HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-75.-4-21 APPROVED BY
PLANNING BOARD
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
June 30, 1992
SCOFF L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Rudolph H. Bruer
Edson and Bruer
P.O. Box 1466 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
RE:
Proposed Set-off for
George Stepnoski
SCTM#1000-75-4-21 & 22
Dear Mr. Bruer:
The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town
Planning Board on Monday, June 29, 1992:
The final public hearing, which was held at 7:35 P.M. was
closed.
The following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, George Stepnoski, is the owner of the property
known and designated as SCTM#1000-75-4-21 & 22, located at Main
Bayview and Ba~water Avenue; and
WHEREAS, this minor subdivision, to be known as Minor
Subdivision for George Stepnoski, is for 2 lots on 21.044 acres;
and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the
State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617,
declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on
February 24, 1992; and
WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said
subdivision application at the Town hall, Southold, New York on
June 29, 1992; and
Page 2
George Stepnoski
WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision
Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and
be it therefore,
RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and
authorize the Chairman to endorse the final survey dated June 1,
1992.
Enclosed please find a copy of the map which was endorsed
by the Chairman. The mylar maps, which were also endorsed by
the Chairman, must be picked up at this office and filed in the
office of the County Clerk. Any plat not so filed or recorded
within sixty (60) days of the date of final approval, shall
become null and void.
Please contact this office if you have any questions
regarding the above.
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Encl.
cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
Scott Russell, Assessors Office
THIS MINOR SUBDIVISION IS FOR ,~ LOTS O~ACRES~LOCA~'EDDN
SCTM# I000- '7~-~- J.~ - ~ ~ ....
MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD)
Complete application received
Application reviewed at work session
Applicant advised of necessary revisions
Revised sub mission received
Sketch plan approval -~ ~th condlt~ons
Lead Agency Coordination
SEQRA determination
Sent to Fire Commissioner
Receipt of firewe'll location
Notification to applicant to include on final map
Sent to County Planning Commission
Receipt of County Report
Review of SCPC report
Draft Covenants and Restrictions received
Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed
Filed Covenants and Restrictions received
Receipt of mylars and paper prints with
Health approval
Final Public Hearing
Approval of subdivision
-with conditions
Endorsement of subdivision
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT
To the Planning Board of the Tbxvn of Southold:
The undersigned applicant hereby applies for ffr~ll')~:ix~ (final)approval of a subdivision plat in
accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town
Planning Board, and represents and sta'tes as follows:
The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the
oxvner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said
land under application.) Author±zed agent for contract vendee, Rudolph H. Bruer
The name of the subdivision is to be
Southold Fire District, Bayview
The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed
suggested.)
4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk Countv Clerk's office as
follows:
Liber Unavailable Page ~ On ....................... ;
Liber . ....................... Page ...................... On ....................... ;
Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ;
Liber ........................ Page ...................... On
Liber ........ · ~
................ lane .. .................... On
as devised under the Last \Viii and Testament of
or as distributee
5. The area of the land is .Zl,.0.44 .......... acres.
(5. All taxes which are liens on the Iand at the date hereo[ have been paid except ............
NONE
7. The land is encnmbered by NONE
mortgage (s) as follows: ..............................................................
(a) Mortgage recorded in Liber ' · ........... Page .................. in original amount
of $ .............. nnpaid amount $ ..................... held by .................... ~..
.............. address
fl>) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page ....................... in origin31 amount
of ' un'paid amonnt 8.
.......... · .................... held hv ..... ,,,,
address
Iq,.ANNING BOARD .
(c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount
of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ......................
...................... address
8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ........................
NONE
9. The land lies in the follo~ving zoning use districts .......................................
...R.-.8.Q .................................................................................
I0. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex-
I NONE
copt ...................................................................................
II. The applicant shall at his ~xpense install all required public improvements.
12. The land (does) (does not) lie in a \Vater District or Water Snpply District. Name of Dis-
trict, if xvithin a District, is NONE
13. \Vater mains will be laid by NONE
and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains.
14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by EXISTING
..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said
lines.
15. Gas mains will be instal,[le(l by ...... N..O.N.E. ................................................
and (a) (no) charoe will be made for installing said mains.
16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed 1)v the applicant to be existing public streets in the
Suffolk Coouty Ilighway system, anoex' Schedule "B" hereto, to show same.
17. If streets shown on ~he plat are claimed by the apl)licant to be existing public streets in the
Town of Southold I Iighway system, anaex Schedule"C" hereto to show same.
18. There are no existi?g-buildings or structures on the land which are not located ami shoxvu
on the plat. NOllE
19. Where tile plat shmvs proposed strbcts which are extet~sions .f streets Gu adjoinint~ sub-
divisiou maps beret.fore filed, there are no reserve strips at thc end of the streets on said
existing maps at their conjutmtions with the pr.lmsed streets.
20. Iu the c.urse .f these proceedings, the alq)lic;mt will .ffer pr.of .f tillc ;is required by Sec.
335 of the l,~yal PropErty Law.
21. Submit a copy ~f proposed deed for lots shoe,'i:~:4 all restricti.os, covenants, crc.- :\nn;~x
Schedule "D".
22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be
$...-.0-: .... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the matnrity of the
Performance Bond be fixed at ...T.07' ........ years. The Performance Bond xvill be written by
a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F".
DATE December
(S~daturk,/ahd Title)
Rudolph H. Bruer, Authorized agent
P.O. Box 1466, Main Road
"n .................
STATE OF NE\V YORK, COUNTY OF ...S..U.F~.0.L..K ...................... ss:
On the .... .~..~.--'~.. .......day of....D.e..c.e.m.b.e..r ................. 19.9~ ..... before me persoually came
....... Rudolph. Ii...gr~xer .................. to me known to be the iudividual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ....h.e ....... executed the same.
otar) ubhc
STATE OF NEVv' YORK, COUNTY OF ........................ ~.m..,~i~*si~.
Ou the ................ day ............ of .............. , 19 ....... before me personally came
....................... to me known, who being by me duly sworn (lid de-
pose and say that ......... '... resides at No.
............................... that .......................... is the ..........
the corporation described in and which executed thc forcgoin.k~ instrument; that ............ kno(vs
the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of thc board of directors of said corporati,n.
rtt;d that ............ signed .............. name thereto by like order.
Notary Public
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED
WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD
Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning
Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer
to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate
these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate
evidence,
1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel?
(Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined
by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference)
Yes
2. Are there any other premises under your ownership
abutting this parcel? Yes
3. Are there any building permits pending on
this parcel?
Yes
4. Are there any other applications pending
concerning this property before any other
department or agency?(Town , State, County, etc.)
Yes
5. Is there any application pending before
any other agency with regard to a different
project, on this parcel?
Yes
6. Was this property the subject of any prior
application to the Planning Board?
Yes
7. Does this property have. a valid certificat&
of occupancy, if yes please submit a copy of same Yes
I c/codify that the above statements are true and will be relied
on/~ th/~ P~%~n~Board in considering this application
~'i~¢~a~u~/~ ~ ~'~pr*p'erty owner or authorizeS, agent ff'%~ i~ ,~_~~[?'d ~t~ '~ ~qlL~ [~. 0
' ' SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
Attachment to questionnaire for/the Planning Board
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss:
On the ~ day of ~391~f--, 19~, before me personally
came
Rudolph H. Bruer
to me known to be the
individual described in'and who executed the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he
executed the same.
Notary
Public
BESS~IE L AUSTIN
~ry Public, State.of
~1
C
.£
14.16-4 12/87)--Text 12
f,PROJECT I.D. NUMBER
Appendix C .
State Environmental Quality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
PART I~PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor)
1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME
Southold Fire District Bayview purchase
3. PROJECT LOCATION:
Municipality Southold County Suffolk
SEQR
4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map)
East by Main Bayview Road; South by Freeman's Lane a/k/a Baywater Avenue
SCTMf~ 1000-075 . 00-04 . 00-p/o 022. 000
5. IS PROPOSED ACTION:
[] Exl)anslon [] ModificatlonlalteraUon
6, DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
The purchase of four acres of vacant agriculture land for the eventual construction
of firehouse auxiliary building.
7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFF CTED:
Initially ~/, 0/'/~~E acres Ultimately 3. ,~_ (~'~' acres
8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS?
[] Yes [] No If NO. describe briefly
9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE iN ViCINiTy OF PROJECT?
[] Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial
Describe:
[] Agriculture
[] ParkJForesllOpen space [] Other
DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL,
STATE OR LOCAL)?
[~Yes [] No tf yes. list agency(s) and permitlapprovals
Southold Town Planning Board - permission to divided property into two parcels,
consisting ofl~,~acres and~,~$~ acres
DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACT~C~'~ HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL?
[] Yes ~ NO I~ y~'J, list agency name and permiDapproval
12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMiT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION?
[] Yes [~No
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
Appllcant/spons~ame: Southold Fire District Date:
l If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you area state agency, ~m~l~teth~
Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this ass(
OVER
1
PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency)
A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY ' RESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617,127 If yes, Ihe review process and use the FULL EAF.
S. WiLL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 6t7.67 If No, a negative declaration
may be superseded by another involved agency·
C. COULD ACTION RESULT tN ANy ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwrlRen. It legible)
Cl. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal,
potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briehy:
C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain brlefl'
C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly:
C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity ot use of land or other natural resources? ~xpialn brief
C5. Growth, subsequent development, or re~ated activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly·
C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not iden f ed i'n C1-C57 Explain briefly.
C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly.
D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS?
[] Yes r~ No It Yes, explain briefly
PART III~Dt:I'U.I'IMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE ('To be completed by Agency)
INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant.
Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (al setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d)
irreversibility; (el geographic scope; and (fl magnitude. If necessaly, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that
explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed.
[] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts ~vhich MAY
occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration.
[] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting
documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts
AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination:
SCHEDULE "A#
All that tract or parcel of vacant land, situate, lying
and being at Southold, in the Town of Southold, county of
Suffolk and State of New York, bounded North by other land of
George A. Stepnoski, 520 feet, more or less; East by Main
Bayview Road 217.25 feet; South by Freeman's Lane also known
as Baywater Avenue, 525 feet, more or less; and West by the
several lands of Foster, Paul Montgomery, Fickeissen and Baker
324.04 feet.
Together with a parcel of vacant land fifty feet in width
having a frontage of 50 feet on South Harbor Road, the
southerly line thereof extending easterly along the northerly
line of land of Baker 150 feet and then continuing an
additional 50 feet along the northerly line of the premises
above described for the purposes of provided access to and
from said premises and to and from South Harbor Road.
SCHEDULE
Main Bayview Road, Baywater Avenue and South Harbor Road
are existing public streets in the Town of Southold highway
system (per Southold Town clerk's Office).
16 ~CEMBER 9, 1991
· PLANNING BOARD
Mr. Edwards, Mr. McDonald.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
Mr. Orlowski: Oregon Road Recycling - SCTM 91000-83-3-4.5.
Done already.
Mr. Orlowski: At this time we have some people that have
scheduled appointments. Mr. Rudy Bruer is here to discuss the
parcel for the Southold Fire District.
Mr. Rudy Bruer: The Fire District is purchasing some property
at Bayview for the purposes of a substation for emergency and
auxiliary equipment to service the Bayview and Peconic area.
They essentially feel that there is potential for loss of life~
particularly in the summer time. for the inadequate response time
that traffic and whatever might take to get a emergency vehicle
for instanc~ from the fire house in town to out to the end of
Bayvie~ and'~hey think it is essential to have a substation
there. This property has become available and it is large
enough and suits all their needs,~!has access on three different
roads, on-the bottom. They specifically asked fo~.and received.~
this fifty foot access off to South Harbor which has a
firewell midway on the Sepnoski farm not too far away, down
here~and access off End they can get to just about anywhere down
there and up to Peconic. We would like to do this by way of a
set-off. As a matter of fact tomorrow, if you read the paper,
there is a resolution for the funding of this~subject to of
course, the Board here approving it eventually. I will get the
application in at the meeting. Actually, I thought I had
submitted it.
Mr. Ward: What are they actually planning to build there, what
is going to be housed?
Mr. Bruer: Initially, it is going to be ~a emergency vehicle
and then there will be some fire equipment. That is all at this
point. It is solely because the population has grown so much
out there that they feel that particularly at this point the
emergency vehicles, somebody is going to die because of the
response time. Particularly in the summer time. This is ideal,
it is the main access to Bayview, you can shoot right down
there. You can get to Peconic, it is near water for its own
purposes and the property is large enough and the~'~fortunate to
have somebody who is willing to sell it to them. I agreed to do
it as a service, actually just to get it through because the
owner wasn't about to do it and we agreed we would take it upon
ourselves to do it as a condition of the sale. They are paying
a fair price for it.
PLANNING BOARD
17 eCEMBER 9, 1991
Mr. Orlowski: Does anybody have any questions?
Mr. Ward: Do you plan to have access off all three roads?
Mr. Bruer: Well, the idea would be, I assumed because it was
very important to them to be able to say that they could get out
this way. I guess fence it off because they have ~ fifty feet
wide and they can get their trucks out. I would imagine it
would be on this street here. Bayview Avenue facing out and
they will get going on it as soon as they can. One of the
things we are going to have to do with respect to the purchases
is go through the SEQRA process because it is a fire district,
to coordinate the whole thing, here rather than having it
haphazard.
Mr. Orlowski: Do you want us to coordinate the whole thing?
Mr. Bruer: I would like to get together with it but I would
like to get it going sooner on that end of it otherwise I'm
going to have to do it myself and I wouldn't want to have to
have you redo it.
Mr. McDonald: Ail we would need would be some idea of a
building envelope and maybe the elevation of the building. I'm
not even sure we need drawing elevations but we do need height.
Mr. Scopaz: Well, you might be concerned about the setting of
the building because of the slope on this property.
Mr. McDonald: I'm not so concerned about that part of the
review because if they wanted to do this themselves they could~
~ut I want to make sure that if we are going to do the SEQRA
~hat we are not leaving th~en for any kind of litigation on
tha~,an~ ~f we do'~without having any kind of building envelope
or some idea of what the building is, they are going to say it
wasn't a thr6~g~ investigation because clearly we didn't even
know where the building was going to be~so how did we do a SEQRA
on that part of it. That is the action you will be taking, the
construction of the building.
Mr. Bruer: This is strictly for the cutting up of it. That
is what we are concerned about at this point.
Mr. McDonald: I understand>but the fire department is n~ party
to the subdivision of the property.
Mr. Bruer: In one technical sense yes, in another sense no.
I mean we are,, t~he contractual purpose of the property and ~e do
have a equitable interest in the property.
Mr. McDonald: But, by oDr code, you can't do that. I don't .'
think it really matters.~f we do the whole thing we can lock'the
whole thing all up rather quickly. Do they have any idea where
the building is going to be or anything at all?
PLANNING BOARD
18
CEMBER 9, 1991
Mr. Bruer: I don't know if they have anything specific at
this moment as I said there is a meeting tomorrow, the election
for the commissioner is on for tomorrow.
Mr. McDonald: I would think that all we need is the envelope.
We don't need the building and we can wrap the whole thing down
in one move.
Mr. Ward: The more you can show the better.
Mr. Bruer: My only thing is, it is like any Board it is a
matter of getting everybody together. I will get this in as
soon as I can.
Mr. Orlowski: Just get the application in and if you get a
footprint on there we can do the whole thing.
Mr. Bruer: O.K., thank you very much.
Mr. Ward: A description of what they propose to do would be
helpful even if they don't have it drawn up.
Mr. McDonald:
part of it.
So we can put it into the record for the SEQRA
Mr. Bruer: They did have a informal meeting early in the fall
or late summer in the paper and there was no opposition.
Mr. Orlowski: O.K., another thing here.~ A bond ~for the
Southold Villas.
Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, I would like to offer the following
resolution.
RESOLVED that ~the Southold Town Planning Board adopt the
revised bond assue for Phase 1 of Southold Villas~ated December
9, 199~ and to recommend same to the Town Boar~.t~ revise~.bond
estimate for Phase l~n the amount of $358,130.00 and an
inspection fee of $21,488.00. The bond estimate for Phase 2 is
to remain as adopted June 24, 1991.
Mr. Latham: Second.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the
motion? All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards,
Mr. Orlowski, Mr. McDonald.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
BUILDING-STRUCTUre INVENTORY FORM
DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION
NEW YORK STATE PARKS AND RECREATION
ALBANY, NEW YORK {51 ~ 474-0479
FOR USE ONLY
UNIQUE SITE NO.
QUAD
SERIES
NEG. NO.
· ~'; YOUR NAME: Town of Southold / SPLIA DATE: January 1987
YOUR ADDRESS: Town Hall, Main Road TELEPHONE:(S16) 765-1892
SouZhold, L.I.N.Y. 11971
ORGANIZATION (i£any): Southold Town Community Development Office
:' ~ ~'- "IDENTIFICATION .,
'-: .:?.' '~l. BUILDING NAME(S): Overton house
· ~;~-'"~ '. ' 2. COUNTY: Suffolk TOWN/CITY: Southold
· ~ . 3. STREET LOCAT1ON:Baywater Road, south side
'df' ~.~.~4. OWNERSHIP: ' a publ c [] Ix private []
~'~ ~. ~ :~:~:~ .
'.~..;~,'~ :.&',.,5. PRESENT O~ER' ~rl~tz
ADDRESS:
~,~.~':)J':6. USE: Original: Residence Present: residence
· :k~; Z ACC~SSIBILITM TO P~IC: ~x~efior visibl~ F~om public ~oad: Yes ~ ~o ~
~.-.~,..~ Interior accessible: Explain -
.... ~" DESCRIPTION ''~ ' ~ --~ .....
8, BUILDING ~ a. clapboard ~ b. stone ~ , 'E brick ~ o'~d. board and
MATERIAL: e. cobblestone ~ f. shingles ~ g. stucco ~ other:
V1LLAGE:SOuthold
SD 102
9. STRUCTURAL
SYSTF. M:
(if km~nj
I0. CONDITION:
I I. INTEGRITY:
a. wood frame with interlocking joints []
b, wood frame with light members []
c. masonry load bearing·walls []
':<--_'.!~'d. metal (explain]
e. other
a. excellent [] b. good [] c. fair []
a. original site [] b. moved [] if sc,when?
c. Iisi fi~ajor alterations and dates (if know~
House "restored" circa 1983.
SD-RSM XVI-6
12. PllOTO: From West
North (front) elevation and
western elevation
d. deteriorated ~
13. MAP:
N.Y.S.
DOT Southold Quad
SD 102
14. THREATS TO BUILDING: a, none known [] b. zoning [] c. roads []
. d. developers [] e. deterioration []
' c ,~, f. other: ['-~ ·' ,~ ',
RELATED OUTBUILDINGS AND PROPERTY: . .
"- ':,.~ ., ~ f a. barn[] ,~b. carnage hougel-I~l c~garage
d. privy {~'" e. s.hed. ~1, r ' f.'greenhouse []
' ,.'7... o,, ,~ (:-~,-~ d-<,-g, shop [] 'h, gardens,[~]'-.-',~ -'
i. landscape features: ~.~rioultura'1 area
j. other:
[6. SURROUNDINGS OF THE BUILDING (chegk more than.one if necessary):
a. open land [] _b. woodland []
- (o ':~c:c{:i ' ' c. scattered buildings [] ' ' ~..- ,.,, -
· -;, .~ .' ': '" d..denseiy built-up [] e. commercial [] .
· .... ·: - . f. industrial [] 'g. resident al []
17. INTERRELATIONSHIP OF BUILDING AND SURROUNDINGS: , . ' ....
(Indicate if building or structure is in an historic district)
In low density area, surrounded by farmland and open
~ f~elds and wooded areas. ~ ....
18. OTHER NOTABLE FEATURES OF BUILDING AND SITE (including interior features if known): ~'.. ~'~2'
l~-story, 4-bay centered chimney house with off center
entrance. Brick foundation. 1½-story gambrel roof wing
on rear.
SIGNIFICANCE
19. DATE OF INITIAL CONSTRUCTION: I room 1600'sl enlarged ear~7 1800's.
ARCHITECT:
BUILDER: " "~, :'-" ',',- r", .... ,x,-'.... '
20.HISTORICAL AN D ARCHITECTURAL IMPORTANCE: .
Overton house in 187~ and 1909.
It is reported that the original i room cabin was .~...~:
used as slave quarters. The house and 30 acres were
given to a favorite slave, A1 Freemans, who lived
here for many years.. '-'":
The house was later owned by Robert Overton. *
~ - ,, ...... !~; ;.<j ~, ,
21. SOURCES: Beers, Comstock, Cline. Atlas of Long Island. 1873
E. Belcher-Hyde.. Atlas of Suffolk County. L. Io" '~-~... ~:i:
' vol. 2, North S~.de. Sound Shore. 1909 , · ::
· I~ng Island Heritage. August 1984 ..... ?-',;~ ,.:.
~ 'r~E~IE. U.S. Coast Survey. T-68. 1838 :.-
.... . . · , -. . -:,..~ ? .,. ~:!~::.:. .; ~,~
assistant.F°rm prepared by Rosemary ~kye Mor~tt, r.e.s,~~
Dl',t;-~ l RU(ITL'RI£ INVENTORY FORM
[.OR ItIS l ORIC PRESERVATION
i£%s ~ ORK g l \TE PARKS AND RECREATION
II\NY. NI:WYORK 151g 474-0479
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
UNIQUE SITE NO.
QUAD__
SERIES __
NEG. NO._
YOUR NAME: Town of Southold / SPLIA DATE: J_anuar~7
YOUR ADDRESS:Town Hall, Nain Road TELEPHONE· (516) 765-1892
~OU~3110~d~ L.I., N.Y.11971 '
ORGANIZATION (if any): Southold Town. Community Development Office
IDENTIFICATION .
I. BUILDING NAMERS): Howell Farm '
2. COUNTY: Suffolk TOWN/CITY: Southold VILLAGE: Southold
3. STREET LOCATION: South Harbor Road~ west side
4. OWNERSHIP: a. public [] h private []
5. PRESENT OWNER: t",oc~'c'~ W~].'IS ADDRESS:
6. USE: Original: R~.~d~nee Pre~ent: Residence
7. ACCESSIBILITY TO PUBLIC: Exterior visible from public road: Yes [] No []
Interior accessible: Explain
DESCRIPTION ~ £ , ,'.;. ~.~ ~ ~ , r .... ' ~ ~' :"c'r',
8. BUILDING' '~ ~'dlapboar'd'[] b. ston~ [] ~ ~ c.'brick [] d. b6ard ~nd batten []
MATERIAL e. cobblestone [] E shingles []
STRUCTURAL a. wood frame with interlocking joints []
SYSTEM: b. wood frame with light members []
(if k.n~},vn) c.- masonry load bearing walls []
~ d. metal (explain)
e. other
IO. CONDITION:
I 1. INTEGRITY:
a. excellent [] b. good [] c. fair [] d. deteriorated []
a. original site [~ b. moved [] if sc.when?
c. list major alterations and dates (if known):
SD-RSM X-lla
12. PIIOTO: From east
~ast (front) elevation
13. MAP: N.Y.S.
DOT Southold Quad
14.
THREATS TO BUILDING: a. none known [] b. zoning [] c. roads
d. developers [] e. deterioration []
RELATE,D" OUTBUILDINGS AND PROPERTY ....
d. pr W~. ~. shqd
· ' i. landscape features:
j. other: ca, 18
16. SURROUNDINGS OF THE BUILDING (check more than.one if ne~:essary)i
a. open land [] b. woodland {~
!ic~ 'g.~,?~.: c. scattered buildings [] ., -., :. /.."-
~- -~, '~ ,:,, ':" ,'d. densely built.up [] . e~ .commercial
:,'J -' '_ ' ' f. industrial [~] g. residential [] '-
- - . '. '" ' h. other: ,.
17 INTERRELATIONSHIP.OF BUILDING AND SURROUNDINGS:
(Indicate if building or structure is in an historic district)
South Harbor Rd.* is a two-lane road that leads from 'Main
'Road to the bay areal it is sparsely built up wi~h open
fi.e.lds and woods.
18.
SIGNIFICANCE
19. DATE OF INITIAL CONSTRUCTION: 1895
OTHER NOTABLE FEATURES OF BUILDING AND SITE (including interior features
2~-story, 3-bay, side entrance plan cross-gable ~ouse.
De~orated shin4~les in the gables. 2/2 windows.
.. ARCHITECT:
20~ HISTORI(AL AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPORTANCE· ·
· hl.s wel~l preserved 1.ate 19th century house and its
~rep-t: ear±y f?rm build~.ngs preserve a farm complox that
was once ~yp2cal on the North Fork. - ~-~ --~ ......
21. SOURCES: *Interview Georae Wells. Glen Head. L. Io 1-/86
H.V. Tares. Barffs of LonE Island. 19B1 '
Hyde & Co. Atlas of Long Island. 1895
22. TH~ME: For.m prepared by Rosemary Skye Moritt,
SD 102
SODOM SCHOOL DISTRICT
in 1840
Nanlvs and tracin e~',t idtd h': II"a;land
/
map from:
WALT WHI~4AN AT SOUTHOLD
by Katherine Molinoff
C.W.Post College
#4 of series of monographs
SD 102 ~ ~
North Fork Auction
at Freemans Farm
By Judy Hilovsky
An original 1600s saltbox
house will be the setting for
auctioneer Col. Marianne
Slough's Aug 18 auction.
clude oak and victorian
furniture, old and new
quilts, musical instrument~,
linens, books and much
moro. Viewing will begin at
9 a.m_, followed by the auc-
The 2nd Annual Free~ tion, under tenL~, at 10 a.m.
mans Farmhouse Auction ~5oan told the Long Island
will be held at the historic /l~teritage the history of the
farm residence of another homestead as it was rolated
, ..~ng wn~ ~w¥'\ bought the house
la Genova, will auction off x The original saltbox
morothan3001ots, whichin- house consisted only of
what is currently the dining
room. During the late~17~and-
early 1800s the house was on
a parcel of land which was
farmed with the. help of
slaves. The house was be-
lieved to be used as the
quarters for those slaves.
An addition was added
around this time and at the
end of the Civil War, the
house and'30 acres was
given to a favorite slave,-Al
Freemans. who chah'~d ~
r6a]n~ of the farm. He lived
in the house with his wife
and one son for many years,
though the exact dates are
not known. The house was
then owned by R. obert
Over{on. '
~ the years~ additions
have been added and rooms
have been changed, though
the original structure still
stands. The Fr~eWone
Farmhous~_ will be a pic-
-~r~sque and historic back-
drop to this sale of antiques.
For moro information a bout
the auction call 765-2003.
OWNER '
FORMER ~/NER ~'
RES.
LAND
~o0~
S~AS.
IMP.
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD /~/_
STREET VILLAGE DIST.i SUB. LOT
N !~, ' E ACR. ,|, '
S ~ W ~)~ ~E OF BUILDING
VL -- FARM COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. V~lue
TOTAL
?~<oo V
DATE
AGE BUILDING CONDITION
NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE
FARM Acre Value
Tillable 1
Ti~ble 2
T~J~b le 3
Woodland
Swampland
Brushland
House Plot
Total
Value Per
Acre
,~1 z. b~
boo'
FRONTAGE ON WATER
FRONTAGE ON ROAD
DEPTH
BULKHEAD
/DOCK
COLOR
M. Bldg.
Extension
Extension
Extension
Porch
Porch
Breezeway
Garage
Patio
O.B.
Total
Foundation
lasement
:xt. Walls
Bath
Floors
tnterior Finish
Heat
Fire Place
Type Roof Roams 1 st Floor
Recreation Roam Rooms 2nd Floo~
Dormer
Driveway
TOWN OF
SOUTHOLD PROPERTY
RECORD
CARD
OWNER
~OwNE~ /-'
STREET
VILLAGE
DISTRICT~ [ SUB.
ACREAGE, '-?,~
TYPE OF BUILDING
LOT
LAND
SEAS.
IMP.
VL.
TOTAL
FARM
DATE
i ql//7~--.
COMM.
REMARKS
J CB.
MISC.
AGE BUILDING CONDITION
NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE
Form Acre Value Per Acre Value
Tiiloble 1
2
Tillable 3
Wcodland
Swampland
Brushland
House Plot
Total
Extension ~. X l3 z 7 ~° O'~'~, ~.5-o 2. ~ ~/ Basement ~ ~ Fl~rs
~__sion / ~ X / ~' = Z ~ ~ ,~ ~o / o ~ ~ Interior Finish
Extension Fire Place ~ Hem
Porch Attic
Porch Rooms 1st Flor
Breezeway Patio R~ms 2nd Flor
Garage /~ ~ /~ .. ~G ~u /~ ~ Driveway
CERTIFICATE OF ABANDONMENT
PURSUANT TO SUB-DIVISION 3 OF SECTION 335 OF
THE REAL PROPERTY LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
BAYVIEW SOUTH HARBOR ~ARTNERSHIP, having an office at
/=,', ~'~',~'c,,.4' .,~z for the purpose
of abandoning and cancelling the sub-divisions of a certain tract
of land, owned by us and hereafter described, pursuant to Sub-
Division 3 of Section 335 of the Real Property Law of the State of
New York, do hereby certify:
1. That a certain map sub-dividing such tract of land and
other land situate in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and
State of New York, into lots, plots, blocks and streets, entitled
"Map of GEORGE A. STEPNOSKI," filed in the office of the Clerk of
the County of Suffolk on August 3, 1992 as Map No. 9255.
2. That more than 2 years have elapsed since the filing of
said map.
3. That the tract of land owned by the undersigned is situate
in the Town of Southold and consists of an area not less than one
half acre consisting of the part of lot, described as follows:
All that certain plot, piece of parcel of land situate, lying
and being at Bayview in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and
State of New York, being known and designated as Part of Lot 1 as
shown on a map entitled "Map of George A. Stepnoski" which map was
filed with the Suffolk County Clerk on August 3, 1992 as Map No.
9255, which part of lot is bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Main Bayview
Road, distant 217.25 feet northerly from the intersection of the
northerly side of Baywater Avenue (Freeman's Lane) with the
westerly side of Main Bayview Avenue;
RUNNING THENCE the following three courses and distances along
the northerly side of land now or formerly of the Southold Fire
District:
1.) South 73 degrees 38 minutes 20 seconds West 500.50 feet;
2.) North 8 degrees 20 minutes 40 seconds West 50.00 feet;
3.) South 72 degrees 32 minutes 50 seconds West 200.00 feet
to the easterly side of South Harbor Road;
THENCE along the easterly side of South Harbor Road, North 8
degrees 20 minutes 40 seconds West 814.79 feet;
following tw6 courses and distances:
1.) North 79 degrees 22 minutes 290.11 feet;
2.) North 10 degrees 03 nds West 53.53 feet to
the westerly end
~sterly end of Grange Road, southerly along
~rve bearing to the left having a Radius of 50.00 feet
FILED.
1) 6 5 gABS. No.
NOV 2 5 1997_
RLED NOV 251997
THENCE North 79 degrees 22 minutes 10 seconds East, ~2J.iD
feet;
THENCE the following three courses and distances along land
now or formerly of Glenn Smith and Ellen Rosenbush Smith;
1.) South 10 degrees 37 minutes 50 seconds East 296.66 feet;
2.) South 70 degrees 37 minutes 50 seconds East 308.14 feet;
3.) North 26 degrees 31 minutes 00 seconds East 262.73 feet;
THENCE the following two courses and distances along land now
or formerly of Stepnoski;
1.) South 02 degrees 27 minutes 00 seconds East 85.00 feet;
2.) North 88 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds East 129.00 feet
to the northwesterly side of Main Bayview Road;
THENCE the following two courses and distances along the
northwesterly side of Main Bayview Road:
1.) South 26 degrees 31 minutes 00 seconds West 132.91 feet;
2.) South 25 degrees 50 minutes 20 seconds West 422.81 feet
to the point or place of BEGINNING. 4. That the Lot(s) above
mentioned is(are) unimproved for the use of any owning occupant or
any other persons having an interest in any part of the said sub-
division of lands as shown on the aforesaid map.
5. That the said part of Lot is hereby abandoned and
cancelled and effective with due approval and recording thereof,
said part of lot shall no longer exist.
6. Endorsed hereon will be the approval of the Board of
Assessors of the Town of Southold.
7. Submitted herewith is an Abstract of Title to said part of
Lot to be abandoned covering a period of at least 20 years last
past and a certificate of a licensed Title Company to the effect
that there are no unpaid taxes or tax liens against said lands.
~n witness whereof,
this Certificate is made and executed at
this ~ day of
Partner of BAYVIEW SOUTH HARBOR
PATNERSHIP
STATE OF NEW YORK)
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ss:
On the ~ ~ 76 day of ,'%/O~'f~ ~ ~ ~ , 19 ~ ~, before me
personally came ,4'7/ c~,~ F~ ~. C~) ,~-~
a partner of BAYVIEW SOUTH HARBOR PARTNERSHIP to me known to be the
individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument
and acknowledged that he executed the same.
Notary Public
ANTHONY RAWLUK
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 4998490 *
Corn Qu~lifiecl in Suffolk County
m~smon Expires June 29, 199
I, the undersigned, the Assessor of the Town of Southold,
Suffolk County, New York, do hereby approve and consent to the
foregoing Certificate of Abandonment.
Dated:
STATE OF NEW YORK)
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
On the ~ ~ day of
personally came -~co~'7-'
noso
, 19 ~/, before me
, to me known
to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same.
ANTHONY RAWLUK
Notary Public, State of New York
NO. 4998490 ' ~
Qualified in Suffolk CountY ~,~
Commission Expires June 29. 199 ~Z.
PHO~:: 852-2000
SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Edwar~ p. Romaine,. COUNTY CLERK
~Town of Southold Assessor
own of Sou{hold Planning Board
Chief Deputy County~T~easurer
To Whom This May Concern:
The Subdivision Map Of:
Was Filed,
Filed Number,
A}.stract Number,
Township,
Owner:
Southold
Very truly yours,
County Clerk
Map Deparlment
Form No. 49
LEGA NOTICE
Notice of
Public Hearing
NOT~CE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
pursuant m ~fion 276 of thc Town
Law, · pubEc hearing will be bold by
thc Somhold Town Planning Board. at
the Town Hall, Main Road, Sonthold,
New York in said Town o~ the 29th
day of June 1992 on the question of
thc following:
.7:30 P.M. Final approval for thc
minor subdivision for George Step-
noskl at Southold, in the Town of
Southold. County of Suffolk and the
State of New York. Suffolk County
Tax Map Numbor. 1000-75-4-21 &
22.
The property is bordered on the
north by land ~ )r formerly of
Gcorge Stepnos._., on the east by
Main Bayvicw Road; on the south by
on the west by South Harbor Road, by
land now or formerly of Foster, by
land now or formerly of Montgomery,
by land now or formerly of Fickeis-
sen, and by land now or formerly of
Baker.
7:35 P.M. Preliminary approval for
the major subdivision for Briarcliff
Acres st Southold, in the Town of
Southold. Coonty of Suffolk and
State of New York. Suffolk County
T~x Map Number. 1000-75-2-8 & 9.
The property is bordered on the
northwest by the Long Island Rail
Road; on the northeast by land now or
formerly of Miresdizlk and the Town
of Soutbold; on the southeast by land
now or formerly of John Nierod~lk,
by land now or formerly of Tobin, by
land now or formerly of Roben~ Her-
ing, by l~nd now or formerly of Janet
A. Davis, and by Main Road (S,R.
25); and on the south by Maple
Avenue, by land now or formerly of
Barney Ovsianik & Jennie Ovsianlk,
by land now or formerly of Thomas
C. & Jeannette Jerome, by land now
or formerly of James G. & Mary K.
Brewer, by land now or formerly of
Brush; on the southwest by land now
or formerly of Tobin.
Any person desiring Io be heard on
the above matter shoald appear at the
time and place specified.
Dated: June 15, 1992
BY ORDER OF THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANN~G BOARD
Bennett Orlowski, fr.
741.~6-1TJu I 8
STATE OF NEW YORK)
)SS:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
said County, being duly sworn, ~ that he/she Is Principal
Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, · Woekty Newspaper,
published et Mettltuok, In the Town of Suuthold, County of
Suffolk and State of New Yo~t, and that the Notice of which
the annexed is a printed copy, has bess regula~y published in
said Newspaper once each week for / weeks
successively, commencing on the ~ day of
Principal Clerk
of Mattituck, In
Sworn to before me this
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
LEGAL NOTICE
Notice of Public Hearing
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV-
EN that pursuant to Section 276
of the Town Law, a public hear-
ing will be held by the Southold
Town Planning Board, at the
Town Hall, Main Road,
Southold, New York in said
Town on the 29th day of June
1992, on the question of the
following:
7:30 P.M. Final approval for
the minor subdivision for
George Stepnoski at Southold,
in the Town of Southold, Coun-
ty of Suffolk and State of New
York. Suffolk County Tax Map:
Number 1000-75-4-21 & 22.
The property is bordered on
the north by land now or
formerly of George Stepnoski;
on the east by Main Bayview
Road; on the south by
Freeman's Lane or Baywater
Avenue; on the west by South
Harbor Road, by land now or
formerly of Foster, by land now
or formerly of Montgomery, by
land now or formerly of
Fickeissen, and by land now or
formerly of Baker.
7:35 p.m. Preliminary ap-
proval for the major subdivision
for Briarcliff Acres at Southold,
in the Town of Southold, Coun-
ty of Suffolk and the State of
New York. Suffolk County Tax
Map Number. 1000-75-2-8 & 9.
The property is bordered on
the northwest by the Long
Island Rail Road; on the north-
east by land now or formerly of
Miresdizik and the Town of
Southold; on the southeast by
land now or formerly of John
Nierodzik by land now or
formerly of Tobin, by land now
or formerly of Roberta Hering,
by land now Or 'forff;efly of
Janet A. Davis, and by Main
Road (S.R. 25); and on the south
by Maple Avenue, by land now
or formerly of Barney Ovsiadik
& Jennie Ovsianik, by land now
or formerly of Thomas C. and
Jeanette Jerome, by land now or
formerly of James G. & Mary K.
Brewer, by land now or former-
ly of Brush, on the southwest by
land now or formerly of Tobin.
Any person desiring to be
heard on the above matter
should appear at the time and
place above specified.
Dated: June 15, 1992
BY ORDER OF THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
IX-6/18/92(54)
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
STATE OF NEW YORK
Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the
Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN,
a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County;
and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy,
has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watchman
once each week for ...................... ~ .... weeks
successively, commencing on the .......... ./,d7 .........
Sworn to before mc this ............ ./.o.. ..... day of
............ ....
Notary Public BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER
NOIARY PUBLIC, State 01 New York
No. 4806846
Qualified in Suffolk Cou.nty
Commission I~xpires ~/~i/~O.
SENDER:
SUBJECT:
SCTM#:
COMMENTS:
SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
:'~i - SOIJTHOLD TOWN
I, ' ': PLANNING BOARD
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
June 9, 1992
SCOTI' L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Rudolph H. Bruer
Edson and Bruer
P.O. Box 1466 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
RE:
Minor Subdivision for
George Stepnoski
SCTM# 1000-75-4-21 & 22
Dear Mr. Bruer:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town
Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 8, 1992.
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set
Monday, June 29, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. for a final public hearing on
the maps dated June 1, 1992.
Please contact this office if you have any questions
regarding the above.
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. / -~5
Chairman
IMPORTANT
File Number:
N1--473800--00836
tlse the abo~e nt~mber i:n all
T-o tt%e Lemd
The above informal:ion con.firms: tba.t filings on t:be describ-~d
N~..gative ~clam~i:o.n ~,~-me .o'ff:ici811y received .by,, and e~ter~d i:m t~
SEQR Reposi.to~y on: the date(s): shows in the box b~ded: (DATE RECEIVED
:above. !he date and time in t~ second line show ~he.n this
For comractions or questions CQB{aCt Ohar. le~ Eock;row, (518)457--222~.,
To~m .of $OIJTHOLD
Planning: B:oard~
53.095 :Main Road-P.O. Box 1179
$oufthold,. NY 11971
SEDR Repo~it o~y
NYSDEC ;DiMJ.$ion :of :Re.gulat:om¥ Affairs
A 1.b~ny, NY 1~2.5.3
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING 80ARD
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
February 25, 1992
SCOTF L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Rudolph Bruer
Edson and Bruer
Main Road P.O. Box 1466
Southold, New York 11971
RE: Minor subdivision for
George Stepnoski
SCTM#1000-75-4-21 & 22
Dear Mr. Bruer:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town
Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 24, 1992.
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board,
acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act,
established itself as lead agency on February 3, 1992, and as
lead agency makes a determination of non-significance, and
grants a Negative Declaration.
Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for
your records.
Encl.
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latharn, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 7654938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York ~1971
Fax (516) 765-1823
State Environmental Quality Review
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice of Determination Non-Significance
February 24, 1992
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the
implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State
Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law.
The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has
determined that the proposed action described below will not
have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Name of Action:
Proposed Minor Subdivision for
George Stepnoski
SCTMg: 1000-75-4-21 & 22
Location: Main Bayview and Baywater Avenue, Southold
SEQR Status : Type I (X)
Unlisted ( )
Negative Declaration: Yes ( )
No (X)
Description of Action:
This minor subdivision is for 2 lots on 21.044 acres
for the purpose of establishing a Fire District substation
on 3.466 acres on the southern end of the parcel at
Baywater Avenue and Main Bayview.
Page 2
George Stepnoski
SEQR Negative Declaration Con't.
Reason Supporting This Determination:
The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of
the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant
construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal
systems at the time of construction of the auxiliary fire
house. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil
conditions, and site details will be reviewed fully at the'
time of Suffolk County Department of Health Services
(SCDHS) application review. This impact is not considered
significant due to the anticipated project compliance with
established requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary
Code (SCSC) and the Suffolk County Department of Health
Services (SCDHS) and the required obtainment of relevant
permits.
Because there has been no correspondence received from the
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in
the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments
or objections from that agency.
Part III of the Environmental Assessment Form was
reviewed. It addresses in detail the environmental and
planning issues relevant to the subject application. The
site is predominantly farm land. Field inspection did not
reveal any significant natural environmental resources.
Goose Creek on the east side of Main Bayview Road lies to
the east of the subject property. The creek is not
expected to be impacted as a result of the proposed project
because the section of the land that is slated for the
construction of the auxiliary fire station is more than
300' from the creek. The Town Trustees also have reviewed
the project and have determined it is not within their
jurisdiction. The Town Trustees' jurisdiction extends
within 75' of all tidal wetlands and fresh water under the
Wetlands Code and 100' under the Coastal Erosion Management
Act. The applicant has stated in the Environmental
Assessment Form (EAF) that all storm water run off will be
contained by proper on-site drainage.
Page
The project represents a low intensity use involving a
potential 6,000 square foot building on 3.466 acre site,
with a coverage of only 4%. The site and area are zoned
for use by the Town of Southold, school districts, park
districts and fire districts, thus the proposed action is
consistent with zoning. A public hearing was held by the
Fire District on this project on December 10, 1991, and
there was no opposition to the project. The application
calls for a Fire District substation which could impact the
aesthetics and character of the site and area through
inappropriate architecture and/or incompatible site
design. However, the applicant has indicated that the
front side of the building will be faced with brick and the
site will be landscaped. A review of the proposed use of
the site indicates that the parking of emergency vehicles
and the vehicles of volunteers at the site will have a
minimal impact on overall traffic conditions. Clearly
during an emergency call there may be a sudden and
significant increase in the volume of traffic, but this
increase will be of a temporary nature and will occur
infrequently.
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner
Address: Planning Board
Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938
cc:
Robert DeLuca, Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Roger Evans, DEC Stony Brook
Thomas Jorling, DEC Albany
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Building Department
Board of Trustees
Applicant
Property Owner
TRUSTEES
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President
Henry P. Smith, Vice President
Albert I. Krupski, Jr.
John L. Bednoski, Jr.
John B. Tuthill
Telephone (516) 765-1892
Fax (516) 765-1823
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUPERVISOR
SCOTt L. HARRIS
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Planning Board
Board of Trustees,~..(~
Southold Fire District
SCTM #1000-75-4-21
February 24, 1992
The above referenced property was inspected on February 20th
and was found to be out of Trustees jurisdiction as submitted to
this office.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact this office.
cc: Bldg. Dept.
February 19, 1992
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr.,
Planning Board Office
Town of Southold
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Chairman
Re:
Minor Subdivision for George Stepnoski
Main Bayview and Baywater Avenue, Southold
SCTM#1000-75-4-21 & 22
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
In connection with the above matter, enclosed herewith please
find Full Environmental Assessment Form as revised.
Sincerely,
Enc.
' q 4-16-2 (2/87)-- 7c
617.21
Appendix A
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
SEQR
Purpose: The full I:AF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always*easy to answer. Frequent-
ly, there are aspects of a proiect that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of ~he broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part'l: Provides obiective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis thpt takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially*
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
,.. DETERMINATION ,OF sIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 []Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering bo~h the magitude and importance of each impaq:t, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
[] ~. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
[:] 6. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
[] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that ma
on the environment., therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
* A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of Action
~.-__ .~ . I~') ~/~.._ .. ~ _ blame of Lead Agency .
.Pri~b~ Ty~ Name of I ~onsible Off, er in I_ead Asency ~ Title of R~onsible Officer ~
gn -ure ~f ' - -- le O -'c~r in gency ~gn~u~Pr~ar~r[If different from responsible officer)
Date
T 1--PROJECT INFORM
' *- , Prepared by Project Sponsor ':
NOTICE: This document is d~signed to assist in determtning whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
on th~ environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered
as part of the application.for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
Southold F/re District. Bayview
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include S~reet Address, Munlclpalay and County}
Bayview Road and Baywater Avenue
NAME OF AP~ICANTISPONSOR
Fre_~d~ric~k. Weber. Secretary for Southnld Fire District
AOORESS
POBox_908, Main Road
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
tSlh ~ 765-3385
CITY/PO
Southold '"' ~ ..... STATE ZIP COOE
NY
NAME OF OWNER (U dlflerenl) I BUSINESS TELEPHONE
_ George Mt epnoski I t )
ADDRESS
Main Bayview Road
CiTY/PO " I STATE I ZIP CODE
, Southold NY 11971
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The purchase of four acres of vacant agriculture land for the eventual Construction
of a firehouse auxiliary building. Also to setoff the 3.466 ac~es from the 91.044.
Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and under,eloped areas..
1. Present land use: [3Urban l-Ilndustrial I-ICommercial [:]Residential (suburban)
i-IRural (non-farm)
[:]Forest I1aAgriculture E]Other
2. Total acreage of project area: 21. 044 acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE
Meadow or Orushland (Non-agricultural)
Forested
Agricultural (Includes orchards, c~ropland pasture, etc.)
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per ATtic!es 24, 25 of ECL)
Water Surface Area
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill)
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces
Other (Indicate type)
PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
N/A acres N/A acres
N/A acres N/A acres
21. 064 acres 3. 466 ' ' ' acres
N/A acres N/A acres
N/A acres N/A acres
N/A acres N/A acres
See survey acres See survey acres
N/A acres N/A acres
3. What is predominant soil typc~'s) on project site? Brown dirt
a. Soil drainage: I-'lWell drained % of site ~Moderately well dr,tined % of site
OPoorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS
[and C ass f cation System~ N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site~ OYes ~[]No ' . ~.
a. What is depth ~o bedrock? , (in feet)
' '
_ ~ppi'oximate percentage of proposed pro site with slopes: [~0-10% 010-15%.
[~*r5% or greater . %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? [~Yes [~o
~'7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes E3No
8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I~Yes ~No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? I~Yes J~No
11. Does project site contain any species qf plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
[~Yes [~No According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
0-1Yes I~No Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
I-lyes [~qo If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? I~Yes [~4qo
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area:
A
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name b. Size (In acres)
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~kYes r~No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [~¢es r-]No
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? E~Yes I~No
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? [3Yes J~]No
19. Is the site located in or substantially eo~t!;'_'ous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 J~¥es [:]No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [:]Yes ~No
B. Project Description
° 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor o~/-O~/~' acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: ~/ acres initially; c/ acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped ~)~ ~'fflOl~'¢~ acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed IM/~ %;
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~J/A,, ; proposed
Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour A//~ (upon completion of project)?
g.
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family
Initially
C Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ,~'~ ft.
Condominium
the site? , tons/cubic yar~Js.
2. How much natural m~l (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ['qYes ~]No ~N/A
a. If yes, for what intend~ purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I--lYes I-INo
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? r~Yes
E3No
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers} will be removed from site? ~///af acres.
$. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by th s project~
I-lyes ~[~].N o
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction U,,~ ~tloLDr3 months, {including demolition).
7. If multi-phased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I ~ month
c. Approximate completion date of final phase ~/)~q ~rla~i/gmonth
d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I~Yes
8. Will blasting occur during construction? I-lYes J~'No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction U/lC
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project /~/0 ~ ~-
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
~No
year, (including demolition).
year.
; after project is complete
[~Yes [~o If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes E~o
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes ~]No Type
14. Will surfacearea of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?
Explain ,~J! ,/~
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain! E3Yes
16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~]Yes I~No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month f~iqi aq~-~ tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid w~s. te f.acility be used? E3Yes
c. If yes, give name ~Jt~, ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
e. If Yes, explain ~./~
E3Yes [~No
I~No
I-lyes '~No
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? [~Yes
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal?
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I-lYes [~No
~No
tons/month.
19. Will
20. Will
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? I-lYes ~No
If yes , indicate type(s}
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity
23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day.
24. Does
If
project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~Yes E~LNo
project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise evels~ E]Yes
gallons/minute.
project involve Local, State or Federal fu,nding? I~Yes [3No
Ye,, explain L0t J CT,,
~ohocn
C
25! Approvals Required:
City, Town, Village Board I-lYes /]No
City, Town, Village Planning Board l~Yes E3No
City, Town Zoning Board [Yes [~No
City, County Health Department [~LYes I~No
Other Local Agencies ~lYes [~No
Other Regional Agencies [~Yes [~No
State Agencies I-lYes ~]No
Federal Agencies I-lYes [~,No
Type
C. Zoning and Planning Information'
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ,~kYes I~No
· If Yes, indicate decision required:
E]zoning amendment []zoning variance ~lspecial use permit [~,subdivision [site plan
[]new/revision of master plan E]resource management plan [other
3. What is the maxir~um potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
Submittal
Date
Al
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site?
5. What is the maximum potential development of the ~iite if c)ev~loped as permitted by the proposed zoning?
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? )~Yes r~No
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a V~ mile radius of proposed action?
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? t~LYes I~No
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed?
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~, L/(/~ ~
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I~Yes
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? r'3Yes [~o
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? I-Wes DNo
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [Yes ~1o
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [Yes rqNo
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, ptease discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
^pplicant/Sponsor Name Date
Signature Title
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
P~--PROJECT IMPACTS AND TOIR MAGNITUDE ,~
Responsibility of Lead Agency
General Information (Read Carefully)
· In completing the form the reviewer should he guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
· Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
· The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
· The impacts of each project, on each site, in each I,ocality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
· The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
· In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will he any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column q or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. tf impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This
must be explained in Part 3.
IMPACT ON LAND
I. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?
~]NO []YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
· Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than
3 feet.
· Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles.
· Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within
3 feet of existing ground surface.
· Construction that will c~ntinue for more than 1 year or involve more
than one phase or stage.
· Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000
tons of natural material Ci.e.; rock or soil) per year.
· Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfiU.
· Construction in a designated floodway.
· Other impacts
2. Will there be an effect ti....,y umque or unusual land forms found on
the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)[:~l~O []YES
· Specific land forms:
6
I 2 I 3
Small to Potential[' Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] [=]Yes I--INo
[] [] ~lYes I--]No
L~ [] ~Yes [-INo
[] [] []Yes []No
[] ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
t'
IMPACT ON WATER
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected?
(Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
~'N O EWES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Developable area of site contains a protected water body.
· Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a
protected stream.
· Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body.
· Construction in a designated freshwate.r or tidal wetland. .
· Other impacts: ~f~'~l~l{ f'~t~cC-/~,¢g-O~Sf//~cJ~
4. Will proposed ~ ~ny non-protected existing or new body
of water? ~.N O E]YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
· Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
· Other impacts:
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? 12~.NO I~YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will require a discharge permit.
· Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
· Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45
gallons per minute pumping capacity.
· Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water
supply system.
· Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater.
· Liquid effluent will be convey~-d off the site to facilities which presently
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
· Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per
day.
· Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an
existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
· Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
· Proposed Action will allow residential uses in' areas without water
and/or sewer services.
· Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
· Other impacts:
C, 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patter~, or surface
water runoff? ~J~O I~YES
Esamples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would change flood water flows.
?
I '~' 2 3
Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] []Yes I~No
[] [] []Yes f-INo
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] E~Yes []No
[] [] ~Yes []No
[] [] []Yes ~]No
[] [] I~lyes I~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
· Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
· Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns.
· Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ~[~NO [-1YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given
hour.
· Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of
refuse per hour.
· Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed
to industrial use.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial
development within existing industrial areas.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8. Wi(( Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? ~,NO I-lYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site.
· Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat.
· Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other
than for agricultural purposes.
· Other impacts:
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? ~[['40 ~IYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
· Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?
¥~'qO r~YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· The proposed act on would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
8
Small to Potentia Can Impact Be
Moderate Large 'Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] I-lYes [--INo
[] [] I-lyes F-1No
[] [] I--lYes I--1No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes ['-]No
[] [] ~lyes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] I--lYes []No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
'" Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of
agricultural land.
· The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land
· The proposed action would disruptor prevent installation of agricultural
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip ~cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~;].NO []YI~S
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
· Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
· Project components that will result in the elimination or significant
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? r-INO I~YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
· Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the
project site.
· Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities?
Examples that would apply to column 2 il]NO E]YES
C · The foreclosure of future recreational
permanent
opportunity.
· A major reduction of an open space important to the community.
· Other impacts:
9
I "' 2 3
Small to" Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] []Yes r-~No
[] [] I--lyes J-]No
[] [] I-lyes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes I--]No
[] [] ~lYes []No
[] [] l-lYes []No
[] [] I--lyes I-1No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] E]Yes []No
[] '[] []Yes L-]No
[] [] []Yes r-INo
[] [] []Yes E]No
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems?
~NO ~iYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods.
· Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON ENERGY
1.5. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply? ~g, NO I~YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of
any form of energy in the municipality.
· Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
· Other impacts:
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result
of the Proposed Action? - I~,NO ~IyES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility.
· Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day).
· Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
· Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
~;[~O E3YES
Examples that would appty to column 2
· Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge or emission.
· Proposed Action may result'in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
· Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural
gas or other flammable liquids.
· Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance
within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste.
· Other impactsi
10
I 2
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] [-]Yes [-]No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] I-]Yes [:]No
[] [] []Yes r-lNo
[] [] []Yes E]No
[] [] EE]Yes [DNo
[] [] i--lyes E]No
[] [] I-lYes [:]No
[] [] I-lYes E]No
[] [] [-]Yes I~No
[] [] ~Yes E:]No
[] [] []Yes I-1No
[] [] E]Yes E]No
[] [] []Yes E]No
[] [] []Yes []NO
[] [] E]Yes E]No
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD
18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community?
~INO [~YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
' The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
· The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project.
· Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals.
· Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use.
· Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures
or areas of historic importance to the community.
· Development will create a demand for additianal cammunity services
{e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
· Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects.
· Proposed Action will create or eliminate emplayment.
· Other impacts:
I '' 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] r~Yes r~No
[] [] []Yes ['~No
[] [] r~Yes [-]No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] E-]Yes ]--]No
[] [] []Yes [-]No
[] ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
~patenti~l adverse envi4on.mental impacts,' ~2NO C]YES .
~ ~ ~ "",r~-'~ Zo' ~q~ ~
If Any Abtion in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large'impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
C
Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of Lead A§ency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more imPact(s) is considered to be potentially lar§e, even if the impact(s) may be
mitlgaled.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1. Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
· The probability of the impact occurring
· The duration of thd impact
· Its irreversibility, including permanently ~ost resources of value
· Whether the impact can or will be controlled
· The regional consequence of the impact
· Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
· Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
11
617.21
Appendix B
State Environmental Quality Review
V sua! EAF Addendum
SEQR
C
This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of
the Full EAF.
(To be comp!eted by Lead Agency)
Distance Between
Visibility
1. Would the project be visible from:
· A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available
to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation
of natural or man-made scenic qualities?
· An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public
observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural
or man-made scenic qualities?
· A site or structure listed on the National or State
Registers of Historic Places?
· State Parks?
· The State Forest Preserve?
· National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges?
· National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding
natural features?
Project and Resource (in Miles)
0-V4 IA-l/2 I/2-3 3-5 5+
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
"National Park Service lands?
· Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic
or Recreational?
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
· Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such
as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak?
· A governmentally established or designated interstate
or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for
establishment or designation?
· A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as
scenic?
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] 0 []
[] [] [] [] []
· Municipal park, or designated open space?
· County road?
· State?
· Local road?
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] 0 []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] 0 []
Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other
seasons)
[]Yes E~No
Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year
during which the project will be visible?
[~Yes ~]No
DESCRIPTION O~I~xISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT
4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally ~describe the
environment.
surrounding
Within
· 1/4 mile '1 mile
Essentially undeveloped [] []
Forested [] []
Agricultural [] []
Suburban residential [] []
Industrial [] []
Commercial [] []
Urban [] []
River, Lake, Pond [] []
Cliffs, Overlooks [] []
Designated Open Space [] []
Flat [] []
Hilly [] []
Mountainous [] []
Other [] []
NOTE: add attachments as needed
Are there visually similar projects within:
'1/2 mile []Yes F-lNo
*1 miles []Yes []No
*2 miles []Yes I-]No
*3 miles []Yes []No
* Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate
EXPOSURE
6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is
NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate.
CONTEXT
7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is
FREQUENCY
Holidays/
Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally
Travel to and from work [] [] [] []
Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] []
Routine travel by residents [] [] [] []
At a residence [] [] [] []
At worksite [] [] [] []
Other [] [] [] []
2
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Frederick R. Weber, Secretary
Southold Fire District
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
SCOTt L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Dear Mr. Weber: ~/~--- ~ /),~ _ /~,
, Enclosed.please ~nc~(2)/flur~eys for
Please notify his office as to whether any firewells are
needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells
will be needed.
bY~_~_. 1~/ , 199~_Thank you for your
Please
reply
cooperation.
enc.
truly yours, / ~ ~
cB~an~remtatnOr lowski, Jr. ~
TRUSTEES
John M. Bredemeyer, HI, President
Hemy P. Smith, Vice President
Albert J. Krupski, Jr.
John L. Bednosld, Jr.
John B. Tuthill
Telephone (516) 765-1892
Fax (516) 765-1823
BOARD OFTOWNTRUSTEES
TOWN OFSOUTHOLD
SUPER¥ISOR
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Planning Board
Board of Trustees~./~
Southold Fire Dis~'r~t
SCTM 81000-75-4-21
February 24, 1992
The above referenced property was inspected on February 20th
and was found to be out of Trustees jurisdiction as submitted to
this office.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact this office.
cc: Bldg. Dept.
ULI L!
February 19, 1992
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
Planning Board Office
Town of Southold
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
Minor Subdivision for George Stepnoski
Main Bayview and Baywater Avenue, Southold
SCTM#1000-75-4-21 & 22
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
In connection with the above matter, enclosed herewith please
find Full Environmental Assessment Form as revised.
Sincerely,
'~d~o 1 '~ ~h/~.~B r~ e r~J
ol'
RHB/cam '
Enc.
, 'i4:';'6-~ (2/87]--7c
617.21
Appendix A '
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
SEQR
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always 'easy to answer. Frequent-
ly, there am aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a proiect or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a proiect or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is id(;ntified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
,. DETERMINATION ,OF sIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 DPart 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering bo~h [he magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
I-I ~. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be p?epared.*
[] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that ma '
on the environment,, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
* A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
L ," ....
Name of Action
/fl,L~ ~.~,q 'q/~l ~x, Name of Lead Agency
c~ ~ ~[, ~~o~.~] · ' ./~ .
Print or Type Name of Re~onsible Officer in Lead Agency TiLle qf R~ponsible Officer ~
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Asency Sign ~f Preparer ( f different from responsible officer}
Date
PART 1--PROJECT INFORM N
.. :~i Prepared by Project Sponsor ' '
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determming whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
on the environment· Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered
as part of the application.for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
NAME OF ACTION
Southold Fire District, Bayview
LOCATION OR ACTION (Include SireD! Address, Munlclpallly and County)
Bayview Road and Baywater Avenue
NAMEOFAPPLICANTISPONSOR
Fred~ric__k. Weber, Secre:ary for Southold Fire District
AOORESS
POBox. 908.
CITY/PO
Main Road
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
t516 t 765-3385
I
Southold . ,,...~J.> ..... J STATE ZIP CODE
NY t1971
NAME OF OWNER (If different) J 8USINE~ TELEPHONE
George Stepnoski (
ADDRESS
Main Bayview Road
CITY/PO
C I STATE I ZIP COOE
Southold NY 11971
The purchase of four acres of vacant agriculture land for the eventual Construction
of a firehouse auxiliary building. Also to setoff ~he 3.466 ac~es from the 21.044.-
Please Complele Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of Overall project, both developed and under.eloped areas. ·
1. Present land use: I-IUrban I-Ilndustri~l C]Commercial E]Residential (suburban)
[:]Rural (non-farm)
C]Forest [3]Agriculture nOther
2. Total acreage of project area: 21.044
acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural)
Forested
Agricultural (Includes orchards, c~ropland, pasture, etc.)
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Attic!es 24, 25 of ECL)
Water Surface Area
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill)
Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces
Other (Indicate type)__
PRESENTLY
N/A acres
N/A
acres
21.044 acres
N/A acres
N/A acres
N/A acres
See survey acres
N/A acres
AFTER COMPLETION
N/A acres
N/A acres
_ 3.466 acres
N/A
N/A acres
N/A acres
See surve}' acres
N/A acres
3. What is predominant soil type's) on project site.~ Brown dirt
a. Soil drainage: I-IWell drained _ % of ~ite l~lModerately well drained % of site
[:]Poorly drained . % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS
Land Classification Systemt N/A acres. (See I NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site~ ayes It]No ' . ..
a. What is depth Zo bedrock? _ (in feet)
;' '.15: Approximate percenta ,project site with slopes: [~0-10% 1~10-15% %
[~1'5% or greater , %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? DYes I~[No
~'7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ~]Yes DNo
8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [:]Yes ~No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ~lYes J~No
11. Does project site contain any species qf plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
~lYes I~;~,N o According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e,, cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
[]Yes I~lo Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
[~No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes ~'No
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: ~)j
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16.
17.
Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name
Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~lkYes [:]No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection?
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection?
b. Size (In acres)
[~es ~INo
~lYes ~lNo
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? I-lyes ~]No
19. Is the site located in or suostantially eon~'_'ous to a Criticat Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~'es ~lNo
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~lYes ~No
C
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a, Total contiguous acreage owned or controIl~d by project sponsor ,.~/. O~'L/'
b. Project acreage to be developed: L/ acres initially; ~/-/'
c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped {J~ ~Yl0~ dl acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: ' (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed /~/,/-I %;
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing AJ/,~ ; proposed
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour /t//~z} (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Eamily Two Family Multiple Family
Initially /~1 ,~-
Ultimately r~// ~1
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure __ height; width;
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will o(~cupy is?
acres ultimately.
Condominium
length.
ft.
3
site~ , ,~ __ tons/cubic '/ar'ds. ,
2. How much natural materi~ ~., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed fror
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? I~Yes E]No {;~]N/A
a. If yes, for what intend~ purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~]Yes r~No
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? E3Yes E3No
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? .. {".//,~ acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by th s project?
I-lyes ~[~.N o
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 0~q ~B01Pr~ months, (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 ~ month
c. Approximate completion date of final phase /¢'~,/~ ~-~ld(W~month
d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? E]Yes
8. Will blasting occur during construction? E]Yes [~No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 0/lC
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project /g/0 i'q t~
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
nNo
year, (including demolition).
year.
; after project is complete
i-lYes []~-No If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? l~Yes CINo Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?
Explain ,A)I ,~
1S. Is project or ~]n~ portion of project located in a 100 year flood ph~in! ~lyes
16. Will the project generate solid waste? q~]Yes E3No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month t'~iqirfl&I tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid W~s~e facility be used? i-lYes I~qo
c. If yes, give name ,./~J/~t ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
e. If Yes, explain ~')
I~Yes [~No
[~No
E]Yes
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~Yes ~No
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? --Y~ tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? . I-lYes ~No
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? r-lyes
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels?
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? I-lYes [~No
If yes , indicate type(s)
I~Yes
EU, No ~oh~rn
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity - [)//~, gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal fupding? []Yes
If Yes, explain _ Lo(~.l
4
· ,2~. A,pprovals Required:
City, Town, Village Board I-lYes []No
City, Town, Village Planning Board l~3Yes I-INo
City, Town Zoning Board [~Yes [~No
City, County Health Department [~LYes ~lNo
Other Local Agencies ~lYes [~No
Other Regional Agencies C1Yes E~No
State Agencies ~lYes ~No
Federal Agencies ~lYes [~No
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~,Yes I~No
· If Yes, indicate decision required:
I-Izoning amendment Dzoning variance ~lspecial use permit [~,subdivision I-Isite plan
E~new/revision of master plan F-lresource management plan E~]other
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site?
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
Submittal
Date
A
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? /~r-~ C /
5. What is the maximum potential developm, ent of the site if cJev?~_oped as permitted by the proposed zoning?
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ,,E3Yes I']No
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action?
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? ~,Yes E3No
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed?
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~, /'~(~ ~
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? E]Yes
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? [~Yes [~No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? I-lYes E3No
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? r-lYes
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? E]Yes I-INo
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project· If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge·
Applicant/Sponsor Name Date
Signature Title
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
wilh this assessment.
Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND ~HEIR_MAGNITUDE
Responsibility of Lead Agency 0 " ' '
General Information (Read Carefully) ' ,,
· In completing the form the reviewer should he guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
· Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
· The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
· The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
· The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
· In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the '19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column '1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the proiect to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This
must be explained in Part 3.
IMPACT ON LAND
I. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?
~]NO E3YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
· Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than
3 feet.
· Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles.
· Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within
3 feet of existing ground surface.
· Construction that wilJ c~ntinue for more than 1 year or involve more
than one phase or stage.
· Excavation for mining purposes t}~at would remove more than 1,000
tons of natural material (i.e.; rock or soil) per year.
· Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfiJl.
· Construction in a designated floodway.
· Other impacts
2. Will there be an effect t:. _..~y u~que or unusual land forms found on
the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)~JO I~YES
· Specific land forms:
6
I 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] I-lYes [-]No
[] [] I-lYes [~No
L-1 [] [-]Yes I'--I No
[] [] I-lyes [-]No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes ~-INo
[] [] [~]Yes I-qNo
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] l~]Yes [~No
[] [] I--lYes []No
IMPACT ON WATER
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected?
(Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
~]'No []YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Developable area of site contains a protected water body.
· Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a
protected stream.
· Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body.
· Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland.
4. Wi p~oposed action a~ect any non-protected existing or new body
of water? ~NO ~YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· A 10% increase or dec~ease in the surface area of any body of water
· Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
· Other impacts:
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? ~Z.NO E:]YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will require a discharge permit.
· Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
· Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45
gallons per minute pumping capacity.
· Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water
supply system.
· Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater.
· Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
· Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per
day.
· Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an
existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
· Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
· Proposed Action will allow residential uses in' areas without water
and/or sewer services.
· Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
· Other impacts:
C. 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patter~, or surfac~
water runoff? ~t~O E-WES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would change flood water flows.
7
~ 2 3
Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] []Yes f-lNo
[] [] I~Ves I-'~ No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] [~Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes r-lNo
[] [] I-lYes []No
[] [] []Yes I--INo
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] I-lYes []No
[] [] E3¥es []No
[] [] []Yes I--INo
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] I-lyes []No
[] [] [~Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] E]¥es []No
[] [] []Yes []No
· Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
· Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns.
· Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ~I~NO E3YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given
hour.
· Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of
refuse per hour.
· Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a
heat source producing more than '10 million BTU's per hour.
· Proposed action witl allow an increase in the amount of land committed
to industrial use.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial
development within existing industrial areas.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? ~].NO I-lYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site.
· Removal of anv portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat.
· Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other
than for agricultural purposes.
· Other impacts:
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? ~0 r-lYEs
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
· Proposed Action requires the removal of 'more than 10 acres
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?
~NO E]YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
~ 2 - 3';
II to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] []Yes E~No
[] [] [-~Yes i--~No
[] [] []Yes i--]No
[] [] I-lyes []No
[] [] I-lYes []No
[] ~ ~Xes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Ves
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
· Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of
agricultural land.
· The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land
· The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~;;~NO I-lYES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed ]and uses, or project components obviously different from
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
· Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
· Project components that will result in the elimination or significant
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance~ ~]NO []YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
· Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the
project site.
· Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities~
Examples that would apply to column 2 J~NO [YES
C permanent foreclosure of a recreational opportunity.
The
future
· A major reduction of an open space important to the community.
· Other impacts:
9
Small to. Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] ~]Yes r-lNo
[] [] I'-~ Yes I-]No
[] [] I-lYes I--INo
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] ['-lYes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] ¥-1 []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes
[] [] []Yes []No
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems?
~]NO r-lyES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods.
· Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems·
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Witl proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply? [~NO I-iYE S
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of
any form of energy in the municipality.
· Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
· Other impacts:
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result
of the Proposed Action? ~ I~,NO ~1y£5
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility.
· Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day).
· Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
· Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
I~O r-lyES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.} in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level
discharge or emission.
· Proposed Action may result'in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
· Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural
gas or other flammable liquids.
· Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance
within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or haxardous
waste.
· Other impactsi
10
~ I 2 ,3 ' '
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change,
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] I-lyes []No
[] [] []Yes
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] fiYes fi]No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] i--lYes []No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~o
D ~ ~Ye~ ~No
~ ~ ~Yes
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes
~ ~ ~Ye~ ~No
·' : ~ GROW'~NDT~A
IMPACT ON CHARACTER
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD
18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community?
I-]NO l-lYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
· The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this proiect.
· Proposed ~ction will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals.
· Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use.
· Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures
or areas of historic importance to the community.
· Development will create a demand for additional community services
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
· Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects.
· Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment.
· Other impacts:
Small to' Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes [--]No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] I--lyes I--1No
[] [] J~]Yes [~]No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] E]Yes []No
[] [] []Yes E~]No
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
CU~.~po-tenti~al adverse envk~on~nental impacts? ..~0 L-lYES ,
If Any Abtion in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more imPact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be
mitigaled.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1. Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3. Based on tile information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
· The probability of the impact occun:ing
· The duration of thd impact
· Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
· Whether the impact can or will be controlled
· The regional consequence of the impact
· Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
· Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
11
617.21
Appendix B
State Environmental Quality Flevie v
Visual EAF Addendum
SEQR
C
This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 1 1 of Part 2 of
the Full EAF.
(To be comp!eted by Lead Agency)
Distance Between
Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles)
1. Would the project be visible from: 0-V4 V4-V2 1/2-3 3-5 5 +
· A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available [] [] [] [] []
to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation
of natural or man-made scenic qualities?
· An pverlook or parcel of land dedicated to public [] [] [] [] []
observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural
or man-made scenic qualities?
· A site or structure listed on the National or State [] [] [] [] []
Registers of Historic Places?
· State Parks? [] [] [] [] []
· The State Forest Preserve? [] [] [] [] []
· National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? [] [] [] [] []
· National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding [] [] [] [] []
natural features?
· National Park Service lands? [] [] [] [] []
· Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic [] [] [] [] []
or Recreational?
· Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such [] [] [] [] []
as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak?
· A governmentally established or designated interstate [] [] [] [] []
or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for
establishment or designation?
· A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as [] [] [] [] []
scenic?
· Municipal park, or designated open space? [] [] [] [] []
· County road? [] [] [] [] []
· State? [] [] [] [] []
· Local road? [] [] [] [] []
2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other
seasons)
[]Yes I~No
:3. Are any of the resources checked in question ] used by the public during the time of year
during which the project will be visible?
[]Yes ~]No
DESCRIPTION OF ~ VISUAL ENVIRONMENT
4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally ~lescribe the
environment.
surrounding
Within
'1/4 mile * 1 mile
Essentially undeveloped [] []
Forested [] []
Agricultural [] []
Suburban residential [] []
Industrial [] []
Commercial [] []
Urban [] []
River, Lake, Pond [] []
Cliffs, Overlooks [] []
Designated Open Space [] []
Flat [] []
Hilly [] []
Mountainous [] []
Other [] []
NOTE: add attachments as needed
5. Are there visually similar projects within:
*1/2 mile []Yes [~No
'1 miles []Yes []No
*2 miles []Yes []No
*3 miles []Yes []No
* Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate
EXPOSURE
6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is
NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate.
CONTEXT
7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is
Activity
Travel to and from work
Involved in recreational activities
Routine travel by residents
At a residence
At worksite
Other
FREQUENCY
Holidays/
Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally
[] [] [] []
[] [] [] []
[] [] [] []
2
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr,
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Frederick R. Weber, Secretary
Southold Fire District
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
SCOTt L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Dear Mr. Weber:
, En~lo%ed please~ln~(~uT~ for' ¢//~/~~//"
lease not~fy th~s office as to whether any firewells are
needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells
will be needed.
by~.. ]~/ , 199~Thank you for your
Please
reply
cooperation.
enc.
truly yours,
February 3, 1992
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., chairman
Planning Board Office
Town of Southold
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Southold Fire District at Bayview
SCTM#1000-75-4-p/o22
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
The above matter is appearing on your agenda this evening.
was my intention to attend, however, a personal friend and
business acquaintance, Monroe Fink of Glen Cove, New York,
passed away over the weekend. I am attending his wake and
funeral. Please excuse my nonappearance.
It
If you need me for anything, please let me know. I will be
available to attend any future meetings that you may have. I
have spoken with your office and it was in their opinion that
my attendance would not be required for tonight's meeting.
Thank you for your understanding in this matter.
Again, if you should need anything, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sing~y~~
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTF L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
February 4, 1992
Rudolph H. Bruer
Edson & Bruer
P.O. Box 1466 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
RE: Minor Subdivision for
George Stepnoski
Main Bayview and Baywater
Avenue, Southold
SCTM#1000-75-4-21 & 22
Dear Mr. Bruer:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town
Planning. Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 3, 1992.
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board,
acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act,
establishes itself as Lead Agency.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Board will wait
for a second report from the Suffolk County Department of Health
Services as requested by the Health Department in their
correspondence dated January 10, 1992.
Bennett Orlowski, Jr./
Chairman
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516)765-t938
SCOTF L. HARRIS
Supervisor
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
197
RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request
Dear Reviewer:
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8
(State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental
Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following:
1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below;'
2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead
agency; and
3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.
Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed
Environmental Assessment Form~AF?)o assisVou
Project Name:we/ . ~_'_~,~.-j~ F/~/P~Z~-L
SEQ~ Classifica~ ~~f -f~
~ ( ) Un-listed
Contact Person: ~ ~r ~. ~~& -
(516)-765-1938
The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental
impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of
the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you
have an interest in being lead agency.
Planning Board Position:
(~) This a~ency wishes to jfss~mefllea~qency status for this action~z/3~
~ ; ag nc!~ nas no objection to your agency assuming lead agency
status for this action.
( ) Other. ( See comments below).
Sincerely
Bennett Orlowski
Chairman
cc: ~
~Board of Trustees v
~ilding'D~-a-~tment --
S~~y Dep~--~--He=~th S~zvi'ces
~ NYSDEC - Stony Brook ~
~SD~ A~bany
~,~. D~t~Pu~-i~c-~orks
U.S. Army ~o~f En~r~
~ Tram~ert~on
* Maps are enclosed for your, yeview
Coordinating agencies
Appendix C ·
State Environmental Quality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor)
SEQR
1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME
Southold ;Fire Distr'[ct Bayview purchase
3. PROJECT LOCATION:
MuniciDagty Southold County Suffolk
4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc.. or provide map)
East by Main Bayview Road; South by Freeman's Lane a/k/a Baywater Avenue
SCTMf~1000-075.00-04.00-p/o 022. 000
5. I$ PROPOSED ACTION:
~[New [] Expansion [] Modificationlalteratlon
6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
The purchase of four acres of vacant agriculture land for the eventual construction
of firehouse auxiliary building.
7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED:
,.iil.,ly ac.es ul,imate,y $.¥¢.f. ac.es
8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS?
[] Yes [] No I! No, describe brieBy
go WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT?
[] Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial [] AgricuRure [] Park/Forest/Open space [] Other
10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PER~IT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMAFELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL.
STATE OR LOCAL)?
[~Yes [] No If yes, list agency(s) and pe~mR/approvals
Southold Town Planning Board - permission to divided property into two parcels,
consisting of~,f~acres and~ acres
~ Yes [] No If y,~'J, lisl agency name and permillapproval
12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION?
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete th. ,,,
Coastal Assessment Form before OVER proceeding with this~, asse~,,~11~ ~n~ ~ ~ ~] ~ ~ I ~'
.(._
PART II--ENVIRON/V, -F.~ASSESSMENT (To be COmpleted by Agent,?
A. DOES ACTION EXCEED A,~ ~-{ IRESHOLD IN 6 ' /" '
[] Yes [~[No f -- , NYCRR, PART 617.127 If ~es, coo~. ,~te the rewew process and use the EULL EAF.
S. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67
may be superseded by another inyolved agency. It NO, a negative declaratio~
[] ~es [] No
C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANy ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WiTH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, If legible)
Cl. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, soUd waste production or glsbOSal
potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly:
C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, hfstoric, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain bdefl~
C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wild6fe species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly:
C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially a6opted, or a change in use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain bdefl,
C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likety to be induced by the proposed action? Explain brielly.
C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effecfs not identified in C1-C57 Explain brielly.
C?. OIher impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly.
D, IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS~
[] Yes [] No If Yes, explain briefly '
PART III--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE ('To be completed by Agency)
INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant.
Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d)
Irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that
explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed.
[] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY--
occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration.
Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting
documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts
AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination:
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Frederick R. Weber, Secretary
Southold Fire District
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
SCO'I~F L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Dear Mr. Weber: ~/~ ~ ~
· Enc~losed please findS(2)/~urveys for ~/~/~~
Please notify his office as to whether any firewells are
needed. Please specify whether
will be needed.
Please reply by.~.~/~/
cooperation.
shallow wells or electric wells
, 199~Thank you for your
enc.
Benn.~~~ytruly yours, /
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
Suffolk County Planning Commision
H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building -
Veterans Memorial Highway
Hauppauge, New York 11788
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
12th Floor
Fax (516) 765-1823
Attention:
Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner
Subdivision Review Division
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the
Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed
subdivision ~o the/S~f~olk.Coun~y Planning Commission: -/~
Map of- .,,~'.,~., ,~~ Hamlet/Locality
S.C.D.P.W. Topo ~o.. _ Zoning~~._./~~ _/~-~
S.C. Tax Map No.. ~ - -4/
Major Sub. Mino~ Sub. L---"Site Plan Cluster
MATERIAL SUBMITTED:
Preliminary Plat (3 copies) R~oad Profiles
Drainage Plans (1) Topogroaphical Map (1) __
Site Plan (1) Grading Plan (1) __
(1)
Other materials (specify and give number of copies)
Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet
CONTINUED
REFERRAL CRITERIA:
SEQRA STATUS:
1. The project is an (Unlisted) Type II)Action.
2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration)
(Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by
the Planning Board.
3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes) (No).
The proposed division has received approval from the
S.C. Dept of Health. (Yes) (No).
Comments:
We request acknowledgement of
receipt of this referral (Yes)
(No)
Referral received 19
by Suffolk County Planning Commiss~-~n
and assigned File NO.
Very truly you,rs, t~ // '~
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~
Chairman
December 13, 1991
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
Southold Fire District
Bayview, Southold, New York
SCTM#1000-075.00-04.00-p/o022.000
Dear Sirs:
The following statements are offered for your consideration
the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its
referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission:
1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a
firehouse auxiliary building is proposed.
2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made
the grades of the existing road.
3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing
structures are proposed.
in
in
SOUTHOLO IqWN
~.NNING BOARD
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Oflowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTt L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York I 1971
Fax (516) 765~1823
RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request
Dear Reviewer:
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8
(State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental
Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following:
1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below;
2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead
agency; and
3. Issues of Concern which you believe should be evaluated.
Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed
Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you ~,n your response.
Requested Action:
w.~- '~ ~%. ~ .... ' ' ' ' ·
( ) Unlisted
Contact Person:
(5]'G) -765-1938
The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental
impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of
the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you
have an interest in being lead agency.
Planning Board Position:
(~ This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency
status for this action.
( ) Other. ( See comments belo.~).
Comments-
CC:
Sincerely,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
oAppea s
Bo~fT~-ust~es
~i-l~~r--~nt
Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services
~ony-Brook
~Ef~%D~C~---A-l-bany
$~c~--B~tr-'of--Pubtic-Works
NU..7 S: A~-my--C~ r _p~of--~~
~N Y~L~Dopt-~ortation
* Maps are enclosed for your°review
Coordinating agencies
DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH SERVICES
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
Robert d. Gaffney
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
?
Mary E. Hibberd, MD, MPH
CO~4MI$$1ONER
January 10, lP92
Robert G. Kasner, Planner
Southold Town Planning Board Office
Southold Town Hall
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
RE: Stepnoski Minor Subdivision
SCTM#: 1000-75-4-22
Dear Mr. Kasner:
The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received your letter dated
December 24, 1992 concerning the above-referenced project and has no objection to the Town's
designation as lead agency.
Based on our review, we submit the following comments.
I. SUFFOLK COUNTY SANITARY CODE ($CSC)
No Record of Article 6 Aoolication:
Our agency has no record of an active application for subdivision approval as required by Article 6
of the $C$C. Absent a formal application, it is impossible to make a f'mal determination regarding
the proposed action's conformance with the density requirements of Article 6. Article 6 requires a
minimum lot yield of 20,000 sq ft per lot in Hydrogeologic Zone IV. Equivalent lot yield refers to
gross land area minus the area of roads, recharge basins, and other improvements which may be
necessmy to the development of the site.
We are also unable to provide technical compliance comments on this proposal without an
application. We recommend, therefore, that the project sponsor submit an application to our agency
at the earliest possible date so a complete technical review may be undertaken.
COUNTY CENTER
RIVERHEAD, N.Y. I 1901-3397
Letter to Robert G. Kasn~l~
January 10, 1992
Page 2
~licle 6 Subdivision Density:
Based on the limited information provided, it appears that the proposed action can conform to the
subdivision density requirements for conventional subsurface sewage disposal systems.
SCDHS Compliance Requirements and Jurisdiction:
The applicant must comply with the requirements of the SCSC and all relevant construction
standards for water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specifications, subsurface
soil conditions, and site plan details are essential to complete review of this project. These
considerations are reviewed fully at the time of SCDHS application review.
SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the f'mal location of sewage disposal and water supply systems.
The applicant, therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system without Health
Department approval.
H. NATURAL RESOURCES
Environmental Assessment Form (EAF):
Please be advised that an EAF was not provided with the material sent to our agency. Absent
additional information, it is difficult for our agency to make its most well informed opinion
regarding the potential significance of this action.
Based only on the subdivision map, it does not appear that the proposed action will have a
significant environmental effect. Nonetheless, we wish to reserve the right to submit further
comments when additional information about this proposal can be determined.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. If you have any questions, please feel free
to contact the Offioe of Ecology at 852-2078.
CC:
Louise Harrison
Stephen Costa, P.E.
Sincerely,
Robert S. DeLuca
Sr. Environmental Analyst
Office of Ecology
SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
SENDER:
SUBJECT:
SCTMg:
COMMENTS:
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
ScoTr L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request
Dear Reviewer:
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8
(State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental
Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following:
1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below;
2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead
agency; and
3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.
Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed
Environmental Assessment Form (EAF)~o ~sy.t yo~u in Ir~ur response.
Project Name:
Requested Action:/~ .... ~J~ ~ ~), ~,~ ~
SEQ~ Classification: (X) T e I
( ) U~isted
Contact Person: .3~ ~~ . (516) -765'1938
The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental
impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of
the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you
have an interest in being lead agency.
Planning Board Position:
(~) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency
status for this action.
( ) Other. ( See comments below).
Comments:
Please feel free to contact this office for further information.
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
cc: Re,rd ~
Rn~ ef Trustees ~
~Building'Department
$outhold Town Board
5~Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services
NYSDEC - Albany
P-=-. cf ~"~: Works
U~S~-Army uorp of Enginee~
* Maps are enclosed for your_review
Coordinating agencies
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Ri~:hard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTI' L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
December 24, 1991
Rudolph H. Bruer
Edson and Bruer
Attorneys at Law
Main Road, P.O. Box 1466
Southold, NY 11971
RE: Minor Subdivision for
Southold Fire District,
Bayview Avenue, Southold
SCTM# 1000-75-4-22
Dear Mr. Bruer:
The following resolutions were duly adoptedby the Southold
Town Planning Board at a meeting held on December 23, 1991.
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board,
acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, start
the coordination process on this Type I action.
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant
sketch approval on the map dated September 20, 1991.
Sketch approval is conditional upon submission of final
maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an
extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by
the Planning Board.
Please note that five (5) paper prints of the final map,
containing a current stamp of Health Department approval, must
be submitted before a public hearing will be set.
Please note that the Planning Board has referred this
subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for their
review. You will be notified should any covenants and
restrictions be required.
Please contact this office if you have any questions
regarding the above.
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
cc: Matthew Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney
December 20, 1991
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
Southold Fire District, Bayview
Southold, New York
SCTM#1000-075.00-04.00-p/o 022.000
Dear Sirs:
In connection with the above matter and pursuant to your
request, enclosed herewith please find SEQR, Full
Environmental Assessment Form.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Enc.
AppendixA IIIlll ~E~20~ H~'
state Environmental Quality Revie~UUl ~ ~' u ~ i{_.~
desi ned to h I , . I. I%/t~llN~B0~J~l) ,
Purpose: The full EAF is g e p app icants ano agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent-
ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureab]e. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically e. xpert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The fuU EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3;
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-]arge, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 []Part 3
Upon review of the information ~'ecorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
[] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
[] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
[] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
* A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Title of Responsible Of[icer
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer)
Date
1
PART 1--PROJECT INFORMA~N
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTLC~,:" This. d~oc.u,,meq:.~ designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
on the enviror~ment. I~ease complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these quest OhS will be considered
as pa~t_of~th~a~pl~:a~:~p~roval and may be subject to further ver f cat on and public rev ew Provide any additional
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additiona~ work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
Southold Fire District, Bayview
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County)
Bayview Road and Baywater Avenue
NAME OF APPMCANTISPONSOR
Fre___d~ric__k Weber. Secretary for Southold Fire District
ADDRESS
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
(51.6 ) 765-3385
POBox 908. Main Road
CITY/PO
I STATE ZtP CODE
Southold NY 1 197 l
NAME OF OWNER (If different)
I BUSINESS TELEPHONE
George St epnoski ¢ )
ADDRESS
Main Bayview Road
CITY/PO
J STATE J ZiP CODE
Sout hold NY l 1971
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The purchase of four acres of vacant agriculture land for the eventual construction
of a firehouse auxiliary building. Also to setoff the 3.466 acffes from the 21.044.
Please Complele Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description .
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.*
1. Present land use: I-IUrban 1-11ndustrial
I~Forest (~Agriculture
2. Total acreage of project area: 21.044 acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural)
Forested
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.)
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL)
Water Surface Area
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill)
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces
Other (Indicate type)
I-ICommercial
[~Other
I-IResidential (suburban) E3Rural (non-farm)
PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
N/A acres N/A acres
N/A N/A
? 1. ~44 acres 3. 466 acres
N/A N/A
N/A acres N/A acres
N/A acres N/A acres
See survey acres See survey acres
N/A acres N/A acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Brown dirt
a. Soil drainage: []Well drained % of ~,ite ~Moderately well drained % of site
E]Poorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS
Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See I NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [~Yes K1No
a. What is depth .to bedrock? (in feet)
5. Approximate percentage of )roject site with slopes: I~0-1, % [2110-15% %
[~15% or greater %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? I~Yes /~]No
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? f-lYes ][]No
8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~lyes [~No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? I-lYes I~lNo
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
I-lYes ~No According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
[Z]Yes E~o Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
I~Yes ff'lNo If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? I-lYes ~No
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16.
,,,/-17'
18.
19.
20.
Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name b. Size (In acres)
Is the site served by~xisting Public utilities? E~Yes ~]No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~Yes I~No
b} If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? FqYes E~No
Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? ~]Yes [~o
Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [~fes F~No
Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~]Yes ~No
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scape of project (fiji in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor
b. Project acreage to be developed: 4 acres initially;
c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped Unknown acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate)
e. if the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %;
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A ; proposed . .
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour N/A (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family
Initially N/A
Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure Unknown height; width; length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 366 ft.
21. 044acres.
4
acres ultimately.
Condominium
3
2. How much natural material (i.e.'~, rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? r'lYes ~lNo rB]N/A
a. If yes, for what intend~C purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? EBYes I-INo
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [Yes C1No
N/A tons/cubic yards
year, (including demolition).
year.
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? N/A acres.
S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
I~Yes [3[No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction Unknow~ months, (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 2 month 92
c. Approximate completion date of final phase Unkno-~ month
d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? []Yes DONo
8. Will blasting occur during construction? i-lYes g:]No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction U/K ; after project is complete
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project None
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [~Yes ~]No If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? {l-lYes E1No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? []Yes []No Type Cesspool
14. VVill surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? [qYes
Explain N/A
ONo
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? OYes
16. Will the project generate solid waste? [~Yes ~]No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons
b. if yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [Yes {No
c. If yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfilli
e. If Yes, explain
[~Yes FBNo
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? OYes ][3No
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes ][:3No
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels?
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~lYes XE]No
If yes , indicate type(s)
J~No
E]Yes
[No
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity U/K gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [~Yes I-INo
If Yes, explain Local Fire District, Municipal Bonds
4
Approvals Required:
Submittal
Date
City, Town, Village Board E:]Yes ~]No
City, Town, Village Planning Board []Yes [:]No
City, Town Zoning Board [:]Yes [No
City, County Health Department I~Yes ~No
Other Local Agencies [3Yes ~]No
Other Regional Agencies [:]Yes ~]No
State Agencies DYes :,q'No
Federal Agencies []Yes ~]No
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ]~]Yes [No
. If Yes, indicate decision required:
r~zoning amendment F3zoning variance []special use permit E~ubdivision r~site plan
I-lnew/revision of master plan I~resource management plan Dother
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Agricultural/Residential
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
N/A
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Ag/R
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
Ten 2-acre residential lots
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? YC]Yes D-]No
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action?
Agricultural and one-family dwellings
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? ~Yes DNo
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? ?
a, What is the minimum lot size proposed? 3.466
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I~Yes ~]No
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? [Yes ~No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes DNo
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~lyes 171No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes []-]No
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that th~ informaton provided above s true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Spon/'o.r. dqam~ . F. red~J~k Weber Date 12/19/91
Signature (--"'~./Z..~(_/~//'~.~/.~//¢4_.~--~' Title Secretary
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
Part 2mP~OJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE :, ,,
~11 Responsibility of Lead Agency
General Information {Read Carefully)
· In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
reasonable~. The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
· Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant,
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an ira, pact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
· The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
· The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
· The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
· In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This
must be explained in Part 3.
IMPACT ON LAND
3 feet of existing ground surface.
I. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?
[~NO [~YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
· Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than
3 feet.
· Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles.
· Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within
6
I 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] []Yes L~No
[] [] I-lYes I-]No
[] [] I~Yes ~lNo
[] [] ~Yes E~]No
[] [] r~Yes I-~No
[] [] ~Yes I--I No
[] [] []Yes [~No
[] [] [=]Yes []No
[] [] I~Yes ~[No
[] [] I~Yes I~No
2. Will there be an effect t:. ~..~y unique or unusual land forms found on
the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)[~NO C1YES
· Specific land forms:
· Construction that will c~ntinue for more than I year or involve more
than one phase or stage.
· Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soill per year.
· Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill.
· Construction in a designated floodway.
· Other impacts
· Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
· Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns.
· Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? E]NO I-lYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given
hour.
· Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of
refuse per hour.
· Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed $ lbs. per hour or a
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed
to industrial use.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial
development within existing industrial areas.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? DNO E]YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site.
· Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat.
· Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other
than for agricultural purposes.
· Other impacts:
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? I-1NO [~]YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
· Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?
[~NO [~YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
8
~J~ 2 3
S I to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] J-lyes [-JNo
[] [] I-lYes [-]No
[] [] []Yes I--INo
[] [] ~ ~]Yes []No
[] [] I-lYes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes I--I No
[] [] []Yes I'-J No
[] [] []Yes J'-I No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] [-JYes J--JNo
[] [] F-lyes []No
[] [] []Yes i-INo
[] [] I-lYes ~-JNo
[] [] E]Yes E]No
[] [] J~Yes J-lNo
IMPACT ON WATER
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected?
(Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
E3NO FqYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Developable area of site contains a protected water body.
· Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a
protected stream.
· Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body.
· Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland.
· Other impacts:
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of water? I-INO I-1y E S
Examples that would apply to column 2
· A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
· Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
· Other impacts:
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? []NO I-lYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will_require a discharge permit.
· Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
· Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45
gallbns per minute pumping capacity.
· Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water
supply system.
· Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater.
· Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
· Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per
day.
· Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an
existing body of water to tr;e extent that there will be an obvious visual.
contrast to natural conditions.
· Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
· Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water
and/or sewer services.
· Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
· Other impacts:
6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface
water runoff? ~NO I~YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would change flood water flows.
7
~ I 2 3
Small to Potential i Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] [~Yes I'-lNo
[] [] I'-lYes I~No
[] [] I-lyes []No
[] [] f-lYes []No
[] [] []Yes I~No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] r-]Yes [-1No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes- ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~ ~ ~Yes ~No
December 16, 1991
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
Southold Fire District, Bayview
Southold, New York
SCTM#1000-075.00-04.00-p/o 022.000
Dear Sirs:
In connection with the above matter, please have the SEQA
process include not only the division of the property but the
purchase of the property by the Fire District from George
Stepnoski. This is in accordance with my discussion with
Matthew Kiernan and the members of the board.
Please also find a copy of the Fire District SEQA
determination which was executed on November 12, 1991.
Sincerely,
Enc.
::' P,~NN NG ,,
617.21
Appendix C
State Environmental Quality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor)
1. APPLICANT/~ON$OR 2. PROJECT NAME
Southold Fire District Bayview p~rchase
3. PROJECT LOCATION:
MuniciPality Southold Count~ Suffolk
SEQR
East by Main Bayview Road; South by Freeman's Lane a/k/a Baywater Avenue
SCTM# 1000~075.00-04.00- p/o 022.000
I$ PROPOSED ACTION;
'[~ Nov, ~--1 Expansion [] Mo(llflc~tlo~<erltton
B. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
The purchase of four acres of vacant agriculture land for the eventual construction
of firehouse auxiliary building.
?. AMOUNT OF LANO AFFECTS. , ,. / .~ ?.-/& ~
8. m~ ~[O A~ON ~M~Y ~ ~S~NO ZONIN0 OR OTHER ~ISTINO ~ND USE R~Tm~ONS?
~No ~f ~ ~ ~
[~Agrlculture
[] Pa~k/~o~e~l~, ~ [] Other
10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNOING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEOERAL.
STATE OR LOCALJ?
Southo!d To~..m Planning Board - Permission to divide property into two parcels,
consisting of~ ~i~cres and, 71.'~Ta~res
12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION?
[] Ye, [] No
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIPEO ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
ApmicznUs ...;;~:-- Southold ~re District
If the action Is In ~he ~astal Ares, and you Irt I stats a
Coastal As~samsnt Form before .prpc~cllng with this
OVER
0,,,: 11 //Z./91
PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency)
B. Wit. I. Ac'rtON RECEIVE COOROINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNUSTED ACTIONS IN $ NYCRR, PART 6r?.67 If NO. s negative C~eclarat~on
{~ Ye, D NO
C. COULD ACTION RESULT iN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATE0 WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be hanawntten, if Le~ore)
D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY.RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS?
PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE ~o De completeo Py Agency)
INSTRUC'tlONS: For each ac~'erse effect identified above, determine whether it is sut)stantial, large, important or otherwise signrficant.
Each affect should be eeeessect in connection with its (a) ~etting (i.e. url3afl or rural): (b) proOat)ility of occurring; (c) duration;
irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure treat
explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed.
[] Check this box if you have idenlified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY
occur. Then*proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration.
[-~ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting
documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result iR any significant adverse environmental impacts
AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons Supporting this determination:
Frederick R. Weber, Secretary
November 12,
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
SCOTY L. HARRIS
Supervisor
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
December 16, 1991
Rudolph H. Bruer
Edson and Bruer
Attorneys at Law
Main Road, P.O. Box 1466
Southold, NY 11971
RE: Minor Subdivision for
George Stepnoski
Main Bayview Road and
Baywater Avenue
Zoning District: Low
Density Residential (R-80)
SCTM# 1000-75-4-21 & 22
Dear Mr. Bruer:
The Planning Board has received your letter of December 13,
1991, regarding the above referenced subdivision.
A Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) will be
required, as the property is located within five hundred
feet of Goose Creak, a Critical Environmental Area (CEA).
(5OO)
In order to review drainage, particularly storm water runoff to
the residential area to the west, and to review traffic
considerations, the Board requires a more precise location of
the future building within the building envelope provided on
your map.
The Board will continue its review and start the State
Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) coordinated review,
when this data is received.
If you have any questions, or require additional
information, please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, Board of Trustees
December 13, 1991
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
$outhold, New York 11971
Re:
Southold Fire District, Bayview
Southold, New York
SCTM#1000-075.00-04.00-p/O022.000
Gentlemen:
In connection with the above application, enclosed herewith
please find the following:
Application
Questionnaire
One survey print with proposed building envelope.
Survey prints are being prepared and will be forwarded
to you upon receipt.
Form letter regarding draining, grading and
road construction
Part I of Short Environmental Assessment Form
Legal Description of Property (Schedule A)
Copy of tax map showing area
Please process the above application as soon as possible.
If you should have any questions or problems, please do not
hesitate to contact me at the above number.
Encs.
December 13, 1991
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
Southold Fire District
Bayview, Southold, New York
SCTM~1000-075.00-04.00-p/o022.000
Dear Sirs:
The following statements are offered for your consideration in
the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its
referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission:
1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a
firehouse auxiliary building is proposed.
2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in
the grades of the existing road.
3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing
structures are proposed.
sin.?z iy,
RHT~C am v
~)UTHOLD IOV~ ~
SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
SENDER:
SCTM#:
COMMENTS ·
C
.L
f~PROJEC. T LD. NUMBER
Appendix C .
State Environmental Quality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor)
1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME
Southold Fire District Bayview purchase
3. PROJECT LOCATION:
Municipality Southold County Suffolk
4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map)
East by Main Bayview Road; South by Freeman's Lane a/k/a Baywater Avenue
SCTM#1000-075.00-04.00-p/o 022.000
5. IS PROPOSED ACTION;
[~New [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration
6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
The purchase of four acres of vacant agriculture land for the eventual construction
of firehouse auxiliary building.
7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED:
Initially ~.~/, 0(~(// acres Ultimately 3. ,~/~.~'~' acres
8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS?
[] Yes [] No If No, describe briefly
9. WHAt iS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT?
[] Residential [] tndustria/ [] Commercial [] Agriculture
Describe:
10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL,
STATE OR LOCAL)?
[~Yes [] No If yes, list agency{s) and permit/approvals
Southold Town Planning Board - permission to divided property into two parcels,
consisting of/?.~acres and~,q$~ acres
11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [~No I! yeu, J/st agency name and permd/approval
12. AB A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMiT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MOD FICAT[ON? ~:No
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
Applican~ame: South~ld Fire District
If the act~n is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state
Coa,~tal Assessment Form before proceeding with this asse
OVER
1
SEQR
PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) ~
A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TY,:' :~ESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 If yes, cooJte the review process anU use the FULL E~AF.
[::]Yes [~Uo
B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 It No, a negative declaration
may be superseded by another involved agency.
[] Yes [] No
C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten. If legible)
C1. Existing air quality· surface or groundwater quality o¢ quantity, noise levels, existing tra/tic patterns, solid waste production or disposal
potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly:
C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly:
C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish shellfish or wild e species sign cant habitats or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly:
C4. A community's existing prans or goals as officia y adopted, or a change in use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain brlefl
C§. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly.
C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not idemdied in C1-C57 Explain briefly.
C?. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly.
O. IS THERE. OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS?
[] Yes [~ No If Yes, explain briefly
PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (TO be completed by Agency)
INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant.
Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d)
irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that
_ explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed.
[] Check this box if you have identified one or more Potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY
occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration.
[] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting
documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts
AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination:
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
PLANNING BOARD
16 DE(~ER 9, 1991
Mr. Edwards, Mr. McDonald.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
Mr. Orlowski: Oregon Road Recycling - SCTM %1000-83-3-4.5.
Done already.
Mr. Orlowski: At this time we have some people that have
scheduled appointments. Mr. Rudy Bruer is here to discuss the
parcel for the Southold Fire Distric't.
Mr. Rudy Bruer: The Fire District is purchasing some property
at Bayview for the purposes of a substation for emergency and
auxiliary equipment to service the Bayview and Peconic area.
They essentially feel that there is potential for loss of life,
particularly in the summer time for the inadequate response time
that traffic and whatever might take to get a emergency vehicle
for instance, from the fire house in town to out to the end of
Bayview. They think it is essential to have a substation
there. This property has become available and it is large
enough and suits all their needs. It has access on three
different roads. They specifically asked for, and received,
this fifty foot access off to South Harbor which has a
firewell midway on the Sepnoski farm not too far away, down
here, and access off.., and they can get to just about anywhere
down there and up to Peconic. We would like to do this by way
of a set-off. As a matter of fact tomorrow, if you read the
paper, there is a resolution for the funding of this, subject to
of course, the Board here approving it eventually. I will get
the application in at the meeting. Actually, I thought I had
submitted it.
Mr. Ward: What are they actually planning to build there, what
is going to be housed?
Mr. Bruer: Initially, it is going to be for a emergency
:vehicle and then there will be some fire equipment. That is all
at this point. It is solely because the population has grown so
much out there that they feel that particularly at this point
the emergency vehicles, somebody is going to die because of the
response time. Particularly in the summer time. This is ideal,
it is the main access to Bayview, you can shoot right down
there. You can get to Peconic, it is near water for its own
purposes and the property is large enough and they are fortunate
to have somebody who is willing to sell it to them. I agreed to
do it as a service, actually just to get it through because the
owner wasn't about to do it and we agreed we would take it upon
ourselves to do it as a condition of the sale. They are paying
a fair price for it.
PLANNING BOARD
17
DE~ER 9, 1991
Mr. Orlowski: Does anybody have any questions?
Mr. Ward: Do you plan to have access off all three roads?
Mr. Bruer: Well, the idea would be, I assumed because it was
very important to them to be able to say that they could get out
this way. I guess fence it off because they have got fifty feet
wide and they can get their trucks out. I would imagine it
would be on this street here. Bayview Avenue facing out and
they will get going on it as soon as they can. One of the
things we are going to have to do with respect to the purchases
is go through the SEQRA process because it is a fire district,
to coordinate the whole thing, here rather than having it
haphazard.
Mr. Orlowski: Do you want us to coordinate the whole thing?
Mr. Bruer: I would like to get together with it but I would
like to get it going sooner on that end of it otherwise I'm
going to have to do it myself and I wouldn't want to have to
have you redo it.
Mr. McDonald: Ail we would need would be some idea of a
building envelope and maybe the elevation of the building. I'm
not even sure we need drawing elevations but we do need height.
Mr. Scopaz: Well, you might be concerned about the setting of
the building because of the slope on this property.
Mr. McDonald: I'm not so concerned about that part of the
review because if they wanted to do this themselves they could.
But I want to make sure that if we are going to do the SEQRA
that we are not leaving them open for any kind of litigation on
that. If we do it without having any kind of building envelope
or some idea of what the building is, they are going to say it
wasn't a thorough investigation because clearly we didn't even
know where the building was going to be, so how did we do a
SEQRA on that part of it. That is the action you will be
taking, the construction of the building.
.Mr. Bruer: This is strictly for the cutting up of it. That
is what we are concerned about at this point.
Mr. McDonald: I understand but the fire department is no party
to the subdivision of the property.
Mr. Bruer: In one technical sense yes, in another sense no.
I mean we are for the contractual purpose of the property and we
do have a equitable interest in the property.
Mr. McDonald: But, by our code, you can't do that. I don't
think it really matters. If we do the whole thing we can lock
the whole thing all up rather quickly. Do they have any idea
where the building is going to be or anything at all?
DEC~ER 9, 1991
PLANNING BOARD
18
Mr. Bruer: I don't know if they have anything specific at
this moment as I said there is a meeting tomorrow, the election
for the commissioner is on for tomorrow.
Mr. McDonald: I would think that all we need is the envelope.
We don't need the building and we can wrap the whole thing down
in one move.
Mr. Ward: The more you can show the better.
Mr. Bruer: My only thing is, it is like any Board it is a
matter of getting everybody together. I will get this in as
soon as I can.
Mr. Orlowski: Just get the application in and if you get a
footprint on there we can do the whole thing.
Mr. Bruer: O.K., thank you very much.
Mr. Ward: A description of what they propose to do would be
helpful even if they don't have it drawn up.
Mr. McDonald: So we can put it into the record for the SEQRA
part of it.
Mr. Bruer: They did have a informal meeting early in the fall
or late summer in the paper and there was no opposition.
Mr. Orlowski: O.K., another thing here. A bond for the
Southold Villas.
Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, I would like to offer the following
resolution.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board adopt the
revised bond ESTIMATE for Phase 1 of Southold Villas dated
December 9, 1991, and to recommend same to the Town Board. The
revised bond estimate for Phase 1 is in the amount of
.$358,130.00 with an inspection fee of $21,488.00. The bond
estimate for Phase 2 is to remain as adopted June 24, 1991.
Mr. Latham: Second.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the
motion? All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards,
Mr. Orlowski, Mr. McDonald.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
SUBJECT: ~eo~%~ ~+¢ Fno~ ~,'
SCTM~:
CONMENTS: ~o¢ ~co~$~,~ ~3i
,/