Lie Code of Lie ~own of 5ou~toLd (weLgandaJ. ~tra~mi~ea axe indgcaLora of a LtLa care, dredge apoLg de?oakLgonJ and weLZanda. ;tey axe found on 40~ undLaLurbed ve~eLa~Lve buffer wLZg remaLn beLween Lie ZLmLLa of fLgZ an~ Lie approved for conaLrucLLon on dredge aFoL2 areaa. Lie [own of ~ouLtoid Aaa approved many ~. #arrL~on menLLona LtaL tier a~ency war awaLLLn~ en~Lneera revLewLn~ our projecL aL Lie ~.C. #eaiLt BeparLmenL £nLende~ Lo L~au~ aaLd approval upon ececpL o~ a covenanL Lo be ftc/ed on Lte Ln~£v~duai ZoLa. 5a~d covenanL war rec~nLiy ~gied wkLt Lte Suffolk CounLy Clerk and a copy au3m~LLed Lo Lie kmpacL Lie ~ooae Creek a~a~em ~r agLe weLl'nde. for on a£Le aan~Lary d~apoaai ayaLema axe meL aa en~£neer any doer noL even Lnfo-~-~-~he Board of ~he opLnLona held b~ her own a~enc~a ~. garrLaon~rovLdea ie~L~Lma~e concern for pro~ec~Lon of.wetland areaa from eroaLon and aLi~a~Lon bo~h prLor ~o and after cona~ruc~Lon. ~ele?hone and ark abou~ eroaLon con,roi meaaurea buLi~ Ln~o ~he pro~ec~ dea~n. If abe had been appr~aed o~ ~he -ga~balea are ~o be placed alon~ ~he ~ed~e o~ fL~i~ /Lne ?fLor ~o ~LZi depoaL~Lon rna cona~ruc~Lon. -The a~andard ~o~ ve~ela~Lve a~abLiL~a~Lon o~ exceed / on 3. Our pro~ec~-deaL~n -~pon de?oaL~Lon o~ fLZi ma~erLai, pro~ec~ deaL~n crL~erLa calla for ~radLn~ ~o be dLrec~i~ b~ ~ee~Ln~-wL~h ~ow nu~r'Len~ demand "Fui~a~'. bald aee~Ln~ wLii 6e ~ollowed b~ ?iacemen~ o~ ~'d~XCO# wood exce/aLor to~aii~ rea~rLct ~urf areaa on ~o~ #/ and iLmL~ ~ur~ ~o ~hoae aec~Lona LmmedLa~ei~ ad~oLnLn~ Lm?rovemen~a on ~o~ #2. demand a?ecke~ ~o reduce uae of ?ea~kckdea and dk~ch ~a~ ex~enda ~o~ard~ ~a~n Ba~v~ew ~oad, ~ac~ aa a draLn for a auba~an~Lai por~L~n o~ io~ ~2~. ~oea ha. #ahrLaon reai~e ~ha~ aa£d d~ch dkd no~ even ex~ un~i ap~rox~ma~ei] 6 mon~ha apo when war cona~ruc~ed wL~Aou~ ?ermkaa~on b~ her own acencg? ha. #arrkaon m~Tq~--ff~e alao found o~ ~ha~ a ie~er had been ~aaued 6~ her-de?ar~men~ ~rofeaaLonai wL~hLn her own dcgar~men~ doer no~ /e~L~Lma~e concerna rc/a~Lve ~o ~e Lnven~orLed -3- ~e~iand~ ~ound a~ ~e ~L~¢, ~e ~Aouid modL~ ~e ?olLcLe~ o~ ~er own de~a~men~ ~Lc~ con- a~auc~¢d a poa~Lon o~ ~e ndL~c~' dLnec~i] ~rou~ a fiL~ vaZue ma~fi, de~ro~Ln~ ~L~nL~Lcan~ ~an[~ o~ ve3e~a~gve ~Ldai we~ian~. 5.; File cioaLn$ recommenda~ona contained fie~ correspondence flare ai~ead~ ~ecn addressed wL~Ln ~e ~amewo~ o~ ~fi¢ ~.Y. 5.~.E.£. and 5. C.#.D.~. ~evLew. dddL~Lonaliy ~L~ da~a wfio L~ued a nne~a~Lve decia~a~Lon' on ~L~ Lden~Lca/ ?ro]ec~. ~fiL~ ne~a~Lve deciara~Lon wa~ ~fie ~e~ui~ o~ a com~efien~Lve ~evLew N.Y.~.B.~.£. ~a~f and ~own Pianngn~ Board would o?Ln~on reia~Lve ~o w¢Ciand In cio~Ln~, ~ would re~p¢c~uil~ r¢~ue~ ~Lvcn ~fie erroneou~ ffune l, l~7, ~a~ ~e Board recon~kder ~ de~ermgna~on. d~ always, I would 6e ?iea~ed ~o ?rovgde add~ona2 da~a Encio~ure~ cc: C~arle~ F. #amgi~on $~e~e Co~a ~obert ~reene ~Lcfie¢i ~o~rande New York St~e.D~pa~mpnt of Requlatory ~TTB~rS unit Bldg. 40, SUNY, Rm. 219 Stony Brook, NY 11794 (~1~) 751-7~00 Environmental Conservation Henry G. Williams Commissioner June 11, 1987 Mr. Charles W. Bovanan The Land Use Co. Box 361, North Country Rd. Wading River, NY 11792 Re: Permit # 10-85-1218 SCTM # 1000-078-07-5.2 Dear ~4r. Rowman: We have examined the location for the sanitary system as net site plan prepared by Howard W. Young, licensed surveyor, and last dated March 20, 1987. The location of the sanitary system as shown on the site plan is hereby approved since it is located landward of the single family dwellingSand greater than 100' from the tidal wetland boundary as required by Special Condition 1 of your permit. Stncerly yours, Alfred T, Kellar Deputy Regional Permit Administrator ATK:jf COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Michael A. LoGrande DAVIO HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. May 14, 1987 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 RE: Subdivision Application of Charles Bowman SCTM: 1000-78-7-5.2 Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received your letter of April 14, 1987, regarding the above-referenced application and has no objection to your designation as lead agency. We have reviewed the information provided with your following comments regarding Sanitary Code compliance concerns. letter and submit the and natural resources I. Sanitary Code An application for realty subdivision was filed with our agency on September 24, 1985, and has been revised several times. Health Department staff is evaluating the survey revision of March 20, 1987, and awaiting "final submission" information from the applicant. Our agency will not make a final decision on this application until all requirements of the Sanitary Code have been fulfilled. The Health Department maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sanitary systems. Therefore, the applicant should not undertake the construc- tion of any such system without SCDHS approval. The applicant's test hole data indicates that groundwater levels are elevated on the site. This condition is not conducive to the proper functioning of individual subsurface disposal systems constructed pursuant to the general design specifications of SCDHS. II. Natural Resources Suffolk County Office of Ecology staff visited the subject site on May 5, -, to Bennett Orlowski ay 14, 1987 page 2 1987. We submit the following comments and recommendations. A. The site contains three distinct areas of productive intertidal marsh dominated by salt marsh cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) and salt ha (~ ~)...These. areas appear to Corres~ the "wet~" shown on ~ne applicant's survey. The designated wetlands dj'~j~ however, accurately depict the full extent of the site's wetlands, only those areas dominated by Spartina grasses. We have no evidence that the wetland boundary shown on any surVEy has been approved by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). Other portions of the property (primarily sea-ward of the 5-foot contour elevations) contain saturated, highly organic, bog soils dominated by Common Reed, (Phragmites communis). The areas dominated by Spartina grasses provid~ valuable ~fe habitat, and contribute organic nutrients to the marine environ- ment. The wetlands area dominated by common Reed provide a buffer to the wetland and wildlife from the impacts of human activity and provide limited nutrient production to Goose Creek. Protection of these areas is a primary concern on the subject parcel. The site's tidal wetlands are regulated by NYSDEC. The delineation of all wetland boundaries should be approved by the NYSDEC's Division of Marine Resources and indicated as such on the property survey. We feel that no ' , approval actions should be taken on this application until the tidal wetland ~-_ boundary has been approved by NYSD£C. '~t On January 5, 1987, the project sponsor received a State tidal wetlands permit for a 2-lot subdivision plan dated June 10,. 1985. The applicant has subsequently revised the subdivision design four times, and changed the proposed locations of fill deposition, sanitary systems, wells, and one of the dwelling units. The most recent subdivision plan (March 20, 1987) no longer depicts the information upon which NYSDEC granted its permit approval. As we understand it, the revised plans render the NYSDEC permit invalid. Our agency will not take any action on subdivision approval until NYSDEC reevaluates the current subdivision plan and informs us of their determination. We support the full protection of on-site wetlands and encourage the imposition of maximum wetland setbacks on any proposed clearing, construc- tion, or filling. B. The proposed amount of fill wi · increases the likelihood ~f ~ ~_~[~at.ion. of .~lop~s greater than 10% '~ protect the tidal wetland~ fj~j,.~j~_l~_~ur~n.g s~e o~yelopment. To best · :u~m~nLaLlOn impacts, the applicant should ~ consider creation of slopes of less than 10%. Ne request review of a ~ detailed erosion conLrol plan for the project. Because the reduction in / slope may require additional encroachment into regulated areas, the / applicant should consider a smaller structural design for proposed dwell- Lings. ^ row of staked hay bales should be mai ' "-~?ch f111 mound throu bout sit _nta~n~d ~round the base of · g e development. The erosion Daffier should not oe removed unt~l all construction and final landscaping is complete. ~to ~]enneLt Orlowskl C. High-maintenance landscaping and managed turf should be minimized to reduce potential impacts from lawn chemical runoff to tidal wetlands. We recommend the use of soil stabilizing plants wherever possible on this site. Post-development protection of tidal wetlands can be benefited by the placement of deed covenants and restrictions on each of the lots. We recommend that a natural vegetative buffer be maintained from the base of all proposed fill to Goose Creek, with provisions only for limited boating and pedestrian access to Goose Creek. The two-foot drainage ditch indicated on the survey extends landward in a westerly direction to a point approximately 25-50 feet from Main Bayview Road. The ditch should be represented accurately on the subdivision plan. The channel acts as a drain for a substantial portion of Lot #2 and will be partially eliminated by the fill mound proposed on this lot. Any impacts of this action should be fully addressed by the applicant. III. Recommendations eperl,The subject property is composed largely of saturated soils and contains substantial tidal wetlands that are valuable to the productivity of GOose Creek. At this time, we are concerned principally about the protection of on-site tidal wetlands from erosion, sedimentation, and pollution impacts assOciated with site development. The project sponsor should obtain a revised or new Article 25 mit from NYSDEC, based on the most current proposal. ~. ~ As you evaluate this project, please address your attention to the following: 1. DEC-approved delineation of tidal wetland boundaries 2. DEC-approval for revised plan 3. Maximum protection of tidal wetlands 4. Erosion control measures during construction 5. Low-maintenance and soil-stabilizing landscaping 6. Potential impacts of filling drainage channel ~- Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at your convenience. Sincerely, , / Louise W. Harrison Supervisor, Bureau of Environmental Management Office of Ecology LWH/ta CC: Vito Minei Steve Costa Robert Greene, NYSDEC Charles Hamilton, NYSDEC Due to analysis presented here we will need a new submission, the current application faces certain denial. SEQRA review fee to be $2,000 Part 2--PROJ~I' IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGN~tDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the q9 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column q. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? [:]NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will c~ntinue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t~. _..~y urilque or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e,, cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)~lNO [:]YES · Specific land forms: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] ~ -~J~] Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I-qNo [] [] E3¥es []No [] [] []Yes []No 6 IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected.~ (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) [:]NO D~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: Excess filling on land subject to tidal flooding (former tidal wetland) 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water.~ rqNO rqYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity~ ~INO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will~equire a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will atlow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runofff I~NO [][YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] - []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] •Yes []No [] [] ~-]Yes r-JNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes ~lNo [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? I~NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? E3NO Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: Possible species impact 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? Possible [3NO g;]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest {over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ][]NO CIYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) I ~ 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I'~ Yes ['-I No [] [] r'XiYes [-INo [] E~ r-~Yes []No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 8 · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? r~NO ~IYE5 (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. 0I'[ Lot 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enioyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. On T,ot 2 · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: On T.ot 2 IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ~]NO E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 I~NO I~YES · The foreclosure of future recreational permanent a opportunity. ~ A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: Residential construction or land designated as open space on the I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes I~No [] [] E~Yes I~No [] [] E~Yes' I~No [] [] []Yes r-INo ~ ~ ~es ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No gl~.a~ ~ ~Yes ~No land us( 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? :~.N O ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action wilt result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [~NO FqYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ~ E~O []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,50~ feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts:. IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ][3NO [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact ProJect Change [] [] [-']Yes ]'~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ' []Yes []No [] [] J-]Yes r-]No [] [] [-']Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ['-]Yes [-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []NO [] [] []Yes []No 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Examples that would apply to column 2 rXNO E~YES · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures · or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [-]Yes ~]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [-']No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts~ [~NO OYES Not as of this date 15 June 1987 If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitil~ated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable} how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 BOWMAN AT BAYVIEW June 15,1987 1. IMPACT ON LAND Growndwater will be intercepted unless construction is placed on fill. The entire 7.024 acre premises is located in a FIRM A-4 zone subject to flooding. Base flood elevation is +8' MSL. Septic systems as shown will flood out and fail at less than the 100 year storm as will the proposed wells. Thus, the project can not be ~built as shown on the plans dated 4 April 1986 and still function as a viable residential development of two lots. 3. IMPACT ON WATER As a result of 1 above, greater amounts of fill will have to be placed on the premises than the plan shows. Either a true depiction of the necessary fill must be shown on a new plan or denial of the submitted plan must take place. No discharge permit has been applied for. No evidence has been submitted that there is potable water on site. Septic flows, fertilizers, household chemicals are to be introduced into groundwater extremely close to Goose Creek and its associated wetlands. Drainage flows will be altered. Flood plain will be filled. No compensatory designs for either problem have been submitted. 8. PLANTS AND ANIMALS Possible impacts on threatened and endangered species may occur. Documentation is needed. 11. AESTHETIC IMPACT Lot 2 currently is wetland and tidal flood plain. The introduction of a dwelling on a large mound of fill with a minimum grade level of +8'MSL and a roofline at +43' MSL will significantly alter a local scenic resource. 12. OPEN SPACE The premises is designated as Open Space on the Southold Master Plan. Construction of two dwellings will constitute a destruction of the open space at this locale. Additional items of concern are noted on the Notice of Significant Effect, dated 1 June 1987 attached. David Emilita, Planner to the Board, 15 June 1987 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT June 1, 1987 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action described below is Unlisted and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION : This proposal is for a subdivision of 7.02 acres into two residential lots. This proposal is located at Main Bayview Road, Southold; applicant is Charles Bowman, tax map no. 1000-76-3-34.2 and 36; 1000-78-7-3,4, and 5. REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION : 1. There is concern with protecting the areas of wetland on the property. The site contains three distinct areas of productive intertidal marsh as well as, saturated, highly organic, bog soils dominated by Common Reed. The areas dominated by Spartina grasses provide valuable wildlife habitat and contribute organic nuturients to the marine environment. The wetlands area dominated by common Reed provide a buffer to the wetland and wildlife from the impacts of human activity an dprovide limited nutrient production to Goose Creek. 2. There is concern with regard to the propsoed amount of fill and the cration of slopes greater than 10% which increases the likelihood of fill erosion during site development. 3. The substantial by the fill addressed. channel on th e~remises acts as a drain for a portion of Lot'#2 and will be partially elminated proposed for this lot. This impact should be 4. The saturated soils and substantial tidal wetlands are valuable to the productivity of Goose Creek. on-site impacts There is principal concern about the protection of tidal wetlands from erosion, sedimentation, and pollution associated with development. 6. The Town of Southold Trustees note that the site has several species of wetland vegetation flourishing on the prop~erty (saltwart, sea lavander, groundsel and cordgrass). And, the southern lot has been hydralically filled. 7. The Town of Southold Board of Appeals are concerned with the deliniation of saltwater and freshwater wetlands below the 5' contour and the grasses (as defined by Chapter 970 fthe Zoning Code) which exist in areas close to the road and towards the proposed construction sites and the impact of filing on these areas. 8. There is c~cern with the accuracy of the survey with regard to tdelianation of wetland boundaries and whether they have been approved by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation; as well as the validity of the Department of Environmental Conservation Permit since the subdivision survey has been revised since it was granted. Further informatino may be obtained by contacting Diane M. Schultze, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk county Planning Commission NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Henry Williams, DEC Commissioner Charles Bowman, applicant and agent Supervisor Murphy To~ Trustees T~ Board of Appeals vDavid Emilita, Planning Consultant . . FILE COPY T~LD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July 15, 1987 Mr. Charles W. Bowman Land Use Company P.O. Box 361 North Country Road Wading River, NY 11792 Re: Bowman, et. al minor subdivision at Southold, SCTM # 1000-76-3-34.2,3; 1000-78-7-3,4,5 Dear Mr.-Bowman: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, July 6, 1987. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept and request compliance with Part II and Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form prepared by Planning Consultant, David Emilita, with regard to the minor subdivision for Charles W. Bowman, located at Main Bayview Road, Southold as an initial scoping product and forward same to the applicant, Charles W. Bowman, pursuant to item #4in the Board resolution of June 1, 1987. As per the above resolution, enclosed is a copy of the Part ii and III which was prepared by Planning Consultant, David Emilita. Due to the analysis presented here, the Board will need a new submission , the current application faces certain denial. Would you please, also, at your earliest convenience. to be $2,000. forward the SEQRA review fee This fee has been determined If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. ~_ Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Diane M. Schultze, Secretary Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 8, 1987 Mr. Charles W. Bowman Land Use Company P.O. Box 361 North Country Road Wading River, NY 11792 Re: Bowman et.al. minor subdivision Dear Mr. Bowman; The following action was taken by the Southoid Town Planning Board, Monday, June 1, 1987. Whereas, "Charles W. Bowman" has applied to the Southold Town Planning Board for a subdivision for 2 lots on 7.02 acre located at main Bayview Road, Southold (application Bowman, et.al.) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1; That pursuant tot he provision of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules, and Regulations, and'Chpater 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Soutohld Town Planning Board as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action proposed is Unlisted and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Planning Board shall file and circulate such determination as required by the aforementioned law, rules and code. '3. That the Planning Board immediately notify the applicant, Charles W. Bowman of this determination, and further request said applicant to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with the scope and contents required by the Planning Board and Planning Consultant, all in accordance with said iaw,/~u~es and cOde. 4. An initial scoping produce and SEQRA fee determination, - Charles W. Bowman Page 2 6/8/87 pursuant to Chapter 44, Section 20 of the Town Code, will be forwarded as soon as it is determined. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, NNETT ORLOWSKI, JR· , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD enc. By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary Part 2--1~bJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR I~GNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever I~ossible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than e~ample, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? E3NO J~3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground Surface. · Construction that will c~ntinue for more than I year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t(.....y unique or unusual land forms found on - the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formationS, etc.)E3NO []YES · Specific land forms: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes i--INo [] ~ -~Yes []No ~-] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes f-iNo [] [] []Ye~ []No ~ ~ ~ Y e s ~ No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ' ~No ~ ~ ~Yes IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) I~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: ~.×¢e$$ filling on land subject to tidal flooding (former tidal wetland) 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? I-]NO [qYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area 9f any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts;_ 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? [qNO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will-require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system, · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the ~xtent that there wilt be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates comrnercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? I-1NO Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ? ~' 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact BE Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Chang~ [] [] [-]Yes i-]No [] [] - I--lyes I--INo [] [] I--JYes [:]No [] [] I--lyes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] J-]Yes [-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] '~ DYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] I~ DYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [~ ~/] Yes I--]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ~]Yes []No [] [] E3Yes [:]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ~]Ye~ []No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality~ r~NO r~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed ~ lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use? · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? i~NO ]~'ES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: Possible species impact 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? Possible [qNO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or misratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 WEll the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? 33NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 1-' 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] r~Yes []No [] [] I~Yes r-]No [] E~ . [~Yes I--]No [] EEl. []Yes E]No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~INO [:]YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples tha~would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. O/1 T.ot 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources_which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. On got 2 · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: On Lot 2 IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ~]NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply t? column 2 []NO [~YES C · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A maior reductio~ of an open space important to the Community. ~ Other impacts: Residential construction or land designated as open space on the I 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ~lyes i--INo [] [] . [-]Yes i--INo [] [] i-]Yes' ~--~No [] [] I--lyes []No [] [] [~Yes []No [] [] ~Yes []No [] [] ! :~Yes []No [] [] E3Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ~Yes E3No [] [] []Yes [] [] F-lyes []No [] [] []Yes []No pla[]n. [] I~lyes ~ ~]No land us~ 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. WiJJ there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Examples that would apply to column 2 E~YES · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [~NO El]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than $0 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? - E~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1~5~-feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural harriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ~[]NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. Oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact BE Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ~]Yes J--INo [] [] []Yes J-]No [] I~ ' t--I Yes []No [] [] []Yes ~]No [] [] []Yes i-~No [] [] E]Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes t~No [] [] []Yes [] [] J-qYes [-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] J~ []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] l--lyes []N0' [] [] []Yes. J-]No 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? [~NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or e[iminate employment: · Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I-~Yes []No [] []' []Yes []No [] [] []Ye~" []No [] [] I-lyes []No [] [] []Yes ['-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I--lYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? r'4NO EgYES Not as of this date 15 June 1987 If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared i{ one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. ' To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known obiections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 · BOWMAN AT BAYVIEW June 15,1987 1. IMPACT ON LAND Growndwater will be intercepted unless construction is placed on fill. The entire 7.024 acre premises is located in a FIRM A-4 zone subject to flooding. Base flood elevation is +8' MSL. Septic systems as shown will flood out and fail at less than the 100 year storm as will the proposed wells. Thus, the project can not be built as shown on the plans dated 4 April 1986 and still function as a viable residential development of two lots. 3. IMPACT ON WATER As a result of 1 above, greater amounts of fill will have to be placed on the premises than the plan shows. ELther a true depiction of the necessary fill must be shown on a new plan or denial of the submitted plan must take place. No discharge permit has been applied for. No evidence has been submitted that there is potable water oD site. Septic flows, fertilizers, household chemicals are to be introduced into groundwater extremely close to Goose Creek and its associated wetlands. Drainage flows will be altered. Flood plain will be filled. No compensatory designs for either problem have been submitted. 8. PLANTS AND ANIMALS Possible impacts on threatened and endangered species may occur. Documentation is needed. 11. AESTHETIC IMPACT Lot 2 currently is wetland and tidal flood plain. The introduction of a dwelling on a large mound of fill with a minimum grade level of +8'MSL and a roofline at +43' MSL will significantly alter a local scenic resource. 12. OPEN SPACE The premises is designated as Open Space on the Southold Master Plan. Construction of two dwellings will constitute a destruction of the open space at this locale. Additional items of concern are noted on the Notice of Significant Effect, dated 1 June 1987 attached. David Emili~ta, Planner to the Board, 15 June 1987 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT June 1, 1987 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, does'~ereby determine that the action described below is Unlisted and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION : This proposal is for a subdivision of 7.02 acres into two residential lots. This proposal is located at Main Bayview Road, Southold; applicant is Charles Bowman, tax map no. 1000-76-3-34.2 and 36; 1000-78-7-3,4, and 5. REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION : 1. There is concern with protecting the areas of wetland on the property. The site contains three distinct areas of productive intertidal marsh as well as, saturated, highly organic, bog soils dominated by Common Reed. The areas dominated by Spartina grasses provide valuable wildlife habitat and contribute organic nuturients to the marine environment. The wetlands area dominated by common Reed provide a buffer to the wetland and wildlife from the impacts of human activity an dprovide limited nutrient production to Goose Creek. 2. There is concern with regard to the propsoed amount of fill and the cration of slopes greater than 10% which increases the likelihood of fill erosion during site development~ 3. The channel on th epremises acts as a drain for a substantial portion of Lot #2 and will be partially elminated by the fill proposed for this lot. This impact should be addressed. 4. The saturated soils and substantial tidal wetlands are valuable to the prodUCtivity of Goose Creek. 5. There is principal concern about the protection on-site tidal wetlands from eros.ion, sedimentation, and impacts associated with development. of pollution 6. The Town of Southold Trustees note that the site has several species of wetland vegetation flourishing on the propoerty (saltwart, sea lavander, groundsel and cordgrass). And, the southern lot has been hydralically filled. 7. The Town of Southold Board of Appeals are concerned with the deliniation of saltwater and freshwater wetlands below the 5' contour and the grasses (as defined by Chapter 970 fthe Zoning Code) which exist in areas close to the road and towards the proposed construction sites and the impact of filing on these areas. 8. There is cocern with the accuracy of the survey with regard to tdelianation of wetland boundaries and whether they have been approved by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation; as well as the validity of the Department of Environmental Conservation Permit since the subdivision survey has been revised since it was granted. Further informatino may be obtained by contacting Diane M. Schultze, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk county Planning Commission NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Henry Williams, DEC Commissioner Charles Bowman, applicant and agent Supervisor Murphy Tow~ Trustees T~n Board of Appeals vDavid Emilita, Planning Consultant Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT June 1, 1987 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action described below is Unlisted and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION : This proposal is for a subdivision of 7.02 acres into two residential lots. This proposal is located at Main Bayview Road, Southold; applicant is Charles Bowman, tax map no. 1000-76-3-34.2 and 36; 1000-78-7-3,4, and 5. REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION : 1. There is concern with protecting the areas of wetland on the property. The site contains three distinct areas of productive intertidal marsh as well as, saturated, highly organic, bog soils dominated by Common Reed. The areas dominated by Spartina grasses provide valuable wildlife habitat and contribute organic nuturients to the marine environment. The wetlands area dominated by common Reed provide a buffer to the wetland and wildlife from the impacts of human activity an dprovide limited nutrient production to Goose Creek. 2. There is concern with regard to the propsoed amount of fill and the cration of slopes greater than 10% which increases the likelihood of fill erosion during site development. 3. The channel on th epremises acts as a drain for a substantial portion of Lot 92 and will be partially elminated by the fill proposed for this lot. This impact should be addressed. 4. The saturated soils and substantial tidal wetlands are valuable to the productivity of Goose Creek. on-site impacts There is principal concern about the protection of tidal wetlands from erosion, sedimentation, and pollution associated with development. 6. The Town of Southold Trustees note that the site has several species of wetland vegetation flourishing on the propoerty (saltwart, sea lavander, groundsel and cordgrass). And, the southern lot has been hydralically filled. 7. The Town of Southold Board of Appeals are concerned with the deliniation of saltwater and freshwater wetlands below the 5' contour and the grasses (as defined by Chapter 970 fthe Zoning Code) which exist in areas close to the road and towards the proposed construction sites and the impact of filing on these areas. 8. There is cocern with the accuracy of the survey with regard to tdelianation of wetland boundaries and whether they have been approved by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation; as well as the validity of the Department of Environmental Conservation Permit since the subdivision survey has been revised since it was granted. Further informatino may be obtained by contacting Diane M. Schultze, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk county Planning Commission NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Henry Williams, DEC Commissioner Charles Bowman, applicant and agent Supervisor Murphy Town Trustees Town Board of Appeals David Emilita, Planning Consultant GARRI=TT A. STRANG ARCHITECT RECEIVED BY SOtlTliOLD BOARD July 13, 1987 MAIN ROAD, P, O. BOX 1412 $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK 1 1971 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Planning Board of Southold Town Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Drainage Design Criteria Dear Mr. Orlowski and Members of the Board: I have recently received a copy of a memo from Mr. Bryer, the Town Planning Consultant, in which he advo- cates that the Board accept site plans for commercial development, which have drainage designed for an an- ticipated 6" rainfall in a 24 hour period. I would like to go on record as objecting to this condi- tion, inasmuch as this design criteria is not applicable to building development site plans. An across the board increase to 6" without taking into account the subsur- face conditions, which provide excellent drainage in this geographic area, is inappropriate. The generally accepted standard in Southold Town and surrounding townships, is to design for 2" rainfall containment. To arbitrarily increase the containment by 300% is grossly unfair and poses economic hardship on the applicants. I trust the Board will reconsider this recommendation of the Planning Consultant, prior to the need for a public hearing in connection with a Code change. GAS/b cc: Town Board Very truly yours, l-garrett A. Strang, R.A. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Michael A. LoGrande SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE RECEIVED BY omo,, TOW, q jf , DATE August 17, 1987 Honorable Louis T. Howard Suffolk County Legislator 197 Broadway Amityville, NY 11701 Dear Legislator Howard: Your letter to Dr. Harris and the materials enclosed regarding our staff's involvement with the application by Charles Bowman for a subdivision in Southold was sent to me by Deputy Commissioner Paul O'Brien in mid-July. Since then, I have investigated the matter and arranged a meeting with the applicant and the Town. On August 14, 1987, at 9:30 a.m. in Room S-214 of the County Center in Riverhead, we met with Mr. Mark Baxter and representatives from the Town of Southold to discuss Mr. Baxter's and Mr. Bowman's concerns. The following people attended: Vito Minei, P.E. Louise Harrison Stephen Costa, P.E. Royal Reynolds, P.E. Nell Giffen Valerie Scopaz - Chief, Office of Ecology - Supervisor, Bureau of Environmental Management - Supervisor, Bureau of Wastewater - Senior Public Health Engineer - ~nvironmental Analyst - Town Planner, Town of Southold David Emilita - Planning Consultant, Town of Southold Mark Baxter - Owner and Applicant We learned at the beginning of the meeting that Mr. Bowman could not attend because of a serious illness in his family. Mr. Baxter demonstrated some misunderstanding of the environmental review process and the roles of the involved agencies. Much of the meetihg was focused on explaining the review system to him. Ms. Scopaz suggested that the details of the environmental concerns be reserved for discussion at a scoping session for the DEIS. Mr. Baxter agreed, and the meeting came to a close. Letter to Louis T. Howard August 17, 1987 Page 2 and that the necessary course. We hope that some of the issues surrounding this project have been settled environmental review will proceed along a smoother Aldo Andreoli, P.E. Director, Division of Environmental Quality AA/ta cc: David Harris, M.D., M.P.H. BCC: Valerie Scopaz~/ BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 S.E.Q.R.A. SIGNIFICANT DECLARATION NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Date: December 26, 1985 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Trustees, as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action proposed is a Type I action and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. APPLICATION NO. 326 NA~: Land Use Company on behalf of Charles W. Bowman TYPE OF ACTION: TYPE I DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Appellant requests permission to create two three acre lots and construct a single family dwelling and sanitary system on each. Approximately 2,500 cu. yds. of fill will be placed on the sites to raise the grade for flood plain and S.C.D.H.S. requirements. To install two fixed docks leading to ramps and floats. LOCATION OF PROJECT: Main Bayview Road, Southold, County of Suffolk and more particularly identified an the Suffolk County Tax Map as 1000-078-07-3,4,5, and 1000-076-03-34.2.36. REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An Environmental Assessment form in the long form has been submitted and reviewed and determined that the project as proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. 2. The Conservation Advisory Council has reviewed the proposal and conducted an inspection of the subject property and recommended disapproval based on the comments from the S.C.D.H.S. regarding the septic system. 3. The project as proposed may effect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town. Page 2. Copies to the Following: Charles T. Hamilton, D.E.C. Stony Brook Commissioner Henry G. Williams Aram Terchunian, Coastal Management Program Stephen Mars, Corps of Engineers, N. Y. Dist. Conservation Advisory Council Town Clerk's Bulletin Board ~ Land Use Company on b~I~ oI Charles W. Bowman Planning Board, Town of Southold Building Dept. Board of Appeals Trustees File BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 January 8, 1986 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Glenn E. Just The Land Use Company North Country Road P. O. Box 361 Wading River, New York 11792 RE: Charles W. Bowman Wetland Application No. 326 Dear Mr. Just: Transmitted herewith is the Significant Environmental Determination adopted by resolution at a regular Trustee meeting held on December 26, 1985, regarding the above- referenced matter. Please be advised that the Board would like to coordinate with the Planning Board in scheduling a scoping meeting. Therefore, we will advise you accordingly upon notification from the Planning Board of this date. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate calling this office at the telephone number listed above. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pfifferling Clerk to Board HPS:ip Attachment cc: Conservation Ad¥isory Council Planning Board ~ Board of Appeals Building Dept. Trustees N. COUNTRY RD. · BOX 36~ WADING RIVER. N.Y..79~ (5~6) 9~9~3575 'J IN 27 January 22, 1986 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, N.Y. 11792 Attn: Mr. Henry P. Smith Wetlands Application No. 326, Charles W. Bowman Dear Mr. Smith: Please be advised that at this time we are withdrawing the above noted application. As we understand that the main con- cern of the Town CAC was denial by the S.C.D.H.S. Said denial is part of their standard procedures when properties have less than 10' to groundwater. Therefore~ rather than pre- pare a D.E.I.S. for a project that conforms to all existing. wetlands regulations we will attempt to satisfy the S.C.D.H.S. requirements prior to resubmitting the same to your agency as well as the Planning Board. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Very Truly Yours, Glenn E. Just (~^~ GEJ/te ~' /.~c~ Southold Southold Town Planning Board Town Conservation Advisory Council TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER FORMER OWNER RES. T LAND TREET VI LLAGE N $ SEAS. VL _~ I I IMP. TOTAL NEW AGE FA ME Hc Total NORMAL E FARM DATE .~.T. SUB. / TYPE OF BUILDING COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value REMARKS LOTS ~-~ ~'~__ Jr BUILDING CONDITION BELOW ABOVE >.M Acre Value Per Vdue , Acre ble ! i ] · FRONTAGE ON WATER dland ! I FRONTAGE ON ROAD I I dowl~nd j ! DEPTH I ' se Plot ! J BULKHEAD i J Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 23, 1985 Mr. John Trettner Land Use Company P.O. Box 361 Wading River, NY 11792 Re: Minor Subdivision Charles W. Bowman Dear Mr. Trettner: The following actions were taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, October 21, 1985. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board request that an applicationbe made to the Southold Town Trustees regarding the minor subdivision of Charles W. Bowman, located at Southold, since this proposal would require filling in the area of the wetlands. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare themselves lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act for the minor subdivision of Charles W. Bowman, located at Southold. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN sOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M.Schuttze, Secretary cc: Town Trustees BOARD OF TO~N TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 November 25, 1985 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Charles Hamilton Alternate Permit Administrator N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation Building 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. Hamilton: Pursuant to your Lead Agency Coordination Response dated Noven%ber 12, 1985 please be advised that the Trustees have not made their Environmental Determination on the wetland application of Charles Bowman regarding a subdivision and docks at Bayview Road, Southold. When the Trustees make their determination, you will receive a copy of same. Thank you for your interest and concern regarding this matter. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees ~e r l~ln~ Secretary to Board HPS:ip cc: Trustees Planning Board File New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Re. ~/~ LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION RESPONSE This letter responds to your communication of /D/7~o/~ ~' , regarding lead agency coordination for the above-noted project, under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. The Department has the following interest in this project: DEC Permits (if any): Io-~-~lLt8 ~l~,qzlo, ~_.~oco,'na,J $ol-~d~ ..... ~ DEC Contact person: SEQR Classification: [ ] Type I [M/~Unlisted DEC Position: Based on the information provided: [ [~/~EC has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status fo~__ this action. [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. [ ] DEC needs additional information in order to respond (see comments). [ ] DEC cannot be lead agency because it has no jurisdiction in this action. Comments: [~see attached [ ] none If you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above, please contact this office to resolve designation of lead agency within the time allowable under Part 617. Please feel free to contact this.office for further information or discussion. t~-~c¢-~ ~'~ ~ V~- c~,¢~r~--.,-~,~,~., Sincerely, cc: (attach distribution list) APR N. COUNTRY RD. · BOX 36~ WADING RIVER. N.Y..79~ (5~6) 9:9-3575 1987 March 31, 1987 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision Application Main Bayview Road - Southold Charles Bowman - Applicant Gentlemen: Enclosed please find one copy of a letter recently received from Suffolk County Dept. of Health (Vector Control) indicating that a ditch recently installed on our property without permission or knowledge can be filled at anytime. I remain, Very Truly Yours, Charles W. Bowman~ CWB/te Enc. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Michael LoGrande SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE APR OAVID HARRIS M.D,. M,P,H. March 27, 1987 Mr. C~aries bowman P.O. Box 361 Wading River, N.Y. 11792 Re: Property at Main Bayview Road, Southold Dear Mr. Bowman: With regard to referenced property, the Bureau of Vector Control has no objection to you filling the existing mosquito ditch to the line of the small southern wetland area. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, Samir S. Guirgis, Ph.D. Entomologi st SSG:ld HENRY P, SMITH, President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Mmrch 30, 1987 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Charles Bowman Land Use Company P. O. Box 361 N. Country Road Wading River, New York 11792 Re: Application No. 501 Dear Mr. Bowman: Please be advised that the Southold To*rn Trustees tabled your wetland application referenced above.during their regular meeting on March 26th. The Trustees would have declared a Significant Environmental Assessment on this application based on the following: 1. Previous inspection and determination that this should remain as one lot, with one house proposed on the North lot. 2. Salt marsh is accreting. 3. The site has bee~ hydraulicly filled. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact this office at the telephone number listed above. cc: Planning Board Trustees file Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PETE:R F. COHALAN We are in receipt of your letter dated referenced project. Date DAVID HAI~I~I$, M.D., M.P.H. 1/- 0~-7-,~/. /-~',5'"J"-'concerning the above This Department has no objection to your designation of lead agency status. This Department is in agreement with your initial This Department does not agree with your initial Con~nents. determination. determination. See 4. Insufficient information is available for technical comments. 5. There is no record of an application to this Department. A more accurate project location is needed. (Suffolk County Tax Map #) This Department has received an application and it is: Complete Incomplete ~Other: ~ 7, It appears that the project can be served by: Sewage Disposal System Sewer System and Treatment Works Subsurface Sewage Disposal System{s) Other: 548-3318 Water Supply System A Public Water Supply System Individual Water Supply System(s} Other: ~8. Con~nents: The Health Department's primary environmental concern pertaining to development is that the applicant comply wi th the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code especially Article ¥ and VI, and relevant construction standards for water supply and sanitary sewage disposal. These considerations are to be reviewed completely at the time of application. Full consideration in placement of water supply wells and disposal systems is given to state and town wetland requirements. The Health Department maintains jurisdiction over final location of disposal and well systems and the applicant should not undertake to construct any water supply or disposal system without Health Department approval. Other portions of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code also apply to conmmrcial development.such as Article XII. The Lead Agency is requested to forward a copy of this form to the applicant with its findings. Fu~he~ co~en~ ms~ be pto~d~d upon c~ple~on of ~h~ 8ppl~c~on review. Name / Phone ~-~ C OF S OUTHOLD C' ENVIROSTMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART PROJECT I N-F Op~V~%T I ON ... :: is exae_.r:.e~ :na~ camal'~an of ~'~e ~AF wiTl ~e deoen~e.,rc on fnfarrna:(an CUm't_nCly available and ~i11 no,' ~rlE ,3F PqOJECT: ....... No~% Charles W. Bowman by Glenn E. Just of the Land Use Company ''* PY'O. Box 361-N. Country Rd. Wading River, N,Y. 11792 Charles W. Bowman P.O. Box 361-N..Country Rd. Wadin~ River, N.Y. 11792 ~U~E~.~ ~G:~E: (516)-929-3575 and sanitry system on each. Approximately 2.500 c.v: of F(ll will inst~lled at thc si~es to raise the grade for flood plain qnd SeC.D.H.S. requirements. Appizcant also prODOSeS to Install leading to r mps. ~ j ~ p~a a} c Applicant proposes to Create (two) 3 acre lots and constru a sin~l~ ~mmily dw~llin~ 2~, ZS :r LC.L.) 1 ~cr~s 1 / 8 ~c=~s ~enerally uneven and rail ing or irr~.guIar ;)res~qcly After CcmolsCion " ° .... ~'."=CX, 3~ ' 3~ sand Approxir..a:e pe_rcentage of proposed projec~ site with slopes: greater ~. 0-I0:100 :; 10-15: Is project contiguous to, or contain a building or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? Tes × No What is the depth to the water table? .~.. 5~eet '- 09. hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? X Yes Oees project site contain an~ species of plant or animal 1fie that ts identified as threetene~ or endangered - .. Yes × ~o, according to - Identify each species Are ~ere any unique or U,usual land forms eh the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations - Yes X No. -(Describe Is the project site presently used by the cor~unity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation : area - Yes X ~o. . Ones the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to.the coca, unity? Yes ..×...No ' . "-: Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Memo of stream and name of river to which it is tributary Goos~ C:ee~ " L~5. Lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within ar contiguous to project a~a: a. Na~ Goose C:eek ; b. Size tin acres) 'Un~no~n 16. What is the dominant lanJ use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project single family residential, R-Z) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). Sing[e Ea~i17 Residentia~ PROJECT OESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) 7.02~ a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage developed: acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped d. Length of project, in miles: 0 (if appropKiate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: age ; developed acreage fluter of off-st~t parking spaces existing '-0 Maximua vehicular trips generated per hour If r~sidential: Number and type af housing units: One 'Family Two Family Initial 2 0 Ultimate 2 0 If: Orientation NeighborhoedoCit¥-Regiona) Co.~ne roi al 0 I proposed 0 .(upon completion of project) Multiple Family Condominium 0 0 0 0 Estimated Employment 0 butld~ng square foot. Industrial 0 J. Total height of tallest proposed structure feet. Pending Design -2- How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site - 0 tons 0 cubic yard: less than How many acres o? vegetation (trees, shrubs, g{'ound covers) will be removed from site - ... acres. Will any mature ?crest (over lO0 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes X No Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? X.____Yes No $. I? single phase project: 7. If multi-phased project: 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Yes ~.Number of Jobs generated: during construction 12 lC. Nu~er of Jobs eliminated by this project O. ll. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? months. (including demolition). month ),ear {includiu~ Anticipated period of construction a. Total n~nber of phases anticipated ,No. b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 demoii rich) c. Approximate completion date final phase month d. Is phase I financially dependent on subsequent phases? ; after project is complete 0 . Yes No Yes X No. If yes, explain: a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes X ,No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) ¢. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, ~onds, streams, bays or other surface wateraays be increased or decreased by proposal? Yes ~ No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the lO0 year r~ood plain? X Yes No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? X Yes NO b. If yes, will an ~xisttng solid waste disposal facility be used? ¥ Yes No c. If yes, give name: S outhol d Land Fil~ location Rte. 48 Scut hold d. Will any wastes not go intoa sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~ Yes ,X 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes X No 17. Will project r~utinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Yes X No lB. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes X No lg. Will project ~esult in an increase in ener~yuse? × Yes ,,No. If yes, indicate type(s) __ Electrical . 20. If water suppty is from wells indicate pumping capacity 10 gals/minute. gl. Total anticipated water usage per day 300 ga]s/day'house 22. Zoning: a. What is dominant·zoning classification of site? ~e$[dent[a[ b. Current specific zoning classification of site c. is proposed use consistent with present zoning? d. If no, indicate desired Zoning Rsidential Y~.~ -3- Approvals: a. b. ¢, Is any Federal permit required? × Yes NO 0Des pmJect involve State or Federal.funding or financing? Lo~al and Regional approvals: Approval Required (ies, liD) (Type) Yes ~' No Submittal Approval (Date) (Oate) City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning 5nard City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other local agencies Other regional agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies C. INFQP~ATIG)LAL DETAILS 'I 7-85 no ~ U.S.D.n.A. 7-85 Attach any additional information as ~ay be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverie impacts associated with the' pmposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken tn mitigate or avoid them. PREPAR£R'S SI~4ATUR£: TITL/: /Analyst Charles W, Bowman REPF~S~TING: DATE: 1 1 - 1 - 8 5 PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEZI~ MAGNITUDE General Infon~atien (Read Carefully) - In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations - Id~nt~F~in~ that an effect will be ~otentially large (column 2) does not mean that it t$ also necessarily eionificant. Any large effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. ~y.identifying an ef~ec= in column Z simply asks that it be leaked at further. ' .' - The Examnles provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the thresh of magn~Puae that would trigger a r~sponse in col~n ~. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any scecific project or site other examp]es and/or lower thresholds may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, on each site, in each ~ocality, will vary. ~erefore, the examples have been offered as guidon They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully} b. ¢. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any effect. ~ayb~answers should be considered as Yes answers. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the aoorooriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals ~r :~xc~_~soo~ any example provided, check column 2. impact will occur but threshold is lo,er than examoie, check column l. If ravia,er has doub~ about the size of the imgact ~?%.oonsider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. If a potentially large i~pact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less t~an large magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. IMPACT ON LAND YES Any construction on slopes of 15: or greater, ils foot eisa per 100 foot of length}, or where the general slopes in the project ar~.a exceed 10:. Construction on Land where the depth to the water table is lass than 3 feet. Construction of oaved parking area ~or l,~O~ or ~¢~ vehicles. C~nstructicn on land ~here bedrock is exposed or ~anerally witnin 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction ~hat will continue for more than I year or involve more :hen one phase or stage. Excavation For mining ~urposes that ~ou)d remove ~ore than l,O00 tons of na~ura) i~terial (i.e. rock or soil) per year. Construction of any new sanitary landfill. -S- Exa~oles that l.iould Apply to Column S~(ALL TO POTEfl:rtAL CAN IfiPACT BE MODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT C HA.q~.E PROJECT SITE? Construction in a designated flmod~ay. Other tmpa~ts: WILL THERc BE AN EFFECT TO ANY uNIqUE OR 'UNUSUAL .LAN. O FQPJ.IS FOUND' O~l'~H~ SITE? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, geologicat t~ns,' etc. ) Speci fit land fo~s: ~IPACT ON WATE~ NO YES WILL PROJECT APFECT ANY WATER 800Y 0ESi~IATEO AS .......... PROTECTED? {Under Articles 15, ~¢, 25 of the Enviro onm~ntal Conservation Law, Examples that Would Apply to Column Z 0redging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: WILL PROJECT AFFEu~l' ANY NO[I-FP~)TECTED ~ISTIDIG OR )qEW NO YES BODY OF I'JATER? ·- ' ................. .Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the suvaco area of any body ~of water or more than a IO acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds l0 acres of surface area. .. Other impacts: WILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUNDWATER QUALITY? Examples that Would Apply t~ Columm 2 " Project will require a discharge permit. Project requires use efa source of water that does not have approval tn serve proposed project. Project requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causin~ any contamination of a public water supply system. Project will adverselylaffect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate ca2acity. Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Project will likely cause siltation or other discha~a into an existing body of water :o the extent that :here will be an obvious visual cOntraSt to natural_~ditions. NO )DERATE LARGE REDUCe3 BY. , THPACT lr?ACT . PROJE,rT CHA~:GE ES =~ Other Impacts: ~. WILL PROJECT ALTER DRAINAGE ~051, PATTER,qS OR SURFJCE !:ATER ,'IQ YES RU:IOF.F? .......................................' " ' " ''''" Examo]e that .~:ould Apply to Colum~ 2 Project would impede flood water Flews. Project, is likely to cause substantial erosion. . Project is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. -- Other impacts: IMPACT ON A[,~, )~0 YES Examoles that Would Apply to Column ~' -- Project will induce 1,O00 or more. vehicle trips in any given hour. Project will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5 -- lbs. per hour or a heat source producing m~re than lO million 8TU's per hour. Other impacts: · ,~lO YES 8. WILL PROJECT AFFECT A~(Y TIiREATEi(ED OR F~IOA~IGERED SPECIEST ~ ~ Examples that :..'ould Apply to Column _~ Reduction of one or more species listed on the ..':e~ York found on the site. '' Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wild- life habi tar.. Application of Pesticide or barbie(de over more than Ot,qer impacts: g. ,~iLL pROJECT SU~STZj~?,rALLY AFFECT ~O:I-T?,REATE:iE-d. '~R ~0 YES EN~A;,'GERE~ S?EC~ES? ....................................... GO Example that ',lould Apply to Column 2 Project would ~ubstantially interfere wi Ch any resident or ~igratcry fish or wild]ifa species. mature forest (ever lO0 years ~n age) or ot~er locally 10.. ll. 12. I?PACT OM VISUAL RESOURC~ WILL THE PPOJECT APFECT VIEWS, VISTAS OR THE VISUAL CHARACTER OF THE ~;EIGHBORH~O OR COh~XUNITY~ .... ~ ......... Examsles that 11auld Apply tO ~l~n 2 An incompatible visual affect caused b~ the introduction of new materials, colors and/or fo~s in contrast ~o the sur~unding landscape. A project easily visible, not easily screened, that is ~bviously different f~m others a~un~ it. ~ject will result in the elimination or screening of scenic views ar vistas known ~o be impo~ant to the area. Other impacts: NO IN_PACT ON HISTORIC RESOURCE_S WILL PROJECT [NPACT ANY SITE/OR STRUC~RE OF HISTORIC, NO YES PRE-HISTORIC OR PAL~ONTOGICAL IP. PORTANCE? ................. ~ 0 Exam:les that Would Apply to Col~ 2 P~ject occurinq wholly or pa~iall7 within or contiguous to any facility or site listed ~n the National Register of. historic places. ~y impact to an archeolagical site or fossil bed located within the project site. Other impacts: ~IPAC'T ON OPEN SPACE & RECREATTOH .' WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT mE OUAMTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTING HO YE~ OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPOR~J?IITIES? ...... ~j~ ~ V Examples that Would Apply to C~lunm 2 The permanent fore:losure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: IMPaCT nN TP. ANSPORTATIOt! Examoles that Would Acply to Column 2 Alteration of present ~atteres of m~vement of people and/or goods. Project will resu)t in severe traffic problems. Other impacts: ~SD~LL TO POTENTIAL ~ODEP~ATE LARGE IMPACT IMPACT YES/ CA;J I,~IPACT .BE REDUCED BY PROJECT CF.A N)J E 14. 1S. t~P~CT ON ENERGY WILL PROJECT AFFECT ~E CO~UNITIES SOURCES OF ~£L OR NO Y£~ ~ERGY SUPPLY? ........................................... GO Examoles that ~ould Apply to Col~n 2 ProjeCt causing greater than 5% increase in any ~ of ener~ used in municipality. Project recuiring the creation or extension of an ener~ transmission or supoly system to se~e ~re than 50 single or ~o ~ily residences. Other impacts: ~MPACT ON NOISE WILL THERE B~ OBJECTIONA~L~ QOORS. NOISE, GLARE, V~ATION NO YES or ~ECTRIC~L DIS~dR~ANC~ AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJ[CT? .... ~/~-~ Examnles that Would Apoly to Column 2 Blasting withi~ 1,~O0 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely ~more than one hour per day) Project will produce operating noise exceedin9 the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of stroctures. Pmject will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: NO YES , Lr, ............ Examol~s that Would ~pply to Column 2 ... Project will cause a risk of explosion or release of ~azardcus substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, er there will be a chronic low level discharge or emission. ~ Project that will r~sult in the burial of "hazardous wastes" {i.e. toxic, ~oisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., iectu~ind wastes tha~ are solid, semi-solid, liquid or contain gases.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of l(quified natural gas or other liquids. Other imoacts: SMALL TO POTE:'iTIA1 CA~'; [:'.PACT'CE" ~DEP. ATE LARGE REOUGED BV-'~ IMPACT ' I.qPACT PROJECT CHANGE S ) $ WILL PROJECT AFFECT I'HE CHARACTER nF THE EXISTING rio YES Example that Would Apply to Column 2 The population of the City, Town or Village in '~hich the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5~ resident human population. The municipal budgets for capital exbenditures or opera- ting services will increase by more than $'~ per year as a result of this project. . 'Jill involve any ~ermanent facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove prime agricultural lands from cultivation. The project will replace er eliminate existing facilities, strictures or areas of historic importance to the cam~..unity. Oevelopment will induce an influx of a particular age group with special needs. Project will set an important precedent for future projects. Project will relocate 15 or more employees in one or more businesses. Other impacts: NO m YE: 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCER~gl;~G THE PROJECT? ....... ~ ~ Examples that Would Apply to Columo 2 Either government or citizens of adjacent corm~unities have expresaad opposition or rejected the project or have not been contacted. Objections to the project from within the corr~nunity. I, P~C, [;IP.ACT ~ROJ ECT' C~JhGF. I IF A:;Y ACTION IN PART 2 IS IOE,gTIFIED AS A POTE~4T!AL LARGE IMPACT OR IF YOU C.tN;JOT DETE~.II~tE ' THE MAGNIlgJDE OP I~IPACT, PROCEED TO PART g. PQRTIONS OF ~F CO,qPLETED FOR il~,IS PROJECT: OETEP~tI NATION ..... PART I PART Il PART Upon review of the information ~corded on this FAF (Parts 1, Z and 3) and considerin~ both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined that: A. The ~roject will resul~ in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significJnt damage to the environment. ~. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, chore will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures descrlbeo in PART g have been inc!uced as part of the ~rcposed ?eject. C. The project will result in one or more major adverse imeacts that cannot be reduced and may cause significant damage to the environment. Oate Signature of Preparer (if differen: from respons~:Je officer) PREPARE A NEGATIVE DECLAiLRTIOIt PREPARE A ,4£C::~TI'IE DECL2~P~ATIO~I PREPARE POSITIVE DECLARATION PROCEED WI- Signature of Responsible Official in L~ Agency Print or type name of responsible offic in Lead Agency TOWN OF $OUTHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT- PART III EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF iMPACTS Part 3 is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially large. The amount of writing necessary to answer Part 3 may be determined by answering the question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I blaced in this record sufficient inform, at(on to indicate the reasonableness of my decisions) .~. INST2UCTIOtZ$ Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in'Column 2 of Part I. Z. Briefly describe the impact. Describe (if applicable) haw the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than iarge impact by a pro- Ject change. Based on the inforoation available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is imoort~n~ . to the minicipality (city, town ar village) in which the project is located. To answer the question of importance, consider: - The probability of the impact or effect occurring - The duration af ~e impact or effect Its irreversibility, including peroenently los: resources or values - Whether the impact or effect can be controlled - The regional consequence of the impact or effect - Its potential divergence from local needs ~nd ~oals Whether known objections to the project apoly to this impact or el?eot. DETERMINATION OF SI~IIFICA:)CZ An action is considered to be significant if: One (or core) impact is deteroined to both large and its (their) consequence, based on the review above, is imoortant. PART III STAT~4EXT5 (Continue on Attachments, as needed) APPLICATION FOR DEPAR1 'HE ARMY PERMIT ' *'. o?o2.oo36 '" , ~ , , .. (33 CFR $~S) ~zpJr~ 30 June 1986 The ~rtment of the ~my ~rmit pro.am b iuthofl~d by Section 10 of the River and ~r Act of 1899. Section 404 of tho Clean Water A~ and Section 103 of the Mari~, ~o~ion, Re~ch and ~n~u~i~ Act. The~ laws r~u~e ~rml~ actlviti~ in o~ ~ffectlng navigable wa~rs of the Unit~ S~tes, the d~c~r~e of dredged or fill ~r~l into wa~ of the U~t~ and the trnns~tion of d~dged ~r~l for the pur~ of dumping it ln~ oc~n w~rL. Infor~tion ~ovided on t~ f~m wHl be /US~ In ev~l~t~g the appli~tlon for a ~rmit. Infor~tion in th~ appll~tion ~ ~de a ~t~ of public re~ through ~m of~ public notl~. Di~loaure of the lnfor~tion ~qu~ted ~ rotundly; ~wever, the da~ ~ques~d ~e nece~ In o~ ~ ~unim~ with the appli~nt and to eval~ the ~rmlt sppllmtlon. If ne~ Infomtlon ~ not ~d~, the ~r~t appa~t[~ ~ot pto~d ~r mn ~ ~rmit ~ ~uud. ' f th ~d ~ucible copl~'which=~ w th lo.ti d ~ One~toforigi~ldmwln~orgood~pr o · onan e m~o · actlv m~t~ at.chad ~ th~ appiimtion (see ~mpJe dm~in~ end i~actJo~) ~d be submittal ~ t~ D~[~ En~in~r ~vln~ J~i~u ov~ the I~tion of the propo~d activity. An ~ppli~tion t~t is not completed In full will ~ retina, ................... Glenn ,E, .Jdst/Asent/Land .Use,'Co~. , 2. NAM~ANOAOORBBSOFAPP~ICANT Charles W. Bowman N. Country Rd., Box 361 Wading River, N.Y. 1179 */c(516~q?q-3575 · ~olJ'~-~; ,. ,.., N. Country Rd., Box 361 Wading River, N.Y. 11792 A/C ( I" ' "' fii.idd,n~) ' '~"" · A/C C516 ) - 9 ~ 9 - ~ 57 5 tof~.~ I Applicant proposes to create (two) 3 acre lots and construct a single .family dwelling and sanitary sys%em on each. Approximately 2,500 c,y. of fill will be in~alle~ ~t' the sites to raise the grade for flood plain and S.C.D.H.S. ,requirements. Applicant. also pr,oposes to .install tW6 fixed docks leadign to ramps and floats per plan attached. 4b. PURPOSE Private Residences Fill will be installed at sites to raise grade for flood plain . .and Suffolk C~, ~t: o~,~H, ealth rBq~i~e~n~s. . , . , ,.' ENG FORM 4345, Apr 83 EDITION OF 1 OCT 77 IS OBSOLETE .... Herman & Frieda~,Ohlman., Main-Bayview ...... ~"~ ; .... ."S~o~thol~d',' N.Y. 1~1971,.. ,..~ '. ~ i., ..~,-~ ........ & "'' ' '%'~;" ~"'" ' '~' yX~*~ ~'.,' :: ~ ........ ' Eli thy Mai ..................... ..-,,~u~o.~u, ~ ¥~,.. ,~ ........ ~,, ....... .... .... ~odse C~eek Main~Bayview Road"S'd~th01d :";" ETREET, ROAD, ROUTE OR OTHER OESCRIPTIYE LOCATION Suffolk N.Y .... ~ ' ::'..!1971 COUNTY STATE ZiP CODE 'Town of Southold ",.'"'"~-',;,' .... ISEUINO AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL IDENTIFICATION NO. DATE OF APPLICATION DATE O1= APPeovAL GATE OF DENIAL N, ¥, S, D. E, C, pendin§ Town of Southold ,pendin§ SIGNATURE DP APPLICANT GATE SlGNATy~..~OF G~dT The application m~t be signed by the pecan mbo deal.s ~o undertake the pro~Md atilt,Sty (appH~nl) or euthor~ed ~ent if the statement in Block 3 h~ baen filled out a~d sianed. ' 18 ~.8.0. Section ] 001 provides that: Wh~ver, In any manner within the jutbdictio, of any de~rtment or knowingly and willfully falsifies, ~n~a~, or ~vers up by any ~ick, Echema, or devi~ a ~teriil faEE or ~ke8 any ~1~, fleilLlo~ or fraudulent/~men~ or repre~n~tionl or ~k~ or u~l any fal~ wriiini or documenl knowing Mme lo ~n~in ftauduleni s~LemenL or envy, s~ll ~ ~in~ not more t~n &]O,O00 or impri~a~ hal more i~n five yml, ~ not ~nd a ~rmit pro~uing ~ wiLh ~hls appll~Lion. ~he app~priale fee will be smmd when a ~rmlL b ~ued. "1 Southold, N,Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 15, 1987 Mr. Charles Bowman Land Use Company P.O. Box 361 Wading River, NY 11792 Re: Minor subdivision application Charles Bowman Dear Mr. Bowman: · Please let this confirm the following action and recommendation from the Planning Board at their regular meeting of April 13, 1987. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare themselves lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act for the minor subdivision of Charles W. Bowman located at Main Bayview Road, Southold. It was also recommended that the subdivision be revised so the development will not be in the wooded area. The Board noted during the field,inspection that many of the large trees on Lot No. 1 have been cut down and the Board is concerned with the preservation of woods. We havegiven you a rendering indicating'these com/nents. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, ~. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary Page 2 May 4, 1987 To: Southold Town Planning Board Re: Charles W. Bowman Minor Subdivision If it is found that the areas of proposed construction are within 75 feet of the nearest freshwater or saltwater wetland, or will require an application to this Board in any other manner, additional assessments may be necessary. Thank you for your referral of this matter. lk Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN T, LD S r~~T Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 15, 1987 Environmental Analysis Unit DEC, Building 40, Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 Gentlemen: Enclosed find a completed Short Environmental Assessment Form, a~copy of the application and the map of the minor subdivision of Charles W. Bowman, located at Southold, tax map no. 1000-76-3-34.2 and 36; 1000-78-7-3,4,5. This project may be a Type I and an initial determination of environmental significance has been made. We wish to coordinate this action to confirm our initial determination and inform you that a lead agency must be designated within thirty datys of the date of the EAF. It is determined that the environmental impacts are of primarily local significance, therefore, we are requesting lead agency status. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until April 29, 1987. We shall interpret lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Very truly yours, ~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD enc. cc: By Diane M. Department of Health Services Town Trustees Town Board of Appeals Town Building Department Schultze, Secretary APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 May 4, 1987 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application for Minor Subdivision Charles W. Bowman Property ID #1000-78-7-3, 4, 5; 1000-76-3-34.2 Dear Ben: This letter is in response to your correspondence coordinating your position under the SEQRA requirements. We do agree with your designation as lead agency, and wish to furnish the following comments: 1. The contours shown on the April 4, 1986 map prepared by Howard W. Young do not make reference to the existing elevations. (Maps of all existing contours should be furnished.) 2. The freshwater and saltwater wetland areas below the 5' contour line (landward of the tidal wetlands line) should be delineated and identified. If there are no other wetland areas other than "tidal", certification should be endorsed on the map. (Lot #2 is questionable.) 3. Areas of proposed construction should be flagged for on-site inspections. 4. Areas of proposed altered contours and fill placement should be flagged for on-site inspections. 5. Cattails and other grasses defined by Ch. 97 of the Zoning Code do appear to exist in areas close to the road and towards the proposed construction areas, and should be evaluated before any filling of the property commences. HENRY P. SMITH, President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, knew York 11971 April 29, 1987 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall - 53095 Main Rd. Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: In response to your letter of April 15, 1987 regarding the application of Charles Bowman for a minor subdivision on property located on Main Bayview Road, Southold please be advised that the Board of Trustees reconnnends the following: 1. There is only one buildable lot on this property and that is the most Northerly lot. The Southern lot has been hydraulically filled. The subject site has several species of Wetland vegetation flourishing on this property (saltwart, sea lavander, groundsel and cordgrass). Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact this office. Very ~t r~y yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip cc: Robert A. Greene, D.E.C., Stony Brook Commissioner Henry G. Williams, D.E.C., Albany Stephen Mars, Army Corps of Engineers Thomas Hart, Coastal Management Conservation Advisory Council Bldg. Dept. Board of Appeals File COU~TY OF SUFFOLK Michael A. LoGrande SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P,H. COMMISSIONER May 14, 1987 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, NY ~1971 RE: Subdivision Application of Charles Bowman SCTM: 1000-78-7-5.2 Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received your letter of April 14, ~987, regarding the above-referenced application and has no objection to your designation as lead agency. We have reviewed the information provided with your following comments regarding Sanitary Code compliance concerns. letter and submit the and natural resources I. Sanitary Code An application for realty subdivision was filed with our agency on September 24, ~985, and has been revised several times. Health Department staff is evaluating the survey revision of March 20, ~987, and awaiting "final submission" information from the applicant. Our agency will not make a final decision on this application until all requirements of the Sanitary Code have been fulfilled. The Health Department maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sanitary systems. Therefore, the applicant should not undertake the construc- tion of any such system without SCDHS approval. The applicantls test hole data indicates that groundwater levels are elevated on the site. This condition is not conducive to the proper functioning of individual subsurface disposal systems constructed pursuant to the general design specifications of SCDHS. II. Natural Resources Suffolk County Office of Ecology staff visited the subject site on May 5, Letter to Bennett Orlowski May 14, 1987 Page 2 1987. We submit the following comments and recommendations. The site contains three distinct areas of productive intertidal marsh dominated by salt marsh cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) and salt hay (Spartina patens). These areas appear to correspond to the designated "wetlands" shown on the applicant's survey. The designated wetlands do not, however, accurately depict the full extent of the site's wetlands, only those areas dominated by Spartina grasses. We have no evidence that the wetland boundary shown on any survey has been approved by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). Other portions of the property (primarily sea-ward of the 5-foot contour elevations) contain saturated, highly organic, bog soils dominated by Common Reed, (Phragmites communis). The areas dominated by Spartina grasses provide valuable wildlife habitat, and contribute organic nutrients to the marine environ- ment. The wetlands area dominated by common Reed provide a buffer to the wetland and wildlife from the impacts of human activity and provide limited nutrient production to Goose Creek. Protection of these areas is a primary concern on the subject parcel. The site's tidal wetlands are regulated by NYSDEC. The delineation of all wetland boundaries should be approved by the NYSDEC's Division of Marine Resources and indicated as such on the property survey. We feel that no approval actions should be taken on this application until the tidal wetland boundary has been approved by NYSDEC. On January 5, 1987, the project sponsor received a State tidal wetlands permit for a 2-lot subdivision plan dated June 10, 1985. The applicant has subsequently revised the subdivision design four times, and changed the proposed locations of fill deposition, sanitary systems, wells, and one of the dwelling units. The most recent subdivision plan (March 20, 1987) no longer depicts the information upon which NYSDEC granted its permit approval. As we understand it, the revised plans render the NYSDEC permit invalid. Our agency will not take any action on subdivision approval until NYSDEC reevaluates the current subdivision plan and informs us of their determination. We support the full protection of on-site wetlands and encourage the imposition of maximum wetland setbacks on any proposed clearing, construc- tion, or filling. The proposed amount of fill with creation of slopes greater than 10% increases the likelihood of fill erosion during site development. To best protect the tidal wetlands from sedimentation impacts, the applicant should consider creation of slopes of less than 10%. We request review of a detailed erosion control plan for the project. Because the reduction in slope may require additional encroachment into regulated areas, the applicant should consider a smaller structural design for proposed dwell- ings. A row of staked hay bales should be maintained around the base of each fill mound throughout site development. The erosion barrier should not be removed until all construction and final landscaping is complete. Letter t~ Bennett Orlowski May ~4, 1987 Page 3 High-maintenance landscaping and managed turf should be minimized to reduce potential impacts from lawn chemical runoff to tidal wetlands. We recommend the use of soil stabilizing plants wherever possible on this site. Do Eo Post-development protection of tidal wetlands can be benefited by the placement of deed covenants and restrictions on each of the lots. We recommend that a natural vegetative buffer be maintained from the base of all proposed fill to Goose Creek, with provisions only for limited boating and pedestrian access to Goose Creek. The two-foot drainage ditch indicated on the survey extends landward in a westerly direction to a point approximately 25-50 feet from Main Bayview Road. The ditch should be represented accurately on the subdivision plan. The channel acts as a drain for a substantial portion of Lot #2 and will be partially eliminated by the fill mound proposed on this lot. Any impacts of this action should be fully addressed by the applicant. III. Recommendations The subject property is composed largely of saturated soils and contains substantial tidal wetlands that are valuable to the productivity of Goose Creek. At this time, we are concerned principally about the protection of on-site tidal wetlands from erosio% sedimentation, and pollution impacts associated with site development. The project sponsor should obtain a revised or new Article 25 permit from NYSDEC, based on the most current proposal. As you evaluate this project, please address your attention to the following: DEC-approved delineation of tidal wetland boundaries 2. DEC-approval for revised plan 3. Maximum protection of tidal wetlands 4. Erosion control measures during construction 5. Low-maintenance and soil-stabilizing landscaping 6. Potential impacts of filling drainage channel Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at your convenience. Sincerely, Louise W. Harrison Supervisor, Bureau of Environmental Management Office of Ecology LWH/ta cc: Vito Minei Steve Costa Robert Greene, NYSDEC Charles Hamilton, NYSDEC New Yof'k State Department of Environmental Conservation Regulatory Affairs Unit Bldg. 40, SUA~, Rm. 219 Stony Brook, N. ¥. 11794 (516) 751-7900 JAN 1981t Hen~ G. Williams Commissioner Mr. Charles W. Bowman The Land Use Company Box 36~ N. Country Road Wading River, New York 11792 Re: Per=it No. 10-85-1218 Dear Mr. Bowman: In conformance with the requfremen:s of the State Uniform Procedures Ac: (Article 70, ECL) and its ~mplementing Regulations (6N~CP~, Part 621) we are enclosing your permit. Please read all conditions carefully. you are unable to comply w~th any'cOnditions, please contact us at theIf above address. A/so enclosed is a permit siva which is to be conspicuously posted at the project site and protected from the weather. e~closure Vet7 truly yours, .~J ~ph Hc ~urge~~' Deputy Regional Permit Ad=~nistrator 10-85-1218 NEW YORK STATE DEPAeENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PERMIT Under the Environmental Conservation Law EFFECTIVE DATE 1/5/87 EXPIRATION DATE{si 12/20/91 ~--~ Article 15, Title 3; 6NYCRR 327, 328, 329: Aquatic Pesticides ~'-~ Article 15, Title 5: Protection of Water ~'-~ Article 15, Title 15: Water Supply ~--~ Article 15, Title 15: Water Transport [----1 Article 15, Title 15: Long Island Wells [-----'1 Article 15, Title 27: Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers 6NYCRR 608: Water Quality Certification -- Article 17, Titles 7, 8: __ SPDES Article 19: Air Pollution Control* Article 23, Title 27: Mined Land Reclamation -- Article 24: __ Freshwater Wetlands N--New, R--Renewal, M--Modification, C--Construct (*only), O--Operate ('only) Article 25: Tidal Wetlands -- Article 27, Title 7; 6NYCRR 360: __ Solid Waste Management* Article 27, Title 9; 6NYCRR 373: Hazardous Waste Management -- Article 34: __ Coastal Erosion Management Article 36: Floodplain Management -- Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 27, 37; __ 6NYCRR 380: Radiation Control PERM~ ~SSUED To Mr. Charles W. Bowman - The Land Use Company ADDRESS OF PERM~TTEE Box 361 N. Country Road - Wading River, N.Y. 11792 AGENT FOR PERMITTEE/CONTACT PERSON TELEPHONE NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT/FACILITY (If different from Permitt~) Southold ESO main Bayview Rd. SCTM #100 -076-093, lots 34.2 36 #1000-076-07, 1 ts 3,4, and 5 D[SCRIPIlONOEAUTHORIZEDACTIVITY Subdivide a 7.024 acre lot into two lots of 3.75 acres and 3.274 and ~onstrt]et a one family dwellinq on each lot in the adjacent area of a Tidal Wetland. In~ta]] walk ways and floating docks. GENERAL CONDITIONS By acceptance o! this permit, the permittee agrees thai the permit is contingent upon strict compli- ance with the ECL, all applicable ~egulations and the conditions spoclfied herein or attached hereto. The permittee shall file in the office of the appropriate regional permit administrator, or other office designated in the special conditions, a notice of intention to commence work at ~east 4~ hours in advance of the time of commencement and shall also notify him/her promptly in writing of the completion of the work· The permitted work shall be subiect to inspection by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation which may order the work suspended it the public interest so reqmres pursuant to ECL §71-0301 and SAPA §401(3)~ The permittee has accepted expressly, by the execution of the application, the full legal responsibility for all damages, direct or indirect, of whatever nature, and by whomever suffered, arising out of the proiect described herein and has agreed to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits, actions, dama&es and cost~ of every name and de'scrip- The Department reserves the right to modify, suspend or revoke this permit at any time after due notice, and. if requested, hold a hearing when: bJ the permit was obtained by misrepresentation or failure to disclose relevent facts; or t) newly discovered information or significant physical changes are discovered since the permit was issued, The permittee is responsibte for keeping the permit active by submitting a renewal application, including any fo~ms, fees o~ supplemental information which may he required PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE PERMIT ADMINISTRATOR 1/5/87 J. Joseph Homburger cc:C.T.Hamilton' ' Sup¥. ,Tn.of Southold ADDRESS Bldg. #40 - SUNY Stony Brookr N,Y. 11794 Page I of 4 SUPPLEMENTARY SPECIAL CONDITIONS The followin~ conditions apply to all pe~mits: A. If any of the permit conditions are unclear, the permittee shall contact the Division of Regulatory Affairs at the address and telephone noted below. B. A copy of this permit or approval and supplementary conditions shall be ,reliable at the project site whenever authorized work is in progress. The perm/t siRn enclosed with the permit or a copy of letter of approval shall be protected from the weather and posted in a conspicinus location at the work si/e until completion of authorized work. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the perm/tree shall complete and return the top portion of the enclosed receipt form certifying that he is fully aware of and understands all provisions and conditions of this permit. Within one week of completion of the permitted work, the bottom portion of that for~ shall also be completed and returned. For projects involving activities to be accomplished over a period or more than one year, the perm/tree sh~ll notify the Regional Permit ldm/nistrator in writing at least 48 hours to the co-~encement of resumption of work each year. If project design modifications take place after permit issuance, the permittee shall submit the appropriate plan changes for approval by the Regional Permit Adm/nistrator prior to undertaking any such modifications. The permittee is advised that substantial modification may require sub- m/ssion of a new application for permit. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude cont-mtnation of any wetlands or wate~ay by suspended solids, sediment, fuels, solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or any other enviror~nantally deleterious materi~ls associated with the project work. Any failure to comply precisely ~rlth all of the terms and conditions of this permit, u~/ess authorized in writing, shall be treated as a violation of the Enviromnental Conservation Law. The permittee is advised to obtain any perm/ts or approvals that ~ay be required from the U.S. Department of Army Corps of Engineers, NY District, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278, (Attention: Re&mlatory Functions Branch), prior to co~encement of work authorized herein. The granting of this permit does not re/ieve the permittee of the responsibility of obtaining a grant, easement, or other necessary approval from the Division of Land Utilization, Office of General Services, Tower Building, Empire State Plaza, Albany, ~ 12242, which may be required for any encroachment upon .State-owned lands under water. 10-85--1218 DEC ~ Page 3 of Regional Perm/t Administrator LTS Dept. of Environmenta~ Conservation Bldg. 40, SUNY--Room 219 Stony Brook, NY 11794 (516) 751-7900 · The following conditions shall apply if checked as applicable by the Regional Permit Administrator: K. All dredging shall be conducted so as to leave a unifor~m bottom elevation free of mounds or holes. All spoil material shall be disposed of either in the Atlantic Ocean or at an approved U.S. Government Dumping Ground, as directed by the District Engineer, U.S. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers. Any spoil materlai not intended for such water disposal shall be removed from the site and disposed of at an approved upland site. Ail fill and spoil material shall be suitably contained at the work site so as to prevent its eroding, leaching or otherwise entering into adjacent wetlands and waterways. Ali peripheral rip-rap berms, cofferdams, rock revetments, gabions, bulkheads, etc. shall be completed prior to placement of any fill material behind such structures. All repairs to existing structures shall be confined to replacement of existing structu~ral ~l-m-p=s wi~b no change in design, dimension, or materials, unless specifically authorized herein. DATE 1/5/87 DEC # 10-85-1218 Page 4 of 4 Regional Permit Administrator Division of Regulatory Affairs NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook, NY 11794 (516) 751-7900 ~P~LES T. HAMILTON Chief, Marine Regulatory Section NYSDEC, ~ureau of Marine Habitat Protection Bldg. 40, SUNY, Room 225 Stony Brook, N. Y. 11794 Permit No. Issued To: Contractor's Name Contractor's Address Contractor's Phone No. Dear Sir: Pursuan: to General Condition Number 1 of the above referenced permit you are hereby notified that the authorized activity shall commence on This notice is to be sent at least two days in advance of commencement of the project. The permit sign will be posted at the site and copy of permit will be available at site for inspection. - ........ Submitted by Failure to notify or post sign will leave owner and/or contractor subject to applicable penalties for non-compliance with permit conditions. CHARLES T. HAMILTON Chief, Marine Regulatory Section NYSDBC, Bureau of Marine }{abitat Protection Bldg. 40, SUNY, Room 225 Stony Brook, N. Y. 11794 tLE: Permit No. ._ .~ Issued to -' ....... Con:factor's Name ::- '-' :-<: - Contractor's Address ': ..- · ..... - ........ J: Cbntract6r's . Dear Sir:' " -- : Pursuant to General Conditio~n Number 1 of the above referenced permit you are .hereby notified that the authorized activity was completed on Submitted by This notice, with photos of complel:ed work and or completed surwey, is to be sent to above address promptly upon completion of project. Failure to notif3 will leave ~;:_, -., owner 'and/o~'contractor subject to applicable', penalties for 'non-compliance- ' with · - permit conditions. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation NOTICE The Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has issued permit(s) pursuant to the Environmental Conservation Law for work being conducted on this site. For further informa- tion regarding the nature and extent of work approved and any Departmental conditions on it, contact the Regional Permit Administrator listed below. Please refer to the permit number shown when contacting the DEC. PermitNo. _~" ~ Expiration Date ~ ' ~Z, 0 -- ~' / 95-20-1 [1 Regional Permit Administrator NOTE: This notice is not a permit T LD Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 January 29, 1987 Mr. Charles Bowman c/o Land Use Company P.O. Box 361 Wading River, NY 11792 Re: Proposal for Charles W. Bowman located at Southold Dear Mr. Bowman: Pursuant to my conversation with Glen Just, of your office, enclosed is your application and check for the minor subdivision of your property at Southold. We currently have an application pending for this property and therefore, we can proceed with that without the necessity for a new application. We have retained for our files, the updated surveys and the DEC permit. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, enc. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN UTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, secretary Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Re: ~Lno~ 3u~dL~L~Lon - ~aLn Ba~L~ ~oad The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) (2) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yo~s truly, APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Soutlmld: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final)approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and RegulaHons of the Southold To~vn Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state_his interest in said land under application.) ~,~cta.~e~ ~/. l~owrnart 2. The name of the subdivision is to be .. ~.otaraRtl..o~.,.~. ................................. 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) See a'~'l:ctc~ed a~eei 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk Count)' Clerk's office as follows: CeaILfLeale o1~ 7'Ltde: #~. /2/~,277 Liber ........................ Page ................... On · Liber ................. Page ...................... On .......... Liber Page On ~ . Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... Liber ...................... Page On · as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ....................................... or as dlstributee ...... . .................................................................. 5. The area of the land is ....... ~., 0. ...... acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except ./J/glrtfl. ..... 7. The land is encumbered by ....... , .......................................... mortgage (s) as follows: ............ (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .t'0.5~.0. ..... Page ......... ~1 ..... in original amount of $....~.~,.0.0.0.: .00npaid amount $ ..................... held by .. ~i. Zl£am..P....R.Lde~t aqane Nelaon ~L.~.~.~. .......... address.. 826 Ba~t Bouleva,td Sout/b t~nna I~arLa, £1o,~Ld,z (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page ....................... in original amonnt of .............. nnpaid amount $ ...................... held by ................. ' . .............. address ............................................................... (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ........ .............. held by .......... ...................... address ................................ . ......................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against th~ land except ........................ 9. The land lles in the folloxving zoning use districts ........ ~.g4~¢~.t~¢~ ................ 10. No part of the land lies under water xvhether tide water, stream, pond water or other~vise, ex- cept ................................................................................... 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if ~vitbin a District, is Doe.i .rto~. 13. Water mains will be lald by ........................................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ...~o~....[a.,~ct~d..~ L~.fi.l:[.zl~...Co.,llpatl3l lines. ' ................. and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said 15. Gas mains xvill be installed by ............................................................ and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets sho~vn on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County IIighway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are'clalmed by the al)plicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold I lighway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located ami showu on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at tile end of the streets on said existing maps at their coiljnnctions with the l)roposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the al~l)licant will oiier proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of tile Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots -4~owing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D", 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $ .......... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the ' Performance Bond be fixed at .............. years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company nnless otherwise shown 'on Schedule "F". DATE .... .aq..a .rt.u..a.a. ~..~.'. i .... 19 82 £fiaaLca J,~. .... I l ll X~ ~ ....... (Signature and Title) ~ ' 'P.O. Bo,~ 36/-,q. Co. unttty ~d..:?.adLn~ (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF .~ug~og~ On the day of ........ ...... a'.°'.n..a.a..tt$ .............. 19...o/.., before me personally came ...~, .~. s..,~,,g _~..~'~X..k:~......~b.~.h~..-~?. :; .-~.....--~ to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ............ executed the same. No~ _BELINDA MARTIN ~ ry PubJic, State of New Yoff~ No. 4811863 ~eh30,191 Notary Publi~ .................................. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ............................ ss: On the ................ day ............ of .............. , 19 ...... , before me personally came ....................... to me koown, who being by me duly sworn did deo pose and say that ............ resides at No ..................................................... ................................ that .......................... is the .......... the corporation described in and which execnted the £oregoing instrument; that ............ knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. and lhat ............ signed .............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public · · NDMSER NEW YORK STATE. DIVISIONDEPARTMENToF REGULAToRyOF ENVIRONMENTALAFFAiRS CONSERVATIO~ PROJECT LO. State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I Project Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) ~,,~Ze~ ~/. Bowman I Bowm~n ~. ~. Project location: Municipality [] New I'-1 Expansion [] Modification/alteration p2aLn ~nd b.L.D.#.S, ae~ugneanen~4. ~p2itcan~ ai~o pno£o~¢4 Amount of tan affected: [] Yes [] Jqo If No, describe briefly [] Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial [] Agriculture [] Parkland/open space [] Other -.'. [°Lrl Yes I'--] NO Ifyes. Jistagency(s) andpermit/approvals '-~O/g'~O'~&/ /OWn ~g~nn~n~ ~o~ - p~d~ ~ Yes ~ NO II yes, list agency name and permi~approvaJ ty~ I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OJ~ MY RNOWLEDCE ///?/87 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 3. 5. 7. 8, 'giTM 1 ~hsre be a ~Jor ckang~ =o ~ny ,~lque cr ~--- ~roJec~ af:'ec~ any :b~eacaned ~r en~angersd ~An: or an~!.spec!es? , . W~ projec~ r~s~: in a ~Jcr adverse W~! pr~Jec~ ~ve a ~Jor effec: on visu~ W~i proJec: adversely ~c~ urn cf bls=ct!c, pre,Astor!=, or palecutoicgzc~ ~o~ance or any si~a desi~a=ed as a crl~ic~ enviror, men~l arsa by · .oca= agency? , , , W~I prcJec: resul= ~u ~Jcr :ich cc' ..-.ore cn~u- 5-per:eh: c,,--".. -~ :~'~'~4r pu .... con:r=ve~sy Yes, Yes .. --~- 'fee _~Sfc Yea t~m't ~ ' ,, '.'es /No REGISTRATION W THE LAND TITLE ~o. ~2~,277 TRANSFERRED FROM ..... ~O6 . FIRST ~EGISTE~ED M~ch 25. 1946 1, JULIE'I"rE A. KINSELLA, Re$istra~, of the County of Suffolk, in the State of New York, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that MARK BAXTER, 6TL~RLES W. BOWMAN & FR~/~ LUTO as to the re~atnin~ undivided interest as tenants in co-~on of Wellington Place, ~nityville, NY, North Country Road, Wading River, NY and North Country Road, Wading River, NY thcownerS of an Estnte in fec simple in thc followins Land: AT.,?., that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, ly~ and hetn~ in the TOWN OF SUUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, STATE OF NEW YORK, be~ known and designated as lots n~nbered 68, 69, 70, 71 and the southeasterly one half of lot 72 on a certain map entitled '%lap of Goose Neck situate at Bayv~ew" and filed in the suffolk County Clerk's Office on Novenber 22, 1948 as and by Hap No. 1663, and described parcels adjacent thereto when taken to- gether bein~ more particularly described as follows: BEG1/~IIN~. at a monument on the northeasterly side of Hain Bayview Roe4, 325.0 feet southeasterly from the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly side of Smith Drive South and the northeasterly, side of Hain Bayview Road, and RUNNING THENCE North 39 deErees 00 minutes East alon.~ lands now or formerly of OI~L&N 162.32 feet to a mon%nnent: TIL~.NCE still along lands now or formerly of OHL?~%N North 60 degrees 39 minutes 50 seconds West 76.96 feet: 1'~u{NCE North 70 de,,tees 49 minutes A0 seconds East along lands now or formerly of B. STAHL 143.86 f-et and }lorth 39 de, tees 00 minutes East, still alor~ said lands of D. STAHL and later along lands now or formerly of RUSKOWSKI 338.37 feet to an iron pipe, lands now or formerly of O'Neill: THENCE South 51 deKrees 00 minutes East alon~ said lands of O'Neill, 210.0 feet; THENCE North 70 de, tees 49 minutes 40 seconds East, 30 feet more or less to the normal hig. h%7ater mark of G~se Creek: THENCE southeasterly and southwesterly alon~ ~he normal h~j~hwater mark of Goose Creek as it winds and turns approximately ~60 feet (more'- or less) to ]ands now or formerly of C, rattan: THENCE South 42 de~rees 53 minutes West alon~ lands now or formerly of Grattan 360 feet (more or less) to lands now or formerly of Grattan: T}~ICE along s~d lands now or formerly of Green. (1) North 51 de,,tees 00 minutes West 56.0 feet and (2) Sou=h 6,0 degrees 6,6, m~nutes 50 second's West 166.16, fee= to the n°rtheasterly s~de of l~a[n Ba~vSew ~ad: ~ North m~utes ~est al~ ~he north~st~ly s~de of ~a~ Ba~ew Road 420.6~ fee~ ~o the mo~t, the ~2 or' place of BE~I~. ~ to ~he estates, easy.ts, ~c~ances and char~es her~nder ~SS my hand and offf[c~l s~l a~ head, N.Y.,'~his 19th day of N~b~, 195~. DIST 1000, 1000 SEC 07600, 07800 B*LK 0300, 0700 T.OT 036,002, 036000c, f ~)~l~),OEa~(~J~dn~h~es and Charges on the Land described in this Cerli~ricate of Title No. 1 ')A DOCUMENT DATE OF ** NUMBER KIND REGISTRATION RUNNING IN FAVOR OF TERMS OR REMARKS SIGNATURE OF REGISTRAR SUBJECT to the building and zonimg regulations of the Town of Southold. iLL RIGHT, title and interest in and to land lying in the bed of any street, road or avenue is herein excluded from registration. TITLE to any land lying und ~r w~ter below the mean water mark of Goose Creek smd/or West Creek is excluded from registration. SUBJECT to covenants and restrictions as contained in deed Dom. #73807. TOG~ with the r~ght to ,,se for all reasonable purposes in c~on with others, portions of lots 37, 3S, and 39, Map of Goose Neck, as such rights are granted under deed Doc. ~73807. ................... Riles & Jane $43,000.00 w/int. @ 12%. Affect],~ 307955 Mortgage Nov 19-84 Wi11~m, P. Nelson Riley all within pre~ises. -~------- ................. IMPORTANT THIS OWNER'S DUPLICATE CERTIFICATE OF TITLE IS YOUR PROOF OF OWNERSHIP. TN~S DOCUMENT TAKES THE PLACE OF THE DEED. THIS INSTRUMENT MUST BE PRODUCED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY TRANS- ACTION INVOLVING THE REAL PROPERTY HEREIN. IF LOST. MISPLACED OR DESTROYED. DUPLICATION WILL REQUIRE A SUPREME COURT ORDER UNDER · SECTION 414 R.P.L. Extr~t From the RNI JSropefly Law, Cond~tu~nf Chapter ~0 of the Consolidated Laws SECTION 400. RICHTS OF' RECISTERED OWNERS; EXCEPTIONS; INC[JI~IBRANCES, ET CETERA, TO BE FILED--A person who receives a certi[icate of title pumuant to a Judgment o[ registration, except In case of fr;tttd to which he is a party, and a purchaser of registered real property, who takes a certificate of title for Yahte and iff gm-~l faith, shall hold the same free from all incumbrances, charges, trusts, liens and transfers, except those noted on the certificate in the registrar's office, and any of the following which may exist: FIRST. Liens. claims or rights arising or existing under the laws or constitution of the United States, which the statutes of this State do not require to appear of record; SECOND. Any tax, water rate or assessment, which becomes a lien on the property after Initial registration, and for which a sale has not been made; THIRD. Any lease or agreement for a lease, mede after or pending registration, for a period not exceeding one )'ear. where there Is actual occupation of the land under the lease or agreement; FOURTH. Easements or servitudes which accrue against the property after Initial registration In such manner as not to require their registration. Except as specified In the foregoing statement of excel~ions, no incumbrance, charge, tnsst, lien or transfer shall take effect upon or over real property the title to which has been registered, unless the instrument creating and setting forth such incumbrance, charge, trust, en or transt'er has been filed with the registrar, and a memorial or nota- tion thereof made upon the certificate o/title covering the property. , Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 May 18, 1987 Mr. Mark Baxter 30 Wellington Place Amityville, NY 11701 Re: Charles Bowman Minor subdivision Dear Mr. Baxter: As per your request, enclosed is a copy of the corresondence recently received from the Suffolk County.Department of Health Services with regard to the above mentioned subdivision. Very truly yours, lane M. Schultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board cc: Charles Bowman BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 February 28, 1986 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Glenn E. Just The Land Use Company N. Country Road Box 361 Wading River, New York 11792 RE: Charles W. Bowman Wetland Application No. 326 Dear Mr. Just: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees at a regular meeting held on February 27, 1986 regarding the above referenced matter. Moved by Trustee Smith seconded by Trustee Goubeaud it was RESOLVED that Wetland Application No. 326 for Charles W. Bowman be and hereby is WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Thank you for your cooperation in regard to this matter. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pfif ferling Clerk to Board HPS:ip cc: New York State D.E.C. ~ / Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Building Dept. Conservation Advisory Council Trustees File Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 January 15, 1986 Mr. John Trettner Land Use Company P.O. Box 361 Wading River, NY 11792 Re: Minor subdivision Charles Bowman Dear Mr. Trettner: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, January 13, 1986. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board rescind the resolution of October 21, 1985 declaring themselves lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act for the minor subdivision of Charles Bowman at Southold. The Town Trustees have received an application on behalf of Charles Bowman for filling and installing docks on the premises, therefore, they will be the lead agency for the Town. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, cc: Town Trustees BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M.Schultze, Secretary Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 21, 1985 Environmental Analysis Unit DEC, Building 40, Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 Gentlemen: Enclosed find a completed Short Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the map of the subdivision of Charles Bowman, located at Southold, tax map no. 1000-76-3-34.2,36; 1000-78- 7-3,4,5. This project is unlisted and an initial determination of nonsignificanCe has been made. We wish to coordinate this action to confirm our initial determination. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until November 4, 1985. We shall interpret lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and our agency will assume the status of lead agency. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., C}{AIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. cc: Department of Health Services State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only SEP 9 NUMBER PART I Project Information 0'o be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) John Trettner of the Land Use Co.. Baxter, Bowman & Lupo Municipality Southold CounW Suffolk f~ New [] Expansion [] Modilicatio~/&lterition Applicant proposes to create 2(two) 3 acre lots and construct a single family dwelling and sanitary system, on each. Approximately 2,500 c.y. of fill will be installed at the sites to raise the grade for flood plain and S.C.D.H.S. requirements. Main-Bayview Road (see map) ~ Residential [] Indu,trial ~ Commercial [] A~iculture [] Parkland/open $1~¢, [~ Other 10. Does action involve a permit~approvai, or fundin& now or ultimately, from any other 8overnmental a~mcy (Federal, state o~ Iocal]~ (~ Yes [] No If yes, list asency(s) and permit/approvals Town of Southold-pending U,R.D.O.A. -pendinm [] Yes [~No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: John Trettner of the 'Land use Co. as agent for Char. les Date: July 8,1985 I If the action 18 in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the I Coastal Assessment Fonn before proceeding with this assessment OVER PART II Environmental (To be completed by Agency) A. Does action exceed any Type I threshold in 6 NYCRR. Part 617.12~ If yes, coot'dinate the review process and use the FULL/LONG FORM EAF. [] Yes [] No ' B. Will action receive coordinated review as provided for Unlbted Actions in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.7f involwd action. [] Yes [] No C. Could action result in ANY adverse etfects on, to, o~ arising from the followin~ [Answers may be handwr tten, fegible) C2. Historic. archeological, visual or aesthetic, or other natural or cultural resources; agricultural dis~zicts; o~ community or neiahbothood cbe~acter~ Explain la.fly: C4. A community's existing plans or 8eels as officially adopted, or a change in use o~ intensity of use of land or other natural resources~ Explain briefly. CS. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed actionf Explain briefly. C6. SecondaP/. cumulative, or other effects not identilied in C1-C6~ Explain briefly. C7. A change in use of either quantity or type ct energy~ Explain briefly. PART III Determination of Significance (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (al setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL/LONG FORM EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide here, and on attachments as necessary, the reasons supportng this determination: Alency Preparers Name Agency Name __ Preparer's Signature/Title Date. Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 9, 1985 Mr. John Trettner The Land Use Company P.O. Box 361 Wading River, NY 11792 Re: Minor subdivision of Charles Bowman Dear Mr. Trettner: The Planning Board reviewed the file for the above mentioned application at the Monday, October 7, 1985 meeting. It was the consensus of the Planning Board to conduct a field inspection of the premises prior to any further action or recommendations. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 8£P 9 Re: Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours true, N. COUNTRY RD. · BOX 36, WADING RIVER, N.Y. "79: (5'6) 929-3575 September 4, 1985 Town of Southold Planning Board Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Diane M. Schultze Re: Application for Charles W. Bowman Dear Diane: Enclosed please find application fee of $150.00 (inspection fee) with short environmental assessment form and letter regarding grading and roads signed by myself. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact our office. Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated. Thank John Trettner JT/te Eno. Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 September 3, 1985 Mr. John Trettner Environmental Analysis Land Use Co. P.O. Box 261-N Country Road Wading River,NY 11792 3. out and returned. When we are we will schedule Re: Application for Charles Bowman Dear Mr. Trettner: We have received the above mentioned application,however, it is incomplete. The following items need to be submitted: Balance of application fee of $150 (inspection fee) Enclosed letter regarding grading and roads signed. Enclosed Short Envrionmental Assessment form filled (Part I only). in receipt of the above mentioned items, this on the next available agenda. Very truly yours, Diane M. Schultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board enc. APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF P~ 3 lg85 To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Toxvn Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the o~vner of record of the land nnder application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) John Trettner of the Land Use Co. as agent for Charles W, Bowman 2. The name of the subdlvlsionlstobeBaxter' Bowman, Lupo The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) See attached sheet The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk Count)' Clerk's office as follo~vs: Certificate of Title: No. 124,277 Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... Liber Page On ' Lib P O ' er ........................ age ...................... n ....................... , Liber Page On ' Liber Page On · as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ....................................... or as distrlbutee ............................. .. . . ................ 5. The area of the land is ....... Z, ~ ....... acres. 6. Ail taxes which are liens on the land at the date ~ereof have been paid except mo.r,¢ ....... 7. The land is encumbered by .............................................................. mortgage (s) as fol!ows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber .... .1.0.5..6.0.... Page ....... 4...6.1. ....... in original amonnt ors 43,000.00 unpaid amount $ held by William P. Biley Nelson Riley ...... address 826 BaT Blvd. Soul;ha Anna MariaI Florida (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page ....................... in original amonnt of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... .............. address .............................................................. . (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... ...................... address ......................................................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ........................ 9. The land lies in the folloxving zoning use districts . Residential 10. No part of the land lles under water ~vhether tide water, stream, pond xvater or otherwise, ex- 11. 12. eept ............................................................................... ... . The applicant shall at bis ex?ense install all required public improvements. The land (does) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if xvithin a District, is . Does Not 13. Water mains xvill be lald by ............ .' ............................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . J40~g..l~$3.~,I¥1..1~ ~.gD.t.~.B.g..qq.. ....... ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said llnes. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. as ma ns xv nsta e ........................................................ ._ and (a) (no) chat-ge will be made for installh~g said mains. If streets shown on the plat are cla reed by the appl cant to be existin,~ nubI c streets in the Suffolk County H~ghway system, annex Schedule B hereto, to show same. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing pnblic streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. There are no existing buildings or structnres ou the land which are not located and shown on the plat. Where the plat shows proposed strcets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at tile end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. In tile course of these proceedings, thc applicant will ~,ffcr proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. Submit a cop)' of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, ~tc. ~nnex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements xvill be $ .......... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be flxed at '. ............. years. The Performance Bond will be xvritten by a licensed surety company unless otherxvise shown on Schedule "F". DATE . .J~ly..29., ..t 9.~ 5 ........... 19 .... of licant) (Signature and Title) P., 0.,. itoh. 2.61 r.~,.. Gs~ugt r~.. Rd,.,..Wa~ing (Address) River, N.Y. 11792 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTy OF .... .~.?,...~..(}~,, .............. ss: Z'%Atx' day of '~"~'~" ~a3"P ., 19..~...'~., before ,ne personally came On the No. 4668958, Suffolk Counly % ........ STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ............................ ss: On the ................ day ............ of ......... · ....., 19 ....... before me personally came ........................ '.. t6"h~e kuown, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No ..................................................... ............ that is the the corporation described in aud which executed the foregoiug instrument; that ............ knows the seal of said corporatiou; that the seal affixed by order of thc board of directors of said corporation. a,,d Ihat ............ signed .............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public THE LAND TITLE REGISTRATIO TRANSFERRED FROM ..... ~.7. ~.0.~. .......... No. 124,277 FIRST REGISTERED ~[8.rch 25; 19/+6 I, 3ULIE'I-rE A. KINSELLA, Rcgistra'r, of thc County of Suffolk, in thc State of New York, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that ~ BAXTER, CIL~T.V.$ W. BO~ & I~RANK I~r~0 as Co the remaining undivided interest as tenants in of ~el. lin~ton Place, ~aityville, NY, North Country Road, Wading River, NY and North Country Road, Wadin~ River, NY thcowncr8 of an Estatc in fce simpl¢ in the following Land: ALT. ttmt certain pl. ot, piece or parcel of land, situate; lying and Being in the TO~ OF Si~ff~OtD, COUNTY OF S~rFOI~, STATE OF ~ YORK, being known and designated as lots n~nbe~ed 68, 69, 70, 71 and the southeasterly one half of lot 72 on a certain map entitled '~ap of Goose. Neck situate ac Bayv~.ew*' and filed in the suffolk County Clerk's Office on Nov~nber 22, 19/+8 as and by Hap No. 1663, and described parcels adjacent thereto when taken sether be~ more particul~vly described as'follows: BF~SN~I~, at a monument on the northeasterly s~de off ~ain ~a~viev Road, 325.0 feet southeasterly from the corner formed By the intersection of the southerly side off Smith Drive South and the northeasterly, side of ~a~n Bayv~ew Road, and RUN~Iq~ TItENCE North 39 degrees 00 m~nutes East alone lands now or fo~narly of 01tI24.~ 162.~2 feet to a monument: TI~NCE still along lands now or formerly of OBL.V,~N }lorth 60 degrees 39 m~nutes 50 seconds West 76.96 feet: ~'~CE North 70 degrees ~9 minu~es &0 seconds ~aet alor~q lands no~ or formerly of B. STAI~ ~3.86 f-et and ~lorth 39 degrees 00 minutes East, still along said lands of B. STALL and late~ along lands now or formerly of RUSKO~SK~ 358.37 i~eet to an '~ron pipe, lands now or £o~narly of O'Neill: TH~IC~ South 51 degrees 00 minutes V. ast along said lands of O~Neill, 210.0 feet~ TI~NCE North 70 degrees /+9 minutes &0 seconds Bast, 30 £eet more or ~ess ~o the no~ne~ hi~,hvmter mark of C~reek: TI~BICE southeasterly and southvesterly along the no~mal higl~eate~r mark of Ooose Creek as it winds and ~urns approximately /+60 feet (more or less) to ~ands now or gormerly o~ C, rattan: TI~NCl~ South /+~ degrees §3 minutes West along lands now or formerly of C, rattan 360 feet '(~ore or less) to lands now or !formerly of ~rattan: T~CE along mid lands now or t."ormerly of (~reen. (1) North 5~ degr. ees 00 minutes l~est 56.0 feet and (2) South 40 degrees 44 minutes 50 seconds West 166.14 fleet to the nOrtheasterly side of Hain Bayvie~ Road: THENCE North 51 degrees 00 - minutes West alor~ the northeaatezly side of Hain Bayv~e~ Road 420.65 feet to the monument, the point or place of BEGINNI~IC.. SUB.TECT to the estates, easements, enc~nbrances and charges hereunder nuted. I~EEI~ESS my hand and official seal at River- head, N.Y., 'this 19th day of November, 1984. -- -- · ReF, Is[r[r'. -- MEMORIALS DIST 1000, 1000 SEC 07600, 07800 BLIC 0300, 0700 LOT 034002, 036000~ ~}~,OEa~O~el~J~dn~%~)~es and Charges on the Land described in this Certificme of Title No. I~A 277 DOCUMENT DATE OF NUMBER KIND REGISTRATION RUNNING IN FAVOR OF TERMS OR REMARKS SIGNATURE OF REGISTRAR ~ ~o the ~ld~ and zon~ r~la~s o~ the T~ of Sout~ld. J~ RIG~, t~le and ~e~ : ~ and to land ly~ ~ t~ b~ of any s=ree2, road or ~v~e ~s h~e~ ~cluded r~$s~a~on. T~ to ~y land ly~ ~ = ~mt~ below ~he m~ ~ter m~k of ~oose Creek ~ rd/or ~es~ ~eek ts ~c1~ fr~ r~stration. ~ to c~anta ~d r~ ~ict~ns as contain~ ~ de~ ~. ~73807. T~ ~Ch the r~ht ~o ise f~ all reaso~ble ~ses in c~on ~th athos, p~t tons of lots 37, 38, and 39, Hap~ , __ '~ ~ ' of G~se Neck, as ~ch r~} :s are ~r~ und~ de~ Doc. .~73507. .................. 307955 Hort~e N~ 19-84 ~11~ P. Riles & Jane $~3,000.00 w/~C. ~ 12%. ~fect~~ Nels~ Riley all ~Ch~ ~[ses. -~ ........................ " IMPORTANT THIS OWNER'S DUPLICATE CERTIFICATE OF TITLE IS YOUR PROOF OF OWNERSHIP..THIS DOCUMENT TAKES THE PLACE OF THE DEED. THIS INSTRUMENT MUST BE PRODUCED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY TRANS- ACTION INVOLVING THE REAL PROPERTY HEREIN. IF LOST, MISPLACED OR DESTROYED, DUPLICATION WILL REQUIRE A SUPREME COURT ORDER UNDER SECTION 414 R.P.L. ExtrJet Ymm the ~ell I°'mpafly Law, Constituting Chapter 50 of the ComoiMated SECTION 400. RIGHTS OF REGISTERED OWNERS; EXCEPTIONS; INCIJbIBRANCES, ET CETERA, TO BE FILED--A person who receives a ce~tilleate of title pursuant to a ludgment of ~eglstration, except in case of frLmd to which he is n party, and a purchaser of registered real property, who takes a certificate of title for vaJtte and Jn gm'x] faith. shell hold the same free from all incumbrances, charges, trusts, liens and transfers, except those nnted on the certificate in the registrar's office, and an)' of the following which may exist: FIRST. Liens, claims or rights arising or existing under the law~ or constitution of the United States, which the statutes of this State do not ~equlre to appear of record; SECOND. Any tax, water rate or assessment, which heeemes n lien on the property after Initial registration, and for which a sale has not been made; THIRD. Any lease or n~reement for a lease, mede after or pending registration, for a period not excendlng one year, where there is actual occupation, of the land under the lease or agreement; FOURTH. ~-e~ments m' servitudes which ncerno against the property after initial registration in such manner as not to require their registration. Except as specified in the foregoing statement of exceptions, no incumbrance, charge, trust, lien or transfer shall take effect upon or over rear property the title to which has been registered, unless the Instrument eseatlnf tionand settingthereof fotthmadeSUehuponlneumhrence.the eeflifieateCharge'of tltletrUSt'coveringlien orthetransferprope~ty,has be~,n filed with the registrar, and a memorial or note- ~: ~e&,~.2.1toz"J' AgenoJ. le Please be ad~sed ~h&~ ~he Land Use Coupon7 has u~ .peru~o~on ' ~, app]~ rot el:L per~L~e neceeoar7 ~o comp~o~o ~h~e pro3o~t, Date: S ~o 96 %. ,% GOOSE CREEK TOTAL AREA MINOR 'SuBDivISfO!:-'PREPARED FOR-' · :cHARLES I ~]W. 'BOWMAN AT BAYVIEW, ......... , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY , N.Y. LOCATION MAP SCALE [%600' GOOSE CREEK ,. N %% WETLANDS S 30*06 TOTAL AREA = 7.024ec. GOOSE CREEK NOTE: ELEVATIGNS ~ CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM "TOPOSRAPHIC MAP - FIVE EASTERNTOWN$ "PREPARED FOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS. MINOR SUBDIVISION CHARLES PREPARED FOR W. BOWMAN AT BAYVIEW ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLKCOUNTY , N. Y. APR 4, 1986 MAR 27, 1986 SEPT 7, 1985 dUNE I011985 SCALE - 4.0 OSTR A/~. R AV E.~'/RIVE RHEA O N.Y. HOWARD W. YuJNG~N.¥.S,L,S. LIC. NO 45893 NO. 84- 1206 LOCATION MAP SCALE I'~= 6OO~ GOOSE CREEK GOOSE CREEK // oo / ~ o~ ;'a) // ii It / , ~ ~ ,' . .,.>, <~ .. ,,(~ .~/ ~~ % ~/ ~ - / .,/ ~ "v ~' I ~, ,' ~/ ~' Z~. ,' ,' ~ / )~1. ~, , ~ ~ x / ~ -~ ~ // // ~0: / ~. ~ / FOR THE SUFFOLK C~NTY DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS. ~, - v~.~} ,~ ... / %~ ~ ./.. ,/~ -, ,, j ,,. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP = ~ · ~ .... ~- ~O,~ SEP 3 1985 ~'~' ~'"'""° ~*'°' MINOR SUBDIVISION PREPARED FOR ' "' "-' CHARLES W. BOWMAN ~, __ ~- '/'""--_~ "'""" ~?,~ 'AT · SUFFOLK COUNTY , N.Y. JUNE 10,1985 ~YPIC~4 ~Or pLaN '' SCALE [": 50' NO. B4- 1~6